This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्रीसं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007 /2003-05 .

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 41 ]

नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 4 अक्तूबर 10 , 2009 , शनिवार/आश्विन12-आश्विन 18 , 1931

No.41 ]

NEW DELHI, OCTOBER 4 OCTOBER 10 , 2009 , SATURDAY/ASVINA 12-ASVINA 18, 1931 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3 - उप-खण्ड ( ii) PART II Section 3-Sub -section ( ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

गृह मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

authorized occupants) Act, 1971 (40 of 1971 ) , the Central Government hereby appoint Shri Indashisha Nangrand , Deputy Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau , Shillong a Gazetted Officer of the Government of India to be the EstateOfficer w.e.f. 01-08-2009 for the purpose of the said Act and directs that the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties , imposed on the Estate Officer by or under the said Act in respect of all Govt. land and building under the control of Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Shillong.

[No.1 /C- 11/83 ( SIIG)-I/P.F. -11-1981 ] H. K. SUANTIIANG, Under Secy.

का. आ. 2729.-सार्वजनिक परिसर ( अनधिकृत अधिभोगी की बेदखली ) अधिनियम , 1971 ( 1971 का 40 ) की धारा 3 के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एत्तद्वारा सुश्री इदासिशा नागरेंड, उप निदेशक , सहायक आसूचना ब्यूरो , शिलांग , सरकार के राजपत्रित अधिकारी को उक्त नियम के उद्देश्य के लिए दिनांक 1-8-2009 से सम्पदा अधिकारी नियुक्त करता हूं और निर्देश देता हूँ कि उक्त अधिकारी प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करेंगे और उक्त अधिनियम के द्वारा अथवा उसके अन्तर्गत सहायक आसूचना ब्यूरो शिलांग के नियंत्रण में आने वाले समस्त सरकारी रिहायशों के संबंध में सम्पदा अधिकारी को अधिरोपित कर्तव्य का निर्वहन करेंगे ।

वित्त मंत्रालय (वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग ) नई दिल्ली , 30 सितम्बर , 2009

[सं. 1 /सी-11 /83( शिलांग ) -1/पीएफ - 11-1981 ] एच. के. सुआनथंग , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NewDelhi , the 29th September, 2009

का. आ. 2730, भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम श्रेणी 3 और श्रेणी 4 कर्मचारी ( सेवा के निबंधन और शतों का संशोधन ) नियमावली, 1985 के नियम 13 के उपनियम ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतत्द्वारा यह निर्धारित करती है कि श्रेणी III और श्रेणी IV के प्रत्येक कर्मचारी को 1 अप्रैल 2008 को आरंभ होने वाली और 31 मार्च , 2009 को समाप्त होने वाली अवधि के लिए S. O. 2729. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of un-

3540 G1/ 2009

(5991) 5992

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS बोनस के बदले में भुगतान , उक्त नियम में अन्य उपबंधों के अध्यधीन , उनके वेतन के 15 प्रतिशत की दर पर किया जाएगा ।

(C. P. V. Division)

New Delhi , the 25th September, 2009 [फा. सं. 2( 15 ) 96/बीमा- III ]

जे. एस. एस . शास्त्री, अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services) NewDelhi , the 30th September , 2009

S. O. 2732. In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section2 oftheDiplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees)Act, 1948 (41 of 1948) , the Central Government hereby authorise Shri P. Rajendran, Assistant in the Consulate General ofIndia, Houston to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officerwitheffect from 25th September, 2009.

[No.T-4330/01 /2006]

R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy.( Consular)

स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2009

S. O. 2730.-In exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub-rule (2) of rule 13 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Class III and Class IV Employees (Revision ofTerms and Conditions of Service) Rules , 1985 , the Central Government hereby determine that , subject to the other provisions of the said sub-rule, the payment in lieu ofbonus for the period commencing on 1st day of April , 2008 and endingwith 31st March, 2009 to every Class III and Class IV employee shall be at the rate of 15 per cent of his/her salary.

[F. No.2(15) 96/Ins . III ]

J. S. S. SASTRY, Under Secy.

का. आ. 2733.-केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के उपरांत उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

2. डा. एन. टी. आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा प्रदत्त डेंटल डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 50 के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तः स्थापित की जाएंगी:- "

का. आ. 2731. बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण अधिनियम , 1999 ( 1999 का 41 ) की धारा 4 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतत्द्वारा , सुश्री लोरेटा मैरी वास , अपर सचिव , आर्थिक कार्य विभाग , वित्त मंत्रालय को श्री राहुल खुल्लर , वाणिज्य सचिव के स्थान पर बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण ( आईआरडीए ) में तत्काल प्रभाव से तथा अगले आदेशों तक, अंशकालिक सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

V साइबर दंत विज्ञान संस्थान , गुंटूर दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

[फा.सं. 11 /6/2003- बीमा- III ]

सुकृति लिखी , निदेशक ( बीमा)

New Delhi , the 5th October, 2009

( i ) ओरल एवं मेक्सिलोफेशियल सर्जरी ( यदि यह 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस ( ओरल एवं मेक्सि लोफेशियल सर्जरी ) , डा. एन टीआर स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्व- विद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश

एमडीएस (प्रोस्थो. )

(ii) प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स (यदि यह 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

S. O. 2731. In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 4 of the Insurance regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), the Central Government herebyappoints Ms. Loretta Mary Vas , Additional Secretary, Department ofEconomic Affairs , Ministry of Finance as Part- time Member of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority ( IRDA) vice Shri Rahul Khullar , Commerce Secretary, with immedate effect and until further orders .

डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्व-विद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश एमडीएस ( आर्थो. )

(iii ) आर्थोडोंटिक्स

[F. No.11 /6/2003 - Ins . III ]

SUKRITI LIKHI , Director (Ins . )

विदेश मंत्रालय

(यदि यह 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

(सीपीवी प्रभाग)

( iv) कन्जरवेटिव डेंटिस्टरी

डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्व- विद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश एमडीएस ( कन्ज. डेंटि ) नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

(यदि यह 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

का. आ. 2732.-राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफिसर (शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में, केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री पी. राजेन्द्रन , सहायक को 25-9-2009 से भारत के कौंसलावास , हयूस्टन सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्त्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

(v) मुख आयुर्विज्ञान ( यदि यह 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्व-विद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश एमडीएस ( मुख आयुर्विज्ञान ) डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्व-विद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश" । [सं. टी-4330/1/2006 ]

आर. के. पेरिनडिया , अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर)

[सं. वी. 12017/17/2006 -डीई ] आर. शंकरन, अवर सचिव 5993 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE "VI जयपुर डेंटल कालेज, जयपुर ( i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

New Delhi, the 7th September, 2009

एमडीएस ( आर्थोडॉन्टिक्स ) राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

( i ) आर्थोडॉन्टिक्स (यदि 28-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

S. O. 2733. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) , the Central Government, after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part -I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

एमडीएस (पेरियो. ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

(ii ) पेरियोडॉन्टिक्स (यदि 28-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

एमडीएस ( ओरल मेडिसिन ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर 2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 50, in part- 1 ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh , the following entries shall be inserted there under :-

(iii ) ओरल मेडिसिन (यदि 31-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

"V Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences , Guntur (i) Master of Dental Surgery

एमडीएस(कम्युनिटी डेंटिस्ट्री) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

(iv) कम्युनिटी डेंटिस्ट्री (यदि 30-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

(i) Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (ifgranted on or after 21-4-2009 )

MDS (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery) , Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

एमडीएस ( प्रोस्थो. ) ,. राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

(v) प्रोस्थोडान्टिक्स ( यदि यह 29-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

(ii) Prosthodontics (ifgranted on orafter 21-4-2009 )

MDS (Prosthodontics) , Dr. NTR University ofHealth Sciences , Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

एमडीएस ( पेडोडॉन्टिक्स ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर

(vi ) पेडोडॉन्टिक्स (यदियह 31-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

(iii) Orthodontics (ifgranted on orafter 21-4-2009)

MDS (Orthodontics) , Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences ,Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

एमडीएस ( ओरल सर्जरी ) , राजस्थान स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर । " (iv) Conservative Denti- stry ( if granted on or after 21-4-2009)

(vii ) ओरल सर्जरी (यदि यह 3-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

MDS( Conservative Dentistry) Dr. NTR University ofHealth Sciences, Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

[सं. वी.- 12017/63/2005-डीई ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

NewDelhi , the 7th September , 2009 (v) Oral Medicine (ifgranted on or after 21-4-2009) or

MDS (Oral Medicine) , Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences ,Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh "

[No.V- 12017/ 17/2006-DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 7 सितम्बर , 2009.

S. O. 2734. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2 ) of section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of1948), the Central Government, after consultation with Dental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

का. आ. 2734.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 16) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: -

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 72, in Part- 1 ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948(16 of1948) pertaining to recognition ofdental degrees awarded by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences , Jaipur, the following entries shall be inserted there under: - "VI Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur

(i) Master of Dental Surgery

(i) Orthodontics (ifgranted on or after28-5-2009)

MDS (Orthodontics ) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur 2. दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , जयपुर द्वारा डेंटल डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में क्रम संख्या 72 के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके अंतर्गत रखी जाएंगी:-

(ii) Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 28-5-2009)

MDS ( Periodontics) Rajasthan University ofHealthSciences , Jaipur 5994

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

(iii) Oral Medicine (ifgranted onor after 31-5-2009)

MDS(Oral Medicine) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur (iv) Community Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 30-5-2009)

MDS ( Community Dentistry) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur (v) Prosthodontics (ifgranted on or after29-5-2009)

MDS (Prosthodontics) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur (vi) Pedodontics (ifgranted on or after31-5-2009)

MDS (Pedodontics) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur (vii)Oral Surgery (ifgranted on or after3-6-2009)

MDS(OralSurgery) Rajasthan University ofHealth Sciences , Jaipur

[No.V- 12017/63/2005-DE] R. SANKARAN, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2735. केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के उपरान्त उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

2. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलौर द्वारा प्रदत्त डेंटल डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधि नियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 49के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में येनेपोया डेंटल कालेज , मंगलौर के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तःस्थापित कीजाएंगी:-

"V येनेपोया डेंटल कालेज , मंगलौर ( i ) दंत शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

एमडीएस (सामुदायिक दंत चिकित्सा) , राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय बंगलौर"

(ix ) सामुदायिक दंत चिकित्सा (यदि यह 21-5-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

[सं. वी. - 12017/14/2006-डीई] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 7th September, 2009 S. O. 2735. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:-

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii)] Bangalore, the following entries in respect of Yenepoya Dental CollegeMangalore , shall be inserted there under:---

"V Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore,

(i) Master ofDental Surgery

(ix) Community Dentistry (if granted on or after21-5-2009)

MDS (Community Dentistry) Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences , Bangalore"

[No. V- 12017 / 14/2006-DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 7 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2736.- केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के उपरान्त उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

2. डा. एन.टी.आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश द्वारा डेंटल डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 53 के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

" III नारायण डेंटल कालेज एवं अस्पताल , नेल्लोर दंत शल्य चिकित्सा में निष्णात

(i ) पेरिओडॉटिक्स

(यदि 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस (पेरिओ. ) डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश ( ii ) ऑर्थोडोंटिक्स (यदि 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

एमडीएस ( आर्थो. ) डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश (iii ) प्रोस्थोडोंटिक्स

(यदि 21-4-2009 कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

एमडीएस (प्रोस्थो. ) डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश (iv ) ओरल पैथोलॉजी

(यदि 21-4-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान कीगई हो )

(v) ओरल मेडिसिन

एमडीएस ( ओरल पैथे. ) डा. एनटीआर स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश एमडीएस ( ओरल मेडिसिन) (यदि 21-4-2009 कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

डा. एनटीआरस्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय विजयवाड़ा, आंध्र प्रदेश

[सं. वी. - 12017/20/2006-डीई ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव 5995 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

NewDelhi, the 7th September, 2009

राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय बंगलुरू

(यदि 5-6-2009. कोअथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

S. O. 2736. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 (16 of 1948) , the Central Government, after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby , makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely:-

एमडीएस (कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री) राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलुरू

(ii ) कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री (यदि 5-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 50, in Part- 1 ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948(16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

एमडीएस ( ओरल एवं मैक्सिलोफेशियल सर्जरी ) , राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , बंगलुरू "III Narayana Dental College, & Hospital , Nellore

(iii ) ओरल एवं मैक्सिलो- फेशियल सर्जरी (यदि 5-6-2009 को अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

(1) Master of Dental Surgery

[सं. वी.- 12017/34/2004-डीई ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव (1) Periodontics (ifgranted onor after21-4-2009)

MDS (Periodontics ), Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

New Delhi , the 8th September, 2009 (ii) Orthodontics (ifgranted on or after21-4-2009)

MDS(Orthodontics ) , Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

(ii) Prosthodontics (ifgranted on or after21-4-2009)

MDS (Prosthodontics), Dr. NTR University Sciences of Health Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

S. O. 2737. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the Central Government , after consultation withDental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely:----

(iv) Oral Pathology (ifgranted on or after 21-4-2009)

MDS (Oral Pathology) , Dr. NTR University ofHealth Sciences Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh

(v) Oral Medicine (ifgranted on or after21-4-2009)

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 49, in Part- 1 of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences , (RGUHS), Bangalore , the following entries in respect of Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences , Bangalore , shall be inserted thereunder :-

MDS(OralMedicine), Dr. NTRUniversity ofHealth Sciences Vijaywada, Andhra Pradesh . "

"XXII Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences , Bangalore

[No. V-12017/20/2006-DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

Master of Dental Surgery

नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर, 2009

MDS (OralMedicine & Radiology),

(1) Oral Medicine & Radiology. (ifgranted on or after 5-6-2009)

Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences, Bangalore

का. आ. 2737.-केन्द्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतदद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्:-

(ii) Conservative Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 5-6-2009)

MDS (Conservative Dentistry), Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences , Bangalore

(iii) Oral and Maxillofacial MDS ( Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Surgery),

2. राजीव गांधी स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय (आरजीयूएचएस ) , बंगलुरू द्वारा प्रदत्त दंत चिकित्सा अर्हताओं को मान्यता देने के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16) की अनुसूची के भाग-1 में क्रम संख्या 49 के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में दयानंद सागर कालेज आफ डेंटल साइसेंज , बंगलुरू के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उनके अंतर्गत अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

(ifgranted on or after5-6-2009)

Rajiv Gandhi University ofHealth Sciences , Bangalore"

"XXII दयानंद सागर कालेज आफ डेंटल साइसेंज , बंगलुरू मास्टर आफ डेंटल सर्जरी

[No. V- 12017/34/2004-DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

( i) ओरल मेडिसिन एवं रेडियोलाजी

एमडीएस ( ओरल मेडिसिन एवं रेडियोलाजी) , 5996

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2738.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अंतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्तअधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एस्से टेरोका लि. , कायारलय-377/22 , छठा क्रास , विलसन गार्डन , बंगलोर-560064 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आईपीआर " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ईएसएसएई " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/309 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत मेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

IPR series

इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ टॉप में आउटर कवर और पिछली प्लेट काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं । स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के इन दोनों छेदों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकाला गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता ।

गयाहै । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 ×10 *, 5× 10 * ,*, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं । के

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 174 ) /2009 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 5997 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department ofConsumerAffairs)

NewDelhi , the 25th September, 2009

S.O. 2738. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with digital indication of " IPR " series ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) and with brand name "ESSAE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s. Essae Teraoka Limited , Office :-377/22, 6thcross, Wilson Garden, Bangalore -560064 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/309;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type) with amaximum capacity of 15 kg and minimum capacity of40 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal display (LCD ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternate current power supply . The model is PC based Point of Sale (POS) scanner cum weighing scale.

IPR series

Onthetop rear side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and rear plate, a leaded sealing wire, passing through two holes are passed for receiving the vertification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened withouttampering the seal .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration..

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg . to 50mg . and in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (174)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 5998

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2739, केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एस. ए. इंजीनियरिंग वे , ओल्ड नं. एलआईजी 99 , न्यूनं. 281 , पुलिस क्वार्टर , गणपथी , कोयम्बतूर -641006 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " एस ए-910 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए ए एस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/300 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्त्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के बायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर छेदों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर दो बोरेड स्क्रू से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 167 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 5999 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2739. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with digital indication of " SA- 910 " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name "AAS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M /s . S.A. Engineering Weigh, Old No. LIG 99, New No. 281, Police Quarters, Ganapathy, Coimbatore- 641006 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/09/300 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with amaximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode display (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instruments operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Onthe left side of the indicator two bored screws are fastened by the leaded sealing wire , passing under the outer cover and the bottom plate , for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 167)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI/ 2009-2 6000

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2740.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एस . ए. इंजीनियरिंग वे , ओल्ड नं. एलआईजी 99 , न्यू नं. 281 , पुलिस क्वार्टर , गणपथी , कोयम्बतूर-641006 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मितें उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एस ए-912 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए ए एस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/301 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 167 ) /2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6001 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2740 -Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said mode ) is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with digital indication of " SA- 912 " series ofhigh accuracy (Accuracy class - 11 ) and with brand name " AAS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . S.A. Engineering Weigh , Old No. LIG 99 , New No. 281 , Police quarters , Ganapathy, Coimbatore-641006, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 09/301;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of600 kg. and minimum capacity of 2.5 kg. The verification scale interval (e) 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

On the left side of the indicator two bored screws are fastened by the leaded sealing wire , passing under the outer cover and the bottom plate , for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 167)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6002

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2741.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एस. ए. इंजीनियरिंग वे , ओल्ड नं. एलआईजी 99 , न्यूनं. 281 , पुलिस क्वार्टर, गणपथी , कोयम्बतूर-641006 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस ए-913 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए ए एस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिहन आई एन डी/09/09/302 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेट फार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 4 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 200 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के बायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर छेदों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर दो बोरेड स्क्रू से कसा गया है । उपकरण की सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 167 ) /2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6003 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2741. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type) with digital indication of " SA- 913 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) and with brand name " AAS" (herein referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . S.A. Engineering Weigh , Old No. LIG 99, New No. 281 , Police Quarters, Ganapathy, Coimbatore -641006 , Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/ 302;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 4 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 200g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50- Hertz alternative current power supply.

Onthe left side of the indicator two bored screws are fastened by the leaded sealing wire , passing under the outer cover and the bottom plate , for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 167)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6004

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2742.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एस . ए. इंजीनियरिंग वे , ओल्ड नं. एलआईजी 99 , न्यू नं. 281 , पुलिस क्वार्टर , गणपथी , कोयम्बतूर -641006 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस ए-911 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ए ए एस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/303 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) के सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 167 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6005 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

NewDelhi , the25th September , 2009

S.O. 2742. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of "SA - 911 " series of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - 111 ) and with brand name "AAS" (herein referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/s . S.A. Engineering Weigh , Old No. LIG 99, New No. 281 , Police Quarters , Ganapathy, Coimbatore -641006, Tamil Nadu and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/303 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type ) with amaximum capacity of30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode display ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Schematic arrangement of sealing arrangement

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Governmenthereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 167)/ 2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 6006

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2743.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स इन्शा डिजीटल वेइंग सिस्टम, 28 , इंदिरा नगर , मट्टू थोट्टम , पोथन्नूर , कोयम्बतूर -641 023 , तमिलनाडु द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टीटी- इन्शा । " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इन्शा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 214 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 * ,के, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 100 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6007 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September, 2009

S.O. 2743. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " TT - INSHA I " and with brand name " INSHA" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Insha Digital Weighing System, 28, Indira Nagar; Mettu Thottam , Pothannur , Coimbatore- 641023 , (T.N. ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/214;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with amaximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply .

DIGITALSCALE

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-2 ] ( 100)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540G1/2009-3 6008

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II SEC.3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2744.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा (7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स एक्सपर्ट सेनसॉर्स एंड इंजीनियर्स इंक , 415 , गुमानपुरा , पॉल टावर के पीछे , कोटा -324 007 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यमं यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ईएक्सडब्ल्यूबी -30टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेबिज प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एक्सपर्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/38 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेबिज प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

उपकरण के इंडीकेटर में दोनों तरफ छेद बनाकर , इन छेदों में से सील वायर निकाल कर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों में से लीड और सील तार निकाल कर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । सील के साथ छेड़छाड़ किए बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 02 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6009 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2744. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "EXWB -30T" and with brand name " EXPERT" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Expert Sensors & Engineers Inc. , 415, Gumanpura, Behind Paul Tower, Kota- 324 007 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 38 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with amaximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result. Theinstrument operates on 230 Volts and 50-Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 3 Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing is done at both sides by making holes in the indicator of the instrument, then a seal wire is passed through these holes and a lead seal is applied. Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the bodyofthe instrument. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5tonne and up to 200tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, where kis apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (02)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] 6010

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2745.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंट एंड सिस्टम प्रा. लि. , ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , तारदेव , मुंबई-400 034 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जय पान " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 112 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( क्रेन टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

2ND

Cap.1000kg

HOLD

TARI

CRANESCALE

ZERO

ZERO 1.TARE

इंडीकेटर की बॉडी पर तार के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट लगाई गई है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है, स्केल की बॉडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 500 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 10,000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (48 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6011 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2745. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Cranet Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " CS " and with brand name " JAY- PAN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Jay Instruments & systems Pvt . Ltd. , E-16, Everest Building, Tardeo , Mumbai -4000 034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /09/ 112;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Crane Type ) with a maximum capacity of 3000 kg and minimum capacity of 20kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 1kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

2ND

Cap.3000kg

HOLD

TARE

HOLO

TARE

CRANESCALE

ZERO

STB

ON/OFF

Figure-2 Sealing arrangement

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagrame of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 500 kg and up to 10000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM -21 (48) /2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6012

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2746.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केंन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स आर. के. वेइंग कं. , 21 /ए , सुलतान नगर, गुर्जुर थाडी, जयपुर ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आरकेबी-6 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सम्राट " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 /211 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेबिज्र टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SMRAT

तार स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ इस तरफ निकाला गया है कि इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर दोनों तरफ तार द्वारा स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है , तोलन मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (92 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6013 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2746. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) ofseries "RKB -6 " and with brand name " SMRAT" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . R. K. Weighing Co. 21 /A , Sultan Nagar, Gurjur Thadi , Jaipur (Rajasthan ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/211 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbride Type ) with amaximum capacity of 60 tonne and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode display ( LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50-Hertz alternate current power supply .

Figure- 3 Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing point is afixed on the stamping plate is fixed on body of the indicator with the wire, in such a way that the wirepassing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulentpractice . A typical schematic diagrame of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Theinstrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 92)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6014

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2747.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स व्हेकेयर इंस्टूमेंट , सी-1 , शांतिनिकेतन कम्पलैक्स , 150 फीट रिंग रोड , धर्म नगर के पास , राजकोट ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डब्ल्यू आई डब्ल्यू बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " व्हेकेयर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 177 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

AN ISO 9001-2000 COMPANY

RHIGH CARK

888988

Weighcare instrument ( Rajkot)

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के किसी भी तरफ आऊटर और इनर कवर काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं । इन दोनों छेदों को लीड और वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 76 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6015 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2747. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity.with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - 111 ) of series "WIWB " and with brand name " WEIHGHCARE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Weighcare Instrument, C - 1 , Shantiniketan Complex , 150 Ft. Ring Road, Nr. Dharam Nagar, Rajkot ( Gujrat) andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09 / 177;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50- Hertz alternate current power supply.

AN ISO 9001-2000 COMPANY

888888

Weighcare instrument (Rajkot )

By the either side of the indicator, two holes are made by cutting the outer and inner cover and fastened by the lead wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 (76)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3540 GI/2009-4 6016

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2748.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स न्यू इन्डेल सकेल्स एंड सिस्टम , आरजैडए-152 , निहाल विहार , नांगलोई, नई दिल्ली -110041 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " आईएचटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " न्यूइन्डेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 239 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पऔर सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ आऊटर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दरों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर दो बोरेड स्क्रू से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए एडी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 ×10 *, 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 118 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6017 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2748. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures. (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop Type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " IHTT " andwith brand name "NEW INDEL" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . New Indel Scales and Systems , RZA- 152 , Nihal Vihar, Nangloi , New Dlhi - 110041 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/239 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop Type ) with a maximum capacity of30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

On the right side of the balance , two bored screws are fastened by a leaded sealing wire , passing under the outer cover and bottom plate , for receiving stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to50 mg . verification scale interval (n ) in the rage of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 118 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6018

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2749.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स न्यू इन्डेल सकेल्स एंड सिस्टम , आरजेडए-152 निहाल विहार, नांगलोई , नई दिल्ली-110041 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आईएलपीएफ " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " न्यू इन्डेल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 /240 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के दायीं तरफ लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5× 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 118 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6019

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2749. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Plateform Type ) with digital indícation of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- 111 ) of series " ILPF" and with brand name " NEW INDEL" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . New Indel Scales and Systems , RZA- 152, Nihal Vihar, Nangloi , New Dlhi - 110041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09 /240;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg . and minimum capacity of400g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 20 g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 2Sealing provision ofthe indicator of model

Lead seal is affixed on the right side of the stamping plate for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 118 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6020

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2750.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सिमन्धर टैकनोलाजी , 113 , प्रथम तल , मधुकांत-11 , बरदोलपुरा म्युनिसिपल स्कूल के सामने , ओल्ड मधुपुरा , अहमदाबाद -380004 ( गुजरात) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एसटीटी II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SHRI SAI " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 120 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 50 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Simandhar Technology Ahmedabad

Sharisal

Ahmedabad

20 Kg Ug

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों कोलीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबधं का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 60 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6021 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi, the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2750.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class- II ) of series " ST- T II " and with brand name " SHRI SAI " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Simandhar Technology, 113 , First Floor , Madhukant - II , Opp . Bardolpura Municipal School , Old Madhupura , Ahmedabad-380004 (Gujrat) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/ 120;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type)with a maximum capacity of 20 kg. and minimum capacity of50g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 1g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Ahmedabad

Sharisal

Sharisai

SimandharTechnology

SimandharTechnology Ahmedabad

MaxMini'eValueClass 20Kg.50g.

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Fromthe right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastenedby a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg. to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (60)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6022

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2751.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सिमन्धर टैकनोलाजी, 113 , प्रथम तल , मधुकांत- II , बरदोलपुरा म्युनिसिपल स्कूल के सामने , ओल्ड मधुपुरा , अहमदाबाद-380004 ( गुजरात) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसटीटी III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SHRI SAI " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09 / 121 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । की- बोर्ड प्रचालन सुविधा सहित बिलिंग मशीन है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदांय पर कार्य करता है ।

Sharisai

Ahmedabad

Sharisai

SimandharTechnology Ahmedabad

20Ky40g

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबधं का एक प्ररुपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 60) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6023 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2751. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " ST- T III" and with brand name " SHRI SAI " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Simandhar Technology, 113 , First Floor , Madhukant - II , Opp . Bardolpura Municipal School , Ahmedabad- 380004 ( Gujrat ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 09/ 121 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with a maximum capacity of20 kg . and minimum capacity of40g. The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has billing machine with key board operatin facility. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 -Hertz alternative current power supply.

Sharisai

Sharisai SimandharTechnology Ahmedabad

SimandharTechnology Ahmedabad

Max.Mini'eValueClas

20Kg40g.29 Figure -2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card /mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . to 2 g. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5 g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 60)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3540G1/2009-5 6024

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2752.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सिमन्धर टैकनोलाजी , 113 , प्रथम तल , मधुकांत- II , बरदोलपुरा म्युनिसिपल स्कूल के सामने , ओल्ड मधुपुरा , अहमदाबाद -380004 ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एसटीपी III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SHRI SAI " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 122 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Ter

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और साइड प्लेट काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दानों छेदों कोलीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारुपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलनं उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 किग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 60) /2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6025 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2752. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " ST - P III " andwith brand name " SHRI SAI " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/ s . Simandhar Technology, 113, First Floor, Madhukant- II , Opp . Bardolpura Municipal School , Old Mathupura, Ahmedabad- 380004 ( Gujrat) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/122;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg and minimum capacity of 2 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

SimaridharTechnology Ahmedabad

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

From the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and side plate and fastenedby a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and upto 5000kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (60)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6026

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINĄ 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

नईदिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 27. 3. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित भांडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थित्तियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स बी. टेक इलेक्ट्रोनिक , 36 , अंकुर इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट , आर.एस. नं. 275/1 और 276 , शापर -360030 , तालुका- कोटदा सांगनी , जिला- राजकोट द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " बीटीडब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जिनियस डीजी स्केल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/195 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Genius

888888

B_Tech Electronic Shapar ( Guj )

इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर किसी भी तरफ तार के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट लगाई गई है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है , स्केल की बाडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्रारूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 *, 2× 10 * , 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 85 ) /2006 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6027 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत. का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2753. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge ) with the digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "BTWB" and with brand name " Genius Digi Scale " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by. M/s. BTech Electonic, 36, Ankur Indl . Estate, R. S. No. 275/1 and 276 Shaper - 360030 , Taluka -Kotda Sangani, District-Rajkot andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/ 195 ;

The saidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, and 50- Hertz alternative current power supply.

Genius

888888

B_Tech Electronic Shapar (Guy )

Figure- 3 Sealing arrangement

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on either side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a waythat the wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall be done to prevant opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 100 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5 g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 ( 85)/ 2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6028

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( in) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2754.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स मेटलर - टोलेडो ए जी, इम लैंगचर , 8606 , ग्रीफेंसी , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एक्स पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर- टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/182 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विंडो टाइप टेकनोलोजी सहित मास कोम्पेरेटर पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5100 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) । मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण को सीधा जनता को बेचने के लिए अभिप्रेत नहीं है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 , 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 54) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6029 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2754. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustaineduse andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with the digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I) of series " XP " and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo AG, Im Langacher , 8606 Greifensee , Switzerland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar , Powai , Mumbai -400072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 09/182;

The said model is based mass comparator with window type technology non- automatic weighing instrument with amaximum capacity of 5100g . and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval (e) is Img . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 -Hertz alternative current power supply . The instrument is not intended to be used for direct sale to public.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1 mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and withthe same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (54 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6030

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2755.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मेटलर - टोलेडो ए जी, इम लैंगचर , 8606 , ग्रीफेंसी , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " एक्स पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर - टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 183 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विंडो टाइप टेकनोलोजी सहित मास कोम्पेरेटर पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 600 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 0.1 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण को सीधा जनता को बेचने के लिए अभिप्रेत नहीं है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 54 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6031 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2755. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of series "XP " and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Mettler Toledo AG , Im Langacher , 8606 Greifensee, Switzerland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/ s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar , Powai , Mumbai -400072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 183;

The said model is based mass comparator with window type technology non - automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 600kg. and minimum capacity of 10g . The verification scale interval (e) is 0. Ig. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply. The instrument is not intended to be used for direct sale to public.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg. to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 50,000 or above for ' e' value of Img, or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 ( 54 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI /2009-6 6032

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2756.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो ए जी , इम लैंगचर , 8606 , ग्रीफेंसी , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " एक्स जे " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर -टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मेटलर-टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/ 184 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल सहित मोनो ब्लाक टेकनोलोजी पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 3100 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.2 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 2 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण को सीधा जनता को बेचने के लिए अभिप्रेत नहीं है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विमिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 : मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मास के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मासतः 1 × 10 , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (54) /2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6033 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2756. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now,therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of special accuracy (Accuracy class - I ) of series " XJ " and with brand name "METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo AG, Im Langacher , 8606 Greifensee , Switzerland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approvalmark IND/09/09/ 184 ;

Thesaid Model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle with mono block technology based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 3100g and minimum capacity of 0.2g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 2mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply . The instrument is not intended to be used for direct salé to public .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and withthe same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (54)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 6034

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2757.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मेटलर- टोलेडो ए जी, इम लैंगचर , 8606 , ग्रीफेंसी , स्विटजरलैंड द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " डब्ल्यू एक्स " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर - टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) जिसे भारत में बिक्री से पहले या बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के मैसर्स मेटलर - टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स , साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन 'डी/09/09/ 185 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रोमैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसीपल सहित मोनो ब्लाक टेकनोलोजी पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.1 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 1.0 मि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । उपकरण को सीधा जनता को बेचने के लिए अभिप्रेत नहीं है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 54 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6035 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2757. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of special accuracy ( Accuracy class - 1 ) of series " WX " and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Mettler Toledo AG, Im Langacher, 8606 Greifensee , Switzerland and marketed in India without any alteration before or after sale by M / s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai - 400072 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 185 ;

The said Model is an electro magnetic force compensation principle with mono block technology based non- automatic weighing instrument with a maximum capacity of 220g and minimum capacity of 0.1g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 1.0mg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply . The instrument is not intended to be used for direct sale to public .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of50,000 or above for ' e ' value of 1mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (54)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6036

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 / ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2758.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स दीया इंजीनियर्स , गली परस राम सरोगी , घंटाघर चौक, सिरसा 122055 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " डी ई टी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डनहिल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /09/ 148 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

* उपकरण में कलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (70 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6037 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi, the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2758.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top Type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II) of series " DET " and with brand name "DUNHILL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufacturedby M/ s . Deeya Engineers , Gali Paras Ram Saraogi, Ghantaghar Chowk, Sirsa - 122055 (Haryana) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09 / 148 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 20 kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

0000

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (70 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6038

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2759.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स दीया इंजीनियर्स , गली परस राम सरोगी , घंटाघर चौक , सिरसा -122055 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डी टी ई " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डनहिल " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 149 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया हैं ।

उपकरण में कलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 मि.ग्रा. से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (70 ) /2009] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6039 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

NewDelhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2759. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " DTE " and with brand name "DUNHILL" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Deeya Engineers , Gali Paras Ram Saraogi, Ghantaghar Chowk, Sirsa- 122 055 (Haryana) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09 / 149 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V , 50Hz alternative current power supply .

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (70)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI/2009-7 6040

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2760. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स दीया इंजीनियर्स , गली परस राम सरोगी , घंटाघर चौक, सिरसा 122055 ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " डी पी एफ" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डनहिल " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09 / 150 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत. लनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट अ: 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्पऔर सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों कोलीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (70 )/2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6041 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2760. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of series " DPF " and with brand name " DUNHILL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Deeya Engineers , Gali Paras Ram Śaraogi , Ghantaghar Chowk , Sirsa- 122 055 (Haryana ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 09/ 150 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom piate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not beopenedwithout tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Theinstrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of sinilar makc , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 * or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (70)/2009 ]

R. MATHUR BOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6042

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2761. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स धारा डिजीटल , 8/ए, वर्धमान काम्पलेक्स, भदेवा नी शेरी , भावनगर, गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " डीजेड -105 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जेनिथ" है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /316 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

मापमान के इंडिकेटर में बेस प्लेट और ऊपरी कवर में से तार निकाल कर और दोनों तरफ छेद करके सीलिंग की जाएगी । सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना इंडिकेटर को नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 248 ) /2008]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6043 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2761. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " DZ- 105 " and with brand name "ZENITH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s. Dhara Digital , 8 /A, Vardhman Complex, Bhadeva Ni Sheri , Bhavnagar, Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 08/316;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

DHARA DIGITAL

124

MFG.BY ZENITH DHARA DIGITAL BHAVNAGAR

Figure- 2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Sealing is done at both sides by making holes and by passing wire in between base plate and top cover in the indicator of the scale . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 248 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6044

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2762.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स धारा डिजीटल , 8/ए , वर्धमान काम्पलेक्स , भदेवा नी शेरी , भावनगर , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डीजेड -103 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " जेनिथ " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08 /317 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

DHARA DIGITAL

BHAVNAGAR.

BRAND NAME- ZENITH

वेइंग स्केल के किसी भी तरफ से बाहर और अंदर के कवर को काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं और स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड और तारं से बांधा जाएगा । सील से छेड़‌छाड़ किए बिना इंडिकेटर को नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 248 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6045 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2762. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " DZ - 103 " and with brand name " ZENITH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Dhara Digital , 8 /A , Vardhman Complex,Bhadeva Ni -Sheri , Bhavnagar , Gujarat which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/317 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230Volts , 50Hertz altemative current power supply .

DHARA DIGITAL

BHAVNAGAR .

BRAND NAME- ZENITH

Figure-2 Schematic digram of sealing provision of the model

By the either side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer and inner cover and fastened by the lead and wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. Ne. WM-21 (248)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6046

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2763.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी इक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गोरस सिस्टम्स ए 1 / 837/ 5 , मकरपुरा , जी आई डी सी , बड़ौदा -390010 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जीपी -7 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गोरस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/612 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग पाइंट लगाया जाता है । पॉट इंडिकेटर की बाडी के अंदर है और पोस्ट के सामंजस्य के लिए बाडी पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । इन दोनों छेदों में से सील तार निकालकर सीलिंग की जाती है । इंडिकेटर को सील से छेड़छाड़ के बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 *, 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 245 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6047 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2763. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " GP- 7 " and with brand name " GORAS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Goras Systems A1 /837/5 , Makarpura, G.I.D.C. Baroda- 390010 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/612;

Thesaidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg and minimum capacity of2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate to avoid fraudulent use . The post is inside the body of the indicator and no hole is provided on the body for adjusting the post. A seal wire is passed through these holes and is sealed . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (245)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540G1/2009-8 6048

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) )

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2764.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स गोरस सिस्टम्स ए-1/837/5 , मकरपुरा , जी आई डी सी, बड़ौदा-390010 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जीटी-11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " गोरस " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/613 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है 1

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों को रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग पाइंट लगाया जाता है । पॉट इंडिकेटर की बाडी के अंदर है और पोस्ट के सामंजस्य के लिए बाडी पर कोई छेद नहीं दिया गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के" ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं. और "ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 245 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6049 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/ श्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2764. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " GT- 11 " and with brand name "GORAS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Goras Systems A1 /837/5 , Makarpura, G.I.D.C. Baroda-390010 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/613 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230V, 50Hz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate to avoid fraudulent use . The trim pot is inside the body and no hole is provided on the body for adjusting the post . A seal wire is passed through these holes and is sealed . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (245 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6050

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2765.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड , पोवई , मुंबई -400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " CUB " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप- डुअल रेंज) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर - टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/600 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार- डुअल रेंज ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 15 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 7.5 ग्रा. तक 0.2 ग्रा. और 7.5 कि.ग्रा. से 15 कि. ग्रा. तक 0.5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Cab

TOCO

सीलिंग वे पैन के नीचे की जाती है , जहां दो छेद किए गए स्क्रू हैं , इन दो छेदों को स्टाप्प और सील के सत्यापन करने के लिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 231 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6051

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi, the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2765. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type - dual range ) with digital indication of " CUB " series of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. , Amar Hills , Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai -400072, Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/600;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type -dual range) with a maximum capacity of 15kg and minimum capacity of 10g . The verification scale interval (e) is 0.2g up to 7.5kg and 0.5g above 7.5kg and up to 15kg. It has tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Welantg

Cub

MATTIER TOLEDO

Figure- 2 Sealing Diagram of the model

The sealing is done below the weigh pan , where there are two holes screws , through which is leaded wire is fastened for receiving the verification seal and stamp. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 231 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6052

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2766, केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा (8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स मैटलर टोलेडो इंडिया प्राइवेट लि. , अमर हिल्स, साकी विहार रोड, पोवई , मुंबई-400072 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " LA " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप हुअल रेंज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " मेटलर टोलेडो" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /601 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार हुअल रेंज ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 40 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 15 कि.ग्रा. तक 2 ग्रा. और 15 कि.ग्रा. से 30 कि.ग्रा. तक़ 5 ग्रा. है । उपकरण में कुछ अतिरिक्त कार्य हैं जैसे मैनुअल कंट्रोल फंक्सन , प्री- पैकिंग , इन्वेंटरी फंक्सन , बल्क सेल्ज , सेल्ज सर्विसिंग , सेल्ज रिसिप्ट , लेबल, सेल्फ लेबलिंग और प्रिंटिंग सुविधा आदि । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सीलिंग वे पैन के नीचे की जाती है , जहां दो छेद किए गए स्क्रू है , इन दो छेदों को स्टाम्प और सील के सत्यापन करने के लिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा.तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले और " ई" मान 1x10के , 2x10 के, 5x10के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 231 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6053 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2766.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weight and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type -dial range ) with digital indication of " LA" series ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) and with brand name " METTLER TOLEDO " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Mettler Toledo India Pvt . Ltd. Amar Hills, Saki Vihar Road, Powai , Mumbai , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 08/601;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top-type- dual range) with a maximum capacity of30kg and minimum capacity of40kg . The verfication scale interval (e) is 2 g . up to 15kg . and 5 g . above 15kg . and up to 30kg . The instrument has the following additional functions like manual control function, pre-packing, inverntory function , bulk sales , self- servicing, sales receipt , label , self- labeling and printing facility. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The liquid crystal diode (LCD) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

Figure-2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

The sealing is done below the weight pan, where there are two holed screws , through which a leaded wire is fastened for receiving the verfication seal and stamp . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

further, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighting instruments of similar make accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with veification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g , or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x 10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same meterials withwhich, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM -21 (231 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6054

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2767.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कृष्णा स्केल मार्केटिंग , 1 रामेश्वर एस्टेट नेशनल हाइवे 8 पर , होली चाइल्ड इंग्लिश स्कूल के पास , ठाक्करबापा नंगर , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी एल टी.11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्लासिक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /350 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है कि न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदेश तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्केल की निचली प्लेट और ऊपरी कवर में दिए गए छेदों के जरिए सीलिंग की जाती है और तब इन छेदों के माध्यम से सीलिंग तार निकाली जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट सील के साथ स्वेल की बॉडी से निकाली गई सीलिंग तार से जोड़ा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मानमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1x10 के, 2x10 के, 5x10 के , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा.सं. डब्ल्यू एम. - 21 ( 267 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6055 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 1st October , 2009

S.O. 2767.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type-) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class- 111) of series " CLT- 11 " and with brand name "CLASSIC" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Krishna Scale Marketing , 1 , Rameshwar Estate , On N.H.No. 8 Nr . Holy Child English School , Thakkarbapa Nagar , Ahemedabad which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/350 ;

Thesaidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Table top -type-) with amaximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verfication scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

CLASSIC

CLASSIC The sealing is done through the hole , made in the bottem plate and top cover of the scale , and then sealing wire is passed through theses two hole . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal, to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub-section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government berebydeclare that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighting instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with veification scale interval (n) in the range of100to10,000 for ' e ' value of100mg to 2g and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value ofSg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufacturedby the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same meterials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM-21 (267)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 3540 Gl/2009-9 6056

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर, 2009

का.आ. 2768.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स कृष्णा स्केल मार्केटिंग , 1 , रामेश्वर एस्टेट , नेशनल हाइवे 8 पर , होली चाइल्ड इंग्लिश स्कूल के पास , ठाक्करबापा नगर , अहमदाबाद द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " सी एल पी -6 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " क्लासिक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है.) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 / 351 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्केल की निचली प्लेट और ऊपरी कवर में दिए गए छेदों के जरिए सीलिंग की जाती है और तब इन छेदों के माध्यम से सीलिंग तार निकाली जाती है । स्टाम्पिंग के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट सील के साथ स्केल की बॉडी से निकाली गई सीलिंग तार से जोड़ा जाता है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2× 10 के , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (267) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6057 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 1st October, 2009

S.O. 2768. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Mode ! described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform Type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) ofseries " CLP-6 " and with brand name "CLASSIC" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s. Krishna Scale Marketing, 1 , Remeshwar Estate, On N.H. No. 8 Nr . Holy Child English School, Thakkarbapa Nagar, Ahmedabad and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/351 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting diode (LED) indicates the weighing results .The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

The sealing is done through the hole , made in the bottem plate and top cover of the scale , and then sealing wire ispassed through these two holes . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal , to get the stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg and upto 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (267)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 6058

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC: 3( ii)]

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2769.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स एकता वेइंग सिस्टम , ए-4 , आईएलए सोसायटी , जनपथ कम्पलैक्स के पास , ठाक्कर बापा नगर रोड, इंडिया कालोनी , अहमदाबाद -382350 (गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एकता " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एकता " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/204 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

AKATA

तार स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ इस तरफ निकाला गया है कि इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर दोनों तरफ तार द्वारा स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग प्वाईंट लगाया गया है । तोलन मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की गई है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1× 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 94 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6059 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 1st October , 2009

S.O. 2769.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weigh bridge Type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " AKATA " and with brand name " AKATA " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Akata Weighing Systams , A-4 ILA Society, Nr . Janpath Complex Thakkar Bapa Nagar Road, India Colony, Ahmedabad- 382350 (Gujarat) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/204;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) withamaximum capacity of30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5 kg . It has a tare devicewith a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Llight Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

AKATA

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on both side body of the indicator with the wire , in such away that the wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board todisable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10kor 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (94)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 6060

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

नई दिल्ली, 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ.2770.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, बिहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृत्ति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स साई हाई- टेक प्रोडक्ट , एस नं. 352 , मांजरी ( बीके) , पुणे-412307 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "डीईडब्ल्यूएस- एचडब्ल्यूबी ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्बचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिक्का प्रचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन-बी एम आई सुविधा सहित टिकट प्रिंटिंग या इसके बिना ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डाल्फिन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/321 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिक्का प्रचालित व्यक्ति तोलन मरीन-बी एम आई सुबिधा सहित टिकिट प्रिटिंग या इसके बिना ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापवान अंतराल ( ई) 100 ग्रां. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

उपकरण के इंडीकेटर के ऊपरी कवर के अंदर वेल्ड किए गए स्टडों में छेद करके सीलिंग की जा सकती है , तब इन स्टडों के माध्यम से एक सील तार ले जाया जाता है और एक लीड की सील लगाई जाती है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 कि.ग्रा. से 200 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 253 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6061 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 1st October , 2009

S.O. 2770. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Eletronic Coin operated Person Weighing Machine with or without ticket printing and " BMI " facility) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - 111 ) of series " DEWS - HWB " and with brand name " DOLPHIN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Sai Hi -Tech Product , S. No. 352 , Manjari (BK) , Pune-412307 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08/321 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Coin operated Person Weighing Machine with or without ticket printing and " BMI " facility) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retainedtare effect. Liquid Crystal Diode Display ( LCD) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230Volts and 50 -Hertz alternative current power supply.

Sealing can be done by making holes in the studs welded inside the top cover of the indicator of the instrument, then a seal wire is passed through these studs and a lead seal is applied. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise of the powersvers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100 kg to 200 kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10%, 2 × 10kor 5 ×10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (253 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6062

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 / ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART IISEC. 3( ii) )

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2771.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स रिजोल्ट व्हेमेशन प्रा.लि. , ए- 1-2 , बेसमेंट सुवर्धा फ्‌लेट को-ओप. हाउसिंग सोसायटी लि. , पोस्ट आफिस के पीछे, जैन डेरासर लेन के निकट, नवरंगपुरा , अहमदाबाद-380009 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आर टी एम-6" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " रिजोल्ट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /604 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

REZOLUT

WeighbridgeIndicator

Class111Max60tMin200kge.10kg

A5156

सीलिंग प्वाइंट स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लगाया गया है जो इंडिकेटर की बाडी के बाईं तरफ तार से इस तरह से लगाया गया है कि लीड सील के साथ स्केल की बाडी से तार निकाली जाए । मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों के लिए खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलबंद किया जाएगा । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 250 टन तक कीअधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के , 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 237 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माष विज्ञान 6063 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 16 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the Ist Ocotber , 2009

S.O. 2771. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " RTM -6" and withbrand name " REZOLUT " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Rezolut Weighmation Pvt . Ltd. , A- 1-2, Basement , Suvrdha Flats Co.Op . Housing Socity Ltd. , B/h Post Office , Nr. Jain Derasar Lane , Navrangpura Ahmedabad- 380009 , Gujarat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /06/604 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with a maximum capacity of 60 tonne and minimum capacity of 200kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Class III Max 60t Min 200kg e. 10kg

REZOLUT

"Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on left side body of the indicator with the wire, in such a way that the wire passesing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent parctice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 250 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10kor 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured. 2

[F. No. WM -21 (237)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI/2009-10 6064

[PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2772.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स राणा इलैक्ट्रोनिक सिस्टम , एम -67 , श्याम पार्क, नवादा उत्तम नगर , नई दिल्ली-110059 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " आर ई श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " राणा" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/08 / 590 समनुदेशित किया गया है ,. अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा . है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन भाषेमान अंतराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मके धारित आधेयतुलम प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा तथा उसे कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाढी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई" माम के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 230 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6065 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the Ist Ocotber , 2009

S.O. 2772. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report şubmitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series "RET " and with brand name " RANA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Rana Electronic System, M-67, Shyam Park, Nawada, Uttam Nagar , New Delhi - 110059 which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/08/ 590;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Tabletop Type) with amaximum capacity of 20Kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate for the security ofcircuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use. Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the hole provided on the body of the instrument. The instrument can not be opend without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 1 mg to 50 mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials withwhich, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (230)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology .6066

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर, 2009

का.आ. 2773.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त माडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स राणा इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिस्टम , एम -67 , श्याम पार्क नवादा उत्तम नगर , नई दिल्ली -110059 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आर एस टी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " राणा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त माडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/ 591 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त माडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के किसी भी तरफ आउटर और इनर कवर काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड और वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम-21 (230 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6067 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi, the 1st October, 2009

S.O. 2773. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " RST- " and with brand name " RANA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Rana Electronic System, M- 67 , Shyam Park,Nawada, Uttam Nagar , New Delhi - 110059 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/591 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop Type ) with amaximum capacity of 30Kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 - Hertz alternative current power supply.

By the either, side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer and inner cover and fastened by the lead and wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opend without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Govemment - herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for 'e ' value of 100 mg to 2g and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10%, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (230)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6068

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA' : OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2774.-केंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स राणा इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिस्टम, एम-67 , श्याम पार्क , नवादा , उत्तम नगर , नई दिल्ली -110059 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " आर ई पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " राणा " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 08 / 592 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम-21 ( 230 ) /2008 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6069 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 1st Ocotber , 2009

S.O. 2774. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said mode is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to fender accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "REP- " and with brand name "RANA" (hereinafter referred to as the said model) , manufactured by M/s . Rana Electronic System, M - 67 , Shyam Park; Nawadna, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi - 110059 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/592;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform Type ) with amaximum capacity of 300kg and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results .The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 -Hertz alternate current power supply.

From the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened the lead and wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of5g or more and with ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 230 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6070

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 1 अक्तूबर, 2009

का.आ. 2775.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स सेंट्रल वेइंग लि. , यूनिट 142 , हर्टलेबूरी ट्रेडिंग एस्टेट , किडरमिनस्टर , वर्केस्टरशायर , डीवाई 10 4जेबी , यूनाइटिड किंगडम द्वारा विनिर्मित ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " सुपावे 3000 और 4000 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण वेइंग रोड व्हीकल इन मोशन के मॉडल का , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे मैसर्स एसबी सिस्टम्स प्रा. लि. , सी-64 , ओखला इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया, फेज -1 , नई दिल्ली-110020 द्वारा भारत में बिक्री से पूर्व अथवा बाद में बिना किसी परिवर्तन के विपणीत किया गया है और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 08/398 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

SUPAWEIGH 4000

उपकरण की सीलिंग और इलैक्ट्रोनिक सर्किट की सुरक्षा के लिए बेइंग डिस्पले पर दो सील लगाई जाती हैं । मॉडल की सीलिंग के लिए एक योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक भार सेल आधारित वेइंग रोड व्हील इन मोशन के लिए अंकक सूचन सहित स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता ≤60,000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता ≤ 1500 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( डी ) ≥10 कि.ग्रा. है । मापमान अंतराल संख्या ≤3000 है और अधिकतम स्पीड ≤5 कि.मी./घंटा है । एक्सल की अधिकतम संख्या ≤6 है और धात्रा की दिशा सिंगल दिशा है परिचालन तापमान -10 ° सैं से + 40 ° सैं और विद्युत प्रदाय 220-240 वोल्ट एसी 50-60 हर्ट्ज बारंबारता का है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू. एम-21 ( 127 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

6071 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

NewDelhi , the 1st Ocotber,2009

S.O. 2775.-Whereas the Central Government, after consideringthe report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards ofWeights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 ofthe saidAct, the CentralGovernment hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval ofthe model of automaticweighing instrument for weighing road vehicles in motion with digital indication of(Accuracy class-1) of series "Supaweigh 3000 and4000" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s . Central Weighing Limited, Unit 142, Hartlebury Trading Estate, Kidderminster, Worcestershire , DY 104JB , United Kingdom and marketed in India without any alteration befoere or after sale by M/ s . Ashbee Systems Pvt . Ltd. , C-64 Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi- 110020 and whichis assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/398;

SUPAWEIGH4000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 890

QWERTYUIOP

ASDFGHJKL

ZXCVBNM -

For sealing the instrument two seals are applied at the display of the weighing instrument for safety ofelectronic circuit. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The said model is a load cell based automatic weighing instrument forweighing road vehicles in motion with digital indication with a maximum capacity ≤60,000kg and minimum capacity of ≥ 1500kg. The scale interval (d) is ≥ 10 kg. The number of scale intervals is ≤ 3000 and maximum speed ≤ 5km/hr. The maximum numbers ofaxles are ≤ 6 and direction of travel is single direction . The operating temperature is -10 °C to +40 °C and power supply is 220-240 V AC having 50/60Hz frequency.

[F. No. WM-21 (127)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 6072

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर, 2009

का.आ. 2776.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अपलैब लिमिटिड , यूनिट III , प्लाट नं. 12 , डिषा विलेज , टीटीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , थाने , बेलापुर रोड़, नवी मुंबई-400708 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित "स्वदेस - 1-21221-7" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , इलैक्टोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प ( स्टेंडर्ड ड्यूटी पम्प ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्वदेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/301 समनुदेशित किया गयाहै,

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO.- SWADESI - 21221-7

थ्रेडिड वायर और सील से सीलिंग की जाती है । मीटरिंग यूनिट के स्क्रू छेद में से वायर निकाल कर और वायर के अंतिम में मीटर को सील और स्टम्प किया जाता है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल की सीलिंग व्यवस्था का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रानिक डिस्पैसिंग पम्प है जिसमें सिंगल नोजल के साथ पाजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर और नॉन रिवरसिबल इलैक्ट्रोनिक टोटलाइजर है । इसकी क्षमता के लिए अधिकतम प्रदर्श 7 अंकों तक है, रुपए में विक्रय दर के लिए प्रदर्श 7 अंकों में है और दर प्रति लिटर 5 अंकों में है । न्यूनतम प्रभाग 10 मि. लि. है । इसके अतिरिक्त मॉडल में डेंसिटी प्रदर्श ( स्टेटिक ) 4 अंकों में और संचार आदि के लिए संचार पोर्ट के साथ बाहरी उपाय और हार्डवेयर के लिए आटोमेशन सुविधा है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 40 लिटर प्रति मिनट है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण इलेक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशन सुविधा सहित या मेकेनीकल कलिब्रेशन सुविधा रहित है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 99 ) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6073 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October, 2009

S.O. 2776. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model ofelectronic Dispensing pump (Standard duty pump ) with digital indication with ' SWADES- 1-21221-7 ' series and brand name " SWADES" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured byM/s. Aplab Limited , Unit III , Plot No. 12, Digha Village, TTC Industrial Area, Thane, Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai -400708 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 09/301 ;

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO. - SWADES1-21221-7

The seal is done by threaded wire and seal. The wire is passed through the screw holds in the metering unit and at the end of the wire , meter is sealed and stamped. The instrument cannot be opened without breaking the seal. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The said model is an electromic dispensing pump and consists of positive displacement meter with single nozzle and non -reversible electronic totalizer. Its maximum display for volume upto 7 digits , display for sale value in rupees is of 7digits and rate per litre is of 5 digits . The smallest division is 10ml . Further the model is having facility for the denisity display (static) in 4 digits and with communication port for communicating to the external devices and hardware for automation etc. It operates on 220V, 50Hertz alternate current power supply . The maximum flow rate is 40 litre per minute. The results are indicated by the Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display. The instrument also has the facility of electronic calibration with or without mechanical calibration .

[F. No. WM-21 (99)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 6074

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2777. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) निबम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अपलैब लिमिटिड , यूनिट III , प्लाट नं. 12 , डिभा विलेज , टीटीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , थाने , बेलापुर रोड़ , नवी मुंबई -400708 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " स्वरेस- 1-21222-7 वाला के अंकक सूचन सहित इलैक्टोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प ( हैवी ड्यूटी पम्प ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का गाम "स्वदेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /302 समनुदेशित किया गया

MAKE -APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO. - SWADESI - 21222-7

ब्रेडिड वायर और सील से सीलिंग की जाती है । मीटरिंग यूनिट के स्क्रूछेद में से वायर निकाल कर और वायर के अंतिम में मीटर को सील और स्टम्प किया जाता है । सील को तोड़े बिना उपकरण को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल की सीलिंग व्यवस्था का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उक्त माडल एक इलैक्ट्रानिक डिस्पैसिंग पम्प है जिसमें सिंगल नोजल के साथ पाजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर और नॉन रिवरसिबल इलैक्ट्रोनिक टोटलाइजर है । इसकी क्षमता के लिए अधिकत्तम प्रदर्श 7 अंकों तक है , रुपए में विक्रय दर के लिए प्रदर्श 7 अंकों में है और दर प्रति लिटर 5 अंको में है । न्यूनतम प्रभाग 10 मि. लि. है । इसके अतिरिक्त मॉडल में डेंसिटी प्रदर्श ( स्टेटिक ) 4 अंकों में और संचार आदि के लिए संचार पोर्ट के साथ बाहरी उपाय और हार्डवेयर के लिए आटोमेशन सुविधा है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 70 लिटर प्रति मिनट है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण इलैक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशण सुविधा सहित या मेकनीकल केलिब्रेशन सुविधा रहित है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (99)/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6075 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2777.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of elecrtronic Dispensing pump (Heavy duty pump) with digital indication with ' SWADES- 1-21222-7 ' series and brand name "SWADES" (herein referred to as the said Model), manufactured by M/s. Aplab Limited, Unit III, Plot No. 12, Digha Village , TTC Industrial Area, Thane , Belapur Road,Navi Mumbai -400708 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /08 /302 ;

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO. - SWADES I - 21222-7

The seal is done by threaded wire and seal . The wire is passed through the screw holes in the metering unit and at the end ofthewire , meter is sealed and stamped. The instrument cannot be opened without breaking the seal . A typical schematic diagram ofsealing provision of the model is given above .

The said model is an electronic dispensing pump and consists of positve displacement meter with single nozzle and non reversible electronic totalizer. Its maximum display for volume upto 7 digits , display for sale value in rupees is of7 digitsand rate per litre is of 5 digits . The smallest division is 10ml . Further the model is having facility for the density display (static) in4digits and with communication port for communicating to the external devices and hardware for automatic etc. It operates on 220V , 50Hertz alternate current power supply. The maximum flow rate is 70 liter per minute . The results are indicatedby the Liquid Crystal Diode (LCD) display. The instrument also has the facility of electronic calibration with or without mechanical calibration .

[F. No. WM-21 (99)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6076

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2778.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्तं मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अपलैब लिमिटिड , यूनिट 111 , प्लाट नं. 12 , डिघा विलेज , टीटीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , थाने , बेलापुर रोड़ , नवी मुंबई -400708 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " स्वदेस- 11-22423-7" श्रृंखला के अंककं सूचन सहित इलैक्टोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प ( स्टेंडर्ड ड्यूटी डुअल पम्प ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्वदेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/303 समनुदेशित किया गया है ,

Swades

उक्त माडल एक इलैक्ट्रानिक डिस्पैंसिंग पम्प है जिसमें डुअल नोजल के साथ पाजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर और नॉन रिवरसिबल इलैक्ट्रोनिक टोटलाइजर है । इसकी क्षमता के लिए अधिकतम प्रदर्श 7 अंकों तक है , रुपए में विक्रय दर के लिए प्रदर्श 7 अंकों में है और दर प्रति लीटर 5 अंकों में है । न्यूनतम प्रभाग 10 मि. लि. है । इसके अतिरिक्त माडल में डेंसिटी प्रदर्श ( स्टेटिक ) 4 अंकों में और संचार आदि के लिए संचार पोर्ट के साथ बाहरी उपाय और हार्डवेयर के लिए आटोमेशन सुविधा है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 40 लीटर प्रति मिनट है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण इलैक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशन सुविधा सहित या मेकेनीकल केलिब्रेशन सुविधा रहित है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 99) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6077 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October, 2009

S.O. 2778. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of electronic Dispensing pump (Standard duty dual pump ) with digital indication with ' SWADES- II - 22423-7 ' series and brand name "SWADES" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Aplab Limited, Unit III , Plot No. 12, Digha Village, TTC Industrial Area , Thane , Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai -400708 , Maharashtra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/303;

Swades

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO. - SWADES II - 22423-7

The seal is done by threaded wire and seal. The wire is passed through the screw holds in the metering unit and at the end of the wire , meter is sealed and stamped . The instrument cannot be opened without breaking the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given abovė .

The said model is an electronic dispensing pump and consists of positve displacement meter with dual nozzle and non reversible electronic totalizer . Its maximum display for volume is upto 7 digits , display for sale value in rupees is of 7digits and rate per litre is of 5 digits . The smallest division is 10ml . Further the model is having facility for the density display (static ) in 4 digits and with communication port for communicating to the external devices and hardware for automation etc. It operates on 220V , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. The maximum flow rate is 40 liter per minute . The results are indicated by the Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display . The instrument also has the facility of electronic calibration with or without mechanical calibration .

[F. No. WM -21 (99 )/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6078

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2779.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अपलैब लिमिटिड , यूनिट III , प्लाट नं. 12 , डिघा विलेज , टीटीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , थाने , बेलापुर रोड़ , नवी मुंबई -400708 महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " स्वदेस - 11-22424-7" शृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित इलैक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प ( हैवी ड्यूटी डुअल पम्प ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्वदेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08 /304 समनुदेशित किया गया है,

Swader

उक्तमॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पैंसिंग पम्प है जिसमें डुयल नोजल के साथ पाजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर और नॉन रिवरसिबल इलैक्ट्रोनिक टोटलाइजर है । इसकी क्षमता के लिए अधिकतम प्रदर्श 7 अंकों तक है, रुपए में विक्रय दर के लिए प्रदर्श 7 अंकों में है और दर प्रति लिटर 5 अंको में है । न्यूनतम प्रभाग 10 मि. लि. है । इसके अतिरिक्त मॉडल में डेंसिटी प्रदर्श ( स्टेटिक ) 4 अंकों में और संचार आदि के लिए संचार पोर्ट के साथ बाहरी उपाय और हार्डवेयर के लिए आटोमेशन सुविधा है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 70 लिटर प्रति मिनट है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरणं इलेक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशन सुविधा सहित या मेकेनीकल केलिब्रेशन सुविधा रहित है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (99) /2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6079 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi, the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2779.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model ofelectronic Dispensing pump (Heavy duty dual pump ) with digital indication with ' SWADES - II - 22424-7 ' series and brand name " SWADES" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s .Aplab Limited , Unit III , Plot No. 12, Digha Village , TTC IndustrialArea, Thane, Belapur Road, Navi Mumbai -400708, Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 08/304;

MAKE- APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO . - SWADES II - 22424-7

The seal is done by threaded wire and seal . The wire is passed through the screw holes in the metering unit and at the end of the wire , meter is sealed and stamped. The instrument can not be opened without breaking the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

The saidModel is an electronic dispensing pump and consists of positive displacement meter with dualnozzle and non reversible electronic totalizer . Its maximum display for volume upto 7 digits , display for sale value in rupees is of 7digits and rate per litre is of 5 digits . The smallest division is 10ml . Further the Model is having facility for thedensity display (static ) in 4 digits and with communication port for communicating to the external devices and hardware for automaticetc. Itoperates on 220V , 50 Hertz alternate current power supply . The maximum flow rate is 70 liter per minute.The results are indicated by the Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD ) display. The instrument also has the facility of electronic calibration with or without mechanical calibration .

[F. No. WM-21 (99)/2008)

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI /2009-12 6080

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2780.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अपलैब लिमिटिड , यूनिट III , प्लाट नं. 12 , डिघा विलेज , टीटीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया , थाने , बेलापुर रोड , नवी मुंबई -400 708 , महाराष्ट्र द्वारा विनिर्मित " स्वदेस- II - 22425-7 "श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , इलैक्ट्रोनिक डिस्पेंसिंग पम्प ( स्टेंडर्ड एंड हैवी ड्यूटी डुअल पम्प ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " स्वदेस " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/305 समनुदेशित किया गया है,

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED MODEL NO. - SWADES II - 22425-7

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रानिक डिस्पैंसिंग पम्प है जिसमें डुयल नोजल के साथ पाजिटिव डिस्पलेसमेंट मीटर और नॉन रिवरसिबल इलैक्ट्रोनिक टोटलाइजर है । इसकी क्षमता के लिए अधिकतम प्रदर्श 7 अंकों तक है , रुपए में विक्रय दर के लिए प्रदर्श 7 अंकों में है और दर प्रति लिटर 5 अंको में है । न्यूनतम प्रभाग 10 मि. लि. है । इसके अतिरिक्त मॉडल में डेंसिटी प्रदर्श ( स्टेटिक ) 4 अंकों में और संचार आदि के लिए संचार पोर्ट के साथ बाहरी उपाय और हार्डवेयर के लिए आटोमेशन सुविधा है । उपकरण 220 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है । अधिकतम प्रवाह दर 40/70 लिटर प्रति मिनट है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण इलैक्ट्रोनिक केलिब्रेशन सुविधा सहित या मेकेनीकल केलिब्रेशन सुविधा रहित है ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 99 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6081 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत काराजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2780.-Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights andMeasures (Approval ofModels ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Aet, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of elecrtronic Dispensing Pump (Standard & Heavy duty dual pump) with digital indication with ' SWADES - 11-22425-7 ' series and brand name " SWADES" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/ s . Aplab Limited , Unit III , Plot No. 12, Digha Village , TTC Industrial Area , Thane , Belapur Road , Navi Mumbai -400 708 , Maharastra and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 08/305;

MAKE - APLAB LIMITED

MODEL NO . - SWADES II - 22425-7

The seal is done by threaded wire and seal . The wire is passed through the screw holes in the metering unit and at the end of the wire , meter is sealed and stamped. The instrument can not opened without breaking the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The said model is an electronic dispensing pump and consists of positve displacement meter with dual nozzle and non reversible electronic totalizer . Its maximum display for volume upto 7 digits, display for sale value in rupees is of7digits and rate per litre is of 5 digits . The smallest division is 10ml . Further the model is having facility for the density display (static) in 4 digits and with communication port for communicating to the external devices and hardware for automation etc. It operates on 220V, 50 Hertz alternate current power supply. The maximum flow rate is 40/70 liter per minute. The results are indicated by the Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) display . The instrument also has the facility of electronic calibration with or without mechanical calibration .

[F. No. WM-21 (99)/2008 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6082

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2781. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स इंटरनेशनल रोड डायनमिक्स साउथ एशिया प्रा. लि. , विला. , ग्राउंड फ्लोर , ब्लाक- V चार्मवुड विलेज , सूरजकुंड रोड, फरीदाबाद-121009, हरियाणा द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग -0.5 वाले " SSWIM 4020 " शृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टोटल व्हीकल वेइंग ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ird " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/08/374 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित स्वचालित तोलत उपकरण ( टोटल व्हीकल वेट ) है जिसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । वेब्रिज के स्टील प्लेटफार्म को गढ़े के ऊपर खड़ा किया गया है जिसे दो लोड सैल में सस्पेंड किया गया है । एक्सल का वज़न सारे लोड सैल को सेंस भी करता है , एड भी करता है और रोड के एक साइड में फिट किए गए जंकसन बाक्स/कंट्रोलर के डिजीटल व्हे इंडीकेटर में फीड कर देता है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

उपकरण को सील करने के लिए दो सील लगाई जाती है, एक सील इलैक्ट्रानिक सर्किट की सुरक्षा हेतु तुलन उपस्कर के डिस्प्ले के बायीं तरफ और दूसरी सील मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा हेतु डिस्प्ले यूनिट के दायीं तरफ नीचे लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त 'अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो ऽग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 के , 2x10 के , 5x10 के के है, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यं के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 249 )/2008 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6083 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

NewDelhi, the 5th October, 2009

S.O. 2781. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (ApprovalofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of automatic weighing instrument (Total vehicle weighing) with digital indication of accuracy class -0.5 of series " SSWIM 4020 " and with brand name " ird " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . International Road Dynamics South Asia Pvt . Ltd. , Villa 13, Ground Floor , Block- V, Charmwood Village , Surajkund Road, Faridabad - 121 009, Haryana and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/08/374.

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic weighing instrument ( Total vehicle weighing) with a maximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 500 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10kg . There is a pit mounted steel platform of weighbridge suspended on the two load cells . The weight of the axle is sensed by all the load cells is summed up and fed to digital weight indicator through the junction box/controlloer fillted one side ofthe road. The lightemitting diode (LED) indicaters the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Fig3 Sealing Arrangement

For sealing the instrument two seals are applied , one is at the left side of the display of the weighing instrument for safety of electronic circuit and the other seal is at the right side below of the display unit for safety of mechanical assembly. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - section( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 1000 for e' value of5g.ormone and with e' value of 1x10 , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (249)/2008]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 6084

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली , 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2782.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स लीटैक वेइंग सिस्टम्स , 342 , फोकल पवाइंट अमृतसर द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " ईसीएस . - 200 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लीटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 09 / 206 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलत उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रर्दश तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्माता उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10के , 2x10के , 5x10के , के है , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (90 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6085 [ भाग II- खंण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2782.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Governrnent hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series "ECS- 200 " and with brand name " LEETECH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Leetech Weighing Systems , 342, Focal Point Amritsar which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/206 .

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Total top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighng result . The instrument operates of 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external contral to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg. to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x 10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured:

[F. No. WM -21 (90)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6086

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2783.-केन्द्रीय सरंकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स लीटैक वेइंग सिस्टमज , 342 , फोकल प्वाइंट अमृतसर द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ईपीएस -101 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लीटैक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/207 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सैल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलत उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रर्दश तोलम परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

LEETECH

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विर्नित द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और ई " मान 1x10 के , 2x10के, 5x10के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 90 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6087 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

New Delhi , the 5th October, 2009

S.O. 2783.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods ofsustained use andto render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication ofmedium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) ofseries " EPS - 101 " and with brand name " LEETECH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufactured by M/s . Leetech Weighing Systems, 342, Focal Point, Amritsar which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/207.

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg and minimum capacity of400 g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) indicates the weighng results . The instrument operates of 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate for the security of cricuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use. Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section( 12) ofsection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg upto 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of lx 10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or nagative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM-21 (90)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3540GI/2009-13 6088

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii )]

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2784.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम, 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए मानक ( कों ) में 'संशोधन किया गया/किए गए हैं ।

अनुसूची

क्रम संख्या

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि संशोधित भारतीय मानक की संख्या और वर्ष

संशोधन संख्या ।

31अगस्त, 2009

अगस्त, 2009

आई एस 14278 : 1995 कंक्रीट और चिनाई बांधों में प्रतिवत्न मापन युक्तियां , संस्थापन , चालू करना तथा प्रेक्षण- रीति संहिता

इस संशोधन की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो मानक भवन 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों नईदिल्ली , कोलकाता, चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों अहमदाबाद , बंगलोर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर, गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , पटना , पुणे तथा तिरुवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध है ।

[संदर्भः डब्ल्यूआर डी 16/टी -18 ]

जे. सी. अरोड़ा, वैज्ञा. ई. एवं प्रमुख जल संसाधन विभाग )

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

New Delhi , the 25th September, 2009

S.O. 2784. In pursuance of clause (b) ofsub -rule 1 of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Buerau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued :

SCHEDULE

S. No.

No. and Year of the amendment

No. Title and Year of the Indian Standards

Date from which the amendment shall have effect

31-8-2009

Amendment No. 1

IS 14278 : 1995 StressMeasuring

August, 2009

Devices in Concrete and Masonry Dams-Installation, Commission-

ing and Observations Code of

Practice

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah , Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices: Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore, Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna, Pune , Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref. WRD 16/T- 18]

J. C. ARORA , Sc.- E & Head ( Water Resources Deptt. )

परमाणु ऊर्जा विभाग

आदेश

मुंबई , 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2785.-परमाणु ऊर्जा अधिनियम, 1962 ( 1962 का 33 ) की धारा 27 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा यह निदेश देती है कि इस आदेश के साथ संलग्न अनुसूची के कॉलम ( 2 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्रों, जो कि निषिद्ध क्षेत्र हैं , के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 के द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियाँ उक्त अनुसूची के कॉलम (3 ) में संगत प्रविष्टियों में उल्लिखित सभी अथवा उनमें से किसी भी अधिकारी अथवा प्राधिकारी द्वारा भी प्रयोग की जा सकेंगी ।

अनुसूची

अधिकारी अथवा प्राधिकारी का पदनाम

क्र. सं. निषिद्ध क्षेत्र का नाम

(1 )

(2)

(3)

1. अध्यक्ष एवं प्रबंध निदेशक , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड़

बागजाता यूरेनियम खान यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड 6089 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

2. निदेशक ( तकनीकी ) , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड

जिला पूर्वी सिंहभूम , झारखंड निम्नलिखित प्लाट सं. द्वारा कवर

3. महाप्रबंधक ( कार्मिक ) , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड

बागजाता खान के प्लाट नंबर (फुलझरी , मौजा) :

4. महाप्रबंधक ( खान ) , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड

484,485, 486, 489, 488 , 458 , 490, 492, 501 , 500,499,498 , 497,496, 512, 51 1,513 , 514 , 515 , 516, 517,691 , 42, 28, 30,33, 36, 491 , 493, 494, 495, बागजाता खान के प्लाट नंबर

5. मुख्य अधीक्षक ( खान ) , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड

(बागजाता, मौजा) :

6. उप प्रबंधक ( सुरक्षा ) , यूरेनियम कारपोरेशन आफ इंडिया लिमिटेड

26, 27, 31 , 32, 34, 35 , 37, 38, 39 , 40, 41 , 43 , 44, 45,46, 245, 244,246,258,259,254,257,243 , 247, 248 , 241 , 240, 249, 253, 251 , 256, 250, 264, 265 , 266, 267,276,275, 274, 270, 273 , 272, 269, 268 , 308, 307 , 306 , 305 , 304 , 284 , 283,286,282,281,280,277,278 , 279, 236, 237, 239, 238, 287, 288, 303 , 309 , 289 , 292 ,233 , 284, 228 , 224, 227 , 225, 216, 215, 201 , 199, 457, 459, 25, 55, 52, 50, 51 , 49 ,48, 47, 235,484, 29 .

[फा. सं. एईए/ 19 ( 1 )/2007- ईआर] ए. गीतेश शर्मा , संयुक्त सचिव

DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY ORDER Mumbai , the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2785. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 ( 33 of 1962), the CentralGovernment hereby directs that the powers conferred on it by section 19 ofthe said Act shall , in respect of the areas specified in column (2) of the Schedule annexed hereto, being prohibited areas , be exercisabie also by all or any of the officers or authorities mentioned in the corresponding entries in column (3 ) of the said Schedule .

SCHEDULE

Designation ofthe Officer or Authority Sl .No. Name of the prohibited area

(1)

(3)

(2)

1. Bagjata Uranium Mine of Uranium Corporation 1. Chairman and Managing Director , Uranium Corporation of India Limited.

2. Director (Technical ) , Uranium Corporation of India Limited,

3. General Manager(Pers, ), Uranium Corporation of IndiaLimited,

of India Limited , Dist . East Singhbhum , Jharkhand covered by the following Plot Nos . Plot Nos , of Bagjata Mine ( Phulzhari Mouza) 484, 485 , 486, 489 , 488 , 458, 490 , 492 , 501 , 500, 499, 498 , 497 , 496 , 512, 511 , 513 , 514 , 515 , 516 , 517 ,691 , 42 , 28 , 30 , 33, 36, 491 , 493 , 494,495,

4. General Manager (Mines), Uranium Corporation of IndiaLimited,

5. Chief Superintendent ( Mines), Uranium Corporation ofIndia Limited,

6. DeputyManager (Security), Uranium Corporation ofIndia Limited,

Plot Nos , of Bagjata Mine ( Bagjata Mouza): 26, 27 , 31 , 32, 34, 35, 37, 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 43,44, 45,46, 245, 244 , 246, 258 , 259, 254, 257 , 243 , 247, 248 , 241 , 240 , 249 , 253 , 251 , 256 , 250 , 264, 265 , 266 , 267 , 276 , 275 , 274 , 270 , 273 , 272, 269 , 268 , 308 , 307 , 306, 305 , 304, 284, 283 , 286 , 282 , 281 , 280 , 277 , 278 , 279 , 236, 237, 239 , 238 , 287 , 288 , 303 , 309, 289 , 292, 233 , 284 , 228 , 224 , 227 , 225 , 216 , 215 , 201 , 199, 457 , 459 , 25 , 55 , 52 , 50 , 51 , 49 , 48 , 47 , 235,484, 29 .

[F. No. AEA/ 19 ( 1 )/2007 -ER] A. GITESH SARMA, Jt . Secy.

6090

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2786.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्दर्न रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 13/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -41012/226/2003- आई आर ( बी-I ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

charge sheet was sent at his residential address . He received the charge sheet , but opted not to respond it . Thereafter communications were sent, which were received back undelivered with the remarks that despite various visits Munni Ram was not available . It came to light that he was serving somewhere , awayfrom his village . Enquiry was conducted ex parte and Munni Ram was dismissed vide order dated 5th of December, 1990. After a long gap Munni Ram approached his employer and him to allow him tojoin his duties . His request was declined . He raised and industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer . Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal vide Order No. L-41012/ 226/2003 - IR (B - I) dated 30-1-2004, with following terms :

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

NewDelhi , the 8th September, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Northern Railway ( Asstt . Mechanical Engineer , Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , New Delhi ) of removal from service of Shri Munni Ram S/o Shri Tek Chand, Diesel Khalasi isjust, fair and legal ? If not what relief the workman is entitled to and from what date ?" .

S.O. 2786.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court - 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the IndustrialDispute between the management of Northern Railway and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 8-9-2009.

[No. L-41012/226/2003- IR (B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT-1 , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 13/2004

Shri Munni Ram , S/ o Shri Tek Chand, Village and Post Office Atta, Tehsil Samalkha,

. Workman

Distt. Panipat, Haryana

Versus

2. Claim statement was filed by Munni Ram , pleading therein that he was employed as Diesel Khalasi at Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti, Delhi , as casual labour w.e.f. 12-3-76 to 11-4-78 . He was brought on regular panel ofDiesel Khalasi on 12-4-78 , where he worked till the date when his services were terminated . He presents that his services were terminated by the management on 5-12-90 without any notice, charge sheet or enquiry . He enumerates that he went to his native vllage Atta, Tehsil Smalkha , district Panipat, Haryana, on 23-6-86 , after getting leave sanctioned for 6 days, besides weekly rest for 29th ofJune, 1986. with permission to leave the station . He presents that no communication was ever served upon him , not to talk of serving any charge sheet, notice or order imposing penalty upon him . He unfolds that when he came to know that his services were dismissed , he preferred and appeal which was rejected on 31-1-2000 , being barred by time. According to him, the enquiry was in violaton ofprinciples of natural justice, which was based on extraneous considerations . No evidence was there on records against him. No opportunity was given to him to defend himself. The decisiontakenby the Disciplinary Authority was not based on any material. He presents that his services were terminated in illegal manner , without any notice , charge sheet or enquiry. He claim reinstatement in service , with continuity and full back wages .

TheAssistant Mechanical Engineer , DSL, Shakur Basti , Northern Railway, Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , NewDelhi .

.Management

AWARD

3. Management demurred the claim pleading that Munni Ram was engaged as casual labour on 12-3-76 and subsequently he was appointed as a substitute Khalasi in Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , Northern Railway , Delhi , on 12-4-78 . In 1981 a screening of substitutes for absorption against regular post was conducted by a committee of three officers , as a result of which he was included in the list of thepersons placed on provisional screening panel ofDiesel Munni Ram, who was working as Diesel Khalasi at Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , went to his native village in June , 1986 , after getting leaves sanctioned w.e.f. 23rd of June, 86 to 28th of June, 86. He opted not to report for his duties thereafter. Various communications were sent to him , but to no avail . Adepartmental enquiry was initiated and 6091 [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

Khalasi. Heworked as Diesel Khalasi from 12-4-78 till 1986.

The said letter was received back undelivered with the remarks that he was residing somewhere away from the village. The Disciplinary Authority decided to impose penalty of removal from service and, therefore , he was removed from service w.e.f. 5-11-90. Copy of the said order was sent to him by registered cover, which was also received back undelivered with the same remarks , as referred above. A copy of removal order was pasted on the notice board of the shed on 28-12-90 in the presence of three employees . The enquiy was conducted against him according to rules. On 11-12-2000 he sent an appeal before the Appellate Authority, which was dismissed being barred by time. A claim was made that the workman is not entitled forreinstatment in service .

4. Workman tendered his affidavit in his evidence . Hewas cross-examined on behalf of the management . Shri A.K. Srivastava, Assistant Divisional Mechanical Engineer, tendered his affidavit on behalf of the management , who was cross-examined on behalf of the workman . No other witness was examined by either of the parties .

5. Arguments were heard at the bar. Workman presented facts in person . Shri H.L. Nanda A/R raised his submissions on behalf of the management. I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

6. Munni Ram swears in his affidavit that he served as casual labour at Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , from 12-3-76 to11-4-78 . He became Diesel Khalasi on 12-4-78 and worked assuch for about 8 years . He was sanctioned leave on 23-6-86 till 28-6-86 besides weekly rest for 29-6-86, with permission to leave for his native village Atta , Tehsil Panipat, District Panipat , Haryana . No communication was received by him purporting to be a notice or service of charge sheet on him . He had not received any communication concerning eriquiry being conducted. He hadnot received any information that enquiry was being conducted ex parte. Finding of the enquiry officer and notice of intention to impose penalty of removal was not served upon him. He had rendered meritorious service with the management. Later on he came to know that his services have been terminated without granting any reasonable opportunity to defence himself. He projects that charge sheetwas served upon one Mani Ram and not on him . He filed an appeal on 11-12-2000 but it was rejected on 31-1-2000 being barred by time . He presents that it was Mani Ram who was proceeded departmentally and under these circumstances no opportunity was granted to him to defendhimselfbefore the Enquiry Officer.

On 23-6-86 he proceeded on leave for six days withweekly rest on 29-6-86. He was to report for his duty on 30-6-86. Instead of reporting for duty he absented himself from his duties, without any intimation . From 30-6-86 till 8th of February, 90 neither he reported for duty nor sent any intimation to his office about his absence . Charge sheet was issuedto him on 8-2-90 for remaining unauthorisedly absent from duty, which was sent at his native village Atta, Tehsil Panipat, District Karnal , Haryana. Which was duly acknowledged by him as per A.D. card received from postal authorities . After receipt of the charge sheet he failed to submithis written statement or defence, even after expiry ofmore than 10 days . The Disciplinary Authority decided to appoint an Enquiry Officer to enquire into article of charges . Consequently Shri N.N. Sharma was appointed asEnquiry Officer vide letter dated 23-3-90, copy ofwhich was sent to him at the aforesaid address, under registered cover. It was received back undelivered with the remarks from postal authorities that despite various visits addressee was not available. It came to light that he was living somewhere without a known destination. Meanwhile Shri N.N. Sharmawas transferred and Shri Rishi Prakash Sharma was appointed Enquiry Officer in his place vide order dated 26-5-90 . Copy of the said order was sent by registered post, but it was also received undelivered with the remarks that despite various visits addressee was not available . It came to light that he wss serving somewhere. He was further informed vide letter dated 20-6-90 that he can nominate his defence helper, which letter was also received back undelivered with the remarks that he was residing somewhere away from the village, while his family members told the postman that postal article may be sent back . Constrained with these facts Enquiry Officer fixed the enquiry on 21st ofJuly, 90 at Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti and letter dated 13th of July was sent to the workman under registered cover. It was received back with the remarks that hewas residing somewhere from the village and his family members did not disclose his address. The Enquiry Officer got a notice pasted on notice board of the shed in presence oftwo employees . Another date of enquiry was fixed for 29-9-90, which fact was informed to him vide letter dated 15-9-90 sent by registered post . He was advised to attend enquiry but he did not attend the same. The said letter was also received back undelivered with the same remarks as referred above . Letter dated 22-9-90 was sentby the Enquiry Officer calling upon the workman to attend the enquiry on 1-10-90 instead of 29-9-90 but the said letter was also received back undelivered with the same remarks , referred above. Since the workman did not participate the enquiry, theEnquiryOfficer was constrained to conclude it ex parte. He submitteed his report to the Disciplinay Authority, copy of which report was sent to him by the Disciplinary Authority, vide letter dated 31-10-90 advising him to make arepresentation on the said report .

7. During the course of his cross-examination he concedes that charge sheet was received by him, to which he had not furnished any reply. He admits that his father's name is Tek Chand, who is resident ofvillage Atta, District Panipat, Haryana. He concedes that his name is mentioned 6092

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

Officer is exonerated of his duty to give a reasonable opportunity to delinquent official concerned. Law to this effect was laid in Joseph John 1956 ( 1 ) LLJ 239 .

in the charge sheet as Mani Ram and not as Munni Ram , Therefore, out of facts projected by Munni Ram it cameto light that he wants to raise a dispute as to the identity of the person, who was proceeded departmentally, claiming thatit was sent on one Mani Ram and not him.

10. When the workman did not avail the opportunity then subsequently he cannot challenge the enquiry which was continued in his absence , claming it to be violative of principles of natural justice . If a workman intentionally refusedto participate in the enquiry he cannot complain that his dismissal is against principles of natural justice . Law to this effect was laid in Sadul Textiles Mills Limited [ 1957 ( 1 ) LLJ 572] , Bagchi (P.N. ) & Co. Private Limited[ 1959 ( 1 ) LLJ 605 ] , Muir Mills Company Limited (24 FJR 123 ) , MajorU.R. Bhatnagar [ 1965 ( 1 ) LLJ 656 ] , Ghansham Dass Srivastava (1968 2 LLJ 246) and Laxmi Devi Sugar Mills [1957( 1) LLJ 17] .

11. Normally in a judicial proceedings a party is not tobe heard who absents himself from the hearing and ifthe quasi judicial authority holds proceedings ex parte in such a case , then it will not amount to misconduct on his part. Lawto this effect was laid in S. Govinda Menon [ 1973 (2 ) LLJ 369] . In view of these proposition of law, it is crystal clear that the Enquiry Officer is not guilty ofviolating the principles of natural justice . The Disciplinary Authority tried to seek an explanation of the workman but he could not succeed, since the workman had decided not to respond to the communications sent by the Disciplinary Authority or the Enquiry Officer. Under these circumstances it was beyond the competence of the authorities to accord and opportunity ofbeing heard to the workman .

8. Shri A.K. Srivastava swears that when the workman opted not to join his duties from 30-6-86 till 8-2-90, it was decided to initiate a departmental enquiry against him, for his unauthorized absence from duty. Charge sheet was sent to him at his address at village Atta , Tehsil Panipat , District Karnal , Haryana , which was duly acknowledged by him . He had not submitted any explanation to that charge sheet . Shri N.N. Sharma was appointed as Enquiry Officer, which fact was communicated to him vide letter dated 31-2-90 . Since Shri N.N. Sharma was transferred, Shri Rishi Prakash Sharma was appointed asEnquiry Officer vide letter dated 26-5-90, which fact was also communicated to him by registered post. The Enquiry Officer informed the workman time to time by registered letters about the progress of the enquiry, which letters were received back undelivered with the report that he was staying away from his village and his family members were not willing to tell his whereabouts . Since the workman had not responded to the communication sent by the Enquiry Officer, he was constrained to proceed him ex parte . He conducted the enquiry and submitted his report dated 31-10-90 to the Disciplinary Authority. The Disciplinary Authority sent a notice to show cause against the proposed penalty of removal . That communication was also received back undelivered . Ultimately the Disciplinary Authority passed order dated 5-12-90 removing the workman from his services . Copy of removal order was pasted on the notice board on 28-12-90. Even after removal of his services he had not contacted the authorities to appraise them about his problem for remaining absent from hisduties for years together. After a gap of ten years from his removal, he presented an appeal which was declined as barredby time .

12. Document Ex. WW1/ 9 speaks of a situation , which project hollowness of his claim . This document was writtenby theworkman himself, wherein he admits that on leavehe went tohis native village where he became insane. He projects therein that he lost his memory and started roaming hither and thither. He roamed about 10-11 years and thereafter he gained sanity. He came to Diesel Shed, Shakur Basti , Delhi , where he was not allowed to resume hisduty. Therefore, out of Ex. WW/ 1/9 it is evident that the workman claims responsibility of not joining the duties, despite various communications sent to him . He tried to create alibi that on account of insanity of mind he was away from his house for more than 10-11 years . Contents of Ex. WW 1/9 are nothing but an after - thought , since he admits the receipt of charge sheet in his testimony. therefore, it isemerging over the record that for reasons best known to the workman he opted not to report for his duties . He took a decision not to participate in the Enquiry and notto offer any explanation to notice sent of proposed penalty of hisremoval from service . Under these circumstances it does not lie in his mouth to claim that the enquiry was violative ofprinciples of natural justice and punishment awarded to him is not proportionate to his misconduct .

13. Action of the management of Northem Railway of removal from service of Munni Ram is found to be just, 9. Out offacts unfolded by the workman as well as Shri H.L. Nanda it came to light that the workman left for his native village on 23-6-86 after getting leave for six days sanctioned. He was to avail 29th of June , 89 as his weekly rest and then to join his duties on 30th of June , 86 . Thereafter he remained absent till 8th of February, 90 , when a departmental enquiry was initiated against him . Charge sheet was sent to him which was received by him but he opted not to offer an explanation to it . Various communications, sent to him at his native place , were received back undelivered with the remarks that he was staying somewhere away from his village and his family members were not ready to disclose his whereabouts . Under these circumstnaces , a departmental enquiry was initiated against him ex parte . It emerge over the record that opportunity to show cause was given to the workman by the Enquiry Officer . Under these circumstances the Enquiry [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

fair and legal . Workman is not entitled to any relief. An Award is , accordingly, passed.

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 8 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2787.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट, औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 30/2009 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 8-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-12011 /79/2008- आई आर ( बी- I ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 8th September, 2009 S.O. 2787.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/ 2009) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court - 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 8-9-2009 .

[No. L- 12011/79/2008- IR(B -I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K., YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1, NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 30/2009

Shri Prem Singh,

Through The General Secretary, TradeUnion Council , INTUC , B-2/ 16 , Ashiyana Colony, Vivekanand Hospital , Kanth Road,

6093

AWARD

Prem Singh was appointed as Assistant Cashier- cum-Clerk in Badaun Branch of State Bank of India on 22ndofDecember, 1981. In 1988 he was transferred to Nagina Branch ofthebank . He was again transferred to Boodenpur (Bijnore) branch of the bank in 1995. He was placed under suspension on 4-8-97 . A departmental enquiry was conducted against him , since he had perpetrated a fraud at the aforesaid branch of the bank . He was found guilty of the charges and compulsorily retired on 16th of January, 2003, while his period of suspenson was treated as not spent on duty.He raised a claim for sanctioning pension in hisfavour, which was declined. He raised a disputebefore the Conciliaton Officer. Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal vide Order No. L- 12011/79/2008 -IR (B-I) dated 1-7-2009, with following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in not sanctioning pensionary benefits to the concerned workman Shri Prem Singh, Asstt. Cashier-cum-Clerk retired compulsorily from service w.e.f. 16-1-2003 , is legal and; justified ? Ifnot, to what relief he is entitled to from which date ?" 2. Claim statement was filed by the workman, pleading there is that he was employed with the management bank as Assistant Cashier- cum -clerk on 22-12-81 . He was transferred to Nagina Branch and thereafterto Boodenpur (Bijnor ) branch of the bank in 1995. Hewas lastly transferred to Dwar Hatt, Almora branch of the bank in 1977. He was suspended in 1997. By initiating ex parte proceedings against him, he was compulsorily retired vide order dated 16-1-2003 . Though the bank had made payment of his dues upto 2003 , yet his pension benefits were not released. He presents that his period of suspension may be treated as spent on duty and bank may be directed to sanction pensonary benefits in his favour.

Workman

Moradabad (U.P. )

Versus

The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office 1, New Cantt . Road, Dehradun

RegionalManager, StateBank of India, Region- IV, Hotel Sikhar, Almora

.Management

3.Contest was given to his claim by the management pleading that since workman committed a fraud in the bank, he was placed under suspension on 4-8-97 . Chargesheet was served upon him on 22-11-97 . Departmental enquiry was conducted and charges stood proved against him . Enquiry Officer submitted his report dated 29-1-2001 and Disciplinary Authority found him guilty of gross misconduct . Vide order dated 16-1-2003 he inflicted punishment of compulsory retirement on the workman and the period of his suspension from 4-8-97 to 16-1-2003 was treated as not spent on duty. As per the provisions of State Bank of India Employees Pension Fund Rules (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) suspension period from 4-8-97 to 16-1-2003 cannot be counted as pensionable service. An employee has to complete 20 years of qualifying service for release of pension in his favour. Since the workmanhas rendered only 15 years 8 months and 13 days service, pension could not be released in his favour . Claim 6094

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] projected by the workman is not in consonance with the Rules . He is not entitled to any benefit towards pension.

4. Order dated 16-1-2003 was not disputed by the workman. Hence the same is exhibited as Ex . M - 1 . The Ruleswere filed by the bank, which were also not disputed by the workman. Hence same were exhibited as Ex . M-2 . Workman as well as the management opted not to lead any evidence over the matter . Therefore , evidence of the parties was closed .

9. In the dispute under reference the Tribunal is not competent to gobehind the order dated 16-1-2003 . It cannot enquire into about legality and justifiability of the order, on the strength of which he was compulsorily retired and his period of suspension was treated as not spent on duty. Consequently the Tribunal has to assess the action of the management on the basis of the Rules Ex . M - 2 which provides for sanction ofpensionary benefits to the workman on rendering 20 years qualifying service . He has not rendered 20 years qualifying service to earn pension. Since he has not reached 60 years of age , hence he cannot get pension on rendering 10 years qualifying service. Consequentlyhe is not entitled to any relief. Reference is answered accordingly and an Award is , hereby, accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

5. Arguments were heard at the bar . Workman, assisted by Shri S.K. Sharma, his A/R, raised submissions in the matter. Shri Rajat Arora A/R raised submissions on behalf of the Management . I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on the issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2788.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 343/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

6. Ex . M- 1 announces that Prem Singh , Assistant Cashier- cum-Clerk , under suspension was ordered to be compulsorily retired and his period of suspension was not to count for any wages , increment , seniority and bonus etc. , except the subsistence allowance already paid to him. Consequently it is evident that the Disciplinary Authority ordered for compulsory retirement of the workman w.e.f. 16-1-2003 , with directions that his period of suspension from 4-8-97 till 16-1-2003 will not earn him any wages , increment, seniority, bonus etc. Consequently it is evident that the said period was not treated as spent on duty.

[सं. एल-20012/ 357/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 9th September, 2009 7. Admittedly workman joined services of the bank on 22-12-81 . He was compulsorily retired on 16-1-2003. Period of suspension w.e.f. 4-8-97 till 16-1-2003 was not treated as spent on duty. Therefore , the workman performed qualifying service for 15 years , 8 months and 13 days only .

S.O. 2788.- In pursuancersuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 343/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/ s . C.C.L. and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 9-9-2009 .

[No. L- 20012/357/2000- IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1) , DHANBAD

In the matter of a reference under Section 10( 1 ) ( d) and(2A) of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Reference No. 343 of 2009

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of HazaribaghArea of M/s . CCL . AND Theirworkman

8. The Rules contemplates that an employee shall be eligible for pension after having completed 20 years pensionary service provided that he has attained the age of 50 years . As detailed workman has not completed 20 years qualifying service . In case he is on service in the bank on or after 1-11-93 , he is entitled for pension on completion of 10 years qualifying service provided that he has attained the age of 58 years . In the other eventuality if the employee is in the service in the bank on or after 22-5-98, he would be eligible for pension on completion of 10 years service provided he has attained the age of 60 years . It is not the case of the workman that he had attained the age of60 years and rendered 10 years qualifying service to get pensionary benefits . Under these circumstances workman has not been able to show that he has renderedqualifying service to earn pensionary benefits . Consequently no illegality or unjustifiability in the action ofthe management , in not sanctioning pensionary benefits to the wokman, was brought over the record . Therefore , the action of the management is found to be legal and justified.

6095 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

PRESENT:

Sri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES

ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial disputebetween the employers in relationto the management of M/s . BCCL and their workman, whichwas receivedby the Central Government on9-9-2009.

For the Employers

: Shri D. K. Verma, Adv.

For the Workman

: None

[No. L-20012/309/2001 - IR(C-1 )) SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer State:Jharkhand

: Industry: Coal

ANNEXURE

Dated, 29th November, 2009

AWARD

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , DHANBAD

Inthe matterof a reference under U/s . 10( 1 )( d) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 220 of2001

PARTIES:

By Order No. L- 20012/ 357/2000 ( C- 1 ) dated 29-11-2009, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferredby clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute foradjudication to this Tribunal:

Employers in relation to the management ofMoonidih Area ofM/ s . B.C.C. Ltd. AND

"Whether the action of the management of C.C. Ltd. , Hazaribagh Area , P.O. Charhi , Distt. Hazaribagh in dismissing Sri Chutter Ganjhu from service w.e.f. 14-2-94 is justified ? If not, to what reliefis the workman concerned entitled " ?

Theirworkman

PRESENT:

Sri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployers

This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 26-12-2000. Thereafter, notices were sent to both the parties for filing ofwritten statement. In spite of notices sent for the filing ofWritten Statement, no written statement has been filed by the workman/ sponsoring union till 26-12-2000.

: Shri D. K. Verma, Advocate

For the Workman

It therefore, appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case.

Shri N.G. Arun, Authorised Representative, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh.

In such circumstances , I render a NO DISPUTE AWARD in this reference case.

State: Jharkhand

Industry:Coal H.M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

Dated, the 28th August, 2009

नई दिल्ली , 9 सितम्बर, 2009

AWARD

By Order No. L- 20012/309/2001 - IR ( C - 1 ) dated 27-9-2001 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - section ( 2A) of Section 10 of IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudicationto this Tribunal:

का. आ. 2789.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणाश्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 220/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ

[सं. एल-20012/309/2001-आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्कअधिकारी

"Whether the action of the management of M/s.Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. in accepting thedate ofbirth ofyear 1945 instead of 1948 of Shri Jagdish Yadav is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, what relief is the concernedworkman is entitled to" ?

NewDelhi , the 9th September, 2009

2. Thewritten statement has been filed on behalf of the concerned workman stating that Jagdish Yadav, concerned workman, Card No. 337 Tyndal, presently working at Moonidih Coal Washery, was initially under the S.O. 2789.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 220/2001)

3540GI /2009-14 6096

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

as 31-1-45 and thereby the service of above workman has been reduced by three years . If the above date of birth is taken for granted as decided by the management , Sri Jagdish Yadav will retire on 31-1-2005 instead of 1-7-2008 . In Form ' B ' Register of Muraidih colliery the date of birth of Sri Yadav has been mentioned as 28 years in 1976 which was communicated to Kessargarh colliery and further to Moonidih CoalWashery after the transfer of Jagdish Yadav. Themanagement has taken whimsical and arbitrary action for reducing the service of Sri Jagdish Yadav by three years and for that the management has not indicated any reasonable ground based on which it has arrived at such conclusion . The action of the management is totally illegal , arbitrary , unjustified and bad in law.

It has been prayed before this Hon'ble Tribunal to answer the reference in favour of the union and the workman as the action of the management of Moonidih Coal Washery ofWestem Washery Zone in changing the date of birth of the concerned workman from 1-7-1948 to 31-1-1945 is erroneous and arbitrary and pass an award directing the employer to accept the date ofbirth of Jagdish Yadav as 1-7-48 and reinstate him with full back wages .

3. The management has filed written statement stating thatthe date ofbirth and other particulars of the workman ofM/s . BCCI, have been computerised and according to the record NEIS EDP , Koyla Bhawan the date ofbirth ofthe workmanconcerned is 1-7-40 . According to the aforesaid date of birth the workman concerned is entitled for retirement w.e.f. 1-7-2000 . After receiving the information fromthe Headquarters the management issued a notice of superannuationto workman concerned w.e.f. 1-7-2000 and after receiving the notice of superannuation the concerned workman raised an objection regarding his date of birth recorded in NEIS EDP Section , Koyla Bhawan . After receiving the objection from the workman concernedthe management examined all the relevant documents in respect of the workman concerned and found that at the time of appointment his date of birth was not recorded . The workman concerned was transferred from original place and the management examined all the documents and found that the date of birth of the concerned workman was recorded in Form ' B' Register of Muraidih Colliery as 31-1-1945 . After considering the representation of the workmanconcerned and Form ' B ' Register of Muraidih Colliery the date of birth committee accepted the date of birth of the workman concerned as 31-1-1945 and accordingly his date of birth was corrected in all relevant documents as 31-1-1945 . After correction of the date of birth of the concerned workman from 1-7-40 to 31-1-1945 , he was allowed to resume his duty.

It has been prayed before this Tribunal to pass an award holding that the action of the management is legal andjustified and the concerned workman is not entitled to any relief.

employment of a Raising Contractor of Muraidih Colliery. The aforesaid colliery was nationalised in the year 1973 and was merged with M/ s . BCCL and the service of Jagdish Yadavwas also taken over and he became the employee of BCCL having date of his appointment as 31-1-1973 . After his employment in BCCL the name of Jagdish Yadav was inserted in all the records including the statutory Form ' B' register ofMuraidih colliery and in all the records his date ofappointment was mentioned as 31-1-1973. But the age was not assessed immediately and his date of birth was not mentioned in any record at that time . His age was determined in the year 1976 along with others . In that exercise the age of Jagdish Yadav, who was then a Quarry labour, was determined by the authorised persons of the management as 28 years in 1976 and accordingly it was recorded in Form ' B ' Register as well as Identity Card Register. He was also issued identity card in the year 1979 by the management of Muraidih colliery wherein his date ofbirthhas been mentioned as 28 years in 1976. In BCCL the retirement ofWage Board employee on superannuation takes place after completion of 60 years of age . As per the provision prevalent in BCCL ifthere is no particular date of birth and it is only year as the age of any worker, the middle of the year i.e. 1st July is taken for recording the specific date of birth. Accordingly , the date of birth of Jagdish Yadavmaybe said to be 1st July, 1948 and on calculation he will attain the age of superannuation on 1st July , 2008 . In the year 1981 Jagdish Yadav was transferred to Kessargarh colliery ofArea- I (BaroraArea) and due to that hisservice records were also transferred to the aforesaid colliery. Further he was transferred to Moonidih Coal Washery in the same year . The management of Kessargarh colliery sent the L.P.C. and service file to Moonidih Coal Washery and based on the said L.P.C. the date ofbirth of the concerned workman was recorded as 28 years in 1976 inall the records including the Form 'B ' register of above CoalWahery. Sri Yadav was issued Identity Card by the authority ofMoonidih Coal Washery wherein his date of birth hasbeen indicated as 28 years as on 1-1-1976 . He had also filled up the service excerpt in 1987 wherein he has mentioned his date of birth as 1-1-1976 at the instance of the concerned authority of Moonidih Washery management, which was verified by the Dy . Personriel Manager ofMoonidih Coal Washery . As per all the records ofMoonidih Washery containing the date of birth of Jagdish Yadav he should retire on superannuation on 1-7-2008 , but the Project Officer , Moonidih Coal Washery in a very arbitrary and whimsical manner issued an impugned order dated 3-6-2000 and Sri Yadav was stopped from work w.e.f. 1-7-2000 which was totally unjustified and not tenable. On his representation before the management against that illegal order , he was again allowed to resume his duty w.e.f. 15-12-2000 vide letter dated 15-12-2000 issued bythe ProjectOfficer, Moonidih Coal Washery . But to utter surprise , it was seen that the management has in a most unreasonable manner changed the date ofbirth of Sri Yadav 6097 [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs of each other's written statement.

5.The management has produced MW - 1-Ramjee Singh and he has stated in examination- in - chief that "At present I am working as Personnel Manager in Muraidih Colliery. The concerned workman was also working in that colliery.Hewas appointred in that colliery in the year 1973, Form 'B' Register was being maintained at Muraidih Colliery. The original Form ' B ' Register of Muraidih colliery has beenmisplaced in the year 1978. This is the zerox copy of that Form ' B ' Register . The name of the concerned workman, Jagdish Yadav finds place in Sl . No. 846. As per this register his age has been recorded as 28 years in the year 1976. " He has proved Form 'B ' which has been marked 'X' for identification ."

order dated 21-11-2003 issued under the signature of Dy . C.P.M. , Moonidih Coal Washery (Ext. W -4) . In the year 2004 a seniority list ofTyndal was published and circulated under the signature of Project Officer , Moonidih Coal Washery by office order No. BCCL/PD/Seniority list/ Moonidih Coal Washery prayer/2004/735 dated 14-7-2004 wherein the date of birth of the concerned workman has been shown as 1-1-1948 at serial No. 9 (Ext. W-5). The officer of Moonidih Coal Washery in his letter No. BCCL/ PD/Moonidih Coal Washery/2004/3060 dated 21-12-2004 addressed to Dy . Chief Personnel Manager , Western Washery Zone, Mohuda has clearly stated that in their statutory recordthe date ofbirth of the concerned workman in Form 'B' is recorded as 28 years on 15-1-1976 , which means his date of birth is 15-1-1948 and considering the dateofbirth recorded in the statutory record the workman shallhavebeen completing 60 years on 14-1-2008, The concerned workman has produced himself, who has stated in examination - in - chief that he was initially an employee ofa Raising Contractor of Muraidih.colliery. Later on, Muraidih Colliery was nationalised in the year 1973 andmerged with BCCL. At the time of nationalisation of CoalMines in 1973 his service was also taken over alongwith others and become employee of M/s . BCCL on and from 31-1-73. At the time of take over his age was not recorded inany official record. In the year 1976 his age was assessed alongwith other co- workers by the competent authorities and it was determined 28 years in 1976. He further stated thathis determined age was recorded in all official recorda ofMuraidih Colliery. In the year 1981 he was transferredto Kasergarh Colliery and subsequently to Moonidih Coal Washery. On the basis of L.P.C. sent by his previous place ofposting the management of Moonidih Coal Washery recorded in their all official records his age as 28years as on 1-1-1976 . Accordingly, the management had issued him service. At the time of his promotion the management ofMoonidih Coal Washery issued him letter dated 10/14-7-2004 whereby and whereunder his age is shown as 1-1-1948. His prayer is for reinstatement in service from the date of his illegal stoppage with back wages and other fringe and consequential benefits .

Ithas also been argued that the concerned workman waspreviously employed at Muraidih colliery and when he was transferred to Moonidih Coal Washery , the management Muraidih colliery had sent all the records of the concerned workman to Moonidih Coal Washery, but he has been superannuated three years earlier as per Ext. W-6. Ext. W- 7 shows the family details of the concerned workman wherein it is shown that his elder brother , Ramchandra Yadav who was an employee of Moonidih CoalWashery had completed 60 years on 7-1-2006 . Ext . W-8 which is a superannuation notice served to Ramchandra Yadav, elder brother of the concrened workman shows that the date of birth of Ramchandra Yadav is 1-1-1946. In that case also it cannot be said that his date of birth is31-1-1945 , it must be after 1946 because his elder brother has completed 60 years on 7-1-2006 . The management's witness MW- 1 has stated voluntraily that the age of the concerned workman has been recorded as 28 years in the year 1976 as per the Form ' B ' of Muraidih Colliery which is shown at serial No. 846 and he was appointed in the year 1973. He has also produced Form 'B ' before the court. As per the statutory record of initial appointment of the concerned workman his date of birth should be 1-7-1948 because it is decided in JBCCI clause implementation instruction 76 and as per Certified Standing Orderapplicable in M/ s . BCCL that where exact date of birth isnot available and the year ofbirth is only established then the 1st July of the said year shall be taken as the date ofbirth.

7. As per Form 'B ' Register , which is a statutory record as per Mines Act, 1952 , at the time of initial appointment ofthe concerned workman, his date ofbirth wasrecorded as 28 years in the year 1976 which means the yearofbirth ofthe workman is 1948 and as per guideline of the certificed standing order and implementation instruction no . 76 of JBCCI the date ofbirth shall be treated as 1-7-48 . It only shows that the concerned workman was superannuated in the year 2005 without considering his 6. Main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman is that his date of birth , as per Company's Act, is 15-1-1976 because his age has been assessed by the management in his Form ' B ' Register , which ismarked ' X ' for identification , is 28 years in the year 1976 . It has been argued that he was employed at Muraidih Colliery and later on he was transferred to Moonidih Coal Washery and the date of birth of the concerned workman had been recorded in all the records as 28 years as on 1-1-96 . Service excerpt has been issued to him by the Moonidih Coal Washery in the year 1987, marked Ext . W- 2 and Identity Card which has also been issued shows his age as 28 years as on 1-1-1976 i.e. 1-1-1948 , Ext . W-3 . He wasupgraded under the provision of S.L.U. vide office 6098

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ASVINA 18, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(i))

the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management ofM/s . BCCL and their workman, which wasreceivedbythe Central Government on 9-9-2009.

dateofbirth as per Form ' B ' Register when he was initially appointed. This action of the management is declaredto beunjustified.

[No. L-20012/505/2000- IR(C-I)] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Offioer

ANNEXURE

8. The management argued that as the concerned workman raised the issue at a late stage, so he referred 2008 (4) JJR 149 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that the dispute at late stage be not considered, if there is no variation in the record.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. I, DHANBAD

Inthematter ofa reference U/S. 10 ( 1 ) (d) (2A) ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 94 of2003

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Kustore Area ofM/s . Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

AND

Their Workmen

Present: Shri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer In the present case in all the records of the management the date of birth of the concerned workman has beenmentioned on 1-7-1948. Apart from that Ext. W-7 family details of the concerned workman shows that his elder brother, who was an employee of Moonidih Coal Washery had completed 60 years on 1-1-2006 and Ext . W-8 which is a superannuation notice ofhis elder brother shows the date of birth of his elder brother, Ramchandra Yadav is 1-1-1946 , as the date of birth of the concerned workman should not be in the year 1945 and it will be 1-7-1948 and not 1-7-1945.

APPEARANCES

Forthe Employers

: Shri D. K.Verma, Advocate .

Forthe Workmen

: Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate.

State: Jharkhand

Industry:Coal

Dated, the 27thAugust, 2009

AWARD

9. Inview ofthe discussions made above, I come to the conclusion that the action of the management of M/s . B.C.C. Ltd. in accepting the date ofbirth of the year 1945 instead of 1948 of Jagdish Yadav is not legal and justified. Therefore, the managment is directed to accept thedate ofbirth ofthe concerned workman as 1-7-1948 and accordingly pay full back wages and other consequential benefits ofNCWA- VI , VII and VIII for the period between 1-2-2005 to 1-7-2008 as because he was illegally and arbitrarily stopped from duty w.e.f. 1-2-2005 . The management is also directed to implement the award within 30days from the date ofaward.

Thisismyaward.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

By Order No. L- 20012/505 /2000- IR(C- I ) dated 22-8-2003 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section ( 1 ) and sub - sec . (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute foradjudication to this Tribunal:

नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर, 2009

"Whether the demand of Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management ofKustore Area for regularisation/ permanent to Sri Ashok Ram and 29 others as per annexure is legal and justified ? Ifso, what relief the concerned workmen are entitled and from which date ?"

LIST OF WORKMEN

1. Shri Ashok Ram

का. आ. 2790.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी. सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 94/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

2. Shri Paras Ram

3. Shambhu Prasad

[सं. एल-20012/505/2000- आई. आर. (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

4. SanjayKumar

NewDelhi , the 9th September, 2009

5. Prem Chand Sahu

6. UpendraKumar

7. Rajander Ram

8. RamKarRam

S.O. 2790.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 94/ 2003)oftheCentral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure in 6099 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

9. N. Shambhu Ram

10. RamashrayRam

11. Pradeep Kumar Joshi

12. Houlder Ram

13. Subedar Ram

14. Gurbari Ram

15. Rakesh Ram

16. Radhe Ram

17. Subachan Ram

18. Shri Ram

19. Rajinder PrasadRam

20. Jai Shri Ram

21. GuduRam

22. Samaru Ram

23. Dharam DevRam

24. OmPrakash Ram

prevailing rate ofwages in the name of intermediaries . The disbursement of wages in the name of intermediaries was nothing but a legal camouflage . The concerned workmen approachedbefore the management several times for their regularisation and wages as per NCWA but without any effect. The repeated insistence for regularisation had annoyed the management to the extent of terminating the services ofthe concerned workmen w.e.f. January, 1995 by stopping them from work without assigning any reason andwithout complying the mandatory provision of law. After exhausting all avenues for amicable settlement the union raised an industrial dispute regarding the concerned workmenwhich ended in failure . The Govt. rejected the dispute illegally and arbitrarily at the instance of the management . The illegal rejection order was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court and as per order of the Hon'ble Court the dispute has been referred to this Tribunal for adjudication . It has been stated that the demand ofthe concernedworkmen for regularisation/permanent status inappropriate grade is legal and justified. Ithas been prayed before this Hon'ble Tribunal to answer the reference in favour of the workmen by directing the management to regularise the concerned workmen on being reinstated with retrospective effect with all arrear ofwages.

25. Dinesh Kumar Bharatiya

26. Jai Nath Yadav

27. DharmendraRam

28. Gauree Shankar

29. Sri Uma Shandar

30. Mohinder Ram

3. Written statement has been filed on behalf ofthe management stating that the present reference is not legally maintainable. No employer and employee relationshipexists between the management and the concerned workman. Mewa Singh was given a contractjob forbrief period during rainy reason on account of some break-down of machineries for the purpose of transportation of parts of machineries andother materials from surface to underground and from underground to surface . The total working per year would be at best between 15 to 20 days. It has been stated that Mewa Singh was the contractor who was awarded the contract andhe engaged his own men for doing the job of contract. Thejob which was awarded to Mewa Singh was purelycasual and temporary in nature. The job entrusted to Sri Mewa Singh on the basis of work orders issued to him could be executed by engaging 7 to 9 workers only and at no point of time the strength of workmen would exceed ten in number. Mewa Singh approached the sponsoring union for induction into the services of the company some ofhis contract workers and some job seekers through litigation.Accordingly, the present purported dispute has been raised without any justification putely with some ulterior motive on some financial consideration only.Mewa Singh was never awarded any contract on any permanent nature ofjob and on perusal of the work it will reveal that thejob could hardly take one to two days per work order . The contractor workers has got no existing right to get regularisation in the services of the company as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court . The Hon'ble Ministry declinedto refer the industrial dispute vide letter dated 20-12-2000 mentioning the reason therein. Thereafter union filedwrit 2. Written statement has been filed on behalf of the workmen stating that S/ Shri Ashok Ram and 29 others concerned workmen had been working as permanent workmen at Alkusa Colliery since long with unblemished. record of service . The concerned workmen has been working inpermanent and perennial nature ofjob, such as, Tyndal , welder , broking etc. They were working in permanent nature ofjob continuously under the direct control and supervision of the management . They were rendering services and producing goods for the benefit of the management. All implements for execution forjob were being supplied by the management . The management has implementedWage Board Recommendation and National CoalWageAgreement . They were performing the job within the precinct and premises of the mine and job which they wereperforming are permanent nature as per Wage Board Recommendation and NCWA and accordingly all the concerned workmen were entitled to receive wages and other benefits as per NCWA. The management with an mala fide intention to deprive the concerned workmen of their legitimatewages and other benefit was not maintaining statutory records regarding the concerned workmen and management used to disburse their wages for below the 6100

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 (ii )] petitionbefore the Hon'ble High Court, Ranchi Bench , Ranchi and the Hon'ble Court directed the Ministry to refer the dispute for adjudication. Accordingly, the present reference.

In rejoinder, the management has stated that Ashok Ram and 29 others were never engaged by the management in anykind ofjob. It has been stated that Mewa Singh was awardedcontract for doing purely temporary and casual nature ofjob as per work order. The payments were made toMewa Singh as per bills . The demand of the union for regularisation of Ashok Ram and 29 others is neither legal norjustified.

Ithas been prayed to hold that the demand of Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Kustore Area for regularisation/permanent to Ashok Ram and 29 others is neither legal nor justified and, therefore , they are not entitled toany relief.

4. Rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the workmen stating therein almost the same facts as have been stated inthe written statement of the workmen.

5. The management has produced MW- 1 Ram Janam Singh, MW -2-Sukhdeo Yadav and MW-3 -L. M. P. Sinha, who has proved Ext . M- 1 series .

The concerned workmen have produced Ashok Ram, oneofthe concerned workmen , as WW- 1 , who has proved Ext. W-1 .

6. The main argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workmen is that they had been working with the management and they had taken from the concerned workmen by camouflaging to deny employment . The management has argued that Mewa Singh and others who are members of Janta Mazdoor Sangh written statement and it has been argued that Mewa Singh was given a contractjob forbriefperiod during rainy season on account of some break down of machineries for purpose of transportation of parts of machineries and other materials from surface to underground and from underground to surface and the job was purely casual and temporary in nature.

7. On behalf of the management a bunch of documents have been filed and marked Ext . M- 1 series which are noting sheets and bills for payment to the contractor, Mewa Singh which proves that Mewa Singh wasa contractor for brief period and was awarded contract for rainy season. It has been argued by the management that they are contract labourers and they cannot be regularised and the management referred W. P. (L) No. 1021 of2003 ofHon'ble Jharkhand High Court , Ranchi dated 30-4-2009 in which the Hon'ble Court set aside the order passed by the Tribunal for regularisation.

laid down--" Though industrial adjudicators' power to direct regularisation was not directly in issue in Umadevi (3), ifthe case is covered by the concept of regularisation, the same cannot be viewed differently only because it is before an industrial adjudicator Concept of regularisation is clearly linked withArt . 14. If the fact situation is covered by para 45 of Umadevi ( 3) the industrial adjudicator can modify relief, but that does not dilute the observations made by Supreme Court in Umadevi ( 3 ) about regularisation-Even though the present case pre-dated Umadevi ( 3 ) , there could not be a case for regularisation without there being an employer-employee relationship- respondent having been engaged on daily wages and not possessing the requisite qualifications, held , was not entitled to regularisation from any angle . " The management also referred (2007 ) 2 Supreme Court Cases (L & S) 441 (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Dan Bahadur Singh & Ors) in which Hon'ble Court held-"Daily -rated employee ofHis status and rights-Held, not equable with that of a government servant-Hence , his claim to permanency has tobe adjudged from a different angle-further held, in the absence of availability of a post, such an employee is not entitled to claim permanency or absorption as a regular employee-Government Servants Status and right of. " Management referred (2007 ) S.C.C. I (L & S) 270 ( Indian Drugs& Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Workmen, IndianDrugs &Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid-Public employment--- Instrumentalities of State (government company)-Creation ofposts , appointment in posts , regularisation, fixing of pay scales, continuation in service , promotions ,etc. Authorities competent to take decisions in respect of Proper basis for such decisions- Impermissibility of deciding on basis of sympathy or compassion-Held, all the said functions are executive or legislative and it is highly improper for Judges to step into this sphere, except in a rare and exceptional case-The court cannot create a post where none exists, nor issue directions to absorb or regularise temporary employees , nor continue them in service , nor pay them salaries of regular employees , as there are purely executive or legislative functions-Supreme Court cannot arrogate to itselfpowers ofthe executive or legislative Judicial activism in this connection , deprecated-furthermore , such questions cannot be decided in court on basis of emotions and sympathies , but must be decided on legal principles- clarified, that directions given by Supreme Court in certain cases for regularisation of temporary or ad hoc employees without laying down any principle of law, did not lay down any precedent and had to be treated as directions given under Art . 142-situation of scarcity ofjobs , and reasons therefor, posited observed, jobs cannot be created by judicial . orders , nor even by legislative or executive decisions-Jobs are created when the economy is rapidly expanding , which means when there is rapid industrialisation-Additional burden imposed on people at large to benefit a few. in case of state-created 8. The management has referred (2007) 2 Supreme CourtCases (L& S) 258 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court 6101 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

employees and they are denying verbally and the attendance register has been held up by the management . Ithas been stated that the concerned workmen submitted an affidavit that they have been working in permanent nature ofjob like, Tyndal since long under the direct control and supervision of the management.

10. It has been argued by the concerned workmen that non-possession of licence by the contractor U/s. 12 and non -possession of registration certificate by the management U/s . 9 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act , 1970, WW- 1-Ashok Ram-stated inpara 12ofhis evidence that Mewa Singh was neither possessing any licence nor the management was possessing any registration certificate. He was not cross -examined on that very point . It shows that the management has got no registration certificate and Mewa Singh no licence under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970. In thisrespect management's witness, MW- 1-Ram Janam Singh, stated in cross -examination-" I do not have any knowledge whether management procured registration certificate for engaging contractor. I have not seen the licence ofMewa Singh and we have not produced the same. " MW- 2- Sukhdeo Yadav, stated in cross- examination-" I have not seen the licence and registration certificate."

Ithas been argued that it is admitted position that thecontractor not possessing licence and the management notpossessing registration certificate. The workmen have referred 1993 Lab . I.C. 1323-( Secretary, Haryana State ElectricityBoard Vs. Suresh & Ors. )

employment, pointed out public sector-state owned/ operated corporations . Hon'ble court also held- "Regularisation can only be done in accordance with the rules and not dehors the rules-State Owned/Operated Corporations-Public Sector. " Management has also referred (2007 ) I Supreme Court Cases (L & S) 346- (Gangadhar Pillai Vs. Siemens Ltd. ) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court "Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Ss. 25- T & 2 ( ra) r/w Sch . V Part I Entry 10 and 2 (oo) (bb ) Employment ofbadlies , casual or temporary workmen and continuation for years in these categories-When amounts to unfair labour practice-Entirety of circumstances brought on record by the parties Breaks in service if artificial when occasioned by the nature of the work- Object of giving temporary employment-C iffalls under Sec. 2 ( oo) (bb )-Held, only because an employee has been engaged as a casual or temporary employee intermittently for a number of years , the same by itself would not imply that unfair labour practices have been resortedto-Determination of the question as to whether anunfair labour practice has been resorted to is essentlally aquestion of fact-In present case, though there had been breaks in service , the same were not artificial ones- requirement to employ employees on a temporary basis is writ large on the face of the nature of projects undertaken by respondent company- period of employment of appellant has all along been commensurate with the period ofwork undertaken by respondent under the respective project contracts-Further , appellant was actually employed by each site office or respondent, which is a separate establishment-Lastly,, appointment was given onterms thatbring the case squarely within the terms of s . 2 (oo) (bb) , wherein the term of the contract was fixed on basis of nature of job- In such circumstances , object of temporary employment was bonafide and not to deprive theappellant employee from benefit ofa permanent status- Maharashtra Recognition ofTrade Unions and Prevention ofUnfair Labour Practice . "

11. Another argument advanced on behalf of the workmen that after the judgement of Uma Devi reported in 2006 Lab. I.C. 865, the workman can claim regularisation in the service of the company. In this respect the workmen referred 2008 AIR SCW page 3996-G. M. , O. N. G. C. , Shilchar Vs. O. N. G. C. Contractual-Workers Union in which Hon'ble Supreme Court held - " Regularisation of service Contractual Workers-Disentitlement from claiming regularisation -Not inflexible rule- Workers appointed by ONGC initially through contractor-claim for regularisation-Reference to Tribunal-Finding of fact byTribunal that workmen were employees of ONGC and not contract employees-Being employees of ONGC workmen would be entitled to all benefits available in that capacity, and issue of regularisation would pale into insignificance . " Hon'ble Court also held-" Pleadings of parties and evidence produced Relevant for determining real scope ofdispute-Wording of reference showing that dispute was as to regularisation of service of contractual workers Pleadings however showing that core isssue before Tribunal was with regard to status of workers as employees of principal employer Award of Tribunal holding workers to be employees of principal employer and granting relief of regularisation-Not outside 10 9. The learned counsel of the workmen argued that this case was referred to this Tribunal as per order of the Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi dated 8-6-2003 passed in W.P. (L) No. 6195 of 2002. It has been argued that the concerned workmen were the employees of the management and the management to camouflage the real issuedeny them regularisation/permanency and terminated their service from January, 1995 due to their constant demand for regularisation. The management deny the relationship between the concerned workmen and the management also treat that the concerned workmen were engaged by the contractor . The concerned workmen had called for attendance register by a petition dated 29-7-05 and the workmen also called for statutory attendance register for the years 1992 to 1994. The management neither produced the called for documents nor has given any explanation. It shows that the concerned workmen are their 6102

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18, 1931

B. RELATIONSHIP OF EMPLOYER AND jurisdiction. " The learned counsel of the workmen referred anotherjudgement of Hon'ble Court reported in 2007 AIR SCW page 6904-(U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Poonam Chandra Pandey & Ors. ) in which Uma Devi's case has beenconsidered in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court held- "Regularisation of service-Petitioners were daily wage employees of Co-operative Electric Supply Society- Societywas taken over by Electricity Board-Pursuant to proceeding by Minister of Co -operative , petitioners ' services were taken over by Board ' in the name manner and position' Earlier, Electricity Board had taken decision to regularise services of its daily wage employees who wereworking from before 4-5-1990-since petitioners ' were appointed in society before 4-5-1990, they cannot be denied benefit of decision of Board permitting regularisation- Moreover, when they had put in about 22 years of service . "

EMPLOYEE- The decisive factor for determination of- Control and suspervision by the principal employer- Absorption of workers working in statutory canteen through contractor-When the Management is employing more than 250 workers-Factories Act, 1948-Section 2 ( I ), 'Worker'-Management engaging contractor for running the canteen since 1971-Contractors were changing from time to time-Last two contractors running the canteen since more than 14 years each but the employees remained the same-The Appellant-Management was providing premises, furniture, fuel , gas, electricity, water and laid down several procedures as to how food items to be supplied- Industrial Court has rightly held that the wages and the provident fund contributions were reimbursed by the Appellant-Management and the evidence revealed that the contract has been nothing but only a paper arrangement. The material as placed showed that though the canteenwas run by the contractor but ultimate control and supervision has been by the Company-Directions issued to implement the decision dated 15-10-1998 within a period ofthree months.

The workmen also referred 2009 ( 120) FLR 143- (Kanpur StateElectricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. Samin Mirza) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court held-" Service- Termination-Validity-Contention of appellant that there was no employer employee relationship between the appellant and the respondents-On basis of documents submitted by the workmen and for lack of proper rebuttal to such documents there was no ground to presume that workmenwere employees of the contractor-In fact they were inregular employment of appellant as cashiers having worked more than 240 days-Tribunal rightly concluded that termination of service of respondents without notice and payment of compensation was illegal . " They also referred 2008 LLR 509 (SC)-(Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Association of Engineering Workers ) in which Hon'ble Supreme Court held--

C. MAHARASHTRA RECOGNITION OF TRADE UNIONS AND PREVENTION OF UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES ACT, 1971-Section 28-item 9 of Sch. IV- ULP Complaint-Respondent Union filed a complaint of unfair labour practice on behalf of 27 canteen workers , against company claiming the said canteen workers tobe employees of the company-sought that the canteen workers be given all the benefits as provided to other employees of the Company and to stop the said unfair labourpractice-Industrial Court held it to be unfair labour practice committed by Management-Writ petition by Management dismissed- Writ Appeal also dismissed Appeal in the Apex Court- The Apex Court upheld the decision of the Industrial Court which was confirmed by . the High Court for the reasons ( i ) canteen employees continued despite change of canteen contractors; ( ii ) evidence on record established the ultimate control of Management on the canteen employees ; ( iii ) Industrial Court rightlydecided, in view of evidence coupled with terms of agreement that canteen contract was only paper agreement ; and rightly held that company has committed unfair labourpractice ; (iv) No error or infirmity in those conclusions ofthe Industrial Court which was affirmedby High Court.

" A. CANTEEN WORKERS THROUGH CONTRACTOR-Absorption of By the principal employer-When the canteen is required to be run under Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948- There were 27 canteen workers working for many years through the contractors who were changing but the workers remained the same-Complaint for unfair labour practice on behalf ofcanteen workers accepted by the Industrial Court-High Court confirmed the order since the canteen has been a part of establishment of the management and the workers incanteenwere carrying on the work which was ofperennial nature-Canteen has been incidental to and connected with the work of establishment of the Management- Though treating the workers as contract employees contrary to the statutory obligation and the judicial pronouncement of the Apex Court-Management filing appeal before the Supreme Court-Relying upon the judgement of3 Judges bench in Petrochemical Corporation Limited & Ors with identical facts held that the fact is that the canteen in establishment of the Appellant- Management is a statutory canteen- The respondents- workmen are in fact workmen of the Appellant- Management.

D. CONTRACT LABOUR ( REGULATION & ABOLITION) , ACT, 1970 VIS- A- VIS MAHARASHTRA RECOGNITION OF TRADE UNIONS AND PREVENTION OF UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES ACT, 1971-Workers working through canteen contractor seeking absorption by the principal employer to be entitled to the same benefits-Plea of the principal employer that instead of complaint underthe latter Act, the appropriate remedy for seeking redressal of grievances is under the former Act, 6103 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

Supreme Court reported in-( i ) SCLJ ( 15) page 112- Hussainbhai Vs. Alath Factory, ( ii) 1964 ( II) LLJ page633- D. C. DiwanMohiuddin Saheb .Vs. United Salt Workers, (iii)2003 FLR5 Mishra Dhatu Nigam Vs. M. Venkataiah & others, (iv) 2000 (87) FLR page 7-G. B. Pant University, (v) 2002 (93 ) FLR page 290- Indian Fermer Fertilizer CorporationVs. Industrial Tribunal , (vi) 2003 (98) FLR page 826-Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. State ofU.P. *whereby it is to be resolved by the machinery as provided und the Industrial Disputes Act-Untenable . "The workmenhave referred ajudgement of Division Bench of CalcuttaHigh Court passed order of regularisation after considering the Uma Devi's case , reported in 2008 (118) FLR 1176 (M/ s . Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. CentralGovt. Industrial Tribunal ) and the same view has also been approved by Jharkhand High Court reported in 2008 (3 ) JLJR 109. The workman also field a copy of the Award dated3-10-96 passed by Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , Dhanbad in Reference No. 58 of 1992 by directing the management of Swang Washery of M/s . C. C. Ltd. to regularise the contractor workmen, which has been confirmed by Single Bench and Division Bench of the Hon'bleHigh Court in CWJC No. 199/97 (R) dated 9-4-99 and L. P. A. No. 214/99 (R) dated 19-8-99 and the said judgementhas been confirmedby the ConstitutionBench oftheHon'ble Supreme Court reported in LLR 2001 page 961 between Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. National UnionWater Front Workers at page 996 in paragraph 128 . Theworkmen also referred for regularisation of workmen which isreported in SCLJ (6) page 3867-Basti Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ram Ujagar. The learned counsel of the workmen argued that in Uma Devi's case employer-employee relationship was not in dispute. It was the case of the Government that Uma Devi and others were casual employees of theGovernment and their appointment were illegal as Article 309 of the Constitution was not followed inappointing them. The Hon'ble Apex Court held that casual workmen who were illegally appointed were notto beregularisedbut irregular appointee should be regularised. Inthe present case the employer-employee relationship isindispute and the Tribunal is to determine employer- employee relationship. "

14. It shows that as per evidence of the management. theconcernedworkmen are performing duties ofpermanent nature and without holding licence by Mewa Singh and without registration of the management for giving contract ofsuch permanent nature of work, which shows that the management is camouflaging the real issue but they are taking work from the concerned workmen. Ext . W-1 shows the attendance of the concerned workman, though the concerned workman have demanded attendance register from theyears 1992to 1994 , but the management has not filed it reasonsbest known to the management . Theyhave not filed any registration certificate under Sec. 9A of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 and under Sec. 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970. The said contract letter has not been filedby the management regarding giving contract to Mewa Singh. As evidence produced by the management shows that, as per evidence of MW- 1 in cross-examination at page 3, the duties of tyndal is to carry machinaries from underground to surface and vice versa. The job of tyndal is permanent nature . The nature ofjob of welder and tyndal are given in Wage board Recommendation. Contract is givento the person who is in possession of licence under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act. I do not have any knowledge whether management procure registration certificate for engaging contractor . I have not seenthe licence ofMewa Singh and we have not produced the same . I have not seen the attendance registers from 1992to 1994. The attendance register will show how many days they have worked. Form 'B ' is maintained for company's employees . I have no knowledge whether their names appear in Form 'B' Register. The undergroundwork canbe supervised only by the competent person. Whoever works in the underground works under the supervision of thecompetent person . The management provide cap lamp for going to the underground. They were rendering service forthebenefit of the management.

12. Another argument advanced by the learned counsel ofthe workmen that the management's witness, MW- 1 admitted in cross -examination that thejob of tyndal ispermanent nature . The nature ofjob of welder and tyndal aregiven in Wage Board Recommendation . Under Sec.48 ofthe Mines Act, attendance register is maintained in the colliery.He has not seen the attendance register of 1992 to 1994. He has no knowledge whether their names appear in the form ' B' Register. They were rendering services for thebenefit ofthe management. MW- 2 has admitted in cross- examination that " I have no knowledge about the working of concerned workmen. Without the permission of the MinesManager nobody is allowed to work in underground. I have not seen any tender paper submitted by Mewa Singh forexecution ofjob. Contract is allotted through tender by BCCL. I have not seen any paper regarding engagement of Mewa Singh as contractor. I cannot say about demand. "

MW-2stated in cross-examination at page 2 that- "I have no knowledge about the working of the concerned workmen. I have not seen the licence and registration certificate .Overman and Sirdar look after the work in the underground mine . Without the permission of the Mines Manager nobody is allowed to work underground mines. The employees ofBCCL get wages as per NCWA. I have not seen any tender papers submitted by Mewa Singh for execution of job . MW- 3-L.M.P. Sinha , in cross- examination stated that " I have not seen the order of 13. It has been argued on behalf workmen that the entireattempt ofthe management to deprive the workmen and the same is ruse and camouflage and the workmen are entitled for regularisation in view of the decisions ofHon'ble

3540G1/2009-15 6104

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

Present : N.K. Purohit, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 105/2000

Ref. No. L- 12812/202 /98 - IR (B - I) dated 15-03-1999 BETWEEN

Shri R.K. Malviya,

Sector-G,LIG-75, Jankipuram Sitapur Road,

Applicant

Lucknow (U.P. ) - 226001

AND

TheChairman,

BharatOverseas Bank Ltd. ,

Respondent

Habib Tower, Chennai -600001

reference. I knowthe name of only Ashok Kumar and not the names of others . I have not seen the originals of Ext. M- 1 series . I cannot say if the originals of Ext . M- 1 series are available in the area office or not . Ext. M - 1 series were not attested before me . The evidence of the management shows that the management has got no licence under Sec . 9 and Mewa Singh has got no licence under Sec. 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970. The concerned workmen had been working in permanent and perennial nature ofjob under direct control And supervision of the management, but the management todeprive them from the benefit of regularisation treating them as contractor's workmen. So , the management has not filed attendance register for the years 1992 to December, 1994 though it was demanded by the concerned workmen to'producebefore the Tribunal. The management has not filed contract paper awarded to Mewa Singh . The work which is permanent in nature cannot be given to contractor.

AWARD

Passed on 5-5-2009

15. In view of the discussions made above , I come to the conclusion that the demand of Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the management of Kustore Area for regularisation/ permanent toAshok Ram and 29 others , named in the order of reference, is legal and justified. Accordingly, the concerned workmen are entitled for regularisation w.e.f. 1-1-1995 with 50% back wages . The regularisation be done onlyafter identification by the representative ofthe union. Themanagement is directed to implement the award within 60days from the date of publication ofthe award.

1. By order No. L- 12812/202/98 - IR(B- I ) dated : 15-03-1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referredthis industrial dispute between Sh . R.K. Malviya, SectorG, LIG- 75, Jankipuram Sitapur Road, Lucknow and the Chairman, Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. , Habib Tower, Chennai for adjudication.

This is my award.

2. The reference under adjudication is:

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 9 सितम्बर, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. was justified in discharging the services of Sh . R.K. Malviya Clerk- cum-Cashier w.e.f. 19-6-1995 . If not to what relief is workman is entitled to?"

का. आ. 2791.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत ओवरसिज बैंक लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 105/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 9-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/202/98- आई आर ( बी- I ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 9th September, 2009

S.O. 2791.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. and their workman, received by the CentralGovernment on 9-9-2009 .

3. This factual position is almost undisputed that at the time of alleged misconduct by the workman, he was posted at branch office of the Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. asClerk-cum-Cashier. He was placed under suspension bythe Chairman ofthe bank vide order dt. 11-2-94 for alleged misconduct and thereafter a charge sheet dt. 5-8-94 was issued against him and departmental enquiry was initiated against him . The enquiry officer after ex -party enquiry found all charges in the said charge sheet as proved and the disciplinary authority after being issuing a show cause notice dt . 13-4-95 and after providing opportunity of personal hearing, finally imposed punishment of discharge from the services of the bank vide impugned order dt. 19-6-95. An appeal was preferred by the workman against the above order but the same was rejected which led the petitioner to raise this industrial dispute before the concerned authority. Failure of conciliation proceeding necessitated the appropriate Government to refer the matter for adjudication before this Tribunal . This is also not disputed that said Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. has been amalgamated in the Indian Overseas Bank on 12-3-2007.

[No. L- 12012/202/98- IR (B- I) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer 6105 [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

threatened him with dire consequences in case of reporting matter to thehead office and thereafter he left the premises. It isfurther stated that at about 4.00 P.M. on the same day the workman came to the branch and handed over a letter to theManager confirming the above incident expressing regret for his misconduct for the said misbehavior. However , around 6.00 P.M. he came back to the Manager's cabin and took away his letter forcibly which was lying on the Manager'stable.

7. In written statement the allegations of the workman regarding unfair enquiry and violation of principle ofnaturaljustice in conducting enquiry have been denied and it is alleged that averments made in the statement of claim are false and frivolous therefore , claim be rejected.

8. On the basis of the averments made in statement ofclaim andwritten statement following preliminary issues wereframed on 10-1-2001 :

1. Whether the domestic enquiry is fair and proper ?

2. Whether the domestic enquiry suffers with vice ofperversity.

4. As per version of the workman in the averments made in the statement ofclaim , on 5-2-94 about 9.15΄Α.Μ. the workman reached at branch office Indra Nagar, Lucknow to seek help from Sh. A.K. Chaturvedi , Clerk (Union Leader) in the matter of registration of his house and by that time he had not reached the said office . Sh . Mohd . Bashir sub staff of the said branch office told him that he may help him in the said matter. Thereafter, Sh. Mohd. Bashir went inside the Cabin of the Manager of the branch office and when he came back told the workman that he may not help him in the matter as he would be going to Hazratganj Branch, meantime , Sh . Chaturvedi enteredthe branch and assured the workman to help in the said matter thereafter workman left the premises about 9.30 A.M. , but as soon as , he was out of the main gate of the said branch, he heard a noise ofbreaking up window- panes of Manager's cabin and as a result of the said unexpected event , he could not move ahead and thereafter as soon, he started moving forward, he saw Sh. A. C. Bithal coming out of the branch , crying under the wrong perception as if the said act of breaking up of the window- panesbeingdone by the workman when he protested and objected and requested him not to shout at him and upon , Sh.Bithal started using unparliamentary language against him.At about 9.40 A.M. , the workman left the said place of incident ignoring Sh . Bithal , who was still furious against him with some abusive remarks .

9. The then learned Presiding Officer of the Tribunal vide its order dt. 4-4-2001 found the enquiry unfair and defective and decide the aforesaid issues in favour of the workman and opportunity was given to the opposite party to prove the alleged charges againt the workman before the Tribunal .

10. The management has examined Sh . S.K. Gaur the then Accountant and Sh . T.K. Shridhar the then TraineeOfficer in the branch to prove the charges leveled against the workman whereas in rebuttal , the workman has examined himself as witness .

11. The management has also filed following documents in support of its case:

5. The workman has questioned the fairness of the domestic enquiry on several grounds including holding ex-party enquiry against him without giving opportunity for defence and findings are not based on the evidence, which havebeen mention in para 5 to 61 ofthe statement of claim and prayed that alleged charge sheet dt . 5-8-94 be declared as bad in law and impugned punishment order dt . 19-6-95 be set aside and direction be given to the opposite party to pay him arrears of full wages from the date of his suspension order.

1. Copy of record reports (C-53)

2. Copy ofcash memo of snaps dt. 5-2-94 (C-53/2)

3. Photographs (Two) ( C-53/3 & C-53/4)

12. Heard the arguments advanced by both the sides and perused the written arguments submitted by the workmanand scanned the oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the sides .

13. The workman has contended that the management has not examined the main witness Sh. A. C. Bithal on whose report departmental enquiry was initiated and who is said to be victim of alleged misconduct . The management has not proved the copies of record register dt. 5-2-94ofbranch office of Indra Nagar C-53 . Letterdt . 7-2-94 of Sh.A.C. Bithal , addressed to the Regional Manager& alleged confession letter dt. 5-2-94 said to have been given by the workman and they could not be relied on against the workman. In support of his contention he 6. As per management version in their written statement, the workman came to Indra Nagar branch on 5-2-94 at around 9.30 A.M. Sh . Mohd . Bashir Sub - staff sought Manager's permission to go out of the branch to dosomepersonal work of the workman . The then Manager Sh. A.C. Bithal refusal to grant permission when the said Sh. Mohd. Bashir reported to the workman about the Managerrefused to grant permission, the workmanbecame wild and started shouting in the bank's hall in the presence of customers and staff members . On seeing this , the Manager came out of his cabin and requested him not to create any problem in the branch and instructed him to leave the branch premises. The workman went out of the branch and threw a stone at the Manager's cabin and damaged with window-panes of the cabin. It is further alleged that when Manager Sh . Bithal came out of the branch, the workman shouted and abused him in unparliamentary and obscene language and he also 6106

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

3. (2006)2 SCC 584 South Bengal State Transport Corpn. Vs. Sapan Kumar Mitra & Others.

has place reliance on M/s . Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. AIR 1972 SC 330, 339 and CM Deshmukh Vs. Board ofTrustee,PortofBombay, 1995 Lab . I.C. page 1496(Bom. HC).

4. ( 1977 ) 2 SCC 491 State of Haryana & Another Vs.Rattan Singh.

5. 2005 SCC (L& S) 407 Divisional Controller, KSRTC ( NWKRTC) vs. A.T. Mane.

6. 2005 SCC (L&S) 412Muriadih Colliery ofBharat Cooking Coal Ltd. vs. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union.

14. The workman has also contended that out of listed 9 witnesses , the management has produced only 2 witnesses, and both of them have admitted in cross- examination that they did not go out -side the branch therefore, they have not seen the alleged incident of misconduct said to be occurred outside the branch . Whatever they have deposed is totally based on information given by Sh. A.C. Bithal, therefore , in absence ofrequired testimony ofSh. A. C. Bithal, hearsay evidence ofboth the witnesses can not be relied. In this matter Sh . A.C. Bithal and Sh . Mohd. Bashir were the material witness as per alleged incident to whom the management unfairly and without assigning any reason withhold . Had the management been fair enough, introducing material witnesses, it could have been well established on their cross-examination that they do not support the charges or charge couldbe falsified by their evidence obtain on their cross examination. Denying the said opportunity to the workman is violation of principle of natural justice and adverse inference should be drawn for withholding material witnesses, against the management . In support of his contentionhehas relied on Broja Ballav Ghose V. Union of India, 1986 Lab. I.C. 1166 & Ganesh Rajan V. M/s . Bennet Coleman &Co. Ltd. , 1989 Lab . I.C. 534.

17. Before embarking upon the merit ofthe case on thebasis of evidence of both the sides , it would be proper togo through the case laws cited relating to appreciation of the evidence & applicability of the rules of Evidence Act in thematter ofenquiries . In AIR 1972 SC330 Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that though Evidence Act is not applicable to the industrial tribunals that does not mean thatwhere issues are seriously contested and have to be established and proved, the requirements relating to proof canbedispensed with. In 1995.LAB . I.C. 1496 Hon ble Bom . H. C. has observed that hearsay or indirect evidence can not take the place of conclusive evidence in the absence of any other substantive evidence . In regard to the charge against the petitioner, the proof of truthfulness of the hearsay evidence cannot be dispensed with in a domestic enquiry . The basic rule governing domestic enquiry requires that no order entailing penal consequence can be made on the basis of ex-parte statements of witnesses or hearsay evidence . In 2006 (2) SCC 584 cited bythe learned representative of the management Hon'ble ApexCourt has observed that strict proof oflegal evidence and findings thereon, not necessary. In 1977 ( 2 ) SCC 491 Hon'bleApex Court has held that in a domestic enquiry all the strict and sophisticated rules of the Evidence Act may not apply. All materials which are logically probative for a prudent man are permissible , though departmental authorities and Administrative Tribunals must be careful in evaluating such material and should not be glibly swallow whatisstrictly speaking not relevant under the Evidence Act. The essence of judicial approach is objectivity, exclusion of extraneous materials or considerations, and observance of rules of natural justice.

15. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf ofthe opposite party has urged that charges leveled against the workman are well proved by evidence of witnesses Sh. S.K. Gaur and Sh . T.K. Shridhar which also find corroborationfrom documentary evidence , copy ofregister C-53 and photographs showing the broken window panes. Moreover, the workman was posted in other branch and he has admitted that at the time of incident he went to Indra Nagar branch for his own purpose. He has further argued that workman has admitted in his evidence that he had enmity with Sh. A.C. Bithal . The version of the workman that Sh. A.C. Bithal started shouting, is not believable. If incidentdid not take place and the workman did nothing then there was no reason to shout and abuse the workman. Hehas also argued that from the evidence of the workman albo it appears that some incident took place on the date and time alleged in the charges . He has further argued that the then Manager Sh. Bithal is retired therefore, has not beenexamined. He has furthermore argued that strict rule ofevidence are not applicable in the matter of enquiries .

16. In support of his argument reliance has been placed on following case laws;

18. Inviewof above legal position it is not disputed that in domestic enquiry strict rules of Evidence Act are not applicable and strict proof of legal evidence is not required but at the same time it does not mean where issues are seriously contested and have to be established and proved, the requirements relating to proof can be dispensed with . The evidence on record is to be evaluated in the light of above legal position.

1. (2006)2 SCC 255 TNCS Corpn. Ltd. & Others vs. K.Meerabai .

2. (2006 ) 2 SCC 269 LK Verma vs HMT Ltd. and another.

19. It is pertinent to mention that since the preliminary issues framed in this matter have been decided infavour of the workman and enquiry conducted against theworkman has been held as unfair and not proper, there 6107 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

22. Now, it is to be seen whether from the oral & documentary evidence adduced by the management, the charges leveled against the workman stand proved.

is no need to go into the merit of the various grounds taken inthe statement ofclaim in this regard. It is also pertinent to mention that evidence recorded during the domestic enquiryand evidence adduced byboth the parties in regard to preliminary issues is not to be considered to prove the charges ofalleged misconduct against the workman in the light of following principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court inNeeta Kaplish Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and another 1999 SCC (L&S) 302.

"Inallcaseswhere enquiry has not been held or the enquiry has been found to be defective labour court/ tribunal can call upon the management or the employertojustify action taken against the workman andto show by fresh evidence that the termination ordismissal order was proper. Ifmanagement does not lead any evidence by availing of this opportunity, it cannot raise any grouse any subsequent stage that it should have been given that opportunity, as the Tribunal, in those circumstances, would be justified in passing an award in favour of-the workman. Ifhowever, opportunity is availed of and evidence is adduced by the management, validity of action taken by it has to be scrutinized and adjudicated on the basis of such fresh evidence . "

23. The management witness Sh. S.K. Gaur and Sh. T.K. Shridhar have stated in their statement on oath that on5-2-94 they were present at the time ofalleged incident inthe Indra Nagar branch of the bank. Both the witnesses have stated in their affidavit that at about 9.15 A.M. Workman Sh. R.K. Malviya came to Indra Nagar branch and started talking with Sh. Mohd. Bashir who had entered in the cabin of the Branch Manager for permission to leave branch on account of some personal work of the workman. The then Manager Sh. Bithal refused permission for leaving the branch to Sh. Mohd. Bashir. The workman on coming to know about refusal started shouting and abusing theManager Sh. Bithal where upon he came out ofhiscabinand ask the workman to refrain from creating nuisance in the bank hall . Thereafter, the workman went out of the branch and threw a big stone on the window panes ofthe cabin of the Manager and on being asked by theManager, the workman started abusing him . They have also stated that thereafter Branch Manager was also threatened that if matter is reported to the Head Office, the workmanwill take out his eyes . Subsequent to this incident Branch Manager Sh. Bithal recorded the incident in the record registerwhich has been signed by both of them and others such as Sh . A.K. Srivastava, Sh . P.K. Sharma , Sh. B.P. Misra and Sh . Ajay Yadav.

20. In the light of the above legal proposition the management was to adduce fresh evidence to prove the alleged misconduct against the workman. Now it is tobe considered as to whether on the basis of material on record under Section 11A of the I.D. Act as envisaged in the said case law, the management has succeeded to prove the charges leveledagainst the workman.

21. Indisputably, the workman was charge sheeted on 5-8-94 on the following charges:

ChargeNo. 1: You have damaged the windowpanes ofthe Manager's cabin by throwing a stone, which isagross misconduct as per para No. 19.5(C) ofthe Bipartite Settlement dt. 19-10-1966.

Charge No. 2: Your action of shouting and abusing

the Manager in unparliamentary and obscene language and threatening him with dire consequences is an act of riotous , disorderly and indecent , behaviour, which is a gross misconduct as per para No. 19.5 (C) ofthe Bipartite Settlement dt. 19-10-1966.

24. In rebuttal, the workman has stated that his posting was at Hazratganj main branch. He has admitted that on 5-2-94 he went to Indra Nagar branch at 9.15 Α.Μ. to meet Sh . A.K. Chaturvedi , Union Leader regarding registry of his house but he was not there . In his examination - in -chief the workman has reiterated his averments made in the statement ofclaim regarding alleged insident. He has denied all the alleged charges against him. He has also denied the allegations that he gave any lettertotheManager, which was later on forcibly snatched by him. In cross examination, he has stated that since his posting at Gorakhpur, Sh. A.C. Bithal has enmity with him butadmitted that said fact is not mentioned in his reply to the charge sheet . He has also denied this fact that Sh . Mohd. Bashir sought permission from the Manager regarding his work. He has also stated that as per his knowledge Sh . Bithal has left the services of Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. He has denied his signature on the photo copyofalleged letter dt . 5-2-94 written to theManager ofthe Branch for regret (document No. 6/2).

25. Charge No. 1

Incharge No. 1 it was to be provedby the management that the workman had damaged the window panes of the Manager's cabin by throwing a stone. To prove the said charge, the management has examined witnesses Sh. S.K. Gaur & Sh . T.K. Shridhar and in support oftheir Charge No. 3: By your action of shouting, using abusive/obscene language against the Manager Sh . A.C. Bithal and behaving in a riotous, disorderly and indecent behaviour, in front of customer, revenue auditors and staff members , you have tarnished the image and reputation of the bank and thereby you have acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the Bank which is a gross misconduct as per para No. 19.5 (j) ofthe Bipartite Settlement dt. 19-10-1966.

6108

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18, 1931

oral evidence produced a photo copy of the Bill of snaps (C-53/2 ) & two photographs ( C -53/3 & C- 53/4 ) . As per management version when the Manager Sh . Bithal came out ofhis cabin and requested the workman not to create anyproblem in the branch and instructed him to leave the banks premises , the workman went out of the branch & threw a stone at Manager's cabin and damaged the window panes of the cabin. Thus it is admitted case of the management that incident of alleged stone throwing took place outside the branch . The witnesses Sh. S.K. Gaur & Sh. T.K. Shridhar have been produced as eye witnesses of the said incident but both of them have stated in their cross examination that only manager Sh. Bithal went outside thebranch . Sh. S.K. Gaur has stated that he came to know about the said incident from Sh . Bithal , Manager . Similarly Sh. T.K. Shridhar has also stated that he himself did not go outside the branch at the time of incident. It is evident from their above statements in cross examination that their evidence is only hearsay & they did not see the workman throwing stone on Manager's cabin.

26. As regard photocopy of bill of the snaps and two photographs is concerned , they have not been proved by examining the photographer. Even, if window panes of the cabin of the Manager were found broken up as shown in the said photograph , in absence of any direct evidence , no inference can be drawn that window panes were broken bytheworkman.

269 besides admission of abusing an officer in filthy language for the delinquent employee, witnesses were examined for proving charges and on facts of the case Hon'ble Apex court has observed that things admitted not to be proved. But in instant case , the workman has not admitted the alleged misconduct. The alleged regret letter said to be given by the workman is not on the record and as per version of the management after submitting the alleged regret letter subsequently the same was forcibly taken awayby the workman from Branch Manager Sh. Bithal . But as stated earlier Sh. Bithal has not examined by the management . The other witnesses have not stated anything about such letter of regret . The workman has denied his signature during the cross examination on the document no .6/2 said to be the copy of the alleged letter of regret . This legal position is not disputed that fact admitted are not required to be proved but in present case the management has fail to establish that the workman ever admitted alleged misconduct . In (2005)2 SCC (L& S ) 407 the Bus Conductor to be in possession of sum over and above amount equivalent to tickets issued by him and in excess ofsum that bus conductor were permitted to carry besides this there was other material to establish misconduct therefore , in such circumstances Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that doctrine of Res ipsa loquitr ( that the facts speak for themselves) is applicable on the facts ofthe case but ininstant case facts are different . Merely, on the basis ofpresence ofthe workman in the branch on the date and time of alleged incident and photographs showing broken window - panes , it can not be said that facts speak themselves that window panes were broken by the workman . Therefore , contentions of the learned representative on behalf of the management are devoid of any force and not tenable.

30. Hence , in view of above discussions, it is difficult to conclude that the management proved the charge of misconduct alleged in charge no . 1 .

27. The workman has categorically denied the alleged charge No. 1. In view of his defence , it was imperative on the part of the management to have examine the Manager Sh . Bithal . He would have been the best person to depose as to who actually damaged the window panes of his cabin . It has not been explained why Sh . Bithal evidence was with held. There is no reason why an adverse inference should not be drawn against the management that had the management examined Sh. Bithal , Manager, before the Tribunal his evidence would have perhaps not established thatwindow panes was actually damaged by the workman.

ChargeNo. 2

31. In charge no. 2 the charge against the workman is that he shouted and abused to the branch manager Sh. Bithal in unparliamentary and obscene language and threaten him of dire consequences . In this regard the management has examined Sh . Gaur & Sh. Shridhar witnesses and produced photo copy of the record register (C-53).

28. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that from circumstantial evidence and admitted facts by the workman , it is evident that alleged incident has occurred. It is admitted case of the workman that his posting was at Hazratganj branch, Lucknow and on the date and time of alleged incident , he was present in the Indra Nagar, branch and he went there for his personal work. Photographs produced by the management side show that window panes of the cabin of the Branch Manager were found broken . Above circumstantial evidence corroborates the management's version for alleged misconduct . Moreover, the workman himselfhas regretted in writing for the alleged misconduct. In this regard he has place reliance on (2006) 2 SCC 269 & (2005)2(L& S) SCC407.

29. I have given my thoughtful consideration on the above contention and cited case laws. In (2006) 2 SCC

32. Sh. Gaur & Sh. Shridhar have been produced as eye witnesses of the incident and they have also signed the record of register (C-53 ) wherein the alleged incident of misconduct was subsequently said to be recorded by the Branch Manager Sh. Bithal on the same day i.e. 5-2-94. Both the above witnesses have deposed in their affidavit that the filthy abuses mentioned in their affidavit were given by the workman but during cross examination when confronted with the Copy of the record of register (C -53 ) 6109 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

they have admitted that said filthy abuses have not been mentioned in the above register. Sh . S.K. Gaur has stated that mentioning of said abuses might have been omitted in haste.

or the charge is falsiffed by the evidence obtained in cross examinationfrom those witnesses . In 2000 SCC (L& S) 85 a police constable charged of having abused his colleague while he was under the influence of liquor. However, neither complainant nor the other employee who accompanied the applicant tohospital for medical examination were examined. In such circumstances Hon'ble Apex Court has observed asunder:-

33. It is admitted case of the management in charge sheet itself that said incident of alleged filthy abuses & threatening of dire consequences occurred outside the branch whereas contrary to above version of the management, Sh. S.K. Gaur witness has stated in his cross examination that alleged threat for direct consequences was given by the workman in the hall situated inside the branch. He has also stated that he did not go outside the branch at the time of alleged misconduct therefore, his testimony is not credible. Second witness Sh. T.K. Shridhar thethen trainee officer in the branch, has also admitted in hiscross examination that he has not witness the incident which tookplace outside the branch. Thus in the evidence ofmanagement witnesses and facts mentioned in the charge sheet there is inconsistencies and material contradictions onthe points of place of alleged incident.

"the sole ground urged is as to the non -observance oftheprinciples of natural justice in not examining the complainant, Sh . Virender Singh and witness JagdishRam. The Tribunal as well as the High Court have brushed aside the grievance made by the appellant that the non -examination of those two persons has prejudiced his case . Examination of these two witnesses would have revealed as to whether the complaint made by Virender Singh was correct or not and to establish that he was the best person to speakto its veracity. So also Jagdish Ram who accompanied the appellant to the hospital for medical examination , would have been an important witness to prove the state or the condition of the appellant . We do not think the Tribunal and the High Court were justified in thinking that non- examination of these two persons could not be material . In these circumstances , were of the view that the High Court and the Tribunal erred in not attaching importance to this contention of the appellant. "

In the light of the above observations withholding material witness Sh . A. C. Bithal, Branch Manager is fatal for the management and it has caused prejudice to the workman and adverse inference could be drawn against the management for withholding material witness who was complainant and said to be the victim of alleged misconduct.

ChargeNo. 3

35. In view of the aforesaid discussions , the management has also failed to prove charge no. 2 against the workman. As regards charge no . 3 the allegation of misconduct in charge no . 3 and charge no . 2 are similar except that in charge no. 3. It is also mentioned that since incident alleged in charge no. 2 occurred infront of the customers, auditors and staff members , the workman has tarnished the image of the bank . Since the charge no . 2 is not proved, therefore , on the basis of the findings of charge no. 2, charge no . 3 also stands not proved.

36. Since the management has failed to prove all the 3 charges leveled against the workman for his alleged misconduct , resultantly, the workman deserves to be exonerated from all the charges and action of the management discharging the workman from his service w.e.f. 19-5-95 can not said to be justified. Thus, the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service .

34. The management has produced a photo copy of registerofrecord ( C- 53 ) . The original register of record (C- 53) has not been produced. The workman has denied the alleged misconduct . He has also denied that any letter of regret was ever given by him to the said branch manager. There is no oral evidence on this point that any letter of regret was given by the workman, which allegedly he took away forcibly from the branch manager. In this regard mere pleadings are no substitute of proof. In such circumstances, the real witness who could have proved alleged misconduct was branch manager himself. Though this fact has come on record that he is not in service but it is not the case ofthe management that said witness was not traceable. It reveal from the proceedings of the case that despite request ofthe workman, the management has not produced the said witness for reason best known to it. Had the management being fair enough to examine him in support ofalleged misconduct against him, it could have been established in cross examination that charge is fabricated by the evidence obtained in cross examination from him . Examination ofthe Branch Manager Sh . Bithal would have revealed whether the complaint made by him in the register ofrecord (C-53) was correct or not and to establish that he was the best person to speak to its veracity. In 1956. Lab. I.C. 1166, Hon'ble Calcutta High Court has observed that there was a fundamental breach of principle of natural justicewhen real witness who could have either proved or disproved the charge were held back from the enquiry though proposed to be examined and the Vigilance Inspector was made and lead evidence not on his ownbut onhis information alleged to have been derived from those persons. This is a clear case ofbreach ofthe said principle because had the prosecution being fair enough to examine those witnesses it could have been well established in cross examination that either they do not support charge 6110

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

37. In regard toback wages it is pertinent to mention that workman was discharged from service in the year 1995 and reference has been made in the year 1999. The reference under adjudication is pending for last 10 years and it reveals from the perusal of the order sheets of the proceedings of the case that the workman had moved number of applications time and again including two applications for transferring the present reference to some other Tribunal . It also reveal from the perusal of various order sheets of the proceedings of the case particularly dated 22-6-04 , 21-7-04, 20-03-06 and 15-05-08 that the workman himself has linger on the proceedings unnecessarily.

38. The initial burden to prove that after discharging him from service , the workman did not remain in gainful employmentwas on the workman . In this regard workman has stated on oath that he is handicapped and his wife had cancerand she ultimately died during this period and he has remained out ofjob . He has also stated that his relatives have been helping him and he did not remain in gainful employment. In rebuttal , there is no evidence of the managements. Admittedly, the workman was initially appointed as Peon in the year 1980 and promoted as Clerk- cum-Cashier in the year 1990. Keeping in view the considerableperiod of services rendered by the workman and his age, having regard to entire facts and circumstances of the case the interest of justice would subserved by awarding 50% back wages only.

39. Accordingly, the reference is adjudicated in favour ofthe workman to this extent that he is entitled for reinstatement with 50% back wages , the payment shallbe made within 8 weeks from the date of publication ofthe award failingwhich it shall carry interest @ 8% p.a. 40. Award as above.

N.K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer Lucknow: 05-05-2009

नई दिल्ली, 14 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2792.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेटेलाईट अर्थ स्टेशन, बी.एस.एन.एल. , सिकन्दराबाद के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 149/89 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-40012/1/88- डी-2 (बी) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 14th September, 2009 S.O. 2792. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 149/89)

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)] ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Satelite Earth Station BSNL , Sikandrabad and their workman, which was received by theCentral Government on 14-09-2009 .

[No. L-40012/ 1/88 -D -2 (B)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R. K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NO. 1 , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI I.D. No. 149/89

Shri Ram Singh,

S/o Shri Shankar,

R/o . Village Khaguawas , P.O. Sikandrabad, Distt.

Workman Bulandshahar , U.P.

Versus

TheDivisional Engineer,

Satelite Earth Station,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,

Sikandrabad,

Bulandshahar, U.P.

.. Management

AWARD

Obsession of the Tribunal led it to conclude that erstwhile Telecom Satelite Maintenance Earth Station, Sikandrabad, was not an Industry. Accordingly an award waspassed on 1st of December, 1997 , declaring therein thatreference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( in short the Act) was incompetent . Parties were directed to approach the appropriate Government or forum for redressal of their grievance . The award, so passed, was assailed before the High Court of Delhi . The Hon'ble High Courtconcludedthat the management was Industry, relying the precedent laid by the Apex Court in Sriniwas Rao ( 1998 L.I.C. 883 ) and the award was set aside . The matter was remitted back to this Tribunal for adjudication. Partieswere called upon to adduce their evidence. The projected that evidence has already been led by them . They opted not to adduce any other evidence . For adjudication of the dispute, the facts gain importance,

2. As borne out of the record, Ram Singh was employed withthe management on 17th of May, 1983. Не workedwith them for a period of more than three years . His services were dispensed with on 5-8-1986 . He raised an industrial dispute before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliationproceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide 6111 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजयत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

Order No. L-40012/1/88 -D-2(B ) dated 2-5-1989 , with followingterms :-

management. Written submissions were filed by the parties. I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the bar and cautiously perused the record. My findings on issues involved in the controversy are as follows:

"Whether the action of the management of D.E.T. Satelite Maintenance, Satelite Earth Station, Sikandrabad (U.P. ) in terminating the services of Shri Ram Singh Driver w.e. f. 5-8-1986 is justified ? If not,towhat relief the workman is entitled to ?"

3. Claim statement was filed, wherein Ram Singh pleadedthat hejoined services ofthe management as driver on 17-5-1983 in the capacity ofdaily rated employee .He is anex-serviceman. He was serving the management with diligence and sincerety. On 21st of May, 1986, Om Parkash, anemployee of the management met with an accident, while performing his duties. He was removed to a hospitalwhere he succumbed to his injury on 26-5-1986. No compensation was given to his dependents . As such he expressed sympathetic views in favour of the deceased employee. It annoyed the management . His services were terminated on 5-8-1986 , without any notice or pay in lieu thereof. Retrenchment compensation was not paid. Though hewas employed as a daily rated workman yet he was performing functions of a driver, which was a job of permanent nature . Action of terminating his services is illegal and uncalled for.He seeks reinstatement of service with continuity and fullbackwages.

7. Ram Singh swears that he was appointed as driver by the Satelite Earth Station, Sikandrabad, on 17-5-1983. Though hewas appointed as a driver, yet he was paid his wages as daily rated mazdoor. His work was of high quality andto the satisfaction of his superiors . He had not given anycause ofcomplaint to them. On 21st of May, 1986 at about 5 P.M. Divisional Engineer ordered Om Parkash to repair his personal telephone, by climbing on pole, Om Parkashwas working on the pole. High tension electric line was going above that pole . He came in contact with high tensionelectric line , met with an accident and was seriously injured.Hewas removed to a hospital .When his condition deteriorated, he was removed to Delhi for treatment . Om Parkash expired on 26-5-1986 . No compensation was paid tohis dependents as such his wife also expired . He started having sympathy with the bereaved family, which fact annoyed the Divisional Engineer. On 5-8-1986 Divisional Engineer misbehaved with him and terminated his services. He approached the authorities for reinstatement of his services. Subsequently allegations were levelled on him to theeffect that he had abandoned hisjob. During the course ofhis cross -examination he admits that letter Ex . M1 bears his signatures. He projects that when asked to resume his duty, he reported back to his duty. Instead of giving him job ofa driver, he was asked to dig a pit and thereafter he was abused. As such he returned back.

4.Contest wasgiven to his claim by the management, pleading that Ram Singh was employed as daily wages mazdoor. Singh he was an ex-serviceman having valid driving licence , he was asked to drive station vehicle as andwhen required. His performance was not satisfactory. Hiscontrolling officer gave him warning in that regard. He apologized, after that warning. He was irresponsible towards his duties and caused an accident . He also asked for bribes, from motor workshop, where vehicle had gone for repair. Under these circumstances vehicle was withdrawn from him and he was given some work of daily rated mazdoor. Thereafter he stopped coming for his duties . His services were not terminated. During the course of conciliation proceedings , an offer was given to him tojoinjob ofdaily rated mazdoor, which offer was not accepted by him . Position ofa driver falls under group ' C ' category while he was a daily rated mazdoor, which position falls under group "D". Position of a driver is to be filled by way ofa test by TelecomDistrict Manager Ghaziabad. The claim submitted by the workman is baseless and liable to be dismissed.

5. Workman tendered his affidavit in his evidence . He was cross - examined at length on behalf of the management . Ram Dass J.T.O. tendered his affidavit in evidence on behalf of the management. He too was cross- examined at length on behalf of the workman. No other witness was examined on behalf ofthe parties.

8.Ram Dass swears in his affidavit that Ram Singh was engaged as a daily rated mazdoor . Since he was holding a driving licence , he was asked to drive vehicle as and whenrequired.He was not discharging his duties properly and warned for his lapses . He apologized. He caused accident to the vehicle by his sheer negligence . He asked forbribery from Motor Repair Workshop , where thevehicle hadgone for repairs . Since he failed to discharge duties of adriver, vehicle was withdrawn from him .He was asked to discharge other duties ofa daily rated mazdoor. Ram Singh refusedtoperform those duties and stopped reporting for theduty. Post ofdriver is grade " C" post and can be filled bythe District Manager, Ghaziabad, Divisional Engineer, Satelite Maintenance , Sikandrabad, had no authority to appoint any person as a driver. During the course of conciliationproceedings Ram Singh was offered a job but herefused tojoin his duties . During the course of his cross- examination he concedes that Ram Singh worked from 17-5-1983 to 5-8-1986. He projects that Ram Singh was treated as skilled labour and paid as such . He further concedes that no charge-sheet was ever served on him.

9. As testified by the workman and conceded by Shri Ram Dass, Ram Singh was appointed by the 6. Arguments were heard at the bar. Shri Mukul Sharma A/R presented facts on behalf of the workman. Shri R. V. Sinha A/R advanced arguments on behalf on the

3540G1/2009-16 6112

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

management on 17-5-1983 . He worked with the management upto5-8-1986 . It is not the case of the management that there was no continuity in the service rendered by Shri Ram Singh . Consequently it is emerging over the record that Ram Singh rendered a continuous service with the management for more than 3 years .

underskilled category. Out of the facts projected by Ram Dass it is evident that Ram Singh was employed as skilled employee and was paid for that job. What type of skilled job was taken from Ram Singh, emerge out of the facts unfoldedby Ram Dass. He projects that since Ram Singh was having a driving licence he was asked to drive the station vehicle. Job of a driver falls in skilled category. Ram Singh holds a valid driving licence and was askedto drive the station vehicle. Therefore, it is evident that though Ram Singh wasemployed as a daily rated mazdoor, yet job ofadriverwas taken from him. Not only that he was asked to drive station vehicle but he was paid for that job . Therefore, it is evident that Ram Singh was employed as a driverinthe grab of employing him as a daily rated mazdoor. Heperformed functions of driver for more than 3 years .

13. Contention of the management that when Ram Singh was asked to perform job of a daily rated mazdoor thenhe stopped coming to his duties , is found to be devoid ofreasons.When Ram Singh was employed as a driver, it was not within the competence of the management to ask him to perform job of a daily rated mazdoor . The management ought to have asked him to performjob of a skilled employee . Asking him to dig a pitch is to humiliate hislabour. Therefore , Ram Singh was justified in refusing to perform work of a daily rated mazdoor, which was not of skilled category.

10. " Continuous Service" has been defined by Section 25B of the Act. Under sub- section ( 1 ) of the said section,"continuous service for a period " may comprise of two period viz . ( i ) uninterrupted service , and ( ii) interrupted service on account of (a) sickness , (b ) authorized leave, (c) an accident, (d) a strike which is not legal, (e ) a lock-out, and (f) a cessation of work that is not due to any fault on the part of the workman, shall be included in the "continuous service ." Sub- section (2) of the said section introduces a fiction to the effect that even if a workman is not in" continuous service " within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months , he shall be deemed to in continuous service for that period under an employer if he has actually worked for the days specified inclauses (a) and (b ) thereof. InVijay Kumar Majoo ( 1968 Lab . I.C.1180) it was held that one year's period contemplatedby sub-section (2) furnished a unit of measure and ifduring that unit of measure the period of service actually rendered by the workman is 240 days , then he can be considered to have rendered one year's continuous service for the purpose of the section: The idea is that if within a unit period of one year a person had put in at least 240 daysof service, then he must get the benefit conferred by the Act . Consequently, an enquiry has to be made to findout whether the workman has actually worked for not less than240 days during a period of 12 calandar months immediately preceding the retrenchment.

14. When Ram Singh refused to perform job of unskilled category, he was turned out ofthejob. He presents that he was abused and removed out of the service. It has not been projected by Ram Dass that Ram Singh sought voluntary retirement from service or he reached the age of superannuation and was made to retire. It was not the case thathis services came to an end on non renewal of term of contract of employment. His services were not done away on the ground of his continued ill health . Consequently termination of his service amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of Section 2 (oo) of the Act .

11.At the cost ofreplication, it is said that Ram Singh was retrenched on 5-8-1986 . He was engaged by the management on 17-5-1983 . Management no where claims that his service was interrupted for any reasons other than those detailed in sub-section ( 1) of Section 25B of theAct. Herendered more than 240 days continuous service during the period 12 calendar months immediately preceding the dateofhis retrenchment viz . 5th August, 1986. His case is covered within the definition of ' continuous service" as enacted in Section 25B of the Act . Therefore , it is appropriate to conclude that Ram Singh acquired status of anindustrial employee , on rendering continuous service ofthree years with the management .

15. Ram Singh projects that his services were dispensed with abruptly on 5-8-1986 . Shri Ram Dass nowhere presents that notice or pay in lieu thereof was given to Ram Singh while terminating his services . Retrenchment compensation was not paid to him . The management was under an obligation to pay him compensation for retrenchment and the time of retrenchment . Payment of retrenchment compensation is a condition precedent to a valid order of retrenchment . Precedents inBombay Union of Journalists case [ 1964 ( 1 ) LLJ 351 ] , Adaishwar Lal ( 1970 Lab . I.C. 936) and B. M. Gupta [ 1979 ( 1 ) LLJ 168 ] announce that subsequent payment of compensation cannot validate an invalid order ofretrenchment . As retrenchment compensation was not paid to Ram Singh , consequently action of the management falls within the mischief of Section 25 -F of the Act .

16. An attempt was made by the management to project that offer was given to Ram Singh to come on job 12. Ram Singh asserts that he was employed as a driverby the management . On the other hand Ram Dass projects that Ram Singh was employed as a daily rated mazdoor . He went on to depose that since Ram Singh was holding a driving licence , he was asked to drive the station vehicle as and when required. In his testimony he concedes that Ram Singh was treated as a skilled labour and paid for that category. Shri Sinha had to cut a sorry figure when he was questioned as to whether a daily rated mazdoor falls [ भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

6113

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

but he had not accepted it . Ram Singh presents that in pursuance of the said offer he reported for duty where he was asked to dig a pit. He was abused and as such he left. These facts get strength through the events presented by Ram Dass , who tried to unfold that Ram Singh had not performed job of a daily rated mazdoor. When a skilled employee is asked to perform job of daily rated mazdoor, it amounts to dishonour his work. Consequently action of the management is found to be unjustified. In that situation ifthe workman opts to leave the job it cannot be said that he abandoned the employment. Therefore, contention of the management is found to be uncalled for.

17. Services ofthe workman were retrenched without payment of notice pay, and retrenchment compensation. It iswell settled that in a case of wrongful retrenchment, dismissal or discharge , the normal rule is to award reinstatement . But where a case falls in any of the exception togeneral rule, the industrial adjudicator has discrition to award reasonable and adequate compensation, in lieu of reinstatement . Section 11A of the Act vests the industrial adjudicator with discretionary jurisdiction to give ' such other reliefto the workman' in lieu ofdischarge or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require , where for some valid reasons it considers that reinstatement with or without conditions will not be fair or proper.

18. As deposed by the workman , he is an ex-serviceman. He joined Indian Army after attaining the age ofmajority, where he served for 15 days to get pension. Thereafter he got employment with the management, whom he served for more than three years . It is not the case ofthe workman that he joined services of the management soon after his retirement from Indian Army. Hence there was some gap oftime in between, which was not been spelled by the workman. He was retrenched on 5th August, 1986. Therefore on the date of his retrenchment, age of Ram Singh comes to be above 37 years in all eventualities . Long 23 years have elapsed after his retrenchment. Calculation of above period make it clear that by now Ram Singh has reached the age of superannuation. Consequently, circumstances do not justify an order of reinstatement in service, with or without conditions, to be passed in favour ofthe workman.

19. Retrenchment ofRam Singh is held to be wrongful .. Consequently, this Tribunal has to award compensation to the workman in lieu of his reinstatement . No definite yardstick for measuring the quantum of compensation is available . In S. S. Shetty [ 1957 ( 11 ) LLJ696] the Apex Court indicated some relevant factors which an adjudicator has totake into account in computing compensation in lieu of reinstatement , in the following words:

"The industrial Tribunal would have to take into account the terms and conditions ofemployment, the tenure of service, the possibility of termination ofthe employinent at the instance of either party, the possibility of retrenchment by the employer or resignation or retirement by the workman and even ofthe employer himself ceasing to exist or of the workmanbeing awarded various benefits including reinstatement under the terms offuture awards by industrial Tribunal in the event of industrial disputes arising between the parties in future....... In computing the money value ofthe benefits of reinstatement, the industrial adjudicator would also have to take into account the present value of what his salary, benefits etc.wouldbe tillhe attained the age of superannuation and the value of such benefits would have to be computedas from the date when such reinstatement was ordered under the terms of the award.

Having regard to the considerations detailed above, it is impossible to compute the money value of this benefit of reinstatement awarded to the appellant with mathematical exactitude and the best that any tribunal or court would do under the circumstances would be to make as correct as estimate as is possible bearing, of course in mind all the relevant factors pro and con."

20. ADivisional Bench of the Patna High Court inB. Choudhary Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court , Jamshedpur ( 1983 ) Lab . 1, 1755 (1758 ) deduced certain guidelines which have to be borne in mind in determining the quantum of compensation viz . (i ) the back wages receivable; ( ii ) compensation for deprivation of the job with future prospect and obtainability of alternative employment, (iii) employee's age; (iv) Length of service in the establishment ; (v) capacity of the employer to pay and the nature of the employer's business ; (vi ) gainful employment in mitigation of damages ; and (vii ) circumstances leading to the disengagement and the past conduct. These factors are only illustrative and not exhaustive. In addition to the amount of compensation. It is also within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to award interest on the amount determined as compensation. Furthermore , the rate of such interest is also in the discretion ofthe Tribunal. Reference can be madetoTabesh Process, Shivakashi (1989 Lab . I. C. 1887) ..

21. In Assam Oil Co. Ltd. ( 1960 ( 1 ) LLJ 587] theApex Court took into account countervailing facts that the employer had paid certain sums to the workmen and her own earning in the alternative employment and ordered that" it would be fair and just to direct the appellant a substantial sum as compensation to her. " In Utkal Machinery Ltd. [ 1966 ( 1 ) LLJ 398 ] the amount of compensation equivalent to two year salary ofthe employee awarded by the industrial Tribunal was reduced by the Supreme Court to an amount equivalent to one year salary ofthe employee in view of the fact that she had been in service with the employer only for 5 months and alsotook into consideration the unusual manner of her appointment at the instance of the Chief Minister of the State . In 6114

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 14 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2793.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 93/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/424/99-आई.आर. ( सी- I ) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 14th September, 2009

S.O. 2793. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 93/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on14-09-2009 .

[No. L-20012/424/99- IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

A. K. Roy [ 1970 (1 ) LLJ 228 ] compensation equivalent to two years salarylast drawn by the workmen was held tobe fairandproper to meet the ends ofjustice . In Anil Kumar Chakaraborty [ 1962 ( 11 ) LLJ 483 ] the Count converted the award of reinstatement into compensation of a sum of Rs. 50,000 asjust and fair compensation in full satisfaction ofall his claims for wrongful dismissal from service . InO. P. Bhandari [ 1986 (11 ) LLJ 509] . TheApex Court observed that itwas afit case for grant of compensation in view of reinstatement. The Court awarded compensation equivalent to3.33 years salary as reasonable. In M. K. Aggarwal ( 1988 Lab. I.C. 380), the Apex Court though confirmed the order ofreinstatement yet restricted the back salary to 50% of what would otherwise be payable to the employee. In Yashveer Singh (1993 Lab . I.C. 44) the court directed payment ofRs . 75,000 in view ofreinstatement with back wages . In Nabal Kishore [ 1984 ( 11 ) LLJ 473 ] the Apex Courtobserved that in view of the special circumstances ofthecase adequate compensation wouldbe in the interest ofthe appellant. A sum of Rs . 2 lac was awarded as compensation in lieu of reinstatement. In Sant Raj [ 1985 ( 11 ) LLJ 19] a sum ofRs. 2 lac was awarded as compensation inlieu ofreinstatement. In Chandu Lal ( 1985 Lab. L.C. 12225) acompensation ofRs . 2 lac by way ofback wages in lieu of reinstatement was awarded. In Ras Bihari ( 1988 Lab . I.C. 107) a compensation ofRs . 65,000 was granted in lieu of reinstatement, since the employee was gainfully employed elsewhere. In V. V. Rao ( 1991 Lab. I.C. 1650) a compensation ofRs. 2.50 lac was awarded in lieu of reinstatement .

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 1), DHANBAD

Inthe matter ofa reference under Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) and (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reference No. 93 of2000

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Godhar Colliery ofM/s . BCCL .

AND

TheirWorkman .

PRESENT :

Sri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES :

State: Jharkhand

Forthe Employers Forthe Workman Sri H. Nath , Advocate : None Industry : Coal

Dated, 31st August , 2009 AWARD

22. In view of above propositions, case of the workman isto be considered. Ram Singh was retrenched bythe management on 5-8-1986. He was getting wages of a skilled employee . He was having more than 20 years of service at that time. These facts are to be taken into consideration while awarding compensation to the workmen.However, he was getting pension from the Indian Army, which fact is to be balanced. These facts tilt the scale in favour of the workmen. Neither the workmen nor the management had brought it over the record as towhat were the minimum wages in state of U.P. , payable to an skilled employee . However, more thari 20 years of service whichtheworkmen was to render is a yard stick which isto be reckoned. On the date of his retrenchment the workmen had rendered more than 3 years of service . The workmen had to fight for redressal of his grievances for more than two decades . Taking into account all these facts, it is ordered that the management shall pay five years of wages to the workmen to be reckoned on the basis ofthe minimum wages ofa skilled employee , as prevalent in preceding five years on the date ofthe order. The amount of compensation shall be paid to the workmen within a period of one month from the date, when this award becomes enforceable. In the event of delay the management shall be under an obligation to pay interest @ 12% p.a. till the date of realization . The Award is accordinglypassed.

ByorderNo. L-20012/ 424/99 - IR (C-I) , dated 2-2-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has . in Dr. R. K. YADAV, Presiding Officer [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

6115

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section(1)and sub-section (2A) ofSection 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal .

"Whether the action of the management ofGodhar Colliery ofM/ s . BCCL in not referring Shri Chotu Rajwar to appear before Medical Board for determination of his age is justified ? If not, what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"

Thisreference case was received in this Tribunal on 23-2-2000. Thereafter notices were sent to the parties to file written statement by the sponsoring union/ workman , In spite ofnotices sent by speed post, no written statement hasbeen filed by the workman till 18-6-2009. It, therefore, appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case.

In such circumstances, I render No Dispute Award inthis reference case.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली , 14 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2794.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार टाटा आयरन एण्ड स्टील कम्पनी लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 197/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/66/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 14th September, 2009 S.O. 2794. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 197/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 14-9-2009.

[No. L-20012/66/2000- IR (C - 1 )] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1),

DHANBAD

PRESENT:

Shri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer

Inthe matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10 (1)(d) of I.D. Act, 1947

Reference No. 197 of 2000

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the management of Bokaro Colliery ofM/s . Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd... P.O. Ghatotand, Distt. Hazaribagh and their workman.

APPEARANCES :

Onbehalf of the workman : Mr. D.Mukherjee. Advocate

Onbehalfof the employers : Mr. D. K.Verma, Advocate

State: Jharkhand Industry: Coal Dated, Dhanbad, the 31st August, 2009

AWARD

TheGovt. of India, Ministry ofLabour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Section 10 ( 1 )( d) of theIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/66/2000 -I.R. (C- 1 ), dated the 29th June, 2000 .

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bokaro CollieryofM/s. Tata Iron and Steel CompanyLtd. , P.O. Ghatotand Distt . Hazaribagh to dismiss the services ofSmt . Meena Kumari Singh, ClerkGr. III is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, towhat reliefis the workman concerned entitled ?"

2.The case of the concerned lady as disclosed in her Written Statement is that she was originally appointed on 4-7-1990 as Clerk Grade- III against land. Shri Chote Prasad Sahu and his co-sharer had executed an agreement to sell of land and they nominated the name of the concerned ladyand she accordinglywas appointed . The management issued another appointment letter dated 13-5-91 appointing the concerned lady as Clerk Grade- III for the reasons mentioned above. Since then she had been working as permanent Grade- III Clerk with unblemished record of service. Being satisfied with the performance of the concerned lady management promoted her to the post of ClerkGrade- II by order dated 18-12-1993 . As the used to ventilate her own and other workman's grievances the management was very much biased and prejudiced against her. Ithasbeen alleged that the management with an ulterior motive to victimise her issued a false, frivolous and motivated charge- sheet dated 2-5-97. The allegation as levelled in the charge- sheet does not constitute any misconduct under the provision of the Standing Orders. The concerned lady was never appointed on the strength of any educational certificate which is evident from the appointment letter issued to her by the management. However, the concerned lady submitted her reply denying the charges emphatically. Though the reply submitted by the concerned lady was satisfactory enough till then the 6116

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] management constituted an invalid and irregular departmental enquiry through a biased and prejudiced EnquiryOfficer. It has been alleged that the charge- sheet issued to the concerned lady was issued by an unauthorised person. It has further been alleged that the enquiryproceeding conducted against the concerned lady was not held fairly and properly and the enquiry officer conducted the domestic enquiry in utter violation of the principle of natural justice. It has been alleged by the concerned lady that she was not given full opportunity to cross-examine the management's witness nor allowed to adduceher full evidence . It has further been alleged by her that though the charges against her was not established yet the management dismissed her from service . The concerned lady was dismissed by an order dated 9/12-3-1998 by the Dy. General Manager , West Bokaro Colliery. The management also issued another dismissal order dated 15-12-98 under the signature of General Manager, West Bokaro assigning the ground that the first dismissal order was kept in abeyance . The concerned lady has further alleged that she was not paid monthly wages and other attendant benefits for the period from 9/12-3-1998 to 15-12-98. Thereafter the concerned lady raised an industrial dispute before the ALC ( C) Hazaribagh which resulted reference to this Tribunal for adjudication . It has been prayed on behalf of the concerned lady to pass an Award directing the management to reinstate her in service with full back wages and other consequential benefits from the date of her dismissal .

3. In the Written Statement filed on behalf of the management it has been stated that the present reference is not legally maintainable . The present reference is arising out of an individual dispute as no union sponsored the case ofthe concerned lady. They have further stated that the concerned lady was given appointment as temporary Clerk Grade - III at West Bokaro Colliery by appointment letter dated 29-6/4-7-1990 . It was given in consideration of the fact that Sri Chote Prasad Sahu and his co-sharers executed an agreement for sale of 9.10 and 2.11 acres of rayati land to Khata No. 48 and 13 respectively of village Barughuttu and they nominated her name for employment . The aforesaid letter of employment was issued under the signature of Divisional Manager of West Bokaro Colliery. The concerned lady was given appointment against permanent vacant post of Clerk Grade - III on probation for a period of 6 months subject to confirm after observing satisfactory performance ofher duties, by letter dated 5-4./ 13-5-91 . The aforesaid letter was also issued under the signature of the same officer who was working as Divisional Manager ofWest Bokaro Colliery.

Ithas further been submitted on behalf of the management that the concerned lady at the time of appointment submitted the Secondary School Certificate No. B 153565 having the Roll Code No. 1404 and Roll No.02538 indicating that she has passed the matriculation

examination in the year 1977from P. N. D. J. M. P. School , Ishri Bazar, Giridih . She has also put her signature on the service card declaring the above particulars. However, on verification it was observed that the aforesaid documents were not genuine and the same documents have been fabricated with the aim and object of obtaining an appointment on a clerical post for which minimum educational qualification is matriculation . The aforesaid document also indicated her date ofbirth for recording in the service record . As the acts committed by the concerned lady amounted to fraud and dishonesty, she was issued a charge-sheet dated 24-4-97/ 2-5-97 under the signature of Deputy Divisional Manager ( P & S) , West Bokaro who was the head of the department and was the controlling authority of the concerned lady. Moreover, he was also the disciplinary authority in respect ofthe concerned lady. In her replyto the charge- sheet the concerned lady submitted thatthe allegations levelled against her in the charge - sheet were misconceived and baseless and the certificates produced by her were genuine and true . She denied having committed the misconduct of fraud and dishonesty as charged against her in violation of the provisions of the Standing Order. The Disciplinary Authority appointed Sri Prakash George, Senior Officer (P) Services Group , West Bokaro Colleries as Enquiry Officer and Sri I. R. Sandys, as Management Representative and fixed the date of enquiry on 14-5-97 and issued the letter dated 9/12-5-97 to the concerned lady, the Enquiry Officer and to the Management Representative. In pursuance of the aforesaid letter of the Disciplinary Authority, the EnquiryOfficer conducted the departmental enquiry after issuing notices of enquiry on different dates and the enquiry was conducted in the presence ofthe concerned lady all throughout. She was givenopportunity to engage any co - worker of her choice . She did not engage any co - worker and she conducted the defenceby herself. It has further been submitted on behalf ofthe management that she was given full opportunityto cross-examine the Management witnesses , to give her own statement , to produce her defence documents as well as witnesses. She did not make any allegation against the Enquiry Officer or procedure of enquiry adopted by him . The enquiry was conducted fairly and properly keeping in view the principle of natural justice. Thereafter the enquiry officer closed the proceeding and submitted enquiry report holding the concerned lady guilty of the charges levelled against her. After completion of all formalities, the disciplinary authority put up the matter before the Agent (North Group) West Bokaro who was superior to the disciplinary authority for his consideration on the findings ofthe Enquiry Officer and all documents connected with the departmental enquiry. The Agent (North Group) , West Bokaro examined the enquiry report, the enquiry proceedings and all submissions of the concerned lady and came to the conclusion that she committed the misconduct of fraud and dishonesty under clause 27 (2) of the Certified Standing Orders of the Company and, 6117 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

accordingly, she was dismissed from services by Deputy General Manager, West Bokaro by order dated 9/ 11-3-98 witheffect from 16-3-98 . The Union took up the case ofthe concerned lady before the General Manager with a request to review the order of dismissal passed against the concerned lady by the Deputy General Manager and accordingly, the General Manager discussed the matter with the union and verified genuinity of the documents produced by the concerned lady from the Bihar Secondary School Examination Board, Patna and after getting letter fromthecompetent authorities and the same was informed to the union representatives . Thereafter the General Manager ofWest Bokaro Colliery did not find any merit to review the action already taken by the Deputy General Manager who was superior officer to the disciplinary authority and issued the letter dated 15-12-98 finally dismissing the concerned lady as per the provision of Certified Standing Orders of the Company.

It has been prayed on behalf of the management to pass an Award holding the dismissal of the concerned lady as legal , bona fide and justified and that she is not entitledto get any relief.

4. Both the sides have filed their respective rejoinder admitting and denying the contents of some of the paras ofeach other's Written Statement .

employment in the company. She was charged for committing fraud and dishonesty in connection with company'sbusiness . The main allegation in the charge- sheet is for submitting fake certificate for securing employment as Clerk Grade- III . The Ld. Advocate for the concernedworkman has referred appointment letter dated 4-7-80marked as Ext . W- 1 . This appointment letter will show that the concerned workman was not appointed on the basis of Secondary School Certificate, rather she was appointed on the strength of land looser Scheme. So it has been argued that the charge -sheet is illegal and void and onthis score alone dismissal was illegal and unjustified. On behalf of the management Mr. I. R. Sandys has been examined as MW - 1 . This witness in course of his evidence has stated that he was not the Enquiry Officer and he was representative of the management . He has not adduced any evidence to prove that the secondary school certificate is forged and not genuine and that the concerned lady was appointed on the strength of Secondary School Certificate andthat for appointment in Clerk Grade- III Matriculate is the minimum qualification. Management witness in cross- examination admitted that Meena Kumari was appointed as per Land Looser Scheme and he proved appointment letter Ext. W- 1 . He further admitted that no authority of Secondary School Board or School Authority was produced and examined in the domestic enquiry and no authority was examined before the Hon'ble Tribunal. The workman side has referred the relevant portion of cross- examination of MW- 1 which is as follows :-

5.While considering the fairness and propriety of the domestic enquiry it was decided by this Tribunal vide OrderNo. 35 dated 17-11-2008 to dispose of the issues , whether preliminary or otherwise on the same time in view ofthejudgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 1983-84 Supreme Court cases (L & S) 527. Accordingly after conclusion of evidence from both sides the case was heard on merit .

"No person ofBihar Secondary Board was examined before the domestic enquiry. There was correspondence with the Secondary Board from which it transpires certificate and marksheet and school leaving certificate . Again says there was nocorrespondence with the Board, rather there was correspondence with the Principal ofthe School from which she had appeared in the examination . Neither any official of the School was examined during domestic enquiry nor any Admission Register ofthe School was produced in the said enquiry proceeding. "

6.Management in order to substantiate their case has produced Mr. I. R. Sandys and examined him as MW- 1 . On their behalf documents were marked as Ext . M - 1 to M- 21 . Workmanside also produced the concernedworkman who has been examined as WW - 1 . On their behalfdocuments were marked as Ext . W- 1 , W- 2 and W-3.

7. It has been argued on behalf of the workman that the concerned lady Meena Kumari Singh was originally appointed on 4-7-90 as Clerk Grade - III under land looser Scheme. Chota Pd. Sahu and co - sharer had executed an agreement with the management to sell the land for mining purpose and inview of that the concerned workman was appointed as Clerk Grade- III . The concerned workmanwas promoted to Clerk Grade - II by an Office order dated 18-12-93 . The management issued the concerned workman a false and frivolous charge -sheet dated 2-5-97 under the signature ofDy. Divisional Manager on the allegation that allegedly the concerned lady had produced fake and forged secondary examination certificate while obtaining

The concerned lady Meena Kumari on oath stated that the educational certificate produced by her before the management was genuine and she produced matriculation certificate , Marksheet and Intermediate Certificate marked as Ext . W- 1 , W-2 and W-3 . But the statement of this witness remained unchallenged in cross -examination . Nobody can appear in the intermediate examination unless he/she passes matric examination . The concerned workman appeared in the Intermediate Examination and also passed Intermediate Examination. So the allegation of not passing matric examination is prima facie illegal and unfortunate. It has been argued that as per law averment made in the written statement cannot take the place of proof and pleading is no substitute to prove. As per law oral evidence 6118

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] has to be adduced to prove the please. In support oftheir contention they have referred to a decision reported in AIR 1982 , page 385 between National Insurance Co. Vs. Yogendra Nath in which their Lordships of the Hon'ble AllahabadHigh Court has held:

"The averments contained in the written statement cannot take the place of proof unless evidence is producedbythe interested party. "

They have also referred to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2005 ( 105) FIR 1067 between Manager, Reserve Bank of India Vs. S. Many in which theirLordship of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held the following:-

"Pleadings are no substitute for proof. "

prior to dismissal . The witness WW- 1 was not cross- examined. So the statement made in examination in chief is admitted. In this connection the workman side had referred tothe judgement of Patna High Court reported in AIR 1940 page 683 and Delhi High Court reported in 1977 Cr. L.J. page410. The management witness (MW- 1 ) also admitted this fact that after enquiry and before dismissal no second show cause notice was issued to her. So on this score alone the dismissal was illegal and void - abinitio. In this respect the workman side has referred to the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court reported in ( 1) Current Labour Report ( SC) 1991 page 61 , (2) 2003 (3) JCR page 698 ( JH) , 2002 (94) FLR page 1076 [ Allahabad High Court, (4) 2004 (I ) JLJR page 382 (J.H. ) and (5) 2008 (2) JLJR page 573 ] J. H. The workman side has also referred to a decision reported in 1989 Lab I.C. page 1043 ( SC) in which their Lordship has held that in industrial law the fight is between two unequals , so justice should be tempered with mercy. It has been further argued that the dismissal of the concerned lady who already underwent by-pass surgery and also suffering from cancer was not only illegal and void abinitio but also against humanity. So she is legally entitled for reinstatement with full back wages . In this connection they have referred the judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in SCC Vol-3 page 808 and S.C.L.J. Vol. 15page65.

8.Ld. Advocate for the managementhas referred the judgement reported in SCLJ Vol . 7 page 512-555, 2008 SCC (L & S ) page 890 , 2008 S.C.C. (L & S) page 298 and 2009 S.C.C. (L & S) page 126 , Supreme Court. In the judgement reported in SCLJ Vol . 7 page 512-555 . Their Lorship of theHon'ble Supreme Court held:-

Theappointment letter ofthe concerned workman will show that the concerned workman was not appointed on the basis of Secondary School Certificate . The management also miserably failed to adduce any oral evidence or document toprove the fact that the certificate is not genuine . The concerned workman also proved the matriculation certificate and marksheet and Intermediate Certificate which shows that the matriculation certificate was genuine and so shewas allowed to appear in the Intermediate examinaton and she procured Intermediate Certificate . The management miserably failedto prove the charges of submitting forged Matriculaton/Intermediate Certificate.The managment even did not examine the alleged Principal/Head Master of the School in the domestic enquiry or in the Tribunal . The workman submitted that non -examination of witness on whose alleged letter the management reached the conclusion of sumitting forged certificate by the workman ipso facto illegal and void ab initio. In this respect the workmanside has referred to a decision reported in 2008 (4) JLJR page 508 ( J.Hs.) Santosh Kumar Dubey Vs. Steel Authority of India. In the said judgement their Lordship has held the following :-

"Industrial Disputes Act, 147 S. 11 - A-Domestic Enquiry held by employer-Power of Tribunal to interfere with finding of misconduct Recorded in enquiry-Cases where proper and valid domestic enquiry was held before passing order of punishment-Power of Tribunal previous to enactment of Section 11 -A and position subsequently changed by this section-Cases where no enquiry was held by employer or enquiry held was defective-Power of employer to adduce evidence tojustify order of discharge or dismissal ."

Inthejudgement reported in 2008 SCC ( L & S) page 890Their Lordship of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held the following:-

"Dismissal- Petitioner allegedly secured appointment on the basis of forged displacement certificate report submitted by Enquiry Officer without making any enquiry- DPLR on whose letter findings was a arrived at that petitioner was not a displaced person , was never examined by Enquiry Officer nor such letter ever supplied to the petitioner findings recorded by Enquiry Officer and order ofdismissal is bad and unsustainable . "

The management as per law cannot justify the order of dismissal on any grounds other than the grounds mentioned in the chargesheet which is reported in 1956 ( II) LLJ page 439 (SC) .

The concerned workman WW - 1 in her evidence in chiefexamination has sated that the copies of the enquiry proceeding and report were not supplied to her before her dismissal nor any second show cause notice was issued

"Industrial Disputes Act , 1947-Section 11A- Labour or Industrial Tribunal cannot act as if it were anappellate body-Appreciation of evidence-Held, where two views are possible on evidence, Industrial Tribunal should be very slow in interfering with the findings arrived at in domestic enquiry-Standard ofproof in domestic enquiry is preponderance of probabilities and not proof beyond reasonable doubt-It was improper for the Tribunal to interfere [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii ) ]

6119

भारत का राजप : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

with the findings of domestic enquiry on the ground that there was no independent evidence apart from Management witnesses-Plea of alibi accepted by the Tribunal in this case , also not based on evidence Award of the Tribunal therefore set aside and dismissal order passed by Management restored-However , general proposition of law accepted that Labour Court can award lesser punishment in a given case. "

Inthejudgement reported in 2008 (2) Supreme Court Cases (L & S) 298 Their Lordship of the Hon'ble Suprerme Court held the following:---

"A. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Sec . 11A- Discretion available to Labour Court-Law laid down in Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India (P) Ltd. case (1973 ) 1 SCC 813- Explained and further held, must be exercised judiciously and with restraint- Labour Court ought not substitute its own view merely because two views are possible on the basis ofevidence on record-However , Labour Court can examine aspect of proportionality-Labour Court concluding that domestic enquiry was conducted in accordance with principles of natural justice and findings in the enquiry report were not perverse, yet it interfering with the managment decision and holding that no charge was established against workmen-No fresh evidence as introduced by either side before Labour Court-Held, Labour Court's interference not warranted-Analogy of lawlaid down on Civil Procedure Code , S .. 96 , also invoked/Civil Procedure Code , 1908-S . 96- Adminsitrative Law-Proportionality. "

Inthejudgement reported in2009 ( 1 ) Supreme Court Cases ( L & S) 126 their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Courtheld the following:-

"Departmental enquiry-Natural justice-Violation of-Whether results in automatic reinstatement- Departmental enquiry conducted against respondent found defective inasmuch as witnesses examined earlier were not produced for cross-examination- Disciplinary authority dismissed him from service onthe basis ofenquiry report which held the charges against respondent as proved-Following the law laid down in Hiran Mayee Bhattacharyya case (2002) 10 SCC 293 and R.S. Pandey Case, (2005) 8 SCC 264, held reinstatement could not be ordered on account ofthese infirmities in disciplinary proceedings- HighCourt ought to have directed fresh proceedings from the stage of alleged illegality, without ordering reinstatement-Respondent, however , in the meantime reaching superannuation age and therefore not interested in pursuing further remedy , rather interested in submitting a departmental representation for change of punishment from termination 3540GI/2009-17

to compulsory retirement- Liberty given to him to do so without expressing any opinion on this aspect."

Inthejudgement reported in 1 CLR Supreme Court , 1991 page 61 their Lorships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held the following :-

" 1. Constitution of India-Art . 31 (2)-After 42nd amendment-Disciplinary proceedings-Whether necessary to supply to delinquent copy of inquiry officer's report-Whether he is entitled, to make any representation against the same-Whether any change is brought about by 42nd amendment-Held thatsupply of a copy of the inquiry report along with recommendations , if any, in the matter of proposed punishment to be inflicated would be within the rules of natural justice and the delinquent would therefore be entitled to the supply of a copythereofand that the Forty Second Amendment has not brought about any change in this position."

9. Management has appointed the concerned lady vide appointment letter marked as Ext . W- 1 under Land Loser Scheme . She was not appointed on the basis of Matriculation or Secondary Certificate and enquiry has beenconductedby the managment as per Ext. M - 1 regarding Secondary School Certificate but no witness has been examined by the managment to prove the falsity and fabrication of the certificate submitted by the concerned workman. Above enquiry was held by the management ex parte.No publication regarding conducting of enquiry has been done in the newspaper so that the concerned ladymay appear and defend her case . Moreover, no second show cause notice was also given to the concerned lady before her dismissal on the contrary she was dismissed vide dismissal order marked as Ext . M - 17 . This attitude of themanagement clearly shows that they have violated law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 1 CLR page 61 , 1991. In this respect MW- 1 in course ofhis evidence stated in cross - examination that he had not condcuted the enquiry. He was simply management representative in the enquiry . He has also stated that no person of the Bihar Secondary Board was examined before the domestic enquiry, to prove the genuinity of the certificate . He has also stated neither any official of the school was examined during the domestic enquiry nor any admission register of the school was produced in the said enquiry proceeding. He has also stated and admitted that after enquiry and before dismissial no second show notice was issued to her. This evidence of the MW-1 shows that the enquiry which was conducted by the management was not fair and proper and moreover she was not given the second show cause notice to say regarding the enquiry proceeding and proposed dismissal order.

10. Inview ofthe facts , evidence , circumstances and citations of rulings discussed above I hold that the 6120

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

TheChiefGeneral Manager,

JWCL , Pench Area ,

management was not justified in dismissing the concerned lady from service . Accordingly following Award is rendered:--

....Management

PO Parasia, Chhindwara (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 26th day of August, 2009

1.TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide itsNotification No. L- 22012/361 /2007 - IR ( CM- II) dated 7-1-2008 has referred the following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal :-

"The action of the management of Bokaro Colliery ofM/ s . Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd. , P.O. Ghatotand Distt. Hazaribagh to dismiss the services of Smt . Meena Kumari Singh Clerk Grade III is not legal and not justified . Consequeltly she is entitled tobe reinstated to her original job from the date of her dismissial . She is also entitled full back wages from the date of her dismissal to the date of her reinstatement with consequential benefits ."

"Whetherthe action of the management ofM/ s . WCL indismissing Shri Bhaglal w.e.f. 15-9-03 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ? "

Management is directed to implement the Award withinthree months from the date of the publicaton of the same in the light of the observation made above .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 14 सितम्बर, 2009

2. The case of the workman in short is that he was Ex. Tub Loader , Thesgora Mine of Pench Area and was terminated on the ground ofhabitual absenteeism beyond sanction leave . Hence the reference .

3. The workman/Union appeared and filed an application alongwith terms and conditions of settlement . It is submitted that the dispute has been settled and the award be passed in terms of settlement .

का.आ. 2795.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , जबलपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 03/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

4.The non- applicant also appeared and Shri Abdul Hakeem , Personal Manager endorsed verbally that the parties have settled the dispute . He is also one of the signatory over the settlement.

[सं. एल-22012/361/2007 - आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 14th September , 2009

5. Perused the settlement . It appears that there is nothing illegality in the settlement and it is legal and proper. The following are the terms of settlement:-

(1) Shri Bhaglal S/ o Naukhey , Ex - Tub Loader , Thesgora Mine of Pench Area will be re-employed afresh as General Mazdoor in Cat- I for underground mine of Pathakhera Area and he will be paid initial basic of Cat- I (U.G. )

S.O. 2795.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 03/ 2008) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of WCL, and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 14-9-2009 .

(ii) Such re -employment will be subject to medical fitness so certified by the Company Doctor.

[No. L- 22012/361/2007 - IR ( CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM -LABOUR COURT , JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/03/2008

Presiding Officer : Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan

(ii) Shri Bhaglal S/ o Naukhey , Ex - Tub Loader , Thesgora Mine of Pench Area shall remain on probation for aperiod of one year from the date of joining and he has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year. In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management, his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

TheGeneral Secretary,

Sanyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh ( AITUC) ,

CRO Camp , Iklehra,

Distt. Chhindwara,

...Workman/Union

Chhindwara(MP)

Versus

(iv) Shri Bhaglal S/ o Naukhey , Ex- Tub Loader , Thesgora Mine of Pench Area shall be entitled only for continuity of service for the limited purpose of gratuity and this will be full and final settlement. Further, the benefit of continuity of 6121 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18, 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A.N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT , NAGPUR service will not be extended in such case where the person has been paid gratuity payment . This shall be full and final settlement and no further claim what so ever shall be made in future .

Case No. CGIT/NGP/ 61/ 2005

: Date: 28-08-2009

TheGeneral Secretary,

(v) The period from the date of termination till re- employment and joining on his duty will be treated as dies-non on the principle ofno work no pay.

Sanyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC), Central Office : CRO Camp, Ikalhara, Chhindwara (on behalf of Shri DeendayalS/ o Kundanlal )

Petitioner PartyNo. 1 (vi) Form- H settlement individually or through union, incorporatingthe above terms and conditions for entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the labour machinery.

Versus

The General Manager ,

Western Coalfield Limited, Pench Area , PO : Parasia ,

Distt. Chhindwara (M.P.)

Respondent PartyNo.2

AWARD

(vii) In case any dispute is pending before the CGIT , the re- employed person should withdraw the same from CGITby filing a copy of settlement for consent award. If any matter is pending before any other courts , the Union/ex - employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court. Shri Bhaglal S /o Naukhey CGIT case referred by Ministry of Labour to CGIT, Jabalpur but number was not allotted by Hon'ble Court .

Dated: 28thAugust, 2009

(viii) He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later stage.

costs . 6. TheAward is passed in terms of settlement without

7. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment asper rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence of dispute between the General Secretary , SanyuktaKoyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC), Chhindwara ( on behalf of Shri Deendayal S/o Kundanlal) (Party No. 1 ) and the General Manager , Western Coalfield Limited , Chhindwara (Party No. 2) referred the same for adjudication tothis Tribunal vide its letter No. L- 22012/345 /2004/IR (CM- II ) dated 20-07-2005 under clause (d) of sub Section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 [ 14 of 1947] with the following schedule.

नई दिल्ली , 14 सितम्बर, 2009

2. क्याप्रबंधतंत्र, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड लिमिटेड, पेंच एरिया पोस्ट परासिया जिला छिंदवाड़ा म.प्र . के प्रबंधन द्वारा श्री दीनदयाल आत्मज श्री कुन्दनलाल टो.न. 3017 डीपीआर/न्यूटन/ गणपति माइन को दिनांक 22-9-2001 के आदेश द्वारा सेवा समाप्ति के दण्ड से दंडित करने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहीं तो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ?

का. आ. 2796.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 61/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14-09-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -22012/345/2004- आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 14th September , 2009

3. The petitioner Shri Deendayal S/ o Kundanlal , was working as a Ex - DPR in Newton- Ganpati of Pench Area hasraised the dispute before the ALC and on failing ofthe conciliation proceeding , the Government had referred it to the CGIT. During the pendency of the dispute i.e. reference No. 61/2005 on 7-7-2009 both the parties settled in amicably outside the Court . They arrived at following certain conditions.

Terms and Conditions :

S.O. 2796.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 61 / 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court , Nagpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfield Limited , and their workman , received by the Central Government on 14-9-2009.

1. Shri Deen Dayal S/o Kundanlal , Ex - DPR, Newton- Ganapati ofPench Area will be re - employed afresh asGeneralMazdoor in Cat- I for underground mine ofPathakheraArea and he will be paid initial basic ofCat. I(UG).

[No. L- 22012/345/2004- IR (CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6122

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

2. Such re -employment will be subject to medical fitness so certified by the Company Doctor.

3. Shri Deen Dayal S/ o Kundanlal, Ex -DPR, Newton- Ganpati of Pench Area shall remain on probation for a period of one year from the date ofjoining and he has to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year . In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by themanagement, his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

4. Shri Deen Dayal S/o Kundanlal , Ex -DPR, Newton- Ganpati of Pench Area shall be entitled only for continuity of service for the limited purpose of gratuity and this will be a full and final settlement . Further , the benefit of continuity of service will not be extended in such case whether the person hasbeenpaid gratuity payment. This shall be full and final settlement and no further claim what so evershall be made in future .

5. The period from the date of termination till re- employment and joining on his duty will be treated asdies - rnon on the principle of no work no pay.

6. Form- H settlement individually or through union , incorporating the above terms and conditions for entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery .

7. In case any dispute is pending before the CGIT, the re -employed person should withdraw the same from CGITby filing a copy of settlement for consent award. If any matter is pending before any other courts, the union/ex -employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court. The case No. NGP/ 61/ 05 of Shri Deen Dayal S/ o Kundanlal is pending before the Hon'ble Court ofNagpur.

8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later stage:

The parties have produced the pursis before the Court on 25-8-2009 . They agreed it before the Court and requested for the Award in that terms . I accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it . Consequently, there remained no dispute due to the compromise .Hence , this no dispute Award.

Date: 28-08-2009

A.N. YADAV, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2797.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)) के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में लेबर कोर्ट, कोल्हापुर के पंचाट को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं.एल-40012/40/2003- आई. आर ( डी.यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 15th September , 2009 S.O. 2797. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Labour Court, Kolhapur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on15-9-2009 .

[No. L-40012/40/2003 -IR (DU)]

SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI M.B. DATYE, PRESIDING OFFICER , FIRST LABOUR COURT, KOLHAPUR Reference I.D.A. No. 57/2003

Sub -Divisional Engineer ,

Satara, Dist. Satara

Co-Axial Maintenance Unit, Atpresent Microwave Maintenance ofBharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , First Party

Versus

Shri Raju Bajirao Mane ,

R/ o 546 , Karanje Peth ,

Budh Vihar, Karanje - Tarf Satara,

Tal . Dist. Satara

Second Party Coram: Shri M.B. Datye , Presiding Officer Appearances:

Shri R.L. Chavan:

Advocate for First party .

Shri P.B. Dakave :

Advocate for Second Party

AWARD

Dated: 14-5-2009

Ministry of Labour and Employment , Government of India sent this reference to this Court . It said that "Whether the act of terminating Shri Raju B. Mane who was continuously working with Co - axial Maintenance Unit [Which is at present Microwave Maintenance (Powai Naka Unit) of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Satara) during 1st December, 1992 to 30th November , 1997 as Sweeper , without notice and compensation, is legal and valid? To what reliefs is he entitled? " After the reference was received , notices were sent to both the parties . The second party filed his Statement of Claim at Exh . U-4 . The first party submitted its written statement at Exh . C- 18 . Second party filed his affidavit of evidence at Exh . U -24 . First party did not conduct his cross - examination . My learned predecessor passed an award that the first party should pay [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

compensation Rs . 25,000 to the second party. Against that award, the first party filed a Writ Petition. Hon'ble High Court at Bombay by its order dated 29th September 2008 , held that the reference be restored . First party was allowed to file its written statement and the reference was asked to be decided in six months .

2. The second party in his statement of claim said thathe is a workman of the first party. He was working with the first party as Sweeper from 1990 to 1997. On 1st December , 1997 Shri Kulkarni , Sub- Divisional Engineer of the first party orally terminated him . Before that, notice , notice pay and compensation was not paid to him . There is breach of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act .

3. Second party further said that on 1st December , 1990 Sub - Divisional Engineer Shri Kodilkar had appointed him. He was paying a meager salary ofRs . 450 per month. He was getting his signatures on blank vouchers . His duty hours were 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. He was removing grass from the open space. He was cleaning the office , the quarters , machinery, lockers , toilets and water tanks . He had served for more than 240 days .

4. After termination, second party at first applied to Labour Enforcement Officer , Central at Sangli . First party did not file its reply. Then Labour Officer made over that matter to Assistant Labour Commissioner Central , Pune . Settlement was not arrived at. First party has illegally terminated him. He should be reinstated permanently as Sweeper Kamagar . He should be held to be continuously in service for seven years i.e. during 1st December, 1990 to 30th November , 1997. He also says that the back- wages should be paid to him.

5.The first party filed written statement at Exh . C - 18 and denied the contentions raised in the statement of claim . Second party has not served for 240 days continuously in one year, so he has no locus - standi to make the reference . Second partywas working temporarily in exigencies . The said post is not sanctioned vacant post on the establishment of the first party. So , the second party can not seek back door entry. It also said that second party should prove that he was appointed in 1990 and he was orally terminated on 30th November , 1997. Sub -Divisional Engineer of the first party does not a right to recruit . Appointment of the second party came to an end at the respective time . Reference is not tenable . It should be rejected, is the prayer of the first party.

6. From the statement ofclaim and written statement my learned predecessor framed following issues at Exh . 0-7. Findings to them with reasons are as under:

ISSUES

1. Whether second party proves that during 1st December, 1992 to 30th November , 1997, he was appointed by Co - axial Maintenance Unit which is now known as B.S.N.L. Microwave Satara ?

6123 2.Whether second party proves that the order of his termination is illegal and bad?

3. Is second party entitled for reinstatement with continuityof service and full backwages?

4. What award?

FINDINGS

1. No.

2. No.

3. No.

4.As per final order .

REASONS

Issue No. 1 :

7. Secondparty filed his affidavit ofevidence at Exh. U-24. It reads that Shri Kodilkar Saheb of the first party appointed him on 1st December , 1990 and he worked till 30th November, 1997. He was paid a meager salary of Rs . 450/- . Shri Kodilkar got his signatures on blank vouchers . Separate receipts or pay- slips were not given to him, is his say. He also held that Shri Kodilkar Saheb used to keep a note of his attendance . On 1st December , 1997 Sub-Divisional Engineer Shri Kulkarni of the first party told him that he should not attend duty from that day. He was orally terminated was his further say. In the cross- examination he denied that he had not applied in writing for a job. But he admitted that he cannot produce such application .He admitted that because he had not applied to the first party, he does not have a copy ofit. He admitted that his name was not recommended by the Employment Exchange . He denied that his wages were paid daily. Shri Aniruddha Kalyanrao Kulkarni , Divisional Engineer ofthe first party, in his affidavit Exh . C -28 said that the second partyhad not continuously served for 240 days .

8. Second party made an application Exh . U- 19 and prayed that first party should be asked to produce the muster roll , wage register , vouchers , pay - sheet and the bills ofpayment for the period 1st December , 1990 to 30th November , 1997. The first party gave its reply at Exh . C - 20 that the second party was appointed for exigencies . He was paid on vouchers . Separate muster was not maintained. So, the record is not available . I passed order on that application and asked the first party to produce the concerned record . The first party at Exh . C- 22 and C- 30 submitted the copy ofattendance of temporary labours for theperiodJanuary , 1991 to May 1995, as well as the copies ofthe work orders for the period 31st December, 1990to. 1st June , 1995. They do not show the name of the second party.

9. Second party filed a certificate dated 17th February, 1995, issued by Sub-Divisional Engineer . It reads that Shri Raju Bajirao Mane 546 , Karanje Peth, Satara , 6124

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] worked in the Co - axial building , temporarily for some time in the last year . His work and attendance was good. The Telecome District Manager , Satara in his letter dated 25thFebruary, 1997 to the second party said that he has temporarilyworked in Co -axial department as Sweeper.

be drawn against first party because it did not file documents. He relied on M/ s . Z.F. Steering Gears ( India) Vs. Shri Ramchandra S. Tapkir , 2006 (5 ) All M.R. 241 (Bombay High Court). In that case adverse inference was drawn against the first party because it did not produce document to show that the second party was in service even after his termination.

14. In the present case the first party right from the beginning has been saying that the second party was not in continuous service . Its say at Exh . C-20 is the same. Still ithas submitted documents at Exh . C- 22 and C- 30 . So there is no need to draw any adverse inference against it.

10. As per the certificate issued by the first party, the second party was temporarily working for some time in the previous year of 1995. Second party does not have any evidence to show that he was continuously working during 1st December, 1990 to 30th November, 1997. In Shri Navnath Maruti Chavan Vs. Conservator of Forest, 2006(4) All M.R. (N.O.C.)( Bombay High Court) . It is said that the aspect of regularizing the services of employees has no concern with working for 240 days . In M.R. Yellatti Vs. Assistant Executive Engineer, 2006 II I.R. Zarkhand 1-439 ( Supreme Court) . It is said by the Lordships that the burden of proving that the workman has worked for 240 days is onhim. In that case, A.A. Engineering had certified thatthe workmen had worked during 24-11-88 to 20-06-94. Further record was not produced.

11. Inthe present case the certificate in favour ofthe second party said that he worked for some time in the year prior to 1995. The record that was available is filed . Second party does not have any evidence except his words and affidavit to show that he worked for 240 days in twelve months preceding 30th November , 1997.

15. Second party informed the Collector, District Manager Telecom and District Social Officer that during 1stDecember, 1990 to 1st December , 1997 he was working with the first party. He does not have any evidence to prove the same . Second party admits that he was a daily wager. That is why he was asking for permanency and he waswritingtodifferent officers except the first party. Second partydoes not have evidence to show that he was working withthe first party from 1992 to 1997. His affidavit can not prove that fact . Except the certificate issued by Shri Kodilkar that he was working for some time in the previous year of 1995 , he has no document. He does not have letter of appointment, salary slip or a single document to show that he was on such duty. So , it is not proved that he was working with the first party from 1st December , 1992 to 30thNovember , 1997. I answer the first issue in negative .

Issue No. 2 :

16. Second party does not have any evidence to show thathe was working with the first party for more than 240 days before 30th November, 1997. First party is a GovernmentDepartment . In Secretary State of Karnataka &others Vs. Umadevi and others , 2006 ( II) C.L.R. Page 261 (Supreme Court) . It is said that Government Departments appoint workmen for temporary jobs . Merely because they serve for more than 240 days , they do not get a right to the post. So because the second party worked for some timewith the first party it can not get a right to the post . For the same reason because the first party did not follow the provision of Section 25 F i.e. giving notice , notice pay and compensation , the termination of the second party will not become illegal . So , I answer this issue in negative.

12. First party relied on Branch Manager (M.P. ) Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. S.C. Pandye , 2006( 1 ) C.L.R. 1066 (Supreme Court) . In that case the respondent was appointed temporarily for some time . It is said that he would not get the benefit of regularization of his job for the only reason thathe had worked for 240 days . In Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Raptkos Brett, 2006 ( 1 ) C.L.R. 312 (BombayHigh Court) . It is said that because the workmen had notworked for 240 days in a year the period for which they were not in job could not be added to it. In Chief Engineer (Construction) Vs. Keshavrao ( Deceased) 2005 L.L.R. (446 ) ( Supreme Court ) it is said that the burden of proving that the workman had worked for 240 days in 12 months preceding date of termination , is on him. In Bajaj AutoLtd. Aakurdi, Pune Vs. Shri Ashok Dnyanoba Dhumal andothers 2006 (1 ) C.L.R. 441 (Bombay High Court) . It is said that the weekly offs should not be added to the 207 days forwhich the workman had worked.

Issue Nos . 3 and 4 :

13. From the whole oral and documentary evidence as well as the decisions cited by both parties , it is seen that the second party does not have any evidence except his words, to show that he worked with the first party from 1st December , 1992 to 30th November, 1997. As said above, the certificate issued by Shri Kodilkar mentions that the second party was working with the first party for some time . But there is no evidence to show that he was continuously working with the first party . Advocate Shri Dakave for the second party argued that adverse inference

17. Second party did serve the first party on daily wages. He cannot get a right to the post. It is not possible to ask the first party to reinstate him and pay the back- wages. First party does not say that second party left the job . It said that the second party was not in continuous service . He was appointed as per exigencies . So, the decision in G.K. Medhekar Vs. Zenith Safe Manufacturing Co. , 1996 (I) C.L.R. Page No. 172 (Bombay High Court ) can not help the second party . Because the second party did [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

6125

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

not succeed in proving his case, it is not possible to grant any relief to him. I answer the third issue in negative and rejectthe reference with following order.

ORDER

Reference is rejected

No order as to costs .

Award be published.

M.B. DATYE, Presiding Officer Place:Kolhapur

Date 14-5-2009

नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2798.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार केन्टोन्मेन्ट बोर्ड के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 232/99 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-09-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-13012/9/99- आई. आर. ( डी.यू. ) ] / सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 15th September , 2009 S.O. 2798.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 232/ 99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on15-9-2009 .

[No. L- 13012/9 /99 - IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT - 1, CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 232/99

Sh. Om Parkash, S/o Sh. Rounki Ram,

V.P.O.: Saha, Distt. Ambala,

Applicant (Haryana)-134003

Versus

TheExecutiveOfficer ,

Cantonment Board, Ambala Cantt.

Appearances:

In person

Forthe Workman :

Sh. Dharmendar

Forthe Management :

AWARD

Passed on: 3-9-09

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 13012 / 9/99/IR(DU) , dated 26-10-1999 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act ( the Act in Short) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the Executive Officer , CantonmentBoard, Ambala Cantt. in terminating the services of Sh . Om Parkash S/o Sh . Rounki Ram by accepting his resignation w.e.f. 8-11-96 is just & legal ? If not to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"

After receiving this reference , both of the parties were summoned. They filed their respective pleadings . On perusal ofthepleadings of the parties , it is evidently clear that main issue before this Tribunal for adjudication is whether the workman , Sh . Om Parkash withdrew his resignation letter dated 29-3-1996 before its acceptance on 8-11-1996. It is the contention of the workman that he withdrew his resignation on 29-7-1996 before the same was accepted by the management of Cantonment Board.

Bothoftheparties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence. Sh . Om Parkash filed his affidavit and he was also examined by learned counsel of the management on 20-11-2006. On the other hand Sh. Subhash Chand filedhis affidavit for the management of Cantonment Board and he was accordingly examined as MW1 on 27-5-09.

Parties were heard at length.

Along with the affidavit the witness of the management has also filed and proved the letter written by the workmanto Executive Officer ofthe Cantonment Board on 29-3-1996. The management has also filed an office letter dated 11-11-1996 No. E4/96 , written to the workman by Executive Officer Ambala informing him about the acceptance of his resignation letter dated 29-3-96 on 8-11-96. The management has also filed a letter written by the workman to Executive Officer regarding the payment of amount due on account of accepting his resignation letter on8-11-96 .

Onthe other hand the workman has filed two letters dated 29-3-96 and 29-7-96 . Letter dated 29-3-96 which is marked Ex . W2 is not the same as Ex . M1 filed by the management. Both of the letters bears the same date 29-3-96. Contents ofthe letters are different . Ex. M1 which

.. Respondent

(Haryana)-133001 6126

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

अधिकरण नं.- I , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 39/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/190/99- आई आर ( डीयू) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्कअधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 15th September, 2009

S.O. 2799.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 39/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of C.P.W.D. , Karnal and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2009.

[No. L-42012/ 190/99- IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

hasbeen filedby the management dated 29-3-96 is admitted by the workman . The workman in his cross - examination admits that he wrote the resignation letter dated 29-3-96 which is filedby the management as MW1 . The letter dated 29-3-96 filed by the workman is altogether different. Moreover, workman has also filed letter dated 29-7-96 writtento Executive Officer regarding withdrawal ofhis resignation dated 29-3-96 . Both of these documents have beendenied by the management. Letter W2 dated 29-3-96 which the workman claims to move to the management for resignation is not genuine . However , as admitted by the workmanMI is the letter which was moved by the workman to the management regarding the resignation from the services . Thus , letters W2 and W3 filed by the workman seems tobe written in the same sequence at the same time. It is the photocopy of the original and management has denied to receive any letter dated 29-7-96 . The workman has filed to prove the genuineness of letter W2 dated 29-3-96. It is true that workman has moved a letter dated 29-3-96 but it is not W2 . In fact , it is M1 which was moved bythe workman regarding the resignation from the services . Accordingly , both of the letters moved by the workman cannot be relied upon as are not genuine .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH Case I.D. No. 39/2000 Smt. Lalita W/ o Shri Rajesh Narang ,

E - 25 , Subhash Gate ,

Karnal- 132001

Applicant

Versus

It is also the contention of the management that workman also filed a letter M3 regarding the payment of wages on account of the acceptance of his resignation letter on 8-11-96. This letter was moved by the workman on 14-1-97 . The contents of this letter are also admitted to the workman. On perusal of this letter , it is evidently clear thatthere is not a single word regarding the withdrawal of resignation letter dated 29-3-96 . This fact also proves that workman has never withdrawn his resignation letter dated 29-3-96 on 29-7-96.

The Executive Engineer , Kamal Central Divison , Central Public Works Department , Karnal- 132001

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Sri R.P. Rana

Forthe Workman

: SriG.S. Bal

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on : 3-9-09

The resignation letter dated 29-3-96 was accepted by the management on 8-11-96 . Before its acceptance the workman had not withdrawn the same . As soon as the order dated 8-11-96 was conveyed to the workman on 11-11-96 , it ceases the relationship of employer and employee between the workman and the management of Cantonment Board. From 11-11-96 the workman was not the employee of the management of Cantonment Board and there was no question of retrenchment by the management because the workman has voluntarily resigned from the services . The workman is not, accordingly, entitled for any relief. Let the Central Government be approached for publication of award , and thereafter , file be consigned.

Government of India vide notification No. L- 42012 / 190/99 - IR ( DU) dated 27-1-2000 , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication to ths Tribunal :

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of C.P.W.D. , Karnal in terminating the services of Smt . Lalita, Clerk- cum - Typist w.e. f. 26-9-97 is legal and justified ? If not , to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

का. आ. 2799.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सी.पी. डब्ल्यू.डी. , करनाल के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक

Afterreceiving the reference , parties were afforded the opportunity for filing their respective pleadings . On [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

6127

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

perusal of the pleadings of the parties , it is evident that main question for adjudication before this Tribunal is regarding the employer- employee relationship between the workman and the management of C.P.W.D. It is the contention ofthe workman that she had directly worked as typist in C.P.W.D. , Electrical Division, Karnal and the work orders under which she is said to be worked are the paper arrangements . It is further contended by the workman that she was shown to worked through a contractor just to prevent her to exercise a lawful right likely to be accrued under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Actinshort) regarding her working as typist with C.P. W.D. The workman has pleaded her working on work orders and through contractors as unlawful labour practice .

On the other hand , the management of C.P.W.D. , Electrical Division, Karnal has challenged the contention ofthe workman stating that there is no employer- employee relationship between the workman and the respondent. It is further contended by the management that previously workmanworked on independent contract, and thereafter, she worked through the two different contractors as per the policy of the government .

All the relevant documents have been filed.

The workman, Smt . Lalita , filed her affidavit and was cross-examined as W.W. 1 by learned counsel for the management, whereas, the Executive Engineer , Shri M.L. Baggan, Electrical Division, Karnal C.P.W.D. filed his affidavit and was cross - examined by the learned counsel for the workman .

I have heard the parties at length and perused all the documents on record.

As stated earlier , the main issue before the Tribunal is whether there existed employer- employee relationship between the workman and the management of C.P.W.D. ? Theworkmanhas to prove this relationship by some reliable evidence. The employer- employee relationship between the workman and the management can be poved by the nature ofwork, mode ofpayment and administrative control of the management over the workman. On perusal of the entire materials on record , including the evidence adduced and filed by the parties , it is clear that there is no dispute onthe issue that workman , Smt. Lalita, worked in the office ofthe C.P.W.D. , Executive Engineer , Karnal , as typist from 7-4-92 to 25-9-97. Upto 31-10-93 she is said tobe worked on independent contract (work orders ) , whereas , from 1-11-93 , she worked through the two different contractors . The workman claims this arrangementas unlawful labour practice.

The management has filed all the relevant documents toprove the nature of work done by, and mode ofpayment made to the workman . There is a letter on record for inviting tenders for some typing work ofthe department. There are three tenders on record and the tender of the workman was 3540GI/2009-18

accepted being lowest one . After accepting the tender of the workman she was issued work order for a specificterm on 1-4-92 which was extended from time to time up to 31-10-93 . From 1-11-93 onwards she worked through two contractors namely M/s Laxmi Electrical Services , and thereafter, Matadin contractor . The management has also filed the permission to engage the contract labour for the nature of work in question . Thus , it is established that workmanworked upto 31-1-93 directly on contract (work orders) for a fixed term and on fixed wages . There is no iota of evidence that workman worked durng this period otherwise then as prescirbed in the terms and conditions ofthe work orders . She was paid wages as per the terms and conditions of the work orders and her service conditions were also governed as per the contents of this contract . As per the clause of contract (work order) , it was extendable on consent of parties , and accordingly , was extended fromtime to time . On expiry of the last term ofthe extending contract , the workman cease to have any relationship with the management of C.P.W.D. From 1-11-93 she worked through two different contractors and as per the evidence adduced by the management she was paid wages by the contractor and not by the management of C.P.W.D. There is no iota of evidence adduced/ filed by the wokman toprove that she has not voluntarily accepted the contract or worked through two contractors . The workman hastermed this practice as unlawful labour practice. I am unable to accept tis contenton of the wokman because if her contention is accepted it will frustrate all the rules and regulations of the department regarding appointment against the regular vacancy . An appointment can be made through a legal process mentioned in the rules . No one can be permitted to bye pass the rules . If such appointment is considered to be a legal appointment, it will certainly allow the organization to bye pass the lawful method of appointment.

Forall purposes whether the nature of work, payment ofwages and administrative control over the workman there was no master -servant relationship between the workman and the management of C.P.W.D. The workman received the wages as settled in the contract upto 31-10-93 and thereafter , w.e.f. 1-11-93 through the contractor . She worked the same nature of work which was settled in a contract (workorder) and after 1-11-93 for which she was provided with by the contractors to the management . Thus , for all puposes there was no employer - employee relationship between the management of respondent and the workman .

As stated earlier, there is no iota of evidence to prove any fact ofunlawful labour practice . If regular appointments are not possible , the work can be carried out as per the policy on contract basis or through contractor on outsourcing . Under such circumstances , such engagement cannot create any relationship of master and servant and workman has no lien on the work. The workman is not accordingly, entitled for any relief. Let Central Government 6128

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 ; 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] be informed for publication of award, and thereafter, file be consigned.

to as theAct) , referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication tothis Tribunal .

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2009

"Whether the action of the management of B.B.M.Β. interminating the services ofSh . Gurdial Singh w.e.f. March , 1993 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the wokman is entitled ? "

का. आ. 2800.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 137/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/65/1998- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 15th September , 2009

As per the contention of the workman which is reflected from the statement of claim , he applied for 20 days earned leave w.e.f. 29-3-93 and due to the illness of his mother at Delhi he had to stay at Delhi for a longer period and could not return till 20-10-94. He approached the sub- divisional officer of the B.B.M.B. and came to know that his services have been terminated by the B.Β.Μ.Β. without complying with the provisions of the Act . No enquiry was conducted and no notice, one month wages in lieu ofnotice or retrenchment compensation was paid to him which make his termination illegal. On the basis of above mentioned facts , the workman has prayed for an order for setting aside the termination order and re- instatement of his services with full back- wages and other consequential relief.

S.O. 2800.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 137/ 1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-9-2009.

[No. L-23012/65/98 - IR (CM - II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 137/99

Sh . Gurdial Singh C/ o R.K. Singh Parmar , H. No. 211 - L, Barari ,

PO, Pratap Nagar , Nangal Dam

Distt. Ropar( PB) .

Applicant

Versus

The Chief Engineer ,

In its written statement , the management ofB.B.M.B raised preliminary objections that the reference is not maintainable . It was also contended by the management that industrial dispute was raised after 5 years of the order of termination. As per the contention of the management , theworkman applied for 20 days leave w.e.f. 29-3-93 , but onexpiry of leave he did notjoin the duties and applied for extension of leave for further 20 days by a telegam from Delhi . Even after expiry of that period, he did not resume hisduties. Vide letter No. 4952-54/PF dated 16-3-93 , he was asked to resume his duties within three days ofthe receipt ofthe said letter. Instead of making compliance of the said letter, the workman requested for extension of leave upto 31-8-93 along with medical certificate of private medical practitioner from Delhi . He was advised vide letter No. 8375- 77/PF dated 13-9-93 that the medical certificate from a private practitioner is not acceptable and the medical certificate from aGovernment Hospital at Delhi be provided . After it, the workman neither informed the management of B.B.M.B. nor joined his duties .

Bhakra Dam,

Nangal Township ,

Ropar(PB).

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman

: Sri R. K. Singh

For the Management : Sh . Bhagat Singh

AWARD

It is further contended by the management that Sh.Gurdial Singh was again advised from time to time vide registered letters No. 9894-95/PF dated 5-11-93 , letter No. 1936-37/PF dated 24-2-94, letter No. 3647-48 /PF dated 29-4-94 and letter No. 5460-61 /PF dated 5-7-94 to resume the duties, but in vain . All these letters have been received by him/his relatives as none has received back to the office ofB.B.M.B.

Passed on; 3-9-09

It is further contended by the management that the workman was given final chance to resume his duties vide letter No. 7331-37/PF dated 30-8-94, but he failed to resume the duties and accordingly, disciplinary action in compliance Government of India vide Notification No. L -23012/ 65/98 - IR ( CM - II) , dated 27-5-99 , exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , ( hereinafter referred 6129 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

of the letter dated 30-8-94 served to the workman were taken and his services were terminated and his name was struckofffromthe pay roles of the B.B.M.B.

It shows that during the period in question the workman obtained a passport and a business visa for Japan . It is true that the fact of visiting Japan is not proved , but in his evidence the workman has not denied it .

Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence . Oral evidence was recorded . Management also preferred to file documentary evidence as Annexure A, Annexure G , and thereafter M2 toM35 .

Once the management has proved before this Tribunal by cogent evidence that the workman obtained a lawful passport to visit foreign country and also obtained a business visa from Embassy of Japan , it is on the workman to prove that in spite of obtaining visa , he has not visited the country for which he obtained visa . In entire evidence even the workman has not denied that he had not visited Japan.

Ihave heard learned counsel of both the parties at length. It is the only contention of the learned counsel for the workman that in the case of absent of a permanent employee inquiry is necessary. No inquiry was conducted in this case and the services of the workman were terminated in violation of principle of natural justice because no right to hearing was afforded. On the other hand learned legal advisor of the management contended and argued that number of letters were written to the workman, but he did not comply with any of the letters . When the last order was sent to the workman an inquiry was also conducted and it came to the notice of the management that during the period of his unauthorized absence he visited Japan without permission. A letter of the Embassy of Japan is on record which proves that one man business visa was given to the workman .

In his statement of claim and the affidavit he has narrated the cause of absence as illness of his mother , whereas, when he applied for extension of leave he submitted a medical certificate for his own illness . It is a contradictory statement given by the workman. On perusal ofthe statement of claim and affidavit filed by the workman , itis also evident that the main contention and argument of the workman is that even for unauthorized absence an inquiry should have been conducted and opportunity of being heard should have been given to the workman . It was not done and it was violation of the right of principle ofnatural justice of the workman .

Principle ofnatural justice is not an unending China Wall and unrulling horse . On perusal of the record , it cannot be said that opportunity of being heard was not given to the workman. Five letters were written to the workman which were not answered nor was the cause of unauthorized absent shown . Even after receiving letters , at the address givenby the workman in the office of management , the workman failedto join the duties . On remaining unauthorized absence the disciplinary authority himself tried to know the truth about the workman to given him the right to hearing and it is well proved before this Tribunal that the workman has visited Japan during the period in question unauthorizely without permission prescribed under the rules. Thus, opportunity of being heard was given to the workman and he failed to avail that opportunity . By unauthorized visit of Japan, he himself frustrate the efforts of disciplinary authority to conduct a fair inquiry . The workman cannot be permitted to take the benefit for his ownmistake .

Onperusal ofthe material on record, it is evident that workman applied for 20 days earned leave which were sanctioned. In spite for joining the duties , he sent a telegram for extension of leave for further 20 days on the ground of his illness . He also sent a medical certificate by a Delhi based Doctor . The management took congnizance of his leave extension application and asked him to send a medical certificate of Government hospital based at Delhi . The workman neither replied the letter nor sent a medical certificate of a Government hospital based at Delhi . Moreover, the workman also failed to resume his duties . Thereafter, four letters were written to the workman to resume his duties but he failed to show the cause ofabsence and to resume duties . On failure ofresuming duties by the workman and showing the cause of unauthorized absence , hewas given a final notice on 30-8-94 asking him tojointhe duties within 10 days otherwise disciplinary action shall betaken against him . Before taking the disciplinary action, efforts were made by the disciplinary authority to know the truth about the workman , and it came to the notice of disciplinary authority that during the period in question he visited Japan onbusiness visa. The letter from the Embassy Japan is on record which proves that one man business visa was issued to the workman . This fact is admitted by the workman in his cross - examination dated 23-7-93 . I am mentioning few lines from the statement of the workman recorded on 23-7-03 .

Moreover , person who has committed such misconduct for visiting a foreign nation without permission and without even informing the management , he cannot claim the violation of principle of natural justice. The principleofnatural justice cannot create protective embargo over the unauthorized act of the workman . Thus , there is no violation of any right of principle of natural justice and theworkman was rightly terminated from the service . The reference is accordingly answered. Let Central Government approached for publication of award , and thereafter , file bę consigned.

G.K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer "It is correct that passport was issued to me from the Chandigarh office . It is also correct that visa was given to me on my application by Japan Embassy, my passport is now missing. " 6130

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2009

referredthe following industrial dispute for adjudicationto thisTribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of B.B.M.B. in not reemploying the retrenched workman Sh. Gurbachan Singh ( who was retrenched in 1980) , in 1993 when fresh recruitments were made in the establishment is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled and from which date" .

का. आ. 2801.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं बी.बी.एम.बी. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 1, चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 149/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-23012/3/ 1996- आई आर ( सी- II ) ]

अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 15th September , 2009

The nature of this reference makes it clear that retrenchment of the workman in 1980 is not the subject matter ofdispute between the parties . I have to answer the reference as referred by the Central Government. Thus , the plea takenbythe workman that his retrenchment was illegal isnot tobe considered. In the reference , Central Government has accepted the plea of the management that workman was retrenched in the year 1980. The dispute is whether after retrenchment of his services , new hands/juniors to theworkman were appointed in violation ofSection 25 (H) ofthe Act ?

S.O. 2801.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 149/ 1997) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of BBMB and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 15-9-2009 .

[No. L- 23012/3 /1996- IR (C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Moreover , the workman also filed a petition under Section 33 ( C) (2 ) of the Act , for commutation of his retrenchment compensation and some other amount of money. The petition has been allowed by this Tribunal and the retrenchment compensation which was found sort has been ordered to be paid to the workman . Thus , as stated earlier, the nature of retrenchment of the workman is not open to make a subject matter of the reference .

BEFORE SHRI GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT - 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 149/97

The only issueto answer in this reference is whether the management of B.B.M.B. has violated the right of the workman to get the work of similar nature on priority after his termination when new hands were recruited ?

Sh. Gurbachan Singh C/ o R.K. Singh Parmar ,

Organizing Secretary, Punjab INTUC, Qtr. No. 35 -G,

Nangal Township,

Distt. Ropar (PB)

.Applicant

Versus

The ChiefEngineer (Generation) , Β.Β.Μ.Β.,

Nangal Township ,

Distt. Ropar (PB)

.Respondent

It is the contention of the workman that so many workers were appointed after his termination, even his juniors retained in service and he was not given the occasion to work after retrenchment. The management has opposed this plea on the contention that at the relevant time no seniority was maintained . Thus , there was no question for appointment of anyjunior to the workman . It was also contended by the management that retrenche from B.C.B. were appointed in B.B.M.B. as per the policy of B.B.M.B. Workman was not the retrench of B.C.B. , hence , there was no violation of any right of the workman .

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman

: Sri R.K. Singh

Forthe Management

Sh. Rajinder Singh

AWARD

Passed on : 2-9-09

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 23012/ 3/96- IR( C- II) , dated 24-7-97 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act , ( The Act in short ) ,

Parties were afforded the opportunity for adducing evidence. Oral evidence ofboth of the parties was recorded. Management of B.B.M.B. also preferred to file the documentary evidence which includes the policy of B.B.M.B. to make appointment of B.C.B. retrenche to B.B.M.B. The statement of working days has also been filed. It is not the issue before this Tribunal, whether the workmanhas completed 240 days of work in the preceding year from the date ofhis termination ? As stated earlier , the issue is whether management is guilty of voilating the provisions of Section 25 ( H) of the Act ? Workman in his [भाग II-खंड 3 (ii) ]

6131

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

affidavit and cross - examination has categorically stated the names of his juniors and fresh appointees , appointed after the termination of the services of the workman. In its affidavit the management has not contended, even has not mentioned a single word except to refer that at the relevant time there was no policy for maintaining the seniority list. The management cannot be permitted to violate the provisions ofthe Act just on the ground that at the relevant time it was not bound to maintain the seniority list . Maintaining seniority list is an administrative act of the management and if the workman is able to prove that his juniorswere appointed after his retrenchment, it will amount to the violation ofSection 25(H) of the Act . The provisions of the Act cannot be put to the dead letter just on the ground that management , at the relevant time, was not maintaining the seniority list.

Moreover , the workman in his affidavit has also mentioned the names ofpersons who were recruited freshly by the management after his termination. Not a single word wasasked in cross - examination of the workman, regarding such appointments . Thus , commutative effect of oral and documentary evidence of the parties is that junior to the workman and new recruitments were made by the management of B.B.M.B. after termination of the services of the workman . It is admitted by the management that after the retrenchment of the workman , he was not afforded anyopportunity to work , whereas , work was available with the management. Thus , the management is guilty of violating the provisions of Section 25 (H) of the Act .

The consequences of such violation will be that if the work is available with the management, the same should be directed to re- instate the services of the workman . It is undisputed that the work is still available with the management. Accordingly , the management is directed to re- instate the services of the workman on the same work , he was working at the time of his retrenchment, within one month from the publication of the award. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that workman has not worked for a long time , I am of the view, that he will not be entitled for the back-wages . The reference is answered accordingly. Let Central Government be approached for publication of the award , and thereafter , filebe consigned.

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2802,- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 21/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -22012/375/1999- आई. आर. ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 15th September, 2009 .

S.O. 2802. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 21 / 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman, which was received bythe Central Government on 15-9-2009 .

[No. L- 22012/375/ 1999- IR (C- II )] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer.

Reference No. 21 of 2000

PARTIES:

Industrial Dispute between Management of Bejdih Colliery of ECL, Sodepur Sunderchak , Burdwan .

Versus

Thier Workman.

REPRESENTATIVES :

P.K. Goswami , Advocate

For the Management For the Union (Workman) : R.K. Tripathi , Chief Org . Secretary, K.M.C. STATE : WEST BENGAL, INDUSTRY: Coal

Dated the 3-6-2009

AWARD

In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- Section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22012 / 375/1999 - IR (C - II) dated 29-2-2000 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bejdih Colliery of ECL in denying employment to the dependents of Sh. Ramnath Gareri and 4 others is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"

2. On the receipt ofthe Order No. L- 22012/375/1999- IR(C-II ) dated 29-2-2000 of the above mentioned reference from theGovt . of India , Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 21 of 2000 6132

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] wasregistered on 13-3-2000 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statement along with the relevant documents and a list of witness in support of their claims . In pursuancesuance ofthe said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned .

3. The fact that entailed the present Industrial Dispute (I.D.) is that the workman Ramnath Gareri and nine others which include the five workmen of the present reference opted for voluntary retirement in response to a scheme U.G. Loader voluntary retirement scheme . They were medically examined and found unfit by the Company's MedicalBoard on 4-3-1989 . Out of them five employees were granted the benefit and their dependants were given employment where as the present workman were deprived ofthe same and hence the dispute.

allowed to elapse till the period of retirement ofthe workmen bythe management deliberately or negligently whatever it mightbut had there been a decision on the matter in time it would not have deprived the workmen their lawful claims . Completion of full terms in service by the workman do not disentitlethem from their right that accrued in their service period. Had their case been attended in all promptitude by the management things would have been otherwise .Hence , the stand taken by the management that the workmen are not entitled for the relief of employment of theirdependent onground of the workmen completed 60 years of full terms service is not tenable . That apart discrimination made is found glaringly as the five other workmen with same eligibility and circumstances have been offered employment for their dependants . In such circumstance it is held that the action of the management of Bejdih Colliery under M/ s . E.C. Ltd. in denying employment to the dependant of Sh. Ramanath Gareri and 4 others under reference is not legal and justified . The management is required to grant and extend the same benefits that has been granted to other five concerned workmen without any sort of discrimination . Hence it is order .

ORDER

4. The union alleged that there has been no valid reason for such discrimination. The union asserts that the matter was before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta and was taken up subsequently by the management and that the Dy . C.M.E./Agent , Bejdih - Methani Vide Note Sheet No. BM/C -6/5-B/ 1077 dated 23-7-1990 submitted the proposal to the HQ for approval but still workmen were not given the benefit.

Let an award be and same is passed as above . Copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour and Employment , Govt. of India, New Delhi .

MANORANJAN PATINAIK, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर , 2009

5. The stand of the management is that the workmen were never found unfit and that they have completed their full term of service upto sixty years of age and were superannuated . The benefit clause of 9.4.3 NCWC - IV is not applicable to them and that there has been no discrimination to deprive them of the benefit.

का. आ. 2803.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रके सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोलके पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 42/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/654/1997- आई आर( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 15th September , 2009

S.O. 2803. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 42/ 1998) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of ECL and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-09-2009.

6. On going through the records the evidence and upon hearing the Learned Advocate for the management and the Authorized Representative of the workman it is found that the present workman had applied for voluntary retirement under the scheme which is evident from Ext WE- 1 . The Dy. C.P.M. suggested for their medical examination by the Area Medical Board as back as 12-5-1989 . The Superintendent/Manager vide WE- 2 submitted details indicating service of notice of superannuation on four of the present workman. It is an admitted fact that there has been an understanding for holding medical examination of all the 10 persons even though they had crossed the 55 years . Thedelay was admittedly caused in sending proposal to the Head Quarter as the concern files were not traced as from Ext . WE-4 . It clearly showns about holding of Medical Examination of the concerned workmen and the delay caused by the lapses ofthe establishment . The wokman has not contributed to the same. It is the admitted fact that these workmen have not been found "Not fit for Loader's job" by the company's Medical Board on 4-3-89 . There is no doubt that time was

[No. L- 22012/ 654/ 1997- IR ( C- II ) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer 6133 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , ASANSOL

PRESENT:

SriManoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 42 of1998

PARTIES:

Industrial Dispute between Management of Kalipahari Colliery of M/s . ECL , Burdwan .

3. Shun of all details the case of the workman representedby the union is that the workman Biman Bihari Gandhi who worked as on Explosive Carrier was authorized by the Manager of concern colliery to work as Magazine Clerk inDamraunit of Kalipahari Area w.e.f. 22-1-1988 . For some period he was transferred to Ghusick Colliery and again he was brought back to Damra in 1997. He was authorizedtowork as Magazine clerk . Having the requisite qualification for the said post the workman applied for his absorption but he was illegally transferred to Ghusick Collierytoworkunderground as a Trammer/Explosive Carrier instead of regularizing him in the said post and hence the dispute.

Vs.

TheGeneral Secretary, West Bengal Khan Mazdoor Sangh,Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES :

For the Management

: Sri P. K. Goswami , Advocate .

: Sri N. Ganguly,

For the Union ( Workman)

Advocate.

4. The simple case of the management as per averment is that the workman holds substantive post as Explosive Carrier and was posted at Damra Unit as such as . The Damra Colliery was closed and there has been no production there w.e.f. 24-4-1997 and consequently , there was no requirement of Magazine Clerk. Further , maintaining that the worman has not worked continuously from 27-1-08 and alleging long delay in raising such claim , the management urged that the workman is not entitled to any relief.

Industry: Coal

State: West Bengal

Dated the 10th June , 2009

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause ( d) ofSub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L-22012/ 654/97- IR(C- II ) dated 14-08-1998 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action ofthe management of Kalipahari (R) Colliery ofECL in denying the difference ofwages ofMagazine Clerk to Sri Biman Bihari Gandhi , (appointed as Explosive Carrier) and also denying his regularization as Magazine Clerk and further transferring him as Underground Trammer to Ghusick Collieryare legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? י

Onreceipt the Order No. L- 22012 /654/ 97 - IR ( C - II )

dated 14-08-1998 of the above mentioned reference from the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 42 of98 wasregistered on 24-08-1998 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

5. On going through the pleadings , documents of the parties, evidence laid down and upon hearing both the sides it is found that the management has not refutedthe claim of the workman that he was deployed to work as Magazine Clerk. The letter Ext. W- 3 amply proves this fact . Itisfound from his evidence that due to such deployment the allowance available to workman underground was stopped but he was not granted the scale of pay for the post of clerk . This has also not been refuted by the management at all . His evidence that there is still vacancies in Musilia Colliery has not been countered by the management. The management has also not produced, despite direction, the required official documents like Transit slip ofMagazine, Store Trader slip , Ledger etc. in respect ofdeployment of the workman as Magazine clerk which would have of immense help to find the real position . Thepay slips filed by the workman showing non -payment ofunderground worker like Explosive Carrier go to support his claim and adverse inference can be drawn against management for not filing the official documents supposed tobe in their custody . The above facts and circumstances are indicative of unjustice caused to the workman. The claim of requisite qualification to hold the post ofclerk by the workman has not been challenged . The management by a passing remark and without any effort to substitute the fact has maintained that the workman has not continuouslybeen deployed as a magazine clerk and at the same time with holding the pertinent documents without sufficient reason affirm the claim of the workman. In such circumstances it can safely be held that the employer management is not at all justified in denying the workman thedifference ofwages of magazine clerk and regularisation 6134

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

APPEARANCES :

Forthe Workman

: Sh . Chandan Kumar, Advocate .

Forthe Management : Sh . Parmod Jain , Advocate.

AWARD

of the workman in that post . Also the transfer of the workman to any other colliery to work underground amounts to deprival his lawful claim to work as magazine clerk and such action does not appear to be justified .Hence workman is entitled to relief he has sought i.e. to be absorbed as a magazine clerk with all service benefit from the date of his deployment . Accordingly an award needs to be passed. Hence ordered

Passed on 2-9-2009

ORDER

Let an award as above be and same is passed. Send the copy of the award be sent to the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Govt . of India , NewDelhi .

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer

Government of India vide Notification No. L - 22012/ 29/98 /IR (CM - II) dated 22-12-1998 by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication of this Tribunal:

नई दिल्ली, 15 सितम्बर, 2009

"Whether the action of the management of Food CorporationofIndia, Haryana Region Chandigarh in not regularizing the services of 30 handling workers (list enclosed) isjust and legal ? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled and from what date ? " का. आ. 2804.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं एफ. सी. आई. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. 1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 23/1999 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 15-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-22012/29/1998- आई . आर. ( सी- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 15th September , 2009

S.O. 2804. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/ 1999) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation tothe management of FCI and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 15-09-2009.

[No. L- 22012/29/ 1998 - IR (C- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANANDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-1, CHANDIGARH

Case No. I.D. No. 23/1999

TheJoint Secretary, FCI Workers Union, Camp Office, 7901 , Ramnagar , Naibasti , Paharganj , New Delhi .

. Applicant

Versus

Respondent

Onperusal of the pleadings of the parties , it is evident that the main issue for adjudication before this Tribunal is whether all the 30. claimants are entitled for the benefits of Haryana Government notification dated 29-11-1985 and the settlement entered into between Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) and the Food Corporation of India Worker Union (hereinafter referredto as the Union) regarding their departmentalization , worked inModernRice Mill at Karnal and after closing of Modern Rice Mill in Shed No. 4 of the Food Storage Depot , Karnal ? On perusal of the pleadings of the workmen, their case, in nutshell , is that the Corporation engaged the workmen to work in different Depots of Karnal , for the purpose ofhandling, transportation, stacking , de- stacking etc.of foodgrains including sugar. All the workers worked for the said purposes formed the union. The union , since its formation in the year 1965 has been constantly fighting for the exploitation of the workmen by the Corporation and its contractors for the purpose of getting fair wages and human and just working conditions. Bulk of handling workers in the Corporation were initially engaged through contractors and working as contract labour. The Union fight for abolition of contract labour system . In compliance ofthe orders passed by the Hon'ble the Apex Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13508/83 filed by the Union.Government ofHaryana on the recommendations of a Committee constituted under Section 5 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act , 1970 abolishing the contract labour in Haryana vide Notification dated 29-11-1985 made under Section 10 ofthe Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, in 22 Food Storage Depots including Railheads of the Corporation in Haryana Region . Even after a long time the Food Corporation of India could not implement the notification of Government of Haryana dated 29-11-1985 and after the long battle an agreement TheAreaManager, Food Corporation of India, Karnal. (Haryana) 6135 [भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

was entered into between the Corporation and the Union on12-04-1991 . The benefits ofagreement dated 12-04-1991 weregivento the workers employed in Food Storage Depot, Karnal but itwas not extended to the workers employed in Modern RiceMill at Karnal , and after closure ofthis Mill in Shed No. 4. As per the contention of the workmen , the Corporation in conciliation proceedings accepted and admittedthe demand and prayer of the Union to extent the benefit of Agreement dated 12-04-1991 to the workers working in Modern Rice Mill , Karnal and after its closure in Shed No. 4. But the Corporation did not honor its commitment and request of the Union , hence, Union raised the Industrial Dispute and on account of failure of conciliationreport this reference .

TheCorporation appeared and contested the claim by filing written statement . Apart from taking preliminary objections that none of the workman has completed 240 daysofwork in any calendar year and there is no ermployer- employee relationship between the workers and the Corporationetc.,the Corporation contended that the benefit oftheagreement dated 12-04-1991 was intended to be given only to the workers working in Food Storage Depot and not in Modern Rice Mill . The Corporation, as per its contention , has rightly refused to extend the benefit of Agreement dated 12-04-1991 to the workers working on contract in Modern Rice Mill , Karnal , because Modern Rice Mill was the independent unit and entity than Food Storage Depot at Karnal. Head of the Department of both oftheunits namely; Food Storage Depot and ModernRice Mill were different officers , their working was different and they cannot claim parity with the workers working on contract with Food Storage Depot. The Corporation has further contended that the workers , worked in Food Storage Depotwereengaged in Shed No. 1 , 2 and 3 and after closure of the Modern Rice Mill the Shed No. 4 was used for the contract labour working with the Mill . The permanent staff ofModern Rice Mill was adjusted/shifted somewhere else and the contract labour cannot claim parity with the permanent staff.

this issue, this Tribunal has to see the language of the Notification issued by Government of Haryana regarding abolition ofcontract labour and the agreement executed and signed between the Corporation and the Union . On careful perusal of the notification , I am unable to find a single word ofdifferentiation by the Government of Haryana inprohibiting the contract labour working in Modern Rice Mill and Food Storage Depot, Karnal . As admittedby the Corporation , two units are different , but the part of Corporation. The Haryana Government , while issuing the notification for abolition of contract labour has not intended to make a difference in these two units for the purpose of abolition of contract labour . There is a plain Notification dated 29-11-1985 for abolition of contract labour in 22 Food Storage Depots including Railheads in the State ofHaryana . The name of Karnal found placed at serial No. 7. There is no mention about the Modern Rice Mill inthis notification. It is the principle of interpretation ofstatute that beneficial legislation has to be interpretated liberally. It is also the settled rule of interpretation that when the language of any enactment, rule or regulation is simple and plain and is capable of bearing one meaning only, then that one meaning has to be adopted by the Corporation or the adjudicatory authorities . It is in the case of two interpretations of any word or phrase that interpretation, which is for the benefit of deprived class , is to be adopted and taken to answer the meaning of a particular phrase. The question before this Tribunal , which israisedby the Corporation is that Modern Rice Mill is not included in the Food Storage Depot. The Corporation has tried to justify this contention on the grounds that in notification dated 29-11-1985 , there is no mention of the contract workers working with Modern Rice Mill . When interpretation of any notification is to be taken by the Tribunal , it has to be read in entirety. Aparticular clause or phrase should not be read in isolation . On perusal of entire notification , the intention of the Haryana Government is verywell reflected that it was for the purpose of giving a benefitto the workers who were working as contract labour in Karnal. The intention to make any difference between the contract workers working in Food Storage Depot and Modern Rice Mill is not reflected . As stated earlier , that beneficial legislation and scheme has to be interpreted liberally and should not go beyond the intention of legislature and scheme . Intention of the legislature, as stated earlier, is very much reflected that all the workers working withthe Corporation as contract labour in Karnal are prohibited under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. Thus, I am not inclined to accept the contention of the management that the benefit ofNotification of Haryana Government cannot go to the contract workers working in Modern Rice Mill .

Likewise , agreement entered into in between Union and the Corporation on 12-04-1991 , does not contained a single word for not extending the benefit of this agreement Parties were afforded opportunity for adducing and filing evidence . Oral evidence was recorded and all the documents, which are relevant for the adjudication for this reference , have been filedby the parties . Parties were heard atlength. I have also perused entire materials on record. So far as the preliminary objections are concerned , I am ofthe view that the objections are the matter of routine and have no nexus with the main issue , which is referred for adjudication of this Tribunal. The issue of Master and servant relationship has not to be adjudicated in this reference, but this Tribunal is obliged to answer the issue whether the Corporation has rightly rejected the claim of the workman for extension of the benefits of agreement dated 12-04-1991 to the contractual labour working in Modern RiceMill , Karnal at par with the contractual labour working in Food Storage Depot, Karnal ? For answering

3540GI/2009-19 6136

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

go back even to the position of pre Haryana Government Notification. Thus , after notification of the Haryana Government dated 29-11-1985 , and the agreement between theUnion and the Corporation dated 12-04-1991 , there was nooccasion for the Corporation to deny the benefit ofthis agreement regarding the departmentalization of labour with effect from 01-01-1991 . The plain reading ofthis agreement also shows that the benefits and facilities mentioned in this agreement were extended and given even to those Food Storage Depots , which were not included in the notification ofthe Haryana Government , meaning thereby , few Food Storage Depots in which the labour was not abolished by the appropriate Government , the benefit of the agreement was extended, whereas , for Karnal the contract labour was abolished and Corporation cannot justify itself by not extending this agreement to the contract labour working in Modern Rice Mill and after the closure ofthe Mill were engaged in Shed No. 4 .

to the workers working on contract in Modern Rice Mill. It isnot open for the Corporation to refuse the benefit ofthis agreement on the grounds that Modern Rice Mill is/was not part of the Food Storage Depot . On perusal of the entire materials on record , particularly the oral evidence adduced by the parties , I am of the view that the work of contract workers working in Food Storage Depot and working inModern Rice Mill has the close nexus . Moreover, as per the evidence given by the management, on closure ofModern Rice Mill , the contract labour working with the Modem Rice Mill was not terminated but provided with the work of Food Storage Depot in Shed No. 4. The Shed No.4 is a part and parcel of Food Storage Depot as Shed No. 1 , 2 and 3 and it cannot be stated that Shed No. 4 is attached with the premises of Modem Rice Mill . It is true that Food Storage Depot and Modern Rice Mill are independent units, but there working is so closed that Corporation was not justified to make a distinction between the contract labour working in two units and entities . It was not the intention of the agreement dated 12-04-1991 that the contract labour working with Modern Rice Mill shall be excluded from the benefit . At the cost ofrepetition, thisagreement has to be interpreted liberally and plain and liberal construction of this agreement dated 12-04-1991 itself speaks that contract workers working in Modern Rice Mill are also entitled for the benefit of this agreement .

Thus, on the basis of the discussion made in the bodyof this award , I am ofthe view that all the 30 workmen (Listenclosed) are entitled for the benefit of Notification dated 29-11-1985 and Agreement dated 12-04-1991 . Accordingly, the Corporation is directed to extend the benefitofdepartmentalization to all the 30 workmen with effect from 01-01-1991 within three months from the date of publication of this Award . The reference is answered accordingly. Let the Central Government be approached for publication of the award, and thereafter , the file be consigned to record room.

G. K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer .

This view ofthe Tribunal is further corroborated by a decision taken by the Manager of the Association in conciliation proceedings to extend the benefit of this agreement to the contract labour working in Modern Rice Mill, Karnal. There is no occasion for the management to

LIST OF WORKERS WORKING AT MODERN RICE MILL , KARNAL

Name ofWorkers

Father'sName

Sl . No.

Yearof

Appointment

(4)

(1) (2)

(3)

Sri Panchu Ram Paswan

1980

Sri Bunel Paswan

1980

2. Rambali Paswan

Sri Bilat Paswan

3. Sri Rashid Ali

1980

Sri Mohd. Ibrahim

1980

Sri Samali Ram

4. Sri Bhola Ram

1980

5. Sri Pramod Sahni

Sri Indradev Sahni

1980

6. Sri Mantun Sahni

Sri Ram Sagar Sahni

7. Sri Janardan Mahto

1980

Sri Bhonu Mahto

1980

8. Sri Rambahadur Mahto

Sri Dukhi Mahto

1980

9. Sri Sitaram Chouhan

Sri Raghunath Chouhan

10. Sri Shankar Chouhan

1980

Sri Rohan Chouhan 6137 [ भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

SriHari Mahto

1980

11. Sri Rajendar Mahto

1985

12. Sri Jatan Mahto

Sri Badiyun Mahto

1985

13. Sri Sulender Mahto

Sri BaleswarMahto

Sri Sahadev Chouhan

1985

14.

Sri Prasadi Chouhan

1985

15. Sri Devniti Paswan

Sri Ramsewak Paswan

1985

Sri Ramsewak Paswan

16. Sri Pappu Paswan

1985

Sri Laxmi Sahni

17. Sri Jayram Sahni

1985

Sri Shiv Dev

18 . Sri Deonandan Sahni

19. Sri Radhakrishna Sahni

1985

Sri Rameshwar Sahni

1985

Sri Chando Paswan

20. Sri Ramgulam Paswan

1985

Sri Unnat Yadav

21. Sri Upendar Yadav

1985

Sri Krupal Paswan

22. Sri Ramayan Paswan

1985

23. Sri Chauhan

Sri Itwari Chouhan

1985

24. Sri Bonod Kumar

Sri Krishna Chouhan

1985

25. Sri Madeswar Chouhan

Sri Siv Chouhan

1985

26. Sri Rambrikh Chouhan

Sri Ramrup Chouhan

1985

27. Sri Kaleswar Prasad

Sri Sivbalak Mahto

28. Sri Sarban Kumar

1985

Sri Kishori Mahto

1985

29. Sri Sahinder Mahto

Sri Bachan Mahto

1985

30. Sri Janardan Chouhan

Sri Chalitar Chouhan

ANNEXURE

नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2009

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, PATNA

Reference Case No. 74 ( C) of 2008

का. आ. 2805.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार सेंट्रल बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में श्रम न्यायालय , पटना के पंचाट [संदर्भ संख्या 74 ( सी )/2008 ] को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12011/55/2008- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

Between the Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India , Zonal Office, 2nd Floor, Block -B, Maurya Lok Complex , Dak- Bunglow Road , Patna and their workman Sri Ravindra KumarGupta, represented by the Deputy General Secretary , Industrial Mazdoor Congress , 204 , Friends Garden Apartment, Road No. 2, Extension Rajbanshi Nagar, Patna .

New Delhi , the 16th September, 2009

For the Management Shri S.N. Singh , Sr. Manager, Central Bank of India, Katihar.

For theWorkman

Shri D. Ram , Authorised Representative .

PRESENT :

S.O. 2805.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. No. 74(C)/ 2008 ] of the Labour Court , Patna now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relationto the management of Central Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-09-2009 .

Shri Birendra Singh , Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal , Patna .

[No. L- 12011/55/2008 - IR (B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer 6138

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ] AWARD

ANNEXURE

Patna, dated the 7th September, 2009

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

A. A. Lad, Presiding Officer

Reference No. CGIT- 2/ 17 of 2008

Employers in relation to the management of Mumbai Port Trust

By adjudication order No. L- 12011 /55/2008 - IR (B- II) dated 26-8-2008 , the Govt . of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi under clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called ' the Act' for brevity) has referred the following dispute between the Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office , 2nd Floor, Block-B , Maurya LokComplex, Patna and their workman Sri Ravindra Kumar Gupta, represented by the General Secretary, Industrial Mazdoor Congress , Patna for adjudication to this Tribunal onfollowing:

The Chairman,

Mumbai Port Trust, PortBhavan , S. V. , Marg ,

Ballard Estate,

Mumbai -400001

FirstParty

V/s

TheirWorkmen

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Purnea in terminating and not reinstating and regularizing the service of Sri Ravindra Kumar Gupta working as daily wage worker in Class - IV subordinate staff without complying Section 25F of I.D. Act is justified and legal ?What relief the workman concerned is entitled to ?"

The Secretary,

2. Both the parties appeared on notice and filed statement of claim and the written statement .

Mumbai -400010

Mh. P. T. Dock & General Employees Union, PortTrust Kamgar Sadan , Nawab Tank Road , Mazgaon, Second Party

APPEARANCE

3. On last several dates neither workman is present nor his representative appears no any steps has been taken. I presume that the workman or his representative is not interested to pursue this reference and has nothing to say in his favour. Under the circumstances . , I hereby pass a "No Dispute Award " in the circumstances above .

Forthe Employer

: Shri M. B. Anchan, Advocate

3. And this is my Award.

FortheWorkman

: Absent

BIRENDRA SINGH , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर, 2009

Date ofpassing the Award : 12-8-2009

AWARD

The matrix of the facts as culled out from the proceedings are as under :

का. आ. 2806.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार मुम्बई पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. - 2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 2/17/2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -31011/22 /2007- आई . आर. (बी- II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 16th September , 2009

1. The Government of India , Ministry of Labour by its Order No. L- 31011 /22/2007- IR (B- II) dated 21st February, 2008 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub -section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management ofMumbai PortTrust by terminating the services of Shri Shreenadhudu Raidu , Store Worker w.e.f. 19-3-2004 isjustified ? If not , what relief the Union is entitled to ?"

S.O. 2806. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/17/2008 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mumbai Port Trust and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 16-9-2009.

[No. L-31011 /22/2007- IR (B- II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

2. Notice was sent to the 2nd Party and was served on Union vide Exhibit 3. However, nobody appeared in the proceedings from 2nd Party. No steps were taken by 2nd [भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

6139

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

Partyto file Claims Statement. It led me to pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference is disposed off for want of prosecution.

A. A. LAD, Presiding Officer Bombay, 12th August , 2009

नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2807.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं डब्ल्यू. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 97/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/27/2005- आई. आर. ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 16th September , 2009 S.O. 2807.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 97/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court,Nagpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Western Coalfields Limited, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 16-9-2009 .

[No. L-22012/27/2005 - IR ( CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI A. N. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER , CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT/NGP/97/2005

AWARD

(Dated: 28th August, 2009)

1. The Central Government after satisfying the existence ofdispute between the General Secretary , SKMS (AITUC) , CRO Camp , Iklehra , Chhindwara (on behalfof Shri Jamna Prasad) (Party No. 1) and the General Manager, Pench Area of WCL, Parasia , Chhindwara (Party No. 2) referred the same for adjudication to this Tribunal vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 27/ 2005/ IR (CM -II) dated 28-11-2005 under clause (d) of Sub - section ( 1 ) and Sub - section (2A) ofSection 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) with the following schedule .

2. क्या प्रबंधतंत्र महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्ड लिमिटेड, पेंच एरिया पोस्ट परासिया जिला छिंदवाडा म.प्र. के प्रबंधन द्वारा श्री जमना प्रसाद आत्मज श्री ब्रजलाल एम . पी. आर. टो. नं . 716 विष्णुपुरी भूमिगत खान नं. 1 को 15-6-2001 के आदेश द्वारा सेवा समाप्तिके दंड से दंडित किये जाने की कार्यवाही न्यायोचित है ? यदि नहींतो संबंधित कर्मकार किस अनुतोष का हकदार है ?

3. The Petitioner Shri Jamna Prasad , Token No. 716 wasworking as a Ex - M.P.R . in Vishnupuri Mine No. 1 of Pench Area has raised the dispute before the ALC and on failing ofthe conciliation proceeding, the Government had referred it to the CGIT. During the pendency of the dispute i.e. reference No. 97/2005 on 7-7-2009 both the parties settled it amicably outside the Court . They arrived at following certain conditions .

Terms and Conditions :

1. Shri Jamna Prasad S/o Brijlal , Ex- MPR, Vishnupuri MineNo. 1 ofPench Area will be re- employed afresh asGeneral Mazdoor in Cat- I for underground mine ofPathakhera Area and he will be paid initial basic of Cat. I(UG) .

2. Such re-employment will be subject to medical fitness so certifiedby the Company Doctor.

Date: 28-8-2009

: The General Secretary , Petitioner/ PartyNo. 1

Sanyukta Koyla Mazdoor Sangh (AITUC) ,

CentralOffice: CRO Camp , Ikalhara,

Chhindwara (on behalf of Shri JamnaPrasad)

Versus

: The General Manager ,

Pench Area of WCL , Respondent/ PartyNo. 2

PO: Parasia,

Distt. Chhindwara (M.P.) 3. Shri Jamna Prasad S/ o Brijlal , Ex - MPR, Vishnupuri Mine No. 1 ofPench Area shall remain on probation fora period of one year from the date ofjoining and hehas to put in minimum 190 days of attendance in a year. In case his attendance and general performance is not found satisfactory by the management, his services shall automatically stand terminated without any enquiry or assigning any reason thereof.

4. Shri Jamna Prasad S/o Brijlal , Ex- MPR, Vishnupuri Mine No. 1 of Pench Area shall be entitled only for continuity of service for the limited purpose of gratuity and this will be a full and final settlement. Further, the benefit of continuity of service will not be extended in such case whether the person has been paid gratuity payment . This shall be full and final settlement and no further claim what so ever shall be made in future .

6140

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

5. The periodfrom the date of termination till re- employment and joining on his duty will be treated as dies -non on the principle of no work no pay .

6. Form- H settlement individually or through union, incorporating the above terms and conditions for entering into employment and the same will be sent for registration to the Labour machinery .

7. In case any dispute is pending before the CGIT , the re - employed person should withdraw the same from CGITby filing a copy ofsettlement for consent award. Ifany matter is pending before any other courts , the union/ex - employee will withdraw the case from the concerned court . The case No. NGP/97/05 of Shri Jamna Prasad S/o Brijlal is pending before the Hon'ble Court ofNagpur .

8. He shall have no right to apply for VRS at later stage.

The parties have produced the pursis before the Court on 25-8-2009 . They agreed it before the Court and requested for the Award in that terms . I accepted it and recorded the compromise Award in the terms of it. Consequently, there remained no dispute due to the compromise. Hence , this no dispute Award.

Date: 28-8-2009

A. N. YADAV, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2009

[PART II -SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI GYANANDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- 1 , CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 17/2005

Shri Ganesh Kalia ,

Applicant S/o Shri Mulk Raj Kalia , C/o Shri J. C. Bhardwaj , President HPATTUC , HQ Saproon , Solan, (Himachal Pradesh)

Versus

1. The Chairman ,

Managing Committee , 'Cell' Canteen , 105, Vayu Raksha Regiment, C/ o 56 APO

2. The Chairman, Managing Committee Canteen, 715 ( 1 ) Ad, Brigade C/ o 56 APO

3. The Manager ,

Respondents Vajra Canteen Una (HP)

APPEARANCES

For the Workman

का. आ. 2808.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बज्रा स्टेशन कैंटीन के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं. -1 , चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 17/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 16-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012/ 51/2004- आई आर ( डी. यू. ) ]

सुरेन्द्र सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 16th September, 2009 S.O. 2808.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 17/2005 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum-Labour Court No. 1 , Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Cantonment Board and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 16-9-2009.

[No. L- 14012/51/2004- IR (DU)] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

: Shri J. C. Bhardwaj

: Shri Sanjeev Sharma For the Management

AWARD Passed on 26-8-2009

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 14012/ 51/2004 - IR (DU) Dated 6-4-2005 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication of this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of management of Vajra Station Canteen , Una in terninating of the services of Sh . Ganesh Kalia w.e. f. 29-5-2000 without notice and without any payment of retrenchment compensation is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what reliefthe workman is entitled and from which date ? "

Fromthe perusal of statement of claim , it is evident thatthe contention of the workman is that vide appointment letter No. 1554/ I/Cell/PC/ CC/ 02 dated 27-10-1990, he was appointed on the designated peramanent post of Salesman at Una ( HP) . After appointment, the workman was pressurized to sign a so - called Agreement, which was not signed wilfully by the workman but under duress . This agreement was not valid and genuine , which is against the public policy. The service conditions of the workmann were changed by the management , which in violation of the provisions of the Act . He was appointed against the 6141 [ भाग II- खंड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10 , 2009/आश्विन18 , 1931

working post in 5 lakh M.T. Una but had to work Sub Area Ambala Cant with respondent No. 1 to 4. The workman was in the regular service of the management and had completed 240 days in several calendar years , he worked with the management . His termination was illegal being against the provisions of articles 14, 16, 21 and 41 ofthe Constitution of India . His juniors were retained in the service . New hands were recruited, whereas his services were terminated . The workman is the Government servant and isgoverned under CCA Rules being this establishment duly covered under the Shops and Commercial Establishments Act. On the basis of above facts , the workman has requested for setting aside his termination order and for reinstatement of services with full back wages and consequential reliefs .

The first issue to be decided by this Tribunal is whether the management of canteen is an industry and this Tribunal has jurisdiction to answer the reference ? Whether a particular organization is an industry or not is settled by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply& Sewerage Board Versus A. Rajappa & Others AUIR, 1978 - SC -548. If the principals laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply case ( supra) , the industrial character of any organization can be seen on the basis of activities carried on and functions discharged by it. The function of the canteen is to provide the services to the military persons by supplying certain commodities of public utility.On the basis of the functions discharged and activities carried on by the canteens , I am of the view that the management of canteen cannot seek exemption from thedefinition of industry as given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board's case . It is the contention of the management that sovereign function isdischarged by the management and as such it is exempted from the definition of industry . I am not inclined to accept this contention on the basis of activities of the canteen and services dischargedbyit . Accordingly , the management of canteen is an industry as per the definition of industry given in the Industrial Disputes Act and in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board's case ( supra) .

The management has raised the preliminary objections that it is not an industry as per the definition of the industry given in the Act . It is also contended by the management in its written statement that the appointment of the workman was purely contractual and on expiry of the term of contract his services automatically come to an end, and he was not accordingly, terminated by the management . It is also contended by the management that these canteens have been established and maintained for the welfare of the military personnel and the persons appointed to run the administration of the canteens are bound by the terms and conditions of the appointment letter.

It is the settled principle of service jurisprudence that if the relief claimed by any workman could only be givenunder the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act , the Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Act has thejurisdiction to redress the same . The relief sought bythe workman in the claim objection in question can only be granted under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act; accordingly, this Tribunal has got the jurisdictionto adjudicate the matter and to redress the grievances of the workman.

Both of the parties were afforded the opportunity of adducing evidence . Workman and management both filed their respective affidavits , which were treated as the examination-in -chief. The workman, Shri Ganesh Kalia, was cross-examined by the management, but the witness ofthe management could not turn up and vide order dated 20-5- 2009 evidence of the management was closed with an order thatthe affidavit filed by it shall not be considered, because the witness was not put to cross - examination .

Certain documents were also filed by the parties .

Three appointment letters are on record. The first appointment letters is dated 20-11-94 and second and third is dated 6-9-1994 and 11-9-1995 respectively. I have head learned counsel for the parties and perused entire materials on record.

By the appointment letters available on record , it is evidently clear that workman was appointed for a fixed period, which was extended from time to time and on every extension, a fresh appointment letter for a fixed period was givenby the management . The workman has challenged it as the agreement under duress . Where any party to the instrument challenged , the terms and conditions of the same on the grounds of its execution under duress , he has to prove the duress . There is not a single word in statement ofclaim and affidavits filed by the workman about the nature ofduress . There is not an iota of evidence on record to prove the circumstances , which can explain the nature of transaction as duress .

Workman has relied upon a judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court published in 2001 - LAVIC ( SC ) -488 , Union of India and others Vs. F. Aslam and others . The workman hasalso provided a zeroex copy of terms and conditions of service of URC Employees . Apart from it, the workman has also relied upon 2005 - LLR , 417 , A. C. Sharma Versus Delhi Stock Exchange and 2007- LLR 322 , Punjab National Bank and others Versus Dev Dutt Sharma and others .

I have gone through the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble the Apex Court and Himachal Pradesh High Court, as relied upon the workman .

The workman has relied upon ajudgment of Hon'ble theApex Court published in 2001 LAVIC- SC -488 , Union of India& Others Versus F. Aslam & Others . In thisjudgment , theApex Court disposed of several Civil Appeals against the judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal . On the issue whether the workman serving in Unit Run Canteen (inquestion) are the Government employee ? Hon'ble Apex Court answered in positive that the workman working or 6142

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii)) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

I have gone through all the appointment letters issueds to the workman . Every appointment was given for a fixed period and on fixed wages . The services of the workman were retrenched before issuing the terms and conditions of service of Unit Run Canteen employees by the Defence Ministry in compliance of the judgment of Hon'ble apex Court in Union of India & Others Versus F. Aslam & Others ( supra). The condition number one is that onexpiry of the term of contract, the time of contract shall automatically lapse/expires . There are so many other modes for termination of the workman by giving one month's notice, but it is specifically mentioned in every contract , which was based for providing the service to the workman that on the expiry ofthe term of contract , the contract will automatically lapse/expires . Thus , on expiry ofthe contract , the services ofthe workman terminated automatically and no order in this regard was required to be passed .

employed in Unit Run Canteens are Government servants . It is also held by the Apex Court that by itself if so only would not entitle them getting all the service benefits ,which are available to Government servants or its counterparts serving in the canteens . It would necessarily depend upon the nature and duties , discharged by them as well as on the rules and regulations and administrative Instructions issuedby the employer . Hon'ble Apex Court also directed theMinistry of Defence , Union of India , to determine the service conditions of the employees at the Unit Run Canteens at an early date , preferably within one month from the date ofjudgment . In another appeal against the order of Central Administrative Tribunal , Jodhpur Branch, in the same judgment, the Hon'ble Apex Court has also held that notwithstanding the fact and that we have recorded the conclusion with the employees serving in Unit Run Canteens could be treated as Government servants but that does not necessarily mean that the service conditions of such employees are covered by fundamental rules . It will be open for the employer to frame separate conditions of service of the employees or to adopt the fundamental rules . There is no decision of the employer that fundamental rules would be applicable to said employees and in the absence of such decision , the Tribunal was not justified to direct that the question of payment of subsistence allowance should be reviewed in accordance with the provisions contained in the fundamental rules .

Hon'ble Apex Court by holding the jurisdiction of Central . Administrative Tribunal on the basis raised before the Central Administrative Tribunal set aside the part of the order directing for reviewing the payment of subsistence allowance in terms of fundamental rules .

Therest two judgments relied upon by the workman are on the different issues that if the termination is held up illegally by this Tribunal, a reasonable compensation may be an alternative remedy.

First of all, this Tribunal has to consider whether the termination ofthe workman was illegal being against the provisions of the Act and the rules of the department ?

Itistrue that vide judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India & Others Versus F. Aslam & Others (supra), the workman is a Government servant but Hon'ble Apex Courthas specifically mèntioned in the said judgment that the workman will not be covered by fundamental rules nor he will be at liberty to claim the parity in the matters of wages and allowances of the Central Store Department . Under such circumstances , the disengagement of the services of the workman , as stated earlier , has to be seen on the basis of terms and conditions of the appointment letter. The appointment letters specifically mention that on expiry ofterm of contrct , the contrct will lapse/expire automatically. The workman has challenged the nature of contract on the ground of its execution under duress . As stated earlier , there is no iota of evidence to prove the content ofduress . Accordingly , for the period the workman remained in the service shall be treated as the Government servant as per thejudgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India& Others Versus F. Aslam & Others ( supra) but the services of the workman came to an end automatically on expiryofthe term of contract as per the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment . At the cost of repetition in the said judgment the Hon'ble apex Court has specifically mentioned that the fundamental rules will not be applicable in the case of workman working in the Unit RunCanteens and such workman cannot claim parity with the employees of Canteen Store Department, which is a partof Ministry of Defence in the matter of pay and allowances .

Thus , on the basis of the above observations , I am of the view that services of the workman automatically terminated on expiry of term of contract and his services were not retrenched by the management of Vajra Station Canteen. Reference is answered accordingly . The workman is not entitled to any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of Award, and thereafter, file be consigned to record room.

G. K. SHARMA , Presiding Officer After the judgment of Apex Court in Union of India &Others Versus F. Alsam & Others ( supra , Ministry of Defence , Government of India framed service rules regarding the terms and conditions of Services of Unit Run Canteen's employees . I have also gone through all the rules . These rules provide for payment of salary, other allowances etc. , but are silent on the nature of appointment to be made by management of canteen. Thus, the validity and legality of appointment is to be settled by this Tribunal on the basis of letters issued to the workman from time to time. The workman has worked in different canteens on different appointment letters (contract) . The workman has to work on different canteens because of administrative exigencies as by the administrative decision , separate canteens were established .

6143 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

2.The reference under adjudication is as under :

नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर, 2009

"Whether the action of the General Manager , Ordnance Factory, Kanpur in terminating the services oftheir workman Sh . Abhimanyu w.e.f. 10-6-95 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what relief the workman isentitled ?"

3. In nutshell the facts are as under ;

का. आ. 2809.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ऑर्डनैन्स फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 181/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012/59/2000- आई आर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

Sh . Abhimanyu was worker in Ordnance Factory, Kanpur. Charge sheet dt . 23-9-93 was served to him for the following alleged misconduct:

NewDelhi , the 17th September, 2009

"Sh. Abhimanyu while functioning as M. Boy, ΕΛΟ during the period of his employment absented unauthorisedly and was in habit of absenting from dutywithoutprior intimation/sanction of leave in as much as he has absented for 308 days on 41 oceassions during the period from 14-1-92 10 27-7-93 in violation of leave rules . "

S.O. 2809. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 181 / 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relationto the management of Ordnance Factory and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17-9-2009.

[No. L- 14012/59/2000 - IR (DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

4. The workman in his statement of claim alleged that during enquiry reasonable opportunityto defend himselfwas not afforded to him and enquiry was conducted ex-party without applying the principle of natural justice , without application ofmind and in a very arbitrary manner. Hefurther alleged that the findings of the enquiry officer are based upon surmises and conjuncture only and are patently illegal and perverse .

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW

PRESENT : Shri N. K. Purohit , Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 181/2000

Ref. No. L- 14012/ 59 /2000- IR ( DU) dated: 31-10-2000

BETWEEN

5. In rebuttal, the management has denied the above allegations and submitted that the workman did not reply the charge - sheet inspite of reminders . He did not furnish hisreply ofdefence during departmental enquiry. Neither he appeared before the enquiry officer nor he produced any defence for defending the charges , therefore , witness were examined in ex - party proceeding and the enquiry officer found him guilty for the alleged charges ultimately his services were terminated vide impugned order dt . 10-6-95 . The following preliminary issues were framed an 3-7-2003:

Sh . Abhimanyu S / o Sh . Ram Kishan Through Smt . Sushila Singh , 116/209B , Rawatpur Village , Kanpur (U.P. )

AND

1. Kya Karamkar to Vibhagiya Janch mein bachav ka upyukt awasar nahi diya gaya ?

2. Kya vibhagiya janch nyay ke nesargik sidhanta ke khilafki gay ? Yadi han to prabhav ?

The General Manager Ordnance Factory , Kanpur (U.P.)

AWARD

6. Vide orderdt. 3-1-2005 both the preliminary issues have been decided against the workman.

7. Subsequent to the decision on the preliminary issues , the workman has filed his affidavit whereas despite opportunityprovided to the management, no evidence has beenadduced by the management .

8. None appeared on behalf of the management therefore heard the learned representative on behalf of the workman and perused the relevant material on record .

1. By Order No. L- 14012/ 59/2000- IR (DU) dated : 31-10-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour , New Delhi is exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Sh . Abhimanyu S/o Sh. Ram Kishan through Smt. Sushila Singh , 116/209B, Rawatpur Village , Kanpur and the General Manager , Ordnance Factory, Kanpur for adjudication .

3540GI/2009-20 6144

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

9. Theonly question thus survives for consideration, is whether the punishment of terminating the services of the workmanfor the alleged misconduct is disproportionate to the delinquent workman in view of the alleged misconduct against him .

10. Learned representative on behalf of the workman submitted that the workman joined services in the year 1986 andhis service have been terminated in the year 1995 vide impugned order for the charge of remaining absent during the period 14-1-92 to 27-7-93 for total 308 days on different occasions . He has submitted that punishment of termination of services is wholly disproportionate . The punishment awarded should be commensurate with gravity ofcharges levelled against the delinquent therefore , under Section 11A this Tribunal has ample power to award any lessor punishment . He has further requested that the workman may be reinstated without back wages but with continuity ofservice. In support ofhis contentions reliance has beenplaced on the following case law:

1. 1989 SCC (L & S ) 180 Scooters India Ltd. , Lucknow Vs. Labour Court & others .

2. 1984 SCC (L&S) 33 Jitendra Singh Rathor Vs. BaidNath Ayurved Bhawan .

3. 2009 ( 1 ) SCC ( L& S) Managing Director , Balasaheb Desai Sahakari S. K. Ltd. Vs. Kashinath Ganpati Kambale

11. Under Section 11A of the I.D. Act, the Tribunal has been empowered to set aside the order of dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions , if any, as it thinks fit or give such relief to theworkman including the award of any lessor punishment in lieu ofdischarge or punishment as the circumstances of the case may require.

12. In 1989 SCC ( L& S) 180 Hon'ble Apex Court held that the charges framed against the respondent pertaining to acts ofmajor misconduct and all the charges were found proved in the respective enquiries , the Laobur Court held that the enquiry having conformed to the statutory prescriptions and the principles of natural justice , were not vitiated in any manner and as such the findings rendered by the enquiry officer and accepted by the Disciplinary Authoritywere not open to challenge . However, the Labour Court observed that ends ofjustice would meet , if back wages to the extent of 75% are allowed to the workman . The Hon'ble High Court declined to quash the award of the Labour Court . While dismissing the management's appeal , the Hon'ble Apex Court held that Labour Court had not exercised his power under Section 6(2 - A) in arbitrary andjudicial manner.

13. In 1984 SCC ( L& S ) 333 the alleged misconduct against the workman was found proved but order of dismissal set aside and workman was reinstated with half back wages by the Tribunal under Section 11 - A . Hon'ble

[PART II-SEC.3( ii) ] Apex Court held that under Section 11 -A wide discretion has been vested in the Tribunal in the matter of awarding relief according to the circumstances of the case.

1 14. In 2009 ( 1 ) SCC ( L& S ) Managing Director , Balasaheb Desai Sahakari S.K. Ltd. Vs. Kashinath Ganapati Kambale the workman was found guilty of indiscipline , absenteeism , reporting late to work and he was dismissed from the services . The Tribunal passed the award of reinstatement with continuity in service with 50% back wages as punishment of termination found disproportionate tothe charges of misconduct leveled against the workman. While considering the jurisdiction of Labour Court under Section 11 -A of the I.D. Act to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:

"Indisputably , the Labour Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act was entitled to consider as to whether the punishment awarded is wholly disproportionate tothedelinquent employee or not but it is well known that the discretion vested in it must be exercised in a judicious manner. The Labour Court ordinarily should not interfere with the discretion exercised by the employer unless the same is found to be inconsistent withthe provisions of a statute of otherwise perverse or unjust. It may be true that in terms of the Model Standing Order framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders ) Act, 1946, ordinarily fine for wrongful absence was to be imposed but in this regard the number of occasions on which the workman had remained on unauthorised absence was also required to be taken into consideration . In the case, depart from remaining unauthorisedly absent without leave , the respondent had been charged with indiscipline at the workplace. He not only was found guilty of remaining unauthorisedly absent but also guilty of misbehaviour with his superiors , leaving place of work early without permission and without leave , signing the muster for showing presence although he was absent. "

15. Inthe said case Hon'ble Apex Court held that no back wages should be awarded in favour ofthe respondent , however, the sum of Rs . 60,000 had already been paidto the respondent , therefore , directed that amount paid shall not be recovered .

16. In present case , the only charge against the workman is for remaining unauthorisedly absent during the period 14-1-92 to 27-7-93 for 308 days on different occasions . There is no material on record which reveals that earlier to said period , the workman was ever punished for such misconduct since hejoined the service in the year 1986. Thus , looking to the nature of job , the period of service , the period of remaining unauthorisedly absent , the punishment of termination of services of the [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

6145

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18 , 1931

workman for alleged misconduct seems to be wholly dis-proportionate .

17. In light of legal propositions laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforementioned case laws and having regard to the entire facts and circumstances ofthe case , the interest of justice would be subserved , if the workman reinstated without any back wages with continuity ofservice.

18. In view of the above discussions , the action of themanagement in terminating the services ofthe workman Sh. Abhimanyu w.e.f. 10-6-1995 is unjustified to this extent thatpunishment imposed upon him for the charge ofalleged misconduct is wholly disproportionate. Therefore, the same ismodified and instead of termination of services , lesser punishment is imposed upon him exercising powers under Section 11A of the I.D. Act . The workman be reinstated without back wages with continuity of service within two months from the date of publication ofthis award.

19. The reference under adjudication be answered accordingly.

Lucknow

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer 9-9-2009

नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2810.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार गन कैरिज फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्रके सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, जबलपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एलसी/आर/31/92 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-14012/93/91- डी-2 ( बी) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 17th September , 2009 S.O. 2810. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ LC/R/31/92 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Gun Carriage Factory and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on17-9-2009.

[No. L- 14012/93/91 -D-2 (B) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

No. CGIT/LC/R/31 /92

Shri Mohd. Shakir Hasan-Presiding Officer Shri Ramesh Prasad, Qr . No. 1503 , Belbag ( E) , Chamrouti Mohalla,

Bhantalaiyya, Jabalpur (MP)

Workman/Union

Versus

...Management TheGeneral Manager , GunCarriage Factory, Jabalpur (MP)

AWARD

Passed on this 1st day of September , 2009 1. TheGovernment of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Notification No. L- 14012/93 /91 -D- 2 (B ) dated 20-2-92 hasreferredthe following dispute for adjudication by this tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of Gun Carriage Factory, Jabalpur in terminating the services ofSh. Ramesh Prasad, Ex -T. No. 398 /IE Mochi - B vide their order dated 21-8-89 is justified ? If not what relief he is entitled to ?"

2. The case of the workman in short is that he was employed in the Gun Carriage Factory , Jabalpur as Mochi "B" , Ticket No. 798/ 1E , in Carpenter section since 24-5-1973 . He was served with charge- sheet vide Memo No. 693018/87/40 dated 25-9-1987 for attempted theft of Government property. Enquiry was held and charge was not proved and the items seized were found the personal property as supported by Cash Receipt dated 26-8-1987. TheEnquiry Officer submitted enquiry report giving the workman a benefit of doubt of the charge of attempt to theft. The Disciplinary Authority disagreed with the finding ofthe E.O. and gave his own finding and found the workman guiltyofattempt to theft . The Disciplinary Authority passed sentence of removal from service vide order dated 21-8- 1989. The workman appealed to the Director General , Ordnance Factory, Calcutta but no order was passed . He also gave reminder to the Appellate Authority but the same was also un- replied. It is alleged that the Disciplinary Authorityhasdescended from the finding of the Enquiry Officer without any justification and the order of removal from service is fit to be set aside . The Disciplinary Authority relied upon the statements recorded prior to the enquiry and the security officer was inimical to the workman . It is alleged that no show cause notice was asked by the 6146

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10, 2009 / ASVINA 18 , 1931

Disciplinary authority before passing descending view from the Enquiry Officer . It is submitted that the workman be reinstated with back wages .

3.TheManagement/non- applicant appeared and filed WrittenStatement . The case of the management, inter alia, is that the workman was found in possession of Brass Button, Brass buckles and Copper Rivets weighing about 2.750 Kg , concealed in a piece of cloth and plastic paper tied in his Lungkoot ( suspender/underwear) and charge- sheetwas served . On his denial , the enquiry was held . The Enquiry Officer found the charge not proved and gave the benefit of doubt . The Disciplinary Officer disagreed the findings of the Enquiry Officer and gave his own reasoning on the basis ofprinciples ofprobability. The Disciplinary Authority found sufficient evidence to substantiate the charge ofattempted theft and passed the order of removal from the service . On thses grounds , it is submitted that the action ofthe management in terminating the service ofthe workmanw.e.f. 21-8-89 is justified and legal .

4.The preliminary issue was initially decided by the predecessor's Court on 4-6-99 and it was held that the Controlling Officer has arbitrary drawn the inference of guilt against the workman. This order is regular and illegal . The predecessor's Court had further allowed the management to adduce evidence before the Court to prove misconduct of the workman .

5. Both the parties have not adduced any evidence in court thereafter . It appears that sufficient time was granted to prove the charge against the workman . The burdenwas totally on the management to prove the charge . About4½ years time was granted to the management . Lastly his evidence was closed on 24-12-04, since there was no evidence on record against the workman , the workman also preferred not examine any evidence .

6. Considering the discussion made above , I find that the management has completely failed to prove the charge ofmisconduct against the workman. Thus the action of the management of Gun Carriage Factory , Jabalpur in terminating the services of Shri Ramesh Prasad, Ex . T. No. 398 / IE Mochi " B " vide their order dated 21-8-89 is unjustified. He is therefore , reinstated on the post with back wages .

7. The award is , accordingly, answered with cost of Rs. 1000 ( Rupecs One Thousand only) .

8. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India , Ministry of Labour and Employment asper rules.

MOHD. SHAKIR HASAN, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 17 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2811.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत हैवी

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] इलेक्ट्रिकल्स्लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चेन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/2009 ) कोप्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42011 /15/2009- आई आर ( डीयू) ] सुरेन्द्र सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 17th September, 2009 S.O. 2811. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 43/2009 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court , Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 17-9-2009 .

[No. L -42011/ 15/2009 - IR(DU) ] SURENDRA SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, CHENNAI

Thursday , the 10th September , 2009 Present: Shri A.N. Janardanan , Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 43/2009

[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) ofsub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , between the Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. and their workmen]

BETWEEN

The General Secretary Employees Progressive Union M/s. BharatHeavy Electrials Ltd, Trichy-14 :

Petitioner/l Party

AND

TheDeputyGeneral Manager ( HR - TM ) BharatHeavy Electricals Ltd, Trichy-14 Respondent/ 11 Party APPEARANCE :

Forthe Petitioner : Sri R. Babu

For the 1st Management : M/ s . T.S. Gopalan and Co.

[ भाग II- खंड 3 (ii) ]

6147

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन 18, 1931

AWARD

The Central Government , Ministry of Labour vide its order no. L-42011 / 15 /2009 - IR (DU ) dated 29-05-2009 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. , Trichy , in imposing the punishment of demotion on their workman Sri R. Ethiraj , w.e.f. 27-08-2008 is legal and justified ? Ifnot , what relief the workman is entitled to?"

2.After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 43/2009 . Pursuant to notice under RPAD, both parties entered appearance through their advocates .

3. When the matter stood posted for filing claim statement, it was represented on behalf of the petitioner thata settlement talk is going on and the matter is likely to be settled. On the adjourned date ofposting , a joint memo was filed signed by the respective parties and their counsel reporting the dispute to have been amicably settled between the parties . No Claim or Counter Statement has been filed by the respective parties.

4. Thejoint memo finds embodied in it the terms of the settlement, inter alia that workman R. Ethiraj accepts the punishment that however the management with a view to maintain good industrial relationship having agreed to reduce the punishment of reversion to the lower grade for a period of one year instead of for a period of 2 years as originally awarded which has been accepted by the workman and with which settlement there has been conscensus ad- idem to treat the dispute interse fully and finally settled and with an understanding not to reopen the same by either party. In consideration of the said terms, joint memo has been filed treating the dispute as closed. The same is recorded . I am satisfied that the settlement voluntary and is for the benefit of the petitioner .

5. Discernibly, the settlement terms indicate that the punishment imposed is legal and justified. However, the management has on benign consideration reduced the punishment of reversion for 2 years into 1 year showing some magnanimity towards the workman which he has accepted.Accordingly, the matter has been settled between the parties giving no room for reopening the same to give rise to any future dispute in respect of the same matter .

6. In the result an award is passed in terms of the settlement as per the joint memo filed . The joint memo will form part ofthe record.

7. Thus the reference is answered accordingly .

(Dictated to the P.A. , transcribed and typed by him , corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this daythe 10th September, 2009) .

A.N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer Witnesses Examined :

: None

For the I Party/Petitioner

: None

For the II Party/Management

Documents Marked :

On the Petitioner's side

Ex. No.

Description On the Management's side

Date

Ex.No.

Description

Date Nil Nil

नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2812.- जबकि मैसर्स केपजेमिनी कंस्लटिंग इंडिया प्रा.लि. ( मुंबई- II क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या एमएच/टीएचएन/43355 के अंतर्गत ) ( एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) कर्मचारी भविष्य निधिऔर प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियम के रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है ।

2. और जबकि, केन्द्र सरकार के विचार में अंशदान दर के मामले में उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के भविष्य निधि के नियम उसके कर्मचारियों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 में विनिर्दिष्ट की तुलना में कम हितकर नहीं हैं और कर्मचारी भी समान प्रकृति के किसी अन्य प्रतिष्ठान के कर्मचारियों के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम या कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि योजना, 1952 ( एतदुपरान्त उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) के अंतर्गत अन्य भविष्य निधि लाभ भी प्राप्त कर रहे हैं ।

3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा , अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय- समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए, उक्तप्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-04-2007 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/61/2009 - एसएस- II ] एस.डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव NewDelhi , the 24th September, 2009 S.O. 2812. Whereas M/s Capgemini Consulting India Private Ltd. (under Code No. MH/THN/43355 in Mumbai - II Region) ( hereinafter referred to as the establishment) has applied for exemption under clause ( a ) ofsub -section ( 1) of Section 17 ofthe Employees ' Provident Funds andMiscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government , the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are not less favourable to employees therein than those 6148

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009 /ASVINA 18, 1931

specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident funds benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character.

3. Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Actand subject to the conditions specified in this regard from timetotime, the Central Government, hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-04-2007 until fürther notification .

[No. $-35015/61/2009-SS- II ] S.D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 24 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2813.-जबकि मैसर्स एवाया ग्लोबल कोनेक्ट लि. (अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र में कोड संख्या जीजे/ 18706 के अंतर्गत ) (एतदुपरान्त प्रतिष्ठान के रूप में संदर्भित ) ने कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध अधिनियम, 1952 ( 1952 का 19 ) ( एतदुपरान्त अधिनियमके रूप में संदर्भित ) की धारा 17 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क) के अंतर्गत छूट के लिए आवेदन दिया है ।

3. केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा, अब उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए तथा इस संबंध में समय - समय पर विनिर्दिष्ट शर्तों को ध्यान में रखते हुए, उक्त प्रतिष्ठान को उक्त योजना के समस्त उपबंधों के प्रचालन से 01-10-1990 से अगली अधिसूचना तक के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

[सं. एस-35015/56/2007 - एस.एस.- II ]

एस.डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 24th September , 2009 S.O. 2813. Whereas M/ s Avaya Global Connect Ltd. (under Code No. GJ/ 18706 in Ahmedabad Region) (hereinafter referred to as the establishment ) has applied for exemption under clause ( a) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act , 1952 ( 19 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as theAct) .

2. And whereas in the opinion of the Central Government, the rules of the provident fund of the said establishment with respect to the rates of contribution are

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

not less favourable to employees therein than those specified in Section 6 of the said Act and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident funds benefits provided under the said Act or under the Employees ' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) in relation to the employees in any other establishment of similar character .

3. Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 17 of the said Act and subject to the conditions specified in this regard from timeto time, the Central Government, hereby exempts the said establishment from the operation of all the provisions ofthe said Scheme with effect from 01-10-1990 until further notification .

[No. S -35015 /56/2007 - SS - II ] S.D.XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2814.- केन्द्रीय सरकार , कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 34 ) की धारा 91 - क के साथ पठित धारा 88 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए एतद्वारा अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट कारखानों/स्थापनाओं के नियमित कर्मचारियों को उक्त अधिनियमके प्रचालन से 1-10-2008 से 30-09-2010 तक की अवधि के लिए छूट प्रदान करती है ।

2. उक्त छूट निम्नलिखित शर्तों के अधीन हैं ; अर्थात्:-

( 1 ) पूर्वोक्त स्थापना जिसमें कर्मचारी नियोजित हैं , एक रजिस्टर रखेगी , जिसमें छूट प्राप्त कर्मचारियों के नाम और पदनाम दिखाये जायेंगे ;

(2 ) इस छूट के होते हुए भी , कर्मचारी उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन ऐसी प्रसुविधाएं प्राप्त करते रहेंगे जिनको पाने के लिए वे इस अधिसूचना द्वारा दी गई छूट के प्रवृत्त होने की तारीख से पूर्व संदत्त अंशदानों के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते हैं;

(3) छूट प्राप्त अवधि के लिए, यदि कोई अभिदाय पहले ही किए जा चुके हों, तो वे वापस नहीं किए जाएंगे ;

(4) उक्त कारखाने/स्थापना का नियोजक उस अवधि की बाबत जिसके दौरान उस कारखाने/स्थापना पर उक्त अधिनियम (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात " उक्त अवधि कहा गया है" ) प्रवर्तमान था ऐसी विवरणियां , ऐसे प्रारूप में और ऐसी विशिष्टियों सहित देगा जो कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा (साधारण) विनियम, 1950 के अधीन उसे उक्त अवधि की बाबत देनी अपेक्षित होती थी;

(5) निगम द्वारा उक्त कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम की धारा 45 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन नियुक्त किया गया कोई निरीक्षक या निगम का इस निमित्त प्राधिकृत कोई अन्यपदधारी;

[भाग II-खंड 3 ( ii) ]

6149

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 10, 2009/आश्विन18 , 1931

(i ) धारा 44 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन, उक्त अवधि की बाबत दी गई किसी विवरण की विशिष्टियों को सत्यापित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ;

अथवा

(ii) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ किकर्मचारी राज्य बीमा ( साधारण ) विनियम, 1950 द्वारा यथा अपेक्षित रजिस्टर और अभिलेख उक्त अवधि के लिए रखे गये थे या नहीं; या

(iii) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी, नियोजक द्वारा दिये गए उन फायदों को, जिसके फलस्वरूप इस अधिसूचना के अधीन छूट दी जा रही है, नकद में और वस्तुरूप में पाने का हकदार बना हुआ है या नहीं; या

(iv) यह अभिनिश्चित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि उस अवधिके दौरान, जब उक्त कारखाने के संबंध में अधिनियमके उपबंध प्रवृत्त थे, ऐसे किन्हीं उपबंधों काअनुपालन किया गया था या नहीं, निम्नलिखित कार्य करने के लिए सशक्त होगा:-

(क) प्रधान या आसत्र नियोजक से अपेक्षा करना कि वह उसे ऐसी जानकारी दे जिसे उपरोक्त निरीक्षक या अन्य पदधारी आवश्यक समझता है; अथवा (ख ) ऐसे. प्रधाम या आसन्न नियोजक के अधिभोगाधीन, किसी कारखाने, स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में किसी भी उचित समय पर प्रवेश करना और उसके प्रभारी से यह अपेक्षा करना कि वह व्यक्तियों के नियोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंधित ऐसे लेखा, बहियां और अन्य दस्तावेज , ऐसे निरीक्षक या अन्य पदधारी के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करें और उनकी परीक्षा करने दें या ऐसी जानकारी दें जिसे वे आवश्यक समझते हैं; या (ग) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक की, उसके अभिकर्ता या सेवक की, या ऐसे किसी व्यक्ति को, जो ऐसे कारखाने, स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में पाया जाए, यहविश्वास करने का युक्तियुक्त कारण है कि वह कर्मचारी है , परीक्षा करना; या (घ) ऐसे कारखाने, स्थापना , कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में रखे गए किसी रजिस्टर, लेखा, बही या अन्य दस्तावेज की नकल तैयार करना या उद्धरण लेना;

(ङ) यथानिर्धारित अन्य शक्तियों का प्रयोग करना ।

(6) विनिवेश/निगमीकरण के मामले में, प्रदत्त छूट स्वतः रद्द हो जाएगी और तब नए प्रतिष्ठान को छूट हेतु समुचित सरकार की अनुमति लेनी होगी ।

अनुसूची

स्थापना/कारखाने का नाम

क्रम संख्या

1. हिन्दुस्तान एंटीबायोटिक्स लिमिटेड, पिम्परी, पुणे 2. इंडियन फार्मर्स फर्टिलाइजर कोऑपरेटिव लिमिटेड (इफको ) , नई दिल्ली ( सभी इकाइयां तथा कार्यालय )

[संख्या एस-38014/48/2008- एस. एस.- I ] एस. डी. जेवियर, अवर सचिव स्पष्टीकरणज्ञापन

इस मामले में छूट को भूतलक्षी प्रभाव देना आवश्यक हो गया है क्योंकि छूट के आवेदन पर कार्यवाही करने में समय लगा । तथापि, यह प्रमाणित किया जाता है कि छूट को भूतलक्षी प्रभाव देने से किसी भी व्यक्तिके हित पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव नहीं पड़ेगा ।

New Delhi , the 25th September, 2009 S.O. 2814.-In exercise of the power conferred by section 88 read with section 91 -A of the Employees ' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees of factories/ establishments specified in the schedule from the operation ofthe saidAct for a period from 1-10-2008 to 30-9-2010 .

2. The above exemption is subject to the following conditions namely :---

(1) The aforesaid establishments wherein the employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the name and designations ofthe exempted employees ;

(2) Not withstanding this exemption , the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from which exemption granted by this notification operates;

(3) The contributions for the exempted period , if already paid, shall not be refundable;

(4) The employer ofthe said factory/ establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that factory was subject to the operation ofthe said Act (hereinafter referred as the said period) , such returns in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the Employees ' State Insurance (General ) Regulations , 1950;

6150

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 10 , 2009/ ASVINA 18 , 1931

(5) Any inspector appointed by the Corporation under Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 45 of the said ESI Act or other official of the Corporation authorized in this behalf by it , shall , for the purpose of:-

(i) Verifying the particulars contained in any returned submitted under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 44 for the said period; or

(ii) Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees ' State Insurance (General) Regulations , 1950 for the said period; or

( iii) Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in cash and kind being benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this notification; or

(iv) Ascertaining whether any of the provisions ofthe Act had been complied with during the period when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empowered to:

(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information ashe may consider necessary for the purpose of this Act; or (b) At any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment , office or other premises occupied by such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found in charge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine accounts , books and other documents relating to the employment of

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

personal and payment of wages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or

(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his agent or servant , or any person found in such factory , establishment , office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or (d) make copies ofor take extracts from any register , account book or other document maintained in such factory, establishment, office or other premises ,

(e) exercise such other powers as may beprescribed.

(6) In case of disinvestment/corporatization , the exemptiongranted shall become automatically cancelledand then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption.

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Name of theEstablishment/Factory 1. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. , Pimpri , Pune 2. IndianFarmers Fertilizer Coop . Ltd. ( IFFCO) , New Delhi (All Units & Offices)

[No. S-38014/48 /2008 - SS- 1 ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

Ithas become necessary to give retrospective effect to the exemption in this case as processing of the applications for exemption took time . However, it is certified that the grant of exemption with retrospective effect will not affect the interest of any body adversely .

Printed by the Manager , Govt . of India Press , Ring Road , Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi - 110054, 2009