This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

REGD . NO . D. L. (N) 04 /0007/2003-05 रजिस्ट्री सं० डी० एल० ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 43]

नई दिल्ली, अक्तूबर 18 अक्तूबर 24, 2009 , शनिवार/आश्विन26 कार्तिक 2 , 1931 No. 43] NEW DELHI , OCTOBER 18-OCTOBER 24, 2009 , SATURDAY/ ASVINA 26- KARTIKA 2 , 1931 इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके SeparatePaging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II- खण्ड 3- उप-खण्ड (ii) PART II-Séction 3-Sub -section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं StatutoryOrders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

(राजस्व विभाग)

कार्यालय , मुख्य आयुक्त , केन्द्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क अहमदाबाद, 2 सितम्बर , 2009 सं. 01 /2009-2010 सीमा शुल्क ( गै.टे. )

का.आ. 2895.-सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 152 के खण्ड ( क) के अंतर्गत जारी भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली की अधिसूचना सं. 33/94 सी.शु. (गै .टै. ) दिनांक 1 जुलाई, 1994 के साथ पठित यथा संशोधित अधिसूचना सं. 14/2002 सी. शु. (गै. टै. ) दिनांक 7वीं मार्च 2002 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैं, अजीत कुमार, मुख्य आयुक्त, केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क , अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र, एतद्वारा सीमा शुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत गुजरात राज्य के गांव वारसामेडी , तालुका अंजार , जिला कच्छ को भाण्डागारण स्टेशन के रूप में घोषित करता हूं ।

[फा.सं. वी/30-104/मु.आ.का./तक./2009/

अजीत कुमार , मुख्य आयुक्त

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department ofRevenue)

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

Ahmedabad, the 2nd September, 2009

No. 01 /2009-2010 Customs (N.Τ. )

S.O. 2895.-In exercise of the powers conferred vide Notification No. 33/94 CUS (N'T) dated 1st ofJuly, 1994 of the Government of India , Ministry ofFinance , Department ofRevenue , New Delhi , issued under Clause (a) ofSection 152 of the Customs Act, 1962, read with Notification No. 14/2002 CUS (NT) dated 7th March , 2002, as amended , I Ajit Kumar , Chief Commissioner of Central Excise , Ahmedabad Zone , hereby declare " village Varsamedi of Taluka Anjar , District Kutch in. the State ofGujarat, to be a Warehousing Station under Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962 .

[F.No. V/30-104/CCO /Tech/2009 ] AJIT KUMAR , Chief Commissioner 3689 Gl/ 2009

(6369 ) 6370

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

(वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2896.-बैंककारी विनियमन अधिनियम , 1949 ( 1949 का 10 ) की धारा 53 ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारत सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की सिफारिश पर, एतद्वारा , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 19 ( 2 ) के प्रावधान , बैंक आफ इंडिया पर लागू नहीं होंगे , जहां तक उनका संबंध , संयुक्त उद्यम कंपनी स्टार यूनियन डाई- ईची लाइफ इंश्योरेंस कंपनी लि. की चुकता शेयर पूंजी के 30 प्रतिशत से अधिक की शेयरधारिता से है ।

[फा.सं. 7/86/2007- बीओए) डी. डी. माहेश्वरी , अवर सचिव (Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi , the 5th October , 2009

S.O. 2896. -In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 53 ( 1 ) ofthe Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) , the Government of India, on the recommendations of Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of Section 19 (2) of the said Act shall not apply to Bank of India in so far as they relate to its holding of the shares in excess of30 % of the paid up share capital of the Joint Venture company- Star Union Dai - ichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

[F.No. 7 / 86/2007 - BOA]

D. D. MAHESHWARI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2897. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक अधिनियम , 1955 ( 1955 का 23 ) की धारा 21 क के साथ पठित धारा 21 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( ग ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार , भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक से परामर्श करके , एतद्वारा , श्री प्रदीप एस. जैन , निवासी- फलैट् सं. 1104/1101 , इन्द्र टावर , गोखले रोड , दादर ( दक्षिण ) , मुम्बई को अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक जो भी पहले हो , भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के मुम्बई स्थानीय बोर्ड के एक सदस्य के रूप में नामित करती है ।

(फा. सं. 9/ 11/2008 - बीओ-1 ]

एस. गोपाल कृष्ण , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 14th October, 2009

S.O. 2897. -In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( c) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 21 , read with Section 21A of the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955) , the Central Government , in consultation with Reseve Bank of India , hereby nominates Shri Pradeep S. Jain , resident of Flat No. 1104/1101 , Inder Tower Gokhle Road , Dadar ( South ) Mumbai , to be a member of the Mumbai Local Board of the State Bank of India for a period of three years , from the date of notification or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

[ F. No. 9 / 11 /2008 -BO- 1 ]

S. GOPAL KRISHNA , Under Secy .

स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यऔर परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2898.-दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते एतदद्वारा हुए , केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय दन्त चिकित्सा परिषद से परामर्श करने के पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है ; अर्थात्ः

2. महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक द्वारा प्रदत्त दंत चिकित्सा अर्हताओं को मान्यता दिए जाने के संबंध में, दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 60 के 1 के सामने स्तंभ 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में नायर हास्पिटल डेंटल कालेज , मुम्बई के संबंध में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां उसके अंतर्गत अन्तः स्थापित की जाएंगी: -

" दन्त शल्य चिकित्सा निष्णात

प्रोस्थोडोन्टिक्स

एम डी एस (प्रोस्थो. ) महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक ( यदि यह 25-06-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । ) 6371 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

ओरल मेडिसिन

एम डी एस (ओरल मेडिसिन ) महाराष्ट्रस्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय ,

नासिक

(यदि यह 11-7-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

पेरियोडान्टिक्स

एम डी एस ( पेरियो. ) महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक

(यदि यह 09-7-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ।)

ओरल सर्जरी

एम डी एस ( ओरल सर्जरी ) महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , नासिक

(यदि यह 08-7-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

कंजरवेटिव डेंटिस्ट्री

एम डी एस ( कन, डेंटिस्ट्री ) महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय ,

नासिक

(यदि यह 07-7-2009 को या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

[सं. वी. 12018/ 1/2009 -डी ई ] आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (Department ofHealth and Family Welfare) New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2898.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) of Section 10 ofthe Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948), the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby make the following amendments in Part-I ofthe Schedule of the Act, namely :-

2.-In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 , against I of Serial No. 60 in respect of Nair Hospital Dental College , Mumbai, in Part- I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :- "Master ofDental Surgery

MDS (Prostho. ), Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik Prosthodontics (ifgranted orn or after 25-06-2009) OralMedicine

MDS (Oral Med. ) , Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik (ifgranted on or after 11-07-2009 )

MDS (Perio. ), Maharashtra University of Health Sciences , Nashik Periodontics (ifgranted on or after 09-07-2009)

MDS (Oral Surgery), Maharashtra University ofHealth Sciences , Nashik OralSurgery (ifgranted on or after 08-07-2009)

MDS (Cons . Dent. ) , Maharashtra University ofHealth Sciences , Nashik " Conservative Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 07-07-2009 )

[No. V. 12018/ 1 /2009 -DE] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 12 अक्तूबर, 2009

का.आ. 2899.-भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में और नागालैंड सरकार से परामर्श करने के बाद डॉ. एस. इम्कांग तुशी एओ सचिव , भारतीय रेड क्रास सोसाइटी, नागालैंड शाखा, कोहिमा को 2 सितम्बर , 2009 से पांच वर्षों के लिए भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् के सदस्य के रूप में मनोनीत किया गया है । अतःअब, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के उपबंध के अनुसरण में, केन्द्र सरकार एतद्वारा भारत सरकार के तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्यमंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी , 1960 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 138 में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्: - उक्तअधिनियम की धारा में " धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खण्ड ( क ) के अधीन मनोनीत " शीर्षक के अंतर्गत क्रम संख्या 17 और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टियों के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां प्रतिस्थापित की जाएंगी , अर्थात : -

नागालैंड सरकार "

" 17. डॉ. एस इम्कांग तुशी एओ

सचिव,

भारतीय रेड क्रास सोसाइटी नागालैंड शाखा कोहिमा

[सं. वी. - 11013 /13/2009 - एम. ई. ( नीति-1 ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव 6372

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 12th October, 2009

S.O. 2899. - Whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of clause ( a) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the IndianMedical Council Act, 1956 ( 102 of 1956 ) and in consultation with the Government of Nagaland have nominated Dr. S. Imkong Tushi Ao , Secretary, Indian Red Cross Society, Nagaland Branch , Kohima to be a member of the Medical Council of India for five years with effect from 2nd September , 2009 .

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub - section ( 1) of Section 3 of the said Act , the Central Government herebymakes the following further amendment in the Notification ofthe Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S. O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960 , namely:--

Inthe said Notification , under the heading , "Nominated under clause ( a ) of sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 " , for serial number 17 and the entries thereto, the following entries shall be substituted , namely :--

"17.

Government of Nagaland "

Dr. S. Imkong Tushi Ao Secretary, Indian Red Cross Society Nagaland Branch Kohima- 797001

[No. V. - 11013 / 13/2009- ME ( P- I ) ] R. SANKARAN , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2900.-केन्द्र सरकार भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उपधारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद एतद्द्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन अर्हता की नामावली में परिवर्तन के कारण करती है, अर्थात्:-

उक्त अनुसूची में

" पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय " के सामने शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके आगे स्तंभ ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत और शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण' [ इसके आगे स्तंभ ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि और उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अन्तःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात:-

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( संवेदनाहरण )

एमडी(संवेदनाहरण)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तरचिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( जीव रसायन विज्ञान )

एमडी( जीव रसायन विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( त्वचा विज्ञान )

एमडी(त्वचाविज्ञान)

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षाऔर अनुसंधान संस्थान, चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (सामान्य चिकित्सा)

एमडी(सामान्य चिकित्सा)

४

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( सूक्ष्म जीव विज्ञान )

एमडी ( सूक्ष्म जीव विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( प्रसूति विज्ञान और स्त्री रोग विज्ञान ) एमडी ( प्रसूति विज्ञान और स्त्री रोग विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) 6373 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

एमडी ( बाल चिकित्सा )

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( बाल चिकित्सा)

एमडी (मनश्चिकित्सा)

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( मनश्चिकित्सा)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । ) डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (विकृत विज्ञान ) .

एमडी (विकृतविज्ञान)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान संस्थान , चंड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में या उससे पहले प्रदान की गई हो । )

एमडी ( भेषजगुण विज्ञान )

डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( भेषजगुण विज्ञान )

एमडी (विकिरण निदान)

एम. डी. ( रेडियाथेरेपी )

" आयुर्विज्ञान वाचस्पति ( रेडियाथेरेपी ) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , चंड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । ).

एम. एस. ( जनरल सर्जरी )

" शल्य चिकित्सा निष्जात ( जनरल सर्जरी ) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान , चंड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । ) "शल्य चिकित्सा निष्जात (विकलांग विज्ञान) "

एम. एस. (विकलांग विज्ञान )

" शल्य चिकित्सा निष्जात ( नेत्र विज्ञान ) "

एम. एस. ( नेत्र विज्ञान )

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी यदि यह स्नातकोत्तर चिकित्सा शिक्षा एवं अनुसंधान संस्थान, चंड़ीगढ़ में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे छात्रों के संबंध में पंजाब विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा 1994 में अथवा उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो । )

एम. एस. (ईएनटी)

" शल्य चिकित्सा निष्जात ( कर्ण नासा कंठ विज्ञान ) "

[सं. यू. 12012/920 /2009 - एम ई (पी. II ]

आर. शंकरन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi, the 13th October, 2009

S.O. 2900. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (2) ofthe Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India, hereby makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , due to change of nomenclature of the qualification namely:-- In the said Schedule-

(a) against "Punjab University " under the heading ' Recognised Medical Qualification ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] , the following shall be inserted, namely :-

6374

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II--SEC. 3(ii )] 2

MD(Anaesthesia)

"Doctor of Medicine (Anaesthesia) "

(This shall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh on or before 1994:

" Doctor ofMedicine (Biochemistry) "

MD(Biochemistry)

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Dermatology) "

MD (Dermatology)

"Doctor ofMedicine (General Medicine) "

MD(General Medicine )

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Microbiology) "

MD(Microbiology)

MD (Obst . & Gynae . )

"Doctor of Medicine ( Obstetrics & Gynaecology) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh onorbefore 1994 .

MD(Paediatrics .)

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Paediatrics) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when grantedby Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh onorbefore 1994 .

MD (Psychiatry. )

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Psychiatry) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh on orbefore 1994 .

MD(Pathology. )

"Doctor of Medicine ( Pathology) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh on or before 1994.

MD(Pharmacology )

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Pharmacology) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh onorbefore 1994 .

MD (Radiodiagnosis)

"Doctor ofMedicine ( Radiodiagnosis )"

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh on or before 1994.

MD ( Radiotherapy)

"Doctor of Medicine ( Radiotherapy) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh on or before 1994 .

6375 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

MS(General Surgery)

"Master of Surgery( General Surgery) "

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Punjab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research , Chandigarh onor before 1994 .

MS(Orthopaedics)

"Master of Surgery ( Orthopaedics)"

(Thisshall be a recognised medical qualification when granted by Purijab University in respect of students being trained at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh onor before 1994 .

MS(Ophthalmology)

"Master of Surgery ( Ophthalmology) ".

MS (ENT)

"Master of Surgery ( Otorynolryngology) "

[No. U. 12012/920/2009- ME(P.II )

R. SANKARAN , Under Secy.

पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2901 , केन्द्रीय सरकार , राजभाषा ( संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग ) नियम , 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम ( 4 ) के अनुसरण में पर्यावरण एवं वन मंत्रालय के अधीन निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों , जिनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधन ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है , को अधिसूचित करती है :-

1 . भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , मुख्यालय , सी. जी.ओ. काम्प्लैक्स , सॉल्ट लेक, कोलकाता-700064

2. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , उत्तरी क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र, 192 , कौलागढ़ रोड, देहरादून , 248195

3. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण, पश्चिमी क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र , कोरेगांव रोड, पुणे-411001

4. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , मध्य क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र , 10 चैथम लाइंस, इलाहाबाद-211002

5. भारतीय वनस्पति संर्वेक्षण , शुष्क अंचल क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र, पो -नंदनवन , जोधपुर-342008

6. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , अंडमान एवं निकोबार क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र , पोर्ट ब्लेयर-744102

7. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , सिक्किम हिमालयी क्षेत्रीय केन्द्र, पो- राजभवन, गंगटोक 737103

8. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , भारतीय गणराज्य वनस्पति उद्यान, नोयडा, उत्तर प्रदेश

9. भारतीय वनस्पति सर्वेक्षण , औद्योगिक अनुभाग , भारतीय संग्रहालय , सदर स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700016,

[सं. ई-11014/ 1 / (9 )2009- रा.भा. (का ) ]

डॉ. बी. पी . नीलरत्न , संयुक्त सचिव

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2009

S. O. 2901. -In pursuance of sub - rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages ( Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules , 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices under the administrative control ofthe Ministry of Environment and Forests , the 80% staff whereof have acquired a working knowledge of Hindi :-

1. Botanical Survey of India, ( Headquarters ) , CGO Complex ; Salt Lake , Kolkata- 700064.

2. Botanical Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, 192 Kaulagarh Road , Dehradun- 248195 .

3. Botanical Survey of India , Western Regional Centre , Koregaon Road , Pune-411001 .

4. Botanical Survey of India , Central Regional Centre , 10 Chaitham Lines , Allahabad- 211002 . 5. Botanical Survey of India , Arid Zone Regional Centre , Post -Nandanvan , Jodhpur- 342008 .

6. Botanical Survey of India , Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre , Port Blair - 744102 .

7. Botanical Survey of India, Sikkim Himalayan Regional Centre , Post - Raj Bhawan Gangtok -737103 .

8. Botanical Survey of India , Botanical Garden of Indian Republic, Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

9. Botanical Survey of India, Industrial Section , National Museum , Sadar Street , Kolkata- 700016 . ,

[No. E 11014/1 (9)/2009-OL ( 1 ) ] Dr. B. P. NILARATNA, Jt . Secy.

6376

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART I-SEC.3( ii) ] उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2902.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स भारत सेल्स कॉर्पोरेशन , कलांवाली 125 201 , जिला सिरसा ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " बीएससीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लैंडमार्क " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/137 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

LandMark

स्टाम्प और सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट में काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और इन दोनों छेदों को लीड वायर से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गयाहै ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 *, 5× 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 53 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6377 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs)

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2902. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top Type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " BSCT" and with brand name "LANDMARK" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Bharat Sales Corporation , Kalanwali- 125 201 , Distt- Sirsa (Haryana) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 137;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a miximum capacity of30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

LandMark

Fromthe right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (53 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3689 G1 /09-2 6378

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II -SEC: 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2903.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स भारत सेल्स कॉर्पोरेशन , कलांवाली-125201 , जिला सिरसा , ( हरियाणा ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " बीएससीपी" श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " लैंडमार्क " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 / 138 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सर्किट और मैकिनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है। उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 53 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6379 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2903.-Whereas the Central Govemment, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " BSCP " and withbrand name " LANDMARK" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Bharat Sales Corporation, Kalanwali - 125 201 , Distt- Sirsa ( Haryana ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 138 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg and minimum capacity of 1 kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure2-Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead and seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . up to 5000kg , with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (53 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6380

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2904.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 (1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स नीलांचल इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेइंग कं. , जलपाई मोरे , बुर्दवान रोड, सिलीगुडी-734 005 ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( पृथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टीईसीके " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तिस्ता" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/ 217 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

16857

III 30T 100kg 5kg

इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर तार के साथ स्टाम्पिग प्लेट लगाई गई है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है , स्केल की बाडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 100 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा..सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 98 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6381

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2904. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type - conversion kit type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " TECK " and with brand name " TEESTA " (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Nilanchal Electronic Weighing Co. Jalpai More , Burdwan Road , Siliguri - 734 005 (W.B. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/217;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type- conversion kit type ) with a miximum capacity of 30 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

1085

III 30T 100kg 5kg

Figure3 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on two side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passingfrom the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine forfraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate ofapproval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 5 tonne and up to 100 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10% , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM -21 (98)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6382

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II--SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त , 2009

का.आ. 2905.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स नीलांचल इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेइंग कं. जलपाई मोरे , बुर्दवान रोड , सिलीगुडी-734005 ( पश्चिमी बंगाल ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " टीईडब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " तिस्ता " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/218 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

III 40t 200kg 10kg

ULUSEA

इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर तार के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट लगाई गई है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है , स्केल की बाडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (98 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6383 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2905. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is' satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series " TEWB " and with brand name "TEESTA" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Nilanchal Electronic Weighing Co. Jalpai More , Burdwan Road, Siliguri - 734 005 ( W.B. ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/218;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type) with a miximum capacity of 40 tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

0t 200kg 10kg

Figure3 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on two side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passesing from the body of scale with the lead seal. Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 ( 98 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6384

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2906.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकारे , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सागर वेइंग सिस्टम , प्लाट नं. एफ -7 , राज विहार कालोनी , जमालपुर रोड, जागीतपुर, हरिद्वार द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यू एस डब्ल्यू-6 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SWS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/104 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SWS

एक वायर के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट इंडीकेटर की दायीं तरफ है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट है , स्केल की बाडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकन के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी कलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के ,के, 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 47 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6385 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2906. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "SWSW- 6 " and with brand name "SWS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . Sagar Weighing System, Plot No. F - 7, Raj Vihar Colony , Jamalpur Road, Jagieetpur , Haridwar and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/104;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument with a miximum capacity of60tonne and minimum capacity of200 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 10kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

SWS

Figure 2: Sealingarrangement

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on right side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passesing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 %, 2 × 10 % or 5 × 10% , where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 (47)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 3689 G1/09-3 6386

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II- SEC . 3( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2907.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सागर वेइंग सिस्टम , प्लाट नं. एफ -7 , राज विहार कालोनी , जमालपुर रोड , जागीतपुर , हरिद्वार द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एस डब्ल्यूएस पी -7 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " SWS " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/105 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि. ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 , 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्यके समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 47 )/2009 ]

आर. माधुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6387 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

New Delhi, the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2907. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non-automatic weighing instrurnent (Plateform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " SWSP - 7 " andwith brand name " SWS" (hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M/s. Sagar Weighing System, Plot No. F -7 , Raj Vihar Colony , Jamalpur Road , Jagieetpur, Haridwar and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/105 ;

ThesaidModel is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

0000

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 ×10k, where k is apositive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (47)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6388

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2908.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा (7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स पी एम एस सोफ्ट इन्फो टैक्नोलोजी प्रा. लि. , 307 , रॉयल वर्ल्ड एस सी रोड , जयपुर -1 ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एनडब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " न्यूवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/ 232 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 40 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

NEWWAY

CLASS,III

200-ko

Μ. 40

10kg

तार स्केल की बाडी में से लीड सील के साथ इस तरफ निकाला गया है कि इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर दोनों तरफ तार द्वारा स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर सीलिंग प्वांइट लगाया गया है । तोलन मशीन को कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की गई है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत, डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के. समतुल्यहैं ।.

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 108 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6389

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक2, 1931

[ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi, the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2908.- Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval ofModels ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge -type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of series " NWB " andwith brand name " NEWWEIGH" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s . PMS SOFT INFO TECHNOLOGY P. LTD . , 307 , Royal World S.C. Road, Jaipur - 1 (Raj .) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 232;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with a miximum capacity of 40 tonnes and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

NEWWAY

HERWAY

2200 κα

MAX 40 t

10 kg

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on two side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing - shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonnes and up to 200 tonnes with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM-21 (108)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director ofLegal Metrology 6390

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II--SEC. 3(ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2909.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स पी एम एस सोफ्ट इन्फो टैक्नोलोजी प्रा. लि. , 307 , रॉयल वर्ल्ड एस सी रोड , जयपुर -1 ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 111 ) वाले " एनडब्ल्यूटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " न्यूवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी /09/09/233 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत त्र्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 बोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MFG: PMS SOFT INFO TECHNOLOGY

JAIPUR ( RAJ )

BRAND : NEW WEIGH

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और "ई" मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 108) /2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6391

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2909.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " NWT " and with brand name "NEW WEIGH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . PMS SOFT INFO TECHNOLOGY P. LTD. , 307 , Royal World S.C. Road , Jaipur- 1 (Raj ) which is assigned the approval mark IND /09 /09/233 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop Type) with a maximum capacity of30 kg and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verfication scale interval (e ) is 5g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative cürrent power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

MFG : PMS SOFT INFO TECHNOLOGY

JAIPUR ( RAJ )

BRAND : NEW WEIGH

Figure -2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has extemal control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to extemal calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section ( 12) ofSection 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weigting instruments of similar make, accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with veification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg to 2 g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM- 21 ( 108)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6392

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2910, केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स पी एम एस सोफ्ट इन्फो टैक्नोलोजी प्रा. लि. , 307 , रॉयल वर्ल्ड एस सी रोड , जयपुर-1 ( राजस्थान ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एनडब्ल्यूपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "न्यूवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/09/234 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर के दोनों तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है। उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 के , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 108 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6393

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2910. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( Accuracy class - III ) of series "NWP " and with brand name "NEW WEIGH " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . PMS SOFT INFO TECHNOLOGY P. LTD. , 307, Royal World S.C. Road, Jaipur - 1 (Raj ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/234;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( é) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power, supply.

JAIPUR RAJ

Figure- 2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

From the both side of the indicator two holes are made by cuting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 1x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM -21 ( 108 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3689 GI/094 6394

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त , 2009

का. आ. 2911.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल (नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेटेक्स इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिस्टम , 59 , हिमगिरी कालोनी , वाटर टैंक के पास , कंथ रोड , मुरादाबाद -244001 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " डब्ल्यूईटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एमटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/241 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्टऔर 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्टाम्पऔर सीलिंग के सत्यापन के लिए तुला के दायीं तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट में काटकर छेदों में से लीडिड सीलिंग वायर निकालकर दो बोरेड स्क्रू से कसा गया है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 112 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6395 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2911.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority. is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of High accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " WET" and with brand name " AMTEK " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Weitex Electonics Systems , 59, Himgiri Colony, Near Water Tank, Kanth Road, Moradabad - 244001 (UP) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/241;.

The said model is a strain gauge type load cel ! based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Tabletop Type ) with amaximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

TEK

Figure-2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

On the right side of the balance two bored screws are fastened by a leaded sealing wire, passing under the outer cover and bottom plate, for receiving stamp and seal . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred.by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilarmake, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of100 to 50,000 for ' e' value of Img: to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for " e" value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10% , 2x10 or 5x10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM - 21 ( 112)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6396

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

नईदिल्ली, 28 अगस्त , 2009

का. आ. 2912. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स वेटेक्स इलेक्ट्रोनिक सिस्टम , 59 , हिमगिरी कालोनी , वाटर टैंक के पास , कंथ रोड , मुरादाबाद-244001 ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम ` यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूईपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एमटेक " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडलं कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/242 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 : सीलिंग प्रावधान

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट के दायीं तरफ लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बित्रा नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमाडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई" मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5× 10 के, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 112 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6397 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2912.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central.Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " WEP " and with brand name " AMTEK " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Weitex Electonics Systems , 59, Himgiri Colony, Near Water Tank, Kanth Road Moradabad - 244001 ( UP) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 /09 /242;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2: Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Lead seal is affixed on the right side of the stamping plate for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to aviod fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card /mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k or 5x 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM- 21 ( 112)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6398

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2913.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल ( 1 ) प्रा. लि. , 3 , पुष्पांजलि , गऊशला लेन , मलाड ( ई ) , मुंबई -400097 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 111 ) वाले " सीटीएल -20 बी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( शिशु तोलन मशीन ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटीजन " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/213 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( शिशु तोलन मशीन ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण बैटरी से परिचालित होता है ।

Sealing

आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

स्केल के पिछली तरफ छेद करके और इन दो छेदों में से सिलिंग वायर निकालकर सीलिंग की जाती है । स्टाम्पिग के लिए स्केल की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर लीड सील सहित निकाल कर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट को जोड़ा जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में कलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 84) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6399 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th . August, 2009

S.O. 2913.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Baby Weighing Machine) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of series " CTL 20B " andwith brand name " CITIZEN " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Citizen Scale (1 ) Pvt . Ltd. , 3, Pushpanjali, Gaushala Lane , Malad(E) , Mumbai -400097 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/213 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument ( (Baby Weighing Machine) with a maximum capacity of 20kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode Display ( LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on Batteries .

Sealing

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

sealing is done through the hole , made in the back side of plate of the scale , and then sealing wire is passed through these two holes. Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of the scale with lead seal , to get the stamiing. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card / mother board todisable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighting instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with veification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of lx10k, 2x10 or 5x10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM- 21 (84 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6400

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2914. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सिटीजन स्केल ( 1 ) प्रा. लि. , 3 , पुष्पांजलि , गऊशाला लेन, मलाड ( ई ) , मुंबई -400097 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एचएस बी 200 पी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन- टिकट प्रिंटिंग या इसके बिना ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सिटीजन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 / 212 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( व्यक्ति तोलन मशीन टिकट प्रिंटिंग या इसके बिना ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है। इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

500

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

इंडीकेटर के पिछली तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 कि. ग्रा. से अधिक और 400 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के , 2× 10 के , 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. - डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 84 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6401 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2914.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Person Weighing Machine - with or without ticket printing ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - 1II ) of series " HSB 200P " and with brand name " CITIZEN " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) . manufactured by M/ s. Citizen Scale (I ) Pvt . Ltd. , 3 , Pushpanjalí, Gaushala Lane , Malad ( E) , Bumbai - 400097 which is assigned the approval mark IND /09/ 09/212 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( ( Electronic Person Weighing Machine ) with a maximum capacity of 200kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Liquid Crystal Diode Display ( LCD) Display indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

From the rear side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity in the range of 100kg . to 400kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of lx10k , 2x10k or 5x10 % , where k'is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

No.-WM -21 (84)/2009]

R. MATHUR.BOOTHAM, Directo . of Legal Metrology 3689 G1/09-5 6402

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2, 1931

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का. आ. 2915.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार,उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप -धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स अगरसेन डिजीटल स्केल्स, शोप नं. 7 , केवडा बाडी बस स्टैण्ड रायगढ़ -496001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एटीटी 11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ऐन्कर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 09/208 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

ANCHOR

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ आऊटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सोल से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता। मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी कंलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को राकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2× 10 के, 5× 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मकं या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 91 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6403 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2915.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III) of series "ATT 11 " and with brand name " ANCHOR " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/s . Shree Agarsen Digital Scales , Shop No. 7, Kewda Badi Bus Stand, Raigarh - 496001 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/208;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g. The verification scale interval (e ) is 5g: It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) Display indicates the weighing result: The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

ANCHOR Figure- 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire titrough these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and perforinance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with veri fication scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for 'e ' value of5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5x10 % , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. - WM - 21 (91 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director ofLegal Metrology 6404

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ,

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2916.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम . 987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स श्री अगरसेन डिजीटल स्केल्स , शोप नं. 7 , केवडा बाडी बस स्टैण्ड, रायगढ़ -496001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एपीएफ -5 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ऐन्कर " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/209 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

A6861

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमत! 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा के लिए स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील के छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल कोसीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य केसमतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 91 )/ 2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6405 [ भाग II-खण्ड: 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2916.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (PlatformType ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " APF - 5 " and with brand name "ANCHOR" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Shree Agarsen Digital Scales , Shop No. 7 , Kewda Badi Bus Stand, Raigarh -496001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/209;

A6861

Figure-2Sealing provision of the indicator of model

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300 kg and minimum capacity of 1kg. The verification scale interval (e ) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument. The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The Instrument has externmal control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/monther board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg up to 5000kg with veification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of lx10k, 2x10 or 5x 10% , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same meterials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM - 21 ( 91 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6406

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II -SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2917.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और पधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स श्री अगरसेन डिजीटल स्केल्स , शोप नं. 7 , केवडा बाडी बस स्टैण्ड , रायगढ़-496001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एडब्ल्यूबी -5 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेव्रिज टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ऐन्कर" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /09 /210 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल के इंडीकेटर का सीलिंग प्रावधान

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडीकेटर की बाडी पर दोनों तरफ तार के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट लगाई गई है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट लगाया गया है , स्केल की बाडी में से वायर निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (91 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6407 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2917.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Weighbridge Type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " AWB - 5 " and with brand name " ANCHOR " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Since Agarsen Digital Scales , Shop No. 7, Kewda Badi Bus Stand , Raigarh - 496001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/210 ;

Figure-3 Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verfication scale interval (e ) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on both side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passesing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The Instrument has externmal control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/monther board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate ofapproval of the said model shall also cover the weighting instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with veification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same meterials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM- 21 ( 91 )/2009 ]

R. MATHUR BOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6408

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2918.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सनराइज इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. 518 , सैक्टर-4, गंगयाल , जम्मू-180010 ( जे एंड के ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " एसईटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलाइट " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/201 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

0000

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 20 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई" मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 (80 )/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6409 [ भाग 11 खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August , 2009

S.O. 2918.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class - II) of series "SET" and with brand name " ELITE " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Sunrise Industries, Plot No.518, Sector-4, Gangyal , Jammu - 180010 (J& K) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/201 ;

0000

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of theModel

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-authomatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 20kg and minimum capacity of 100g. The verfication scale interval (e) is 2g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate a fastenedby a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighting instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg , with veification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for (e) value of 100mg or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zeromanufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

IF.No. WM -21 ( 80)/2009]

R. MATHUR BOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 3689 G1 /09-6 6410.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2919.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बांट और, माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सनराइज इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. 518 , सैक्टर-4, गंगयाल , जम्मू-180010 ( जे एंड के ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसआईटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/202 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

> उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपद‌र्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 80 ) /2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6411 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi ,. the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2919. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , issatisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " SIT " and with brand name "ELITE" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ), manufacturedby M/s . Sunrise Industries , Plot No. 518 , Sector-4, Gangyal , Jammu - 180010 ( J& K) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/202;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non-authomatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verfication scale interval (e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure -2 Schematic diagram of the sealing provision of the Model

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be openedwithouttampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg . with veification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g. and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ( e) value of5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x 10% , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same meterials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (80 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6412

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 28 अगस्त, 2009

का.आ. 2920.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 (1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स सनराइज इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. 518 , सैक्टर-4, गंगयाल , जम्मू-180010 ( जे एंड के ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसईपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " इलाइट " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कह गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/203 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 300 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशतं व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काट कर दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेडछाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 500 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 80 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6413 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 28th August, 2009

S.O. 2920. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) ofSection 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) ofseries "SEP" and with brand name "ELITE" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ), manufactured by M/s : Sunrise Industries, Plot No. 518 , Sector-4, Gangyal, Jammu - 180010 ( J&K) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 09/203 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 300kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts, 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure - 2 Sealing provision of the indicator of Model

Fromthe right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator/ can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A /D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval ofthe said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM -21 (80)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6414

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2921. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जे.एम. काटावाला , लोहा ओली , इतवारी , नागपुर-440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले " जेएमटी II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एकवे " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन- डी/09/ 09/228 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है । उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 220 ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 0.2 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल (ई ) 0.01 ग्रा है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

JM Katawala NAGPUR ACWAY

Max . Ma Vil

20Kg. 50 g

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 के, 2×10 के , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 95 ) /2009] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6415 [भाग II- खण्ड' 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September, 2009

S.O. 2921. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accuracy class II) of series " JM- TII " and with brand name " ACWAY " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufacturedby M/s . J.M. Katawala, Loha Oli , Itwari , Nagpur- 440002 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/228 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type ) with a maximum capacity of 220g and minimum capacity of0.2g . The verification scale interval (e) is 0.01g. Ithas a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

JM Katawala

NAGPUR

ACWAY

Max Mini . ' e ' Valus Class

20 Kg . B

Figure- 2 Schematic diagram ofthe sealing provision of the Model

From the right side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leacied wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal. The weighing scale can not be opened withouttampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother boardto disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracyand performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg , with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img . to 50 mg. and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10k or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F.No. WM -21 (95 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6416

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 25 सितम्बर , 2009

का.आ. 2922.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 7 ) और उपधारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स जे. एम्. काटावाला , लोहा ओली, इतवारी , नागपुर -440002 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " जेएम - टी III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित, अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाय टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " एकवे " है (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 229 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदेश तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

वेइंग स्केल के दायीं तरफ आउट कवर और तल प्लेट काट कर, दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन.) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 के , 2 × 10 के, 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 95 ) /2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6417 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2922.- Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class III ) of series " JM-T III " and with brand name "ACWAY" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . J.M. Katawala Loha Oli Itwari , Nagpur- 440002 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/229;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Tabletop type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply .

30Kg..00g

Max

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of the sealing provision oftheModel

From the right side of the weighing scale two holes are made by cutting the out cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The weighing scale can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ Dcard/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 ofthe said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg : with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg. to 2g. and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of Ix10k , 2x10k or 5x10 % , where k is a positive or fnegative whole nümber or equal to zeromanufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the ame materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F, No. WM-21 (95 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHÁM , Director of Legal Metrology 3689 G1 /09-7 6418

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 9 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2923. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म सहित कनवर्सन किट प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TACWA

इंडिकेटर के पिछली तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर , दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और सील प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद क के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड मदर बोर्ड में डिप भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्यहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 (95)/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6419 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 9th October , 2009

S.O. 2923. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Plateform with conversion kit type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "JM -P kit III " and with brand name " ACWAY" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . J.M. Katawala , Loha Oli , Itwari , Nagpur -440 002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/230;

The saidmodel is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform with conversion kittype) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg and minimum capacity of Ikg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply,

Figure- 1 Model

ACWAY

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of Model

From the rear side ofthe indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two- holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Govemment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg , and up to 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x 10k, 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No. W M -21 ( 95 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6420

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 9 अक्तूबर, 2009

का. आ. 2924. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृत्ति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडिकेटर के पिछली तरफ आउटर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर, दो छेद किए गए हैं और सत्यापन स्टाम्प और प्राप्त करने के लिए इन दो छेदों के जरिए लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । उपकरण को शील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायंग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

गया है । उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के 'तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से अधिक और 5000 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 95 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 6421 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

New Delhi , the 9th October , 2009

S.O. 2924. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weight and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to rerider accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub- sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Plate form type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class- III ) of series " JM - P III " and with brand name " ACWAY " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M /s . J.M. Katawala , Loha Oli , Itwari , Nagpur-440002 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/231 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of Model

From the rear side of the indicator two holes are made by cutting the outer cover and bottom plate and fastened by a leaded wire through these two holes for receiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighting instruments ofsimilar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg, and up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 1000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM- 21 (95 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6422

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

नई दिल्ली , 9 अक्तूबर, 2009

का. आ. 2925.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स अपोलो इंफ्राटेक प्रा. लि. , अहमदाबाद मेहसाना इंटरस्टेट हाइवे विलेज , राजपुर पिन -382740 , जिला मेहसाना ( गुजरात ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता वर्ग 2 वाले " पी टी पी " श्रृंखला के डिस्कंटिन्युअस टोटलाइजिंग स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टोटलाइजिंग हुपर व्हीयर ) अंकक सूचन सहित , के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " अपोलो ' हैं ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/400 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण-पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित डिस्कंटिन्युअस टोटलाइजिंग स्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टोटलाइजिंग हुपर व्हीयर) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमतां 10 कि. ग्रा. है । मापमान अंतराल ( डी) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

APO

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । स्केल की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट से जोड़ा गया है और स्टाम्पिंग के लिए विशेष स्क्रू पर दिए गए छेद पर लीड सील लगाई जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के सहित 500 कि.ग्रा . से 1000 कि.ग्रा तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5 ×10 *, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 209 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6423 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 9th October, 2009

S.O. 2925. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is In conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of Automatic weighing instrument Discontinuous Totalizing Automatic weighing instrument ( Totalizing Hopper Weigher) with digital indication of Accuracy class- Il of series " ATP " and with brand name " APOLLO " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s .Apollo Infratech Pvt . Ltd. , Ahmedabad Mehsana Interstate Highway, Village Raipur , Pin- 382740 Distt . Mehsana (Guj ) andwhich is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/09/400;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based authomatic weighing instrument Discontinuous Totalizing Automaticweighing instrument (Totalizing Hopper Weigher) with a maximum capacity of 500 kg . and minimum capacity of 10kg . The scale interval ( d) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 3 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

Scaling shall bedone to prevent opening the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Stamping plate is connected through sealing wire passing from the body of scale and hole provided at the special screw with the lead seal , to get the star ping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Ciovernment hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacities in the range of 500kg . to 1000kg . for ' e' value of 5g. or more and with ' e' value of 1x 10% , 2x 10k or 5x 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 209 )/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6424

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 9 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2926.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स डिनी एग्रो , डिनी एग्रो एस. आर. 1. डेला फिसिका 2041040 सपेज्जानो डीएल. फ्लोरनो - मोडेना , इटली द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता (यथार्थता वर्ग 11 ) वाले " 3590 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " डिनी एग्रो ' है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और इसके आयातक/ भारतीय प्रतिनिधि मैसर्स जय इंस्ट्रूमेंटस एंड सिस्टम प्रा. लि. ई-16 , एवरेस्ट बिल्डिंग , टारदेवो, मुंबई-400034 हैं और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/398 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमत्ता 600 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2.5 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

इंडिकेटर के दायीं तरफ लगभग 2 एमएम डायामीटर का स्टील का बारीक तार माउंटिंग स्क्रू में से और एक फिक्सिड ( रिजिड ) बोल्ट, जो कि इंडिकेटर इंक्लोजर का एक भाग है , में से निकाला जाता है । स्टैंडर्ड सीलिंग टूल द्वारा स्टील तार के अंतिम दोनों सिरों को दबाया जाता है , तब स्टील तार लगाई जाती है । सील तोड़े बिना इंडीकेटर को खोला नहीं जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है . विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 से 5,000 तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 . , 2× 10 *, 5 × 10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णाक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 150 )/ 2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6425

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 9th October , 2009

S.O. 2926. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standars of Weight and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now , therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of High accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " 3590 " and with brand name " DINI ARGEO" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufactured by M/s. Dini Argeo, Dini Argeo S.r.l. della Fisica 2041040. Spezzano di Florano - Modena, Italy and its importer/ Indian representative is M/s. Jay Instruments & Systems Pvt . Ltd. E- 16, Everest Building , Tardeo, Mumbai -400034 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/398 ;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with amaximum capacity of 600 kg . and minimum capacity of 2.5kg. The verfication scale interval (e ) is. 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retainèd tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure -2 Sealing provision of the indicator of Model

From the right side of the indicator thin steel thread of about 2mm diameter through one of the mounting screws and a fixed (rigid ) bolt which is part of the indicator enclosure . Pressing both ends of the steel threads using standard sealings tool then seals the steel thread . The indicator can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration. A din switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) ofSection 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said Model shall also cover the weighting instruments of similar make . accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg . with veification scafe. interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of Img. to 50mg . and with verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e' value of 100mg. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10 , 2 x 10 or 5 × 10 , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same meterials with which , the said approved Model has been inanufactured .

[ F.No. WM -21 ( 150 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3689 G1 /09-8 6426

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24. 2009 /KARTIKA 2. 1931

[PART 11 SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2927.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स जसुभाई इंजीनियरिंग प्रा. लि. , 64 /ए, जीआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट बटवा , अहमदाबाद -382445 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग रेफ X( 1 ) वाले " यूबीएम -85 " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग मशीन के माडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " JMHSI . " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 /08 /39 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिग इंस्ट्रूमेंट है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि.ग्रा. है । मापमान अंतराल " डी " का मान 10 ग्रा. है । इसकी अधिकतम भरण दर 8 फिल/मिनट है । मशीन को सीमेंट , चाय , मसाले , चीनी , चावल , नमक , सूजी , डिटरजेंट बीज , औषधियां पाउडर और कृषीय उत्पाद आदि फ्री फ्लोइंग को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 इंडीकेटर कं माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

इंडिकेटर के पिछले तरफ अपर कवर और तल प्लेट काटकर, छेद बनाया गया हैं स्टाम्प और सील को सत्यापन करने के लिए छेद को लीड तार से बांधा जाता है । इंडीकेटर को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना खोला नहीं जा सकता । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियमकी धारा 36 को उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त-माङल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित -माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जा 100 कि. ग्रग्रा. न्तक की क्षमता वालेहैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 05 )/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6427 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2009

S.O. 2927.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submittedto it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformitywith the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60, of 1976) and the Standars of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based automatic Gravimetric Filling Instrument . It has maximum capacity 50kg. and minimum capacity 10kg . The value of scale interval ' d ' is 10g . Its maximum fills rate 8 fill/minutes. The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like cement, tea, spicies , sugar, rice , salt, suji , detergents , seeds , pharmaceuticals powder and agricultural products etc. The Liquid Crystal Diode Display (LCD ) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , SüHertz alternative current power supply.

From the rear side of the indicator a holes is made by cutting the upper cover and bottom plate . This hole is fastened by a leaded wire for rceiving the verification stamp and seal . The indicator can not be opened without tempering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[ F.No. WM- 21 (05 )/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of 1.egal Metrology 6428

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC.3( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर, 2009

का. आ. 2928.-कंन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए ग्ग्वेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स जसुभाई इंजीनियरिंग प्रा. लि. , 64/ए, जीआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट वटवा , अहमदाबाद -382445 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग रेफ X( 1) वाले " ई पी जी " श्रृंखला के स्वचालित ग्रेविमेट्रिक फिलिंग मशीन के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " JMHSL " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09 /40 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक मैकेनीकल टाइप लीवर और बीम आधारित सेकैण्डरी स्टंडर्ड बलैंस ( मैकेनीकल इक्वी- आर्म टाइप ) उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 25 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 10 कि. ग्रा. है । मापमान अंतराल " डी" का मान 50 ग्रा. है । इसकी अधिकतम भरण दर 6 फिल/मिनट है । मशीन को सीमेंट , चाय , मसाले , चीनी , चावल , नमक , सूजी, डिटरजेंट, बीज , औषधियां पाउडर और कृषीय उत्पाद आदि फ्री फ्लोइंग को भरने के लिए डिजाइन किया गया है ।

आकृति-2 इंडीकेटर के माडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

स्केल के बीम पर सील लगायी गई है । स्टाम्प का सत्यापन बीम पर स्थिर है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित माडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 कि. ग्रा. तक की क्षमता वाले हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 05)/2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6429 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th October, 2009

S.O. 2928 Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Mechanical Gravimetric Filling machine belonging to Accuracy Class X( 1 ) of EPG ' series with brand " JMHSL " ( hereinafter referred to asthe said Model ) , manufactured by M /s . Jasubhai Engineering Pvt . Ltd. , 64 /A, GIDC Industrial Estate Vatva , Ahmedabad- 382445 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 09/40 ; роду колега вино The said model is a mechanical type lever and beam based secondary standard balance (Mechanical equi - arm type ) Instruments . It has maximum capaity 25 kg . and minimum capacity 10 kg. The value of scale interval ' d ' is 50 g . Its maximum fills rate 6 fill /minutes . The machine is designed for filling free flowing products like cement , tea , spaces , sügar, rice, salt, suji , detergents , seeds , pharmaceuticals powder and agricultural products etc.

JEPL

MHD

Figure-2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the Model

Aseal is provided on the beam of the scale. Verrification stamp will fixed on the beam . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

[F. No. WM -21 ( 05)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 6430

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART 11-SEC . 3 (ii) {

नई दिल्ली , 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2929.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के. पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स पाहवा इंडस्ट्रियल मैन्यूफेक्चरिंग कंपनी, एस सी ओ-12 , रायसेन रोड शोपिंग सेंटर , पिपलानी , सेक्टर - बी, बीएचईएल , भोपाल ( मध्य प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च ( यथार्थता वर्ग II ) वाले "ई सी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) के माडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " LEE " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/75 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( ई) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है। प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

LEE

SCALES

आकृति-2 मॉडल की सीलिंग का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए इंडीकेटर के दायीं तरफ लगी स्टाम्पिग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण्र में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुँच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है किउक्त माडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण-पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत. डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्तअनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि. ग्रा. 50 मि. ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन) 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई" मान 1 × 10 *, 2 ×10 *, 5 × 10 , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 36) /2009 ] आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6431 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2009

S.O. 2929. Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of high accuracy (Accurcy Class - II ) ofseries " ECS " and with brand name "LEE" (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/s . Pahwa Industrial Manufacturing Company , S.C.O.- 12 , Raisen road Shopping Centre , Piplani , Sec - B , BHEL Bhopal ( MP) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/ 75;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2 g . It has a tare devie with a 100 per cent substractie retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertiz alternative current power supply.

LEE SCALES

Figure-2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate which is attached in the right side of the indicator for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument cannot be opened without tampering the seal . A typical sche'natic diagram of sealing provision of a model is givn above.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act ; the Central Government herebydeclares that this certificate of approval of the said model shallalso cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50 kg , with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of100 to 5000 for ' e' value of Img . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of100 mg. or more and with ' e' value of 1x10% , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F.No. WM- 21 ( 36 )/2009 ]

R.MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6432

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART 11--SEC . 3 ( ii )]

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2930. केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है किउक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, मैसर्स पाहवा इंडस्ट्रियल मेन्यूफेक्चरिंग कंपनी , एस सी ओ -12 , रायसेन रोड शोपिंग सेंटर, पिपलानी , सेक्टर - बी, बीएचईएल , भोपाल ( मध्य प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " ई पी एस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम "LEE" है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह आई एन डी/09/09 / 76 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता । कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 माडल को सीलिंग का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

सर्किट और मैकेनिकल असेंबली की सुरक्षा और कपटपूर्ण व्यवहारों से रोकने के लिए इंडीकेटर के दायी तरफ लगी स्टाम्पिंग प्लेट पर लीड सील को लगाया जाता है । उपकरण की बाडी पर दिए गए छेदों के माध्यम से लीड और सील तार लगाकर सीलिंग की जा सकती है । उपकरण को सील से छेड़छाड़ किए बिना नहीं खोला जा सकता । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्तदिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्तमॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. से या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षामता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 *, 5× 10 * , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 36)/2009 ]

आर. माथुरबूथम, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6433 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2009

S.O. 2930.-Whereas the Central Government after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards ofWeights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules, 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series "EPS" and with brand name " LEE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model), manufactured by M /s . Pahwa Industrial Manufacturing Company, S.C.O. - 12, Raisen Road Shopping Centre , Piplani , Sec -B, BHEL, Bhopal ( MP) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/09/76;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg. and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-IModel

Figure-2 Sealing provision of the indicator of model

Lead seal is affixed on the stamping plate for the security of circuit and mechanical assembly to avoid fraudulent use . Sealing can be done by applying lead & seal wrire through the holes provided on the body of the instrument . The instrument can not be opened without tampering the seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision ofthe model is given above.

The instrument has external access to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise ofthe powers conferredby sub- section (12 ) of Section 36 ofthe said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg up to 5000kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 %, 2x10 or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the saíd approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (36)/2009]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM, Director of Legal Metrology 3689 G1/09-9 6434

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 13 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2931.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम, 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , मैसर्स पाहवा इंडस्ट्रियल मेन्यूफेक्चिरिंग कंपनी, एस सी ओ -12 , रायसेन रोड शोपिंग सेंटर , पिपलानी , सेक्टर - बी , बीएचईएल , भोपाल -462 022 (मध्य प्रदेश ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग III ) वाले " एफ एस डी-501 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित , अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज प्रकार ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " LEE " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/09/ 77 सममुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।.

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( वेब्रिज टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि. ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-2 मॉडल के इंडीकेटर का सीलिंग प्रावधान

एक वायर के साथ स्टाम्पिंग प्लंट इंडीकेटर की बाडी के दायीं तरफ है जिस पर सीलिंग प्वाइंट है, स्केल की बाडी में से इस प्रकार निकाला गया है जिस पर लीड सील है । कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार से तोलन उपकरण को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उपधारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से अधिक और 150 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षामता वाले है और " ई " मान 1 × 10 *, 2× 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 36) /2009]

आर. माथुरबूथम , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 6435 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 13th October , 2009

S.O. 2931. Whereas the Central Govemment after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, iş satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said Model is likely to maintain its accuracy over period of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred hy sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of series " FSD- 501 " and with brand name " LEE " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , manufactured by M/s.Pahwa Industrial Manufacturing Company , S.C.O. - 12 , Raisen Road Shopping Centre , Piplani , Sec - B, BHEL , Bhopal -462 022 (MP ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 /09/ 77;

The said Model is a strain gauge type load coil based non - authomatic weighing instrument ( Weighbridge Type) with a maximum capacity of 50 tonne and minimum capacity of 100kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 5kg . It has a tare devicewith a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 3 Sealing provision of the indicator ofModel

Sealing point is affixed on the stamping plate is fixed on right side body of the indicator with the wire , in such a way that the wire passing from the body of scale with the lead seal . Sealing shall done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the Model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 150 tonne with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5x10 % , where k is á positive or negative whole number or equal to zero manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[F.No. WM- 21 (36)/2009 ]

R. MATHURBOOTHAM , Director of Legal Metrology 6436

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

आदेश

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2932.-केन्द्रीय सरकार , भारतीय विधिक माप विज्ञान संस्थान नियम, 1980 के नियम 8 के उपनियम ( 2 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय विधिक माप विज्ञान संस्थान , रांची की सलाहकार समिति का पुनर्गठन करती है जो कि राजपत्र में इस आदेश के प्रकाशन की तारीख से निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों से मिलकर बनेगी , अर्थात:-

अध्यक्ष

1. सचिव , उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग

सदस्स

2. अपर सचिव या संयुक्त सचिव उपभोक्ता मामले विभांग

3. विधि मंत्रालय का प्रतिनिधि , शाखा सचिवालय , कोलकाता

4. राष्ट्रीय भौतिक प्रयोगशाला के निदेशक का प्रतिनिधि, नई दिल्ली

5. भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो के महानिदेशक का प्रतिनिधि

6. विकास आयुक्त, झारखंड सरकार

7. नियंत्रक, विधिक माप विज्ञान , आंध्र प्रदेश

8. नियंत्रक , विधिक माप विज्ञान , महाराष्ट्र

9. नियंत्रक , विधिक माप विज्ञान , बिहार

10. नियंत्रक, विधिक माप विज्ञान , पंजाब

11. नियंत्रक, विधिक माप विज्ञान , मणिपुर

12. प्रतिनिधि, वाणिज्य मंडल , झारखंड

13. मैकेनिकल इंजीनियरिंग कंसलटेंट्स ( मैकॉन ) रांची का प्रतिनिधि

13. विकास आयुक्त, झारखंड सरकार

14. पदेन सदस्य:

विधिक माप विज्ञान निदेशक ,

उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग

15. पदेन संयोजक:

निदेशक,

भारतीय विधिक माप विज्ञान संस्थान , रांची

[फाइल सं. डब्ल्यूएम-2 ( 3 )/2009 ]

राकेश कक्कड़ , अपर सचिव

ORDER

New Delhi , the 14th October, 2009

1 S.O. 2932. In pursuance of Sub Rule (2) of Rule 8 of the Indian Institute of Legal Metrology Rules , 1980 , the Central Government hereby reconstitutes the Advisory Committee of the Indian Institute of Legal Metrology, Ranchi , consisting ofthe following person , with effect from the date of publication of this Order in the Official Gazette , namely: - Chairman:

1. Secretary, Department of Consumer Affairs ,

Members.:

2. Additional Secretary or joint Secretary , Department of Consumer Affairs ,

3. Representative of Ministry of Law Branch Secretariat , Kolkatta 6437 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

4. Representative ofthe Director, National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi

5. Representative of the Director General , Bureau of Indian Standards

6. Development Commissioner, Govt of Jharkhand ,

7. Controller of Legal Metrology , Andhra Pradesh

8. Controller of Legal Metrology, Maharashtra

9. Controller of Legal Metrology, Bihar

10. Controller ofLegal Metrology, Punjab

11. Controller of Legal Metrology, Manipur

12. Representative ofChamber of Commerce , Jharkhand

13. Representative of Mechanical Engineering Consultants ( MECON) , Ranchi .

14. Ex- Officio Member:

Director of Legal Metrology, Department ofConsumer Affairs

15. Ex-Officio Convener :

Director,

Indian Institute of Legal Metrology, Ranchi

[F. No. WM-2 (3 )/2009]

RAKESH KACKER, Additional Secy.

भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो

नई दिल्ली, 12 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2933.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि भारतीय मानकों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिये गये हैं वे स्थापित हो गए हैं :

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या

क्रम सं.

औरशीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों, यदिकोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

IS 3370 ( भाग 1 ) : 1965

30जून 2009 1 IS 3370 ( भाग 1 ) : 2009 द्रवों के संग्रहण के लिये कंक्रीट संरचनाएं- रीति संहिता : भाग 1 सामान्य अपेक्षाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

30जून 2009

IS 3370 ( भाग 2 ) : 1965

2 IS 3370 ( भाग 2 ) : 2009 द्रवों के

संग्रहण के लिये कंक्रीट संरचनाएं- रीति संहिता : भाग 2 प्रबलित कंक्रीट संरचाएं (पहला पुनरीक्षण)

इस भारतीय मानक की प्रतियां भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन, 9 , बहादुर शाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों: नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर, भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ: सीईडी /राजपत्र]

ए. के. सैनी, वैज्ञानिक ' एफ' एवं प्रमुख ( सिविल इंजीनियरी ) 6438

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS New Delhi , the 12th October, 2009

S.O. 2933. In pursuance ofclause ( b) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that amendments to the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been established on the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sl . No.

Date of Established

No.& Year ofthe Indian Standards Established and Title

No. & Year of Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standard

(2)

(4)

(1)

(3)

30 June 2009

IS 3370 ( Part 1 ) : 1965

1 IS 3370 (Part 1) : 2009 Concrete Structures for Storage of Liquids - Code of Practice: Part 1 General Requirements ( First Revision )

30 June 2009

IS 3370 ( Part 2): 1965

2 IS 3370 ( Part 2) : 2009 Concrete Structures for Storage of Liquids - Code of Practice: Part 1 General Requireınents ( First Revision)

Copy ofthis standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur , Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: CED/Gazette]

A. K. SAINI , Sc . ' F ' & Head ( Civil Engg .)

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 19 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2934. केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि, इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए 'जाने की संभावना है ;

अतः अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उस क्षेत्र में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी )/ भूमि/350 तारीख 18 जुलाई , 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1 , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता 700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्डस लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर- 495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाली भूमि में हितबद्ध सभी व्यक्ति उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट सभी नक्शों, चारों और अन्य दस्तावेजों को इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिन के भीतर , भारसाधक अधिकारी या विभागाध्यक्ष ( राजस्व ) साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, सीपत रोड , बिलासपुर -495006 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) को भेजेंगे । [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6439

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

अनुसूची

जमदेई- गुमगरा ब्लाक , बिश्रामपुर क्षेत्र

जिला-सरगुजा ( छत्तीसगढ़ )

रेखांक संख्या - एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम (पीएलजी ) /भूमि / 350 तारीख 18 जुलाई , 2009 ( पूर्वेक्षण के लिए अधिसूचना भूमि दर्शाते हुए ):-

पटवारी ग्राम

क्रम सं.

ग्राम नम्बर

हल्का नम्बर

262

42 1.

पेंडरखी

42 2.

कुन्दरई

42 3.

जमदेई

150

42 अर्जुन नगर

37 5.

गुमगराकला खुर्द 136

135

37 गुमगराकला

327

37 7.

बगदर्दी

आरक्षित वन

सीमा वर्णन: -

जिला

टिप्पणी तहसील

क्षेत्र हेक्टर में

588.921

सरगुजा

संपूर्ण सुरजपुर

भाग

1285.597

सरगुजा

सुरजपुर

1259.487

संपूर्ण सरगुजा

सुरजपुर

174.908

सरगुजा

सुरजपुर

संपूर्ण

302.176

संपूर्ण अम्बिकापुर सरगुजा

598.773

भाग अम्बिकापुर सरगुजा

भाग

708.305

अम्बिकापुर सरगुजा

भाग

1157.236

कुल क्षेत्रफल:-6075.403 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 15012.23 एकड़ ( लगभग)

क-ख रेखा " क " बिन्दु से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम पेंडरखी रतनपुर के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई जाती है और ग्राम कन्दरई से गुजरती है और घुंगट्टा नदी के पश्चिमी किनारे में बिन्दु " ख " पर मिलती है ।

ख- ग रेखा घुंगट्टा नदी के पश्चिमी किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और ग्राम कन्दरई-परसोदीकला- राजापुर की सम्मिलित सीमा में " ग " बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

गं- घ रेखा ग्राम कन्दरई -परसोदीकला, गुमगराकला खुर्द- परसोदीकला , गुमगराकला- परसोदीकला और गुमगराकला- कटकोना के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई जाती है और " घ " बिन्दु पर मिलती है ।

घ-ङ रेखा ग्राम गुमगराकला, बगदर्दी के मध्य भाग और आरक्षित वन से होती हुई जाती है और रेहर नदी के पूर्वी किनारे पर बिन्दु "ङ " में मिलती है ।

ङ- क रेखा रेहर नदी के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015 /23/2009-पी. आर.आई.डब्ल्यू-1 ]

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 19th October , 2009

S.O. 2934. Whereas it appears to the Central Government that Coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule hereto annexed ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) , (hereinafter referrred to as the said Act ), the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal therein .

The plan bearing Number : SECL/BSP/GM (Plg ) / Land /350 dated the 18th July, 2009 of the area covered by this notification can be inspected in the Office of the Collector , Surguja (CG ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section ), Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495006 (Chhattisgarh) .

Allpersons interested in the land covered by this notification shall deliver all maps, charts and other documents referred to in sub- section (7) of Section 13 of the said Act to the Officer- in- Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue) , SouthEastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 ( Chhattisgarh), within ninety days from the date ofpublication ofthis notification in the Official Gazette .

6440

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKΑ 2 , 1931

[PART 11-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Jamdai- Gumgara Block, Bishrampur Area

District- Surguja (CG .)

Planbearing number SECL/BSP/GM (Plg )/Land /350 dated 18th July, 2009 ( Showing the land notified for prospecting) :-

SI. No.

Village number

Name of Village

Patawari halka number 1.

262

42 Pendarkhi

42 2.

Kandrai

Jamdai

150

42 3.

42 Arjunnagar

37 Gumgarakala -Khurd 136

135

37 Gumgarakala

327

Bagdarri

Reserve Forest

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :-

Tahsil

District

Remarks

Area in Hectares

588.921 Full Surguja

Surajpur

1285.597 Part Surguja

Surajpur

1259.487 Full Surajpur Surguja

174.908 Full Surguja

Surajpur

302.176 Full Surguja

Ambikapur

598.773 Part Surguja

Ambikapur

708.305 Part Surguja

Ambikapur

1157.236 Part Total :-6075.403 hectares ( approximately) or 15012.23 acres ( approximately)

A-B Line starts from point " A" and passes along the common boundary of villages Pendarkhi- Ratanpur then enter and passes in village Kandrai and meets at point " B " on the western bank of River Ghungatta .

B-C Line passes along the western bank of Ghungatta River and meets at Point " C" on the common boundary ofvillages Kandrai -Parsodikala - Rajapur C-D Line passes along the common boundary ofvillages Kandrai -Parsodikala, Gumgarakala Khurd - Parsodikala, Gumgarakala-Parsodikala and Gumgarakala - Katkona and meets at point "D" .

D-E Linepasses through middle part of village Gumgarakala , Bagdarri and Reserve Forest and meets at point 'E ' on the eastern bank of Rehar River .

E-A Line passes along the eastern bank of Rehar River and meets at starting point " A ".

[F. No. 43015/23 /2009 - PRIW - 1 ]

M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली , 19 अक्तूबर , 2009

का.आ. 2935. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन भारत सरकार में कोयला मंत्रालय के द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 367 तारीख 4 फरवरी , 2009 जो भारत के राजपत्र के भाग II , खंड 3 , उपखंड ( ii ) , तारीख 14 फरवरी , 2009 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 81.040 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 200.25 एकड़ ( लगभग ) है , कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त भूमि में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है :

अतः केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 की धारा 7 कीउप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 81.016 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 200.19 एकड़ ( लगभग ) माप की उक्त भूमि का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है । 6441 [ भाग 1 ] - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

टिप्पण 1: - इस अधिसूचना के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी/जीएम ( पीएलजी )/ भूमि/352 तारीख 6 अगस्त, 2009 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , जिला- उमरिया ( मध्य प्रदेश ) के कार्यालय में या कोयस्ता नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल हाऊस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता-700001 के कार्यालय में या साऊथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व अनुभाग ) , सीषत रोड , बिलासपुर 49.5001 ( छत्तीसगढ़ ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2 : - उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं: - अर्जन के बाबत् आपत्तियां: -

" 8 ( 1 ) कोई व्यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण: -

( 1 ) इस धारा के अन्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

( 2 ) उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी , आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने , विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात्, जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि का या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा ।

(3 ) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का. हकदार होगा , यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते हैं" । टिप्पण 3: - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , । , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कालकाता-700001 को उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन अधिसूचना सं. का.आ. 905 , तारीख 20 मार्च , 1987 जो भारत के राजपत्र. भाग II , खंड 3 , उप खंड ( ii ) तारीख 4 अप्रैल , 1987 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

अनुसूची

विन्ध्या डेपिलरिंग ब्लाक , जोहिला क्षेत्र

जिला-उमरिया ( मध्य प्रदेश )

[रेखांक सं. एसईसीएल/बीएसपी /जीएम ( पीएलजी ) / भूमि/352 तारीख 6 अगस्त, 2009]

सभी अधिकार:-

टिप्पणियां पटवारी

तहसील

जिला क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में

ग्राम का नाम

क्रम सं.

जनरल नम्बर

हल्का नम्बर

81.016

1 .

भाग

उमरिया

डगडउवा

120

290

बान्धवगढ़

कुल क्षेत्र: -81.016, हेक्टर ( लगभग) या 200.19 एकड़ ( लगभग ) 1. ग्राम डगडउवा ( भाग ) में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्या: -

192 ( भाग ) , 193 ( भाग ) , 194 ( भाग ) , 195 से 202 , 203 ( भाग ) , 204 ( भाग ) , 205 से 209 , 210( भाग ) , 211 , 212 ( भाग ) , 213 ( भाग ) , 216 ( भाग ) , 254( भाग ) , 257 ( भाग ) , 258 ( भाग ) , 259 से 265 , 266 ( भाग ) , 267 से 269 , 270( भाग ) , 271 ( भाग ) , 273 (भाग ) 1

3689 G1/09-10 6442

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[ PART 11- SEC . 3 ( ii ) | सीमा वर्णन: -

क-ख-ग रेखा लहंगी नाले के पूर्वी किनारे पर बिन्दु " क " से आरंभ होती है और ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 273 , बिन्दु ' ख', 270 , 271 से गुजरती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है ।

ग -घ -ङ रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 271 , 257 , 258 से होते हुए जाती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 259 की उत्तरी सीमा , 254 बिन्दु ' घ ' से गुजरती हुई प्लाट संख्या 210 की पश्चिमी सीमा में बिन्दु " ङ' पर मिलती है ।

ङ-च-छ रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 210 , 213 , 212 , 216 बिन्दु ' च ' से होते हुए जाती है और 204 से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु ' छ ' पर मिलती है ।

छ- ज- झ ञ रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 203 से होते हुए बिन्दु ' ज' , बिन्दु ' झ ' से होते हुए जाती है फिर प्लाट संख्या, 203 की पूर्वी सीमा से गुजरती हुई और बिन्दु " ज " पर मिलती है ।

ज-ट-ठ रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 203 बिन्दु ' ट ' से गुजरती हुई जाती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 195 के भागतः पूर्वी सीमा से होकर प्लांट संख्या 192 , 194 से गुजरती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 193 की पूर्वी सीमा से होती हुई और बिन्दु " ठ " पर मिलती है ।

ठ-ड- ढ -ण रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा के प्लाट संख्या 193 , 194 से होते हुए जाती है फिर प्लाट संख्या 194 , 198 , 199 , 266 के दक्षिणी सीमा , बिन्दु ' ड ' , प्लाट संख्या 266 , 273 और बिन्दु ' ढ ' से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु " ण " पर मिलती है ।

ण- क रेखा ग्राम डगडउवा में लहंगी नाला के पूर्वी किनारे से होती हुई जाती है और आरंभिक बिन्दु " क " पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/22/2008 -पी.आर.आई.डब्ल्यू ।।

एम. शहाबुद्दीन , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th October , 2009

S.O. 2935.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 367 dated 4th February, 2009 issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development ) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957 ) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) and published in the Gazette of India , Part - II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii) dated 14th February , 2009 , the Central Government gave notice or its intention to prospect for coal in 81.040 hectares ( approximately ) or 200.25 acres ( approximately ) ofthe lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification:

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification :

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the lands measuring 81.016 hectares (approximately ) or 200. 19 acres ( aproximately ) as All Rights in or over the said lands described in the Schedule appended hereto.

Note 1 : The plan bearing Number : SECL/ BSP/GM ( PLG) / Land /352 dated the 6th August, 2009 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the Office of the Collector , Umaria ( Madhya Pradesh ) or in the Office of the Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata- 700 001 or in the Office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited ( Revenue Section) , Seepat Road , Bilaspur- 495 006 ( Chhattisgarh ) .

Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows :

Objection to Acquisition :

"8 ( 1 ) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued , may . within thirty days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land .

Explanation , -

( 1 ) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Governinent or by any other person .

6443 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(2) Every objection under sub- section ( 1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any , as he thinks necessary, either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record ofthe proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government.

(3) For the purposes of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act. " Note 3 : The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 , has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under Section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 905 , dated the 20th March , 1987, published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 4thApril , 1987.

SCHEDULE

Vindhya Depillaring Block, Johilla Area District- Umaria ( Madhya Pradesh )

( Plan Number : SECL/ BSP/GM ( Plg ) / Land /352 dated the 6th August, 2009 )

All Rights :

Remarks

District

Tahsil

Area in Hectares

Sl . No.

General number

Name of Village

Patwari halka number

Part

81.016

290

Umaria

Dagdauwa 102

Bandhogarh

Total-81.016 Hectares ( approximately) or200.19 Acres (approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Dagdauwa (Part):

4 192(P) , 193 (P) , 194(P), 195 to 202, 203 (P), 204( P) , 205 to 209, 210( P), 211 , 212( P), 213 (P), 216 ( P), 254( P) , 257 (P) , 258 ( P) , 259 to 265, 266(P) , 267- to 269,270(P) , 271 (P ), 273 (P) .

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION :

A- B -C

Linestarts from point ' A' on the eastern bank of Lahangi Nullah and passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 273 , point ' B ' , 270 , 271 and meets at point ' C' .

C-D- E

Line passes through in village Dagdauwa through plot number 271 , 257 , 258 , northern boundary of plot number 259 , through 254 , point ' D' and meets at point ' E ' on the western boundary of plot number 210 .

E-F-G

Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 210, 213 , 212 , 216 point ' F ' , 204 and meets at point'G'.

G-H- I -J

Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 203 , point. ' H ' , point ' I ' , then along eastern boundary ofplot number 203 and meets at point ' J' .

J-K-L

Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 203 , point ' K' , then along partly eastern boundary ofplot number 195 , through plot number 192, 194, along eastern boundary of plot number 193 and meets at point' L' .

L- M - N- O

Line passes in village Dagdauwa through plot number 193 , 194, then along southem boundary of plot number 194 , 198 , 199 , 266 , point ' M' , through plot number 266 , point'N ' , 273 and meets at point ' O ' .

O-A Line passes in village Dagdauwa along eastern bank of Lahangi Nullah and meets at starting point "A " .

[F. No. 43015/22/2008 - PRIW -1 ] M. SHAHABUDEEN, Under Secy .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2. 1931

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii ) ] 6444

पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2936.- कैन्द्रीय सरकार को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पंजाव गज्य में ग्मन मंडी मे हरियाणा राज्य में वहादुरगढ़ तक, पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुग्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरशन लिमिटेड द्वाग 'जी जी एम आर उत्पाद निप्कमण परियोजना " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक पाइपलाइन विछाई जानी चाहिए;

और कंन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में , जो इम अधिसूचना में मंलग्न अनुमूचि में वर्णिन है और जिममं पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का पग्नान है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए:

अतः अव , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धाग 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए. उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घापणा करती है;

कोई भी व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुमूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितवद्ध है, उस तारीख मे जिमको भारत के गजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इम अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ माधागण जनता को उपलव्ध क़ग दी जाती हैं , इक्कीम दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीच पाइपलाइन विछाने के. मंबंध में श्री प्रहलाद सिंह , (हरियाणा ) , हिंन्दुग्नान पेट्रोलियम काग्जिन लिमिटेड, गुरु गोविन्द सिंह रिफाइनरी उत्पाद निप्कमण परियोजना, एम मी.एफनं. 29, मैक्टर 6, वहादुरगढ 124507, हरियाणा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज मकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य: हरियाणा

जिला : हिसार

तहसील : नारनौंद

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

हेक्टेयर एयर

मुस्ततिल संख्या

खसरा /किला संख्या

हदबस्त संख्या

(7)

(5) (6)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

1. लौहारी राघो

22/1

1/1

2/1

2/2

9 6415 भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(5) (6)

(1)

(2)

(7)

(3)

(4)

12/1

.00

10/1

10/2

.07

20/1

00 .

9/1

गग्ना

15/2

गग्ना 6446

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIΚΑ 2. 1931

[ Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (2)

(3)

(4)

(7)

(5) (6)

20/1

20/2

375

438

00 00

01 04

| फा. स. आर 31015/41/2009 ओ.आर. [ I ]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas

New Delhi , the 21st October , 2009

S. O. 2936.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government , that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Raman Mandi in the State of Punjab to Bahadurgarh in the State of Haryana for implementation of "GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh " , should be laid by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited ;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification:

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub- section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to shrni Prahlad Singh, Competent Authority ( Haryana ) , Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited , Guru Gobind Singh Refinery Product Evacuation Project , SCF No. 29 , Sector - 6 Market , Bahadurgarh - 124507, Haryana .

6447 | भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) |

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : NARNAUND

District : HISAR

State : HARYANA

Area Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Mustatil No.

Khasra / Killa No.

Are

Hectare

Square Metre

(2)

(3)

(1)

(7)

(5)

(4)

(6)

84 1. LOHARI RAGHO

22/1

1/1

2/1

2/2

12/1

10/1

10/2

01.

40.

.00

20/1

9/1

Carttrack

10 6448

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii) ]

(5) (6) (7) (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

15/2

Carttrack

20/1

20/2

375

438.

[F. No. R -31015/41/2009-O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI . Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर , 2009

का. आ. 2937.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का.आ. 1945 दिनांक 13.07.09, द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे उसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा जायेगा) की धारा 3( 1) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर, रमन मंडी (पंजाब राज्य में) से बहादुरगढ़ (हरियाणा राज्य में) तक, पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड़ द्वारा "जी जी एस आर उत्पाद निष्क्रमण परियोजना रमन मंडी से बहादुरगढ़ पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन " के सम्बन्ध में उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में निर्दिष्ट तहसील नारनौंद जिला हिसार राज्य हरियाणा की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी,

और, उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 31.08.2009 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,

और, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अतः, अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

और, केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये यह निर्देश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार केन्द्रीय सरकार में निहित होने की बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड़ में निहित होगा । 6449

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

अनुसूची

राज्य: हरियाणा

जिला : किसार

तहसील : नारनौंद

क्षेत्रफल

वर्गमीटर गाँव कानाम

हेक्टेयर एयर

खसरा/ किला संख्या

मुस्ततिल संख्या

हृदबस्त संख्या

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

रास्ता

1. लौहारी राघो

22/1

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

3/2

1.00

14/1

14/2

24/1

24/2

10/2

19: 00 00

89:

9-1 /

368791/

11 6450

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

नाला

रास्ता

21/1

21/2

113

1/2

24/1

24/2

124

4/1

5/1

5/2

00 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ]

(7) (6)

14 05

57 06

39 02

78 10

12 00

25 11

89 12

39 00

25 09

53 02

65 03

03 03

25 08

85 03

28 00

50 01

77 11

89 02

78 10

12 00

40 13

59 05

81 09

03 03

25 00

06 05

83 06 6451

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5)

(2)

(3)

(4) (1)

124

15/1

125

143

20/2

21/1

22 00

144

2/1

2/2

8/2

9/1

9/2

14/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

145

(7) (6)

25 00

03 03

13 11

12 10

25 00

27 02

42 14

04 04

25 00

57 06

09 08

39 12

25 13

91.

25 00

50 06

83 12. 65

25 00

01 01

09 08

85. .08

75 00

12 10

27 01

83 06 6452

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931 (1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

161

2/2

4/1

4/2

162

12/1

12/2

13/2

175

176

8/2

13/1

13/2

177

[Part II-Scc . 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 02

27 14

16 04

80 00

25 12

14 09

86 00

25 00

75 10

87 03

79 08

85 01

31 05

91 13

12 10

85 13

15 00

25 12

90 00

25 02

02 14

27 02

25 05

81 07

33 06

12 10

31 05

06 05 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

6453

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

(5)

(4)

201

202

19/2

22/1

नाला

208

17/1

17/2

22/1

209

9/3.

9/4

10/2

10/3

12 (6) (7)

02 02

42 14

02 02

06. 13

15 00

85 08

30 04

01 01

42 00

81 05

33 12

39 05

06 00

25 02

53 00

85 08

26 01

13 12

39 12

39 00

25 01

01 00

25 00

32 06

28 03

78 11

63 6454

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

13/1

209

14/1/2

14/2

रास्ता

15/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

210

2/1

2/2

2/3

6/2

6/3

7/1

7/2

8/1

8/2

9/1

9/2

211

नाला

377

386/1

393

407

408

424

427

00 [Part II-Sec . 3 (ii )] (6) (7) 12

65 04

04 00

75 01

51 01

01 02

27 01

26 11

89 00

25 03

54 12

90 07

02 02

53 02

54 07

55 04

25 12

02 02

33 00

50 00

25 03

54 11

50 00

79 03

75 00

50 01

01 01

01 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

6455

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(3) (1)

(2)

(4)

428

431

486

24 2. मोठ करनेल साहिब

-10

157

163

3. गामडा

91.

122

(7)

(6)

(5)

51 00

77 00

00-

50 00

78 00

39 00

65 00

86 00

04 00

50 00

25 00

32 00

04 00

63 00

81 00

77 00

75 6456

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(3)

(1)

(2)

(4)

4. मोठरागंरान

25/2

14/1

14/2

21/1

21/3/1

[Part II Scc. 3 ( ii ) |

(7) (5) (6)

15 00

01 00

15 00

42 00

62 00

50 00

26 00

25 00

51 00

67 00

25 00

77 00

78 00

62 00

04 00

01 00

33 00

81 00

89 00

42 00

51 00

16 00 [भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

141

147

5. राखी शाहपुर

148

151

2/1

2/2

7/2

14/1

14/2

15/2

152

21 3689089-12

6457

(7) (5) (6)

77 00

40 00

02 00

77 00

61 00

84 00

85. 00

34 00

08 00

12 00

87 00

32 00

56 00

81 00

25 00

38 00

63 00

09 00

25 00

28 00

90 00 6458

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

159

2/1

2/2

174 8. नारनौंद

9/1

9/2

10/1

10/2

रास्ता

15/1

15/2

रास्ता

21 [Part II-Scc. 3( ii ) ]

(6)

(5)

(7)

51.

3 00

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(3)

(4)

(2)

(5)

2/1

9/2/1

9/2/2

9/2/3

12/1

12/2

रास्ता

25/1

रास्ता

21/2

रास्ता

6459 (6) (7) 07

84 05

06 01

62 10

01 07

59 01

26 03

79 00

50 12

39 09

03 03

25 12

26 01

86 09

26 01

86 09

09 08

50 00

02 02

50 10

62 02

50 00

62 12

65 05

31 05

77 6460

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ΚΛΗΤΙΚΑ 2 , 1931

(4)

(5)

(2)

(3)

(1)

रास्ता

6/1

6/2

15/2

2/1

2/2

6/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

रास्ता

12 [Part 11 Scc . 3 (ii ) ] (6) (7) 00

62 10

02 02

61 09

62 10

77 03

79 09

36 00

39 12

26 11

63 01

26 12

32 06

39 12

.07 06

78 02

60 08

04 04

57 09

.53 02

16 14

25 00

25 10

12 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

6461

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(2)

(5) (1)

(4)

(3)

रास्ता

118

119

रास्ता

133

9/1

9/2

12/2/1

12/2/2 00

24/1

24/2

163

4/2

164

6/2

15/1

00 (6)

(7) 03

03 12

65 00

10 09

03 05

06 12

65 00

25 12

65 00

80 04

59 12

65 08

09 07

84 04

55 05

56 07

07 06

32 06

65 04

80 00

07 06

79 00

50 12

34 08

03 03

03 6462

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

15/2

164

रास्ता

5/1

179

180

10/1

10/2

21/1

21/2

22/1

2/1

205

2/2

9/1

9/2

221

7/1

7/2

00 [Part II-- Sec. 3 (ji ) ] (6) (7) 04

56 04

30 12

65 07

08 00

50 10

37 05

81 05

81 12

65 01

26 10

37 02

53 00

25 00

34 08

81 05

81 07

08 04

30 10

87 00

25 06

07 05

56 00

79 03

75 03

54 12

14 08

60 00

25 05

06 07

08 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

222

20/1

20/2

238

239

रास्ता

240

3/1

3/2

रास्ता

256

4/1

4/2

6463 (6) (7)

85 08

34 08

75 10

12 05

31- 00

50 12

65 12

65 01

26 07

33 04

04 00

50 12

90 00

50 08

09 01

51 11

89 13

40 04

04 01

51 11

89 00

75 04

80 13

66 00

50 08

34 00

75 11

63 03

10 09

03 6464

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

256

257

10/1

10/2

20/2

258

271.

नाला

272

273

00 [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii )]

(7) (6)

37 00

25 04

04 03

33 07

10 09

66 06

14 12

08 07

84 05

06 12

61 09

25 11

63 12

39 01

51 00

75 00

04 04

65 12

50 00

60 08

63 11

65 03

03 13

38 11

51 01 [ भाग II- खष्य 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजमंत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

6465

(2)

(3)

(5) (6) (7)

(4)

200

291

21/2

21/3

173

413

416

511

526

552

816

7. औरंग शाहपुर

रास्ता

11/1/2 00

11/4

12.

13/1

13/2

14/1

14/2

15/1

15/2

102

3689 GI/09-13 6466

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIΚΑ 2, 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

103

रास्ता

1/1

104

1/2

रास्ता

200

: 92

8. पेटवाड

19/1

19/2

14 [Part II Sec . 3 (ii) |

(7) (6)

66 02

27 01

01 01

51 12

39 10

12 00

50 00

50 10

62 12

65 08

09 02

78 04

30 04

25 00

50 04

30 03

85 08

25 00

39 02

34 08

75 00

13 11

75 00

13 11

03 03

09 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6467

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

21.

18/2

19/1

19/2

22/1

23/1

23/2

106

10/1

10/2

12/1

12/2

17/2

18/1

18/2

00 (6)

(7) 12

14 11

63 02

27 11

13 06

07 05

81 11

63 11

63 09

61 00

50 11

38 01

12 10

26 10

37 01

77 07

84 04

55 00

50 05

61 09

27 00

25 06

32 07

84 03

54 06

57 00

25 00

25 12

65 05

31 05

31 6468.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(4) (5) (1)

106

3/1

107

4/1

4/2

132

1/2

133

17/3

18/1

18/2

23/2

24/1

25/1

25/3

134

149

10/1

1.0/2

11/2

12/2

19 [Part II Sec . 3 (ii ) ] (6) (7) 14

16 00

50 00

25 04

80 07

84 05

06 10

37 01

67 14

26 01

77 14

92 00

25 13

91. 03

03 03

80 04

81 05

25 05

56 05

06 06

07 00

50 10

62 09

86 00

75 00

25 07

84 01

13 11 6469

भारत का राजपत्र मक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(1)

5/3

150

180

8/1

8/2

13/2

161

197

23/1

23/2

$75

198

228

88 00 13

15/1

15/2

16 6470

THỀ GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4)

(5)

229

11/2

243

3/1

24/2

273

274

282

283

8/2

13/1

13/2

14/1

00 [ Part 11 Sec . 3 ( ii) | (6) (7) 01

25 00

90 05

06 06

32 12

65 01

26 12

65 00

84 07

32 06

15 13

61 09

39 07

08 00

79 03

12 90

25 00

14 03

28 07

84 00

25 12

39 03

86 09

66 13

50 00

26 01 6471

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931.

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(6) (7)

(5)

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

14/2

283

17/1

17/2

312

1/1

313

1/2

24.

314

23/1

23/2

24/2

1/1

318

00 :

4/2

8/1

8/2

2 2 9

319

5 6472

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[Part II- Sec. 3( ii) }

(2)

(3)

(4)

(6)

(5)

413/2 00

427

429

430

433

438

450

459

460

463

525

624

626

632

651

652

654

[फा. सं. आर-31015/41/2009 ओ.आर. ।।

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st October, 2009

S. C. 2937.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 1946 dated the 13thJuly 2009, issued under sub-section (1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Productsfrom Raman Mandi in the State of Punjab to Bahadurgarh in the State of Haryana by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited for implementing the "GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh" in Tehsil Narnaund, District Hisar, in Haryana State;

Andwhereas, copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public ση31.08.09 .

Andwhereas, the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the saidAct, has submitted his report to the Central Government.

Andwhereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

6473 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby sub-section (1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is acquired;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of users in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances .

SCHEDULE

State: HARYANA

District : HISAR

Tehsil : NARNAUND

Area

Nameof Village

Hectare

Mustatil No.

Are

Hadbast No.

Khasra / Killa No.

Square Metro

(5) (6)

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

(7)

Carttrack

1. LOHARI RAGHO

22/1

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2

3/2

14/1

14/2

24/1

24/2

00 00

25 5

10/2

02 75 02

3689Gl/09-14 6474

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1 )

(2)

(3)

(4) (5)

Nala

92 Carttrack 00

21/1

21/2

113

1/2

24/1

24/2

124

4/1

5/1

5/2

00 [Part II Sec .3(ii)] (6) (7) 12

81 05

57 12

78 02

12 00

25 11

89 12

39 00

25 09

36 02

53 12

65 03

03 03

25 08

85 03

28 00

50 01

77 11

89 02

12 10

25 13

40 07

59 05

81 09

86 03

03 00

25 02

02 05

06 06

83 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(4) (1)

(3)

(5)

(2)

124

15/1

125

143

20/2

21/1

144

2/1

2/2

8/2

9/1

9/2

14/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

145

6475 (6) (7) 10

12 00

25 03

03 11

13 10

12 00

25 02

27 14

04 04

25 12

65 06

31 05

09 12

39 00

25 13

91 00

25 00

50 06

83 12

65 00

25 01

01 08

09 08

85 04

75 00

27 02

83 06 6476

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /ΚΑΡΤΙΚΑ 2 , 1931

(2)

(4) (1)

(3)

(5)

2/2

161

4/1

4/2

162

12/1

12/2

13/2

17.

175

176

8/2

13/1

13/2

177

5 Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) | (6) (7) 02

27 14

16 04

80 00

25 12

14 09

25 00

75 10

79 03

85 08

26 01

31 05

01 01

12 08

85 13

15 00

25 12

25 00

02 14

67 02

27 00

25 05

33 07

07 06

12 09

61 05

06 05 भारत का राजपत्र: अमचूर 24, 2009 / कार्तिक 2, 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(1)

(2)

201

19/2

202

22/1

Nala 00

208

17/1

17/2

20-

22/1

9/3

209

9/4

10/2

10/3

6477

(2)

02 02

42 14

02 02

06 05

15 13

25 00

85 08

38 11

30 04

01 01

42 14

75 00

81 05

33 07

39 12

25 00

53 02

50 00

85 08

26 01

13 11

39 12

25 00

75 00

25 00

32 06

28 03

78 02

63 11 6478

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

209

13/1

14/1/2

14/2

Carttrack

15/1

15/2

16/1

16/2

17/1

17/2

210

2/1

2/2

2/3

6/2

6/3

7/1

7/2

8/1

8/2

9/1

9/2

211

Nala

377

386/1

393

407

408

424

427

00 [Part II--Sec. 3 (ii)]

(7) (6)

65 04

04 00

75 01

51 01

01 02

27 01

26 11

89 00

25 03

54 12

90 07

33 02

02 02

53 03

54 07

84 04

55 00

25 12

65 02

02 07

33 00

50 00

25 03

54 11

63 00

50 03

28 03

79 00

75 00

50 01

01 01

01 6479

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(2)

(4)

(3)

(1)

428

431

486

2. MOTH KARNIAL SAHIB

157

163

3.GAMRA

122

(6)

(5)

77 00

26 00

50 00

78 00

61 00

14 00

04 00

56 00

50 00

32 00

53 00

04 00

63 00

00 6480

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

(5) 4. MOTH RANGRAN

25/2

14/1

14/2

21/1

21/3/1

00 [Part II Scc. 3 ( ii) | (6) (7) 13

15 01

01 13

15 00

25 14

42 02

27 10

62 00

50 01

26 00

25 13

66 01

51 00

25 14

67 00

25 01

78 02

62 11

13 04

04 01

01 07

33 09

61 05

81 03

28 11

89 00

25 14

42 01

51 00

25 14

16 भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6481

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(3)

(4)

(2)

141

21 5. RAKHI SHAHPUR

147

148

151

2/1

2/2

7/2

14/1

14/2

15/2

152

21 3689 G1/09--15

(6)

(5)

(7) 00

50 00

40-

77 00

84 00

08 00

87 00

32 00

56 00

25 00

38 00

63 00

78 00

09 00

00. 25 00

13.

78 00

90 00 6482

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIΚΑ 2 , 1931

[Part II- Sec . 3(ii ) ]

(4)

(6) (7)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(1)

159

2/1

2/2

174

6. NARNAUND

9/1

9/2

10/1

.50

10/2

Carttrack 00

02.

15/1

15/2

Carttrack 00

00 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931 (1 )

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

2/1

9/2/1

9/2/2 00

00:

9/2/3

12/1

12/2

Carttrack 00

Carttrack

Carttrack 00

Carttrack

25/1

Carttrack 00

.10

21/2

Carttrack

6483 :.

(6) (7)

84 07

06 01

01 10 62 01

01 07

59 01

26 03

79 00

39 12

36 09

03 00

25 12

39 01

86 09

01 01

26 01

86 09

09 00

50 00

50 02

02 00

50 10

62 02

27 00

50 10

62 12

65 05

31 05

77 01 6484

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(1)

(4) (5)

Carttrack 00

6/1

6/2

15/2

2/1

2/2

6/1

6/2

15/1

15/2

Carttrack 00

Carttrack

00 [Part II--Scc . 3 (ii) | (6) (7) 00

25 10

62 00

75 02

02 09

61 02

78 10

62 01

77 03

36 09

25 12

39 01

26 11

63 01

26 12

32 06

39 12

07 06

78 02

28 08

60 04

04 06

57 09

36 02

53 00

7.5 14

16 00

25 00

12 6485

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4) (1)

(3)

(5)

(2)

Carttrack

118

119

Carttrack

133

9/1

9/2

12/2/1

12/2/2

24/1

24/2

163

4/2

164

6/2 00

15/1 (6) (7) 03

03 12

65 00

25 09

03 03

06 05

65 00

25 12

65 00

80 04

65 12

09 08

84 04

55 05

56 07

08 06

07 00

32 06

65 04

80 00

50 06

07 03 79

50 00

34 08

03 03 6486

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ΚΑΡΤΙΚΑ 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(4)

(5)

(3)

164

15/2

Carttrack

5/1

179

180

10/1

10/2

21/1

00-

21/2

22/1

2/1

205

2/2

9/1

9/2

00.

221

7/1

7/2

15 [ Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) ]

(7) (6)

56 04

30 12

65 07

08 00

50 10

37 05

81 05

65 01

26 10

37 02

53 00

25 00

25 08

34 05

81 05

81 07

08 04

30 10

87 00

25 06

56 05

25 03

79 00

75 03

54 12

60 08

06 05

08 07 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6487

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(2)

(5) (1)

(3)

(4)

222

20/1.

20/2

238

239

11.

Carttrack

Carttrack 00

240

3/1

3/2

Carttrack 00

256

()

4/1

4/2

00.

5 (6) (7) 08

85 06

34 08

75 00

12 05

31 00

50 12

65 12

26 01

33 04

04 00

50 12

90 00

50 08

09 01

51 11

89 13

40 04

04 01

51 11

89 00

75 04

80 13

66 00

34 08

75 11

63 03

10 09

03 6488

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA :

OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(3)

(2)

(5)

(4)

256

257

10/1

10/2

()

258

20/2

271

Nala

272

13.

273

00 Part II Sec. 3 (ii) |

(7) (6)

37 00

25 04

04 03

54 07

33 00

10 09

66 06

83 12

14 07

08 07

84 05

06 12

61 09

25 11

63 12

39 01

51 00

50 CO

04 12

65 12

65 00

50 08

60 11

63 12

65 03

03 13

40 11

38 01

51 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

6489

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक2, 1931

(2)

(5)

(3)

(4)

290

21/2

291

21/3

173

413

416

511

526

552

816

7. ORANG SHAHPUR

Carttrack

11/1/2

11/4

13/1

13/2

14/1

14/2

15/1

15/2

102

3689 Gl/09-16

(6) (7) 06

32 03

28 00

75 09

61 00

50 02

78 00

50 01

01 01

01 00

50 06

06 05

90 07

08 08

85 13

40 03

03 01

51 00

25 00

25 11

38 12.

39 12

77 01

10 10

62 01

77 01

62 10

10 09 6490

[Part 11 Scc. 3( ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTΙΚΑ 2, 1931

(6)

(3)

(5)

(7) (1)

(2)

(4)

103

Carttrack

1/1

104

1/2

Carttrack

200

8.PETWAR

19/1

19/2

14 6491 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

(7)

(6)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

17.

18/2

19/1

19/2

22/1

23/1

23/2

10/1

106

06.

10/2

12/1

12/2

17/2

18/1

18/2

23 6492

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 / KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

106

3/1

107

4/1

4/2

132

133

1/2

17/3

18/1

18/2

23/2

24/1

25/1

25/3

134

149

10/1

10/2

11/2

12/2

19 [ Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) | (6) (7) 14

16 00

50 00

80 04

06 05

37 01

51 14

67 00

50 01

77 01

25 00

03 03

80 04

25 00

56 05

07 06

50 10

86 09

75 00

25 07

77 01

13 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

149

5/3

150

180

8/1

8/2

13/2

181

197

18.

23/1

23/2

198

228

15/1

15/2

6493 (6)

25 00

15 13

25 00

51 01

37 10

77 01

09 08

02 02

40 13

85 08

56 05

39 12

75 00

07 06

59 07

66 13

25 00

51 01

02 02

57 06

30 04

75 00

66 13

60 08

28 03

12 10

25 00

25 00 6494

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(2) (3)

(5)

(4)

229

11/2

243

3/1

00.

24/2

273

274

282

283

8/2

13/1

13/2

14/1

00 [Part 11 -Scc . 3(ii )] (6) 7 01

77 00

25 12

90 05

06 06

32 12

65 01

26 12

65 00

75 07

84 06

32 00

50 13

15 02

27 09

61 12 39 07

08 00

25 03

79 12

90 00

25 12. 14 03

28 07

84 00

25 12

39 03

03 09

25 00

66 00

50 01

28 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931 [भाग II-खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

14/2

283

17/1

17/2

312

1/1

313

1/2

314

23/1

23/2

24/2

1/1

318

4/2

8/1

8/2

319

00.

6495

(7) (6)

50 00

60 08

25 00

50 00

42 14

51 01

36 09

31 05

25 00

16 14

77 01

27 02

15 13

79 03

03 03

65 12

39 12

25 00

05 81

25 00

39 12

87 10

79 03

25 00

34 08

90 12

85 08

50 00

25 00

00 50

33 07

39 12

39 6496

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[Part II Scc . 3 ( ii) ]

(2)

(3)

(6) (7)

(5)

(4)

413/2

427

429

430

433

438

450

459

460

463

525

624

626

632

651

652

654

[F. No. R- 31015/41/2009- O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नईदिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर, 2009

का. आ. 2938-- केन्द्रीय सरकार को लोक हित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पंजाव राज्य में रमन मंडी से वहादुरगढ तक, पेटोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा ' जी जी एस आर उत्पाद निष्कमण परियोजना " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु एक पाइपलाइन विछाई जानी चाहिए ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन विछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में, जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूचि में वर्णित है और जिसमें पाइपलाइन विछाए जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;

अतः अव, केन्द्रीय सरकार, पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;

कोई भी व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितवद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशितः इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन विछाने के संबंध में श्री गगनदीप सिंह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , (पंजाव) , हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड, गुरू गोबिन्द सिंह रिफाइनरी उत्पाद निप्कमण परियोजना , गांवः फूलो खारी, रिफाइनरी गेट, तहसीलः तलवंडी साबो, जिलाः भटिंडा, पंजाव को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा । | भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) |

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009 /कार्तिक 2 , 1931

6497 तहसील : तलवंडी साबो जिला : भटिंडा राज्य: पंजाब

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

हदबस्त संख्या

मुस्ततिल संख्या-

खसरा/ किला हेक्टेयर

वर्गमीटर

एयर

(2)

(1)

(3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

130

139

1. त्यौना पुजारीन

2. मलकाना

125

209

3. मिरेजयाना

136

|फा. सं. आर 31015/42/2009 ओ.आर. 1.]

ए. गोस्वामी, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st October , 2009

S. O. 2938. Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessaryin the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh in the State of Punjab for implementation of " GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bahadurgarh " , should be laid by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby Sub -section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Govemment hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of User therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section (1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri Gagarı Deep Singh , Competent Authority ( Punjab ) , HindustanPetroleum Corporation Limited , Guru Gobind Singh Refinery Product Evacuation Project , Village: Phullo Khari , Refinery Gate, Tehsil : Talwandi Saboo , District: Bhatinda Punjab.

3689 Gl/09-17 6498

[Part II Sec. 3(ii ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2, 1931

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : TALWANDI SABO0 District: BATHINDA State : PUNJAB

Area

Mustil No.

Nameof Village

Hadbast No.

Khasara / Killa No. Hectare Are

Square Metre (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(7)

(6)

130

139

04 1. TEHONA PUJARIN

125

209

2.MALKANA

136

03 3.MIRZIANA

[F. No. R- 31015/42/2009- O.R. - II ]

A. GOSWAMI , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली, 21 अक्तूबर, 2009

का. आ. 2939-- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय के का.आ. 1942 दिनांक 13.07.09, द्वारा पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962(1962 का 50) (जिसे उसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा जायेगा) की धारा 3 (1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचना प्रकाशित कर , रमन मंडी से भटिंडा (पंजाब राज्य में) तक, पेट्रोलियम उत्पाद के परिवहन के लिए हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड़ द्वारा "जी जी एस आर उत्पाद निष्क्रमण परियोजना रमन मंडी से भटिंडा पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन" के सम्बन्ध में उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में निर्दिष्ट तहसील तलवंडी साबो जिला भटिंडा राज्य पंजाब की भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी,

और, उक्त अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 06.09.2009 को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी, और, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित करने का विनिश्चय किया है ।

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुये घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अर्जित किया जाता है ।

| भाग 11-खण्ड 3 ( ii )]

अनुसूची

राज्य: पंजाब तहसील : तलवंडी साबो

जिला : भटिंडा

क्षेत्रफल

गाँव का नाम

वर्गमीटर

मुस्ततिल संख्या

हेक्टेयर एयर

हदबस्त संख्या

खसरा/ किला संख्या

(6) (7)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(1)

(5)

122

25 1. रामसरा

13/1

13/2/1

18/1.

18/2

19/1

3/2

7/2

4/2

24/1/1

24/1/2

24/2

25/1

25/2

5/1

5/2

6 6500

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1/1

1/2

11/2

19/2

14/1

14/2

95/1

96/1

100

115/2

186

193 2. रामां

121

7/1

7/2

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii)] (5) (6) (7) 00

25 00

39 00

03 00

06 00

65 00

54 00

77 00

89 00

50 00

57 00

30 00

09 00

25 00

38 00

01 00

77 00

51 00

77 00

01 00

50 00

30 00

13 00

12 6501 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1981

[भागः खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(7)

(3)

(2)

(1)

26 09 04

8/1

8/2

888

08-

9/1

9/2

106

19/1 6502

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

106

19/2

136

21/1

21/2

149

336

337

341

343

350

540

1313

1329 3. बाघा

120

15/1

16/1/1

16/1/2

16/1/3

16/2/1

16/2/2

5/1

5/2

6/1

6/2

14/1

[Part II Sec. 3( ii ) ]

(6)

(5)

(7) 00

61 00

08 .00

12 00

54 00

60 00

01 00

77 00

51 00

28 00

27 00

50 00

01 00

61 00

25 00

50 00

61 00

51 00

00 6503

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/ कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(6)

(7)

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

15/2

16/1

16/2

16/3

25/1

25/2

25/3

5/1

14/1/1

14/2

17.

24/1

24/2

4/1

4/2

7/2

23/1

23/2

05.

8/1

8/2

18/1

00 6504

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(1)

(2) (3)

(4)

18/2

23/1

23/2

113

121

2/1

-2/2

3/1/1

3/2

122

134

6/1

6/2

134

15/1

15/2

137

4/1

[Part 11 Sec . 3 ( ii ) ] (5) (6) (7) 00

07 00

10 00

02 00

13 00

/ 00

01 00

51 00

36 00

31 00

66 00

01 00

90 00

13 00

25 00

55 00 03

54 00

03 00

59 00

77 00

25 00

13 00

79 6505 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(7)

(4)

(8)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(1)

154

161

168

169

171

-00

02-

193

237

4.बंगी निलसिंह

00 00 88

13/1

13/2

14/1

21/2

3/2/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

8/1

8/2

1/1

1/2

00 01

8888 00

00.

3689 G1/09-18 6506

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

2/2

16/1

17/2

4/2

12/1

12/2

21/1

21/2

1/1

16/1

17/1

17/2

00 [Part II Sec. 3 (ii) ] (6) (7) 11

63 02

02 12

39 00

75 00

75 12

14 07

28 03

39 04

30 08

85 12

39 07

75 00

39 12

84 00

25 04

30 12

39 03

25 00

62 10

50 12

39 01

51 03

33 07

50 00

62 भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/ कार्तिक 2 , 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1)

19/1

19/2

22/1

107

123

11-

6507

(6) (7) (5)

08 00

87 00

38 00

50 00

87 00

60 00

02 00

13 00

62 00

50 00

60 00

00 6508

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(3)

(2)

(4)

123

136

20/2

137

25/1

193

195/1

203/1

209/1

210

211

240

243

17 5. बंगी रूलदू

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

2/2

3/1

3/2

[Part II Sec . 3 (ii )]

(6) (7) (5)

13 00

10 00

56 00

50 00

53 00

56 00

60 00

25 00

27 00

77 00

34 00

77 00

13 00

08 00

85 00

25 00

38 00

03 00

08 00

14 00

54 00

25 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

6509

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

9/1

9/2

12/1

20/1

20/2

21/1

21/2

5/1

5/2

243

272

309

150

6. कोट बब्लू

151

152

159

160

199

201/2

202

212/1

268/1

268/2

269/1

269/2

269/4 (5) (6) (7) 00

51 00

13 00

50 108

26 00

84 00

-00

25 00

79 00

50 00

01 00

07 00

12 00

02 00

85 00

57 00

51 00

03 00

14 00 12 6510

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(2)

(1)

(3)

(5)

(4)

270/1

275/2

278/2

278/3

278/4

278/5

282

00- [Part II Sec . 3 ( ii) ] (6) (7) 20

24 07

59 10

87 08

60 00

50 01

87 31

283/1/2

283/1/1/1 00 07

33 02

283/1/1/2

283/2

302

351/1

373

388

391/1

391/2

392

404/1

404/2

405

416

646

1306

1359/2

1360/1

1360/2

1361/1

1361/2

1361/3

1361/4 15

68 02

03 03

06 03

28 35

16 01

51 26

31 27

22 19

60 27

83 19

22 01

77 03

28 02

56 05

10 09

55 04

55 10

12 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931 , (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1362

1363

1369/1

1370/1

1370/2

00.

1408

1446/1

1446/2

1447

1448

00.

1449

1451

1477

1478

1479

1480/1

1497

1498/1

1499

1505/3

1506/1

1506/3

1507/1

1507/2

1510

1511/1

1511/2

1521

1527/1

1528

1557

6511 (6) (7)

50 00

31 02

78, 25

04 00

50 06

83 07

59 10

62 10

12 13

74 20

01 00

01 01

77 1.1

89 01

77 23

78 12

14 00

25 06

32 16

19 09

36 04

55 05

06 00

50 04

55 01

51 14

02 02

30.

6512

[Part II--Scc.3 (ii )} THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(4) (1)

(2)

(3)

1558

1560/2/1

1560/2/2

33/1/1 7. नसीबपुरा

33/1/2/1

127

130

215

216/1

219

223/1

223/2

226

231/1

231/2

234/1/1

234/1/2

234/1/3

239/2

242/1

242/2

247/1

247/2/1

247/2/2

250/1

250/2

(6)

(5)

(7) 00

93 00

83 00

56 00

51 00

56 00

78 00

83 00

12 00

27 00

03 00

81 00

26 00

02 00

50 00

75 [भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(3)

(2)

(4)

16/1

16/2

10/1

10/2

11/2

6513.

(6) (7) (5)

01 00

30 00

87 00

80 00

90 00

50 00

55 00

66 00

60 00

00.

04 00

77 00

18/2/2

23/1/1

90 00

36 00

23/1/2

23/2

24/1 3689G1/09-19

25 00

25 6514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(2) (3)

(4)

(5)

4/2

6/1

3/3

16/2

14/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

25/1

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/.2/1

103

319

00 [ Part II Scc. 3 (ii ) ] (6) (7) 01

26 13

15 05

06 02

78 11

38 08

09 07

33 12

14 00

25 11

63 04

61 09

06 10

30 04

61 02

02 04

04 06

07 02

78 03

79 05

56 03

79 00

50 00

25 14

78 02,

85 00

25 01

51 03

28 02

01 01 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

327

331

332

336 8. नथेहा

141

17/1

17/2

10/1

12/2

20/2

15/1

15/2

6515 (5) (6) (7) 00

26 00

25 00

50 00

27 00

09 00

04 00

86 00

12 00

25 00

91 00

62 00

54 00

87 00

10 00

66 00

12 00

77 00

26 00

90 6516

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(2)

(3)

(4) (1)

17/2

103

104

109

16/1

16/2

[Part II --Sec. 3 (ii) ] (5) (6) (7) 00

25 00

80 00

65 00

78 00

66 00

77 00

66 00

81 00

06 00

60 00

84 00

77 00

34 00

06/ भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक. 2, 1931 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

109

110

123

124

10/1

25/1

25/2

126

127

13/1

13/2

6517

(7)

(6)

(5)

86 00

00 6518

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ΚΑΚΤΙΚΑ 2 , 1931

(1)

(2) (3)

(4)

127

128

133

134

4/2

7/2

135

165

172

175

205

211

219

224

¡Part II -Scc . 3 (ii )] (5) (6) (7) 00

31 00

03 00

65 00

75 00

87 00

63 00

33 00

25 00

84 00

39 00

86 00

83 00

02 00

86 00

83 00

77 00

31 00

90 00

53 00

51 00

01 00

77 00

01 6519 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(7)

(6)

(1)

(2)

(5)

(3)

(4)

389

591.

616

617

618

[फा. सं. आर-31015/42/2009- ओ.आर.-II |

ए. गोस्वामी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 21st October, 2009

S. O. 2939.-Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas , published in the Gazette of India vide number S.O. 1942 dated the 13th July 2009, issued under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User In Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) , (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) , the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Raman Mandi to Bhatinda in the State of Punjab by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited for implementing the "GGSR Products Evacuation Project pipeline from Raman Mandi to Bhatinda " in Tehsil Talwandi Saboo , District Bhatinda, in Punjab State;

Andwhereas, copies of the said gazette notification were made available to the public on06.09.09.

And whereas , the Competent Authority has under sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the saidAct, has submitted his report to the Central Government .

And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report is satisfied that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification should be acquired;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1 ) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is acquired;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby directs that the right of users in the said land shall instead of vesting in the Central Government , vest from the date of publication of this declaration , in the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited free from all encumbrances.

6520

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[Part II Sec. 3 ( ii ) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : TALWANDI SABOO

District : BHATINDA

State : PUNJAB

Area

Name of Village

Hadbast No.

Mustatil No.

Are

Khasra / Killa No. Hectare

Square Metre

(7) (1)

(2)

(3)

(5) (6)

(4)

122

25 1. RAMSARA

13/1

13/2/1

18/1

18/2

19/1

3/2

7/2

14/2

24/1/1

24/1/2

24/2

25/1

25/2

5/1

5/2

26 6521

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

1/1

1/2

11/2

19/2

14/1

14/2

95/1

96/1

100

115/2

186

193

7/1

121

2. RAMAN

7/2

17 3689 G1/09-20

(7) (5) (6)

75 00

39 00

78 00

03 00

06 00

60 00

89 00

77 00

89 00

31 00

30 00

09 00

38 00

01 00

77 00.

77 00

01 00

30 00

12 00

10 6522

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

8/1

8/2

00.

9/1

9/2

106

19/1

00 [Part II Scc. 3 ( ii ) ] (6) (7) 01

26 08

09 04

04 11

38 02

27 05

81 10

37 11

13 00

25 11

13 01

01 10

12 08

09 03

03 00

50 10

62 11

13 11

13 00

25 10

87 08

60 00

75 01

77 06

07 05

06 02

53 08

60 11

25 11

13 11

51 6523

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

19/2

106

136

21/1

21/2

149

336

337

341

343

350

540

1313

1329

120

3. BAGHA

15/1

16/1/1

16/1/2

16/1/3

16/2/1

16/2/2

5/1

5/2

6/1

6/2

14/1

(7)

(6)

(5)

61 00

08 00

12 00

25 00

54 00

25 00

01 00

77 00

50 00

51 00

61 00

11.

25 00

50 00

01 00

61 00

00 6524

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931 (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

15/2

16/1

16/2

16/3

25/1

25/2

25/3

5/1

14/1/1

14/2

24/1

24/2

4/1

4/2

7/2

14.

23/1

23/2

8/1

8/2

18/1

00 [Part II Scc . 3(ii) ]

(7) (6)

37 04

04 01

01 02

02 04

04 08

09 01

26 01

01 00

75 10

62 00

25 11

13 10

12 01

01 11

13 06

57 05

06 09

10 01

51 11

13 11

89 11

25 00

25 01

81 05

55 06

57 03

03 03

54 04

55 10

87 00

25 05

06 6525

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कातिक 2, 1931

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

18/2

23/1

23/2

113

121

2/1

2/2

3/1/1

3/2

122

134

6/1

6/2

134

15/1

15/2

137

4/1

(6) (7) (5)

10 00

02 00

13 00

25 00

36 00

31 00

66 00

90 00

13 00

39 00

55 00

54 00

77 00

87 00

13 00

79 6526

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ΚΑΚΤΙΚΑ 2 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

154

161

168

169

171

193

237

22 4. BANGI NIHARLSINGH

13/1

13/2

14/1

21/2

3/2/2

6/1

7/1

7/2

8/1

8/2

1/1

1/2

[Part II- Scc . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)

(7)

(6)

51 00

75 00

03 00

27 00

79 00

75 00

25 00

31 00

75 00

63 00

26 00

33 00

56 00

09 00

25 00

89 00

25 00

50 00

53 00

60 00

65 00

59 00

87 00

77 00

34 00

25 | भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6527

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2 , 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

2/2

16/1

17/2

4/2

12/1

12/2

21/1

21/2

1/1

16/1-

17/1

17/2

00 (6) (7) 11

63 02

02 12

39 00

75 00

75 12

14 07

59 03

28 12

39 04

30 08

85 12

39 07

08 00

75 05

81 12

39 07

84 00

25 04

30 12

79. 07

62 6528

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

19/1

19/2

22/1

107

123

Part 11 Sec . 3 ( ii) |

(7) (5) (6)

13 00

38 00

50 00

87 00

08 00

77 00

02 00

13 00

09 00

60 00

00 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

6529

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

123

136

20/2

137

25/1

193

195/1-

203/1

209/1

210

211

240

243

17 5. BANGI RULDHU

7/1

7/2

14/1

14/2

2/2

3/1

3/2 3689 G1/09-21

(5)

(7)

(6)

13 00

10 00

56 00

50 00

60 00

25 00

27 00

77 00

34 00

01 00

08 00

13 00

08 00

53 00

38 00

03 00

14 00

54 00

25 6530

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

(4)

(3)

9/1

9/2

12/1

20/1

20/2

21/1

21/2

5/1

5/2

243

272

309

150

8. ΚΟΤ ΒΑΚΗTU

151

152

159

160

199

201/2

202

212/1

268/1

268/2

269/1

269/2

269/4

[Part II Scc . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)

(7)

(6)

50 00

51 00

27 00

75 00

50 00

26 00

84 00

28 00

55 00

79 00

28 00

50 00

07 00

12 00

51 00

12 00

03 00

14 00 6684 भास्वःकल रामपवः अपर 24; 2009/ 2,1930

| भाग II- खण्डः 3(ii) ]

(7)

(4)

(2)

(1)

270/1

00.

275/2

278/2

278/3

278/4

278/5

282

283/1/2

283/1/1/1

68.

283/1/1/2

283/2

302

351/1

373

388

391/1

391/2

392

404/1

404/2

аз

405

416

646

1306

1359/2

02 02

1360/1

00 05 58

1360/2

001073

000010

1361/1

1361/2

00 04

1361/3

1361/4 6532

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(4)

(3)

(5)

1362

1363

1369/1

1370/1

1370/2

1408

1446/1

1446/2

1447

1448

1449.

1451

1477

1478

1479

1480/1

1497

1498/1

1499

1505/3

1506/1

1506/3

1507/1

1507/2

1510

1511/1

1511/2

1521

1527/1

1528

1557

00 [ Part II Sec . 3 ( ii ) | (6) (7) 00

31 05.

78 25

04 00

50 06

83 07

59 10

62 10

66 13

74 01

01 00

25 01

01 22

77 11

77 01

78 12

14 00

25 06

32 16

19 09

36 04

55 05

30 6533

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

(4)

(2)

(3)

(1)

1558

1560/2/1

1560/2/2

33/1/1

7. NASIBPURA

33/1/2/1

127

130

215

216/1

219

223/1

223/2

226

231/1

231/2

234/1/1

234/1/2

234/1/3

239/2

242/1

242/2

247/1

247/2/1

247/2/2

250/1

250/2

(7) (5) (6)

55 00

25 00

83 00

56 00

51 00

78 00

83 00

12 00

03 00

08 00

27. 00

81 00

26 00

02 00

75 00

00 6534

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KΑΚΓΙΚΑ 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

16/1

16/2

10/1

10/2

11/2

18/2/2

23/1/1

23/1/2

23/2

24/1

[Part II Sec.3 (ii) ] (5) (6) (7) 00

01 00

87 00

51 00

80 00

60 00

25 00

50 00

01 00

66 00

81 00

36 00

55 00

62 00

66 00

60 00

01 00

85 00

04 00

77 00

90 00

25 00

36 00

79 00

25 00

25 [भाग -खण्ड -3( ⅲ) ]

6535

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(2)

(3)

(5)

(4)

4/2

6/1

3/3

16/2

14/1

14/2

16/1

16/2

25/1

1/1

1/2

2/1

2/2/1

103

319

00 (9)

(7) 01

26 13

15 05

06 02

78 11

38 08

09 07

33 12.

25 00

63 04

55 09

06 10

12 04

30 09

14 16

01 6536

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

(1)

(2) (3)

(4)

327

331

332

336

141

13 8. NATHEHA

17/1

17/2

10/1

12/2

20/2

15/1

15/2

[ Part II-Scc. 3(ii ) ]

(7)

(6)

(5)

01 00

25 00

50 00

27 00

50 00

40 00

25 00

27 00

25 00

62 00

54 00

28 00

87 00

25 00

66 00

12 00

26 00

90 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3(ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

17/2

103

104

109

16/1

16/2 3689 G1/09-22

6537

(6)

(5)

(7)

25 00

80 00

38 00

53 00

65 00

25 00

78 00

77 00

50 00

77 00

13.

81 00

63 00

06 00

85 00

40 00

84 00

89 00

77 00

34 00

06 6538

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/ΚΑΡΤΙΚΑ 2. 1931

(3)

(4)

(5)

(2)

109

110

123

124

10/1

25/1

25/2

126

127

13/1

13/2

00 [ Part II Sec. 3( ii)

(7) (6)

25 05

33 07

14 12

51 01

25 00

30 04

02 02

01 14

42 02

75 00

78 02

37 10

25 00

66 13

54 03

30 04

39 12

56 05

79 03

15 13 65 | भाग IH- खण्ड 3(ii) ]

भास्व को राजपत्र अवसूबर 24, 2009/कारी 2, 1931

(2) (3)

127

128

0303

87.

000

σα

25.

133

07 198

134

4/2

00089

000988

712

000 0683

165

172

571

175

205

00%

0$ 011

2190

007

224

0111011

00: 022 78

389

0000227

551

0177

616

617

00 :

618

0075

[F. No R-31015/42/ 2000- O.R. -11 ]

A.GOSWAMI, Under Secy.

6540

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER24, 2009/KARTIKΑ 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ]

AWARD

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय

Passed on 11-09-2009

नई दिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2009

Government of India vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 301/95- IR(B- I) dated 8-4-97, by exercising its powers under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication of this Tribunal :-

का. आ. 2940.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्टेट बैंक ऑफ पटियाला के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण- I, चण्डीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 115/1997 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

"Whether the action of management of State Bank ofPatiala, Jalandhar in terminating of the services of Mrs. AlkaGupta w.e.f. 16-5-94 is legal and justified ? Ifnot, towhat relief the concerned workman is entitled and from what date ?"

[सं. एल -12012/301/95- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्कअधिकारी

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

NewDelhi, the 23rd September, 2009

NOTIFICATION

S.O. 2940. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 115/ 1997) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- LabourCourt- I, Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of State Bank of Patiala and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on23-9-2009 .

[No. L- 12012/301 /95-IR (B- 1 )] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

After receiving the reference , the parties were summoned. Parties turned up and filed their respective. pleadings . On perusal of the pleadings ofthe workman , it is evidently clear that the workman challenged her termination on the grounds of violation of principle of natural justice. As per the contention of the workman no enquirywas conducted before terminating her services . It was also contended by the workman that she provided with a Medical Certificate of a Registered Medical Practitioner and the management arbitrarily directed her to produce the Medical Certificate from the CMO without depositing the requisite amount. It was further contended by the workman that even if, her absent was a misconduct; an enquiry wouldhave been conducted by the management before terminating her services . On the basis of the above contentions, the workman has prayed for setting aside the order dsted 7-7-1995 terminating her services through her compulsory retirement with effect from 8-5-1994 and for a consequential order for her reinstatement into the services along with consequential benefits .

BEFORE SHRI GYANANDRA KUMAR SHARMA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT -L, CHANDIGARH

Case I.D. No. 115/1997

Smt. Alka Gupta, Kothi No. 30-A, Guru Nanak Nagar, Near Lal Mandir, P.O. Model Town , Jalandhar City-144003

.... Applicant

Versus

TheRegionalManager, State Bank ofPatiala, Region- I (J), Ambedkar Chowk, Jalandhar.

APPEARANCES

Forthe Workman

: Shri Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate.

For the Management : Shri N. K. Zakhmi, Advocate.

Themanagement of the bank appeared and contested theclaimoftheworkman by filing written statement. It was themain contention of the bank that her services were not terminated by the bank, but due to long unauthorized absence from the services , she was presumed to be voluntarily retired from the services ; in compliance of the provisions contained in Clause 17A of the 5th Bipartite settlement dated 10-4-2009 . It was further contended by themanagementof the bank that she was habitual in making unauthorized absence and had remained on leave without pay for 335 days during the calendar year from 1990 to 1994. Thereafter, she applied for the Medical leave with effect from 16-05-1994 to 30-6-1994 and she sought extension till 7-7-1994. Her application for extension of Medical Leave was supported by the Medical Certificate issued by a private Medical Practitioner . She was directed bythemanagement of the bank to provide with the Medical Certificate issued by the CMO as per the rules ofthe bank . She neither complied with the order regarding providing theMedical Certificate from the CMO nor joined the duties. Consequently after issuing a one month notice for her 6541 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

unauthorized absence on her 90 days unauthorized absence, she was presumed to be retired from the services.

registered notice was served upon the workman on 26-10-1994 asking the workman tojoin duties within 3 days fromthe receiptofthe letter. The workman did not respond tothe letter.Thereafter , on 1-12-1994 a registered notice for 30days was givento the workman informing her tojointhe duties by 31-12-1994, failing which she will be deemedto be voluntarily retired from the services .

Proper opportunity for filing the evidence was providedto theparties. Smt. Alka Gupta, the workman filed heraffidavit and she was cross- examined by the learned courisel for themanagement on 14-7-2003 and 22-5-2006. On the other hand Sri Charan Das filed the affidavit on behalf of the bank. The witness of the bank could not be cross-examined. Accordingly , as per the principle of law, justice and good conscious prevailed in the Tribunal no weightage shall be given to the contents of an affidavit filed by the witness of the bank. Certain documents have been filed by the bank from Annexure M - 1 to M - 7 . All theseAnnexures have been admitted by the workman in hercross-examination dated 14-7-2003 and 22-5-2006.

The workman has admitted to receive all the correspondence as mentioned above in her cross- examination. Thus , from 16-5-1994 the workman was on unauthorized absence from the duties and on 1-12-1994 a registered notice was served upon her asking her to join theduties within30days, which is the requirement ofclause 17Aof5thBipartite Settlement dated 10-4-1989 . This notice was received, but neither the workman joined the duties , nor explain the reasons for her remaining unauthorized absence . The notice was given after 90 days of unauthorized absence of the workman and she was rightly presumed tobe retired from the services on expiry of 30 daysnotice incompliance of the provisions ofClause 17A ofthe 5thBipartite settlement dated 10-4-1989. There is no illegality in the order passed by the management presuming hervoluntarily retirement from services with effect from 16-5-1994 from which she was unauthorized absent from the services. The workman, accordingly, is not entitled for any relief. Let Central Government be approached for publication of Award, and thereafter, file be consignedto record room.

G.K. SHARMA, Presiding Officer Ihaveheard the parties at length and perused the entirematerials on record. Clause 17A of the 5th Bipartite Settlement dated 10-4-1989 provides an opportunity to the management of the banks to take appropriate action on inactionofany workman for unauthorized absence . As per theprovisions ofclause 17A of the 5th Bipartite Settlement, if any workman remains on unauthorized absent continuously for 90 days (three months) , the management can give a notice for 30 days for showing cause for said unauthorized absence . If the workman after receiving the noticejoins the services , no consequence will follow. But, ifthe workman did not join the services nor explained the cause for unauthorized absence, the workman shall be presumed to be voluntarily retired from the services on expiry of30 days notice .

नई दिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर, 2009

का.आ. 2941.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 159/94 ) कोप्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं: एल-20012/39/1994- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 23rd September , 2009 Inthis case, the workman applied for the medical leave with effect from 16-5-1994 to 30-6-1994 and sought extension upto 7-7-1994 . The medical leave extension application was also supported by a Medical Certificate of privateMedical practitioner . On 6-6-1994 the management ofthe bank informed the workman to provide with the Certificate by CMO. It is provided in the rules of the management that a certificate of CMO/ other such GovernmentMedical Officer as provided in the rules, shall be given in support of the sickness of the workman . The letter was received but the workman did not bother to providewiththeMedical Certificate of CMO norjoined the duties. The correspondence between the management of the bank and the workman shows that it was in the notice ofthe workman that her medical leave application has been rejectedby the management of the bank on the grounds that medical leave were not available in her account. Instead of it, she did notreported for duties nor filed the explanation forher remaining unauthorized absence.

S.O. 2941. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 159/ 1994) oftheCentral Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in theindustrialdispute between the employers in relationto themanagement of M/ s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was receivedby the Central Government on 23-9-2009.

[No. L-20012/39/1994- IR(C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer On 27-8-1994 the management of the bank again informedtheworkman to provide the Certificate ofCMO in support of her application but in vain. Thereafter, a 6542

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SBC. 3 (ii)] ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1 ), DHANBAD

Inthematter ofa reference U/s. 10( 1 ) (d) (2A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

ReferenceNo. 159 of1994

PARTIES

Employers inrelation to the management ofMohuda AreaNo. II of M/ 3. BCCL.

AND Theirworkmen PRESENT

Sri H. M. Singh, PresidingOfficer

APPEARANCES

FortheEmployers

: Shri R. N. Ganguly, Advocate

For the Workman

: Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate

State: Jharkhand

: Industry: Coal

Dated, the 9th September, 2009

AWARD

sheet was issuedby the Dy. CME, Lohapati Colliery who has got no authority to issue charge-sheet or to suspend anemployee under the provisions of Certified Standing OrderofM/s . BCCL. On that score alone the charge-sheet and suspension order was illegal , arbitrary and void-ab initio. The concerned workman represented before the management against the illegal and arbitrary charge-sheet and the suspension order but without any effect. So the union raised an industrial dispute before the ALC( C) , Dhanbad against the illegal and arbitrary suspension order. During the pendency of the conciliation proceeding the management dismissed the concerned workman by conducting an invalid and irregular enquiry. Even in the invalid and irregular enquiry the concerned workman was notafforded full opportunity to represent his case or to cross-examine the management's witnesses . The Enquiry Officer was appointed by an unauthorised person whohas got no authority under the provisions ofStanding Orderto appointanEnquiry Officer. The Enquiry Officer was biased and prejudiced against the concerned workman and he completed the empty formalities at the back ofthe workman. Eveninthe invalid and irregular enquiry the charges against the concerned workman were not established still then the workman concerned was dismissed from service by an unauthorised person . After failure of conciliation proceeding the dispute has been referred to this Tribunal for adjudication. It has been submitted that the dismissal ofthe concerned workman was against the provisions of Certified Standing Orders and against the settled law of the land and his dismissal was too harsh and disproportionate to the alleged offence.

It has been praved before this Tribunal to answer the reference in favour of the workman by directing the management to reinstate the concerned workman with full backwages and other consequential benefits.

By Order No. L- 20012 (39)/ 94- IR ( Coal- I) dated 22/25-7-1994 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labourhas , inexercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub-section (1) and sub -sec. (2A) ofSection 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the General Manager , Mohuda Area No. II M/ s . BCCL, P.O. Mohuda (Dhanbad) in dismissing Shri Kala ChandDas , Loader w.e.f. 16-6-93 is justified ? Ifnot, to what relief is the concernedworkman entitled ? ".

2. Written statement has been filed on behalf ofthe concernedworkman stating that he had been working as a permanent Loader at Lohapati Colliery since long with unblemished record of service . The management issued a false and frivolous charge-sheet dated 19-9-92 to the concernedworkman for allegedly introducing one Mahesh ChandraMishra dismissed CMPF Clerk ofBhatdih Colliery in the Bank of India as Khagendra Nath Chatia. The concerned workman replied to the charge-sheet denying the charges emphatically . The concerned workman submitted before the management that the allegation as levelled in the charge-sheetdoes not constitute any misconduct. Sothe management has got no power to issue charge-sheet or to suspend him from service. The charge-

3. Written statement has been filed by the management stating that one Mahesh Chandra Mishra, theCoalMinesProvident Fund Clerk of Bhatdik Colliery ofMohuda Area devised some fraudulent method of withdrawingprovident fund amount deposited in the name ofdifferent workman of the colliery in the Coal Mines Provident Fund and in that connection the concerned workman, Kalachand Das , a loader ofLohapati Colliery of Mohuda Area became a party in adding and abating Mahesh Chandra Mishra, in commission offraud and dishonestyin withdrawing the amount lying in the name of different workman. Mahesh Chandra Mishra manipulated thedocuments and applied for marriage advance loan from CMPF inthe name ofKhagendra Nath Chatia, Mining Sirdar ofBhatdihColliery and got the loan for Rs. 18,000 only sanctioned from the Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner and a crossed cheque No. 872642 dated 28-8-1990was deposited in the Bank of India, Chas Branch for payment of Rs . 18,000 to Khagendra Nath Chatia. Mahesh Chandra Mishra opened a Savings Bank Account 6543 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009 कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग -खंड 3( ) ]

4. Both the parties have filed their respective rejoinders admitting and denying the contents of some of the paragraphs ofeach other's written statement.

5.On 6-9-2005 the domestic enquiry was held fair andproper. No oral evidence was adducedby either party. The enquiry papers have been marked as Ext. M - 1 , M -2 , M-3, M-4, M-5 andM-6.

6.Mainargument advanced on behalfoftheworkman thatthere is noviolation of Standing Order on which basis charge-sheet has been issued to him because the act committed incourse ofemployment regarding any violation ofStanding Order. As per charge- sheet isshedby the management, Ext. M- 1 which shows that the management has mentioned violation of Comapny's Standing Order 26.1.11 which prescribes theft , fraud or dishonesty in connection with company's business or property 26.1.12- giving false information regarding one's particular ; 26.1.13- indulging in corrupt practices and 26.1.15- causingwilful damage to work in progress or to the property ofthe employer. Under these four clauses the charge-sheet has been issued to the concerned workman, but it does not relate any offences as per provision of Certified Standing Orders oftheCompany. So it shows that the charge -sheet which has been issued to the concerned workman regarding identification to unknown person does not come within thepurview ofviolation ofStanding Orders ofthe Company. Another argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman that no second show cause notice was giving after charge-sheet. In this respect Ext. M-6 shows that no second show -cause notice has been given to the concerned workmanwhich shows violation ofnatural justice.

Another argument advanced on behalf of the concerned workman that a criminal case which has been filedagainsttheconcerned workman regarding lodging of F.I.R. In that very case he has been discharged and. exoneratedby the Court and when no criminal caso has beenproved, so no departmental enquiry can be made on thisground.As per photo copy filed by the workman in GR CaseNo. 3322/94/T.R. No. 530/98 he has been discharged on 3-9-1998 . Moreover no cognizance has been taken against the concerned workman as per order passed on 14-6-94 by Spl. J.M. , Dhanbad in R.C. 2(5)92 (D)-StateVs. KalachandDas & others . So when no cognizance has been taken against him, he was discharged. It shows that no defencehas been taken against the concerned workman on which basis he has been dismissed.

bearing PassBook No. 14351 in the Bank of India, Chas Branch and the concerned workman identified Mahesh Chandra Mishra as Khagendra Nath Chatia, to facilitate Mahesh Chandra Mishra to withdraw the amount of Rs.18,000deposited in the name ofKhagendra Nath Chatia by the Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner. Khagendra Nath Chatia, Mining Sirdar had neither applied forany loan nor he was knowing anything relating to the transaction and as soon as he realised the fraudulent transaction of Mahesh Chandra Mishra, he reported the matter to the management regarding the conduct of Mahesh Chandra Mishra and to the Bank for cheating him by withdrawing the amount ofRs . 18,000 from his Coal Mines Provident Fund Account. The departmental action was takenagainstMahesh Chandra Mishra, who was dismissed from his service. In course of investigation of the entire transaction it transpired that the concerned workman, KalachandDaswas actively participated in the transaction facilitating Mahesh Chandra Mishra , impersonating him asKhagendraNath Chatia and opening a bank account in the name ofKhagendra Nath Chatia and withdrawing the amount ofRs . 18,000 from the Coal Mines Provident Fund. Khagendra Nath Chatia, Mining Sirdar had neither applied forany loan norhe was knowing anything . On the basis of aforesaid facts a charge-sheet dated 19-9-1992 was issued totheconcerned workman charging him for commissionof misconducts under clauses 26.1.11, 26.1.12, 26.1.13 and 26.1.15 oftheCertified Standing Order ofthe Company. It is submitted that the concerned workman committed the misconduct of theft, fraud and dishonesty in connection with Company's business and property and indulged in corruptpractices and caused loss to one workman ofthe company facilitating withdrawal of Rs . 18,000 fromthe Provident Fund amount which was misappropriated by Mahesh Chandra Mishra . The concerned workman submitted his reply to the aforesaid charge-sheet on 22-9-92denying the allegations levelled against him. The management decided to get the matter enquired and accordingly appointed Shri J. U. Khan, Senior Personal Officer,Bhurungia Project, as Enquiry Officer , to conduct the departmental enquiry relating to the charge-sheetdated 19-9-92 and Shri R. S. Mahapatra was appointed as management representative to present the case before the EnquiryOfficer.According to the Enquiry Officer, he held the enquiry fairly and proper and in accordance with the principles ofnatural justice after giving full opportunityto the concernedworkman to defend his case. Thereafter the Enquiry Officer submitted his enquiry report holding the concernedworkman guilty ofthe charges levelled against him. The management considered the enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer and as the misconduct committed by the concered workman was very serious in nature, he was dismissed from services w.e.f. 16-6-93.

Ithasbeen prayed that an award be passedholding that the action of the management in dismissing the concemedworkman from his service was legal and justified andhe is not entitled to any relief.

Another argument advanced on behalf of the concernedworkman that the Enquiry Officer has not been examined or any witness of the Bank or any handwriting experthas been examined who has stated that the concemed workmanhas identified Mahesh Chandra Mishra as another person showing him as Khagendra Nath Chatia, even Khagendra Nath Chatia has not been examined by the EnquiryOfficer which shows that Enquiry Officer has not 6544

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

examined Khagendra Nath Chatia or any employee of the Bank and nohandwriting expert has been examined to show that the concerned workman has identified by his signature to Mahesh Chandra Mishra. Regarding territorial jurisdiction the employer has got no extra- territorial jurisdiction to punish when the act by the employee is outside the scope of employment. It has been argued that the employer is Guru or mentor of the workman for their well regulated cultural advancement, if the power to regulate the behavior of the workman outside the duty hours and at any place whenever they may be was conferreduponthe employer , contract of service may be reduced to contract of slavery. It has been further argued that if the misconduct not defined in standing order then the allegation cannot constitute misconduct and the workman cannot be punished. The aforesaid principle has been laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case reported in 1983 Lab . I.C. 1909 betweenGlaxo Laboratory (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Meerat . The sameview again confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court whichhas been reported in Supreme Court Service Rules (Vol- II) 239-1985 (1) LLJ 507between Rasık Lal Vaghajibhai Patel Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and another. The same view again reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SCLJ (I) 173 between A..L. Kalra Vs. Project & Equipment Corporation of India Ltd.

The dismissal of the concerned workman can be treated as illegal, arbitrary for the reason that no second show- cause notice was issued before order of dismissal. Inthis respect it has beenheld by Hon'ble Supreme Court inCurrent Labour Report 1991 page 61 between Union of India & Ors Vs. Md. Ramjan Khan and Allahabad High Court in 2002(94) FLR 1076 between Tej Kishore Sunder Vs. State ofU.P. , Jharkhand High Court in 2004 JLJR 282 betweenUranuim Corporation Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer , CGIT No. 1, Dhanbad, and also Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court in 2008 (2) JLJR 513 between Krishna Murari Sahay Vs. SteelAuthority of IndiaLtd.

7.Themanagement's counsel argued that the enquiry hasbeenheld fair and proper , so it cannot again scrutinised inhearing on merit of the case . In this respect learned counsel for the workman argued that after introduction of Sec. 11 -A of the I.D. Act, the Tribunal can appreciate and re-consider the evidence and come to a conclusion in one way or other even the enquiry was held by the employer and finding ofmisconduct arrived at, the Tribunal candefer from the finding and can hold that no misconduct proved which is reported in SCLJ (10) page 159 between workmen ofFirestone Type & Rubber Co. Vs. The Management & Ors. There is no evidence of connivance with the concerned workman inwithdrawing Rs . 18,000 from the Bank. The matterwas referred to C.B.I. and after conducting thorough enquiry the C.B.I. had come to the conclusion that the concerned workman was innocent and he had no role of fraudulent withdrawal of money from the Bank and

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] accordingly the C.B.I. filed no charge- sheet against the concerned workman , so he was discharged by C.B.I. Court on14-6-94. It has been argued that when the concerned workman has been acquitted by the Court on the same charge and the local P.S. has not found any case against the concerned workman then he cannot be dismissed and such order be illegal as per laid down by Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court reported in 2005 (2) JLJR 351 Sheochandra Jha Vs. State ofBihar&Ors .

8.Theconcerned workman referred 2009 ( 120 ) FLR 610betweenRoop Singh Nagi Vs. Pujnab National Bank , in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down:-

"Dismissal from Service-Appellant peon in respondent Bank, was dismissed from service for misconduct relating to stealing draft book, fraud/ embezzlement-He was thought discharged in criminal case for same allegation Inference drawn in disciplinary enquiry not supported by any evidence More suspicion is not enough for proof- Report of Disciplinary Authority not supported by any reason-A decision must be arrived at on some evidence, which is legally admissible-Order of dismissal from service not sustainable-Appellant isdirected to be reinstated with full back wages .

The order ofthe disciplinary authority as also the appellate authority are not supported by any reason. As the orders passed by them have severe civil consequences , appropriate reasons should have beenassigned. Ifthe enquiry officer had reliedupon the confession made by the appellant, there was no reason as to why the order of discharge passed by the Criminal Court on the basis of self- same evidence should not have been taken into consideration. The materialsbrought or record pointing out the guilt are required tobe proved . Adecision must be arrived at onsome evidence, which is legally admissible . The provisions of the Evidence Act may notbe applicable in adepartmental proceeding but the principles of natural justice are .As the report ofthe Enquiry Officer was based on merely ipse dixit as also surmise and conjectures , the same could not have been sustained. The inferences drawn by the Enquiry Officer apparently were not supported by any evidence . Suspicion, as is well known, however high may be , canunder no circumstances be held tobe a substitute forlegal proof. "

Ithas also been argued that justice should be tempered with mercy which has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a case reported in 1989 Lab . I.C. 1043. He has also referred 1983 Lab . I.C. 1909 in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down-" Misconduct neither defined nor enumerated in Standing Orders Not punishable merely because employer believes it to be misconduct ex post facto.(Industrial Disputes Act, 1947) .

6545 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

notice issued forproposed punishment-Therefore, the impugned dismissal order is legally not sustainahle-Order quashed-Directed to be reinstatedwith 50% back wages ."

Hon'bleSupremeCourt in YoginathD. BagdeV. State ofMaharashtra and another, had heldthat:

Some misconduct neither defined nor enumerated and which may be believed by the employer to be misconduct ex post facto would not expose the workman to apenalty. It cannot be left to the vagaries ofmanagement to say ex post facto that some acts of omission or commissionnowhere found to be enumerated in the relevant standing order is nonetheless a misconduct not strictly falling within the enumerated misconduct in the relevant standing order but yet a misconduct for the purpose of imposing apenalty."

Hehas also referred SCLJ (1) 173 in whichHon'ble Supreme Court held " Employees' (Conduct, Discipline andAppeal) Rules , 1975-Employees in public sector- Employees inProject and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd. Misconduct Removal from service-Misconduct not falling under any ofaforesaid rules Removal held not to be proper-Failure on part of instant employees in Corporationtoreturn advances for House Building and for purchasing motor cycle-No misconduct-Remedy is provided inRules .

Where misconduct when proved entails penal consequences, it is obligatory on the employer to specify and ifnecessary define it with precision and accuracy so thatany ex post facto interpretation of some incident may not be camouflaged as misconduct. Rule 5 prescribes various misconduct for which action can be taken against an employee governed by the rules. Failure tokeep to such high standard of moral, ethical or decorous behaviour befitting an officer of the company by itself cannot constitutemisconduct unless the specific conduct falls in any of the enumerated misconduct in Rule 5. (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules , 1975. Any attempt to telescope Rule 4 into Rule 5 must be looked upon with apprehensionbecause Rule 4 is vague and of a general nature and what is unbecoming of a public servant may varywith individuals and expose employees to vagaries of subjective evaluation ."

adelinquent employee has the right of hearing not only during the enquiry proceedings conductedby the Enquiry Officer into the charges levelled against him but also at the stage ofwhich those findings are considered by the disciplinary authority and the latter, namely, the disciplinary authority forms a tentative option that it does not agree with the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer. Ifthe findings recorded bythe Enquiry Officer are in favour ofthe delinquent and it has been held that the charges are not proved, it is all the more necessary to give an opportunity of hearing to the delinquent employee before reversing those findings. The formation of opinion should be tentative and not final . It is at this stage that the delinquent employee should be given an opportunity ofhearing after he is informed of the reasons on the basis of which the disciplinary authority has proposed to disagree with the findings of the Enquiry Officer . This is in consonance with the requirement ofArticle 311 (2) ofthe Constitution as it provides that a person shall not be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an enquiry in which he has been informed ofthe charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges . So long on a final decision is not taken in the matter, the enquiry shall be deemed to be pending. More submission of findings to the disciplinary authority does not bring about the closure of the enquiry proceedings . The enquiry. proceedings would come to an end only when the findings have been considered by the disciplinary authorityand charges are either held to be not proved orfoundtobeproved and in that event punishment is inflicted upon the delinquent. That being so, the 'right to be heard ' would be available to the delinquent up tothe final stage. This right being a constitutional right of the employee cannot be taken away by any legislatives enactment or service rules including rules made under Article 309 of the Constitution. "

Also referred SCLJ ( 10) 159 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laiddown:-

Also referred Current Labour Report 1991 (SC) 61 in which Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down-" Disciplinary proceedings whether necessary to supply to delinquent copyof InquiryOfficer's report-Whether he is entitled to make any representation against the same Whether any change is brought about by the 42nd Amendment-Held that supply of a copy of the inquiry report along with recommendations , if any, in the matter of proposal punishment to be inflicted would be within the rules of natural justice and the delinquent would therefore be entitled to the supply of a copy thereof and that the Forty SecondAmendment has not brought about any change to this position."

Hehas also referred 2002 ( 94 ) FLR 1076 ( Allahabad High Court) in which it has been held:-

"IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947, Sec. 11 -A-Domestic enquiryheld by the employer-Power ofTribunal to interfere with findings of misconduct- recorded in enquiry-Cases where proper and valid domestic enquiry was held before passing order of punishment-Power of Tribunal previous to "Dismissal from service-Neither the copy ofinquiry report supplied to petitioner-Nor any show cause

3689 GI/09-23 6546

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii) ] enactment of Section 11 -A and position subsequently changed by this Section-Cases where no enquiry was held by employer or enquiry heldwas defective.

workman-victim lady could not be examined due to herdeathbut thedisciplinary authority relying upon FIR and statement recorded by Police held that the chargeshavebeen rightly proved-order of dismissal based on FIR and statement recorded by police cannot be sustained in law-besides , when the petitioner was acquitted in criminal case in respect of same charges then the disciplinary authority or appellate authority is bound to reconsider the matter and pass appropriate order. "

imposed onthe powers of the Tribunal by the decision

Cases where an employer has held a proper and validdomestic enquiry before passing the order of punishment previously the Tribunal had no power to interferewith its findings of misconduct recorded inthedomestic enquiry unless one or other infirmities pointed out by the Supreme Court in India Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. , existed. The conduct of disciplinary proceeding and the punishment to be imposed were all considered to be a managerial function withwhich the Tribunal had no power to interfere unless the finding was perverse or the punishment was soharsh as to lead to an inference of victimisation or unfair labourpractice. Inview of this position the limitations inIndianIron& Steel Co. Ltd. case can be longerbe invoked by the employer . The Tribunal is now at libertyto consider not only whether the finding of misconduct recorded by an employer is correct, but alsotodiffer from the said finding, ifa proper case is made out. "

Theworkman also referred 2008 (2) JLJR 513 in which Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court held:-

9. From the above discussion it shows that the Enquiry Officer has not considered the discharge by Criminal Court regarding same offence and Disciplinary Authority has also not considered the same before imposing the punishment of dismissal . No second show- cause notice was issued prior to his dismissal and copies ofthe enquiryproceeding and report were also not supplied to the concerned workman before dismissal which is illegal and void ab initio in which law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court and High Court. In the enquiry proceeding nohandwriting expert was examined nor anybank employee has been examined to show that the concerned workman has identified Mahesh Chandra Mishra as KhagendraNath Chattia . Khagendra Nath Chattia has also not been examinedby the Enquiry Officer.All these show that there is no misconduct as per provision of Certified Standing Orders oftheCompany.

10.Accordingly, I render the following award :-

The action of the management of M/ s . BCCL , Mohuda Area, in dismissing Shri Kala Chand Das , Loaderw.e.f. 16-6-1993 is not justified. The concerned workman is entitled for re- instatement in servicewith 50% back wages and other consequential benefits . The management is directed to reinstate him in service within 30 days from the date of publication ofthe Award.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer

नईदिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2942.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 266/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

" Service Law-Departmental Proceedings- punishment of reduction of salary-before imposing punishment no second show cause notice served nor copy of enquiry report given by disciplinary authority- petitioner admittedly given no opportunity to defend himself nor informed on the basis of which impugned punishment awarded to him-clear case of prejudice and violation of principles of natural justice-appellate authority whiledismissing petitioner's appeal , also not made any discussion on several grounds advanced by petitioner-impugned orders quashed-directedto pay amount of deducted wages for suspension period." And 2005 ( 3) JLJR 351 in which Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down-" Service Law- Dismissal-petitioner proceeded against departmentally as well as facing criminal action simultaneously for charges of defalcation and corruption--departmental proceeding not stayed despiteprayer made by petitioner to this effect and dismissal was made earlier to the disposal of criminal proceeding in which the petitioner was subsequently acquitted-writ petition allowed with obvious consequences."

[सं. एल-20012/ 108/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 23rd September , 2009 Theworkman also referred 2002 ( 3) JLJR469 inwhich Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court laid down:-

S.O. 2942. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central "Service Law DismissalPetitioner dismissed from services for trying to out-rage the modesty of a [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

6547

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 266/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour CourtNo. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relationto the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which received by the Central Government on was 23-9-2009.

[No.L-20012/108/2000- IR(C- 1 )] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT : INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No.11), DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Reference No. 266 of2000

PARTIES

Employers in relation to the management of Bhuli Township Admn. ofM/ s.B.C.C.L.

AND

Theirworkmen

PRESENT

Sri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer APPEARANCES

: None

Forthe Employers

Forthe Workmen : None

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Dated, 4th September, 2009

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/108/2000- IR(C- 1 ), dated 14-9- 2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1 ) and sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following dispute for adjudication, to this Tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Bhuli Township Administration of M/ s . B.C.C.L. in superannuating Sri Chandrama Ram w.e.f. 3-10-1996 is justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

This casewas received in this Tribunal on 25-9-2000 . Thereafter, notices were sent to the parties to file written statement by the sponsoring union/workman . In spite of

notices sent by Registered post no written statement has been filedby the workman till24-8-2009. It, therefore, appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest the case.

In such circumstances , I render NO DISPUTE AWARD.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली , 23 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2943.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 58/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-20012/292/1999- आई आर (सी-1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 23rd September , 2009 S.O. 2943. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 58/ 2000) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure, in theindustrialdispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of M/s . E.C.L. and their workman , which was receivedby the Central Government on 23-9-2009.

[No. L- 20012/292/1999-IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1), DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10(1) (d) and (2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- Reference No. 58 of2000

PARTIES

Employers in relation to the management of Nirsa Colliery ofM/s . ECL .

AND

Theirworkmen PRESENT

Sri H. M. Singh, Presiding Officer 6548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

APPEARANCES

: None

FortheEmployers

Forthe Workman : None

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Dated, 8th September, 2009

AWARD

By order No. L - 20012/292/99/ IR ( C - 1 ), dated 21-1-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labourhas , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub-section ( 1 ) and sub- section (2A) ofSection 10 of Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 , referred the following dispute for adjudication, to this Tribunal :

"Whether the action of the management ofMugma Area ofECL in not regularising Sh . Bindaban Dutta asClerk is justified ? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled and from what date ?"

This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 1-2-2000. Thereafter, notices were sent to the parties to file written statement by the concerning union/workmen. In spite of notices sent by Regd. post, no written statement hasbeen filedby the workman till 24-8-09 . It therefore , appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest this case.

In such circumstances , I render NO DISPUTE AWARD in this reference case.

H. M. SINGH, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली, 23 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2944.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रके सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औधोगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , धनबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 262/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 23-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं. एल -20012/ 120/2000- आई आर ( सी-1 ) ]

स्नेह लता जवांस, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 23rd September, 2009 S.O. 2944. In pursuanceuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 262/ 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1 , Dhanbad now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . B.C.C.L. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 23-9-2009.

[No. L-20012/ 120/2000- IR (C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (No. 1), DHANBAD

Inthe matter of a reference under Section 10( 1) (d) and(2A) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Reference No. 262/2000

PARTIES

Employers in relation to the management of Sudamdih CoalWashery of M/ s . BCCL .

AND

Theirworkmen

PRESENT

Sri H. M. Singh , Presiding Officer

APPEARANCES

: None

FortheEmployers

For the Workman

: None

State: Jharkhand

Industry: Coal Dated, 7th September, 2009

AWARD

By order No. L- 20012/ 120/ 2000/IR (C- 1 ) , dated 14-9-2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has , in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub -section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , referred the following dispute foradjudication, to this Tribunal:

"Whether the demand of the union for regularisation ofSri Narayan Mahato as Clerk Grade- III from the management of Sudamdih Coal Washery of M/ s . BCCL is justified ? If so , to what relief is the workman entitled ?"

This reference case was received in this Tribunal on 25-9-2000 . Thereafter, notices were sent to the parties to filewritten statement by the concerning union/workman . Inspite ofnotices sent by Regd. post, no written statement hasbeen filed by the workman till 24-8-09 . It therefore, appears that neither the concerned workman nor the sponsoring union is interested to contest this case.

In such circumstances , I render NO DISPUTE AWARD in this reference case .

H. M. SINGH, Presiding Officer 6549 [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

APPEARANCE

नई दिल्ली , 24 सितम्बर, 2009

Forthe Petitioner Union : M/s K. M. Ramesh ,

N.Parameswar,

K.G.Vipranarayanan

: Mr. P. Srinivasan

FortheManagement

AWARD

का. आ. 2945.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इंटीगरल कोच फैक्ट्री के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , चैन्नई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 83/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -12012/206/2005- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ]

अजय कुमार, डेस्कअधिकारी

TheCentralGovernment, Ministry ofLabour vide its Order No. L- 12012/206/2005 - IR (B- 1 ) dated 15-9-2006 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal foradjudication.

NewDelhi, the 24th September , 2009

The schedule mentioned in that order is:

"Whether the action of the management of Integral Coach Factory, Chennai in transferring Sri G. Sridhar (Employee No. 696790) Technician Grade I/Fitter-General) to Patiala and again from Patial to Tirupati Workshop alongwith the post in administrative interest, is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the person concerned is entitled to ?"

S.O. 2945. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 83/ 2006) of theCentral Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum- Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Integral Coach Factory and their workmen, which was receivedby theCentralGovernment on 24-9-2009.

[No. L- 12012/206/2005-IR(B- 1 ) ] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

2. After the receipt of Industrial Dispute , this Tribunal has numbered it as 83/2006 and issued notices to both sides. Both sides entered appearance through their respective counsel and filed their Claim , Counter and Rejoinder Statement as the case maybe.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT CHENNAI

3. The averments in the Claim Statement briefly are asfollows:

Wednesday, the 16th September, 2009

PRESENT

A. N. Janardanan, Presiding Officer Industrial Dispute No. 83/2006

[Inthe matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause(d) ofsub-section ( 1) and sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , between the Management of Integral Coach factoryandtheir Workman.]

BETWEEN

: ... 1st Party/Petitioner

TheGeneral Secretary Integral Coach Factory, LabourUnion, Chennai

Vs.

1. The Chief Personnel Officer : .... II Party/ 1st Respondent

Integral Coach Factory, Chennai-600038

.... II Party/2nd

2. TheAsstt. Personal Officer/ :

Respondent

Sri G. Sridhar, Technician Grade - I under the Respondent was transferred to Patiala and therefrom to Tirupati workshop alongwith the post and the Industrial Disputepertains to the same. He a Staff Council Member raised dispute regarding outsourcing of regular works in direct conflictwith the avowed policy against it. The same resulted in the most valued machinery installed under the modernization programme becoming rusting and staff becoming surplus affecting the service conditions . The administration's invidious attitude to protect the responsible officials got the workmen transferred with the posttoDiesel Loco Modernization Works , Patiala by order dated 16-6-2005 without following statutory norms or hearing the workman. The transfer was said to be under administrative interest. Sensing revolt against the action , thetransfer was modified to Tirupati workshop by an order dated 1-7-2005 it was due to vindictiveness . The post was still available in ICF itself. The transfer is illegal and mala fideand a colourable exercise of powers . He was posted there intheProduction Control Office which shows absence of exigency of service for the transfer . He is only under a bonded obligation to work anywhere in ICF and not anywhere in India. Tirupati office is not under the control of ICF . Majority staff council members manifested their protest and complaint letters were sent to higher authorities which led the administration to be hostile towards the Workshop Integral Coach Factory, Chennai -600038 6550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

from ICF on 18-6-2005 . Bonus for 2004-05 has since been paid tohim. He made only one request on 9-8-2005 for his posting at Chennai if not retained at ICF, Chennai. Thus, hewastransferred to Loco Works, Perambur which transfer has been on his existing pay and scale alongwith the post, unlike in the normal case of employees where the transferees on request are allowed to retain their pay only and not scale ofpay.

workmanwhich with a motive harassed him denying leave, bonus, incentive etc. and ultimately contrived to procure him the vindictive transfer out of mala fide, such which transfer has never taken place in the ICF for the alleged reason. Industrial Dispute raised before Assistant Commissioner of Labour ( Central) having not been successful the same culminated in a failure report which in turnoccasioned into the present reference, as per order of the High Court of Madras in the wake of refusal by the Govt. ofIndia, Ministry of Labour and Employment to refer. the issue.His repeated requests thereafter for his re -transfer were in vain but he has since been transferred to Loco Works, Ayanavaram, Chennai . The transfer is vindictive and mala fide and is not legal and justified. The same is liabletobe interferred with. Hence the request for an award ofre-transferofthe workman back to ICF with all attendant benefits.

4. In the Counter Statement filed by the Respondents , the contention briefly read as follows :

Though his is an on request transfer, he has been posted as Technician Grade- I in bottom seniority in his grade unlike unless in the case of other on request transferees where there is an element of direct recruitment atbottom seniority. His given transfer on request is evidence ofno vindictive attitude against him . In his request letters nomention has been made about any vindictive attitude. The claim lacks maintainability since the Union espousing itdoes not have live registration and the workman being notan office bearer ofthe Union. Under Rule-226 of IREC Vol-1 , there is power with the President of India to transfer Railway servant to any other Railway establishment in or out of India. Transfer of workman was on administrative reason by Railway Board . It is not subject to judiciary. Transfer is a necessary incident of service career and assessment of quality , suitability and exigency of administration is to be made by the superiors . The dispute is to be dismissed .

Though the petitioner was transferred to Patiala alongwith thepost on administrative exigency, the transfer order was not carried out. Considering his request for a posting to a proximate workshop , his transfer order was modifiedto Tirupati . In the meantime of the reference on request of the petitioner he was posted at Loco Works Perambur on 25-9-2006 . ICF being a production unit no unions are recognized. The staff council is an advisory body and the decisions taken are only recommendatory butnotbound tobe implemented. Mere raising ofthe issue of outsourcing by the petitioner is not at all a ground to develop invidious attitude towards him . The same issue hadbeen raised by other staff council members , but left with no action taken against them. There is no question of developing animosity against him . Outsourcing is required and is being regularly done in order to provide manpower for the key activities since the target for coach production has been steadily going up and technology changing . It is in the absence of other feasible alternative to achieve the ends and also for having become inevitable for various reasons . On account of outsourcing no staff has been rendered surplus. The stand of the petitioner is an attempt to give a public colour to an administrative action . It is not true to say that the petitioner is victimized on account of his opposition to outsourcing . For transfer of employees there does not warrant any opportunity of being heard on administrative exigency under the general conditions of service. In the letter dated 28-6-2005 what the petitioner has stated forhis request for a nearby posting is his family's circumstances as a ground evidencing his willingness to joinTirupati .Employees are transferred in and out of ICF ontheir requestor due to administrative exigency. There is no bond executed by the petitioner to serve only in the ICF. Rule-226 of IREC , Vol. I lays down thereto. Regarding denying of Casual Leave, wages etc. , crediting of leave is done on 1st of January and July. The petitioner was relieved

5. In the Rejoinder Statement filed by the petitioner itisfurther contended that it is not correct that the Petitioner Union has no live registration or that the workman is not anofficebearer of the Union. There was no urgency for his transfer or relief when he was under the Railway Hospital Sick List at IC F , Chennai -38 . Sensing mala fide intention in the transfer the same was questioned then and there by Union and request by the workman and all others to cancel thetransfer went in vain. On his request in connection with his hard hit circumstances of financial crisis after his recent marriage , he was posted at Tirupati at Production Control Office in a non - incentive post with no benefit of incentive bonus . Request for change of transfer was addressed to Railway Minister and not to the Railway Board. The request was to retain him at ICF , Chennai . On thataspect, the Respondent is misleading. He was posted onlyat LocoWorks , Perambur that too only on 20-9-2006. The workman had opposed outsourcing and succeeded, which no other staff council member could. The ICF administration targeted him who was a Staff Council Member. His transfer order is born out of vengeance and mala fide and ulterior motive and is not real or genuine or foradministrative exigency . ICF has not so far revealed the real reasonbehind the transfer . Staff Council is constituted for avoiding power excesses and misuse of delegated powers . It is not correct to say that the Respondent is at full liberty to take their own decision despite objection . As Against total number of workmen of 16342 in 1982, in 2007 it isonly 13145 workmen to produce 1200 coaches . In spite [भाग II-खंड 3( ii)]

6551

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

ICF, Chennai to Patiala with the post on the alleged reason of"administrative interest " . The reluctance of the Ministry ofLabour and Employment to refer the dispute on the ground that transfer is a prerogative of the government was overcome by obtaining an order from the High Court ofMadrasby filing a writ. While the petitioner asserts that thetransfer of the workman is vitiated on the ground of mala fides . The Respondent would keenly contend that the transfer is only on administrative exigency and it is onlyprerogative to transfer its employees in the interest of administration. Admittedly the workman was a member of the StaffCouncil duly elected under an election process . It is also admitted that under ICF , the Staff Council constitutes the statutory body to negotiate with administration in matters connected with the carrying out of the business and administration under the ICF which is a production unit. The common case of both parties is that there was outsourcing. According to petitioner , outsourcing of regularworks resulted in rendering most valued machineries idle, staffbecoming surplus against which petitioner as StaffCouncilMember raised opposition. Qut ofmalicedue tothe said opposition of the workman he was transferred toPatialawithout following statutory norms under the guise ofsame being on administrative interest. The said transfer isassailed as illegal, inala fide and as done in colourable exercise ofpowers and therefore as vitiated. It is pointed outby the learned counsel for the petitioner that the fact that the workman was posted in Patiala in the Production Control Office shows absence of exigency ofservice. That office is not under the control of ICF . The transfer is challenged as not legal and justified.

of increasingworkload, the vacancies are not filled up .But outsourcing is resorted to by the administration for obvious reasons. Due to redeployment of workmen many machines go idle resulting in national loss . There occurred a lunch boycott by the employees for want ofjobs . Outsourcing resulted in labour crushing , machine idling , missing hours penalty to workmen , lack of promotion avenues , want of fresh recruitment, etc. Due to the intervention of the workman entrustment of perennial work to private contractor could be prevented and the core activity is at least saved. In the production units there is no permanent negotiatingmachinery and the Tribunal is attempted to be misled. There is slow attempt to privatize ICF. It is denied that no outsourcing activity has been carried out in the main assembly shop . The workman was transferred with mala fide intention since he opposed outsourcing. He is an ordinary workman without any special skill . There is no need or exigency for transferring him especially when other specially skilled workers are available in ICF. There is no necessityto post the workman in a non -production control office.RailwayBoard does notknow him as an extraordinary workmansuitable for exigency of service on transfer . His transfer is occasioned at the instance of the ICF Administration . After causing transfer of the workman, the Respondent is unleashing false reasons to justify it. The workman had made repeated representation to retain him back at ICF , Chennai . He requested by way of appeal only to the Hon'ble Minister for Railways . He never sought for transfer other than to ICF. The workman had explained in a lettertothe Minister for Railways regarding mala fides in his transfer. The fact that he was transferred to loco works at Perambur only shows clear mala fide intention . His request to issue a copy of the Railway Board letter No. E(NG) ( 1051 )/TR/ 14 dated 7-9-2006 to enable him under- stand the confusion in his transfer was not respondedto. The transfer is vitiated and was effected with mala fides .

6. Points for consideration are:

(i) Whether the successive transfers of the employeeto Patiala and there from toTirupathi along with the post in administrative interest is legal and justified ?

(ii) To what relief the workman is entitled?

7. Evidence in this ID consists of the testimony of WW1 and WW2 and Ex . W1 to W43 on the side of the petitioner and the testimony of MW and Ex . M1 to Ex .M4 on the side of the Respondent .

9. The contra contentions of the Respondents are thatinere opposing of outsourcing by the petitioner is not at all a ground todevelop animosity towards the workman. StaffCouncil is only an advisory bodywhose advice is not to be implemented . Outsourcing is resorted to due to inevitable reasons. There is no any prejudice occasioned to anybody due to outsourcing . Attempt of the workman is togive a public colour to an administrative action. The petitioner is not victimized on account ofhis opposition to outsourcing.Employees are transferred in and out of ICF ontheir request or due to administrative exigency. There is nobonded obligation by petitioner to work in ICF only. He having had requested for the change of transfer before actuallyjoining at Patiala, he was thereafter transferredto Tirupathi and subsequently to Loco Works , Perambur near to ICF, both of which are nearby separated by a common compound wall and thereby not rendering any inconvenience to him by reason of change ofhis place of employment.

Point No. 1

8. The present reference is in the wake of an Industrial Dispute raised before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Central) , Chennai challenging the transfer ofthe workman, G. Sridhar , Technician Grade-I , Fitter (General),

10. Form the pleadings of either parties narrated above and the evidence adduced the following emerge as admitted facts . The concerned workman was a duly elected Member of the Staff Council . There was outsourcing of machines and the workman as member of StaffCouncil and 6552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3( ii ) ] a member of registered Trade Union opposed the outsourcing to safeguard the interest of himself and his counterparts.There was an order oftransfer oftheworkman from ICF, Chennai initially to Patiala thereafter to Tirupathi and again to Loco Works at Perambur , Chennai . Though , the workman was given successive transfers after the impugned initialtransfer to Patiala twice and third onebeing to Loco Works, Perambur in Chennai , he has not been favoured with a re- transfer back to ICF itself.

was mala fide and was in colourable exercise of powers . Though the Management was out to give a re - transferto the workman to Chennai , its reluctance to post him at ICF itself is indicative of the fact that the transfer is due to nothing but the outcome ofmala fide intention in colourable exercise ofpower and an actual victimization of him. While the order ofhis transfer is explained with reason couched inthe terminology " administrative interest" and when the very same ground is the crux of dispute in this case the Management has not come forward to expand the meaning ofthe said "administrative interest " by disclosing what is that administrative interest. Though generally an order of transfer, is prerogative of the government and it is only necessary to state the ground of a transfer in an abstract manner couched in the phraseologies as above when once the legality, propriety, regularity and fairness of the same ground are assailed it is the bounden duty of the Respondent/Management to elucidate the ground by giving necessary explanation to the same so as to convince all concerned and this Tribunal that the transfer is really due to administrative interest or exigency . But the Management has so far not come forward to divulge what the administrative ground is. Another notable point is that the workman had to be relieved forthwith when he was on sick list at ICF , Chennai - 38 . It is for the Management to explain what was the urgency for it to visit the workman with a sudden transfer followed by a sudden relieffromthe office ofhispost, prior to the impugned transfer. Still another point against the respondent is that it has actually tried to misleadthis Tribunal by saying that the workman wanted a transfer only to Chennai whereas it is clearly proved that the workman wanted to be retained in ICF itself.

11. In the above background , it is germane to consider whether the transfer of the workman from ICF, Chennai to any place whatever has been one effected due to administrative interest as claimed by the Respondent Administration or whether the same has been one actuated bymalice,mala fides and in colourable exercise ofpowers inorderto victimize him and to keep him away from ICF who raised opposition against outsourcing done by the administration. The keen contention of the Respondent administrationwhile is that the raising of any opposition against outsourcing is not a reason for the administration tobehostile towards him so as to place him remotely by effecting a mala fide transfer to him whereas accordingto thepetitioner his transfer is out of mala fide intention and iswith a viewto victimize him since he has been opposing outsourcing. While again according to the Respondent Administration , other Staff Council Members had also opposed outsourcing but they have not been transferred bytheManagement. But according to the petitioner, there havebeen previous transfers given to such of thembut he is not in a position to clearly mention those instances specifically. All along the Respondent/Management has beenattempting to make out a case that there has not been anyvictimization against the workman by way of transfer for any reason whatever other than administrative . exigency.According to it, the Respondent/Management was always out to favour him. They cite his re-transfer to Tirupathi and thereafter to Loco Works , Perambur at Chennai as matters which would tend to show that it is always favourably disposed towards the workman. But according to the petitioner , the Respondent/Management ismeting out hostile treatment towards the workman because of his union activities and his action as a Staff Council Member in connection with the opposition to outsourcing. They would cite specific instances such as thatwhile the workman was only an ordinary worker with no special skill in the ICF, there is no reason whyhe himself wastransferred from ICF when other skilled workmen were available in the ICF. Again the transfer of the workman from ICF to Patiala and thereafter to other places is disadvantageous to him for the reason that there he is not entitled to incentive bonus , those being not production units . ICF is admittedly a production unit. The fact that the workmanwas posted at Loco Works , Perambur near to ICF which is separated by a common compound wall would well convince the fact that the transfer of the workman

12. Though the Management is out to make itbelieve that the transfer is one effected on the grounds of administrative interest it could be found to be not so . Though an enquiry was launched against the workman by issuing a charge memo in the meantime he has been visited withthe impugned transfer . The Management did not wait for the outcome of the enquiry . A transfer unless shown to be an outcome of mala fide exercise of power by the authority is always to be upheld. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision of the Apex Court in (1986) 4 SCC 131 B. VARADHA RAO VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS wherein the Apex Court has held that " It is an accepted principle that in public service transfer is an incident of service . It is also an implied condition of service and appointing authority has a wide discretion inthe matter . The Government is the best judge to decide how to distribute and utilize the services of its employees .However, this power must be exercised honestly, bonafide and reasonably. It should be exercised in public interest. If the exercise of power is based on extraneous considerations or for achieving an alien purpose or an oblique motive it would amount to mala fide and colourable exercise of power. Frequent transfers , without sufficient 6553 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24 , 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

hereby set aside. The Respondent/Management is ordered to re-transfer the workman to ICF , Chennai with post forthwith. No order as to costs .

15. The reference is answered accordingly.

(Dictatedto the P.A. , transoribed and typed by him, connected and pronounced by me in the open Court on thisday the 16th September, 2009) .

A. N. JANARDANAN, Presiding Officer

Witnesses Examined :

For the I Party/Petitioner : WW1 , Sri G. Sridhar

WW2, Sri V. Muralimahoharan

Forthe II Party/Petitioner : MW1 , Sri R. Sivakumar

Documents Marked:

Onthe Petitioner's side

Ex. No. Date Description

(3)

(1)

(2)

Ex. WI 14-09-2002 Copy of circular issued by the Respondent results regarding results ofStaff Council Election.

Ex. W2 XXX Copy of Photo Identity Card issued to Shri G. Sridhar as Staff Council Member .

Ex.W3 20-11-2003 Copy of circular issued by the Respondent regarding Off loading/ redeployment .

Ex. W4 31-01-2004 Copy of letter from Shri G. Sridhar to the Respondent regarding Prevention of Contract System in Shop 21 and 22.

Ex. W5 XXX

reasons tojustify such : transfers , cannot, but be held as mala fide . A transfer is mala fide when it is made not for professed purpose, such as in normal course or in public oradministrative interest or in the exigencies or servicebut forotherpurpose, than is to accommodate another person forundisclosed reasons. It is the basic-principle ofrule of law and good administration , that even administrative actions should be just and fair" . He further relied onthe decision of the High Court of Madras in C. RAMANATHAN VS. ACTING ZONAL MANAGER FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS wherein itheldthat "Courts are chary to interfere with an order of transfer made for administrative reasons . An innocuous order oftransfer, which not only on the face of its appears tobe one made in order to further administrative interests ofan organization, but which even on a deeper scrutiny does notpose any irregular or mala fide exercise ofpower by the concerned authority, is generally upheld by Civil Courts, as Courts cannot substitute their own opinion and interferewith ordinary orders of transfer of employees or established organizations . But if in a given case, an order oftransfer appears to be deliberate attempt to by pass all disciplinarymachinery and offend the well- known principle ofaudialteramparterm if ex facie it is clear that the order of transfer was not made for administrative reasons but was made to achieve collateral purpose, then it is open to the Courttocrack the shell of innocuousness which wraps the order oftransfer and by piercing such a veil, find out the rival purpose behind the order of transfer. No doubt, a normal order oftransfer can be misunderstood as a punitive measure. But, if the circumstances surrounding such an order leads to a reasonable inference by a well- instructed mind, that such an order was made in the colourable exercise ofpower and intended to achieve a sinister purpose and based on irrelevant considerations, then the arm of the Court canbe extended so as to decipher the intendment of the order and set it aside on the ground that it is one made with a design and motive or circumventing disciplinary action and, particularly when civil servant is involved, to avoid the stringent but mandatory procedure prescribed in Article311 (2) ofthe Constitution of India" .

Copyofrepresentation from Staff CouncilMembers to Respondent regarding Prevention ofContract System in Shop 21 and 22.

28-02-2005

Ex.W6

Copy of letter from Sri N. Dorai , Staff Council Member to Res- pondent regarding reconstitution of SBF Committee for the year 2005.

13. The foregoing discussion leads me to the conclusion that the impugned transfer of the workman is not a legal or a valid one though it is couched as one made on administrative interest. It could be seen to be done on mala fides and in victimization ofthe workman in colourable exercise ofpowers as a substitute for disciplinary action. The said transfer of the workman is not justified and the same is vitiated. The same is liable to be set aside and I do 30.

18-06-2005

Ex .W7

Point No. 2

Copy of transfer order issued to Shri G. Sridhar to Patiala.

"To what relief the concerned workman is entitled ?"

20-06-2005

Ex. W8

Copy of letter from Sri N. Durai to Respondent regarding Transfer of Sri G. Sridhar.

14. Resultantly, the transfer of the workman from ICF, Chennai is held not legal and justified and the same is

3689G1/09-24 6554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

(1)

(3)

(2)

(3)

(2)

(1)

Ex. W9 .

Ex. W26 14-07-2005

20-06-2005

Copy ofOffice Order No. 57/2005 issued by the Respondents regarding interRailwayTransfer.

Copy of letter from Petitioner to the Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Chennai .

Ex. W27 18-07-2005

21-06-2005

Ex.W10

Copy ofLetter from Sri G. Sridhar to Respondents regarding cancellation ofleave .

Copy ofLetter from StaffCouncil Membersto Chairman, Railway Board regarding transfer ofSri G. Sridhar.

24-05-2009

Ex.W28

Ex .W11 21-06-2005

Copy of Letter from CWM, CRS , Tirupati to SriG. Sridhar regarding transfergrant.

Copy of letter from Sri G. Sridhar to the Respondent regarding transfer.

24-05-2006

Ex .W29

02-07-2005

Ex. W12

Copy ofletter from Sri G. Sridhar to WPO , CRS, Tirupati regarding availing transfer grant.

Copy of transfer order issued to SriG. SridhartoTirupathi.

25-08-1989

Ex. W30

Ex. W13 07-07-2005

Copy ofRegistration Certificate of the Petitioner Union.

Copy of letter from Respondent to Sri G. Sridhar.

Ex. W31 XXXX

Ex. W14 14-07-2005

CopyofBye- laws ofthe Petitioner Union.

Ex. W32 13-11-2004

Copy of Office Order issued by CWM, Personnel Branch, Carriage Repair Shop , Tirupathi.

Copy of Minutes of the General BodyMeeting.

Ex. W15 18-07-2005

Ex.W33 03-12-2004 Copy of Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting of the PetitionerUnion .

Copy of letter from Petitioner to Asstt . Labour Commissioner (Central) , Chennai raising Industrial Dispute .

Ex. W34 2005

Copyoflist oftheMembers ofthe Petitioner Union.

Ex. W35 2005

Ex.W16 04-08-2005 Copy of memorandum issued by CWM, Personnel Branch, Carriage Repair Shop, Tirupathi imposing punishment on Sri G. Sridhar .

Copyof list ofOffice-bearers of Petitioner Union .

Ex. W17 09-08-2005

31-05-2005

Ex. W36

Copy of Letter from Petitioner Union to the Hon'ble Union Ministry for Railways .

Copy of Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting of the Petitioner Union .

Ex. W18 19-08-2005

Ex. W37 14-08-2007

Copy of letter from Petitioner to Labour the Regional Commissioner (C) , Chennai .

Copy ofRegistration Certificate of the Petitioner Union regarding changeofname.

14-08-2007

25-09-2006

Ex.W38

Ex .W19

Copy of letter from Sri G. Sridhar to CWM, Loco Works , Perambur.

Ex. W20 17-10-2006

Copy of letter from Deputy Commissisoner of Labour - I , Chennai enclosing amendment of Bye-laws.

Copy of letter from Second Party enclosingEnquiryReport.

21-05-2005

Ex. W39

Ex .W21 24-08-2006

Copy ofMedical Certificate issued by IFCHospital .

Copy of letter from Second Party enclosing Enquiry Report .

16-05-2003

Ex. W40

Ex. W22 08-05-2006 Copy of Enquiry Report.

Ex. W23 31-05-2005 Copy of Extract from Dina Thanthi Newspaper.

Copy of Memorandum of ICF format regarding Standard Form of Charge-sheet following Rule- 9 of the Railway Servants (Discipline andAppeal ) Rules , 1968 .

Ex . W24 XXXX

Ex. W41 22-02-2005

Copy ofLast Pay Certificate ofSri G. Sridhar.

Ex. W25 09-05-2005

Copy of memorandum of ICF format regarding Standard Form of Memorandum of Charges for imposing minor penalties .

Copy of Enquiry Notice issued to Sri G. Sridhar and others .

6555 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

ANNEXURE

(2)

(3)

(1)

Ex. W42 23-01-2004

Others to the Respondent. Copy of letter from Petitioner and

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM-LABOUR.COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI Ex.W43 04-08-2005

I.D. No. 43/2006

Copy of Charge Memorandum issuedto Sri G. Sridhar .

.Workman

Shri Rambir S/o Sh. Bolaram,

Through Shri P.L. Srivastava,

OntheManagement's side

C.B.-280, RingRoad,

Date

Ex. No.

Naraina, NewDelhi- 110028

Description

Vrs.

Ex. M1 28-06-2006 Copy of request for change of transfer ordered.

Management

M/ s. Spice Jet Ltd. , Pt. No. 319,

Ex .M2 09-08-2005

TheGeneralManager, Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar,

Copy of request for change of transferorder.

Gurgaon,Haryana

AWARD

Ex. M3 07-02-2009 Copy of authorization letter given to Sri R. Sivakumar for letting in evidence on behalf of the Respondent in the ID.

Ex. M4 06-12-2005 Copy of Drawal of PLB for the year2004-2005 in favour ofSriG. Sridhar. Emp No. 696790 transferred from ICF to CRs , Tirupathi.

नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर, 2009

Shri Rambirwas working as Loader in Modiluft Ltd., which became scheduled Air Transport Service since 1993, when air transport service permit was issued to it by Director General of Civil Aviation . It was functioning with the support of technical know -how being provided by M/s. Lufthansa. In the year 1996 agreement between Modiluft Ltd. and M/ s . Lufthansa was terminated and DirectorGeneral of Civil Aviation did not renew its permit to operate scheduled air transport service after 19-11-96. Till23-5-05 airline operations ofModiluft Ltd. were not in existence. On account of ceasure of airline operations , services of Shri Rambir came to an end .

2. An industrial dispute was raised by Rambirbefore the Conciliation Officer. Conciliation proceedings failed. AppropriateGovernment vide its Order No. L- 11012/48/ 2006- IR(CM-I) dated 28-8-2006 has referred the disputeto this Tribunal for adjudication with following terms of reference:

का. आ. 2946.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्पाईसजेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 43/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11012/48/2006- आई आर (सीएम-1) ] स्नेह लता जवास , डेस्क अधिकारी

"Whether the action ofthe Management of Modiluft/ Royal Airways /Spice Jet Ltd. , in terminating the services of Shri Rambir , S/o Sh . Bolaram w.e.f. 1-1-02 isjust, fair and legal ? If not, to what relief is the concernedworkman entitled and from which date . ? " New Delhi , the 25th September , 2009

S.O. 2946. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 43/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrialdispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of M/s, Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009 .

3. Workman filed claim statement, pleading therein that he worked as Loader with the management till 1-1-2002. According to him he joined services ofModiluft in 1993. He was transferred to M/ s Royal Airways and lastlyto M/ s . Spice Jet Limited. On 1-1-02 , he was sent out ofthe job without any notice or payment of retrenchment compensation . Notice of the demand was sent to the management, which was not responded to by the management . He claims his reinstatement in the services with continuity and full back wages .

[No. L- 11012/48/2006- IR (CM - 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS, Desk Officer

4. The management demurred the claim of the workmanpleading therein that when air line operations of 6556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)]

there is noquestion of adjudication ofthe fact that services ofRambir were terminated on 1-1-02 and there was no justifiability, fairness and legality in that action. The issue is accordingly answered against the workman to the effect thathis services came to an end on 19-11-96 . He is not entitledto any relief from the management. The reference isanswered accordingly. Itbe sent to the appropriate government for publication.

09-09-2009 Dr. R.K. YADAV, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 25 सितम्बर, 2009

Modiluft Limited came to an end on 19-11-96 , Rambir abandoned the services . His services came to an end on that very day. Airline business was not done by the management till 23-5-05 , the date when airlines operations commenced again. It has been claimed that since the company was inoperative between 1996 to May, 05there was no question of employing/ terminating services ofthe workman on 1-1-02 . Airline operations commenced-again with the name ofSpice Jet on 23-5-05 , after issue of new permitby the DG Staff on 17-5-05 . Spice Jet Limited came into existence w.e.f. 23-5-05; consequent to the change in the name of the management. Under these circumstances, there is no substance in the claim filed by Shri Rambir. His services came to an end on 19-11-96, when permit to operate scheduled air transport services was not renewed by the DG Civil Aviation.

का. आ. 2947.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार स्पाईस जेट लि. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 66/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-11012/59/2006- आई आर ( सी -1 ) ] स्नेह लता जवास, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 25th September , 2009 5. Workman abandoned the proceedings .Notice was sent to the workman by registered post calling upon him to prosecute his clann . Postal article was received back with the report that the addressee has left the given address forgood. Noticewas sent tohim through P.L. Srivastava, CB280, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi , the address provided by the appropriate Government in terms of reference. Since the workman was not available at the said address nor Sh. Srivastava responded to the notice issued by the Tribunal , under these circumstances the Tribunal could not lay its hand over the workman to call him to prosecutehis claim.

S.O. 2947. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 66/ 2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s . Spice Jet Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L- 11012/59/2006- IR(C- 1 ) ] SNEH LATA JAWAS , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 66/2006

Shri Ram Prasad, S/o Sh. Vijay Yadav, Through Shri P.L. Srivastava, C.B. -280, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi- 110028 Workman

Vrs.

.. Management

TheGeneral Manager , M/s. Spice Jet Ltd. , Pt . No. 319, Phase- IV, Udyog Vihar , Gurgaon, Haryana

6.AffidavitofShri Sanjay Sharma was filed onbehalf ofthemanagement. He gave confirmation to facts pleaded bythe management in its written statement. To substantiate the stand ofthe management , Shri Sanjay Sharma proved copyofpermitdated 20-11-99 , its renewal dated 17-11-95, copy of resolution, dated 28-2-2001 , copy of permit to operate scheduled transport service (Passenger) dated 9-5-06 and copy offresh certificate of incorporation issued, consequent upon change of name . Out of the facts sworn by Shri Sharma and the documents referred above , it came to light that airline operations of Modiluft Limited came to an end on 19-11-96 when permit to operate scheduled air transport service was not renewed by the DG Civil Aviation. Airline operations were re-commenced by the company with the name ofSpice Jet Limited on 25-5-05, after issue of new permit on 17-5-05 . Spice Jet came into existence on 23-5-05 consequent to the change in the name of the management . All these facts make it clear that in January, 2002 airline operations were not in vogue . Under these circumstances it is apparent that there was no opportunity any situation for Rambir to work as Loader with the management. Consequently it is evident that Rambir has not been able to show that he was in service of the management till 1-1-02. Airline operations commenced again only in May, 2005. All these facts are suggestive that the appropriate government made the reference in the mechanical manner . Rambir was not in service of the management in January, 2002. Under these circumstances 6557 [ भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

AWARD

5.Workman abandoned the proceedings .Noticewas sentto theworkman by registered post calling upon him to prosecutehis claim . Postal article was received back with thereport that the addressee has left the given address for good. Notice was sent to him through P.L. Srivastava, CB 280, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi, the address provided bytheappropriate Government in terms ofreference . Since the workman was not available at the said address nor Sh. Srivastava responded to the notice issued by the Tribunal , under these circumstances the Tribunal could not lay its hand over the workman to call him to prosecute hisclaim.

Shri Ram Prasad was working as Loader inModiluft Ltd.,which became scheduled Air Transport Service since 1993, when air transport service permit was issued to itby DirectorGeneral ofCivil Aviation. It was functioning with the support of technical know- how being provided by M/s. Lufthansa. In the year 1996 agreement between Modiluft Ltd. and M/ s . Lufthansa was terminated and DirectorGeneral of Civil Aviation did not renew its permit tooperate scheduled air transport service after 19-11-96. Till 23-5-05 airline operations of Modiluft Ltd. were not in existence. On account of ceasure of airline operations, services of Shri Ram Prasad came to an end.

2. An industrial dispute was raised by Ram Prasad before the Conciliation Officer. Conciliation proceedings failed.AppropriateGovernment vide its Order No. L- 110012/ 59/2006-' IR( CM-I) dated 28-8-2006 has referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication with following terms of reference:

"Whether the action of the Management of Modiluft/RoyalAirways /Spice Jet Ltd. , New Delhi interminating the services of Shri Ram Prasad, S/o Sh. Vijay Yadav w.e.f. 1-1-02 is just, fair and legal? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from which date ?"

3.Workman filed claim statement, pleading therein that he worked as Loader with the management till 1-1-2002. According to him he joined services ofModiluft in 1993. He was transferred to M/ s Royal Airways and lastlytoM/s . Spice Jet Limited. On 1-1-02 , he was sent out ofthejob without any notice or payment of retrenchment compensation. Notice of the demand was sent to the management , which was not responded to by the management. He claims his reinstatement in the services with continuityand full backwages.

6. Affidavit of Shri Sanjay Sharma was filed on behalf of management. He gave confirmation to facts pleadedby the management in its written statement. To substantiate the stand of the management, Shri Sanjay Sharmaproved copy of permit dated 20-11-99, its renewal dated 17-11-95, copy of resolution, dated 28-2-2001 , copy of permit to operate scheduled transport service (Passenger) dated 9-5-06 and copy of fresh certificate of incorporation issued, consequent upon change of name. Outofthe facts sworn by Shri Sharma and the documents referred above, it came to light that airline operations of Modiluft Limited came to an end on 19-11-96 when permit tooperatescheduled air transport service was not renewed by the DG Civil Aviation. Airline operations were re- commenced by the company with the name of Spice Jet Limited on 25-5-05, after issue ofnew permit on 17-5-05. SpiceJet came into existence on 23-5-05 consequenttothe change in the name of the management. All these facts make it clear that in January , 2002 airline operations were not in vogue . Under these circumstances it is apparent that there was no opportunity any situation for Ram Prasad towork as Loader with the management . Consequently it is evident that Ram Prasad has not been able to show that hewas in service of the management till 1-1-02 . Airline operations commenced again only in May, 2005. All these facts are suggestive that the appropriate government made.. the reference in the mechanical manner . Ram Prasad was not in serviceof the management in January, 2002. Under these circumstances there is no question of adjudication ofthe fact that services of Ram Prasad were terminated on 1-1-02 and there was nojustifiability, fairness and legality inthat action. The issue is accordingly answered against the workman to the effect that his services came to an end on 19-11-96. He is not entitled to any relief from the management. The reference is answered accordingly . Itbe sent to the appropriate government for publication .

09-09-2009

Dr. R.K. YADAV, PresidingOfficer

नईदिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2948.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार विक्टोरिया वेस्ट कोलियरी, बी.सी. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके 4. The management demurred the claim of the workmanpleading therein that when air line operations of Modiluft Limited came to an end on 19-11-96, Ram Prasad abandoned the services . His services came to an end on that very day. Airline business was not done by the management till 23-5-05 , the date when airlines operations, commenced again. It has been claimed that since the companywas inoperative between 1996 to May, 05 there was no question of employing/ terminating services ofthe workman on 1-1-02 .Airline operations commenced again with the name of Spice Jet on 23-5-05, after issue ofnew permitby the DG Staff on 17-5-05. Spice Jet Limited came into existence w.c.f. 23-5-05, consequent to the change in the name of the management. Under these circumstances, there is no substance in the claim filed by Shri Ram Prasad. His services came to an end on19-11-96, when permit to operate scheduled air transport services was not renewed bythe DG Civil Aviation.

6558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009 /KARTIKA 2 , 1931

कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 124/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/263/2004- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi, the 29th September , 2009 S.O. 2948. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 (14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 124/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to themanagement of Victoria West Colliery of M/ s . BCCL, and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L- 22012/263/2004- IR( CM - II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT

SriManoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer Reference No. 124 of 2005

Parties : The Agent, Victoria West Colliery of M/s. BCCL , Barakar , Burdwan Vrs.

AreaWorking President, Janta Mazdoor Sangh (HMS) , Damagoria Colliery, Kalyaneswari , Burdwan REPRESENTATIVES

: None

Forthe management

: None

For the union (Workman)

Industry : Coal

State:West Bengal Dated the 29-07-2009

AWARD

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 263/2004- IR(CM - II) dated 28-09-2005 has been pleasedto refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management Victoria West Colliery of M/s . BCCL indismissing Shri Lilaram Satnami, U.G. Loader from Service vidé letter No. VWC/1204 /A/ 2001 / 220 dated 1-4-2002 is legal and justified? If not , to what relief the workmen is entitled?"

Afterhaving received the Order No. L- 22012/263/ 2004- IR(CM- II) dated 28-09-2005 of the above said reference from theGovt . of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 124 of 2005 was registered on 17-10-2005 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing themto appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned .

Theworkman nor his authorized representative nor the Union raising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement ofclaim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no relief. Hence .

ORDERED

Let an "Award" be and same is passed as per above . Send the copies of the order to the Govt . of India, Ministry ofLabour, new Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2949.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार नार्थदन रेलवे के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 169/2001 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल -41012/94/2001- आई आर ( बी-1 ) ] अजय कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी 6559 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

2. The reference under adjudication is :

New Delhi , the 29th September, 2009

"KyaSahayakAbhiyanta (Mukhyala),UttarRailway, CPC, Kanpur, dwara Shri Ram Sumer, Fitter ko dinank 6-4-2000 aprahan se anivarya roop se seva nivaratt kar rail sewa se prithak kiya jana hayyochit hai?Yadi nahi, to sambandhit karmkar kis anutosh ka hakdaar hai ?"

S.O. 2949. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 169/ 2001) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Northern Railway and their workman, which was received by the CentralGovernment on 29-9-2009.

[No. L-41012/94/2001- IR(B-I)] AJAY KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT

N.K. Purohit, PresidingOfficer

3. It isadmitted case of the parties that the workman, Ram Sumer was working under Senior Section Engineer (Works), NR, Kanpur in capacity of Fitter and was served upon a charge- sheet dated 05-12-98 by the Disciplinary Authority for unauthorized absence w.e.f. 22-05-98 to 10-11-98 . The Inquiry Officer after conducting the inquiry submitted his inquiry reported dated 22-02-2000 before Disciplinary Officer who imposed punishment of compulsory retirement upon workman vide impugned order dated 05-04-2000. Aggrieved from said punishment order the workman preferred an appeal before Appellate Authority, who rejected the same vide order dated 16-05-2000.

I.D. No. 169/2001

Ref. No. L-41012/94/2001- IR(B- I) dated : 15-11-2001

BETWEEN

Shri Ram Sumer , S/o Shri Sukhram C/ o Shri D.K. Jha, T-46, B, G.T. Road, Kanpur(U.P .)-4

AND

1 The Senior Engineer (Works) , Northern Railway, C.P.C. , Old Station, Kanpur(U.P. )-4

4. The workman in his statement ofclaim has alleged that the principles of natural justice were not observed during inquiry and he was not afforded proper opportunity to defend himself during inquiry as he was not given documents which form basis of charge sheet in spite of his demand nor was given opportunity to cross-examine the management's witness ; accordingly the departmental inquiry was illegal and contrary to Rules and the inquiry report dated 22-2-2000 was erroneous . The workman has also alleged that the Appellate Authority while rejecting his appeal has passed an unreasoned and non- speaking orderand accordingly, he has prayed that impugned order dated 05-04-2000 be set aside and workman be reinstated with back wages and continuity in service.

2. The Assistant Engineer (Chief) , Northern Railway, C.P.C., Old Station Kanpur(U.P .)-4 .

AWARD

Dated :14-9-2009

5. The management of Railways on the other hand has denied the allegations of the workman and has submittedthat the departmental inquiry was conducted in accordance with principles of natural justice , giving full and proper opportunity to the workman to defend himself andthere was nothing illegal with it . It has also submitted that the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and AppellateAuthority are justified and based on merit ofthe case and accordingly, has prayed that the claim of the workmanbe rejected with any reliefto him.

6. The workman union has filed rejoinder whereby he has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim andhas introduced nothing new.

1. By order No. L -41012/94.2001 - IR(B - 1 ) dated 15-11-2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) ofsub- section ( 1 ) and sub-section (2A) ofSection 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between Shri Ram Sumer, S/o Shri Sukhram, C/ o Shri D.K. Jha, T-46 , B, G.T. Road, Kanpur and the SeniorEngineer (Works) , Northern Railway, C.P.C. , Old Station, Kanpur and the Assistant Engineer (Chief) , Northern Railway , C.P.C. , Old Station, Kanpur for adjudication.

7. The management of the Railways has submitted photocopy of the entire enquiry proceedings in support oftheir case.The workman examined himselfwhereas the management examined Shri Lalit Kumar Singh, Sr. Section 6560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SBC. 3 ( ii) ] Engineer, Shri Vikas Chandra Nand, Section Engineer (Special) First and Shri B.N. Kushwaha, SSE/TMS R.K. Garg, Sr.Manager in support of their respective case.

8.After earing arguments of the parties, following orders dated 31-07-2006, deciding the fairness of the departmental inquiry were passed by this Tribunal , which reads as under :

fabricated and forged document. The workman was a habitual absentee and despite giving several warning by the railways he did not mend his ways and continued the misconduct on one pretext or the other . In cross-examination hehas stated that Dr. R.P. Jatav, Mavai, Fatehpur informed in-writing that the workman approached him to obain the sickand fitness memo on 22-05-98 and 10-11-98 respectively. He was not under his treatment. The said original letter C-41 is onthe record. As regard the period ofabsence, the copyofServiceBook has been produced. The statement ofthemanagement witness finds support on this fact from hisservicebook that the workman had remained absent for theperiodmentioned in the charge sheet.

"Icome to the conclusion that not only departmental proceedings were not prepared in order but the worker was not provided opportunity to cross- examine the management witness and the findings are beyond the scope of evidence available on record. The findings ofthe departmental enquiry is therefore setaside being perverse."

13. It is also pertinent to mention that a supplementary affidavit of Lalit Kumar Singh was submitted on21-03-2007 but the workman had not availed opportunity ofcross-examination on the said affidavit and subsequent tothe submission of additional affidavit, the workman has remained absent during proceedings and ex -parte or against workman was made vide order dated 13-08-2007 . In supplementary affidavit the management witness has referred two letters of Dr. R.P. Jatav dated 04-11-2006 and 16-03-2007, the copies of which have been enclosed along with affidavit, but the management has not produced dr . R.P. Jatav in evidence .

9. Accordingly, the opposite party was given opportunity toprove the charges before this Tribunal and datewas fixed for filing list of witness and documents by themanagement. Resultantly, the management of Railways fileddocumentary evidence and examined Shri Lalit Kumar Singh Sr. Section Engineer in support oftheir case whereas the workman did not adduce any evidence in spite of ample opportunity being extended to him and finally the casewas ordered to proceed ex -parte against the workman and the case was listed for arguments . The management filed its written arguments apart from oral submission .

10. Heard representative of the management only and perused entire evidence on record.

11. The workman was charge sheeted vide charge sheet dated 05-12-98 for the following misconduct :

14. The workman has not adduced any evidence in rebuttal of management's evidence . He himself has not come forward in rebuttal of management's evidence . In cross-examination of the management witness Shri Lalit Kumar Singh nothing has come on the basis of which his evidence may be discarded, therefore , on the basis of statement ofmanagement witness , Lalit Kumar Singh and documents filed in support of his statement, the charge against the workman stands proved.

15. The case was proceeding ex -parte against the workman and there is neither any pleading nor evidence of the workman that the punishment order is wholly disproportionate or he deserves any lesser punishment.

"Aap (Shri Ram Sumer) Adhinasth Khand Abhiyanta/ Karya/Pradhan/Kanpur apni duty se dinanak 22-5-98 se 10-11-98 tak anandhikrat roop se anupasthit rahe. Iske purva aap anupasthit hote rahe hain. Is tarah ke karvahi rail karmachari aacharan adhiniyam 1966 ke niyam 3.1 (I) ( II) va (III) ke virudh hai. "

16. Therefore , in view of the above discussion, the action of the railway administration to compulsory retire the workman w.e.f. 06-04-2000 is not unjustified . Resultantly, the workman is not entitled to any relief.

17. Award as above .

Lucknow:

N.K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer

14-09-2009

12. In order to prove the above charge the management has examined Shri Lalit Kumar Singh , Sr. SectionEngineer , HQ, NCR, Kanpur, who has stated in his statement on oath that the workman remained absent fromhis duty without any information to the Railways for period 22-05-98 to 10-11-98 . He has further stated that medical certificate said to be issued by Dr. R.P. Jatav is a 6561 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

increment. He appealed against the punishment, whichwas declined. He raised an industrial dispute before the ConciliationOfficer . Since conciliation proceedings failed, thedispute was referred to this Tribunal for adjudication by the appropriateGovernment, vide order No. L- 12012/ 44/2004- IR(B - II) , New Delhi, dated 3rd ofJune, 2004, with followingterms:

का. आ. 2950.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 30/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 *को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management ofUnion Bank of India in imposing the punishment of stoppage ofone annual increment on Shri R.K. Gupta, SpecialAssistant isjustified and legal? Ifnot, what relief is the concerned workman entitled to?" [सं. एल -12012/44/2004- आई आर ( बी-II ) ] राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi, the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2950. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/ 2004) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , NewDelhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009:

2.Workman filed his claim pleading therein that he was chargesheeted on 6-8-98. The Enquiry Officer opted notto supplyhim list of the documents or witnesses, which were to be proved and examined. The enquiry was conducted on one date. No opportunity was given to him todefend himself. The enquiry was in violation of the principles ofnatural justice. The Disciplinary Authority had not applied his mind to the facts and passed order of punishment in mechanical manner . TheAppellate Authority has alsodismissed his appeal arbitrarily. He claimed that the order of stoppage of one annual increment may be declared illegal.

[No. L- 12012/44/2004- IR (B- II)] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR.R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURTNO . 1 , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEXDELHI

I.D. No. 30/2004

Shri R.K.Gupta, (Through Union Bank Employees UnionUttaranchal ), Vill. & Post Kaulagarh, Opp. Govt. Inter College, Dehradun

Workman

Versus

Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India,

3. Contest was given to the claim pleading that the dispute has not been espoused by a union. It has further beenpleaded that the claim statement has not been signed by the workman or an office bearer of the union. It has beenpleaded that documents were supplied to Shri Gupta. It isnot disputed that the enquiry was conducted on one day. However, it has been pleaded that one witness was examined by the management and opportunity was given to the workman to cross examine him . Thereafter the workman had examined three witnesses in his defense . He wasgivenampleopportunity to defend himself. The Enquiry Officer had recorded findings, which are in consonance withthe principles ofnatural justice. Opportunity of being heardwas given to the workman and thereafter, punishment ofstoppage of one annual increment was imposed on him . His appeal was heard and disposed of by the Appellate Authority. Thus it is clear that the delay in disposal ofthe appeal has not caused any prejudice to the workman. The management asserts that the claim is liable to be dismissed.

RajpurRoad, Dehradun.

Management

AWARD

4. Noticewas sent to the workman to appear before the Tribunal on 25-5-09 . It was sent by registered post throughUnionBank Employees Union, Uttaranchal, Village and Post Kaulagarh, opposite. Government Inter College , Dehradun, the address provided by the workman in his claim petition. The notice was returned back with the remarks that the addressee was not available at the given address .

5. Notice was again sent to the workman to appear before the Tribunal and prosecute his claim on 19-6-09 . It Shri R.K. Gupta was working as Head Cashier at Sherpur Khelmau branch of Union Bank of India. On 12-6-98 he went to fetch cash ofRs . 2 lacs from Roorkee branch of the bank. He reached there , obtained cash from the cashier, kept it in a bag and left it unattended. He lost the bag, containing money . Accordingly he was charge sheeted. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and recorded a finding against Shri Gupta. The Disciplinary Authorityawarded punishment of stoppage of one annual

3689G1 /09-25 6562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] was also sentby registered post. It was also returned with the same remarks . Therefore , the Tribunal could not lay its hands on the workman to call upon him to prosecute his claim.

Government hereby publishes theAward (Ref. No. 5/2006) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 , New Delhi now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Union Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L- 12012/ 152/2005 -IR (B- II) ] RAJINDER KUMAR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV , PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRAL GOVT . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT NO . 1 , NEW DELHI, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 5/2006

Shri Mahender Singh ( now deceased) , S/ o Jug Lal , r / o H.No. 434/35, Now 375/35 , Balmiki Basti , Janta Colony , Rohtak through Hiswife Shakuntala being legal heir

Workman

and successor

Versus

1. Union Bank of India ,

Through its Chief Manager , Regional Office , Union Bank ofIndia, Gole Market, Bhagat Singh Place , Connaught Place, NewDelhi

2. Branch Manager , UnionBank of India new Railway Road,

Bhim Nagar Chowk,

Management

Gurgaon(Haryana)

Out of facts pleaded by the workman and those projected by the management in its written statement, it came to light that on 12-6-98 the workman was negligent in handling the bag , containing cash ofRs . 2 lacs . He lost the bag and caused loss of Rs . 2 lacs to the bank . He was charge sheeted and departmental proceedings were initiated. TheEnquiry Officer examined one witness, namely, Shri Rawat. Workman examined three witnesses in his defence. Workman could not dispute that he went to Roorkee branch of the hank on 12-6-98 , collected cash of Rs . 2 lacs , kept it in a bag. He also failed to dispute that he left the bag unattended and lost the money . Therefore, out of facts projected by the parties it is evident that the workman was negligent and for that misconduct he was proceededdepartmentally. The Enquiry Officer gave proper opportunities to the workman to cross examine management witness and to examine witness in his defense . He recorded findings against him, copy of which proceedings were supplied to the workman . The workman made representation against the findings and was given personal hearing by the Disciplinary Authority . Thereafter punishment of stoppage of one annual increment was passed against him. He appealed against the punishment, which appeal was declined . All these events make it evident that the principles of natural justice were followed . Punishment, awarded to the workman , being reasonableness and justifiability in the action of the Disciplinary Authority. No interference is called for with the punishment . Accordingly it is concluded that the workman has not been able to show a case justifying interference with the punishment awarded . An award is accordingly passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for its publication.

AWARD

Dated: 18-9-99

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

• नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2951.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सं. 1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 5/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-12012/152/ 2005- आई. आर. ( बी- II ) ]

राजेन्द्र कुमार, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2951. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central

Mahender Singh was employed as full time sweeper atGurgaon branch of Union Bank of India . He was in the habit of remaining absent unauthorisedly . Charge sheet was served upon him and one increment was stopped for aperiodofsix months without cumulative effect, vide order dated 15-6-2001 , for remaining absent unauthorisedly for 171 days on various dates during the period from 7-8-2000 to24-5-2001 . He did not mend his ways and punishment of stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect was imposed upon him , vide order dated 17-10-2002 , for remaining absent unauthorisedly for 259 days on various dates between 25-6-01 to 5-7-02. There was no improvement andpunishment of reduction of two stages in time scale of paywas imposed upon him, vide order dated 18-9-2003, for remaining unauthorisedly absent for 91 days on various datesbetween 5-8-02 to 18-5-03 . He again absented himself from duties for 113 days on various dates between 2-9-03 6563 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

punishment ofcompulsory retirement was awarded to him, after considering his entire service records . Claim filed by his widow is liable to be dismissed.

4. None appeared on behalf of the management on 10-6-09 as well as on 30-7-09 . The matter was proceeded under Rule 22 of the Industrial Disputes ( Central ) Rules 1957 ( in short the Rules ) . Smt. Shakuntla had examined herselfinsupport of the claim . She raised her submissions in the matter through Shri B.K. Prasad . I have given my careful consideration to the arguments advanced at the barand cautiously perused the record . My findings on the issues involved in the controversy are as follows :

to 25-3-04. A charge sheet was served upon him and Shri Ravi Khanna was appointed as Enquiry Officer . Mahender Singhappearedbefore the Enquiry Officer alongwith Shri S.K. Brar , his defense representative and pleaded guiltyto thecharges . The Enquiry Officer recorded his plea ofguilty, andheld him guilty vide his findings dated 7-8-04. The DisciplinaryAuthority issued a show cause notice, calling uponMahender Singh to explain as to why punishment of compulsory retirement, may not imposed on him . He was heardandtheDisciplinary Authority awarded punishment ofcompulsory retirement vide his order dated 7-8-2004. An industrial dispute was raised before the Conciliation Officer. Since conciliation proceedings failed, the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, vide order No. L- 12012/ 152 /2005 - IR (B- II) , New Delhi dated 24-2-2006, with the following terms :

"Whether the action of the management of Union Bank of India to terminate the workman Shri Mahender Singh s/ o Jug Lal , Full time Sweeper by way of compulsory retirement w.e.f. 7-8-04 is just and legal? If not to what relief the workman is entitled?"

5. Smt. Shakuntla deposed that Mahender Singh was her husband, who was working in Ghaziabad Branch of Union Bank of India, as Sweeper . She was married to Mahender Singh about 16 years ago. At the time of her marriage Mahender Singh was working in Rohtak branch ofthe bank. From Rohtak Branch he was transferred to Ghaziabad Branch of the bank , where he worked continuously.Mahender Singh had expired, copy of whose death certificate is Ex. WW1 / 1 . On the date of his death he was notworking with the bank. His services were terminated by the bank three years prior to his death . No notice was served on Mahender Singh by the management . At the time of termination of service nothing was paid to him . Pension was not sanctioned in his favour. After termination till his death Mahender Singh remained unemployed.

2. Since theworkman expired on 2-12-05, even prior tothe referencebeing made to this Tribunal , Smt. Shakuntala. wife ofMahender Singh filed the claim statement. She pleaded that Mahender Singh was serving as full time sweeper at Ghaziabad Branch ofUnion Bank of India, since 14-3-2000. When drastic penalty was imposed upon him , no opportunity of being heard was provided . No opportunitytodefend himself was given to her husband in the alleged enquiry proceedings. No documents were supplied to him. He was deceived, when his signatures were obtained on certain papers , on the pretext of pardon beinggranted to him. She presents that order ofcompulsory retirement dated 7-8-04 is based on no evidence and liable tobediscarded. She claims that the management may be ordered to pay arrears of his back wages with interest to hisheirs.

6. As per Ex. WW1 / 1 Mahender Singh expired on 2-12-05. The present dispute was referred to this Tribunal on24-2-2006. Therefore, it is evident Mahender Singh met his death much prior to the dispute, being referred to this Tribunal for adjudication . Question for consideration comes as to whether there was any dispute existing or apprehended, which could be referred to this Tribunal for adjudication . For an answer to this proposition one has to see the definition of " industrial dispute " . Clause (k) of Section 2 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) , defines industrial disputes , which definition is extractedthus :-

"Industrial dispute" means any dispute or difference between the employers and employers, or between employers and workmen , or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with employment and non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person."

7. The definition of " industrial dispute" referred above, can be devided into four parts , viz ( 1 ) factum of dispute, (2) parties to the dispute , viz . (a) employers and employers , (b) employer and workmen, or (c) workmen and workmen, (3) subject matter of the dispute , which should beconnectedwith (i ) employment or non employment, or ( ii) terms ofemployment, or ( iii) condition of labour of any person, and (4) it should relate to an" industry" .

3. Management demurred the claim pleading that Mahender Singh was charge sheeted on 25-3-04, which chargeswereadmitted by him during the course of enquiry. He was represented by his defense representative in the enquiry, inwhose presence he admitted the charges . The Enquiry Officer submitted his findings , copy of which findingwas supplied to him and opportunity ofbeing heard was accordedto him by the Disciplinary Authority . He was personallyheard and thereafter punishment of compulsory retirement was awarded to him . It has been claimed that on previous occasions Mahender Singh was charge- sheeted andpunished for remaining absent unauthorisedly: Despite punishment being awarded to him, Mahender Singh did not mendhis ways . He was again charge- sheeted and he admitted the charge voluntarily, before the Enquiry Officer. Since Mahender Singh was a habitual absentee , 6564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] 8. The definition of industrial dispute is worded in very wide terms and unless they are narrowed by the meaninggiven to word "workmen " it would seem to include all " employers" , all " employments " and all "workmen", whatever the nature or scope of the employment maybe. Therefore, except in the cases where there can be a dispute between the employers and employers and workmen and workmen, one of the parties to an industrial dispute must be an employee or a class of employees . The first point, therefore, to be noticed, perhaps self evident, is that the "phrase"employer and workmen" , the plural may include singular on either side or any permutation of singular or plural, the masculine including the feminine . In order , therefore, to determine as to whether a controversy or difference or a dispute is an "an industrial dispute " or not, itmust firstbedetermined whether the workman concerned orworkmen sponsoring his cause satisfy the conditions ofclause (s) of Section 2 of theAct.

9. Clause ( s) of Section 2 of the Act defines the workman as follows:

include something more in what the term primarily denotes. By thispart of the definition, person ( i) who have been dismissed,discharged or retrenched in connection with an industrial dispute, or ( ii) whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has lead to an industrial dispute, for the purposes of any proceedings under the Act in relation to such industrial dispute , have been included in the definition of "workman ". This part gives extended connotation to the expression "workman" . The third part specifically excludes the categories of the persons specified in clauses (i) to ( iv) ofthis sub-section. The third part connotes that even if a person satisfies the requirements of any of the first twoparts but ifhe falls in any ofthe four categories in the third part, he shall be excluded from the definition of "workman" . Not only the persons who are actually employed in an industry but also those who have been discharged, dismissed or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of an industrial dispute, and whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has lead to that dispute, would fall within the ambit of the definition. In other words , the second category of persons included in thedefinition would fall in the ambit of the definition, only for the purpose of any proceedings under the Act , in relationto an industrial dispute and for no other purposes. Therefore, date of reference is relevant and in case a person falls within the definition of workman on that day , the Tribunal would be vested with jurisdiction to entertain it and the jurisdiction would not cease merely because subsequently the workman ceases to be workman.

(s) Workman means any person ( including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute , includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute , or whose dismissal , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, butdoes not include any such person-

(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the ArmyAct, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the NavyAct, 1957(62 of 1957), or

(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity , or

11. For an existing or apprehended industrial dispute itmust be between an employer and the workman. Clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 10 of the Act empowers the appropriate Government to refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to, the dispute whether it relates to any matter specified in the second schedule or third schedule to a Tribunal for adjudication . Sub- section ( 8 ) of the said section contemplates that no proceedings pending before a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal in relation to the industrial dispute shall lapse merely by reason of a death ofany of the parties to the dispute being a workman, and such Labour Court , Tribunal or National Tribunal shall complete such proceedings and submit its award to the appropriateGovernment .

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercises , either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him , functions mainly of a managerial nature .

12.The provisions of sub -section (8) of Section 10 ofthe Act gives effect to the proposition that the maxim "actio personalis moritur cum persona" has limited application . Theapplicability of that maxim depends upon the relief claimed and the facts of each case . In the event of the death of the workman, during the pendency of the proceedings , relief of reinstatement, obviously cannot be granted. InV. Bhaskaran [ 1982( 1) LLJ 485] Kerala High Court has taken a view that if after having raised the dispute , the workman dies , his legal representative can further agitate and prosecute the dispute before the industrial authorities 10.The first part ofthe definition gives the statutory meaning of the workman . This part of the definition determines aworkman by reference to a person (including anapprentice) employed in an " industry" to do any manual unskilled , skilled , technical , operational , clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward . This part determines what a"workman" means . The second part is designed to 6565 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

because, in law a legal representative is not a different personfrom thedeceased, but only continues the persona ofthe deceased. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Limited [1985(1 ) LLJ 36] the Apex Court ruled that when a workman dies during the pendency of the proceedings , his reinstatementbecomes impossible. However the court can grant the appropriate relief by ordering the employer to pay his wages till the date of his death. Therefore , it is evident that on the date of the death of workman proceedings before any adjudicating authority, in relation toan industrial dispute, shall not lapse merely by reason ofdeath ofanyofthe parties to the dispute being a workman and the adjudicator is enjoined with a duty to complete such proceedings and submit his award to the appropriate Government.

Employment, the Chief Labour Commissioner ( Central ), the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central ) and the Assistant LabourCommissioner (Central) . Rule 4 contemplates that the saidapplication shall be signed (a) in case ofemployer by the employer himself or when employer is an incorporated company or other body corporate by the agent, imanager or other principal officer of the Corporation; (b)in case ofworkmen, either by the President and Secretary ofatrade union of the workmen, or by five representatives oftheworkmen duly authorized in this behalfat a meeting oftheworkmenheld for that purpose, and (c) in the case of an individual workman, by the workman himself or by any officer of the trade union of which he is a member or by another workman in the same establishment duly authorized byhim in that behalf. In case ofan application being signed by a workman of the same establishment, authorized by the workman in that behalf, the workman should not be a- member ofa different trade union.

15. Claim statement has been filed by Smt. Shakuntla, thewidow ofthe deceased. As is evident Smt. Shakuntla is not a workman working in the same establishment, wherein herdeceasedhusband was working. Therefore , the claim statement has not been filed by a duly authorized person. No case isprojected by the widow ofthe deceased workman that Mahender Singh, during his life time, had filed an application before the Conciliation Officer . When applicationwas filed by a person, not authorized to do so, the appropriate Government was not competent to take notofit formaking a reference to this Tribunal under clause (d) of sub-section ( 1) of Section 10 of the Act . Consequently these facts reaffirm the findings that the appropriateGoverınent lacked jurisdiction to refer dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication, since the application was notmovedbefore the Conciliation Officer by a competent person, asdetailed in rule 4 of the Rules.

13. However, the proposition is different when the workmanexpires even prior to the date when the dispute was referred for adjudication. When a workman dies while the dispute is in the conciliation stage before the Conciliationofficer , the dispute will abate by reason ofhis death, since for raising a dispute it should be between an employer and a workman. On the death of a workman, dispute relatingto his dismissal , discharge or retrenchment canbe espoused by a union , since issues relating to his discharge, dismissal or retrenchment may affect the other workmenof the industry. In that situationwhen the dispute isespousedby a union, it canbe referred by the appropriate Government and not otherwise . Here in the case thedispute under reference was not espoused by any union. It was raised under Section 2A of the Act. On account ofdeath of Mahender Singh, provisions of Section 2A of the Act ceased tooperate in his favour. Therefore , without espousal ofthe dispute by the union, the appropriate Government was not competent to refer it to this Tribunal for adjudication, on account of death of the workman. Provisions ofsub-section (8 ) of Section 10 oftheAct would apply to the reference and other proceedings, which are pending on the date of death of the workman before a Labour Court, Tribunal or a National Tribunal and not before a Conciliation Officer. Consequently it is apparent that the appropriate Government lacked jurisdiction to refer thisdispute to this Tribunal for adjudication after the death ofMahender Singh, for want of espousal by aunion.

16. Now I would consider the facts . As detailed above, Smt. Shakuntala was not at all aware about the enquiry conducted by the management against her husband, She is oblivious of the facts that her husband was given opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. She could not spell even a single word about the enquiry as well as procedure adopted by the Enquiry Officer. Not even aword was spoken by the lady to the effect that her husbandwas not given an opportunity to defend himself bytheEnquiryOfficer. Therefore, it is evident that Smt . Shakuntla projects a vacuum on the issue as to whether herhusband had an opportunity to defend himselfbefore theEnquiryOfficer or not. She simply highlights that no notice was served upon her husband nor anything was paid to him at the time of termination of his service . According to her no pension was sanctioned in favour of her husband, who remained unemployed till the date ofhis death aftertermination ofher service .

14. There is other facet of the coin. The Rules provide procedure for reference of industrial dispute to Boards of Conciliation, Court of enquiry, Labour Court, Industrial Tribunals or National Tribunal. Rule 3 ofthe Rules makes it clearthat anapplication under sub - section (2) ofSection 10 of the Act, for reference of an industrial dispute to a Board, Court, Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, shallbe made in form A and be delivered personally or forwarded by registered post to the Secretary of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and 6566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) ] 17. To establish that the Enquiry Officerhas violated the principles of natural justice, the following factors are to be shown :

(1) The enquiry is defective on account of violations ofprinciples ofnatural justice.

19. Consequently on the merits too there is no justifiability for any interference with the punishment of voluntary retirement awarded to the deceased workman . Claim filedby Smt. Shakuntla is found to be devoid of merits ,besides being incompetent. An award is accordingly passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

(a) the employee was not informed of the charge against him.

(b) No, evidence was taken in support ofthe charges.

Dated: 18-9-09 Dr. R.K. YADAV, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

(d) The employee was not given a fair opportunityto cross examine the witnesses examinedby the management .

का. आ. 2952.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 114/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था। (e) The employee was not given a fair opportunity to examine witnesses including himself in his defence, if he so wishes , on any relevantmatter.

[सं. एल -22012/371 / 2004-आई . आर (सी.एम.- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 29th September, 2009 (f) The enquiry officer has not written a report, givinghis findings with reasons.

(g) The dismissal is founded on a ground which was not included in the charge sheet uponwhich the enquiry was held .

S.O. 2952.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 114/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court , Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kajora Area ofM/s . ECL, and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

(h) The dismissal is founded on the interrogation of the workmen, without examining any witnesses in support ofthe charges.

(ii) The enquiry was not held in accordance with the relevant standing order of the establishment.

[No. L- 22012/ 371 /2004- IR (CM -II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT ASANSOL

Present : Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer Reference No. 114 of 2005 PARTIES

The Agent, Lachipur Colliery , Kajora Area of M/s. ECL, Nutundanga, Burdwan. Versus

General Secretary , Koyla Mazdoor Congress , Gorai Mansion, G. T. Road, Asansol , Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES

: None

For the Management

Forthe Union (Workman) : None

Industry:Coal

State:West Bengal 18. Smt . Shakuntla nowhere speaks inher testimony thatdocumentswere not supplied to her deceased husband by the Enquiry Officer . It is not her case that the Enquiry Officerwronglyrecorded plea ofguilt ofher husband. When proceedings were perused, it came to light that Mahender Singh pleaded guilty to the charge before the Enquiry Officer, inpresent of S.K. Brar , his defense representative . WhenMahender Singh voluntarily admitted the charges before the Enquiry Officer, Enquiry Officer was justified in recording the findings against the workman. Therefore, his report dated 26-5-04 has not come under attack, being violativeof the principles of natural justice. The Disciplinary Authority gave an opportunity to the workman to offer an explanation against proposed punishment of voluntary retirement.Heheard the workman and considered his past record of service. He passed an order of compulsory retirement on the workman and his order is proportionate to the misconduct. The workman was a habitual absentee and opted not to mend his ways despite punishment being awarded to him thrice . Under these circumstances , punishment awarded to the workman is found to be proportionate to his misconduct .

[भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

6567

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

Dated the 27-7-2009

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , Govt. of India throughtheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L-22012/ 371/2004- IR (CM - II) dated 17-8-2005 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management ofLachipur Colliery under Kajora Area of ECL in denying employment tothe dependent ofLate Khadal Gouda No. 2Wagon Loader, who died while in service, is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the dependant ofdeceased workman is entitled ?"

Afterhaving received the Order No. L-22012/371 / 2004- IR(CM- II) dated 17-8-2005 ofthe above said reference fromtheGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 114 of 2005was registered on 9-9-2005 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear inthe Court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims. In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

New Delhi, the 29th September, 2009

S.O. 2953. In pursuanceince of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Limited , and their workmen, which was receivedby the Central Government on 25-9-2009 .

[No. L- 22012/110/2004- IR(CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

Present: Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer Reference No. 119 of 2005

PARTIES

TheAgent, Nutundanga Colliery, Pandabeswar Area ofM/s . ECL, Nutundanga, Burdwan Vs.

General Secretary , Koyla Mazdoor Congress , GoraiMansion, G. T. Road, Asansol, Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES :

: None

For the Management

None

FortheUnion (Workman) :

Industry: Coal

The workman nor his authorized representative nor the Unionraising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitledto no relief. Hence

ORDERED

Let an"Award" be and same is passed as per above. Sendthe copies ofthe order to Govt . ofIndia Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MANORANJAN PATINAIK, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

का. आ. 2953.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई . सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 119/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/110/2004- आई. आर. ( सी. एम.- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

State: WestBengal Dated the27-7-2009

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section (1 ) and Sub- section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , Govt. of India through theMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 110/2004- IR (CM - II) dated 29-8-2005 has been pleasedto refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Nutundanga Colliery under Pandabeswar Area of M/s.ECL in denying employment to the dependant of Late Helena Bouri, Wagon Loader is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

After having received the Order No. L- 22012/ 110/ 2004- IR(CM- II) dated 29-8-2005 ofthe above said reference from theGovt. of India, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi for 6568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No. 119 of 2005was registered on 9-9-2005 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing them to appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] Reference No. 100 of2005

PARTIES

TheGeneralManager , Sripur Area ofM/s . ECL, Sripur Bazar, Burdwan .

Versus

The General Secretary, West Bengal Coal Mines Shramik Sabha (HMS ) , Asansol .

REPRESENTATIVES

: None

For the management

: None

For the union (Workman)

State: West Bengal

Industry: Coal

Theworkman nor his authorized representative nor theUnionraising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement ofclaim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no relief.Hence

ORDERED

Let an " Award" be and same is passed as per above . Sendthe copies of the order to Govt . of India Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needfu.. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2954.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं. एल-22012/478/2004-आई आर (सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi, the 29th September, 2009 S.O. 2954. In pursuancesuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the IndustrialDispute between the management ofM/ s . Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workmen, which was received bythe Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L-22012/478/2004- IR(CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

AN EXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT ,

ASANSOL

PRESENT

Sri ManoranjanPattnaik , Presiding Officer Dated the24-7-2009 AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section (1 ) and Sub-section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) , Govt . of India through theMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L-22012/ 478/2004- IR (CM - II) dated 1-9-2005 has been pleased to referthe following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Sripur Area of ECL stand in not providing Sri Balbinder Singh , Md. Muslim , Md. Ali Hussain, Sk. Ainul , Sk . Mohiuddin to Grade- I from Grade B is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ? "

Afterhaving received the Order No. L-22012/478/ 2004- IR (CM- II) dated 1-9-2005 ofthe above said reference from theGovt. of India, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 100 of 2005was registered on 9-9-2005 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered postto the parties concerned directing themto appear inthe court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance ofthe said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

The workman nor his authorized representative nor theUnion raising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal. As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no relief. Hence

ORDERED

Let an "Award" be and same is passed as per above . Send the copies of the order to Govt . of India , Ministry of 6569 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

Labour, New Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer

throughtheMinistry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 17/2005 - IR(CM- II) dated 2-11-2005 has been pleasedto refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal:

नईदिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

SCHEDULE

"Whether theaction of the management ofParascole Colliery under Kajora Area of ECL in not making payment ofdifferential amounts ofwages in Clerical grade to Sh . R. K. Bind is legal andjustified ? Ifnot, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to ?"

का. आ. 2955.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई. सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट (संदर्भ संख्या 126/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल-22012/17/2005- आई. आर. ( सी. एम.- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , the 29th September , 2009

Afterhaving received the Order No. L- 22012/ 17/2005- IR(CM- II) dated 2-11-2005 of the above said reference from theGovt. of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute; a reference case No. 126 of 2005was registered on 5-12-2005 and accordingly anorder to that effect was passed to issue notices through the registeredpostto the parties concerned directing themto appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance ofthe said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

S.O. 2955. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Governmenthereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 126/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management ofM/ s . Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workmen, which was received bythe Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L-22012/17/2005- IR (CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Theworkman nor his authorized representative nor the Union raising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all. The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reasonto find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitledto no relief. Hence

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

ORDERED

Present: Sri Manoranjan Pattnaik, Presiding Officer

Reference No. 126 of2005

PARTIES

Let an"Award" be and same is passed as per above . Sendthecopies of the order to Govt. of India Ministry of Labour, New Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

TheAgent, Parascole Colliery, of M/s . ECL, Burdwan.

MANORANJAN PATINAIK, Presiding Officer Vs.

नईदिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

General Secretary, KoylaMazdoor Congress , Gorai Mansion, G. T. Road , Asansol , Burdwan

REPRESENTATIVES

: None

For the Management

: None

For the Union (Workman)

का. आ. 2956. औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण , आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 99/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

Industry: Coal

State: West Bengal

Dated the 28-7-2009

[सं. एल-22012/469/2004- आई आर ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्कअधिकारी AWARD

NewDelhi , the 29th September , 2009

S.O. 2956. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central In exercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of Sub- section ( 1 ) and Sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India

3689 G1/09-26 6570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

[PART II-SEC .3(i) ]

ofthe said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 99/2005) of the Central Government. Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Mia., Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L-22012/469/2004- IR(CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

Theworkman nor his authorized representative nor theUnion raising this Industrial Dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no relief. Hence

ANNEXURE

ORDERED

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL

PRESENT

Let an "Award" be and same is passed as per above. Send the copies of the order to the Government of India; Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi for information andneedful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

Sri Manoranjan Rattnaik, Presiding Officer ReferenceNo. 99 of2005

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, PresidingOfficer नईदिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर , 2009

PARTIES

The Agent, Shyamsundarpur Colliery, Bankola Area of M/ s, ECL , Ukhra, Burdwan .

General Secretary, Ukhra Colliery Mazdoor Union, Cinema Road, Ukhra, Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES

का.आ. 2957.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं भारतीय खाद्य निगम के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 163/2002 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था । : None

For the management

: None

For the union (Workman)

[सं. एल-22012/197/2001- आई आर (सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी.

Industry: Coal

: State: West Bengal

NewDelhi , the 29th September, 2009 Dated, the28-7-2009

AWARD

S.O. 2957.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 163/2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of FoodCorporation of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25-9-2009.

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (14 of1947) , Government of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letterNo. L-22012/469/2004- IR (CM- II) dated 31-8-2005 has been pleased to refer the following dispate for adjudication by thisTribunal:

SCHEDULE

[No. L- 22012/ 197/2001 -IR (CM- II) ] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT

"Whether the action of the management of ShyamsundarpurCollieryunder BankołaArea ofECL in denying employment to the dependent of Late Rambhagot Bhula, S /Teammer is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the dependant of deceasedworkman is entitled?"

N. K. Purohit, Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 163/2002

Ref. No. L- 22012/ 197/ 2001 - IR (CM- II) dt. 2-9-2002 BETWEEN

The State Secretary,

Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karmchari Sangh, 5-6,Habibullah Estate , Hazratganj , Locknow

(Espousing case ofSh. Shyam Veer Singh)

After having received the Order No. L- 22012/469/ 2005- IR(CM- II) dated31-8-2005 of the above said reference from theGoverument of India, Ministry of Labour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, a reference case No.99 of2005 was registered on 9-9-2005 and accordingly an order to that offect was pessad to issue notices through the registesod post to the porties consomad directing them to appear in the count on the date fined and to file their written statements alongwith the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in suppent of their claims . In pursuance भारत का राजपत्र :

[भाग II-खंड3(ii) ]

24, 2009/ कर्षक 2, 1931

issue gate passosby the workman which he died as per the onders of the depotischarge and AM (DD), it does not amount to misconduct.

TheSr.Regional Manager, Food Corporation ofIndia, 5-6Habibullah Estate , Hazratganj , Lucknow

Dated, the16-9-2009

AWARD

TheGovernment of India , Ministry ofLabour,New Delhi referred thefollowingdispute No. L- 22012/197/2001- IR(CM- II) dated2-9-2002 to the Presiding Officer , CGIT- cum-LabourCourt, Lucknow for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Food CorporationofIndia, Lucknow in imposing penalty videorder dated5/ 13-3-99 and passing appellate order dt.24/26-5-2000 were legal and justified ? Ifnot,what reliefthe workman is entitled to "

2. Subsequently, the order of schedule in the above reference order was substituted by following schedule vide corrigendumdt. 21-1-2004 issued by the Ministry ofLabour, Govt. ofIndia, NewDelhi .

4.Theunion has alleged that Sr. Regional Manager, FCI accepted the enquiry report without applicationofmind and imposed penalty of compulsory retirement on the workman vide impugned order dt. 2-3-1994. Against the saidorder, theworkman filed an appeal before Appellate Authoritywho found that the incharge Sh. S. C. Sharma andAM(D) were responsible for alleged irregularity. The appellate authority found the workman had issued gate passes on the order ofthe depot incharge and AM (D) but ithas beenwrongly and illegally held that workman had issued gate passes under the signature as depot incharge, Bilsiand for this irregularity he held workman guilty vide order dt. 24/26-5-2000 and modified the penalty of compulsory retirent by imposing punishment ofreduction tothe minimum scale ofpay ofthe workman for the period of5years. It is alleged by the union that alleged order of appellate authority is also totally illegal, arbitry and erroneous. The trade union therefore, requested that the onder ofdisciplinary authoritydt. 2-3-94 and the Appellate Authority order dk. 24/26-5-2000 be set aside.

"Whether the action of the FCI in imposing penalty upon late Shri Shyam Veer Singh vide order dated 2-3-1994 and passing appellate order dated 24/26-5-2000were legal andjustified ? Ifnot, towhat relief the dependent of late Shri Shyam Veer Singh workman are entitled ?"

5. In rebuttal, the FCI has denied the allegations& submitted that charges levoled against the workmanwhe justifiedandthey were supported by the evidence and the enquiry report dt. 19-4-93 was based on material on record. It further submitted that the wordman was duty bound for performing the security duty. The disciplinary authority accepted the enquiry report only after considering themerit ofthe case and evidence on record and the penalty was imposed by him in accordance with law. Subsequently, appellate authority after under going mertt of the case modified the penalty order of compulsory rettamusest to reduction to the minimum of scale of the workman for a period of5 years . The signing of gate pesses on behalf of the depot incharge do not abeolve him from the mi ofmisappropriation of the stock in connivance with Sh. S. C. Sharma, Depot hacharge. It has been plonded in additional picas that legal heirs ofSh. Shyam Veer Singh are not members of the trade union sor they are astually claimants, thus , the claim is not maintainable as it is filed bythe State Secretary of the trade union.

6. The tradeunion has filled rejoinder from reiterating earlier averments made in the statement of claim, it has further stated that proceedings will not lapse duetodeath of the workman.

7. Following issues have been framedon24-7-2003:

(1) Whether Sh. S. P. Singh has no authority to file present statement of claim ifso, itseffect.

3. In brief, the case of the union is that Sh. Shyam Veer Singh was watchman at Bilsi Depot of Food Corporation of India. He was served with charge sheet No. V&S/4(357)/RO.LKO/86/53 dt. 5/ 13-3-1969. The said charge-sheet was given for irregularities in stook forwhich watchman cannot be held responsible . It is alleged that during domestic enquiry a list of 11 defence documents was submitted out ofwhich document 7,9 and 11 were not provided for inspection and even decuments were not brought in the enquiry for its production. Enquiry Officer considered those documents as relevant. Hence the case ofworkanan hasbeen prejudiced and the principle ofnatural justice has been violated. It is fusthes submitted that charge isvague anddoes not reveal how and when the werkman made shortage of 463 wheat bags. It is alleged that the enquiry officer has failed to consider evidence and version ofthe workmanthat the workınan was class IV employee and completion of record of the godown was the responsibility and duty ofclass III employee posted in the depot. The allegations were totally against the job description for watchman in FCI . Sti S. C. Sharma was the AG- III (D) andwas made incharge ofFSD, Bilsi under direct supervision ofSh. V. S. Suman , AM(D). There was no class III employee posted in the depot . The workman was the onlywatchmanwith depot incharge Sh. S. C. Sharma, AG- III(D). The godown were scattered and situated within a distance of2 kms . there was administrative requiremontto

(2) Whether the charges loveled against Sh. Shyam Veer Singhwere vague, whether the dovuments were not supplied for inspection andwerenot 6572

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931 ,

prayedinthe enquiry, whether the enquiry officer has failed to consider evidence of the workman and whether the enquiry proceeding were conducted in violation of natural justice if so , itaeffect.

(3) Whether the findings of the enquiry officer is perversed and without any basis.

(4) Whether the punishment order and appellate order is arbitratory illegal and bad in the eyes of law.

(5) To what rehef if any, the workman is entitled.

8. Subsequently following two preliminary issues were framed on 2-9-2004:

(1) Whether departmental enquiry was conducted without observing the principle of natural justice.

(2) Whether the findings of the enquiry officer is perversed.

9. The issue nos . 2 & 3 framed on 27-7-03 are also pertaining to violation of principle of natural justice and perversity respectively but subsequently vide order dt . 2-9-2004 parties were directed to lead evidence on the aforementioned issues only.

10. The management has examined Sh . A. K. Bhatnagar as management witness whereas the union has not examined any witness in support of its case .

11.Heard learned representative of both the sides . Instead of restricting their submissions on preliminary issues , they have made submission in respect of all the issues . Perused the relevant material on record.

12. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that the claim of the union on behalfofthe workman is not maintainable as the same has been filedby Sh. S. P. Singh, State Secretary, FCI Karamchari Sangh and the secretary has riot produced any authority from the legal hairs of the deceased workman whereas the learned representative on behalf of the union has contended that he was trade union secretary who has espousedhis claim before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Central) Kanpur and the case does not abate after death ofthe workman during the pendency of the reference .

13.Admittedly, Sh. Shyam Veer Singh has expired on 11-10-2000 during the proceedings of this reference. Sub- Section 8 of the Section 10 envisages that no proceedings pending before the Tribunal in relation to any industrial dispute shall lapse merely by reason by the death of the workmanand the Tribunal shall complete such proceedings and submit its award to the appropriate government therefore, consequence of the death of the worker , the proceedings shall not abate . In the circumstances if the 付

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] legalhairs of Sh. Shyam Veer Singh have not authorised Sh. S. P. Singh , State Secretary, the case shall proceed . It is the duty of the Tribunal to adjudicate the reference which ismade over to it, therefore, the contention of the learned representative on behalf of the management in this regard isnot tenable .

14. The learned representative on behalf of the workman has contended that a list was submitted by the workman for providing 11 defence documents out ofwhich document at Sl . Nos . 7, 9 & 10 were not made available to the workman which has caused prejudice and violated the principle of natural justice whereas the learned representative on behalf of the management has submitted that no such objection was raised by the workman during departmental enquiry.

15.Inthis regard defence briefC-51 submittedby the workman is an admitted document, wherein it is stated that in defence 11 documents were demanded but documents at Sl . Nos . 7 , 9 & 10 were not made available to him by the concerned authority which are pertaining to office order, transit shortage for the period and TA bills repectively.

16. How the above documenta were relevant and caused prejudice to the workman, has not been shown . There is no oral evidence in this regard. The management witnesshas not been cross-examined on this point . There is neither pleadings nor any evidence that any objection was raised for not providing the documents demanded by the workman . In view of the above, the contention of the learned representative on behalf of the union that principle ofnatural justice have been violated is not sustainable .

17. The learned representative on behalf ofthe union has contended that workman has been punished for the alleged act of issuing gate passes under his signature as depot incharge, Bilsi but there was no such allegation in the charge leveled against the workman. The workman can not be penalize for the charge which has not been framed. The delay in issue of charge - sheet in the present matter and continuance for several years has prejudiced the cause of the workman. He has further contended that the alleged act should not only be wilful but it must also causedamage to work in progress or to any other property but there is no such finding. In support of his contentions, hehas placed reliance on the following case laws:

(1 ) 2006 ( SCC) (L& S) 910L. B. Bizlani Vs.Union of India

(2) 2005(23 ) LCD 1101 Ayodhya Singh Vs. Oriental Bank ofCommerce .

(3) 1995 FLR (70 ) 813 Meena Singh Vs. Member Judge, Industrial Court, Jabalpur bench.

18. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf of the FCI has urged that charge leveled against the workman is not vague . Moreover , no such plea was taken 6573 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

in his reply to the charge . It is also urged that gate passes have been issued by the workman as an incharge forwhich hewas not authorised. The impugned order is justified.He hasplaced reliance on the following case laws:

modified under Regulation 72 of the StaffRegulation 1971 tothe extend ofreduction to the minimum scale ofpay of workman for aperiod of5 years . In the order of appeal dt . 24/26-5-2000, the Appellate Authority has observed as under:

(1) (2006) 7 SCC 588 Om PrakashManb Vs.Director ofEducation& others.

(2) (2006) 4 SCC 713 Narender Mohan Arya Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

19. I havegiven my thoughtful consideration on the rival submissions ofboth the charges .

20. Admittedly, the workman was served memo (12/2) alongwith statement ofArticle ofcharges ( 12/3) and statement of imputation ofmisconduct ( 12/4) in support of article ofcharges framed. The workman was charge sheeted for the following alleged misconduct:

" Sh. Shyam Veer Singh , WM while posted and functioning at FSD , Bilsi during 1985-86 failed to maintain absolute integrity devotion to duty in as much as he has committed irregularities on account ofwhich corporation has suffered loss of 463 bags 1824-69-300 qtls . of wheat which were detectedby the committee appointed by the District Manager,Moradabad vide their report dt . 3-2-86 .

"Itis undisputed that gate passes were issued by theappellant. The appellant being Cat. IV employee was not supposed to issue gate passes . This fact was known to the depot incharge and AM (D) . 1 have seen that wheat stock issued from FSD Bilsi withoutweighment and receipt weight recordedby the destination was taken as dispatch weight by the depot incharge , Bilsi . The stock was transportedto Chandausi without escort. It was the responsibility ofthe Depot Incharge and AM (D) to ensure that stock was dispatched after proper weighment and escort. I have also seen Exb. P.1 through which Distt. Manager, Moradabad reported that the committee members found that depot records was not maintainedby the Depot Incharge since May, 1984. I am ofthe considered opinion that depot incharge is solely responsible for these irregularities and not the appellant. The wheat stock despatched at the mercy ofT.C. that too without conducting weighment proves extended undue favour by the depot incharge/ AM (D) Bilsi with an intention to avoid transit loss andbenefit both the contractor and themselves. I also seen Exb . P. 19 in which details of gate passes issued under the signature of appellant . He issued gate passes under his signature as depot incharge Bilsi. For this irregularity I hold the appellant guilty. " Forthe said losses of wheat stocks found short at FSD, Bilsi . Said Sh. Shyam Veer Singh, WM in connivance with Sh . S. C. Sharma, AG- III (D) the thenDepot Incharge, Bilsi is responsible. He thereby contravened regulation 31 & 32 of FCI Staff Regulation, 1971. "

21. The enquiry officer found above charge as proved. In concluding para of his report he has observed asunder:

23. The management witness Sh . A. K. Bhatnagar has stated that workman was watchman at the relevant time and he unauthorisedly issued gate passes . He has stated inhis cross -examination that in above copies of gate passes it is no where mentioned that the same can be signed only by the Depot Incharge . He has further stated that gate passes are to be signed by the person issuing them. Hehas also stated that as per job description ofthe Staff ofFCI (30/20) watchman has to work as per directions ofthe seniors. He has also stated that since only two personswereworking in depot therefore at one point, the workmanSh . Shyam Veer Singh was deployed.

"In view of the fact it is clear that the work which was not in his purview of duty committed by him gladly clearly shows that he had some financial gain in doing this job at the most he may prepare the gate passes and request to his Depot Incharge to sign them.But in the instate case the C.C. Sh . Shyam Veer Singhhad signed them as Depot Incharge, Bilsi on theaforesaiddates, already mentioned in gate passes with mala fide intention . As such he is equally responsible inthe misappropriation ofwheat stocks and other articles of FCI mentioned in Ex. P- 1 and P-2 ."

24.As perjob description of the FCI for watchman's beside otherjob , one of the task mentioned is to perform other related work that may be assigned to him by his superior. As regards issuance of gate passes , the AppellateAuthority has observed in the impugned order asunder:

"It is undisputed that gate passes were issued by the appellant. The Appellant being Category IV employee was not supposed to issue gate passes. This fact was known to the Depot . Incharge & AM (D), Bilsi . It appears that appellant had issued 22. It isalso not disputed that vide memo dt. 24-4-93 , theenquiry report was served upon the workman and after considering his reply the Disciplinary Authority vide its orderdt. 2-3-94 ( 12/11 ) under Regulation 56 of FCI Staff Regulation 1971 imposed penalty of compulsory retirement from servicebut subsequently in appeal , filed against the said order, the penalty of compulsory retirement was 6574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SBC .3 (ii) ] gate passes on the direction of Depot Incharge/ AM(D) ."

25.Thus it is evident from the impugned order passed by the appellate authority that he was not agreed with the findings of the disciplinary authority on following basic ingredients ofthe charge levelled against the workman :

(A) That the workman failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to his duty.

(B) That workman was responsible for losses of wheat stock found short.

(c) abide by the provision of the Act and the Rules (d) complywith & obey all lawful orders and directions issued to him in the course of official duties by superiors . Regulation 32 is pertaining to misconduct and enumerates as many as 38 acts of omission and commission, which shallbe treated as misconduct. The alleged irregularity for which the Appellate Authority has found the workman guilty is merely issuing gate passes which according to finding ofthe Appellate Authority seems to be issued as perdirections ofthe superiors , does not attract neither any clause under Regulation 31 nor any clause of commissions or omissions enumerated under Regulation 32 of the Regulation Act, 1971. Further, the workman has been punished for the charge which was not categorically mentioned in the charge-sheet .

30. In view of the above discussions the action of FCI management in imposing penalty on Sh . Shyam Veer Singh vide orderdt. 2-3-94 and passing appellate order dt. 24/26-5-2000 are not legal and justified and the same are liable to be set aside .

26. Since the appellate authority has not agreed with the findings ofthe enquiry officer &disciplinary authority on the above ingredients constituting the charge, the impugned order passed by the disciplinary authority can not be said to be justified. Moreover , the order of the disciplinary authority dt. 2-3-94 stood merged with order dt. 24-5-2000 passedby the appellate authority wherein theonly irregularity said to be proved is regarding issuance of gate passes by the workman under his signature.

31.Accordingly, the reference under adjudication is decided in favour of the union . Since the action ofthe FCI in imposing penalty upon the workman vide order dt. 2-3-94 and passing appellate order dt. 24/26-5-2000 is not justified, therefore , the said impugned orders are set aside. Resultantly, the dependents of the late Sh . Shyam Veer Singh workman are entitled for consequential relief as a result of setting aside of the said orders.

32. The reference under, adjudication is answered- accordingly.

N. K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer The appellate authority has observed in its order that workman had issued gate passes under his signature asDepot Incharge as per directions ofhis superior. Further despitedisagreeing with the findings of the enquiry officer onthematerial point he has held the workman guilty and has imposed punished for the said irregularity. Evidently, the conclusiondrawn by the appellate authority does not commensurate with the findings of holding the workman guiltyfor alleged charge levelled against the workman .

Lucknow 16-9-2009

नईदिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

का. आ. 2958.- औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी. एल .के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 75/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं . एल-22012/236/2004- आई . आर. ( सीएम-11 ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़ , डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009

28. It is alleged in charge levelled against the workman thathe had contravened the Regulation 31 & 32 of the Regulation 1971 and he did not maintain absolute integrity and devotion to his duty as the workman has committed irregularities on account of which the Corporation has suffered loss but as per the findings of the Appellate Authority, the Depot Incharge was solely responsible for thealleged misconduct, not the workman. He has not given any findings against the workman for alleged connivance with the Depot Incharge concerned in the misappropriation ofwheat bags nor there is any findings that gate passes havebeen issuedby the workman malafidely or the act of issuing gate passes has resulted in loss to the Corporation. Further, there is no such findings that the workman did not maintain absolute integrity or devotion to duty as a result of irregularity of issuing gate passes.

29. It is notclear from the charge- sheet itselfunder which clause enumerated in Regulation 31 & 32 of the Regulations 1971 , the workman has been dealt with. Regulation 31 envisages that employee shall at all times ( a) maintain absolute integrity (b) maintain devotion to duty

S.O. 2958.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. 75/ 2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal- cum- Labour Court, Asansol as shown in the Annexure , in the industrialdispute between the management of Madhujore 6575 भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खंड 3( ) ]

Colliery, Kajors Aste ofhis ECT, andtheir workunan, which was received bythe Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L-22012/236/2004- IR(CM- II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

Theworkman nor his authorized represcatative nor theUnion raising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all . The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal. As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no relief. Hence

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT , ASANSOL

PRESENT

Sri Manoranjan Pattwaik, PresidingOfficer

Reference No. 75of2005

PARTIES

Let an"Award" be and same is passed as per above. Send the copies of the order to the Govt. ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi for information and needful. The reference is accordingly disposed of.

TheAgent,Madhujore Colliery, Kajora Area ofM/s . ECL, Dakshinkanda, Burdwan.

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, PresidingOfficer नई दिल्ली, 29 सितम्बर, 2009

Vs.

General Secretary , KoylaMazdoor Congress,Gorai Mansion, G.T. Road, Asansol, Burdwan.

REPRESENTATIVES

: None

For the management

For theunion(Workman) : None

कर. आ. 2959.-औधोगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार एवं ई.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण, आसनसोल के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 8/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जोकेन्द्रीय सरकार को 25-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

State:WestBengal

Industry: Coal

Dated the 20-10-2009

[सं. एल-22012/31/2004-आई. आर. ( सीएम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी AWARD

New Delhi , the 29th September , 2009 In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section(1 ) and Sub - section2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), Govt. of India through the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 22012/236/2004- IR (CM -II)dated29-06-2005 has been pleasedto refer the following dispute for adjudicationby thisTribunal:

SCHEDULE

S.O. 2959. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum -Labour Court, Asansol now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Kunustoria Arca, M/ s . Eastern Coalfields Limited and their workman , which was received bythe Central Government on 25-9-2009.

[No. L-22012/31/2004- IR (CM-II)] AJAY KUMAR GAUR, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

"Whether the action of the management of Madhujore Colliery under Kajora Area of ECL in denying employment to dependant son ofLateBansi Buhiya, U.G. Loader and payment of monetary compensationto wife of deceased workman for the period from date ofdeath ofworkman to the date of employment of dependant son in accordance with NCWA VI is legal and justified? Ifnot, towhat relief the family ofthe deceased workman is entitled?"

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, ASANSOL PRESENT

Sri ManoranjanPattnaik, Presiding Officer ReferenceNo. 8of2005

PARTIES

TheAgent, Parasea Colliery of M/ s . ECL , Parasea , Burdwan.

Vs.

Sri Rakesh Kumar, General Secretary, KoylaMazdoor Congress , Gorai Mansion, G. T. Road, Asansol.

Afterhaving received the Order No. L-22012/236/ 2004- IR(CM-II)1)dateddated29-06-200529-06-2 ofthe above said reference from theGovt. ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour, New Delhi for adjudication ofthe dispute , a reference case No. 75 of2005 was registered on 17-08-2005 and accordingly an orderto that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing themto appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

6576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2 , 1931

REPRESENTATIVES

: None

For the management

For the union (Workman) : None

Industry: Coal

State: West Bengal Dated the 29-07-2009

AWARD

Inexercise ofpowers conferred by clause (d) ofSub- section( 1 ) and Sub- section2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1974 ( 14 of 1947), Govt . of India through the Ministry ofLabour vide its letter No. L- 22012/ 31/2004- IR (CM - II ) dated 15-12-2004 has been pleased to refer the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal :

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of ECL in dismission Shri Raju Bouri , UG Loader from service vide order No. A. KNT/P & IR26/ ( C)/ 11525 dated 17-2-1994 is legal andjustified? Ifnot, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

Afterhaving received the Order No. L-22012/31/2004- IR(CM - II) dated 15-12-2004 of the above said reference from theGovt. ofIndia, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute , a reference case No. 8 of2005 was registered on 12-01-2005 and accordingly an orderto that effect was passed to issue notices through the registered post to the parties concerned directing themto appear in the court on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents and a list of witnesses in support of their claims . In pursuance of the said order notices by the registered post were sent to the parties concerned.

The workman nor his authorized representative nor the Union raising this Industrial dispute ever filed statement of claim and did not make their appearance at all. The management too did not take any steps apparently finding the workman's no interest for redressal . As such there is reason to find that no dispute exists and the workman is entitled to no reljef. Hence

ODERED

Let an " Award" be and same is passed as per above . Send the copies of the order to the Govt . of India, Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi for information and needful . The reference is accordingly disposed of.

MANORANJAN PATTNAIK, Presiding Officer

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] नई दिल्ली, 30 सितम्बर , 2009.

का. आ. 2960.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947(1947 का14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार, इंडियन टेलिफोन इन्डस्ट्रीज लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्र के सम्बद्ध में नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 100/2002 ) जो उक्त अधिकरण द्वारा दिनांक 18-09-2009के आदेश द्वारा संशोधित किया गया है , जैसा कि अनुबंध में दर्शाया गया है, को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29-9-2009 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं. एल -42012/136/2001- आई आर ( सी एम- II ) ] अजय कुमार गौड़, डेस्क अधिकारी NewDelhi , the 30th September, 2009

S.O. 2960. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 100/ 2002) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum- Labour Court, Lucknow which has been modified by the said Tribunal by Order dated 18-9-2009 as shown in the Annexure, inthe Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 29-9-2009 .

[No. L-42012/136/2001 - IR(CM - II)] AJAY KUMAR GUAR, Desk Officer ANNEXURE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT

N. K. Purohit, Presiding Officer . I.D. No. 100/2002

RefNo. L-42012/ 136/2001 - IR (CM- II) dated 28-5-2002 BETWEEN

Sh. Lakshmi Prasad Trivedi Acharya Nagar , Dr. J. Р. Singh Road, Near Alok Vidyalaya, Town and Post Lalganj Raebareilly.

AND

( The Executive Director, Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. , Doorbhas Nagar, Raebareilly.

AWARD Dated the 29-05-2009

By order No. L- 42012/ 136/2001 - IR ( CM - II) dated 28-5-2002 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, NewDelhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub-section ( 1) and Sub- section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this 6577 [भाग II-खंड 3( ii). ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

industrial dispute between Shri Lakshmi Prasad Trivedi , AcharyaNagar, Dr. J. P. Singh Road, Near Alok Vidayala, Town and Post Lalganj , Raebareilly and the Executive Director, Indian Telephone Industries Limited, Doorbhas Nagar,Raebareillyfor adjudication.

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Telephone Ltd. Raebareilly in removing Shri Lakshmi PrasadTrivedi from services w.e. f. 23-4-1982 is legal andjustified ? If not, to what reliefthe workman is entitled to ?"

2.Background facts in nutshell are follows:

4. The case of the workman is that he was on sanctioned study leave without pay and was out of station during enquiry. He had requested for postponing the enquirytill he resume duty but the request was not granted and instead an ex-parte enquiry was surreptitiously and hurriedly completed within a week without informing the workman that the enquiry wouldbe conducted ex -parte. If themanagement was really convinced about the gravity of the charges leveled against the workman and were very earnest and wanted to complete the enquiry within a specified period, they could have cancelled workman's leaveand recalled him to duty to launch formal disciplinary proceedings against him . Though that would have appearedabitharsh but no one could have doubted in the fairness of such an action because that would have provided the workman an opportunity to associate himself with the conduct of enquiry and in the process be convinced of its fairness . The workman has also alleged that he was selected for appointment against the post of category 'D' Clerk but was unjustly made to join on the lowerpost of category ' C' Clerk and when he protested against this injustice , the employer launch disciplinary proceeding in retaliation.

Theworkman Shri L. P. Trivedi was employed as categoryDClerk in the Indian Telephone Industries Limited, Raebareilly and charge sheet dated 6-7-1981 for alleged misconduct mentioned therein, was served upon him. The workmanreplied the said charge sheet vide his reply dated 7-7-1981 . The management of Indian Telephone Industries Limited, Raibereilly not satisfied with the explanation, initiated departmental enquiry against the workman by appointingDy .Manager Shri Sunil Kumar as Enquiry Officer. The enquiry officer vide his letter dated 18-8-1981 fixed 30-8-1981 for enquiry and informed the workman that he may engage his representative to defend the case . The worker vide his letter 26-8-1981. sought adjournment. The worker vide his letter dated 25-10-1981 requested for postponing the enquiry proceedings till 31-12-1981 as he is on leave without pay. The enquiry officer fixed another date for departmental enquiry as 1-11-1981 . In the circumstances ex -parte proceedings took place and the enquiry officer after considering the entire material submitted his report dated 18-12-1981 . Subsequently, the workmanwas removed from services vide impugned order dated23-4-1992.

5. The management has submitted that enquiry conducted was perfect, fair and proper and the workman attended the enquiry on 25-10-1981 and sought adjournment beyond 31-12-1981 on various grounds . The enquiryofficerdenied his request after due consideration and fixed the next date 1-11-1981 but the workman did not attend the enquiry on the said date and did not send any communicationto the enquiry officer seeking adjournment for said date and did not send any communication to the enquiry officer seeking adjournment for his non appearance. Under the above circumstances enquiry was conductedex-parte and there is no violation of principle of naturaljustice.Before deciding the case on merit, the then learnedPresiding Officer on 11-10-2002 framed following two issues;

1. क्या श्रमिक के विरुद्ध विभागीय जाँच त्रुटिपूर्ण है अथवा नहीं ?

2. क्याजाँच अधिकारी की आख्या दुराग्रहपूर्ण ( परवर्स ) है ?

6. Both the sides filed documentary evidence and the worker examined himself whereas the management examined Shri V. K. Singh in support of their respective case.After hearing both the parties, while deciding the preliminary issue No. 1 in favour of the workman, following orderwas passedby the Tribunal on 26-7-2006 :

"Thedepartmental enquiry vitiates as the same is in violation of the principles of natural justice . Management is directed to file the documentary evidence and list of witnesses on 13-9-2006 as stated in the body of the order. There is no question of proceedings on issue No. 2 as the enquiry has vitiated."

3.Afterhis removal from services, the workman filed aconciliation case before Conciliation Officer, Lucknow under UP I.D. Act, 1947 there upon the workman's case referred by the U.P. Government to the IT( II) Lucknow. It heldthat thedomestic enquiry conducted by the employer was notjust and fair. Subsequently, the management filed awritpetitionNo.4061/84 in Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, on 14-8-1984 against the above order which was dismissed fornon-prosecution. At the stage ofmanagement evidence, before L.T. ( II) in I.D. case No. 94/83, an application challenging the jurisdiction of the I.T. ( II) by the management stating therein that the reference of U.P. Government isbad in law and I.T. (II) has nojurisdictionto proceed further in the matter as the State of U.P. was not appropriate government as far as Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. , Raebareilly is concerned and Ultimately the said objection was accepted by the I.T. (II) , Lucknow. Subsequentto this, the industrial dispute was raised before the concerned competent authority. Failure of the conciliationproceeding necessitated the appropriate government to refer the matter for adjudication before this Tribunal.

3689 G1/09-27 6578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/ KARTIKA 2 , 1931

7. In pursuant to said order management submitted a list of witnesses C-37 and list of documents C- 38 and examined Smt . Sashi Bala Singh on 3-5-2007 in order to prove charges leveled against the workman for alleged misconduct mentioned in the charge sheet. In rebuttal , the workman.has examined himselfon 9-8-2007 .

8. Heard the learned representatives of both the sides and scanned the relevant material on record .

9. It is pertinent to mention that the proviso of Section 11A envisagès that in any proceedings under this section, theTribunal shall rely on the material on record and shall not take any fresh evidence . But in the matter of Neeta Kaplish Vs. Presiding Officer , Labour Court and another while considering the question of material evidence under Section 11A of the I.D. Act, Hon'ble Apex Court has held:

"In all cases where enquiry has not been held orthe enquiryhas been found to be defective Labour Court/Tribunal can call upon the management or the employertojustify action taken against the workman and to show by fresh evidence that the termination or dismissal order was proper . Ifmanagement does notleadanyevidenceby availing of this opportunity, it cannot raise any grouse any subsequent stage that it should have been given that opportunity , as the Tribunal , in those circumstances , would be justified in passing an award in favour of the workman. Ifhowever , opportunity is availed of and evidence is adduced by the management, validity of action taken by it has to be scrutinized and adjudicated on the basis of such fresh evidence ." "It is a fallacious argument that it was opento management to rely upon domestic enquiry proceedings, including the evidence recordedby the Enquiry Officer, and that management was under no obligation to lead further evidence, particularly as the management was of the view that the charges against appellant stood proved on the basis of evidence leadbefore the Enquiry Officer. It is also not correct to say enquiry proceedings constituted "material on record" under Section 11 -A and they couldnotbe ignored."

"Records pertaining domestic enquiry would not constitute"fresh evidence" as those proceedings have already been found by the Labour Court to be defective. Such record would also not constitute "material on record" within the meaning of Section 11 -A as the enquiry proceedings , on being found bad,have to be ignored altogether. The management fora limited purpose of showing at the preliminary stage that the action taken against the appellant was just and proper and that full opportunity of hearing was given to her in consonance with the principles

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] of natural justice . This contention has not been accepted by the Labour Court and the enquiry has been held to be bad . In view of the nature of objections raised by the appellant, the record of enquiry conducted by the management ceased tobe "material on record" within the meaning of Section 11 -A and the only course open to the management was to justify its action by leading fresh evidence before Labour Court . If such evidence has not been led , the management has to suffer the consequences . "

10. In view of the above legal position the proceedings of the domestic enquiry including evidence recorded by the enquiry officer , is to be ignored to prove charges leveled against the workman and to justify action against the workman . The management can only rely on fresh evidence i.e. evidence adduced subsequent to the order dated 26-07-2006 passed by the Tribunal whereby the proceedings of the domestic enquiry held vitiated due toviolation ofprinciple of natural justice.

11. In the charge sheet dated 6-7-1981 , the charges leveled against the workman for alleged misconduct are as under:

" आपके द्वारा लिपिक पद श्रेणी सी वर्ग ( डी) का पद भार सेवा अनुबन्धके अनुसार दिनांक 2-6-78 से संभाल लिया गयाकिन्तु सेवायें स्थाई होने के उपरान्त आपके द्वारा अपने कुछ सहकर्मियों अन्य वरिष्ठ कर्मचारियों को सुपरसीड करते हुए (बी) श्रेणी को प्राप्त करने के हेतु अभ्यावेदन देने हेतु उकसाया गया । जब आपके अभ्यावेदन पर विचार हो ही रहा था आपने बिना उचित माध्यम के मंत्रालय से सीधा सम्पर्क स्थापित किया तथा मंत्रालय के निर्णय की प्रतिक्षा किए बिना ही आपके द्वारा पुनः राजनैतिक व्यक्तियों से सीधा सम्पर्क स्थापित कर प्रबंधक मण्डल पर जोर डलवा कर अपना स्वार्थ सिद्ध करने की कोशिश कीगई ।

आपके द्वारा बहुत सी असत्य बातें अखबारों में छपवा कर कम्पनी तथा प्रबंधक मण्डल की गलत रूप से आलोचना करके संस्थान की छवि को धूमिल किया गया तथा इसके लिए आपके कार्यालय से अनाधिकृत रूप से संबंधित फाइल ले गये एवं पत्राकों कीप्रतियां अनाधिकृत रूप से बनवाई , जिनका तथा अखबारों की कटिंग का प्रदर्शन आपके द्वारा कम्पनी परिक्षेत्र एवं बाहर किया गया।

आपके द्वारा यह धमकी दी गई कि यदि किसी अधिकारी द्वारा आपके कुकृत्य की शिकायत करने की कोशिश की गई तो आप अपने सहकर्मियों से झूठी गवाही दिलवाकर उन्हें झूठे मामलों में फंसादेंगे ।

आपने अखबारों में इस आशय की झूठी खबर छपवाने की व्यवस्था की कि' आई. टी. आई. के कागजातों की रद्दी विक्रेताओं द्वारा बिक्री', जिससे अनाधिकृत रूप से फाइल ले [भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

6579

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

उगने पर. आप अपने आपको चोरी के आरोप से बचा सकें । आपके द्वारा प्रेस में भ्रष्टाचार उन्मूलन समिति का गठन' शीर्षक से समाचार पत्रों में छपवा कर कम्पनी को कलंकित करने का प्रयास किया गया है ।

आपने अपनी स्वार्थ सिद्धि की प्राप्ति हेतु परिस्थितियों एवं तथ्यों कोतोड़ - मरोड़ कर निन्दनीय ढंग से प्रस्तुत किया हैजिसकी किकम्पनी के कर्मचारी से कल्पना नहीं की जा सकती । आपका उक्त कृत्य एवं आचरण कम्पनी के स्थायी आदेशों के निम्न प्रावधानों के अन्तर्गत दुराचरण है :

14.2 Abetment of or attempt to commit, or commission ofany misconduct or act subversive of discipline.

14.5Approaching higher or political authorities direct or through other person or exerting external pressure for promotion, transfer or any other gain or inconnection with any representation except through proper channel . If any person writes or otherwise brings political or other pressure to further a workman's case it will be assumed that he has done. sowiththe knowledge and approval ofthe concerned worker and he (worker) will be liable for action under sub-paraabove.

14.17 Disclosing to any unauthorised person orpersons any information in regard to the working process of the factory, which comes into the possession of the employee during the course of theirwork.

14.24 Distribution or exhibition within the Company's premises of any newspaper or bills or pamphlets orposters without the previous sanction oftheManager.

14.28 Collecting of signatures for collective representationduring working hours.

14.31 Theft, fraud, or dishonesty or wilful damage in connection with the Company's business orproperty or any of the organizations sponsored bythe Company.

14.32 Gambling, drunkenness , riotous , disorderly or indecent behaviour or any act subversive ofdiscipline or efficiency in the premises oftheCompany.

14.33 Threatening or intimidating , molesting or assaulting any employee or employees of the Company in connection with and/or arising out of his employment withthe Company.

14.46 Not maintaining absolute integrity or notmaintaining devotion of duty which is expected ofaloyal employee ofthe Company.

14.54 Breach ofany Standing Order , violation ofanycondition or contract ofemployment or lawful instructions issuedby the Management from timeto timeand for thetime being in force.

आपकी अनुशासनहीनता की पराकाष्ठा कम्पनी के प्रति गैर जिम्मेदारीपन तथा सत्यनिष्ठा के अभाव को ध्यान में रखते हुए विचारणीय है कि आपकी सेवाओं को चालू रखना कम्पनी के स्थाई आदेश अनुच्छेद 18( 1 ) के अन्तर्गत कम्पनी के हित में कहां तक है ।

अतः आप निम्न हस्ताक्षरकर्ता को इस आरोप पत्र की प्राप्तिके तीन दिन के अन्दर अपना लिखित स्पष्टीकरण इस संबंध में दें । यदि आपने अपना स्पष्टीकरण उपरोक्त सभ्य में न दिया तो यह समझा आएगा कि आपको इस संबंध में कोई स्पष्टीकरण नहीं देना है और इस संबंध में अनुशासन की यथोचित अग्रिम कार्यवाही की जायेगी ।

कृते इण्डियन टेलीफोन इण्डस्ट्रीज लि. ह./- अधिकृत अधिकारी 12.Toprove the aforesaid charges themanagement has examined Smt. Sashi Bala Singh who has stated that duringperiod from 9-9-75 to 17-10-2002, she was working under the opposite party as Sr. Administrative OfficeAsstt. She has not deposed anything against the workman regarding alleged charges . She has stated that Anil Garg, S.N. Dhobal , Manju Lal, B.N. Gupta, Ajay Sharma, M.P. Pillai and Arvind agarwal are now not working in the company. She has further stated that sither they have retired or left the services and their present address are not available and they are not available on the address given bythem. She has further stated that documents in fileA2- 18which have been mentioned in the list ofdocuments A2 , 17, bear the signatures of said persons. She has further stated that documents filed along with list ofdocumentsC- 38 alsobear the signatures ofthe aforementioned persons . Incross -examination she has admitted that the workman had never worked with him. When.charge sheet was issued by Karmik Vibhag to the workman, she was in Personal Section and she had not dealt with the file ofthe workman . Shehas also stated that she had heard about the death of Shri S. N. Dhobal. As regard remaining witnesses she was not sure whether they are still alive or not . She has also shown her ignorance about their retirement .

13. In rebuttal, apart from reiterating the averments made in his statement of claim , the workman has stated that the representation dated 10-12-1978 against the unjust act ofthe management appointing him against the post of category 'D' Clerk instead of category ' C' Clerk , was submitted by him through proper channel and later on in this regard a joint representation was also given to the PrimeMinisteron 18-11-1980 by A. K. Choudhry, and said 6580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

Therefore, on this ground also proceedings have been vitiated.

16. In support of his contentions reliance has been placed on the following case laws :

matter was also raised by the union but the management deliberately started corresponding with the workman by addressing the reply to the said representations in his name to save Shri R.C. Srivastava, who was working in Karmik Vibhag. This was done to create evidence against the workman for initiating proceedings againsthim.

1. 1969 AIR, AP 155 PK Swami Vs South Eastern Railway.

2. 1986 SCC. (L & S) 662 Sawai Singh Vs State of Rajasthan.

3. 1961 AIR, Calcutta page no . 40 Amulya Ratan Mukherjee Vs Dy. ChiefMechanical EngineerEastern Railway&others.

4. 1963 AIR, Tripura page no . 20 Union of India Vs Kula Chandra Sinha.

5. 1963 AIR, Allahabad page no. 55 Vijay Lakshmi Sugar Mills Vs Mathura Prasad & others .

6. 1971 AIR SCC page no . 752 Surath Chandra ChakrabertyVs State ofWestBengal.

7. 2001 AIR SCC 3207 Rajinder Prasad( dead)by L. Rs . Appellant Vs Smt. Darshana Devi Respondent.

8. 1975 AIR SCC 1748 Ashok Duli Chand Vs Madhav LalDubey& Another .

9. 1988 AIR SCC 1274 Laxmi Raj Shetty Vs State of Tamilnadu.

10. 1971 ( 2) SCC617 M/ s Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs the workman & others.

14. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that charges leveled against the workman stand proved by the documents filed by the management and secondary evidence of Smt. Sashi Bala Singh. He has further submitted that soon after removal from service, the workman made a request dated 27-5-1982 for issuance of experience certificate for the purpose of registration in Bar Counsel, Allahabad and got enrolled himselfas anAdvocate on 11-6-1982 and he is a practicing lawyer. Thus the movement the workman got himself register with Bar Counsel ofU.P. , he ceased to be a workman under I.D. Act. He has also submitted that the enquiry officer, Presenting Officer and other witnesses have left organization long back and they are not available on the addresses available with the company. Shri S. N. Dhobal has expired long back. In such circumstances no primary evidence could be produced. Smt. Sashi Bala Singh the thenAsstt. Manager (HR) has been examined to prove the signatures of the enquiry officer, presenting officer and other witnesses on the relevant documents pertaining to domestic enquiry. In support of his contentions he has relied on 2007 ( 112) FLR 865 SCC Muir Mills Unit ofNTC (U.P.) Ltd. and Swayam Prakash Srivastava and another and 2007 ( 114) FLR 1176 Peter Ramesh Kumar and Director, Marshalls Power and Communication India (P) Ltd. , Chennai and others .

17. I have given my thoughtful consideration on the rivals submissions of both sides .

15. Per contra, the learned representative on behalf ofthe workman has urged that charges against the workman are vague and ambiguous. There is no specific allegations and particulars about date, time and persons . He has also urged that mere production of the documents by the management does not amount to proof. The management has failed to prove the documents filed to substantiate the charges.Hehas urged that material witnesses has not been examined by the management and no fresh evidence has been adduced by the management to prove the alleged charges .He has further urged that the workman had denied the alleged charges in his statement on

( affidavit but as regards alleged charges there is no cross- examinationbythe management side . He has further urged that management has filed only photocopies of clippings of the newspapers but the same have not been proved. Photocopies of the documents are not admissible moreover , judicial notice can not be taken of the facts stated in the news items being nature of secondary evidence and only hearsay evidence . It is also urged that it is evident from the chargesheet itself that punishment for the alleged misconduct is also proposed in the charge sheet itself.

18. The contention of the learned representative on behalf of the management that after registration of the workman as an Advocate in the Bar Counsel of Uttar Pradesh, he seized to be a workman is not sustainable . The facts ofthe case laws cited in support ofhis contention are different. In2007 ( 112) FLR 865 SCC the respondent was offered appointment as Legal Assistant in the litigation section inMuir Mills a subsidiary of the NTC Ltd. and the questionunder consideration was whether a legal assistant isaworkmanwithin the definition of section 2(z) ofthe U.P. I.D. Act. In view of the above facts Hon'ble Apex Court heldthat respondent no . 1 is a professional and never can beprofessional be termed as workman in any law. Similarly in 2007 (114) FLR 1167 SCC petitioner was a practicing lawyer who worked for respondent company and made certain claims against the company claiming that he is entitled to get Travelling allowance and 3 months pay. In thiscontextHon'ble Madras High Court held that petitioner was an expert in law who agreed to act as consultant therefore, he is not workman under Section 2(s) ofthe I.D. Act.but inpresent case admittedly the workman was initially appointed as category ' D' clerk in ITI , Raibareilly and 658-1 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

papers have been given nor contents of the alleged false facts have been mentioned.

subsequent tohis termination from service , he got himself registered as an Advocate . In above facts and circumstances when his services were terminated, he was a workman within definition of 2(s) of the I.D. Act. Therefore, theprinciple laid down in the case laws citedby the learned representative on behalf of the management are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

22. It is further alleged that the workman taken away the relevant file and unauthorised copies of letters and newspapers clippings which were later exhibited within thecompanypremises , but neither particulars or details of file nor the letters said. to be distributed and exhibited by the workman have been mentioned.

23. It is also alleged that the workman threatened the officers ofthe company to implicate them in false case ifany complaint is made against him but no particulars havebeengiven regarding when and whom he gave such threatening.

24. In charges leveled against the workman it is further alleged that the workman arranged to published news alleging that the documents of the ITI have been sold inorderto create defence for alleged charge for taking away files of the company unauthorisedly and he also got published news regarding constitution of a committee for removal ofcorruption to tarnish the image of the company. But neither the name of the newspaper, date ofpublication ismentioned nor the contents of the news said to be published have been mentioned. It is further alleged that the workman misrepresented the facts and circumstances to serve his own interest . But it is not clear what facts and circumstances were misrepresented byhim.

19. In 1986 SCC L & S 662 Sawai Singh Vs State of Rajasthan has observed that charges involving consequences of termination of service must be specific, & there mustbe fair play in action particularly in a departmental enquiry entailing adverse penal consequences like loss ofjob which means loss of livelihood. In 1971.AIR -SC 752 Hon'ble Apex Court held that without giving the particulars as to date , time , place and person charge is vague. In2007 (1 ) SCC L & S 254 Government ofAndhra Pradesh and others Vs Venkata Raidu , the alleged charges against the delinquent was regarding violation of government order but details of that order were not mentioned in the charge, Hon'ble Apex Court observed thatchargesheet should not be vague but should be specific and the authority should have mentioned the date of government order said to have been violated by the respondent and the number of that government order etc. Since the charge was not specific , hence no findings of guilt canbe fixed on the basis of that charge. In 1991 SCC L & S 249 K. Singh Vs Commissioner of Police Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that document not mentioned in the charge-sheet cannot be relied on or even referred toby disciplinary authority.

20. Thus it is well settled legal position that charge- sheet must be specific and must set out all the necessary particulars . The delinquent should be told of the charges towhich he is called upon to show cause and the charges must be specific and particulars must be stated without which adelinquent cannot defend himself.

25. Moreover , there is no separate statement of allegationalongwith charges leveled against the workman giving all necessary particulars, which would satisfy the requirement of giving reasonable opportunity to put up defence. It is evident from the record that the workman repeatedly brought it to the notice of the management concernedthatcharges are extremely vague and indefinite despite this, the management did not furnish facts , circumstances, and particulars relevant to the charges. It is alsoevident from the bare perusal of the charges leveled against the workman that same are general in nature and neither particulars pertaining to date , month or year of alleged misconduct are mentioned nor particulars of any documents or person have been mentioned in the alleged charges. Thus, there is force in the contention ofthe learned representative on behalf of the workman that charges are very vague and the workman cannot held guilty on such charges.

26. This legal position is not disputed that statement written or verbal , ofrelevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found or, who is incapable ofgiving evidence, orwhose attendance cannot be procured without an amount of delay or expenses which under the circumstances appears to unreasonable are themselves relevant fact and such may be proved by secondary evidence.

21. Inpresent case in charges leveled against the workman, it is alleged that workman encouraged co- workers to give their representation without proper channel . The names of the co- worker said to be encouraged by the workman have not been mentioned. It is also alleged that when the representation of the workman was under consideration he approached the political person directly and tried to pressurize the management without waiting the decision of the concerned Ministry. But no name of anypolitical leader through whom the workman allegedly pressurized the management is disclosed. Moreover, it is also not clear to whom such representations were made and who were the persons in the management said to be pressurizedby the workman. It is further alleged that the workmangotpublished false allegations in the newspaper andtherebytarnished the image ofthe company but charge inthis regard is very vague neither particulars ofthe news

27. It is also trite that though Strict rules ofEvidence Actare notapplicable and strict proof of legal evidence as required in criminal cases to prove the charges beyonds 3689 G1/09-28 6582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii) ]

from this it is not evident from the newspaper clippings produced by the management that contents there inwere given by the workman ."

reasonable doubt, is not required in the matter of enquiries but that does not mean that where issues are seriously contested and have to be established and proved, the requirement relating to proof can be dispensed with . No order entailing penal consequences can be made on the basis of hearsay evidence or ex - parte statements of witnesses .

30. Thus in the light of above legal position, news item in photocopies of newspaper clippings are not admissible.Moreover, News paper report by themselves is not evidence ofthe contents thereof, those report are only hearsay evidence & thsese have to be proved . Newspaper report isbased on secondary evidence of its contents and it isnot admissible without proving of the contents . Apart from this it is not evident from the newspaper clippings producedby the management that contents therein were givenby the workman or there was any role ofthe workman inpublication ofthe alleged news items .

28. In present case no material witness has been examinedto prove the alleged charges leveled against the workman. The only witness examined by the management side is Smt. Sashi Bala Singh who has said nothing about thecontentsofany document pertaining to charges leveled against the workman. She has only stated that the letters contained infile No.A2-18 bear signatures of R. K. Sharma, V. K. Mathur,G. P. Sabhal , Anil Garg, S. N. Dhobal , A. K. Sharma, V. N. Gupta and Ratan Singh and documents which have been filed alongwith list of documents also bears signature of Sh .Ratan Singh , R. K. Sharma,. On the basis of said deposition it is not proved which particular document bears signature of which particular person amongst thepersons named by her . She has also not stated that she had ever worked with any of them and had any occasion to recognize their signatures. Therefore , merely , on the basis of her statement that documents in said file bear the signatures of the persons named by her , the documents could not be said to be proved.

29. Moreover, in the said fileA- 18 document at serial no. 11-21 and 30 and 31 in the list enclosed therein, are news paper clippings . Except at serial no. 21 and 30 remaining are photocopies of news paper clippings. In 1988 AIR SC page 1274 Laxmi Raj Shetty Vs State ofTamilnadu has observed that:

(

31. Document at serial nos . 1 to 8 are copies of the charge sheet, reply of the workman and letter written by. the workmanduring enquiry proceedings said documents have been admitted by the workman . Document at sl . no . 9 iscopyoftheproceeding and order dt. 25-10-81, 1-11-81 which have been denied by the workman and document at serial no . 10 is copies of the statements of witnesses S. N. Dhobal ,ManjuNath, B. N. Gupta, A. Sharma, M. P. Pillai and A. Agarwal during enquiry proceedings and the contents in the said documents have been denied by the workman. The management has not produced any evidence to prove the documents , which have been disputed or denied by the workman. Smt . Sashi Bala Singh has only referredthe letters in file A2-18 bearing signature of Sh . R. K. Sharma and V. K. Mathur and others but she has not deposed and proved the signatures on the statements of witnesses said to be died or not available . Neither the contentofthe documents nor signatures on the documents produced by the management have been proved. Merely statingwithout referring any specific document that letters contained in the file A2-18 bear the signature of persons named by her and documents enclosed with the list C- 38 also bears signatures of Sh . Ratan Singh and R. K. Sharma, it cannot be said that the management has discharge its burden to prove the documents by secondary evidence. The management witness Smt . Sashi Bala Singh has also not proved the signature of the workman on the disputed documents , which have been denied by him. Therefore, there is neither any primary evidence nor any secondary evidence of the management on the record to prove the charges for alleged misconduct. Merely, submission of documents is not sufficient to prove the documents & pleadings are no substitute of proof. Moreover , the documents on the basis ofwhich charges have been leveled against the workman cannot be considered if they have not been referred in the chargesheet. In instant case there is no specific reference of document , filed by the management in the charge sheet . Thus , the management has failed to prove the charges leveled against the workman on the basis of fresh evidence adduced under Section 11- Aofthe I.D. Act .

"Judicial notice can not be taken of the facts stated in news item being in the nature of secondary evidence unless proved by aliunde A report in a newspaper is only hearsay evidence. A newspaper is not once of the documents referred to in section 78(2) of the Evidence Act by which an allegation of fact canbe proved . The presumption of genuineness attached under Section( 81) of the Evidence Act to a newspaper report cannot be treated as proved ofthe facts reported therein. A statement of fact contained in a newspaper is merely hearsay and therefore in admissible in evidence in the absence of the maker ofthe statement appearing in court and deposing to have perceived the fact reported. " Thus in the light ofabove legal position news item in photo copies of news paper clippings are not admissible . It is well settled legal position that news papers clippings are not admissible evidence . News-paper report by themselves are not evidence of the contents there of,those report are only hearsay evidence & these have to be proved. Newspaper report is based on secondary evidence of its contents and it is not admissible without proving of the contents . Apart भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

[भाग II-खंड 3( ii) ]

32. In view of the above discussion all the charges leveled against the workman stand not proved & he is entitled for exoneration from the charges leveled against him.

33. Now the question survives for consideration is whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement with backwages and other consequential benefits.

34. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that after removal from companyservices the workman made a request on 27-5-82 for issuance of experience certificate for the purpose of registrationbefore the Bar Counsel, U.P. , Allahabad and soonafter removal from company services he enrolled as anAdvocate on 11-6-82 & this fact is established by letter ofOffice Supdt. , Bar Counsel, UP Allahabaddt . 2-11-06 and workman is practicing in various courts of the Raibareilly district . He has further contended that the workmanwas gainfully employed as a legal professional duringpendencyof litigation therefore, he is not entitled for back wages . He has further contended that the management has offered him reinstatement before this Tribunal and given an opportunity to join duty within stipulated period but he refused the offer which is evident from his cross examination therefore , the workman has abandoned his claim otherwise also he being an Advocate relief of reinstatement can not be granted. He has further contended that even if termination is illegal back wages cannot be awarded as a matter ofright.

35. In rebuttal, the learned representative on behalf ofthe workman has not denied this fact that workman subsequent to his termination from service got himself registered as an Advocate but he has urged that mere on this ground that workman is now doing practice presumption regarding his income can not be drawn. He has also urged that gainful employment is essential and legal profession can never said to be employment; mere on this ground. That the workman got himself registered as an Advocate, he can not be deprived from back wages . He was also urged that the workman was not earning from practice therefore, he had to worcas Assistant under other Advocate andhe has been doing clerical work and for that he is earning a very meager amount. He is living in lower income group house of the Raebarelly Vikas Pradhikarn allotted on instalment. He had to sell his parental property for marriage ofhis daughter. In case of invalid order of dismissal , the workman is entitled for his reinstatement with back wages and other consequential benefits . In support of his contentions he has cited number of case laws inhiswritten argument but during his oral submission on the point of back wages , he has placed reliance on following case laws:

1. 1989 ( 1 ) UPLBEC 143 Rajendra Prasad Srivastava Vs StateofU.P& Other (Alld. Weekly cases 1989 page 377).

6583 2. 1984AIR SC 1829 Lab I.C. 1446SM Saiyad Vs. Baroda Municipal Corporation.

3. 1991 AIR SCC 1490 Om Prakash Goel Vs. Himachal PradeshTourism Development Corpn. Ltd. , Shimla &another.

36. I have given my thoughtful consideration on the rival submission of both the sides .

37. In support the contention of the learned representative of the workman that joining of legal profession cannot be said to be employment, he has relied on [ 1989 ( 1 ) UPLBEC 143 ] Rajendra Prasad SrivastavaVs. State of U.P. & others. In said case petitioner after his suspension started legal practice while considering the questionwhether the petitioner was in gainful employment duringthe period of suspension , Hon'ble Allahabad Court has observedthat " Joining legal fraternity cannot be said tobe employment and joining of legal fraternity could not disentitle the petitioner to claim his arrears ofsalary from the date he was suspended."

38. But in (2009) 1 SCC (L& S) 502 Niranjan Cinema Vs. Prakash Chandra Duby & another Hon'ble Apex Court while considering the question of gainful employment , has observed as under:

"Gainful employment would also include self- employmentwherefrom income is generated. Income either from employment in an establishment or from self-employment merely differentiates the sources fromwhich income is generated, the end use being the same."

39. Inthe said case Hon'ble Apex Court has relied on its earlier decision in 2008 (8) SCC L & S 718 wherein respondent was earning from Agriculture to maintain himself. Hon'ble Court observed that "Labour Court was not justified inholding that merely because the respondent was receiving agriculture income , he cannot be treated engaged in gainful employment."

40. Thus , inview ofthe above legal proposition laid downbyHon'ble Apex Court employment in strict sense is not sine qua non for gaitafal employment . Ifthe workman is earning or generating income as an Advocate it can not be said that he was not in gainful employment. Therefore , the contentionofthe learned representative ofthe workman that since legal profession is not an employment, the workman cannot be said to be in gainfal employment, is not tenable .

41. Moreover , the burden was on the workman to provethat he was not in gainfully employed. In 2006 SCC 47U.P. StateBrassware Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Udai Narain Pandey Hon'bleApex Court has held that:

"It is now well settled by various decisions of this court that although earlier this court insisted employer to raise the plea ofgainful employment but 6584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24 , 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] having regard to provision of Section 106 of the Evidence Act or provision analogous thereto, the said plea should be raised by the workman. "

45. In recent decision ( 2009) 1 SCC (L & S) 595 Novartis India Ltd. Vs. State ofWest Bengal and another Hon'ble Apex court has observed that:

42. In recent decision (2009 ) 1 SCC ( L & S) 372 Managing Director, Balasaheb Desai Sahakari S. K. Ltd. Vs. Kashinath Ganapati Kambale Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that;

"It is now well settled by a catena of decisions of this court that having regard to the principles contained in Section 106 of the Evidence Act, the burden ofproof to show that the workman was not gainfully employed is not on the employer . The employee has to show that he was not gainfully employed. The initial burden to prove this fact is on theworkman.

"Back wages cannot be granted almost automatically upon setting aside an order of termination inter alia on the premise that the burden to show that the workman, was gainfully employed during the interregnum period was on the employer . The Supreme Court in number of cases decisions opined thatgrant ofback wages is not automatic . The burden ofproofthat he remained unemployed would be on the workman keeping in view the provisions contained in Section 106 of the Evidence Act , 1872 . Hon'ble Apex Court has further observed that as regards grant of back wages or the quantum thereof, would, therefore, depend on the fact of each case . Back wages are ordinarily to be granted, keeping in view the principles of grant of damages in mind. It cannot be claimed as a matter of right." 43. In instant case , the workman's services were terminated in the year 1982 & the statement of claim in the Tribunal has been submitted in the year 2002. But the workmanhas not raised plea that he did not remain gainfully employed. Prior to the decision of the preliminary issue, he submitted an application A1-26 wherein he stated that he is in practice since 1982 and disclosed the meager income saidtobe earned from his practice. He also stated that he is working as Assistant of Sri R. S. Trivedi , Advocate . In support ofsaid application he did not file his affidavit. But after the decision of the preliminary issues in affidavit submitted in rebuttal of the management evidence under Section 11 -A of the I.D. Act, he has not categorically mentioned what actual income he was earning from legal profession. He has also not adduced any documentary evidencein support ofhis income. He has also not examined Sri R. S. Trivedi under whom he said to be worked as an Assistant .

46. The learned representative on behalf of the management has argued that the workman was removed from service in the year 1982 and present reference for adjudication has been made in the year 2002 for this inordinate delay the workman is responsible because he raised the dispute in wrong forum under U.P. I.D. Act. 1947, whereas the learned representative on behalf of the workman has urged that the workman can not be held responsible for delay. The workman filed his conciliation casebefore concerned authority under U.P. I , D . Act 1947 and IT( II) Lucknow held that domestic enquiry was just and fair against that order the management filed a writ petitiont 4061/84 which dismissed on 16-12-97 and subsequent to that the management challenged the jurisdiction of the I.T. ( II) as state of U.P. was not appropriate government as far as ITI Ltd. , Raibareilly is concerned. The management itself raised the objection regarding jurisdiction at a very belated stage and management is also responsible for the inordinate delay in the present matter .

44. In (2005) 5 SCC 124 Allahabad Jal Sansthan Vs. Daya Shankar Rai Hon'ble Apex court considering the question ofback wages has observed as under :

47. In 1984 AIR SCC 129 SM Saiyad Vs Baroda Municipal Corporation Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that denial of back wages or a portion of period for the reason that he was prosecuting remedy in a wrong forum would not be a relevant consideration for refusal of back wages.

48. In the light of above legal proposition, the workman cannot be denied the back wages merely on this ground that he is responsible for prosecuting remedy in a wrongforum.

"We have referred to certain decisions of this court to highlight that earlier in the event of an order of dismissal being set aside, reinstatement with full back wages was the usual result. But now with the passage of time, it has come to be realized that industry is being compelled to pay the workman for a period during which he apparently contributed little or nothing at all , for a period that was spent unproductively, while the workman is being compelled to go back to a situation which prevailed many years ago when he was dismissed . It is necessary for us to develop a pragmatic approach to problems dogging industrial relations . However , no just solution can be offered but the golden mean may be arrived at . "

49. As regard contention of the learned representative on behalf of the management that since the workman is an Advocate relief of reinstatement in service cannot be granted , is concerned , it has no substance. Certainly, as an Advocate the workman can not join any 6585 [भाग II-खंड 3(ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : अक्तूबर 24, 2009/ कार्तिक 2, 1931

years from the date of his dismissal till the date of reinstatement. However, we would like to make it clear that it is opento the Corporation to proceed withthe disciplinary enquiry if it so chooses ."

service under relevant rules ofthe concerned Bar Council but ifthe workman wants to join service, he can do so by getting his enrollment as an Advocate suspended. It is for theworkmanto decide whether he wants to join the service incase ofhis reinstatement or he wants to continue in legal profession. The relief of reinstatement can not be denied merely on this ground that presently the workman is enrolled as an Advocate .

50. The learned representative on behalf of the workman has cited AIR 1991 SCC 1490 and AIR 1984 SCC 1829 in support of his contention regarding grant of back wages . InAIR 1991 SCC 1490 the petitioner was practicing as a lawyer ever since his services were terminated. Inthe rejoinder, hemerely stated that he was not earning much in that profession.At the stage ofhearing in Hon'ble Supreme Court, thepetitioner filed an affidavit stating therein that histotal income from 1985 onwards till the date of filing of his affidavit was only Rs . 15,550. In affidavit he also stated that he was practicing as an Income Tax Advocate ever sincehis enrolment in Oct. 1982 but, however , he asserted that he got his first brief in the year 1985 and other side contradicted the said averments in such circumstances , while consideringthe question ofback wages and its earlier decision in AIR 1984 SCC 1829 Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under :

"Under these circumstances we cannot make a roving enquiry nor it would be possible for the Corporation to unearth the income which the petitioner would have derived as a practicing advocate. There are many imponderables and conjecture too . Under these circumstances we asked both the counsel to suggest a solution. We have heard both the sides on this aspect elaborately Sri P.P.Rao, learnedcounsel for the petitioner submitted thateven ifthe relevant period is to be treated as one ofsuspensionpending enquiry the petitioner would have been entitled to the subsistence allowance till his reinstatement. That atleast should be the criteria in. granting the back wages in a situation like this. We think this is a reasonable and fair suggestion .

51. In instant case indisputedly the workman's services were terminated w.e.f. 23-4-82 and he enrolled himselfon 11-6-1982 . The workman has filed his statement ofclaim in thisTribunal after 18 years from the date ofhis enrolment as an Advocate but he has not raised any plea that he was not gainfully employed. Earlier the burden to provethatworkman was in gainful employment was on the employer but as stated earlier in view ofthe principle laid downby theHon'ble Supreme Court initial burden was on theworkmanto prove that he was not gainfully employed during the period he remained out of job. Even in his affidavitfiled in the rebuttal of the management evidence under section 11 -A of the I.D. Act, he has not categorically mentioned his income as an Advocate . He has simply stated that in his earlier application he has mentioned particulars about his salary which he is getting as Assistant or as a Munshi of other Advocates . In cross examination he has stated that as a Assistant of Sri R.S. Trivedi he is getting Rs . 550 per month only. the management has not adduced any evidence regarding his income nor it was possible for the management to reveal his actual income which the workman would have derived as a practicing Advocate.The statement ofthe workman in his own favour without corroboration from other documentary or oral evidence cannot be regarded as sufficient evidence to come tothis conclusion that after 25 years ofhis enrolment as an Advocate he is earning the said meager amount only, particularly in view of this fact that during his cross- examination he has not shown his inclination to join the servicewithout getting complete relief claimed by him .But in absence of any evidence of the management in rebuttal regarding income of the workman as an Advocate , it is not possible for the Tribunal to unearth the income of the workman as an Advocate during the period of litigation. In such circumstances whatever he has disclosed may be considered as income by gainful employment during the saidperiod. Inhis affidavit he has stated that presently he is earning Rs . 550 per month only and details of earlier income have been mentioned in his application submitted in the Tribunal . In application A1-26 dt. 1-4-2004 he has disclosed his income as under:

1. July 1982 to March 1990 Rs. 250 p.m. x 93 = Rs. 23,250

2. April 1990 to June 1994 Rs. 300 p.m. x 51 = Rs . 15,300

Rs. 400 p.m. x 93 = Rs. 37,200

3. July 1994 to March 2002

Rs. 550 p.m. x 11 = Rs . 6,050

4. April 2002 to Feb 2003

Total

Rs. 81800

Therefore, admittedly he has earned Rs . 81,800 during theperiodJuly 1982 to Feb. 2003 and Rs. 41,250 fromMarch "In the result of termination order is quashed and consequently the petitioner shall be reinstated in service.However, he shall be entitled to the full back wages upto the date of his enrolment as a lawyer which was in the month ofOct. 1982. From the date of his enrolment upto the date of reinstatement he shall be entitled to the back wages at the rate ofhalf ofthe subsistance allowance per month and the total amount shall be computed on thatbasis. Out of that the income ofRs . 15,550admittedly earned by him as apracticing lawyer shall be deducted and thebalance amount shall be paid to the petitioner. The amount sopaid tohim shall , for the purpose of income-tax , be spread over as if derived during those financial 6586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : OCTOBER 24, 2009/KARTIKA 2, 1931

[PART II-SEC. 3(ii)]

और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध कर्नाटक राज्य के निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे, अर्थात्:

2003 to May 2009. Thus, admittedly his income as an Advocateduring the said period is Rs . 1,23,050 . In the light ofthe principle laid down in AIR 1991 SCC 1490 the said income is also to be considered while awarding back wages . क्र. राजस्व ग्राम का नाम होबली तालुक जिला

सं. नगरपालिका सीमाएं

1. अण्ण्गेिरी

अण्ण्गेिरी नवलगुंद धारवाड

[संख्या एस-38013/40/2009- एस.एस.- 1 ] एस. डी. जेवियर, अपर सचिव

New Delhi , the 5th October, 2009 52. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the aforementioned principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court as regard to grant of back wages in case of reinstatement , the interest ofjustice would be subserved by reinstating the workman with continuity ofservice and by awarding full back wages from the date ofhis removal from service to date of his enrolment as an Advocate i.e. 11-6-82 and 50% back wages from the date ofhis enrolment upto the date of reinstatement.

53. Accordingly, the reference under adjudication isanswered as under:

S.O. 2961. In excercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 ( 34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st Novermber, 2009 as the date on whichthe provisions of Chapter IV ( except Section 44 and 45which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- Vand VI [ except Sub- Section( 1) of Section 76 and Sections 77, 78 , 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Karnataka namely:

Sl. Name of the Re- Hobli Taluk District 1. Since charges leveled against the workman stand notproved, the impugned order dt. 23-4-1982 is not justified and the same is set aside and consequently, the workman shall be entitled for his reinstatement with continuity of his service from the date of his removal from the service by the said impugned order .

No. venue Village or

Municipal Limits

Annigere Navalgund Dharwad

1. Annigere

2. The workman shall be entitled for full back wages from the date of his removal to the date of his enrolment as andAdvocate i.e. 11-6-82 .

[No. S- 38013/40/2009-S.S- I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 8 अक्तूबर, 2009

3. From the date of his enrolment upto the date of reinstatement the workman shall be entitled 50% ofthe back wages .

4. Out ofthe amount which he will get as back wages the income of Rs . 1,23,050 admittedly, earnedby the workman as an Advocate shall be deducted and balance amount shall be paid to the workman.

54. The management of the Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Raibareilly is directed to comply the above orderwithin 8 weeks from the date of publication ofthis award.

का. आ. 2962.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34) की धारा-1 की उप धारा (3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 नवम्बर, 2009 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 (44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है ) अध्याय -5 और 6 [ धारा-76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा 77 , 78, 79 और 81 के सिवाय जो पहले प्रवृत्त की जा चुकी है ] के उपबंध राजस्थान राज्यके निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों में प्रवृत्त होंगे , अर्थात्:

55. Award as above .

N. K. PUROHIT, PresidingOfficer

1. " नगर- निगम, जोधपुर की सीमाओं [ पहले से ही क.रा.बी. अधिनियम, 1948 की धारा 1 ( 3 ) के तहत कार्यान्वित क्षेत्र एवंरीको औद्योगिक क्षेत्र, मण्डोर को छोड़कर के अन्तर्गत आनेवाला क्षेत्र ।"

नईदिल्ली, 5 अक्तूबर, 2009

2. "जिला-जोधपुर, तहसील जोधपुर के राजस्व ग्रामों गेंवा, सूथला, चौपासनी, चौखा, गोलासनी, बांगा , पाल , धीनाणा की ढाणी, कुडी- भगतासनी, डिगाडी, सीरीयादेनगर, अलकदडा, बासनी बंदा एवं झालामण्ड के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र ।"

का. आ. 2961.- कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948का 34) की धारा-1 कीउप धारा ( 3 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए केन्द्रीय सरकार एतद्वारा 1 नवम्बर, 2009 को उस तारीख के रूप में नियत करती है , जिसको उक्त अधिनियम के अध्याय -4 ( 44 व 45 धारा के सिवाय जो पहले से प्रवृत्त हो चुकी है) अध्याय-5 और 6 [ घारा 76 की उप धारा ( 1 ) और धारा -77, 78, 79

एवं [भाग -खंड 3( ii) ]

6587

भारत का राजपत्र: अक्तूबर 24, 2009/कार्तिक 2, 1931

3. " जिला कोषपुर; तहसील लूनी के राजस्व ग्रामों-तनाबडा, भाकरासनी, बासनी बाघेला, गांगाना, सालावास , नन्दवान , हीर खैडा, चावडों की ढाणी , खारडा भाण्डू, भाण्डूकलां, कटारडा, झेवर, डोली एवं बुझावड के अन्तर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र ।"

[संख्या एस-38013/41/2009- एस.एस.-1 ]

एस. डी. जेवियर, अपर सचिव New Delhi, the 8th October, 2009.

S.O. 2962. In excercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3 ) of Section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948 ) the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st November, 2009 as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV ( except Section 44 and 45which have already been brought into force) and Chapter- VandVI [except Sub- Section ( 1) ofSection 76 andSections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Rajasthan namely:

1. "The area comprising the limits ofMunicipal Corporation, Jodhpur [excluding the areas already implementedunder Section 1(3) ofthe E.S.I. Act, 1948 and RIICO Industrial Area, Mandore] ." 2. "The areas comprising the revenue villages of Gevan, Suthala, Chopasani, Chonkha , Golasni , Banga, Pal, Dhinana ki dhani , Kuri Bhagtasni , Digadi, Siriyade Nagar , Alakdara, Basni Bedan and Jhalamand in Tehsil Jodhpur, District Jodhpur."

AND

3. "The areas comprising the revenue villages of Tanawada , Bhakarasani , Basni Banghela , Gangana, Salawas , Nandwan , Heerkheda , Chawado ki Dhani , Kharda Bhadu, Bhandu Kalan, Katarda, Jhanwar, Doli and Bujhawar in Tehsil Looni District Jodhpur. "

[No. S- 38013/41/2009-S.S- I ] S. D. XAVIER, Under Secy.

Printed by the Manager , Govt. of India Press, Ring Road, Maya Puri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi- 110054, 2009