प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 23] नई दिल्ली, सितम्बर 4—सितम्बर 10, 2011, शनिवार/भाद्र 13—भाद्र 19, 1933
No. 23] NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 4—SEPTEMBER 10, 2011, SATURDAY/BHADRA 13—BHADRA 19, 1933
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग IIखण्ड 3उप-खण्ड (iii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)
केन्द्रीय अध्किारियों ;संघ राज्य क्षेत्रा प्रशासनों को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Orders and Notifications Issued by Central Authorities (other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
भारत निर्वाचन आयोग
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION नई दिल्ली, 7 सितम्बर, 2011
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6856 OF 2005
WITH
Civil Appeal Nos. 6868, 6869, 6870, 6871, 6872,
6887, 6888, 6889, 6890, 6892, 6893, 6894, 6895, 6896,
6910, 7043 and 6891 of 2005
आ.अ. 149.—लोक प्रतिनिध्त्वि अध्निियम, 1951 ;1951 का 43द्ध की धरा 106 के अनुसरण में, भारत निर्वाचन आयोग वर्ष 2005 की सिविल अपील संख्या 6856 में उच्चतम न्यायालय, नई दिल्ली के तारीख 13-7-2011 के आदेश को एतद्द्वारा प्रकाशित करता है ।
;संलग्न आदेश अंग्रेजी भाग में छपा हैद्ध
(Appeals under Section 116 A of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 from the Judgment and Order dated the 8th September, 2005 of the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Election Petition Nos. 21,11, 7, 18, 9, 6, 4, 17, 13, 15, 16, 20, 19, 10, 5, 8, 12 and 14 of 2004 respectively.) [सं. 82/सिक्किम-वि.स./;2004 का 14द्ध/2006]
Shri Sher Hang Subba etc. etc. .... Appellants
आदेश से,
Versus
Shri Deepak Kumar Gurung etc. ....Respondents अनुज जयपुरियार, सचिव
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
For full cause title please see Schedule ''A" Attached herewith.
New Delhi, the 7th September, 2011
13th July, 2011
CORAM :
240 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 10, 2011/BHADRA 19, 1933 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)] and deserve to be disposed of accordingly. Accordingly, all the appeals are disposed of as having become infructuous.Interim relief, if any, granted in each appeal For the Respondents : Mr. A. Mariarputham, Senior in all the appeals Advocate. (Ms. Aruna Mathur, M s . M e g h a G o u r a n d Mr. Yusef Khan, Advocates with him).
stands vacated."
: Mr. K.N. Rai, Advocate
And THIS COURT DOTH FURTHER ORDER that the Order of this Court dated 3rd March, 2006 passed in these appeals granting stay be and is hereby vacated.
The Appeals above-mentioned being called on for hearing before this Court on the 13th day of July, 2011; UPON perusing the record and hearing counsel for the parties herein, THIS COURT DOTH, inter-alia, PASS the following ORDER :
And THIS COURT DOTH LASTLY ORDER that this ORDER be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned;
Witness the Hon'ble Shri Sarosh Homi Kapadia, Chief Justice of India, at the Supreme Court, New Delhi, dated this the 13th day of July, 2011.
Sd/-
(SHELLY SEN GUPTA)
Deputy Registrar
[ No. 82/SKM-LA/(14 of 2004)/2006]
By Order,
ANUJ JAIPURIAR, Secy.
''xxx the learned senior counsel who appears on behalf of the elected candidates in all the appeals, states at the Bar that the Election Petitions were filed by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) challenging the elections which were held in the year 2004 after which fresh elections were held in the year 2009 and therefore, appeals have become infructuous. The statement made at the Bar by the learned counsel for the elected candidates is not disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant(s). Therefore, there is no manner of doubt that appeals have become infructuous