This Gazette may contains Multiple Subjects

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ( एन ) 04/0007/2003-05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/05

सत्यमेव जयते

भारत का राजपत्र The Gazette of India

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 48]

No. 48]

नई दिल्ली, नवम्बर 20 नवम्बर 26 , 2011 , शनिवार /कार्तिक 29 अग्रहायण 5 , 1933 NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 20- NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 , SATURDAY / KARTIKA 29- AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग ।।- खण्ड - उप- खण्ड ( ii ) PART 11-Section 3-Sub - section ( ii )

भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों ( रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर ) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)

वित्त मंत्रालय

( वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग )

दिल्ली , ।। नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3332. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम , 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उप - खंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित , बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण ) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उप - धारा 3 ( ज ) और ( 3- क ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , श्री अशोक कुमार गुप्ता ( जन्म तिथि 29-01-1957 ) , को उनकी नियुक्तिकी अधिसूचना की तिथि से तीन वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक , जो भी पहले हो , विजया बैंक के निदेशक मण्डल में अंशकालिक गैर- सरकारी निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 6/58/2010- बीओ -1 ]

विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव 4182 G1/ 2011

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(Department of Financial Services)

New Delhi , the 18th November , 2011

S. O. 3332. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section 3 ( h ) and ( 3 - A) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act . 1970/1980 read with sub - clause ( 1 ) of clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks ( Management & Miscellaneous Provisions ) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta ( DoB : 29-01-1957 ) as part - time non -official director on the Board ofDirectors of Vijaya Bank for a period of three years from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier.

{ F. No. 6/58/2010 -BO- 1 ]

VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy.

(8539) 8540

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) } THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

नई दिल्ली , 15 नवम्बर , 2011

Bank

का. आ. 3333. राष्ट्रीयकृत बैंक ( प्रबंध एवं प्रकीर्ण उपबंध ) स्कीम, 1970/1980 के खंड 3 के उपखंड ( 1 ) के साथ पठित, बैंककारी कंपनी ( उपक्रमों का अर्जन एवं अंतरण) अधिनियम , 1970/1980 की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 3 ) के खंड ( ख ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , नीचे दी गई सारणी के कालम 2 में विनिर्दिष्ट व्यक्तियों को उक्त सारणी के कालम 3 में विनिर्दिष्ट व्यक्तियों के स्थान पर इसके कालम ( 1 ) में विनिर्दिष्ट बैंकों के निदेशक के रुप में तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक नामित करती है :-

सेन्ट्रल बैंक आफ श्री आलोक टंडन , डॉ शशांक सक्सेना इंडिया

संयुक्तसचिव,

विनिवेश विभाग

श्री राजेश खुल्लर, श्री समीर के. सिन्हा यूनियन बैंक आफ

इंडिया

संयुक्त सचिव,

आई एंड आई

प्रभाग, आर्थिक

कार्य विभाग

इलाहाबाद बैंक श्री शशांक सक्सेना , श्रीमति सुकृति लिखी निदेशक, वित्तीय

सेवाएंविभाग

[फा. सं. 6/1/2010 -बीओ -1 ]

विजय मल्होत्रा, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th November, 2011 S.O. 3333. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( a) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies ( Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act , 1970/1980 read with sub-clause ( 1 ) of Clause 3 of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme , 1970/1980 , the Central Government , hereby nominate the persons specified in column 2 of the table below as Directors of the Banks specified in column } thereof in place of the persons specified in column 3 of the said table , with immediate effect and until further orders:-

TABLE

3 Central Bank

ofIndia

Sh . Samir

Union Bank Sh. Rajesh Khullar,

K. Sinha

ofIndia

JointSecretary, {& I Division, Deptt . of Economic Affairs

Smt . Sukriti Dr. Shashank

Allahabad

Likhi Saksena, Director, Deptt. of Financial Services

[F. No. 6/ 1 /2010 -BO- 1 } VIJAY MALHOTRA, Under Secy नई दिल्ली , 15 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3334. राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1981 ( 1981 का 61 ) की धारा6 की उपधारा ( 1 ) के खंड ( घ ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग , वित्त मंत्रालय, नई दिल्ली के संयुक्त सचिव ( बीए ) श्री उमेश कुमार को, तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आदेश होने तक श्री आलोक निगम के स्थान पर राष्ट्रीय कृषि और ग्रामीण विकास बैंक ( नाबार्ड ) के निदेशक मंडल में निदेशक के रूप में नामित करती है ।

[फा. सं. 6/1 /2010- बीओ-[] विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 15th November, 2011

S. O. 3334.-In exercise ofthe powers conferred by Clause (d) of the sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAct, 1981 (61 of 1981 ) , the Central Government, hereby nominate Shri Umesh Kumar, Joint Secretary ( BA) , Department of Financial Services , Ministry of Finance , New Delhi as a Director on the Board of Directors of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development ( NABARD) with immediate effect and until further orders vice Shri Alok Nigam.

[F. No. 6/ 1 /2010 -BO- 1 } VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

Dr. Shashank

Saksena

Sh . Alok Tandon , Joint Secretary Deptt. ofDis- investment

का. आ. 3335, भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक अधिनियम , 1934 (1934 का 2 ) की धारा 9 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार, एतद्वारा , श्री शरीफ उज्जमान लस्कर ( जन्म तिथि 31-12-1969) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तिथि से चार वर्षों की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेश होने तक , जो भी पहले हो , श्री सोवन कानूनगो के स्थान पर भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक के पूर्वी स्थानीय बोर्ड में अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी सदस्य के रूप में नियुक्त करती है ।

[फा. स. 1/3 /2010- बीओ- विजय मल्होत्रा , अवर सचिव [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011 S. O. 3335. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 9 of the Reserve Bank of India Act , 1934 (2 of 1934) , the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sharif Uz - zaman Laskar ( DoB : 31-12-1969 ) as part time non - official Member on the Eastern Local Board ofReserve Bank of India , for a period of four years from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders , whichever is earlier vice Shri Sovan Kanungo .

[F. No. 1 /3 /2010 -BO - I ]

VIJAY MALHOTRA , Under Secy . नई दिल्ली , 21 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3336. भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम श्रेणी 3 और श्रेणी 4 कर्मचारी ( सेवा के निबंधन और शर्तों का संशोधन ) नियमावली, 1985 के नियम 13 के उप नियम ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्रीय सरकार , एतद्वारा , यह निर्धारित करती है कि श्रेणी 3 और श्रेणी 4 के प्रत्येक कर्मचारी को 01 अप्रैल , 2010 को आरम्भ होने वाली और 31 मार्च , 2011 को समाप्त होने वाली अवधि के लिए बोनस के बदले में भुगतान , उक्त उप नियम में अन्य उपबंधो के अध्यधीन , उनके वेतन के 15 प्रतिशत की दर पर किया जाएगा ।

[फा. सं. 2/ 15/96- बीमा- III ] एस. के. मोहन्ती , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 21st November , 2011 S. O. 3336. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (2 ) of rule 13 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Class III and Class IV Employees ( Revision of Terms and Conditions of Service) Rules , 1985 , the Central Government hereby determine that , subject to the other provisions of the said sub - rule , the payment in lieu ofbonus for the period commencing on 1st day of April , 2010 and ending with 31st March , 2011 to every Class III and Class IV employee shall be at the rate of 15 percent of his / her salary.

[F. No. 2 / 15 / 96 - Ins.III ]

S. K. MOHANTY , Under Secy.

(राजस्व विभाग )

( सीमाशुल्क, केंद्रीय उत्पाद शुल्क व सेवा कर आयुक्त का कार्यालय , हैदराबाद- आयुक्तालय )

हैदराबाद , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

सं. 03 /2011 - कस. ( एन.टी. ) का. आ. 3337.-भारत सरकार , वित्त मंत्रालय , राजस्व विभाग , नई दिल्ली द्वारा जारी अधिसूचना सं. 33/94 कस्टम्स ( एन टी ) दिनांक 1-7-1994 यथा संशोधित और 83 / 2004 - कस ( एन टी ) दिनांक 30-6-2004 के तहत सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत प्रदत्त , शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैं , आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य

8541

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

के मेदक जिला , जिन्नाराम मण्डल के दोमडुगु गाँव को सीमाशुल्क अधिनियम , 1962 की धारा 9 के अंतर्गत भारत सरकार द्वारा स्वीकृत 100% निर्यात आधारित एकक के गठन के सीमित प्रयोजन के लिए भंडागारण क्षेत्र के रूप में घोषित करता हूँ ।

[फा. सी. सं. VIII/ 20 / 12 /2011- कस./तक.- I ] एस. एन . साहा , आयुक्त (Department of Revenue)

(Office of the Commissioner of Customs , Central Excise and Service Tax Hyderabad - I Commissionerate) Hyderabad , the 16th November , 2011 No. -03 /2011 - Cus . (N.T. )

S. O. 3337.- In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 delegated by Notification No. 33 / 94 - Cus (N.T. ) dated 1-7-1994 as amended and No. 83 /2004- Cus ( N.T. ) dated 30-6-2004 issued by the Ministry of Finance , Department of Revenue , New Delhi , I hereby declare Domadugu Village of Jinnaram Mandal , Medak District , Andhra Pradesh as a warehousing station under Section 9 of the Customs Act , 1962 for the limited purpose of setting up of 100% Export Oriented Undertakings as approved by the Government of India .

[ F. C. No. VIII/20/ 12 / 2011 - CUS /Tech . - I ]

S. N. SAHA , Commissioner

विदेश मंत्रालय

(सी.पी.वी. प्रभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 17 अक्तूबर 2011

का. आ. 3338.-राजनयिक और कोंसलीय ऑफीसर ( शपथ और फीस ) के अधिनियम , 1948 की धारा 2 के खंड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , केंद्र सरकार एतद्वारा श्री अशोक कुमार दतयाल , सहायक को 17-10-2011 से भारत के राजदूतावास , दोहा में सहायक कोंसुलर अधिकारी के कर्त्तव्यों का पालन करने के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।

[सं. टी . 4330/01/2006 ] आर. के. पेरिनडिया, अवर सचिव (कोंसुलर) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

(C.P.V. Division)

New Delhi , the 17th October, 2011 S. O. 3338. In pursuance of the clause ( a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers ( Oaths and Fees) Act , 1948 ( 41 of 1948 ) , the Central Government hereby authorize Shri Ashok Kumar , Datual , Assistant Embassy of India , Doha to perform the duties of Assistant Consular Officer with effect from 17th October , 2011

[No. T-4330/ 01 /2006 ] R. K. PERINDIA , Under Secy. ( Consular) 8542

[PART II-SBC . 3(ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

स्वास्थ्य तथा परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय

(स्वास्थ्यतथा परिवार कल्याण विभाग )

नई दिल्ली, 14 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3339.- भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान पारंषद् अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , केन्द्र सरकार , भारतीय आयुर्विज्ञान परिषद से परामर्श करने के बाद , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है, अर्थात्ः

उक्त अनुसूची में -

(क ) " बी.एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय , बिहार " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमडी (डीवीएल)

"डॉक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( चर्म विज्ञान रजित और कुष्ठ रोग विज्ञान ) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह कटिहार मेडिकल कॉलेज , कटिहार , बिहार में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में बी. एन. मंडल विश्वविद्यालय , बिहार , द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )

(ख) " दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

(डीडीवीएल)

" ( चर्म विज्ञान , रजित और कुष्ठ रोग विज्ञान मेंडिप्लोमा) "

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह लेडी हौंडग मेडिकल कालेज , नई दिल्ली में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)

(ग) " सौराष्ट्र विश्वविद्यालय गुजरात " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

डीपीएम

" मनोविज्ञान चिकित्सा में डिप्लोमा "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह पंडित दीनदयाल उपाध्याय मेडिकल कालेज, राजकोट , गुजरात में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में सौराष्ट्र विश्वविद्यालय , गुजरात द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई हो)

(घ) " कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय केरल " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित अभिष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमडी ( फार्माकोलॉजी )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (फार्माकोलॉजी) "

(यह मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह कालीकट मेडिकल कालेज , कालीकट , केरल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में कालीकट विश्वविद्यालय , केरल द्वारा वर्ष 1975 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो) 8543 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

(ड. ) " मैसूर विश्वविद्यालय कर्नाटक " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमडी (न्यायिक चिकित्सा)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (न्यायिक चिकित्सा) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह राजकीय मेडिकल कालेज , मैसूर , कर्नाटक में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में मैसूर विश्वविद्यालय कर्नाटक द्वारा वर्ष , 1994 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )

(च) " महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय नासिक " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमडी ( संवेदनाहरण )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (संवेदनाहरण ) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह एनकेपी साल्वे आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , नागपुर , महाराष्ट्र में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में महाराष्ट्र स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय नासिक द्वारा वर्ष 2 , जुलाई , 2010 में अथवा उसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई हो )

( छ ) " पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमएस ( ईएनटी)

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( ऑख , नाक तथा गला)

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह पांडिचेरी आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , पांडिचेरी , में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा वर्ष मार्च , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)

एमएस ( जनरल सर्जरी )

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( जनरल सर्जरी ) "

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह पांडिचेरी आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , पांडिचेरी में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा वर्ष मार्च , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो )

एमएस ( बाल रोग विज्ञान )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( बाल रोग विज्ञान ) "

(यह मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह पांडिचेरी आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान , पांडिचेरी में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पांडिचेरी विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा वर्ष मार्च , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो)

( ज ) " श्री बालाजी विद्यापीठ विश्वविद्यालय पांडिचेरी " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टि अंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

एमडी ( रेडियो डायग्नोसिस )

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन रेडियो डायग्नोसिस ) "

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह महात्मा गांधी मेडिकल कॉलेज तथा अनुसंधान संस्थान पांडिचेरी में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में श्री बालाजी विद्यापीठ विश्वविद्यालय पांडिचेरी द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात प्रदान की गई हो ) 8544

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

( झ ) " दी तमिलनाडु डा. एमजीआर मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय , चेन्नई " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टिअंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंत :स्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

डीओ

" नेत्र विज्ञान में डिप्लोमा "

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह पीएसजी आयुर्विज्ञान तथा अनुसंधान संस्थान , कोयम्बटूर , तमिलनाडु में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में दी तमिलनाडु एमजीआर , मेडिकल विश्वविद्यालय , चेन्नई द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) । ( ण ) " पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता " के समक्ष शीर्षक ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत शीर्षक ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] के अंतर्गत प्रविष्टिअंतिम एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , अर्थात्:-

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी

एमएस ( नेत्र रोग विज्ञान )

(नेत्र रोग विज्ञान ) "

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह आर. जी. कार मेडिकल कालेज कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय कोलकाता द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

एम (डीवीएल)

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( चर्म रोग , रतिज रोग तथा कुष्ठ रोग विज्ञान ) "

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह आर . जी. कार मेडिकल कालेज कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय कोलकाता द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

एमएस ( ईएनटी )

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी ( कान ,नाक और गला ) "

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह कमांड अस्पताल , कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय कोलकाता द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) । " मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी

एमएस ( जनरल सर्जरी )

(जनरल सर्जरी ) "

(यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह कमांड अस्पताल कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय कोलकाता द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

एमडी (मनोविज्ञान)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन

(मनोविज्ञान ) "

( यह एक मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह कमांड अस्पताल कोलकाता , पश्चिम बंगाल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के संबंध में पश्चिम बंगाल स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , कोलकाता द्वारा वर्ष अप्रैल , 2011 में अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

[ फा. सं. यू. - 12012 / 40/2011 - एमई- ( पी -11 ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव सभी के लिए टिप्पणीः

1. स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम को प्रदान की गई ऐसी मान्यता की अधिकतम अवधि 5 वर्षों के लिए होगी जिसके उपरान्त इसका नवीकरण कराना होगा ।

2. उप खंड 4 में यथा अपेक्षित मान्यता को समय पर नवीकरण करवाने में असफल होने के परिणामस्वरूप संबंधित स्नातकोत्तर पाठयक्रम में प्रवेश अनिवार्य रूप से बंद हो जाएंगे । 8545 [भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

(Department of Health and FamilyWelfare)

New Delhi, the 14th October , 2011

S.O. 3339.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government, after consulting the Medical Council of India hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

In the said Schedule:-

( a) against " B.N. Mandal University, Bihar " under ine heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' (hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely:-

MD(DVL)

"Doctor ofMedicine Dermatology, Venerology & Leprosy "

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by B.N. Mandal University, Bihar in respect of students being trained at Katihar Medical College, Katihar, Bihar on or afterApril , 2011) .

(b) against " University of Delhi " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration' ( hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

(DDVL)

" Diploma in Dermatology, Venerology & Leprosy "

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by University of Delhi in respect of students being trained at Lady Hardinge Medical College , New Delhi on or afer April , 2011).

(c) against " Saurashtra University Gujarat " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely:-----

DPM

"Diploma in Psychological Medicine"

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification whengranted by Saurashtra University Gujarat in respect of students being trained at Pt . Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College , Rajkot, Gujarat on or afterApril , 2011 ) .

(d) against "Calicut University Kerala " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

"Doctor of Medicine (Pharmacology) "

MD( Pharmacology) (Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Calicut University Kerala in respect of students being trained at Calicut Medical College Calicut , Kerala on or after 1975) .

(e) against "Mysore University Karnataka " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

8546

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

"Doctor ofMedicine (Forensic Medicine) "

MD (Forensic Medicine) (This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Mysore University Karnataka in respect of students being trained at Govt . MedicalCollege Mysore , Karnataka on or after1994).

(f) against "Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Nashik " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ) the following shall be inserted namely:-

MD (Anaesthesia )

"Doctor ofMedicine (Anaesthesia)"

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Nashik in respect of students being trained at NKP Salve Institute ofMedical Sciences , Nagpur Maharashtra on or after 2-7-2010) .

(g) against " Pondicherry University " under the heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification ' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration' [hereinafter referred to as column (3) ] the following shall be inserted namely:-

MS (ENT)

"Master of Surgery (Ear, Nose & Throat) "

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Pondicherry University in respect of students being trained at Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences , Pondicherry on or after March , 2011 ) .

MS(General Surgery)

"Master of Surgery (General Surgery) "

"Doctor ofMedicine

MD (Paediatrics)

(Paediatrics)

(h) against " Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Pondicherry " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation ' for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely:--

MD ( Radio Diagnosis)

" Doctor ofMedicine (Radio Diagnosis ) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, Pondicherry in respect of students being trained at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute , Pondicherry on orafterApril , 2011) .

8547 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

(i ) against " The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai " under the heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification ' (hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading Abbreviation for Registration ' [hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

"Diploma in Ophthalmology "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai in respect of students being trained at PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research , Coimbatore Tamil Nadu or after April , 2011 ) .

(f) against " The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences , Kolkata " under the heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification ' [hereinafter referred to as column (2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely: --

MS ( Ophthalmology)

"Master of Surgery (Ophthalmology) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences , Kolkata , in respect of students being trained at R.G. Kar. Medical College, Kolkata , West Bengal on or after April , 2011).

MD(DVL)

"Doctor ofMedicine (Dermatology, Venerology & Leprosy) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences Kolkata , in respect of students being trained at R.G Kar. Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal on or after April , 2011 ) .

MS ( ENT)

"Master of Surgery (Ear, Nose & Throat) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences , Kolkata , in respect of students being trained at Command Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal on or after April , 2011 ) .

MS (General Surgery )

"Master of Surgery (General Surgery) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences , Kolkata, in respect of students being trained at Command Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal on or after April , 2011 ) .

MS ( Psychiatry )

"Doctor ofMedicine (Psychiatry ) "

(Thisshall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by The West Bengal University, of Health Sciences , Kolkata , in respect of students being trained at Command Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal on or after April , 2011) .

[F. No.U - 12012/40/2011 - ME ( P- II ) ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

Note to all : 1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years upon which itshall have to be renewed .

2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub - clause - 4 shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course .

4182G1 /11-2 8548

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 14 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3340 केन्दीय सरकार , भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद अधिनियम , 1956 ( 1956 का 102 ) की धारा 11 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद उक्त अधिनियम की प्रथम अनुसूची में निम्नलिखित और संशोधन करती है , अर्थात्ः-

उक्त अनुसूची में

( क ) " डॉ. एन.टी.आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा " के समक्ष ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत और ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , नामतः-

एमडी ( डीवीएल)

" डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन ( डर्मेटोलोजी वीनीरियोलोजी एण्ड लेप्रोसी ) "

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह अलुरी सीतारामा राजू आयुर्विज्ञान अकादमी , इलुरू , आंध्र प्रदेश में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के बारे में डा. एन.टी.आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा द्वारा नवम्बर , 2010 में या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

( ख ) " कुन्नूर विश्वविद्यालय " के समक्ष ' मान्यता प्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत और ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण और [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतः स्थापित किया जाएगा , नामतः-

एमएस ( इएनटी)

" मास्टर ऑफ सर्जरी (इएनटी)

( यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह आयुर्विज्ञान अकादमी कुन्नूर केरल में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के बारे में कुन्नूर विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा मार्च , 2011 में या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो ) (ग ) " परवारा आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( मानद विश्वविद्यालय ) लोनी महाराष्ट्र " के समक्ष मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता ' [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 2 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत और ' पंजीकरण के लिए संक्षेपण , [ इसके बाद कॉलम ( 3 ) के रूप में संदर्भित ] शीर्षक के अंतर्गत अंतिम प्रविष्टि एवं उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि के बाद निम्नलिखित अंतःस्थापित किया जाएगा , नामत :-

एमडी ( रेडियो थेरेपी )

"डाक्टर ऑफ मेडिसिन (रेडियो थेरेपी ) "

(यह एक मान्यताप्राप्त चिकित्सा अर्हता होगी जब यह ग्रामीण चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय लोनी महाराष्ट्र में प्रशिक्षित किए जा रहे विद्यार्थियों के बारे में परवारा आयुर्विज्ञान संस्थान ( मानद विश्वविद्यालय ) लोनी महाराष्ट्र द्वारा दिसम्बर, 2010 में या उसके बाद प्रदान की गई हो )

[फा. सं. यू-12012/ 33 / 2011 - एमई- ( पी- II ) ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव सभी के लिए नोट :

1. स्नातकोत्तर पाठयक्रम को इस प्रकार प्रदान की गई मान्यता अधिकतम 5 वर्ष की अवधि के लिए होगी जिसके बाद उसे नवीकृत किया जाना होगा ।

2. उप खंड 4 में यथा अपेक्षित मान्यता का समय पर नवीकरण नहीं किए जाने पर संबंधित स्नातकोत्तर पाठ्यक्रम में नामांकन को निरपवाद रूपसे बंद कर दिया जाएगा । 8549 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 14th October, 2011

S.O. 3340.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act , 1956 ( 102 of 1956) , the Central Government , after consulting the Medical Council of India hereby, makes the following further amendments in the First Schedule to the said Act , namely : ---

In the said Schedule

(a) against " Dr. NTR University, of Health Sciences , Vijayawada " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification ' [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading 'Abbreviation for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column (3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

MD (DVL)

" Doctor of Medicine ( Dermatology , Venerology & Leprosy"

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences , Vijayawada in respect of students being trained at Alluri Sitarama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences , Eluru , Andhra Prades on orafter November 2010. )

(b ) against " Kannur University " under the heading ' Recognized Medical Qualification' ( hereinafter referred to as column (2) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation for Registration ' [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely :-

MS ( ENT)

"Master of Surgery ( ENT) "

(This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Kannur University in respect of students being trained at Academy of Medical Sciences , Kannur , Kerala on or after March 2011. )

( c) against " Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed University ) Loni , Maharashtra " under the heading 'Recognized Medical Qualification ' ( hereinafter referred to as column ( 2 ) ] , after the last entry and entry relating thereto under the heading ' Abbreviation ' for Registration [ hereinafter referred to as column ( 3 ) ] the following shall be inserted namely:-

MD ( Radio Therapy )

" Doctor ofMedicine (Radio Therapy) "

( This shall be a recognized medical qualification when granted by Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed University ) Loni Maharashtra in respect of students being trained at Rural Medical College , Loni Maharashtra on or after December 2010. )

[ F. No.U - 12012 / 33 / 2011 - ME ( P - II ) ]

ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

Note to all:

1. The recognition so granted to a Postgraduate Course shall be for a maximum period of 5 years upon which it sh have to be renewed.

2. Failure to seek timely renewal of recognition as required in sub- clause - 4 shall invariably result in stoppage of admissions to the concerned Postgraduate Course .

8550

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर, 2011

का.आ. 3341.-केंद्र सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948. का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करके उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में एतद्वारा निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

उक्त अनुसूची में-

2. चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ द्वारा प्रदान की जा रही दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता के बारे में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 56 के समक्ष कालम 2 तथा 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी , नामतः-

" VII. स्कूल ऑफ डेंटल साइंसेज , ग्रेटर नोएडा

(i ) बैचलर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी

बीडीएस , चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ " (यदिदिनांक 26-3-2011 को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गईं हो)

[फा. सं.. वी -12017/93/2005 -डीई ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th , October , 2011

S.O. 3341. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- Section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act, namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 & 3 against Serial No. 56, in Part- I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Ch . Charan Singh University, Meerut, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder : --

"VII . School of Dental Sciences ,

Greater Noida .

(i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery

BDS , Ch . Charan Singh University, Meerut" (ifgranted on or after 26-3-2011 )

[F. No. V- 12017/93 /2005 -DE] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3342. केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् एतदद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. जम्मूविश्वविद्यालय , द्वारा प्रदान की जाने वाली दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 95 के सामने कॉलम 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियाँ इसके अन्तर्गत अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी: -

" 1. इंदिरा गांधी गवर्नमेंट डेंटल कालेज , जम्मू

(i ) बैचलर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी

बीडीएस , जम्मूविश्वविद्यालय " ( यदि शैक्षणिक सत्र 2004-05 , 2005-06, 2006-07 के दौरान बीडीएस पाठ्यक्रम में दाखिला लिए बैचों को केवल एक बारगी उपाय के रूप में प्रदान किया गया हो , इसे भविष्य में दृष्टांत के रूप में कोट नहीं किया जाएगा ) ।

[फा. सं. वी-12017/ 14/2004-डीई ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव 8551 [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 19th October , 2011

S.O. 3342. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government , after consultation with the Dental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 95 , in Part - I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by University of Jammu , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :

" I. Indira Gandhi Government Dental College Jammu .

( i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery

BDS , University of Jammu " (if granted to the batches admitted in BDS Course during the academic sessions 2004-05 , 2005-06 , 2006-07 only as a one time measure , not to be quoted as precedent in future)

[F. No. V- 12017 / 14/2004- DE ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 19 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3343.-केंद्र सरकार , दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. चौ . चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ द्वारा प्रदान की गई दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता से संबंधित दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसूची के भाग-1 क्रम संख्या 56 के सामने कालम 2 एवं 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी , नामत: -

" VIII . इन्द्रप्रस्थ दंत चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय एवं अस्पताल , गाजियाबाद

बीडीएस, चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ" (i ) बैचलर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी

( यदि दिनांक 22-3-2011 को या उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

[फा. सं. वी -12017 / 52 /2005 - डीई ]

अनिता त्रिपाठी , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 19th , October , 2011

S.O. 3343. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (2 ) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India , hereby, makes the following amendments in Part- I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 56 , in Part I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Ch . Charan Singh University , Meerut , the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

"VIII . Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital , Ghaziabad .

BDS , Ch . Charan Singh University , Meerut " ( i ) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 22-3-2011 )

[F. No. V- 12017 / 52 /2005 - DE ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

8552

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 19 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3344. केंद्रीय सरकार , दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप - धारा ( 2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के पश्चात्, एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है , नामतः

2. चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ द्वारा प्रदान की जाने वाली दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता के संबंध में दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम, 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 56 के सामने कालम 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां इसके अंतर्गत अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी:-

"VI . आई टी एस डेंटल कालेज हास्पीटल एवं रिसर्च सेंटर , ग्रेटर नोएडा

बीडीएस, चौ . चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय , मेरठ " (i ) बैचलर ऑफ डेंटल सर्जरी ( यदि दिनांक 9-3-2011 को अथवा उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

[फा. सं. वी-12017/66/2003 -डीई ] अनिता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th October , 2011

S.O. 3344. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948 ) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments inPart I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries of column 2 and 3 against Serial No. 56 , in Part I of the Schedule to the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition of dental degrees awarded by Ch . Charan Singh University, Meerut , the following entries shall be inserted the reunder :-

BDS, Ch . Charan Singh University, Meerut " "VI . ITS Dental College , Hospital and Research Centre , Greater Noida . (i) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (ifgranted on or after 9-3-2011 )

[F. No. V- 12017/ 66/2005 -DE ] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 19 अक्तूबर , 2011

का.आ. 3345.-केंद्रीय सरकार दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की धारा 10 की उप- धारा (2 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, भारतीय दंत चिकित्सा परिषद् से परामर्श करने के बाद , एतद्वारा उक्त अधिनियम की अनुसची के भाग -1 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है, नामतः

2. ममता दंत चिकित्सा महाविद्यालय , खम्मम , आन्ध्र प्रदेश के बारे में जो डॉ. एन. टी. आर. स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा द्वारा प्रदान की गई दंत चिकित्सा डिग्रियों की मान्यता से संबंधित दंत चिकित्सक अधिनियम , 1948 ( 1948 का 16 ) की अनुसची के भाग -1 में क्रम संख्या 50 VI के सामने कालम 2 और 3 की मौजूदा प्रविष्टियों में निम्नलिखित प्रविष्टियां अन्तःस्थापित की जाएंगी नामतः

एमडीएस , ( पेडो) , डॉ. एन.टी.आर.

" VI . पेडोडोन्टिक्स एण्ड प्रिवेन्टिव डेन्टिस्ट्री (यदि दिनांक 21-4-2011 को या उसके पश्चात् प्रदान की गई हो ) ।

स्वास्थ्यविज्ञान विश्वविद्यालय , विजयवाड़ा"

[फा. सं. वी-12017/51/2006-डीई ] अनिता त्रिपाठी, अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 19th October , 2011

S.O. 3345. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 2) of Section 10 of the Dentists Act , 1948 ( 16 of 1948) , the Central Government, after consultation with the Dental Council of India, hereby, makes the following amendments in Part I of the Schedule to the said Act , namely :-

2. In the existing entries ofcolumn 2 and 3 against VI of Serial No. 50, in respect of Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, in Part - I ofthe Schedule to the Dentists Act, 1948 ( 16 of 1948) pertaining to recognition ofdental degrees awarded by Dr. N.T.R. University ofHealth Sciences, Vijayawada, the following entries shall be inserted thereunder :-

"VI . Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ifgranted on or after 21-4-2011 )

MDS ( Paedo . ) , Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences , Vijayawada "

[F. No. V- 12017/51 /2006-DE] ANITA TRIPATHI , Under Secy.

8553 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

उपभोक्ता मामले , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय

( उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग )

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3346.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स पॉल सिस्टम , शांति कुंज , उदयपुरी चौपटा , पीरू मदार , तह. राम नगर , जिला नैनीताल ( उत्तराखंड ) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले ' पीपीएस ' श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " पॉल " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 545 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है;

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 200 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1000 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Stampingplate

Stampinghate

AtomoftheplatformState140

indicatorofthePlatformScale,

PAL आकृति- 2 - मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुडे हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि. ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 * या 5x10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 321 )/ 2010 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 8554

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS , FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

(Department of Consumer Affairs )

New Delhi , the 16th September , 2011

S.O. 3346. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7 ) and .( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with digital indication of high Accuracy (Accuracy Class - 11 ) of Series " PPS " and with brand name " PAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfacturedby M / s . Paul System , Shanti Kunj , Udaipuri Chopra , Peeru Madara , Tah . Rám Nagar , Distt - Nainital ( Uttarakhand ) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10/ 545 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type ) with a maximum capacity of 200 kg . and minimum capacity of 1000g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

saal

Stampingdate

StansingPhatu

IndicatorofthePlatformScare,

India'softheplatformSeat

PAL Figure- 2-Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display , than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A / D card / mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto 5000kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 (321 ) /2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology .

8555 [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 3347.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम, 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब, केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्रीनाथ इंजीनियरस , 165 ए, वीर सावरकर नगर, रंगबाड़ी रोड, कोटा, राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएनई टीटी-30 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (टेबलटाइप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सफारी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 10/24 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टोप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SEALWIRE

LEADSQUARE SEAL

BOTTOMOFSCALE

TOPROD:CFSALE

0000.

READSQUARE STALL

TRAL WIRE

आकृति-2-मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

कपटपूर्ण व्यवहार के लिए वेइंग मशीन को खोले जाने से रोकने के लिए सीलिंग की जाती है । बाटम प्लेट और साइड प्लेट में दो छेदों करके और इनमें से ट्विस्ड सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर लीड से सील किया जाता है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप-वारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्ग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि. ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 % , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 23 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182GI/ 11-3 8556

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[ PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 16th September , 2011

S.O. 3347. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of Series " SNE TT- 30 " and with brand name " Safari " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , maunfacturedby M/ s . Srinath Engineers , 165A , Veer Savarker Nager, Rangbari Road , Kota Rajasthan which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 10 / 24 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type ) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- I

Figure- 2-- Schematic Diagram of the sealing provision of the model .

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Twisted sealing wire passes through the holes of bottom plate , sidecover and stamping plate with lead seal for stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 100 to 10000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . more and with ' e ' value 1x10 , 2x10 or 5x10k , where k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle . design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 23 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 8557 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3348.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स श्रीनाथ इंजीनियरस , 165 ए , वीर सावरकर नगर , रंगबाड़ी रोड, कोटा , राजस्थान द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसएनई पीटी -17 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सफारी " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 25 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

31erside seating

PLATFORM SCALE

veable sealing Scherzale Biagram Df Platten Model

DICATOR HEAD

Stamping Flai site réaling

STAND

PLATFORN

WEIGHING

SALADI

आकृति-2 -मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 23 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8558

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3348. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - III ) of Series " SNE PT- 17 " and with brand name " Safari " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , maunfacturedby M/ s . Srinath Engineers , 165A, Veer Savarker Nager , Rangbari Road , Kota Rajasthan which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10/25;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g. It has a tare device with a 100 percent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts and 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Heaple staling

PLATFORM SCALE

3. side seating

DICTOR HEAD

Stammbing Piaz sldesealing

STAMA

WEIGHING PLATFORN

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram ofthe sealing provision of the model .

Sealing shall be done to prevent opening of the weighing machine for fraudulent practice . Twisted sealing wire passes through the holes of bottora plate , sidecover and stamping plate with lead seal for stamping . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub -section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval ofthe said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . up to 5000kg , with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value 1x10k, 2x10k or 5x10k, where k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM-21 (23 )/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8559 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3349.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस आर इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , प्लाट नं. 73 , आदर्श नगर , सदगुरु सोसायटी , हडकेश्वर रोड , पिपला , नागपुर -34 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एसएसपी -13 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सनसुइमैक्स " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 113 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण- पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SANKA MAX

आकृति- 2 - मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

स्केल की बाडी के होल्ज , जो बाटम प्लेट और टॉप कवर में है , से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण- पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो । मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 92 ) / 2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8560

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANΑ 5 , 1933 [ PART II-SEC . 3 ( i ) ]

New Delhi , the 16th September , 2011

S.O. 3349 .-- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby approves and issues the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy Class - II ) of Series " SSP - 13 " and with brand name " SANSUIMAX " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfacturedby M/ s . S. R. Electronics , Plot No. - 73 , Adarsh Nagar , Sadguru Society, Hudkeshwar Road , Pipla , Nagpur - 34 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 10/113;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

SANEETMUL

Figure- 2--Sealing Diagram .

Sealing is done by passing sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes made in the bottom plate and top cover . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 50000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50 mg . and with number of verification scale interval ( n ) in the range of 5000 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value 1 × 10,2 × 10k or 5 × 10 , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and materials with which , the approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 92 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 8561 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3350.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एस आर इलेक्ट्रोनिक्स , प्लाट नं. 73 , आदर्श नगर , सदगुरु सोसायटी , हडकेश्वर रोड , पिपला , नागपुर -34 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसपीपी -7 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " सनसुइमैक्स " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10/ 114 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

OTHER SIDE

SEALING

MAN WIT

SAMPIN

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

स्केल की बाडी के होल्स , जो बाटम प्लेट और टॉप कवर में हैं , से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 92 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8562

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ] New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3350. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby approves and issues the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " SPP - 7 " and with brand name " SANSUIMAX " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M/ s . S. R. Electronics , Plot No. 73 , Adarsh Nagar , Sadguru Society, Hudkeshwar Road , Pipla , Nagpur - 34 which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/ 114;

Thesaid model is a strain gauge type load cell based non -automatic weighing instrument ( Platform type) with amaximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing resul . Theinstrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

OTHERER SIDE SEALING

SEAL WITH STAMPING PLATE

PLATFOR

FRONT

Figure - 2 Sealing diagram .

The sealing is done passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes made in the bottom plate and top cover. Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/motherboard to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilarmake, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . up to 5000 kg. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 (92)/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8563 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3351.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स प्रिसिजन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स इंस्ट्रूमेंट कं. , 77 , स्वर्ण पार्क, मुंडका , दिल्ली -110041 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले "जीटीडब्ल्यू- ए " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रानिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " गोल्डटैक " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10/ 103 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन और न्यूनतम क्षमता 250 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-3 मॉडल के इंडीकेटर का सीलिंग प्रावधान

बायीं तरफ दिए गए दो हैड होल्स में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल के सीलिंग प्रावधान का स्कीमवार डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है । उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 50,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के , या 5 × 10 कं , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 89 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182 Gi / 11-4 8564

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3351. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the saidAct , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class -II ) of Series " GTW- A " and with brand name " GOLDTECH " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model) , maunfactured by M/s. Precision Electronic Instruments Co. , 77 , Swaran Park , Mundka , Delhi - 110041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 103 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge) with a maximum capacity of 60 tonne and minimum capacity of 250 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5kg . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) , Display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model( Weighbridge)

Head hele screw Figure- 3 : Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire through the two head holes in the left side . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and upto 200 tonne. with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 50,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1 ×10k, 2×10 * or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM-21 (89)/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8565 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3352.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए के एन इंडस्ट्रिज बालाजी स्क्वेयर , यावतमल -445001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एनआईटी-11 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निमसन " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /10/ 548 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MAN

MAL

888888

आकृति -2 : उपकरण के मॉडल का सीलिंग प्रावधान

स्केल की बाडी के होल्स में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ऊपर दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10m , 5x10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 327 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8566

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] NewDelhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3352. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ofMedium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " NIT- 11 " and with brand name " NIMSON" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M/s. AKN Industries , Balaji Square , Yavatmal-445001 ( Maharasthra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/548;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with amaximum capacity of30kg. and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

MANS

STAMPINI PLATS SHE SEALIN

Figure- 2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instrument of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . and with number of verification scale interval (n) inthe range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero . manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured.

[F. No.WM- 21 (327)/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8567 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3353.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप- धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एकेएन इंडस्ट्रीज बालाजी स्क्वेयर , यावतमल -445001 ( महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एनआईजे -13 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलम उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निमसन " है, ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 10/ 549 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयंतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

MANS

STAMPING PLATI KIE SEALING : LOAD SEAI

OFF

888888

ON OF TARE NIMSON

LE RO

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

स्केल की बाडी के छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि. ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10* , या 5x10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 327 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8568

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [ PART II- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 16th September , 2011

S.O. 3353. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of High Accuracy ( Accuracy class -II ) of Series " NIJ - 13 " and with brand name " NIMSON " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . AKN Industries , Balaji Square , Yavatmal- 445001 ( Maharasthra ) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 549 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval (e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

MAN

ONOFF

ON OFF

888888

TARL

NIMSON

Figure - 2 Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration.

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make, and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of Img to 50mg and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10 or 5x10k , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 327) / 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8569 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3354.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप- धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ए के एन इंडस्ट्रीज बालाजी स्क्वेयर , यावतमाल -445001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एनआईपी -7 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निमसन " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई. एन डी/09 / 10/ 550 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म प्रकार ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SEALING

SAL WHH AMPING MATE

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी के छेदों से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 मि.ग्रा . तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधि क के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 327 ) /2010 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8570

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3354. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7 ) and (8) of Section 36 of the saidAct, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Platform type ) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of Series " NIP- 7 " and with brand name " NIMSON " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M/ s . AKN Industries Balaji Square , Yavatmal-445001 ( Maharasthra) which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10/550;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of 1000kg . and minimum capacity of2kg . The verification scale interval (e ) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1Model

SHALING

SAL WITH LAMPING PLATE

Figure- 2Schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the scale through holes . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

Theinstrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg. upto 5000kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg to 2g and with number ofverification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k, 2x10 or 5x10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM -21 ( 327)/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8571 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3355.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स एकेएन इंडस्ट्रीज बालाजी स्क्वेयर, यावतमाल -445011 ( महाराष्ट्र) द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एनआईडब्ल्यू-5 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रानिक वेब्रिज ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " निमसन " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/ 551 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( इलेक्ट्रानिक वेब्रिज ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 50 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत-प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

FRONT VIEW

NIMSON

SAMBING

SIDEAMALING

8442

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

डिस्पले की बाडी में छेदों से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सीलिंग की जाती है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10के 5x10 *, के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 ( 327 )/2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182GI/ 11-5 8572

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3355. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7 ) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III) of Series " NIW- 5 " and with brand name " NIMSON" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M / s . AKN Industries Balaji Square, Yavatmal-445001 ( Maharasthra) and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10/551 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge ) with a maximum capacity of 50tonne and minimum capacity of 100 kg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model(Weighbridge )

FRONT VIEW

NIMSON

Figure-3 Sealing provision of the indicator of the model

Sealing is done by passing the sealing wire from the body of the indicator scale through holes. A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub- section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonnes and upto 200tonne with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with number of verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10k or 5x10k , k being the positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the said manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 327) /2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8573 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 16 सितम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 3356.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वराडे आटोमेशन सोल्यूशन प्रा. लि. , धाडगे एस्टेट , सर्वे नं. 14 , नान्देड विलेज , सिंगाड रोड , पुणे -411041 द्वारा विनिर्मित यथार्थता वर्ग रेफ . X ( 1 ) के ' आई डब्ल्यू' श्रृंखला के स्वचालित कैच वेइंग उपकरण ( चैक व्हीयर ) जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ओप्टी वे " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10/ 05 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित स्वचालित स्वचालित कैच वेइंग उपकरण तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 5 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 30 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 0.50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड़ क्रिस्टल प्रदर्श ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SHAJ , WITH STAMPING 411

OTHER SHOE SEALING

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

स्पेशल स्क्रू पर दिए गए होल और बॉडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर वायर के अंत में लीड लगाई जाती है जैसा की ऊपर रेखाचित्र में दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुशार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 11 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8574

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 16th September, 2011

S.O. 3356. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections ( 7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the Model of Automatic Catch Weighing Instrument ( Check Weigher ) belonging to accuracy class , Ref X ( 1 ) of ' IW' series with brand name " Opti Weigh" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , maunfactured by M/ s Warade Automation Solutions Pvt . Ltd. Dhadge Estate , Survey No. 14, Nanded Village , Sinhgad Road , Pune -411041 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 10/ 05 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based Automatic Catch Weighing Instrument . It has maximum capacity of 5kg . and minimum capacity of 30g . and verification scale interval (e ) is 0.50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Diode ( LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

SEAL WEI STAMPINY 411

OTHER SIHOL SEALING

Figure- 2 Sealing diagram of the sealing provision of the model

A sealing wire is passed though the body & hole provided at the special screw and a lead seal is applied at the end of this wire sketch as given below.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares thee this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg. and with the number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g and with number of verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10 * or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 11 ) /2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8575 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3357.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंडस वेइंग सिस्टम प्रा. लि. , 14/10 - एफ , सितरा - कलपट्टी रोड , कलपट्टी - पोस्ट , कोयम्बतूर -641048 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग 1 ) वाले " आईडब्ल्यू- एएन " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इंडस " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 10 / 525 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसिपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित ( टेबलटाप प्रकार ) तोलन उपकरण है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 310 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 मि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 1 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

"A "

VIE W

"B आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी मे से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्प्ले पर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्प्ले की बेस प्लेट और टाप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुँच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. या इससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50,000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधि कतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , या 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 313 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8576

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 19th September , 2011

S.O. 3357. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and ( 8) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument( Tabletop type) with digital indication of Special Accuracy (Accuracy class -I) of Series " IW- AN " and with brand name " INDUS" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Indus Weighing Systems Pvt . Ltd. , 14/ 10 - F, Sitra - Kalapatty Road, Kalapatty- Post, Coimbatore - 641048 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 10/525;

The said model is a Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with a maximum capacity of310g . and minimum capacity of 100mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 1mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD) indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Model

Figure- 2Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12 ) of section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilarmake, accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of50,000 or more ' e ' value of Img or more and with ' e' value of 1x10k, 2x10k or 5x10k , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which, the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F.No.WM- 21 ( 313 )/2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8577 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3358.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंडस वेइंग सिस्टम प्रा. लि. 14/ 10 - एफ , सितरा - कलप‌ट्टी रोड , कलपट्टी- पोस्ट , कोयम्बतूर -641048 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आईडब्ल्यू डब्ल्यूबी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज मल्टी लोड सैल टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इंडस " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10/ 526 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित ( इलेक्ट्रोनिक वेब्रिज मल्टी लोड सैल टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 60 टन है और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 कि.ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 कि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

INSTALED IN : M/S. CHANDRAN'S POULTRY FORMS, PULIYAMPATTI ( PO) , PALLADAM .

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाड़ी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टाप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भीदिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 1 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 5 टन से 200 टन तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 या 5x10 के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 313 )/2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8578

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 19th September, 2011

S.O. 3358. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, issatisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act , 1976 ( 60 of 1976 ) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Approval of Models ) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - sections (7) and (8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Electronic Weighbridge Multi Load Cell Type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( Accuracy class- III) of Series " IW- WB " and with brand name " INDUS " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Indus Weighing Systems Pvt . Ltd. , 14/ 10 - F, Sitra - Kalapatty Road , Kalapatty - Post , Coimbatore - 641048 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09/ 10/ 526;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Electronic Weighbridge Multi Load Cell Type) with a maximum capacity of 60 tonne and minimum capacity of 400kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 200kg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) Display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

1000000

INSTALED IN : M/S. CHANDRAN'S POULTRY FORMS, PULIYAMPATTI ( PO) , PALLADAM .

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the right side/back side of the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate & top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board todisable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 5 tonne and up to 200 tonne with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or above and with ' e ' value of 1x10 * , 2x10 or 5x10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No.WM - 21 ( 313 )/2010]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8579 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 19 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3359.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) बाट और माप मानक अधिनियम , 1976 ( 1976 का 60 ) तथा बाट और माप मानक (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 1987 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप हैं और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) और उप - धारा ( 8 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स इंडस वेइंग सिस्टम प्रा. लि. , # 14/ 10 - एफ , सितरा - कलपट्टी रोड, कलपट्टी - पोस्ट, कोयम्बतूर -641048 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " आईडब्ल्यू- एचएस " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग स्केल टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " इंडस " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 10 / 527 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( हैंगिंग स्केल ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 100 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMIOR HANGING AMV HENGLANN HI WHS STRES

BRAND NAM INDUS FRONT VIL-W

St VII-W

FOINI

0000

STAMPING

SFALING

IW- HS-SERIES

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की गई है । डिस्पले की बेस प्लेट और टाप कवर के छेद से सील को जोड़ा गया है , तब सील वायर इन दोनों छेदों में से निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में केलिब्रेशन के लिए बाहरी पहुंच है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड / मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 36 की उप - धारा ( 12 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 1 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 1000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 % , 5x10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम-21 (313 ) /2010 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक, विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182 GI / 11-6 8580

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3( i ) ]

New Delhi , the 19th September, 2011

S.O. 3359.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) and the Standards of Weights and Measures ( Approval of Models) Rules , 1987 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections (7) and ( 8 ) of Section 36 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non -automatic weighing instrument (Hanging Scale) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of series " IW -HS " and with brand name " INDUS " (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Indus Weighing Systems Pvt . Ltd. , # 14/ 10- F, Sitra- Kalapatty Road, Kalapatty -Post, Coimbatore- 641048 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/10/ 527;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Hanging Scale) with amaximum capacity of 100 kg . and minimum capacity of400g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

5. IN MARRJAGRAMIORHANGING MAHINATASS FRONT VILAW

BRAND NAM INDUS

SIDE VILW

SLALING POINT

CLAMPIN

STAMPING PLATF

MALI PUINE

SIALING KAN

じ

IW - HS- SERIES

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed throught these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - section ( 12) of Section 36 of the said Act , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments ofsimilar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 1000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 2g . and verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value 5g or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM - 21 (313 )/ 2010 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8581 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 सितम्बर 2011

का.आ. 3360.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स महावीर इंटरप्राइजिज , काबेरी बाजार , कक्कड़ गंज , सहारनपुर, उत्तर प्रदेश -247001 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एमईटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाहप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जेएनडी " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 /340 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 2 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जाड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे । मि.ग्रा . से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 % , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 158 ) /2011 ] बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8582

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th September , 2011

S.O. 3360.- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule ( 4) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Table top type ) with digital indication of high accuracy ( accuracy class -II ) of Series " MET " and with brand name "JND " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Mahavir Enterprises , Kabri Bazar , Kakkar Ganj , Saharanpur , Uttar Pradesh - 247001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09/ 11/ 340 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display ( LCD ) indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure - 2-- Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display , then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . Adip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 1 mg . to 50 mg . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100 mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 * , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 158 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 8583 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 20 सितम्बर 2011

का.आ. 3361.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स महावीर इंटरप्राइजिज , काबरी बाजार , कक्कड़ गंज , सहारनपुर , उत्तर प्रदेश -247001 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एमईपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " जेएनडी" है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 11 / 341 समनुदेशित किया गया है, अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

TABLE TOP 111

Other side Sealing

Seat with Slamping Mate

Load Cell

Display

Tare : Zero

Other side Sealing

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 * , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 158 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8584

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th September, 2011

S.O.3361 . Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority , is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of Rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Plateform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (accuracy class -III ) of Series " MEP " and with brand name " JND " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M / s . Mahavir Enterprises , Kabri Bazar , Kakkar Ganj , Saharanpur , Uttar Pradesh - 247001 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11/341 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with maximum capacity of 150 kg . and minimum capacity of 400 g. The verification scale interval ( e ) is 20g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The light emitting diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

TABLE TOP III

Other side Sealing

load Cell

Seal with Stamping Plate

Display

On Off

Tare Zero

Other side

Sealing

Figure- 2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

The instrument has external control to calibration . A dip switch has also been provided in A / D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9 ) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and up to 5000 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1x10k , 2x10 or 5x10 *, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 158 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT , Director of Legal Metrology 8585 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 20 सितम्बर 2011

का.आ. 3362 , केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स वैल - कम इंस्ट्रूमेंट , ब्लाक नं. 18 , यमुना एस्टेट , विष्णु एस्टेट के पास , रघुनाथ स्कूल के सामने , मेमको - बापनगर रोड , अहमदाबाद -380025 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूआईटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वैल - कम " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 / 288 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी साम्रगी से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक, यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा . से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एम ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 % , 5x10 के, के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 147 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8586

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi , the 20th September , 2011

S.O. 3362.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub -rule (6) of Rule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofRule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (table top type) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy ( accuracy class -III ) of Series " WIT " and with brand name " WEL - COME" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Wel- Come Instruments , Block No. 18, Yamuna Estate, Near Vishnu Estate , Opposite Raghunath School , Memco -Bapnagar Road, Ahmedabad-380025, Gujurat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /288;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with a maximum capacity of 30 kg . and minimum capacity of 100 g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9) of Rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g: or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero, manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM- 21 ( 147)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8587 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 20 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3363.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्तरिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम, 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स त्रैल- कम इंस्ट्रूमेंट , ब्लाक नं. 18 , यमुना एस्टेट , विष्णु एस्टेट के पास , रघुनाथ स्कूल के सामने , मेमको - बापनगर रोड , अहमदाबाद -380025 , गुजरात द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " डब्ल्यूआईपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण (प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " वेल - कम " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 / 289 संमनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्तमॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 500 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 1 कि.ग्रा . है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 50 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एल ई डी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Stamping plate

0000

Lead seal

(Indicator of the Platform Scale -Front Side)

Stamping Plate

Lead seal

Sealingwire

(Indicator of the platform Scale-Lower back Side) अआकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और , केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1x10 , 2x10 , 5x10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 147 ) / 2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182GI /11-7 8588

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] New Delhi , the 20th September, 2011

S.O. 3363. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010) read with sub- rule (6) of Rule 8 and sub- rule (4) ofRule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy (Accuracy class -III ) of Series " WIP " and with brand name " WEL - COME" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Wel- Come Instruments , Block No. 18, Yamuna Estate, Near Vishnu Estate, Opposite Raghunath School , Memco-Bapnagar Road , Ahmedabad - 380025, Gujurat and which is assigned the approval mark IND/ 09 / 11 / 289;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type) with maximum capacity of500 kg . and minimum capacity of 1kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 50g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result. The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1

Stamping plate

Lead seal

(indicator of the Platform Scale-Front Sidej

Stamping Plate

Lead seal

Sealingwire

(Indicator of the platform Scale Lower back Side)

Figure-2-Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole inbase plate and top cover ofdisplay, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typica. schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. Adip switch has also been provided in A/D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9) ofRule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said Model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and upto5000 kg. with verification scale interval (n) in the range of500 to 10,000 for 'e' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved Model has been manufactured .

[F. No. WM- 21 ( 147)/ 2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8589 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 /अग्रहायण 5, 1933

नई दिल्ली , 20 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3364.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हाई- टैक सोल्यूशन , अपर शिवपुरी , कांके रोड , रांची , झारखण्ड द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- II ) वाले " एसजेटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " स्टार जोनसन " है , (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 /284 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 200 मि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि. ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति - 1

MAN

STAMPER CLA

ON-

888888

470

218

ANG

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड /मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या. उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2× 10 * , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 98 ) / 2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8590

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933 [PART II-SBC. 3 (ii) ]

NewDelhi , the 20th September , 2011

S.O. 3364. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report (see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- sections 22 of the Legal MetrologyAct, 2009 ( 1 of2010) readwith sub-rule (6) of rule 8 and sub-rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Table top type) with digital indication ofhigh accuracy (accuracy class - II) ofseries " SJT " and with brand name " STAR JONSON" (hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Hi - Tek Solution , Uper Shivpuri , Kanke Road, Ranchi , Jharkhand and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /284;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Ttype) with a maximum capacity of 300g. and minimum capacity of200 mg . The verification scale interval ( e) is 10mg. It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect. The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

088888

Figure-2Schematic Diagram of sealing provision ofthe model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. Adip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- rule (9 ) of rule 8 ofthe Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels) Rules, 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity up to 50kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg . to 50mg. and with verification scale interval (n) inthe rangeof5000 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[F. No.WM- 21 (98)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director ofLegal Metrology 8591 [ भाग II- खण्ड़ 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नईदिल्ली, 20 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3365.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हा गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप- नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स हाई - टैक सोल्यूशन , अपर शिवपुरी , कांके रोड, रांची , झारखण्ड द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसजेपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " स्टार जोनसन " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09/ 11 /285 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा . और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

B3007

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । माडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 के या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 98 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन . दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8592

[PART II-SEC . 3 (章 ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 20th September, 2011

S.O. 3365. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) read with sub - rule (6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platformtype) with digital indication of medium accuracy (accuracy class - III ) of series " SJP" and with brand name " STAR JONSON" ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/s . Hi - Tek Solution, Uper Shivpuri , Kanke Road , Ranchi , Jharkhand and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/ 285 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Ttype) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg . and minimum capacity of 2kg. The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1Moden

83597

Figure- 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

The Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50kg . and up to 5000kg with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e' value of 1×10k, 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k, where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle, design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[F. No. WM- 21 (98) /2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legai Metrology 8593 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली , 20 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3366.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्लोबल टैक्नोलोजी , 28 , एम एस नायडु स्ट्रीट , ओल्ड वाशरमनपेट , चेन्नई -21 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जीटीटी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबलटाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्राण्ड का नाम " ग्लोबल " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 /11 / 329 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 5 ग्रा . है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

83614

0000

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

डिस्पले की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर डिस्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ जुड़े हुए डिस्पले के बेस प्लेट और टॉप कवर में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकालकर सील से जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलबंद करने के उपबंध का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम उपरोक्त दिया गया है ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 100 मि.ग्रा. से 2 ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) और 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 * , 2 × 10 * या 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[ फां. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 86 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8594

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( i ) ] New Delhi , the 20th September , 2011

S.O. 3366. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below ) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule ( 4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non- automatic weighing instrument ( table top type ) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - III ) of series " GTT and with brand name " GLOBAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model ) , maunfactured by M/ s . Global Technologies, 28 , M.S. Naidu Street , Old Washermanpet Chennai - 21 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09 / 11 / 329 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Ttype ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 5g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicates the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply

Figure- 1 Model

B3614

0000

Figure - 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card/ mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 10,000 for ' e' value of 100 mg. to 2g . and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10 % , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 86)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8595 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 20 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3367. केन्द्रीय सरकार का, विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा:

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स ग्लोबल टैक्नोलोजी , 28 , एम एस नायडु स्ट्रीट , ओल्ड वाशरमनपेट , चेन्नई -21 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " जीटीपी " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " ग्लोबल " है, (जिये इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/ 09 / 11 / 330 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 2 कि. ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 100 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत- प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ ड़ी कार्ड/ मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है, विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 5 ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापयान अंतराल ( एन ) और 50 कि. ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 % , 5 × 10 धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम--21 ( 86 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 4182GI /11-8 8596

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

New Delhi , the 20th September, 2011

S.O. 3367. Whereas the Central Government, after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval ofModels) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise ofthe powers conferred by section 22 ofthe Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub -rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with digital indication of medium accuracy ( accuracy class - II) of series " GTP " and with brand name GLOBAL " ( hereinafter referred to as the said Model) , manufacturedby M/ s. Global Technologies , 28 , M.S. Naidu Street, Old Vashermanpet , Chennai - 21 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11/330;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument (Platform type) with a maximum capacity of 1000 kg. and minimum capacity of2 kg . The verification scale interval (e) is 100g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode ( LED) display indicates the weighing results . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure- 1 Model

Figure- 2Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model.

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole inbase plate and top cover ofdisplay, then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration. Adip switch has also been provided inA/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - rule (9) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make, accuracy and performance ofsame series with maximum capacity above 50 kg and up to 5000 kg with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g . or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2x10 or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No.WM - 21 (86)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8597 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 21 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3368.-केन्द्रीय सरकार का , विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 6 ) और नियम 11 के उप -नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सैफरॉन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स स्केल , 1 , सहयोग चैम्बर्स , मिनी बाजार , सरदार चौक के पास , वाराक्सा, सूरत -395006 द्वारा विनिर्मित विशेष यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -1 ) वाले " एसईएसटी-1 " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का , जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सैफरॉन " है ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09/ 11 / 346 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाण - पत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक इलैक्ट्रो मैगनेटिक फोर्स कम्पेनसेशन प्रिंसिपल पर आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकार ( टेबल टाप टाइप इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 1000 ग्रा. है और न्यूनतम क्षमता । ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 10 मि.ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधयतुलन युक्तिहै जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । लिक्विड क्रिस्टल डायोड ( एल सी डा प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

आकृति-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

FAL

0000

SHAL

SAL WIRE.

BOTTOM OF SCALL

ISOSQUARE

SAFFRON

SE AL

आकृति-2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम ।

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाण - पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल का विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो 1 मि.ग्रा . या अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 50000 या अधिक के रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2× 10 , 5 × 10 , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम-21 ( 142 ) / 2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8598

[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

New Delhi , the 21st September , 2011

S.O. 3368.-Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legai Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act . 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub- rule ( 6 ) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) ofrule 11 of the T. egal Metrology (Approval of Models ) Rules ,. 011 , the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the mode of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) withdigital indication of Special Accuracy ( Accuracy class - I ) of series " SEST 1 " and with brand name " SAFFRON' (hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufactured by M/ s . Saffron Electronics Scale . I Sahyog Chambers . Mini Bazar , Nr . Sardar Chowk , Varaxhha , Surat- 395 006 and which is assigned the approvat mark IND-09 11 300 ;

The said model is a Electro Magnetic Force Compensation Principle based non - automatic weighing instrument (Table Top Type) with a maximum capacity of 1000g . and minimum capacity of ig . The verification scade interval ( e ) is 10 mg. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) /Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicate the weighing result . Theinstrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply.

Figure-1

TOP BODY OF SCALE

A. WII

0000

LOARE SFAL

SEAL WIR

TEAD SQUARE

SAFFRON

Figure -2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model .

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display The scar is connected by Whole in base plate and top cover of display , then seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal .

A typical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above . Theinstrument has external control to calibration. A dip switch has ..... been provided in A/ D card/ mother board able access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule (9) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Model Rules, 2011 , the Central Govern: nent hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum сарасну upto 50 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 50000 or more for e ' value of i mg more and with ' e ' value of 1x10 , 2× 10kor 5 × 10k , wherek is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manuctured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 142)/2011 ]

B. DIXIT , Director of ! gal Metrology 8599 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली, 21 सितम्बर 2011

का.आ. 3369.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का कित प्राधि उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी ग . त देखें विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधा के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थि उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः, अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप नियम ( १ ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम (4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सैफरॉन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स स्केल, सहयोग चैम्बर्स , मिनी बाजार , सरदार चौक के पास , वाराक्सा , सुरत 395 006 द्वारा विनिर्मित उच्च यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग -11 ) वार " एसईएसटी- II " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( टेबल टाप टाइप ) के मॉडल का. जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सैफरॉन है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन हो.10 : 1 347 समनदेशित किया गया है, अनुमान प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विन्त गंज एकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकर रबल टाप टाइप ) है इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 30 कि. या. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 100 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयत्‌लन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धरित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य कर है ।

0000

SALIRON

मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

आकृति

सम्पल की बाडी में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर स्पले पर सीलिंग की जाती है । सील के साथ र पन के बेस ले और कवा में बने दो छेदों में से सीलिंग वायर निकाल कर मील में जोड़ा गया है । मॉडल को सीलब कर के उपबं का एक प्ररूपी योजनाबद्ध यग्राम उपरोक्न दिया गया है ।

उपकरण म बाहग कलिब्रशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है । बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को कने 'लए कार्ड मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विक भी दिया गया :

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान मॉडलों का अनुमोदन नियम 2011 नियम 8 के उप-नियम ( ५: द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस पत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिमाता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथाथता और कार्यपालन क तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे जो मि. ग्रा. से 50 मि.ग्रा. तक के " ई " मान के लिए 100 से 100,000 तक के रेंज में सत्याग्न मापमान अंतराल ( एन) और 100 मि.ग्रा. या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 5000 से 100,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल ( एन ) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 % , 2 × 10 * , 5 × 10 के , के हैं, जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शुन्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यूएम -21 ( 142 ) /2011 ]

बी. एन. दीक्षित, निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8600

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

New Delhi the 21st September , 2011

S.O. 3369 .-- Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of 2010) and the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to render accurate service under varied conditions:

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of 2010 ) read with sub - rule ( 6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table top type) with digital indication of high Accuracy (Accuracy class - II ) of series " SEST - II " and with brand name " SAFFRON " ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Saffron Electronics Scale , 1 , Sahyog Chambers , Mini isazar , Nr . Sardar Chowk, Varaxhha . Surat - 395006 and which is assigned the approval mark IND / 09 / 11 / 347 ;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non - automatic weighing instrument ( Table Top Type ) with a maximum capacity of 30kg . and minimum capacity of 100g . The verification scale interval ( e ) is 2g . It has a tare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect The Light Emitting Diode ( LED ) display indicate the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

ligure - 1 Model

TOP BODYOF LA

0000

SAFFRON

STOM ( Figure - 2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

whol Sealing is done on and display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display . The seal is connected by in base pide and top cover of display . than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal . A typical schema diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above.

The instruments external control to calibration. A dip switch has also been provided in A/ D card ' mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval of Models ) Rule . 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity upto 50kg . with verification scale interval ( n) in the range of 100 to 100,000 for ' e ' value of 1mg to 50mg and with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 5000 to 100.000 for ' e ' value of 100mg . or more and with ' e ' value of i × 10 , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which , the said approved model has been manufactured.

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 142 )/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology 8601 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

नई दिल्ली , 21 सितम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3370.- केन्द्रीय सरकार का विहित प्राधिकारी द्वारा उसे प्रस्तुत रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है कि उक्त रिपोर्ट में वर्णित मॉडल ( नीचे दी गई आकृति देखें ) विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का 1 ) तथा विधिक माप विज्ञान (मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के उपबंधों के अनुरूप है और इस बात की संभावना है कि लगातार प्रयोग की अवधि में भी उक्त मॉडल यथार्थता बनाए रखेगा और विभिन्न परिस्थितियों में उपयुक्त सेवा प्रदान करता रहेगा;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , विधिक माप विज्ञान ( माडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप-नियम ( ० ) और नियम 11 के उप - नियम ( 4 ) के साथ पठित विधिक माप विज्ञान अधिनियम , 2009 ( 2010 का । ) की धारा 22 द्वारा शक्तियों को प्रयोग करते हुए मैसर्स सैफरॉन इलैक्ट्रोनिक्स स्केल , 1 , सहयोग चैम्बर्स , मिनी बाजार , सरदार चौक के पास , वाराक्सा , सूरत 395 006 द्वारा विनिर्मित मध्यम यथार्थता ( यथार्थता वर्ग- III ) वाले " एसईएसपी- III " श्रृंखला के अंकक सूचन सहित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) के मॉडल का, जिसके ब्रांड का नाम " सैफरॉन " है , ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त मॉडल कहा गया है ) और जिसे अनुमोदन चिह्न आई एन डी/09 / 11 / 348 समनुदेशित किया गया है , अनुमोदन प्रमाणपत्र जारी करती है ।

उक्त मॉडल एक विकृत गेज प्रकार का भार सेल आधारित अस्वचालित तोलन उपकरण ( प्लेटफार्म टाइप ) है । इसकी अधिकतम क्षमता 150 कि.ग्रा. और न्यूनतम क्षमता 400 ग्रा. है । सत्यापन मापमान अन्तराल ( ई ) 20 ग्रा. है । इसमें एक आधेयतुलन युक्ति है जिसका शत - प्रतिशत व्यवकलनात्मक धारित आधेयतुलन प्रभाव है । प्रकाश उत्सर्जक डायोड ( एलईडी ) प्रदर्श तोलन परिणाम उपदर्शित करता है । उपकरण 230 वोल्ट और 50 हर्ट्ज प्रत्यावर्ती धारा विद्युत प्रदाय पर कार्य करता है ।

Max 1000 Kg

Min 02 Kg

E 100 g

Class III

SAFFRON

आकृति -2 मॉडल को सीलिंग करने का योजनाबद्ध डायग्राम

उपकरण में बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच की सुविधा है। बाहरी केलिब्रेशन तक पहुंच को रोकने के लिए ए/ डी कार्ड/मदर बोर्ड में डिप स्विच भी दिया गया है ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार विधिक माप विज्ञान ( मॉडलों का अनुमोदन ) नियम , 2011 के नियम 8 के उप - नियम ( 9 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए यह घोषणा करती है कि उक्त मॉडल के अनुमोदन के इस प्रमाणपत्र के अंतर्गत उसी विनिर्माता द्वारा उसी सिद्धांत , डिजाइन के अनुसार और उसी सामग्री से जिससे उक्त अनुमोदित मॉडल विनिर्माण किया गया है , विनिर्मित उसी श्रृंखला के वैसे ही मेक , यथार्थता और कार्यपालन के तोलन उपकरण भी होंगे 5 ग्रा . या उससे अधिक के " ई " मान के लिए 500 से 10,000 तक की रेंज में सत्यापन मापमान अंतराल (एन) सहित 50 कि.ग्रा. से 5000 कि.ग्राम . तक की अधिकतम क्षमता वाले हैं और " ई " मान 1 × 10 , 2 × 10 , 5 × 10 के , के हैं , जो धनात्मक या ऋणात्मक पूर्णांक या शून्य के समतुल्य हैं ।

[फा. सं. डब्ल्यू एम -21 ( 142 ) /2011 ] बी. एन. दीक्षित , निदेशक , विधिक माप विज्ञान 8602

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II--SEC . 3 ( ii) New Delhi , the 21st September, 2011

S.O. 3370. Whereas the Central Government , after considering the report submitted to it by the prescribed authority, is satisfied that the Model described in the said report ( see the figure given below) is in conformity with the provisions ofthe Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ( 1 of2010) and the Legal Metrology (Approval of Models) Rules 2011 and the said model is likely to maintain its accuracy over periods of sustained use and to rendes accurate service under varied conditions;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 22 of the Legal Metrology Act , 2009 ( 1 of2010 ) read with sub- rule (6) of rule 8 and sub - rule (4) of rule 11 of the Legal Metrology ( Approval ofModels ) Rules , 2011 the Central Government hereby issues and publishes the certificate of approval of the model of non - automatic weighing instrument (Platformtype) with digital indication of Medium Accuracy (Accuracy class - III ) of series " SESP - III " and with brand name " SAFFRON" ( hereinafter referred to as the said model ) , manufacturedby M/ s . Saffron Electronics Scale , 1 , Sahyog Chambers , Mini Bazar , Nr. Sardar Chowk, Varaxhha , Surat - 395 006 and which is assigned the approval mark IND/09/ 11 /348;

The said model is a strain gauge type load cell based non- automatic weighing instrument ( Platform Type ) with a maximum capacity of 150kg . and minimum capacity of400g . The verification scale interval ( e) is 20g. It has atare device with a 100 per cent subtractive retained tare effect . The Light Emitting Diode (LED) indicate the weighing result . The instrument operates on 230 Volts , 50 Hertz alternative current power supply .

Figure- 1 Model

INE

Max_1000 Kg

Min_02 Kg

E_100 g

Class III

STAL WIRE

Figure-2 Schematic Diagram of sealing provision of the model

Sealing is done on the display by passing sealing wire from the body of the display. The seal is connected by whole in base plate and top cover of display, than seal wire is passed through these two holes attached with seal Atypical schematic diagram of sealing provision of the model is given above .

The instrument has external control to calibration . Adip switch has also been provided in A/D card/mother board to disable access to external calibration .

Further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub - rule ( 9 ) of rule 8 of the Legal Metrology (Approval of Modeis) Rules , 2011 , the Central Government hereby declares that this certificate of approval of the said model shall also cover the weighing instruments of similar make , accuracy and performance of same series with maximum capacity above 50 kg . and upto 5000 kg . with verification scale interval (n) in the range of 500 to 10,000 for ' e ' value of 5g. or more and with ' e ' value of 1 × 10k , 2 × 10k or 5 × 10k , where k is a positive or negative whole number or equal to zero , manufactured by the same manufacturer in accordance with the same principle , design and with the same materials with which, the said approved model has been manufactured .

[ F. No. WM - 21 ( 142)/2011 ]

B. N. DIXIT, Director of Legal Metrology λους [ भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र वम्बर 26. 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

( भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो )

नई दिल्ली , 1 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3371.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उप- नियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय माएक ब्यूरो एत‌द्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिस भारतीय मानक का विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिया गया है वे स्थापित हो गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

स्थापित तिथि स्थापित भारतीय मानक ( कों) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

नये भारतीय मानक द्वारा अतिक्रमित भारतीय मानक अथवा मानकों , यदि कोई हो , की संख्या और वर्ष

(3)

(2)

(1)

01 नवम्बर 2011 आई एस 15999 ( भाग 2/ अनुभाग 1 ) : घूर्णी विद्युतीय मशीनें भाग 2 : परीक्षण पद्धतियाँ अनुभाग । परीक्षणों से हानि और दक्षता ज्ञात करने के लिए मानक पद्धतियां ( संकर्षण वाहनों की मशीनों को छोड़कर )

इस भारतीय मानक की एक प्रति भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुरशाह जफर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली , कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई , मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलुरू , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : ईटी 15/टी -93 ]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक ' ई' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी)

(Bureau of Indian Standards)

New Delhi , the 1st November, 2011

S. O. 3371. In pursuance of clause (b) of sub- rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been established on the date indicated against each : -

SCHEDULE

Date of Established

No. and Year of the

No. and year of the Indian Standards

Indian Standards , if any, Superseded by the New Indian Standards

(3)

( 2)

(1)

01 November , 2011 IS 15999 ( Part 2/ Sec 1) : 2011 Rotating electrical machines : Part 2 Method of tests Section 1 Standard methods for determining losses and efficiency fromtests ( excluding machines for traction vehicles )

Copy of this Standard is available for sale with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavar , 9 , Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur. Kanpur , Nagpur , Patna , Pune and Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET 15/ 1-93 ]

R. K. TREHAN , Scientist ' E ' & Head ( Electrotechnical ) 4182 GI /11-9 3604

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( i) ]

नई दिल्ली, 9 नवम्बर, 2011

का.आ. 3372.-भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अधिसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं : -

अनुसूची

क्रम सं. संशाधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधन लागू होने की तिथि (1)

(2)

(3)

(4) 1. आई एस 366 : 1991 की संशोधन संख्या 6

1-11-2011

6, अक्तूबर 2011

2. आई एस 14155 : 1994 की संशोधन संख्या 1

1-11-2011

1 , अक्तूबर 2011

इन संशोधनों की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह ज़फर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली-110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़, चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद, बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी, हैदराबाद , जयपुर, कानपुर , नागपुर, पटना, पूणे तथा तिरूवन-तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[संदर्भ : ईटी 32/टी-4 , दी-30]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक ' ई' एवं प्रमुख (विद्युत तकनीकी )

New Delhi , the 9th November, 2011

S.O. 3372. In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed have been issued:

SCHEDULE

Sl.No. No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No.& year of

Amendment

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

01-11-2011 1 .

6, October, 2011

IS 366 : 1991 Electric Irons - Specification

01-11-2011

1, October, 2011

2. IS 14155 : 1994 Domestic electric clothes washing machines for household use Specification

Copy of this Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices: New Delhi , Kolkata, Chandigarh , Chennai , Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Hyderabad , Jaipur, Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna, Pune . Thiruvananthapuram .

[Ref: ET 32/T-4 , T- 30]

R. K. TREHAN , Scientist ' E ' & Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली , 11 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3373.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो नियम , 1987 के नियम 7 के उपनियम ( 1 ) के खंड ( ख ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि नीचे अधिसूची में दिये गये मानक ( कों ) में संशोधन किया गया/किये गये हैं : - 8605 [ भाग II-खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

अनुसूची

संशोधन की संख्या और तिथि

संशोधित भारतीय मानक ( कों ) की संख्या , वर्ष और शीर्षक

संशोधन लागू होने कीतिथि

(2)

(3) (1)

31-10-2011 आई एस 1293 : 2005 की संशोधन संख्या 5

05, अगस्त, 2011

इस संशोधन की प्रतियाँ भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो , मानक भवन , 9 , बहादुर शाह ज़फर मार्ग , नई दिल्ली -110002 , क्षेत्रीय कार्यालयों : नई दिल्ली, कोलकाता , चण्डीगढ़ , चेन्नई, मुम्बई तथा शाखा कार्यालयों : अहमदाबाद , बंगलौर , भोपाल , भुवनेश्वर , कोयम्बतूर , गुवाहाटी , हैदराबाद , जयपुर , कानपुर , नागपुर , पटना , पूणे तथा तिरूवनन्तापुरम में बिक्री हेतु उपलब्ध हैं ।

[ संदर्भ : ईटी 14 /टी -5 ]

आर. के. त्रेहन , वैज्ञानिक ' ई ' एवं प्रमुख ( विद्युत तकनीकी )

New Delhi , the 11th November , 2011

S.O. 3373.-In pursuance of clause (b ) of sub - rule ( 1 ) of Rule 7 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules , 1987 , the Bureau of Indian Standards hereby notifies that the amendment to Indian Standards , particulars of which are given in the Schedule hereto annexed has been issued :

SCHEDULE

No. & Year of the Indian Standards

No. & year of

Amendment

Date from which the Amendment shall have effect

(2)

(3) (1)

31-10-2011

05 , August , 2011

Amendment No. 5 to IS 1293 : 2005 Plugs and socket- outlets of rated voltage upto and including 250 volts and rated current upto 16 amperes Specification

Copy of this Amendment is available with the Bureau of Indian Standards , Manak Bhavan , 9 , Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg , New Delhi - 110002 and Regional Offices : New Delhi , Kolkata , Chandigarh Chenna . Mumbai and also Branch Offices : Ahmedabad , Bangalore , Bhopal , Bhubaneshwar , Coimbatore , Guwahati , Herabad , Jaipur , Kanpur, Nagpur , Patna , Pune . Thiruvananthapuram .

Ref : ET 14/ T- 5 ]

R. K. TREHAN . Scientist ' E ' & Head ( Electrotechnical )

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3374.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1986 के विनियम 4 के उप-नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में लिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : - 856

GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVECKER , 2017AGRAHAY , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3(ii) )

अनुसूची

भाग

वर्षी लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता

अनु लाइसेंस संख्या

क्रम स.

भामा संख्या

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि, वर्ष/माह

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

(1) (2)

(4)

(5)

(6) (7)

(3)

(9 )

(8 ) 05-09-2011

14543

2004 1. 3739070

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

हिमाचल अक्वा गाला सं. 1 और 2 , प्लॉट सं. 17 , फेज 4 , एस सं. 25 , जेनेसिस इण्डस्ट्रियल टाउनशिप , गट सं. 240 , पालघर, जिला ठाणे-401404

3741057 05-09-2011

2004 योग बेवरेजेस प्रा. लि. गट सं.- 536/1 , पालसे शुगर फैक्ट्री के नजदीक , नानेगॉव के नजदीक , नासिक-422 401

पैकेजबंद पीने का 14543 पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनस्ल जल के अलावा)

3740156

2004

14543

15-09-2011

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

एस एस जीआरपी फूड और एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज प्रा. लि. सर्वे सं. 392 , पडाली देशमुख शिवर , इगतपुरी , जिला नासिक-422 403

2004 4. 3762570

14543

28-09-2011 ट्रोनिटी बेवरेजेज , बतिम, पोर्टल भट , पो ऑ गोवा, वेल्हा, इलास , गोवा-403108

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2006 28-09-2011

5. 3762671

15658

खडंजे के लिए पूर्व ढलित कंक्रीट ब्लाक्स

डाइनामिक्स मेंन प्री फॅब लिमिटेड , गट सं. 32 , गाँव चेंदेवली , शहापुर वाडा रोड, वाडा, जिला थाणे-421303

1990 6.

2553

भाग ।

3766376 10-10-2011

निरापद ग्लास , भाग । , सामान्य उद्देश्य

असाही इंडिया ग्लास लिमिटेड , टी-16, तलोजा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया , तलोजा, पनवेल , जिला-रायगढ़-410208

2004

14543

7. 5758 21-10-2011

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

गोदामृतृत फुड्स और बेवरेजेस , गट सं. 405 , चांदगिरी , पनाशी, ब्राम्हणवाडे रोड, नासिक पूणे हाइवे, नासिक-422 101

2004 3764069 21-10-2011

14543

पैकेजबंद पीने का पानी ( पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

ओरॅकल अक्बाप्युर प्राइवेट लिमिटेड , 16 ए , गव्हर्नमेंट इंडस्ट्रियल इस्टेट , चारकोप , कांदिवली-पश्चिम, मुंबई-400 067

1989

12786

24-10-2011

सिंचाई पार्श्व के लिए पॉलीइथलीन पाइप

नीर इरिगेशन , 20/21 , जैनम इंडस्ट्रियल पार्क, शांग्रीला वाटर पार्क के बाजुमें, पोस्टबोरिवली , ( कुकसे ) , मुंबई नासिक हाइवे, भिवंडी, जिला थाणे-400 302

[सं. सीएमडी/13: 11 ]

देवदत्त झा, वैज्ञानिक' एफ' एवं प्रमुख भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8607

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2011

S.O.3374.-In pursuance of sub - regulation (5 ) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , hereby notifies the grant of licences particulars of which are given in the following schedule:-

SCHEDULE

Grant Date

Licences No.

Sl. No.

Name & Address of the Party

(2)

(4)

(3)

(1)

1. 3739070 5-09-2011 HimachalAqua , Gala No. 1 & 2 , Plot No , 17 , Phase IV, S. No 25 , Genesis Indl . Township, Ghat No. 240, Palghar, Dist . Thane -401 404 5-09-2011

2. 3741057

Yog Beverages Pvt . Ltd. , GutNo. 536/1 , Near Palse Sugar Factory, Nanegaon , Nasik -422401

15-09-2011

3. 3740156

S.S. GRP Food and Agro Industry Pvt . Ltd. , Survey No. 392 , Padali Deshmukh Shivar , Igatpuri , Dist. Nashik-422 403 4. 3762570 28-09-2011 Trinity Beverages , Batim, Portel Bhatt , P.O. Goa, Velha, Ilas , Goa-403 108 3762671

28-09-2011 DynamixMan Pre Fab Ltd. , GatNo. 32 , Village Chendevali , Shahpur - Wada Road, Wada , Distt . Thane-421 303 6. 3766376 10-10-2011 Asahi IndiaGlass Limited, T- 16 , Taloja Indl . Area , Taloja Panvel , Distt . Raigad -410 208 21-10-2011

7. 3759783

Godaamrut Foods and Beverages,, GatNo. 405 , Chandgiri , Panashi , Bramhanwade Road, Nashik Pune Highway, Nashik -422 101 8. 3764069 21-10-2011 Oracle Aquapure Private Limited, 16.A, Government Industrial Estate Charkop , Kandivli (W) Mumbai -400 067

Sec . Year

IS No. Part

Title of the Standard

(7)

(9). (5)

(6).

(8)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

14543

2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

15658

2006 Precast Concrete Block for Paving

1990

2553

Safety Glass - Part1 -General Purpose

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) 8608

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26. 2011 / AGRAHAYANA , 1933

( 1)

(3)

(2)

(4)

9. 3736064 24-10-2011 NeerIrrigation

20/21 , Jainum Industrial Park , Near Shangrila Water Park , Post: Borivali (Kukse ) , Mumbai - Nashik Highway, Bhiwandi , Distt . Thane -400302

[ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (5)

(6) (7)

(9)

(8)

1989 Irrigation Equipment 12786

Polyethylene Pipes

for Irrigation Laterals

[ No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] DEV DUTT JHA , Scientist ' F ' & Head

नई दिल्ली , 14 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3375.-- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम 1988 के विनियम 5 के उप - विनियम ( 6 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द कर दिया गया है : -..

अनुसूची

क्र.

लाइसेंस लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता सं.

संख्या

सीएम/एल

(2)

(3)

(1)

1. 7230557 कोसल पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज एफ-72 , एमआईडीसी , जिला लातूर, महाराष्ट्र-413 531

2. 7900475 सुप्रीम गोल्ड पीवीसी पाइप इंडस्ट्रीज , प्लॉट नं. बी-4/2 , एमआईडीसी इंडस्ट्रीयल एरिया, जिला नांदेड महाराष्ट्र-431603

रद्द करने की तिथि लाइसेंस के अन्तर्गत वस्तु/प्रक्रम सम्बद्ध

भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक

(4)

(5) भामा 4985 : 2000

4-10-2011 पेयजल आपूर्ति के लिए अनम्यकृत पीवीसी पाइप्स

19-10-2011 भामा 14151 ( भाग 2 ) : 1999

सिंचाई उपस्कर स्प्रिंकलर पाइप्स भाग 2 : सहज संयोजी पालीए‌थिलीन पाइप्स

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 : 13 ]

बी. एम. हनीफ , वैज्ञानिक ' एफ ' एवं प्रमुख

New Delhi , the 14th November , 2011

S.O. 3375.- In pursuance of sub - regulation ( 6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards ( Certification) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each :

SCHEDULE

Sr. No. Licence No. CM/L

Name and Address of the Licensee

(2)

(3)

(1)

7230557 Kosa! Pipe Industries F- 72, MIDC , District Latur Maharashtra - 413531

7900475 Supreme Gold PVC Pipe Industries Plot No. B -4/2 , MIDC Indl . Area , District Nanded , Maharashtra-431 603

Date of

Cancellation Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence cancelled/ suspension

(4)

(5) IS4985 : 2000

4-10-2011 Unplasticized PVC pipes for potable water supplies

19-10-2011 IS 14151 ( Part 2) : 1999 Irrigation equipment - sprinkler pipes- Part 2 : Quick coupled polyethylene pipes

[ No. CMD/ 13: 13 ]

B. M. HANEEF, Scientist ' F ' & Head [भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

8609

नई दिल्ली, 14 नवम्बर , 20.11

का.आ. 3376.- भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ( प्रमाणन ) विनियम , 1988 के विनियम 4 के उप - नियम ( 5 ) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं , वे स्वीकृत कर दिए गए हैं : -

अनुसूची

पार्टी का नाम व पता क्रम सं.

लाइसेंस संख्या

स्वीकृत करने कीतिथि

(1) (2)

(4)

(3)

1. 3762469 27-09-2011 बीएसआर वाइब्रोटेक इंडस्ट्रीज गट सं. 151 , एट विशाकखेड , पोस्टपिंपलवांडी, तालुका जुन्नर , जिला पुणे , महाराष्ट्र -412 412 27-09-2011

2. 3736165

निम्बस बेवरेजेज प्रा. लि. के-148 , सं. 101 , एमआईडीसी , वालुज , जिला औरंगाबाद , महाराष्ट्र-431 136 19-09-2011

3. 3763976

श्री साई बेवरेजेज ह. नं. बी-1349 , समर्थनगर, बासमत , तालुका बासमत , जिला हिंगोली , महाराष्ट्र -431 513 4. 3765273 11-10-2011 प्रीतम हाई- टेक प्रा. लि. प्लाट नं. जी-2 /ए , एमआईडीसी कुपवड, तालुका मिरज जिला सांगली , महाराष्ट्र-416 436 5. 3765475 11-10-2011 अजय इंडस्ट्रीयल कार्पोरेशन लि. गट सं . 381/382 , विलेज विंग , तालुका खंडाला , जिला सातारा , महाराष्ट्र-412 801 13-10-2011

6. 3747574

लक्ष्मी मिनरल वॉटर गट सं. 117/94 , गांव शिरोली, तालुका हतकानंगले , जिला कोल्हापुर , महाराष्ट्र । 7. 3747170 13-10-2011 यशराज इंडस्ट्रीज गट सं. 1030 , हारेवाडी, विटा तालुका खानापुर , जिला सांगली, महाराष्ट्र-415 311

भामा भाग अनुभाग वर्ष भारतीय मानक काशीर्षक

(5)

(6) ( 7 ) (8) ( 9 )

458

2003 प्रीकॉस्टकांक्रीट पाइप्स ( प्रबलन सहित और रहित)

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

13592

1992 संवातन और वर्षा के पानी तंत्र सहित भवनों के अंदर की मिट्टी तथा अपशिष्ट निरावेशन तंत्र के लिए अनम्यकृत यूपीवीसी पाइपें - विशिष्टि

15778

2007 गर्म और ठंडे पेयजल

के लिए क्लोरीनेटेड पाली - विनायल क्लोराइड ( सीपीवीसी ) पाइप्स, वितरण आपूर्ति के लिए ।

2004

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा) 8610

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

( 1) (2)

(3)

(4)

8. 3767176 14-10-2011 अंबिका इंटरप्राइजेज सी-156 , एमआईडीसी वालुज , तालुका गंगापुर, जिला औरंगाबाद , महाराष्ट्र-431 136 16-9-2011

9. 3732763

रूशिशवर इंडस्ट्रीज गट सं. 170 , एट सावगी, तालुका मनवात , जिला परभणी , महाराष्ट्र 10. 3738977 13-10-2011 कोठारी एग्रो फूड्स प्रा. लि. स. नं. 66 , अहनकर देओलगांव , तालुका एवं जिला जालना, महाराष्ट्र-431 203 11. 3769483 24-10-2011 निरलेप आप्लाइंसेज लि. गट सं. 16, नायगांव , खाडेवाडी, तालुका बैठन , जिला औरंगाबाद, महाराष्ट्र-431 136 3733159 24-10-2019

12.

औट फूड्स एंड बेवरेजेज गट सं. 9/1 /ए, एट शैवालवाडी, पोस्ट मंचर , तालुका आम्बेगांव , जिला पुणे, महाराष्ट्र-410 503 13. 3769988 24-10-2011 साई इंडस्ट्रीज गेट सं. 17 , म.नं. 47 ( ए) , ए/बी काबनूर , तालुका हातकानंगले , जिला कोल्हापुर , महाराष्ट्र-416 129

[PART IISEC.3 (ii)] (5)

(6) (7) (8) ( 9 )

4250

1980 घरेलू इलेक्ट्रिक फूडमिक्सर्स (लिक्विडाइजर्स एंड ग्राइंडर्स)

14543

वैकेजबंद पेयजल

2004 (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

14543

पैकेजबंद पेयजल

2004 (पैकेजबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

1982 पिटवां एल्युमिनियम 1660 01

के बर्तन - भाग 1 भोजन पकाने , परीसने और रखने के जतन

14543

2004 पैकेजबंद पेयजल

(पैकेअबंद प्राकृतिक मिनरल जल के अलावा)

13487

1992 सिंचाई उपस्कर ईभीटर्स- विशिष्टि

[सं. सी एम डी/ 13 :11 ] बी. एम. हनीफ , वैज्ञानिक ' एक' एवं प्रमुख

NewDelhi , the 14th November , 2011

S.O. 3376. In pursuance of sub - regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations , 1988 , of the Bureau of Indian Standards , fhereby notifies the grant of licences particulars ofwhich are given in the following schedule :--

SCHEDULE

Sl .

GrantDate

Licence No. No.

Name & Address of theParty

(3)

(4)

(1) (2)

27-09-2011

1. 3762469

BSR Vibrotech Industries GatNo. 151 , At Vishakkhed, PostPimpalwandi , Taluka Junnar, District Pune, Maharashtra -412412

ISNo. Part Sec . Year Title ofthe Standard

(6) (7)

(5)

(8) (9)

458

2003 Precast Concrete Pipes (With and without Reinfor- cement) [ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii) )

8611

भारत का राजपत्र नवस्बर 26, 201 अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

2. 3736165 27-09-2011 Nimbus Beverages Pvt . Ltd. , K- 148 , No. 101 , MIDC , Waluj , DistrictAurangabad, Maharashtra-431 136, 19-09-2011

3. 3763976

Shri Sai Beveragos , H. No. B- 1349, Samarthnagar, Basmath, TalukaBasmath, DistrictHingoli, Maharashtra -431513 3765273 11-10-2011 PreetamHI -Tech Pvt . Ltd. , Plot No. G - 2/A , MIDC Kupwad, Taluka Miraj , District Sangli, Maharashtra-416436 5. 3765475 11-10-2011 AjayIndustrial Corporation Ltd. , GatNo. 381/382, Village Wing, Taluka Khandala, District Satara, Maharashtra -412 801 13-10-2011

6. 3747574

Laxmi Mineral Water, Gat No. 117/94 , Village Shiroli , Taluka Hatkanangale , District Kolhapur , Maharashtra 13-10-2011

7. 3747170

Yashraj Industries , GatNo. 1030, Harewadi , Vita, Taluka Khanapur, District Sangli , Maharashtra -415311 14-10-2011

8. 3767176

AmbikaEnterprises , C-156 , MIDC Waluj , TalukaGangapur, DistrictAurangabad, Maharashtra-431 136 9. 3732763 16-9-2011 Rushishwar Industries , GatNo. 170 , At Sawangi , Taluka Manwat , District Parbhani , Maharashtra 13-10-2011

10. 3738977

Kothari Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. , S. No. 66, Ahankar Deolgaon , Taluka& District Jalna , Maharashtra-431 203 4182GI /11-10

(5)

(6)

(9)

(7) (8)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than PackagedNatural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Minoral Wator)

1992

13592

Unplasticized Ployvinyl Chloride (UPVC) Pipes for Soil and Waste Discharge System for Inside and Outside Buildings Including Ventilation and Rainwater System- Specification

15778

2007 Chlorinated PVC Pipes for Potable Hot and Cold Water Distribution Supplies

14543

2004 Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

PackagedDrinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

4250

1980 Domestic Electric Food Mixers (Liquidizers and Grinders)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than PackagedNatural Mineral Water)

2004

14543

Packaged Drinking Water (Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) 8612

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

(1) (2)

(3)

(4)

11. 3769483 24-10-2011 NirlepAppliances Ltd. , Gat No. 16, Naigaon , Khandewadi , Taluka Paithan , District Aurangabad, Maharashtra -431 136 12. 3733159 24-10-2011 Shete Foods & Beverages , Gat No. 9 / 1 / A , At Shewalwadi , Post Manchar , Taluka Ambegaon , District Pune , Maharashtra -410 503 13. 3769988 24-10-2011 Sai Industries , Gat No. 17 , M. No. 47 (A) , A/P Kabnoor , Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur , Maharashtra -416 129

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] (5)

(6)

(9)

(7) (8)

1982

1660

Wrought Aluminium Utensil - Part 1 :

Cooking Table , Serving Storing and BakingUtensils

14543

2004 Packaged Drinking Water ( Other than Packaged Natural Mineral Water)

1992 Irrigation Equipment- 13487

Emitters- Specification

[ No. CMD/ 13 : 11 ] B. M. HANEEF, Scientist ' F ' & Head

कोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली , 18 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3377.-केन्द्र सरकार ने , भारत के राजपत्र , भाग II , खण्ड 3 , उप - खण्ड ( ii ) तारीख 13 मार्च , 2010 में प्रकाशित , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी , भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की आधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 720 तारीख 8 मार्च , 2010 द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट क्षेत्र 374.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 924.15 एकड़ ( लगभग ) भूमि में कोयले के पूर्वेक्षण के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी ;

और केन्द्रीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है, कि इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्य है ;

अतः , अब केन्द्रीय सरकार , उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित 134.25 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) या 331.73 एकड़ ( लगभग ) भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार एवं 239.75 हेक्टर ( लगभग) या 592.42 एकड़ ( लगभग ) भूमि में या उस पर ( जहां खनन अधिकार प्राप्त है ) , सतह अधिकार [ सम्मिलित 374.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग ) ] या 924.15 एकड़ ( लगभग ) का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ;

टिप्पण 1: - इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या सी-1 ( ई ) III/ एफआर/ 869-0911 , तारीख 8 सितम्बर , 2011 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर , नागपुर ( महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता - पिन-700 001 के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक ( भूमि एवं राजस्व) , वेस्टर्न कोलफिल्ड्स लिमिटेड ( राजस्व विभाग ) , कोल इस्टेट , सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर -440 001 ( महाराष्ट्र ) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण 2: - उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृष्ट किया जाता है , जिसमें निम्नलिखित उपबंध हैं:- अर्जन की बाबत आपत्तियां :

"8(1) कोई व्यक्ति, जो किसी भूमि में , जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना निकाली गई है , हितबद्ध है , अधिसूचना के निकाले जाने से तीस दिनों के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हीं अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सकेगा ।

स्पष्टीकरण

(1) इस धारा के अर्थान्तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहीं मानी जाएगी , कि कोई व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संक्रियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संक्रियाएं केन्द्रीय सरकार या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति को नहीं करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उप- धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि व्यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच , यदि कोई हो , करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है , वह या तो धारा 7 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट केन्द्रीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के लिए देगा । 8613 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह व्यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबद्ध समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता , यदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अर्जित कर लिए जाते है । " टिप्पण 3 : - केन्द्रीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता -700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्यांक काः आ. 2519 , तारीख 27 मई , 1983 द्वारा भारत सरकार के राजपत्र भाग II खंड 3 , उप - खंड ( ii ) , तारीख 11 जून , 1983 द्वारा प्रकाशित को सक्षम प्राधिकारी द्वारा नियुक्त किया जाता है ।

अनुसूची

सावनेर भूमिगत खान संख्या 1 विस्तार

नागपुर क्षेत्र

जिला - नागपुर ( महाराष्ट्र)

[ रेखांक संख्या सी -1 ( ई ) III /एफआर/ 869-0911 , तारीख 8 सितम्बर , 2011

सभी अधिकार :

(भाग - 'क' )

क्रम सं . ग्राम का नाम पटवारी सर्किल संख्या

तहसील

जिला

क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में टिप्पणियां 1 .

129.93

अदासा

भाग

कलमेश्वर

नागपुर

4.32

सावनेर

भाग कोटोड़ी

नागपुर

कुल: - 134.25 हेक्टर ( लगभग )

या 331.73 एकड़ ( लगभग ) रेखांक संख्या सी -1 ( ई ) III / एफआर/ 869-0911 , तारीख 8 सितम्बर , 2011 ]

सतह अधिकार ( जहां खनन अधिकार पूर्व से प्राप्त है ) :

(भाग- 'ख ' )

ग्राम का नाम पटवारी सर्किल संख्या

क्रम सं.

तहसील

जिला क्षेत्रफल हेक्टर में टिप्पणियां 1.

कलमेश्वर

180.03

भाग बोरगांव

नागपुर

सावनेर

59.72

भाग

नागपुर

पटकाखेड़ी

कुल: - 239.75 हेक्टर ( लगभग ).

या 592.42 एकड़ ( लगभग ) अनुसूची ( भाग -' क ' ) + अनुसूची ( भाग - 'ख ' ) = कुल

( सभी अधिकार ) ( सतह अधिकार )

+ 239-75 =

134.25

374.00 हेक्टर ( लगभग)

+ 592.42

या 331.73

924.15 एकड़ ( लगभग )

ग्राम अदासा में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:

160, 163 , 164, 165 , 166 सड़क ( भाग ) , 167, 168 , 169 ( वन ) , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 176बी , 177 , 178 , 182 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , सड़क , 191/1 , 191/2 , 191/3 नाला , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218/1 , 218/2 , सड़क , 223 , सड़क , 224 , 225 , 228 बी , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 ( सरकारी ) , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244/1 , 244/2 , 245/1 , 245/2 , 246बी , 254 , 255 , 257 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 270 , 274 , 280 .

ग्राम कोटोड़ी में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक :

79, 80 , और 89.

8514

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART I SEC . 3( ii) ] ग्राम बोरगांव में अर्जित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक :

14 , 15 , 18/1 , 18/2 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240, 246, नाला , 247 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 256 , 257 , 263 , 264/1-264/2,268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276, 277 ( वन ) , 278 , 279 , 280 , 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 , 285 , 286 , 287 , 288 , 289, 290/ए/ 1 , 290ए/2 , 291 , 292 , 293/1 , 293/2 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 , सड़क, 312 , 313 , 314 ए , 314बी , 315 , 316 , 317 , 318 , 319 , 324 , 325 , 326/1 , 326/2 , सड़क , 334 , 335 , 336 , 337 , 338 , 339 , सड़क , 340 , 341 , 342 ( सरकारी ) , 343 , 344 , 345 , 346 ( सरकारी ) , 348 , 349 , 350 , 351 , 352 , 353 , नाला , 361 , 363 , 364-364/2 , 365 , 366 , 367, 368 , 369( वन ) , 370 , नीला, 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378 ए , 378थी , 379 , 380 , 381 ए, 381 बी , 382 , 383 , 384, 385 , 386 , 387 , 388 , 389 , 390 , 391 , 392 , 393 , 394 , 395 , 396 , 397 , 398 , 399 , 400 , 401 , 402 , 403 , 404/1-404/2 , 405,406.

ग्राम पटकाखेड़ी में अजित किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:

141 , 142 , 143 , सड़क , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159/1-159 /2 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164/1-164/2-164/3-164/4 , 165/1 , 165/2 , 166 , 167/1-167/2 , 168 , 169 , 170 , नाली , 171/1-171/ 2 , [ सरकारी ( भाग ) ] , 172, 173/1-173/2 , 174 , 175 , 178 सीमा वर्णन: -

क ख: रेखा ग्राम बोरगांव में बिन्दु ' क ' से आंरम्भ होती है और प्लॉट संख्यांक 326 /1-326/2 , 325 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है, फिर सड़क पार करती है तथा प्लॉट संख्या 299 की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है , फिर सड़क पार करती है तथा प्लॉट संख्यांक 334 , 335 , 336 , की बाह्य सीमा से होकर गुजरती है सड़क एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 340 , 341 , 342 , 346 की बाहध सौभा से गुजरती है तथा नाला की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती है एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 370 , 374 , 375 , 376 , 377 , 378बी , 380 , 381 बी , 382 , 384 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर ग्राम बोरगांव तथा ग्रीम परकाखेड़ी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती है और ग्राम पटकाखेड़ी के प्लॉट संख्यांक 170 , 169 , 168 , 167/ 1-167/2 , 166 , 173/1-173/2 , 172 , की बाह्य सीमा के साथ गुजरती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 171/1-171 /2 , में से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ख ' पर मिलती है ।

ख - ग : रेखा ग्राम पटकाखेड़ी में प्लॉट संख्यांक 171 / 1-171 / 2 , से होकर गुजरती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 178 , 172 , 173 / 1-173 / 2 , 174 , 175 , 164 / 1-164/ 2-164/3-164/ 4 , 163 , 162 , 160 , 159/ 1-159/ 2 , 156 , 155 , 154 , 153 , की बाह्य सीमा से होकर गुजरती है तथा सड़क पार करती हुई सड़क एवं प्लॉट संख्या 143 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ग ' पर मिलती है । ग -घ: रेखा ग्राम पटकाखेड़ी के प्लॉट संख्यांक 143 , 141 , 142 , सड़क, 157 , 158 , 163 , की बाह्य सीमा से होकर गुजरती है फिर नाला तथा ग्राम पटकाखेड़ी और ग्राम अदासा की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा को पार करती हुई ग्राम अदासा के प्लॉट संख्यांक 191 / 1-191 /2-191 /3 , 218/ 1- 218/2 तथा सड़क की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर सड़क की पार करती हुई सड़क तथा प्लॉट संख्यांक 223, की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती है एवं प्लॉट संख्या 223 तथा सड़क , एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 224 , 225 , 228 बी , 244/ 1-244/2, 245/1-245 / 2 , 255 की बाहय सीमा से गुजरती हुई पुनः सड़क की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और प्लॉट संख्र्याक 257 , 259, 260 की बाहय सीमा से गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' घ ' पर मिलती है ।

घङ : रेखा ग्राम अदासों में प्लॉट संख्यांक 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , की बाह्य सीमा एवं ग्राम अदासा तथा ग्राम कोटोड़ी की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा से गुजरती है फिर ग्राम अदीसा एवं ग्राम कोटीड़ी के प्लॉट संख्यांक 89 , 80 , 79 , की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' ङ ' पर मिलती है ।

: रेखा ग्राम अदासी में प्लॉट संख्यांक 269 , 280 , 274 , 267 को बाह्य सीमा से होकर गुजरती है और सड़क की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है , फिर सड़क को पार करती हुई प्लॉट संख्यांक 254 , 246 बी , 244/1-244/2 , 240 , 239 , की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है तथा सड़क पार करती हुई प्लॉट संख्या 210 , सड़क , की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 199 , 198 , 182 , 176 , 177 , 178 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती हुई सड़क पार करती है और प्लॉट संख्यांक 160 , 163 की बाह्य सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु ' च ' पर मिलती है ।

च -छ: रेखा ग्राम अदासा एवं ग्राम बोरगांव की सम्मिलित सीमा रेखा को पार करती हुई ग्राम बोरगांव में प्लॉट संख्यांक 393 , 391 , 394 , 401 , 402 , 18 / 1-18 / 2 , 15 , 14 , 406 , 405 , 404/1404/2,की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 364-364/2 , 363 , 361 , फिर नाला की सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है , और प्लॉट संख्यांक 246 , 238 , 240 , 239 , 238 , 236, 237 , फिर नालों की सीमा से लंगकर , फिरे प्लॉट संख्यांक 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 256 , 257 , 268 , 264 /1-264/2 , 263, की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई बिन्दु ' छ ' पर मिलती है । 8615 [ भाग - खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

छ -क: रेखा ग्राम बोरगांव में ग्राम बोरगांव एवं निलगांव की सम्मिलित ग्राम सीमा एवं प्लॉट संख्यांक 263 , 271 , 272 , 273 , की बाहय सीमा से गुजरती हुई नाला पार करती है , फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 317 , 318 , 319 , 314 ए, 313 , की बाध्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई सड़क पार करती है फिर प्लॉट संख्यांक 312 , 324 , 326/1-326-2 , की बाह्य सीमा से गुजरती हुई आरंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा. सं. 43015/24/2009- पीआरआईडब्ल्यू- 1 ]

ए. के. दास , अवर सचिव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi , the 18th November, 2011

S.O. 3377.- Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal Number S.O. 720 dated the 8th March, 2010 , issued under sub- section ( ' ) of Section 4 ofthe Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in Part II , Section 3 , Sub- section (ii ) of the Gazette of India, dated the 13th March , 2010 , the Central Covernment gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 374.00 hectares (approximately) or 924.15 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification;

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands described in the Schedules appended to this notification ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire al ! rights in or over the land measuring 134.25 hectares (approximately ) or 331.73 acres ( approximately ) and Surface Rights in or over the land measuring 239.75 hectares (approximately) or 592.42 acres (approximately) (where Mining Kights already exists ) [ total 374.00 hectares ( approximately) or 924.15 acres ( approximately ) ] as described in the Scheduit appended hereto.

Note 1 : The plan bearing number C - 1 ( E ) III /FR/ 869-0911 , daied the 8th September, 2011 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the Collector , Nagpur ( Maharashtra ) or at the effice of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council House Street, Kolkata ( Pin - 700 001 ) or at the office ofthe General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department) , Coal Estate , Civil Lines , Nagpur- 440001 ( Maharashtra).

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of Section 8 of the aforsaid Act which provides as follows :---

Objections to Acquisition:

8( 1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued , may, within thrity days of the issue of the notification , object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land .

Explanation-

(1) It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertake by the Central Government or by any other person .

(2) Every objection under sub - section ( 1 ) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall , after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government , containing his recommendations on the objections , together with the record of proceedings held by him , for the decision of that Government .

(3) For the purpose of this section , a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act . " Note 3 : The Coal Controller , 1 , Council House Street , Kolkata - 700001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act , vide notification number S.O. 2519 dated the 27th May, 1983 , published in Part - II , Section 3 , Sub - section ( ii ) of the Gazette of India , dated the 11th June, 1983 .

8616

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA5, 1933

SCHEDULE

SAONER UNDERGROUND MINE NUMBER 1 EXPANSION

[PART 11 SBC. 3 ( ii)]

NAGPUR AREA

DISTRICT- NAGPUR ( MAHARASHTRA)

(Planbearing number C - 1 ( E ) III/FR/ 869-0911 , dated the 8th September, 2011 )

ALL RIGHTS :

[PART- ' A' ]

Tahsil SINo. Name of village Patwari Circle number

Adasa

Kalmeshwar

Kotodi

Saoner District

Area inhectares Remarks

129.93

Part Nagpur

4.32

Part Nagpur

Total: 134.25 hectares ( approximately) or 331.73 acres ( approximately) (Planbearing number C - 1 (E) III/FR/ 869-0911 , dated the 8th September , 2011 )

SURFACE RIGHTS (Where Mining Rights already exists):

[PART-'B']

Tahsil SINo. Name of village Patwari Circle number 1.

Kalmeshwar

Borgaor

Patkakhedi

Saoner SCHEDULE ( PART- ' A' + SCHEDULE (PART - ' B' ) = TOTAL (ALL RIGHTS

(SURFACE RIGHTS) +

134.25 hectares

District

Area in hectares Remarks

80.03

Part Nagpurl

9.72

Part Nagpur5

Total: 239.75 hectares ( approximately) or 592.42 acres ( approximately )

239.75 hectares = 374.00 hectares ( approximately)

331.73 acres

592.42 acres =924.15 acres (approximately )

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Adasa:

160, 163 , 164, 165, 166 Road (Part) , 167, 168 , 169 (Forest) , 170, 171 , 172, 173 , 174, 175 , 176A, 176B , 177, 178 , 182, 183 , 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190 Road, 191/1 , 191/2 , 191/3 , Nallah . 192, 193 , 194, 195, 196, 197, 198 , 199 , 210 , 211 , 212 ,213 , 214, 215 , 216 , 217, 218/ 1,218 /2 , Road, 223 , Road , 224 , 225, 228B, 231 , 232, 233, 234, 235 , 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 (Govt ), 241 , 242 , 243, 244/1 , 244/2,245/1-245/2 , 246B , 254, 255 , 257, 259, 260 , 261 , 262, 263, 264, 265 , 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 274, 280.

Plotnumbers to be acquired in village Kotodi :

79,80 and 89 .

Plotnumbers to be acquired in village Borgaon :

14, 15 , 18 / 1,18 /2 , 236, 237, 238 , 239 , 240, 246, Nallah , 247 , 248, 249 , 250, 251 , 252, 253, 256, 257 , 263 , 264/ 1-264/2, 268, 269, 270, 271 , 272 , 273 , 274, 275, 276, 277 ( Forest)] 278 , 279 ,, 277 ( Forest) ] 278 , 279 , 280, 281 , 282, 283 , 284, 285, 286, 287 , 288 , 289 , 290/Α/ 1 , 290/A-2,291,292.293/ 1,293 /2,294,295,296,297,298 , 299 , 300 , 301, 302, 303 , 304, 305, 306, 307, 308 , 309,310,311 , Road , 312,313,314A , 314B , 315 , 316, 317, 318 , 319 , 324, 325, 326/1 , 326/2, Road, 334, 335 , 336, 337, 338, 339 Road, 340, 341 , 342 (Govt.), 343 , 344, 345 , 346 ( Govt . ), 348 , 349, 350, 351 , 352, 353 , Nallah, 361 , 363 , 364, 364/2 , 365 , 366, 367, 368, 369(Forest) ,370 , Nallah , 371,372 , 373,374, 375, 376 , 377 , 378A, 378B , 379 , 380, 381A, 381B, 382 , 383 , 384, 385, 386, 387 , 388, 389, 390, 391,392, 393,394,395,396,397,398 , 399, 400, 401 , 402 ,403 , 404/1 , 404/2 ,405,406 .

8617 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Plot numbers to be acquired in village Patkakhedi :

141,142, 143 , Road, 153 , 154, 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159/ 1-159/2 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164/ 1-164/2 , 164/3-164/4, 165/ 1,165/2 , 166 , 167/1-167/2 , 168 , 169 , 170 , Nallah , 171 / 1-171 / 2 , [ Government (Part ) ] , 172 , 173/ 1-173 /2, 174 , 175 , 178 .

Boundarydescription:

A- B: Line start from Point ' A' of village Borgaon and passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 326/ 1-326/2, 325, crosses the village Road then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot number 299 , then crosses the Road , then passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 334, 335 , 336 , Road, plot numbers 340, 341 , 342, 346, Nallah , plot numbers 370, 374, 375, 376, 377 , 378B, 380 , 381B, 382, 383, 384, of village Borgaon then crosses the common village boundary ofvillages Borgaon and Patkakhedi then passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 170, 169, 168 , 167/1-167/2 , 166, 173 / 1-173/2 , 172 , then passes through plot numbers 171 / 1-171 / 2 , and meets at Point 'B' .

B -C: Line passes through plot numbers 171 / 1-171 /2, of village Patkakhedi then passes through outer boundary ofplot numbers 178 , 172 , 173 / 1-173 / 2 , 174 , 175 , 164/ 1-164/2-164/3-164/4 , 163, 162 , 160, 159/ 1-159 /2, 156, 155 , 153, then crosses the village Road , then crosses of village Patkakhedi and passes along the outer boundary of Road, plot number 143 and meets at Point ' C ' .

C -D: Line passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 143 , 141 , 142 , Road, 157 , 158 , 163 , then crosses the Nallah and village boundary of villages Patkakhedi and Adasa , then proceeds along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 191/1-191/2-191 / 3 , 218 /1-218 /2 , then crosses the Road , then passes along the boundary of plot number, 223 , Road , 224 , 225 , 228B , 244/ 1-244/2 , 245/1-245 /2 , 255 , Road, plot numbers 257, 259, 260 ofvillageAdasa and meets at Point ' D ' .

D -E: Line passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264, 265 , and passes along the common boundary of villages Adasa and Kotodi , then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot numbers 89 , 80 , 79 , of village Kotodi and meets at Point ' E' .

E -F: Line crosses the common boundary of villages Kotodi and Adasa , then line passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 269 , 280 , 274 , 267 , Road , and crosses the Road then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 254, 2468, 244/1-244/2 , 240, 239 , crosses the Road of villageAdasa, then passes along the outer boundary ofplot number 210, Road and crosses the village Road , then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 199 , 198 , 182 , 176 / A , 177 , 178 , crosses the Road , then passes along the outer boundary of plot numbers 160 , 163 , and meets at Point ' F' .

F -G : Line passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 393 , 391 , 394 , 401 , 402 , 18/ 1-18 /2 , 15 , 14, 406 , 405,404/1-404/ 2, crosses the village Road then passes the outer boundary of plot numbers 364-364/ 2 , 363 , 361 , then passes along the boundary ofNallah, and plot numbers 246, 238 , 240, 239, 238 , 236, 237, then crosses the Nallah , then passes along the outerboundary ofplot numbers 250, 251 , 252 , 253 , 256, 257, 268, 264/ 1-264/2, 263 , and meets at Point 'G' .

G-A: Line passes along the common boundary of villages Borgaon and Nilgaon and also passes along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 263 , 271 , 272 , 273 , then crosses the Nallah then proceeds along the outer boundary of plot numbers 317 , 318 , 319 , 314A , 313 , then crosses the village Road of village Borgaon, then proceeds along the outer boundary ofplot numbers 312 , 324 , 326/ 1-326 /2 , and meets at starting Point ' A' ,

[F. No. 43015/24/ 2009- PRIW - IJ

A.K. DAS , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 18 नवम्बर , 2011

का.आ. 3378. केन्द्र सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है , कि इससे उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में उल्लिखित परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में से कोयला अभिप्राप्त किए जाने की संभावना है ;

और , रेखांक संख्यांक आरईवी/ 05 / 2010 , तारीख 14 जुलाई , 2010 को उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि के क्षेत्र का अन्तर्विष्ट किया गया है , उनका निरीक्षण सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड ( भूमि और राजस्व विभाग ) , दरभंगा हाउस , रांची-834 029 ( झारखंड ) के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक , राजहरा क्षेत्र , उपायुक्त, चतरा , झारखंड या महाप्रबंधक ( खोज प्रभाग , आरआई- III , केन्द्रीय खान योजना एवं डिजाइन संस्थान , गोंडवाना प्लेस , कांके रोड , रांची के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक , 1 , काउंसिल हाउस स्ट्रीट , कोलकाता के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , कोयला धारक क्षेत्र ( अर्जन और विकास ) अधिनियम , 1957 ( 1957 का 20 ) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्तअधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में कोयले का पूर्वेक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।.

उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति 8618

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [ PART 11-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] (i) संपूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उसके ऊपर किसी अधिकार के अर्जन पर आक्षेप , या ( ii ) भूमि या ऐसी भूमि पर कोई अधिकार के प्रतिकर के हित के यदि कोई दावा , या

( iii) खनन पट्टा अर्जित किए जाने के अधीन अधिकारों की पूर्वेक्षण अनुज्ञप्ति प्रभावहीन हो जाने और भूमि संबंधी सभी नक्शे , चाटों तथा अन्य दस्तावेजों का परिदान , अयस्कों या अन्य खनिजों के नमूनों का संग्रहण और उनका सम्यक विश्लेषण करने के लिए तथा उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 13 की उप - धारा ( 7 ) में निर्दिष्ट कोई अन्य सुसंगत अभिलेखों या सामग्रियों की तैयारी के लिए प्रत्तिकर , इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र में प्रकाशन की तारीख से नब्बे दिनों के भीतर , महाप्रबंधक , सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड, राजहरा क्षेत्र , जिला- चतरा ( झारखंड ) या महाप्रबंधक , सेंट्रल कोलफील्ड्स लिमिटेड भूमि और राजपत्र विभाग , दरभंगा हाउस , रांची -834 029 , ( झारखंड ) को भेजेगा ।

अनुसूची

मगध और आम्रपाली ब्लॉक ( टंडवा साउथ ब्लॉक )

जिला- चतरा ( झारखंड )

(रेखांक संख्यांक आरईवी/05/ 2010 , तारीख 14 जुलाई , 2010 )

क्रम सं. सौजा/ग्राम थाना

ग्राम/थाना संख्या जिले का नाम क्षेत्र (एकड़ में) क्षेत्र ( हेक्टेयर में ) टिप्पणियां 1.

टंडवा

चतरा

16.25

6.58

भाग

कुल:

16.25 एकड़ ( लगभग )

6.58 हेक्टेयर ( लगभग ) मगध और लॉक की सीमा का वर्णन :

क-ख- म - घ- ङ - स रेखा ' क ' से आरंभ होती है और मासीलौंग ग्राम से होती हुई जाती है और बिन्दु ' च ' पर मिलती है । च-छ

रेखा , मातीलौंग ग्राम से होती हुई बिन्दु ' छ ' पर मिलती है ।

छ-ज

रेखा , मासीलौंग और कामता ग्रामों के सम्मिलित सीमा से होती हुई निकलती है और बिन्दु ' ज ' पर मिलती है । ज-झ-ञ-क

रेखा, मांसीलौंग ग्राम से होती हुई जाती है और प्रारंभिक बिन्दु ' क ' पर मिलती है ।

[फा सं . 43015 / 17/ 2010- पीआरआई डब्ल्यू-1 ]

ए. के. दास , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 18th November , 2011

S.O. 3378.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality described in the Schedule annexed hereto ;

And, whereas , the plan bearing number Rev/05 / 2010 , dated the 14th July, 2010 containing details of the areas of lands described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Central Coalfields Limited ( Land and Revenue Department ) , Darbhanga House , Ranchi - 834 029 ( Jharkhand ) or at the office of the General Manager , Rajhara Area , Deputy Commissioner, Chatra , Jharkhand or at the office of the General Manager ( Exploration Division) , RI - III , Central Mine Planning and Design Institute, Gondwana Palace , Kanke Road , Ranchi or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1 , Council HouseStreet Kolkata ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferredby sub -section ( 1 ) of Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act , 1957 (20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act ) , the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for co from lands described in the said Schedule ;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may-

(1) object to the acquisition of the whole or any part ofthe land , or of any rights in or over such , land , or (ii) claim an interest in compensation ifthe landany rights in or over such land , or

(iii) seek compensation for prospecting licences ceasing to have effect , rights under mining leases being acquired, and deliver all maps , charts and other documents relating to the land , collection from the land of cores or other mineral samples and due analysis thereof and the preparation of any other relevant record or materials referred in in sub - section (7 ) of Section 13 of the said Act , भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8619 to the office of the General Manager , Central Coalfields Limited , Rajhara Area, District - Chatra ( Jharkhnad ) or General Manager , Central Coalfields Limited, Land and Revenue Department , Darbhanga House , Ranchi - 834 029 ( Jhariki and ) within ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette .

SCHEDULE

Magadh and Amarpali Block (Tandwa South Block)

District - Chatra (Jharkhand)

(Planbeaing number Rev/ 05 /2010 , dated the 14th July, 2010 )

Remarks

Name of District

Thana

Sl . No. Mauja/Village

Village/Thana number

Tandwa

Chatra

Masilung

Area ( in hectares )

Area (in acres)

16.25

6.58

Part Total : 16.25 acres ( approximately ) or 6.58 hectares ( approximately) Boundary Description of Magadh and Amarpali Block ( Tandwa South Block) :

A - B -C- D - E- F Line starts from ' A' and passes through in village Masilung and meets at point ' F ' .

F-G

Line passes , through in village Masilung and meet at point ' G ' .

G - H

Line passes , through common boundary of villages Masilung and Kamta andmeets at point ' H ' .

H - I -J -A

Line passes through in village of Masilung and meets at starting point' A' .

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

[ F. No. 43015 / 17 /2010 - PRIW - 1 }

A. K. DAS , Under Secy.

का.आ. 3379.-केन्द्र सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अनुसूची में उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।

और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि कच्चे पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के उड़ीसा राज्य स्थित पारादीप से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य स्थित हलदिया तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है, अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट है , प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए ;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण -1 के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को उड़ीसा राज्य में प्रचालन कि समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।

ग्राम का नाम

तहसील

तारीख

का.आ. नं. व

क्र. सं.

चोकिमठ

1970 - दिनांक 11-08-2004

कुजग

रागयागड

उदयबट

पारादापगड

नुआगड

4182GI /11-11

राज्य

जिला

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

28-02-2008

उड़ीसा

जगतसिंहपुर

28 02-2008

28-02-2008

28-02-2008 [ सं. आर-25011/21/2011- ओ आर -1 ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव 8620

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011

S.O. 3379. Whereas by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry Prtroleum and Natural Gas S.O. No. and date as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the right of user in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to those Notifications ;

And whereas , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - Section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands , free from all encumbrances in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ;

And a whereas , the Competent Authority has maded report to the Central Government that the Pipeline for the purpose of transportation of crude oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia , in the State of West Bengal has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification ;

Now, therefore , as required under Explanation -I of rule 4 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said Schedule as the dates of termination of operation in the State of Orissa .

'SCHEDULE

Sl . No. S.O. No. & Date

Tehsil

Name ofVillage

4 2

1970 DT. , 11-08-2004 Chukimatha

Kujang

Rangiagad

Udaybata

Paradipgarh

Nuagar

District

State

Closure of Declaration

28-02-2008

Orissa

Jagatsinghpur

28-02-2008

[ No. R- 25011 /21 /2011 -OR - 1 ] LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3380.-केन्द्र सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 (1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 कीउप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का.आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।

और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लगंमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।

और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि कच्चे पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के उड़ीसा राज्य स्थित पारादीप से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य स्थित हलदिआ तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट हैं, प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण । के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को उड़ीसा राज्य में प्रचालन कि समाप्ति की तारीख के ए में घोषित करती है ।

क्र.सं. का.आ. नं. व तारीख

ग्राम का नाम

तहसील

4 2

1189- दिनांक 01-04-2005 कान्डीआसाही चान्दबाली

तन्तुलाडहा

दओबल

आम्बुला

पुरुषोत्तमपुर

राज्य

जिला

प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख

29-02-2008 भद्रक

उड़ीसा

29-02-2008

29-02-2008 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5. 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5 2

बउलजोडा

मुल्काइमा

सानासगपुर

रामपुर

घाटपुर

बडासगपुर

माधापुर

लक्ष्माप्रसाद

सान्तरापुर

खाडजाण

भद्रक 2517-दिनांक 30-09-2004

तिहीडी

हरीसिंहपुर

भानूपुर

कान्हूपुर

सन्डकपुर

मीमानीपुर

ताराचन्दबिन्धा

बबनीबन्धा

हाबुडासिंह

साहापुर

कबिरपुर

जाफराबाद

नहुनापाल

बहाबलपुर

भद्रक 3.

2517- दिनांक 30-09-2004 कोडाबाटीयाबडा बासुदेबपुर

माबादिला

जगन्नाथप्रसाद

जयकुष्णपुर

कासिआभिराम

कमारगा

चिरोल

बलासुनलीया

खरादीबिनायकपुर

बासुदेबपुर

सुकदेबपुर

8621 6

29-02-2008

05-12-2007

29-02-2008

05 12-2007

05-12-2007

26-07-2006 उड़ीसा

26-07-2006

05-12-2007

29-02-2008

05-12-2007

105-12-2007

05-12-2007

29-02-2008

19-11-2007 उड़ीसा

19-11-2007

19 11 2007

19-11-2007

19-11-2007 3622

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

4 1

3. 2517 - दिनांक 30-09-2004

सुगुडा

गुआगा

बाखरपुर

बासठा

सुदशनपुर

सुआ

अरतुग

दामादरपुर

पढुआ

राधामोहनपुर 4.

265-दिनांक20-01-2005

[PART II-SEC . ( ii ) ]

19-11--2007

18-07-2007

19-11-2007 उड़ीसा

बासुदेबपुर भद्रक

बागदाबिनायकपुर

साबरपुर

कलासिया

19-11-2007

19-11-2007 [सं. आर-25011/22/2011-ओ आर-1 ]

लालछन्दमा, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011

S.O. 3380.- Whereas by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry Petroleum and Natural Gas S.Q. Nos . and date as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub- Section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ), the Central Government acquired the right of user in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to those Notifications ;

And whereas , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub -section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands , free from all encumbrances in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Government that the Pipeline for the purpose of transportation of crude oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia, in the State of West Bengal has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification ;

Now, therefore, as required under Explanation -I ofrule 4 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land) Rules , 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said Schedule as the dates of termination of operation in the State of Orissa .

Sl . No. S.O. No. & Date

Tehsil

NameofVillage

4 2

Kandiasahi

1 .

Chandabali

1189 Dt, 01-04-2005

Tentulidihi

Deobil

Ambulo

Purushottampur

Bauljuda

Mulkaema

State

District

Closure of Declaration 5

7 Bhadrak

Orissa

29-02-2008

29-02-2008 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Sansingpur

1189 Dt , 01-04-2005

Rampur

Ghatpur

Barasingpur

Madhapur

Lakshmiprasad

Santarapur

kharijana

Tihici 2

2517 DT 30-09-2004 Harshapur

Phanapur

Kanhapu .

Sandalpu

shandabun

Bubinbinda

Habudasingh

Sahapur

Kabirpur

Jafrabad

Norip

as tabalpur

8623

7 5

29-02-2008

05-12-2007

29-02-2008

05-12-2007

105-12-2007

05-12-2007

26-07-2006

Orissa

Bhadrak

26-07-2006

05-12-2007

29-02-2008

05-12-2007

05-12.2007

2008

2 2008

29-02 2008

19-11-2007

Orissa

Biadrak

Basudevnar

Kubara 2517 DT 30-09-2004

Mabagilia

Jagannathprasad

Jayakrusimapur

Kasiabhiran:

Kamargan

Chirol

Belasaunlia

Kharidabinyakpur

Basudebpur

Sukadevpur

Sungura

Guagan

Bakharpur

Bashathai

Sudarsanpur

Suan

Artung

19-11-2007

10.11.2007

19-11-2007

18-07-200 .

18-07-2007

18-07-2007 8624

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

Damodarpur

Parhuan

Radhamohanpur 265 DT 20-01-2005

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii )]

18-07-2007

Orissa

19-11-2007

Bagdabinayakpur Basudevpur Bhadrak

Sabarpur

Kalasia

19-11-2007

[No. R-25011 /22/2011 -OR - 1 ] LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 20।।

का. आ. 3381.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधीसूची में उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयाग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया था ।

आर केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त भूमियों में , सभी निकों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।

और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकन केन्द्रीय सरकार का रिपोर्ट दी है कि कच्चे पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटडके " ज्य स्थित पाराटीप से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य स्थित हलदिआ तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी ऐसी बार में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची से विनिर्दिष्ट हैं, प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए:

अतः अन कीिय सरकार पट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्का ! अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची क स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को उड़ीसा राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के प में घोषित करती हैं ।

तहसील क्र. सं. का.आ नं. व तारीख

ग्राम का नाम

1 2

2075-दिनांक 18-10-2004

सोरी

गुड

पटीमुन्डा

दिनपाही

बालिकतिरण

छतुबाटा

पाडाडिहा

ब्रहमपुर

अन्जा

साहसपुरा

रणभजपुर

कान्हआगालपुर

रहाणयागज

करन्जाबान्धा जिला

राज्य

प्रचालन की समाप्ति कीतारीख

18-07-2007 बालेश्वर

उड़ीसा

18-07-2007

28-07-2006 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

{ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5 1

डोलपुर

फतेहपुर

कल्याणा

नूआपुर

शालगा

अओडशाल

नरणाबांड़

श्राजंग

8625 6

18-07-2007

बालेश्वर

बालेश्वर 2675-दिनांक 18-10-2004

चकश्रारामपुर

बाइता

रहाणयागडिया

गम्भारिया

तुडरा

कुअरपुर

भीमपुर

चान्दिपुर

छीलयापदा

साहाजानगर

जयदेबकसपा

मझीकिया

पुरस्तमपुर

बडीकआ

पदमपुर

तालपदा

गुडु

रणसाहि

हिरागा

18-07-2007 उड़ीसा

18-07-2007

25-09-2007

बालेश्वर

बस्ता 3

2786- दिनांक 26-10-2004 टोलकडिहा

गोठागड़िया

मींसयाली

धपाकन्द

बड़खुदा

तिगीरिया

पाडापाडा

उड़ीसा

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 8026

[ PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

===

7 लक्ष्मनपडा

25-09-2007 धनाहाड!

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 बगुनिया

25-09-2007 कदोलहन्डा

25-09-2007 कुडइ

25-09-2007 पलासिया

दराडा

25-09-2007 दान्डि

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 दुन्डा

25-09-2007 कुसिदा

छीचना

25-09-2007 सियालियापदा

25-09-2007 बालिसाहा

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 पुटुरा

कमारगडिया

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 जामसुला

25-09-2007 गुहालिपडा

25-09-2007 आछ्यापदा

25-09-2007 पथदुर्गा

त्रलोकी

25-09-2007

25-09-2007 सिंगीपुर

नवेरा

25-09-2007 4

बालियापाल बालेश्वर

29-02-2008 2786-दिनांक 26-10-2004 रमु

उड़ीसा

29-02-2008 गोकुलानन्दुपर

धानदा

29-02-2008 निखारा

29-02-2008

29-02-2008 पालपदा

29-02-2008 दखिनपडा

उत्तरपडा

जलेश्वर बालेश्वर

01-02-2008 5

2786-दिनांक 26-10-2004

उड़ीसा

खालाबडिया

01-02-2008 कसिदा

01-02-2008

01-02-2008 देबकुमार

01-02-2008 गोरीबलदा

01-02-2008 सुल्तानपुर [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

सिमुलिया

घाटियाडा

झाड़पिपल

खुलुडा

उलुडा

नुआपला

नचिदा

देउरा

रघुचक

कुसुदा

गबगा

अलालबिन्धा

रायपुर

कुकुलेश्वर

पारुलिया

बटगा

कटिसाहा

मोहम्दराजपुर

रामचन्द्रपुर

मधुपूर

कुलिदा

बलरामपुर

बाघधडास

8627

01-02-2008

15-04-2008

15-05-2007

15-05-2007 [सं. आर-25011/23/2011- ओआर-1 ] लाल छन्दमा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011

S.O. 3381. Whereas by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Prtroleum and Natural Gas S.O. Nos . and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub-section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act , 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government acquired the right ofuser in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to those Notifications ;

And whereas , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands , free from all encumbrances in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has made report to the Central Government that the Pipeline for the purpose oftransportation of crude oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia , in the State of West Bengal has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification ;

Now, therefore , as required under Explanation - I of Rule 4 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules , 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said 4182GI /11-12 8628

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

Schedule as the dates of termination of operation in the State of Orissa .

Sl . No. S.O. No. & Date

Tehsil

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] District

State

Name ofVillage

4 1.

Gud

Soro 2675 Dt . 18-10-2004

Patimunda

Dinapahii

Baliktiran

Chhatubati

Poradiha

Brahampur

Anjee

Sahaspura

Ranbhanjpur

Closure of Declaration 5

7 Balasore

18-07-2007

Orissa

18-07-2007

Kanheiogalpur

Rahaniaganj

18-07-2007

28-07-2007

Karanjabindha

Dolpur

Fatehpur

Kalyani

Nuapur

Salagan

Odshal

18-07-2007

Narayanabara

Balasore 2675 Dt . 18-10-2004 Srijang

Balasore

Orissa

18-07-2007

Chak Srirampur

Boita

18-07-2007

Rahaniyagadia

Gambharia

Tundra

Kuanrpur

Bhimmpur

Chandipur

Chheliapada

Sahajanagar

Jaydevkasba

Majhikia

Purastampur

Barakia

18-07-2007

18-07-2007 8629 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

7 1

18-07-2007 Padampur

18-07-2007 Talapada

18-07-2007 Gudu

18-07-2007 Ranasahi

18-07-2007 Hirigan

Tolakdiha

Basta

Balasore

Orissa

25-09-2007 2786 Dt. 26-10-2004

25-09-2007 Gothagaria

Mainsiali

25-09-2007.

25-09-2007 Dhapakand

25-09-2007 Barakhudi

25-09-2007 Tigiria

25-09-2007 Porapara

25-09-2007 Lakshmanpara

25-09-2007 Dhanahanda

25-09-2007 Begunia

25-09-2007 Kadalihanda

25-09-2007 Kundei

25-09-2007 Palasia

25-09-2007 Darada

25-09-2007 Dandi

25-09-2007 Dunda

25-09-2007 Kusida

25-09-2007 Chhachina

25-09-2007 Sialiapada

25-09-2007 Balisahi

25-09-2007 Putura

25-09-2007 Kamargadia

25-09-2007 Jamsuli

25-09-2007 Guhalipada

25-09-2007 Achhuapada

25-09-2007 Pathadurga

25-09-2007 Trailoki

25-09-2007 Singipur

25-09-2007 Navera

29-02-2008

Balasore

Orissa

Remu

2786 Dt . 26-10-2004

Baliapal

29-02-2008 Gokulanandpur

29-02-2008 Dhanda

29-02-2008 Nikhira 8630

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ]

29-02-2008 Palpada

29-02-2008 Dakhinapada

Orissa

01-02-2008

Balasore

Jaleshwar

2786 Dt . 26-10-2004 Uttarpara

Khalabania

01-02-2008

01-02-2008 Kasida

01-02-2008 Debkumar

Gouri Belda

01-02-2008

01-02-2008 Sultanpur

01-02-2008 Simulia

01-02-2008 Ghantiari

01-02-2008 Jhadapimpala

Khuluda

01-02-2008 Uluda

15-04-2008

15-04-2008 Nuapali

15-04-2008 Nachinda

15-04-2008 Denuara

15-04-2008 Raghuchak

Kusuda

15-04-2008

15-05-2007 Gabagan

15-05-2007 Alalbinndha

15-05-2007 Raipur

15-05-2007 Kukuleshwar

Parulia

15-05-2007

15-05-2007 Batgram

Katisahi

15-05-2007

15-05-2007 Mohamadrajpur

15-05-2007 Ramchandrapur

15-05-2007 Madhupur

Kulida

15-05-2007

15-05-2007 Balrampur

15-05-2007 Baghadhadas

[ No. R - 25011 / 23 /2011 - OR - I ]

LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3382.- केन्द्रीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) , अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की नीचे दी गई अधिसूची में उल्लिखित तारीखों की संख्या का. आ. द्वारा उन अधिसूचनाओं से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन दिया था । [ भाग II - खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

8631 और केन्द्रीय सरकार ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप - धारा ( 4 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए उक्त भूमियों में , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त उपयोग का अधिकार इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित किया था ।

और जबकि सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने केन्द्रीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दी है कि कच्चे पेट्रोलियम तेल के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड के उड़ीसा राज्य स्थित पारादीप से पश्चिम बंगाल राज्य स्थित हलदिआ तक उपर्युक्त भूमियों में पाइपलाइन बिछाई जा चुकी है , अतः ऐसी भूमि के बारे में जिसका विवरण इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिर्दिष्ट हैं , प्रचालन समाप्त किया जाए;

अतः अब केन्द्रीय सरकार पेट्रोलियम पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1963 के नियम 4 के स्पष्टीकरण । के अधीन अपेक्षानुसार उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 7 में उल्लिखित तारीखों को उड़ीसा राज्य में प्रचालन की समाप्ति की तारीख के रूप में घोषित करती है ।

अनुसूची

जिला क्र. सं. का.आ. नं. व तारीख

ग्राम का नाम

तहसील

5 1 .

2578- दिनांक 05-10-2004 आखरासाली

राज्य

प्रचालन की समाप्ति कीतारीख

01-03-2008

महाकालपाडा केन्द्रापाडा

भारगडोबारन्डा

राजेन्द्रनगर

गुप्तागीरी

कोचिला

बाचुरिआ

अरोई

मालादिहि

परेश्वरपुर

नन्तर

बरडंग

जागती

बाहारसूबला

एकलपुर

बडाबईन्चा

बारादिहि

खोलानई

गुलुडिआ

काकटपुर

बन्घापारा

उड़ीसा

01-03-2008

महाकालपाडा केन्द्रपाडा

1190- दिनांक 01-04-2005 काकटपुर

बन्घापाडा

गोगुआ

बाबर

सानराहामा

उड़ीसा

01-03-2008

01-03-2008 8632

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1190-दिनांक 01-04-2005 सक्रूपा

पट्टामुन्डई

बाटिपाडा

सातकुडिया

बउलांग

ब्रहमपुर

चढेया

बुहाला

दउलि

बन्तो

अन्धारुआ

मालीपुर

अढाजोरि

बालिपाटणा

डामरपुर

श्रीरामपुर

पालपाटणा 4.

अलिहा

1190-दिनांक 01-04-2005

आउल

रायसरपुर

माहासानी

चन्डियागडी

शितलेश्वर

सालिअंच

नियाल

एन्डोल

तुन्गा

2236- दिनांक 06-08-2007

राजकनिका

परिनुआपाडा

मिराजपुर

कोथापाही

बालीबन्धा

आगापाडा

पेगरपाडा

नाहुनी

पन्की

[PART II--SEC . 3 (i ) ]

27-08-2007

उड़ीसा

केन्द्रपाडा

27-08-2007

27-08-2007 केन्द्रपाडा

27-08-2007

उड़ीसा

27-08-2007

14-01-2008

14-01-2008 केन्द्रपाडा

14-01-2008

उड़ीसा

14-01-2008

[सं. आर-25011/24/2011- ओआर -1 ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8633

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011

S.O. 3382. Whereas by Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry Petroleum and Natural Gas S.O. No. and date as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government acquired the right of user in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to those Notifications;

And whereas , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section (4 ) of Section 6 of the said Act , the Central Government vested the right of user in the lands , free from all encumbrances in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas , the Competent Authority has made a report to the Central Govern nent that the Pipeline for the purpose of transportation of crude oil from Paradip in the State of Orissa to Haldia , in the State of West Bengal has been laid in the said lands and hence the operation may be terminated in respect of the said lands which in brief are specified in the Schedule annexed to this Notification;

Now, therefore , as required under Explanation - I of rule 4 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land ) Rules , 1963 , the Central Government hereby declares the dates mentioned in column 7 of the said Schedule as the dates of termination of operation in the State of Orissa .

SCHEDULE

Tehsil Sl . No. S.O. No. & Date

Name ofVillage

4 1

Akharasali

2578 Dt 05-10-2004

District

State

Closure of Declaration

7 5

01-03-2008

Orissa

Mahakalapada

Bhargadobaranda

Rajendranagar

Guptagiri

Kochila

Bachuria

Aroi

Maladihi

Pareshwarapur

Nantar

Baradang

Jagati

Baharsubala

Ekalpur

Badabaincha

Baradihi

Kholanai

Guludia

Kakatpur

Bandhapara

1190 Dt 01-04-2005 Kakatpur

Kendrapara

01-03-2008

Orissa

Kendrapara

Mahakalapada

Bandhapara

Gogua

Babar

Sanrahama

01-03-2008

01-03-2008 8634

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1190 Dt 01-04-2005

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 5

27-08-2007

Pattamundai

Sankrupa

Batipada

Satakudia

Baulang

Brahampur

Chadheya

Buhala

Deuli

Banto

Andharua

Malipur

Adhajori

Balipatna

Damarpur

Srirampur

Palpatna

1190 Dt 01-04-2005 Aliha

Aul

Raisarpur

Mohasani

Chandiagadi

Sitleshwar

Salianch

Nial

Endol

Tunga

2236 D106-08-2007

Rajkanika

Parinuapada

Mirajpur

Kothapahi

Balibhanda

Agapada

Pegarpada

Nahuni

Panki

Orissa

Kendrapara

27-08-2007

Orissa

27-08-2007 Kendrapara

27-08-2007

14-01-2008

Orissa

14-01-2008 Kendrapara

14-01-2008

[No. R - 25011 /24 /2011 -OR - I ) LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3383.-केन्द्र सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि गुजरात राज्य में सलाया से उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में मथुरा तक पेट्रोलियम क्रूड के परिवहन के लिए " सलाया - मथुरा पाइपलाइन के अन्तर्गत डी- बॉटलनेकिंग परियोजना " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

8635 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 /अग्रहायण 5, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में, जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 . का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उपधारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है, उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनसाधारण को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री भीम सिंह , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड , ( पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) , निर्माण कार्यालय , प्लाट नं. 38-39 , एसडीसी विनय , ब्लॉक द्वितीय , चौथा तल , मौजी कॉलोनी , मालवीय नगर, जयपुर , राजस्थान-302017 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

राज्य : राजस्थान

जिला : सिरोही

तहसील : आबूरोड

क्षेत्रफल

खसरा संख्या

ग्राम का नाम

क्रम सं.

हेक्टेयर

वर्ग मीटर

एयर

(5)

(6)

(3)

(4)

(2)

(1)

70 1 .

904

सांतपुर

909

851/1336 ( सरकारी भूमि)

882 (सरकारी भूमि)

908/1341 ( सरकारी भूमि )

910 (सरकारी भूमि)

1602/911 ( सरकारी भूमि)

[सं. आर-25011/ 10/2011- ओआर-1 ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November, 2011

S.O. 3383.-Whereas , it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum crude a pipeline from Salaya in the State of Gujarat to Mathura in the State of Uttar Pradesh , (Under Salaya - Mathura Pipeline De - bottlenecking Project ) should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And, whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid , and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein ;

Any person interest in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies ofthis notification issued under sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general pulblic , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri Bhim Singh , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Construction Office , Plot No. 38-39 , SDC Vinay, Block II , 4th Floor, Mauji Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan -302017.

4182 Gi /11 13 8636

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

SCHEDULE

Tehsil : Aburoad

District: Sirohi

State: Rajasthan Sl . No.

Khasra No.

Hectare

Area Are Name ofVillage

Square Metre (2)

(1)

(3)

(4)

(5) (6) 1.

904

70 Santpur

909

851/1336 (Govt . Land)

882(Govt . Land)

908/134/1 ( Govt . Land )

910( Govt . Land)

1602/911 ( Govt . Land)

[No. R - 25011 / 10/2011 -OR - I ]

LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3384. केंद्रीय सरकार , पैट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 2 के खण्ड ( क ) के अनुसरण में , भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 3 दिसम्बर , 2005 को प्रकाशित पैट्रोलियम और प्राकृतिक गैस मंत्रालय की दिनांक 30 नवम्बर , 2005 की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 4526 में निम्नलिखित संशोधित करती है: -- उक्त अधिसूचना में , " मनोज कुमार , वरिष्ठ सिविल अभियंता , इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड , बरौनी- कानपुर पाइपलाइन , बरौनी, पोस्ट - बरौनी ऑयल रिफाईनरी , बेगुसराय , बिहार -851117 , " शब्दों तथा अंक के स्थान पर " अनिल कुमार , उप प्रबंधक ( तकनीकी सेवाएं) , इंडियन ऑयल कॉपोरेशन लिमिटेड , बरौनी- कानपुर पाइपलाइन , बरौनी , पोस्ट - बरौनी ऑयल रिफाईनरी , बेगुसराय , बिहार -851117 , " शब्द तथा अंक रखे जाएंगे ।

[सं. आर -25011 / 15/2005- ओ आर -1 ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव

New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011

S.O. 3384. In pursuance of clause ( a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right ofUser in Land ) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Number S.O. 4526 dated 30th November , 2005 , published in the Gazette of India on 3rd December 2005 :-

In the said notification ,

for the words " Shri Manoj Kumar , Senior Civil Engineer , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Barauni - Kanpur Pipeline , Barauni , P. O. Barauni Oil Refinery, Begusarai , Bihar - 851114 " , the words " Shri Anil Kumar , Dy . Manager ( Technical Services ) , Indian Oil Corporation Limited , Barauni -Kanpur Pipeline , Barauni , P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery, Begusarai , Bihar - 851114 , " shall be substituted .

[No. R-25011 / 15/2005 -OR - I ]

LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

8637 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

5 नई दिल्ली , 16 नवम्बर , 2011

333

0 02 20

4/2. कुरुम्बेरी

0 03 80

333

5ए

0 08 40

2बी

333

0 07 00 का. आ. 3385.- केन्द्रीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि लोकहित में यह आवश्यक है कि तमिलनाडु राज्य में कावेरी बेसिन रिफाइनरी , नरीमनम से त्रिची तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कार्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

333

2ए

0 01 10

333

499

0 05

2ए3 और ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए इस अधिसूचना से उपाबद्ध अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन आवश्यक है;

0 00

499

02 60

2 ए4

0 03 20

499

4ए

499

5 ए

499

0 00 40 अतः अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उनमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

498

0 02

498

497

0 00

05 75

0 00 उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि में हितबद्ध कोई व्यक्ति उस तारीख से , जिसको , भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रति लिखित रूप में आक्षेप श्री बी. भास्करन , सक्षम प्राधिकारी , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , सं. 10 , तिरू- वि- का- स्ट्रीट , राजाजिपुरम , तिरुवल्लुर , तमिलनाडु -602001 को कर सकेगा ।

05 75 अनुसूची

496

4बी 0 06 00 तिरुवारूर

जिला :

0 तालुका : तिरुवारूर

राज्य : तामिलनाडु

496

05 10

4ए

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

उप- खण्ड

496

08 सर्वेक्षण सं- खण्ड सं. सं. हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग

496

1बी

मीटर

496

12 75

।ए

05 60

340

0 03 60 2

0 01

328

4/2. कुरुम्बेरी

340

329

24 00

2बी

494

0 10

329

494

1सी

31 40

505 2बी 2 0

494

0 08 70

1बी 504

12 70

0 07 40

494

1 ए

504

01 80

350

40 7बी

326

350

04 10

326

349

0 10 80 6

326

349

0 01 80

326

0 01

349

326

349

2बी

01 50

02 50

326

349

0 00

2 ए

326

0 00 80 0 0 010 7ए 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.तिरुवादिरैमंगलम

503 8638

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [ PARI II-- SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] 1

6 78

4.तिरुवादिरैमंगलम

3 ए

177

3. वैप्पूर

11 78

10 50

178

0 22 25 78

03 20

तहसील : नन्निलम

जिला : तिरुवारूर

1 ए

राज्य : तामिलनाडु

गांव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं- उप- खण्ड

क्षेत्रफल

2 ए

खण्ड सं. सं. हेक्टेयर 81

एयर वर्ग

1 ए

11 60

मीटर 83

0 05 00

4 83

6 5

0 07 00

0 09 60

66. सोरक्कुडी

40 89

2ई 0 08 30

0 29 00 89

2बी

16 80

। ए

46 40 89

0 00

2ए3

1 जी 0 15 20 89

0 00

2 ए 2

। एफ 20 05 40 89

2ए ।

08 50

1 एफ 10

40 88

3डी 0 10

1सी 2 0 05

70 88

3 बी 0 09

1सी 0 06 20 88

3 ए2

07 20

ए

11 20 88

3ए 1

18 50 88

109

2सी

40 65. मूण्गीकुडी

0 00 40 60

3. वैप्पूर

0 03

109

2बी 0 05 60 60

109

0 05 40 84

0 32

101

6बी 0 17 00 86

0 28

101

0 01 40 86

0 01

101

2बी 0 12 60 87

1ए

27 70

101

2 ए

00 40 88

1 ए

100

0 08 50 94

1बी1

100

0 04 20 93

100

0 04 40 93

04 30 133

0 12

0 03

200 134

0 21

0 02 90 140

0 15

03 142

0 14

0 03 25 173

1 ए

3बी 0 03 25 174

0 09 45

3ए

03 00 174

0 09 75

0 06 60 175

0 13 50

0 06 90 176

0 07 85

बी

28 60 176

।ए

18 00 1

176

ΟΙ

।सी 0

12 80 177

0 08 80 8639

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

1बी

63. कुवलैक्काल

65. मूण्गीकुडी

1ए2

1 ए।

1बी

0 12

1ए

27 40

1ए

14 30

04 40

3ए

1 सी

6बी 0

0 03

6ए

5बी

5ए

0 03

0 09

5ए

05 75

64.मूलंगुडी

00 80

2सी

2बी

8सी

8बी

४ए

5बी

5ए

17 50

1बी 2

। बी।

।बी

3इ

63.क्वलेक्काल

3डी

3सी

3बी

3ए

7बी

04 40

4बी

4ए

5ए

09 30

2बी

2ए

1बी

1 ए

0 03

0 06

4बी

4ए

40 90

01 20

07 90

12बी

12ए

।।बी

0 02

।।ए

0 07 00 5

0 07

07 20

0 08 80 4

0 08 40

56 Bride

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

6 64 अलंगई।

6बी

6ए

07 15

0 08 80

0 00 40

07 90

0 00 40

0 ΟΙ 60

0 06 00

5बो 0 01 65

5ए

93 00

0 03 00

।ए

0 09 00

।बी 0 00 40

188

57 तट्टाती मूलै

0 00 80

188

0 01

188

9ए

05 40

187

10ए

187

0 03 05

187

8ए

05 20 187

6ए

15 186

0 04 40 186

0 08 50 186

0 03 10 184

1बी 0 18 90 184

1ए

14 30 183

504 0 05 15 183

02 90 183

502

00 183

5ए। 0 02

90 183

4ए

0 11

35 183

3ए 0 20 50

2ए

09 35 '83

। ए

00 182

11 ए

05 182

0 02 70 182

0 01

10ए

35 110

0 01

11 ए

40 110

[PART II--SEC. 3 (ii )] 1

6 110

57. तट्टाती मूलै

9ए

07 00 110

0 07

४ए

75 110

7ए

08 10 110

6ए

10 00 110

0 08

10 110

70 110

2बी 0 01

60 110

2ए

01 90 110

0 02 50

108

0 08 20 108

0 06 50 108

0 05 75 108

0 04 10 107

0 04 00 107

0 05 30 107

0 03 80 107

0 03 65 107

0 09 60 55

5ए

11 20 55

4ए 0 09 20 55

3ए 0 05 40 54

5ए2 0 05 10 54

5ए । 0 04 85 54

4ए

06 50 54

3 ए

08 30 54

0 06

2 ए

50 54

0 07

1 ए2

40 54

1 ए ।

10 51

6ए

11 15 51

5ए 0 04 35 51

4ए

03 80 51

3ए2

07 40 51

3ए ।

80 51

2ए

07 40 51

। ए

07 40 49

10 ए

10 25 49

0 03 95 49

6बी ।

01 65 49

6बी 2

20 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

8641

0 02

58. कीरंगुडी

6ए

57. तट्टाती मूलै

3ए

2ए2

2ए 1

1ए

3ए

2ए

।सी।

0 02

1बी!

0 07

1ए।

6ए

5ए

4ए

00 40

7ए

5ए

4ए

3ए

04 60

2ए

06 50

3ए

2ए

17 30

41.

1ए

19 30

4ए

3ए

2ए

1 ए

2ए

57. दीबंगुडी

3ए

1ए

राज्य : तामिलनाडु

जिला : तिरुवारूर

तालूका : कुडवासल

क्षेत्रफल

उप - खण्ड

सर्वेक्षण सं-

गांव का नाम

वर्ग

हेक्टेयर एयर

सं.

खण्ड सं.

मीटर

1बी

1ए

0 09

2बी

2ए

0 05

19 20 4

0 11

3सी

39. संबंगुडी

1002

58. कीरंगुडी

10ए)

9ए

8ए

7ए

0 01

6ए

5ए

4ए

3ए

2ए

11 ए

10 ए

9 ए 2

9ए 1 0

0 02

8 ए 2

8 ए । 0

3ए3

3ए ।

04 90

2बी

2ए

4बी

4ए

03 90 3सी

04 20

3बी

3ए

3सी

3बी

00 40

3ए

59 8642

THE GAZIETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 20 : 1 / AGRAHAYANΝΑ 5 , 1933

2बी2 0

60 39. सेंबंगुडी

40. पेरुम्पन्नैयूर

03 20

0 12

6बी

4बी

3बी

11 30

2बी

4ए

38. नेव्कुप्पै

3ए

0 05

2ए

00 40

05 60

4बी 0

0 06

4ए

13 50

11 60

0 18 20

0 06 15

02 25

00 40

3बी

131

0 01 40. पेरुम्पन्नैयूर

131

0 11 20

131

08 40

131

04 00

0 11

131

09 80

131

0 05

132

41. सेंगालिपुरम

132

07 00

132

09 00

53. सिमिलि

0 03

132

04 30

0 00

132

2सी2

132 2बी

04 00

132

01 80

2ए

6बी 0 04

133

[ PT1-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 2

6 6सो

133

05 25

133

5ए

40 5

133

00 4

133

15 20 119

09 90 119

।।बी

12 60 119

119

10सो

0 06

10बी

119

0 03 65 119

0 04 50 10ए

119

0 07 60 74

0 25 20 73

0 25 55 72

0 54 40 7

0 10 60 9

0 03 30 2बी 0 00 40

2ए

0 09 00 1

11 00 26060707070681

0 00 40

07 00

03 70 81

80 9

12 00 7

12 30

70 81

0 04

307

21 30 ।ए

306

28 80 5

0 02 30

09 40 8

0 12 00 7

0 08 30 5

0 03 60 4

0 00 40 26

0 02 80

02 25 4

0 00 40 8643

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

0 17

53. सिमिलि

0 02

109

52. पुदुक्कुडी

5बी

5ए

0 01

6बी

0 00

6ए

0 00

0 03

3बी

0 10

3ए

0 08

2बी

0 07

0 01

0 04

0 10 00

3ए

149

0 06

149

10ए

149

0 05 40

149

0 02

6बी

149

6ए

0 05

149

5ए

00 90

149

0 03

149

0 01

149

106

5ए

52. पुदुक्कुडी

0 02

5बी

106

0 00

6बी

109

7बी

109

0 00 75

109

0 02

109

51. मंजक्कुडी

109

0 00

109

0 03 35

109

.0 02

109

4182 GI / 11-14

0 00

110

111

0 12 10 10

111

0. 01

4सी

111

65 4बी 0 00

111

0 03.

195

1बी

00 90

195

1ए

3बी

195

0 04 30 195

3ए

0 03

18बी

194

0 004 80 18सी

194

0 04: 40 194

18ए

0 08 00 14

194

0 04 00 194

12बी

03 00 194

194

0 00 80 194

6सी

0 03

6बी

194

0 04

194

6ए

0 08

194

00 80 3

200

0 00 40 200

09 20

24बी

185

02 20 27

185

10 40

185

00 40

185

0 03

186

02 80

6सी

187

02 20 6बी 0

187

0 02 20 187

6ए

10 00 4

187

0 11 20 2बी

187

18 40

7बी

180

00 40 3

153

0 07 70 2

153

12 65

153

1बी

12 60

153

1ए

166 8644

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1 166

51. मंजक्कुडी

0 05 40 50. अरसूर 166

0 19 90

165

3बी 0 04

165

3ए

00 80

165

0 00 40 73. उत्तिरंगुडी 156

0 10 80

156

15 20

156

0 00 40

160

0 01

3ए

160

0 05 30

161

0 35 70

162

0 06 00

162

0 05 30

123

2बी 0 08 00

123

2ए

0 02 20

125

2बी 0 01 50

125

0 04

2ए

124

0 21 30

0 15 65

0 13 80

0 12 90

0 11

0 07 60

0 03 50

2बी 0 09 75

0 07 95

2ए

0 16

1 ए

0 10 00

104

50. अरसूर

104

0 08 75

104

0 04 30

102

0 25 20

102

10 50

101

0 08 90

101

0 01

101

0 00 40

101

0 00 40

101

0 00 50

101

0 15 40

100

2बी 0

00 40 74. इलैयूर

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii )] 2

6 100

0 15 40 100

0 14 40 99

0 08 15 99

1ए

1बी 10 0 03 60 64

0 01 30 64

1बी9 0 05 25 64

1बी8 0 05

10 64

1बी7 0 09

55 64

1बी5 0 08 65 64

0 04 20 64

04 60 64

0 06 30 64

1बी2

04 80 64

1बी। 0 06 00 11

0 08 10 11

4बी 0 04 00 11

4ए

03 80 11

3बी 0 05 40 11

3ए

04 00 11

0 03 00 11

0 03 45 10

2बी 0 06 05 10

05 25 10

2ए।

05 10 15

9बी 0 05 60 15

0 06 20 15

0 13 70 6

0 00 80 14

12 80 14

0 11 00 14

0 14 10 6

0 10 50 18

502

15 50 18

5ए।

07 60 18

0 07 60 18

0 01 00 19

0 01 15 19

0 06 20 144

2बी 0 09 80 8645 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

144

75. तिरुक्कलंबूर

74. इलैयूर

0 06 70

0 01

144

2ए

00 40

0 05

143

0 10

143

0 02 00

0 24

146

0 29

131

जिला : तिरुवारूर राज्य: तमिलनाडु

तालुका: वंलगैमान

0 14

128

क्षेत्रफल

गांव का नाम

सर्वेक्षण सं. उप- खण्ड

खण्ड सं.

सं. हेक्टेयर एयर 76. सेल्लूर

वर्ग मीटर 1

14 30

08 15

6 25

179

64. सारनत्तम

06 00

14बी

146

05 10

146

14ए

0 08

4बी

146

4ए

146

0 01

146

02 10

2बी

0 90

146

06 90

2ए

0 80

146

0 02

146

0 04

0 05

146

0 01

3ए

147

3बी

148

03 80

148

15. तिरुक्कलंबूर

09 90

148

03 55

149

0 00

1 ए

00 40

149

0 04 55

149

5ए

149

5बी

0 10 00

0 04 39

149

4ए

0 04 65

149

2बी

0 00

0 03 80

149

बी

0 06

0 03 30

151

5बी

2बी

0 01 95

151

4बी

06 90

2ए

151

2सी

3 70

151

2ए

0 22

27 20

269

27 80

10 90

270

06 90

0 11

270

18 8646

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2011/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1 271

64. सारनत्तम

2सी

55. पुन्नैयिरुप्पु 271

4 00

2ए

273

1बी 0

6 70 273

6 80

1ए

274

0 08 40 56. रघुनादपुरम 274

0 08 40

275 2बी

08 50 275

0 09 00

2ए

275

0 09 00 438

0 00 40

438

0 06

2बी

438

0 03 10 438

0 03

2ए

441

0 00

441

3सी

0 00

441

3बी

0 00

441

3 ए

441

15 437

436

2बी

436

0 00 65

2ए

436

00 50 446

4सी 0 00 80

446

4बी

01 50 446

0 02

4ए

40 446

0 03

0 446

0 02 30 447

0 02 40

5ए

447

4बी 0 05 80 447

4ए

04 40

0 08

447

10 451

0 17

0 8

0 28

55. पुन्नैयिरुप्पु

0 02 40 7

0 03 90

0 26 00

0 10 30 21

06 00

[PART II-SEC .3(ii)] 2

6 21

2बी 0 06 50 21

2ए

0 15 20 24

08 30 178

3बी 0 08 20 178

0 14 00 3ए

161

0 00 80 181

181

0 09 00 181

0 08 30 184

2सी 0 06 B0 184

2बी

05 40

184

2ए

B5 185

1बी

00 185

50 1 ए

150

4बी

0 15 30 150

0 03 30 4ए

150

0 08 30 2

150

0 02 55

150

11 70 3बी

148

0 00

50 148

03 00 148

0 04 00 3ए

148

0 04 10 153

0 00 40

153

00 85 144

0 00 40 7

142

55 142

0 02 50

142

60 142

142

0 05 00 142

2बी

08 00 142

0 02 15 2ए

142

03 60 2

211

0 04 50 211

1बी 0 08 10 211

ए

13 50 212

10 70 212

0 03 25 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

भाग 11- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

10 50

213

8647

0 11

148

45. नारतांगुडी

36 रघुनाद‌पुरम

06 40

213

2ए

0 00

213

217

0 08 60

09 70

1बी

05 25

1ए

0 01

1बी

।ए

3बी

3ए

0 22

17 50

184

54. पुलवनत्तम

0 13

184

187

0 01

183

199

10 80

199

04 30

1बी

199

1 ए

200

52. तेनकुवलवेली

201

03 80

247

0 04

249

0 07 40

249

।बी

0 08

249

।ए

2सी

250

2बी

250

2ए

250

08 20

250

252

261

0 02

148

45. नारतांगुडी

0 14 40 3

149

150

18 60

123

0 02

121

00 40 4

115

0 13

115

10 00

115

0 07

114

163

30 3

163

09 80

163

0 04 50 163

0 17

166

0 00 40 169

167

1ए

0 14

। बी

167

0 01

168

0 06

198

0 06

198

12 20 199

0 08 20 200

08 70

207

0 12

206

2बी

05 20

2ए

03 50

2बी

0 02 70 1जी

09 20 1

06 60

1 इ

1 एफ

00 40

1डी

0 00

बी

1ए

0 06 00 1सी

0 05 40 1डी

54 8648

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] 1

6 56

0 07 30

4. चित्तमल्लि मेलपादी

154

0 15 30 तालुका : नीडामंगलम जिला : तिरुवारूर राज्य : तमिलनाडु

153

0 10 00 गांव का नाम सर्वेक्षण सं. उप- खण्ड क्षेत्रफल

153

0 01 50 खण्ड सं. सं. हेक्टेयर एयर

153

वर्ग

0 09 20

मीटर

140

0 07 80 1

141

0 16 60

120

0 2

08 00 3. पन्निमंगलम्

0 01 80

0 01 60 2

0 15 50

100

0 13 2

20 15

0 03 60

110

14 40 2

0 08 72

111

0 17 30 2

0 08 50

114

0 06 2. नगर

80 344

8ए

06 00

109

2ए

07 20 344

7बी 0 02 20

1बी 0 06 00 344

7ए

1सी 0 00 60 327

2सी 0 08 50

1सी 0 00 95 327

2बी 0 04 50

1डी 0 14 70 196

4. चित्तमल्लि मेलपादी

0 04 90

।बी 0 08 70 196

0 05 75

0 194

2ए

01 5

00 0 00 40

195

2सी 0

40 195

0 11

2डी 0 00 60 203

0 02 00

0 07 20 204

0 00 40

7. आदनूर

1ए

01 40 204

0 13 00

0 02 40 204

00 80

0 05 00 174

12. 90

0 06 00 175

0 02 00 176

0 07 20

0 04 10 4

177

0 00 40 177

3सी8 0 11 65

8 ए

0 02 50 177

3सी6

0 05 30 177

3सी7 0

0 07 25

0 179

00 1

02 40

0 159

07 2

05 60

0 159

06 25 0 18 00

0 2

158

00 40 0 01

12ए 20 00 158

40 1

0 12 40

160

12ए । 0

295

156

0 01 0

50 2ए।

0 155

116ए

05 00 0

2ए।

116ए

01 70 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

8649 2

40 12

0 02

1.कोविलवेन्नि

09 00

116ए

7. आदनूर

0 01 20

116ए

0 00

116ए

02 15

116बी

0 04 00

116बी

125

0 23

125

0 01 20

125

9ए

0 10

126

05 00

11 00

126

0 01 60

127 ए

127बी

0 01 85

127बी 3

127बी

0 10

127बी

128

8बी2बी 0

0 00 40

128

13बी2 0

0 08 10

129

16ए।

0 01

129

16ए2

0 08

129

0 02 00

129

479

1. कोविलवेन्नि

14 40

479

0 06 40

479

00 40

479

08 50,

479

0 05 90

481ए 11

0 06 00

481 ए

0 01

481ए 13

481 ए

0 00 40 481बी 5ए।

0 04

483बी

10बी 0

50 482बी

0 07

482बी 10ए

482बी

10 482बी

0 03 60 482बी 4डी

482बी 4सी

0 00

482बी 4बी

0 00 40 482बी 4ए

70 482बी

16 50 454सी 13

01 80 14

454सी

10 454सी 10

18 40 454सी

3सी

02 10 454सी 7

07 60

454सी 6सी

30 454सी 6ए

02 60 4सी

455बी

0 03 40 455बी 4ए

0 33 60 2

455बी

0 04 80 455बी 1

50 5

0 11

445बी

445बी 1

04 00 459

0 02 20 1

459

12 00 460बी

0 09 00 3

460बी

0 10 30 2

461बी

0 09 10 430बी 2सी

08 70 430बी 2बी 0

0 04 .80 430बी 2ए

429बी 11

04 90

429बी 10

00 8

429बी

09 60

429बी ।बी 8650

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

0 06 1. कोविलवेन्नि

429ए/बी 12

0 06 50

429ए/बी 11 बी

0 05 30

429ए/बी ४ए

429ए/बी 8बी 0

0 08 00

433बी/बी 8

10 0 02

433बी/बी

0 04

433बी/बी 7

433बी/बी 9

04 30

0 02 60

433ए 14

433ए 9

0 02 20

433ए

433ए 11

0 01 30

433ए 10

433ए 6

418बी

3ए

0 03 30

418बी 2ए

0 02 80

418बी । ए

0 03 50

418ए 6ए

0 20 00

418ए 1ए

419

2बी 0 23 90

419

1बी

0 09

[ फा.सं. आर-25011/25/2011-ओआर -1 ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011 S.O. 3385. Whereas , it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum products from Cauvery Basin Refinery, Narimanam to Trichy in the State of Tamil Nadu , a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited , for implementing the CBR - Trichy pipeline Project; I

And Whereas , it appears that for the purpose of laying such pipeline , it is necessary to acquire the Right ofUser in the Land described in the Schedule annexed to thisnotification;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub - section ( I) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act 1962 (50 of 1962) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the Right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may within twenty- one days from the date on which the copies of this notification , as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public ,

PART 11- SEC. ( ii)

object in writing to the acquisition of the Right of User therein, or laying of pipeline under the land to Shri B. Baskaran , Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, ATF, CBPL & CBRT pipeline Project . No. 10 , Thru- vi -ka Street , Rajajipuram , Tiruvallur . Tamil Nadu - 602001.

SCHEDULE

State : Tamil Nadu

Taluk: Tiruvarur District : Tiruvarur

Area Survey No.

Name of the Village

Hectare Are Square Sub Division No.

Meter 1

6 2

328

()

4/2. Kurumberi

329

(六) 3

()

329

8) 505

()

504

75 326

326

()

326

(0 05

50 326

() 00

326

() 00

08 326

326

50 503

(0) 01

40 333

333

80 333

333

0 07

00 333

0 01

10 499

2A3

05 20 499

0 00

40 499

2A4

0 02 60 4A

499

0 03 20 499

0 01 20 499

0 00

498

0 02 00 498

(0 02 60 497

0 03

497

0 07

497

(0 02

0 00

0 05 8651 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II--खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

5 4

28 10 496

0 06

4/2. Kurumberi

3.Vaippur

0 01

60 0 05

496

27 0

496

0 10

496

IBI

0 0 12

496

05 60

340

00 0 03

340

133

0 0 19

340

134

494

140

0 09

494

142

0 08

494

173

0 07

494

174

0 0 00

350

174

09 0 04

350

175

0 0 10

349

176

349

176

0 01

349

176

349

177

349

177

0 00

0 22

178

4. Tiruvadurai- mangalam

State : Tamil Nadu

Taluk : Nannilam District : Tiruvarur

Sub-

Survey

0 03

No. Division Hectare

Name ofthe

Village

0 13

Area Are Square Meter

No.

0 09

0 11

66. Sorakkudi

0 05

0 29

0 07

0 46

0 09 60

0 15 20

0 08

IF2

IFI

0 0 00

2A3

1C2

2A2

ICI

0 0 08

2A1

0 18

0 00 40

109

65.Mungikkudi

0 07

3A2

109

0 10 00

3A1

109

0 04

101

0 03

40 3.Vaippur

101

0 21

101

0 00

101

4182 Gl/11-15 8652

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1 1

63. Kuvalaikal 100

65.Mungikkudi

100

0 04

03 20

0 02 90

03 00

0 03

0 03 00

0 28

0 12 20

1A2

05 80

1A1

0 12

0 27

0 26

0 12

40 64. Mulangudi

0 03

0 05

0 02

05 40

00 40

1B2

0 17

IBI

02 00

0 30

63. Kuvalaikal

08 00

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] 2

6 15

0 05 60 15

04 80 7B

0 09

20 7

0 04 40 6

02 80 16

0 05

00 2

0 01

40 4

09 30 2

0 11

60 17

15 60

0 07

00 7

0 04 30 7

04 20 7

0 05

00 7

0 04

20 7

0 03 80 6

40 5

0 09

09 40 5

40 1

0 05

75 99

0 00

65 98

0 06

15 98

70 98

0 10 40 98

0 04

70 4

00 2

80 97

55 97

0 01

50 91

40 7

50 4B

0 04

05 10 2

0 10

40 91

0 00

40 1

0 01

20 90

12B

07 90 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

12A

0 09

57. Tattatimulai 82

64.Mulangudi

11B2 0 04

11A

0 00

07 00

0 07

0 08

0 07

0 08

0 07

0 01

0 06

0 01

0 03

0 00

188

57. Tattatimulai

0 01

188

10A

0 03

187

0 04

186

184

0 14 30

184

5A4

183

0 02

5A3

183

5A2

183

5A1

183

0 20

183

0 09

35.

183

8653

0 05

30 182

11A

182

0 01

10A

182

0 01

40 11A

110

0 05

00 110

0 07

110

0 10

110

0 08

110

0 06

70 110

0 01

60 2B

110

0 02

50 110

0 08

20 9

108

0 05

75 7

108

0 04

10 6

108

04 00 11

107

65 6

0 03

107

0 09

107

0 11

20 5A

0 09 20 4A

40 3A

10 54

5A2

85 5A1

50 4A

0 06

40 1A2

0 08

1A1

15 6A

0 04

03 80 51

3A2

0 03

80 3A1

40 2A

0 07

10A

95 7

0 01

6B1

49 8654

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC . B ( ii) ]

6 2

04 49

6B2

0 01

57. Tattatimulai

58. Keerangudi

06 50 6A

70、

-06

0 3A

2A2

0 05

0 19 30 0

2A1

0 07

40 49

0 05

45 47

0 05 40 47

0 17 00

30 0 02

0 21 ICI

57. Deepankudi

1B1

40 0

06 47

35 7

0 02 90

09 46

0 04

60 6A

00 0 04

24 5A

75 0

0 05

0 14 40

11 80

0 46

39. Sembangudi

03 90

3A3

State : Tamil Nadu

Taluk: Kudavasal District : Tiruvarur

3A2

Area

0 03

3A1

80 Survey No.

Hectare Are Square

Name of the Village

Sub Division No.

Meter

04 90 4

0 1

0 06 40 0

10A2

58. Keerangudi

04 80

10A1

0 05

0 0

08 0 02 45

30 4A

90 0 01

0 00

40 0

0 03 80

11A

2B2

0 03 0

10A

2B1

9A2

12 0

9A'

0 02

60 0

8A2

0 06

50 0

8A1

11 42

09 50 0 00

38.Neikuppai

60 0

0 05

(0 02

3A 8655 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

25 0 00

38. Neikuppai

40. Perump-

0 2

annaiyur

0 4B

03 4A

13 50

0 00

40 60

00 0 11

0 2

00 0 18

0 09

00 0 06 15

0 00

40 0 02

0 00

0 5

70 0 00

0 03 3B

00 0 01

80 10

131

0 11

12 8

131

40. Perump- annaiyur

0 00

30 9

131

80 0 08

0 00 7

131

0 00

70 6

131

0 11

0 04

131

60 0 04

131

307

41. Sengalipuram

0 09

28 2

131

306

30 0 05

02 10

132

53. Simili

132

0 0

132

30 0

0 08

132

0 03 60 0

132

0 00 5

132

80 0

0 02 4

132

0 2C2

132

00 0

0 132

17 0

132

90 0 04

06 6B

() 133

20 0

133

0 6A

133

40 0 17

0 01 5

133

0 00

80 4

133

00 0

0 133

40 0

00 12

119

0 0

11B

119

11A

119

0 06

10C

119

0 03

10B

119

07 50

0 04

10A

119

0 07

0 01

119

74 8656

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1 44

53. Simili

52. Pudugudi 45

149

0 14

149

10A

0 06

149

0 03

149

0 05 40

149

0 02

149

0 02

149

0 00 90

149

0 03

149

106

0 04 40

52.Pudugudi

106

109

0 00

109

0 07

109

75 51.Manjakudi 109

109

0 03 35

109

0 02 50

109

0 05

109

0 02

110

0 00

110

111

0 01

111

195

0 03

195

0 00 90

195

0 00 40

195

04 30

18B

194

03 20

18C

194

0 00

18A

0 04

194

12B

0 04

194

[PART II-SEC. 3 (it)] 2

6 194

0 01 20 194

0 00 80 194

0 03 60 194

0 04

194

0 08 70 3

200

0 00 80 1

200

00 40 185

24B

0 09 20 185

20 27

0 02

185

0 00 40 186

0 03 20 187

187

20 6A

187

0 10

187

0 11

180

153

0 00 40 153

153

65 153

60 1A

166

0 05

166

05 40 166

0 19 90 165

0 04 80 165

00 80 165

0 00 40 156

0 10 80 156

156

40 160

0 01

70 160

0 05 30 4

0 35

161

70 162

0 06 00 162

0 05

30 123

123

0 02 20 125

0 01

50 125

10 124

0 21

30 6

15 65 8657 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

73. Uthirangudi

51. Manjakudi

0 06

0 12 90

0 05

2A2

0 05

2A1

0 05

0 06

0 00

0 13

0 07

0 11

0 15

104

50. Arasur

0 08

104

5A2

0 04 30

104

5A1

102

0 07

102

0 01

101

0 01

101

06 20

101

144

0 00

74. Ilaiyur

101

144

0 00

101

0 01

144

101

0 05

143

100

143

0 15

100

0 24

146

100

131

0 08

128

0 01

60 76. Sellur

0 03

1B10

73. Uthirangudi

0 14

1B9

1B8

0 06

JB7

0 05

1B5

0 04

0 07

0 01

0 04

1B2

0 06

1B1

0 08

0 11

11 8658

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

75. Thirukalambur 36

0 06 00 41

0 34

0 00

40 38

0 05

70 4403333

0 00 80 39

0 04 50

0 10 00 39

20 25

0 00

40 24

0 06

20 24

0 09

80 24

90 24

0 12

10 23

90 19

0 27 80 82

0 06

90 18

0 11

00 15

0 03

20 13

0 06

70 13

00 13

0 11 20 13

0 02 Taluk :Valangaiman District : Tiruvarur State :

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii)] 1

6 64. Saranattham

149

0 03

149

00 40 149

0 04 55 149

0 00

55 149

0 04

50 149

0 04

65 149

0 03 80 151

0 03 30 151

95 151

0 40 151

70 269

0 27 20 270

0 10

270

40 271

50 271

00 273

70 273

6 80 274

0 08 40 274

0 08

40 275

0 08

50 275

0 09

00 275

0 09

Tamil Nadu

Area Survey No.

Nameofthe Village

Sub No.

Division Hectare Are Square Meter 1

5 179

64. Saranattham

25 146

14B

0 01

50 146

14A

0 01

00 146

40 146

70 146

20 146

0 90 146

80 146

0 02

90 146

02 146

0 05

80 147

0 01

00 148

0 03 95

148

0 03 80 148

0 00

65 148

0 09

90 438

0 00

40 438

0 02

0 438

0 06

10 438

0 03

10 438

03 441

0 00

75 441

0 00 40 441

0 00

40 441

00 40 441

01 437

0 08

0 436

0 00 75 436

0 00 65 436

0 00 50 446

0 00 80 446

0 01 50 446

02 446

0 03 446

0 02 447

02 40 8659 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 /अग्रहायण 5, 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

6 3

00 4B

142

64. Saranattham 447

56.Ragunatha-

0 04

447

142

puram

08 10

03 60

142

447

50 2

451

0 04

211

0 08

211

55. Punayiruppu 8

0 00

0 13

211

0 12

212

10 0 03 90

25 2

212

03 0 26 00

0 10 50 2

213

0 06 4

213

0 06 00

80 21

0 00

213

0 06

06 00

0 2B

217

0 08 2A

58. Papakudi

0 15 20

0 09 70

0 08

0 02 1

25 0 08

0 05 3B

178

56.Ragunatha-

0 14

0 3A

23 178

puram

0 00 80

0 161

0 181

0 09

14 3

181

00 2C

184

00 0

184

40 0 11

0 09 2A

184

22 IB

185

0 08

185

184

54. Pulavanattam

13 0

150

184

0 03

150

187

01 0

0 3

150

183

0 02

150

199

0 0 11

10 150

199

30 0

0 04 3B

148

199

00 0

0 09

148

199

50 0 04

0 3A

14 148

200

0 32 1

148

201

0 2

247

153

70 0

0 03

153

247

0 07

144

247

0 0

04 142

249

0 0 02 50

142

249

0 0

249

142

03 4

250

0 0

142

250

142

4182 Gl/11-16 8660

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ]

6 4

4 1

5 3

52. Tenkuvalaveli 54

0 04

54. Pulavanattam 250

0 0

250

0 06 00 250

0 08

05 252

0 07

30 261

0 14

148

45. Narattangudi

Taluk:Needamangalam District : Tiruvarur State: Tamil Nadu 148

Survey No.

0 14 40

149

Name of the Village

Sub Division Hectare No.

Area Are Square Meter 0

150

6 0

123

18 60

121

3. Pannimangalam 2

115

15 2

115

0 03

60 3

115

0 08

72 0

115

0 08

50 1

114

344

2.Nagar

0 08

163

344

02 163

0 03

344

0 09

163

327

0 08 50 5

163

327

0 04 50 166

196

0 04 90 0

169

196

4. Chittamalli Melpadi

167

194

00 167

195

08 168

195

11 198

0 06

203

02 2

0 06

198

204

0 00

199

204

0 13

00 0

200

08 20

204

0 00

80 0

207

174

12 206

0 12

175

05 40 206

176

0 07 20 1

206

177

00 2B

0 02 50

52. Tenkuvalaveli 23

177

3C8

0 11 34

0 10 50

177

3C6

00 40

177

3C7

0 02 60 2B

0 03

179

02 0

159

0 05 60 49

0 09 20

159

18 2

0 06

158

01 55 0 07

158

12 40 0

12 60

160

15 50 0 00

2A1

156

12 40 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 1

155

2A1

8661

40 116A1

7. Adanur

4. Chittamalli

0 15

154

Melpadi

153

0 09 20

153

140

141

0 08

120

0 13

100

110

111

114

0 07

109

0 06

0 00

0 14

7. Adanur

1. Kovilvenni

0 00

12A2 0

12A1

0 01

295

116A6

116A1 1

0 09

116A1

15 116B

0 04

00 116B

0 10

60 116B

0 09 90 116B

0 07

00 125

10 125

0 01

20 9A

125

126

50 11

0 05

00 126

0 11

00 126

127A1

0 01

65 127B

127B

95 127B

02.

65 127B

128

60 128

0 04

128

50 8B2B

128

40 128

0 01

13B2

128

16A1

129

0 01

16A2

129

70 129

0 07

129

80 12

0 02

00 129

479

40 479

50 479

30 479

10 6

479

0 05

90 481A1 1

0 06 00 0

481A1

0 00

40 481B 5A1

483B

13 50 482B

10B

0 07

482B

10A 8662

[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

6 1

482B

0 03

1. Kovilvenni

429B

1. Kovilvenni

0 482B

429A/B 12

30 0

482B

429A/B 11B

482B

429A/B 8A

05 0 00

482B 4B

0 02

429A/B 8B

482B 4A

0 08

433B/B 8

00 5

482B

0 09

433B/B 10

16 50

454C 13

433B/B

50 0

454C

433B/B 9

30 0 05

454C

433A1

02 3C

454C

433A9

0 04 0

454C

02 10

433A1

0 02 0

454C 6C

433A1

454C

433A1

0 02

455B

433A6

12 0

455P 4A

418B

12 455B

418B

0 03

455B

418B

02 0

445B

418A6

50 1

0 00

445B

418A1 A

20 00 2

459

0 04

419

90 459

419

10 4

460B

[ F. No. R-25011 /25 /2011 - OR - I ] LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

460B

0 10

461B

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2011 0

430B

430B 28

08 70

430B

429B

0 04

429B 10

का. आ. 3386. केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि गुजरात राज्य में सलाया से उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में मथुरा तक पेट्रोलियम क्रूड के परिवहन के लिए " सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन के अन्तर्गत डी- बॉटलनेकिंग परियोजना" के कार्यान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

429B

0 04 00

429B

और केन्द्रीय सरकार को उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उक्त भूमि में, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णित है , उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप- धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको , भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनसाधारण को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री एम जी परमार , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ( गुजरात ) , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) प्लाट नं. 10 , पटेल सोसाइटी , ( आई. ओ. सी. कालोनी के पास ) विरमगाम ( जिला अहमदाबाद ) गुजरात -382 150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

अनुसूची

जिला : बनासकांठा

राज्य : गुजरात

सर्वे नं. /

क्षेत्रफल तहसील गांव का नाम

ब्लाक नं.

एयर वर्ग

हेक्टेयर

मीटर (1)

(2)

(3)

(5) (6)

(4)

वडगाम

18 66 तेनीवाडा

00 00 06

178 177

[ फा. सं. आर -25011/26/2011 - ओआर- I ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव New Delhi , the 16th November , 2011 S.O. 3386.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government , that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum crude a pipeline from Salaya in the State of Gujarat to Mathura in the State of Uttar Pradesh . ( Under Salaya- Mathura Pipeline De- bottlenecking Project ) should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

8663

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act , as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri M G Parmar, Competent Authority (Gujarat ) Indian Oil Corporation Limited , ( Pipeline Division) Plot No. 10 , Patel Society (Near IOC - Colony) Viramgam ( District - Ahmadabad) Gujarat- 382150 .

SCHEDULE

District : Banaskantha

State : Gujarat Name of

Area Tehsil

Survey No./

Village

Block No. Hect- Are Square Metre

are

(2)

(4)

( 1)

(3)

(5) ( 6) Wadgam Teniwada

178 177

00 00

18 66 00 06

[F. No. R- 25011 / 26/ 2011 - OR - I ] LALCHHANDAMA , Under Secy .

नई दिल्ली, 16 नवम्बर , 2011

का. आ. 3387, केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हिंत में यह आवश्यक है कि गुजरात राज्य में सलाया से उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में मथुरा तक पेट्रोलियम क्रूड के परिवहन के लिए " सलाया - मथुरा पाइपलाइन के अन्तर्गत डी - बॉटलनेकिंग परियोजना " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

8664

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II- SEC . 3 ( ii) ]

onwhich the copies of this notification issued under sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public , object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri M G Parmar, Competent Authority (Gujarat ) Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Pipeline Division) Plot No. 10 , Patel Society (Near IOC -Colony) Viramgam ( District - Ahmadabad) Gujarat-382150 .

SCHEDULE

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनसाधारण को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री एम जी परमार , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ( गुजरात ) , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , ( पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) प्लाट नं. 10 , पटेल सोसाइटी , ( आई. ओ. सी. कालोनी के पास ) विरमगाम ( जिला अहमदाबाद ) गुजरात -382 150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

District : Mehsana

State: Gujarat अनुसूची

Tehsil Name of

Area

Survey No./

जला : महेसाणा

राज्य : गुजरात

Village

Block No.

ग्राम का नाम सर्वे नं./

क्षेत्रफल

हसील

Hect- Are are

Square Metre ब्लाक नं. हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग

(2)

(4)

(1)

(3)

(5) ( 6)

मीटर

00 21

Unjha Dabhi

(2)

(3)

(4) (5) ( 6)

240 220

15 70

02 29 डाभी

240

Road 00 00

Asphalted

न्झा

160

07 90 220

00 15

00 02 29

सड़क

160

00 07 90

[ F. No. R - 25011 /28 / 2011 - OR. - IJ LAL CHHANDAMA , Under Secy.

[ फा. सं. आर-25011/ 28/2011-ओआर - I ]

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव

नई दिल्ली , 22 नवम्बर , 2011 New Delhi , the 16th November, 2011

S.O. 3387.- Whereas , it appears to the Central overnment, that it is necessary in the public interest that orthe transportation of petroleum crude a pipeline from alaya in the State of Gujarat to Mathura in the State of ttar Pradesh: ( Under Salaya- Mathura Pipeline De- ottlenecking Project) should be laid by the Indian Oil orporation Limited ;

का. आ . 3388.-केन्द्रीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि गुजरात राज्य में सलाया से उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य में मथुरा तक पेट्रोलियम क्रूड के परिवहन के लिए " सलाया- मथुरा पाइपलाइन के अन्तर्गत डी - बॉटलनेकिंग परियोजना " के कार्यान्वयन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा एक पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए ;

And , whereas , it appears to the Central overnment that for the purpose of laying the said peline , it is necessary to acquire the right of user in e land under which the said pipeline is proposed to laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed this notification ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred sub- section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and inerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in nd) Act , 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government reby declares its intention to acquire the right of er therein;

अतः , अब , केन्द्रीय सरकार , पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स ( भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन ) अधिनियम , 1962 ( 1962 का 50 ) की धारा 3 की उप - धारा ( 1 ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए , उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;

Any person interested in the land described in the d schedule may, within twenty one days from the date 8665 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

bottlenecking Project ) should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited:

And , whereas , it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline . it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid . and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification :

कोई व्यक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वर्णित भूमि से हितबद्ध है , उस तारीख से जिसको , भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनसाधारण को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने या भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में श्री एम जी परमार , सक्षम प्राधिकारी ( गुजरात ) , इंडियन ऑयल कॉर्पोरेशन लिमिटेड , (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग ) प्लाट नं. 10 , पटेल सोसाइटी , ( आई. ओ. सी. कालोनी के पास ) विरमगाम ( जिला अहमदाबाद ) गुजरात -382 150 को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सकेगा ।

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub - section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines ( Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962 ) , the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein :

अनुसूची

जिला : पाटन

राज्य : गुजरात

क्षेत्रफल

ग्राम का. नाम सर्वे नं./

तहसील

ब्लाक नं. हेक्टेयर एयर वर्ग

मीटर

(3)

(4)

(6)

(2)

(5)

(1)

00 03 11

चानसमा

569

सुनसार

Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may , within twenty one day's from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub . section ( 1 ) of Section 3 of the said Act . as published in the Gazette of India , are made available to the general public object in writing to the acquisition of the right of use: therein or laying of the pipeline under the land , to Shri M G Parmar, Competent Authority ( Gujarat ) Indian Oi Corporation Limited , ( Pipeline Division ) Plot No. 10 , Pate Society (Near IOC - Colony ) Viramgam ( District - Ahmadabad Gujarat-382150.

570

00 09

SCHEDULE

00 09

561

564

00 06 35

District : Patan

State: Gujarat

02 07

सड़क

Name of

Area

Tehsil

545

09 01

Survey No./ Block No. Hect- Are

Village

544

00 18

Squar Metr

are

2827

00 22

धिनौज

चानसमा

(4)

(2)

(5) ( 6

(3)

( 1)

00 03

सड़क

Sunsar 569

03 11

Chanasma

2837

570

09 14

2838

561

00 09

06 35

564

00 00 08 63

कानेसरा

232/1

सिद्धपुर

Road

232

00 12

545

09 01

231/1

00 01

18 T

544

231

2827

22 53

Chanasma Dhinoj

03 6.

Mettel Road

00 05

234

2837

23 00 17 08

1133

सेन्दराना

2838

13 सिद्धपुर

00 07

नाला

08 6

Kanesara

Sidhpur

00 14 81

1129

232/1 232

12 6

231/1

01 6:

[ फा. सं. आर-25011 /27/2011- ओआर- 1 ]

01 3:

लालछन्दमा , अवर सचिव

231 234

New Delhi , the 22nd November , 2011

17 0

Sendrana 1133

Sidhpur

14 8

Nala 1129

[F. No. R - 25011 /27 /2011 - OR LALCHHANDAMA , Under Se S.O. 3388.- Whereas , it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum crude a pipeline from Salaya in the State of Gujarat to Mathura in the State of Uttar Pradesh . ( Under Salaya - Mathura Pipeline De- 8666

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANΑ 5 , 1933

श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशालय

धनबाद , 21 अक्तूबर, 2011

का आ 3389.-मैं , सतीश पुरी , मुख्य खान निरीक्षक जिसे खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक के रूप में भी पदनामित किया गया है, खान अधिनियम 1952 के धारा 6 की उप - धारा 3 के तहत प्रदत्त शक्तियों तथा दिनांक 15.11.2009 के भारत के राजपत्र के भाग- II , सेक्शन 3 , सब- सेक्शन ( ii ) में प्रकाशित दिनांक 06.11.2009 के एस ०ओ० 3177 का आंशिक संशोधन करते हुए एतद् द्वारा घोषित करता हूं कि खान अधिनियम , 1952 की सेक्शन -5 की सेक्शन 1 के उप- सेक्शन-1 के तहत नियुक्त निरीक्षक अपने क्षेत्राधिकार के सम्बद्ध जोन , क्षेत्र एवं उप-क्षेत्र में अपनी शक्तियों का प्रयोग संलग्न " परिशिष्ट में दिए गए निर्देशानुसार करेंगे ।

परिशिष्ट

दक्षिणी जोन जिनका मुख्यालय बेंगालुरू ( कर्नाटक ) होगा तथा इसके साथ बेंगालुरू क्षेत्र , बेल्लारी क्षेत्र तथा चेन्नई क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे ।

बेंगालूरू क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय बेंगालुरू राज्य-कर्नाटक

कर्नाटक राज्य

शिमोगा , उडीपी , चिकमंगलूर , दक्षिण कन्नड़ , चित्रादुर्गा , तुमकूर , हसन , कोलार , बेंगलुरू, मंडवा, मैसूर , चामराज नगर, कोडागु, रामनगर तथा चिकबल्लापुर जिले के सभी खदान ।

तमिलनाडु राज्य

कृष्णागिरी जिले के सभी खदान । केरल राज्य

सभी खदान

लक्ष्यद्वीप आईलैण्ड केन्द्र सभी खदान

शासित प्रदेश

बेल्लारी क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय बेल्लारी राज्य-कर्नाटक

आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य कुरनूल तथा अनन्तपुर जिले के सभी खदान ।

कर्नाटक राज्य

रायचूर , कोप्पल, बेल्लारी , गुलबर्गा , यादगिर , देवनगेरे , बागलकोट, हावेरी तथा गढ़ग जिले के सभी खदान । चेन्नई क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय चेन्नई

राज्य- तमिलनाडु

[ PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य चित्तूर जिले के सभी खदान । तमिलनाडु राज्य

कांचीपुरम , थिरूवारूर , वेल्लौर, तिरूवन्नामलाइ, सेलम , इरोड़, कोयम्बटूर, निलगिरी , विल्लूपुरम , कुड्‌डालोर, अरियालुर, पेरमबालूर, तिरूच्चिरापल्ली, पुदुकोटई, शिवगंगा , मदुरई, डिंडीगुल, करूर , थेनी , विरूदुनगर, टूटीकोरीन, तिरूनेलवेली , कन्याकुमारी , तिरूवाल्लूर, तंजौर, नागापट्टीनम , रामानाथापुरम , तिरूपुर, धर्मापुरी , नमक्कल एवं चेन्नई जिले के सभी खदान । पुड्डुचेरी केन्द्र शासित प्रदेश सभी खदान ।

दक्षिणी मध्य जोन जिनका मुख्यालय हैदराबाद ( आंध प्र प्रदेश ) होगा तथा इसके साथ हैदराबाद क्षेत्र संख्या-1 , हैदराबाद क्षेत्र संख्या -2 , तथा गोवा क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे । हैदराबाद क्षेत्र सं०-1 , राज्य-आंध्र प्रदेश मुख्यालय हैदराबाद

आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य करीम नगर , वारांगल , खम्मन , कृष्णा , पश्चिम गोदावरी , पूर्व गोदावरी , विशाखापत्तनम , विजयानगरम तथा श्रीकाकुलम जिले के सभी खदान ।

मुख्यालय हैदराबाद हैदराबाद क्षेत्र सं०-2 , राज्य-आंध्र प्रदेश

(नेल्लौर उप- क्षेत्र भी शामिल)

आंध्र प्रदेश राज्य अदिलाबाद, निजामाबाद , मेढक , रंगा रेड्डी, हैदराबाद , नलगोंडा , महबूब नगर , गुंदुर, प्रकासम, कड़प्पा तथा नेल्लौर जिले के सभी खदान । कर्नाटक राज्य

बिदर जिले के सभी खदान । नेल्लौर उप- क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय नेल्लौर राज्य- आंध्र प्रदेश

आन्ध्र प्रदेश राज्य गुंटुर, प्रकासम, कड़प्पा तथा नेल्लौर जिले के सभी खदान । गोवा क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय मड़गांव राज्य-गोवा

सभी खदान

गोवा राज्य

कर्नाटक राज्य

बीजापुर , बेलगाम , धारवाड़ तथा उत्तर कन्नड़ जिले के सभी खदान । महाराष्ट्र राज्य

थाने , अहमदनगर, रायगढ़ , मुम्बई, पुणे , सतारा , रत्नागिरी , सोलापुर, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

सांगली, कोल्हापुर तथा सिन्धुगढ़ जिले के सभी खदान । उत्तरी जोन, जिसका मुख्यालय गाजियाबाद ( उत्तर प्रदेश ) होगा, तथा इसके साथ गाजियाबाद क्षेत्र , अजमेर क्षेत्र, ग्वालियर क्षेत्र तथा वाराणसी क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे । गाजियाबाद क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय गाजियाबाद

राज्य-उत्तर प्रदेश

खदान

जम्मू एवं कश्मीर राज्य सभी

सभी खदान

हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य

पंजाब राज्य

सभी खदान

हरियाणा राज्य

सभी खदान चंडिगढ़, केन्द्र शासित प्रदेश

उत्तराखण्ड राज्य

सभी खदान

दिल्ली राज्य

राजस्थान राज्य

सभी खदान अलवर एवं भरतपुर जिले में ।

उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य मुजफ्फरनगर, सहारनपुर , बिजनौर, मेरठ, बागपत, गाजियाबाद, बुलन्दशहर, जौतिबाफुले नगर, मुरादाबाद, रामपुर, अलिगढ़, बदौन , बरेली, पिलीभित, मथुरा , हाथरस , ऐटा , शाहजहांपुर , लखिमपुर, आगरा , फिरोजाबाद, मैनपुरी, फर्रुखाबाद, हरदोई, सीतापुर , इटावा, कन्नौज, औरिया, कानपुर, ग्रामीण कानपुर, उन्नाव एवं लखनऊ जिले के सभी खदान ।

अजमेर क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय अजमेर

राज्य-राजस्थान

राजस्थान राज्य

श्रीगंगानगर, बीकानेर, जैसलमेर, बाड़मेर, जोधपुर, नागौर, चुरू, हनुमानगढ़, झुंझुनु , सीकर, पाली, भिलवाड़ा, अजमेर, जयपुर, दौसा , सवाईमाध् गेपुर, टोंक तथा बुन्दी जिले के सभी खदान ।

ग्वालियर क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय ग्वालियर

राज्य- मध्य प्रदेश

राजस्थान राज्य

कोय , बरन , करौली, धौलपुर तथा झालवार जिले के सभी खदान । मध्य प्रदेश राज्य मोरेना , शिवपुर , भिंड, ग्वालियर, शिवपुरी , गुना, भोपाल , विदिशा, 4182 GI/ 11-17

8667

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

दतिया, राजगढ़ , टिकमगढ़ तथा छत्तरपुर तथा अशोक नगर जिले के सभी खदान ।

उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य जलौन, झांसी, ललितपुर, हमीरपुर तथा महोबा जिले के सभी खदान । वाराणसी क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय वाराणसी

राज्य- उत्तर प्रदेश

उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य बहराईच , श्रावस्ति, बाराबंकी , गोंडा, रायबरेली, फतेहपुर, बांदा, चित्रकूट, कौशंभी, प्रतापगढ़, सुलतानपुर, फैजाबाद, बस्ती, बलरामपुर , सिद्धार्थ नगर, महाराजगंज, सन्त कबीर नगर, अम्बेडकर नगर, जौनपुर, इलाहाबाद, कुशीनगर, देवरीया, गोरखपुर, आजमगढ़, मऊ, बलिया, सन्त रविदास नगर, वाराणसी, मिर्जापुर, चन्दौली एवं सोनभद्रा, गाजीपुर एवं छत्रपति साहुजी महाराज नगर जिले के सभी खदान । मध्य प्रदेश राज्य सीधी एवं सिंगरौली जिले के सभी खदान ।

उत्तरी पश्चिमी जोन जिनका मुख्यालय उदयपुर ( राजस्थान) होगा तथा इसके साथ अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र, उदयपुर क्षेत्र तथा सूरत क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे ।

अहमदाबाद क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय अहमदाबाद

राज्य-गुजरात

गुजरात राज्य

कच्छ, पाटन, जामनगर , पोरबन्दर, राजकोट, जुनागढ़ , अमरेली, भावनगर, सुरेन्द्र नगर, अहमदाबाद, आनन्द, खेड़ा, गांधी नगर तथा मेहसाना जिले के सभी खदान ।

दीव के सभी खदान । दमन , दीव, दादरा एवं नागर हवेली के केन्द्र शासित प्रदेश

उदयपुर क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय उदयपुर

राज्य-राजस्थान

राजस्थान राज्य

जालोर , सिरोही, राजसमंद, उदयपुर, डूंगरपुर, चित्तौरगढ़, प्रतापगढ़, बांसवाड़ा जिले के सभी खदान । मध्य प्रदेश राज्य नीमच , मंदसौर, रतलाम, उज्जैन , शाझापुर, देवास तथा इन्दौर जिले के सभी खदान । 8668

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

गुजरात राज्य

बनामकंथा तथा साबरकंथा जिले के सभी खदान।

सूरत क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय सूरत

राज्य-गुजरात

गुजरात राज्य

पंचमहल, दाहोद, बड़ोदरा , भरूच, नर्मदा, सूरत , नवसरी , तापी , वलसाड़ तथा डंगस जिले के सभी खदान । मध्य प्रदेश राज्य झबुआ, धार, पश्चिम निमार, पूर्व निमार तथा बदवानी जिले के सभी खदान ।

महाराष्ट्र राज्य

नंदूरबार, ढुले, नासिक तथा जलगांव जिले के सभी खदान । दमन, दीव, दादरा एवं सभी खदान दमन, दादरा तथा नागर हवेली

नागर हवेली के केन्द्र में ।

शासित प्रदेश

पश्चिमी जोन जिनका मुख्यालय नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र) होगा तथा इसके साथ नागपुर, क्षेत्र संख्या-1, नागपुर क्षेत्र संख्या-2, जबलपुर क्षेत्र तथा बिलासपुर क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे । नागपुर क्षेत्र सं०-1, मुख्यालय नागपुर राज्य- महाराष्ट्र ( परासिया उप - क्षेत्र भी शामिल )

मध्य प्रदेश राज्य बेतुल, छिंदवाड़ा, सिवनी तथा बालाघाट जिले में ।

महाराष्ट्र राज्य

सभी खदान अकोला, अमरावती, वर्धा, नागपुर, भंडारा तथा गोंदिया जिले के सभी खदान । परासिया उप - क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय परासिया

राज्य-मध्य प्रदेश

मध्य प्रदेश राज्य

छिंदवाड़ा जिले के सभी खदान । नागपुर क्षेत्र सं०-2, मुख्यालय नागपुर

राज्य- महाराष्ट्र

महाराष्ट्र राज्य

बुलदाना, वासीम , यवतमाल, चन्द्रपुर, गढ़चिरौली , औरंगाबाद, जालना, हींगोली, बीढ, परबनी , नांदेड़, ओसमानाबाद तथा लातूर जिलू के सभी खदान । जबलपुर क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय जबलपुर

राज्य- मध्य प्रदेश

मध्य प्रदेश राज्य रीवा, सतना, पन्ना, दमोह, कटनी , उमरीया , सहडोल, अनुपपुर, सागर, जबलपुर, मंडला , डिन्डोरी , रायसेन ,

[PART II-SEC 3 ( ii ) ]

नरसिंगपुर, सिहोर, होशंगाबाद तथा हरदा जिले के सभी खदान । बिलासपुर क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय बिलासपुर राज्य- छत्तीसगढ़

छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य

कोरिया , कोरबा, बिलासपुर, कावर्धा, राजनन्दगांव , दुर्ग , रायपुर, धमतरी कनकेल, बस्तर तथा दांतेवाड़ा जिले के सभी खदान ।

दक्षिणी पूर्वी जोन जिनका मुख्यालय रांची ( झारखण्ड) होगा तथा इसके साथ रांची क्षेत्र, चाईबासा क्षेत्र, रायगढ़ क्षेत्र तथा भुवनेश्वर क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे ।

रांची क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय रांची

राज्य-झारखण्ड

गढ़वा, पलामू, चतरा , लातेहार , लोहरदगा, गुमला, खुंटी , सिमडेगा , रांची, रामगढ़ एवं हजारीबाग जिले के सभी खदान ।

(रामगढ़ उप- क्षेत्र भी शामिल)

झारखण्ड राज्य

रामगढ़ तथा हजारीबाग जिले के सभी खदान ।

चाईबासा, क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय चाईबासा राज्य-झारखण्ड

झारखण्ड राज्य

पूर्वी सिंहभूम, पश्चिमी सिंहभूम तथा सरायकेला खरसावान जिले के सभी खदान ।

उड़ीसा राज्य

सुन्दरगढ़, मयुरभंज तथा कौयंझर (आनन्दपुर डिविजन शामिल ) जिले के सभी खदान ।

रायगढ़ क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय रायगढ़ राज्य- छत्तीसगढ़

छत्तीसगढ़ राज्य

रायगढ़ , जशपुर , सरगुजा, जांजगीर तथा महासमन्द जिले के सभी खदान ।

भुवनेश्वर क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय भवुनेश्वर राज्य-उड़ीसा

उड़ीसा राज्य

झारसुगुड़ा , संबलपुर, देवघर, अंगूल, धेनकनाल, जाजपुर, कोयंझर ( आनन्दपुर डिविजन केवल ) , भद्रक , बालेश्वर, केन्द्रापारा , जगतसिंहपुर , कटक, खुरदा, पुरी, नायागढ़ , बौध, बरगढ़ , सोनेपुर, नुआपारा, बोलंगीर, फुलबानी , गंजम, गाजापटी, रायगड़ा, कालाहांडी, नवरंगपुर, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

कोरापुट तथा मलकानगिरि जिले के सभी खदान ।

पूर्वी जोन जिनका मुख्यालय सीतारामपुर ( पश्चिम बंगाल ) होगा तथा इसके साथ सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या -1 , सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या-2 , सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या-3 तथा गुवाहाटी क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे ।

सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या-1, मुख्यालय सीतारामपुर राज्य- पश्चिम बंगाल

8669

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

दक्षिण स्थित वर्दवान जिले के सभी खानें ।

पाण्डेश्वर घाट से हरिपुर, करीमनगर , जमुरिया तथा दरबरदंगा जानेवाली सड़क से सीमांकित वर्दवान जिला के सभी खानें ।

गुवाहाटी क्षेत्र , मुख्यालय गुवाहाटी

राज्य-असम

झारखण्ड राज्य

जामताड़ा तथा दुमका जिले के सभी खदान ।

पश्चिम बंगाल

असम राज्य

सभी खदान

अरूणाचल प्रदेश राज्य सभी खदान

सभी खदान

मणीपुर राज्य

मिजोरम राज्य

सभी खदान

मेघालय राज्य

सभी खदान

नागालैण्ड राज्य

सभी खदान

त्रिपुरा राज्य

सभी खदान वर्दवान जिला जो जी०टी० रोड के दक्षिण में स्थित है के अन्तर्गत आते हैं और ये पूर्व में बर्नपुर जानेवाली जी०टी ० रोड तथा पश्चिम में नियामतपुर, राध् ॥नगर तथा चिनाकुरी घाट रोड द्वारा सीमांकित हैं । वर्दवान जिले में स्थित सभी खदान दक्षिण में स्थिन जी०टी० रोड जो अंडाल से होते हुए खंडरा, ओखरा , हरिपुर, कुष्णानगर , जमुरिया तथा चन्नामोड़ पर गुजरनेवाले जी०टी० रोड से जाकर मिल जाती है, द्वारा घिरा हुआ है ।

सभी खदान

सिक्किम राज्य

पूर्वी बंगाल राज्य जलपाईगुड़ी, उत्तर दिनाजपुर, दार्जिलिंग , कूचबिहार , दक्षिण दिनाजपुर तथा मालदा जिला स्थित सभी खानें । बिहार राज्य

सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या- II , मुख्यालय सीतारामपुर राज्य- पश्चिम बंगाल

पश्चिम बंगाल

सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र सं०-1 एवं सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र सं०- III , के तहत आनेवाले खदानों को छोड़कर वर्दवान जिला स्थित सभी खदान ।

पुरूलिया, बांकुड़ा, बीरभूम, मुर्शिदाबाद , नाडिया, उत्तर 24 परगना , दक्षिण 24 परगना , हावड़ा , हुगली एवं मेदनीपुर जिला स्थित सभी खदान । अंडमान एवं निकोबार सभी खदान ।

द्वीप समूह

केन्द्र शासित प्रदेश

सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र संख्या- III, मुख्यालय सीतारामपुर राज्य- पश्चिम बंगाल

झारखण्ड राज्य

गोड्डा, देवघर , पाकुड़ तथा साहेबगंज जिले के सभी खदान ।

पश्चिम बंगाल

सीतारामपुर क्षेत्र सं०-1 में स्थित खानों को छोड़कर जी०टी ० रोड के

असम राज्य के तेल क्षेत्र से राज्य स्थित तेल शोधन कारखानें स्थित तेल पाइप लाईन एवं इसे प्रस्थापन । मध्य जोन जिसका मुख्यालय धनबाद ( झारखण्ड) होगा तथा इसके साथ धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या -1 , धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या- II , धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या III तथा कोडरमा क्षेत्र समाविष्ट होंगे ।

धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या-1 , मुख्यालय धनबाद राज्य-झारखण्ड

झारखण्ड राज्य

धनबाद जिला के सभी खानें वैसे क्षेत्र में स्थित है जो राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ 32 द्वारा पूर्वी एवं दक्षिणी किनारे पर गोविन्दपुर से महुदा मोड़ तक , पश्चिमी किनारे तक राजगंज महुदा मोड़ एवं उत्तरी किनारे पर गोविन्दपुर तथा राजगंज के बीच राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ 2 द्वारा सीमांकित है ।

धनबाद जिले के सभी खार्ने कारी जोर द्वारा सीमांकित है जो बुर्रागढ़ एवं पुटकी के बीच चलनेवाले 8670

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2011/AGRAHAYANA 5,1933

सड़क मार्ग तथा राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ 32 द्वारा जुड़ी हुई है ।

धनबाद जिला के सभी खानें राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ 2 के उत्तर तथा गिरीडीह- टुण्डी- गोविन्दपुर मार्ग के पश्चिम में स्थित है ।

धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या- II , मुख्यालय धनबाद राज्य-झारखण्ड

State ofKarnataka

झारखण्ड राज्य

गिरीडीह- टुण्डी-गोविन्दपुर सड़क मार्ग एवं धनबाद- झरिया-जियलगोड़ा -मोहालबनी मार्ग के पूर्व में स्थित धनबाद जिला के सभी खदान । धनबाद क्षेत्र संख्या- III , मुख्यालय धनबाद राज्य-झारखण्ड

State of Tamilnadu

झारखण्ड राज्य

State of Kerala

धनबाद क्षेत्र सं० एवं धनबाद क्षेत्र सं०- II के तहत आनेवाले खानों को छोड़कर धनबाद जिला के सभी खदान ।

UT of Lakshadweep Islands कोडरमा क्षेत्र, मुख्यालय कोडरमा राज्य-झारखण्ड

सभी खदान

बिहार राज्य

State of Karnataka

झारखण्ड राज्य

अभी खदान कोडरमा तथा गिरीडीह जिले में ।

हीरक रिंग रोड के पश्चिम एवं राष्ट्रीय उच्च पथ 32 के पश्चिम तथा चास- चन्दनक्यारी - रंगनाथपुर सड़क मार्ग के दक्षिण स्थित बोकारो जिला के सभी खानें ।

State ofTamilnadu

[सं० एस० 29022/1/2011 - सामान्य/2959] सतीश पुरी, मुख्य खान निरीक्षक एवं खान सुरक्षा महानिदेशक MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT Directorate General of Mines Safety Dhanbad , the 21st October , 2011

Union Territory of Puduchhery

S.O. 3389 .--I , Satish Puri . Chief Inspector of Mines and also designated as Director- General of Mines Satety, under the powers conferred on me under sub- section 3 of Section 6 of the Mines Act , 1952 , and in parial modification ofS.O. No. 3177 dated 6.11.2009 (S - 29022/ 1 /2009 - Genl . 3423 ) , published in Part - II , Section 3 , Sub- Section ( ii) ofthe Gazette of India dated 15.11.2009, hereby declare the areas ofthejurisdiction of zones , regions with respect of which inspectors appointed under Sub-section 1 of Section- ! of

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ]

Section 5 of the Mines Act, 1952 shall exercise their respective powers , as given in the ' Appendix ' enclosed. APPENDIX

Southern Zone with Headquarters at Bengaluru (Karnataka) comprising of Bengaluru Region , Bellary Region and Chennai Region .

Bengaluru Region , HQ at Bengaluru in the State of Karnataka All mines in the districts of Shimoga, Udipi Chikmagalur , Dakshin Kannad , Chitradurga , Tumkur , Hassan , Kolar , Bengaluru Urban , Bengaluru Rural , Mandya , Mysore , Chamarajnagar , Kodagu , Ramanagara & Chickaballapur.

A Mines in the district of Krisk.agiri .

All Mines

AilMines

Bellary Region HQ at Bellas in the State of Karnataka

State ofAndhra Pradesh All Mires in the districts of Kurnool & Anantapur.

All Mines in the districts of Raichur , Koppal , Bellary , Gulbarga, Yadgir, Davengere , Bagalkot, Haveri & Gadag .

Chennai Region, HQ at Chennai in the State of Tamilnadu

State of Andhra Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Chittoor.

All Mines in the districts of Kanchipuram, Thiruvarur , Vellore, Tiruvannamalai , Salem, Erode , Coimbatore , Nilgiris , Villupuram, Cuddalore , Ariyalur , Perambalur , Tiruchirapalli , Pudukottai , Sivaganga , Madurai , Dindigul, Karur, Theni , Virudhnagar , Tuticorin, Tirunelveli , Kanyakumari , Thiruvallur , Thanjavur , Nagapattinam , Ramanathapuram , Thirrupur , Dharmapuri , Namakkal & Chennai .

AllMines .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

South Central Zone with Headquarters at Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh ) comprising of Hyderabad Region 1 , Hyderabad Region 2 , and Goa Region .

Hyderabad Region No. 1 , HQ at Hyderabad in the State of Andhra Pradesh

State of Andhra Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Karimnagar , Warangal , Khammam , Krishna , West Godavari , East Godavari , Visakhapatnam , Vizianagaram & Srikakulam

Hyderabad Region No. 2 , HQ at Hyderabad in the State of Andhra Pradesh , ( including Nellore Sub Region ) State of Andhra Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Adilabad , Nizamabad , Medak , Rangareddy , Hyderabad , Nalgonda , Mahboobnagar , Guntur , Prakasam , Cuddappah &Nellore

State of Karnataka

All Mines in the districts of Bidar

Nellore Sub Region , HQ at Nellore in the State of Andhra Pradesh

State of Andhra Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Guntur , Prakasam , Cuddappah &Nellore

Goa Region , HQ at Madgaon in the State of Goa State ofGoa

AllMines

State of Karnataka

All Mines in the districts of Bijapur, Belgaum , Dharwad , & Uttar Kannad

State of Maharashtra All Mines in the districts of Thane , Ahmadnagar, Raigarh , Mumbai , Pune , Satara , Ratnagiri , Solapur , Sangli , Kolhapur , & Sindhudurg North Zone with Headqarters at Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh ) comprising of Ghaziabad Region , Gwalior Region , and Varanasi Region

Gaziabad Region , HQ at Gaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh

All Mines

State of J & K

State of Himachal Pradesh All Mines

All Mines

State of Punjab

All Mines

State of Haryana

All Mines

Union Territory of Chandigarh

8671

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

All Mines

State of Uttarakhand

Union Territory ofDelhi All Mines

State of Rajasthan

All Mines in the districts of Alwar & Bharatpur State of Uttar Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Muzaffarnagar , Saharanpur , Bijnaur , Meerut , Baghpat , Gaziabad , Bulandshahar , Jautibaphule Nagar, Moradabad , Rampur, Aligarh , Badaun , Bareli , Pilibhit , Mathura , Hathras , Etah , Shahjahanpur, Lakhimpur , Agra , Firozabad , Mainpuri , Farukhabad , Hardoi , Sitapur , Etawa , Kannauj , Auriya , Kanpur , Rural Kanpur , Unnao , & Lucknow

Ajmer Region , HQ at Ajmer in the State of Rajasthan State of Rajasthan

All Mines in the districts of Sriganganagar , Bikaner , Jaisalmer , Barmer , Jodhpur , Nagaur , Churu , Hanumangarh , Jhunjhunu , Sikar , Pali, Bhilwara , Ajmer, Jaipur , Dausa , Sawaimadhopur, Tonk & Bundi Gwalior Region , HQ at Gwalior in the State of Madhya Pradesh

State of Rajasthan

All Mines in the districts of Kota , Baran , Karauli , Dhaulpur , & Jhalawar

State of Madhya Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Morena , Sheopur , Bhind , Gwalior , Shivpuri , Guna , Bhopal , Vidisha , Datia , Rajgarh , Tikamgarh , Chattarpur & Ashok Nagar

State of Uttar Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Jalaun , Jhansi , Lalitpur , Hamirpur & Mahoba Varanasi Region , HQ at Varanasi in the State of Uttar Pradesh

State of Uttar Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Bharaich , Shravasti , Barabanki , Gonda , Raibareily , Fatehpur , Banda , Chitrakoot , Kaushambhi , Pratapgarh , Sultanpur , Faizabad , Basti , Balrampur , Sidartha Nagar , Maharajganj , Sant Kabeer 8672

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 ; 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ]

Diu, Dadra &Nagar Haveli Nagar Haveli .

Western Zonewith Headquarters at Nagpur (Maharashtra ) comprising ofNagpur Region 1 , Nagpur Region 2, Jabalpur Region , and Bilaspur Region

Nagpur Region No. 1 , HQ at Nagpur in the State of Maharashtra (including Parasia Sub Region )

State ofMadhya Pradesh

Nagar, Ambedkar Nagar , Jaunpur, Allahabad , Kushinagar, Deoria , Gorakhpur , Azamgarh , Mau , Ballia , Sant Ravidas Nagar , Varanasi , Mirzapur, Chandouli, Sonebhadra , Gazipur & Chatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Nagar

All Mines in the districts of Betul , Chindwara , Seoni & Balaghat State of Madhya Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Sidhi , Singrauli

State of Maharashtra All Mines in the districts of Akola , Amravati , Wardha , Nagpur, Bhandara & Gondia North Western Zone with Headquarters at Udaipur (Rajasthan) comprising of Ahmedabad Region , Udaipur Region , and Surat Region

Parasia Sub Region HQ at Parasia in the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ahmedabad Region , HQ at Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat

State of Madhya Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Chindwara State of Gujarat

Nagpur Region No. 2 , HQ at Nagpur in the State of Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra

All Mines in the districts of Kutch , Patan , Jamnagar , Porbandar, Rajkot , Junagarh, Amreli, Bhavnagar, Ahmedabad , Anand , Kheda, Gandhinagar , Mehsana & Surendra Nagar

UnionTerritory of Daman , All Mines in Diu Diu , Dadra & Nagar Haveli

All Mines in the districts of Buldana , Washim , Yavatmal , Chandrapur , Garhchiroli , Aurangabad , Jalna , Hingoli , Beed, Parbhani , Nanded , Osmanabad & Latur Udaipur Region, HQ at Udaipur in the State ofRajasthan

Jabalpur Region, HQ at Jabalpur in the State of Madhya Pradesh

State of Rajasthan

State of Madhya Pradesh

All Mines in the districts of Jalor , Sirohi , Rajsamand , Udaipur, Dungarpur, Chittorgarh , Pratapgarh & Banswara

State of Madhya Pradesh

All Mines in the districts of Rewa, Satna, Panna , Damoh , Katni , Umaria , Shahdol , Anuppur. Sagar, Jabalpur , Mandla, Dindori , Raisen , Narsingpur. Hoshangabad & Harda Sihore.

All Mines in thedistricts of Neemach , Mandsaur , Ratlam , Ujjain , Shajapur, Dewas & Indore.

Bilaspur Region , IIQ at Bilaspur in the State of Chhattisgarh

StateofGujarat

All Mines in the districts of Banaskantha & Sabarkantha .

State of Chhattisgarh

Surat Region , HQ at Surat , in the State of Gujarat

State ofGujarat

All Mines in the districts of Korea . Korba , Bilaspur , Kawardha . Rajnandgaon , Durg, Raipur. Dhamtari , Kanker, Bastar & Dantewada All Mines in the districts of Panchmahal , Dahod , Vadodra . Bharuch , Narmada , Surat , Navsari , Tapi , Valsad & Dangs .

State ofMadhya Pradesh All Mines in the districts of Jhabua , Dhar , West Nimar, East Nimar& Badwani .

South Eastern Zone with Headquarters at Ranchi (Jharkhand) comprising of Ranchi Region , Chaibasa Region , Raigash Region and Bhubaneswar Region, Ranchi Region , IHQ at Ranchi in the State of Jharkhand ( including Ramgarh Sub Region )

State of Maharashtra

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Nandurbar , Dhule , Nasilk & Jalgaon.

All Mines in the districts of Garhwa , Palamu , Chatra , Latchar . Lohardaga , Gumla , Khunti , Simdega. Ranchi , UnionTerritory of Daman, All Mines in Daman , Dadra & [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Ramgarh & Hazaribagh .

Ramgarh Sub Region , HQ at Ramgarh in the State of Jharkhand

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Ramgarh & Hazaribagh .

Chaibasa , HQ at Chaibasa in the State of Jharkhand State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of East Singhbhum , West Singhbhum & Saraikela Kharsawan

State of Orissa

All Mines in the districts of Sundergarh , Mayurbhanj & Keonjhar excluding Anandpur Division .

Raigarh Region , HQ at Raigarh in the State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh All Mines in the districts of Raigarh , Jashpur Nagar , Surguja , Janjgir Mahasamand . & Bhubaneswar Region , HQ at Bhubaneswar in the State of Orissa

State of Orissa

All Mines in the districts of Jharsuguda , Sambalpur , Deoghar , Angul, Dhenkanal , Jajpur , Keonjhar ( Anandpur Division only ) , Bhadrak , Baleswar , Kendrapara , Jagatsinghpur, Cuttak, Khurda, Puri , Nayagarh , Boudh , Bargarh , Sonepur, Nuapara , Bolangir, Phulbani , Ganjam , Gajapati , Rayagada , Kalahandi , Navrangpur , Koraput & Malkangiri .

Eastern Zone with Headquarters at Sitarampur (W.B. ) comprising of Sitarampur Region 1 , Sitarampur Region 11 , Sitarampur Region III , and Guwahati Region Sitarampur Region I , HQ at Sitarampur in the State of WestBengal

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Jamtara & Dumka

State of West Bengal All Mines in the districts of Burdwan situated south ofGT Road and bounded by Burnpur Road leading from GT Road on the East & Neamatpur , Radhanagar & Chinakuri Ghat Road on the West . All mines in

8673

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

the District of Burdwan situated in the area bound by GT Road on the south , road leading from Andal turning on GT road to Khandra , Ukhra , Haripur, Krishnagaar , Jamuria & Chanda More on GT road.

Sitarampur Region II , HQ at Sitarampur in the State of West Bengal

State of West Bengal All Mines in the districts of Burdwan except those included in Sitarampur Region No. I & Sitarampur Region No. III

All Mines in the district of Purulia , Bankura , Birbhum , Murshidabad , Nadia , North 24 Parganas , South 24 Parganas , Howrah , Hoogli & Mednipur

All Mines

Union Territory of Andaman & Nicobar Islands

Sitarampur Region III , HQ at Sitarampur in the State of West Bengal

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Godda , Deoghar , Pakur & Sahebganj

State of West Bengal All Mines in the districts of Burdwan situated on the south of GT Road except those included in Sitarampur Region No. 1 .

All mines in the District of Burdwan bounded by road leading from Pandaveswar Ghat to Haripur , Krishnanagar , Jamuria & Darbardanga Guwahati Region , HQ at Guwahati in the State ofAssam State of Assam

AllMines

State of Arunachal Pradesh

All Mines

State of Manipur

State of Mizoram

All Mines

State of Meghalaya

AllMines

State of Nagaland

All Mines

State ofTripura

All Mines

State of Sikkim

All Mines in the districts of State of West Bengal 8674

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

Jalpaiguri , Uttar Dinajpur, Darjeeling , Cooch Bihar , DakshinDinajpur, & Malda State ofBihar

Oilpipeline and its installations extending fromOil fields in the State ofAssam up to refineries situated in the State Central Zone with Headquarters at Dhanbad (Jharkhand) comprising of Dhanbad Region I , Dhanbad Region II, Dhanbad Region III , and Koderma Region

DhanbadRegion I, HQ at Dhanbad in the State ofJharkhand State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the district of Dhanbad lying in the area bound by NH 32 starting at Gobindpur upto MohudaMore on eastern and southern sides , Rajganj -Mohuda More road on the Western Side and , NH 2 between Gobindpur and Rajganj on the northern side,

All Mines in the district of Dhabad lying in the area bound by Kari Jore, road connecting Buragarh & Pootki and NH 32

All Mines in the district of Dhanbad lying in the area north ofNH 2 and west of Giridih- Tundi-Gobindpur road.

Dhanbad Region II , HQ at Dhanbad in the State of Jharkhand

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Dhanbad lying east ofGiridih- Tundi-Gobindpur road and lying east of Dhanbad- Jharia-Jealgora-Mohulbani Road.

Dhanbad Region II , HQ at Dhanbad in the State of Jharkhand

State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Dhanbad except those included in Dhanbad Region No. I and Dhanbad Region No. II

All Mines in the district of Bokaro except those included inKoderma Region .

Koderma Region , HQ at Koderma in the State of Jharkhand

State ofBihar

AllMines

[PART II SEC . 3 (ii) ] State of Jharkhand

All Mines in the districts of Koderma & Giridih

All mines situated in the district ofBokaro lying west of Hirak Ring road and all mines lying west ofNH 32 & south of Chas Chandankyari- Rangnathpur Road

[No. S-29022/1 /2011 -Genl/2959] General ofMines Safety. Satish Puri , Chief Inspector of Mines & Director-

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011 काआ- 3390.-औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2003 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31-10-2011 प्राप्त हुआ था।

[फाइल संख्या . L12012/140/2003- आई.आर. ( बी-1) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

NewDelhi , 31st October, 2011 S.O.3390.-.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 37/2003 of the Cent . Govt. Indus . Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure , in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 31/10/2011 .

[No. 1-12012/ 140/2003 - IR(B-I) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

Annexure

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR PRESENT:

Shri J. Srivastava,

Presiding Officer, C.GI.T. - cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO.37/2003 DateofPassing Award - 20th October , 2011 BETWEEN:

1. TheAsst . General Manager , State Bank of India , Region - II , Zonal Office, [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

Berhampur ( Ganjam) , Orissa .

2. The Chief General Manager , State Bank of India , Jawaharlal Nehru Marg , Bhubaneswar .

3. The Branch Manager , State Bank of India , Berhampur Bazar Branch , Berhampur,

(Ganjam ) , Orissa .

1stParty - Managements .

AND

Their workman Shri B. Chandra Rao , Kumbhar Street , Berhampur -760002 , Dist . Ganjam , Orissa .

2nd Party -Workman .

APPEARANCES :

Smt . S. Swain , Manager , Law, SBI , Berhampur.

For the 1st Party- Managements.

None

Forthe 2nd Party- Workman

AWARD

TheGovernment of India in the Ministry of Labour vide their letter No. L- 12012/ 140/ 2003 - IR ( B - I ) , dated 21.11.2003 has referred the following dispute existing between the management of State Bank of India , Bhubaneswar and their workman in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.:-

"Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India in relation to their Berhampur Bazar Branch in terminating the service of Shri B. Chandra Rao w.e.f. 24.12.1996 even after rendering more than 14 years of service in the bank without following due procedure of law as required under Section - 25 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2. The 2nd Party - workman in pursuance of the order of reference has filed a very short statement of claim in which he has stated that he served as Messenger- cum- Sweeper in Berhampur Bazar Branch of State Bank of India from 1.1.1982 to 31.7.1988 for 221 days , from January, 1989 to March , 1994 for 1517 days and from 28.6.1996 to 24.12.1996 for 179 days . He also attended the interview on 26.4.1994 at Berhampur Zonal Office , but appointment was given to somebody else instead of him . He served for more than 240 days in a year . Hence request has been made to give him permanent job . He has also filed certain documents in the shape of xerox copies in support of his claim.

3.The 1st Party- Management in its written statement has replied that the relief claimed by the workman regarding permanent job is without jurisdiction and beyond the scope of the reference . The claim has been made after lapse of 4182 /11-18

8675

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

more than three years . Hence it is barred by limitation. The claimant was engaged intermittently as part time sweeper from 1.1.1982 to 31.7.1988 for 221 days . Subsequently he was engaged on daily basis . He has rendered 71 days work in 1994 and 64 days work in 1996. He has not completed 240 days continuous service in a year preceding the date of his disengagement . Therefore the question of illegal termination orcompliance of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act does not arise . Disengagement of daily wager cannot be construed as retrenchment . It is denied that the claimant has rendered continuous and uninterrupted service of 14 years in the Bank . He was offered an opportunity for regular appointment in view of various settlements made between All India State bank of India Employees Federation and Management of State Bank of India , but unfortunately he could not be appointed in view of his ranking in the interview . The panel of candidates prepared on the basis ofmarks obtained in the interview and the length of service lapsed on 31.3.1997 and therefore his services were discontinued. Now he has got no right to claim appointment in the Bank. The claimant along with some other candidates had filed a number of writ petitions before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa challenging the selection process and the panels , but the writ petitions were dismissed . S.L.P. was also filed in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by one Natabar Das but that was also dismissed . The disengagement of the claimant does not come under the definition of retrenchment as he has not worked continuously and uninterruptedly for 240 days preceding the date of his disengagement . Hence he is not entitled to any notice or compensation as per the provisions of Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947.

4. Inview of the aforesaid pleadings following issues were framed superseding the issues previously framed on 5.7.2007 .

ISSUES

1. Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India in relation to their Berhampur Bazar Branch in terminating the service of Shri B. Chandra Rao with effect from 24.12.1996 even after rendering more than 14 years of service in the Bank without following due procedure of law as required under section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 is legal and justified ?

2. Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ?

5. The 2nd Party - workman after filing his statement of claim did not take pain to prosecute his case and absented himself again and again on most of the dates despite sending notices to him through ordinary as well as registered post. Therefore the case was ordered to proceed exparte against the 2nd Party - workman on 3.1.2011 .

6. The 1st Party - Management has filed affidavit evidence of one Shri Hemant Kumar Mohanty , Branch 8676

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC 3 ( ii) ] Manager along with photostat copies of ten documents , which he has proved in his evidence , marked as Ext . - 1 to Ext.-10.

FINDINGS

ISSUE NO . 1

ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटीए/ 1232/2004 नया, आईटीसी सं० 23/2003 पुराना ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-2011 प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-12012/61/2003- आई आर (बी-2)] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , 31st October, 2011

S.O.3391.-.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. No. CGITA/ 1232/2004 New (ITC No. 23/2003 Old) ] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, AHMEDABAD now as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in the relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17-10-2011 .

[No. L- 12012/ 61 /2003-IR(B - II ) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, AHMEDABAD

PRESENT: Binay Kumar Sinha, PresidingOfficer , CGIT-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedbad, Dated 28-09-2011

Reference: CGITA of 1232 of 2004 New Reference: ITC. 23/2003 (Old)

ChiefManager,

7. As the 2nd party- workman has failed to contest the case and file any evidence in support of his claim , it is not proved that he has rendered 14 years of service in the bank. The 1st Party- Management has only admitted that the 2nd Party-workman has rendered 221 days of service during the period from 1.1.1982 to 31.7.1988 as a part time sweeper on casual or intermittent basis. Further it has been admitted that he rendered 71 days of service in the year 1994 and 64 days of service in the year 1996. Thus he has not completed 240 days of continuous service during a period of 12 months in a calendar year preceding the date ofhis disengagement. This fact has been substantiated in the affidavit evidence of Shri H.K. Mohanty, Branch ManagerofBerhampur Bazar Branch . His testimony stands uncontroverted and it cannot be disbelieved. Therefore the case of the 2nd Party- workman does not come within the purview of retrenchment and according due course of law as required to be followed under Section 25 - F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is not attracted to the present case. Since the 2nd Party- workman was a casual worker and he was not appointed in accordance with the rules of recruitment of the Bank he cannot claim re- appointment. The plea of the 1st Party- Management regarding giving him opportunity to appear in the interview for permanent appointment is foreign and irrelevant to the presentdispute anddoes not come within the scope of the Schedule of reference . Therefore it cannot be said that the action ofthe 1stParty-Management of State Bank of India, Berhampur BazarBranch interminating the services ofShri B. Chandra Rao, claimant with effect from 24.12.1996 is unjustified and illegal . The discontinuance of service of the 2nd Party- workman is fullyjustified and is not against the provisions ofSection-25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The issue is accordingly decided against the 2nd Party- workman.

Bank of India , P.B. No. 133 Rajkot Main Branch , MG Road, Rajkot-360001.

.....First Party ISSUE NO. 2

And their workman 8. Inview ofmy findings recorded in Issue No. 1 the 2nd Party-workman is not entitled to any reliefwhatsoever claimed

Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani , Rainaka Tower Road , Balchand Andher Street , Rajkot-360001.

..Second Party 9. Reference is answered accordingly.

Forthe first party Shri D.R. Chadhari , Advocate Dictated&Corrected byme.

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

For the second party Shri Hitesh D. Katharotiya, Advocate.

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

AWARD

का आ-3391 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक

Inview of Industrial Dispute existing between the employer in relation to Management of Bank of India and 8677 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

their workman Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani the Appropriate Government/Government of India/ Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi by its order No. L- 12012/ 61/2003- IR ( B - II ) dated 10.09.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication by this tribunal under section 10 Sub Section (1) clause ( d) and sub - section 2 (A) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 by formulating terms of reference as per the schedule which is as follows : -

THE SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India , Rajkot to deny employment to Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani is justified or legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled for and since when ? "

2. On registering of the case as Reference I.T.C. 23 / 2003. Parties were noticed and on receipt of notice the second party workman and also the management of first party appeared to contest this reference case . The second party workman filed his statement of claim at Ext . 5 and the first party Bank also filed its written statement at Ext . 10 .

according to seniority to get salary and permanency since the post of Sepoy is vacant. There are total 9 establishments including 1 Zonal and 8 sub branches of the first party Bank at Rajkot city. Further case is that as per the oral orders as well the written order of Chief Manager / Assistant Manager of the Bank, he was being entrusted duties in the main branch and 8 sub branches of the Bank . The record of presence/attendance , salary and duty of the workman was being kept in the main branch of Rajkot and the branch officers were sending the amount of salary for the duties performed in particular branch by Banker Cheque to the main branch and main branch was crediting the salary after debiting their " salary head " in the second party's Bank account No. 46203 , every month . Further case is that the second party salary was being paid from " Salary head " . The second party workman was in the list of approved Badli Sepoy panel in the first party Bank since 1986 and was only left to be confirmed. Further case is that the first party Bank has appointed permanently 15 Badli Sepoy who were working with the second party workman and those were junior to the second party workman and they were working on the 56 sanctioned post of Sepoy before 10.10.2002. Further case is that the vacant post of Sepoy is only field up by selecting candidates from Badli Sepoy panel approved by the Competent Authority of the first party. The first party Bank has never issued Identity Card, attendance card, pay slip etc. to the second party workman and other Badli Sepoys All scuh records were kept in respective branches and main branch of the first party Bank. On the date of 10.10.2002 the second party workman was only candidate from the list of approved Badli Sepoy panel who is left to be absorbed as a Sepoy in the Bank . Further case is that as per instruction of Head Office and Zonal Office , the manager of respective branch intentionally not allowed the second party workman to complete 240 days of work in the Bank and reduced allotment of work to him on the false pretence of non arising of leave vacancy in the Bank , the second party was terminated on 11.10.2002 without any fault of the second party and without following due process of law by issuing notice and without paying legal dues and neglecting provision of the ID Act 1947 , and also neglecting the recommendation of Desai award and Shastri award and also defying the provision of labour laws and so the action of terminating the second party is illegal , unfair , unjust and bad in law . On these grounds relief has been prayed for that the action of the first party in terminating the second party from 11.10.2002 be declared illegal and unjustified and that the second party be reinstated w.e. f. from 11.10.2002 with full back wages and with 12% interest and for also awarding cost of the case of Rs . 15,000/ - and for other reliefs to which the second party workman is found entitled .

4. The first party Bank in its written statement has pleaded inter - allia that the reference is illegal , improper and not tenable and the workman has no legal right , no 3. The case of the second party as per statement of claim, briefly stated , is that he had registered his name in the employment exchange at Rajkot . The first party Bank was to appoint permanent Badli Sepoy in their offices and branches at Rajkot . The second party workman was iligible for the post and so the employment exchange sent his name to the first party and the first party Bank sent interview letter on 25.06.1984 and he faced interview by the Appointment Authority of first party on 07.07.1984 and he was selected as Badli Sepoy and the list of Badli Sepoy panel was approved . He was entrusted with duty as Badli Sepoy since 14.03.1986 on which date he joined the service and appointment letter w.e.f. 14.03.1986 was issued on 24.11.1987 . During tenure of his work he performed duties in the post of peon , Safai Kamdar and Watchman in the first party Bank and discharged his duties honestly , regularly , faithfully and continuously from 14.03.1986 to 10.10.2002 . His past service record with the first party Bank is clean . His last month salary was Rs . 4433.75 / - ( Basic Rs . 2750+ DA Rs . 1395 + HRA Rs . 206 + CCA Rs . 82.50 Rs . 4433.75 / - ) as per the Bank's letter . Further case is that he worked continously since 14.03.1986 up to 10.10.2002 i.e. for 16 years 6 months and 27 days , in the service of first party Bank at Rajkot City . His working days in the first party Bank from 1987 to 2002 are as under: 1987-154 days , 1987-84 days , 1988-110 days , 1989-185 days , 1980-242 days , 1991-279 days , 1992-290 days , 1993-285 days , 1994-286 days , 1995-241 days , 1996-281 days , 1997- 254 days , 1998-297 days , 1999-290 days , 2000-308 days , 2001-338 days and 2002-215 days. It is the case of the second party workman that the Appointing Authority of the Bank has appointed him according to rules and regulations also as per the settlement policy, custom , usage to contains in Shastri award , orders , circulars of the Head Office of the first party. He ( second party workman ) was entitled 8678

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II SBC . 3 ( ii) ]

5. Following issues are taken for consideration and for determination in this case in view of the pleadings of the parties.

ISSUE

(1) Whether the reference is maintainable ?

( II) Whether the workman has got valid cause of action?

(III) Whether the second party workman was doing his casual work in continuity from date of his engagement till before his removal from thejob ?

(IV) Whether the second party workman has completed 240 days of work in every calendar year during his tenure of work in the department of first party?

(V) Whether the action of the management of the first party to deny employment to the workman is justified and legal ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled in this ca ?

(VI) To what other relief i . any the workman is entitled to in this case?

FINDINGS

6. ISSUE NO . III & IV

Both the second party workman and also first party management of Bank adduced oral and documentary evidence in support of respective cases . On behalf of the workman two witnesses were examined at Ext. 14 and 22 . The workman was examined and cross - examined at Ext . 14 . The second workman witness at Ext . 22 is Kiritbhai Anantrai Oza a retired staff of the Bank of India who is also Secretary ofBank of India Staff Union Saurashtra and Vice President of Bank of India Federation Besides the oral evidence documents have also been produced at Ext . 13 through list. Ext . 15 is the interview letter . Ext . 16 is the appointment letter. Ext . 17 is the Certificate of Chief Manager that workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani is working with the Bank as sub staff purely on daily wages basis since 14.03.1986 . Besides this large number of other documents vide Ext . 13/5 , 13/7 has been filed. Which are letter dated 31.05.2002 of Assistant General Manager regarding engaging Badli Sepoy, letter dated 22.01.2002 containing the factum about the workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani regarding his appointment w.e.f. 01.03.1986 also mentioning year wise breackup ofhis Badli Sepoy works from 1986 to 2001. Ext . 13/7 is the Xerox copy of the Saving Bank Account of the workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani Account No. 46203 of Bank of India . Ext. 18 and 19 are the original Savings Bank Account Passbook of the workman of Bank of India Account No. 46203 containing the entries of debit , credit and balance of the amount in his account up to 24.10.2003 At Ext . 24 the workman further filed documents as per list Ext . 24 with Annexure - A1 , Annexure -A2 and Annexure- valid cause of action and so the reference is not maintainable . The first party has denied the averments and allegation made against the Bank . It has been pleaded that para 1 and 2 of the statement of claim are misleading and not admitted and the workman is required to prove those averments . Regarding para 3 of the statement of claim it has been pleaded that it is false , baseless and misleading and not admitted by the first party and that it is not at all true thatjunior to the concern workman have been allowed to continue and it is also not true that from April - 2002 working days of the concern workman had been reduced and it is also not true that on 11.10.2002 by oral order , the workman had been terminated . It is also not true that the first party as per provision of ID Act has to maintain the seniority list for Badli Sepoy. It is also not true that the juniors to the concern workman have been made permanent by the first party . With regard to para 4 of statement of claim it has been stated that it is false , baseless and misleading that the concern workman ever worked for more than 240 days in a year . It has also been denied that the concern workman has been paid less salary being a Badli Sepoy and it has been also denied that any unfair labour practice was adopted against the concern workman . The first party has also denied the averments of the second party workman to para 5 to 8 of statement of claim . It has been stated that the concern workman is not entitled to be absorbed on permanent basis in the first party Bank . The first party has also denied para 5 to 10 of statement of claim of the second party . The case of the first party Bank is that the concern workman was selected on panel of temporary Badli Sepoy at Rajkot branch on 14.03.1986 on daily wages . Since the work requirement was not fixed at particular branch, concern workman was provided work depending upon availability of work at any of the 8 sub branches without having any permanent vacancy at any particular branch . The concern workman has tried to club his work at various branches in a misleading manner to show that he completed 240 days of work in calendar year . Further case is that the name of the second party workman was in a panel of Badli Sepoy and his services were utilized either on account of temporary requirements of work or due to leave of absence of regular subordinate employee . At present there is no vacancy for any subordinate staff in the first party Bank and so , there is no need to prepare/ publish any seniority list . The concern workman never completed 240 days of work in any of the branch of the first party Bank . There is no master and servant relationship. Further stand is that as and when any exigency arises , the first party will still engage the concern workman subject to his willingness and availability. The concern workman was provided work when work was available and thereafter there is no exigency of work so , the first party Bank did not engage the concern workman . There is no question of oral termination of the second party workman . On these grounds prayer has been made to reject the reference since concern workman is not entitled to get any relief.

8679 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

A3 . On the other hand first party examined management witness Pravin Nandlal Vyas at Ext. 25 and he was also cross-examined by the representative of the workman Shri Prashant Chaudhary. The first party has submitted two documents as per list at Ext . 12. Ext . 12/1 is the statement of Badli Sepoy Anil Popatlal Ghelani . Ext . 12/2 is the letter of Inter Office memorandum of Bank of India dated January, 9-2003 regarding Ex - Badli Sepoy Anil Popatlal Ghelani Sepoy Showing his works as Badli Sepoy from 1988 to October- 2002 .

7. The workman Anil at Ext . 14 has deposed that the facts stated in his statement of claim Ext . 5 are true and correct . His date of joining as Badli Sepoy in first party Bank was 14.03.1986 and normal duty hours was 10.00 am to 6.30 pm his work was perennial in nature but he was being paid salary of Badli Sepoy. He further deposed that last recruitment of peon was made in 1998 and thereafter no new recruitment of peon/ sepoy has been made . Further deposed that the works of permanent peon such as bringing ledger, putting file on proper table and even dealing with cash too , were being taken by the first party Bank . Besides he also worked as a Sepoy and Chokidar (Watchman ) and such duties also taken by the Bank Officer in supervision and instruction of Bank Manager. He deposed that he performed duties of Badli Sepoy in various branches of the first party Bank situated at Rajkot City and when Manager feels that he has worked for sufficient period in particular branch, he was being transferred to another branch and he was making complaint to the Manager in this regard and the Manager was replying that he could not work in single branch . He further deposed that whatever work he was doing is still going on and that the Bank has appointed two new workmen Dipak Joshi and Bharat Sodha who were junior to him . He deposed that the Bank call the names of Competent candidates from the employment exchange and his name was also sent to the first party Bank for appointment as Badli Sepoy . He received interview letter and he also faced interview. He further deposed that the ChiefManager of main branch Rajkot has issued certificate regarding his work with first party Bank since 14.03.1986 original certificate is Ext. 17. He further deposed that as per Ext. 13/4 and 13/5 which are the photo copies of letters of Zonal Office addressed to branches wherein the yearwise details of his working days with the first party Bank is given and as per detail ne completed 240 days of work in every calendar year . He further deposed that entries of transaction with respect to payment of his monthly salary are mentioned in his Saving Bank Account Pass Book . Ext . 18 and 19 are the original Saving Bank Account Pass Book ofworkman having Bank of India Account No. 46203. He further deposed that he was not given any notice or notice pay or retrenchment compensation on his termination and that after termination he tried to get new job in ICC Bank and SBS Bank but he could not get and presently he is working in small Readymade Cloth Shop at Rajkot and is getting Rs . 2000/ - per month , he showed readiness to join

duty in the Bank of first party. During cross -examined it has come that his appointment was as Badli Sepoy as per joining mention in Ext . 16. He also admitted that he was givenwork in absence of Safai Kamdar , Peon or watchman and whenever required he was being deployed to any branch among the 8 branches of the first party in the Rajkot City. He further deposed that since 1996 he is only Badli Sepoy and he did not completed 240 days of work in particular branch of the first party Bank in course of one year. Witness No. 2 of the second party is Shri Kiritbhai Anantrai Oza who deposed in support of the claim of the second party workman . He deposed that as per due procedure laid by the first party Bank for appointment of Badli Sepoy names of iligible candidates were called from employment exchange and thereafterAppointing Authority, authorized by Bank conducted interview of the candidates and that he deposed that two panels of Badli Sepoy each for city and District are made . Head Office deploys Badli Sepoy from the panels for city in the various branches as well as main branch too . Record for working days ofBadli Sepoy is kept in main branch and salary of Badli Sepoy is being paid by main branch . Workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani was also in approved panel of Badli Sepoy since 1986 : He deposed that Head Office has directed branches that no Badli Sepoy should completed 240 days of work in course ofone year under a confidential correspondence and such kind of instruction is also given in the case of workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani . He further deposed that whenever permanent post of Sepoy fall vacant , Badli Sepoy from the approved panel is appointed to the post and outsiders is never selected to fill the permanent post of Sepoy . Further deposed that work of Badli Sepoy is as call as permanent Sepoy and the record of presence ofBadli Sepoy is keptby particular branch . He further deposed that workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani has continuously worked from August- 2000 to May - 2001 , 302 days in Bhakti Nagar branch . He further deposed that Badli Sepoy entitled to get as much pay and allowances as the permanent Sepoy is getting as per bipartite settlement . He also deposed that workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani has worked in the first party Bank since 1986 to 10.10.2002 . Witness No. 2 Shri Oza is General Secretary ofBank of India Staff Union Saurashtra , Kutch branch since 1979 and is also Vise President in all India Federation so his evidence in supporting the workman's case is worthy of credence and more so , he seems to be competent witness . He was cross - examined on behalf of the first party. He stated Badli Sepoys are deployed in paricular branch when requirement is whole day. He deposed that it is not true that there is no any relief for making Badli Sepoy permanent and if required he is ready to produce approved panel of Badli Sepoy in which name of concern workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani is mentioned. He further stated that instruction for not to allow Anil Popatlal Ghelani to complete 240 days of work particularly and such kind of circulars are shown to him by General Manager whenever representations were made on behalf 8680

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1933 [ PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii ) ] of the union. He further stated that if required he can produced relevant evidence of above mentioned facts such as letters , orders and circulars of the Bank.

8. The management witnesses of first party Bank namely Shri Pravin Vyas Ext . 25 deposed that he is working as a Clerk in the Bank of India, Para Bazar and is stating the facts on basis of the Bank records . He deposed that the workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani was selected in the panel of daily wager temporary Sepoy on 14.03.1986 and his appointment was with condition that he will be depoyed whenever requirement arises only in 8 branches of Rajkot Region. He admitted that in the year 2002 the concern workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani was only Badli Sepoy as per requirements used to discharge the duties of absentee permanent sub staff. Druing cross - examination management witness admitted that workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani was appointed after selected in the interview as iligible candidate on sponsoring his name by employment exchange . He also admitted that workman was appointed after following rules and procedure of requirement . He also admitted that permanent post of Badli Sepoy is filled from the approved panel list of Badli Sepoy. He further stated thatBadli Sepoy is not issued Attendance Card , Pay Slip , Leave Card etc. by the Bank and it is true that such kind of record are not with workman but are kept in the Bank. He also admitted that workman was being deployed to various branches of the Bank situated in the Rajkot City. He also admitted that attendance report of Badli Sepoy is sent to Zonal Office . He deposed that after verifying the records he will produce seniority list of Badli Sepoy working with the second party workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani . Though the management witness claim to produce the seniority list but no any seniority list of the panel of Badli Sepoy has beenproduced . He admitted that he was knowing Shri K.B. Rathodwho is no more and he was also knowing Shri H.K. Chauhan working in main branch and who had been absorbed as permanent Sepoy on completion of 240 days ofworking in first party Bank . He deposed that Shri A.C. Vyas diedbut he show ignorance about his absorption as permanent Sepoy . He stated it is not true to say that second partyhas not completed 240 days of working in a calendar year. By stating this the management witness has admitted that the second party workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani completed 240 days of works in a calendar year.

9. From the evidence of the management witness such facts has come that earlier Shri H.K. Chauhan working with the first party Bank in the main branch as Badli Sepoy was absorbed as permanent Sepoy on completion of 240 days of work . It has been aruged on behalf of the second party workman that the management of first party could not meet such evidence of the workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani when he claim that two Badli Sepoy Dipak Joshi and Bharat Shoda who are junior to him were appointed as Sepoybut partial attitude was taken by the management of Bank in absorbing the second party workman as Sepoy.

Though vacancies in Sepoy were existing due to death . transfer or promotion . The Learned Counsel of the second party further argued that the management of first party could not counter such evidence on the side of the second party.He pointed out further that the management witness himself admitted that Shri H.K. Chauhan working in main branch and had completed 240 days of works has been adsorbed as permanent Sepoy. Whereas there is also evidence on behalf of the second party workman particularly workman witness No. 2 General Secretary of Bank of India Staff Union , Saurashtra Kutch branch since 1979 has deposed that the concern workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani has continuously worked from Aug. -2000 to May- 2001 for 302 days in Bhakti Nagar branch in the Rajkot City. More so , the certificate granted by Chief Manager Bank of India, Rajkot thatAnil Popatlal Ghelani is working with us as sub staff pruely on daily wager basis since 14.03.1986 as per Ext . 17 and as per Ext. 13/5 which is inter office memorandum dated 31.05.2002 reference has been given regarding second party workman Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani on panel ofBadli Sepoy since 1986 and direction was given to the branch that he should be engaged sparingly and interim exigency against the leave vacancy of regular Sepoy butfrom Ext . 13/6 wherein year wise breakup of work of Badli Sepoy Anil Popatlal Ghelani has been mentioned it go to show that in 1986 he worked 154 days , in 1987-84 days 1988-110 days and in 1989-185 days . But from 1990to 2001 the workman Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani has been shown his number of Badli days more than 240 days in each calendar year . This Ext . 13/6 further go to prove the case of the second party workman that right from 1986 he was in the approved panel of Badli Sepoy and from 1990 to onward up to 2001 he worked for more than 240 days in every calendar year . On this juncture such argument by Mr. D.R. Chaudhri , Learned Counsel appearing for the first party has no leg to stand that concern workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani has not all along work in a single branch in a year rather he was deployed for work in different branch though situated in Rajkot City and so he had not completed 240 days of work in any calendar year in any particular branch . But the evidence of 2nd party witness No. 2 that the concern workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani continuously worked from August -2000 to May- 2001 i.e. 302 days in Bhaktinagar branch further go to prove that the workman had completed more than 240 days of work in a particular branch . More so , the concern workman was paid monthly salary on calculating the total days of work by the main branch of Rajkot City where the Saving Bank Account No. 46203 of the second party workman was in operation andthe monthly salary were being credited in his account by the main branch , so it can be said that the main branch of Rajkot was taking supervision of work of the second partyworkman, though work in different branch ofRajkot Cityas a unit and not in different capacity . More so , details ofyearwise breakup of Badli days ofAnil Popatlal Ghelani rightfrom 1990 to 2001 as per Ext. 13/6 dated 22.01.2002 do [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

not also go to support such argument of the Learned Counsel of the first party that the workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani did not complete 240 days of work in any calendar year.

8681

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

considered his case according to the seniority list for his absorption as Sepoy. So , considering the long tenure of work of the second party workman with the management of first party Bank right from 1986 till before his oral termination up to 10.10.2002 , the workman is entitled for the relief of his reinstatement and for active consideration ofhis case to be absorbed as Sepoy. There were vacancies of Sepoy to be filled up from the panel of Badli Sepoy. The first part of this issue is decided against the first party management so far it relates to action of the management being unjustified and illegal . The second part of this issue is decided in favour of the workman in this way that the workman ( second party is entitled ) for his reinstatement with 50 % back wages .

13. ISSUE NΟ . Ι & Π

10. Learned Counsel for the first party in order to support his argument has relied upon a case law of Himanshu Kumar Vidhyarthi and others V / s State of Bihar FLR 1997 ( 76) page 237 , DGM ONGC V / s Illiyas A. Rehman 2005 (2) GLR 1050 SC , State of Gujarat V/ s Rameshchandra ChagunbhaiaMochi 2005. (3 ) GLH 508 Gujarat High Court , Secretary State of Karnataka and others V/ s Umadevi and others 2006 AIR SC 1991 and Taluka Development Officer Rameshchandra M. Bhatt 2003 (3 ) GLH 417. On careful perusal of the aforesaid case laws relied upon by the first party I do not find that any of the case law is applicable in the instant case in view of the second party workman's case and also supported by sufficient oral and documentary evidence . Learned Counsel for the second party workman has also relied upon the case law of Deepak Kumar Gaur V/ s State ofHaryana and others 2010 ( IV) LLJ 407 on the point oftermination of service of workman continuing in service for about three and half years. Though appointment alleged to be temporary for 6 months . The termination was held violative of section 25 (F ) of the ID Act. In case law cited is Divisional Manager New India Insurance Ltd. V/ s A. Sankralingam 2009 ( 1 ) GLH 503 SC wherein it has been held whether workman employed on part time basis under control and supervision of employer , is a workman in terms of section 25 ( S ) of ID Act and so , he would be entitled to the benefit of continuous service under 25 (B ) and entitled for protection under section 25 ( F ) of IDAct .

11. After careful consideration of the evidences adduced on behalfofboth sides in this case and also reliance placed by the party on the case law, I am of the confirm opinion that the second party workman Shri Anil Popatlal Ghelani was doing his casual work of Badli Sepoy in continuity from day ofhis engagement till before his removal from the job on 11.10.2002 . I am also of confirm opinion that the second party workman has completed 240 days of work in calendar year 1990 to 2001 in continuity during his tenure of work in the Bank of the first party and that the workman was doing his job as a regular employee from 10.00 am to 6.30 pm and had completed 240 days ofwork in several preceding calendar years before his termination by oralorder. So issue no. III and IV are decided in affirmative in favour of the second party workman.

12. ISSUE NO . V

In view of the findings given to issue No. III , IV in the foregoing paragraphs I further find and hold that the action of the management of first party to deny employment to the workman is unjustified because several workman (Badli Sepoy) junior to the concern workman were made permanent and allowed to continue their works whereas the second party workman was disengaged and even not In view of the findings given to para 3 , 4 and 5 in the foregoings the workman has got valid cause of action and the dispute raised by the workman in this reference is maintainable .

14. ISSUE NO . VI

The workman is entitled for the reliefs of his reinstatement with continuity in services and for 50 % back wages but no order as to cost .

In view of the above findings the management of first party is directed to reinstate the second party workman Anil Popatlal Ghelani with continuity in service and to pay 50% of back wages and to actively considered his case for absorption as Sepoy within 3 months of the date of receipt ofthis award , failing which the amount of 50 % back wages will also carry interest of 9 % per annum .

Dictated BINAY KUMAR SINHA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर 2011

का०आ० 3392 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , नई दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 103/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12012/173/2000 - आई आर ( बी 2 ) ]

रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3392.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 103/2011) of the 8682

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II--SEC. 3( ii)]

the Conciliation Officer, but conciliation proceedings failed. He claims reinstatement and regularization in service.

Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court- 1, NewDelhi now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management ofPunjab & Sind Bank and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 20/10/ 2011 .

[No. L- 12012/ 173/2000- IR(B - II) ]

RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

3.Management gave contest to the claim pleading thatthe claimant was working on daily wages from 30.9.96 to 22.5.99 at intervals . It has been pleaded that the bank had its recruitment policy and claimant was not recruited in accordance with that policy. The claim put forward is devoid ofmerits , pleads the management .

Annexure

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER,

CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 103/2011

Sh . Shiv Shankar @ Ram Singh

S/o Shri Nanku , R/ o E- 124, Bindapur, Pkt. IV, New Delhi .

Workman

Versus

TheGeneral Manager,

Punjab & Sindh Bank ,

P& S Bank House, 6th Floor, 21, Rajendra Place , New Delhi - 110009.

Management

AWARD

4. Shiv Shankar tendered his affidavit to substantiate his claim . He was cross examined at length on behalf ofthe management . During the course of adducing evidence , the parties reached a settlement . Sh . D.S. Singhal , Senior ManagerOffered a sum of Rs . 40,000/- to Shri Shiv Shankar towards full and final settlement of his claim for reinstatement , wages in lieu of notice , retrenchment compensation, wages for the alleged periods for which it was not paid and claim for regularization in the services of the bank. The claimant accepted the offer made by the bank. Cheque No. 74410 drawn for a sum ofRs . 40,000/-on Industrial Area Phase - 1 , Naraina branch of the bank was givento the claimant , which he accepted for full and final settlement of his claim for reinstatement , wages in lieu of notice, retrenchment compensation , wages for the alleged periods for which it was not paid and claim for regularization in the services of the bank . On acceptance of the above cheque and statement made by the claimant , nothing remains to be adjudicated in the matter . Since dispute stands settled, there is no necessity to answer the reference order. Inview of redressal of grievances of the claimant by way of settlement , referred above , an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer

Dated: 17.10.2011

नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर , 2011 Shiv Shankar @Ram Singh was employed as a class- IV employees on daily wages in Mayapuri Industrial Area branch, New Delhi , Punjab & Sindh Bank, (herein after the bank) .His services were terminated on 24.05.1999 . Shri Shiv Shankar raised a dispute for reinstatement and regularization of his services. Since conciliation proceedings failed, appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide order No. L- 12012/173/2000- IR(B - II ), New Delhi , dated 24.01.2001 , with the following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Punjab and Sindh Bank in terminating the services of Shri Shiv Shankar alias Ram singh son of Shri Nanku daily wages , Class- IV employee w.e.f. 24.5.99 is just , fair and legal ? If not , what relief the said workman is entitled to and from what date? "

का०आ० 3393 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी/270/2000 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12011/96/2000- आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3393. in pursuanceance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT/NGP/270 / 2000) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ 2.Claimant filed his claim statement pleading therein that he was appointed as class - IV employees on daily wages basis . He served the bank from 30.9.1996 to 22.5.1999 , without any break in service . He was entitled for appointment as regular employees . Instead of making him regular in service , his services were dispensed with on 24.5.99 . He served a notice of demand on 10.06.99 seeking reinstatement and regularization of his services . When his demand was not conceded to , he raised a disputed before 8683 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

Labour Court , NAGPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011/96/2000- IR(B- II)] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Date: 10.10.2011 .

Case No. CGIT/NGP/270/ 2000

Party No. 1

Amravati Region ,

The Regional Manager, Bank OfMaharashtra, Deshmukh Building, Lahanuji Nagar, Amravati .

Versus

PartyNo. 2 : The General Secretary, Union of Maharashtra Bank Employees , 542, Dr. Munje Marg , Congress Nagar, Nagpur440012.

AWARD

(Dated: 10th October , 2011 )

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) (" the Act " in short ) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of Bank of Maharashtra and their workman Shri S.B. Shinde , for adjudication, as per letter No. L- 12011/ 96/2000 - IR ( B - II ) dated 24.8.2000 , with the following schedule:-

statement of claim is that he was working as a sub- staff at Gadgenagar Amravati branch of the Bank of Maharashtra and in the year 1995 , he was issued with a charge sheet containing four heads of charges and as he denied the charges , a departmental proceeding was initiated against him and in the departmental proceeding, he was forcedto accept the charges , as per the wrong advise given by his defence representative and orally he was assured that no capital punishment would be imposed upon him and he was compelled to accept the charges , without anticipating the consequences of accepting the charges and ultimately, vide order dated 03.12.1996, he was compulsorily retired from services and additionally punishment of stoppage of two increments was also imposed against him . It is further pleaded by the workman that while he was working as sub- staff at Gadgenagar Amravati branch, one Manekar was the Branch Manager of the said branch and as he was a substaff, he was duty bound to obey all the orders of the BranchManager and he was neither having powers to deal with advances of the Branch nor did at any time he was involved in either clerical or officer's duties and Shri Manekar distributed certain loans to borrowers and Shri Manekar was charge sheeted for irregularities and other misconducts committed by him in dealing with the loan department and was dismissed from the services of the Bank by the management and the contains of the charge sheet issued against him show that it is a shadow of action taken by the management against Shri Manekar and the charges mentioned in the charge sheet were without any evidence and the same were baseless , but taking into account the acceptance given by him under misrepresentation of the facts , management held him guilty and awarded the impugned punishment and the punishment dated 03.12.1996 is illegal and unjustified, since the same was passed without application ofjudicious mind and without following the rules of natural justice and the finding of the enquiry officer are not based on concrete evidence and the punishment is disproportionate . Prayer has been made by the workman for his reinstatement in service with full back wages and other benefits .

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Maharashtra through its Regional Manager , Amravati Regional Office , Amravati in awarding the punishment of reduction of 2 increments in present scale ofpay and compulsory retirement of Shri S.B. Shinde vide order dated 03.12.1996 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the said workman is entitled and from what date ? "

2.On receipt ofthe reference , parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement, inresponse to which, the workman , Shri S.B. Shinde , ( " the workman " in short ) through his union , " Union of the Maharashtra Bank Employees " ( " the union " in short) filed the statement of claim and the management of Regional Manager, Bank of Maharashtra , Amravati Regional ("party no . 1 " in short) filed the written statement .

3. The party no . 1 in its written statement has pleaded inter- alia that disciplinary action was initiated against the workman vide charge sheet dated 01.08.1995 and charges under clauses 19.2 read with clause 19.5 (j ) , 19.5(d) , 19.5 (j ) and 19.7 ( i ) ofthe Bipartite Settlement were leveled against him on the allegation of becoming an accomplice to the acts of removal and exchange of Bank records , causing damage to the records of the Bank deliberately, mbezzlement of loan amount ofone Shri Tayade , by actively co-operating in the A/c of M/s . Jagadamba Cloth Stores , which were acts prejudicial to the interest of the bank and for taking a loan amount from Jagadamba Cloth Stores beyond his Known means respectively and the workman accepted all the charges unconditionally, before the enquiry officer and accordingly, the enquiry officer submitted his The case of the workman as projected in the

4182GI/11 19 8684

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

the entire enquiry was conducted in English language, which was not known to the workman and as such, all the recordings in the enquiry proceedings by the enquiry officer were without the knowledge and understanding of the workman and as such , the conclusion drawnby the enquiry officer on such materials is bad in law and the workman was not given reasonable opportunity in the enquiry and the punishment is shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct and the workman is entitled for reinstatement in service with continuity and full back wages.

6. Perused the record. So far the contentions raised bythe learned advocate for the workman that as the entire proceedings of the departmental enquiry were recorded in English and the workman did not understand the proceeding as he did not know English language is concernes , the same cannot be entertained ; as because such a plea has not been taken in the statement of claim, filed by the workman . Moreover, on perusal of the departmental proceedings it is found that the workman had never raised any objection for recording of the proceedings in English language on the ground that he doesn't know English language . It is also found that the appeal filedby the workman was in English . Moreover, the workman was represented by a co - worker and there is nothing on record to show that the co - worker also did not know English language .

report dated 12.07.1996 , holding all the charges to have been proved against the workman and the Disciplinary Authoiry accepted the findings of the enquiry officer and informed the workman about the proposed punishment vide letter dated 02.11,1996 and a personal hearing on the proposed punishment was also given to the workman on 22.11.1996 and taking into consideration the say of the workman on the proposed punishment, the Disciplinary Authority imposed the punishment of reduction of time scale of pay by two stages for the first two head of charges , compulsory retirement for charge number three and warning for the charge number four, with a direction that the punishments were to run consecutively and the workman preferred an appeal against the order of the Disciplinary Authority vide memorandum of appeal dated 16.01.1997 and though personal hearing was offered by the Appellate Authority, the workman did not appear before the Appellate Authority to submit his say and the Appellate Authority taking into consideration the say of the workman in the memorandum of Appeal , dismissed the appeal and confirmed the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority. The further case of the party no. 1 is that the workman accepted the charges before the enquiry officer during the enquiry proceedings and the acceptance of the charges was unconditional and the workman was neither forced to accept the charges nor assurance was given by the bank for acceptance of charges by the workman and the contents of the charge sheet submitted against Shri Manekar , the Branch Manager were totally different from the charges leveled against the workman and full opportunity was extended to the workman to defend the case and the findings ofthe enquiry officer are not perverse and since the punishment involves charges involving moran turpitude and embezzlement , the punishment imposed is just and proper and commensurate with the nature of misconduct.

Onperusal of the documents of the departmental proceedings , it is found that the workman voluntarily admitted the charges leveled against him , after verification ofthe documents of the management , though initialy he had denied the charges . There is no legal evidence on record to show that the admission of the charges by the workmanwasdue to wrong advise by the co- worker or due to any promise given by the authority not to impose capital punishment . When the workman has admitted the charges categorically one by one, before the enquiry officer the findings of the enquriy officer basing on such admission ofthe workman cannot be said to be perverse .

4.As this is a case of compulsory retirement of the workman from services after holding of a departmental enquiry, the validity of the departmental enquiry was taken up as a preliminary issue for consideration and vide order dated 04.02.2009, the departmental proceeding was held to be legal , proper and in accordance with the principles of naturaljustice .

So far the question of proportionity of the punishment is concerned , admittedly the workman was an employee ofthe bank. So it was the duty ofthe workmanto take all possible steps to ensure and protect the interest of the bank and to discharge his duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence, but the workman commited misconduct for his personal ends and against the interest ofthe bank. Commission of serious misconducts have been proved against the workman in a fair and properly held departmental enquiry. Hence , the punishment of voluntary retirement for the charge of embezzlement of money of the bank and reduction of two stages of scale ofpay for other misconducts committed by him cannot be said to be disproportionate .Hence , it is ordered:

5.Atthe time of argument, it was submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that the workman was working as a sub - staff and he was obeying the orders of theManager and the Manager was dismissed from services of the bank , for his misdeeds and the manager was responsible for the misdeeds and the workman cannot be held responsible for the same and sanctioning of loan or dealing with the financial matters of the customers of the bank are undisputedly the duties of the branch manager and no nexus can be drawn or alleged against the workman, who was obeying the reasonable orders of the branch manager, he being a sub- staff. It was further submitted that [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

ORDER

The action of the management of Bank of Maharashtra through its Regional Manager , Amravati Regional Officer , Amravati in awarding the punishment of reduction of 2 increments in present scale of pay and compulsory retirement of Shri S.B. Shinde vide order dated 03.12.1996 is legal and justified. The workman is not entitled for any relief.

J.P. CHAND , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

काआ 3394 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय- II , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 118/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार 17 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[कं एल-12011 / 36/ 2010 - आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3394.-.in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 118/2011 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court- II , CHANDIGARH now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011/36/2010- IR (B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT- IL, CHANDIGARH

PRESENT : Sri A.K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer.

Case No. I.D. 118/2011

Registered on 30.3.2011

The General Secretary , Central Bank of India Employees Union Harayana , H.No. 3296, Sector 19 -D, Chandigarh .

Applicant

Versus

The Zonal Manager , Central Bank of India , Zonal Office, Sector 17 , Chandigarh .

Respondent

8685

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

APPEARANCES

None

For the workman

None

For the Management

AWARD

Passed on 15.9.2011

Central Government vide Notification No. L - 12011 / 36/ 2010 - IR ( B - II ) Dated 23/2/2011 , by exercising its powers under Section 10 Sub Section ( 1 ) Clause ( d) and Sub Section 2 (A) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( hereinafter referred to as Act ) has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal : --

"Whether the action of the management of Central Bank of India in suspending Sh . T.R. Kaushal w.e.f. 26.4.2005 to 10.5.2005 and imposing punishment ofreduction of pay by one stage in the pay scale for two years is just, fair and legal? What relief the concerned workman is entitled? "

After receiving the reference the notices were issued to the parties on 30.3.2011 and by registered post on 6.5.2011 . Notice sent by registered post were not received back undelivered. Hence service is presumed on the parties. They do not turn up . As the workman failed to appear and file claim statement , a 'No Dispute ' award is passed in the case . Let two copies of the Award be sent to Central Government for further necessary action .

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर 2011

काआ 3395 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय II , चंडीगढ़ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 849/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [ तं एल-12012/ 222/2003 - आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3395. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref . No. 849/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court - II , CHANDIGARH now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indian Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12012/ 222/ 2003 - IR (B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer 8686

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 (ii) ] ANNEXURE

IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL CUM- LABOUR COURT- II, CHANDIGARH

PRESENT: Shri A.K. Rastogi , Presiding Officer

Case No. I.D. 849/2005

Registered on 30.3.2004

Shri Anil Kumar Bhalla, C/ o Smt . Rakesh Rani, Steno O/ oMunicipal Committee Mandi Gobindgarh Fatehgarh.

and through leading questions at the dictation of the Presenting Officer. The further case of the workman in short isthat there was no reliable evidence against him to prove the charge. The disciplinary authority did not consider the submissions of the workman and it imposed extreme penalty without any supporting reason for his conclusions . The penalty imposed is illegal , wrong and against rules . He preferred an appeal against the order of the disciplinary authority but without success . The workman has requested for setting aside the order of the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority and for his reinstatement with all consequential benefits of pay, and allowances seniority etc.

Petitioner

Versus

TheManager, Indian Bank, Circle Office , 7- C, Chandigarh.

Respondent

APPEARANCES

Forthe workman

Shri H.S. Sethi Advocate .

Forthe Management Sh . Tribhawam Singla Advocate

AWARD

Passed on Oct. 14, 2011

Central Government vide Notification No. L- 12012/ 222/2003 - IR(B - II) Dated 9.3.2004, by exercising its powers under Section 10 Sub Section (1) Clause (d) and Sub Section 2(A) ofthe Industrial DisputesAct, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as'Act') has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

"Whether the action of the management of Indian Bank, Circle Office, Chandigarh to impose the punishment of removal from service on Sh . Anil Kumar Bhalla, Ex-Clerk is legal and justified? If not, what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date?".

The claim was contested by the respondent. From the written statement it appears that the allegation against the workman was that he did not remit to the Bank an amount of Rs . 2,600/ - deposited by account holder Sh .Ayodhya Prasad in his Saving Bank account . Workman issued counter foil for having collected the amount and also made an entry in the Pass Book but destroyed the saving challans voucher and thus misappropriated the bank's funds and committed a fraud on the bank and he had not followed the established procedure for collecting cash for the customers and duly accounted for the same to thebank .According to thespotent the Enquiry Officer had been appointed as per the rules and regulations and there is no provision in the Bipartite Settlement that appointment of enquiry is to be placed on the notice board. The appointment letter of the Enquiry Officer was part of the enquiry record and the workman was well aware of the name of the Enquiry Officer and he without any protest participated in the enquiry proceedings . The workman had been given an opportunity for engaging defence representative but he refused to utilize the services of any. He cross -examined each and every witness ; and documents Exhibit MEX- 1 to MEX- 16 were duly proved and the originals had been shown to the workman. He had signed the day'sproceedings without any protest. Sh. Ayodhya Prasad was the complainant in the case and he was produced in the enquiry as Exhibit MW1 . Workman never took any objection regarding the identity of Sh. Ayodhya Prasad. Sh .Ayodhya Prasad had been cross - examinedby the workman at length . According to the details given in the written statement the evidence adduced in the enquiry clearly established the allegations against the workman . TheEnquiry Officer submitted his report after carefully going though the documents on records and considering the oral submissions made by the workman . Disciplinary authoritypassed the punishment order after issuing a show cause notice and after hearing the workman personally and the appellate authority has given a detailed finding on each and everyaspect of the case . The claim ofthe workman therefore has no merits .

Workman filed a rejoinder to the written statement to reiterate his case .

Theworkman Sh. Anil Kumar Bhaila working as Clerk/ ShroffBranch Office Mohali, at the relevant time, was removed from service by the management after holding an enquiry. The workman has challenged the order of punishment on the grounds that the charge sheet did not contain the article of charges and the statement of imputation ofmisconduct, the list of documents and list of witnesses were also not attached therewith, (the same was howwwer supplied to him at a subsequent date) , the Enquiry Officer was not appointed as per procedure and no notice was displayedonthe Bank nonce board , the worldmanwas not allowed reasonable opportunity to defend, time was not allowed tomexamine the original documents and they were marked as Exhibits without proof, one witness Sh. Ayodhya Prasad , the depositor, was examined without anyprior notice, and the identity of said Ayodhya Prasad could not be established but the Enquiry Officer and the PresentingOfficer connived to record his evidencewrongly [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Workman filed his affidavit in support of his case while on behalf of the management affidavit of Mr. Narender Singh , Senior Manager ( Law) in Indian Bank Circle Office , Sector 7 , Chandigarh was filed . Management also placed on record a copy of the enquiry report .

In this matter , following issues arise for consideration .

1. Whether the workman was denied the reasonable opportunity to defend?

2. Whether the evidence produced in the enquiry is sufficient to establish the charge against the workman.

3. To what relief is the workman entitled?

I have heard the learned counsel for the workman and have gone through the written argument of the management and have also carefully perused the enquiry report . My findings on various issues are as follows:-

FINDINGS

Issue No. 1

Regarding the denial of opportunity to defend, the workman has alleged that the charge sheet did not contain the articles of charges , statement of imputation of misconduct and the list of documents and list of witnesses was not supplied to him along with charge sheet . Enquiry proceedings started on 12.10.2001 but the list of witnesses and list of documents were produced on 16.1.2002 and were marked as Exhibit MEX - 1 to MEX - 16 without getting the same proved from their writers , signatories or authors and the workman was not allowed to examine original documents .

Acopy ofcharge sheet is Exhibit 2 of the affidavit of MW- 1 . It contains the article of charges and the details of the imputation against the workman . To argue contra is without basis .

A perusal of the enquiry record shows that on the first date of enquiry i.e. 13.12.2001 the workman was present . Appointing letter of the Enquiry Officer was taken on record. Charge sheet was read over and explained to workman and he was asked whether he pleads guilty . On his not pleading guilty the Enquiry Officer explained the procedure for the enquiry and asked him whether he wants to avail the service of a defence representative . On his declining the services of the defence representative the enquiry proceedings were adjourned to 16.1.2002. On 16.1.2002 the Presenting Officer produced a list of evidence , documents and witnesses . The Enquiry Officer asked the workman to go through the documents and let him know if he was having any objection and he may have sufficient time to study the documents to which the workman had replied that he had no objection in the admission of the documents and copies of the documents had been received by him . It was thereafter that the Enquiry Officer admitted the documents and marked

8687

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

them as Exhibits . Enquiry officer then asked the workman whether he wanted some more time to study the documents to which the workman had said no .

It is thus clear that though the documents and list of witnesses were not supplied to the workman at the time of serving the charge sheet and they were brought on record during the enquiry but that was with the consent of the workman . He had been given opportunity and time to examine or study the documents . Therefore it cannot be said that workman was not given proper opportunity to defend or he was prejudiced in his defence . Issue No. 1 is decided against the workman .

Issue No. 2

The argument of the workman is that evidence produced in the enquiry is not reliable and sufficient to establish the charge against him . Sh . Ayodhya Prasad the depositor was examined without any notice or prior intimation to the workman and his identity is also not established . He is an illiterate person but he was confronted with a typed document in English . The said document was also produced without notice in deceptive manner and was marked as MEX - 1 .

It is important to note that MEX - 1 is a complaint made by the depositor . As stated above the proceeding dated 16.1.2002 indicates that before the conduct of the actual enquiry proceedings the list of witnesses and the documents had been provided to the workman . The statement of Sh . Ayodhya Prasad was recorded in the presence of the workman . It is Annexure Al filed by the management . This paper along with certain other papers filed by the management were taken on record vide Order dated 23.11.2010 as there was no objection on behalf of the workman regarding these papers . No doubt this document is in English and it bears the thumb impression of the depositor indicating that the depositor is an illiterate person but the depositor Sh . Ayodhya Prasad in his statement as confirmed the contents of this letter . Hence , the Enquiry Officer committed no illegality in considering this letter . The identity of Sh . Ayodhya Prasad was also not challenged at any stage during the proceedings by the workman . Hence , the objection of the workman in this regard is an afterthought and without basis . It also cannot be successfully argued that Sh . Ayodhya Prasad and his letter Annexure Al were sprung as a surprise .

It was argued on behalf of the workman that the Enquiry Officer ignored the fact that Sh . Ayodhya Prasad could not tell the date of alleged deposit and could not produce any proof of handing over any amount to the workman or of making any entry in the passbook of the depositor by the workman or of giving any receipt to the depositor. In this regard the most important evidence is the letter ofthe workman himself which is Annexure A12 of the list paper No. 95 of management documents . In this letter 8688

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)] he has admitted that he had not deposited the amount of Rs. 2600/- and has embezzled it . It is dated 12.9.2001 and it indicates that the workman had deposited the amount with thisletter.

(Sunday) is not a matter of doubt as the challans may be filled by a depositor even on a holiday. The stamp of 28.7.2001 on cash receipt is however not in conformity with the date of deposit . But there is consistency in the evidence that the deposit was made on 30.7.2001. The discrepancy figuring in cash receiptby the stamp dated 28th July, 2011 is not of much consequence and significance. That appears a result ofhuman error. The fact remains that the depositor had deposited the money on 30.7.2001 and the same was not accounted for in the Bank books by the workman . This fact is clearly established from the evidence produced in the enquiry.

The Enquiry Officer in his report has stated that the depositor reported to the Branch Manager on 5.9.2001 when he visited the Branch and he was told that the entry of the said amount is not reflected in the bank books . The Enquiry Officer has observed that had the complainant not reported the matter to Branch Manager on 5.9.2001 the CSC i.e. the workman would not have ever deposited the amount .As reported by Enquiry Officer the depositor in his statement identified depositor's receipt Annexure A2 of list paper No.95.

Tohold the workman guilty of the charge the Enquiry Officer had relied on the evidence of six witnesses vis the complainant Sh . Ayodhya Prasad holder of Saving Bank Account No. 31527/15 , the Branch Manager Sh . Surjit Singh , Assistant Branch Manager Sh . S.S. Rurak, Sh . Inderpal Singh Clerk/ Shroff and two Arm Guards Vishambar Singh and Gurmukh Singh of the related branch of the Bank and on 16 documents . He has found the act of the workman prejudicial to the interest of the Bank and of gross negligence involving or likely to involve the Bank in serious loss and causing willful damage or attempt to cause damage tothe property of the Bank in serious loss and committing breach of rules of business of the Bank or instructions for running ofDepartment .

I am of the view that the charges levelled against the workman are clearly established from the evidence on enquiry record. Issue No. 2 is decided against the workman. Issue No. 3

The depositor had deposited the amount with the help of MW4 Sh. Gurmukh Singh , the Arm Guard of the bank . MW4 has stated in his statement that on 30.7.2001 , Sh . Ayodhya Prasad was standing for half an hour to deposit the cash in his account before the cash cabin of the bank. Sh . Ayodhya Prasad requested the witness to help and to deposit his cash as he had to go to a far off place . The witness took the money and handed it over to cashier in Ayodhya Prasad's presence . The cashier i.e. the workman handed over the receipt counter - foil to the witness afterduly affixing the cash stamp . Sh . Ayodhya Prasad as MW1 in his statement has corroborated MW4 Gurmukh Singh guard. He has also stated that he had requested the guard for helping him in depositing the cash , had given the cash to the guard and the guard in his presence had given the cash to the cashier .

The workman has been punished for not accounting for in the Bank books , an amount of Rs . 2600/ - deposited by a Saving Bank account holder Sh . Ayodhya Prasad .He has been removed from the service with superannuation benefits . It can't be said that the disciplinary authority had no reason for imposing the punishment or the punishment order is illegal , wrong or against the rules . The punishment given to the workman cannot be considered as unduly harsh; rather it is on lenient side as the superannuation benefits have been allowed to him . As it has been held by theHon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Vishwa Mohan (1998) 4 Supreme Court cases 310 in the banking business absolute devotion , diligence , integrity and honesty needs to be preserved by every bank employee otherwise, the confidence of the public/ depositors would beimpaired.

MW2 in the enquiry is the Branch Manager Sh . Surjit Singh . He has stated about the complaint of Sh. Ayodhya Prasad, identified original counter foil MEX - 2 and MEX3 the passbook of the saving bank account of Sh . Ayodhya Prasad. The credit entry of Rs . 2600/- in the passbook is dated 30.7.2001 . His statement shows that in the rough cash book of 28.7.2001 MEX 4/1 and rough cash book of 30.7.2001 MEX 4/2 there was no entry of the amount . The entry of 28.7.2001 is relevant as the cash receipt MEX 2 bears the stamp of 28.7.2001 . The witness has also stated thatthe workman tendered Rs . 2600/- along with pay in slip marked MEX 11 on 12.9.2001 in the evening when the cash isclosed and kept inside the stock room . On 13.9.2001 after obtaining instructions from Circle Office Chandigarh the amount was deposited in Sundries Deposit account . He has also deposed about the letter MEX 12 of the workman wherein he had admitted his guilt .

I consider the punishment awarded to the workman is reasonable and appropriate , legal and justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief. Issue No. 3 is decided against the workman .

Itwas argued on behalf of the workman that there is a contradiction in the evidence inasmuch as cash receipt bears the date 28th July, 2001 , challans bears 29.7.2001 while the date of credit entry of the amount is 30.7.2001 .

Reference is accordingly answered against the workman . Let two copies of the Award be sent to Central Government for further necessary action .

It is clearfrom the evidence in the enquiry that 30.7.2001 was Monday. Date of challans i.e. 29.7.2001

ASHOK KUMAR RASTOGI , PresidingOfficer [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्टूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3396 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , जयपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 10/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था। सरकार औद्योगिक [सं एल -12012/48/2010- आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3396.- in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref . No. 10/2011 ) of the Central-Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Disputes between the employers in relation to the management of Vijaya Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17.10.2011 .

[No. L - 12012/48 /2010- IR (B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR

PRESENT

N.K. PUROHIT PRESIDING OFFICER

I.D. 10/2011

Reference No. L - 12012 / 48 / 2010 - IR (B - II)

Dated: 4.5.2011 Shri Murlidhar S/o Shri Morulal Harijan R/ o Village Kaithoon , Teh . , Ladpura , Distt.: Kota ( Rajasthan)

V/ s

1. The Chairman & Managing Director Vijaya Bank , 41/2 , M.G Road , Bangalore ,

2. The Manager,

Vijaya Bank, Plot No. 3 , Aerodrum Circle ,

Kota (Rajasthan) .

AWARD

19.9.2011

8689

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

1. The Central Government is exercise of the powers conferred under clause ( d) of Sub- Section 1 & 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication which is as under :-

"Whether the action of the management of M/ s . Vijaya Bank in terminating the service of Sh . Murlidhar S/o Sh . Modulal w.e.f May, 2009 is just and legal ? What relief the concerned workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference , the registered notices were issued to both the parties . Representative on behalf of the non - applicant appeared on 8.8.2011 & 29.8.2011 . On perusal of the acknolwedgement receipt on record it appears that the registered notice has been served upon the workman but despite service of registered notice none appeared on behalf of the workman on 8.8.2011 , 29.8.2011 & 19.9.2011 .

3. The workman has not appeared to file his claim statement . It appears that the workman is not willing to contest the case further . Under these circumstances , there is no material on record for adjudication of the reference under consideration on merits . Therefore " No Cliam Award " is passed in this matter. The reference under adjudication is answered accordingly.

4. Award as above .

N.K. PUROHIT, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 31 अक्टूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3397 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मोरमुगांव पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/ 31 ऑफ 2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था । [सं० एल-36011 / 06/2010 - आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3397. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/ 31 of 2011 ) of the Central- Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Disputes between the employers in relation to the management of Mormugao Port Trust and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24.10.2011 .

[No. L- 36011 / 06/ 2010- IR (B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer 8690

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ

PRESIDING OFFICER

Reference No. CGIT- 2/31 OF 2011 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MORMUGAO PORT TRUST

The Chairman

Mormugao Port Trust

Headland Sada

Goa-403804.

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

TheGeneral Secretary

GoaPort andDock Employees Union

MainAdministrative Office Building

Mormugao Port Trust

Headland Sada Goa-403804.

APPEARANCES

FOR THE EMPLOYER :

No appearance.

FOR THE WORKMEN :

No appearance .

Camp: Goa, dated the 23rd September, 2011 .

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L -36011 / 06/2010 - IR ( B - II ) , dated 27.5.2011 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Mormugao Port Trust, Goa in withdrawing the "Compulsory Rest " availed by the workmen working in the Railway & Shipping Section of Traffic Department ofMPT by issuing the Notice of change dated 10.3.2010 under Section 9A of the I.D. Act, 1947 (Annex - I -A) is legal and justified? What relief the workmen are entitled for? "

2.Notices were issued to both the parties . However second party though duly served, remained absent. Registered AD receipt to that effect is at Ex - 4 . The second party union or the workmen concerned neither appeared not filed the statement ofclaim. Without Statement ofclaim , the reference cannot be decided on merits . Thus the same deserves to be dismissed . Therefore , I pass the following order:

[PART II- SEC . 3 (ii) ]

ORDER

Reference is dismissed for default.

Date: 23.9.2011

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ Camp: Goa

Presiding Officer/Judge नई दिल्ली 31 , अक्टूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3398 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/23 ऑफ 2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 24 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं एल -12011 /78/2010- आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3398. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 2 /23 of2011 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court-2 , Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 24.10.2011 .

[No. L- 12011 /78/2010- IR (B-I) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ PresidingOfficer

REFERENCE NO . CGIT- 2 /23 OF 2011 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

The Dy. General Manager Central Bank of India ZonalOffice No. 317 , M.G Road Pune (MS) .

AND

The General Secretary

THEIR WORKMEN Central Bank Employees' Association [भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii) ]

C/ o. Central Bank of India SatpurBranch P- 63 , MIDC Satpur Nasik (MS) 422007.

APPEARANCES

FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. L.L. D'Souza, Representative.

FOR THE WORKMEN : No appearance .

Mumbai , dated the 3rd October, 2011 .

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L- 12011 / 78 / 2010- IR (B - II ) , dated 11.5.2011 in exercise ofthe powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the process of inquiry and the punishment inflicted upon Shri B.T. Sawant, PTSK by the management of Central Bank of India, is proper, correct and justified? What relief and actual privileges is the workman entitled to ? " 2.Notices were issued to both the parties . However second party though duly served , remained absent . Registered AD receipt to that effect is at Ex -4 . The second party union did not appear and file the statement ofclaim . Without Statement of claim , the reference cannot be decided on merits and the same deserves to be dismissed . Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Date: 3.10.2011

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ, Presiding Officer/ Judge नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्टूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3399 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 24/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21 10 11 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

[सं एल-12011/67/2006- आई आर ( बी 2) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3399.-In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Central Government 4182GI/11-20

8691

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 24/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 21.10.2011 .

[No. L- 12011 /67/2006- IR (B- II)] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT, LUCKNOW

PRESENT

Dr. MANJUNIGAM PRESIDING OFFICER

I.D. No. 24/2006

Ref. No. L- 12011 / 67/2006- IR (B- II) dated: 13.09.2006

BETWEEN

TheDy. Secretary Central Bank Staff Association 13/11 , Shiv Nagar Colony Allahapur Allahabad- 0 (Espousing case of Shri Shyam Narayan)

AND

The Dy. General Manager Central Bank of India Zonal Office, 23 , Vidhan Sabha Marg Lucknow -226001.

AWARD

1. By order No. L- 12011/ 67 / 2006 - IR ( B - II ) dated: 13.09.2006 the Central Government in the Ministry ofLabour , New Delhi in exercise of powers conferredby clause (d) of sub section ( 1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10ofthe Industrial Disputes act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between the Dy. Secretary, Central Bank Staff Association , 13/11 , Shiv Nagar Colony , Allahapur, Allahabad (Espousing case of Shri Shyam Narayan) and the Dy. General Manager, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office , 23 , Vidhan Sabha Marg , Lucknow for adjudication.

2. The referrence under adjudication is:

"Whether the action of the management of central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Shyam Narayan S/o Shri Ram Krishan , daily wager/peon w.e.f. 14.08.2004 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled? " 8692

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

3. The case of workman's union, in brief, is that the workman Shyam Narain was deployed on the post ofPeon by the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Sarnath Branch, Varanasi w.e.f. 10.03.1988 and he worked as such continuously upto 14.08.2004 without any break, when his services have been terminated by the Bank without any notice or notice pay in lieu thereof, in violation of provisions contained in section 25F. It has been submitted by the workman'sunion that in the starting the workman had been paid through vouchers@ Rs . 14/- per day, which was later increased to Rs . 20/- . The workman's union has alleged that though he worked continuously for more than 240 days during 12 consecutive months , the management of the Bank has shown several artificial breaks in his services just to deprive him from his claim for permanent absorption in the Bank's service . Accordingly, the workman's union has prayed that the oral termination of the workman vide dated 14.08.2004 be set aside and he be reinstated with all consequential benefits including back wages .

4. The management of the Bank has disputed the claim ofthe workman's union by filing its written statement; wherein it has submitted that the workman was never appointed in Bank's services nor was issued any appointment letter, accordingly, there was no employer- employee relationship between Bank and the workman , as such, there arise no question of terminating his services at anypoint oftime. It has been submitted by the management that the workman was engaged purely on day to day basis as per local exigency of the Bank and he was paid wages on daily rated basis commensurating with nature of work and period of engagement . Accordingly, the management of the Bank has prayed that the claim of the workman's union be rejected without any relief to the workman concerned .

5. The workman did not file any rejoinder inspite of opportunities being given to him .

6. The parties have filed documentary proof in support of their respective cases . The workman has examined himself whereas the management examined Shri Suresh Prakash Shukla , Senior Manager in support of their respective stands . The parties availed opportunity to cross-examine the each other's witnesses . The management concluded its evidence on 27.09.2010 and next date 16.11.2010 was fixed for arguments ; but the parties refrained to put up their appearance and 28.12.2010 was fixed . When the parties did not turn up for arguments on 28.12.2010 , 15.02.2011 ,04.04.2011 , 28.04.2011 , 14.06.2011 , 05.07.2011 and 29.08.2011 , the case was reserved for award being the case very old, pertaining to the year 2006.

7. Perused entire evidence on record .

8. The case of the workman's union is that the workman had been appointed by the Branch Manager on

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii )] thepost of Peon and was paid at daily rates . Also , that he worked continuously for 240 days in consecutive year and his services have been terminated in violation of provisions ofSection 25F ofthe I.D.Act, 1947. The Union has examined workman in support of its case , who has stated on oath thathe worked as Part Time worker in the Bankw.e.f. 10.03.88 and he was paid @ Rs . 20/ - per day . He further stated that he worked for 254 days during period 01.04.92 to 31.03.93 andheworked upto 14.08.2004; and also , that he had been terminated orally. In cross examination he stated that when regular staffbecame available , he was terminated . He also stated that he is not aware of the date when he worked for last time in the Bank .

Insupport ofhis case the workman's union has filed followingdocuments:

(i) Photo copy of office circular dated 04.10.1990 regarding payment to temporary employees, paper No. 12/5.

(ii) Minutes of Joint discussion between workman's Union andBank dated 31.12.2001, paper No. 13/2 to 13/6.

(iii) Photo copy of Letter dated 01.12.94 regarding details ofpersons worked on casual/termporary basisfor 240 days or more , paper No. 13/7.

9. Per contra, the management of the Bank has contended that it never appointed the workman, therefore, there arise no question of his termination ; rather , it submitted that the workman was engaged in exigency and was paid accordingly. In support of its case it has examined Shri Suresh Prakash Shukla , Senir Manager who has stated on oath that the workman was never appointed in theBank nor was issued any appointment letter. He has stated that the workman was engaged on day to day basis as per local exigency of the Bank and was paid on daily rated basis . In cross-examination , he has stated that the workman has not worked for 240 days in a year .

The Management has filed on copy of letter dated 27.07.98 , calling the workman for interview. It has also relied onjudgement given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka & other vs. Uma Devi & others .

10. In the light of the aforesaid rival stand ofboth the sides I have scanned the documents produced by the parties . The workman has not filed any document to sustain his contention that he was appointed by the opposite party Bank and had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year. On the other hand the management has shaken from responsbility of producing originals of the payments vouchers .

11.Admittedly no appointment letter was issued and no post was ever advertised for the appointment . There is no evidence of the workman that the Branch Manager was [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

competent to appoint sub staff; moreover , it has been stated by MW Shri Suresh Prakash Shukla that the workman was engaged on day to day basis as per local exigency of the Bank and was paid wages on daily rate basis accordingly to work taken and time consumed from him . The management of the Bank vide order dated 31.07.2007 was directed to give details of engagement , date , month , year and wage togeter with the certified copy of vouchers . The management failed to comply with the orders of the Tribunal in total but filed details of the working days in respect of the workman for the period 01.04.92 to 31.03.1993 vide application dated 08.08.2007 , paper No. C - 19 , which details as under:

Month

No. ofdays

13 April , 92

21 May, 92

15 June , 92

27 July, 92

22 August, 92

22 September, 92

21 October , 92

24 November , 92

22 December , 92

22 January, 93

23 February, 93

22 March , 93

254 Total

12. Having gone thorough rival contentions of the parties , I have scanned entire evidence submitted the parties . In the instant case in view of pleadings of the workman regarding continuous working of the workman for more than 240 days ; and denial of the management of the same ; also , filing of workman certain documents less any payment voucher ; and the management filling details ofworking days vide application dated 08.08.2007 , paper No. C - 17 , this Tribunal has to see as to whether the workman worked for 240 days in preceding twelve months from the date of alleged termination i. e . 14.08.2004 or note .

13. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of order the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail . In the present case burden was on the workman's union to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the termination order and to prove the termination order was illegal . It was the case of the workman's union that the workman had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned. This claim has been denied by the management; therefore , it was for the workman's union to lead evidence to show that the workman had in fact worked up to 240 days in the year preceding his alleged termination . In (2002 ) 3 SSC 25 Range

8693

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

Forest Officer vs. S.T. Hadimani Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:

" It was the case of the claimant that he had so worked but this claim was denied by the appellant. It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination . Filling of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that can not be regarded as sufficient evidence for any court or tribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had, in fact , worked for 240 days or order or record of appointment or engagement for that period was produced by the workman. On his ground alone, the award is liable to be set aside . "

15. Analyzing its earlier decisions on the aforesaid point Hon'ble Apex Court has observed in 2006 ( 108 ) FLR R.M. Yellatti & Asstt . Executive Engineer as follow:

" It is clear that the provisions of the evidence Act in terms do not apply to the proceedings under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . However , applying general principals and on reading the aforestated judgements we find that this Court has repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked 240 days in a given year . This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping in the witness box . This burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent evidence , both oral and documentary . In cases of termination of services of daily wages earner, there will be no letter of appointment or termination . There will also be no receipt or proof of payment . Thus , in most cases , the workman ( claimant ) can only call upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period , the letter of appointment or termination , if any , the wage register , the attendance register etc. Drawing of adverse inference ultimately would depend thereafter on facts of each case . The above decisions however make it clear that mere affidavits or self serving statements made by the claimant/ workman will no suffice in the matter of discharge of the burden placed by law on the workman to prove that he had worked for 240 days in a given year . The above judgments further lay down that mere non production of muster rolls per se without any plea of suppression by the claimant workman will not be the ground for the tribunal to draw an adverse inference against the management . "

16. In the present case the workman has stated that he has worked for 254 days during period 01.04.92 to 31.03.93 and also that he worked up to 14.08.2004 continuously ; but it was not the case of the workman's union that the workman has worked continuously for 240 days from the alleged dated of termination i.e. 14.08.2004 .

8694

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

Itwas pleaded by the workman's union that the workman workedcontinuouslyw.e.f. 01.04.92 to 31.03.93 i.e. 254days which has been accepted by the management vide their application dated 08.08.2007 , paper No. C- 17; but this Tribunal has to consider whether the workman concerned had worked for 240 days preceding the date of alleged . termination i.e. 14.08.2004 . From the perusal ofthe record, there is no pleading regarding working from 14.08.2004to 13.08.2003 , neither in the statement of claim nor any evidence regarding the same . There is only a vague statement ofthe workman that he continuously worked up to 14.08.2004. Since the workman's union in para 10 of its statement of claim has pleaded that the workman was terminated on 14.08.2004 and the reference order was also issued to the effect ; accordingly, it was workman's union to substantiate this fact the workman actually worked for 240 days in the relevant period of time . Initial burden of establishing the fact of continuous work for 240 days in a year i.e. 13.08.2003 to 14.08.2004 was on the workman's union but it has failed to discharge the above burden . There is no reliable material for recording findings that the workman had worked for more than 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his alleged termination and the alleged unjust or illegal order oftermination was passed by the management .

17.Accordingly, the reference is adjudicated against the workman's union and I come to the conclusion that the workman , Shyam Narayan is not entitled to any relief.

18. Award as above .

LUCKNOW.

07.10.2011 .

(Dr. MANJU NIGAM) Presiding Officer

2011 नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर,

का०आ० 3400 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय -2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/22 ऑफ 2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल०-12011/82/2010 - आईआर ( बी 2 ) ] रगेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O.3400- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government herebypublishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 2 /22 of 2011 ) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court- 2, MUMBAI now as shown in the Annexure in the IndustrialDispute between the employers in relation to the

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 21/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011/82/2010- IR(B- II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑKE PresidingOfficer

REFERENCE NO.CGIT- 2/22 OF 2011 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

TheDy.General Manager Central Bank of India Zonal Office No. 317 , M.G Road Pune (MS).

AND

THEIR WORKMEN

TheGeneral Secretary Central Bank Employees ' Association C/o . Central Bank of India

SatpurBranch P -63 , MIDC Satpur Nasik (MS) 422007.

APPEARANCES :

FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. L.L.D'Souza, Representative.

FOR THE WORKMEN : No appearance.

Mumbai , dated the 3rd October, 2011 .

AWARD

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L- 12011 /82/2010 - IR (B - II) , dated 11.05.2011 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 Lave referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether theprocess ofinquiry and the punishment inflicted upon Shri S.B. Potdar, Daftry by the management of Central Bank of India is proper, correct and justified ? What relief and actual privileges is the workman entitled to? " 2.Notices were issued to both the parties . However second party though duly served , remained absent.

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Registered AD receipt to that effect is at Ex - 4 . The second party union did not appear and file the statement of claim . Without Statement of claim , the reference cannot be decided on merits and the same deserves to be dismissed . Thus I pass the following order:

ORDER

Reference stands dismissed for want of prosecution .

Date : 03.10.2011

K.B: Katake

Presiding Officer/ Judge नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3401 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जवाहरलाल नेहरू पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय -1 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -1/01 ऑफ 2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल०-31011 / 14/2004- आईआर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3401 .-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award ( Ref. No. CGIT- 1 /01 OF 2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court - 1 , MUMBAI now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L- 31011 / 14/2004- IR ( B - II ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , MUMBAI JUSTICE GS . SARRAF

Presiding Officer

REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 1 / 1 OF 2005 Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust

AND

Their Workmen

APPEARANCES :

For the Management : Shri Lancy D'Souza , Management Representative .

8695

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

For the Union

: Shri Jai Prakash Sawant , Adv For Speedy

Transport Pvt . Ltd. : Mr. Kapadia

ForCentral

Warehousing

: Absent

Corporation

State

: Maharashtra

Mumbai , dated the 05th day of October . 2011.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section ( 2 - A ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 the Central Government has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal . Whether there is any employer -employee relationship exists between the management of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust ( JNPT ) Navi Mumbai and Shri Raghunath Dinkar Deshmukh and 23 other Security Guards engaged through the Central Warehousing Corporation CFS Navi Mumbai ? If so , whether the demand made by Nhava Sheva Port and General Workers Union for absorption and regularisation of the said workmen in the regular service of JNPT is justified and what relief are they entitled to?

2. Learned counsel for the Second party union has filed an application with the prayer that this Tribunal may dispose of the present reference for want of prosecution and the second party be given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance .

3. Learned counsel for the first party has no objection ifthe reference is decided in terms of the application filed by the second party union .

4. In view of the above application of the second party union it is clear that the second party union is not entitled to any relief in these proceedings .

5 The matter stands disposed of as above and the second party union is given liberty to take appropriate steps at an appropriate time for redressal of its grievance . AnAward is made accordingly.

JUSTICE GS . SARRAF, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3402 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/एनजीपी 170/2006 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -12012 / 39/ 2006- आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 8696

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3402.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT'NGP/ 70 / 2006 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , NAGPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman , which was received by the Central Government or 21/10/2011 .

[No. L - 12012/392006- IR (B - II ) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM - LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR Case No. CGIT / NGP / 70 / 2006

Date: 07.10.2011 .

Party No. 1 : The Zonal Manager , Bank ofIndia , Kingsway, Nagpur

Versus

Party No. 2 : Shri Sunil S/ o . Vinayak Kokje , 374, Gandhinagar , Nagpur (M.S. )

AWARD

(Dated: 07th Octobe , 2011 ) In exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 (A) of Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) ( " the Act " in short) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management ofBank of India and their workman, Shri Sunil S/o. Vinayak Kokje , for adjudication , as per letter No. L- 12012/ 39/ 2006 - IR ( B - II ) dated 07.08.2006 , wth the following schedule:

"Whether the action ofthe management of the Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Sunil S/o . Vinayak Kokje from the post of Cash- Cum- Accounts-Clerk by way of compulsory retirenent is legal and justified ? If not, to what extent the workman is entitled for relief?

2. After receipt of the reference , the parties vere noticed file their respective statement of claim and written statement , in response to which , the workman , Shri Sunil Vinayak Kokje ( " the workman " in short ) filed his statement ofclaim and the management of Bank of India ( " the party no. 1 " in short ) filed the written statement .

The workman in his statement of claim has pleaded inter-alia that the party no . 1 is a nationalized bank and the service conditions of the nationalized banks including the party no. 1 are governed by the provisions of Sastry

(ii) ]

[PART II-SEC . 3 Award, Desai Award and bi - partite settlements and he came to be appointed as s clerk wie.f. 08.02.85 and while he was working at Sitabuldi , Nagpur branch , he was served with the charge sheet dated 28.08.2004 by the Disciplinary Authority and the said authority also ordered departmental enquiry and appointed Shri N.A. Kala as the enquiry officer and the enquiry officer after conclusion of the departmental enquiry, submitted his report dated 30.11.2004 to the Disciplinary Authority and the Disciplinary Authority after issuing show cause notice and after giving him personal hearing , inflicted the punishment of compulsory retirement vide order dated 19.01.2005 and thus , his service came to be terminated by way of compulsory retirement we.f. 19.01.2005 and he filed an appeal against the order of punishment before the Appellate Authority but the appeal was dismissed on 20.04.2005 and as such , he raised the industrial dispute .

It is further averred by the workman that the order of compulsory retirement from service is neither legal nor justified , as because the charge No. 1 against him was in respect of remaining unauthorized absence from 08.03.2004 to 19.06.2004 , but during that period , he was sick and under the treatment of the doctor and the certificates of eminent doctors , Dr. Jitendra Taori and Dr. R.M. Ballal were produced during the course of the enquiry to substantiate the reason ofhis absence, but the enquiry officer without application of mind, casually declared the charge as proved and the charge no. II against him was in respect of misutilisation of banks Credit Card No. 5420 3430 1052 8902 , but the allegations made in the said charge do not constitute a misconduct , as defined by the Bi - partite settlement and the third charge against him was pertaining the cash - credit limitsanctioned by the bank to his wife , Mrs. Bharti Sunil Kokje and he was the guarantor to the said loan and the activities , for which the loan sanctioned to his wife , came to be closed and there was outstanding against the said loan and according to the allegations in the charge , he failed to intimate the bank about ceasation of the business ofhis wife and the materials on which the charge was framed cannot be construed to be a misconduct and did not constitute misconduct and charge no . IV as given in the charge sheet was regarding incurring excessive debts and the enquiry officer without application of mind and without considering the relevant evidence declared the charge to be proved and under colorable exercise of power management framed the charge and punished him and the entire action is unsustainable in law and unjustified .

It is also pleaded by the workman that the findings of the enquiry officer were without any proper reasoning and were not at all based on the facts and evidence produced before him and the same were given in a most mechanical manner , without application of mind and therefore , the findings are perverse and the Disciplinary Authority also failed to consider the above aspects and erroneously accepted the findings and passed the impugned [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

order and the short comings in the findings of the enquiry officer were painted out before the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority but the Disciplinary Authority and the Appeilate Authority did not consider the same and as such , the order impugned is liable to be set aside and even otherwise , the quantum of punishment is not commensurating with the gravity of the misconduct and is prima facie harsh and shocking . The workman has prayed to set aside the order of compulsory retirement , for reinstatement in service with full back wages , seniority and all consequential benefits .

3. The party no . 1 , in its written statement has not disputed the submission of the charge sheet against the workman , conducting of the departmental enquiry, imposition of the punishment of compulsory retirement against him and dismissal of the appeal filed by him against the order of punishment , by the Appellate Authority. However , it has pleaded that the punishment imposed against the workman is legal and justified and the enquiry officer after analyzing the entire evidence on record came to the conclusion that all the four charges have been proved and his findings are based on the materials placed before him and the evidence on record and after receipt of the report of the enquiry officer , it issued a show cause notice to the workman and he duly submitted his reply on 13.01.2005 and after hearing the workman personally and considering the entire enquiry papers , the enquiry report and the explanation submitted by the workman to the show cause notice , the Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 19.01.2005 , imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement and the Appellate Authority also considered all the aspects in general and the evidence and the submission made by the workmans while rejecting the appeal and the order of punishment of compulsory retirement imposed against the workman is appropriate and just punishment , as the misconducts committed by the workman were grave misconducts and the workman is not entitled to any relief.

4. It is necessary to mention here that , as this is a case of termination of the services of the workman , by way of compulsory retirement , after holding of a departmental enquiry, order was passed to consider the validity of the departmental enquiry was taken as a preliminary issue . However , on 12.10.2010 , a pursis was filed on behalf of the workman stating that the workman does not challenge the validity of the departmental enquiry. So , the departmental enquiry conducted against the workman was held to be legal and proper and the case was posted for hearing on the questions of perversity of findings of the enquiry officer and the proportionality of the punishment .

5. At the time of argument , it was contented by the learned advocate for the workman that the finding of the enquiry officer are perverse and the first charge leveled against the workman was that he remained unauthorized absent from 08.03.2004 to 19.06.2004 and the reasoning

8697

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

given for the said absence was false as he used his master card during such absence and the findings of the enquiry officer are that the leave was taken by the workman on false ground and the claim made by the workman that he was immobile is also false , ground of illness was mentioned by the workman because he utilized the master card several times during the said period and the conclusions drawn by the enquiry officer are perverse and is a case of total non- application of mind, as the enquiry officer did not consider the documentary evidence i.e. the medcial certificates produced by the workman and the transactions for which, the master card was used , pertained to hotel bills for home delivery of food items and without considering the vital evidence , the enquiry officer reached the incorrect decision and for that the said findings are perverse .

Itwas further submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that the second charge against the workman is regarding the transactions made by the workman with the master card and the said card was given to the workman as a customer of the Bank and not as an employee of the Bank and the entire transaction attract the relationship other than employer -employee and therefore cannot be treated as misconduct , under the provisions of the Bi - partite settlement . In support of such submission , reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court reported in 2005 LAB L.C. 2858 ( Ramesh Reghunayak Chavan Vs. Bank of India and others ) .

6. The learned advocate for the workman also submitted that the third charge does not sustain scrutiny of law and there was no act even alleged against the workman which can construe misconduct and the workman was a guarantor to a loan granted by the Bank to his wife and non - payment of loan and any matter incidental to the said loan granted by the Bank to a third party gives rise to civil liability and the same cannot be treated as misconduct and the findings given by the enquiry officer heavily suffer from non application of mind and findings are perverse .

The further submission made by the learned advocate for the workman is that the fourth charge against the workman is regarding borrowing of money and to be a borrower is not miconduct as per Bi - partite settlement and only excessive borrowing can be said to be miconduct and there is no evidence on record to support that the borrowing of the workman was excessive and the totality of the facts and circumstances , it is manifestly clear that the findings of the enquiry officer are perverse and the punishment is shockingly disproportionate .

The learned advocate for the workman placed reliance on the decisions reported in 1995 - II LLN 508 (Babanrao Vs. Adinath Sahakari Bank Ltd. ) and 2010 ( 1 ) ALL MR - 65 ( Shri Shriram V. Deshpande Vs. The Presiding Officer , CGIT, Jabalpur ) .

7. Per contra , the advocate for the party no . 1 8698

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

submitted that the enquiry officer has given detailed reasons in support of the conclusions arrived at by him and the workman remained absent unauthorizedly from 08.03.2004 and in reply to the telegram sent by the Manager ofSitabuldi Branch dated 25.03.2004, the workman intimated by his letter dated 27.03.2004 to be unable to join duties due to his sickness but he did not submit any medical certificate and the workman did not get himself examined by the doctor of the Bank as directed vide telegrarn dated 08.04.2004 and did not resume duties on 17.04.2004 , as intimated by him in his letter dated 06.04.2004 to the bank and as such , on 10.05.2004 , the explanation ofthe workman was called for, for remaining unauthorized absence and though the workman alleged that he was sick and unable to attend duty due to sickness, he was using the credit card extensively during the said period, creating extensive overdraft in his savings account and for that vide memorandum dated 10.05.2004, the Branch Manager asked the workman to explain about the creation of over draft in saving account in addition to unauthorized absence and as the explanation submitted by the workman was not satisfactory, departmental enquiry was initiated and the first charge included two distinct misconduct, firstly unauthorized absence and secondly knowingly making false statement and after taking into consideration the documentary and oral evidence adduced in the enquiry, the enquiry officer rightly held the charge to have been proved against the workman and the findings are not perverse and the findings of the enquiry officer on the other three charges are also not perverse and the findings given by the enquiry officer in his enquiry report are perfectly justified and after due consideration of oral as well as documentary evidence produced before him during the course of the enquiry and the punishment imposed is perfectly justified, considering the nature and gravity of the misconducts committed by the workman , hence the workman is not entitled for any relief.

In support of the contentions , the learned advocate for the party no. 1 relied on the decisions reported in 2002 III CLR - 713 ( Radhakrisnan Nair Vs. State of Kerala ) , 2004 LAB IC - 1634 ( Bhagwan Singh Vs. Food Corpn . of India ) , 2004 III CLR - 240 ( Dilip Sagar Vs. Deputy General Manager, Syndicate Bank ) , 2008 SCC - 224 ( L & T Kamastu Ltd. Vs. N. India) , AIR 2004 SC - 4161 ( Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sardar Singh ) , AIR 2005 SC - 1993 ( Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Narwade ) , AIR 2006 SC- 2208 ( General Secretary, South India Cashew Factories Workers Union Vs.Managing Director ) , 2008 ( 5 ) Mah . L.J. 570(West Bokaro Colliery Vs. Ram Pravesh Singh ) and 2005 (3 ) Mah. L.J. - 105 (Tata Infomedia Ltd. Vs. Tata Press Employees United).

8.Before delving into the merit of the case , I think it apropos to mention some of the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court regarding the power and jurisdiction of the Tribunals and Courts in regard to interference in the findings and punishment imposed

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] against the delinquents in the departmental proceedings .

Inthe decision reported in (2008 ) 1 SCC - 115 (Supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court have held that , " Labour law- Industrial Disputes Act , 1947-S. 11 - A- Inference by tribunals and courts-Scope-Where the workmen removed from service had challenged only the conclusions reached by the enquiry officer and the quantum of punishment but not the legality or fairness of the enquiry proceedings , held, Labour Court could not examine the findings of the enquiry officer and hold that the charge was not proved. " 9. Inthedecision reported in 1996 I CLR- 389 ( Supra) , the Hon'bleApex Court has held that: --

" Judicial Review: Power of Court or Tribunal- Disciplinary proceeding-Appellant held guilty of misconduct being in possession of unexplained disproportionate assets- Whether Court or Tribunals canre-appreciate the evidence and come to a different finding-After reviewing the case law on the point , it is held that it is the domain of appreciation of evidence and the court/tribunal has no power to appreciate the evidence and reach its own contra conclusion .

Disciplinary proceeding - Dismissal of employee on proofofmisconduct - Adequacy and reliability-Held thatneither technical rules of evidence nor proof of fact or evidence as defined therein apply to disciplinary proceedings and adequacy and reliability of evidence cannot be permitted to be canvassed before the High Court/Tribunal .

Punishment by Disciplinary Authority- When High Court or Tribunal can interfere - Held that High Court/ Tribunal, while exercising the power ofjudicial review, cannot normally substitute its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty unless the punishment impose by the Disciplinary Authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/ Tribunal." Keeping in view, the principles enunciatedby the Hon'ble courts in the decisions , on which reliance has been placed by the parties , the present case at hand is to be considered.

10. The first charge against the workman is in regard to his remaining unauthorized absent from 08.03.2004 to 19.06.2004. The findings of the enquiry officer , in regard to said charge are that the workman applied for leave on false ground of illness , as because the workman had used the master card on many occasions during the said period and such fact shows that the workman was not ill and he was mobile. It was submitted on behalf of the workman that such finding is preverse and the enquiry officer did not consider the documents filed by the workman in support ofhis illness . However, on perusal of the documents ofthe enquiry proccedings , it is found that the enquiry officer 8699 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

"So far as misuse of the credit card/ India card is point out that this is purely a Civil Act unconnected with misconduct . The card is given not as an employee but a facility that is available to anybody who is interested in obtaining credit card from the Bank. "

In this case , it is the admitted case of the workman that the credit card was used by him beyond the spending limit and due to such use of the card , there was overdraft in his account. It is also found that to clear the debit balance the workman deposited a cheque of Rs . 50,000/- but the cheque was returned unpaid for the reason that the account in respect of the said cheque was already closed . As the facts and circumstances of the case are quite different from the facts and circumstances of the case mentioned in the judgement , with respect , I am of the view that the judgement has no clear application to the present case .

12. So far the other two charges are concerned , it is found that the reasons assigned by the enquiry officer in support of his findings are reasonable . The enquiry officer has analyzed the evidence adduced by the parties in the enquiry in a disproportionate manner and his findings are not based on any extraneous materials . Moreover , the workman has not challenged the fairness of the departmental enquiry . So applying the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the decisions already mentioned above , to the present case at hand , it can be held that the findings are not perverse and the punishment imposed against the workman is not shockingly disproportionate to the proved charges against him in a properly held departmental enquiry , calling for any interference . Hence , it is ordered:

ORDER

The action of the management of the Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri Sunil S/ o . Vinayak Kokje from the post of Cash- Cum-Accounts- Clerk by way of compulsory retirement is legal and justified . The workman is not entitled for any relief.

J.P. CHAND , Presiding Officer did take into consideration the documents filed by the workman in support of his illness and by assigning cogent reasons he has held that the plea of the workman that he was ill and immobile not to be true . Admittedly, the workman remained absent from duties without giving any intimation or information to the Bank . He also did not submit any application for leave before remaining absent or soon after remaining absent . As no information was submitted by the workman , the Branch Manager of the Bank of Sitabuldi Branch , where the workman was working at that time sent a telegram to the workman to resume duty and in response to the said telegram , for the first time , the workman on 27.03.2004 submitted an application to the Bank about his inability to attend his duty due to suffering from slipped disc ailment . The workman was directed to get himself examined by the Bank's doctor but he avoided to consult the doctor of the Bank . From the documents submitted by the workman , it is found that for the first time , he obtained amedical certificate on 05.04.2004 from Dr. Jitendra B Taori about his suffering from acute Lumbo Sacral Strain . Subsequently , he also obtained other certificates from Dr. Taori and Dr. Ballal . According to the workman , he was advised by the doctors for rest and he was immobile during his illness , but it is found that the workman used his credit card (master card ) several times during the said period. According to the workman , he used the card for home delivery of food items and for his reputation , the hotel owners accepted the Master card even in his absence . But I do not find any force in such contentions , because it is common knowledge that for using the credit card (Master Card) , it is necessary for the card holder to present the card atthe counter of the concerned commercial establishment and the card is required to be swapped in the electronic machine and the card holder has to sign the bill generated by the electronics machine . The card cannot be used in absence of the card holder . As the card cannot be used without the card holder presenting the card himself at the commercial establishment , the plea of the workman that he was ill and immobile is found not to be true . Hence , it is found that the enquiry officer has rightly held the charge no . I to have been proved against the workman and the finding cannot be held as perverse .

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3403 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मोरमुगांव पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय-2 , मुम्बई के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/44 ऑफ 2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-10-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

| संख्या एल 36011/3/2006 आई, आर , ( बी-2 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी 11. So far the 2nd charge is concerned , it was contended by the learned advocate for the workman that the said charge is in regard to use of the Master Card by the workman and the said card was issued by the Bank to the workman as a client and as such , the relationship arising out of the transactions is that of a Banker and customer and not of employer - employee and as such , use of the said card in excess of the spending limit cannot be treated as a misconduct , under the provisions of the Bi - partite settlement . In support of such contentions reliance was placed on the decision reported in 2005 LAB.1.C. - 2858 (Supra ) . In the said decision , the Hon'ble Court have held that:

4182G1 /11-21 8700

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3403.in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT- 2/44 of2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal /Labour Court-2, MUMBAI now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Mormugao Port Trust and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 21/10/2011.

[No. L-36011/3/2006- IR(B -II) ]

RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRALGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 2, MUMBAI

PRESENT

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ

PresidingOfficer

REFERENCE NO . CGIT - 2/44 of2006 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MORMUGAO PORTTRUST

The Chairman

Mormugao Port Trust

Mormugao Harbour

Goa-403 803

AND

THEIR WORKMEN .

The General Secretary

GoaPort and Dock Workers Organisation

Shetye Sankul , 3rd floor Tisk -Ponda Goa .

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. M.B. Anchan ,

Advocate.

FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr.P. Gaonkar,

Representative.

Mumbai , dated the 29th August, 2011

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employmentby its Order No. L-36011 /3 /2006- IR (B - II ) , dated 20.07.2006 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 (A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ] adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Mormugao Port Trust, Goa in not restoring increment of Shri Rui Gudinho , Works Clerk after 3 years of penalty as per their order dated 04.08.2002 (Апnex.III) is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for?' 2. After receipt of the reference, both the parties were served with notices . They appeared through their representatives . The second party union has filed its statement of claim at Ex- 7 .According to it , the first party is one of the major port trusts in India. Shri Gudinho is an employee of first party. On 4.8.1992, first party awarded punishment of reduction of pay of Mr. Gudinho by four stages from 1485 to 1325 in the time scale pay of Rs . 1165- 40-1485-1935 for a period of3 years with immediate effect . Itwas further directed that Shri Gudinho would not earn increments ofpay during that period of reduction and that onexpiry of that period the reduction will have the effect of postponinghis furture increments of pay. After completion of the three years period of punishment, inspite of representations of the second party, the first party did not take any positive steps to restore the four increments and the annual increment . Therefore the workman has approached ALC ( C) through their union . He called both the parties for conciliation . The first party agreed in conciliationto restore the reduction of pay by four stages . However they have not restored the annual increments of the said three years . As they have not added the increments of three years in the basic pay, the workman therefore submits that he is entitled for restoration of 3 increments postponed for three years after completion of three years of punishment awarded to him . Therefore he prays for direction to the first party to release the annual increments immediately after completion of three years ofpunishment and also prays for the cost of the reference.

3. The first party resisted the reference vide its written statement at Ex- 8 .According to them , a departmental inquiry was initiated against the workman under reference . He was held guilty and by way of punishment , his increments for three years were withheld. The workman was aggrieved by the order and raised industrial dispute through union. According to the management there is no restoration of increment in terms of the order or penalty. After the period of penalty, the workman has earned fresh increments from the stage of reduction ofhis pay.Therefore there was no restoration of the four increments . The union has not challenged the inquiry or the findings of the inquiry officer. The management therefore prays that the action of the management is legal and justified and that the workman is not entitled to any relief. Thus prays that the reference be dismissed with cost .

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

4. Following are the issues framed by my ID predecessors . I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:

Issues

Findings Sr. No.

Does not arise ..

1 Whether the action of management in not granting increment after 3 years punishment is legal ?

No. 2 Whether second party is entitled to the increments ?

3 What order ?

As per final order .

REASONS

Issues nos . 1 & 2 :

5. In this respect , the Id adv for the first party submitted that after completion of the period of three years , the increments of the workman were released and he was even paid the arrears to the tune of Rs . 1,35,979/ - The Id adv for the first party pointed out the reply in cross examination of the second party workman at Ex - 21 page 3 thereof, wherein the workman has admitted that since his increment was not released after three years , he approached to ALC ( C ) Vasco Goa. He further admitted that , settlement was arrived at in that proceeding . As a result of the said settlement , he was paid an amount of Rs . 1,35,979/ - in February 2006. The I adv for the first party thus argued that , as the arrears were paid , and settlement was arrived at before Conciliation Officer , there is no scope to proceed with the reference at hand . In this respect I would like to point out that the workman himself has admitted in his cross that after the period of punishment of three years , as his increments were not released , he had approached to ALC ( C ) , Vasco , Goa . He has admitted that , there was settlement between them and he received an amount of Rs . 1,35 , 979 / - . In the circumstances in fact there is no scope to the workman to claim any further relief as not only his increments were released but he was also paid arrears thereof. His increments for three years were withheld by way of penalty for the said period of three years . The said order of management withholding the increments based on the report of inquiry officer was not challenged by the workman . Therefore question of granting increment of the said period of three years does not arise . The increments were released after the period of three years as per the conciliation agreement signed by both the parties . Therefore I hold that the issue no . 1 does not arise as increments were already released after the period of three years of the period of penalty . In this backdrop , I hold that the second party workman is not entitled to any relief as claimed for. Accordingly I decide this issue No. 2 in the negative and proceed to pass the following order:

8701

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

ORDER

cost . The reference stands dismissed with no order as to Dated: 29th August 2011 .

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3404 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947. (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार केनरा बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण / श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 37/2006) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21-10-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ संख्या एल -12012/ 56/ 2006- आईआर ( बी -2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3404.-.in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 37/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , BANGALORE now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Canara Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 21.10.2011 .

[No. L - 12012 56 2006- IR( B - II ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM- COURT, BANGALORE

Dated : 10the October . 2011

PRESENT SHRI S.N. NAVALGUND PRESIDING OFFICER C.R. No. 37/2006

I PARTY

II PARTY

The Genernal Magager ( P) , Canara Bank . Head Office . ( Personnel Wing) . 112. J.C. Road . BANGALORE - 560 002 Shri C. Krishnappa , S/ o Late Shri Chinnapillappa . No. 6 , Uttarahalli Colony. Subramanayapura Post . BANGALORE - 560 061

AWARD

1. The Central Government by exercising the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - sectiion ( 1 ) and sub section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act . 1947 ( 14 of 8702

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/ AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

1947) has referred this dispute vide order No. L- 12012/56/ 2006-IR( B- II) dated 13th September, 2006 for adjudication on the following Schedule:

THE SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Canara Bank in imposition of punishment of compulsory retirement from the services of the bank of the workman Shri C. Krishnappa, Ex . Sub Staff, Canara Bank, Uttarahalli Branch, Bangalore w.e.f. 17.5.2005 islegal and justified? If not to what reliefhe is entitled and from which date ? "

2. Shri C. Krishnappa S/ o late Channapillappa (hereinafter referred as the first party for the sake of convenience) who joined the services of Canara Bank (herein after referred as Second Party) during February 1988 as sub staffand on corupletion of4 years probationary period came to be confirmed and was allotted with staff No. 56608 and by promotion re - designated as Cash Peon , while he was serving at Second Party's regional office, Kolar he was served with notice dated 29.9.2004 copy of which is at Ex . MEX. I to the effect that on three occasions shortage of cash was noticed when he was serving as Cash Peon at its Uttarahalli branch on deputation and on two occasions he came out with the said missing cash saying that it was lying here and there and once he was made to suffer the Cash Clerk and on his reply denying the said allegations made in the notice by his reply dated 3.11.2004 copy ofwhich is at Ex. MEX 2, being not satisfied with the said reply the second party served charge sheet onhim as under and appointed Shri M.S. Bhat, Sr. Manager as enquiry officer and Shri B.K. Ramesh as Prsenting officer by order dated 27th December 2004:-

CHARGE SHEET

"You are working as Sub - staff at our Regional Office , Kolar for 1.10.2004 . Earlier you were on deputation to our Uttarahalli baranch , Bangalore , from Hanumanthanagar branch , Bangalore.

Our Uttarahalli branch , Bangalore , have reported to our staff section , Circle office , Bangalore that there was a cash shortage of Rs . 10,000/-on 1.09.2004 . A detailed investigation conducted into the matter has revealed the following:

You were working as Cash Peon at our Uttarahalli branch, Bangalore.

On 1.09.2004, Shri Ragha ondra, Clerk who was handling cash department , had handed over Rs . 3,27 lakhs to you for stitching /bundling purpose on closure of cash , after noting down the denominations , which included 1100 pieces of Rs . 100/ - denomination. When Shr: Raghavendra found shortage of one section of Rs . 100/ - i.e. Rs . 10,000/- in the cash given to you for stitching ,

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)] he enquired about the same with you and you have pleaded your ignorance about any shortage of cash . The efforts made to locate the missing cash did not yield and result .

You had left the cash cabin on 2 or 3 occassions after the cash was handed over to you for stitching , stating the reason as searching for cash wrappers, ordering of coffeee , etc. When enquired as to why you had gone out of the branch , when the cash was given to you , had replied that whatever the cash giver. to you was kept there and you do not know anything.

During the course of investigation at about 6.30 pm on 01.09.2004, you came out after searching cash cabin and double lock room and told that the cash bundle was laying on the floor and handed over Rs . 10,000/- and then the cash was tallied for the day.

Earlier on two occasions also , there were similar incidents of missing of cash , when the cash was given to you for stitching .

On 21.05.2004 , Shri Parameshwara , Clerk who was working as Cashier, had reported shortage of Rs . 10,000/- and on verirving it was observed that one Rs . 100/- packet was missreg and despite making theirbest efforts , the missing cash could no be traced. You were the cash peon on that day, and on enquiring, you have informed that you have stitched whatever cash was given to you. You went on leave the next day i.e. 22.05.2004.

Smt . Sudha , Clerk , while working as Cashier on 26.08.2004, had reported shortage of one section of Rs. 100/-denomination, amounting to Rs . 10,000/-in the cash given to you for stitching , as you were working as cash Peon on that day also . When she made enquiries about the same , you started searching and located a section of Rs . 100/- allegedly lying between single lock box and wall .

From the above , it is clear that there was cash shortage at our Uttarahalli branch on 3 occasions and on all the occasions , the missing cash was Rs . 10,000/ - involving one packet of Rs . 100/ - denomination . On all the occasions , you were the Cash Peon, though Cashiers were different and missing of cash was noticed only after handling over cash to you for stitching. Out of 3 occasions of missing cash , on two occasions when the Cashiers confronted you emphatically, you returned the cash onthe plea that the same was traced by you and yet onanother occassion, Shri Parameshwara, Clerk had to make good the loss of cash.

By your above action , you have deliberately caused missing of cash from the cash given to you for [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 (ii ) ]

stitching with an ulterior motive , which touches upon your honesty and integrity .

Out staff section , circle office , Bangalore , vide their letter No. BLC/ SSW/ 0934 / EP / Cash . Shtg/2004 dated 29.09.2004 , called for an explanation in the matter from you . The reply submitted by you vide your letter dated 3.11.2004 , is neither convincing nor satisfactory.

You have , by your above action failed to discharge your duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and thus contravened the provisions ofChapter XI Regulation 2 (A) ( i ) of Canara Bank Service Code and committed a " Gross Misconduct " .

By your above actions you have also willfully caused damage to the property of the bank and thus committed 'Gross Misconduct' within the meaning ofChapter XI Regulation 3 Clause (j ) of Canara Bank Service Code.

All your above action being prejudicial to the interest ofthe bank, you have committed a 'Gross misconduct, ' within the meaning of Chapter XI , Regulation 3 Clause (m) of Canara Bank Service Code . "

3. The enquiry officer while fixing the enquiry on 23.11.2004 cause notice on the first party to appear before him on that day and on that day on appearance of the first party along with Shri R.V. Sheshadari as his DR and denying the charges and the presenting officer examining the six witnesses and getting 13 documents as Ex . MEX. 1 to 13 , the detailed description of which are narrated in the annexure , on the submission made by the first party and his DR that they have no evidence to adduce in the enquiry closed the enquiry and after receiving written briefs from the Presenting Officer and the DR submitted his findings to the Disciplinary Authority on 24.03.2005 holding the first party guilty of the charges . Then the Disciplinary Authority by letter dated 24.03.2005 forwarded the enquiry findings to the first party for his submission and the first party submitted his submission dated 05.04.2005 along with letter dated 08.04.2005 of the Defence Representative while giving notice of personal hearing on 04.05.2005 providing personal hearing on 10.05.2005 passed the impugned punishment of compulsory retirement dated 17.05.2005 and the Appellate Authority while giving the first party personal hearing on 6.10.2005 confirmed the order of the Disciplinary Authority against which the first party raised the dispute and on its failure the Central Government made this reference for adjudication .

4. Since the fairness or otherwise of the domestic enquiry has been answered in favour of the second party by order dated 18.03.2011 , after receiving the evidence of the enquiry officer for the management and the first party and hearing the arguments of their learned advocates and

8703

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

first party gave his oral evidence on victimization and the arguments of the learned advocates appearing for both the sides were heard on merits the issues now remains for my consideration are :

( 1) Whether the finding of the enquiry officer holding the first party guilty of the charges leveled against him is perverse requiring the interference of this tribunal?

(2) If not . Whether the punishment of Compulsory Retirement imposed by the DisciplinaryAuthority and confirmed by the Appellate Authority is disproportionate to the charges proved?

(3 ) What Order ?

5. During the course of arguments the learned counsel appearing for the first party while taking me through the charges leveled against the first party and the evidence adduced by the management through six witnesses urged that is undisputable when the first party was entrusted with he work of bundling currency he was sent to bring coffee and after he bundled and handed over the currency to the cashier and the cashier found 100 denominations being missing , after tharough search same was traced beneath the cashier counter and the evidence of MW1 , Shri GS . V. Babu being formal for getting exhibited the copy of the notice served on the first party dated 29.09.2004 and he reply given by him as Ex . MEX . 1 & 2 respectively there was nothing to cross - examine him and in the evidence of MW2 to a 6 absolutely there being nothing to impute any mischief to the first party and moreover there being no evidence that he was actually entrusted with a sum of Rs . , 3,27,000/ - by cashier MW6 , Shri S. Raghavendra , Clerk , only because he found shortage of cash after bundling by the first party which shortage later came to be traced by the first party himself who bundled the cash nothing could be attributed to the first party as such the enquiry officer on the basis of such evidence of MW1 to 6 holding the first party guilty of the charges is perverse and deserves to be set aside . He also urged that since the first party is without any job , being arbitrarily compulsory retired from service without any basis he is entitle for reinstatement with full back wages and other consequential benefits .

6. Inter alia the learned advocate appearing for the second party urged that the evidence on record since do indicate that on three occasions when the first party was working at Uttarahalli branch Rs . 10,000/- on each occasions were found short and on one occasion the cashier himself was forced to make it good and on two occasions he (the first party) himself brought the cash saying that it was found here and there , it suggests that he was in the habit oftaking out money from the currency entrusted to him for bundling and attempted to knock offer the money of the bank bringing the cashier on the relevant day into trouble and thereby committed gross misconduct as such the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed against him 8704

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011/AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

is proper and there is no necessity of this tribunal to interfere either in the finding ofthe enquiry officer or in the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority confirmed by the Appellate Authority. The learned advocate appearing for the first party in support of his argument relied on the decision reported in 2009 ( II ) LLJ (SC) whereas the learned advocate appearing for the second party relied on the decisions reported in 1999 (2 ) LLJ Kar DB. P. 155 , AIR 2005 SC page 3272, (2005) 8 SCC Page428. AIR 2000 SC 3129, AIR 1997 SC Page 2661 and 1995( 1 ) LLJ Kar DB Page 1076.

7. On appreciation of the pleadings , oral and documentary evidence brought on record in the domestic enquiry, findings of the enquiry officer in the light of the arguments addressed by the learned advocates appearing forboth the sides my finding on point No. 1 & 2 are in the Affirmative for reasons stated hereafter, I am of the considered view that the first party is entitle for reinstatement with full back wages and other consequential benefits for the following reasons:

REASONS

With regard to the charges leveled against the first party he has stated in his claim statement on 01.09.2004 around 4 pm he was called by the then Cashier Mr. Raghavendra . S/MW6 and instructed to stitch the cash bundles and as usual he took the pockets from the cashier for stitching and in the meanwhile the then acting Manager, Mr. Anjanappa who had come on deputation from Kadandarampuram Branch , Bangalore ordered to bring coffee to all staff members and despite ofhis resistance he was ordered to obey his direction in a raised voice and left without any option informing the cashier he moved out to bring coffee and at the end of the day after completion of thebuilding of notes entrusted to him stitched and handed over to the cashier, the cashier complained there being shortage of one section of 100 denomination and without making the serve search the manager immediately telephoned the administrative office and called investigators and after tharough check the missed cash bundle was found beneath the cash table of the cashier and the cash work was successfully completed at the end of the day and in spite of it with an ulterior motive of harassing him the Incharge Branch Manager summoned him in his cabin and in the presence of the Investigation Officers Shri Guruprasad and Mr. Mustak Ahmed attributed him that the disappearance of cash section was due to his negligence and he would be taught a bitter lesson for the lapse and when he resisted to such allegations the investigators informed that a letter has to be submitted stating the reasons for the disappearance of cash section or else the matter will be reported to the police authorities for suitable action and being a native of Uttarahalli got very much dissimilated to be in the custody of police and gave a statement in writing narrating the actual facts about

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii)]

thedisappearance of the Cash Section and later he received atransfer order on 26.09.2004 and with an ulterior motive of somehow removing him from service the management taking the statement of the cashiers of21.05.2004, 26.08.2004 and 1.09.2004 as per Ex.MEX . 11 , 12 & 13 to the effect that Rs. 10,000/- each were found missing on those dates and the first one was made good by the then Cashier himself and the second one and third one were traced by himself (the first party) a false charge sheet came to be served on him and on a farce of enquiry he has been compulsorily retired from service . It is an undisputed fact that as far as the missing of cash on two other occasions dated 21.05.2004 and 26.08.2004 no action was taken before the cash was found missing on 01.09.2004 and there is also no imputation bythe cashiers at relevant day who have been examined as MW4 and 5 against the first party for missing of the cash on those dates . As far as missing of cash on 01.09.2004 the evidence ofMW6 Shri S. Raghavendra the cashier on that day isonly relevant . According to him since 08.04.2004 he was working as cashier at Uttarahalli branch and on 1.09.2004 having found shortage of cash of Rs . 10.000/-at the end of the day he submitted the letter to the Manager , DA Cell as per Ex.M 13 which reads as under:-- "Sub:-Cash shortage of Rs . 10,000/-

Today at 4 pm on 1.9.2004 I gave for cash stitching 20 packets . The denomination is as follows:

500x400

200000/-

110000/-

50x300

15000/-

10x20

2000/-

3,27,000/-

At about 4 pm I called Mr. Krishnappa for cash stitching . He came inside and asked, have you noticed down the packet shell I take it. Then I replied yes , you take . After taking cash he went 2-3 times out. One time for searching cash wrappers another time tohotel for ordering coffee as per the instructions of the Manager. After returning from the hotel 2-3 persons were talking with him at his table . I called him why you gone out when I gave cash for stitching he replied that what you have given I kept there . I do not know. Like this once on 21.05.2004 happened at that time Mr. Parameshwara was the cashier. He enquired all the customers but could not get the cash . Whenhe returned cash I found one 100/- rupees section ofRs. 10,000/- was found short i.e. today on 1.09.2004." 8. In his cross examination he came out with a version thathe had given to the first party 20 packets of currency and as he returned only 19 packe he requested him to search and give back one more packet of Rs . 100/ - to which he replied as he do not know and that he has returned whatever he had given to him and in the meanwhile when 8705 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

this fact of shortage of Rs . 10,000/- was reported by him to the Manager in turn the manager reported to the Circle office instructing him to stay in the cabin only still circle office people come for investigation and after the investigators from circle office arrived he was asked to give in writing what ever happened on that day and accordingly he gave letter as per Ex . MEX . 13. But there is nothing in his evidence indicating that before entrusting the packets of currency to first party for stitching , he had counted the money and had prepared notes . After his cross examination by DR by way of re- examination it was elicited by the Presenting Officer that all efforts being made to locate missing packet by him and his colleagues , first party searched inside the cash cabin and found the packet containing the missing notes . But absolutely there is nothing in his evidence to impute any mala fides against the first party . Therefore , as far as missing of the pocket containing cash of Rs . 10,000 / -i.e . 100 notes of Rs . 100/- denomination on 1.09.2004 , by no stretch of imagination anything could be imputed or attributed to the first party.

9. MW4 Shri S. Parameshwara has deposed that he was working at Uttarahalli branch from 8.12.2003 to 14.07.2004 and that on 2.09.2004 he submitted his statement tothe Investigating Officer as per Ex . MEX . 11 and that he confirms the contents therein which reads as under :

10. In his cross examination he has categorically stated that he had no reasons to suspect any body for missing/ shortage of cash of Rs . 10,000/ - on 21.05.2004 and that he has made good that money. Similarly MW5 S. Sudha who stated that on 1.09.2004 as per the asking by the Investigating Officer Mr. Mustaq Ahmed ( MW3 ) , she has given her statement as per Ex . MEX . 12 and that when she found one section of Rs . 100/- was short she asked the sub staff (may be referring to the first party) , he searched the cash and after locating a section Rs . 100/ - and after stitching the same he handed over to her and that she cannot say whether this was intentional or unintentional . Thus absolutely there is nothing in her evidence as well to impute any thing against the first party. Therefore , only because cash ofRs . 10,000/- found short on 01.09.2004 by the cashier MW6 and cash of Rs . 10,000/- found short on 26.08.2004 by the then cashier MW5 were traced by the first party, it cannot be concluded without any circumstances against him that he intentionally made the packets of cash missing with an intention to take away the same . If at all the cashiers after getting the cash of the day bundled/ stitched through the first party found some amount being missing or short it cannot be straight away imputed to the first party whose duty was to stitch the bundle currency entrusted to him in the absence of any evidence that he was entrusted with all the money so received in the cash section . Since no employee can be punished on suspicion in the present case the impugned punishment is imposed only on suspicion it cannot be sustained . If at all the second party/ management noticed frequent missing of the cash by the cashiers after the bundling of the notes by the first party, it would have kept a watch over the work of the first party if at all it suspected his hand in such a missing/ short and catch him red handed . If at all there was a frequent missing/ shortage of the cash by the cashier after bundling of the notes by the first party a precaution would have been taken by the cashier or instructions could have been issued to the cashier by the branch manager to count and prepare note of the currency to be entrusted to the first party for bundling and in that event the management would have been able to confirm its suspicion against the first party and without doing any such effort straight away making such charge and holding him guilty of such charge on such type of evidence is unsustainable . Under the circumstances in my considered view the finding of the enquiry officer holding the first party guilty of the charges leveled against him on such material/ evidence is perverse and unsustainable .

" I was working at Uttarahalli Branch , Bangalore till 14.07.2004 . On 21.05.2004 I was working as a Cashier in Uttarahalli branch. There were heavy receipts and payments on that day . Due to that I could not complete the cash work till 4 pm . Shri Krishnappa, Daftry was continuously asking me from 3.30 pm onwards whether cash closed and ready for stitching . At about 4 pm I opened the cash cabin door to allow the daftry for stitching work . He took cash packets to his table and started stitching . During the stitching work he went out of cash cabin 2-3 times telling to take water in the sponge . I also observed that Shri Krishnappa had went out of the branch also. After some time when the stitching work is completed cash was handed over to me around 5 pm . On tallying the cash I found that Rs . 10,000/ - was short . On careful verification by all the staff members I observed that Rs . 100/- pocket was missing .All our efforts to trace the missing cash failed . On enquiry Mr. Krishnappa told whatever cash given to him is stitched . At my request our manager Shri Manjunath Naik has given his OD account cheque and the same is adjusted towards the shortage of cash at about 5.30 pm. After some time some partial payment given to him the balance will be settled in due course . In my entire service I never come across shortage of cash. I will try my best to do the cash work carefully and without any mistake. I surprised as to how the above cash shortage has accrued" .

12. Point No. 2: In view of my finding on point No. 1 this point infact does not survive for consideration at all . Even otherwise since the evidence brought by the management against the first party in the domestic enquiry just give rise to some suspicion against the first party, if it is acceptable , it may be said that he made an attempt to knock off the bank money bringing the cashiers into trouble 8706

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

butactually there is no loss of property to the bank to say itamounts to gross misconduct . As already adverted to by me above, when the circumstances given rise to suspect the first party the best way the management would have done was tokeep a watch on his work and to catch him red handed by any means known to law and then issue charge sheet against him and if it was proved impose the punishment like one now imposed . Even assuming for the sake of arguments , given circumstances gave rise to suspicion on the conduct of the first party and it amount to misconduct, the compulsory retirement for such act would be more harsh and at the most one or two increments would have been taken away by way of punishment . Under any circumstances the impugned punishment of compulsory retirement is harsh and not sustainable .

13. Inview ofmy finding on point No. 1 the impugned punishment of compulsory retirement inflicted by the management being unsustainable, the first party is entitle for reinstatement . Since the first party in his evidence by way of affidavit on victimization filed on 3.05.2011 has categorically stated that ever since his termination by way ofcompulsory retirement from service he is not gainfully employed elsewhere and that he has no source of income to eke out a living for himself and his dependent family members , nothing has been elicited in his cross examination except making a bald suggestion that he is gainfully employed elsewhere after the impugned punishment of compulsory retirement. Under these circumstances it is a fitcase to award full back wages with all consequential benefits to the first party.

14. In the result, " I pass the following award" .

AWARD

The action of the management of Canara Bank in imposing the punishment of Compulsory Retirement from the services ofthe bank of the workman Shri C. Krishnappa, Ex. Sub Staff, Canara Bank, Uttarahalli Branch , Bangalore w.e.f. 17.05.2005 is not legal and justified and that he is entitle for reinstatement with full back wages and consequential benefits that he would have earned in the absence of the impugned punishment.

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 10.10.2011)

S.N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer ANNEXURE : CRNO . 37/2006

List ofwitnesses examined by the management before the EnquiryOfficer

S/Shri/Smt

MWI 1. GS.V. Babu , Officer SS ( W) , CO , Bangalore

MW2 2. H.L. Manjunatha Naik , Manager , Uttarahalli

MW3 3. H.R. Mustaq Ahmed, Officer , Bangalore

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

MW4 4. S. Parameshwara , Clerk , Accounts Section , Bangalore

MW5 5. S. Sudha, Clerk , Uttarahalli Branch , Bangalore

MW6 6. S. Raghavendra, Clerk , Uttarahalli Branch

Documents exhibited for the Management before the EnquiryOfficer

1. Letter addressed to first party by the Manager, Canara Bank regarding alleged cash shortage of Rs. 10,000/-at their Uttarahalli branch on 1.09.2004 dated 29.09.2004 .

MEX - 1

MEX-2 2. Reply of the first partydated 03.11.2004

MEX- 3 3. Letter addressed to the Manager , Canara Bank Staff Section , Bangalore dated nil by the Manager, Uttarahalli Branch , Bangalore regarding Cash shortage of Rs . 10,000/- .

MEX-4 4. Investigation report submitted by Shri H.B. Mushtaq Ahmed , Officer dated 3.09.2004 in the matter of reported cash shortage occurred at Uttarahalli branch on 01.09.2004 .

MEX -5 5. Statement of first party dated 01.09.2004 informing about the incident of 01.09.2004.

6 . Statement of first party dated 1.09.2004 informing about the incident of 21.05.2004.

MEX-6

MEX - 7 7. Cash register folio 216 dated 31.08.2004

MEX -8 Cash register folio 217 dated 1.09.2004 8 .

MEX - 9 Transaction details for 21.05.2004 9 .

MEX -10 10. Statement of accounts for the period from 01.04.2004 to 01.09.2004 of OD account No. 1 of Shri Manjunatha Naik , Manager , Uttarahalli branch .

MEX - 11 11. Statement dated 2.09.2004 of S. Parameshwara (52330 ) , Clerk working at Account Section Bangalore addressed to the Investigation Officer .

12. Letter addressed to the investigation officer by Sudha S. , Clerk regarding shortage of cash of Rs . 10,000 /- .

MEX - 12

MEX- 13 13. Letter dated 1.09.2004 addressed to the manager by Shri Raghavendra S. Clerk regarding cash shortage of Rs . 10,000/-

List ofwitnesses examined by the first party/CSE before theEnquiryOfficer.

Nil

List ofDocuments of 1st party/CSE marked in the Enquiry

Nil

नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3405 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी/ एनजीपी/71/2006) 8707 [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार 21-10-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

statement , in response to which the workman , Shri Naval Kishore Thakur ( " the workman " in short) filed his statement of claim and the management of Bank of India (" the party no . 1 " in short) filed the written statement .

[सं० एल-12012/40/2006- आई०आर० (बी-2 ) ]

रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3405. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT/ NGP/ 71 /2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , NAGPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers. in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 27/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12012/40/2006- IR(B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI J.P. CHAND , PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM- LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR

Case No. CGIT /NGP/ 71 / 2006

Date: 14.10.2011

Party No. 1 : TheAsstt . General Manager , Bank of India, Kingsway, Nagpur Maharashtra

Versus

Party No. 2 : Shri Naval Kishore S /o . Sh . Jagdish Thakur , R/ o . Ambajhari Tekdi , Ajay Nagar , Hill Top , Nagpur ( MS )

AWARD

Dated, the 14th October , 2011

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub- section 2 ( A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) ( " the Act " in short ) , the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers , in relation to the management of Bank of India and their workman Shri Naval Kishore Thakur for adjudication , as per letter No. L - 12012/ 40/2006- IR ( B - II ) dated 07.08.2006 , with the following schedule: ---

"Whether the action of the management of the Bank of India in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service on Shri Naval Kishore J. Thakur from the post of driver - cum - sepoy is legal and justified? If not, to what extent the workman is entitled for relief? "

2. After receipt of the reference , the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written

The case of the workman as projected in the statement of claim is that on the basis of his application dated 18.03.1980 , to the General Manager , Bank of India, he was engaged as a driver on daily wages basis w.e.f. 21.03.1980 and after working continuously for a period of two years , on 01.02.1982 , he made an application to regularize his services and to pay salary at par with the regular drivers and accordingly, party no . 1 issued an order on 27.02.1982 , appointing him as a driver w.e.f. 01.03.1982 and according to the said order , he joined on 01.03.1982 on regular basis and he had no where claimed that he belongs to Schedule Tribe and the appointment order dated 27.02.1982 also does not disclose that his appointment was made , because he belongs to Schedule Tribe category and after a period of 15 years , the party no . 1 referred his cast claim to the caste scrutiny committee and the said committee, by its report dated 29.12.1997 , invalidated his caste claim and on the basis of such report , the party no. 1 issued the memorandum dated 09.01.1999 calling for his explanation and he challenged the order of the caste scrutiny committee before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay , Nagpur Bench , Nagpur and the Hon'ble High Court quashed the report of the caste scrutiny committee dated 29.12.1997 , so the caste scrutiny committee again conducted same proceedings and submitted its report to the party no . 1 on 11.11.2004 and the said committee mentioned in its report that he does not belong to Schedule Tribe community and on the basis of such report , party no . 1 issued a charge sheet dated 06.04.2005 , on the allegations that he had obtained services on the basis of invalid caste certificate and on 20.04.2005 , the enquiry officer held the departmental proceedings and recorded about his admitting the charges and he does not know English and his signatures were taken and on that basis , the enquiry officer submitted his report on 27.04.2005, concluding the charges are proved against him and the Chief Manager , Bank of India on 27.05.2005 passed the order of his dismissal from services and the appeal preferred by him was rejected on 26.07.2005 and the order ofdismissal is erroneous and cannot be sustained in the eye of law, as the same has been passed on wrong premises . It is further pleaded by the workman that at no point to time , he had claimed himself of belonging to Schedule Tribe and in his applications dated 18.03.1980 and 01.02.1982 also , he had not mentioned about his belonging to Schedule Tribe community and he was appointed as a regular employee and despite the same , charge sheet was submitted against him on false allegation of submitting false caste certificate ofSchedule Tribe , after a period of more than 22 years of service and such charge sheet was submitted , because , his caste certificate was declared invalid and lastly his services were terminated and the caste scrutiny committee 4182GI /11-22 8708

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii ) ] has nojurisdiction to decide the validity of caste certificate in respect of the employees of Government of India , under taking like the Bank and the caste scrutiny committee was formed by the Government of Maharashtra to verify the caste certificate issued by its authorities and the Government resolution issued by the Government of Maharashtra dated 15.06.1995 is applicable to his case and by such notification , all the persons , who were appointed as Schedule Tribe candidates are protected.

Itis further pleaded by the workman that the party no.1 conducted the domestic enquiry without examining witnesses , which shows manipulations and such enquiry is not sustainable in the eyes of law and the management took advantage of his lack of knowledge in English and recorded the guilt and as such , the order of dismissal dated 27.05.2005 is required to be quashed and set aside and he is entitled for reinstatement in service .

and cancelled and confiscated the said certificate and the workman challenged the order of the caste scrutiny committeedated 29.12.1997 , before the Hon'ble High Court, Nagpur Bench and the Hon'ble High Court remanded the matter to the caste scrutiny committee for fresh enquiry and the caste scrutiny committee by order dated 11.11.2004 passed in proceeding no . DD /TCSC / NGP VII/ 140/ 92-93 cancelled and confiscated the caste certificate of the workman and the order dated 11.11.2004 was not challenged by the workman before the competent court of law and as such , it can be held that the workman has accepted the order dated 11.11.2004 of the caste scrutiny committee and the services of the workman has been rightly terminated by the management and during the enquiry , the workman voluntarily and unconditionally accepted the charge leveled against him twice and the workman also signed the order sheet after understanding the same and till filing of the statement of claim , the workman had not claimed of his having no knowledge of English and it was also not claimed by the workman that his signatures were taken on the order sheet by force , coercion or by misrepresentation and in view of the admission of his guilt by the workman , the enquiry officer closed the enquiry and submitted his report on 27.04.2005 and the findings are based on the admission ofguilt of the workman and in view of the candid admission of guilt , the workman is estopped from challenging the validity and legality of the order passed by the enquiry officer and onthe basis of the report of the enquiry officer, on 17.05.2005 , the show cause notice regarding the proposed punishment was served on the workman and by the said notice , the workman was asked to remain present on 25.05.2005 before the Disciplinary Authority and the workman appeared before the Disciplinary Authority with his defence representative and submitted his explanation inwriting and in his said explanation also the workman did not mention that he has knowledge of English and the workman challenged the order of punishment by filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority on 13.06.2005 and in that appeal also , the workman did not mention anything about his not knowing English language and that his admission of guilt was under pressure or coercion or threat and after due consideration , the appellate authority dismissed the appeal on 26.07.2005 and the workman is not entitled for any relief.

4. As this is a case of dismissal from services of the workman, after holding a departmental enquiry , the validity of the enquiry was taken for consideration as a preliminary issue and by order dated 24.12.2009 , the departmental enquiry was held to be legal and in accordance with the principles of natural justice .

3. The party no. I in its written staternent has pleaded inter alia that the workman was neither appointed by it on 21.03.1980 nor worked continuously for a period two years , butby an order dated 27.02.1982 , the workman came to be appointed as driver- cum- sepoy and at the time of his appointment , the date of birth of the workman was mentioned as 01.07.1952 , so on the date of his appointment with the Bank , he was 30 years of age and appointment at such age is not permissible in case of open candidate and age relaxation was given to the workman , because he produced the Tribe claim and he was not appointed in open category and in his petition filed before the Hon'ble Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Nagpur, the. workman had claimed himself of his belonging to a community of Schedule Tribes and also admitted that the certificate dated 05.03.1981 issued by the Executive Magistrate , Nagpur was tendered by him along with other documents , which were part and parcel of the application form submitted by him , for getting the appointment and clause VIII of the order of appointment contained the conditions that the services of the workman would liable tobe terminated , if it would be revealed at any time after his appointment that the information and particulars furnished by him in the application and its enclosure to be false or materially incorrect or any particulars called by the Bank and the workman accepted the appointment on the terms and conditions mentioned in the order of appointment and thus from the date of joining , the workman was aware of the fact that his services would be terminated if the information given by him found to be false and the appointment order was in English and he had never raised any objection of his inability to understand English . It is also pleaded by the party no . 1 that the workman submitted the caste certificate dated 05.03.1981 and school leaving certificate dated 18.06.1968 with his application to the Bank and the caste scrutiny committee vide its report dated 29.12.1997 invalidated the caste certificate of the workman

5. At the time of the argument , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the workman that party no . 1 failed to take into consideration the resolution dated 15.06.1995 , by which all non - Tribes are protected in respect of their services and party no . 1 erroneously proceeded with the enquiry and dismissed the workman from services and on 8709 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

that ground alone , the order of dismissal is liable to be set aside and quashed and the workman was appointed as a regular employee in the Bank w.e.f. 01.03.1982 and after a period of 15 years , the caste certificate was referred to the caste scrutiny committee and the caste scrutiny committee invalidated the caste certificate , vide order dated 29.12.1997 and the said order was quashed by the Hon'ble High Court and the caste scrutiny committee again conducted the enquiry and vide order dated 11.11.2004 , the casted certificate of the workman was again invalidated and on that basis , charge sheet was issued on 6.4.2005 and after conducting enquiry , services of the workman were terminated , but the Hon'ble Apex Court have given protection to an employee of Nationalize Bank i.e. Punjab National Bank in the case of Punjab National Bank Vs. Vilas Govindrao Bokade and as such , the workman is also entitled for protection .

LocalAuthority or in any other Company or Corporation , owned or controlled by the Government or in any Government Aided Institution or Co - operative Society against a post reserved for such castes , tribes or classes byproducing a false caste certificate shall on cancellation ofthe caste certificate by the scrutiny committee , be liable to be debarred from the concerned educational institution or as the case may be , discharge from the said employment forthwith and any other benefits enjoyed or derived by virtue of such admission or appointment by such person as aforesaid shall be withdrawn forthwith and considering the mandate of the aforesaid provision , the punishment imposed is perfectlyjustified and legal . It was also submitted that in view of clause VIII of the appointment order, the workman was liable to be dismissed from service , as he submitted false information regarding his caste and so also about his educational qualification and therefore , the workman is not entitled for any relief.

In support of such contentions the learned advocate for the party no . 1 placed reliance on the decisions reported in 2008(2 ) Mh . L.J. 720 ( Supra) , 2007 (4 ) Mh.L.J. 1 (Additional General Manager vs. Suresh R. Burde ), 2007 (3 ) Mh: L.J. 795 ( State of Maharashtra vs. Sanjay K Nimje) , 2006 ( 1 ) Bombay C.R. 300 (SC) (Bank of India vs. Avinash ) and 2009 (2) Mh . L.J. 788 ( Ganesh Ranibhau Khalale vs. State of Maharashtra) .

6. Per contra, it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 that it has already been found that the departmental enquiry was valid and in accordance with the principles of natural justice and the workman voluntarily and unconditionally accepted the charges leveled against him, before the enquiry officer and considering the admission of the workman , the enquiry officer closed the proceedings and submitted his report on 27.04.2005 and in view of the acceptance of the charges by the workman , the question of perversity of findings doesn't arise and the workman has not challenged the order passed by the Schedule Tribe caste certificate scrutiny committee dated 11.11.2004 before the competent court of law and in view of the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court as reported in 2008 (2 ) Mh . L.J. - 720 ( Union of India Vs. Dattatraya and others ) , a judgment delivered by a Bench of three Hon'ble Judges , the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2007 (3 ) Mh . L.J. - 805 ( Supra ) cannot be made applicable to the present case and the judgment relied on by the workman is based on the resolution passed by the state of Maharashtra on 15.06.1995 , and the said judgment was delivered by a Bench comprising of two Hon'ble Judges and the resolution issued by the State of Maharashtra also cannot be made applicable to the present case , as the Bank in question is an undertaking of the Union of India and the appropriatę Government is the Union of India and the Maharasahtra Schdule Caste , Schedule Tribes , Denotified Tribes ( Vimukta Jaties ) , Normadic Tribes , other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category ( Regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate Act, 2000 came into force on 23rd May 2001 and sub - section 1 of section 10 of the aforesaid Act , provides that whoever not being a person belonging to any of the Scheduled Castes , Scheduled Tribes , Denotified Tribes ( Vimukta Jaties ) , Normadic Tribes , Other Backward Classes or Special Backward Category secures admission in any educational institution against a seat reserved for such castes , tribes or classes , or secures any appointment in the Government ,

7. From the materials on record and the submissions made by the learned advocates for the parties , it is clear that on consideration of the application submitted by the workman on 01.02.1982 , the party no . 1 appointed the workman as a driver on regular basis w.e.f. 01.03.1982 . According to the claim of the workman , he was working as a driver on daily wages basis from 21.03.1980 and on 01.02.1982, he submitted the application for regularization of his services and accordingly appointment letter dated 27.02.1982 was issued by the party no . I appointing him w.e.f. 01.03.1982 . Party no . 1 has denied the engagement of the workman on daily wages basis form 21.03.1980 . However, from the copy of the application submitted by the workman , the genuineness of which has not been disputed by the party no . 1 , it is clear that the workmanwas working with party no . 1 as a driver on daily wages basis w.e.f. 21.03.1980 . It is also not disputed by the parties that after a period of more than 15 years , the caste scrutiny committee vide order dated 29.12.1997 , invalidated the caste certificate of the workman and against the said order , the workman filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court and the Hon'ble High Court quashed the said report and the caste scrutiny committee formed by the Government of Maharashtra again conducted some proceedings and invalidated the caste certificate of the workman by order dated 11.11.2004 and basing on the said report , the party no . 1 submitted the charge sheet dated 06.02.2005 against the workman . It is also not disputed that the allegations in the charge sheet were that the workman was appointed in 8710

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 ( ⅱ )]

as reported in 2008 (2) Mh . L.J. 720 (Supra) and so also the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2007 (4) Mh . L.J. 1 (Supra).

In the decision reported in 2007 (3) Mh . L.J. 805 (Supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court have held that , "Maharashtra Scheduled Castes , Scheduled Tribes , De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis ), Narmadic Tribes , Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 (23 of2001 ) , S. 10, Constitution of India, Art. 342, Constitution ( S.T. ) Order 1950 , Part IX , Entry 19 and Government Resolutions dated 15.06.1995 and 30.06.2004- Appointment of respondent bank employee on 28.11.1989 on a reserved post for Scheduled Tribe Respondent claiming to be belonging to Halba Scheduled Tribe Termination of his services on invalidation of his caste certificate by Caste Scrutiny Committee-Government Resolution Since respondent was appointed on 28.11.1989 , he comes within the purview ofResolutiondated 15.06.1995 and his service is protected in terms of the said Resolution . "

However, in the judgment reported in 2008 (2) Mh. L.J. 720 ( Supra) , which is a judgroent ofa Bench consisting of three Hon'ble Judges , the Hon'ble Apex Court have held that, " Constitution of India , Art . 342 - Decision of the Constitution Bench in State of Maharashtra Vs. Milind , 2001 ( 1 ) Mh. L.J. (SC) 1 has no application to a case that relates to securing employment by wrongly claiming benefits of reservation meant for Schedule Tribes-In such case proper course is to cancel the employment obtained on the basis of false certificate so that the same can be filledup by candidate entitled to benfit of reservation .

Bank's service vide appointment order no. NRO: PERS.MMB.449, dated 27.02.1982 and while seeking such appointment, the workman claimed that he belonged to "Thakur" tribe which is recognized as Schedule Tribe and in suport of such claim, submitted caste certificate dated 05.03.1981 issued by the Executive Magistrate , Nagpur and he also submitted the school leaving certificate of Vidya Night High School dated 18.06.1968 , bearing admission register no . 5078 Sr. No. 367 and the caste certificate submitted by him was verified by the Schedule TribeCaste Scrutiny Committee , Nagpur, a duly constituted bodyofGovernment of Maharashtra and the said committee vide its order dated 11.11.2004 held the workman not belonging to "Schedule Tribe" and accordingly, his claim towards the same has been held invalid and the said committee also, on the basis of the report of its police vigilance cell , observed that the school leaving certificate issued by vidya night high school was false and hence , the workman was charged for committing misconduct in terms of para, 5 (j) and para 5 ( m) of the memorandum of settlement dated 10.04.2002. It is also not disputedby the parties that the departmental enquiry was held on 20.04.2005 and the workman appeared in the enquiry along withhis defence representative , Shri A.N. Sondule , a staff clerk and participated in the proceedings and the workman accepted the charges leveled against him voluntarily and unconditionally. It is also found that the workman was asked by the enquiry officer regarding admission of the charges by the workman wice , for the first time , when the workman was asked as to whether he is accepting the charges or not and again , when the workman was asked to adduce evidence in his defence . It is also clear from the documents thatthe workman , his defence representative , the management representative and the enquiry officer signed on the proceedings of the enquiry in token of the correctness of the same . The workman also made endorsement on the proceedings that the contents of the proceedings as maintained are correct and he has received the copy ofthe same . From the record, it is found that the workman voluntarily and unconditionally accepted the charges. So the contention raised by the workman that as he did not know English , taking advantage of the same, his signatures were taken on the proceedings of the enquiry is not correct and the same cannot be entertained.

8. The learned advocate for the workman submitted that the workman is entitled to get the protection , in view oftheresolution dated. 15.06.1995 and so also, the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment reported in 2007 (3) Mh . L..J . 805 (Supra) .

The respondent claiming to belong to "Halba- Schedule Tribe " secured employment on the said basis . One of the conditions of appointment was that if any declaration given or information furnished by him was proved to be false , he would be liable for removal from service. The Scrutiny Committee held that the respondent did not belong to " Halba - Schedule Tribe " . Accordingly the appellant issued show cause notice to the respondent seeking to terminate his services for falsely claiming to belong "Halba -Schedule Tribe " . The Bombay High Court upheld the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the respondent's tribe claim but directed that he would not be entitled to any benefits as a member of the Schedule Tribe from the date of its decision and that his services were not to be disturbed on the ground that he did not belong to Schedule Tribe . In special leave petition challenging the directions of the High Court to continue the respondent in service.

When a person secured employment by making a false claim regarding caste/ tribe , he deprives a legitimate candidate belonging to Schedule Caste/Tribe , of employment. In such a situation, the proper course is to Onthe other hand , it was submitted by the learned advocate for the party no . 1 that the resolution dated 15.06.1995 is not applicable to the Bank andthe workenan is also not protected by the principles enunciated by the Hon'bleApex Court in the decision mentioned above , in viewofthe large bench decision ofthe Hon'ble Apex Couit [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

cancel the employment obtained on the basis of false certificate so that the post may be filled by a candidate who is entitled to the benefit of reservation . Accordingly the judgement of the High Court directing the appellant to continue the respondent in service it was set aside . It was also made clear that he was not to be entitled for any pensionary benefits . "

In the judgement reported in 2007 (4) Mh . L.J. 1 (Supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court have held that , " Learned Counsel for the respondent also sought to take some benefit ofa certain Government order dated 15.6.1995 issued by the State of Maharashtra wherein some reservation is in service is provided to members of Special Backward Class. In our opinion the respondent can get no benefit from the same as he is not an employee of Government of Maharashtra but is an employee of a public sector undertaking of Central Government and he secured the appointment long before on 31.5.1982 .

So for applicability ofjudicial precedent is concerned, it is settled beyond doubt that the judgement of a larger bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court have preference over the judgement of smaller bench and in case of judgements of co -ordinate benches , the later judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court have the preference over the earlier judgement. Inthis case , as the judgement reported in 2008 (2 ) Mh. L.J. 720 (Supra ) is a judgement of a bench consisting of three Hon'ble Judges and the judgement reported in 2007 ( 3 ) Mh. L.J. 805 ( Supra ) is a judgement of a bench consisting of two Hon'ble Judges , the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgement reported in 2008 (2) Mh. L.J. 720 ( Supra ) are applicable to this case . Likewise , the judgements reported in 2007 (3 ) Mh . L.J. 805 (Supra) and the judgement reported in 2007 (4) Mh . L.J. - 1 ( Supra) are judgement of coordinate benches of the Hon'ble Apex Court, but the judgement reported in 2007 (4) Mh . L.J. - 1 (Supra) is a later judgement ( Civil Appeal no . 2424/2007 decided on 10.5.2007 ) than the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2007 (3 ) Mh . L.J. 805 ( Supra ) (Civil Appeal no . 1547 and 1548/2007 decided on 22.3.2007 ) . Hence, the principles enunciated in the decision reported in 2007 (4 ) Mh. L.J. 1 (Supra) are applicable to this case .

So, applying the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Courts as reported in 2008 ( 2 ) Mh. L.J. 720 (Supra) and 2007 ( 4 ) Mh. L.J. 1 ( Supra) to the present case at hand, it is found that the workman is not entitled to the protection of the resolution dated 15.06.1995 of the Government of Maharashtra or as per the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the decision reported in 2007 (3 ) Mh . L.J. - 805 (Supra) .

9. Moreover, this is not only a case of securing the employment basing on false caste certificate of Schedule Tribe , but also , a case of submission of false school leaving certificate . As already mentioned earlier , the workman had admitted the charges of submitting false caste certificate

8711

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

of Schedule Tribe even though he does not belong to Schedule Tribe and also submission of false school leaving certificate , during the departmental enquiry , voluntarily and unconditionally. Condition no. VIII of the appointment letter of the workman is that " if any information given and the particulars furnished by him in the application and its enclosures were proved to be incorrect of false , then his services would be liable to be terminated . " It is clear for the evidence on record that the workman furnished false information in his application regarding his caste certificate and school leaving certificate . The order of the caste scrutiny committed dated 11.11.2004 has not been challenged by the workman . So , in view of violation of condition no . VIII of the appointment order , the services of the workman is also liable to be terminated .

As the findings of the enquiry officer are based on the voluntary and unconditional admission of the charges by the workman , the same cannot be said to be perverse . The punishment imposed against the workman also cannot be said to be surprisingly disproportionate to the serious misconducts proved against him in a properly conducted departmental enquiry. Considering the case of the workman from any angle as mentioned above , it is found that the punishment imposed against the workman is justified . Hence , it is ordered:-

ORDER

The action of the management of the Bank of India in imposing the punishment of dismissal form service of Shri Naval Kishore J. Thakur from the post of driver - cum- sepoy is legal and justified . The workman is not entitled to any relief.

J.P. CHAND,

PresidingOfficer.

नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर , 2011

का०अ० 3406 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ महाराष्ट्र के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , बंगलौर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 48/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार 17-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-12011 / 120/ 2005 - आई आर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह,

डेस्क अधिकारी । New Delhi , the 31st October , 2011

S.O. 3406. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 48/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , BANGALORE now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bunk of Maharashtra and their workman , 8712

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II SEC . 3( ii) ] which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011/120/2005 - IR (B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , DeskOfficer.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT, BANGALORE-560 022 .

Dated: 05.10.2011

PRESENT

Shri S.N. NAVALGUND Presiding Officer

C.R. No. 48/2005

! PARTY

II PARTY

The Regional Manager , Bank of Maharashtra , 15 , Police Station Road , Basavangudi , BANGALORE- 560064

The Secretary, Bank of Maharashtra Employees Union , No. 102 Near Tele Solution House , Gandhi Bazar , BANGALORE -- 4

ORDER

and it has been confirmed by him that he had not allotted the vehicle on rental basis during the said period and thus he has misutilised the LFC facility and committed gross misconduct as stipulated by clause 19.5 (j ) of the Bipartite Settlement and since both the initial bill and the final receipt issued by the travel agency being produced by him and there appears to be mistake in the vehicle number in the firstbill issued by the that agency with an ulterior motive taking advantage of the same after five years he came tobe served with charge sheet and by that time the travel agency was being closed he could not produce any evidence to explain the variance of vehicle used for the travel as such this delay of 5 years in issuing the charge sheet amounts to condonation of alleged misconduct and it is against the principles of natural justice and that the charge-sheet was very vague and only annexures 1 to 7 were supplied to him with the charge sheet but as many as 25 documents came to be got marked in the enquiry and that the charge sheet ought to have been issued by the Cheif Managar but the same being issued by the Deputy General Manager the same has no sanctity being issued by an incompetent official and that he was not even given fair and proper opportunity to cross examine the management witnesses in the enquiry with other contention regarding the perversity of the enquiry findings , my learned Predecessor formulated the following issue to hear as Preliminary Issue--

"Whether the Domestic Enquiry conducted against the first party by the Second Party is fair and proper?"

1. In this reference (No. L - 12011 / 120/ 2005 - IR ( B - II dated 11.11.2005 ) by the Central Government for adjudication as to " Whether the action of the management of Bank of Maharashtra in awarding the punishment of reduction in scale of pay by two stages with cumulative effect on Shri Munikrishnappa , General Clerk, Bank of Maharashtra , Gandhi Nagar Branch , Bangalore is fair and justified? If not , to what reliefhe is entitled to? " , in view of the assertion made in the Claim Statement filed by the Joint Secretary, BMEU , Mumbai on behalf of the first party workman that in relation to his availment of Leave Concession facility from 11.04.1998 to 26.04.1998 , to his surprise on 23.09.2003 charge sheet came to be issued by the Dy. General Manager, Bangalore Regional Office alleging that he who availed Leave Fare Concession ( LFC) from 11.04.1998 to 26.04.1998 while working at Malleswaram branch of the bank availed advance of Rs . 15,000/- and submitted LFC bill dated 05.05.1998 through F - 150 for Rs . 25,000/- along with the official receipt cum certificate of journey dated07.04.1998 issued by Sri Durga Travels stating that he has traveled by Bus No KA- 02 - N- 8585 to various places and further on 04-06-1998 he requested for additional advance of Rs . 2000/- reporting the travel agency being recognized by KSTDC produced one more receipt stating tobe the official receipt cum certificate ofjourney from the same travel agency stating Bus No. AP-03 /T- 0783 being used for the travel and from investigation it revealed the vehicle registered at KA- 02 - N - 8585 being a Maruthi Van owned by Sri Srinivasamurthy of Vijayanagar , Bangalore

2. To substantiate this issue on behalf of the management in the first instance while filling the affidavit ofShri S. Sampath , enquiry officer in the DE examining him on oath as MW 1 on 27.07.2010 proceedings of the enquiry maintainedby him , the documents marked during the course ofenquiry behalf of the management and workman were got marked as Ex . M1 to M3 series respectively and at the instance of the counsel for the first party his cross examination was deferred and subsequently second party counsel submitting that he is not willing to come and offer himself for cross examination , filed and application under Section 11 of the ID Act on 06.09.2010 seeking permission to lead second party evidence through Shri Gopala Krishna Bhat, Manager, Regional Office , Bangalore in the place of the enquiry officer and then filed an affidavit of said Shri Gopala Krishna Bhat and examined him on oath as MW1 on 29.11.2010 and through him got marked enquiry proceedings ( register ) , copy of notice issued to CSE/first partydated 04.05.2004 for personal hearing ; proceedings ofthe. DA dated 14.05.2004 ; Enquiry finding with covering letter dated 08.03.2004 , documents produced in the enquiry ; administrative order and order of Disciplinary Authority dated 23.06.2004 and Order of the Appellate authority dated 23.06.2004 as Ex . M1 to M7 and he was subjected to cross 8713 भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

[ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

examination by the learned advocate appearing for the first party. Inter alia the first party filed his affidavit in lieu of his evidence on 18.01.2011 and examined himself on oath as WW1 and subjected for cross exmination for the counsel by the second party.

3. With the above pleadings touching the domestic enquiry, oral and documentary evidence brought on record by both the sides the arguments addressed by the learned advocates appearing for both sides were heard.

In view of the facts narrated by me above , in the light ofthe arguments addressed before me , the points that arises for my consideration in disposal of this preliminary issue are--

( 1 ) Whether the issuance of charge sheet after about 5 years of the impugned transaction to avail the LFC by the first party violated the principles of natural justice and thereby the initiation of Domestic Enquiry itself is violative and liable to be set aside ?

(2) Whether the DE was initiated by a competent authority i.e. the Disciplinary Authority to the first party?

( 3 ) Whether fair and proper opportunity was given to the first party in the Domestic Enquiry ?

(4) What Order ?

4. On appreciation of the pleadings of both the sides touching this preliminary issue , oral and documentary evidence brought on record for both the sides in the light of the arguments addressed by their learned advocates my finding on Point No. 1 is in the affirmative , 2 and 3 in the negative and 4 is as per final order for the following reasons:

REASONS

investigation whether there xisted travel agency under the name of Sri Durga Travels recognized by KSTDC and they have issued such final receipts cum certificate ofjourney mentioning two different vehicle numbers and if so what is the reasons for such variance and simply having regard to the variation in the number of the vehicle used in the two receipts and one of the number found to be a Maruti Van owned by a private person jumped to a conclusion that the first party submitted false receipt and thereby committed misconduct and issued the impugned charge sheet after more than 5 years of the transaction . This variance in the number on the receipt produced by the first party were since noticeable when he submitted them to the second party ifbefore passing the bill the second party were to ask for clarification from the first party he would have been able to produce the evidence of the travel agency to explain the variance in two receipts produced by him in relation to the vehicle going to be used for the travel . The first party has categorically contended that the travel agency through which he had made travel was since closed in the year 2000 itself, when the charge sheet was issued to him in this regard on 23.09.2003 after a lapse on 5 years and two years of the closure of the travel agency, he could not produce the evidence of the travel agency to explain the variation appearing in the receipts regarding the vehicle number to be used for travel and thereby issue of charge sheet after 5 years of the transaction violated the principles of natural justice , no explanation is given either in the counter statement or in the evidence led through MW1 to explain this long delay in issuing of charge sheet to the first party. In the citation relied upon by the counsel for the first party onthis count reported in 1992-1LLJ 226 it is laid down that delay in initiating the enquiry without explanation enable the charge sheeted employee to assume that the enquiry was abandoned or was not going to be held and it suffers from breach of natural justice and is aptly applicable to the facts of the case on hand . The learned advocate appearing for the second party rest contended by submitting that there is no prejudice caused to the first party due to delay in initiating the DE after a lapse of 5 years , but as explained by me above , such a long delay in initiating the DE by serving charge sheet dated 23-09.2003 prejudiced the defence ofthe first party since he could not make available the evidence of the travel agency through which he had traveled which was closed by the time he was served with the charge sheet . This fact being pleaded and proved by leading evidence of the first party there is all the force in the contention of the first party that due to delay of 5 years in issuing this charge sheet it violated the principles of natural justice and thereby it deserves to be set aside . Hence my finding on this.point is in the Affirmative .

6. Point No. 2 : Though the first party categorically and specifically asserted in para 6 of the claim statement the charge sheet ought to have been issued by the Chief 5. Point No. 1 : It is an admitted fact the first party workman availed Leave fare concession from 11.04.1998 to 26.04.1998 while working at Malleswaram Branch of the Second Party bank and availed advance amount of Rs. 15,000/ - and submitted LFC bill dated 05.05.1998 through F - 150 for Rs . 25,000/ - along with the official receipt cum Certificate ofjourney dated 07.04.1998 issued by Sri Durga Travels wherein vehicle number is mentioned as No. ΚΑ- 02- N - 8585 and thereafter on 04.06.1998 he requested for additional advance of Rs . 2000/- and produced one more receipt stating to be the official receipt cum certificate of the journey issued by Sri Durga Travels dated 07.04.1998 , wherein vehicle number is mentioned as No. AP - 03 /T- 0783 being used for travel . In view of this difference in the vehicle used for the travel it is claimed the second party made enquiries and came to know that vehicle registered at No. KA - 02 - N - 8585 being Maruti Van owned by Sri Srinivasamurthy of Vijayanagar , Bangalore who confirmed that he had not allotted the vehicle on rental basis and thus the first party committed misconduct by producing false bills . The Second party did not make any 8714

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

Manager and the charge sheet issued by the Dy. General Managar, Regional Office is one without jurisdiction and thereby claim that it is the Chief Manager who is the DisciplinaryAuthority to him , no whisper is made either in the counter statement filed for the second party as to who wouldbe the Disciplinary Authority or competent authority to issue the charge sheet against the first party or even no evidence is brought on record through MW1 the sole witness examined for the second party, thereby I am ofthe view tht the second party failed to substantiate the Dy. General Manager who issued the charge sheet was competent to issue the same and thereby answer this point inthe nagative .

7. Point No. 3 : Infact in view of my finding on point Nos . 1&2 I feel that there is no need to go into the aspect whether fair and proper opportunity was given to the first party in the enquiry. However, both parties having led evidence on this aspect as well let me consider this aspect ofthe case as well . It has been unequivocally admitted by MW1 , Shri Gopalakrishana Bhat in this cross examination that along with the charge sheet was not accompanied with list of witnesses and statement of witnesses recorded by the Investigating Officer , qualifying that since only Investigation Officer was intended to be examined list of witnesses was not forwarded along with the charge sheet and that during the enquiry Investigation Officer alone has been examined . But the enquiry proceedings which is produced at Ex.M1 discloses that investigating officer was not examined in the enquiry and the documents exhibited were got marked by examining one Shri A.S. Naik , Manager, Regional Office , Bangalore , Though the Defence Representative objected for marking the investigation report without the examination of the investigating officer the investigation report was marked and he was not tendered to testify by way of cross examination by the DR. Therefore , justproduction of an investigation report without testifying the Investigation Officer or the witnesses on the basis of whose statement he prepared the investigation report no value can be attached to such investigation report . In other words in the absence of examination of the Investigating Officer or the witnesses on whose evidence the investigation report was prepared giving an opportunity to the CSE to testify their version by way of cross examination there is a clear denial of fair opportunity to the firstparty in the DE .

8. In view ofmy finding on point No. 1 to 3 , not only the enquiry finding is liable to be set aside but also the very initiation of the DE by issuing the delayed charge sheet is liable to be set aside and consequently the punishment imposed is set aside with direction to restore his salary. In the result I pass the following Order:

ORDER

The Preliminary Issue is answered in the nagative

[ PART II-SEC. 3 (ii ) ] and very initiation of the DE on the count of unexplained long delay is set aside and consequently the second party is directed to restore the salary of the first party and pay the arrears . Send a copy of the order to the Ministry for Gazzette Notification as if it is an award .

(Dictated to PA transcribed by her corrected and signedby me on 05.10.2011)

S.N. NAVALGUND, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर, 2011

का० आ० 3407 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इलाहाबाद बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण श्रम न्यायालय, लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 03/2010 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार 17-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल०-12011 / 102/2009 - आईआर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3407. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 03/20101) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , LUCKNOW now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Allahabad Bank and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011 / 102/2009 - IR(B -II ) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL- CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW

PRESENT Dr. MANJU NIGAM PRESIDING OFFICER I.D. NO . 03/2010

Ref. No. L - 12011 / 102/2009 - IR ( B -II ) dated: 08.01.2010 BETWEEEN

Secretary Allahabad Bank Stafff Association Shahazahanpur Unit C/ o Allahabad Bank , City Office Shahjahanpur ( U.P. ) (Espousing cause of Shri Kamal Kumar)

AND [ भाग II- खण्ड 3( ii) ]

TheAssistant General Manager

Allahabad Bank

Zonal Office Lal Bagh

Lucknow

AWARD

1. By order No. L - 12011 / 102/ 2009 - IR(BR- II) dated: 08.01.2010 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clauses (d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) referred this industrial disputes between the Secretary, Allahabad Bank Staff Association , Shahjahanpur Unit C/o Allahabad Bank , City Office , Shahjahanpur ( U.P. ) (Espousing cause of Shri Kamal Kumar) and the Assistant General Manager , Allahabad Bank, Zonal Office Lal Bagh, Lucknow for adjudication.

2.the reference under adjudication is:

"Whether the action of the management of the management of Allahabad Bank in imposing the penalty of'briging down to lower stage in the scale ofpay by 2 stages ' on Shri Kamal Kumar, peon- cum-daftary, civil line branch, Shahjahanpur vide order dated 09.09.2008 and there by confirming the same vide appelate authority order dated 20.04.2009 is legal and justified. what relief the workman concerned is entitled to. "

3. It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, Kamal Kumar was served a charge sheet dated 18.09.2007 , which was replied by the workman . Shri V.K. Chaturvedi was appointed as Inquiry Officer to enquire into the charges . The Inquiry Officer submitted his report on 17.- 06.2008 and the Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment order vide dated 08.09.2007 , awarding punishment of 'bringing down to lower stage in the scale of pay by two stages. ' Aggrieved from punishment order , the workman preferrred an appeal , before Appellate Authority, which wasdismissed vide order dated 20.04.2009 .

4. The workman's union has alleged in its statement ofclaim that the domestic enquiry was conducted in utter violation ofpricinciples ofnatural justice as the workman was not afforded proper opportunity to defend himself. It has specifically been stated that the Disciplinary Authority agreeing with the findings of the Inquiry Officer, issued show cause to the workman , seeking his representative without giving furnishing him a copy of the inquiry report . It has also submittted that the Disciplinary Authority passed impugned order dated 09.09.2008 without application of mind and without considering the case of the workman. Likewise , the appellate authority rejected the appeal 4182GI/11-23

8715

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/ अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

without considering the pleading of the workman by a unreasoned order. Accordingly, the workman's unionhas prayed that the impugned order 09.09.2008 of the Disciplinary Authority and order dated 20.04.2009 ofthe AppellateAuthority be set aside with consequential benefit to the workman.

5. The management of the Allahabad Bank, in its written statement , has denied the allegations of the workman's union and has submitted that the domestic inquiry held by it was fair and proper and was in accordance with the norms and the principles of natural justice were properly observed during the course of domestic enquiry and the workman was afforded all opportunities todefend himself, accordingly, there is no flaw in the inquiry. Thus the management of the Bank has prayed that the reference is liable to be anwered in negative and in against the workmen's union .

6.The workman's union has filed rejoinder whereby ithas only reiterated his avements in the statement ofclaims and has not introduced any fact.

7. The workman's union has filed list of documents dated NIL paper No. W- 5 , in support of his case whereas the management has not filed any.

8. After filling of rejoinder on 12.10.2010, the workman's union was called upon to file its evidence on 22.11.2010; but it did not filed any next date 27.12.2010 was fixed for same . The workman's union remained absent on 27.12.2010, 01.02.2011 , 11.03.2011 , 03.05.2011 , 15.06.2011 , 18.08.2011 and 11.10.2011 ; even through it was issued notice dated 04.05.2011 to appear before this Tribunal on 15.06.2011 and take part in proceedings ; but the workman's union has not turned up . Another dated 10.08.2011 and thereafter 11.10.2011 was fixed but , the workman's union failed to appear, as such, the case reserved for award, keeping in view the long pendency of the case .

6. Perused the entire evidence on record.

7. The workman has filed list of document dated NIL in support of his claim ; wherein he has filed photocopy of charge sheet , proceedings of domestic inquiry, correspondence during inquiry, inquiry report , show cause , penalty order and appellate order etc. The management has not filed any document in rebuttal.

8. The case of the workman's union that the workman was served upon an illegal charge sheet and the domestic inquiry conducted by the management was in violation of the principles of the natural justice and also , that the impunged order of penalty and that of appellate order are illegal.

9. Per contra, the management of the Bank has disputed the claim of the workman's union and has submitted that the domestic inquiry, held by it . was in accordance to the principles of natural justice and fair play, 8716

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

NewDelhi, the 31st October, 2011 and, as such , there is no flaw in the enquiry and the same is fairandproper.

S.O. 3408. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 78/1998) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court - II , KANPUR now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Bank of India and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/ 2011.

[No. L- 12012/ 74/ 1998 - IR (B- II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

10. It is well setteled that if a party challenges ther legality oforder , the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party, invoking jurisdiction of the court , must fail . In the present case burden was on the workman's union to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the punishment order dated09.09.2008 and that appellate order 20.04.2009 and to prove the impunged . It was the case ofthe domestic inquiry was not conducted as per principles of natural justice and that he was not afforded proper opportunities to defend himself. This claim has been denied by the management ; therefore , it was for the workman's union to lead evidence to show that the domestic inquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice and the impugned orders dated 09.09.2008 and 20.04.2009 were illegal.

Before Sri Ram Parkash , Hjs , Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Kanpur. Industrial Dispute No. 78 of98 BETWEEN

Secretary, Central Bank StaffAssociation , 87/3/4A , Sarvodaya Nagar, Allahpur,Allahabad.

And

TheRegional Manager, Central Bank of India , RO Lanka, Varanasi

11. In the present case the workman's union has not turned to substantiate its case by way of filing any oral evidence. Merely pleadings are no substitute for proof. It was obligatory on the part of workman's union to come forward with the case that the domestic inquiry was conducted against the principles of natural justice and the impugned orders dated 09.09.2008 and 20.04.2009 were illegal ; but it failed to forward any evidence in support of its claim as it did not turn up after filing its statement of claim and rejoinder before this Tribunal ; even after notice being issued to him . There is no reliable material for recording findings that the alleged injustice was done to the workman concerned or the alleged unjust or illegal impugned orders dated 09.09.2008 and 20.04.2009 were passed by the management .

AWARD

12.Accordingly, the reference is adjudicated against theworkman's union ; and as such, I come to the conclusion thatthe concerned workman , Kamal Kumar is not entitled to any ofthe relief( s) claimed by him .

1. Central Govvernment , Mol , New Delhi vide notification No.L - 12012/ 74/ 98 / IR(B - II ) dated 29.04.98 , has referred the following dispute to this tribunal for adjudication-

13. Award as above .

LUCKNOW 12.10.2011

Dr. MANJU NIGAM, Presiding Officer

नई दिल्ली 31 अक्तूबर 2011

2. Whether the action of Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Sri Jamuna Prasad and not absorbing him in subordinate cadre although he claimed to have put in more then 240 days of service during 01.01.91 to 31-12.91 , is legal and justified? if no to what relief the said workman is entitled?

का०आ० 3408 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सेन्ट्रल बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 78/1998 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल-12012/74/1998- आई आर ( बी 2 ) ]

रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी

3. Case of the workman in short is that he was offered the post of temporary peon by the opposite party bank on 10.03.89 at SC College Extension Counter Ballia. The workmancontinued till the year 1989 , 1990 , 1991 and 1992. It is also started by the claimant that during the period 01.01.91 to 31.12.91 the clamant worked in the above said branch of the bank and have thus rendered service for 266 days. It is further alleged that the claim of the claimant was required for providing him regular and permanent eniployment by the opposite party bank in terms of letter No. F -3/3 /104/87- IR dated 18.08.90 issued by the Mol , New [भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Delhi . The claimant was fully covered by the said letter of the Gol. The bank not only ignored to consider his case terminated his service with effect from 16.06.92 without providing any notice , notice pay or retrenchment compensationwhich act of the management is in violation ofthe provisions of Sec . 25.F of the Act . Accordingly it is prayed that the claim of the workman be allowed and he be reinstated in the service of the bank with full back wages and continuity of service .

4.The opposite party filed their reply in which the claim of the claimant has been seriously refuted inter alia onthe ground that the claimant was engatged as casual on daily ratedbasis by SC College extension Counter District Ballia for which charges has been paid to him on the basis ofworkdone in a day. The claimant never held any regular and permanent post in the bank in any cadre whatsoever. Claimant was not issued any appointment letter or termination letter . He was not appointed on any regular post. He was not appointed by following any prescribed procedure which is mandatory to be followed by the competent authority. Branch Manager was not the competent authority. It is stated that he was engaged as a daily rated worker for the purpose to fetch water and this relates only working of two hours in a day. On the basis of above is it prayed that the claim of the workman is misleading and without any merit as such it should be rejected.

5.Rejoinder has also been filed by the workmanbut nothing new has been contended therein except reiterating the facts already pleaded in the claim statement.

6. Both the parties have filed the documentary as well as oral evidence .

7. I have considered each and every aspect of the oral as well as documentary evidence . Arguments have beenheard at length .

8. The A.R. for the Opposite party has drawn my attention towards the reference order which has not mentioned any date of termination of the workman. He contended that the reference is vague .

9. To this I have also put a specific question to the auth representative for the workman Sri B P Saxena, who replied that he is not pressing the issue of termination of the workman but he is pressing for the absorption of the worker.

10. For me to some extent it appears to be very absurd position. I have given a thought . If I forgo the issue fo termination , is it possible to look into the point of absorption when it is an admitted case that the workman is a daily rated casual labour.

11. First of all the authorized representative for the workman has placed much reliance upon a circular which is filed by him along with list of documents . It is dated 16.08.90.

8717

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011/ अग्रहायण 5, 1933

He is stressing upon these contentions mentioned in para4(a) .

12. It is reproduced as under-

13. The cases of temporary employees who have put in not less than 240 days of temporary service in twelve consecutive months and who are entitled to the benefit of section 25F of the I.D. Act may be decided by entering into a settlement with the representative union .

14. Whereas the authorized representative for the opposite party has refuted the contention and raised an argument against the circular also saying , that there is another circular dated 12.03.91 of Central Bank of India , It is argued that the content of the circular overrides the circular filed by the workman which is of the year 1990 . This circular specifically states in Para 3.1 that temporary employees who have put in 240 days of temporary service in any continuous period of 12 months after 01.01.82 up to 31.12.90 will be considered for absorption in immediate available vacancies without any test and interview.

15. Therefore , I have also gone through the contents ofthis circular and I find that there is cutoff date 31.12.90 whereas in the reference order the period which is looked into is 01.01.91 to 31.12.91 , therefore , according to this circular the workman is not entitled to any relief. The voucher which have been summoned and filed by the oppositeparty are from the period 22.06.91 to 15.06.92 filed along with list dated 16.05.01 . These are exhibits M - 1 to M- 73 . These have been admitted by the workman in his statement.

16.Opposite party witness Sri SN Singh has deposed on oath on 05.01.05 that the claimant was not issued any appointment letter or termination letter . He was not appointed on any regular post . He was not appointed by following any prescribed procedure which is mandatory to be followed by the competent authority. Branch Manager. was not the competent authority. It is stated that he was engaged as a daily rated worker for the purpose to fetch water and this relates only working of two hours in a day.

17.Again I have pondered over whether in the given facts and circumstance of the case the issue of termination which does not mention any date can be ignored. I do not find any cogent reason to ignore this point . Unless I find that the workman has been terminated on a particular date which should be mentioned in the reference order , I am of the view that I cannot travel further to give direction to the opposite party to reinstate the worker and absorb him .

18.I have gone through the pleadings of the workman. In para 14 the workman has prescribed the date oftermination as 16.06.92 , which is not mentioned in the reference order. In the reference order it shows the period to be considered is 01.01.91 to 31.12.91 . Both the things appear to be contradictory.

8718

[PART II-SEC.3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

19. Opposite party has placed reliance upon a decision 2005 ( 104 ) FLR 893 Allahahabd High Court between Union Bank of India & PO CGIT Kanpur and others .

20. The Hon'ble High Court held and found that reference under section 10- Whether the claim that he is entitled to be reinstated in service is justified-held- is vague and not precise reference .

21.1 therefore find that in the present reference the reference is not precise as the terms of reference are not clearly spelt out .

22. The claimant has also placed reliance upon a document which is an inspection report and copy of attendance register which is annexure 3 filed along with the application and inspection report dated 18.05.11 . The opposite party has contended that the attendance register , a photocopy of which has been filed does not relate to the present workman Jamuna Prasad because the name of Sri Pyrey Lal is printed upon the attendance register. It has been contended that there was no attendance marked with regard to the casual workers . Claimant has also accepted in his cross that he was engaged as daily rated worker and he used to fetch water. He also admitted that he was never marked his presence in the bank . Therefore , the contention of the auth . Representative for the claimant that the attendance register shows his continuity in service does not carry any weight .

23.Opposite party has also placed reliance upon a decision 2010 ( 125 ) FLR 517 SC Satya Parkas & others versus State of Bihar . In this case daily wagers appellants had sought regularization in service - they were never appointed on any sanctioned post . Held- merely because a temporary employee or a casual worker is continued for a time beyond the term of his appointment , he would not be entitled to be absorbed in regular service or made permanent , merely on the strength of such continuance , if the original appointment was not made by following a due process of selection as envisaged by the relevant rules . Therefore , the Hon'ble court held that the petitioner were not entitled for the regularization .

24. In the present case also the workman has not given any application for appointment his name was never called from employment exchange , he was never subjected to interview or test ; therefore , in such circumstances he cannot claim that he should be absorbed on regular post .

25. Therefore considering all the facts and circumstances of the case I am of the view that the reference is vague on the point of termination . I ain also of the view that the claimant has failed to prove that he is entitled for regularization on the basis of circular mentioned aforesaid . Therefore , the claimant has failed to prove his case and as such he held not entitled for any relief.

26. Reference is therefore , answered against the claimant and in favor of the opposite party.

RAM PARKASH , Presiding Officer .

नई दिल्ली , 31 अक्तूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3409 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑफ बड़ौदा के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटीए/ 1250/ 2004) (आईटीसी सं० 11/2004 पुराना ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था। [सं० एल 12011/8/2004- आई आर (बी -2)] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3409. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 the Central Government hereby publishes the Award [Ref. No. CGITA/1250/2004 (ITC No. 11/2004 Old) ] of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/ Labour Court , AHMEDABAD now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L - 12011 / 8/2004- IR(B- II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, AHMEDABAD

Present ....

Binay Kumar Sinha , Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court Ahmedabad , Dated 26.09.2011

Reference : CGITA of 1250 of 2004 New Reference : ITC . 11/2004 ( Old)

Regional Manager ,

Bank ofBaroda

...... First Party 2nd Floor , M.G Road, Nr. GPO . Rajkot-360002. And their workman Smt . Manjulaben P. Bagtharia , Through The President , Saurashtra Employees Union , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

Umesh Commercial Complex,

213 and 214 , 2nd Floor,

Nr . Chaudhar High School ,

Rajkot-360001

..... Second Party Forthe first party : Shri K.V. Gadhia , Advocate Shri M.K. Patel , Advocate For the second party : None

AWARD

TheAppropriate Government, Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Shram Mantralaya , New Delhi by its order No. L- 12011 / 8 /2004 IR (B - II ) dated 29.04.2004 referred the dispute for adjudication by this tribunal which was existing between the employer in relation to the management of Bank of Baroda and their workman as per terms of reference in the schedule as follows :-

THE SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Bank of Baroda in not regularising the services of Smt. Manjulaben P. Bagtharia is justified ? If not , what relief the workman is entitled to ? "

8719

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

This reference is thus rejected for non - prosecution by the second party.

Dictated BINAY KUMAR SINHA , Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 31 अक्तूबर , 2011

का०आ० 3410 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार देना बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/ श्रम न्यायालय , कोलकाता के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 01/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[संॐ एल 12011/139/2004- आई आर (जी-2) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011

S.O. 3410. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 01/2005 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal / Labour Court , KOLKATA now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Dena Bank and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No. L- 12011 / 139/2004- IR ( B - II) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 01 of 2005

Parties : Employers in relation to the management ofDena Bank AND Their workmen .

Present: Mr. Justice Manik Mohan Sarkar Presiding Officer

APPEARANCE :

Mr. Bikash Saha ,

On behalf of the

Management

2. On receiving the reference , case was registered and the notice to the parties were issued from the court of Industrial Court ( Central ) Ahmedabad where the case was pending . The notices were issued on several occasions , but the second party workman either herself or through the union did not appear . Likewise the first party did not appear when the case was pending in the previous Industrial Courts . Subsequently the record received on transfer in this Tribunal as per order of the M.O.L. , New Delhi dated 19.10.2010 . Again fresh notice were issued to the parties and this time the first party appeared by executing Vakalatnama in favour of Shri K.V. Gadhia and Shri M.Κ. Patel at Ext. 3. But neither the second party workman herself nor the Saurashtra Employees Union appeared in this case. So , this Tribunal has reason to believe that the second partywho raised the dispute for her regularising in services of the Bank has become disinterested in this case . The second party did not file statement of claim for presenting her case . On the other hand the Management of first party appeared through Lawyer and is waiting for statement of claim , if any , of the second party. So , that written statement may be filed . Since the workman has lost interest and also failed to prove that action of the first party is unjustified and illegal so the following order is passed.

ORDER

The action of the management of Bank of Baroda in not regularising the service of Smt . Manjulaben P. Bagtharia is justified . The workman is not entitled to get any relief.

Manager of Dena Bank, Regional Office , Kolkata .

On behalf of the Mr. Salil Chakraborty, Workmen

Vice President of Dena Bank Employees' Union (W.B. )

State : West Bengal . Industry : Banking . Dated: 30th September , 2011 .

8720

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ) THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

AWARD

By Order No. L - 12011 / 139/ 2004- IR ( B - II ) dated 23.11.2004 theGovernment of India, Ministry ofLabour in exercise of its powers under Section 10( 1 )( d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Dena Bank, Regional Office, East India Operation, 2-1, Shakespeare Sarani, Mangal Kalash , 5th Floor, Kolkata - 700071 in dismissing the services of Shri Dhanapati Halder, Cashier- cum- Clerk of Shyam Bazar Branch is legal and justified ? Ifnot, what reliefthe workman concerned is entitled to? " 2.Afterdisposal of the matter relating to validity of domestic enquiry as being valid , the matter is pending for deciding on the adequacy or propportionity of the punishment inflicted upon the workman concerned by the management Dena Bank's disciplinary authority on the charges of misconduct .

3.For recapitulation , the story of the workman as per written statement of claim is being shortly referred . The workman , Shri Dhanapati Halder was recruited as a subordinate staff and subsequently was promoted as a Clerk . He worked as Cashier- cum- Clerk at Palm Avenue Branch of the management Dena Bank at Kolkata from August, 1991 to 18th July, 2001 and then was transferredto Shyambazar Branch of the Bank as Computer Operator on 20.10.2001. He was served with a suspension order without any show- cause/ charge- sheet and charge- sheet was served upon him after a lapse of more than 2 months alleging the workman having misappropriated the Bank's money and defrauded the Bank . Domestic enquiry was ordered and one Kishore Desai , Officer of the Regional Office of the management Bank at Kolkata was appointed as Presenting Officer and subsequently the said Presenting Officer was changed on the ground that he did not place the case properly on behalf of the management . The workman alleged that the issue of charge- sheet and consequent punishment was inflicted on non- existent complaint of customer and the workman further alleged that the charges levelled against him were imaginary and devoid of facts . At the end the workman has prayed for an Awardto the effect that the discharge of the workman from service as illegal , improper, invalid and bad in law and prayed for his reinstatement in service with retrospective effect and pay all his dues accordingly.

4. The management Bank stated in its written statement that while working at their Palm Avenue Branch asCashier- cum- Clerk , the workman used to receive cash from customers by putting cash receipt stamp on the counterfoil with his initials and used to update their Pass Books though these entries were not actually accounted in the Bank's books of accounts and he used to pocket those cash . Fact came to the light when one R.D. Account holder came for a premature payment ofhis R.D. Account amount and discrepancies were found between the balance. to her credit in the R.D. Ledger and R.D. Pass Book as the customer was possessing counterfoils and 12 such cases cameto light with a total amount of Rs . 30,300/- .Accordingly the workman was served with suspension order duly received by him on 30.10.2001 and charge- sheet dated 28.01.2002 was also issued to him . It is stated that domestic enquiry was conducted as per provision of bipartite settlement and the workman and given with all the opportunities to defend himself and subsequently he was found guilty of the misconduct levelled against him in the charge- sheet by the Enquiry Officer and thereupon the disciplinary authority discharged him from service with superannuation benefits . The management Bank has claimed that the punishment inflicted upon the workman was commensurate with the misconduct committed by him by way of embezzling with Bank's money , more so as a Cashier who is supposed to be custodian of cash and the management Bank expressed its opposition to the prayer made from the workman side .

5. This matter is pending for consideration on the adequacy of punishment of dismissal of the workman . Shri Dhanapati Halder . Earlier the matter relating to the validity of the domestic enquiry was disposed of after hearing both the parties and by passing an order by this Tribunal finding the domestic enquiry as validly done with the observation that it was done by following the principle of natural justice and it was a fair display on the part ofthe EnquiryOfficer. In view ofthe report of the Enquiry Officer inthe domestic enquiry finding the charges of misconduct against the workman as proved , the disciplinary authority passed the order of dismissal against the workman concerned .

6. In the present reference the said order of punishment has been challenged as illegal and unjustified. Now it is to be seen, at the present context as to whether the order of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority ofthe management Bank , was proportionate in respect of the misconduct done by the workman concerned.

7. In the written statement of claim , the workman concerned has challenged his discharge from service of the Bank as illegal , improper, invalid and bad in law and prayed for a direction for his reinstatement in service ofthe Bankwith retrospective effect and to pay all his dues . That means the workman concerned , represented through his union has claimed that he was not guilty of the misconduct alleged against him and thus having committed no misconduct , he has prayed for declaring his discharge or dismissal as illegal and prayed for his reinstatement with all benefits . But , since the domestic enquiry ordered by the management Bank, was found to have been validly done and in the domestic enquiry, Enquiry Officer has clearly stated that the charges of misconduct levelled against the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

present workman , has been proved and he has also found that the allegation of ( a) Willful damage to the image ofthe Bank , (b ) Misappropriate of Bank's money/ customer's money which is prejudicial to the interest of Bank and (c) Failure to discharge duties with utmost integrity , honesty, devotion and diligence have been proved. The said enquiry report was accepted by the disciplinary authority who passed the order of discharge of the present workman on four counts of charges . The said order of discharge was found to have been challenged by the workman before the appellate authority of the Bank which again , after giving all the opportunities to workman to be heard , passed an order to the effect that he found no merit in the contention of the applicant workman and the order of discharge as passed bythe disciplinary authority was upheld by him calling the same as just and commensurate with the gravity of the offence committed by the workman.

8. The workman did not challenge the order of this Tribunal finding the domestic enquiry as being validly done and so the entire episode of enquiry, dismissal and first phase ofdisposal of this reference in respect of the validity of the domestic enquiry, all were against the workman concerned .

9. Now, it is found that the allegation of misconduct by way of misappropriation of fund was levelled against the workman concerned which has been proved . The management, by employing its own executive function has conducted all procedure to be followed in the case of such grievous misconduct on the part of the workman concerned by issuing charge- sheet , ordering domestic enquiry and followed by order of discharge after giving all opportunities to the workman to defend . So , once it was decided in the domestic enquiry conducted by the management that the charges of misconduct levelled against the workman concerned were proved, interference from the Tribunal, perhaps , should not be wildly done .

10. In this respect , reference may be made to a decision reported in (2006) 5 S.C.C. 201 ( South Indian Cashew Factories Worker's Union v . Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. ) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Courtheld:

"Ifthe enquiry is fair and proper then in the absence ofany allegation of victimization or unfair labour practice the Labour Court has no power to interfere with the punishment imposed. Section 11 -A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 gives ample power to the Labour Court to reappraise the evidence adduced in the enquiry and also sit in appeal over the decision of the employer in imposing punishment ..... "

Inthe present case , such an allegation ofvictimization has not been raised from the side of the workman and the allegation of unfair labour practice has been raised and

8721

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011/अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

that matter was widely discussed in the matter upholding the domestic enquiry as walidly done . In that context, scope of interference by this Tribunal becomes nill .

In another decision reported in ( 2000) 7 S.C.C. 517 [ Janatha Bazar ( South Canara) Central Cooperative Wholesale Store Ltd. v Secy. Sahakary Naukarara Sangha] wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held:

"After finding that charges against the workman for breach of trust and misappropriation offunds entrusted to them for the value mentioned in the charge- sheet had been established , the Labour Court materially erred in setting aside the order passed by the management removing the workmen concerned from service and reinstating them with 25% back wages . Once an act of misappropriation is proved, may be for small or large amount, there is no question of showing uncalled for sympathy and reinstating the employees in service .

In case of proved misappropriation , there is no question of considering the past recrod. It is the discretion of the employer to consider the same in appropriate cases , but the Labour Court cannot substitute the penalty imposed by the employer in such cases ."

Inyet another case , reported in (2006 ) 12 S.C.C. 554 (Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v . Ν.Κ. Sing ) wherein the Hon'ble apex Court held:

"Wefind that the Labour Court has found the enquiry to be fair and proper. The conduct highlighted by the management and established in enquiry was certainly ofa very grave nature . The Labour Court and High Court had not found the misconduct was ofanyminor nature . On the contrary, the finding on facts that the act complained of has not been disturbed. That being so , the leniency shown by the Labour Court is certainly unwarranted and would in fact , encourage indiscipline . Without indicating any reason as to why it was felt that the punishment was disproportionate, the Labour Court should not have passed the order in the manner done ....... " 11. In the context , the submission made on behalf of the Workmen Union may be mentioned . It is submitted by the representative of the Workmen Union that no action can be taken against unenumarated miscounduct and it has been further stated that the charges alleged to have beenproved is not wilful damage to the image of the Bank since no depositor was asked to lead evidence and to cross- examine tham . It is further submitted that no question of misappropriation of money was proved since no loss was incurred either by the Bank or by the complainants . No proof of failure to discharge duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and claimed that the charges ware not proved . It is further pleaded that he 8722

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii ) ] miscounduct can at best be treated as minor misconduct in the style of " neglect of work , negligence in performing duties."

Shakespeare Sarani , Mangal Kalash , 5th Floor, Kolkata- 700071 in dismissing the service of the workman , Shri Dhanapati Halder, Cashier-cum- Cleark ofShyam Bazar Branch was legal and justified and accordingly the workman concerned is not entitled to any reliefàs prayed for.

An Award is accordingly passed .

JUSTICE MANIK MOHAN SARKAR, PresidingOfficer

Dated, Kolkata,

The30th September, 2011.

नई दिल्ली 31 , अक्तूबर, 2011

का०आ० 3411 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार आई डी बी आई बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरणा/ श्रम न्यायालय -2 मुम्बई के पंचाट पार्ट-1 ( संदर्भ संख्या सीजीआईटी -2/27 ऑफ 2008 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 17-10-11 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं॰एल-12012/16/2008- आईआर ( बी 2 ) ] रमेश सिंह, डेस्क अधिकारी New Delhi , the 31st October, 2011 12. In course of his submission , the authorized representative of the Workmen Union/workman referredto some cases dealt with by the management Bank in respect of other officers and employees of the Bank doing such misconduct calling for a stringent action but , were let free with some minor punishment like withdrawal of few increments and reinstating to the service. In this contest the workman side cited some decisions as reported in 2003- I-LLI 604 ( AP) ( Satyanarayanmma G. v . Canara Bank , Bangalore and Others) and 1994- II- LLI - 1173 (All .) ( Gopal Das Rawat v . U.P. State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.) I have gone through both the decisions and I do not find applicability of those two decisions in the present context. I cannot accept the submission on behalf of the workman that the charges have not been proved since in the previous paragraphs it has already been stated that the domestic enquiry was held to have been validly done and there was no denial of natural justice to the workman concerned in course of domestic enquiry and the Enquiry Officer has already reported that the charges of misconduct levelled against the workman concerned were proved. It has also been discussed in earlier paragraphs that interference by this Tribunal has been restricted by the decisions discussed earlier.

S.O. 3411. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Part - I ( Ref. No. CGIT- 2/27 of 2008) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court -2, MUMBAI now as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of I.D.B.I. Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 17/10/2011 .

[No.L - 12012/ 16/2008 - IR(B- II) ] RAMESH SINGH, Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI 13.1 also cannot appreciate the submission made on behalf of the workman that some other officers and employees weredealt with some lighter punishment though they had done major misconduct . Firstly, the type of misconduct they had done has not been stated nor it has beenshown what types of misconduct were proved against those officers/ employees . Secondly, in the act of punishment, it is to be seen whether the punishing authority has exceeded its jurisdiction. Normal procedure is to punish a person doing misconduct in proportionate with the misconduct done . The management/employer may decide to punish a person with lighter punishment with an observation why it was so done . But, that cannot be cited as an example for claiming lighter punishment by the present workman since in the course of punishment inflicted by the employer for doing misconduct by any workman , the right to equality cannot be pleaded.

PRESENT Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑKE PresidingOfficer

REFERENCE NO. CGIT- 2/27 of 2008

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF I.D.B.I. BANK

14. In reference to all the discussions made above , I do not find any reason to interfere with the decision ofthe management Bank in discharging the present workmanwhich has been done with superannuation benefit and this act of the management/employer, shows that it had not mind to victimize the present workman and earlier it has also been stated that no unfair labour practice was done against the present workman, in course of the domestic enquiry.

TheDeputyGeneral Manager ( ER ) IDBI Bank HR Deptt . IDBI Ltd. 21st floor, D-Wing, IDBI Tower WTC Complex , Cuffe Parade Mumbai 400005.

15.Accordingly, the action of the management of Dena Bank, Regional Office, East India Operation , 2-1 , [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

AND

THEIR WORKMAN

Shri Keshav Shriyan

FlatNo. 219/5863 IDBI Staff Quarters R.N. Narkar Marg Ghatkopar(E) Mumbai 400075

APPEARANCES :

FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. R.S. Pai , Advocate FOR THE WORKMAN : Ms. Anjali Purav , Advocate Mumbai , dated the 5th August 2011 .

AWARD PART- 1

The Government of India , Ministry of Labour & Employment by its Order No. L- 12012 / 16 / 2008 - IR ( B - II ) , dated 30.04.2008 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub- section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 have referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of IDBI Bank Ltd, Mumbai in alleged illegal termination of the services of Shri Keshavan Shriyan isjustified? Ifnot, what relief the workman is entitled to ? " 2. After receipt of the reference , both the parties were served with notices . They appeared in the reference through their respective representatives . The second party workman filed his statement of claim at Ex - 6 . According to him , first party management employed him in August, 1978 as a Peon . He was promoted as Subhedar and thereafter as a Sorting Clerk . The workman rendered 29 years of service . He was sincere in performing his duties . His record is unblemished. Police have implicated him in a false case and the Bank authority relied on the police report . They made a farce of inquiry and terminated the service of the workman w.e.f. 11/6/2004 . The chargesheet dated 9/4/2003 is totally vague and false. Infact there are no charges levelled against him . The inquiry conducted was not fair and proper . On earlier occasion similar type of chargesheet dated 19/4/2002 was issued to the workman alleging that he had wrongfully obtained demand drafts which were issued in the name of the Bank . In the departmental inquiry the said charges were not proved. The demand draft at Mumbai branch was encashed by some outsider . The Bank had therefore taken disadvantage of the police inquiry and without any independent evidence they had implicated the workman and held that he had wrongfully obtained the demand draft and passed the same to the outsider.

3. The inquiry officer was bias , He helped the Bank in all possible ways . The principles of natural justice were not followed. The inquiry officer relying on the police report, 4182 G1/11-24

8723

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

without any evidence held the workman guilty. Relying on his report , Bank has terminated his services and also passed an order to recover an amount of Rs . 2,08,000/- from the terminal dues of the workman . According to him , three demand drafts of the amount of Rs . 14,79,069/ - were similarly misplaced and encashed by some outsiders . However Bank has not taken action against the sorting clerk or against any other employees working at the head office . The workman is victimized unnecessarily. The inquiry against him is not fair and proper. The findings of the inquiry officer are perverse . The order of termination based on such findings is not legal and proper . Therefore the second party workman prays that said order of termination dated 11/06/ 2004 be set aside and quashed. He also prays that he be reinstated with full backwages and incidental benefits with continuity of service from 11/06/2004 .

4.The first party management resisted the statement of claim vide its written statement at Ex - 8 . According to them , the termination of second party was effected on the basis of report of inquiry officer in the departmental inquiry. He was held guilty of an act of serious misconduct . The workman was served with the chargesheet . He fully participated in the inquiry proceeding. Shri N.A. Indulkar an office bearer of union was his defence representative . The inquiry officer found him guilty for obtaining a demand draft No. 47017 dated 24/05/2001 of Rs . 2,08,000/ - issued by Lord Krishna Bank Ltd. Coimbatore in favour of IDBI Bank. The second party was found guilty for having passed the said DD to Shri Sandeep Parshuram Jadhav alias Narendra S. More . It was presented for clearing by Pariwarthan Co- op Bank Ltd. on 1/6/2001 on behalf ofM/s. Indian Dyes Bleach and Inks a sole proprietary concern of Shri Narendra S. More who had withdrawn major portion ofthe proceeds . During investigation of the crime , certain amount was recovered from the second party . Earlier also three DDs issued in favour of IDBI Bank were fraudulently encashed. On complaint of Bank authority, Police have arrested the second party. He was also put under suspension w.e.f. 19/10/2009 . Chargesheet was issued and departmental inquiry was initiated against the second party. However no penalty was imposed on the second party as he was given benefit of doubt. The said incident is not the subject matter of the inquiry in question.

5. They denied that entire service of the workman was unblemished and he was sincere workman . They denied that workman was falsely implicated in the case by the police and authorities relied on the police report and issued chargesheet to the second party . The inquiry officer found him guility of the charges levelled against him viz . misconduct relating to obtaining demand draft wrongfully ofRs . 2,08,000/- . The inquiry officer held him guilty being instrumental in fraudulently encashing the amount with the help of his accomplice by using fictitious accounts . They denied that chargesheet was vague and no charges were levelled against the workman . According to them the 8724

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 ( ii) ]

proceeding at a time. The workman has also admitted inhis cross that pages 18 to 32 bear signature of his defence representative Shri Indulkar.

inquiry officer has given full opportunity to workmanto defend himself. He arrived at the conclusion that the workman was guity of the charges levelled against him . On the basis of his report, the competent authority terminated the services of the workman . According to them the workman is not entitled to the reliefs claimed for. Therefore they pray that the reference be dismissed with cost . The second party workman denied the contents in the written statement by filling his rejoinder at Ex- 9 . He also repeated the contents in the statement of claim .

6. My Id Predecessor has framed the following preliminary issues for my determination , I record my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:

Findings

Sr. Preliminary issues No.

No.

1. Is the inquiry fair and proper?

Yes.

2. Is the finding of the inquiry officer perverse?

REASONS

Issues nos . 1 &2:---

9. The workman has made grievance about some irregularity in supplying copies of inquiry proceedings . In this respect the inquiry officer has also submitted in his cross at Ex - 15 that copies of the proceedings of first and second sitting were given to the workman on the third sitting and copies of the third sitting were given to him on fourth sitting and signatures of workman were obtained in the beginning of the next sitting . He has explained in his cross that steno used to type the entire proceeding and used to give him a rough draft after about two hours ofthe proceeding. The inquiry officer has further explained inhis cross that Mr. Indulkar , Mr. Nerurkar, Mr. Shriyan the workmenwere not waiting for two hours and copies of first and second sitting were given to the workman on third sitting. The workman was defended by Mr. Indulkar who is the office bearer of the union . The workman has filedhis reply to the chargesheet . On his behalf Mr. Indulkar has taken part in the proceeding . Neither workman nor his defence representative or the union made any complaint to the higher authority in respect of any irregularity or for not giving the copies of the proceedings on the same day. Furthermore, I would like to point out that late furnishing of the copies of inquiry proceeding cannot be called irregularity in conducting the inquiry. In short there was no violation of principle of natural justice . The workman was chargesheeted. The copy of chargesheet is on record. Thus it cannot be said that there was no charge as has beenalleged.

7. Both these points are interlinked. Hence in order to avoid repetition of discussion they are discussed and decided simultaneously. It is submitted on behalf of the second party workman that the inquiry officer did not follow the principles of natural justice as he did not give sufficient opportunitytothe workman to defend himself. Further it is submitted that there was no charge against the workman and there was no evidence . On the other hand the Id adv. for the second party workman submitted that the inquiry officer merely relied upon the report ofpolice investigation and held the second party workman guilty. According to him, the inquiry officer was bias towards the management . For all these reasons inquiry cannot be called fair and proper. Therefore he submitted that findings of inquiry officer are perverse . I would like to examine each of these averments and objections to the inquiry proceedings .

10. In the case at hand , the Id adv for the second partyworkman has pointed out that the inquiry officer has not examined any witness and the inquiry report is based onthe statements recorded by police . The inquiry officer Mr. I.S. Kalra in his cross at Ex- 15 para 10 thereof has admitted that no witnesses were examined in the inquiry. According to him, the Presenting Officer has only filed exhibits which are on record. In his affidavit para 5 thereof at Ex - 15 , this witness says that during the course of inquiry neither the management nor the workman wanted to lead any oral evidence and both the parties have agreed to argue their cases on the basis of material on record. In para 4, this witness says that the management has produced various documents in support of the charges . This witness seems to have relied upon the statement recorded by Police. Especially the statements of the workman and others who were accused in the criminal case registered against them. The copy of FIR in criminal case and the copies of statements recorded by police of the accused and witnesses as well are not admissible in evidence . The inquiry officer relied on the statements recorded by police. He has not examined any witness during the course of inquiry. Though 8. In respect ofprinciples of natural justice , I would like to point out that it is the case of the first party management that the chargesheet dated 9/4/2003 was served on the workman . The workman has admitted in his cross examination at Ex - 13 , para 8 wherein he has admittedthat he was served with chargesheet dt . 9/4/2003. He further admitted that vide his replydt . 17/4/2003 he had replied the chargesheet . The workman has admitted in his cross that the inquiry was conducted by the inquiry officer Mr. I.S. Kalra as per said chargesheet . He has further admitted that he was represented by Mr. Indulkar in the said inquiry. He has also admitted his signatures on the inquiry proceedings . However, his contention is unacceptable that his signatures were taken at a time on all those proceedings . When Mr. Indulkar the office bearer of the union was his defence representative , workman was not supposed to sign the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

the inquiry officer has given exhibit numbers to the police papers and has relied upon the police papers , specially the confession of the accused recorded therein by the police officer . Such documents are not admissible in evidence. Though the provisions of Evidence Act are not followed strictly, however the basic principles of law of evidence cannot be lost sight of in toto . Section 25 & 26 of Evidence Act create express bar to read in evidence the statement of accused , recorded by police officer and the statement of accused recorded in presence of a police officer are not admissible in evidence . Article 20 ( 3 ) of Constitution of India prohibits testimonial compulsion . The statement of accused recorded by police is generally treated as a testimonial compulsion . Section 25 & 26 of Evidence Act are based on the same principle . In short , statement of the workman and other accused recorded by police officer during the course of investigation cannot be accepted as evidence . Furthermore statements of other witnesses recorded by police are also not acceptable in evidence .

11. In the circumstances , the inquiry cannot be called fairand proper as inquiry officer haş merely relied upon the police papers and has relied upon the statements recorded by police . For the same reason , findings of inquiry officer are perverse . Accordingly, I decide the issue no. 1 in the negative & issue no . 2 in the affirmative . Thus I proceed to pass the following order:

ORDER

(i) The inquriy and finding of the inquiry officer are hereby set aside .

( ii ) The parties to lead their respective evidence in respect of the charges levelled against workman.

(iii) Next date is fixed on 07.12.2011 for the evidence of firstparty.

Date: 05.08.2011

Κ.Β. ΚΑΤΑΚΕ , Presiding Officer / Judge नई दिल्ली, 1 नवम्बर , 2011

का०आ० 3412 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार भारतीय स्टेट बैंक प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद मे केन्दीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 35/2004 ) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 1-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[फाइल संख्या एल -12012/04/ 2004- आई० आर० ( बी -1 ) ] रमेश सिंह , डेस्क अधिकारी

8725

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

New Delhi , 1st November, 2011

S.O. 3412 .-- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the Award Ref. 35/2004 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal - cum -Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen , received by the Central Government on 01/11/2011 .

[No. L- 12012/4/ 2004- IR (B- I) ] RAMESH SINGH , Desk Officer

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- CUM - LABOUR COURT , BHUBANESWAR Present:

SHRI JITENDRA SRIVASTAVA , Presiding Officer , C.G.I.T. - cum - Labour Court , Bhubaneswar.

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE No. 35/2004 Date of Passing Award - 19th October , 2011 Between:

The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India , Parlakhemundi Branch , Parlakhemundi , Orissa

... 1st Party-Management .

AND

Shri O. Prasad Rao ,

Bata Gouda Street , At/Po . Parlakhemundi , Gajapati , Orissa .

2nd Party-Workman .

APPEARANCES:

Mrs. Soubhagya Swain Manager( Law)

For the 1st Party- Management.

None

Forthe 2nd Party- Workman .

AWARD

The Government of India in the Ministry of Labour has referred the present dispute existing between the employers in relation to the Management of State Bank of India and their workman in exercise of the powers conferred by clause ( d ) of sub - section ( 1 ) and sub - section 2 ( a ) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 vide its letter No. L - 12012 / 4 / 2004 / IR ( B - I ) dated 07.06.2004 to this Tribunal for adjudication to the following effect:

8726

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 / AGRAHAYAΝΑ 5 , 1933

"Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India, Parlakhemundi by not giving appointment to Shri O. Prasad Rao, Temporary Messenger even though he was selected in the Panel List is legal and justified? If not what relief he is entitled to? "

2. The disputant workman in pursuance of the order of reference has filed a very short Statement of Claim in which he had stated that he has worked as temporary messenger at Parlakhemundi branch of the State Bank of India for 746 days from 1978 to 1997. He has a very large family to maintain and is unabled to meet the daily requirement of his family. He was called for interview and kept inpanel after selection . But he was not appointed. He had worked for more than 240 days in the year 1998. He also approached the Labour Commissioner ( Central ), Bhubaneswar. But nothing was done. He has filed photostat copies of certain documents in support ofhis claim .

3. The 1st Party Management has filed the Written Statement and stated that the reference made by the Central Government is defective . It does not relate either to reinstatement orto regularization of service. The 2nd Party- workmanhas filed a very short Statement of Claim , which is devoid of adequate pleadings so as to appreciate the facts and to pass an effective award. The workman was never appointed in accordance with the rules , but was engaged whenever work was available . His disengagement from service cannot be construed to be retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act. During the period of March , 1978 to March , 1980 he was engaged casually and intermittently as a messenger on temporary/daily wage basis for 153 days . After a long gap he was again engaged for a period of596 days from November, 1994 to May, 1997 . Now he is being engaged by the Local Implementation Committee as a canteen boy in the canteen of the State Bank ofIndia, Pariakhemundi branch since 1998. With view to giving a chance to various temporary employees/daily wagers engaged by the Bank in its various branches for absorption as per setilements entered into between the Management of the State Bank of India and the All India StateBank of India Employees' Federation in the year 1987 and afterwards the disputant workman amongst others was called for interview in the year 1994. On the basis ofmarks obtained in the interview and length of service the 2nd Party- workman was empanelled in Category ' C ' at Serial No. 30 in the supplementary list. After being wait- listed he was engaged by the branch on temporary basis . But Sl . No. 30 of the supplementary panel list could not reach tothe appointment and his services were discontinued . As per agreement the panel lapsed on 31st March , 2007 and therefore he could not be given appointment . He has no further right to claim appointment. The chain has been laid after lapse of 06 ( six) years . The workı man has never completed 240days of service in a calendar year preceding the date of his disengagement. He is neither entitled for

[PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii) ] reinstatement nor regularization . His claim is liable to be dismissed.

4. On the pleadings of the parties following issues were framed:

ISSUES

(1 ) "Whether the action of the Management of State Bank of India , Parlakhemundi by not giving appointment to Shri O. Prasad Rao , Temporary Messenger even though he was selected in the Panel List is legal andjustified?

(2) If not what relief he is entitled to?

5.Thedisputant workman after filling his statement ofclaim appeared in court only on few dates and on most of the dates he was found absent even though several notices by the court were sent to him through ordinary and registered post. Ultimately the case was proceeded ex-parte against the 2nd party workman viue order dated 3.1.2011.

6. The 1st Party Management has adduced the evidence of Shri Sarat Chandra Behera , Cheif Manager, State Bank of India , Parlakhemundi branch through affidavit . The 1st Party Managerment has also filed certain documents in the shape of xerox copies marked as Ext. - 1to Ext.- 10.

FINDINGS

ISSUE No. 1

7. The 2nd Party Workman has laid his claims on the basis or rendering 746 days of service in the Parlakhemundi branch of the State Bank of India from the year 1978 to 1997. He has filed photostat copies of two certificates given tohim by the concerned Bank wherein the year - wise break- up of service rendered by him in Parlakhemundi branch of the State Bank of India is given . But , these certificates have not been proved in evidence . Hence , no reliance can be made on them . However, from the side of the 1st Party Management it has been admitted in Para - 5 of its written statement that the 2nd party workman has rendered 153 days of work from March , 1978 to March, 1980 and 596 days work from November, 1994 to May, 1997. According to the 1st party- Management the 2nd party- Workman was disengaged from service in May, 1997. Whatever work he has done thereafter, he has done on engagement by the Local Implementation Committee as a canteen boy. It has been further contended by the 1st Party - Management that the 2nd party - workman has not completed 240 days of work during a period of 12 ( twelve ) calendar months preceding the date of his disengagement . The 2nd party- workman did not turn up to stand in witness box to disprove the contention of the 1st party- Management . He has not even stated as to when he was terminated from service . The two certificates filed by him in the shape ofxerox copies regarding his days of work cannot be relied upon as they [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

have not been proved in evidence and therefore it cannot be held that the 2nd party - workman had rendered 240 days continuous service during a period of 12 ( twelve ) calendar months preceding the date of his disengagement .

8. So far as the nature of employment with the 1st party Management is concerned, it was in the nature of casual or temporary employment . The 2nd party workman has not alleged that he was appointed on regular basis or in a permanent post according to recruitment rules of the Bank . The casual and temporary employees cannot claim permanent post and do not have any right to future employment or regularization after disengagement . He was given a chance to appear in an interview for permanent appointment and he was empanelled and kept at Sl . No. 30 in the supplementary list. But that number could not reach till the validity period of the panel list and the panel lapsed on 31st March , 1997. Therefore the 2nd party workman could not be appointed on permanent basis and with the lapse of the panel list his services were disengaged.

9. In the above background , the action of the Management of the State Bank of India , Parlakhemundi branch by not giving appointment to Shri O. Prasad Rao a temporary messenger even though he was selected in the panel list is found to be legal and justified . Issue No. 1 is thus decided against the 2nd party - workman .

ISSUE No. 2

10. In view of what has been stated in issue No. 1 , the 2nd party - workman is not entitled to any relief whatsoever claimed for .

11. The reference is answered accordingly.

Dictated & Corrected by me .

J. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर , 2011

का०आ० 3413 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्दिरा गाँधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध 1 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं० 1, दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 121/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2 11 2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -42012/ 216/2010 - आई० आर० ( डी०यू० ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव New Delhi the 2nd November, 2011

S.O. 3413. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 121 /

8727

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

2011 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indira Gandhi National Open University and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

[No. L-42012/ 216/ 2010- IR(DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI I.D. NO . 121/2011

Sh . Mukesh S/ o Sh . Murari Lal,

R/ o H.No. 325 ,

Church Gali Assola Fhathe Pur Bery, New Delhi .

Claimant

Versus

The Vice Chancellor ,

IGNOU , Maidan Gari ,

New Delhi .

Management

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of IGNOU in terminating the services of their workman Shri Mukesh S / o Shri Murari Lal w.e.f. 03/10/2007 is legal and justified ? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

2. In the order of reference , the appropriate Government directed the Claimant to file his claim statement within 15 days from the receipt of the reference order . Despite the directions , so made , no claim statement was 8728

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

filed.

4.The University was called upon to file its response to the reference order. The University filed its written statement , out of which it emerged that housekeeping services were outsourced on the strength of agreement dated 1.1.2004 entered into between the University and the Contractor. It has been pleaded that the claimant was an employee of the contractor and not of the University . Relevant clauses of the agreement are reproduced in the written statement , which are extracted thus:

"12. Provider shall continue to be responsible forthe personnel employed by him , in respect of terms and conditions of their service , payments , attendance , medical care , other disciplinary matters etc. who shall remain fully under the administrative and financial control and supervision of the Provider, except that the University shall be the sole Arbitrator in respect of nature of the duties to be entrusted to and the manner ofpermanence of their duties for the purpose ofthis Agreement .

13. The temporary personnel deployed by the Provider to IGNOU shall at no time be treated as the employees of the University and also shall have no claim to be regularized in the services of the University. But the Provider will not change the personnel once deployed by it in the University without prior permission of the University as the frequent changes in deployment of temporary may hamper the day to day work of the University.

23. There is no privity of contract by and between the Provider and the University. The Temporary shall have no right to make any claim against the University directly or indirectly, monetary including wages or otherwise . The Temporary shall also have no claim against the University of any dues, statutory or otherwise. Similarly, even the representatives of any Temporary , who have worked in the University shall have no right or claim against the University.

24. The Provider has to ensure that the Temporaries deployed are not forming any Association/Forum in respect of IGNOU matter nor they should be allowed tojoin in anyAssociation/forum of IGNOU.

25. The Provider has to ensure timely deployment of

[PART II-SEC . 3(ii) )

== Temporaries as required by IGNOU and fulfil other obligation stated in the above said terms and conditions failing which penalty willbe imposed by the University on case to cases basis from time to time. The decision of the University will be final" .

5. When contract between the University and the Contractor expired on 31.10.2007 with efflux oftime, contract to provide housekeeping services was given to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt . ) Ltd. It led the claimant and others to resort to illegal demonstration in the University premises .A suit for injunction was filed before High Court ofDelhi , wherein an interim order was granted in favour of the University and against the housekeeping staff. On 13.3.2009 suit was decreed in favour of the University. The University claims that neither employer and employee relationship exists between the parties nor there is an industrial dispute , which may give jurisdiction to this Tribunal to adjudicate it .

6.As pointed above , claimant had opted not to file his claim statement . The University came with a plea that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor. His services came to an end when agreement between the University and the Contractor, to provide housekeeping services , came to an end on 31.10.2007 . Relevant clauses of the agreement are brought to the notice of the Tribunal with an intention to project that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor, who exercised financial , administrative as well as disciplinary control over him . On the face of these facts , the terms of reference are uncalled for . The appropriate Government has not referred a question to the effect as to whether agreement between the University and the Contractor is sham and bogus , which would have led this Tribunal to adjudicate the gravamen of the case raised by the University. This Tribunal is bound bythe terms of reference and cannot enlarge its scope.All these circumstances and vacuum of facts from the side of the claimant, besides case projected by the University make it clear that there was no privity of contract between the parties and award of contract for housekeeping services to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt. ) Ltd. could not raise an industrial dispute , terms of which are detailed in preceding sections. The appropriate Government was not competent to refer the dispute for adjudication . In view of these reasons an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Dated: 19.10.2011

नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर, 2011

का०आ० 3414औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्दिरा गाँधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

1 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में अधिकरण नं० 1, दिल्ली के 118/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, 2 11 2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था । केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को [सं० एल-42012/ 218 /2010- आई० आर० ( डी०यू० ) ]

जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव New Delhi the 2nd November , 2011

S.O. 3414. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref . No. 118/ 2011 ) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indira Gandhi National Open University and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

[No. L -42012/ 218 /2010- IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO . 1 , KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI I.D. NO . 118/2011

Sh. Deepak,

R/ o H.No. 136 , Gali No. 3 , Harijan Basti , Neb Sarai , New Delhi .

8729

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

42012/ 218 /2010- IR( DU) , New Delhi , dated 21.03.2011 , with the following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of IGNOU in terminating the services of their workman Shri Deepak w.e.f. 03/10/2007 is legal and justified? What reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date?"

2. In the order of reference , the appropriate Government directed the Claimant to file his claim statement within 15 days from the receipt of the reference order. Despite the directions , so made , no claim statement was filed.

4. The University was called upon to file its response to the reference order. The University filed its written statement , out of which it emerged that housekeeping services were outsourced on the strength of agreement dated 1.1.2004 entered into between the University and the Contractor. It has been pleaded that the claimant was an employee of the contractor and not of the University. Relevant clauses of the agreement are reproduced in the written statement , which are extracted thus:

Workman

Versus

The Vice Chancellor , IGNOU , Maidan Gari , New Delhi .

Management

AWARD

Indira Gandhi National Open University ( herein - after referred to as the University ) outsourced housekeeping services to Sybex Computer Systems ( Pvt . ) Ltd. (herein- after referred to as the Contractor ) vide agreement dated 01.11.2004 . Subsequently the terms of agreement were extended upto 31.10.2007. Deepak, the claimant , was working with the Contractor, who provided housekeeping services in the campus of the University . Services of the claimant were dispensed with on 3.10.2007 . He raised a demand on the University for reinstatement of his services . When his demand was not conceded to , he raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer. On failure of the conciliation proceedings , the appropriate Government referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide Order No. L- '12. Provider shall continue to be responsible for the personnel employed by him , in respect of terms and conditions of their service , payments , attendance , medical care , other disciplinary matters etc. who shall remain fully under the administrative and financial control and supervision of the Provider, except that the University shall be the sole Arbitrator in respect of nature of the duties to be entrusted to and the manner ofpermanence of their duties for the purpose ofthis Agreement .

23. There is no privity of contract by and between the Provider and the University. The Temporary shall have no right to make any claim against the 8730

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933 [PART II-SEC. 3 (ii)]

preceding sections . The appropriate Government was not competent to refer the dispute for adjudication. In view of these reasons an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication.

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Universitydirectly or indirectly , monetary including wages or otherwise . The Temporary shall also have no claim against the University of any dues , statutory or otherwise . Similarly , even the representatives of any Temporary, who have worked in the University shall have no right or claim against theUniversity.

Dated: 19.10.2011

नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर , 2011 24. The Provider has to ensure that the Temporaries deployed are not forming any Association/Forum in respect of IGNOU matter nor they should be allowed tojoin in anyAssociation/forum of IGNOU.

का० आ० 3415 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में, केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्दिरा गांधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं० 1, दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 118/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था।

25. The Provider has to ensure timely deployment of Temporaries as required by IGNOU and fulfil other obligation stated in the above said terms and conditions failing which penalty will be imposed by the University on case to cases basis from time to time . The decision of the University will be final " .

[सं० एल-42012/217/ 2010 आई० आर०( डी०यू० ) ] जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव

New Delhi the 2nd November, 2011

S.O. 3415. In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby published the award ( Ref. No. 118 / 2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indira Gandhi National Open University and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

5. When contract between the University and the Contractor expired on 31.10.2007 with efflux of time, contract to provide housekeeping services was given to Spick & Span Facilities Management (Pvt .) Ltd. It led the claimant and others to resort to illegal demonstration in the University premises . A suit for injunction was filed before High Court ofDelhi , wherein an interim order was granted in favour of the University and against the housekeeping staff. On 13.3.2009 suit was decreed in favour of the University. The University claims that neither employer and employee relationship exists between the parties nor there is an industrial dispute , which may give jurisdiction to this Tribunal to adjudicate it.

[No. L-42012/217/2010- IR (DU)] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1 KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 117/2011

Sh . Rakesh S/ o Late Nathu Ram , R/o H.No. 136 , Gali No. 3 , Harijan Basti , Neb Sarai , New Delhi .

Claimant

Versus

The Vice Chancellor, IGNOU, Maidan Gari , New Delhi .

Management

AWARD

Indira Gandhi National Open University (herein- after referred to as the University) outsourced housekeeping 6.As pointed above , claimant had opted not to file claim statement . The University came with a plea that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor. His services came to an end when agreement between the University andthe Contractor, to provide housekeeping services , came to an end on 31.10.2007 . Relevant clauses of the agreement are brought to the notice of the Tribunal with an intention to project that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor, who exercised financial , administrative as well asdisciplinary control over him . On the face of these facts , the terms of reference are uncalled for. The appropriate Government has not referred a question to the effect as to whether agreement between the University and the Contractor is sham and bogus , which would have led this Tribunal to adjudicate the gravamen of the case raised by the University. This Tribunal is bound by the terms of reference and cannot enlarge its scope . All these circumstances and vacuum of facts from the side of the claimant , besides case projected by the University make it clear that there was no privity of contract between the parties and award of contract for housekeeping services to Spick & SpanFacilities Management (Pvt .) Ltd. could not raise an industrial dispute , terms of which are detailed in [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii) ]

services to Sybex Computer Systems (Pvt .) Ltd. (herein- after referred to as the Contractor) vide agreement dated 01.11.2004. Subsequently the terms of agreement were extended upto 31.10.2007 . Rakesh, the claimant, was working withthe Contractor, who provided housekeeping services in the campus of the University. Services of the claimant were dispensed with on 3.10.2007. He raised a demand on . the University for reinstatement of his services . When his demand was not conceded to , he raised a dispute before the Conciliation Officer. On failure of the conciliation proceedings , the appropriate Government referredthe dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication , vide Order No. L-42012/217/2010- IR(DU) , New Delhi, dated 21.03.2011 , with the following terms:

"Whether the action of the management of IGNOU in terminating the services of their workman Shri Rakesh w.e.f. 03/10/2007 is legal and justified? What reliefthe workman is entitled to and from which date?"

2. In the order of reference , the appropriate Government directed the Claimant to file his claim statement within 15 days from the receipt of the reference order. Despite the directions , so made , no claim statement was filed.

4. The University was called upon to file its response to the reference order. The University filed its written statement, out of which it emerged that housekeeping services were outsourced on the strength of agreement dated 1.1.2004 entered into between the University and the Contractor. It has been pleaded that the claimant was an employee of the contractor and not of the University. Relevant clauses of the agreement are reproduced in the written statement, which are extracted thus:

" 12. Provider shall continue to be responsible for the personnel employed by him, in respect of terms and conditions of their service , payments , attendance , medical care , other disciplinary matters etc. who shall remain fully under the administrative and financial control and supervision of the Provider , except that the University shall be the sole Arbitrator in respect of nature of the duties to be entrusted to and the manner ofpermanence of their duties for the purpose ofthisAgreement.

13. The temporary personnel deployed by the Provider to IGNOU shall at no time be treated as the 4182 G1/11-25

8731

भारत का राजपत्र : नवम्बर 26, 2011/अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

employees of the University and also shall have no claim to be regularized in the services of the University. But the Provider will not change the personnel once deployed by it in the University without prior permission of the University as the frequent changes in deployment of temporary may hamper the day to day work of the University.

23. There is no privity of contract by and between the Provider and the University. The Temporary shall have no right to make any claim against the University directly or indirectly, monetary including wages or otherwise . The Temporary shall also have no claim against the University of any dues , statutory or otherwise . Similarly, even the representatives of any Temporary, who have worked in the University shall have no right or claim against the University.

24. The Provider has to ensure that the Temporaries deployed are not forming any Association/Forum in respect of IGNOU matter nor they should be allowed tojoin in any Association/ forum of IGNOU.

5. When contract between the University and the Contractor expired on 31.10.2007 with efflux of time, contract to provide housekeeping services was given to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt . ) Ltd. It led the claimant and others to resort to illegal demonstration in the University premises . A suit for injunction was filedbefore High Court ofDelhi , wherein an interim order was granted in favour of the University and against the housekeeping staff. On 13.3.2009 suit was decreed in favour of the University. The University claims that neither employer and employee relationship exists between the parties nor there is an industrial dispute , which may give jurisdiction to this Tribunal to adjudicate it .

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[PART II-SEC. 3 (ii) ]

The Vice Chancellor , IGNOU, MaidanGari , NewDelhi .

Management

AWARD

the case raised by the University. This Tribunal is bound by the terms of reference and cannot enlarge its scope.All these circumstances and vacuum of facts from the side of the claimant ,besides case projects by the University make it clear that there was no privity of contract between the parties and award of contract for housekeeping services to Spick & Span Facilities Management (Pvt. ) Ltd. could not raise an industrial dispute , terms of which are detailed in preceding sections . The appropriate Government was not competent to refer the dispute for adjudication. In view of these reasons an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriateGovernment for publication.

Dr. R.K. YADAV, PresidingOfficer

i Dated: 19.10.2011

नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर, 2011

का०आ० 3416 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्दिरा गाँधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध 1 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं० 1, दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 117/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2 11 2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

"Whether the action of the management of IGNOU interminatingthe services of their workman Shri Raj Palw.e.f. 03/10/2007 is legal andjustified? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date?" [सं० एल -42012/220/2010- आई० आर० ( डी०यू०) ] जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव

New Delhi , The 2nd November, 2011

2. In the order of reference , the appropriate Government directed the Claimant to file his claim statement within 15 days from the receipt of the reference order. Despite the directions , so made , no claim statement was filed.

S.O. 3416.-.In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 120/ 2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. 1 , Delhi as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indira Gandhi National Open University and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

[No. L-42012/220/2010- IR(DU) ] Johan Topno , Under Secretary

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1 KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 120/2011

Sh . Raj Pal

4. The University was called upon to file its response to the reference order. The University filed its written statement, out of which it emerged that housekeeping services were outsourced on the strength of agreement dated 1.1.2004 entered into between the University and the Contractor. It has been pleaded that the claimant was an employee of the contractor and not of the University. Relevant clauses of the agreement are reproduced in the written statement, which are extracted thus :

R/ o A-45 , Gali No. 1,

HarijanBasti , Neb Sarai ,

NewDelhi.

Workman

Versus

remain fully under the administrative and financial control and supervision of the Provider , except that the University shall be the sole Arbitrator in respect of nature of the duties to be entrusted to and the manner of permanence of their duties for the purpose of this Agreement.

23. There is no privity of contract by and between the Provider and the University. The Temporary shall have no right to make any claim against the University directly or indirectly , monetary including wages or otherwise . The Temporary shall also have no claim against the University of any dues , statutory or otherwise . Similarly , even the representatives of any Temporary, who have worked in the University shall have no right or claim against the University.

8733

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

University and the Contractor , to provide housekeeping services , came to an end on 31.10.2007 . Relevant clauses of the agreement are brought to the notice of the Tribunal with an intention to project that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor , who exercised financial , administrative as well as disciplinary control over him . On the face of these facts , the terms of reference are uncalled for. The appropriate Government has not referred a question to the effect as to whether agreement between the University and the Contractor is sham and bogus , which would have led this Tribunal to adjudicate the gravamen of the case raised by the University . This Tribunal is bound by the terms of reference and cannot enlarge its scope . All these circumstances and vacuum of facts from the side of the claimant , besides case projected by the University make it clear that there was no privity ofcontract between the parties and award of contract for housekeeping services to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt . ) Ltd. could not raise an industrial dispute , terms of which are detailed in preceding sections . The appropriate Government was not competent to refer the dispute for adjudication . In view of these reasons an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government forpublication .

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Dated: 19.10.2011

24. The Provider has to ensure that the Temporaries deployed are not forming any Association/Forum in respect of IGNOU matter nor they should be allowed tojoin in any Association / forum of IGNOU .

5. When contract between the University and the Contractor expired on 31.10.2007 with efflux of time , contract to provide housekeeping services was given to Spick & SpanFacilities Management ( Pvt. ) Ltd. It led the claimant and others to resort to illegal demonstration in the University premises . A suit for injunction was filed before High Court of Delhi , wherein an interim order was granted in favour of the University and against the housekeeping staff. On 13.3.2009 suit was decreed in favour of the University . The University claims that neither employer and employee relationship exists between the parties nor there is an industrial dispute , which may give jurisdiction to this Tribunal to adjudicate it.

नई दिल्ली 2 नवम्बर , 2011

का०आ० 3417 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14 ) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार इन्दिरा गाँधी राष्ट्रीय मुक्त विश्वविद्यालय के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध 1 में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं० 1 , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 119/2011 ) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2-11-2011 ) को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं० एल०--42012/ 219/2010- आई० आर० ( डी ०यू० ) ]

जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव New Delhi . the 2nd November , 2011

S.O. 3417. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act . 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 119/ 2011) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. 1. Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Indira Gandhi National Open University and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

[No. L -42012/219/ 2010- IR (DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary 8734

[PART II-SEC . 3( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

ANNEXURE

BEFORE DR. R.K. YADAV, PRESIDING OFFICER, TRIBUNAL NO. 1 , KARKARDOOMA CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL COURT COMPLEX, DELHI

I.D. No. 119/2011

Sh . Sonu Kumar,

R/ o J - IInd 177 , Madangir , NewDelhi .

Workman

Versus

The Vice Chancellor,

IGNOU , Maidan Gari , New Delhi .

the proceedings . Thereafter from last four dates none appeared for the claimant , not to talk of filing his claim statement .

4. The University was called upon to file its response to the reference order . The University filed its written statement , out of which it emerged that housekeeping services were outsourced on the strength of agreement dated 1.1.2004 entered into between the University and the Contractor. It has been pleaded that the claimant was an employee of the contractor and not of the University. Relevant clauses of the agreement are reproduced in the written statement , which are extracted thus :

Management

AWARD

"Whether the action of the management of IGNOU interminating the services of their workman Shri Sonu Kumar S / o Shri Kalicharan w.e.f. 03/10/2007 is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to and from which date ? "

2. In the order of reference , the appropriate Government directed the Claimant to file his claim statement within 15 days from the receipt of the reference order . .Despite the directions , so made , no claim statement was filed.

3.Notice by registered post was sent to the claimant on 13.5.2011 to file his claim statement . In response to the notice , so sent , Shri V.K. Kaushik , authorised representative , appeared and sought adjournment. Five time adjournments were granted , but claim statement was not filed. After 2.8.2011 , Shri Kaushik opted to abandon "12. Provider shall continue to be responsible for the personnel employed by him , in respect of terms and conditions of their service , payments , attendance , medical care , other disciplinary matters etc.who shall remain fully under the administrative and financial control and supervision of the Provider , exceptthat the University shall be the sole Arbitrator in respect of nature of the duties to be entrusted to and the manner of permanence of their duties for the purpose of this Agreement .

23. There is no privity of contract by and between the Provider andthe University. The Temporary shall have no right to make any claim against the University directly or indirectly, monetary including wages or otherwise . The Temporary shall also have no claim against the University of any dues, statutory or otherwise. Similarly, even there presentatives of any Temporary. Who have worked in the University shall have no right or claim against the University.

24. The Provider has to ensure that the Temporaries deployed are not forming any Association/Forum in respect of IGNOU matter not they should be allowed tojoin in any Association/forum of IGNOU .

25.The Provider has to ensure timely deployment of Temporaries as required by IGNOU and fulfil other obligation stated in the above said terms and conditions failing which penalty will be imposed by the University on case to cases basis from time to time. The decision of the University will be final" .

5. When contract between the University and the Contractor expired on 31.10.2007 with efflux oftime, contract [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

to provide housekeeping services was given to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt . ) Ltd. It led the claimant and others to resort to illegal demonstration in the University premises . A suit for injunction was filed before High Court of Delhi , wherein an interim order granted in favour of the University and against the housekeeping staff. On 13.3.2009 suit was decreed in favour of the University . The University claims that neither employer and employee relationship exists between the parties nor there is an industrial dispute , which may give jurisdiction to this Tribunal to adjudicate it .

6. As pointed above , claimant had opted not to file his claim statement . The University came with a plea that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor . His services came to an end when agreement between the University and the Contractor, to provide housekeeping services , came to an end on 31.10.2007 . Relevant clauses of the agreement are brought to the notice of the Tribunal with an intention to project that the claimant was an employee of the Contractor , who exercised financial , administrative as well as disciplinary control over him . On the face of these facts , the terms of reference are uncalled for . The appropriate Government has not referred a question to the effect as to whether agreement between the University and the Contractor is sham and bogus , which would have led this Tribunal to adjudicate the gravamen of the case raised by the University . This Tribunal is bound by the terms of reference and cannot enlarge its scope . All these circumstances and vacuum of facts from the side of the claimant , besides case projected by the University make it clear that there was no privity of contract between the parties and award of contract for housekeeping services to Spick & Span Facilities Management ( Pvt .) Ltd. could not raise an industrial dispute , terms of which are detailed in preceding sections . The appropriate Government was not competent to refer the dispute for adjudication . In view of these reasons an award is passed . It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication .

Dr. R.K. YADAV, Presiding Officer Dated: 19.10.2011

नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर, 2011

का० आ० 3418 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम , 1947 ( 1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार सी० बी० एस ०ई०, नई दिल्ली के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण नं II , दिल्ली के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 87/1996) को प्रकाशित करती है , जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2 11 2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[ सं० एल०-42011/8/94- आई ० आर० ( डी०यू० ) ]

जोहन तोपनो , अवर सचिव

8735

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 / अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 2nd November , 2011 S.O. 3418. in pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 87/1996) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court No. II , Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi and their workmen , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011 .

[No. L-42011 /8 / 94- IR(DU) ] JOHAN TOPNO , Under Secretary

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI SATNAM SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM - LABOUR COURT- IL, KARKARDOOMA, DELHL

ID No. 87/1996

Dated: 10.10.2011

C.B.S.E. ( Staff Union) Registered

In the matter of dispute between: President, X-52, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110008

Workman

Versus

Chairman, C.B.S.E. ,

2, Community Centre , Preet Vihar , Delhi - 110092 .

Management

AWARD

The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide its Order No. L - 42011 / 8 /94 - I.R . (D.U. ) dated 30.8.96/ 11.9.96 has referred the following industrial dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-

"Whether the Central Board of Secondary Education , New Delhi is to be treated as an Industry under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act? and if so , "Whether the Secretary , Central Board of Secondary Education New Delhi was justified in not framing transfer policy, withdrawing facility ofHRA @ 30% arbitrarily, non payment of overtime as per Delhi Shop Commercial Estts . Act and illegal dismissal of Shri Manohar Arora . If not , to what relief, the concerned workmen is entitled ?"

2. Briefly , the relevant facts as disclosed in the statement of claim are that CBSE Staff Union ( Registered) through its President Sh . Manohar Arora and the employees ofCBSE have been raising grievances , difficulties and lawful 8736

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933

[ PART II-SFC . 3 ( ii) ] demands before the management of the CBSE from time to time but the management of the board did not accede to their demands . The main demands of the employees ofthe CBSE are regarding payment of arrears ofbalance HRA i.e. 15%-(30%-15 %) from 1.1.86 till 1994 which was reduced illegally from 30% to 15% and for enhancement of the conveyance allowance to Rs . 450/- per month from Rs . 150/ per month since the year 1994. They also prayed for reinstatement of the President of the CBSE staff union Mr. Manohar Arora .

3.Here, it is relevant to rote the development in this case as Mr. Manohar Arora the applicant/claimant who is pursuing this case made a statement on 02.05.2011 that he is no longer interested for decision of issue no . 3 as the same has become redundant which issue finds reference in the award dated 31.7.2007 passed by my learned predecessor. The said issue is as under:

"3. Whether the action of the secretary of the respondent is justified in not framing transfer policy, withdrawing facility of HRA 30 % arbitrarily, non payment of overtime as per the Delhi Shops and Commercial Establishment Act . "

him vide order dated 14.05.1987 . Thereafter Mr. Manohar Arora slept over the matter and initiated conciliation proceedings only in July, 1993 which resulted in the present reference dated 30.08.1996 . That it is settled law that such belated and stale matters should not be raised and should bedismissed . It is further submitted that the charges were levelled against Mr. Manohar Arora as mentioned in the charge sheet dated 12.03.1982 . Adepartmental enquiry was held and the charges were proved in the departmental enquiry. That opportunities were given to Mr. Manohar Arora and ultimately the punishment of dismissal was awarded vide order dated 29.09.1986 . He preferred an appeal dated 07.11.1986 which as pointed out above was dismissed. it is asserted that the order or punishment of dismissal from service is legal and valid. The punishment was for proved misconducts and not for trade union activities as has been alleged in the statement of claim. Thatthe enquiry held against Mr. Manohar Arora is legal, valid and in accordance with the rules and regulations and also in compliance of the principles of natural justice. It is also submitted by the managernent of CBSE that if for any reason the enquiry conducted against Mr. Manohar Arora is held to be vitiated for whatsoever reason then the management should be given an opportunity to lead evidence before this Tribunal under Section 11 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947. The management , therefore . has prayed for the dismissal of the claim made by Mr. Manohar Arora in this case regarding his reinstatement and back wages etc.

4. Mr. Manohar Arora , in other words has stated that he has no grouse regarding the transfer policy, withdrawal ofthe facility of HRA 30 % arbitrarily and non payment of over time as per the Delhi Shops and Commercial Establishment Act. He has further stated that he is now concerned only concerning him i. e. regarding his dismissal from service. Thus the only relevant issue which remains to be decided in this case in regarding the dismissal of the applicant/claimant Mr. Manohar Arora who was the President ofthe CBSE staff union .

7. The workman filed a rejoinder and controverted the submissions of the management and reiterated his own case. Mr. Manohar Arora in the rejoinder however has admitted that order dated 29.09.1986 was passed. According to him it is also true that he preferred an appeal dated 07.11.1986 . However, according to him it is not correct to say that the appeal was rejected as according to him the rejection order was not communicated to him .

5. As regards the case of dismissal of Mr. Manohar Arora it is submitted in the statement of claim that the management of CBSE in order to curb and stop the trade union activities , illegally and arbitrarily dismissed the President of the CBSE staff union , Mr. Manohar Arora . The Union has been fighting for reinstatement of its President and they have raised the demand and at times did demonstrate and Dharnas but the management has refused to accede to this demand. That the illegal and arbitrary dismissal of Mr. Manohar Arora is liable to be set aside and he is entitled to be reinstated in service with all the benefits.

8. In support of his case the applicant/ claimant Mr. Manohar Arora filed his evidence by way of affidavit and he was subjected to cross - examination by the AR for the management and the workman closed his evidence on 04.12.2008 . Thereafter the case was fixed for recording of management evidence . The management however failedto adduce any evidence in this case and they even stopped attending the court and on 21.12.2010 the management was ordered to be proceeded exparte .

9. I have heard the workman in person and have also gone through the entire record .

6. The management has contested the claim of the applicant/claimant Mr. Manohar Arora, President CBSE staff union . It is submitted by the management that the reference with regard to Mr. Manohar Arora is hit by latches and delay. Mr. Manohar Arora was dismissed from service for proved misconduct vide order dated 29.09.1986 . Не preferred an appeal dated 07.11.1986 bu : the sare was rejected by the Appellate Authority. The rejection of the appeal by the Appellate Authority was communicatedto

10. Mr. Manohar Arora in his cross - examination has admitted that he was charge sheeted . He has also admitted it as correct that the enquiry was held against him . He has further admitted it as correct that as per the enquiry officer report charges were proved against him. He , however, volunteered to add that the enquiry was exparte . It may be [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

noted here that in his statement of claim Mr. Manohar Arora nowhere complained against the enquiry officer whether the same was exparte or not . Mr. Manohar Arora has also admitted in cross examination that he participated in the enquiryproceedings held on 4.7.1985 , 18.7.1985 , 12.8.1985 , 16.8.1985 , 18.9.1985 and 14.10.1985 . He also admitted in cross - examination that he participated in the enquiry and he had also put signatures on the proceedings of enquiry on different dates . Mr. Manohar Arora has admitted it as correct that he was dismissed vide order dated 29.9.1986 for proved misconduct .

11. The above mentioned admissions made by Mr. Manohar Arora in his cross - examination clearly prove the case of the management that an enquiry was held against Mr. Manohar Arora on various charges and the charges were proved against him as per the report of the enquiry officer and thereafter the punishment of dismissal was inflicted upon him by the Appellate Authority . He even preferred an appeal against the order of the appointing authority and the said appeal was also rejected . Mr. Manohar Arora has not made any complaint in his statement of claim regarding the enquiry conducted against him or regarding the rejection of his appeal by the appellant authority . The main grievance of the applicant/ claimant Mr. Manohar Arora is that he was dismissed from service for trade union activities . The management has specifically denied that due to trade union activities he has been dismissed from service . According to them Mr. Manohar Arora has been dismissed from service after the charges were levelled against him in the charge sheet and the said charges were proved in the domestic enquiry and thereafter he was punished after following the due process of law .

12. The dismissal of Mr. Manohar Arora , president CBSE staff union thus cannot be termed as illegal . He , therefore , is not entitled to any relief in this case . The award is passed accordingly and the reference also stands answered accordingly.

Dated: 10.10.2011

SATNAM SINGH Presiding Officer नई दिल्ली, 2 नवम्बर , 2011

का०आ० 3419 औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में , केन्द्रीय सरकार भारत संचार निगम लि लखनऊ के प्रबंधतंत्र के संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच , अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधि किरण , लखनऊ के पंचाट ( संदर्भ संख्या 16/2005 ) को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 2 11 2011 को प्राप्त हुआ था ।

[सं० एल -40012/ 154/2004- आई० आर० ( डी०यू० ) ]

जोहन तोपनो, अवर सचिव

8737

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26 , 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

New Delhi , the 2nd November , 2011

S.O. 3419.- In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) , the Central Government hereby publishes the award ( Ref. No. 16/2005) ofthe Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court , Lucknow as shown in the Annexure , in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited , Lucknow and their workman , which was received by the Central Government on 02.11.2011.

[No. L-40012/ 154/ 2004- IR (DU) ] Johan Topno , Under Secretary.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT , LUCKNOW

PRESENT

Dr. MANJU NIGAM Presiding Officer

I.D. No. 16/2005

Ref.No. L - 40012 / 154 / 2004 - IR (DU) dated : 23.03.2005

BETWEEN

Shri Girish Tiwari S / o Shri Ram Sunder Tewari R/ o 104/7 , Sabdal Bag , Lal Kuan Lucknow

AND

Principal General Manager Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Door Sanchar Lucknow

AWARD

1. By order No. L- 40012/ 154/ 2004 - IR ( DU ) dated: 23.03.2005 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section ( 1 ) and sub section ( 2A ) of section 10 of theIndustrial Disputes Act , 1947 ( 14 of 1947 ) referred this industrial dispute between Shri Girish Tiwari S / o Shri Ram Sunder Tewari , R/ o 104/7 , Sabdal Bag , Lal Kuan , Lucknow and the Principal General Manager , Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. , Door Sanchar . Lucknow for adjudication .

2. The reference under adjudication is

"WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD . , LUCKNOW IN TERMINATING THE SERVICES FROM 20.11.2002 OF SHRI GIRISH TEWARI SO SHRI RAM SUNDER TEWARI . INSTEAD OF REGULARIZING HIM IN SERVICE IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED ? IF NOT . TO WHAT RELIEF THE WORKMAN IS ENTITLED? " 8738

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26 , 2011 / AGRAHAYANA 5 , 1933 [PART II-SEC . 3 ( ii )]

department for a specified period from October, 1993 to May, 1995 i.e. in October , 1993 for30 days , in May, 1994 for 11 days , in October, 1994 for 30 days and in May, 1995 for 30 days , November, 1995 for 27 days and in January, 1996 for 25 days therefore , there was no question of completing 240 days' regular service in any calendar year. He has also contended that the documents filed by the workman are absolutely false and fabricated.

3. The case of the workman , Girish Tiwari in brief is that he was allowed to work in the BSNL by the SDE on daily wages @ Rs . 59/ - per day w.e.f. October , 1993 at Kaiserbagh Exchange , Lucknow and he continued to work upto 20th November, 2002 in different telephone exchanges , when he was not allowed to work i.e. his services have beenterminated by the SDO , Patel Nagar, Lucknow. It has been submitted by the workman that he worked for 240 days in a year and when he was working in Bhooth Nath Exchange he was getting Rs . 1500/- per month and said payment was made on ACG - 17 vouchers . It has been alleged by the workman that the management of BSNL did not heed to his representations and accordingly has prayed that action ofthe management dated 20.11.2002, terminating his services be declared illegal and unjustified and he be reinstated with consequential benefits including back wages.

9. The workman , Girish Tiwari has examined himself as witness in support of this claim and has stated that the worked continuously from October, 1993 to February, 1996 inKaiserbagh Exchange . He further stated that he worked inBhootnath Exchange since March , 1996 and thereafter worked in different telephone exchanges and lastly worked on 20.11.2002 at Patel Nagar Exchange when his services were terminated . He further stated that he worked for 240 days continuously in a calander year and that he was paid onACG- 1 by Shri G.L. Maurya, JTO . In cross - examination, he has stated that in starting he was paid @ Rs . 1800/- and later he was paid @ Rs . 1500/ - per month . He further stated that on AC- 17 he was paid @ Rs . 1800/- , which he received after putting his signatures on it . In support of his statement he had produced photocopy of following documents:

(i) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AE dated 01.10.93 , paper No. C - 12 .

( ii) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma, AE dated 05.01.94 , paper No. C-13 .

(iv) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AE dated 05.09.94 , paper No. C- 15 .

4. The management of the BSNL has disputed the claim ofthe workman by filing its written statement ; wherein ithas specifically submitted that the workman was engaged, intermittently , as casual labour in the installation work Kaiserbagh Exchange , Lucknow during period October , 1993 to January, 1996 and has denied the submission ofthe workman that he had been engaged at various telepnone exchanges. It has further submitted that the workman never worked continuously and regularly for 240 days in a calendar year as his services were hired from the local marked whenever required and on completion of work he was discharged . The management has also denied of making any payment to the workman on CG - 17 voucher andaccordingly, has prayed that the claim of the workman be rejected being devoid ofmerit .

(v) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AE dated 20.12.94, paper No. C - 16 .

5. The workman has filed rejoinder whereby it has only reiterated his averments in the statement of claim and has not introduced any new fact.

(vi) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma, AE dated 02.06.95, paper No. C- 17.

(vii) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AÈ dated 17.07.95, paper No. C- 18.

(viii) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma, AE dated 04.10.95, paper No. C- 19 .

(ix) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AE dated 01.10.95, paper No. C-20.

(x) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma, AE dated 01.01.96, paper No. C-21 .

6. The workman has filed photocopies of certain documents , less any appointment order, with his statement of claim, in support of his case whereas the management has not filed any documents with written statement, although it has disputed the authenticity of the documents filed by the workman . The workman has examined itself and another witness viz . Shri Magan Bihari Verma in support of his averments made in the statement of claim. The management on the other hand filed affidavit of Shri J.L. Maurya , SDO in support of their case . The parties cross - examined the witnesses of each other. The parties putup oral submissions in support of their rival case .

(xi) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma, AE dated 31.01.96, paper No. C- 22 .

7. Heard representative of the parties and perused evidence on record .

(xii) Imprest Bill issued by Shri M.B. Verma , AE dated 29.03.96, paper No. C-23.

( xiii ) ACG - 17 dated 03.02.97, paper No. C -24 .

(xiv ) Receipt dated 09.08.97 , paper No. C-25 .

8. The learned representative on behalf of the management has contended that the workman was engaged 'intermittently' as daily wages casual labourer in the [ भाग II- खण्ड 3 ( ii ) ]

भारत का राजपत्र नवम्बर 26, 2011 /अग्रहायण 5 , 1933

8739

preceding 12 months from the date of his alleged disengagement .

The WW - 2 , Shri Magan Bihari Verma , SDE ( Retd . ) , stated that the workman worked as casual labour with him 'intermittently' in installation work of Kaiser Bagh Exchange during 1993 to 1996. He further stated that paper No. C - 12 to C-23 is Imprest Bill , which includes particulars regarding payments made to the workman . In cross - examination he stated that he was AE ( Installation ) from 1993 to November , 1996 and the workman was called for work as per need . He further stated that the workman was not issued any appointment letter and the workman did not work for 240 days in any calender year .

10. In rebuttal , the opposite party has examined Shri J.L. Maurya , SDO who has stated that on verification from record ; it appears that the workman worked for 30 days in October , 1993 , 11 days in May, 1994 , 30 days in October, 1994, 30 days in May, 1995, 27 days in November , 1995, 25 days in January , 1996. He also stated that he was engaged from local market for short duration and after the work is over his services were discharged . He denied of 240 days continuous working in respect of workman or his working with him at Bhoot Nath Exchange , Lucknow. He also disputed the genuineness of the ACG - 17 vouchers , filed by the workman . In cross - examination , he stated that the SDE has no power to continue any labour for more than two months ; rather he can do so by taking approval of the competent authority. He denied continuous engagement of workman due to installation work .

14. It was the case of the workman that he worked since october , 1993 to 20.11.2002 continuously ; and as such , he worked for 240 days in each calendar year . The documents filed by him were disputed by the management and also the management was ordered to file original documents pertaining to the workman ; but the workman did not complied with the direction . Instead it filed an affidavit to the effect that it does not have any document relating to the workman . The management on one hand admitted that the services of the workman were availed 'intermittently' as per need during period October, 1993 to January , 1996 ; and he was paid accordingly, it was incumbent upon the management to produce the documents relating to his engagement and payment for the period he was engaged . Being an government undertaking was the responsibility of the management to maintain records relating to engagement of casual labour and payment thereof, as such , the management cannot shake its hands off by filing an affidavit that it does not have any. Thus , an adverse inference could easilybe drawn against the management and in absence of any document from the management regarding engagement or payment to the workman , which could be the best evidence , the photocopy of the documents , filed by the workman would be considered as ' secondary evidence' ; but the workman has filed photocopy of the documents pertaining to the period 1993 to 1996; whereas he has come forward with a case that his services were terminated by the management w.e.f. 20.11.2002 and also the reference order has been issued to effect . Accordingly, as per prevailing law, this Tribunal has to see as to whether the workman worked for 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his alleged termination i.e. during period 19.11.2001 to 20.11.2002 , and the alleged unjust or illegal order of termination was passed by the management .

11. In the light of the aforesaid rival statements of both the sides I have scanned the documents produced by the workman . Paper No. C - 12 to C - 23 is photocopy of Imprest Bill in respect of M.B. Verma; wherein the name of workmanfinds reference at paper No. C - 12 to C - 15 , C - 17 to C -22. Paper No. C - 24 is photocopy of ACG - 17 voucher by which payment is purported to be received by the workman.. Paper No. C - 25 is photocoy of gate pass , issued to the workman . The originals of the same were summoned by the workman on which the management filed an affidavit , paper No. A - 35 , stating therein that the alleged documents are not available at any segment or section of the department .

12. The management has disputed the genuineness of the above documents and the management witness Shri J.L. Maurya has alleged that above documents are not genuine . There is no cross - examination on this point from the workman side .

15.Admittedly no appointment letter was issued and no post was ever advertised for the appointment . There is no evidence of the workman that SDE was competent to engage daily wager . He has not produced any voucher or attendance register or any other documentary evidence to prove this fact that Rs . 59/ - per day or later on Rs . 1500/ - per month was paid to him as salary for the period mentioned in his statement . Moreover the documents filed by the workman in support of his claim does not pertainto the relevant period as they are for the period 1993 to 1996; whereas the workman has to substantiate that he worked for 240 days in the preceding year from the date of his alleged termination i.e. during period 19.11.2001 to 20.11.2002.

13. Moreover , from the perusal of aforesaid documents it is not evident that the workman had worked from October , 1993 to 20.11.2002 as pleaded by him in his statement of claim . The documents produced by him , if they are taken to be genuine pertain to the year 1993 to 1996 and that too intermittently. Other document are also not relevant to prove this fact that the workman had actually worked as casual labour for more than 240 days in the

16. It is well settled that if a party challenges the legality of order the burden lies upon him to prove illegality of the order and if no evidence is produced the party 8740

[PART II-SEC . 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 26, 2011 /AGRAHAYANA 5, 1933

invoking jurisdiction of the court must fail . In the present caseburdenwas on the workman to set out the grounds to challenge the validity of the termination order and to prove the termination order was illegal . It was the case of the workman that he had worked for more than 240 days in the year concerned. This claim has been denied by the management ; therefore , it was for the workman to lead evidence to show that she had in fact worked up to 240 days inthe year preceding his alleged termination. In (2002) 3 SCC 25 Range Forest Officer vs S.T. Hadimani Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:

"Itwas the case of the claimant that he had so worked but this claim was denied by the appellant. It was then for the claimant to lead evidence to show that he had in fact worked for 240 days in the year preceding his termination. Filing of an affidavit is only his own statement in his favour and that can not be regarded as sufficient evidence for any court or tribunal to come to the conclusion that a workman had, in fact, worked for 240 days or order or record ofappointment or engagement for that period was produced by the workman . On this ground alone , theaward is liable to be set aside ."

17. Analyzing its earlier decisions on the aforesaid point Hon'bleApex Court has observed in 2006 ( 108 ) FLR R.M. Yellatti & Asstt. Executive Engineer as follow:

" It is clear that the provisions of the evidence Act in terms donot apply to the proceedings under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act . However, applying general principles and on reading the aforestated judgements we find that this Court has repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked 240 days in a given year. This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping in the witness box. This burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent evidence , both oral and documentary. In cases of termination of services of daily wages earner, there willbe no letter of appointment or termination . There will also be no receipt or proof of payment . Thus , in most cases , the workman (claimant) can only call upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter ofappointment or termination , if any, the wage register, the attendance register etc. Drawing of adverse inference ultimately would depend thereafter on facts ofeach case. The above decisions however make it clear that mere affidavits or self serving statements made by the claimant/workman will no suffice in the matter ofdischarge of the burden placed by law on theworkman to prove that he had worked for 240 days in a given year. The above judgments further laydown that mere non production ofmuster rolls per se without any plea of suppression by the claimant workman will not be the ground for the tribunal to draw an adverse inference against the management. "

18. In the present case the workman has stated that he has worked continuously for 240 days . The photocopy ofImprest Bills produced by him as well as photocopies of the documents are not pertaining to the fact that the workman had worked for more than 240 days in the preceding year i.e. from 19.11.2001 to 20.11.2002, from the date ofhis alleged termination and the documents filed by theworkman are pertaining to the year 1993 to 1996. Mere pleadings are no substitute for proof. Initial burden of establishing the fact of continuous work for 240 days in a year was on the workman but he has failed to discharge the above burden . There is no reliable material for recording findings that the workman had worked more than 240 days inthe preceding year from the date of his alleged termination i.e. 20.11.2002, and the alleged unjust or illegal order of termination was passed by the management .

19.Accordingly, the reference is adjudicated against the workman Girish Tiwari and he is not entitled to any relief.

20. Award as above . Lucknow: 14.10.2011

DR. MANJU NIGAM , PresidingOfficer .

Printed by the Manager , Government of India Press , Ring Road , Mayapuri , New Delhi - 110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications , Delhi - 110054 .