प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 20] नई दिल्ली, अगस्त 31—सितम्बर 6, 2014, शनिवार/भाद्र 9—भाद्र 15, 1936
No. 20] NEW DELHI, AUGUST 31—SEPTEMBER 6, 2014, SATURDAY/BHADRA 9—BHADRA 15, 1936
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके ।
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation.
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (iii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)
केन्द्रीय अध्किारियों ;संघ राज्य क्षेत्रा प्रशासनों को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Orders and Notifications Issued by Central Authorities (other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
भारत निर्वाचन आयोग
नई दिल्ली, 27 अगस्त, 2014
आ.अ. 27.—लोक प्रतिनिध्त्वि अध्निियम, 1951 ;1951 का 43द्ध की धरा 106क के अनुसरण में भारत निर्वाचन आयोग, 7-बीदर संसदीय निर्वाचन क्षेत्रा तथा अन्यों से लोक सभा सदस्य श्री ध्र्म सिंह के निर्वाचन को चुनौती देते हुए श्री गुरफपद््दप्पा नागामारपल्ली द्वारा दायर की गई, कर्नाटक उच्च न्यायालय की निर्वाचन याचिका सं. 2009 का सं. 21 में दिनांक 18 जून, 2014 के आदेश को एतद््द्वारा प्रकाशित करता है।
;आदेश अंग्रेजी भाग में छपा है।द्ध
[संं. 82/कर्ना.-लोकसभा/;21/2009द्ध/2014] आदेश से, तपस कुमार, प्रधन सचिव New Delhi, the 27th August, 2014
O.N. 27.—In pursuance of Section 106a of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission of India hereby publishes the order dated 18th June, 2014 of the High Court of Karnataka in Election Petition No. 21 of 2009 filed by Shri Gurupadappa Nagamarpalli challenging the election of Sh. Daram Singh, a member of the Lok Sabha from 7-Bidar Parliamentary Constituency.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014
BEFORE:
118 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 6, 2014/BHADRA 15, 1936 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)] (d) Declare that the election of the respondent is Between: void u/Section 100(1) (d) (iv) of the R.P. Act.Gurupadappa Nagamarpalli, S/o. Sanganabasappa Nagmarpalli, Aged 67 years, R/o. Nagmarpalli, Tuluk: Aurad [B], District : Bidar. ....PETITIONER/S
[By Sri. Hemanth Kumar D, Adv. for M/s. Pramila Assocs., Advs.]
and:
(e) Declare that the use of EVMs by the Election Commission for the election to the 7- Bidar Parliamentary Constituency ultra vires the Constitution, the R.P. Act and conduct of Election Rules.
(f) Award costs of the petition.
(g) Grant such other relief or consequential reliefs as this Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
This EP coming on for Hearing on I.A., this day the
Court made the following:
ORDER
Dharam Singh, S/o. Narayan Singh, Aged about 70 years, R/o. N.V. Layout, S.B. Temple Road, Gulbarga. ....RESPONDENT/S
[By Sri. H.D. Amarnathan & Sri. B.M. Arun, Advs.]
This EP is filed u/Section 81 of the Representation
of People's Act, 1951 praying to:
(a) Declare that the declaration of the result of respondent to the 7- Bidar Parliamentary Constituency is null and void.
(b) Declare that the respondent has committed the Corrupt practices u/Section 123(1), (6) and (7) r/w. Section 100(1) (b) of the R.P. Act.
(c) Name respondent as having committed corrupt practices u/Section 98 of the Representation of People Act and such other persons who have committed the corrupt practice.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo and submits that the election petition has become infructuous as the election period is elapsed and the respondent has contested and defeated in the recent election. Therefore, he has sought for dismissal of the election petition as infructuous.
In view of the memo filed and the submission made,
the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
The security deposit of Rs. 2,000-00 shall be refunded
to the petitioner.
In view of dismissal of the election petition as infructuous, Misc. Cvl. No. 21107/10 for rejection of election petition and Misc. Cvl. No. 21105/10 for striking down the pleadings do not survive for consideration and hence they are rejected.
[No. 82/KT-HP/(21/2009)/2014] By Order, TAPAS KUMAR, Principal Secy.