रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 35] नई दिल्ली, अगस्त 27—सितम्बर 2, 2017, शनिवार/भाद्र 5—भाद्र 11, 1939
No. 35] NEW DELHI, AUGUST 27—SEPTEMBER 2, 2017, SATURDAY/ BHADRA 5—BHADRA 11, 1939
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड ;iiद्ध
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्राालय
;कार्मिक और प्रशिक्षण विभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2009.—केंद्रीय सरकार एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विषेश पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 (1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए बिहार राज्य सरकार, गृह विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्याः 8/सी.बी.आई. 80-05/2017-गृ.आ.-6715/पटना, दिनांक 18 अगस्त, 2017 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमति से भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-494/17, दिनांक 07/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-499/17, दिनांक 07/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-500/17, दिनांक 08/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-505/17, दिनांक 10/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (आदमपुर) थाना कांड संख्या-508/17, दिनांक 11/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-512/17, दिनांक 12/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-513/17, दिनांक 12/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-514/17, दिनांक 12/08/2017, भागलपुर कोतवाली (तिलकामांझी) थाना कांड संख्या-517/17, दिनांक 13/08/2017, सभी धारा 409/420/467/468/471/ 120 बी/34 भा. द. वि. एंव सहरसा जिला अंतर्गत सदर थाना कांड संख्या-850/17, दिनांक 17/08/2017 धारा 406/409/ 420/468/471/120 बी. भा. द. वि. जो भागलपुर एंव सहरसा में सरकारी बैंक खातों से जालसाजी एवं शडयंत्रपूर्ण तरीके से सरकारी राषि के अवैध हस्तांरण एवं दुरुपयोग से संबंधित हैं, के अनुसंधान/पर्यवेक्षण एवं अन्य अपेक्षित कार्रवाई करने कि लिए दिल्ली विषेश पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की षक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का समस्त बिहार राज्य में विस्तार करती हैं।
[पफा. सं. 228/41/2017-ए.वी.डी.-II]
एस. पी. आर. त्रिापाठी, अवर सचिव
5110 GI/2017
(5381)5382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 21st August, 2017
S.O. 2009.— In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section(1) of section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Bihar, Home Department, vide Notification No. 8/C.B.I.-80-05/2017 HP-6715/Patna 18th August 2017, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, to the whole of the State of Bihar for investigation / supervision and inquire into the Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 494/2017 dated 07.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 499/2017 dated 07.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 500/2017 dated 08.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 505/2017 dated 10.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Adampur) PS Case No. 508/2017 dated 11.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 512/2017 dated 12.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 513/2017 dated 12.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 514/2017 dated 12.08.2017, Bhagalpur Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No. 517/2017 dated 13.08.2017 all u/s 409/420/467/468/471/120B/34 I.P.C. and Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 850/17 dated 17.08.2017 u/s 406/409/419/420/467/468/471/120B I.P.C. which are related to illegal transfer and misuse of funds from Government Bank Accounts in Bhagalpur and Saharsa in fraudulent and conspiratorial manner.
[F. No. 228/41/2017-AVD-II]
S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2010.—केंद्र सरकार, एतद्द्वारा दिल्ली विषेश पुलिस स्थापना अधिनियम, 1946 (1946 का अधिनियम सं. 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उप धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त षक्तियों प्रयोग करते हुए राजस्थान सरकार, गृह (समूह-अ) विभाग, जयपुर की अधिसूचना सं. एफ. 19(40) गृह-5/2017 दिनांक 20.08.2017 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमति से भारतीय सेना द्वारा उपयोग में लायी जा रही महाजन फील्ड फायरिंग रेंज हेतु भूमि अधिग्रहण के एवज में धोखाधड़ी एवं जाली दावों/आवंटन से संबंधित गजनेर, पुलिस स्टेषन, जिला बीकानेर में दिनांक 26.08.2014 को पंजीकृत एफआईआर सं. 103/14, 104/14, 105/14, 106/14, 107/14, 108/14, 109/14, 110/14, 111/14, 112/14, 113/14, 114/14 और 115/14 एवं दिनांक 05.09.2014 को पंजीकृत एफआईआर सं. 124/14, 125/14 और 126/14 तथा कोलायत पुलिस स्टेषन, जिला बीकानेर, राजस्थान में दिनांक 26.08.2014 को पंजीकृत एफआईआर सं. 144/14 और 145/14 की जांच करने एवं उपर्युक्त एफआईआर में वर्णित अपराधों में किये गये प्रयासों, दुश्प्रेरणाओं और शड़यन्त्रों तथा उसी संव्यवहार में किये गये या उन्हीं तथ्यों से उत्पन्न प्रासंगिक अन्य अपराधों की जांच करने के लिए दिल्ली विषेश पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की षक्तियों और न्यायाधिकार- क्षेत्र का विस्तार सम्पूर्ण राजस्थान राज्य में करती है।
[पफा. सं. 228/39/2017-ए.वी.डी.-II]
एस. पी. आर. त्रिापाठी, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2010.—In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the State Government of Rajasthan, Home (Gr.-V) Department, Jaipur issued vide Notification No F.(40) Home-5/2017 dated 20.08.2017 hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole of the State of Rajasthan for investigation of FIRs No. 103/14, 104/14, 105/14, 106/14, 107/14, 108/14, 109/14, 110/14, 111/14, 112/14, 113/14, 114/14 and 115/14 all dated 26.08.2014 and FIRs No. 124/14, 125/14 and 126/14 all dated 05.09.2014 lodged at Police Station-Gajner, District Bikaner and FIR Nos. 144/14 and 145/14 both dated 26.08.2014 lodged at Police Station Kalayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan, relating to fraudulent and fictitious claims/ allotment in lieu of land acquired for Mahajan Field Firing Range which is used by the Indian Army and attempts, abetments and conspirancy in relation to or in connection with the said offences mentioned in the above FIRs and any other offences committed in the course of the same transation arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/39/2017-AVD-II]
S. P. R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5383विदेश मंत्राालय
;सी.पी.वी. प्रभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 9 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2011.—राजनयिक और कोंसुलीय अध्किारी ;शपथ एवं पफीसद्ध के अध्निियम, 1948 ;1948 का 41द्ध की धरा 2 के ख्ांड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में वैधानिक आदेश ।
एतद्द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारत के प्रधन कोंसलावास, टोरोंटो में श्रीमति रजनी कपूर, सहायक अनुभाग अध्किारी को दिनांक 9 अगस्त, 2017 से सहायक कोंसुलर अध्किारी के तौर पर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के निर्वहन के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/2016]
प्रकाश चन्द, निदेशक ;कोंसुलरद्ध
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 9th August, 2017
S.O. 2011.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Ms. Rajni Kapoor, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officers in Consulate General of India, Toronto to perform the Consular services with effect from 9th August, 2017.
[No. T-4330/01/2016]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2012.—राजनयिक और कोंसुलीय अध्किारी ;शपथ एवं पफीसद्ध के अध्निियम, 1948 ;1948 का 41द्ध की धरा 2 के ख्ांड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में वैधानिक आदेश ।
एतद्द्वारा, केंद्र सरकार भारत के दूतावास, उलनबटोर में श्री रत्न चन्द, सहायक अनुभाग अध्किारी को दिनांक 23 अगस्त, 2017 से सहायक कोंसुलर अध्किारी के तौर पर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के निर्वहन के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/2017]
प्रकाश चन्द, निदेशक ;कोंसुलरद्ध
New Delhi, the 23rd August, 2017
S.O. 2012.—Statutory Order in pursuance of clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Rattan Chand, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Ulaanbaatar to perform the Consular services with effect from 23rd August, 2017.
[No. T-4330/01/2017]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)5384 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
वस्त्रा मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 11 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2013.—केन्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में वस्त्रा मंत्राालय के अंतर्गत आने वाले निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को जिसके 80% से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, अध्सिूचित करती है :-
1. हस्तशिल्प विपणन एवं विस्तार केंद्र, विकास आयुक्त का कार्यालय ;शिल्पहस्तद्ध, 147, माहेश्वरी अपार्टमेंट, मांजी का हत्था, पावटा बी रोड, जोध्पुर ;राजस्थानद्ध
2. हस्तशिल्प विपणन एवं विस्तार केंद्र, विकास आयुक्त का कार्यालय ;शिल्पहस्तद्ध, बीएसएपफ हाई स्कूल के सामने, अखनूर रोड, मुट्ठी, जम्मू-181205 ;जम्मू एवं कश्मीरद्ध,
3. हस्तशिल्प विपणन एवं विस्तार केंद्र, विकास आयुक्त का कार्यालय ;शिल्पहस्तद्ध, 1259-60, विनोबा रोड, शिवरामपेट, मैसूर-570001 ;कर्नाटकद्ध
4. हस्तशिल्प विपणन एवं विस्तार केंद्र, विकास आयुक्त का कार्यालय ;शिल्पहस्तद्ध, सीओजी कॉम्पलेक्स, ब्लॉक-सी, पहली मंजिल, सेमिनारी हिल्स, नागपुर-440006 ;महाराष्ट्रद्ध
[सं. ई-11016/1/2015-हिंदी]
पुनीत अग्रवाल, संयुक्त सचिव
MINISTRY OF TEXTILES
New Delhi, the 11th August, 2017
S.O. 2013.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use of Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Textiles, more than 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi :
1. Handicraft Marketing and Service Extention Centre, O/o the Development Commissioner (Handicraft), 147, Maheshwari Apartments, Manji ka Hatha, Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).
2. Handicraft Marketing and Service Extention Centre, O/o the Development Commissioner (Handicraft), Opposite BSF School, Akhnoor Road, Mutthi, Jammu-181205 (Jammu & Kashmir).
3. Handicraft Marketing and Service Extention Centre, O/o the Development Commissioner (Handicraft), 1259-60, Vinoba Road, Shivrampet, Mysor-570001 (Karnataka).
4. Handicraft Marketing and Service Extention Centre, O/o the Development Commissioner (Handicraft), CGO Complex, Block-C, First Floor, Seminari Hills, Nagpur-440006 (Maharashtra).
[No. E-11016/1/2015-Hindi]
PUNEET AGARWAL, Jt. Secy.
इलेक्ट्रॉनिकी और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 21 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2014.—केन्द्र सरकार एतद्द्वारा राजभाषा ;संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोगद्ध नियम, 1976 के नियम 10 के उप नियम ;4द्ध के अनुसरण में इलेक्ट्रॉनिकी और सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी मंत्राालय के सम्ब( कार्यालय राष्ट्रीय सूचना विज्ञान केंंद्र के इंदौर ;म.प्र.द्ध स्थित जिला केंद्र, जिसके 80% से अध्कि कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाध्क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को अध्सिूचित करती है ।
[सं. 7;2द्ध/2005-हि.अ.]
राजीव कुमार, संयुक्त सचिव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5385
MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
New Delhi, the 21st August, 2017
S.O. 2014.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use of Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the District Centre of National Informatics Centre, Indore (M.P.) an attached office of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, located at Indore (M.P.), more than 80% staff whereof have acquired working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. 7(2)/2005-H.S.]
RAJEEV KUMAR, Jt. Secy.
उपभोक्ता मामलेउपभोक्ता मामलेउपभोक्ता मामलेउपभोक्ता मामले, , , , खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालयखाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालयखाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालयखाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग)
भारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरो
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 2015201520152015....————भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम 6 के उपिविनयम (3) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतद्द्वारा नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए उत्पादों की मुहरांकन शुल्क अिधसूिचत करता है :
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| भारतीय मानक संख् या | भाग | अनु. भाग | वर्ष | उत्पाद | इकाई | न् यूनतम मुहरांकन श ुल् क ( .) | इकाई दर स् लैब 1 (.) | स् लैब में इकाई यां | इकाई दर स् लैब 2 (.) | स् लैब 2 म ें इकाई यां | इकाई दर स् लैब 3 ( .) | स् लैब 3 म ें इकाई यां | प्रचालन ितिथ | |
| वृहद स् तर | एम एस एम इ क े िलए | |||||||||||||
| 745 | - | - | 2003 | व'ादि – हथकरघे की पलंग की सूती चादरें | 1 वर्ग मीटर | 56000 | 45000 | 0.15 | सभी | - | - | - | - | सक्षम प्राधिकारी क े अनुमोदन की तारीख |
[संदर्भ : सीएमडी -2/जी-18]
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2015.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (3) of regulation 6 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the Marking fee for the product given in the schedule:
5386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]SCHEDULE
| IS No. | Part | Sec | Year | Product | Units | Minimum Marking Fee (Rs.) | Unit Rate Slab-1 Fee (Rs.) | Units in Slab- 1 | Unit Rate Slab- 2 Fee (Rs.) | Units in Slab- 2 | Unit Rate Slab-3 Fee (Rs.) | Units in Slab | Effective Date -3 | |
| Large Scale | MSME | |||||||||||||
| 745 | - | - | 2003 | Textiles - Handloom Cotton Bed Sheets | 1 Sq. mtr | 56000 | 45000 | 0.15 | All | - | - | - | - | Date of approval of competent Authority |
[Ref : CMD-2/G-18]
C. B. SINGH, Addl. Director General
पेपेपेपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय ट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय ट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय ट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2016201620162016....————कें (ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पंजाब राज्य में गाँव झुिगयां, िजला : शहीद भगतसिंह नगर से हिमाचल प्रदेश के गाँव पेखुबेला, जिला : उना तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन आयल काप<रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पीएजेपील से उना ब्रांच पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए |
और, कें (ीय सरकार को यह प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने का प्रयोजन के लिए ऐसी भूिम िजसके भीतर पाइपलाइन िबछाए जनि का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अिधसूचना से उपाबA अनुसूची में वBर्णत है, के उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करना आवश्यक है |
अत: अब, कें (ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूमी में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Oए उस भूिम में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है |
कोई Rक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वBर्णत भूिम से हितबA है, उक्त अधिनियम की धरा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गयी अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियां साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दिये जाने की तारीख से इTीस दिनों के भीतर, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन या भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के संबंध में आक्षेप, लिखित रूप में Wीमती रंजीत कौर, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन आयल काप<रेशन लिमिटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पीएजेपील से उना ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना, 331-बी , सूर्या एन्क्लेव, जी टी रोड बायपास, जालंधर (पंजाब)- 144009 को कर सके गा |
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| राज्य : पंजाब | ||||||||
| ं . ं . ं . ं . सं.सं.सं.सं. | िजला | तहसील | गाँवगाँवगाँवगाँव का नाम का नाम | हदबस्त न ंनंनंनं | म म ु रब्बा ु किला तथा म म रब्बा // // // // किला तथा रब्बा ु रब्बा ु किला तथा किला तथा खसरा सं. | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
6 // 25/2 00 00 20 5 // 21 00 08 79 5 // 22 00 13 17 5 // 23 00 04 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5387 5 // 19/2 00 00 20 5 // 18/2 00 08 30
5 // 17/1 00 01 76
5 // 17/2 00 11 23
5 // 16 00 08 79
5 // 15 00 03 55
4 // 20 00 00 28
4 // 11 00 12 93
4 // 12 00 12 08
4 // 13 00 03 01
4 // 9/1 00 00 26
4 // 8 00 09 82
4 // 7 00 06 65
38 रास्ता 00 02 46
2 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर जुलाह माजरा 286 54 // 8 00 00 20
79/1 रास्ता 00 00 32
54 // 7 00 07 76
54 // 4 00 00 81
54 // 6 00 01 69
54 // 5/2 00 12 50
53 //1 00 00 83
3 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर खोजा 284 22 // 6 00 00 20
21 // 1 00 11 55
21 // 2 00 01 60
9 // 21 00 01 13
9 // 22 00 11 27
9 // 23 00 12 69
9 // 24 00 07 50
9 // 17 00 05 80
9 // 16 00 13 26
10 // 20 00 11 79
10 // 11 00 00 61
10 // 12 00 10 33
10 // 19 00 02 30
10 // 13 00 13 01
10 // 14 00 07 84
10 // 15 00 00 20
10 // 7 00 05 05
10 // 6 00 12 59
11 // 10 00 12 44
11 // 9 00 03 23
11 // 1 00 00 26
5388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11 // 2 00 09 88
11 // 3 00 12 46
11 // 4 00 09 31
11 // 5 00 00 20
7 // 24 00 03 91
7 // 25 00 13 31
6 // 21 00 11 13
6 // 22 00 00 79
6 // 20 00 01 70
6 // 19 00 11 60
6 // 18 00 12 86
6 // 17 00 06 48
6 // 14 00 06 35
6 // 15 00 12 99
5 // 11/1 00 08 72
5 // 11/2 00 00 64
5 // 11/3 00 02 53
98 रास्ता 00 00 82
5 // 28 00 01 64
5 // 12/1 00 02 08
5 // 12/2 00 00 98
5 // 9/2 00 08 58
62 00 01 55
5 // 8 00 09 64
5 // 7 00 12 28
5 // 6 00 11 14
4 // 10/2/1 00 05 80
4 // 10/2/2 00 03 89
4 // 10/1 00 02 71
4 // 9 00 06 63
4 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर ताजपुर 283 27 // 2 00 00 20
27 // 9 00 02 43
27 // 3 00 02 73
27 // 4 00 07 68
27 // 5 00 11 55
27 // 8 00 09 51
27 // 7 00 04 82
27 // 6 00 00 78
26 // 1 00 12 76
26 // 2/1 00 06 07
46 रास्ता 00 00 20
45 रास्ता 00 02 47
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5389
26 // 2/3 00 03 96
26 // 3 00 07 55
5 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर लालेवाल 282 6 // 3 00 04 53
6 // 4 00 12 31
6 // 5 00 07 27
1 // 25 00 06 01
2 // 21 00 08 86
6 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर बािजदपुर 217 63 // 21 00 00 85
132 रास्ता 00 02 16
63 // 22 00 10 28
63 // 23 00 12 07
63 // 24 00 12 23
63 // 25 00 10 22
63 // 16 00 01 80
63 // 17 00 00 20
62 // 20 00 06 99
62 // 21 00 04 66
62 // 22/1 00 00 41
62 // 19 00 12 25
62 // 18 00 12 04
62 // 17 00 12 28
62 // 16 00 09 79
61 // 20 00 12 11
61 // 11 00 00 23
61 // 12 00 04 30
61 // 19 00 07 34
61 // 18 00 01 29
61 // 13 00 10 95
61 // 14 00 12 34
61 // 15 00 11 93
60 // 11/1 00 02 51
60 // 11/2 00 09 15
60 // 12 00 11 99
484 रास्ता 00 00 20
60 // 8/1 00 00 20
60 // 8/2 00 04 29
60 // 13 00 07 53
60 // 7/2 00 10 90
60 // 14 00 02 02
7 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर गडी भारती 218 55 // 6 00 09 62
85 रास्ता 00 01 21
56 // 10 00 13 76
5390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर भारटा कलां 219 53 // 9 00 09 9853 // 8 00 12 19
53 // 7 00 12 09
53 // 4 00 00 20
53 // 5 00 02 02
53 // 6 00 10 30
52 // 1 00 06 84
52 // 10 00 05 29
52 // 2 00 11 40
52 // 9 00 00 53
52 // 3 00 12 14
52 // 4/2 00 12 23
52 // 5/1 00 05 73
52 // 5/2 00 03 41
52 // 5/3 00 03 16
51 // 1/1 00 01 41
51 // 1/2 00 09 00
51 // 2/1 00 09 81
51 // 2/2 00 02 32
51 // 3/1 00 11 95
51 // 4 00 08 00
51 // 5 00 01 12
46 // 23 00 00 39
46 // 24 00 06 06
46 // 25 00 11 51
47 // 21 00 11 40
रास्ता 00 01 06
47 // 22 00 12 37
47 // 23 00 11 73
47 // 18 00 00 20
47 // 17 00 03 90
47 // 24 00 08 52
47 // 25 00 02 12
47 // 16 00 10 27
48 // 20 00 11 91
48 // 19/2 00 11 82
48 // 18 00 11 39
9 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर दरीयापुर 278 15 // 18 00 00 68
15 // 17 00 11 27
15 // 14 00 01 17
15 // 15 00 07 20
15 // 16 00 05 60
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5391
14 // 20/2 00 00 51
14 // 11/1 00 03 50
33 रास्ता 00 01 48
14 // 11/2 00 06 93
14 // 20/1/1 00 00 20
14 // 12 00 12 59
14 // 26 00 00 95
14 // 13/1 00 01 10
14 // 13/2 00 10 71
14 // 14 00 12 14
14 // 15 00 12 05
13 // 11/1 00 03 85
13 // 10/2 00 00 20
43 रास्ता 00 07 12
13 // 10/1 00 00 20
13 // 11/2 00 05 86
13 // 12 00 05 59
13 // 13/1 00 00 68
13 // 9/1 00 03 78
13 // 8/1 00 09 50
13 // 7/1 00 12 47
13 // 6/1 00 12 46
12 // 26 00 03 35
12 // 10/1 00 08 90
12 // 9/1 00 12 88
12 // 8/1 00 10 63
12 // 3 00 01 60
12 // 4 00 07 66
12 // 5 00 04 26
12 // 6 00 00 22
12 // 7/1 00 04 99
10 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर काहलों 222 69 // 5 00 07 45
69 // 6 00 00 27
70 // 1/1 00 07 60
70 // 1/2 00 04 42
70 // 2 00 11 94
70 // 3 00 10 70
132 रास्ता 00 01 37
70 // 4 00 11 85
70 // 5 00 11 90
67 // 25 00 00 21
71 // 1 00 07 87
5392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
71 // 2 00 01 98
66 // 21 00 03 99
66 // 22 00 10 54
66 // 23/1 00 06 38
66 // 23/2 00 06 09
66 // 24 00 11 83
66 // 25 00 11 73
65 // 20 00 00 20
65 // 21 00 10 10
65 // 19 00 02 90
65 // 22 00 08 67
65 // 18 00 08 78
65 // 23 00 03 01
65 //24 00 00 20
65 // 17 00 12 14
65 // 16 00 11 50
124 रास्ता 00 01 51
64 // 20 00 10 74
64 // 19 00 12 13
64 // 18 00 11 75
64 // 13 00 00 20
64 // 14 00 03 28
64 // 17 00 08 77
64 // 15 00 02 07
64 // 16 00 01 27
11 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर उधोवाल 272 14 // 15/1 00 06 11
14 // 15/2 00 00 20
15 // 11 00 12 03
15 // 12 00 12 25
15 // 13 00 12 55
रास्ता 00 00 88
15 // 14 00 11 28
15 // 15 00 08 98
15 // 6 00 03 97
16 // 11 00 00 20
16 // 10/2 00 12 00
16 // 10/1 00 00 48
16 // 9 00 12 99
16 // 8 00 08 68
16 // 7 00 00 20
16 // 3 00 04 23
16 // 4 00 12 05
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5393
16 // 5 00 12 35
17 // 1/1 00 03 81
17 // 1/2 00 06 49
17 // 2/1 00 00 42
17 // 2/2 00 00 20
11 // 21/2 00 02 87
11 // 22 00 12 78
11 // 23/1 00 11 32
11 // 18 00 00 49
11 // 24/2/1 00 00 20
11 // 24/1 00 06 74
11 // 17 00 05 69
11 // 25 00 00 20
11 // 16 00 10 60
11 // 26 00 01 79
10 // 20 00 13 00
10 // 19 00 07 84
10 // 18 00 00 20
10 // 12 00 04 26
10 // 13 00 12 14
10 // 14 00 13 35
10 // 15 00 01 98
12 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर गडी फ़तेह खां 273 5 // 15 00 06 19
5 // 6 00 01 79
4 // 11/1 00 00 87
4 //10/2 00 12 26
4 // 9 00 12 76
4 // 2/3 00 00 20
4 // 8/2 00 04 16
4 // 8/3 00 00 20
4 // 3/1 00 06 76
4 // 3/2 00 01 13
4 // 4 00 08 19
13 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर राहों 223 325 // 4 00 05 15
325 // 5 00 11 57
312 // 25 00 01 03
324 // 1/1 00 01 41
313 // 21/1 00 09 94
रास्ता 00 01 50
313 // 21/2 00 02 90
313 // 22 00 00 20
898 रास्ता 00 01 22
5394 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
313 // 20 00 01 28
313 // 19/2 00 06 42
313 // 19/1 00 05 79 313 // 12 00 05 34 313 // 13/1 00 03 17 313 // 13/2 00 02 23 313 // 8/1 00 05 46 313 // 7 00 06 07 313 // 4/2 00 11 24 313 // 4/1 00 00 20 313 // 5 00 04 04 303 // 24 00 00 20 303 // 25 00 12 18 303 // 16 00 00 20 302 // 21 00 03 83 302 // 20 00 12 59 302 // 19 00 01 40 302 // 11 00 00 20 302 // 12 00 13 65 302 // 13 00 02 40 302 // 9 00 00 20 302 // 8 00 13 55 302 // 7 00 01 80 302 // 4 00 14 67 302 // 3 00 00 21 302 // 5 00 01 64 290 // 24 00 00 20 290 // 25 00 14 55 290 // 16 00 00 29 291 // 21 00 00 37 291 // 20 00 14 77 291 // 19 00 00 60 291 // 11 00 01 05 291 // 12 00 14 29 291 // 13 00 00 20 291 // 9 00 01 53 291 // 8 00 14 54 रास्ता 00 01 06 291 // 7 00 00 20 291 // 3 00 02 04 291 // 4/1 00 09 96 291 // 4/2 00 02 99[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5395 291 // 5 00 00 20 274 // 24 00 01 98
274 // 25 00 13 88
274 // 16 00 02 79
273 // 21 00 00 20
273 // 20/2 00 11 07
रास्ता 00 00 98
273 // 20/1 00 01 26
273 // 11/2 00 02 98
273 // 19 00 00 20
273 // 12 00 13 14
273 // 9 00 03 09
273 // 13 00 00 20
273 // 8 00 12 92
273 // 3 00 03 83
273 // 4/1 00 07 80
273 // 4/2 00 04 44
257 // 24 00 04 09
257 // 25/1/1 00 04 69
257 // 25/1/2 00 04 64
257 // 25/2 00 02 69
257 // 16 00 03 35
872 रास्ता 00 02 09
258 // 20 00 10 38
रास्ता 00 01 08
258 // 11 00 05 02
258 // 12 00 11 00
258 // 9 00 05 13
258 // 8 00 11 13
258 // 3 00 05 44
258 // 4 00 10 37
236 // 24 00 06 34
236 // 25 00 09 62
236 // 16 00 05 60
871 रास्ता 00 00 90
235 // 20 00 09 38
859 रास्ता 00 01 38
235 //11 00 05 97
235 //12 00 08 76
235 // 9 00 07 82
235 // 8 00 08 19
235 // 3 00 08 04
5396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
235 // 4 00 07 61
218 // 24 00 08 89
218 // 25 00 07 76
218 // 16 00 08 70
219 // 20 00 06 37
219 // 11 00 10 09
219 // 12 00 05 63
219 // 26 00 00 52
219 // 9/2 00 03 36
219 // 9/1 00 03 22
219 // 8 00 05 33
219 // 3 00 11 47
219 // 4 00 04 69
191/ // 24 00 11 71
191 // 25 00 04 10
191 // 16 00 12 26
861 रास्ता 00 00 93
191 // 20/2 00 03 00
190 // 11/1 00 11 48
190 // 11/2 00 01 24
190 // 12/1 00 01 11
190 // 12/2 00 02 16
190 // 10/1 00 00 20
190 // 9/1 00 12 52
191 // 9/2 00 00 20
190 // 8 00 03 13
191 // 2/2 00 00 20
190 // 4 00 02 30
190 // 3 00 13 58
185 // 23 00 00 20
185 // 24 00 12 60
185 // 25 00 00 20
14 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर पलीयां खुर्द 225 37 // 24 00 03 41
37 // 17 00 00 69
37 // 16 00 00 82
15 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर पलीयाँ कलां 226 39 // 16/2 00 09 33
39 // 16/1 00 00 91
39 // 15 00 00 81
38 // 20 00 00 81
38 // 11 00 14 28
38 // 10/2 00 00 55
53/3 रास्ता 00 01 81
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5397
38 // 12 00 00 22
38 // 9 00 13 21
38 // 2 00 00 50
38 // 8 00 01 23
38 // 3 00 14 62
38 // 4 00 01 10
35 // 23 00 00 62
35 // 24 00 14 60
35 // 25 00 00 65
35 // 17 00 00 99
35 // 16 00 13 27
35 // 15/3 00 01 88
36 // 20 00 00 20
36 // 11/2 00 11 06
36 // 10/1/2 00 00 72
36 // 9/2 00 00 97
36 // 9/1 00 06 81
36 // 26 00 00 37
16 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर रसुलपुर थेह 230 40 // 16/2 00 00 20
40 // 16/1 00 01 23
40 // 15 00 12 64
40 // 6 00 01 94
40 // 5 00 00 20
41 // 11 00 01 41
41 // 10/2 00 03 71
41 // 10/1 00 05 62
41 // 1 00 10 96
38 // 21/2 00 07 78
38 // 21/1 00 03 29
38 // 20 00 11 49
38 // 11 00 11 12
38 // 10 00 10 98
38 // 1 00 11 02
25 // 21/3 00 02 23
रास्ता 00 00 64
25 // 21/2 00 05 30
25 // 21/1 00 02 57
25 // 20 00 11 27
25 // 11 00 10 62
118/9 रास्ता 00 01 18
25 // 10 00 09 48
25 // 1/1 00 01 36
5398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
25 // 1/2 00 08 63
25 // 2 00 00 39
22 // 21/3 00 06 91
22 // 22/1 00 02 85
रास्ता 00 00 79
22 // 20 00 04 05
22 // 19/2 00 07 66
22 // 11 00 00 94
22 // 12 00 00 67
22 // 9/2 00 05 06
22 // 2 00 04 03
118/3 रास्ता 00 00 86
8 // 19 00 00 26
8 // 12/2 00 04 91
8 // 12/1 00 05 54
8 // 13/3 00 04 48
8 // 8/1 00 11 67
8 // 7 00 05 30
8 // 4/1 00 00 31
8 // 4/7 00 00 82
8 // 4/6 00 03 22
8 // 4/5 00 00 26
8 // 4/8 00 05 86
8 // 4/9 00 00 20
8 // 5/1 00 04 42
रास्ता 00 01 07
8 // 5/3 00 01 86
1 // 25/1 00 00 20
1 // 25/2 00 01 62
1 // 25/3 00 06 04
2 // 21/1 00 02 50
17 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर रामरायपुर 155 613 00 05 31
674 00 06 10
673 00 08 77
676 00 05 75
677 00 04 20
678 00 04 19
679 00 00 20
683 00 05 27
682 00 03 46
681 00 01 00
695 00 04 75
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5399
692 00 04 26
694 00 02 45
693 00 06 64
रास्ता 00 01 14
774 00 03 59
773 00 10 56
772 00 09 05
रास्ता 00 00 68
756 00 09 31
758 00 00 20
755 00 06 42
759 00 03 18
754 00 02 22
753 00 07 10
740 00 00 20
743 00 09 48
742 00 08 40
रास्ता 00 00 98
425 00 09 80
421 00 09 61
422 00 00 20
403 00 09 45
367 00 08 03
366 00 02 50
365 00 00 20
18 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर सजावलपुर 154 591 00 00 97
579 00 07 58
578 00 08 85
573 00 03 51
574 00 04 92
572 00 13 03
558 00 07 56
557 00 03 63
778/556 00 02 93
777/556 00 00 86
535/1 00 01 94
535 00 09 80
534 00 08 64
533 00 03 91
530 00 01 00
529 00 00 20
525 00 00 20
5400 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
526 00 00 20
524 00 00 20
19 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर लंगरोआ 137 70 // 9/2/1 00 00 20
70 // 9/2/2 00 00 20
70 // 9/1 00 01 01
70 // 2/2/1 00 00 99
70 // 2/1/2 00 00 20
65 // 23/2/2 00 00 20
65 // 23/1 00 00 56
65 // 18 00 04 01
65 // 13 00 09 15
65 // 8/2 00 11 07
65 // 8/1 00 00 20
65 // 3/2 00 07 59
65 // 4/1 00 03 11
64 // 23/2/2 00 00 58
64 // 23/2/1 00 01 07
64 // 24/1 00 08 85
64 // 24/2 00 00 36
64 // 17 00 10 76
64 // 14/1 00 10 87
64 // 7/3 00 00 80
64 // 7/2 00 02 60
989 रास्ता 00 01 14
64 // 7/1 00 06 67
64 // 4/1 00 10 84
रास्ता 00 00 70
56 // 24/2 00 00 61
56 // 24/1 00 00 20
56 // 24/3 00 09 47
56 // 17/1 00 09 77
56 // 17/2 00 01 14
56 // 14 00 10 56
56 // 7/3 00 10 72
56 // 7/2 00 00 20
56 // 4/3 00 07 50
रास्ता 00 01 06
56 // 4/2 00 03 30
53 // 24/2 00 11 07
53 // 17/1 00 10 76
53 // 14/2 00 10 64
53 // 7/2/2 00 11 27
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5401
53 // 4/2/1 00 02 31
53 // 4/1 00 08 42
38 // 24/2 00 04 91
38 // 24/1 00 06 27
38 // 17 00 11 07
38 // 14 00 10 89
38 // 7 00 05 59
380 00 00 72
315 00 00 89
38 // 6/2 00 00 20
38 // 4/3 00 00 27
38 // 4/2 00 10 77
34 // 24/3 00 04 72
34 // 24/2 00 05 83
34 // 17/1 00 09 01
34 // 17/2 00 00 22
34 // 27 00 00 20
रास्ता 00 01 43
34 // 14/3 00 09 18
34 // 14/1 00 00 20
34 // 7 00 10 39
34 // 4 00 10 53
19 // 24/2 00 10 35
19 // 17 00 09 50
19 // 14 00 10 62
रास्ता 00 00 71
19 // 7/1 00 10 02
19 // 4/1 00 11 67
16 // 24 00 04 12
20 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर भगोरां 139 64 // 24 00 06 64
64 // 17/2 00 06 20
64 // 17/1 00 04 83
64 // 14 00 10 70
64 // 7 00 10 34
64 // 4 00 10 05
57 // 24/1 00 05 20
57 // 24/2/1 00 05 85
57 // 17 00 11 15
57 // 14 00 11 22
57 // 7/1 00 05 81
57 // 6 00 05 59
57 // 15/1 00 00 20
5402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
57 // 5 00 12 06
51 // 25 00 12 31
51 // 16 00 10 01 51 // 15 00 00 20 50 // 20 00 00 71 50 // 11 00 00 20 50 // 10 00 09 12 50 // 1/3 00 07 38 50 // 1/4 00 04 23 50 // 2/1/1 00 00 20 45 // 21 00 06 83 45 // 22/1 00 04 70 45 // 20 00 00 20 45 // 19 00 11 72 45 // 12 00 13 34 45 // 9 00 07 73 45 // 8 00 03 71 45 // 2 00 00 20 45 // 3 00 11 39 36 // 23 00 11 49 36 // 18 00 07 09 36 // 17 00 03 71 36 // 14/1 00 02 92 36 // 14/2 00 08 68 36 // 13/2 00 00 20 36 // 7/1 00 03 96 36 // 7/2 00 06 51 279 रास्ता 00 00 82 277 रास्ता 00 02 49 36 // 4/1 00 01 15 36 // 4/2 00 07 29 36 // 5 00 01 34 31 // 24 00 00 25 31 // 25/1 00 09 48 31 // 25/2 00 00 50 31 // 16/3 00 05 81 रास्ता 00 01 97 31 // 16/2 00 02 02 31 // 15 00 08 25 31 // 6 00 00 20 32 // 11 00 03 58 32 // 10 00 11 20[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5403 32 // 1/1 00 03 69 32 // 1/2 00 07 82
21 // 21 00 09 16
21 // 22 00 02 80
21 // 20 00 00 37
21 // 19 00 10 77
21 // 12/1 00 06 06
21 // 12/2 00 05 49
21 // 9 00 08 71
21 // 8 00 00 80
21 // 2 00 02 19
21 // 3 00 09 13
18 // 23 00 11 04
18 // 18 00 11 20
18 // 17 00 00 20
18 // 13 00 05 24
18 // 14 00 06 14
18 // 8 00 00 20
18 // 7 00 11 44
18 // 4 00 11 61
7 // 27 00 00 73
7 // 24/2 00 07 31
7 // 25 00 03 10
7 // 17/1 00 00 26
7 // 16 00 11 18
7 // 15 00 08 51
21 एस. बी. एस. नगर नवांशहर सिहबाजपुर 227 2498 रास्ता 00 01 58
2463 00 06 47
2464 00 13 10
2465 00 02 84
2467 00 00 20
2466 00 10 31
2473 रास्ता 00 01 76
2475 00 11 67
2474 00 04 71
2670/2479 00 01 44
2669/2479 00 01 44
2482 00 06 94
2480 00 06 89
2488 00 00 20
2487 00 04 53
रास्ता 00 00 24
5404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2486 00 00 20
2333 00 00 85
2324 00 11 79
2325 00 06 03
2323 रास्ता 00 01 08
2319 00 06 40
2320 00 12 25
2314 00 01 50
2321 00 00 36
2313 00 13 91
2312 00 08 99
2309 रास्ता 00 04 83
2298 00 01 24
2297 00 07 97
2296 00 06 30
2295 00 08 16
2294 00 08 35
2289 00 06 48
2290 00 07 49
1856/508 00 01 32
2245 00 09 40
2165 00 11 82
2164 00 10 45
2163 00 13 86
2162 00 05 67
2140 00 09 01
2145 00 00 25
2144 00 08 07
2143 00 04 70
2142 00 00 33
2098 00 00 79
2105 रास्ता 00 01 31
2125 00 10 28
2120 00 00 20
2124 00 02 25
2121 00 12 52
2118 00 02 14
2122 00 00 20
2117 00 14 84
22 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर सिम्बली 159 रास्ता 00 00 96
84 // 15 00 03 42
84 // 6 00 09 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5405
84 // 5 00 01 32
85 // 10 00 01 83
85 // 1 00 10 32 77 // 21 00 11 24 77 // 20 00 11 50 77 // 19 00 00 20 77 // 11 00 05 82 77 // 12 00 06 38 77 // 9 00 11 11 77 // 2 00 11 84 70 // 22 00 04 32 70 // 26 00 01 65 रास्ता 00 02 42 70 // 23 00 02 78 70 // 18 00 11 70 70 // 19 00 00 20 369 रास्ता 00 01 08 70 // 13 00 10 79 70 // 8 00 10 52 70 // 7 00 00 88 70 // 3 00 01 93 70 // 4 00 10 12 52 // 24 00 11 01 52 // 17 00 12 28 52 // 16 00 00 20 52 // 14 00 03 47 52 // 15 00 07 25 रास्ता 00 00 82 52 // 26 00 02 47 52 // 6 00 08 16 52 // 5 00 09 38 रास्ता 00 03 33 51 // 1/1 00 00 20 46 // 25 00 02 05 47 // 21 00 08 28 47 // 20 00 11 78 47 // 11 00 12 21 47 // 12 00 00 20 47 // 10 00 03 96 47 // 9 00 07 01 47 // 2/1 00 00 20 47 // 2/2 00 10 315406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 26 // 22/1 00 07 33 26 // 22/2 00 04 06
26 // 19/3 00 02 47
26 // 19/1 00 01 29
रास्ता 00 01 81
26 // 18 00 05 28
26 // 13/2 00 04 84
26 // 13/1 00 06 90
26 // 8 00 10 62
345 रास्ता 00 03 18
26 // 3/2 00 02 56
26 // 3/1 00 02 02
रास्ता 00 01 89
26 // 4/1 00 03 86
23 // 24/1/2 00 00 61
23 // 24/1/1 00 11 06
23 // 17/2 00 04 44
23 // 17/1 00 03 30
23 // 14 00 08 48
23 // 15 00 01 38
23 // 6/2 00 02 15
23 // 6/1 00 08 58
रास्ता 00 01 39
23 // 7 00 00 58
23 // 5 00 05 25
23 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर धमाई 163 2375/1978 00 13 66
2374/1978 00 01 79
1977 00 04 43
1976 00 00 61
1973 00 00 20
1975 00 03 87
1935 00 27 76
1936 00 01 54
1937/2368 00 04 42
1938 00 04 25
1947 00 01 59
2368/1943 00 07 34
1939 00 00 20
1940 00 03 75
24 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर समुन्3ा 160 947 00 04 57
948 00 08 73
949 00 00 96
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5407
रास्ता 00 00 66
953 00 00 70
1888/952 00 03 06
1889/952 00 00 97
1806/951 00 00 20
1807/951 00 01 34
1206 00 06 66
1207 00 05 17
1216 00 12 35
1215 00 03 47
1217 00 06 76
1218 00 06 81
1219 00 01 72
1220 00 08 78
1221 00 06 41
1224 रास्ता 00 00 68
1223 00 01 03
1384/1225 00 01 49
1385/1225 00 03 89
1241 00 09 51
1386/1242 00 02 41
1240 00 01 97
25 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर रामगड 162 371 00 06 85
370 00 00 41
689/373 00 00 80
690/373 00 04 23
682/368 00 01 40
683/368 00 06 50
375 00 06 11
376 00 01 11
366 00 06 79
365 00 07 49
364 00 00 75
363 00 05 67
379 00 06 80
रास्ता 00 01 17
401 00 04 37
400 00 11 44
399 00 02 19
389 00 11 91
388 00 00 20
रास्ता 00 01 55
5408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
391 00 00 20
510 00 00 57
508 00 00 69
509 00 12 23
570/515 00 03 77
516 00 08 07
575/517 00 01 88
522 00 02 05
518 00 10 74
519 00 01 24
520 00 02 88
506 00 00 48
26 एस. बी. एस. नगर बालाचौर आलोवाल 242 24 // 1/2 00 00 20
23 // 5/1 00 02 50
23 // 5/2/2 00 00 23
23 // 5/2/1 00 00 26
24 // 1/1 00 03 49
21 // 21 00 11 85
21 // 22 00 05 25
21 // 19 00 10 24
21 // 18 00 07 33
21 // 13 00 10 27
21 // 14 00 03 68
21 // 8 00 00 20
21 // 7 00 12 97
21 // 4 00 05 04
21 // 5/1 00 07 80
रास्ता 00 01 04
12 // 25/1 00 04 21
12 // 25/2/1 00 06 27
12 // 25/2/2 00 00 20
12 // 16/1 00 02 15
13 // 21 00 00 21
13 // 20 00 10 47
13 // 11/1 00 07 45
13 // 11/2 00 03 45
13 // 12 00 01 78
13 // 10 00 00 32
13 // 9/1 00 09 43
87 00 03 61
13 // 9/2 00 00 18
13 // 2/2/1 00 00 95
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5409
13 // 2/2/2 00 05 92
13 // 3/1 00 00 85
13 // 3/2 00 04 55
8 // 23/2 00 01 75
8 // 23/3 00 10 72
8 // 18/3 00 00 67
8 // 17/4 00 00 20
8 // 18/2 00 00 89
8 // 18/1/1 00 01 15
8 // 18/1/2 00 01 12
8 // 17/3 00 03 35
8 // 17/2 00 03 01
8 // 17/1 00 02 65
8 // 14/1 00 02 17
8 // 14/2 00 09 77
8 // 15 00 01 28
8 // 7/1 00 00 61
8 // 6 00 13 13
8 // 5/2 00 07 08
7 // 1/2 00 05 23
7 // 1/1 00 00 92
4 // 21/1 00 06 39
4 // 21/2 00 06 84
4 // 22 00 00 20
4 // 20/1 00 02 57
4 // 19/2 00 01 32
4 // 19/1 00 09 56
4 // 12 00 10 29
4 // 13 00 02 47
4 // 9 00 00 20
4 // 8 00 07 21
27 एस. बी. एस. नगर बालाचौर सरोया 243 55 // 8 00 05 31
55 // 3/2/1 00 08 00
55 // 3/2/2 00 08 00
55 // 4/1 00 04 43
55 // 4/2 00 04 43
49 // 24 00 14 48
49 // 25 00 00 27
49 // 17 00 01 92
49 // 16 00 09 77
49 // 15 00 13 64
49 // 6/1 00 00 20
5410 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
48 // 11 00 01 01
रास्ता 00 00 97 48 // 10/2 00 03 08 48 // 10/1 00 08 76 48 // 1 00 08 32 रास्ता 00 00 20 48 // 2/1 00 01 55 48 // 2/2 00 03 15 34 // 22/2 00 09 96 34 // 22/3 00 01 97 34 // 22/1 00 01 44 34 // 23 00 00 20 34 // 19/2 00 03 36 34 // 18 00 11 28 34 // 13 00 10 55 34 // 14/1 00 02 71 34 // 14/2 00 02 71 34 // 8 00 00 20 34 // 7/1 00 13 83 34 // 7/2 00 13 83 34 // 27 00 01 34 34 // 4 00 02 92 34 // 5 00 06 01 28 // 25 00 10 46 28 // 16 00 03 83 27 // 20 00 08 89 27 // 11 00 11 86 27 // 12 00 01 66 27 // 10/2 00 00 38 27 // 9 00 10 84 27 // 2 00 10 95 16 // 22 00 10 25 16 // 19/2 00 10 66 16 // 19/3 00 01 05 16 // 12 00 11 52 16 // 9/1 00 10 65 16 // 9/2 00 10 65 16 // 2 00 10 85 9 // 22 00 11 10 9 // 19/1 00 11 05 9 // 19/2 00 11 05 9 // 12 00 11 46[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5411 9 // 9/1/1 00 10 69 9 // 9/1/2 00 10 69
9 // 9/2 00 10 69
9 // 2 00 11 19
4 // 22 00 06 54
28 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर कु कर मजारा 248 832 00 04 62
831 00 06 70
830 00 03 88
829 00 08 97
1375/840 00 01 74
827 00 06 78
1207/841 00 01 91
1205/841 00 00 20
1206/841 00 00 20
1210/842 00 01 06
1211/842 00 01 46
824 00 04 46
1203/821 00 01 17
1204/821 00 02 18
822 00 02 82
823 00 00 83
816 00 01 54
817 00 08 26
812 00 00 20
818 00 10 65
805 00 11 11
806 00 10 88
262 रास्ता 00 00 55
305 00 08 41
307 00 03 84
308 00 04 90
309 00 03 09
324 00 11 04
323 00 10 84
322 00 10 94
1332/325 00 11 03
1331/325 00 00 62
337 रास्ता 00 00 96
1315/369 रास्ता 00 00 96
1333/373 00 00 60
1334/373 00 05 53
375 00 02 04
5412 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
29 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर मौजूपुर 250 237 00 08 46236 00 10 69
235 00 11 58
150 00 03 15
487/151 00 08 70
488/151 00 01 09
489/152 00 00 41
490/152 00 05 41
153 00 01 100
441/439 00 00 20
442/439 00 00 20
30 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर रोडमजारा 251 645 00 00 48
646 00 08 35
648 00 09 04
647 00 03 43
649 00 00 20
650 00 12 56
651 00 05 70
940/670/1 00 02 77
941/670/6 00 03 36
927/653/4 00 00 62
939/669/1 00 00 68
938/669/2 00 01 45
937/669/1 00 10 08
936/661/2 00 04 43
662 00 00 20
667 00 03 44
666 00 11 100
664 00 00 89
665 रास्ता 00 00 66
31 एस.बी.एस नगर बालाचौर चांदपुर (cid:30)ड़की 366 107 // 18/1 00 05 22
107 // 18/2 00 01 71
107 // 17/1 00 02 41
107 // 13/2 00 00 20
107 // 14/2 00 02 58
107 // 14/1 00 11 87
107 // 15/1/1 00 01 15
107 // 15/1/2 00 01 15
107 // 7/2 00 00 54
107 // 6/3/1 00 08 07
107 // 6/3/2 00 02 02
413 रास्ता 00 01 79
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5413
107 // 6/2 00 00 20
रास्ता 00 00 28
107 // 6/1 00 02 15 107 // 5/2 00 00 20 106 // 1 00 16 12 106 // 2/1 00 00 51 106 // 2/2 00 01 18 106 // 2/3 00 00 20 97 // 21 00 00 20 97 // 22 00 13 82 97 // 23 00 03 45 97 // 18 00 13 10 97 // 17/1 00 04 20 97 // 6 00 09 58 98 // 1/1 00 00 20 98 // 10/1 00 06 39 971 रास्ता 00 01 06 98 // 1/2 00 09 01 98 // 2/1 00 03 98 98 // 2/2 00 02 35 93 // 22 00 09 42 93 // 23/2 00 00 20 93 // 23/1 00 07 35 93 // 18/1 00 09 26 93 // 17/1 00 07 93 93 // 14/1 00 01 24 93 // 14/2 00 06 07 93 // 15/1 00 03 16 93 // 15/2 00 04 48 970 रास्ता 00 01 15 93 // 6 00 07 20 रास्ता 00 00 88 92 // 10/2 00 04 20 92 // 10/1 00 03 43 92 // 1/2 00 08 30 92 // 1/1 00 00 55 92 // 1/3 00 01 71 136 नाला 00 04 19 85 // 22 00 00 20 85 // 23/1 00 00 98 85 // 23/2/1 00 04 83 85 // 23/2/2 00 04 835414 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 85 // 23/2/3 00 04 83 85 // 18/2 00 09 03
85 // 18/1 00 01 81 85 // 17 00 04 24 85 // 14/1 00 00 20 85 // 14/2 00 09 72 85 // 7/5 00 02 57 रास्ता 00 00 65 85 // 27 00 00 58 85 // 7/2 00 01 65 85 // 7/1 00 02 62 85 // 4 00 09 27 85 // 5 00 02 28 रास्ता 00 00 59 80 // 24 00 00 37 80 // 25/1/1 00 10 26 80 // 25/1/2 00 10 26 80 // 16/3 00 07 49 80 // 16/1 00 03 26 रास्ता 00 00 75 80 // 15/3 00 02 91 80 // 15/1 00 07 04 80 // 6/3 00 01 64 80 // 6/2 00 04 51 122 रास्ता 00 01 37 80 // 6/1 00 03 83 80 // 5/2 00 02 57 80 // 5/1 00 07 66 80 // 4/2 00 00 20 73 // 24/3 00 00 53 73 // 25 00 10 49 73 // 16/1 00 09 84 73 // 16/2 00 00 83 958 रास्ता 00 00 77 73 // 14/3 00 01 25 73 // 15/2 00 05 11 73 // 15/1 00 04 22 73 // 6 00 09 03 73 // 7/2 00 01 11 73 // 7/1 00 00 58 73 // 5/1 00 06 29 73 // 5/2 00 02 21[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5415 73 // 4/2 00 02 39 956 रास्ता 00 00 83
70 // 25/2 00 05 39
70 // 25/1 00 00 77
70 // 24/2 00 01 63
70 // 24/1 00 02 12
70 // 17/1 00 06 31
70 // 16 00 04 45
रास्ता 00 06 79
70 // 14/2 00 00 99
70 // 15 00 02 12
70 // 6 00 00 31
70 // 14/1 00 04 01
70 // 7 00 07 69
70 // 4 00 10 75
60 // 24/2 00 03 55
60 // 24/1 00 07 35
रास्ता 00 00 62
60 // 17 00 10 37
60 // 14 00 11 11
60 // 7 00 11 28
60 // 8 00 01 65
60 // 4/1 00 00 41
60 // 3 00 12 12
893 रास्ता 00 00 80
57 // 23 00 10 33
57 // 22 00 02 46
57 // 18 00 00 20
57 // 19 00 13 42
57 // 12 00 06 26
रास्ता 00 01 84
57 // 11 00 03 72
57 // 10 00 13 13
57 // 1 00 08 09
58 // 5 00 04 52
43 // 25 00 05 59
32 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर कु नैल 364 426 00 09 04
380 00 13 09
425 00 02 52
423 00 09 20
417 00 00 20
418 00 03 87
5416 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
419 00 03 24
422/2 00 06 78
420 00 01 71
422/1 00 16 11
399 00 03 13
398 00 02 44
397 00 00 78
396 00 05 33
395 00 01 59
400 00 03 58
401/2 00 05 64
394 00 00 25
393/2 00 00 20
401/1 00 06 07
339/2 00 05 56
339/1 00 16 49
335 00 00 28
336 00 07 76
33 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर बारापुर 361 86 रास्ता 00 01 42
36 // 11 00 03 78
37 // 15/2 00 03 43
37 // 15/1 00 01 32
37 // 6 00 12 93
37 // 7/1 00 00 20
37 // 5/2 00 00 22
37 // 5/1 00 01 99
37 // 4 00 10 77
30 // 24/2 00 05 72
30 // 23/3 00 00 20
318 रास्ता 00 01 71
30 // 24/1 00 01 83
30 // 23/2 00 04 11
30 // 18/2 00 03 52
30 // 18/1 00 06 81
315 रास्ता 00 01 80
30 // 13/2 00 00 20
30 // 13/1 00 03 07
30 // 12/3 00 06 78
30 // 12/2 00 04 56
30 // 9/2 00 00 20
30 // 9/3 00 03 83
30 // 9/5 00 00 28
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5417
30 // 9/1 00 02 89
रास्ता 00 02 22 30 // 9/4 00 01 87 30 // 2/3 00 00 58 रास्ता 00 00 20 30 // 2/2 00 00 20 30 // 2/1 00 09 90 30 // 1 00 00 21 19 // 22/3 00 02 73 19 // 21/2 00 02 39 19 // 22/1 00 00 38 19 // 21/1 00 06 18 19 // 20 00 11 90 19 // 11 00 10 95 19 // 10 00 02 23 रास्ता 00 00 20 20//15 00 00 20 342 रास्ता 00 02 74 20 // 6 00 07 24 20 // 5/2 00 06 01 20 // 5/1 00 05 55 12 // 25/2 00 06 10 12 // 25/1 00 05 65 12 // 28 00 00 65 12 // 24 00 00 20 12 // 16/2 00 00 26 12 // 16/3 00 02 95 12 // 17 00 07 38 12 // 14/2 00 10 22 89 रास्ता 00 01 77 12 // 7 00 11 44 283 रास्ता 00 00 20 12 // 4/3 00 02 19 12 // 4/2 00 10 89 12 // 5 00 00 20 6 // 24 00 02 95 6 // 25/1 00 09 24 6 // 16/2 00 01 97 6 // 16/1 00 10 16 6 // 15 00 06 24 5 // 11 00 04 44 6 // 6 00 00 205418 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5 // 10 00 06 80
34 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर मैरा 481 47 // 10 00 05 51
47 // 9 00 00 59
47 // 1 00 01 34
47 // 2 00 11 59
44 // 22 00 11 14
44 // 23 00 01 75
44 // 19 00 00 35
44 // 18 00 12 06
44 // 13 00 09 69
44 // 14 00 02 06
रास्ता 00 00 72
44 // 8/1 00 04 81
44 // 7 00 06 18
44 // 3 00 10 86
44 // 4 00 03 60
39 // 24 00 01 11
39 // 23 00 10 23
39 // 17 00 00 20
39 // 18 00 10 54
39 // 13 00 10 97
39 // 8 00 10 78
39 // 3 00 10 94
35 // 23 00 11 15
35 // 18/2 00 08 37
35 // 18/1 00 02 23
35 // 13/2 00 04 82
35 // 13/1 00 05 75
रास्ता 00 00 64
35 // 8 00 10 89
35 // 3 00 10 90
30 // 24 00 10 28
रास्ता 00 00 71
30 // 18/1 00 09 26
30 // 18/2 00 01 48
30 // 13/1 00 05 90
30 // 13/2 00 04 90
30 // 12/2 00 00 20
30 // 8/2 00 07 36
30 // 8/1 00 01 63
30 // 9/3 00 00 95
30 // 9/1 00 00 25
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5419
30 // 2/6 00 00 64
30 // 2/5 00 00 48
30 // 2/4 00 02 02 30 // 2/3 00 01 56 30 // 3/3 00 02 24 30 // 3/2 00 03 32 30 // 2/7 00 02 02 30 // 2/8 00 01 58 30 // 3/1 00 01 02 25 // 23/2 00 02 74 25 // 22/4 00 04 39 25 // 23/1 00 00 99 25 // 22/1 00 02 62 25 // 19/2 00 01 57 25 // 18/2 00 00 45 25 // 19/1 00 07 54 25 // 18/1 00 01 07 25 // 12/2 00 09 45 25 // 12/1 00 01 16 25 // 9/3 00 01 68 रास्ता 00 03 45 25 // 9/1 00 05 65 25 // 2/3 00 03 32 25 // 2/2 00 07 59 21 // 22/2 00 01 80 21 // 22/1 00 08 70 रास्ता 00 00 61 21 // 19/3 00 07 74 21 // 19/1 00 03 27 21 // 12/3 00 01 64 21 // 12/1 00 09 06 21 // 9 00 10 39 21 // 2 00 11 36 14 // 22 00 10 64 14 // 19 00 10 92 14 // 20/2 00 00 20 14 // 20/1/2 00 00 20 14 // 11/2/1 00 00 56 14 // 11/2/2 00 02 15 14 // 12/2 00 03 15 14 // 12/1 00 04 43 14 // 10/2 00 03 765420 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 14 // 9/2 00 03 68
रास्ता 00 01 74
14 // 10/1 00 01 38
14 // 1/2 00 02 49
14 // 2/1 00 01 22
14 // 1/1 00 07 26
11 // 21/3 00 03 31
11 // 22 00 14 79
11 // 19/2 00 00 20
11 // 23/1 00 02 23
11 // 18 00 12 69
11 // 17 00 08 20
11 // 14/1 00 00 27
11 // 14/2 00 05 95
11 // 15 00 13 62
11 // 6 00 02 31
12 // 11 00 00 20
12 // 10 00 13 46
35 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर डल्लेवाल 482 48 // 2 00 11 78
48 // 3 00 00 97
39 // 22 00 00 72
39 // 23/1 00 05 66
39 // 23/2 00 07 29
39 // 18/1 00 00 64
29 // 24 00 01 00
39 // 17 00 12 92
39 // 14 00 00 20
39 // 16/2 00 01 78
39 // 15/1 00 04 58
39 // 15/2 00 06 97
40 // 11 00 03 85
40 // 10 00 11 36
40 // 9 00 04 17
40 // 2 00 10 59
रास्ता 00 01 61
40 // 3 00 04 49
36 // 23 00 07 51
36 // 24 00 07 67
36 // 17 00 06 08
36 // 16 00 09 64
36 // 15 00 04 62
35 // 11 00 11 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5421
35 // 12 00 00 20
35 // 10 00 02 89
35 // 9 00 13 24 35 // 8 00 01 09 35 // 2 00 00 56 35 // 3 00 12 64 35 // 4 00 02 02 28 // 23/2 00 00 20 28 // 24 00 12 47 रास्ता 00 01 03 28 // 25 00 01 30 28 // 17/2 00 00 20 28 // 16 00 11 22 29 // 20/2 00 04 69 रास्ता 00 01 16 29 // 11/1 00 03 19 29 // 11/2 00 04 08 29 // 12 00 08 30 29 // 9 00 04 73 29 // 8 00 12 49 29 // 7 00 00 28 29 // 3/3/2 00 01 57 29 // 4 00 12 30 22 // 24 00 00 20 132 रास्ता 00 01 87 29 // 5/1 00 00 89 रास्ता 00 00 62 22 // 25/2 00 05 26 22 // 25/1 00 06 63 22 // 16/1 00 00 20 21 // 21/1 00 01 89 21 // 21/3 00 00 26 21 // 20/3 00 01 54 21 // 20/2/2 00 00 43 21 // 20/2/1 00 04 45 21 // 20/1 00 06 15 21 // 19/3 00 01 70 21 // 19/2 00 01 48 21 // 12/2 00 01 09 21 // 11/3 00 00 20 21 // 12/1 00 09 62 21 // 13/1 00 06 405422 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 21 // 8/2 00 06 83
रास्ता 00 01 09 21 // 7/3 00 01 93 21 // 7/2 00 00 29 रास्ता 00 00 95 21 // 7/1 00 06 03 21 // 4/2 00 04 53 21 // 5 00 12 17 17 // 25 00 02 89 18 // 21/2 00 03 80 18 // 21/1 00 09 37 18 / 20 00 00 85 18 // 22 00 00 84 18 // 19 00 13 69 18 // 12 00 00 30 18 // 18/1 00 01 63 18 // 13/2 00 06 01 18 // 13/1 00 05 72 रास्ता 00 00 91 18 // 14/4 00 00 87 18 // 14/5 00 00 20 18 // 14/1 00 02 62 18 // 14/2 00 00 90 18 // 7/3 00 00 88 18 // 7/2 00 05 11 18 // 7/1 00 03 42 18 // 6/3 00 05 64 18 // 6/2 00 01 01 18 // 6/1 00 01 97 18 // 5/2 00 10 60 18 // 5/3 00 00 96 19 // 1/1 00 00 20 10 // 25 00 04 14 9 // 21/1 00 05 50 9 // 21/2 00 00 20 रास्ता 00 00 86 9 // 20/3 00 00 20 9 // 20/2 00 03 43 9 // 20/1 00 08 14 9 // 11/1 00 00 20 9 // 11/2/2 00 09 71 9 // 11/2/1 00 00 38[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5423 9 // 12/2 00 00 69 9 // 12/1 00 00 31
9 // 10/1 00 01 21
9 // 10/2 00 00 20
9 // 9/2/2 00 00 31
9 // 9/2/3 00 06 89
9 // 9/1 00 03 78
9 // 2/2 00 00 65
9 // 2/3 00 03 47
9 // 2/4 00 05 46
9 // 2/5 00 05 37
9 // 3/1 00 00 20
रास्ता 00 00 63
6 // 22/2 00 01 39
6 // 23 00 07 65
6 // 18 00 10 82
6 // 13/2 00 02 65
रास्ता 00 02 09
6 // 14/2 00 03 95
6 // 14/1 00 02 11
6 // 7/2 00 03 31
6 // 7/1 00 06 87
6 // 4 00 08 36
36 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर गदीवाल 483 5 // 4 00 04 52
1 // 24/4 00 03 38
1 // 24/3 00 06 39
1 // 25/1 00 01 44
1 // 17/1 00 00 93
1 // 16/2 00 05 61
110 रास्ता 00 00 90
1 // 16/1/2 00 01 89
1 // 16/1/1 00 02 27
1 // 15/3 00 02 73
1 // 15/2 00 09 05
2 // 11 00 00 24
37 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर मानसोवाल 484 9 00 00 20
2999/7 00 08 51
8 00 08 88
16 00 04 20
18 00 02 30
17 00 16 51
3276/27 00 08 48
5424 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
31 00 00 20
3274/25 00 00 20
28 00 19 71
29 00 01 32
3273/25 00 02 06
491 00 17 55
3135/490 00 00 75
3137/490 00 04 87
3138/490 00 04 87
494 00 00 92
495 00 14 47
38 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर कोकोवाल 476 1120 00 08 40
1108 00 09 57
1107 00 07 26
1105 00 08 47
1099 00 00 56
1098 00 00 20
1100 00 06 54
1101 00 01 15
1095 00 04 06
1094 00 02 67
1093 00 02 31
1092 00 02 18
1089 00 01 36
1088 00 02 18
1068 00 01 54
1066 00 09 48
1062 00 00 64
1067 00 00 92
1061 00 07 78
1060 00 03 35
1059 00 00 20
1058 00 00 95
1057 00 02 56
1056 00 02 20
1055 00 01 94
1036 00 05 72
1035 00 07 73
561 00 00 84
560 00 04 85
559 00 00 62
345 00 08 05
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5425
346 00 02 55
347 00 01 51
350 00 03 27
351 00 00 61
352 00 04 01
354 00 04 58
357 00 07 05
328 रास्ता 00 01 03
360 00 05 100
368 00 05 52
380 रास्ता 00 02 60
379 00 03 07
378 00 04 66
377 00 06 74
382 00 00 20
376 00 03 54
383 00 01 41
461 00 01 68
462 00 01 32
463-464 00 05 76
467 00 00 20
466 00 09 54
472 00 01 39
473 00 04 05
473/1 00 05 94
471 00 00 20
रास्ता 00 00 88
449 00 00 54
448 00 00 46
447 00 00 20
474 00 08 36
39 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर बीनेवाल 477 60 // 9/1 00 05 27
60 // 2 00 03 77
60 // 1/2 00 08 67
60 // 1/1 00 02 47
937 रास्ता 00 01 09
41 // 21/1 00 07 69
42 // 25 00 04 72
42 // 16 00 13 72
रास्ता 00 00 70
42 // 17 00 00 21
42 // 15/2 00 02 01
5426 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
42 // 14 00 12 54
42 // 7/3 00 04 69
42 // 7/2 00 02 02
42 // 8/2 00 00 20
42 // 8/1 00 04 15
140 रास्ता 00 01 52
42 // 8/3 00 01 23
42 // 3 00 12 51
39 // 23/1 00 10 28
39 // 23/2 00 01 03
39 // 18/2 00 07 98
39 // 18/1 00 03 82
39 // 13/2 00 11 00
39 // 8/1 00 07 59
39 // 7 00 03 95
39 // 3/2 00 02 07
40 होिशयारपुर गढ़शंकर मजारी 475 19 // 1/1/1 00 06 02
19 // 1/1/2 00 00 31
19 // 1/2/2 00 01 31
19 // 1/2/1 00 00 38
14 // 21/2 00 00 23
14 // 21/1/1/1 00 07 76
14 // 22/1 00 04 68
14 // 19/5/2 00 00 20
14 // 19/4/2 00 00 20
14 // 19/4/1 00 00 21
14 // 19/3 00 00 92
14 // 19/2/2 00 06 94
14 // 19/2/1 00 00 20
14 // 19/1/2 00 02 83
14 // 19/1/1 00 01 71
14 // 18/3 00 02 52
14 // 12 00 01 80
14 // 13/1 00 02 78
14 // 13/2 00 02 07
14 // 13/3 00 01 73
14 // 14 00 09 17
रास्ता 00 04 64
14 // 18/2 00 00 39
14 // 18/1 00 00 38
14 // 17/3 00 00 20
14 // 17/2 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5427
14 // 15/1 00 01 10
14 // 15/2 00 02 50
14 // 15/3 00 07 67 रास्ता 00 01 14 15 // 11/2 00 12 11 15 // 12 00 11 77 15 // 13/1 00 02 06 15 // 13/2 00 08 88 रास्ता 00 01 10 15 // 14/1 00 01 35 15 // 14/2 00 10 82 15 // 15 00 11 17 रास्ता 00 00 86 16 // 11/1 00 04 34 16 // 11/2 00 07 70 16 // 10 00 00 20 16 // 12 00 04 60 16 // 9/2 00 00 39 16 // 9/1 00 08 49 16 // 32 00 00 77 16 // 31 00 05 40 16 // 8 00 00 20 16 // 3/2 00 02 82 16 // 3/1 00 08 76 9 // 23/2 00 05 35 9 // 24 00 06 99 9 // 17 00 00 37 174 रास्ता 00 01 13
[फा. सं. आर-25011/30/2017-ओआर-I]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 23rd August, 2017
S.O. 2016.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of PAJPL to Una Petroleum Products Branch Pipeline from Village : Jhungian, District : Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar of Punjab State to Village: Pekhubela, District : Una of Himachal Pradesh, should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the petroleum and Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
5428 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under sub-section (1) of the section 3 of said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein of laying of the pipeline under the land to Smt. Ranjit Kaur, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (Pipelines Division), PAJPL to Una Branch Pipeline Project, 331-B, Surya Enclave, GT Road By-pass, Jalandhar (PUNJAB) - 144009.
SCHEDULE
| State : Punjab | ||||||||
| Sr. No. | Name of District | Name of Tehsil | Name of Village | Hadbast No. | Murabba // Killa OR Khasara No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq. mtr. | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
1 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Jhungian 285 12 // 1 00 03 18
6 // 25/2 00 00 20
5 // 21 00 08 79
5 // 22 00 13 17
5 // 23 00 04 55
5 // 19/2 00 00 20
5 // 18/2 00 08 30
5 // 17/1 00 01 76
5 // 17/2 00 11 23
5 // 16 00 08 79
5 // 15 00 03 55
4 // 20 00 00 28
4 // 11 00 12 93
4 // 12 00 12 08
4 // 13 00 03 01
4 // 9/1 00 00 26
4 // 8 00 09 82
4 // 7 00 06 65
38 Rasta 00 02 46
2 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Julah Majra 286 54 // 8 00 00 20
79/1 Rasta 00 00 32
54 // 7 00 07 76
54 // 4 00 00 81
54 // 6 00 01 69
54 // 5/2 00 12 50
53 //1 00 00 83
3 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Khoja 284 22 // 6 00 00 20
21 // 1 00 11 55
21 // 2 00 01 60
9 // 21 00 01 13
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5429
9 // 22 00 11 27
9 // 23 00 12 69
9 // 24 00 07 50 9 // 17 00 05 80 9 // 16 00 13 26 10 // 20 00 11 79 10 // 11 00 00 61 10 // 12 00 10 33 10 // 19 00 02 30 10 // 13 00 13 01 10 // 14 00 07 84 10 // 15 00 00 20 10 // 7 00 05 05 10 // 6 00 12 59 11 // 10 00 12 44 11 // 9 00 03 23 11 // 1 00 00 26 11 // 2 00 09 88 11 // 3 00 12 46 11 // 4 00 09 31 11 // 5 00 00 20 7 // 24 00 03 91 7 // 25 00 13 31 6 // 21 00 11 13 6 // 22 00 00 79 6 // 20 00 01 70 6 // 19 00 11 60 6 // 18 00 12 86 6 // 17 00 06 48 6 // 14 00 06 35 6 // 15 00 12 99 5 // 11/1 00 08 72 5 // 11/2 00 00 64 5 // 11/3 00 02 53 98 Rasta 00 00 82 5 // 28 00 01 64 5 // 12/1 00 02 08 5 // 12/2 00 00 98 5 // 9/2 00 08 58 62 00 01 55 5 // 8 00 09 64 5 // 7 00 12 285430 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5 // 6 00 11 14 4 // 10/2/1 00 05 80
4 // 10/2/2 00 03 89
4 // 10/1 00 02 71
4 // 9 00 06 63
4 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Tajpur 283 27 // 2 00 00 20
27 // 9 00 02 43
27 // 3 00 02 73
27 // 4 00 07 68
27 // 5 00 11 55
27 // 8 00 09 51
27 // 7 00 04 82
27 // 6 00 00 78
26 // 1 00 12 76
26 // 2/1 00 06 07
46 Rasta 00 00 20
45 Rasta 00 02 47
26 // 2/3 00 03 96
26 // 3 00 07 55
5 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Lalewal 282 6 // 3 00 04 53
6 // 4 00 12 31
6 // 5 00 07 27
1 // 25 00 06 01
2 // 21 00 08 86
6 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Bazidpur 217 63 // 21 00 00 85
132 Rasta 00 02 16
63 // 22 00 10 28
63 // 23 00 12 07
63 // 24 00 12 23
63 // 25 00 10 22
63 // 16 00 01 80
63 // 17 00 00 20
62 // 20 00 06 99
62 // 21 00 04 66
62 // 22/1 00 00 41
62 // 19 00 12 25
62 // 18 00 12 04
62 // 17 00 12 28
62 // 16 00 09 79
61 // 20 00 12 11
61 // 11 00 00 23
61 // 12 00 04 30
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5431
61 // 19 00 07 34
61 // 18 00 01 29
61 // 13 00 10 95
61 // 14 00 12 34
61 // 15 00 11 93
60 // 11/1 00 02 51
60 // 11/2 00 09 15
60 // 12 00 11 99
484 Rasta 00 00 20
60 // 8/1 00 00 20
60 // 8/2 00 04 29
60 // 13 00 07 53
60 // 7/2 00 10 90
60 // 14 00 02 02
7 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Garhi Bharti 218 55 // 6 00 09 62
85 Rasta 00 01 21
56 // 10 00 13 76
8 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Bharta Kalan 219 53 // 9 00 09 98
53 // 8 00 12 19
53 // 7 00 12 09
53 // 4 00 00 20
53 // 5 00 02 02
53 // 6 00 10 30
52 // 1 00 06 84
52 // 10 00 05 29
52 // 2 00 11 40
52 // 9 00 00 53
52 // 3 00 12 14
52 // 4/2 00 12 23
52 // 5/1 00 05 73
52 // 5/2 00 03 41
52 // 5/3 00 03 16
51 // 1/1 00 01 41
51 // 1/2 00 09 00
51 // 2/1 00 09 81
51 // 2/2 00 02 32
51 // 3/1 00 11 95
51 // 4 00 08 00
51 // 5 00 01 12
46 // 23 00 00 39
46 // 24 00 06 06
46 // 25 00 11 51
5432 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47 // 21 00 11 40
Rasta 00 01 06
47 // 22 00 12 37
47 // 23 00 11 73
47 // 18 00 00 20
47 // 17 00 03 90
47 // 24 00 08 52
47 // 25 00 02 12
47 // 16 00 10 27
48 // 20 00 11 91
48 // 19/2 00 11 82
48 // 18 00 11 39
9 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Dariyapur 278 15 // 18 00 00 68
15 // 17 00 11 27
15 // 14 00 01 17
15 // 15 00 07 20
15 // 16 00 05 60
14 // 20/2 00 00 51
14 // 11/1 00 03 50
33 Rasta 00 01 48
14 // 11/2 00 06 93
14 // 20/1/1 00 00 20
14 // 12 00 12 59
14 // 26 00 00 95
14 // 13/1 00 01 10
14 // 13/2 00 10 71
14 // 14 00 12 14
14 // 15 00 12 05
13 // 11/1 00 03 85
13 // 10/2 00 00 20
43 Rasta 00 07 12
13 // 10/1 00 00 20
13 // 11/2 00 05 86
13 // 12 00 05 59
13 // 13/1 00 00 68
13 // 9/1 00 03 78
13 // 8/1 00 09 50
13 // 7/1 00 12 47
13 // 6/1 00 12 46
12 // 26 00 03 35
12 // 10/1 00 08 90
12 // 9/1 00 12 88
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5433
12 // 8/1 00 10 63
12 // 3 00 01 60
12 // 4 00 07 66
12 // 5 00 04 26
12 // 6 00 00 22
12 // 7/1 00 04 99
10 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Kahlon 222 69 // 5 00 07 45
69 // 6 00 00 27
70 // 1/1 00 07 60
70 // 1/2 00 04 42
70 // 2 00 11 94
70 // 3 00 10 70
132 Rasta 00 01 37
70 // 4 00 11 85
70 // 5 00 11 90
67 // 25 00 00 21
71 // 1 00 07 87
71 // 2 00 01 98
66 // 21 00 03 99
66 // 22 00 10 54
66 // 23/1 00 06 38
66 // 23/2 00 06 09
66 // 24 00 11 83
66 // 25 00 11 73
65 // 20 00 00 20
65 // 21 00 10 10
65 // 19 00 02 90
65 // 22 00 08 67
65 // 18 00 08 78
65 // 23 00 03 01
65 //24 00 00 20
65 // 17 00 12 14
65 // 16 00 11 50
124 Rasta 00 01 51
64 // 20 00 10 74
64 // 19 00 12 13
64 // 18 00 11 75
64 // 13 00 00 20
64 // 14 00 03 28
64 // 17 00 08 77
64 // 15 00 02 07
64 // 16 00 01 27
5434 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Udhowal 272 14 // 15/1 00 06 1114 // 15/2 00 00 20
15 // 11 00 12 03
15 // 12 00 12 25
15 // 13 00 12 55
Rasta 00 00 88
15 // 14 00 11 28
15 // 15 00 08 98
15 // 6 00 03 97
16 // 11 00 00 20
16 // 10/2 00 12 00
16 // 10/1 00 00 48
16 // 9 00 12 99
16 // 8 00 08 68
16 // 7 00 00 20
16 // 3 00 04 23
16 // 4 00 12 05
16 // 5 00 12 35
17 // 1/1 00 03 81
17 // 1/2 00 06 49
17 // 2/1 00 00 42
17 // 2/2 00 00 20
11 // 21/2 00 02 87
11 // 22 00 12 78
11 // 23/1 00 11 32
11 // 18 00 00 49
11 // 24/2/1 00 00 20
11 // 24/1 00 06 74
11 // 17 00 05 69
11 // 25 00 00 20
11 // 16 00 10 60
11 // 26 00 01 79
10 // 20 00 13 00
10 // 19 00 07 84
10 // 18 00 00 20
10 // 12 00 04 26
10 // 13 00 12 14
10 // 14 00 13 35
10 // 15 00 01 98
12 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Garhi Fateh Khan. 273 5 // 15 00 06 19
5 // 6 00 01 79
4 // 11/1 00 00 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5435
4 //10/2 00 12 26
4 // 9 00 12 76
4 // 2/3 00 00 20
4 // 8/2 00 04 16
4 // 8/3 00 00 20
4 // 3/1 00 06 76
4 // 3/2 00 01 13
4 // 4 00 08 19
13 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Rahon 223 325 // 4 00 05 15
325 // 5 00 11 57
312 // 25 00 01 03
324 // 1/1 00 01 41
313 // 21/1 00 09 94
Rasta 00 01 50
313 // 21/2 00 02 90
313 // 22 00 00 20
898 Rasta 00 01 22
313 // 20 00 01 28
313 // 19/2 00 06 42
313 // 19/1 00 05 79
313 // 12 00 05 34
313 // 13/1 00 03 17
313 // 13/2 00 02 23
313 // 8/1 00 05 46
313 // 7 00 06 07
313 // 4/2 00 11 24
313 // 4/1 00 00 20
313 // 5 00 04 04
303 // 24 00 00 20
303 // 25 00 12 18
303 // 16 00 00 20
302 // 21 00 03 83
302 // 20 00 12 59
302 // 19 00 01 40
302 // 11 00 00 20
302 // 12 00 13 65
302 // 13 00 02 40
302 // 9 00 00 20
302 // 8 00 13 55
302 // 7 00 01 80
302 // 4 00 14 67
302 // 3 00 00 21
5436 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
302 // 5 00 01 64
290 // 24 00 00 20
290 // 25 00 14 55 290 // 16 00 00 29 291 // 21 00 00 37 291 // 20 00 14 77 291 // 19 00 00 60 291 // 11 00 01 05 291 // 12 00 14 29 291 // 13 00 00 20 291 // 9 00 01 53 291 // 8 00 14 54 Rasta 00 01 06 291 // 7 00 00 20 291 // 3 00 02 04 291 // 4/1 00 09 96 291 // 4/2 00 02 99 291 // 5 00 00 20 274 // 24 00 01 98 274 // 25 00 13 88 274 // 16 00 02 79 273 // 21 00 00 20 273 // 20/2 00 11 07 Rasta 00 00 98 273 // 20/1 00 01 26 273 // 11/2 00 02 98 273 // 19 00 00 20 273 // 12 00 13 14 273 // 9 00 03 09 273 // 13 00 00 20 273 // 8 00 12 92 273 // 3 00 03 83 273 // 4/1 00 07 80 273 // 4/2 00 04 44 257 // 24 00 04 09 257 // 25/1/1 00 04 69 257 // 25/1/2 00 04 64 257 // 25/2 00 02 69 257 // 16 00 03 35 872 Rasta 00 02 09 258 // 20 00 10 38 Rasta 00 01 08[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5437 258 // 11 00 05 02 258 // 12 00 11 00
258 // 9 00 05 13 258 // 8 00 11 13 258 // 3 00 05 44 258 // 4 00 10 37 236 // 24 00 06 34 236 // 25 00 09 62 236 // 16 00 05 60 871 Rasta 00 00 90 235 // 20 00 09 38 859 Rasta 00 01 38 235 //11 00 05 97 235 //12 00 08 76 235 // 9 00 07 82 235 // 8 00 08 19 235 // 3 00 08 04 235 // 4 00 07 61 218 // 24 00 08 89 218 // 25 00 07 76 218 // 16 00 08 70 219 // 20 00 06 37 219 // 11 00 10 09 219 // 12 00 05 63 219 // 26 00 00 52 219 // 9/2 00 03 36 219 // 9/1 00 03 22 219 // 8 00 05 33 219 // 3 00 11 47 219 // 4 00 04 69 191/ // 24 00 11 71 191 // 25 00 04 10 191 // 16 00 12 26 861 Rasta 00 00 93 191 // 20/2 00 03 00 190 // 11/1 00 11 48 190 // 11/2 00 01 24 190 // 12/1 00 01 11 190 // 12/2 00 02 16 190 // 10/1 00 00 20 190 // 9/1 00 12 52 191 // 9/2 00 00 205438 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 190 // 8 00 03 13 191 // 2/2 00 00 20
190 // 4 00 02 30
190 // 3 00 13 58
185 // 23 00 00 20
185 // 24 00 12 60
185 // 25 00 00 20
14 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Pallian khurd 225 37 // 24 00 03 41
37 // 17 00 00 69
37 // 16 00 00 82
15 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Pallian Kalan 226 39 // 16/2 00 09 33
39 // 16/1 00 00 91
39 // 15 00 00 81
38 // 20 00 00 81
38 // 11 00 14 28
38 // 10/2 00 00 55
53/3 Rasta 00 01 81
38 // 12 00 00 22
38 // 9 00 13 21
38 // 2 00 00 50
38 // 8 00 01 23
38 // 3 00 14 62
38 // 4 00 01 10
35 // 23 00 00 62
35 // 24 00 14 60
35 // 25 00 00 65
35 // 17 00 00 99
35 // 16 00 13 27
35 // 15/3 00 01 88
36 // 20 00 00 20
36 // 11/2 00 11 06
36 // 10/1/2 00 00 72
36 // 9/2 00 00 97
36 // 9/1 00 06 81
36 // 26 00 00 37
16 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Rasulpur Theh 230 40 // 16/2 00 00 20
40 // 16/1 00 01 23
40 // 15 00 12 64
40 // 6 00 01 94
40 // 5 00 00 20
41 // 11 00 01 41
41 // 10/2 00 03 71
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5439
41 // 10/1 00 05 62
41 // 1 00 10 96
38 // 21/2 00 07 78 38 // 21/1 00 03 29 38 // 20 00 11 49 38 // 11 00 11 12 38 // 10 00 10 98 38 // 1 00 11 02 25 // 21/3 00 02 23 Rasta 00 00 64 25 // 21/2 00 05 30 25 // 21/1 00 02 57 25 // 20 00 11 27 25 // 11 00 10 62 118/9 Rasta 00 01 18 25 // 10 00 09 48 25 // 1/1 00 01 36 25 // 1/2 00 08 63 25 // 2 00 00 39 22 // 21/3 00 06 91 22 // 22/1 00 02 85 Rasta 00 00 79 22 // 20 00 04 05 22 // 19/2 00 07 66 22 // 11 00 00 94 22 // 12 00 00 67 22 // 9/2 00 05 06 22 // 2 00 04 03 118/3 Rasta 00 00 86 8 // 19 00 00 26 8 // 12/2 00 04 91 8 // 12/1 00 05 54 8 // 13/3 00 04 48 8 // 8/1 00 11 67 8 // 7 00 05 30 8 // 4/1 00 00 31 8 // 4/7 00 00 82 8 // 4/6 00 03 22 8 // 4/5 00 00 26 8 // 4/8 00 05 86 8 // 4/9 00 00 20 8 // 5/1 00 04 425440 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Rasta 00 01 07 8 // 5/3 00 01 86
1 // 25/1 00 00 20
1 // 25/2 00 01 62
1 // 25/3 00 06 04
2 // 21/1 00 02 50
17 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Ramraipur 155 613 00 05 31
674 00 06 10
673 00 08 77
676 00 05 75
677 00 04 20
678 00 04 19
679 00 00 20
683 00 05 27
682 00 03 46
681 00 01 00
695 00 04 75
692 00 04 26
694 00 02 45
693 00 06 64
Rasta 00 01 14
774 00 03 59
773 00 10 56
772 00 09 05
Rasta 00 00 68
756 00 09 31
758 00 00 20
755 00 06 42
759 00 03 18
754 00 02 22
753 00 07 10
740 00 00 20
743 00 09 48
742 00 08 40
Rasta 00 00 98
425 00 09 80
421 00 09 61
422 00 00 20
403 00 09 45
367 00 08 03
366 00 02 50
365 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5441
18 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Sajawalpur 154 591 00 00 97579 00 07 58
578 00 08 85
573 00 03 51
574 00 04 92
572 00 13 03
558 00 07 56
557 00 03 63
778/556 00 02 93
777/556 00 00 86
535/1 00 01 94
535 00 09 80
534 00 08 64
533 00 03 91
530 00 01 00
529 00 00 20
525 00 00 20
526 00 00 20
524 00 00 20
19 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Langroya 137 70 // 9/2/1 00 00 20
70 // 9/2/2 00 00 20
70 // 9/1 00 01 01
70 // 2/2/1 00 00 99
70 // 2/1/2 00 00 20
65 // 23/2/2 00 00 20
65 // 23/1 00 00 56
65 // 18 00 04 01
65 // 13 00 09 15
65 // 8/2 00 11 07
65 // 8/1 00 00 20
65 // 3/2 00 07 59
65 // 4/1 00 03 11
64 // 23/2/2 00 00 58
64 // 23/2/1 00 01 07
64 // 24/1 00 08 85
64 // 24/2 00 00 36
64 // 17 00 10 76
64 // 14/1 00 10 87
64 // 7/3 00 00 80
64 // 7/2 00 02 60
989 Rasta 00 01 14
64 // 7/1 00 06 67
5442 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
64 // 4/1 00 10 84
Rasta 00 00 70
56 // 24/2 00 00 61 56 // 24/1 00 00 20 56 // 24/3 00 09 47 56 // 17/1 00 09 77 56 // 17/2 00 01 14 56 // 14 00 10 56 56 // 7/3 00 10 72 56 // 7/2 00 00 20 56 // 4/3 00 07 50 Rasta 00 01 06 56 // 4/2 00 03 30 53 // 24/2 00 11 07 53 // 17/1 00 10 76 53 // 14/2 00 10 64 53 // 7/2/2 00 11 27 53 // 4/2/1 00 02 31 53 // 4/1 00 08 42 38 // 24/2 00 04 91 38 // 24/1 00 06 27 38 // 17 00 11 07 38 // 14 00 10 89 38 // 7 00 05 59 380 00 00 72 315 00 00 89 38 // 6/2 00 00 20 38 // 4/3 00 00 27 38 // 4/2 00 10 77 34 // 24/3 00 04 72 34 // 24/2 00 05 83 34 // 17/1 00 09 01 34 // 17/2 00 00 22 34 // 27 00 00 20 Rasta 00 01 43 34 // 14/3 00 09 18 34 // 14/1 00 00 20 34 // 7 00 10 39 34 // 4 00 10 53 19 // 24/2 00 10 35 19 // 17 00 09 50 19 // 14 00 10 62[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5443 Rasta 00 00 71 19 // 7/1 00 10 02
19 // 4/1 00 11 67
16 // 24 00 04 12
20 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Bhagauran 139 64 // 24 00 06 64
64 // 17/2 00 06 20
64 // 17/1 00 04 83
64 // 14 00 10 70
64 // 7 00 10 34
64 // 4 00 10 05
57 // 24/1 00 05 20
57 // 24/2/1 00 05 85
57 // 17 00 11 15
57 // 14 00 11 22
57 // 7/1 00 05 81
57 // 6 00 05 59
57 // 15/1 00 00 20
57 // 5 00 12 06
51 // 25 00 12 31
51 // 16 00 10 01
51 // 15 00 00 20
50 // 20 00 00 71
50 // 11 00 00 20
50 // 10 00 09 12
50 // 1/3 00 07 38
50 // 1/4 00 04 23
50 // 2/1/1 00 00 20
45 // 21 00 06 83
45 // 22/1 00 04 70
45 // 20 00 00 20
45 // 19 00 11 72
45 // 12 00 13 34
45 // 9 00 07 73
45 // 8 00 03 71
45 // 2 00 00 20
45 // 3 00 11 39
36 // 23 00 11 49
36 // 18 00 07 09
36 // 17 00 03 71
36 // 14/1 00 02 92
36 // 14/2 00 08 68
36 // 13/2 00 00 20
5444 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
36 // 7/1 00 03 96
36 // 7/2 00 06 51
279 Rasta 00 00 82 277 Rasta 00 02 49 36 // 4/1 00 01 15 36 // 4/2 00 07 29 36 // 5 00 01 34 31 // 24 00 00 25 31 // 25/1 00 09 48 31 // 25/2 00 00 50 31 // 16/3 00 05 81 Nala 00 01 97 31 // 16/2 00 02 02 31 // 15 00 08 25 31 // 6 00 00 20 32 // 11 00 03 58 32 // 10 00 11 20 32 // 1/1 00 03 69 32 // 1/2 00 07 82 21 // 21 00 09 16 21 // 22 00 02 80 21 // 20 00 00 37 21 // 19 00 10 77 21 // 12/1 00 06 06 21 // 12/2 00 05 49 21 // 9 00 08 71 21 // 8 00 00 80 21 // 2 00 02 19 21 // 3 00 09 13 18 // 23 00 11 04 18 // 18 00 11 20 18 // 17 00 00 20 18 // 13 00 05 24 18 // 14 00 06 14 18 // 8 00 00 20 18 // 7 00 11 44 18 // 4 00 11 61 7 // 27 00 00 73 7 // 24/2 00 07 31 7 // 25 00 03 10 7 // 17/1 00 00 26 7 // 16 00 11 18[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5445 7 // 15 00 08 51
21 S.B.S. Nagar Nawanshahr Sahbajpur 227 2498 Rasta 00 01 58
2463 00 06 47
2464 00 13 10
2465 00 02 84
2467 00 00 20
2466 00 10 31
2473 Rasta 00 01 76
2475 00 11 67
2474 00 04 71
2670/2479 00 01 44
2669/2479 00 01 44
2482 00 06 94
2480 00 06 89
2488 00 00 20
2487 00 04 53
Rasta 00 00 24
2486 00 00 20
2333 00 00 85
2324 00 11 79
2325 00 06 03
2323 Rasta 00 01 08
2319 00 06 40
2320 00 12 25
2314 00 01 50
2321 00 00 36
2313 00 13 91
2312 00 08 99
2309 Rasta 00 04 83
2298 00 01 24
2297 00 07 97
2296 00 06 30
2295 00 08 16
2294 00 08 35
2289 00 06 48
2290 00 07 49
1856/508 00 01 32
2245 00 09 40
2165 00 11 82
2164 00 10 45
2163 00 13 86
2162 00 05 67
5446 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2140 00 09 01
2145 00 00 25
2144 00 08 07
2143 00 04 70
2142 00 00 33
2098 00 00 79
2105 Rasta 00 01 31
2125 00 10 28
2120 00 00 20
2124 00 02 25
2121 00 12 52
2118 00 02 14
2122 00 00 20
2117 00 14 84
22 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Simbli 159 Rasta 00 00 96
84 // 15 00 03 42
84 // 6 00 09 26
84 // 5 00 01 32
85 // 10 00 01 83
85 // 1 00 10 32
77 // 21 00 11 24
77 // 20 00 11 50
77 // 19 00 00 20
77 // 11 00 05 82
77 // 12 00 06 38
77 // 9 00 11 11
77 // 2 00 11 84
70 // 22 00 04 32
70 // 26 00 01 65
Rasta 00 02 42
70 // 23 00 02 78
70 // 18 00 11 70
70 // 19 00 00 20
369 Rasta 00 01 08
70 // 13 00 10 79
70 // 8 00 10 52
70 // 7 00 00 88
70 // 3 00 01 93
70 // 4 00 10 12
52 // 24 00 11 01
52 // 17 00 12 28
52 // 16 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5447
52 // 14 00 03 47
52 // 15 00 07 25
Rasta 00 00 82 52 // 26 00 02 47 52 // 6 00 08 16 52 // 5 00 09 38 Rasta 00 03 33 51 // 1/1 00 00 20 46 // 25 00 02 05 47 // 21 00 08 28 47 // 20 00 11 78 47 // 11 00 12 21 47 // 12 00 00 20 47 // 10 00 03 96 47 // 9 00 07 01 47 // 2/1 00 00 20 47 // 2/2 00 10 31 26 // 22/1 00 07 33 26 // 22/2 00 04 06 26 // 19/3 00 02 47 26 // 19/1 00 01 29 Rasta 00 01 81 26 // 18 00 05 28 26 // 13/2 00 04 84 26 // 13/1 00 06 90 26 // 8 00 10 62 345 Rasta 00 03 18 26 // 3/2/1 00 02 56 26 // 3/1 00 02 02 Rasta 00 01 89 26 // 4/1 00 03 86 23 // 24/1/2 00 00 61 23 // 24/1/1 00 11 06 23 // 17/2 00 04 44 23 // 17/1 00 03 30 23 // 14 00 08 48 23 // 15 00 01 38 23 // 6/2 00 02 15 23 // 6/1 00 08 58 Rasta 00 01 39 23 // 7 00 00 58 23 // 5 00 05 255448 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
23 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Dhamai 163 2375/1978 00 13 662374/1978 00 01 79
1977 00 04 43
1976 00 00 61
1973 00 00 20
1975 00 03 87
1935 00 27 76
1936 00 01 54
1937/2368 00 04 42
1938 00 04 25
1947 00 01 59
2368/1943 00 07 34
1939 00 00 20
1940 00 03 75
24 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Samundra 160 947 00 04 57
948 00 08 73
949 00 00 96
Rasta 00 00 66
953 00 00 70
1888/952 00 03 06
1889/952 00 00 97
1806/951 00 00 20
1807/951 00 01 34
1206 00 06 66
1207 00 05 17
1216 00 12 35
1215 00 03 47
1217 00 06 76
1218 00 06 81
1219 00 01 72
1220 00 08 78
1221 00 06 41
1224 Rasta 00 00 68
1223 00 01 03
1384/1225 00 01 49
1385/1225 00 03 89
1241 00 09 51
1386/1242 00 02 41
1240 00 01 97
25 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Ramgarh 162 371 00 06 85
370 00 00 41
689/373 00 00 80
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5449
690/373 00 04 23
682/368 00 01 40
683/368 00 06 50
375 00 06 11
376 00 01 11
366 00 06 79
365 00 07 49
364 00 00 75
363 00 05 67
379 00 06 80
Rasta 00 01 17
401 00 04 37
400 00 11 44
399 00 02 19
389 00 11 91
388 00 00 20
Rasta 00 01 55
391 00 00 20
510 00 00 57
508 00 00 69
509 00 12 23
570/515 00 03 77
516 00 08 07
575/517 00 01 88
522 00 02 05
518 00 10 74
519 00 01 24
520 00 02 88
506 00 00 48
26 S.B.S.Nagar Balachaur Alowal 242 24 // 1/2 00 00 20
23 // 5/1 00 02 50
23 // 5/2/2 00 00 23
23 // 5/2/1 00 00 26
24 // 1/1 00 03 49
21 // 21 00 11 85
21 // 22 00 05 25
21 // 19 00 10 24
21 // 18 00 07 33
21 // 13 00 10 27
21 // 14 00 03 68
21 // 8 00 00 20
21 // 7 00 12 97
5450 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
21 // 4 00 05 04
21 // 5/1 00 07 80
Rasta 00 01 04
12 // 25/1 00 04 21
12 // 25/2/1 00 06 27
12 // 25/2/2 00 00 20
12 // 16/1 00 02 15
13 // 21 00 00 21
13 // 20 00 10 47
13 // 11/1 00 07 45
13 // 11/2 00 03 45
13 // 12 00 01 78
13 // 10 00 00 32
13 // 9/1 00 09 43
87 00 03 61
13 // 9/2 00 00 18
13 // 2/2/1 00 00 95
13 // 2/2/2 00 05 92
13 // 3/1 00 00 85
13 // 3/2 00 04 55
8 // 23/2 00 01 75
8 // 23/3 00 10 72
8 // 18/3 00 00 67
8 // 17/4 00 00 20
8 // 18/2 00 00 89
8 // 18/1/1 00 01 15
8 // 18/1/2 00 01 12
8 // 17/3 00 03 35
8 // 17/2 00 03 01
8 // 17/1 00 02 65
8 // 14/1 00 02 17
8 // 14/2 00 09 77
8 // 15 00 01 28
8 // 7/1 00 00 61
8 // 6 00 13 13
8 // 5/2 00 07 08
7 // 1/2 00 05 23
7 // 1/1 00 00 92
4 // 21/1 00 06 39
4 // 21/2 00 06 84
4 // 22 00 00 20
4 // 20/1 00 02 57
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5451
4 // 19/2 00 01 32
4 // 19/1 00 09 56
4 // 12 00 10 29
4 // 13 00 02 47
4 // 9 00 00 20
4 // 8 00 07 21
27 S.B.S.Nagar Balachaur Saroya 243 55 // 8 00 05 31
55 // 3/2/1 00 08 00
55 // 3/2/2 00 08 00
55 // 4/1 00 04 43
55 // 4/2 00 04 43
49 // 24 00 14 48
49 // 25 00 00 27
49 // 17 00 01 92
49 // 16 00 09 77
49 // 15 00 13 64
49 // 6/1 00 00 20
48 // 11 00 01 01
Rasta 00 00 97
48 // 10/2 00 03 08
48 // 10/1 00 08 76
48 // 1 00 08 32
Rasta 00 00 20
48 // 2/1 00 01 55
48 // 2/2 00 03 15
34 // 22/2 00 09 96
34 // 22/3 00 01 97
34 // 22/1 00 01 44
34 // 23 00 00 20
34 // 19/2 00 03 36
34 // 18 00 11 28
34 // 13 00 10 55
34 // 14/1 00 02 71
34 // 14/2 00 02 71
34 // 8 00 00 20
34 // 7/1 00 13 83
34 // 7/2 00 13 83
34 // 27 00 01 34
34 // 4 00 02 92
34 // 5 00 06 01
28 // 25 00 10 46
28 // 16 00 03 83
5452 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
27 // 20 00 08 89
27 // 11 00 11 86
27 // 12 00 01 66
27 // 10/2 00 00 38
27 // 9 00 10 84
27 // 2 00 10 95
16 // 22 00 10 25
16 // 19/2 00 10 66
16 // 19/3 00 01 05
16 // 12 00 11 52
16 // 9/1 00 10 65
16 // 9/2 00 10 65
16 // 2 00 10 85
9 // 22 00 11 10
9 // 19/1 00 11 05
9 // 19/2 00 11 05
9 // 12 00 11 46
9 // 9/1/1 00 10 69
9 // 9/1/2 00 10 69
9 // 9/2 00 10 69
9 // 2 00 11 19
4 // 22 00 06 54
28 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Kukar Majara 248 832 00 04 62
831 00 06 70
830 00 03 88
829 00 08 97
1375/840 00 01 74
827 00 06 78
1207/841 00 01 91
1205/841 00 00 20
1206/841 00 00 20
1210/842 00 01 06
1211/842 00 01 46
824 00 04 46
1203/821 00 01 17
1204/821 00 02 18
822 00 02 82
823 00 00 83
816 00 01 54
817 00 08 26
812 00 00 20
818 00 10 65
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5453
805 00 11 11
806 00 10 88
262 Rasta 00 00 55
305 00 08 41
307 00 03 84
308 00 04 90
309 00 03 09
324 00 11 04
323 00 10 84
322 00 10 94
1332/325 00 11 03
1331/325 00 00 62
337 Rasta 00 00 96
1315/369 Rasta 00 00 96
1333/373 00 00 60
1334/373 00 05 53
375 00 02 04 29 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Maujupur 250 237 00 08 46
236 00 10 69
235 00 11 58
150 00 03 15
487/151 00 08 70
488/151 00 01 09
489/152 00 00 41
490/152 00 05 41
153 00 01 100
441/439 00 00 20
442/439 00 00 20 30 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Rod Majara 251 645 00 00 48
646 00 08 35
648 00 09 04
647 00 03 43
649 00 00 20
650 00 12 56
651 00 05 70
940/670/1 00 02 77
941/670/6 00 03 36
927/653/4 00 00 62
939/669/1 00 00 68
938/669/2 00 01 45
937/669/1 00 10 08
936/661/2 00 04 435454 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 662 00 00 20
667 00 03 44
666 00 11 100
664 00 00 89
665 Rasta 00 00 66
31 S.B.S.Nagar Balachaur Chandpur Rurki 366 107 // 18/1 00 05 22
107 // 18/2 00 01 71
107 // 17/1 00 02 41
107 // 13/2 00 00 20
107 // 14/2 00 02 58
107 // 14/1 00 11 87
107 // 15/1/1 00 01 15
107 // 15/1/2 00 01 15
107 // 7/2 00 00 54
107 // 6/3/1 00 08 07
107 // 6/3/2 00 02 02
413 Rasta 00 01 79
107 // 6/2 00 00 20
Rasta 00 00 28
107 // 6/1 00 02 15
107 // 5/2 00 00 20
106 // 1 00 16 12
106 // 2/1 00 00 51
106 // 2/2 00 01 18
106 // 2/3 00 00 20
97 // 21 00 00 20
97 // 22 00 13 82
97 // 23 00 03 45
97 // 18 00 13 10
97 // 17/1 00 04 20
97 // 6 00 09 58
98 // 1/1 00 00 20
98 // 10/1 00 06 39
971 Rasta 00 01 06
98 // 1/2 00 09 01
98 // 2/1 00 03 98
98 // 2/2 00 02 35
93 // 22 00 09 42
93 // 23/2 00 00 20
93 // 23/1 00 07 35
93 // 18/1 00 09 26
93 // 17/1 00 07 93
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5455
93 // 14/1 00 01 24
93 // 14/2 00 06 07
93 // 15/1 00 03 16 93 // 15/2 00 04 48 970 Rasta 00 01 15 93 // 6 00 07 20 Rasta 00 00 88 92 // 10/2 00 04 20 92 // 10/1 00 03 43 92 // 1/2 00 08 30 92 // 1/1 00 00 55 92 // 1/3 00 01 71 136 Nala 00 04 19 85 // 22 00 00 20 85 // 23/1 00 00 98 85 // 23/2/1 00 04 83 85 // 23/2/2 00 04 83 85 // 23/2/3 00 04 83 85 // 18/2 00 09 03 85 // 18/1 00 01 81 85 // 17 00 04 24 85 // 14/1 00 00 20 85 // 14/2 00 09 72 85 // 7/5 00 02 57 Rasta 00 00 65 85 // 27 00 00 58 85 // 7/2 00 01 65 85 // 7/1 00 02 62 85 // 4 00 09 27 85 // 5 00 02 28 Rasta 00 00 59 80 // 24 00 00 37 80 // 25/1/1 00 10 26 80 // 25/1/2 00 10 26 80 // 16/3 00 07 49 80 // 16/1 00 03 26 Rasta 00 00 75 80 // 15/3 00 02 91 80 // 15/1 00 07 04 80 // 6/3 00 01 64 80 // 6/2 00 04 51 122 Rasta 00 01 375456 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 80 // 6/1 00 03 83 80 // 5/2 00 02 57
80 // 5/1 00 07 66 80 // 4/2 00 00 20 73 // 24/3 00 00 53 73 // 25 00 10 49 73 // 16/1 00 09 84 73 // 16/2 00 00 83 958 Rasta 00 00 77 73 // 14/3 00 01 25 73 // 15/2 00 05 11 73 // 15/1 00 04 22 73 // 6 00 09 03 73 // 7/2 00 01 11 73 // 7/1 00 00 58 73 // 5/1 00 06 29 73 // 5/2 00 02 21 73 // 4/2 00 02 39 956 Rasta 00 00 83 70 // 25/2 00 05 39 70 // 25/1 00 00 77 70 // 24/2 00 01 63 70 // 24/1 00 02 12 70 // 17/1 00 06 31 70 // 16 00 04 45 Rasta 00 06 79 70 // 14/2 00 00 99 70 // 15 00 02 12 70 // 6 00 00 31 70 // 14/1 00 04 01 70 // 7 00 07 69 70 // 4 00 10 75 60 // 24/2 00 03 55 60 // 24/1 00 07 35 Rasta 00 00 62 60 // 17 00 10 37 60 // 14 00 11 11 60 // 7 00 11 28 60 // 8 00 01 65 60 // 4/1 00 00 41 60 // 3 00 12 12 893 Rasta 00 00 80[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5457 57 // 23 00 10 33 57 // 22 00 02 46
57 // 18 00 00 20
57 // 19 00 13 42
57 // 12 00 06 26
Rasta 00 01 84
57 // 11 00 03 72
57 // 10 00 13 13
57 // 1 00 08 09
58 // 5 00 04 52
43 // 25 00 05 59
32 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Kunail 364 426 00 09 04
380 00 13 09
425 00 02 52
423 00 09 20
417 00 00 20
418 00 03 87
419 00 03 24
422/2 00 06 78
420 00 01 71
422/1 00 16 11
399 00 03 13
398 00 02 44
397 00 00 78
396 00 05 33
395 00 01 59
400 00 03 58
401/2 00 05 64
394 00 00 25
393/2 00 00 20
401/1 00 06 07
339/2 00 05 56
339/1 00 16 49
335 00 00 28
336 00 07 76
33 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Barapur 361 86 Rasta 00 01 42
36 // 11 00 03 78
37 // 15/2 00 03 43
37 // 15/1 00 01 32
37 // 6 00 12 93
37 // 7/1 00 00 20
37 // 5/2 00 00 22
5458 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
37 // 5/1 00 01 99
37 // 4 00 10 77
30 // 24/2 00 05 72 30 // 23/3 00 00 20 318 Rasta 00 01 71 30 // 24/1 00 01 83 30 // 23/2 00 04 11 30 // 18/2 00 03 52 30 // 18/1 00 06 81 315 Rasta 00 01 80 30 // 13/2 00 00 20 30 // 13/1 00 03 07 30 // 12/3 00 06 78 30 // 12/2 00 04 56 30 // 9/2 00 00 20 30 // 9/3 00 03 83 30 // 9/5 00 00 28 30 // 9/1 00 02 89 Rasta 00 02 22 30 // 9/4 00 01 87 30 // 2/3 00 00 58 Rasta 00 00 20 30 // 2/2 00 00 20 30 // 2/1 00 09 90 30 // 1 00 00 21 19 // 22/3 00 02 73 19 // 21/2 00 02 39 19 // 22/1 00 00 38 19 // 21/1 00 06 18 19 // 20 00 11 90 19 // 11 00 10 95 19 // 10 00 02 23 Rasta 00 00 20 20//15 00 00 20 342 Rasta 00 02 74 20 // 6 00 07 24 20 // 5/2 00 06 01 20 // 5/1 00 05 55 12 // 25/2 00 06 10 12 // 25/1 00 05 65 12 // 28 00 00 65 12 // 24 00 00 20[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5459 12 // 16/2 00 00 26 12 // 16/3 00 02 95
12 // 17 00 07 38
12 // 14/2 00 10 22
89 Rasta 00 01 77
12 // 7 00 11 44
283 Rasta 00 00 20
12 // 4/3 00 02 19
12 // 4/2 00 10 89
12 // 5 00 00 20
6 // 24 00 02 95
6 // 25/1 00 09 24
6 // 16/2 00 01 97
6 // 16/1 00 10 16
6 // 15 00 06 24
5 // 11 00 04 44
6 // 6 00 00 20
5 // 10 00 06 80
34 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Maira 481 47 // 10 00 05 51
47 // 9 00 00 59
47 // 1 00 01 34
47 // 2 00 11 59
44 // 22 00 11 14
44 // 23 00 01 75
44 // 19 00 00 35
44 // 18 00 12 06
44 // 13 00 09 69
44 // 14 00 02 06
Rasta 00 00 72
44 // 8/1 00 04 81
44 // 7 00 06 18
44 // 3 00 10 86
44 // 4 00 03 60
39 // 24 00 01 11
39 // 23 00 10 23
39 // 17 00 00 20
39 // 18 00 10 54
39 // 13 00 10 97
39 // 8 00 10 78
39 // 3 00 10 94
35 // 23 00 11 15
35 // 18/2 00 08 37
5460 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
35 // 18/1 00 02 23
35 // 13/2 00 04 82
35 // 13/1 00 05 75 Rasta 00 00 64 35 // 8 00 10 89 35 // 3 00 10 90 30 // 24 00 10 28 Rasta 00 00 71 30 // 18/1 00 09 26 30 // 18/2 00 01 48 30 // 13/1 00 05 90 30 // 13/2 00 04 90 30 // 12/2 00 00 20 30 // 8/2 00 07 36 30 // 8/1 00 01 63 30 // 9/3 00 00 95 30 // 9/1 00 00 25 30 // 2/6 00 00 64 30 // 2/5 00 00 48 30 // 2/4 00 02 02 30 // 2/3 00 01 56 30 // 3/3 00 02 24 30 // 3/2 00 03 32 30 // 2/7 00 02 02 30 // 2/8 00 01 58 30 // 3/1 00 01 02 25 // 23/2 00 02 74 25 // 22/4 00 04 39 25 // 23/1 00 00 99 25 // 22/1 00 02 62 25 // 19/2 00 01 57 25 // 18/2 00 00 45 25 // 19/1 00 07 54 25 // 18/1 00 01 07 25 // 12/2 00 09 45 25 // 12/1 00 01 16 25 // 9/3 00 01 68 Rasta 00 03 45 25 // 9/1 00 05 65 25 // 2/3 00 03 32 25 // 2/2 00 07 59 21 // 22/2 00 01 80[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5461 21 // 22/1 00 08 70 Rasta 00 00 61
21 // 19/3 00 07 74
21 // 19/1 00 03 27
21 // 12/3 00 01 64
21 // 12/1 00 09 06
21 // 9 00 10 39
21 // 2 00 11 36
14 // 22 00 10 64
14 // 19 00 10 92
14 // 20/2 00 00 20
14 // 20/1/2 00 00 20
14 // 11/2/1 00 00 56
14 // 11/2/2 00 02 15
14 // 12/2 00 03 15
14 // 12/1 00 04 43
14 // 10/2 00 03 76
14 // 9/2 00 03 68
Rasta 00 01 74
14 // 10/1 00 01 38
14 // 1/2 00 02 49
14 // 2/1 00 01 22
14 // 1/1 00 07 26
11 // 21/3 00 03 31
11 // 22 00 14 79
11 // 19/2 00 00 20
11 // 23/1 00 02 23
11 // 18 00 12 69
11 // 17 00 08 20
11 // 14/1 00 00 27
11 // 14/2 00 05 95
11 // 15 00 13 62
11 // 6 00 02 31
12 // 11 00 00 20
12 // 10 00 13 46
35 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Dallewal 482 48 // 2 00 11 78
48 // 3 00 00 97
39 // 22 00 00 72
39 // 23/1 00 05 66
39 // 23/2 00 07 29
39 // 18/1 00 00 64
29 // 24 00 01 00
5462 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
39 // 17 00 12 92
39 // 14 00 00 20
39 // 16/2 00 01 78 39 // 15/1 00 04 58 39 // 15/2 00 06 97 40 // 11 00 03 85 40 // 10 00 11 36 40 // 9 00 04 17 40 // 2 00 10 59 Rasta 00 01 61 40 // 3 00 04 49 36 // 23 00 07 51 36 // 24 00 07 67 36 // 17 00 06 08 36 // 16 00 09 64 36 // 15 00 04 62 35 // 11 00 11 51 35 // 12 00 00 20 35 // 10 00 02 89 35 // 9 00 13 24 35 // 8 00 01 09 35 // 2 00 00 56 35 // 3 00 12 64 35 // 4 00 02 02 28 // 23/2 00 00 20 28 // 24 00 12 47 Rasta 00 01 03 28 // 25 00 01 30 28 // 17/2 00 00 20 28 // 16 00 11 22 29 // 20/2 00 04 69 Rasta 00 01 16 29 // 11/1 00 03 19 29 // 11/2 00 04 08 29 // 12 00 08 30 29 // 9 00 04 73 29 // 8 00 12 49 29 // 7 00 00 28 29 // 3/3/2 00 01 57 29 // 4 00 12 30 22 // 24 00 00 20 132 Rasta 00 01 87[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5463 29 // 5/1 00 00 89 Rasta 00 00 62
22 // 25/2 00 05 26 22 // 25/1 00 06 63 22 // 16/1 00 00 20 21 // 21/1 00 01 89 21 // 21/3 00 00 26 21 // 20/3 00 01 54 21 // 20/2/2 00 00 43 21 // 20/2/1 00 04 45 21 // 20/1 00 06 15 21 // 19/3 00 01 70 21 // 19/2 00 01 48 21 // 12/2 00 01 09 21 // 11/3 00 00 20 21 // 12/1 00 09 62 21 // 13/1 00 06 40 21 // 8/2 00 06 83 Rasta 00 01 09 21 // 7/3 00 01 93 21 // 7/2 00 00 29 Rasta 00 00 95 21 // 7/1 00 06 03 21 // 4/2 00 04 53 21 // 5 00 12 17 17 // 25 00 02 89 18 // 21/2 00 03 80 18 // 21/1 00 09 37 18 / 20 00 00 85 18 // 22 00 00 84 18 // 19 00 13 69 18 // 12 00 00 30 18 // 18/1 00 01 63 18 // 13/2 00 06 01 18 // 13/1 00 05 72 Rasta 00 00 91 18 // 14/4 00 00 87 18 // 14/5 00 00 20 18 // 14/1 00 02 62 18 // 14/2 00 00 90 18 // 7/3 00 00 88 18 // 7/2 00 05 115464 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 18 // 7/1 00 03 42 18 // 6/3 00 05 64
18 // 6/2 00 01 01
18 // 6/1 00 01 97
18 // 5/2 00 10 60
18 // 5/3 00 00 96
19 // 1/1 00 00 20
10 // 25 00 04 14
9 // 21/1 00 05 50
9 // 21/2 00 00 20
Rasta 00 00 86
9 // 20/3 00 00 20
9 // 20/2 00 03 43
9 // 20/1 00 08 14
9 // 11/1 00 00 20
9 // 11/2/2 00 09 71
9 // 11/2/1 00 00 38
9 // 12/2 00 00 69
9 // 12/1 00 00 31
9 // 10/1 00 01 21
9 // 10/2 00 00 20
9 // 9/2/2 00 00 31
9 // 9/2/3 00 06 89
9 // 9/1 00 03 78
9 // 2/2 00 00 65
9 // 2/3 00 03 47
9 // 2/4 00 05 46
9 // 2/5 00 05 37
9 // 3/1 00 00 20
Rasta 00 00 63
6 // 22/2 00 01 39
6 // 23 00 07 65
6 // 18 00 10 82
6 // 13/2 00 02 65
Rasta 00 02 09
6 // 14/2 00 03 95
6 // 14/1 00 02 11
6 // 7/2 00 03 31
6 // 7/1 00 06 87
6 // 4 00 08 36
36 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Gaddiwal 483 5 // 4 00 04 52
1 // 24/4 00 03 38
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5465
1 // 24/3 00 06 39
1 // 25/1 00 01 44
1 // 17/1 00 00 93
1 // 16/2 00 05 61
110 Rasta 00 00 90
1 // 16/1/2 00 01 89
1 // 16/1/1 00 02 27
1 // 15/3 00 02 73
1 // 15/2 00 09 05
2 // 11 00 00 24
37 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Mansowal 484 9 00 00 20
2999/7 00 08 51
8 00 08 88
16 00 04 20
18 00 02 30
17 00 16 51
3276/27 00 08 48
31 00 00 20
3274/25 00 00 20
28 00 19 71
29 00 01 32
3273/25 00 02 06
491 00 17 55
3135/490 00 00 75
3137/490 00 04 87
3138/490 00 04 87
494 00 00 92
495 00 14 47
38 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Kokowal 476 1120 00 08 40
1108 00 09 57
1107 00 07 26
1105 00 08 47
1099 00 00 56
1098 00 00 20
1100 00 06 54
1101 00 01 15
1095 00 04 06
1094 00 02 67
1093 00 02 31
1092 00 02 18
1089 00 01 36
1088 00 02 18
5466 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1068 00 01 54
1066 00 09 48
1062 00 00 64 1067 00 00 92 1061 00 07 78 1060 00 03 35 1059 00 00 20 1058 00 00 95 1057 00 02 56 1056 00 02 20 1055 00 01 94 1036 00 05 72 1035 00 07 73 561 00 00 84 560 00 04 85 559 00 00 62 345 00 08 05 346 00 02 55 347 00 01 51 350 00 03 27 351 00 00 61 352 00 04 01 354 00 04 58 357 00 07 05 328 Rasta 00 01 03 360 00 05 100 368 00 05 52 380 Rasta 00 02 60 379 00 03 07 378 00 04 66 377 00 06 74 382 00 00 20 376 00 03 54 383 00 01 41 461 00 01 68 462 00 01 32 463-464 00 05 76 467 00 00 20 466 00 09 54 472 00 01 39 473 00 04 05 473/1 00 05 94[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5467 471 00 00 20 Rasta 00 00 88
449 00 00 54
448 00 00 46
447 00 00 20
474 00 08 36
39 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Binewal 477 60 // 9/1 00 05 27
60 // 2 00 03 77
60 // 1/2 00 08 67
60 // 1/1 00 02 47
937 Rasta 00 01 09
41 // 21/1 00 07 69
42 // 25 00 04 72
42 // 16 00 13 72
Rasta 00 00 70
42 // 17 00 00 21
42 // 15/2 00 02 01
42 // 14 00 12 54
42 // 7/3 00 04 69
42 // 7/2 00 02 02
42 // 8/2 00 00 20
42 // 8/1 00 04 15
140 Rasta 00 01 52
42 // 8/3 00 01 23
42 // 3 00 12 51
39 // 23/1 00 10 28
39 // 23/2 00 01 03
39 // 18/2 00 07 98
39 // 18/1 00 03 82
39 // 13/2 00 11 00
39 // 8/1 00 07 59
39 // 7 00 03 95
39 // 3/2 00 02 07
40 Hoshiarpur Garhshankar Majari 475 19 // 1/1/1 00 06 02
19 // 1/1/2 00 00 31
19 // 1/2/2 00 01 31
19 // 1/2/1 00 00 38
14 // 21/2 00 00 23
14 // 21/1/1/1 00 07 76
14 // 22/1 00 04 68
14 // 19/5/2 00 00 20
14 // 19/4/2 00 00 20
5468 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
14 // 19/4/1 00 00 21
14 // 19/3 00 00 92
14 // 19/2/2 00 06 94 14 // 19/2/1 00 00 20 14 // 19/1/2 00 02 83 14 // 19/1/1 00 01 71 14 // 18/3 00 02 52 14 // 12 00 01 80 14 // 13/1 00 02 78 14 // 13/2 00 02 07 14 // 13/3 00 01 73 14 // 14 00 09 17 Rasta 00 04 64 14 // 18/2 00 00 39 14 // 18/1 00 00 38 14 // 17/3 00 00 20 14 // 17/2 00 00 20 14 // 15/1 00 01 10 14 // 15/2 00 02 50 14 // 15/3 00 07 67 Rasta 00 01 14 15 // 11/2 00 12 11 15 // 12 00 11 77 15 // 13/1 00 02 06 15 // 13/2 00 08 88 Rasta 00 01 10 15 // 14/1 00 01 35 15 // 14/2 00 10 82 15 // 15 00 11 17 Rasta 00 00 86 16 // 11/1 00 04 34 16 // 11/2 00 07 70 16 // 10 00 00 20 16 // 12 00 04 60 16 // 9/2 00 00 39 16 // 9/1 00 08 49 16 // 32 00 00 77 16 // 31 00 05 40 16 // 8 00 00 20 16 // 3/2 00 02 82 16 // 3/1 00 08 76 9 // 23/2 00 05 35[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5469 9 // 24 00 06 99 9 // 17 00 00 37
174 Rasta 00 01 13
[F. No. R-25011/30/2017-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2017201720172017....————के न्(ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबA अनुसूची में वBर्णत है और िजस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्(ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Oए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Rक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वBर्णत भूमि में हितबA है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इTीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Wी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील - जगन्नाथप्रसाद | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
खइरनटि 636 00 04 55
635 00 05 55
639 00 01 09
637 00 00 10
638 00 02 04
646 00 06 89
641 00 00 20
644 00 03 12
647 00 02 07
643 00 00 23
5470 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
642 00 00 10
648 00 01 34 653 00 09 05 656 00 00 35 688 00 01 86 680 00 09 93 686 00 00 40 683 00 03 56 684 00 00 24 682 00 06 20 681 00 00 10 704 00 00 10 725 00 02 62 675 00 01 34 729 00 00 19 726 00 01 88 727 00 05 30 730 00 02 14 731 00 04 35 732 00 00 86 733 00 01 43 730/2374 00 00 58 736 00 00 15 734 00 05 68 757 00 05 83 804 00 00 54 758 00 01 81 798 00 00 16 799 00 06 82 800 00 02 32 802 00 01 89 801 00 02 96 865 00 00 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5471 866 00 04 44 588 00 03 52
867 00 02 08 871 00 00 10 876 00 02 87 877 00 02 11 898 00 00 70 900 00 06 31 904 00 00 10 903 00 00 67 899 00 00 14 901 00 00 10 902 00 07 60 541 00 00 61 542 00 00 10 540 00 04 02 539 00 07 29 536 00 01 05 538 00 01 82 537 00 03 05 527 00 00 53 528 00 02 44 528/2380 00 02 61 525 00 04 71 524 00 03 93 458 00 02 58 471 00 08 76 459 00 00 73 466 00 02 40 460 00 00 87 461 00 02 38 462 00 00 59 86 00 02 295472 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 85 00 00 87 89 00 00 10
88 00 08 03 102 00 05 65 96 00 02 88 101 00 01 51 97 00 00 45 98 00 04 12 73 00 05 56 72 00 01 41 50 00 01 55 51 00 01 17 56 00 02 66 52 00 00 16 55 00 10 75 41 00 04 29 40 00 00 84 39 00 00 15 36 00 06 04 34 00 08 82 33 00 00 20 26 00 00 47 25 00 00 78 23 00 02 40 21 00 00 50 22 00 08 52 25/2427 00 00 31 24 00 02 09 16 00 03 63 14 00 05 60 15 00 02 12 9 00 06 89 11 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5473 10 00 03 56
251 00 13 65
250 00 00 71
252 00 04 22
सुगुम 260/1058 00 02 04
259 00 04 67
255 00 05 49
258 00 12 93
256 00 00 93
257 00 01 10
270 00 08 28
275 00 00 91
276 00 09 38
278 00 03 78
302 00 02 71
301 00 03 89
300 00 03 88
299 00 03 63
295 00 07 67
298 00 00 64
297 00 00 93
296 00 00 91
339/1060 00 00 10
337 00 03 31
336 00 00 47
338 00 04 24
333 00 00 10
343 00 01 67
365 00 02 10
366 00 01 53
368 00 00 48
367 00 08 10
390 00 01 99
5474 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
357 00 00 10
391 00 11 40 90 00 13 67 89 00 00 35 55 00 03 26 87 00 11 55 59 00 03 46 64 00 04 00 74 00 00 67 66 00 07 17 65 00 02 87 69 00 03 78 71 00 00 24 70 00 03 92 474 00 02 35 473 00 04 20 469 00 06 16 468 00 02 34 471 00 00 12 470 00 01 36 478 00 05 49 527 00 01 07 526 00 00 84 525 00 07 91 530 00 01 33 522 00 12 34 566 00 04 12 518 00 04 42 515 00 00 43 516 00 00 10 517 00 00 61 567 00 10 79 571 00 07 79[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5475 572 00 00 69
बेगुिनआ िडह 970 00 00 16
971 00 05 23
972 00 05 38
973 00 00 82
939 00 02 26
986 00 04 37
987 00 00 45
988 00 04 65
985 00 06 43
989 00 00 95
984 00 00 59
1030 00 08 50
1031 00 07 88
1024 00 00 46
1032 00 01 39
1020/1184 00 00 24
1023 00 03 71
1020 00 00 43
1022 00 05 41
1018 00 07 49
1017 00 00 43
1016 00 01 15
1053 00 08 93
1054 00 03 85
1056/1191 00 00 13
1056 00 05 49
1055 00 00 99
866 00 02 23
865 00 03 73
863 00 08 94
864 00 00 20
831 00 04 92
5476 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
824 00 02 31
825 00 10 49
830 00 00 10
823 00 00 61
826 00 03 38
815 00 11 32
827 00 01 02
814 00 02 87
810 00 01 72
812 00 00 24
811 00 05 77
753 00 05 55
752 00 01 55
751 00 00 86
754 00 00 10
755 00 00 69
756 00 03 13
749 00 01 25
748 00 00 10
757 00 05 09
758 00 04 86
चढेयापल्ली 1531 00 00 73
1532 00 02 94
1535 00 00 76
1533 00 00 10
1534 00 01 07
1537 00 02 89
1536 00 04 80
1538 00 00 10
1539 00 00 10
1546 00 01 64
1556 00 00 37
1547 00 00 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5477
1555 00 03 72
1548 00 00 10
1554 00 01 21 1558 00 02 13 1553 00 06 58 1415 00 07 87 1416 00 05 90 1404 00 00 14 1395 00 05 65 1396 00 06 67 1397/11209 00 01 04 1394/11208 00 00 44 1394 00 00 19 1397 00 06 94 1398 00 02 69 1244 00 04 89 1243 00 04 67 1242 00 01 51 1241 00 07 01 2587 00 00 73 1240 00 01 89 2588 00 04 77 2589 00 00 65 2630 00 01 18 2629 00 02 01 2631 00 01 37 2632 00 02 30 2633 00 00 10 2636 00 01 21 2634 00 01 95 2635 00 01 51 2656 00 05 09 2655 00 05 365478 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2654 00 01 142659 00 03 87
2670 00 03 02 2651 00 00 10 2661 00 01 77 2665 00 01 87 2662 00 00 45 2664 00 04 23 2675 00 00 10 2663 00 03 95 2676 00 04 45 2677 00 00 19 3799 00 06 63 3798 00 01 00 3797 00 00 10 3785 00 02 73 3787 00 03 45 3786 00 03 42 3784 00 04 58 3783 00 00 10 3782 00 03 92 3781 00 02 69 3791 00 00 69 3904 00 00 10 3905 00 05 07 3906 00 04 47 3907 00 05 65 3908 00 02 14 3918 00 08 51 3919 00 00 43 3930 00 03 45 3928 00 03 62 3929 00 00 13[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5479 3927 00 03 70 3926 00 01 79
3925 00 01 69 3949 00 00 35 3950 00 00 24 3951 00 00 10 4065 00 03 60 4063 00 00 50 4064 00 01 61 4053 00 07 16 4057 00 00 66 4056 00 03 60 4152 00 01 83 4153 00 00 86 4154 00 02 30 4155 00 03 05 4187 00 06 65 4185 00 03 79 4186 00 00 56 4196 00 02 18 4492 00 01 78 4491 00 00 84 4493 00 01 43 4494 00 00 19 4508 00 01 65 4500 00 01 49 4507 00 03 01 4501 00 00 26 4505 00 00 48 4506 00 04 19 4752 00 00 82 4751 00 04 77 4754 00 06 455480 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4755 00 01 614729 00 02 01
4729/11331 00 02 52 4732 00 00 70 4731 00 00 10 4730 00 02 87 4720 00 02 21 4716 00 00 57 4719 00 03 31 4721 00 00 14 4722 00 02 11 4718 00 01 66 4698 00 00 10 4723 00 01 86 4697 00 00 10 4725 00 00 13 4724 00 01 93 4696 00 02 68 4699 00 00 10 4695 00 00 67 4694 00 00 14 5232 00 04 19 5231 00 00 76 5230 00 00 10 5234 00 00 15 5236 00 00 20 5237 00 01 48 5238 00 01 54 5239 00 03 81 5240 00 00 50 5243 00 00 10 5249 00 00 37 5250 00 00 78[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5481 5248 00 04 46 5256 00 00 36
5247 00 00 96 5257 00 08 01 5283 00 01 53 5266 00 02 23 5282 00 00 89 5281 00 04 74 5280 00 05 17 5329 00 00 10 5331 00 00 76 5332 00 04 92 5333 00 04 96 5336 00 00 31 5353 00 02 34 5409 00 00 10 5417 00 07 00 5418 00 00 93 5416 00 00 39 5419 00 06 57 5421 00 00 34 5414 00 04 74 5427 00 03 00 5429 00 00 80 5431 00 00 59 5428 00 01 40 5432 00 08 31 9199 00 00 12 9198/11256 00 01 13 9197 00 09 24 6558 00 00 94 6559 00 07 67 6562 00 03 195482 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 6566 00 08 47 6567 00 03 74
6547 00 00 13 6568 00 00 95 6546 00 01 29 6569 00 01 49 6570 00 01 80 6544 00 05 63 6545 00 00 10 6543 00 00 71 6533 00 05 80 6532 00 04 74 6576 00 00 45 6531 00 13 15 6593 00 00 99 6611 00 02 78 6594 00 02 64 6609 00 04 96 6610 00 00 67 6606 00 01 34 6605 00 00 10 6604 00 06 18 6603 00 00 57 7253 00 00 37 7255 00 03 20 7259 00 00 32 7256 00 00 68 7257 00 00 52 7258 00 02 11 7271 00 02 74 7277 00 03 47 7279 00 06 76 7276 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5483
7284 00 00 757283 00 01 05
7281 00 01 27 7282 00 01 37 7318 00 02 56 7317 00 01 69 7319 00 02 75 7320 00 02 34 7321 00 02 94 7324 00 00 22 7322 00 05 25 7323 00 01 18 7341 00 01 39 7342 00 04 89 7346 00 02 67 7347 00 04 20 7367 00 01 54 7357 00 02 46 7365 00 00 34 7358 00 02 34 7359 00 02 43 7360 00 04 09 7361 00 04 78 7447 00 05 03 7448 00 04 38 7524 00 00 90 7525 00 02 96 7525/11362 00 02 95 7526 00 01 61 7523 00 01 04 7527 00 01 31 7522 00 00 53 7561/11239 00 01 145484 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7562/11240 00 00 66187 00 00 10 जात्रा
188 00 01 49 189 00 00 91 245 00 02 00 246 00 01 18 249 00 01 41 242 00 01 57 241 00 01 60 250 00 01 53 253 00 01 62 230 00 01 21 229 00 01 39 254 00 01 23 257 00 01 36 259 00 00 75 258 00 04 57 464 00 02 31 465 00 01 01 463 00 01 39 458 00 01 38 457 00 03 24 466 00 16 24 456 00 05 99 423 00 00 56 422 00 02 19 929 00 01 61 931 00 01 01 930 00 02 56 933 00 03 79 921 00 00 24 934 00 01 92 915 00 02 76[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5485 913 00 00 10 914 00 03 69
907 00 00 72 908 00 03 63 909 00 00 93 902 00 02 20 904 00 00 13 903 00 02 25 901 00 00 10 892 00 02 05 893 00 00 10 889 00 02 68 891 00 02 20 890 00 01 41 3793 00 00 85 3794 00 15 62 3846 00 02 21 3889 00 00 10 3881 00 06 26 3883 00 01 07 3882 00 04 51 3876 00 00 10 3875 00 00 10 3870 00 02 23 3869 00 03 45 3862 00 06 51 3860 00 00 29 3861 00 03 05 3855 00 05 00 3690 00 03 21 3689 00 03 90 3686 00 03 77 3685 00 03 145486 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3684 00 02 76 3931 00 03 08
3932 00 00 22 3935 00 01 89 3930 00 00 24 3936 00 09 84 3954 00 00 12 3976 00 00 84 3976/5231 00 01 77 3938 00 01 92 3977 00 04 97 3978 00 02 72 3953 00 03 35 3979 00 04 45 4119 00 01 53 4120 00 11 82 4121 00 06 80 4124 00 06 69 4210/5015 00 00 40 4125 00 00 10 4126 00 11 32 4127 00 00 73 4177 00 00 22 4172 00 04 52 4174 00 00 19 4173 00 00 87 4171 00 01 57 4170 00 05 18 4167 00 07 10 4166 00 08 32 4165 00 05 41 4155 00 02 76 4154 00 06 14[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5487 4159 00 00 94 400 00 00 85 कु मु:िड
401 00 05 13 402/3874 00 00 12 402 00 04 44 403 00 01 74 404 00 10 66 449 00 01 75 448 00 05 15 451 00 03 63 452 00 03 07 453 00 01 64 454 00 00 83 457 00 05 28 458 00 03 44 464 00 05 80 463 00 00 63 465 00 01 45 466 00 02 71 467 00 00 10 469 00 04 73 471 00 02 54 720 00 05 31 721 00 00 48 724 00 01 15 723 00 00 10 725 00 01 64 719 00 02 92 726 00 02 31 711 00 03 06 713 00 00 27 714 00 00 13 712 00 00 395488 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
710 00 00 31709 00 00 10
708 00 01 58 707 00 01 18 706 00 00 76 705 00 00 80 704 00 00 84 703 00 01 05 702 00 00 19 701 00 00 10 694 00 03 76 693 00 01 04 692 00 00 92 691 00 01 16 1231 00 02 18 695 00 00 10 1325 00 00 44 1326 00 06 61 1327 00 03 28 1332 00 00 18 648 00 04 71 647 00 01 63 645 00 05 11 644 00 02 02 643 00 01 73 642 00 01 25 640 00 01 12 639 00 00 62 638 00 06 35 568 00 01 32 569 00 07 39 570 00 00 10 571 00 02 82[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5489 572 00 00 16 567 00 00 90
575 00 14 92
576 00 00 70
577 00 03 25
582 00 09 45
583 00 00 76
िशशु:डा 1432 00 02 31
1433 00 04 94
1434 00 00 19
1437 00 01 96
1438 00 01 41
1439 00 00 27
1436 00 01 58
1440 00 03 64
1441 00 01 67
1442 00 02 88
1511 00 00 34
1510 00 02 86
1443 00 00 17
1509 00 00 68
1508 00 05 00
1540 00 00 10
1507 00 02 23
1542 00 03 82
1559 00 02 44
1543 00 05 48
1554 00 02 74
1555 00 00 22
1553 00 11 57
1629 00 02 61
1643 00 00 10
1642 00 09 57
5490 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1641 00 00 38
1644 00 02 74
1646 00 06 76 1647 00 00 10 1649 00 01 50 1649/2999 00 01 52 1650 00 08 01 1650/2972 00 02 29 1651 00 04 77 1652 00 01 25 2629 00 01 68 1653 00 01 41 2628 00 00 92 1654 00 01 78 2318 00 12 38 2314 00 09 63 2314/2839 00 00 41 2300 00 01 41 2315 00 00 12 2313 00 01 16 2301 00 07 54 2302 00 09 44 2311 00 00 17 2303 00 05 90 2293 00 02 29 2292 00 05 36 2278 00 00 10 2279 00 04 03 2280 00 00 47 2277 00 07 81 2198 00 05 38 2197 00 00 10 2200 00 15 22[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5491
2185 00 02 622184 00 05 66
2202 00 00 24
2181 00 05 23
2182 00 00 26
2180 00 01 71
2179 00 02 01
2162 00 03 35
2163 00 12 20
2157 00 01 11
2152/2905 00 11 20
2153/2887 00 00 50
बुडु(cid:30)ंगु 1864 00 03 56
1865 00 00 10
1863 00 00 69
1859 00 02 80
1731/3080 00 01 73
1731 00 04 94
1739 00 02 52
1738 00 06 19
1737 00 01 40
1778 00 04 11
1777 00 01 90
1782 00 01 90
1767 00 00 19
1783 00 03 36
1784 00 00 73
1785 00 01 40
1786 00 09 08
1788 00 01 46
1789 00 01 14
1790 00 07 50
1790/3038 00 00 75
5492 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1647 00 02 12
1647/3184 00 01 09
1646 00 03 68 1645 00 02 87 1637 00 06 93 1638 00 01 04 1625 00 05 56 1618 00 05 15 1617 00 03 31 1619 00 02 34 1620 00 00 52 1621 00 02 58 1622 00 01 43 1616 00 02 29 1966 00 00 27 1967 00 01 19 1974 00 01 29 1975 00 03 86 1976 00 01 03 1972 00 01 19 1973 00 00 71 1971 00 01 00 1977 00 01 00 1978 00 00 10 1980 00 08 10 1990 00 00 44 1991 00 00 10 1992 00 00 10 1989 00 00 98 1988 00 01 29 2070 00 04 60 2069 00 03 80 2072 00 00 81[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5493
2073 00 01 182074 00 01 03
2075 00 00 86 2077 00 08 54 2076 00 00 20 2078 00 00 10 2085 00 00 96 2086 00 03 57 2087 00 00 59 2088 00 00 48 2084 00 03 94 2101 00 03 80 2156 00 02 04 2155 00 03 26 2157 00 03 13 2278 00 00 65 2277 00 01 67 2276 00 01 96 2275 00 00 10 2279 00 03 43 2280 00 03 20 2281 00 03 31 2282 00 04 45 2283 00 01 91 2286 00 10 29 2414 00 01 96 2462 00 04 32 2463 00 06 55 2460 00 02 75 2470 00 01 26 2468 00 01 26 2469 00 02 37 2473 00 04 305494 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2474 00 04 80 2476 00 05 08
2478 00 04 81 2479 00 02 84 2612 00 01 04 2610 00 02 14 2611 00 01 80 2604 00 02 03 2603 00 00 10 2602 00 05 62 2601 00 00 38 2625 00 08 33 2595 00 00 10 2624 00 00 24 2626 00 08 47 2627 00 05 94 2628 00 03 04 2636 00 11 48 2637 00 00 10 2635 00 06 64 2719/3041 00 02 88 2718 00 04 27 2717 00 01 84 2693 00 02 43 2692 00 04 52 2691 00 00 98 2695 00 00 63 2698 00 00 74 2697 00 01 97 2696 00 00 13 2699 00 00 24 2699/3158 00 00 65 2700 00 03 43[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5495
2701 00 01 052702 00 00 15
2810 00 02 30 2809 00 03 40 2808 00 04 37 2821 00 00 40 2802 00 47 77 2815 00 14 26 2826 00 05 90 2828 00 25 52 2829 00 21 36 23 00 22 67 23/765 00 15 08 71 00 02 53 77 00 05 01 73 00 00 10 79 00 02 41 80 00 03 43 81 00 00 65 85 00 00 10 82 00 01 64 83 00 01 94 84 00 00 89 86 00 00 35 97 00 03 78 98 00 01 39 96 00 00 95 95 00 03 61 93 00 00 30 94 00 03 73 115 00 00 76 117 00 02 90 118 00 02 725496 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 119 00 00 42 123 00 02 81
124 00 04 23 130 00 00 75 125 00 02 80 125/825 00 03 32 127/761 00 00 15 127 00 00 37 126 00 02 28 257 00 07 34 222 00 00 33 256 00 03 40 255 00 01 73 223 00 01 48 224 00 03 20 254 00 00 22 225 00 04 21 226 00 02 86 228 00 00 66 215 00 00 94 211 00 06 74 210 00 13 51 212 00 01 75 206 00 03 39 207 00 02 40 205 00 03 04 768 00 03 65 204 00 02 71 202 00 00 10 201 00 06 19 200 00 06 67 197 00 06 56 198 00 02 10 196 00 02 63
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5497
New Delhi, the 23rd August, 2017
S.O. 2017.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : JAGANNATHPRASAD | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
636 00 04 55 KHAIRANATI
635 00 05 55 639 00 01 09 637 00 00 10 638 00 02 04 646 00 06 89 641 00 00 20 644 00 03 12 647 00 02 07 643 00 00 23 642 00 00 10 648 00 01 34 653 00 09 05 656 00 00 35 688 00 01 86 680 00 09 93 686 00 00 40 683 00 03 56 684 00 00 24 682 00 06 20 681 00 00 10 704 00 00 105498 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 725 00 02 62
675 00 01 34 729 00 00 19 726 00 01 88 727 00 05 30 730 00 02 14 731 00 04 35 732 00 00 86 733 00 01 43 730/2374 00 00 58 736 00 00 15 734 00 05 68 757 00 05 83 804 00 00 54 758 00 01 81 798 00 00 16 799 00 06 82 800 00 02 32 802 00 01 89 801 00 02 96 865 00 00 83 866 00 04 44 588 00 03 52 867 00 02 08 871 00 00 10 876 00 02 87 877 00 02 11 898 00 00 70 900 00 06 31 904 00 00 10 903 00 00 67 899 00 00 14 901 00 00 10 902 00 07 60 541 00 00 61 542 00 00 10 540 00 04 02 539 00 07 29 536 00 01 05 538 00 01 82 537 00 03 05 527 00 00 53[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5499 528 00 02 44
528/2380 00 02 61 525 00 04 71 524 00 03 93 458 00 02 58 471 00 08 76 459 00 00 73 466 00 02 40 460 00 00 87 461 00 02 38 462 00 00 59 86 00 02 29 85 00 00 87 89 00 00 10 88 00 08 03 102 00 05 65 96 00 02 88 101 00 01 51 97 00 00 45 98 00 04 12 73 00 05 56 72 00 01 41 50 00 01 55 51 00 01 17 56 00 02 66 52 00 00 16 55 00 10 75 41 00 04 29 40 00 00 84 39 00 00 15 36 00 06 04 34 00 08 82 33 00 00 20 26 00 00 47 25 00 00 78 23 00 02 40 21 00 00 50 22 00 08 52 25/2427 00 00 31 24 00 02 09 16 00 03 63 14 00 05 605500 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 15 00 02 12 9 00 06 89
11 00 00 10 10 00 03 56 251 00 13 65 250 00 00 71 252 00 04 22 260/1058 00 02 04
SUGUMA
259 00 04 67 255 00 05 49 258 00 12 93 256 00 00 93 257 00 01 10 270 00 08 28 275 00 00 91 276 00 09 38 278 00 03 78 302 00 02 71 301 00 03 89 300 00 03 88 299 00 03 63 295 00 07 67 298 00 00 64 297 00 00 93 296 00 00 91 339/1060 00 00 10 337 00 03 31 336 00 00 47 338 00 04 24 333 00 00 10 343 00 01 67 365 00 02 10 366 00 01 53 368 00 00 48 367 00 08 10 390 00 01 99 357 00 00 10 391 00 11 40 90 00 13 67 89 00 00 35 55 00 03 26 87 00 11 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5501 59 00 03 46 64 00 04 00
74 00 00 67 66 00 07 17 65 00 02 87 69 00 03 78 71 00 00 24 70 00 03 92 474 00 02 35 473 00 04 20 469 00 06 16 468 00 02 34 471 00 00 12 470 00 01 36 478 00 05 49 527 00 01 07 526 00 00 84 525 00 07 91 530 00 01 33 522 00 12 34 566 00 04 12 518 00 04 42 515 00 00 43 516 00 00 10 517 00 00 61 567 00 10 79 571 00 07 79 572 00 00 69 970 00 00 16
BEGUNIA DIHA
971 00 05 23 972 00 05 38 973 00 00 82 939 00 02 26 986 00 04 37 987 00 00 45 988 00 04 65 985 00 06 43 989 00 00 95 984 00 00 59 1030 00 08 50 1031 00 07 88 1024 00 00 465502 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1032 00 01 39 1020/1184 00 00 24
1023 00 03 71 1020 00 00 43 1022 00 05 41 1018 00 07 49 1017 00 00 43 1016 00 01 15 1053 00 08 93 1054 00 03 85 1056/1191 00 00 13 1056 00 05 49 1055 00 00 99 866 00 02 23 865 00 03 73 863 00 08 94 864 00 00 20 831 00 04 92 824 00 02 31 825 00 10 49 830 00 00 10 823 00 00 61 826 00 03 38 815 00 11 32 827 00 01 02 814 00 02 87 810 00 01 72 812 00 00 24 811 00 05 77 753 00 05 55 752 00 01 55 751 00 00 86 754 00 00 10 755 00 00 69 756 00 03 13 749 00 01 25 748 00 00 10 757 00 05 09 758 00 04 86 1531 00 00 73
CHADHEIAPALLI
1532 00 02 94 1535 00 00 76[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5503 1533 00 00 10 1534 00 01 07
1537 00 02 89 1536 00 04 80 1538 00 00 10 1539 00 00 10 1546 00 01 64 1556 00 00 37 1547 00 00 87 1555 00 03 72 1548 00 00 10 1554 00 01 21 1558 00 02 13 1553 00 06 58 1415 00 07 87 1416 00 05 90 1404 00 00 14 1395 00 05 65 1396 00 06 67 1397/11209 00 01 04 1394/11208 00 00 44 1394 00 00 19 1397 00 06 94 1398 00 02 69 1244 00 04 89 1243 00 04 67 1242 00 01 51 1241 00 07 01 2587 00 00 73 1240 00 01 89 2588 00 04 77 2589 00 00 65 2630 00 01 18 2629 00 02 01 2631 00 01 37 2632 00 02 30 2633 00 00 10 2636 00 01 21 2634 00 01 95 2635 00 01 51 2656 00 05 09 2655 00 05 365504 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2654 00 01 142659 00 03 87
2670 00 03 02 2651 00 00 10 2661 00 01 77 2665 00 01 87 2662 00 00 45 2664 00 04 23 2675 00 00 10 2663 00 03 95 2676 00 04 45 2677 00 00 19 3799 00 06 63 3798 00 01 00 3797 00 00 10 3785 00 02 73 3787 00 03 45 3786 00 03 42 3784 00 04 58 3783 00 00 10 3782 00 03 92 3781 00 02 69 3791 00 00 69 3904 00 00 10 3905 00 05 07 3906 00 04 47 3907 00 05 65 3908 00 02 14 3918 00 08 51 3919 00 00 43 3930 00 03 45 3928 00 03 62 3929 00 00 13 3927 00 03 70 3926 00 01 79 3925 00 01 69 3949 00 00 35 3950 00 00 24 3951 00 00 10 4065 00 03 60 4063 00 00 50 4064 00 01 61[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5505
4053 00 07 164057 00 00 66
4056 00 03 60 4152 00 01 83 4153 00 00 86 4154 00 02 30 4155 00 03 05 4187 00 06 65 4185 00 03 79 4186 00 00 56 4196 00 02 18 4492 00 01 78 4491 00 00 84 4493 00 01 43 4494 00 00 19 4508 00 01 65 4500 00 01 49 4507 00 03 01 4501 00 00 26 4505 00 00 48 4506 00 04 19 4752 00 00 82 4751 00 04 77 4754 00 06 45 4755 00 01 61 4729 00 02 01 4729/11331 00 02 52 4732 00 00 70 4731 00 00 10 4730 00 02 87 4720 00 02 21 4716 00 00 57 4719 00 03 31 4721 00 00 14 4722 00 02 11 4718 00 01 66 4698 00 00 10 4723 00 01 86 4697 00 00 10 4725 00 00 13 4724 00 01 93 4696 00 02 685506 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4699 00 00 10 4695 00 00 67
4694 00 00 14 5232 00 04 19 5231 00 00 76 5230 00 00 10 5234 00 00 15 5236 00 00 20 5237 00 01 48 5238 00 01 54 5239 00 03 81 5240 00 00 50 5243 00 00 10 5249 00 00 37 5250 00 00 78 5248 00 04 46 5256 00 00 36 5247 00 00 96 5257 00 08 01 5283 00 01 53 5266 00 02 23 5282 00 00 89 5281 00 04 74 5280 00 05 17 5329 00 00 10 5331 00 00 76 5332 00 04 92 5333 00 04 96 5336 00 00 31 5353 00 02 34 5409 00 00 10 5417 00 07 00 5418 00 00 93 5416 00 00 39 5419 00 06 57 5421 00 00 34 5414 00 04 74 5427 00 03 00 5429 00 00 80 5431 00 00 59 5428 00 01 40 5432 00 08 31[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5507 9199 00 00 12 9198/11256 00 01 13
9197 00 09 24 6558 00 00 94 6559 00 07 67 6562 00 03 19 6566 00 08 47 6567 00 03 74 6547 00 00 13 6568 00 00 95 6546 00 01 29 6569 00 01 49 6570 00 01 80 6544 00 05 63 6545 00 00 10 6543 00 00 71 6533 00 05 80 6532 00 04 74 6576 00 00 45 6531 00 13 15 6593 00 00 99 6611 00 02 78 6594 00 02 64 6609 00 04 96 6610 00 00 67 6606 00 01 34 6605 00 00 10 6604 00 06 18 6603 00 00 57 7253 00 00 37 7255 00 03 20 7259 00 00 32 7256 00 00 68 7257 00 00 52 7258 00 02 11 7271 00 02 74 7277 00 03 47 7279 00 06 76 7276 00 00 10 7284 00 00 75 7283 00 01 05 7281 00 01 275508 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7282 00 01 377318 00 02 56
7317 00 01 69 7319 00 02 75 7320 00 02 34 7321 00 02 94 7324 00 00 22 7322 00 05 25 7323 00 01 18 7341 00 01 39 7342 00 04 89 7346 00 02 67 7347 00 04 20 7367 00 01 54 7357 00 02 46 7365 00 00 34 7358 00 02 34 7359 00 02 43 7360 00 04 09 7361 00 04 78 7447 00 05 03 7448 00 04 38 7524 00 00 90 7525 00 02 96 7525/11362 00 02 95 7526 00 01 61 7523 00 01 04 7527 00 01 31 7522 00 00 53 7561/11239 00 01 14 7562/11240 00 00 66 187 00 00 10
JATRA
188 00 01 49 189 00 00 91 245 00 02 00 246 00 01 18 249 00 01 41 242 00 01 57 241 00 01 60 250 00 01 53 253 00 01 62 230 00 01 21[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5509
229 00 01 39254 00 01 23
257 00 01 36 259 00 00 75 258 00 04 57 464 00 02 31 465 00 01 01 463 00 01 39 458 00 01 38 457 00 03 24 466 00 16 24 456 00 05 99 423 00 00 56 422 00 02 19 929 00 01 61 931 00 01 01 930 00 02 56 933 00 03 79 921 00 00 24 934 00 01 92 915 00 02 76 913 00 00 10 914 00 03 69 907 00 00 72 908 00 03 63 909 00 00 93 902 00 02 20 904 00 00 13 903 00 02 25 901 00 00 10 892 00 02 05 893 00 00 10 889 00 02 68 891 00 02 20 890 00 01 41 3793 00 00 85 3794 00 15 62 3846 00 02 21 3889 00 00 10 3881 00 06 26 3883 00 01 07 3882 00 04 515510 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3876 00 00 10 3875 00 00 10
3870 00 02 23 3869 00 03 45 3862 00 06 51 3860 00 00 29 3861 00 03 05 3855 00 05 00 3690 00 03 21 3689 00 03 90 3686 00 03 77 3685 00 03 14 3684 00 02 76 3931 00 03 08 3932 00 00 22 3935 00 01 89 3930 00 00 24 3936 00 09 84 3954 00 00 12 3976 00 00 84 3976/5231 00 01 77 3938 00 01 92 3977 00 04 97 3978 00 02 72 3953 00 03 35 3979 00 04 45 4119 00 01 53 4120 00 11 82 4121 00 06 80 4124 00 06 69 4210/5015 00 00 40 4125 00 00 10 4126 00 11 32 4127 00 00 73 4177 00 00 22 4172 00 04 52 4174 00 00 19 4173 00 00 87 4171 00 01 57 4170 00 05 18 4167 00 07 10 4166 00 08 32[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5511
4165 00 05 41 4155 00 02 76 4154 00 06 14 4159 00 00 94 400 00 00 85
KUMUNDI
401 00 05 13 402/3874 00 00 12 402 00 04 44 403 00 01 74 404 00 10 66 449 00 01 75 448 00 05 15 451 00 03 63 452 00 03 07 453 00 01 64 454 00 00 83 457 00 05 28 458 00 03 44 464 00 05 80 463 00 00 63 465 00 01 45 466 00 02 71 467 00 00 10 469 00 04 73 471 00 02 54 720 00 05 31 721 00 00 48 724 00 01 15 723 00 00 10 725 00 01 64 719 00 02 92 726 00 02 31 711 00 03 06 713 00 00 27 714 00 00 13 712 00 00 39 710 00 00 31 709 00 00 10 708 00 01 58 707 00 01 18 706 00 00 76 705 00 00 805512 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
704 00 00 84 703 00 01 05 702 00 00 19 701 00 00 10 694 00 03 76 693 00 01 04 692 00 00 92 691 00 01 16 1231 00 02 18 695 00 00 10 1325 00 00 44 1326 00 06 61 1327 00 03 28 1332 00 00 18 648 00 04 71 647 00 01 63 645 00 05 11 644 00 02 02 643 00 01 73 642 00 01 25 640 00 01 12 639 00 00 62 638 00 06 35 568 00 01 32 569 00 07 39 570 00 00 10 571 00 02 82 572 00 00 16 567 00 00 90 575 00 14 92 576 00 00 70 577 00 03 25 582 00 09 45 583 00 00 76 1432 00 02 31
SISUNDA
1433 00 04 94 1434 00 00 19 1437 00 01 96 1438 00 01 41 1439 00 00 27 1436 00 01 58 1440 00 03 64[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5513 1441 00 01 67 1442 00 02 88
1511 00 00 34 1510 00 02 86 1443 00 00 17 1509 00 00 68 1508 00 05 00 1540 00 00 10 1507 00 02 23 1542 00 03 82 1559 00 02 44 1543 00 05 48 1554 00 02 74 1555 00 00 22 1553 00 11 57 1629 00 02 61 1643 00 00 10 1642 00 09 57 1641 00 00 38 1644 00 02 74 1646 00 06 76 1647 00 00 10 1649 00 01 50 1649/2999 00 01 52 1650 00 08 01 1650/2972 00 02 29 1651 00 04 77 1652 00 01 25 2629 00 01 68 1653 00 01 41 2628 00 00 92 1654 00 01 78 2318 00 12 38 2314 00 09 63 2314/2839 00 00 41 2300 00 01 41 2315 00 00 12 2313 00 01 16 2301 00 07 54 2302 00 09 44 2311 00 00 17 2303 00 05 905514 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2293 00 02 29 2292 00 05 36
2278 00 00 10 2279 00 04 03 2280 00 00 47 2277 00 07 81 2198 00 05 38 2197 00 00 10 2200 00 15 22 2185 00 02 62 2184 00 05 66 2202 00 00 24 2181 00 05 23 2182 00 00 26 2180 00 01 71 2179 00 02 01 2162 00 03 35 2163 00 12 20 2157 00 01 11 2152/2905 00 11 20 2153/2887 00 00 50 1864 00 03 56
BUDURUNGU
1865 00 00 10 1863 00 00 69 1859 00 02 80 1731/3080 00 01 73 1731 00 04 94 1739 00 02 52 1738 00 06 19 1737 00 01 40 1778 00 04 11 1777 00 01 90 1782 00 01 90 1767 00 00 19 1783 00 03 36 1784 00 00 73 1785 00 01 40 1786 00 09 08 1788 00 01 46 1789 00 01 14 1790 00 07 50 1790/3038 00 00 75[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5515 1647 00 02 12 1647/3184 00 01 09
1646 00 03 68 1645 00 02 87 1637 00 06 93 1638 00 01 04 1625 00 05 56 1618 00 05 15 1617 00 03 31 1619 00 02 34 1620 00 00 52 1621 00 02 58 1622 00 01 43 1616 00 02 29 1966 00 00 27 1967 00 01 19 1974 00 01 29 1975 00 03 86 1976 00 01 03 1972 00 01 19 1973 00 00 71 1971 00 01 00 1977 00 01 00 1978 00 00 10 1980 00 08 10 1990 00 00 44 1991 00 00 10 1992 00 00 10 1989 00 00 98 1988 00 01 29 2070 00 04 60 2069 00 03 80 2072 00 00 81 2073 00 01 18 2074 00 01 03 2075 00 00 86 2077 00 08 54 2076 00 00 20 2078 00 00 10 2085 00 00 96 2086 00 03 57 2087 00 00 595516 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2088 00 00 48
2084 00 03 94 2101 00 03 80 2156 00 02 04 2155 00 03 26 2157 00 03 13 2278 00 00 65 2277 00 01 67 2276 00 01 96 2275 00 00 10 2279 00 03 43 2280 00 03 20 2281 00 03 31 2282 00 04 45 2283 00 01 91 2286 00 10 29 2414 00 01 96 2462 00 04 32 2463 00 06 55 2460 00 02 75 2470 00 01 26 2468 00 01 26 2469 00 02 37 2473 00 04 30 2474 00 04 80 2476 00 05 08 2478 00 04 81 2479 00 02 84 2612 00 01 04 2610 00 02 14 2611 00 01 80 2604 00 02 03 2603 00 00 10 2602 00 05 62 2601 00 00 38 2625 00 08 33 2595 00 00 10 2624 00 00 24 2626 00 08 47 2627 00 05 94 2628 00 03 04 2636 00 11 48[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5517 2637 00 00 10 2635 00 06 64
2719/3041 00 02 88 2718 00 04 27 2717 00 01 84 2693 00 02 43 2692 00 04 52 2691 00 00 98 2695 00 00 63 2698 00 00 74 2697 00 01 97 2696 00 00 13 2699 00 00 24 2699/3158 00 00 65 2700 00 03 43 2701 00 01 05 2702 00 00 15 2810 00 02 30 2809 00 03 40 2808 00 04 37 2821 00 00 40 2802 00 47 77 2815 00 14 26 2826 00 05 90 2828 00 25 52 2829 00 21 36 23 00 22 67
KARADAPALLI
23/765 00 15 08 71 00 02 53 77 00 05 01 73 00 00 10 79 00 02 41 80 00 03 43 81 00 00 65 85 00 00 10 82 00 01 64 83 00 01 94 84 00 00 89 86 00 00 35 97 00 03 78 98 00 01 39 96 00 00 955518 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 95 00 03 61 93 00 00 30 94 00 03 73
115 00 00 76 117 00 02 90 118 00 02 72 119 00 00 42 123 00 02 81 124 00 04 23 130 00 00 75 125 00 02 80 125/825 00 03 32 127/761 00 00 15 127 00 00 37 126 00 02 28 257 00 07 34 222 00 00 33 256 00 03 40 255 00 01 73 223 00 01 48 224 00 03 20 254 00 00 22 225 00 04 21 226 00 02 86 228 00 00 66 215 00 00 94 211 00 06 74 210 00 13 51 212 00 01 75 206 00 03 39 207 00 02 40 205 00 03 04 768 00 03 65 204 00 02 71 202 00 00 10 201 00 06 19 200 00 06 67 197 00 06 56 198 00 02 10 196 00 02 63
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5519नई दिल्ली, 23 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2018201820182018....————के न्(ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबA अनुसूची में वBर्णत है और िजस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्(ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Oए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Rक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वBर्णत भूमि में हितबA है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इTीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Wी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील - पोलसरा | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य - ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
लिछपुर 1 00 00 10
5 00 00 61
6 00 03 90
328 00 00 22
327 00 00 58
326 00 01 04
325 00 02 17
324 00 01 92
322 00 01 91
323 00 01 73
323/1652 00 01 73
336 00 01 57
337 00 02 81
338 00 01 49
5520 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
339 00 01 62
340 00 01 86 341 00 01 87 342 00 01 66 343 00 02 85 646 00 01 73 648 00 00 10 647 00 01 66 645 00 01 84 674 00 02 57 644 00 00 87 675 00 02 20 676 00 04 37 677 00 04 07 680 00 01 04 679 00 01 95 1059 00 02 40 1060 00 03 50 1061 00 05 89 1071 00 00 72 1062 00 01 83 1069 00 00 10 1068 00 02 20 1066 00 01 16 1065 00 00 10 1067 00 03 46 1051 00 00 72 1050 00 03 51 1049 00 05 60 1103 00 00 33[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5521 1104 00 00 10 1048 00 02 10
1047 00 00 51
1046 00 05 63
1035 00 00 33
1036 00 03 09
1037 00 00 38
1021 00 00 10
1028 00 01 84
1026 00 01 39
1027 00 04 79
कणछाइ 2634 00 00 10
2635 00 02 25
2639 00 00 12
2638 00 00 43
2637 00 01 36
2636 00 01 41
2625 00 06 89
2624 00 02 65
2623 00 04 18
2654 00 00 10
2655 00 01 04
2622 00 00 67
2656 00 04 78
2797 00 03 40
2657 00 01 43
2796 00 02 57
2660 00 00 42
2793 00 03 79
2795 00 00 76
5522 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2794 00 05 72
2802 00 00 18
2790 00 03 50 2789 00 03 82 2788 00 00 51 2786 00 01 47 2785 00 01 36 2787 00 03 17 2784 00 09 78 2782 00 00 55 2783 00 09 47 5112 00 01 13 5113 00 03 95 5114 00 04 18 5111 00 00 80 5110 00 00 21 5115 00 03 59 5116 00 09 01 5117 00 00 82 5118 00 00 52 5092 00 03 87 5091 00 00 44 5066 00 00 81 5064 00 15 51 4995 00 09 33 4996/6015 00 01 89 4998 00 05 56 5004 00 01 55 5005 00 02 30 5002 00 02 16[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5523 5003 00 07 98 5006 00 01 93
4962 00 03 79
4964 00 03 17
4966 00 03 33
4972 00 05 74
4973 00 01 63
4971 00 01 03
5637 00 04 61
5638 00 01 36
5645 00 01 33
5636 00 00 45
5646 00 03 95
5647 00 03 66
5648 00 00 10
5629 00 01 10
5649 00 01 12
5650 00 03 06
5656 00 03 52
गरेइझुिल 1519 00 02 54
1518 00 02 38
1520 00 01 89
1517 00 04 40
1517/4335 00 01 47
1521 00 05 15
1494 00 02 34
1493 00 00 89
1492 00 03 10
1491 00 03 00
1490 00 00 70
5524 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1535 00 03 90
1533 00 05 28
1534 00 01 88 1532 00 09 76 1735 00 00 62 1657 00 00 96 1658 00 04 26 1656 00 00 41 1659 00 03 16 1660 00 01 02 1661 00 04 90 1705 00 00 16 1704 00 00 89 1703 00 01 14 1702 00 02 43 1701 00 03 37 1700 00 00 74 1692 00 01 86 1693 00 00 10 1694 00 03 64 1681 00 00 40 2853 00 11 51 2849 00 00 32 2848 00 01 65 2847 00 01 69 2201 00 00 13 2846 00 00 35 2845 00 04 99 2844 00 02 02 2203 00 00 12[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5525 2843 00 00 10 2840 00 00 22
2841 00 01 36 2842 00 00 10 2844 00 02 02 2834 00 00 64 2356 00 00 60 2358 00 02 25 2357 00 00 61 2359 00 02 46 2361 00 04 38 2365 00 00 19 2364 00 00 76 2363 00 03 19 2362 00 00 10 2393 00 00 19 2392 00 00 14 2391 00 01 39 2390 00 01 07 2378 00 00 30 2379 00 00 76 2389 00 01 86 2388 00 00 53 2380 00 02 36 2383 00 01 15 2382 00 01 47 2381 00 00 61 2384 00 00 51 2385 00 01 59 2769 00 00 885526 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2386 00 01 342407 00 03 24
2768 00 00 34 2767 00 00 61 2766 00 00 82 2765 00 00 15 2408 00 03 86 2409 00 03 51 2410 00 01 37 2411 00 00 62 2412 00 01 84 2464 00 00 24 2463 00 02 02 2462 00 00 84 2474 00 01 88 2475 00 01 86 2476 00 01 08 2472 00 02 21 2473 00 01 04 2471 00 02 97 2477 00 02 02 2691 00 02 53 2654 00 01 01 2653 00 03 21 2652 00 00 25 2656 00 00 47 2657 00 03 14 2658 00 02 26 2648 00 00 75 2659 00 01 35[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5527 2612 00 01 20 2647 00 03 29
2646 00 00 10 2613 00 03 65 2614 00 00 44 2633 00 00 94 2626 00 05 88 2627 00 00 24 2552 00 01 49 2554 00 03 27 2555 00 05 93 2556 00 01 42 2557 00 03 52 2590 00 05 52 2584 00 00 75 2583 00 01 48 2582 00 06 14 2585 00 02 30 2581 00 02 31 4144 00 00 54 4145 00 00 88 4146 00 00 13 4147 00 08 29 4148 00 00 13 4149 00 01 81 4150 00 00 10 4151 00 00 76 4152 00 02 16 4153 00 01 60 4154 00 00 635528 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4168 00 02 93 4167 00 00 14
4166 00 00 10
4169 00 00 89
4165 00 01 27
4170 00 09 29
4171 00 00 10
4261 00 00 89
4260 00 05 49
4270 00 05 94
4271 00 11 53
4290 00 11 50
4291 00 01 69
4299 00 02 51
4300 00 01 61
4297 00 00 17
4298 00 03 49
4301 00 01 09
हातिपाद पाल्लि 1820 00 00 10
1845 00 01 08
1848 00 02 09
1849 00 01 55
1847 00 01 26
1850 00 00 89
1851 00 00 57
1852 00 00 16
1853 00 02 37
1854 00 02 19
1858 00 00 43
1857 00 00 54
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5529
1856 00 03 391876 00 00 10
1875 00 02 40 1874 00 00 22 1888 00 00 64 1887 00 00 55 1889 00 00 72 1890 00 00 87 1892 00 01 47 1891 00 04 22 1897 00 01 18 1896 00 04 16 1938 00 01 06 1941 00 00 10 1940 00 02 05 1939 00 00 14 1952 00 07 13 1953 00 00 12 3427 00 00 74 3426 00 00 62 3425 00 00 13 3424 00 00 10 3423 00 00 60 3429 00 03 77 3422 00 03 33 3436 00 00 33 3437 00 04 48 3421 00 00 11 3419 00 00 96 3419/3609 00 00 495530 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3418 00 02 52
3438 00 01 44 3443 00 01 87 3442 00 01 54 3441 00 00 10 3451 00 00 76 3450 00 01 35 3449 00 00 90 3452 00 02 72 3453 00 01 37 3454 00 01 70 3455 00 00 10 3518 00 03 03 3517 00 00 10 3520 00 09 16 3521 00 00 49 3542 00 01 31 3522 00 00 95 3523 00 00 15 3541 00 00 74 3524 00 00 93 3540 00 00 39 3525 00 01 69 3539 00 00 10 3526 00 01 39 3509 00 00 51 3527 00 01 13 3528 00 00 27 3529 00 00 10 3503 00 04 49[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5531 3504 00 00 10 3502 00 02 33
3501 00 00 78
3493 00 11 98
3492 00 02 26
3583 00 00 40
3491 00 05 50
के न्दुबाड़ि 1638 00 05 67
1640 00 02 15
1642 00 02 22
1639 00 00 63
1641 00 01 81
1849 00 00 10
1853 00 00 10
1848 00 00 10
1850 00 03 18
1851 00 01 45
1852 00 00 94
1844 00 01 86
1845 00 00 69
1846 00 02 61
1847 00 00 25
1842 00 00 41
1843 00 01 68
1841 00 02 42
1864 00 03 19
1869 00 01 66
1840 00 06 02
1880 00 02 29
1879 00 04 83
5532 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1878 00 01 21 1875 00 00 18 1877 00 00 20 1876 00 04 85 1940 00 00 21 1936 00 03 36 1939 00 02 60 1937 00 01 73 1938 00 01 44 1944 00 00 85 1943 00 01 35 1951 00 01 80 1950 00 00 30 1952 00 01 77 1953 00 01 69 1956 00 01 72 1954 00 01 13 1955 00 03 95 1793 00 04 70 1792 00 05 49 2903 00 00 31 3161 00 01 69 2902 00 02 32 2906 00 03 17 2911 00 00 13 2900 00 00 15 2910 00 00 69 2909 00 01 42 2907 00 01 12 2933 00 00 48[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5533 2908 00 02 90 2889 00 01 94
2890 00 03 02 2938 00 01 54 2935 00 01 40 2934 00 00 10 2943 00 00 56 2937 00 03 38 2936 00 00 10 2946 00 01 75 2941 00 00 10 2942 00 03 47 2947 00 02 23 2998 00 01 01 2997 00 09 60 2995 00 04 66 2994 00 04 59 2996 00 00 10 2991 00 03 54 2992 00 01 65 2993 00 00 10 2983 00 00 62 2985 00 12 39 2990 00 00 44 2986 00 02 37 2982 00 00 10 2978 00 00 88 2979 00 03 06 2980 00 00 64 2976 00 00 125534 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2977 00 00 673716 00 02 36
3726 00 02 18 2970 00 01 85 3717 00 00 46 3727 00 01 45 2969 00 02 98 3718 00 00 37 3719 00 00 85 3720 00 01 27 3722 00 02 43 3721 00 02 36 3724 00 00 31 3723 00 02 35 3726 00 02 18 3728 00 01 24 3729 00 02 91 3731 00 02 77 3730 00 00 50 3732 00 00 85 7314 00 01 43 7316 00 03 18 7317 00 00 22 7318 00 01 59 7319 00 02 02 7329 00 01 05 7330 00 02 40 7332 00 00 76 7331 00 01 58 7333 00 01 71[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5535 7337 00 00 36 7335 00 02 24
7336 00 01 69 7334 00 00 23 7341 00 07 03 7293 00 00 83 7292 00 03 36 7289 00 01 80 7282 00 05 22 7288 00 00 48 7283 00 00 38 7279 00 00 76 7281 00 01 25 7280 00 02 48 7245 00 03 44 7018 00 07 60 7243 00 01 82 7242 00 00 56 6890 00 00 34 6889 00 01 06 7227 00 00 36 7226 00 00 06 7018 00 07 60 6890 00 00 33 6889 00 01 06 7217 00 11 49 7185 00 02 03 7184 00 03 39 7183 00 02 83 7182 00 03 415536 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7181 00 01 51 7180 00 02 03 7179 00 01 52 7175 00 00 97 7178 00 00 10 7174 00 00 71 7130 00 05 31 7129 00 00 18 7022 00 01 45 7023 00 05 53 7127 00 02 11 7024 00 00 50 7128 00 01 23 7125 00 01 31 7126 00 00 20 7116 00 00 17 7117 00 03 26 7118 00 00 64 7114 00 04 58 7113 00 00 10 7111 00 00 10 7112 00 05 50 7108 00 02 71 7099 00 04 95 7100 00 00 95 7098 00 00 64 7097 00 07 12 7093 00 05 32 7092 00 03 20 7091 00 03 35[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5537 6499 00 00 10
6495 00 01 16
6496 00 05 59
6497 00 00 10
6494 00 00 10
मन्दार 595 00 06 58
594 00 57 40
646 00 00 34
642 00 16 35
643 00 04 44
638 00 16 57
640 00 07 94
639 00 07 13
657 00 24 82
658 00 09 19
675 00 04 95
665 00 18 89
1092 00 09 21
1142 00 04 27
1143 00 00 10
1144 00 10 69
1145 00 16 20
1148 00 27 76
1153 00 14 66
1218 00 00 12
1219 00 04 01
1220 00 04 57
1221 00 06 48
1221/8269 00 05 83
1222 00 06 07
5538 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1213 00 02 56
1166 00 02 98
1165 00 08 84 1167 00 00 10 1171 00 01 98 1172 00 06 62 1173 00 07 10 1174 00 07 91 1177 00 07 94 1186 00 01 24 1184 00 09 97 1184/8254 00 00 10 1183 00 04 60 4045/8354 00 00 10 1182 00 08 11 7543 00 00 57 7544 00 04 43 7545 00 01 44 7549 00 06 97 7539 00 02 98 7540 00 05 32 7527 00 00 55 7528 00 06 00 7524 00 02 99 7525 00 00 19 7523 00 04 83 7459 00 00 79 7458 00 00 10 7522 00 00 47 7472 00 03 70[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5539 7519 00 00 10 7471 00 00 48
7474 00 00 83 7473 00 03 07 7475 00 01 55 7476 00 02 16 7477 00 01 05 7513 00 00 10 7482 00 03 18 7512 00 00 43 7511 00 00 45 7510 00 00 72 7483 00 04 87 7484 00 01 85 7494 00 08 25 7493 00 00 17 7495 00 00 14 7282 00 02 11 7281 00 01 18 7280 00 00 91 7230 00 05 45 7231 00 02 13 7232 00 03 29 7233 00 03 80 7234 00 00 51 7214 00 12 90 7239 00 00 10 7213 00 03 04 7212 00 06 17 5429 00 04 315540 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5430 00 03 03 5431 00 02 58
5436 00 05 34 5437 00 08 02 5438 00 03 15 5439 00 04 43 5380 00 03 03 5379 00 01 53 5379/8098 00 01 93 5378 00 06 81 5377 00 03 65 5349 00 00 96 5375 00 03 58 5350 00 02 32 5352 00 05 46 5354 00 02 57 5353 00 00 95 5351 00 00 12 5294/8151 00 00 10 5355 00 01 84 5267 00 06 59 5268 00 02 35 5263 00 01 45 5262 00 04 51 5264 00 00 10 5265 00 00 28 5261 00 04 19 5260 00 05 06 5259 00 00 39 5254 00 00 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5541
5258 00 01 455255 00 00 10
5257 00 01 95
5237 00 00 19
5238 00 00 73
5256 00 00 95
5239 00 01 72
5240 00 02 23
5241 00 02 18
5242 00 02 08
5244 00 00 10
5243 00 02 68
5227 00 02 16
5228 00 01 09
5225 00 01 49
5224 00 00 60
5226 00 04 46
5221 00 00 90
5220 00 06 03
5222 00 00 10
5214 00 00 10
5213 00 00 37
5212 00 01 80
5211 00 04 58
5210 00 05 77
eमागड़ 1370 00 03 33
1369 00 08 21
1021 00 01 34
1022 00 01 57
1023 00 01 08
5542 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1366 00 00 981028 00 01 29
1027 00 08 96 1034 00 07 29 1035 00 00 10 1036 00 01 85 1037 00 02 12 1038 00 00 58 1044 00 02 79 1043 00 07 45 1045 00 03 99 1064 00 00 10 1065 00 04 18 1085 00 00 26 1080 00 01 12 1073 00 00 57 1074 00 04 32 1075 00 04 67 1076 00 05 43 1071 00 02 38 1070 00 00 10 1150 00 06 34 1151 00 03 83 1010 00 02 82 1009 00 00 31 1008 00 02 97 1007 00 03 04 841 00 03 81 842 00 00 10 856 00 05 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5543
857 00 00 46 858 00 06 07 872 00 09 36 871 00 03 13 877 00 01 07 870 00 00 29 887 00 04 34 878 00 00 25 886 00 03 87 885 00 03 19 888 00 00 07 884 00 00 35 957 00 01 38 958/7150 00 01 61 958/7151 00 02 13 958 00 03 19 958/7152 00 02 84 955 00 00 55 952 00 02 83 959 00 00 10 953 00 00 14 951 00 06 32 942 00 00 24 4519 00 07 88 4521 00 00 23 4520 00 04 78 4539 00 02 18 4540 00 01 10 4541 00 00 10 4538 00 06 725544 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4561 00 01 05 4562 00 00 57
4561/7303 00 03 83 4584 00 00 41 4583 00 00 19 4578 00 02 92 4580 00 01 68 4581 00 02 05 4607 00 02 99 4611 00 02 77 4612 00 02 09 4613 00 01 72 4629 00 02 60 4630/7251 00 02 43 4630 00 04 23 4631 00 01 37 4627 00 02 63 4628 00 00 10 4671 00 01 56 5295 00 02 41 5296 00 04 52 5292 00 04 50 5300 00 11 67 5301 00 00 36 5314 00 00 37 5315 00 02 16 5309 00 00 50 5325 00 04 67 5342 00 01 51 5343 00 01 91[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5545
5347 00 01 405348 00 03 07
5357 00 05 03
5359 00 07 35
5377 00 03 99
5378 00 00 12
5403 00 00 10
5407 00 02 54
5404 00 01 32
5408 00 05 70
5409 00 00 11
5417 00 00 84
5418 00 03 23
5416 00 00 53
5427 00 02 30
5428 00 02 77
5452 00 00 15
5453 00 04 08
5454 00 03 21
5461 00 00 10
5462 00 01 72
5463 00 02 68
5505 00 02 12
5506 00 01 76
5501 00 02 57
5502 00 01 21
5500 00 03 91
भटखिल 1497 00 03 14
1490 00 02 46
1503 00 01 62
5546 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1489 00 01 611488 00 03 54
1524 00 07 14 1523 00 01 68 1531 00 03 00 1520 00 04 69 1532 00 00 10 1519 00 03 29 1550 00 07 03 1551 00 03 48 1420 00 07 02 1419 00 09 32 1418 00 00 40 1555 00 10 97 1559 00 06 00 1562 00 07 18 1567 00 04 74 1568/6397 00 04 39 1568 00 05 14 1581 00 01 34 1584 00 04 83 1586 00 00 86 1585 00 02 30 1606 00 01 48 1607 00 03 51 1605 00 00 59 1608 00 02 28 1609 00 02 91 1604 00 00 19 1618 00 00 30[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5547
1610 00 04 131617 00 00 10
1615 00 00 14 1611 00 03 62 1612 00 03 42 1613 00 02 44 1614 00 00 99 1643 00 00 39 1644 00 01 57 1645 00 03 97 1646 00 00 46 1660 00 01 44 1659 00 03 54 1640 00 01 68 1661 00 06 56 1688 00 12 01 1687 00 04 07 1686 00 03 84 1672 00 00 72 1673 00 02 16 1675 00 00 21 1676 00 05 27 1677 00 03 89 1678 00 05 23 2861 00 02 33 2957 00 00 51 2959 00 02 25 2958 00 05 70 2976 00 00 88 2981 00 01 825548 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2977 00 02 10 2979 00 01 20
2980 00 01 64 2985 00 02 16 2986 00 01 65 2987 00 04 02 2991 00 00 10 2990 00 05 80 2989 00 00 10 2995 00 04 55 2992 00 00 66 2994 00 00 10 3043 00 01 59 3042 00 02 81 3041 00 02 35 3011 00 02 45 3010 00 00 74 3009 00 00 13 3012 00 01 99 3014 00 00 10 3007 00 00 95 3013 00 04 17 3016 00 00 10 3017 00 08 03 5781 00 03 85 3018 00 01 17 5780 00 00 46 5777 00 02 57 5778 00 03 52 5855 00 03 36[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5549
5854 00 04 325853 00 00 10
5849 00 00 10 5850 00 03 43 5851 00 00 79 5847 00 04 53 5846 00 03 90 5865 00 00 52 5866 00 04 16 5867 00 00 51 5868 00 03 74 5869 00 00 10 5885 00 00 17 5884 00 03 58 5887 00 04 78 5888 00 01 30 5889 00 00 62 5890 00 00 10 5925 00 03 02 5931 00 00 24 5994 00 00 47 5993 00 07 00 5995 00 02 95 5992 00 00 46 5991 00 06 25 5990 00 00 74 5979 00 04 66 5989 00 02 75 5988 00 00 35 5980 00 01 505550 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5987 00 02 53
5986 00 01 83
5982 00 00 10
5983 00 01 23
5984 00 00 84
5985 00 00 67
6014 00 10 14
6069 00 00 84
6068 00 05 07
6066 00 07 79
6066/6424 00 00 10
6067 00 00 37
6064 00 00 14
6130 00 00 13
6131 00 08 95
6132 00 01 04
6133 00 08 20
6230 00 07 08
6232 00 00 10
6231 00 04 47
6236 00 00 43
6229 00 02 24
6227 00 05 12
6282 00 00 10
6284 00 08 13
6283 00 05 34
6281 00 03 37
6287 00 01 15
6280 00 06 30
डु ंगुरि 874 00 02 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5551
875 00 02 39876 00 00 36
877 00 07 47 961 00 04 25 962 00 01 75 963 00 00 10 955 00 01 88 954 00 00 87 953 00 00 82 964 00 04 32 965 00 00 14 966 00 02 51 967 00 00 20 975 00 02 74 976 00 01 33 974 00 00 47 977 00 02 93 973 00 00 20 979 00 00 99 980 00 01 94 1109 00 01 29 1110 00 01 31 1104 00 02 09 1101 00 00 53 1130 00 01 50 1131 00 01 93 1132 00 00 10 1133 00 00 36 1134 00 01 88 1099 00 01 465552 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1095 00 02 001096 00 00 56
1094 00 00 16 1091 00 02 64 1086 00 00 93 1087 00 01 45 1088 00 00 20 1084 00 00 75 1085 00 01 72 1081 00 00 99 1502 00 00 10 1504 00 01 43 1508 00 00 65 1506 00 00 91 1503 00 01 26 1486 00 01 24 1487 00 02 13 1488 00 00 10 1483 00 03 44 1484 00 03 38 1478 00 00 53 1479 00 06 06 1480 00 00 10 1472 00 02 58 1471 00 00 72 1469 00 00 18 1468 00 01 73 1467 00 00 91 1466 00 01 20 1465 00 02 25[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5553 1463 00 02 84 1460 00 00 10
1462 00 00 33 1451 00 00 11 1452 00 00 94 1453 00 01 40 1454 00 00 10 2664 00 00 54 2665 00 01 83 2666 00 00 65 2667 00 00 10 2668 00 03 84 2669 00 00 59 2670 00 02 06 2671 00 01 30 2672 00 00 10 2680 00 00 10 2681 00 00 33 2650 00 00 62 2651 00 02 86 2635 00 00 76 2636 00 01 40 2637 00 01 16 2638 00 01 23 2624 00 00 87 2625 00 02 22 2626 00 00 18 2614 00 00 89 2615 00 03 29 2616 00 00 195554 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2604 00 02 64 2601 00 02 03
2600 00 00 60 2594 00 03 60 2593 00 00 10 2591 00 00 97 2592 00 02 53 2841 00 00 60 2842 00 02 30 2866 00 02 03 2867 00 01 60 2875 00 00 18 2876 00 01 26 2877 00 02 95 2878 00 01 42 2879 00 04 76 2938 00 00 21 2939 00 00 30 2940 00 00 64 2941 00 02 46 2942 00 02 09 2955 00 04 14 2954 00 05 34 2992 00 02 43 2993 00 00 55 3001 00 03 07 3002 00 02 91 2991 00 07 18 2989 00 01 05 2988 00 01 85[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5555
3046 00 00 693043 00 02 15
3044 00 01 76
3045 00 01 62
3046 00 00 69
3081 00 03 24
3082 00 03 06
बािलछाइ 256 00 01 17
257 00 11 57
255 00 00 63
260 00 01 20
261 00 01 13
262 00 00 42
241 00 01 10
242 00 04 09
232 00 00 10
234 00 04 03
235 00 00 20
236 00 00 10
222 00 06 08
214 00 00 10
215 00 03 19
216 00 00 93
217 00 00 10
212 00 00 10
183 00 03 64
182 00 04 55
187 00 00 28
184 00 00 10
172 00 03 38
5556 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
173 00 02 03
171 00 04 94
162 00 00 62 164 00 00 28 165 00 09 47 145 00 05 43 146 00 00 75 127 00 01 00 127/3369 00 00 98 128 00 00 55 135 00 01 78 134 00 02 97 133 00 02 90 131 00 03 19 2143 00 01 87 2144 00 05 91 2145 00 00 13 2151 00 00 28 2152 00 00 50 2153 00 02 73 2137 00 04 38 2138 00 00 36 2154 00 00 99 2155 00 04 99 2156 00 00 62 2157 00 00 11 2188 00 00 92 2189 00 03 06 2191 00 00 87 2187 00 02 64[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5557 2186 00 00 68 2220 00 02 24
2221 00 14 30 2219 00 00 49 2216 00 02 47 2228 00 00 11 2229 00 00 49 2232 00 05 22 2231 00 04 17 2233 00 00 10 2239 00 00 60 2242 00 02 00 2243 00 01 47 2244 00 01 72 2241 00 02 50 2380 00 00 56 2346 00 01 47 2349 00 03 14 2350 00 04 76 2348 00 00 86 2351 00 02 68 2352 00 02 78 2355 00 00 89 2356 00 00 84 2357 00 00 21 2449 00 01 93 2447 00 01 41
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव5558 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 23rd August, 2017
S.O. 2018.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : POLASARA | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
LACHHIPUR 1 00 00 10
5 00 00 61
6 00 03 90
328 00 00 22
327 00 00 58
326 00 01 04
325 00 02 17
324 00 01 92
322 00 01 91
323 00 01 73
323/1652 00 01 73
336 00 01 57
337 00 02 81
338 00 01 49
339 00 01 62
340 00 01 86
341 00 01 87
342 00 01 66
343 00 02 85
646 00 01 73
648 00 00 10
647 00 01 66
645 00 01 84
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5559
674 00 02 57
644 00 00 87
675 00 02 20
676 00 04 37
677 00 04 07
680 00 01 04
679 00 01 95
1059 00 02 40
1060 00 03 50
1061 00 05 89
1071 00 00 72
1062 00 01 83
1069 00 00 10
1068 00 02 20
1066 00 01 16
1065 00 00 10
1067 00 03 46
1051 00 00 72
1050 00 03 51
1049 00 05 60
1103 00 00 33
1104 00 00 10
1048 00 02 10
1047 00 00 51
1046 00 05 63
1035 00 00 33
1036 00 03 09
1037 00 00 38
1021 00 00 10
1028 00 01 84
1026 00 01 39
1027 00 04 79
KANACHHAI 2634 00 00 10
2635 00 02 25
2639 00 00 12
2638 00 00 43
2637 00 01 36
2636 00 01 41
2625 00 06 89
5560 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2624 00 02 65
2623 00 04 18
2654 00 00 10 2655 00 01 04 2622 00 00 67 2656 00 04 78 2797 00 03 40 2657 00 01 43 2796 00 02 57 2660 00 00 42 2793 00 03 79 2795 00 00 76 2794 00 05 72 2802 00 00 18 2790 00 03 50 2789 00 03 82 2788 00 00 51 2786 00 01 47 2785 00 01 36 2787 00 03 17 2784 00 09 78 2782 00 00 55 2783 00 09 47 5112 00 01 13 5113 00 03 95 5114 00 04 18 5111 00 00 80 5110 00 00 21 5115 00 03 59 5116 00 09 01 5117 00 00 82 5118 00 00 52 5092 00 03 87 5091 00 00 44 5066 00 00 81 5064 00 15 51 4995 00 09 33 4996/6015 00 01 89 4998 00 05 56 5004 00 01 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5561 5005 00 02 30 5002 00 02 16
5003 00 07 98
5006 00 01 93
4962 00 03 79
4964 00 03 17
4966 00 03 33
4972 00 05 74
4973 00 01 63
4971 00 01 03
5637 00 04 61
5638 00 01 36
5645 00 01 33
5636 00 00 45
5646 00 03 95
5647 00 03 66
5648 00 00 10
5629 00 01 10
5649 00 01 12
5650 00 03 06
5656 00 03 52
GAREIJHULI 1519 00 02 54
1518 00 02 38
1520 00 01 89
1517 00 04 40
1517/4335 00 01 47
1521 00 05 15
1494 00 02 34
1493 00 00 89
1492 00 03 10
1491 00 03 00
1490 00 00 70
1535 00 03 90
1533 00 05 28
1534 00 01 88
1532 00 09 76
1735 00 00 62
1657 00 00 96
1658 00 04 26
5562 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1656 00 00 41
1659 00 03 16
1660 00 01 02 1661 00 04 90 1705 00 00 16 1704 00 00 89 1703 00 01 14 1702 00 02 43 1701 00 03 37 1700 00 00 74 1692 00 01 86 1693 00 00 10 1694 00 03 64 1681 00 00 40 2853 00 11 51 2849 00 00 32 2848 00 01 65 2847 00 01 69 2201 00 00 13 2846 00 00 35 2845 00 04 99 2844 00 02 02 2203 00 00 12 2843 00 00 10 2840 00 00 22 2841 00 01 36 2842 00 00 10 2844 00 02 02 2834 00 00 64 2356 00 00 60 2358 00 02 25 2357 00 00 61 2359 00 02 46 2361 00 04 38 2365 00 00 19 2364 00 00 76 2363 00 03 19 2362 00 00 10 2393 00 00 19 2392 00 00 14[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5563 2391 00 01 39 2390 00 01 07
2378 00 00 30 2379 00 00 76 2389 00 01 86 2388 00 00 53 2380 00 02 36 2383 00 01 15 2382 00 01 47 2381 00 00 61 2384 00 00 51 2385 00 01 59 2769 00 00 88 2386 00 01 34 2407 00 03 24 2768 00 00 34 2767 00 00 61 2766 00 00 82 2765 00 00 15 2408 00 03 86 2409 00 03 51 2410 00 01 37 2411 00 00 62 2412 00 01 84 2464 00 00 24 2463 00 02 02 2462 00 00 84 2474 00 01 88 2475 00 01 86 2476 00 01 08 2472 00 02 21 2473 00 01 04 2471 00 02 97 2477 00 02 02 2691 00 02 53 2654 00 01 01 2653 00 03 21 2652 00 00 25 2656 00 00 475564 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2657 00 03 142658 00 02 26
2648 00 00 75 2659 00 01 35 2612 00 01 20 2647 00 03 29 2646 00 00 10 2613 00 03 65 2614 00 00 44 2633 00 00 94 2626 00 05 88 2627 00 00 24 2552 00 01 49 2554 00 03 27 2555 00 05 93 2556 00 01 42 2557 00 03 52 2590 00 05 52 2584 00 00 75 2583 00 01 48 2582 00 06 14 2585 00 02 30 2581 00 02 31 4144 00 00 54 4145 00 00 88 4146 00 00 13 4147 00 08 29 4148 00 00 13 4149 00 01 81 4150 00 00 10 4151 00 00 76 4152 00 02 16 4153 00 01 60 4154 00 00 63 4168 00 02 93 4167 00 00 14 4166 00 00 10 4169 00 00 89 4165 00 01 27 4170 00 09 29[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5565 4171 00 00 10 4261 00 00 89
4260 00 05 49
4270 00 05 94
4271 00 11 53
4290 00 11 50
4291 00 01 69
4299 00 02 51
4300 00 01 61
4297 00 00 17
4298 00 03 49
4301 00 01 09
HATIPAD PALLI 1820 00 00 10
1845 00 01 08
1848 00 02 09
1849 00 01 55
1847 00 01 26
1850 00 00 89
1851 00 00 57
1852 00 00 16
1853 00 02 37
1854 00 02 19
1858 00 00 43
1857 00 00 54
1856 00 03 39
1876 00 00 10
1875 00 02 40
1874 00 00 22
1888 00 00 64
1887 00 00 55
1889 00 00 72
1890 00 00 87
1892 00 01 47
1891 00 04 22
1897 00 01 18
1896 00 04 16
1938 00 01 06
1941 00 00 10
1940 00 02 05
5566 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1939 00 00 14
1952 00 07 13
1953 00 00 12 3427 00 00 74 3426 00 00 62 3425 00 00 13 3424 00 00 10 3423 00 00 60 3429 00 03 77 3422 00 03 33 3436 00 00 33 3437 00 04 48 3421 00 00 11 3419 00 00 96 3419/3609 00 00 49 3418 00 02 52 3438 00 01 44 3443 00 01 87 3442 00 01 54 3441 00 00 10 3451 00 00 76 3450 00 01 35 3449 00 00 90 3452 00 02 72 3453 00 01 37 3454 00 01 70 3455 00 00 10 3518 00 03 03 3517 00 00 10 3520 00 09 16 3521 00 00 49 3542 00 01 31 3522 00 00 95 3523 00 00 15 3541 00 00 74 3524 00 00 93 3540 00 00 39 3525 00 01 69 3539 00 00 10 3526 00 01 39[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5567 3509 00 00 51 3527 00 01 13
3528 00 00 27
3529 00 00 10
3503 00 04 49
3504 00 00 10
3502 00 02 33
3501 00 00 78
3493 00 11 98
3492 00 02 26
3583 00 00 40
3491 00 05 50
KENDUBADI 1638 00 05 67
1640 00 02 15
1642 00 02 22
1639 00 00 63
1641 00 01 81
1849 00 00 10
1853 00 00 10
1848 00 00 10
1850 00 03 18
1851 00 01 45
1852 00 00 94
1844 00 01 86
1845 00 00 69
1846 00 02 61
1847 00 00 25
1842 00 00 41
1843 00 01 68
1841 00 02 42
1864 00 03 19
1869 00 01 66
1840 00 06 02
1880 00 02 29
1879 00 04 83
1878 00 01 21
1875 00 00 18
1877 00 00 20
1876 00 04 85
5568 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1940 00 00 21
1936 00 03 36
1939 00 02 60 1937 00 01 73 1938 00 01 44 1944 00 00 85 1943 00 01 35 1951 00 01 80 1950 00 00 30 1952 00 01 77 1953 00 01 69 1956 00 01 72 1954 00 01 13 1955 00 03 95 1793 00 04 70 1792 00 05 49 2903 00 00 31 3161 00 01 69 2902 00 02 32 2906 00 03 17 2911 00 00 13 2900 00 00 15 2910 00 00 69 2909 00 01 42 2907 00 01 12 2933 00 00 48 2908 00 02 90 2889 00 01 94 2890 00 03 02 2938 00 01 54 2935 00 01 40 2934 00 00 10 2943 00 00 56 2937 00 03 38 2936 00 00 10 2946 00 01 75 2941 00 00 10 2942 00 03 47 2947 00 02 23 2998 00 01 01[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5569 2997 00 09 60 2995 00 04 66
2994 00 04 59 2996 00 00 10 2991 00 03 54 2992 00 01 65 2993 00 00 10 2983 00 00 62 2985 00 12 39 2990 00 00 44 2986 00 02 37 2982 00 00 10 2978 00 00 88 2979 00 03 06 2980 00 00 64 2976 00 00 12 2977 00 00 67 3716 00 02 36 3726 00 02 18 2970 00 01 85 3717 00 00 46 3727 00 01 45 2969 00 02 98 3718 00 00 37 3719 00 00 85 3720 00 01 27 3722 00 02 43 3721 00 02 36 3724 00 00 31 3723 00 02 35 3726 00 02 18 3728 00 01 24 3729 00 02 91 3731 00 02 77 3730 00 00 50 3732 00 00 85 7314 00 01 43 7316 00 03 18 7317 00 00 225570 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
7318 00 01 597319 00 02 02
7329 00 01 05 7330 00 02 40 7332 00 00 76 7331 00 01 58 7333 00 01 71 7337 00 00 36 7335 00 02 24 7336 00 01 69 7334 00 00 23 7341 00 07 03 7293 00 00 83 7292 00 03 36 7289 00 01 80 7282 00 05 22 7288 00 00 48 7283 00 00 38 7279 00 00 76 7281 00 01 25 7280 00 02 48 7245 00 03 44 7018 00 07 60 7243 00 01 82 7242 00 00 56 6890 00 00 34 6889 00 01 06 7227 00 00 36 7226 00 00 06 7018 00 07 60 6890 00 00 33 6889 00 01 06 7217 00 11 49 7185 00 02 03 7184 00 03 39 7183 00 02 83 7182 00 03 41 7181 00 01 51 7180 00 02 03 7179 00 01 52[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5571 7175 00 00 97 7178 00 00 10
7174 00 00 71
7130 00 05 31
7129 00 00 18
7022 00 01 45
7023 00 05 53
7127 00 02 11
7024 00 00 50
7128 00 01 23
7125 00 01 31
7126 00 00 20
7116 00 00 17
7117 00 03 26
7118 00 00 64
7114 00 04 58
7113 00 00 10
7111 00 00 10
7112 00 05 50
7108 00 02 71
7099 00 04 95
7100 00 00 95
7098 00 00 64
7097 00 07 12
7093 00 05 32
7092 00 03 20
7091 00 03 35
6499 00 00 10
6495 00 01 16
6496 00 05 59
6497 00 00 10
6494 00 00 10
MANDARO 595 00 06 58
594 00 57 40
646 00 00 34
642 00 16 35
643 00 04 44
638 00 16 57
640 00 07 94
5572 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
639 00 07 13 657 00 24 82 658 00 09 19 675 00 04 95 665 00 18 89 1092 00 09 21 1142 00 04 27 1143 00 00 10 1144 00 10 69 1145 00 16 20 1148 00 27 76 1153 00 14 66 1218 00 00 12 1219 00 04 01 1220 00 04 57 1221 00 06 48 1221/8269 00 05 83 1222 00 06 07 1213 00 02 56 1166 00 02 98 1165 00 08 84 1167 00 00 10 1171 00 01 98 1172 00 06 62 1173 00 07 10 1174 00 07 91 1177 00 07 94 1186 00 01 24 1184 00 09 97 1184/8254 00 00 10 1183 00 04 60 4045/8354 00 00 10 1182 00 08 11 7543 00 00 57 7544 00 04 43 7545 00 01 44 7549 00 06 97 7539 00 02 98 7540 00 05 32 7527 00 00 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5573 7528 00 06 00 7524 00 02 99
7525 00 00 19 7523 00 04 83 7459 00 00 79 7458 00 00 10 7522 00 00 47 7472 00 03 70 7519 00 00 10 7471 00 00 48 7474 00 00 83 7473 00 03 07 7475 00 01 55 7476 00 02 16 7477 00 01 05 7513 00 00 10 7482 00 03 18 7512 00 00 43 7511 00 00 45 7510 00 00 72 7483 00 04 87 7484 00 01 85 7494 00 08 25 7493 00 00 17 7495 00 00 14 7282 00 02 11 7281 00 01 18 7280 00 00 91 7230 00 05 45 7231 00 02 13 7232 00 03 29 7233 00 03 80 7234 00 00 51 7214 00 12 90 7239 00 00 10 7213 00 03 04 7212 00 06 17 5429 00 04 31 5430 00 03 035574 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5431 00 02 58 5436 00 05 34
5437 00 08 02 5438 00 03 15 5439 00 04 43 5380 00 03 03 5379 00 01 53 5379/8098 00 01 93 5378 00 06 81 5377 00 03 65 5349 00 00 96 5375 00 03 58 5350 00 02 32 5352 00 05 46 5354 00 02 57 5353 00 00 95 5351 00 00 12 5294/8151 00 00 10 5355 00 01 84 5267 00 06 59 5268 00 02 35 5263 00 01 45 5262 00 04 51 5264 00 00 10 5265 00 00 28 5261 00 04 19 5260 00 05 06 5259 00 00 39 5254 00 00 55 5258 00 01 45 5255 00 00 10 5257 00 01 95 5237 00 00 19 5238 00 00 73 5256 00 00 95 5239 00 01 72 5240 00 02 23 5241 00 02 18 5242 00 02 08 5244 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5575 5243 00 02 68 5227 00 02 16
5228 00 01 09
5225 00 01 49
5224 00 00 60
5226 00 04 46
5221 00 00 90
5220 00 06 03
5222 00 00 10
5214 00 00 10
5213 00 00 37
5212 00 01 80
5211 00 04 58
5210 00 05 77
RUMAGADA 1370 00 03 33
1369 00 08 21
1021 00 01 34
1022 00 01 57
1023 00 01 08
1366 00 00 98
1028 00 01 29
1027 00 08 96
1034 00 07 29
1035 00 00 10
1036 00 01 85
1037 00 02 12
1038 00 00 58
1044 00 02 79
1043 00 07 45
1045 00 03 99
1064 00 00 10
1065 00 04 18
1085 00 00 26
1080 00 01 12
1073 00 00 57
1074 00 04 32
1075 00 04 67
1076 00 05 43
1071 00 02 38
5576 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1070 00 00 10
1150 00 06 34
1151 00 03 83 1010 00 02 82 1009 00 00 31 1008 00 02 97 1007 00 03 04 841 00 03 81 842 00 00 10 856 00 05 83 857 00 00 46 858 00 06 07 872 00 09 36 871 00 03 13 877 00 01 07 870 00 00 29 887 00 04 34 878 00 00 25 886 00 03 87 885 00 03 19 888 00 00 07 884 00 00 35 957 00 01 38 958/7150 00 01 61 958/7151 00 02 13 958 00 03 19 958/7152 00 02 84 955 00 00 55 952 00 02 83 959 00 00 10 953 00 00 14 951 00 06 32 942 00 00 24 4519 00 07 88 4521 00 00 23 4520 00 04 78 4539 00 02 18 4540 00 01 10 4541 00 00 10 4538 00 06 72[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5577 4561 00 01 05 4562 00 00 57
4561/7303 00 03 83 4584 00 00 41 4583 00 00 19 4578 00 02 92 4580 00 01 68 4581 00 02 05 4607 00 02 99 4611 00 02 77 4612 00 02 09 4613 00 01 72 4629 00 02 60 4630/7251 00 02 43 4630 00 04 23 4631 00 01 37 4627 00 02 63 4628 00 00 10 4671 00 01 56 5295 00 02 41 5296 00 04 52 5292 00 04 50 5300 00 11 67 5301 00 00 36 5314 00 00 37 5315 00 02 16 5309 00 00 50 5325 00 04 67 5342 00 01 51 5343 00 01 91 5347 00 01 40 5348 00 03 07 5357 00 05 03 5359 00 07 35 5377 00 03 99 5378 00 00 12 5403 00 00 10 5407 00 02 54 5404 00 01 325578 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5408 00 05 70 5409 00 00 11
5417 00 00 84
5418 00 03 23
5416 00 00 53
5427 00 02 30
5428 00 02 77
5452 00 00 15
5453 00 04 08
5454 00 03 21
5461 00 00 10
5462 00 01 72
5463 00 02 68
5505 00 02 12
5506 00 01 76
5501 00 02 57
5502 00 01 21
5500 00 03 91
BHATAKHALI 1497 00 03 14
1490 00 02 46
1503 00 01 62
1489 00 01 61
1488 00 03 54
1524 00 07 14
1523 00 01 68
1531 00 03 00
1520 00 04 69
1532 00 00 10
1519 00 03 29
1550 00 07 03
1551 00 03 48
1420 00 07 02
1419 00 09 32
1418 00 00 40
1555 00 10 97
1559 00 06 00
1562 00 07 18
1567 00 04 74
1568/6397 00 04 39
1568 00 05 14
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5579
1581 00 01 34
1584 00 04 83
1586 00 00 86 1585 00 02 30 1606 00 01 48 1607 00 03 51 1605 00 00 59 1608 00 02 28 1609 00 02 91 1604 00 00 19 1618 00 00 30 1610 00 04 13 1617 00 00 10 1615 00 00 14 1611 00 03 62 1612 00 03 42 1613 00 02 44 1614 00 00 99 1643 00 00 39 1644 00 01 57 1645 00 03 97 1646 00 00 46 1660 00 01 44 1659 00 03 54 1640 00 01 68 1661 00 06 56 1688 00 12 01 1687 00 04 07 1686 00 03 84 1672 00 00 72 1673 00 02 16 1675 00 00 21 1676 00 05 27 1677 00 03 89 1678 00 05 23 2861 00 02 33 2957 00 00 51 2959 00 02 25 2958 00 05 705580 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2976 00 00 88 2981 00 01 82
2977 00 02 10 2979 00 01 20 2980 00 01 64 2985 00 02 16 2986 00 01 65 2987 00 04 02 2991 00 00 10 2990 00 05 80 2989 00 00 10 2995 00 04 55 2992 00 00 66 2994 00 00 10 3043 00 01 59 3042 00 02 81 3041 00 02 35 3011 00 02 45 3010 00 00 74 3009 00 00 13 3012 00 01 99 3014 00 00 10 3007 00 00 95 3013 00 04 17 3016 00 00 10 3017 00 08 03 5781 00 03 85 3018 00 01 17 5780 00 00 46 5777 00 02 57 5778 00 03 52 5855 00 03 36 5854 00 04 32 5853 00 00 10 5849 00 00 10 5850 00 03 43 5851 00 00 79 5847 00 04 53 5846 00 03 90 5865 00 00 52[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5581
5866 00 04 165867 00 00 51
5868 00 03 74 5869 00 00 10 5885 00 00 17 5884 00 03 58 5887 00 04 78 5888 00 01 30 5889 00 00 62 5890 00 00 10 5925 00 03 02 5931 00 00 24 5994 00 00 47 5993 00 07 00 5995 00 02 95 5992 00 00 46 5991 00 06 25 5990 00 00 74 5979 00 04 66 5989 00 02 75 5988 00 00 35 5980 00 01 50 5987 00 02 53 5986 00 01 83 5982 00 00 10 5983 00 01 23 5984 00 00 84 5985 00 00 67 6014 00 10 14 6069 00 00 84 6068 00 05 07 6066 00 07 79 6066/6424 00 00 10 6067 00 00 37 6064 00 00 14 6130 00 00 13 6131 00 08 95 6132 00 01 04 6133 00 08 205582 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 6230 00 07 08 6232 00 00 10
6231 00 04 47
6236 00 00 43
6229 00 02 24
6227 00 05 12
6282 00 00 10
6284 00 08 13
6283 00 05 34
6281 00 03 37
6287 00 01 15
6280 00 06 30
DUNGURI 874 00 02 69
875 00 02 39
876 00 00 36
877 00 07 47
961 00 04 25
962 00 01 75
963 00 00 10
955 00 01 88
954 00 00 87
953 00 00 82
964 00 04 32
965 00 00 14
966 00 02 51
967 00 00 20
975 00 02 74
976 00 01 33
974 00 00 47
977 00 02 93
973 00 00 20
979 00 00 99
980 00 01 94
1109 00 01 29
1110 00 01 31
1104 00 02 09
1101 00 00 53
1130 00 01 50
1131 00 01 93
1132 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5583
1133 00 00 36
1134 00 01 88
1099 00 01 46 1095 00 02 00 1096 00 00 56 1094 00 00 16 1091 00 02 64 1086 00 00 93 1087 00 01 45 1088 00 00 20 1084 00 00 75 1085 00 01 72 1081 00 00 99 1502 00 00 10 1504 00 01 43 1508 00 00 65 1506 00 00 91 1503 00 01 26 1486 00 01 24 1487 00 02 13 1488 00 00 10 1483 00 03 44 1484 00 03 38 1478 00 00 53 1479 00 06 06 1480 00 00 10 1472 00 02 58 1471 00 00 72 1469 00 00 18 1468 00 01 73 1467 00 00 91 1466 00 01 20 1465 00 02 25 1463 00 02 84 1460 00 00 10 1462 00 00 33 1451 00 00 11 1452 00 00 94 1453 00 01 405584 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1454 00 00 10 2664 00 00 54
2665 00 01 83 2666 00 00 65 2667 00 00 10 2668 00 03 84 2669 00 00 59 2670 00 02 06 2671 00 01 30 2672 00 00 10 2680 00 00 10 2681 00 00 33 2650 00 00 62 2651 00 02 86 2635 00 00 76 2636 00 01 40 2637 00 01 16 2638 00 01 23 2624 00 00 87 2625 00 02 22 2626 00 00 18 2614 00 00 89 2615 00 03 29 2616 00 00 19 2604 00 02 64 2601 00 02 03 2600 00 00 60 2594 00 03 60 2593 00 00 10 2591 00 00 97 2592 00 02 53 2841 00 00 60 2842 00 02 30 2866 00 02 03 2867 00 01 60 2875 00 00 18 2876 00 01 26 2877 00 02 95 2878 00 01 42 2879 00 04 76[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5585 2938 00 00 21 2939 00 00 30
2940 00 00 64
2941 00 02 46
2942 00 02 09
2955 00 04 14
2954 00 05 34
2992 00 02 43
2993 00 00 55
3001 00 03 07
3002 00 02 91
2991 00 07 18
2989 00 01 05
2988 00 01 85
3046 00 00 69
3043 00 02 15
3044 00 01 76
3045 00 01 62
3046 00 00 69
3081 00 03 24
3082 00 03 06
BALICHHAI 256 00 01 17
257 00 11 57
255 00 00 63
260 00 01 20
261 00 01 13
262 00 00 42
241 00 01 10
242 00 04 09
232 00 00 10
234 00 04 03
235 00 00 20
236 00 00 10
222 00 06 08
214 00 00 10
215 00 03 19
216 00 00 93
217 00 00 10
212 00 00 10
5586 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
183 00 03 64182 00 04 55
187 00 00 28 184 00 00 10 172 00 03 38 173 00 02 03 171 00 04 94 162 00 00 62 164 00 00 28 165 00 09 47 145 00 05 43 146 00 00 75 127 00 01 00 127/3369 00 00 98 128 00 00 55 135 00 01 78 134 00 02 97 133 00 02 90 131 00 03 19 2143 00 01 87 2144 00 05 91 2145 00 00 13 2151 00 00 28 2152 00 00 50 2153 00 02 73 2137 00 04 38 2138 00 00 36 2154 00 00 99 2155 00 04 99 2156 00 00 62 2157 00 00 11 2188 00 00 92 2189 00 03 06 2191 00 00 87 2187 00 02 64 2186 00 00 68 2220 00 02 24 2221 00 14 30 2219 00 00 49 2216 00 02 47[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5587 2228 00 00 11 2229 00 00 49
2232 00 05 22 2231 00 04 17 2233 00 00 10 2239 00 00 60 2242 00 02 00 2243 00 01 47 2244 00 01 72 2241 00 02 50 2380 00 00 56 2346 00 01 47 2349 00 03 14 2350 00 04 76 2348 00 00 86 2351 00 02 68 2352 00 02 78 2355 00 00 89 2356 00 00 84 2357 00 00 21 2449 00 01 93 2447 00 01 41
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2019201920192019....————के न्(ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इस से उपाबA अनुसूची में वBर्णत है और िजस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्(ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Oए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Rक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वBर्णत भूमि में हितबA है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इTीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Wी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप<रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I5588 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील - बुगुड़ा | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
ताम्बेरि 3263 00 18 50
3265 00 03 49
3081 00 01 80
131 00 06 70
108 00 04 58
140 00 13 50
141 00 04 15
143 00 05 55
144 00 09 45
156 00 10 10
146 00 01 76
155 00 03 16
158 00 24 54
919 00 05 87
927 00 16 79
928 00 06 14
990 00 00 10
931 00 01 48
932 00 00 12
989 00 01 66
987 00 04 66
986 00 02 54
933 00 01 77
985 00 04 84
985/3503 00 03 52
1000 00 00 91
984 00 02 29
1017 00 01 60
1018 00 04 27
3508 00 04 15
1019 00 02 55
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5589
1019/3509 00 06 783560 00 00 11
1021 00 06 29 1027 00 03 30 1026 00 01 60 1028 00 01 47 1030 00 00 37 1031 00 05 10 1032 00 01 21 1034 00 00 72 1033 00 02 60 1040 00 06 79 1205 00 02 77 1201 00 05 95 1202 00 11 66 3117 00 00 10 1262 00 00 10 1282 00 06 03 1281 00 03 08 1280 00 03 70 1279 00 03 98 1277 00 02 74 1294 00 00 10 1346 00 06 05 1295 00 00 25 1345 00 02 49 1344 00 00 46 1347 00 01 74 1348 00 06 30 1352 00 02 22 1349 00 00 57 1351 00 03 63 1350 00 00 33 1511 00 03 87 1516 00 00 80 1512 00 02 74 1515 00 05 075590 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1514 00 00 13 1525 00 02 23
1526 00 01 53 1527 00 01 37 1528 00 00 88 1529 00 00 49 1530 00 01 33 1500 00 00 41 1531 00 04 85 1499 00 00 10 1494 00 00 63 1493 00 03 21 1492 00 06 65 1538 00 03 44 3201 00 01 08 1454 00 07 12 1579 00 00 72 1581 00 00 10 1580 00 00 18 1609 00 00 69 1607 00 03 23 1606 00 00 12 1605 00 00 47 1612 00 00 44 1604 00 04 33 1613 00 02 18 1603 00 00 10 1614 00 04 61 1621 00 02 38 1620 00 00 48 1619 00 02 22 1622 00 00 93 1629 00 02 18 1618 00 01 54 1630 00 05 25 1631 00 02 87 1635 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5591 1634 00 02 38 1632 00 00 10
1633 00 03 02 1712 00 02 15 1757 00 01 74 1754 00 00 31 1756 00 02 55 28/2962 00 00 98 1755 00 00 78 1752 00 00 16 1751 00 02 70 1773 00 03 12 1777 00 01 96 1774 00 00 17 1776 00 01 66 1778 00 00 15 1785 00 00 40 1786 00 03 14 1775 00 00 56 1787 00 00 59 1788 00 01 24 1784 00 01 01 1790 00 01 28 1791 00 00 15 1792 00 01 13 1812 00 00 11 1793 00 00 32 1807 00 02 22 1811 00 01 49 1810 00 02 80 1809 00 00 10 1807/2998 00 01 49 1808 00 07 57 1842/3013 00 00 70 1819 00 00 18 1842 00 05 56 1843 00 06 385592 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1841 00 03 63 1839 00 00 10
1840 00 03 75
3547 00 00 41
3546 00 02 83
1832 00 03 88
1831 00 01 77
1830 00 03 94
मािणतरा 672 00 04 54
671/5740 00 02 15
672/5743 00 00 93
671/5741 00 01 36
671 00 04 39
670/5662 00 04 37
585 00 00 10
595 00 03 14
631 00 00 50
629 00 00 23
628 00 00 18
597 00 09 54
626 00 00 43
625 00 02 63
603 00 01 82
602 00 00 19
604 00 01 62
607 00 03 24
606 00 02 59
608 00 00 51
609 00 03 94
610 00 01 22
556 00 00 56
555 00 04 61
554 00 00 95
610/5529 00 00 10
611 00 00 71
612 00 04 49
824 00 01 40
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5593
815 00 02 96814 00 00 55
816 00 04 16 817 00 04 39 823 00 00 10 820 00 07 04 819 00 00 18 821 00 03 57 3043 00 05 80 3042 00 04 38 3048 00 08 57 3049 00 00 78 3050 00 00 50 3071 00 03 97 3051 00 00 95 3052 00 02 90 3053 00 02 96 3054 00 04 04 3070/6095 00 00 10 3067 00 00 69 3058/5819 00 00 62 3061 00 00 92 3062 00 02 70 3063 00 01 78 3064 00 01 21 3066 00 01 09 2983 00 04 66 2911 00 00 16 2900 00 09 97 2883 00 00 37 2899 00 06 60 2901 00 00 56 2898 00 00 72 2896 00 01 40 2897 00 00 91 2888 00 00 97 2893 00 04 695594 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2894 00 02 90 2866 00 03 24
2846 00 07 62 2849 00 12 05 2850 00 00 53 2850/6131 00 00 52 2850/6135 00 00 49 2851/5579 00 00 10 2851 00 04 30 2569 00 00 96 2563 00 02 52 2568 00 00 70 2564 00 04 07 2559 00 04 95 2565 00 02 16 2566 00 04 34 2556 00 00 75 2555 00 06 89 2553 00 01 45 2554 00 00 10 2543 00 01 17 2547 00 00 57 2544 00 09 17 2546 00 02 34 2545 00 01 45 2535 00 01 22 2535/5634 00 01 10 2536 00 00 64 2533 00 06 41 2532 00 00 10 2531 00 00 77 2530 00 07 18 2534 00 00 23 2530/5554 00 01 26 2529 00 07 11 2175 00 01 19 2176 00 01 42[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5595 2177 00 04 75 2174 00 01 92
2178 00 02 79
2217 00 03 11
2218 00 03 03
2169 00 00 10
2219 00 03 64
2168 00 01 06
2220 00 02 25
2220/5538 00 11 04
2125 00 08 58
2124 00 16 94
2309 00 00 55
2115/5734 00 00 10
2114 00 12 59
2111 00 06 87
2108 00 05 79
2109 00 0 44
घोलपुर 3876 00 00 61
3877 00 00 24
3878 00 04 30
3879 00 01 23
3880 00 01 38
3882/4364 00 01 86
3883 00 00 14
3882/4365 00 01 87
3882 00 01 82
3881/4366 00 03 02
3882/4368 00 00 96
3882/4369 00 02 50
3882/4367 00 00 55
4647 00 01 11
3977 00 00 32
3978 00 00 43
3986 00 00 54
3985 00 01 59
3984 00 00 03
5596 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3987 00 03 79
3988/4499 00 04 06
3988/4500 00 03 24
3997 00 00 26
3998 00 03 94
3996 00 02 97
3995 00 01 80
3994 00 00 10
4001 00 00 10
4019 00 06 65
4021 00 02 28
4017 00 00 10
4022 00 03 83
4023 00 04 16
4024 00 03 42
4025 00 01 36
4199 00 00 85
4198 00 02 25
4200 00 00 68
4215 00 05 17
4216 00 00 55
4213 00 01 73
4217 00 03 53
4212 00 00 53
4332 00 05 55
4345 00 00 15
4333 00 05 83
4334 00 05 82
4335 00 00 52
4327 00 01 95
4328 00 00 19
4325 00 00 44
4336 00 00 28
4326 00 02 81
4323 00 00 11
4322 00 01 57
कानकतुe 726 00 02 66
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5597
725 00 08 45
724 00 04 49
723 00 01 48
717 00 04 51
722 00 03 20
718 00 03 46
721 00 00 61
720 00 00 75
719 00 00 69
712 00 02 03
711 00 01 45
839 00 00 30
710 00 01 48
841 00 01 16
708 00 02 34
850 00 02 23
706 00 01 42
851 00 11 70
902 00 02 30
900 00 03 31
897 00 00 10
901 00 00 10
899 00 06 44
898/2485 00 01 40
892 00 03 79
891 00 06 68
889 00 01 08
886 00 02 68
887 00 02 55
947 00 05 96
945 00 00 45
946 00 01 84
948 00 15 64
949 00 00 85
950 00 05 05
नगुडु 46 00 08 28
47/4679 00 05 73
5598 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
45 00 00 10
47/4686 00 01 47
47/4685 00 02 84 47 00 09 85 2263 00 00 38 47/4684 00 00 76 48 00 00 46 2259 00 03 90 48/4423 00 01 41 2260/4675 00 01 00 2261 00 00 10 2260/4674 00 02 08 2260 00 01 88 2255 00 01 68 2260/4673 00 01 58 2254 00 01 76 2253 00 02 53 2268 00 03 11 2268/4501 00 00 72 2235 00 08 77 2270 00 00 58 2351 00 10 86 2398 00 06 59 2399 00 06 61 2400 00 00 78 2410/4672 00 01 01 2401 00 00 94 2410 00 03 63 2409 00 01 79 2405 00 00 40 2404 00 00 10 2411 00 00 10 2408 00 01 63 2402 00 00 90 4389 00 00 52 2688 00 05 06 2691 00 00 58[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5599 2687 00 00 10 2692 00 02 82
2693 00 01 78
2696 00 01 01
2695 00 04 93
2694 00 00 91
2700 00 12 24
2701 00 00 10
2699 00 00 25
2709 00 15 56
2708 00 02 53
2708/4556 00 00 14
2626 00 01 69
2786 00 00 81
2787 00 02 60
2625 00 10 34
2791 00 00 39
2793 00 11 08
2795 00 01 51
2611 00 00 26
2800 00 01 55
2796 00 01 03
2797 00 00 10
2798 00 01 35
2799 00 01 68
2807 00 00 10
2801 00 02 14
2802 00 01 34
2806 00 06 39
2804 00 03 94
2805 00 03 45
2805/4422 00 01 46
3712/4421 00 00 15
संकु e 2977 00 00 10
2979 00 02 65
2993 00 06 19
2981 00 00 75
5600 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2992 00 03 17
2998 00 00 94 2991 00 05 15 2990 00 00 19 2987 00 04 82 2986 00 00 54 2988 00 00 22 3096 00 06 61 3037 00 05 10 3039 00 00 24 3040 00 01 77 3034 00 00 10 3094 00 05 97 3041 00 01 40 3093 00 03 37 3046 00 03 92 3092 00 05 21 3083 00 00 19 3084 00 04 18 3086 00 04 87 3085 00 01 03 3375 00 03 15 3374 00 01 33 3373 00 00 64 3380 00 00 10 3379 00 00 19 3378 00 02 64 3376 00 01 89 3377 00 01 45 3372 00 03 33 3398 00 01 35 3368 00 02 13 3410 00 02 21 3367 00 01 85 3366 00 05 22 3411 00 05 56 3412 00 03 99[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5601 3562 00 02 77 3563 00 03 39
3558 00 03 53 3552 00 00 17 3551 00 04 22 3557 00 02 87 3553 00 00 10 3541 00 05 13 3535 00 04 12 3540 00 01 19 3539 00 03 10 3536 00 03 47 3537 00 01 23 3533 00 00 10 3415 00 01 66 3486 00 06 52 3487 00 00 10 3485 00 02 93 3484 00 05 40 3483 00 04 94 3477 00 00 99 3478 00 05 70 3479 00 01 29 3460 00 02 20 4013 00 02 34 3459 00 03 45 3458 00 05 66 3457 00 05 13 3456 00 01 63 3452 00 05 42 3451 00 01 96 3852/4124 00 00 10 3853 00 04 01 3852 00 00 10 3854 00 02 64 3866 00 06 25 3865 00 04 295602 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3863 00 00 68 3868 00 02 23
3872 00 01 96
िबरंिचपुर 42 00 00 10
53 00 04 63
54 00 04 64
55 00 00 10
56 00 11 05
57 00 00 86
74 00 01 14
73 00 01 22
72 00 00 52
77 00 00 85
82 00 02 27
83 00 00 38
84 00 01 70
81 00 00 92
80 00 00 80
79 00 00 86
85 00 00 16
86 00 03 73
87 00 00 73
88 00 00 10
95 00 00 80
94 00 00 50
96 00 01 13
100 00 00 10
98 00 00 25
97 00 00 78
93 00 00 57
92 00 01 38
90 00 00 10
103 00 01 04
91 00 00 99
102 00 00 20
104 00 00 80
105 00 02 84
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5603
106 00 01 56 107 00 01 88 148 00 05 61 147 00 00 10 146 00 05 38 142 00 00 31 141 00 04 78 138 00 00 10 355 00 07 11 353 00 01 50 352 00 01 97 354 00 00 10 346 00 06 16 351 00 00 17 339 00 02 03 338 00 01 30 340 00 01 37 337 00 01 78 336 00 01 70 334 00 01 45 380 00 00 10 381 00 01 98 382 00 03 26 389 00 00 24 388 00 03 60 390 00 03 80 399 00 01 88 391 00 00 33 398 00 02 48 402 00 00 12 412 00 03 12 413 00 01 70 411 00 05 09 408 00 01 11 410 00 02 67 409 00 00 77 406 00 00 485604 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
421 00 00 94422 00 05 21
424 00 00 10 3187 00 01 04 3186 00 06 08 3119 00 08 37 3118 00 00 41 3132 00 00 25 3131 00 00 89 3129 00 02 03 3128 00 02 95 3127 00 00 34 3126 00 03 32 3124 00 00 81 3123 00 00 80 3125 00 03 90 3125/11371 00 01 52 3117 00 04 88 3112 00 01 19 3096 00 04 21 3097 00 06 35 3098 00 07 47 3100 00 02 65 3101 00 02 37 3090 00 03 52 3102 00 01 37 3103 00 00 56 3078 00 04 48 3078/11859 00 07 48 3077/11858 00 00 16 1060 00 06 67 1062 00 10 17 1061 00 01 06 1218 00 02 48 1064 00 00 28 1209 00 02 66 1215 00 01 32[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5605 1214 00 00 13 1213 00 02 43
1212 00 00 10 1225 00 02 10 1265 00 01 22 1266 00 01 47 1267 00 02 33 1268 00 05 16 1269 00 00 54 1274 00 02 57 1275 00 01 12 1283 00 06 13 1273 00 00 10 1281 00 00 10 1282 00 00 70 1284 00 01 51 1304 00 01 50 1303 00 03 12 1305 00 03 42 1302 00 02 57 1301 00 00 69 1308 00 01 77 1309 00 00 73 1298 00 00 10 1297 00 02 19 1315 00 02 95 1314/11703 00 00 10 1316 00 00 86 1320 00 00 25 1317 00 04 85 6464 00 01 13 6462 00 00 22 6463 00 04 38 6461 00 00 10 6459 00 02 65 6460 00 08 91 6432 00 01 115606 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6437 00 00 896436 00 01 03
6435 00 00 74 6434 00 00 46 6438 00 00 10 6439 00 02 27 6365 00 00 10 6364 00 02 01 6440 00 00 26 6359 00 03 31 6361 00 00 64 6360 00 01 60 6358 00 00 13 6357 00 00 22 6356 00 00 96 6371 00 02 84 6355 00 00 10 6346 00 02 16 6372 00 00 44 6347 00 00 17 6345 00 04 09 6341 00 00 10 6342 00 01 34 6344 00 01 20 6343 00 02 21 6317 00 00 63 6319 00 02 63 6318 00 05 65 6310 00 03 63 6299 00 01 45 6298 00 02 01 6297 00 04 07 6294 00 01 89 6641 00 00 10 6296 00 04 24 6295 00 01 28 6642 00 00 23[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5607 6646 00 00 38 6647 00 00 65
6648 00 02 03 6649 00 02 22 6650 00 01 73 6674 00 03 78 6675 00 00 10 6677 00 03 53 6678 00 01 57 6680 00 00 95 6679 00 00 50 6682 00 01 96 6684 00 02 43 6683 00 01 19 6685 00 01 47 6687 00 00 72 6686 00 02 48 7267 00 00 38 7268 00 01 15 7266 00 00 69 7269 00 02 15 7254 00 01 08 7253 00 02 33 7256 00 00 10 7255 00 02 93 7252 00 00 10 7249 00 01 99 7251 00 00 78 7247 00 00 91 7250 00 02 30 7240 00 01 66 7239 00 01 47 7233 00 08 01 7226 00 02 23 7229 00 01 84 7227 00 00 97 7228 00 01 325608 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 7196 00 02 17
आदिपुर 602 00 02 54
599 00 05 68
600 00 00 38
595 00 06 06
594 00 04 98
593 00 02 55
592 00 01 95
589 00 01 61
591 00 01 67
590 00 02 57
583 00 03 77
584 00 00 28
570 00 01 49
417 00 03 69
419 00 03 08
418 00 01 61
559 00 04 80
558 00 02 65
522 00 02 95
554 00 02 94
523 00 06 56
524 00 00 25
519 00 02 21
525 00 00 17
518 00 02 41
507 00 01 14
517 00 03 39
508 00 03 42
509 00 01 41
505 00 00 26
503 00 04 97
676 00 00 33
501 00 02 86
677 00 00 10
499 00 03 33
500 00 00 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5609
498 00 04 08
497 00 08 67
496 00 01 33 494 00 04 88 493 00 00 10 495 00 00 40 807 00 01 30 804 00 01 20 803 00 00 10 805 00 00 58 806 00 01 18 808 00 01 83 822 00 00 30 839 00 01 82 828 00 01 02 825 00 01 38 823 00 00 30 826 00 00 66 824 00 00 33 827 00 01 72 829 00 01 46 1045 00 02 55 1140 00 00 20 1141 00 02 04 1145 00 00 48 1142 00 00 42 1143 00 01 57 1144 00 01 66 1151 00 00 72 1152 00 00 85 1153 00 00 24 1157 00 00 25 1156 00 00 85 1155 00 00 92 1122 00 00 94 1167 00 01 30 1166 00 00 535610 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1165 00 00 10 1168 00 00 28
1128 00 00 73 1129 00 00 78 1126 00 00 53 1127 00 00 89 1130 00 00 24 1125 00 00 10 1121 00 00 16 1120 00 00 70 1124 00 00 49 1118 00 00 32 1123 00 01 13 1117 00 02 57 1116 00 11 43 1237 00 02 10 1068 00 03 43 1241 00 01 73 1242 00 03 29 1240 00 00 42 1243 00 00 53 1254 00 00 98 1253 00 02 13 1252 00 02 58 1269 00 00 96 1251 00 01 98 2501 00 01 56 5866 00 00 26 5865 00 01 16 5864 00 02 39 5869 00 01 15 2500 00 09 03 2499 00 01 26 2482 00 12 54 2483 00 04 89 2481 00 00 10 2480 00 00 13[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5611 2479 00 04 24 2478 00 04 45
2477 00 00 57 2474 00 04 21 2476 00 00 10 2475 00 00 48 2473 00 02 33 2472 00 02 18 2432 00 06 46 2420 00 00 41 2374 00 00 93 2358 00 00 24 2373 00 03 64 2372 00 03 51 2364 00 01 79 2371 00 00 28 2370 00 00 12 2365 00 02 18 2281 00 02 35 2366 00 01 64 2282 00 00 29 2280 00 00 53 2279 00 00 62 2283 00 01 17 2284 00 00 25 2259 00 00 44 2260 00 03 93 2258 00 02 09 2257 00 00 36 2256 00 00 34 2253 00 03 31 2255 00 00 55 2254 00 06 33 2242 00 00 34 2293 00 00 13 2233 00 00 77 2234 00 03 685612 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2232 00 00 55
2231 00 00 95
2225 00 01 40
2226 00 01 52
2224 00 01 21
2216 00 02 85
2212 00 00 10
2214 00 04 92
2213 00 00 10
2198 00 02 17
2197 00 00 74
2196 00 03 13
2593 00 04 98
2607 00 00 35
2640 00 01 34
2642 00 00 49
2609 00 00 10
2641 00 01 60
2639 00 00 45
2638 00 00 81
2643 00 01 45
2644 00 01 10
2635 00 01 58
2637 00 00 64
2617 00 01 91
2634 00 01 26
2633 00 02 17
2632 00 01 30
2631 00 00 83
2645 00 00 19
2630 00 02 27
2620 00 00 92
2650 00 00 10
2629 00 06 36
2651 00 01 06
2628 00 00 10
कृ ष्णशरणपुर 72 00 00 35
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5613
71/441 00 05 81164 00 02 61
163 00 04 40 163/455 00 17 15 162 00 09 01 161 00 02 40 193 00 07 63 152 00 07 05 148 00 01 85 151 00 01 89 149 00 02 43 150 00 01 34 209 00 02 43 208 00 03 77 207 00 01 26 204 00 00 56 214 00 01 36 215 00 02 10 216 00 05 50 219 00 01 90 272 00 03 49 270 00 02 14 269 00 00 49 268 00 00 18 217 00 08 74 218 00 00 92 246 00 04 02 261/420 00 00 10 262 00 00 10 241 00 00 10 343 00 00 11 247 00 04 06 248 00 02 32 339 00 01 57 345 00 09 63 344 00 01 46 353 00 00 615614 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
355 00 11 61357 00 05 43
हरिशरणपुर 2 00 01 58
3 00 00 80
4 00 01 66
5 00 01 83
7 00 02 80
8 00 00 30
9 00 05 37
15 00 01 47
14 00 03 73
20 00 05 32
16 00 01 76
19 00 00 45
26 00 04 78
30 00 00 32
27 00 04 88
28 00 02 50
29 00 00 16
42 00 03 93
41 00 00 47
40 00 00 10
44 00 00 88
45 00 09 25
46 00 00 10
124 00 05 24
119 00 00 10
120 00 00 25
122 00 04 51
121 00 00 36
123 00 00 10
142 00 01 40
141 00 00 39
143 00 01 56
145 00 05 27
144 00 01 82
148 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5615
147 00 03 14
135 00 04 37
146 00 00 10
331 00 00 13
332 00 02 52
340 00 04 28
333 00 00 14
339 00 00 83
341 00 02 76
338 00 05 79
352 00 03 76
359 00 00 12
358 00 02 92
353 00 00 10
360 00 00 14
361 00 00 48
363 00 01 07
362 00 08 04
357 00 01 88
बेतारसिंगि 5098/5283 00 01 17
5100 00 00 10
5101 00 02 11
5102 00 03 98
5180 00 02 51
5180/5806 00 01 72
5107 00 00 11
5179 00 05 31
5176 00 03 18
5177 00 00 83
5171 00 07 15
5197 00 00 10
5198 00 01 05
5169 00 03 39
5168 00 00 54
5201 00 07 68
5202 00 01 18
5203 00 00 43
5616 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
5204 00 03 115205 00 05 60
5206 00 02 09
5209 00 05 44
5208 00 02 12
5227 00 01 42
5216 00 02 92
5215 00 00 72
5217 00 05 45
5222 00 00 87
5218 00 01 02
5219 00 05 55
5220 00 05 59
4904 00 00 63
बुगुड़ा 1 00 02 30
13 00 06 27
12 00 03 74
14 00 01 35
16 00 05 12
19 00 00 42
20 00 06 07
21 00 04 72
22 00 00 48
29 00 00 45
30 00 00 61
31 00 00 64
60 00 02 50
59 00 01 39
57 00 04 93
56 00 08 68
55 00 09 15
54 00 02 06
53 00 01 70
49 00 05 17
50 00 01 60
48 00 07 4
47 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5617
104 00 04 18102 00 00 23
105 00 03 50 101 00 01 19 106 00 01 92 100 00 02 48 107 00 00 11 135 00 00 55 99 00 01 95 136 00 06 09 134 00 00 10 137 00 04 64 138 00 04 50 139 00 00 28 140 00 02 56 131 00 00 10 567 00 02 14 567/5739 00 00 10 567/5740 00 00 10 831 00 07 90 832 00 02 29 833 00 02 50 827 00 00 66 834 00 03 86 839 00 06 24 858/6338 00 02 23 858 00 05 90 859 00 08 30 899 00 03 88 900 00 04 59 898 00 00 10 897 00 04 36 901 00 02 36 891 00 00 30 896 00 02 05 892 00 02 68 895 00 01 895618 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 894 00 03 83
893 00 02 01 965 00 02 93 966 00 01 15 964 00 01 23 963 00 01 92 961 00 03 39 968 00 02 54 976 00 01 95 988 00 02 64 984 00 04 82 987 00 02 58 986 00 03 46 985 00 12 49 993 00 00 10 1178 00 00 24 1169 00 04 50 1162 00 00 23 1161 00 00 17 1155 00 01 90 1174 00 01 10 1175 00 00 3 1154 00 03 18 1180 00 00 10 1152 00 06 07 1150 00 03 13 1149 00 04 35 1147 00 00 12 1148 00 01 37 1145 00 00 94 1144 00 03 63 1185 00 03 48 1143 00 01 65 1186 00 01 37 1187 00 07 42 1189 00 02 24 1188 00 00 43[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5619 1191 00 00 89
1190 00 01 94
1192 00 02 53
1199 00 00 81
रामhडा 6144 00 07 47
6157 00 05 38
6156 00 02 63
6155 00 00 86
6158 00 00 10
6163 00 00 77
6164 00 00 59
6162 00 01 01
6159 00 00 10
6161 00 00 95
6165 00 01 01
6160 00 00 59
6166 00 04 83
6170 00 01 09
6171 00 01 72
6172 00 00 52
6175 00 07 06
गोलामुhडला 401 00 05 82
400 00 02 19
399 00 01 16
376 00 00 14
388 00 00 19
389 00 02 69
390 00 01 90
386 00 03 75
384 00 02 26
385 00 01 52
679 00 02 53
680 00 00 78
383 00 02 18
681 00 02 09
682 00 05 73
382 00 00 62
5620 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
381 00 00 16
359 00 00 21
358 00 05 39 723 00 01 30 724 00 09 34 339 00 00 10 327 00 07 04 726 00 00 27 726/2867 00 04 99 321 00 04 61 1216 00 00 48 1217 00 08 12 307 00 00 58 306 00 04 56 305 00 00 10 1227 00 05 23 1226 00 00 50 1228 00 01 37 2170 00 01 98 2169 00 00 40 2168 00 00 32 2166 00 06 88 2171 00 02 75 2165 00 05 36 2140 00 07 40 2141 00 01 89 2138 00 00 50 2139 00 05 40 2131 00 04 30 2122 00 00 66 2123 00 01 92 2121 00 03 54 2108 00 00 37 2109 00 00 83 2110 00 02 32 2056 00 02 41 2057 00 01 16[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5621 2060 00 02 27
2111 00 00 19 2058 00 04 39 2059 00 00 11 2061/2894 00 01 91 2061 00 01 12 2062 00 00 35 2068 00 04 41 2067 00 02 78 2080 00 00 27 2071 00 01 93 2074 00 02 46 2075 00 00 10 2073 00 01 84 2072 00 00 88 1988 00 02 87 1989 00 00 64 2076 00 00 17 1987 00 04 45 1986 00 02 91 1930 00 04 33 1932 00 00 10 1931 00 05 33 1937/2859 00 01 53 1912 00 01 36 1762 00 01 10 1761 00 03 85 1760 00 02 18 1757 00 00 78 1759 00 01 32 1758 00 00 52 1778 00 00 10 1779 00 01 65 1780 00 02 50 1781 00 00 36 1729 00 05 51 1785 00 00 215622 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1728 00 03 58
1725 00 10 83
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2019.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : BUGUDA | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
TAMBERI 3263 00 18 50
3265 00 03 49
3081 00 01 80
131 00 06 70
108 00 04 58
140 00 13 50
141 00 04 15
143 00 05 55
144 00 09 45
156 00 10 10
146 00 01 76
155 00 03 16
158 00 24 54
919 00 05 87
927 00 16 79
928 00 06 14
990 00 00 10
931 00 01 48
932 00 00 12
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5623
989 00 01 66 987 00 04 66 986 00 02 54 933 00 01 77 985 00 04 84 985/3503 00 03 52 1000 00 00 91 984 00 02 29 1017 00 01 60 1018 00 04 27 3508 00 04 15 1019 00 02 55 1019/3509 00 06 78 3560 00 00 11 1021 00 06 29 1027 00 03 30 1026 00 01 60 1028 00 01 47 1030 00 00 37 1031 00 05 10 1032 00 01 21 1034 00 00 72 1033 00 02 60 1040 00 06 79 1205 00 02 77 1201 00 05 95 1202 00 11 66 3117 00 00 10 1262 00 00 10 1282 00 06 03 1281 00 03 08 1280 00 03 70 1279 00 03 98 1277 00 02 74 1294 00 00 10 1346 00 06 05 1295 00 00 25 1345 00 02 49 1344 00 00 46 1347 00 01 74 1348 00 06 30 1352 00 02 225624 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1349 00 00 57 1351 00 03 63 1350 00 00 33
1511 00 03 87 1516 00 00 80 1512 00 02 74 1515 00 05 07 1514 00 00 13 1525 00 02 23 1526 00 01 53 1527 00 01 37 1528 00 00 88 1529 00 00 49 1530 00 01 33 1500 00 00 41 1531 00 04 85 1499 00 00 10 1494 00 00 63 1493 00 03 21 1492 00 06 65 1538 00 03 44 3201 00 01 08 1454 00 07 12 1579 00 00 72 1581 00 00 10 1580 00 00 18 1609 00 00 69 1607 00 03 23 1606 00 00 12 1605 00 00 47 1612 00 00 44 1604 00 04 33 1613 00 02 18 1603 00 00 10 1614 00 04 61 1621 00 02 38 1620 00 00 48 1619 00 02 22 1622 00 00 93 1629 00 02 18 1618 00 01 54 1630 00 05 25[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5625 1631 00 02 87 1635 00 00 10
1634 00 02 38 1632 00 00 10 1633 00 03 02 1712 00 02 15 1757 00 01 74 1754 00 00 31 1756 00 02 55 28/2962 00 00 98 1755 00 00 78 1752 00 00 16 1751 00 02 70 1773 00 03 12 1777 00 01 96 1774 00 00 17 1776 00 01 66 1778 00 00 15 1785 00 00 40 1786 00 03 14 1775 00 00 56 1787 00 00 59 1788 00 01 24 1784 00 01 01 1790 00 01 28 1791 00 00 15 1792 00 01 13 1812 00 00 11 1793 00 00 32 1807 00 02 22 1811 00 01 49 1810 00 02 80 1809 00 00 10 1807/2998 00 01 49 1808 00 07 57 1842/3013 00 00 70 1819 00 00 18 1842 00 05 56 1843 00 06 38 1841 00 03 63 1839 00 00 10 1840 00 03 755626 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3547 00 00 41 3546 00 02 83 1832 00 03 88
1831 00 01 77
1830 00 03 94
MANITARA 672 00 04 54
671/5740 00 02 15
672/5743 00 00 93
671/5741 00 01 36
671 00 04 39
670/5662 00 04 37
585 00 00 10
595 00 03 14
631 00 00 50
629 00 00 23
628 00 00 18
597 00 09 54
626 00 00 43
625 00 02 63
603 00 01 82
602 00 00 19
604 00 01 62
607 00 03 24
606 00 02 59
608 00 00 51
609 00 03 94
610 00 01 22
556 00 00 56
555 00 04 61
554 00 00 95
610/5529 00 00 10
611 00 00 71
612 00 04 49
824 00 01 40
815 00 02 96
814 00 00 55
816 00 04 16
817 00 04 39
823 00 00 10
820 00 07 04
819 00 00 18
821 00 03 57
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5627
3043 00 05 80
3042 00 04 38
3048 00 08 57 3049 00 00 78 3050 00 00 50 3071 00 03 97 3051 00 00 95 3052 00 02 90 3053 00 02 96 3054 00 04 04 3070/6095 00 00 10 3067 00 00 69 3058/5819 00 00 62 3061 00 00 92 3062 00 02 70 3063 00 01 78 3064 00 01 21 3066 00 01 09 2983 00 04 66 2911 00 00 16 2900 00 09 97 2883 00 00 37 2899 00 06 60 2901 00 00 56 2898 00 00 72 2896 00 01 40 2897 00 00 91 2888 00 00 97 2893 00 04 69 2894 00 02 90 2866 00 03 24 2846 00 07 62 2849 00 12 05 2850 00 00 53 2850/6131 00 00 52 2850/6135 00 00 49 2851/5579 00 00 10 2851 00 04 30 2569 00 00 96 2563 00 02 52 2568 00 00 70 2564 00 04 075628 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2559 00 04 95
2565 00 02 16 2566 00 04 34 2556 00 00 75 2555 00 06 89 2553 00 01 45 2554 00 00 10 2543 00 01 17 2547 00 00 57 2544 00 09 17 2546 00 02 34 2545 00 01 45 2535 00 01 22 2535/5634 00 01 10 2536 00 00 64 2533 00 06 41 2532 00 00 10 2531 00 00 77 2530 00 07 18 2534 00 00 23 2530/5554 00 01 26 2529 00 07 11 2175 00 01 19 2176 00 01 42 2177 00 04 75 2174 00 01 92 2178 00 02 79 2217 00 03 11 2218 00 03 03 2169 00 00 10 2219 00 03 64 2168 00 01 06 2220 00 02 25 2220/5538 00 11 04 2125 00 08 58 2124 00 16 94 2309 00 00 55 2115/5734 00 00 10 2114 00 12 59 2111 00 06 87 2108 00 05 79 2109 00 0 44[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5629
GHOLAPUR
3876 00 00 613877 00 00 24
3878 00 04 30 3879 00 01 23 3880 00 01 38 3882/4364 00 01 86 3883 00 00 14 3882/4365 00 01 87 3882 00 01 82 3881/4366 00 03 02 3882/4368 00 00 96 3882/4369 00 02 50 3882/4367 00 00 55 4647 00 01 11 3977 00 00 32 3978 00 00 43 3986 00 00 54 3985 00 01 59 3984 00 00 03 3987 00 03 79 3988/4499 00 04 06 3988/4500 00 03 24 3997 00 00 26 3998 00 03 94 3996 00 02 97 3995 00 01 80 3994 00 00 10 4001 00 00 10 4019 00 06 65 4021 00 02 28 4017 00 00 10 4022 00 03 83 4023 00 04 16 4024 00 03 42 4025 00 01 36 4199 00 00 85 4198 00 02 25 4200 00 00 68 4215 00 05 17 4216 00 00 55 4213 00 01 73 4217 00 03 535630 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4212 00 00 53 4332 00 05 55 4345 00 00 15
4333 00 05 83
4334 00 05 82
4335 00 00 52
4327 00 01 95
4328 00 00 19
4325 00 00 44
4336 00 00 28
4326 00 02 81
4323 00 00 11
4322 00 01 57
KANAKATURU 726 00 02 66
725 00 08 45
724 00 04 49
723 00 01 48
717 00 04 51
722 00 03 20
718 00 03 46
721 00 00 61
720 00 00 75
719 00 00 69
712 00 02 03
711 00 01 45
839 00 00 30
710 00 01 48
841 00 01 16
708 00 02 34
850 00 02 23
706 00 01 42
851 00 11 70
902 00 02 30
900 00 03 31
897 00 00 10
901 00 00 10
899 00 06 44
898/2485 00 01 40
892 00 03 79
891 00 06 68
889 00 01 08
886 00 02 68
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5631
887 00 02 55
947 00 05 96
945 00 00 45
946 00 01 84
948 00 15 64
949 00 00 85
950 00 05 05
NAGUDU 46 00 08 28
47/4679 00 05 73
45 00 00 10
47/4686 00 01 47
47/4685 00 02 84
47 00 09 85
2263 00 00 38
47/4684 00 00 76
48 00 00 46
2259 00 03 90
48/4423 00 01 41
2260/4675 00 01 00
2261 00 00 10
2260/4674 00 02 08
2260 00 01 88
2255 00 01 68
2260/4673 00 01 58
2254 00 01 76
2253 00 02 53
2268 00 03 11
2268/4501 00 00 72
2235 00 08 77
2270 00 00 58
2351 00 10 86
2398 00 06 59
2399 00 06 61
2400 00 00 78
2410/4672 00 01 01
2401 00 00 94
2410 00 03 63
2409 00 01 79
2405 00 00 40
2404 00 00 10
2411 00 00 10
2408 00 01 63
5632 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2402 00 00 90
4389 00 00 52
2688 00 05 06
2691 00 00 58
2687 00 00 10
2692 00 02 82
2693 00 01 78
2696 00 01 01
2695 00 04 93
2694 00 00 91
2700 00 12 24
2701 00 00 10
2699 00 00 25
2709 00 15 56
2708 00 02 53
2708/4556 00 00 14
2626 00 01 69
2786 00 00 81
2787 00 02 60
2625 00 10 34
2791 00 00 39
2793 00 11 08
2795 00 01 51
2611 00 00 26
2800 00 01 55
2796 00 01 03
2797 00 00 10
2798 00 01 35
2799 00 01 68
2807 00 00 10
2801 00 02 14
2802 00 01 34
2806 00 06 39
2804 00 03 94
2805 00 03 45
2805/4422 00 01 46
3712/4421 00 00 15
SANKURU 2977 00 00 10
2979 00 02 65
2993 00 06 19
2981 00 00 75
2992 00 03 17
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5633
2998 00 00 94
2991 00 05 15
2990 00 00 19 2987 00 04 82 2986 00 00 54 2988 00 00 22 3096 00 06 61 3037 00 05 10 3039 00 00 24 3040 00 01 77 3034 00 00 10 3094 00 05 97 3041 00 01 40 3093 00 03 37 3046 00 03 92 3092 00 05 21 3083 00 00 19 3084 00 04 18 3086 00 04 87 3085 00 01 03 3375 00 03 15 3374 00 01 33 3373 00 00 64 3380 00 00 10 3379 00 00 19 3378 00 02 64 3376 00 01 89 3377 00 01 45 3372 00 03 33 3398 00 01 35 3368 00 02 13 3410 00 02 21 3367 00 01 85 3366 00 05 22 3411 00 05 56 3412 00 03 99 3562 00 02 77 3563 00 03 39 3558 00 03 53 3552 00 00 17 3551 00 04 22 3557 00 02 875634 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3553 00 00 10 3541 00 05 13 3535 00 04 12
3540 00 01 19
3539 00 03 10
3536 00 03 47
3537 00 01 23
3533 00 00 10
3415 00 01 66
3486 00 06 52
3487 00 00 10
3485 00 02 93
3484 00 05 40
3483 00 04 94
3477 00 00 99
3478 00 05 70
3479 00 01 29
3460 00 02 20
4013 00 02 34
3459 00 03 45
3458 00 05 66
3457 00 05 13
3456 00 01 63
3452 00 05 42
3451 00 01 96
3852/4124 00 00 10
3853 00 04 01
3852 00 00 10
3854 00 02 64
3866 00 06 25
3865 00 04 29
3863 00 00 68
3868 00 02 23
3872 00 01 96
BIRANCHIPUR 42 00 00 10
53 00 04 63
54 00 04 64
55 00 00 10
56 00 11 05
57 00 00 86
74 00 01 14
73 00 01 22
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5635
72 00 00 52
77 00 00 85 82 00 02 27 83 00 00 38 84 00 01 70 81 00 00 92 80 00 00 80 79 00 00 86 85 00 00 16 86 00 03 73 87 00 00 73 88 00 00 10 95 00 00 80 94 00 00 50 96 00 01 13 100 00 00 10 98 00 00 25 97 00 00 78 93 00 00 57 92 00 01 38 90 00 00 10 103 00 01 04 91 00 00 99 102 00 00 20 104 00 00 80 105 00 02 84 106 00 01 56 107 00 01 88 148 00 05 61 147 00 00 10 146 00 05 38 142 00 00 31 141 00 04 78 138 00 00 10 355 00 07 11 353 00 01 50 352 00 01 97 354 00 00 10 346 00 06 16 351 00 00 17 339 00 02 03 338 00 01 305636 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
340 00 01 37 337 00 01 78 336 00 01 70 334 00 01 45 380 00 00 10 381 00 01 98 382 00 03 26 389 00 00 24 388 00 03 60 390 00 03 80 399 00 01 88 391 00 00 33 398 00 02 48 402 00 00 12 412 00 03 12 413 00 01 70 411 00 05 09 408 00 01 11 410 00 02 67 409 00 00 77 406 00 00 48 421 00 00 94 422 00 05 21 424 00 00 10 3187 00 01 04 3186 00 06 08 3119 00 08 37 3118 00 00 41 3132 00 00 25 3131 00 00 89 3129 00 02 03 3128 00 02 95 3127 00 00 34 3126 00 03 32 3124 00 00 81 3123 00 00 80 3125 00 03 90 3125/11371 00 01 52 3117 00 04 88 3112 00 01 19 3096 00 04 21 3097 00 06 35[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5637 3098 00 07 47 3100 00 02 65
3101 00 02 37 3090 00 03 52 3102 00 01 37 3103 00 00 56 3078 00 04 48 3078/11859 00 07 48 3077/11858 00 00 16 1060 00 06 67 1062 00 10 17 1061 00 01 06 1218 00 02 48 1064 00 00 28 1209 00 02 66 1215 00 01 32 1214 00 00 13 1213 00 02 43 1212 00 00 10 1225 00 02 10 1265 00 01 22 1266 00 01 47 1267 00 02 33 1268 00 05 16 1269 00 00 54 1274 00 02 57 1275 00 01 12 1283 00 06 13 1273 00 00 10 1281 00 00 10 1282 00 00 70 1284 00 01 51 1304 00 01 50 1303 00 03 12 1305 00 03 42 1302 00 02 57 1301 00 00 69 1308 00 01 77 1309 00 00 73 1298 00 00 10 1297 00 02 19 1315 00 02 955638 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1314/11703 00 00 10 1316 00 00 86 1320 00 00 25
1317 00 04 85 6464 00 01 13 6462 00 00 22 6463 00 04 38 6461 00 00 10 6459 00 02 65 6460 00 08 91 6432 00 01 11 6437 00 00 89 6436 00 01 03 6435 00 00 74 6434 00 00 46 6438 00 00 10 6439 00 02 27 6365 00 00 10 6364 00 02 01 6440 00 00 26 6359 00 03 31 6361 00 00 64 6360 00 01 60 6358 00 00 13 6357 00 00 22 6356 00 00 96 6371 00 02 84 6355 00 00 10 6346 00 02 16 6372 00 00 44 6347 00 00 17 6345 00 04 09 6341 00 00 10 6342 00 01 34 6344 00 01 20 6343 00 02 21 6317 00 00 63 6319 00 02 63 6318 00 05 65 6310 00 03 63 6299 00 01 45 6298 00 02 01[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5639 6297 00 04 07 6294 00 01 89
6641 00 00 10 6296 00 04 24 6295 00 01 28 6642 00 00 23 6646 00 00 38 6647 00 00 65 6648 00 02 03 6649 00 02 22 6650 00 01 73 6674 00 03 78 6675 00 00 10 6677 00 03 53 6678 00 01 57 6680 00 00 95 6679 00 00 50 6682 00 01 96 6684 00 02 43 6683 00 01 19 6685 00 01 47 6687 00 00 72 6686 00 02 48 7267 00 00 38 7268 00 01 15 7266 00 00 69 7269 00 02 15 7254 00 01 08 7253 00 02 33 7256 00 00 10 7255 00 02 93 7252 00 00 10 7249 00 01 99 7251 00 00 78 7247 00 00 91 7250 00 02 30 7240 00 01 66 7239 00 01 47 7233 00 08 01 7226 00 02 23 7229 00 01 84 7227 00 00 975640 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 7228 00 01 32 7196 00 02 17 ADIPUR 602 00 02 54
599 00 05 68 600 00 00 38 595 00 06 06 594 00 04 98 593 00 02 55 592 00 01 95 589 00 01 61 591 00 01 67 590 00 02 57 583 00 03 77 584 00 00 28 570 00 01 49 417 00 03 69 419 00 03 08 418 00 01 61 559 00 04 80 558 00 02 65 522 00 02 95 554 00 02 94 523 00 06 56 524 00 00 25 519 00 02 21 525 00 00 17 518 00 02 41 507 00 01 14 517 00 03 39 508 00 03 42 509 00 01 41 505 00 00 26 503 00 04 97 676 00 00 33 501 00 02 86 677 00 00 10 499 00 03 33 500 00 00 69 498 00 04 08 497 00 08 67 496 00 01 33 494 00 04 88[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5641 493 00 00 10 495 00 00 40
807 00 01 30 804 00 01 20 803 00 00 10 805 00 00 58 806 00 01 18 808 00 01 83 822 00 00 30 839 00 01 82 828 00 01 02 825 00 01 38 823 00 00 30 826 00 00 66 824 00 00 33 827 00 01 72 829 00 01 46 1045 00 02 55 1140 00 00 20 1141 00 02 04 1145 00 00 48 1142 00 00 42 1143 00 01 57 1144 00 01 66 1151 00 00 72 1152 00 00 85 1153 00 00 24 1157 00 00 25 1156 00 00 85 1155 00 00 92 1122 00 00 94 1167 00 01 30 1166 00 00 53 1165 00 00 10 1168 00 00 28 1128 00 00 73 1129 00 00 78 1126 00 00 53 1127 00 00 89 1130 00 00 24 1125 00 00 10 1121 00 00 165642 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1120 00 00 70 1124 00 00 49 1118 00 00 32
1123 00 01 13 1117 00 02 57 1116 00 11 43 1237 00 02 10 1068 00 03 43 1241 00 01 73 1242 00 03 29 1240 00 00 42 1243 00 00 53 1254 00 00 98 1253 00 02 13 1252 00 02 58 1269 00 00 96 1251 00 01 98 2501 00 01 56 5866 00 00 26 5865 00 01 16 5864 00 02 39 5869 00 01 15 2500 00 09 03 2499 00 01 26 2482 00 12 54 2483 00 04 89 2481 00 00 10 2480 00 00 13 2479 00 04 24 2478 00 04 45 2477 00 00 57 2474 00 04 21 2476 00 00 10 2475 00 00 48 2473 00 02 33 2472 00 02 18 2432 00 06 46 2420 00 00 41 2374 00 00 93 2358 00 00 24 2373 00 03 64 2372 00 03 51[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5643 2364 00 01 79 2371 00 00 28
2370 00 00 12 2365 00 02 18 2281 00 02 35 2366 00 01 64 2282 00 00 29 2280 00 00 53 2279 00 00 62 2283 00 01 17 2284 00 00 25 2259 00 00 44 2260 00 03 93 2258 00 02 09 2257 00 00 36 2256 00 00 34 2253 00 03 31 2255 00 00 55 2254 00 06 33 2242 00 00 34 2293 00 00 13 2233 00 00 77 2234 00 03 68 2232 00 00 55 2231 00 00 95 2225 00 01 40 2226 00 01 52 2224 00 01 21 2216 00 02 85 2212 00 00 10 2214 00 04 92 2213 00 00 10 2198 00 02 17 2197 00 00 74 2196 00 03 13 2593 00 04 98 2607 00 00 35 2640 00 01 34 2642 00 00 49 2609 00 00 10 2641 00 01 60 2639 00 00 455644 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2638 00 00 81 2643 00 01 45 2644 00 01 10
2635 00 01 58
2637 00 00 64
2617 00 01 91
2634 00 01 26
2633 00 02 17
2632 00 01 30
2631 00 00 83
2645 00 00 19
2630 00 02 27
2620 00 00 92
2650 00 00 10
2629 00 06 36
2651 00 01 06
2628 00 00 10
KRUSHNASHARANPUR 72 00 00 35
71/441 00 05 81
164 00 02 61
163 00 04 40
163/455 00 17 15
162 00 09 01
161 00 02 40
193 00 07 63
152 00 07 05
148 00 01 85
151 00 01 89
149 00 02 43
150 00 01 34
209 00 02 43
208 00 03 77
207 00 01 26
204 00 00 56
214 00 01 36
215 00 02 10
216 00 05 50
219 00 01 90
272 00 03 49
270 00 02 14
269 00 00 49
268 00 00 18
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5645
217 00 08 74218 00 00 92
246 00 04 02
261/420 00 00 10
262 00 00 10
241 00 00 10
343 00 00 11
247 00 04 06
248 00 02 32
339 00 01 57
345 00 09 63
344 00 01 46
353 00 00 61
355 00 11 61
357 00 05 43
HARISARANPUR 2 00 01 58
3 00 00 80
4 00 01 66
5 00 01 83
7 00 02 80
8 00 00 30
9 00 05 37
15 00 01 47
14 00 03 73
20 00 05 32
16 00 01 76
19 00 00 45
26 00 04 78
30 00 00 32
27 00 04 88
28 00 02 50
29 00 00 16
42 00 03 93
41 00 00 47
40 00 00 10
44 00 00 88
45 00 09 25
46 00 00 10
124 00 05 24
119 00 00 10
120 00 00 25
122 00 04 51
5646 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
121 00 00 36
123 00 00 10
142 00 01 40
141 00 00 39
143 00 01 56
145 00 05 27
144 00 01 82
148 00 00 10
147 00 03 14
135 00 04 37
146 00 00 10
331 00 00 13
332 00 02 52
340 00 04 28
333 00 00 14
339 00 00 83
341 00 02 76
338 00 05 79
352 00 03 76
359 00 00 12
358 00 02 92
353 00 00 10
360 00 00 14
361 00 00 48
363 00 01 07
362 00 08 04
357 00 01 88
BETARSINGI 5098/5283 00 01 17
5100 00 00 10
5101 00 02 11
5102 00 03 98
5180 00 02 51
5180/5806 00 01 72
5107 00 00 11
5179 00 05 31
5176 00 03 18
5177 00 00 83
5171 00 07 15
5197 00 00 10
5198 00 01 05
5169 00 03 39
5168 00 00 54
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5647
5201 00 07 68
5202 00 01 18
5203 00 00 43
5204 00 03 11
5205 00 05 60
5206 00 02 09
5209 00 05 44
5208 00 02 12
5227 00 01 42
5216 00 02 92
5215 00 00 72
5217 00 05 45
5222 00 00 87
5218 00 01 02
5219 00 05 55
5220 00 05 59
4904 00 00 63
BUGUDA 1 00 02 30
13 00 06 27
12 00 03 74
14 00 01 35
16 00 05 12
19 00 00 42
20 00 06 07
21 00 04 72
22 00 00 48
29 00 00 45
30 00 00 61
31 00 00 64
60 00 02 50
59 00 01 39
57 00 04 93
56 00 08 68
55 00 09 15
54 00 02 06
53 00 01 70
49 00 05 17
50 00 01 60
48 00 07 4
47 00 00 10
104 00 04 18
102 00 00 23
5648 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
105 00 03 50
101 00 01 19 106 00 01 92 100 00 02 48 107 00 00 11 135 00 00 55 99 00 01 95 136 00 06 09 134 00 00 10 137 00 04 64 138 00 04 50 139 00 00 28 140 00 02 56 131 00 00 10 567 00 02 14 567/5739 00 00 10 567/5740 00 00 10 831 00 07 90 832 00 02 29 833 00 02 50 827 00 00 66 834 00 03 86 839 00 06 24 858/6338 00 02 23 858 00 05 90 859 00 08 30 899 00 03 88 900 00 04 59 898 00 00 10 897 00 04 36 901 00 02 36 891 00 00 30 896 00 02 05 892 00 02 68 895 00 01 89 894 00 03 83 893 00 02 01 965 00 02 93 966 00 01 15 964 00 01 23 963 00 01 92 961 00 03 39[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5649
968 00 02 54
976 00 01 95
988 00 02 64
984 00 04 82
987 00 02 58
986 00 03 46
985 00 12 49
993 00 00 10
1178 00 00 24
1169 00 04 50
1162 00 00 23
1161 00 00 17
1155 00 01 90
1174 00 01 10
1175 00 00 3
1154 00 03 18
1180 00 00 10
1152 00 06 07
1150 00 03 13
1149 00 04 35
1147 00 00 12
1148 00 01 37
1145 00 00 94
1144 00 03 63
1185 00 03 48
1143 00 01 65
1186 00 01 37
1187 00 07 42
1189 00 02 24
1188 00 00 43
1191 00 00 89
1190 00 01 94
1192 00 02 53
1199 00 00 81
RAMANDA 6144 00 07 47
6157 00 05 38
5650 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6156 00 02 63
6155 00 00 86
6158 00 00 10
6163 00 00 77
6164 00 00 59
6162 00 01 01
6159 00 00 10
6161 00 00 95
6165 00 01 01
6160 00 00 59
6166 00 04 83
6170 00 01 09
6171 00 01 72
6172 00 00 52
6175 00 07 06
GOLAMUNDALA 401 00 05 82
400 00 02 19
399 00 01 16
376 00 00 14
388 00 00 19
389 00 02 69
390 00 01 90
386 00 03 75
384 00 02 26
385 00 01 52
679 00 02 53
680 00 00 78
383 00 02 18
681 00 02 09
682 00 05 73
382 00 00 62
381 00 00 16
359 00 00 21
358 00 05 39
723 00 01 30
724 00 09 34
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5651
339 00 00 10
327 00 07 04
726 00 00 27 726/2867 00 04 99 321 00 04 61 1216 00 00 48 1217 00 08 12 307 00 00 58 306 00 04 56 305 00 00 10 1227 00 05 23 1226 00 00 50 1228 00 01 37 2170 00 01 98 2169 00 00 40 2168 00 00 32 2166 00 06 88 2171 00 02 75 2165 00 05 36 2140 00 07 40 2141 00 01 89 2138 00 00 50 2139 00 05 40 2131 00 04 30 2122 00 00 66 2123 00 01 92 2121 00 03 54 2108 00 00 37 2109 00 00 83 2110 00 02 32 2056 00 02 41 2057 00 01 16 2060 00 02 27 2111 00 00 19 2058 00 04 39 2059 00 00 115652 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2061/2894 00 01 91 2061 00 01 12 2062 00 00 35 2068 00 04 41 2067 00 02 78 2080 00 00 27 2071 00 01 93 2074 00 02 46 2075 00 00 10 2073 00 01 84 2072 00 00 88 1988 00 02 87 1989 00 00 64 2076 00 00 17 1987 00 04 45 1986 00 02 91 1930 00 04 33 1932 00 00 10 1931 00 05 33 1937/2859 00 01 53 1912 00 01 36 1762 00 01 10 1761 00 03 85 1760 00 02 18 1757 00 00 78 1759 00 01 32 1758 00 00 52 1778 00 00 10 1779 00 01 65 1780 00 02 50 1781 00 00 36 1729 00 05 51 1785 00 00 21 1728 00 03 58 1725 00 10 83
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5653नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2020202020202020....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि मे जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है,उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर , शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| अनुसूची | ||||
| तहसील- कबिसूर्यनगर | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
मागुरापु ंजा 1281 00 02 07
1282 00 00 45
1283 00 00 85
1284 00 00 41
1279 00 01 79
1280 00 01 90
1275 00 00 10
1276 00 00 67
1277 00 01 46
1278 00 00 63
1268 00 01 42
1308 00 01 28
1309 00 01 59
1261 00 02 32
1310 00 00 87
1260 00 03 42
5654 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1311 00 00 10 1259 00 03 12 1258 00 00 11 1255 00 02 37 1254 00 00 10 1257 00 00 37 1256 00 00 65 1240 00 02 62 1202 00 00 51 1231 00 02 15 1239 00 00 17 1232 00 01 90 1230 00 01 72 1233 00 00 37 1228 00 01 31 1565 00 00 63 1567 00 03 26 1568 00 03 79 1569 00 00 42 1577 00 02 00 1570 00 00 55 1571 00 01 27 1572 00 00 81 1573 00 00 35 1574 00 00 95 1575 00 01 06 1576 00 00 41 1589 00 00 12 2695 00 00 85 2696 00 01 56 2697 00 00 38 2693 00 01 57 2700 00 00 44 2699 00 00 81 2702 00 00 89 2701 00 00 60[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5655
2703 00 01 55 2706 00 01 93 2707 00 04 22 2708 00 00 10 2736 00 00 51 2737 00 00 82 2738 00 01 87 2739 00 00 95 2740 00 01 32 2810 00 01 00 2811 00 00 26 2809 00 02 19 2741 00 00 16 2808 00 02 22 2807 00 00 19 2806 00 00 57 2805/4081 00 00 14 2805 00 00 10 2798 00 02 64 2799 00 00 38 2744 00 01 86 2745 00 00 43 2797 00 00 59 2796 00 00 14 2795 00 00 14 2800 00 01 42 2801 00 01 23 2802 00 00 10 2793 00 05 14 2792 00 04 53 2970 00 00 97 2971 00 00 63 2972 00 01 08 2966 00 00 58 2967 00 01 70 2968 00 00 415656 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2969 00 00 85
2962 00 00 60
2963 00 00 70
2961 00 01 94
2960 00 01 06
2952 00 00 10
2953 00 00 10
2954 00 01 21
2955 00 00 48
2956 00 01 66
2957 00 00 18
2922 00 01 40
2923 00 00 38
2924 00 03 61
2943 00 10 04
2942 00 00 43
3400 00 03 96
3419 00 03 68
3416 00 02 60
3420 00 01 26
3421 00 00 84
3422 00 00 88
3423 00 00 92
3424 00 00 87
3425 00 02 97
3427 00 00 80
3428 00 01 26
3429 00 03 25
3430 00 03 72
3412 00 00 38
3411 00 02 83
3410 00 00 10
3431 00 01 33
3432 00 01 66
सुबुिलआ 3794 00 00 69
3800 00 01 34
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5657
3801 00 01 63 3802 00 00 85 3799 00 00 43 3798 00 00 10 3803 00 01 29 3804 00 03 02 3805 00 02 12 3806 00 00 44 3841 00 00 50 3842 00 00 35 3843 00 00 56 3844 00 00 36 3845 00 00 29 3846 00 00 10 3837 00 00 23 3838 00 01 47 3839 00 01 12 3836 00 00 87 3534 00 01 02 3851 00 00 77 3852 00 00 89 3532 00 00 57 3531 00 00 65 3531/3924 00 00 38 3861 00 00 10 3862 00 01 45 3866 00 00 79 3865 00 01 41 3863 00 01 09 3864 00 00 10 3879 00 02 54 3880 00 01 04 3882 00 00 10 3883 00 01 69 3884 00 00 70 3890 00 00 105658 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3891 00 01 89
3892 00 01 47
3893 00 01 26
3894 00 00 99
3522 00 00 11
3521 00 00 39
3517 00 00 99
3516 00 02 27
कनिआरि 1846 00 01 35
1849 00 11 72
1851 00 01 24
1853 00 02 78
1854 00 00 63
1855 00 01 01
1856 00 00 16
1857 00 01 38
3326 00 01 35
1858 00 01 20
1859 00 02 15
3324 00 00 22
3320 00 00 39
3321 00 01 55
3319 00 00 14
3322 00 01 82
3323 00 00 76
3316 00 01 15
3317 00 09 32
3312 00 02 97
3313 00 00 10
3307 00 04 59
3311 00 01 98
3310 00 02 60
3309 00 06 38
3353 00 02 50
3354 00 04 86
3352 00 08 48
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5659
3350 00 09 92
3348 00 00 10
3349 00 00 89
3371 00 05 46
3372 00 02 81
3373 00 02 95
3374 00 07 33
3375 00 02 11
3420 00 00 24
3421 00 00 54
3422 00 04 30
3423 00 00 10
3426 00 00 34
3417 00 02 45
3416 00 00 83
3415 00 01 33
3414 00 02 69
3174 00 01 11
3173 00 00 69
3166 00 00 10
3165 00 04 90
3164 00 00 74
3163 00 00 71
3162 00 00 49
3123 00 00 43
3122 00 03 37
3121 00 00 45
3109 00 00 85
3112 00 13 43
3111 00 15 75
मठतेन्तुलिआ 380 00 00 11
384 00 03 17
418 00 05 84
417/1598 00 07 33
424 00 06 04
493 00 02 07
5660 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
594 00 04 33
593 00 00 43
595 00 01 84
592 00 02 19
596 00 01 33
591 00 03 80
599 00 01 28
557 00 01 55
590 00 01 66
603 00 00 42
558 00 01 40
589 00 00 12
559 00 01 15
532 00 00 10
531 00 03 14
560 00 00 10
524 00 00 58
525 00 01 70
530 00 01 14
529 00 00 10
526 00 01 11
523/1601 00 00 82
523 00 00 35
527 00 00 36
521 00 07 44
508 00 00 71
509 00 03 34
510 00 00 10
बरिड़ा 2396 00 00 71
2395 00 00 38
2391 00 03 37
2390 00 03 10
2336 00 00 56
2337 00 03 64
2338 00 04 03
2312 00 05 73
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5661
2302 00 00 90 2303 00 04 62 2301 00 00 10 2305 00 00 15 2304 00 03 71 2288 00 02 16 2246 00 01 23 2287 00 01 45 2286 00 03 30 2283 00 00 42 2285 00 01 44 2284 00 01 69 2253 00 03 74 2252 00 01 40 2254 00 01 98 2218 00 00 11 2255 00 01 67 2256 00 01 34 2257 00 00 10 2181 00 05 47 2182 00 00 24 2180 00 01 22 2179 00 01 98 2178 00 00 20 2176 00 00 69 2183 00 00 10 2175 00 03 48 2173 00 00 11 2174 00 00 44 2104 00 00 10 2103 00 01 66 2105 00 02 38 2106 00 00 74 2107 00 00 10 2102 00 00 75 2110 00 01 755662 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2100 00 00 12 2111 00 01 68 2113 00 01 61 2112 00 03 76 2114 00 00 10 2115 00 01 14 2116 00 03 43 2117 00 00 51 2120 00 00 12 2156 00 04 60 2155 00 04 04 2154 00 02 89 2134 00 00 74 2135 00 02 52 2133 00 00 10 2151/10329 00 00 10 2136 00 02 42 2137 00 00 10 2087 00 01 64 1847 00 00 29 1848 00 04 03 1849 00 01 58 1845 00 02 39 1844 00 01 10 1843 00 01 87 1842 00 00 93 1837 00 00 89 1838 00 02 11 1839 00 00 70 1818 00 00 86 1829 00 01 61 1815 00 00 10 1819 00 00 85 1820 00 01 85 1822 00 03 32 1828 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5663
1827 00 00 10 1821 00 00 29 1824 00 00 57 1823 00 04 29 1803 00 01 04 1872 00 01 80 1784 00 01 51 1783 00 00 10 1785 00 01 92 1786 00 04 02 1787 00 00 10 1788 00 01 00 1789 00 04 46 1792 00 00 34 1790 00 06 33 1791 00 00 38 1764 00 01 59 1765 00 02 06 1768 00 02 37 1762 00 03 12 1766 00 01 10 1761 00 07 91 7892 00 01 68 8343 00 00 43 8342 00 06 77 8341 00 00 15 8340 00 00 76 8346 00 00 57 8347 00 02 50 8348 00 02 81 8349 00 00 50 8387 00 04 11 8386 00 01 56 8391 00 08 33 8442 00 00 93 8392 00 01 235664 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8437 00 01 758436 00 01 94
8395 00 00 39 8438 00 00 10 8435 00 00 18 8434 00 00 32 8433 00 00 62 8429 00 00 84 8430 00 02 03 8431 00 00 22 8428 00 00 42 8427 00 00 10 8425 00 02 57 8424 00 04 04 8468 00 01 01 8423 00 00 18 8419 00 00 72 8471 00 03 15 8470 00 02 11 8472 00 01 96 8474 00 02 62 8475 00 00 10 8473 00 00 10 8652 00 01 83 8748 00 01 16 8783 00 03 78 8784 00 00 10 8778 00 01 24 8777 00 00 12 8782 00 00 54 8781 00 00 61 8779 00 02 42 8774 00 00 10 8773 00 02 15 8780 00 01 57 8772 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5665
सान्तरापल्लि 3304 00 02 75
3069 00 00 33
3072 00 03 31
3073 00 02 01
3073/3410 00 02 30
3076 00 01 42
3077 00 01 73
3080 00 03 78
3081 00 03 22
3084 00 03 57
3085 00 01 19
3086 00 01 17
3087 00 00 68
3088 00 00 30
3089 00 00 10
3101 00 05 63
3100 00 00 38
3102 00 01 98
3103 00 00 10
3099 00 02 11
3104 00 01 30
3130 00 00 29
3129 00 01 62
3128 00 01 01
3127 00 00 16
3131 00 03 02
3126 00 03 16
3140 00 00 10
3143 00 01 52
3125 00 00 41
3144 00 01 32
3147 00 00 10
3145 00 01 99
3146 00 01 75
3148 00 00 10
3161 00 02 14
5666 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3162 00 02 24
3164 00 00 14
3163 00 01 33
3167 00 00 10
3170 00 02 30
3171 00 01 91
3169 00 00 88
3172 00 00 67
3173 00 02 22
3174 00 00 97
3211 00 00 10
3210 00 01 66
3209 00 00 60
3175 00 00 11
3191 00 04 29
3188 00 00 10
3189 00 00 88
3208 00 00 10
3190 00 01 44
3196 00 03 63
3192 00 00 10
3195 00 02 93
3197 00 02 70
3198 00 01 92
3200 00 01 08
2881 00 05 41
2881/3335 00 01 95
कु शपल्लि 595 00 03 31
592 00 01 73
593 00 00 23
594 00 01 09
609 00 00 10
586 00 03 04
587 00 03 53
583 00 00 41
584 00 04 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5667
585 00 00 99581 00 00 13
582 00 05 74 579 00 03 27 550 00 00 46 578 00 01 24 576 00 03 41 575 00 00 70 577 00 02 65 553 00 01 92 562 00 01 18 563 00 00 11 561 00 05 28 558 00 04 05 559 00 01 12 644 00 01 24 797 00 01 74 796 00 02 19 795 00 00 10 799 00 01 62 800 00 03 19 801 00 00 10 804 00 00 78 807 00 02 89 808 00 03 24 806 00 03 87 1056 00 04 80 1057 00 00 68 1055 00 04 47 1017 00 00 18 1018 00 03 59 1021 00 00 34 1022 00 04 03 1054 00 00 79 1023 00 03 09 1024 00 02 555668 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1025 00 05 55
1029 00 03 41
1031 00 03 35
1032 00 02 87
1033 00 02 32
1035 00 02 72
1034 00 05 62
1036 00 00 21
989 00 03 40
988 00 03 07
990 00 00 29
987 00 00 29
बलिआपल्लि 540 00 04 48
544 00 00 27
538 00 01 03
537 00 00 77
539 00 05 88
531 00 00 55
532 00 01 62
533 00 01 42
528 00 03 12
527 00 00 57
526 00 00 66
525 00 00 10
534 00 00 33
546 00 00 10
548 00 04 18
518 00 01 08
517 00 00 51
549 00 05 39
513 00 00 14
547 00 00 10
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5669
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2020.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : KABISURYANAGAR | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
MAGURAPUNJA 1281 00 02 07
1282 00 00 45
1283 00 00 85
1284 00 00 41
1279 00 01 79
1280 00 01 90
1275 00 00 10
1276 00 00 67
1277 00 01 46
1278 00 00 63
1268 00 01 42
1308 00 01 28
1309 00 01 59
1261 00 02 32
1310 00 00 87
1260 00 03 42
1311 00 00 10
1259 00 03 12
1258 00 00 11
1255 00 02 37
1254 00 00 10
1257 00 00 37
1256 00 00 65
5670 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1240 00 02 62
1202 00 00 51
1231 00 02 15
1239 00 00 17 1232 00 01 90 1230 00 01 72 1233 00 00 37 1228 00 01 31 1565 00 00 63 1567 00 03 26 1568 00 03 79 1569 00 00 42 1577 00 02 00 1570 00 00 55 1571 00 01 27 1572 00 00 81 1573 00 00 35 1574 00 00 95 1575 00 01 06 1576 00 00 41 1589 00 00 12 2695 00 00 85 2696 00 01 56 2697 00 00 38 2693 00 01 57 2700 00 00 44 2699 00 00 81 2702 00 00 89 2701 00 00 60 2703 00 01 55 2706 00 01 93 2707 00 04 22 2708 00 00 10 2736 00 00 51 2737 00 00 82 2738 00 01 87 2739 00 00 95 2740 00 01 32 2810 00 01 00 2811 00 00 26 2809 00 02 19 2741 00 00 16[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5671 2808 00 02 22
2807 00 00 19 2806 00 00 57 2805/4081 00 00 14 2805 00 00 10 2798 00 02 64 2799 00 00 38 2744 00 01 86 2745 00 00 43 2797 00 00 59 2796 00 00 14 2795 00 00 14 2800 00 01 42 2801 00 01 23 2802 00 00 10 2793 00 05 14 2792 00 04 53 2970 00 00 97 2971 00 00 63 2972 00 01 08 2966 00 00 58 2967 00 01 70 2968 00 00 41 2969 00 00 85 2962 00 00 60 2963 00 00 70 2961 00 01 94 2960 00 01 06 2952 00 00 10 2953 00 00 10 2954 00 01 21 2955 00 00 48 2956 00 01 66 2957 00 00 18 2922 00 01 40 2923 00 00 38 2924 00 03 61 2943 00 10 04 2942 00 00 43 3400 00 03 96 3419 00 03 68 3416 00 02 605672 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3420 00 01 26 3421 00 00 84 3422 00 00 88
3423 00 00 92
3424 00 00 87
3425 00 02 97
3427 00 00 80
3428 00 01 26
3429 00 03 25
3430 00 03 72
3412 00 00 38
3411 00 02 83
3410 00 00 10
3431 00 01 33
3432 00 01 66
SUBULIA 3794 00 00 69
3800 00 01 34
3801 00 01 63
3802 00 00 85
3799 00 00 43
3798 00 00 10
3803 00 01 29
3804 00 03 02
3805 00 02 12
3806 00 00 44
3841 00 00 50
3842 00 00 35
3843 00 00 56
3844 00 00 36
3845 00 00 29
3846 00 00 10
3837 00 00 23
3838 00 01 47
3839 00 01 12
3836 00 00 87
3534 00 01 02
3851 00 00 77
3852 00 00 89
3532 00 00 57
3531 00 00 65
3531/3924 00 00 38
3861 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5673
3862 00 01 45
3866 00 00 79
3865 00 01 41
3863 00 01 09
3864 00 00 10
3879 00 02 54
3880 00 01 04
3882 00 00 10
3883 00 01 69
3884 00 00 70
3890 00 00 10
3891 00 01 89
3892 00 01 47
3893 00 01 26
3894 00 00 99
3522 00 00 11
3521 00 00 39
3517 00 00 99
3516 00 02 27
KANIARI 1846 00 01 35
1849 00 11 72
1851 00 01 24
1853 00 02 78
1854 00 00 63
1855 00 01 01
1856 00 00 16
1857 00 01 38
3326 00 01 35
1858 00 01 20
1859 00 02 15
3324 00 00 22
3320 00 00 39
3321 00 01 55
3319 00 00 14
3322 00 01 82
3323 00 00 76
3316 00 01 15
3317 00 09 32
3312 00 02 97
3313 00 00 10
3307 00 04 59
3311 00 01 98
5674 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3310 00 02 60
3309 00 06 38
3353 00 02 50
3354 00 04 86
3352 00 08 48
3350 00 09 92
3348 00 00 10
3349 00 00 89
3371 00 05 46
3372 00 02 81
3373 00 02 95
3374 00 07 33
3375 00 02 11
3420 00 00 24
3421 00 00 54
3422 00 04 30
3423 00 00 10
3426 00 00 34
3417 00 02 45
3416 00 00 83
3415 00 01 33
3414 00 02 69
3174 00 01 11
3173 00 00 69
3166 00 00 10
3165 00 04 90
3164 00 00 74
3163 00 00 71
3162 00 00 49
3123 00 00 43
3122 00 03 37
3121 00 00 45
3109 00 00 85
3112 00 13 43
3111 00 15 75
MATHATENTULIA 380 00 00 11
384 00 03 17
418 00 05 84
417/1598 00 07 33
424 00 06 04
493 00 02 07
594 00 04 33
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5675
593 00 00 43
595 00 01 84
592 00 02 19
596 00 01 33
591 00 03 80
599 00 01 28
557 00 01 55
590 00 01 66
603 00 00 42
558 00 01 40
589 00 00 12
559 00 01 15
532 00 00 10
531 00 03 14
560 00 00 10
524 00 00 58
525 00 01 70
530 00 01 14
529 00 00 10
526 00 01 11
523/1601 00 00 82
523 00 00 35
527 00 00 36
521 00 07 44
508 00 00 71
509 00 03 34
510 00 00 10
BARIDA 2396 00 00 71
2395 00 00 38
2391 00 03 37
2390 00 03 10
2336 00 00 56
2337 00 03 64
2338 00 04 03
2312 00 05 73
2302 00 00 90
2303 00 04 62
2301 00 00 10
2305 00 00 15
2304 00 03 71
2288 00 02 16
2246 00 01 23
5676 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2287 00 01 452286 00 03 30 2283 00 00 42
2285 00 01 44 2284 00 01 69 2253 00 03 74 2252 00 01 40 2254 00 01 98 2218 00 00 11 2255 00 01 67 2256 00 01 34 2257 00 00 10 2181 00 05 47 2182 00 00 24 2180 00 01 22 2179 00 01 98 2178 00 00 20 2176 00 00 69 2183 00 00 10 2175 00 03 48 2173 00 00 11 2174 00 00 44 2104 00 00 10 2103 00 01 66 2105 00 02 38 2106 00 00 74 2107 00 00 10 2102 00 00 75 2110 00 01 75 2100 00 00 12 2111 00 01 68 2113 00 01 61 2112 00 03 76 2114 00 00 10 2115 00 01 14 2116 00 03 43 2117 00 00 51 2120 00 00 12 2156 00 04 60 2155 00 04 04 2154 00 02 89 2134 00 00 74[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5677 2135 00 02 52 2133 00 00 10
2151/10329 00 00 10 2136 00 02 42 2137 00 00 10 2087 00 01 64 1847 00 00 29 1848 00 04 03 1849 00 01 58 1845 00 02 39 1844 00 01 10 1843 00 01 87 1842 00 00 93 1837 00 00 89 1838 00 02 11 1839 00 00 70 1818 00 00 86 1829 00 01 61 1815 00 00 10 1819 00 00 85 1820 00 01 85 1822 00 03 32 1828 00 00 10 1827 00 00 10 1821 00 00 29 1824 00 00 57 1823 00 04 29 1803 00 01 04 1872 00 01 80 1784 00 01 51 1783 00 00 10 1785 00 01 92 1786 00 04 02 1787 00 00 10 1788 00 01 00 1789 00 04 46 1792 00 00 34 1790 00 06 33 1791 00 00 38 1764 00 01 59 1765 00 02 06 1768 00 02 375678 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1762 00 03 12 1766 00 01 10 1761 00 07 91
7892 00 01 68 8343 00 00 43 8342 00 06 77 8341 00 00 15 8340 00 00 76 8346 00 00 57 8347 00 02 50 8348 00 02 81 8349 00 00 50 8387 00 04 11 8386 00 01 56 8391 00 08 33 8442 00 00 93 8392 00 01 23 8437 00 01 75 8436 00 01 94 8395 00 00 39 8438 00 00 10 8435 00 00 18 8434 00 00 32 8433 00 00 62 8429 00 00 84 8430 00 02 03 8431 00 00 22 8428 00 00 42 8427 00 00 10 8425 00 02 57 8424 00 04 04 8468 00 01 01 8423 00 00 18 8419 00 00 72 8471 00 03 15 8470 00 02 11 8472 00 01 96 8474 00 02 62 8475 00 00 10 8473 00 00 10 8652 00 01 83 8748 00 01 16[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5679 8783 00 03 78 8784 00 00 10
8778 00 01 24
8777 00 00 12
8782 00 00 54
8781 00 00 61
8779 00 02 42
8774 00 00 10
8773 00 02 15
8780 00 01 57
8772 00 00 10
SANTRAPALLI 3304 00 02 75
3069 00 00 33
3072 00 03 31
3073 00 02 01
3073/3410 00 02 30
3076 00 01 42
3077 00 01 73
3080 00 03 78
3081 00 03 22
3084 00 03 57
3085 00 01 19
3086 00 01 17
3087 00 00 68
3088 00 00 30
3089 00 00 10
3101 00 05 63
3100 00 00 38
3102 00 01 98
3103 00 00 10
3099 00 02 11
3104 00 01 30
3130 00 00 29
3129 00 01 62
3128 00 01 01
3127 00 00 16
3131 00 03 02
3126 00 03 16
3140 00 00 10
3143 00 01 52
3125 00 00 41
3144 00 01 32
5680 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3147 00 00 10
3145 00 01 99
3146 00 01 75
3148 00 00 10
3161 00 02 14
3162 00 02 24
3164 00 00 14
3163 00 01 33
3167 00 00 10
3170 00 02 30
3171 00 01 91
3169 00 00 88
3172 00 00 67
3173 00 02 22
3174 00 00 97
3211 00 00 10
3210 00 01 66
3209 00 00 60
3175 00 00 11
3191 00 04 29
3188 00 00 10
3189 00 00 88
3208 00 00 10
3190 00 01 44
3196 00 03 63
3192 00 00 10
3195 00 02 93
3197 00 02 70
3198 00 01 92
3200 00 01 08
2881 00 05 41
2881/3335 00 01 95
KUSHAPALLI 595 00 03 31
592 00 01 73
593 00 00 23
594 00 01 09
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5681
609 00 00 10
586 00 03 04
587 00 03 53 583 00 00 41 584 00 04 87 585 00 00 99 581 00 00 13 582 00 05 74 579 00 03 27 550 00 00 46 578 00 01 24 576 00 03 41 575 00 00 70 577 00 02 65 553 00 01 92 562 00 01 18 563 00 00 11 561 00 05 28 558 00 04 05 559 00 01 12 644 00 01 24 797 00 01 74 796 00 02 19 795 00 00 10 799 00 01 62 800 00 03 19 801 00 00 10 804 00 00 78 807 00 02 89 808 00 03 24 806 00 03 87 1056 00 04 80 1057 00 00 68 1055 00 04 47 1017 00 00 18 1018 00 03 595682 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1021 00 00 34 1022 00 04 03 1054 00 00 79
1023 00 03 09
1024 00 02 55
1025 00 05 55
1029 00 03 41
1031 00 03 35
1032 00 02 87
1033 00 02 32
1035 00 02 72
1034 00 05 62
1036 00 00 21
989 00 03 40
988 00 03 07
990 00 00 29
987 00 00 29
BALIAPALLI 540 00 04 48
544 00 00 27
538 00 01 03
537 00 00 77
539 00 05 88
531 00 00 55
532 00 01 62
533 00 01 42
528 00 03 12
527 00 00 57
526 00 00 66
525 00 00 10
534 00 00 33
546 00 00 10
548 00 04 18
518 00 01 08
517 00 00 51
549 00 05 39
513 00 00 14
547 00 00 10
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5683नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2021202120212021....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांति, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर , शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील-हिंजिलिकाटु | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
पुड़िंग 40 00 00 10
39 00 03 41
35 00 06 44
36 00 00 89
34 00 00 77
2397 00 01 97
2396 00 00 34
2398 00 00 10
2399 00 03 31
2395 00 00 83
2392 00 05 25
2393 00 02 03
2391 00 00 93
2389 00 08 60
2390 00 00 10
2390/4159 00 00 10
5684 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2388 00 00 10
2387 00 01 47 2386 00 04 59 2385 00 02 28 2362 00 00 16 1606 00 03 77 2361 00 06 37 1607 00 00 93 2360 00 02 57 2359 00 00 30 1608 00 03 55 1609 00 04 88 1610 00 01 26 2173 00 07 79 2174 00 13 45 2169 00 00 10 2177 00 03 32 2176 00 01 06 2178 00 05 11 2186 00 01 78 2184 00 03 15 2185 00 04 46 2203 00 08 94 2201 00 04 56 2196 00 00 29 2200 00 01 09 2197 00 05 52 2199 00 01 08 2198 00 02 23 2215 00 00 10 2215/3967 00 00 10 2112 00 02 34 2116 00 03 71 2111 00 01 26 2117 00 01 77[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5685 2118 00 03 43
2095 00 07 14 2097 00 00 57 2096 00 03 47 2100 00 02 98 2081 00 00 22 2080 00 04 19 2077 00 03 71 2075 00 00 10 2074 00 02 87 2070/3226 00 03 88 2072 00 02 74 2066 00 00 10 2065 00 04 51 2064 00 00 19 2064/4055 00 00 63 2637 00 00 10 2638 00 03 54 2670 00 03 71 2669 00 01 26 2669/3958 00 01 33 2671 00 00 63 2668 00 05 64 2675 00 00 26 2676 00 10 76 2678 00 01 16 2680 00 05 54 2682 00 02 24 2823 00 01 98 2817 00 02 66 2816 00 00 21 2818 00 05 33 2815 00 00 10 2819 00 02 03 2814 00 02 235686 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2820 00 00 23 2813 00 02 83
2812 00 04 06
2811 00 00 25
2841 00 04 88
2840 00 02 83
2837 00 00 95
2843 00 05 69
2846 00 00 17
2845 00 03 36
2844 00 04 68
2855 00 00 56
2861 00 03 46
2857 00 00 10
2860 00 01 36
2883 00 03 45
2864 00 06 86
2872 00 02 99
2866 00 01 28
2867 00 02 68
2868 00 08 12
2869 00 03 20
2997 00 03 30
2998 00 01 09
2999 00 05 74
3001 00 15 65
2999/3865 00 01 06
3000 00 05 49
3002/3899 00 00 94
3007 00 02 02
3008 00 09 84
3012 00 00 83
3012/3870 00 02 10
सिंगिपुर 20 00 17 81
21 00 08 84
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5687
49 00 02 13
33 00 01 27
50 00 01 48 52 00 00 45 48 00 00 69 45 00 00 88 44 00 01 51 53 00 03 35 56 00 01 49 55 00 01 49 54 00 01 16 65 00 01 93 66 00 03 04 67 00 00 87 72 00 00 14 71 00 00 76 70 00 04 66 69 00 01 33 80 00 05 70 81 00 00 10 1316/1888 00 03 25 1307 00 00 35 1308 00 04 11 1308/2010 00 03 14 1314 00 00 18 1313 00 05 00 1381 00 01 45 1312 00 00 29 1382 00 02 03 1390 00 01 51 1383 00 00 63 1389 00 02 62 1388 00 00 14 1397 00 06 46 1405 00 01 425688 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1410 00 03 11 1404 00 01 42 1415 00 03 04 1414 00 08 13 1429 00 00 21 1430 00 01 15 1431 00 02 16 1434 00 02 88 1435 00 03 53 1436 00 03 06 1439 00 01 20 1437 00 00 30 1438 00 01 83 1438/1927 00 01 12 1450 00 00 87 1219 00 00 10 1218 00 03 35 1451 00 03 01 1452 00 00 24 1212 00 02 05 1211 00 00 81 1213 00 02 00 1210 00 00 10 1214 00 00 14 1209 00 02 18 1208 00 01 93 1207 00 00 43 1200 00 01 39 1128 00 00 14 1130 00 02 32 1131 00 01 30 1132 00 00 10 1133 00 03 18 1194 00 00 10 1193/1942 00 05 06[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5689 1193 00 03 78 1192 00 00 47
1191 00 01 89 1187 00 10 73 1186 00 00 54 1185 00 00 10 1182 00 03 00 1181 00 02 79 1180 00 03 42 1164 00 00 92 1165 00 01 00 1173 00 02 07 1172 00 02 04 1167 00 00 69 1168 00 00 44 1169 00 00 32 1170 00 00 10 1171 00 08 57 1171/1900 00 03 62 1530 00 04 55 1539 00 01 03 1538 00 02 72 1538/2003 00 03 96 1538/1903 00 03 05 1537 00 00 10 1546 00 12 00 1554 00 00 81 1571 00 01 63 1555 00 02 49 1555/2004 00 01 74 1569 00 00 10 1568 00 04 77 1566 00 00 84 1567 00 01 22 1576 00 01 055690 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1577 00 02 54
1575 00 03 10
1582 00 06 34
1585 00 00 15
1584 00 00 28
1583 00 06 62
1599 00 06 18
1596 00 00 12
1598 00 06 19
1615 00 05 37
1616 00 04 64
1623 00 04 43
1624 00 05 34
1625 00 08 68
1633 00 01 12
1632 00 00 70
1631 00 04 85
1630 00 00 59
1637 00 02 40
1637/2052 00 02 39
1636 00 00 10
1645 00 03 59
1649 00 05 09
1648 00 04 22
1651 00 00 23
हिंजिलि 3520 00 09 97
3526 00 07 93
3525 00 02 66
3524 00 01 80
3523 00 04 96
समपुर 167 00 02 30
154/1452 00 05 76
154 00 00 10
153 00 00 32
154/1451 00 02 65
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5691
166 00 00 12
166/1830 00 00 15
158 00 03 00
157 00 03 82
156 00 04 44
155 00 00 40
155/1769 00 00 24
155/1759 00 00 11
159 00 03 55
202 00 02 82
203 00 01 44
204 00 01 65
312 00 01 31
311 00 02 76
310 00 01 16
310/1394 00 00 85
309 00 02 37
309/1460 00 01 48
308 00 00 76
308/1467 00 03 00
307 00 05 32
269 00 01 10
269/1781 00 00 17
269/1782 00 00 21
269/1783 00 00 10
269/1784 00 00 22
269/1785 00 00 10
255 00 04 64
255/2042 00 06 59
256/1293 00 00 10
256/1386 00 03 32
256 00 00 22
256/1686/2124 00 00 10
257 00 07 60
457 00 03 78
5692 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
461 00 09 08
462 00 01 20
462/1749 00 01 49
464 00 05 49
463/1469 00 01 71
474 00 01 00
473 00 00 90
476 00 00 40
478 00 00 18
477 00 01 12
477/1797 00 01 12
477/1824 00 02 61
488 00 08 91
488/1961 00 02 34
488/1962 00 02 20
489 00 09 25
पोिचिलमा 131 00 01 89
130 00 07 86
134/2675 00 08 70
134/2843 00 01 07
129 00 00 64
129/2842 00 00 65
127 00 02 55
135 00 07 63
136/2669 00 04 25
136 00 01 24
137 00 00 10
116 00 02 07
116/2855 00 02 67
138 00 05 08
115 00 00 83
139 00 03 75
114 00 00 64
112 00 09 11
110 00 03 27
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5693
111 00 03 78
103 00 04 63
103/2660 00 02 74 104 00 00 67 106/2674 00 04 02 106 00 04 00 1479 00 07 28 1476 00 04 09 1476/2784 00 02 88 1476/2785 00 02 88 1476/2831 00 01 44 1476/2832 00 01 44 1476/2833 00 00 45 1476/2834 00 00 72 1476/2835 00 00 72 1476/3786 00 00 41 1471 00 04 40 1471/2814 00 07 46 1475 00 08 26 1505 00 19 41 1516 00 02 96 1515 00 00 10 1507 00 07 00 1569 00 00 91 1622 00 01 65 1620 00 04 92 1621 00 08 35 1619 00 00 46 1613/2683 00 00 70 1628 00 08 87 1629 00 00 50 1630/2656 00 06 85 1630/2657 00 05 66 1630/2218 00 00 46 1635 00 03 395694 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1634 00 03 13 1636 00 01 03
1681 00 01 38
1682 00 01 14
1680 00 16 01
1679 00 04 90
1677 00 04 89
1671 00 06 55
1676 00 01 21
1676/2817 00 00 74
1672 00 06 79
1667 00 10 93
1666 00 01 04
1664 00 00 14
मकरझोल 498 00 05 69
499 00 09 71
493 00 04 67
492 00 04 38
490 00 04 24
489 00 02 85
488/8704 00 00 55
489/8703 00 00 44
487 00 01 28
486 00 00 10
485 00 09 65
487/9293 00 01 94
482 00 04 86
481 00 02 48
307/8626 00 06 08
320 00 02 01
321 00 03 99
319 00 00 10
322 00 17 82
323 00 08 88
327 00 04 13
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5695
330 00 00 60
329 00 01 04
328 00 02 81 327/9295 00 02 11 338 00 04 78 341 00 03 92 339 00 00 35 340 00 00 74 285 00 13 51 292 00 00 31 286 00 02 24 273 00 02 35 281 00 04 99 280 00 02 77 279 00 04 12 278 00 03 00 210 00 00 48 3698 00 05 55 3700 00 01 61 3699 00 04 03 3701/8358 00 00 46 3805 00 07 57 3806 00 02 86 3803 00 03 46 3798 00 11 77 3799 00 00 14 3795 00 00 13 3796 00 01 42 3797 00 00 97 3788 00 00 10 3789 00 01 31 3782 00 01 66 3775 00 02 00 3778 00 00 20 3764/8717 00 01 755696 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3764 00 00 12
3756 00 01 00 3756/8653 00 02 59 4132 00 00 87 3756/8431 00 00 97 4128 00 00 42 4131/8531 00 00 55 4131 00 00 20 4130 00 00 21 4129 00 00 69 4154 00 01 18 4153 00 00 25 4156 00 00 10 4155/8640 00 00 90 4155 00 00 52 4171 00 00 86 4170 00 00 48 4185 00 00 12 4184/8720 00 00 66 4184 00 00 87 4183 00 00 69 4263 00 00 84 4264/9220 00 00 10 4283/9221 00 00 22 4262 00 00 98 4285 00 00 96 4285/9223 00 00 30 4284 00 00 54 4287 00 00 85 4286 00 00 47 4234 00 01 38 4233 00 02 56 4301 00 00 10 4315 00 00 20 4316 00 00 46[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5697 4223 00 00 10 4332 00 02 24
4331 00 00 63 4349 00 00 10 4348 00 01 79 4347 00 01 46 4346 00 00 51 4359 00 01 28 4378 00 00 25 4377 00 00 38 4381 00 00 46 4382 00 00 10 4383 00 00 22 4380 00 00 72 4379 00 00 22 4388 00 00 64 4387 00 00 69 4386 00 00 81 4394 00 00 62 4393 00 00 54 4402 00 00 50 4401 00 00 81 4405 00 00 85 4406 00 02 73 4407 00 00 38 4442 00 06 47 4469 00 01 03 4485 00 03 98 4468 00 00 26 4467 00 00 10 4457 00 00 76 4459 00 04 62 4456 00 00 93 4460 00 01 28 4453 00 01 745698 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4461 00 00 754462 00 01 47
4455 00 01 89 4454 00 02 25 4463 00 00 31 4464 00 00 74 4522 00 02 76 4523 00 01 67 4518 00 00 20 4521 00 01 14 4535 00 01 53 4520 00 01 73 4519 00 01 80 4536 00 01 81 4545 00 03 86 4544 00 02 33 4543 00 08 09 4542 00 00 13 4925 00 05 07 4926/8491 00 00 36 4927 00 01 11 4926 00 00 22 4937 00 03 76 4945 00 03 95 4946 00 03 73 4944 00 00 10 4947 00 00 17 4348 00 01 22 4949 00 02 80 4954 00 11 09 4956 00 00 15 6807 00 04 40 6806 00 00 39 6805 00 02 04 6759 00 00 44[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5699
6760 00 01 18 6803 00 04 28 6761 00 02 48 6801 00 00 77 6762 00 04 76 6763 00 00 10 6765 00 00 36 6800 00 00 17 6766 00 10 27 6775 00 00 62 6774 00 00 64 6767 00 04 19 6768 00 02 03 6769 00 00 94 6749 00 01 91 6748 00 02 17 6751 00 03 46 6751/9378 00 00 48 6750 00 02 80 6474 00 01 87 6473 00 01 06 6472 00 00 88 6211 00 01 76 6212 00 00 57 6214 00 00 10 6213 00 02 45 6227 00 01 74 6226 00 08 25 6227 00 01 74 6228 00 00 32 6396 00 00 77 6395 00 04 85 6394 00 02 32 6400 00 00 26 6401 00 01 385700 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6401/8282 00 01 686391 00 00 10 6388/8312 00 01 21 739/8388 00 01 91 6907/8387 00 02 80 5939/8384 00 02 41
6385 00 00 40
6383 00 07 35
6382 00 02 20
6381 00 00 10
6320 00 04 54
6258 00 00 10
6309 00 01 33
6310 00 03 75
6311 00 03 09
6318 00 02 13
6317 00 03 21
6315 00 03 60
6314 00 00 39 बड़खWिड 49 00 00 95
8 00 05 65
9 00 00 20
7 00 01 72
6 00 01 15
5 00 00 85
4 00 00 57
27 00 00 30
10 00 00 94
11 00 02 69
12 00 05 39
13 00 00 85
14 00 02 80
15 00 01 78
23 00 01 16
16 00 00 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5701 17 00 00 71 20 00 00 92
21 00 06 91 22 00 00 43 19/7266 00 00 54 19 00 00 69 18 00 00 61
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2021.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil: HINJILIKATU | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
PUDING 40 00 00 10
39 00 03 41
35 00 06 44
36 00 00 89
34 00 00 77
2397 00 01 97
2396 00 00 34
2398 00 00 10
2399 00 03 31
5702 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2395 00 00 83
2392 00 05 25
2393 00 02 03 2391 00 00 93 2389 00 08 60 2390 00 00 10 2390/4159 00 00 10 2388 00 00 10 2387 00 01 47 2386 00 04 59 2385 00 02 28 2362 00 00 16 1606 00 03 77 2361 00 06 37 1607 00 00 93 2360 00 02 57 2359 00 00 30 1608 00 03 55 1609 00 04 88 1610 00 01 26 2173 00 07 79 2174 00 13 45 2169 00 00 10 2177 00 03 32 2176 00 01 06 2178 00 05 11 2186 00 01 78 2184 00 03 15 2185 00 04 46 2203 00 08 94 2201 00 04 56 2196 00 00 29 2200 00 01 09 2197 00 05 52 2199 00 01 08 2198 00 02 23[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5703 2215 00 00 10 2215/3967 00 00 10
2112 00 02 34 2116 00 03 71 2111 00 01 26 2117 00 01 77 2118 00 03 43 2095 00 07 14 2097 00 00 57 2096 00 03 47 2100 00 02 98 2081 00 00 22 2080 00 04 19 2077 00 03 71 2075 00 00 10 2074 00 02 87 2070/3226 00 03 88 2072 00 02 74 2066 00 00 10 2065 00 04 51 2064 00 00 19 2064/4055 00 00 63 2637 00 00 10 2638 00 03 54 2670 00 03 71 2669 00 01 26 2669/3958 00 01 33 2671 00 00 63 2668 00 05 64 2675 00 00 26 2676 00 10 76 2678 00 01 16 2680 00 05 54 2682 00 02 24 2823 00 01 98 2817 00 02 665704 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2816 00 00 21 2818 00 05 33
2815 00 00 10 2819 00 02 03 2814 00 02 23 2820 00 00 23 2813 00 02 83 2812 00 04 06 2811 00 00 25 2841 00 04 88 2840 00 02 83 2837 00 00 95 2843 00 05 69 2846 00 00 17 2845 00 03 36 2844 00 04 68 2855 00 00 56 2861 00 03 46 2857 00 00 10 2860 00 01 36 2883 00 03 45 2864 00 06 86 2872 00 02 99 2866 00 01 28 2867 00 02 68 2868 00 08 12 2869 00 03 20 2997 00 03 30 2998 00 01 09 2999 00 05 74 3001 00 15 65 2999/3865 00 01 06 3000 00 05 49 3002/3899 00 00 94 3007 00 02 02 3008 00 09 84[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5705 3012 00 00 83 3012/3870 00 02 10
SINGIPUR 20 00 17 81
21 00 08 84
49 00 02 13
33 00 01 27
50 00 01 48
52 00 00 45
48 00 00 69
45 00 00 88
44 00 01 51
53 00 03 35
56 00 01 49
55 00 01 49
54 00 01 16
65 00 01 93
66 00 03 04
67 00 00 87
72 00 00 14
71 00 00 76
70 00 04 66
69 00 01 33
80 00 05 70
81 00 00 10
1316/1888 00 03 25
1307 00 00 35
1308 00 04 11
1308/2010 00 03 14
1314 00 00 18
1313 00 05 00
1381 00 01 45
1312 00 00 29
1382 00 02 03
1390 00 01 51
1383 00 00 63
1389 00 02 62
5706 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1388 00 00 14
1397 00 06 46
1405 00 01 42 1410 00 03 11 1404 00 01 42 1415 00 03 04 1414 00 08 13 1429 00 00 21 1430 00 01 15 1431 00 02 16 1434 00 02 88 1435 00 03 53 1436 00 03 06 1439 00 01 20 1437 00 00 30 1438 00 01 83 1438/1927 00 01 12 1450 00 00 87 1219 00 00 10 1218 00 03 35 1451 00 03 01 1452 00 00 24 1212 00 02 05 1211 00 00 81 1213 00 02 00 1210 00 00 10 1214 00 00 14 1209 00 02 18 1208 00 01 93 1207 00 00 43 1200 00 01 39 1128 00 00 14 1130 00 02 32 1131 00 01 30 1132 00 00 10 1133 00 03 18[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5707 1194 00 00 10 1193/1942 00 05 06
1193 00 03 78 1192 00 00 47 1191 00 01 89 1187 00 10 73 1186 00 00 54 1185 00 00 10 1182 00 03 00 1181 00 02 79 1180 00 03 42 1164 00 00 92 1165 00 01 00 1173 00 02 07 1172 00 02 04 1167 00 00 69 1168 00 00 44 1169 00 00 32 1170 00 00 10 1171 00 08 57 1171/1900 00 03 62 1530 00 04 55 1539 00 01 03 1538 00 02 72 1538/2003 00 03 96 1538/1903 00 03 05 1537 00 00 10 1546 00 12 00 1554 00 00 81 1571 00 01 63 1555 00 02 49 1555/2004 00 01 74 1569 00 00 10 1568 00 04 77 1566 00 00 84 1567 00 01 225708 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1576 00 01 05 1577 00 02 54
1575 00 03 10
1582 00 06 34
1585 00 00 15
1584 00 00 28
1583 00 06 62
1599 00 06 18
1596 00 00 12
1598 00 06 19
1615 00 05 37
1616 00 04 64
1623 00 04 43
1624 00 05 34
1625 00 08 68
1633 00 01 12
1632 00 00 70
1631 00 04 85
1630 00 00 59
1637 00 02 40
1637/2052 00 02 39
1636 00 00 10
1645 00 03 59
1649 00 05 09
1648 00 04 22
1651 00 00 23
HINJILI 3520 00 09 97
3526 00 07 93
3525 00 02 66
3524 00 01 80
3523 00 04 96
SAMPUR 167 00 02 30
154/1452 00 05 76
154 00 00 10
153 00 00 32
154/1451 00 02 65
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5709
166 00 00 12
166/1830 00 00 15
158 00 03 00
157 00 03 82
156 00 04 44
155 00 00 40
155/1769 00 00 24
155/1759 00 00 11
159 00 03 55
202 00 02 82
203 00 01 44
204 00 01 65
312 00 01 31
311 00 02 76
310 00 01 16
310/1394 00 00 85
309 00 02 37
309/1460 00 01 48
308 00 00 76
308/1467 00 03 00
307 00 05 32
269 00 01 10
269/1781 00 00 17
269/1782 00 00 21
269/1783 00 00 10
269/1784 00 00 22
269/1785 00 00 10
255 00 04 64
255/2042 00 06 59
256/1293 00 00 10
256/1386 00 03 32
256 00 00 22
256/1686/2124 00 00 10
257 00 07 60
457 00 03 78
461 00 09 08
5710 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
462 00 01 20
462/1749 00 01 49
464 00 05 49
463/1469 00 01 71
474 00 01 00
473 00 00 90
476 00 00 40
478 00 00 18
477 00 01 12
477/1797 00 01 12
477/1824 00 02 61
488 00 08 91
488/1961 00 02 34
488/1962 00 02 20
489 00 09 25
POCHILIMA 131 00 01 89
130 00 07 86
134/2675 00 08 70
134/2843 00 01 07
129 00 00 64
129/2842 00 00 65
127 00 02 55
135 00 07 63
136/2669 00 04 25
136 00 01 24
137 00 00 10
116 00 02 07
116/2855 00 02 67
138 00 05 08
115 00 00 83
139 00 03 75
114 00 00 64
112 00 09 11
110 00 03 27
111 00 03 78
103 00 04 63
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5711
103/2660 00 02 74
104 00 00 67
106/2674 00 04 02 106 00 04 00 1479 00 07 28 1476 00 04 09 1476/2784 00 02 88 1476/2785 00 02 88 1476/2831 00 01 44 1476/2832 00 01 44 1476/2833 00 00 45 1476/2834 00 00 72 1476/2835 00 00 72 1476/3786 00 00 41 1471 00 04 40 1471/2814 00 07 46 1475 00 08 26 1505 00 19 41 1516 00 02 96 1515 00 00 10 1507 00 07 00 1569 00 00 91 1622 00 01 65 1620 00 04 92 1621 00 08 35 1619 00 00 46 1613/2683 00 00 70 1628 00 08 87 1629 00 00 50 1630/2656 00 06 85 1630/2657 00 05 66 1630/2218 00 00 46 1635 00 03 39 1634 00 03 13 1636 00 01 03 1681 00 01 385712 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1682 00 01 14
1680 00 16 01
1679 00 04 90
1677 00 04 89
1671 00 06 55
1676 00 01 21
1676/2817 00 00 74
1672 00 06 79
1667 00 10 93
1666 00 01 04
1664 00 00 14
MAKARAJHOL 498 00 05 69
499 00 09 71
493 00 04 67
492 00 04 38
490 00 04 24
489 00 02 85
488/8704 00 00 55
489/8703 00 00 44
487 00 01 28
486 00 00 10
485 00 09 65
487/9293 00 01 94
482 00 04 86
481 00 02 48
307/8626 00 06 08
320 00 02 01
321 00 03 99
319 00 00 10
322 00 17 82
323 00 08 88
327 00 04 13
330 00 00 60
329 00 01 04
328 00 02 81
327/9295 00 02 11
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5713
338 00 04 78341 00 03 92
339 00 00 35 340 00 00 74 285 00 13 51 292 00 00 31 286 00 02 24 273 00 02 35 281 00 04 99 280 00 02 77 279 00 04 12 278 00 03 00 210 00 00 48 3698 00 05 55 3700 00 01 61 3699 00 04 03 3701/8358 00 00 46 3805 00 07 57 3806 00 02 86 3803 00 03 46 3798 00 11 77 3799 00 00 14 3795 00 00 13 3796 00 01 42 3797 00 00 97 3788 00 00 10 3789 00 01 31 3782 00 01 66 3775 00 02 00 3778 00 00 20 3764/8717 00 01 75 3764 00 00 12 3756 00 01 00 3756/8653 00 02 59 4132 00 00 87 3756/8431 00 00 975714 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4128 00 00 42 4131/8531 00 00 55
4131 00 00 20 4130 00 00 21 4129 00 00 69 4154 00 01 18 4153 00 00 25 4156 00 00 10 4155/8640 00 00 90 4155 00 00 52 4171 00 00 86 4170 00 00 48 4185 00 00 12 4184/8720 00 00 66 4184 00 00 87 4183 00 00 69 4263 00 00 84 4264/9220 00 00 10 4283/9221 00 00 22 4262 00 00 98 4285 00 00 96 4285/9223 00 00 30 4284 00 00 54 4287 00 00 85 4286 00 00 47 4234 00 01 38 4233 00 02 56 4301 00 00 10 4315 00 00 20 4316 00 00 46 4223 00 00 10 4332 00 02 24 4331 00 00 63 4349 00 00 10 4348 00 01 79 4347 00 01 46[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5715 4346 00 00 51 4359 00 01 28
4378 00 00 25 4377 00 00 38 4381 00 00 46 4382 00 00 10 4383 00 00 22 4380 00 00 72 4379 00 00 22 4388 00 00 64 4387 00 00 69 4386 00 00 81 4394 00 00 62 4393 00 00 54 4402 00 00 50 4401 00 00 81 4405 00 00 85 4406 00 02 73 4407 00 00 38 4442 00 06 47 4469 00 01 03 4485 00 03 98 4468 00 00 26 4467 00 00 10 4457 00 00 76 4459 00 04 62 4456 00 00 93 4460 00 01 28 4453 00 01 74 4461 00 00 75 4462 00 01 47 4455 00 01 89 4454 00 02 25 4463 00 00 31 4464 00 00 74 4522 00 02 765716 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4523 00 01 67 4518 00 00 20
4521 00 01 14 4535 00 01 53 4520 00 01 73 4519 00 01 80 4536 00 01 81 4545 00 03 86 4544 00 02 33 4543 00 08 09 4542 00 00 13 4925 00 05 07 4926/8491 00 00 36 4927 00 01 11 4926 00 00 22 4937 00 03 76 4945 00 03 95 4946 00 03 73 4944 00 00 10 4947 00 00 17 4348 00 01 22 4949 00 02 80 4954 00 11 09 4956 00 00 15 6807 00 04 40 6806 00 00 39 6805 00 02 04 6759 00 00 44 6760 00 01 18 6803 00 04 28 6761 00 02 48 6801 00 00 77 6762 00 04 76 6763 00 00 10 6765 00 00 36 6800 00 00 17[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5717 6766 00 10 27 6775 00 00 62
6774 00 00 64 6767 00 04 19 6768 00 02 03 6769 00 00 94 6749 00 01 91 6748 00 02 17 6751 00 03 46 6751/9378 00 00 48 6750 00 02 80 6474 00 01 87 6473 00 01 06 6472 00 00 88 6211 00 01 76 6212 00 00 57 6214 00 00 10 6213 00 02 45 6227 00 01 74 6226 00 08 25 6227 00 01 74 6228 00 00 32 6396 00 00 77 6395 00 04 85 6394 00 02 32 6400 00 00 26 6401 00 01 38 6401/8282 00 01 68 6391 00 00 10 6388/8312 00 01 21 739/8388 00 01 91 6907/8387 00 02 80 5939/8384 00 02 41 6385 00 00 40 6383 00 07 35 6382 00 02 205718 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 6381 00 00 10 6320 00 04 54
6258 00 00 10
6309 00 01 33
6310 00 03 75
6311 00 03 09
6318 00 02 13
6317 00 03 21
6315 00 03 60
6314 00 00 39
BADAKHANDI 49 00 00 95
8 00 05 65
9 00 00 20
7 00 01 72
6 00 01 15
5 00 00 85
4 00 00 57
27 00 00 30
10 00 00 94
11 00 02 69
12 00 05 39
13 00 00 85
14 00 02 80
15 00 01 78
23 00 01 16
16 00 00 83
17 00 00 71
20 00 00 92
21 00 06 91
22 00 00 43
19/7266 00 00 54
19 00 00 69
18 00 00 61
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5719नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2022202220222022....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर , शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील-चिकिटि | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
झिंकिपदर 504 00 02 51
505 00 00 57
506 00 00 61
524 00 03 84
525 00 01 60
554/927 00 02 34
557 00 00 35
903 00 09 40
904 00 01 03
902 00 06 71
905 00 02 28
901 00 07 04
881 00 07 58
870 00 01 34
882 00 07 72
883 00 09 96
886 00 08 22
889 00 02 54
5720 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
888 00 02 18
887 00 00 90
गोबिन्दनगर 1002 00 00 11
1001 00 10 72
999 00 17 53
998 00 06 58
1019 00 03 96
994 00 02 49
1020 00 11 79
993 00 01 12
992 00 01 44
1021 00 08 05
1021/2560 00 03 13
1022 00 00 50
1022/2565 00 00 17
980 00 00 28
979 00 04 31
959 00 01 20
960 00 13 37
963 00 14 44
965 00 00 25
964 00 09 70
963/2306 00 00 98
963/2307 00 02 01
963/2424 00 02 34
950 00 11 64
826 00 09 82
298 00 06 77
301 00 02 88
300 00 04 73
299 00 06 69
304 00 00 10
306 00 06 50
308 00 03 01
307 00 00 10
309 00 01 01
293 00 00 97
290 00 01 26
310 00 00 96
317 00 01 74
289 00 03 35
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5721
319 00 00 94
285 00 11 07 320 00 00 10 321 00 00 10 284 00 01 43 323 00 02 79 283 00 04 40 281 00 03 40 266 00 03 89 267 00 01 00 267/2464 00 03 44 275 00 00 14 274 00 00 72 273 00 03 62 272 00 03 25 271 00 02 35 269 00 01 00 270 00 06 34 245 00 00 10 244 00 04 15 243 00 08 32 242 00 00 42 241 00 13 60 240 00 01 00 240/2511 00 03 13 239 00 04 78 401 00 09 13 390 00 00 10 391 00 05 28 392 00 03 45 400 00 00 51 393 00 03 23 394 00 00 55 399 00 04 79 399/2374 00 03 47 399/2373 00 02 47 395 00 01 42 398 00 00 10 707 00 01 75 561 00 01 66 562 00 02 545722 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
562/2367 00 01 62
562/2465 00 01 15
564 00 01 19
565 00 05 93
566 00 08 21
568 00 09 39
575 00 05 28
576 00 10 43
577 00 10 60
579 00 00 36
578 00 02 95
578/2390 00 03 09
582 00 04 74
583 00 03 70
584 00 06 61
585 00 05 85
1985 00 03 50
2008 00 00 19
2007 00 00 30
2007/2341 00 00 52
2006 00 11 23
2005 00 05 84
2004 00 13 45
2001 00 00 10
2024 00 10 67
2026 00 06 35
2025 00 00 10
2029 00 04 09
2029/2414 00 04 94
2029/2427 00 04 94
2039 00 00 64
2040 00 05 40
2041 00 02 71
2042 00 01 31
पल्ली 266 00 01 42
628 00 03 26
627 00 03 60
627/744 00 02 18
751 00 06 53
633 00 03 54
643 00 02 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5723
644 00 06 09
645 00 00 44
640 00 03 06
650 00 05 24
695 00 01 77
696 00 01 92
694 00 01 39
697 00 03 57
701 00 05 25
703 00 04 54
705 00 06 56
673 00 07 23
673/736 00 01 25
707 00 02 74
670 00 01 39
669 00 00 51
जगन्नाथपुर 337 00 01 21
336 00 00 66
338 00 01 33
339 00 02 38
335 00 00 11
334 00 05 81
322 00 12 60
324 00 00 10
325 00 02 22
326 00 03 51
327 00 02 90
288 00 00 75
287 00 00 41
328 00 04 22
329 00 03 00
277 00 03 61
276 00 04 06
275 00 01 58
275/1223 00 03 89
274 00 04 11
273 00 01 66
251 00 00 17
256 00 03 71
257 00 02 100
255 00 00 10
5724 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
258 00 03 39
269 00 01 49
259 00 07 64
260 00 02 04
205 00 00 49
193 00 05 97
188 00 01 19
191 00 00 59
190 00 02 47
197 00 01 68
182 00 00 64
183 00 11 13
184 00 06 21
708 00 04 42
709 00 05 96
713 00 00 43
712 00 03 06
715 00 04 74
739 00 00 96
738 00 05 54
716 00 00 49
740 00 05 34
741/1166 00 02 64
741 00 02 60
744 00 00 12
743 00 05 06
747 00 00 11
742 00 00 10
757 00 04 81
758 00 02 03
759 00 07 96
767 00 00 14
766 00 04 36
764 00 02 26
763 00 03 77
770 00 03 05
771 00 06 34
773 00 00 17
एरेW[ा 1014 00 05 44
1032 00 00 63
1016 00 01 24
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5725
1031 00 03 90
1030 00 02 52
1029 00 08 77 1033 00 00 95 1028 00 10 73 1035 00 01 54 1037 00 02 27 1038 00 01 52 1039 00 09 22 1041 00 03 07 1040 00 05 30 1044 00 07 32 1045 00 19 67 1046 00 05 40 1047 00 03 75 1075 00 00 51 1074 00 05 82 1103 00 00 10 1073 00 02 54 1053 00 00 47 1054 00 03 32 1055 00 05 80 1058 00 01 12 1056 00 00 10 1057 00 06 11 1060 00 00 83 1061 00 04 21 1064 00 00 10 1062 00 02 27 2164 00 03 59 2163 00 05 60 2162 00 02 46 2165 00 07 59 2160 00 00 18 2152 00 04 70 2151 00 07 29 2153 00 00 23 2150 00 03 02 2149 00 00 11 2116 00 00 86 2110 00 04 685726 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2100 00 11 392102 00 01 01
2099 00 09 07
2098 00 00 73
2097 00 03 89
1990 00 01 74
1991 00 05 17
1992 00 00 67
2038 00 00 39
2037 00 02 19
2036 00 02 06
2043 00 02 92
2035 00 00 12
2044 00 00 10
2045 00 05 28
2046 00 00 25
2047 00 06 12
2049 00 00 18
2048 00 02 50
2058 00 00 37
2027 00 02 00
2059 00 03 25
2060 00 01 09
2061 00 00 54
2062 00 02 90
2067 00 00 14
2063 00 03 71
2064 00 00 10
रामचन्(cid:16)पल्ली 15 00 08 15
16 00 05 01
17 00 00 10
106 00 02 69
107 00 01 48
108 00 00 11
118 00 00 74
118/1736 00 00 74
कृ ष्णनगर 778 00 05 85
777 00 06 02
782 00 00 42
783 00 05 64
784 00 00 42
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5727
785 00 05 35
786 00 01 83
789 00 09 26
769 00 00 59
793 00 01 14
797 00 00 10
794 00 04 78
796 00 06 26
817 00 06 16
809 00 08 98
808 00 01 66
807 00 03 82
854 00 01 34
903 00 05 50
912 00 03 55
905 00 00 38
910 00 04 65
906 00 03 26
908 00 02 05
909 00 03 74
897 00 06 00
दानपुर 158 00 07 30
157 00 04 21
156 00 00 20
159 00 00 34
23 00 00 39
24 00 00 46
25 00 03 86
26 00 01 69
27 00 02 60
36 00 01 38
142 00 00 57
37 00 00 57
114 00 01 60
115 00 01 23
118 00 06 62
119 00 05 96
120 00 00 20
121 00 03 84
122 00 04 50
123 00 00 52
5728 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
110 00 00 85
89 00 07 09
88 00 04 13
87 00 04 39
81 00 01 78
82 00 09 61
85 00 02 64
77 00 05 40
78 00 04 58
75 00 00 10
74 00 00 42
559 00 02 20
560 00 05 09
561 00 00 23
िलमकु िड़आ 649 00 07 36
651 00 05 03
652 00 00 50
653 00 20 70
863 00 07 50
853 00 00 11
854 00 04 75
862 00 04 74
855 00 05 26
856 00 01 74
857 00 05 49
858 00 04 98
848 00 00 10
909 00 01 90
910 00 00 38
911 00 05 34
912 00 00 67
914 00 08 03
799 00 10 10
800 00 00 10
919 00 00 55
797 00 04 54
796 00 03 85
795 00 06 61
929 00 02 79
930 00 03 06
943 00 06 14
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5729
942 00 00 60
934 00 14 36
939 00 01 76
940 00 03 43
937 00 01 15
936 00 02 56
935 00 07 02
गोिपनाथपुर 657 00 03 23
658 00 01 67
780 00 00 98
781 00 03 98
783 00 06 30
783/1034 00 00 10
784 00 00 10
779 00 01 80
778 00 00 73
767 00 00 10
768 00 00 90
773 00 03 58
771 00 04 03
769 00 02 30
770 00 00 16
761 00 01 21
762 00 02 59
763 00 00 21
760 00 03 21
759 00 03 98
756 00 01 56
908 00 00 19
910 00 04 39
912 00 04 07
909 00 02 61
914 00 03 20
915 00 04 71
916 00 01 51
919 00 05 44
920 00 03 41
995 00 12 63
995/1058 00 07 72
996 00 03 85
997 00 04 00
5730 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
999 00 01 26
975 00 25 12 976 00 06 11
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2022.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil: CHIKITI | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
JHINKIPADAR 504 00 02 51
505 00 00 57
506 00 00 61
524 00 03 84
525 00 01 60
554/927 00 02 34
557 00 00 35
903 00 09 40
904 00 01 03
902 00 06 71
905 00 02 28
901 00 07 04
881 00 07 58
870 00 01 34
882 00 07 72
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5731
883 00 09 96
886 00 08 22
889 00 02 54
888 00 02 18
887 00 00 90
GOVINDANAGAR 1002 00 00 11
1001 00 10 72
999 00 17 53
998 00 06 58
1019 00 03 96
994 00 02 49
1020 00 11 79
993 00 01 12
992 00 01 44
1021 00 08 05
1021/2560 00 03 13
1022 00 00 50
1022/2565 00 00 17
980 00 00 28
979 00 04 31
959 00 01 20
960 00 13 37
963 00 14 44
965 00 00 25
964 00 09 70
963/2306 00 00 98
963/2307 00 02 01
963/2424 00 02 34
950 00 11 64
826 00 09 82
298 00 06 77
301 00 02 88
300 00 04 73
299 00 06 69
304 00 00 10
306 00 06 50
308 00 03 01
307 00 00 10
309 00 01 01
293 00 00 97
290 00 01 26
310 00 00 96
5732 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
317 00 01 74 289 00 03 35 319 00 00 94 285 00 11 07 320 00 00 10 321 00 00 10 284 00 01 43 323 00 02 79 283 00 04 40 281 00 03 40 266 00 03 89 267 00 01 00 267/2464 00 03 44 275 00 00 14 274 00 00 72 273 00 03 62 272 00 03 25 271 00 02 35 269 00 01 00 270 00 06 34 245 00 00 10 244 00 04 15 243 00 08 32 242 00 00 42 241 00 13 60 240 00 01 00 240/2511 00 03 13 239 00 04 78 401 00 09 13 390 00 00 10 391 00 05 28 392 00 03 45 400 00 00 51 393 00 03 23 394 00 00 55 399 00 04 79 399/2374 00 03 47 399/2373 00 02 47 395 00 01 42 398 00 00 10 707 00 01 75 561 00 01 66[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5733 562 00 02 54 562/2367 00 01 62
562/2465 00 01 15
564 00 01 19
565 00 05 93
566 00 08 21
568 00 09 39
575 00 05 28
576 00 10 43
577 00 10 60
579 00 00 36
578 00 02 95
578/2390 00 03 09
582 00 04 74
583 00 03 70
584 00 06 61
585 00 05 85
1985 00 03 50
2008 00 00 19
2007 00 00 30
2007/2341 00 00 52
2006 00 11 23
2005 00 05 84
2004 00 13 45
2001 00 00 10
2024 00 10 67
2026 00 06 35
2025 00 00 10
2029 00 04 09
2029/2414 00 04 94
2029/2427 00 04 94
2039 00 00 64
2040 00 05 40
2041 00 02 71
2042 00 01 31
PALLI 266 00 01 42
628 00 03 26
627 00 03 60
627/744 00 02 18
751 00 06 53
633 00 03 54
643 00 02 52
5734 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
644 00 06 09645 00 00 44 640 00 03 06
650 00 05 24
695 00 01 77
696 00 01 92
694 00 01 39
697 00 03 57
701 00 05 25
703 00 04 54
705 00 06 56
673 00 07 23
673/736 00 01 25
707 00 02 74
670 00 01 39
669 00 00 51
JAGANNATHPUR 337 00 01 21
336 00 00 66
338 00 01 33
339 00 02 38
335 00 00 11
334 00 05 81
322 00 12 60
324 00 00 10
325 00 02 22
326 00 03 51
327 00 02 90
288 00 00 75
287 00 00 41
328 00 04 22
329 00 03 00
277 00 03 61
276 00 04 06
275 00 01 58
275/1223 00 03 89
274 00 04 11
273 00 01 66
251 00 00 17
256 00 03 71
257 00 02 100
255 00 00 10
258 00 03 39
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5735
269 00 01 49259 00 07 64
260 00 02 04
205 00 00 49
193 00 05 97
188 00 01 19
191 00 00 59
190 00 02 47
197 00 01 68
182 00 00 64
183 00 11 13
184 00 06 21
708 00 04 42
709 00 05 96
713 00 00 43
712 00 03 06
715 00 04 74
739 00 00 96
738 00 05 54
716 00 00 49
740 00 05 34
741/1166 00 02 64
741 00 02 60
744 00 00 12
743 00 05 06
747 00 00 11
742 00 00 10
757 00 04 81
758 00 02 03
759 00 07 96
767 00 00 14
766 00 04 36
764 00 02 26
763 00 03 77
770 00 03 05
771 00 06 34
773 00 00 17
ERENDRA 1014 00 05 44
1032 00 00 63
1016 00 01 24
1031 00 03 90
1030 00 02 52
5736 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1029 00 08 77
1033 00 00 95
1028 00 10 73
1035 00 01 54 1037 00 02 27 1038 00 01 52 1039 00 09 22 1041 00 03 07 1040 00 05 30 1044 00 07 32 1045 00 19 67 1046 00 05 40 1047 00 03 75 1075 00 00 51 1074 00 05 82 1103 00 00 10 1073 00 02 54 1053 00 00 47 1054 00 03 32 1055 00 05 80 1058 00 01 12 1056 00 00 10 1057 00 06 11 1060 00 00 83 1061 00 04 21 1064 00 00 10 1062 00 02 27 2164 00 03 59 2163 00 05 60 2162 00 02 46 2165 00 07 59 2160 00 00 18 2152 00 04 70 2151 00 07 29 2153 00 00 23 2150 00 03 02 2149 00 00 11 2116 00 00 86 2110 00 04 68 2100 00 11 39 2102 00 01 01 2099 00 09 07[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5737 2098 00 00 73 2097 00 03 89
1990 00 01 74
1991 00 05 17
1992 00 00 67
2038 00 00 39
2037 00 02 19
2036 00 02 06
2043 00 02 92
2035 00 00 12
2044 00 00 10
2045 00 05 28
2046 00 00 25
2047 00 06 12
2049 00 00 18
2048 00 02 50
2058 00 00 37
2027 00 02 00
2059 00 03 25
2060 00 01 09
2061 00 00 54
2062 00 02 90
2067 00 00 14
2063 00 03 71
2064 00 00 10
RAMACHANDRAPALLI 15 00 08 15
16 00 05 01
17 00 00 10
106 00 02 69
107 00 01 48
108 00 00 11
118 00 00 74
118/1736 00 00 74
KRUSHNANAGAR 778 00 05 85
777 00 06 02
782 00 00 42
783 00 05 64
784 00 00 42
785 00 05 35
786 00 01 83
789 00 09 26
769 00 00 59
5738 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
793 00 01 14797 00 00 10 794 00 04 78
796 00 06 26
817 00 06 16
809 00 08 98
808 00 01 66
807 00 03 82
854 00 01 34
903 00 05 50
912 00 03 55
905 00 00 38
910 00 04 65
906 00 03 26
908 00 02 05
909 00 03 74
897 00 06 00
DANAPUR 158 00 07 30
157 00 04 21
156 00 00 20
159 00 00 34
23 00 00 39
24 00 00 46
25 00 03 86
26 00 01 69
27 00 02 60
36 00 01 38
142 00 00 57
37 00 00 57
114 00 01 60
115 00 01 23
118 00 06 62
119 00 05 96
120 00 00 20
121 00 03 84
122 00 04 50
123 00 00 52
110 00 00 85
89 00 07 09
88 00 04 13
87 00 04 39
81 00 01 78
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5739
82 00 09 61
85 00 02 64
77 00 05 40
78 00 04 58
75 00 00 10
74 00 00 42
559 00 02 20
560 00 05 09
561 00 00 23
LIMAKUDIA 649 00 07 36
651 00 05 03
652 00 00 50
653 00 20 70
863 00 07 50
853 00 00 11
854 00 04 75
862 00 04 74
855 00 05 26
856 00 01 74
857 00 05 49
858 00 04 98
848 00 00 10
909 00 01 90
910 00 00 38
911 00 05 34
912 00 00 67
914 00 08 03
799 00 10 10
800 00 00 10
919 00 00 55
797 00 04 54
796 00 03 85
795 00 06 61
929 00 02 79
930 00 03 06
943 00 06 14
942 00 00 60
934 00 14 36
939 00 01 76
940 00 03 43
937 00 01 15
936 00 02 56
5740 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
935 00 07 02
GOPINATHAPUR 657 00 03 23
658 00 01 67
780 00 00 98
781 00 03 98
783 00 06 30
783/1034 00 00 10
784 00 00 10
779 00 01 80
778 00 00 73
767 00 00 10
768 00 00 90
773 00 03 58
771 00 04 03
769 00 02 30
770 00 00 16
761 00 01 21
762 00 02 59
763 00 00 21
760 00 03 21
759 00 03 98
756 00 01 56
908 00 00 19
910 00 04 39
912 00 04 07
909 00 02 61
914 00 03 20
915 00 04 71
916 00 01 51
919 00 05 44
920 00 03 41
995 00 12 63
995/1058 00 07 72
996 00 03 85
997 00 04 00
999 00 01 26
975 00 25 12
976 00 06 11
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5741नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2023202320232023....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है,उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील- आिसका | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
खारिआ 1544 00 02 11
1542 00 18 41
1610 00 03 65
1524 00 00 10
1523 00 00 20
1522 00 00 15
1521 00 00 46
1520 00 00 42
1518 00 00 10
1519 00 00 37
1515 00 00 94
1514 00 01 89
1513 00 01 29
1512 00 02 10
1511 00 00 61
1510 00 02 40
5742 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1505 00 02 03 1509 00 00 18 1506 00 02 73 1500 00 00 47 1491 00 05 73 1170 00 00 33 1169 00 03 21 1160 00 02 09 1166 00 07 87 1164 00 00 78 1165 00 02 99 1163 00 03 40 1162/6434 00 00 11 1132 00 00 42 1127 00 00 49 1126 00 00 98 1125 00 00 10 1128 00 00 88 1131 00 00 50 1130 00 00 45 1129 00 01 39 1124 00 01 11 1115 00 01 06 1112 00 00 10 1116 00 00 84 1117 00 01 76 1114 00 02 06 1070 00 02 32 1073 00 02 44 1071 00 00 33 1072 00 00 54 1074 00 00 40 1066 00 01 13 1063 00 01 77 1062 00 00 22 1065 00 00 99[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5743
1064 00 01 17 1028 00 01 30 1027 00 00 75 1026 00 00 59 1021 00 01 70 1022 00 00 82 1025 00 00 10 1020 00 00 81 1023 00 00 90 1024 00 07 01 1270 00 01 52 684 00 01 99 685 00 02 26 686 00 01 17 684/6443 00 02 41 683 00 04 19 678 00 00 15 682 00 02 59 679 00 01 35 680 00 02 33 681 00 00 96 667 00 00 34 700 00 00 76 699/6913 00 03 99 699/6914 00 05 74 800 00 01 96 799 00 04 80 793 00 05 98 795 00 00 10 792 00 05 07 791 00 00 70 781 00 00 51 782 00 01 15 780 00 00 17 783 00 01 20 778 00 00 105744 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
776 00 00 29777 00 02 81
773 00 06 17 771 00 03 15 772 00 03 13 770 00 02 73 6359 00 04 61 2840 00 07 12 2839/6921 00 00 10 2841 00 02 89 2842 00 01 29 2845 00 00 10 2843 00 02 53 2844 00 02 27 2847 00 00 61 2848 00 01 96 3060 00 01 35 3060/6944 00 03 26 3060/6950 00 01 09 3060/6951 00 01 09 3060/6958 00 00 67 3060/6959 00 00 67 3059 00 01 83 3059/7052 00 06 33 3059/7050 00 06 33 3061 00 01 77 3063 00 00 52 3064 00 00 54 3065 00 00 10 3059/6931 00 06 18 3059/6932 00 05 69 3059/6933 00 06 03 3059/6935 00 11 25 2921 00 02 20 2920 00 08 99 2925 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5745
2934 00 01 96 2919 00 03 88 2917 00 00 22 2916 00 00 64 2915 00 01 50 2914 00 01 01 2913 00 01 55 2910 00 00 29 2980 00 01 33 2979 00 04 92 2978 00 02 50 2977 00 02 61 2953 00 00 10 2976 00 07 82 2997 00 04 37 2975 00 00 57 2974 00 00 43 2973 00 00 17 3001 00 07 07 3000 00 08 20 3007 00 15 53 3008 00 02 88 2321 00 02 13 6021 00 04 74 6207 00 03 77 6283 00 06 83 6284 00 03 82 6281 00 00 49 6278 00 00 10 6282 00 00 55 6247 00 02 01 6248 00 02 52 6249 00 02 78 6253 00 02 04 6254 00 05 00 6255 00 02 375746 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
6256 00 00 80
घटकु रि 1218 00 01 26
1221 00 02 27
1222 00 06 26
1223 00 00 10
1234 00 04 36
1233 00 00 10
1249 00 00 27
1248 00 00 45
1247 00 02 05
1269 00 00 84
1268 00 00 95
1265/3844 00 02 00
1285 00 00 81
1286 00 02 24
1284 00 00 50
1290 00 01 31
1283 00 00 39
1291 00 01 06
1313 00 01 33
1282 00 01 08
1324 00 00 63
1317 00 01 11
1323 00 00 38
1318 00 01 45
1322 00 00 36
1321 00 01 56
1319 00 00 97
1320 00 01 03
1353 00 01 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5747
1371 00 01 74 1354 00 00 54 1355 00 00 10 1356 00 00 49 1369 00 00 45 1368 00 00 65 1358 00 02 45 1367 00 01 07 1366 00 01 03 1359 00 00 28 1365 00 01 88 1408 00 00 32 1364 00 02 66 1422 00 00 13 1409 00 02 83 1407 00 00 10 1410 00 05 74 1419 00 00 40 1418 00 00 28 1417 00 00 45 1416 00 01 32 1413 00 00 10 1414 00 02 27 1415 00 01 94 1465 00 00 31 1464 00 01 33 1463 00 00 12 1462 00 01 45 1461 00 01 40 1460 00 00 725748 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1459 00 00 23 1458 00 01 30 1644 00 03 62 1645 00 03 58 1641 00 03 09 1640 00 03 21 1634 00 02 45 2561 00 02 98 2569 00 03 59 2570 00 03 16 2587 00 00 15 2586 00 02 90 2588 00 00 34 2589 00 03 72 2651 00 01 50 2655 00 01 38 2654 00 00 50 2657 00 02 25 2659 00 00 64 2658 00 01 36 2663 00 00 24 2664 00 03 00 2668 00 01 25 2669 00 01 99 2669/4227 00 00 99 2692 00 01 71 2691 00 03 35 2692/3822 00 01 14 2690 00 02 91 2801 00 06 43[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5749
2802 00 00 38 2803 00 01 88 2799/3877 00 02 01 2798 00 01 90 2797 00 02 26 2790 00 00 11 2791 00 01 32 2786 00 01 74 2777 00 04 71 2773 00 00 66 2775 00 00 83 2774 00 01 46 2766 00 00 35 2765 00 01 37 2763 00 01 05 2762 00 01 07 2761 00 00 97 2760 00 00 96 2759 00 01 55 3373 00 01 95 3366 00 01 79 3365 00 01 73 3363 00 05 87 3363/3845 00 03 52 3356 00 01 28 3357 00 00 39 3353 00 01 65 3352 00 01 33 3351 00 01 54 3350 00 01 495750 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3349 00 01 54
3348 00 01 60
3343 00 01 46
3344 00 01 16
3341 00 01 37
3339 00 00 97
3338 00 01 25
3333 00 01 57
3334 00 00 25
3329 00 01 40
3327 00 00 86
3328 00 00 50
3322 00 00 91
3320 00 00 55
3319 00 00 85
3317 00 01 04
3316 00 00 14
3314 00 01 05
3310 00 02 27
कोटिनड़ा 757 00 06 11
756 00 01 36
758 00 00 19
1296 00 03 47
1297 00 03 00
1298 00 02 83
1301 00 02 72
1302 00 02 78
1341 00 02 73
1345 00 02 87
1200 00 04 16
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5751
1201 00 04 18 1205 00 00 10 1204 00 00 10 1203 00 04 28 1202 00 00 13 1196 00 02 03 1195 00 01 55 1193 00 03 04 1185 00 02 15 1184 00 00 46 1183 00 01 26 1182 00 01 37 1181 00 03 24 1180 00 02 74 1175 00 01 20 1175/1499 00 01 95 1174 00 02 61 1173 00 04 05 1172 00 03 55 1171 00 03 37 1170 00 03 13 1162 00 00 95 1163 00 01 13 1164 00 00 10 1154 00 01 99 1153 00 01 71 1144 00 02 15 1143 00 02 04 1140 00 03 83 1071 00 03 155752 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1091 00 00 45
1092 00 00 36
1072 00 03 15
1090 00 01 60
1089 00 01 88
1093 00 00 20
1085 00 02 22
1094 00 01 98
1098 00 02 17
1097 00 01 03
1099 00 00 37
1096 00 00 10
1101 00 02 60
1102 00 02 85
1105 00 04 43
1106 00 01 92
1107 00 01 97
1109 00 04 02
1110 00 04 08
1421 00 00 10
1427 00 05 83
1426 00 01 96
1422 00 00 15
1425 00 02 20
1423 00 00 10
1424 00 04 04
कु म्भारी 1798 00 00 47
1823 00 00 54
1824 00 01 80
1795 00 01 38
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5753
1843 00 01 98 1844 00 02 35 1845 00 00 73 1846 00 00 44 1848 00 04 89 1847 00 00 67 1769 00 00 87 1768 00 05 35 1759 00 02 59 1758 00 02 37 1734 00 00 10 1735 00 03 18 1736 00 02 08 1737 00 01 72 1738 00 02 47 1711 00 05 75 1739 00 00 41 1693 00 05 55 1694 00 00 55 1696 00 01 66 1695 00 03 10 1654 00 03 89 1653 00 00 14 1515 00 00 20 1652 00 04 26 1651 00 03 69 1650 00 03 70 1551 00 00 10 1649 00 03 46 1578 00 00 105754 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1581 00 04 70 1582 00 00 38 1580 00 02 09 1583 00 02 94 1584 00 00 47 1631 00 04 55 1627 00 00 22 1630 00 01 16 1628 00 02 32 1629 00 03 40 1623 00 00 12 1622 00 01 81 2415 00 01 63 2416 00 02 31 2417 00 02 14 2427 00 09 63 2433 00 00 56 2439 00 01 37 2441 00 00 50 2440 00 02 32 2444 00 07 36 2445 00 00 10 3314 00 00 20 3315 00 02 67 3311 00 02 90 3313 00 02 69 3312 00 01 85 3308 00 03 44 3307 00 04 97 3328 00 03 45[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5755
3329 00 06 83 3331 00 05 08 3382 00 00 17 3380 00 01 81 3381 00 00 10 3379 00 01 93 3377 00 00 10 3438 00 10 28 3375 00 01 74 3447 00 03 89 3448 00 04 10 3476 00 01 98 3460 00 00 52 3459 00 00 45 3458 00 01 32 3463 00 03 17 3464 00 00 10 3467 00 02 61 3469 00 02 71 3468 00 02 92 3475 00 08 25 3508 00 08 71 3509 00 05 52 3521 00 00 78 3522 00 01 02 3733 00 02 16 3877 00 09 92 3878 00 02 64 3874 00 00 47 3876 00 07 975756 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3875 00 03 88
3884 00 04 81
3858 00 05 23
3856 00 02 66
3846 00 01 29
3845 00 01 03
3828 00 03 84
3827 00 01 55
3826 00 03 80
3820 00 02 48
3819 00 01 41
3809 00 00 70
3810 00 02 22
3811 00 03 28
3812 00 02 91
3807 00 03 24
3804 00 01 29
3800 00 02 99
3801 00 02 85
3798 00 00 10
3782 00 03 07
3783 00 02 90
3790 00 09 66
3789 00 10 23
3857 00 02 66
भेंकटराइपली 38 00 01 68
40 00 01 75
41 00 01 56
51 00 01 81
50 00 02 68
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5757
49 00 02 23
48 00 00 94 58 00 04 26 45 00 00 24 59 00 02 46 60 00 02 66 70 00 01 05 71 00 01 15 69 00 00 78 72 00 01 39 83 00 01 66 82 00 01 79 110 00 01 88 109 00 01 37 111 00 00 68 108 00 01 34 113 00 01 47 107 00 00 82 106 00 01 96 101 00 01 77 102 00 01 40 103 00 00 25 99 00 00 10 98 00 03 58 96 00 02 14 130 00 01 77 129 00 03 88 155 00 03 00 156 00 00 10 152 00 00 105758 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
160 00 02 21159 00 00 19
161 00 01 61 165 00 00 91 162 00 00 13 163 00 03 47 164 00 00 78 145 00 03 72 144 00 03 57 146 00 00 10 143 00 06 90 322 00 01 74 343 00 19 52 358 00 00 10 338 00 02 48 343/2209 00 01 49 339 00 00 68 340 00 00 18 341 00 00 18 337 00 01 94 336 00 01 99 332 00 03 96 333 00 04 55 330 00 00 12 576 00 04 01 546 00 01 95 575 00 00 15 575/2220 00 00 10 545 00 03 72 547 00 02 48[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5759 548 00 00 42 553 00 04 42
544 00 06 48
533 00 09 21
533/2232 00 04 06
543 00 01 51
532 00 01 66
531 00 02 75
512 00 01 48
530 00 01 33
523 00 00 70
524 00 02 70
525 00 00 71
526 00 03 78
500 00 06 03
497 00 00 14
498 00 01 31
499 00 04 01
494 00 00 67
मागुर 1979 00 00 96
1981 00 04 66
1982 00 04 01
1978 00 01 82
1991 00 00 10
1990 00 09 51
1989 00 03 36
1993 00 05 65
1992 00 02 40
1948 00 04 54
1946 00 00 23
5760 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1947 00 01 73
तरसिंगि 721 00 01 31
848 00 01 40
849 00 07 29
847 00 00 67
846 00 00 53
845 00 00 63
844 00 00 78
843 00 01 03
842 00 00 77
841 00 00 42
751 00 02 39
850 00 00 14
836 00 06 25
840 00 00 10
835 00 07 96
834 00 02 82
806 00 00 78
805 00 00 12
807 00 01 35
808 00 00 56
810 00 00 51
809 00 00 19
811 00 00 98
812 00 00 20
813 00 00 19
814 00 01 26
815 00 00 94
816 00 00 23
832 00 02 23
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5761
817 00 00 32
818 00 01 77 831 00 01 54 828 00 01 20 827 00 01 83 819 00 02 04 820 00 00 25 821 00 00 52 822 00 02 55 823 00 01 33 824 00 00 85 825 00 00 10 1103 00 02 24 1104 00 01 99 1114 00 03 54 1113 00 04 15 1105 00 03 64 1112 00 04 42 1109 00 01 09 1107 00 00 10 1108 00 04 66 1631 00 00 25 1633 00 06 22 1634 00 04 69 1617 00 04 36 1562 00 00 41 1561 00 01 73 1563 00 02 12 1566 00 01 87 1567 00 00 105762 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1568 00 02 04 1569 00 04 09 1574 00 02 12 1575 00 01 68 1576 00 01 20 1577 00 01 21 1578 00 01 57 1579 00 01 76 1582 00 01 05 1583 00 05 73 1584 00 00 57 1528 00 01 60 1527 00 06 06 1526 00 10 04 1516 00 02 70 1694 00 00 18 1695 00 05 51 1699 00 02 05 1700 00 00 60 1698 00 01 23 1701 00 01 71 1705 00 00 75 1697 00 00 10 1702 00 00 90 1704 00 03 43 1703 00 00 22 1709 00 02 72 1710 00 02 57 1509 00 01 69 1510 00 00 20[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5763
1508 00 01 67
1507 00 03 49
1500 00 00 78
1501 00 00 10
1505 00 01 26
1504 00 02 29
1503 00 00 98
1506 00 02 74
1483 00 00 18
के न्दुपदर 190 00 04 40
189 00 04 03
188 00 03 60
187 00 03 42
186 00 03 23
185 00 00 54
184 00 02 91
167 00 00 42
167/2500 00 03 57
167/2501 00 03 57
154 00 04 65
156 00 05 72
150 00 02 93
130 00 02 75
127 00 01 52
126 00 01 47
76 00 00 10
76/2499 00 01 61
77 00 01 71
78 00 00 53
85 00 00 10
5764 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
79 00 00 10
80 00 01 35 81 00 01 66 82 00 00 62 451 00 05 94 447 00 00 15 446 00 00 96 445 00 02 57 444 00 02 06 443 00 02 68 442 00 00 10 479 00 05 25 481 00 04 92 480 00 00 84 484 00 05 39 429 00 00 29 430 00 02 25 431 00 00 10 428 00 04 98 432 00 01 40 426 00 01 35 229 00 03 25 295 00 00 41 296 00 02 49 297 00 02 39 299 00 00 81 300 00 01 72 309 00 03 02 310 00 02 12 321 00 01 97[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5765
320 00 01 77323 00 02 63
326 00 02 71 329 00 01 82 333 00 02 79 335 00 00 31 336 00 01 01 339 00 03 50 344 00 00 24 343 00 02 82 346 00 00 10 345 00 01 56 350 00 01 83 351 00 02 14 357 00 03 31 358 00 00 50 2106 00 00 50 2103 00 01 58 2102 00 01 99 2101 00 02 28 2104 00 00 10 2100 00 01 12 2099 00 09 17 2117 00 00 10 2118 00 00 47 2094 00 03 00 2095 00 00 44 2093 00 01 37 2121 00 13 74 2119 00 00 445766 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2120 00 02 87
2140 00 13 23
मेWटापड़ा 1295 00 09 90
1316 00 00 58
1804 00 07 18
1812 00 00 44
1811 00 03 95
1809 00 00 28
1810 00 00 51
1822 00 02 00
1823 00 00 53
1824 00 00 52
1826 00 00 84
1827 00 00 10
1830 00 00 89
1841 00 02 96
1854 00 00 10
1855 00 03 10
1857 00 00 41
1858 00 00 57
1856 00 01 08
1859 00 00 78
1861 00 00 23
1860 00 00 36
1867 00 00 10
1870 00 00 50
1869 00 00 65
1868 00 00 12
1865 00 00 41
1873 00 01 31
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5767
1874 00 02 96 1878 00 04 69 1891 00 00 89 1895 00 03 17 1927 00 09 11 1933 00 06 48 1932 00 01 50 1931 00 02 18 1929 00 02 85 3056 00 00 10
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2023.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, AlokBharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : ASKA | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
KHARIA 1544 00 02 11
1542 00 18 41
1610 00 03 65
1524 00 00 10
1523 00 00 20
5768 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1522 00 00 15
1521 00 00 46
1520 00 00 42 1518 00 00 10 1519 00 00 37 1515 00 00 94 1514 00 01 89 1513 00 01 29 1512 00 02 10 1511 00 00 61 1510 00 02 40 1505 00 02 03 1509 00 00 18 1506 00 02 73 1500 00 00 47 1491 00 05 73 1170 00 00 33 1169 00 03 21 1160 00 02 09 1166 00 07 87 1164 00 00 78 1165 00 02 99 1163 00 03 40 1162/6434 00 00 11 1132 00 00 42 1127 00 00 49 1126 00 00 98 1125 00 00 10 1128 00 00 88 1131 00 00 50 1130 00 00 45 1129 00 01 39 1124 00 01 11 1115 00 01 06 1112 00 00 10 1116 00 00 84[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5769 1117 00 01 76 1114 00 02 06
1070 00 02 32 1073 00 02 44 1071 00 00 33 1072 00 00 54 1074 00 00 40 1066 00 01 13 1063 00 01 77 1062 00 00 22 1065 00 00 99 1064 00 01 17 1028 00 01 30 1027 00 00 75 1026 00 00 59 1021 00 01 70 1022 00 00 82 1025 00 00 10 1020 00 00 81 1023 00 00 90 1024 00 07 01 1270 00 01 52 684 00 01 99 685 00 02 26 686 00 01 17 684/6443 00 02 41 683 00 04 19 678 00 00 15 682 00 02 59 679 00 01 35 680 00 02 33 681 00 00 96 667 00 00 34 700 00 00 76 699/6913 00 03 99 699/6914 00 05 745770 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
800 00 01 96799 00 04 80
793 00 05 98 795 00 00 10 792 00 05 07 791 00 00 70 781 00 00 51 782 00 01 15 780 00 00 17 783 00 01 20 778 00 00 10 776 00 00 29 777 00 02 81 773 00 06 17 771 00 03 15 772 00 03 13 770 00 02 73 6359 00 04 61 2840 00 07 12 2839/6921 00 00 10 2841 00 02 89 2842 00 01 29 2845 00 00 10 2843 00 02 53 2844 00 02 27 2847 00 00 61 2848 00 01 96 3060 00 01 35 3060/6944 00 03 26 3060/6950 00 01 09 3060/6951 00 01 09 3060/6958 00 00 67 3060/6959 00 00 67 3059 00 01 83 3059/7052 00 06 33 3059/7050 00 06 33[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5771
3061 00 01 773063 00 00 52
3064 00 00 54 3065 00 00 10 3059/6931 00 06 18 3059/6932 00 05 69 3059/6933 00 06 03 3059/6935 00 11 25 2921 00 02 20 2920 00 08 99 2925 00 00 10 2934 00 01 96 2919 00 03 88 2917 00 00 22 2916 00 00 64 2915 00 01 50 2914 00 01 01 2913 00 01 55 2910 00 00 29 2980 00 01 33 2979 00 04 92 2978 00 02 50 2977 00 02 61 2953 00 00 10 2976 00 07 82 2997 00 04 37 2975 00 00 57 2974 00 00 43 2973 00 00 17 3001 00 07 07 3000 00 08 20 3007 00 15 53 3008 00 02 88 2321 00 02 13 6021 00 04 74 6207 00 03 775772 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 6283 00 06 83 6284 00 03 82
6281 00 00 49
6278 00 00 10
6282 00 00 55
6247 00 02 01
6248 00 02 52
6249 00 02 78
6253 00 02 04
6254 00 05 00
6255 00 02 37
6256 00 00 80
GHATAKURI 1218 00 01 26
1221 00 02 27
1222 00 06 26
1223 00 00 10
1234 00 04 36
1233 00 00 10
1249 00 00 27
1248 00 00 45
1247 00 02 05
1269 00 00 84
1268 00 00 95
1265/3844 00 02 00
1285 00 00 81
1286 00 02 24
1284 00 00 50
1290 00 01 31
1283 00 00 39
1291 00 01 06
1313 00 01 33
1282 00 01 08
1324 00 00 63
1317 00 01 11
1323 00 00 38
1318 00 01 45
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5773
1322 00 00 36
1321 00 01 56
1319 00 00 97 1320 00 01 03 1353 00 01 26 1371 00 01 74 1354 00 00 54 1355 00 00 10 1356 00 00 49 1369 00 00 45 1368 00 00 65 1358 00 02 45 1367 00 01 07 1366 00 01 03 1359 00 00 28 1365 00 01 88 1408 00 00 32 1364 00 02 66 1422 00 00 13 1409 00 02 83 1407 00 00 10 1410 00 05 74 1419 00 00 40 1418 00 00 28 1417 00 00 45 1416 00 01 32 1413 00 00 10 1414 00 02 27 1415 00 01 94 1465 00 00 31 1464 00 01 33 1463 00 00 12 1462 00 01 45 1461 00 01 40 1460 00 00 72 1459 00 00 235774 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1458 00 01 30 1644 00 03 62
1645 00 03 58 1641 00 03 09 1640 00 03 21 1634 00 02 45 2561 00 02 98 2569 00 03 59 2570 00 03 16 2587 00 00 15 2586 00 02 90 2588 00 00 34 2589 00 03 72 2651 00 01 50 2655 00 01 38 2654 00 00 50 2657 00 02 25 2659 00 00 64 2658 00 01 36 2663 00 00 24 2664 00 03 00 2668 00 01 25 2669 00 01 99 2669/4227 00 00 99 2692 00 01 71 2691 00 03 35 2692/3822 00 01 14 2690 00 02 91 2801 00 06 43 2802 00 00 38 2803 00 01 88 2799/3877 00 02 01 2798 00 01 90 2797 00 02 26 2790 00 00 11 2791 00 01 32[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5775
2786 00 01 742777 00 04 71
2773 00 00 66 2775 00 00 83 2774 00 01 46 2766 00 00 35 2765 00 01 37 2763 00 01 05 2762 00 01 07 2761 00 00 97 2760 00 00 96 2759 00 01 55 3373 00 01 95 3366 00 01 79 3365 00 01 73 3363 00 05 87 3363/3845 00 03 52 3356 00 01 28 3357 00 00 39 3353 00 01 65 3352 00 01 33 3351 00 01 54 3350 00 01 49 3349 00 01 54 3348 00 01 60 3343 00 01 46 3344 00 01 16 3341 00 01 37 3339 00 00 97 3338 00 01 25 3333 00 01 57 3334 00 00 25 3329 00 01 40 3327 00 00 86 3328 00 00 50 3322 00 00 915776 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3320 00 00 55 3319 00 00 85
3317 00 01 04
3316 00 00 14
3314 00 01 05
3310 00 02 27
KOTINADA 757 00 06 11
756 00 01 36
758 00 00 19
1296 00 03 47
1297 00 03 00
1298 00 02 83
1301 00 02 72
1302 00 02 78
1341 00 02 73
1345 00 02 87
1200 00 04 16
1201 00 04 18
1205 00 00 10
1204 00 00 10
1203 00 04 28
1202 00 00 13
1196 00 02 03
1195 00 01 55
1193 00 03 04
1185 00 02 15
1184 00 00 46
1183 00 01 26
1182 00 01 37
1181 00 03 24
1180 00 02 74
1175 00 01 20
1175/1499 00 01 95
1174 00 02 61
1173 00 04 05
1172 00 03 55
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5777
1171 00 03 37
1170 00 03 13 1162 00 00 95 1163 00 01 13 1164 00 00 10 1154 00 01 99 1153 00 01 71 1144 00 02 15 1143 00 02 04 1140 00 03 83 1071 00 03 15 1091 00 00 45 1092 00 00 36 1072 00 03 15 1090 00 01 60 1089 00 01 88 1093 00 00 20 1085 00 02 22 1094 00 01 98 1098 00 02 17 1097 00 01 03 1099 00 00 37 1096 00 00 10 1101 00 02 60 1102 00 02 85 1105 00 04 43 1106 00 01 92 1107 00 01 97 1109 00 04 02 1110 00 04 08 1421 00 00 10 1427 00 05 83 1426 00 01 96 1422 00 00 15 1425 00 02 20 1423 00 00 105778 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1424 00 04 04 1798 00 00 47 KUMBHARI
1823 00 00 54 1824 00 01 80 1795 00 01 38 1843 00 01 98 1844 00 02 35 1845 00 00 73 1846 00 00 44 1848 00 04 89 1847 00 00 67 1769 00 00 87 1768 00 05 35 1759 00 02 59 1758 00 02 37 1734 00 00 10 1735 00 03 18 1736 00 02 08 1737 00 01 72 1738 00 02 47 1711 00 05 75 1739 00 00 41 1693 00 05 55 1694 00 00 55 1696 00 01 66 1695 00 03 10 1654 00 03 89 1653 00 00 14 1515 00 00 20 1652 00 04 26 1651 00 03 69 1650 00 03 70 1551 00 00 10 1649 00 03 46 1578 00 00 10 1581 00 04 70[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5779 1582 00 00 38
1580 00 02 09 1583 00 02 94 1584 00 00 47 1631 00 04 55 1627 00 00 22 1630 00 01 16 1628 00 02 32 1629 00 03 40 1623 00 00 12 1622 00 01 81 2415 00 01 63 2416 00 02 31 2417 00 02 14 2427 00 09 63 2433 00 00 56 2439 00 01 37 2441 00 00 50 2440 00 02 32 2444 00 07 36 2445 00 00 10 3314 00 00 20 3315 00 02 67 3311 00 02 90 3313 00 02 69 3312 00 01 85 3308 00 03 44 3307 00 04 97 3328 00 03 45 3329 00 06 83 3331 00 05 08 3382 00 00 17 3380 00 01 81 3381 00 00 10 3379 00 01 93 3377 00 00 105780 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
3438 00 10 28 3375 00 01 74 3447 00 03 89 3448 00 04 10 3476 00 01 98 3460 00 00 52 3459 00 00 45 3458 00 01 32 3463 00 03 17 3464 00 00 10 3467 00 02 61 3469 00 02 71 3468 00 02 92 3475 00 08 25 3508 00 08 71 3509 00 05 52 3521 00 00 78 3522 00 01 02 3733 00 02 16 3877 00 09 92 3878 00 02 64 3874 00 00 47 3876 00 07 97 3875 00 03 88 3884 00 04 81 3858 00 05 23 3856 00 02 66 3846 00 01 29 3845 00 01 03 3828 00 03 84 3827 00 01 55 3826 00 03 80 3820 00 02 48 3819 00 01 41 3809 00 00 70 3810 00 02 22[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5781 3811 00 03 28
3812 00 02 91
3807 00 03 24
3804 00 01 29
3800 00 02 99
3801 00 02 85
3798 00 00 10
3782 00 03 07
3783 00 02 90
3790 00 09 66
3789 00 10 23
3857 00 02 66
VENKATARAIPALLI 38 00 01 68
40 00 01 75
41 00 01 56
51 00 01 81
50 00 02 68
49 00 02 23
48 00 00 94
58 00 04 26
45 00 00 24
59 00 02 46
60 00 02 66
70 00 01 05
71 00 01 15
69 00 00 78
72 00 01 39
83 00 01 66
82 00 01 79
110 00 01 88
109 00 01 37
111 00 00 68
108 00 01 34
113 00 01 47
107 00 00 82
106 00 01 96
5782 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
101 00 01 77102 00 01 40
103 00 00 25 99 00 00 10 98 00 03 58 96 00 02 14 130 00 01 77 129 00 03 88 155 00 03 00 156 00 00 10 152 00 00 10 160 00 02 21 159 00 00 19 161 00 01 61 165 00 00 91 162 00 00 13 163 00 03 47 164 00 00 78 145 00 03 72 144 00 03 57 146 00 00 10 143 00 06 90 322 00 01 74 343 00 19 52 358 00 00 10 338 00 02 48 343/2209 00 01 49 339 00 00 68 340 00 00 18 341 00 00 18 337 00 01 94 336 00 01 99 332 00 03 96 333 00 04 55 330 00 00 12 576 00 04 01[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5783
546 00 01 95575 00 00 15
575/2220 00 00 10
545 00 03 72
547 00 02 48
548 00 00 42
553 00 04 42
544 00 06 48
533 00 09 21
533/2232 00 04 06
543 00 01 51
532 00 01 66
531 00 02 75
512 00 01 48
530 00 01 33
523 00 00 70
524 00 02 70
525 00 00 71
526 00 03 78
500 00 06 03
497 00 00 14
498 00 01 31
499 00 04 01
494 00 00 67
MAGURA 1979 00 00 96
1981 00 04 66
1982 00 04 01
1978 00 01 82
1991 00 00 10
1990 00 09 51
1989 00 03 36
1993 00 05 65
1992 00 02 40
1948 00 04 54
1946 00 00 23
1947 00 01 73
5784 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
TARASINGI 721 00 01 31
848 00 01 40
849 00 07 29
847 00 00 67
846 00 00 53
845 00 00 63
844 00 00 78
843 00 01 03
842 00 00 77
841 00 00 42
751 00 02 39
850 00 00 14
836 00 06 25
840 00 00 10
835 00 07 96
834 00 02 82
806 00 00 78
805 00 00 12
807 00 01 35
808 00 00 56
810 00 00 51
809 00 00 19
811 00 00 98
812 00 00 20
813 00 00 19
814 00 01 26
815 00 00 94
816 00 00 23
832 00 02 23
817 00 00 32
818 00 01 77
831 00 01 54
828 00 01 20
827 00 01 83
819 00 02 04
820 00 00 25
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5785
821 00 00 52
822 00 02 55 823 00 01 33 824 00 00 85 825 00 00 10 1103 00 02 24 1104 00 01 99 1114 00 03 54 1113 00 04 15 1105 00 03 64 1112 00 04 42 1109 00 01 09 1107 00 00 10 1108 00 04 66 1631 00 00 25 1633 00 06 22 1634 00 04 69 1617 00 04 36 1562 00 00 41 1561 00 01 73 1563 00 02 12 1566 00 01 87 1567 00 00 10 1568 00 02 04 1569 00 04 09 1574 00 02 12 1575 00 01 68 1576 00 01 20 1577 00 01 21 1578 00 01 57 1579 00 01 76 1582 00 01 05 1583 00 05 73 1584 00 00 57 1528 00 01 60 1527 00 06 065786 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1526 00 10 04 1516 00 02 70
1694 00 00 18
1695 00 05 51
1699 00 02 05
1700 00 00 60
1698 00 01 23
1701 00 01 71
1705 00 00 75
1697 00 00 10
1702 00 00 90
1704 00 03 43
1703 00 00 22
1709 00 02 72
1710 00 02 57
1509 00 01 69
1510 00 00 20
1508 00 01 67
1507 00 03 49
1500 00 00 78
1501 00 00 10
1505 00 01 26
1504 00 02 29
1503 00 00 98
1506 00 02 74
1483 00 00 18
KENDUPADARA 190 00 04 40
189 00 04 03
188 00 03 60
187 00 03 42
186 00 03 23
185 00 00 54
184 00 02 91
167 00 00 42
167/2500 00 03 57
167/2501 00 03 57
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5787
154 00 04 65156 00 05 72
150 00 02 93 130 00 02 75 127 00 01 52 126 00 01 47 76 00 00 10 76/2499 00 01 61 77 00 01 71 78 00 00 53 85 00 00 10 79 00 00 10 80 00 01 35 81 00 01 66 82 00 00 62 451 00 05 94 447 00 00 15 446 00 00 96 445 00 02 57 444 00 02 06 443 00 02 68 442 00 00 10 479 00 05 25 481 00 04 92 480 00 00 84 484 00 05 39 429 00 00 29 430 00 02 25 431 00 00 10 428 00 04 98 432 00 01 40 426 00 01 35 229 00 03 25 295 00 00 41 296 00 02 49 297 00 02 395788 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 299 00 00 81
300 00 01 72 309 00 03 02 310 00 02 12 321 00 01 97 320 00 01 77 323 00 02 63 326 00 02 71 329 00 01 82 333 00 02 79 335 00 00 31 336 00 01 01 339 00 03 50 344 00 00 24 343 00 02 82 346 00 00 10 345 00 01 56 350 00 01 83 351 00 02 14 357 00 03 31 358 00 00 50 2106 00 00 50 2103 00 01 58 2102 00 01 99 2101 00 02 28 2104 00 00 10 2100 00 01 12 2099 00 09 17 2117 00 00 10 2118 00 00 47 2094 00 03 00 2095 00 00 44 2093 00 01 37 2121 00 13 74 2119 00 00 44 2120 00 02 87[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5789
2140 00 13 23
MENTAPADA 1295 00 09 90
1316 00 00 58
1804 00 07 18
1812 00 00 44
1811 00 03 95
1809 00 00 28
1810 00 00 51
1822 00 02 00
1823 00 00 53
1824 00 00 52
1826 00 00 84
1827 00 00 10
1830 00 00 89
1841 00 02 96
1854 00 00 10
1855 00 03 10
1857 00 00 41
1858 00 00 57
1856 00 01 08
1859 00 00 78
1861 00 00 23
1860 00 00 36
1867 00 00 10
1870 00 00 50
1869 00 00 65
1868 00 00 12
1865 00 00 41
1873 00 01 31
1874 00 02 96
1878 00 04 69
1891 00 00 89
1895 00 03 17
1927 00 09 11
1933 00 06 48
1932 00 01 50
1931 00 02 18
1929 00 02 85
3056 00 00 10
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
5790 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2024202420242024....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है ओर जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है,उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील- शेरगढ़ | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
गुिड़सर 1 00 04 17
135 00 00 14
136 00 00 51
137 00 01 79
138 00 04 00
139 00 03 00
162 00 00 10
129 00 01 37
140 00 00 87
161 00 00 12
160 00 00 63
153 00 02 49
159 00 00 20
152 00 00 77
151 00 02 31
155 00 00 91
154 00 01 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5791
150 00 02 90
148 00 00 36
149 00 01 51 308 00 00 95 307 00 01 77 309 00 00 50 306 00 01 71 305 00 00 75 311 00 04 28 304 00 00 13 319 00 00 65 318 00 02 08 316 00 00 10 317 00 00 62 324 00 04 09 328 00 01 79 321 00 00 11 322 00 01 21 323 00 02 83 327 00 01 13 329 00 00 35 330 00 01 26 331 00 00 57 337 00 00 10 336 00 00 96 335 00 01 71 334 00 02 08 362 00 00 52 363 00 01 46 365 00 00 10 370 00 01 07 364 00 01 95 368 00 00 57 369 00 00 92 371 00 01 22 367 00 00 385792 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
376 00 01 71377 00 01 45
375 00 00 16 378 00 00 40 383 00 01 86 382 00 03 60 381 00 00 51 387 00 00 10 388 00 01 41 389 00 01 82 390 00 01 90 391 00 00 56 412 00 00 10 411 00 00 25 403 00 03 61 404 00 02 10 1376 00 02 04 1374 00 01 22 1377 00 01 45 1373 00 01 14 1375 00 01 29 1383 00 02 12 1372 00 01 79 1371 00 01 39 1370 00 02 52 1384 00 00 85 1385 00 03 67 1386 00 03 31 1392 00 02 29 1393 00 01 73 1387 00 00 10 1388 00 00 35 1391 00 01 84 1394 00 01 17 1389 00 00 92 1390 00 01 98[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5793 1395 00 00 63 1396 00 00 35
1421 00 02 00
1420 00 06 98
1418 00 00 18
1423 00 01 10
1424 00 01 72
1425 00 01 88
1419 00 00 10
1429 00 04 51
1428 00 04 51
1427 00 02 86
1432 00 00 92
1795 00 02 75
1086 00 02 11
1085 00 07 47
1087 00 00 17
1084 00 06 52
1080 00 02 94
1083 00 02 37
1082 00 00 36
1070 00 00 19
1071 00 01 03
1072 00 01 46
1073 00 01 25
1074 00 01 27
ते(cid:20)तुिलआ 1260 10 96
1261 19 45
पािकिड़ 1 00 54 23
16 00 05 20
17 00 00 98
18 00 00 94
19 00 00 58
27 00 06 12
28 00 04 68
29 00 12 37
5794 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
31 00 04 14
32 00 01 21 33 00 00 16 33/1198 00 01 09 35 00 00 92 35/1077 00 00 59 35/1078 00 00 59 35/1140 00 00 91 35/1145 00 02 68 35/1155 00 03 32 35/1156 00 02 08 35/1157 00 02 56 35/1158 00 00 62 35/1159 00 00 59 35/1160 00 00 33 35/1161 00 00 32 35/1162 00 02 79 35/1163 00 02 79 35/1164 00 00 83 35/1183 00 01 07 35/1184 00 00 67 35/1185 00 00 40 35/1186 00 00 53 36 00 06 26 48 00 05 71 55 00 01 85 56 00 02 03 63 00 00 99 223 00 01 44 246 00 24 41 245 00 03 60 242 00 00 49 271 00 00 51 272 00 07 03 273 00 00 23 274 00 03 59[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5795
275 00 04 17276 00 00 10
276/1125 00 04 79
278 00 11 46
228 00 05 71
278/1118 00 00 10
279 00 03 46
281 00 00 19
आ(cid:27)बथागुड़ा 287 00 02 85
288 00 06 29
303 00 00 10
302 00 00 67
300 00 01 10
301 00 04 90
308 00 00 33
299 00 02 05
298 00 01 56
297 00 02 04
296 00 02 13
266 00 01 03
334 00 00 82
335 00 00 54
336 00 00 89
265 00 00 17
262 00 00 13
337 00 07 39
346 00 03 45
345 00 03 25
343 00 04 11
342 00 00 84
394 00 01 17
395 00 01 31
396 00 00 77
413 00 01 04
414 00 02 65
415 00 03 22
5796 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
416 00 00 11
444 00 03 75
447 00 03 75
446 00 00 10
443 00 00 07
449 00 01 89
448 00 03 99
465 00 05 11
466 00 00 06
471 00 00 10
473 00 00 10
472 00 04 95
475 00 01 37
469 00 09 99
499 00 01 11
500 00 00 26
502 00 02 42
638 00 02 92
639 00 00 73
637 00 01 39
640 00 04 20
636 00 02 49
642 00 05 29
654 00 00 13
655 00 01 21
672 00 08 59
656 00 02 53
668 00 02 37
667 00 04 84
728 00 04 72
729 00 03 97
666 00 00 28
665 00 00 63
730 00 01 57
िब(cid:30)रपुर 37 00 00 25
39 00 01 62
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5797
40 00 00 10
38 00 00 12
68 00 02 80
67 00 00 65
29 00 00 10
69 00 05 36
88 00 02 17
87 00 07 93
89 00 00 77
90 00 07 96
94 00 03 97
98 00 00 81
99 00 01 04
93 00 13 25
100 00 04 63
102 00 00 17
101 00 12 91
िकि(cid:31) पुर 1153 00 10 72
1089 00 30 67
1090 00 00 84
1086 00 00 61
1084 00 00 15
1083 00 00 33
1082 00 03 97
1080 00 05 60
1078 00 01 72
1077 00 06 83
1075 00 07 65
1075/1668 00 02 07
1074 00 00 03
1068 00 05 67
1226 00 04 66
1222 00 04 17
1231 00 04 97
1232 00 05 37
1236 00 02 18
5798 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1237 00 05 45
1242 00 00 10
1243 00 04 37
1247 00 00 86
1246 00 02 26
1244 00 04 80
1245 00 08 13
1240 00 01 44
1257 00 02 07
1256 00 03 04
1255 00 00 10
1278 00 06 35
1277 00 05 58
1270 00 01 88
1269 00 01 32
1509 00 11 60
1507 00 05 38
1524 00 05 31
1526 00 03 66
1572/1609 00 03 90
1572 00 04 60
1571 00 03 60
1570 00 04 81
1569 00 08 64
1583 00 06 82
1582 00 00 10
1592 00 00 66
1591 00 05 70
1593 00 03 28
1593/1694 00 01 83
1590 00 03 54
1601 00 05 72
1589 00 03 47
1602 00 08 98
1603 00 00 94
नरे(cid:20)"पुर 5238 00 02 14
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5799
5239 00 01 09
5239/5691 00 01 09
5234 00 00 68 5233 00 00 90 5232 00 00 49 5226 00 01 05 5227 00 04 14 5228 00 02 91 5202 00 09 85 5203 00 02 76 5195 00 03 16 5192 00 04 80 5194 00 00 13 5193 00 05 91 5189 00 06 13 5187 00 01 80 5153 00 11 82 5154 00 06 36 5155 00 00 10 5156 00 02 92 5148 00 00 10 5157 00 00 38 5158 00 05 94 5160 00 00 22 5159 00 04 62 5161 00 00 25 5145 00 01 27 5144 00 04 73 5143 00 00 51 5130 00 03 58 5132 00 04 96 5133 00 00 52 5134 00 02 97 5135 00 01 27 5140 00 00 93 5139 00 03 565800 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5138 00 00 57 5124 00 04 41
5123 00 01 18
5121 00 00 70
5122 00 04 41
5369 00 04 57
5375 00 02 85
5374 00 00 45
5373 00 00 23
5377 00 01 00
5378 00 00 41
5379 00 05 22
5380 00 00 27
5381 00 05 11
5382 00 04 48
5386 00 02 36
5390 00 05 30
5392 00 00 10
5393 00 05 74
5394 00 01 46
5395 00 04 71
5400 00 08 03
5401 00 11 35
5405 00 02 62
5404 00 07 48
5421 00 06 03
5422 00 04 85
5420 00 00 13
5432 00 08 08
5431 00 00 21
5430 00 00 10
घड़काराजे(cid:20)"पुर 10 00 00 21
11 00 02 63
61 00 05 37
62 00 00 34
63 00 04 37
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5801
67 00 02 50
66 00 05 88
64 00 00 10
65 00 06 24
88 00 11 49
97 00 02 32
100 00 01 04
98 00 02 27
99 00 04 74
108 00 00 12
110 00 04 35
109 00 03 92
124 00 10 10
122 00 00 10
120 00 04 95
133 00 07 25
119 00 07 38
134 00 02 02
मा&िड़ जगनाथपुर 1400 00 02 61
1403 00 12 33
1406 00 00 99
1407 00 00 85
1408 00 00 61
1410 00 09 16
1412 00 04 94
1413 00 04 86
पुना(cid:20)द 46 00 02 44
47 00 10 44
72 00 24 69
70 00 00 67
68 00 00 10
67 00 02 62
66 00 02 12
137 00 00 10
138 00 00 48
139 00 01 75
5802 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
140 00 03 78
141 00 02 05
141/3969 00 02 05 142 00 03 13 143 00 02 03 143/3839 00 02 03 144 00 00 93 144/3825 00 00 93 144/3826 00 04 16 145 00 02 17 146 00 01 97 147 00 01 06 149 00 06 12 174 00 02 49 191 00 00 13 195 00 01 04 196 00 00 90 192 00 00 38 197 00 04 63 194 00 10 26 193 00 03 33 221 00 02 07 222 00 02 91 257 00 00 06 253 00 00 10 223 00 09 30 224 00 00 33 242 00 00 25 243 00 03 60 241 00 01 63 245 00 01 07 246 00 01 06 247 00 00 87 248 00 02 06 240 00 01 51 565 00 03 08[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5803 570 00 04 74
566 00 01 49 568 00 00 93 569 00 03 02 643 00 06 21 644 00 00 10 642 00 07 27 641 00 00 18 640 00 00 10 651 00 03 08 653 00 00 43 652 00 06 48 656 00 03 92 650 00 00 74 658 00 04 41 659 00 00 34 691 00 02 19 692 00 02 47 689 00 00 10 693 00 03 27 694 00 01 59 688 00 01 25 683 00 00 45 750 00 03 75 682 00 02 66 751 00 04 77 752 00 01 03 787 00 07 39 787/3833 00 00 10 776 00 05 91 777 00 00 49 786 00 01 60 785 00 04 39 784 00 07 59 783 00 02 77 813 00 00 565804 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 813/3850 00 03 09
810 00 02 43 812 00 04 99 861 00 03 30 860 00 03 33 859 00 00 16 865 00 00 18 866 00 02 45 858 00 01 46 872 00 01 25 857 00 00 33 873 00 02 32 883 00 00 58 882 00 03 07 881 00 04 44 875 00 01 94 879 00 04 99 932 00 00 84 933 00 02 18 936 00 01 79 937 00 02 42 940 00 05 20 1324 00 04 47 1325 00 04 10 1326 00 00 47 1321 00 01 14 1327 00 05 49 1328 00 01 06 1319 00 00 45 1318 00 03 98 1329 00 03 50 1358 00 00 26 1316 00 00 17 1330 00 03 27 1331 00 00 19 1331/3794 00 03 03[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5805
1357 00 01 09 1356 00 01 50 1355 00 00 66 1354 00 00 24 1333 00 00 41 1336 00 01 83 1337 00 00 53 1338 00 01 36 1335 00 01 18 1339 00 01 82 1249 00 00 10 1340 00 02 63 1341/3795 00 02 15 1341 00 01 24 1343 00 00 10 1342/3796 00 01 42 1342 00 01 89 3485 00 00 84 3486 00 01 28 3488 00 00 38 3489 00 01 72 3490 00 00 85 3491 00 00 10
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट-I)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2024.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana), "Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
5806 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : SHERAGADA | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
GUDISARA 1 00 04 17
135 00 00 14
136 00 00 51
137 00 01 79
138 00 04 00
139 00 03 00
162 00 00 10
129 00 01 37
140 00 00 87
161 00 00 12
160 00 00 63
153 00 02 49
159 00 00 20
152 00 00 77
151 00 02 31
155 00 00 91
154 00 01 87
150 00 02 90
148 00 00 36
149 00 01 51
308 00 00 95
307 00 01 77
309 00 00 50
306 00 01 71
305 00 00 75
311 00 04 28
304 00 00 13
319 00 00 65
318 00 02 08
316 00 00 10
317 00 00 62
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5807
324 00 04 09
328 00 01 79 321 00 00 11 322 00 01 21 323 00 02 83 327 00 01 13 329 00 00 35 330 00 01 26 331 00 00 57 337 00 00 10 336 00 00 96 335 00 01 71 334 00 02 08 362 00 00 52 363 00 01 46 365 00 00 10 370 00 01 07 364 00 01 95 368 00 00 57 369 00 00 92 371 00 01 22 367 00 00 38 376 00 01 71 377 00 01 45 375 00 00 16 378 00 00 40 383 00 01 86 382 00 03 60 381 00 00 51 387 00 00 10 388 00 01 41 389 00 01 82 390 00 01 90 391 00 00 56 412 00 00 10 411 00 00 255808 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
403 00 03 61 404 00 02 10 1376 00 02 04 1374 00 01 22 1377 00 01 45 1373 00 01 14 1375 00 01 29 1383 00 02 12 1372 00 01 79 1371 00 01 39 1370 00 02 52 1384 00 00 85 1385 00 03 67 1386 00 03 31 1392 00 02 29 1393 00 01 73 1387 00 00 10 1388 00 00 35 1391 00 01 84 1394 00 01 17 1389 00 00 92 1390 00 01 98 1395 00 00 63 1396 00 00 35 1421 00 02 00 1420 00 06 98 1418 00 00 18 1423 00 01 10 1424 00 01 72 1425 00 01 88 1419 00 00 10 1429 00 04 51 1428 00 04 51 1427 00 02 86 1432 00 00 92 1795 00 02 75[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5809
1086 00 02 11
1085 00 07 47
1087 00 00 17
1084 00 06 52
1080 00 02 94
1083 00 02 37
1082 00 00 36
1070 00 00 19
1071 00 01 03
1072 00 01 46
1073 00 01 25
1074 00 01 27
1260
10 96 TENTULIA
1261
19 45
1 00 54 23 PAKIDI
16 00 05 20
17 00 00 98
18 00 00 94
19 00 00 58
27 00 06 12
28 00 04 68
29 00 12 37
31 00 04 14
32 00 01 21
33 00 00 16
33/1198 00 01 09
35 00 00 92
35/1077 00 00 59
35/1078 00 00 59
35/1140 00 00 91
35/1145 00 02 68
35/1155 00 03 32
35/1156 00 02 08
35/1157 00 02 56
35/1158 00 00 62
35/1159 00 00 595810 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 35/1160 00 00 33 35/1161 00 00 32
35/1162 00 02 79
35/1163 00 02 79
35/1164 00 00 83
35/1183 00 01 07
35/1184 00 00 67
35/1185 00 00 40
35/1186 00 00 53
36 00 06 26
48 00 05 71
55 00 01 85
56 00 02 03
63 00 00 99
223 00 01 44
246 00 204 41
245 00 03 60
242 00 00 49
271 00 00 51
272 00 07 03
273 00 00 23
274 00 03 59
275 00 04 17
276 00 00 10
276/1125 00 04 79
278 00 11 46
228 00 05 71
278/1118 00 00 10
279 00 03 46
281 00 00 19
AMBATHAGUDA 287 00 02 85
288 00 06 29
303 00 00 10
302 00 00 67
300 00 01 10
301 00 04 90
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5811
308 00 00 33299 00 02 05
298 00 01 56 297 00 02 04 296 00 02 13 266 00 01 03 334 00 00 82 335 00 00 54 336 00 00 89 265 00 00 17 262 00 00 13 337 00 07 39 346 00 03 45 345 00 03 25 343 00 04 11 342 00 00 84 394 00 01 17 395 00 01 31 396 00 00 77 413 00 01 04 414 00 02 65 415 00 03 22 416 00 00 11 444 00 03 75 447 00 03 75 446 00 00 10 443 00 00 07 449 00 01 89 448 00 03 99 465 00 05 11 466 00 00 06 471 00 00 10 473 00 00 10 472 00 04 95 475 00 01 37 469 00 09 995812 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
499 00 01 11500 00 00 26
502 00 02 42
638 00 02 92
639 00 00 73
637 00 01 39
640 00 04 20
636 00 02 49
642 00 05 29
654 00 00 13
655 00 01 21
672 00 08 59
656 00 02 53
668 00 02 37
667 00 04 84
728 00 04 72
729 00 03 97
666 00 00 28
665 00 00 63
730 00 01 57
BIRIPUR 37 00 00 25
39 00 01 62
40 00 00 10
38 00 00 12
68 00 02 80
67 00 00 65
29 00 00 10
69 00 05 36
88 00 02 17
87 00 07 93
89 00 00 77
90 00 07 96
94 00 03 97
98 00 00 81
99 00 01 04
93 00 13 25
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5813
100 00 04 63102 00 00 17
101 00 12 91
KIRTIPUR 1153 00 10 72
1089 00 30 67
1090 00 00 84
1086 00 00 61
1084 00 00 15
1083 00 00 33
1082 00 03 97
1080 00 05 60
1078 00 01 72
1077 00 06 83
1075 00 07 65
1075/1668 00 02 07
1074 00 00 03
1068 00 05 67
1226 00 04 66
1222 00 04 17
1231 00 04 97
1232 00 05 37
1236 00 02 18
1237 00 05 45
1242 00 00 08
1243 00 04 37
1247 00 00 86
1246 00 02 26
1244 00 04 80
1245 00 08 13
1240 00 01 44
1257 00 02 07
1256 00 03 04
1255 00 00 10
1278 00 06 35
1277 00 05 58
1270 00 01 88
5814 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1269 00 01 32
1509 00 11 60
1507 00 05 38
1524 00 05 31
1526 00 03 66
1572/1609 00 03 90
1572 00 04 60
1571 00 03 60
1570 00 04 81
1569 00 08 64
1583 00 06 82
1582 00 00 10
1592 00 00 66
1591 00 05 70
1593 00 03 28
1593/1694 00 01 83
1590 00 03 54
1601 00 05 72
1589 00 03 47
1602 00 08 98
1603 00 00 94
NARENDRAPUR 5238 00 02 14
5239 00 01 09
5239/5691 00 01 09
5234 00 00 68
5233 00 00 90
5232 00 00 49
5226 00 01 05
5227 00 04 14
5228 00 02 91
5202 00 09 85
5203 00 02 76
5195 00 03 16
5192 00 04 80
5194 00 00 13
5193 00 05 91
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5815
5189 00 06 13
5187 00 01 80
5153 00 11 82 5154 00 06 36 5155 00 00 10 5156 00 02 92 5148 00 00 10 5157 00 00 38 5158 00 05 94 5160 00 00 22 5159 00 04 62 5161 00 00 25 5145 00 01 27 5144 00 04 73 5143 00 00 51 5130 00 03 58 5132 00 04 96 5133 00 00 52 5134 00 02 97 5135 00 01 27 5140 00 00 93 5139 00 03 56 5138 00 00 57 5124 00 04 41 5123 00 01 18 5121 00 00 70 5122 00 04 41 5369 00 04 57 5375 00 02 85 5374 00 00 45 5373 00 00 23 5377 00 01 00 5378 00 00 41 5379 00 05 22 5380 00 00 27 5381 00 05 115816 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5382 00 04 48 5386 00 02 36
5390 00 05 30
5392 00 00 10
5393 00 05 74
5394 00 01 46
5395 00 04 71
5400 00 08 03
5401 00 11 35
5405 00 02 62
5404 00 07 48
5421 00 06 03
5422 00 04 85
5420 00 00 13
5432 00 08 08
5431 00 00 21
5430 00 00 10
GHADAKARAJENDRAPUR 10 00 00 21
11 00 02 63
61 00 05 37
62 00 00 34
63 00 04 37
67 00 02 50
66 00 05 88
64 00 00 10
65 00 06 24
88 00 11 49
97 00 02 32
100 00 01 04
98 00 02 27
99 00 04 74
108 00 00 12
110 00 04 35
109 00 03 92
124 00 10 10
122 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5817
120 00 04 95
133 00 07 25
119 00 07 38
134 00 02 02
MARUDI JAGANATHAPUR 1400 00 02 61
1403 00 12 33
1406 00 00 99
1407 00 00 85
1408 00 00 61
1410 00 09 16
1412 00 04 94
1413 00 04 86
PUNANDA 46 00 02 44
47 00 10 44
72 00 24 69
70 00 00 67
68 00 00 002
67 00 02 62
66 00 02 12
137 00 00 10
138 00 00 48
139 00 01 75
140 00 03 78
141 00 02 05
141/3969 00 02 05
142 00 03 13
143 00 02 03
143/3839 00 02 03
144 00 00 93
144/3825 00 00 93
144/3826 00 04 16
145 00 02 17
146 00 01 97
147 00 01 06
149 00 06 12
174 00 02 49
5818 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
191 00 00 13
195 00 01 04
196 00 00 90 192 00 00 38 197 00 04 63 194 00 10 26 193 00 03 33 221 00 02 07 222 00 02 91 257 00 00 06 253 00 00 10 223 00 09 30 224 00 00 33 242 00 00 25 243 00 03 60 241 00 01 63 245 00 01 07 246 00 01 06 247 00 00 87 248 00 02 06 240 00 01 51 565 00 03 08 570 00 04 74 566 00 01 49 568 00 00 93 569 00 03 02 643 00 06 21 644 00 00 10 642 00 07 27 641 00 00 18 640 00 00 10 651 00 03 08 653 00 00 43 652 00 06 48 656 00 03 92 650 00 00 74[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5819
658 00 04 41659 00 00 34
691 00 02 19 692 00 02 47 689 00 00 10 693 00 03 27 694 00 01 59 688 00 01 25 683 00 00 45 750 00 03 75 682 00 02 66 751 00 04 77 752 00 01 03 787 00 07 39 787/3833 00 00 10 776 00 05 91 777 00 00 49 786 00 01 60 785 00 04 39 784 00 07 59 783 00 02 77 813 00 00 56 813/3850 00 03 09 810 00 02 43 812 00 04 99 861 00 03 30 860 00 03 33 859 00 00 16 865 00 00 18 866 00 02 45 858 00 01 46 872 00 01 25 857 00 00 33 873 00 02 32 883 00 00 58 872 00 01 255820 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
871 00 04 44 875 00 01 94 879 00 04 99 932 00 00 84 933 00 02 18 936 00 01 79 937 00 02 42 940 00 05 20 1324 00 04 47 1325 00 04 10 1326 00 00 47 1321 00 01 14 1327 00 05 49 1328 00 01 06 1319 00 00 45 1318 00 03 98 1329 00 03 50 1358 00 00 26 1316 00 00 17 1330 00 03 27 1331 00 00 19 1331/3794 00 03 03 1357 00 01 09 1356 00 01 50 1355 00 00 66 1354 00 00 24 1333 00 00 41 1336 00 01 83 1337 00 00 53 1338 00 01 36 1335 00 01 18 1339 00 01 82 1249 00 00 10 1340 00 02 63 1341/3795 00 02 15 1341 00 01 24[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5821 1343 00 00 10 1342/3796 00 01 42
1342 00 01 89 3485 00 00 84 3486 00 01 28 3488 00 00 38 3489 00 01 72 3490 00 00 85 3491 00 00 10
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.-I)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2025202520252025....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब8 अनुसूची में व;र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है,उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Cए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Fक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व;र्णत भूमि में हितब8 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इJीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Lी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप-रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील- कु कु ड़ाखWिड | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
बलरामपल्लि 8 00 00 29
11 00 00 10
37 00 01 97
38 00 02 76
5822 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
39 00 00 83
42 00 01 44
36 00 03 88
40 00 00 87
41 00 00 85
43 00 00 56
45 00 00 51
48 00 00 77
44 00 04 07
50 00 00 39
51 00 00 56
35 00 03 24
27 00 00 10
34 00 02 00
31 00 01 38
52 00 00 58
33 00 01 26
32 00 00 89
53 00 03 12
56 00 03 45
60 00 01 95
57 00 02 00
58 00 03 67
91 00 02 59
90 00 01 21
92 00 01 62
95 00 01 13
100 00 02 09
101 00 01 17
106 00 01 12
सातपाWिडआ 2249 00 00 79
2261 00 00 62
2261/3125 00 00 60
2260 00 00 84
2260/3124 00 00 74
2259 00 00 89
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5823
2258 00 00 85
2263/3122 00 00 28 2263/3121 00 01 26 2263 00 00 28 2263/3123 00 00 28 2263/3120 00 00 51 2264 00 00 70 2265 00 00 45 2265/3363 00 00 27 2266 00 00 53 2267 00 02 28 2268 00 01 40 2269 00 01 11 2272 00 02 28 2279 00 04 19 2280 00 02 53 2281 00 01 89 2289 00 04 65 2285 00 06 95 2288 00 01 61 2127/3138 00 01 04 2127 00 01 16 2132/3132 00 00 19 2131 00 02 36 2132 00 00 10 2127/3135 00 00 67 2130/3354 00 01 52 2130 00 00 90 2129 00 01 01 2127/3136 00 00 41 2127/3137 00 00 44 2128 00 01 16 2125 00 00 61 2125/3142 00 01 24 2125/3127 00 02 50 2124 00 03 195824 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2123 00 01 13 2122 00 01 17 2121 00 01 43 2121/3847 00 01 32 2084 00 03 61 2084/3844 00 03 60 2291 00 03 57 2082 00 00 86 2083 00 01 56 2080 00 01 74 2081 00 00 92 2060 00 02 20 2373 00 08 87 2374/3190 00 01 63 2374/3193 00 00 10 2374 00 02 40 2375/3359 00 00 18 2375 00 01 84 2374/3189 00 01 29 2374/3192 00 01 33 2059 00 03 50 2374/3191 00 02 08 2375/3360 00 00 88 2048 00 04 77 2049 00 01 15 2047 00 08 76 2041 00 00 39 2040 00 09 56 2039 00 06 23 2033 00 01 22 2034 00 10 20 2035 00 00 10 2036 00 00 10 2032 00 02 95 2028 00 12 78 2027 00 00 74[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5825
2027/3740 00 00 74 2026 00 09 10 2512 00 19 00 2015 00 01 26 2556 00 01 12 2665/3361 00 02 28 2670 00 02 92 2669 00 04 50 2669/3252 00 00 48 2676 00 07 14 2678 00 00 10 2677 00 05 07 2716 00 04 28 2715 00 00 53 2711 00 01 75 2721 00 01 17 2720 00 01 09 2722 00 02 27 2723 00 00 12 2709 00 07 20 2724 00 07 33 2725 00 03 21 2729 00 04 69 2728 00 00 46 2735 00 05 00 2734/3250 00 02 69 2796 00 04 17 2803 00 03 73 2804 00 01 71 2805 00 01 51 2795 00 21 04 2795/3141 00 00 64 2813 00 09 86 2818 00 03 17 2821 00 13 79 2819 00 00 105826 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2823 00 03 25
2822 00 13 07
2825 00 07 28
2826 00 01 52
भुड़^का 68 00 13 41
69 00 24 76
70 00 28 70
71 00 08 30
72 00 09 01
73 00 06 07
73/4173 00 04 33
74 00 17 91
75 00 04 55
76 00 00 81
3226 00 00 10
3227 00 04 55
3228 00 03 21
3228/4167 00 03 74
3229 00 07 32
3245 00 00 10
3277 00 07 77
3278 00 13 74
3287 00 00 14
3287/4168 00 00 10
3280 00 07 82
3282 00 00 10
3286 00 02 39
3285/4113 00 00 84
3285/4114 00 01 60
3285 00 02 36
3298 00 00 15
3297 00 00 40
3297/4181 00 01 57
3296 00 05 87
3304 00 00 30
3305 00 02 79
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5827
3306 00 07 74
3311 00 00 10
3310 00 00 95 3309 00 02 56 3318 00 00 44 3335 00 02 92 3334 00 04 61 3336 00 01 31 3321 00 00 49 3333 00 02 57 3339 00 00 19 3332 00 00 65 3331 00 00 18 3322 00 09 15 3112 00 07 32 3323 00 00 43 3098 00 06 82 3325 00 00 23 3097 00 04 61 3096 00 04 11 3095 00 02 25 3360 00 04 87 3094 00 00 34 3361 00 02 41 3362 00 04 74 3363 00 05 41 3369 00 09 49 3368 00 01 46 3370 00 00 23 3367 00 10 54 3467 00 07 41 3466 00 01 66 3469 00 05 95 3499 00 07 60 3497 00 03 22 3500 00 01 545828 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3501 00 07 27 3502 00 01 01
3509 00 07 46
3511 00 01 09
3508 00 00 10
3509/4126 00 05 74
3527 00 12 76
3529 00 00 98
3526 00 06 00
3549 00 07 03
3548 00 08 89
3550 00 00 15
3547 00 00 43
3544 00 00 80
3558 00 17 77
3559 00 03 78
3560 00 01 30
3579 00 01 16
3579/4239 00 01 20
3596 00 00 61
3597 00 01 44
3595 00 01 22
3594 00 03 27
3593 00 03 70
3592 00 10 18
3591 00 04 83
3589 00 00 44
3586 00 17 29
3613 00 01 52
3614 00 07 90
बउलझोिल 842 00 00 34
843 00 00 10
846 00 00 10
915 00 04 95
917 00 01 52
918 00 01 00
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5829
926 00 02 21
922 00 00 45
925 00 01 46 927 00 01 64 928 00 02 05 929 00 02 21 969 00 02 38 970 00 03 89 971 00 02 02 972 00 02 68 973 00 03 03 974 00 00 10 973/2288 00 02 12 976 00 02 84 977/3152 00 03 41 977 00 00 27 978 00 03 01 978/3194 00 04 86 978/3195 00 04 03 980 00 00 78 1715 00 00 84 982 00 03 00 983 00 03 10 984 00 00 16 985 00 02 53 986 00 02 63 987 00 07 13 990 00 02 64 989 00 00 80 992 00 02 24 993 00 08 29 1000 00 00 11 999 00 06 83 1000/2275 00 00 56 1002 00 02 59 1001 00 02 505830 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1004 00 03 80 1006 00 05 45
1005 00 00 60
1004/3151 00 00 10
1314 00 06 99
1312/2270 00 00 10
1313 00 06 38
1317 00 00 49
1316 00 06 14
2087 00 07 17
2088 00 08 26
2089 00 04 97
बाइगणबािड़ 686 00 00 10
688 00 07 76
689 00 02 04
690 00 12 18
691 00 06 50
मCघराहिल 97 00 00 10
113 00 00 21
110 00 00 82
111 00 08 17
112 00 04 71
120 00 12 67
121 00 00 57
122 00 01 42
218 00 05 12
217 00 03 26
215 00 01 89
223 00 03 70
209 00 20 64
192 00 15 14
193 00 08 61
राइझोल 1030 00 10 17
1031 00 06 34
1039 00 02 89
1037 00 21 74
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5831
1038 00 06 22
1131 00 04 12
1132 00 01 30 1131/2503 00 00 10 1133 00 09 70 1119 00 00 18 1119/2939 00 00 26 1140 00 04 31 1141 00 02 06 1142 00 01 10 1143 00 05 49 1114 00 18 86 915 00 03 15 914 00 07 62 914/2525 00 04 40 886 00 00 10 907 00 02 77 887 00 07 01 888 00 06 86 889 00 01 95 892 00 07 75 893 00 04 63 870 00 05 45 1191 00 00 10 895 00 00 83 869 00 03 54 1193 00 00 93 868 00 02 76 1194 00 00 10 866 00 01 13 1196 00 00 10 1197 00 02 78 865 00 05 30 864 00 05 55 863 00 00 92 861 00 00 205832 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
862 00 04 41 2068 00 11 64 2069 00 00 17 2069/2652 00 00 21 2070 00 02 56 2067 00 05 16 2066 00 03 88 2065 00 01 13 2062 00 04 12 2061 00 03 77 2059 00 03 23 2060 00 02 60 2056 00 07 15 2049 00 11 53 2036 00 00 13 2038 00 01 10 2039 00 07 93 2041 00 00 10 2040 00 01 92 2010 00 03 15 2005 00 00 91 1870 00 00 10 1871 00 02 90 2003 00 05 25 1872 00 00 17 1875 00 03 90 1885 00 06 29 1886 00 01 05 1886/2694 00 02 05 1888 00 06 28 1887 00 00 24 1894 00 00 68 1893 00 03 06 1892 00 02 94 1891 00 03 90 1919 00 02 62[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5833 1920 00 00 10 1918 00 03 79
1917 00 02 03
1913 00 02 06
1916 00 07 12
1925 00 03 58
1926 00 00 25
1945 00 03 93
1927 00 01 51
1927/2524 00 02 61
1930 00 05 22
1943 00 00 39
1939 00 06 88
1941 00 00 14
1941/2768 00 00 20
1940 00 01 68
1938 00 00 22
1936 00 03 58
2445 00 00 33
2445/2662 00 00 48
1935 00 00 47
2446 00 03 62
2447 00 02 51
पादिरिपल्ली 303 00 04 10
325 00 02 18
324 00 03 96
323 00 04 83
309 00 00 64
322 00 06 74
315 00 00 18
321 00 04 30
316 00 00 68
317 00 01 04
319 00 01 20
318 00 04 16
362 00 01 08
5834 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
383 00 02 08
384 00 00 10
382 00 06 01
380 00 02 64
381 00 00 13
376 00 08 15
386/653 00 01 54
395 00 02 67
390 00 03 43
391 00 02 52
393 00 03 16
392 00 02 52
394 00 01 43
437 00 05 27
438 00 02 46
439 00 08 99
434 00 09 82
लांिजआ 743 00 01 79
742 00 00 11
744 00 08 44
752 00 01 98
745 00 02 08
750 00 00 95
749 00 03 76
751 00 04 80
757 00 03 11
748 00 00 32
758 00 06 24
769 00 00 80
806 00 01 97
805 00 02 46
804 00 01 02
803 00 00 10
770 00 00 10
802 00 03 88
801 00 03 19
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5835
828 00 01 56 828/1730 00 01 49 800 00 03 74 799 00 00 23 829 00 01 31 830 00 02 32 831 00 02 46 866 00 04 41 834 00 00 12 865 00 03 60 867 00 02 04 868 00 03 36 864 00 00 47 921 00 00 40 869 00 00 19 883 00 05 58 871 00 03 03 882 00 00 26 877 00 05 16 879 00 05 24 878 00 04 74 1029 00 01 75 1030 00 02 25 1028 00 00 10 1022 00 02 87 1023 00 00 10 1031 00 00 32 1020 00 00 66 1021 00 00 79 1034 00 01 03 1041 00 02 12 1040 00 02 29 1039 00 01 15 1038 00 04 19 1044 00 00 21 1137 00 03 685836 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1138 00 00 10 1134 00 03 09
1136 00 01 10 1135 00 01 48 1133 00 01 27 1132 00 05 42 1126 00 01 87 1131 00 01 28 1130 00 02 40 1129 00 01 86 1127 00 06 79 1128 00 01 69 1207 00 01 63 1209 00 02 44 1206 00 03 10 1211 00 02 64 1212 00 01 39 1213 00 01 60 1214 00 04 07 1215 00 06 80 1216 00 04 60 1224 00 01 78 1225 00 03 42 1223 00 01 82 1369 00 06 80 1369/1436 00 02 09 1370 00 04 27 1366 00 01 14 1365 00 01 62 1364 00 00 51 1352 00 04 14 1351 00 02 59 1349 00 02 68 1338 00 03 41 1337 00 02 84 1350 00 02 07[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5837 1344 00 10 60
1270 00 02 11
1322 00 02 59
1323 00 04 31
1324 00 02 22
1325 00 01 79
1326 00 03 22
1327 00 01 15
1328 00 00 55
1318 00 01 31
1313 00 01 20
1314 00 01 15
1308 00 00 95
1310 00 00 10
1306 00 01 07
1309 00 00 17
1298 00 00 49
1305 00 01 02
1304 00 01 71
1299 00 00 73
1300 00 00 77
1301 00 00 54
1302 00 02 73
1296 00 01 25
1295 00 01 46
1294 00 01 34
1293 00 01 41
भगबानपुर 563 00 04 94
564/922 00 00 10
538 00 04 05
539 00 09 28
540 00 01 04
537 00 00 25
516 00 11 34
519 00 11 03
535/808 00 06 15
5838 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
572 00 02 53
573 00 05 60
533 00 01 80 574/860 00 03 24 574/859 00 02 82 574/1179 00 01 54 574 00 01 29 576 00 08 40 576/1212 00 04 33 576/895 00 01 17 577 00 19 81 578 00 02 40 578/1184 00 06 60 579 00 02 22 579/1185 00 00 94 580 00 06 20 506/1031 00 00 17 581 00 01 46 582 00 05 88 582/1089 00 01 41 583 00 11 63 586 00 16 32 588 00 03 97 587 00 05 36 616 00 10 81 615 00 10 31 618 00 11 39 622 00 01 35 621 00 07 06 620 00 08 66 649 00 08 91 668 00 02 26 669 00 00 56 667 00 16 08 660 00 03 24 662 00 00 53[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5839 663 00 01 06 661 00 03 15
372 00 02 40 371 00 05 96 370 00 01 28 369 00 07 13 367 00 00 67 297 00 02 21 298 00 06 16 299/791 00 00 60 293 00 02 37 292 00 00 90 294 00 03 87 211 00 00 28 210/861 00 04 08 208 00 01 24 209 00 07 76 205 00 00 94 206 00 07 54 207 00 05 58 202 00 05 82 201 00 04 66 201/970 00 00 10 200 00 02 60 692 00 02 61 198 00 01 16 197 00 02 00 196 00 07 35 187 00 00 70 728 00 00 28 728/790 00 05 84 727 00 01 24 729 00 12 72 190 00 00 10 730 00 02 20 748 00 08 055840 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 750 00 04 50 747 00 07 65
747/803 00 01 65
747/804 00 00 78
751/890 00 05 41
756/864 00 02 77
755 00 06 71
756 00 05 43
754/778 00 00 44
756/888 00 05 87
756/887 00 02 70
759/772 00 05 80
760 00 14 00
759 00 05 09
886 00 07 16
761 00 01 95
762/845 00 06 85
762/846 00 04 36
763 00 00 72
अनन्ताइ 1365 00 03 14
1366 00 04 64
1367 00 02 00
1367/2328 00 05 15
1367/2330 00 05 15
1362 00 37 40
1330 00 03 69
1476 00 04 03
1474 00 02 94
1475 00 01 61
1396 00 00 76
1397 00 00 75
2118 00 01 22
1433 00 08 65
1438 00 03 62
1438/2193 00 02 50
1437 00 01 36
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5841
1436 00 18 52
1435/2175 00 00 51 1435 00 00 51 1446 00 00 43 1449 00 08 06 1450 00 08 96 1458 00 07 25 1456 00 00 37 1457 00 00 50 1455 00 02 75 1453 00 00 58 1454 00 02 90 1466 00 04 61 1591 00 00 17 1590 00 09 45 1599 00 00 10 1589/1797 00 02 26 1589 00 00 10 1606 00 06 08 1584 00 12 45 1583 00 00 10 1582 00 03 63 1610 00 01 42 1579 00 03 46 1580 00 00 55 1580/1796 00 02 13 1578 00 02 22 1613 00 00 56 1577 00 04 56 1576 00 01 69 1575 00 00 77 1544 00 00 10 1545 00 06 54 1574 00 00 78 1572 00 00 20 1546 00 04 115842 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1547 00 00 10
1548 00 02 17
1571 00 03 90
1571/2187 00 01 55
1560 00 04 02
1560/2157 00 02 64
1552 00 01 26
1553 00 06 67
1554 00 04 45
1557 00 00 36
1555 00 02 56
1556 00 00 58
782 00 06 95
780 00 00 82
781 00 05 32
764 00 02 53
736 00 00 70
739 00 06 89
740 00 04 08
741 00 01 30
742 00 07 34
743 00 09 01
744 00 04 08
745 00 02 30
753 00 07 46
754 00 07 84
761 00 04 50
762 00 00 53
बन्थपल्लि 1157 00 05 10
1156 00 07 29
1155 00 00 99
1154 00 00 63
1159 00 04 38
1153 00 01 50
1153/2538 00 01 18
1153/2798 00 03 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5843
1161 00 02 23
1161/3007 00 06 68 1167 00 03 42 1166 00 06 20 1164 00 01 00 1165 00 05 17 1145 00 02 97 1146 00 02 68 1147 00 00 10 1147/2762 00 00 10 1144 00 09 27 1135 00 06 34 1135/1953 00 01 05 1139 00 02 73 1139/2552 00 02 73 1140 00 01 50 1180 00 05 20 1138 00 00 10 1138/2121 00 00 10 1181 00 01 50 1213 00 02 01 1212 00 01 50 1211 00 07 39 1215 00 01 54 1210 00 01 66 1210/2511 00 00 53 1210/2884 00 00 10 1210/2885 00 02 66 1210/3006 00 03 09 1210/3009 00 03 09 1210/3016 00 02 97 1219 00 01 57 1220 00 05 27 1225 00 01 06 1224 00 07 64 1226 00 00 265844 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1223 00 03 52 1227 00 00 20
1222 00 04 18
1703 00 08 65
1709 00 00 16
1701 00 00 10
1708 00 05 28
1705 00 00 20
1707 00 06 49
1706 00 03 25
1757 00 03 39
1758 00 02 19
1759 00 01 90
1760 00 09 83
1761 00 03 42
1762 00 01 26
चकु Wडाझोला 165 00 13 15
165/399 00 01 03
169 00 21 32
169/424 00 01 53
169/427 00 01 40
169/428 00 01 30
169/429 00 01 53
201 00 00 72
201/371 00 08 49
201/372 00 00 15
201/370 00 13 70
202 00 01 26
202/366 00 00 30
202/367 00 03 61
202/368 00 02 84
207 00 11 29
211 00 01 71
211/337 00 04 87
209 00 16 86
माधपुर 533 00 01 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5845
534 00 04 77
महड़ा 236 00 11 44
238 00 01 95
239 00 02 40
239/2667 00 03 31
240 00 12 35
213 00 03 85
141 00 04 26
141/2943 00 03 29
141/2944 00 00 71
141/3166 00 00 78
141/3225 00 00 78
141/3259 00 01 57
140 00 01 57
142 00 00 10
142/2671 00 03 51
142/2788 00 03 45
142/3009 00 03 45
144 00 02 24
147 00 01 82
147/2745 00 00 38
147/2980 00 00 47
146 00 02 00
146/3212 00 02 35
145 00 05 24
168 00 06 93
168/2591 00 01 47
168/3099 00 01 03
169 00 02 28
169/3007 00 08 42
170 00 00 25
170/2583 00 00 26
170/2952 00 00 33
170/2953 00 00 27
167 00 13 95
171 00 31 57
5846 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
171/2640 00 02 50 171/2665 00 03 27 166 00 00 10 181 00 01 27 1490/2487 00 03 41 1491 00 03 03 1492 00 02 11 1594 00 04 30 1595 00 00 10 1593 00 04 51 1590 00 01 50 1498 00 10 00 1499 00 10 93 1500 00 00 72 1501 00 11 67 1576 00 01 75 1576/2886 00 00 25 1576/2887 00 00 50 1576/2888 00 00 25 1576/2889 00 00 25 1576/2986 00 00 50 1576/3173 00 06 60 1576/3277 00 00 22 1575 00 01 41 1575/3276 00 00 69 1574 00 09 70 1574/2890 00 00 19 1574/2891 00 00 19 1574/2892 00 00 55 1574/2893 00 00 19 1574/2896 00 00 11 1574/2898 00 00 10 1574/2899 00 00 18 1574/2900 00 00 10 1574/2937 00 00 37 1574/3169 00 00 37[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5847 1573 00 09 56
1573/2872 00 00 23
1573/2941 00 00 69
1512 00 08 01
1512/2926 00 08 00
1572 00 00 41
1514 00 02 19
1518 00 07 39
1518/2564 00 07 44
1518/2856 00 02 37
1519 00 02 28
1521/2560 00 05 26
1517 00 00 10
1522 00 09 18
1523 00 06 42
1406 00 21 00
1524 00 00 10
1971 00 14 92
1970 00 00 39
1969 00 02 25
1969/2867 00 14 42
1968 00 00 16
1968/2866 00 02 86
1974/2135 00 13 02
1963 00 08 66
1962 00 10 19
1961 00 20 27
1960 00 15 31
सिरिआपुर 4 00 15 69
13 00 35 70
5 00 23 56
कु सुिम 7 00 12 99
8/1124 00 10 79
8/1124/1346 00 09 50
8 00 00 23
105 00 01 27
5848 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
105/1125 00 01 49106 00 00 38
104 00 00 89
104/1295/1612 00 02 70
104/1369 00 01 65
104/1370 00 04 85
104/1653 00 03 59
104/1654 00 01 08
104/1295 00 13 69
1294 00 12 26
1292 00 15 80
86 00 00 10
85 00 05 19
84 00 01 06
80 00 00 70
81 00 01 78
83/1136 00 03 67
82 00 00 88
83 00 03 40
311 00 02 70
310 00 02 29
309 00 02 36
312 00 06 20
308 00 00 92
313 00 00 96
318 00 15 41
307 00 02 59
305 00 02 60
320 00 02 72
326 00 00 10
325 00 10 76
335 00 05 08
328 00 13 80
332 00 01 79
331 00 10 95
330 00 00 13
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5849
330/1046 00 00 10 330/1642 00 00 10 295 00 08 65 342/966 00 02 21 343 00 15 38 343/1345 00 00 60 343/1371 00 00 85 343/1585 00 00 83 344 00 18 04 292 00 01 84 292/1457 00 02 23 292/1537 00 01 53 292/1547 00 00 76 292/1551 00 00 46 292/1548 00 01 40 292/1549 00 02 75 292/1623 00 01 68 345 00 06 37 291 00 00 11 291/1077 00 15 47 291/1613 00 00 65 291/1640 00 01 54 451 00 20 08 429/980 00 08 32 429 00 08 76 430 00 06 12 430/1376 00 03 05 430/1403 00 04 56 431 00 08 41 431/1377 00 02 96 448 00 04 45 447/1334 00 04 19 447 00 09 91 1072 00 00 49 447/1336 00 03 87 447/1335 00 02 675850 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1071 00 04 73
446/1332 00 01 72
445 00 03 00
445/1602 00 03 49
445/1604 00 22 27
440 00 02 55
अजु र्नपुर 11 00 03 76
12 00 18 32
13 00 00 16
15 00 04 36
22 00 12 54
24 00 01 56
90 00 09 94
92 00 00 77
91 00 02 94
96 00 04 41
85 00 16 33
88 00 00 12
84 00 03 49
82 00 00 73
82/173 00 06 15
83 00 05 88
81 00 02 18
98 00 09 42
98/148 00 03 91
99 00 02 33
126 00 01 58
125 00 19 54
124 00 03 90
साहाला 485 00 00 79
485/1228 00 07 26
485/1229 00 03 95
486 00 16 00
477/782 00 26 29
480 00 05 69
475 00 01 46
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5851
474 00 01 66
572 00 00 10
568 00 09 55
569 00 04 91
570 00 05 32
599 00 00 14
599/1311 00 00 63
600 00 12 54
601 00 10 76
602 00 25 86
612 00 01 75
612/1135 00 01 25
612/1136 00 01 25
612/1272 00 00 74
612/1278 00 00 75
594 00 03 99
594/807 00 00 32
जुगुिड़ 571 00 09 50
570 00 06 70
580 00 15 75
583 00 09 65
577 00 10 39
1835 00 16 54
1828 00 05 09
1830 00 09 85
1831 00 01 73
1834 00 20 68
1836 00 00 67
1837 00 09 20
1838 00 15 85
1840 00 00 22
1841 00 06 47
1842 00 00 34
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट-I)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव5852 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2025.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Extraordinary Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, AlokBharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil: KUKUDAKHANDI | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
BALARAMPALLI 8 00 00 29
11 00 00 10
37 00 01 97
38 00 02 76
39 00 00 83
42 00 01 44
36 00 03 88
40 00 00 87
41 00 00 85
43 00 00 56
45 00 00 51
48 00 00 77
44 00 04 07
50 00 00 39
51 00 00 56
35 00 03 24
27 00 00 10
34 00 02 00
31 00 01 38
52 00 00 58
33 00 01 26
32 00 00 89
53 00 03 12
56 00 03 45
60 00 01 95
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5853
57 00 02 00
58 00 03 67
91 00 02 59
90 00 01 21
92 00 01 62
95 00 01 13
100 00 02 09
101 00 01 17
106 00 01 12
SATAPANDIA 2249 00 00 79
2261 00 00 62
2261/3125 00 00 60
2260 00 00 84
2260/3124 00 00 74
2259 00 00 89
2258 00 00 85
2263/3122 00 00 28
2263/3121 00 01 26
2263 00 00 28
2263/3123 00 00 28
2263/3120 00 00 51
2264 00 00 70
2265 00 00 45
2265/3363 00 00 27
2266 00 00 53
2267 00 02 28
2268 00 01 40
2269 00 01 11
2272 00 02 28
2279 00 04 19
2280 00 02 53
2281 00 01 89
2289 00 04 65
2285 00 06 95
2288 00 01 61
2127/3138 00 01 04
2127 00 01 16
2132/3132 00 00 19
2131 00 02 36
2132 00 00 10
2127/3135 00 00 67
2130/3354 00 01 52
5854 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2130 00 00 90
2129 00 01 01
2127/3136 00 00 41 2127/3137 00 00 44 2128 00 01 16 2125 00 00 61 2125/3142 00 01 24 2125/3127 00 02 50 2124 00 03 19 2123 00 01 13 2122 00 01 17 2121 00 01 43 2121/3847 00 01 32 2084 00 03 61 2084/3844 00 03 60 2291 00 03 57 2082 00 00 86 2083 00 01 56 2080 00 01 74 2081 00 00 92 2060 00 02 20 2373 00 08 87 2374/3190 00 01 63 2374/3193 00 00 10 2374 00 02 40 2375/3359 00 00 18 2375 00 01 84 2374/3189 00 01 29 2374/3192 00 01 33 2059 00 03 50 2374/3191 00 02 08 2375/3360 00 00 88 2048 00 04 77 2049 00 01 15 2047 00 08 76 2041 00 00 39 2040 00 09 56 2039 00 06 23 2033 00 01 22 2034 00 10 20 2035 00 00 10 2036 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5855 2032 00 02 95
2028 00 12 78 2027 00 00 74 2027/3740 00 00 74 2026 00 09 10 2512 00 19 00 2015 00 01 26 2556 00 01 12 2665/3361 00 02 28 2670 00 02 92 2669 00 04 50 2669/3252 00 00 48 2676 00 07 14 2678 00 00 10 2677 00 05 07 2716 00 04 28 2715 00 00 53 2711 00 01 75 2721 00 01 17 2720 00 01 09 2722 00 02 27 2723 00 00 12 2709 00 07 20 2724 00 07 33 2725 00 03 21 2729 00 04 69 2728 00 00 46 2735 00 05 00 2734/3250 00 02 69 2796 00 04 17 2803 00 03 73 2804 00 01 71 2805 00 01 51 2795 00 21 04 2795/3141 00 00 64 2813 00 09 86 2818 00 03 17 2821 00 13 79 2819 00 00 10 2823 00 03 25 2822 00 13 07 2825 00 07 285856 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2826 00 01 52
BHUDUKA 68 00 13 41
69 00 24 76
70 00 28 70
71 00 08 30
72 00 09 01
73 00 06 07
73/4173 00 04 33
74 00 17 91
75 00 04 55
76 00 00 81
3226 00 00 10
3227 00 04 55
3228 00 03 21
3228/4167 00 03 74
3229 00 07 32
3245 00 00 10
3277 00 07 77
3278 00 13 74
3287 00 00 14
3287/4168 00 00 10
3280 00 07 82
3282 00 00 10
3286 00 02 39
3285/4113 00 00 84
3285/4114 00 01 60
3285 00 02 36
3298 00 00 15
3297 00 00 40
3297/4181 00 01 57
3296 00 05 87
3304 00 00 30
3305 00 02 79
3306 00 07 74
3311 00 00 10
3310 00 00 95
3309 00 02 56
3318 00 00 44
3335 00 02 92
3334 00 04 61
3336 00 01 31
3321 00 00 49
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5857
3333 00 02 57
3339 00 00 19
3332 00 00 65 3331 00 00 18 3322 00 09 15 3112 00 07 32 3323 00 00 43 3098 00 06 82 3325 00 00 23 3097 00 04 61 3096 00 04 11 3095 00 02 25 3360 00 04 87 3094 00 00 34 3361 00 02 41 3362 00 04 74 3363 00 05 41 3369 00 09 49 3368 00 01 46 3370 00 00 23 3367 00 10 54 3467 00 07 41 3466 00 01 66 3469 00 05 95 3499 00 07 60 3497 00 03 22 3500 00 01 54 3501 00 07 27 3502 00 01 01 3509 00 07 46 3511 00 01 09 3508 00 00 10 3509/4126 00 05 74 3527 00 12 76 3529 00 00 98 3526 00 06 00 3549 00 07 03 3548 00 08 89 3550 00 00 15 3547 00 00 43 3544 00 00 80 3558 00 17 775858 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 3559 00 03 78 3560 00 01 30
3579 00 01 16
3579/4239 00 01 20
3596 00 00 61
3597 00 01 44
3595 00 01 22
3594 00 03 27
3593 00 03 70
3592 00 10 18
3591 00 04 83
3589 00 00 44
3586 00 17 29
3613 00 01 52
3614 00 07 90
BAULAJHOLI 842 00 00 34
843 00 00 10
846 00 00 10
915 00 04 95
917 00 01 52
918 00 01 00
926 00 02 21
922 00 00 45
925 00 01 46
927 00 01 64
928 00 02 05
929 00 02 21
969 00 02 38
970 00 03 89
971 00 02 02
972 00 02 68
973 00 03 03
974 00 00 10
973/2288 00 02 12
976 00 02 84
977/3152 00 03 41
977 00 00 27
978 00 03 01
978/3194 00 04 86
978/3195 00 04 03
980 00 00 78
1715 00 00 84
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5859
982 00 03 00
983 00 03 10
984 00 00 16
985 00 02 53
986 00 02 63
987 00 07 13
990 00 02 64
989 00 00 80
992 00 02 24
993 00 08 29
1000 00 00 11
999 00 06 83
1000/2275 00 00 56
1002 00 02 59
1001 00 02 50
1004 00 03 80
1006 00 05 45
1005 00 00 60
1004/3151 00 00 10
1314 00 06 99
1312/2270 00 00 10
1313 00 06 38
1317 00 00 49
1316 00 06 14
2087 00 07 17
2088 00 08 26
2089 00 04 97
BAIGANABADI 686 00 00 10
688 00 07 76
689 00 02 04
690 00 12 18
691 00 06 50
MAHUGHARA HILL 97 00 00 10
113 00 00 21
110 00 00 82
111 00 08 17
112 00 04 71
120 00 12 67
121 00 00 57
122 00 01 42
218 00 05 12
217 00 03 26
5860 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
215 00 01 89223 00 03 70
209 00 20 64
192 00 15 14
193 00 08 61
RAIJHOL 1030 00 10 17
1031 00 06 34
1039 00 02 89
1037 00 21 74
1038 00 06 22
1131 00 04 12
1132 00 01 30
1131/2503 00 00 10
1133 00 09 70
1119 00 00 18
1119/2939 00 00 26
1140 00 04 31
1141 00 02 06
1142 00 01 10
1143 00 05 49
1114 00 18 86
915 00 03 15
914 00 07 62
914/2525 00 04 40
886 00 00 10
907 00 02 77
887 00 07 01
888 00 06 86
889 00 01 95
892 00 07 75
893 00 04 63
870 00 05 45
1191 00 00 10
895 00 00 83
869 00 03 54
1193 00 00 93
868 00 02 76
1194 00 00 10
866 00 01 13
1196 00 00 10
1197 00 02 78
865 00 05 30
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5861
864 00 05 55863 00 00 92
861 00 00 20 862 00 04 41 2068 00 11 64 2069 00 00 17 2069/2652 00 00 21 2070 00 02 56 2067 00 05 16 2066 00 03 88 2065 00 01 13 2062 00 04 12 2061 00 03 77 2059 00 03 23 2060 00 02 60 2056 00 07 15 2049 00 11 53 2036 00 00 13 2038 00 01 10 2039 00 07 93 2041 00 00 10 2040 00 01 92 2010 00 03 15 2005 00 00 91 1870 00 00 10 1871 00 02 90 2003 00 05 25 1872 00 00 17 1875 00 03 90 1885 00 06 29 1886 00 01 05 1886/2694 00 02 05 1888 00 06 28 1887 00 00 24 1894 00 00 68 1893 00 03 06 1892 00 02 94 1891 00 03 90 1919 00 02 62 1920 00 00 10 1918 00 03 79 1917 00 02 035862 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1913 00 02 06 1916 00 07 12
1925 00 03 58
1926 00 00 25
1945 00 03 93
1927 00 01 51
1927/2524 00 02 61
1930 00 05 22
1943 00 00 39
1939 00 06 88
1941 00 00 14
1941/2768 00 00 20
1940 00 01 68
1938 00 00 22
1936 00 03 58
2445 00 00 33
2445/2662 00 00 48
1935 00 00 47
2446 00 03 62
2447 00 02 51
PADIRIPALLI 303 00 04 10
325 00 02 18
324 00 03 96
323 00 04 83
309 00 00 64
322 00 06 74
315 00 00 18
321 00 04 30
316 00 00 68
317 00 01 04
319 00 01 20
318 00 04 16
362 00 01 08
383 00 02 08
384 00 00 10
382 00 06 01
380 00 02 64
381 00 00 13
376 00 08 15
386/653 00 01 54
395 00 02 67
390 00 03 43
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5863
391 00 02 52
393 00 03 16
392 00 02 52
394 00 01 43
437 00 05 27
438 00 02 46
439 00 08 99
434 00 09 82
LANJIA 743 00 01 79
742 00 00 11
744 00 08 44
752 00 01 98
745 00 02 08
750 00 00 95
749 00 03 76
751 00 04 80
757 00 03 11
748 00 00 32
758 00 06 24
769 00 00 80
806 00 01 97
805 00 02 46
804 00 01 02
803 00 00 10
770 00 00 10
802 00 03 88
801 00 03 19
828 00 01 56
828/1730 00 01 49
800 00 03 74
799 00 00 23
829 00 01 31
830 00 02 32
831 00 02 46
866 00 04 41
834 00 00 12
865 00 03 60
867 00 02 04
868 00 03 36
864 00 00 47
921 00 00 40
869 00 00 19
5864 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
883 00 05 58871 00 03 03
882 00 00 26 877 00 05 16 879 00 05 24 878 00 04 74 1029 00 01 75 1030 00 02 25 1028 00 00 10 1022 00 02 87 1023 00 00 10 1031 00 00 32 1020 00 00 66 1021 00 00 79 1034 00 01 03 1041 00 02 12 1040 00 02 29 1039 00 01 15 1038 00 04 19 1044 00 00 21 1137 00 03 68 1138 00 00 10 1134 00 03 09 1136 00 01 10 1135 00 01 48 1133 00 01 27 1132 00 05 42 1126 00 01 87 1131 00 01 28 1130 00 02 40 1129 00 01 86 1127 00 06 79 1128 00 01 69 1207 00 01 63 1209 00 02 44 1206 00 03 10 1211 00 02 64 1212 00 01 39 1213 00 01 60 1214 00 04 07 1215 00 06 80 1216 00 04 60[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5865 1224 00 01 78 1225 00 03 42
1223 00 01 82 1369 00 06 80 1369/1436 00 02 09 1370 00 04 27 1366 00 01 14 1365 00 01 62 1364 00 00 51 1352 00 04 14 1351 00 02 59 1349 00 02 68 1338 00 03 41 1337 00 02 84 1350 00 02 07 1344 00 10 60 1270 00 02 11 1322 00 02 59 1323 00 04 31 1324 00 02 22 1325 00 01 79 1326 00 03 22 1327 00 01 15 1328 00 00 55 1318 00 01 31 1313 00 01 20 1314 00 01 15 1308 00 00 95 1310 00 00 10 1306 00 01 07 1309 00 00 17 1298 00 00 49 1305 00 01 02 1304 00 01 71 1299 00 00 73 1300 00 00 77 1301 00 00 54 1302 00 02 73 1296 00 01 25 1295 00 01 46 1294 00 01 34 1293 00 01 415866 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
BHAGABANPUR 563 00 04 94564/922 00 00 10
538 00 04 05 539 00 09 28 540 00 01 04 537 00 00 25 516 00 11 34 519 00 11 03 535/808 00 06 15 572 00 02 53 573 00 05 60 533 00 01 80 574/860 00 03 24 574/859 00 02 82 574/1179 00 01 54 574 00 01 29 576 00 08 40 576/1212 00 04 33 576/895 00 01 17 577 00 19 81 578 00 02 40 578/1184 00 06 60 579 00 02 22 579/1185 00 00 94 580 00 06 20 506/1031 00 00 17 581 00 01 46 582 00 05 88 582/1089 00 01 41 583 00 11 63 586 00 16 32 588 00 03 97 587 00 05 36 616 00 10 81 615 00 10 31 618 00 11 39 622 00 01 35 621 00 07 06 620 00 08 66 649 00 08 91 668 00 02 26 669 00 00 56[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5867
667 00 16 08 660 00 03 24 662 00 00 53 663 00 01 06 661 00 03 15 372 00 02 40 371 00 05 96 370 00 01 28 369 00 07 13 367 00 00 67 297 00 02 21 298 00 06 16 299/791 00 00 60 293 00 02 37 292 00 00 90 294 00 03 87 211 00 00 28 210/861 00 04 08 208 00 01 24 209 00 07 76 205 00 00 94 206 00 07 54 207 00 05 58 202 00 05 82 201 00 04 66 201/970 00 00 10 200 00 02 60 692 00 02 61 198 00 01 16 197 00 02 00 196 00 07 35 187 00 00 70 728 00 00 28 728/790 00 05 84 727 00 01 24 729 00 12 72 190 00 00 10 730 00 02 20 748 00 08 05 750 00 04 50 747 00 07 65 747/803 00 01 655868 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 747/804 00 00 78
751/890 00 05 41
756/864 00 02 77
755 00 06 71
756 00 05 43
754/778 00 00 44
756/888 00 05 87
756/887 00 02 70
759/772 00 05 80
760 00 14 00
759 00 05 09
886 00 07 16
761 00 01 95
762/845 00 06 85
762/846 00 04 36
763 00 00 72
ANANTAYI 1365 00 03 14
1366 00 04 64
1367 00 02 00
1367/2328 00 05 15
1367/2330 00 05 15
1362 00 37 40
1330 00 03 69
1476 00 04 03
1474 00 02 94
1475 00 01 61
1396 00 00 76
1397 00 00 75
2118 00 01 22
1433 00 08 65
1438 00 03 62
1438/2193 00 02 50
1437 00 01 36
1436 00 18 52
1435/2175 00 00 51
1435 00 00 51
1446 00 00 43
1449 00 08 06
1450 00 08 96
1458 00 07 25
1456 00 00 37
1457 00 00 50
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5869
1455 00 02 75
1453 00 00 58
1454 00 02 90 1466 00 04 61 1591 00 00 17 1590 00 09 45 1599 00 00 10 1589/1797 00 02 26 1589 00 00 10 1606 00 06 08 1584 00 12 45 1583 00 00 10 1582 00 03 63 1610 00 01 42 1579 00 03 46 1580 00 00 55 1580/1796 00 02 13 1578 00 02 22 1613 00 00 56 1577 00 04 56 1576 00 01 69 1575 00 00 77 1544 00 00 10 1545 00 06 54 1574 00 00 78 1572 00 00 20 1546 00 04 11 1547 00 00 10 1548 00 02 17 1571 00 03 90 1571/2187 00 01 55 1560 00 04 02 1560/2157 00 02 64 1552 00 01 26 1553 00 06 67 1554 00 04 45 1557 00 00 36 1555 00 02 56 1556 00 00 58 782 00 06 95 780 00 00 82 781 00 05 325870 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 764 00 02 53 736 00 00 70
739 00 06 89
740 00 04 08
741 00 01 30
742 00 07 34
743 00 09 01
744 00 04 08
745 00 02 30
753 00 07 46
754 00 07 84
761 00 04 50
762 00 00 53
BONTAPALLI 1157 00 05 10
1156 00 07 29
1155 00 00 99
1154 00 00 63
1159 00 04 38
1153 00 01 50
1153/2538 00 01 18
1153/2798 00 03 20
1161 00 02 23
1161/3007 00 06 68
1167 00 03 42
1166 00 06 20
1164 00 01 00
1165 00 05 17
1145 00 02 97
1146 00 02 68
1147 00 00 10
1147/2762 00 00 10
1144 00 09 27
1135 00 06 34
1135/1953 00 01 05
1139 00 02 73
1139/2552 00 02 73
1140 00 01 50
1180 00 05 20
1138 00 00 10
1138/2121 00 00 10
1181 00 01 50
1213 00 02 01
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5871
1212 00 01 50
1211 00 07 39
1215 00 01 54
1210 00 01 66
1210/2511 00 00 53
1210/2884 00 00 10
1210/2885 00 02 66
1210/3006 00 03 09
1210/3009 00 03 09
1210/3016 00 02 97
1219 00 01 57
1220 00 05 27
1225 00 01 06
1224 00 07 64
1226 00 00 26
1223 00 03 52
1227 00 00 20
1222 00 04 18
1703 00 08 65
1709 00 00 16
1701 00 00 10
1708 00 05 28
1705 00 00 20
1707 00 06 49
1706 00 03 25
1757 00 03 39
1758 00 02 19
1759 00 01 90
1760 00 09 83
1761 00 03 42
1762 00 01 26
CHAKUNDAJHOLA 165 00 13 15
165/399 00 01 03
169 00 21 32
169/424 00 01 53
169/427 00 01 40
169/428 00 01 30
169/429 00 01 53
201 00 00 72
201/371 00 08 49
201/372 00 00 15
201/370 00 13 70
5872 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
202 00 01 26
202/366 00 00 30
202/367 00 03 61
202/368 00 02 84
207 00 11 29
211 00 01 71
211/337 00 04 87
209 00 16 86
MADHAPUR 533 00 01 52
534 00 04 77
MAHADA 236 00 11 44
238 00 01 95
239 00 02 40
239/2667 00 03 31
240 00 12 35
213 00 03 85
141 00 04 26
141/2943 00 03 29
141/2944 00 00 71
141/3166 00 00 78
141/3225 00 00 78
141/3259 00 01 57
140 00 01 57
142 00 00 10
142/2671 00 03 51
142/2788 00 03 45
142/3009 00 03 45
144 00 02 24
147 00 01 82
147/2745 00 00 38
147/2980 00 00 47
146 00 02 00
146/3212 00 02 35
145 00 05 24
168 00 06 93
168/2591 00 01 47
168/3099 00 01 03
169 00 02 28
169/3007 00 08 42
170 00 00 25
170/2583 00 00 26
170/2952 00 00 33
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5873
170/2953 00 00 27
167 00 13 95 171 00 31 57 171/2640 00 02 50 171/2665 00 03 27 166 00 00 10 181 00 01 27 1490/2487 00 03 41 1491 00 03 03 1492 00 02 11 1594 00 04 30 1595 00 00 10 1593 00 04 51 1590 00 01 50 1498 00 10 00 1499 00 10 93 1500 00 00 72 1501 00 11 67 1576 00 01 75 1576/2886 00 00 25 1576/2887 00 00 50 1576/2888 00 00 25 1576/2889 00 00 25 1576/2986 00 00 50 1576/3173 00 06 60 1576/3277 00 00 22 1575 00 01 41 1575/3276 00 00 69 1574 00 09 70 1574/2890 00 00 19 1574/2891 00 00 19 1574/2892 00 00 55 1574/2893 00 00 19 1574/2896 00 00 11 1574/2898 00 00 10 1574/2899 00 00 18 1574/2900 00 00 10 1574/2937 00 00 37 1574/3169 00 00 37 1573 00 09 56 1573/2872 00 00 23 1573/2941 00 00 695874 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1512 00 08 01 1512/2926 00 08 00
1572 00 00 41
1514 00 02 19
1518 00 07 39
1518/2564 00 07 44
1518/2856 00 02 37
1519 00 02 28
1521/2560 00 05 26
1517 00 00 10
1522 00 09 18
1523 00 06 42
1406 00 21 00
1524 00 00 10
1971 00 14 92
1970 00 00 39
1969 00 02 25
1969/2867 00 14 42
1968 00 00 16
1968/2866 00 02 86
1974/2135 00 13 02
1963 00 08 66
1962 00 10 19
1961 00 20 27
1960 00 15 31
SIRIAPUR 4 00 15 69
13 00 35 70
5 00 23 56
KUSUMI 7 00 12 99
8/1124 00 10 79
8/1124/1346 00 09 50
8 00 00 23
105 00 01 27
105/1125 00 01 49
106 00 00 38
104 00 00 89
104/1295/1612 00 02 70
104/1369 00 01 65
104/1370 00 04 85
104/1653 00 03 59
104/1654 00 01 08
104/1295 00 13 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5875
1294 00 12 26
1292 00 15 80
86 00 00 10 85 00 05 19 84 00 01 06 80 00 00 70 81 00 01 78 83/1136 00 03 67 82 00 00 88 83 00 03 40 311 00 02 70 310 00 02 29 309 00 02 36 312 00 06 20 308 00 00 92 313 00 00 96 318 00 15 41 307 00 02 59 305 00 02 60 320 00 02 72 326 00 00 10 325 00 10 76 335 00 05 08 328 00 13 80 332 00 01 79 331 00 10 95 330 00 00 13 330/1046 00 00 10 330/1642 00 00 10 295 00 08 65 342/966 00 02 21 343 00 15 38 343/1345 00 00 60 343/1371 00 00 85 343/1585 00 00 83 344 00 18 04 292 00 01 84 292/1457 00 02 23 292/1537 00 01 53 292/1547 00 00 76 292/1551 00 00 46 292/1548 00 01 405876 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
292/1549 00 02 75292/1623 00 01 68
345 00 06 37
291 00 00 11
291/1077 00 15 47
291/1613 00 00 65
291/1640 00 01 54
451 00 20 08
429/980 00 08 32
429 00 08 76
430 00 06 12
430/1376 00 03 05
430/1403 00 04 56
431 00 08 41
431/1377 00 02 96
448 00 04 45
447/1334 00 04 19
447 00 09 91
1072 00 00 49
447/1336 00 03 87
447/1335 00 02 67
1071 00 04 73
446/1332 00 01 72
445 00 03 00
445/1602 00 03 49
445/1604 00 22 27
440 00 02 55
ARJUNAPUR 11 00 03 76
12 00 18 32
13 00 00 16
15 00 04 36
22 00 12 54
24 00 01 56
90 00 09 94
92 00 00 77
91 00 02 94
96 00 04 41
85 00 16 33
88 00 00 12
84 00 03 49
82 00 00 73
82/173 00 06 15
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5877
83 00 05 88
81 00 02 18
98 00 09 42
98/148 00 03 91
99 00 02 33
126 00 01 58
125 00 19 54
124 00 03 90
SAHALA 485 00 00 79
485/1228 00 07 26
485/1229 00 03 95
486 00 16 00
477/782 00 26 29
480 00 05 69
475 00 01 46
474 00 01 66
572 00 00 10
568 00 09 55
569 00 04 91
570 00 05 32
599 00 00 14
599/1311 00 00 63
600 00 12 54
601 00 10 76
602 00 25 86
612 00 01 75
612/1135 00 01 25
612/1136 00 01 25
612/1272 00 00 74
612/1278 00 00 75
594 00 03 99
594/807 00 00 32
JUGUDI 571 00 09 50
570 00 06 70
580 00 15 75
583 00 09 65
577 00 10 39
1835 00 16 54
1828 00 05 09
1830 00 09 85
1831 00 01 73
1834 00 20 68
1836 00 00 67
1837 00 09 20
1838 00 15 85
1840 00 00 22
1841 00 06 47
1842 00 00 34
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.-I)] PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
5878 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2026202620262026....————के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब6 अनुसूची में व9र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Aए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Dक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व9र्णत भूमि में हितब6 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इHीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Jी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर ,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील- कािनिस | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
47 00 09 10 46 00 12 32 51 00 05 94 70 00 08 59 69 00 01 55 72 00 14 90 68 00 01 71 67 00 05 58 66 00 00 64 594 00 16 20 593 00 00 35 561 00 04 20 651 00 08 69 688 00 08 48 701 00 00 94[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5879 689 00 08 68
पंचमा 806 00 07 56
807 00 09 84
805 00 02 14
804 00 08 54
809 00 01 02
803 00 00 63
801 00 05 11
800 00 05 79
799 00 03 82
426 00 06 29
430 00 00 11
428 00 02 78
428/2185 00 01 20
428/2186 00 02 40
443/2164 00 01 77
434 00 00 61
444 00 00 57
442 00 03 46
441 00 04 78
439 00 04 87
490 00 10 76
489 00 00 40
494 00 02 74
495 00 02 40
496 00 02 18
497 00 03 53
498 00 00 19
501 00 11 16
502 00 00 41
503 00 02 78
668 00 00 10
514 00 06 45
515 00 01 22
5880 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
542 00 00 17
519 00 19 74 519/2167 00 02 58 522 00 02 65 666 00 05 71 665 00 01 72 660 00 02 67 638 00 00 95 659 00 02 59 658 00 01 81 640 00 03 43 657 00 01 59 641 00 00 37 305 00 17 90 1189 00 08 70 1111 00 00 13 1188 00 10 47 1112 00 00 99 1115 00 02 25 1136 00 00 53 1137 00 00 25 1138 00 00 10 1187 00 02 83 1142 00 00 19 1185 00 03 16 1180 00 02 73 1181 00 01 15 1179 00 02 43 1168 00 12 40 1158 00 00 69 1159 00 07 15 1165 00 00 10 1164 00 04 88 1163 00 01 66[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5881 1162 00 00 10 2070 00 06 27
1151 00 03 63
2074 00 03 26
2071 00 06 74
2079 00 00 39
2078 00 01 51
2077 00 02 60
2076 00 00 56
2155 00 00 42
2156 00 02 04
2157 00 01 74
2143 00 00 66
2139 00 00 19
2137 00 03 14
2135 00 01 47
2134 00 02 39
2131 00 01 28
2130 00 00 60
2129 00 01 16
2125 00 00 69
गोलन्थरा 50 00 25 23
51 00 00 21
855 00 34 55
850 00 01 45
841 00 00 58
842 00 00 46
843 00 00 16
856 00 03 23
854 00 01 60
853 00 00 10
1614 00 04 94
1810 00 02 00
1811 00 04 22
5882 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1814 00 06 48
1815 00 11 06
1826 00 03 65
1816 00 01 21
1841 00 06 35
1820 00 07 94
1819 00 00 89
1843 00 01 72
1850 00 06 54
1849 00 05 48
1854 00 16 37
1855 00 05 73
1856 00 01 12
1857 00 01 91
1858 00 00 10
1859 00 12 17
1876 00 00 87
1877 00 00 76
1880 00 02 05
1881 00 05 29
1882 00 07 12
1885 00 10 44
भािलआगड़ 249 00 10 61
245 00 02 98
244 00 01 61
243 00 00 74
242 00 06 06
241 00 00 82
240 00 07 40
239 00 07 10
16 00 01 93
17 00 00 15
18 00 05 76
19 00 05 45
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5883
20 00 07 28
21 00 03 88
23 00 06 09 26 00 21 82 26/3010 00 01 07 29 00 10 72 33 00 00 10 68 00 10 26 71 00 02 99 72 00 02 76 73 00 03 45 77 00 04 99 78 00 00 33 79 00 06 79 80 00 01 18 82 00 00 14 82/2480 00 00 22 82/2612 00 00 11 137 00 06 10 136 00 10 00 110 00 00 99 111 00 06 82 112 00 00 10 115 00 00 42 116 00 01 82 117 00 06 63 117/2440 00 10 31 124 00 01 18 123 00 02 26
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट-I)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2026.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana), "Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
5884 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : KANISI | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
SUNADEI 48 00 26 45
47 00 09 10
46 00 12 32
51 00 05 94
70 00 08 59
69 00 01 55
72 00 14 90
68 00 01 71
67 00 05 58
66 00 00 64
594 00 16 20
593 00 00 35
561 00 04 20
651 00 08 69
688 00 08 48
701 00 00 94
689 00 08 68
PANCHAMA 806 00 07 56
807 00 09 84
805 00 02 14
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5885
804 00 08 54809 00 01 02
803 00 00 63 801 00 05 11 800 00 05 79 799 00 03 82 426 00 06 29 430 00 00 11 428 00 02 78 428/2185 00 01 20 428/2186 00 02 40 443/2164 00 01 77 434 00 00 61 444 00 00 57 442 00 03 46 441 00 04 78 439 00 04 87 490 00 10 76 489 00 00 40 494 00 02 74 495 00 02 40 496 00 02 18 497 00 03 53 498 00 00 19 501 00 11 16 502 00 00 41 503 00 02 78 668 00 00 10 514 00 06 45 515 00 01 22 542 00 00 175886 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 519 00 19 74 519/2167 00 02 58
522 00 02 65 666 00 05 71 665 00 01 72 660 00 02 67 638 00 00 95 659 00 02 59 658 00 01 81 640 00 03 43 657 00 01 59 641 00 00 37 305 00 17 90 1189 00 08 70 1111 00 00 13 1188 00 10 47 1112 00 00 99 1115 00 02 25 1136 00 00 53 1137 00 00 25 1138 00 00 10 1187 00 02 83 1142 00 00 19 1185 00 03 16 1180 00 02 73 1181 00 01 15 1179 00 02 43 1168 00 12 40 1158 00 00 69 1159 00 07 15 1165 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5887 1164 00 04 88 1163 00 01 66
1162 00 00 10
2070 00 06 27
1151 00 03 63
2074 00 03 26
2071 00 06 74
2079 00 00 39
2078 00 01 51
2077 00 02 60
2076 00 00 56
2155 00 00 42
2156 00 02 04
2157 00 01 74
2143 00 00 66
2139 00 00 19
2137 00 03 14
2135 00 01 47
2134 00 02 39
2131 00 01 28
2130 00 00 60
2129 00 01 16
2125 00 00 69
GOLANTHARA 50 00 25 23
51 00 00 21
855 00 34 55
850 00 01 45
841 00 00 58
842 00 00 46
843 00 00 16
856 00 03 23
5888 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
854 00 01 60
853 00 00 10
1614 00 04 94
1810 00 02 00
1811 00 04 22
1814 00 06 48
1815 00 11 06
1826 00 03 65
1816 00 01 21
1841 00 06 35
1820 00 07 94
1819 00 00 89
1843 00 01 72
1850 00 06 54
1849 00 05 48
1854 00 16 37
1855 00 05 73
1856 00 01 12
1857 00 01 91
1858 00 00 10
1859 00 12 17
1876 00 00 87
1877 00 00 76
1880 00 02 05
1881 00 05 29
1882 00 07 12
1885 00 10 44
BHALIAGADA 249 00 10 61
245 00 02 98
244 00 01 61
243 00 00 74
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5889
242 00 06 06
241 00 00 82
240 00 07 40 239 00 07 10 16 00 01 93 17 00 00 15 18 00 05 76 19 00 05 45 20 00 07 28 21 00 03 88 23 00 06 09 26 00 21 82 26/3010 00 01 07 29 00 10 72 33 00 00 10 68 00 10 26 71 00 02 99 72 00 02 76 73 00 03 45 77 00 04 99 78 00 00 33 79 00 06 79 80 00 01 18 82 00 00 14 82/2480 00 00 22 82/2612 00 00 11 137 00 06 10 136 00 10 00 110 00 00 99 111 00 06 82 112 00 00 105890 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 115 00 00 42 116 00 01 82
117 00 06 63 117/2440 00 10 31 124 00 01 18 123 00 02 26
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.-I)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2027202720272027....———— के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाब6 अनुसूची में व9र्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है,उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत:अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,1962 (1962का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Aए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Dक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व9र्णत भूमि में हितब6 है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इHीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में Jी दिल्लीप कु मार महांति, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील-पात्रपुर | िजला - गंजाम | राज्य -ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
गुिड़पदर 326 00 05 11
392 00 00 81
393 00 02 80
394 00 01 20
395 00 00 46
396 00 00 29
349 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5891
351 00 00 65
352 00 02 88
360 00 00 26 361 00 03 09 362 00 07 29 363 00 01 25 365 00 00 96 298 00 00 20 297 00 01 40 296 00 04 84 295 00 00 67 301 00 00 16 302 00 01 16 293 00 02 25 292 00 01 93 291 00 00 10 290 00 02 79 289 00 01 93 288 00 00 10 287 00 00 80 286 00 02 45 285 00 01 10 284 00 00 10 419 00 01 01 425 00 03 31 424 00 01 91 465 00 00 11 426 00 04 02 427 00 04 88 428 00 02 70 448 00 02 47 447 00 00 18 446 00 04 10 445 00 02 07 444 00 00 115892 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 440 00 00 13 434 00 00 10
436 00 02 65 439 00 01 11 438 00 01 48 437 00 01 06 491 00 00 12 492 00 01 33 493 00 00 10 495 00 00 16 712 00 01 04 716 00 00 48 713 00 05 93 714 00 01 23 715 00 06 04 711 00 00 62 736 00 00 27 739 00 02 56 740 00 04 29 741 00 03 52 742 00 03 65 691 00 06 13 690 00 04 27 693 00 00 59 694 00 00 14 687 00 06 67 688 00 01 05 822 00 06 56 823 00 01 78 821 00 03 66 824 00 04 67 825 00 04 75 833 00 02 71 834 00 02 46 837 00 00 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5893 832 00 05 96 831 00 08 39
830 00 00 79
ब्राWणनुआगाँ
1810 00 04 33
1810/2664 00 01 49
1815 00 02 67
1814 00 00 27
1816 00 07 36
1819 00 05 05
1869 00 01 69
1870 00 08 30
1901 00 01 42
1902 00 00 16
1871 00 04 53
1872 00 02 48
1873 00 00 49
1873/2702 00 00 41
1900 00 09 16
1896 00 02 96
1940 00 00 15
1942 00 00 12
1897 00 02 16
1899 00 00 35
1895 00 02 18
1957 00 06 29
1954 00 02 12
1952 00 01 52
1953 00 01 25
1953/2692 00 00 76
1955 00 00 52
1555/2735 00 03 27
1965 00 01 12
1967 00 01 65
1968 00 05 46
5894 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1969 00 03 29
1970 00 01 23
2513 00 00 92 1971 00 02 91 1978 00 06 52 1979 00 02 05 1981 00 02 22 1980 00 01 62 1982 00 00 30 1977 00 00 37 1985 00 02 12 1986 00 00 18 2018 00 00 10 1991 00 01 96 2021 00 04 70 2022 00 01 78 2023 00 00 10 2020 00 03 37 2024 00 00 48 2017 00 01 80 2016 00 01 59 2015 00 00 24 2013 00 04 40 2012 00 02 78 2455 00 00 76 2069/2685 00 00 61 2446 00 03 28 2444 00 12 03 2443 00 00 63 2409 00 01 13 2410 00 01 36 2411 00 06 79 2412 00 01 42 2069 00 00 75 2413 00 06 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5895 2414 00 00 26 2371 00 05 10
2374 00 01 59
2358 00 09 74
2357/2688 00 00 25
2359 00 00 10
2360 00 01 26
2361 00 04 79
2362 00 00 39
2123 00 02 05
2124 00 00 32
2126 00 03 34
2139 00 00 27
2140 00 02 73
2141 00 01 50
2155 00 02 62
2156 00 03 22
2157 00 00 24
2169 00 03 33
2170 00 01 59
2173 00 02 08
2174 00 01 85
2175 00 01 00
2165 00 07 63
2166 00 03 86
2164 00 00 10
2167 00 01 38
2168 00 02 17
सरधापुर 487 00 03 18
486 00 16 19
485 00 03 19
484 00 06 13
483 00 02 34
463 00 01 27
469 00 00 57
5896 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
470 00 01 37 473 00 03 11 474 00 03 12 475 00 01 01 476 00 00 83 477 00 00 64 471 00 01 17 472 00 03 84 541 00 01 99 542 00 00 98 543 00 02 21 561 00 00 70 550 00 01 34 560 00 05 03 551 00 00 10 552 00 00 17 553 00 00 22 554 00 00 24 555 00 02 50 556 00 01 33 557 00 01 90 558 00 00 47 579 00 00 64 580 00 02 87 581 00 01 45 1492 00 03 76 1491 00 01 95 1493 00 01 65 1494 00 02 01 1495 00 10 85 1496 00 02 94 1499 00 04 01 1500 00 05 68 1505 00 07 11 1506 00 00 37[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5897 1507 00 00 10 1510 00 02 02
1511 00 02 20 1512 00 15 49 1477 00 06 66 1476 00 00 11 1519 00 00 80 1474 00 00 97 1520 00 10 42 1596 00 05 47 1521 00 00 10 1522 00 00 99 1595 00 01 28 1525 00 01 97 1526 00 01 89 1528 00 00 33 1592 00 01 81 1524 00 05 94 1348 00 01 13 1349 00 02 83 1350 00 01 24 1346 00 02 36 1344 00 04 81 1343 00 04 79 1292 00 01 66 1293 00 10 92 1296 00 02 34 1289 00 01 38 1290 00 02 96 1291 00 04 10 1165 00 01 43 1247 00 00 23 1246 00 03 87 1245 00 03 89 1244 00 00 765898 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1243 00 01 10 1242 00 00 77
1241 00 03 46
1240 00 00 39
1178 00 03 61
1179 00 03 78
1180 00 03 22
1181 00 00 63
1233 00 07 14
1234 00 04 98
1235 00 00 41
1253 00 04 14
1254 00 00 46
पमागाँ 303 00 03 17
263 00 01 28
289 00 04 92
290 00 02 00
292 00 00 87
293 00 00 92
288 00 00 73
287 00 00 10
294 00 02 54
295 00 01 90
269 00 02 60
282 00 03 58
281 00 01 97
280 00 01 37
279 00 01 18
269 00 02 60
266 00 00 10
271 00 01 03
272 00 00 85
273 00 00 36
274 00 00 63
265 00 01 45
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5899
264 00 09 78
434 00 00 41
309 00 31 07 430 00 00 99 431 00 01 89 398 00 00 94 399 00 03 15 400 00 04 01 401 00 04 55 402 00 02 62 403 00 02 54 404 00 02 81 405 00 00 52 388 00 01 87 384 00 00 37 382 00 02 62 380 00 03 39 378 00 01 32 377 00 00 79 376 00 00 85 375 00 00 21 351 00 03 78 352 00 00 14 355 00 00 30 356 00 00 47 357 00 02 95 374 00 02 46 373 00 03 25 371 00 06 07 368 00 00 65 467 00 01 12 468 00 01 25 471 00 07 11 482 00 04 83 481 00 02 205900 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
486 00 02 51487 00 03 30
488 00 01 99
516 00 01 70
511 00 01 60
510 00 02 80
512 00 05 90
549 00 00 25
509 00 13 52
564 00 01 72
565 00 01 30
566 00 00 30
500 00 02 27
508 00 00 71
499 00 02 74
498 00 02 27
497 00 00 25
978 00 05 52
979 00 05 69
980 00 05 34
981 00 00 42
खड़ेंगा राजेन्(cid:16)पुर 1952 00 00 18
1953 00 01 77
1954 00 03 87
1955 00 00 92
1984 00 11 54
1958 00 01 75
1959 00 04 92
1961 00 00 86
1969 00 01 51
1970 00 05 51
1971 00 02 06
1968 00 02 12
1972 00 03 70
1979 00 00 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5901
1973 00 04 57
1974 00 00 77
1975 00 03 19 1937 00 00 10 2036 00 00 57 2037 00 03 50 2038 00 00 77 2039 00 01 93 2040 00 00 53 2035 00 02 58 2022 00 00 13 2021 00 01 27 2042 00 05 84 2064 00 00 87 2065 00 03 87 2066 00 02 70 2071 00 01 00 2069 00 05 11 2070 00 00 48 2073 00 05 76 2074 00 00 30 2139 00 01 25 2140 00 04 29 2137 00 00 90 2138 00 01 83 2091 00 00 19 2092 00 02 82 2093 00 02 82 2094 00 00 36 2090 00 02 01
[फा. सं. आर-25011/18/2017-ओआर-I (पार्ट-I)]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव5902 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2027.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil: PATRAPUR | District : GANJAM | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
GUDIPADAR 326 00 05 11
392 00 00 81
393 00 02 80
394 00 01 20
395 00 00 46
396 00 00 29
349 00 00 10
351 00 00 65
352 00 02 88
360 00 00 26
361 00 03 09
362 00 07 29
363 00 01 25
365 00 00 96
298 00 00 20
297 00 01 40
296 00 04 84
295 00 00 67
301 00 00 16
302 00 01 16
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5903
293 00 02 25
292 00 01 93
291 00 00 10 290 00 02 79 289 00 01 93 288 00 00 10 287 00 00 80 286 00 02 45 285 00 01 10 284 00 00 10 419 00 01 01 425 00 03 31 424 00 01 91 465 00 00 11 426 00 04 02 427 00 04 88 428 00 02 70 448 00 02 47 447 00 00 18 446 00 04 10 445 00 02 07 444 00 00 11 440 00 00 13 434 00 00 10 436 00 02 65 439 00 01 11 438 00 01 48 437 00 01 06 491 00 00 12 492 00 01 33 493 00 00 10 495 00 00 16 712 00 01 04 716 00 00 48 713 00 05 93 714 00 01 235904 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 715 00 06 04 711 00 00 62
736 00 00 27
739 00 02 56
740 00 04 29
741 00 03 52
742 00 03 65
691 00 06 13
690 00 04 27
693 00 00 59
694 00 00 14
687 00 06 67
688 00 01 05
822 00 06 56
823 00 01 78
821 00 03 66
824 00 04 67
825 00 04 75
833 00 02 71
834 00 02 46
837 00 00 10
832 00 05 96
831 00 08 39
830 00 00 79
BRAMHANANUAGAON
1810 00 04 33
1810/2664 00 01 49
1815 00 02 67
1814 00 00 27
1816 00 07 36
1819 00 05 05
1869 00 01 69
1870 00 08 30
1901 00 01 42
1902 00 00 16
1871 00 04 53
1872 00 02 48
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5905
1873 00 00 49
1873/2702 00 00 41
1900 00 09 16 1896 00 02 96 1940 00 00 15 1942 00 00 12 1897 00 02 16 1899 00 00 35 1895 00 02 18 1957 00 06 29 1954 00 02 12 1952 00 01 52 1953 00 01 25 1953/2692 00 00 76 1955 00 00 52 1555/2735 00 03 27 1965 00 01 12 1967 00 01 65 1968 00 05 46 1969 00 03 29 1970 00 01 23 2513 00 00 92 1971 00 02 91 1978 00 06 52 1979 00 02 05 1981 00 02 22 1980 00 01 62 1982 00 00 30 1977 00 00 37 1985 00 02 12 1986 00 00 18 2018 00 00 10 1991 00 01 96 2021 00 04 70 2022 00 01 78 2023 00 00 105906 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2020 00 03 37 2024 00 00 48
2017 00 01 80 2016 00 01 59 2015 00 00 24 2013 00 04 40 2012 00 02 78 2455 00 00 76 2069/2685 00 00 61 2446 00 03 28 2444 00 12 03 2443 00 00 63 2409 00 01 13 2410 00 01 36 2411 00 06 79 2412 00 01 42 2069 00 00 75 2413 00 06 83 2414 00 00 26 2371 00 05 10 2374 00 01 59 2358 00 09 74 2357/2688 00 00 25 2359 00 00 10 2360 00 01 26 2361 00 04 79 2362 00 00 39 2123 00 02 05 2124 00 00 32 2126 00 03 34 2139 00 00 27 2140 00 02 73 2141 00 01 50 2155 00 02 62 2156 00 03 22 2157 00 00 24[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5907 2169 00 03 33
2170 00 01 59
2173 00 02 08
2174 00 01 85
2175 00 01 00
2165 00 07 63
2166 00 03 86
2164 00 00 10
2167 00 01 38
2168 00 02 17
SARADHAPUR 487 00 03 18
486 00 16 19
485 00 03 19
484 00 06 13
483 00 02 34
463 00 01 27
469 00 00 57
470 00 01 37
473 00 03 11
474 00 03 12
475 00 01 01
476 00 00 83
477 00 00 64
471 00 01 17
472 00 03 84
541 00 01 99
542 00 00 98
543 00 02 21
561 00 00 70
550 00 01 34
560 00 05 03
551 00 00 10
552 00 00 17
553 00 00 22
554 00 00 24
555 00 02 50
5908 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
556 00 01 33557 00 01 90
558 00 00 47 579 00 00 64 580 00 02 87 581 00 01 45 1492 00 03 76 1491 00 01 95 1493 00 01 65 1494 00 02 01 1495 00 10 85 1496 00 02 94 1499 00 04 01 1500 00 05 68 1505 00 07 11 1506 00 00 37 1507 00 00 10 1510 00 02 02 1511 00 02 20 1512 00 15 49 1477 00 06 66 1476 00 00 11 1519 00 00 80 1474 00 00 97 1520 00 10 42 1596 00 05 47 1521 00 00 10 1522 00 00 99 1595 00 01 28 1525 00 01 97 1526 00 01 89 1528 00 00 33 1592 00 01 81 1524 00 05 94 1348 00 01 13 1349 00 02 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5909 1350 00 01 24 1346 00 02 36
1344 00 04 81
1343 00 04 79
1292 00 01 66
1293 00 10 92
1296 00 02 34
1289 00 01 38
1290 00 02 96
1291 00 04 10
1165 00 01 43
1247 00 00 23
1246 00 03 87
1245 00 03 89
1244 00 00 76
1243 00 01 10
1242 00 00 77
1241 00 03 46
1240 00 00 39
1178 00 03 61
1179 00 03 78
1180 00 03 22
1181 00 00 63
1233 00 07 14
1234 00 04 98
1235 00 00 41
1253 00 04 14
1254 00 00 46
PAMMAGAN 303 00 03 17
263 00 01 28
289 00 04 92
290 00 02 00
292 00 00 87
293 00 00 92
288 00 00 73
287 00 00 10
5910 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
294 00 02 54
295 00 01 90
269 00 02 60 282 00 03 58 281 00 01 97 280 00 01 37 279 00 01 18 269 00 02 60 266 00 00 10 271 00 01 03 272 00 00 85 273 00 00 36 274 00 00 63 265 00 01 45 264 00 09 78 434 00 00 41 309 00 31 07 430 00 00 99 431 00 01 89 398 00 00 94 399 00 03 15 400 00 04 01 401 00 04 55 402 00 02 62 403 00 02 54 404 00 02 81 405 00 00 52 388 00 01 87 384 00 00 37 382 00 02 62 380 00 03 39 378 00 01 32 377 00 00 79 376 00 00 85 375 00 00 21 351 00 03 78[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5911 352 00 00 14 355 00 00 30
356 00 00 47
357 00 02 95
374 00 02 46
373 00 03 25
371 00 06 07
368 00 00 65
467 00 01 12
468 00 01 25
471 00 07 11
482 00 04 83
481 00 02 20
486 00 02 51
487 00 03 30
488 00 01 99
516 00 01 70
511 00 01 60
510 00 02 80
512 00 05 90
549 00 00 25
509 00 13 52
564 00 01 72
565 00 01 30
566 00 00 30
500 00 02 27
508 00 00 71
499 00 02 74
498 00 02 27
497 00 00 25
978 00 05 52
979 00 05 69
980 00 05 34
981 00 00 42
KHADANGARAJENDRAPUR 1952 00 00 18
1953 00 01 77
5912 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1954 00 03 87
1955 00 00 92
1984 00 11 54 1958 00 01 75 1959 00 04 92 1961 00 00 86 1969 00 01 51 1970 00 05 51 1971 00 02 06 1968 00 02 12 1972 00 03 70 1979 00 00 10 1973 00 04 57 1974 00 00 77 1975 00 03 19 1937 00 00 10 2036 00 00 57 2037 00 03 50 2038 00 00 77 2039 00 01 93 2040 00 00 53 2035 00 02 58 2022 00 00 13 2021 00 01 27 2042 00 05 84 2064 00 00 87 2065 00 03 87 2066 00 02 70 2071 00 01 00 2069 00 05 11 2070 00 00 48 2073 00 05 76 2074 00 00 30 2139 00 01 25 2140 00 04 29 2137 00 00 90[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5913
2138 00 01 83 2091 00 00 19 2092 00 02 82 2093 00 02 82 2094 00 00 36 2090 00 02 01
[F. No. R-25011/18/2017-OR-I (Pt.-I)]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 2028202820282028....————कें (cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक हित में यह आवश्यक है कि आंX प्रदेश राज्य में पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के Yियान्वयन हेतु इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और कें (cid:16)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमी में जो इससे ऊपाब6 अनुसूची में व9र्णत है, और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अतः अब, के न्(cid:16)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Aए उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई भी Dक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में व9र्णत भूमि में हितब6 है, उस तारीख से, जिसको इस अधिसूचना में युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं, इHीस (21) दिन के भीतर, भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के संबन्ध में Jी के . ए. एस जेन्निसन, सक्षम प्राधिकारी (आंX प्रदेश), इंिडयन ऑयल कॉप+रेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइन प्रभाग), पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, प्लॉट संख्या 33,कनका दुर्गा ऑफिसर्स कॉलोनी, गुhनानक नगर मेन रोड िवजयवाड़ा-520008, आंX प्रदेश राज्य को लिखित रूप से आक्षेप भेज सके गा ।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| जिला : वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य : आँX प्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | jाम का नाम | सवk नम्बर | क्ष ेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वगर्मीटर | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
चिंतलापूड़ी प्रगड़ावरम रास्ता (1007) 00 13 53
1279/6 00 00 09
1279/5 00 12 66
1279/4 00 05 62
1279/3 00 06 34
1279/2 00 05 46
1279/1 00 02 78
1278/2 00 05 05
5914 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1278/1 00 08 48
1000/13 00 00 38 1278/3 00 00 79 1000/12 00 04 33 1000/11 00 03 93 1000/10 00 02 91 1277/3 00 23 80 1277/1 00 23 62 1276 00 31 07 991/2 00 01 41 991/1E 00 21 21 991/1A 00 17 62 990/9 00 01 91 990/1 00 10 04 990/2 00 13 62 987\1 00 12 19 988 00 05 91 1167/5 00 03 04 1167/3 00 27 10 1167/2 00 07 92 1168/1 00 01 71 1165/3 00 10 18 1166/1 00 23 67 720 00 08 04 724 00 09 94 722 00 68 11 1151/1 00 10 68 1151/6 00 03 58 1151/5 00 17 25 1150/12 00 00 07 1150/4 00 19 12 1150/7 00 07 06 1150/6 00 06 58 1150/2 00 08 44 1145/3 00 11 99[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5915
1145/2 00 08 181145/4 00 07 44
1145/1 00 08 27
1144/21 00 00 23
1144/20 00 05 52
1144/17 00 00 48
1144/18 00 09 47
1143/4 00 16 32
1142/3 00 14 10
1142/1 00 12 76
671\2 00 34 25
670A 00 14 76
601/4E 00 01 39
601/4C 00 00 22
601/3 00 00 63
602/2 00 00 61
602/1C 00 17 38
602/1B 00 02 21
602/1A 00 14 95
603/5 00 06 87
603/4 00 12 77
क्mा रास्ता (603/2) 00 03 12
606/2 00 24 86
606/1B 00 07 72
606/1A 00 06 19
605/2 00 07 84
605/1 00 05 09
575/3A 00 00 06
575/2A 00 28 21
574/3 00 04 22
574/2 00 17 05
532\2 00 18 13
532\1 00 11 56
533/1 00 27 54
556 00 25 37
5916 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
555 00 34 00
557 00 22 94
235/1B 00 17 35 235/1A 00 03 64 247/2 00 04 10 246/1 00 00 67 248/4 00 07 24 248/1 00 13 91 248/2 00 06 15 रास्ता (252) 00 03 64 225/2 00 17 83 225/1 00 03 13 224/1 00 06 36 226 00 17 04 227 00 36 23 217/2B 00 06 29 217/2A 00 04 22 217/1 00 13 56 210/6 00 16 46 210/5 00 19 26 210/7 00 00 13 211/2 00 00 55 216/2 00 12 86 216/1 00 10 83 214/5 00 05 75 214/4 00 04 79 214/3 00 05 15 214/2 00 05 23 214/1 00 16 59 138 00 31 23 163/3 00 00 17 163/5 00 17 76 163/4 00 20 34 162/3 00 09 27 162/2 00 08 62[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5917 162/1 00 09 47
157/5 00 01 20 157/2 00 04 43 159 00 25 91
राज्य राजमार्ग – 43
00 04 42
(158/5)
158/4 00 14 46
158/3 00 09 37
6 00 28 27
2 2 30 92
चिंतलापूड़ी वेंकमपालेम क्mा रास्ता (93) 00 02 83
94/2 00 22 98
83/4 00 14 97
77/29 00 02 21
75/7A 00 12 08
75/6 00 02 44
75/7 00 10 53
75/3/B 00 02 59
75/3/A 00 02 79
75/2 00 00 44
75/4 00 00 86
77/16 00 02 94
77/15 00 02 51
76/5 00 00 20
77/14 00 04 82
77/13 00 07 27
76/4 00 00 99
77/12 00 05 77
77/11 00 04 23
77/10 00 03 75
नाला (61) 00 02 66
62/4/B 00 00 65
62/5/A 00 06 23
62/4/A 00 05 95
62/3 00 05 07
5918 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
62/7 00 00 29
63/8/A 00 00 44
62/2 00 05 65
62/1 00 06 62
नाला(63/7) 00 01 66
63/6 00 00 54
63/5 00 05 00
63/4 00 03 71
63/3 00 04 99
63/1 00 14 62
55/3 00 08 31
54/2 00 41 91
54/1 00 00 38
53/1C 00 09 94
53/1B 00 03 06
चिंतलापूड़ी तलार्लापल्लि 84/8 00 33 70
84/7 00 29 39
84/5 00 02 21
84/2 00 30 46
84/3 00 11 34
85 00 32 86
86 00 76 50
87/2 00 00 30
87/1 00 07 79
54 00 03 96
52 00 49 27
नाला(51/2) 00 03 24
51/3B 00 06 20
51/3A 00 21 77
50/1A 00 10 12
46 00 02 70
44/2A 00 08 81
43/1A 00 47 43
40/1A 00 04 54
41 00 01 39
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5919
27/3 00 19 9528/2B 00 02 16
28/2A 00 09 38
29/5 00 05 66
29/4 00 10 66
29/3 00 08 91
29/2 00 02 54
30/2 00 30 09
31/4 00 04 32
30/1 00 00 11
31/1 00 04 42
टी. नरसापुरम तेnलम 103 00 43 17
102/1I 00 25 34
102/1K 00 08 84
102/1F 00 03 04
102/1E 00 09 24
102/1B 00 13 18
102/1A 00 05 28
102/1C 00 00 24
119/1 00 15 90
111/1 00 09 83
111/1B 00 14 10
111/1A 00 08 95
111/1C 00 02 37
112 00 10 40
113 00 12 84
114 00 19 66
टी. नरसापुरम लिंगरावुपालेम 6 00 05 40
7/6 00 21 78
7/7 00 01 33
8/4 00 10 90
9/6 00 23 17
9/1 00 19 25
10 00 06 41
11/6 00 02 92
5920 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11/5 00 10 31
11/3 00 10 80
11/2 00 00 53
टी. नरसापुरम Jीरामावरम 187/5 00 42 85
189/1 00 03 40
189/4 00 04 03
189/3 00 01 36
201/4 00 12 65
201/3 00 06 55
201/2 00 00 63
200/3 00 09 77
200/1 00 06 91
199/2 00 05 88
199/1 00 03 50
193/11 00 15 30
193/10 00 25 46
193/4 00 06 88
193/5 00 06 88
193/3 00 26 41
टी. नरसापुरम कृ ष्णारावुपालेम 4 00 51 45
3 00 67 81
2 00 48 97
10/3 00 03 32
10/2 00 18 96
द्वारकातिhमला आई. एस. राघवापुरम 481\1A 00 16 20
480\1 00 38 58
476\6A 00 10 41
476\2 00 09 08
476\1 00 04 74
474\4 00 02 82
474\3 00 24 90
474\1 00 05 22
473 00 15 95
459\4 00 20 22
459\3 00 11 23
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5921
459\2 00 06 00
459\1 00 16 25
458\2 00 09 32
458\3 00 02 84
458\1 00 10 35
451\2 00 32 22
444 00 06 49
445\2 00 03 41
445\1 00 07 34
443\2 00 23 74
438/2A 00 26 31
कmारास्ता(437) 00 01 42
435\2B 00 00 71
435\2A 00 57 98
432\1 00 28 66
431 00 14 20
कmारास्ता(430) 00 04 39
205 00 03 48
209/1 00 99 63
208/1B 00 00 81
210\2 00 08 98
203 00 00 44
210\1 00 00 22
196/1 00 05 28
नहर(196/2) 00 07 70
196/3A 00 37 08
कmारास्ता(194) 00 08 22
181 00 57 86
182 00 39 72
183 00 56 23
144/2 00 00 17
134 00 64 05
133 00 54 79
123/1 00 23 88
121/3 00 00 03
5922 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
123/2 00 02 25
121/4 00 11 22
120 00 03 00
द्वारकातिhमला जी. कोत्तापल्ली 10/2L2 00 04 72
10/2C 00 00 25
देवारापल्ली यदावोलु 118-6C 00 04 99
118-2B 00 00 12
255/1D 00 02 03
गोपालपुरम वडलागु ंटा 12 00 61 17
वेल्लाचिंतलागुडेम 590-2D 00 05 61
कोqयालागुडेम कं का(िcid:16)पुरम 96 00 42 79
राजवाराम 483/2 00 39 33
214 00 53 65
तल्लापुडी तुपाकु लागुडेम 163 00 35 69
175 00 74 59
223 00 02 21
अन्नादेवरपेटा 288/2C 00 20 63
351 00 32 10
कामावरपुकोटा यडावल्लि रास्ता (120) 00 02 38
121/1E 00 08 19
121/1B 00 02 48
121/1A 00 05 45
121/2 00 19 47
127 00 03 42
128/9 00 11 49
128/8 00 07 44
130 00 02 00
132/2 00 22 85
97/2 00 22 46
98 00 28 39
79 00 22 05
78 00 25 64
77/7 00 11 21
77/6 00 01 29
77/5 00 02 88
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5923
77/4 00 06 23
77/2 00 07 55
82/2 00 30 68
रास्ता (82/3) 00 04 25
49 00 10 28
83/1 00 00 33
46/1 00 16 72
48/3 00 27 33
43 00 02 86
42 00 01 18
41 00 50 31
रास्ता (40) 00 04 70
184/1 00 21 80
185/5 00 07 80
185/4 00 06 97
185/3 00 06 98
185/2 00 06 69
185/1 00 08 66
186/2 00 10 27
186/3 00 14 19
कmा रास्ता (186/1) 00 02 30
192 00 41 35
193 00 02 10
कामावरपुकोटा रामन्नापालेम 57 00 45 46
58/1 00 00 19
61/2 00 17 15
61/1 00 16 66
64/2 00 40 12
66/5 00 01 30
66/4 00 09 13
66/3 00 02 95
66/2 00 04 49
66/1 00 04 15
67 00 19 06
75/4 00 18 90
5924 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
76/4 00 13 13
76/3 00 11 18
13/1 00 10 68
13/2 00 37 27
11/3 00 00 18
11/2 00 15 12
16/3 00 11 16
16/1 00 09 56
18/7 00 04 72
18/6 00 03 99
18/5 00 04 42
18/4 00 11 65
18/3 00 03 68
18/2 00 03 74
18/1 00 01 35
20/2 00 00 13
20/1 00 00 17
19/4/B 00 07 73
19/4/A 00 03 66
19/3 00 12 60
कmा रास्ता (19/2) 00 01 45
कामावरपुकोटा कामावरपुकोटा 654 00 00 90
653/7 00 11 21
653/1 00 19 68
राज्य राजमार्ग -४४(652) 00 04 67
658/2 00 19 71
657/2 00 00 78
659 00 33 72
कmा रास्ता(660) 00 05 12
661/4 00 08 37
661/3 00 00 01
661/2 00 11 34
664/4 00 07 26
664/3 00 07 02
664/2 00 07 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5925
664/1 00 09 65
कmा रास्ता(671) 00 01 53
667/7 00 28 32
630 00 19 29
कmारास्ता(629) 00 01 92
628/1 00 21 75
628/2 00 23 27
627/4 00 00 51
627/3 00 20 40
कmा रास्ता(627/6) 00 01 27
625/2 00 17 77
625/1 00 17 51
624/1 00 21 30
कmा रास्ता (623) 00 04 21
597/2 00 46 91
595/3 00 11 41
595/4 00 09 44
595/1 00 02 39
594/4 00 05 04
594/3 00 00 17
582 00 07 11
583/1 00 31 85
नाला (583/2) 00 01 60
584 00 08 33
574/1 00 03 20
574/2 00 08 85
52 00 04 34
51/1B 00 00 17
51/3 00 19 06
531/1 00 14 10
531/5 00 02 14
50/2 00 00 08
49/1 00 06 56
49/2 00 26 60
48 00 02 78
5926 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
47/2 00 27 94
64 00 02 11
65/2 00 11 88
65/1 00 29 91
76/2 00 07 83
76/1 00 09 42
75/9 00 03 90
75/10 00 03 63
75/7 00 07 98
75/6 00 02 23
कmा रास्ता (79) 00 03 50
92/2A 00 00 28
92/1A 00 08 13
92/1B 00 08 56
92/1C 00 00 48
82/3 00 06 46
82/2 00 03 44
82/1 00 24 54
83/2 00 09 35
83/1A 00 00 27
83/1B 00 10 89
84/3 00 01 79
84/2 00 13 25
84/1B 00 09 67
84/1A 00 00 12
कामावरपुकोटा मंके नापल्लि 48\2 00 05 57
48\6 00 03 90
48\3 00 01 36
48\4 00 00 37
48\5 00 05 19
47\5 00 07 95
47\4 00 07 93
50\2 00 11 02
50\1 00 19 36
नाला(51\12) 00 01 14
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5927
51\11 00 01 3851\9 00 03 64
51\10 00 08 87
29\4 00 11 02
29\5 00 00 77
28\4 00 09 70
28\5 00 04 42
28\6 00 06 88
27\3 00 06 34
27\2 00 06 81
26\3 00 08 48
26\2 00 16 56
रास्ता (55) 00 02 70
148/1 00 16 94
143/3 00 22 49
144 00 06 80
142 00 13 97
140/2 00 18 64
139/3 00 14 95
134/1 00 19 67
134/2 00 00 04
135 00 35 38
94 00 42 95
95/1 00 17 55
96 00 13 30
कामावरपुकोटा मैसन्नागूडेम 44/20 00 02 47
44/15 00 00 02
44/16 00 03 22
44/17 00 05 35
44/18 00 05 28
43/8 00 09 73
43/6 00 02 36
43/7A 00 08 26
43/7B 00 00 05
42/2A 00 00 08
5928 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
42/2B 00 06 67
42/2C 00 11 39
42/3 00 08 24
42/4 00 12 28
42/1 00 02 27
41/3 00 08 33
41/2C 00 01 78
41/2B 00 22 37
37 00 04 50
36 00 70 07
35/1 00 19 77
कामावरपुकोटा गुन्टुपल्लि 369/4 00 00 49
365/1 00 25 12
365/2 00 02 91
360/5 00 04 09
360/4 00 11 82
360/2 00 00 21
360/3 00 18 72
360/1 00 02 15
366/1 00 14 58
347/2 00 01 53
359/3 00 16 67
358/1 00 15 20
358/2 00 11 32
358/4 00 06 49
328/3 00 09 34
328/4 00 07 56
328/5 00 04 98
330/5 00 20 04
330/6 00 01 76
330/4 00 15 50
330/2 00 06 27
330/3 00 04 48
नाला (337 ) 00 02 63
336/3 00 06 93
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5929
336/4 00 05 35
334/7 00 03 03
335/2 00 10 06
335/3 00 10 89
335/4 00 10 80
335/1 00 00 77
304/4 00 00 65
304/3 00 01 46
304/1 00 12 72
304/2 00 00 82
305/2 00 04 33
305/7 00 10 75
नाला(305/6) 00 02 11
305/5 00 03 65
305/4 00 10 71
302/2 00 00 73
रास्ता (305/3) 00 01 07
रास्ता (302/1) 00 03 01
85 00 19 68
86/3 00 24 36
86/4 00 09 09
163 00 00 89
162 00 33 88
160/3 00 07 62
160/2 00 04 37
160/1 00 05 37
161/1 00 24 15
158/2 00 25 37
158/3 00 04 04
156/2 00 16 63
रास्ता (154) 00 04 28
122/4 00 21 83
122/1 00 02 65
121/2 00 23 06
121/3 00 03 10
5930 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
121/4 00 00 20
123/2 00 06 15
123/1 00 02 67
119/2 00 14 63
119/1 00 19 83
117/7 00 01 28
117/6 00 01 02
117/5 00 01 43
117/4 00 03 46
117/3 00 05 53
117/1 00 01 16
116/2 00 31 42
113/1 00 01 17
113/2 00 16 47
112/3 00 16 20
कmा रास्ता (112/1) 00 01 53
कामावरपुकोटा राजुनागुलापल्लि 132\1 00 13 55
132\2 00 13 07
129 00 10 36
116\2 00 11 80
116\3 00 13 76
115\2A 00 18 43
115\2B 00 02 44
110\2D 00 07 55
113 00 03 15
112\2 00 13 18
112\3 00 00 23
112\1A 00 06 78
106 00 31 50
65 00 20 70
32\9B 00 09 04
32\10 00 09 09
32\11 00 02 86
35\4 00 25 01
35\2C 00 10 03
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5931
35\2B 00 01 16 34\1 00 12 84 36\2 00 02 17 रास्ता (36\1) 00 01 25
[फा. सं. आर-25011/32/2017-ओआर-I ]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2028.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government, that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products in the state of Andhra Pradesh a pipeline should be laid for implementing Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project under Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person who is interested in the land described in the said schedule, may submit objection in writing to Shri. K.A.S Jennyson, Competent Authority (Andhra Pradesh), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Pipelines Division), Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project, Plot No. 33, Kanaka Durga officer's Colony ,Gurunank Nagar Main Road , Vijayawada -520008 within twenty one (21) days from the date on which the copies of this notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India, are made available to the general public.
SCHEDULE
| District : West | Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | |||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.m | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Chintalapudi Pragadavaram ROAD(1007) 00 13 53
1279/6 00 00 09
1279/5 00 12 66
1279/4 00 05 62
1279/3 00 06 34
1279/2 00 05 46
1279/1 00 02 78
1278/2 00 05 05
1278/1 00 08 48
1000/13 00 00 38
1278/3 00 00 79
1000/12 00 04 33
1000/11 00 03 93
1000/10 00 02 91
5932 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1277/3 00 23 80 1277/1 00 23 62 1276 00 31 07 991/2 00 01 41 991/1E 00 21 21 991/1A 00 17 62 990/9 00 01 91 990/1 00 10 04 990/2 00 13 62 987\1 00 12 19 988 00 05 91 1167/5 00 03 04 1167/3 00 27 10 1167/2 00 07 92 1168/1 00 01 71 1165/3 00 10 18 1166/1 00 23 67 720 00 08 04 724 00 09 94 722 00 68 11 1151/1 00 10 68 1151/6 00 03 58 1151/5 00 17 25 1150/12 00 00 07 1150/4 00 19 12 1150/7 00 07 06 1150/6 00 06 58 1150/2 00 08 44 1145/3 00 11 99 1145/2 00 08 18 1145/4 00 07 44 1145/1 00 08 27 1144/21 00 00 23 1144/20 00 05 52 1144/17 00 00 48 1144/18 00 09 47 1143/4 00 16 32 1142/3 00 14 10 1142/1 00 12 76 671\2 00 34 25 670A 00 14 76[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5933
601/4E 00 01 39
601/4C 00 00 22
601/3 00 00 63
602/2 00 00 61
602/1C 00 17 38
602/1B 00 02 21
602/1A 00 14 95
603/5 00 06 87
603/4 00 12 77
KATCHA
RASTA(603/2) 00 03 12
606/2 00 24 86
606/1B 00 07 72
606/1A 00 06 19
605/2 00 07 84
605/1 00 05 09
575/3A 00 00 06
575/2A 00 28 21
574/3 00 04 22
574/2 00 17 05
532\2 00 18 13
532\1 00 11 56
533/1 00 27 54
556 00 25 37
555 00 34 00
557 00 22 94
235/1B 00 17 35
235/1A 00 03 64
247/2 00 04 10
246/1 00 00 67
248/4 00 07 24
248/1 00 13 91
248/2 00 06 15
ROAD (252) 00 03 64
225/2 00 17 83
225/1 00 03 13
224/1 00 06 36
226 00 17 04
227 00 36 23
217/2B 00 06 29
217/2A 00 04 22
5934 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
217/1 00 13 56
210/6 00 16 46
210/5 00 19 26
210/7 00 00 13
211/2 00 00 55
216/2 00 12 86
216/1 00 10 83
214/5 00 05 75
214/4 00 04 79
214/3 00 05 15
214/2 00 05 23
214/1 00 16 59
138 00 31 23
163/3 00 00 17
163/5 00 17 76
163/4 00 20 34
162/3 00 09 27
162/2 00 08 62
162/1 00 09 47
157/5 00 01 20
157/2 00 04 43
159 00 25 91
SH - 43 (158/5) 00 04 42
158/4 00 14 46
158/3 00 09 37
6 00 28 27
2 02 30 92
KATCHA
Chintalapudi Venkampalem RASTA(93) 00 02 83
94/2 00 22 98
83/4 00 14 97
77/29 00 02 21
75/7A 00 12 08
75/6 00 02 44
75/7 00 10 53
75/3/B 00 02 59
75/3/A 00 02 79
75/2 00 00 44
75/4 00 00 86
77/16 00 02 94
77/15 00 02 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5935
76/5 00 00 20
77/14 00 04 82
77/13 00 07 27
76/4 00 00 99
77/12 00 05 77
77/11 00 04 23
77/10 00 03 75
Nala (61) 00 02 66
62/4/B 00 00 65
62/5/A 00 06 23
62/4/A 00 05 95
62/3 00 05 07
62/7 00 00 29
63/8/A 00 00 44
62/2 00 05 65
62/1 00 06 62
Nala (63/7) 00 01 66
63/6 00 00 54
63/5 00 05 00
63/4 00 03 71
63/3 00 04 99
63/1 00 14 62
55/3 00 08 31
54/2 00 41 91
54/1 00 00 38
53/1C 00 09 94
53/1B 00 03 06
Chintalapudi Talarlapalle 84/8 00 33 70
84/7 00 29 39
84/5 00 02 21
84/2 00 30 46
84/3 00 11 34
85 00 32 86
86 00 76 50
87/2 00 00 30
87/1 00 07 79
54 00 03 96
52 00 49 27
Nala 51/2 00 03 24
51/3B 00 06 20
51/3A 00 21 77
5936 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
50/1A 00 10 1246 00 02 70
44/2A 00 08 81
43/1A 00 47 43
40/1A 00 04 54
41 00 01 39
27/3 00 19 95
28/2B 00 02 16
28/2A 00 09 38
29/5 00 05 66
29/4 00 10 66
29/3 00 08 91
29/2 00 02 54
30/2 00 30 09
31/4 00 04 32
30/1 00 00 11
31/1 00 04 42
T Narasapuram Tedlam 103 00 43 17
102/1I 00 25 34
102/1K 00 08 84
102/1F 00 03 04
102/1E 00 09 24
102/1B 00 13 18
102/1A 00 05 28
102/1C 00 00 24
119/1 00 15 90
111/1 00 09 83
111/1B 00 14 10
111/1A 00 08 95
111/1C 00 02 37
112 00 10 40
113 00 12 84
114 00 19 66
T Narasapuram Lingraopalem 6 00 05 40
7/6 00 21 78
7/7 00 01 33
8/4 00 10 90
9/6 00 23 17
9/1 00 19 25
10 00 06 41
11/6 00 02 92
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5937
11/5 00 10 31
11/3 00 10 80
11/2 00 00 53
T Narasapuram Sriramavaram 187/5 00 42 85
189/1 00 03 40
189/4 00 04 03
189/3 00 01 36
201/4 00 12 65
201/3 00 06 55
201/2 00 00 63
200/3 00 09 77
200/1 00 06 91
199/2 00 05 88
199/1 00 03 50
193/11 00 15 30
193/10 00 25 46
193/4 00 06 88
193/5 00 06 88
193/3 00 26 41
T Narasapuram Krishnaraopalem 4 00 51 45
3 00 67 81
2 00 48 97
10/3 00 03 32
10/2 00 18 96
Dwaraka Tirumala I.S.Raghavapuram 481\1A 00 16 20
480\1 00 38 58
476\6A 00 10 41
476\2 00 09 08
476\1 00 04 74
474\4 00 02 82
474\3 00 24 90
474\1 00 05 22
473 00 15 95
459\4 00 20 22
459\3 00 11 23
459\2 00 06 00
459\1 00 16 25
458\2 00 09 32
458\3 00 02 84
458\1 00 10 35
451\2 00 32 22
5938 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
444 00 06 49
445\2 00 03 41
445\1 00 07 34
443\2 00 23 74
438/2A 00 26 31
KATCHA
RASTA(437) 00 01 42
435\2B 00 00 71
435\2A 00 57 98
432\1 00 28 66
431 00 14 20
KATCHA
RASTA(430) 00 04 39
205 00 03 48
209/1 00 99 63
208/1B 00 00 81
210\2 00 08 98
203 00 00 44
210\1 00 00 22
196/1 00 05 28
CANAL(196/2) 00 07 70
196/3A 00 37 08
KATCHA
RASTA(194) 00 08 22
181 00 57 86
182 00 39 72
183 00 56 23
144/2 00 00 17
134 00 64 05
133 00 54 79
123/1 00 23 88
121/3 00 00 03
123/2 00 02 25
121/4 00 11 22
120 00 03 00
Dwaraka Tirumala G.Kottepalli 10/2L2 00 04 72
10/2C 00 00 25
Devarapalli Yadavolu 118-6C 00 04 99
118-2B 00 00 12
255/1D 00 02 03
Gopalapuram Vadlagunta 12 00 61 17
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5939
Vellachintalagudem 590-2D 00 05 61
Koyyalagudem Kankadripuram 96 00 42 79
Rajavaram 483/2 00 39 33
214 00 53 65
Tallapudi Tupakulagudem 163 00 35 69
175 00 74 59
223 00 02 21
Annadevarapeta 288/2C 00 20 63
351 00 32 10
Kamavarapukota Yadavalli ROAD(120) 00 02 38
121/1E 00 08 19
121/1B 00 02 48
121/1A 00 05 45
121/2 00 19 47
127 00 03 42
128/9 00 11 49
128/8 00 07 44
130 00 02 00
132/2 00 22 85
97/2 00 22 46
98 00 28 39
79 00 22 05
78 00 25 64
77/7 00 11 21
77/6 00 01 29
77/5 00 02 88
77/4 00 06 23
77/2 00 07 55
82/2 00 30 68
ROAD(82/3) 00 04 25
49 00 10 28
83/1 00 00 33
46/1 00 16 72
48/3 00 27 33
43 00 02 86
42 00 01 18
41 00 50 31
ROAD(40) 00 04 70
184/1 00 21 80
185/5 00 07 80
5940 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
185/4 00 06 97
185/3 00 06 98
185/2 00 06 69
185/1 00 08 66
186/2 00 10 27
186/3 00 14 19
KATCHA
RASTA(186/1) 00 02 30
192 00 41 35
193 00 02 10
Kamavarapukota Ramannapalem 57 00 45 46
58/1 00 00 19
61/2 00 17 15
61/1 00 16 66
64/2 00 40 12
66/5 00 01 30
66/4 00 09 13
66/3 00 02 95
66/2 00 04 49
66/1 00 04 15
67 00 19 06
75/4 00 18 90
76/4 00 13 13
76/3 00 11 18
13/1 00 10 68
13/2 00 37 27
11/3 00 00 18
11/2 00 15 12
16/3 00 11 16
16/1 00 09 56
18/7 00 04 72
18/6 00 03 99
18/5 00 04 42
18/4 00 11 65
18/3 00 03 68
18/2 00 03 74
18/1 00 01 35
20/2 00 00 13
20/1 00 00 17
19/4/B 00 07 73
19/4/A 00 03 66
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5941
19/3 00 12 60
KATCHA
RASTA(19/2) 00 01 45
Kamavarapukota Kamavarapukota 654 00 00 90
653/7 00 11 21
653/1 00 19 68
SH - 44 (652) 00 04 67
658/2 00 19 71
657/2 00 00 78
659 00 33 72
KATCHA
RASTA(660) 00 05 12
661/4 00 08 37
661/3 00 00 01
661/2 00 11 34
664/4 00 07 26
664/3 00 07 02
664/2 00 07 52
664/1 00 09 65
KATCHA
RASTA(671) 00 01 53
667/7 00 28 32
630 00 19 29
KATCHA
RASTA(629) 00 01 92
628/1 00 21 75
628/2 00 23 27
627/4 00 00 51
627/3 00 20 40
KATCHA
RASTA(627/6) 00 01 27
625/2 00 17 77
625/1 00 17 51
624/1 00 21 30
KATCHA
RASTA(623) 00 04 21
597/2 00 46 91
595/3 00 11 41
595/4 00 09 44
595/1 00 02 39
594/4 00 05 04
594/3 00 00 17
582 00 07 11
5942 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
583/1 00 31 85Nala 583/2 00 01 60
584 00 08 33
574/1 00 03 20
574/2 00 08 85
52 00 04 34
51/1B 00 00 17
51/3 00 19 06
531/1 00 14 10
531/5 00 02 14
50/2 00 00 08
49/1 00 06 56
49/2 00 26 60
48 00 02 78
47/2 00 27 94
64 00 02 11
47/2 00 27 94
64 00 02 11
65/2 00 11 88
65/1 00 29 91
76/2 00 07 83
76/1 00 09 42
75/9 00 03 90
75/10 00 03 63
75/7 00 07 98
75/6 00 02 23
KATCHA
RASTA(79) 00 03 50
92/2A 00 00 28
92/1A 00 08 13
92/1B 00 08 56
92/1C 00 00 48
82/3 00 06 46
82/2 00 03 44
82/1 00 24 54
83/2 00 09 35
83/1A 00 00 27
83/1B 00 10 89
84/3 00 01 79
84/2 00 13 25
84/1B 00 09 67
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5943
84/1A 00 00 12
Kamavarapukota Mankenapalle 48\2 00 05 57
48\6 00 03 90
48\3 00 01 36
48\4 00 00 37
48\5 00 05 19
47\5 00 07 95
47\4 00 07 93
50\2 00 11 02
50\1 00 19 36
Nala 51\12 00 01 14
51\11 00 01 38
51\9 00 03 64
51\10 00 08 87
29\4 00 11 02
29\5 00 00 77
28\4 00 09 70
28\5 00 04 42
28\6 00 06 88
27\3 00 06 34
27\2 00 06 81
26\3 00 08 48
26\2 00 16 56
Road ( 55 ) 00 02 70
148/1 00 16 94
143/3 00 22 49
144 00 06 80
142 00 13 97
140/2 00 18 64
139/3 00 14 95
134/1 00 19 67
134/2 00 00 04
135 00 35 38
94 00 42 95
95/1 00 17 55
96 00 13 30
Kamavarapukota Maisannagudem 44/20 00 02 47
44/15 00 00 02
44/16 00 03 22
44/17 00 05 35
44/18 00 05 28
5944 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
43/8 00 09 73
43/6 00 02 36
43/7A 00 08 26
43/7B 00 00 05
42/2A 00 00 08
42/2B 00 06 67
42/2C 00 11 39
42/3 00 08 24
42/4 00 12 28
42/1 00 02 27
41/3 00 08 33
41/2C 00 01 78
41/2B 00 22 37
37 00 04 50
36 00 70 07
35/1 00 19 77
Kamavarapukota Guntupalle 369/4 00 00 49
365/1 00 25 12
365/2 00 02 91
360/5 00 04 09
360/4 00 11 82
360/2 00 00 21
360/3 00 18 72
360/1 00 02 15
366/1 00 14 58
347/2 00 01 53
359/3 00 16 67
358/1 00 15 20
358/2 00 11 32
358/4 00 06 49
328/3 00 09 34
328/4 00 07 56
328/5 00 04 98
330/5 00 20 04
330/6 00 01 76
330/4 00 15 50
330/2 00 06 27
330/3 00 04 48
Nala (337 ) 00 02 63
336/3 00 06 93
336/4 00 05 35
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5945
334/7 00 03 03
335/2 00 10 06
335/3 00 10 89
335/4 00 10 80
335/1 00 00 77
304/4 00 00 65
304/3 00 01 46
304/1 00 12 72
304/2 00 00 82
305/2 00 04 33
305/7 00 10 75
Nala 305/6 00 02 11
305/5 00 03 65
305/4 00 10 71
302/2 00 00 73
ROAD(305/3) 00 01 07
ROAD(302/1) 00 03 01
85 00 19 68
86/3 00 24 36
86/4 00 09 09
163 00 00 89
162 00 33 88
160/3 00 07 62
160/2 00 04 37
160/1 00 05 37
161/1 00 24 15
158/2 00 25 37
158/3 00 04 04
156/2 00 16 63
RASTA(154) 00 04 28
122/4 00 21 83
122/1 00 02 65
121/2 00 23 06
121/3 00 03 10
121/4 00 00 20
123/2 00 06 15
123/1 00 02 67
119/2 00 14 63
5946 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
119/1 00 19 83
117/7 00 01 28
117/6 00 01 02
117/5 00 01 43
117/4 00 03 46
117/3 00 05 53
117/1 00 01 16
116/2 00 31 42
113/1 00 01 17
113/2 00 16 47
112/3 00 16 20
KATCHA
RASTA(112/1) 00 01 53
Kamavarapukota Rajunagulapalle 132\1 00 13 55
132\2 00 13 07
129 00 10 36
116\2 00 11 80
116\3 00 13 76
115\2A 00 18 43
115\2B 00 02 44
110\2D 00 07 55
113 00 03 15
112\2 00 13 18
112\3 00 00 23
112\1A 00 06 78
106 00 31 50
65 00 20 70
32\9B 00 09 04
32\10 00 09 09
32\11 00 02 86
35\4 00 25 01
35\2C 00 10 03
35\2B 00 01 16
34\1 00 12 84
36\2 00 02 17
Road (36\1) 00 01 25
[F. No. R-25011/32/2017-OR-I]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5947श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2029.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंध्क,
ऑर्डनेन्स पैफक्ट्री, इटारसी एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक
विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 183/99द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो
केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26.07.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/99/98-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2029.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 183/99) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Itarsi and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 26.07.2017.
[No. L-14012/99/98-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/183/99
Shri M.G.Naik, Mullakkal Niwas, Near Police Chowky, Diversion Road, Itarsi
…Workman
Versus
General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Itarsi
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 12th day of June, 2017
1. As per letter dated 26-4-99 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 14012/99/98/IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Itarsi in terminating the services of Shri M.G. Naik is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Ist party submitted statement of claim at Pages 2/1 to 2/5. Case of workman is that industrial strike had taken place in 1991. The strike had continued for 46 days i.e. 4-4- 91 to 19-5-91. The strike was launched by employees of Ordnance Factory, Itarsi pursuing long demands and disharmonious relation between employees and management. Strike was neither induced nor provocated by any particular individual but it was a sudden outbreak of the aggrieved/ frustrated state of mind of the employees. On 3-5- 91, employees were not in receipt of their monetary salary for March 1991. Employee gathered at Admin Block to know reasons for non-disbursement of their monthly salary. All the employees gathered before Admin block asking General Manager to come before them and explain reasons for delay in disbursement of monthly salary. Employees were insisting assurance not to repeat such type of mistakes in future. That General Manager instead of coming down asked leaders of Union and associations to negotiate on such matter. One representative from each of the Union and Association came forward to negotiate with General Manager. During negotiation, General Manager expressed that there was administrative mistake. He asked them not to fight for this type of small demand rather should fight for5948 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] systematic overtime which they could not get since last one year. That the Union Representative should insist for getting systematic overtime from Ordnance Factory Board. When the leaders saw the moral support of their General Manager for their agitation for restoration of systematic overtime resorting for the benefit of their employees. They decided not to attend their work after strike from 4-4-91. In capacity of the office bearer of the registered Union affiliated to INDWF and INTUC. The workman was present with the workers gathered in admin block since 3-4-91. All Presidents and General Secretary of Union and Association met together to think for the decision of the workers to start their agitation from 4-4-91. Workers were convinced not to go on strike before completion of legal formalities.
3. It is contented that the employees decided to start their agitation from 4-4-91 morning. On 4-4-91, without taking any support from Union and association started agitations. Union and Association only supported the employees in their agitation for which one Joint front was formed consisting of one office bearer from each Union and Association to avoid any mishappening and to negotiate with the management so that the strike was called off as early as possible. Agitation was started for demand of timely payment of monthly salary, grant of Tribal Area Allowance, Restoration of systematic overtime as per the sister factories and payment of over stay in connection with the Factory Act. That Ist party was suspended on 13-4-91 by General Manager. Copy of chargesheet was also served on him in order to divert attention of striking employees regarding their original demands. Management failed to provide services of Defence Assistant to the workman despite applications dated 24-2-92. Workman was not provided services of Defence Assistant selected by him. He was given reasonable opportunity provided under Article 311 of the constitution. That charges were framed against him without conducting preliminary enquiry, without recording statements of witnesses of prosecution. The charges were based only on reports collected by Security Personnel. All witnesses of prosecution were the security persons working under the management. Any of the striking employees were not produced as witnesses of the management. The charges alleged against workman pertain to initiating striking employees to resort and participated in strike. Workman had produced his defence witnesses and defence of his brief. Enquiry Officer submitted his report on 24-11-92. Charge No. 8, 9, 11 & 13 were held not proved. Copy of the Enquiry Report was served on him on 16-12-92. Workman submitted his explanation to the Enquiry Report on 2-2-93. Meantime order of his suspension was revoked on 30-10-92. The Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment of compulsory retirement w.e.f. 28-5-93. Workman had preferred appeal against order of punishment. Without giving opportunity of personal hearing, appeal was rejected. Ist party workman reiterates that the order of compulsory retirement is illegal. Workman claimed to be innocent. The punishment of compulsory retirement is harsh. On such ground, Ist party workman prays for setting aside order of compulsory retirement.
4. 2nd party filed Written Statement at Pages 9/3 to 9/15 opposing claim of workman. 2nd party submits that services of Ist party were not terminated. Enquiry under Rule 14 CCS CCA Rules 1965 was conducted before imposing punishment of compulsory retirement. That workman was working as Fitter higher Grade in Ordnance Factory, Itarsi. During April May 1991, he actively participated in illegal strike organized by employees. Workman addressed the employees calling upon them to resort to illegal strike. Instigated the employees to continue the strike asked them not to report on shift duties, delivered inflammatory, provocative and slanderous speech while addressing unauthorized meetings on different occasions during the period 3-4-91 to 3-5-91. Unauthorized procession were organized in estate and organized unauthorized meetings at Main gate as well as in the residential areas on different occasions during the above period. Workman was placed under suspension on 13-4-91 for participating in unlawful activities. That consequent to Rule 7(ii) of CCS Rule 1964, it is provided no Government servant shall resort to or in any way abet any form of strike or coercion or physical duress in connection with any matter pertaining to his service or the service of any other Government Servant. Chargesheet was issued to workman on 4-7-91. The charges alleged were workman organizing unauthorized assembly inside factory during working hours, instigating employees against management, instigating employees to go on strike, to boycott shift duty, actively participating in illegal strike, misguiding employees, organizing, leading and taking out unauthorized procession in the estate, violating estate discipline and breaking the law and order in the estate, delivering slanderous speeches, speaking ill of Ordnance Factory Board Officer, willfully disrupting defence production, conducting unauthorized meetings in the estate, habitual offence and conduct unbecoming of a Government Servant. Workman denied charges as per representation dated 15-7-91. As per order dated 24-7-91, enquiry was constituted to enquire into charges levelled against workman. Enquiry was conducted on various dates. As per the findings of Enquiry Officer, charge Nos. 1 to 7, 10, 12, 14 & 15 were established. Enquiry Report was forwarded to workman with letter dated 16-12-92. Workman submitted representation on 2-2-93. The Disciplinary Authority considered his representation with reference to all relevant documents pertaining to the case, inquiry report as well as proceedings of enquiry and evidence on record and held him guilty of charges framed against him. Punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed on 28-5-93. Appeal preferred by workman was rejected on 17-5-96. The review appeal filed by workman to Hon'ble President of India was rejected on 10-10-97. 2nd party reiterates that workman committed misconduct after getting it proved in Enquiry Proceedings, punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed against is proper and legal. 2nd party had denied all material contentions of workman regarding factual matrix. Workman could not bring the document in support of his contention about pending demands or harmonious relationship.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 59495. 2nd party further submits that salary for the month of March 1991 in Ordnance Factory, Itarsi was to be disbursed on 2-4-91- 1-4-91 being no public transaction day of the Bank. The Bank could provide the amount of salary only at about 16.30 hours on 2-4-91 but disbursement of salary at this late hours was found impossible as most of the employees left the factory after expiry of normal duty hours at 16.30 hours. Hence necessary arrangement was made to disburse the salary from 8 hours to 15.30 hours on the next day on 3-4-91. The workman had instigated employees to continue on strike. Production of Ordnance Factory Itarsi was totally sufferedfor 45 days. On 3-4-91, workman was suspended . Kulkarni was provided as Defence Assistant to workman. Enquiry was conducted properly. Charges framed against workman. On report of gate meetings collected by Security Personnel, no pre-enquiry was conducted. Appellant not made out specific request for personal hearing. 2nd party management submits if enquiry is found vitiated, management be given liberty to lead evidence to prove misconduct. That the punishment imposed against workman is legal.
6. As per order dated 12-2-16, enquiry conducted against workman is found legal and proper.
7. Considering pleadings on record and findings on enquiry, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under. My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-
| (i) Whether the charges alleged against workman is proved from evidence in Enquiry proceedings? | Except charge No. 8,9,11 & 13, rest all charges are proved against workman. |
| (ii) Whether the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed against workman is proper and legal? | I n Affirmative |
| (iii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?" | Workman is not entitled to any relief. |
REASONS
8. Point No.- The term of reference pertains to legality of termination of services of Ist party workman. As per order dated 12-2-16, enquiry conducted against workman is found proper and legal. The chargesheet was issued to Ist party workman pertaining to 15 charges relating to organizing unauthorized assembly inside factory during working hours, instigating employees against management, instigating employees to go on strike, to boycott shift duty, actively participating in illegal strike, misguiding employees, organizing, leading and taking out unauthorized procession in the estate, violating estate discipline and breaking the law and order in the estate, delivering slanderous speeches, speaking ill of Ordnance Factory Board Officer, willfully disrupting defence production, conducting unauthorized meetings in the estate, habitual offence and conduct unbecoming of a Government Servant. Enquiry Officer in his report held that Charge Nos. 8, 9, 11 & 13 are not established. Question remains for consideration is whether rest of the charges are established from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings.
9. Learned counsel for workman Shri Pravin Yadav drawn my attention to statements of management's witnesses Nos. 1 to 8 in their cross-examination pointing the inconsistency and probabilities in the evidence of management's witnesses. My attention was also pointed out to statements of defence witnesses and evidence in their cross- examination. Legal position is rather settled that while exercising powers of jurisdiction, review under Section 11-A of ID Act, evidence cannot be re-appreciated.
10. The matter pertains to legality of punishment of compulsory retirement imposed against workman and not legality of the termination of workman. Punishment was imposed after issuing chargesheet and conducting enquiry. Enquiry Officer submitted his Enquiry Report holding workman guilty of the charges except Charge Nos. 8, 9, 11 & 13. Enquiry Report is produced at Exhibit M-5. Enquiry Officer has separately discussed the evidence dealing with each of the charges. Evidence of management's witness No.1 Dhiraj Kumar is devoted on the point on 5-4-91, gate meeting was organized. Such gate meeting was organized at Union outside main gate. Said meeting was arranged by workman. As per the evidence of said witness, workman had asked employees to boycott shift duties. Workman had told boycotting of shift duty for essential duty. That employees should attend duties bearing black badge, gate meeting was also organized on 11-4-91. Workman had addressed said gage meeting. He had dealt with the point of overtime was not given, they will organize dharna at DGOF's office, Factory Board, Calcutta. The gate meeting was also organized on 12-4-91 was addressed by workman. Workman had also addressed that people staying at home should join strike. He had also addressed for procession of ladies to be taken. Gate meeting was also organized on 3-5-91. It was addressed by workman. During his address, workman said that Ordnance Factory Ambajali was allowing 48 hours overtime. In his cross, said witness of management re-affirms that he was on duty on 5-4-91. He did not remember his shift. He submitted report about meeting dated 5-4-91. The meeting was organized at approx. 00 meters distance. Said5950 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] meeting was organized after 4.30 pm. He attended said meeting. He was instructed by foreman to cover the meeting. There was no instructions in writing. Instructions were given orally. He did not sign the register for going out of the factory. He did not remember whether mike arrangement was made. He has not recorded statement of workman. The meeting was devoted on the point of over time issue. That he had heard Ordiance Factory Ambajali allowing 48 hours overtime. On 11-4-91, he was on duty. He did not remember his shift. Said meeting was held outside the maingate. In his cross-examination, witness says he did not know about ladies procession. His cross-examination shows that he had come on duty on 12-4-91. Gate meeting was started at 16.30 hours. Said meeting was held at Union platform outside the gate. Workman had claimed that their strike was legal. The witness in his cross-examination says he did not remember about unparliamentary language or remarks by workman. He attended duty on 3-5-9. Union had held meeting on that day. He attended said meeting along with B.K.Gupta and Joshi. Meeting was organized, he did not remember whether he received complaint from any employee of the factory orally or writing about workman stopping them to come inside the factory for duty.
11. Evidence of management's witness Shri P.L. Mathur is devoted on the point that he did not remember his shift on 3-4-91. That on 3-4-91, workman standing on group of atleast 30 employees saying that until when overtime was sanctioned by management, he will not move from his place. On that day, few people sent to meet General Manager but he did not remember name. After refreshing his statement, management's witness says that workman Naik spoke that Attendance of all such employees coming to the factory during stike period is being recorded by Security and the attendance will be regularized. That Naik addressed gate meeting dated 23-4-91. That workman had said Itarsi Band
was 100 % success. In his further evidence, witness No.2 says that the workman Naik said " ,
" Evidence in cross-examiantion shows that he was in Admin block on 3-4-91 at 11.30
AM., M.G. Naik workman went to meet General Manager. He did not remember whether Naik went to meet General Manager. In his further cross-examination that other Security Officer Deepak Gupta was assigned duty along with him for covering meeting dated 3-4-91. His further evidence shows that on 13-4-91, he did not attend duty. The meeting was held outside the factory at 16.30 hours, the meeting was held outside the main gate at Union Platform. He did not remember who recorded statement dated 13-4-91. That after refreshing his memory, witness said that statement recorded pertain to only Naik. Ist party workman also says he recorded statement. Workman saying "जो मजदूर छु (cid:3)ी पर
है, वो जल्दी (cid:8)ूटी पर आ जाओ"
12. Statement of management's witness No. 3 Shri Tikaram pertains to on 3-4-91, he was on duty, head of Security Section instructed him to have a round inside factory and industrial canteen. Around 9.45 pm, Mr. Naik came to canteen , he stood on bench announced that the staff is not getting the payment, if you all cooperate with me, I can get overtime allowance within 24 hours after decision with General Manager. While crossing store section about 30 to 40 workers followed him. That in industrial canteen , Naik addressed about 30-40 people who were taking tea break. In his cross, MW-3 Tikaram recognized workman Naik with his name. that he has recorded statement "आप सभी लोग एडिमन ब्लाक चलो, िमलकर GM साहब से बात करो" that Naik did not ask any employee by name to Admin Building. He was unable to tell whether workers have gathered in front of store section in industrial canteen. Head of the section had told him to record statement on 3-4-91. He was unable to tell names of persons who followed M.G.Naik. that M.G. Naik did not use abusive language or slogans. Management's witness A.V.Joshi in his evidence says that he had recorded statement on 30-4-91. The meeting was held at Union platform on 13-4-91. Shri M.G. Naik spoke such employee who are on duty shall receive payment. Employees who are on leave or medically unfit should try to come for duty as early as possible. He also recorded statement covering meeting dated 15-4-91. Naik(workman) had addressed said meeting. It is a joint report recorded on 15-4-91. Mr. Naik spoken on overtime issue- "हम ओवरटाइम लेकर रहेंगे" In his cross-examination, Shri A.V. Joshi witness No.4 was unable to tell who was addressing him to cover
meeting dated 5-4-9. He had recorded meeting work. He did not remember his working hours on 13-4-91, 26-4-9. He agreed that those meetings were held after working hours. He was unable to identify names of workers standing on Union platform shouting slogans. The statements of management witness No.4 says that he was not given written instructions during strike period. He did not remember in which shift he was working on 13-4-91, 15-4-91, 26-4-91. He did not remember whether he was on duty on 29-4-91. He did not remember on which topic Naik workman given speech on 3-5-91.
13. Evidence of management's witness No.5 Prem Kumar is devoted about meeting dated 12-4-91, 15-4-91. The report of those meetings were written by him. His further statement shows that some officers Foreman, other persons from essential services attended state meeting. He confirmed contents of reports dated 11-4-91, 12-4-91, 15-4-91. He did not remember how many persons were addressed in meeting dated 11-4-91. That he was not close to M.G.Naik workman through out the procession dated 12-4-91. In reply to Q.13, witness says only Electrical and Water supplies went to their respective units, others did not go. Gate meeting dated 26-4-91 was held after shift hours.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 595114. Management's witness No.6 and other witnesses also corroborated evidence that workman had addressed to the meeting dated 11-4-91 and other meetings. Only meeting dated 23-4-91 Naik had spoken witnesses were unable to tell the topic of the speech. All 5 Defence witnesses examined in defence enquiry tried to support the defence of workman. I am not inclined to discuss their evidence in detail as evidence of management's witnesses about gate meeting and slogans, procession supports the findings of Enquiry Officer. Evidence cannot be re-appreciated.
15. Learned counsel for 2nd party Shri A.K. Shashi emphasised that the strike was illegal. However any documents declaring the strike illegal has not been produced. At the same time, Ist party also not pleaded that the strike was resorted after giving notice of 14 days contemplated under Section 22 of ID Act. The strike has not been declared illegal under Section 24 of the ID Act. The pleadings of the parties are silent whether the strike was declared illegal. Chargesheet has been issued to workman under Rule 14 CCS CCA Rules alleging the misconduct. Evidence adduced by management in Enquiry Proceedings supports findings of Enquiry Officer that Charge Nos. 1 to 8, 0, 3 are not established. Rest of the charges are proved against workman. I donot find any reason to interfere in the findings recorded by Enquiry Officer considering the evidence dealing with each of the charge.
16. Learned counsel for 2nd party Shri A.K. Shashi relies on ratio held in case between
State Bank of India versus Ramesh Dinkar Punde reported in 2006(7)SCC-212. Their Lordship held with reappreciation of evidence by High Court impermissible.
Further reliance is placed on ratio held in case between West Bokaro Colliery versus Ram Pravesh Singh reported in 2009-I-LLJ-220(SC). Their Lordship dealing with Section 11-A of ID Act held standard of proof in departmental proceeding is different from that in criminal case. That standard of proof in departmental proceeding was preponderance of probabilities and the Tribunal had set aside the dismissal by observing that the charges against respondent were not proved beyond reasonable doubt, erroneously applying the yardstick of criminal proceedings.
Reliance is placed in case between R.S. Saini versus State of Punjab and others reported in 1999(8)SCC-90. Their Lordship dealing with scope of judicial review, limited scope. Held if there is some evidence to reasonably support finding of inquiring authority, the court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction would not reverse the finding on the ground of insufficiency of evidence.
Considering ratio held in above cases and evidence in Enquiry proceedings, I record my finding in Point No.1 that except charge Nos. 8, 9, 11 & 13, rest all charges are proved against workman.
17. Point No.2- In view of my finding in Point No.1 that except charge Nos. 8, 9, 11 & 13, all charges are proved against workman, punishment of compulsory retirement imposed against him, question remains for consideration is whether punishment is legal and proper. On the point Shri A.K.Shashi counsel for 2nd party relies on ratio held in case between-
Cement Corporation of India versus State of HP and others reported in 1995-II-LLJ-987. Their Lordship held workmen are entitled to agitate against financial irregularities committed by the management. However they are not entitled to close the factory by illegally blowing the siren, creating a violent mob ad engage in a wide spread physical assault of almost all officers. There can be no other misconduct more serious than the one in the present case. There is no other proper and justified misconduct deserving the extreme penalty of punishment. The judgment of Labour Court holding dismissal is not illegal cannot be characterized as extreme or harsh.
Reliance is also placed in case between New Sherrock Mills and Maheshbhai T. Rao reported in 1997-I-LLJ- 121. The ratio held in the case pertains to badly workman entering office of the Deputy Manager and threatening that the Mill Officers will not be safe outside the mill. Labour Court exfinancial irregularities committed by the management. However they are not entitled to close the factory by illegally blowing the siren, creating a violent mob ad engage in a wide spread physical assault of almost all officers. There can be no other misconduct more serious than the one in the present case. There is no other proper and justified misconduct deserving the extreme penalty of punishment. The judgment of Labour Court holding dismissal is not illegal cannot be characterized as extreme or harsh.
Reliance is also placed in case between New Sherrock Mills and Maheshbhai T.Rao reported in 1997-I-LLJ- 121. The ratio held in the case pertains to badly workman entering office of the Deputy Manager and threatening that the Mill Officers will not be safe outside the mill. Labour Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 78 directing reinstatement of workman with forty percent backwages. The domestic enquiry was found proper and legal. Order of discharge was not by way of victimization and the workman was guilty of serious misconduct. It was held that punishment awarded by management was shockingly disproportionate.
In present case, the evidence on record shows that production of the factory was affected for about 45 days. The strike was resorted by employees, gate meetings and assemblies were organized by Ist party workman. The5952 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] punishment imposed on workman cannot be said shockingly disproportionate. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.1 that workman is not entitled to any relief.
18. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Itarsi in terminating the services of Shri M.G.Naik is legal and justified.
(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2030.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्ीक्षक, डाकघर, शहडोल विभाग, शहडोल एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 11/96द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 26.07.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/184/94-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2030.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 11/96) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Suprintendent, Post Office, Shahdol Division, Shahdol and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 26.07.2017.
[No. L-40012/184/94-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/11/96
Shri S.P.Namdeo,
Village Lakhora (Rajendragram),
Distt. Shahdol (MP)
…Workman Versus
Superintendent, Post Office, Shahdol Division, Shahdol
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 25th day of May 2017
1. As per letter dated 27-12-95 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 40012/184/94-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the Supdt. Of Post Offices, Shahdol Division, Shahdol in removing Shri Saraswati Prasad Namdeo, Extra Departmental, Branch Dakpal, Vill. Lakhora (Rajendragram), Distt. Shahdol from services w.e.f. 18-6-92 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman submitted statement of claim at Page 3/1 to 3/3. Case of workman is that he was employed on 17-10-75 as Extra Departmental Dakpal in Village Lakhora, District Shahdol by Superintendent of Post Office, Shahdol. Chargesheet was issued to him making certain allegations[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5953 as per letter dated 24-4-91 that enquiry was conducted against him. Enquiry Officer held him guilty of charges alleged. Disciplinary Authority Superintendent Post Office, Shahdol accepted report of Enquiry Officer and imposed penalty of removal from service. Appeal preferred by workman challenging his removal was dismissed as per order dated 21-12- 92. Workman contented that the enquiry was conducted against him in bias mind. Dismissal of workman is malafide. In that regard, workman submits that allegations were made that workman used to come on duty in intoxicated condition. Enquiry Officer accepted it as truth. Earlier the workman was not served any chargesheet. There was no evidence before Enquiry Officer about workman received amount, any complaint was not submitted against workman. Enquiry Officer relied about statement of prosecution witnesses obtained through preliminary enquiry. It is reiterated that enquiry was not conducted according to rules. Punishment of removal from service is harsh and excessive as such illegal. On such contentions, workman prayed for his reinstatement with backwages.
3. 2nd party management filed Written Statement at Page 5/1 to 5/3 opposing claim of workman. 2nd party has pleaded that workman was engaged as Extra Departmental Dakpal Branch Lakhora, Distt. Shahdol on 7-10-75. Workman was in habit of committing violations of post of telephone regulations. Workman was put up duty in the period 18-10-86 to 7-2-88. Workman was issued warning on 4-1-90 for serious lapse of misappropriation. 2nd party submits that Enquiry Officer was appointed for enquiry in respect of chargesheet dated 24-4-91 enquiry was conducted following procedure under Rule-14 of CCS CCA Rules 1965. Principles of natural justice were followed. Enquiry Report was supplied to workman on 20-4-92. Considering report of Enquiry Officer, Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment of removal from service. The appeal preferred by workman challenged order of his dismissal was dismissed on 21-12-92. 2nd party further contends that if enquiry is found vitiated, it may be permitted to prove misconduct adducing evidence. Management prayed for rejection of claim.
4. As per order dated 10-5-16, enquiry conducted against workman is found vitiated. Management was permitted to prove misconduct in Court.
5. Considering pleadings on record and findings on enquiry, the points which arise for my consideration and determination are as under. My findings are recorded against each of them for the reasons as below:-
| (i) Whether the management proves misconduct alleged in chargesheet dated 24-4-91? | In Negative |
| (ii) Whether the punishment of removal imposed against workman is proper and legal? | In Negative |
| (iii) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?" | As per final order. |
REASONS
6. Point No.1,2: Chargesheet was issued to workman Exhibit M-1 pertains to workman had shown less amount of Rs.277.30 on 31-3-91, workman had not followed Rule 177(3,4). Workman remained absent on 21-1-90, 13-2-90 etc. that amount of Rs.511, 40, 320- total Rs.872.50 was not accounted on verification. The amount of various money orders were not accounted. As per order dated 11-5-16, enquiry conducted against workman is found vitiated. Though management was granted permission to prove misconduct by adducing evidence, case was adjourned several times but management not filed any evidence. As such charges/ misconduct alleged against workman is not proved by management. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.1.
7. Point No.2- The charges/ misconduct alleged against workman are not proved, consequently punishment of removal imposed against workman seems to be improper and illegal. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.2.
8. Point No.3- In view of my finding in Point No.1 charges are not proved, Point No.2 punishment of removal imposed against workman is not proper and legal, during pendency of the reference died, his LRs are not brought on record, as per Section 10(8) of I.D.Act, the reference doesnot abate by death and reference requires to be decided. As punishment of removal is not legal, workman deserves to be reinstated and consequential benefits be paid till his death. Accordingly I record my finding in Point No.3.
9. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action Supdt. Of Post Offices, Shahdol Division, Shahdol in removing Shri Saraswati Prasad Namdeo, Extra Departmental, Branch Dakpal, Vill. Lakhora (Rajendragram), Distt. Shahdol from services w.e.f. 18-6-92 is not legal and proper.
5954 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](2) The order of removal of workman dated 18-6-92 is quashed. 2nd party management is directed to give benefit of deemed reinstatement with full backwages till death of workman i.e. 8-12-2016.
Amount as per above order shall be paid to legal heirs of workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award. In case of default, amount shall carry 9 % interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.
R. B. PATLE, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2031.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार रजिस्ट्रार,
इलाहाबाद विश्वविद्यालय, इलाहाबाद एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट
औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, कानपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 38/2016द्ध को प्रकाशित
करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 20.06.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/173/2015-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2031.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 38/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Registrar, Allahabad University, Allahabad and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 20.06.2017.
[No. L-42012/173/2015-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR
Industrial Dispute No. 38 of 2016
Between :
1. Sh. Kishan Prasad Dubey, S/o Girja Prasad Dubey
Village Bahtipur PO Thariyan Kala Distt. Faizabad, UP.
2. Sh. Suresh Chandra Shukla S/o SH. Babu Lal Shukla
Village Durga Ka Purwa, Sarai Gopal PO. Khemaipur, Kunda Distt. Pratapgarh, UP
3. Sh. Gyan Chandra Prajapati S/o Sadhu Lal Prajapati
Mohan Ganj PO. Gohri, Soraon. Distt. Allahabad U.P.
And
The Register, Allahabad University Allahabad.
AWARD
1. Central Government, MoL, New Delhi, vide notification no. L- 42012/173/2015-IR (DU) dated 20.10.2015, has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal.
2. (1)Whether the workmen as per annexure-1, can be said to be the workmen of Allahabad University (2) And if so whether the termination of services of the workmen as per annexure -1 is legal and Justified? (3) if not to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to and from which date?
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 59553. In Instant case after receipt of reference order, registered notices to the opposite parties were sent by the tribunal fixing 18.11.2016 as a date for filing the statement of claim and written statement by the opposite parties. On the date fixed on behalf of the Allahabad University one Sri V K Gupta filed his power in the case but none was present on behalf of the worker nor was any claim statement filed on his behalf in the case.
4. After availing sufficient opportunities worker failed to file his claim in the case which clearly indicate that the worker is not interested in prosecuting his case, therefore all opportunities available to him were closed by order of the tribunal dated 24.05.2017 and the case was reserved for award.
5. From the above facts and circumstances of the case, the reference is bound to be decided against the worker in the absence of pleadings and proof.
6. Accordingly the reference is decided against the worker and in favour of the management of Allahabad University.
SHUBHENDRA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2032.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रबंध्न, हदुस्तान एयरोनॉटिक्स लिमिटेड, क्यूबन रोड, बैंगलोर व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, बैंगलोर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 25/2012द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 14.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/02/2017-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2032.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 25/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bangalore as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Cubbon Road, Bangalore & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 14.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/02/2017-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
BANGALORE
DATED : 04th AUGUST, 2017
PRESENT : Shri V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer
C.R. No. 25/2012
I Party
II Party
Sh. A Lourdu Swamy, 1. The Management of
S/o Anthony, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited,
No. 616, 7th Cross, Represented by its Chairman
Ambedkarnagar, Koramangala, Cubbon Road,
Bangalore – 560047 Bangalore – 560001
2. The Managing Director,
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited,
Bangalore Complex, Vimanapura Post,
Bangalore – 560017
Advocates for I Party: Mr. Shivaraj B.K, Advocates for II Party:
Mr. Raghuram & Mr. A.J. Srinivasa Mr. T. Raja Ram & Mr. Goreppa
5956 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
1. The Central Government vide Order No.L-14012/02/2012-IR(DU) dated 07.08.2012 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 has made this reference for adjudication with following Schedule :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bangalore is justified in not
confirming the services of Shri A. Lourdu Swamy amongst 44 others term contact labour (i.e. Sh.
Gunashekar and 44 others) as per the settlement dated 22.06.2009 of the High Court decision. If not,
what relief the said workman is entitled to?"
2. The I Party submitted in the claim statement as follows:-
The I Party workmen state that they have joined the work in canteen of the Air Craft Division of the II Party on 16.02.1982. The I Party have been discharging their duties continuously to the full satisfaction of his superiors until they have been refused employment w.e.f. 10.01.2008. Therefore, the I Party workmen pray that, this Court may be pleased to answer the points of dispute in favour of the I Party workmen and direct the II Party to reinstate and regularize the I Party by confirming their service from the date when the co-workers have been regularized and confirmed and grant all other consequential benefits of reinstatement and regularization including full back wages, continuity of service etc., in the interest of justice and equity.
3. However, in the Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9332-9333/2010, dated 26.02.2016, in the case of Nashik workers Union Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, it is clearly held as follows:- "As we have set aside the order passed in L.P.A. No. 84 of 2006 and opined that the 'appropriate Government' in relation to the respondent company (HAL) is the State Government, the matter has to be remitted to the High Court for fresh adjudication on merits."
4. In the above mentioned facts and circumstances, an important and preliminary point arises for consideration, with regard to the above mentioned matter as follows:- "Whether this Court lacks jurisdiction to try the present Matter?"
5. POINT :- In the present case, the I Party has prayed to direct the II Party/HAL Management to reinstate and regularise the I Party by confirming their services from the date when their co-workers have been regularized and confirmed and grant all other consequential benefits of reinstatement and regularisation including full back wages, continuity of service, etc., in the interest of justice. Hence, it is crystal clear that as per the above mentioned judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, this Court lacks jurisdiction to try the present matter.
6. Further, taking into consideration the above mentioned points and principles as laid down by the Lordships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, this Court has no other alternative, except to follow the said judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. In fact, the I Party has also not disputed the said details. At the same time, this Court is not expressing any opinion on other issues raised by both the sides, as this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the present matter of this nature and also liberty is granted to the I Party to raise the dispute before the proper, competent and appropriate Judicial Forum/Tribunal/Court within 30 days from the date of receipt of the present Award passed by this Court, in the best interest of justice, equity and fair play. Accordingly, this point is answered. Hence, the following Award is passed:-
AWARD
This Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute raised by the I party, particularly, in the light of the above mentioned judgement passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 9332-9333/2010, dated 26.02.2016, in the case of Nashik workers Union Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and the present matter suffers for want of jurisdiction before this Court and liberty is given to the I party to raise the dispute before the proper, competent and appropriate Judicial Forum/ Tribunal/Court, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the present Award, by adopting the procedure known under the law, in the best interest of justice, equity, good conscience and fair play and this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the various other issues raised by both the parties, as the present matter has been disposed of, on the limited ground of jurisdiction point alone, and also, without costs, for the above mentioned facts and circumstances.
(Dictated, transcribed, corrected and signed by me on 4th August, 2017)
V. S. RAVI, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5957
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2033.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एस
सुंदरराजन, परियोजना प्रबंध्क, लार्सन एंड टुब्रो, हैवी सिविल इन्प्रफास्ट्रक्चर, जखीरा, नई दिल्ली एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय सं.
I, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 250/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/171/2015-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2033.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 250/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I, Delhi as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the S. Sundarrajan, Project Manager, Larsen & Toubro, Heavy Civil Infrastructure, Jakhira, New Delhi and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 11.08.2017.
[No. L-42012/171/2015-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 250/2015
Shri Pawan Kumar S/o late Shri Vishnu Dev House No.59, Gali No.I, Karan Vihar, Post Sector 6 Karnal, Haryana - 132 001
…Workman
Versus
Shri S. Sundarrajan, Project Manager, CC-28, Larsen & Toubro, Heavy Civil Infrastructure, 15, Shivaji Marg, Jakhira, New Delhi
…Management
AWARD
Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide letter No.L-42012/171/2015-IR(DU) dated 17.11.2015 referred an industrial dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act), terms of which are as under:
'Whether the workman, Shri Pawan Kumar is entitled to overtime wages for the period he worked beyond hours of work prescribed under the Act and is he entitled to any relief or compensation subsequent to his being relieved from service?'
2. Claim statement was filed by Shri Pawan Kumar, the claimant herein, wherein it is averred that he was initially appointed as cook on 15.02.2012 at L&T Staff Mess, B-1/104, II Floor, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. The claimant has put in more than 8 hours from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. with break of 3 hours from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. However, he was paid Rs.9000.00 only but no overtime wages was paid to him. The claimant is entitled to receive overtime wages at double the rate of his wages and a reputed company like the management who is well versed with labour laws has been exploiting the claimant by not paying is overtime wages, ESI, EPF etc., which is in violation of labour laws. The claimant had to proceed on leave from 25.03.2014 to 10.04.2014 in connection with school admission of his children and he had to overstay his leave for 5 days. However on his return, management refused to take him on duty. Wages for the month of March 2014 was also not paid to the claimant. His services were terminated without giving any retrenchment compensation, notice or notice pay, gratuity, earned wages and balance of overtime, which is in clear violation of labour laws. The claimant finally approached the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) who issued5958 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] notice to the management. However, due to the adamant attitude of the management, no conciliation could be arrived at. Hence, this reference. The claimant has also filed application under Minimum Wages Act. The claimant has prayed that he be reinstated in service with full back wages and all consequential benefits.
3. Written statement was filed by the management, who have taken various preliminary objections, including that of misuse of process of law by making of false and frivolous allegations, there being no relationship of employer and employee between the parties, suppression of true material facts etc. Management has denied the other material averments contained in the statement of claim. Finally, it has been prayed that the claim be dismissed.
4. Rejoinder was filed on behalf of the claimant wherein the stand taken in the statement of claim has been reasserted and denied the material allegations contained in the written statement of the management.
5. Based on the pleadings of the parties, this court vide order dated 22.02.2017 framed the following issues and the case was listed for evidence of the claimant:
(i) Whether the reference is not legally maintainable in view of the preliminary objections?
(ii) In terms of reference
6. In the meanwhile, parties stated that there was a possibility of settlement and the parties were directed to come with a specific offer. On 01.08.2017, in the Lok Adalat, management made an offer that they are ready and willing to consider the claim of the claimant and matter was discussed by the official of the management with their higher authorities, who took a favourable view of the matter. Finally, amicable settlement was arrived at between the parties. Claimant accepted the offer that he is ready and willing to accept an amount of Rs.30,000.00 as full and final settlement and his statement was recorded in the Lok Adalat on 01.08.2017 to the effect that he has settled all his disputes with the management, including the case pending before the Regional Labour Commissioner(Central) for an amount of Rs.30,000.00 as full and final settlement. He was paid an amount of Rs.10,000.00 in the Lok Adalat and the remaining amount of Rs.20,000.00 shall be paid by the management before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Jeevan Deep Building, New Delhi on 08.08.2017. Statement of Shri Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Manager:IR on behalf of the management was also recorded.
8. In view of the statements made by the claimant as well as Shri Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Manager:IR of the management, case was finally settled between the parties in the Lok Adalat on 01.08.2017. Since the claimant has settled his grievance and no controversy survives between the parties. Statements made by the claimant and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Manager:IR on behalf of the management shall form integral part of the award. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : August 7, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2034.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महानिदेशक,
भारत मौसम विज्ञान विभाग, मौसम भवन, लोदी रोड, नई दिल्ली एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों
के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय सं. I, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ
संख्या 62/2012द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42012/109/2011-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2034.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 62/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I, Delhi as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Director General, Bharat Mausam Vigyan Vibhag, Mausam Bhawan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 11.08.2017.
[No. L-42012/109/2011-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5959
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 62/2012
Smt. Uma Devi W/o Shri Laxman Dev, C/o All India General Mazdoor Trade Union, 170 Bal Mukund Khand Giri, Kalkaji, New Delhi - 110 019
…Workman
Versus
The Director General, Bharat Mausam Vigyan Vibhag, Mausam Bhawan (Bhoomi Vigyan Mantralaya), Lodhi Road, New Delhi
…Management
AWARD
Pursuant to receipt of a reference vide letter dated L-42012/109/2011-IR(DU) dated 17.02.2012 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act), this Tribunal is required to adjudicate an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:
Whether the action of the management of Director General of Meteorology, New Delhi in terminating the services of Smt. Uma Devi, Daily rated workman with effect from 10.03.2010 is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?
2. It is the case of Smt. Uma Devi (in short the claimant) that she was engaged as peon on 07.05.2004 with India Meteorological Department (in short the management) and her name was sponsored by Employment Exchange as daily wager @ Rs.151.00 per day. She was performing her duties sincerely and honestly. On 10.03.2010, caretaker Shri Kuldeep working with the management misbehaved with her and tried to outrage her modesty. She has also given in writing against the indecent behavior of Shri Kuldeep, but of no use. As a result of this, he was nursing a grudge against the claimant and her service was terminated on 10.03.2010. Her salary for the month of March 2010 has also not been paid. Thereafter, management recruited some other person in her place, which is patently illegal and in violation of provisions of the Act.
3. It is also the grievance of the claimant that she was not being paid minimum wages by the management and she has continuously worked with the management right from 07.05.2004 to 10.03.2010. She has not been paid wages from September 2009 to 10.03.2010. Thereafter, the claimant has sent demand notice vide letter dated 20.07.2010 but the management has not given reply to the said demand notice. Matter was also referred to the Assistant Labour Commissioner for conciliation. However, no settlement could be arrived at between the parties and the ALC under Section 12(4) of the Act submitted failure report to the appropriate Government, which resulted in making the above reference to this Tribunal.
4. The case was contested by the management, who filed written statement to the statement of claim. The management has taken preliminary objections, inter alia of the management not being covered under the definition of 'industry', and as such, this Tribunal cannot adjudicate the matter. There is no relationship of employer and employee between the management and the claimant. However, it is admitted that the claimant was engaged with the management for casual work of housekeeping till 31.10.2009 and thereafter the management has adopted the policy of Government of India for outsourcing of manpower for the works of housekeeping and open tender was invited and M/s. V.K. Engineering and Contractors, was engaged on 03.11.2009 for supply of manpower. The claimant was engaged by the above agency on 03.11.2009 and she was paid wages for the months of November 2009 to February 2010 by the said agency. Thus, till 31.10.2009 claimant had been engaged for the casual work of housekeeping and she has worked for the period a mentioned in para 3 of the written statement. It is reiterated that after 31.10.2009 management implemented the policy of the Government for outsourcing of manpower for the work of housekeeping. As such, there is no legal right of engaging or employing such permanent casual labour. Management also denied the allegation leveled against Shri Kuldeep. In para 5 of the written statement, it is admitted that the claimant has lodged complaint on 22.07.2010 with the Assistant Labour Commissioner and both parties had appeared before the Assistant Labour Commissioner. However, no settlement could be arrived at between the parties. Finally, prayer has been made by the management for rejection of the claim of the claimant.
5960 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]5. Against this factual background, based on the pleadings of the parties, my learned predecessor, vide order dated 15.05.2012, framed the following issues:
(i) Whether the claimant was engaged by M/s. V.K. Engineers & Contractors with effect from 03.11.2009 to February 2010 to discharge their obligations with the management in pursuance of agreement dated 03.11.2009.
(ii) Whether there were relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management with effect from 03.11.2009.?
(iii) Whether the management is an 'industry' as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act?
(iv) As in terms of reference
6. Claimant, in order to prove her case against the management, examined herself as WW1 and her affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. She also tendered in evidence documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/17. Management, in order to rebut the case of the claimant, examined Shri Nikhil Gupta, Field Officer as MW1 and Shri S.K. Roy, Assistant Meteorologist at MW2, whose affidavits are Ex.MW1/A and Ex.MW2/A and they had also relied on certain documents.
7. I have heard Shri Anil Rajput, A/R for the claimant and Shri Atul Bhardwaj, A/R for the management.
Issue No.iii
8. Since this issue is purely legal in nature and this objection has been taken by the management in its pleadings that the management does not fall within the definition of industry' as defined under section 2(j) of the Act, as such this Tribunal has no powers to adjudicate this case, is being taken first. Per contra, Shri Anil Rajput, authorized representative, appearing on behalf of the claimant urged that the definition of 'industry' as given in Section 2(j) of the Act is very wide and comprehensive so as to cover the nature of work which was being performed by the claimant herein is within the ambit of the expression 'industry'. In order to appreciate the submission raised by the management, it is necessary to reproduce the provision of section 2 (j) which defines industry as under:
"Industry" means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen.
"The definition of 'industry' is in two parts. In its first part it means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers. This part of definition determines an industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities. These activities are specified by five words and they determine when an industry is and what the cognate expression 'industrial' is intended to convey. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes. This part gives extended connotation. If the activity can be described as an industry with reference to the occupation of the employers, the ambit of the industry, under the force of the second part, takes in the different kinds of activity of the employees mentioned in the second part. But, the second part alone cannot define 'industry'. An industry is not to be found in every case of employment or service. By the inclusive part of the definition the labour force employed in an industry is made an integral part of the industry for purposes of industrial disputes although industry is ordinarily something which employers create or undertake. Before the work engaged in by an employer can be described as an industry, it must bear the definite character of 'trade' or 'business' or 'manufacture' or 'calling' or must be capable of being described as an undertaking resulting in material goods or material services. Where an activity is to be considered as an industry, it must not be casual but must be distinctly systematic and the work for which workmen are employed must be productive and the workmen must be following an employment, calling or industrial avocation. The work 'industry' must take its colour from the definition and that it discloses that a workman is to be regarded as one employed in an industry if he is following one of the vocations mentioned in conjunction with his employers engaged in the vocation mentioned in relation to the employers.
12. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978 (36) F.L.R. 266 dealt at length with the ambit and scope of expression industry as defined in section 2 (J) of the Act and held as under:
(a) Where a complex of activities, some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on the total undertaking some of whom are not "workmen" as in the University of Delhi case (supra) or some departments are not productive of goods and services if isolated, even then, the predominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur (supra), will be the true test. The whole undertaking will be 'industry' although those who are not 'workmen' by definition may not benefit by the status.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5961(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses, sovereign functions, strictly understood, (alone) qualify for exemption, not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or Statutory bodies.
(c) Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable, then can be considered to come within section 2 (j).
(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions way well remove from the scope of the Act categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.
(e) We overrule Safdarjung (supra), Solicitors' case (supra), Gymkhana (supra), Delhi University (supra), Dhanrajgirji Hospital (supra) and other ruling whose ratio runs counter to the principles enunciated above, and Hospital Mazdoor Sabha (supra) is hereby rehabilitated."
9. It is also clear from various rulings rendered by various High Courts as well as Hon'ble Apex Court that any skilled or unskilled activity being performed by the workman in the department of the Government, as is the position in the present case, would also be covered by the definition of 'industry' as defined above. Since the claimant herein was doing all kinds of work of peon and housekeeping jobs etc., the same would fall within the 2nd para of the definition i.e. services being taken by the employer from the workman. Learned A/R for the management could not cite any authority were it has been held that Meteorological Department of the Government of India does not fall within the definition of 'industry' and the department had engaged the claimant for performing manual and housekeeping work. In view of this, this issue is decided accordingly.
Issue No.(i), (ii) and (iv)
10. All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are inter-related and can be conveniently disposed of. It is clear from matrix of the pleadings on record that the claimant was engaged on 07.05.2004 as her name was sponsored by Employment Exchange as daily wager @ Rs.151.00 per day. Management has come with specific stand that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management. In para 2 of the preliminary objections, it is alleged that the claimant was engaged by the management for casual work of housekeeping till 31.10.2009. After that, the management has adopted policy of Government for outsourcing of manpower for the work of housekeeping through open tender. It was thereafter that the management had outsourced the job to M/s. V.K. Engineers and Contractors. A careful perusal of the written statement filed by the management would show that in para 1 of the written statement, on merits it has been admitted that the claimant was engaged as peon and as per office record she was engaged for casual work on 11.05.2005 for 89 days with few spells and the dates of engagement has been given in Annexure AI. As per the contention of the management, engagement of the claimant from 07.05.2004 is totally false. Since management has admitted in the pleadings that she was initially engaged on 11.05.2005 for 89 days for few spells as casual worker, in such circumstances, it is clear that the claimant was initially directly engaged by the management for the work of housekeeping etc. In this regard, it is appropriate to refer to the statement of the claimant WW1 whose affidavit is Ex.WW1/A. Affidavit of the claimant is on the same lines as the stand taken in her statement of claim. She has specifically denied the suggestion, while appearing as WW1, that she was initially engaged only for specific period. Rather, she has deposed that her appointment was regular. She admitted that she does not have any document to show that she was engaged by the management and was working since 07.05.2005. She has clarified that gate pass was issued to her only in 2005 and prior to this, she was allowed entry without any gate pass. She has admitted that her name was sponsored by employment exchange for working with the management many a times and she was being engaged by the management as and when her name was sponsored. She has denied that the employment exchange has sponsored her name only 4 times. She has also named Ms.Seeba, officer of the management who had appointed her. It was Shri Kuldeep, Caretaker, who had terminated her services. He had also misbehaved with her. She has denied the suggestion that from 11.05.2005 to 31.01.2008 she had not worked in the office of Deputy Director General Meteorology and she clarified that she has served Deputy Director General Meteorology from 07.05.2004 till 2007. From 19.03.2008 to 31.10.2009 she was engaged in the office of Director General, Meteorology. It is, thus, clear from the various suggestions given to the claimant by the management that she was in the employment of the management right from 11.05.2005 till 31.10.2009 either in the office of Deputy Director General Meteorology or in the other wing of the management. She has specifically denied that she has been paid wages for the month of November 09 by the contractor M/s. V.K. Engineers and Contractors. She has denied that she has been paid entire wages up to 10.03.2010. She has specifically denied that she herself stopped attending her duties. It is pertinent to note here that though the claimant was cross-examined three times on different occasions, no document regarding payment of wages by the contractor directly to the claimant was put to her. It is the stand of the management that from November 2009 work was outsourced to M/s. V.K. Engineers and Contractors.
11. It is not out of place to mention that even regarding indecent assault by Shri Kuldeep, claimant has moved application to Ayukt Police Delhi ITO, copy of which is Ex.WW1/1 wherein there is specific mention of the fact that5962 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Shri Kuldeep, Caretaker had tried to sexually harass her. She has also filed application before the Rashtriya Mahila Ayog Ex.WW1/2. Copy of complaint letter fled by the claimant is Ex.WW1/5 which bears her signature, where she has raised the present industrial dispute against her illegal termination on 10.03.2010. Thus, from evidence adduced by the claimant, relationship of employer and employee even in the year 2005 onwards stands established. The very fact that the management has stated that she was initially engaged for a few days only is also clearly suggestive of the fact that she was directly in the employment of the management right from the year 2005.
12. Statement of Shri Nikhil Gupta MW1 regarding direct relationship of employer and employee between the claimant and the management is not of much help as this witness has only deposed regarding the period after November 2009 when work was outsourced to M/s V.K. Engineer and Contractors. As per affidavit of this witness Ex.WW2/A, claimant was engaged on 03.11.2009 and her period of engagement is also mentioned in paras 2 and 3 of the affidavit. This witness has also made a vital admission in his cross examination that prior to her engagement by the contractor she was working in Mausam Bhawan prior to November 2009. Statement of this witness also does not inspire confidence as he has deposed in his cross examinant that the claimant alongwith other daily wagers worked with Mausam Bhawan and requested the contractor for their engagement. There was normally no question of making request to the contractor directly inasmuch as the claimant was already in the employment of the management. Finally, wage slip Ex.MW1/1 as well as Ex.MW2/2 to Ex.MW2/4 is not of much help to the management as these are pay slips pertaining to the period January 10 onwards. Pay slip Ex.MW1/4 shows that the claimant was working at IMO New Delhi and her salary was paid through M/s V.K Engineers and Contractors. Ex.MW1/5 is the copy of attendance roll of the workmen engaged by M/s V.K. Engineers and Contractors and name of the claimant is mentioned at serial No.5.
13. Since from the evidence on record, it is apparent that the claimant was initially engaged as casual labour even as per the stand of the management, in the year 2005 though the case of the claimant is that she was engaged by the management on 07.05.2004. Admittedly, when the above work was outsourced and given to the contractor M/s V.K. Engineers and Contractors in November 2009, claimant was already in the employment prior to that or directly under the management. As this fact has been duly admitted by MW1 also, in such a situation, it was incumbent upon the management to have filed and proved the documents that she was not at the relevant time directly engaged by the management or she has not completed 240 days in a calendar year when the work was outsourced to M/s V.K. Engineers and Contractor in November 2009. Management has not proved attendance roll pertaining to the years 2004- 05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 showing the period during which the claimant, in fact, has worked as peon/housekeeping in the premises of the management. During the course of arguments, this fact was not even disputed by the management that she was working in the premises of India Meteorological Department right from 2005 and the only submission raised by the management is that in fact she was a casual worker and was employed on need basis from 2005 till 2009; as such, there was no question of her regular employment with the management since the claimant herein was in the employment as casual labour or daily wager worker etc. with the management. As such, the claimant would fall within the definition of 'workman' as defined under Section 2(s) of the Act. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council Sanaur (AIR 2011 SC 2532), while interpreting provisions of Section 2(s) of the Act which deals with the definition of 'Workman', held as under:
'The source of employment, the method of recruitment, the terms and conditions of employment/contract of service, the quantum of wages/pay and the mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s)of the Act.
The definition of workman also does not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only a person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman.
14. Shri Bhardwaj appearing on behalf of the management strongly urged that since there was no relationship of employer and employee after 03.11.2009 between the claimant and the management inasmuch as work of housekeeping was outsourced to M/s V.K. Engineering and Contractors, as such, there is no question of issuance of one month notice or pay in lieu thereof in terms of section 25-F of the Act by the management. Attention of the Tribunal was also invited by Shri Bhardwaj to the documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/6 which shows that the claimant was working on the rolls of M/s V.K. Engineers and Contractors. In the present case, there was no evidence adduced by the management that the management was duly registered in terms of Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970(in short CLRA Act) with the appropriate Government. It is normally required that every principal employer is to apply for registration with necessary documents and it is only thereafter when necessary conditions are fulfilled that certificate of registration is issued by the competent authority. Similarly, Section 12 of the CLRA Act also requires that every contractor who is outsourced any work through contract labour is to obtain Licence in terms provisions of the CLRA Act. The said licence shall contain all the necessary conditions, including the work[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5963 outsourced, fixation of wages, and other amenities in respect of which he is engaging contract labour. Since no evidence has been adduced by the management regarding issuance of licence in terms of Section 12 of the CLRA Act nor there is mention in the affidavit Ex.MW1/A and EX.MW2/A, the only presumption which can be drawn is that neither the management was registered under Section 7 of the CLRA Act nor the contractor M/s V.K. Engineers and Contractors has obtained necessary licence in terms of Section 12 of the CLRA Act.
15. It is also necessary to mention here that even in this case where work has been given on contract basis validly under provisions of the CLRA Act, it is the duty of the principal employer to ensure payment of wages and principal employer is also required to ensure compliance of various safeguards meant for welfare of the workmen are adhered to by such contractors to whom work has been allotted. Contention of the management that the claimant left the work of her own does not inspire confidence as a workman who is in need of a job to make both ends meet would not normally abandon the job without any rhyme or reason. Moreover, work which the claimant is performing is not of seasonal or casual in nature. Rather, the same is regular and perennial in nature. There are various authorities that in such circumstances when the work is of regular nature, normally managements should not outsource it to private contractors.
16. During the course of arguments, this Tribunal tried to persuade the management to give employment to the claimant. However, she was being offered employment as casual labour through contractor, which was not acceptable to her. Admittedly, the claimant was working in the premises of Meteorological Department at all material times and the action of the management or even that of the contractor in dispensing her services with effect from 10.03.2010 is clearly in violation of section 25-F of the Act as no one months' notice was given to her before retrenching her nor salary in lieu of one month notice was given by the management before dispensing with her services.
17. It is now well settled position in law that provisions of Section 25-F are mandatory and non compliance of the same would result in the action of the management to be void or non est in the eyes of law, particularly when no retrenchment compensation was offered or given to the claimant.
18. The other residual question is as to what relief the claimant is entitled to? It was seriously urged on behalf of the claimant that she is unemployed after her termination. There is no evidence on record to suggest that the claimant was gainfully employed after his termination. More so, in the absence of any evidence adduced by the management to this effect, version of the claimant is to be accepted.
19. Regarding claim of back wages, it has been made amply clear in Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.Ed) and others (2013 Lab.I.C. 4249), as under:
'Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then it has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she was drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was not employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments.'
20. Yet again Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raj Kumar Dixit Vs. Vijay Kumar Gauri Shankar (2015) 9 SCC 345) set aside the judgement of Hon'ble High Court wherein back wages were reduced to 50% and held that High Court has exceeded its jurisdiction in setting aside the award passed by the Labour Court in awarding reinstatement to the workman to his post. It was observed that there are a number of factors which are to be taken into consideration by the Tribunal while considering the question of grant of back wages, including reinstatement. Relevant factors are, (i) whether the workman has approached the Tribunal at the earliest or there was delay in seeking reference, (ii) nature of the post, (iii) length of service as well as availability of vacancy when the question of reinstatement is being decided. Since facts of no two cases are similar, as such, the Tribunal is required to keep in mind the above circumstances before ordering grant of back wages. Legal position which emerges from the above two rulings is that where there is violation of provisions of law by the management in passing order of termination or retrenchment and evidence on record is clear that the workman was not gainfully employed or was not having any other source of income to make both ends meet during the period when the matter was being considered by the Tribunal, in such circumstances, Tribunal can always grant full back wages alongwith reinstatement.
21. In view of the ratio of law enunciated in the above rulings, when action of the management is purely illegal and is not in accordance with law. It is clear from the pleadings as well as evidence on record that the claimant was not gainfully employed after her termination; in such circumstances, this Tribunal is of the opinion that action of the management is per se illegal and it is held that the action of the management of Director General of Meteorology in5964 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] terminating the services of Smt.Uma Devi, the claimant herein, daily rated workman with effect from 10.03.2010 is held to be illegal and not justified under the law. As sequel to my above discussion, it is held that the claimant herein is entitled to be reinstated in service with full back wages. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : August 4, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2035.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार क्षेत्राीय
कार्यकारी अभियंता, मैसर्स दिल्ली विकास प्राध्किरण, द्वारका, केन्द्रीय नर्सरी, नई दिल्ली व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय
सं. I, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 95/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42025/03/2017-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2035.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 95/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I, Delhi as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Regional Executive Engineer, M/s. Delhi Vikas Pradhikaran, Dwarka, Kendriya Nursary, New Delhi & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 11.08.2017.
[No. L-42025/03/2017-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 95/2015
Sh. Alkesh Singh S/o Sh. Ram Dayal Singh Represented by M/s Delhi Pradesh Shramik Sangh (Regd) C-1/140, Sanjay Enclave, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 …Workman
Versus
1. M/s High Command,
171-B, DG-2 Vikaspuri, New Delhi-110018
2. The Regional Executive Engineer, M/s Delhi Vikas Pradhikaran, Udhan Khan, Dwarka, Sector-5, Kendriya Nursary , New Delhi – 110075
3. The Director,
Delhi Vikash Pradhikaran, Kendriya Nursary & Udhan Khand, Vikash Sadan, I.N.A. Market, New Delhi-110002
…Managements[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5965
AWARD
This is a case filed directly under Section 2-A of Industrial Disputes, Act, 1947 (in short the Act) by the claimant with the averment that management No. 2 has engaged the claimant on 18.05.2009. He has been performing his duty since then honestly and diligently on salary of Rs.13,500/- p.m.
2. It is a case of claimant that on 25.07.2010 at 12.30 p.m. when he was on duty on sewerage pump and he was caught by the goondas. There was no light and he was assaulted by the goondas resulting in injury on his body. Despite this, claimant remained on duty and he was not paid wages by the management for the month of July & August, 2010. The services of the claimant was ultimately terminated on 15.09.2010 by the management. The claimant also informed the management vide letter dated 30.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination and non payment of retiral benefits. The claimant has also approached Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and management also appeared before A.L.C. However, matter could not be settled in view of the audacious attitude of the management resulting in failure of conciliation report on 15.04.2015.
3. Now, the claimant has directly filed the present claim before this Tribunal under Section 2-A of the Act challenging his illegal termination and has claimed reinstatement with the back wages. The claim was contested by the management who was filed written statement to the claim taking preliminary objections of maintainability, etc. The management has denied most of the material averments made in the various paras. However, it is admitted that the last contract was awarded to Respondent no. 1 for the period of 12 months w.e.f. 31.12.2009 and thereafter the management no. 1 has no work of gunman at the said site. The claimant was engaged from 01.01.2010 to 25.07.2010 for few days of daily basis and prior to this he was not working on the said site.
4. Against this factual background, this Tribunal vide order dated October 20, 2016 framed following issues on the basis of pleadings of the parties:
(i) Whether claim petition filed by the claimant is not legally maintainable in view of the various preliminary objections?
(ii) Whether termination of the claimant on 15.09.2010 by the management is illegal and unjustified, as alleged?
(iii) Relief.
5. Thereafter, an application for amendment of written statement was filed by the management and it was made clear by this Tribunal that there is no need to amend written statement as question of limitation is covered by issue No.1 which deals with the maintainability of the claim petition.
6. Both the AR for the respective parties agreed that before proceedings with matter on merits it is necessary to deal with the question of maintainability of the present petition which appears to be time barred. Thereafter, several opportunities were given to AR for the claim so as to satisfy this Tribunal as to how the claim petition was legally maintainable after 03 years of the date of termination of the workman in view of embargo contained in sub-section-3 of Section 2-A which reads as under :
"Dismissal, etc. of an individual workman to be deemed to be an industrial dispute -
(1) Where any employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the services of an individual workman, any dispute or difference between that workman and his employer connected with, or arising out of, such discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute notwithstanding that no other workman nor any union of workman is a party to the dispute.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 10, any such workman as is specified in sub-section (1) may, make an application direct to the Labour or Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute referred to therein after the expiry of forty-five days from the date he has made the application to the conciliation Officer of the appropriate Government for conciliation of the dispute, and I receipt of such application the Labour Court or Tribunal shall have powers and jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute, as if it were a dispute referred to it by the appropriate Government in accordance with the provisions of this Act and all the provisions of this Act shall apply in relation to such adjudication as they apply in relation to an industrial dispute referred to it by the appropriate Government.
5966 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](3) The application referred to in sub-section (2) shall be made to the Labour Court or Tribunal before the expiry of three years from the date of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of service as specified in sub-section (1).
7. It is clear from bare perusal of the above provision that in case of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of the service of an individual workman, the workman has to file the claim within 03 years from the date of retrenchment, etc.
8. It is apposite to mention here that provisions of the limitation Act are not applicable to proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act which is special enactment and a self-contained code. I am fortified, in this regard by the ratio of the case in "Shri Ajaib Singh Vs. The Sirhind Co-operative Marketing Cum-Processing Service Society Limited and Anr. - AIR 1999SC1351"
In the said case the services of the workman was terminated by the management without compliance of mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, workman did not initiate any action by approaching the Tribunal or Labour Court for 07 years. It was against this background the question of applicability of provisions of the Limitation Act was considered by the Court. There are also observation in the above case that when a reference was made by the appropriate Government under Section 10 of the Act of the Industrial Disputes Act in that eventuality, the question delay and laches is not material and, Tribunal or Court, is required to adjudicate the case on merits and such a reference can't be dismissed on the grounds of the limitation as provisions of Limitation Act are not applicable in such proceedings under the Act. But this was not a case under Section 2-A of the Act, wherein a special right is given to individual workman to file case within 03 years from termination.
9. Yet, in another case i.e. Smt. Swaroop Adhikari Vs. State of West Bengal 2014 LLR 498 (CAL) it was held that under no circumstances the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court while dealing with the case under Section 2-A of the Act can extend limitation or entertain a case after the expiry of three years from the date of retrenchment or termination. This is a special right to an individual workman under Section 2-A to approach the Court directly, in case of retrenchment or termination. In the present case, it is clear from statement of claim that service of workman was terminated by management on 15.09.2010 whereas he filed present case on 12.03.2015 i.e. after the expiry of 03 years from termination. Resultantly, the claim filed by the claimant is held not to be legally maintainable as same is timebarred.
10. As a sequel to my aforesaid discussion, it is held that claim petition filed by the claimant is not maintainable as the same is time barred, being filed by after 03 years from the date of termination. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Accordingly claim is dismissed.
Dated : August 4, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 24 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2036.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेडिकल
अध्ीक्षक, मैसर्स गोवद बल्लभ पंत चिकित्सालय, नई दिल्ली व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके
कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय सं. I, दिल्ली के पंचाट
;संदर्भ संख्या 01/2017द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42025/03/2017-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 24th August, 2017
S.O. 2036.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 01/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. I, Delhi as shown in Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Medical Superintendent, M/s. Govind Ballab Pant Chikitsalaya, New Delhi & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 11.08.2017.
[No. L-42025/03/2017-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5967
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO. 1, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI
ID No. 1/2017
Smt. Sunita Sharma W/o Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, R/o A-9, Lal Bagh, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
…Workman
Versus
1. The Medical Superintendent,
M/s Govind Ballab Pant Chikitsalaya, New Delhi – 110 002
2. M/s Sukhvander Singh Rathee Security Agency(Regd.),
Shop No.54, Mezzanine Floor, Local Shopping Complex, A Block, Ring Road, Narayana, New Delhi – 110 028
…Managements
AWARD
Present dispute has been raised by Ms.Sunita Sharma (in short the claimant) under the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act). A period of 45 days stood expired from the date of making her application before the Conciliation Officer. Sub-section (2) of section 2-A of the Act empowers her to file a dispute before this Tribunal, without being referred by the appropriate Government. Her contention stands substantiated by the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 2-A of the Act. Claimant has been given a right by the Act to approach this Tribunal in case of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or otherwise termination of her service, without a dispute being referred by the appropriate Government under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Act. Since dispute was within the period of limitation, as enacted by sub section (3), and answered requirements of sub-section (2) of section 2-A of the Act, it was registered as an industrial dispute, even without being referred for adjudication by the appropriate Government, under section 10(1) (d) of the Act.
2. Claim statement was filed by the claimant herein with the averment that she was engaged on 01.04.2014 by Medical Superintendent , Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital (in short the Hospital ) through M/s Sukhvander Singh Rathee Security Agency (Regd.) (in short the contractor )as Lady Security Guard on a monthly salary of Rs.12,168.00. The hospital was exercising supervisory control over her as she was performing duties in the premises of the management. The management was not having a valid licence under section 7, 10 and 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 to employ contract labour. The work she was performing is of regular and perennial in nature and engagement of contract labour under Section 10 of the of the CLRA Act is prohibited under the law. Moreover, the contractor was not having licence in terms of provisions of Section 12 of the CLRA Act. The agreement between the management and the contractor is sham and camouflage and as such the claimant shall be considered in the employment of the Hospital.
3. It is the case of the claimant that she was deprived of various facilities, such as overtime allowance, dearness allowance, identity card, wage slip, casual leave, EPF etc. The amount which was being deducted as provident fund every month, in fact, was never paid to her or credited in her account nor was she paid salary from August 2015 to December 2015. Claimant was also not made payment for her overtime work for 8 days during this period. Resultantly, her services were ultimately terminated without issuance of show cause notice on 01.01.2014 as she was refused to join duties. Claimant also took up the matter and filed complaint before the Labour Commissioner wherein she has alleged the above facts. Claimant has raised demand through the union vide letter dated 01.01.2004 but the management has not taken any action upon the same. Management has also violated provisions of section 25-F of the Act. Management has also not filed any reply before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, as a result of which proceedings ended into failure. Finally, claimant has prayed that her termination from 01.01.2016 be declared illegal and she be reinstated with full back wages.
4. Notice of the claim was served on managements and despite service of notice none appeared on behalf of the management as well as the contractors since inception. Resultantly, the management as well as the contractors were proceeded ex-parte on 28.04.2017.
5. Claimant, in support of her stand taken in the statement of claim, examined herself as WW1 and tendered in evidence documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/9.
6. I have heard Shri Kailash Kumar, A/R for the claimant.
5968 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]7. It is clear from the averments contained in affidavit Ex.WW1/A tendered by the claimant that the same is on similar lines as the statement of claim as she has reiterated all the material facts in the above affidavit. Since both the managements were proceeded ex-parte, there is no cross examination of the claimant by any of the managements. Claimant has also tendered copy of demand notice Ex.WW1/1 served upon the management, wherein she has referred to all the material facts. Claimant has also written letter to the Chief Manager of Delhi, copy of which is Ex.WW1/2 wherein she has raised all her grievances being faced by her. Claim filed by the claimant before the Assistant Labour Commissioner is Ex.WW1/4 and is on the same lines as the claim filed before this Tribunal.
8. During the course of arguments, learned A/R for the claimant invited attention of the Tribunal to the identity card Ex.WW1/5 which shows that the same was issued by M/s Sukhvander Singh Rathee Security Agency(Regd), contractor, and the date of birth of the claimant in the said identity card is 08.07.1971 and her designation is Ladies Security Guard. This identity card also shows that the claimant was engaged as Security Guard through the contractor with the Hospital. Ex.WW1/7 is the UAN of PPF of the claimant.
9. In the case on hand, there is no evidence adduced by the management to rebut the evidence of the claimant. Law is fairly settled that if material fact which is alleged by a party in its pleadings is not controverted by the opposite party nor any evidence is adduced by such a party in contravention of the facts alleged in the statement of claim, in that eventuality, court can always rely upon pleadings as well as statement made by the claimant in support of the same. Moreover, the identity card of the claimant suggests that she was engaged as security guard by M/s Sukhvander Singh Rathee Security Agency, which clearly supports the case of the claimant.
10. Admittedly, in the case on hand, there is nothing on record to suggest as to why services of the claimant was terminated and that she was refused not to come on duty on 01.01.2016. Now, law is fairly settled by the various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as Hon'ble High Courts that services of the claimant even if it has been deployed on daily wages or contract basis, cannot be terminated if he had worked for 240 days in the preceding 12 months and services of such workmen cannot be terminated or dispensed with unless one month notice in writing giving reasons for retrenchment is made or the workman has been paid one month salary in lieu of such notice, as required under Section 25-F of the Act. Equally settled is the position in law that compliance of provisions of Section 25-F is mandatory and non-compliance of the same would result in rendering order of termination/retrenchment void or non-est under the law. Since in the case on hand, management has neither taken care to appear before this court so as to rebut the case of the claimant nor there is any evidence on record that the claimant has voluntarily left her services, as such, this Tribunal is of the view that there is clear-cut violation of section 25-F of the Act and termination of the claimant with effect from 01.01.2014 is illegal and void.
11. As a sequel to my above discussion, it is held that termination of the claimant herein is wrong and illegal. Since Govind Ballab Pant Hospital is the principal employer and they have not filed any contract agreement nor there is any evidence on record to show whether M/s Sukhvander Singh Rathee Security Agency(Regd.), the contractor, was having valid licence in terms of Section 12 of the CLRA Act, as such, claimant shall be deemed to be in the employment of Govind Ballab Pant Hospital, who is otherwise the principal employer for whose benefit the claimant was working. In spite of various opportunities afforded to the managements, evidence remained un-rebutted and there is no reason to disbelieve the version of the claimant in the absence of any evidence from the management. In view of this, it is held that the claimant is entitled to be reinstated and her termination is held to be illegal and unjust under the law and as a corollary, Ms.Sunita Sharma, the claimant herein, is entitled for reinstatement with full back wages. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : August 4, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2037.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सकल
हेड-एचआर, रिलायंस कम्युनिकेशन लिमिटेड, आरडीएजी हाउस, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय,
अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 01/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/88/2009-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5969
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2037.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 01/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Circle Head-HR, Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/88/2009-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 01/2010
1. The Circle Head – HR,
Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015
2. The Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd.,
RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015 …First Party
V/s
Shri Harish Kumar Rathod, VI-Sama, Angan Flat 104, Opp. Jalaram Mandir, Baroda(Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri R.K. Shah For the Second Party : Shri Anand B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/88/ 2009-IR(DU) dated 14.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Harish Kumar Rathod w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.12.2009. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 22.03.2010 alleging that he is duly qualified and experienced serviceman and was appointed on 01.09.2005 at Surat vide EC No. 35020147 after rigorous process of interview. Since then he had been working continuously since the date of appointment that is 01.09.2005 till 01.06.2009 when he was abruptly terminated from the service without giving any notice. He has also been subjected to examination of performance management system every six months after the date of appointment and was also subjected to training. He qualified all these examinations and training. It is noteworthy that the first party Reliance Communication Ltd. also issued him a certificate of appreciation of service. For all these5970 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] years of his service, he was appreciated as very good or commendable services but it is unfortunate that termination order was issued narrating the service as unsatisfactory. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of service.
2. It is further alleged that the action of termination of services of this workman is illegal, inoperative, bad in law on some of the grounds and reasons, as under:
a. It is mandatory and is a condition precedent for termination/retrenchment of workman that Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is followed. In this case Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is completely given a go by. Thus termination of workman is invalid and inoperative in the eyes of law workman continues to be in service, with all the consequential benefits.
b. Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is also grossly violated. Workman was terminated by pick and choose manner without going by "last come first go" principle. The workman submits that numbers of juniors to him are continued in service.
c. The reason of unsatisfactory performance given in termination order is totally false and fabricated. There is no material whatsoever to classify as unsatisfactory performance and to terminate the services in such capricious manner by "hire and fire" systems.
d. The workman submits that numbers of new persons are appointed for the same work which the workman was doing before termination of this services. Thus Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is violated.
e. No seniority list was published or informed to workman, which is necessary and mandatory under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act.
f. Workman has been terminated from services on the same day of the termination order i.e. service is terminated also contrary and in violation of the terms of appointment. Workman has not been given any notice or notice pay of any nature at the time of the termination or afterwards or till this time.
3. Thus in the light of the aforesaid averments, the workman has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
4. The first party/opposite party Reliance Communication Ltd. was issued notice and was represented by advocate Shri R.K. Shah and Shri R.K. Shah submitted the written statement Ex. 12 on 21.10.2011.
5. The second party workman submitted his affidavit cum examination in chief Ex. 10 on 16.07.2010 wherein the workman reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 5. But thereafter even filing the vakalatpatra Ex. 11 and written statement Ex. 12 on 21.10.2011 by the advocate Shri Rajiv K. Shah and also seeking adjournment on 17.10.2013 for cross-examination on payment of Rs. 100/- as cost, Shri Rajiv K. Shah advocate never appeared to cross-examine the workman on Ex. 10 on all the dates thereafter.
6. Thus on the basis of the un-rebutted affidavit Ex. 10, it can be inferred that the service of the second party workman were illegally terminated without following the due process of law.
7. Thus on the basis of the aforesaid discussions, the reference is decided ex-parte on the basis of the un-rebutted affidavit of the workman with the observation as under: the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Harish Kumar Rathod w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is illegal and unjustified."
8. The Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., is directed to reinstate the workman with immediate effect with continuity of service and back wages of lump-sum amount of Rs. 100000/-.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2038.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सकल
हेड-एचआर, रिलायंस कम्युनिकेशन लिमिटेड, आरडीएजी हाउस, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय,
अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 02/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/89/2009-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5971
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2038.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 02/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Circle Head-HR, Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/89/2009-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 02/2010
1. The Circle Head – HR,
Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015
2. The Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd.,
RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015 …First Party
V/s
Shri Mukesh Kumar N. Jani, D-12/142, Nandanvan Apartment, Opp. Bhavsar Hostel, Nava Vadaj, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri R.K. Shah For the Second Party : Shri Anand B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/89/ 2009-IR(DU) dated 14.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Mukesh Kumar N. Jani w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.12.2009.The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 22.03.2010 alleging that he is duly qualified and experienced serviceman and was appointed on 18.01.2005 at Ahmedabad vide EC No. 35020283 after rigorous process of interview. Since then he had been working continuously since the date of appointment that is 18.01.2005 till 01.06.2009 when he was abruptly terminated from the service without giving any notice. He has also been subjected to examination of performance management system every six months after the date of appointment and was also subjected to training. He qualified all these examinations and training. It is noteworthy that the first party Reliance Communication Ltd. also issued him a certificate of appreciation of service. For all these years of his service, he was appreciated as very good or commendable services but it is5972 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] unfortunate that termination order was issued narrating the service as unsatisfactory. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of service.
2. It is further alleged that the action of termination of services of this workman is illegal, inoperative, bad in law on some of the grounds and reasons, as under:
a. It is mandatory and is a condition precedent for termination/retrenchment of workman that Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is followed. In this case Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is completely given a go by. Thus termination of workman is invalid and inoperative in the eyes of law workman continues to be in service, with all the consequential benefits.
b. Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is also grossly violated. Workman was terminated by pick and choose manner without going by "last come first go" principle. The workman submits that numbers of juniors to him are continued in service.
c. The reason of unsatisfactory performance given in termination order is totally false and fabricated. There is no material whatsoever to classify as unsatisfactory performance and to terminate the services in such capricious manner by "hire and fire" systems.
d. The workman submits that numbers of new persons are appointed for the same work which the workman was doing before termination of this services. Thus Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is violated.
e. No seniority list was published or informed to workman, which is necessary and mandatory under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act.
f. Workman has been terminated from services on the same day of the termination order i.e. service is terminated also contrary and in violation of the terms of appointment. Workman has not been given any notice or notice pay of any nature at the time of the termination or afterwards or till this time.
3. Thus in the light of the aforesaid averments, the workman has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
4. The first party/opposite party Reliance Communication Ltd. was issued notice and was represented by advocate Shri R.K. Shah and Shri R.K. Shah submitted the written statement Ex. 11 on 21.10.2011.
5. The second party workman submitted his affidavit cum examination in chief Ex. 9 on 16.07.2010 wherein the workman reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 4. But thereafter even filing the vakalatpatra Ex. 10 and written statement Ex. 11 on 21.10.2011 by the advocate Shri Rajiv K. Shah and also seeking adjournment Ex. 13 on 17.10.2013 for cross-examination, Shri Rajiv K. Shah advocate never appeared to cross-examine the workman on Ex. 9 on all the dates thereafter.
6. Thus on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit Ex. 9, it can be inferred that the service of the second party workman were illegally terminated without following the due process of law.
7. Thus on the basis of the aforesaid discussions, the reference is decided ex-parte on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit of the workman with the observation as under: the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Mukesh Kumar N. Jani w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is illegal and unjustified."
8. The Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., is directed to reinstate the workman with immediate effect with continuity of service and back wages of lump-sum amount of Rs. 100000/-.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2039.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सकल
हेड-एचआर, रिलायंस कम्युनिकेशन लिमिटेड, आरडीएजी हाउस, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय,
अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 03/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/87/2009-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5973
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2039.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 03/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Circle Head-HR, Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/87/2009-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 03/2010
1. The Circle Head – HR,
Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015
2. The Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd.,
RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015 …First Party
V/s
Shri Jayantibhai Keshavlal Kathrotiya, A-6, Alap Enclave, University Road, Near New Yogi Nagar, Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri R.K. Shah For the Second Party : Shri Anand B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/87/ 2009-IR(DU) dated 14.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Jayantibhai K. Kathrotiya w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.12.2009.The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 22.03.2010 alleging that he is duly qualified and experienced serviceman and was appointed on 28.08.2003 at Rajkot vide EC No. 35020180 after rigorous process of interview. Since then he had been working continuously since the date of appointment that is 28.08.2003 till 01.06.2009 when he was abruptly terminated from the service without giving any notice. He has also been subjected to examination of performance management system every six months after the date of appointment and was also subjected to training. He qualified all these examinations and training. It is noteworthy that the first party Reliance Communication Ltd. also issued him a certificate of appreciation of service. For all these5974 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] years of his service, he was appreciated as very good or commendable services but it is unfortunate that termination order was issued narrating the service as unsatisfactory. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of service.
2. It is further alleged that the action of termination of services of this workman is illegal, inoperative, bad in law on some of the grounds and reasons, as under:
a. It is mandatory and is a condition precedent for termination/retrenchment of workman that Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is followed. In this case Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is completely given a go by. Thus termination of workman is invalid and inoperative in the eyes of law workman continues to be in service, with all the consequential benefits.
b. Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is also grossly violated. Workman was terminated by pick and choose manner without going by "last come first go" principle. The workman submits that numbers of juniors to him are continued in service.
c. The reason of unsatisfactory performance given in termination order is totally false and fabricated. There is no material whatsoever to classify as unsatisfactory performance and to terminate the services in such capricious manner by "hire and fire" systems.
d. The workman submits that numbers of new persons are appointed for the same work which the workman was doing before termination of this services. Thus Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is violated.
e. No seniority list was published or informed to workman, which is necessary and mandatory under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act.
f. Workman has been terminated from services on the same day of the termination order i.e. service is terminated also contrary and in violation of the terms of appointment. Workman has not been given any notice or notice pay of any nature at the time of the termination or afterwards or till this time.
3. Thus in the light of the aforesaid averments, the workman has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
4. The first party/opposite party Reliance Communication Ltd. was issued notice and was represented by advocate Shri R.K. Shah and Shri R.K. Shah submitted the written statement Ex. 14 on 04.11.2011.
5. The second party workman submitted his affidavit cum examination in chief Ex. 10 on 16.07.2010 wherein the workman reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 5 But thereafter even filing the vakalatpatra Ex. 13 and written statement Ex. 14 on 04.11.2011 by the advocate Shri Rajiv K. Shah and also seeking adjournment Ex. 17 on 17.10.2013 for cross-examination on payment of Rs. 100/- as cost, Shri Rajiv K. Shah advocate never appeared to cross-examine the workman on Ex. 10 on all the dates thereafter.
6. Thus on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit Ex. 10, it can be inferred that the service of the second party workman were illegally terminated without following the due process of law.
7. Thus on the basis of the aforesaid discussions, the reference is decided ex-parte on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit of the workman with the observation as under: the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Jayantibhai Keshavlal Kathrotiya w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is illegal and unjustified."
8. The Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., is directed to reinstate the workman with immediate effect with continuity of service and back wages of lump-sum amount of Rs. 100000/-.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2040.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सकल
हेड-एचआर, रिलायंस कम्युनिकेशन लिमिटेड, आरडीएजी हाउस, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय,
अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 04/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/90/2009-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5975
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2040.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 04/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Circle Head-HR, Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/90/2009-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 04/2010
1. The Circle Head – HR,
Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015
2. The Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd.,
RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015 …First Party
V/s
Shri Krishna Singh, H-19, New Charli, Behind Diggam Woolen Mill, P.O. Khodiyar Colony, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri R.K. Shah
For the Second Party : Shri Anand B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/90/ 2009-IR(DU) dated 14.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Krishna Singh w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.12.2009.The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 22.03.2010 alleging that he is duly qualified and experienced serviceman and was appointed on 19.11.2004 at Rajkot vide EC No. 35020537 after rigorous process of interview. Since then he had been working continuously since the date of appointment that is 19.11.2004 till 01.06.2009 when he was abruptly terminated from the service without giving any notice. He has also been subjected to examination of performance management system every six months after the date of appointment and was also subjected to training. He qualified all these examinations and training. It is noteworthy that the first party Reliance Communication Ltd. also issued him a certificate of appreciation of service. For all these5976 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] years of his service, he was appreciated as very good or commendable services but it is unfortunate that termination order was issued narrating the service as unsatisfactory. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of service.
2. It is further alleged that the action of termination of services of this workman is illegal, inoperative, bad in law on some of the grounds and reasons, as under:
a. It is mandatory and is a condition precedent for termination/retrenchment of workman that Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is followed. In this case Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is completely given a go by. Thus termination of workman is invalid and inoperative in the eyes of law workman continues to be in service, with all the consequential benefits.
b. Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is also grossly violated. Workman was terminated by pick and choose manner without going by "last come first go" principle. The workman submits that numbers of juniors to him are continued in service.
c. The reason of unsatisfactory performance given in termination order is totally false and fabricated. There is no material whatsoever to classify as unsatisfactory performance and to terminate the services in such capricious manner by "hire and fire" systems.
d. The workman submits that numbers of new persons are appointed for the same work which the workman was doing before termination of this services. Thus Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is violated.
e. No seniority list was published or informed to workman, which is necessary and mandatory under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act.
f. Workman has been terminated from services on the same day of the termination order i.e. service is terminated also contrary and in violation of the terms of appointment. Workman has not been given any notice or notice pay of any nature at the time of the termination or afterwards or till this time.
3. Thus in the light of the aforesaid averments, the workman has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
4. The first party/opposite party Reliance Communication Ltd. was issued notice and was represented by advocate Shri R.K. Shah and Shri R.K. Shah submitted the written statement Ex. 12 on 04.11.2011.
5. The second party workman submitted his affidavit cum examination in chief Ex. 10 on 16.07.2010 wherein the workman reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 5. But thereafter even filing the vakalatpatra Ex. 11 and written statement Ex. 12 on 04.11.2011 by the advocate Shri Rajiv K. Shah and also seeking adjournment Ex. 15 on 17.10.2013 for cross-examination, Shri Rajiv K. Shah advocate never appeared to cross-examine the workman on Ex. 10 on all the dates thereafter.
6. Thus on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit Ex. 10, it can be inferred that the service of the second party workman were illegally terminated without following the due process of law.
7. Thus on the basis of the aforesaid discussions, the reference is decided ex-parte on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit of the workman with the observation as under: the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Krishna Singhw.e.f. 01.06.2009 is illegal and unjustified."
8. The Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., is directed to reinstate the workman with immediate effect with continuity of service and back wages of lump-sum amount of Rs. 100000/-.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2041.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सकल
हेड-एचआर, रिलायंस कम्युनिकेशन लिमिटेड, आरडीएजी हाउस, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब(
नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय,
अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 05/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/91/2009-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5977
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2041.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 05/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Circle Head-HR, Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/91/2009-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 05/2010
1. The Circle Head – HR,
Reliance Communication Ltd., RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015
2. The Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd.,
RDAG House, B Wing, 4th Floor, Near Anand Nagar, Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380015 …First Party
V/s
Shri Jayantibhai S. Vankar, A-19, Kalptaru Park Millennium, Chandkheda Kalol Highway, Zundal, Gandhinagar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri R.K. Shah For the Second Party : Shri Anand B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/91/ 2009-IR(DU) dated 14.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Jayantibhai S. Vankar w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.12.2009. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 22.03.2010 alleging that he is duly qualified and experienced serviceman and was appointed on 07.05.2003 at Rajkot vide EC No. 35020179 after rigorous process of interview. Since then he had been working continuously since the date of appointment that is 07.05.2003 till 01.06.2009 when he was abruptly terminated from the service without giving any notice. He has also been subjected to examination of performance management system every six months after the date of appointment and was also subjected to training. He qualified all these examinations and training. It is noteworthy that the first party Reliance Communication Ltd. also issued him a certificate of appreciation of service. For all these years of his service, he was appreciated as very good or commendable services but it is5978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] unfortunate that termination order was issued narrating the service as unsatisfactory. Thus he has prayed for reinstatement of service.
2. It is further alleged that the action of termination of services of this workman is illegal, inoperative, bad in law on some of the grounds and reasons, as under:
a. It is mandatory and is a condition precedent for termination/retrenchment of workman that Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is followed. In this case Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is completely given a go by. Thus termination of workman is invalid and inoperative in the eyes of law workman continues to be in service, with all the consequential benefits.
b. Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is also grossly violated. Workman was terminated by pick and choose manner without going by "last come first go" principle. The workman submits that numbers of juniors to him are continued in service.
c. The reason of unsatisfactory performance given in termination order is totally false and fabricated. There is no material whatsoever to classify as unsatisfactory performance and to terminate the services in such capricious manner by "hire and fire" systems.
d. The workman submits that numbers of new persons are appointed for the same work which the workman was doing before termination of this services. Thus Section 25 (F) of Industrial Dispute Act is violated.
e. No seniority list was published or informed to workman, which is necessary and mandatory under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act.
f. Workman has been terminated from services on the same day of the termination order i.e. service is terminated also contrary and in violation of the terms of appointment. Workman has not been given any notice or notice pay of any nature at the time of the termination or afterwards or till this time.
3. Thus in the light of the aforesaid averments, the workman has prayed for reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
4. The first party/opposite party Reliance Communication Ltd. was issued notice and was represented by advocate Shri R.K. Shah and Shri R.K. Shah submitted the written statement Ex. 14 on 04.11.2011.
5. The second party workman submitted his affidavit cum examination in chief Ex. 10 on 16.07.2010 wherein the workman reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim Ex. 5 But thereafter even filing the vakalatpatra Ex. 13 and written statement Ex. 14 on 04.11.2011 by the advocate Shri Rajiv K. Shah and also seeking adjournment Ex. 17 on 17.10.2013 for cross-examination, Shri Rajiv K. Shah advocate never appeared to cross-examine the workman on Ex. 10 on all the dates thereafter.
6. Thus on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit Ex. 10, it can be inferred that the service of the second party workman were illegally terminated without following the due process of law.
7. Thus on the basis of the aforesaid discussions, the reference is decided ex-parte on the basis of the unrebutted affidavit of the workman with the observation as under: the action of the management of Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., in terminating the services of their workman Shri Jayantibhai S. Vankar w.e.f. 01.06.2009 is illegal and unjustified."
8. The Reliance Communication Ltd./Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., is directed to reinstate the workman with immediate effect with continuity of service and back wages of lump-sum amount of Rs. 100000/-.
9. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2042.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यक्ष
;एओसीद्ध, वायुसेना स्कूल, दर्जेपुरा, वडोदरा, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
73/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/18/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5979
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2042.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 73/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman (AOC), Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/18/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 73/2007
1. The Chairman (AOC),
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022
2. The Vice Principal,
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022 …First Party
V/s
Shri Prakashbhai Kantilal, R/o Post Amoliyara, Village Darjipura, Baroda (Gujarat) – 390022 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Raami For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-14012/18/ 2007-IR(DU) dated 13.08.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Prakashbhai Kantilal w.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 13.08.2007. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 9 on 29.01.2009 in Industrial Tribunal Central, Gujarat. Thereafter, the reference was received by transfer to this tribunal 19.10.2010. The first party Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara submitted the written statement Ex. 17 on 29.11.2011. Since then the second party has not been leading evidence despite issuing notice to the parties on 11.02.2011 to appear on 18.03.2011 but the second party did not prefer to appear for leading evidence despite giving last opportunity on 13.01.2016 to appear on 12.04.2016. Thereafter, half a dozen dates were also given to the second party to lead evidence but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman has not been willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Prakashbhai Kantilal w.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer5980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2043.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यक्ष
;एओसीद्ध, वायुसेना स्कूल, दर्जेपुरा, वडोदरा, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
75/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/16/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2043.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 75/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman (AOC), Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/16/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 75/2007
1. The Chairman (AOC),
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022
2. The Vice Principal,
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022 …First Party
V/s
Shri Mukeshbhai Girishbhai Vasava, R/o Post Amoliyara, Village Darjipura, Baroda (Gujarat) – 390022 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Raami For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-14012/16/ 2007-IR(DU) dated 13.08.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Mukeshbhai Girishbhai Vasava w.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5981 1. The reference dates back to 13.08.2007. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 29.01.2009 in Industrial Tribunal Central, Gujarat. Thereafter, the reference was received by transfer to this tribunal 19.10.2010. The first party Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara submitted the written statement Ex. 16 on 29.11.2011. Since then the second party has not been leading evidence despite issuing notice to the parties on 11.02.2011 to appear on 16.03.2011 but the second party did not prefer to appear for leading evidence despite giving last opportunity on 13.01.2016 to appear on 12.04.2016. Thereafter, half a dozen dates were also given to the second party to lead evidence but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman has not been willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is dispose of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Mukeshbhai Girishbhai Vasava w.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2044.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यक्ष
;एओसीद्ध, वायुसेना स्कूल, दर्जेपुरा, वडोदरा, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
76/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/15/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2044.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 76/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman (AOC), Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/15/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 76/2007
1. The Chairman (AOC),
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022
2. The Vice Principal,
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022 …First Party
V/s
Shri Babubhai Kalabhai Makwana, R/o Post Amoliyara, Village Darjipura, Baroda (Gujarat) – 390022 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Raami For the Second Party : None5982 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-14012/15/ 2007-IR(DU) dated 13.08.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Babubhai Kalabhai Makwana w.e.f. 11.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 13.08.2007. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 29.01.2009 in Industrial Tribunal Central, Gujarat. Thereafter, the reference was received by transfer to this tribunal on 19.10.2010. The first party Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara submitted the written statement Ex. 15 on 29.11.2011. Since then the second party has not been leading evidence despite issuing notice to the parties on 11.02.2011 to appear on 18.03.2011 but the second party did not prefer to appear for leading evidence despite giving last opportunity on 13.01.2016 to appear on 12.04.2016. Thereafter, half a dozen dates were also given to the second party to lead evidence but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman has not been willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is dispose of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Babubhai Kalabhai Makwana w.e.f. 11.01.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2045.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यक्ष
;एओसीद्ध, वायुसेना स्कूल, दर्जेपुरा, वडोदरा, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
77/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/14/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2045.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 77/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman (AOC), Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/14/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 77/2007
1. The Chairman (AOC),
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5983 2. The Vice Principal,
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022 …First Party
V/s
Shri Santosh Dev Ajit Dev, R/o H.No. D-257, Vraj Bhumi Society, Behind Yogeshwar Society Baroda (Gujarat) – 390022 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 14012/14/2007-IR(DU) dated 13.08.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Santosh Dev Ajit Dev w.e.f. 17.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 13.08.2007.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 29.01.2009 in Industrial Tribunal Central, Gujarat. Thereafter, the reference was received by transfer to this tribunal on 19.10.2010. The first party Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara submitted the written statement Ex. 15 on 29.11.2011. Since then the second party has not been leading evidence despite issuing notice to the parties on 11.02.2011 to appear on 18.03.2011 but the second party did not prefer to appear for leading evidence despite giving last opportunity on 13.01.2016 to appear on 12.04.2016. Thereafter, half a dozen dates were also given to the second party to lead evidence but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman has not been willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is dispose of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri Santosh Dev Ajit Dev w.e.f. 17.01.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2046.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार अध्यक्ष
;एओसीद्ध, वायुसेना स्कूल, दर्जेपुरा, वडोदरा, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
78/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-14012/13/2007-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2046.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 78/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Chairman (AOC), Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-14012/13/2007-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director5984 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 03rd August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 78/2007
1. The Chairman (AOC),
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022
2. The Vice Principal,
Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara (Gujarat) – 390022 …First Party
V/s
Shri Pravinbhai Kalabhai Makwana, R/o Post Amoliyara, Village Darjipura, Baroda (Gujarat) – 390022 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-14012/13/ 2007-IR(DU) dated 13.08.2007 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri PravinbhaiKalabhaiMakwanaw.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 13.08.2007.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 29.01.2009 in Industrial Tribunal Central, Gujarat. Thereafter, the reference was received by transfer to this tribunal on 19.10.2010. The first party Air Force School, Darjipura, Vadodara submitted the written statement Ex. 15 on 29.11.2011. Since then the second party has not been leading evidence despite issuing notice to the parties on 11.02.2011 to appear on 18.03.2011 but the second party did not prefer to appear for leading evidence despite giving last opportunity on 13.01.2016 to appear on 12.04.2016. Thereafter, half a dozen dates were also given to the second party to lead evidence but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman has not been willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is dispose of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Air Force School, Baroda in terminating the services of their workman Shri PravinbhaiKalabhaiMakwanaw.e.f. 16.01.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2047.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जिला
इंजीनियर टेलीपफोन, भारतीय डाक एवं टेलीग्रापफ विभाग, जामनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और
उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के
पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 601/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/185/93-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5985
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2047.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 601/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer Telephones, Indian Post & Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/185/93-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 601/2004
1. The District Engineer Telephones,
Indian Post and Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
Indian Post and Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees' Union, Baba Ama, 10/5, Junction Plot, Swami Tahiliaram Marg, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/185/93- IR(DU) dated 20.01.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones) Jamnagar and Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar in terminating the services of Shri M.D. Seerajudin is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 20.01.1995. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 5 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 19.07.1996. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 7 on 19.07.1996.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Therefore, on 21.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 22 was issued to the second party to appear on 21.04.2011 but to no result. Now today on 21.07.2017, the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
5986 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones) Jamnagar and Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar in terminating the services of Shri M.D. Seerajudin is proper, legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2048.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जिला
इंजीनियर टेलीपफोन, भारतीय डाक एवं टेलीग्रापफ विभाग, जामनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और
उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के
पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 606/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/193/93-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2048.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 606/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer Telephones, Indian Post & Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/193/93-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 606/2004
1. The District Engineer Telephones,
Indian Post and Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
Indian Post and Telegraphs Department, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees' Union, Baba Ama, 10/5, Junction Plot, Swami Tahiliaram Marg, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/193/93- IR(DU) dated 20.01.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5987SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones) Jamnagar and Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar in terminating the services of Shri Kishore Hira is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 20.01.1995. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 5 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 19.07.1996. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 18 on 18.03.1997.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Therefore, on 10.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 30 was issued to the second party to appear on 18.04.2011 but to no result. Now today on 21.07.2017, the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones) Jamnagar and Telecom District Engineer, Jamnagar in terminating the services of Shri Kishore Hira is proper, legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2049.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जिला
इंजीनियर टेलीपफोन, दूरसंचार विभाग, इंजीनियरग प्रभाग, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं
और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद
के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 622/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/136/93-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2049.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 622/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer Telephones, Telecom Department, Engineering Division, Surendranagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/136/93-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 622/2004
1. The District Engineer Telephones,
Telecom Department, Engineering Division, Surendranagar (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
Telecom Department, Surendranagar (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
5988 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]The President, Saurashtra Employees' Union, Umesh Commercial Complex, 213-214, 2nd Floor, Near Chaudhary School, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/136/93- IR(DU) dated 05.04.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of District Engineer/Telegraphs Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Patiram Lalleram is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 05.04.1995. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 7 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 04.09.1996 and 27.12.1996 respectively. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 12 on 10.03.1997.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Now today on 21.07.2017, the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of District Engineer/Telegraphs Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Patiram Lalleram is proper, legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 25 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2050.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जिला
इंजीनियर टेलीपफोन, दूरसंचार विभाग, इंजीनियरग प्रभाग, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद
के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1021/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/139/94-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 25th August, 2017
S.O. 2050.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1021/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer Telephones, Telecom Department, Engineering Division, Surendranagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/139/94-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5989
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1021/2004
1. The District Engineer Telephones,
Telecom Department, Engineering Division, Surendranagar (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
Telecom Department, Surendranagar (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees' Union, Baba Ama, 10/5, Junction Plot, Swami Tahiliaram Marg, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/139/94- IR(DU) dated 26.08.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of S.D.O., Telegraph, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Mohansingh Bhavsingh, Casual Labour is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 26.08.1996. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 2 on 22.09.1997. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 7 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 22.07.1998.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Therefore, on 02.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 13 was issued to the second party to appear on 13.04.2011 but to no result. Now today on 21.07.2017, the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of S.D.O., Telegraph, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Mohansingh Bhavsingh, Casual Labour is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2051.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बरसुआ
आयरन माइन्स, आरएमडी, सेल के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में
केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, भूवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 6/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय
सरकार को 25.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-26011/14/2003-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
राजेश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2051.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 6/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Bhubaneswar now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the5990 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] management of M/s. Barsua Iron Mines, RMD, SAIL and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 25.08.2017.
[No. L-26011/14/2003-IR (M)]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 6/2004
Date of Passing Award – 12th July, 2017
Between :
The General Manager, Barsua Iron Mines, RMD, SAIL, Po. Tensa, Dist. Sundargarh, Orissa
…1st Party-Management
(And)
The Secretary,
Rourkela Shramik Sangh,
BIM Branch, At./Po. Tensa,
Dist. Sundargarh, Orissa
…2nd Party-Union
Appearances :
M/s. B.B. Tripathy, Legal Assistant … For the 1st Party-Management None … For the 2nd Party-Union
AWARD
This award arises out of a reference made by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour vide its Letter No. L- 26011/14/2003-IR(M), dated 27.02.2004 in exercising its authority under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in the event of a dispute between the management of Barsua Iron Mines, RMD, SAIL and the Union and the schedule of reference runs as follows:-
"Whether the demand of the Rourkela Shramik Sangh, Barsua Branch, Po. Tensa, Dist. Sundargarh, for payment of full wages for suspension period i.e. from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 of Shri C.M. Nayak, Sr. Technician, Barsua Iron Mines of RMD, SAIL and promotion from S-7 to S-8 which was due to get from 31.12.2001 is justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?
2. Briefly stated the case of the 2nd party-Union as emerges from its statement of claim is that the disputant workman one Shri C.M. Nayak (herein-after referred to as the disputant-workman) while being in S-7 scale of pay was placed under suspension with effect from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 followed by a charge-sheet alleging that on 12.1.1998 during "C" shift he did not report to his duty and sat in the rest room situated adjoining to his shift office and exhibited insubordination or disobedience to his lawful superior authority and extended disorderly and indecent behaviour to them. A departmental enquiry was held against him and being found guilty for willful insubordination or disobedience, negligence of duty and exhibiting disorderly and indecent behaviour he was inflicted with minor penalties like suspension without wages for a period not exceeding four days. It is the claim of the 2nd party-Union that though the alleged incident of misconduct was taken place on 12.1.1998, the departmental enquiry was commenced on 19.3.1999 and it was completed on 16.5.2001. The punishment was awarded on 19.4.2003. The enquiry was not conducted in a transparent manner with conformity to the principles of natural justice and the finding of the enquiry committee was perverse and therefore, the punishment imposed on the disputant-workman was illegal and unwarranted. The promotion of the disputant-workman was due on 31.12.2001 from S-7 to S-8 scale under Non-executive promotion[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5991 policy of the 1st Party-Management. Due to such in-ordinate delay in completing the departmental proceeding the disputant-workman could not be promoted in time and his promotion was effected on 21.10.2003 which could have been effected much earlier provided the departmental enquiry was completed in a reasonable time. It is alleged by the Union that the Management deliberately and willfully delayed the completion of departmental enquiry in order to deprive the disputant-workman to get his promotion in time. Hence, prayer has been made for providing full wages to the disputant-workman during the period of his suspension i.e. from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 and his promotion from S- 7 to S-8 scale shall be given effect from 31.12.2001.
3. The 1st Party-Management has resisted the claim of the 2nd party-Union taking a stand that the allegation alleged by the 2nd party-Union in its statement of claim is not correct. The departmental proceeding was initiated against the disputant-workman for his misconduct and he was extended all opportunities to defend himself in the said enquiry. Having been found guilty of misconduct for his willful insubordination or disobedience, negligence of duty and for exhibiting disorder and indecent behaviour he was awarded minor punishment as stated earlier. The departmental enquiry was completed as expeditiously as possible and there was no fault on the part of the Management to delay the completion of the departmental enquiry. There was no malafide intention on the part of the Management to deprive the disputant-workman from getting his promotion in time. The disputant-workman was given promotion from S-7 to S-8 Scale on 23.10.2003 six months after his punishment in the departmental proceeding as the Certified Standing Order of the Management provides that in case of minor punishment in a departmental proceeding, the promotion of the employee/workman would be delayed for a period of six months from the date of the punishment in the departmental proceeding. The disputant-workman is not entitled to full wages for the period of his suspension because in the departmental proceeding the same was to be treated as such. The fairness of the departmental proceeding and its finding as well as the quantum of punishment having not been challenged as provided under the I.D. Act, there is no scope for the Tribunal to modify the punishment inflicted on the disputant-workman and extend any relief as put-forth by the 2nd party-Union.
4. On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties issues as shown below have been settled for just and proper adjudication of the dispute.
ISSUES
1. Whether the demand of the Rourkela Shramik Sangh, Barsua branch, Po. Tensa, Dist. Sundargarh, Barsua Branch, Po. Tena, Dist. Sundargarh for payment of full wages for suspension period i.e. from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 of Shri C.M. Nayak, Sr. Technician, Brasua Iron Mines of RMD, SAIL and promotion from S-7 to S-8 which was due to get from 31.12.2001 is justified?
2. If not, to what the workman is entitled?
5. The 1st Party-Management has only examined its Jr. Manager, (P & A) as M.W.-1 and filed documents like copy of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 16.12.1997, copy of the circular dated 2.1.1998, copy of the suspension order dated 13.1.1998, copy of the charge-sheet dated 17.1.1998, copy of the reply to the charge-sheet given by the workman, copy of the order of withdrawn of suspension dated 11.2.1998, copy of the order dated 13.2.1998 constituting enquiry committee, copy of the proceeding of the enquiry committee, copy of the findings of the enquiry officer, copy of the order of punishment dated 19.4.2003, copy of the circular dated 22.5.1974, copy of the promotion order dated 21.10.2003 and copy of the standing order of the Management which are marked from Ext.-A to N.
6. For the sake of convenience all issues are taken into consideration simultaneously.
Mere perusal of the schedule of the reference made by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour reveals that the 2nd party-Union has espoused a dispute on the action of the Management denying full wages to the 2nd party- workman during his suspension period i.e. 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 and denying to effect the promotion of the disputant- workman on the date from which he is entitled to get his promotion i.e. 13.12.2001. The reference neither discloses nor impliedly suggests that a dispute was raised by the 2nd party-Union challenging the fairness of the departmental enquiry or punishment awarded to the delinquent workman in the said departmental proceeding. The 2nd party-Union or the disputant-workman has not either insisted the Tribunal or the labour machinery for modification of the schedule of the reference to raise a dispute in the present reference on the fairness of the departmental enquiry as well as the findings of the enquiry and punishment given to the disputant-workman in the said departmental enquiry. Be that as it may, the Tribunal has no scope to examine whether the departmental enquiry initiated against the workman was conducted in a fair and proper manner with conformity to the principles of natural justice and provisions of the Standing Order of the 1st Party-Management. Law is well settled that Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court constituted under the Act is a creature of that statute. It acquires jurisdiction on the basis of reference made to it. Hence the Tribunal is to confine itself within the scope of the subject matter of the reference and cannot travel beyond the same. Further no issue has also been settled to examine the fairness of the departmental enquiry. Had there been any intention on the part of the labour machinery that the Tribunal to decide the fairness of the departmental enquiry initiated against the workman, the same could have been reflected in the terms and conditions of the reference i.e. the schedule of the reference. Similarly, the5992 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2nd party-Union or the disputant workman could have insisted to settle an issue in that regard for its determination and adjudication by the Tribunal. The parties have also not adduced any evidence in that regard providing a scope to the Tribunal to examine and opine whether the departmental enquiry held against the disputant-workman was conducted fairly and properly and punishment given to the workman was unwarranted. In the above back-drops and keeping in view the pleadings and evidence of the parties, it can be safely said that the disputant-workman was duly punished in a departmental enquiry for his misconduct. It is not seriously also disputed that the penalty inflicted on the disputant- workman was minor in nature as contemplated in clause-30 of the Standing Orders of the Management. Ext.-A which is the copy of the punishment order in the departmental proceeding clearly reveals that the disputant-workman was inflicted a punishment of four days suspension without any wages and his period of suspension from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 is to be treated as such without any prejudice to his past service for the period. The said punishment having yet to be dropped or withdrawn by any lawful authority appears to be a final conclusion. Further, the oral evidence of the Management as well as the Xerox copy of the circular marked as Ext.-L further reveals that if a non-executive employee is awarded a minor punishment as a disciplinary measure he is debarred from promotion for six months with effect from the date of the award of such punishment. Undisputedly, the disputant-workman was awarded the minor punishment with effect from 19.4.2003 for which his next promotion from scale of S-7 to S-8 was given effect from 21.10.2003.
7. Coming to the question of any illegality committed by the Management in denying full wages to the disputant workman for the period of his suspension and denying him promotion on the date on which it was due to the disputant- workman it can be stated here that no wrong or illegality seems to have been committed by the Management for with- holding the full wages to the workman for the period from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998. The full wage was with-held on account of the workman being found guilty and being penalized as such. Hence, the action of the Management for not providing full wages to the workman for the period from 13.1.1998 to 11.2.1998 cannot be said illegal and unjustified. So far, the promotion of the disputant-workman is concerned it is emerging from the given situation that the alleged misconduct was committed on 12.1.1998 whereas the departmental proceeding was commenced on 19.3.1999. The documents filed by the Management more particularly documents relating to the departmental proceeding against the disputant-workman reveal that the enquiry committee was constituted on 23.2.1998 and the committee held its first sitting on 19.3.1999 one year after its constitution and completed the enquiry on 29.5.2001 when the committee submitted its finding to the disciplinary authority. Though the report was submitted on 29.5.2001 the disciplinary authority awarded the punishment on 9.4.2003 as the same is apparent from Ext.-K. It is surprising as to why the disciplinary authority took two years to inflict the punishment though it is required that the disciplinary authority shall take decision as expeditiously as possible after submission of the enquiry report in the departmental proceeding. The promotion of the workman was due from 31.12.2001. Had the minor punishment was inflicted soon after the submission of the enquiry report on 29.5.2001, the disputant-workman could have been promoted to higher grade six months after passing of such award of punishment. It cannot also be over-sighted that the enquiry committee took two years to complete its enquiry proceeding and it also took one year to commence the enquiry proceeding. As such, there was also inordinate delay in completing the departmental enquiry. No reasonable explanation is either coming forth from the pleadings and evidence of the Management to hold that no latches were committed by the Management for delaying the disposal of the departmental enquiry. Though, the Standing Order of the Management provides no time limit for completion of such departmental enquiry against a workman or person of executive cadre, the settled principles require that such departmental proceeding shall be completed and disposed of as expeditiously as possible within a reasonable time. There is nothing on the record to suggest that there was any fault on the part of the disputant- workman to delay the completion of the enquiry. The alleged misconduct was taken place on 12.1.1998 whereas the promotion of the disputant-workman was due on 31.12.2001. Thus, it can be said that the Management had sufficient time to complete its departmental enquiry against the workman much before his due date of promotion. In absence of sufficient and coherent reason for delaying the completion of the enquiry, the allegation of the 2nd party-Union as well as the workman that the departmental proceeding was willfully and deliberately delayed to deprive him from promotion in time cannot be taken lightly. For the reasons discussed above I am of the view that had the departmental enquiry was completed at least before the due date of promotion of the disputant-workman, he could have been promoted from S-7 to S-8 cadre just six months after the due date of his promotion i.e. on 01.07.2002. Therefore, the action of the Management giving promotion to the disputant-workman with effect from 21.10.2003 is not legally justified.
8. In view of my discussions and findings above, the disputant workman is entitled to get his promotion from S-7 to S-8 with effect from 01.07.2002 and his pay and seniority in the promotional scale shall be fixed as per the rule with effect from that date.
9. The reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5993
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2052.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बॉम्बे इंटेलिजेंस सिक्यूरिटी ;आईद्ध लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 22/2002द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/72/2001-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
राजेश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2052.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 22/2002) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28.08.2017.
[No. L-30011/72/2001-IR (M)]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
Present : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/22 of 2002
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
(1) BOMBAY INTELLIGENCE SECURITY (I) LTD.
Managing Director,
Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd., 101, Swamilia Shah Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd., Garden Lane, Beh. Ashreya Cinema, Ghatkopar, Mumbai – 400 086.
(2) OIL & NATURAL CORPORATION LTD.
The Executive Director (MRBC), Vasudara Bhavan, Bandra [E], Mumbai – 400 051
…FIRST PARTY AND
THEIR WORKMEN
The Secretary, Transport & Dock Workers Union, P.D'Mellow Bhavan, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 038 …SECOND PARTY APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER : (1) Mr. A.K. Jalisatgi, Advocate
(2) Mr. G.D. Talreja, Representative
FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. A.M. Koyande, Advocate5994 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Mumbai, dated the 10th July, 2017
AWARD PART - II
1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-30011/72/2001 – IR (M) dated 09.10.2001. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :
"Whether the action of the Management of Bombay Industrial Security (I) Ltd., in removing Sh. Jagdish K. Gupta, Ex-Security Guard from the employment w.e.f. 22.9.2000 is legal and justified ? If not, what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
2. Statement of Claim is filed by the Secretary of the Union, i.e. Secretary of the Transport & Dock Workers Union at Exhibit 8 stating and contending that, it is a registered Trade Union registered under Indian Trade Union Act, 1926, having its office at P.D'Mellow Bhavan, P.D'Mellow Road, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 038. It is stated by the 2nd party Union that M/s. Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. 1st party (1), is having its office at 101, Swamilia Shah Co- op. Hsg. Society Ltd., Garden Lane, Beh. Ashreya Cinema, Ghatkopar, Mumbai – 400 086 is a Contractor of the 1st party (2) who is providing security guards to work in the various establishments of the ONGC at various places in the State of Maharashtra. It is contended by the 2nd party union that, the said ONGC, 1st party (2) is a corporate body controlled by the Government of India, through the Ministry of Petroleum having its Regional Office at Vasudara Bhavan, Bandra [E], Mumbai.
3. According to the union, Jagdish K. Tupta was appointed by the said employer before 15 years as security guard and he worked continuously in the establishment of 1st party (2) at Arcadia, Nariman Point, Mumbai. According to 2nd party union, it served strike notice and charter of demands regarding revision of wages of the contract workers working in the establishment of ONGC at various places in the State of Maharashtra. According to union, said strike notice and charter of demands was admitted in conciliation proceedings and conciliation proceedings started. It is stated that, as said Gupta is the representative of the union, the officers of the ONGC i.e. 1st party (2) and the employer jointly decided to penalize Gupta and to creat panic in the mind of the workers. According to Union, said Gupta was transferred from Arcadia to Bengal Chemicals. Gupta joined his duties at Bengal Chemicals but after few days, he was again transferred from Bengal Chemicals to the establishment of ONGC at Mallet Bunder without any reason. According to union, there is no provision for transfer of such employees. It is the case of the union, that the transfer by both the employers is illegal and is in contravention of the provisions under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. According to union, such transfers are made just to harass the workers. Gupta was served with the show cause notice dated 20.10.2000 which he replied categorically vide his letter dated 3.11.2000. It is stated by the union that, again union wrote to the Executive Director of ONGC vide letter dated 6.11.2000 and brought the contents of the said notice to his knowledge in which factual position was summarized and requested the officers of the ONGC to look into the welfare of the workers and did not harass the contract workers and transfer them. It is case of the union that, employers should not transfer their workers without any reason or without any provisions. So the union, pray that, since the concerned workman Gupta who was not allowed to report on duty with effect from 22.9.2000, be treated as termination and it pray that, the said be quashed and set aside with directions to 1st party to reinstate him with benefit of full back wages and continuity of service.
4. This is disputed by the 1st party (1) by filing written statement at Exhibit 10 stating and contenting that, Reference is not maintainable in law as well as on facts and as such it deserves to be dismissed. It is contended by the 1st party (1) that, there is no industrial dispute inexistence between the parties within the meaning of Section 2(k) or Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, employer has not terminated the services of the concerned workman Mr. Gupta. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, the concerned workman Gupta was re-deployed by the employer from one place to another. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, since the concerned workman did not report at the place where he was re-deployed, question of terminating him does not arise since he has not reported on duty. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, he has been deployed by Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. It is stated by the 1st party (1) that, there is no relationship that of 'employer' – 'employee' between the concerned workman and ONGC i.e. 1st party (2). It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, even no relief is sought by the union against 1st party (2) nor there is any averment in the Claim Statement that, he is employee of the ONGC i.e. 1st party (2).
5. According to 1st party (1) dispute raised by the union regarding transfer policy is illegal. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, there is no demand on the part of the union or workman that the alleged termination should be set aside and that, the concerned workman should be reinstated. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, however, in the subject- matter of the Reference Schedule of the Order is in respect of the alleged removal of the concerned workman from the services. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, in the absence of any such demand or complaint of the union or by the concerned workman regarding alleged termination, Reference does not survive and it is not legal and tenable. It is[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5995 denied that, he is purposely transferred from one place to another. It is denied that, the employee cannot be transferred as stated by the union. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, since the workman refused to report at transferred place, question does not arise to reinstate him. Even it is the case of the 1st party (1) that, the workman is still at liberty to report for work subject to the rights of the Employer to take disciplinary action against him as he remained unauthorisedly absent. It is the case of the 1st party (1) that, since he was not terminated the question of reinstating him and considering prayer of back wages does not arise. So it is prayed that, the prayer made by the union for the concerned workman be rejected.
6. Amended Claim Statement is filed by the 2nd party at Exhibit 13. Amended Written Statement is filed by the 1st party at Exhibit 15 stating that, amendment carried out is imaginary and does not have any force to consider it.
7. 1st party (2) filed written statement at Exhibit 31 stating and contending that, the Reference is not maintainable against it. It is stated that, it is not Employer of the concerned workman. It is stated that, there is no relationship of master and servant between the 1st party (2) and the concerned workman. It is the case of the 1st party (2) that, since no relief is sought against it, its name be deleted from the Reference. It is the case of the 1st party (2) that, since the concerned workman is contract employee and relief sought against Contractor, question does not arise to consider the ONGC as a party in the proceedings. So it is prayed that, the 1st party (2) be deleted from the Reference.
8. Even by application at Exhibit 32, 1st party (2) prayed for deletion of its name and disposal of the Reference against it which is replied by the 2nd party by filing reply at Exhibit 34 stating that, since 1st party (2) is the original Employer for concerned workman and 1st party (1) is supplying security services of the concerned workman it cannot be deleted from the Reference.
9. In view of Award Part – I, the reference as against 1st party (2) is not maintainable. In view of Award Part – I, the reference is maintainable against 1st party (1) and 1st party (1) is directed to attend the further hearing.
10. I have heard the arguments of both the sides. Following issues are framed at Ex.25. I reproduce the issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
| Sr. No. | Issues | Findings |
| 1 | Is reference suffering from mis-joinder of parties ? | As per order Award Part - I |
| 2. | Whether reference is maintainable ? | As per order Award Part – I |
| 3. | Does 1st party prove that 2nd party remained absent unauthorisedly ? | Yes |
| 4. | Does 2nd party prove that employee involved in the Reference is terminated ? | No |
| 5. | Does 2nd party entitled for relief as sought ? If yes, in what manner ? | No |
| 6. | What Order ? | As per final order |
REASONS
Issue Nos. 1 & 2
11. In view of Award Part I, it is held that the reference is not maintainable as against Party No.2 and the reference is suffering from mis-joinder of parties. Accordingly both these issues are answered in view of Award Part I.
Issue Nos. 3 & 4
12. So far contention go, it is the contention of the 2nd party union that there is no provision for transfer of the employee and therefore the transfer order issued by the 1st party thereby transferring Shri Jagdish Gupta from Arcadia to Bengal Chemicals is in contravention of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. As per pleadings in para 9(a) of the statement of claim workman was harassed by Respondent No.1, Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. by frequent transfers and even show-cause memo was issued alleging misconduct of the employees but then no enquiry was conducted and the Respondent No.1 did not allow concerned workman to joint his duty. The question is whether this action of 1st party No.2 amounts to termination of the concerned employee.
5996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]13. In view of the pleadings in para 9 of the statement of claim the union has said that it had lodged the complaint vide its letter dated 4.11.2000 bearing No. TD/ONGC-5/1700/2000 regarding breach of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In the said complaint the union has not challenged the alleged termination of service. Here it may be stated that 1st party No.1 is employing the employees such as security guards, supervisors, security officers, arm guards etc. to supply security to the customers as per their requirement. Even the service of security guards and security personnel are transferable and in that circumstances if the workman is re-posted at some other site as per the requirement of the employer then that may not amount to illegal termination if the employee on his own did not join the duties at the other site where he is re-posted. It appears from the pleadings that workman was posted by way of stop gap arrangement at Bengal Chemicals site and thereafter as per order of 22.9.2000 he was directed to report for work at Mallet Bunder site of ONGC. He did not report the said place and therefore show cause notice was issued to him asking him as to why the disciplinary action should not be taken against him. Thereafter reminder was also sent to him by letter dated 3.11.2000. In view of that if the workman has not reported for work from 23.9.2000 he is at liberty to report for work as per the said order.
14. Even otherwise it appears that the concerned workman has not adduced his oral evidence to show that he was willing to join the duties after receiving the transfer order. For want of evidence it will have to be said that the union has failed to establish that the services of the concerned workman came to be illegally terminated.
15. The Learned Counsel for the first party submitted that in view of Award Part I the reference as against the ONGC is rejected being not maintainable. Submission is to the effect that the first party Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. being the contractor of ONGC who is providing the security guards to work in the various establishments of ONGC at the various places in the State of Maharashtra is not under Central Government and therefore this tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference. In view of this submission also and for want of evidence, I find that 2nd party union has not proved the above issues hence above issues are answered accordingly.
Issue Nos. 5 & 6
16. In view of my findings to the above Issues, I find that the 2nd party workman is not entitled to any relief. Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
Date: 10.07.2017
M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 28 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2053.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बॉम्बे
इंटेलिजेंस सिक्यूरिटी ;आईद्ध लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद
में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय-2, मुम्बई के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 74/2003द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो
केन्द्रीय सरकार को 28.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/67/2003-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
राजेश कुमार, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 28th August, 2017
S.O. 2053.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 74/2003) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court-2, Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd. and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 28.08.2017.
[No. L-30011/67/2003-IR (M)]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5997ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
Present : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO. CGIT-2/74 of 2003
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BOMBAY INTELLIGENCE SECURITY (I) LTD.
The Personnel Manager, Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd., 9/3 A, Swami Lila Shah Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd., Garden Lane, Bh. Shreyas, Cinema, Ghatkopar, Mumbai – 400 086 …FIRST PARTY
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
The President, Transport & Dock Workers Union, P.D'Mellow Bhavan, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 038
…SECOND PARTY
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. A.K. Jalisatgi, Advocate FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. A.M. Koyande, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 25th July, 2017
AWARD PART - II
1. This is reference made by the Central Government in exercise of powers under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi vide its order No. L-30011/67/2003 – IR (M) dated 21.10.2003. The terms of reference given in the schedule are as follows :
"Whether the action of the Contractor M/s. Bombay Intelligence Security (I) Ltd., in removing from service Sh.
Janardhan Singh justified ? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled ?"
2. Statement of Claim is filed by the Secretary of the Union i.e. Secretary of the Transport & Dock Workers' Union at Exhibit 9 stating and contending that, the concerned workman Shri Janardhan Singh joined services of the 1st Party with effect from 27.9.1991 as a Security Guard. According to union, 1st Party is engaged in the business of providing security services to its customers on the contract basis. It is contended by the union that, 1st Party provides security personnel e.g. Security Guards, armed guards, supervisors etc. to its customers as per the requirements after entering into the contracts. According to union concerned workman was posted as Security Guard at ONGC's residential colony at Bandra Kurla Complex. It is stated that, on 18.10.1999 the concerned workman at about 3.20 hours was on duty. It is the case of the union that, though he was on duty and taking rest, Supervisor falsely informed that, the concerned workman was found sleeping on duty. It is contended that, accordingly charge sheet was served on the concerned workman and show-cause notice which was replied by the concerned workman. It is contended that, Inquiry Officer conducted the enquiry without following due process of law and without giving opportunity to the concerned workman to represent him. According to union the concerned workman who is almost illiterate participated in the enquiry. Even it is stated by the union that, the Defence Representative who appeared for the concerned workman was not acquitted with the enquiry proceedings. It is contended that, Inquiry Officer did not allow his Defence Representative to lead his defence and he did not consider the documents on record. Even it is alleged that, the concerned workman acknowledged the report dated 19.10.1999 where it was written, security guard found 'alter'. It is his contention that, it was then cancelled and introduced by word 'sleeping' which is fabricated just to harass the concerned workman. It is further alleged that, the enquiry officer did not appreciate the evidence on record and consider it while giving finding. It is contended that, the concerned workman is out of job from the date of his termination and is not in the employment. So it is prayed that, 1st party be directed to reinstate him with benefits of back wages and continuity of service.
3. This is disputed by the 1st party by filing written statement at Exhibit 11 stating and contending that, the enquiry was fair and proper. It is stated that, full opportunity was given to the concerned workman. It is stated that, concerned workman was found sleeping when officer of the 1st party Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma visited the place of work of the5998 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] concerned workman at 3.20 hours on 18.10.1999 when he was posted at residential colony at Bandra Kurla Complex. It is the case of the 1st party that, accordingly he submitted the report and action was taken by the Management after issuing show-notice and charge sheet. It is stated by the 1st party that, enquiry was conducted by giving full opportunity to the concerned workman. It is contended that, Inquiry Officer is totally outsider and independent Enquiry Officer who conducted enquiry by giving full opportunity to the concerned workman and submitted his report with details by giving all the facts and evidence placed before him. It is contended that, after giving full opportunity to the concerned workman finding was given by the Enquiry officer and opportunity was given to him. It is contended that, relying on that, action of termination was taken which is just and proper and does not require any interference. It is stated that, in case of Security Guard, if he is found sleeping while on duty it is a serious 'misconduct' which is committed by the concerned workman and for that he cannot be excused.
4. Rejoinder is filed by the 2nd party at Exhibit 13 stating and contending that, on the basis of the fabricated report of the Enquiry Officer d action was taken which is required to set aside.
5. Award Part – I has been passed by the tribunal on 5.8.2010. As per Award Part – I, it is held that enquiry was fair & proper and the findings are not perverse.
6. In view of that following issues arise for my consideration and my findings thereon for the reasons to follow are as follows:
| Issue No. | Issues | Findings |
| 3 | Is punishment proportionate ? | Yes |
| 4 | Is 2nd party is entitled to re-instatement ? | No |
| 5 | What order ? | As per final order |
REASONS
Issue No. 3 :
7. On going through Award Part-I, it appears that the aspect was also taken into consideration that the other persons who were also found with the concerned employee are kept in the employment of the 1st party. Then it was finding of fact that it cannot be ground to consider the case of the concerned workman and as such he has not led any evidence on the point to show biasness of the 1st party management in retaining another employee namely Shrivastav in service. It is thus finding of the fact that concerned employee being a security guard on duty was found sleeping on duty. Enquiry was held in that respect. The opportunity was given to him to defend himself. The enquiry was fair & proper and even findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse. Now the question creeps in as to whether in such circumstances the punishment that was imposed on concerned employee of dismissal from service is proportionate or not ?
8. Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that on 18.9.1999 the concerned workman was posted in second shift and continued in third shift due to shortage of guards & when 1st party Area officer visited the work spot at 3.25 a.m. on 19.10.1999 the workman along with Shrivastav was present but was sitting and resting. Area officer wrote in report that both were found alert but thereafter the word 'alert' was changed and wrote as 'sleeping'. Submission is to the effect that the cap and stick of the concerned workman was not confiscated as per the norms of security nor photographs were taken. According to the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman even the workman has stated in his reply to the charge sheet that he had to do double shift on that day and therefore he was resting and not sleeping. In view of this the submission is that the act of the concerned workman who was given double shift and therefore he was resting, cannot be a gross mis-conduct and therefore the punishment imposed upon him is dis- proportionate.
9. Learned Counsel for the concerned workman seeks to rely on the decision in case of Tata Engineering & Co. Comotive Co. Ltd. V/S. Jitendra Prasad Singh 2000 III CCR 853 to submit that when other two persons who were involved in the same instance were given lighter punishment, then the dismissal of the Respondent would amount to denial of justice as it would mean that he was singled out and therefore tribunal can interfere into the question of punishment
10. Here in the instant case the plea of the concerned workman that he was discriminated or singled out has already been considered and it is a finding of the fact that in the facts of this case that it cannot be a ground to consider the case[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 5999 of the concerned workman since there is no evidence of biasness on the part of party No.1 in retaining the services of another workman namely Shrivastav.
11. The enquiry was held to be fair & proper and findings are not perverse. On going through enquiry report at Pages 28 to 34 below Exhibit-17, it appears that the Inquiry Officer held that the concerned workman was found sleeping while on duty and this finding is based on evidence. This was considered to be a grave mis-conduct since the concerned workman was working as security guard and the act of sleeping on duty would amount to grave mis- conduct.
12. On going through the record, it appears to be the finding of the Enquiry Officer that sleeping while on duty particularly on the part of security personnel kept as custodian and proprietor is very serious act of mis-conduct. Once it is considered to be very serious mis-conduct on the part of concerned workman then it cannot be said that the punishment imposed on him is dis-proportionate.
13. In the decision in case of Bharat Coach Co. Ltd. V/S. Uttam Manohar Nakate 2005 (2 SSC 489) it is held that 'sleeping on duty amounts to serious misconduct.'. In para 28 of the said judgment it is observed that
"In case the employee found guilty cannot equated with a victim or scapegoat and a plea of victimization as a defence will fall flat. This is why once in the opinion of the tribunal a gross misconduct is established, as required, in legal evidence either in a fairly conducted domestic enquiry or before the tribunal on merits, plea of victimization will not carry the case of the employee any further. A proved misconduct is antithesis of victimization as understood in industrial relations. This is not to say that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to interfere with an order of dismissal on a proof of victimization and therefore it is obligatory on the part of Respondent to prove and plead the act of victimization."
14. In the instant case as seen earlier there is no evidence on the part of concerned employee to show the biasness of the 1st party or victimization. It is in that circumstances the submission of Learned Counsel for the 1st party is that once the labour court found that the charges were proved, it had no jurisdiction to interfere in the punishment imposed. In the context he seeks to rely on the decision in case of U.P. State Transport Corporation V/S. Mohanlal Gupta 2000 DGLS (SC 678).
15. As such the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman seeks to rely on the decision in case of State of U.P. & Ors. V/S. J.P. Sraswat 2011 (2 LLJ 625 SC) wherein it is held that interference is permissible in rare case of punishment being disproportionate to the charge established. In that case the concerned workman remained absent for long time. Enquiry was held and then punishment was imposed. In para 10 of the judgment it has been observed that
"punishment of termination of service that would not debar from future employment was perfectly reasonable and fair punishment and there was no occasion for the High Court to interfere with the order."
16. So far the facts of the present case are concerned, it appears that he was found sleeping on duty in respect which the enquiry was held and act of misconduct has been proved which was considered to a grave misconduct and ultimately the punishment if dismissal was imposed whereby he has been removed from the service w.e.f. 25.2.2000. Only plea that was raised by the concerned workman is in respect of victimization on the ground that other workman Shrivastav who was working as security guard was taken back in service and he has been singled out. But in this respect it was necessary for him to plead and prove the victimization and to adduce evidence in that respect. As said earlier he has not adduced evidence in respect of biasness of the employer and his victimization.
17. Victimization is a serious charge by the employee against the employer and therefore it must be properly and adequately pleaded by giving all particulars upon which the charge is based to enable the employer to fully made them. since that is not done it cannot be said that the concerned employee was victimized which can be a ground for awarding lesser punishment.
18. So far charge of sleeping on duty as security guard is held to be a grave misconduct and therefore it will have to be said that the punishment that has been imposed upon the concerned workman is proportionate. Issue No.3 therefore answered accordingly in the affirmative.
Issue Nos. 4 & 5 :
19. In view of my findings to the Issue No.3, the second party workman is not entitled to reinstatement. Thus the order.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
Date: 25.07.2017
M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer6000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2054.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंध्क,
दूरसंचार जिला, बीएसएनएल, भावनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच,
अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
96/2006द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/425/2001-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2054.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 96/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, Telecom District, BSNL, Bhavnagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/425/2001-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 10th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 96/2006
1. The General Manager,
Telecom District, BSNL, Panwadi, Bhavnagar (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, BSNL, Ghogha Road, Bhavnagar (Gujarat) – 346001
3. The General Manager,
Telecom District, Amreli,
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
BSNL, Telephone Exchange, Amreli …First Party
V/s
1. The President,
Shramik Sangh, Kaveri Corporation,' Navapura, Bhavnagar
2. The President,
Saurashtra Employees Union, City Shops, 3rd Floor, Opp. Jagnath Police Chowky, Dr. Yagnik Road, Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Shri N.H. Rathod[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6001
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/425/ 2001-IR(DU) dated 03.02.2006 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the Industrial Dispute raised by the President, Shramik Sangh, Bhavnagar against the management of General Manager, Telecom District, Bhavnagar and others over alleged illegal termination of services of 69 workmen as mentioned in Annexure – 1 is justified? If so, what relief the workmen are entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 03.02.2006. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 28.08.2008 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 10 on 06.08.2013.
2. Shri N.H. Rathod advocate moved an application Ex. 14 on 03.07.2017 alleging that the second party has not been in his contact. Therefore, he has retired from the case.
3. The advocate for the first party Shri Harish R. Raval moved an application Ex. 13 challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal on the ground that the reference does not show any cause of action. He was not terminated by the first party. He has come with the wrong facts and concealed the truth against which the second party workman has not filed any objection.
4. Thus the reference is disposed of as not pressed in the light of the preliminary objections Ex. 13 raised by the first party.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2055.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार उप
महाप्रबंध्क, पावर ग्रिड कॉर्पोरेशन ऑपफ इंडिया लिमिटेड, मानव संसाध्न विभाग, गांध्ीनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा
के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम
न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 116/2013द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42011/33/2013-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2055.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 116/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Dy. General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., HR Department, Gandhinagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-42011/33/2013-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 10th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 116/2013
1. The Dy. General Manager,
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., HR Department, 400/2000 KV Sub -Station,6002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Vasna Rathod Road, P.B. No. 9, Dehgam, Gandhinagar (Gujarat)– 382305
2. M/s Narendra Kumar and Co., A/52, Mahavir Society, Ranip, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Gujarat Navrachana Mazdoor Karmachari Panchayat, 9, Kabir Chambers, Off. Patelwadi, Bapunagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri Sunil S. Joshi For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 42011/33/2013-IR(DU) dated 07.06.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the union, Gujarat Navrachana Mazdoor Karmachari Panchayat, Ahmedabad to reinstate with full back wages of Shri Vakhaji Chhanaji Rathod and 3 others (terminated on 09.02.2012) in the establishment of the Dy. General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., Gandhinagar is justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 07.06.2013. Both the parties were issued notice but the second party despite submitting vakalatnama Ex. 4, did not prefer to submit the statement of claim. While the first party no. 2 moved an application requesting the second party to resume the duty w.e.f. 01.09.2014 but it is not clear as to whether the second party workman resume the duty or not.
2. Fresh notice Ex. 6 was issued to the second party to appear on 28.06.2016 but despite service, he did not appear in the tribunal and failed to submit the statement of claim. His advocate Shri Govindbhai Shreedutt informed the tribunal on 18.03.2017 that the second party has not been in his contact.
3. Thus in the absence of the statement of claim and the appearance of the second party, the reference is disposed of as not pressed.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2056.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार सीनियर पोस्ट
मास्टर, हेड पोस्ट ऑपिफस, राजकोट, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में
निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 618/2004द्ध को
प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/85/94-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2056.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 618/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Senior Post Master, Head Post Officer, Rajkot, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/85/94-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6003
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 28th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 618/2004
The Senior Post Master, Head Post Office, Rajkot (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Nalin R. Tank C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Division Chamber, Dhebar Road, Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.M. Rami
For the Second Party : Shri B.B. Gogia
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/85/94- IR(DU) dated 04/09.05.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Senior Post Master, Head Office, Rajkot in discontinuing/terminating/not taking on duty to Shri Nalin R. Tank Badli Postman (Outsider Postman) under Sr. Post Master, Rajkot is valid, justified and legal? If not to what benefits the workman/employee is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 04/09.05.1995. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 25.07.1995 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on 10.03.1997.
2. The second party workman in his statement of claim alleged that he was employed as Casual Labour/Outsider Postman from 01.01.1988 and worked up to 10.10.1990 and during the aforesaid period, he completed 240 days from 02.02.1989 to 31.01.1990 with total 592 days in the total aforesaid period but his services were terminated orally without serving any notice and paying notice pay, violating the provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He has also alleged that persons junior to him with lesser working days have been permitted to continue in service. He has been employed since then, therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service.
3. The first party in its written statement has submitted that he has not worked continuously for 240 days in any calendar year. He worked for 118 days in 1988, 223 days in 1989 and 185 days in 1990. It has also been submitted that in Para No. 6 of the judgement dated 02.02.1996 of the apex court in SLP(C) No. 17577 of 1995, Supreme Court has held that the department of post is not an industry. Thus the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act are not eligible. It has also been submitted that no person junior to the workman has been permitted to continue in service and as the workman has not completed 240 days in any calendar year, therefore, the provisions of Section 25 F of the Industrial Dispute Act are not violated.
4. The workman submitted his affidavit Ex. 29 on 08.01.2014 in support of his case wherein he reiterated the averments made in the statement of claim. But since then, the second party workman has not been appearing for cross- examination and the first party's advocate moved number of applications Ex. 30 to 33 to close the cross-examination of the second party workman.
5. Today on 28.07.2017, the second party workman and his advocate are also absent. Therefore, the affidavit of workman without cross-examination has no evidentiary value and is just a waste paper.
6004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]6. Thus in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, the relief sought cannot be granted.
7. Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence and cross-examination of the workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the Senior Post Master, Head Office, Rajkot in discontinuing/terminating/not taking on duty to Shri Nalin R. Tank Badli Postman (Outsider Postman) under Sr. Post Master, Rajkot is valid, justified and legal."
8. No relief can be granted.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2057.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार जिला
इंजीनियर, टेलीग्रापफ डी/ओ दूरसंचार, जामनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
985/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/152/94-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2057.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 985/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the District Engineer, Telegraphs D/o Telecommunication, Jamnagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/152/94-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 14th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 985/2004
1. The District Engineer,
Telegraphs D/o Telecommunication, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
2. The SDO,
Telegraphs D/o Telecommunication, Jamnagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employee's Union, Baba Ama, 10/5, Junction Plot, Swami Tahiliaram Marg, Rajkot – 36000
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6005
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/152/94- IR(DU) dated 27.10.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the erst while department of Telegraphs and now department of Telecom, through the Telecom District Manager, Jamnagar, in discontinuing/terminating or not taking on duties Shri Dinesh Bahadur Singh valid, just and legal? If not, to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 27.10.1995. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 26.06.1996 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 9 on 23.07.1996.
2. The second party workman submitted his affidavit Ex. 19 as his examination-in-chief on 07.10.2005. Since then he has been generally absent and failed to get him cross-examined despite giving number of opportunities to him. Therefore, on 21.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 23 was issued to the second party to appear on 09.05.2011 for his cross- examination on affidavit Ex. 19. Now the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the erst while department of Telegraphs and now department of Telecom, through the Telecom District Manager, Jamnagar, in discontinuing/terminating or not taking on duties Shri Dinesh Bahadur Singh is valid, just and legal."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2058.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार,
जिला प्रबंध्क, दूरसंचार विभाग, अमरेली, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
880/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/214/2001-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2058.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 880/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Amreli, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/214/2001-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 13th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 880/2004
6006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]1. The Telecom District Manager,
Telecom Deptt., Amreli (Gujarat)
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
BSNL, Telephone Exchange, Amreli (Gujarat) – 365601 …First Party
V/s
The Org. Secretary, The Association of Railway and Post Employees, 15, Shashi Apartment, Nr. Anjalee Cinema, Vasna Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380007 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri Nilesh K. Trivedi
For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 40012/214/2001-IR(DU) dated 19.11.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Telecom Department) in terminating the services of Shri Lalbabu Singh Shivlochan Singh is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to and what other directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 19.11.2001. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 22.01.2003 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 1 on 29.09.2003. Since then the second party workman has been absent and his advocate Shri Chintan Goyal, today on 13.07.2017, informs the tribunal that the workman is not traceable. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Telecom Department) in terminating the services of Shri Lalbabu Singh Shivlochan Singh is legal, proper and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2059.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार,
जिला प्रबंध्क, बीएसएनएल, दूरसंचार विभाग, अमरेली, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
889/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/234/2002-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2059.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 889/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Telecom District Manager, BSNL, Telecom Department, Amreli, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/234/2002-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6007
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 13th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 889/2004
The Telecom District Manager, BSNL, Telecom Deptt., Amreli (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Rajesh Dhanjibhai Bharad, Satyanarayan Society, Behind Hanumaan Para, Amreli (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri Nilesh K. Trivedi For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/234/ 2002-IR(DU) dated 04/07.04.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of BSNL in terminating Shri Rajesh Dhanjibhai Bharad, Casual Labour w.e.f. 12.08.1995 and despite reappointing him in December, 1995 terminating on 20.09.1996 is justified? While according to management recruitment of casual labour is banned after 1985, if not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 04/07.04.2003. The second party workman has submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 18.09.2003 along with the documents vide list Ex. 13 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 10 on 15.02.2004. Since then the second party has not been appearing and leading evidence. Therefore, on 30.01.2011, fresh notices were issued to both the parties to appear on 01.03.2011 but the second party refrained to appear. It is noteworthy that since last several dates, Shri Chintan Goyal advocate for the second party, was requesting for dates to contact the workman, now he says that he could not contact the workman.
2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of BSNL in terminating Shri Rajesh Dhanjibhai Bharad, Casual Labour w.e.f. 12.08.1995 and despite reappointing him in December, 1995 terminating on 20.09.1996 is justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2060.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार एसडीओ,
टेलीपफोन कार्यालय, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट
औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1029/2004द्ध को
प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40011/2/95-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक6008 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2060.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1029/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the S.D.O., Telephone Office, Surendranagar, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40011/2/95-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1029/2004
The S.D.O., Telephone Office, Surendranagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Association of Railway and Post Employees, 4, Allap Flats, Opp. Anjali Cinema, Vasna Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40011/2/95- IR(DU) dated 07.11.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of S.D.O., Phones, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Ranjitbhai A. Vania is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 07.11.1996. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 4 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 21.04.1998. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 6 on 21.04.1998.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Therefore, on 04.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 22 was issued to the second party to appear on 18.04.2011 but to no result.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of S.D.O., Phones, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Ranjitbhai A. Vania is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6009
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2061.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार उप-विभागीय
अध्किारी, दूरसंचार विभाग, ओल्ड टेलीपफोन एक्सचेंज, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके
कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट
;संदर्भ संख्या 1072/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/184/96-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2061.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1072/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Telecom Department, Old Telephone Exchange, Surendranagar, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/184/96-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 04th August, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1072/2004
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Telecom Deptt., Old Telephone Exchange, Near Head Post Office, Surandranagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees Union, Umesh Commercial Complex, Office No. 213 & 214, 2nd Floor, Nr. Chaudhary High School, Rajkot (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H. R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/184/96- IR(DU) dated 09.10.1997 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Telecom District Manager and Sub-Divisional Officer, Phones, Telecom Department, Surendranagar to discontinue/not to take on duties/discharge/terminate the services of Shri Dinesh Bhikhabhai Khavadia, Casual Labour w.e.f. 30.07.1988 is just, valid and legal? If not to what benefits the workman is entitled for and what directions are necessary in the matter?"6010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1. The reference dates back to 09.10.1997. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement on 05.12.1997 and 27.08.1998 respectively. Since then the second party workman has absent and has not been leading evidence. On 04.03.2011, all the parties were issued fresh notice to appear and submit their evidence but to no result. Thereafter, giving dozens of dates, the second party did not appear, therefore, on 17.02.2017, last opportunity to lead evidence in absence of the second party was given as a precaution but again to no result. Today on 04.08.2017, the advocate for the second party K.L. Kalwani, daughter of advocate Shri B.B. Gogia who is used to conduct his cases stated that the workman has not been in her contact and the case may be disposed of.
2. Therefore, in the absence of the evidence of the second party, the reference is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the Telecom District Manager and Sub-Divisional Officer, Phones, Telecom Department, Surendranagar to discontinue/not to take on duties/discharge/terminate the services of Shri Dinesh Bhikhabhai Khavadia, Casual Labour w.e.f. 30.07.1988 is just, valid and legal."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2062.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार,
जिला प्रबंध्क, दूरसंचार विभाग, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच,
अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
1109/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/82/97-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2062.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1109/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Surendranagar, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/82/97-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1109/2004
The Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Surendranagar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employees' Union, Umesh Commercial Complex, 213-214, 2nd Floor, Near Chaudhary School, Rajkot (Gujarat) – 360001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6011
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/82/97- IR(DU) dated 27.10.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Ramkrishna Bhansidhar Gupta is proper, legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 27.10.1998. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 6 of his advocate Shri B.B. Gogia on 03.08.1999. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on 28.09.1999.
2. Since then the second party has been generally absent. Therefore, on 04.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 17 was issued to the second party to appear on 18.04.2011 but to no result. Now today on 21.07.2017, the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Surendranagar in terminating the services of Shri Ramkrishna Bhansidhar Gupta is proper, legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2063.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार उप-विभागीय
अध्किारी ;पफोनद्ध, दूरसंचार विभाग, सुरेंद्रनगर, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
1113/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/92/98-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2063.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1113/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones), Telecom Department, Surendranagar, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/92/98-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 14th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1113/2004
1. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Phones),
Telecom Department,Surendranagar (Gujarat) – 3630016012 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. The Telecom District Engineer,
Telecom Department,Surendranagar (Gujarat) – 363001
3. The Asstt. Director Telecom (R & E),
O/o The General Manager, Telecom, Gujarat Circle,Ahmedabad (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
The President, Saurashtra Employee's Union, Umesh Commercial Complex, 2nd Floor, Office No. 213 and 214,Near Chaudhary High School, Rajkot – 360001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/92/98- IR(DU) dated 26.04.1999 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Phones, Surendranagar/Asstt. Director Telecom (R & E), Ahmedabad in terminating/discontinuing the services of Shri Dhanjibhai Bhanabhai Dhamel, workman is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 26.04.1999. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 17.04.2000 and the first party submitted the written statement on 31.07.2000. Since then the second party has been generally absent and has also not been leading evidence. Therefore, on 04.03.2011, the second party was issued notice to appear and lead his evidence on 18.04.2011. But even after a lapse of 6 years, the second party did not appear and also did not lead his evidence. The tribunal on 07.10.2016 gave a last opportunity to lead evidence by the second party inabsentia but to no result. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
2. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Phones, Surendranagar/Asstt. Director Telecom (R & E), Ahmedabad in terminating/discontinuing the services of Shri Dhanjibhai Bhanabhai Dhamel, workman is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2064.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार दूरसंचार
जिला प्रबंध्क, दूरसंचार विभाग, जूनागढ़ दूरसंचार जिला, जूनागढ़, गुजरात एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके
कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट
;संदर्भ संख्या 1160/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/223/2000-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2064.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1160/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Junagadh Telecom District, Junagadh, Gujarat and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/223/2000-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6013
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 20th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1160/2004
The Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Junagadh Telecom District, Gendagad Road, Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362001 …First Party
V/s
Shri Sureshchandra J. Verma, C/o Shri Krishna Prasad Verma, Telephone Exchange, Bilkha, Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Shri M.H. Sangrayat (Union Representative)
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/223/ 2000-IR(DU) dated 29.08.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Junagadh in terminating/discontinuing the services of Shri Sureshchandra J. Verma, Casual Labour, Kesodw.e.f. 11.08.1992 is just, valid and legal? If not, to what benefits the workman is entitled and what directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 29.08.2000. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 3 on 24.07.2001 alleging that he had been working as Casual Worker in the first party organisation since 02.11.1984. He was performing his duties with sincerity and to the full satisfaction of the first party organisation with a monthly wages of Rs. 1354/- per month but without disclosing the reasons; his services were terminated from 11.08.1992 without serving any notice and notice pay/retrenchment compensation. Therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with back wages with a payment of Rs. 5000/- as legal expenses.
2. The first party in his written statement submitted and denied all the averments made in the statement of claim stating that the second party workman Sureshchandra J. Verma has been working in the department since November, 1984 at Kasod. There is no dispute that he would not have completed 240 days in a year, therefore, temporary status was granted but during his aforesaid period, he committed misconduct while discharging his duties as Chowkidaar. On 29.02.1992, when he as a Casual Labour was on duty as Chowkidaar in the night of that day 87 G.I. Wires of 100 pound/4350 Kilograms were stolen by somebody due to the carelessness and negligence of the workman and he has admitted this fact in his reply, therefore, his services were terminated after giving him sufficient opportunities of hearing as per the principles of natural justice. Detailed disciplined inquiry was conducted by District Telecom Manager, Junagadh.
3. The second party was examined on 13.09.2005 and cross-examined on 26.03.2009 and 28.08.2009 and in his cross-examination; he has not denied that he was not given sufficient opportunities of hearing. Rather he has admitted all the documents of the first party regarding the inquiry, notice as mentioned in the written statement.
4. The record reveals that a FIR registered in to the said theft. He also admitted that the letter annexed with the written statement is in his hand writing wherein he admitted that the theft was committed.
6014 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]5. The legal heirs/widow of the workman moved an application Ex. 23 annexed with the documents informing that the second party workman was died on 22.01.2011. The said application was allowed. Both the parties closed their evidence and the second party workman admitted his misconduct leading to the termination of his service.
6. The advocate of the legal heirs of the second party workman submitted the written argument Ex. 27 referring the statement of claim that the second party workman joined his service on 02.11.1984. He was made permanent in the year 1989 as a watchman which he continued to work continuously till the date of termination of his service. His last drawn salary was Rs. 1354/- per month. His entire service record was clean and blotless but on 29.02.1992, some incident of theft was taken place in the office. The workman was not involved directly or indirectly in the event of theft but he was held guilty in the same without holding any departmental inquiry and was terminated on 11.08.1992. He referred to the written statement that his services was terminated for holding him guilty for the misconduct of negligence as a theft was committed on 29.02.1992 night in the office regarding the 100 pound G.I. Wires while he was performing his duty as Watchman.
7. The main argument of the second party's advocate is that no departmental inquiry was conducted into the misconduct of the workman by the first party employer and the employer has not tried to justify the order of termination by leading proper evidence. He has further argued that the workman has not admitted his guilt in the documents Ex. 13,14, 15 and 16. Thus the termination order is passed without following the principles of natural justice.
8. I perused the whole record. I would like to mention that paper no. 12/1 (Ex. 13) reveals that a FIR was registered in the police station into the theft committed on 29.02.1992 night and on the same day, the workman gave his statement in his own handwriting stating that he was on duty on 29.02.1992 night as a Chowkidaar when a theft of aforesaid articles being committed and the fact of theft came into his notice in the morning. This is very amazing that the workman who was performing the duty of Chowkidaar in the Telephone Depot and he becomes aware of the fact in the morning. Definitely the workman was negligent and when he himself has admitted his negligence in duty by way of his own handwritten statement, I don't think that any departmental inquiry was necessary to be conducted. Of course, he has not admitted the negligence in his handwritten statement but the statement speaks volume of his negligence in his duty. Thus the contention that the departmental inquiry was to be conducted and termination order ought to have been passed after the departmental inquiry has no force and fit to be rejected.
9. Therefore, the reference has no force and evidence of both the parties discloses that the termination was legal and just.
10. Therefore, the reference is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Telecom District Manager, Telecom Department, Junagadh in terminating/discontinuing the services of Shri Sureshchandra J. Verma, Casual Labour, Kesodw.e.f. 11.08.1992 is just, valid and legal".
11. No relief can be granted.
12. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2065.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार उप-विभागीय
अध्किारी, दूरसंचार, भुज, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में
निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1164/2004द्ध
को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/201/96-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2065.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1164/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Telecom, Bhuj, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/201/96-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6015
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 13th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1164/2004
1. The Sub-Divisional Officer,
Telecom, Bhuj (Gujarat) – 370001
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer,
Phones, Telecom, Bhuj (Gujarat) – 37000 …First Party
V/s
Shri Kedarnath Bhagat C/o The General Secretary, Western Railway Kamdar Sangh, T.D.Z. – 17, Gurunagar, Gandhidham (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : P.V. Kharsani For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/201/96- IR(DU) dated 16.01.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Bhuj in terminating the services of Shri Kedarnath Bhagat, Mazdoor under Sub-Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Bhujw.e.f. 30.04.1986 is just, proper and legal? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 16.01.2001. After service of the notice, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 17.10.2001 and the first party submitted the written statement on 05.08.2002. The second party workman was also examined on 09.03.2004. Later on 17.04.2009, the first party moved an application Ex. 21 for seeking permission to further cross-examine the second party workman and the court listed the application Ex. 21 for hearing. Butsince then the second party workman has not been appearing for filing objections against the application Ex. 21 and also for remaining evidence.
2. It is also noteworthy that despite long absence of the second party workman, the tribunal as a matter of caution, issued fresh notice to both the parties to appear on 13.04.2011 but the second party workman did not prefer to appear to participate in the proceedings. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Bhuj in terminating the services of Shri KedarnathBhagat, Mazdoor under Sub-Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Bhujw.e.f. 30.04.1986 is just, proper and legal."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2066.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार प्रबंध्क,
डीईटी सैटेलाइट ;एमटीसीईद्ध, न्यू टेलीकॉम बिल्डग, अहमदाबाद, गुजरात व अन्य एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और6016 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के
पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1416/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/7/94-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2066.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1416/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Manager, DET Satellite (MTCE), New Telecom Building, Ahmedabad, Gujarat & Others and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/7/94-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 14th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1416/2004
1. The Manager,
DET Satellite (MTCE), 5th Floor, New Telecom Building, Lal Darwaja, Madra, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
2. The Assistant Engineer, Satellite Earth Station, B. No. 45, Bhuj (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
Shri Firoj M., C/o M.V. Tak R.P., Camp Area, Bhuj (Gujarat) …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri N.K. Trivedi For the Second Party : Adv. K.L. Kalwani
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/7/94- IR(DU) dated 20.01.1995 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of DET Satellite (MTCE), Ahmedabad terminating the services of Shri Firoz M. Tank, Driver is legal, just and proper? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 20.01.1995.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 03.02.1995 and the first party submitted the written statement on 04.08.1996.
2. The examination-chief of the second party workman was recorded on 22.04.1998. Since then he has been generally absent. Therefore, on 21.03.2011, a fresh notice Ex. 34 was issued to the second party to appear on[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6017 20.04.2011 but to no result. Now the advocate for the second party Ms. K.L. Kalwani states that the second party workman has not been in her contact.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Therefore, the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of DET Satellite (MTCE), Ahmedabad terminating the services of Shri Firoz M. Tank, Driver is legal, just and proper."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2067.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंध्क,
बीएसएनएल, नई टेलीपफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डग, पालनपुर, बी.के. एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
1233/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/32/2003-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2067.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1233/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, BSNL, New Telephone Exchange Building, Palanpur, B.K. and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/32/2003-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 10th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1233/2004
The General Manager, BSNL, New Telephone Exchange Building, Jorawal Palace, Banaskantha, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …First Party
V/s
Shri Shaileshkumar L. Thakor, C/o Shramjivi Kamdar Sangh, Pitamber Mehta, Madh, Moti Bazar Road, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …Second Party
For the First Party : None For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 40012/32/2003-IR(DU) dated 31.07.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
6018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of BSNL, Palanpur not togive employment to Shri Shaileshkumar L. Thakor is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for and since when?"
1. The reference dates back to 31.07.2003.The second party did not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite knowledge of the reference. On 06.04.2017, a fresh notice was issued to both the parties. Again both the parties did not prefer to submit their statement of claim/written statement as the case may be.
2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim with the observation as under: "the action of the management of BSNL, Palanpur not to give employment to Shri Shaileshkumar L. Thakor is justified or legal."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2068.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार महाप्रबंध्क,
बीएसएनएल, नई टेलीपफोन एक्सचेंज बिल्डग, पालनपुर, बी.के. एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के
बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या
1234/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-40012/30/2003-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2068.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (CGITA No. 1234/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the General Manager, BSNL, New Telephone Exchange Building, Palanpur, B.K. and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 21.08.2017.
[No. L-40012/30/2003-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 10th July, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1234/2004
The General Manager, BSNL, New Telephone Exchange Building, Jorawal Palace, Banaskantha, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …First Party
V/s
Shri Jantiji B. Thakor, C/o Shramjivi Kamdar Sangh, Pitamber Mehta, Madh, Moti Bazar Road, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …Second Party
For the First Party : Shri G.R. Thaker For the Second Party : None[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6019
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 40012/30/2003-IR(DU) dated 31.07.2003 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of BSNL, Palanpur not togive employment to Shri Jantiji Bhikhaji Thakor is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for and since when?"
1. The reference dates back to 31.07.2003. The second party did not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite knowledge of the reference. On 06.04.2017, a fresh notice was issued to both the parties. Again both the parties did not prefer to submit their statement of claim/written statement as the case may be.
2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the case.
3. Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim with the observation as under: "the action of the management of BSNL, Palanpur not to give employment to Shri Jantiji Bhikhaji Thakor is justified or legal."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 29 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2069.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार आयुक्त,
दिल्ली नगर निगम, चांदनी चौक, दिल्ली एवं उनके कर्मचारी के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में
निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय सं. II, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 17/2013द्ध को
प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.07.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-42011/142/2012-आईआर ;डीयूद्ध]
राजेन्द्र जोशी, उप निदेशक
New Delhi, the 29th August, 2017
S.O. 2069.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (I.D. No. 17/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court N. II, Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Chandni Chowk, Delhi and their workman, which were received by the Central Government on 10.07.2017.
[No. L-42011/142/2012-IR (DU)]
RAJENDRA JOSHI, Dy. Director
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SH. HARBANSH KUMAR SAXENA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. II, KARKARDOOMA COURT COMPLEX, DELHI-110032
ID. No. 17/2013
Sh. Ashok Kumakr Tiwari, Delhi Municipal Workers Union, 4/7, Asaf Ali Road 1st Floor, New Delhi-110002.
Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Town Hall, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006.
6020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]AWARD
The Central Government in the Ministry of Labour vide Letter No.L-42011/142/2012-IR(DU) dated 25.02.2013 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication :-
"Whether the action of MCD in not regularization service of workman Sh. Chand Ram , Muster Roll Beldar w.e.f 1.04.2004 is fair and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for?
On 5.4.2013 reference was received in this Tribunal. Which was register as I.D No. 17/2013 and claimant was called upon to file claim statement with in fifteen days from date of service of notice. Which was required to be accompanied with relevant documents and list of witnesses.
On 29.04.2013 workman filed claim statement before this Tribunal. Where-in he prayed as follows:-
"It is most respectfully prayed that management of Municipal Corporation of Delhi may please be directed to regularize the services of workman Sh. Chand Ram S/o Sh. Surajmal with effect from 1.4.2004 and to pay arrears with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice."
After service of notice management filed written statement on 13.09.2013. Where-in management prayed as follows:-
"It is respectfully prayed that the claim of the workman may kindly be dismissed being false, frivolous, vexatious, misconceived and being devoid of any merit.
Against written statement workman filed rejoinder. Wherein he re-affirmed the contents of claim statement.
On 9.4.2015 following issues were framed:-
1. Whether action of MCD in not regularizing service of workman Sh. Chand Ram, Muster Roll Beldar w.e.f 01.04.2004 is fair and justified? If so its effect?
2. If workman is not entitled for regularization since 1.04.2004 then for what relief he is entitled to and from which date?
And 29.05.2015 was fixed for workman evidence. On 29.5.2015 workman filed his affidavit in his evidence.
Copy of which supplied to Ld. A/R for the management .
Fixed 20.07.2015 WW1 tendered his affidavit and 14.09.2015 was fixed for cross-examination of WW1.
Cross-examination of WW1 could be concluded on 21.03.2016. Then workman closed his remaining evidence and 2.5.2016 was fixed for management evidence.
But management filed affidavit of MW on 29.7.2016. Copy of which supplied to workman.
Fixed 22.8.2016 for tendering of affidavit and cross-examination of MW.
On 24.10.2016 MW1 tendered his affidavit. He was partly cross-examined. His further cross-examination is deferred to 12.01.2017.
He was further cross-examined on 12.1.2017 and his remaining cross-examination of MW1 deferred to 27.3.2017.
On 27.3.2017 MW1 was further cross-examined and his further cross-examination is deferred to 28.3.2017.
On 28.03.2017 MW1 was further cross-examined and his cross-examination was concluded.
On 1.05.2017 was fixed for argument. Parties may file written arguments also.
On 1.5.2017 workman filed written arguments. Copy of which supplied to management.
Fixed 8.5.2017 for reply by management to written arguments of workman.
On 8.5.2017 management filed written arguments copy of which supplied to workman. Who was permitted to file reply on 15.5.2017 .
On 15.5.2017 workman filed reply. Copy of which supplied to Ld.A/R for the management .
Then Award was reserved with liberty to Ld. A/R for the management to file reply if any.
No reply by management filed.
In the light of contentions and counter contentions I perused the pleadings and evidence of parties on record including written arguments of parties.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6021Which makes it crystal clear that in connection with the facts mentioned in paragraph 1 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management it is submitted that while dealing with Issue No.1 in the written arguments which were filed by workman in the court on 1.5.2015, various oral and documentary evidences produced in the case & Law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court were dealt with and it was established as under:-
(a) That action of MCD in not regularizing the workman Chand Ram Musterr Roll Beldar w.e.f. 1.4.2004 is neither fair nor justified.
(b) And that workman is entitled for reinstatement w.e.f. 15.10.1997 his date of termination on the basis of decision of High Court of Delhi and on the basis of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Director General, I.C.M.R. Vs Dr. D.K. Jain and Another as reported in [2007] 3 S.C.R. and that he is entitled for regularization as Beldar with effect from 1.4.2004 on the basis of Circular dated 2.2.05 of MCD Ex.WW1/2 (which has been admitted as genuine by MW1 in his cross examination).
This is proved from the following:-
(i) That for compliance with decision of High Court dated 17.9.2009 (certified copy Ex.WW1/1 page 11), workman was entitled for reinstatement & not for re-engagement as done by management.
Dictionary meaning of reinstatement is that workman should have been re-established in his former position i.e. workman should have been reinstated w.e.f. date of illegal termination in year 1997. From certified copy of award of Presiding Officer Labour Court (in brief POLC) Ex.WW1/10 page 3, it is proved that date of illegal termination of workman as per admission of management was 15.10.1997.
Management has not reinstated the workman as per direction of Delhi High Court w.e.f. his date of termination but has re-engaged the workman as fresh Beldar w.e.f. 7.5.2010 (as is evident from admission of MW1 in paragraph 6 of Ex.MW1/A & Office Order of MCD Ex.WW1/5). This conduct on part of management is not good.
(ii) That for compliance with Circular of MCD Ex.WW1/2, workman is entitled for regularization w.e.f. 1.4.2004 (as mentioned in reference U/s 10 of ID Act). Circular of MCD Ex.WW1/2 has been admitted as genuine by MW1 in his cross examination dated 28.3.2017.
2. That regarding contents of paragraph 2 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management, it is submitted that workman is not only entitled for regularization w.e.f. 1.4.2004 on the basis of Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi & Circular dated 2.2.05 of MCD Ex.WW1/2 (admitted as genuine by MW1 in his cross examination) but also on the basis of the following law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court:-
(i) As per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Director General, I.C.M.R. Vs Dr. D.K. Jain and Another as reported in [2007] 3 S.C.R. on pages 893 & 894 (Photo copy of citation was filed in court on 1.5.2017), whereby direction to grant reinstatement amounts to continuity of service.
(ii) As per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Others Vs Rajesh Kumar Gond as reported in (2014) SCC on page 588 & as shown in the highlighted portion (Photo copy of citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017), wherebywhen no material placed before Tribunal about functional distinction between posts (here in this case distinction between functions of Muster roll Beldars & regularized Beldar) order of Tribunal granting parity in pay on the basis of Equal Pay for Equal Work cannot be faulted.
(iii) As per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs The employees of M/s Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. and Others as reported in (1979) 2 SCC on page 85 (copy of citation filed in court on 1.5.2017) whenemployer has taken away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law such as by illegal /invalid termination as in this case, The relief of reinstatement with continuity of service can be granted.
3. (i) Management has misrepresented facts in paragraph 3 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management that that present dispute is not an Industrial Dispute because as law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bihar State Road Transport Corpn Vs. State of Bihar and others as reported in highlighted paragraph (E) on page 1218, when cause of employee is taken over and espoused by Union before conciliation officer, the dispute is an industrial dispute referable under section 10 (1) by State Government and reference is competent. Photo copy of this citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017.
(ii) Demand notices have been served upon the management and have been duly proved in the court vide Ex.WW1/8, Ex.WW1/9, Ex.WW1/12 & Ex.WW1/3, Ex.WW1/4 & Ex.WW1/A.
(iii) Management has misrepresented in this paragraph that reference has been made mechanically without due application of mind for which it has no locus standi because as law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bihar State Road Transport Corpn Vs. State of Bihar and others as reported in highlighted paragraph (E) on page 1218, when cause6022 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] of employee is taken over and espoused by Union before conciliation officer, the dispute is an industrial dispute referable under section 10 (1) by State Government and reference is competent.
(iv) Management has misrepresented in this paragraph that Delhi Municipal Worker's Union has no locus standi to raise the present dispute because as law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bihar State Road Transport Corpn Vs. State of Bihar and others as reported in highlighted paragraph (E) on page 1218, when cause of employee is taken over and espoused by Union before conciliation officer, the dispute is an industrial dispute referable under section 10 (1) by State Government andreference is competent.
(v) Facts of the case MCD Vs Gauri Shankar & Ors as referred by management & as reported in 1999 V AD (Delhi) on page 905 are quite different from the facts of present case and as such decision of this case is not applicable to the case of workman under consideration.
In the cited case Regularization of services of Respondent No.1 w.e.f. 1.4.89 was pending adjudication before the Industrial Tribunal but respondent workman was claiming regularization w.e.f. 25.10.83 i.e. from the date of his initial joiningand the Industrial Tribunal was also holding that workman was entitled to be regularized w.e.f. 25.10.83. But in the case under trial, workman is not claiming regularization from the date of his initial joining with management.
(vi) That study of contents of citation State of Karnataka & Ors Vs Uma Devi as reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 reveal that provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and the powers of the Industrial and Labour Courts provided therein were not at all under consideration in Umadevi case. The issue pertaining to unfair labour practice was neither the subject matter for decision nor was it decided in Umadevi case.
Industrial Disputes Act is made for settlement of industrial disputes and for certain other purposes as mentioned therein. It prohibits unfair labour practice on the part of employer in engaging employees as casual or temporary employees for a long period without giving them the status and privileges of permanent employees as is evident from the Fifth Schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. These facts are also proved from highlighted portions of paragraphs 17 and 18 on page 329 of Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajaypal Singh Vs Haryana Warehousing Corporation as reported in (2015) 6 SCC 329.
In view of above mentioned facts, it is proved that Law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka & Ors Vs Uma Devi as reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 is not applicable to the case of workman under trial.
(vii) Facts of the case Uma Rani Vs Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others as reported in (2004) 7 SCC in highlighted paragraph A on page 112 & highlighted paragraph B on page 113 are quite different from the facts of present case under trial and as such decision of this case is not applicable to the case of workman under consideration.
In the cited case appointments were made in contravention of mandatory provisions of the Act and statutory rules framed there under and State could not could issue order of regularization under Ss 170 & 182 of T.N. Cooperative Societies Act 1983 or under T.N. Industrial Establishments Act 1981.
T.N. Cooperative Societies Act 1983 did not empower Govt. to issue order directing regularization of services of employees of cooperative societies who had been appointed in flagrant violation of the mandatory provisions of the Act and the Rules.
But facts of the case under trial are quite different. Here workman is seeking reinstatement and regularization w.e.f. 1.4.2004 on basis of decision of High Court of Delhi Ex.WW1/1 and on the basis of order of MCD Ex.WW1/2.
4. That in connection with the facts mentioned in paragraph 4 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management it is submitted that workman has also claimed regularization in paragraph 5 of Replication to the amended written statement stating that muster roll employees who joined MCD in August 1996 after date of engagement of workman have been regularized but the workman has not been regularized. Workman has also mentioned the law laid down by Supreme Court in M/s Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs The employees of M/s Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. and Others as reported in (1979) 2 SCC on page 85 on the basis of which he was seeking regularization.
5. That contents of paragraph 5 of submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management need no reply as these pertain to issues framed by Hon'ble Court.
6. That in connection with the facts mentioned in paragraph 6 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management it is clarified that workman has filed in the court certified copies of following documents perusal of Hon'ble Court:-
(i) Certified copy of Decision of High Court dated 17.9.2009 as Ex.WW1/1 (11 pages).
(ii) Certified copy of award dated 8.4.2004 passed by Presiding Officer Labour Court as Ex.WW1/10 (3 pages).
(iii) Certified copy of Order dated 17.9.2009 of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as Ex.WW1/11 (2 pages).
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 60237. That contents of paragraph 7 of submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management reveal that management had filed writ petition in High Court in year 2016 but the same has been suppressed from the Hon'ble Court for more than five months & has been revealed only at the stage of final arguments on 8.5.2017 so as to delay the process of justice intentionally & malafidely.Management is knowing well that regularization of workman has already been delayed due to fault of management from 1.4.2004 to 15.5.2017 that is for a period of about eleven years.
8. That contents of paragraph 8 of submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management need no reply in view of written arguments dated 1.5.2017 of workman & in view of written submissions dated 15.5.2017 of the workman which has also been filed in the court.
9. (a) That in connection with the facts mentioned in paragraph 9 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management that claimant has never worked with management even for a single day for the period from 16.10.1997 to 6.5.2010 and as such claimant cannot be equated with those employees who had worked regularly on muster roll daily wage basis with the management. For this act the workman is not at fault. It is only the management who is at fault in this respect. This is proved from the following evidences:-
(i) As per paragraph 10 of Certified Copy of Award of Labour Court dated 8.4.2004 Ex.WW1/10 Page 3 as reproduced below:-
"10 ISSUE NO.2
The management had taken the defence that the workman was engaged for a specific period and purely as daily wager on muster roll from 15.8.1996 and he was disengaged on 15.10.97 after the specific period was over. To substantiate this no evidence has been led by the management. This conduct does not hold good. Admittedly, the workman worked for a period of more than 240 days in a last 12 months and so his removal from service without complying with the provisions contained under Section 25 F of I.D. Act is illegal and unjustified. The order of retrenchment is bad as no notice has been issued to the workman nor any retrenchment compensation has been paid."
(ii) As per paragraph 11 of Certified Copy of Award of Labour Court dated 8.4.2004 Ex.WW1/10 Page 3 as reproduced below:-
"11. In view of my above discussion, I hold that the services of the workman have been terminated illegally and unjustifiably by the management. ……....…………………"
(iii) As per last 7 lines of Certified copy of Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi dated 17.9.2009 Ex.WW1/1 Page 11:-
"……………..It is clearly seen from the record that the proceedings were delayed only on account of the management. Themanagement, in spite of giving several opportunities, has not led any evidence in the matter. In these circumstances, the refusal to grant reinstatement was not proper. In the result, the appeal is allowed. The award of the labour Court is modified to the extent that the appellant will be entitled to reinstatement in service with 50 % back wages."
(iv) That as per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Director General, I.C.M.R. Vs Dr. D.K. Jain and Another as reported in [2007] 3 S.C.R. in highlighted portions marked 'H' on page 893 & marked 'A' on page 894, the direction to grant reinstatement amounts to continuity of service.
This citation was filed in the court on 1.5.2017.
(v) As per admission of MW1 in last four lines of paragraph number 4 on page 3 of Ex.MW1/A:-
"………………….It is a fact that the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has not given any benefit of continuity of service or seniority to the claimant."
The facts mentioned in paragraphs 9(a)(i) to 9(a)(v) above prove that delay in regularization of workman for a period of 11 years is due to fault of management & this delay is not due to fault of workman.
(b) That relevant to the remaining facts mentioned in paragraph 9 of written submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management that claimant will be considered for regularization only when other employees engaged on muster roll basis w.e.f. 7.5.2010 are considered for regularization (& that Claimant has not cross examined MW1 on these facts), the relevant evidences are as under:-
(i) That as per cross examination dated 24.10.2010 of MW1:-
Question : Are the duties and functions of Muster Roll Beldars and regularized Beldars identical.
Ans : The duties of Muster Roll & regular Beldars are no where specified. This is the organisation of 24x7 working & the Beldars /staff engaged had to work according to the work requirement by the mgmt.
6024 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](ii) As per cross examination dated 12.1.2017 of MW1:-
"It is correct regular Beldars are getting more salary and allowances than daily wage Muster Roll Beldars."
(iii) Reply to suggestion as given by MW1 on page 2 of cross examination dated 28.3.2017:-
"It is incorrect to suggest that on the Principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' the workman is entitled for regularization w.e.f. 1.4.2004."
(iv) That as per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Others Vs Rajesh Kumar Gond as reported in (2014) 13 SCC on page 588, When two posts in question cannot be equated but when no material was placed before Tribunal about functional distinction, order of Tribunal granting parity in pay on the principle of Equal pay for equal work cannot be faulted. Photo copy of this citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017.
(v) That other facts relevant to this have also been dealt with & argued in Issue no.2 of written arguments filed by workman in the court on 1.5.2017.
The facts mentioned in paragraphs 9(b)(i) to 9(b)(v) above and the laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India and Others Vs Rajesh Kumar Gond as reported in (2014) 13 SCC on page 588 also prove that workman is also entitled for regularization w.e.f. 7.5.2010 (his date of re-engagement) on the Principle of 'Equal pay for Equal work'.
10. That contents of paragraph 10 of submissions dated 8.5.2017 of management need no reply in view of submissions made in preceding paragraphs 1 to 9 above of written submissions (dated 15.5.2010) of the workman & written arguments dated 1.5.2017 of the workman.
11. That study of contents of citation Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors Vs Uma Devi as reported in III (2006)SLT 539 reveal that provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and the powers of the Industrial and Labour Courts provided therein were not at all under consideration in this case. The issue pertaining to unfair labour practice was neither the subject matter for decision nor was it decided in this case. Photo copy of citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017.
Industrial Disputes Act is made for settlement of industrial disputes and for other purposes as mentioned therein. It prohibits unfair labour practice on the part of employer in engaging employees as casual or temporary employees for a long period without giving them the status and privileges of permanent employees as is evident from the Fifth Schedule of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. These facts are also proved from highlighted portions of paragraph 18 on page 329 of Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajaypal Singh Vs Haryana Warehousing Corporation as reported in (2015) 6 SCC 329.
In view of the above mentioned facts, it is proved that Law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors Vs Uma Devi as reported in III (2006)SLT 539 is not applicable to the case of workman under trial.
12. That the facts of the case MCD Vs Presiding Officer, IT– II & Ors as reported in 2000 II AD (Delhi) 442 which have been highlighted on page 443 are different from the facts of case under trial and as such decision of this case is not applicable to the case of workman under trial. Photo copy of citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017.
In cited case award of Industrial Tribunal was not sustained because it was held in the award that daily wage/ casual/ muster roll mates working in MCD are entitled to pay /allowances in regular pay scale from the date of their respective initial appointment as has been enjoyed by regularly recruited mates.
But in case under trial, workman is not asking for his regularization w.e.f. 15.8.1996 his date of his initial appointment. But in this case workman is asking for his regularization w.e.f. 1.4.2004 on the basis of order of Double Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi Ex.WW1/1 (page 11) and on the basis of circular of MCD Ex.WW1/2 which has been admitted as genuine by MW1 in his cross examination dated 28.3.2017.
Contents of paragraph 12 of written submission show that management has misrepresented true facts of the case & suppressed the essential facts of case which were in favour of workman.
13. That the facts of the case State of Haryana Vs Jasmer Singh & Ors AIR 1997 SC 1788 as mentioned in highlighted portion on page 1788 are different from the facts of case under trial and as such decision of this case is not applicable to the case of workman under trial. Photo copy of citation has been filed in court on 15.5.2017.
In the cited case duties and functions of regular employees were different from the duties and functions of daily wagers as is evident from the highlighted portion of citation on page 1788.
But in the case under trial duties, functions and working hours of regularized Beldar and muster roll Beldars have been admitted as identical by MW1 in his cross examination dated 24.10.2010.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 602514. That Authorized Representative (in brief AR) of management has falsely and malafidely stated in paragraph 14 of written submissions that judgments cited by AR of claimant are not applicable because he has not mentioned any fact, circumstance and reason due to which citations of AR of workman are neither applicable nor reliable.
FINDINGS ON ISSUE NO. 1
In this back ground Issue No. 1 is liable to be decided against management and in favour of workman due to want of required and reliable and credible evidence of management and adequate, reliable and credible evidence of workman Sh. Chand Ram. Which is accordingly decided.
FINDINGS ON ISSUE NO.2.
Issue no. 2 is relating to relief of workman.
As issue No. 1 has already been decided against management of M.C.D and in favour of workman sh. Chand Ram , Mustrol Beldar w.e.f. 1.04.2004 conduct of management of M.C.D was not found fair and justified. While disposing of issue no. 1 by me.
Hence workman Sh. Chand Ram, Mustrol Beldar is entitled for regularization of his service since 1.04.2004.
In these background reference is also liable to be decided in favour of workman and against management of M.C.D.
Which is accordingly decided and claim statement is allowed.
Award is accordingly passed.
Dated:-14.06.2017
HARBANSH KUMAR SAXENA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2070.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार इंडियन बैंक के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, चैन्नई के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 67/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31.08.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12011/22/2015-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, डेस्क अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2017
S.O. 2070.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2015) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Indian Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31.08.2017.
[No. L-12011/22/2015-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
CHENNAI
Friday, the 21st July, 2017
Present : K.P. PRASANNA KUMARI, Presiding Officer
Industrial Dispute No. 67/2015
[In the matter of the dispute for adjudication under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), between the Management of Indian Bank and their workman]6026 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
BETWEEN :
: 1st Party/Petitioner Union
The President Indian Bank Employees Federation(BEFI) No. 302A, ACRUX Gokul Plaza Cuttack Road Bhubaneshwar – 751006 (Orissa)
AND
The Chairman & Managing Director : 2nd Party/Respondent Indian Bank Corporate Office 250-260 Avvai Shanmugham Salai Chennai-600014
Appearance :
For the 1st Party/Petitioner Union : M/s. Balan Haridas, Advocates For the 2nd Party/Respondent : M/s. Aiyar & Dolia, Advocates
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-12011/22/2015-IR (B.II) dated 13.05.2015 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
"Whether the action of the Management of Indian Bank, Chennai regarding not considering the Charter of
Demands placed by the Petitioner Union vide strike notice dated 28.06.2012 is justifiable or not? If not so to
what relief the Petitioner Union is entitled?"
2. On receipt of the Industrial Dispute this Tribunal has numbered it as ID 67/2015 and issued notice to both sides. Both parties have entered appearance through their counsel and filed Claim and Counter Statements respectively. The petitioner has filed rejoinder in answer to the Counter Statement.
3. The averments in the Claim Statement filed by the petitioner in brief are these:
The petitioner is an All India Federation of State Level Unions which are registered under Trade Union Act in the respective States. The Unions affiliated to the federation are representing around 3500 employees of the Indian Bank as its members. The petitioner is espousing the genuine grievances of the employees of the Respondent Bank. The petitioner used to be invited regularly by the Respondent for discussion on various issues pertaining to the employees. However, in the year 2000 the Respondent stopped discussion with the petitioner. The petitioner had been insisting the Respondent to consider the Charter of Demands submitted by it. It had agitated peacefully on 02.09.2011 and 16.03.2012. Since the Respondent did not accede to the demand, the petitioner issued strike notice on 28.06.2012 to go on strike on 20.07.2012. The Assistant Labour Commissioner had intervened in the matter but the conciliation efforts ended in failure. The petitioner had raised 24 demands in the Charter of Demands. However, the petitioner is pressing only those demands which are being referred to in the Claim Statement. The Management had not been recruiting sufficient number of Clerks for the establishment. It was not regularizing the services of temporary sub-staffs, sweepers, drivers and canteen employees. It did not consider the demand for overtime wages also. The temporary sub-staff are to be paid in accordance with the circular dated 04.03.1983. However, the Respondent had been paying only a paltry amount as wages. The temporary sub-staff are performing all the duties done by a regular sub- staff. Due to non-availability of permanent sub-staff the temporary sub-staff are made to accompany the Clerks for cash remittance, in violation of laid down norms. They are made to sweep and clean the premises also, in the absence of sweepers in the branches. There was no recruitment to the cadre of sub-staff for more than 15 years. The number of branches have increased while the strength of permanent sub-staff in the establishment has decreased. Most of the temporary sub-staff have worked for several years. Keeping them as temporary employees is unfair labour practice. All of them have worked for more than 480 days continuously within a period of 24 calendar months. Even the vacancies of sub-staff cadre that had arisen on promotion of regular sub-staff to the Clerical Cadre have not been filled-up. The total number of sub-staff required to run the establishment is 4619 while the actual strength of the sub-staff is 1499 out of which 333 are drivers and armed guards. More than 3000 temporary sub-staffs are engaged all over India. Their services should be regularized. There are temporary sweepers engaged in permanent vacancies for a long time. Their services also should be regularized. Canteens are run by the Respondent providing premises, fuel, utensils and other facilities. The Canteen functions only on days when the Bank is functioning. The canteen employees are under the[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6027 direct control and supervision of the Respondent Bank. In West Bengal the Respondent Bank absorbed all the canteen employees as sub-staff. The canteen employees should be absorbed in the establishment. The Executives of the Bank are employing personal drivers and the Bank is paying consolidated monthly salary to these drivers through the Executives. Such drivers were regularized in the service of the Bank as permanent drivers in the past. There are several vacancies in the post of drivers in the Bank. The personnel drivers are to be appointed as permanent drivers of the bank. 25% of the vacancies in the sub-staff cadre have to be filled up by way of promotion from among the permanent part- time sweepers as per Government of India guidelines. The vacancies for sub-staff in the bank are more than 3,453. The total number of Sweepers is only 625. All the part-time sweepers are to be promoted as sub-staff. Whenever vacancy arises in a higher scale in the branch the permanent part-time sweepers drawing lower-scale wages in the area shall be posted to higher scale branches. Graduated part-time sweepers are to be promoted to the Clerical Cadre. Sufficient number of armed guards should be recruited. The periodical transfer policy in respect of the Clerical Staff should be scrapped keeping intact the request transfer policy. There is acute shortage of Clerks in the establishment. Sufficient number of Clerks should be recruited. Annual incentive should be paid to the entire workforce rather than a selected few. There should be a direction to pay actual cost of 50 litres of petrol for the revenue expenditure. Canteen subsidy now paid at the rate of Rs. 10/- per working day should be increased to Rs. 25/- per day. Overtime wages should be paid for the work done beyond the prescribed working hours. Risk premium part of GSLI Insurance Scheme should be borne by the Bank. The Bank is prohibited from outsourcing the Core Banking activities as per Industry Level Settlement. The outsourcing carried out in spite of the settlement should be put an end to. The discrimination in the matter of punishment should be removed. The welfare measures of the staff should be improved. The petitioner is not pressing other demands mentioned in the strike notice. An Award may be passed holding that the demands pressed by the petitioner are just and proper and also directing the Respondent to comply with the demands and extend the benefit to the employees.
4. The Respondent has filed Counter Statement contending as below:
The allegations made in the strike notice dated 28.06.2012 are denied. There can only be conciliation and not adjudication over a strike notice. As per the settlement only the recognized union will act as a bargaining agent for the employees. The settlement entered into with the recognized union shall be binding on all the employees irrespective of their membership in the unions. The Charter of Demands made by the petitioner in the strike notice dated 28.06.2012 have been discussed and resolved with the Indian Bank Employees Union which is the recognized union as similar demands were raised in that union's strike notice dated 26.03.2012. It is not proper on the part of the Petitioner Union to raise the dispute based on the same demands. The petitioner has no locus-standi to raise the demands as similar demands were already discussed with the recognized union. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief.
5. The petitioner has filed rejoinder denying the allegations made in the Counter Statement
6. Out of the 24 demands that were raised in the Charter of Demands attached to the strike notice dated 28.06.2012 the petitioner had given up 7 demands even while filing the Claim Statement. During the stage of argument the petitioner has filed a memo stating that it is pressing only the following demands :
Demand No. 2 – Annual Incentive to all
Demand No. 5 – Recruitment in Clerical and Subordinate Cadre including Armed Guards
Demand No. 6 – Increase in reimbursement of fuel expenses to Award Staff from 5 litres to 15 litres of Petrol.
Demand No. 8 – Regularization of temporary employees and canteen employees in the Bank service
Demand No. 9 – Filling up of Sweeper vacancies
Demand No. 11 – Promotion of Part-Time Sweeper as Sub-Staff
Demand No. 14 – Canteen subsidy to be increased to Rs. 25/- per day.
Demand No. 21 – Risk premium for GSLI Scheme to be borne by the Bank.
7. Thus now the petitioner is pressing only 8 of the 24 demands raised in the Charter of Demands. So only these issues need be addressed, though evidence was let in other issues referred to in the Claim Statement as well.
8. The evidence in the case consists of oral evidence of WWs 1 to 3 and MW1 and documentary evidence consisting of Ext.W1 to Ext.W189 and Ext.M1 to Ext.M12.
9. The points to be considered are:
(i) Whether the issues referred to in the memo filed by the petitioner are justifiable?
(ii) What, if any are the reliefs to which the petitioner is entitled?
6028 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]The Points
10. Regarding the demands raised the counsel for the Respondent has raised a general contention that the ID itself is not maintainable for the reason that it is based on a strike notice only. According to the counsel there cannot be adjudication of the dispute on the basis of a strike notice. However, this is not the case 24 demands were raised by the Petitioner Union and this has been attached to the strike notice. The demands seemed to have been raised even earlier and it was because the demands were not considered. the Assistant Labour Commissioner was approached. The conciliation had ended in failure and thus the matter has come to this Tribunal for adjudication on reference.
11. One of the main demands shown as Demand No. 8 in the demands mentioned in the strike notice is the regularization of temporary employees and canteen employees in the service of the Bank. Along with this there is demand No. 5 regarding recruitment in clerical and subordinate cadre including armed guards and also Demand No. 9 regarding filling-up of vacancies of Sweepers. The counsel for the petitioner wanted these three demands to be considered together and has advanced his arguments accordingly.
12. The demand for regularization of temporary employees can be considered first. In effect the demand is in respect of sub-staff and Sweepers. It is the case of the petitioner that a large number of vacancies are there among the posts of sub-staffs and Sweepers all these are manned by temporary staff who are referred to as casual workers. According to the petitioner most of them have been working for a long time. But the Respondent had not been taking any steps to regularize them in the Bank. The petitioner had submitted a long list of casual workers said to have been working in this manner. However, though the prayer in the claim statement is to regularize all these temporary workers, at the stage of trial the counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is not pressing for individual regularization of the workers, but it would be sufficient if a direction is given to the Bank for framing a scheme for regularization of such workmen.
13. Initially it is to be seen whether the case of the petitioner that huge number of vacancies are there in sub-staff posts of the Bank is correct. The counsel for the petitioner has pointed out referring to the details available from the Bank itself the number of sub-staffs for the Bank has gradually decreased while the number of branches have increased. The counsel has referred to Ext.W188 the extract of the annual report of the bank for the year 2015-2016 in this respect. This shows that the total number of branches the Bank had as on 31.12.2012 was only 1958 while it was 2565 as on 31.03.2016. Extract from the annual report marked as Ext.W22 would show the gradual decrease in the number of sub-staff. As seen from this, the total number of sub-staffs employed by the Bank as on 31.03.2009 was 3014. However, as on 31.03.2010 the number decreased to 2907. This further decreased by March 2011, 2379 by March 2012, 2158 as on March 2013 and 1851 as on March 2015. It could be seen from Ext.W187 a reply given by the Bank to the petitioner consequent to the strike notice that there was no recruitment of sub-staff in 2012-2013 at all while 20 were appointed in 2013-2014 and 13 in the year 2014-2015. As seen from Ext.W188 the annual report of 2015-2016 the total number of sub-staffs available for the bank was only 1234. Even if it is taken that one sub-staff is only required for each branch and other offices of the Bank the number of sub-staffs available for the Bank is very few. After the annual report of 2015-2016 Several sub-staffs were promoted as Clerks, the vacancies that have arisen consequently have brought the number of sub-staffs further down. Can any branch of the Bank or even an office function without a sub-staff or a Sweeper? If the calculation available from the annual reports are taken into account the post of sub-staffs in most of the branches of the Respondent would be remaining vacant. However, it would not be possible for a branch or other offices to function without any sub-staff.
14. It is to be seen how the branches are managing. Is it without any sub-staff? The documents available would show that several persons are engaged as casuals. They are being utilized to do the work of sub-staff and also that of Sweepers, wherever required. Ext.W48 to Ext.W156 are documents giving the details of persons engaged as casuals to do the work of temporary sub-staff and Sweepers. The counsel for the Respondent has stated that these details have no authenticity and could not be taken into account at all. However, it could be seen that the details given are on the basis of communication given by the Bank itself. The Bank had asked the branches to furnish details of the casual employees. The details furnished by the petitioner are codification of details furnished by the different branches. For example Ext.W62 contains details in respect of one Philomina. The next page of the document is the communication given by the Assistant Branch Manager of P.N. Palayam Branch, Coimbatore to the Chief Manager of Zonal Office giving the details such as date of engagement, date of birth, educational qualification and number of days engaged, etc. in respect of Philomina. She is referred to as a casual employee, in the communication. The copy of the voucher regarding payment made to Philomina also is available alongwith the document. Such details of 156 persons are given as per Ext.W48 to Exyt.W156. It could be presumed that at least one person each might have been engaged as sub-staff and as Sweeper in a branch and also in other offices. Even in that case the number of persons engaged as casuals must be very huge. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W5, the record of discussion of the meetings held on 03.08.2006 and 05.08.2006 regarding a strike notice. During the discussion it was stated that regarding the issue of absorption of temporary sub-staff from the approved panel the Management has informed to have already initiated action and sought for clarification from the circles. Thus it could be seen that the practice was to prepare a panel from[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6029 among the temporary sub-staff and absorb them. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W27 consisting of a series of appointments made to the post of Peon in the year 2007. The counsel has pointed out that after this posting in 2007 there was no appointment of sub-staffs at all. The counsel has referred to Ext.W182 to refer to the attempts on the part of the Bank to see that the persons are not continuously engaged. This document, a communication from the Chief Manager states that the vacancies of permanent part-time sweepers are to be managed by engaging casual labourers on turn basis and no single person should be engaged and paid wages for more than a maximum of 18 days in a calendar month.
15. WW3 has been examined on the side of the petitioner to prove the nature of work done by the persons engaged as casual workmen. He has stated that he was engaged by Rajakilpakkam Branch, Chennai from February 2000. He has stated that the time of the branch is from 0900 AM to 0400 PM but he starts his work at 0850 AM in the morning itself and this lasts till 0730 PM when the Officer closes the branch. He has further stated that he has been working on all days and at times even on Sundays for loan recovery work as directed by the Branch manager. At the time of his examination he was getting wages at the rate of Rs. 350/- per day, paid once in three days. He was not paid any wages for weekly holidays. The counsel for the petitioner informed during his argument that WW3 who has been working continuously from the year 2000 in the branch had been turned out by the branch and is now without any work for the reason that he has given evidence before this Tribunal. It is clear from the evidence that the persons named as casuals must be carrying out all the duties to be done by sub-staffs or Sweepers as the case may be. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W20 to show the nature of work to be done by the Sub-Staff, Dafedar, etc. Ext.W20 the Desk Card for sub-staff states that they shall perform all the normal and routine duties of the subordinate staff cadre. WW3 has stated in detail about the nature of work that is carried out by him. It could be seen that he was doing all the work that is expected to be carried out by a sub-staff.
16. Ext.W16 has been referred to by the counsel for the petitioner to point out that the Bank has the autonomy to regularize the temporary workers. But Ext.W16 is the given in parliament on question regarding the vacancies at the Bank. It has been stated in answer that the Government has granted managerial autonomy to the Banks in the matters relating to human resources including recruitment as per their requirements. Thus according to the counsel the Bank is having authority to frame a scheme for regularization of persons who are now working as casual workers. It is not disputed by the counsel for the Respondent that the Tribunal is within its authority to direct the Respondent to frame a scheme.
17. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to the scheme framed by the Syndicate Bank and Canara Bank for the purpose also. Ext.W32 is the circular issued by the Syndicate Bank regarding regularization of temporary employees in Sub-Staff Cadre. The Bank has drawn a scheme regarding the manner in which it is to be done. Ext.W34 is the settlement entered into by Bank of Baroda with the recognized union in the matter of absorption of causal/temporary peons and sweepers. It provides for absorption of these employees in a phased manner. On the basis of this it is pointed out by the counsel for the petitioner that the Public Sector Banks had been resorting to the practice of absorption of temporary employees. It is apparent that the Banks are having the power to take steps for absorption of its employees by framing scheme or otherwise.
18. It is very much apparent from the evidence that WW3 and so many other casual workers whose names and other details are given by the petitioner have been working in the Respondent establishment for a long time. Their service was being appropriated by the Respondent in the same manner as that of temporary employees. In spite of their long service they are not getting any benefits due to permanent employees. In fact they are being exploited naming them casual workers.
19. The Respondent has a contention that the casual employees having been not recruited based on an application or an interview, they could not be made permanent in the establishment in view of the decision in Uma Devi's case. In answer to this, the counsel for the petitioner has referred to the decision in MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER VS. CASTERIBE RAJYA PARIVAHAN KARMACHARI SANGHATHAN reported in 2009 8 SCC 556. Explaining the dictum laid down in Uma Devi's cse the Apex Court has held in this:
"Uma Devi is an authoritative pronouncement for the proposition that the Supreme Court (Article-32) and
the High Courts (Article-226) should not issue directions of absorption, regularization or permanent
continuance of temporary, contractual, casual, daily wage or ad-hoc employees unless the recruitment
itself was made regularly in terms of the constitutional scheme.
Uma Devi does not denude the Industrial and Labour Courts of their statutory power under Section-30
read with Section-32 of MRTU and PULP Act to order permanency of the workers who have been victims
of unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under Item-6 of Schedule-IV where the posts on which
they have been exist. Uma Devi cannot be held to have overridden the powers of the Industrial and Labour
6030 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Courts in passing appropriate order under Section-30 of MRTU and PULP Act, once unfair labour
practice on the part of the employer under Item-4 of Schedule-IV is established".
In view of the above dictum there cannot be any doubt about the power of the Industrial Tribunal to give direction for absorption in proper cases. Item-10 of Schedule-V of the Act states that to employ workmen as badlis, casuals or temporaries and to continue them as such for years with the object of depriving them of the status and privileges of permanent workmen is unfair labour practice. The concerned workmen who were made to work for long years as casual workmen are entitled to be regularized in service. The Respondent has to frame a scheme for this purpose.
20. The petitioner has claimed that Canteen employees are also entitled to be regularized. It is stated in the Claim Statement that the West Bengal Canteen Employees were regularized in the service of the Respondent Bank as sub- staff in accordance with an Award passed by a Tribunal. It is stated that the Respondent has provided Canteen facilities to its employees in the offices and the Respondent has been providing premises, fuel, utensils and other facilities for this purpose. It is further stated that the Canteen is functioning on days when the Bank is functioning only. The Canteen employees are said to be under the direct control and supervision of the Respondent Bank. It is further stated that they have been working for several years for a paltry sum and are entitled to be absorbed in the service. WW1 has reiterated this case in the affidavit filed by him. Ext.W29 contains a list of persons who are said to be Canteen workers.
21. Apart from the statement given by the petitioner that the Canteens are functioning directly under the control of the Bank, there is no other evidence in this respect. None of the workmen who are named in Ext.W29 are examined on behalf of the petitioner. MW1 examined on behalf of the Respondent has of course admitted during his cross- examination that there is a Canteen functioning in the premises. However, according to him the Canteen is not run by the Respondent. The evidence of the petitioner is not sufficient to establish that there is a Canteen run directly by the Respondent for the purpose of the employees and that the workmen of the Canteen are directly under the Respondent.
22. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W8 which would show that the Canteen employees of the Respondent in Kolkata were regularized and posted as sub-staff. However, it could be seen on going through Ext.W8 the judgment of Kolkata High Court that this was on the basis of a compromise entered into by the Bank and the workmen. So far as the present case is concerned it is not even established that Canteen is run by the Respondent and the workmen are under its control. Merely because there is a Canteen functioning at the premises for the use of the employees it cannot be presumed that this is run by the Respondent or that the workmen are under the Respondent.
23. The petitioner is claiming regularization of personnel drivers also. It is stated in the Claim Statement that the Executives of the Bank are employing Personal Drivers and the Bank is paying consolidated monthly salary through the Executives who are engaging Personal Drivers. It is further stated that in the past service of Personal Drivers were regularized. The vacancies are said to be existing in the post of Drivers. The petitioner has reiterated in his Proof Affidavit about the demand of regularization of Personal Drivers.
24. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W3 order issued by the Central Government in support of the case that Personal Drivers can be regularized. Ext.W3 is an order issued by the Government of India requesting the IBA to issue a circular to the Banks. This was done in the background of proposals received relating to absorption of Personal Drivers. It is stated in the order that the Banks are competent to take decision in this respect with the approval of their Boards.
25. It is clear from the very contention of the Claim Statement that the Drivers are engaged by the concerned Executives and not by the Banks. Salary is paid by the Executives, though payment is stated to be by the Banks through the Executives. The very position of these Drivers being that of Personal Drivers, they are not in the employment of the bank either on temporary basis or as casual workmen. So it is for the Respondent to decide whether these Drivers engaged by the Executives are to be absorbed as employees of the Bank or not. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this respect.
26. Demand No. 5 of the petitioner is that sufficient number of employees should be recruited in the Clerical Cadre and in the Subordinate Cadre including Armed Guards. The argument that is advanced is that huge number of vacancies are existing in the establishment and the employees are experiencing pressure of work. While discussing the issue on regularization of temporary employees I have stated that Banks shall take steps for such regularization. Recruitment in the Bank is a policy matter to be taken by the Bank. However, it is in the interest of the Bank also that the vacancies are filled-up by taking necessary steps for recruitment. The petitioner is not entitled to a direction from this Tribunal in this respect. This is the case with Demand No. 9 claiming to fill up the vacancies of Sweepers also.
27. There is also a demand for the petitioner that Part-Time Sweepers shall be promoted as sub-staff. The petitioner has stated in the Claim Statement that as per Government of India guidelines 25% of the vacancies in the sub-staff cadre have to be filled-up by promotion from permanent part-time sweepers. It is further stated that acancies in the sub-[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6031 staff cadre as estimated is 3,453 while the total number of Part-Time Sweepers in the Bank is only 625 and therefore all the Part-Time Sweepers are to be promoted as sub-staff. WW1 has referred to this aspect in his Proof Affidavit also.
28. Ext.W1 is the settlement entered into between the Bank and Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union regarding conversion of permanent Part-Time Sweepers as Full-time employees in the sub-staff cadre. One of the terms of this settlement dated 26.11.2015 which is subsequent to the raising of the dispute is that 25% of the Sub-Staff vacancies will be filled-up from the cadre of Sweepers. It is seen from Ext.W19 that in 2016 several Sub-Staffs were promoted as Clerks. Reference was earlier made to the number of sub-staff and Sweepers the Bank. So there is no doubt that vacancies are available.
29. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to the decision in FCI AND OTHERS VS. PARASHOTAM DAS BANSAL AND OTHERS reported in 2008 5 SCC 100 in this respect. The Apex Court has held that an employee of a State although has no fundamental right of promotion, has a right to be considered therefor. It was further held that when employees are denied opportunity for a long time on the ground that they fell within the category of employees excluded from promotional prospect, the Court will have the jurisdiction to issue necessary direction. In the present there is already settlement providing for promotion. This has been set at naught by creating the post of Housekeeper- cum-Peon as per Ext.W18. This shall not restrict the right that is already provided for promotion. The Respondent has to take speedy steps to fill up 25% of the vacancies from among the Sweepers.
30. There is also a claim for the petitioner that the fuel expenses for the employees should be increased. It is stated in the claim Statement that at present the Award Staff are getting Transport Allowance of Rs. 425/- but this is not sufficient to meet the transport expenses. It is further stated that the Federation of Unions have demanded that cost of 15 litres should be given and the Management has given Rs. 370/- as reimbursement on fuel expenses, but in view of the fluctuation in fuel price the Bank has to pay the actual cost of 15 litres of petrol.
31. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ext.W39 and Ext.W43 where other Banks had provided for larger amount towards fuel expenses. As per Ext.W39 the circular issued by Canara Bank its Special Assistants are entitled to Rs. 500/-, Single Window Operator A&B Rs. 400/- and sub-staff Rs. 300/- towards fuel expenses. By Ext.W43 circular Oriental Bank of Commerce provides for reimbursement of Petrol expenses. The Special Assistants of the Bank are entitled to reimbursement of Rs. 800/- a month, Clerks Rs. 700/- and Subordinate Staff Rs. 600/- a month. It could be seen from the difference of the amount of reimbursement given by the two Banks itself that the amount is decided on the basis of circumstances that exists in each establishment. The petitioner is not entitled to a relief in this respect.
32. There is also a claim that annual incentive should be given to all the employees. The petitioner has stated in the Claim Statement that by a circular the Respondent has unilaterally announced incentive scheme to the staff. The amount payable is Rs. 50,000/- in rural branches, Rs. 75,000/- in semi-urban branches, Rs. 1.00 lakh in urban branches and Rs. 1.50 lakh in Metropolitan Branches. As per the circular the Manager is to select the staff members to whom the incentive is to be paid. It is alleged by the petitioner that all the staff members of the branch were not getting the incentive and the scheme was not being implemented for more than 7 years. According to the petitioner, incentive is payable to all the staff members of the selected branch.
33. Ext.W9 is the incentive scheme provided by the Bank. It could be seen from this that the scheme has been launched to reward the top performers in their operational areas. In that case there is no justification in the petitioner demanding that it should be paid to all the staff of the selected branch. In that case the very purpose of the scheme will be defeated. So the claim of the petitioner to have the incentive paid to all the staff of the selected Bank could not be adhered to.
34. There is a further complaint for the petitioner that even if the scheme was there it was not being implemented for several years. When the scheme for incentive is there certainly it should be implemented. Respondent should take steps to implement the scheme as provided for.
35. There is also a demand for increase in the Canteen subsidy. The subsidy payable was at the rate of Rs. 10/- a day. The demand is to increase it to Rs. 25/- a day. It is seen from Ext.M10 that the subsidy payable has been raised to Rs. 15/- per employee w.e.f. 05.10.2016. According to the counsel for the petitioner this is not sufficient when the cost of living is taken into account. Probably Rs. 15/- or even Rs. 25/- may not be sufficient for the food expenses of an employee for a day. However, what is intended is not to give reimbursement on the entire amount spent. I am not inclined to grant any relief on this count also.
36. There is another demand for the petitioner that risk portion of GSLI scheme is to be borne by the Bank. Out of Rs. 102/- paid as premium the risk portion is Rs. 28.67 and the savings portion is Rs. 73.33. The savings portion is returned to the employee with interest. The demand of the petitioner is that the risk portion of the premium should be6032 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] borne by the Bank. Apart from that those employees who have joined the Bank since 2012 are not covered by the GSLI scheme at all. According to the petitioner the facility is to be extended to them also.
37. It is by Ext.M10 the scheme is made inapplicable to those who joined the Bank after 01.07.2013. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that it is unfair on the part of the Bank in denying the benefit of the scheme to a particular section of employees. The petitioner has not stated on what basis it has been provided that the scheme will apply only to those who joined before 01.07.2013. It is not unusual for the employer to make such restrictions as and when the circumstance demand. So the claim of the petitioner to have the scheme extended to all the employees could not be acceded to.
38. Even the claim of the petitioner that risk portion of the premium should be borne by the Bank has no basis. The scheme is intended to provide financial relief in the event of death of an employee. It is only natural that the portion of the premium towards the risk also is borne by the employee alongwith is the Savings portion. The petitioner has not stated on what basis the Bank is to be made responsible for the payment. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this respect.
39. It has been argued by the counsel for the Respondent that all the demands are matters which were dealt with in the settlement entered into with the recognized union. However, the Respondent has not produced the settlement. Ext.W157 would show that the Bank was not willing to discuss the cause of the temporary employees which has been raised by the recognized union as well. In the reply given by the Bank to the Federation of Unions it is stated that the recruitment of Sub-Staff and conversion of permanent Part-Time Sweepers into Sub-Staff cadre are governed by the Government of India guidelines and the request of the federation to absorb the casual employees cannot be acceded to. So it is clear that even at the time of last settlement the matter was not considered. So execution of a settlement by the Bank and the recognized union is not a bar in granting a relief to the petitioner, in any case.
40. The counsel for the petitioner has argued that until a scheme for regularization of the temporary workmen is finalized and implemented the concerned workmen shall be given pay equal to that of the permanent workmen. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to the decision of the Apex Court in STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS VS. JAGJIT SINGH AND OTHERS in Civil Appeal No. 213/2013 in this respect. In this the Apex Court has considered all the previous decisions regarding payment of equal pay for equal work. Considering everything the Apex Court has held that for entitlement of similar pay the sole factor that requires determination is whether the concerned employees were rendering similar duties and responsibilities as were being discharged by regular employees holding the same / corresponding posts.
41. In the present case it is very much clear from the payment vouchers submitted and also from the evidence given by WW3 that Temporary Sub-Staff and Temporary Sweepers working in the Bank are doing work similar to permanent sub-staff and permanent sweepers respectively, in the Bank. Many of them have been working in the Bank for years and years without getting even minimum wages. Having found that, they are entitled to be regularized in the service of the Respondent, they are entitled to be paid wages equal to that of their co-employees who are in regular service at the entry level, until the scheme is finalized and implemented.
42. Ext.W34, the scheme for absorption by Bank of Baroda provides for absorption in a phased manner so that those who have started to work earlier could be absorbed initially and others in the second and third phases. The Respondent also can frame a scheme in tune with the Ext.W34.
On the basis of the above discussion an Award is passed as below:
The Respondent is directed to frame a scheme in tune with Ext.W34 for regularization of the emporary Sub- Staff and Sweepers
The scheme shall be framed and implemented within one year.
The Respondent shall pay all the Temporary Sub-Staff and Sweepers at the entry level scale of Permanent Sub- Staff and Sweepers respectively, until the scheme is implemented.
The Respondent shall take steps to give promotion to Sweepers as Sub-Staff as per Government guidelines.
The Respondent shall also take steps to implement the annual incentive scheme.
Reference is answered accordingly.
(Dictated to the P.A., transcribed and typed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day the 21st July, 2017)
K. P. PRASANNA KUMARI, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6033
Witnesses Examined:
For the 1st Party/Petitioner : WW1, Sri K. Krishnan
WW2, Sri Jagadish Chandra Jena
WW3, Sri S. Muthukrishnan
For the 2nd Party/Management : MW1, Sri S. Rama
Documents Marked :
On the petitioner's side
Ex.No. Date Description
Ext.W1 04.03.1983 Instructions issued by the Respondent Bank Ext.W2 08.10.1997 Memorandum of Understanding entered between the Bank and the Unions Ext.W3 27.03.2006 Order issued by the Central Government regarding engagement of Personal
Drivers in Public Sector Bank
Ext.W4 16.05.2006 Representation submitted by United Forum of Bank Unions regarding
introduction of incentive schemes
Ext.W5 05.08.2006 Record of discussion regarding strike notice Ext.W6 13.11.2006 Scheme for Award of Cash Incentive Ext.W7 12.04.2007 Letter of Union Forum of Bank Unions regarding incentive Ext.W8 08.05.2009 Order in SLP (Civil) No. 17079 of 2007 Ext.W9 15.07.2010 Performance Linked Incentive Scheme issued by the Respondent Bank Ext.W10 24.06.2011 Reply given by the Bank on RTI Application Ext.W11 18.04.2013 Circular issued by Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union Ext.W12 05.10.2013 Order issued by the Respondent Bank for bonus payment to eligible employees Ext.W13 27.09.2014 Strike Notice issued by the Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union Ext.W14 20.10.2014 Order issued by the Respondent regarding payment of Bonus Ext.W15 03.01.2015 Circular issued by the Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union Ext.W16 10.03.2015 Question raised in Rajya Sabha and the answer given by the Minister Ext.W17 05.10.2015 Letter of Petitioner Federation Ext.W18 26.11.2015 Circular issued by the Federation of Indian Bank Employees Union Ext.W19 28.01.2016 Proceeding regarding promotion from Sub-Staff to Clerical Cadre Ext.W20 - Desk Card for the Sub-Staff Ext.W21 - Manual of Instructions regarding transfer of the Respondent Bank Ext.W22 - Extract from the Annual Reports of the Respondent Bank Ext.W23 - Brochure issued by the Government of India in respect of Promotion of Part
Time Sweepers to the post of Peon
Ext.W24 - List of Permanent Sub-Staff Ext.W25 - List of Permanent Sweepers Ext.W26 - List of Temporary Drivers Ext.W27 - List of Temporary Sub-Staff in various zones Ext.W28 - List of Temporary Sweepers Ext.W29 - List of Canteen employees6034 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Ext.W30 07.10.1996 Charge memo and the punishment imposed in respect of the said charges
concerning one S.V. Prabhakar Rao
Ext.W31 22.03.2003 The punishment order given to one Mr. Ramakrishna Prasad, Assistant Manager Ext.W32 24.02.2006 Circular issued by the Syndicate Bank in respect of appointment of temporary
employees in Sub-Staff cadre
Ext.W33 13.07.2006 Punishment order issued to T. Sundaramurthy, Clerk
Ext.W34 18.03.2008 Settlement entered under Section 12(3) of the ID Act between the Bank of
Baroda and its Union regarding absorption of casual/temporary peons/sweepers
Ext.W35 16.07.2008 Punishment order issued to Mr. P. Ramakrishna Prasad, Assistant Manager
Ext.W36 30.01.2010 Punishment order issued to Part-Time Sweeper G. Soundararajan
Ext.W37 22.07.2010 Punishment order issued to S. Manoharan, Clerk
Ext.W38 24.01.2012 Settlement between Allahabad Bank and its Union regarding Full Time
Sweepers/Part Time Sweepers, etc.
Ext.W39 13.08.2013 Circular issued by Canara Bank regarding reimbursement of conveyance
expenses
Ext.W40 24.10.2013 Proceedings issued by the Respondent Bank regarding engagement of staff
during holidays and payment of overtime
Ext.W41 20.11.2013 Proceedings regarding overtime payment to Award Staff.
Ext.W42 25.02.2014 Proceedings issued by the Respondent Bank regarding overtime payment to
Award Staff.
Ext.W43 30.08.2014 Circular issued by Oriental Bank of Commerce regarding reimbursement of
conveyance expenses
Ext.W44 - Letter of the Petitioner association to the Assistant Labour Commissioner
(Central) in respect of unfair labour practice adopted in payment of overtime
wages to the employees
Ext.W45 23.04.2015 Circular issued by the Vijaya Bank regarding conversion of full time/part time
Sweeper as Peons
Ext.W46 - Award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai in
respect of the dispute raised by the Canara Bank Staff Union concerned the part
Time employees on daily wages and the consequent proceedings in the High
Court and Supreme Court
Ext.W47 - Additional list of temporary Sub-Staff/Sweeper in various zones working in the
Respondent Bank
Ext.W48 - The service details of P.Sunitha, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W49 - The service details of N.Suresh, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W50 - The service details of S. Haridas, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W51 - The service details of M.Rubini, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W52 - The service details of K.Annammal Mary, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W53 - The service details of G.Ganesh, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W54 - The service details of S.Muthukrishanan, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W55 - The service details of P.Sathyakumar, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W56 - The service details of N.Manimegalai, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W57 - The service details of R.Sarala, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W58 - The service details of Ramapriyadarshini, Temporary Sub-staff
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6035
Ext.W59 - The service details of R.Rajeshwari, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W60 - The service details of D.John David, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W61 - The service details of S.Santhamani, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W62 - The service details of A.Philomina, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W63 - The service details of J.Suguna, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W64 - The service details of A.Rukmani, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W65 - The service details of G.Muruganandam, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W66 - The service details of P.Ramesh, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W67 - The service details of K.Krishnaraja, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W68 - The service details of M.Sarala, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W69 - The service details of K.V.Mohanathilagam, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W70 - The service details of M.Ramesh, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W71 - The service details of V.S. Saravanan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W72 - The service details of K.Vigneswaran, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W73 - The service details of M.Selvi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W74 - The service details of E.Muthulakshmi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W75 - The service details of T.Murugan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W76 - The service details of V.Lakshmi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W77 - The service details of G.Jayakumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W78 - The service details of S.Ezhilarasan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W79 - The service details of S.Vasuki, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W80 - The service details of P.Manikandan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W81 - The service details of D.Nesakumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W82 - The service details of P.Natparasan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W83 - The service details of V.Sivakadaksham, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W84 - The service details of S.Keba Charles, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W85 - The service details of N.Balasekar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W86 - The service details of P.Balasubramannian, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W87 - The service details of N.S.Vinoth, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W88 - The service details of K.Ramkumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W89 - The service details of V.Murugan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W90 - The service details of B.Rani, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W91 - The service details of R.Inbaraj, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W92 - The service details of C.Ramesh, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W93 - The service details of E.Jayashanthi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W94 - The service details of S.Palanikumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W95 - The service details of S.Abirami, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W96 - The service details of V.Selvakumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W97 - The service details of S.Rathinam, Temporary Sub-staff6036 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Ext.W98 - The service details of T.Jayanthi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W99 - The service details of R.Dharma, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W100 - The service details of V.Mallika, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W101 - The service details of T.Munusamy, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W102 - The service details of C.Kamalan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W103 - The service details of P.Devaraj, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W104 - The service details of A.Shanthi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W105 - The service details of C.Pushpa, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W106 - The service details of S.Muthuraman, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W107 - The service details of D.Mahendran, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W108 - The service details of T.Vasuki, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W109 - The service details of S.Kannaian, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W110 - The service details of K.Manikandan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W111 - The service details of R.Ramakrishnan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W112 - The service details of P.Jayalakshmi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W113 - The service details of L.Jayakumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W114 - The service details of T.Bharath, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W115 - The service details of M.Vijayalakshmi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W116 - The service details of S.Pandiarajan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W117 - The service details of P.Senthil, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W118 - The service details of G.Vijayan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W119 - The service details of S.Ranjitha, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W120 - The service details of M.Senthilkumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W121 - The service details of N.Nagarajan, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W122 - The service details of L.Kejiya, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W123 - The service details of M.Punitha, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W124 - The service details of Tapan Kumar Adhikary, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W125 - The service details of Pradeep Saga, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W126 - The service details of Dhuramdas, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W127 - The service details of Surajithi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W128 - The service details of Kunal kumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W129 - The service details of U.Yazra, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W130 - The service details of M.Naga Praad Charyulu, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W131 - The service details of Biswanath Mohabatra, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W132 - The service details of Gangadhar Sethi, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W133 - The service details of Hadu Dharai, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W134 - The service details of Kishore Kumar, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W135 - The service details of Rohit Panda, Temporary Sub-staff Ext.W136 - The service details of Sambunath Maharana, Temporary Sub-staff[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6037
Ext.W137 - The service details of Santanu Sekhar, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W138 - The service details of Sunil Kumar Mohabatra, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W139 - The service details of Bindhya Anil, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W140 - The service details of L.Viji, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W141 - The service details of Gajanan Narayana Rao Nathe, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W142 - The service details of Pramod Kumar N.Kukade, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W143 - The service details of Aswin Kumar R.Kubhalwar, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W144 - The service details of Mitu Ashwinbhai, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W145 - The service details of Nayak Chetan Kumar Bhanabhai, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W146 - The service details of Susil Kumar, Temporary Sub-staff
Ext.W147 - The service details of M.Lakshmi, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W148 - The service details of M.Vimala, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W149 - The service details of P.Shanthakumari, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W150 - The service details of A.Senthamizhselvi, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W151 - The service details of M.Ambika, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W152 - The service details of Shiba Prasad Sur, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W153 - The service details of Prasun Acharya, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W154 - The service details of G. Appa Rao, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W155 - The service details of Susil Kumar Sagu, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W156 - The service details of C.Lalitha, Temporary Sweeper
Ext.W157 31.01.1989 Letter written by the Zonal Office, Redhills Branch
Ext.W158 21.03.1989 Letter of the Zonal Manager to the Manager of the Redhills
Ext.W159 06.10.1989 Letter concerning the confirmation of Part Time Sweeper M.Kala Ex.W32
Ext.W160 07.11.1989 Letter of Assistant General Manager regarding confirmation of Part Time
Sweeper M.Kala
Ext.W161 12.10.1992 Circular issued by the Assistant General Manager regarding employment of
persons engaged in leave vacancies
Ext.W162 26.10.1994 Circular issued by the Assistant General Manager regarding employment of
persons engaged in leave vacancies
Ext.W163 05.09.2006 Letter of Union to the Respondent Bank for implementing the understanding
arrived at before the Conciliation Officer
Ext.W164 27.07.2012 Letter of the Zonal Manager calling for details of casual employees/sweepers in
the Branch
Ext.W165 07.08.2012 Letter of the Chief Manager-HRM, to branches to furnish the details of the
Casual employees/sweepers
Ext.W166 30.08.2012 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W167 05.04.2013 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W168 09.05.2013 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W169 21.08.2013 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W170 04.02.2014 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W171 07.11.2014 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation6038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Ext.W172 21.08.2015 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W173 07.10.2015 Notice issued by the Petitioner Federation Ext.W174 28.05.2016 Paper cutting regarding the hunger fast of the Petitioner Federation Ext.W175 25.06.2016 Paper cutting regarding the demonstration of the Petitioner Union to regularize
the services of the employees
Ext.W176 16.08.1990 Instruction issued by the Ministry of Finance regarding absorption of temporary
employees in Public Sector Banks.
Ext.W177 07.03.1991 Instruction issued by the Ministry of Finance regarding absorption of temporary
employees in Respondent Bank
Ext.W178 05.08.1991 Advertisement issued by Vijaya Bank Ext.W179 06.07.1992 Settlement entered under Section 12(3) of the ID Act,1947 Ext.W180 16.02.1998 Order in W.P.No.18998 of 1997 and connected matters Ext.W181 19.03.1998 Order Passed in W.P.No.27834 of 1997 and connected Matters Ext.W182 11.02.2006 Letter from the Personnel Department regarding engagement of casual sweepers Ext.W183 12.03.2007 Sample appointment letter issued to Peon Ext.W184 29.11.2010 Letter of the Zonal Office calling for details of Part Time employees Ext.W185 28.06.2012 Strike Notice Ext.W186 15.11.2012 Letter of Chief Manager, Tirunelveli forwarding the list of casual Labourers Ext.W187 06.02.2015 Letter from Corporate Office of the Respondent Bank to the Union Ext.W188 - Extract of the Annual Report for the year 2015-2016 Ext.W189 - List of employees who received bonus in West Bengal
On the Management's side
Ext.No. Date Description
Ext.M1 - True copy of the settlement dated 07.09.1973
Ext.M2 - True copy of Award dated 20.11.2014 in ID No. 687/2013
Ext.M3 - True copy of Circular No. PRNL-22/2001-2002 dated 04.07.2001
Ext.M4 - True copy of the promotion circulars issued from 2012 to 2016
Ext.M5 - True copy of Bank circulars dated 04.07.2012 & 28.08.2012
Ext.M6 - True copy of the Ministry of finance circular F.No. 16/1/33/2013-IR dated
10.12.2013
Ext.M7 - True copy of Bank circulars dated 21.11.2014 and 19.02.2015
Ext.M8 - True copy of GPAP, GSLI, mediclaim circulars 2012-2015
Ext.M9 - True copy of the mediclaim circulars dated 03.11.2015, 05.12.2016 and
05.10.2016
Ext.M10 - True copy of circular no. HRM:84/2016-17 dated 05.10.2016 detailing the
enhancements/improvements in staff welfare schemes
Ext.M11 - True copy of the strike notice issued by the Union, notice issued by the ALC(C),
Kolkata and the replies filed by the Bank before ALC (C), Kolkata
Ext.M12 - True copy of the proceedings of Dt. CLC (C), Chennai dated 20.07.2016
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6039
नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2071.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूको बैंक
के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 26/2006द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31.08.2017 को प्राप्त
हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/53/2006-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, डेस्क अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2017
S.O. 2071.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 26/2006) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of UCO Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31.08.2017.
[No. L-12012/53/2006-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present :
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 26/2006
Date of Passing Award – 10th July, 2017
Between:
The Manager, UCO Bank, Odapada Branch, Odapada, Po. Hindol Road, Dhenkanal
…1st Party-Management
(And)
Shri Chandramani Prusty, Vill/Po. Bangursing, Dist. Dhenkanal …2nd Party-Workman
Appearances :
M/s. Sanjay Mishra, Advocate … For the 1st Party-Management M/s. Amar Sahoo, Advocate … For the 2nd Party-Workman
AWARD
This is a reference by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (herein referred to as "the Act") made by the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour vide its letter No. L- 12012/53/2006 – IR(B-II), dated 11.10.2006 for adjudication of a dispute between the Management of UCO Bank and the disputant Shri Chandramani Prusty and the schedule of reference is as hereunder:-
"Whether the action of the Management of UCO Bank in terminating the services of Shri Chandramani Prusty is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?
2. The case of the disputant workman is that he was engaged in the Oupada branch of the Management-Bank as a casual worker with effect from 10.07.1984 on daily wage basis. The wage amount was credited to his S.B. Account in the said branch. He worked for more than 240 days in a year on different occasions. According to him on 24.8.1991 he was refused employment without any prior notice or notice pay and compensation, which amounts to retrenchment in6040 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. It is his specific stand that he worked for more than 240 days continuously and uninterruptedly in a twelve months calendar year preceding to his refusal of employment. As provisions of Section 25-F was not complied with while refusing employment to him, his alleged retrenchment was void and illegal and he is required to be reinstated as a casual workman with all back wages and other consequential benefits. It is pertinent to mention here that as per his statement of claim there was an earlier reference for its adjudication with the schedule "whether the action of the Management of the UCO Bank in not regularizing the services of 25 workmen mentioned in the Annexure is justified? If not to what relief the workmen are entitled"? The disputant was listed in Sl. No. 1 of the Annexure of the said reference. The said reference was disposed of by this Tribunal vide I.D. Case No. 40/1991 (C) with an award whereby the retrenchment of the disputant workman by the Management-Bank was held illegal and it is directed to regularize the services of those 25 workmen including the disputant. The Management-Bank challenged the award before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa in a writ bearing O.J.C. No. 6932/1995. While disposing the said writ the Hon'ble High Court has modified the award in respect to the regularization of service of the disputant workman and two others holding that the Tribunal was beyond its jurisdiction to look into the illegal retrenchment of the workman and two others since their retrenchment was not the subject matter of the reference and as they were not in employment, question of regularization of their service did not arise. It is the claim of the disputant workman that he raised a dispute before the Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar for his alleged retrenchment as well as for regularization of his service. But, the reference being silent on the aspect of his illegal retrenchment was disposed of by the Tribunal so far the dispute of regularization of services of 25 workmen including him was concerned. That award having been modified by the Hon'ble High Court, he had no alternative than to raise a fresh dispute before the Asst. Labour Commissioner (C), Bhubaneswar for his illegal retrenchment after modification of the award by the Hon'ble High Court. As no notice pay and compensation was paid while refusing further engagement to him, which amounts to retrenchment, he shall be reinstated with all back wages and other consequential service benefits.
3. The Management-Bank has contested the claim of the disputant workman taking a stand that in view of disposal of earlier reference in I.D. Case No. 40/1991 and the writ bearing No. O.J.C 6932/1995, the present reference is bad in the eye of law. Further, it has been asserted that the disputant workman was never given any appointment in any capacity in the branch of the Management-Bank and as such there was no relationship of "employer and employee" between them and question does not arise for refusal of employment to him. His engagement, if any, was in capacity of a daily wager as and when required and the same was intermittent. There was no need for the branch to engage him on a daily wager and he did not also turn up to work as a daily wager after 24.8.1991 onwards. Such engagement was never exceeded 240 days continuously in a year or twelve calendar months preceding to his alleged refusal of employment. Hence, he was not entitled to any notice pay and compensation and his disengagement, if any, was not in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. That apart, the Management has challenged the maintainability of the dispute on the ground of the same being raised after fifteen years. The reference is also challenged on a contention that on the basis of a settlement with temporary casual workers, it was decided that persons engaged for more than 240 days in a year for a continuous period of three years would be eligible for their absorption against regular vacancies of subordinate or sub-staff of the Management-Bank subject to having other required eligibility. Accordingly application was invited from such casual daily workers engaged in various branches of the Management- Bank. The disputant workman was an applicant and his claim for absorption would not come to the consideration zone as per the terms of settlement dated 12th October, 1998 and he could not be regularized. Having been a party to the settlement as a result of which he was appointed against permanent posts, he is also debarred from raising any dispute. Accordingly, the Management have submitted for dismissal of the claim statement of the disputant.
4. On the aforesaid pleadings of the parties the following issues are settled.
I S S U E S
1. Whether the reference is maintainable?
2. Whether the action of the Management in terminating the service of the workman Sri Chandramani Prusty was justified?
3. If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?
5. The disputant workman and the Management have examined one witness each in support of their respective pleadings and filed documents like xerox copy of the letter dated 28.8.1992. The Management has proved and exhibited the documents like copy of the application dated 18.11.1989 of the disputant workman, xerox copy of the transfer certificate, xerox copy of the circular dated 19.10.1989 with enclosure xerox copy of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa dated 2.9.1995 passed in O.J.C. No. 6932/1995, xerox copy of the complaint given to R.L.C.(C), Bhubaneswar, xerox copy of the reply/views dated 23.1.2006 on the complaint marked Ext.-A to F.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6041FINDINGS
6. For the sake of convenience all the issues are taken up together.
The disputant workman having been examined as W.W.-1 has categorically stated and claimed in his oral evidence that though he worked in the branch of the Management-Bank from 10.07.1984 to 24.08.1991 as a temporary Messenger on the basis of daily wage and he worked for more than 240 days continuously and uninterruptedly in a twelve months calendar year preceding to his disengagement after 24.08.1991, he was not paid compensation and one month notice pay in lieu of termination of his service. Since his termination without notice pay and compensation was illegal and unjustified, he is required to be reinstated along with his all back wages and other consequential benefits. The witness examined on behalf of the Management has denied the assertions of the disputant workman making a statement that his engagement, if any, was purely on daily wage basis as and when extra service was required in the branch and his such engagement was never exceeded 240 days continuously in a year. The disputant workman has filed a photocopy of correspondence between the then Branch Manager and the Zonal Officer which has been marked as Ext.-1. On a close scrutiny of the Ext.-1 it is found that in between 1985 to 1990 except the year 1989 the disputant workman was engaged for more than 240 days in a year in those period. He had also worked 189 days from 1st January, 1991 to 24.8.1991 and he worked 295 days in the calendar year of 1990. If the period of his engagement as a casual labour for the year 1990 and 1991 are taken together it can be safely inferred that he worked for more than 240 days continuously and uninterruptedly prior to his disengagement after 24.8.1991. His service on hire is not also disputed seriously by the Management. Being appointed as a casual daily wager for discharging the duty of a temporary Messenger he was not expected to have been issued with any appointment letter. Moreover, the Management-Bank has not seriously challenged his engagement in the branch of the Bank. On the other hand it is emerging from the oral evidence of the Management witness and the Xerox copy of the circular of the Management-Bank dated 19.10.1989 with regard to the subject of the empanelment and absorption of persons engaged on daily wage basis that a settlement was reached out between the Management-Bank and the Employees Union where-by it was decided that casual workers working for a period of 240 days in a year for three consecutive years would be given an opportunity for their absorption against the post of Messenger/sub-staff of the Management-Bank subject to their other eligibility. Accordingly, applications were invited from casual daily workers. The present disputant was an applicant. But, his application was rejected as he did not complete 18 years when he was first engaged as a daily wager on 10.07.1984. The application was invited in the year 1989 pursuant to the settlement dated 12th October, 1989. Therefore, it is found that by the time of October, 1989 the disputant workman was above eighteen years old and his application was rejected on account of he being not completed the age of eighteen years at the time of his initial engagement as a daily wager on 10.07.1984. Be that as it may, there is no serious controversy with regard to the employment of the disputant workman in the branch of the Management-Bank for the period of 10.7.1984 to October, 24.08.1991 so also his engagement as a daily wager for a period of more than 240 days continuously and uninterruptedly in a twelve months calendar year prior to his disengagement after 24.08.1991. It is to be noted here that as per the settled principle a person, in order to be a "workman" is not required to be employed in a substantive capacity or on a temporary basis in the first instance or after he found suitable for the job or after a period of probation. It is well settled that every person employed in an "Industry", irrespective of his status, be it temporary, permanent or of a probation would be a "workman". Thus, if the evidence on the record is taken into consideration along with the principle mentioned above it can be safely said that the disputant is a "workman" of the Management-Bank as defined under the Act and it is established that he worked for more than 240 days continuous service as defined under Section 25-B of the Act.
7. It is not disputed by the Management that the disputant was not engaged after 24.8.1991. Though it has been asserted by the Management that the disputant did not turn up to work, there is nothing on the record to show that he was ever noticed for his unauthorized absence or voluntary abandonment of the job. Hence, it can be safely held that the workman was refused engagement/employment in the job and as such the said refusal of engagement amounts to retrenchment as defined under section 2(oo) of the Act and the same is not covered by any exception as enumerated in the above provision. There is also no assertion or evidence on the part of the Management to establish that the workman was ever paid any notice pay and compensation as per the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act when his service was dispensed with. In the above back-drops the retrenchment of the disputant was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act.
8. The Management has challenged the maintainability of the reference contending that the disputant was a party to the settlement dated 12th October, 1989 and pursuant to the said settlement he was given an opportunity for being absorbed in the sub-staff cadre of the Management-Bank. But, his application was rejected as he was not eligible on the age ground. Being a party to the settlement he is estopped from raising a dispute and there was no dispute for its adjudication. Coming to the above contention it is seen that there is no evidence on the record to show that the disputant was a member of the Union who was a signatory to the settlement or he was a signatory to the above settlement. The settlement cannot take away the right of a workman to raise a dispute if he was otherwise aggrieved. The settlement does not disclose that workman engaged on daily wage basis in the Management-Bank would be6042 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] refused engagement or employment once they became an applicant for the post of Messenger/sub-staff. Retrenchment was not a subject matter of the said settlement. The dispute came into existence when an engagement/employment was refused to the disputant. For the discussions made above the contention raised by the Management has no leg to stand.
9. The maintainability is also challenged on the ground of the dispute being raised after fifteen years of the alleged retrenchment. Admittedly, the disputant brought an allegation before the Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central), Bhubaneswar for the first time in the year 1995 for his alleged refusal of employment which has given rise to the present reference. It is not in dispute that though Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made under the Act, but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important circumstance which the Tribunal/Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of whether or not such objection has been raised by the other side in view of the Act being silent on the period in which an industrial dispute can be raised. The legal position laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Assistant Engineer, Rajsthan Development Corporation and Another –versus- Geetam Singh reported in (2013) 5 SCC 136 is that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant factors including the mode and manner of appointment, nature of employment, length of service and the cause of delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute. In the case at hand it cannot be over-sighted that there was a reference in which regularization of service of the disputant and 24 others was a subject matter of the dispute in the reference case No. 40/1991(C), and an award passed in favour of the disputants was modified by the Hon'ble High Court in O.J.C. No. 6315/1995 while the same was disposed of on 6932/1995. The disputant raised his dispute with regard to his illegal termination after such modification of the award by the Hon'ble High Court. It is emerging from the copy of the order of the Hon'ble High Court as well as pleading and evidence of the parties that this Tribunal had directed regularization of service of the disputant workman taking a stand that their termination/retrenchment was not legal and justified being violative of provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. However, the Hon'ble High Court have modified the award so far the present disputant and two others are concerned taking a view that the Tribunal is a creature of the Act and the term of reference and as a settled principle it cannot go beyond the schedule of reference. According to the Hon'ble High Court the schedule of the reference was silent as to illegal retrenchment/termination of service of the disputant and two others and as such the Tribunal had no scope to give a finding on the retrenchment of the disputant workman and two others keeping in view the schedule of the reference. In that view of the matter the Hon'ble High Court did not confirm the award of this Tribunal so far regularization of services of the disputant and two others are concerned and modified the award accordingly. It has been asserted by the disputant that he pleaded in the earlier reference about his illegal termination for which the Tribunal asked regularization of his service holding the retrenchment was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. Since the award is modified he had no alternative than to raise a fresh dispute. In the above facts and circumstances it can be safely inferred that the delay in raising the dispute has been reasonably explained and there was no malafide on the part of the disputant for such inordinate delay in raising a dispute on his retrenchment. From the facts and circumstances discussed above, it cannot be held that the disputant was callous and negligent in prosecuting the matter. On the other hand no period of limitation is prescribed in the Act for raising an industrial dispute. As a matter of settled principle the Court may mould the relief by refusing back wages or directing back wages in part if such a dispute is raised belatedly. In this regard it is profitable to quote the principle set out by the Hon'ble Apex in the case of Ajaib Singh –versus- The Sirhind Co-operative Marketing-cum-Processing Service Society Ltd., and Another reported in AIR 1999 SC 1351 wherein it was held that :-
"It follows, therefore, that the provisions of Article 137 of the Schedule to Limitation ct, 1963 are not
applicable to the proceedings under the Act and that the relief under it cannot be denied to the workman
merely on the ground of delay . The plea of delay if raised by the employer is required not be proved as a
matter of fact by showing the real prejudice and not as a merely hypothetical defence. No reference to the
Labour Court can be generally questioned on the ground of delay alone. Even in a case where the delay is
shown to be existing, the Tribunal, Labour Court or Board, dealing with the case can appropriately
mould the relief by declining to grant back wages to the workman till the date he raised the demand
regarding his illegal retrenchment/termination or dismissal. The Court may also in appropriate case
direct the payment of part of the back wages instead of full back wages."
Keeping in view the above settled principle and the provisions of the Act as well as the discussions made above I am of the considered view that the objection raised by the Management with regard to delay in raising the dispute cannot be accepted and relief cannot be denied to the disputant workman on the above ground only if he is otherwise entitled to any remedy under the Act for his illegal retrenchment.
10. Now coming to the issue, to what relief the disputant is entitled, it is found that retrenchment of the disputant workman was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. It is seen that by a catena of decisions in recent time the Hon'ble Apex Court have clearly laid down that an order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside, but an award of reinstatement should not be automatically passed. The award of reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding the date of termination, particularly, daily wagers has not been found to be proper by the Hon'ble Apex Court and instead compensation has[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : सितम्बर 2, 2017/भाद्र 11, 1939 6043 been awarded. At the same time it has been also well settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of decision that relief of reinstatement may not be the natural consequence and it depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In the very nature of things there cannot be a straight jacket formula for awarding relief of reinstatement and back wages. All relevant considerations will entire the verdict. More or less the Tribunal will exercise its discretion keeping in view all the relevant circumstances. But the discretion must be exercised in a judicial and judicious manner. The reason for exercising discretion must be cogent and convincing and must appear on the face of the record. Coming to the case at hand it is not in dispute that he was in temporary job for more than six years. There is in the pleading and evidence of the parties that this Tribunal as well as the Hon'ble High Court have directed regularization of service of some other temporary workmen like the present one in an earlier reference and the disputant workman was denied such relief as he was found to have been disengaged by the Management-Bank when such dispute of regularization of temporary workmen was raised. Had he been continued in his temporary job he could have been regularized in service by this time by virtue of the said award. His application for the permanent post of sub-ordinate staff was rejected merely on the ground that he was not eighteen years old when he was engaged as a temporary daily wager on 10.07.1984. It cannot be over-sighted that when application was invited from such daily wagers like the disputant workman for their absorption against the regular post of sub-staff, the disputant was already completed eighteen years and his application should not have been rejected on the basis that at the time of his initial engagement as a daily casual worker he had not completed eighteen years. In the above back-drops it is a fit case to direct the Management to reinstate the disputant with fifty percent of his back wages to be fixed from time to time on the basis of Minimum Wage Act. Further keeping in view the award passed in earlier reference No. 40/1991(C) and the judgement/order of the Hon'ble High Court passed in O.J.C. No. 6932/1995 the Management-Bank is also at liberty to consider the claim of the disputant workman towards regularization of his service without being influenced by any observation made in this Tribunal.
11. The reference is answered accordingly.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 31 अगस्त, 2017
का.आ. 2072.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पारादीप
पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 13/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 31.08.2017 को प्राप्त
हुआ था।
[सं. एल-38011/02/2010-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, डेस्क अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 31st August, 2017
S.O. 2072.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 13/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Paradip Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 31.08.2017.
[No. L-38011/02/2010-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Desk Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT BHUBANESWAR
Present :
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 13/2010
No. L-38011/02/2010-IR (B-II), dated 22/26.07.2010
6044 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : SEPTEMBER 2, 2017/BHADRA 11, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Date of Passing Award – 12th May, 2017
Between :
The Chairman, Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, Jagatsinghpur … 1st Party-Management.
(And)
The General Secretary, Paradip Dock & Transport Workers' Union, Nishamani Bhawan, Paradip Port, Dist. Jagatsinghpur … 2nd Party-Union.
Appearances :
None … For the 1st Party-Management None … For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Authorized representative for the 1st Party-Management is present. The 2nd party-Union is found absent on repeated calls. After filing of statements/pleadings by the parties and settlement of issues the case was fixed for evidence of the 2nd party-Union. The record further reveals that despite several adjournments from time to time the 2nd party-Union failed to make its appearance or to take any step to adduce its evidence in support of the dispute raised by it. In the above back-drops and in absence of the 2nd party-Union there is no alternative than to presume that either the Union has lost its interest to pursue the dispute for its judicial adjudication or there exists no further dispute between the parties. In the given situation I am constrained to return the reference to the Ministry for taking necessary action at their end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.