रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. No. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक WEEKLY
सं. 2] नई दिल्ली, जनवरी 7—जनवरी 13, 2018, शनिवार/ पौष 17—पौष 23, 1939
No. 2] NEW DELHI, JANUARY 7—JANUARY 13, 2018, SATURDAY/PAUSHA 17—PAUSHA 23, 1939
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड ;iiद्ध
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
विदेश मंत्राालय
;सी.पी.वी. प्रभागद्ध
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 30.—राजनयिक और कोंसुलीय अध्किारी ;शपथ एवं पफीसद्ध के अध्निियम, 1948 ;1948 का 41द्ध की धरा 2 के ख्ांड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में वैधनिक आदेश ।
एतद्द्वारा केंद्र सरकार भारत के दूतावास, बैरूत में श्री दिलीप कौल, सहायक अनुभाग अध्किारी को दिनांक 3 जनवरी, 2018 से सहायक कोंसुलर अध्किारी के तौर पर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के निर्वहन के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/2016]
प्रकाश चन्द, निदेशक ;कोंसुलरद्ध
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(C.P.V. DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 30.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Dileep Koul, Assistant Section Officer as
6 GI/2018
(59)60 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Beirut to perform the Consular services as with effect from 3rd January, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2016]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 31.—राजनयिक और कोंसुलीय अध्किारी ;शपथ एवं पफीसद्ध के अध्निियम, 1948 ;1948 का 41द्ध की धरा 2 के ख्ांड ;कद्ध के अनुसरण में वैधनिक आदेश । एतद्द्वारा केंद्र सरकार भारत के प्रधन कोंसलावास, जेद्दाह में श्री सुनील श्री कर्ण, निजी सहायक को दिनांक 8 जनवरी, 2018 से सहायक कोंसुलर अध्किारी के तौर पर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के निर्वहन के लिए प्राधिकृत करती है ।
[सं. टी-4330/01/2015]
प्रकाश चन्द, निदेशक ;कोंसुलरद्ध
New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018
S.O. 31.—In pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri SUNIL S. KARN, Personal Assistant as Assistant Consular Officer in Consulate General of India, Jeddah to perform the Consular services as with effect from 8th January, 2018.
[No. T-4330/01/2015]
PRAKASH CHAND, Director (Consular)
वित्त मंत्रालय वित्त मंत्रालय वित्त मंत्रालय वित्त मंत्रालय
((((वित्तीय सेवाएं विभागवित्तीय सेवाएं विभागवित्तीय सेवाएं विभागवित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग))))
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 32323232....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) की मद (ख) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी शैलेश रामजी घेदिया (जन्म तिथिः 25.04.1957) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में सनदी लेखाकार (चार्टर्ड अकाउं टेंट) 8ेणी के अंतर्गत अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 32.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Shailesh Ramji Ghedia (DoB: 25.4.1957) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
61 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 33333333....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) की मद (ख) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी बालगोपाल महापात्रा (जन्म तिथिः 12.07.1959) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, आन्Lा बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में सनदी लेखाकार (चार्टर्ड अकाउं टेंट) 8ेणी के अंतर्गत अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 33.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Balgopal Mahapatra (DoB: 12.7.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Andhra Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 34343434....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) की मद (ख) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी के . 8ीनिवास मूNर्त (जन्म तिथिः 19.11.1964) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, कापOरेशन बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में सनदी लेखाकार (चार्टर्ड अकाउं टेंट) 8ेणी के अंतर्गत अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 34.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of clause (9) of The Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri K. Srinivasa Murthy (DoB: 19.11.1964) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Corporation Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 35353535....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) की मद (ख) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी दिनेश सिंह (जन्म तिथिः 22.10.1969) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मGडल में सनदी लेखाकार (चार्टर्ड अकाउं टेंट) 8ेणी के अंतर्गत अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव62 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 35.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Denesh Singh (DoB: 22.10.1969) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 36363636....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (9) के उप-खंड (2) की मद (ख) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (छ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी विवेक सोनी (जन्म तिथिः 24.07.1962) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, विजया बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में सनदी लेखाकार (चार्टर्ड अकाउं टेंट) 8ेणी के अंतर्गत अंशकालिक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 36.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with item (b) of sub-clause (2) of clause (9) of the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government, hereby nominates Shri Vivek Soni (DoB: 24.7.1962) as Part-time Non-official Director under Chartered Accountant category on the Board of Directors of Vijaya Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 37373737....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3- क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी मधु सूदन दादु (जन्म तिथिः 05.06.1963) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, पंजाब एंड सिंध बैंक के िनदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 37.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Madhu Sudan Dadu (DoB: 5.6.1963) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of Punjab & Sind Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
63 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 38383838....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3- क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी आशीष साहा (जन्म ितिथः 08.10.1954) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अिधसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूको बैंक के िनदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 38.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Asish Saha (DoB: 8.10.1954) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of UCO Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 39393939....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3- क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, सु8ी मधुर स्वामीनाथन (जन्म तिथिः 23.02.1961) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, यूनियन बैंक आफ इंडिया के िनदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 39.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Ms. Madhura Swaminathan (DoB: 23.2.1961) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of Union Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of her appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 40404040....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1980 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1980 (1980 का 40) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी शिवरमन अनंत नारायण (जन्म तिथिः 29.09.1950) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इGिडयन ओवरसीज बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव64 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 40.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1980, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Sivaraman Anant Narayan (DoB: 29.9.1950) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of Indian Overseas Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 41414141....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सिTार्थ प्रधान (जन्म ितिथः 12.06.1952) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अिधसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अविध के िलए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, युनाइटेड बैंक आफ इंिडया के िनदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 41.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Sidhartha Pradhan (DoB: 12.6.1952) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of United Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 42424242....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3-क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, डॉ. आत्मानंद (जन्म तिथिः 30.06.1959) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, सेन्ट्रल बैंक आफ इंडिया के निदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 42.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Dr Atmanand (DoB: 30.6.1959) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of Central Bank of India for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
65 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939नई दिल्ली, 27 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.43434343 ....————राष्ट्रीयकृ त बैंक (प्रबंध और प्रकीर्ण उपबंध) स्कीम, 1970 के खंड (3) के उप-खंड (1) के साथ पठित बैंककारी कं पनी (उप$मों का अर्जन और अंतरण) अिधिनयम, 1970 (1970 का 5) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (3) के खंड (ज) और उप-धारा (3- क) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सलिल कु मार झा (जन्म ितिथः 18.07.1953) को उनकी नियुक्ति की अधिसूचना की तारीख से तीन वर्ष की अवधि के लिए अथवा अगले आदेशों तक, जो भी पहले हो, इंडियन बैंक के निदेशक मGडल में अंशकािलक गैर-सरकारी िनदेशक के पद पर नािमत करती है।
[फा.सं. 6/1/2015-बीओ-I]
Jानोतोष राय, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 27th December, 2017
S.O. 43.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (h) of sub-section (3) and sub-section (3-A) of section 9 of The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970) read with sub-clause (1) of clause (3) of the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970, the Central Government hereby nominates Shri Salil Kumar Jha (DoB: 18.7.1953) as Part-time Non-official Director on the Board of Directors of Indian Bank for a period of three years, from the date of notification of his appointment or until further orders, whichever is earlier.
[F. No. 6/1/2015-BO-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
काकाकाका....आ.आ.आ.आ. 44444444....————भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक अधिनियम, 1989 (1989 का 39) की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) के खंड (ग) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, के न्6ीय सरकार, एत7ारा, 8ी सुरेन्6 नाथ त्रिपाठी के स्थान पर 8ी राम मोहन मि8ा, अपर सचिव एवं विकास आयुक्त, सू]म, लघु एवं मध्यम उद्यम मंत्रालय को तत्काल प्रभाव से अगले आदेशों तक, भारतीय लघु उद्योग विकास बैंक (सिडबी) के िनदेशक मंडल में सरकारी नािमती िनदेशक नियुक्त करती है।
[फा.सं. 17/15/2017-आईएफ-II]
सौम्यजित घोष, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 44.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section (6) of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989 (39 of 1989), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Ram Mohan Mishra, Additional Secretary & Development Commissioner, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, as Central Government nominee Director on the Board of Directors of Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) with immediate effect vice Shri Surendra Nath Tripathi, until further orders.
[F. No. 17/15/2017-IF-II]
SOUMYAJIT GHOSH, Under Secy.
स्वास्वास्वास्वास्थ्यस्थ्यस्थ्यस्थ्य और परिवार कल्या और परिवार कल्या और परिवार कल्या और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालय
(स्वा(स्वा(स्वा(स्वास्थ्यस्थ्यस्थ्यस्थ्य एवं परिवार कल्या एवं परिवार कल्या एवं परिवार कल्या एवं परिवार कल्याण िवभाग)ण िवभाग)ण िवभाग)ण िवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 5 जनवरी, 2018
काकाकाका....आ.आ.आ.आ. 45454545....————जबकि, भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद~ (संशोधन) अध्यादेश; 2013 की धारा 3क की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का उपयोग करते 3ए 05 नवम्बर, 2013 को, भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् का पुनर्गठन किया गया था;
66 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]और जबकि भारतीय चिकित्सा अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) (ख) के प्रावधान के अनुसरण में, तीथeकर महावीर विश्वविद्यालय, मुरादाबाद का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा को 27.03.2014 से भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् के सदस्य के रूप में चुना गया था;
और जबकि भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् अिधिनयम, 1956 (1956 का 102) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में तथा संबंधित राज्य सरकार के साथ परामर्श करके के न्6ीय सरकार ने डॉ. किशोर बी. ताओरी का देहान्त होने के कारण रिक्त 3ए आकस्मिक पद पर इस अधिसूचना के जारी होने की तिथि से डॉ. किशोर बी. ताओरी की शेष अवधि अर्थात् 04.11.2018 तक के लिए डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा को भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् का सदस्य मनोनीत किया है।
और जबकि, डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा ने आईएमसी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 3(1)(क) के तहत राज्य का प्रतिनिधित्व करने हेतु एमसीआई का सदस्य बनने के िलए अपनी सहमित दे दी है और आईएमसी अिधिनयम, 1956 की धारा 5(2) के अनुसार, कोई jयक्ति एक ही समय पर सदस्य के रूप में एक से अधिक पदों पर नहk रह सकता। अत: आईएमसी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 7(3) में निहित प्रावधानों के अनुसरण में आईएमसी अधिनियम, 1956 की धारा 3(1)(ख) के तहत तीथeकर महावीर विश्वविद्यालय, मुरादाबाद का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा को भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त हो गई है।
अत: अब तीथeकर महावीर विश्वविद्यालय, मुरादाबाद का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहे डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा की भारतीय चिकित्सा परिषद् की सदस्यता समाप्त मानी जाएगी।
और, इसिलए, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) के प्रावधान के अनुसरण में के न्6ीय सरकार एत7ारा तत्कालीन स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय की दिनांक 9 जनवरी, 1960 की सां.आ. 138 में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना में निम्निलिखत संशोधन करती है, नामत;
स्वास्थ्य और परिवार कल्याण मंत्रालय सं. सां.आ. 3323 (ई) दिनांक 06 नवम्बर, 2013 में भारत सरकार की अधिसूचना तथा उसमें किए गए संशोधनों, अंतिम प्रविष्टि के पश्चात तथा उससे संबंधित प्रविष्टि में निम्निलिखत जोड़ा जाएगा, नामत:
| .सं. | राज् य सरकार का नाम राज् य राज् य राज् य सरकार का नाम | नामित सदस् य का ब् यौ नामित सदस् य नामित सदस् य नामित सदस् य का ब् यौरारारारा का ब् यौ का ब् यौ |
| 14 | महाराष् ट्र | डॉ. वेद प्रकाश मि8ा |
[सं. वी-11013/01/2016-एमईपी]
डी. वी. के . राव, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
(Department of Health and Family Welfare)
New Delhi, the 5th January, 2018
S.O. 45.—Whereas on 5th November, 2013, the Medical Council of India was re-constituted in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013;
And whereas in pursuance of the provision of sub-section (1)(b) of Section 3 of the Indian Medical Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra was elected as a member of the Medical Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 27.03.2014;
And whereas the Central Government, in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and in consultation with the respective State Government has nominated Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra to be a member of the Medical Council of India against the casual vacancy formed due to demise of Dr. Kishor B. Taori for the remainder of the term of Dr. Kishor B. Taori i.e. upto 04.11.2018 with effect from the date of issue of this notification.
And whereas Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has given his consent to be a member of MCI representing the State under Section 3(1)(a) of IMC Act, 1956 and as per Section 5(2) of IMC Act, 1956, any person at the same time may not serve as a member in more than one capacity. Therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra has ceased to be a member of67 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 Medical Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad under section 3(1)(b) of IMC Act, 1956 in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 7(3) of IMC Act, 1956.
Now, therefore, Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra shall be deemed to have ceased to be a member of the Medical Council of India representing Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad with effect from 04.01.2018.
And, therefore, in pursuance of the provision of sub section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the then Ministry of Health number S.O. 138 dated the 9th January, 1960, namely;
In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare number S.O. 3323(E) dated 06th November, 2013 and amendments thereto, after the last entry and entry relating thereto, the following shall be inserted, namely:
| S. No. | Name of the State Government | Details of the Nominated Member |
| 14. | Maharashtra | Dr. Ved Prakash Mishra |
[No. V-11013/01/2016-MEP]
D. V. K. RAO, Under Secy.
उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय उपभोक्ता मामले, खाद्य और सार्वजनिक वितरण मंत्रालय
(उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग) (उपभोक्ता मामले विभाग)
((((भारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरोभारतीय मानक ब्यूरो))))
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 46464646....———— भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो ,rn~}kjk अिधसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृ त कर दिए गए हैं:-
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| $म स ंख् या | लाइसेंस संख् या | स् वीकृ त करने की तिथि | लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पत्ता | भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक | भा मा | भाग | अनु | वर्ष |
| 1. | एल- 9512387222 | 03.08.2017 | म ै0 हिना इG डस् ट्रीस (प्राo) िलo, प् लॉट नंo 45, सैक् टर - 27ए, िजला फरीदाबाद - 121003, हरियाणा | िखजाब, तरल, जैल और $ीम | 8481 | - | - | 2001 |
| 2. | एल- 9512386523 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 आत् मा सो परमात् मा ट्रेडिंग, लोहारू रोड, सिवानी मG डी, िसवानी, िजला िभवानी, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 3. | एल- 9512386725 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 इएयू बाथिंग सोलूशनस प्राo िलo , बिनोला इG डस् ट्रीयल एरिया भौरा कलां, फरूक नगर, िजला xqM+xk¡o - 122413, हरियाणा | जल कायu के लिए तांबा मि8धातु सजावटी एक टोंटी, स ंयोिजत टोंटी समुv चय और रोक वाल् व | 8931 | - | - | 1993 |
| 4. | एल- 9590001818 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 नीरज ज् वैलर्स, 7271, गुड़ बाजार, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 5. | एल- 9590001919 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कु मार सोनी, ब ूरा बाज़ार, िजला रेवाड़ी, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 6. | एल- 9590002020 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 बाबू लाल राजेश कु मार सोनी, ब ूरा बाज़ार, िजला रेवाड़ी, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 7. | एल- 9590002121 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 दलीप ज् वैलर्स, वार्ड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली मG डी, िजला xqM+xk¡o, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 8. | एल- 9590002222 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 दीप ज् वैलर्स, ग ुड़ बाज़ार, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 9. | एल- 9590002323 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 दीप ज् वैलर्स, ग ुड़ बाज़ार, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 10. | एल- 9590002424 | 08.08.2017 | म ै0 दलीप ज् वैलर्स, वार्ड नं0 3, टोडापुर रोड, हेली मG डी, िजला xqM+xk¡o, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 11. | एल- 9590002517 | 16.08.2017 | म ै0 8ी जी ज् वैलर्स, शॉप-1, बेसमेंट, लाला मनीराम माzर्क ट 2nd, मेन बाज़ार, धारूहेड़ा, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2116 |
| 12. | एल- 9512386919 | 17.08.2017 | म ै0 अरावली को-ऑपरेटिव ल ेबर एG ड कं स् ट्रक् शन िलo, गyव व डाकघर पाली, एन. आई. टी., िजला फरीदाबाद - 121004, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 13. | एल- 9512387020 | 21.08.2017 | म ै0 जे. एम. टाइल् स, गyव करनेरा, समयपुर सोहना रोड, स ैक् टर – 56 के नज़दीक, िजला फरीदाबाद – 121004, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 14. | एल- 9590002618 | 23.08.2017 | म ै0 ज़ेवर पैलेस, शॉप नं0 4ए, एनएच-2, 1-2 चौक, एन. आई. टी., िजला फरीदाबाद, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 15. | एल- 9512387121 | 24.08.2017 | म ै0 गौरव इन् टरप्राइसिस, 44 के एम स् टोन, एनएच-2, बराज़र फार्म हाउस के पीछे, गyव सीकरी, बल् लभगढ़, िजला फरीदाबाद, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 16. | एल- 9512387820 | 24.08.2017 | म ै0 अतुल पाइप कॉरपोरेशन, र ेलवे $ासिंग के नज़दीक, म ेन रोहतक रोड,, चरखी दादरी, िजला िभवानी – 127306, हरियाणा | प ूर्वढलित कं $ीट पाइप (प्रबलन सहित और रिहत) | 458 | - | - | 2003 |
| 17. | एल- 9590002719 | 24.08.2017 | म ै0 ओम शिवशंकर ज् वैलर्स, शॉप नं0 549, सारन स् कू ल रोड, बिष् ट स् कू ल के नज़दीक, पर्वतिया कालोनी, िजला फरीदाबाद – 121005, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 18. | एल- 9512387424 | 25.08.2017 | म ै0 8ी राजनाथ कं $ीट उद्योग, िसवानी राजगढ़ रोड, गौशाला के नज़दीक, िसवानी, िजला िभवानी - 127046, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]
एस. के . वर्मा, वैJानिक ई एवं प्रमुख
MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
(Department of Consumer Affairs)
(BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS)
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. 46.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
| Sl. No. | Licences No. CM/L- | Grant Date | Name & Address of the Licensee | Title of the Standard | IS No. | Part | Sec. | Year |
| 1. | L- 9512387222 | 03.08.2017 M/s.. Henna Industries (P) | Ltd., Plot No. 45, Sector – 27A, Distt. Faridabad - 121003, Haryana | Oxidation Hair Dyes, Liquid, Gel and Cream | 8481 | - | - | 2001 |
| 2. | L- 9512386523 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Atma So Parmatma | Trading, Loharu Road, Siwani Mandi, Siwani, Distt. Bhiwani, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 3. | L- 9512386725 | 08.08.2017 M/s. EAU Bathing Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Binola Industrial Area, Bhora Kalan, Faruk Nagar, Distt. Gurgaon - 122413, Haryana | Copper Alloy Fancy Single Taps, Combination tap assembly and stop valve for water services | 8931 | - | - | 1993 | |
| 4. | L- 9590001818 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Neeraj Jewelers, | 7271, Gur Bazar, Distt. Rewari - 123401, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 5. | L- 9590001919 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar Soni, Bura Bazar, Distt. Rewari, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 | |
| 6. | L- 9590002020 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Babu Lal Rajesh Kumar Soni, Bura Bazar, Distt. Rewari, Haryana | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 | |
| 7. | L- 9590002121 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Dalip Jewellers, | Ward No.3, Todapur Road, Haily Mandi, Distt. Gurgaon, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 8. | L- 9590002222 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Deep Jewellers, | Gur Bazar, Distt. Rewari - 123401, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 9. | L- 9590002323 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Deep Jewellers, | Gur Bazar, Distt. Rewari - 123401, Haryana | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 10. | L- 9590002424 | 08.08.2017 M/s. Dalip Jewellers, | Ward No.3, Todapur Road, Haily Mandi, Distt. Gurgaon, Haryana | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 11. | L- 9590002517 | 16.08.2017 M/s. Shri Ji Jewellers, | Shop No.H-1, Basement, Lala Maniram Market 2nd, Main Bazar, Dharuhera, Distt. Rewari - 123106, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2116 |
| 12. | L- 9512386919 | 17.08.2017 M/s. Aravali Co-Operative | Labour Construction Society Ltd., Village & P.O. Pali, N.I.T., Distt. Faridabad - 121004, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 13. | L- 9512387020 | 21.08.2017 M/s. J.M. Tiles, | Karnera, Samaypur Sohna Road, Near Sector – 56, Distt. Faridabad - 121004, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 14. | L- 9590002618 | 23.08.2017 M/s. Zever Palace, | Shop No.4A, NH-2, 1-2 Chowk, N.I.T., Distt. Faridabad, Haryana | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 15. | L- 9512387121 | 24.08.2017 M/s. Gaurav Enterprises, | 44 KM Stone, Behind Brazar Farm House, Village Seekri, Distt. Faridabad, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 16. | L- 9512387820 | 24.08.2017 M/s. Atul Pipe Corporation, Near Railway Crossing, Main Rohtak Road, Charkhi Dadri, Distt. Bhiwani – 127306, Haryana | Precast Concrete Pipe (With and Without Reinforcement) | 458 | - | - | 2003 | |
| 17. | L- 9590002719 | 24.08.2017 M/s. Om Shivshanker | Jewellers, Shop No.549, Saran School Road, Near Bisht School, Parvatiya Colony, Distt. Faridabad - 121005, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 18. | L- 9512387424 | 25.08.2017 M/s. Shree Rajnath Concrete Udyog, Siwani Rajgarh Road, Near Goshala, Siwani, Distt. Bhiwani - 127046, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
[No. CMD/13:11]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 47474747....———— भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन) िविनयम 1988 के िविनयम (4) के उपिविनयम (5) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है कि जिन लाइसेंसों के विवरण नीचे अनुसूची में दिए गए हैं, वे स्वीकृ त कर दिए गए हैं:-
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| $म स ंख् या | लाइसेंस संख् या | स् वीकृ त करने की तिथि | लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पत्ता | भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक | भा मा | भाग | अनु | वर्ष |
| 1. | एल- 9512384721 | 04.07.2017 | म ै0 एशियन सीमेंट वक् र्स, गyव मेघपुर, पलवल सोहना रोड, िजला पलवल - 121102, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 2. | एल- 9590001018 | 04.07.2017 | म ै0 ओमेज़ ज् वैलरी प्राइवेट लिमिटिड, 1269, सैक् टर-4, जिला गुड़गyव - 122001, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 3. | एल- 9590001119 | 04.07.2017 | म ै0 शुभम ज् वैलर्स, गांधी र्चाक, सदर बाज़ार, जिला गुड़गyव - 122001, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 4. | एल- 9590001220 | 04.07.2017 | म ै0 शुभम ज् वैलर्स, गांधी चौक, सदर बाज़ार, जिला गुड़गyव - 122001, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 5. | एल- 9590001321 | 04.07.2017 | म ै0 शगुन ज् वैलर्स, र ेलवे रोड, | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| िजला रोहतक - 124001, हरियाणा | वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | |||||||
| 6. | एल- 9512384822 | 10.07.2017 | म ै0 खतरी इन् टरलो~कं ग टाइल् स, वीपीओ खरक जटान, महम मीनार के नज़दीक, बैंसी, म ेहम, िजला रोहतक - 124514, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 7. | एल- 9512384923 | 10.07.2017 | म ै0 राणा एG ड कौिशक ुप, किला नं0 20/2, मुस् तकिल न ं0 47, गyव हरचन् द पुर, सोहना, जिला गुड़गyव, हरियाणा | पैके जबन् द पेय जल (पैके जबन् द प्राकृ तिक िमनरल जल के अलावा) | 14543 | - | - | 2004 |
| 8. | एल- 9512385622 | 10.07.2017 | म ै0 जे. के . सीमेंट वर्क स, झाड़ली मोहनबारी रोड, झाड़ली, माटनहेल, झाड़ली, जिला झज् जर - 124106, हरियाणा | साधारण पोर्टलैंड सीमेंट | 269 | - | - | 2015 |
| 9. | एल- 9512385723 | 10.07.2017 | म ै0 8ी जी प्रीकास् ट, गyव व डाकघर सिदीपुरा लोवा, बहादुरगढ़, जिला झज् जर -- 124507, हरियाणा | पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट म ेनहोल के ढक् कन व े म | 12592 | - | - | 2002 |
| 10. | एल- 9512385024 | 11.07.2017 | म ै0 8ी श् याम इन् टरप्राइसिस, एनएच-2, राजस् थान मोटल के सामने, होडल, िजला पलवल – 121106, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 11. | एल- 9512385117 | 13.07.2017 | म ै0 8ी बालाजी इन् टरलो~कं ग टाइल् स, वी. पी. ओ. भलोट, िजला रोहतक, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 12. | एल- 9590001422 | 13.07.2017 | म ै0 सतगुरू ज् वैलर्स, ओल् ड अनाज मG डी, मेहम, िजला िभवानी - | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 124112, हरियाणा | वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | |||||||
| 13. | एल- 9512385218 | 14.07.2017 | म ै0 8ी ओम इन् टरप्राइसिस, गyव कान् हावास, पी ओ स ंगवारी, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123401, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 14. | एल- 9512385319 | 14.07.2017 | म ै0 यादव लो~कं ग टाइल् स एG ड बिल्डिंग मैटीरियल सपलायर, गyव सादत नगर, तहसील कोसली, िजला रेवाड़ी - 123302, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 15. | एल- 9512385420 | 14.07.2017 | म ै0 जय दुग कं $ीट उद्योग, गyव घरौट, तहसील हथीन, िजला पलवल - 121103, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 16. | एल- 9512385521 | 17.07.2017 | म ै0 हरियाणा इलैक् ट्रीकल इक् यूपमेंट, खसरा नंo 104/55, किला नंo 9/3/1, गyव- ढोरका, वज़ीरपुर, जिला गुड़गyव - 123505, हरियाणा | बाहय रंग तेल इम् मेर्सड वितरण ट्रांसफार्मर भाग 1 िमनरल तेल निमिति | 1180 | 01 | - | 2014 |
| 17. | एल- 9512385925 | 17.07.2017 | म ै0 टी.एम.एस. इन् टरप्राइसिस, वीपीओ-लुहारी, जिला झज् जर - 124108, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 18. | एल- 9512386624 | 17.07.2017 | म ै0 बीके डी बैवरेिजस, गyव धनकोट, झज् जर रोड, जिला गुड़गyव - 122505, हरियाणा | पैके जबन् द प्रय जल (पैके जबन् द प्राकृ तिक िमनरल जल के अलावा) | 14543 | - | - | 2004 |
| 19. | एल- 9590001523 | 17.07.2017 | म ै0 एम. एल. ज् वैलर्स , शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712, 33 फु ट रोड, स ंजय कलोनी, सैक् टर-23, िजला फरीदाबाद - 121005, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 20. | एल- 9590001624 | 17.07.2017 | म ै0 एम. एल. ज् वैलर्स , शॉप नं0 एमसीएफ-3712, 33 फु ट रोड, स ंजय कलोनी, सैक् टर-23, िजला फरीदाबाद - 121005, हरियाणा | चyदी एवं चyदी मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 21. | एल- 9512385824 | 24.07.2017 | म ै0 अल् ट्राकोन इन् ाके म (प्राo) िलo, प् लॉट नंo 5ए, सैक् टर - 79, गyव नौरंगपुर, िजला गुड़गyव - 122050, हरियाणा | क ं $ीट एडमिक् स् चर | 9103 | - | - | 1999 |
| 22. | एल- 9512386119 | 25.07.2017 | म ै0 यूनीक टाइल् स इG डस् ट्रीस, गyव गरही बोहार, पी.ओ. अस् थल बोहार, िजला रोहतक - 124521, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 23. | एल- 9512386321 | 25.07.2017 | म ै0 पूजा टाइल् स, गyव नसीबपुर, बरखोदा, तहसील नारनौल, जिला महैन् 6गढ़ - 123001, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 24 | एल- 9512386018 | 26.07.2017 | म ै0 इG डो िसयाम सेफटी प्रोडक् टस प्राइवेट लिमिटिड, प् लॉट नं0 149, दूसरा तल, स ैक् टर-7, आईएमटी मानेसर, जिला गुड़गyव - 122050, हरियाणा | दुपिहया वाहन चालकों के लिए स ंरक्षी हेल् मेट | 4151 | - | - | 1993 |
| 25. | एल- 9512386220 | 26.07.2017 | म ै0 8ी श् याम टाइल् स एG ड म ैटीरियल सपलायर, खाता नं0 421/457, नन् दरामपुर बास, सलारपुर मोड़, धारूहेड़ा, िजला रेवाड़ी – 123106, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 26. | एल- 9512386422 | 27.07.2017 | म ै0 जिन् दल सैनीटेरीवेयर प्रा0 लि0, 3 के एम माइल स् टोन, वीपीओ रोहद, जिला झज् जर - 124501, हरियाणा | क ं $ीट एडमिक् स् चर - स ुपर प् लास् टीसाइ़जिंग मि8ण (कं $ीट मि8ण के लिए पानी कम) - सामान् य प्रकार | 7834 | 01 | - | 1987 |
| 27. | एल- 9512386826 | 27.07.2017 | म ै0 जय बाबा ट्रेडिंग कं 0, चरखी दादरी लाहारू रोड, गyव हरोदा कलां, तहसील चरखी दादरी, िजला िभवानी – 127308, हरियाणा | खड़ंजे के िलए पूर्व ढलित कं $ीट ब् लॉक | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 28. | एल- 9590001717 | 27.07.2017 | म ै0 राजदीप ज् वैलर्स, न् यू सराफर बाज़ार, बारा हज़ारी रोड, िजला रेवाड़ी - 123401, हरियाणा | स् वर्ण एवं स् वर्ण मि8धातु आभूषण/शिल् प वस् तुx – महीनता एवं म ुहरांकन | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
[सं. सीएमडी/13 : 11]
एस. के . वर्मा, वैJानिक ई एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. 47.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (5) of the regulation 4 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulation 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies the grant of licence particulars of which are given in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
| Sl. No. | Licences No. CM/L- | Grant Date | Name & Address of the Licensee | Title of the Standard | IS No. | Part | Sec. | Year |
| 1. | L- 9512384721 | 04.07.2017 M/s Asian Cement Works, Village Meghpur, Palwal Sohna Road, Distt. Palwal - 121102, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 | |
| 2. | L- 9590001018 | 04.07.2017 M/s Ornaz Jewellery Private Limited, 1269, Sector-4, Distt. Gurgaon - 122001, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 | |
| 3. | L- 9590001119 | 04.07.2017 M/s Shubham Jewellers, | Gandhi Chowk, Sadar Bazar, Distt. Gurgaon - 122001, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 4. | L- 9590001220 | 04.07.2017 M/s Shubham Jewellers, | Gandhi Chowk, Sadar Bazar, Distt. Gurgaon - 122001, | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| Haryana | ||||||||
| 5. | L- 9590001321 | 04.07.2017 M/s Shagun Jewellers, | Railway Road, Distt. Rohtak - 124001, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 6. | L- 9512384822 | 10.07.2017 M/s Khatri Interlocking | Tiles, VPO Kharak Jatan, Near Mahan Miner, Bainsi, Meham, Kharak, Distt. Bhiwani - 124514, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 7. | L- 9512384923 | 10.07.2017 M/s Rana & Kaushik | Group, Kila No. 20/2, Mustkil No. 47, Village Harchand Pur, Sohna, Distt. Gurgaon, Haryana | Packaged Drinking Water (Other Than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) | 14543 | - | - | 2004 |
| 8. | L- 9512385622 | 10.07.2017 M/s J.K. Cement Works, | Jharli Mohanbari Road, Jharli, Matanhail, Jharli, Distt. Jhajjar - 124106, Haryana | Ordinary Portland Cement | 269 | - | - | 2015 |
| 9. | L- 9512385723 | 10.07.2017 M/s Shree Jee Precast, | V & P.O. Siddipura Lowa, Bahadurgarh, Distt. Jhajjar -- 124507, Haryana | Precast Manhole Cover and Frame | 12592 | - | - | 2002 |
| 10. | L- 9512385024 | 11.07.2017 M/s Shree Shyam | Enterprises, NH-2, Opp. Rajesthan Motel, Hodal, Distt. Palwal - 121106, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 11. | L- 9512385117 | 13.07.2017 M/s Shree Balaji | Interlocking Tiles, V P O-Bhalot, Bhalot, Distt. Palwal, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 12. | L- 9590001422 | 13.07.2017 M/s Satguru Jewellers, | Old Anaj Mandi, Meham, Distt. Bhiwani - 124112, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 13. | L- 9512385218 | 14.07.2017 M/s Shree Om Enterprises, Village Kanhawas, P.O. Sangwari, Distt. Rewari – 123401, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 | |
| 14. | L- 9512385319 | 14.07.2017 M/s Yadav Locking Tiles & Building Material Supplier, Village Sadat Nagar, Tehsil | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 | |
| Kosli, Kosli, Distt. Rewari - 123302, Haryana | ||||||||
| 15. | L- 9512385420 | 14.07.2017 M/s Jai Durge Concrete | Udyog, Village Gharrot, Tehsil Hathine, Hathine, Distt. Palwal - 121103, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 16. | L- 9512385521 | 17.07.2017 M/s Haryana Electrical | Equipment, Khasra No. 104/55, Kila No. 9/3/1, Village Dhorka, Wazipur, Distt. Gurgaon - 123505, Haryana | Outdoor Type Oil Immersed Distribution Transformers, Part 1: Minerals Oil Immersed | 1180 | 01 | - | 2014 |
| 17. | L- 9512385925 | 17.07.2017 M/s T.M.S. Enterprises, | VPO-Luhari, Distt. Jhajjar - 124108, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 18. | L- 9512386624 | 17.07.2017 M/s BKD Beverages, | Village Dhankot, Jhajjar Road, Distt. Gurgaon - 122505, Haryana | Packaged Drinking Water (Other Than Packaged Natural Mineral Water) | 14543 | - | - | 2004 |
| 19. | L- 9590001523 | 17.07.2017 M/s M.L. Jewellers, | Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft Road, Sanjay Colony, Sector-23, Distt. Faridabad - 121005, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
| 20. | L- 9590001624 | 17.07.2017 M/s M.L. Jewellers, | Shop No.MCF-3712, 33 ft Road, Sanjay Colony, Sector-23, Distt. Faridabad - 121005, Haryana | Silver and Silver Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 2112 | - | - | 2014 |
| 21. | L- 9512385824 | 24.07.2017 M/s Ultracon Infrachem (P) Limited, 422/38, Rajiv Colony, Opp. Hotel Melfort, N.H.8, Distt. Gurgaon – 122001, Haryana | Concrete Admixtures | 9103 | - | - | 1999 | |
| 22. | L- 9512386119 | 25.07.2017 M/s Unique Tiles Industries, Village Garhi Bohar, P.O. Asthal Bohar, Distt. Rohtak, - 124521, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 | |
| 23. | L- 9512386321 | 25.07.2017 M/s Pooja Tiles, | Village Nasibpur, Barkhoda, Tehsil Narnaul, Distt. Maherdragarh - 123001, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 24. | L-9512386018 | 26.07.2017 M/s Indo Siam Safety | Products Private Limited, Plot No. 149, 2nd Floor, Sector-7, IMT Manesar, Distt. Gurgaon - 122050, Haryana | Protective Helmets for Two Wheeler Riders | 4151 | - | - | 1993 |
| 25. | L-9512386220 | 26.07.2017 M/s Shree Shyam Tile & | Material Supplier, Khata No. 421/457, Nandrampur Bas, Salarpur Mod, Dharuhera, Distt. Rewari – 123106, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 |
| 26. | L-9512386422 | 27.07.2017 M/s Jindal Sanitaryware | Pvt. Ltd., 3 KM Mile Stone, VPO Rohad, Rohad, Distt. Jhajjar - 124501, Haryana | Injection Moulded PVC Socket Fittings with Solvent Cement Joints for Water Supplies | 7834 | 01 | - | 1987 |
| 27. | L-9512386826 | 27.07.2017 M/s Jai Balaji Trading Co., Charkhi Dadri Loharu Road, Vill. Haroda Kalan, Teh. Charkhi Dadri, Charkhi Dadri, Distt. Bhiwani – 127308, Haryana | Precast Concrete Blocks for Paving | 15658 | - | - | 2006 | |
| 28. | L-9590001717 | 27.07.2017 M/s Rajdeep Jewellers, | New Sarafa Bazar, Bara Hazari Road, Distt. Rewari - 123401, Haryana | Gold and Gold Alloys Jewellery/Artefacts - Fineness and Marking | 1417 | - | - | 2016 |
[No. CMD/13:11]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 48484848....———— भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत7ारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द /स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| $म स ंख् या | लाइसेंस संख् या सीएम/एल | लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पत्ता | लाइसेंस के अन् तर्गत वस् तु/प्र$म सम् बT भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक | रद करने की तिथि |
| 01 | एल-9951304 | म ै0 मंगला पोलीमर्स, रसूलपुर, रेलवे $ोसिंग के नज़दीक, िजला पलवल – 121102, हरियाणा | कन् डयूटस फॉर इलैक् ट्रीकल इन् सटालेशनंस भाग 3- रिजिड प् लेन कन् डयूटस ऑफ दन् सूलेटंग म ैटीरियलस आई एस 9537(भाग 3):1983 | 25.07.2017 |
[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]
एस. के . वर्मा, वैJानिक ई एवं प्रमुख80 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. S.O. S.O. S.O. 48484848....————In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
| Sl. No. | Licences No. CM/L- | Name & Address of the Licensee | Article/Process with relevant Indian Standards covered by the licence Cancelled/suspension | Date of Cancellation |
| 01 | L-9951304 | M/s Mangla Polymers, Rasulpur, Near Railway Crossing, Distt. Palwal - 121102, Haryana | Conduits for Electrical Installation Part 3: Rigid Plain Conduits of Insulating Materials IS 9537(Pt. 3):1983 | 25.07.2017 |
[No. CMD/13:13]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head
नई दिल्ली, 22 दिसम्बर, 2017
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 49494949....———— भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो (प्रमाणन) िविनयम, 1988 के िविनयम (5) के उपिविनयम (6) के अनुसरण में भारतीय मानक ब्यूरो एत7ारा अधिसूचित करता है कि निम्न विवरण वाले लाइसेंसों को उनके आगे दर्शायी गई तारीख से रद्द /स्थगित कर दिया गया है :-
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| $. स ं. | लाइसेंस सं सी एम/ एल- | लाइसेंसधारी का नाम व पता | लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत वस्तु/ प्र$म सम्बT भारतीय मानक का शीर्षक | रद्द होने की ितिथ |
| श ून्य |
[सं. सीएमडी/13:13]
एस. के . वर्मा, वैJानिक ई एवं प्रमुख
New Delhi, the 22nd December, 2017
S.O. S.O. S.O. S.O. 49494949....————In pursuance of sub-regulation (6) of the regulation 5 of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Certification) Regulations 1988, of the Bureau of Indian Standards, hereby notifies that the licences particulars of which are given below have been cancelled/suspended with effect from the date indicated against each:
SCHEDULE
| Sl. No. | Licence No. CM/L- | Name & Address of the Licensee | Article/ Process with relevant Indian Standard covered by the licence cancelled/suspension | Date of Cancellation |
| NIL |
[No. CMD/13:13]
S. K. VERMA, Scientist E & Head81 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 4 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 50505050....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 35 दिनांक 02.09.2017 का.आ संख्या 2016 दिनांक 23.08.2017, भाग II, खGड 3, उप-खGड (II) में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट पंजाब राज्य की तहसील नवांशहर, जिला शहीद भगत सिंह नगर तथा तहसील गढ़शंकर, जिला होशियारपुर की भूमि में, पंजाब राज्य के गाँव : झुिगयां : जिला शहीद भगत सिंह नगर से हिमाचल प्रदेश के गाँव : पेखुबेला, जिला उना तक पैट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑइल कापOरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पीएजेपीएल - उना ब्रांच पाइपलाइन परियोजना के सम्बंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी।
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचनाओं की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 23.11.2017 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी।
और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनि(cid:135)य किया है।
अत: अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए।
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाय सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कापOरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अधिनियम 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूNर्त के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कापOरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामलें पर के न्6ीय सरकार के वि(cid:140)T कोई वाद दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहk हो सके गी।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| राज्य : पंजाब | ||||||||
| $ ं . स ं. | िजला | तहसील | गाँव का नाम | हदबस्त न ं | म ुरब्बा // किला तथा खसरा सं. | क्ष ेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 1 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | झुिगयां | 285 | 12 // 1 | 00 | 03 | 18 |
| 6 // 25/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 21 | 00 | 08 | 79 | |||||
| 5 // 22 | 00 | 13 | 17 | |||||
| 5 // 23 | 00 | 04 | 55 | |||||
| 5 // 19/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 18/2 | 00 | 08 | 30 | |||||
| 5 // 17/1 | 00 | 01 | 76 | |||||
| 5 // 17/2 | 00 | 11 | 23 | |||||
| 5 // 16 | 00 | 08 | 79 | |||||
| 5 // 15 | 00 | 03 | 55 | |||||
| 4 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 4 // 11 | 00 | 12 | 93 | |||||
| 4 // 12 | 00 | 12 | 08 | |||||
| 4 // 13 | 00 | 03 | 01 | |||||
| 4 // 9/1 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 4 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 82 | |||||
| 4 // 7 | 00 | 06 | 65 | |||||
| 38 रास्ता | 00 | 02 | 46 | |||||
| 2 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | ज ुलाह माजरा | 286 | 54 // 8 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 79/1 रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 32 | |||||
| 54 // 7 | 00 | 07 | 76 | |||||
| 54 // 4 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 54 // 6 | 00 | 01 | 69 | |||||
| 54 // 5/2 | 00 | 12 | 50 | |||||
| 53 //1 | 00 | 00 | 83 | |||||
| 3 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | खोजा | 284 | 22 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 21 // 1 | 00 | 11 | 55 | |||||
| 21 // 2 | 00 | 01 | 60 | |||||
| 9 // 21 | 00 | 01 | 13 | |||||
| 9 // 22 | 00 | 11 | 27 | |||||
| 9 // 23 | 00 | 12 | 69 | |||||
| 9 // 24 | 00 | 07 | 50 | |||||
| 9 // 17 | 00 | 05 | 80 | |||||
| 9 // 16 | 00 | 13 | 26 | |||||
| 10 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 79 | |||||
| 10 // 11 | 00 | 00 | 61 | |||||
| 10 // 12 | 00 | 10 | 33 | |||||
| 10 // 19 | 00 | 02 | 30 | |||||
| 10 // 13 | 00 | 13 | 01 | |||||
| 10 // 14 | 00 | 07 | 84 | |||||
| 10 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 10 // 7 | 00 | 05 | 05 | |||||
| 10 // 6 | 00 | 12 | 59 | |||||
| 11 // 10 | 00 | 12 | 44 | |||||
| 11 // 9 | 00 | 03 | 23 | |||||
| 11 // 1 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 11 // 2 | 00 | 09 | 88 | |||||
| 11 // 3 | 00 | 12 | 46 | |||||
| 11 // 4 | 00 | 09 | 31 | |||||
| 11 // 5 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 7 // 24 | 00 | 03 | 91 | |||||
| 7 // 25 | 00 | 13 | 31 | |||||
| 6 // 21 | 00 | 11 | 13 | |||||
| 6 // 22 | 00 | 00 | 79 | |||||
| 6 // 20 | 00 | 01 | 70 | |||||
| 6 // 19 | 00 | 11 | 60 | |||||
| 6 // 18 | 00 | 12 | 86 | |||||
| 6 // 17 | 00 | 06 | 48 | |||||
| 6 // 14 | 00 | 06 | 35 | |||||
| 6 // 15 | 00 | 12 | 99 | |||||
| 5 // 11/1 | 00 | 08 | 72 | |||||
| 5 // 11/2 | 00 | 00 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 11/3 | 00 | 02 | 53 | |||||
| 98 रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 82 | |||||
| 5 // 28 | 00 | 01 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 12/1 | 00 | 02 | 08 | |||||
| 5 // 12/2 | 00 | 00 | 98 | |||||
| 5 // 9/2 | 00 | 08 | 58 | |||||
| 62 | 00 | 01 | 55 | |||||
| 5 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 7 | 00 | 12 | 28 | |||||
| 5 // 6 | 00 | 11 | 14 | |||||
| 4 // 10/2/1 | 00 | 05 | 80 | |||||
| 4 // 10/2/2 | 00 | 03 | 89 | |||||
| 4 // 10/1 | 00 | 02 | 71 | |||||
| 4 // 9 | 00 | 06 | 63 | |||||
| 4 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | ताजपुर | 283 | 27 // 2 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 27 // 9 | 00 | 02 | 43 | |||||
| 27 // 3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 27 // 4 | 00 | 07 | 68 | |||||
| 27 // 5 | 00 | 11 | 55 | |||||
| 27 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 51 | |||||
| 27 // 7 | 00 | 04 | 82 | |||||
| 27 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 78 | |||||
| 26 // 1 | 00 | 12 | 76 | |||||
| 26 // 2/1 | 00 | 06 | 07 | |||||
| 46 रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 45 रास्ता | 00 | 02 | 47 | |||||
| 26 // 2/3 | 00 | 03 | 96 | |||||
| 26 // 3 | 00 | 07 | 55 | |||||
| 5 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | लालेवाल | 282 | 6 // 3 | 00 | 04 | 53 |
| 6 // 4 | 00 | 12 | 31 | |||||
| 6 // 5 | 00 | 07 | 27 | |||||
| 1 // 25 | 00 | 06 | 01 | |||||
| 2 // 21 | 00 | 08 | 86 | |||||
| 6 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | गडी भारटी | 218 | 55 // 6 | 00 | 09 | 62 |
| 85 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 21 | |||||
| 56 // 10 | 00 | 13 | 76 | |||||
| 7 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | भारटा कलां | 219 | 53 // 9 | 00 | 09 | 98 |
| 53 // 8 | 00 | 12 | 19 | |||||
| 53 // 7 | 00 | 12 | 09 | |||||
| 53 // 4 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 53 // 5 | 00 | 02 | 02 | |||||
| 53 // 6 | 00 | 10 | 30 | |||||
| 52 // 1 | 00 | 06 | 84 | |||||
| 52 // 10 | 00 | 05 | 29 | |||||
| 52 // 2 | 00 | 11 | 40 | |||||
| 52 // 9 | 00 | 00 | 53 | |||||
| 52 // 3 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 52 // 4/2 | 00 | 12 | 23 | |||||
| 52 // 5/1 | 00 | 05 | 73 | |||||
| 52 // 5/2 | 00 | 03 | 41 | |||||
| 52 // 5/3 | 00 | 03 | 16 | |||||
| 51 // 1/1 | 00 | 01 | 41 | |||||
| 51 // 1/2 | 00 | 09 | 00 | |||||
| 51 // 2/1 | 00 | 09 | 81 | |||||
| 51 // 2/2 | 00 | 02 | 32 | |||||
| 51 // 3/1 | 00 | 11 | 95 | |||||
| 51 // 4 | 00 | 08 | 00 | |||||
| 51 // 5 | 00 | 01 | 12 | |||||
| 46 // 23 | 00 | 00 | 39 | |||||
| 46 // 24 | 00 | 06 | 06 | |||||
| 46 // 25 | 00 | 11 | 51 | |||||
| 47 // 21 | 00 | 11 | 40 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 06 | |||||
| 47 // 22 | 00 | 12 | 37 | |||||
| 47 // 23 | 00 | 11 | 73 | |||||
| 47 // 18 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 47 // 17 | 00 | 03 | 90 | |||||
| 47 // 24 | 00 | 08 | 52 | |||||
| 47 // 25 | 00 | 02 | 12 | |||||
| 47 // 16 | 00 | 10 | 27 | |||||
| 48 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 91 | |||||
| 48 // 19/2 | 00 | 11 | 82 | |||||
| 48 // 18 | 00 | 11 | 39 | |||||
| 8 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | दरीयापुर | 278 | 15 // 18 | 00 | 00 | 68 |
| 15 // 17 | 00 | 11 | 27 | |||||
| 15 // 14 | 00 | 01 | 17 | |||||
| 15 // 15 | 00 | 07 | 20 | |||||
| 15 // 16 | 00 | 05 | 60 | |||||
| 14 // 20/2 | 00 | 00 | 51 | |||||
| 14 // 11/1 | 00 | 03 | 50 | |||||
| 33 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 48 | |||||
| 14 // 11/2 | 00 | 06 | 93 | |||||
| 14 // 20/1/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 14 // 12 | 00 | 12 | 59 | |||||
| 14 // 26 | 00 | 00 | 95 | |||||
| 14 // 13/1 | 00 | 01 | 10 | |||||
| 14 // 13/2 | 00 | 10 | 71 | |||||
| 14 // 14 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 14 // 15 | 00 | 12 | 05 | |||||
| 13 // 11/1 | 00 | 03 | 85 | |||||
| 13 // 10/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 43 रास्ता | 00 | 07 | 12 | |||||
| 13 // 10/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 13 // 11/2 | 00 | 05 | 86 | |||||
| 13 // 12 | 00 | 05 | 59 | |||||
| 13 // 13/1 | 00 | 00 | 68 | |||||
| 13 // 9/1 | 00 | 03 | 78 | |||||
| 13 // 8/1 | 00 | 09 | 50 | |||||
| 13 // 7/1 | 00 | 12 | 47 | |||||
| 13 // 6/1 | 00 | 12 | 46 | |||||
| 12 // 26 | 00 | 03 | 35 | |||||
| 12 // 10/1 | 00 | 08 | 90 | |||||
| 12 // 9/1 | 00 | 12 | 88 | |||||
| 12 // 8/1 | 00 | 10 | 63 | |||||
| 12 // 3 | 00 | 01 | 60 | |||||
| 12 // 4 | 00 | 07 | 66 | |||||
| 12 // 5 | 00 | 04 | 26 | |||||
| 12 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 12 // 7/1 | 00 | 04 | 99 | |||||
| 9 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | काहलों | 222 | 69 // 5 | 00 | 07 | 45 |
| 69 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 27 | |||||
| 70 // 1/1 | 00 | 07 | 60 | |||||
| 70 // 1/2 | 00 | 04 | 42 | |||||
| 70 // 2 | 00 | 11 | 94 | |||||
| 70 // 3 | 00 | 10 | 70 | |||||
| 132 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 37 | |||||
| 70 // 4 | 00 | 11 | 85 | |||||
| 70 // 5 | 00 | 11 | 90 | |||||
| 67 // 25 | 00 | 00 | 21 | |||||
| 71 // 1 | 00 | 07 | 87 | |||||
| 71 // 2 | 00 | 01 | 98 | |||||
| 66 // 21 | 00 | 03 | 99 | |||||
| 66 // 22 | 00 | 10 | 54 | |||||
| 66 // 23/1 | 00 | 06 | 38 | |||||
| 66 // 23/2 | 00 | 06 | 09 | |||||
| 66 // 24 | 00 | 11 | 83 | |||||
| 66 // 25 | 00 | 11 | 73 | |||||
| 65 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 65 // 21 | 00 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| 65 // 19 | 00 | 02 | 90 | |||||
| 65 // 22 | 00 | 08 | 67 | |||||
| 65 // 18 | 00 | 08 | 78 | |||||
| 65 // 23 | 00 | 03 | 01 | |||||
| 65 //24 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 65 // 17 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 65 // 16 | 00 | 11 | 50 | |||||
| 124 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 51 | |||||
| 64 // 20 | 00 | 10 | 74 | |||||
| 64 // 19 | 00 | 12 | 13 | |||||
| 64 // 18 | 00 | 11 | 75 | |||||
| 64 // 13 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 64 // 14 | 00 | 03 | 28 | |||||
| 64 // 17 | 00 | 08 | 77 | |||||
| 64 // 15 | 00 | 02 | 07 | |||||
| 64 // 16 | 00 | 01 | 27 | |||||
| 10 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | गडी फ़तेह खां | 273 | 5 // 15 | 00 | 06 | 19 |
| 5 // 6 | 00 | 01 | 79 | |||||
| 4 // 11/1 | 00 | 00 | 87 | |||||
| 4 // 10/2 | 00 | 12 | 26 | |||||
| 4 // 9 | 00 | 12 | 76 | |||||
| 4 // 2/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 4 // 8/2 | 00 | 04 | 16 | |||||
| 4 // 8/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 4 // 3/1 | 00 | 06 | 76 | |||||
| 4 // 3/2 | 00 | 01 | 13 | |||||
| 4 // 4 | 00 | 08 | 19 | |||||
| 11 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | पलीयां खुर्द | 225 | 37 // 24 | 00 | 03 | 41 |
| 37 // 17 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |||||
| 37 // 16 | 00 | 00 | 82 | |||||
| 12 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | पलीयाँ कलां | 226 | 39 // 16/2 | 00 | 09 | 33 |
| 39 // 16/1 | 00 | 00 | 91 | |||||
| 39 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 11 | 00 | 14 | 28 | |||||
| 38 // 10/2 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |||||
| 53/3 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 12 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 38 // 9 | 00 | 13 | 21 | |||||
| 38 // 2 | 00 | 00 | 50 | |||||
| 38 // 8 | 00 | 01 | 23 | |||||
| 38 // 3 | 00 | 14 | 62 | |||||
| 38 // 4 | 00 | 01 | 10 | |||||
| 35 // 23 | 00 | 00 | 62 | |||||
| 35 // 24 | 00 | 14 | 60 | |||||
| 35 // 25 | 00 | 00 | 65 | |||||
| 35 // 17 | 00 | 00 | 99 | |||||
| 35 // 16 | 00 | 13 | 27 | |||||
| 35 // 15/3 | 00 | 01 | 88 | |||||
| 36 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 36 // 11/2 | 00 | 11 | 06 | |||||
| 36 // 10/1/2 | 00 | 00 | 72 | |||||
| 36 // 9/2 | 00 | 00 | 97 | |||||
| 36 // 9/1 | 00 | 06 | 81 | |||||
| 36 // 26 | 00 | 00 | 37 | |||||
| 13 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | रामरायपुर | 155 | 613 | 00 | 05 | 31 |
| 674 | 00 | 06 | 10 | |||||
| 673 | 00 | 08 | 77 | |||||
| 676 | 00 | 05 | 75 | |||||
| 677 | 00 | 04 | 20 | |||||
| 678 | 00 | 04 | 19 | |||||
| 679 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 683 | 00 | 05 | 27 | |||||
| 682 | 00 | 03 | 46 | |||||
| 681 | 00 | 01 | 00 | |||||
| 695 | 00 | 04 | 75 | |||||
| 692 | 00 | 04 | 26 | |||||
| 694 | 00 | 02 | 45 | |||||
| 693 | 00 | 06 | 64 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 14 | |||||
| 774 | 00 | 03 | 59 | |||||
| 773 | 00 | 10 | 56 | |||||
| 772 | 00 | 09 | 05 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 68 | |||||
| 756 | 00 | 09 | 31 | |||||
| 758 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 755 | 00 | 06 | 42 | |||||
| 759 | 00 | 03 | 18 | |||||
| 754 | 00 | 02 | 22 | |||||
| 753 | 00 | 07 | 10 | |||||
| 740 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 743 | 00 | 09 | 48 | |||||
| 742 | 00 | 08 | 40 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 98 | |||||
| 425 | 00 | 09 | 80 | |||||
| 421 | 00 | 09 | 61 | |||||
| 422 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 403 | 00 | 09 | 45 | |||||
| 367 | 00 | 08 | 03 | |||||
| 366 | 00 | 02 | 50 | |||||
| 365 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 14 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | सजावलपुर | 154 | 591 | 00 | 00 | 97 |
| 579 | 00 | 07 | 58 | |||||
| 578 | 00 | 08 | 85 | |||||
| 573 | 00 | 03 | 51 | |||||
| 574 | 00 | 04 | 92 | |||||
| 572 | 00 | 13 | 03 | |||||
| 558 | 00 | 07 | 56 | |||||
| 557 | 00 | 03 | 63 | |||||
| 778/556 | 00 | 02 | 93 | |||||
| 777/556 | 00 | 00 | 86 | |||||
| 535/1 | 00 | 01 | 94 | |||||
| 535 | 00 | 09 | 80 | |||||
| 534 | 00 | 08 | 64 | |||||
| 533 | 00 | 03 | 91 | |||||
| 530 | 00 | 01 | 00 | |||||
| 529 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 525 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 526 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 524 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 15 | एस. बी. एस. नगर | नवांशहर | सिहबाजपुर | 227 | 2498 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 58 |
| 2463 | 00 | 06 | 47 | |||||
| 2464 | 00 | 13 | 10 | |||||
| 2465 | 00 | 02 | 84 | |||||
| 2467 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2466 | 00 | 10 | 31 | |||||
| 2473 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 76 | |||||
| 2475 | 00 | 11 | 67 | |||||
| 2474 | 00 | 04 | 71 | |||||
| 2670/2479 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 2669/2479 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 2482 | 00 | 06 | 94 | |||||
| 2480 | 00 | 06 | 89 | |||||
| 2488 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2487 | 00 | 04 | 53 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 24 | |||||
| 2486 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2333 | 00 | 00 | 85 | |||||
| 2324 | 00 | 11 | 79 | |||||
| 2325 | 00 | 06 | 03 | |||||
| 2323 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 08 | |||||
| 2319 | 00 | 06 | 40 | |||||
| 2320 | 00 | 12 | 25 | |||||
| 2314 | 00 | 01 | 50 | |||||
| 2321 | 00 | 00 | 36 | |||||
| 2313 | 00 | 13 | 91 | |||||
| 2312 | 00 | 08 | 99 | |||||
| 2309 रास्ता | 00 | 04 | 83 | |||||
| 2298 | 00 | 01 | 24 | |||||
| 2297 | 00 | 07 | 97 | |||||
| 2296 | 00 | 06 | 30 | |||||
| 2295 | 00 | 08 | 16 | |||||
| 2294 | 00 | 08 | 35 | |||||
| 2289 | 00 | 06 | 48 | |||||
| 2290 | 00 | 07 | 49 | |||||
| 1856/508 | 00 | 01 | 32 | |||||
| 2245 | 00 | 09 | 40 | |||||
| 2165 | 00 | 11 | 82 | |||||
| 2164 | 00 | 10 | 45 | |||||
| 2163 | 00 | 13 | 86 | |||||
| 2162 | 00 | 05 | 67 | |||||
| 2140 | 00 | 09 | 01 | |||||
| 2145 | 00 | 00 | 25 | |||||
| 2144 | 00 | 08 | 07 | |||||
| 2143 | 00 | 04 | 70 | |||||
| 2142 | 00 | 00 | 33 | |||||
| 2098 | 00 | 00 | 79 | |||||
| 2105 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 31 | |||||
| 2125 | 00 | 10 | 28 | |||||
| 2120 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2124 | 00 | 02 | 25 | |||||
| 2121 | 00 | 12 | 52 | |||||
| 2118 | 00 | 02 | 14 | |||||
| 2122 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2117 | 00 | 14 | 84 | |||||
| 16 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | धमाई | 163 | 2375/1978 | 00 | 13 | 66 |
| 2374/1978 | 00 | 01 | 79 | |||||
| 1977 | 00 | 04 | 43 | |||||
| 1976 | 00 | 00 | 61 | |||||
| 1973 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 1975 | 00 | 03 | 87 | |||||
| 1935 | 00 | 27 | 76 | |||||
| 1936 | 00 | 01 | 54 | |||||
| 1937/2368 | 00 | 04 | 42 | |||||
| 1938 | 00 | 04 | 25 | |||||
| 1947 | 00 | 01 | 59 | |||||
| 2368/1943 | 00 | 07 | 34 | |||||
| 1939 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 1940 | 00 | 03 | 75 | |||||
| 17 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | रामगड | 162 | 371 | 00 | 06 | 85 |
| 370 | 00 | 00 | 41 | |||||
| 689/373 | 00 | 00 | 80 | |||||
| 690/373 | 00 | 04 | 23 | |||||
| 682/368 | 00 | 01 | 40 | |||||
| 683/368 | 00 | 06 | 50 | |||||
| 375 | 00 | 06 | 11 | |||||
| 376 | 00 | 01 | 11 | |||||
| 366 | 00 | 06 | 79 | |||||
| 365 | 00 | 07 | 49 | |||||
| 364 | 00 | 00 | 75 | |||||
| 363 | 00 | 05 | 67 | |||||
| 379 | 00 | 06 | 80 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 17 | |||||
| 401 | 00 | 04 | 37 | |||||
| 400 | 00 | 11 | 44 | |||||
| 399 | 00 | 02 | 19 | |||||
| 389 | 00 | 11 | 91 | |||||
| 388 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 55 | |||||
| 391 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 510 | 00 | 00 | 57 | |||||
| 508 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |||||
| 509 | 00 | 12 | 23 | |||||
| 571/515 | 00 | 03 | 77 | |||||
| 516 | 00 | 08 | 07 | |||||
| 575/517 | 00 | 01 | 88 | |||||
| 522 | 00 | 02 | 05 | |||||
| 518 | 00 | 10 | 74 | |||||
| 519 | 00 | 01 | 24 | |||||
| 520 | 00 | 02 | 88 | |||||
| 506 | 00 | 00 | 48 | |||||
| 18 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | मौजूपुर | 250 | 237 | 00 | 08 | 46 |
| 236 | 00 | 10 | 69 | |||||
| 235 | 00 | 11 | 58 | |||||
| 150 | 00 | 03 | 15 | |||||
| 487/151 | 00 | 08 | 70 | |||||
| 488/151 | 00 | 01 | 09 | |||||
| 489/152 | 00 | 00 | 41 | |||||
| 490/152 | 00 | 05 | 41 | |||||
| 153 | 00 | 02 | 00 | |||||
| 441/439 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 442/439 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 19 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | क ु नैल | 364 | 426 | 00 | 09 | 04 |
| 380 | 00 | 13 | 09 | |||||
| 425 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |||||
| 423 | 00 | 09 | 20 | |||||
| 417 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 418 | 00 | 03 | 87 | |||||
| 419 | 00 | 03 | 24 | |||||
| 422/2 | 00 | 06 | 78 | |||||
| 420 | 00 | 01 | 71 | |||||
| 422/1 | 00 | 16 | 11 | |||||
| 399 | 00 | 03 | 13 | |||||
| 398 | 00 | 02 | 44 | |||||
| 397 | 00 | 00 | 78 | |||||
| 396 | 00 | 05 | 33 | |||||
| 395 | 00 | 01 | 59 | |||||
| 400 | 00 | 03 | 58 | |||||
| 401/2 | 00 | 05 | 64 | |||||
| 394 | 00 | 00 | 25 | |||||
| 393/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 401/1 | 00 | 06 | 07 | |||||
| 339/2 | 00 | 05 | 56 | |||||
| 339/1 | 00 | 16 | 49 | |||||
| 335 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 336 | 00 | 07 | 76 | |||||
| 20 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | बारापुर | 361 | 86 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 42 |
| 36 // 11 | 00 | 03 | 78 | |||||
| 37 // 15/2 | 00 | 03 | 43 | |||||
| 37 // 15/1 | 00 | 01 | 32 | |||||
| 37 // 6 | 00 | 12 | 93 | |||||
| 37 // 7/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 37 // 5/2 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 37 // 5/1 | 00 | 01 | 99 | |||||
| 37 // 4 | 00 | 10 | 77 | |||||
| 30 // 24/2 | 00 | 05 | 72 | |||||
| 30 // 23/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 318 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 71 | |||||
| 30 // 24/1 | 00 | 01 | 83 | |||||
| 30 // 23/2 | 00 | 04 | 11 | |||||
| 30 // 18/2 | 00 | 03 | 52 | |||||
| 30 // 18/1 | 00 | 06 | 81 | |||||
| 315 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 80 | |||||
| 30 // 13/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 13/1 | 00 | 03 | 07 | |||||
| 30 // 12/3 | 00 | 06 | 78 | |||||
| 30 // 12/2 | 00 | 04 | 56 | |||||
| 30 // 9/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 9/3 | 00 | 03 | 83 | |||||
| 30 // 9/5 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 30 // 9/1 | 00 | 02 | 89 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 02 | 22 | |||||
| 30 // 9/4 | 00 | 01 | 87 | |||||
| 30 // 2/3 | 00 | 00 | 58 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 2/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 2/1 | 00 | 09 | 90 | |||||
| 30 // 1 | 00 | 00 | 21 | |||||
| 19 // 22/3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 19 // 21/2 | 00 | 02 | 39 | |||||
| 19 // 22/1 | 00 | 00 | 38 | |||||
| 19 // 21/1 | 00 | 06 | 18 | |||||
| 19 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 90 | |||||
| 19 // 11 | 00 | 10 | 95 | |||||
| 19 // 10 | 00 | 02 | 23 | |||||
| रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 20 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 342 रास्ता | 00 | 02 | 74 | |||||
| 20 // 6 | 00 | 07 | 24 | |||||
| 20 // 5/2 | 00 | 06 | 01 | |||||
| 20 // 5/1 | 00 | 05 | 55 | |||||
| 12 // 25/2 | 00 | 06 | 10 | |||||
| 12 // 25/1 | 00 | 05 | 65 | |||||
| 12 // 28 | 00 | 00 | 65 | |||||
| 12 // 24 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 12 // 16/2 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 12 // 16/3 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |||||
| 12 // 17 | 00 | 07 | 38 | |||||
| 12 // 14/2 | 00 | 10 | 22 | |||||
| 89 रास्ता | 00 | 01 | 77 | |||||
| 12 // 7 | 00 | 11 | 44 | |||||
| 283 रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 12 // 4/3 | 00 | 02 | 19 | |||||
| 12 // 4/2 | 00 | 10 | 89 | |||||
| 12 // 5 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 6 // 24 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |||||
| 6 // 25/1 | 00 | 09 | 24 | |||||
| 6 // 16/2 | 00 | 01 | 97 | |||||
| 6 // 16/1 | 00 | 10 | 16 | |||||
| 6 // 15 | 00 | 06 | 24 | |||||
| 5 // 11 | 00 | 04 | 44 | |||||
| 6 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 10 | 00 | 06 | 80 | |||||
| 21 | होिशयारपुर | गढ़शंकर | गदीवाल | 483 | 5 // 4 | 00 | 04 | 52 |
| 1 // 24/4 | 00 | 03 | 38 | |||||
| 1 // 24/3 | 00 | 06 | 39 | |||||
| 1 // 25/1 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 1 // 17/1 | 00 | 00 | 93 | |||||
| 1 // 16/2 | 00 | 05 | 61 | |||||
| 110 रास्ता | 00 | 00 | 90 | |||||
| 1 // 16/1/2 | 00 | 01 | 89 | |||||
| 1 // 16/1/1 | 00 | 02 | 27 | |||||
| 1 // 15/3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 1 // 15/2 | 00 | 09 | 05 | |||||
| 2 // 11 | 00 | 00 | 24 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/1/2018-ओआर-I/ई-21789]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 4th January, 2018
S.O. 50.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette No. 35 dated 02.09.2017, S.O. No. 2016 dated 23.08.2017 Part-II, section 3, sub-section (ii) issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil – Nawanshahr of District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar and Tehsil – Garhshankar of District Hoshiarpur in Punjab State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum product from village Jhungian in the State of Punjab, District Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar to village Pekhubela in the State of Himachal Pradesh, District Una by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "PAJPL - Una Branch pipeline project".
And whereas the copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public on 23.11.2017
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
100 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
India Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to pipeline.
SCHEDULE
| State : Punjab | ||||||||
| Sr. No. | Name of District | Name of Tehsil | Name of Village | Hadbast No. | Murabba // Killa OR Khasara No. | Area | ||
| Hectare Are | Sq. mtr. | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 1 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Jhungian | 285 | 12 // 1 | 00 | 03 | 18 |
| 6 // 25/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 21 | 00 | 08 | 79 | |||||
| 5 // 22 | 00 | 13 | 17 | |||||
| 5 // 23 | 00 | 04 | 55 | |||||
| 5 // 19/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 18/2 | 00 | 08 | 30 | |||||
| 5 // 17/1 | 00 | 01 | 76 | |||||
| 5 // 17/2 | 00 | 11 | 23 | |||||
| 5 // 16 | 00 | 08 | 79 | |||||
| 5 // 15 | 00 | 03 | 55 | |||||
| 4 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 4 // 11 | 00 | 12 | 93 | |||||
| 4 // 12 | 00 | 12 | 08 | |||||
| 4 // 13 | 00 | 03 | 01 | |||||
| 4 // 9/1 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 4 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 82 | |||||
| 4 // 7 | 00 | 06 | 65 | |||||
| 38 Rasta | 00 | 02 | 46 | |||||
| 2 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Julah Majra | 286 | 54 // 8 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 79/1 Rasta | 00 | 00 | 32 | |||||
| 54 // 7 | 00 | 07 | 76 | |||||
| 54 // 4 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 54 // 6 | 00 | 01 | 69 | |||||
| 54 // 5/2 | 00 | 12 | 50 | |||||
| 53 //1 | 00 | 00 | 83 | |||||
| 3 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Khoja | 284 | 22 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 21 // 1 | 00 | 11 | 55 | |||||
| 21 // 2 | 00 | 01 | 60 | |||||
| 9 // 21 | 00 | 01 | 13 | |||||
| 9 // 22 | 00 | 11 | 27 | |||||
| 9 // 23 | 00 | 12 | 69 | |||||
| 9 // 24 | 00 | 07 | 50 | |||||
| 9 // 17 | 00 | 05 | 80 | |||||
| 9 // 16 | 00 | 13 | 26 | |||||
| 10 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 79 | |||||
| 10 // 11 | 00 | 00 | 61 | |||||
| 10 // 12 | 00 | 10 | 33 | |||||
| 10 // 19 | 00 | 02 | 30 | |||||
| 10 // 13 | 00 | 13 | 01 | |||||
| 10 // 14 | 00 | 07 | 84 | |||||
| 10 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 10 // 7 | 00 | 05 | 05 | |||||
| 10 // 6 | 00 | 12 | 59 | |||||
| 11 // 10 | 00 | 12 | 44 | |||||
| 11 // 9 | 00 | 03 | 23 | |||||
| 11 // 1 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 11 // 2 | 00 | 09 | 88 | |||||
| 11 // 3 | 00 | 12 | 46 | |||||
| 11 // 4 | 00 | 09 | 31 | |||||
| 11 // 5 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 7 // 24 | 00 | 03 | 91 | |||||
| 7 // 25 | 00 | 13 | 31 | |||||
| 6 // 21 | 00 | 11 | 13 | |||||
| 6 // 22 | 00 | 00 | 79 | |||||
| 6 // 20 | 00 | 01 | 70 | |||||
| 6 // 19 | 00 | 11 | 60 | |||||
| 6 // 18 | 00 | 12 | 86 | |||||
| 6 // 17 | 00 | 06 | 48 | |||||
| 6 // 14 | 00 | 06 | 35 | |||||
| 6 // 15 | 00 | 12 | 99 | |||||
| 5 // 11/1 | 00 | 08 | 72 | |||||
| 5 // 11/2 | 00 | 00 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 11/3 | 00 | 02 | 53 | |||||
| 98 Rasta | 00 | 00 | 82 | |||||
| 5 // 28 | 00 | 01 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 12/1 | 00 | 02 | 08 | |||||
| 5 // 12/2 | 00 | 00 | 98 | |||||
| 5 // 9/2 | 00 | 08 | 58 | |||||
| 62 | 00 | 01 | 55 | |||||
| 5 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 64 | |||||
| 5 // 7 | 00 | 12 | 28 | |||||
| 5 // 6 | 00 | 11 | 14 | |||||
| 4 // 10/2/1 | 00 | 05 | 80 | |||||
| 4 // 10/2/2 | 00 | 03 | 89 | |||||
| 4 // 10/1 | 00 | 02 | 71 | |||||
| 4 // 9 | 00 | 06 | 63 | |||||
| 4 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Tajpur | 283 | 27 // 2 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 27 // 9 | 00 | 02 | 43 | |||||
| 27 // 3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 27 // 4 | 00 | 07 | 68 | |||||
| 27 // 5 | 00 | 11 | 55 | |||||
| 27 // 8 | 00 | 09 | 51 | |||||
| 27 // 7 | 00 | 04 | 82 | |||||
| 27 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 78 | |||||
| 26 // 1 | 00 | 12 | 76 | |||||
| 26 // 2/1 | 00 | 06 | 07 | |||||
| 46 Rasta | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 45 Rasta | 00 | 02 | 47 | |||||
| 26 // 2/3 | 00 | 03 | 96 | |||||
| 26 // 3 | 00 | 07 | 55 | |||||
| 5 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Lalewal | 282 | 6 // 3 | 00 | 04 | 53 |
| 6 // 4 | 00 | 12 | 31 | |||||
| 6 // 5 | 00 | 07 | 27 | |||||
| 1 // 25 | 00 | 06 | 01 | |||||
| 2 // 21 | 00 | 08 | 86 | |||||
| 6 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Garhi Bharti | 218 | 55 // 6 | 00 | 09 | 62 |
| 85 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 21 | |||||
| 56 // 10 | 00 | 13 | 76 | |||||
| 7 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Bharta Kalan | 219 | 53 // 9 | 00 | 09 | 98 |
| 53 // 8 | 00 | 12 | 19 | |||||
| 53 // 7 | 00 | 12 | 09 | |||||
| 53 // 4 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 53 // 5 | 00 | 02 | 02 | |||||
| 53 // 6 | 00 | 10 | 30 | |||||
| 52 // 1 | 00 | 06 | 84 | |||||
| 52 // 10 | 00 | 05 | 29 | |||||
| 52 // 2 | 00 | 11 | 40 | |||||
| 52 // 9 | 00 | 00 | 53 | |||||
| 52 // 3 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 52 // 4/2 | 00 | 12 | 23 | |||||
| 52 // 5/1 | 00 | 05 | 73 | |||||
| 52 // 5/2 | 00 | 03 | 41 | |||||
| 52 // 5/3 | 00 | 03 | 16 | |||||
| 51 // 1/1 | 00 | 01 | 41 | |||||
| 51 // 1/2 | 00 | 09 | 00 | |||||
| 51 // 2/1 | 00 | 09 | 81 | |||||
| 51 // 2/2 | 00 | 02 | 32 | |||||
| 51 // 3/1 | 00 | 11 | 95 | |||||
| 51 // 4 | 00 | 08 | 00 | |||||
| 51 // 5 | 00 | 01 | 12 | |||||
| 46 // 23 | 00 | 00 | 39 | |||||
| 46 // 24 | 00 | 06 | 06 | |||||
| 46 // 25 | 00 | 11 | 51 | |||||
| 47 // 21 | 00 | 11 | 40 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 01 | 06 | |||||
| 47 // 22 | 00 | 12 | 37 | |||||
| 47 // 23 | 00 | 11 | 73 | |||||
| 47 // 18 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 47 // 17 | 00 | 03 | 90 | |||||
| 47 // 24 | 00 | 08 | 52 | |||||
| 47 // 25 | 00 | 02 | 12 | |||||
| 47 // 16 | 00 | 10 | 27 | |||||
| 48 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 91 | |||||
| 48 // 19/2 | 00 | 11 | 82 | |||||
| 48 // 18 | 00 | 11 | 39 | |||||
| 8 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Dariyapur | 278 | 15 // 18 | 00 | 00 | 68 |
| 15 // 17 | 00 | 11 | 27 | |||||
| 15 // 14 | 00 | 01 | 17 | |||||
| 15 // 15 | 00 | 07 | 20 | |||||
| 15 // 16 | 00 | 05 | 60 | |||||
| 14 // 20/2 | 00 | 00 | 51 | |||||
| 14 // 11/1 | 00 | 03 | 50 | |||||
| 33 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 48 | |||||
| 14 // 11/2 | 00 | 06 | 93 | |||||
| 14 // 20/1/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 14 // 12 | 00 | 12 | 59 | |||||
| 14 // 26 | 00 | 00 | 95 | |||||
| 14 // 13/1 | 00 | 01 | 10 | |||||
| 14 // 13/2 | 00 | 10 | 71 | |||||
| 14 // 14 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 14 // 15 | 00 | 12 | 05 | |||||
| 13 // 11/1 | 00 | 03 | 85 | |||||
| 13 // 10/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 43 Rasta | 00 | 07 | 12 | |||||
| 13 // 10/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 13 // 11/2 | 00 | 05 | 86 | |||||
| 13 // 12 | 00 | 05 | 59 | |||||
| 13 // 13/1 | 00 | 00 | 68 | |||||
| 13 // 9/1 | 00 | 03 | 78 | |||||
| 13 // 8/1 | 00 | 09 | 50 | |||||
| 13 // 7/1 | 00 | 12 | 47 | |||||
| 13 // 6/1 | 00 | 12 | 46 | |||||
| 12 // 26 | 00 | 03 | 35 | |||||
| 12 // 10/1 | 00 | 08 | 90 | |||||
| 12 // 9/1 | 00 | 12 | 88 | |||||
| 12 // 8/1 | 00 | 10 | 63 | |||||
| 12 // 3 | 00 | 01 | 60 | |||||
| 12 // 4 | 00 | 07 | 66 | |||||
| 12 // 5 | 00 | 04 | 26 | |||||
| 12 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 12 // 7/1 | 00 | 04 | 99 | |||||
| 9 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Kahlon | 222 | 69 // 5 | 00 | 07 | 45 |
| 69 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 27 | |||||
| 70 // 1/1 | 00 | 07 | 60 | |||||
| 70 // 1/2 | 00 | 04 | 42 | |||||
| 70 // 2 | 00 | 11 | 94 | |||||
| 70 // 3 | 00 | 10 | 70 | |||||
| 132 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 37 | |||||
| 70 // 4 | 00 | 11 | 85 | |||||
| 70 // 5 | 00 | 11 | 90 | |||||
| 67 // 25 | 00 | 00 | 21 | |||||
| 71 // 1 | 00 | 07 | 87 | |||||
| 71 // 2 | 00 | 01 | 98 | |||||
| 66 // 21 | 00 | 03 | 99 | |||||
| 66 // 22 | 00 | 10 | 54 | |||||
| 66 // 23/1 | 00 | 06 | 38 | |||||
| 66 // 23/2 | 00 | 06 | 09 | |||||
| 66 // 24 | 00 | 11 | 83 | |||||
| 66 // 25 | 00 | 11 | 73 | |||||
| 65 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 65 // 21 | 00 | 10 | 10 | |||||
| 65 // 19 | 00 | 02 | 90 | |||||
| 65 // 22 | 00 | 08 | 67 | |||||
| 65 // 18 | 00 | 08 | 78 | |||||
| 65 // 23 | 00 | 03 | 01 | |||||
| 65 //24 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 65 // 17 | 00 | 12 | 14 | |||||
| 65 // 16 | 00 | 11 | 50 | |||||
| 124 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 51 | |||||
| 64 // 20 | 00 | 10 | 74 | |||||
| 64 // 19 | 00 | 12 | 13 | |||||
| 64 // 18 | 00 | 11 | 75 | |||||
| 64 // 13 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 64 // 14 | 00 | 03 | 28 | |||||
| 64 // 17 | 00 | 08 | 77 | |||||
| 64 // 15 | 00 | 02 | 07 | |||||
| 64 // 16 | 00 | 01 | 27 | |||||
| 10 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Garhi Fateh Khan. | 273 | 5 // 15 | 00 | 06 | 19 |
| 5 // 6 | 00 | 01 | 79 | |||||
| 4 // 11/1 | 00 | 00 | 87 | |||||
| 4 //10/2 | 00 | 12 | 26 | |||||
| 4 // 9 | 00 | 12 | 76 | |||||
| 4 // 2/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 4 // 8/2 | 00 | 04 | 16 | |||||
| 4 // 8/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 4 // 3/1 | 00 | 06 | 76 | |||||
| 4 // 3/2 | 00 | 01 | 13 | |||||
| 4 // 4 | 00 | 08 | 19 | |||||
| 11 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Pallian khurd | 225 | 37 // 24 | 00 | 03 | 41 |
| 37 // 17 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |||||
| 37 // 16 | 00 | 00 | 82 | |||||
| 12 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Pallian Kalan | 226 | 39 // 16/2 | 00 | 09 | 33 |
| 39 // 16/1 | 00 | 00 | 91 | |||||
| 39 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 11 | 00 | 14 | 28 | |||||
| 38 // 10/2 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |||||
| 53/3 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 81 | |||||
| 38 // 12 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 38 // 9 | 00 | 13 | 21 | |||||
| 38 // 2 | 00 | 00 | 50 | |||||
| 38 // 8 | 00 | 01 | 23 | |||||
| 38 // 3 | 00 | 14 | 62 | |||||
| 38 // 4 | 00 | 01 | 10 | |||||
| 35 // 23 | 00 | 00 | 62 | |||||
| 35 // 24 | 00 | 14 | 60 | |||||
| 35 // 25 | 00 | 00 | 65 | |||||
| 35 // 17 | 00 | 00 | 99 | |||||
| 35 // 16 | 00 | 13 | 27 | |||||
| 35 // 15/3 | 00 | 01 | 88 | |||||
| 36 // 20 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 36 // 11/2 | 00 | 11 | 06 | |||||
| 36 // 10/1/2 | 00 | 00 | 72 | |||||
| 36 // 9/2 | 00 | 00 | 97 | |||||
| 36 // 9/1 | 00 | 06 | 81 | |||||
| 36 // 26 | 00 | 00 | 37 | |||||
| 13 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Ramraipur | 155 | 613 | 00 | 05 | 31 |
| 674 | 00 | 06 | 10 | |||||
| 673 | 00 | 08 | 77 | |||||
| 676 | 00 | 05 | 75 | |||||
| 677 | 00 | 04 | 20 | |||||
| 678 | 00 | 04 | 19 | |||||
| 679 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 683 | 00 | 05 | 27 | |||||
| 682 | 00 | 03 | 46 | |||||
| 681 | 00 | 01 | 00 | |||||
| 695 | 00 | 04 | 75 | |||||
| 692 | 00 | 04 | 26 | |||||
| 694 | 00 | 02 | 45 | |||||
| 693 | 00 | 06 | 64 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 01 | 14 | |||||
| 774 | 00 | 03 | 59 | |||||
| 773 | 00 | 10 | 56 | |||||
| 772 | 00 | 09 | 05 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 00 | 68 | |||||
| 756 | 00 | 09 | 31 | |||||
| 758 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 755 | 00 | 06 | 42 | |||||
| 759 | 00 | 03 | 18 | |||||
| 754 | 00 | 02 | 22 | |||||
| 753 | 00 | 07 | 10 | |||||
| 740 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 743 | 00 | 09 | 48 | |||||
| 742 | 00 | 08 | 40 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 00 | 98 | |||||
| 425 | 00 | 09 | 80 | |||||
| 421 | 00 | 09 | 61 | |||||
| 422 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 403 | 00 | 09 | 45 | |||||
| 367 | 00 | 08 | 03 | |||||
| 366 | 00 | 02 | 50 | |||||
| 365 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 14 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Sajawalpur | 154 | 591 | 00 | 00 | 97 |
| 579 | 00 | 07 | 58 | |||||
| 578 | 00 | 08 | 85 | |||||
| 573 | 00 | 03 | 51 | |||||
| 574 | 00 | 04 | 92 | |||||
| 572 | 00 | 13 | 03 | |||||
| 558 | 00 | 07 | 56 | |||||
| 557 | 00 | 03 | 63 | |||||
| 778/556 | 00 | 02 | 93 | |||||
| 777/556 | 00 | 00 | 86 | |||||
| 535/1 | 00 | 01 | 94 | |||||
| 535 | 00 | 09 | 80 | |||||
| 534 | 00 | 08 | 64 | |||||
| 533 | 00 | 03 | 91 | |||||
| 530 | 00 | 01 | 00 | |||||
| 529 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 525 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 526 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 524 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 15 | S.B.S. Nagar | Nawanshahr | Sahbajpur | 227 | 2498 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 58 |
| 2463 | 00 | 06 | 47 | |||||
| 2464 | 00 | 13 | 10 | |||||
| 2465 | 00 | 02 | 84 | |||||
| 2467 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2466 | 00 | 10 | 31 | |||||
| 2473 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 76 | |||||
| 2475 | 00 | 11 | 67 | |||||
| 2474 | 00 | 04 | 71 | |||||
| 2670/2479 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 2669/2479 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 2482 | 00 | 06 | 94 | |||||
| 2480 | 00 | 06 | 89 | |||||
| 2488 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2487 | 00 | 04 | 53 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 00 | 24 | |||||
| 2486 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2333 | 00 | 00 | 85 | |||||
| 2324 | 00 | 11 | 79 | |||||
| 2325 | 00 | 06 | 03 | |||||
| 2323 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 08 | |||||
| 2319 | 00 | 06 | 40 | |||||
| 2320 | 00 | 12 | 25 | |||||
| 2314 | 00 | 01 | 50 | |||||
| 2321 | 00 | 00 | 36 | |||||
| 2313 | 00 | 13 | 91 | |||||
| 2312 | 00 | 08 | 99 | |||||
| 2309 Rasta | 00 | 04 | 83 | |||||
| 2298 | 00 | 01 | 24 | |||||
| 2297 | 00 | 07 | 97 | |||||
| 2296 | 00 | 06 | 30 | |||||
| 2295 | 00 | 08 | 16 | |||||
| 2294 | 00 | 08 | 35 | |||||
| 2289 | 00 | 06 | 48 | |||||
| 2290 | 00 | 07 | 49 | |||||
| 1856/508 | 00 | 01 | 32 | |||||
| 2245 | 00 | 09 | 40 | |||||
| 2165 | 00 | 11 | 82 | |||||
| 2164 | 00 | 10 | 45 | |||||
| 2163 | 00 | 13 | 86 | |||||
| 2162 | 00 | 05 | 67 | |||||
| 2140 | 00 | 09 | 01 | |||||
| 2145 | 00 | 00 | 25 | |||||
| 2144 | 00 | 08 | 07 | |||||
| 2143 | 00 | 04 | 70 | |||||
| 2142 | 00 | 00 | 33 | |||||
| 2098 | 00 | 00 | 79 | |||||
| 2105 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 31 | |||||
| 2125 | 00 | 10 | 28 | |||||
| 2120 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2124 | 00 | 02 | 25 | |||||
| 2121 | 00 | 12 | 52 | |||||
| 2118 | 00 | 02 | 14 | |||||
| 2122 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 2117 | 00 | 14 | 84 | |||||
| 16 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Dhamai | 163 | 2375/1978 | 00 | 13 | 66 |
| 2374/1978 | 00 | 01 | 79 | |||||
| 1977 | 00 | 04 | 43 | |||||
| 1976 | 00 | 00 | 61 | |||||
| 1973 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 1975 | 00 | 03 | 87 | |||||
| 1935 | 00 | 27 | 76 | |||||
| 1936 | 00 | 01 | 54 | |||||
| 1937/2368 | 00 | 04 | 42 | |||||
| 1938 | 00 | 04 | 25 | |||||
| 1947 | 00 | 01 | 59 | |||||
| 2368/1943 | 00 | 07 | 34 | |||||
| 1939 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 1940 | 00 | 03 | 75 | |||||
| 17 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Ramgarh | 162 | 371 | 00 | 06 | 85 |
| 370 | 00 | 00 | 41 | |||||
| 689/373 | 00 | 00 | 80 | |||||
| 690/373 | 00 | 04 | 23 | |||||
| 682/368 | 00 | 01 | 40 | |||||
| 683/368 | 00 | 06 | 50 | |||||
| 375 | 00 | 06 | 11 | |||||
| 376 | 00 | 01 | 11 | |||||
| 366 | 00 | 06 | 79 | |||||
| 365 | 00 | 07 | 49 | |||||
| 364 | 00 | 00 | 75 | |||||
| 363 | 00 | 05 | 67 | |||||
| 379 | 00 | 06 | 80 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 01 | 17 | |||||
| 401 | 00 | 04 | 37 | |||||
| 400 | 00 | 11 | 44 | |||||
| 399 | 00 | 02 | 19 | |||||
| 389 | 00 | 11 | 91 | |||||
| 388 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 01 | 55 | |||||
| 391 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 510 | 00 | 00 | 57 | |||||
| 508 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |||||
| 509 | 00 | 12 | 23 | |||||
| 571/515 | 00 | 03 | 77 | |||||
| 516 | 00 | 08 | 07 | |||||
| 575/517 | 00 | 01 | 88 | |||||
| 522 | 00 | 02 | 05 | |||||
| 518 | 00 | 10 | 74 | |||||
| 519 | 00 | 01 | 24 | |||||
| 520 | 00 | 02 | 88 | |||||
| 506 | 00 | 00 | 48 | |||||
| 18 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Maujupur | 250 | 237 | 00 | 08 | 46 |
| 236 | 00 | 10 | 69 | |||||
| 235 | 00 | 11 | 58 | |||||
| 150 | 00 | 03 | 15 | |||||
| 487/151 | 00 | 08 | 70 | |||||
| 488/151 | 00 | 01 | 09 | |||||
| 489/152 | 00 | 00 | 41 | |||||
| 490/152 | 00 | 05 | 41 | |||||
| 153 | 00 | 02 | 00 | |||||
| 441/439 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 442/439 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 19 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Kunail | 364 | 426 | 00 | 09 | 04 |
| 380 | 00 | 13 | 09 | |||||
| 425 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |||||
| 423 | 00 | 09 | 20 | |||||
| 417 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 418 | 00 | 03 | 87 | |||||
| 419 | 00 | 03 | 24 | |||||
| 422/2 | 00 | 06 | 78 | |||||
| 420 | 00 | 01 | 71 | |||||
| 422/1 | 00 | 16 | 11 | |||||
| 399 | 00 | 03 | 13 | |||||
| 398 | 00 | 02 | 44 | |||||
| 397 | 00 | 00 | 78 | |||||
| 396 | 00 | 05 | 33 | |||||
| 395 | 00 | 01 | 59 | |||||
| 400 | 00 | 03 | 58 | |||||
| 401/2 | 00 | 05 | 64 | |||||
| 394 | 00 | 00 | 25 | |||||
| 393/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 401/1 | 00 | 06 | 07 | |||||
| 339/2 | 00 | 05 | 56 | |||||
| 339/1 | 00 | 16 | 49 | |||||
| 335 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 336 | 00 | 07 | 76 | |||||
| 20 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Barapur | 361 | 86 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 42 |
| 36 // 11 | 00 | 03 | 78 | |||||
| 37 // 15/2 | 00 | 03 | 43 | |||||
| 37 // 15/1 | 00 | 01 | 32 | |||||
| 37 // 6 | 00 | 12 | 93 | |||||
| 37 // 7/1 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 37 // 5/2 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |||||
| 37 // 5/1 | 00 | 01 | 99 | |||||
| 37 // 4 | 00 | 10 | 77 | |||||
| 30 // 24/2 | 00 | 05 | 72 | |||||
| 30 // 23/3 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 318 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 71 | |||||
| 30 // 24/1 | 00 | 01 | 83 | |||||
| 30 // 23/2 | 00 | 04 | 11 | |||||
| 30 // 18/2 | 00 | 03 | 52 | |||||
| 30 // 18/1 | 00 | 06 | 81 | |||||
| 315 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 80 | |||||
| 30 // 13/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 13/1 | 00 | 03 | 07 | |||||
| 30 // 12/3 | 00 | 06 | 78 | |||||
| 30 // 12/2 | 00 | 04 | 56 | |||||
| 30 // 9/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 9/3 | 00 | 03 | 83 | |||||
| 30 // 9/5 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |||||
| 30 // 9/1 | 00 | 02 | 89 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 02 | 22 | |||||
| 30 // 9/4 | 00 | 01 | 87 | |||||
| 30 // 2/3 | 00 | 00 | 58 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 2/2 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 30 // 2/1 | 00 | 09 | 90 | |||||
| 30 // 1 | 00 | 00 | 21 | |||||
| 19 // 22/3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 19 // 21/2 | 00 | 02 | 39 | |||||
| 19 // 22/1 | 00 | 00 | 38 | |||||
| 19 // 21/1 | 00 | 06 | 18 | |||||
| 19 // 20 | 00 | 11 | 90 | |||||
| 19 // 11 | 00 | 10 | 95 | |||||
| 19 // 10 | 00 | 02 | 23 | |||||
| Rasta | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 20 // 15 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 342 Rasta | 00 | 02 | 74 | |||||
| 20 // 6 | 00 | 07 | 24 | |||||
| 20 // 5/2 | 00 | 06 | 01 | |||||
| 20 // 5/1 | 00 | 05 | 55 | |||||
| 12 // 25/2 | 00 | 06 | 10 | |||||
| 12 // 25/1 | 00 | 05 | 65 | |||||
| 12 // 28 | 00 | 00 | 65 | |||||
| 12 // 24 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 12 // 16/2 | 00 | 00 | 26 | |||||
| 12 // 16/3 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |||||
| 12 // 17 | 00 | 07 | 38 | |||||
| 12 // 14/2 | 00 | 10 | 22 | |||||
| 89 Rasta | 00 | 01 | 77 | |||||
| 12 // 7 | 00 | 11 | 44 | |||||
| 283 Rasta | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 12 // 4/3 | 00 | 02 | 19 | |||||
| 12 // 4/2 | 00 | 10 | 89 | |||||
| 12 // 5 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 6 // 24 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |||||
| 6 // 25/1 | 00 | 09 | 24 | |||||
| 6 // 16/2 | 00 | 01 | 97 | |||||
| 6 // 16/1 | 00 | 10 | 16 | |||||
| 6 // 15 | 00 | 06 | 24 | |||||
| 5 // 11 | 00 | 04 | 44 | |||||
| 6 // 6 | 00 | 00 | 20 | |||||
| 5 // 10 | 00 | 06 | 80 | |||||
| 21 | Hoshiarpur | Garhshankar | Gaddiwal | 483 | 5 // 4 | 00 | 04 | 52 |
| 1 // 24/4 | 00 | 03 | 38 | |||||
| 1 // 24/3 | 00 | 06 | 39 | |||||
| 1 // 25/1 | 00 | 01 | 44 | |||||
| 1 // 17/1 | 00 | 00 | 93 | |||||
| 1 // 16/2 | 00 | 05 | 61 | |||||
| 110 Rasta | 00 | 00 | 90 | |||||
| 1 // 16/1/2 | 00 | 01 | 89 | |||||
| 1 // 16/1/1 | 00 | 02 | 27 | |||||
| 1 // 15/3 | 00 | 02 | 73 | |||||
| 1 // 15/2 | 00 | 09 | 05 | |||||
| 2 // 11 | 00 | 00 | 24 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/1/2018-OR-I/E-21789]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 51515151....———— के न्6ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्6ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाबT अनुसूची में वNर्णत है और जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्6ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई (cid:142)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वNर्णत भूमि में हितबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं , इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के िलए उस में उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में 8ी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील - एरसमा | िजला - जगतसिंहपुर | राज्य - ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| पाणिगड़िआकन्धा | 326 | 00 | 01 | 00 |
| 327 | 00 | 00 | 45 | |
| 290 | 00 | 10 | 72 | |
| 291 | 00 | 01 | 92 | |
| 292/793 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 293 | 00 | 02 | 56 | |
| 295 | 00 | 03 | 70 | |
| 296 | 00 | 01 | 85 | |
| 297 | 00 | 01 | 50 | |
| 298 | 00 | 02 | 88 | |
| 299 | 00 | 02 | 34 | |
| 257 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 278 | 00 | 00 | 16 | |
| 276 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 274 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |
| 273 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |
| 272 | 00 | 04 | 00 | |
| 269/777 | 00 | 03 | 28 | |
| 260 | 00 | 01 | 45 | |
| 266 | 00 | 00 | 74 | |
| 239/978 | 00 | 04 | 68 | |
| 239 | 00 | 03 | 39 | |
| 238 | 00 | 01 | 48 | |
| 238/945 | 00 | 04 | 52 | |
| 239/977 | 00 | 02 | 00 | |
| 234 | 00 | 13 | 30 | |
| 235/747 | 00 | 01 | 20 | |
| 235 | 00 | 03 | 90 | |
| 210 | 00 | 29 | 00 | |
| 267 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |
| 233/779 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |
| 238/946 | 00 | 00 | 56 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव117 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 51.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : ERASAMA | District : JAGATSINGHPUR | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| PANIGARIAKANDHA | 326 | 00 | 01 | 00 |
| 327 | 00 | 00 | 45 | |
| 290 | 00 | 10 | 72 | |
| 291 | 00 | 01 | 92 | |
| 292/793 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 293 | 00 | 02 | 56 | |
| 295 | 00 | 03 | 70 | |
| 296 | 00 | 01 | 85 | |
| 297 | 00 | 01 | 50 | |
| 298 | 00 | 02 | 88 | |
| 299 | 00 | 02 | 34 | |
| 257 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 278 | 00 | 00 | 16 | |
| 276 | 00 | 02 | 52 | |
| 274 | 00 | 02 | 95 | |
| 273 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |
| 272 | 00 | 04 | 00 | |
| 269/777 | 00 | 03 | 28 | |
| 260 | 00 | 01 | 45 | |
| 266 | 00 | 00 | 74 | |
| 239/978 | 00 | 04 | 68 | |
| 239 | 00 | 03 | 39 | |
| 238 | 00 | 01 | 48 | |
| 238/945 | 00 | 04 | 52 | |
| 239/977 | 00 | 02 | 00 | |
| 234 | 00 | 13 | 30 | |
| 235/747 | 00 | 01 | 20 | |
| 235 | 00 | 03 | 90 | |
| 210 | 00 | 29 | 00 | |
| 267 | 00 | 00 | 28 | |
| 233/779 | 00 | 00 | 22 | |
| 238/946 | 00 | 00 | 56 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 52525252....————के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1068(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : द्वारका ति(cid:140)मला जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी ग(cid:144) थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए:
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कापOरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
| अनुसूची | |||||
| िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्L प्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| द्वारका तिमला | जगन्नाधपुरम | 4/3 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
| 4/2A | 00 | 14 | 81 | ||
| 4/2B | 00 | 07 | 71 | ||
| 4/2C | 00 | 08 | 51 | ||
| 4/1 | 00 | 00 | 16 | ||
| 10/1 | 00 | 55 | 51 | ||
| 10/2 | 00 | 10 | 01 | ||
| 3/6 | 00 | 03 | 98 | ||
| 11/2 | 00 | 12 | 96 | ||
| 11/1 | 00 | 16 | 71 | ||
| 15/1 | 00 | 00 | 23 | ||
| द्वारका तिमला | जी. कोत्तापल्ली | 20/1 | 00 | 16 | 25 |
| 11 | 00 | 23 | 56 | ||
| 10/4 | 00 | 05 | 93 | ||
| 10/2J | 00 | 05 | 47 | ||
| 10/2E | 00 | 05 | 56 | ||
| 10/2D | 00 | 05 | 17 | ||
| 10/1B/4 | 00 | 03 | 06 | ||
| 10/1B/3-2 | 00 | 09 | 60 | ||
| 8/1C | 00 | 21 | 19 | ||
| 8/1E | 00 | 03 | 64 | ||
| 1/6 | 00 | 10 | 59 | ||
| 1/3 | 00 | 10 | 15 | ||
| 1/5 | 00 | 08 | 64 | ||
| 1/4 | 00 | 10 | 05 | ||
| 2/2 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 2/1 | 00 | 00 | 05 | ||
| 3/1 | 00 | 18 | 97 | ||
| द्वारका तिमला | कोडीगुडेम | 280/1 | 00 | 11 | 55 |
| 279 | 00 | 43 | 39 | ||
| 281 | 00 | 23 | 13 | ||
| 282/2 | 00 | 12 | 67 | ||
| 282/1 | 00 | 00 | 25 | ||
| 289/1 | 00 | 30 | 01 | ||
| 288/5 | 00 | 09 | 78 | ||
| 288/3 | 00 | 01 | 53 | ||
| 288/4 | 00 | 16 | 82 | ||
| 292/2 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 292/1 | 00 | 15 | 39 | ||
| 79/2 | 00 | 20 | 63 | ||
| 78/1 | 00 | 33 | 04 | ||
| 73 | 00 | 46 | 74 | ||
| 77 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 76 | 00 | 34 | 72 | ||
| 66 | 00 | 02 | 13 | ||
| 65 | 00 | 39 | 72 | ||
| 63 | 00 | 19 | 91 | ||
| 64 | 00 | 01 | 63 | ||
| द्वारका तिमला | च ेिलकिनवारी पोतेपल्ली | 83/3 | 00 | 37 | 89 |
| 82 | 00 | 46 | 60 | ||
| 81/2 | 00 | 11 | 92 | ||
| 81/1 | 00 | 02 | 91 | ||
| 80/5 | 00 | 14 | 69 | ||
| 80/3 | 00 | 09 | 56 | ||
| 80/2 | 00 | 04 | 41 | ||
| 80/1 | 00 | 15 | 00 | ||
| 97/3 | 00 | 15 | 90 | ||
| 97/2 | 00 | 10 | 41 | ||
| 97/1 | 00 | 05 | 63 | ||
| 98/4 | 00 | 00 | 32 | ||
| 100/9 | 00 | 01 | 47 | ||
| 100/8 | 00 | 09 | 98 | ||
| 100/7 | 00 | 07 | 06 | ||
| 100/11 | 00 | 10 | 08 | ||
| 99/7 | 00 | 10 | 60 | ||
| 99/6 | 00 | 09 | 62 | ||
| 99/5 | 00 | 03 | 85 | ||
| 100/6 | 00 | 17 | 63 | ||
| 100/3 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 100/1 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 100/2 | 00 | 08 | 60 | ||
| 101/1C | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 45/4 | 00 | 36 | 21 | ||
| 45/2 | 00 | 22 | 42 | ||
| 44/5 | 00 | 02 | 73 | ||
| 44/4 | 00 | 10 | 88 | ||
| 44/6 | 00 | 05 | 53 | ||
| 44/2 | 00 | 05 | 40 | ||
| 44/1 | 00 | 06 | 30 | ||
| 37/2F | 00 | 11 | 98 | ||
| 38/2 | 00 | 41 | 25 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 52 .— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1068 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Dwaraka Tirumala, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
122 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District : West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Dwaraka Tirumala | Jagannadhapuram | 4/3 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
| 4/2A | 00 | 14 | 81 | ||
| 4/2B | 00 | 07 | 71 | ||
| 4/2C | 00 | 08 | 51 | ||
| 4/1 | 00 | 00 | 16 | ||
| 10/1 | 00 | 55 | 51 | ||
| 10/2 | 00 | 10 | 01 | ||
| 3/6 | 00 | 03 | 98 | ||
| 11/2 | 00 | 12 | 96 | ||
| 11/1 | 00 | 16 | 71 | ||
| 15/1 | 00 | 00 | 23 | ||
| Dwaraka Tirumala | G Kottapalli | 20/1 | 00 | 16 | 25 |
| 11 | 00 | 23 | 56 | ||
| 10/4 | 00 | 05 | 93 | ||
| 10/2J | 00 | 05 | 47 | ||
| 10/2E | 00 | 05 | 56 | ||
| 10/2D | 00 | 05 | 17 | ||
| 10/1B/4 | 00 | 03 | 06 | ||
| 10/1B/3-2 | 00 | 09 | 60 | ||
| 8/1C | 00 | 21 | 19 | ||
| 8/1E | 00 | 03 | 64 | ||
| 1/6 | 00 | 10 | 59 | ||
| 1/3 | 00 | 10 | 15 | ||
| 1/5 | 00 | 08 | 64 | ||
| 1/4 | 00 | 10 | 05 | ||
| 2/2 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 2/1 | 00 | 00 | 05 | ||
| 3/1 | 00 | 18 | 97 | ||
| Dwaraka Tirumala | Kodigudem | 280/1 | 00 | 11 | 55 |
| 279 | 00 | 43 | 39 | ||
| 281 | 00 | 23 | 13 | ||
| 282/2 | 00 | 12 | 67 | ||
| 282/1 | 00 | 00 | 25 | ||
| 289/1 | 00 | 30 | 01 | ||
| 288/5 | 00 | 09 | 78 | ||
| 288/3 | 00 | 01 | 53 | ||
| 288/4 | 00 | 16 | 82 | ||
| 292/2 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 292/1 | 00 | 15 | 39 | ||
| 79/2 | 00 | 20 | 63 | ||
| 78/1 | 00 | 33 | 04 | ||
| 73 | 00 | 46 | 74 | ||
| 77 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 76 | 00 | 34 | 72 | ||
| 66 | 00 | 02 | 13 | ||
| 65 | 00 | 39 | 72 | ||
| 63 | 00 | 19 | 91 | ||
| 64 | 00 | 01 | 63 | ||
| Dwaraka Tirumala | Chelikanivari Potepalli | 83/3 | 00 | 37 | 89 |
| 82 | 00 | 46 | 60 | ||
| 81/2 | 00 | 11 | 92 | ||
| 81/1 | 00 | 02 | 91 | ||
| 80/5 | 00 | 14 | 69 | ||
| 80/3 | 00 | 09 | 56 | ||
| 80/2 | 00 | 04 | 41 | ||
| 80/1 | 00 | 15 | 00 | ||
| 97/3 | 00 | 15 | 90 | ||
| 97/2 | 00 | 10 | 41 | ||
| 97/1 | 00 | 05 | 63 | ||
| 98/4 | 00 | 00 | 32 | ||
| 100/9 | 00 | 01 | 47 | ||
| 100/8 | 00 | 09 | 98 | ||
| 100/7 | 00 | 07 | 06 | ||
| 100/11 | 00 | 10 | 08 | ||
| 99/7 | 00 | 10 | 60 | ||
| 99/6 | 00 | 09 | 62 | ||
| 99/5 | 00 | 03 | 85 | ||
| 100/6 | 00 | 17 | 63 | ||
| 100/3 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 100/1 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 100/2 | 00 | 08 | 60 | ||
| 101/1C | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 45/4 | 00 | 36 | 21 | ||
| 45/2 | 00 | 22 | 42 | ||
| 44/5 | 00 | 02 | 73 | ||
| 44/4 | 00 | 10 | 88 | ||
| 44/6 | 00 | 05 | 53 | ||
| 44/2 | 00 | 05 | 40 | ||
| 44/1 | 00 | 06 | 30 | ||
| 37/2F | 00 | 11 | 98 | ||
| 38/2 | 00 | 41 | 25 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 53535353....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1074(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के
राजपत्र संख्या 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : गोपालपुरम िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी ग(cid:144) थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए:
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्ष ेत्र फल |
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| गोपालपुरम | िभमोलु | 530/1 | 00 | 10 | 27 |
| 529/2 | 00 | 05 | 15 | ||
| 533/1 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 529/1 | 00 | 23 | 22 | ||
| 536/1 | 00 | 22 | 47 | ||
| 520/2 | 00 | 13 | 96 | ||
| 522 | 00 | 19 | 14 | ||
| 521 | 01 | 13 | 60 | ||
| गोपालपुरम | वेल्लाचिंतलागुडेम | 325 | 00 | 63 | 85 |
| 601 & 602 | 02 | 62 | 97 | ||
| 578 | 00 | 24 | 69 | ||
| 584 | 00 | 38 | 46 | ||
| 585/3 | 00 | 16 | 83 | ||
| 585/1 | 00 | 03 | 80 | ||
| 583/1 | 00 | 03 | 45 | ||
| 590/2C | 00 | 06 | 30 | ||
| 590/1C | 00 | 11 | 33 | ||
| 557 | 00 | 14 | 74 | ||
| 556/2 | 00 | 23 | 83 | ||
| 550/1 | 00 | 24 | 52 | ||
| 537 | 00 | 30 | 01 | ||
| 538 | 00 | 28 | 10 | ||
| 539 | 00 | 31 | 09 | ||
| गोपालपुरम | गोपालपुरम | 156/1 | 00 | 31 | 98 |
| 155 | 00 | 62 | 15 | ||
| 147 | 00 | 49 | 91 | ||
| 127/2 | 00 | 17 | 62 | ||
| 125 | 00 | 38 | 65 | ||
| 124 | 00 | 21 | 86 | ||
| 223/1A | 00 | 19 | 49 | ||
| 224 | 00 | 48 | 85 | ||
| 232 | 00 | 18 | 34 | ||
| 231 | 00 | 21 | 00 | ||
| 226/3 | 00 | 22 | 98 | ||
| 243 | 00 | 07 | 09 | ||
| 242/2C | 00 | 19 | 29 | ||
| 242/2B | 00 | 00 | 31 | ||
| 242/2A | 00 | 15 | 30 | ||
| 242/1A | 00 | 31 | 89 | ||
| 250/3C | 00 | 25 | 43 | ||
| 250/3A | 00 | 31 | 70 | ||
| 249 | 00 | 38 | 79 | ||
| 253/1A | 00 | 02 | 21 | ||
| 253/3A1 | 00 | 10 | 07 | ||
| 254/8 | 00 | 18 | 35 | ||
| 256/1A | 00 | 02 | 43 | ||
| 256/2A | 00 | 00 | 60 | ||
| गोपालपुरम | कोमटिकु ं टा | 58 | 00 | 31 | 20 |
| 67/2 | 00 | 33 | 01 | ||
| 67/3 | 00 | 09 | 72 | ||
| 48/3A | 00 | 13 | 97 | ||
| 48/3B | 00 | 01 | 02 | ||
| 48/2 | 00 | 05 | 62 | ||
| 48/1 | 00 | 10 | 25 | ||
| 1 | 00 | 49 | 83 | ||
| 45 | 00 | 36 | 16 | ||
| 36 | 00 | 56 | 84 | ||
| 35 | 00 | 21 | 72 | ||
| 24 | 00 | 19 | 49 | ||
| 32 | 00 | 45 | 51 | ||
| 109 | 00 | 04 | 77 | ||
| 111 | 00 | 58 | 44 | ||
| 112/2 | 00 | 35 | 84 | ||
| 121 | 00 | 18 | 13 | ||
| 113 | 00 | 05 | 44 | ||
| गोपालपुरम | वडलागुन्टा | 35 | 00 | 31 | 11 |
| 34 | 00 | 20 | 05 | ||
| 33 | 00 | 30 | 99 | ||
| 7 | 00 | 16 | 70 | ||
| 8 | 00 | 29 | 57 | ||
| 14 | 00 | 06 | 47 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 53.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1074 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Gopalapuram, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District : West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Gopalapuram | Bhimolu | 530/1 | 00 | 10 | 27 |
| 529/2 | 00 | 05 | 15 | ||
| 533/1 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 529/1 | 00 | 23 | 22 | ||
| 536/1 | 00 | 22 | 47 | ||
| 520/2 | 00 | 13 | 96 | ||
| 522 | 00 | 19 | 14 | ||
| 521 | 01 | 13 | 60 | ||
| Gopalapuram | Vellachintalagudem | 325 | 00 | 63 | 85 |
| 601 & 602 | 02 | 62 | 97 | ||
| 578 | 00 | 24 | 69 | ||
| 584 | 00 | 38 | 46 | ||
| 585/3 | 00 | 16 | 83 | ||
| 585/1 | 00 | 03 | 80 | ||
| 583/1 | 00 | 03 | 45 | ||
| 590/2C | 00 | 06 | 30 | ||
| 590/1C | 00 | 11 | 33 | ||
| 557 | 00 | 14 | 74 | ||
| 556/2 | 00 | 23 | 83 | ||
| 550/1 | 00 | 24 | 52 | ||
| 537 | 00 | 30 | 01 | ||
| 538 | 00 | 28 | 10 | ||
| 539 | 00 | 31 | 09 | ||
| Gopalapuram | Gopalapuram | 156/1 | 00 | 31 | 98 |
| 155 | 00 | 62 | 15 | ||
| 147 | 00 | 49 | 91 | ||
| 127/2 | 00 | 17 | 62 | ||
| 125 | 00 | 38 | 65 | ||
| 124 | 00 | 21 | 86 | ||
| 223/1A | 00 | 19 | 49 | ||
| 224 | 00 | 48 | 85 | ||
| 232 | 00 | 18 | 34 | ||
| 231 | 00 | 21 | 00 | ||
| 226/3 | 00 | 22 | 98 | ||
| 243 | 00 | 07 | 09 | ||
| 242/2C | 00 | 19 | 29 | ||
| 242/2B | 00 | 00 | 31 | ||
| 242/2A | 00 | 15 | 30 | ||
| 242/1A | 00 | 31 | 89 | ||
| 250/3C | 00 | 25 | 43 | ||
| 250/3A | 00 | 31 | 70 | ||
| 249 | 00 | 38 | 79 | ||
| 253/1A | 00 | 02 | 21 | ||
| 253/3A1 | 00 | 10 | 07 | ||
| 254/8 | 00 | 18 | 35 | ||
| 256/1A | 00 | 02 | 43 | ||
| 256/2A | 00 | 00 | 60 | ||
| Gopalapuram | Komatikunta | 58 | 00 | 31 | 20 |
| 67/2 | 00 | 33 | 01 | ||
| 67/3 | 00 | 09 | 72 | ||
| 48/3A | 00 | 13 | 97 | ||
| 48/3B | 00 | 01 | 02 | ||
| 48/2 | 00 | 05 | 62 | ||
| 48/1 | 00 | 10 | 25 | ||
| 1 | 00 | 49 | 83 | ||
| 45 | 00 | 36 | 16 | ||
| 36 | 00 | 56 | 84 | ||
| 35 | 00 | 21 | 72 | ||
| 24 | 00 | 19 | 49 | ||
| 32 | 00 | 45 | 51 | ||
| 109 | 00 | 04 | 77 | ||
| 111 | 00 | 58 | 44 | ||
| 112/2 | 00 | 35 | 84 | ||
| 121 | 00 | 18 | 13 | ||
| 113 | 00 | 05 | 44 | ||
| Gopalapuram | Vadlagunta | 35 | 00 | 31 | 11 |
| 34 | 00 | 20 | 05 | ||
| 33 | 00 | 30 | 99 | ||
| 7 | 00 | 16 | 70 | ||
| 8 | 00 | 29 | 57 | ||
| 14 | 00 | 06 | 47 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 54545454....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1073(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : ताल्लपुडी िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में130 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिष्चय किया है:
| जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्ष ेत्र फल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| ताल्लपुडी | बयावरम | 111/7 | 00 | 06 | 11 |
| 111/6 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 111/9 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 79/3 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 79/4 | 00 | 09 | 80 | ||
| 78/1 | 00 | 00 | 14 | ||
| 76/1 | 00 | 13 | 69 | ||
| 76/2 | 00 | 15 | 00 | ||
| 78/2 | 00 | 00 | 74 | ||
| 76/3 | 00 | 28 | 25 | ||
| ताल्लपुडी | रागोलापल्ली | 261/1A | 00 | 08 | 97 |
| 260/5 | 00 | 17 | 95 | ||
| 260/4 | 00 | 12 | 07 | ||
| 254/2 | 00 | 31 | 35 | ||
| 254/1 | 00 | 16 | 46 | ||
| 251/2 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 251/1 | 00 | 11 | 18 | ||
| 250/4 | 00 | 00 | 08 | ||
| 252/6 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 250/2 | 00 | 09 | 22 | ||
| 250/1 | 00 | 13 | 88 | ||
| 249/4 | 00 | 17 | 86 | ||
| ताल्लपुडी | त ुपाकु लागुडेम | 247 | 00 | 00 | 90 |
| 241 | 00 | 26 | 64 | ||
| 240 | 00 | 12 | 39 | ||
| 232/3 | 00 | 04 | 90 | ||
| 232/4 | 00 | 19 | 00 | ||
| 234 | 00 | 10 | 62 | ||
| 225/1 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 225/3 | 00 | 16 | 20 | ||
| 225/4 | 00 | 13 | 11 | ||
| 142/2 | 00 | 18 | 33 | ||
| 142/1 | 00 | 00 | 66 | ||
| 142/3 | 00 | 15 | 64 | ||
| 142/4 | 00 | 19 | 59 | ||
| 145 | 00 | 44 | 18 | ||
| 161/1 | 00 | 05 | 11 | ||
| 161/2 | 00 | 10 | 71 | ||
| 162/1 | 00 | 05 | 71 | ||
| 162/4 | 00 | 01 | 28 | ||
| 180 | 00 | 03 | 57 | ||
| ताल्लपुडी | अन्नादेवरपेटा | 216/1 | 00 | 17 | 84 |
| 217 | 00 | 29 | 77 | ||
| 214 | 00 | 27 | 12 | ||
| 213 | 00 | 00 | 03 | ||
| 221/1 | 00 | 19 | 63 | ||
| 221/4 | 00 | 00 | 03 | ||
| 221/3 | 00 | 09 | 06 | ||
| 221/2 | 00 | 08 | 70 | ||
| 228/3 | 00 | 12 | 87 | ||
| 229 | 00 | 19 | 09 | ||
| 281/1 | 00 | 12 | 56 | ||
| 281/2 | 00 | 12 | 71 | ||
| 279/1 | 00 | 00 | 0.19 | ||
| 289 | 00 | 17 | 65 | ||
| 290/2 | 00 | 17 | 42 | ||
| 258/1 | 00 | 10 | 60 | ||
| 273/2 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 273/1 | 00 | 08 | 17 | ||
| 272/3 | 00 | 07 | 20 | ||
| 272/2 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 260/1 | 00 | 04 | 04 | ||
| 263/4B | 00 | 02 | 97 | ||
| 263/3 | 00 | 08 | 48 | ||
| 263/2 | 00 | 07 | 52 | ||
| 263/1 | 00 | 08 | 14 | ||
| 270 | 00 | 16 | 34 | ||
| 358 | 00 | 27 | 65 | ||
| 347 | 00 | 00 | 24 | ||
| 349 | 00 | 37 | 66 | ||
| 348 | 00 | 02 | 02 | ||
| 351/2 | 00 | 30 | 09 | ||
| 352/3A | 00 | 10 | 73 | ||
| 352/1 | 00 | 08 | 84 | ||
| 352/2 | 00 | 05 | 56 | ||
| 341/3 | 00 | 09 | 55 |
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 54.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1073 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Tallapudi, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
District : West Godavari State : Andhra Pradesh
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Tallapudi | Bayyavaram | 111/7 | 00 | 06 | 11 |
| 111/6 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 111/9 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 79/3 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 79/4 | 00 | 09 | 80 | ||
| 78/1 | 00 | 00 | 14 | ||
| 76/1 | 00 | 13 | 69 | ||
| 76/2 | 00 | 15 | 00 | ||
| 78/2 | 00 | 00 | 74 | ||
| 76/3 | 00 | 28 | 25 | ||
| Tallapudi | Ragolapalli | 261/1A | 00 | 08 | 97 |
| 260/5 | 00 | 17 | 95 | ||
| 260/4 | 00 | 12 | 07 | ||
| 254/2 | 00 | 31 | 35 | ||
| 254/1 | 00 | 16 | 46 | ||
| 251/2 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 251/1 | 00 | 11 | 18 | ||
| 250/4 | 00 | 00 | 08 | ||
| 252/6 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 250/2 | 00 | 09 | 22 | ||
| 250/1 | 00 | 13 | 88 | ||
| 249/4 | 00 | 17 | 86 | ||
| Tallapudi | Tupakulagudem | 247 | 00 | 00 | 90 |
| 241 | 00 | 26 | 64 | ||
| 240 | 00 | 12 | 39 | ||
| 232/3 | 00 | 04 | 90 | ||
| 232/4 | 00 | 19 | 00 | ||
| 234 | 00 | 10 | 62 | ||
| 225/1 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 225/3 | 00 | 16 | 20 | ||
| 225/4 | 00 | 13 | 11 | ||
| 142/2 | 00 | 18 | 33 | ||
| 142/1 | 00 | 00 | 66 | ||
| 142/3 | 00 | 15 | 64 | ||
| 142/4 | 00 | 19 | 59 | ||
| 145 | 00 | 44 | 18 | ||
| 161/1 | 00 | 05 | 11 | ||
| 161/2 | 00 | 10 | 71 | ||
| 162/1 | 00 | 05 | 71 | ||
| 162/4 | 00 | 01 | 28 | ||
| 180 | 00 | 03 | 57 | ||
| Tallapudi | Annadevarapeta | 216/1 | 00 | 17 | 84 |
| 217 | 00 | 29 | 77 | ||
| 214 | 00 | 27 | 12 | ||
| 213 | 00 | 00 | 03 | ||
| 221/1 | 00 | 19 | 63 | ||
| 221/4 | 00 | 00 | 03 | ||
| 221/3 | 00 | 09 | 06 | ||
| 221/2 | 00 | 08 | 70 | ||
| 228/3 | 00 | 12 | 87 | ||
| 229 | 00 | 19 | 09 | ||
| 281/1 | 00 | 12 | 56 | ||
| 281/2 | 00 | 12 | 71 | ||
| 279/1 | 00 | 00 | 0.19 | ||
| 289 | 00 | 17 | 65 | ||
| 290/2 | 00 | 17 | 42 | ||
| 258/1 | 00 | 10 | 60 | ||
| 273/2 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 273/1 | 00 | 08 | 17 | ||
| 272/3 | 00 | 07 | 20 | ||
| 272/2 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 260/1 | 00 | 04 | 04 | ||
| 263/4B | 00 | 02 | 97 | ||
| 263/3 | 00 | 08 | 48 | ||
| 263/2 | 00 | 07 | 52 | ||
| 263/1 | 00 | 08 | 14 | ||
| 270 | 00 | 16 | 34 | ||
| 358 | 00 | 27 | 65 | ||
| 347 | 00 | 00 | 24 | ||
| 349 | 00 | 37 | 66 | ||
| 348 | 00 | 02 | 02 | ||
| 351/2 | 00 | 30 | 09 | ||
| 352/3A | 00 | 10 | 73 | ||
| 352/1 | 00 | 08 | 84 | ||
| 352/2 | 00 | 05 | 56 | ||
| 341/3 | 00 | 09 | 55 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 55555555....———— के न्6ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्6ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इस से उपाबT अनुसूची में वNर्णत है और िजस में उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाएं जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्6ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई (cid:142)क्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वNर्णत भूमि में हितबT है, उस तारीख से िजसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इक्कीस दिन के भीतर भूिम के नीचे पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने के लिए उसमें136 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] उपयोग के अिधकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में 8ी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड, पारादीप - हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर ,शहीद नगर,भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तहसील-जटणी | िजला - खोर्Tा | राज्य–ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| पाGिडआबील | 428 | 00 | 21 | 56 |
| 434 | 00 | 01 | 09 | |
| 382 | 00 | 09 | 28 | |
| 381 | 00 | 04 | 99 | |
| 361 | 00 | 05 | 83 | |
| 360 | 00 | 11 | 02 | |
| 357 | 00 | 01 | 72 | |
| 359 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |
| 358 | 00 | 00 | 73 | |
| 354 | 00 | 00 | 15 | |
| 440 | 00 | 01 | 86 | |
| 441 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |
| 442 | 00 | 11 | 92 | |
| 427 | 00 | 01 | 53 | |
| 426 | 00 | 01 | 46 | |
| 348 | 00 | 02 | 43 | |
| 344 | 00 | 00 | 72 | |
| 345 | 00 | 00 | 10 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/236/2017-ओआर-I/ई-13717]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 55.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana), "Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
137 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
SCHEDULE
| Tehsil : JATANI | District : KHORDHA | State : ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| PANDIABIL | 428 | 00 | 21 | 56 |
| 434 | 00 | 01 | 09 | |
| 382 | 00 | 09 | 28 | |
| 381 | 00 | 04 | 99 | |
| 361 | 00 | 05 | 83 | |
| 360 | 00 | 11 | 02 | |
| 357 | 00 | 01 | 72 | |
| 359 | 00 | 00 | 69 | |
| 358 | 00 | 00 | 73 | |
| 354 | 00 | 00 | 15 | |
| 440 | 00 | 01 | 86 | |
| 441 | 00 | 00 | 55 | |
| 442 | 00 | 11 | 92 | |
| 427 | 00 | 01 | 53 | |
| 426 | 00 | 01 | 46 | |
| 348 | 00 | 02 | 43 | |
| 344 | 00 | 00 | 72 | |
| 345 | 00 | 00 | 10 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 56565656....———— के न्6ीय सरकार को ऐसा प्रतीत होता है कि लोक िहत में यह आवश्यक है कि हल्दीया - बरौनी पाइपलाइन
पारियोजना के अन्तर्गत पेट्रोलियम पदाथu के परिवहन हेतु प(िcid:135)म बंगाल राज्य के हल्दीया रिफ़ाइनरी से बिहार राज्य के बरौनी
रिफ़ाइनरी तक इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाई जानी चाहिए;;;;
138 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]और के न्6ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि उस भूिम में जिसके भीतर उक्त पाइपलाइन िबछाई जाने का प्रस्ताव है और जो इस अिधसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूची मे वNर्णत है,,,, उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्6ीय सरकार,,,, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइंस (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 कि उप धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए,,,, उस भूिम में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है ;;;;
कोई (cid:142)क्ति,,,, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वNर्णत भूमि में हितबT है,,,, उस तारीख से िजसको,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में यथा प्रकाशित इस अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती हैं,,,, इक्कीस दिन के अन्दर,,,, भूिम के भीतर पाइपलाइन िबछाए जाने हेतु उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के िलए,,,, 8ी भुवनेश्वर मि8ा,,,, से॰ िन॰ अपर सिचव िबहार सरकार व सक्षम प्राधिकारी,,,, इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलिमटेड (पाइपलाइंस िडिवजन)))),,,, बी॰ के ॰ पी॰ एल॰ मुख्यालय परिसर,,,, पो॰ बरौनी आयल रिफ़ाइनरी,,,, िजला बेगूसराय,,,, िपन– 851114 (िबहार) को लिखित रूप मे आक्षेप भेज सके गा ।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| िजला : पटना राज्य : बिहार | |||||
| अ ंचल | मौज़ा का नाम | सव / प्लाट नम्बर | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| मोकामा | जलाल पुर नौरंगा - 13 | 631 | 00 | 01 | 06 |
| 630 | 00 | 12 | 71 | ||
| 2677 | 00 | 09 | 93 | ||
| 629 | 00 | 07 | 37 | ||
| 628 | 00 | 06 | 54 | ||
| 627 | 00 | 05 | 57 | ||
| 626 | 00 | 06 | 52 | ||
| 625 | 00 | 09 | 15 | ||
| 624 | 00 | 02 | 76 | ||
| 442 | 00 | 01 | 85 | ||
| 443 | 00 | 02 | 84 | ||
| 162 | 00 | 14 | 95 | ||
| 161 | 00 | 03 | 75 | ||
| 160 | 00 | 04 | 84 | ||
| 134 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 141 | 00 | 03 | 60 | ||
| 139 | 00 | 04 | 12 | ||
| 140 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 138 | 00 | 01 | 81 | ||
| 130 | 00 | 03 | 36 | ||
| 143 | 00 | 13 | 77 | ||
| 144 | 00 | 10 | 13 | ||
| 145 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 126 | 00 | 06 | 61 | ||
| मोकामा | राम पुर डुमरा - 15 | 1423 | 00 | 00 | 62 |
| 1422 | 00 | 17 | 59 | ||
| 1421 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 1377 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 1378 | 00 | 01 | 75 | ||
| 1356 | 00 | 13 | 02 | ||
| 1311 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 1312 | 00 | 08 | 00 | ||
| 1313 | 00 | 07 | 46 | ||
| 1314 | 00 | 00 | 52 | ||
| 1286 | 00 | 10 | 43 | ||
| 1277 | 00 | 09 | 48 | ||
| 1278 | 00 | 09 | 05 | ||
| 3928 | 00 | 15 | 02 | ||
| 1145 | 00 | 20 | 88 | ||
| 1150 | 00 | 03 | 20 | ||
| 1148 | 00 | 10 | 08 | ||
| 1147 | 00 | 14 | 98 | ||
| 3707 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| मोकामा | मरांची - 19 | 1277 | 00 | 14 | 55 |
| 1400 | 00 | 05 | 68 | ||
| 1271 | 00 | 30 | 68 | ||
| 1266 | 00 | 11 | 99 | ||
| 1425 | 00 | 03 | 79 | ||
| 1426 | 00 | 00 | 33 | ||
| 1427 | 00 | 08 | 02 | ||
| 1428 | 00 | 04 | 08 | ||
| 1429 | 00 | 03 | 04 | ||
| 1430 | 00 | 03 | 71 | ||
| 1263 | 00 | 05 | 47 | ||
| 1435 | 00 | 05 | 28 | ||
| 1455 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 1456 | 00 | 06 | 63 | ||
| 1457 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 8555 | 00 | 05 | 26 | ||
| 1459 | 00 | 03 | 11 | ||
| 1487 | 00 | 16 | 68 | ||
| 1488 | 00 | 14 | 28 | ||
| 8520 | 00 | 05 | 38 | ||
| 1561 | 00 | 04 | 17 | ||
| 1563 | 00 | 01 | 99 | ||
| 1564 | 00 | 02 | 82 | ||
| 1565 | 00 | 02 | 81 | ||
| 1570 | 00 | 06 | 21 | ||
| 1571 | 00 | 09 | 58 | ||
| 1572 | 00 | 03 | 58 | ||
| 1573 | 00 | 06 | 02 | ||
| 1654 | 00 | 03 | 08 | ||
| 1653 | 00 | 01 | 54 | ||
| 1657 | 00 | 02 | 52 | ||
| 8523 | 00 | 02 | 20 | ||
| 1658 | 00 | 04 | 67 | ||
| 1659 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 1660 | 00 | 00 | 33 | ||
| 1664 | 00 | 06 | 26 | ||
| 1663 | 00 | 01 | 19 | ||
| 1679 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 1680 | 00 | 03 | 63 | ||
| 8583 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 1681 | 00 | 00 | 40 | ||
| 8582 | 00 | 11 | 70 | ||
| 8581 | 00 | 04 | 50 | ||
| 8160 | 00 | 05 | 43 | ||
| 8170 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 8169 | 00 | 01 | 87 | ||
| 8167 | 00 | 01 | 99 | ||
| 8166 | 00 | 02 | 66 | ||
| 8165 | 00 | 02 | 62 | ||
| 8164 | 00 | 01 | 84 | ||
| 8163 | 00 | 02 | 57 | ||
| 8162 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 8161 | 00 | 03 | 14 | ||
| 521 | 00 | 03 | 07 | ||
| 519 | 00 | 03 | 31 | ||
| 520 | 00 | 07 | 10 | ||
| 517 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 8181 | 00 | 03 | 63 | ||
| 8207 | 00 | 07 | 88 | ||
| 8206 | 00 | 01 | 54 | ||
| 356 | 00 | 03 | 18 | ||
| 355 | 00 | 00 | 25 | ||
| 354 | 00 | 26 | 08 | ||
| 353 | 00 | 04 | 69 | ||
| 305 | 00 | 00 | 99 | ||
| 306 | 00 | 02 | 32 | ||
| 8228 | 00 | 03 | 08 | ||
| 303 | 00 | 05 | 28 | ||
| 304 | 00 | 01 | 36 | ||
| 301 | 00 | 06 | 32 | ||
| 283 | 00 | 05 | 49 | ||
| 280 | 00 | 12 | 35 | ||
| 8241 | 00 | 03 | 89 | ||
| 255 | 00 | 06 | 00 | ||
| 253 | 00 | 05 | 12 | ||
| 247 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 241 | 00 | 03 | 80 | ||
| 8274 | 00 | 02 | 98 | ||
| 8273 | 00 | 04 | 50 | ||
| 240 | 00 | 04 | 35 | ||
| 8279 | 00 | 03 | 19 | ||
| 8278 | 00 | 03 | 00 | ||
| 191 | 00 | 07 | 86 | ||
| 190 | 00 | 07 | 07 | ||
| 189 | 00 | 07 | 73 | ||
| 8136 | 00 | 04 | 54 | ||
| 185 | 00 | 03 | 52 | ||
| 168 | 00 | 02 | 14 | ||
| 169 | 00 | 06 | 10 | ||
| 164 | 00 | 05 | 45 | ||
| 136 | 00 | 11 | 64 | ||
| 135 | 00 | 03 | 10 | ||
| 137 | 00 | 03 | 73 | ||
| 117 | 00 | 03 | 07 | ||
| 116 | 00 | 03 | 46 | ||
| 97 | 00 | 31 | 36 | ||
| 82 | 00 | 07 | 83 | ||
| 70 | 00 | 10 | 73 | ||
| 71 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 65 | 00 | 07 | 60 | ||
| 62 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 61 | 00 | 07 | 90 | ||
| 49 | 00 | 08 | 49 | ||
| 8087 | 00 | 01 | 70 | ||
| 8080 | 00 | 01 | 80 | ||
| 8068 | 00 | 04 | 24 | ||
| 8057 | 00 | 00 | 53 | ||
| 8058 | 00 | 06 | 34 | ||
| 41 | 00 | 13 | 15 | ||
| 39 | 00 | 06 | 49 | ||
| 38 | 00 | 32 | 45 | ||
| 37 | 00 | 00 | 81 | ||
| मोकामा | हिथदह खुरद - 21 | 564 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 563 | 00 | 00 | 64 | ||
| 562 | 00 | 03 | 62 | ||
| 561 | 00 | 03 | 19 | ||
| 560 | 00 | 01 | 65 | ||
| 559 | 00 | 01 | 23 | ||
| 558 | 00 | 00 | 77 | ||
| 557 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 555 | 00 | 02 | 86 | ||
| 556 | 00 | 06 | 25 | ||
| 514 | 00 | 06 | 15 | ||
| 513 | 00 | 06 | 18 | ||
| 512 | 00 | 11 | 71 | ||
| 302 | 00 | 07 | 25 | ||
| 507 | 00 | 12 | 55 | ||
| 475 | 00 | 08 | 41 | ||
| 476 | 00 | 09 | 73 | ||
| 477 | 00 | 14 | 09 | ||
| 474 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 500 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 478 | 00 | 00 | 24 | ||
| 473 | 00 | 06 | 22 | ||
| 464 | 00 | 04 | 34 | ||
| 465 | 00 | 05 | 69 | ||
| 408 | 00 | 02 | 82 | ||
| 405 | 00 | 06 | 86 | ||
| 404 | 00 | 04 | 39 | ||
| 400 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 402 | 00 | 17 | 57 | ||
| 390 | 00 | 03 | 79 | ||
| 389 | 00 | 01 | 28 | ||
| 388 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 508 | 00 | 10 | 61 | ||
| 509 | 00 | 10 | 28 | ||
| 520 | 00 | 11 | 36 | ||
| 542 | 00 | 01 | 21 | ||
| 521 | 00 | 00 | 27 | ||
| 541 | 00 | 04 | 94 | ||
| 540 | 00 | 10 | 85 | ||
| 588 | 00 | 06 | 84 | ||
| 589 | 00 | 01 | 64 | ||
| 587 | 00 | 01 | 04 | ||
| 590 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 591 | 00 | 04 | 05 | ||
| 586 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 592 | 00 | 09 | 05 | ||
| 593 | 00 | 01 | 39 | ||
| 533 | 00 | 24 | 39 | ||
| 607 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 608 | 00 | 04 | 06 | ||
| 609 | 00 | 01 | 25 | ||
| 611 | 00 | 05 | 26 | ||
| 612 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 613 | 00 | 01 | 10 | ||
| 614 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 616 | 00 | 07 | 37 | ||
| 617 | 00 | 15 | 33 | ||
| 647 | 00 | 04 | 85 | ||
| 648 | 00 | 05 | 30 | ||
| 650 | 00 | 02 | 52 | ||
| 653 | 00 | 01 | 46 | ||
| 657 | 00 | 01 | 40 | ||
| 658 | 00 | 02 | 50 | ||
| 659 | 00 | 11 | 00 | ||
| 660 | 00 | 03 | 01 | ||
| 661 | 00 | 03 | 22 | ||
| मोकामा | हथिदहबुजुग - 20 | 2421 | 00 | 22 | 30 |
| 2419 | 00 | 03 | 01 | ||
| 2416 | 00 | 03 | 90 | ||
| 2448 | 00 | 02 | 73 | ||
| 2408 | 00 | 00 | 96 | ||
| 2409 | 00 | 10 | 92 | ||
| 1099 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 2403 | 00 | 00 | 56 | ||
| 2402 | 00 | 09 | 27 | ||
| 2399 | 00 | 03 | 33 | ||
| 2386 | 00 | 03 | 44 | ||
| 2384 | 00 | 01 | 14 | ||
| 2380 | 00 | 01 | 52 | ||
| 2373 | 00 | 01 | 74 | ||
| 2368 | 00 | 01 | 15 | ||
| 2369 | 00 | 00 | 29 | ||
| 2363 | 00 | 01 | 84 | ||
| 2362 | 00 | 01 | 29 | ||
| 2360 | 00 | 00 | 98 | ||
| 2359 | 00 | 01 | 47 | ||
| 2354 | 00 | 01 | 41 | ||
| 2353 | 00 | 02 | 17 | ||
| 2352 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 2209 | 00 | 02 | 28 | ||
| 2211 | 00 | 02 | 94 | ||
| 2213 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 2214 | 00 | 01 | 94 | ||
| 2215 | 00 | 04 | 13 | ||
| 2218 | 00 | 01 | 78 | ||
| 2219 | 00 | 01 | 62 | ||
| 2222 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2224 | 00 | 02 | 90 | ||
| 2225 | 00 | 03 | 44 | ||
| 2228 | 00 | 02 | 99 | ||
| 2230 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2229 | 00 | 03 | 70 | ||
| 2155 | 00 | 02 | 02 | ||
| 2156 | 00 | 00 | 86 | ||
| 2180 | 00 | 00 | 57 | ||
| 2257 | 00 | 02 | 50 | ||
| 2153 | 00 | 00 | 49 | ||
| 2158 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 2152 | 00 | 00 | 47 | ||
| 2159 | 00 | 03 | 87 | ||
| 2145 | 00 | 03 | 96 | ||
| 2140 | 00 | 02 | 15 | ||
| 2139 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 2134 | 00 | 01 | 68 | ||
| 2138 | 00 | 00 | 26 | ||
| 2135 | 00 | 00 | 87 | ||
| 2122 | 00 | 08 | 02 | ||
| 2121 | 00 | 08 | 72 | ||
| 2136 | 00 | 00 | 75 | ||
| 2115 | 00 | 05 | 09 | ||
| 2114 | 00 | 03 | 41 | ||
| 2059 | 00 | 07 | 31 | ||
| 1149 | 00 | 03 | 76 | ||
| 2029 | 00 | 02 | 85 | ||
| 2030 | 00 | 01 | 60 | ||
| 2031 | 00 | 02 | 68 | ||
| 2028 | 00 | 00 | 41 | ||
| 2032 | 00 | 02 | 03 | ||
| 2017 | 00 | 03 | 34 | ||
| 2013 | 00 | 02 | 18 | ||
| 2008 | 00 | 03 | 16 | ||
| 2007 | 00 | 00 | 39 | ||
| 2006 | 00 | 00 | 26 | ||
| 2002 | 00 | 10 | 59 | ||
| 2009 | 00 | 00 | 44 | ||
| 2010 | 00 | 01 | 19 | ||
| 1653 | 00 | 04 | 73 | ||
| 1595 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 1651 | 00 | 03 | 94 | ||
| 1652 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 1654 | 00 | 00 | 29 | ||
| 1614 | 00 | 05 | 82 | ||
| 1650 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 1647 | 00 | 00 | 94 | ||
| 1617 | 00 | 00 | 66 | ||
| 1618 | 00 | 01 | 01 | ||
| 1616 | 00 | 05 | 91 | ||
| 1615 | 00 | 04 | 17 | ||
| 1631 | 00 | 07 | 29 | ||
| 1630 | 00 | 02 | 45 | ||
| 1632 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2833 | 00 | 04 | 85 | ||
| 2834 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 252 | 00 | 06 | 29 | ||
| 251 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 250 | 00 | 02 | 17 | ||
| 231 | 00 | 01 | 06 | ||
| 220 | 00 | 00 | 50 | ||
| 221 | 00 | 24 | 97 | ||
| 2847 | 00 | 07 | 80 | ||
| मोकामा | कसया दियारामराचk - 10 | 639 | 00 | 03 | 07 |
| 640 | 00 | 01 | 49 | ||
| 641 | 00 | 01 | 81 | ||
| 644 | 00 | 04 | 96 | ||
| 645 | 00 | 02 | 24 | ||
| 646 | 00 | 01 | 16 | ||
| 647 | 00 | 00 | 94 | ||
| 648 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 649 | 00 | 01 | 74 | ||
| 652 | 00 | 02 | 20 | ||
| 656 | 00 | 03 | 34 | ||
| 655 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 662 | 00 | 01 | 71 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/251/2017-ओआर-I/ई-20885]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 56.— Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of Petroleum Products from Haldia Refinery in the state of West Bengal to Barauni Refinery in the State of Bihar a pipeline should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the Schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Shri. Bhubneshwar Mishra, Additional Secretary (Retd.), Govt. of Bihar & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipeline Division, BKPL Head Quarter, Post- Barauni Oil Refinery, District – Begusarai, Bihar – 851114.
SCHEDULE
| District : Patna State : Bihar | |||||
| Anchal | Name of Mouza | Survey / Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Mokama | Jalalpur Nauranga - 13 | 631 | 00 | 01 | 06 |
| 630 | 00 | 12 | 71 | ||
| 2677 | 00 | 09 | 93 | ||
| 629 | 00 | 07 | 37 | ||
| 628 | 00 | 06 | 54 | ||
| 627 | 00 | 05 | 57 | ||
| 626 | 00 | 06 | 52 | ||
| 625 | 00 | 09 | 15 | ||
| 624 | 00 | 02 | 76 | ||
| 442 | 00 | 01 | 85 | ||
| 443 | 00 | 02 | 84 | ||
| 162 | 00 | 14 | 95 | ||
| 161 | 00 | 03 | 75 | ||
| 160 | 00 | 04 | 84 | ||
| 134 | 00 | 09 | 01 | ||
| 141 | 00 | 03 | 60 | ||
| 139 | 00 | 04 | 12 | ||
| 140 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 138 | 00 | 01 | 81 | ||
| 130 | 00 | 03 | 36 | ||
| 143 | 00 | 13 | 77 | ||
| 144 | 00 | 10 | 13 | ||
| 145 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 126 | 00 | 06 | 61 | ||
| Mokama | Rampur Dumra - 15 | 1423 | 00 | 00 | 62 |
| 1422 | 00 | 17 | 59 | ||
| 1421 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 1377 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 1378 | 00 | 01 | 75 | ||
| 1356 | 00 | 13 | 02 | ||
| 1311 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 1312 | 00 | 08 | 00 | ||
| 1313 | 00 | 07 | 46 | ||
| 1314 | 00 | 00 | 52 | ||
| 1286 | 00 | 10 | 43 | ||
| 1277 | 00 | 09 | 48 | ||
| 1278 | 00 | 09 | 05 | ||
| 3928 | 00 | 15 | 02 | ||
| 1145 | 00 | 20 | 88 | ||
| 1150 | 00 | 03 | 20 | ||
| 1148 | 00 | 10 | 08 | ||
| 1147 | 00 | 14 | 98 | ||
| 3707 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| Mokama | Maranchi -19 | 1277 | 00 | 14 | 55 |
| 1400 | 00 | 05 | 68 | ||
| 1271 | 00 | 30 | 68 | ||
| 1266 | 00 | 11 | 99 | ||
| 1425 | 00 | 03 | 79 | ||
| 1426 | 00 | 00 | 33 | ||
| 1427 | 00 | 08 | 02 | ||
| 1428 | 00 | 04 | 08 | ||
| 1429 | 00 | 03 | 04 | ||
| 1430 | 00 | 03 | 71 | ||
| 1263 | 00 | 05 | 47 | ||
| 1435 | 00 | 05 | 28 | ||
| 1455 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 1456 | 00 | 06 | 63 | ||
| 1457 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 8555 | 00 | 05 | 26 | ||
| 1459 | 00 | 03 | 11 | ||
| 1487 | 00 | 16 | 68 | ||
| 1488 | 00 | 14 | 28 | ||
| 8520 | 00 | 05 | 38 | ||
| 1561 | 00 | 04 | 17 | ||
| 1563 | 00 | 01 | 99 | ||
| 1564 | 00 | 02 | 82 | ||
| 1565 | 00 | 02 | 81 | ||
| 1570 | 00 | 06 | 21 | ||
| 1571 | 00 | 09 | 58 | ||
| 1572 | 00 | 03 | 58 | ||
| 1573 | 00 | 06 | 02 | ||
| 1654 | 00 | 03 | 08 | ||
| 1653 | 00 | 01 | 54 | ||
| 1657 | 00 | 02 | 52 | ||
| 8523 | 00 | 02 | 20 | ||
| 1658 | 00 | 04 | 67 | ||
| 1659 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 1660 | 00 | 00 | 33 | ||
| 1664 | 00 | 06 | 26 | ||
| 1663 | 00 | 01 | 19 | ||
| 1679 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 1680 | 00 | 03 | 63 | ||
| 8583 | 00 | 02 | 38 | ||
| 1681 | 00 | 00 | 40 | ||
| 8582 | 00 | 11 | 70 | ||
| 8581 | 00 | 04 | 50 | ||
| 8160 | 00 | 05 | 43 | ||
| 8170 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 8169 | 00 | 01 | 87 | ||
| 8167 | 00 | 01 | 99 | ||
| 8166 | 00 | 02 | 66 | ||
| 8165 | 00 | 02 | 62 | ||
| 8164 | 00 | 01 | 84 | ||
| 8163 | 00 | 02 | 57 | ||
| 8162 | 00 | 02 | 75 | ||
| 8161 | 00 | 03 | 14 | ||
| 521 | 00 | 03 | 07 | ||
| 519 | 00 | 03 | 31 | ||
| 520 | 00 | 07 | 10 | ||
| 517 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 8181 | 00 | 03 | 63 | ||
| 8207 | 00 | 07 | 88 | ||
| 8206 | 00 | 01 | 54 | ||
| 356 | 00 | 03 | 18 | ||
| 355 | 00 | 00 | 25 | ||
| 354 | 00 | 26 | 08 | ||
| 353 | 00 | 04 | 69 | ||
| 305 | 00 | 00 | 99 | ||
| 306 | 00 | 02 | 32 | ||
| 8228 | 00 | 03 | 08 | ||
| 303 | 00 | 05 | 28 | ||
| 304 | 00 | 01 | 36 | ||
| 301 | 00 | 06 | 32 | ||
| 283 | 00 | 05 | 49 | ||
| 280 | 00 | 12 | 35 | ||
| 8241 | 00 | 03 | 89 | ||
| 255 | 00 | 06 | 00 | ||
| 253 | 00 | 05 | 12 | ||
| 247 | 00 | 10 | 29 | ||
| 241 | 00 | 03 | 80 | ||
| 8274 | 00 | 02 | 98 | ||
| 8273 | 00 | 04 | 50 | ||
| 240 | 00 | 04 | 35 | ||
| 8279 | 00 | 03 | 19 | ||
| 8278 | 00 | 03 | 00 | ||
| 191 | 00 | 07 | 86 | ||
| 190 | 00 | 07 | 07 | ||
| 189 | 00 | 07 | 73 | ||
| 8136 | 00 | 04 | 54 | ||
| 185 | 00 | 03 | 52 | ||
| 168 | 00 | 02 | 14 | ||
| 169 | 00 | 06 | 10 | ||
| 164 | 00 | 05 | 45 | ||
| 136 | 00 | 11 | 64 | ||
| 135 | 00 | 03 | 10 | ||
| 137 | 00 | 03 | 73 | ||
| 117 | 00 | 03 | 07 | ||
| 116 | 00 | 03 | 46 | ||
| 97 | 00 | 31 | 36 | ||
| 82 | 00 | 07 | 83 | ||
| 70 | 00 | 10 | 73 | ||
| 71 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 65 | 00 | 07 | 60 | ||
| 62 | 00 | 05 | 81 | ||
| 61 | 00 | 07 | 90 | ||
| 49 | 00 | 08 | 49 | ||
| 8087 | 00 | 01 | 70 | ||
| 8080 | 00 | 01 | 80 | ||
| 8068 | 00 | 04 | 24 | ||
| 8057 | 00 | 00 | 53 | ||
| 8058 | 00 | 06 | 34 | ||
| 41 | 00 | 13 | 15 | ||
| 39 | 00 | 06 | 49 | ||
| 38 | 00 | 32 | 45 | ||
| 37 | 00 | 00 | 81 | ||
| Mokama | Hathidhah Khurd - 21 | 564 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
| 563 | 00 | 00 | 64 | ||
| 562 | 00 | 03 | 62 | ||
| 561 | 00 | 03 | 19 | ||
| 560 | 00 | 01 | 65 | ||
| 559 | 00 | 01 | 23 | ||
| 558 | 00 | 00 | 77 | ||
| 557 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 555 | 00 | 02 | 86 | ||
| 556 | 00 | 06 | 25 | ||
| 514 | 00 | 06 | 15 | ||
| 513 | 00 | 06 | 18 | ||
| 512 | 00 | 11 | 71 | ||
| 302 | 00 | 07 | 25 | ||
| 507 | 00 | 12 | 55 | ||
| 475 | 00 | 08 | 41 | ||
| 476 | 00 | 09 | 73 | ||
| 477 | 00 | 14 | 09 | ||
| 474 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 500 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 478 | 00 | 00 | 24 | ||
| 473 | 00 | 06 | 22 | ||
| 464 | 00 | 04 | 34 | ||
| 465 | 00 | 05 | 69 | ||
| 408 | 00 | 02 | 82 | ||
| 405 | 00 | 06 | 86 | ||
| 404 | 00 | 04 | 39 | ||
| 400 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 402 | 00 | 17 | 57 | ||
| 390 | 00 | 03 | 79 | ||
| 389 | 00 | 01 | 28 | ||
| 388 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 508 | 00 | 10 | 61 | ||
| 509 | 00 | 10 | 28 | ||
| 520 | 00 | 11 | 36 | ||
| 542 | 00 | 01 | 21 | ||
| 521 | 00 | 00 | 27 | ||
| 541 | 00 | 04 | 94 | ||
| 540 | 00 | 10 | 85 | ||
| 588 | 00 | 06 | 84 | ||
| 589 | 00 | 01 | 64 | ||
| 587 | 00 | 01 | 04 | ||
| 590 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 591 | 00 | 04 | 05 | ||
| 586 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 592 | 00 | 09 | 05 | ||
| 593 | 00 | 01 | 39 | ||
| 533 | 00 | 24 | 39 | ||
| 607 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 608 | 00 | 04 | 06 | ||
| 609 | 00 | 01 | 25 | ||
| 611 | 00 | 05 | 26 | ||
| 612 | 00 | 01 | 42 | ||
| 613 | 00 | 01 | 10 | ||
| 614 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 616 | 00 | 07 | 37 | ||
| 617 | 00 | 15 | 33 | ||
| 647 | 00 | 04 | 85 | ||
| 648 | 00 | 05 | 30 | ||
| 650 | 00 | 02 | 52 | ||
| 653 | 00 | 01 | 46 | ||
| 657 | 00 | 01 | 40 | ||
| 658 | 00 | 02 | 50 | ||
| 659 | 00 | 11 | 00 | ||
| 660 | 00 | 03 | 01 | ||
| 661 | 00 | 03 | 22 | ||
| Mokama | Hathidah Buzurg - 20 | 2421 | 00 | 22 | 30 |
| 2419 | 00 | 03 | 01 | ||
| 2416 | 00 | 03 | 90 | ||
| 2448 | 00 | 02 | 73 | ||
| 2408 | 00 | 00 | 96 | ||
| 2409 | 00 | 10 | 92 | ||
| 1099 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 2403 | 00 | 00 | 56 | ||
| 2402 | 00 | 09 | 27 | ||
| 2399 | 00 | 03 | 33 | ||
| 2386 | 00 | 03 | 44 | ||
| 2384 | 00 | 01 | 14 | ||
| 2380 | 00 | 01 | 52 | ||
| 2373 | 00 | 01 | 74 | ||
| 2368 | 00 | 01 | 15 | ||
| 2369 | 00 | 00 | 29 | ||
| 2363 | 00 | 01 | 84 | ||
| 2362 | 00 | 01 | 29 | ||
| 2360 | 00 | 00 | 98 | ||
| 2359 | 00 | 01 | 47 | ||
| 2354 | 00 | 01 | 41 | ||
| 2353 | 00 | 02 | 17 | ||
| 2352 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 2209 | 00 | 02 | 28 | ||
| 2211 | 00 | 02 | 94 | ||
| 2213 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 2214 | 00 | 01 | 94 | ||
| 2215 | 00 | 04 | 13 | ||
| 2218 | 00 | 01 | 78 | ||
| 2219 | 00 | 01 | 62 | ||
| 2222 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2224 | 00 | 02 | 90 | ||
| 2225 | 00 | 03 | 44 | ||
| 2228 | 00 | 02 | 99 | ||
| 2230 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2229 | 00 | 03 | 70 | ||
| 2155 | 00 | 02 | 02 | ||
| 2156 | 00 | 00 | 86 | ||
| 2180 | 00 | 00 | 57 | ||
| 2257 | 00 | 02 | 50 | ||
| 2153 | 00 | 00 | 49 | ||
| 2158 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 2152 | 00 | 00 | 47 | ||
| 2159 | 00 | 03 | 87 | ||
| 2145 | 00 | 03 | 96 | ||
| 2140 | 00 | 02 | 15 | ||
| 2139 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 2134 | 00 | 01 | 68 | ||
| 2138 | 00 | 00 | 26 | ||
| 2135 | 00 | 00 | 87 | ||
| 2122 | 00 | 08 | 02 | ||
| 2121 | 00 | 08 | 72 | ||
| 2136 | 00 | 00 | 75 | ||
| 2115 | 00 | 05 | 09 | ||
| 2114 | 00 | 03 | 41 | ||
| 2059 | 00 | 07 | 31 | ||
| 1149 | 00 | 03 | 76 | ||
| 2029 | 00 | 02 | 85 | ||
| 2030 | 00 | 01 | 60 | ||
| 2031 | 00 | 02 | 68 | ||
| 2028 | 00 | 00 | 41 | ||
| 2032 | 00 | 02 | 03 | ||
| 2017 | 00 | 03 | 34 | ||
| 2013 | 00 | 02 | 18 | ||
| 2008 | 00 | 03 | 16 | ||
| 2007 | 00 | 00 | 39 | ||
| 2006 | 00 | 00 | 26 | ||
| 2002 | 00 | 10 | 59 | ||
| 2009 | 00 | 00 | 44 | ||
| 2010 | 00 | 01 | 19 | ||
| 1653 | 00 | 04 | 73 | ||
| 1595 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 1651 | 00 | 03 | 94 | ||
| 1652 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 1654 | 00 | 00 | 29 | ||
| 1614 | 00 | 05 | 82 | ||
| 1650 | 00 | 02 | 01 | ||
| 1647 | 00 | 00 | 94 | ||
| 1617 | 00 | 00 | 66 | ||
| 1618 | 00 | 01 | 01 | ||
| 1616 | 00 | 05 | 91 | ||
| 1615 | 00 | 04 | 17 | ||
| 1631 | 00 | 07 | 29 | ||
| 1630 | 00 | 02 | 45 | ||
| 1632 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 2833 | 00 | 04 | 85 | ||
| 2834 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 252 | 00 | 06 | 29 | ||
| 251 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 250 | 00 | 02 | 17 | ||
| 231 | 00 | 01 | 06 | ||
| 220 | 00 | 00 | 50 | ||
| 221 | 00 | 24 | 97 | ||
| 2847 | 00 | 07 | 80 | ||
| Mokama | Kasaya Diyara Maranchi - 10 | 639 | 00 | 03 | 07 |
| 640 | 00 | 01 | 49 | ||
| 641 | 00 | 01 | 81 | ||
| 644 | 00 | 04 | 96 | ||
| 645 | 00 | 02 | 24 | ||
| 646 | 00 | 01 | 16 | ||
| 647 | 00 | 00 | 94 | ||
| 648 | 00 | 02 | 41 | ||
| 649 | 00 | 01 | 74 | ||
| 652 | 00 | 02 | 20 | ||
| 656 | 00 | 03 | 34 | ||
| 655 | 00 | 00 | 20 | ||
| 662 | 00 | 01 | 71 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/251/2017-OR-I/E-20885]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 57575757....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1071(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के
राजपत्र संख्या 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : को(cid:146)यालगुडेम िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए:
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपOरेशन िलमिटेड में निहित होगा।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्ष ेत्रफल |
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| कोयालागुडेम | क ं का6िपुरम | 95 | 00 | 13 | 97 |
| 98/1 | 00 | 00 | 35 | ||
| 91 | 00 | 59 | 02 | ||
| 88/2 | 00 | 05 | 78 | ||
| 89 | 00 | 51 | 75 | ||
| 68/4 | 00 | 04 | 25 | ||
| 69/1 | 00 | 16 | 06 | ||
| 69/2 | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 70/1 | 00 | 02 | 12 | ||
| 65/3 | 00 | 38 | 19 | ||
| 65/1 | 00 | 08 | 71 | ||
| 64/2 | 00 | 19 | 90 | ||
| 55/3 | 00 | 10 | 92 | ||
| 55/1 | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 55/2 | 00 | 05 | 01 | ||
| 59/9 | 00 | 05 | 40 | ||
| 59/8 | 00 | 05 | 48 | ||
| 59/7 | 00 | 06 | 35 | ||
| 59/6 | 00 | 12 | 83 | ||
| 59/4 | 00 | 05 | 75 | ||
| 59/3 | 00 | 03 | 20 | ||
| 59/1 | 00 | 03 | 18 | ||
| कोयालागुडेम | य ेरर्म्पेटा | 232/4 | 00 | 03 | 31 |
| 233 | 00 | 31 | 73 | ||
| 230/2 | 00 | 25 | 57 | ||
| 229/1 | 00 | 08 | 81 | ||
| 235/1 | 00 | 18 | 88 | ||
| 228/3 | 00 | 17 | 01 | ||
| 236 | 00 | 02 | 68 | ||
| 237/1 | 00 | 22 | 93 | ||
| 221/3 | 00 | 07 | 28 | ||
| 220/3 | 00 | 14 | 44 | ||
| 220/1 | 00 | 23 | 55 | ||
| 220/2 | 00 | 06 | 68 | ||
| 218 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 198/2 | 00 | 00 | 0.19 | ||
| 198/3 | 00 | 17 | 97 | ||
| 199 | 00 | 00 | 81 | ||
| 200/3 | 00 | 15 | 99 | ||
| 200/4 | 00 | 21 | 18 | ||
| 212/2 | 00 | 03 | 53 | ||
| 212/1 | 00 | 05 | 05 | ||
| 212/4 | 00 | 00 | 07 | ||
| 200/5 | 00 | 04 | 11 | ||
| 201/6 | 00 | 15 | 59 | ||
| 201/5 | 00 | 03 | 81 | ||
| 201/4 | 00 | 09 | 28 | ||
| 201/3 | 00 | 02 | 81 | ||
| 202/1 | 00 | 09 | 15 | ||
| 183 | 00 | 42 | 53 | ||
| कोयालागुडेम | राजवाराम | 518 | 00 | 12 | 12 |
| 516 | 00 | 22 | 11 | ||
| 509/1 | 00 | 01 | 55 | ||
| 509/2 | 00 | 16 | 88 | ||
| 510 | 00 | 02 | 93 | ||
| 508 | 00 | 27 | 81 | ||
| 507 | 00 | 10 | 81 | ||
| 495 | 00 | 05 | 84 | ||
| 496/6 | 00 | 04 | 99 | ||
| 496/5 | 00 | 03 | 70 | ||
| 496/4 | 00 | 01 | 73 | ||
| 496/3 | 00 | 00 | 06 | ||
| 490/1 | 00 | 18 | 65 | ||
| 490/2 | 00 | 16 | 88 | ||
| 488/1 | 00 | 00 | 08 | ||
| 488/2 | 00 | 01 | 90 | ||
| 489/2 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 486/2 | 00 | 21 | 19 | ||
| 485 | 00 | 45 | 21 | ||
| 484/1 | 00 | 01 | 09 | ||
| 245/2 | 00 | 00 | 09 | ||
| 248/3 | 00 | 07 | 36 | ||
| 248/2 | 00 | 14 | 71 | ||
| 248/1 | 00 | 03 | 24 | ||
| 245/1 | 00 | 17 | 28 | ||
| 246/2 | 00 | 03 | 95 | ||
| 246/1 | 00 | 01 | 49 | ||
| 239/1 | 00 | 13 | 31 | ||
| 239/3 | 00 | 18 | 38 | ||
| 239/2 | 00 | 07 | 35 | ||
| 238/1 | 00 | 09 | 87 | ||
| 225/1 | 00 | 06 | 01 | ||
| 225/2 | 00 | 20 | 57 | ||
| 225/3 | 00 | 06 | 04 | ||
| 223/4 | 00 | 09 | 60 | ||
| 223/3 | 00 | 08 | 57 | ||
| 223/2 | 00 | 07 | 97 | ||
| 223/1 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 222/B | 00 | 15 | 25 | ||
| 222/A | 00 | 11 | 85 | ||
| 229 | 00 | 00 | 90 | ||
| 220/3 | 00 | 13 | 21 | ||
| 220/2 | 00 | 22 | 23 | ||
| 220/1 | 00 | 01 | 86 | ||
| 218 | 00 | 04 | 52 | ||
| 219/1 | 00 | 10 | 90 | ||
| 219/2 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 219/3A | 00 | 06 | 75 | ||
| 212 | 00 | 00 | 14 | ||
| 211/1 | 00 | 17 | 81 | ||
| 210/2A | 00 | 21 | 88 | ||
| 210/1A | 00 | 15 | 98 | ||
| 210/3A | 00 | 21 | 88 | ||
| 209/2A | 00 | 18 | 65 | ||
| 209/1A | 00 | 27 | 46 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 57.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1071 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Koyyalagudem, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the163 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District : West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Koyyalagudem | Kankadripuram | 95 | 00 | 13 | 97 |
| 98/1 | 00 | 00 | 35 | ||
| 91 | 00 | 59 | 02 | ||
| 88/2 | 00 | 05 | 78 | ||
| 89 | 00 | 51 | 75 | ||
| 68/4 | 00 | 04 | 25 | ||
| 69/1 | 00 | 16 | 06 | ||
| 69/2 | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 70/1 | 00 | 02 | 12 | ||
| 65/3 | 00 | 38 | 19 | ||
| 65/1 | 00 | 08 | 71 | ||
| 64/2 | 00 | 19 | 90 | ||
| 55/3 | 00 | 10 | 92 | ||
| 55/1 | 00 | 16 | 13 | ||
| 55/2 | 00 | 05 | 01 | ||
| 59/9 | 00 | 05 | 40 | ||
| 59/8 | 00 | 05 | 48 | ||
| 59/7 | 00 | 06 | 35 | ||
| 59/6 | 00 | 12 | 83 | ||
| 59/4 | 00 | 05 | 75 | ||
| 59/3 | 00 | 03 | 20 | ||
| 59/1 | 00 | 03 | 18 | ||
| Koyyalagudem | Yerrampeta | 232/4 | 00 | 03 | 31 |
| 233 | 00 | 31 | 73 | ||
| 230/2 | 00 | 25 | 57 | ||
| 229/1 | 00 | 08 | 81 | ||
| 235/1 | 00 | 18 | 88 | ||
| 228/3 | 00 | 17 | 01 | ||
| 236 | 00 | 02 | 68 | ||
| 237/1 | 00 | 22 | 93 | ||
| 221/3 | 00 | 07 | 28 | ||
| 220/3 | 00 | 14 | 44 | ||
| 220/1 | 00 | 23 | 55 | ||
| 220/2 | 00 | 06 | 68 | ||
| 218 | 00 | 00 | 59 | ||
| 198/2 | 00 | 00 | 0.19 | ||
| 198/3 | 00 | 17 | 97 | ||
| 199 | 00 | 00 | 81 | ||
| 200/3 | 00 | 15 | 99 | ||
| 200/4 | 00 | 21 | 18 | ||
| 212/2 | 00 | 03 | 53 | ||
| 212/1 | 00 | 05 | 05 | ||
| 212/4 | 00 | 00 | 07 | ||
| 200/5 | 00 | 04 | 11 | ||
| 201/6 | 00 | 15 | 59 | ||
| 201/5 | 00 | 03 | 81 | ||
| 201/4 | 00 | 09 | 28 | ||
| 201/3 | 00 | 02 | 81 | ||
| 202/1 | 00 | 09 | 15 | ||
| 183 | 00 | 42 | 53 | ||
| Koyyalagudem | Rajavaram | 518 | 00 | 12 | 12 |
| 516 | 00 | 22 | 11 | ||
| 509/1 | 00 | 01 | 55 | ||
| 509/2 | 00 | 16 | 88 | ||
| 510 | 00 | 02 | 93 | ||
| 508 | 00 | 27 | 81 | ||
| 507 | 00 | 10 | 81 | ||
| 495 | 00 | 05 | 84 | ||
| 496/6 | 00 | 04 | 99 | ||
| 496/5 | 00 | 03 | 70 | ||
| 496/4 | 00 | 01 | 73 | ||
| 496/3 | 00 | 00 | 06 | ||
| 490/1 | 00 | 18 | 65 | ||
| 490/2 | 00 | 16 | 88 | ||
| 488/1 | 00 | 00 | 08 | ||
| 488/2 | 00 | 01 | 90 | ||
| 489/2 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 486/2 | 00 | 21 | 19 | ||
| 485 | 00 | 45 | 21 | ||
| 484/1 | 00 | 01 | 09 | ||
| 245/2 | 00 | 00 | 09 | ||
| 248/3 | 00 | 07 | 36 | ||
| 248/2 | 00 | 14 | 71 | ||
| 248/1 | 00 | 03 | 24 | ||
| 245/1 | 00 | 17 | 28 | ||
| 246/2 | 00 | 03 | 95 | ||
| 246/1 | 00 | 01 | 49 | ||
| 239/1 | 00 | 13 | 31 | ||
| 239/3 | 00 | 18 | 38 | ||
| 239/2 | 00 | 07 | 35 | ||
| 238/1 | 00 | 09 | 87 | ||
| 225/1 | 00 | 06 | 01 | ||
| 225/2 | 00 | 20 | 57 | ||
| 225/3 | 00 | 06 | 04 | ||
| 223/4 | 00 | 09 | 60 | ||
| 223/3 | 00 | 08 | 57 | ||
| 223/2 | 00 | 07 | 97 | ||
| 223/1 | 00 | 01 | 35 | ||
| 222/B | 00 | 15 | 25 | ||
| 222/A | 00 | 11 | 85 | ||
| 229 | 00 | 00 | 90 | ||
| 220/3 | 00 | 13 | 21 | ||
| 220/2 | 00 | 22 | 23 | ||
| 220/1 | 00 | 01 | 86 | ||
| 218 | 00 | 04 | 52 | ||
| 219/1 | 00 | 10 | 90 | ||
| 219/2 | 00 | 07 | 15 | ||
| 219/3A | 00 | 06 | 75 | ||
| 212 | 00 | 00 | 14 | ||
| 211/1 | 00 | 17 | 81 | ||
| 210/2A | 00 | 21 | 88 | ||
| 210/1A | 00 | 15 | 98 | ||
| 210/3A | 00 | 21 | 88 | ||
| 209/2A | 00 | 18 | 65 | ||
| 209/1A | 00 | 27 | 46 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 58585858....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1072(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 948, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में166 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : पोलावरम िजला: प(िcid:135)म गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
| जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्ष ेत्र फल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| पोलावरम | गुटाला | 833/3A | 00 | 09 | 98 |
| 833/2 | 00 | 03 | 93 | ||
| 833/4 | 00 | 07 | 84 | ||
| 831/2 | 00 | 02 | 46 | ||
| 831/3 | 00 | 28 | 12 | ||
| 832/1 | 00 | 07 | 86 | ||
| 806/2 | 00 | 21 | 78 | ||
| 806/1 | 00 | 01 | 96 | ||
| 807 | 00 | 26 | 72 | ||
| 797 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 796/2 | 00 | 00 | 80 | ||
| 789/3 | 00 | 36 | 11 | ||
| 789/2 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 790/1A | 00 | 05 | 85 | ||
| 790/3 | 00 | 15 | 14 | ||
| 790/2 | 00 | 08 | 57 | ||
| 791/2 | 00 | 01 | 07 | ||
| 791/1 | 00 | 12 | 57 | ||
| 774/1 | 00 | 04 | 54 | ||
| 774/2 | 00 | 21 | 33 | ||
| 773/1 | 00 | 11 | 88 | ||
| 768/7 | 00 | 13 | 18 | ||
| 769/4 | 00 | 15 | 80 | ||
| 769/3 | 00 | 21 | 96 | ||
| 769/2 | 00 | 04 | 51 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 58.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 948 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1072 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal polavaram, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District : West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Polavaram | Gutala | 833/3A | 00 | 09 | 98 |
| 833/2 | 00 | 03 | 93 | ||
| 833/4 | 00 | 07 | 84 | ||
| 831/2 | 00 | 02 | 46 | ||
| 831/3 | 00 | 28 | 12 | ||
| 832/1 | 00 | 07 | 86 | ||
| 806/2 | 00 | 21 | 78 | ||
| 806/1 | 00 | 01 | 96 | ||
| 807 | 00 | 26 | 72 | ||
| 797 | 00 | 01 | 18 | ||
| 796/2 | 00 | 00 | 80 | ||
| 789/3 | 00 | 36 | 11 | ||
| 789/2 | 00 | 18 | 47 | ||
| 790/1A | 00 | 05 | 85 | ||
| 790/3 | 00 | 15 | 14 | ||
| 790/2 | 00 | 08 | 57 | ||
| 791/2 | 00 | 01 | 07 | ||
| 791/1 | 00 | 12 | 57 | ||
| 774/1 | 00 | 04 | 54 | ||
| 774/2 | 00 | 21 | 33 | ||
| 773/1 | 00 | 11 | 88 | ||
| 768/7 | 00 | 13 | 18 | ||
| 769/4 | 00 | 15 | 80 | ||
| 769/3 | 00 | 21 | 96 | ||
| 769/2 | 00 | 04 | 51 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 59595959....————के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1070(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल : जंगारेद्दीगूडेम िजला: प(िcid:135)म गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
169 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन
बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूचि में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया
जाए:
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| ज ंगारेीगुडेम | निम्मालागुडेम | 199 | 00 | 00 | 10 |
| 198 | 00 | 31 | 14 | ||
| 254 | 00 | 61 | 85 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 59.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1070 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Jangareddigudem, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the170 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District : West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Jangareddigudem | Nimmalagudem | 199 | 00 | 00 | 10 |
| 198 | 00 | 31 | 14 | ||
| 254 | 00 | 61 | 85 |
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 11 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 60606060....———— के न्6ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके प(cid:135)ात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का.आ. 1069(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 जिसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 947, भाग II, खGड 3, उप खGड (II) तारीख 06.04.2017 में किया गया है। इस अधिसूचना में संल(cid:136) अनुसूची में विनिzर्दष्ट आंLप्रदेश राज्य के मंडल: देवरापल्ली िजला: वेस्ट गोदावरी की भूमि में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा $ियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के लिए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थk। और उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्6ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्6ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के प(cid:135)ात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूचि में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए:
और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| जिला: वेस्ट गोदावरी राज्य: आन्Lप्रदेश | |||||
| म ंडल का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| देवरापल्ली | यदावोलु | 153/1 | 00 | 02 | 84 |
| 153/2 | 00 | 15 | 33 | ||
| 156 | 00 | 34 | 71 | ||
| 157 | 00 | 08 | 79 | ||
| 184/4 | 00 | 01 | 39 | ||
| 184/2 | 00 | 42 | 37 | ||
| 173/2 | 00 | 45 | 57 | ||
| 173/3 | 00 | 02 | 95 | ||
| 174 | 00 | 17 | 64 | ||
| 175/2 | 00 | 11 | 66 | ||
| 178 | 00 | 06 | 84 | ||
| 176/2 | 00 | 44 | 48 | ||
| 177/1 | 00 | 27 | 51 | ||
| 107 | 00 | 46 | 42 | ||
| 109 | 00 | 01 | 70 | ||
| 108 | 00 | 01 | 61 | ||
| 119/3 | 00 | 02 | 23 | ||
| 110/2 | 00 | 17 | 94 | ||
| 110/3 | 00 | 05 | 90 | ||
| 119/2 | 00 | 00 | 39 | ||
| 119/1 | 00 | 07 | 02 | ||
| 118/8 | 00 | 16 | 27 | ||
| 118/5B | 00 | 00 | 41 | ||
| 118/7C | 00 | 07 | 58 | ||
| 255/2A | 00 | 00 | 10 | ||
| 255/1D | 00 | 02 | 03 | ||
| 255/1A | 00 | 02 | 99 | ||
| 259 | 00 | 34 | 09 | ||
| 258 | 00 | 10 | 25 | ||
| 263 | 00 | 28 | 82 | ||
| 60 | 00 | 03 | 11 | ||
| 59/1 | 00 | 18 | 63 | ||
| 59/2 | 00 | 03 | 54 | ||
| 59/3 | 00 | 03 | 43 | ||
| 59/4 | 00 | 03 | 87 | ||
| 59/5 | 00 | 10 | 47 | ||
| 475/1 | 00 | 12 | 64 | ||
| 475/3 | 00 | 00 | 34 | ||
| 475/2 | 00 | 03 | 45 | ||
| 476 | 00 | 06 | 78 | ||
| 474/5 | 00 | 10 | 35 | ||
| 474/2 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 474/3 | 00 | 10 | 76 | ||
| 473 | 00 | 10 | 63 | ||
| 472/3 | 00 | 30 | 80 | ||
| 472/2 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 487/2 | 00 | 16 | 84 | ||
| 488/1 | 00 | 06 | 08 | ||
| 488/2 | 00 | 37 | 55 | ||
| 489/5 | 00 | 18 | 80 | ||
| 490 | 00 | 05 | 54 | ||
| 717/5 | 00 | 00 | 38 | ||
| 717/4 | 00 | 04 | 88 | ||
| 717/3 | 00 | 17 | 30 | ||
| 717/2 | 00 | 05 | 86 | ||
| 716/1 | 00 | 14 | 29 | ||
| 715 | 00 | 09 | 73 | ||
| 711 | 00 | 09 | 82 | ||
| 713 | 00 | 12 | 66 | ||
| 712 | 00 | 29 | 98 | ||
| 708 | 00 | 27 | 63 | ||
| 707 | 00 | 12 | 01 | ||
| 706 | 00 | 13 | 58 | ||
| 513/6 | 00 | 07 | 43 | ||
| 513/5 | 00 | 08 | 64 | ||
| 513/4 | 00 | 04 | 53 | ||
| 513/3 | 00 | 04 | 38 | ||
| 513/2 | 00 | 08 | 70 | ||
| 513/1 | 00 | 09 | 71 | ||
| 514 | 00 | 00 | 38 | ||
| 518 | 00 | 45 | 72 | ||
| 519/1 | 00 | 18 | 13 | ||
| 520/1 | 00 | 34 | 99 | ||
| 532/1 | 00 | 16 | 70 | ||
| 532/3 | 00 | 12 | 97 | ||
| 585 | 00 | 22 | 83 | ||
| 586/2 | 00 | 16 | 09 | ||
| 586/1 | 00 | 15 | 12 | ||
| 587/1 | 00 | 11 | 40 | ||
| 587/2 | 00 | 16 | 61 | ||
| 551 | 00 | 08 | 72 | ||
| 555 | 00 | 34 | 66 | ||
| 556/2B | 00 | 03 | 96 | ||
| 556/2C | 00 | 11 | 74 | ||
| 556/1 | 00 | 15 | 23 | ||
| 557/3 | 00 | 09 | 90 | ||
| 570 | 00 | 36 | 96 | ||
| 569 | 00 | 32 | 24 | ||
| 568 | 00 | 26 | 38 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
पवन कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 11th January, 2018
S.O. 60.— Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 947 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 06.04.2017 vide S.O. Number 1069 (E) dated 03.04.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Mandal Devarapalli, District West Godavari in Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District: West Godavari | State : Andhra Pradesh | ||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Devarapalli | Yadavolu | 153/1 | 00 | 02 | 84 |
| 153/2 | 00 | 15 | 33 | ||
| 156 | 00 | 34 | 71 | ||
| 157 | 00 | 08 | 79 | ||
| 184/4 | 00 | 01 | 39 | ||
| 184/2 | 00 | 42 | 37 | ||
| 173/2 | 00 | 45 | 57 | ||
| 173/3 | 00 | 02 | 95 | ||
| 174 | 00 | 17 | 64 | ||
| 175/2 | 00 | 11 | 66 | ||
| 178 | 00 | 06 | 84 | ||
| 176/2 | 00 | 44 | 48 | ||
| 177/1 | 00 | 27 | 51 | ||
| 107 | 00 | 46 | 42 | ||
| 109 | 00 | 01 | 70 | ||
| 108 | 00 | 01 | 61 | ||
| 119/3 | 00 | 02 | 23 | ||
| 110/2 | 00 | 17 | 94 | ||
| 110/3 | 00 | 05 | 90 | ||
| 119/2 | 00 | 00 | 39 | ||
| 119/1 | 00 | 07 | 02 | ||
| 118/8 | 00 | 16 | 27 | ||
| 118/5B | 00 | 00 | 41 | ||
| 118/7C | 00 | 07 | 58 | ||
| 255/2A | 00 | 00 | 10 | ||
| 255/1D | 00 | 02 | 03 | ||
| 255/1A | 00 | 02 | 99 | ||
| 259 | 00 | 34 | 09 | ||
| 258 | 00 | 10 | 25 | ||
| 263 | 00 | 28 | 82 | ||
| 60 | 00 | 03 | 11 | ||
| 59/1 | 00 | 18 | 63 | ||
| 59/2 | 00 | 03 | 54 | ||
| 59/3 | 00 | 03 | 43 | ||
| 59/4 | 00 | 03 | 87 | ||
| 59/5 | 00 | 10 | 47 | ||
| 475/1 | 00 | 12 | 64 | ||
| 475/3 | 00 | 00 | 34 | ||
| 475/2 | 00 | 03 | 45 | ||
| 476 | 00 | 06 | 78 | ||
| 474/5 | 00 | 10 | 35 | ||
| 474/2 | 00 | 03 | 40 | ||
| 474/3 | 00 | 10 | 76 | ||
| 473 | 00 | 10 | 63 | ||
| 472/3 | 00 | 30 | 80 | ||
| 472/2 | 00 | 00 | 42 | ||
| 487/2 | 00 | 16 | 84 | ||
| 488/1 | 00 | 06 | 08 | ||
| 488/2 | 00 | 37 | 55 | ||
| 489/5 | 00 | 18 | 80 | ||
| 490 | 00 | 05 | 54 | ||
| 717/5 | 00 | 00 | 38 | ||
| 717/4 | 00 | 04 | 88 | ||
| 717/3 | 00 | 17 | 30 | ||
| 717/2 | 00 | 05 | 86 | ||
| 716/1 | 00 | 14 | 29 | ||
| 715 | 00 | 09 | 73 | ||
| 711 | 00 | 09 | 82 | ||
| 713 | 00 | 12 | 66 | ||
| 712 | 00 | 29 | 98 | ||
| 708 | 00 | 27 | 63 | ||
| 707 | 00 | 12 | 01 | ||
| 706 | 00 | 13 | 58 | ||
| 513/6 | 00 | 07 | 43 | ||
| 513/5 | 00 | 08 | 64 | ||
| 513/4 | 00 | 04 | 53 | ||
| 513/3 | 00 | 04 | 38 | ||
| 513/2 | 00 | 08 | 70 | ||
| 513/1 | 00 | 09 | 71 | ||
| 514 | 00 | 00 | 38 | ||
| 518 | 00 | 45 | 72 | ||
| 519/1 | 00 | 18 | 13 | ||
| 520/1 | 00 | 34 | 99 | ||
| 532/1 | 00 | 16 | 70 | ||
| 532/3 | 00 | 12 | 97 | ||
| 585 | 00 | 22 | 83 | ||
| 586/2 | 00 | 16 | 09 | ||
| 586/1 | 00 | 15 | 12 | ||
| 587/1 | 00 | 11 | 40 | ||
| 587/2 | 00 | 16 | 61 | ||
| 551 | 00 | 08 | 72 | ||
| 555 | 00 | 34 | 66 | ||
| 556/2B | 00 | 03 | 96 | ||
| 556/2C | 00 | 11 | 74 | ||
| 556/1 | 00 | 15 | 23 | ||
| 557/3 | 00 | 09 | 90 | ||
| 570 | 00 | 36 | 96 | ||
| 569 | 00 | 32 | 24 | ||
| 568 | 00 | 26 | 38 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
PAWAN KUMAR, Under Secy.
179 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्राालय
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 61.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ओ.एन.जी.सी. लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में
केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 11/2016द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/39/2015-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 61.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2016) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/39/2015-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 11/2016
1. The Executive Director – Asset Manager,
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
2. The Incharge (HR - IR),
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
3. The Dy. General Manager (P) ST,
ONGC Ltd., Avani Bhavan, 5th Floor, Chandkheda, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad
4. M/s D.B. Enterprises,
G-8, Sukan Mall, Behind Vishat Petrol Pump, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) …First Party
V/s
The President, Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh, A/3, PriyaDarshini Society,Near New Railway Colony, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380019
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : Shri S.N. Gandhi180 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/39/2015-IR(M) dated 07.01.2016 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad through its contractor M/s D.B. Enterprises, Ahmedabad in discontinuing/terminating the services of two workmen Shri Mangaji J. Yadav w.e.f. 28.04.2015 without following the procedure prescribed under Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947 during the pendency of his claim for regularization in services of ONGC Ltd., before CGIT, Ahmedabad and Shri Pradipkumar S. Nai without following the procedure prescribed under 'Fair Wage Settlement' is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workmen S/Shri Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai are entitled to and what directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 07.01.2016.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 2 on 21.04.2016 alleging that the second party union Glorious Petroleum Mazdoor Sangh is a registered union under the trade union act and both the concerning workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai were the members of the aforesaid union who were working with the first party ONGC Ltd., hereinafter referred to as ONGC through their respective contractors since more than 25 years. During the tenure of their services, there was no complaint against them regarding their work and conduct. They have also worked for more than 240 days in each and every calendar year. It has been further alleged that at the time of impugned action, they were working with the first party No. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises, hereinafter referred to as M/s D.B. Enterprises, a labour contractor. It has been further alleged that as per the policy of ONGC whenever there any contractor is changed, list of the contract workers engaged by the previous contractor has been provided to the new contractor so that the new contractor be mandated to continue with the contract workmen of the earlier contractor. It has been further alleged that both the workmen worked for more than 25 years as unskilled and skilled operator workers respectively and lastly they have been working with the contractor namely M/s D.B. Enterprises. It has been further alleged that a criminal complaint was registered against the aforesaid workmen by the first party under the wrong and false criminal complaint wherein they have been put under suspension for 1½ months, later it was revoked by an oral order and the workmen were reinstated in their service with continuity of service and worked for more than 2½ years till 27.04.2015. Thereafter, suddenly on 28.04.2015, both the concerned workmen received a letter from M/s D.B. Enterprises informing that they are debarred w.e.f. 28.04.2015 from performing any duty in ONGC till they are proved innocent by the competent court. The second party union submitted the copy of the aforesaid letters vide Ex. 11/1 and 11/2. It has been further alleged that on 28.04.2015, workmen were also terminated from the service without giving them any opportunity to defend themselves. No departmental inquiry was also conducted. It has been further alleged that the workman Mangaji J. Yadav was a protected workman and his case was pending for regularisation in CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad. The said contention was admitted by the first party in their letter dated 28.04.2015 Ex. 11/3 and 22.06.2015 Ex. 11/4 submitted before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Central, Ahmedabad. It has been further alleged that the workman Pradeepkumar Nai was covered under Fair Wage Settlement Scheme providing job security to the contract workmen as per the provisions of the aforesaid settlement scheme. It was the pre-condition in the aforesaid settlement scheme for the management to give full opportunity to defend him and to conduct departmental inquiry into the misconduct of the workman and his services cannot be terminated unless the misconduct is proved. The copy of the settlement scheme is submitted vide Ex. 15/4. It has been further alleged that no such opportunity of defending himself and conducting departmental inquiry was done in the matter. It has been further alleged that while terminating their services, the workmen were not paid any retrenchment compensation or legal dues. Thus the impugned action was violative of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D. Act. It has been further alleged that the workmen were subjected to Criminal Trial vid Criminal Case No. 843/2009 before the Judicial Magistrate first class, Gandhinagar who acquitted them in the said case following the charge of theft vide judgement dated 10.08.2016. The copy of the judgement is at Ex. 12/1 and 12/2.
2. The first party ONGC filed their written statement Ex. 10 on 19.12.2016 submitted that both the concerned workmen were contract workmen and their services were terminated by their contractor w.e.f. 28.04.2015 in an alleged theft case with a condition that till they are not proved innocent by the competent Magistrate, they will not be re-engaged. Thus their services were not terminated by ONGC. Therefore, no relief can be granted against the ONGC.
3. The first party No. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises were served vide notice date 28.09.2017 but M/s D.B. Enterprises did not prefer to appear and submit the written statement. Thus the case against M/s D.B. Enterprises proceed ex-parte vide order dated 28.09.2017. Therefore, the second party who earlier submitted their affidavit Ex. 13 and 14 were taken on record. ONGC cross-examined them wherein both the workmen admitted that they used to work under a contractor named M/s D.B. Enterprises and they were not given any appointment letter and were also not served with any termination letter by ONGC.
181 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 19394. Thus it is a case wherein no relief can be granted to the workmen against the ONGC.
5. M/s D.B. Enterprises despite service of notice twice vide Ex. 8 on 18.09.2016, thereafter Ex. 16 on 28.09.2017, did not prefer to submit his written statement or submissions. The documents Ex. 12/1 and 12/2 clearly establishes that both the workmen were acquitted for the charge of theft and it is noteworthy that it was the preconditions of the termination letter Ex. 11/1 and 11/2 that the workmen will not be permitted to perform duties in ONGC unless proved innocent by the Competent Magistrate and as they have been acquitted by the Competent Magistrate and M/s D.B. Enterprises has refrained to challenge the reference by submitting written statement, thus this reference can be decided ex-parte against M/s D.B. Enterprises to engage the aforesaid workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai with immediate effect with all their seniority and other non-monetary benefits.
6. Thus the reference is disposed of accordingly and the first party no. 4 M/s D.B. Enterprises is directed to engage/employ the workmen namely Mangaji J. Yadav and Pradipkumar S. Nai immediately as and when they report to duty as per the terms and conditions said earlier.
7. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 62.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ओ.एन. जी.सी. लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 50/2012द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/10/2011-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 62.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2012) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial Dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/10/2011-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th Decemberr, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 50/2012
1. The Executive Director,
ONGC Limited, Ahmedabad Asset, Avani Bhawan, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
2. The Incharge (Security)
ONGC Limited, Avani Bhawan, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
3. The General Manager, Trig Guard Force Ltd., 119, Sarjan Tower, Nr. C.G Road, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad182 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 4. M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd.,
42, Astha Avenue, Nr. R.T.O., Subhas Bridge Circle, Ahmedabad …First Party
V/s
Shri C.K. Parmar, Secretary, Soshit Kamdar Sangh (Gujarat), 521/3372, JayshriLalimaNivas, Ambika Nagar, Gujarat Housing Board, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
…Second Party
For the First Party no's. 1 & 2 : Sh. K.V. Gadhia & Sh. M.K. Patel For the First Party No. 3 : Absent For the First Party No. 4 : Sh. Anil Parikh, Advocate For the Second Party : Sh. C.K. Parmar, Party in Person
AWARD
The Government of India/ Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 30011/10/2011-IR(M) dated:14.02.2012 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Ahmedabad in respect of the matter specified in the schedule.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the contractor of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri C. K. Parmar (Protected under court order) on the behest of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad and decategorising him from Security Supervisor to Security Guard and changing his service condition without following due process of law by the management of ONGC Ltd., Ahmedabad is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 14.02.2012. After the reference by the Appropriate Government, the Court issued notices vide Ex. 2 to the respective parties and in pursuance to the same, parties to the reference appeared before the Tribunal and filed their pleadings. The second party filed the Statement of Claims Ex. 7. The ONGC has appeared through its Advocate and filed its Written Statement vide Ex. 8. The First party No. 3 has chosen not to appear and the First Party No. 4 appeared through advocate and filed Written Statement vide Ex. 12.
2. The Second party appeared as a party in person and alleged in his Statement of claim that he had been working with ONGC under various contractors continuously since 1992 and worked as Security Guard with Opp. No. 3 till 30.06.2010. It is further alleged that he had been serving as a Security Supervisor since Feb. – 2006. But he was decategorised by the F.P. No. 3 without any rhyme or reason w.e.f. 02.06.2010. It is further alleged that he was then working with F.P. No. 4 and was illegally terminated. It is also alleged that case of regularization of various workers was pending before the Ld. Tribunal and that he was a Union leader fighting with the F.P. for the rights of other employees and therefore he was decategoriseddespite Interim Relief granted by tribunal in their favour in the main Reference and he was subsequently terminated.Thus the second party has prayed for reinstatement on original post with continuity in service and has also prayed to declare the action of decategorising him from security supervisor to security guard as illegal and also prayed for granting the benefits of Security Supervisor from June – 2010. He has also prayed for declaring the action of the ONGC to change his service condition as illegal and unjust and further prayed for cost of litigation.
3. The First Party No. 1 & 2 ONGC has filed it Written statement vide Ex. 8 and denied the averments made in the statement of claims. The ONGC has stated in true facts that there was no relation of master and servant relationship between the first party and the second party at any point of time. The ONGC has further stated that as per the Statement of Claims itself, the second party was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and terminated by F.P. No. 4 and hence prayed for rejection of reference qua ONGC. The ONGC has further stated that the reference is barred by principle of res-judicata as the Complaint No. 05/2011 filed by the second party for the same cause of action was dismissed. Hence it is prayed to reject the reference.
4. The First party No. 4 has also filed written statement Ex. 12 and denied the contentions raised in the Statement of Claims. As far as true facts are concerned, it is stated that the second party was working with them and was suspended on 01.07.2010 for serious misconducts and was also served with a charge sheet on 30.07.2010. It is further stated that a departmental inquiry was conducted and sufficient opportunity was given to the second party workman and inquiry officer submitted his report on 01.09.2010 giving finding that the charges were proved. The second party was then served with a second show cause notice dtd: - 03.09.2010 on the aforesaid inquiry report and on the point of183 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 punishment but he did not reply to the said notice, therefore, he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 01.10.2010. Thus in view of the same, the F.P. No. 3 has prayed for rejection of reference.
5. The Second party examined himself in the matter and was also cross examined by first party no. 1, 2 & 4. The first party No. 4 has also examined his witness Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma in the matter who was cross examined by second party and all the first parties. The F.P. No. 4 has produced a list of documents including inquiry report. On the other hand the second party also filed number of documents in the matter. During the course of proceedings, the second party has also given various applications/affidavits and also brought on record the previous litigation between the parties and the orders thereof. The Second party and F.P. No. 4 have given written arguments in the matter while the Ld. Advocate for the F.P. Nos. 1 & 2 have made oral submissions in the matter.
6. Considering the materials and evidences on record, the submissions of the parties and the terms of reference as formed by the appropriate government, the issues that fall for consideration are:
I. Whether the termination of the Second Party by the Contractor M/s. Max Vigil Security Pvt. Ltd. is legal and justified?
II. Whether the action of ONGC in decategorising the second party from Security Supervisor to Security guard is legal and justified?
III. If not, what relief the second party is entitled to?
6.1 Issue I
The burden of proof of this issues lies on second party, workman. From the terms of reference, the pleadings of the second party in the statement of claims and thereafter as well as pleadings of the ONGC and the contractor, one thing that is clear is that the second party was working with the F.P. No. – 4 herein. Hence, there was a relation of master and servant between the second party and the F.P. No.4. Secondly, the fact that the second party is terminated is also an admitted fact. What is required to be determined here is whether, the said termination is just and legal. In this connection, the second party has stated that he was terminated on 01.07.2010 without following the due process of law. As against this, the witness of F.P. No. 4 Mr. Santosh Mojiram Sharma stated that he was suspended on 01.07.2010 and terminated on 01.10.2010 after a departmental inquiry. The second party has appeared as a party in person and has not taken assistance of any legal counsel in the matter. The F.P. No. 4 has also produced the inquiry proceedings on record to support its case. However, what is borne out from the record is that the F.P. No. 4 has not paid suspension/subsistence allowance to the second party during the pendency of the inquiry. Moreover, the inquiry was for most of the time conducted in absence of the second party. The list of witnesses relied upon by the management was also not provided to the second party. Moreover, the first date of inquiry was kept on 13.08.2010 for which notice was issued on 09.08.2010. The second party on that day gave an application for change in venue of the proceedings. Now this Tribunal cannot decide the venue of the proceedings as it is the discretion of the management alone. However, without deciding the same, the inquiry officer in no time fixed another date of the proceedings at the same place on 18.08.2010. The Second party again did not remain present. On that day, the witnesses of the management were examined. The proceedings are then postponed to 27.08.2010. The second party again chose not to remain present and therefore the inquiry proceeding was concluded on the said date. The Inquiry officer has then on 01.09.2010 submitted inquiry report. Subsequent thereto on 03.09.2010 itself, the management has given a second show cause notice to the second party and directed him to reply to the same within 72 hours on why he should not be dismissed failing which management will take proposed action against him. Thus it is clear from the above dates and proceedings that the inquiry was conducted in a hasty manner and decision of dismissal was also taken in haste. This Tribunal is aware of the fact that the charges are serious in nature wherein the second party has not only abused a superior but also damaged Government property and left without any permission or authorization. However, the principles of natural justice demand that the delinquent be given sufficient opportunity to disprove the charges and prove his innocence. The management has already framed the charges and communicated the same on 30.07.2010 to the second party. The same was not replied by the second party and hence inquiry proceedings were initiated. Thus, this Tribunal is of the opinion that the Second party may be given a chance to reply to the charge sheet and the management may then take a decision on whether to initiate inquiry or not. If the management decides to initiate the inquiry then the second party may be given reasonable opportunity to defend himself. The management may provide the list of witnesses and documents that may be relied upon before hand to the second party and the same is expected from the second party. On conclusion of the inquiry proceedings, reasonable time may be granted to both the sides to submit their briefs and then again to counter the findings of the inquiry officer and further notice, if any. In nut shell, the entire process from the point of reply to the charge sheet is required to be done afresh. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, as well as the fact that the second party appeared as party-in-person and also considering the fact that the first inquiry was conducted virtually in ex-parte manner against the second party workman.
184 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]The apex court in Brijbihari Singh V/s Bihar State Financial Corporation, 216(1) CLR 344, held that it is a well settled principle of law where a person/employee was required to answer charges labeled against him should know not only the acquisition against him but also the testimony of the witnesses by which the charges were alleged to be proved. The departure from the aforesaid requirements of principles of law definitely violates the principles of natural justice and therefore, the inquiry held against the delinquent employee is vitiated.
Thus it will be in fitness of things, if the said exercise is carried out in house as far as the present issue is concerned. It is needless to clarify here that any order passed will be subject to rights of the parties to challenge it before the appropriate forum. If the management sticks to its earlier decision, then the question of intervening period will not be of much consequence. However, if the relief is granted, then the disciplinary authority may modify the punishment accordingly.
6.2 Issue II
As far as the present issue is concerned, from the statement of claims itself, it is clear that the second party was earlier working with the F.P. No. 3 and he was decategorised from security supervisor to security guard by the said party. Moreover, the ONGC has also contended that the second party was never appointed by them. The terms of reference are that whether the action of the ONGC in decategorising the second party is just and legal or not. However, from the pleadings of the second party himself, it is clear that he was decategorised by F.P. No. 3 and not ONGC. Moreover, the Tribunal cannot traverse beyond the terms of reference. Thus no relief can be granted to the second party against ONGC in the present issue.
7. In view of the above, the matter is sent back to the Disciplinary Authority to proceed fresh inquiry and pass a reasoned order after giving full opportunity of hearing to the workman as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Brij Bihar Singh Vs. Bihar State financial Corporation & Ors. reported in 2016 I CLR 344.
8. The F.P. No. 4 will also be required to pay subsistence allowance from the date of commence of fresh departmental proceedings to till the date of final order if any, to be passed by the F.P. No. 4. Thus the reference is disposed off with above observations.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 63.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ओ.एन. जी.सी. लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 67/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/8/2009-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 63.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 67/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/8/2009-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 20th November, 2017185 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
Reference: (CGITA) No. 67/2010
1. The Asset Manager,
ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Asset, Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
2. The Chief Manager (Security),
ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar
3. M/s Tops Security Ltd.,
C-I, Hariom Shopping, Nr. Overbridge, Opp. Jublee Guest House, Old National Highway, Ankleshwar
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, ONG Mazdoor Sangh, ONGC Office, Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu For the Second Party : Shri A.N. Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/8/2009- IR(M) dated 29.07.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"The Security Section of ONGC is a "registered establishment" under the Contract Labour (R&A) Act, 1970 and the Contractor had obtained prescribed Labour License under the Act. Hence the dispute raised is not maintainable."
1. The reference dates back to 29.07.2009. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 8 on 03.04.2010 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 16 on 21.04.2010 along with vakalatpatra Ex. 17 of his advocate.
2. Since then the second party union did not lead evidence; however on 05.11.2015, The General Secretary, R.H. Pathan ONG Mazdoor Sangh moved an application Ex. 33 for withdrawal from the reference of 165 workmen named in the application.
3. Since then the second party union has been absent and has not been leading evidence.
4. Thus it appears that the second party union is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 64.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स टाटा केमिकल्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 101/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29012/82/2008-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 64.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 101/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/82/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
186 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 101/2010
The Manager, Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva, Navapara, Adityana, Ranavav, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/82/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not providing employment to Shri Laxman Devshi Bhuva, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on 23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 15 stating that the first party has agreed to pay Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 15. The settlement Ex. 15 shall be part of the award.
3. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 65.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स टाटा केमिकल्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 105/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29012/81/2008-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव187 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 65.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 105/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/81/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 105/2010
The Manager, Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya, Ganesh Oil Centre, Opp. Post Office Station Plot, Ranavav -2, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri RamsinghThakor
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/81/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not providing employment to Shri Mohan Kana Borichiya, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on 23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of the award.
3. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 66.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स टाटा केमिकल्स लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार188 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 113/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29012/80/2008-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 66.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 113/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Tata Chemicals Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/80/2008-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 23rd November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 113/2010
The Manager, Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav Quarry Office, Ranavav, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda, Behind Patel Samaj, Adityana,Ranavav, Porbandar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia
For the Second Party : Shri Ramsingh Thakor
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/80/2008-IR(M) dated 16.09.2008 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Manager (Mines)/Mine Agent of M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Ranavav in not providing employment to Shri Ali Suleman Ghavda, Ex-workman after 01.10.2006 and whether his termination is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 16.09.2008. Both the parties submitted and exchanged their statement of claim and written statement along with relevant documents. The reference was fixed for evidence of the second party but today on 23.11.2017, both the parties jointly submitted a settlement Ex. 16 stating that the first party has agreed to pay Rs.1278000/- to the workman subject to deduction of taxes. It has also been said that the payment has been made to the workman. The settlement was read over to the parties and the parties verified the settlement of the award.
2. Thus the reference is finally disposed of in terms of the settlement Ex. 16. The settlement Ex. 16 shall be part of the award.
3. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer189 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 67.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स डी.बी.सी. सन्स ;गुजरातद्ध प्राइवेट लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक
विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 531/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-37011/17/2002-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 67.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 531/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. D.B.C. Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd. and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-37011/17/2002-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 531/2004
The Managing Director, M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd., Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai – 400010
…First Party
V/s
Shri N.K. Sharma, S.D.X. – 50, Kutch, Gandhidham (Gujarat) – 370201
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri L.M. Patil
For the Second Party : Shri D.C. Gandhi
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/17/2002-IR(M) dated 10.12.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C's Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on duty after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is justified or legal? If not, what relief the workman is entitled for and since when?"190 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1. The reference dates back to 10.12.2002. After issuing notice to both the parties, neither of the parties appeared, therefore, Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat vide order dated 10.01.2005 dismissed the reference for non-appearance of the parties.
2. Thereafter, the second party workman moved a Misc. Application No. 07/2009 after a period of 2 years for restoration of the reference and the Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat restored the reference to its original no. for adjudication and issued the notice to the first party which was received by the first party on 13.09.2012.
3. The second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 13 on 23.08.2012 alleging that he was appointed as a temporary employee on the post of Dock Assistant by the first party The Managing Director, M/s Darabshaw B. Cursetjee Sons (Bom) Pvt. Ltd., Darabshaw House, Ballard Pier, Mumbai, hereinafter referred to as first party vide order dated 30.04.1985 for a period of 6 months' probation w.e.f. 01.05.1985 with a monthly salary of Rs.450/- and he was made permanent vide order dated 29.03.1986 w.e.f. 01.04.1986 with a total salary of Rs.5500/- in the grade of permanent service. He served his duties with honesty and diligence at first party office as Gandhidham. During his whole service, he was not showed any show-cause notice, memo, rebuke or charge-sheet. On account of his good and honest service, he was giving 3 special increments with a commendation certificate. Suddenly on 21.06.2001, he was transferred Gandhidham Gujarat to Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. He apprised the first party by way of serving a letter regarding his financial, social conditions and also problems of minor child and wife's illness being suffering with kidney ailment but the first party did not consider his case of change of transfer, therefore, he booked a railway ticket on 08.08.2001 to be present at Kakinada. After reaching Kakinada, he was not permitted to join, so he informed the Labour Commissioner at Kakinada regarding this but those officers did not take cognizance into the matter. He was not subjected to any departmental inquiry and suddenly his services were terminated for not joining at the transfer place. While terminating his services, he was not given any show-cause notice, retrenchment compensation. Thus the action was violative of the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the I.D. Act. Thus he has prayed for declaring the termination order as illegal, reinstatement of service along with service benefits with legal expenses of Rs. 10000/-.
4. The first party in his written statement Ex. 15 filed on 18.10.2012 admitted the service appointment of second party workman on probation, thereafter, as a permanent employee but further submitted that the first party did not terminate the services of the second party workman and as per the transfer orders issued by the first party; he was transferred from Gandhidham to Kakinada. He reported to duty at transferred place and thereafter, all of a sudden, he refused to work at the transferred place and started to send representations mentioning seek reports and his wife's ailment. He has also submitted that this tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference on the ground that the initial appointment letter as a probationer as well as a permanent employee issued to the workman clearly indicated that transfer will be the condition of his service and after making his transfer to Kakinada, the workman admitted that he resume duty at Kakinada and thereafter, he stopped working there. Thus the jurisdiction lies in the Central Government Industrial Tribunal situated in Andhra Pradesh. It has been further submitted that the entire reference is misconceived, legally not tenable as transferring a workman/employee which was a service condition in the appointment letter, cannot also be entertained as an Industrial Dispute.
5. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
i. Whether the action of the management of M/s D.B.C's Sons (Guj.) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai not to allow on duty after transfer either at Kakinada or at Kandla presuming that he was left the service on his own is justified or legal?
ii. To what relief, if any, the workman is entitled for and since when?
6. As both the issues are interconnected, therefore both these issues are discussed and decided together.
7. Issue no. (i & ii): The burden to prove this issue was lying on the second party workman and the second party workman in his affidavit Ex. 16 filed on 28.11.2013 and in his cross-examination, he has admitted that his date of birth is 17.12.1949 with a matric qualification and also admitted that he was transferred to Kakinada vide order dated 20.06.2001, he reached Kakinada after staying for 10 to 15 days at Gandhidham requesting for cancellation of transfer. He further admitted in his cross-examination that he stayed in Kakinada for a month and came back to Gandhidham. Thereafter, he did not turn up at Kakinada.
8. The first party examined Baltazar Fernandez, Senior Manager, vide affidavit Ex. 19 who reiterated the averments made in the written statement and stated in his cross-examination which is as under:
"I have been working as Senior Manager, Finance and Accounts since last 25 years. I am aware of all the facts relating to this case. The workman N.K. Sharma has been a regular employee of first party. The workman was Dock Assistant in the first party organisation. We used to transfer the workman from one branch to another branch of the organisation. Our office is based at Kandla Port. It is true that since joining the workman191 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 continued his service at Kandla Port Branch of first party organisation. The workman was transferred on 21.06.2001 from Kandla Branch to Kakinada Branch of the first party organisation. He was relieved with immediate effect.
The workman moved a representation for cancellation of his transfer order on the ground that his wife was well and long sick. The representation was annexed with the medical certificate regarding Kidney disease.
The workman despite representation for cancellation of transfer, joined at Kakinada on 08.08.2001. But we did not permit him to join and also did not initiate any disciplinary proceeding against the workman for not joining with in time provided in the transfer order.
No action was taken against the officer who has not permitted the workman to join at Kakinada despite the fact that the workman's wife was suffering with Kidney disease.
It is true that the workman moved number of complaints to Collector of the District and other higher authorities regarding denying him to join at Kakinada. It is true that the workman is stayed at Kakinada for 15 days but even then he was not permitted to join. No termination order was served on him. No notice or notice pay was given to the workman. The superannuation age in the first party organisation is 58 years, till date no service or legal dues are paid to him."
9. From the evidence of both the parties, it can be concluded that the service of the workman was transferrable and he was transferred as per the terms and condition of the service despite the admitted fact that his wife was suffering with renal ailment. Workman joined at Kakinada, therefore, it cannot be disputed that the jurisdiction in this dispute was lying in the State of Andhra Pradesh, therefore, in the Central Government Industrial Tribunal situated in the state of Andhra Pradesh. But the case of the workman appears to be inhumane on the part of the first party that despite the renal ailment of the workman's wife, he was deliberately transferred to Kakinada which is against the labour practice and inhumane. Thus transferred made out of a vengeance can be said to be an Industrial Dispute which existed at Gandhidham in Gujarat. It is also noteworthy that the first party witness has admitted that no legal dues or benefits have been paid to him.
10. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid discussions, it can be said that the jurisdiction lies at both the places that is Gandhidham as well as Kakinada because the workman was transferred out of vengeance without considering the real ailment of the workman's wife but as admitted by the workman that he was born on 17.12.1949, therefore, passed the superannuation age, therefore, he cannot be ordered to be reinstated and he can also not be paid arrears of wages for the period of absence on the principle of 'no work no pay'.
11. Thus both the issues (i & ii) are decided with a direction that the second party workman shall be paid a lump- sum of Rs. 40000/- as compensation along with Rs. 10000/- as legal expenses.
12. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 68.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स ओ.एन. जी.सी. लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 734/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/67/2001-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 68.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 734/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/67/2001-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
192 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 28th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 734/2004
1. The Group General Manager (Project), ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar (Gujarat) – 393010
2. M/s Yasodeep and Company,
F-32, Raviraj Complex, Nr. Valia Chokdi, Bharuch (Gujarat) – 393010 …First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, ONG Mazdoor Sangh C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Nr. Asian Paint Chokdi, GIDC, Ankleshwar (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu
For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/67/2001-IR(M) dated 04.07.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of Shri Raj Yogendra Sinh Balwant Sinh & 13 others as permanent and direct employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the service as contractual workmen and all other benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd., is legal, proper and justified? If so, to what relief the concerned workmen are entitled to and from which date and what other directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 04.07.2001. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 15.02.2002 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 14 on 05.05.2002. The workmen namely Mohd Rafik Hussain Shaikh and Mohd Rafik Bdul Karim Shaikh vide Ex. 53 on 11.01.2016 and the workmen namely Raj Yogendrasinh Balvantsinh, Patel Narsangbhai Bhikhabhai, Chasatiya Sandipsinh Prabhatsinh and Vasava Naginbhai Parsottambhai vide Ex. 55 on 30.06.2016, requested to withdraw from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence. Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the union are not willing to prosecute the reference.
2. Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the demand of the union to absorb/regularize the services of remaining 8 workmen as permanent and direct employee of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar from the date of their entry in the service as contractual workmen and all other benefits as enjoyed as the regular employees of the ONGC Ltd., is illegal, improper and unjustified.''
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 69.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ओ.एन. जी.सी. लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार193 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 767/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-30011/57/2001-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 69.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 767/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. O.N.G.C. Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-30011/57/2001-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 28th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 767/2004
The Group General Manager (Project), ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar(Gujarat) – 393010
…First Party
V/s
The President, All Gujarat State Kamdar Union, Khadki Faliya, At Vav, Post Kadodara, Taluka Vagra, Bharuch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri C.S. Naidu
For the Second Party : Shri Amrish Patel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-30011/57/2001-IR(M) dated 13.11.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering the demand of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and 30 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 13.11.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 21.04.2004 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 17 on 03.10.2017. The workmen namely Rameshbhai Bheemsang Patel, Chatrsangbhai Ranchodbhai Patel, Fuljibhai Bahecharbhai Limbachia, Ganpat MahijiJadav, Ashokbhai N. Solanki and Gohil Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai, vide Ex. 9 on 28.03.2016, the workman Suleman Umerji Patel vide Ex. 12 on 21.06.2016 and the workman Ismail Vali Patel vide Ex. 15 on 29.06.2016, requested to withdraw from the reference by deleting their names. The said applications were allowed. Since then the remaining workmen or the union has been absent and have not been leading evidence. Thus it appears that the remaining workmen or the union are not willing to prosecute the reference.
194 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]2. Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of ONGC Ltd., Ankleshwar Project, Ankleshwar in not considering the demand of Shri Gohil Bharatbhai G. and remaining 22 other workmen for absorption and regularisation is justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 70.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स गुजरात अम्बुजा सीमेंट लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय
सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1004/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29012/51/1994-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 70.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1004/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Limited and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29012/51/1994-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 21st November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1004/2004
The Dy. Manager (Personnel), M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd., Ambujanagar, P.O. Kodinar, Amreli – 362720
…First Party
V/s
Shri B.N. Khan, C/o Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Gayatri Rajaputpara Main Road, Lodhwad Police Station, Rajkot (Gujarat) -360001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri A.S. Parikh
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29012/51/94- IR(M) dated 27.03.1996 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri B.N. Khan is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"195 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 1. The reference dates back to 27.03.1996. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 15.02.1997 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 5 on 08.12.1997. Since then the second party has not leading evidence, therefore, on 21.03.2011, fresh notice was issued to both the parties to lead evidence but the second party neither appeared nor lead his evidence, however, the advocate of the second party appeared and submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 13 on 27.01.2012.
2. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute and pursue the matter.
3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: ''the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. in terminating the services of Shri B.N. Khan is justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 1 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 71.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मेसर्स गुजरात सीध्ी सीमेन्ट लिमिटेड एवं अन्य के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में
केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण एवं श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 1134/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 19.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-29011/9/1998-आईआर ;एमद्ध]
डी. के. हिमांशु, अवर सचिव
New Delhi, the 1st January, 2018
S.O. 71.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1134/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd. and others and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 19.12.2017.
[No. L-29011/9/1998-IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 30th November, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 1134/2004
1. The Director (Works),
Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd., Veraval Kodinar Highway, Sidheegram, Veraval, Junagadh (Gujarat) – 362276
2. M/s Kavita Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,
Deevanodi Naharmagra,Udaipur
3. M/s A.M. Enterprises,
C/o Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd., Sidhi Gram, Junagadh (Gujarat) …First Party196 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
V/s
The Secretary, Shree Junagadh Jilla Mazdoor Sangh, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Office No. 6/7, 2nd Floor, Veraval (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri P.S. Gogia For the Second Party : Shri L.M. Patil
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-29011/9/98- IR(M) dated 29.06.1998 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s Gujarat Sidhee Cements Ltd., and Contractor M/s A.M. Enterprises in terminating the service of 104 employees working in packing plant w.e.f. 12.12.1997 is justified? If not, to what relief these workmen are entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 29.06.1998. Both the parties submitted their statement of claim and written statement as the case may be. But on 30.11.2017, both the parties submitted the settlement Ex. 23 for withdrawing the reference unconditionally.
2. Thus the reference is disposed of as withdrawn.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली,,,, 3 जनवरी,,,, 2018
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 72727272....————के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार, कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 34) की धारा 91-क के साथ पठित धारा 88 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 'ए एत)ारा िभलाई स्टील प्लांट, सेल के कारखानों/स्थापनाओं के नियमित कर्मचारियों को इस अधिनियम के प्रवर्तन से छू ट प्रदान करती है। यह छू ट, यह अधिसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से एक वर्ष की अवधि के लिए लागू रहेगी ।
2. उक्त छू ट निम्नलिखित शत< के अधीन है; अर्थात्:-
(1) पूव>क्त स्थापना जिसमें कर्मचारी नियोजित हैं, एक रजिस्टर रखेगी, जिसमें छू ट प्राप्त कर्मचारियों के नाम और पदनाम दिखाये जायेंगे;
(2) इस छू ट के होते 'ए भी, कर्मचारी उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन ऐसी प्रसुविधाएं प्राप्त करते रहेंगे जिनको पाने के लिए वे इस अधिसूचना द्वारा दी गई छू ट के प्रवृत्त होने की तारीख से पूर्व संदत्त अंशदानों के आधार पर हकदार हो जाते हैं;
(3) छू ट प्राप्त अवधि के लिए, यदि कोई अभिदाय पहले ही किए जा चुके हों, तो वे वापस नहH किए जाएंगे;
(4) उक्त कारखाने/स्थापना का नियोजक उस अवधि की बाबत जिसके दौरान उस कारखाने/स्थापना पर उक्त अधिनियम (जिसे इसमें इसके पJात् उक्त अवधि कहा गया है) प्रवतर्मान था ऐसी विवरणियां, ऐसे प्रारूप में और ऐसी विशिष्टियों सिहत देगा जो कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 के अधीन उसे उक्त अवधि की बाबत देनी अपेक्षित होती थH;
(5) निगम द्वारा उक्त कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा अधिनियम की धारा 45 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन नियुक्त किया गया कोई निरीक्षक या निगम का इस निमित्त प्राधिकृ त कोई अन्य पदधारी;
(i) धारा 44 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, उक्त अवधि की बाबत दी गई किसी विवरण की विशिष्टयों को सत्यापित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ; अथवा
(ii) यह अभिनिJित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा (साधारण) िविनयम, 1950 द्वारा यथाअपेक्षित रजिस्टर और अभिलेख उक्त अवधि के लिए रखे गये थे या नहH; या
(iii) यह अभिनिJित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि कर्मचारी, नियोजक द्वारा दिये गए उन फायदों को, जिसके फलस्वरूप इस अिधसूचना के अधीन छू ट दी जा रही है, नकद में और वस्तु रूप में पाने का हकदार बना 'आ है या नहH; या197 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 (iv) यह अभिनिJित करने के प्रयोजनार्थ कि उस अवधि के दौरान, जब उक्त कारखाने के संबंध में अधिनियम के उपबंध प्रवृत्त थे, ऐसे किन्हH उपबंधों का अनुपालन किया गया था या नहH, निम्नलिखित कार्य करने के लिए सशक्त होगा:-
(क) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक से अपेक्षा करना कि वह उसे ऐसी जानकारी दे जिसे उपरोक्त निरीक्षक या अन्य
पदधारी आवश्यक समझता है ; अथवा
(ख) ऐसे प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक के अधिभोगाधीन, किसी कारखाने, स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में किसी भी उचित समय पर प्रवेश करना और उसके प्रभारी से यह अपेक्षा करना कि वह Uक्तियों के िनयोजन और मजदूरी के संदाय से संबंिधत ऐसे लेखा, बहियां और अन्य दस्तावेज, ऐसे निरीक्षक या अन्य
पदधारी के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करें और उनकी परीक्षा करने दें या ऐसी जानकारी दें जिसे वे आवश्यक समझते हैं;
या
(ग) प्रधान या आसन्न नियोजक की, उसके अभिकर्ता या सेवक की, या ऐसे किसी Uक्ति को, जो ऐसे कारखाने, स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में पाया जाए, यह विVास करने का युक्तियुक्त कारण है कि वह कर्मचारी है, परीक्षा करना; या
(घ) ऐसे कारखाने, स्थापना, कार्यालय या अन्य परिसर में रखे गए किसी रजिस्टर, लेखा, बही या अन्य दस्तावेज की नकल तैयार करना या उWरण लेना;
(ङ) यथानिर्धारित अन्य शक्तियों का प्रयोग करना ।
(6) विनिवेश/निगमीकरण के मामले में, प्रदत्त छू ट स्वत: रद्द हो जाएगी और तब नए प्रतिष्ठान को छू ट हेतु समुचित सरकार की अनुमति लेनी होगी।
[सं. एस-38014/07/2013-एस.एस.-I]
एस. के . सिंह, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 72.—In exercise of the power conferred by Section 88 read with Section 91-A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) the Central Government hereby exempts the regular employees/trainees of factories/establishments of Bhilai Steel Plant of SAIL from the operation of the said Act. The exemption shall be effective for a period of one year from the date of issue of notification.
2. The above exemption is subject to the following conditions namely:-
(1) The aforesaid establishments wherein the employees are employed shall maintain a register showing the name and designations of the exempted employees';
(2) Notwithstanding this exemption, the employees shall continue to receive such benefits under the said Act to which they might have become entitled to on the basis of the contributions paid prior to the date from which exemption granted by this notification operates;
(3) The contributions for the exempted period, if already paid, shall not be refundable;
(4) The employer of the said factory/establishment shall submit in respect of the period during which that factory was subject to the operation of the said Act (hereinafter referred as the said period), such returns in such forms and containing such particulars as were due from it in respect of the said period under the Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950;
(5) Any Social Security Officer appointed by the Corporation under Sub-Section (1) of Section 45 of the said ESI Act or other official of the Corporation authorized in this behalf by it, shall, for the purpose of :-
(i) Verifying the particulars contained in any returned submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44 for the said period; or
(ii) Ascertaining whether registers and records were maintained as required by the Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 for the said period; or
(iii) Ascertaining whether the employees continue to be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in cash and kind being benefits in consideration of which exemption is being granted under this notification; or198 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (iv) Ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the Act had been complied with during the period when such provisions were in force in relation to the said factory to be empowered to:
(a) require the principal or immediate employer to him such information as he may consider necessary for the purpose of this Act; or
(b) at any reasonable time enter any factory, establishment, office or other premises occupied by such principal or immediate employer at any reasonable time and require any person found in charge thereof to produce to such inspector or other official and allow him to examine accounts, books and other documents relating to the employment of personal and payment of wages or to furnish to him such information as he may consider necessary; or
(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his agent or servant, or any person found in such factory, establishment, office or other premises or any person whom the said inspector or other official has reasonable cause to believe to have been an employee ; or
(d) make copies of or take extracts from any register, account book or other document maintained in such factory, establishment, office or other premises,
(e) exercise such other powers as may be prescribed.
(6) In case of disinvestment/corporatization, the exemption granted shall become automatically cancelled and then the new entity will have to approach the appropriate Government for exemption.
[No. S-38014/07/2013-SS-I]
S. K. SINGH, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 73.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कांडला पोर्ट ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 121/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-37011/13/2008-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 73.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 121/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/13/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 121/2010
The Chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party199 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
V/s
The General Secretary, Transport & Dock Workers Union, Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/13/2008-IR(B-II) dated 25.03.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior Engineer Civil Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified? What relief the concerned workmen is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 25.03.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
2. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the observation as under: ''the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in not providing higher grade salary to Shri Sajan Karvadira, Parmar Sandeep, Smt. Sunita Punjwani, Junior Engineer Civil Gr. I w.e.f. 01.08.2007 to 09.09.2007 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 74.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कांडला पोर्ट
ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 128/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-37011/6/2009-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 74.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 128/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/6/2009-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th December, 2017200 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Reference: (CGITA) No. 128/2010
The Chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Transport & Dock Workers Union, Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/6/2009- IR(B-II) dated 31.12.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri Hadiya Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified? What relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 31.12.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately 9 years old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the statement of claim has not been filed.
2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the observation as under: "the action of the chairman, Kandla Port Trust, Kandla, Gandhidham in not regularizing Shri Hadiya Bhupendra Jetha as regular Mistry against the vacant post is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 75.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कांडला पोर्ट
ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 194/2013द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-37011/13/2013-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 75.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 194/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/13/2013-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer201 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 194/2013
The Secretary, Kandla Port Trust, Administrative Office, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Transport & Dock Workers Union, Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/13/2013-IR(B-II) dated 19.11.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in terminating the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified? What relief these 35 workman are entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 19.11.2013.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is more than 4 years old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the statement of claim has not been filed.
2. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
3. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the observation as under:"the action of the management of M/s Golden Horn Containers Service, Gandhidham in terminating the services of 35 workmen without due process is justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 76.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार यूनाइटेड बैंक
ऑपफ इंडिया के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 344/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12011/128/2000-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी202 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 76.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 344/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of United Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12011/128/2000-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 344/2004
The Chief Regional Manager, United Bank of India, Western Region, 5th Floor, 25, sir Pheroz Shah Mehta Road, Mumbai – 400001
…First Party
V/s
The Joint Secretary, United Bank of India Sramik Karmachari Samity, C/o UBI, Manekchawk Branch, Manekchawk, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia For the Second Party : Shri B.M. Joshi
MODIFIED AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12011/128/2000- IR(B-II) dated 29.09.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H. Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is legal and justified? If not then to what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 29.09.2000. The second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 4 on 20.11.2000 along with number of documents and Solicitor Firm K.V. Gadhia Associates submitted the vakalatpatra Ex. 8 on 19.02.2011 but did not prefer to submit the written statement. Since the submission of vakalatpatra Ex. 8 by the first party, the second party union failed to appear in person to lead his evidence. The advocate of the second party stated in the court on 23.08.2017 that he tried to contact his client by writing a letter but he has not responded. It is also noteworthy that on 06.02.2017, a notice was issued to the second party union to appear and lead evidence on 21.03.2017 but on 21.03.2017 and thereafter on 11.05.2017, 07.06.2017 and 23.08.2017, the second party union did not appear. Thus in the light of the statement of the advocate and non-appearance of the second party union on aforesaid dates, indicates that the second party union is not willing to prosecute the case.
2. Thus the reference in the absence of the evidence of the second party, is finally disposed of with the observation as under: "the action of the management of United Bank of India in denying pensionary benefits to Shri B.H. Chaudhary employed as permanent part-time Sweeper by rejecting his option for pension dated 29.09.1994 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer203 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 77.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार बैंक ऑपफ
इंडिया के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 60/2005द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/41/2005-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 77.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2005) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/41/2005-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 60/2005
The Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Ahmedabad Zone, Bhadra, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Bank of India Staff Co-op. Housing Society, No. 2, Near H.L. Commerce College, Opp. Choice Restaurant Gali, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri D.C. Gandhi
For the Second Party : Shri Hemal K. Acharya
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-12012/41/2005-IR(B-II) dated 20.07.2005 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri D.M. Baxi from the post of Cashier from its Relief Road Branch, Ahmedabad by imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement is legal and justified? If not to what relief is the workman is entitled to and what extent?"
1. The reference dates back to 20.07.2005.The second party workman in his statement of claim Ex. 4 has alleged that he was appointed as Cash-cum-Accounts Clerk by the first party The Zonal Manager,Bank of India, Ahmedabad204 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Zone, Bhadra, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as first party on 15.12.1972. He had been working in various branches of the first party with a record of satisfactory work and conduct and later on, he was promoted as Cashier and Head Cashier in the category of C and E respectively. He has further alleged that on 31.05.2000, while he was working as Head Cashier category E at Relief Road Branch of Ahmedabad, the Sepoy attached to the cash department of the branch came late, therefore, cash operation of the bank could not commence in time and he himself managed the cash from the cash safety to the various co-cashiers for the commencement of the work. But the manager of the branch desired that he should hand over the charge of the cash to another cashier which he refused to do so unless the procedure as required by manual of instructions is followed. Disregarding the said laid down procedure, the manager insisted to his aforesaid decision. Consequently, the workman lost his control and resultantly he misbehaved with the branch manager. He has further alleged that the branch manager reported the said incidence in a strict manner to the competent authority, therefore, he was put under suspension on 01.06.2000 and a charge-sheet dated 20.07.2000 was served on him, inter alia with following charges:
i. Reporting late for duties on 31.05.2000, leaving the cash cabin endangering the safety and security of cash, refusing to discharge the duties allotted and halting the functioning of the branch affecting customer service;
ii. Refusing to handover charge of the cash and throwing away the keys;
iii. Abusing the manager using filthy language and shouting at him at the top of the voice, insulting him and challenging his authority and exhibiting riotous disorderly and indecent behaviour in the branch premises;
iv. Assaulting the manager and creating bas scene/nuisance in the branch premises.
He has further alleged that the charge-sheet is itself a conspiracy. He is a member of minority union; therefore, there was no one to represent him in the department enquiry. He has further alleged that he went under depression and has undergone a treatment of a psychiatrist. He was not given proper opportunity to defend himself as being conducted in a flagrant violation of the principles of natural justice because he submitted his defence on 23.10.2000 and the enquiry office submitted the report on 24.10.2000. The deputy chief general manager of the first party issued a show cause notice on the same day with a pre-determined mind to terminate his services. The workman submitted his reply on 27.10.2000 w.r.t. the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement and the workman raised no. of issues in the personal hearing but to no result and he was ordered to be compulsory retirement.
2. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 11 denying all the allegations made in the statement of claim regarding mala-fide and flagrant violation of principles of natural justice in conducting the departmental enquiry and proposed punishment. The first party has submitted no. of documents regarding department enquiry.
3. The second party workman challenged the legality of the enquiry and submitted his affidavit Ex. 10 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim but in his cross-examination, he has stated that the department enquiry was concluded on 18.10.2002 but he has not said anything which may create doubt regarding the enquiry.
4. Later the record reveals that the workman has expired on 03.03.2014, vide application Ex. 13, his legal heirs is substituted but he did not pursue the case. Since then, they have not been appearing. The charges levelled in the charge- sheet are serious one and the punishment of compulsory retirement was imposed and I do not find any illegality in the department enquiry and the punishment imposed. It is also noteworthy that the compulsory retirement does not deprive the workman or his family from the gratuity, provident fund and pension. Therefore, no interference is required.
5. The award is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 78.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कांडला पोर्ट
ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 119/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-37011/9/2008-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी205 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 78.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 119/2010) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Kandla Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-37011/9/2008-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 07th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 119/2010
The Chairman, Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Transport & Dock Workers Union, Kandla, 21, Yogesh Building, Plot No. 586, 12-C, Gandhidham, Kutch (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri K.V. Gadhia
For the Second Party : None
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-37011/9/2008- IR(B-II) dated 10.02.2009 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 10.02.2009.Despite service of notice to both the party, the second party does not prefer to submit the statement of claim despite giving dozen of opportunities. The reference is approximately9 years old and the first party filed the vakalatpatra of his advocate. The second party advocate failed to explain as to why the statement of claim has not been filed. Thus it appears that the second party is not willing to prosecute the reference.
2. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the statement of claim of the second party with the observation as under:"the action of the management of Kandla Port Trust, P.O. Box No. 50, Gandhidham, Kutch in posting of Dresser in place of First Aider after retirement of Shri Shobnath Tiwari, First Aider, is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 79.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार विजया बैंक
के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक206 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, अहमदाबाद ;गुजरातद्ध के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 377/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12011/241/2000-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 79.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 377/2004) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Vijaya Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12011/241/2000-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 08th December, 2017
Reference: (CGITA) No. 377/2004
The Branch Manager, Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Kamdhenu Complex, Near Polytechnic, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…First Party
V/s
The General Secretary, Vijaya Bank Workers Organisation, C/o Vijaya Bank, Navarangpura Branch, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Second Party
For the First Party : Shri Sanjay Kurian For the Second Party : Shri K.R. Mishra
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L- 12011/241/2000-IR(B-II) dated 29.01.2001 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23 others w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, then to what relief the concerned employees are entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 29.01.2001.The second party submitted the statement of claim on 17.09.2004 enclosed with the list of workmen along with application Ex. 10 for staying the recruitment process likely to be followed by the management violating the due process of law. The then Presiding Office vide order Ex. 17 dated 14.06.2011 stayed the recruitment process as prayed by the second party union/workmen.
2. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 26 on 18.11.2011. Thereafter, the second party submitted the affidavits Ex. 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of the workmen Manojkumar Deepaji Mahabhar, Govind Mangalsinh Devda, Amit207 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 Ambalal Raval, Shailesh Bhagchandra Bhrambhatt and Chetan Bhikhabhai Solanki respectively. None of the witness was cross-examined by the first party despite giving number of opportunities. Thereafter, the second party advocate moved an application Ex. 33 on 21.01.2013 for closing the right of first party to cross-examine the aforesaid witnesses. Since then, the second party and his witnesses have been absent and have not been appearing despite giving number of opportunities. Today on 08.12.2017, the advocate for the second party union Shri K.R. Mishra orally stated that the matter has been settled between the parties and the second party union and its workmen have not been in his contact, therefore, the second party has not been appearing. The advocate for the first party is present for cross-examining the aforesaid second party witness.
3. Thus it appears that second party union or the workmen are not willing to prosecute the case.
4. Thus the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party union/workmen with the observation as under: ''the action of the management of Vijaya Bank, Regional Office, Ahmedabad in terminating/discontinuing the services of temporary/casual employees Shri Vithalbhai Veljibhai Leeva and 23 others w.e.f. 15.11.1995 without complying the provisions of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is legal and justified."
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 80.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पारादीप पोर्ट
ट्रस्ट के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, भुवनेश्वर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 15/2017द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-38011/03/2016-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 80.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 15/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Bhubaneswar as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Paradip Port Trust and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-38011/03/2016-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, BHUBANESWAR
Present:
Shri B.C. Rath, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-cum-Labour Court, Bhubaneswar
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 15/2017
No. L-38011/03/2016-IR(B-II), dated 13.02.2017
Date of Passing Order – 15th November, 2017
Between:
The Chairman, Paradip Port Trust, Paradip, Dist. Jagatsinghpur, Odisha
…1st Party-Management
(And)
The General Secretary, Paradip Port Workers Union, Badapadia, Paradip Port, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha
…2nd Party-Union208 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appearances:
None … For the 1st Party-Management None … For the 2nd Party-Union
ORDER
Case taken up. Parties are absent. The 2nd Party-Union has not filed any statement of claim despite notice through regd. post. As such, it seems that the 2nd party-Union is not interested in prosecuting its case. However the dispute cannot be adjudicated upon for want of pleadings on behalf of the parties. As such there is no alternative except to return the reference to the Government for necessary action at its end.
2. Accordingly the reference is returned to the Government unanswered for necessary action at its end.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
B. C. RATH, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 81.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार कोरपोरेशन
बैंक के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 70/2017द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/09/2017-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 81.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No. 1, Delhi as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Corpoaration Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/09/2017-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT NO.1, ROOM NO. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX,
SECTOR-10 DWARKA, DELHI-110075
ID. No. 70/2017
Shri Nirmal Prasad, C/o Corporation Bank, Safai Karmachari Sangh, Office: 6054, Gali Mandir Satya Naryana, Nabi Karim, Paharganj New Delhi-110055
…Claimant
Versus
1. General Manager,
Personnel Administrative Division, Industrial Relations Wing, Head Office, Mangala Devi Temple Road, Mangalore-575001
2. The General Manager,
TAD, Corporation Bank, Deshbhandu, Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005
…Managements209 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
AWARD
In the present case, a reference was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.L- 12012/09/2017(IR(B-II)) dated 20.03.2017 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Act, for adjudication of a dispute, terms of which are as under:
"Whether the workman Shri Nirmal Prasad, M.No. 1685, Part Time Sweeper is entitled for the difference of salary for the period of suspension from the Management of Corporation Bank after conclusion of proceedings and order by the Appellate Authority? If not, then what relief the workman is entitled to?"
2. In the reference order, the appropriate Government commanded the party/ies raising the dispute to file statement of claim, complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses with this Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the reference order and to forward a copy of such statement of claim to the opposite parties involved in the dispute. Despite directions so given, Claimant opted not to file his claim statement with the Tribunal.
3. On receipt of the above reference, notice was sent to the workman as well as the managements. Neither the postal article sent to the claimant, referred above, was received back nor was it observed by the Tribunal that postal services remained affected during the period, referred above. Therefore, every presumption lies in favour of the fact that the above notice was served upon the claimant. Despite service of the notice, claimant opted to abstain away from the proceedings. No claim statement was filed on his behalf. Thus, it is clear that the claimant is not interested in adjudication of the reference on merits.
4. Since the claimant has neither put in his appearance nor has he led any evidence so as to prove his cause against the management, as such, this Tribunal is left with no choice, except to pass a 'No Dispute/Claim' award. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Date : December 14, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 3 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 82.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धरा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार ओरियन्टल
बैंक ऑपफ कामर्स के प्रबंध्तंत्रा के संब( नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध् में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अध्किरण/श्रम न्यायालय, हैदराबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ सं. 30/2007द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को
03.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/115/2006-आईआर ;बी-IIद्ध]
रवि कुमार, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 3rd January, 2018
S.O. 82.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 30/2007) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 03.01.2018.
[No. L-12012/115/2006-IR (B-II)]
RAVI KUMAR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 27th day of October, 2017
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 30/2007
Between :
Sri T. Rajender Singh, 8-3-228/606/1, Rahmath Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad -45
…Petitioner210 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
The General Manager (HRD), Oriental Bank of Commerce, S.B.U., Ashoka My Home Chambers, 1-8-303, Sardar Patel Road, Secunderabad – 500 003
…Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner : Sri William Burra, Advocate For the Respondent : M/s. K. Raghuram Reddy & M. Subramanya Sastry, Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-12012/115/2006-IR(B-II) dated 5.6.2007 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of some of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No. 30/2007 and issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.
2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:
It is submitted that the Petitioner worked as Runner from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in erstwhile Global Trust Bank and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad. Initially, he worked as Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad. The Petitioner submits that other workmen who worked with him in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce, whereas he was not considered on the grounds of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner's total service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in each year. He studied upto 8th class and also able to read and write, three languages, viz., Telugu, English and Hindi. It is further stated that the Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the Federation, New Delhi on 30.9.2005, wherein it was agreed to absorb the erstwhile runners working through agencies as Peons in subordinate cadre with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption his application was not considered. The details of attendance shows that during the year 2004-2005, the Petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a year. Provisions of Sec.25-F were not observed in terminating the services of the Petitioner. He prayed to direct the Respondent bank for his absorption/reinstatement with back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.
3. Respondents filed their counter with the averments in brief as follows:
There is no employer-employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged as Runner through M/s Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through M/s Global Corporate Services, as admitted by him. It can not be said that the Petitioner was ever a workman as no appointment letter was issued to him by the erstwhile Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of Global Trust Bank with Oriental Bank of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the employee of outsourcing agency who was working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. However, as per the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank, a circular dated 28.10.2005 was issued which provides that only those persons who were working through the outsourcing agencies with erstwhile Global Trust Bank as on the date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for consideration for absorption subject to fulfilling other conditions of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner does not possess the required educational qualification is pass in VIII standard as per the said circular, thus, he was not considered for absorption and he was informed accordingly. Therefore, the present reference is not maintainable in law and liable to be rejected.
4. The Petitioner has examined himself as WW1 and has also exhibited the photostat copies of four documents which are marked as i.e., Ex.W1 to W4. The Respondent has examined Sri J.P. Sarma, the Chief Manager of the Bank as MW1 and Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar, the Senior Manager of the Bank as MW2 on their behalf and also relied on eight documents which have been marked as exhibits Ex.M1 to M8.
211 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 19395. I have already heard from both the sides in this matter.
6. In view of the pleadings of both the sides, the points for consideration are as follows:
I. Whether the action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce by regularising the services of some of the workmen of erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal and/or justified?
II. If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?
7. The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005 in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and later in the Oriental Bank of Commerce at Secunderabad. Initially, the Petitioner worked as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter worked through the same agency from 15.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent (Oriental Bank of Commerce, Secunderabad). In all the Petitioner has rendered more than 8 years of service, out of which, six years through the aforesaid agencies and about more than two years directly under the Respondent during the period from 22.8.2002 to 30.11.2005. Finally on 30.11.2005 his services were terminated. It is contended that the Petitioner worked as a Runner and he used to work from 1997 to 2005 not less than 300 days in any calendar year. The duties of a Runner as admitted by the management witnesses are – carrying instruments like cheques, DDs from branches to service centre, and in case runners are posted in the administrative offices, they used to take care distribution of dispatch within the office/Department and related filing works. It is further contended that the nature of work of Runner as admitted by the management witness is perennial in nature. The engagement of contract labour in such work through outsourcing agency is only "Sham" contract. Therefore, the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly employed by the Respondent bank during the period from 1.2.1997 to 30.11.2005. Thus, the services rendered by the Petitioner through outsourcing agencies firstly with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and secondly with the Oriental Bank of Commerce is a "sham" contract. Hence, the Petitioner is deemed to be an employee directly by the bank and hence in this case master and servant relationship or employer and employee relationship is clearly established. It is also contended that the other workmen who worked with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce whereas, the Petitioner was not considered on the ground of eligibility criteria. The Petitioner's total service was more than 8 years and he has worked for more than 300 days in each year. He has studied upto class VIII and also able to read and write three languages, i.e., Telugu, English and Hindi. It is also contended that the Respondent management has entered into an agreement with the representatives of the Federation, New Delhi on 30.9.2005 wherein it had been agreed to absorb, the erstwhile Global Trust Bank Runners working through agencies as Peons in subordinate cadres with minimum educational qualification of 8th standard. Even though the Petitioner has fulfilled all the conditions laid down for absorption, his application was not considered. The details of attendance shows that during the year 2004-2005 the Petitioner has worked for more than 240 days in a year. The Respondent bank while terminating the Petitioner from service has not followed the provisions of Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner is required to be absorbed as a permanent employee in the Respondent bank with back wages, continuity of service and other attendant benefits.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent contended that there is no employer and employee relationship between the Respondent bank and the Petitioner as he was engaged as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services for some time and thereafter through Global Corporate Services as admitted by him. As per his contention, no appointment letter was issued to the Petitioner either by the erstwhile Global Trust Bank or by the Oriental Bank of Commerce. After merger of Global Trust Bank with the Oriental Bank of Commerce the Respondent bank was under no obligation to absorb the employees of outsourcing agencies, who were working on their behalf for Global Trust Bank. He further contended that as per the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank on 20.8.2005. One circular was issued by the Respondent, wherein it had been provided that only those persons who were working through outsourcing agencies with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank as on the date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 will be eligible for absorption subject to fulfilling other conditions of eligibility criteria. As admitted by the Petitioner he does not possess the required educational qualification as required in the guidelines. As per his contention the documents relied on by the Petitioner vide Ex.W2 clearly states that "only those Runners/office boys who were working in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank branches/offices as on the date of amalgamation i.e., 14.8.2004 would be eligible to apply, minimum qualification required should be 8th standard pass. Admittedly, the Petitioner had applied for the post of Runner but Ex.W1, the Photostat copy of the form of transfer certificate goes to show that at the time of leaving the school, the Petitioner was studying in Class VIII which clearly indicates that he has not passed VIII standard which shows that on the own admission of the Petitioner he has not passed VIII standard and has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner in the Respondent's bank at the time of its amalgamation, and for this reason the case of the Petitioner was not considered, and he had been informed accordingly. Further more, the Petitioner has not impleaded the contractors/outsourcing agencies as parties in this case under whom he was working and in absence of the contractors the case of as such the Petitioner is liable to212 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] be dismissed and the Petitioner is not entitled to get any relief. Therefore, the claim of the Petitioner is not tenable in the eye of Law, and is liable to be rejected.
9. On consideration of the rival contentions of the Advocates of both the sides as well as the evidence adduced by the parties and the materials available on record it is seen that no documents have been filed from the side of the Petitioner to show that, which workmen worked with the Petitioner in similar capacity in the erstwhile Global Trust Bank are absorbed in the Oriental Bank of Commerce. Admittedly, the Petitioner was not considered to be absorbed in the Respondent's bank on the ground of eligibility criteria. Pursuant to the guidelines, vide Ex.W2, the Petitioner has applied for absorption as Runner, wherein minimum criteria to be eligible for the post was passing of class VIII. Ex.W1 clearly indicates that the Petitioner has not passed class VIII at the time of filing of the application. When he has not fulfilled the required criteria to be absorbed as a Runner, his case was not considered and the Respondent bank has not regularized his services as Runner and the same has been intimated to the Petitioner. in such a circumstances, it can safely be stated that the action of the Respondent bank in not regularising the service of Sri T. Rajendar Singh, Ex.Runner is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point No.II: Admittedly, the Petitioner was working as a Runner through M/s. Agile and Suraksha Security Services from 1.2.1997 to 31.1.2001 and through Global Corporate Services from 1.2.2001 to 14.8.2004 and thereafter worked through the same agency from 14.8.2004 onwards for the Respondent. The Respondent has utilized the services of the Petitioner for a long period. MW2 in his cross examination has clearly admitted that the contract agreement entered between the erstwhile Global Trust Bank and Global Corporate Services, Ex.M5 came into force on 22.8.2000 and expired after completion of 24 months for a period of two years which was directly with the erstwhile Global Trust Bank. Therefore the service rendered by the Petitioner though through outsourcing agency, but it was taken directly under the Respondent from 22.8.2000 to 14.8.2004, similarly when the Global Trust Bank was amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, from 14.8.2004 onwards, the Petitioner rendered service directly under the Oriental Bank of Commerce, and he was terminated after lapse of one year of the amalgamation, i.e., from 14.8.2004 to 30.11.2005, which clearly shows that the Petitioner has rendered his services to Respondent during the aforesaid period. It is also not known how the Respondent was utilizing the services of the Petitioner from 22.8.2002 onwards when admittedly there was no agreement between the Respondent and the outsourcing agencies. This shows that the Respondent was well aware of the fact that the Petitioner is working under its establishment as a workman and the Respondent has utilized the services of the Petitioner like an employee of the establishment and as such, employer and employee relationship was existing between the Respondent and the Petitioner, and the plea of the Respondent that they were utilizing the services of the Petitioner only through outsourcing agency i.e., the contractors, is not acceptable. Moreover, the Respondent has failed either to produce any document or to show any reason in which way he has engaged the Petitioner in his establishment after its amalgamation. Further more, the Respondent has admitted that bank has considered the application of the Petitioner for his absorption as Runner but as the Petitioner failed to fulfill the required criteria for the post of Runner. It was not considered. This shows that when the case of the Petitioner was not considered and the Respondent has failed to absorb him in the bank, he terminated the services of the Petitioner. But Before termination of the Petitioner from service the Respondent bank had to see the plight of the workman, when workman had worked for more than 8 years under its establishment through outsourcing agency as well as directly and was also acquainted with the work culture. In such a circumstances the Respondent should have engaged the workman atleast as a daily rated labour. But the Respondent has not considered the case of the workman. More over, while terminating the services of the Petitioner the Respondent has to comply with the provisions required under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but in this case, it has not been done. Admittedly, the Petitioner has worked for more than 8 years under the Respondent, through different agencies continuously as a Runner and also out of which, for one year and four months directly under the Respondent and as such, the Petitioner comes under the definition of a workman under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When the Petitioner was retrenched from service the Respondent was expected to retrench the workman as per the provisions contained under Sec.25.F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. But in this case the Respondent has not complied it. Therefore, the termination/retrenchment of the Petitioner workman is in violation of Sec.25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Since the Respondent has not shown the reasons for the retrenchment of the workman and even the workman is not in receipt of any notice of termination or notice or notice pay/one month pay and if the workman was not paid any retrenchment compensation of 15 days average pay for every completed year of service; the retrenchment or termination of the Petitioner workman is illegal, and the Petitioner is entitled to get benefit under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.
11. In view of the findings given under Point Nos. I & II, the Petitioner is entitled to get a chance to work under the Respondent atleast as a daily rated workman and is also entitled to get the terminal benefits as required under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
213 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939Result:
In view of the findings given in Point No.I, the reference is answered as follows:
The action of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce of regularising the services of some of the workmen erstwhile Global Trust Bank and not regularising the services of Shri T. Rajender Singh, Ex-runner is legal and justified. But, in view of the findings given Point No.II, as the workman has not been retrenched by following due procedure of Law, the Respondent should consider the Petitioner for his absorption as a daily rated worker, if he is eligible to work. If the Petitioner is not eligible to work under any rules, the Respondent is at liberty to retrench the Petitioner only by following the procedure laid down under Sec.25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 27th day of October, 2017.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner
Respondent
WW1: Sri T Rajender Singh MW1: Sri J.P. Sarma
MW2: Sri Dr. Vijay Kumar Joseph
Documents marked for the Petitioner
Ex.W1 : Photostat of Copy of school leaving certificate
Ex.W2 : Photostat of circular dated 28.10.2005 issued by the Respondent bank erstwhile Global Trust
Bank
Ex.W3 : Photostat of representation dt.28.7.2004 of WW1
Ex.W4 : Photostat of application dt. 13.8.2004 of WW1
Documents marked for the Respondent
Ex.M1 : Photostat of lr.No.Q&O/CMR/LET/732/2005 dt.30.11.2005
Ex.M2 : Agreement between Globla Trust Bank and M/s Global Corporate Services
Ex.M3 : Attendance register for the period from 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2007
Ex.M4 : Attendance register for the period from January 2005 to January, 2006
Ex.M5 : Agreement dt. 20.3.2002 relating to record keeping services
Ex.M6 : Agreement relating to house keeping etc..
Ex.M7 : Photostat copy of payment particulars of the Petitioner to the Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd.,
for the month of October 2005
Ex.M8 : Photostat copy of bank statement of account of M/s Global Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd for the
period from 31.3.2000 to 6.1.2006
नई दिल्ली, 8 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 83.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स मिड्ढा इंटरप्राइजेज के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण-सह-श्रम न्यायालय, जयपुर के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 23/2017द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 27.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-22012/15/2017-आईआर ;सीएम-IIद्ध]
राजेन्द्र सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी214 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 8th January, 2018
S.O. 83.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2017) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Middha Enterprises and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 27.12.2017.
[No. L-22012/15/2017-IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR
Presiding Officer, Bharat Pandey
I.D. 23/2017
Reference No.L-22012/15/2017[IR(CM-2)] dated: 19.7.2017
Shri Ram Kumar S/o Sh. Hanuman Prasad Saraswat R/o Binani Chowk, Bikaner
V/s
1. Project Head
Neyveli Lignite Corporation India Limited,Barsingsar, Tehsil & District : Bikaner.
2. Proprietor, M/s Middha Enterprises Bikaner Road, Suratgarh – 335804.
AWARD
Dated: 28.11.2017
1. The Central Government in exercise of the powers under clause (d) of Sub Section 1 & 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has referred the following Industrial dispute to this tribunal for adjudication:-
^^D;k izca/ku] eS0 us;oyh fyxukbZV dkiksZjs'ku bf.M;k fy0] chdkusj ds Bsdsnkj QeZ eS0 feM~Mk ,UVjizkbZtst lwjrx< dk deZdkj Jh jke dqekj lqijokbZtj dks fnukad 06-01-2016 ls ukSdjh ls i`Fkd fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa U;k;laxr gS\ ;fn ugh arks deZdkj D;k vuqrks"k ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS \**
2. Pursuant to the receipt of the reference order, registered notices were issued to the parties as per the order of the tribunal fixing. 26.10.2017 for filing statement of claim.
3. On 26.10.17 Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek, CPF No.36598, Manager/Geology, NLC. India Ltd., Barsingsar Project, appeared on behalf of non-applicant. None appeared on behalf of applicant. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek alleged that both the parties have entered into compromise. Next date 16.11.17 was fixed for both the parties to appear for filing compromise or statement of claim.
4. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek on 26.10.2017 filed photocopy of notice sent to non-applicant by tribunal, photocopy of authority dated 23.10.2007 by non-applicant to Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek to appear in tribunal on 26.10.17 for representing the non-applicant, photocopy of minutes of meeting dated 9.6.17 about conciliation held at R.L.C., Jaipur. The content shows that parties have agreed during conciliation to settle their dispute outside the court & withdraw the complaint against Biharilal, Proprietor, Middha Enterprises, Bikaner Road, Suratgarh & NLC India Ltd. before the R.L.C., Jaipur.
5. On 30.10.2017 registered letter sent by applicant Sh. Ramkumar was received by tribunal which was taken on record. The content of the letter says that all the parties of the case have entered into compromise & there is no outstanding dispute between the parties which is required to be settled & applicant does not want to pursue the matter further hence, further proceeding in the matter may be dropped. The letter has been attached with photocopy of an undated compromise.
6. On 16.11.2017 applicant Sh. Ramkumar personally appeared. Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek appeared on behalf of non-applicant. Sh. Ramkumar applicant was identified by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek. Both applicant & Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek on behalf of non-applicant filed undated original compromise which was taken on record. Content of the compromise was read over & explained to both the parties & they admitted to have entered into the compromise supporting the recitals of the compromise deed. Applicant Sh. Ramkumar further file an applicant to decide the case on215 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 the basis of compromise. This application was endorsed by Sh. Sunil Kumar Pareek contending that he is not having any objection in disposal of the matter as alleged by Sh. Ramkumar. Accordingly, matter was fixed for disposal of the case in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.2017.
7. The application of the applicant Sh. Ramkumar dated 16.11.2017 to dispose the case on the basis of compromise & compromise filed on 16.11.17 read as under:-
Jheku~ U;k;ky; dsUnzh; vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,ao Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj
eq- la[;k 23@2017
rk- is- 16-11-2017
jkedqekj cuke eS- us;osyh fyXukbV dk- fy-
Jhekuth]
mDr muoku 'kh"kZd izdj.k esa vkt fn% 16-11-2017 dks rkjh[k is'kh fu;r gSA fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa izfri{k la- 1 o 2 o izfri{kh la- 3 ds chp esa vkilh lgefr ls jkthukek gks x;k gS rFkk fuLrkj.k ;ksX; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha gSA jkthukes dh izfr layXu gSA vr% Jheku~ ls fuosnu gS fd eSa jkedqekj izfri{kh la- 3 vkxs dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk u gh dksbZ Dyse pkgrk gwWaA
vr% izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa jkthukek gks tkus ds vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr dj vkns'k Qjek;k tkosaA
fn% 16-11-2017
izkFkhZ
mijksDr izdkj ls ekeys ds fuLrkj.k ls eSa iw.kZr;k lger gw¡A
gLrk{kj iBuh; jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn tkfr lkjLor fuoklh fcUuk.kh pkSd chdkusj Identified Mr. Ram kumar gLrk{kj viBuh;
gLrk{kj viBuh (S.K. Pareek) (S.K. Pareek/NLCIL) NLC IL on behalf of Project Head / NLC IL
layXud & 1layXud & 1layXud & 1layXud & 1
jkthukekjkthukekjkthukekjkthukek
¼1½ jkedqekj iq= Jh guqeku izlkn lkjLor] tkfr&lkjLor
fuoklh fcuk.kh pkSd] chdkusj] gky Mh&608] eqjyh/kj O;kl uxj chdkusj
------izFke i{k
¼1½ izkstsDV gsM] us;osyh fyXukbV dks- fy-] cjflaglj]
rglhy o ftyk&chdkusj
¼2½ fcgkjhyky] izksijkbZVj] fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst] chdkusj jksM+]
lwjrx<+] ftyk& Jhxaxkuxj
------f}rh; i{k
;g jkthukek mHk; i{kksa }kjk vkt fnuakd 9-6-2017 dks fu"ikfnr fd;k tk jgk gSA
1- ;g fd izFke i{k f}rh; i{k ds ;gka fo/kqr lqijokbZtj ds in ij lsokjr jgk gS ftldks NaVuh ds nkSjku in eqDr djus dks ysdj nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookn jgk gSA mDr fookn dks ysdj izFke i{k ds }kjk {ks=h; dk;kZy;] Je vk;qDr ¼dsUnzh;½ ds le{k ifjosnu is'k fd;k x;k Fkk ftldk fu.kZ; fnukad 24-01-2017 dks ikfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA
2- ;g fd nksuksa i{kdkjku ds e/; izkstsDV gSM o dksjiksjs'ku ds vf/kdkjh;ksa ds }kjk e/;LFkrk o okrkZ ds ifj.kke Lo:i nksuaks i{kksa esa jkthukek gks x;k gSA
3- ;g fd izFke i{k dh NaVuh ckcr f}rh; i{kdkjku us izfrdj ¼eqvkotk½ jkf'k izFke i{k dks vnk dj nh x;h gS ftlds ifj.kke Lo:i izFke i{k] f}rh; i{k ds fo:) lHkh dkuwuh o U;kf;d dk;Zokgh Mªki dj nsxk o iwoZ ds fookn lEcfU/kr dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha djsxkA
4- ;g fd izFke i{k orZeku esa f}rh; i{k ¼us;osyh fyXukbZV dks- fy-½ esa dk;Zjr gS ftldks iwoZ ds fookn dks ysdj rax o ijs'kku ugha fd;k tk;sxkA216 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 5- ;g fd mDr jkthukek fd lHkh 'krksZa ls nksuksa i{k ikcan jgsaxsA
mijksDr jkthukek nksuksa i{kksa }kjk jkth [kq'kh o LorU= lgefr ls fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k gSA
fu"iknudrkZ
gLrk{kj iBuh;
¼1½ ¼jkedqekj½
izFke i{k
¼1½ gLrk{kj viBuh; ¼xksy jcj lhy foi{kh½
¼2½ gLrk{kj viBuh;
jcj LVSEi ¼fe<+k bUVjizkbZtst½
f}rh; i{kdkj
8. On 28.11.17 in Lok- Adalat case was taken up for disposal on the basis of application dated 16.11.17 to dispose the case on the basis of compromise filed by them. None appeared from either side in the Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17, however, the case was disposed on the basis of compromise allowing the application of the parties to dispose the case on the basis of compromise. The order passed in Lok-Adalat on 28.11.17 is read as under:-
28-11-2017 yksd vnkyryksd vnkyryksd vnkyryksd vnkyr
i=koyh vkt yksd vnkyr esa izLrqr gqbZA iqdkj dh x;hA i{kdkj vuqifLFkr gSA lqygukek ds vk/kkj ij eqdnesa dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu fnuakfdr 16-11-17 dk voyksdu fd;kA
i{kdkjksa }kjk lqygukeksa dh rlnhd fnuakd 16-11-17 dks dh tk pqdh gS] vr% i{kdkjksa dh lqygukek ds vk/kkj ij ekeys dks fuLrkfjr djus dh vkosnu Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA bl ekeys dks i{kdkjksa }kjk izLrqr lqygukek fnukafdr 16-11-17 ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA layXud&1 lqygukek ,okMZ dk va'k gksxkA
gLrk{kj viBuh;
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh 9. Award as above.
BHARAT PANDEY, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 84.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 05/1998द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/400/1996-आईआर ;सी-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 84.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 05 of 1998) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/400/1996-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer217 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 05/1998
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None For the workman : None
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 16.11.2017
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/400/1996-IR(C-I) dated 31.12.1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area of M/s. BCCL in dismissing Sh. Baldeo
Das, Miner/Loader w.e.f. 06/08/1993 is justified? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman
entitled?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates none appears subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the meantime. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 85.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 25/2010द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/101/2009-आईआर ;सीएम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 85.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 25 of 2010) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/101/2009-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference No. 25 of 2010
Employer in relation to the management of C.V. Area of M/s. BCCL218 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri S.N.Ghosh, Advocate For the workman : Shri R.R. Ram, Rep.
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 6.12.2017
AWARD
By order No.-L-20012/101/2009 IR-(CM-I), dated.19.02.2010 the Central Govt. in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of Sub–Section (1) and Sub-Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Basantimata Colliery under C.V.Area of M/s. BCCL in
dismissing Shri Khiru Bhuia UG Loader from the service of the company is justified and legal? To
what relief is the workman concerned entitled ?"
2. The case is received from the Ministry of Labour on 08.03.2010. After receipt of reference , both parties are noticed, but after long delay the Sponsoring Union files their written statement on 15.05.2017. And the management files their written statement -cum-rejoinder on 03.08.2017. The point involved in the reference is that the workman has been dismissed from his services on 12.08.2005.
3. During preliminary hearing of this case, domestic enquiry held by the management is accepted by the Sponsoring Union/workman as Fair & Proper .
4. The point involved in the reference is that the workman has been dismissed from his services on the ground of long absence. But he has already out of service since last 12 years. It is felt to give another chance to the workman concerned to serve.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I hold that he be taken into job as a fresh employee in cat-I. But the workman be kept under probation for a period of two year. Therefore the question of back wages does not arise at all.
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 86.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 30/2016द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 11.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/164/2015-आईआर ;सीएम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 86.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 30 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 11.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/164/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer219 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947
REFERENCE No. 30 OF 2016
PARTIES : The Secretary,
Janta Mazdoor Sangh, Old Rajagarh, Bakri Hat,, PO: Jharia,: Dhanbad-828111
Vs.
The General Manager,
Kusunda Area of M/s. BCCL, P.O. Kusunda,, Distt: Dhanbad.828116.
Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : Mr.Vivek Kumar Ld. Representative n behalf of the Management : Mr.Gopal Tiwari Management Representative
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No.L- 20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the Management of Burragarh Colliery under P.B. Area of M/s BCCL in
dismissing Sri Chandradeo, M/Loader vide letter dated 27.12.2002 is fair and justified? To what relief
the concerned workman is entitled to
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/164/2015-IR(CM-I) dt. 10.02.2016 mentioned reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference Case No. 30 of 2016 was registered on 04.03.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The Union and the O.P./Management through their own Representatives respectively appeared, and contested the case to the extent the case was reserved for Award.
2. This Reference case of all about of workman Sri Chndadeo Singh a permanent employee of Burragarh Colliery under P.B. Area of M/s. BCCL being his Pers. No 02983146 was posted as M/Loader in the Colliery. The workman had been successful in keeping his unblemished service track record, very sincere and efficient in the Company till he had proceeded his native place on some emergence work since 03.01.2002 with prior information from the Management .After having returned from the native place when he went to join duty the Management abruptly came out the dismissal letter and handed it over to the workman citing unauthorized absence as reason behind it. Though prior to dismissal, there was no knowledge the workman had about any charge sheet and the enquiry notices whatsoever ever sent to the delinquent workman but the alleged order/ Notices itself contained all about at lengths, he came across with dismissal letter. As per the principle of the natural justice equal opportunity is a pre-requisite condition to be provided to the delinquent workman against whom an enquiry is being constituted ,so long as Shri Chandradeo Singh, no such proceedings had been followed as stated in WS. Whereas it is a well settled law that before dismissal of anybody the enquiry proceedings as well as notice of enquiry should be made available to the charge sheeted workman, but in this case the Management neither did supply the enquiry proceedings nor did publish the enquiry in local daily which is mandatory. As workers are worst hit of all, though there is absolute unanimity on220 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] the move doubting dismissal being beneficial in the long run to Industrial Relations so the dismissal for committing petty misconduct had shockingly a serious blow and disproportionate . The workman was worst hit being rubbed off his livelihood in days of hardship. The Management of P.B. Area in bluntly violating the rules & regulations and the principle of the Natural justice dismissed the workman Chandradeo Singh so the alleged act of the dismissal is unlawful unfair and unjustified and thus is liable to be set aside ,as stated in WS.
3. Whereas categorically denying all the allegations brought in by the Sponsoring Union/petitioner, the Management argued by raising question over maintainability of Industrial Dispute either in law and facts as neither the Sponsoring Union nor the workman never came up during these long span of time, i.e. thirteen years ,with any explanations of maintaining deep rooted silence and, on that score the Reference does not qualify to stand as Industrial Dispute rather liable to be rejected. Management further asserted that the workman concerned started absenting from duty since 03.01.2002 unuthorizedly Since the aforesaid conduct of the workman was a misconduct under clause 26.1.1 of the Certified Standing Order of the Management thereby he deserved for alleged charge-sheet issued on 17.1.2002. Against which the workman submitted his reply which did not found satisfactory at all prompting Management of setting up an Enquiry Committee under Enquiry Officer Sri B.R.Shukla the then Sr. Personnel Officer as Enquiry Officer to conduct the enquiry in accordance with principle of natural justice and to ascertain to the extent the workman committed misconduct, and to offer ample opportunity to the charge sheeted workman to defend himself but deliberately evading for appearance turned the enquiry to declare ex-parte. The findings of the said enquiry were also sent to the workman on his home address by Registered post. It is an extreme example of gross negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual absentee that got rooted leading to his dismissal from service.
4. So long as in relation to Group of the Collieries under the Management of M/s BCCL, a part of the Coal India Ltd., cases like this seldom get significant where numerous cases on same footing might have been pouring in slowly but steadily and the matter never gets more complicated when the labour forces are involved . Moreover this is not a case of day one or two and has turned a regular feature for the years together because they are sometimes subjected to work beyond safety norms. The workmen mostly belonging to illiteracy back ground are usually scared of stepping into the underground Mines due to safety hazards and unhealthy conditions, surrendering in and around the site despite best of safety mechanism/technique in place, However safety related issues have never carved out a permanent niche in the hearts of workers. The Management and its set ups associated in such matter presents an added dimensions and have practice to ignore the move of the such loopholes vulnerable on slightest safety omissions. Workers of the colliery have early adopted safety norms and other safety platforms since they are simple, clean and accurate. Governments too have made every effort to stem usage of safety norms of latest technology in collaboration with their leading Institutions in a bid to facilitate accident free zone and to thwart accident or mishap.
There is nothing adverse report against the workman barring this one. Though alleged absentism had cost him employment. The punishment of dismissal imposed to the misconduct against the workman shielding under the name of penalty on ground of absentism appears to be disproportionate and a harsher to bear, and what needs above all, a fresh outlook in view of easing out of strain in Industrial relationship.
5. The workman concerned who was stripped of his livelihood, needs a little with breather, be provided one more opportunity by offering him fresh appointment in the lowest Grade with two- year probation. Therefore it is ordered that the worker concerned be appointed as fresher in the lowest Cat-I with two-year period on probation by detecting his actual date of birth with the Service Excerpt of the Colliery before providing employment, So long as back wages, it does not arise at all .
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. .—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स टिस्को लिमिटेड के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 53/1997द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 08.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/476/1995-आईआर ;सी-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी221 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 87.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 53 of 1997) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. TISCO Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 08.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/476/1995-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 53/1997
Employer in relation to the management of M/s. TISCO
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate For the workman : None
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 15/11/2017
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/476/1995-IR(C-I) dated 11/02/1997 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/S. TISCO in denial of employment to the dependent of
workman Shri Basudeo Turi, SDL Crew, 6 &7 Pits Colliery is justified? If not, to what relief is the
concerned workman entitled?
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties are noticed. But appearing for certain dates by the workman none appears subsequently. Case remains pending. It is felt that the disputes between the parties have been resolved in the meantime. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 88.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स ई.सी. एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 66/1992द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 29.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/225/1991-आईआर ;सीम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 88.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1,222 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Dhanbad (Ref. No. 66 of 1992) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 29.12.2017.
[No. L-20012/225/1991-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act, 1947
Reference : No. 66/1992
Employer in relation to the management of Kapasara Area of M/s. ECL
AND
Their workmen
Present : Shri R. K. Saran, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri D.K. Verma, Advocate For the workman : Shri D. Mukherjee, Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated- 4/12/2017
AWARD
By order no . L- 20012 /225/1991 /IR (CM-1) dated 06/ 08/1992, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub – section ( 1) and sub – section ( 2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal :
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banerjee and
others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the Eastern Coalfields Ltd in
their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is justified? If
not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled?"
ANNEXURE
List of workmen
1. Sri Radha Shyam Banerjee 2. Sri Sanat Kumar Das 3. Sri Babesh Chandra 4. Bhubneshwar Saw 5. Dhaneshwar Saw 6. Seo Prasad Saw 7. Raj Kumar Saw 8. Brahma Murari Mahato 9. Janta Pd. Ram 10. Sukumar Das 11. Ashok Kumar 12. Balai Chakraborty 13. Sh. Niranjan Ruj 14. Utpal Rai 15. Sukant Chatterjee 16. Kanai Lal Bandopadhyay 17. Uttam Kr. Chattopadhyay 18. Jaidev Chatterjee 19. Nirmal Bhattcharjee 20. Kartik Choudhary 21. Nirmal Chtterjee 22. Hital Nag 23. Dipankar Ghosh 24. Ashim Mallick 25. Rajesh Srivastav 26. Prayag Paswan 27. Goutam Banerjee 28. Asit Chatterjee 29. Rajnath Ram 30. Alok Kr. Chakravorty 31. Asim Chakravorty 32. Ram Krishna Bhattcharjee 33. Krishna Chandra Mukherjee 34. Yusuf Hasan 35. Tapas Chandra Ghoshal 36. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee 37. Pritish Chakravorty 38. Salim Kr. Ghoshal 39. Khoku/Murli Ram Bouri 40. Satish Choudhary 41. B. Madhushudan 42. Pramod Choudhary223 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
43. Anil Kumar 44. Parmeshwar 45. Basant Chakravorty 46. Suresh Chatterjee 47. Sish Kumar 48. Gopal Bhandari 49. Ganpat Mahto 50. Basim Murtin 51. Tapan Kr. Dutta 52. Durga Karmakar 53. Raj Kumar Lohar 54. Ranjit Lohar 55. Basudeo Mandal 56. Basant Kr. Mondal 57. Mukul Mondal 58. Subhendu Mondal 59. Rohit Kr. Mondal 60. Subhash Mondal 61. Dasrath Chandra 62. Basant Kr. Das 63. Dilip Kr. Mahato 64. Anadi Prasad Mistri 65. Ramashish Prasad 66. Krishnandu Chatterjee 67. Kajal Kr. Dey 68. Alok Banerjee 69. Kalyan Kumar Ghosal 70. Ashok Kr. Ganguly 71. Pradip Chakraborty 72. Sandip Chakraborty 73. Partha Banerjee 74. Dulal Chatterjee 75. Harsha Mazumdar 76.Ashok Kr. Chakraborty 77. Jagbandhu Banerjee 78. Dilip Kr. Roy 79. Hari Krishna Dey 80. Ravindra Nath Saha 81. Ajay Kr. Jha 82. Ashok Kr. Singh 83. Madhai Rawani 84. Bhabhotosh Bouri 85. Somnath Mukherjee 86. Probir Kumar 87. Kartik ch. Bandhopadhyay 88. Tarak Nath Chattopadhyay 89. Gunomoy Bandhopadhyay 90. Surya Roy 91. Ajit Kumar Sinha 92. Ranjit Lohar 93. Dhiren Roy 94. Anjay roy 95. Naresh Pd. Saw 96. Ganesh Chandra Gourai 97. Sasti Badyakar 98. Ashish Chandra Mallick 99. Mirinmoy Saha 100. Sadhan Pal 101. Saffiuddin Ansari 102. Subhamay Chakarvorty 103. Arvind Kumar Rawani 104. Sanjay Kr. Das Gupta 105.Parmanand Nayak 106. Pradut Kumar Das 107. Md. Salim Ansari 108. Md. Kalim Ansari 109. Mohammad Allauddin 110. Mohammed Halim Ansari 111. Subhash Kr. Dutta 112. Birendra Kr. Singh 113. Anil Kr. Singh 114. Sudam Prasad Singh 115. Ram Sanmukh singh 116. Sudhir Kr. Singh 117. Randhir Kr. Singh 118. Triloki Pandey 119. Rajiv Kumar 120. Ranjit Kr. Dutta 121. Prakash Mitra 122. Anup Mitra 123. Asit Mondal 124. Siddhanath Nirala 125. Swapan Chakravorty 126. Addyamay Dasgupta 127. Bishwanath Dasgupta 128. Madhu Bakshi 129. Salim Ansari 130. Rakesh Kr. Sinha 131. Shital Chandra Ganguly 132. Rajen Kr. Saw 133. Uday Kr. Saw 134. Suresh Kumar 135. Sadanand Bouri 136. Dip Narayan Bouri 137. Basudeo Mondal 138. Janardan Kumar 139. Narendra Pd. Singh 140. R. B. Barat 141. Ashok Kr. Singh 142. Dipak Kumar 143. Baijnath Prasad 144. Ajit Kumar Singh 145. Surendra Kr. Singh 146. Algu Ram 147. Surendra Kr. Singh 148. Manoj Kr. Singh 149. Indu Bhushan Singh 150 Rabi Shankar singh 151. Kamleshwar Upadhayay 152. Binay Kr. Singh 153. Narendra Singh 154. Ajay Singh 155. Sant lal Choudhary 156. Sunil Kr. Singh 157. Prakash Chandra Singh 158. Raj Kumar Singh 159. Ranjit Singh 160. Nagendra Pd. Singh 161. Jitendra Kumar Singh 162. Binay Kr. Upadhayay224 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
163. Manoj Kr. Singh 164. Kailash Singh 165. Surendra Ram
166. Buchkum Singh 167. Shiv Nath Banerjee 168. Gopal Singh
169. Asim Banerjee 170. Dinesh Yadav 171. . Bijay Manjhi
172. Himanshu Chakraborty 173. Shyam Sundar Roy 174. Manas Mukherjee
175. Manas Chandra Gorai
2. The case is received from Ministry of Labour on 12.08.1992. The Sponsoring Union files their written statement on 01.10.1992. But after long delay the management files their written statement on 23.02.2000. Thereafter rejoinder and document filed by the parties. Three witnesses examined on behalf of the Sponsoring Union as well as two witness examined on behalf of the management. Documents of the management marked as M-1 to M-1/2 but no document marked by the workman.
3. The case of the Sponsoring Union is that the management of Kapasara Area of M/S ECL which is a public Sector Enterprises have employed contract labour in their works for raising of Coal and overburden removal of earth cutting, stone cutting and loading and unloading through hired heavy earth moving machineries are deployed through the above contract Labour.
4. It is further submitted by the Sponsoring Union is that the above action of the management of Kapasara Area of M/S BCCL in their deployment of their workmen as contract Labour is a cloak for supressing the facts that these workmen under contract Labour were really the workmen of the management concerned. In order to deprive them from the status of direct employment of the management and thereby to deny them the proper wages as stipulated and prescribed for them in the NCWA- III & IV.
5. It is further submitted by the sponsoring union that since these workmen under the said contract labour were receiving less wages even than an unskilled workman on the muster Roll of the management, and they were not having paid any other benefits and emenities like provident fund, Gratuity, bonus, Privilage leave etc, they made regular representation for their regularisation as the direct workmen of the said management which were of no avail. The union also took up the case of these workmen for their regularisation as direct workman of the said management in consideration of their continous employments as such so that they could get even the minium wages as prescribed for similar nature of jobs performed by the regular workmen on the muster roll of the management. To which the management turned a deaf ear.
6. On the other hand the case of the management is that there is no valid Industrial dispute in the present case in the eye of law or within the meaning of section 2 K of the I.D Act. The said persons do not come under the defination of sec 2 (K) of I.D.Act . As a matter of fact there is no dispute and the same is fit to be dismissed. As the reference order is vauge and suffers from the vice of total non application of mind by the Govt. and it is therefore vitiated the particulars of the persons & details thereof are also lacking . A vague reference order is no reference order and is rendered null & void.
7. It is further submits that the management specifically clerarly and categorically states and submits that none of the persons named in the list have ever been engaged by the management.
8. It is stated by the management that the persons allotted work through open tender to supply such small number of persons for a timited period to meet the exigency of work. It is respectfully submitted that the persons who supplies such persons for a limited period is paid agreed amount of the work. The method of recruitment, the conditions of service , the scale of pay & conduct Rules regulating the service conditions are governed by the statutes laid down therein . It is settled principle of law that the employees of the management are workmen under the I.D Act.
9. It is further submitted by the management that the petitioner have wrongly stated that the persons working under the contract system are required to work under the management. And the management has its own regular employee and the work through the contractor is taken casually whenever required & the same is not continuous.
10. It is further submitted by the management that it is wholly based on misrepresentation and it represent deliberate bid to exploit this organisation and to induct into employment illegally some outsiders through back door method. Such prayer is also without any substance or merit quit apart from inherent legal and infirmities in the reference order itself. The prayer of the so-called union is therefore lable to be rejected.
11. This is the case of regularisation of 175 workmen . The case of the workmen is that they were engaged under the management, as coal cutter in the mines. Through contractor.
12. The dispute of regularisation was raised, more than twentyfive years ago. During that time, reference received written statement and counter filed. Evidence of the parties also recorded long back. Purused the evidence, the225 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 workman stated that they were contract worker under Khalsa Brothers.But the contractor has not been examined in the case nor the contractor identified any of the workmen.
13. In the meantime 25 years or more elapsed. It is not known as to how many workmen now alive and how many persons crossed the age of 60 years i.e the age of superannuation. As per evidence of WW-1 he say that he was working from 1982. In 1995 the witness of WW-2 Sri Asim Kr. Banerjee is 41 years old it means now he was 63 years old.
14. On purusal of the case it is found that No Identity Card, age proof, Pay slip etc filed in this case. Since the concerned workman are not identified at this stage, this Tribunal constrained to pass award infavour of the workman. Therefore the Tribunal is not in a position to regularise the workmen due to want of identification of the workmen. Upon this one judgment of constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in case of SAIL- Vs National Union Waterfront Workers reported in (2001) 7 SCC-1 says that the engagement of the contractor in the instant work was not prohibited category of work.
15. Considering the facts and circumstance of this case, I hold that the demand of Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India that S/Shri Radhashyam Banderjee and others 174 being the contract Labour are required to be regularised by the Eastern Coalfields Ltd in their establishment as well as these workers are also entitled for the benefits of NCWA-IV is not justified. Hence they were not entitled to get any relief.
This is my award.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 9 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 89.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स इंडियन एयरलाइंस के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 1, दिल्ली के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 275/2011द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 21.12.2017 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-11012/59/2000-आईआर ;सी-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 9th January, 2018
S.O. 89.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, New Delhi (Ref. No. 275 of 2011) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Indian Airlines and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 21.12.2017.
[No. L-11012/59/2000-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No. 1: ROOM No. 511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, SECTOR 10, DWARKA, DELHI – 110 075
ID No. 275/2011
Smt. Kulbir Bedi, 59/124, Ajit Nagar, VIP Road, Agra, Uttar Pradesh 282 001
…Workman
Versus
The General Manager (IR), Indian Airlines . IGI Airport, New Delhi
…Management226 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
In the present case a reference was received vide letter No.L.11012/59/2000 (C-I) dated 29.08.2000 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and Section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial disputes, terms of which are as under:
Whether the action of the management of Indian Airlines, Northern Region, New Delhi in terminating the services of Mrs. Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess with effect from 07.02.1995 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?
2. Thereafter, a corrigendum was received vide letter No.11012/59/2000-IR(C-I) dated 19.01.2015, wherein the date of termination of the workman was to be read as '12.03.1996' instead of '07.02.1995'.
3. Brief facts giving rise to the present case are that Smt. Kulbir Bedi (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) was appointed as Air Hostess with Indian Airlines (hereinafter referred to as the management ) with effect from 01.11.1976. She has been discharging her duties sincerely and diligently and there was no complaint against her at any time and the claimant had not availed any kind of leave except as authorized under the law and never remained absent from her duties in an unauthorized manner.
4. It is alleged in para 3 of the statement of claim that she fell sick on 06.09.1993 and was examined by panel doctor of the management. She was advised complete bed rest by the doctor and intimation in this regard was sent by way of an application, alongwith the medical certificate, to the Operations department of the management, in which the claimant was working. Her salary was later on sanctioned by the management. The claimant was advised further medical rest and she from to time sent requisite applications supported by medical certificates for sanction of her leave but the management did not convey any sanction of leave for reasons best known to them despite the fact that medical certificate was also furnished to the management. It is further alleged that on 27.02.1994 the aged mother of the claimant who was living with her expired and the claimant was under a social obligation to perform her last rites. When the claimant was declared fit, she reported for duties in 1994 but was not allowed to join duties on the pretest that some disciplinary proceedings were being initiated against her. No show cause notice or memo was served on her. She again on 07.02.1995 reported for duties but she was intimated that her services have been terminated and an attempt was also made to hand over a cheque of Rs.7439.55 towards the alleged dues, which were not received by the claimant earlier. No letter of termination of service was served upon the claimant. Thereafter the claimant made a representation to the various authorities. She was highly mentally disturbed and due to family circumstances there was nobody to look after her small children.
5. Thereafter, claimant received a notice from National Industrial Tribunal regarding approval of her application NTB 16 of 96 dated 05.06.1996. The claimant also filed reply to the said application under Section 33-2 of the Act and she has objected for grant of approval of the said application of the management. However, the Tribunal vide letter order dated 04.11.1996 while granting approval to the application of the management also permitted the claimant to raise appropriate industrial dispute before the appropriate authority. Thereafter, she represented to the management and conciliation also took place between the parties which virtually failed and finally reference was received in the manner stated above from the appropriate Government for adjudication of the present dispute.
6. Claim was contested by the management who filed reply thereto wherein certain preliminary objections was taken. However, it was admitted that the claimant herein was removed from service vide memo dated 12.03.1996 and appropriate Government has made reference presuming termination of the claimant from service with effect from 07.02.1995. The claimant was absent from duties with effect from 06.05.1993 on the pretext of being sick and on 06.09.1993, as stated in the statement of claimant. However, she did not get any leave sanctioned in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations and thereafter her absence from duty which was irregular and without any sufficient explanation was treated as misconduct. She has filed fake medical certificates. She was also asked by the management to appear before the medical officer of the management but she did not comply with the directions. She was also charge sheeted in terms of charge sheet dated 22.12.1993/10.01.1994 Ex.MW5/12. Claimant has not sent any reply to the charge sheet nor participate in the domestic enquiry. Thereafter, ex-parte enquiry was conducted against the claimant. Claimant was duly informed vide memo dated 29.07.1993 that the medical certificate furnished by here has not been accepted by the management. Resultantly, on the basis of enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer, claimant herein was removed from service and a cheque of Rs.7439.55 pertaining to her past arrears/dues was handed over to her.
7. Vide letter no.Z-22019/6/2007-IR-(C-II) dated 22.12.2008, the case was transferred to CGIT cum Labour Court No.II, New Delhi for adjudication. Again vide order No.Z-22019/6/2007-IR(C-II) dated 30.03.2010 transferred the case back to this Tribunal for adjudication.
8. Against this factual background, my learned predecessor vide order dated 13.04.2009, framed the following preliminary issue:
227 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939'Whether the enquiry conducted by the management is just, fair and legal?'. If not, what orders have to be passed in the case?'
9. Record also shows that additional issues were also framed on 08.09.2011, as under:
(i) Whether punishment dismissal commensurate to the misconduct of the claimant?
(ii) In terms of reference
(iii) Relief
10. Both parties adduced evidence on the preliminary issue and it is clear from the record that this Tribunal vide order dated 07.02.2013 held that the enquiry conducted by the management is not legal and fair and the same is in violation of principles of natural justice. It was also observed that the documents filed by the management have also not been proved during the enquiry before this Tribunal. Resultantly, this issue was decided in favour of the claimant and against the management.
11. Thereafter opportunity was granted to the management to adduce evidence afresh on the charge sheet/misconduct committed by the claimant. Thereafter, management examined Ms.Prabha Devi, Dr. Kirti Suri Verma and Shri Rajesh Seth, whose affidavits are Ex.MW3/A, Ex.MW4/A and Ex.MW5/A respectively. All these witnesses have tendered in evidence various documents and I would be referring to these documents while drawing my conclusions. Claimant in order to rebut the case of the management examined herself as WW1 whose affidavit is Ex.WW1/B and also tendered in evidence certain documents.
Finding of Additional Issue No. (i), (ii) and (iii)
12. All these issues are being taken up together for the purpose of discussion as they are interrelated and can be conveniently disposed of. Before I proceed to consider the comparative merits of the submissions made on behalf of either of the parties, it is necessary to delineate the charges mentioned in the charge sheet Ex.MW5/12 (also marked as Ex.MW1/1) and the same is as under:
'You reported sick on 06.05.1993 and since then you have neither reported back for duties nor sent any intimation in regard to your sickness. You were advised by OM vide his letters dated 12.07.1993 and 29.07.1993 to report back for duties and advised to see the IA Medical Officer which you failed to do so. You were also advised by IM's letters dated 12.09.1993 and 06.10.1993 that medical certificates submitted by you have not been accepted by our IA Medical officer, therefore, advised to see the IA Medical Officer, failing which disciplinary action will be initiated against you. However, you failed to do so.
You are, therefore, absenting unauthorizedly with effect from 06.05.1993.
The above, if proved, would constitute an act of misconduct under the Standing Orders applicable to you, such as:
Clause 16(6) Absence without leave for more than 8 consecutive days or overstaying the sanctioned leave without sufficient grounds or proper or satisfactory explanation within a week from the date of termination of leave sanctioned.
Clause 16(8) Breach of any Standing Order or any law or rules applicable to the establishment.
13. Evidence of the management regarding proof of misconduct is testimony of MW3 and that of MW5. It is clear from the overall examination of the charge sheet that the case of the management is primarily is based upon the allegation that the claimant herein has remained absent from duties without any sanction of leave and the so called medical certificates filed by the claimant as proof of hier illness were fake documents so as to avail leave. Admittedly onus of proof of unauthorized absence of the claimant from duties is upon the management who is required to adduce cogent and reliable evidence to prove the said charges against the claimant who has also furnished various documents in the form of applications as well as medical certificates so as to show that she was really suffering from illness.
14. It is further clear that the claimant has reported sick on 06.09.1993 and case of the management is that no intimation was sent by the claimant to the management regarding her sickness and she was asked vide letter dated 12.07.1993 and 19.07.1994 to report back for duties. However, she has submitted medical certificate which were not accepted by the medical officer of the management.
15. It is also necessary to point out here that when domestic enquiry has been held by the Tribunal to be unfair and against the principles of natural justice, in that eventuality management is required to adduce fresh evidence so as to prove charges of misconduct against an employee. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Neeta Kaplish vs. Presiding Officer (1999) Lab.IC 44 while considering the question of power of Labour Court to permit adducing fresh evidence held that under section 11-A of the Act when opportunity has been availed by the management to adduce evidence on228 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] the charges of misconduct made against an employee, in that eventuality, evidence recorded during the course of domestic enquiry or record pertaining to domestic enquiry would not constitute fresh evidence as all these documents have been found by the labour court to be defective and such record would also not constitute 'material on record within the meaning of Section 11A of the Act as the enquiry proceedings have now been ignored altogether.
16. Management examined Ms.Prabha Rani as MW3 who has stated that she was working in the Operations Department where the claimant was earlier serving from 1993 to 96. She was working as Deputy Chief Airhostess with the management and the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi was working under her supervision. She has also conversant with the signature and handwriting of the claimant. She is not aware as to who was the Operations Manager in the year 1993 and she is not competent to recommend disciplinary action against the claimant. She has further deposed that airhostesses have to report for duties as and when she has to fly and she had to remain standby at her residence also as in case of emergency she may be called for duties. She has deposed that the claimant has submitted leave application in 1993 and her leave record for the year 1993 was in her possession, copy of which is Ex.MW3/W1. As per this document, claimant remained on sick leave for the period 06.05.1993 to 30.09.1995. She has further deposed to a court question that no leave in the period mentioned above was sanctioned in favour of the claimant , as such, she was on unauthorized absence. However, she has clarified that the claimant has been sending leave applications supported by medical certificates. Management has also doctors who attended to the employees, but she did not recollect whether Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was one of such doctors on the panel of the management. She has further stated in her cross examination that here medical certificate was considered by the management and her medical certificate was considered by the management and her leave application was refused. However, she had not brought the record pertaining to refusal of the leave application of the relevant period for the year 1992 to 1994 as well as list of panel of doctors. She has further clarified that she is not aware as to how letter Ex.MW3/13 was sent to the claimant as matter is more than 20 years old. She has denied Ex.ME3/2 to Ex.MW3/7 are fabricated documents. Ex.MW3/2 is letter dated 07.05.1993 written by Manager Operations and copy of the same is alleged to have been sent to Ms.Kulbir Bedi, the claimant herein. Similarly Ex.MW3/5 dated 26.08.1993 is written by Operations Manager to Operations IANR(D) which contains details of medical certificates sent by the claimant to the management. This letter again shows that the medical certificate in fact was sent by the claimant regarding her illness in the year 1993 to the management. Otherwise, there would not have been such specific mention of the same in this letter. Ex.MW3/6 is also regarding medical certificate in respect of claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi and the same is issued by Dr. Aruna Chaudhary. This again shows that the claimant was sick from September 93 to 18.09.1993. There is another document Ex.MW3/7 filed by the management regarding fitness of the claimant.
17. MW4 Ms.Kirti Suri Verma was Senior Manager during the year 1992-95 in Indian Airlines. She has tried to prove various documents issued under her signatures. She has admitted that there were more than 100 doctors on the panel meant for treatment of regular employees and employees were supposed to visit the doctors on the panel for the treatment. However, she was not in a position to produce the panel of doctors of the relevant period who were engaged for the medical examination of the regular employees. She has clarified that Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not competent for long term treatment. However, she has competent to treat for short term treatment . The witness has not shown any document as to how Dr. Aruna Chaudhary was not competent and empanelled to provide long term treatment for ailments. She was also given time by the court to produce original of specialized doctors for treatment of its regular employees who are suffering from such illness. However, she was not in a position to produce any record. She has admitted that the claimant never appeared before her. She has made remarks on the backside of the medical certificate Ex.MW4/W1 who appeared before her. She is also not aware whether the department has sent this communication to the claimant or not as the doctors do not directly deal with the employees. She further could not recall whether after 02.02.1993 she examined the medical certificates of the claimant or not. The claimant was informed to report as per submission of this witness vide Ex.MW3/3. However, she has admitted that Ex.MW3/3 does not mention that her medical certificates have been rejected for want of supporting documents. Moreover, evidence on record regarding this communication was not sent to the claimant by the management.
18. MW5 Shri Sanjiv Seth has also tried to support the case of the management. His deposition is broadly based on official record. He has admitted that Ex.MW1/1 letter Ex.MW5/5, Ex,MW3/6, letter Ex.MW5/7 and Ex.MW5/6 were never sent to the claimant. He has further deposed that Ex.MW5/4 was not sent through post to the claimant and the same was placed in the pigeon hole/locker. He further admitted that the claimant was on sick leave with effect from 07.05.1993. A bare perusal of Ex.MW5/4 would show that Operations Manager has clearly mentioned that period of sick leave from 29.11.1992 to 06.01.1993 and 05.10.1993 to 23.11.1993 to be treated as leave on loss of pay. However, it is clear from the testimony of this witness that these letters were never sent/conveyed to the claimant. It is further clear from the statement of Shri Seth MW5 that there is no proof of dispath of any of the letters mentioned above and competent authority in respect of the claimant herein was Operations Management, as is clear from Standing Orders Ex,MW5/16. He also stated that Ex.MW5/9 that the claimant Ms.Kulbir Bedi has signed the medical certificate issued by Dr.Aruna Chaudhary, Dr.Vijay Verma and Shri Vijay Mehta as proof of her illness. There is nothing on record to show that the management had rejected the aforesaid medical certificates submitted by the229 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 claimant to the management as proof of her illness. No communication was sent to the claimant regarding rejection of these medical certificates by the competent authority, i.e Manager Operations.
19. At this stage, it is also appropriate to refer to the statement of MW1 Ms.Kulbir Bedi. She has filed a detailed affidavit Ex.WW1/B in support of the stand taken in her pleadings and she has made reference to the medical certificates Ex.WW1/1 to Ex/WW1/17. She has clearly deposed that she was on leave from 06.05.1993 to 26.02.1993 when her mother expired. She has also submitted various medical certificates to the management. She has specifically deposed that she never received Ex.MW5/9. She had communicated to the management in the prescribed form that she is sick from 06.05.1993. She has also furnished postal receipts regarding sending of medical certificates and other application when she reported sick and was advised medical rest by the doctors whereas management in the present case has not proved that any of the communication regarding rejection of her leave was either sent by post or in any other manner to the claimant. Letter Ex.MW5/5 dated 12.07.1993 was admittedly not sent to the claimant. Similarly, letter Ex.MW5/10 was also not sent to the claimant. Evidence regarding rejection of leave of the claimant and asking her to report for duties has not been proved by the management. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that the claimant was willfully and intentionally absenting from duties or that she was unauthorizedly absent from duties for the period mentioned above. The court cannot ignore the fact that the claimant has got herself examined by Dr. Aruna Chaudhary who is a competent doctor and on panel of the management, a fact which was not disputed even during the course of arguments and she was initially advised rest by her. Management could not cite any rules or regulations or show any document regarding panel of doctors from whom the claimant was legally required to get herself examined for long term treatment. Moreover, there is no positive evidence on record tht management has not accepted medical certificates Ex.MW4/1, Ex.MW4/2, Ex.MW4/3, Ex.MW4/4 and submitted by the claimants as proof of her illness. In fact, evidence is suggestive of the fact that no communication in this regard was sent to the claimant. Resultantly, absence of the claimant cannot be said to be willful or unauthorized when as per MW5 Shri Sanjeev Seth, she was on sick leave with effect from 07.05.1993. Even this was not conveyed to the claimant.
20. I have also gone through the various authorities relied upon by the management, i.e. Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sardar Singh (AIR (2004) SC 4161). It was a case of long term absence of a conductor who remained on leave for more than 272 days. Even in the domestic enquiry, he could not adduce any evidence so as to prove the case of his absence. It was against this background that Hon'ble Apex Court took a view that long term absence of such an employee is fatal. As such, his removal/dismissal from the job was held to be justified. In the case on hand, as discussed above, the claimant has admittedly applied for leave and medical certificate was also sent regarding her ailment by the claimant from time to time, which fact has also been admitted by the management. Moreover, management has nowhere conveyed to the claimant that her medical certificates have not been accepted. In such circumstances, there was no occasion for the claimant to be under the impression that she is on leave unauthorizedly, whereas in the case relied upon by the management, notice was sent to the claimant to join duties, to which he had not responded. This case relied upon is distinguishable and is not application to the controversy on hand.
21. Similarly, in the case of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Narain Singh (MANU/DE/2\4143/2013), the workman was absent from duties and his absence was treated as leave without pay. However, later on also workman remained on unauthorized leave for very long period, which showed lack of interest of the workman in the job and he was found to be a habitual absentee. Workman in the said case even did not participate in the domestic enquiry, which was held ex- parte against him. Accordingly, he was held guilty of misconduct and order of 'removal from service' was passed against the workman. Since in the above case also, circumstances are clear that the workman, who was a conductor, remained absent for more than 211 days and he neither filed any reply to the charge sheet nor did he participate in the domestic enquiry. In such a situation, there was no escape from the conclusion that the workman was guilty.
22. As a sequel to the above discussion, it is held that the management has failed to prove that the claimant herein was willfully or unauthorizedly absent for the period mentioned in the charge sheet. As such, she is held to be not guilty of the misconduct under the law. As a necessary corollary, it is held that the action of the management of Indian Airlines, Northern Region in terminating the services of Ms.Kulbir Bedi, Air Hostess is totally illegal and unjustified. The claimant is entitled to full back wages till the date of her retirement, i.e. 31.08.2002 and she is also entitled to all the consequential benefits to which she was otherwise entitled had she been in the job till the date of her retirement i.e. 31.08.2012. Further, the claimant would be entitled to all retirral benefits. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
Dated : December 13, 2017
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer230 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 90.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 108/2004द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/96/2004-आई.आर. ;सी-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 90.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 108 of 2004) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 108 OF 2004
PARTIES : The Vice President,
Janta Mazdoor Sangh,
Dugda Coal Washery,
PO Dugda, Distt: Bokaro-829116
Vs.
The General Manager,
Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL, PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad-826001.
Order No. L-20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : None
On behalf of the Management : Mr D. K.Verma, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 16th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L- 20012/96/2004-IR (C-I) dt.02.09.2004.
SCHEDULE
Whether the demand of the Janta Mazdoor Sangh from the Management of BCCL, Western Washery Zone to regularize Sri Hari Narayan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope as supervisor is fair and proper? If so, to what relief/benefit are Shri Hari Naryan Chouhan and Megha Lal Gope entitled and from what date?"
2. Neither the Union Representative nor the workmen concerned are reported to be present on date nor let the evidence of the workman be completed despite a fresh notice dt 12.09.2017 was sent at the address of the Union referred in Order of the Reference itself.Mr.D.K.Verma, Ld. Advocate registered his appearance on the date not for this time but all along since its inception and rolling out as Reference Case .The case is all about denial of the regularization231 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 to the workmen concerned to the posts of supervisors by the Management seeking reliefs there under by staking claim.
On perusal and close scrutiny of the case and materials on record, it has been apparently clear that the Sponsoring Union /workmen seem to be in no hurry to produce the witness to let complete the chapter of evidence of workman even after having availed more than six adjournments or so .The tardy pace of case over evidence of witness appears to have paid off its own purpose as it stayed rolling out over status of producing witness since long time back. The way, the Union Representative /petitioners walk drops points to extract the real conclusion that they are least interested to get to finality of the case through adjudication rather appear much more inclined only for adjournments over the times, Simultaneously the Tribunal also do not see violation of the natural justice to let the case be wrapped up rather rolling over infinity. This also signifies status of the case, as of now, stands crawling over evidence of the workman since 14.12.2005 with no headway in sight. As such proceedings have abruptly stalled over completion of evidence of workman. The case appears to have lost its merits On this count, it has been viewed not to be a mute spectator to let the situation crawl for a long spell of time rather pushing it for final closure in the line of the principle of natural interest on presumption of non-existent of issue in real sense . So the case is wrapped up as "No Industrial Dispute ".Accordingly an 'Award of No Dispute' is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 91.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 82/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/100/2015-आई.आर. ;सीएम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 91.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 82 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 82 OF 2015
The Secretary
PARTIES : Jharkhnd Janta Mazdoor Union, Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih PO: Jagjivan Nagar, Dhanbad
Vs.
The General Manager,
Western Washery Zone, of M/s BCCL, PO: Mahuda, Dhanbad.
L-20012/100/2015-IR (CM-I) dt 09.10.2015
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep. On behalf of the Management : Mr. Ganesh Pd., Ld. Adv.232 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 25th September, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015.
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management of Western Washery Zone of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Somar Chouhan from the services vide office order dated 7/11.12.1997 is fair and justified? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?'
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/100/2015-IR(CM-I) dt 09.10.2015 of the above mentioned reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference Case No. 82 of 2015 was registered on 26.10.2015 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Representative / Counsel appeared, and contested the case to the extent the Reference case stands reserved .
2. Here is the case of Ref. No. 82 of 2015 related to the workman Sri Somar Chouhan a permanent employee of Moonidih Coal Washery of M/s BCCL by designation Driver having personnel no. 01298983 had been keeping unblemished track record of service till he had fallen in illness due to which he could not be able to perform his duty w.e.f. 27.1.1996 .After recovery from illness the workman concerned reported for duty to the Management with Medical Certificate but the Management turned down his request and did not allow him to join the duty as the workman was absent due to sickness .However the Management went one step ahead by issuing the charge sheet to the workman on the ground of absentism on 12.03.1997, as the workman do not see misconduct being on absetism under the provisions of the Certified Standing Order an by-laws of the Group of the Collieries of the M/s BCCL exclusively based at Dhanbad .Though the workman submitted his reply against the said alleged charge sheet that led to formation of Enquiry to go the bottom of the facts and, to ascertain the misconduct to the extent the workman had committed .The Enquiry Officer in a biased and prejudiced manner conducted the whole enquiry proceedings which may be termed unfair ,illegal and unjustified and not in the line of principle of natural justice rather came out with guilty of the charges which culminated into much harsher punishment as dismissal by the Disciplinary Authority throwing the workman on the verge of starvation for not fault of his own in view of the petty misconduct of absentism which do not seem rational rather disproportionate to the alleged misconduct of absetnism, as stated by the workman in WS .This is certainly not the kind of penalty the worker would expect from the Management. In the enquiry the workman was held guilty of the charge for petty misconduct which is shockingly disproportionate as the dismissal amounts to capital punishment in service arena. Post dismissal the workman made appeal to the Management to dispose of the appeal of the workman in accordance with the provision of the Certified Standing Orders. But arbitrarily and illegally stand the Management had so far, did not yield any consideration. The contention of the Workman was never taken into consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is not fair and proper and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice as alleged by the Workman. The workman was handed out the dismissal letter by the Project Officer of Moonidih Coal Washery on dated 7/11-12-1997. Post dismissal the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which is dubbed a violation of the provision of the Certified Standing Order itself. The allegation - misconduct , as came out by the Management was not established during the enquiry nor did workman's petition for prayer take into consideration before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal .So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal stands unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service with full back wages summarily.
3. Contrary to the fact, by categorically denying and brushing aside all allegations of the Union , the OP/Management asserted that the case is not maintainable either in law or in fact as the dispute has been fabricated to twisty suppression and non disclosure of material facts admitting that the workman Sri Somar Chouhan was a permanent employee of Munidih Coal Washery designated as Driver (T),as stated by the Management in its W.S., The workman had started absenting from his duty without information, prior permission or reasonable cause since 27.01.1996,thereby committing a misconduct. The Management asserted that upon framing the said charge sheet dt. 12.03.1997 the workman was asked to reply which was received by the Management on 02.07.1997. After examining233 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939 the properly, the reply was not found satisfactory leading to formation of domestic enquiry under Shr B.K.Choubey, then Personnel Officer and Sri T. Chakrabotry as Enquiry Officer and Management Representative respectively .The Enquiry Officer issued notice of Enquiry to both the parties to participate in Enquiry proceedings .Though the workman had choice by his side to keep co-worker in his defence but his denial had nothing to do with the option . During the course of enquiry the workman was held guilty of the charges brought in against him. After conducting enquiry the Enquiry Officer submitted report holding the workman guilty under clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Orders of the Company as the charges have been fully established without any doubt. During the course of enquiry proceedings so long his past habitual offender on absentism had been corroborated not by Management Representative but witness also. Further assertion that the dismissal order of the workman had not been merely singled out to one incident alone engulfing therein the whole past track of his service record especially the poor attendances in the past couple of years. as the workman an permanent employee under the Employer had been in the habit of remaining absent without leave and no satisfactory cause .He had turned a habitual offender slowly but steadily .The Said act of absentism as quoted by workman's saying attributed to workman's poor mental state that led to keep the Management grappling in darkness . The Competent Authority having gone through the enquiry proceedings and its findings and related papers fully agreed in principle and thus viewing the past conduct of his attendances and proper application of mind, inflicted the punishment of dismissal from service which is absolutely right, the workman deserved for .So the conduct and manner in which enquiry held never got mired at any stage . And, the dismissal of Sri Somar Chouhan is legally justified and proportionate to the misconduct committed by him. Overall the whole the domestic enquiry conducted by Enquiry officer is fair, proper and in accordance with the principle of natural justice. There is nothing sort of violation of natural justice in the said enqury.
Not surprisingly , cases of absentism get insignificant , unprecedented and nothing unusual in times so long as Groups of the Collieries under the BCCL Management are concerned as hailing illiteracy backgrounds of workmen, mostly intent to move on prolonged leave. The Misconduct of worker in this regard often run the risk of adversely impacting the morale of the other Workers but matter becomes much more complicated with their involvement .The work nature seems obviously arduous and tedious apart from all time being in hale & hearty in physical structure too to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several feets or more from the surface. The exodus of the workers from site of working has become a major humanitarian crisis and sparked widely dissent before the Management fraternity that still to realize that they are also part of the production and regards them an indispensable pillar for generations. Summing up, quantum of the punishment as dismissal inflicted upon the workman concerned against the misconduct of absentism appears a little bit harsher and not in proportionate too .So a fresh look on the issue cannot be ruled out.
So, there is nothing improper, unlawful and wrong-doings if the workman be provided a little bit breather. Ultimately in the light of the above, it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned as Cat. -I with probation up to two years but no back wages, whatsoever.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 92.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी. सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक
अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 55/2014द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/104/2014-आईआर ;सीएम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 92.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 55 of 2014) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer234 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO 55 OF 2014
PARTIES : The Jt. Gen. Secretary,
Bahujan Mazdoor Union,
Mines Rescue Station,
PO Dhansar, Dhanbad. 828106
Vs.
The General Manager,
E.J.Area of M/s BCCL,
PO: Bhowra, Dhanbad.828302
Order No. L-20012/104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : None On behalf of the Management : Mr. U.N. Lal, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 27th October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-20012/ 104/2014-IR (CM-I) dt.09.10.2014.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the Management of Sudamdih Incline Mine of M/s BCCL in dismissing Sri Narayan Lohar , Ex.M .Loader from the services of the Company vide office order dated 07.04.2010 is fair and justified ? To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to?"
2. Neither the workmen concerned nor any one from the Sponsoring Union appeared on date, nor did file the long awaited W.S despite issuance of formal notices dt. 10.11,2014 ,09.03.2015 and ,29.06.2015 at the addresses of both the parties concerned referred in the Order of the Reference itself barring 29.06.2015 which was sent to the Union alone. None came out as Representative of the Management on date but was represented all along by the Ld. Adv. Mr. U.N. Lal. The case deals with dismissal of the workmen by the Management seeking reliefs by challenging it.
On meticulously study of the record concerned it has been absolutely clear the case dates back to the year of 2014 and it has been more than two years or so since it stands to where it was crawling one stage over the years despite adjournment over more than ten times . It appears that the workmen's own initiatives seem to have paid off as the case stayed rolling out over one stage over years .This also signifies to gesture and conduct of the workman concerned that he is no longer interested to contest to the instant case to finality through adjudication rather bent upon to get adjournments .In real sense the case do not seem to have merits as of now , and the very existence Industrial Dispute indeed any more appears to have ceased just because prolonged silence maintained on their part ,Usually, the Tribunal also do share the opinion of let it rolling further will be proved mere wastage of precious time and energy and a hindrance in tackling the backlog of cases. Under these circumstances it would not amount to be unfair, unjust and in line of violation of the natural justice if the instant case is closed on presumption of non-existent of any Industrial Dispute as of now, between the parties concerned. Under such circumstance and facts, the case should be closed as no-existent Industrial Dispute any longer owning to sheer disinterestedness of the Union/workman. Accordingly "No Industrial Dispute" Award is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer235 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939
नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 93.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स सेल के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 68/2015द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-26012/23/2015-आईआर ;सीम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 93.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 68 of 2015) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. SAIL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-26012/23/2015-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO. 68 OF 2015
PARTIES : Sri R.C. Ram,
Qr. No. 1099, Sector IX-B, PO: Bokaro Steel City, Distt: Bokaro
Vs.
The General Manager (P & A)
SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant, P.O. Bokaro Steel City Distt. Bokaro-827001.
Order No. L-26012/23/2015-IR(MI) dt. 23.09.2015
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : None On behalf of the Management : Mr. D. K. Verma, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Steel
Dated, Dhanbad, the 3rd October, 2017
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. L-26012/23/2015-IR(M) dt.23.09.2015
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management of SAIL /Bokaro Steel Plant in dismissing Sri R.C.Ram from
the services of the Company w.e.f. 20/11.8.2011 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned
workman entitled?"
2. Neither the workman nor any one on behalf of the workman/petitioner is reported to be present on date nor did file the much-awaited WS due on his part on date since long even after serving a fresh notice; whereas Mr. D.K.Verma, LD Advocate for the Management is present. Though Notices dt.5. 9.16, and the last one posting date on 06.01.2016236 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] were mailed to the address of the Sponsoring Union referred in the Order of the Reference itself but all went in vain even. The Management side was also kept informed .The case is related to dismissal from the service of the workman by the Management thereby seeking relief by challenging it.
A through and emphatically scrutiny of the case record, it transpires that the case seems to be stalled over filing the W.S. rest with the workman for over more than two years or so. Even after stepping over the first stage, there seems to be no urgency on the part of the workman to file the much awaited WS despite providing sufficient times as much as more than ten times since 24.02.2016. This indicates to gesture that the workman is no more interested to get the instant case to final adjudication fuelling speculation that the case either must have been resolved out of Court or an issue of non-existent, as of now. Simultaneously the Tribunal do not differ over of the view of keeping the case rolling merely for dates, is of no use rather wastage of time and energy even after adjournments for more than seven times, finally extract the conclusion of closing down for the end of the natural justice. Under these circumstances the case is closed; and an order of the "No Dispute Award" is passed.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
नई दिल्ली, 10 जनवरी, 2018
का.आ. 94.—औद्योगिक विवाद अध्निियम, 1947 ;1947 का 14द्ध की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार मैसर्स बी.सी.सी.एल. के प्रबंधतंत्रा के संब( नियोजकोंंंंंं और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच, अनुबंध में निदष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार
औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय नं. 2, ध्नबाद के पंचाट ;संदर्भ संख्या 35/2016द्ध को प्रकाशित करती है, जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 10.01.2018 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-20012/13/2016-आईआर ;सीएम-Iद्ध]
एम. के. सिंह, अनुभाग अध्किारी
New Delhi, the 10th January, 2018
S.O. 94.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 35 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 10.01.2018.
[No. L-20012/13/2016-IR (CM-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Shri R.K.Saran, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act, 1947.
REFERENCE NO 35 OF 2016
PARTIES : The Secretary,
Jharkhand Janta Mazdoor Union, Vishwakarma Colony, Nutundih PO: Jagjivan Nagar Dhanbad-826003
Vs.
The General Manager,
Lodna Area of M/s BCCL PO : Khas Jeengora Dhanbad.
Ministry 's Order No L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : Mr. P. Mandal, Ld. Rep. of the Union On behalf of the Management : Mr. N.M. Kumar, Ld. Adv.
State : Jharkhand
Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th September, 2016
237 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : जनवरी 13, 2018/पौष 23, 1939AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their Order No. 20012/ 13/2016-IR (CM-I) dt 17.06.2016
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management of Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL in dismissing Shri Dasrath Ravidas, Prs. No. 101837, Ex-Miner Loader from the services of the Company vide letter No. BBC/95/4450 dated 20.11.1995 is fair and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled?
On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/13/2016-IR(CM-I) dt 17.06.2016 of the above mentioned reference from the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, the Reference Case No. 35 of 2016 was registered on 22.06.2016 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to issue notices through the Registered Posts to the parties concerned, directing them to appear in the Court on the date fixed, and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said order, notices by the Registered Posts were sent to the parties concerned.
Both the parties made their appearances and filed their pleadings and photocopies of their documents. The Union/Petitioner and the O.P./Management through their own Ld. Rep. /Counsel appeared, and contested the case.
2. This is an another case based on footing of dismissal of the workman of Dasrath Ravidas who was a permanent employee bearing P. No. 101837 designated as the Ex. M/Loader of Bararee Colliery under Lodna Area under the Management of M/s BCCL, a Group of Collieries exclusively based at Dhanbad keeping unblemished track record of service record had abruptly become sick since 16.03.1994 and started absenting but under reported it to the Management accordingly. After recovery when from illness when the workman reported to the Management for resumption of duty, the Management deliberately and illegally did not let him join the duty rather went one step ahead by issuing a charge sheet to the workman on 20.07.1995 against the commission of misconduct as per the provision under the clause of 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Orders to which the workman replied categorically. The absent itself is not a misconduct as stated by the workman in the WS. The workman was asked to appear before the Enquiry Committees set up to ascertain the root cause of the absence and to go to the bottom of the fact and to the extent of the alleged misconduct committed by the workman in which the workman concerned neither given opportunity to defend his case nor did allow him to give full facts before the Committee as stated by the workman. Thus the enquiry itself had been marred with violation of the natural justice and illegal. The contention of the Workman was never taken into consideration either by the Enquiry Officer or by the Disciplinary authority. The enquiry outcome is not fair and proper and in accordance of with the principle of the natural justice . At last the workman handed out the dismissal letter dated 20.11.1995 by the Competent Authority of the Bararee Colliery of M/s BCCL without giving an option of Second Show Cause Notice and providing a copy of the concluded enquiry report to the workman concerned. Post dismissal the workman made an fervent appeal to the management for reinstatement but to no avail which itself apparently a violation of the provision of the clause 30 the Certified Standing Order. The allegations, as came out by the Management were not established during the enquiry nor did workman's petition for prayer take into consideration before imposing harsher punishment of dismissal. So the alleged act of the Management about dismissal stands unjustified and arbitrary, thereby seeking reinstatement into service summarily.
3. It stands against the contrary to the fact that asserting by the Management at very beginning, ''as the I.D. is slate one, so the Union do not have locus-standi of raising the dispute after lapse of twenty years as of now, so the Reference is prime facie not maintainable in-law or facts without any cause of action as claimed by the Management categorically in its W.S. The workman concerned namely Dasrath Rabidas a permanent employee of Bararee Colliery under Lodna Area of M/s BCCL was absenting from duty since 16.03.1994 without any information and permission of the Management which constitutes a grave misconduct on his part of the workman. Though the workman was framed charge sheet against his misconduct asking for reply which was not found satisfactory leading to formation of Domestic Enquiry by Shri Lalan Pandey Dy. Personnel Manager Bararee Colliery as Enquiry Officer. The Committee held the workman guilty of the charges brought in against him as the workman hopelessly had been failure to prove innocence and the cause why he remained absent from duty since long without prior information and permission of the Management. So long as second Show Cause notice was issued to the concerned workman but reply was more or less unsatisfactory. Ultimately with the approval of the competent authority a dismissal letter had been issued to the workman and sent at his home address but the workman knowingly and deliberately refused to receive the same.
4. The said act on absentism on the part of the workman is attracted and termed as misconduct in accordance with clause 26.1.1. of the Certified Standing Order, an by-laws of the Management of the M/s BCCL. Though the Management came out with charge sheet of alleged being remained absentism for prolong period. Since reply remained unsatisfactory, leading to formation of Departmental Enquiry to go to bottom of the fact by the Disciplinary Authority solely in the line of the principle of natural justice. As the workman appeared before the238 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : JANUARY 13, 2018/PAUSHA 23, 1939 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] enquiry and submitted his reply to the said charge sheet. The issue, in quest, was referred the Domestic Enquiry to go to the bottom of the facts and the workman was held guilty of the charges brought against him during the enquiry proceedings. It is an extreme example of gross negligence on the part of the workman who later on turned habitual absentee that got deep rooted leading to his dismissal from service. The alleged act of dismissal from service by the Competent authority has been based on not merely singling out to a specific incident but taking into account the whole aspect of past attendances during his service career and other service relevant matters, too.
Finally, the Competent Authority came forward with handing out the dismissal letter dt. 20.11.1995 only after going through his past history of cases on absentism inclusive this one. Since the workman concerned kept on indulging himself in absentism and turned it into habitual practice with no sign of abating in spite of full force with which the Management did its best not to let the efforts and cohesion go in vain. Thus, neither there was any short of violation of the principle of natural justice, nor did it get mired at any stage as alleged by the petitioner/Union rather the alleged action of dismissal against the workman stands as fair, legal and justified.
5. Though there is nothing unusual and unprecedented event like this one grabbing the headlines since past of couple years as several hundred cases on the same footing happened in the Collieries earlier under the management of BCCL, opened up the whole fiasco between Management and workers over harsher punishment inflicted upon the workers. The work nature of the M/Loader is obviously arduous and tedious apart from the all time being in hale & hearty in physical structure too to work in the hazardous atmospheres under beneath of several fetes or more from the surface where quantum of oxygen sometimes reduces to drastically leading to causality or suffocation. So workman do not hesitate to proceed on prolonged leave even on slightest pretext of reasons on one score or another before stepping into the underground Mines despite safety mechanism in place by the Management. Notwithstanding so much so there was no deterrent to avert the tragic accident in the Mines, and for which mostly workmen are still afraid of. As such the move will not be called unjust and wrong-doings if the workman be provided one more opportunity to reform himself by way of a little breather of fresh appointment.
So it is ordered for fresh appointment of the workman concerned in the lowest grade on proof of his actual identity only with probation rolling over to two years and no back wages whatsoever.
R. K. SARAN, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
- द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते ↩
- ए ,rn~}kj घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूचि में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए: और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा। अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची ↩
- ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( ↩
- द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते ↩
- ए ,rn~}kjk घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:136) अनुसूचि में विनिzर्दष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के उपयोग का अधिकार अNर्जत किया जाए: और के न्6ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 3ए, यह निद(cid:129)श देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्6ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉप(cid:129)रेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगा। अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची ↩
- ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा की उपधारा ( ↩