Servants of Knowledge
Weekly Gazette of India · Government of India

Gazette contains multiple Subjects

Published 04 May 2019

Ministry
Gazette contains multiple Ministries/Organizations
Part
Part II-Section 3-Sub-Section(ii)
Reference
S O 648 to S O 690
Identifier
in.gazette.central.w.2019-05-04.203811
Languages
English, Hindi

रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05

REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05

प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

साप्ताहिक

WEEKLY

सं. 18] नई दिल्ली, अप्रैल 28—मई 4, 2019, शनिवार/वैशाख 8—वैशाख 14, 1941

इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके

Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation

भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं

Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India

(Other than the Ministry of Defence)

का(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मक,,,, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय

(का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग)

नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका.आ. .आ. .आ. .आ. 648648648648....————के न्(cid:13) सरकार एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अधिनियम संख्या 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए तमिलनाडू राज्य सरकार गृह (पुिलस XIII) विभाग के शासकीय आदेश (Ms). सं. 174 दिनांक 16.03.2019 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमित से भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. XLV) की धारा 354-ए, 354-बी तथा 392 व सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी अधिनियम, 2000, (2000 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. 21) की धारा 66-ई तथा तमिलनाडू महिला उत्पीड़न निषेध अधिनियम, 1998 (1998 का तमिलनाडू अधिनियम 44) अपराध संख्या 59/2019 तथा भारतीय दंड संहिता (1860 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. XLV) की धारा 341, 294 (बी), 323, 324 एवं 506 भाग-2 के अंतर्गत, अपराध संख्या 60/2019 में जिला कोयम्बटूर, पोलाची पूर्वी पुलिस थाना में दर्ज मामले की जांच करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का समस्त तमिलनाडू राज्य में विस्तार करती है ।

[फा. सं. 228/06/2019–एवीडी-II]

एस.पी.आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव

2204 GI/2019

(2565)

2566 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training)

New Delhi, the 25th April, 2019

S.O. 648.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police XIII) Department, vide Government Order G.O.(Ms).No. 174 dated 16.03.2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Tamil Nadu to investigate the case registered in Coimbatore District, Pollachi East Police Station Crime No.59/2019 under sections 354-A, 354-B and 392 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860) and section 66-E of Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) and section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 44 of 1998) and Crime No.60/2019 under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 Part 2 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).

S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.

विद्युतविद्युतविद्युतविद्युत मंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 649649649649....————कें (cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के िलए प्रयोग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप- िनयम (4) के अनुसरण में विद्युत मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन पावरRिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड के निम्निलिखत कार्यालयों िजनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृ ंद ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, को एतदद्वारा अिधसूिचत करती है:-

1. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

400/220 के वी पावगड़ा उपकें (cid:13),

क्यातंग-चेलू र् गांव, वेंकटमनाहल्ली-पोस्ट,

पावगड़ा, जिला तुमकू र, कर्नाटक-572136

2. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

765/400/220 के वी उपकें (cid:13),

वसंतनरसापुरा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया-2 व 3,

कें पनाडो[ेरी (पोस्ट), कोराहोब्ली,

तुमकू र तालुक व जिला, कर्नाटक-572128

3. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,

कु डगी 765/400 के वी जीआईएस उपकें (cid:13),

बीजापुर-अलमाटी राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग-50 का 275 किमी स्टोन,

बसवनबागेवाड़ी तालुक, बीजापुर-586121

[सं. 11011/9/2017-हिदी]

राज पाल, आ_थक सलाहकार

MINISTRY OF POWER

New Delhi, the 8th April, 2019

S.O. 649.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:

1. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., 400/220 KV Pavagada sub-station, Kyatagancherlu Village, Venkatamanahalli-Post, Pavagada-Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka -572136[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2567 2. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

765/400/220 KV Substation, Vasantanarsapura Industrial Area-2 & 3, Kempanadodderi (post), Kora hobli, Tumkur (TQ and Dt), Karnataka-572128

3. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,

Kudgi 765/400 KV GIS Substation, 275 km stone on Bijapur-Almati NH-50, Basavanbagewadi Taluk, Bijapur-586121

[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]

RAJ PAL, Economic Adviser

पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 650650650650....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पaात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया हैं) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1373 तारीख 5 सितम्बर 2018 जो भारत के राजपत्र,,,, प्रकाशित की गई थी द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में जिला नासिक में तालुका मालेगांव कोयली - अहमदनगर - सोलापुर पेट्रोलियम परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;;;;

और उक्त राजपत्र अधिनियम की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 01 दिसम्बर, 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;;;;

और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट की है ;;;;

और के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने, , , , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पaात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, , , , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिaय किया है ;;;;

अतः अब, , , , के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रlत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;;;;

और सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (4) द्वारा प्रlत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए, , , , यह निदmश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए, , , , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी ।

पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपू_त के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार के विop कोई वाद दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहq हो सके गी।

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

तालुका तालुका ----मालेगां तालुका तालुका मालेगांवववव मालेगां मालेगां िजला िजला ---- नािसक िजला िजला नािसक राज्य राज्य ---- महाराष्ट्र राज्य राज्य महाराष्ट्र
मौजे/$ाम सव%/ब्लॉक/सं (प्लॉट सं) सबसबसबसब----िडव िडव----संसंसंसं िडविडव क्षेत्रफल
हेक्टेयर आरआरआरआर वर्ग मीटर
1 2 3 4 5 6
जलगांव (निबयती) 87 86 82 84 81 80 79 74 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 28 46 04 11 52 34 31 39 14 16 33 38 80 51 48
72 65 590 591 589 593 595 599 598 597 579 578 552 553 559 558 520 519 517 516 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 24 26 11 03 29 25 12 07 21 34 41 22 49 34 09 08 08 51 32 15 63 81 34 68 73 16 11 18 09 16 21 23 11 58 22 18 37 33 81 89
2568 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओ-आर-I/ई-23678]

शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

New Delhi, the 3rd April, 2019

S. O. 650.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide S.O. No. 1373 dated the 5th September, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Malegaon in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;

And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 01st December 2018;

And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;

And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;

And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2569

Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.

SCHEDULE

Taluka:- Malegaon District:- Nashik State :- Maharashtra
Mauje / Village Survey/ Block No. Sub-Div-No. Area
Hectare Are Sq.mtr.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Jalgaon (Nimbait) 87 86 82 84 81 80 79 74 72 65 590 591 589 593 595 599 598 597 579 578 552 553 559 558 520 519 517 516 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 28 46 04 11 52 34 31 24 26 11 03 29 25 12 07 21 34 41 22 49 34 09 08 08 51 32 15 39 14 16 33 38 80 51 48 63 81 34 68 73 16 11 18 09 16 21 23 11 58 22 18 37 33 81 89

[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 22 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 651651651651....————पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भू-उपयोग अधिकार अधिRहण) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 के 50) के खrड 2 की धारा(क) के अनुसरण में तथा पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की दिनांक 21-5-2012 की अधिसूचना का॰आ॰1781 का अधिsमण करते -ए, कें (cid:13) सरकार एतtारा ,डीप्टी जिला कलेक्टर (नजफ़गढ़), राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली को अपने कर्तuों के अतिरिक्त राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली की सीमा मे हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड की एमडीपीएल उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के अंग के रूप में बहादुरगढ़ – टिकरिकलां स्परलाइंस के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के तहत सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृ त करती है ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2019-ओआर-I/ई-29584]

शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव2570 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 22nd April, 2019

S. O. 651.—In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) and in suppression of notification of the Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas No. S.O. 1781 dated 21-05-2012, the Central Government hereby authorizes, SDM (Najafgarh) Government of NCT Delhi, to perform the functions of Competent Authority for Bahadurgarh Tikrikalan spurlines as part of MDPL product Pipeline of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited in addition to his/her own duties, under the said Act, within the territory of NCT Delhi.

[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2019-OR-I/E-29584]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

नई दिल्ली, 23 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका.आ. .आ. .आ. .आ. 652652652652....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपsमों के निम्निलिखत कार्यालयों को, िजनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है:-

1. भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, रायपुर, एल.पी.जी. बॉटलिग प्लांट, Rाम – खपरी,

तहसील - तिल्दा, िजला – रायपुर,

िपन – 493116

[सं. 11011/1/2017(हिन्दी)]

ऊषा बिन्जोला, संयुक्त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019

S.O. 652.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more per cent of the staff have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-

1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Raipur LPG Bottling Plant, Village - Khapari, Tahsil – Tilda, District – Raipur, PIN - 493116

[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]

USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई दिल्ली, 23 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 653653653653....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपsमों के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, िजनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है :-

s.सं. कार्यालय/लोके शन का नाम
1. तलोजा ल्यूब कॉम्प्लेक्स इ ंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, विशेषता ल्यूब और योजक परिसर, प्लॉट सं. टी – 20, एमआईडीसी, तलोजा नवी मु ंबई – 410208 (महाराष्ट्र)
2. वडोदरा एलपीजी ट_मनल, इ ंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, वडोदरा – सावली रोड, पोस्ट – दुमाड, वडोदरा – 391749
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2571

3. मु ंबई मrडल कार्यालय,

इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड,

सार्जन प्लाज़ा,

100, डा. एनी बेसंट रोड, वर्ली,

मु ंबई – 400018

[सं. 11011/1/2017 (हिन्दी)]

ऊषा बिन्जोला, संयुक् त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)

New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019

S.O. 653.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more percent of the staff have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-

Sl. No. Name of Office/Location
1. Taloja Lube Complex Indian Oil Corporation Limited Visheshata Lube aur Yojak Parisar, Plot No. T-20, MIDC, Taloja Navi Mumbai – 410208 (Maharashtra)
2. Vadodara LPG Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vadodara Sawali Road, Post – Dumad, Vadodara-391749
3. Mumbai Circle Office, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sarzan Plaza, 100, Dr. Ani Besent Road, Worli, Mumbai - 400018

[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]

USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)

नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 654654654654....————पेट्रोलियम एवं खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन)अधिनियम, 1962, (1962 का 50) (इसमें इसके बाद उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में, भारत के असाधारण राजपत्र संख्या 370, दिनांक 13.02.2017 में प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्या 406 (अ), दिनांक 08.02.2017 में, भारत सरकार एतदद्वारा, संशोधन करती है तथा आंy प्रदेश राज्य में इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की पारादीप हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के लिए पेट्रोलियम एवं खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम, 1962 के तहत zी बी. वेंकटेशु को zी एम. आर.आर. शेषु के स्थान पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी के काय{ का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृ त करती है।

यह अधिसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से लागू होगी ।

[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]

शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S. O. 654.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), Government hereby, makes the amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. S.O. No 406 (E) dated 08.02.2017, published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India No. 370 dated 13.02.2017 and authorizes Shri B. Venkatesu vice Shri M.R.R. Seshu to perform the functions of Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 for Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project of Indian Oil Corporation Limited in the state of Andhra Pradesh.

This notification is applicable from the date of issue.

[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]

SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.

2572 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

कोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालय

नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल, 2019

काकाकाका....आआआआ. 655. 655. 655. 655....—के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पaात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 1704(अ), तारीख 10 मई, 2016 , जो भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप -खंड (ii), तारीख 11 मई, 201 6 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से उपाबp अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 912.7892 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.502 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवmक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी और उक्त सूचना 10 मई, 2018 से प्रारंभ होने वाली एक वर्ष की और अवधि को, अधिसूचना संख्या 1651(अ), तारीख 17 अप्रैल,2018 में अधिसूचित की गई थी ;

और, के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग से कोयला अभिप्राप्य किया जा सकता है ।

अत:, अब, के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए, इससे संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट 912.799 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।

टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 1111 : : : : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1, तारीख 28 दिसम्बर, 2018 का निरीक्षण महा प्रबंधक, नैनी क्षेत्र, दि सिगरेनी कोलियरीज़ कं पनी लिमिटेड (एक सरकारी कं पनी), एनएसी का एच. संख्या 129, मिzापाड़ा, िजला अंगुल-759122, ओडिशा या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700001 के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर और जिला मजिस्ट्रेट, िजला अंगुल, ओडिशा के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।

टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 2 :2 :2 :2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृ ष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें अर्जन की आपत्तियों के संबंध में निम्नलिखित उपबंध है :-

''8. )1 ( कोई uक्ति, जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना जारी की गई है, हितबp है, अिधसूचना जारी किए जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हq अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के संबंध में आपत्ति कर सके गा ।

स्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरण....---- इस धारा के अथा(cid:127)तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहq मानी जाएगी, कि कोई uक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संsियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संsियाएं के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार या किसी अन्य uक्ति को नहq करनी चाहिए ।

(2) उप-धारा (1) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी, आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि uवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पaात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदि कोई हो, करने के पaात् , जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोट(cid:127) के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार को उसके विनिaय के लिए देगा ।

(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह uक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबp समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अ_जत कर लिए जाते ।''

टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 3333 : : : : के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 3347(अ), तारीख 9 दिसम्बर, 2015, जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप -खंड (ii), में 10 दिसम्बर, 2015 को प्रकाशित की गयी थी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2573

अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची

सिसिसिसिगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड

नैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजना, , , , नैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्र

िजला अंगुलिजला अंगुलिजला अंगुलिजला अंगुल, , , , ओिडशा ओिडशा ओिडशा ओिडशा

[[[[रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1,,,,तारीख तारीख तारीख तारीख 22228888 दिसम्बरदिसम्बरदिसम्बरदिसम्बर, , , , 2012012012018 8 8 8 ] ] ] ]

(I)(I)(I)(I) सारणी सारणी सारणी सारणी

.सं. ाम का नाम थाना थाना संख्या िजला भूमि का प्रकार (हेक्टेयर में) जोड़, हेक्टेयर में जोड़, एकड़ में टिप्पणियां
अिभधृित वन गैर-वन सरकारी
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
1 कासीडीहा छ ेंदीपादा 95 अंगुल 0.961 9.805 0.750 11.516 28.457 भाग
2 तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर छ ेंदीपादा 94 अंगुल - 1.461 0.654 2.115 5.226 भाग
3 थलीपसी छ ेंदीपादा 101 अंगुल 20.555 4.207 3.052 27.814 68.730 भाग
4 बिम्बाधारापुर छ ेंदीपादा 102 अंगुल 35.724 51.101 8.873 95.698 236.475 पूर्ण
5 क ु डापासी छ ेंदीपादा 103 अंगुल 42.488 56.744 1.716 100.948 249.448 भाग
6 धौराखमान छ ेंदीपादा 104 अंगुल 12.099 16.862 2.652 31.613 78.117 भाग
7 छ ेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन छ ेंदीपादा - अंगुल 0.000 643.095 0.000 643.095 1589.122 भाग
जोड़ : 111.827 783.275 17.697 912.799 2255.575
जोड़ : 912.799 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग )

1. Rाम कासीडीहा में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:

1 से 16, 17(भाग), 20(भाग), 23(भाग), 24(भाग), 25 से 29, 30(भाग), 31, 32(भाग), 33(भाग), 34(भाग), 36(भाग), 3092(भाग), 3138, 3176.

2. Rाम तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्याक:

193(भाग), 194(भाग), 195(भाग), 196 से 199, 200(भाग), 201(भाग).

3. Rाम थलीपसी में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:

1 से 17, 18(भाग), 19(भाग), 20(भाग), 52(भाग), 53 से 62, 63(भाग), 64(भाग), 66(भाग), 67, 68(भाग), 69 से 118, 119(भाग), 120(भाग), 229(भाग), 233(भाग), 234(भाग), 235, 236, 237(भाग), 238(भाग), 239, 240, 241(भाग), 242(भाग), 243, 244, 245(भाग), 247(भाग), 250(भाग), 251 से 431, 432(भाग), 433(भाग), 434(भाग), 436(भाग), 437(भाग), 449(भाग), 471(भाग), 472(भाग), 473, 474, 475, 476(भाग), 477 से 545, 546(भाग), 547(भाग), 548(भाग), 549, 550(भाग), 551(भाग), 552(भाग), 553(भाग), 561(भाग), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.

4. Rाम बिम्बाधारापुर में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:

1 से 437.

5. Rाम कु डापासी में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:

1 से 460, 461(भाग), 462(भाग), 463 से 466, 467(भाग), 492(भाग), 499(भाग), 500(भाग), 501 से 522, 523(भाग), 527(भाग), 528, 529(भाग), 530(भाग), 531(भाग), 532 से 630, 631(भाग), 632(भाग), 633(भाग), 634(भाग), 635(भाग), 636 से 677, 678(भाग), 679(भाग), 680(भाग), 681(भाग), 682(भाग), 685(भाग), 686(भाग), 687(भाग), 688, 689(भाग), 690, 691(भाग), 692(भाग), 737(भाग), 738, 739, 740, 741(भाग), 769(भाग), 770 से 783, 784(भाग), 795(भाग), 796(भाग), 797(भाग), 802(भाग), 803(भाग), 804, 805, 806, 807(भाग), 809(भाग), 955(भाग), 956(भाग), 1223, 1224(भाग), 1225 से 1231, 1233 से 1297, 1300 से 1311, 1314, 1316 से 1322, 1324 से 1331, 1333 से 1363.

2574 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Rाम धराखमान में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:

1 से 19, 20(भाग), 21(भाग), 22 से 52, 53(भाग), 54(भाग), 84(भाग), 85(भाग), 86 से 101, 102(भाग), 103, 104, 105(भाग), 176(भाग), 178(भाग), 179(भाग), 180(भाग), 181(भाग), 182 से 212, 213(भाग), 214 से 221, 222(भाग), 223(भाग), 224(भाग), 225(भाग), 226(भाग), 255(भाग), 256(भाग), 257(भाग), 258, 259, 260(भाग), 261, 262(भाग), 265(भाग), 266(भाग), 267, 268(भाग), 269(भाग), 270(भाग), 550 से 553, 558 से 563, 566, 567, 570 से 572, 574, 575, 578 से 582, 584, 587 से 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.

(7) (7) (7) (7) छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन: 643.095 हेक्टेयर या 643.095 एकड़

अ_जत की जाने वाली भूमि का विवरण नीचे सारणी में दिया गया है:-

(II)(II)(II)(II) सारणीसारणीसारणीसारणी

(1) Rाम – कासीडीहा

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 कासीडीहा 44 3 चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य तैला 0.136
2 कासीडीहा 73 4 दसारथी सा- सुपुत्र पदमलवा सा- व अन्य तैला 0.176
3 कासीडीहा 167 5 महेश् वर सा- सुपुत्र दसारथी सा- व अन्य तैला 0.201
4 कासीडीहा 44 9 चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य पतीता 0.090
5 कासीडीहा 44 10 चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य पतीता 0.041
6 कासीडीहा 44 11 चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य पतीता 0.317
जोड़जोड़जोड़जोड़ : : : : $ाम $ाम : : : : कासीडीहा $ाम $ाम कासीडीहा 0.961

(2) Rाम – थलीपसी

गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)

s.सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 थलीपसी 8 2 िखरमोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.607
2 थलीपसी 46/5 3 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिष्णु चरण सा तैला 0.133
3 थलीपसी 45 4 सुदर्शन नायक सुपुत्र दिबाकर और अन्य पतीता 0.061
4 थलीपसी 45 5 सुदर्शन नायक सुपुत्र दिबाकर और अन्य तैला 0.178
5 थलीपसी 21 6 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य पतीता 0.101
6 थलीपसी 21 7 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य पतीता 0.174
7 थलीपसी 21 8 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.243
8 थलीपसी 21 9 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.174
9 थलीपसी 21 10 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य पतीता 0.049
10 थलीपसी 43 12 संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य पतीता 0.118
11 थलीपसी 43 13 संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य पतीता 0.510
12 थलीपसी 43 14 संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य पतीता 0.049
13 थलीपसी 14 15 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.542
14 थलीपसी 14 16 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.257
15 थलीपसी 14 17 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य पतीता 0.047
16 थलीपसी 14 18 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.198
17 थलीपसी 14 19 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.003
18 थलीपसी 21 52 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.067
19 थलीपसी 21 53 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.105
20 थलीपसी 21 54 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.105
21 थलीपसी 21 55 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.032
22 थलीपसी 21 56 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
23 थलीपसी 21 57 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.031
24 थलीपसी 21 58 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
25 थलीपसी 21 59 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.033
26 थलीपसी 21 60 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.040
27 थलीपसी 21 61 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
28 थलीपसी 21 62 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.038
29 थलीपसी 21 63 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
30 थलीपसी 17 64 डालगोबोंडा माझी सुपुत्र मौलमानी माझी सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.106
31 थलीपसी 7 66 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य तैला 0.028
32 थलीपसी 7 67 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.122
33 थलीपसी 7 68 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
34 थलीपसी 7 69 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य तैला 0.046
35 थलीपसी 7 70 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.051
36 थलीपसी 7 71 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.091
37 थलीपसी 7 72 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.054
38 थलीपसी 7 73 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य तैला 0.040
39 थलीपसी 13 74 जोगी सा सुपुत्र बंछा सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.091
40 थलीपसी 7 75 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.178
41 थलीपसी 7 76 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य तैला 0.091
42 थलीपसी 20 79 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.199
43 थलीपसी 20 80 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.059
44 थलीपसी 38 81 बुधिया माझी सुपुत्र नाबागाना माझी तैला 0.221
45 थलीपसी 20 87 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.460
46 थलीपसी 20 88 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.053
47 थलीपसी 6 91 कान् सा सुपुत्र आरता सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.040
48 थलीपसी 6 92 कान् सा सुपुत्र आरता सा तैला 0.247
49 थलीपसी 27 95 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.353
50 थलीपसी 32 96 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य । तैला 0.412
51 थलीपसी 25 97 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.015
52 थलीपसी 25 98 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.012
53 थलीपसी 25 99 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.024
54 थलीपसी 25 100 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.025
55 थलीपसी 46/6 101 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.072
56 थलीपसी 30 102 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.190
57 थलीपसी 33 103 भागाबत गोसा सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.031
58 थलीपसी 46/4 105 जसबंत प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगीनाथ प्रधान और अन्य घाराबरी 0.117
59 थलीपसी 9 106 गिरिश चन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य घाराबरी 0.119
60 थलीपसी 25 107 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान घाराबरी 0.103
61 थलीपसी 44 108 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
62 थलीपसी 46/6 109 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
63 थलीपसी 37 110 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
64 थलीपसी 30 111 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.158
65 थलीपसी 6 112 कान सा सुपुत्र अराता सा घाराबरी 0.146
66 थलीपसी 22 115 पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य घाराबरी 0.087
67 थलीपसी 6 116 कान सा सुपुत्र अराता सा घाराबरी 0.077
68 थलीपसी 21 117 पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य घाराबरी 0.102
69 थलीपसी 21 118 पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य घाराबरी 0.090
70 थलीपसी 25 233 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.002
71 थलीपसी 39 234 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारान प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.111
72 थलीपसी 39 235 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारान प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.104
73 थलीपसी 15 236 दिबाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.052
74 थलीपसी 39 237 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.057
75 थलीपसी 39 238 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.037
76 थलीपसी 39 239 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.056
77 थलीपसी 39 240 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
78 थलीपसी 39 241 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
79 थलीपसी 39 242 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.013
80 थलीपसी 39 243 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.052
81 थलीपसी 39 244 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.045
82 थलीपसी 15 245 दिबाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.003
83 थलीपसी 39 247 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.060
84 थलीपसी 46/3 250 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
85 थलीपसी 25 251 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
86 थलीपसी 25 252 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
87 थलीपसी 46/6 253 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
88 थलीपसी 46/6 254 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.017
89 थलीपसी 44 255 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
90 थलीपसी 9 256 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.027
91 थलीपसी 9 257 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.016
92 थलीपसी 37 258 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.048
93 थलीपसी 46/3 259 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
94 थलीपसी 25 260 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.018
95 थलीपसी 9 261 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.025
96 थलीपसी 25 262 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
97 थलीपसी 9 263 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
98 थलीपसी 25 264 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
99 थलीपसी 9 265 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
100 थलीपसी 46/3 266 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
101 थलीपसी 44 267 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.027
102 थलीपसी 46/6 268 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
103 थलीपसी 37 269 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.017
104 थलीपसी 44 270 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.014
105 थलीपसी 37 271 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
106 थलीपसी 46/6 272 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.061
107 थलीपसी 46/3 273 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.049
108 थलीपसी 46/3 274 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.020
109 थलीपसी 9 275 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
110 थलीपसी 46/3 276 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.050
111 थलीपसी 25 277 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.063
112 थलीपसी 9 278 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.044
113 थलीपसी 37 279 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.031
114 थलीपसी 46/6 280 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
115 थलीपसी 46/6 281 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.052
116 थलीपसी 37 282 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.070
117 थलीपसी 44 283 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.067
118 थलीपसी 46/6 284 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
119 थलीपसी 37 285 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.014
120 थलीपसी 37 286 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.029
121 थलीपसी 9 287 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
122 थलीपसी 25 288 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
123 थलीपसी 46/3 289 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
124 थलीपसी 37 290 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.053
125 थलीपसी 44 291 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
126 थलीपसी 44 292 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
127 थलीपसी 44 293 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
128 थलीपसी 46/6 294 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.035
129 थलीपसी 44 295 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.049
130 थलीपसी 44 296 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.038
131 थलीपसी 37 297 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.088
132 थलीपसी 37 298 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.040
133 थलीपसी 46/6 299 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
134 थलीपसी 46/6 300 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
135 थलीपसी 44 301 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.075
136 थलीपसी 37 302 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.068
137 थलीपसी 46/6 303 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.046
138 थलीपसी 46/6 304 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
139 थलीपसी 44 305 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.038
140 थलीपसी 25 306 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
141 थलीपसी 25 307 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.033
142 थलीपसी 25 308 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
143 थलीपसी 25 309 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.058
144 थलीपसी 25 310 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.044
145 थलीपसी 25 311 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.046
146 थलीपसी 25 312 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.058
147 थलीपसी 25 313 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
148 थलीपसी 25 314 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.045
149 थलीपसी 25 315 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
150 थलीपसी 25 316 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
151 थलीपसी 46/3 321 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.055
152 थलीपसी 9 322 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
153 थलीपसी 9 323 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.054
154 थलीपसी 9 324 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.049
155 थलीपसी 9 325 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.060
156 थलीपसी 9 326 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.048
157 थलीपसी 9 327 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.047
158 थलीपसी 9 328 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.049
159 थलीपसी 9 329 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
160 थलीपसी 9 330 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.031
161 थलीपसी 46/6 331 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
162 थलीपसी 36 332 बीरबर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.019
163 थलीपसी 46/3 333 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.015
164 थलीपसी 46/3 334 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.033
165 थलीपसी 46/3 335 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
166 थलीपसी 46/3 336 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.044
167 थलीपसी 46/3 337 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
168 थलीपसी 46/3 338 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.119
169 थलीपसी 46/3 339 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.064
170 थलीपसी 46/3 340 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.045
171 थलीपसी 37 341 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
172 थलीपसी 37 342 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.021
173 थलीपसी 46/6 344 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.025
174 थलीपसी 46/6 345 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.035
175 थलीपसी 46/6 346 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.066
176 थलीपसी 37 347 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.102
177 थलीपसी 44 348 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
178 थलीपसी 44 349 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.039
179 थलीपसी 37 350 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.075
180 थलीपसी 37 351 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.076
181 थलीपसी 44 352 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.145
182 थलीपसी 46/6 353 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.102
183 थलीपसी 46/6 354 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.083
184 थलीपसी 37 355 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.076
185 थलीपसी 46/6 356 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.032
186 थलीपसी 44 357 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.029
187 थलीपसी 44 358 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
188 थलीपसी 44 359 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.041
189 थलीपसी 37 360 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.018
190 थलीपसी 37 361 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
191 थलीपसी 37 362 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.035
192 थलीपसी 46/6 363 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.063
193 थलीपसी 46/6 364 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.038
194 थलीपसी 46/6 365 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.056
195 थलीपसी 46/3 367 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
196 थलीपसी 9 369 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.025
197 थलीपसी 9 370 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.020
198 थलीपसी 25 371 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.051
199 थलीपसी 46/3 372 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.083
200 थलीपसी 25 373 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.040
201 थलीपसी 9 374 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
202 थलीपसी 9 375 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.016
203 थलीपसी 25 376 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.012
204 थलीपसी 46/3 377 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.029
205 थलीपसी 46/3 378 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
206 थलीपसी 25 379 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
207 थलीपसी 9 380 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
208 थलीपसी 9 381 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
209 थलीपसी 25 382 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
210 थलीपसी 46/3 383 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.019
211 थलीपसी 46/3 384 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.029
212 थलीपसी 25 385 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.024
213 थलीपसी 9 386 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.024
214 थलीपसी 9 387 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
215 थलीपसी 25 388 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
216 थलीपसी 46/3 389 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.021
217 थलीपसी 46/3 390 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.031
218 थलीपसी 25 391 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.031
219 थलीपसी 9 392 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
220 थलीपसी 9 393 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
221 थलीपसी 25 394 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
222 थलीपसी 46/3 395 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
223 थलीपसी 46/3 396 जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.029
224 थलीपसी 25 397 प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.032
225 थलीपसी 9 398 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
226 थलीपसी 9 399 गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.013
227 थलीपसी 37 400 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.028
228 थलीपसी 37 401 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.106
229 थलीपसी 44 402 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.064
230 थलीपसी 44 403 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.046
231 थलीपसी 44 404 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.047
232 थलीपसी 46/6 405 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.096
233 थलीपसी 46/6 406 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.078
234 थलीपसी 44 407 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.083
235 थलीपसी 46/6 408 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.108
236 थलीपसी 37 409 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.111
237 थलीपसी 37 410 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.100
238 थलीपसी 46/6 411 चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.105
239 थलीपसी 44 412 सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.088
240 थलीपसी 37 413 बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.118
241 थलीपसी 14 417 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.128
242 थलीपसी 14 421 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.092
243 थलीपसी 14 422 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.042
244 थलीपसी 14 423 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.090
245 थलीपसी 14 424 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य जलाश्य एक 0.014
246 थलीपसी 14 425 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य घारीबारी 0.086
247 थलीपसी 14 426 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.030
248 थलीपसी 14 427 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.054
249 थलीपसी 14 428 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
250 थलीपसी 14 429 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.020
251 थलीपसी 14 430 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.017
252 थलीपसी 14 431 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.076
253 थलीपसी 14 432 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.036
254 थलीपसी 14 433 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
255 थलीपसी 14 434 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.027
256 थलीपसी 14 436 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.001
257 थलीपसी 14 437 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.005
258 थलीपसी 14 472 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.009
259 थलीपसी 14 473 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
260 थलीपसी 14 474 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.006
261 थलीपसी 14 475 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.026
262 थलीपसी 14 476 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.012
263 थलीपसी 14 477 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
264 थलीपसी 14 478 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.013
265 थलीपसी 14 479 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.019
266 थलीपसी 14 480 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.016
267 थलीपसी 14 481 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.021
268 थलीपसी 14 482 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.024
269 थलीपसी 14 483 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.056
270 थलीपसी 18 495 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.034
271 थलीपसी 46/10 500 दिगम्बर सा सुपुत्र रतनाकर सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.047
272 थलीपसी 2 501 उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.038
273 थलीपसी 3 502 कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.044
274 थलीपसी 42 503 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.055
275 थलीपसी 3 510 कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.126
276 थलीपसी 2 511 उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.111
277 थलीपसी 42 512 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.062
278 थलीपसी 40 513 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.048
279 थलीपसी 23 514 प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.051
280 थलीपसी 3 515 कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.063
281 थलीपसी 2 516 उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.092
282 थलीपसी 12 522 गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.190
283 थलीपसी 18 523 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.080
284 थलीपसी 18 524 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.086
285 थलीपसी 18 525 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.088
286 थलीपसी 18 526 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.050
287 थलीपसी 18 527 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.058
288 थलीपसी 12 528 नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.080
289 थलीपसी 23 529 प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.023
290 थलीपसी 40 530 मदन सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.022
291 थलीपसी 3 531 कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.040
292 थलीपसी 2 532 उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.043
293 थलीपसी 11 533 गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.024
294 थलीपसी 11 534 गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.044
295 थलीपसी 24 535 प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -र सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.019
296 थलीपसी 24 536 प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -र सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.027
297 थलीपसी 10 539 गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.070
298 थलीपसी 10 540 गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.051
299 थलीपसी 10 543 गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.169
300 थलीपसी 10 544 गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.171
301 थलीपसी 10 548 गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.044
302 थलीपसी 14 549 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमावलो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.050
303 थलीपसी 20 550 नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.018
304 थलीपसी 14 551 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमलावो सा और अन्य पतीता 0.096
305 थलीपसी 20 552 नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.036
306 थलीपसी 20 553 नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.015
307 थलीपसी 14 561 दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमलावो सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली 0.001
308 थलीपसी 20 569 नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली 0.019
309 थलीपसी 20 570 नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.216
310 थलीपसी 46/5 576 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.487
311 थलीपसी 46/5 577 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.140
312 थलीपसी 46/5 578 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा पतीता 0.013
313 थलीपसी 30 579 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य घाराबारी 0.132
314 थलीपसी 30 580 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य घाराबारी 0.121
315 थलीपसी 46/7 581 मनोज कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान तैला 0.028
316 थलीपसी 46/8 582 क ु मुदा प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान तैला 0.046
317 थलीपसी 46/9 583 छबीला कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान तैला 0.039
जोड़ : 20.555
(3) Rाम – बिम्बाधारापुर गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s.सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 6 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 1.150
2 बिम्बाधारापुर 16 7 िनसामिण सडांगी पत् नी बालकृ ष्ण सडांगी तैला 0.387
3 बिम्बाधारापुर 16 8 िनसामिण सडांगी पत् नी बालकृ ष्ण सडांगी तैला 0.419
4 िबम्बाधारापुर 22 12 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.147
5 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 13 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.157
6 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 14 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.456
7 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 15 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.132
8 बिम्बाधारापुर 29 16 सरोज नायक सुपुत्र सरदार नायक और अन्य तैला 0.104
9 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 18 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.274
10 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 20 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.226
11 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/5 21 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.146
12 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/34 22 सिसिर कु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र कालिया बेहेरा तैला 0.139
13 बिम्बाधारापुर 10 23 त्रिनाथ नायक सुपुत्र बेड़ा नायक और अन्य तैला 0.056
14 बिम्बाधारापुर 7 29 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य तैला 0.113
15 बिम्बाधारापुर 7 30 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य तैला 0.232
16 बिम्बाधारापुर 27 31 रा नायक सुपुत्र कालिया नायक और अन्य तैला 0.584
17 बिम्बाधारापुर 20 32 िबकाला बाघ सुपुत्र मुलई बाघ और अन्य तैला 0.505
18 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/9 33 उमा नायक पी कल्याण नायक तैला 0.515
19 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 39 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.030
20 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 40 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.026
21 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 41 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.051
22 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 44 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.043
23 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 45 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.028
24 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 46 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.020
25 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 47 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.091
26 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 48 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.044
27 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 49 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.063
28 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 50 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.084
29 बिम्बाधारापुर 17 51 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.082
30 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 52 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.079
31 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 53 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.069
32 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 54 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.038
33 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 55 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.048
34 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 56 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.052
35 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 57 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा सारदा 0.032
और अन्य जलसािचता एक फसली
36 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 58 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.057
37 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 59 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
38 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 60 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहादेब प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.274
39 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 61 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.123
40 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 62 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.121
41 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/8 63 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.279
42 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 64 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.105
43 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 65 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.106
44 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 66 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.109
45 बिम्बाधारापुर 8 67 जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.401
46 बिम्बाधारापुर 1 78 कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान तैला 0.079
47 बिम्बाधारापुर 1 80 कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.130
48 बिम्बाधारापुर 1 81 कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान तैला 0.270
49 बिम्बाधारापुर 31 82 zीनिबास नायक सुपुत्र बल्का नायक तैला 0.308
50 िबम्बाधारापुर 34/17 83 सरोज कु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र रघुनाथ बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.220
51 बिम्बाधारापुर 7 84 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य तैला 0.157
52 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/7 105 सत्यनारायण सा सुपुत्र भाजामन सा तैला 0.342
53 बिम्बाधारापुर 14 106 दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य तैला 0.119
54 बिम्बाधारापुर 14 107 दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य तैला 0.180
55 बिम्बाधारापुर 14 108 दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य तैला 0.136
56 बिम्बाधारापुर 26 114 महेर सा सुपुत्र दसरथी सा और अन्य तैला 0.517
57 बिम्बाधारापुर 30 116 सरांगाधर सा सुपुत्र बंगुरू सा तैला 0.294
58 बिम्बाधारापुर 9 121 दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.288
59 बिम्बाधारापुर 34 123 हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य तैला 0.222
60 बिम्बाधारापुर 34 128 हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.220
61 बिम्बाधारापुर 34 129 हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.092
62 बिम्बाधारापुर 34 130 हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.043
63 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 131 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.188
64 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 132 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा तैला 0.163
65 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 133 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.064
66 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 134 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.016
67 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 135 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.071
68 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 136 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.092
69 बिम्बाधारापुर 5 137 खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा तैला 0.434
70 बिम्बाधारापुर 3 139 किशोरी प्रधान सुपुत्र नाता प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.614
71 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 150 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.060
72 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 151 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.045
73 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 152 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.061
74 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 153 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.037
75 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 154 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.030
76 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 156 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.322
77 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 157 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.104
78 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 158 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.130
79 बिम्बाधारापुर 33 159 हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.160
80 बिम्बाधारापुर 19 160 भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 1.238
81 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 166 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नाराना प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.726
82 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 168 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.095
83 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 169 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.085
84 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 173 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.019
85 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 174 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.048
86 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 175 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.099
87 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 176 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.124
88 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 177 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
89 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 178 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.019
90 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 179 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.018
91 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 180 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
92 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 181 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.026
93 बिम्बाधारापुर 25 182 भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान तैला 0.062
94 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 183 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.087
95 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 184 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.077
96 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 185 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान तैला 0.076
97 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 186 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.100
98 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 187 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.121
99 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 188 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.075
100 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 189 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.072
101 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 190 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.090
102 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 191 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.100
103 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 192 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.091
104 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 193 भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.113
105 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 194 भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.133
106 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 195 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान तैला 0.214
107 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 196 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नाराना प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.008
108 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 197 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.051
109 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 198 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.050
110 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 199 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.046
111 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 200 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.046
112 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 201 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
113 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 202 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.045
114 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 203 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.072
115 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 204 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.029
116 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 205 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
117 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 206 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.069
118 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 207 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.027
119 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 208 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
120 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 209 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
121 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 210 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.028
122 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 211 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.083
123 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 212 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.049
124 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 213 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.036
125 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 214 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.041
126 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 215 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
127 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 216 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.048
128 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 217 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
129 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 218 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.043
130 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 219 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.021
131 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 220 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.024
132 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 221 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.029
133 बिम्बाधारापुर 22 222 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.060
134 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 223 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.027
135 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 224 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.045
136 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 225 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.423
137 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 226 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
138 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 227 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
139 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 228 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.037
140 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 229 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.031
141 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 230 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.034
142 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 231 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.045
143 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 232 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.052
144 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 233 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.041
145 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 234 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
146 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 235 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.032
147 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 236 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.035
148 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 237 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.153
149 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 238 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.039
150 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 239 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.041
151 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 240 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.045
152 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 241 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.035
153 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 242 भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.140
154 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 243 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.143
155 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 244 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.137
156 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 245 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.118
157 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 246 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.116
158 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 247 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.111
159 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 248 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.115
160 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 249 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.047
161 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 250 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.047
162 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 251 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.092
163 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 252 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.082
164 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 253 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.074
165 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 254 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.069
166 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 255 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर सारदा 0.111
प्रधान और अन्य जलसािचता एक फसली
167 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/21 256 जनक दे-रे सुपुत्र मुलई दे-रे सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.120
168 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 257 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.249
169 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 258 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.059
170 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 259 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.015
171 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 260 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.009
172 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 261 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.016
173 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 262 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.018
174 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 263 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.053
175 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 264 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.041
176 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 265 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.227
177 िबम्बाधारापुर 2 266 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.087
178 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 267 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.101
179 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 268 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.115
180 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 269 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.105
181 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 270 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.070
182 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 271 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और सारदा जलसािचता एक 0.038
अन्य फसली
183 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 272 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.091
184 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 273 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.098
185 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 274 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.092
186 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 275 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.070
187 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 276 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.107
188 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 277 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.024
189 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 278 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.025
190 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 279 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.023
191 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 280 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.078
192 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 281 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.023
193 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 282 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.023
194 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 283 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.019
195 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 284 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.023
196 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 285 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.039
197 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 286 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.033
198 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 287 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.044
199 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 288 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.049
200 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 289 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
201 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 290 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.052
202 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 291 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.052
203 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 292 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
204 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 293 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.015
205 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 294 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.018
206 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 295 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.022
207 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 296 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.020
208 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 297 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.107
209 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 298 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.110
210 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 299 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.110
211 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 300 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.062
212 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 301 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.093
213 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 302 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.067
214 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 303 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.051
215 बिम्बाधारापुर 11 304 त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.160
216 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 305 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.035
217 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 306 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.129
218 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 307 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.165
219 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 308 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.159
220 िबम्बाधारापुर 23 309 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.158
221 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 312 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.049
222 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 313 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.056
223 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 314 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.040
224 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 315 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.045
225 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 316 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.040
226 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 317 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.043
227 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 318 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.041
228 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 319 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.026
229 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 320 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.057
230 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 321 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.037
231 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 322 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.037
232 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 323 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.039
233 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 324 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.081
234 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 325 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.078
235 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 326 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.070
236 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 327 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान । तैला 0.210
237 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 328 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.171
238 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 333 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान । तैला 0.161
239 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 334 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.123
240 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 335 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.056
241 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 336 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.119
242 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 337 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.179
243 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 338 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.171
244 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 339 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.114
245 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 340 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.086
246 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 341 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.044
247 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 342 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.028
248 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 343 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.022
249 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 344 क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.022
250 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 345 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.044
251 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 346 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.034
252 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 347 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.027
253 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 348 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.030
254 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 349 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.027
255 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 350 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.029
256 बिम्बाधारापुर 6 351 गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.051
257 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 352 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.112
258 बिम्बाधारापुर 9 353 दामबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नितयानंद प्रधान तैला 0.146
259 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 354 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
260 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 355 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.065
261 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 356 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.027
262 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 357 बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.076
263 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 358 बैब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.071
264 बिम्बाधारापुर 23 359 बैब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.099
265 बिम्बाधारापुर 9 360 दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.013
266 बिम्बाधारापुर 9 361 दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान तैला 0.049
267 बिम्बाधारापुर 15 366 नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.065
268 बिम्बाधारापुर 24 367 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.394
269 बिम्बाधारापुर 24 368 बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.022
270 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 369 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.277
271 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 370 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.079
272 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 371 िखरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.066
273 बिम्बाधारापुर 4 372 खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य तैला 0.158
274 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 377 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.172
275 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 378 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.203
276 बिम्बाधारापुर 21 379 बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.048
277 बिम्बाधारापुर 18 381 भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन् य तैला 0.403
278 बिम्बाधारापुर 2 382 क ं धुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन् य तैला 0.308
279 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/5 395 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.769
280 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/2 396 भोलेश् वर सा सुपुत्र बगुरू सा तैला 0.362
281 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/4 397 बीनोदिनी रैऊता पत् नी वैश् नब रैऊता तैला 0.320
282 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/6 398 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.345
283 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/8 399 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.240
284 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/11 401 गंधरबा नायक सुपुत्र कु रतारथा नायक तैला 0.267
285 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/11 402 गंधरबा नायकसुपुत्र कु रतारथा नायक तैला 0.151
286 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/12 403 र ंजनकु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र कं दारपा बेहेरा तैला 0.159
287 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 404 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.051
288 िबम्बाधारापुर 34/10 405 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.053
289 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 406 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.038
290 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 407 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.029
291 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 408 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.040
292 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 409 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा तैला 0.081
293 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/10 410 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.110
294 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/13 411 अरूण कु मार नायक सुपुत्र हरिहारा नायक तैला 0.090
295 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/14 412 सिबता सा पत् नी जागाबंधु सा तैला 0.055
296 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/15 413 हाताकिसोरा प्रधान सुपुत्र दयानिधि प्रधान तैला 0.019
297 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/16 414 सानतना बागा सुपुत्र खिती बागा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.077
298 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/18 415 सारथी सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा तैला 0.038
299 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/19 416 भागाबत सा सुपुत्र बाला सा सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.016
300 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/20 417 िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा ओर अन् य तैला 0.116
301 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/22 418 धमेन् सा सुपुत्र रबिन् सा तैला 0.108
302 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/23 419 मनोज कु मार सा सुपुत्र राज सा तैला 0.062
303 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/24 420 र ंजीता प्रधानसुपुत्र हरमोहन प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.011
304 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/24 421 र ंजीता प्रधानसुपुत्र हरमोहन प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.014
305 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/25 422 िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य तैला 0.183
306 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/25 423 िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य तैला 0.106
307 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/25 424 िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य तैला 0.044
308 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/28 425 तुकाना नायक सुपुत्र दिलासवर नायक तैला 0.047
309 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/26 426 प्रफू ल कु मार सेठी सुपुत्र बौरीबंधु सेठी तैला 0.049
310 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/27 427 क ु न्तला बहेरा पी सुचीदानंदा बहेरा तैला 0.033
311 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/29 428 बीनापानी प्रधान पी कल्पासवर सा तैला 0.179
312 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/30 429 गंगाधर बागा सुपुत्र बिकाल बागा तैला 0.017
313 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/31 430 धीरेन् बागा सुपुत्र बिकल बागा तैला 0.017
314 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/32 431 सुलोचना महाकु दा पी बिध्याधर महाकु दा तैला 0.020
315 बिम्बाधारापुर 34/33 432 र ेबती रऊता पी तनुचन् ा रऊता तैला 0.020
जोड़ : 35.724
(4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी )
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 क ु डापासी 114/27 3 zीमता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.291
2 क ु डापासी 12 4 क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरंगी नायक तैला 0.279
3 क ु डापासी 111 6 सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे तैला 0.181
4 क ु डापासी 111 7 सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे तैला 0.072
5 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 111 8 सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे तैला 0.105
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
6 क ु डापासी 111 9 सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे तैला 0.122
7 क ु डापासी 107 23 zीराम सिथे सुपुत्र दुखु सिथे तैला 0.088
8 क ु डापासी 94 41 रूमा माझी सुपुत्री भागबन माझी तैला 0.123
9 क ु डापासी 94 42 रूमा माझी सुपुत्री भागबन माझी तैला 1.011
10 क ु डापासी 102 43 श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी तैला 0.161
11 क ु डापासी 102 44 श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी तैला 0.107
12 क ु डापासी 102 45 श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी तैला 0.081
13 क ु डापासी 102 46 श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी पतीता 0.043
14 क ु डापासी 68 48 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी पतीता 0.032
15 क ु डापासी 68 49 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.086
16 क ु डापासी 68 50 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.022
17 क ु डापासी 68 51 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.040
18 क ु डापासी 68 57 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.022
19 क ु डापासी 68 58 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.022
20 क ु डापासी 68 59 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.022
21 क ु डापासी 68 60 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.028
22 क ु डापासी 68 61 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.026
23 क ु डापासी 68 64 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.057
24 क ु डापासी 68 65 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.026
25 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 68 66 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.068
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
26 क ु डापासी 68 67 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी पतीता 0.052
27 क ु डापासी 68 76 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.038
28 क ु डापासी 68 77 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी 0.082
29 क ु डापासी 68 78 फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी पतीता 0.145
30 क ु डापासी 16 79 खागेर माझी सुपुत्र बागबन माझी तैला 0.695
31 क ु डापासी 16 80 खागेर माझी सुपुत्र बागबन माझी तैला 0.227
32 क ु डापासी 77 81 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा तैला 0.308
33 क ु डापासी 50 83 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा तैला 0.307
34 क ु डापासी 114 84 हडी सा सुपुत्र ◌ंगंगाधर सा तैला 0.315
35 क ु डापासी 66 98 प्राणबंधु सा सुपुत्र पंचू सा तैला 0.071
36 क ु डापासी 66 99 प्राणबंधु सा सुपुत्र पंचू सा तैला 0.101
37 क ु डापासी 114/27 103 zीमाता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.420
38 क ु डापासी 40 104 नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा तैला 0.282
39 क ु डापासी 13 107 क े साबा सा सुपुत्र कु ं गई सा तैला 0.080
40 क ु डापासी 40 109 नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा तैला 0.205
41 क ु डापासी 114/33 115 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.275
42 क ु डापासी 114/40 116 मनमोहन प्रधान सुपुत्र गदाधर प्रधान तैला 0.046
43 क ु डापासी 114/8 117 पंचाली बारिक पी प्रभारत किरन बारिक तैला 0.085
44 क ु डापासी 87 122 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली 0.075
45 क ु डापासी 87 123 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली 0.157
46 क ु डापासी 87 125 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा तैला 0.164
47 क ु डापासी 87 126 महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा तैला 0.143
48 क ु डापासी 72 128 बलराम माझी सुपुत्र चैतन्या माझी और अन्य तैला 0.175
49 क ु डापासी 73 133 बसुदेव सा सुपुत्र नंदा सा और अन्य तैला 0.449
50 क ु डापासी 43 136 नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा तैला 0.100
51 क ु डापासी 25 137 चौधरी सा सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा सा और अन्य तैला 0.164
52 क ु डापासी 43 138 नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा तैला 0.083
53 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 30 142 जोगी माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी और तैला 0.527
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
अन्य
54 क ु डापासी 30 143 जोगी माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी और अन्य तैला 0.048
55 क ु डापासी 84 144 भागीरथी माझी सुपुत्र बीरा माझी और अन्य तैला 0.420
56 क ु डापासी 81 166 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.756
57 क ु डापासी 39 179 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली 0.216
58 क ु डापासी 39 180 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.024
59 क ु डापासी 39 181 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.009
60 क ु डापासी 39 182 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.131
61 क ु डापासी 39 183 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.009
62 क ु डापासी 39 184 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.177
63 क ु डापासी 39 185 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य भागायत देई 0.062
64 क ु डापासी 39 187 नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.043
65 क ु डापासी 79 189 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.030
66 क ु डापासी 79 190 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.045
67 क ु डापासी 79 191 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.017
68 क ु डापासी 79 192 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.017
69 क ु डापासी 79 194 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.383
70 क ु डापासी 79 195 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.197
71 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 79 196 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.169
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
72 क ु डापासी 75 197 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.018
73 क ु डापासी 79 198 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.014
74 क ु डापासी 79 199 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.014
75 क ु डापासी 79 200 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.206
76 क ु डापासी 79 201 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.315
77 क ु डापासी 79 202 बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.675
78 क ु डापासी 23 204 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.016
79 क ु डापासी 114/65 206 बिनाथ सेठी सुपुत्र कै लाश सेठी तैला 0.145
80 क ु डापासी 1 215 अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.232
81 क ु डापासी 75 222 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.040
82 क ु डापासी 74 224 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.042
83 क ु डापासी 74 225 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.137
84 क ु डापासी 75 226 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.061
85 क ु डापासी 75 227 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.195
86 क ु डापासी 75 229 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.030
87 क ु डापासी 75 231 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.031
88 क ु डापासी 75 232 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.113
89 क ु डापासी 75 233 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.016
90 क ु डापासी 75 234 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.066
91 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 81 235 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.040
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
92 क ु डापासी 81 236 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.039
93 क ु डापासी 75 237 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.044
94 क ु डापासी 81 240 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.045
95 क ु डापासी 81 241 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.020
96 क ु डापासी 81 242 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.150
97 क ु डापासी 81 243 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पपीता 0.008
98 क ु डापासी 81 244 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.086
99 क ु डापासी 81 245 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.098
100 क ु डापासी 81 246 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.012
101 क ु डापासी 81 247 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.010
102 क ु डापासी 81 248 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.072
103 क ु डापासी 81 249 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.079
104 क ु डापासी 81 253 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.116
105 क ु डापासी 81 254 बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.025
106 क ु डापासी 75 260 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.181
107 क ु डापासी 75 263 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.151
108 क ु डापासी 75 265 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.013
109 क ु डापासी 75 266 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य पतीता 0.012
110 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 75 267 बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.160
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
111 क ु डापासी 47 273 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.228
112 क ु डापासी 47 274 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.233
113 क ु डापासी 47 275 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.247
114 क ु डापासी 47 276 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.075
115 क ु डापासी 47 277 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.132
116 क ु डापासी 47 278 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.106
117 क ु डापासी 47 279 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.283
118 क ु डापासी 47 280 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.285
119 क ु डापासी 47 281 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.028
120 क ु डापासी 47 282 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.019
121 क ु डापासी 54 283 पडिया सा सुपुत्र नहैया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.091
122 क ु डापासी 54 284 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.080
123 क ु डापासी 114/16 289 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.021
124 क ु डापासी 114/16 290 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.022
125 क ु डापासी 114/16 291 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.046
126 क ु डापासी 114/16 292 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा तैला 0.011
127 क ु डापासी 114/16 293 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.010
128 क ु डापासी 114/16 295 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा तैला 0.007
129 क ु डापासी 54 297 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.065
130 क ु डापासी 114/33 298 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.030
131 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 54 299 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.027
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
132 क ु डापासी 114/33 300 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.014
133 क ु डापासी 54 301 पिड़या सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.029
134 क ु डापासी 54 302 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.089
135 क ु डापासी 114/16 303 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.037
136 क ु डापासी 114/16 304 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.042
137 क ु डापासी 114/16 305 हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.098
138 क ु डापासी 54 306 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता देई 0.033
139 क ु डापासी 54 307 पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.044
140 क ु डापासी 114/33 309 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.107
141 क ु डापासी 114/86 317 राठी सेठी सुपुत्र आनंद सेठी सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.036
142 क ु डापासी 114/86 318 राठी सेठी सुपुत्र आनंद सेठी सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.016
143 क ु डापासी 114/73 319 सरोिजनी नायक पत् नी अजय नायक पतीता 0.053
144 क ु डापासी 114/33 320 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.255
145 क ु डापासी 47 347 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.043
146 क ु डापासी 47 348 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.106
147 क ु डापासी 47 349 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.230
148 क ु डापासी 47 350 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.065
149 क ु डापासी 47 351 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.186
150 क ु डापासी 47 352 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.018
151 क ु डापासी 47 353 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.157
152 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 47 354 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.143
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
153 क ु डापासी 47 355 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.040
154 क ु डापासी 47 356 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.121
155 क ु डापासी 47 357 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.029
156 क ु डापासी 47 358 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.127
157 क ु डापासी 47 359 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य पतीता 0.028
158 क ु डापासी 47 360 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.116
159 क ु डापासी 47 361 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.121
160 क ु डापासी 114/24 364 बैशनब राउत सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउत तैला 0.155
161 क ु डापासी 114/24 365 बैशनब राउत सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउत तैला 0.126
162 क ु डापासी 99 367 सारथी प्रधान सुपुत्र सिबा प्रधान तैला 0.182
163 क ु डापासी 46 370 नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा तैला 0.259
164 क ु डापासी 114/79 371 मनोज कु मार सा सुपुत्र गऊरा चन् ा सा तैला 0.082
165 क ु डापासी 88 375 माही दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे तैला 0.101
166 क ु डापासी 10 377 कल्पतारू दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे और अन्य तैला 0.114
167 क ु डापासी 10 378 कल्पतारू दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे और अन्य तैला 0.319
168 क ु डापासी 114/29 379 जोगेन् मलिक सुपुत्र नरोत्तम मलिक तैला 0.251
169 क ु डापासी 58 380 पलाऊ सा सुपुत्र नाताबार सा और अन्य तैला 0.397
170 क ु डापासी 23 381 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.233
171 क ु डापासी 57 382 पलाऊ सा सुपुत्र नाता सा और अन्य तैला 0.211
172 क ु डापासी 28 386 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.049
173 क ु डापासी 28 387 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.081
174 क ु डापासी 28 388 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.201
175 क ु डापासी 28 389 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.207
176 क ु डापासी 28 390 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.051
177 क ु डापासी 28 391 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.067
178 क ु डापासी 28 392 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.102
179 क ु डापासी 28 393 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.099
180 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 29 395 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.110
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
181 क ु डापासी 29 396 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.193
182 क ु डापासी 29 397 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.050
183 क ु डापासी 28 398 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.046
184 क ु डापासी 29 400 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.109
185 क ु डापासी 29 401 जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी तैला 0.089
186 क ु डापासी 114/42 402 प्रदीप प्रधान सुपुत्र त्रिलोचन प्रधान तैला 0.097
187 क ु डापासी 114/43 404 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.164
188 क ु डापासी 24 405 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.176
189 क ु डापासी 24 406 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.081
190 क ु डापासी 24 407 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.038
191 क ु डापासी 71 408 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.031
192 क ु डापासी 71 409 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.016
193 क ु डापासी 71 410 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.019
194 क ु डापासी 24 411 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.040
195 क ु डापासी 24 412 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.070
196 क ु डापासी 24 413 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.029
197 क ु डापासी 24 414 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.064
198 क ु डापासी 24 415 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.087
199 क ु डापासी 24 416 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.059
200 क ु डापासी 71 417 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.057
201 क ु डापासी 71 418 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.043
202 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 11 420 कालांदी सा सुपुत्र सधाबा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.229
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
203 क ु डापासी 70 421 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.156
204 क ु डापासी 70 422 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा पतीता 0.020
205 क ु डापासी 70 423 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.160
206 क ु डापासी 70 424 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा पतीता 0.027
207 क ु डापासी 114/27 425 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.056
208 क ु डापासी 114/27 426 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.162
209 क ु डापासी 12 427 क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक तैला 0.149
210 क ु डापासी 114/33 428 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.035
211 क ु डापासी 114/33 429 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.032
212 क ु डापासी 53 430 पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक तैला 0.064
213 क ु डापासी 12 431 क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.062
214 क ु डापासी 12 432 क ु लमिण नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक तैला 0.053
215 क ु डापासी 114/48 434 धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा तैला 0.018
216 क ु डापासी 114/50 435 प्रदीप सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा तैला 0.037
217 क ु डापासी 71 437 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.355
218 क ु डापासी 71 438 बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य तैला 0.065
219 क ु डापासी 114/48 439 धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा तैला 0.056
220 क ु डापासी 114/48 440 धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा तैला 0.036
221 क ु डापासी 114/50 441 प्रदीप सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा तैला 0.070
222 क ु डापासी 114/49 442 खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा तैला 0.032
223 क ु डापासी 114/49 443 खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा तैला 0.023
224 क ु डापासी 114/49 444 खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा तैला 0.045
225 क ु डापासी 114/49 445 खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.029
226 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114/45 446 मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधन सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.041
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
227 क ु डापासी 109 447 सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य तैला 0.023
228 क ु डापासी 109 448 सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य तैला 0.025
229 क ु डापासी 109 449 सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य तैला 0.015
230 क ु डापासी 109 450 सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य तैला 0.021
231 क ु डापासी 43 452 नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.041
232 क ु डापासी 43 453 नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा तैला 0.018
233 क ु डापासी 114/43 454 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा तैला 0.050
234 क ु डापासी 114/43 499 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा तैला 0.018
235 क ु डापासी 108 500 सुकांती नायक पत् नी चैतन्य नायक तैला 0.141
236 क ु डापासी 114/43 501 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.022
237 क ु डापासी 114/43 502 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.037
238 क ु डापासी 114/43 503 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.053
239 क ु डापासी 24 504 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य तैला 0.061
240 क ु डापासी 114/43 505 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.058
241 क ु डापासी 114/43 506 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.040
242 क ु डापासी 114/43 507 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.072
243 क ु डापासी 52 531 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.050
244 क ु डापासी 52 532 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.077
245 क ु डापासी 52 533 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.014
246 क ु डापासी 52 534 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.062
247 क ु डापासी 52 535 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.103
248 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 52 536 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.119
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
249 क ु डापासी 52 537 पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा पतीता 0.025
250 क ु डापासी 114/48 538 धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.025
251 क ु डापासी 114/45 539 मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधना सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.070
252 क ु डापासी 50 540 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.039
253 क ु डापासी 77 541 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.018
254 क ु डापासी 77 542 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.018
255 क ु डापासी 77 543 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.009
256 क ु डापासी 50 544 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.011
257 क ु डापासी 95 545 लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.012
258 क ु डापासी 50 546 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.015
259 क ु डापासी 50 547 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.012
260 क ु डापासी 95 548 लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.022
261 क ु डापासी 95 549 लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.022
262 क ु डापासी 50 550 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.084
263 क ु डापासी 77 551 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.081
264 क ु डापासी 114 552 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.027
265 क ु डापासी 50 553 पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.035
266 क ु डापासी 114/26 554 धबई सा सुपुत्र हादीबंधु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.020
267 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 61 555 परदेसी माझी सुपुत्र निमई माझी और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.094
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
268 क ु डापासी 77 556 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.097
269 क ु डापासी 114 557 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.132
270 क ु डापासी 77 558 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.044
271 क ु डापासी 114 559 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.013
272 क ु डापासी 114 560 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.027
273 क ु डापासी 61 561 परदेसी माझी सुपुत्र निमई माझी और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.041
274 क ु डापासी 114 562 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.036
275 क ु डापासी 77 563 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.034
276 क ु डापासी 114 564 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.046
277 क ु डापासी 77 565 बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.094
278 क ु डापासी 50 566 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.077
279 क ु डापासी 50 567 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.060
280 क ु डापासी 50 568 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.016
281 क ु डापासी 50 569 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.016
282 क ु डापासी 50 570 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.011
283 क ु डापासी 50 571 पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.021
284 क ु डापासी 95 572 लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.032
285 क ु डापासी 95 573 लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.016
286 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114/26 574 धुबई सा सुपुत्र हादीबंधु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.020
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
287 क ु डापासी 95 575 लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.036
288 क ु डापासी 95 576 लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.122
289 क ु डापासी 95 577 लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य पतीता 0.007
290 क ु डापासी 80 582 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.055
291 क ु डापासी 80 583 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य पतीता 0.036
292 क ु डापासी 80 584 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.148
293 क ु डापासी 80 585 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.027
294 क ु डापासी 80 586 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य तैला 0.031
295 क ु डापासी 80 587 बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.035
296 क ु डापासी 17 594 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.052
297 क ु डापासी 4 595 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.025
298 क ु डापासी 4 596 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.053
299 क ु डापासी 4 597 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.059
300 क ु डापासी 4 598 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.048
301 क ु डापासी 17 599 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.091
302 क ु डापासी 17 606 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.058
303 क ु डापासी 17 607 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.039
304 क ु डापासी 4 616 इन् ा सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.040
305 क ु डापासी 17 617 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.031
306 क ु डापासी 22 618 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा तैला 0.031
307 क ु डापासी 22 619 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.072
308 क ु डापासी 22 620 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.034
309 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114 621 हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.090
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
310 क ु डापासी 17 622 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.093
311 क ु डापासी 4 623 इन् ा सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.072
312 क ु डापासी 22 624 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा तैला 0.018
313 क ु डापासी 22 625 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा तैला 0.019
314 क ु डापासी 17 626 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.022
315 क ु डापासी 17 627 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा तैला 0.030
316 क ु डापासी 4 628 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.022
317 क ु डापासी 18 629 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.049
318 क ु डापासी 18 630 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.018
319 क ु डापासी 18 632 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.045
320 क ु डापासी 33 633 दुखई सा सुपुत्र महान सा तैला 0.072
321 क ु डापासी 65 637 पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा तैला 0.119
322 क ु डापासी 18 638 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.035
323 क ु डापासी 18 639 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.066
324 क ु डापासी 18 640 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.064
325 क ु डापासी 18 641 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.070
326 क ु डापासी 18 642 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.011
327 क ु डापासी 18 643 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.012
328 क ु डापासी 18 644 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.011
329 क ु डापासी 18 645 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.008
330 क ु डापासी 18 646 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.028
331 क ु डापासी 18 647 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.013
332 क ु डापासी 18 648 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.025
333 क ु डापासी 18 649 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.031
334 क ु डापासी 18 650 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य तैला 0.059
335 क ु डापासी 18 651 िखरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.042
336 क ु डापासी 18 652 खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.043
337 क ु डापासी 65 659 पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.127
338 क ु डापासी 65 660 पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा तैला 0.097
339 क ु डापासी 33 661 दुखई सा सुपुत्र मोहन सा तैला 0.109
340 क ु डापासी 113 671 हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी पतीता 0.042
341 क ु डापासी 113 672 हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.040
342 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 64 674 प्रहलाद सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा तैला 0.445
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
343 क ु डापासी 114/82 675 सुरेन् चन् माली सुपुत्र नीलय माली तैला 0.167
344 क ु डापासी 32 676 दहाना नायक सुपुत्र चन्दल नायक तैला 0.387
345 क ु डापासी 92 682 रासानंदा सा सुपुत्र बुधई माझी और अन्य तैला 0.090
346 क ु डापासी 113 686 हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी तैला 0.115
347 क ु डापासी 113 688 हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.174
348 क ु डापासी 113 689 हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी तैला 0.020
349 क ु डापासी 78 692 बुधई सा सुपुत्र आनंद सा तैला 0.001
350 क ु डापासी 4 738 इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.023
351 क ु डापासी 22 739 चन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा तैला 0.031
352 क ु डापासी 15 955 क े श्ब सा सुपुत्र जगई सा- और अन्य सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.011
353 क ु डापासी 114/31 956 भागीरथी बहेरा सुपुत्र नाबाघाना बहेरा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.001
354 क ु डापासी 97 1227 लोचन सा सुपुत्र जाडु सा तैला 0.184
355 क ु डापासी 53 1233 पतीतापबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.040
356 क ु डापासी 103 1234 zीनिबास नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.247
357 क ु डापासी 114/33 1235 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.337
358 क ु डापासी 1 1236 अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.241
359 क ु डापासी 114/71 1237 विनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.320
360 क ु डापासी 114/25 1238 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.161
361 क ु डापासी 67 1239 पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.147
362 क ु डापासी 67 1240 पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.102
363 क ु डापासी 67 1243 पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.015
364 क ु डापासी 114/84 1244 सत्यभामा सेठी पी घनश्याम सेठी तैला 0.082
365 क ु डापासी 1 1246 अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.132
366 क ु डापासी 1 1247 अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.031
367 क ु डापासी 1 1248 अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक तैला 0.230
368 क ु डापासी 5 1249 उछाबा नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक और अन्य तैला 0.158
369 क ु डापासी 114/41 1250 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनब नायक तैला 0.088
370 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 5 1251 उछाबा नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक और तैला 0.075
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
अन्य
371 क ु डापासी 114/18 1253 मनोरंजन नायक सुपुत्र चैतन्य नायक तैला 0.091
372 क ु डापासी 114/33 1254 zीमांता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा तैला 0.036
373 क ु डापासी 114/33 1255 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.057
374 क ु डापासी 114/33 1256 zीमांता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा तैला 0.193
375 क ु डापासी 13 1258 क े श्बा सा सुपुत्र कु ं गई सा तैला 0.206
376 क ु डापासी 89 1259 रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा तैला 0.074
377 क ु डापासी 89 1260 रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा तैला 0.094
378 क ु डापासी 40 1261 नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा तैला 0.164
379 क ु डापासी 114/29 1262 जोगेन् मलिक सुपुत्र नरोत्तम मलिक तैला 0.350
380 क ु डापासी 114/69 1263 दुर्गा चरन नायक सुपुत्र पतीतापावन नायक घाराबड़ी 0.025
381 क ु डापासी 93 1265 राम सेथे सुपुत्र दुखु सेथे घाराबड़ी 0.020
382 क ु डापासी 63 1266 प्रहलाद माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी घाराबड़ी 0.022
383 क ु डापासी 86 1268 भोलेर सा सुपुत्र बंगुरू सा घाराबड़ी 0.020
384 क ु डापासी 42 1269 िनरंजन माझी सुपुत्र बीरा सा घाराबड़ी 0.017
385 क ु डापासी 41 1271 निमई माझी सुपुत्र ठाका माझी घाराबड़ी 0.020
386 क ु डापासी 114/77 1272 बल्लभ चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र हल्धर प्रधान घाराबड़ी 0.019
387 क ु डापासी 6 1274 कास्तु बाघा सुपुत्र कमार बाघा घाराबड़ी 0.015
388 क ु डापासी 96 1275 लमण सा सुपुत्र पांछू सा घाराबड़ी 0.018
389 क ु डापासी 90 1277 रमेश नायक सुपुत्र कालिया नायक घाराबड़ी 0.017
390 क ु डापासी 35 1282 दोलागोविदा सा सुपुत्र नेबई सा घाराबड़ी 0.020
391 क ु डापासी 89 1284 रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा घाराबड़ी 0.019
392 क ु डापासी 114/22 1286 पंचाली बारिक पत् नी प्रभात किरण बारिक घाराबड़ी 0.015
393 क ु डापासी 114/37 1288 कौश्ल्या बहेरा पी सुजीत बहेरा घाराबड़ी 0.016
394 क ु डापासी 55 1291 पाबित्रा सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा घाराबड़ी 0.014
395 क ु डापासी 34 1293 दुरजु सा सुपुत्र पथारनी सा घाराबड़ी 0.012
396 क ु डापासी 98 1295 सरबेर मतैरी सुपुत्र लमी धन मतैरी घाराबड़ी 0.021
397 क ु डापासी 112 1297 सुशांत प्रधान सुपुत्र निमई प्रधान और अन्य घाराबड़ी 0.018
398 क ु डापासी 114/6 1300 चितन्या नायक सुपुत्र विबा नायक सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.123
399 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114/7 1301 खिरोदा कु मार महाराना सुपुत्र जतैया तैला 0.081
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
महाराना
400 क ु डापासी 114/8 1302 पंचाली बारिक पत् नी प्रभात किरन बारिक तैला 0.061
401 क ु डापासी 114/41 1303 चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैब नायक तैला 0.090
402 क ु डापासी 114/11 1304 धर्मापाड़ा सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा तैला 0.138
403 क ु डापासी 114/11 1305 धर्मापाड़ा सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा तैला 0.114
404 क ु डापासी 114/12 1306 पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक तैला 0.081
405 क ु डापासी 114/13 1307 मनमोहन सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा तैला 0.057
406 क ु डापासी 114/16 1308 हादीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकदुसिया सा तैला 0.045
407 क ु डापासी 114/33 1309 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.231
408 क ु डापासी 114/30 1314 बिबा राउता सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउता तैला 0.093
409 क ु डापासी 114/33 1316 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.164
410 क ु डापासी 114/33 1317 zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.129
411 क ु डापासी 114/30 1318 विबा राउता सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउता तैला 0.201
412 क ु डापासी 114/34 1319 प्रमीला नायक सुपुत्र कीर्तन नायक तैला 0.237
413 क ु डापासी 114/38 1320 बिनोद कु मार सा सुपुत्र मधुसुदन सा तैला 0.090
414 क ु डापासी 114/19 1321 गनया रंजन नायक सुपुत्र चितन्या नायक तैला 0.158
415 क ु डापासी 114/39 1322 आलोक कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा तैला 0.066
416 क ु डापासी 114/45 1324 मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधना सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.036
417 क ु डापासी 114/46 1325 नारायण सा सुपुत्र प्रणाबंधु सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.049
418 क ु डापासी 114/46 1326 नारायण सा सुपुत्र प्रणाबंधु सा तैला 0.017
419 क ु डापासी 114/47 1327 सिबरामा सा सुपुत्र पबीत्रा सा तैला 0.010
420 क ु डापासी 114/47 1328 सिबरामा सा सुपुत्र पबीत्रा सा तैला 0.005
421 क ु डापासी 114/51 1329 ससमितरानी प्रधान पी उमाकांत माझी सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.184
422 क ु डापासी 114/53 1330 रश्मीता सा पी प्रदीप कु मार प्रधान तैला 0.074
423 क ु डापासी 114/54 1331 अजित कु मार दे-री सुपुत्र दुयiधन दे-री तैला 0.045
424 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114/57 1333 पिताबस सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा तैला 0.049
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
425 क ु डापासी 114/58 1334 सारथी सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा तैला 0.046
426 क ु डापासी 114/59 1335 zीनिबास सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा तैला 0.048
427 क ु डापासी 114/60 1336 सुरथ सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा तैला 0.038
428 क ु डापासी 114/61 1337 राके श रंजन रऊता सुपुत्र प्रफू ल्ल कु मार रऊता तैला 0.101
429 क ु डापासी 114/63 1338 राजकिशोर दे-री सुपुत्र महेर दे-री तैला 0.159
430 क ु डापासी 114/81 1339 प्रशांत कु मार सा सुपुत्र नेत्रनंदा सा तैला 0.120
431 क ु डापासी 114/64 1340 संतवोना मिzा पत् नी नरेन् कु मार मिzा तैला 0.048
432 क ु डापासी 114/66 1341 देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा तैला 0.056
433 क ु डापासी 114/66 1342 देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा तैला 0.018
434 क ु डापासी 114/66 1343 देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.060
435 क ु डापासी 114/67 1344 चिनमया कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत क ु मार बहेरा तैला 0.159
436 क ु डापासी 114/68 1345 बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा तैला 0.119
437 क ु डापासी 114/68 1346 बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा तैला 0.014
438 क ु डापासी 114/68 1347 बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा तैला 0.067
439 क ु डापासी 114/70 1348 सुशांत कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा तैला 0.035
440 क ु डापासी 114/39 1349 आलोक कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा तैला 0.042
441 क ु डापासी 114/73 1350 सरोिजनी नायक पत् नी अजया नायक सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.015
442 क ु डापासी 114/74 1351 तिकान सा सुपुत्र दुजयाधन सा तैला 0.111
443 क ु डापासी 114/75 1352 ट ूना बहेरा सुपुत्र प्रकाश बहेरा तैला 0.096
444 क ु डापासी 114/76 1353 बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत कु मार बहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.385
445 क ु डापासी 114/78 1354 अरूण प्रधान सुपुत्र मोहन प्रधान तैला 0.105
446 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) क ु डापासी 114/85 1356 करूणाकर महापात्रा सुपुत्र चन् मणि महापात्रा तैला 0.097
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
447 क ु डापासी 84 1357 भागीरथी माझी सुपुत्र बीरा माझी और अन्य घाराबड़ी 0.011
448 क ु डापासी 114/87 1358 सत्येन् प्रधान सुपुत्र घनश्याम प्रधान और अन्य तैला 0.125
449 क ु डापासी 114/88 1359 उधाब सा और नरौत्तम सा सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी 0.009
450 क ु डापासी 114/89 1360 र ंजन बहेरा सुपुत्र रमेश बहेरा तैला 0.036
451 क ु डापासी 114/90 1361 रजत कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र रमेश बहेरा तैला 0.035
जोड़ : $ाम क $ाम –––– कु डापासी $ाम $ाम क क ु डापासी 42.488
(5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 धौराखमान 11 5 घुरूदु सा सुपुत्र बुटु सा तैला 0.441
2 धौराखमान 43 10 सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी तैला 0.237
3 धौराखमान 43 11 सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी तैला 0.340
4 धौराखमान 43 12 सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी तैला 0.194
5 धौराखमान 45/17 13 मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन तैला 0.771
6 धौराखमान 45/12 15 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.748
7 धौराखमान 8 16 कस्तूरी सा सुपुत्र अरखिता दे-री और अन्य तैला 0.071
8 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) धौराखमान 45/19 17 बैसनाबा राउत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राउत तैला 0.149
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
9 धौराखमान 45/19 18 बैसनाबा राउत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राउत तैला 0.121
10 धौराखमान 45/42 20 सुदर्शन दे-री सुपुत्र दांगी दे-री तैला 0.375
11 धौराखमान 24 21 बालकृ ष्णा सा सुपुत्र भागबत सा और अन्य तैला 0.358
12 धौराखमान 28 40 बैरागी सा सुपुत्री सबर सा तैला 0.479
13 धौराखमान 24 53 बालकृ ष्ण सा सुपुत्र भागबत सा और अन्य तैला 1.637
14 धौराखमान 45/12 54 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.022
15 धौराखमान 45/17 84 मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन तैला 0.267
16 धौराखमान 35 85 मिलू बहेरा सुपुत्र हल्धर बहेरा तैला 0.072
17 धौराखमान 45/45 86 प्रफु ल्ल कु मार सेठी सुपुत्र बौरी बंधु सेठी तैला 0.101
18 धौराखमान 45/41 87 विनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन्य तैला 0.307
19 धौराखमान 45/12 92 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.622
20 धौराखमान 45/12 93 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.065
21 धौराखमान 2 94 अंतरयामी सा सुपुत्र धानी सा तैला 0.079
22 धौराखमान 20 98 पुनिया सा सुपुत्री दामबुरू सा तैला 0.136
23 धौराखमान 22 99 बौरीबंधु दे-री सुपुत्र पानू दे-री तैला 0.101
24 धौराखमान 20 103 पुनिया सा सुपुत्री दमबुरू सा तैला 0.170
25 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) धौराखमान 45/17 104 मानव रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन तैला 0.245
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
26 धौराखमान 45/50 105 िवश् नु बेहरा सुपुत्र दीनबंधु बहेरा तैला 0.039
27 धौराखमान 14 224 जयकृ ष्णा प्रधान सुपुत्र दैतरी प्रधान सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली 0.153
28 धौराखमान 45/2 563 भागीरती सा सुपुत्र नेपाला सा और अन्य तैला 0.037
29 धौराखमान 45/3 566 परनाती बारिक पत् नी नारायण बारिक तैला 0.096
30 धौराखमान 45/4 567 पावर्ती बारिक पत् नी अय कु मार बारिक तैला 0.036
31 धौराखमान 45/8 571 पर्वत किरन बारिक सुपुत्र अनुकू ल बारिक तैला 0.036
32 धौराखमान 45/11 574 पंचाली बारिक पत् नी पर्वत किरन बारिक तैला 0.026
33 धौराखमान 45/12 575 Rाम की कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.347
34 धौराखमान 45/12 578 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.521
35 धौराखमान 45/12 579 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.129
36 धौराखमान 45/13 580 बिनोदिनी राऊता पी विाबा राऊता तैला 0.151
37 धौराखमान 45/14 581 बसंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिध्याधर सा तैला 0.049
38 धौराखमान 45/15 582 ितकली बेहरा पत् नी दामबारू बहेरा तैला 0.142
39 धौराखमान 45/17 584 मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन तैला 0.343
40 धौराखमान 45/19 587 बैसनाबा राऊत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राऊत तैला 0.120
41 धौराखमान 45/21 588 Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम तैला 0.595
42 धौराखमान 45/23 589 zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.102
43 धौराखमान 45/23 590 zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.194
44 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) धौराखमान 45/23 591 zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण तैला 0.101
s. सं. आर.I सeकल/ Rाम खाता संख्या प्लाट संख्या काश्तकारी का नाम किस्म परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
सा
45 धौराखमान 45/23 592 zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा तैला 0.194
46 धौराखमान 45/29 598 दीपन्दु कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र जडुमणि प्रधान तैला 0.114
47 धौराखमान 45/31 600 धीरेन् कु मार सा सुपुत्र भास्क सा और अन्य तैला 0.440
48 धौराखमान 45/49 612 दीपतिरनी बारिक पत् नी बरूण कु मार बारिक तैला 0.024
जोड़ जोड़ : : : : जोड़ जोड़ $ाम $ाम –––– धौराखमान $ाम $ाम धौराखमान 12.099
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2575 2576 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2577 2578 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2579 2580 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2581 2582 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2583 2584 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2585 2586 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2587 2588 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2589 2590 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2591 2592 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2593 2594 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2595 2596 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2597 2598 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2599 2600 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2601 2602 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2603 2604 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2605 2606 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2607 2608 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2609 2610 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2611 2612 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2613 2614 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2615 2616 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2617 2618 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2619 2620 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2621 2622 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2623 2624 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2625 2626 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2627 2628 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

सीमासीमासीमासीमा----िववरणिववरणिववरणिववरण: : : :

नैनी कोयला ब्लॉक की सीमा बिदु संख्या 1 से शुरू होती है, जो स्टेट हाईवे संख्या 63 के किनारे और गौदूनी नाला के दक्षिणी किनारे पर स्थित है। जहां से सीमा बिदु संख्या -29 तक जाने के लिए स्टेट हाइवे संख्या 63 (अंगुल टाउन की ओर) के साथ दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में आगे बढ़ती है। बिदु संख्या 29 से बिदु संख्या 136 तक सीमा बाएं मुड़के उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर बढ़ती है, और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन पर चलती Cई बिदु संख्या 136 तक पCँचती है । बिदु संख्या 136 से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर मुड़के गाँव तेंतुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर होकर आगे सवE नंबर 195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से होकर गुजरती है।

बिदु संख्या ए से बिदु संख्या सी तक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर मुड़के गाँव कसीडीहा होकर आगे सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 से होकर गुजरती है । बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'ड.' तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर- पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव थलीपिस से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव कु दापसी से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 30 तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव धौराखमान से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 30 से बिदु संख्या 31 तक सीमा बायL की ओर मुड़के उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में जाती है, जो कि धौराखमान से होकर गुजरती है जो सवE नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 से होकर गुज़रती है और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा पर बिदु संख्या 31 को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 31 से लेकर बिदु संख्या 35 तक सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में आगे बढ़ कर छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन पर स्थित बिदु संख्या 35 से मिलती है । बिदु संख्या 35 से बिदु संख्या 1 तक की सीमा बायL ओर मुड़के दक्षिण-पMिम दिशा में गौदुनी नाला के दक्षिण किनारे से धारा के साथ बिदु संख्या 1 से मिलती है जहां से सीमा शुरू Cई थी।

(1) Oाम: तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर : सीमा बिदु संख्या -136, 'क' और 'ख' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा बिदु संख्या -136 से शुरू होती है, जो कि त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के पास स्थित है और सवE नंबर 195 पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा और ब्लॉक सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या -136 से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर पूर्व दिशा में गाँव तेंतुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर से होते Cए सवE नंबर -195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से गुजर कर सवE नंबर -200 पर[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2629 उत्तर पूर्वी छोर पर गाँव की सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'क' से बिदु संख्या 'ख' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर -200, 199, 195 से होकर जाती Cई बिदु संख्या 'ख' पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को उत्तर- पूर्व दिशा में छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'ख' से बिदु संख्या -136 तक यह तेंतुलोई गोपीनाथपुर गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच सामान्य सीमा है।

(2) Oाम: कासीडीहा : सीमा बिदु संख्या 'क', 'ग', 'घ', और 'ख' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'क', जो कि सवE नंबर -36 और सवE नंबर 34 के लिए आम बिदु पर स्थित है, से शुरू होती है। बिदु संख्या 'क' से बिदु संख्या 'ग' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती है, जो कसीडीहा गाँव से होते Cए सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 को छू ती Cई उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर गाँव की सीमा सवE नंबर 17 पर समाप्त होती है। बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'घ' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में चली गई और त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु से गुजरती है, और सवE नंबर 2, 1 के साथ आगे बढ़ कर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 'घ' पर छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'घ' से बिदु संख्या 'ख' तक यह कसीडीहा गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ख' से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक की गांव की सीमा दक्षिण-पMिम दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 30, 31, 32, 36 को समावेश करती है और बिदु संख्या 'क' पर सीमा बंद होती है।

(3) Oाम : थलीपसी: सीमा बिदु संख्या 'ग', 'ड.', 'च', 'छ', और 'घ' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'ग' से शुरू होती है, जो सवE नंबर 20 पर स्थित है। बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'ड.' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गांव थलीपिस के बीच से सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229 , 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 और 546 से गुजरकर उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा में गाँव की सीमा सवE नं 546 को छू ती है ।

बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से लेकर बिदु संख्या 'च' तक, गाँव की सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में सवE नं 546, 545, 542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523 को संवेशित करते Cए जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'च' से बिदु संख्या 'छ' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर -510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403, 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, और 1 को संवेशित करते Cए पMिम दिशा में बिदु संख्या 'छ' पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'छ' से बिदु संख्या 'घ' तक यह थलीपिस गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'घ' से बिदु संख्या 'ग' तक गांव की सीमा दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'ग' पर बंद होती है।

(4) Oाम: बिम्बाधरपुर : सीमा बिदु संख्या 'छ', 'च', और 'ज' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'छ' से शुरू होती है जो त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के करीब है और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'छ' से बिदु संख्या 'च' तक, गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379 को संवेिशत करते Cए पूर्व दिशा में जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'च' से बिदु संख्या 'ज' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर -पMिम दिशा में बिदु संख्या 'ज' पर छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है।

बिदु संख्या 'ज' से बिदु संख्या 'छ' तक यह बिम्बाधरपुर गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है, जो कि बिदु संख्या 'छ' पर बंद होती है।

(5) Oाम: कु डापासी: सीमा बिदु संख्या 'ड.', 'झ', 'ञ', 'ज' और 'च' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से शुरू होती है, जो कि सवE नंबर 678 पर त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के करीब स्थित है।

बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक ब्लॉक की सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर कु डापासी के बीच सवE नं 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 के मध्य से गुजर कर जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 'ञ' तक गाँव की सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा की ओर सवE नं 461, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 को संवेशित करते Cए छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 'ञ' पर छू ती है।

बिदु संख्या 'ञ' से बिदु संख्या एच तक यह कु डापासी गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ज' से बिदु संख्या 'च' और बिदु संख्या 'ड.', गाँव की सीमा दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353,2630 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678, को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'ड.' पर बंद होती है।

(6) Oाम: धौराखमान: बिदु संख्या 'झ', 30, 31 और 'ञ' से िघरी है।

Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'झ' से शुरू होती है, जो कि सवE नंबर 222 पर स्थित है। बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 30 तक ब्लॉक की सीमा गाँव धौराखमान और सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से गुजर कर उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती है। बिदु संख्या 30 से बिदु संख्या 31 तक ब्लॉक सीमा सवE नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 31 पर छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 31 से बिदु संख्या 'ञ' तक, यह धौराखमान गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ञ' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक, Oाम की सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 222, को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'झ' पर बंद होती है I

[फा. सं. 43015/18/2015-एलए एXड आईआर]

राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव

MINISTRY OF COAL

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 655.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1704 (E), dated the 10th May, 2016 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, part II, section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 11th May, 2016, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 912.7892 hectares (approximately) or 2255.502 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification and the said notice was extended for a further period of one year commencing from 10th May, 2018 vide notification number 1651(E), dated the 17th April, 2018;

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the schedule appended hereto.

Note 1: The plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the General Manager, Naini Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited ( A Government Company), H. No. 129 of NAC, Mishrapada, District Angul -759122, Odisha or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700 001 or at the office of Collector and the District Magistrate, District Angul, Odisha.

Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of the section 8 of the said Act, relating to objection to acquisition, which provides as follows:-

"8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.

Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2631

(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.

(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act."

Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O.3347(E), dated the 9th December, 2015, published in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 10th December, 2015.

SCHEDULE

THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED

Naini Opencast Project, Naini Area

District-Angul, Odisha

[ Plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018]

All Rights:

(I) Table

Sl. No. Name of villages Thana Thana number District Type of land in hectares Total in hectares Total in acres Remarks
Tenancy Forest Non- Forest Govt.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
1 Kasidiha Chhendipada 95 Angul 0.961 9.805 0.750 11.516 28.457 Part
2 Tentuloi gopinathapur Chhendipada 94 Angul - 1.461 0.654 2.115 5.226 Part
3 Thalipasi Chhendipada 101 Angul 20.555 4.207 3.052 27.814 68.730 Part
4 Bimbadharapur Chhendipada 102 Angul 35.724 51.101 8.873 95.698 236.475 Full
5 Kudapasi Chhendipada 103 Angul 42.488 56.744 1.716 100.948 249.448 Part
6 Dhaurakhaman Chhendipada 104 Angul 12.099 16.862 2.652 31.613 78.117 Part
7 Chhendipada Reserve forest Chhendipada - Angul - 643.095 0.000 643.095 1589.122 Part
Total: 111.827 783.275 17.697 912.799 2255.575
Total : 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately)

1. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kasidiha :

1 to 16, 17(P), 20(P), 23(P), 24(P), 25 to 29, 30(P), 31, 32(P), 33(P), 34(P), 36(P), 3092(P), 3138, 3176.

2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Tentuloi Gopinathpur :

193(P), 194(P), 195(P), 196 to 199, 200(P), 201(P).

3. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Thalipasi :

1 to 17, 18(P), 19(P), 20(P), 52(P), 53 to 62, 63(P), 64(P), 66(P), 67, 68(P), 69 to 118, 119(P), 120(P), 229(P), 233(P), 234(P), 235, 236, 237(P), 238(P), 239, 240, 241(P), 242(P), 243, 244, 245(P), 247(P), 250(P), 251 to 431, 432(P), 433(P), 434(P), 436(P), 437(P), 449(P), 471(P), 472(P), 473, 474, 475, 476(P), 477 to 545, 546(P), 547(P), 548(P), 549, 550(P), 551(P), 552(P), 553(P), 561(P), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.

2632 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Bimbadharapur :

1 to 437.

5. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kudapasi :

1 to 460, 461(P), 462(P), 463 to 466, 467(P), 492(P), 499(P), 500(P), 501 to 522, 523(P), 527(P), 528, 529(P), 530(P), 531(P), 532 to 630, 631(P), 632(P), 633(P), 634(P), 635(P), 636 to 677, 678(P), 679(P), 680(P), 681(P), 682(P), 685(P), 686(P), 687(P), 688, 689(P), 690, 691(P), 692(P), 737(P), 738, 739, 740, 741(P), 769(P), 770 to 783, 784(P), 795(P), 796(P), 797(P), 802(P), 803(P), 804, 805, 806, 807(P), 809(P), 955(P), 956(P), 1223, 1224(P), 1225 to 1231, 1233 to 1297, 1300 to 1311, 1314, 1316 to 1322, 1324 to 1331, 1333 to 1363.

6. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Dhaurakhaman:

1 to 19, 20(P), 21(P), 22 to 52, 53(P), 54(P), 84(P), 85(P), 86 to 101, 102(P), 103, 104, 105(P), 176(P), 178(P), 179(P), 180(P), 181(P), 182 to 212, 213(P), 214 to 221, 222(P), 223(P), 224(P), 225(P), 226(P), 255(P), 256(P), 257(P), 258, 259, 260(P), 261, 262(P), 265(P), 266(P), 267, 268(P), 269(P), 270(P), 550 to 553, 558 to 563, 566, 567, 570 to 572, 574, 575, 578 to 582, 584, 587 to 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.

7. Chhendipada Reserve forest: 643.095 hectares or 1589.122 acres.

The details of land to be acquired are given in the table below:—

(II) Table

(1) Village –Kasidiha Non-Forest Land (Private)
Sl. No. R.I Circle/ village Khata No. Plot No. Name of the Tenant Kissam Area Required for Project in hectares
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 Kasidiha 44 3 Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others Taila 0.136
2 Kasidiha 73 4 Dasarathi Sahu S/o Padmalava Sahu and Others Taila 0.176
3 Kasidiha 167 5 Maheswar sahu S/o Dasarathi Sahu and Others Taila 0.201
4 Kasidiha 44 9 Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others Patita 0.090
5 Kasidiha 44 10 Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others Patita 0.041
6 Kasidiha 44 11 Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others Patita 0.317
Total : Village : Kasidiha 0.961
1 Thalipasi 8 2 Khiramohan Sahoo S/o Jogendar Sahoo and Others Taila 0.607
2 Thalipasi 46/5 3 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu Taila 0.133
3 Thalipasi 45 4 Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and others Patita 0.061
4 Thalipasi 45 5 Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and Others Taila 0.178
5 Thalipasi 21 6 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Patita 0.101
6 Thalipasi 21 7 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Patita 0.174
7 Thalipasi 21 8 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Taila 0.243
8 Thalipasi 21 9 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Taila 0.174
9 Thalipasi 21 10 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Patita 0.049
10 Thalipasi 43 12 Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others Patita 0.118
11 Thalipasi 43 13 Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others Patita 0.510
12 Thalipasi 43 14 Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others Patita 0.049
13 Thalipasi 14 15 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.542
14 Thalipasi 14 16 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.257
15 Thalipasi 14 17 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Patita 0.047
16 Thalipasi 14 18 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.198
17 Thalipasi 14 19 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.003
18 Thalipasi 21 52 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.067
19 Thalipasi 21 53 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.105
20 Thalipasi 21 54 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.105
21 Thalipasi 21 55 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.032
22 Thalipasi 21 56 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
23 Thalipasi 21 57 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
24 Thalipasi 21 58 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
25 Thalipasi 21 59 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
26 Thalipasi 21 60 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.040
27 Thalipasi 21 61 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
28 Thalipasi 21 62 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
29 Thalipasi 21 63 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
30 Thalipasi 17 64 Dalagobonda Majhi S /o Maulamani majhi Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.106
31 Thalipasi 7 66 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Taila 0.028
32 Thalipasi 7 67 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.122
33 Thalipasi 7 68 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
34 Thalipasi 7 69 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Taila 0.046
35 Thalipasi 7 70 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
36 Thalipasi 7 71 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.091
37 Thalipasi 7 72 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.054
38 Thalipasi 7 73 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Taila 0.040
39 Thalipasi 13 74 Jogi Sahoo S/o Banchha Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.091
40 Thalipasi 7 75 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.178
41 Thalipasi 7 76 Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others Taila 0.091
42 Thalipasi 20 79 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.199
43 Thalipasi 20 80 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.059
44 Thalipasi 38 81 Budhia Majhi S/o Nabagana majhi Taila 0.221
45 Thalipasi 20 87 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.460
46 Thalipasi 20 88 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Patita 0.053
47 Thalipasi 6 91 Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.040
48 Thalipasi 6 92 Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo Taila 0.247
49 Thalipasi 27 95 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o.Madhusudan Pradhan and Others Taila 0.353
50 Thalipasi 32 96 Bikram Pradhan S/o Judunatha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.412
51 Thalipasi 25 97 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.015
52 Thalipasi 25 98 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.012
53 Thalipasi 25 99 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.024
54 Thalipasi 25 100 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.025
55 Thalipasi 46/6 101 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.072
56 Thalipasi 30 102 Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others Taila 0.190
57 Thalipasi 33 103 Bhagabat gosain S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others Taila 0.031
58 Thalipasi 46/4 105 Jasbant Pradhan S/o Joginath Pradhan and Others Gharabari 0.117
59 Thalipasi 9 106 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Gharabari 0.119
60 Thalipasi 25 107 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Gharabari 0.103
61 Thalipasi 44 108 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
62 Thalipasi 46/6 109 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
63 Thalipasi 37 110 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
64 Thalipasi 30 111 Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others Taila 0.158
65 Thalipasi 6 112 Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo Gharabari 0.146
66 Thalipasi 22 115 Padia Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.087
67 Thalipasi 6 116 Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo Gharabari 0.077
68 Thalipasi 21 117 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.102
69 Thalipasi 21 118 Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.090
70 Thalipasi 25 233 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.002
71 Thalipasi 39 234 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.111
72 Thalipasi 39 235 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.104
73 Thalipasi 15 236 Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
74 Thalipasi 39 237 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.057
75 Thalipasi 39 238 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
76 Thalipasi 39 239 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.056
77 Thalipasi 39 240 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
78 Thalipasi 39 241 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
79 Thalipasi 39 242 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.013
80 Thalipasi 39 243 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
81 Thalipasi 39 244 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
82 Thalipasi 15 245 Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.003
83 Thalipasi 39 247 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.060
84 Thalipasi 46/3 250 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
85 Thalipasi 25 251 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
86 Thalipasi 25 252 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
87 Thalipasi 46/6 253 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
88 Thalipasi 46/6 254 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.017
89 Thalipasi 44 255 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
90 Thalipasi 9 256 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
91 Thalipasi 9 257 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.016
92 Thalipasi 37 258 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
93 Thalipasi 46/3 259 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
94 Thalipasi 25 260 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.018
95 Thalipasi 9 261 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.025
96 Thalipasi 25 262 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
97 Thalipasi 9 263 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
98 Thalipasi 25 264 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
99 Thalipasi 9 265 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
100 Thalipasi 46/3 266 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
101 Thalipasi 44 267 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
102 Thalipasi 46/6 268 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
103 Thalipasi 37 269 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.017
104 Thalipasi 44 270 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Sarada Jalasachita 0.014
Pradhan Ek Fasali
105 Thalipasi 37 271 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
106 Thalipasi 46/6 272 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.061
107 Thalipasi 46/3 273 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.049
108 Thalipasi 46/3 274 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.020
109 Thalipasi 9 275 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
110 Thalipasi 46/3 276 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.050
111 Thalipasi 25 277 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.063
112 Thalipasi 9 278 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
113 Thalipasi 37 279 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
114 Thalipasi 46/6 280 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
115 Thalipasi 46/6 281 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
116 Thalipasi 37 282 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.070
117 Thalipasi 44 283 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.067
118 Thalipasi 46/6 284 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
119 Thalipasi 37 285 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.014
120 Thalipasi 37 286 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
121 Thalipasi 9 287 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
122 Thalipasi 25 288 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
123 Thalipasi 46/3 289 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
124 Thalipasi 37 290 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.053
125 Thalipasi 44 291 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
126 Thalipasi 44 292 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
127 Thalipasi 44 293 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
128 Thalipasi 46/6 294 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.035
129 Thalipasi 44 295 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Sarada Jalasachita 0.049
Pradhan Ek Fasali
130 Thalipasi 44 296 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
131 Thalipasi 37 297 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.088
132 Thalipasi 37 298 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.040
133 Thalipasi 46/6 299 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
134 Thalipasi 46/6 300 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
135 Thalipasi 44 301 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.075
136 Thalipasi 37 302 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.068
137 Thalipasi 46/6 303 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.046
138 Thalipasi 46/6 304 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
139 Thalipasi 44 305 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
140 Thalipasi 25 306 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
141 Thalipasi 25 307 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
142 Thalipasi 25 308 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
143 Thalipasi 25 309 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.058
144 Thalipasi 25 310 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
145 Thalipasi 25 311 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.046
146 Thalipasi 25 312 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.058
147 Thalipasi 25 313 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
148 Thalipasi 25 314 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
149 Thalipasi 25 315 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
150 Thalipasi 25 316 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
151 Thalipasi 46/3 321 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.055
152 Thalipasi 9 322 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
153 Thalipasi 9 323 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.054
154 Thalipasi 9 324 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.049
155 Thalipasi 9 325 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.060
156 Thalipasi 9 326 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
157 Thalipasi 9 327 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.047
158 Thalipasi 9 328 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.049
159 Thalipasi 9 329 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
160 Thalipasi 9 330 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
161 Thalipasi 46/6 331 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
162 Thalipasi 36 332 Birabar Pradhan S/o Madhusudan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
163 Thalipasi 46/3 333 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.015
164 Thalipasi 46/3 334 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
165 Thalipasi 46/3 335 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
166 Thalipasi 46/3 336 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
167 Thalipasi 46/3 337 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
168 Thalipasi 46/3 338 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.119
169 Thalipasi 46/3 339 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.064
170 Thalipasi 46/3 340 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
171 Thalipasi 37 341 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
172 Thalipasi 37 342 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.021
173 Thalipasi 46/6 344 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.025
174 Thalipasi 46/6 345 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.035
175 Thalipasi 46/6 346 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.066
176 Thalipasi 37 347 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.102
177 Thalipasi 44 348 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
178 Thalipasi 44 349 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
179 Thalipasi 37 350 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.075
180 Thalipasi 37 351 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.076
181 Thalipasi 44 352 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.145
182 Thalipasi 46/6 353 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.102
183 Thalipasi 46/6 354 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.083
184 Thalipasi 37 355 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.076
185 Thalipasi 46/6 356 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.032
186 Thalipasi 44 357 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
187 Thalipasi 44 358 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
188 Thalipasi 44 359 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
189 Thalipasi 37 360 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.018
190 Thalipasi 37 361 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
191 Thalipasi 37 362 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.035
192 Thalipasi 46/6 363 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.063
193 Thalipasi 46/6 364 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
194 Thalipasi 46/6 365 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.056
195 Thalipasi 46/3 367 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
196 Thalipasi 9 369 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.025
197 Thalipasi 9 370 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.020
198 Thalipasi 25 371 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
199 Thalipasi 46/3 372 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.083
200 Thalipasi 25 373 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.040
201 Thalipasi 9 374 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
202 Thalipasi 9 375 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.016
203 Thalipasi 25 376 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.012
204 Thalipasi 46/3 377 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
205 Thalipasi 46/3 378 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
206 Thalipasi 25 379 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
207 Thalipasi 9 380 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
208 Thalipasi 9 381 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
209 Thalipasi 25 382 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
210 Thalipasi 46/3 383 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
211 Thalipasi 46/3 384 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
212 Thalipasi 25 385 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.024
213 Thalipasi 9 386 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.024
214 Thalipasi 9 387 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
215 Thalipasi 25 388 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
216 Thalipasi 46/3 389 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.021
217 Thalipasi 46/3 390 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
218 Thalipasi 25 391 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
219 Thalipasi 9 392 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
220 Thalipasi 9 393 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
221 Thalipasi 25 394 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
222 Thalipasi 46/3 395 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
223 Thalipasi 46/3 396 Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
224 Thalipasi 25 397 Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.032
225 Thalipasi 9 398 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
226 Thalipasi 9 399 Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others Patita 0.013
227 Thalipasi 37 400 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
228 Thalipasi 37 401 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.106
229 Thalipasi 44 402 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Sarada Jalasachita 0.064
Pradhan Ek Fasali
230 Thalipasi 44 403 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.046
231 Thalipasi 44 404 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.047
232 Thalipasi 46/6 405 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.096
233 Thalipasi 46/6 406 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.078
234 Thalipasi 44 407 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.083
235 Thalipasi 46/6 408 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.108
236 Thalipasi 37 409 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.111
237 Thalipasi 37 410 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.100
238 Thalipasi 46/6 411 Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.105
239 Thalipasi 44 412 Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.088
240 Thalipasi 37 413 Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.118
241 Thalipasi 14 417 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.128
242 Thalipasi 14 421 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
243 Thalipasi 14 422 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
244 Thalipasi 14 423 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.090
245 Thalipasi 14 424 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Jalasay Ek 0.014
246 Thalipasi 14 425 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.086
247 Thalipasi 14 426 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
248 Thalipasi 14 427 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.054
249 Thalipasi 14 428 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
250 Thalipasi 14 429 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.020
251 Thalipasi 14 430 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.017
252 Thalipasi 14 431 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.076
253 Thalipasi 14 432 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
254 Thalipasi 14 433 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sarada Jalasachita 0.026
Sahoo and Others Ek Fasali
255 Thalipasi 14 434 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
256 Thalipasi 14 436 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.001
257 Thalipasi 14 437 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.005
258 Thalipasi 14 472 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.009
259 Thalipasi 14 473 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.022
260 Thalipasi 14 474 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.006
261 Thalipasi 14 475 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.026
262 Thalipasi 14 476 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.012
263 Thalipasi 14 477 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.043
264 Thalipasi 14 478 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.013
265 Thalipasi 14 479 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.019
266 Thalipasi 14 480 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.016
267 Thalipasi 14 481 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.021
268 Thalipasi 14 482 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.024
269 Thalipasi 14 483 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Gharabari 0.056
270 Thalipasi 18 495 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
271 Thalipasi 46/10 500 Digambar Sahu S/o Ratnakar Sahu Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.047
272 Thalipasi 2 501 Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
273 Thalipasi 3 502 Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
274 Thalipasi 42 503 Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.055
275 Thalipasi 3 510 Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.126
276 Thalipasi 2 511 Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.111
277 Thalipasi 42 512 Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.062
278 Thalipasi 40 513 Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
279 Thalipasi 23 514 Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
280 Thalipasi 3 515 Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.063
281 Thalipasi 2 516 Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
282 Thalipasi 12 522 Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.190
283 Thalipasi 18 523 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.080
284 Thalipasi 18 524 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.086
285 Thalipasi 18 525 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.088
286 Thalipasi 18 526 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.050
287 Thalipasi 18 527 Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.058
288 Thalipasi 12 528 Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.080
289 Thalipasi 23 529 Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
290 Thalipasi 40 530 Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
291 Thalipasi 3 531 Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.040
292 Thalipasi 2 532 Uchhab Sahoo S/o kalyan Sahoo Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
293 Thalipasi 11 533 Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others Patita 0.024
294 Thalipasi 11 534 Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
295 Thalipasi 24 535 Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
296 Thalipasi 24 536 Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
297 Thalipasi 10 539 Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.070
298 Thalipasi 10 540 Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.051
299 Thalipasi 10 543 Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.169
300 Thalipasi 10 544 Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.171
301 Thalipasi 10 548 Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.044
302 Thalipasi 14 549 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.050
303 Thalipasi 20 550 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Patita 0.018
304 Thalipasi 14 551 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Patita 0.096
305 Thalipasi 20 552 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.036
306 Thalipasi 20 553 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.015
307 Thalipasi 14 561 Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali 0.001
308 Thalipasi 20 569 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
309 Thalipasi 20 570 Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others Taila 0.216
310 Thalipasi 46/5 576 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu Taila 0.487
311 Thalipasi 46/5 577 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu Taila 0.140
312 Thalipasi 46/5 578 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu Patita 0.013
313 Thalipasi 30 579 Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others Gharabari 0.132
314 Thalipasi 30 580 Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others Gharabari 0.121
315 Thalipasi 46/7 581 Manoj Kumar Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan Taila 0.028
316 Thalipasi 46/8 582 Kumuda Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan Taila 0.046
317 Thalipasi 46/9 583 Chabila Kumar Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan Taila 0.039
Total : Village- Thalipasi 20.555
1 Bimbadharpur 22 6 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 1.150
2 Bimbadharpur 16 7 Nisamani Sadangi W/o. Balkrishna Sadangi Taila 0.387
3 Bimbadharpur 16 8 Nisamani Sadangi W/o. Balkrishna Sadangi Taila 0.419
4 Bimbadharpur 22 12 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 0.147
5 Bimbadharpur 22 13 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 0.157
6 Bimbadharpur 22 14 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 0.456
7 Bimbadharpur 22 15 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 0.132
8 Bimbadharpur 29 16 Saroj Naik S/o Sardar Naik and Others Taila 0.104
9 Bimbadharpur 34/10 18 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.274
10 Bimbadharpur 34/10 20 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.226
11 Bimbadharpur 34/5 21 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.146
12 Bimbadharpur 34/34 22 Sisir Kumar Behera S/o Kalia Behera Taila 0.139
13 Bimbadharpur 10 23 Trinath Naik S/o. Beda Naik and Others Taila 0.056
14 Bimbadharpur 7 29 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others Taila 0.113
15 Bimbadharpur 7 30 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others Taila 0.232
16 Bimbadharpur 27 31 Ratana Naik S/o Kalia Naik and Others Taila 0.584
17 Bimbadharpur 20 32 Bikala Bagh S/o. Mulia Bagh and Others Taila 0.505
18 Bimbadharpur 34/9 33 Uma Naik W/o. Kalyan Naik Taila 0.515
19 Bimbadharpur 17 39 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
20 Bimbadharpur 17 40 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
21 Bimbadharpur 17 41 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
22 Bimbadharpur 17 44 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
23 Bimbadharpur 17 45 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
24 Bimbadharpur 17 46 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.020
25 Bimbadharpur 17 47 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.091
26 Bimbadharpur 17 48 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
27 Bimbadharpur 17 49 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.063
28 Bimbadharpur 17 50 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.084
29 Bimbadharpur 17 51 Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.082
30 Bimbadharpur 4 52 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.079
31 Bimbadharpur 4 53 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Sarada Jalasachita 0.069
Jogendra sahu and Others Ek Fasali
32 Bimbadharpur 4 54 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
33 Bimbadharpur 4 55 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
34 Bimbadharpur 4 56 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
35 Bimbadharpur 4 57 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.032
36 Bimbadharpur 4 58 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.057
37 Bimbadharpur 2 59 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
38 Bimbadharpur 15 60 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Taila 0.274
39 Bimbadharpur 8 61 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.123
40 Bimbadharpur 8 62 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.121
41 Bimbadharpur 34/8 63 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan sahu Taila 0.279
42 Bimbadharpur 8 64 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.105
43 Bimbadharpur 8 65 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.106
44 Bimbadharpur 8 66 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.109
45 Bimbadharpur 8 67 Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others Taila 0.401
46 Bimbadharpur 1 78 Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan Taila 0.079
47 Bimbadharpur 1 80 Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.130
48 Bimbadharpur 1 81 Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan Taila 0.270
49 Bimbadharpur 31 82 Srinibas Naik S/o Balaka Naik Taila 0.308
50 Bimbadharpur 34/17 83 Saroj Kumar Behera S/o Ragunath Behera and Others Taila 0.220
51 Bimbadharpur 7 84 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others Taila 0.157
52 Bimbadharpur 34/7 105 Satyanarayana Sahu S/o. Bhajaman Sahu Taila 0.342
53 Bimbadharpur 14 106 Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others Taila 0.119
54 Bimbadharpur 14 107 Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others Taila 0.180
55 Bimbadharpur 14 108 Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others Taila 0.136
56 Bimbadharpur 26 114 Maheswar Sahu S/o. Dasarathi Sahu and Others Taila 0.517
57 Bimbadharpur 30 116 Sarangadhar Sahu S/o Banguru Sahu Taila 0.294
58 Bimbadharpur 9 121 Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.288
59 Bimbadharpur 34 123 Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others Taila 0.222
60 Bimbadharpur 34 128 Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.220
61 Bimbadharpur 34 129 Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
62 Bimbadharpur 34 130 Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
63 Bimbadharpur 5 131 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.188
64 Bimbadharpur 5 132 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Taila 0.163
65 Bimbadharpur 5 133 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.064
66 Bimbadharpur 5 134 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.016
67 Bimbadharpur 5 135 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.071
68 Bimbadharpur 5 136 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
69 Bimbadharpur 5 137 Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha Taila 0.434
70 Bimbadharpur 3 139 Kishori Pradhan S/o. Nata Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.614
71 Bimbadharpur 33 150 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.060
72 Bimbadharpur 33 151 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.045
73 Bimbadharpur 33 152 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.061
74 Bimbadharpur 33 153 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.037
75 Bimbadharpur 33 154 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.030
76 Bimbadharpur 33 156 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.322
77 Bimbadharpur 33 157 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.104
78 Bimbadharpur 33 158 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.130
79 Bimbadharpur 33 159 Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others Taila 0.160
80 Bimbadharpur 19 160 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and others Taila 1.238
81 Bimbadharpur 22 166 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Taila 0.726
82 Bimbadharpur 25 168 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.095
83 Bimbadharpur 25 169 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.085
84 Bimbadharpur 25 173 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
85 Bimbadharpur 25 174 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
86 Bimbadharpur 25 175 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.099
87 Bimbadharpur 25 176 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.124
88 Bimbadharpur 25 177 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
89 Bimbadharpur 25 178 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
90 Bimbadharpur 25 179 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.018
91 Bimbadharpur 25 180 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
92 Bimbadharpur 25 181 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.026
93 Bimbadharpur 25 182 Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan Taila 0.062
94 Bimbadharpur 6 183 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.087
95 Bimbadharpur 15 184 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Taila 0.077
96 Bimbadharpur 21 185 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Taila 0.076
97 Bimbadharpur 2 186 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.100
98 Bimbadharpur 2 187 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.121
99 Bimbadharpur 11 188 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.075
100 Bimbadharpur 11 189 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.072
101 Bimbadharpur 11 190 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.090
102 Bimbadharpur 23 191 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.100
103 Bimbadharpur 23 192 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.091
104 Bimbadharpur 18 193 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.113
105 Bimbadharpur 18 194 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.133
106 Bimbadharpur 21 195 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Taila 0.214
107 Bimbadharpur 22 196 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Patita 0.008
108 Bimbadharpur 23 197 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
109 Bimbadharpur 23 198 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.050
110 Bimbadharpur 23 199 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.046
111 Bimbadharpur 23 200 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.046
112 Bimbadharpur 23 201 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
113 Bimbadharpur 23 202 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
114 Bimbadharpur 23 203 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.072
115 Bimbadharpur 23 204 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
116 Bimbadharpur 23 205 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
117 Bimbadharpur 23 206 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.069
118 Bimbadharpur 23 207 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
119 Bimbadharpur 23 208 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
120 Bimbadharpur 23 209 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
121 Bimbadharpur 23 210 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
122 Bimbadharpur 23 211 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.083
123 Bimbadharpur 23 212 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.049
124 Bimbadharpur 23 213 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.036
125 Bimbadharpur 23 214 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
126 Bimbadharpur 23 215 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
127 Bimbadharpur 23 216 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
128 Bimbadharpur 23 217 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
129 Bimbadharpur 23 218 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
130 Bimbadharpur 23 219 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.021
131 Bimbadharpur 23 220 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.024
132 Bimbadharpur 23 221 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
133 Bimbadharpur 22 222 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others Patita 0.060
134 Bimbadharpur 23 223 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
135 Bimbadharpur 23 224 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
136 Bimbadharpur 21 225 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.423
137 Bimbadharpur 21 226 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
138 Bimbadharpur 21 227 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
139 Bimbadharpur 21 228 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.037
140 Bimbadharpur 21 229 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.031
141 Bimbadharpur 21 230 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
142 Bimbadharpur 21 231 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
143 Bimbadharpur 18 232 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
144 Bimbadharpur 18 233 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
145 Bimbadharpur 18 234 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
146 Bimbadharpur 18 235 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.032
147 Bimbadharpur 18 236 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.035
148 Bimbadharpur 18 237 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.153
149 Bimbadharpur 18 238 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
150 Bimbadharpur 18 239 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
151 Bimbadharpur 18 240 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
152 Bimbadharpur 18 241 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.035
153 Bimbadharpur 18 242 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.140
154 Bimbadharpur 15 243 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.143
155 Bimbadharpur 15 244 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.137
156 Bimbadharpur 15 245 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.118
157 Bimbadharpur 15 246 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.116
158 Bimbadharpur 15 247 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.111
159 Bimbadharpur 15 248 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.115
160 Bimbadharpur 15 249 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.047
161 Bimbadharpur 15 250 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.047
162 Bimbadharpur 6 251 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
163 Bimbadharpur 6 252 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.082
164 Bimbadharpur 6 253 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.074
165 Bimbadharpur 6 254 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.069
166 Bimbadharpur 6 255 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Sarada Jalasachita 0.111
Benudhar Pradhan and Others Ek Fasali
167 Bimbadharpur 34/21 256 Janak Dehury S/o Mulia Dehury Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.120
168 Bimbadharpur 6 257 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.249
169 Bimbadharpur 11 258 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.059
170 Bimbadharpur 11 259 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.015
171 Bimbadharpur 11 260 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.009
172 Bimbadharpur 11 261 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.016
173 Bimbadharpur 11 262 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.018
174 Bimbadharpur 2 263 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.053
175 Bimbadharpur 2 264 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.041
176 Bimbadharpur 2 265 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.227
177 Bimbadharpur 2 266 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.087
178 Bimbadharpur 2 267 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.101
179 Bimbadharpur 11 268 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.115
180 Bimbadharpur 11 269 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.105
181 Bimbadharpur 11 270 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.070
182 Bimbadharpur 11 271 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.038
183 Bimbadharpur 11 272 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.091
184 Bimbadharpur 11 273 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.098
185 Bimbadharpur 11 274 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.092
186 Bimbadharpur 2 275 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.070
187 Bimbadharpur 2 276 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.107
188 Bimbadharpur 2 277 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.024
189 Bimbadharpur 2 278 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.025
190 Bimbadharpur 2 279 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Sarada Jalasachita 0.023
Pradhan and Others Ek Fasali
191 Bimbadharpur 2 280 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.078
192 Bimbadharpur 2 281 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
193 Bimbadharpur 11 282 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
194 Bimbadharpur 11 283 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.019
195 Bimbadharpur 11 284 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.023
196 Bimbadharpur 11 285 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.039
197 Bimbadharpur 11 286 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.033
198 Bimbadharpur 11 287 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
199 Bimbadharpur 11 288 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.049
200 Bimbadharpur 11 289 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
201 Bimbadharpur 2 290 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
202 Bimbadharpur 2 291 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.052
203 Bimbadharpur 11 292 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
204 Bimbadharpur 11 293 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.015
205 Bimbadharpur 11 294 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.018
206 Bimbadharpur 11 295 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
207 Bimbadharpur 11 296 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.020
208 Bimbadharpur 11 297 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.107
209 Bimbadharpur 11 298 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.110
210 Bimbadharpur 11 299 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.110
211 Bimbadharpur 11 300 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.062
212 Bimbadharpur 11 301 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.093
213 Bimbadharpur 11 302 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.067
214 Bimbadharpur 11 303 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.051
215 Bimbadharpur 11 304 Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others Taila 0.160
216 Bimbadharpur 23 305 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.035
217 Bimbadharpur 23 306 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.129
218 Bimbadharpur 23 307 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.165
219 Bimbadharpur 23 308 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.159
220 Bimbadharpur 23 309 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Taila 0.158
221 Bimbadharpur 18 312 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.049
222 Bimbadharpur 18 313 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.056
223 Bimbadharpur 18 314 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.040
224 Bimbadharpur 18 315 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.045
225 Bimbadharpur 18 316 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.040
226 Bimbadharpur 18 317 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.043
227 Bimbadharpur 18 318 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.041
228 Bimbadharpur 18 319 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.026
229 Bimbadharpur 18 320 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.057
230 Bimbadharpur 18 321 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.037
231 Bimbadharpur 18 322 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.037
232 Bimbadharpur 18 323 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.039
233 Bimbadharpur 18 324 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.081
234 Bimbadharpur 6 325 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.078
235 Bimbadharpur 18 326 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.070
236 Bimbadharpur 21 327 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Taila 0.210
237 Bimbadharpur 15 328 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Taila 0.171
238 Bimbadharpur 21 333 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Taila 0.161
239 Bimbadharpur 6 334 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.123
240 Bimbadharpur 6 335 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.056
241 Bimbadharpur 6 336 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.119
242 Bimbadharpur 2 337 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.179
243 Bimbadharpur 2 338 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.171
244 Bimbadharpur 2 339 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.114
245 Bimbadharpur 2 340 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.086
246 Bimbadharpur 2 341 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
247 Bimbadharpur 2 342 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.028
248 Bimbadharpur 2 343 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
249 Bimbadharpur 2 344 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.022
250 Bimbadharpur 6 345 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.044
251 Bimbadharpur 6 346 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.034
252 Bimbadharpur 6 347 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
253 Bimbadharpur 6 348 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
254 Bimbadharpur 6 349 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
255 Bimbadharpur 6 350 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.029
256 Bimbadharpur 6 351 GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.051
257 Bimbadharpur 4 352 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Taila 0.112
258 Bimbadharpur 9 353 Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan Taila 0.146
259 Bimbadharpur 18 354 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
260 Bimbadharpur 18 355 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.065
261 Bimbadharpur 18 356 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.027
262 Bimbadharpur 18 357 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.076
263 Bimbadharpur 23 358 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.071
264 Bimbadharpur 23 359 Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.099
265 Bimbadharpur 9 360 Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.013
266 Bimbadharpur 9 361 Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan Taila 0.049
267 Bimbadharpur 15 366 Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others Patita 0.065
268 Bimbadharpur 24 367 Baishnab Pradhan S/o. Nityananda Pradhan and Others Taila 0.394
269 Bimbadharpur 24 368 Baishnab Pradhan S/o. Nityananda Pradhan and Others Taila 0.022
270 Bimbadharpur 4 369 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Taila 0.277
271 Bimbadharpur 4 370 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Taila 0.079
272 Bimbadharpur 4 371 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Taila 0.066
273 Bimbadharpur 4 372 Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others Taila 0.158
274 Bimbadharpur 21 377 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.172
275 Bimbadharpur 21 378 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.203
276 Bimbadharpur 21 379 Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.048
277 Bimbadharpur 18 381 Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others Taila 0.403
278 Bimbadharpur 2 382 Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others Taila 0.308
279 Bimbadharpur 34/5 395 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.769
280 Bimbadharpur 34/2 396 Bholaswar Sahu S/o Baguru Sahu Taila 0.362
281 Bimbadharpur 34/4 397 Binodini Rauta W/o Vaishnab Rauta Taila 0.320
282 Bimbadharpur 34/6 398 Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.345
283 Bimbadharpur 34/8 399 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan sahu Taila 0.240
284 Bimbadharpur 34/11 401 Gandharba Naik S/o Kurtartha Naik Taila 0.267
285 Bimbadharpur 34/11 402 Gandharba Naik S/o Kurtartha Naik Taila 0.151
286 Bimbadharpur 34/12 403 Ranjan Kumar Behera S/o Kandarpa Behera Taila 0.159
287 Bimbadharpur 34/10 404 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.051
288 Bimbadharpur 34/10 405 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.053
289 Bimbadharpur 34/10 406 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.038
290 Bimbadharpur 34/10 407 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.029
291 Bimbadharpur 34/10 408 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.040
292 Bimbadharpur 34/10 409 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.081
293 Bimbadharpur 34/10 410 Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.110
294 Bimbadharpur 34/13 411 Arun Kumar Naik S/o Harihara Naik Taila 0.090
295 Bimbadharpur 34/14 412 Sabita Sahu W/o Jagabandhu Sahu Taila 0.055
296 Bimbadharpur 34/15 413 Hatakisora Pradhan S/o Dayanidhi Pradhan Taila 0.019
297 Bimbadharpur 34/16 414 Sanatana Baga S/o Khiti Baga Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.077
298 Bimbadharpur 34/18 415 Sarathi Sahu S/o Goura Sahu Taila 0.038
299 Bimbadharpur 34/19 416 Bhagabat Sahu S/o Bala Sahu Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.016
300 Bimbadharpur 34/20 417 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.116
301 Bimbadharpur 34/22 418 Dharmendra Sahu S/o Rabindra Sahu Taila 0.108
302 Bimbadharpur 34/23 419 Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Raj Sahu Taila 0.062
303 Bimbadharpur 34/24 420 Ranjita Pradhan S/o Haramohan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.011
304 Bimbadharpur 34/24 421 Ranjita Pradhan S/o Haramohan Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.014
305 Bimbadharpur 34/25 422 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.183
306 Bimbadharpur 34/25 423 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.106
307 Bimbadharpur 34/25 424 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.044
308 Bimbadharpur 34/28 425 Tukuna Naik S/o Dilaswar Naik Taila 0.047
309 Bimbadharpur 34/26 426 Praful Kumar Sethi S/o Bauribandhu Sethi Taila 0.049
310 Bimbadharpur 34/27 427 Kuntala Behera W/o Sachidananda Behera Taila 0.033
311 Bimbadharpur 34/29 428 Binapani Pradhan W/o Kalpaswar Sahu Taila 0.179
312 Bimbadharpur 34/30 429 Gangadhar Baga S/o Bikal Baga Taila 0.017
313 Bimbadharpur 34/31 430 Dharanidhar Baga S/o Bikal Baga Taila 0.017
314 Bimbadharpur 34/32 431 Sulochana Mahakuda W/o Bidyadhar Mahakuda Taila 0.020
315 Bimbadharpur 34/33 432 Rebati Rauta W/o TanuChandra Rauta Taila 0.020
Total : Village – Bimbadharpur 35.724
1 Kudapasi 114/27 3 Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.291
2 Kudapasi 12 4 Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik Taila 0.279
3 Kudapasi 111 6 Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy Taila 0.181
4 Kudapasi 111 7 Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy Taila 0.072
5 Kudapasi 111 8 Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy Taila 0.105
6 Kudapasi 111 9 Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy Taila 0.122
7 Kudapasi 107 23 Shriram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy Taila 0.088
8 Kudapasi 94 41 Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi Taila 0.123
9 Kudapasi 94 42 Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi Taila 1.011
10 Kudapasi 102 43 Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Taila 0.161
11 Kudapasi 102 44 Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Taila 0.107
12 Kudapasi 102 45 Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Taila 0.081
13 Kudapasi 102 46 Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Patita 0.043
14 Kudapasi 68 48 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi patita 0.032
15 Kudapasi 68 49 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.086
16 Kudapasi 68 50 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
17 Kudapasi 68 51 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.040
18 Kudapasi 68 57 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
19 Kudapasi 68 58 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
20 Kudapasi 68 59 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
21 Kudapasi 68 60 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.028
22 Kudapasi 68 61 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.026
23 Kudapasi 68 64 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.057
24 Kudapasi 68 65 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.026
25 Kudapasi 68 66 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.068
26 Kudapasi 68 67 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Patita 0.052
27 Kudapasi 68 76 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.038
28 Kudapasi 68 77 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.082
29 Kudapasi 68 78 Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi Patita 0.145
30 Kudapasi 16 79 Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban Majhi Taila 0.695
31 Kudapasi 16 80 Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban Majhi Taila 0.227
32 Kudapasi 77 81 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Taila 0.308
33 Kudapasi 50 83 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Taila 0.307
34 Kudapasi 114 84 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Taila 0.315
35 Kudapasi 66 98 Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Taila 0.071
36 Kudapasi 66 99 Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Taila 0.101
37 Kudapasi 114/27 103 Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.420
38 Kudapasi 40 104 Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu Taila 0.282
39 Kudapasi 13 107 Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu Taila 0.080
40 Kudapasi 40 109 Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu Taila 0.205
41 Kudapasi 114/33 115 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.275
42 Kudapasi 114/40 116 Manmohan Pradhan S/o Gadadhar Pradhan Taila 0.046
43 Kudapasi 114/8 117 Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik Taila 0.085
44 Kudapasi 87 122 Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.075
45 Kudapasi 87 123 Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.157
46 Kudapasi 87 125 Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu Taila 0.164
47 Kudapasi 87 126 Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu Taila 0.143
48 Kudapasi 72 128 Balram Majhi S/o Chaitanya Majhi and Others Taila 0.175
49 Kudapasi 73 133 Basudev Sahu S/o Nanda Sahu and Others Taila 0.449
50 Kudapasi 43 136 Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu Taila 0.100
51 Kudapasi 25 137 Choudhary Sahu S/o Nityananda Sahu and Others Taila 0.164
52 Kudapasi 43 138 Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu Taila 0.083
53 Kudapasi 30 142 Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and Others Taila 0.527
54 Kudapasi 30 143 Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and Others Taila 0.048
55 Kudapasi 84 144 Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi and Others Taila 0.420
56 Kudapasi 81 166 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Taila 0.756
57 Kudapasi 39 179 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.216
58 Kudapasi 39 180 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Patita 0.024
59 Kudapasi 39 181 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Patita 0.009
60 Kudapasi 39 182 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.131
61 Kudapasi 39 183 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Patita 0.009
62 Kudapasi 39 184 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Taila 0.177
63 Kudapasi 39 185 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Bagayat Dei 0.062
64 Kudapasi 39 187 Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.043
65 Kudapasi 79 189 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.030
66 Kudapasi 79 190 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.045
67 Kudapasi 79 191 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.017
68 Kudapasi 79 192 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.017
69 Kudapasi 79 194 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.383
70 Kudapasi 79 195 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.197
71 Kudapasi 79 196 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.169
72 Kudapasi 75 197 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.018
73 Kudapasi 79 198 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Patita 0.014
74 Kudapasi 79 199 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Patita 0.014
75 Kudapasi 79 200 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.206
76 Kudapasi 79 201 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.315
77 Kudapasi 79 202 Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.675
78 Kudapasi 23 204 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.016
79 Kudapasi 114/65 206 Biswanath Sethi S/o Kailash Sethi Taila 0.145
80 Kudapasi 1 215 Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.232
81 Kudapasi 75 222 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Taila 0.040
82 Kudapasi 74 224 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.042
83 Kudapasi 74 225 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.137
84 Kudapasi 75 226 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.061
85 Kudapasi 75 227 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.195
86 Kudapasi 75 229 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Patita 0.030
87 Kudapasi 75 231 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Patita 0.031
88 Kudapasi 75 232 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.113
89 Kudapasi 75 233 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Patita 0.016
90 Kudapasi 75 234 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.066
91 Kudapasi 81 235 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.040
92 Kudapasi 81 236 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.039
93 Kudapasi 75 237 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.044
94 Kudapasi 81 240 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.045
95 Kudapasi 81 241 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Patita 0.020
96 Kudapasi 81 242 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Sarada 0.150
Pradhan and Others Anajalasachita Tini
97 Kudapasi 81 243 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Patita 0.008
98 Kudapasi 81 244 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.086
99 Kudapasi 81 245 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.098
100 Kudapasi 81 246 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Patita 0.012
101 Kudapasi 81 247 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Patita 0.010
102 Kudapasi 81 248 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.072
103 Kudapasi 81 249 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.079
104 Kudapasi 81 253 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.116
105 Kudapasi 81 254 Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others Patita 0.025
106 Kudapasi 75 260 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.181
107 Kudapasi 75 263 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.151
108 Kudapasi 75 265 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Patita 0.013
109 Kudapasi 75 266 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Patita 0.012
110 Kudapasi 75 267 Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.160
111 Kudapasi 47 273 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.228
112 Kudapasi 47 274 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.233
113 Kudapasi 47 275 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.247
114 Kudapasi 47 276 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.075
115 Kudapasi 47 277 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.132
116 Kudapasi 47 278 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.106
117 Kudapasi 47 279 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.283
118 Kudapasi 47 280 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.285
119 Kudapasi 47 281 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.028
120 Kudapasi 47 282 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.019
121 Kudapasi 54 283 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.091
122 Kudapasi 54 284 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.080
123 Kudapasi 114/16 289 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.021
124 Kudapasi 114/16 290 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.022
125 Kudapasi 114/16 291 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.046
126 Kudapasi 114/16 292 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Taila 0.011
127 Kudapasi 114/16 293 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.010
128 Kudapasi 114/16 295 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Taila 0.007
129 Kudapasi 54 297 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.065
130 Kudapasi 114/33 298 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.030
131 Kudapasi 54 299 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.027
132 Kudapasi 114/33 300 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.014
133 Kudapasi 54 301 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.029
134 Kudapasi 54 302 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.089
135 Kudapasi 114/16 303 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.037
136 Kudapasi 114/16 304 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.042
137 Kudapasi 114/16 305 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.098
138 Kudapasi 54 306 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Dei 0.033
139 Kudapasi 54 307 Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others Taila 0.044
140 Kudapasi 114/33 309 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.107
141 Kudapasi 114/86 317 Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.036
142 Kudapasi 114/86 318 Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.016
143 Kudapasi 114/73 319 Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik Patita 0.053
144 Kudapasi 114/33 320 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.255
145 Kudapasi 47 347 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.043
146 Kudapasi 47 348 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.106
147 Kudapasi 47 349 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Sarada 0.230
Others Anajalasachita Tini
148 Kudapasi 47 350 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.065
149 Kudapasi 47 351 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.186
150 Kudapasi 47 352 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.018
151 Kudapasi 47 353 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.157
152 Kudapasi 47 354 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.143
153 Kudapasi 47 355 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.040
154 Kudapasi 47 356 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.121
155 Kudapasi 47 357 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.029
156 Kudapasi 47 358 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.127
157 Kudapasi 47 359 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Patita 0.028
158 Kudapasi 47 360 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.116
159 Kudapasi 47 361 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.121
160 Kudapasi 114/24 364 Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout Taila 0.155
161 Kudapasi 114/24 365 Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout Taila 0.126
162 Kudapasi 99 367 Sarthi Pradhan S/o Siba pradhan Taila 0.182
163 Kudapasi 46 370 Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni sahu Taila 0.259
164 Kudapasi 114/79 371 Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Gaura Chandra Sahu Taila 0.082
165 Kudapasi 88 375 Mahi Dehury S/o Ram Dehury Taila 0.101
166 Kudapasi 10 377 Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury and Others Taila 0.114
167 Kudapasi 10 378 Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury and Others Taila 0.319
168 Kudapasi 114/29 379 Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam Mallick Taila 0.251
169 Kudapasi 58 380 Palau Sahu S/o Natabar Sahu and Others Taila 0.397
170 Kudapasi 23 381 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.233
171 Kudapasi 57 382 Palau Sahu S/o Nata Sahu Taila 0.211
172 Kudapasi 28 386 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.049
173 Kudapasi 28 387 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.081
174 Kudapasi 28 388 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.201
175 Kudapasi 28 389 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.207
176 Kudapasi 28 390 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.051
177 Kudapasi 28 391 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.067
178 Kudapasi 28 392 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.102
179 Kudapasi 28 393 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.099
180 Kudapasi 29 395 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others Taila 0.110
181 Kudapasi 29 396 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others Taila 0.193
182 Kudapasi 29 397 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others Taila 0.050
183 Kudapasi 28 398 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari Taila 0.046
184 Kudapasi 29 400 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others Taila 0.109
185 Kudapasi 29 401 Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others Taila 0.089
186 Kudapasi 114/42 402 Pradip Pradhan S/o Trilochan Pradhan Taila 0.097
187 Kudapasi 114/43 404 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.164
188 Kudapasi 24 405 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.176
189 Kudapasi 24 406 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.081
190 Kudapasi 24 407 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.038
191 Kudapasi 71 408 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.031
192 Kudapasi 71 409 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.016
193 Kudapasi 71 410 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.019
194 Kudapasi 24 411 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.040
195 Kudapasi 24 412 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.070
196 Kudapasi 24 413 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.029
197 Kudapasi 24 414 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.064
198 Kudapasi 24 415 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.087
199 Kudapasi 24 416 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.059
200 Kudapasi 71 417 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.057
201 Kudapasi 71 418 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.043
202 Kudapasi 11 420 Kalandi Shau S/o Sadhaba Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.229
203 Kudapasi 70 421 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.156
204 Kudapasi 70 422 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu Patita 0.020
205 Kudapasi 70 423 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.160
206 Kudapasi 70 424 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu Patita 0.027
207 Kudapasi 114/27 425 Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.056
208 Kudapasi 114/27 426 Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.162
209 Kudapasi 12 427 Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik Taila 0.149
210 Kudapasi 114/33 428 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.035
211 Kudapasi 114/33 429 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.032
212 Kudapasi 53 430 Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna Naik Taila 0.064
213 Kudapasi 12 431 Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.062
214 Kudapasi 12 432 Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik Taila 0.053
215 Kudapasi 114/48 434 Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Taila 0.018
216 Kudapasi 114/50 435 Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna Sahu Taila 0.037
217 Kudapasi 71 437 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.355
218 Kudapasi 71 438 Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others Taila 0.065
219 Kudapasi 114/48 439 Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Taila 0.056
220 Kudapasi 114/48 440 Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Taila 0.036
221 Kudapasi 114/50 441 Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna Sahu Taila 0.070
222 Kudapasi 114/49 442 Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu Taila 0.032
223 Kudapasi 114/49 443 Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu Taila 0.023
224 Kudapasi 114/49 444 Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu Taila 0.045
225 Kudapasi 114/49 445 Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.029
226 Kudapasi 114/45 446 Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.041
227 Kudapasi 109 447 Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others Taila 0.023
228 Kudapasi 109 448 Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others Taila 0.025
229 Kudapasi 109 449 Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others Taila 0.015
230 Kudapasi 109 450 Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others Taila 0.021
231 Kudapasi 43 452 Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.041
232 Kudapasi 43 453 Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu Taila 0.018
233 Kudapasi 114/43 454 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.050
234 Kudapasi 114/43 499 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.018
235 Kudapasi 108 500 Sukanti Naik W/o Chaitanya Naik Taila 0.141
236 Kudapasi 114/43 501 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.022
237 Kudapasi 114/43 502 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.037
238 Kudapasi 114/43 503 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.053
239 Kudapasi 24 504 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others Taila 0.061
240 Kudapasi 114/43 505 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.058
241 Kudapasi 114/43 506 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.040
242 Kudapasi 114/43 507 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.072
243 Kudapasi 52 531 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.050
244 Kudapasi 52 532 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.077
245 Kudapasi 52 533 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.014
246 Kudapasi 52 534 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.062
247 Kudapasi 52 535 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.103
248 Kudapasi 52 536 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.119
249 Kudapasi 52 537 Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Patita 0.025
250 Kudapasi 114/48 538 Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.025
251 Kudapasi 114/45 539 Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.070
252 Kudapasi 50 540 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.039
253 Kudapasi 77 541 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.018
254 Kudapasi 77 542 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.018
255 Kudapasi 77 543 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.009
256 Kudapasi 50 544 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.011
257 Kudapasi 95 545 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.012
258 Kudapasi 50 546 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.015
259 Kudapasi 50 547 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.012
260 Kudapasi 95 548 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
261 Kudapasi 95 549 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.022
262 Kudapasi 50 550 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.084
263 Kudapasi 77 551 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.081
264 Kudapasi 114 552 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.027
265 Kudapasi 50 553 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.035
266 Kudapasi 114/26 554 Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.020
267 Kudapasi 61 555 Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.094
268 Kudapasi 77 556 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.097
269 Kudapasi 114 557 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.132
270 Kudapasi 77 558 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.044
271 Kudapasi 114 559 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.013
272 Kudapasi 114 560 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.027
273 Kudapasi 61 561 Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.041
274 Kudapasi 114 562 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.036
275 Kudapasi 77 563 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.034
276 Kudapasi 114 564 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.046
277 Kudapasi 77 565 Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.094
278 Kudapasi 50 566 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.077
279 Kudapasi 50 567 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.060
280 Kudapasi 50 568 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.016
281 Kudapasi 50 569 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.016
282 Kudapasi 50 570 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.011
283 Kudapasi 50 571 Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.021
284 Kudapasi 95 572 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.032
285 Kudapasi 95 573 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.016
286 Kudapasi 114/26 574 Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.020
287 Kudapasi 95 575 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.036
288 Kudapasi 95 576 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.122
289 Kudapasi 95 577 Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others Patita 0.007
290 Kudapasi 80 582 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Taila 0.055
291 Kudapasi 80 583 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Patita 0.036
292 Kudapasi 80 584 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.148
293 Kudapasi 80 585 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Taila 0.027
294 Kudapasi 80 586 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Taila 0.031
295 Kudapasi 80 587 Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.035
296 Kudapasi 17 594 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.052
297 Kudapasi 4 595 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.025
298 Kudapasi 4 596 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.053
299 Kudapasi 4 597 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.059
300 Kudapasi 4 598 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.048
301 Kudapasi 17 599 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.091
302 Kudapasi 17 606 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.058
303 Kudapasi 17 607 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.039
304 Kudapasi 4 616 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.040
305 Kudapasi 17 617 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.031
306 Kudapasi 22 618 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Taila 0.031
307 Kudapasi 22 619 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.072
308 Kudapasi 22 620 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.034
309 Kudapasi 114 621 Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.090
310 Kudapasi 17 622 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.093
311 Kudapasi 4 623 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.072
312 Kudapasi 22 624 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Taila 0.018
313 Kudapasi 22 625 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Taila 0.019
314 Kudapasi 17 626 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.022
315 Kudapasi 17 627 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu Taila 0.030
316 Kudapasi 4 628 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.022
317 Kudapasi 18 629 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.049
318 Kudapasi 18 630 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.018
319 Kudapasi 18 632 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.045
320 Kudapasi 33 633 Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu Taila 0.072
321 Kudapasi 65 637 Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu Taila 0.119
322 Kudapasi 18 638 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.035
323 Kudapasi 18 639 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.066
324 Kudapasi 18 640 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.064
325 Kudapasi 18 641 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.070
326 Kudapasi 18 642 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.011
327 Kudapasi 18 643 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.012
328 Kudapasi 18 644 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.011
329 Kudapasi 18 645 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.008
330 Kudapasi 18 646 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.028
331 Kudapasi 18 647 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.013
332 Kudapasi 18 648 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.025
333 Kudapasi 18 649 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.031
334 Kudapasi 18 650 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Taila 0.059
335 Kudapasi 18 651 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.042
336 Kudapasi 18 652 Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.043
337 Kudapasi 65 659 Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.127
338 Kudapasi 65 660 Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu Taila 0.097
339 Kudapasi 33 661 Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu Taila 0.109
340 Kudapasi 113 671 Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji Patita 0.042
341 Kudapasi 113 672 Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.040
342 Kudapasi 64 674 Prahalad sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Taila 0.445
343 Kudapasi 114/82 675 Surendra Chandra mali S/o Nilay mali Taila 0.167
344 Kudapasi 32 676 Dahana Naik S/o Chandal Naik Taila 0.387
345 Kudapasi 92 682 Rasananda Sahu S/o Buddhia Majhi and Others Taila 0.090
346 Kudapasi 113 686 Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji Taila 0.115
347 Kudapasi 113 688 Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.174
348 Kudapasi 113 689 Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji Taila 0.020
349 Kudapasi 78 692 Budhia Sahu S/o Anand Sahu Taila 0.001
350 Kudapasi 4 738 Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu Taila 0.023
351 Kudapasi 22 739 Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu Taila 0.031
352 Kudapasi 15 955 Keshab Sahu S/o Jagei sahu and Others Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.011
353 Kudapasi 114/31 956 Bhaghirathi Behera S/o Nabaghana Behera Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.001
354 Kudapasi 97 1227 Lochan Sahu S/o Jadu Sahu Taila 0.184
355 Kudapasi 53 1233 Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna Naik Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.040
356 Kudapasi 103 1234 Srinibas Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.247
357 Kudapasi 114/33 1235 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.337
358 Kudapasi 1 1236 Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.241
359 Kudapasi 114/71 1237 Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.320
360 Kudapasi 114/25 1238 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.161
361 Kudapasi 67 1239 Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.147
362 Kudapasi 67 1240 Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.102
363 Kudapasi 67 1243 Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.015
364 Kudapasi 114/84 1244 Satyabhama Sethi W/o Ghanashyam Sethi Taila 0.082
365 Kudapasi 1 1246 Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.132
366 Kudapasi 1 1247 Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.031
367 Kudapasi 1 1248 Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik Taila 0.230
368 Kudapasi 5 1249 Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and Others Taila 0.158
369 Kudapasi 114/41 1250 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik Taila 0.088
370 Kudapasi 5 1251 Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and Others Taila 0.075
371 Kudapasi 114/18 1253 Manorajan Naik S/o Chaitanya Naik Taila 0.091
372 Kudapasi 114/33 1254 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.036
373 Kudapasi 114/33 1255 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.057
374 Kudapasi 114/33 1256 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.193
375 Kudapasi 13 1258 Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu Taila 0.206
376 Kudapasi 89 1259 Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu Taila 0.074
377 Kudapasi 89 1260 Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu Taila 0.094
378 Kudapasi 40 1261 Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu Taila 0.164
379 Kudapasi 114/29 1262 Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam Mallick Taila 0.350
380 Kudapasi 114/69 1263 Durga Charan nayak S/o Patitapawan Nayak Gharabari 0.025
381 Kudapasi 93 1265 Ram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy Gharabari 0.020
382 Kudapasi 63 1266 Prahlad Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi Gharabari 0.022
383 Kudapasi 86 1268 Bholeswar Sahu S/o Banguru Sahu Gharabari 0.020
384 Kudapasi 42 1269 Niranjan Majhi S/o Bira Majhi Gharabari 0.017
385 Kudapasi 41 1271 Nimei Majhi S/o Thaka Majhi Gharabari 0.020
386 Kudapasi 114/77 1272 Bhallabh Chandra Pradhan S/o Haldhar Pradhan Gharabari 0.019
387 Kudapasi 6 1274 Kastu Bagha S/o Kamar Bagha Gharabari 0.015
388 Kudapasi 96 1275 Lachhaman Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Gharabari 0.018
389 Kudapasi 90 1277 Ramesh Naik S/o Kalia Naik Gharabari 0.017
390 Kudapasi 35 1282 Dolagovinda Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu Gharabari 0.020
391 Kudapasi 89 1284 Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu Gharabari 0.019
392 Kudapasi 114/22 1286 Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik Gharabari 0.015
393 Kudapasi 114/37 1288 Kaushalya Behera W/o Sujit Behera Gharabari 0.016
394 Kudapasi 55 1291 Pabitra Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu Gharabari 0.014
395 Kudapasi 34 1293 Duruju Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu Gharabari 0.012
396 Kudapasi 98 1295 Sarbeswar Matiari S/o Laxmi Dhar Matiari Gharabari 0.021
397 Kudapasi 112 1297 Sushant Pradhan S/o Nimei Pradhan and Others Gharabari 0.018
398 Kudapasi 114/6 1300 Chitanya Naik S/o Vishnaba Naik Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.123
399 Kudapasi 114/7 1301 Khiroda Kumar Maharana S/o Jatia Maharana Taila 0.081
400 Kudapasi 114/8 1302 Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik Taila 0.061
401 Kudapasi 114/41 1303 Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik Taila 0.090
402 Kudapasi 114/11 1304 Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Taila 0.138
403 Kudapasi 114/11 1305 Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu Taila 0.114
404 Kudapasi 114/12 1306 Patitapaban Naik S/o Jayakrushna Naik Taila 0.081
405 Kudapasi 114/13 1307 Manmohan Sahu S/o Sukru Sahu Taila 0.057
406 Kudapasi 114/16 1308 Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu Taila 0.045
407 Kudapasi 114/33 1309 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.231
408 Kudapasi 114/30 1314 Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra Rauta Taila 0.093
409 Kudapasi 114/33 1316 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.164
410 Kudapasi 114/33 1317 Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.129
411 Kudapasi 114/30 1318 Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra Rauta Taila 0.201
412 Kudapasi 114/34 1319 Pramila Naik S/o Kirtan Naik Taila 0.237
413 Kudapasi 114/38 1320 Binod Kumar Sahu S/o Madhusudhan Sahu Taila 0.090
414 Kudapasi 114/19 1321 Ganya ranjan Naik S/o Chitanya Naik Taila 0.158
415 Kudapasi 114/39 1322 Alok Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu Taila 0.066
416 Kudapasi 114/45 1324 Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.036
417 Kudapasi 114/46 1325 Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.049
418 Kudapasi 114/46 1326 Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu Sahu Taila 0.017
419 Kudapasi 114/47 1327 Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Taila 0.010
420 Kudapasi 114/47 1328 Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu Taila 0.005
421 Kudapasi 114/51 1329 Sasmitarani Pradhan W/o Umakant Majhi Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.184
422 Kudapasi 114/53 1330 Rasmita Sahu W/o Pradip Kumar Pradhan Taila 0.074
423 Kudapasi 114/54 1331 Ajit Kumar Dehuri S/o Duryadhan Dehuri Taila 0.045
424 Kudapasi 114/57 1333 Pitabas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu Taila 0.049
425 Kudapasi 114/58 1334 Sarathi Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu Taila 0.046
426 Kudapasi 114/59 1335 Srinibas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu Taila 0.048
427 Kudapasi 114/60 1336 Surath Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu Taila 0.038
428 Kudapasi 114/61 1337 Rakesh Ranjan Rauta S/o Prafful Kumar Rauta Taila 0.101
429 Kudapasi 114/63 1338 Rajkishor Dehuri S/o Maheswar Dehuri Taila 0.159
430 Kudapasi 114/81 1339 Prasant Kumar Sahu S/o Netrananda Sahu Taila 0.120
431 Kudapasi 114/64 1340 Santwona Mishra W/o Narendra Kumar Mishra Taila 0.048
432 Kudapasi 114/66 1341 Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu Taila 0.056
433 Kudapasi 114/66 1342 Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu Taila 0.018
434 Kudapasi 114/66 1343 Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.060
435 Kudapasi 114/67 1344 Chinmaya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera Taila 0.159
436 Kudapasi 114/68 1345 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera Taila 0.119
437 Kudapasi 114/68 1346 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera Taila 0.014
438 Kudapasi 114/68 1347 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera Taila 0.067
439 Kudapasi 114/70 1348 Susant Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu Taila 0.035
440 Kudapasi 114/39 1349 Alok Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu Taila 0.042
441 Kudapasi 114/73 1350 Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.015
442 Kudapasi 114/74 1351 Tikan Sahu S/o Dujyadhan Sahu Taila 0.111
443 Kudapasi 114/75 1352 Tuna Behera S/o Prakash Behera Taila 0.096
444 Kudapasi 114/76 1353 Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.385
445 Kudapasi 114/78 1354 Arun Pradhan S/o Mohan Pradhan Taila 0.105
446 Kudapasi 114/85 1356 Karunakar Mahapatra S/o Chandramani Mahapatra Taila 0.097
447 Kudapasi 84 1357 Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi and Others Gharabari 0.011
448 Kudapasi 114/87 1358 Satyananda Pradhan S/o Ghanashyama Pradhan and Others Taila 0.125
449 Kudapasi 114/88 1359 Uddhab Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu Sarada Anajalasachita Tini 0.009
450 Kudapasi 114/89 1360 Ranjan Behera S/o Ramesh Behera Taila 0.036
451 Kudapasi 114/90 1361 Rajat Kumar Behera S/o Ramesh Behera Taila 0.035
Total : Village – Kudapasi 42.488
1 Dhaurakhaman 11 5 Ghurudu Sahu S/o Butu Sahu Taila 0.441
2 Dhaurakhaman 43 10 Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi Taila 0.237
3 Dhaurakhaman 43 11 Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi Taila 0.340
4 Dhaurakhaman 43 12 Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi Taila 0.194
5 Dhaurakhaman 45/17 13 Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain Taila 0.771
6 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 15 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.748
7 Dhaurakhaman 8 16 Kasturi Sahu S/o Arkhita Dehuri and Others Taila 0.071
8 Dhaurakhaman 45/19 17 Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout Taila 0.149
9 Dhaurakhaman 45/19 18 Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout Taila 0.121
10 Dhaurakhaman 45/42 20 Sudarshan Dehuri S/o Dangi Dehuri Taila 0.375
11 Dhaurakhaman 24 21 Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat Sahu and Others Taila 0.358
12 Dhaurakhaman 28 40 Bairagi Sahu D/o Sabar Sahu Taila 0.479
13 Dhaurakhaman 24 53 Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat Sahu and Others Taila 1.637
14 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 54 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.022
15 Dhaurakhaman 45/17 84 Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain Taila 0.267
16 Dhaurakhaman 35 85 Milu Behera S/o Haldhar behera Taila 0.072
17 Dhaurakhaman 45/45 86 Prafulla Kumar Sethi S/o Bauri Bandhu Sethi Taila 0.101
18 Dhaurakhaman 45/41 87 Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant Kumar Behera and Others Taila 0.307
19 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 92 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.622
20 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 93 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.065
21 Dhaurakhaman 2 94 Antaryami Sahu S/o Dhani Sahu Taila 0.079
22 Dhaurakhaman 20 98 Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu Taila 0.136
23 Dhaurakhaman 22 99 Bauribandhu Dehuri s/o Panu Dehuri Taila 0.101
24 Dhaurakhaman 20 103 Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu Taila 0.170
25 Dhaurakhaman 45/17 104 Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain Taila 0.245
26 Dhaurakhaman 45/50 105 Vishnu Behera S/o Deenbandhu Behera Taila 0.039
27 Dhaurakhaman 14 224 Jay Krishna Pradhan S/o Daitari Pradhan Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali 0.153
28 Dhaurakhaman 45/2 563 Bhagirati Sahoo S/o Nepala Sahoo and Others Taila 0.037
29 Dhaurakhaman 45/3 566 Pranati Barik W/o Narayana Barik Taila 0.096
30 Dhaurakhaman 45/4 567 Pravati Barik W/o Akhya Kumar Barik Taila 0.036
31 Dhaurakhaman 45/8 571 Pravat Kiran Barik S/o Anukul Barik Taila 0.036
32 Dhaurakhaman 45/11 574 Panchali Barik W/o Pravat Kiran Barik Taila 0.026
33 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 575 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.347
34 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 578 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.521
35 Dhaurakhaman 45/12 579 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.129
36 Dhaurakhaman 45/13 580 Binodini Rauta W/o Vishnaba Rauta Taila 0.151
37 Dhaurakhaman 45/14 581 Basant Kumar Sahu S/o Bidyadhar Sahu Taila 0.049
38 Dhaurakhaman 45/15 582 Tikili Behera W/o Dambaru Behera Taila 0.142
39 Dhaurakhaman 45/17 584 Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain Taila 0.343
40 Dhaurakhaman 45/19 587 Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout Taila 0.120
41 Dhaurakhaman 45/21 588 Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. Taila 0.595
42 Dhaurakhaman 45/23 589 Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.102
43 Dhaurakhaman 45/23 590 Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.194
44 Dhaurakhaman 45/23 591 Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.101
45 Dhaurakhaman 45/23 592 Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu Taila 0.194
46 Dhaurakhaman 45/29 598 Dipendu Kumar Pradhan S/o Jadumani Pradhan Taila 0.114
47 Dhaurakhaman 45/31 600 Dhirendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bhask Sahu and Others Taila 0.440
48 Dhaurakhaman 45/49 612 Diptirani Barik W/o Barun Kumar Barik Taila 0.024
Total: Village - Dhaurakhaman 12.099
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2633 2634 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2635 2636 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2637 2638 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2639 2640 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2641 2642 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2643 2644 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2645 2646 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2647 2648 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2649 2650 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2651 2652 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2653 2654 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2655 2656 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2657 2658 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2659 2660 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2661 2662 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2663 2664 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2665 2666 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2667 2668 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2669 2670 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2671 2672 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2673 2674 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2675 2676 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2677

Boundary Description: The Naini Coal Block Boundary starts from Point No.1 which is located by the side of State Highway No. 63 and on the south bank of Gauduni Nala. Whence the boundary moves forward in South-East direction along the State Highway No.63 (towards Angul Town) up to point No.29. From point No.29 to Point No.136 the boundary takes left turn towards North-East direction, moving across the CHHENDIPADA RF and to reach point No.136, located on the R F boundary. From Point No.136 to Point No.A the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200. From Point No.A to Point No. C the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No.36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17. From Point No.C to Point No.E the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546. From Point No.E to Point No.I the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through Survey. No. 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to Point No.30 the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the boundary takes left turn towards North-West direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey. No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.35 the boundary further moved in North- West direction across the CHHENDIPADA RF to meet the Point No.35 located on the RF boundary. From Point No.35 to point No.1 the Boundary takes left turn towards South-West direction along the south bank of Gauduni Nala towards upstream and closed at Point No.1 whence the boundary started. (1) Village: TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.136, A and B. The village boundary line starts from Point No.136, which is situated close to the tri-junction point, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary and block boundary at Survey No.195. From Point No.136 to Point No. A, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.200. From Point No.A to Point No.B the village boundary moved in North-East direction covering the Survey No.200, 199, 195 and touching the Chhendipada RF boundary at Point No.B. From Point No.B to Point No.136 it is common boundary between TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF. (2) Village: KASIDIHA: Boundary bounded by Point No. A, C, D, and B. The village boundary line starts from Point No. A, which is situated at common point for Survey No.36 and Survey No.34. From Point No.A to Point No.C, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No. 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 touching the village boundary at North- East end at Survey No.17. From point No.C to Point No.D the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 and passing through tri-junction point, and moved along Survey No. 2, 1, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.D. From point No.D to Point No.B it is a common boundary between KASIDIHA village and CHHENDIPADA RF. The village boundary from Point No.B to Point No.A moves in South-West direction covering the Survey No.1, 30, 31, 32, 36 and closing the boundary at Point No.A. (3) Village: THALIPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. C, E, F, G and D. The village boundary line starts from Point No. C, which is situated at Survey No.20. From Point No.C to Point No.E, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 and 546 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.546. From point No.E to Point No.F the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.546, 545, 542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523. From point No.F to Point No.G the village boundary moved in West direction covering Survey No.510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403,2678 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, and 1 touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.G. From Point No.G to Point No.D it is common boundary between THALIPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.D to Point No.C the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and closing the boundary at Point No. C. (4) Village: BIMBADHARAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.G, F and H. The village boundary line starts from Point No.G which is close to tri-junction point and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF BOUNDARY. From Point No.G to Point No.F the village boundary moved in East direction covering the Survey No. 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379. From Point No.F to Point No.H the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, tri-junction point, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.H. From Point No.H to Point No.G it is common boundary between BIMBADHARAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF closing the boundary at Point No.G. (5) Village: KUDAPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. E, I, J, H and F. The village boundary line starts from Point No.E, which is situated close to the tri-junction point at Survey No.678. From Point No.E to Point No.I the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through Survey No.678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to Point No.J the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.461, tri- junction point, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, tri-junction point, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.J. From Point No.J to Point No.H it is common boundary between KUDAPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.H to Point No.F and Point No.E. the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353, 1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, tri-junction point, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, tri-junction point, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678 and closing the boundary at Point No.E. (6) Village: DHAURAKHAMAN: Boundary bounded by Point No. I, 30, 31 and J. The village boundary line starts from Point No.I, which is situated at Survey No.222. From Point No.I to Point No.30 the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the block boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.J it is common boundary between DHAURAKHAMAN village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.J to Point No.I the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, tri-junction point, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, tri-junction point, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, tri-junction point, 222, and closing the boundary at Point No.I.

[F. No. 43015/18/2015- LA & IR] RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2019

dkdkdkdk----vkvkvkvk---- 656656656656----&&&&dsUnzh ljdkj dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd] blls mikc) vuqlwph esa mfYyf[kr ifj{ks= dh

Hkwfe esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr fd, tkus dh laHkkouk gS; vkSj] js[kkad la[;k ,lbZLkh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 dk ftlesa mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe {ks= ds C;kSjs vUrfoZ"V gS] fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkÅl LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NÙrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nsrh gSA mijksDr mfYyf[kr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrcn~/k dksbZ O;fDr & ¼i½ laiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k mlds Åij fdlh vf/kdkj ds vtZu ij vk{ksi dj

ldsxk( vFkok

¼ii½ mDr vf/klwpuk dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu dh xbZ fdlh dk;ZokbZ ls gqbZ ;k lEHkor% gksus

okyh fdlh {kfr ds fy;s vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 ds v/khu izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxk( vFkok

¼iii½ mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu iwosZ{k.k vuqKfIr;ksa ds izHkkoghu gksus ds laca/k esa ;k mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu [kuu iV~Vs izHkkoghu gksus ds fy;s izfrdj dk[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2679 nkok dj ldsxk vkSj mls mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼i½ ls ¼iv½ esa fofufnZ"V enksa dh Ckkcr mixr O;; dks minf'kZr djus ds fy;s iwoksZDr Hkwfe ls lacaf/kr lHkh ekufp=ksa] pkVksZ vkSj vU; nLrkostksa dks ifjnRr dj ldsxk]

jkti= esa bl vf/klwpuk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls uCcs fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh ;k foHkkxk/;{k ¼jktLo½] lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ dks lqiqnZ djsxk A

vuqlwphvuqlwphvuqlwphvuqlwph egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½

Øe la- x zke dk uke x zke la[;k rglhy ftyk {ks= gsDVj es a fVIif.k;k
1- tjgh 103 izrkiiqj lqjtiqj 16.410 Hkkx
dqy % 16-410 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 40-55 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½

fVIi.kfVIi.kfVIi.kfVIi.k %%%% xzke tjgh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd;s tkus okys IykV la[;k% 33(Hkkx), 37@2] 38@1] 38@2] 39 ls 47] 53 ls 58] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 66(Hkkx), 67 ls 75] 341(Hkkx), 342(Hkkx), 483(Hkkx) ls 485(Hkkx), 486@1] 486@2] 487] 488(Hkkx), 489(Hkkx), 490] 491(Hkkx), 492@1 ls 492@4] 493@1]493@2] 494 ls 497] 498(Hkkx), 500(Hkkx), 501] 507(Hkkx), 553@1(Hkkx), 553@2] 555(Hkkx), 556(Hkkx), 557] 564@1 lss 564@3] 566(Hkkx), 582(Hkkx), 583(Hkkx), 585(Hkkx), 589(Hkkx), 590(Hkkx), 591 ls 595] 596(Hkkx), 597(Hkkx), 618(Hkkx) ls 620(Hkkx), 621 ls 623] 624(Hkkx), 625(Hkkx), 637(Hkkx), 638(Hkkx), 741(Hkkx), 748(Hkkx), 749] 750(Hkkx), 751(Hkkx), 752 ls 755] 756(Hkkx), 757(Hkkx), 760(Hkkx), 772(Hkkx).

lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu% Cykd & d%Cykd & d%Cykd & d%Cykd & d% d&[k js[kk fcUnq *d* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds if'peh Hkkx ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *[k* ij feyrh gSA [k&x js[kk fcUnq *[k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *x* ij feyrh gSA x&?k js[kk fcUnq *x* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *?k* ij feyrh gSA ?k&d js[kk fcUnq *?k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *d* ij feyrh gSA

Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% ³&p js[kk fcUnq *³* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas mRrjh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *p* ij feyrh gSA p&N js[kk fcUnq *p* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *N* ij feyrh gSA N&t js[kk fcUnq *N* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *t* ij feyrh gSA t&³ js[kk fcUnq *t* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *³* ij feyrh gSA

[Qk- la- 43015@06@2019&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj] jke f'kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo

New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2019

S.O. 656.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto; And whereas, the plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/527, dated the 19th March, 2019 containing details of the area of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Collector, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh). Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule. Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may- (i) object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land; or2680 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (ii) claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any action taken under sub -section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or

(iii) claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act, in respect of prospecting license ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act,

to the Officer-In-Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.

SCHEDULE

Mahamaya OCP Extension Block, Bhatgaon Area,

District- Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

Sl. No. Name of village Village number Tahsil District Area in hectares Remarks
1. Jarhi 103 Pratappur Surajpur 16.410 Part
Total: 16.410 hectares (approximately) or 40.55 acres (approximately)

Note : Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jarhi (Part): 33(P), 37/2, 38/1, 38/2, 39 to 47, 53 to 58, 61(P), 62(P), 66(P), 67 to 75, 341(P), 342(P), 483(P) to 485(P), 486/1, 486/2, 487, 488(P), 489(P), 490, 491(P), 492/1 to 492/4, 493/1, 493/2, 494 to 497, 498(P), 500(P), 501, 507(P), 553/1(P), 553/2, 555(P), 556(P), 557, 564/1 to 564/3, 566(P), 582(P), 583(P), 585(P), 589(P), 590(P), 591 to 595, 596(P), 597(P), 618(P) to 620(P), 621 to 623, 624(P), 625(P), 637(P), 638(P), 741(P), 748(P), 749, 750(P), 751(P), 752 to 755, 756(P), 757(P), 760(P), 772(P).

Boundary description:

Block – A :

A-B Line starts from point 'A' and passes in village Jarhi through western part of village Jarhi and meets at point 'B'.

B-C Line starts from point 'B' and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at point 'C'.

C-D Line starts from point 'C' and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'D'.

D-A Line starts from point 'D' and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at starting point 'A'.

Block – B:

E-F Line starts from point 'E' and passes in village Jarhi towards northern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at point 'F'.

F-G Line starts from point 'F' and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'G'.

G-H Line starts from point 'G' and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'H'.

H-E Line starts from point 'H' and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at starting point 'E'.

[F. No. 43015/ 06 /2019-LA&IR ]

RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2681

Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=ky;

ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 657-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iwoZ mRrj jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 64@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&41012@84@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019

S.O. 657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of East North Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-4-2019.

[No. L-41012/84/2016-IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.

ID. No. 64 of 2017

Zonal Working President, Rail Sewak Sangh, Through Sri D.P. Awasthi, 49, Tilak Nagar, Lucknow.

Versus

The Divisional Personnel Officer, East North Railway, DRM Office, Ashok Marg, Lucknow.

AWARD

1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification No. L-41012/84/2016-IR (B-I) dated 10.08.2017 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"KYA PURVOTTAR RAIL PRASHASHAN LUCKNOW DWARA SRI RAKESH KUMAR,

HELPER KHALASI KO USKI JOINING TITHI ( 25.08.98)SE SC/ST QUOTA KE TAHAT

MILNE WALI PADONNATI NA DEKAR USSE JUNIOR KO PADONNATI DIYA JANA

TATHA NYAYOCHIT AVAM VAID HAI? YADI NAHI TO KAMGAR KIS RAHAT KO

PANE KA HAQDAR HAI?"

2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated 11.09.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 20.10.2017. But since Presiding Officer was on tour on 20.10.17, the case was adjourned to 19.01.18, still no claim petition was filed in the case on 19.01.2018. Again on 22.01.19, the case was taken up for hearing but when none appeared from the side of the contesting parties it was ordered that registered notices be issued to the contesting parties for filing of their claim and counter claim petition in the case on behalf of the worker, but both the parties were absent and no claim petition was filed in the instant case by the Union raising the dispute on behalf of the worker. The case was again listed for hearing on 03.04.2018, 01.05.2018, 25.07.18, 28.09.2018, 20.11.2018, 18.01.19, but surprisingly enough to note that despite giving repeated and reasonable opportunities to the Union for filing claim petition on behalf of the worker, neither any one appeared on behalf of the union/worker nor any claim petition was filed in the case.

3. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is absolutely evident that neither the union raising the present dispute nor the workman is interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case2682 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] union/workers have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition, but after availing of the adequate opportunities, workers / union have deliberately and willingly failed in discharging their legal obligation in filing claim petition on their behalf before the Tribunal.

4. Hence, it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleadings have been filed by the contesting parties nor have any documentary evidence been filed on their behalf.

5. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /workers are not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.

6. Reference is answered as above.

dated 08.04.2019

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 658-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l xzkeh.k cSad izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013, 101/2103, 43/2103, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2103, 47/2013, 84/2103, 138/2103, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014, 100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2103, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2103, 111/2014, 89/2103/2019) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019

S.O. 658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013, 101/2013, 43/2013, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2013, 47/2013, 84/2013, 138/2013, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014, 100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2013, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2013, 111/2014, 89/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shryas Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-04-2019.

[No. L-12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 36, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 59, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013-IR(B-1)]

B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE SRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.

1. Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 2013

Between

Sri Jagdish Singh, S/o Sri Rajendra Pal Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2683 Head Office Digg iRoad, Aligarh 202001.

AWARD

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/13/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagdish Singh son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

2. Industrial Dispute No. 109 of 2013

Between

Sri Udaiveer Singh, S/o Sri Babu Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/27/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Udaiveer Singh son of Sri Babu Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

3. Industrial Dispute No. 79 of 2013

Between

Sri Darshan Singh, S/o Sri Chunni Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/38/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Darshan Singh son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"2684 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

4. Industrial Dispute No. 97 of 2013

Between

Sri Sandeep Kumar, S/o Sri Mohan Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/56/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank, now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Sandeep Kumar son of Sri Mohan Lal workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

5. Industrial Dispute No. 86 of 2013

Between

Sri Jagveer Singh, S/o Sri Pokhpal Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/39/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagveer Singh son of Sri Pokhpal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

6. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2013

Between

Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain, S/o Sri Puttu Lal Jain, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2685

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/36/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

7. Industrial Dispute No. 42 of 2013

Between

Sri Rakesh Kumar S/o Sri Roshan Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/15/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Rakesh Kumar son of Sri Roshan Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

8. Industrial Dispute No. 101 of 2013

Between

Sri Arvind Kumar, S/o Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 2260102686 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/60/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Arvind Kumar son of Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

9. Industrial Dispute No. 43 of 2013

Between

Sri Pushpendra Kumar s/o Sri Ramesh Chandra, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010 the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/28/2013-IR(B-1) dated 17.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

10. Industrial Dispute No. 90 of 2013

Between

Sri Pradeep Kumar Jain, s/o Sri Prem Chand Jain, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/57/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Pradep Kumar Jain son of Sri Prem Chand Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2010 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2687

11. Industrial Dispute No. 85 of 2013

Between

Sri Amar Babu, s/o Sri Chunni Lal C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/40/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Amar Babu son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

12 Industrial Dispute No. 87 of 2013

Between

Sri Roop Kishore, s/o Shri Krishan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/24/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Roop Kishore son of Shri Krishan workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

13. Industrial Dispute No. 84 of 2013

Between

Sri Satish Kumar, s/oVijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 2020012688 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/42/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Satish Kumar son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

14. Industrial Dispute No. 47 of 2013

Between

Sri Omveer Singh, s/o Late Mahendra Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/26/2013-IR(B-1) dated 20.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Omveer Singh son of late Mahendra Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?''

15. Industrial Dispute No. 138 of 2013

Between

Sri Ram Prakash, s/o Sri Ram Das, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/97/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2689

''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Ram Prakash son of Sri Ram Das workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

16. Industrial Dispute No. 139 of 2013

Between

Sri Raghvender Singh, s/o Sri Jai Pal Singh, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/95/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Raghvendra Singh son of Sri Jai Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

17. Industrial Dispute No. 81 of 2013

Between

Sri Manoj Kumar, s/o Sri Murari Lal, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/37/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Murari Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"2690 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

18. Industrial Dispute No. 96 of 2013

Between

Sri Moharman Singh, s/o Sri Netra Pal Singh C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/48/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Moharman Singh son of Sri Netrapal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

19. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2014

Between

Sri Kuldeep Singh, s/o Sri Umesh Singh C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/38/2014-IR(B-1) dated 03.07.2014.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

20. Industrial Dispute No. 100 of 2014

Between

Sri Tarsem Kumar, s/o Sri Balak Ram, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2691

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/54/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Rarsem son of Sri Balak Ram workman with effect from 01.01.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

21. Industrial Dispute No. 99 of 2013

Between

Sri Dinesh Kumar s/o Sri Pramod Kumar, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/59/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Dinesh Kumar son of Sri Pramod Kumar workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

22. Industrial Dispute No. 98 of 2013

Between

Sri Deepak Kumar, s/o Sri Brahman Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

2692 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/55/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

23. Industrial Dispute No. 88 of 2013

Between

Sri Manoj Kumar, s/o Sri Jaidev Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office, Diggi Road, Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/29/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Jaidev Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

24. Industrial Dispute No. 95 of 2013

Between

Sri Narendra Pal Singh, s/o Sri Vijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/58/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Narendra Pal Singh son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2693

25. Industrial Dispute No. 82 of 2013

Between

Sri Hariom Tatsath, S/o Sri Mahaver Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/41/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Hariom Tatsath son of Sri Mahaveer Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

26. Industrial Dispute No. 111 of 2014

Between

Sri Ram Naresh, S/o Sri Ram Charan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001

And

The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office, Diggi Road, Aligarh.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/25/2013-IR(B-1) dated 31.05.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Ram Naresh son of Sri Ram Charan workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?

27. Industrial Dispute No. 89 of 2013

Between

Sri Virendra Kumar Jain, S/o Sh. Raj Kumar Jain C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 2020012694 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

And

The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.

Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/23/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.

has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:

''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Virendra Kumar Jain son of Sri Raj Kumar Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"

28. As in all the above cases common question of facts and law is involved, therefore, all the cases were consolidated by order of the tribunal passed on 05.05.15 and Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 was made the leading case. Therefore the tribunal proposes to decide all the above cases by means of this common award.

29. The case number, name of worker, date of appointment, date of termination of service and the branch where they were posted are shown in the following chart which is as per facts mentioned by the concerned workmen in their claim petition:-

SL. No. ID No. Name of worker Date of appointment Date of termination Branch where was posted
1 41/2013 JAGDISH SINGH 01-06-2007 01-08-2012 SAKRAULI, DIST-ETAH
2 86/2013 JAGVEER SINGH OCT 1999 01-08-2012 ALIGANJ, DISTT- ETAH
3 97/2013 SANDEEP KUMAR 01/01/2099 01/01/2013 PATIALI GATE,DISTT-ETAH
4 79/2013 DARSHAN SINGH JUNE 2005 01-08-2012 JINHORA, UNDER ETAH GRAMNIN BANK
5 109/2013 UDAY VEER SINGH 1999 01-08-2012 ETAH CITY UNDER ETAH GRAMNIN BRANCH
6. 83/2013 PANKAJ KR. JAIN 1998 01-08-2012 ISSUALI UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
7. 42/2013 RAKESH KUMAR 2001 1-8-2012 PIWARI UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
8. 101/2013 ARVIND KUMAR 2001 01-01-2013 JAITHRA UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
9 43/2013 PUSHPENDRA KUMAR 2006 01-08-2012 PUNHERA , ETAH UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
10 99/2013 DINESH KUMAR 2006 01-01-2013 AMRAULI RATANPUR(ETAH) UNDER GRAMIN BANK OF ARYAVART
11. 83/2014 KULDEEP SINGH JANUARY 2008 01-07-2012 HATHODA (KASGANJ) UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
12. 89/2013 VIRENDRA KR. JAIN 26-03-2010 01-01-2013 JALESER CITIY UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
13. 111/2013 RAM NARESH 10-08-1999 01-07-2012 VIRAMPUR, UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
14. 82/2013 HARI OM TAD SAT 1995 01-08-2012 JALESHAR MAIN BRANCH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH
15. 95/2013 NARENDRA PAL SINGH 1990 01-07-2012 SARAWAL UNDER ATTAH GRAMIN BANK
16. 88/2013 MANOJ KUMAR 1997 01-08-2012 ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH
17. 98/2013 DEEPAK KUMAR 24-04-2K 1-01-2013 DARIYA GANJ, DIST- KASHGANJ UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
18. 100/2013 TARSEM KUMAR 01-01-1992 01-01-2013 RAJA KA RAM PUR (ETAH GRAMIN BANK)
19. 96/2013 MOHAR MAN SINGH NIL 01-08-2012 MALAWAN UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
20. 81/2013 MANOJ KUMAR 1997 01-08-2012 JALESHAR CITY UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
21 139/2013 RAGHVENDRA SINGH JANUARY 2010 01-01-2013 PATIALI BRANCH UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
22 138/2013 RAMPRAKASH APRIL 1986 1-1-2013 SIKAHRA UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
23. 47/2013 OM VEER SINGH 1-4-2001 1-8-2012 NIDHAULI KALAWN UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
24. 84/2013 SATISH KUMAR 1-1-1993 1-8-2012 AWAGARH, ETAH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
25. 87/2013 ROOP KISHORE JULY 2003 01-08-2012 NAGARIA BRANCH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
26. 85/2013 AMAR BABU JANUARY 2008 1-8-2012 JIRSAMI(ETAH) UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK
27. 90/2013 PRADEEP KR. JAIN 1992 1-1-2010 SAKRAULI (ETAH) UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2695

30. In the claim petition filed by each workman it is alleged that on 01.04.2014 Shreyas Gramin Bank and Aryavart Regional Gamin Bank were amalgamated with each other and Gramin Bank of Aryavart was constituted of which Head Office is situated at A-2/46, Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. It is also alleged that prior to 01.04.13, in the month of June 2006, Aligarh Gramin Bank, Etah Gramin Bank and Jamuna Gramin Bank were amalgamated with each other and in its place Shreyas Gramin Bank was constituted.

31. It is further alleged that the then branch managers of the branches mentioned above, to run effectively the working of the branch and with permission of senior officers of the bank had appointed the workers as temporary daily rated employee / messenger (coolie), but no appointment letters were issued to the concerned workmen by the management. The entire workers under the instructions of the branch managers had worked for whole month and their work and conduct ever remained satisfactory. It is further alleged by all the workmen that despite performing work for whole month, they had been paid wages only for 10 days and all the workmen were being assured by the then branch managers of the respective branches that in case they continue to work in the branch, their services will be regularized at the post of permanent messenger. Workers have further stated that believing the assurances given by the employer they continued to work in the respective branches of the bank. It is further pleaded that all the workers were also used to be paid bonus according to Rules. One fine morning suddenly by oral order of the then branch managers of respective branches, the services of all the workers were terminated (as per date mentioned in the chart as above) in gross violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by adopting Unfair Labor Practice as also ignoring their length of service. It is further pleaded by all the workers that from the facts and circumstances herein above it is established that they were removed from the services of the bank on an arbitrary and whimsical considerations without following the legal provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

32. Lastly it is prayed by each worker that they be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger with full back wages and further all of them be regularized in the service of bank.

33. It is pertinent to mention here that all the workers have also filed a copy of Public Notice dated 01.04.2013, issued by the Head office of Aryavart Gramin Bank, Luckow, which, inter-alia, provide amalgamation of Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) sponsored by Bank of India and Canara Bank into a single larger RRB in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It further provides that by Notification No. F.No.719/2011-RRB(UP-1) dated 01.04.2013, Government of India, in the exercise of powers under sub section (1) of section 23(A) of the Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 (21) in consultation with National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Bank of India and Canara Bank being the sponsor's bank of 1) Aryavart Kshertiya Garmin Bank and 2) Shreyas Gramin Bank, referred to as Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) has in public interest and in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Bank and also in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Rural Banks and also in the interest of the said Regional Rural Banks themselves notified amalgamation of the two Regional Rural Banks into a single Regional Rural Bank with effect from the date of publication of the said Notification in the official Gazette of Government of India.

34. It has further been stated by the Opposite Party that therefore, from the above notification which is a public document, it is established that the Shreyas Gramin Bank stands eliminated and after amalgamation, in its2696 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] place Gramin Bank of Aryavart has been legally placed and all the workers would be deemed to have been appointed by the Gramin Bank of Aryavat, Lucknow at their respective branches.

35. Management has filed a common reply in each case wherein it is admitted by the management that Shreyas Gramin Bank had been amalgamated with Gramin Bank of Aryavart by notification ref.No. F.No. 7/9/2011 RRB (U.P.1) dated 01.04.2013.

36. Management has further alleged that appointment and promotions in the respondent bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and prevailing rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the RRB Act, 1976 and known as (RRB Appointment and Promotion Rules, 1998).

37. It is further alleged that none of the applicants were ever appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedure laid down by the Government of India. All the workers were engaged as Coolie in the Branches of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on day to day basis in case of need of the branch. That none of the workers have worked for whole month and the coolie charges have been paid to the petitioners on day to day basis, who were engaged on emergent basis. Coolie Charges have been paid to the workers by charging the amount from Contingency Charges by the respective branch managers on the basis of actual number of working days. It is also denied by the bank that it had ever paid any salary or wages to the workers and that the "Coolie Charges" does not come within the definition of wages.

38. It is also denied by the management that there ever existed the relationship of master and servant between the Gramin Bank of Aryavat and the workman and that they had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank. It is also pleaded that none of the worker had ever marked his attendance in the attendance register. None of the worker had ever held any regular and permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to any of the workman involved in the present case. It is also denied by the management that any of the workman had worked for 240 days of continuous service during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of services. All the workmen were engaged on day to day basis and that such engagement came to an end at the end of the day. The management had never terminated the services of the workmen as mentioned in the present reference order, therefore, the present reference on this ground alone, is without jurisdiction, bad in law and not maintainable under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The service conditions of the bank employee do not apply to any of the workmen. Recruitment in the bank is done as per the set guidelines of the Government and accordingly candidates are sponsored by the Regional Employment Exchange, thereafter, they are subjected to written test and interview and only those candidates are appointed by offering them appointment letter in the service of the bank who have been declared successful. It is also pleaded that all the workmen are trying to enter into the service of the bank through back door entry by misusing and abusing the powers of this Tribunal. The persons engaged in emergent need on casual or daily rate basis are not covered by the "Bank Awards and Settlements". It is denied by the management that at any point of time it had contravened any of the provisions of the Act. The selection and appointment against regular and permanent post is the prerogative of the competent authority of the bank and a person who had never been recruited on regular basis had no right to assail the action of the appointing authority. The bank had never retrenched or terminated the services of the workmen at any point of time by oral or written orders, hence no industrial dispute exists between the contesting parties. It is also pleaded that none of the worker is covered by the definition of Workman as defined u/s 2(s) of the Act as also the management is not an Employer as defined under section 2(g) of the Act. That the workmen of the instant case prior to raising of the present dispute had also approached the Hon'ble High Court Allahabad with same prayer as has been prayed in their respective claim petitions but their writ petition was dismissed by order dated 01.03.2012, hence the decision of the Hon'ble Court is binding in the present case also.

39. On merit of the case It is admitted by the bank that the petitioners were engaged for the work of coolie in the branch of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent requirement and on day to day basis in case of any need at the branch. None of the worker was ever appointed as Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the branch. Since there was no regular vacancy in the branch, therefore, the question of appointment on the post of Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the bank does not arise at all. None of the worker had produced formal letter of their appointment in the bank and all of them are perhaps trying to seek back door entry in the service of the bank. It is also denied by the bank that at any point of time the bank had adopted any unfair labor practice with regard to the workmen.

40. The management on the basis of above pleadings has prayed that the present claim of the respective workers is devoid of merit and is therefore, liable to be rejected in lim-ne. It is also prayed that none of the workman is entitled for the relief claimed by them.

41. Rejoinder statements have also been filed by each of the workmen but therein nothing new has been pleaded except reiterating of the facts already pleaded in their respective claim petitions.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2697

42. It is relevant to mention here that by order dated 17.02.16, industrial dispute case nos 138, 139 of 13 and 83/14 were further consolidated with Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 which was made the leading case.

43. The management by application dated 02.11.2015 which is paper no. 14/1 has filed photocopy of order dated 20.09.2011 passed in Writ A No.-53798 of 2011 and order dated 01.03.2013 passed in Writ A No. 11728 of 2012 passed by Hon'ble High Court, Allahabad.

44. It is pertinent to mention here that by order dated 27.05.15, this tribunal partly allowed the application for summoning of documents from the management and the management was directed to produce Vouchers, Attendance Register, Salary Register, Dispatch Register (Tappal) as these documents are relevant for deciding the case.

45. In the instant case on behalf of the workmen S/Sri Udaiveer Singh in I.D. No.109 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.1, Virendra Kumar Jain in I. D. Case No. 89 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w. 2, Ram Naresh in I.D. No. 111 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.3, Pushpendra Kumar in I. D. No. 43 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.4 and Sri Hariom Tatsat in I.D. No. 82 of 2013 has examined himself as w.w.5, and all of them have filed their evidence on affidavit. They have also filed certain photocopies of the documents like payment vouchers and dispatch registers which have been duly verified by the bank.

46. In his affidavit evidence W.W.1 Sri Udaiveer Singh has stated nothing new except reiterating the statement made by him in his claim petition. He has filed photocopies of payment vouchers dated 01.08.11, 01.09.11, 01.10.11, 31.10.11, 01.12.11, 18.01.12, 02.02.12, 02.03.12, 31.03.12, 04.05.12, 02.06.12, 07.07.12 and 13.09.12 in support of his claim and all these payment vouchers are marked as paper no. 15/4 to15/17. All these documents are duly verified by the bank. Beside the witness has also filed photocopies of dispatch register paper no. 15/19 to 15/68.

47. This witness in his cross examination has categorically admitted that he was engaged by the branch manager on need basis as Coolie. He admitted that he was used to be paid his wages by the bank from contingency through voucher. Witness has further admitted the fact that he was never issued any appointment letter from the bank and he also expressed his ignorance as to whether or not such letter is available on the record of the case. He has submitted that his attendance was marked and the record showing that he had rendered 240 days of continuous service is available on the file. He further asserted that he was removed from the service in the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the exact date on which his services were dispensed with by the bank.

48. In his affidavit evidence workman W.W.2, Virendra Kumar Jain has deposed that on 26.03.2010, the then Shreyas Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart) had opened its new Branch at Firozabad and at that time no person was appointed on the post of Messenger on permanent basis. The then Branch Manager after approval of his senior officers had appointed him on the post of Messenger (Coolie). He performed the duties of messenger with full devotion. Worker has further given details of payment of monthly salary during the period March 2010 to June 2012, and last payment of salary was at Rs.4275/- in the month of June 2012. He has further deposed that the bank used to utilize his services outside the branch and that with effect from 30.06.2012 suddenly he was removed from the service of the bank in an arbitrary manner without making compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Act. He has further deposed that he is unemployed.

49. The witness W.W.2 in support of the above assertions has filed photocopy of payment vouchers duly verified by the Senior Manager, City Branch, Firozabad, Gramin Bank of Aryavart and these payment vouchers are dated 01.09.11, paper no. 14/6, 29.09.11, paper no. 14/7, 01.11.2011, paper no. 14/8, 01.12.11, paper no. 14/9, 31.12.11, paper no. 14/10, 01.02.12, paper no. 14/11, 29.02.12, paper no.14/12, 31.03.12, paper no, 14/13, 01.05.12, paper no. 14/14 and 01.06.2012, paper no. 14/15 and 30.06.12, paper no.14/16. Apart from above, the worker has also filed certain photocopies of letters of the branch manager addressed to Regional Office of the Bank at Agra purported to have been sent through the workman over which the branch manager had verified his signatures. These documents are paper no. 14/17 to 14/20. He has further filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by the bank which are paper no. 14/21 to 14/69.

50. In his cross examination the worker has admitted that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager on need basis. He was not paid his wages on daily wages rather wages were paid to him on monthly basis through vouchers. Sometimes bank used to pay him wages 1800/- per month and sometimes Rs.2600/-. He admitted the fact that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank and that he was not used to mark his attendance in the register in the branch. He further admitted that the signatures appearing on paper no. 14/6 to 14/16 which are payment vouchers are not his signatures. It is correct that there is no document on the record to show that he had rendered continuous service of 240 days but he was paid through vouchers and lastly he has submitted that the bank dispensed with his services on 12.06.2012.

51. Workman Ram Naresh in I.D. Case No. 111/2013 has examined himself as W.W.3 and has filed his evidence on affidavit in which he has deposed that on 10.8.99 he was engaged as Part Time Sweeper by the then Branch Manager, Etah Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart). He has further deposed that the bank had paid him wages and bonus as per rules. By an oral order he was transferred to Muhiuddin2698 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Branch of the Bank as the regular part time sweeper posted at that branch was transferred to Regional Office, Etah. Witness has further stated that he was working continuously from 12.08.11. Witness has further given details of payment of wages for the period September 2011 to June 2012. Apart from above statement, the witness has reiterated the allegations made by him in his petition.

52. W.W.3 in his cross examination has admitted the fact that the bank had engaged him on the post of Coolie on need basis. He was being paid his wages directly through the branch manager and that monthly wages were paid to him through voucher. He has further admitted that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank. The voucher that are filed along with his petition do not bear his signatures. Witness has stated that his attendance was marked in the branch but he has not filed any record showing that he had worked continuously for 240 days. Lastly the witness has stated that he was removed from the service of the bank in the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the actual date of his termination from the service.

53. This witness along with his affidavit evidence has also filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by the bank, but the witness has not whispered even a single word that the writing appearing on the register is of his own hand writing and that these documents also do not disclose the fact that actually it was in his name or documents bear the name of the witness. The documents filed by the witness are paper no.13/16 to 13/22.

54. Lastly worker Pushpendra Kumar has examined himself as W.W.5 and has filed his affidavit in his evidence. He has also filed photocopies of payment vouchers which are paper no. 12/5 to 12/13 and photocopies of dispatch register paper no. 12/14 to 12/31. All these documents have been duly verified by the bank.

55. W.W.5 in his evidence has reiterated the same facts which have been pleaded by him in his claim petition therefore, there is no need to detail those facts again.

56. In his cross examination the above witness has admitted that it is correct that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager. Witness has further admitted that his wages was directly transferred in his account by the bank and this fact has not been mentioned by him in his affidavit. He was not given any appointment letter by the bank. The vouchers that are filed along with his affidavit do not bear his signatures. His attendance was not recorded by the bank and he has not filed any record showing that he had worked for 240 days continuously in the preceding year. Witness has further deposed that he was removed from the service of the bank in the month of June 12 without making any payment. Witness again stated that he was paid bonus by the bank after June 2012 but exact amount of bonus is not known to him. Witness has lastly stated that no record has been filed by him relating to the bonus paid to him by the bank.

57. On the contrary, the bank has examined Shri Rakesh Kumar as M.W.1, who has filed his affidavit in evidence. This witness has stated that presently he is posted as Manager Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Branch Punhera, District Etah. M.W.1 in his evidence has further stated that Gramin Bank of Aryavart is a Regional Rural Bank established under the provision of Section 3 of Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976, and as per the provision of the Act, Regional Rural Bank shall in discharge of its function be guided by such direction in regard to matter of Policy as the Central Government may give or make in this behalf. This witness goes on to state that appointments and promotions in the bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and prevailing Rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 and now known as (RRB APPOINTMENT 7 PROMOTION RULES 1998). Witness further states that the applicant Jagdish Singh and other applicants were never appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedures laid down by Central Government under the said Appointment & Promotions Rules, 1998. Applicant Jagdish Singh and other applicants were engaged as Coolie in the branch of the Bank; Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on Day to Day basis. It is further stated by the witness that none of the workers involved in the case had ever worked as a Coolie for whole month in the branch and Coolie charge have been paid to the workers on Day-to Day basis who were engaged on the emergent requirement of the Branch. Coolie charges have been paid to the workers by drawing the amounts from Contingency Charges and that bank had never paid any wages to the concerned workmen. There exists no relationship of Master and Servant between the bank and the concerned workmen. Concerned workmen had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank and that none of the concerned workmen had ever marked their attendance in the bank and that none of the worker had ever held any Regular and Permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to the concerned workmen in any cadre whatsoever. It is also denied that any of the concerned workman had continuously worked for 240 days during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their alleged respective termination. Bank had never terminated the services of the concerned workmen. Service Conditions applicable on the regular and permanent employees of the bank are not applicable on the concerned workmen; hence they are not entitled to get any benefits or facilities like regular and permanent employees of the Bank. Name of none of the concerned workmen had ever been sponsored through the Employment Exchange or had any one of them ever been subjected to any written test or interview by the bank. Lastly it is stated by the witness in his affidavit that there is no regular and permanent vacancy in the bank against which[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2699 the concerned claimants are claiming their reinstatement or permanent regularization in the bank, therefore, none of the claimants have any lien or right on any regular and permanent post.

58. In his cross examination M.W.1 has stated that in the year 1983 he was appointed as an officer in the head office of Etah Gramin Bank, Etah. Witness has denied the suggestion as to whether it is correct that Officers and Employees are appointed under Appointment & Promotion Rules 1998. Witness has stated that Coolie is appointed as per need basis. After going through the document paper no.15/5, the witness has stated that it is a payment voucher with regard to whosoever is appointed as Coolie and bears the signature of the officer of the branch i.e. Branch Manager and payment has been mentioned for 26 days. Except holidays, the branch continues to work for whole month. Similarly the witness after going through paper no.15/17 has stated that the payment had been made to Coolie but it does not contain the name of the Coolie. Witness has further admitted that he had appointed a person by name Devendra Jain as Coolie and that he does not remember as to whether amongst 28 concerned workmen any of them had been appointed or not. Witness has expressed his complete ignorance about the 28 concerned workmen and whatever has been deposed by him in his affidavit is correct, but complete whereabouts about the 28 concerned workmen is not known to him. Witness has further shown his ignorance about the fact that Jagdish or other concerned workers have worked for 240 days or not. Whatever payment vouchers have been filed on the record of the court file is correct. The witness has denied the suggestion that concerned workers who are alleged to have been removed from the service of the bank on 30.06.12 have been given any notice or retrenchment compensation. It is not in his knowledge as to whether concerned workmen were given bonus or not in the year 2013. It is not in his knowledge that in the year 2013 workman Jagdish was paid bonus or not likewise he has no knowledge that in City Branch of Firozabad except Coolie there was any regular messenger.

59. I have heard the arguments of both the learned representatives for the parties at length and have given my anxious considerations to the documents and evidence led by the parties.

60. The learned representative for the workmen has mainly argued that the concerned workers were appointed as messenger in the bank by the respective Branch Managers as Messenger/Coolie after seeking the approval of the senior officers of the Bank for doing the regular and permanent work of the bank. The concerned workmen were used to be paid their wages month wise and all the concerned workers have continued to serve the bank on the assurances given by the officers of the bank that their services will be regularized as Messenger in the Branch, but suddenly under the oral order of the Branch Manager their services were dispensed with from the date mentioned in the reference order without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in utter violation of the principle of natural justice. It is also argued that the bank had neither given any notice nor retrenchment compensation to the concerned workmen at the time of dispensation of their services, therefore, they are entitled to be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger with full back wages and continuity of service.

61. On the contrary the representative for the management has advanced his arguments submitting that none of the concerned worker had ever been appointed by the bank in any capacity whatsoever; none of the concerned worker had ever been paid wages by the bank; no appointment letter has been issued to any of the worker; concerned workers have never been in the regular and permanent employment of the bank; there existed no relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers; none of the worker had ever completed 240 days of continuous service in the bank preceding 12 calendar year from the date of their respective termination of the service; the concerned workers have no lien or right against any regular and permanent post as none of them had ever been subjected to selection process prescribed under Rules of the Bank, hence in the eye of law the relief claimed by the concerned workers is not liable to be allowed and the entire claim of the concerned workers are liable to be rejected.

62. Considering the rival contention of the contesting parties it has become essential that the Tribunal should first examine the fact as to whether the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their alleged termination as mentioned in the respective reference order.

63. Weighing the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced by the concerned worker it is abundantly clear that the concerned workers with one voice have asserted in their oral evidence that they have completed 240 days of continuous service in a year and in support thereof have also filed photocopies of the payment vouchers which are duly verified by the bank. By a careful examination of these payment vouchers, it is quite evident that in the payment vouchers the name of the workers have not been mentioned and even each witness from the side of worker has admitted that these payment vouchers do not bear their signatures. Therefore, if it is so, how the statement of the witnesses appeared from the side of the concerned workmen could be believed. Even photocopies of dispatch register filed by the witnesses in support of their claim do not make it clear that by whom the entries therein have been made and thus these documents are of no help to the concerned workers and it is not established that the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service in 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of service.

2700 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

64. Management witness has categorically asserted in his evidence that no appointment letter was issued to the concerned workers, none of the concerned worker had ever worked continuously for 240 days, none of the worker had either been issued any appointment letter or had been paid regular wages from the bank. Therefore from the evidence of the management witness it stands proved that none of the concerned worker was ever remained in the employment of the bank or the bank had ever paid regular wages or salary to the concerned workers.

65. It is also proved from the oral as well as documentary evidence available on the record of the case that there never existed relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers and it is also established from the evidence of the parties that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their respective termination.

66. Needless to mention that it would be futile exercise to examine as to whether any notice or retrenchment compensation was paid to the concerned workers at the time of dispensation of their services as none of the concerned worker have specifically pleaded in their claim petition that they worked continuously for 240 days, neither it has been proved.

67. Having concluded that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days in the bank, they are not entitled for any relief as claimed by them in their respective claim petition.

68. Representative for the worker has placed reliance on the following Rulings:-

a) AIR 1982 SC 854 in the case of L.Robert D' souza vs Executive Engineer.

b) 1989 LAB IC 623 (PATNA HIGH COURT) IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.

c) AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2532 IN THE CASE OF DEVINDER SINGH VS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SANAUR.

69. The rulings relied by the representative for the worker are distinguishable on facts and law both and they are not helpful to the concerned workers particularly when it has been held that they have not been able to prove that they remained in continuous employment of the bank for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months.

70. The representative for the management has also relied upon the following case laws –

1. FLR 2007 (112) 345 in the case of State of M.P. and others vs Lalit Kumar Verma.

2. FLR 2007 (112) Indian Drugs & Pharma Ltd. Vs Workman IDPL S.C.

3. 2006 (110) FLR 803 Manager (Now Regional Director) RBI & Gopi Nath Sharma and others.

4. 2006 (109) FLR 237, Allahabad High Court in the case of Sarjan Kumar vs Central Bank of India and others.

71. The above case laws have been considered by me. and I am of the opinion that the preposition of law laid down in the above cited cases fully applies to the facts and circumstances of the case in hand and on the basis of the same it is once again held that none of the concerned worker are entitled for any relief. After having heard the arguments of both the parties at length, on scanning of the record and evidence available before the tribunal, it is inferred that none of the concerned workmen is entitled to any relief.

72. In view of above discussions, the award is adjudicated accordingly.

RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer

Date: 10.04.2019

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 659-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 6@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2701

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 6/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 27th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 6/2011

Between:

Sri Kola Rajesham, S/o Rajaposham, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad . ...Petitioner AND

1. The Chief General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam Area-I,

Karimnagar District.

3. The Superintendent of Mines, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., GDK No.2A incline, Ramagundam Area-I, Karimnagar District. …Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Kola Rajesham who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 18.2.1997and later he was converted as coal filler in the year 2005. But during the year 2006 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and faced other family problems like, suffering of his father with heart stroke and his elder brother met with an accident, as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 26.3.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2006 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 10.6.2008. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the2702 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents' management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 11 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 21.2.1997 as Badli Filler and later he was appointed as Coal Filler with effect from 1.8.2006. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. The domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 16.6.2017.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his illness, and heart stroke to his father and accident to his brother and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 41 years, he is now aged about 48 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2703 modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but has worked for about 11 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No. I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Kola Rajesham be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 27th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner: Witnesses examined for the Respondent:

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 660-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 7@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2704 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 7/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 7/2011

Between:

Sri Sk. Shareef Pasha, S/o Hussain Baba, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

…Petitioner

AND

1. The Director (P.A. & W), M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem. Khammam District.

2. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri. Adilabad District.

3. The Colliery Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kasipet Mine, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri. Adilabad District.

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri SK. Shareef Pasha who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 24.3.2007. But during the year 2008 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health as his left leg was burnt and faced other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties, as the injuries could not be cured for long time. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 10.1.2009 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2705 conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 26.5.2010 with effect from 16.6.2010. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary,violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 19.6.2007 as Badli Filler and continued to be in the same designation till the date of his dismissal without regularization. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 18.4.2017.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to illness, burning of his left leg, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it was not considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

2706 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged about 33 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man, has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but has worked for about 8 (eight) years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service, he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri SK. Shareef Pasha be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a badli filler, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2707 ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 661-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 34@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 34/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 19th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 34/2009

Between:

Sri S. Anjaiah, S/o Mallaiah, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad .

..….Petitione AND

1. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampally (P), Bellampally, Adilabad District.

2. The Colliery Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Goleti-2 Incline, Bellampally, Adilabad District.

…Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner   :      M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent   :      Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri S. Anjaiah who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No.P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2708 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in 1984 and later he was converted as General Mazdoor. But during the year 1997 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 28.4.1997 was served to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 4.4.1998 vide order dated 1.4.1998. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents' management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 14 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management.The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 17.6.1983 as Badli Filler and later he was regularized as General Mazdoor with effect from 1.8.1984. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the domestic enquiry held in this case as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 16.6.2010.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his illness and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2709

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 45 years, he is now aged about 55 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is a first offender and has worked for about 14 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

ORDER

Proceeding No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri S. Anjaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL2710 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 662-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 59@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 59/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 18th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 59/2009

Between:

Sri Anga Ramulu, S/o Ramulu, R/o H.No.14-5-482, Pittalanagar Post, Karimnagar.

…Petitioner

AND

1. The Chief General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam Area-I, Khammam District.

2. The Superintendent of Mines, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., JDK-2 Incline, Ramagundam Division-I, Khammam District.

… Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : Sri M. Venkata Swamy, Advocate

For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate

AWARD

Sri Anga Ramulu who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the dismissal order dated 4.9.2002 issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.

2. The Petitioner workman has filed his claim petition and Respondent also filed their respective counter statement.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2711

3. The domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid as it was not contested by the Petitioner. The case stands posted for arguments, but the Petitioner did not turn up though several opportunities were afforded to him.

4. Inspite of availing several opportunities to adduce evidence, the Petitioner workman remained absent and there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner has already been settled. In the circumstances stated above, it is felt that the Petitioner workman has got no claim to raise. Thus, 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 18th day of March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 663-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 31@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@04@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 31/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 19th day of March, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 31/2015

Between:

The General Secretary (Sh. Riaz Ahmed), Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS), Qr. No. C-34, Sector-1, Godavarikhani-505 209. Karimnagar District (Telengana State). …Petitioner Union AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani-505 209. Karimnagar District (Telengana State). …Respondent2712 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appearances:

For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates

For the Respondent : M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao, N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao & J. Narasimulu, Advocates

AWARD

This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi vide order No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 5.5.2015 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the dispute i.e.,

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services of Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex- Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2013 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?

After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No.31/2015 and issued notices to both the parties and secured their presence.

2. The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:

The workman Sri Pothula Narasaiah, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 9.11.1992 and later he was confirmed as Coal Filler on 27.12.1995. He wasregular to his duties and performing his duties upto the satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, during the year 2001 the younger brother of the Petitioner workman suffered with mental problems and there was no one to look after his ailing brother in his family. As he had to take his ailing brother to various hospitals for treatment of mental illness, he could not be regular to his duties during the year 2001. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 9.10.2002 was issued to him by the Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 2001, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation to the charge sheet. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service w.e.f. 11.12.2003. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2001, which was only on account of his younger brother's ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent's management in dismissing the Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has rendered 11 years of continuous service in the Respondent's management. The Workman approached the Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..

3. Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:

In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was appointed in the Respondent's company on 9.11.1992 as Badli Filler and subsequently appointed as coal filler on 1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry oficer; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Union/workman, conceding the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid vide order dated 7.1.2019.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2713

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?

7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Workman argued that due to his younger brother's ill-health as well as other family problems, the Workman could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Workman has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Workman. When the Workman has taken a stand that due to his younger brother's illness and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case sympathetically while imposing capital punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Workman, and has given capital punishment to the Workman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent argued that when the Workman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondent's company is legal and proper. When the Workman was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.

9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his younger brother's mental illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged about 46 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman, being an able bodied and energetic man and has already realised his mistake, and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has worked for about 11 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified.

Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondent's management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent's management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

RESULT:

In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2003 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.

2714 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and the reference is answered accordingly, so also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of March, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Workman Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Workman

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 664-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 39@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@24@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 39/2015

Between:

The President (Bandari Satyanarayana), Rashtriya Collieries Mazdoor Sangh(INTUC), Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road, Jaffar nagar, Mancherial – 504208. Adilabad District. …Petitioner Union[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2715

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292. Adilabad Distt. …Respondent

Appearances :

For the Petitioner        :       None
For the Respondent        :       Sri  Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area, Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Bandi Raja Komuru, Ex-Coal Filler, Goleti-2 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 23.5.2001 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 39/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner/Union. Non-appearance of the workman/Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the workman/Petitioner Union has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the workman/Petitioner Union is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 665-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ,l-bZ-lh-,y ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 80@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&22012@251@2000&vkbZvkj ¼lh-II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2716 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s SECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/80/2001

Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma, S/o Mangal Prasad Vishwakarma, C/o M.L.Vishwakarma, Asstt. Engineer (St.RE), MP Electricity Board, Sidhi (MP) …Workman

Versus

Sub Area Manager, Bungwar Sub Area of SECL, PO Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) …Management

AWARD

Passed on this 9th day of April 2019

1. As per letter dated 27-4-2001 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether the action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL, PO

Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) in dismissing of Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal

Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified? If

not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman alleged that he was first appointed as ITI Apprentice in Electrical Trade on 1-12-92 by Dy.Chief Personal Manager of the employers and after completing 1 year training on 1-2-94, he was appointed as General Mazdoor Category-I on 16-2-94 in pay scale of NCWA-IV by Chief Personal Manager SECL, Sohagpur. During the course of his employment, he suffered from Hepatitis and as there was no one to look after him at the project, he went to his brother's place at Sidhi where he was referred to Gandhi Clinic for treatment. He was under treatment of consulting Doctor at Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since November 94, was advised rest, hence unable to perform his duties for about 5 months. A showcause notice dated 16-4-96 was issued by employer management alleging that he remained absent since 22-11-94 which was a misconduct under order 26.24 & 26.23 of standing orders and was required to explain within 74 hours. He sent his reply with medical certificate vide registered letter dated 1-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95. It was further alleged that the workman further suffered from Hepatitis and depression as well psychophobia and was under continuous treatment of Doctor Praveen Kumar, Medical College Rewa till 27-1-97 and when after recovery reported himself for duty in the office of employers, he was not permitted to join his duty by the management. It is the case of the workman that he was never served any notice from the management regarding any enquiry. He submitted his representation to the management which was not considered. Thereafter he raised a dispute with the Asstt. Labor Commissioner. After failure of conciliation, the dispute was referred by the Central Government to this Tribunal. According to the workman, the charge against him was as follows:-

"On verification of record, it is found that you are absent from your work from 22-11-94 without any information. This action of yours constitutes misconduct under Section 26.24 and 26.30 of company stand order.

Section 26.24 Habit of absent without sufficient reason or habit of coming late.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2717

Section 26.30 To remain absent without sanctioned leave or sufficient reason from work or remain absent from more than sanctioned leave."

3. Workman further alleged that the domestic enquiry held by the Enquiry Officer regarding the charges was improper, invalid and illegal on following grounds, as mentioned in para 17 &18 0f statement of claim-

Para 17 - That the domestic enquiry held by enquiry officer of the above charges levelled against the workman/first party was improper, invalid and illegal interalia, on the following grounds:-

(a) That chargesheet was never served to the delinquent workman and thus very initiation of the disciplinary proceedings was bad in law.

(b) That the enquiry held by the management/ 2nd party was not just proper and lawful as the workman was not informed duly.

(c) That the principles of the natural justice were not followed by the management/2nd party as the workman/Ist party was not informed properly therefore, he could not defend his case properly.

(d) The illness of somebody is always beyond his controlled and he cannot be punished for that act which is not within his control and thus the act of the workman does not cover under the act or so called misconduct.

(e) That there is not a single evidence on record which could constitute the so called misconduct

(f) That so far as misconduct 26.30 was concerned there arose no occasion to get first leave sanctioned and only than fell sick, in case of sickness imposition of it as condition present before availing have neither could nor should be said just and proper nor it was intended by the certified standing orders. None of the conduct of the delinquent workman constitute or amount to misconduct under the certified standing order.

(g) That, the enquiry proceeding held behind the back of the workman/Ist party are unjust and illegal as the principal of natural justice are not followed in this regard.

Para-18: That the Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry

(a) Was not acting bonafide and was actuated with some extraneous or ulterior motives.

(b) That the finding of the enquiry officer is perverse, management failed to prove any misconduct of delinquent workman was charged with.

(c) That the management/second party failed completely to consider the contentions raised by the delinquent workman in his reply to the showcause notice.

(d) That the punishment imposed on delinquent workman is too severe to smeek of victimization. The service rendered by this workman were ignored and not taken in account by the management who awarded with such a harsh punishment to a poor workman.

4. Workman accordingly prayed for declaration of his termination illegal and his reinstatement in job with all the incidental benefits therewith annual and quarterly bonus with interest.

5. In the Written Statement of defense filed by the employer management, it was pleaded that habitual absence without leave or long absenteeism without prior permission has to be held misconduct under the certified standing order applicable to the workman. Workman absented himself without getting his leave sanctioned and without prior permission. Thereafter a charge sheet was issued against him regarding the charges of habitual absenteeism without sufficient reason and long absenteeism from duty without prior information and getting leave sanctioned. Vide order dated 1-7-95, the Enquiry Officer fixed 12-7-95 and notice was sent to the workman on his address furnished by him and recorded in Form B Register, maintained by office of the management but this notice was returned unserved with the endorsement that addressee was not available therefore another dated 28-7-95 was fixed by the Enquiry Officer and other registered notice was sent on the same address which was also returned unserved with the same endorsement. Thereafter another dated 18-8-95 was fixed as next date in the enquiry and 3rd notice was sent by registered post on the address which was also returned with the endorsement "addressee's whereabouts not known". In these circumstances, Enquiry Officer proceeded that the enquiry is ex parte and after recording evidence, submitted his report holding the workman guilty for the charges levelled against him. According to the proved charges, the attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 i.e. the period in which he was in employment. He absented himself details of which has been given by the management in para-15 of Written Statement.

2718 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

"That according to the records of colliery it was also proved that the workman was absenting unauthorizedly without giving intimation to the Manager of the mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his employment i.e. 16-2-1994 to 22-11-94 till he was absconded without sanctioned leave/ any intimation to the management is given here under:-

Month Attendance
February 1994 01 days
March 1994 17 days
April 1994 24 days
May 1994 18 days
June 1994 20 days
July 1994 16 days
August 1994 10 days
September 1994 11 days
October 1994 05days
November 1994 07 days

The Disciplinary Officer after agreeing with the findings of Enquiry Officer regarding proof of misconduct as mentioned above, the services of workman was terminated after approval of competent authority but before inflicting punishment, another show cause notice was also given to the workman on 10-10-95 and no reply was sent by workman. It was also pleaded that appeal was preferred to the Appellate Authority who did not find any merit in the case and dismissed the appeal vide order dated 11-12/3/98. Since the workman had absented himself without any information and without any sanctioned leave or any justification, the enquiry was held against him which was conducted after giving full opportunity to the workman but since he had absconded from the address furnished by him and was not traceable, the enquiry proceeded exparte against him. It was also pleaded that the workman never filed any papers regarding treatment or medical certificate nor did he availed a well equipped treatment facility which is free of cost, provided by the employers in the hospital maintained by the employers at his work place. Accordingly it was submitted that the reference be decided against the workman.

6. Workman did not file any rejoinder.

7. On the basis of pleadings, following preliminary issue/point for determination was framed by my learned predecessor vide order dated 15-6-2010-

8. "Whether the Departmental Enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?"

9. After recording evidence on this issue, it was held by my learned predecessor since public notice regarding enquiry was not issued, the domestic enquiry was not legal and proper against workman. This order is part of this award.

10. It transpires from the record that the management sought permission to prove charges before the Tribunal. Management filed documents charge sheet dated 6-4-94, office order dated 1-7-95, notice dated 1-7-95, registered post notice dated 20-21/7/95, registered post notice dated 29-7-95 ( 2 papers), registered post statement of witnesses recorded during enquiry, certificate regarding last date of presence issued and filed during enquiry, attendance particulars filed during enquiry, Enquiry Report, show cause notice dated 10-10-95 regarding the findings of enquiry before passing sentence, recommendation of Disciplinary Authority, order of termination dated 8-1-96 along with receipt of registered post by which the order was sent, 2 representations of workman dated 29-1-1967, reminder dated 1997, Order dated 18-3-98 rejecting the representation and prove it which are Exhibit M-1 to M-23 respectively. Management examined on oath its witness Rajmani Singh and Manish Bhandari who were cross examined by workman on the point of proof of charge. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examined.

11. I have heard argument of Shri Sanjay Verma, learned counsel for workman and Shri A.K.Shashi, learned counsel for employers/management and have perused the record. After perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following other points come up in this case for determination:-

(2) Whether charges of misconduct levelled against workman has been successfully proved

against the workman?

(3) Whether the punishment given is disproportionate to the charges levelled?

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2719

12. Point for Determination No.2-

According to Written Statement of defense filed by the management, the charge against workman is that he was habitual unauthorizedly absenting himself without prior information/ getting leave sanctioned within a period of his employment from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 and continuous unauthorized absence without prior information/ sanction of leave without any justifiable ground for a period 1-12-94 to 30-6-95 and thereafter.

13. According to management, this absence was unauthorized, without any prior intimation/sanction. In his written statement of claim, workman admits that he suffered from Hepatitis and went to his brother's place at Sidhi where he was treated in Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since 18-11-94 and was advised rest hence unable to perform the duties for 5 months. He was under continuous treatment under Dr.Praveen Kumar, Medical College, Rewa till 27-1-95 so the absence during the period in the charge atleast so far as it relates to continuous absence is admitted by the workman himself. This charge is further corroborated by the statement on oath recorded before the Court by statement of witness Rajmani Singh who was working as a clerk/ timekeeper with the management office. He has stated that workman was working as General Mazdoor Category -I. he absented himself since December 1994 till 30-6-94 continuously. Regarding 2nd charge of habitual absentee, this witness has stated on oath that the workman has been absented unauthorizedly without giving information to the Manager of the Mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 is as under:-

Month Attendance
February 1994 01 days
March 1994 17 days
April 1994 24 days
May 1994 18 days
June 1994 20 days
July 1994 16 days
August 1994 10 days
September 1994 11 days
October 1994 05days
November 1994 07 days

This witness further states that thereafter he absented himself unauthorizedly without any intimation till 30-6-1994. This witness further states that management has provided medical facilities for coal mine workers for which dispensary and central hospital are opened where free treatments are given by qualified Doctors in Sohagpur Area but workman did not avail free treatment and never complained of any disease. Workman never produced any medical certificate for sanction of leave, he absconded from work without any intimation. this witness further stated that workman never furnish any intimation regarding his whereabouts during the said period. The witness further stated that the attendance summary register which is Exhibit M-21 is in his signature prepared by him. In his cross examination, this witness has stated that period of absence mentioned in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief, has been stated on the basis of attendance summary register which is with management. he admits that the recording of attendance was not part of his job and he pleaded ignorance whether absence of workman was unauthorized or not.

14. Shri Manish Bhandari, Dy.Manager Personnel is another witness of management who has supported the case of Ist witness of management on the point of habitual absenteeism and unauthorized long absence of workman as mentioned in the statement of Ist management witness. Thus statement of this witness corroborates the statement of Ist witness on the point of absence. As has already been mentioned earlier, absence is not disputed by the workman rather he admits it with a case that he was under treatment during this period which he was receiving at his brother's place in Sidhi.

15. Para 106 Indian Evidence Act requires to be referred here which is as under:-

"Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge-When any fact is especially within the knowledge

of any. person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him."

This fact makes it clear that when a fact is in special knowledge of any person, burden of proving that fact is on that person hence the burden of proving the fact that he was ill and was under medical treatment during the period of his absence from duty lies on the workman. This burden can be discharged by filing documentary evidence for example Medical Certificate, certificate of fitness, documents regarding diagnosis2720 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] and treatment or by examining the Doctor under whose treatment the workman was during the period in question. Workman did not file any fitness certificate or medical certificate or any paper regarding diagnosis or treatment nor did he examined any Doctor under whose treatment he was during the period in question. The workman has examined himself on oath. He has stated in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief that he never absented himself during his service period whenever he remained on leave, he had filed his application for leave and during the period of his sickness also, he had filed his application for leave except this self serving statement, there is no document in support. He admits that the dispensary and hospital facilities are available to the workman and their families near the mines and in Sohagpur. He pleads ignorance about the free treatment given to workman in the management's hospital. When the management witness has stated that the workman did not file any certificate or papers regarding his illness and treatment, the burden of proving the fact that he had filed application with the management, is on the workman and he has failed to discharge this burden. Thus from the comparative analysis of evidence as respect to above produced by the parties, it comes out that firstly, the workman absented himself during the period as mentioned above and secondly,the reason for absence alleged by the workman is not established. Hence it is held that the absence of workman for the period as mentioned above is without sufficient cause, meaning thereby it is held proved that the workman absented himself during the period in question as referred above unauthorizedly, without informing the management and without any leave sanctioned. It will not be out of scope to refer the case of New India Assurance Company Ltd versus Vipin Beharilal Srivastava reported in (2008)3 Supreme Court Cases 446. The Apex Court has laid down that mere sending an application for grant of leave is not sufficient. In para-11 of the judgment, the court has observed as follows-

Para-11 The rules governing "leave" read as follows:

(1) General principles governing grant of leave. The following general principles shall govern the grant of leave to the employees;

(a) Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right.

(b) Leave shall be availed of only after sanction by the competent authority, but one days casual leave may be availed of without prior sanction in case of unforeseen emergency, provided the head of the office is promptly advised of the circumstances under which prior sanction could not be obtained.

(4) Sick leave-

(c) Sick leave can be granted to an employee only on production of a medical certificate from a registered medical practitioner, which term would include homeopathic, ayurvedic and Unani Doctor also provided they are registered medical practitioners.

(d) The certificate should state as clearly as possible the diagnosis and probable duration of treatment."

16. A reference of Rule 12.5 & Rule 13 of Certified Standing Orders applicable in the case of parties , referred to by learned counsel for management is also necessary which is as under:-

Rule 12.5: Application for leave or extension of leave on medical grounds shall be supported by a certificate from a Medical Officer of the company or where there is no such officer, a government Medical Officer or failing him, from a Registered Medical practitioner, stating the period for which leave is recommended. On receipt of such application, the sanctioning authority shall immediately inform the workman in writing whether the leave or extension of leave has been granted and if so for what period. An employee who has been sanctioned leave or an extension of leave on medical ground for a period exceeding 14 days at a time shall not be allowed to resume duty unless he produced a certificate o fitness. If no information is received by the workman, from the management, regarding leave in question as applied for, it may be presumed to be granted."

Rule-13: Application for leave:- A workman who desires to obtain leave of absence shall apply in writing to the Competent Authority, not less than 15 days before the commencement of the leave, except where leave is required in unforeseen circumstances and the competent authority shall issue orders on the application within a week of its submission of two days prior to the commencement of the leave applied for whichever is earlier, provided that if the leave applied for is to commence on the date of the application or within three days thereof orders shall be given on the same day. If the leave is refused or postponed, the fact of such refusal or postponement and the reasons therefor shall be recorded in writing in a register to be maintained for the purpose and if the workman so desires a copy of the entry in the register shall be supplied to him. If the workman after proceeding on leave, desires an extension thereof, he shall apply to the competent authority who shall send a written reply either granting or refusing extension of leave to the workman. Sanction/ refusal of leave shall be communicated to the workman in writing.

Similarly Rule 26.24 & 26.25 which deal with misconduct are also being reproduced as follows:-

Rule 26.24- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2721

Rule 26.25- Distributing or exhibiting in the company's work premises or estates, hand bills, pamphlets, posters or causing them to be displayed by means of signs or writing or other visible representations any matter prejudicial to the company without prior sanction of the management.

It is therefore, held in the light of evidence discussed above that the workman failed to comply the

provisions and his absence, held unauthorized and habitual, the charges against the workman are held

proved.

Point No for determination No.2 is answered accordingly.

17. Point for determination No.3- Rule 27.1 of certified standing order provides about penalties in case of misconduct. One of the penalty is removal/discharge from service and dismissal from service. Now question arises whether the punishment of removal of workman on the charges proved as mentioned is proportionate to the misconduct or not.

18. Learned counsel for management has referred to case Ever Ready Industries India Ltd, Jabalpur and others versus P.S.Parihar and another reported in 2003(3)MPHT-257 wherein it has been observed by the Hon'ble High Court that employer has justified in weeding out the worthless who have lost utility for the company. In the referred case, also the workman remained continuously sick for a long period and did not recover. His termination was confirmed by Hon'ble High Court. In case of New India Assurance Company Ltd.(Supra) also, the Apex Court refused to set-aside the dismissal of employee who remained continuously absent for long period without any justification. Keeping this preposition of law inn view, the dismissal of workman for the charges is held legal and justified. Workman is held not entitled to any relief. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.

19. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL in dismissing

Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor

Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified.

(2) The workman Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma is not entitled to any relief.

20. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.

Dated:9-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 666-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 40@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22012@25@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer2722 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 40/2015

Between:

Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah,

H.No.1-85,

Bellampalli (M)-504251.

Adilabad Distt. …Petitioner

AND

The General Manager,

M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,

Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.

Adilabad Distt. …Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner        :       None
For the Respondent        :       Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area, Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah, Ex-Badli Filler, Goleti-1 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 1.4.2005 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 40/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.

3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Non-appearance of the Petitioner and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the Petitioner has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the Petitioner is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit. Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2723

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 667-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&22012@51@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.

[No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 26th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 66/2013

Between:

The General Secretary (Sri Riaz Ahmed), M/s. Singareni Mines & Engg. Workers Union (HMS), Qr.No.C-34, Sector-I, Godavarikhani – 505 209, Karimnagar District. …Petitioner Union

AND

The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani – 505 209. Karimnagar Distt. …Respondent

Appearances:

For the Petitioner        :      M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent        :      M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 30.5.2013 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

''Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. In terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"

The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 66/2013 and notices were issued to the parties.

2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:

The Petitioner Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, was appointed as Staff Nurse on 4.8.1989 and was working for the M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. While so the concerned work woman has applied for 3 days leave from2724 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005 and also availed play day on 4.6.2005. But she could not report for the duty on 5.6.2005 as her father was in serious condition and her presence was very much essential and she continued to assist him regularly. In the mean while, the concerned workwoman also fell sick and her daughter Kum. Alekhya Jayanthi also fell sick. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.12.2005 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner could not submit her explanation to the charge sheet and that she could not participate in the enquiry also. As a result of which an exparte enquiry was conducted. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the workwoman was dismissed from service vide order dated 31.8.2006 with effect from 7.9.2006. But without considering any of her submissions, the workwoman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner workwoman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner workwoman has rendered about 17 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner workwoman approached the Respondents to consider her case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner workwoman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by the 1st respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner workwoman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..

3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief

which runs as follows:

In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner workwoman was appointed in the Respondents' company on 6.8.1989 as Junior Staff Nurse and was promoted to 'C' and 'B' grades on 8.9.1980 and 4.9.2000 respectively and has been working in Sector-III dispensary of the Respondents' company. It is submitted that the Petitioner workwoman was sanctioned 6 days leave for the period from 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005. She was to report for duty on 5.6.2005, but she did not resume her duty on 5.6.2005, and has been continuously absenting from duty. She was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner did not attend on the dates fixed for the enquiry and finally as a last chance the enquiry notice was published in the Telugu Daily Newspaper on 5.5.2006 fixing the date of enquiry, but she did not attend the enquiry on the date fixed. She was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend herself. As such, an exparte enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner workwoman by way of show cause notice giving her an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner workwoman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and her past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner workwoman from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner workwoman was irregular to her duties and she did not improve her attendance even after issuing charge sheet to her, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner workwoman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.

4. In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner not to contest the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 14.9.2017.

5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.

6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:

I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is legal and justified?

II. Whether the Petitioner workwoman is entitled for reinstatement into service?

III. If not, to what other relief she is entitled?

7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner workwoman submitted that due to her illness, illness of her father and also her daughter, the Petitioner workwoman could not be able to attend her duty sincerely. Even in her representation the Petitioner workwoman has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner workwoman. When the Petitioner workwoman has taken a stand that due to her illness, and other family problems she could not be able to attend her duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered her case while imposing punishment. The[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2725 authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner workwoman, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner workwoman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.

8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner workwoman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against her, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner workwoman was not sincere in her duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year she is not entitled to be reinstated in service.

9. In fact, due to illness the Petitioner has remained absent in her duties and a proceeding was initiated against her for her absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the Petitioner workwoman did not participate and the charges levelled against the workwoman were proved. For this, capital punishment has been imposed. After dismissal of service, the workwoman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to her family members. She has already realised her mistake and has taken shelter in the Tribunal and is ready to provide bread and butter to her family members. When she has already realised her mistake atleast one chance should be given to her for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. The Petitioner workwoman is a first offender and has worked more than 17 years under the Respondents. When punishment has been imposed, her past conduct has not been considered. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workwoman as well as her family members, so also her past conduct. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified.

This point is answered accordingly.

10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner workwoman has already realised her mistake and has come to the Tribunal with a prayer for her reinstatement into service she should be given a chance to serve for her family members. Now, after dismissal of service the workwoman has become jobless and she being the sole earning member of her family, is unable to provide a square meal to her family members. In such a circumstances, atleast the Petitioner workwoman should be given a chance to maintain her livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But, in the circumstances stated above, the workwoman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in her petition. But the Petitioner workwoman is entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.

Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.

Result:

The action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. in terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is not justified. Proceeding No. CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workwoman Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Staff Nurse on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workwoman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workwoman at the time of her posting.

The workwoman can not claim for her posting in the same place, where she was last employed. The workman shall have to either maintain minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and she will be cautioned to improve her performance by issuing her a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, she will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer2726 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the

Petitioner Respondent

NIL NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 668-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,u-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 9@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&22015@12@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]

jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of NCL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23-04-2019.

[No. L-22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II)]

RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/9/2014

General Secretary, Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Shramik Sandh (BMS), Amlohri Project Branch, PO Amlohri, Distt. Sidhi (MP) …Workman

Vs.

Chief General Manager, Amlohri Project, NCL, PO Amlohri, Distt. Sidhi (MP) …Management

AWARD

Passed on this 5th day of April, 2019

1. As per letter dated 28-1-2014 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II).The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether the fixation of Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra by the Chief General Manager, Amlohri

Project, NCL PO Amlohri, Distt. Singrauli on his (Shri Mishra's) requested reversion due to ill-health

to the post of Driver Category-V from Dumper Operator Category Grade II was not in order as his

promotion/ upgradation were not taken into consideration. If so, what benefit Shri Madhusudan

Prasad Mishra be entitled to i.e. arrears of difference of pay and promotion?

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2727

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he submitted that he was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V on 15-5-84, promoted as dumper operator Grade II on 20-2-87 and later on he got salary to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I because he operated higher capacity machine.

3. Vide order dated 11-4-94 issued by Dy.Chief Personal Manager, Amlohri Project, he was reverted due to illness i.e. asthma which was born due to sand and dust. On 11-4-94, he was getting salary @Rs.71.43 as basic pay and after his reversion as Driver Category V, his basic pay was reduced and was fixed @ Rs.44.50. vide order dated 7-6-1999, his salary was protected on the basis of recommendation and past services and he was fixed at basic pay of Rs.104.90 per day which is related to the salary of Dumper Operator Grade II. It was also alleged that at per cadre scheme of N.C.L. the post of driver operator and car operator are of two different cadres and further that vide order dated 6/7-11-2003, workman was selected as crane operator Grade-III, and at present working as crane operator Grade I. It is the claim of workman that at the time of reversion i.e. on 11-4-94, wages of workman were fixed in the pay scale provided in NCWA-IV(National Coal Wage Agreement) and at the time of protection of pay provided in NCWA-V, hence the workman is entitled to get the difference of wages and pay for the period from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly, workman has claimed the difference of wages from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99 as per NCWA-IV & V which is about 6 lakhs.

4. In their written statement of defense, the employers admitted that the workman was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V as alleged by him and was working as dumper operator Grade I in the pay scale of 31.99-1.76- 56.63(MCWA-III) and his basic salary was fixed Rs.33.75 per day. On 29-3-94, he submitted an application before Chief General Manager stating that he was suffering from asthma and has been medically advised to avoid dust hence unable to perform the duties of dumper operator. He expressed his desire to go back on the job of Driver Cat-V for which he expressed his readiness and willingness to accept wages of Driver Category V. The management after considering his request, re-designated him as Driver Category V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic was fixed initially in the pay scale of 44.50-1.62-67.18 (NCWA-IV). His basic was fixed after re- designation in post of Driver Category V as under:-

a. Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra was appointed as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 15-6-84,

b. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Gr-II w.e.f. 20-2-87

c. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I w.e.f. 28-2-89

d. Basic pay drawn in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I

In NCWA IV In NCWA V

1-3-92 Rs.66.19 1.3.92 Rs.98.95

1-3-93 Rs.68.81 1-3-93 Rs.103.50

1-3-94 Rs.71.43 1.3.94 Rs.108.05

A representation dated 26-8-97 by the Union in this respect on the ground that before re-designation as Driver Cat-V. workman was getting basic pay of Rs.108.05 per day in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I. This remuneration was deducted and Union was informed by the management vide letter dated 8-12-96. Workman further file a case before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate Singrauli but could not succeed. It was decided that since workman was selected for the post of dumper operator to Driver and was again re- designated as Driver hence his pay might be fixed for the post of Driver Cat-V as if he was not selected for the post of Dumper Operator and he would get increment benefit of Driver Cat-V meaning thereby he was appointed on 15-6-84 and his pay be fixed with awarding normal increment of Driver Cat V from 1-7-85 but actual monetary benefit may be given with immediate effect and no arrear will be paid consequent upon the new fitment. Also, it was decided that consequent upon placement in Cat-V, workman will not claim promotion to the post of Driver Cat-VI cum Mechanic in case his juniors were promoted. This decision was taken after prolonged discussion with the workman. Accordingly, the management prayed for rejection of his claim.

5. In his rejoinder, the workman states that copy of application of workman dated 21-3-94 Annexure M-1 filed by the employers shows that the workman only requested for change of place of duty and the employers did not pass any order on his application on Annexure M-1. Workman filed another application dated 29-3-94, copy filed by the management which he had filed at the instance & assurance of employers that his pay will be protected and it is on that application filed by the workman on assurance by the management that his pay would be protected, the employers passed order dated 11-4-94, copy filed by employers with their Written Statement of defense. Workman reiterated allegations that employers passed order dated 7-6-99 protecting his salary w.e.f. 11-4-94 but stated in the order that workman would not get the monetary benefits and no arrear arise out of fixation. This order dated 7-6-99 is illegal and discriminatory because similarly placed workman George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh, G.S.Pandey, working in other projects of the same employers have been granted pay protection.

2728 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

6. Workman has examined himself on oath and has filed 3 photocopy documents which are office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 relating to Kakri project. These orders relate to other workman R.D. Patel, B.P.Dwivedi and George Koshi as stated by him in his rejoinder.

7. Management examined Sunil Kumar Jha, General Manager of the Amlohri Project on oath and proved documents- application dated 21-3-94 & 29-3-94, office order dated 11-4-94, letter dated 8-12-97 of management sent to Union which are Exhibit M- 1 to M-4 respectively.

8. Shri S.K. Mishra appeared on behalf of workman and Shri A.K.Shashi for employer. I have heard argument of learned counsel from both the sides and have gone through the record.

9. On perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points came up for determination in the present case:-

(1) Whether the refusal of arrears regarding difference of pay/ wages during the period 11-4-94 to

7-6-99 by the management is justified in law and fact?

(2) Whether the workman is entitled to any arrear of difference of pay?

10. Point for Determination No.1-

Admitted between the parties is the fact that while workman was working as Dumper Operator Grade I, he was reverted to Driver Cat-V on his application. Date of order of reversion is 11-4-94. According to the workman, he filed an application on 21-3-94 requesting him to allot duty at another place because working as dumper operator in sand and fumes is adversely affecting his health. This application has been proved by management's witness at Exhibit M-1. Perusal of this application reveals that following order was passed on the application by management-

"Dy.CPM- please issue a letter to Shri M.P.Mishra (worker) that as dumper operator, he cannot get a place out of mine area. If he will give option for demotion to the post of Driver Cat V, he can be posted in dispensary or else where out of the mine."

This document has been admitted by the workman also. The other application filed by workman on 29-3-94, copy filed by management, admitted by workman, proved by management witness at Exhibit M-2 makes it clear that in its 2nd application, workman expressed his willingness to change his post from dumper operator to Driver and also expressed his consent and accepted hat he will accept whatever salary admissible to him as per rules on his changed place. There is an order of the management side which reads as under:-

" He should be engaged as Driver Cat-V and should also be paid wages of Driver Cat-V. he would be posted in hospital – signed on 29th March"

Exhibit M-3 proved by management's witness, admitted by the workman is the formal office order dated 11-4-94 passed by Dy.Chief Personal Officer on his application dated 29-3-94. This order reads as under:-

"Shri Madhusudhan Prasad Mishra Dumper Operator vide his application dated 29-3-94 has requested for Driver job as he is suffering from asthma disease and unable to perform duty of Dumper Operator. His request has been considered and he is hereby re-designated as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic will be fixed Rs.44.50-1.63-67.18. Shri Mishra is directed to report for duty to Medical Superintendent Amlohri."

11. Workman has stated on oath that the application dated 29-3-94 was filed by him under the assurance by the management that he will be adjusted out of field duty as a Driver on the same pay and wages he was getting as Dumper Operator Grade I. Management side has denied this allegation in their written statement of defense. Hence, the burden of proving the fact that workman filed application dated 29-3-94 on the assurance given by management regarding protection of his salary and wages will be on the workman. There is nothing on record except the self serving statement of workman on this point. the office order referred to above passed on the application of workman and the endorsement of the Manager on the application of workman M-3 & M-2 respectively, do not state that his pay shall be protected after changing his job from Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V. Moreover in Para-5 of the Written Statement of the claim, workman has stated that vide order of management dated 7-6-99, his salary was protected on the basis of representation and past services and he was fixed at Rs.104.90 per day. This pay is relating to post of dumper operator Grade II. Hence, this allegation of workman where he admits that his salary was protected by order of management dated 7-6-99 shows that his grievances were redressed. As regards, payment of arrears of salary for the period between 11-4-94 to 7-6-99, there is no such order regarding payment. The point arises here is whether management was under obligation to pay arrears or not. No rule or cercular has been cited by workman which provides the management to pay arrears of pay and wages in such a situation. It is further the case of workman in his rejoinder that similarly placed other workers viz George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2729 and Shri G.S.Pandey were granted arrears when their cadre was changed. The management has first denied it.

12. Learned counsel for management has submitted that these workmen are not the employees of Amlohri Project rather they are employees of Kakri and other projects under different managements hence any order of the management of other project will not be binding on present employers. Learned counsel for workman has rebutted this argument with submission that all projects are owned and managed by NCL hence simply because the projects are different, no discrimination can be done in similar circumstances as it has been done in the case in hand which requires to be rectified.

13. Point further arises that whether workman has successfully proved this fact in the case in hand or not. Perusal of record reveals that application was filed by workman directing the management to produce the service records of R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi. The management opposed this application stating that their service records are not with them because these workers are employees of different projects and their service records are maintained in the office of that project. This application for summoning document was dismissed by my learned predecessor that the management in the case in hand cannot be directed to produce these service records because the records were not in their possession and control. Workman could file an application for summoning the records from the offices where they were maintained but he did not do so hence a simple self serving statement of workman that in similar cases of cadre change, arrears of difference in salary were given to Shri B.K.Singh, George Koshi and R.D.Patel, which is not supported by any document is not sufficient to prove this assertion of workman. Moreover, there is on record photocopy of office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 which is inadmissible because it has not been proved. These 3 documents are office orders subsequent upon change of cadre of employees R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi Even in these inadmissible documents,there is no order regarding payment of arrears of difference of wages rather it has been specifically denied to them. Hence, in such a circumstance, and in the light of facts and evidence as mentioned above, there is nothing on record to hold that management was not justified in refusing arrears of difference of pay to the workman for the period 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly it is held that refusal of management to pay arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his change of cadre from post of dumper operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is not unjustified in law or fact. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

14. Point for Determination No.2-

In the light of my finding in Point No.1, this point is answered in negative holding that the workman is not entitled to any relief.

15. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management in not paying arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his

change of cadre from post of Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is proper and legal.

(2) Workman Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra is not entitled to any relief.

16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.

Dated: 5-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 669-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ lSUVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 92@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@62@2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2730 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.04.2019.

[No. L-12012/62/2013-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,

JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2013

Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas, Ward No.4, Maa Baba Chowk, Bahmni Banjer, Mandla (MP) …Workman

Versus

Sr. Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, 601, Napier Town, Jabalpur (MP) …Management

AWARD

Passed on this 3rd day of April, 2019

1. As per letter dated 30-9-2013 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/62/2013-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether the action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of

Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas is legal and justified? What relief the claimant is entitled for and from which

date?"

2. In his statement of claim, the applicant workman has stated that he was appointed/ entered in the service of the employer Bank in Bahmni Banjer Branch on 6-4-2002 as peon cum safai worker and worked till 12-2- 2013 without any break in service. At the time of his termination, he was paid fixed wages @ Rs.1850 per month. He discharged his duties faithfully and diligently like any permanent employee, worked even on holidays and had completed more than 240 days in each calendar year for about 11 years continuously. He was initially paid Rs.740 per month which was raised up to Rs.1850 per month during the course of his employment. The post on which the workman was working was regular in nature. Vacancies for the post were advertised. Workman also submitted his application, to be forwarded to Regional Office of the employer Bank but it was not sent in time due to malafide on the part of employers depriving him an opportunity to appear in the selection process for the vacancies. He agitated against this and the Branch Manager of the employer Bank terminated his services verbally from 12-2-2013. He had worked 240 days in the year preceding the date of his termination. No notice or salary was given to him hence the termination is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act, is also violative of principles of natural justice hence amounting to illegal retrenchment, victimization and unfair labor practice. It was also alleged that after his termination, workman has been out of gainful employment and has been unable to get job anywhere. His family is living in starvation because he is the only earning member of the family. Accordingly, the workman has prayed for declaring illegal and setting aside his termination and direction to employers to reinstate him with full backwages.

3. In their Written Statement of defense, employers have flatly denied the allegation that the workman was ever employed by them in any capacity. It was also pleaded that he was neither engaged as a daily wager or part time worker of the Bank. He was not an employee of the Bank. Bank never directed him to work in any Branch of the Bank. There is no relationship of workman and employer between the parties hence there is no question of his completing 240 days in employment/ engagement of the employer Bank preceding the date of his termination. Also, it was pleaded that the Bank issued publication on 2-11-2012 in newspaper regarding vacancies of Safaikarmchari and peon but the application of the workman could not reach to its Regional Office in time hence he was not considered. There has been no violation of Section 25-F or any provision of ID Act. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed as such.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2731

4. In evidence, workman filed peon book (7 pages), payment vouchers (4 pages), written application to Regional office of the Bank regarding his application w.r.t. vacancies ( 1 page), certificate issued by Branch Manager alongwith the application (1 page each). Letter of Branch Manager dated 28-11-2011(2 pages), all admitted by employers marked Exhibit W-1 to W-6 respectively. Workman also filed copy of communication dated 23-2-2013 issued by Bank to him stating the reasons of non-consideration of his application. In the recruitment process with regard to vacancies advertised which is also admitted by employers is Exhibit W-7. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examination by employers.

5. The management examined its witness Shri Sumil Goel, Branch Manager on oath, who was cross-examined by workman. The management also filed payment vouchers, 8 in number, attendance sheet (14 pages), peon book ( 64 pages). All admitted by workman except attendance sheet marked Exhibit M-1 & M-2 respectively.

6. I have heard argument of Shri Arun Patel, learned counsel for workman and Shri Avinash Dey, Learned counsel for management and have also gone through the record.

7. From the perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points for determination arise in the case in hand-

(1) Whether the termination/dis-engagement of services of workman is justified in law?

(2) If the answer of Ist point is in Negative, whether the workman is entitled to any relief?

8. Point for Determination No.1-

Respective pleadings of the parties on this point have already been detailed earlier. Workman has examined himself on oath. In his affidavit, he has stated that he was engaged as pen from safai worker on 6-4-2002 & since then, has been continuously working upto 12-2-13 at Bahmni Banjer Branch of the employer Bank. He was paid wages regularly through payment vouchers, some of the vouchers have been filed by him. He further stated that he was assigned work daily including Dak distribution to the Bank's customers. Copy of the peon book has been filed by him. He also states that his services were terminated without giving notice or without assigning any reason from 13-2-2013 by a verbal order which is against law and since then he is not gainfully employed any where. He has denied that he was called for work only when the Bank required his services and has stated in his cross-examination that he was regularly kept in engagement and had worked for 240 days in the year preceding his dis-engagement. Workman has filed and proved peon book (copy) which is in 7 pages, admitted by employer. It goes to show that he has distributed various mails to various people/ persons within a period from 5-3-2002 to 16-3-2007 on different dates. Payment vouchers (copy) total 4 pages, filed by workman admitted by the employers which is Exhibit W-2 goes to show that he has been paid wages during the period of 7-1-2003 to 1-8-2007 at different dates as casual worker with the Bank. Workman has further filed and proved an application and certificate dated 7-11-2012, issue by the Bank certifying that he worked for more than 45 days in the year 2002-03. Employers have admitted these two documents. This certificate was issued by employers in relation to an application (copy on record), about which the workman has stated that he had submitted application regarding recruitment w.r.t. vacancies advertised,which was not forwarded by the Branch to the Regional office. Management's witness Sumit Goel, Branch Manager has stated on oath that workman was never an employee of the Bank nor was he appointed by any officer of the Bank. His averment that he was peon cum safai worker at Bahmni Banjer Branch from 6-4-2002 to 12-2-2013 is baseless because he was not appointed in the Bank nor was engaged as daily wager or part time worker with the Branch. It was also stated that since he was not in engagement of the management Bank therefore he was not directed at any point of time to discharge any duty and there was no question of completing 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged dis-engagement hence benefit of Section 25-F is not available to him regarding not forwarding his application for recruitment regarding vacancies in the year 2012, the witness states that his candidature was not considered because his application was not received by the Regional office of the Bank before the last date fixed for filing applications. Also, it was stated by the witness that since there was no relation of employer and employee, at any point of time between parties, the provisions of I.D. Act, 1947 are not applicable in the case at hand.

9. In his cross-examination, management witness has stated that the documents (referred to above) filed by the workman have been admitted by management employers. This witness also admits that no notice or compensation was given to him before his disengagement. It is strange that the document filed by management itself rebut the oral statement of management's witness Exhibit M-1 which is of 8 pages is the payment voucher regarding payment made to the workman by the Bank. These vouchers are of date 3-1- 2012, 2-3-12, 18-4-12, 1-5-12, 2-6-12, 3-7-12, 4-9-12, 6-10-12. It is specifically mentioned in these vouchers that these are wages of daily wager workman Vinod Kumar Srivas. Learned counsel for employment submits that even if it be taken that the workman was paid through these vouchers because he worked with the2732 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Branch or was engaged with the Branch, these vouchers donot prove him in engagement for 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged disengagement. Payment voucher of March 12 establishes that workman had worked in February 2012 for which payment was made in March and same is the case with other vouchers. Hence, these 7 payment vouchers establish the case of the workman that he was engaged for 7 months i.e. for 210 days with the Bank. Regarding his engagement for other period, management has itself filed peon book which is 64 pages marked Exhibit M-2. The peon book(copy) Exhibit M-2- page 27,28 & 29 as well as 30 show that the workman has distributed different mails in the month of May. Similarly peon book Exhibit M-2 Page 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 & 41 also establish that he has distributed various mails on different dates to different persons on behalf of Bank.

10. Learned counsel for management has tried to discredit these documents, though filed by the management itself, with a ground that these documents donot contain full signature of the workman in the column of the person who has delivered the mail but I am not inclined to accept these argument because in every document right from statement of claim to statement of oath on other documents, the initials of the workman are same hence these M-2 document further establish that workman has also worked in the month of May and July for which, particularly for the month of July, the payment vouchers has been with held by the management. accordingly the evidence produced by the workman regarding his claim that he completed 240 days preceding date of his termination appears more reliable than the barred statement of management's witness, contradicted by the documents produced by the management itself, that workman was never in engagement at any time with the Bank. On the basis of above discussion, the fact that workman had completed 240 days in the year preceding his date of disengagement is held proved. Also the fact that workman has been engagement of the management Bank since April 2002 as casual worker on whole time basis, discharging the duties of mail messenger and other duties till date of his disengagement is also held proved.

11. Reference of Section 25-F of ID Act is also necessary which reads as under:-

Section 25-F: Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until-

(a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice: 1[***]

(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of six months; and

(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government 3[or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette."

12. Learned counsel for workman referred to case of Director, Fisheries Terminal Division versus Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Chavda reported in AIR-2010 SSC-1236. Para-14 & 15 of this judgment requires to be mentioned here which are being reproduced as under:-

This court in the case of R.M. Yellatty vs. Assistant Executive Engineer [(2006) 1 SCC 106], has observed

"However, applying general principles and on reading the aforesaid judgments, we find that this Court, has repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked for 240 days in a given year. This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping up in the witness box. This burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent 9 evidence, both oral and documentary. In cases of termination of services of daily-waged earners, there will be no letter of appointment of termination. There will also be no receipt of proof of payment. Thus in most cases, the workman (the claimant) can only call upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter of appointment of termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register, etc. Drawing of adverse inference ultimately would depend thereafter on the facts of each case."

15) Applying the principles laid down in the above case by this court, the evidence produced by the appellants has not been consistent. The appellants claim that the respondent did not work for 240 days. The respondent was a workman hired on a daily wage basis. So, it is obvious, as this court pointed out in the above case that he would have difficulty in having access to all the official documents, muster rolls etc. in connection with his service. He has come forward and deposed, so in our opinion the burden of proof shifts to the employer/appellants to prove that he did not complete 240 days of service in the requisite period to constitute continuous service. It is the contention of the appellant that the services of the respondent were terminated in 1988. The witness produced by the appellant stated that the respondent stopped coming to work[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2733 from 10 February, 1988. The documentary evidence produced by the appellant is contradictory to this fact as it shows that the respondent was working during February, 1989 also. It has also been observed by the High Court that the muster roll for 1986-87 was not completely produced. The appellants have inexplicably failed to produce the complete records and muster rolls from 1985 to 1991, inspite of the direction issued by the labor court to produce the same. In fact, there has been practically no challenge to the deposition of the respondent during cross-examination. In this regard, it would be pertinent to mention the observation of three judge bench of this court in the case of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas [(2004) 8 SCC 195], where it is observed: "A Court of Law even in a case where provisions of the Indian Evidence Act apply, may presume or may not presume that if a party despite possession of the best evidence had not produced the same, it would have gone against this contentions. The matter, however, would be different where despite direction by a court the evidence is withheld.

On the basis of above discussion, it is held that dis-engagement of services of workman Vinod Kumar

Srivas from 12-2-2013 is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act and is untenable in law. Point No.1 is

answered accordingly.

13. Point for determination No.2-

In the light of finding w.r.t. Point No.1, point remains for determination is to what relief, the workman is entitled? Learned counsel for workman has relied on case law Tapas Kumar Paul versus BSNL and another reported in 2014(4)-SCR-875 and has submitted that since the retrenchment of the workman has not been found legal, hence he requires to be reinstated as prayed by him in the facts and circumstances of the case at hand. The Apex Court has laid down certain guidelines to be considered in substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding compensation. These are -

"It is no doubt true that a Court may pass an order substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding compensation but the same has to be based on justifiable grounds viz.

(I) where the industry is closed;

(II) where the employee has superannuated or going to retire shortly and no period of service is left to his credit;

(III) where the workman has been rendered incapacitated to discharge the duties and cannot be reinstated and / or

(IV) when he has lost confidence of the Management to discharge duties. What is sought to be emphasized is that there may be appropriate case on facts which may justify substituting the order of reinstatement by award of compensation, but that has to be supported by some legal and justifiable reasons indicating why the order of reinstatement should be allowed to be substituted by award of compensation.

The same principles have been laid down in case of Deepali Gundu Surwase versus Kranti Junior AdhyapakMahavidyalaya and others reported in 2013(1) SCC-324.

14. In recent case, Civil Appeal no. 124-125 of 2019 decided by Apex Court on 7-1-2019 also requires to be mentioned in this respect. Para-11 of said judgment is being reproduced as under:-

It is apposite to reproduce what this Court has held in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra):

"33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of reinstatement with fullback wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in allcases. While that may be a position whereservices of a regular/permanent workman areterminated illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimization, unfair labor practice, etc. However, when it comes to the case of termination of a dailywage worker and where the termination is found illegal because of a procedural defect, namely, in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking the view that in such cases reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction is obvious.

34. The reasons for denying the relief ofreinstatement in such cases are obvious. It istrite law that when the termination is foundto be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services ofthat employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has noright to seek regularisation [see State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)17]. Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has noright to continue even2734 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to beserved in reinstating such a workman and hecan be given monetary compensation by theCourt itself inasmuch as if he is terminatedagain after reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form ofretrenchment compensation and notice pay.

In such a situation, giving the relief ofreinstatement, that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.

"35. We would, however, like to add a caveathere. There may be cases where terminationof a daily wage worker is found to be illegalon the ground that it was resorted to asunfair labor practice or in violation of the principle of last come first go viz. whileretrenching such a worker daily wage juniorsto him were retained. There may also be asituation that persons junior to him wereregularised under some policy but theworkman concerned terminated. In suchcircumstances, the terminated worker shouldnot be denied reinstatement unless there aresome other weighty reasons for adopting thecourse of grant of compensation instead ofreinstatement. In such cases, reinstatementshould be the rule and only in exceptionalcases for the reasons stated to be in writing,such a relief can be denied."

Now considering the claim of reinstatement of the workman in the light of principles of law laid down in the referred cases from the evidence on record, it is proved that the workman has been in engagement of the management Bank since April 2002. He has specifically stated on oath that he has not been in gainful engagement since after the date of his disengagement and there is no rebuttal by employers. This is established that he has passed the period of his life in which he could be eligible or could apply for any other employment as he has crossed that age during his this engagement also that he has not reached the age of superannuation or has not been incapacitated by any intervening disability to continue in engagement. In these circumstances, it is just and proper and in the ends of justice if he is reinstated on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date of his disengagement till date of reinstatement.Accordingly, the workman is held entitled to be reinstated on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % back wages and all consequential benefits from the date of his disengagement till date of reinstatement.

Point No.2 is decided accordingly.

In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri

Vinod Kumar Srivas is not legal and justified.

(2) The management of Central Bank of India is directed to reinstate workman Vinod Kumar Srivas

on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date

of his disengagementwith all consequential benefits till date of reinstatement.

Amount as per above order shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award. In case of default, amount shall carry 9% interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.

Dated : 3-4-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 670-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ cSad vkWQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 94@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]

lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2735

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 94/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26/04/2019.

[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]

SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL

GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS

COMPLEX : NEW DELHI

ID No. 94/2014

Smt. Kamla Devi w/o. Shri Makhan Lal Through Delhi Karamchari Union (Regd.) 52-C, Okha Estate Phase-3, New Delhi 110020. r/o. 8/3 G-Block, Sangam Vihar, New Delhi 110062. …Workman/Claimant

Versus

The Branch Manager Bank of Baroda, L-43, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019. …Management

AWARD

This Award shall decided a claim petition directly filed by the claimant under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short "the Act") with the averments that the claimant Smt. Kamla Devi had been working as Safai Karamchari since January, 2011 with Management Bank at its Kalkajit Branch and her drawn wages were Rs.6000/- per month. She always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy. She was neither given any appointment letter, nor minimum wages and over time, casual leave etc., though the claimant made demand for the same. The Management terminated the services of the claimant on 3/10/2013 without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act. It is pleaded that the Management used to get signatures of the claimant on blank vouchers and plain papers which the claimant had done under pressure as the Management used to extend threat of terminating her services time and again. The Management even did not pay to her earned wages for the months of August, September and October, 2013. A demand notice dated 7/10/2013 was sent to the Management but to no response. The claimant thereafter approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail . The workman/claimant is unemployed since the day of termination of her services by the Management, though she made efforts to find a job.

2. The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its written statement and took preliminary objections inter-alia that there is no employer-employee relationship between the claimant and the Management, as the claimant never worked with the Management since its opening in the year 2012. It is alleged that claim of the claimant to the effect that she started working at Kalkaji Branch of the Bank since January, 2011, is false inasmuch as Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on 22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. All other averments made by the claimant regarding obtaining her signatures on blank vouchers/papers and/or payment of less wages have been totally denied by the Management.

3) The claimant/workman filed rejoinder wherein she denied all the allegations made by the Management and reiterated her own case as set up in the claim petition.

4) On the pleadings of the parties, this Tribunal vide order dated 28/04/2016 framed following issues :-

(i) Whether termination of the workman with effect from 3/10/2013 is arbitrary and illegal and the workman is liable to be reinstated as alleged ?

(ii) Whether Kalkaji branch of the Management was opened on 31/3/2012 ? If so, its effect ?

2736 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

(iii) Whether the workman has never worked in Kalkaji Branch, as alleged and as such there was no relationship of employer-employee between the parties ?

6) The Claimant in support of her case examined herself as W.W.1 and tendered her affidavit Ex.WW1/A alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/3.

7) On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Aditya Ravi, Chief Manager of Management who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/3.

8) I have carefully gone through the evidence adduced on record by both the parties and have give my thoughtful consideration to rival contentions of Shri B.S.Rawat, A./R for the claimant and Shri B.S.Chauhan, A/R for the Management. My findings on above issues are as follows.

Issue No.2 :-

9. Onus to prove this issue was upon the Management, inasmuch as it was alleged by the Management that claim of the claimant that she had started working with the Management Bank from January, 2011 is incorrect because Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on 22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. To prove its case, the Management examined MW1- Mr.Aditya Ravi who has filed on record copy of the lease deed in respect of premises where Kalkaji Branch was opened viz. ground floor of L-43 Kalkaji New Delhi as Ex.MW1/1, which goes to show that premises in question was leased to the Management Bank w.e.f.1/4/2012 for a term of 10 years. MW 2 Ankit Palta, another witness of the Management has filed on record copy of the letter dated 15/3/2012 of Reserve Bank of India as Ex.MW2/3 which shows that MICR code in respect of Kalkaji Branch was allotted to the Management Bank by the Reserve Bank of India. No contrary thereto has been adduced by the claimant. The aforesaid documents substantiate the plea of the Management that Kalkji Branch was opened (soft lunched) on 31/3/2012. Consequently, the plea of the claimant that she had started working with the Management from January, 2011 is not acceptable. This issue is decided accordingly in favour of the Management.

Issue No. 3 :-

10. Ld. A/R appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the Management & claimant as she never worked with the Management what to talk from January,2011. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant to prove that she was in the employment of the Management Bank and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year.

10) Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimant submitted during the course of arguments that the claimant was working as Part Time Sweeper with the Management Bank since 2012 though claimant due to illiteracy and ignorance of exact date, averred in the claim petition that she was engaged in January, 2011. It was also submitted that services of the claimant were illegally terminated on 3/10/2013.

12- There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.

12- This Tribunal has to consider the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on record so as to decide the question of relationship of employer and employee between the Management and the claimant herein. In this respect, it is appropriate to refer to the affidavit ExWW1/A of the claimant. It is clear from the perusal of the affidavit Ex.WW1/A that it is in consonance with the pleadings i.e. statement of claim filed by the claimant. It is the specific case of the Management that the claimant never worked with the Management at any point of time. MW1 Aditya Ravi clarified in his cross examination that he had taken charge of the post of Branch Manager of Kalkaji Branch (which was a new branch) on 1st May, 2012 and at that time there was no official/Safai Karamchari at the said branch. He volunteered that cleaning (of bank premises) was taken care of by the landlord. Thereafter Shri Neeru was posted by the competent authority to clean the branch. He admitted that he has not filed on record any document to show that Shri Neeru was engaged as sub-staff (for cleaning the bank premises). He also admitted that vouchers Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-19 bear his signatures and tried to explain that payment shown in those vouchers are with respect to cleaning of fans, computers, Air conditioners, telephones, FAX machines including sweeping etc., However, a careful perusal of these vouchers (Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-9) shows that these have been drawn for "sundry charges" regarding payment made towards sweeping of the bank premises. First voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 (dated 30/6/2012) is[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2737 towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamla; second voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/8/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamlesh; third voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/9/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Maya; Similarly are the other vouchers showing payment of sweeping charges made to different persons named as Sarabjit, Manju Devi, Geeta Devi, Kamni, Anita, Gaya Lal, Mohan, Jai Kishan, Gopal, Jogi, Raju, Mr. Mohan, Geeta, Raju, Jogi, Raju and last voucher dated 17/12/13 for Rs.900/- is in the name of Gopi. The plea of the Management that the claimant never worked with it any any point of time is belied from the document/payment voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 which payment has been made in favour of the claimant Smt.Kamla. It is common knowledge that the payment through vouchers is made by the Banks to the workers engaged on part time basis including Part Time Sweeper for sweeping and dusting the bank premises and further that, the Branch Manager concerned has been given powers to engage such workers.

13- It is a matter of record that an application under Section 11(3)(b) of the Act filed on behalf of the claimant was partly allowed by this Tribunal and Management Bank was directed to produce certain documents vis-à-vis Name of the Safai Karamchari/Chowkidar alongwith wage slip, mode of payment etc. The Management failed to produce the said documents excepting the payment vouchers and as such, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the Management for non production of such documents. It is very astonishing that payment towards sweeping charges has been debited by the Management Bank through monthly vouchers but in different names. The Management Bank has neither explained as to why vouchers have been issued in different names, nor has filed details of such Part Time Sweepers engaged by it. It appears that same has been done just to deprive the claimant to seek other facilities. In the circumstances, I find force in the submission of the claimant that she always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy and did not issue her any appointment letter. I am of the opinion that the there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein and that the claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till 30/9/2013 and that her services were terminated by the Management on 3/10/2013. Consequently, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the claimant is a "workman" within the definition of Section 2(S) of the Act even if she was engaged on part time basis. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-

"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of

service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a

person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not

make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.

There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person

employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one

employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty

for fixed hours is not a workman.

It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.

14. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is held that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein. This issue is accordingly decided in favour of the claimant and against the Management.

Issue No.1 :-

15- The vital question for consideration is as to whether termination of the claimant is illegal and against the provisions of the Act. Testimony of the claimant that the Management terminated her services on 3/10/2013 without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, has gone unassailed and unchallenged, inasmuch as the case of the Management was that the claimant was never employed/engaged by it. However, this Tribunal while deciding issue No.3 has already held that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and the claimant and further that, claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till the date of her termination on 3/10/2013. Admittedly, the Management bank has not issued any notice to the claimant before ordering her termination, nor has paid one month's salary in lieu of such notice as required under Section 25-F of the Act. I may mention that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act which provides for conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen, are absolute and inexorable and it reads as under :-

"25-F : Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen –

No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until –2738 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (a) The workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice;

(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed years of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months; and

(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette."

The above provision makes it clear that the employer is required to give notice to the appropriate Government apart-from giving one month's notice in writing or one month's wages in lieu of the notice and payment of retrenchment compensation to the concerned workman.

There is long line of decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of Section 25- F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render whole action of the Management Bank to be illegal and wrong under the law. As such, it is held that action of the Management in terminating/disengaging the services of the claimant herein was unjustified and illegal.

16) Now the residual question arises for consideration is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. There is pleading in the claim petition as well as evidence to the effect that the workman is unemployed since the day of her termination and has got no source of her livelihood.. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that she is in a position to make her both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or ad-hoc work to make her both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment. But at the same time this Tribunal can not ignore the fact that there is no positive evidence on record to prove that the claimant was regular employee of the Management bank or that she had applied for the post pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Bank or that her name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Latest trend itself discernable from the various pronouncements made by the Hon'ble Apex Court is that when a person has been engaged on daily wage basis or for doing temporary kinds of work, in that situation full back wages are not be awarded. There are number of factors which are required to be considered by the Tribunal while considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad Vs. Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under :-

" Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal, because of non payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation.

17) Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant, an amount of Rs.1 lakh (Rupees One Lakh) appears to be just and reasonable, and the same is payable to the claimant herein by the Management. In case this compensation amount is not paid within one month from the date of publication of this Award, then the claimant will be entitled to recover the same alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.

Award is passed accordingly.

Date : 2/4/2019

AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2739 ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 671-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eSlwj feujYl fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 96@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29012@22@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 671 .—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 96/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Mysre Minerals Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-29012/22/2007-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

BANGALORE

DATED : 10TH APRIL 2019

PRESENT : Justice Smt. Rathnakala, Presiding Officer

C.R No. 96/2007

I Party

II Party

The Managing Director, Mysore Minerals Limited, No. 39, M.G. Road, Bangalore – 560001.

Smt. Shirumaniyamma, W/o Late Munuswamy, Valagerehalli Village & Post, Bagur Hobli, Channarayapatna Taluk HASSAN DIST. Karnataka.

Advocate for I Party : Advocate for II Party:

Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda Mr. L. Venkatarama Reddy

AWARD

The Central Government vide Order No.L-29012/22/2007-IR(M) dated 21.08.2007 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for brevity 'the Act' hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.

"Whether the management of Mysore Minerals Limited is justified in terminating the services/

premature superannuating of the services of Smt. Shirumaniyamma w.e.f. 28.06.1998? If not, to what

relief the workman is entitled to?"

1. The claim brought before this Tribunal by the 1st party is :—

She joined the service of the 2nd Party Management on 12.08.19977 at its Mining Unit viz., Byrapura Chromite Mines, Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan District, as a Mining Worker under token No. 203. At the time of joining service she furnished her age as 30 years, her Date of Birth being 12.08.1947 as per the Horoscope, her age was accepted without Certificate of Registration of Birth, in all the statutory records like EPF, B-Register, Service Record same age is registered, she was entitled to continue in the service of the 2nd Party up to 12.08.2005. The 2nd Party conducted Medical Examination illegally and removed her from service; she was orally refused employment w.e.f 28.06.1998 by assigning reason that, she has passed 58 years. Some of the Co-worker who were similarly removed from service approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and by the order of the Hon'ble High Court the Management reinstated the pre-matured retired employees. At that point of time about 100 Mining workers were removed from service on Medical ground. They have not changed her Date of Birth in the Official records, 3 months notice was not issued to her neither 3 months salary was paid to her. The 2nd Party acted contrary to its own Certified Standing Order. Hence, the prayer for reinstatement with continuity of service and with full back wages.

2740 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

2. The claim allegation is countered by the Management succinctly stating that, the dispute filed after 10 years from the date of termination of service is time barred, she was given 30 days time to prefer appeal before the Appellate Medical Board as per rules, she did not avail the opportunity, she waited for the result of the case filed by the Co- workers who had approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. The success of W.P. No. 5615/2001 and 26101/2001 before the Hon'ble High Court Karnataka inspired her to file this dispute after lapse of 10 years.

3. Further, it is stated that the 2nd Party arranged for Medical Examination for all employees and workers during the year 1997-98 as required under Mines Rules 1995, which is a requirement under law. A team of qualified and senior Medical Officers from Hutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd., were specifically entrusted to carry out Medical Examination; the 1st Party was found incapacitated to work in Mine, since she was 58 year on the date of Medical Examination. Hence, the 2nd Party decided to terminate her service; without filling appeal she opted to receive monetary benefits arising from the termination. She has received the terminal benefit without any protest, now she has no right to raise the dispute. There is no relationship of employer and employee between the parties. Hence, the reference is not maintainable and this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference.

4. After completion of the pleadings, both parties have adduced their evidence.

5. The Management adduced evidence through its Assistant Manager, he produced photo copy of the B-Register maintained by the 2nd Party, according to which her Date of Birth is 12.08.1947. During his cross-examination the documents confronted to him from the 1st Party were identified and marked as Ex W-1 to Ex W-6; Ex W-1 is the Medical Report in Form 'O'; as per the same she is declared medically unfit due to overage, Ex W-3 is the order passed in a W.P filed by the similarly placed workmen whereby the Hon'ble High Court ordered the Authorities not to change the Date of Birth of the petitioner in the Service Register without adopting the procedure known under the law; Ex W-5 is another W.P by similarly placed workmen whereby the order passed by the Respondent was quashed and Ex W-6 is the Office Order extending the superannuation of its employees from 58 to 60 years.

6. Further, MW-1 admits that, the 1st Party workman was treated as daily wager and they have not provided working conditions as per the Mining Act. In his affidavit evidence he had averred that, as per the request made by the employees union the 2nd Party conducted the medical examination through qualified senior Medical Officer but, during cross examination he stated that, Tri-partite Settlement was made in the year 1998, it was between the Management, Mysore Minerals Employees Association and Director of Mines Safety; he experienced ignorance to the question that Mysore Minerals Employees Association represents only Clerical Staff.

7. It was further admitted by MW-1 that, despite having technical persons and machinery, in the year 1995 – 1996 2nd Party entrusted its work to Private Party and the Company suffered loss of about 21 Crores in Shimoga and Hassan District; having suffered loss the management thought of reducing the number of workers and at that juncture management ordered for Medical Examination of all the Mining Workers. It is further brought forth in his evidence that as per the Certified Standing Order of the 2nd Party Clause 18 and 24 any termination has to be followed by enquiry along with 3 months notice pay, but they had not paid 3 months salary to her; he also admits that as per Clause 18.3 of CDPR Rules change in the Date of Birth as entered in the company Records can only be effected on the Judgment of a Competent Court otherwise the Date of Birth once recorded will not be changed, he also admits that, the termination order was not attached with the copy of the Medical Certificate. Further, he admits that before removing 500 employees on the basis of medical ground, permission was not taken from the Central Government under Industrial Dispute Act. No steps were taken by the Company to obtain the permission from the Labour Ministry or Labour Secretary; he also admits that, 1st Party is a illiterate person and he was not furnished with Kannada version/translation of Medical Report.

8. The 1st Party/WW-1 during the cross-examination admitted that, she raised the dispute after the W.P filed by a co-worker was allowed and he was reinstated by the 2nd Party as per the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka.

9. By now it is clear that, for changing the Date of Birth of the 1st Party workman 2nd Party did not have either an order from the Competent Court of a Scientific Report of her age to disqualify her has unfit. Only ailment mentioned in Medical Certificate in Form-O is 'overage'; the mode adopted by them to remove other similarly placed workman is thwarted by the Hon'ble High Court and those persons were reinstated to their original post. Due to her termination on the ground of medical unfitness 1st Party workman lost 7 years of service. Though it is said that, she could have fought against the management before the Appellate Authority, one shall be reminded that, she is an illiterate, manual worker and the Medical Certificate issued to her was in English Language, and it is highly possible that she was unaware of niceties of law. Another drawback in the case of the 2nd Party is at that point of time they had removed 500 workers without obtaining permission by the Appropriate Government of the Chapter V-A of the Act, specifically in violation of sections 25F, G, H and N 2 of the Act. As admitted by the workman, she has raised the Industrial Dispute after her colleagues won the battle against the management before the Hon'ble High Court. However, it is the settled position of law that Articled 137 of the Schedule of Limitation Act is not applicable to the Industrial Dispute Act for raising the dispute.

10. Now the question is the relief that, the 1st Party is entitled to get. She has crossed the age of superannuation long back; she has raised the dispute after a delay of 6 years. Keeping a holistic view of the matter, in my considered opinion a lump sum compensation would equalise the situation; arithmetical calculation of the retrenchment calculated in accordance with Section 25-F(b) 1 month notice pay + retrenchment compensation i.e., 15 days average pay for every[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2741 completed year of continuous service or any part thereon, in case of 6 months will not condone the illegality committed by the 2nd Party. Having regard to the length of time spent the expense incurred by her in prosecuting the case, I am of the view that a lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- would be appropriated relief for her. Hence, the following

AWARD

The reference is accepted. 2nd Party is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the 1st Party

workman within 60 days from today otherwise the amount shall carry future interest of 8% per annum.

(Dictated, corrected and signed by me on 10st April, 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 672-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 15@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26011@5@2008&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-26011/5/2008-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

DATED         :      1st APRIL 2019
PRESENT       :      JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No.15/2009

I Party

II Party

The General Manager, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, CHICKMAGALUR.

The General Secretary, Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union, AITUC Tamil Colony, CHICKMAGALUR.

Appearances

I Party : Shri Muralidhara, Advocate

II Party : Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate

1. The Central Government vide order No.L-26011/5/2008-IR(M) dated 04.03.2009 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as "The Act") (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication of the following Industrial Dispute:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Allied Construction Company in denying bonus to their workers for the year 2003 – 2004 is justified? If not, to what relief these workers are entitled to? Whether the management of Kudremukh Iron ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, as a Principal Employer, is responsible to pay bonus for the year 2003 – 2004 to the contract workers employed by its contractor M/s Allied Construction Company in the event of failure on the part of the said contractor to pay bonus for the said period to these workers? If so, to what relief the workers are entitled?"2742 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. The claim set forth by the 1stParty is, the 2ndParty management is the Principle Employer and they worked under the Contractor; the contractor has employed 75 workers for the works to carry out by the Principle Employer. The workers continued to work under different contractors. During 2000 – 2001 they were working under Alpha Tech Nirman Private Limited, who replaced the earlier contractor; without break the workmen have continued to work; they are entitled for bonus for the year 2003 – 2004; they are paid bonus for the financial years 1998 - 1999, 1999 – 2000, the earlier contractor used to pay bonus in the form of exgratia, adhoc amount etc., they have worked continuously for the year 2003 – 2004, hence, entitled for bonus for the said period. II Party earned profit for the year 2003 – 2004. Thus, they are entitled for maximum bonus, they are denied statutory bonus of 8.33 %. The Principle Employer is responsible to ensure payment of statutory bonus but it has failed to comply its legal obligations. Hence, prayer for a direction to the 2nd Party to pay @ 20 % Bonus to the workman employed by them for the financial year 2003 – 2004 with a further direction to Principle Employer to pay the said amount.

3. 2nd Party contested the claim; they have stated that it is not responsible for payment of bonus or any benefit. As per the work order in favour of II party, they were obliged to abide by the terms of the Contract Labour (R&A) act, Minimum Wages Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, PF Act, Mines act.

4. The contractor engaged few casual workers to carry out certain jobs on temporary basis for a specified period. 2nd Party ensured Minimum Wages, PF contribution, safety applications etc., which they did. The dispute is raised after a lapse of 5 to 6 years. The workers having settled all their dues have now raised this dispute for bonus which is purely between them and the contractor.

5. To substantiate their contention 2nd Party placed on record, the evidence of its Assistant Manager (Personnel) along with the documents Work Order, Contractors Licence, the Renewal Licence, its Registration Certificate (Ex M-1 to Ex M-4). During the cross-examination the witness admits that 2nd Party did not verify whether the contractor paid the bonus for the workers for the period 2003 -2004.

6. The 1st party who all along prosecuted the case has opted not to adduce rebuttal evidence Ex M-1/the work order does not incorporate in itself such burden on the II Party to payment of bonus to the workman; it is not the statutory bonus of 8.33% which the 1st Party are claiming. Their claim is 20% in respect of the year 2003- 2004.The dispute is raised in the year 2009; they have no grievance in respect of any legal dues from the contractor; at this point of time where they have severed relationship by accepting their dues from their employer, there is no justification to pass on the burden on the Principle Employer for the payment of bonus. Security Amount / Bank guarantee which the employer will be holding against the contractor will not operate after cessation of their contractual relationship. In that view of the matter, there is no justification on behalf of the II Party No. 2 in denying bonus for the year 2003 – 2004. Hence,

AWARD

Reference is Rejected

(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 673-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 45@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26011@3@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2743

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT

DATED : 1st APRIL 2019

PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

C R No.45/2009

I Party

II Party

The General Manager, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, CHICKMAGALUR.

The General Secretary, Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union, AITUC Tamil Colony, CHICKMAGALUR.

Appearances

I Party    :    Shri Muralidhara, Advocate
II Party   :    Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate

AWARD

1. The Central Government vide order No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M) dated 10.09.2009 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as "The Act") (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the following schedule:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd. in not regularizing the services of 24 workers mentioned in the list enclosed is legal and correct? To what relief they are entitled to and from which date?"

2. The claim of the I Party Union is that the I Party Union represents the workman employed in the Coffee Curing establishments and other general service industries. The workman employed in various canteens run and maintained by II Party is its members. 2nd party is engaged in Mining and Processing Iron Ore and has legal obligation to run and maintain industrial canteen for the benefit of it's employees. It runs a canteen in Crush and Concentrator Department through a committee constituted for this purpose and subsidises the business day today affairs like deciding menu hygiene etc is handled by the canteen committee. It has given rent free accommodation, free electricity, water, gas and other items to run the canteen, furniture, utensils and other equipment is also provided; wages are paid directly by the II party to the employees of the canteen. The workman serving in the canteen are not paid wages as per standard wages. Their service is exploited. The administrative control appointment, promotions, disciplinary jurisdiction over the canteen is exercised by the II Party. All these years the workers had legitimate expectation that they will be absorbed in the service of the company, the II party when requested did not accept to regularise their service. Hence, the claim for direction to the II party to absorb them in the service of the II Party w.e.f. the date of joining the service etc. 3. The claim is countered by 2nd Party. It is stated that the 1st Party union is an outsider, not recognized by the 2nd Party and it has no locus standi to raise the dispute. All the I Party employees are the employees of the contractor H S Hiryanna and the 2ndParty is the Principal Employer. The contract with H S Hiryanna will end by 31.07.2010. The contractor has been awarded contract by following the due procedure. The contractor is a necessary party to this dispute. Hiriyanna is a licenced contractor. His contract is extended from 01.02.20019 for another 11 months. The Senior Manager (P L E) has issued a letter dated 14.07.2008 that contract will end by 30.06.2010 and he has to return the properties of the company. There are no sanctioned posts as far as Crush and Concentrator Department is concerned. There is no question of regularisation of the erst while contract employees. They do not intend to continue the contract of any contractor w.e.f. 01.08.2010.Now the mining is closed as per the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court. Strength of employees is decreased from 2200 to 415, they do not require additional canteen.

4. It is further stated, that the canteen workers are engaged by the contractor not by the II Party. The contract was awarded based on the tender process. Wages to the workers is paid by contractor. Management of the II party has no control over the canteen workers regarding engagement, supervision and control. A canteen management committee consisting of management representative and workers representative oversees functioning of the area, quality of food, cleanliness and hygine, etc., rent free accommodation and other facilities are provided as per the terms of the contract, for the welfare of the employees. There is no Master and Servant relationship between the II Party and the workers. The management ensures payment of minimum wages, PF Recovery and workman compensation by the contractor. The claim is not justified.

5. On completion of the pleadings to discharge the burden of proving the issue the management examined two witnesses and rebuttal evidence is not adduced. Both have submitted their arguments.

6. The first witness examined by the II Party was the Senior Manager (Personal) / MW1 the second witness was the Deputy Manager (HR) / MW 2. MW 1 produced the documents Ex M-1 to Ex M-8 pertaining to the contract awarded to Hiriyanna and extension of tenure of vide letter dated 14.07.2010/Ex M-8 of the Senior Manager. Hiriyanna is informed about the closure of period of contract on 13.07.2018 with a direction to handover the properties belonging2744 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] to the company. During his cross-examination the 1stParty confronted certain documents which the witness admitted. They are the Annual Subscription to the provident fund scheme pertaining to three workers in the name of the II Party (Ex W-1), One PF Slip pertains to H S Hiryanna (Ex W-1(a)); wage registers with the name of H S Hiriyanna as one of the worker (Ex W-2); three wage slips under the name of the establishment H S Hiryanna (Ex W-4).

7. MW 2 brought on record that the closure procedure is on and the possession of the mines has to be handed over to the officer designated by the ministry. Many of the regular employees were transferred to other places and others have opted for VRS. For the benefit of continuing employees canteen facility is continued. He produced the Original Work Order issued to the contractor during February 2009 and also subsequent extension of contract, the licence obtained by the contractor under Contract Labour Regulation & Abolition Act is also produced. During his further course of examination in chief he placed on record the mining operation is stopped w.e.f. 01.01.2006 vide orders of the apex court dated 30.10.2002 in I A 670/2001 in WP(C) No. 202/1995 and dated 12.05.2006 in I A 1150/2003, IA no. 1010/2003 in WP (C) No. 202/1995 the mine is taken over by Sh. B Ram Mohan, Regional Controller of Mines, Indian Bureau of Mines, Ministry of Mines, on 03.04.2014. Kudremukh Mining and Beneficiation Equipments are sold to Annam Steels Private Limited as per sale contract dated 12.12.2012 and they are dismantling the equipment's, the supporting documents are Ex M-13 and Ex M-14.

8. During the cross-examination it was brought forth that now the earlier casual workers are employed to work in the canteen on contract basis. It was also suggested because of the management concerned 24 workmen were not listed in the voters list by the Union, which the witness denied. 9. Despite the strong case set up by the 2nd Party that 1stParty are employed under H S Hiriyanna who is a licenced contractor, 1st Party have opted not to adduced rebuttal evidence. 10. Thus an opportunity to canvass before this tribunal about their case to the effect that it was a sham and bogus contract and they are really the workman of the II Party is lost for them. As such H S Hiriyanna subsequently raised a dispute challenging his termination which is adjudicated today (in C R No. 06/2014). Whatever observation made in the said case applies to the present case also. The Points of reference presupposes that the 1stParty 24 workers are the workmen of the 2ndParty.When it is shown by the 2nd Party that Hiriyanna had employed 17 workers, the 1st Party failed to demonstrate that the dispute is espoused on behalf of 24 workers working at Crush and Concentrator Department.Now, the law is very much settled that when a recognized union or inside union is not co-operating with the workman having dispute with its employer, there is no illegality on the part of outside union espousing the dispute. The question is only with regard to the identity of the canteen workers. The documents marked through the management witness are insufficient to hold that they were working directly under the control and supervision of the II Party management. MW 2 has clarified that the II Party used to disburse the wages to the workmen on behalf of the contractor. If their service is terminated without following the mandatory procedure by Section 25(F) of the Act, the proper party to answer the claim is H S Hiriyanna who held the licence for catering in the 2nd Party but he figures in the list of the 1st Party workmen. The facilities provided to the canteen is a welfare measure for the benefit of the employees of the II Party. It is nowhere shown that these workmen worked against any sanctioned post. On the top of it the mining operation itself has closed and the work force has migrated. In the light of the above, the tribunal does not find any irregularity in not regularising the service of 24 workers who worked in the canteen. Hence,

AWARD

Reference is Rejected (Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)

JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 674-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ;wukbVsM bf.M;k b';ksjsa'k dEiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 12@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&17012@146@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of M/s United India Insurance Company Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18.4.2019.

[No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2745

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,

ERNAKULAM

Present: Shri V. Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer.

(Thursday the 2nd day of April, 2019)

ID No.12/2015

Workman : Shri.Vijayan Pillai.P.,

Sikha Bhavanam,

Panayam, Kollam.

By Adv. B.Mohanlal

Management : 1) The General Manager,

United India Insurance Company Ltd., Head Office, Chennai.

2) The Deputy General Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Regional Office, Kochi.

By Adv. T.J.Lakshmanan and M/s. B.S.Krishnan Associates This case coming up for hearing on 02.04.2019, this Tribunal cum Labour Court passed the following on the same day.

AWARD

In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of subsection (1) subsection (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act 1947 the Central Government/Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M) dated 19.02.2015 referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication.

2. The dispute is

"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. United India Insurance Company limited is denying

the pay arrears and statutory benefits of Shri.Vijayan Pillai, Ex-caretaker of the Training Institute of the

Company on his termination is correct? If not, then what relief workman is entitled to?"

3. While the pleadings were being finalized, the Management raised a preliminary issue regarding the maintainability of the dispute and reference. According to the Management the only issue to be answered is whether there is denial of pay arrears or statutory benefits to the workman on his termination and if so what is the relief that he is entitled to. Legality or justifiability of the termination is not a question referred for adjudication. S.2A was introduced as per Industrial Dispute Amendment Act, 1965. Tracing the legislative history, it was pointed out by the learned Counsel for the Management that S.2A was incorporated into Industrial Dispute Act to enable individual workman to challenge dismissal and discharge without being sponsored by the Union or a number of workmen. Hence it is mandatory that legality or justifiability of termination is part of the reference and dispute, when an individual workman invokes S.2A(I) for adjudication of his claim.

4. The Counsel for the workman submitted that he challenged the legality of termination also before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), however the reference is silent on same. Hence he again moved the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) for modification of the reference and to include the challenge of illegality of his termination. His application was disposed of by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) holding that the dispute raised by the workman is pending before this court. Further the Counsel for the workman submitted that inspite of the above How, this dispute can be entertained by this Court under section 2(A)(2) of Industrial Dispute Act. He further submitted that there are authorities to support his argument. But he failed to produce any authority inspite of the fact that adequate time was given for production of the same.

5. The specific issue to be decided is,

"Whether a reference under S.2(A)(I) read with S.10(I)(d) of Industrial dispute Act. 1947 is maintainable when the eligibility or justifiability of termination is not referred for adjudication."

6. As per S.2(A)(I) of the Act, when an employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the services of an individual workman any dispute or difference between that workman and his employee connected with or arising out of such termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute. From the language of the section it is clear that only disputes relating to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of individual workman will fall within the purview of the Section. Any dispute connected with or arising out of such termination implies that the legality or justifiability of the termination itself shall be under challenge.

2746 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

7. The Counsel for the workman strongly argued that this court can decide the dispute invoking section 2(A)(2) of the ID Act. As per Section 2(A)(2), a workman specified in section 2(A)(I) can move the Labour court or Tribunal for the adjudication of the dispute. There is no provision under the Act to convert a reference under Section 10 read with Section 2(A)(1) to an application under 2(A)(2). Further an application under S.2(A)(2) shall be filed within three years of termination.

8. The learned counsel for the Management/Petitioner also pointed out that in view of the mandate under Section10(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act when the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for adjudication, this court shall confine its adjudication to those points.

In view of the above, the preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the dispute is answered in favour of the Management.

9. The first relief claimed in the claim statement by the workman is to declare the dismissal of the workman without any reason, illegal and unjust. As already pointed out, this claim of the workman is not maintainable as it is not part of the reference at all. It is seen from the records of the proceedings that the workman moved the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) on 05.07.2016 for amending the reference.

Because of the pendency of this Industrial Dispute, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) refused to entertain the amendment application. In view of the finding in the preliminary issue, nothing remains in this reference for adjudication.

For the reasons stated above an award is passed dismissing the claim of the workman as not maintainable.

The award will come into force one month after publication in the official gazette. Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and passed by me on this the 2nd day of April, 2019.

V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer

APPENDIX

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 675-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ;wukbVsM ÝsV dSfj;j izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&26012@1@2016&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 23/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in the relation to the management of M/s United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18.4.2019.

[No. L-26012/1/2016-IR(M)] D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT

HYDERABAD

Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer

Dated the 28th day of February, 2019

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 23/2016

Between:

Sri Mulakapalli Raju, S/o Late Chinna Rao, D.No.26-1-16/9, S.C. Colony, Chinagantyada, Gajuwada, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)

…Petitioner[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2747

AND

1. M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited, D.no.7-4-32, Chettivanipalem, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam – 530026.

2. M/s. Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co., 'Kalyani', 9/2, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam (A.P.) – 530 017. …Respondents

Appearances:

For the Petitioner         :       Sri Paila Srinivasa Rao, Advocate
For the Respondents        :       Sri A.S. Rama Sarma, Advocate for R2

AWARD

The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 26012/1/2016-IR(M) dated 15.2.2016/ 17.2.2016 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workman. The reference is,

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam and Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co. Visakhapatnam (Contrator of RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant) in termination of Shri Mulkapalli Raju, Ex-contract worker in violation of Section 25(F) of Industrial Disputes Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?"

On receipt of the reference it is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 23/2016 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.

2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner Union.

3. Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner Workman to attend the court to prosecute the case. But the Petitioner workman failed to attend this Tribunal which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner workman has already been settled and the Petitioner has got nothing to raise any claim against the Respondents. Hence, the case of the Petitioner workman is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.

Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.

Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.

MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent

NIL

NIL

Documents marked for the Petitioner

NIL

Documents marked for the Respondent

NIL

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 676-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ts;wMh lhesUV fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 89@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&29011@13@2015&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo2748 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s JUD Cements Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. L-29011/13/2015-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 89 of 2015

Parties : Employers in relation to the management of CMD, JUD Cements Limited

AND

Their workmen

Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance:

On behalf of the Management      :       None
On behalf of the Workmen         :       None
Dated: 12th April, 2019.                                                                  Industry: Cement

AWARD

By Order No.L-29011/13/2015-IR(M) dated 28.10.2015 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of JUD Cements Ltd. by not paying full & final payment to its

employee Shri Sudhansu Gantayet, Ex-Vice President (operation) is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief

workman is entitled to?"

2. When the case is taken up for hearing on 02.04.2019, none appeared for the parties concerned. In fact the parties never appeared before this Tribunal. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since 30.11.2015 and inspite of all the opportunities, neither the workman concerned has filed his statement of claim, nor the management has filed its written statement to proceed further with the case.

4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the workman has no grievance at present in respect of his full and final payment as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.

5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 12th April, 2019.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 677-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dsUnzh; Hk.Mkj.k fuxe ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 58@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&42011@1@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Central Warehousing Corporation and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-42011/1/2014-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2749

ANNEXURE

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

Reference No. 58 of 2014

Parties: Employers in relation to the management of the Regional Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation AND

Their workmen.

Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer

Appearance :

On behalf of the Management : None

On behalf of the Workmen : None Dated: 22nd April, 2019. Industry : Warehousing

AWARD

By Order No.L-42011/1/2014-IR(M) dated 04.07.2014 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:

"Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation in not relieving all workmen I

the transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 & arbitrarily choosing the workmen to be relieved in unfair manner is

legal and/or justified? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?"

2. In this reference case both the union and the management previously entered appearance through their respective learned counsel. Union filed its statement of claim praying for implementing transfer orders dated 28.08.2013 and 05.10.2013 issued by the Assistant Manager (Amin). Management filed its written statement denying the claim of the union. Union also filed its rejoinder to counter the statement of the management. Photo copies of some documents have also been filed by the union to support its case. But the union, as it transpires from record, remained absent since 04.07.2018. Inspite of sufficient opportunity the union has not led any evidence to substantiate its case. It also transpires from record that the union refused to receive the notice dated 12.06.2018 issued by this Tribunal.

3. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at present in respect of not relieving the workmen as per transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.

4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.

Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata,

The 22nd April, 2019.

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 678-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 7@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- tsM&16025@4@2019&vkbZvkj¼,e½]

Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.

[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]

D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.

2750 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,

AHMEDABAD

Present :

Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad,

Dated 04th April, 2019

Complaint (CGITA) No. 07/2004

(Old Complaint (ITC) No. 8/2010)

Senva Ambalal, Village Kathwada, Tal. Matar, Navgam, Kheda (Gujarat) C/o Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union, 434-46, Gandhivas, Koba Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Complainant

V/s

1. M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,

Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana (Gujarat)

2. M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd.,

19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

3. The G.G.M. (P),

ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

4. The General Manager (OBG),

ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)

…Respondents

For the Complainant : Sh. Arish L. Saiyed

For the Opponent No.1 : Absent

For the Opponent No.2 : Absent

For the Opponent No. 3 & 4 : Shri K.V. Gadhia & Shri M.K. Patel

ORDER

1. This is a complaint Ex. 1 moved under Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act by the complainant Senva Ambalal on 17.02.2000 in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 alleging that the complainant has been working with the opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana under sham arrangement of contract on the establishment of opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad and opposite party no. 4 The General Manager, ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, so called real employer. The opposite party no. 1 was later changed by the opposite party no. 2 M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd., 19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad. He has further alleged that he has also been a workman in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 shown at serial no. 48 in the list attached with the reference. He has been working at the establishment of ONGC at GGS II (OEG) since 08.01.1987 without any break with full satisfaction of the supervisors. He worked during January 1999, February 1999 and March 1999, thereafter for 4 days in April 1999 but he was not paid the wages for the said period despite making written representation to ONGC. He has further alleged that he has been working since 1987 but his services were terminated orally without paying any notice and notice pay. Therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with full back wages and the unpaid as stated above.

2. All the parties were issued notice but only the opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad submitted the written statement Ex. 4 submitting that there was no master servant relationship with the workman and ONGC and after enquiry, no such workman was found on the muster roll of ONGC. He never made any representation to the ONGC for pending of wages; therefore, the complaint is liable to be rejected.

3. Earlier the complainant has deposed vide Ex. 5 and reiterated the facts stated in the complaint, thereafter the complaint was proceeded ex-parte and the then Presiding Officer, Shri B.I. Kazi passed the order ex-parte and allowed the complaint with 60% back wages.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2751

4. Against the said ex-parte award, the opposite party ONGC has filed Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 for restoration of Complainant (CGITA) No. 07/2004 and said Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 was allowed by the State Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 14.09.2010.

5. After the restoration of the complaint, the complainant Ambalal K. Senva has expired on 14.10.2009 and legal heirs of the complainant Paresh Ambalal Senva moved an application Ex. 23 which was allowed on 26.07.2017 and legal heirs were substituted accordingly in place of deceased complainant.

6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:

i. Whether the deceased complainant Ambalal Sanva was a contract employee and the contract was sham and bogus?

ii. Whether the complainant was the employee of ONGC?

iii. To what relief, if any, the legal heir of the deceased complainant is entitled?

7. Issue No. i, ii and iii: As all the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The legal heirs of the complainant filed an affidavit 24 reiterating the averments made in the complaint. In his cross-examination, he has stated that besides him, his mother and sisters are the legal heirs of his deceased father. He is working as a security guard in a company through contractor who is also a contractor of ONGC. He has stated that his deceased father was also a contract labour. He does not know as to whether ONGC has given any appointment letter to his father or not. He has further stated that the contractor paid the wages to his father. He does not have any proof to show that his father was served with the contractor for more than 240 days in any calendar year. His father was received wages for the days he used to work. His father has maintained the whole family till his death.

8. From the pleadings of the parties and oral evidence available on record, it is established that the deceased complainant was the employee of contractor M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd. ONGC has no master and servant relationship with the deceased complainant, therefore, ONGC bears no liability regarding the deceased complainant. Considering the above stated facts and settled legal position by the apex court that even in non-compliance of Section 25 F with the daily wager, proper relief to be granted is compensation and not reinstatement as held by the apex court in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited V/s Mansingh, 2012 (1) SCC 558. Since the complainant was expired on 14.10.2009 i.e. during the pendency of the complaint, hence even on this point, the complainant is not entitled to get reinstated. As held by the apex court in various pronouncements, the legal heirs of the complainant are entitled to get lump-sum compensation. Thus it would be appropriate to award a lump-sum compensation of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant in lieu of back wages and all other employment dues. No relief can be granted against ONGC. All the issues are decided accordingly.

9. The opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant within 60 days from the publication of this order.

10. The order is passed accordingly.

P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 679-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 127@2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@30@2005&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 127/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12012/30/2005-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

2752 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/127/2005

General Secretary, Nationalised Bank Karmchari Sangathan, 9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain.

…Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager (O), State Bank of Indore, Head Office, Indore (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 28th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 11-11-2005 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/30/2005-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of

Head Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as

"off duty" after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri

Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified? If not, what relief he is entitled?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman has stated that he was first appointed as clerk cum cashier with the Vidisha branch of the Bank on 8-6-77. During the course of service, he was transferred at Nateran branch and was posted as Head cashier in the year 1982. He was issued a charge sheet by the department on the basis of information, given by the Branch Manager of the Bank on 16-3-1985. This charge sheet was further amended and an amended charge sheet dated 9-4-85 was issued, he filed a written reply of the charge sheet. Mr. J.C.Mahajan was appointed as Enquiry Officer who conducted enquiry without allowing the workman to bring his representative. The Presenting Officer persuaded the workman to admit the charges and it is on his persuasion, he admitted the charges. The Enquiry Officer filed an Enquiry Report dated 12-6-85 holding the workman guilty. The finding was against fact and evidence because there was no witness to examine during the enquiry to prove the charges. The appointing authority passed order of dismissal on the basis of Enquiry Report without giving any opportunity of personal hearing on the proposed sentence. The workman filed an appeal before the departmental Appellate Authority who set aside the termination and passed the impugned punishment regarding stoppage of Head cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as of treating suspension period as "off duty" which is against law and against bipartite settlement above mentioned. Accordingly. the workman prayed for setting aside of impugned punishment and back wages accordingly.

3. The employer Bank, in their Written statement of defense just raised the preliminary objection that since the workman has now been promoted as Manager and posted in Vidisha Branch, he cannot be treated as a workman as defined under Section 2(s) of ID Act, 1947, hence the reference is not maintainable before the Tribunal. It was also pleaded that during the period workman was posted in Nateran branch, complaints of grave misconduct and misbehavior were received against him. He was suspended on 24-1-1985 and chargesheet dated 16-3-1985 , which was amended and amended chargesheet dated 9th April 1985 were served on him. The charges were that on 29th September 1984, workman refused to open the cash safe of the branch adversely affecting the working of Bank, on that date, he did not furnish his cash scroll to the Manager and other 3 charges regarding misappropriation of money and in subordination, mentioned in the para-9 of Written Statement asunder-

1. The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;

2. On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;

3. On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;

4. On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984 whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2753

5. The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).

4. It was further pleaded that the workman filed a written explanation for the charges vide his letter dated 27-3- 1985 which were not satisfactory and a regular DE was instituted. The workman unconditionally admitted all the charges without any fear or coercion. He refused to cross-examine any witness, he also refused to adduce any evidence in his defense and on the basis of his plead, held guilty. The Enquiry Officer filed his report dated 12-6-1985 holding the charges proved against the workman. After receiving the Enquiry Report, workman was issued show cause notice on the point of proposed sentence of dismissal on 12-6-1985. He filed written reply of the notice on 4-7-85. After considering the material, a sentence regarding dismissal was passed by Appointing Authority on 7-7-85. Workman preferred a departmental appeal which was disposed vide order dated 4-7-86 setting aside the dismissal and passing the impugned punishment as mentioned. It was further pleaded that the Departmental Enquiry was conducted legally and properly and sentence imposed is not shockingly dis- appropriate to the charges proved.

5. On the basis of respective pleadings, preliminary issue/ point for determination regarding fairness and legality of departmental enquiry was framed by his learned predecessor. Preliminary issue was decided by my learned predecessor vide order dated 25-4-2017 whereby he held the Departmental Enquiry proper and legal. This order shall be part of this award. Following other issues were framed:-

(2) Whether the charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings?

(3) Whether the punishment of stoppage of Head Cashier Allowance and two annual increments and compulsory retirement imposed against workman is legal and proper?

(4) If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?

6. It is further to mention here that no further evidence was adduced on the point of 3 issues as mentioned which were framed later on after deciding preliminary issue. Mr. R. Nagwanshi, representative of the Union preferred to file written argument which is on record. Learned counsel for management has also filed written argument. I have gone through the respective written argument and also the record.

7. Point for determination No.2 & 3

In his written statement of claim, workman has himself admitted that he admitted the guilt during the course of Departmental Enquiry. His case is that he did so on the promise that he will not be terminated from service. The burden is on the workman to prove this fact of the alleged assurance before the Enquiry Officer to prove his case that his admission of guilt was not unconditional rather it was after a promise given by the Bank/ Enquiry Officer. He could do so before the Appellate Authority. The records of enquiry have been proved in evidence during the hearing of preliminary issue No.1. The written admission given by the workman before the Enquiry Officer is on record which does not show that it was given involuntarily hence on the basis of admission of charges which is not disputed at any stage, it is held that charges against the workman were proved during the domestic enquiry.

I am supported by a decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Central Bank of India vs Karumamoy reported in AIR-1986-80-266 wherein it has been held that if the workman admits his guilt, then to insist upon the management to let an evidence about the allegations will be an empty formality.

8. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that charges against workman were proved during the domestic enquiry on the basis of his admission of guilt. The charges proved against workman are as under:-

1. The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;

2. On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;

3. On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;

4. On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984 whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984;

5. The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).

9. These charges relate to the dereliction of duty insubordination hence are in the category of grave misconduct warranting major punishment. The appellate authority has taken a lenient view in setting aside the termination2754 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] passed by the Appointing Authority and converting it into stoppage of Head Cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as treating suspension period as "off duty". Hence in no parameter, the charges can be held shockingly disproportionate to the charges. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.

10. Point for determination No.4-

On the basis of above discussion, the applicant is not entitled to any relief.

11. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of Head

Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as

"off duty" after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri

Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified.

(2) The workman Shri Jagdish Prasad Gautam is not entitled to any relief.

12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

Dated:28-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 680-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12011@70@2008&vkbZvkj¼ch- 1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12011/70/2008-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/66/2009

General Secretary,

Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,

F-1, Tripti Vihar, Opp. Engg. College,

Ujjain.

…Workman/Union

Versus

Chief General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Regional Head Office,

Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal. …Management

AWARD

Passed on this 27th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 1-7-2009 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12011/70/2008-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is entitled for payment of difference of

wages as per Bipartite Settlement? If yes, what relief he is entitled to?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he has claimed his dues from 1-9-95 to 1-4-02 as arrears with an allegation that he had been[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2755 working since 1-9-95 as a daily wager with the MG Road, Indore branch of the bank. He was disengaged by the employers on 1-4-2002. He raised a dispute with the Central Government and reference was made which was registered as R/132/95 and award was passed on 25-4-2014. He further stated that his wages were paid by the Bank from the profit and loss account. He is entitled to pay, details given in Para-9 & 11 of the petition. In the light of Desai Award and Ist Bipartite Agreement dated 19-10-66 which was not paid to him though he was entitled to get it. Accordingly he has sought relief regarding the payment of his arrears as mentioned above.

3. Management filed its Written Statement of defense wherein they denied that workman was engaged at any point of time with the Bank. It was further pleaded by the employers that the workman was simply engaged for 1-2 hours in a day that too purely on casual basis. He was not employed by the Bank. His engaged was against rules. He was disengaged later on. He raised dispute on the basis of which reference was made by appropriate Government to this court which was registered as CGIT/LC/R/132/05 and was answered in negative. Accordingly, he is not entitled to get regular pay scale/ difference of wages as claimed by him which is only for permanent employees.

4. Both the sides have examined on oath themselves. Workman has examined himself on oath whereas management has examined Hariom Gupta, Chief Manager on oath who have stated and supported their respective claims as mentioned above. Copy of the award dated passed in the reference case R/132/2005 is also on record. At the time of argument, none appeared from the side of Bank.

5. Mr. Ram Nagwanshi appeared as Union Representative on behalf of workman. He submitted oral argument and also filed memorandum of argument I have gone through the written argument and also gone through the records.

6. The main argument on behalf of workman is that when it is proved that he has worked with the employer Bank, he was entitled to difference of salary in the light of bipartite agreement and award as mentioned by him, details given in his statement of claim whereas the argument of the Bank is that this agreement and award applies only to regular/ permanent employees of the Bank and not to the casual labors. Hence the point for determination which arise is as under:-

"Whether it is proved that the workman has been in engagement, may be as daily wager on regular basis

or not."

Award (Copy) in the connected reference case is on record. Perusal of which reveals that the claim of workman that he worked continuously for 240 days in the preceding 12 months of his date of disengagement was not proved and accordingly his disengagement was not held violative of Section 25 B of I.D.Act. It was also held that the employers were not bound to comply the provisions of Section 25-F before his disengagement in his case and his disengagement was found legal and proper. There is nothing on record to show that this finding by the Tribunal has been overturned by any superior Court hence when it is not proved that workman has been in a regular engagement may be as a daily wager, he cannot be held entitled to any difference of pay as claimed by him under the award and bipartite agreement.

7. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that the workman Kamal Damodare is not entitled to difference of wages as per bipartite settlement.

8. In the result, award is passed as under:-

"The workman Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is not entitled for payment of

difference of wages as per Bipartite Settlement."

9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.

Dated : 27-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 681-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 165@2002½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&12012@162@2002&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]

ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo2756 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019

S.O. 681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 165/2002) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.

[No. L-12012/162/2002-IR(B-1)]

B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR

NO. CGIT/LC/R/165/2002

General Secretary,

Rashtriya Bank Karmchari Sangthan,

9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain (MP) …Workman/Union

Versus

General Manager (Operations),

State Bank of Indore,

Head Office, 5, Yeshwant Niwas Road,

Indore (MP)

…Management

AWARD

Passed on this 25th day of March 2019

1. As per letter dated 7-11-2002 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/162/2002-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:

"Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in

stopping 4 annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified?

If not, what relief the workman is entitled?"

2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman has alleged that he was first appointed on 29th August 1981 in Paitlavat branch of State Bank of Indore as a peon. During course of his employment, he was promoted as Daftary in the year 1989. In the year 1994, when he was posted in Rajgarh branch of the Bank, he was called by the then employer and was given charge of Head cashier and he worked as Head cashier, doing clerical work since 1997. It was further alleged that the Manager instructed him to issue certificate to one Suraj Pawar, on the fact that Suraj Pawar has been working since last 3 years with the Bank as a daily wager employee which he issued under the instruction of the Branch Manager. Also it was alleged that a charge sheet was issued to him with reference to this certificate and enquiry was conducted against him which was against principles of natural justice, without giving him a fair chance to put his defense and he was held guilty for the charge of issuing unauthorizedly a false certificate. It is also his case that before awarding impugned punishment, no opportunity was given to him on the point of sentence. He raised the dispute with the Government, accordingly he has claimed that the punishment being excessive be set-aside.

3. The employer bank has pleaded in his Written Statement of defense that when the applicant was posted as Daftary at Rajgarh branch, he committed certain omissions and commissions and misconduct under Ist Bipartite Settlement. He was served charge sheet alleging charges and was directed to submit a reply. He submitted a reply which was not satisfactory. Therefore a domestic enquiry was held. Mr. A.K.Joshi an officer of the Bank was deputed as Enquiry Officer and S.N.Harbude was made Presenting Officer. During the enquiry, the workman admitted the charges in writing and in view of his admission/ plead guilty, the charges were held proved by the Enquiry Officer and thereafter impugned punishment with regard to stoppage of 4 increments with cumulative effect w.e.f. 1991 was passed. Also it was pleaded that the workman did not prefer any appeal or representation and accepted the punishment and also that the enquiry was conducted properly keeping in view the principles of natural justice in mind and the punishment is not excessive.

4. On the basis of pleadings, following issues/ points for determination were framed by my learned predecessor:-

(1) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?

This issue was decided as preliminary issue vide order dated 16-9-2014. This order is also a part of this award. The domestic enquiry was held legal and properly conducted. Thereafter following other issues/ points for determination was framed by my learned predecessor-[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2757

(2) Whether charges against workman are proved?

(3) Whether punishment of with-holding 4 increments of workman is legal?

(4) What relief the workman is entitled?

5. No further evidence was adduced by any of the parties on these issues. I have heard argument of Mr.Ram Nagwanshi. None present from the side of management. no written argument were filed by management. I have gone through the record.

6. Point for determination No.2-

7. There is on record, written admission of charge filed by the workman during the enquiry. In his statement of claim also, workman has stated that he issued a certificate but on the instructions of the Manager. Hence, he does not deny the issue of certificate for which he was not authorized. His claim that this certificate was issued on instruction of Manager requires proof. The enquiry report itself states that no evidence was given by the workman during enquiry nor did he cross-examined any of the witnesses. Hence on the basis of his admission alone, the Enquiry Officer was fully justified in law and fact holding the charges against the workman proved. On the basis of above discussion, the charges levelled against workman during the domestic enquiry are held proved on the basis of his admission. Issue No.2 is answered accordingly.

8. Point for determination No.3-

9. The charge proved against workman is that he exceeded his jurisdiction and issued certificate which he was not authorized and the punishment given for the charge is stoppage of 4 increments with retrospective effect. There is nothing on record to show that this punishment is excessive. Particularly in the light of fact that there had been complaints of wrong omissions and commissions and misconduct against the workman and also that he did not improve even after the punishment and was compulsorily retired when he was found guilty for other charges of misconduct. Hence it is held that the punishment imposed is not shockingly disproportionate so as to warrant interference by this Tribunal. It should be kept in mind that this Tribunal is not an Appellate Authority regarding the disciplinary proceedings.

10. Point for determinationNo.4-

11. On the basis of above discussion, applicant is not entitled to relief claimed by him.

12. In the result, award is passed as under:-

(1) The action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in stopping 4

annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified.

(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.

13. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.

Dated:25-3-2019

P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 682-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 150@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@140@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 150 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer2758 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference : No. 150/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Katrash Area of M/S BCCL,

AND

Their workman

Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers:- Shri Rahul Kumar Mondal Dy. Manager

For the workman. :- Shri K.D.P.Yadav, President (NCWC)

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 26/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I) dated 15/07/1999 the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of BCCL in recording the age of 50 years as on 21.07.88 of Sri

Mahendra Singh, Pump Operator when his date of birth is 01.01.1949 in his service record is proper and

justified? If not, what direction is required in this respect and to what relief is the concerned workman

entitled?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and during the hearing of the case, Ld. President of Sponsoring Union has informed that workman has not been interested in contesting the case. It is felt that the workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No dispute" award is passed. communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 683-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 151@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@587@1998&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 151 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-1)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference : No. 150/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area of M/s BCCL,

AND

Their workman

Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer.

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2759

Appearances:

For the Employers:- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated : 25/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-I) dated 06/07/1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Union to refer to Medical Board for determination of date of birth of Shri

Kapildeb Sharma, Night Guard under 1.1.76 (JBCCI) is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is

entitled and from what date?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. So, it appears that the workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No dispute" award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 684-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 204@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@394@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 204 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in srelation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 204/1999

Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand Industry- Coal Dated- 27/03/ 20192760 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Union from the management of Gopalichuk Colliery of M/S BCCL to

regularize Sri Ram Chet Beldar as an office clerk is proper and justified? If yes to what relief the

workman is entitled and from what date?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 685-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch- lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 206@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@371@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 206 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 206/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- None

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 26/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2761

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area No.III of M/S BCCL Dhanbad to deny

regularization of Sri Ram Karan Mistry Block IV as lamp issue clerk is just and proper ? If not to what

relief the workman is entitled?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 686-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch- lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 207@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@373@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh&1½]

,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 207 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.

[No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 207/1999

Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL

AND

Their workman.

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers :- Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate

For the workman. :- None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 25/03/2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of South Govindpur Colliery of Area No.III M/S BCCL

Dhanbad to deny regularization of Sri Jailal Mahato as underground munshi in clerical Gr.II with

protection of wages is just and proper? If not to what relief Shri Jailal Mahato is entitled?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer2762 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 687-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 208@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@333@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 687.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 208/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 208/2001

Employer in relation to the management of Barora.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present: Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 28/03/2019 AWARD

By order No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I) dated 21/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the National coal workers congress of BCCL, Barora Area-1 to promote/

regularize Sri Kashi Nath Gour as Exv. Gr.D in 01.01.92 to Gr.C in 01.01.97 and in Gr.B 01.01.2001

with payment of arrear salary is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled ?

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Shri S.C.Gour who had received the notice on behalf of workman has informed that workman is not interested in contesting the case. Now the case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 688-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 205@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FksA

[la- ,y&20012@145@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2763

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 688.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 205/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 205/2001

Employer in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Sing, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal

Dated-26/03/2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the Demand of Colliery Karmchari Sangh from the management of Jealgora Colliery of

M/S. BCCL that Sri Shiv Shankar Singh is to be promote in Techinical Grade 'C' in Asstt.

Foreman(Auto) is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief is entitled the claimant entitled and which

date?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 689-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA

[la- ,y&20012@11@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 689.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 203 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer2764 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 203/2001

Employer in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer

Appearances:

For the Employers : Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal

Dated- 25/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of BCCL North Tisra Colliery for

regularizing Sri Yamuna Tiwari in Techinical Grade "C" from 1991 is justified? If so to what relief is

the workman entitled and from what date?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Notice were issued but even then none appeared on behalf of the workman. More over one of the notices returned with endorsement " Not Known". The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K.SINGH, Presiding Officer

ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019

dk-vk- 690-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA

[la- ,y&20012@390@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]

,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019

S.O. 690.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 203/1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.

[No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I)]

M. K. SINGH, Section Officer

ANNEXURE

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD

In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.

Reference: No. 203/1999

Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL

AND

Their workman

Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2765

Appearances:

For the Employers : None

For the workman. : None

State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal

Dated- 28/03/ 2019

AWARD

By order No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the demand of the Union before the management of Gopalichuk Colliery under P.B.Area of

M/S BCCL to regularize S/Sri Raj Ballabh Paswan and Madan Kumar Sinha as Attendance clerk is

proper and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workman are entitled and from what date?"

2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since 13.12.1999. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.

D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer

Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

Cite this issue. Weekly Gazette of India, Government of India, 04 May 2019. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.central.w.2019-05-04.203811/. Archive identifier in.gazette.central.w.2019-05-04.203811.