रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 18] नई दिल्ली, अप्रैल 28—मई 4, 2019, शनिवार/वैशाख 8—वैशाख 14, 1941
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
का(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मकका(cid:3)मक,,,, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयलोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय
(का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग) (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिक्षण विभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 25 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका.आ. .आ. .आ. .आ. 648648648648....————के न्(cid:13) सरकार एतदद्वारा दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना अिधिनयम, 1946 (1946 का अधिनियम संख्या 25) की धारा 6 के साथ पठित धारा 5 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए तमिलनाडू राज्य सरकार गृह (पुिलस XIII) विभाग के शासकीय आदेश (Ms). सं. 174 दिनांक 16.03.2019 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सहमित से भारतीय दंड संिहता (1860 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. XLV) की धारा 354-ए, 354-बी तथा 392 व सूचना प्रौद्योगिकी अधिनियम, 2000, (2000 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. 21) की धारा 66-ई तथा तमिलनाडू महिला उत्पीड़न निषेध अधिनियम, 1998 (1998 का तमिलनाडू अधिनियम 44) अपराध संख्या 59/2019 तथा भारतीय दंड संहिता (1860 का के न्(cid:13)ीय अधिनियम सं. XLV) की धारा 341, 294 (बी), 323, 324 एवं 506 भाग-2 के अंतर्गत, अपराध संख्या 60/2019 में जिला कोयम्बटूर, पोलाची पूर्वी पुलिस थाना में दर्ज मामले की जांच करने के लिए दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना के सदस्यों की शक्तियों और क्षेत्राधिकार का समस्त तमिलनाडू राज्य में विस्तार करती है ।
[फा. सं. 228/06/2019–एवीडी-II]
एस.पी.आर. त्रिपाठी, अवर सिचव
2204 GI/2019
(2565)
2566 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 25th April, 2019
S.O. 648.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of State Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police XIII) Department, vide Government Order G.O.(Ms).No. 174 dated 16.03.2019, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Tamil Nadu to investigate the case registered in Coimbatore District, Pollachi East Police Station Crime No.59/2019 under sections 354-A, 354-B and 392 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860) and section 66-E of Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) and section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 44 of 1998) and Crime No.60/2019 under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 Part 2 of Indian Penal Code (Central Act XLV of 1860).
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
विद्युतविद्युतविद्युतविद्युत मंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालयमंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 8 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 649649649649....————कें (cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के िलए प्रयोग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप- िनयम (4) के अनुसरण में विद्युत मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन पावरRिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड के निम्निलिखत कार्यालयों िजनके 80 प्रतिशत कर्मचारीवृ ंद ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, को एतदद्वारा अिधसूिचत करती है:-
1. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
400/220 के वी पावगड़ा उपकें (cid:13),
क्यातंग-चेलू र् गांव, वेंकटमनाहल्ली-पोस्ट,
पावगड़ा, जिला तुमकू र, कर्नाटक-572136
2. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
765/400/220 के वी उपकें (cid:13),
वसंतनरसापुरा इंडस्ट्रियल एरिया-2 व 3,
कें पनाडो[ेरी (पोस्ट), कोराहोब्ली,
तुमकू र तालुक व जिला, कर्नाटक-572128
3. पावर Rिड कारपोरेशन ऑफ इंिडया िलिमटेड,
कु डगी 765/400 के वी जीआईएस उपकें (cid:13),
बीजापुर-अलमाटी राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग-50 का 275 किमी स्टोन,
बसवनबागेवाड़ी तालुक, बीजापुर-586121
[सं. 11011/9/2017-हिदी]
राज पाल, आ_थक सलाहकार
MINISTRY OF POWER
New Delhi, the 8th April, 2019
S.O. 649.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notify the following offices of the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, where 80% of the staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi:
1. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., 400/220 KV Pavagada sub-station, Kyatagancherlu Village, Venkatamanahalli-Post, Pavagada-Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka -572136[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2567 2. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
765/400/220 KV Substation, Vasantanarsapura Industrial Area-2 & 3, Kempanadodderi (post), Kora hobli, Tumkur (TQ and Dt), Karnataka-572128
3. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.,
Kudgi 765/400 KV GIS Substation, 275 km stone on Bijapur-Almati NH-50, Basavanbagewadi Taluk, Bijapur-586121
[No.11011/9/2017-Hindi]
RAJ PAL, Economic Adviser
पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 3 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 650650650650....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पaात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया हैं) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1373 तारीख 5 सितम्बर 2018 जो भारत के राजपत्र,,,, प्रकाशित की गई थी द्वारा उस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट भूमि में महाराष्ट्र राज्य में जिला नासिक में तालुका मालेगांव कोयली - अहमदनगर - सोलापुर पेट्रोलियम परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाईन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ;;;;
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिनियम की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 01 दिसम्बर, 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी ;;;;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट की है ;;;;
और के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने, , , , उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पaात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है, , , , उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिaय किया है ;;;;
अतः अब, , , , के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रlत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाईन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए ;;;;
और सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उप-धारा (4) द्वारा प्रlत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए, , , , यह निदmश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग का अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए, , , , सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी ।
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाईन अधिनियम, 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपू_त के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाइपलाईन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार के विop कोई वाद दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहq हो सके गी।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| तालुका तालुका ----मालेगां तालुका तालुका मालेगांवववव मालेगां मालेगां | िजला िजला ---- नािसक िजला िजला नािसक | राज्य राज्य ---- महाराष्ट्र राज्य राज्य महाराष्ट्र | |||
| मौजे/$ाम | सव%/ब्लॉक/सं (प्लॉट सं) | सबसबसबसब----िडव िडव----संसंसंसं िडविडव | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | आरआरआरआर | वर्ग मीटर | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| जलगांव (निबयती) | 87 86 82 84 81 80 79 74 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 21 28 46 04 11 52 34 31 | 39 14 16 33 38 80 51 48 | |
| 72 65 590 591 589 593 595 599 598 597 579 578 552 553 559 558 520 519 517 516 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 24 26 11 03 29 25 12 07 21 34 41 22 49 34 09 08 08 51 32 15 | 63 81 34 68 73 16 11 18 09 16 21 23 11 58 22 18 37 33 81 89 |
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/6/2018-ओ-आर-I/ई-23678]
शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 3rd April, 2019
S. O. 650.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas vide S.O. No. 1373 dated the 5th September, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying Koyali-Ahmednagar-Solapur Pipeline for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Taluka Malegaon in Nashik District in the State of Maharashtra by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 01st December 2018;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of said act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2569Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
| Taluka:- Malegaon | District:- Nashik | State :- Maharashtra | |||
| Mauje / Village | Survey/ Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Jalgaon (Nimbait) | 87 86 82 84 81 80 79 74 72 65 590 591 589 593 595 599 598 597 579 578 552 553 559 558 520 519 517 516 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 21 28 46 04 11 52 34 31 24 26 11 03 29 25 12 07 21 34 41 22 49 34 09 08 08 51 32 15 | 39 14 16 33 38 80 51 48 63 81 34 68 73 16 11 18 09 16 21 23 11 58 22 18 37 33 81 89 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/6/2018-OR-I/E-23678]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 22 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 651651651651....————पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भू-उपयोग अधिकार अधिRहण) अधिनियम 1962 (1962 के 50) के खrड 2 की धारा(क) के अनुसरण में तथा पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय में भारत सरकार की दिनांक 21-5-2012 की अधिसूचना का॰आ॰1781 का अधिsमण करते -ए, कें (cid:13) सरकार एतtारा ,डीप्टी जिला कलेक्टर (नजफ़गढ़), राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली को अपने कर्तuों के अतिरिक्त राष्ट्रीय राजधानी क्षेत्र दिल्ली की सीमा मे हिन्दुस्तान पेट्रोलियम कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड की एमडीपीएल उत्पाद पाइपलाइन के अंग के रूप में बहादुरगढ़ – टिकरिकलां स्परलाइंस के लिए उक्त अधिनियम के तहत सक्षम प्राधिकारी के रूप में कार्य करने के लिए प्राधिकृ त करती है ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(15)/2/2019-ओआर-I/ई-29584]
शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव2570 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 22nd April, 2019
S. O. 651.—In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) and in suppression of notification of the Government of India in Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas No. S.O. 1781 dated 21-05-2012, the Central Government hereby authorizes, SDM (Najafgarh) Government of NCT Delhi, to perform the functions of Competent Authority for Bahadurgarh Tikrikalan spurlines as part of MDPL product Pipeline of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited in addition to his/her own duties, under the said Act, within the territory of NCT Delhi.
[F. No. R-11025(15)/2/2019-OR-I/E-29584]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 23 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका.आ. .आ. .आ. .आ. 652652652652....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपsमों के निम्निलिखत कार्यालयों को, िजनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है:-
1. भारत पेट्रोलियम कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, रायपुर, एल.पी.जी. बॉटलिग प्लांट, Rाम – खपरी,
तहसील - तिल्दा, िजला – रायपुर,
िपन – 493116
[सं. 11011/1/2017(हिन्दी)]
ऊषा बिन्जोला, संयुक्त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O. 652.—In pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more per cent of the staff have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-
1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Raipur LPG Bottling Plant, Village - Khapari, Tahsil – Tilda, District – Raipur, PIN - 493116
[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]
USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 23 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 653653653653....————के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय के प्रशासनिक नियंत्रणाधीन सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के उपsमों के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, िजनके 80 या अधिक प्रतिशत कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Uान प्राप्त कर िलया है, अिधसूिचत करती है :-
| s.सं. | कार्यालय/लोके शन का नाम |
| 1. | तलोजा ल्यूब कॉम्प्लेक्स इ ंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, विशेषता ल्यूब और योजक परिसर, प्लॉट सं. टी – 20, एमआईडीसी, तलोजा नवी मु ंबई – 410208 (महाराष्ट्र) |
| 2. | वडोदरा एलपीजी ट_मनल, इ ंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड, वडोदरा – सावली रोड, पोस्ट – दुमाड, वडोदरा – 391749 |
3. मु ंबई मrडल कार्यालय,
इंडियन ऑयल कॉपiरेशन लिमिटेड,
सार्जन प्लाज़ा,
100, डा. एनी बेसंट रोड, वर्ली,
मु ंबई – 400018
[सं. 11011/1/2017 (हिन्दी)]
ऊषा बिन्जोला, संयुक् त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O. 653.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for official purpose of the Unoin) Rules, 1976, the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Public Sector Undertakings under the administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, in which 80 or more percent of the staff have acquired working Knowledge of Hindi :-
| Sl. No. | Name of Office/Location |
| 1. | Taloja Lube Complex Indian Oil Corporation Limited Visheshata Lube aur Yojak Parisar, Plot No. T-20, MIDC, Taloja Navi Mumbai – 410208 (Maharashtra) |
| 2. | Vadodara LPG Terminal, Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vadodara Sawali Road, Post – Dumad, Vadodara-391749 |
| 3. | Mumbai Circle Office, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Sarzan Plaza, 100, Dr. Ani Besent Road, Worli, Mumbai - 400018 |
[No. 11011/1/2017(Hindi)]
USHA BINJOLA, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 654654654654....————पेट्रोलियम एवं खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन)अधिनियम, 1962, (1962 का 50) (इसमें इसके बाद उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 2 के खंड (क) के अनुसरण में, भारत के असाधारण राजपत्र संख्या 370, दिनांक 13.02.2017 में प्रकाशित, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना का. आ. संख्या 406 (अ), दिनांक 08.02.2017 में, भारत सरकार एतदद्वारा, संशोधन करती है तथा आंy प्रदेश राज्य में इंडियन ऑयल कॉरपोरेशन लिमिटेड की पारादीप हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना के लिए पेट्रोलियम एवं खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम, 1962 के तहत zी बी. वेंकटेशु को zी एम. आर.आर. शेषु के स्थान पर सक्षम प्राधिकारी के काय{ का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृ त करती है।
यह अधिसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से लागू होगी ।
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)/252/2017-ओआर-I/ई-21033]
शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S. O. 654.—In pursuance of clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 ( 50 of 1962), (hereinafter called the said Act), Government hereby, makes the amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. S.O. No 406 (E) dated 08.02.2017, published in the Extra Ordinary Gazette of India No. 370 dated 13.02.2017 and authorizes Shri B. Venkatesu vice Shri M.R.R. Seshu to perform the functions of Competent Authority under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user in Land) Act, 1962 for Paradip Hyderabad Pipeline Project of Indian Oil Corporation Limited in the state of Andhra Pradesh.
This notification is applicable from the date of issue.
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
2572 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]कोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालयकोयला मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 26 अप्रैल, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. 655. 655. 655. 655....—के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) ( जिसे इसमें इसके पaात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 1704(अ), तारीख 10 मई, 2016 , जो भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप -खंड (ii), तारीख 11 मई, 201 6 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से उपाबp अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 912.7892 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.502 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवmक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी और उक्त सूचना 10 मई, 2018 से प्रारंभ होने वाली एक वर्ष की और अवधि को, अधिसूचना संख्या 1651(अ), तारीख 17 अप्रैल,2018 में अधिसूचित की गई थी ;
और, के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलd अनुसूची में विहित उक्त भूमि के भाग से कोयला अभिप्राप्य किया जा सकता है ।
अत:, अब, के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 7 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते -ए, इससे संलd अनुसूची में विनिeदष्ट 912.799 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 1111 : : : : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1, तारीख 28 दिसम्बर, 2018 का निरीक्षण महा प्रबंधक, नैनी क्षेत्र, दि सिगरेनी कोलियरीज़ कं पनी लिमिटेड (एक सरकारी कं पनी), एनएसी का एच. संख्या 129, मिzापाड़ा, िजला अंगुल-759122, ओडिशा या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700001 के कार्यालय में या कलेक्टर और जिला मजिस्ट्रेट, िजला अंगुल, ओडिशा के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 2 :2 :2 :2 : उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृ ष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें अर्जन की आपत्तियों के संबंध में निम्नलिखित उपबंध है :-
''8. )1 ( कोई uक्ति, जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत धारा 7 के अधीन अधिसूचना जारी की गई है, हितबp है, अिधसूचना जारी किए जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हq अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के संबंध में आपत्ति कर सके गा ।
स्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरणस्पष्टीकरण....---- इस धारा के अथा(cid:127)तर्गत यह आपत्ति नहq मानी जाएगी, कि कोई uक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संsियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संsियाएं के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार या किसी अन्य uक्ति को नहq करनी चाहिए ।
(2) उप-धारा (1) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम अधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम अधिकारी, आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने का या विधि uवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पaात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदि कोई हो, करने के पaात् , जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोट(cid:127) के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार को उसके विनिaय के लिए देगा ।
(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह uक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबp समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार होता, यदि भूमि या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अ_जत कर लिए जाते ।''
टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण टिप्पण 3333 : : : : के न्(cid:13)ीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 3347(अ), तारीख 9 दिसम्बर, 2015, जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग ।।, खंड 3, उप -खंड (ii), में 10 दिसम्बर, 2015 को प्रकाशित की गयी थी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2573अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
सिसिसिसिगरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड गरेनी कोिलयरीज़ कं पनी िलिमटेड
नैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजनानैनी ओपनकास्ट परियोजना, , , , नैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्रनैनी क्षेत्र
िजला अंगुलिजला अंगुलिजला अंगुलिजला अंगुल, , , , ओिडशा ओिडशा ओिडशा ओिडशा
[[[[रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक रेखांक संख्यांक एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1एससीसीएल/नैनी क्षेत्र /अधिसूचना/2018/1,,,,तारीख तारीख तारीख तारीख 22228888 दिसम्बरदिसम्बरदिसम्बरदिसम्बर, , , , 2012012012018 8 8 8 ] ] ] ]
(I)(I)(I)(I) सारणी सारणी सारणी सारणी
| .सं. | ाम का नाम | थाना | थाना संख्या | िजला | भूमि का प्रकार (हेक्टेयर में) | जोड़, हेक्टेयर में | जोड़, एकड़ में | टिप्पणियां | ||
| अिभधृित | वन | गैर-वन सरकारी | ||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
| 1 | कासीडीहा | छ ेंदीपादा | 95 | अंगुल | 0.961 | 9.805 | 0.750 | 11.516 | 28.457 | भाग |
| 2 | तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर | छ ेंदीपादा | 94 | अंगुल | - | 1.461 | 0.654 | 2.115 | 5.226 | भाग |
| 3 | थलीपसी | छ ेंदीपादा | 101 | अंगुल | 20.555 | 4.207 | 3.052 | 27.814 | 68.730 | भाग |
| 4 | बिम्बाधारापुर | छ ेंदीपादा | 102 | अंगुल | 35.724 | 51.101 | 8.873 | 95.698 | 236.475 | पूर्ण |
| 5 | क ु डापासी | छ ेंदीपादा | 103 | अंगुल | 42.488 | 56.744 | 1.716 | 100.948 | 249.448 | भाग |
| 6 | धौराखमान | छ ेंदीपादा | 104 | अंगुल | 12.099 | 16.862 | 2.652 | 31.613 | 78.117 | भाग |
| 7 | छ ेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन | छ ेंदीपादा | - | अंगुल | 0.000 | 643.095 | 0.000 | 643.095 | 1589.122 | भाग |
| जोड़ : | 111.827 | 783.275 | 17.697 | 912.799 | 2255.575 | |||||
| जोड़ : 912.799 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 2255.575 एकड़ (लगभग ) |
1. Rाम कासीडीहा में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:
1 से 16, 17(भाग), 20(भाग), 23(भाग), 24(भाग), 25 से 29, 30(भाग), 31, 32(भाग), 33(भाग), 34(भाग), 36(भाग), 3092(भाग), 3138, 3176.
2. Rाम तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्याक:
193(भाग), 194(भाग), 195(भाग), 196 से 199, 200(भाग), 201(भाग).
3. Rाम थलीपसी में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:
1 से 17, 18(भाग), 19(भाग), 20(भाग), 52(भाग), 53 से 62, 63(भाग), 64(भाग), 66(भाग), 67, 68(भाग), 69 से 118, 119(भाग), 120(भाग), 229(भाग), 233(भाग), 234(भाग), 235, 236, 237(भाग), 238(भाग), 239, 240, 241(भाग), 242(भाग), 243, 244, 245(भाग), 247(भाग), 250(भाग), 251 से 431, 432(भाग), 433(भाग), 434(भाग), 436(भाग), 437(भाग), 449(भाग), 471(भाग), 472(भाग), 473, 474, 475, 476(भाग), 477 से 545, 546(भाग), 547(भाग), 548(भाग), 549, 550(भाग), 551(भाग), 552(भाग), 553(भाग), 561(भाग), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.
4. Rाम बिम्बाधारापुर में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लॉट संख्यांक:
1 से 437.
5. Rाम कु डापासी में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:
1 से 460, 461(भाग), 462(भाग), 463 से 466, 467(भाग), 492(भाग), 499(भाग), 500(भाग), 501 से 522, 523(भाग), 527(भाग), 528, 529(भाग), 530(भाग), 531(भाग), 532 से 630, 631(भाग), 632(भाग), 633(भाग), 634(भाग), 635(भाग), 636 से 677, 678(भाग), 679(भाग), 680(भाग), 681(भाग), 682(भाग), 685(भाग), 686(भाग), 687(भाग), 688, 689(भाग), 690, 691(भाग), 692(भाग), 737(भाग), 738, 739, 740, 741(भाग), 769(भाग), 770 से 783, 784(भाग), 795(भाग), 796(भाग), 797(भाग), 802(भाग), 803(भाग), 804, 805, 806, 807(भाग), 809(भाग), 955(भाग), 956(भाग), 1223, 1224(भाग), 1225 से 1231, 1233 से 1297, 1300 से 1311, 1314, 1316 से 1322, 1324 से 1331, 1333 से 1363.
2574 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]6. Rाम धराखमान में अ_जत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक:
1 से 19, 20(भाग), 21(भाग), 22 से 52, 53(भाग), 54(भाग), 84(भाग), 85(भाग), 86 से 101, 102(भाग), 103, 104, 105(भाग), 176(भाग), 178(भाग), 179(भाग), 180(भाग), 181(भाग), 182 से 212, 213(भाग), 214 से 221, 222(भाग), 223(भाग), 224(भाग), 225(भाग), 226(भाग), 255(भाग), 256(भाग), 257(भाग), 258, 259, 260(भाग), 261, 262(भाग), 265(भाग), 266(भाग), 267, 268(भाग), 269(भाग), 270(भाग), 550 से 553, 558 से 563, 566, 567, 570 से 572, 574, 575, 578 से 582, 584, 587 से 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.
(7) (7) (7) (7) छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन: 643.095 हेक्टेयर या 643.095 एकड़
अ_जत की जाने वाली भूमि का विवरण नीचे सारणी में दिया गया है:-
(II)(II)(II)(II) सारणीसारणीसारणीसारणी
(1) Rाम – कासीडीहा
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
| s.सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | कासीडीहा | 44 | 3 | चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य | तैला | 0.136 |
| 2 | कासीडीहा | 73 | 4 | दसारथी सा- सुपुत्र पदमलवा सा- व अन्य | तैला | 0.176 |
| 3 | कासीडीहा | 167 | 5 | महेश् वर सा- सुपुत्र दसारथी सा- व अन्य | तैला | 0.201 |
| 4 | कासीडीहा | 44 | 9 | चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य | पतीता | 0.090 |
| 5 | कासीडीहा | 44 | 10 | चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य | पतीता | 0.041 |
| 6 | कासीडीहा | 44 | 11 | चौधुरी प्रधान सुपुत्र लखई प्रधान व अन्य | पतीता | 0.317 |
| जोड़जोड़जोड़जोड़ : : : : | $ाम $ाम : : : : कासीडीहा $ाम $ाम कासीडीहा | 0.961 |
(2) Rाम – थलीपसी
गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी)
| s.सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | थलीपसी | 8 | 2 | िखरमोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.607 |
| 2 | थलीपसी | 46/5 | 3 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिष्णु चरण सा | तैला | 0.133 |
| 3 | थलीपसी | 45 | 4 | सुदर्शन नायक सुपुत्र दिबाकर और अन्य | पतीता | 0.061 |
| 4 | थलीपसी | 45 | 5 | सुदर्शन नायक सुपुत्र दिबाकर और अन्य | तैला | 0.178 |
| 5 | थलीपसी | 21 | 6 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.101 |
| 6 | थलीपसी | 21 | 7 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.174 |
| 7 | थलीपसी | 21 | 8 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.243 |
| 8 | थलीपसी | 21 | 9 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.174 |
| 9 | थलीपसी | 21 | 10 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.049 |
| 10 | थलीपसी | 43 | 12 | संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.118 |
| 11 | थलीपसी | 43 | 13 | संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.510 |
| 12 | थलीपसी | 43 | 14 | संतकु मार सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.049 |
| 13 | थलीपसी | 14 | 15 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.542 |
| 14 | थलीपसी | 14 | 16 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.257 |
| 15 | थलीपसी | 14 | 17 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.047 |
| 16 | थलीपसी | 14 | 18 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.198 |
| 17 | थलीपसी | 14 | 19 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालव सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.003 |
| 18 | थलीपसी | 21 | 52 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.067 |
| 19 | थलीपसी | 21 | 53 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.105 |
| 20 | थलीपसी | 21 | 54 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.105 |
| 21 | थलीपसी | 21 | 55 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.032 |
| 22 | थलीपसी | 21 | 56 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 23 | थलीपसी | 21 | 57 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 24 | थलीपसी | 21 | 58 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 25 | थलीपसी | 21 | 59 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 26 | थलीपसी | 21 | 60 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.040 |
| 27 | थलीपसी | 21 | 61 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 28 | थलीपसी | 21 | 62 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 29 | थलीपसी | 21 | 63 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 30 | थलीपसी | 17 | 64 | डालगोबोंडा माझी सुपुत्र मौलमानी माझी | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.106 |
| 31 | थलीपसी | 7 | 66 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.028 |
| 32 | थलीपसी | 7 | 67 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.122 |
| 33 | थलीपसी | 7 | 68 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 34 | थलीपसी | 7 | 69 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.046 |
| 35 | थलीपसी | 7 | 70 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 36 | थलीपसी | 7 | 71 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.091 |
| 37 | थलीपसी | 7 | 72 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.054 |
| 38 | थलीपसी | 7 | 73 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.040 |
| 39 | थलीपसी | 13 | 74 | जोगी सा सुपुत्र बंछा सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.091 |
| 40 | थलीपसी | 7 | 75 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.178 |
| 41 | थलीपसी | 7 | 76 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र जोगई सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.091 |
| 42 | थलीपसी | 20 | 79 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.199 |
| 43 | थलीपसी | 20 | 80 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.059 |
| 44 | थलीपसी | 38 | 81 | बुधिया माझी सुपुत्र नाबागाना माझी | तैला | 0.221 |
| 45 | थलीपसी | 20 | 87 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.460 |
| 46 | थलीपसी | 20 | 88 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मैगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.053 |
| 47 | थलीपसी | 6 | 91 | कान् सा सुपुत्र आरता सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.040 |
| 48 | थलीपसी | 6 | 92 | कान् सा सुपुत्र आरता सा | तैला | 0.247 |
| 49 | थलीपसी | 27 | 95 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.353 |
| 50 | थलीपसी | 32 | 96 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य । | तैला | 0.412 |
| 51 | थलीपसी | 25 | 97 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.015 |
| 52 | थलीपसी | 25 | 98 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.012 |
| 53 | थलीपसी | 25 | 99 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 54 | थलीपसी | 25 | 100 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.025 |
| 55 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 101 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.072 |
| 56 | थलीपसी | 30 | 102 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.190 |
| 57 | थलीपसी | 33 | 103 | भागाबत गोसा सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.031 |
| 58 | थलीपसी | 46/4 | 105 | जसबंत प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगीनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | घाराबरी | 0.117 |
| 59 | थलीपसी | 9 | 106 | गिरिश चन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | घाराबरी | 0.119 |
| 60 | थलीपसी | 25 | 107 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | घाराबरी | 0.103 |
| 61 | थलीपसी | 44 | 108 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 62 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 109 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 63 | थलीपसी | 37 | 110 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 64 | थलीपसी | 30 | 111 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.158 |
| 65 | थलीपसी | 6 | 112 | कान सा सुपुत्र अराता सा | घाराबरी | 0.146 |
| 66 | थलीपसी | 22 | 115 | पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | घाराबरी | 0.087 |
| 67 | थलीपसी | 6 | 116 | कान सा सुपुत्र अराता सा | घाराबरी | 0.077 |
| 68 | थलीपसी | 21 | 117 | पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | घाराबरी | 0.102 |
| 69 | थलीपसी | 21 | 118 | पाडिया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | घाराबरी | 0.090 |
| 70 | थलीपसी | 25 | 233 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.002 |
| 71 | थलीपसी | 39 | 234 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारान प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.111 |
| 72 | थलीपसी | 39 | 235 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारान प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.104 |
| 73 | थलीपसी | 15 | 236 | दिबाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 74 | थलीपसी | 39 | 237 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.057 |
| 75 | थलीपसी | 39 | 238 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 76 | थलीपसी | 39 | 239 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.056 |
| 77 | थलीपसी | 39 | 240 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 78 | थलीपसी | 39 | 241 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 79 | थलीपसी | 39 | 242 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.013 |
| 80 | थलीपसी | 39 | 243 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 81 | थलीपसी | 39 | 244 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 82 | थलीपसी | 15 | 245 | दिबाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.003 |
| 83 | थलीपसी | 39 | 247 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.060 |
| 84 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 250 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 85 | थलीपसी | 25 | 251 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 86 | थलीपसी | 25 | 252 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 87 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 253 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 88 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 254 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.017 |
| 89 | थलीपसी | 44 | 255 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 90 | थलीपसी | 9 | 256 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 91 | थलीपसी | 9 | 257 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 92 | थलीपसी | 37 | 258 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 93 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 259 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 94 | थलीपसी | 25 | 260 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.018 |
| 95 | थलीपसी | 9 | 261 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.025 |
| 96 | थलीपसी | 25 | 262 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 97 | थलीपसी | 9 | 263 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 98 | थलीपसी | 25 | 264 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 99 | थलीपसी | 9 | 265 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 100 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 266 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 101 | थलीपसी | 44 | 267 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 102 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 268 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 103 | थलीपसी | 37 | 269 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.017 |
| 104 | थलीपसी | 44 | 270 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.014 |
| 105 | थलीपसी | 37 | 271 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 106 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 272 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.061 |
| 107 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 273 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 108 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 274 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.020 |
| 109 | थलीपसी | 9 | 275 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 110 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 276 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.050 |
| 111 | थलीपसी | 25 | 277 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.063 |
| 112 | थलीपसी | 9 | 278 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 113 | थलीपसी | 37 | 279 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 114 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 280 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 115 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 281 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 116 | थलीपसी | 37 | 282 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.070 |
| 117 | थलीपसी | 44 | 283 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.067 |
| 118 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 284 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 119 | थलीपसी | 37 | 285 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.014 |
| 120 | थलीपसी | 37 | 286 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 121 | थलीपसी | 9 | 287 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 122 | थलीपसी | 25 | 288 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 123 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 289 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 124 | थलीपसी | 37 | 290 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.053 |
| 125 | थलीपसी | 44 | 291 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 126 | थलीपसी | 44 | 292 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 127 | थलीपसी | 44 | 293 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 128 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 294 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.035 |
| 129 | थलीपसी | 44 | 295 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 130 | थलीपसी | 44 | 296 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 131 | थलीपसी | 37 | 297 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.088 |
| 132 | थलीपसी | 37 | 298 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.040 |
| 133 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 299 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 134 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 300 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 135 | थलीपसी | 44 | 301 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.075 |
| 136 | थलीपसी | 37 | 302 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.068 |
| 137 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 303 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.046 |
| 138 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 304 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 139 | थलीपसी | 44 | 305 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 140 | थलीपसी | 25 | 306 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 141 | थलीपसी | 25 | 307 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 142 | थलीपसी | 25 | 308 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 143 | थलीपसी | 25 | 309 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.058 |
| 144 | थलीपसी | 25 | 310 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 145 | थलीपसी | 25 | 311 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.046 |
| 146 | थलीपसी | 25 | 312 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.058 |
| 147 | थलीपसी | 25 | 313 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 148 | थलीपसी | 25 | 314 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 149 | थलीपसी | 25 | 315 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 150 | थलीपसी | 25 | 316 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 151 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 321 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.055 |
| 152 | थलीपसी | 9 | 322 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 153 | थलीपसी | 9 | 323 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.054 |
| 154 | थलीपसी | 9 | 324 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 155 | थलीपसी | 9 | 325 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.060 |
| 156 | थलीपसी | 9 | 326 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 157 | थलीपसी | 9 | 327 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.047 |
| 158 | थलीपसी | 9 | 328 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 159 | थलीपसी | 9 | 329 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 160 | थलीपसी | 9 | 330 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 161 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 331 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 162 | थलीपसी | 36 | 332 | बीरबर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 163 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 333 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.015 |
| 164 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 334 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 165 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 335 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 166 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 336 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 167 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 337 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 168 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 338 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.119 |
| 169 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 339 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.064 |
| 170 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 340 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 171 | थलीपसी | 37 | 341 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 172 | थलीपसी | 37 | 342 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.021 |
| 173 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 344 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.025 |
| 174 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 345 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.035 |
| 175 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 346 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.066 |
| 176 | थलीपसी | 37 | 347 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.102 |
| 177 | थलीपसी | 44 | 348 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 178 | थलीपसी | 44 | 349 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 179 | थलीपसी | 37 | 350 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.075 |
| 180 | थलीपसी | 37 | 351 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.076 |
| 181 | थलीपसी | 44 | 352 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.145 |
| 182 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 353 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.102 |
| 183 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 354 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.083 |
| 184 | थलीपसी | 37 | 355 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.076 |
| 185 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 356 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.032 |
| 186 | थलीपसी | 44 | 357 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 187 | थलीपसी | 44 | 358 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 188 | थलीपसी | 44 | 359 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 189 | थलीपसी | 37 | 360 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.018 |
| 190 | थलीपसी | 37 | 361 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 191 | थलीपसी | 37 | 362 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.035 |
| 192 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 363 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.063 |
| 193 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 364 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 194 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 365 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.056 |
| 195 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 367 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 196 | थलीपसी | 9 | 369 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.025 |
| 197 | थलीपसी | 9 | 370 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.020 |
| 198 | थलीपसी | 25 | 371 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 199 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 372 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.083 |
| 200 | थलीपसी | 25 | 373 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.040 |
| 201 | थलीपसी | 9 | 374 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 202 | थलीपसी | 9 | 375 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 203 | थलीपसी | 25 | 376 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.012 |
| 204 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 377 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 205 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 378 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 206 | थलीपसी | 25 | 379 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 207 | थलीपसी | 9 | 380 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 208 | थलीपसी | 9 | 381 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 209 | थलीपसी | 25 | 382 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 210 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 383 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 211 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 384 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 212 | थलीपसी | 25 | 385 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 213 | थलीपसी | 9 | 386 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 214 | थलीपसी | 9 | 387 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 215 | थलीपसी | 25 | 388 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 216 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 389 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.021 |
| 217 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 390 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 218 | थलीपसी | 25 | 391 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 219 | थलीपसी | 9 | 392 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 220 | थलीपसी | 9 | 393 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 221 | थलीपसी | 25 | 394 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 222 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 395 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 223 | थलीपसी | 46/3 | 396 | जसोबंता प्रधान सुपुत्र जोगेर प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 224 | थलीपसी | 25 | 397 | प्रभाकर प्रधान सुपुत्र मधुसुदन प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.032 |
| 225 | थलीपसी | 9 | 398 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 226 | थलीपसी | 9 | 399 | गिरिश चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र पुरेन् प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.013 |
| 227 | थलीपसी | 37 | 400 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 228 | थलीपसी | 37 | 401 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.106 |
| 229 | थलीपसी | 44 | 402 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.064 |
| 230 | थलीपसी | 44 | 403 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.046 |
| 231 | थलीपसी | 44 | 404 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.047 |
| 232 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 405 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.096 |
| 233 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 406 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.078 |
| 234 | थलीपसी | 44 | 407 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.083 |
| 235 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 408 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.108 |
| 236 | थलीपसी | 37 | 409 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.111 |
| 237 | थलीपसी | 37 | 410 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.100 |
| 238 | थलीपसी | 46/6 | 411 | चन् शेखर प्रधान सुपुत्र चौधरी प्रधान व अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.105 |
| 239 | थलीपसी | 44 | 412 | सुदर्शन प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.088 |
| 240 | थलीपसी | 37 | 413 | बिनाथ प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.118 |
| 241 | थलीपसी | 14 | 417 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.128 |
| 242 | थलीपसी | 14 | 421 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 243 | थलीपसी | 14 | 422 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 244 | थलीपसी | 14 | 423 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.090 |
| 245 | थलीपसी | 14 | 424 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | जलाश्य एक | 0.014 |
| 246 | थलीपसी | 14 | 425 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | घारीबारी | 0.086 |
| 247 | थलीपसी | 14 | 426 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 248 | थलीपसी | 14 | 427 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.054 |
| 249 | थलीपसी | 14 | 428 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 250 | थलीपसी | 14 | 429 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.020 |
| 251 | थलीपसी | 14 | 430 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.017 |
| 252 | थलीपसी | 14 | 431 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.076 |
| 253 | थलीपसी | 14 | 432 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 254 | थलीपसी | 14 | 433 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 255 | थलीपसी | 14 | 434 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 256 | थलीपसी | 14 | 436 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.001 |
| 257 | थलीपसी | 14 | 437 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.005 |
| 258 | थलीपसी | 14 | 472 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.009 |
| 259 | थलीपसी | 14 | 473 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 260 | थलीपसी | 14 | 474 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.006 |
| 261 | थलीपसी | 14 | 475 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 262 | थलीपसी | 14 | 476 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.012 |
| 263 | थलीपसी | 14 | 477 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 264 | थलीपसी | 14 | 478 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.013 |
| 265 | थलीपसी | 14 | 479 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 266 | थलीपसी | 14 | 480 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 267 | थलीपसी | 14 | 481 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.021 |
| 268 | थलीपसी | 14 | 482 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 269 | थलीपसी | 14 | 483 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमालवो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.056 |
| 270 | थलीपसी | 18 | 495 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 271 | थलीपसी | 46/10 | 500 | दिगम्बर सा सुपुत्र रतनाकर सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.047 |
| 272 | थलीपसी | 2 | 501 | उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 273 | थलीपसी | 3 | 502 | कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 274 | थलीपसी | 42 | 503 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.055 |
| 275 | थलीपसी | 3 | 510 | कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.126 |
| 276 | थलीपसी | 2 | 511 | उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.111 |
| 277 | थलीपसी | 42 | 512 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.062 |
| 278 | थलीपसी | 40 | 513 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 279 | थलीपसी | 23 | 514 | प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 280 | थलीपसी | 3 | 515 | कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.063 |
| 281 | थलीपसी | 2 | 516 | उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 282 | थलीपसी | 12 | 522 | गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.190 |
| 283 | थलीपसी | 18 | 523 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.080 |
| 284 | थलीपसी | 18 | 524 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.086 |
| 285 | थलीपसी | 18 | 525 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.088 |
| 286 | थलीपसी | 18 | 526 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.050 |
| 287 | थलीपसी | 18 | 527 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.058 |
| 288 | थलीपसी | 12 | 528 | नंदकिशोर सा सुपुत्र श्याम सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.080 |
| 289 | थलीपसी | 23 | 529 | प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 290 | थलीपसी | 40 | 530 | मदन सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 291 | थलीपसी | 3 | 531 | कामरा सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.040 |
| 292 | थलीपसी | 2 | 532 | उछाब सा सुपुत्र कल्याण सा | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 293 | थलीपसी | 11 | 533 | गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.024 |
| 294 | थलीपसी | 11 | 534 | गोबर्धन सा सुपुत्र आनंदी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 295 | थलीपसी | 24 | 535 | प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -र सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 296 | थलीपसी | 24 | 536 | प्रकाश सा सुपुत्र कु -र सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 297 | थलीपसी | 10 | 539 | गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.070 |
| 298 | थलीपसी | 10 | 540 | गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.051 |
| 299 | थलीपसी | 10 | 543 | गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.169 |
| 300 | थलीपसी | 10 | 544 | गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.171 |
| 301 | थलीपसी | 10 | 548 | गुजी प्रधान सुपुत्र पानू प्रधान और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.044 |
| 302 | थलीपसी | 14 | 549 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमावलो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.050 |
| 303 | थलीपसी | 20 | 550 | नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.018 |
| 304 | थलीपसी | 14 | 551 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमलावो सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.096 |
| 305 | थलीपसी | 20 | 552 | नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.036 |
| 306 | थलीपसी | 20 | 553 | नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.015 |
| 307 | थलीपसी | 14 | 561 | दशरथी सा सुपुत्र पदमलावो सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता दो फसली | 0.001 |
| 308 | थलीपसी | 20 | 569 | नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सरदा जालसाचीता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 309 | थलीपसी | 20 | 570 | नूरा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.216 |
| 310 | थलीपसी | 46/5 | 576 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.487 |
| 311 | थलीपसी | 46/5 | 577 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.140 |
| 312 | थलीपसी | 46/5 | 578 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | पतीता | 0.013 |
| 313 | थलीपसी | 30 | 579 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | घाराबारी | 0.132 |
| 314 | थलीपसी | 30 | 580 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र जदुनाथ प्रधान और अन्य | घाराबारी | 0.121 |
| 315 | थलीपसी | 46/7 | 581 | मनोज कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान | तैला | 0.028 |
| 316 | थलीपसी | 46/8 | 582 | क ु मुदा प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान | तैला | 0.046 |
| 317 | थलीपसी | 46/9 | 583 | छबीला कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र बालूके र प्रधान | तैला | 0.039 |
| जोड़ : | 20.555 | |||||
| (3) Rाम – बिम्बाधारापुर गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) | ||||||
| s.सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 6 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 1.150 |
| 2 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 16 | 7 | िनसामिण सडांगी पत् नी बालकृ ष्ण सडांगी | तैला | 0.387 |
| 3 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 16 | 8 | िनसामिण सडांगी पत् नी बालकृ ष्ण सडांगी | तैला | 0.419 |
| 4 | िबम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 12 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.147 |
| 5 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 13 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.157 |
| 6 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 14 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.456 |
| 7 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 15 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.132 |
| 8 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 29 | 16 | सरोज नायक सुपुत्र सरदार नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.104 |
| 9 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 18 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.274 |
| 10 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 20 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.226 |
| 11 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/5 | 21 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.146 |
| 12 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/34 | 22 | सिसिर कु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र कालिया बेहेरा | तैला | 0.139 |
| 13 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 10 | 23 | त्रिनाथ नायक सुपुत्र बेड़ा नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.056 |
| 14 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 7 | 29 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.113 |
| 15 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 7 | 30 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.232 |
| 16 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 27 | 31 | रा नायक सुपुत्र कालिया नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.584 |
| 17 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 20 | 32 | िबकाला बाघ सुपुत्र मुलई बाघ और अन्य | तैला | 0.505 |
| 18 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/9 | 33 | उमा नायक पी कल्याण नायक | तैला | 0.515 |
| 19 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 39 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 20 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 40 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 21 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 41 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 22 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 44 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 23 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 45 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 24 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 46 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.020 |
| 25 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 47 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.091 |
| 26 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 48 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 27 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 49 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.063 |
| 28 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 50 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.084 |
| 29 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 17 | 51 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिनहा सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.082 |
| 30 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 52 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.079 |
| 31 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 53 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.069 |
| 32 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 54 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.038 |
| 33 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 55 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 34 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 56 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 35 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 57 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा | सारदा | 0.032 |
| और अन्य | जलसािचता एक फसली | |||||
| 36 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 58 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.057 |
| 37 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 59 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 38 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 60 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहादेब प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.274 |
| 39 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 61 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.123 |
| 40 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 62 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.121 |
| 41 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/8 | 63 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.279 |
| 42 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 64 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.105 |
| 43 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 65 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.106 |
| 44 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 66 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.109 |
| 45 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 8 | 67 | जाडू प्रधान सुपुत्र आराखीता प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.401 |
| 46 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 1 | 78 | कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान | तैला | 0.079 |
| 47 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 1 | 80 | कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.130 |
| 48 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 1 | 81 | कपिल प्रधान सुपुत्र सुना प्रधान | तैला | 0.270 |
| 49 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 31 | 82 | zीनिबास नायक सुपुत्र बल्का नायक | तैला | 0.308 |
| 50 | िबम्बाधारापुर | 34/17 | 83 | सरोज कु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र रघुनाथ बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.220 |
| 51 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 7 | 84 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशतम नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.157 |
| 52 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/7 | 105 | सत्यनारायण सा सुपुत्र भाजामन सा | तैला | 0.342 |
| 53 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 14 | 106 | दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.119 |
| 54 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 14 | 107 | दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.180 |
| 55 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 14 | 108 | दुरजोधना सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.136 |
| 56 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 26 | 114 | महेर सा सुपुत्र दसरथी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.517 |
| 57 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 30 | 116 | सरांगाधर सा सुपुत्र बंगुरू सा | तैला | 0.294 |
| 58 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 9 | 121 | दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.288 |
| 59 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34 | 123 | हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य | तैला | 0.222 |
| 60 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34 | 128 | हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.220 |
| 61 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34 | 129 | हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 62 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34 | 130 | हरूदानंद दे-रे सुपुत्र काथी दे-रे और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 63 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 131 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.188 |
| 64 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 132 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | तैला | 0.163 |
| 65 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 133 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.064 |
| 66 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 134 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 67 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 135 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.071 |
| 68 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 136 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 69 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 5 | 137 | खिता बाघा सुपुत्र कै रू बाघा | तैला | 0.434 |
| 70 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 3 | 139 | किशोरी प्रधान सुपुत्र नाता प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.614 |
| 71 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 150 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.060 |
| 72 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 151 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.045 |
| 73 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 152 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.061 |
| 74 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 153 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.037 |
| 75 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 154 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.030 |
| 76 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 156 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.322 |
| 77 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 157 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.104 |
| 78 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 158 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.130 |
| 79 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 33 | 159 | हतुआ बेहेरा सुपुत्र मदन बेहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.160 |
| 80 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 19 | 160 | भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 1.238 |
| 81 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 166 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नाराना प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.726 |
| 82 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 168 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.095 |
| 83 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 169 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.085 |
| 84 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 173 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 85 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 174 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 86 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 175 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.099 |
| 87 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 176 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.124 |
| 88 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 177 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 89 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 178 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 90 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 179 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.018 |
| 91 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 180 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 92 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 181 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.026 |
| 93 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 25 | 182 | भाजी प्रधान सुपुत्र कनथिया प्रधान | तैला | 0.062 |
| 94 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 183 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.087 |
| 95 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 184 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.077 |
| 96 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 185 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान | तैला | 0.076 |
| 97 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 186 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.100 |
| 98 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 187 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.121 |
| 99 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 188 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.075 |
| 100 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 189 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.072 |
| 101 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 190 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.090 |
| 102 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 191 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.100 |
| 103 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 192 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.091 |
| 104 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 193 | भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.113 |
| 105 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 194 | भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.133 |
| 106 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 195 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान | तैला | 0.214 |
| 107 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 196 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नाराना प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.008 |
| 108 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 197 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 109 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 198 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.050 |
| 110 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 199 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.046 |
| 111 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 200 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.046 |
| 112 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 201 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 113 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 202 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 114 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 203 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.072 |
| 115 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 204 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 116 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 205 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 117 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 206 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.069 |
| 118 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 207 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 119 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 208 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 120 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 209 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 121 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 210 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 122 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 211 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.083 |
| 123 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 212 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 124 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 213 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.036 |
| 125 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 214 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 126 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 215 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 127 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 216 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 128 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 217 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 129 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 218 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 130 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 219 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.021 |
| 131 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 220 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 132 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 221 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 133 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 22 | 222 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.060 |
| 134 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 223 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 135 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 224 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 136 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 225 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.423 |
| 137 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 226 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 138 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 227 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 139 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 228 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.037 |
| 140 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 229 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.031 |
| 141 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 230 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 142 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 231 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंग प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 143 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 232 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 144 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 233 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 145 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 234 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 146 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 235 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.032 |
| 147 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 236 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.035 |
| 148 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 237 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.153 |
| 149 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 238 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 150 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 239 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 151 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 240 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 152 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 241 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.035 |
| 153 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 242 | भलभ प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.140 |
| 154 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 243 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.143 |
| 155 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 244 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.137 |
| 156 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 245 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.118 |
| 157 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 246 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.116 |
| 158 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 247 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.111 |
| 159 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 248 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.115 |
| 160 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 249 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.047 |
| 161 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 250 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.047 |
| 162 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 251 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 163 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 252 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.082 |
| 164 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 253 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.074 |
| 165 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 254 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.069 |
| 166 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 255 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर | सारदा | 0.111 |
| प्रधान और अन्य | जलसािचता एक फसली | |||||
| 167 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/21 | 256 | जनक दे-रे सुपुत्र मुलई दे-रे | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.120 |
| 168 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 257 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.249 |
| 169 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 258 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.059 |
| 170 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 259 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.015 |
| 171 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 260 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.009 |
| 172 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 261 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 173 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 262 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.018 |
| 174 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 263 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.053 |
| 175 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 264 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.041 |
| 176 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 265 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.227 |
| 177 | िबम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 266 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.087 |
| 178 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 267 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.101 |
| 179 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 268 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.115 |
| 180 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 269 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.105 |
| 181 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 270 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.070 |
| 182 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 271 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और | सारदा जलसािचता एक | 0.038 |
| अन्य | फसली | |||||
| 183 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 272 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.091 |
| 184 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 273 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.098 |
| 185 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 274 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.092 |
| 186 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 275 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.070 |
| 187 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 276 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.107 |
| 188 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 277 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.024 |
| 189 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 278 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.025 |
| 190 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 279 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 191 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 280 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.078 |
| 192 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 281 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 193 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 282 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 194 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 283 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.019 |
| 195 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 284 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.023 |
| 196 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 285 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.039 |
| 197 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 286 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.033 |
| 198 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 287 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 199 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 288 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.049 |
| 200 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 289 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 201 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 290 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 202 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 291 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.052 |
| 203 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 292 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 204 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 293 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.015 |
| 205 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 294 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.018 |
| 206 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 295 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 207 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 296 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.020 |
| 208 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 297 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.107 |
| 209 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 298 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.110 |
| 210 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 299 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.110 |
| 211 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 300 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.062 |
| 212 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 301 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.093 |
| 213 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 302 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.067 |
| 214 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 303 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.051 |
| 215 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 11 | 304 | त्रिपुरा प्रधान सुपुत्र जनका प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.160 |
| 216 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 305 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.035 |
| 217 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 306 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.129 |
| 218 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 307 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.165 |
| 219 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 308 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.159 |
| 220 | िबम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 309 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.158 |
| 221 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 312 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.049 |
| 222 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 313 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.056 |
| 223 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 314 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.040 |
| 224 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 315 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.045 |
| 225 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 316 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.040 |
| 226 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 317 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.043 |
| 227 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 318 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.041 |
| 228 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 319 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.026 |
| 229 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 320 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.057 |
| 230 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 321 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.037 |
| 231 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 322 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.037 |
| 232 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 323 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.039 |
| 233 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 324 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.081 |
| 234 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 325 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.078 |
| 235 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 326 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.070 |
| 236 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 327 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान । | तैला | 0.210 |
| 237 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 328 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.171 |
| 238 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 333 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान । | तैला | 0.161 |
| 239 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 334 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.123 |
| 240 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 335 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.056 |
| 241 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 336 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.119 |
| 242 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 337 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कन्धा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.179 |
| 243 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 338 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.171 |
| 244 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 339 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.114 |
| 245 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 340 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.086 |
| 246 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 341 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 247 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 342 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.028 |
| 248 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 343 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 249 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 344 | क ं दुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.022 |
| 250 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 345 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.044 |
| 251 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 346 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.034 |
| 252 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 347 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 253 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 348 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 254 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 349 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 255 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 350 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.029 |
| 256 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 6 | 351 | गोपालचन् ा प्रधान सुपुत्र बेनुधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.051 |
| 257 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 352 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.112 |
| 258 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 9 | 353 | दामबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नितयानंद प्रधान | तैला | 0.146 |
| 259 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 354 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 260 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 355 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.065 |
| 261 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 356 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.027 |
| 262 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 357 | बलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.076 |
| 263 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 358 | बैब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.071 |
| 264 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 23 | 359 | बैब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.099 |
| 265 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 9 | 360 | दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.013 |
| 266 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 9 | 361 | दमबुरू प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान | तैला | 0.049 |
| 267 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 15 | 366 | नाकोफोदी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहदेब प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.065 |
| 268 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 24 | 367 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.394 |
| 269 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 24 | 368 | बैशनब प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.022 |
| 270 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 369 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.277 |
| 271 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 370 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.079 |
| 272 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 371 | िखरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.066 |
| 273 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 4 | 372 | खिरामोहन सा सुपुत्र जोगेन् सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.158 |
| 274 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 377 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.172 |
| 275 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 378 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.203 |
| 276 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 21 | 379 | बीरा प्रधान सुपुत्र गौरंगा प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.048 |
| 277 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 18 | 381 | भलभ ा प्रधान सुपुत्र मगुनी प्रधान और अन् य | तैला | 0.403 |
| 278 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 2 | 382 | क ं धुर प्रधान सुपुत्र कं धा प्रधान और अन् य | तैला | 0.308 |
| 279 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/5 | 395 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.769 |
| 280 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/2 | 396 | भोलेश् वर सा सुपुत्र बगुरू सा | तैला | 0.362 |
| 281 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/4 | 397 | बीनोदिनी रैऊता पत् नी वैश् नब रैऊता | तैला | 0.320 |
| 282 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/6 | 398 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.345 |
| 283 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/8 | 399 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.240 |
| 284 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/11 | 401 | गंधरबा नायक सुपुत्र कु रतारथा नायक | तैला | 0.267 |
| 285 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/11 | 402 | गंधरबा नायकसुपुत्र कु रतारथा नायक | तैला | 0.151 |
| 286 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/12 | 403 | र ंजनकु मार बेहेरा सुपुत्र कं दारपा बेहेरा | तैला | 0.159 |
| 287 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 404 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.051 |
| 288 | िबम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 405 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.053 |
| 289 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 406 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.038 |
| 290 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 407 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.029 |
| 291 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 408 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.040 |
| 292 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 409 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | तैला | 0.081 |
| 293 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/10 | 410 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिश् नु चरण सा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.110 |
| 294 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/13 | 411 | अरूण कु मार नायक सुपुत्र हरिहारा नायक | तैला | 0.090 |
| 295 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/14 | 412 | सिबता सा पत् नी जागाबंधु सा | तैला | 0.055 |
| 296 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/15 | 413 | हाताकिसोरा प्रधान सुपुत्र दयानिधि प्रधान | तैला | 0.019 |
| 297 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/16 | 414 | सानतना बागा सुपुत्र खिती बागा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.077 |
| 298 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/18 | 415 | सारथी सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा | तैला | 0.038 |
| 299 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/19 | 416 | भागाबत सा सुपुत्र बाला सा | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.016 |
| 300 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/20 | 417 | िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा ओर अन् य | तैला | 0.116 |
| 301 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/22 | 418 | धमेन् सा सुपुत्र रबिन् सा | तैला | 0.108 |
| 302 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/23 | 419 | मनोज कु मार सा सुपुत्र राज सा | तैला | 0.062 |
| 303 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/24 | 420 | र ंजीता प्रधानसुपुत्र हरमोहन प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.011 |
| 304 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/24 | 421 | र ंजीता प्रधानसुपुत्र हरमोहन प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.014 |
| 305 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/25 | 422 | िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य | तैला | 0.183 |
| 306 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/25 | 423 | िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य | तैला | 0.106 |
| 307 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/25 | 424 | िबनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन् य | तैला | 0.044 |
| 308 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/28 | 425 | तुकाना नायक सुपुत्र दिलासवर नायक | तैला | 0.047 |
| 309 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/26 | 426 | प्रफू ल कु मार सेठी सुपुत्र बौरीबंधु सेठी | तैला | 0.049 |
| 310 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/27 | 427 | क ु न्तला बहेरा पी सुचीदानंदा बहेरा | तैला | 0.033 |
| 311 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/29 | 428 | बीनापानी प्रधान पी कल्पासवर सा | तैला | 0.179 |
| 312 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/30 | 429 | गंगाधर बागा सुपुत्र बिकाल बागा | तैला | 0.017 |
| 313 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/31 | 430 | धीरेन् बागा सुपुत्र बिकल बागा | तैला | 0.017 |
| 314 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/32 | 431 | सुलोचना महाकु दा पी बिध्याधर महाकु दा | तैला | 0.020 |
| 315 | बिम्बाधारापुर | 34/33 | 432 | र ेबती रऊता पी तनुचन् ा रऊता | तैला | 0.020 |
| जोड़ : | 35.724 | |||||
| (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | ||||||
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | क ु डापासी | 114/27 | 3 | zीमता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.291 |
| 2 | क ु डापासी | 12 | 4 | क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरंगी नायक | तैला | 0.279 |
| 3 | क ु डापासी | 111 | 6 | सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे | तैला | 0.181 |
| 4 | क ु डापासी | 111 | 7 | सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे | तैला | 0.072 |
| 5 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 111 | 8 | सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे | तैला | 0.105 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 6 | क ु डापासी | 111 | 9 | सुदाम सिथे सुपुत्र बशु सिथे | तैला | 0.122 |
| 7 | क ु डापासी | 107 | 23 | zीराम सिथे सुपुत्र दुखु सिथे | तैला | 0.088 |
| 8 | क ु डापासी | 94 | 41 | रूमा माझी सुपुत्री भागबन माझी | तैला | 0.123 |
| 9 | क ु डापासी | 94 | 42 | रूमा माझी सुपुत्री भागबन माझी | तैला | 1.011 |
| 10 | क ु डापासी | 102 | 43 | श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | तैला | 0.161 |
| 11 | क ु डापासी | 102 | 44 | श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | तैला | 0.107 |
| 12 | क ु डापासी | 102 | 45 | श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | तैला | 0.081 |
| 13 | क ु डापासी | 102 | 46 | श्यामाघाना माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | पतीता | 0.043 |
| 14 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 48 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | पतीता | 0.032 |
| 15 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 49 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.086 |
| 16 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 50 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.022 |
| 17 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 51 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.040 |
| 18 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 57 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.022 |
| 19 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 58 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.022 |
| 20 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 59 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.022 |
| 21 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 60 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.028 |
| 22 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 61 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.026 |
| 23 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 64 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.057 |
| 24 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 65 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.026 |
| 25 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 68 | 66 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.068 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 26 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 67 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | पतीता | 0.052 |
| 27 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 76 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.038 |
| 28 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 77 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता तीनी | 0.082 |
| 29 | क ु डापासी | 68 | 78 | फकीरा माझी सुपुत्र भागबन माझी | पतीता | 0.145 |
| 30 | क ु डापासी | 16 | 79 | खागेर माझी सुपुत्र बागबन माझी | तैला | 0.695 |
| 31 | क ु डापासी | 16 | 80 | खागेर माझी सुपुत्र बागबन माझी | तैला | 0.227 |
| 32 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 81 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | तैला | 0.308 |
| 33 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 83 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | तैला | 0.307 |
| 34 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 84 | हडी सा सुपुत्र ◌ंगंगाधर सा | तैला | 0.315 |
| 35 | क ु डापासी | 66 | 98 | प्राणबंधु सा सुपुत्र पंचू सा | तैला | 0.071 |
| 36 | क ु डापासी | 66 | 99 | प्राणबंधु सा सुपुत्र पंचू सा | तैला | 0.101 |
| 37 | क ु डापासी | 114/27 | 103 | zीमाता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.420 |
| 38 | क ु डापासी | 40 | 104 | नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा | तैला | 0.282 |
| 39 | क ु डापासी | 13 | 107 | क े साबा सा सुपुत्र कु ं गई सा | तैला | 0.080 |
| 40 | क ु डापासी | 40 | 109 | नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा | तैला | 0.205 |
| 41 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 115 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.275 |
| 42 | क ु डापासी | 114/40 | 116 | मनमोहन प्रधान सुपुत्र गदाधर प्रधान | तैला | 0.046 |
| 43 | क ु डापासी | 114/8 | 117 | पंचाली बारिक पी प्रभारत किरन बारिक | तैला | 0.085 |
| 44 | क ु डापासी | 87 | 122 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली | 0.075 |
| 45 | क ु डापासी | 87 | 123 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली | 0.157 |
| 46 | क ु डापासी | 87 | 125 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | तैला | 0.164 |
| 47 | क ु डापासी | 87 | 126 | महान सा सुपुत्र कु -रू सा | तैला | 0.143 |
| 48 | क ु डापासी | 72 | 128 | बलराम माझी सुपुत्र चैतन्या माझी और अन्य | तैला | 0.175 |
| 49 | क ु डापासी | 73 | 133 | बसुदेव सा सुपुत्र नंदा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.449 |
| 50 | क ु डापासी | 43 | 136 | नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा | तैला | 0.100 |
| 51 | क ु डापासी | 25 | 137 | चौधरी सा सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.164 |
| 52 | क ु डापासी | 43 | 138 | नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा | तैला | 0.083 |
| 53 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 30 | 142 | जोगी माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी और | तैला | 0.527 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| अन्य | ||||||
| 54 | क ु डापासी | 30 | 143 | जोगी माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी और अन्य | तैला | 0.048 |
| 55 | क ु डापासी | 84 | 144 | भागीरथी माझी सुपुत्र बीरा माझी और अन्य | तैला | 0.420 |
| 56 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 166 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंदा प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.756 |
| 57 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 179 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता एक फसली | 0.216 |
| 58 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 180 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.024 |
| 59 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 181 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.009 |
| 60 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 182 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.131 |
| 61 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 183 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.009 |
| 62 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 184 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.177 |
| 63 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 185 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | भागायत देई | 0.062 |
| 64 | क ु डापासी | 39 | 187 | नाकाफोडी प्रधान सुपुत्र साहेब प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.043 |
| 65 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 189 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.030 |
| 66 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 190 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.045 |
| 67 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 191 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.017 |
| 68 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 192 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.017 |
| 69 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 194 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.383 |
| 70 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 195 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.197 |
| 71 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 79 | 196 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.169 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 72 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 197 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.018 |
| 73 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 198 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.014 |
| 74 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 199 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.014 |
| 75 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 200 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.206 |
| 76 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 201 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.315 |
| 77 | क ु डापासी | 79 | 202 | बेनुधर प्रधान सुपुत्र नारन प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.675 |
| 78 | क ु डापासी | 23 | 204 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.016 |
| 79 | क ु डापासी | 114/65 | 206 | बिनाथ सेठी सुपुत्र कै लाश सेठी | तैला | 0.145 |
| 80 | क ु डापासी | 1 | 215 | अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.232 |
| 81 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 222 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.040 |
| 82 | क ु डापासी | 74 | 224 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.042 |
| 83 | क ु डापासी | 74 | 225 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.137 |
| 84 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 226 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.061 |
| 85 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 227 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.195 |
| 86 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 229 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.030 |
| 87 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 231 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.031 |
| 88 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 232 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.113 |
| 89 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 233 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.016 |
| 90 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 234 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.066 |
| 91 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 81 | 235 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.040 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 92 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 236 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.039 |
| 93 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 237 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंसीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.044 |
| 94 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 240 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.045 |
| 95 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 241 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.020 |
| 96 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 242 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.150 |
| 97 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 243 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पपीता | 0.008 |
| 98 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 244 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.086 |
| 99 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 245 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.098 |
| 100 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 246 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.012 |
| 101 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 247 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.010 |
| 102 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 248 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.072 |
| 103 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 249 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.079 |
| 104 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 253 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.116 |
| 105 | क ु डापासी | 81 | 254 | बैशनाबा प्रधान सुपुत्र नित्यानंद प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.025 |
| 106 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 260 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.181 |
| 107 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 263 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.151 |
| 108 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 265 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.013 |
| 109 | क ु डापासी | 75 | 266 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य | पतीता | 0.012 |
| 110 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 75 | 267 | बिsम प्रधान सुपुत्र बंशीधर प्रधान और अन्य | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.160 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 111 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 273 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.228 |
| 112 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 274 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.233 |
| 113 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 275 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.247 |
| 114 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 276 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.075 |
| 115 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 277 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.132 |
| 116 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 278 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.106 |
| 117 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 279 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.283 |
| 118 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 280 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.285 |
| 119 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 281 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.028 |
| 120 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 282 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.019 |
| 121 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 283 | पडिया सा सुपुत्र नहैया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.091 |
| 122 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 284 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.080 |
| 123 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 289 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.021 |
| 124 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 290 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.022 |
| 125 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 291 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.046 |
| 126 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 292 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | तैला | 0.011 |
| 127 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 293 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.010 |
| 128 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 295 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | तैला | 0.007 |
| 129 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 297 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.065 |
| 130 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 298 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.030 |
| 131 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 54 | 299 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.027 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 132 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 300 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.014 |
| 133 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 301 | पिड़या सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.029 |
| 134 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 302 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.089 |
| 135 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 303 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.037 |
| 136 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 304 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.042 |
| 137 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 305 | हदीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकादुसिया सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.098 |
| 138 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 306 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता देई | 0.033 |
| 139 | क ु डापासी | 54 | 307 | पड़िया सा सुपुत्र नहिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.044 |
| 140 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 309 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.107 |
| 141 | क ु डापासी | 114/86 | 317 | राठी सेठी सुपुत्र आनंद सेठी | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.036 |
| 142 | क ु डापासी | 114/86 | 318 | राठी सेठी सुपुत्र आनंद सेठी | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.016 |
| 143 | क ु डापासी | 114/73 | 319 | सरोिजनी नायक पत् नी अजय नायक | पतीता | 0.053 |
| 144 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 320 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.255 |
| 145 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 347 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.043 |
| 146 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 348 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.106 |
| 147 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 349 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.230 |
| 148 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 350 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.065 |
| 149 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 351 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.186 |
| 150 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 352 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.018 |
| 151 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 353 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.157 |
| 152 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 47 | 354 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.143 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 153 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 355 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.040 |
| 154 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 356 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.121 |
| 155 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 357 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.029 |
| 156 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 358 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.127 |
| 157 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 359 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.028 |
| 158 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 360 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.116 |
| 159 | क ु डापासी | 47 | 361 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.121 |
| 160 | क ु डापासी | 114/24 | 364 | बैशनब राउत सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउत | तैला | 0.155 |
| 161 | क ु डापासी | 114/24 | 365 | बैशनब राउत सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउत | तैला | 0.126 |
| 162 | क ु डापासी | 99 | 367 | सारथी प्रधान सुपुत्र सिबा प्रधान | तैला | 0.182 |
| 163 | क ु डापासी | 46 | 370 | नु-रा सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा | तैला | 0.259 |
| 164 | क ु डापासी | 114/79 | 371 | मनोज कु मार सा सुपुत्र गऊरा चन् ा सा | तैला | 0.082 |
| 165 | क ु डापासी | 88 | 375 | माही दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे | तैला | 0.101 |
| 166 | क ु डापासी | 10 | 377 | कल्पतारू दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे और अन्य | तैला | 0.114 |
| 167 | क ु डापासी | 10 | 378 | कल्पतारू दे-रे सुपुत्र राम दे-रे और अन्य | तैला | 0.319 |
| 168 | क ु डापासी | 114/29 | 379 | जोगेन् मलिक सुपुत्र नरोत्तम मलिक | तैला | 0.251 |
| 169 | क ु डापासी | 58 | 380 | पलाऊ सा सुपुत्र नाताबार सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.397 |
| 170 | क ु डापासी | 23 | 381 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.233 |
| 171 | क ु डापासी | 57 | 382 | पलाऊ सा सुपुत्र नाता सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.211 |
| 172 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 386 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.049 |
| 173 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 387 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.081 |
| 174 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 388 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.201 |
| 175 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 389 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.207 |
| 176 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 390 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.051 |
| 177 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 391 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.067 |
| 178 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 392 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.102 |
| 179 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 393 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.099 |
| 180 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 29 | 395 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.110 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 181 | क ु डापासी | 29 | 396 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.193 |
| 182 | क ु डापासी | 29 | 397 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.050 |
| 183 | क ु डापासी | 28 | 398 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.046 |
| 184 | क ु डापासी | 29 | 400 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.109 |
| 185 | क ु डापासी | 29 | 401 | जंगली मतैरी सुपुत्र लखी धर मतैरी | तैला | 0.089 |
| 186 | क ु डापासी | 114/42 | 402 | प्रदीप प्रधान सुपुत्र त्रिलोचन प्रधान | तैला | 0.097 |
| 187 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 404 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.164 |
| 188 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 405 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.176 |
| 189 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 406 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.081 |
| 190 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 407 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.038 |
| 191 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 408 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.031 |
| 192 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 409 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.016 |
| 193 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 410 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.019 |
| 194 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 411 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.040 |
| 195 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 412 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.070 |
| 196 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 413 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.029 |
| 197 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 414 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.064 |
| 198 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 415 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.087 |
| 199 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 416 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.059 |
| 200 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 417 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.057 |
| 201 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 418 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.043 |
| 202 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 11 | 420 | कालांदी सा सुपुत्र सधाबा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.229 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 203 | क ु डापासी | 70 | 421 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.156 |
| 204 | क ु डापासी | 70 | 422 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा | पतीता | 0.020 |
| 205 | क ु डापासी | 70 | 423 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.160 |
| 206 | क ु डापासी | 70 | 424 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा | पतीता | 0.027 |
| 207 | क ु डापासी | 114/27 | 425 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.056 |
| 208 | क ु डापासी | 114/27 | 426 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.162 |
| 209 | क ु डापासी | 12 | 427 | क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक | तैला | 0.149 |
| 210 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 428 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.035 |
| 211 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 429 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.032 |
| 212 | क ु डापासी | 53 | 430 | पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक | तैला | 0.064 |
| 213 | क ु डापासी | 12 | 431 | क ु लमणि नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.062 |
| 214 | क ु डापासी | 12 | 432 | क ु लमिण नायक सुपुत्र बैरागी नायक | तैला | 0.053 |
| 215 | क ु डापासी | 114/48 | 434 | धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा | तैला | 0.018 |
| 216 | क ु डापासी | 114/50 | 435 | प्रदीप सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | तैला | 0.037 |
| 217 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 437 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.355 |
| 218 | क ु डापासी | 71 | 438 | बनबिहारी सा सुपुत्र मगुनी सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.065 |
| 219 | क ु डापासी | 114/48 | 439 | धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा | तैला | 0.056 |
| 220 | क ु डापासी | 114/48 | 440 | धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा | तैला | 0.036 |
| 221 | क ु डापासी | 114/50 | 441 | प्रदीप सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | तैला | 0.070 |
| 222 | क ु डापासी | 114/49 | 442 | खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | तैला | 0.032 |
| 223 | क ु डापासी | 114/49 | 443 | खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | तैला | 0.023 |
| 224 | क ु डापासी | 114/49 | 444 | खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | तैला | 0.045 |
| 225 | क ु डापासी | 114/49 | 445 | खितीस चन् सा सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.029 |
| 226 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114/45 | 446 | मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधन सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.041 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 227 | क ु डापासी | 109 | 447 | सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.023 |
| 228 | क ु डापासी | 109 | 448 | सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.025 |
| 229 | क ु डापासी | 109 | 449 | सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.015 |
| 230 | क ु डापासी | 109 | 450 | सुखिला सा सुपुत्र बैरा सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.021 |
| 231 | क ु डापासी | 43 | 452 | नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.041 |
| 232 | क ु डापासी | 43 | 453 | नीलामणि सा सुपुत्र हरि सा | तैला | 0.018 |
| 233 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 454 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा | तैला | 0.050 |
| 234 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 499 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा | तैला | 0.018 |
| 235 | क ु डापासी | 108 | 500 | सुकांती नायक पत् नी चैतन्य नायक | तैला | 0.141 |
| 236 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 501 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.022 |
| 237 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 502 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.037 |
| 238 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 503 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.053 |
| 239 | क ु डापासी | 24 | 504 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैव नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.061 |
| 240 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 505 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.058 |
| 241 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 506 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.040 |
| 242 | क ु डापासी | 114/43 | 507 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.072 |
| 243 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 531 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.050 |
| 244 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 532 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.077 |
| 245 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 533 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.014 |
| 246 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 534 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.062 |
| 247 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 535 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.103 |
| 248 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 52 | 536 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.119 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 249 | क ु डापासी | 52 | 537 | पथानी सा सुपुत्र एकादुसई सा | पतीता | 0.025 |
| 250 | क ु डापासी | 114/48 | 538 | धीरेन् सा सुपुत्र पबीतरा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.025 |
| 251 | क ु डापासी | 114/45 | 539 | मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधना सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.070 |
| 252 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 540 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.039 |
| 253 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 541 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.018 |
| 254 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 542 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.018 |
| 255 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 543 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.009 |
| 256 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 544 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.011 |
| 257 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 545 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.012 |
| 258 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 546 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.015 |
| 259 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 547 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.012 |
| 260 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 548 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.022 |
| 261 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 549 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कास्तु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.022 |
| 262 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 550 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.084 |
| 263 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 551 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.081 |
| 264 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 552 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.027 |
| 265 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 553 | पंचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.035 |
| 266 | क ु डापासी | 114/26 | 554 | धबई सा सुपुत्र हादीबंधु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.020 |
| 267 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 61 | 555 | परदेसी माझी सुपुत्र निमई माझी और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.094 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 268 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 556 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.097 |
| 269 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 557 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.132 |
| 270 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 558 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.044 |
| 271 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 559 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.013 |
| 272 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 560 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.027 |
| 273 | क ु डापासी | 61 | 561 | परदेसी माझी सुपुत्र निमई माझी और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.041 |
| 274 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 562 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.036 |
| 275 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 563 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.034 |
| 276 | क ु डापासी | 114 | 564 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.046 |
| 277 | क ु डापासी | 77 | 565 | बीरा सा सुपुत्र गंगा सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.094 |
| 278 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 566 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.077 |
| 279 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 567 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.060 |
| 280 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 568 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.016 |
| 281 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 569 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.016 |
| 282 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 570 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.011 |
| 283 | क ु डापासी | 50 | 571 | पांचू सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.021 |
| 284 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 572 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.032 |
| 285 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 573 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.016 |
| 286 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114/26 | 574 | धुबई सा सुपुत्र हादीबंधु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.020 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 287 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 575 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.036 |
| 288 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 576 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.122 |
| 289 | क ु डापासी | 95 | 577 | लमी सा सुपुत्री कस्तु सा अन्य | पतीता | 0.007 |
| 290 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 582 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.055 |
| 291 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 583 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | पतीता | 0.036 |
| 292 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 584 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.148 |
| 293 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 585 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.027 |
| 294 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 586 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.031 |
| 295 | क ु डापासी | 80 | 587 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्र बुधिया सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.035 |
| 296 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 594 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.052 |
| 297 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 595 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.025 |
| 298 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 596 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.053 |
| 299 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 597 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.059 |
| 300 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 598 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.048 |
| 301 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 599 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.091 |
| 302 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 606 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.058 |
| 303 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 607 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.039 |
| 304 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 616 | इन् ा सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.040 |
| 305 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 617 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.031 |
| 306 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 618 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा | तैला | 0.031 |
| 307 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 619 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.072 |
| 308 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 620 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.034 |
| 309 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114 | 621 | हादी सा सुपुत्र गंगाधर सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.090 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 310 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 622 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.093 |
| 311 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 623 | इन् ा सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.072 |
| 312 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 624 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा | तैला | 0.018 |
| 313 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 625 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगबान सा | तैला | 0.019 |
| 314 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 626 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.022 |
| 315 | क ु डापासी | 17 | 627 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा | तैला | 0.030 |
| 316 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 628 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.022 |
| 317 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 629 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.049 |
| 318 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 630 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.018 |
| 319 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 632 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.045 |
| 320 | क ु डापासी | 33 | 633 | दुखई सा सुपुत्र महान सा | तैला | 0.072 |
| 321 | क ु डापासी | 65 | 637 | पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा | तैला | 0.119 |
| 322 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 638 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.035 |
| 323 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 639 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.066 |
| 324 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 640 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.064 |
| 325 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 641 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.070 |
| 326 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 642 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.011 |
| 327 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 643 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.012 |
| 328 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 644 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.011 |
| 329 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 645 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.008 |
| 330 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 646 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.028 |
| 331 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 647 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.013 |
| 332 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 648 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.025 |
| 333 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 649 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.031 |
| 334 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 650 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.059 |
| 335 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 651 | िखरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.042 |
| 336 | क ु डापासी | 18 | 652 | खिरा सा सुपुत्र रघु सा और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.043 |
| 337 | क ु डापासी | 65 | 659 | पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.127 |
| 338 | क ु डापासी | 65 | 660 | पलूनी सा पत् नी मोहन सा | तैला | 0.097 |
| 339 | क ु डापासी | 33 | 661 | दुखई सा सुपुत्र मोहन सा | तैला | 0.109 |
| 340 | क ु डापासी | 113 | 671 | हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी | पतीता | 0.042 |
| 341 | क ु डापासी | 113 | 672 | हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.040 |
| 342 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 64 | 674 | प्रहलाद सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा | तैला | 0.445 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 343 | क ु डापासी | 114/82 | 675 | सुरेन् चन् माली सुपुत्र नीलय माली | तैला | 0.167 |
| 344 | क ु डापासी | 32 | 676 | दहाना नायक सुपुत्र चन्दल नायक | तैला | 0.387 |
| 345 | क ु डापासी | 92 | 682 | रासानंदा सा सुपुत्र बुधई माझी और अन्य | तैला | 0.090 |
| 346 | क ु डापासी | 113 | 686 | हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी | तैला | 0.115 |
| 347 | क ु डापासी | 113 | 688 | हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.174 |
| 348 | क ु डापासी | 113 | 689 | हरि माझी सुपुत्र दुआरी माझी | तैला | 0.020 |
| 349 | क ु डापासी | 78 | 692 | बुधई सा सुपुत्र आनंद सा | तैला | 0.001 |
| 350 | क ु डापासी | 4 | 738 | इन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.023 |
| 351 | क ु डापासी | 22 | 739 | चन् सा सुपुत्र भगवान सा | तैला | 0.031 |
| 352 | क ु डापासी | 15 | 955 | क े श्ब सा सुपुत्र जगई सा- और अन्य | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.011 |
| 353 | क ु डापासी | 114/31 | 956 | भागीरथी बहेरा सुपुत्र नाबाघाना बहेरा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.001 |
| 354 | क ु डापासी | 97 | 1227 | लोचन सा सुपुत्र जाडु सा | तैला | 0.184 |
| 355 | क ु डापासी | 53 | 1233 | पतीतापबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.040 |
| 356 | क ु डापासी | 103 | 1234 | zीनिबास नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.247 |
| 357 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1235 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.337 |
| 358 | क ु डापासी | 1 | 1236 | अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.241 |
| 359 | क ु डापासी | 114/71 | 1237 | विनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.320 |
| 360 | क ु डापासी | 114/25 | 1238 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.161 |
| 361 | क ु डापासी | 67 | 1239 | पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.147 |
| 362 | क ु डापासी | 67 | 1240 | पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.102 |
| 363 | क ु डापासी | 67 | 1243 | पिताम्बर नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.015 |
| 364 | क ु डापासी | 114/84 | 1244 | सत्यभामा सेठी पी घनश्याम सेठी | तैला | 0.082 |
| 365 | क ु डापासी | 1 | 1246 | अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.132 |
| 366 | क ु डापासी | 1 | 1247 | अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.031 |
| 367 | क ु डापासी | 1 | 1248 | अभिराम नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक | तैला | 0.230 |
| 368 | क ु डापासी | 5 | 1249 | उछाबा नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक और अन्य | तैला | 0.158 |
| 369 | क ु डापासी | 114/41 | 1250 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैशनब नायक | तैला | 0.088 |
| 370 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 5 | 1251 | उछाबा नायक सुपुत्र बालक नायक और | तैला | 0.075 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| अन्य | ||||||
| 371 | क ु डापासी | 114/18 | 1253 | मनोरंजन नायक सुपुत्र चैतन्य नायक | तैला | 0.091 |
| 372 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1254 | zीमांता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा | तैला | 0.036 |
| 373 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1255 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.057 |
| 374 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1256 | zीमांता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरन सा | तैला | 0.193 |
| 375 | क ु डापासी | 13 | 1258 | क े श्बा सा सुपुत्र कु ं गई सा | तैला | 0.206 |
| 376 | क ु डापासी | 89 | 1259 | रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा | तैला | 0.074 |
| 377 | क ु डापासी | 89 | 1260 | रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा | तैला | 0.094 |
| 378 | क ु डापासी | 40 | 1261 | नालू सा सुपुत्र बौरी सा | तैला | 0.164 |
| 379 | क ु डापासी | 114/29 | 1262 | जोगेन् मलिक सुपुत्र नरोत्तम मलिक | तैला | 0.350 |
| 380 | क ु डापासी | 114/69 | 1263 | दुर्गा चरन नायक सुपुत्र पतीतापावन नायक | घाराबड़ी | 0.025 |
| 381 | क ु डापासी | 93 | 1265 | राम सेथे सुपुत्र दुखु सेथे | घाराबड़ी | 0.020 |
| 382 | क ु डापासी | 63 | 1266 | प्रहलाद माझी सुपुत्र बौरी माझी | घाराबड़ी | 0.022 |
| 383 | क ु डापासी | 86 | 1268 | भोलेर सा सुपुत्र बंगुरू सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.020 |
| 384 | क ु डापासी | 42 | 1269 | िनरंजन माझी सुपुत्र बीरा सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.017 |
| 385 | क ु डापासी | 41 | 1271 | निमई माझी सुपुत्र ठाका माझी | घाराबड़ी | 0.020 |
| 386 | क ु डापासी | 114/77 | 1272 | बल्लभ चन् प्रधान सुपुत्र हल्धर प्रधान | घाराबड़ी | 0.019 |
| 387 | क ु डापासी | 6 | 1274 | कास्तु बाघा सुपुत्र कमार बाघा | घाराबड़ी | 0.015 |
| 388 | क ु डापासी | 96 | 1275 | लमण सा सुपुत्र पांछू सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.018 |
| 389 | क ु डापासी | 90 | 1277 | रमेश नायक सुपुत्र कालिया नायक | घाराबड़ी | 0.017 |
| 390 | क ु डापासी | 35 | 1282 | दोलागोविदा सा सुपुत्र नेबई सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.020 |
| 391 | क ु डापासी | 89 | 1284 | रमेश सा सुपुत्र नबई सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.019 |
| 392 | क ु डापासी | 114/22 | 1286 | पंचाली बारिक पत् नी प्रभात किरण बारिक | घाराबड़ी | 0.015 |
| 393 | क ु डापासी | 114/37 | 1288 | कौश्ल्या बहेरा पी सुजीत बहेरा | घाराबड़ी | 0.016 |
| 394 | क ु डापासी | 55 | 1291 | पाबित्रा सा सुपुत्र पथानी सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.014 |
| 395 | क ु डापासी | 34 | 1293 | दुरजु सा सुपुत्र पथारनी सा | घाराबड़ी | 0.012 |
| 396 | क ु डापासी | 98 | 1295 | सरबेर मतैरी सुपुत्र लमी धन मतैरी | घाराबड़ी | 0.021 |
| 397 | क ु डापासी | 112 | 1297 | सुशांत प्रधान सुपुत्र निमई प्रधान और अन्य | घाराबड़ी | 0.018 |
| 398 | क ु डापासी | 114/6 | 1300 | चितन्या नायक सुपुत्र विबा नायक | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.123 |
| 399 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114/7 | 1301 | खिरोदा कु मार महाराना सुपुत्र जतैया | तैला | 0.081 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| महाराना | ||||||
| 400 | क ु डापासी | 114/8 | 1302 | पंचाली बारिक पत् नी प्रभात किरन बारिक | तैला | 0.061 |
| 401 | क ु डापासी | 114/41 | 1303 | चैतन्य नायक सुपुत्र बैब नायक | तैला | 0.090 |
| 402 | क ु डापासी | 114/11 | 1304 | धर्मापाड़ा सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा | तैला | 0.138 |
| 403 | क ु डापासी | 114/11 | 1305 | धर्मापाड़ा सा सुपुत्र पांचू सा | तैला | 0.114 |
| 404 | क ु डापासी | 114/12 | 1306 | पतीतापाबन नायक सुपुत्र जयकृ ष्णा नायक | तैला | 0.081 |
| 405 | क ु डापासी | 114/13 | 1307 | मनमोहन सा सुपुत्र सुकरू सा | तैला | 0.057 |
| 406 | क ु डापासी | 114/16 | 1308 | हादीबंधु सा सुपुत्र इकदुसिया सा | तैला | 0.045 |
| 407 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1309 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.231 |
| 408 | क ु डापासी | 114/30 | 1314 | बिबा राउता सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउता | तैला | 0.093 |
| 409 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1316 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.164 |
| 410 | क ु डापासी | 114/33 | 1317 | zीमंता कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.129 |
| 411 | क ु डापासी | 114/30 | 1318 | विबा राउता सुपुत्र पूर्णा चन् राउता | तैला | 0.201 |
| 412 | क ु डापासी | 114/34 | 1319 | प्रमीला नायक सुपुत्र कीर्तन नायक | तैला | 0.237 |
| 413 | क ु डापासी | 114/38 | 1320 | बिनोद कु मार सा सुपुत्र मधुसुदन सा | तैला | 0.090 |
| 414 | क ु डापासी | 114/19 | 1321 | गनया रंजन नायक सुपुत्र चितन्या नायक | तैला | 0.158 |
| 415 | क ु डापासी | 114/39 | 1322 | आलोक कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा | तैला | 0.066 |
| 416 | क ु डापासी | 114/45 | 1324 | मनगोविदा सा सुपुत्र दुरजयाधना सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.036 |
| 417 | क ु डापासी | 114/46 | 1325 | नारायण सा सुपुत्र प्रणाबंधु सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.049 |
| 418 | क ु डापासी | 114/46 | 1326 | नारायण सा सुपुत्र प्रणाबंधु सा | तैला | 0.017 |
| 419 | क ु डापासी | 114/47 | 1327 | सिबरामा सा सुपुत्र पबीत्रा सा | तैला | 0.010 |
| 420 | क ु डापासी | 114/47 | 1328 | सिबरामा सा सुपुत्र पबीत्रा सा | तैला | 0.005 |
| 421 | क ु डापासी | 114/51 | 1329 | ससमितरानी प्रधान पी उमाकांत माझी | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.184 |
| 422 | क ु डापासी | 114/53 | 1330 | रश्मीता सा पी प्रदीप कु मार प्रधान | तैला | 0.074 |
| 423 | क ु डापासी | 114/54 | 1331 | अजित कु मार दे-री सुपुत्र दुयiधन दे-री | तैला | 0.045 |
| 424 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114/57 | 1333 | पिताबस सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा | तैला | 0.049 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 425 | क ु डापासी | 114/58 | 1334 | सारथी सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा | तैला | 0.046 |
| 426 | क ु डापासी | 114/59 | 1335 | zीनिबास सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा | तैला | 0.048 |
| 427 | क ु डापासी | 114/60 | 1336 | सुरथ सा सुपुत्र गौरा सा | तैला | 0.038 |
| 428 | क ु डापासी | 114/61 | 1337 | राके श रंजन रऊता सुपुत्र प्रफू ल्ल कु मार रऊता | तैला | 0.101 |
| 429 | क ु डापासी | 114/63 | 1338 | राजकिशोर दे-री सुपुत्र महेर दे-री | तैला | 0.159 |
| 430 | क ु डापासी | 114/81 | 1339 | प्रशांत कु मार सा सुपुत्र नेत्रनंदा सा | तैला | 0.120 |
| 431 | क ु डापासी | 114/64 | 1340 | संतवोना मिzा पत् नी नरेन् कु मार मिzा | तैला | 0.048 |
| 432 | क ु डापासी | 114/66 | 1341 | देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा | तैला | 0.056 |
| 433 | क ु डापासी | 114/66 | 1342 | देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा | तैला | 0.018 |
| 434 | क ु डापासी | 114/66 | 1343 | देबा सा सुपुत्र बुधई सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.060 |
| 435 | क ु डापासी | 114/67 | 1344 | चिनमया कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत क ु मार बहेरा | तैला | 0.159 |
| 436 | क ु डापासी | 114/68 | 1345 | बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा | तैला | 0.119 |
| 437 | क ु डापासी | 114/68 | 1346 | बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा | तैला | 0.014 |
| 438 | क ु डापासी | 114/68 | 1347 | बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत कु मार बहेरा | तैला | 0.067 |
| 439 | क ु डापासी | 114/70 | 1348 | सुशांत कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा | तैला | 0.035 |
| 440 | क ु डापासी | 114/39 | 1349 | आलोक कु मार सा सुपुत्र रू मोहन सा | तैला | 0.042 |
| 441 | क ु डापासी | 114/73 | 1350 | सरोिजनी नायक पत् नी अजया नायक | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.015 |
| 442 | क ु डापासी | 114/74 | 1351 | तिकान सा सुपुत्र दुजयाधन सा | तैला | 0.111 |
| 443 | क ु डापासी | 114/75 | 1352 | ट ूना बहेरा सुपुत्र प्रकाश बहेरा | तैला | 0.096 |
| 444 | क ु डापासी | 114/76 | 1353 | बिनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुसांत कु मार बहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.385 |
| 445 | क ु डापासी | 114/78 | 1354 | अरूण प्रधान सुपुत्र मोहन प्रधान | तैला | 0.105 |
| 446 (4) Rाम – कु डापासी गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी ) | क ु डापासी | 114/85 | 1356 | करूणाकर महापात्रा सुपुत्र चन् मणि महापात्रा | तैला | 0.097 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 447 | क ु डापासी | 84 | 1357 | भागीरथी माझी सुपुत्र बीरा माझी और अन्य | घाराबड़ी | 0.011 |
| 448 | क ु डापासी | 114/87 | 1358 | सत्येन् प्रधान सुपुत्र घनश्याम प्रधान और अन्य | तैला | 0.125 |
| 449 | क ु डापासी | 114/88 | 1359 | उधाब सा और नरौत्तम सा | सारदा अंजलासािचता ितनी | 0.009 |
| 450 | क ु डापासी | 114/89 | 1360 | र ंजन बहेरा सुपुत्र रमेश बहेरा | तैला | 0.036 |
| 451 | क ु डापासी | 114/90 | 1361 | रजत कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र रमेश बहेरा | तैला | 0.035 |
| जोड़ : | $ाम क $ाम –––– कु डापासी $ाम $ाम क क ु डापासी | 42.488 | ||||
| (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) | ||||||
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | धौराखमान | 11 | 5 | घुरूदु सा सुपुत्र बुटु सा | तैला | 0.441 |
| 2 | धौराखमान | 43 | 10 | सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी | तैला | 0.237 |
| 3 | धौराखमान | 43 | 11 | सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी | तैला | 0.340 |
| 4 | धौराखमान | 43 | 12 | सुदई सेठी सुपुत्र नंदा सेठी | तैला | 0.194 |
| 5 | धौराखमान | 45/17 | 13 | मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन | तैला | 0.771 |
| 6 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 15 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.748 |
| 7 | धौराखमान | 8 | 16 | कस्तूरी सा सुपुत्र अरखिता दे-री और अन्य | तैला | 0.071 |
| 8 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) | धौराखमान | 45/19 | 17 | बैसनाबा राउत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राउत | तैला | 0.149 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 9 | धौराखमान | 45/19 | 18 | बैसनाबा राउत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राउत | तैला | 0.121 |
| 10 | धौराखमान | 45/42 | 20 | सुदर्शन दे-री सुपुत्र दांगी दे-री | तैला | 0.375 |
| 11 | धौराखमान | 24 | 21 | बालकृ ष्णा सा सुपुत्र भागबत सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.358 |
| 12 | धौराखमान | 28 | 40 | बैरागी सा सुपुत्री सबर सा | तैला | 0.479 |
| 13 | धौराखमान | 24 | 53 | बालकृ ष्ण सा सुपुत्र भागबत सा और अन्य | तैला | 1.637 |
| 14 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 54 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.022 |
| 15 | धौराखमान | 45/17 | 84 | मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन | तैला | 0.267 |
| 16 | धौराखमान | 35 | 85 | मिलू बहेरा सुपुत्र हल्धर बहेरा | तैला | 0.072 |
| 17 | धौराखमान | 45/45 | 86 | प्रफु ल्ल कु मार सेठी सुपुत्र बौरी बंधु सेठी | तैला | 0.101 |
| 18 | धौराखमान | 45/41 | 87 | विनय कु मार बहेरा सुपुत्र सुशांत क ु मार बहेरा और अन्य | तैला | 0.307 |
| 19 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 92 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.622 |
| 20 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 93 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.065 |
| 21 | धौराखमान | 2 | 94 | अंतरयामी सा सुपुत्र धानी सा | तैला | 0.079 |
| 22 | धौराखमान | 20 | 98 | पुनिया सा सुपुत्री दामबुरू सा | तैला | 0.136 |
| 23 | धौराखमान | 22 | 99 | बौरीबंधु दे-री सुपुत्र पानू दे-री | तैला | 0.101 |
| 24 | धौराखमान | 20 | 103 | पुनिया सा सुपुत्री दमबुरू सा | तैला | 0.170 |
| 25 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) | धौराखमान | 45/17 | 104 | मानव रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन | तैला | 0.245 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 26 | धौराखमान | 45/50 | 105 | िवश् नु बेहरा सुपुत्र दीनबंधु बहेरा | तैला | 0.039 |
| 27 | धौराखमान | 14 | 224 | जयकृ ष्णा प्रधान सुपुत्र दैतरी प्रधान | सारदा जलसािचता एक फसली | 0.153 |
| 28 | धौराखमान | 45/2 | 563 | भागीरती सा सुपुत्र नेपाला सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.037 |
| 29 | धौराखमान | 45/3 | 566 | परनाती बारिक पत् नी नारायण बारिक | तैला | 0.096 |
| 30 | धौराखमान | 45/4 | 567 | पावर्ती बारिक पत् नी अय कु मार बारिक | तैला | 0.036 |
| 31 | धौराखमान | 45/8 | 571 | पर्वत किरन बारिक सुपुत्र अनुकू ल बारिक | तैला | 0.036 |
| 32 | धौराखमान | 45/11 | 574 | पंचाली बारिक पत् नी पर्वत किरन बारिक | तैला | 0.026 |
| 33 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 575 | Rाम की कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.347 |
| 34 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 578 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.521 |
| 35 | धौराखमान | 45/12 | 579 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.129 |
| 36 | धौराखमान | 45/13 | 580 | बिनोदिनी राऊता पी विाबा राऊता | तैला | 0.151 |
| 37 | धौराखमान | 45/14 | 581 | बसंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिध्याधर सा | तैला | 0.049 |
| 38 | धौराखमान | 45/15 | 582 | ितकली बेहरा पत् नी दामबारू बहेरा | तैला | 0.142 |
| 39 | धौराखमान | 45/17 | 584 | मानस रंजन स्वैन सुपुत्र प्रहलाद स्वैन | तैला | 0.343 |
| 40 | धौराखमान | 45/19 | 587 | बैसनाबा राऊत सुपुत्र पूर्ण चन् राऊत | तैला | 0.120 |
| 41 | धौराखमान | 45/21 | 588 | Rाम कम्यूनिटी भूमि अध्यक्ष, ब्रहमनबिल के नाम | तैला | 0.595 |
| 42 | धौराखमान | 45/23 | 589 | zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.102 |
| 43 | धौराखमान | 45/23 | 590 | zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.194 |
| 44 (5) Rाम – धौराखमान गैर-वन भूिम (िनजी) | धौराखमान | 45/23 | 591 | zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण | तैला | 0.101 |
| s. सं. | आर.I सeकल/ Rाम | खाता संख्या | प्लाट संख्या | काश्तकारी का नाम | किस्म | परियोजना के लिए अपेक्षित क्षेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| सा | ||||||
| 45 | धौराखमान | 45/23 | 592 | zीमंत कु मार सा सुपुत्र बिु चरण सा | तैला | 0.194 |
| 46 | धौराखमान | 45/29 | 598 | दीपन्दु कु मार प्रधान सुपुत्र जडुमणि प्रधान | तैला | 0.114 |
| 47 | धौराखमान | 45/31 | 600 | धीरेन् कु मार सा सुपुत्र भास्क सा और अन्य | तैला | 0.440 |
| 48 | धौराखमान | 45/49 | 612 | दीपतिरनी बारिक पत् नी बरूण कु मार बारिक | तैला | 0.024 |
| जोड़ जोड़ : : : : जोड़ जोड़ | $ाम $ाम –––– धौराखमान $ाम $ाम धौराखमान | 12.099 |
सीमासीमासीमासीमा----िववरणिववरणिववरणिववरण: : : :
नैनी कोयला ब्लॉक की सीमा बिदु संख्या 1 से शुरू होती है, जो स्टेट हाईवे संख्या 63 के किनारे और गौदूनी नाला के दक्षिणी किनारे पर स्थित है। जहां से सीमा बिदु संख्या -29 तक जाने के लिए स्टेट हाइवे संख्या 63 (अंगुल टाउन की ओर) के साथ दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में आगे बढ़ती है। बिदु संख्या 29 से बिदु संख्या 136 तक सीमा बाएं मुड़के उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर बढ़ती है, और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन पर चलती Cई बिदु संख्या 136 तक पCँचती है । बिदु संख्या 136 से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर मुड़के गाँव तेंतुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर होकर आगे सवE नंबर 195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से होकर गुजरती है।
बिदु संख्या ए से बिदु संख्या सी तक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर मुड़के गाँव कसीडीहा होकर आगे सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 से होकर गुजरती है । बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'ड.' तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर- पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव थलीपिस से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव कु दापसी से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 30 तक सीमा आगे बढ़ कर उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गाँव धौराखमान से होकर गुज़रती है, जो सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से होकर गुज़रती है । बिदु संख्या 30 से बिदु संख्या 31 तक सीमा बायL की ओर मुड़के उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में जाती है, जो कि धौराखमान से होकर गुजरती है जो सवE नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 से होकर गुज़रती है और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा पर बिदु संख्या 31 को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 31 से लेकर बिदु संख्या 35 तक सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में आगे बढ़ कर छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन पर स्थित बिदु संख्या 35 से मिलती है । बिदु संख्या 35 से बिदु संख्या 1 तक की सीमा बायL ओर मुड़के दक्षिण-पMिम दिशा में गौदुनी नाला के दक्षिण किनारे से धारा के साथ बिदु संख्या 1 से मिलती है जहां से सीमा शुरू Cई थी।
(1) Oाम: तन्तुलोई गोपीनाथपुर : सीमा बिदु संख्या -136, 'क' और 'ख' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा बिदु संख्या -136 से शुरू होती है, जो कि त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के पास स्थित है और सवE नंबर 195 पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा और ब्लॉक सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या -136 से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर पूर्व दिशा में गाँव तेंतुलोइ गोपीनाथपुर से होते Cए सवE नंबर -195, 194, 193, 201, 200 से गुजर कर सवE नंबर -200 पर[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2629 उत्तर पूर्वी छोर पर गाँव की सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'क' से बिदु संख्या 'ख' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर -200, 199, 195 से होकर जाती Cई बिदु संख्या 'ख' पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को उत्तर- पूर्व दिशा में छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'ख' से बिदु संख्या -136 तक यह तेंतुलोई गोपीनाथपुर गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच सामान्य सीमा है।
(2) Oाम: कासीडीहा : सीमा बिदु संख्या 'क', 'ग', 'घ', और 'ख' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'क', जो कि सवE नंबर -36 और सवE नंबर 34 के लिए आम बिदु पर स्थित है, से शुरू होती है। बिदु संख्या 'क' से बिदु संख्या 'ग' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती है, जो कसीडीहा गाँव से होते Cए सवE नंबर 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 को छू ती Cई उत्तर-पूर्व की ओर गाँव की सीमा सवE नंबर 17 पर समाप्त होती है। बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'घ' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में चली गई और त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु से गुजरती है, और सवE नंबर 2, 1 के साथ आगे बढ़ कर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 'घ' पर छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'घ' से बिदु संख्या 'ख' तक यह कसीडीहा गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ख' से बिदु संख्या 'क' तक की गांव की सीमा दक्षिण-पMिम दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 30, 31, 32, 36 को समावेश करती है और बिदु संख्या 'क' पर सीमा बंद होती है।
(3) Oाम : थलीपसी: सीमा बिदु संख्या 'ग', 'ड.', 'च', 'छ', और 'घ' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'ग' से शुरू होती है, जो सवE नंबर 20 पर स्थित है। बिदु संख्या 'ग' से बिदु संख्या 'ड.' तक, ब्लॉक सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व की दिशा में गांव थलीपिस के बीच से सवE नंबर 20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229 , 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 और 546 से गुजरकर उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा में गाँव की सीमा सवE नं 546 को छू ती है ।
बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से लेकर बिदु संख्या 'च' तक, गाँव की सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में सवE नं 546, 545, 542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523 को संवेशित करते Cए जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'च' से बिदु संख्या 'छ' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर -510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403, 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, और 1 को संवेशित करते Cए पMिम दिशा में बिदु संख्या 'छ' पर छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'छ' से बिदु संख्या 'घ' तक यह थलीपिस गांव और छेंड़ीपड़ा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'घ' से बिदु संख्या 'ग' तक गांव की सीमा दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'ग' पर बंद होती है।
(4) Oाम: बिम्बाधरपुर : सीमा बिदु संख्या 'छ', 'च', और 'ज' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'छ' से शुरू होती है जो त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के करीब है और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 'छ' से बिदु संख्या 'च' तक, गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379 को संवेिशत करते Cए पूर्व दिशा में जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'च' से बिदु संख्या 'ज' तक गांव की सीमा सवE नंबर 387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर -पMिम दिशा में बिदु संख्या 'ज' पर छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को छू ती है।
बिदु संख्या 'ज' से बिदु संख्या 'छ' तक यह बिम्बाधरपुर गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है, जो कि बिदु संख्या 'छ' पर बंद होती है।
(5) Oाम: कु डापासी: सीमा बिदु संख्या 'ड.', 'झ', 'ञ', 'ज' और 'च' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से शुरू होती है, जो कि सवE नंबर 678 पर त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु के करीब स्थित है।
बिदु संख्या 'ड.' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक ब्लॉक की सीमा उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर कु डापासी के बीच सवE नं 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461 के मध्य से गुजर कर जाती है। बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 'ञ' तक गाँव की सीमा उत्तर-पMिम दिशा की ओर सवE नं 461, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 को संवेशित करते Cए छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 'ञ' पर छू ती है।
बिदु संख्या 'ञ' से बिदु संख्या एच तक यह कु डापासी गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ज' से बिदु संख्या 'च' और बिदु संख्या 'ड.', गाँव की सीमा दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा में सवE नंबर 1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353,2630 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678, को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'ड.' पर बंद होती है।
(6) Oाम: धौराखमान: बिदु संख्या 'झ', 30, 31 और 'ञ' से िघरी है।
Oाम की सीमा रेखा बिदु संख्या 'झ' से शुरू होती है, जो कि सवE नंबर 222 पर स्थित है। बिदु संख्या 'झ' से बिदु संख्या 30 तक ब्लॉक की सीमा गाँव धौराखमान और सवE नंबर 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269 से गुजर कर उत्तर-पूर्व दिशा की ओर जाती है। बिदु संख्या 30 से बिदु संख्या 31 तक ब्लॉक सीमा सवE नंबर 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 को संवेशित करते Cए उत्तर-पMिम दिशा में छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन सीमा को बिदु संख्या 31 पर छू ती है। बिदु संख्या 31 से बिदु संख्या 'ञ' तक, यह धौराखमान गांव और छेंदीपादा आरक्षित वन के बीच आम सीमा है। बिदु संख्या 'ञ' से बिदु संख्या 'झ' तक, Oाम की सीमा सवE नंबर 1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, त्रिकोणीय जंक्शन बिदु, 222, को संवेशित करते Cए बिदु संख्या 'झ' पर बंद होती है I
[फा. सं. 43015/18/2015-एलए एXड आईआर]
राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 655.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1704 (E), dated the 10th May, 2016 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisitions and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), and published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, part II, section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 11th May, 2016, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 912.7892 hectares (approximately) or 2255.502 acres (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification and the said notice was extended for a further period of one year commencing from 10th May, 2018 vide notification number 1651(E), dated the 17th April, 2018;
And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands prescribed in the Schedule appended to this notification.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said lands described in the schedule appended hereto.
Note 1: The plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the office of the General Manager, Naini Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited ( A Government Company), H. No. 129 of NAC, Mishrapada, District Angul -759122, Odisha or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700 001 or at the office of Collector and the District Magistrate, District Angul, Odisha.
Note 2 : Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of the section 8 of the said Act, relating to objection to acquisition, which provides as follows:-
"8. (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.
Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2631(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act."
Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata 700001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O.3347(E), dated the 9th December, 2015, published in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 10th December, 2015.
SCHEDULE
THE SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED
Naini Opencast Project, Naini Area
District-Angul, Odisha
[ Plan bearing number SCCL/Naini Area/Notification/2018/1, dated the 28th December, 2018]
All Rights:
(I) Table
| Sl. No. | Name of villages | Thana | Thana number | District | Type of land in hectares | Total in hectares | Total in acres | Remarks | ||
| Tenancy | Forest | Non- Forest Govt. | ||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
| 1 | Kasidiha | Chhendipada | 95 | Angul | 0.961 | 9.805 | 0.750 | 11.516 | 28.457 | Part |
| 2 | Tentuloi gopinathapur | Chhendipada | 94 | Angul | - | 1.461 | 0.654 | 2.115 | 5.226 | Part |
| 3 | Thalipasi | Chhendipada | 101 | Angul | 20.555 | 4.207 | 3.052 | 27.814 | 68.730 | Part |
| 4 | Bimbadharapur | Chhendipada | 102 | Angul | 35.724 | 51.101 | 8.873 | 95.698 | 236.475 | Full |
| 5 | Kudapasi | Chhendipada | 103 | Angul | 42.488 | 56.744 | 1.716 | 100.948 | 249.448 | Part |
| 6 | Dhaurakhaman | Chhendipada | 104 | Angul | 12.099 | 16.862 | 2.652 | 31.613 | 78.117 | Part |
| 7 | Chhendipada Reserve forest | Chhendipada | - | Angul | - | 643.095 | 0.000 | 643.095 | 1589.122 | Part |
| Total: | 111.827 | 783.275 | 17.697 | 912.799 | 2255.575 | |||||
| Total : 912.799 hectares (approximately) or 2255.575 acres (approximately) |
1. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kasidiha :
1 to 16, 17(P), 20(P), 23(P), 24(P), 25 to 29, 30(P), 31, 32(P), 33(P), 34(P), 36(P), 3092(P), 3138, 3176.
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Tentuloi Gopinathpur :
193(P), 194(P), 195(P), 196 to 199, 200(P), 201(P).
3. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Thalipasi :
1 to 17, 18(P), 19(P), 20(P), 52(P), 53 to 62, 63(P), 64(P), 66(P), 67, 68(P), 69 to 118, 119(P), 120(P), 229(P), 233(P), 234(P), 235, 236, 237(P), 238(P), 239, 240, 241(P), 242(P), 243, 244, 245(P), 247(P), 250(P), 251 to 431, 432(P), 433(P), 434(P), 436(P), 437(P), 449(P), 471(P), 472(P), 473, 474, 475, 476(P), 477 to 545, 546(P), 547(P), 548(P), 549, 550(P), 551(P), 552(P), 553(P), 561(P), 565, 566, 568, 569, 570, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583.
2632 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]4. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Bimbadharapur :
1 to 437.
5. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Kudapasi :
1 to 460, 461(P), 462(P), 463 to 466, 467(P), 492(P), 499(P), 500(P), 501 to 522, 523(P), 527(P), 528, 529(P), 530(P), 531(P), 532 to 630, 631(P), 632(P), 633(P), 634(P), 635(P), 636 to 677, 678(P), 679(P), 680(P), 681(P), 682(P), 685(P), 686(P), 687(P), 688, 689(P), 690, 691(P), 692(P), 737(P), 738, 739, 740, 741(P), 769(P), 770 to 783, 784(P), 795(P), 796(P), 797(P), 802(P), 803(P), 804, 805, 806, 807(P), 809(P), 955(P), 956(P), 1223, 1224(P), 1225 to 1231, 1233 to 1297, 1300 to 1311, 1314, 1316 to 1322, 1324 to 1331, 1333 to 1363.
6. Plot numbers to be acquired in Village Dhaurakhaman:
1 to 19, 20(P), 21(P), 22 to 52, 53(P), 54(P), 84(P), 85(P), 86 to 101, 102(P), 103, 104, 105(P), 176(P), 178(P), 179(P), 180(P), 181(P), 182 to 212, 213(P), 214 to 221, 222(P), 223(P), 224(P), 225(P), 226(P), 255(P), 256(P), 257(P), 258, 259, 260(P), 261, 262(P), 265(P), 266(P), 267, 268(P), 269(P), 270(P), 550 to 553, 558 to 563, 566, 567, 570 to 572, 574, 575, 578 to 582, 584, 587 to 592, 595, 596, 598, 599, 600, 605, 607, 612, 614.
7. Chhendipada Reserve forest: 643.095 hectares or 1589.122 acres.
The details of land to be acquired are given in the table below:—
(II) Table
| (1) Village –Kasidiha Non-Forest Land (Private) | ||||||
| Sl. No. | R.I Circle/ village | Khata No. | Plot No. | Name of the Tenant | Kissam | Area Required for Project in hectares |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 1 | Kasidiha | 44 | 3 | Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.136 |
| 2 | Kasidiha | 73 | 4 | Dasarathi Sahu S/o Padmalava Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.176 |
| 3 | Kasidiha | 167 | 5 | Maheswar sahu S/o Dasarathi Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.201 |
| 4 | Kasidiha | 44 | 9 | Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.090 |
| 5 | Kasidiha | 44 | 10 | Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.041 |
| 6 | Kasidiha | 44 | 11 | Choudhuri Pradhan S/o Lakhia Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.317 |
| Total : | Village : Kasidiha | 0.961 | ||||
| 1 | Thalipasi | 8 | 2 | Khiramohan Sahoo S/o Jogendar Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.607 |
| 2 | Thalipasi | 46/5 | 3 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu | Taila | 0.133 |
| 3 | Thalipasi | 45 | 4 | Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and others | Patita | 0.061 |
| 4 | Thalipasi | 45 | 5 | Sudarshan Nayak S/o Dibakar and Others | Taila | 0.178 |
| 5 | Thalipasi | 21 | 6 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.101 |
| 6 | Thalipasi | 21 | 7 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.174 |
| 7 | Thalipasi | 21 | 8 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.243 |
| 8 | Thalipasi | 21 | 9 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.174 |
| 9 | Thalipasi | 21 | 10 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.049 |
| 10 | Thalipasi | 43 | 12 | Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.118 |
| 11 | Thalipasi | 43 | 13 | Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.510 |
| 12 | Thalipasi | 43 | 14 | Santhakumar Sahoo S/o Sukru Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.049 |
| 13 | Thalipasi | 14 | 15 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.542 |
| 14 | Thalipasi | 14 | 16 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.257 |
| 15 | Thalipasi | 14 | 17 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.047 |
| 16 | Thalipasi | 14 | 18 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.198 |
| 17 | Thalipasi | 14 | 19 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.003 |
| 18 | Thalipasi | 21 | 52 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.067 |
| 19 | Thalipasi | 21 | 53 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.105 |
| 20 | Thalipasi | 21 | 54 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.105 |
| 21 | Thalipasi | 21 | 55 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.032 |
| 22 | Thalipasi | 21 | 56 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 23 | Thalipasi | 21 | 57 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 24 | Thalipasi | 21 | 58 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 25 | Thalipasi | 21 | 59 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 26 | Thalipasi | 21 | 60 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.040 |
| 27 | Thalipasi | 21 | 61 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 28 | Thalipasi | 21 | 62 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 29 | Thalipasi | 21 | 63 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 30 | Thalipasi | 17 | 64 | Dalagobonda Majhi S /o Maulamani majhi | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.106 |
| 31 | Thalipasi | 7 | 66 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.028 |
| 32 | Thalipasi | 7 | 67 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.122 |
| 33 | Thalipasi | 7 | 68 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 34 | Thalipasi | 7 | 69 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.046 |
| 35 | Thalipasi | 7 | 70 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 36 | Thalipasi | 7 | 71 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.091 |
| 37 | Thalipasi | 7 | 72 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.054 |
| 38 | Thalipasi | 7 | 73 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.040 |
| 39 | Thalipasi | 13 | 74 | Jogi Sahoo S/o Banchha Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.091 |
| 40 | Thalipasi | 7 | 75 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.178 |
| 41 | Thalipasi | 7 | 76 | Kesaba Sahoo S/o Jogai Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.091 |
| 42 | Thalipasi | 20 | 79 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.199 |
| 43 | Thalipasi | 20 | 80 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.059 |
| 44 | Thalipasi | 38 | 81 | Budhia Majhi S/o Nabagana majhi | Taila | 0.221 |
| 45 | Thalipasi | 20 | 87 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.460 |
| 46 | Thalipasi | 20 | 88 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.053 |
| 47 | Thalipasi | 6 | 91 | Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.040 |
| 48 | Thalipasi | 6 | 92 | Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo | Taila | 0.247 |
| 49 | Thalipasi | 27 | 95 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o.Madhusudan Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.353 |
| 50 | Thalipasi | 32 | 96 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Judunatha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.412 |
| 51 | Thalipasi | 25 | 97 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.015 |
| 52 | Thalipasi | 25 | 98 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.012 |
| 53 | Thalipasi | 25 | 99 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.024 |
| 54 | Thalipasi | 25 | 100 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.025 |
| 55 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 101 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.072 |
| 56 | Thalipasi | 30 | 102 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.190 |
| 57 | Thalipasi | 33 | 103 | Bhagabat gosain S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.031 |
| 58 | Thalipasi | 46/4 | 105 | Jasbant Pradhan S/o Joginath Pradhan and Others | Gharabari | 0.117 |
| 59 | Thalipasi | 9 | 106 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Gharabari | 0.119 |
| 60 | Thalipasi | 25 | 107 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Gharabari | 0.103 |
| 61 | Thalipasi | 44 | 108 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 62 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 109 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 63 | Thalipasi | 37 | 110 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 64 | Thalipasi | 30 | 111 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.158 |
| 65 | Thalipasi | 6 | 112 | Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo | Gharabari | 0.146 |
| 66 | Thalipasi | 22 | 115 | Padia Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.087 |
| 67 | Thalipasi | 6 | 116 | Kanhu Sahoo S/o Aarata Sahoo | Gharabari | 0.077 |
| 68 | Thalipasi | 21 | 117 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.102 |
| 69 | Thalipasi | 21 | 118 | Padiya Sahoo S/o Nahiya Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.090 |
| 70 | Thalipasi | 25 | 233 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.002 |
| 71 | Thalipasi | 39 | 234 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.111 |
| 72 | Thalipasi | 39 | 235 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.104 |
| 73 | Thalipasi | 15 | 236 | Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 74 | Thalipasi | 39 | 237 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.057 |
| 75 | Thalipasi | 39 | 238 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 76 | Thalipasi | 39 | 239 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.056 |
| 77 | Thalipasi | 39 | 240 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 78 | Thalipasi | 39 | 241 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 79 | Thalipasi | 39 | 242 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.013 |
| 80 | Thalipasi | 39 | 243 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 81 | Thalipasi | 39 | 244 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 82 | Thalipasi | 15 | 245 | Dibakar Pradhan S/o Nithyananda Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.003 |
| 83 | Thalipasi | 39 | 247 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.060 |
| 84 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 250 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 85 | Thalipasi | 25 | 251 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 86 | Thalipasi | 25 | 252 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 87 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 253 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 88 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 254 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.017 |
| 89 | Thalipasi | 44 | 255 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 90 | Thalipasi | 9 | 256 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 91 | Thalipasi | 9 | 257 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.016 |
| 92 | Thalipasi | 37 | 258 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 93 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 259 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 94 | Thalipasi | 25 | 260 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.018 |
| 95 | Thalipasi | 9 | 261 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.025 |
| 96 | Thalipasi | 25 | 262 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 97 | Thalipasi | 9 | 263 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 98 | Thalipasi | 25 | 264 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 99 | Thalipasi | 9 | 265 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 100 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 266 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 101 | Thalipasi | 44 | 267 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 102 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 268 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 103 | Thalipasi | 37 | 269 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.017 |
| 104 | Thalipasi | 44 | 270 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.014 |
| Pradhan | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 105 | Thalipasi | 37 | 271 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 106 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 272 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.061 |
| 107 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 273 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.049 |
| 108 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 274 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.020 |
| 109 | Thalipasi | 9 | 275 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 110 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 276 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.050 |
| 111 | Thalipasi | 25 | 277 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.063 |
| 112 | Thalipasi | 9 | 278 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 113 | Thalipasi | 37 | 279 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 114 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 280 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 115 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 281 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 116 | Thalipasi | 37 | 282 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.070 |
| 117 | Thalipasi | 44 | 283 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.067 |
| 118 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 284 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 119 | Thalipasi | 37 | 285 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.014 |
| 120 | Thalipasi | 37 | 286 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 121 | Thalipasi | 9 | 287 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 122 | Thalipasi | 25 | 288 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 123 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 289 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 124 | Thalipasi | 37 | 290 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.053 |
| 125 | Thalipasi | 44 | 291 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 126 | Thalipasi | 44 | 292 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 127 | Thalipasi | 44 | 293 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 128 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 294 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.035 |
| 129 | Thalipasi | 44 | 295 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.049 |
| Pradhan | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 130 | Thalipasi | 44 | 296 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 131 | Thalipasi | 37 | 297 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.088 |
| 132 | Thalipasi | 37 | 298 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.040 |
| 133 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 299 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 134 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 300 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 135 | Thalipasi | 44 | 301 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.075 |
| 136 | Thalipasi | 37 | 302 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.068 |
| 137 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 303 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.046 |
| 138 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 304 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 139 | Thalipasi | 44 | 305 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 140 | Thalipasi | 25 | 306 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 141 | Thalipasi | 25 | 307 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 142 | Thalipasi | 25 | 308 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 143 | Thalipasi | 25 | 309 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.058 |
| 144 | Thalipasi | 25 | 310 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 145 | Thalipasi | 25 | 311 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.046 |
| 146 | Thalipasi | 25 | 312 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.058 |
| 147 | Thalipasi | 25 | 313 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 148 | Thalipasi | 25 | 314 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 149 | Thalipasi | 25 | 315 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 150 | Thalipasi | 25 | 316 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 151 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 321 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.055 |
| 152 | Thalipasi | 9 | 322 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 153 | Thalipasi | 9 | 323 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.054 |
| 154 | Thalipasi | 9 | 324 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.049 |
| 155 | Thalipasi | 9 | 325 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.060 |
| 156 | Thalipasi | 9 | 326 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 157 | Thalipasi | 9 | 327 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.047 |
| 158 | Thalipasi | 9 | 328 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.049 |
| 159 | Thalipasi | 9 | 329 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 160 | Thalipasi | 9 | 330 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 161 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 331 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 162 | Thalipasi | 36 | 332 | Birabar Pradhan S/o Madhusudan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 163 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 333 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.015 |
| 164 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 334 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 165 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 335 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 166 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 336 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 167 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 337 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 168 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 338 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.119 |
| 169 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 339 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.064 |
| 170 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 340 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 171 | Thalipasi | 37 | 341 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 172 | Thalipasi | 37 | 342 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.021 |
| 173 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 344 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.025 |
| 174 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 345 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.035 |
| 175 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 346 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.066 |
| 176 | Thalipasi | 37 | 347 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.102 |
| 177 | Thalipasi | 44 | 348 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 178 | Thalipasi | 44 | 349 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 179 | Thalipasi | 37 | 350 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.075 |
| 180 | Thalipasi | 37 | 351 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.076 |
| 181 | Thalipasi | 44 | 352 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.145 |
| 182 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 353 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.102 |
| 183 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 354 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.083 |
| 184 | Thalipasi | 37 | 355 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.076 |
| 185 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 356 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.032 |
| 186 | Thalipasi | 44 | 357 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 187 | Thalipasi | 44 | 358 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 188 | Thalipasi | 44 | 359 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 189 | Thalipasi | 37 | 360 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.018 |
| 190 | Thalipasi | 37 | 361 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 191 | Thalipasi | 37 | 362 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.035 |
| 192 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 363 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.063 |
| 193 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 364 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 194 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 365 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.056 |
| 195 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 367 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 196 | Thalipasi | 9 | 369 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.025 |
| 197 | Thalipasi | 9 | 370 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.020 |
| 198 | Thalipasi | 25 | 371 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 199 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 372 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.083 |
| 200 | Thalipasi | 25 | 373 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.040 |
| 201 | Thalipasi | 9 | 374 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 202 | Thalipasi | 9 | 375 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.016 |
| 203 | Thalipasi | 25 | 376 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.012 |
| 204 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 377 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 205 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 378 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 206 | Thalipasi | 25 | 379 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 207 | Thalipasi | 9 | 380 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 208 | Thalipasi | 9 | 381 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 209 | Thalipasi | 25 | 382 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 210 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 383 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 211 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 384 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 212 | Thalipasi | 25 | 385 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.024 |
| 213 | Thalipasi | 9 | 386 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.024 |
| 214 | Thalipasi | 9 | 387 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 215 | Thalipasi | 25 | 388 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 216 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 389 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.021 |
| 217 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 390 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 218 | Thalipasi | 25 | 391 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 219 | Thalipasi | 9 | 392 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 220 | Thalipasi | 9 | 393 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 221 | Thalipasi | 25 | 394 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 222 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 395 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 223 | Thalipasi | 46/3 | 396 | Jasobanta Pradhan S/o Jogeswar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 224 | Thalipasi | 25 | 397 | Prabhakar Pradhan S/o Madhusudhan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.032 |
| 225 | Thalipasi | 9 | 398 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 226 | Thalipasi | 9 | 399 | Girish Chandra Pradhan S/o Purendera Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.013 |
| 227 | Thalipasi | 37 | 400 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 228 | Thalipasi | 37 | 401 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.106 |
| 229 | Thalipasi | 44 | 402 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.064 |
| Pradhan | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 230 | Thalipasi | 44 | 403 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.046 |
| 231 | Thalipasi | 44 | 404 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.047 |
| 232 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 405 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.096 |
| 233 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 406 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.078 |
| 234 | Thalipasi | 44 | 407 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.083 |
| 235 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 408 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.108 |
| 236 | Thalipasi | 37 | 409 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.111 |
| 237 | Thalipasi | 37 | 410 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.100 |
| 238 | Thalipasi | 46/6 | 411 | Chandra Sekhar Pradhan S/o Choudhary Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.105 |
| 239 | Thalipasi | 44 | 412 | Sudarshan Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.088 |
| 240 | Thalipasi | 37 | 413 | Biswanath Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.118 |
| 241 | Thalipasi | 14 | 417 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.128 |
| 242 | Thalipasi | 14 | 421 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 243 | Thalipasi | 14 | 422 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 244 | Thalipasi | 14 | 423 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.090 |
| 245 | Thalipasi | 14 | 424 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Jalasay Ek | 0.014 |
| 246 | Thalipasi | 14 | 425 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.086 |
| 247 | Thalipasi | 14 | 426 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 248 | Thalipasi | 14 | 427 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.054 |
| 249 | Thalipasi | 14 | 428 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 250 | Thalipasi | 14 | 429 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.020 |
| 251 | Thalipasi | 14 | 430 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.017 |
| 252 | Thalipasi | 14 | 431 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.076 |
| 253 | Thalipasi | 14 | 432 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 254 | Thalipasi | 14 | 433 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.026 |
| Sahoo and Others | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 255 | Thalipasi | 14 | 434 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 256 | Thalipasi | 14 | 436 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.001 |
| 257 | Thalipasi | 14 | 437 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.005 |
| 258 | Thalipasi | 14 | 472 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.009 |
| 259 | Thalipasi | 14 | 473 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.022 |
| 260 | Thalipasi | 14 | 474 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.006 |
| 261 | Thalipasi | 14 | 475 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.026 |
| 262 | Thalipasi | 14 | 476 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.012 |
| 263 | Thalipasi | 14 | 477 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.043 |
| 264 | Thalipasi | 14 | 478 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.013 |
| 265 | Thalipasi | 14 | 479 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.019 |
| 266 | Thalipasi | 14 | 480 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.016 |
| 267 | Thalipasi | 14 | 481 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.021 |
| 268 | Thalipasi | 14 | 482 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.024 |
| 269 | Thalipasi | 14 | 483 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Gharabari | 0.056 |
| 270 | Thalipasi | 18 | 495 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 271 | Thalipasi | 46/10 | 500 | Digambar Sahu S/o Ratnakar Sahu | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.047 |
| 272 | Thalipasi | 2 | 501 | Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 273 | Thalipasi | 3 | 502 | Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 274 | Thalipasi | 42 | 503 | Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.055 |
| 275 | Thalipasi | 3 | 510 | Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.126 |
| 276 | Thalipasi | 2 | 511 | Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.111 |
| 277 | Thalipasi | 42 | 512 | Mahan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.062 |
| 278 | Thalipasi | 40 | 513 | Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 279 | Thalipasi | 23 | 514 | Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 280 | Thalipasi | 3 | 515 | Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.063 |
| 281 | Thalipasi | 2 | 516 | Uchhab Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 282 | Thalipasi | 12 | 522 | Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.190 |
| 283 | Thalipasi | 18 | 523 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.080 |
| 284 | Thalipasi | 18 | 524 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.086 |
| 285 | Thalipasi | 18 | 525 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.088 |
| 286 | Thalipasi | 18 | 526 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.050 |
| 287 | Thalipasi | 18 | 527 | Nandakishor Sahoo S/o Shyam Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.058 |
| 288 | Thalipasi | 12 | 528 | Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.080 |
| 289 | Thalipasi | 23 | 529 | Prakash Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 290 | Thalipasi | 40 | 530 | Madan Sahoo S/o Kuhuru Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 291 | Thalipasi | 3 | 531 | Kamara Sahoo S/o Kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.040 |
| 292 | Thalipasi | 2 | 532 | Uchhab Sahoo S/o kalyan Sahoo | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 293 | Thalipasi | 11 | 533 | Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.024 |
| 294 | Thalipasi | 11 | 534 | Gobardhan Sahoo S/o Anadi Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 295 | Thalipasi | 24 | 535 | Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 296 | Thalipasi | 24 | 536 | Prakash Sahoo S/o.kuhur Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 297 | Thalipasi | 10 | 539 | Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.070 |
| 298 | Thalipasi | 10 | 540 | Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.051 |
| 299 | Thalipasi | 10 | 543 | Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.169 |
| 300 | Thalipasi | 10 | 544 | Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.171 |
| 301 | Thalipasi | 10 | 548 | Guji Pradhan S/o Panu pradhan and others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.044 |
| 302 | Thalipasi | 14 | 549 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.050 |
| 303 | Thalipasi | 20 | 550 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.018 |
| 304 | Thalipasi | 14 | 551 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Patita | 0.096 |
| 305 | Thalipasi | 20 | 552 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.036 |
| 306 | Thalipasi | 20 | 553 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.015 |
| 307 | Thalipasi | 14 | 561 | Dasarathi Sahoo S/o Padmalavo Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Do Fasali | 0.001 |
| 308 | Thalipasi | 20 | 569 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 309 | Thalipasi | 20 | 570 | Nuhura Sahoo S/o Maguni Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.216 |
| 310 | Thalipasi | 46/5 | 576 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu | Taila | 0.487 |
| 311 | Thalipasi | 46/5 | 577 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu | Taila | 0.140 |
| 312 | Thalipasi | 46/5 | 578 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan sahu | Patita | 0.013 |
| 313 | Thalipasi | 30 | 579 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others | Gharabari | 0.132 |
| 314 | Thalipasi | 30 | 580 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Jadunath Pradhan and Others | Gharabari | 0.121 |
| 315 | Thalipasi | 46/7 | 581 | Manoj Kumar Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan | Taila | 0.028 |
| 316 | Thalipasi | 46/8 | 582 | Kumuda Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan | Taila | 0.046 |
| 317 | Thalipasi | 46/9 | 583 | Chabila Kumar Pradhan S/o Balukeswar Pradhan | Taila | 0.039 |
| Total : | Village- Thalipasi | 20.555 | ||||
| 1 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 6 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 1.150 |
| 2 | Bimbadharpur | 16 | 7 | Nisamani Sadangi W/o. Balkrishna Sadangi | Taila | 0.387 |
| 3 | Bimbadharpur | 16 | 8 | Nisamani Sadangi W/o. Balkrishna Sadangi | Taila | 0.419 |
| 4 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 12 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.147 |
| 5 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 13 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.157 |
| 6 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 14 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.456 |
| 7 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 15 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.132 |
| 8 | Bimbadharpur | 29 | 16 | Saroj Naik S/o Sardar Naik and Others | Taila | 0.104 |
| 9 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 18 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.274 |
| 10 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 20 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.226 |
| 11 | Bimbadharpur | 34/5 | 21 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.146 |
| 12 | Bimbadharpur | 34/34 | 22 | Sisir Kumar Behera S/o Kalia Behera | Taila | 0.139 |
| 13 | Bimbadharpur | 10 | 23 | Trinath Naik S/o. Beda Naik and Others | Taila | 0.056 |
| 14 | Bimbadharpur | 7 | 29 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others | Taila | 0.113 |
| 15 | Bimbadharpur | 7 | 30 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others | Taila | 0.232 |
| 16 | Bimbadharpur | 27 | 31 | Ratana Naik S/o Kalia Naik and Others | Taila | 0.584 |
| 17 | Bimbadharpur | 20 | 32 | Bikala Bagh S/o. Mulia Bagh and Others | Taila | 0.505 |
| 18 | Bimbadharpur | 34/9 | 33 | Uma Naik W/o. Kalyan Naik | Taila | 0.515 |
| 19 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 39 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 20 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 40 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 21 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 41 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 22 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 44 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 23 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 45 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 24 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 46 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.020 |
| 25 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 47 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.091 |
| 26 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 48 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 27 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 49 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.063 |
| 28 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 50 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.084 |
| 29 | Bimbadharpur | 17 | 51 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahinha Sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.082 |
| 30 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 52 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.079 |
| 31 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 53 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.069 |
| Jogendra sahu and Others | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 32 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 54 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 33 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 55 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 34 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 56 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 35 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 57 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.032 |
| 36 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 58 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.057 |
| 37 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 59 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 38 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 60 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.274 |
| 39 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 61 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.123 |
| 40 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 62 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.121 |
| 41 | Bimbadharpur | 34/8 | 63 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan sahu | Taila | 0.279 |
| 42 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 64 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.105 |
| 43 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 65 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.106 |
| 44 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 66 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.109 |
| 45 | Bimbadharpur | 8 | 67 | Jadu Pradhan S/o Arakhita Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.401 |
| 46 | Bimbadharpur | 1 | 78 | Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan | Taila | 0.079 |
| 47 | Bimbadharpur | 1 | 80 | Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.130 |
| 48 | Bimbadharpur | 1 | 81 | Kapil Pradhan S/o. Suna pradhan | Taila | 0.270 |
| 49 | Bimbadharpur | 31 | 82 | Srinibas Naik S/o Balaka Naik | Taila | 0.308 |
| 50 | Bimbadharpur | 34/17 | 83 | Saroj Kumar Behera S/o Ragunath Behera and Others | Taila | 0.220 |
| 51 | Bimbadharpur | 7 | 84 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishtam Naik and Others | Taila | 0.157 |
| 52 | Bimbadharpur | 34/7 | 105 | Satyanarayana Sahu S/o. Bhajaman Sahu | Taila | 0.342 |
| 53 | Bimbadharpur | 14 | 106 | Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.119 |
| 54 | Bimbadharpur | 14 | 107 | Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.180 |
| 55 | Bimbadharpur | 14 | 108 | Durjodhana Sahu S/o.Pathani Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.136 |
| 56 | Bimbadharpur | 26 | 114 | Maheswar Sahu S/o. Dasarathi Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.517 |
| 57 | Bimbadharpur | 30 | 116 | Sarangadhar Sahu S/o Banguru Sahu | Taila | 0.294 |
| 58 | Bimbadharpur | 9 | 121 | Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.288 |
| 59 | Bimbadharpur | 34 | 123 | Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others | Taila | 0.222 |
| 60 | Bimbadharpur | 34 | 128 | Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.220 |
| 61 | Bimbadharpur | 34 | 129 | Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 62 | Bimbadharpur | 34 | 130 | Hrudanand Dehury S/o Kathi Dehury and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 63 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 131 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.188 |
| 64 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 132 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Taila | 0.163 |
| 65 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 133 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.064 |
| 66 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 134 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.016 |
| 67 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 135 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.071 |
| 68 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 136 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 69 | Bimbadharpur | 5 | 137 | Khita Bagha S/o Kairu Bagha | Taila | 0.434 |
| 70 | Bimbadharpur | 3 | 139 | Kishori Pradhan S/o. Nata Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.614 |
| 71 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 150 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.060 |
| 72 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 151 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.045 |
| 73 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 152 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.061 |
| 74 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 153 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.037 |
| 75 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 154 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.030 |
| 76 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 156 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.322 |
| 77 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 157 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.104 |
| 78 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 158 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.130 |
| 79 | Bimbadharpur | 33 | 159 | Hatua Behera S/o Madan Behera and Others | Taila | 0.160 |
| 80 | Bimbadharpur | 19 | 160 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and others | Taila | 1.238 |
| 81 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 166 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.726 |
| 82 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 168 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.095 |
| 83 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 169 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.085 |
| 84 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 173 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 85 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 174 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 86 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 175 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.099 |
| 87 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 176 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.124 |
| 88 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 177 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 89 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 178 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 90 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 179 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.018 |
| 91 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 180 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 92 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 181 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.026 |
| 93 | Bimbadharpur | 25 | 182 | Bhaji Pradhan S/o Kanthia pradhan | Taila | 0.062 |
| 94 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 183 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.087 |
| 95 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 184 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.077 |
| 96 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 185 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Taila | 0.076 |
| 97 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 186 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.100 |
| 98 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 187 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.121 |
| 99 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 188 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.075 |
| 100 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 189 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.072 |
| 101 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 190 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.090 |
| 102 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 191 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.100 |
| 103 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 192 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.091 |
| 104 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 193 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.113 |
| 105 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 194 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.133 |
| 106 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 195 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Taila | 0.214 |
| 107 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 196 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.008 |
| 108 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 197 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 109 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 198 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.050 |
| 110 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 199 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.046 |
| 111 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 200 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.046 |
| 112 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 201 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 113 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 202 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 114 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 203 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.072 |
| 115 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 204 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 116 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 205 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 117 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 206 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.069 |
| 118 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 207 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 119 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 208 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 120 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 209 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 121 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 210 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 122 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 211 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.083 |
| 123 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 212 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.049 |
| 124 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 213 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.036 |
| 125 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 214 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 126 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 215 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 127 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 216 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 128 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 217 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 129 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 218 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 130 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 219 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.021 |
| 131 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 220 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.024 |
| 132 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 221 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 133 | Bimbadharpur | 22 | 222 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Narana Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.060 |
| 134 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 223 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 135 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 224 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 136 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 225 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.423 |
| 137 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 226 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 138 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 227 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 139 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 228 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.037 |
| 140 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 229 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.031 |
| 141 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 230 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 142 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 231 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 143 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 232 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 144 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 233 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 145 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 234 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 146 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 235 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.032 |
| 147 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 236 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.035 |
| 148 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 237 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.153 |
| 149 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 238 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 150 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 239 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 151 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 240 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 152 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 241 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.035 |
| 153 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 242 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.140 |
| 154 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 243 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.143 |
| 155 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 244 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.137 |
| 156 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 245 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.118 |
| 157 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 246 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.116 |
| 158 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 247 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.111 |
| 159 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 248 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.115 |
| 160 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 249 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.047 |
| 161 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 250 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.047 |
| 162 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 251 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 163 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 252 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.082 |
| 164 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 253 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.074 |
| 165 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 254 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.069 |
| 166 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 255 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.111 |
| Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 167 | Bimbadharpur | 34/21 | 256 | Janak Dehury S/o Mulia Dehury | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.120 |
| 168 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 257 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.249 |
| 169 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 258 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.059 |
| 170 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 259 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.015 |
| 171 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 260 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.009 |
| 172 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 261 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.016 |
| 173 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 262 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.018 |
| 174 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 263 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.053 |
| 175 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 264 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.041 |
| 176 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 265 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.227 |
| 177 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 266 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.087 |
| 178 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 267 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.101 |
| 179 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 268 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.115 |
| 180 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 269 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.105 |
| 181 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 270 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.070 |
| 182 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 271 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.038 |
| 183 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 272 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.091 |
| 184 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 273 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.098 |
| 185 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 274 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.092 |
| 186 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 275 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.070 |
| 187 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 276 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.107 |
| 188 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 277 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.024 |
| 189 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 278 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.025 |
| 190 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 279 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha | Sarada Jalasachita | 0.023 |
| Pradhan and Others | Ek Fasali | |||||
| 191 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 280 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.078 |
| 192 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 281 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 193 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 282 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 194 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 283 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.019 |
| 195 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 284 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.023 |
| 196 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 285 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.039 |
| 197 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 286 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.033 |
| 198 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 287 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 199 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 288 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.049 |
| 200 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 289 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 201 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 290 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 202 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 291 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.052 |
| 203 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 292 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 204 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 293 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.015 |
| 205 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 294 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.018 |
| 206 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 295 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 207 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 296 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.020 |
| 208 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 297 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.107 |
| 209 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 298 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.110 |
| 210 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 299 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.110 |
| 211 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 300 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.062 |
| 212 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 301 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.093 |
| 213 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 302 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.067 |
| 214 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 303 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.051 |
| 215 | Bimbadharpur | 11 | 304 | Tripura Pradhan S/o Janaka pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.160 |
| 216 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 305 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.035 |
| 217 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 306 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.129 |
| 218 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 307 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.165 |
| 219 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 308 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.159 |
| 220 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 309 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.158 |
| 221 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 312 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.049 |
| 222 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 313 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.056 |
| 223 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 314 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.040 |
| 224 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 315 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.045 |
| 225 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 316 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.040 |
| 226 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 317 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.043 |
| 227 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 318 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.041 |
| 228 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 319 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.026 |
| 229 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 320 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.057 |
| 230 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 321 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.037 |
| 231 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 322 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.037 |
| 232 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 323 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.039 |
| 233 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 324 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.081 |
| 234 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 325 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.078 |
| 235 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 326 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.070 |
| 236 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 327 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Taila | 0.210 |
| 237 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 328 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.171 |
| 238 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 333 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Taila | 0.161 |
| 239 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 334 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.123 |
| 240 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 335 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.056 |
| 241 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 336 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.119 |
| 242 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 337 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.179 |
| 243 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 338 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.171 |
| 244 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 339 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.114 |
| 245 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 340 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.086 |
| 246 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 341 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 247 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 342 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.028 |
| 248 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 343 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 249 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 344 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.022 |
| 250 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 345 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.044 |
| 251 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 346 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.034 |
| 252 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 347 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 253 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 348 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 254 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 349 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 255 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 350 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.029 |
| 256 | Bimbadharpur | 6 | 351 | GopalChandra Pradhan S/o Benudhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.051 |
| 257 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 352 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Taila | 0.112 |
| 258 | Bimbadharpur | 9 | 353 | Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan | Taila | 0.146 |
| 259 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 354 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 260 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 355 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.065 |
| 261 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 356 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.027 |
| 262 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 357 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.076 |
| 263 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 358 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.071 |
| 264 | Bimbadharpur | 23 | 359 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o Nityanand Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.099 |
| 265 | Bimbadharpur | 9 | 360 | Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.013 |
| 266 | Bimbadharpur | 9 | 361 | Damburu Pradhan, S/o.Nityananda Pradhan | Taila | 0.049 |
| 267 | Bimbadharpur | 15 | 366 | Nakofodi Pradhan S/o Sahadeb Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.065 |
| 268 | Bimbadharpur | 24 | 367 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o. Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.394 |
| 269 | Bimbadharpur | 24 | 368 | Baishnab Pradhan S/o. Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.022 |
| 270 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 369 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Taila | 0.277 |
| 271 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 370 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Taila | 0.079 |
| 272 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 371 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Taila | 0.066 |
| 273 | Bimbadharpur | 4 | 372 | Khiramohan Sahu S/o Jogendra sahu and Others | Taila | 0.158 |
| 274 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 377 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.172 |
| 275 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 378 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.203 |
| 276 | Bimbadharpur | 21 | 379 | Bira pradhan, S/o.Gouranga Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.048 |
| 277 | Bimbadharpur | 18 | 381 | Balabhadra Pradhan S/o Maguni pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.403 |
| 278 | Bimbadharpur | 2 | 382 | Kandur Pradhan S/o Kandha Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.308 |
| 279 | Bimbadharpur | 34/5 | 395 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.769 |
| 280 | Bimbadharpur | 34/2 | 396 | Bholaswar Sahu S/o Baguru Sahu | Taila | 0.362 |
| 281 | Bimbadharpur | 34/4 | 397 | Binodini Rauta W/o Vaishnab Rauta | Taila | 0.320 |
| 282 | Bimbadharpur | 34/6 | 398 | Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.345 |
| 283 | Bimbadharpur | 34/8 | 399 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan sahu | Taila | 0.240 |
| 284 | Bimbadharpur | 34/11 | 401 | Gandharba Naik S/o Kurtartha Naik | Taila | 0.267 |
| 285 | Bimbadharpur | 34/11 | 402 | Gandharba Naik S/o Kurtartha Naik | Taila | 0.151 |
| 286 | Bimbadharpur | 34/12 | 403 | Ranjan Kumar Behera S/o Kandarpa Behera | Taila | 0.159 |
| 287 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 404 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.051 |
| 288 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 405 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.053 |
| 289 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 406 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.038 |
| 290 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 407 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.029 |
| 291 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 408 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.040 |
| 292 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 409 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.081 |
| 293 | Bimbadharpur | 34/10 | 410 | Srimanta Kumar Sahu S/o. Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.110 |
| 294 | Bimbadharpur | 34/13 | 411 | Arun Kumar Naik S/o Harihara Naik | Taila | 0.090 |
| 295 | Bimbadharpur | 34/14 | 412 | Sabita Sahu W/o Jagabandhu Sahu | Taila | 0.055 |
| 296 | Bimbadharpur | 34/15 | 413 | Hatakisora Pradhan S/o Dayanidhi Pradhan | Taila | 0.019 |
| 297 | Bimbadharpur | 34/16 | 414 | Sanatana Baga S/o Khiti Baga | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.077 |
| 298 | Bimbadharpur | 34/18 | 415 | Sarathi Sahu S/o Goura Sahu | Taila | 0.038 |
| 299 | Bimbadharpur | 34/19 | 416 | Bhagabat Sahu S/o Bala Sahu | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.016 |
| 300 | Bimbadharpur | 34/20 | 417 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.116 |
| 301 | Bimbadharpur | 34/22 | 418 | Dharmendra Sahu S/o Rabindra Sahu | Taila | 0.108 |
| 302 | Bimbadharpur | 34/23 | 419 | Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Raj Sahu | Taila | 0.062 |
| 303 | Bimbadharpur | 34/24 | 420 | Ranjita Pradhan S/o Haramohan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.011 |
| 304 | Bimbadharpur | 34/24 | 421 | Ranjita Pradhan S/o Haramohan Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.014 |
| 305 | Bimbadharpur | 34/25 | 422 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.183 |
| 306 | Bimbadharpur | 34/25 | 423 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.106 |
| 307 | Bimbadharpur | 34/25 | 424 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.044 |
| 308 | Bimbadharpur | 34/28 | 425 | Tukuna Naik S/o Dilaswar Naik | Taila | 0.047 |
| 309 | Bimbadharpur | 34/26 | 426 | Praful Kumar Sethi S/o Bauribandhu Sethi | Taila | 0.049 |
| 310 | Bimbadharpur | 34/27 | 427 | Kuntala Behera W/o Sachidananda Behera | Taila | 0.033 |
| 311 | Bimbadharpur | 34/29 | 428 | Binapani Pradhan W/o Kalpaswar Sahu | Taila | 0.179 |
| 312 | Bimbadharpur | 34/30 | 429 | Gangadhar Baga S/o Bikal Baga | Taila | 0.017 |
| 313 | Bimbadharpur | 34/31 | 430 | Dharanidhar Baga S/o Bikal Baga | Taila | 0.017 |
| 314 | Bimbadharpur | 34/32 | 431 | Sulochana Mahakuda W/o Bidyadhar Mahakuda | Taila | 0.020 |
| 315 | Bimbadharpur | 34/33 | 432 | Rebati Rauta W/o TanuChandra Rauta | Taila | 0.020 |
| Total : | Village – Bimbadharpur | 35.724 | ||||
| 1 | Kudapasi | 114/27 | 3 | Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.291 |
| 2 | Kudapasi | 12 | 4 | Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik | Taila | 0.279 |
| 3 | Kudapasi | 111 | 6 | Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy | Taila | 0.181 |
| 4 | Kudapasi | 111 | 7 | Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy | Taila | 0.072 |
| 5 | Kudapasi | 111 | 8 | Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy | Taila | 0.105 |
| 6 | Kudapasi | 111 | 9 | Sudam Sethy S/o Bashu Sethy | Taila | 0.122 |
| 7 | Kudapasi | 107 | 23 | Shriram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy | Taila | 0.088 |
| 8 | Kudapasi | 94 | 41 | Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.123 |
| 9 | Kudapasi | 94 | 42 | Ruma Majhi D/o Bhagaban Majhi | Taila | 1.011 |
| 10 | Kudapasi | 102 | 43 | Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.161 |
| 11 | Kudapasi | 102 | 44 | Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.107 |
| 12 | Kudapasi | 102 | 45 | Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.081 |
| 13 | Kudapasi | 102 | 46 | Shyamaghana Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Patita | 0.043 |
| 14 | Kudapasi | 68 | 48 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | patita | 0.032 |
| 15 | Kudapasi | 68 | 49 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.086 |
| 16 | Kudapasi | 68 | 50 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 17 | Kudapasi | 68 | 51 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.040 |
| 18 | Kudapasi | 68 | 57 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 19 | Kudapasi | 68 | 58 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 20 | Kudapasi | 68 | 59 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 21 | Kudapasi | 68 | 60 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.028 |
| 22 | Kudapasi | 68 | 61 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.026 |
| 23 | Kudapasi | 68 | 64 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.057 |
| 24 | Kudapasi | 68 | 65 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.026 |
| 25 | Kudapasi | 68 | 66 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.068 |
| 26 | Kudapasi | 68 | 67 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Patita | 0.052 |
| 27 | Kudapasi | 68 | 76 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.038 |
| 28 | Kudapasi | 68 | 77 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.082 |
| 29 | Kudapasi | 68 | 78 | Fakira Majhi S/o Bhagaban Majhi | Patita | 0.145 |
| 30 | Kudapasi | 16 | 79 | Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.695 |
| 31 | Kudapasi | 16 | 80 | Khageswar Mahji S/o Bagaban Majhi | Taila | 0.227 |
| 32 | Kudapasi | 77 | 81 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Taila | 0.308 |
| 33 | Kudapasi | 50 | 83 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Taila | 0.307 |
| 34 | Kudapasi | 114 | 84 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Taila | 0.315 |
| 35 | Kudapasi | 66 | 98 | Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Taila | 0.071 |
| 36 | Kudapasi | 66 | 99 | Pranabandhu Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Taila | 0.101 |
| 37 | Kudapasi | 114/27 | 103 | Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.420 |
| 38 | Kudapasi | 40 | 104 | Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu | Taila | 0.282 |
| 39 | Kudapasi | 13 | 107 | Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu | Taila | 0.080 |
| 40 | Kudapasi | 40 | 109 | Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu | Taila | 0.205 |
| 41 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 115 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.275 |
| 42 | Kudapasi | 114/40 | 116 | Manmohan Pradhan S/o Gadadhar Pradhan | Taila | 0.046 |
| 43 | Kudapasi | 114/8 | 117 | Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik | Taila | 0.085 |
| 44 | Kudapasi | 87 | 122 | Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.075 |
| 45 | Kudapasi | 87 | 123 | Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.157 |
| 46 | Kudapasi | 87 | 125 | Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu | Taila | 0.164 |
| 47 | Kudapasi | 87 | 126 | Mahan Shau S/o Kuhuru Sahu | Taila | 0.143 |
| 48 | Kudapasi | 72 | 128 | Balram Majhi S/o Chaitanya Majhi and Others | Taila | 0.175 |
| 49 | Kudapasi | 73 | 133 | Basudev Sahu S/o Nanda Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.449 |
| 50 | Kudapasi | 43 | 136 | Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu | Taila | 0.100 |
| 51 | Kudapasi | 25 | 137 | Choudhary Sahu S/o Nityananda Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.164 |
| 52 | Kudapasi | 43 | 138 | Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu | Taila | 0.083 |
| 53 | Kudapasi | 30 | 142 | Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and Others | Taila | 0.527 |
| 54 | Kudapasi | 30 | 143 | Jogi Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi and Others | Taila | 0.048 |
| 55 | Kudapasi | 84 | 144 | Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi and Others | Taila | 0.420 |
| 56 | Kudapasi | 81 | 166 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.756 |
| 57 | Kudapasi | 39 | 179 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.216 |
| 58 | Kudapasi | 39 | 180 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.024 |
| 59 | Kudapasi | 39 | 181 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.009 |
| 60 | Kudapasi | 39 | 182 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.131 |
| 61 | Kudapasi | 39 | 183 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.009 |
| 62 | Kudapasi | 39 | 184 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.177 |
| 63 | Kudapasi | 39 | 185 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Bagayat Dei | 0.062 |
| 64 | Kudapasi | 39 | 187 | Nakaphodi Pradhan S/o Saheb Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.043 |
| 65 | Kudapasi | 79 | 189 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.030 |
| 66 | Kudapasi | 79 | 190 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.045 |
| 67 | Kudapasi | 79 | 191 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.017 |
| 68 | Kudapasi | 79 | 192 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.017 |
| 69 | Kudapasi | 79 | 194 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.383 |
| 70 | Kudapasi | 79 | 195 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.197 |
| 71 | Kudapasi | 79 | 196 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.169 |
| 72 | Kudapasi | 75 | 197 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.018 |
| 73 | Kudapasi | 79 | 198 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.014 |
| 74 | Kudapasi | 79 | 199 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.014 |
| 75 | Kudapasi | 79 | 200 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.206 |
| 76 | Kudapasi | 79 | 201 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.315 |
| 77 | Kudapasi | 79 | 202 | Benudhar Pradhan S/o Naran Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.675 |
| 78 | Kudapasi | 23 | 204 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.016 |
| 79 | Kudapasi | 114/65 | 206 | Biswanath Sethi S/o Kailash Sethi | Taila | 0.145 |
| 80 | Kudapasi | 1 | 215 | Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.232 |
| 81 | Kudapasi | 75 | 222 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.040 |
| 82 | Kudapasi | 74 | 224 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.042 |
| 83 | Kudapasi | 74 | 225 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.137 |
| 84 | Kudapasi | 75 | 226 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.061 |
| 85 | Kudapasi | 75 | 227 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.195 |
| 86 | Kudapasi | 75 | 229 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.030 |
| 87 | Kudapasi | 75 | 231 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.031 |
| 88 | Kudapasi | 75 | 232 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.113 |
| 89 | Kudapasi | 75 | 233 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.016 |
| 90 | Kudapasi | 75 | 234 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.066 |
| 91 | Kudapasi | 81 | 235 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.040 |
| 92 | Kudapasi | 81 | 236 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.039 |
| 93 | Kudapasi | 75 | 237 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.044 |
| 94 | Kudapasi | 81 | 240 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.045 |
| 95 | Kudapasi | 81 | 241 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.020 |
| 96 | Kudapasi | 81 | 242 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda | Sarada | 0.150 |
| Pradhan and Others | Anajalasachita Tini | |||||
| 97 | Kudapasi | 81 | 243 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.008 |
| 98 | Kudapasi | 81 | 244 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.086 |
| 99 | Kudapasi | 81 | 245 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.098 |
| 100 | Kudapasi | 81 | 246 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.012 |
| 101 | Kudapasi | 81 | 247 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.010 |
| 102 | Kudapasi | 81 | 248 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.072 |
| 103 | Kudapasi | 81 | 249 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.079 |
| 104 | Kudapasi | 81 | 253 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.116 |
| 105 | Kudapasi | 81 | 254 | Baishnaba Pradhan S/o Nityananda Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.025 |
| 106 | Kudapasi | 75 | 260 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.181 |
| 107 | Kudapasi | 75 | 263 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.151 |
| 108 | Kudapasi | 75 | 265 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.013 |
| 109 | Kudapasi | 75 | 266 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Patita | 0.012 |
| 110 | Kudapasi | 75 | 267 | Bikram Pradhan S/o Bansidhar Pradhan and Others | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.160 |
| 111 | Kudapasi | 47 | 273 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.228 |
| 112 | Kudapasi | 47 | 274 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.233 |
| 113 | Kudapasi | 47 | 275 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.247 |
| 114 | Kudapasi | 47 | 276 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.075 |
| 115 | Kudapasi | 47 | 277 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.132 |
| 116 | Kudapasi | 47 | 278 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.106 |
| 117 | Kudapasi | 47 | 279 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.283 |
| 118 | Kudapasi | 47 | 280 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.285 |
| 119 | Kudapasi | 47 | 281 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.028 |
| 120 | Kudapasi | 47 | 282 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.019 |
| 121 | Kudapasi | 54 | 283 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.091 |
| 122 | Kudapasi | 54 | 284 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.080 |
| 123 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 289 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.021 |
| 124 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 290 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.022 |
| 125 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 291 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.046 |
| 126 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 292 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Taila | 0.011 |
| 127 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 293 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.010 |
| 128 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 295 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Taila | 0.007 |
| 129 | Kudapasi | 54 | 297 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.065 |
| 130 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 298 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.030 |
| 131 | Kudapasi | 54 | 299 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.027 |
| 132 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 300 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.014 |
| 133 | Kudapasi | 54 | 301 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.029 |
| 134 | Kudapasi | 54 | 302 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.089 |
| 135 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 303 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.037 |
| 136 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 304 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.042 |
| 137 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 305 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.098 |
| 138 | Kudapasi | 54 | 306 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Dei | 0.033 |
| 139 | Kudapasi | 54 | 307 | Padia Sahu S/o Nahia Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.044 |
| 140 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 309 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.107 |
| 141 | Kudapasi | 114/86 | 317 | Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.036 |
| 142 | Kudapasi | 114/86 | 318 | Rathi Sethi S/o Aanand Sethi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.016 |
| 143 | Kudapasi | 114/73 | 319 | Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik | Patita | 0.053 |
| 144 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 320 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.255 |
| 145 | Kudapasi | 47 | 347 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.043 |
| 146 | Kudapasi | 47 | 348 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.106 |
| 147 | Kudapasi | 47 | 349 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and | Sarada | 0.230 |
| Others | Anajalasachita Tini | |||||
| 148 | Kudapasi | 47 | 350 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.065 |
| 149 | Kudapasi | 47 | 351 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.186 |
| 150 | Kudapasi | 47 | 352 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.018 |
| 151 | Kudapasi | 47 | 353 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.157 |
| 152 | Kudapasi | 47 | 354 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.143 |
| 153 | Kudapasi | 47 | 355 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.040 |
| 154 | Kudapasi | 47 | 356 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.121 |
| 155 | Kudapasi | 47 | 357 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.029 |
| 156 | Kudapasi | 47 | 358 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.127 |
| 157 | Kudapasi | 47 | 359 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.028 |
| 158 | Kudapasi | 47 | 360 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.116 |
| 159 | Kudapasi | 47 | 361 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.121 |
| 160 | Kudapasi | 114/24 | 364 | Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout | Taila | 0.155 |
| 161 | Kudapasi | 114/24 | 365 | Baishnab Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout | Taila | 0.126 |
| 162 | Kudapasi | 99 | 367 | Sarthi Pradhan S/o Siba pradhan | Taila | 0.182 |
| 163 | Kudapasi | 46 | 370 | Nuhura Sahu S/o Maguni sahu | Taila | 0.259 |
| 164 | Kudapasi | 114/79 | 371 | Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Gaura Chandra Sahu | Taila | 0.082 |
| 165 | Kudapasi | 88 | 375 | Mahi Dehury S/o Ram Dehury | Taila | 0.101 |
| 166 | Kudapasi | 10 | 377 | Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury and Others | Taila | 0.114 |
| 167 | Kudapasi | 10 | 378 | Kalpataru Dehury S/o Ram Dehury and Others | Taila | 0.319 |
| 168 | Kudapasi | 114/29 | 379 | Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam Mallick | Taila | 0.251 |
| 169 | Kudapasi | 58 | 380 | Palau Sahu S/o Natabar Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.397 |
| 170 | Kudapasi | 23 | 381 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.233 |
| 171 | Kudapasi | 57 | 382 | Palau Sahu S/o Nata Sahu | Taila | 0.211 |
| 172 | Kudapasi | 28 | 386 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.049 |
| 173 | Kudapasi | 28 | 387 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.081 |
| 174 | Kudapasi | 28 | 388 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.201 |
| 175 | Kudapasi | 28 | 389 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.207 |
| 176 | Kudapasi | 28 | 390 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.051 |
| 177 | Kudapasi | 28 | 391 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.067 |
| 178 | Kudapasi | 28 | 392 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.102 |
| 179 | Kudapasi | 28 | 393 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.099 |
| 180 | Kudapasi | 29 | 395 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others | Taila | 0.110 |
| 181 | Kudapasi | 29 | 396 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others | Taila | 0.193 |
| 182 | Kudapasi | 29 | 397 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others | Taila | 0.050 |
| 183 | Kudapasi | 28 | 398 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari | Taila | 0.046 |
| 184 | Kudapasi | 29 | 400 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others | Taila | 0.109 |
| 185 | Kudapasi | 29 | 401 | Jangali Matiari S/o Lakhi Dhar Matiari and Others | Taila | 0.089 |
| 186 | Kudapasi | 114/42 | 402 | Pradip Pradhan S/o Trilochan Pradhan | Taila | 0.097 |
| 187 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 404 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.164 |
| 188 | Kudapasi | 24 | 405 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.176 |
| 189 | Kudapasi | 24 | 406 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.081 |
| 190 | Kudapasi | 24 | 407 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.038 |
| 191 | Kudapasi | 71 | 408 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.031 |
| 192 | Kudapasi | 71 | 409 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.016 |
| 193 | Kudapasi | 71 | 410 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.019 |
| 194 | Kudapasi | 24 | 411 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.040 |
| 195 | Kudapasi | 24 | 412 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.070 |
| 196 | Kudapasi | 24 | 413 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.029 |
| 197 | Kudapasi | 24 | 414 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.064 |
| 198 | Kudapasi | 24 | 415 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.087 |
| 199 | Kudapasi | 24 | 416 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.059 |
| 200 | Kudapasi | 71 | 417 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.057 |
| 201 | Kudapasi | 71 | 418 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.043 |
| 202 | Kudapasi | 11 | 420 | Kalandi Shau S/o Sadhaba Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.229 |
| 203 | Kudapasi | 70 | 421 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.156 |
| 204 | Kudapasi | 70 | 422 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu | Patita | 0.020 |
| 205 | Kudapasi | 70 | 423 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.160 |
| 206 | Kudapasi | 70 | 424 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni sahu | Patita | 0.027 |
| 207 | Kudapasi | 114/27 | 425 | Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.056 |
| 208 | Kudapasi | 114/27 | 426 | Srimata kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.162 |
| 209 | Kudapasi | 12 | 427 | Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik | Taila | 0.149 |
| 210 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 428 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.035 |
| 211 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 429 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.032 |
| 212 | Kudapasi | 53 | 430 | Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna Naik | Taila | 0.064 |
| 213 | Kudapasi | 12 | 431 | Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.062 |
| 214 | Kudapasi | 12 | 432 | Kulamani Naik S/o Bairagi Naik | Taila | 0.053 |
| 215 | Kudapasi | 114/48 | 434 | Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Taila | 0.018 |
| 216 | Kudapasi | 114/50 | 435 | Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna Sahu | Taila | 0.037 |
| 217 | Kudapasi | 71 | 437 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.355 |
| 218 | Kudapasi | 71 | 438 | Banabihari Sahu S/o Maguni Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.065 |
| 219 | Kudapasi | 114/48 | 439 | Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Taila | 0.056 |
| 220 | Kudapasi | 114/48 | 440 | Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Taila | 0.036 |
| 221 | Kudapasi | 114/50 | 441 | Pradeep Sahu S/o Jayakrishna Sahu | Taila | 0.070 |
| 222 | Kudapasi | 114/49 | 442 | Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu | Taila | 0.032 |
| 223 | Kudapasi | 114/49 | 443 | Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu | Taila | 0.023 |
| 224 | Kudapasi | 114/49 | 444 | Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu | Taila | 0.045 |
| 225 | Kudapasi | 114/49 | 445 | Khitis Chandra Sahu S/o Jayakishna Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.029 |
| 226 | Kudapasi | 114/45 | 446 | Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.041 |
| 227 | Kudapasi | 109 | 447 | Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.023 |
| 228 | Kudapasi | 109 | 448 | Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.025 |
| 229 | Kudapasi | 109 | 449 | Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.015 |
| 230 | Kudapasi | 109 | 450 | Sukhila Sahu S/o Baira Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.021 |
| 231 | Kudapasi | 43 | 452 | Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.041 |
| 232 | Kudapasi | 43 | 453 | Nilamani Sahu S/o Hari sahu | Taila | 0.018 |
| 233 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 454 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.050 |
| 234 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 499 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.018 |
| 235 | Kudapasi | 108 | 500 | Sukanti Naik W/o Chaitanya Naik | Taila | 0.141 |
| 236 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 501 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.022 |
| 237 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 502 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.037 |
| 238 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 503 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.053 |
| 239 | Kudapasi | 24 | 504 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnav Naik and Others | Taila | 0.061 |
| 240 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 505 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.058 |
| 241 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 506 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.040 |
| 242 | Kudapasi | 114/43 | 507 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.072 |
| 243 | Kudapasi | 52 | 531 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.050 |
| 244 | Kudapasi | 52 | 532 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.077 |
| 245 | Kudapasi | 52 | 533 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.014 |
| 246 | Kudapasi | 52 | 534 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.062 |
| 247 | Kudapasi | 52 | 535 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.103 |
| 248 | Kudapasi | 52 | 536 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.119 |
| 249 | Kudapasi | 52 | 537 | Pathani Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Patita | 0.025 |
| 250 | Kudapasi | 114/48 | 538 | Dhirendra Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.025 |
| 251 | Kudapasi | 114/45 | 539 | Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.070 |
| 252 | Kudapasi | 50 | 540 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.039 |
| 253 | Kudapasi | 77 | 541 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.018 |
| 254 | Kudapasi | 77 | 542 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.018 |
| 255 | Kudapasi | 77 | 543 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.009 |
| 256 | Kudapasi | 50 | 544 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.011 |
| 257 | Kudapasi | 95 | 545 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.012 |
| 258 | Kudapasi | 50 | 546 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.015 |
| 259 | Kudapasi | 50 | 547 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.012 |
| 260 | Kudapasi | 95 | 548 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 261 | Kudapasi | 95 | 549 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.022 |
| 262 | Kudapasi | 50 | 550 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.084 |
| 263 | Kudapasi | 77 | 551 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.081 |
| 264 | Kudapasi | 114 | 552 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.027 |
| 265 | Kudapasi | 50 | 553 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.035 |
| 266 | Kudapasi | 114/26 | 554 | Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.020 |
| 267 | Kudapasi | 61 | 555 | Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.094 |
| 268 | Kudapasi | 77 | 556 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.097 |
| 269 | Kudapasi | 114 | 557 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.132 |
| 270 | Kudapasi | 77 | 558 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.044 |
| 271 | Kudapasi | 114 | 559 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.013 |
| 272 | Kudapasi | 114 | 560 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.027 |
| 273 | Kudapasi | 61 | 561 | Pradeshi Majhi S/o Nimei Majhi and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.041 |
| 274 | Kudapasi | 114 | 562 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.036 |
| 275 | Kudapasi | 77 | 563 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.034 |
| 276 | Kudapasi | 114 | 564 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.046 |
| 277 | Kudapasi | 77 | 565 | Bira Sahu S/o Ganga Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.094 |
| 278 | Kudapasi | 50 | 566 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.077 |
| 279 | Kudapasi | 50 | 567 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.060 |
| 280 | Kudapasi | 50 | 568 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.016 |
| 281 | Kudapasi | 50 | 569 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.016 |
| 282 | Kudapasi | 50 | 570 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.011 |
| 283 | Kudapasi | 50 | 571 | Panchu Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.021 |
| 284 | Kudapasi | 95 | 572 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.032 |
| 285 | Kudapasi | 95 | 573 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.016 |
| 286 | Kudapasi | 114/26 | 574 | Dhobei Sahu S/o Hadibandhu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.020 |
| 287 | Kudapasi | 95 | 575 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.036 |
| 288 | Kudapasi | 95 | 576 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.122 |
| 289 | Kudapasi | 95 | 577 | Laxmi Sahu D/o Kastu Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.007 |
| 290 | Kudapasi | 80 | 582 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.055 |
| 291 | Kudapasi | 80 | 583 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Patita | 0.036 |
| 292 | Kudapasi | 80 | 584 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.148 |
| 293 | Kudapasi | 80 | 585 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.027 |
| 294 | Kudapasi | 80 | 586 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.031 |
| 295 | Kudapasi | 80 | 587 | Bairagi Sahu S/o Budhiya Sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.035 |
| 296 | Kudapasi | 17 | 594 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.052 |
| 297 | Kudapasi | 4 | 595 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.025 |
| 298 | Kudapasi | 4 | 596 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.053 |
| 299 | Kudapasi | 4 | 597 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.059 |
| 300 | Kudapasi | 4 | 598 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.048 |
| 301 | Kudapasi | 17 | 599 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.091 |
| 302 | Kudapasi | 17 | 606 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.058 |
| 303 | Kudapasi | 17 | 607 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.039 |
| 304 | Kudapasi | 4 | 616 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.040 |
| 305 | Kudapasi | 17 | 617 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.031 |
| 306 | Kudapasi | 22 | 618 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Taila | 0.031 |
| 307 | Kudapasi | 22 | 619 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.072 |
| 308 | Kudapasi | 22 | 620 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.034 |
| 309 | Kudapasi | 114 | 621 | Hadi Sahu S/o Gangadhar Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.090 |
| 310 | Kudapasi | 17 | 622 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.093 |
| 311 | Kudapasi | 4 | 623 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.072 |
| 312 | Kudapasi | 22 | 624 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Taila | 0.018 |
| 313 | Kudapasi | 22 | 625 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Taila | 0.019 |
| 314 | Kudapasi | 17 | 626 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.022 |
| 315 | Kudapasi | 17 | 627 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu Sahu | Taila | 0.030 |
| 316 | Kudapasi | 4 | 628 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.022 |
| 317 | Kudapasi | 18 | 629 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.049 |
| 318 | Kudapasi | 18 | 630 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.018 |
| 319 | Kudapasi | 18 | 632 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.045 |
| 320 | Kudapasi | 33 | 633 | Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu | Taila | 0.072 |
| 321 | Kudapasi | 65 | 637 | Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu | Taila | 0.119 |
| 322 | Kudapasi | 18 | 638 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.035 |
| 323 | Kudapasi | 18 | 639 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.066 |
| 324 | Kudapasi | 18 | 640 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.064 |
| 325 | Kudapasi | 18 | 641 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.070 |
| 326 | Kudapasi | 18 | 642 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.011 |
| 327 | Kudapasi | 18 | 643 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.012 |
| 328 | Kudapasi | 18 | 644 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.011 |
| 329 | Kudapasi | 18 | 645 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.008 |
| 330 | Kudapasi | 18 | 646 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.028 |
| 331 | Kudapasi | 18 | 647 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.013 |
| 332 | Kudapasi | 18 | 648 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.025 |
| 333 | Kudapasi | 18 | 649 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.031 |
| 334 | Kudapasi | 18 | 650 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Taila | 0.059 |
| 335 | Kudapasi | 18 | 651 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.042 |
| 336 | Kudapasi | 18 | 652 | Khira Sahu S/o Raghu sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.043 |
| 337 | Kudapasi | 65 | 659 | Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.127 |
| 338 | Kudapasi | 65 | 660 | Paluni Sahu W/o Mohan Sahu | Taila | 0.097 |
| 339 | Kudapasi | 33 | 661 | Dukhia Sahu S/o Mahan Sahu | Taila | 0.109 |
| 340 | Kudapasi | 113 | 671 | Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji | Patita | 0.042 |
| 341 | Kudapasi | 113 | 672 | Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.040 |
| 342 | Kudapasi | 64 | 674 | Prahalad sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Taila | 0.445 |
| 343 | Kudapasi | 114/82 | 675 | Surendra Chandra mali S/o Nilay mali | Taila | 0.167 |
| 344 | Kudapasi | 32 | 676 | Dahana Naik S/o Chandal Naik | Taila | 0.387 |
| 345 | Kudapasi | 92 | 682 | Rasananda Sahu S/o Buddhia Majhi and Others | Taila | 0.090 |
| 346 | Kudapasi | 113 | 686 | Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji | Taila | 0.115 |
| 347 | Kudapasi | 113 | 688 | Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.174 |
| 348 | Kudapasi | 113 | 689 | Hari Mahji S/o Duari Mahji | Taila | 0.020 |
| 349 | Kudapasi | 78 | 692 | Budhia Sahu S/o Anand Sahu | Taila | 0.001 |
| 350 | Kudapasi | 4 | 738 | Indra shau S/o Bagawan Sahu | Taila | 0.023 |
| 351 | Kudapasi | 22 | 739 | Chandra Sahu S/o Bhagaban Sahu | Taila | 0.031 |
| 352 | Kudapasi | 15 | 955 | Keshab Sahu S/o Jagei sahu and Others | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.011 |
| 353 | Kudapasi | 114/31 | 956 | Bhaghirathi Behera S/o Nabaghana Behera | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.001 |
| 354 | Kudapasi | 97 | 1227 | Lochan Sahu S/o Jadu Sahu | Taila | 0.184 |
| 355 | Kudapasi | 53 | 1233 | Patitapaban Naik S/o Jaykrushna Naik | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.040 |
| 356 | Kudapasi | 103 | 1234 | Srinibas Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.247 |
| 357 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1235 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.337 |
| 358 | Kudapasi | 1 | 1236 | Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.241 |
| 359 | Kudapasi | 114/71 | 1237 | Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.320 |
| 360 | Kudapasi | 114/25 | 1238 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.161 |
| 361 | Kudapasi | 67 | 1239 | Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.147 |
| 362 | Kudapasi | 67 | 1240 | Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.102 |
| 363 | Kudapasi | 67 | 1243 | Pitambar Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.015 |
| 364 | Kudapasi | 114/84 | 1244 | Satyabhama Sethi W/o Ghanashyam Sethi | Taila | 0.082 |
| 365 | Kudapasi | 1 | 1246 | Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.132 |
| 366 | Kudapasi | 1 | 1247 | Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.031 |
| 367 | Kudapasi | 1 | 1248 | Abhiram Naik S/o Balak Naik | Taila | 0.230 |
| 368 | Kudapasi | 5 | 1249 | Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and Others | Taila | 0.158 |
| 369 | Kudapasi | 114/41 | 1250 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik | Taila | 0.088 |
| 370 | Kudapasi | 5 | 1251 | Uchhaba Naik S/o Balak Naik and Others | Taila | 0.075 |
| 371 | Kudapasi | 114/18 | 1253 | Manorajan Naik S/o Chaitanya Naik | Taila | 0.091 |
| 372 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1254 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.036 |
| 373 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1255 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.057 |
| 374 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1256 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.193 |
| 375 | Kudapasi | 13 | 1258 | Keshaba Sahu S/o Kungei Sahu | Taila | 0.206 |
| 376 | Kudapasi | 89 | 1259 | Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu | Taila | 0.074 |
| 377 | Kudapasi | 89 | 1260 | Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu | Taila | 0.094 |
| 378 | Kudapasi | 40 | 1261 | Nalu sahu S/o Bauri sahu | Taila | 0.164 |
| 379 | Kudapasi | 114/29 | 1262 | Jogendra Mallick S/o Narottam Mallick | Taila | 0.350 |
| 380 | Kudapasi | 114/69 | 1263 | Durga Charan nayak S/o Patitapawan Nayak | Gharabari | 0.025 |
| 381 | Kudapasi | 93 | 1265 | Ram Sethy S/o Dukhu Sethy | Gharabari | 0.020 |
| 382 | Kudapasi | 63 | 1266 | Prahlad Majhi S/o Bauri Majhi | Gharabari | 0.022 |
| 383 | Kudapasi | 86 | 1268 | Bholeswar Sahu S/o Banguru Sahu | Gharabari | 0.020 |
| 384 | Kudapasi | 42 | 1269 | Niranjan Majhi S/o Bira Majhi | Gharabari | 0.017 |
| 385 | Kudapasi | 41 | 1271 | Nimei Majhi S/o Thaka Majhi | Gharabari | 0.020 |
| 386 | Kudapasi | 114/77 | 1272 | Bhallabh Chandra Pradhan S/o Haldhar Pradhan | Gharabari | 0.019 |
| 387 | Kudapasi | 6 | 1274 | Kastu Bagha S/o Kamar Bagha | Gharabari | 0.015 |
| 388 | Kudapasi | 96 | 1275 | Lachhaman Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Gharabari | 0.018 |
| 389 | Kudapasi | 90 | 1277 | Ramesh Naik S/o Kalia Naik | Gharabari | 0.017 |
| 390 | Kudapasi | 35 | 1282 | Dolagovinda Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu | Gharabari | 0.020 |
| 391 | Kudapasi | 89 | 1284 | Ramesh Sahu S/o Nabei Sahu | Gharabari | 0.019 |
| 392 | Kudapasi | 114/22 | 1286 | Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik | Gharabari | 0.015 |
| 393 | Kudapasi | 114/37 | 1288 | Kaushalya Behera W/o Sujit Behera | Gharabari | 0.016 |
| 394 | Kudapasi | 55 | 1291 | Pabitra Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu | Gharabari | 0.014 |
| 395 | Kudapasi | 34 | 1293 | Duruju Sahu S/o Pathani Sahu | Gharabari | 0.012 |
| 396 | Kudapasi | 98 | 1295 | Sarbeswar Matiari S/o Laxmi Dhar Matiari | Gharabari | 0.021 |
| 397 | Kudapasi | 112 | 1297 | Sushant Pradhan S/o Nimei Pradhan and Others | Gharabari | 0.018 |
| 398 | Kudapasi | 114/6 | 1300 | Chitanya Naik S/o Vishnaba Naik | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.123 |
| 399 | Kudapasi | 114/7 | 1301 | Khiroda Kumar Maharana S/o Jatia Maharana | Taila | 0.081 |
| 400 | Kudapasi | 114/8 | 1302 | Panchali Barik W/o Prabhat Kiran Barik | Taila | 0.061 |
| 401 | Kudapasi | 114/41 | 1303 | Chaitanya Naik S/o Baishnab Naik | Taila | 0.090 |
| 402 | Kudapasi | 114/11 | 1304 | Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Taila | 0.138 |
| 403 | Kudapasi | 114/11 | 1305 | Dharmapada Sahu S/o Panchu Sahu | Taila | 0.114 |
| 404 | Kudapasi | 114/12 | 1306 | Patitapaban Naik S/o Jayakrushna Naik | Taila | 0.081 |
| 405 | Kudapasi | 114/13 | 1307 | Manmohan Sahu S/o Sukru Sahu | Taila | 0.057 |
| 406 | Kudapasi | 114/16 | 1308 | Hadibandhu Sahu S/o Ekadusia Sahu | Taila | 0.045 |
| 407 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1309 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.231 |
| 408 | Kudapasi | 114/30 | 1314 | Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra Rauta | Taila | 0.093 |
| 409 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1316 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.164 |
| 410 | Kudapasi | 114/33 | 1317 | Srimanta kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.129 |
| 411 | Kudapasi | 114/30 | 1318 | Vishnaba Rauta S/o Purna Chandra Rauta | Taila | 0.201 |
| 412 | Kudapasi | 114/34 | 1319 | Pramila Naik S/o Kirtan Naik | Taila | 0.237 |
| 413 | Kudapasi | 114/38 | 1320 | Binod Kumar Sahu S/o Madhusudhan Sahu | Taila | 0.090 |
| 414 | Kudapasi | 114/19 | 1321 | Ganya ranjan Naik S/o Chitanya Naik | Taila | 0.158 |
| 415 | Kudapasi | 114/39 | 1322 | Alok Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu | Taila | 0.066 |
| 416 | Kudapasi | 114/45 | 1324 | Managovinda Sahu S/o Durjyadhana Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.036 |
| 417 | Kudapasi | 114/46 | 1325 | Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.049 |
| 418 | Kudapasi | 114/46 | 1326 | Narayana Sahu S/o Pranabandhu Sahu | Taila | 0.017 |
| 419 | Kudapasi | 114/47 | 1327 | Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Taila | 0.010 |
| 420 | Kudapasi | 114/47 | 1328 | Sibarama Sahu S/o Pabitra Sahu | Taila | 0.005 |
| 421 | Kudapasi | 114/51 | 1329 | Sasmitarani Pradhan W/o Umakant Majhi | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.184 |
| 422 | Kudapasi | 114/53 | 1330 | Rasmita Sahu W/o Pradip Kumar Pradhan | Taila | 0.074 |
| 423 | Kudapasi | 114/54 | 1331 | Ajit Kumar Dehuri S/o Duryadhan Dehuri | Taila | 0.045 |
| 424 | Kudapasi | 114/57 | 1333 | Pitabas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu | Taila | 0.049 |
| 425 | Kudapasi | 114/58 | 1334 | Sarathi Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu | Taila | 0.046 |
| 426 | Kudapasi | 114/59 | 1335 | Srinibas Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu | Taila | 0.048 |
| 427 | Kudapasi | 114/60 | 1336 | Surath Sahu S/o Gaura Sahu | Taila | 0.038 |
| 428 | Kudapasi | 114/61 | 1337 | Rakesh Ranjan Rauta S/o Prafful Kumar Rauta | Taila | 0.101 |
| 429 | Kudapasi | 114/63 | 1338 | Rajkishor Dehuri S/o Maheswar Dehuri | Taila | 0.159 |
| 430 | Kudapasi | 114/81 | 1339 | Prasant Kumar Sahu S/o Netrananda Sahu | Taila | 0.120 |
| 431 | Kudapasi | 114/64 | 1340 | Santwona Mishra W/o Narendra Kumar Mishra | Taila | 0.048 |
| 432 | Kudapasi | 114/66 | 1341 | Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu | Taila | 0.056 |
| 433 | Kudapasi | 114/66 | 1342 | Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu | Taila | 0.018 |
| 434 | Kudapasi | 114/66 | 1343 | Deba Sahu S/o Budhia Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.060 |
| 435 | Kudapasi | 114/67 | 1344 | Chinmaya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera | Taila | 0.159 |
| 436 | Kudapasi | 114/68 | 1345 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera | Taila | 0.119 |
| 437 | Kudapasi | 114/68 | 1346 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera | Taila | 0.014 |
| 438 | Kudapasi | 114/68 | 1347 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera | Taila | 0.067 |
| 439 | Kudapasi | 114/70 | 1348 | Susant Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu | Taila | 0.035 |
| 440 | Kudapasi | 114/39 | 1349 | Alok Kumar Sahu S/o Rudramohan Sahu | Taila | 0.042 |
| 441 | Kudapasi | 114/73 | 1350 | Sarojini Naik W/o Ajya Naik | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.015 |
| 442 | Kudapasi | 114/74 | 1351 | Tikan Sahu S/o Dujyadhan Sahu | Taila | 0.111 |
| 443 | Kudapasi | 114/75 | 1352 | Tuna Behera S/o Prakash Behera | Taila | 0.096 |
| 444 | Kudapasi | 114/76 | 1353 | Binya Kumar Behera S/o Susant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.385 |
| 445 | Kudapasi | 114/78 | 1354 | Arun Pradhan S/o Mohan Pradhan | Taila | 0.105 |
| 446 | Kudapasi | 114/85 | 1356 | Karunakar Mahapatra S/o Chandramani Mahapatra | Taila | 0.097 |
| 447 | Kudapasi | 84 | 1357 | Bhagirathi Majhi S/o Bira Majhi and Others | Gharabari | 0.011 |
| 448 | Kudapasi | 114/87 | 1358 | Satyananda Pradhan S/o Ghanashyama Pradhan and Others | Taila | 0.125 |
| 449 | Kudapasi | 114/88 | 1359 | Uddhab Sahu S/o Narottam Sahu | Sarada Anajalasachita Tini | 0.009 |
| 450 | Kudapasi | 114/89 | 1360 | Ranjan Behera S/o Ramesh Behera | Taila | 0.036 |
| 451 | Kudapasi | 114/90 | 1361 | Rajat Kumar Behera S/o Ramesh Behera | Taila | 0.035 |
| Total : | Village – Kudapasi | 42.488 | ||||
| 1 | Dhaurakhaman | 11 | 5 | Ghurudu Sahu S/o Butu Sahu | Taila | 0.441 |
| 2 | Dhaurakhaman | 43 | 10 | Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi | Taila | 0.237 |
| 3 | Dhaurakhaman | 43 | 11 | Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi | Taila | 0.340 |
| 4 | Dhaurakhaman | 43 | 12 | Sudaie Sethi S/o Nanda Sethi | Taila | 0.194 |
| 5 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/17 | 13 | Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain | Taila | 0.771 |
| 6 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 15 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.748 |
| 7 | Dhaurakhaman | 8 | 16 | Kasturi Sahu S/o Arkhita Dehuri and Others | Taila | 0.071 |
| 8 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/19 | 17 | Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout | Taila | 0.149 |
| 9 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/19 | 18 | Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout | Taila | 0.121 |
| 10 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/42 | 20 | Sudarshan Dehuri S/o Dangi Dehuri | Taila | 0.375 |
| 11 | Dhaurakhaman | 24 | 21 | Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.358 |
| 12 | Dhaurakhaman | 28 | 40 | Bairagi Sahu D/o Sabar Sahu | Taila | 0.479 |
| 13 | Dhaurakhaman | 24 | 53 | Balakrishna Sahu S/o Bhagabat Sahu and Others | Taila | 1.637 |
| 14 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 54 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.022 |
| 15 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/17 | 84 | Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain | Taila | 0.267 |
| 16 | Dhaurakhaman | 35 | 85 | Milu Behera S/o Haldhar behera | Taila | 0.072 |
| 17 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/45 | 86 | Prafulla Kumar Sethi S/o Bauri Bandhu Sethi | Taila | 0.101 |
| 18 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/41 | 87 | Vinay Kumar Behera S/o Sushant Kumar Behera and Others | Taila | 0.307 |
| 19 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 92 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.622 |
| 20 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 93 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.065 |
| 21 | Dhaurakhaman | 2 | 94 | Antaryami Sahu S/o Dhani Sahu | Taila | 0.079 |
| 22 | Dhaurakhaman | 20 | 98 | Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu | Taila | 0.136 |
| 23 | Dhaurakhaman | 22 | 99 | Bauribandhu Dehuri s/o Panu Dehuri | Taila | 0.101 |
| 24 | Dhaurakhaman | 20 | 103 | Punia Sahu D/o Damburu Sahu | Taila | 0.170 |
| 25 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/17 | 104 | Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain | Taila | 0.245 |
| 26 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/50 | 105 | Vishnu Behera S/o Deenbandhu Behera | Taila | 0.039 |
| 27 | Dhaurakhaman | 14 | 224 | Jay Krishna Pradhan S/o Daitari Pradhan | Sarada Jalasachita Ek Fasali | 0.153 |
| 28 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/2 | 563 | Bhagirati Sahoo S/o Nepala Sahoo and Others | Taila | 0.037 |
| 29 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/3 | 566 | Pranati Barik W/o Narayana Barik | Taila | 0.096 |
| 30 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/4 | 567 | Pravati Barik W/o Akhya Kumar Barik | Taila | 0.036 |
| 31 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/8 | 571 | Pravat Kiran Barik S/o Anukul Barik | Taila | 0.036 |
| 32 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/11 | 574 | Panchali Barik W/o Pravat Kiran Barik | Taila | 0.026 |
| 33 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 575 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.347 |
| 34 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 578 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.521 |
| 35 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/12 | 579 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.129 |
| 36 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/13 | 580 | Binodini Rauta W/o Vishnaba Rauta | Taila | 0.151 |
| 37 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/14 | 581 | Basant Kumar Sahu S/o Bidyadhar Sahu | Taila | 0.049 |
| 38 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/15 | 582 | Tikili Behera W/o Dambaru Behera | Taila | 0.142 |
| 39 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/17 | 584 | Manas Ranjan Swain S/o Prahlad Swain | Taila | 0.343 |
| 40 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/19 | 587 | Baisnaba Rout S/o Purna Chandra Rout | Taila | 0.120 |
| 41 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/21 | 588 | Village community land in the name of President, Brahmanbil. | Taila | 0.595 |
| 42 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/23 | 589 | Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.102 |
| 43 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/23 | 590 | Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.194 |
| 44 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/23 | 591 | Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.101 |
| 45 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/23 | 592 | Srimant Kumar Sahu S/o Bishnu Charan Sahu | Taila | 0.194 |
| 46 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/29 | 598 | Dipendu Kumar Pradhan S/o Jadumani Pradhan | Taila | 0.114 |
| 47 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/31 | 600 | Dhirendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bhask Sahu and Others | Taila | 0.440 |
| 48 | Dhaurakhaman | 45/49 | 612 | Diptirani Barik W/o Barun Kumar Barik | Taila | 0.024 |
| Total: | Village - Dhaurakhaman | 12.099 |
Boundary Description: The Naini Coal Block Boundary starts from Point No.1 which is located by the side of State Highway No. 63 and on the south bank of Gauduni Nala. Whence the boundary moves forward in South-East direction along the State Highway No.63 (towards Angul Town) up to point No.29. From point No.29 to Point No.136 the boundary takes left turn towards North-East direction, moving across the CHHENDIPADA RF and to reach point No.136, located on the R F boundary. From Point No.136 to Point No.A the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200. From Point No.A to Point No. C the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No.36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17. From Point No.C to Point No.E the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547, 546. From Point No.E to Point No.I the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through Survey. No. 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to Point No.30 the boundary moved further North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the boundary takes left turn towards North-West direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey. No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.35 the boundary further moved in North- West direction across the CHHENDIPADA RF to meet the Point No.35 located on the RF boundary. From Point No.35 to point No.1 the Boundary takes left turn towards South-West direction along the south bank of Gauduni Nala towards upstream and closed at Point No.1 whence the boundary started. (1) Village: TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.136, A and B. The village boundary line starts from Point No.136, which is situated close to the tri-junction point, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary and block boundary at Survey No.195. From Point No.136 to Point No. A, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR passing through Survey No.195, 194, 193, 201, 200 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.200. From Point No.A to Point No.B the village boundary moved in North-East direction covering the Survey No.200, 199, 195 and touching the Chhendipada RF boundary at Point No.B. From Point No.B to Point No.136 it is common boundary between TENTULOI GOPINATHAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF. (2) Village: KASIDIHA: Boundary bounded by Point No. A, C, D, and B. The village boundary line starts from Point No. A, which is situated at common point for Survey No.36 and Survey No.34. From Point No.A to Point No.C, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KASIDIHA passing through Survey No. 36, 34, 33, 3092, 32, 30, 24, 23, 20, 17 touching the village boundary at North- East end at Survey No.17. From point No.C to Point No.D the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 3176, 5 and passing through tri-junction point, and moved along Survey No. 2, 1, touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.D. From point No.D to Point No.B it is a common boundary between KASIDIHA village and CHHENDIPADA RF. The village boundary from Point No.B to Point No.A moves in South-West direction covering the Survey No.1, 30, 31, 32, 36 and closing the boundary at Point No.A. (3) Village: THALIPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. C, E, F, G and D. The village boundary line starts from Point No. C, which is situated at Survey No.20. From Point No.C to Point No.E, the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village THALIPASI passing through Survey No.20, 19, 18, 66, 68, 64, 63, 52, 119, 120, 229, 233, 234, 237, 238, 241, 242, 245, 247, 250, 437, 436, 432, 433, 434, 449, 471, 472, 476, 561, 551, 552, 553, 550, 548, 547 and 546 touching the village boundary at North-East end at Survey No.546. From point No.E to Point No.F the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.546, 545, 542, 541, 538, 537, 536, 533, 532, 531, 530, 528, 527, 526, 525, 524, 523. From point No.F to Point No.G the village boundary moved in West direction covering Survey No.510, 509, 498, 414, 413, 412, 411, 410, 409, 408, 407, 406, 403,2678 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 402, 401, 119, 96, 93, 89, 86, 85, and 1 touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point. No.G. From Point No.G to Point No.D it is common boundary between THALIPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.D to Point No.C the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 3, 578, 577, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and closing the boundary at Point No. C. (4) Village: BIMBADHARAPUR : Boundary bounded by Point No.G, F and H. The village boundary line starts from Point No.G which is close to tri-junction point and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF BOUNDARY. From Point No.G to Point No.F the village boundary moved in East direction covering the Survey No. 1, 162, 163, 164, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 367, 368, 369, 370, 372, 373, 378, 379. From Point No.F to Point No.H the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.387, 379, 378, 377, 376, 375, 364, tri-junction point, 363, 362, 353, 415, 412, 352, 47, 44, 34, 392, 399, 33, 389, 430, 32, 19, 17, 4 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.H. From Point No.H to Point No.G it is common boundary between BIMBADHARAPUR village and CHHENDIPADA RF closing the boundary at Point No.G. (5) Village: KUDAPASI : Boundary bounded by Point No. E, I, J, H and F. The village boundary line starts from Point No.E, which is situated close to the tri-junction point at Survey No.678. From Point No.E to Point No.I the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village KUDAPASI passing through Survey No.678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 685, 686, 687, 689, 692, 691, 635, 634, 633, 632, 631, 737, 741, 769, 809, 807, 802, 803, 797, 796, 795, 784, 955, 956, 531, 530, 529, 527, 523, 499, 500, 492, 467, 1224, 462, 461. From Point No.I to Point No.J the village boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No.461, tri- junction point, 393, 392, 391, 390, 389, 388, 1318, 380, 379, 365, 364, tri-junction point, 47, 46, 44, 1230, 1229, 1228, 27 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.J. From Point No.J to Point No.H it is common boundary between KUDAPASI village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.H to Point No.F and Point No.E. the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 1316, 1234, 1235, 1353, 1236, 1237, 1, 2, 112, 113, 127, 134, 1351, tri-junction point, 1351, 1307, 138, 1322, 139, 1223, 184, 185, tri-junction point, 186, 188, 202, 1309, 204, 673, 676, 677, 678 and closing the boundary at Point No.E. (6) Village: DHAURAKHAMAN: Boundary bounded by Point No. I, 30, 31 and J. The village boundary line starts from Point No.I, which is situated at Survey No.222. From Point No.I to Point No.30 the block boundary moved towards North-East direction across the village DHAURAKHAMAN passing through Survey No. 222, 223, 224, 226, 225, 213, 226, 257, 256, 255, 260, 268, 269. From Point No.30 to Point No.31 the block boundary moved in North-West direction covering the Survey No. 269, 268, 270, 266, 265, 262, 181, 180, 178, 179, 176, 105, 566, 567, 102, 85, 84, 54, 53, 21, 20 and touching the CHHENDIPADA RF boundary at Point No.31. From Point No.31 to Point No.J it is common boundary between DHAURAKHAMAN village and CHHENDIPADA RF. From Point No.J to Point No.I the village boundary moved in South-East direction covering the Survey No.1, 2, 4, 558, 551, 7, 553, 552, 553, 34, 35, 36, 37, tri-junction point, 90, 91, 92, 95, 200, tri-junction point, 201, 202, 203, 219, 220, 221, tri-junction point, 222, and closing the boundary at Point No.I.
[F. No. 43015/18/2015- LA & IR] RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 2 ebZ] 2019
dkdkdkdk----vkvkvkvk---- 656656656656----&&&&dsUnzh ljdkj dks ;g izrhr gksrk gS fd] blls mikc) vuqlwph esa mfYyf[kr ifj{ks= dh
Hkwfe esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr fd, tkus dh laHkkouk gS; vkSj] js[kkad la[;k ,lbZLkh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼ih,yth½@Hkwfe@527] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 dk ftlesa mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe {ks= ds C;kSjs vUrfoZ"V gS] fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkÅl LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NÙrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] iwoksZDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nsrh gSA mijksDr mfYyf[kr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrcn~/k dksbZ O;fDr & ¼i½ laiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k mlds Åij fdlh vf/kdkj ds vtZu ij vk{ksi dj
ldsxk( vFkok
¼ii½ mDr vf/klwpuk dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼3½ ds v/khu dh xbZ fdlh dk;ZokbZ ls gqbZ ;k lEHkor% gksus
okyh fdlh {kfr ds fy;s vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 ds v/khu izfrdj dk nkok dj ldsxk( vFkok
¼iii½ mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu iwosZ{k.k vuqKfIr;ksa ds izHkkoghu gksus ds laca/k esa ;k mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼4½ ds v/khu [kuu iV~Vs izHkkoghu gksus ds fy;s izfrdj dk[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2679 nkok dj ldsxk vkSj mls mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds [kaM ¼i½ ls ¼iv½ esa fofufnZ"V enksa dh Ckkcr mixr O;; dks minf'kZr djus ds fy;s iwoksZDr Hkwfe ls lacaf/kr lHkh ekufp=ksa] pkVksZ vkSj vU; nLrkostksa dks ifjnRr dj ldsxk]
jkti= esa bl vf/klwpuk ds izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls uCcs fnu dh vof/k ds Hkhrj Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh ;k foHkkxk/;{k ¼jktLo½] lkÅFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] lhir jksM] fcykliqj&495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ dks lqiqnZ djsxk A
vuqlwphvuqlwphvuqlwphvuqlwph egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] egkek;k vkslhih foLrkj Cykd] HkVxkao {ks=] ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
| Øe la- | x zke dk uke | x zke la[;k | rglhy | ftyk | {ks= gsDVj es a | fVIif.k;k |
| 1- | tjgh | 103 | izrkiiqj | lqjtiqj | 16.410 | Hkkx |
| dqy % 16-410 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 40-55 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ |
fVIi.kfVIi.kfVIi.kfVIi.k %%%% xzke tjgh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd;s tkus okys IykV la[;k% 33(Hkkx), 37@2] 38@1] 38@2] 39 ls 47] 53 ls 58] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 66(Hkkx), 67 ls 75] 341(Hkkx), 342(Hkkx), 483(Hkkx) ls 485(Hkkx), 486@1] 486@2] 487] 488(Hkkx), 489(Hkkx), 490] 491(Hkkx), 492@1 ls 492@4] 493@1]493@2] 494 ls 497] 498(Hkkx), 500(Hkkx), 501] 507(Hkkx), 553@1(Hkkx), 553@2] 555(Hkkx), 556(Hkkx), 557] 564@1 lss 564@3] 566(Hkkx), 582(Hkkx), 583(Hkkx), 585(Hkkx), 589(Hkkx), 590(Hkkx), 591 ls 595] 596(Hkkx), 597(Hkkx), 618(Hkkx) ls 620(Hkkx), 621 ls 623] 624(Hkkx), 625(Hkkx), 637(Hkkx), 638(Hkkx), 741(Hkkx), 748(Hkkx), 749] 750(Hkkx), 751(Hkkx), 752 ls 755] 756(Hkkx), 757(Hkkx), 760(Hkkx), 772(Hkkx).
lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu%lhek o.kZu% Cykd & d%Cykd & d%Cykd & d%Cykd & d% d&[k js[kk fcUnq *d* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds if'peh Hkkx ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *[k* ij feyrh gSA [k&x js[kk fcUnq *[k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *x* ij feyrh gSA x&?k js[kk fcUnq *x* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *?k* ij feyrh gSA ?k&d js[kk fcUnq *?k* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *d* ij feyrh gSA
Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% Cykd & [k% ³&p js[kk fcUnq *³* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas mRrjh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *p* ij feyrh gSA p&N js[kk fcUnq *p* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas iwohZ fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *N* ij feyrh gSA N&t js[kk fcUnq *N* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas nf{k.kh fn'kk ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq *t* ij feyrh gSA t&³ js[kk fcUnq *t* ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh esas if'peh fn'kk ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq *³* ij feyrh gSA
[Qk- la- 43015@06@2019&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj] jke f'kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 2nd May, 2019
S.O. 656.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that coal is likely to be obtained from the lands in the locality mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto; And whereas, the plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/527, dated the 19th March, 2019 containing details of the area of land described in the said Schedule may be inspected at the office of the Collector, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata-700001 or at the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh). Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to prospect for coal in the land described in the aforesaid Schedule. Any person interested in the land described in the above mentioned Schedule may- (i) object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land; or2680 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (ii) claim compensation under section 6 of the said Act for any damage caused or likely to be caused by any action taken under sub -section (3) of section 4 of the said Act; or
(iii) claim compensation under sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act, in respect of prospecting license ceasing to have effect or under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the said Act for mining lease ceasing to have effect and deliver all maps, charts and other documents relating to the aforesaid land to show the expenditure incurred in respect of items specified in clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the said Act,
to the Officer-In-Charge or Head of the Department (Revenue), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur -495006 (Chhattisgarh) within a period of ninety days from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.
SCHEDULE
Mahamaya OCP Extension Block, Bhatgaon Area,
District- Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
| Sl. No. | Name of village | Village number | Tahsil | District | Area in hectares | Remarks |
| 1. | Jarhi | 103 | Pratappur | Surajpur | 16.410 | Part |
| Total: 16.410 hectares (approximately) or 40.55 acres (approximately) |
Note : Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jarhi (Part): 33(P), 37/2, 38/1, 38/2, 39 to 47, 53 to 58, 61(P), 62(P), 66(P), 67 to 75, 341(P), 342(P), 483(P) to 485(P), 486/1, 486/2, 487, 488(P), 489(P), 490, 491(P), 492/1 to 492/4, 493/1, 493/2, 494 to 497, 498(P), 500(P), 501, 507(P), 553/1(P), 553/2, 555(P), 556(P), 557, 564/1 to 564/3, 566(P), 582(P), 583(P), 585(P), 589(P), 590(P), 591 to 595, 596(P), 597(P), 618(P) to 620(P), 621 to 623, 624(P), 625(P), 637(P), 638(P), 741(P), 748(P), 749, 750(P), 751(P), 752 to 755, 756(P), 757(P), 760(P), 772(P).
Boundary description:
Block – A :
A-B Line starts from point 'A' and passes in village Jarhi through western part of village Jarhi and meets at point 'B'.
B-C Line starts from point 'B' and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at point 'C'.
C-D Line starts from point 'C' and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'D'.
D-A Line starts from point 'D' and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at starting point 'A'.
Block – B:
E-F Line starts from point 'E' and passes in village Jarhi towards northern direction of village Jarhi, and meets at point 'F'.
F-G Line starts from point 'F' and passes in village Jarhi towards eastern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'G'.
G-H Line starts from point 'G' and passes in village Jarhi towards southern direction of village Jarhi and meets at point 'H'.
H-E Line starts from point 'H' and passes in village Jarhi towards western direction of village Jarhi and meets at starting point 'E'.
[F. No. 43015/ 06 /2019-LA&IR ]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2681Je vkSj jkstxkj ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 657-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iwoZ mRrj jsyos izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 64@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&41012@84@2016&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019
S.O. 657.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 64/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of East North Railway and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-4-2019.
[No. L-41012/84/2016-IR(B-1)]
B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL–CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.
ID. No. 64 of 2017
Zonal Working President, Rail Sewak Sangh, Through Sri D.P. Awasthi, 49, Tilak Nagar, Lucknow.
Versus
The Divisional Personnel Officer, East North Railway, DRM Office, Ashok Marg, Lucknow.
AWARD
1. Central Government, MOL, New Delhi vide notification No. L-41012/84/2016-IR (B-I) dated 10.08.2017 has referred the following for Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"KYA PURVOTTAR RAIL PRASHASHAN LUCKNOW DWARA SRI RAKESH KUMAR,
HELPER KHALASI KO USKI JOINING TITHI ( 25.08.98)SE SC/ST QUOTA KE TAHAT
MILNE WALI PADONNATI NA DEKAR USSE JUNIOR KO PADONNATI DIYA JANA
TATHA NYAYOCHIT AVAM VAID HAI? YADI NAHI TO KAMGAR KIS RAHAT KO
PANE KA HAQDAR HAI?"
2. After receipt of reference order from Ministry of Labor and Employment, New Delhi registered notices dated 11.09.2017 were issued from this Tribunal to the parties for filing their respective claim and counter claim fixing 20.10.2017. But since Presiding Officer was on tour on 20.10.17, the case was adjourned to 19.01.18, still no claim petition was filed in the case on 19.01.2018. Again on 22.01.19, the case was taken up for hearing but when none appeared from the side of the contesting parties it was ordered that registered notices be issued to the contesting parties for filing of their claim and counter claim petition in the case on behalf of the worker, but both the parties were absent and no claim petition was filed in the instant case by the Union raising the dispute on behalf of the worker. The case was again listed for hearing on 03.04.2018, 01.05.2018, 25.07.18, 28.09.2018, 20.11.2018, 18.01.19, but surprisingly enough to note that despite giving repeated and reasonable opportunities to the Union for filing claim petition on behalf of the worker, neither any one appeared on behalf of the union/worker nor any claim petition was filed in the case.
3. Therefore, from the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is absolutely evident that neither the union raising the present dispute nor the workman is interested in prosecuting the present case. In the instant case2682 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] union/workers have been given sufficient opportunities to present their claim petition, but after availing of the adequate opportunities, workers / union have deliberately and willingly failed in discharging their legal obligation in filing claim petition on their behalf before the Tribunal.
4. Hence, it is abundantly clear that it is a case wherein neither pleadings have been filed by the contesting parties nor have any documentary evidence been filed on their behalf.
5. As such it is case of no pleading and no evidence; therefore, under these circumstances it is held that the union /workers are not entitled for any relief for want of pleadings and proof.
6. Reference is answered as above.
dated 08.04.2019
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 24 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 658-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14 ½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Js;l xzkeh.k cSad izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k dkuiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013, 101/2103, 43/2103, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2103, 47/2013, 84/2103, 138/2103, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014, 100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2103, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2103, 111/2014, 89/2103/2019) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 24-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch&I½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 24th April, 2019
S.O. 658.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2013, 109/2013, 79/2013, 97/2013, 86/2013, 83/2013, 42/2013, 101/2013, 43/2013, 90/2013, 85/2013, 87/2013, 47/2013, 84/2013, 138/2013, 139/2013, 81/2013, 96/2013, 83/2014, 100/2014, 99/2013, 98/2013, 88/2013, 95/2013, 82/2013, 111/2014, 89/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum- Labour Court Kanpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Shryas Gramin Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 24-04-2019.
[No. L-12012/13, 27, 38, 56, 39, 36, 15, 60, 28, 57, 40, 24, 42, 26, 97, 95, 37, 48, 38, 54, 59, 55, 29, 58, 41, 25, 23/2013-IR(B-1)]
B.S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SRI RAKESH KUMAR, HJS, PRESIDING OFFICER
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT, KANPUR.
1. Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 2013
Between
Sri Jagdish Singh, S/o Sri Rajendra Pal Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2683 Head Office Digg iRoad, Aligarh 202001.
AWARD
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/13/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagdish Singh son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
2. Industrial Dispute No. 109 of 2013
Between
Sri Udaiveer Singh, S/o Sri Babu Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/27/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Udaiveer Singh son of Sri Babu Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
3. Industrial Dispute No. 79 of 2013
Between
Sri Darshan Singh, S/o Sri Chunni Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/38/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Darshan Singh son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"2684 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
4. Industrial Dispute No. 97 of 2013
Between
Sri Sandeep Kumar, S/o Sri Mohan Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/56/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank, now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Sandeep Kumar son of Sri Mohan Lal workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
5. Industrial Dispute No. 86 of 2013
Between
Sri Jagveer Singh, S/o Sri Pokhpal Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/39/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Jagveer Singh son of Sri Pokhpal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
6. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2013
Between
Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain, S/o Sri Puttu Lal Jain, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2685
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/36/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pankaj Kumar Jain son of Sri Rajendra Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
7. Industrial Dispute No. 42 of 2013
Between
Sri Rakesh Kumar S/o Sri Roshan Lal, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/15/2013-IR(B-1) dated 28.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Rakesh Kumar son of Sri Roshan Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
8. Industrial Dispute No. 101 of 2013
Between
Sri Arvind Kumar, S/o Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 2260102686 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/60/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Arvind Kumar son of Sri Prabhu Dayal Saxena workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
9. Industrial Dispute No. 43 of 2013
Between
Sri Pushpendra Kumar s/o Sri Ramesh Chandra, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010 the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/28/2013-IR(B-1) dated 17.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Pushpendra Kumar son of Sri Ramesh Chandra workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
10. Industrial Dispute No. 90 of 2013
Between
Sri Pradeep Kumar Jain, s/o Sri Prem Chand Jain, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart. Head Office A-2/46, Vijai Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow 226010
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/57/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryawart in terminating the services of Sri Pradep Kumar Jain son of Sri Prem Chand Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2010 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2687
11. Industrial Dispute No. 85 of 2013
Between
Sri Amar Babu, s/o Sri Chunni Lal C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/40/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Amar Babu son of Sri Chunni Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
12 Industrial Dispute No. 87 of 2013
Between
Sri Roop Kishore, s/o Shri Krishan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/24/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Roop Kishore son of Shri Krishan workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
13. Industrial Dispute No. 84 of 2013
Between
Sri Satish Kumar, s/oVijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 2020012688 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/42/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Satish Kumar son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
14. Industrial Dispute No. 47 of 2013
Between
Sri Omveer Singh, s/o Late Mahendra Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/26/2013-IR(B-1) dated 20.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Omveer Singh son of late Mahendra Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?''
15. Industrial Dispute No. 138 of 2013
Between
Sri Ram Prakash, s/o Sri Ram Das, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/97/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2689''Whether the action of the management of Shryas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Ram Prakash son of Sri Ram Das workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
16. Industrial Dispute No. 139 of 2013
Between
Sri Raghvender Singh, s/o Sri Jai Pal Singh, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/95/2013-IR(B-1) dated 08.11.2013 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Raghvendra Singh son of Sri Jai Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
17. Industrial Dispute No. 81 of 2013
Between
Sri Manoj Kumar, s/o Sri Murari Lal, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh 202001.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/37/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Murari Lal workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"2690 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
18. Industrial Dispute No. 96 of 2013
Between
Sri Moharman Singh, s/o Sri Netra Pal Singh C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/48/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013 has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Moharman Singh son of Sri Netrapal Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
19. Industrial Dispute No. 83 of 2014
Between
Sri Kuldeep Singh, s/o Sri Umesh Singh C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification no. L-12012/38/2014-IR(B-1) dated 03.07.2014.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
20. Industrial Dispute No. 100 of 2014
Between
Sri Tarsem Kumar, s/o Sri Balak Ram, C/o Sri R P Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2691
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/54/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Rarsem son of Sri Balak Ram workman with effect from 01.01.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
21. Industrial Dispute No. 99 of 2013
Between
Sri Dinesh Kumar s/o Sri Pramod Kumar, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/59/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Dinesh Kumar son of Sri Pramod Kumar workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
22. Industrial Dispute No. 98 of 2013
Between
Sri Deepak Kumar, s/o Sri Brahman Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
2692 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/55/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
"Whether the action of the management of erstwhile Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Kuldeep Singh son of Sri Umesh Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
23. Industrial Dispute No. 88 of 2013
Between
Sri Manoj Kumar, s/o Sri Jaidev Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office, Diggi Road, Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/29/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Manoj Kumar son of Sri Jaidev Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
24. Industrial Dispute No. 95 of 2013
Between
Sri Narendra Pal Singh, s/o Sri Vijay Pal Singh C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/58/2013-IR(B-1) dated 25.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank now Gramin Bank of Aryavart in terminating the services of Sri Narendra Pal Singh son of Sri Vijay Pal Singh workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2693
25. Industrial Dispute No. 82 of 2013
Between
Sri Hariom Tatsath, S/o Sri Mahaver Singh, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office Diggi Road, Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/41/2013-IR(B-1) dated 18.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Hariom Tatsath son of Sri Mahaveer Singh workman with effect from 01.08.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
26. Industrial Dispute No. 111 of 2014
Between
Sri Ram Naresh, S/o Sri Ram Charan, C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 202001
And
The Chairman, Shreyas Gramin Bank, Head Office, Diggi Road, Aligarh.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/25/2013-IR(B-1) dated 31.05.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Ram Naresh son of Sri Ram Charan workman with effect from 01.07.2012 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?
27. Industrial Dispute No. 89 of 2013
Between
Sri Virendra Kumar Jain, S/o Sh. Raj Kumar Jain C/o Sri R. P. Singh, State Executive Committee Member, U.P. Bank Workers Organization, 3/13 Mathura Nagar, Aligarh (U.P.) 2020012694 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
And
The Chairman, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office A-2/46 Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
Central Government, Mol & Employment, vide notification No. L-12012/23/2013-IR(B-1) dated 04.06.2013.
has referred the following dispute for adjudication to this tribunal:
''Whether the action of the management of Shreyas Gramin Bank in terminating the services of Sri Virendra Kumar Jain son of Sri Raj Kumar Jain workman with effect from 01.01.2013 is just fair and legal? If not to what relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
28. As in all the above cases common question of facts and law is involved, therefore, all the cases were consolidated by order of the tribunal passed on 05.05.15 and Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 was made the leading case. Therefore the tribunal proposes to decide all the above cases by means of this common award.
29. The case number, name of worker, date of appointment, date of termination of service and the branch where they were posted are shown in the following chart which is as per facts mentioned by the concerned workmen in their claim petition:-
| SL. No. | ID No. | Name of worker | Date of appointment | Date of termination | Branch where was posted |
| 1 | 41/2013 | JAGDISH SINGH | 01-06-2007 | 01-08-2012 | SAKRAULI, DIST-ETAH |
| 2 | 86/2013 | JAGVEER SINGH | OCT 1999 | 01-08-2012 | ALIGANJ, DISTT- ETAH |
| 3 | 97/2013 | SANDEEP KUMAR | 01/01/2099 | 01/01/2013 | PATIALI GATE,DISTT-ETAH |
| 4 | 79/2013 | DARSHAN SINGH | JUNE 2005 | 01-08-2012 | JINHORA, UNDER ETAH GRAMNIN BANK |
| 5 | 109/2013 | UDAY VEER SINGH | 1999 | 01-08-2012 | ETAH CITY UNDER ETAH GRAMNIN BRANCH |
| 6. | 83/2013 | PANKAJ KR. JAIN | 1998 | 01-08-2012 | ISSUALI UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 7. | 42/2013 | RAKESH KUMAR | 2001 | 1-8-2012 | PIWARI UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 8. | 101/2013 | ARVIND KUMAR | 2001 | 01-01-2013 | JAITHRA UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 9 | 43/2013 | PUSHPENDRA KUMAR | 2006 | 01-08-2012 | PUNHERA , ETAH UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK |
| 10 | 99/2013 | DINESH KUMAR | 2006 | 01-01-2013 | AMRAULI RATANPUR(ETAH) UNDER GRAMIN BANK OF ARYAVART |
| 11. | 83/2014 | KULDEEP SINGH | JANUARY 2008 | 01-07-2012 | HATHODA (KASGANJ) UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK |
| 12. | 89/2013 | VIRENDRA KR. JAIN | 26-03-2010 | 01-01-2013 | JALESER CITIY UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK |
| 13. | 111/2013 | RAM NARESH | 10-08-1999 | 01-07-2012 | VIRAMPUR, UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 14. | 82/2013 | HARI OM TAD SAT | 1995 | 01-08-2012 | JALESHAR MAIN BRANCH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH |
| 15. | 95/2013 | NARENDRA PAL SINGH | 1990 | 01-07-2012 | SARAWAL UNDER ATTAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 16. | 88/2013 | MANOJ KUMAR | 1997 | 01-08-2012 | ETAH GRAMIN BANK, ATTAH |
| 17. | 98/2013 | DEEPAK KUMAR | 24-04-2K | 1-01-2013 | DARIYA GANJ, DIST- KASHGANJ UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 18. | 100/2013 | TARSEM KUMAR | 01-01-1992 | 01-01-2013 | RAJA KA RAM PUR (ETAH GRAMIN BANK) |
| 19. | 96/2013 | MOHAR MAN SINGH | NIL | 01-08-2012 | MALAWAN UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 20. | 81/2013 | MANOJ KUMAR | 1997 | 01-08-2012 | JALESHAR CITY UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 21 | 139/2013 | RAGHVENDRA SINGH | JANUARY 2010 | 01-01-2013 | PATIALI BRANCH UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK |
| 22 | 138/2013 | RAMPRAKASH | APRIL 1986 | 1-1-2013 | SIKAHRA UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 23. | 47/2013 | OM VEER SINGH | 1-4-2001 | 1-8-2012 | NIDHAULI KALAWN UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 24. | 84/2013 | SATISH KUMAR | 1-1-1993 | 1-8-2012 | AWAGARH, ETAH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 25. | 87/2013 | ROOP KISHORE | JULY 2003 | 01-08-2012 | NAGARIA BRANCH UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
| 26. | 85/2013 | AMAR BABU | JANUARY 2008 | 1-8-2012 | JIRSAMI(ETAH) UNDER SHREYAS GRAMIN BANK |
| 27. | 90/2013 | PRADEEP KR. JAIN | 1992 | 1-1-2010 | SAKRAULI (ETAH) UNDER ETAH GRAMIN BANK |
30. In the claim petition filed by each workman it is alleged that on 01.04.2014 Shreyas Gramin Bank and Aryavart Regional Gamin Bank were amalgamated with each other and Gramin Bank of Aryavart was constituted of which Head Office is situated at A-2/46, Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. It is also alleged that prior to 01.04.13, in the month of June 2006, Aligarh Gramin Bank, Etah Gramin Bank and Jamuna Gramin Bank were amalgamated with each other and in its place Shreyas Gramin Bank was constituted.
31. It is further alleged that the then branch managers of the branches mentioned above, to run effectively the working of the branch and with permission of senior officers of the bank had appointed the workers as temporary daily rated employee / messenger (coolie), but no appointment letters were issued to the concerned workmen by the management. The entire workers under the instructions of the branch managers had worked for whole month and their work and conduct ever remained satisfactory. It is further alleged by all the workmen that despite performing work for whole month, they had been paid wages only for 10 days and all the workmen were being assured by the then branch managers of the respective branches that in case they continue to work in the branch, their services will be regularized at the post of permanent messenger. Workers have further stated that believing the assurances given by the employer they continued to work in the respective branches of the bank. It is further pleaded that all the workers were also used to be paid bonus according to Rules. One fine morning suddenly by oral order of the then branch managers of respective branches, the services of all the workers were terminated (as per date mentioned in the chart as above) in gross violation of the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by adopting Unfair Labor Practice as also ignoring their length of service. It is further pleaded by all the workers that from the facts and circumstances herein above it is established that they were removed from the services of the bank on an arbitrary and whimsical considerations without following the legal provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
32. Lastly it is prayed by each worker that they be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger with full back wages and further all of them be regularized in the service of bank.
33. It is pertinent to mention here that all the workers have also filed a copy of Public Notice dated 01.04.2013, issued by the Head office of Aryavart Gramin Bank, Luckow, which, inter-alia, provide amalgamation of Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) sponsored by Bank of India and Canara Bank into a single larger RRB in the State of Uttar Pradesh. It further provides that by Notification No. F.No.719/2011-RRB(UP-1) dated 01.04.2013, Government of India, in the exercise of powers under sub section (1) of section 23(A) of the Regional Rural Banks Act 1976 (21) in consultation with National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) Government of Uttar Pradesh, Bank of India and Canara Bank being the sponsor's bank of 1) Aryavart Kshertiya Garmin Bank and 2) Shreyas Gramin Bank, referred to as Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) has in public interest and in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Bank and also in the interest of development of the area served by the aforesaid Regional Rural Banks and also in the interest of the said Regional Rural Banks themselves notified amalgamation of the two Regional Rural Banks into a single Regional Rural Bank with effect from the date of publication of the said Notification in the official Gazette of Government of India.
34. It has further been stated by the Opposite Party that therefore, from the above notification which is a public document, it is established that the Shreyas Gramin Bank stands eliminated and after amalgamation, in its2696 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] place Gramin Bank of Aryavart has been legally placed and all the workers would be deemed to have been appointed by the Gramin Bank of Aryavat, Lucknow at their respective branches.
35. Management has filed a common reply in each case wherein it is admitted by the management that Shreyas Gramin Bank had been amalgamated with Gramin Bank of Aryavart by notification ref.No. F.No. 7/9/2011 RRB (U.P.1) dated 01.04.2013.
36. Management has further alleged that appointment and promotions in the respondent bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and prevailing rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the RRB Act, 1976 and known as (RRB Appointment and Promotion Rules, 1998).
37. It is further alleged that none of the applicants were ever appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedure laid down by the Government of India. All the workers were engaged as Coolie in the Branches of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on day to day basis in case of need of the branch. That none of the workers have worked for whole month and the coolie charges have been paid to the petitioners on day to day basis, who were engaged on emergent basis. Coolie Charges have been paid to the workers by charging the amount from Contingency Charges by the respective branch managers on the basis of actual number of working days. It is also denied by the bank that it had ever paid any salary or wages to the workers and that the "Coolie Charges" does not come within the definition of wages.
38. It is also denied by the management that there ever existed the relationship of master and servant between the Gramin Bank of Aryavat and the workman and that they had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank. It is also pleaded that none of the worker had ever marked his attendance in the attendance register. None of the worker had ever held any regular and permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to any of the workman involved in the present case. It is also denied by the management that any of the workman had worked for 240 days of continuous service during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of services. All the workmen were engaged on day to day basis and that such engagement came to an end at the end of the day. The management had never terminated the services of the workmen as mentioned in the present reference order, therefore, the present reference on this ground alone, is without jurisdiction, bad in law and not maintainable under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The service conditions of the bank employee do not apply to any of the workmen. Recruitment in the bank is done as per the set guidelines of the Government and accordingly candidates are sponsored by the Regional Employment Exchange, thereafter, they are subjected to written test and interview and only those candidates are appointed by offering them appointment letter in the service of the bank who have been declared successful. It is also pleaded that all the workmen are trying to enter into the service of the bank through back door entry by misusing and abusing the powers of this Tribunal. The persons engaged in emergent need on casual or daily rate basis are not covered by the "Bank Awards and Settlements". It is denied by the management that at any point of time it had contravened any of the provisions of the Act. The selection and appointment against regular and permanent post is the prerogative of the competent authority of the bank and a person who had never been recruited on regular basis had no right to assail the action of the appointing authority. The bank had never retrenched or terminated the services of the workmen at any point of time by oral or written orders, hence no industrial dispute exists between the contesting parties. It is also pleaded that none of the worker is covered by the definition of Workman as defined u/s 2(s) of the Act as also the management is not an Employer as defined under section 2(g) of the Act. That the workmen of the instant case prior to raising of the present dispute had also approached the Hon'ble High Court Allahabad with same prayer as has been prayed in their respective claim petitions but their writ petition was dismissed by order dated 01.03.2012, hence the decision of the Hon'ble Court is binding in the present case also.
39. On merit of the case It is admitted by the bank that the petitioners were engaged for the work of coolie in the branch of the Bank and Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent requirement and on day to day basis in case of any need at the branch. None of the worker was ever appointed as Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the branch. Since there was no regular vacancy in the branch, therefore, the question of appointment on the post of Daily Rated Messenger (Coolie) in the bank does not arise at all. None of the worker had produced formal letter of their appointment in the bank and all of them are perhaps trying to seek back door entry in the service of the bank. It is also denied by the bank that at any point of time the bank had adopted any unfair labor practice with regard to the workmen.
40. The management on the basis of above pleadings has prayed that the present claim of the respective workers is devoid of merit and is therefore, liable to be rejected in lim-ne. It is also prayed that none of the workman is entitled for the relief claimed by them.
41. Rejoinder statements have also been filed by each of the workmen but therein nothing new has been pleaded except reiterating of the facts already pleaded in their respective claim petitions.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 269742. It is relevant to mention here that by order dated 17.02.16, industrial dispute case nos 138, 139 of 13 and 83/14 were further consolidated with Industrial Dispute No. 41 of 13 which was made the leading case.
43. The management by application dated 02.11.2015 which is paper no. 14/1 has filed photocopy of order dated 20.09.2011 passed in Writ A No.-53798 of 2011 and order dated 01.03.2013 passed in Writ A No. 11728 of 2012 passed by Hon'ble High Court, Allahabad.
44. It is pertinent to mention here that by order dated 27.05.15, this tribunal partly allowed the application for summoning of documents from the management and the management was directed to produce Vouchers, Attendance Register, Salary Register, Dispatch Register (Tappal) as these documents are relevant for deciding the case.
45. In the instant case on behalf of the workmen S/Sri Udaiveer Singh in I.D. No.109 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.1, Virendra Kumar Jain in I. D. Case No. 89 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w. 2, Ram Naresh in I.D. No. 111 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.3, Pushpendra Kumar in I. D. No. 43 of 2013, has examined himself as w.w.4 and Sri Hariom Tatsat in I.D. No. 82 of 2013 has examined himself as w.w.5, and all of them have filed their evidence on affidavit. They have also filed certain photocopies of the documents like payment vouchers and dispatch registers which have been duly verified by the bank.
46. In his affidavit evidence W.W.1 Sri Udaiveer Singh has stated nothing new except reiterating the statement made by him in his claim petition. He has filed photocopies of payment vouchers dated 01.08.11, 01.09.11, 01.10.11, 31.10.11, 01.12.11, 18.01.12, 02.02.12, 02.03.12, 31.03.12, 04.05.12, 02.06.12, 07.07.12 and 13.09.12 in support of his claim and all these payment vouchers are marked as paper no. 15/4 to15/17. All these documents are duly verified by the bank. Beside the witness has also filed photocopies of dispatch register paper no. 15/19 to 15/68.
47. This witness in his cross examination has categorically admitted that he was engaged by the branch manager on need basis as Coolie. He admitted that he was used to be paid his wages by the bank from contingency through voucher. Witness has further admitted the fact that he was never issued any appointment letter from the bank and he also expressed his ignorance as to whether or not such letter is available on the record of the case. He has submitted that his attendance was marked and the record showing that he had rendered 240 days of continuous service is available on the file. He further asserted that he was removed from the service in the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the exact date on which his services were dispensed with by the bank.
48. In his affidavit evidence workman W.W.2, Virendra Kumar Jain has deposed that on 26.03.2010, the then Shreyas Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart) had opened its new Branch at Firozabad and at that time no person was appointed on the post of Messenger on permanent basis. The then Branch Manager after approval of his senior officers had appointed him on the post of Messenger (Coolie). He performed the duties of messenger with full devotion. Worker has further given details of payment of monthly salary during the period March 2010 to June 2012, and last payment of salary was at Rs.4275/- in the month of June 2012. He has further deposed that the bank used to utilize his services outside the branch and that with effect from 30.06.2012 suddenly he was removed from the service of the bank in an arbitrary manner without making compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Act. He has further deposed that he is unemployed.
49. The witness W.W.2 in support of the above assertions has filed photocopy of payment vouchers duly verified by the Senior Manager, City Branch, Firozabad, Gramin Bank of Aryavart and these payment vouchers are dated 01.09.11, paper no. 14/6, 29.09.11, paper no. 14/7, 01.11.2011, paper no. 14/8, 01.12.11, paper no. 14/9, 31.12.11, paper no. 14/10, 01.02.12, paper no. 14/11, 29.02.12, paper no.14/12, 31.03.12, paper no, 14/13, 01.05.12, paper no. 14/14 and 01.06.2012, paper no. 14/15 and 30.06.12, paper no.14/16. Apart from above, the worker has also filed certain photocopies of letters of the branch manager addressed to Regional Office of the Bank at Agra purported to have been sent through the workman over which the branch manager had verified his signatures. These documents are paper no. 14/17 to 14/20. He has further filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by the bank which are paper no. 14/21 to 14/69.
50. In his cross examination the worker has admitted that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager on need basis. He was not paid his wages on daily wages rather wages were paid to him on monthly basis through vouchers. Sometimes bank used to pay him wages 1800/- per month and sometimes Rs.2600/-. He admitted the fact that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank and that he was not used to mark his attendance in the register in the branch. He further admitted that the signatures appearing on paper no. 14/6 to 14/16 which are payment vouchers are not his signatures. It is correct that there is no document on the record to show that he had rendered continuous service of 240 days but he was paid through vouchers and lastly he has submitted that the bank dispensed with his services on 12.06.2012.
51. Workman Ram Naresh in I.D. Case No. 111/2013 has examined himself as W.W.3 and has filed his evidence on affidavit in which he has deposed that on 10.8.99 he was engaged as Part Time Sweeper by the then Branch Manager, Etah Gramin Bank ( now known as Gramin Bank of Aryavart). He has further deposed that the bank had paid him wages and bonus as per rules. By an oral order he was transferred to Muhiuddin2698 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Branch of the Bank as the regular part time sweeper posted at that branch was transferred to Regional Office, Etah. Witness has further stated that he was working continuously from 12.08.11. Witness has further given details of payment of wages for the period September 2011 to June 2012. Apart from above statement, the witness has reiterated the allegations made by him in his petition.
52. W.W.3 in his cross examination has admitted the fact that the bank had engaged him on the post of Coolie on need basis. He was being paid his wages directly through the branch manager and that monthly wages were paid to him through voucher. He has further admitted that he was not issued any appointment letter by the bank. The voucher that are filed along with his petition do not bear his signatures. Witness has stated that his attendance was marked in the branch but he has not filed any record showing that he had worked continuously for 240 days. Lastly the witness has stated that he was removed from the service of the bank in the month of June 2012, but he does not remember the actual date of his termination from the service.
53. This witness along with his affidavit evidence has also filed photocopies of dispatch register duly verified by the bank, but the witness has not whispered even a single word that the writing appearing on the register is of his own hand writing and that these documents also do not disclose the fact that actually it was in his name or documents bear the name of the witness. The documents filed by the witness are paper no.13/16 to 13/22.
54. Lastly worker Pushpendra Kumar has examined himself as W.W.5 and has filed his affidavit in his evidence. He has also filed photocopies of payment vouchers which are paper no. 12/5 to 12/13 and photocopies of dispatch register paper no. 12/14 to 12/31. All these documents have been duly verified by the bank.
55. W.W.5 in his evidence has reiterated the same facts which have been pleaded by him in his claim petition therefore, there is no need to detail those facts again.
56. In his cross examination the above witness has admitted that it is correct that he was engaged as Coolie by the branch manager. Witness has further admitted that his wages was directly transferred in his account by the bank and this fact has not been mentioned by him in his affidavit. He was not given any appointment letter by the bank. The vouchers that are filed along with his affidavit do not bear his signatures. His attendance was not recorded by the bank and he has not filed any record showing that he had worked for 240 days continuously in the preceding year. Witness has further deposed that he was removed from the service of the bank in the month of June 12 without making any payment. Witness again stated that he was paid bonus by the bank after June 2012 but exact amount of bonus is not known to him. Witness has lastly stated that no record has been filed by him relating to the bonus paid to him by the bank.
57. On the contrary, the bank has examined Shri Rakesh Kumar as M.W.1, who has filed his affidavit in evidence. This witness has stated that presently he is posted as Manager Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Branch Punhera, District Etah. M.W.1 in his evidence has further stated that Gramin Bank of Aryavart is a Regional Rural Bank established under the provision of Section 3 of Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976, and as per the provision of the Act, Regional Rural Bank shall in discharge of its function be guided by such direction in regard to matter of Policy as the Central Government may give or make in this behalf. This witness goes on to state that appointments and promotions in the bank are made as per Government of India guidelines and prevailing Rules in the Bank are also framed by Government of India in exercise of powers conferred by section 29 read with section 17 of the Regional Rural Bank Act, 1976 and now known as (RRB APPOINTMENT 7 PROMOTION RULES 1998). Witness further states that the applicant Jagdish Singh and other applicants were never appointed to any substantive post in the bank by following the procedures laid down by Central Government under the said Appointment & Promotions Rules, 1998. Applicant Jagdish Singh and other applicants were engaged as Coolie in the branch of the Bank; Coolie is a person who is engaged by the Branch Manager on the emergent need of work and on Day to Day basis. It is further stated by the witness that none of the workers involved in the case had ever worked as a Coolie for whole month in the branch and Coolie charge have been paid to the workers on Day-to Day basis who were engaged on the emergent requirement of the Branch. Coolie charges have been paid to the workers by drawing the amounts from Contingency Charges and that bank had never paid any wages to the concerned workmen. There exists no relationship of Master and Servant between the bank and the concerned workmen. Concerned workmen had never been on the rolls of the bank as they were not in the service of the bank and that none of the concerned workmen had ever marked their attendance in the bank and that none of the worker had ever held any Regular and Permanent post in the bank. Bank had never issued any appointment letter to the concerned workmen in any cadre whatsoever. It is also denied that any of the concerned workman had continuously worked for 240 days during the period of 12 calendar months preceding the date of their alleged respective termination. Bank had never terminated the services of the concerned workmen. Service Conditions applicable on the regular and permanent employees of the bank are not applicable on the concerned workmen; hence they are not entitled to get any benefits or facilities like regular and permanent employees of the Bank. Name of none of the concerned workmen had ever been sponsored through the Employment Exchange or had any one of them ever been subjected to any written test or interview by the bank. Lastly it is stated by the witness in his affidavit that there is no regular and permanent vacancy in the bank against which[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2699 the concerned claimants are claiming their reinstatement or permanent regularization in the bank, therefore, none of the claimants have any lien or right on any regular and permanent post.
58. In his cross examination M.W.1 has stated that in the year 1983 he was appointed as an officer in the head office of Etah Gramin Bank, Etah. Witness has denied the suggestion as to whether it is correct that Officers and Employees are appointed under Appointment & Promotion Rules 1998. Witness has stated that Coolie is appointed as per need basis. After going through the document paper no.15/5, the witness has stated that it is a payment voucher with regard to whosoever is appointed as Coolie and bears the signature of the officer of the branch i.e. Branch Manager and payment has been mentioned for 26 days. Except holidays, the branch continues to work for whole month. Similarly the witness after going through paper no.15/17 has stated that the payment had been made to Coolie but it does not contain the name of the Coolie. Witness has further admitted that he had appointed a person by name Devendra Jain as Coolie and that he does not remember as to whether amongst 28 concerned workmen any of them had been appointed or not. Witness has expressed his complete ignorance about the 28 concerned workmen and whatever has been deposed by him in his affidavit is correct, but complete whereabouts about the 28 concerned workmen is not known to him. Witness has further shown his ignorance about the fact that Jagdish or other concerned workers have worked for 240 days or not. Whatever payment vouchers have been filed on the record of the court file is correct. The witness has denied the suggestion that concerned workers who are alleged to have been removed from the service of the bank on 30.06.12 have been given any notice or retrenchment compensation. It is not in his knowledge as to whether concerned workmen were given bonus or not in the year 2013. It is not in his knowledge that in the year 2013 workman Jagdish was paid bonus or not likewise he has no knowledge that in City Branch of Firozabad except Coolie there was any regular messenger.
59. I have heard the arguments of both the learned representatives for the parties at length and have given my anxious considerations to the documents and evidence led by the parties.
60. The learned representative for the workmen has mainly argued that the concerned workers were appointed as messenger in the bank by the respective Branch Managers as Messenger/Coolie after seeking the approval of the senior officers of the Bank for doing the regular and permanent work of the bank. The concerned workmen were used to be paid their wages month wise and all the concerned workers have continued to serve the bank on the assurances given by the officers of the bank that their services will be regularized as Messenger in the Branch, but suddenly under the oral order of the Branch Manager their services were dispensed with from the date mentioned in the reference order without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in utter violation of the principle of natural justice. It is also argued that the bank had neither given any notice nor retrenchment compensation to the concerned workmen at the time of dispensation of their services, therefore, they are entitled to be reinstated in the service of the bank at the post of messenger with full back wages and continuity of service.
61. On the contrary the representative for the management has advanced his arguments submitting that none of the concerned worker had ever been appointed by the bank in any capacity whatsoever; none of the concerned worker had ever been paid wages by the bank; no appointment letter has been issued to any of the worker; concerned workers have never been in the regular and permanent employment of the bank; there existed no relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers; none of the worker had ever completed 240 days of continuous service in the bank preceding 12 calendar year from the date of their respective termination of the service; the concerned workers have no lien or right against any regular and permanent post as none of them had ever been subjected to selection process prescribed under Rules of the Bank, hence in the eye of law the relief claimed by the concerned workers is not liable to be allowed and the entire claim of the concerned workers are liable to be rejected.
62. Considering the rival contention of the contesting parties it has become essential that the Tribunal should first examine the fact as to whether the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their alleged termination as mentioned in the respective reference order.
63. Weighing the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced by the concerned worker it is abundantly clear that the concerned workers with one voice have asserted in their oral evidence that they have completed 240 days of continuous service in a year and in support thereof have also filed photocopies of the payment vouchers which are duly verified by the bank. By a careful examination of these payment vouchers, it is quite evident that in the payment vouchers the name of the workers have not been mentioned and even each witness from the side of worker has admitted that these payment vouchers do not bear their signatures. Therefore, if it is so, how the statement of the witnesses appeared from the side of the concerned workmen could be believed. Even photocopies of dispatch register filed by the witnesses in support of their claim do not make it clear that by whom the entries therein have been made and thus these documents are of no help to the concerned workers and it is not established that the concerned workers have completed 240 days of continuous service in 12 calendar months preceding the date of their respective termination of service.
2700 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]64. Management witness has categorically asserted in his evidence that no appointment letter was issued to the concerned workers, none of the concerned worker had ever worked continuously for 240 days, none of the worker had either been issued any appointment letter or had been paid regular wages from the bank. Therefore from the evidence of the management witness it stands proved that none of the concerned worker was ever remained in the employment of the bank or the bank had ever paid regular wages or salary to the concerned workers.
65. It is also proved from the oral as well as documentary evidence available on the record of the case that there never existed relationship of Employer and Employee between the Bank and the concerned workers and it is also established from the evidence of the parties that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months from the date of their respective termination.
66. Needless to mention that it would be futile exercise to examine as to whether any notice or retrenchment compensation was paid to the concerned workers at the time of dispensation of their services as none of the concerned worker have specifically pleaded in their claim petition that they worked continuously for 240 days, neither it has been proved.
67. Having concluded that none of the worker had worked continuously for 240 days in the bank, they are not entitled for any relief as claimed by them in their respective claim petition.
68. Representative for the worker has placed reliance on the following Rulings:-
a) AIR 1982 SC 854 in the case of L.Robert D' souza vs Executive Engineer.
b) 1989 LAB IC 623 (PATNA HIGH COURT) IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
c) AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2532 IN THE CASE OF DEVINDER SINGH VS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SANAUR.
69. The rulings relied by the representative for the worker are distinguishable on facts and law both and they are not helpful to the concerned workers particularly when it has been held that they have not been able to prove that they remained in continuous employment of the bank for 240 days preceding 12 calendar months.
70. The representative for the management has also relied upon the following case laws –
1. FLR 2007 (112) 345 in the case of State of M.P. and others vs Lalit Kumar Verma.
2. FLR 2007 (112) Indian Drugs & Pharma Ltd. Vs Workman IDPL S.C.
3. 2006 (110) FLR 803 Manager (Now Regional Director) RBI & Gopi Nath Sharma and others.
4. 2006 (109) FLR 237, Allahabad High Court in the case of Sarjan Kumar vs Central Bank of India and others.
71. The above case laws have been considered by me. and I am of the opinion that the preposition of law laid down in the above cited cases fully applies to the facts and circumstances of the case in hand and on the basis of the same it is once again held that none of the concerned worker are entitled for any relief. After having heard the arguments of both the parties at length, on scanning of the record and evidence available before the tribunal, it is inferred that none of the concerned workmen is entitled to any relief.
72. In view of above discussions, the award is adjudicated accordingly.
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
Date: 10.04.2019
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 659-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 6@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2701
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 659.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 6/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 27th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 6/2011
Between:
Sri Kola Rajesham, S/o Rajaposham, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad . ...Petitioner AND
1. The Chief General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam Area-I,
Karimnagar District.
3. The Superintendent of Mines, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., GDK No.2A incline, Ramagundam Area-I, Karimnagar District. …Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Kola Rajesham who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 18.2.1997and later he was converted as coal filler in the year 2005. But during the year 2006 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and faced other family problems like, suffering of his father with heart stroke and his elder brother met with an accident, as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 26.3.2007 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2006 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 10.6.2008. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the2702 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents' management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 11 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 21.2.1997 as Badli Filler and later he was appointed as Coal Filler with effect from 1.8.2006. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4. The domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 16.6.2017.
5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.
6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is legal and justified?
II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7. Point No.I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his illness, and heart stroke to his father and accident to his brother and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 41 years, he is now aged about 48 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2703 modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but has worked for about 11 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No. I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Kola Rajesham is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. RG.1/PER/S/46/3494 dated 10.6.2008 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri Kola Rajesham be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 27th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner: Witnesses examined for the Respondent:
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 660-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 7@2011½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2704 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 660.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 7/2011) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 7/2011
Between:
Sri Sk. Shareef Pasha, S/o Hussain Baba, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad .
…Petitioner
AND
1. The Director (P.A. & W), M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem. Khammam District.
2. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri. Adilabad District.
3. The Colliery Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kasipet Mine, Mandamarri Area, Mandamarri. Adilabad District.
… Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri SK. Shareef Pasha who worked as Badli Filler (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler w.e.f. 24.3.2007. But during the year 2008 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health as his left leg was burnt and faced other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties, as the injuries could not be cured for long time. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 10.1.2009 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2705 conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 26.5.2010 with effect from 16.6.2010. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary,violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 19.6.2007 as Badli Filler and continued to be in the same designation till the date of his dismissal without regularization. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4. In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner conceding the legality and validity of the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 18.4.2017.
5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.
6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is legal and justified?
II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to illness, burning of his left leg, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it was not considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
2706 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 25 years, he is now aged about 33 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man, has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is not a first offender but has worked for about 8 (eight) years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workers as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri SK. Shareef Pasha is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service, he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. MMR/PER/D/072/10/2982 dated 26.5.2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent and the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/90/2050 dated 15.11.2010 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri SK. Shareef Pasha be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a badli filler, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2707 ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 661-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 34@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 661.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 34/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 19th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 34/2009
Between:
Sri S. Anjaiah, S/o Mallaiah, C/o Smt. A. Sarojana, Advocate, Flat No.G7, Rajeshwari Gayatri Sadan, Opp: Badruka Jr. College for Girls, Kachiguda, Hyderabad .
..….Petitione AND
1. The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampally (P), Bellampally, Adilabad District.
2. The Colliery Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Goleti-2 Incline, Bellampally, Adilabad District.
…Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri S. Anjaiah who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the proceeding No.P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2708 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]2. The averments made in the petition in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler in 1984 and later he was converted as General Mazdoor. But during the year 1997 the Petitioner suffered with ill-health and other family problems as a result of which, he could not be regular to his duties. While the matters stood thus, one charge sheet dated 28.4.1997 was served to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 1997 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 4.4.1998 vide order dated 1.4.1998. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Petitioner has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the above said period as it was only on account of his ill-health and some family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Petitioner was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents' management in dismissing the Petitioner from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has rendered about 14 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management.The Petitioner approached the Respondents to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by Respondent No.1 is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondents' company on 17.6.1983 as Badli Filler and later he was regularized as General Mazdoor with effect from 1.8.1984. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner has attended the dates fixed for the enquiry and had fully participated in the enquiry. He was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend himself in the enquiry. The enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4. In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner conceding the domestic enquiry held in this case as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 16.6.2010.
5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.
6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is legal and justified?
II. Whether the Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that due to his illness and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Petitioner has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner. When the Petitioner has taken a stand that due to his illness, and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case while imposing punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27099. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his illness, and other family problems, the Petitioner could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Petitioner has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Petitioner were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed. After dismissal of service, the Petitioner has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 45 years, he is now aged about 55 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Petitioner being an able bodied and energetic man has already realised his mistake and is coming forward to work under the Respondents, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Petitioner is a first offender and has worked for about 14 years under the Respondents. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri S. Anjaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for his reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Petitioner has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Petitioner should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But in this case, the Petitioner has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Petitioner is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
ORDER
Proceeding No. P.BPA/129/953 dated 1.4.1998 issued by the 1st Respondent is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman Sri S. Anjaiah be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., a Badli Filler on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
The Workman can not claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry, and in case the workman completes one year of probation period successfully he will continue in service till the age of his attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL2710 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 662-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- ,y lh 59@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22013@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 662.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. LC 59/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22013/01/2019-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 18th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE L.C.No. 59/2009
Between:
Sri Anga Ramulu, S/o Ramulu, R/o H.No.14-5-482, Pittalanagar Post, Karimnagar.
…Petitioner
AND
1. The Chief General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam Area-I, Khammam District.
2. The Superintendent of Mines, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., JDK-2 Incline, Ramagundam Division-I, Khammam District.
… Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Sri M. Venkata Swamy, Advocate
For the Respondent : Sri S.M. Subhani, Advocate
AWARD
Sri Anga Ramulu who worked as General Mazdoor (who will be referred to as the workman) has filed this petition under Sec. 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the Respondents M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., seeking for declaring the dismissal order dated 4.9.2002 issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same consequently directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service duly granting all the consequential benefits such as continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits etc., and such other reliefs as this court may deems fit.
2. The Petitioner workman has filed his claim petition and Respondent also filed their respective counter statement.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27113. The domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid as it was not contested by the Petitioner. The case stands posted for arguments, but the Petitioner did not turn up though several opportunities were afforded to him.
4. Inspite of availing several opportunities to adduce evidence, the Petitioner workman remained absent and there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner has already been settled. In the circumstances stated above, it is felt that the Petitioner workman has got no claim to raise. Thus, 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 18th day of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 663-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 31@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@04@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 663.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 31/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 19th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 31/2015
Between:
The General Secretary (Sh. Riaz Ahmed), Singareni Miners & Engg. Workers Union (HMS), Qr. No. C-34, Sector-1, Godavarikhani-505 209. Karimnagar District (Telengana State). …Petitioner Union AND
The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani-505 209. Karimnagar District (Telengana State). …Respondent2712 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocates
For the Respondent : M/s. Nandigam Krishna Rao, N.S. Pattabhi Rama Rao & J. Narasimulu, Advocates
AWARD
This is a reference issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi vide order No. L-22012/04/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 5.5.2015 whereunder this Tribunal is required to adjudicate the dispute i.e.,
"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services of Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex- Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2013 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?
After receiving the above said reference this Tribunal registered the case as I D No.31/2015 and issued notices to both the parties and secured their presence.
2. The workman filed his claim statement with the averments in brief as follows:
The workman Sri Pothula Narasaiah, was initially appointed as a Badli Filler on 9.11.1992 and later he was confirmed as Coal Filler on 27.12.1995. He wasregular to his duties and performing his duties upto the satisfaction of all his superiors. While so, during the year 2001 the younger brother of the Petitioner workman suffered with mental problems and there was no one to look after his ailing brother in his family. As he had to take his ailing brother to various hospitals for treatment of mental illness, he could not be regular to his duties during the year 2001. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 9.10.2002 was issued to him by the Respondent alleging that the Workman absented for duty during the year 2001, which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. The workman submitted his explanation to the charge sheet. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and the Workman was not given any opportunity much less valid in nature to put forth his grievances. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved, and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Workman was dismissed from service w.e.f. 11.12.2003. It is stated that during the course of the enquiry the Workman has categorically stated about his inability to perform his duties regularly during the year 2001, which was only on account of his younger brother's ill-health and other family problems. But without considering any of his submissions, the Workman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondent's management in dismissing the Workman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Workman has rendered 11 years of continuous service in the Respondent's management. The Workman approached the Respondent to consider his case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Workman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order issued by the Respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Workman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, and back wages etc..
3. Respondent filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:
In the counter the Respondent while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Workman was appointed in the Respondent's company on 9.11.1992 as Badli Filler and subsequently appointed as coal filler on 1.9.1995. He was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Workman did not attend the enquiry, which was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Workman was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Workman by way of show cause notice giving him an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry oficer; since the charge levelled against the Workman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and his past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondent was constrained to dismiss the Workman from service. It is stated that in fact the Workman was irregular to his duties and he did not improve his attendance even after issuing charge sheet to him, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Workman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4. In view of the memo filed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Union/workman, conceding the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents as legal and valid, the domestic enquiry conducted in this case is held as legal and valid vide order dated 7.1.2019.
5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27136. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is legal and justified?
II. Whether the Workman is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III. If not, to what other relief he is entitled?
7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Workman argued that due to his younger brother's ill-health as well as other family problems, the Workman could not be able to attend his duty sincerely. Even in his show cause the Workman has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Workman. When the Workman has taken a stand that due to his younger brother's illness and other family problems he could not be able to attend his duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered his case sympathetically while imposing capital punishment. The authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Workman, and has given capital punishment to the Workman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent argued that when the Workman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty of the charges levelled against him, the punishment imposed by the Respondent's company is legal and proper. When the Workman was not sincere in his duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year he is not entitled to be reinstated into service.
9. Admittedly, working in the Mines is hazardous and remaining absent is not unusual. In this case, due to his younger brother's mental illness and other family problems, the Workman could not be able to be regular in his duty, the Workman has remained absent in his duties and a proceeding was initiated against him for his absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the charges levelled against the Workman were proved. For this, capital punishment was imposed on the workman. After dismissal of service, the Workman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to his family members. He has already realised his mistake and has taken shelter in the court at the age of 42 years, he is now aged about 46 years and is searching ways and means to provide bread and butter to his family members. When the Workman, being an able bodied and energetic man and has already realised his mistake, and is coming forward to work under the Respondent, atleast one chance should be given to him for reinstatement into service at the end of his service period. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. Though the Workman is a first offender and has worked for about 11 years under the Respondent, while imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workman as well as his family members. In this case, the punishment imposed on the workman by the Respondent management for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action taken by the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified.
Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Sri Pothula Narasaiah is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Workman has already realised his mistake and has come to the court with a prayer for reinstatement into service he should be given a chance to serve for his family members. After dismissal of service the Workman has become jobless and he being the sole bread earner of his family, is unable to provide a square meal to his family members. In such a circumstances atleast the Workman should be given a chance to maintain his livelihood and to work under the Respondent's management. But in this case, the Workman has not come to the court soon after his dismissal of service. Therefore, in the opinion of this Tribunal the Workman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in his claim petition. But he is only entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondent's management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
RESULT:
In the result, the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District., in terminating the services Sri Pothula Narasaiah, Ex-Coal Filler, GDK-3 Inc., RG-I Area, with effect from 9.12.2003 is not justified and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workman be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Badli filler in Cat.I, on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workman at the time of his posting.
2714 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]The Workman cannot claim for his posting in the same place, where he was last employed. The workman shall have to maintain either minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman shall not be terminated and he will be cautioned to improve his performance by issuing him a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, he will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry and in the event of completion of one year of probation satisfactorily, the workman is to continue in service till the age of attaining superannuation. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for his appointment afresh and the reference is answered accordingly, so also the, award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 19th day of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Workman Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Workman
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 664-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 39@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@24@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 664.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 39/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 39/2015
Between:
The President (Bandari Satyanarayana), Rashtriya Collieries Mazdoor Sangh(INTUC), Rajkumar Complex, Saibaba Temple Road, Jaffar nagar, Mancherial – 504208. Adilabad District. …Petitioner Union[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2715
AND
The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292. Adilabad Distt. …Respondent
Appearances :
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent : Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/24/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area, Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Bandi Raja Komuru, Ex-Coal Filler, Goleti-2 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 23.5.2001 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 39/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.
3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner union. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner union remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner/Union. Non-appearance of the workman/Petitioner Union and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the workman/Petitioner Union has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the workman/Petitioner Union is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 665-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ,l-bZ-lh-,y ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 80@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&22012@251@2000&vkbZvkj ¼lh-II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2716 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 665.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 80/2001) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s SECL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/80/2001
Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma, S/o Mangal Prasad Vishwakarma, C/o M.L.Vishwakarma, Asstt. Engineer (St.RE), MP Electricity Board, Sidhi (MP) …Workman
Versus
Sub Area Manager, Bungwar Sub Area of SECL, PO Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) …Management
AWARD
Passed on this 9th day of April 2019
1. As per letter dated 27-4-2001 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-22012/251/2000-IR(C-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL, PO
Beomhauri, Distt. Shahdol (MP) in dismissing of Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal
Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified? If
not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman alleged that he was first appointed as ITI Apprentice in Electrical Trade on 1-12-92 by Dy.Chief Personal Manager of the employers and after completing 1 year training on 1-2-94, he was appointed as General Mazdoor Category-I on 16-2-94 in pay scale of NCWA-IV by Chief Personal Manager SECL, Sohagpur. During the course of his employment, he suffered from Hepatitis and as there was no one to look after him at the project, he went to his brother's place at Sidhi where he was referred to Gandhi Clinic for treatment. He was under treatment of consulting Doctor at Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since November 94, was advised rest, hence unable to perform his duties for about 5 months. A showcause notice dated 16-4-96 was issued by employer management alleging that he remained absent since 22-11-94 which was a misconduct under order 26.24 & 26.23 of standing orders and was required to explain within 74 hours. He sent his reply with medical certificate vide registered letter dated 1-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95, received by management on 5-5-95. It was further alleged that the workman further suffered from Hepatitis and depression as well psychophobia and was under continuous treatment of Doctor Praveen Kumar, Medical College Rewa till 27-1-97 and when after recovery reported himself for duty in the office of employers, he was not permitted to join his duty by the management. It is the case of the workman that he was never served any notice from the management regarding any enquiry. He submitted his representation to the management which was not considered. Thereafter he raised a dispute with the Asstt. Labor Commissioner. After failure of conciliation, the dispute was referred by the Central Government to this Tribunal. According to the workman, the charge against him was as follows:-
"On verification of record, it is found that you are absent from your work from 22-11-94 without any information. This action of yours constitutes misconduct under Section 26.24 and 26.30 of company stand order.
Section 26.24 Habit of absent without sufficient reason or habit of coming late.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2717Section 26.30 To remain absent without sanctioned leave or sufficient reason from work or remain absent from more than sanctioned leave."
3. Workman further alleged that the domestic enquiry held by the Enquiry Officer regarding the charges was improper, invalid and illegal on following grounds, as mentioned in para 17 &18 0f statement of claim-
Para 17 - That the domestic enquiry held by enquiry officer of the above charges levelled against the workman/first party was improper, invalid and illegal interalia, on the following grounds:-
(a) That chargesheet was never served to the delinquent workman and thus very initiation of the disciplinary proceedings was bad in law.
(b) That the enquiry held by the management/ 2nd party was not just proper and lawful as the workman was not informed duly.
(c) That the principles of the natural justice were not followed by the management/2nd party as the workman/Ist party was not informed properly therefore, he could not defend his case properly.
(d) The illness of somebody is always beyond his controlled and he cannot be punished for that act which is not within his control and thus the act of the workman does not cover under the act or so called misconduct.
(e) That there is not a single evidence on record which could constitute the so called misconduct
(f) That so far as misconduct 26.30 was concerned there arose no occasion to get first leave sanctioned and only than fell sick, in case of sickness imposition of it as condition present before availing have neither could nor should be said just and proper nor it was intended by the certified standing orders. None of the conduct of the delinquent workman constitute or amount to misconduct under the certified standing order.
(g) That, the enquiry proceeding held behind the back of the workman/Ist party are unjust and illegal as the principal of natural justice are not followed in this regard.
Para-18: That the Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry
(a) Was not acting bonafide and was actuated with some extraneous or ulterior motives.
(b) That the finding of the enquiry officer is perverse, management failed to prove any misconduct of delinquent workman was charged with.
(c) That the management/second party failed completely to consider the contentions raised by the delinquent workman in his reply to the showcause notice.
(d) That the punishment imposed on delinquent workman is too severe to smeek of victimization. The service rendered by this workman were ignored and not taken in account by the management who awarded with such a harsh punishment to a poor workman.
4. Workman accordingly prayed for declaration of his termination illegal and his reinstatement in job with all the incidental benefits therewith annual and quarterly bonus with interest.
5. In the Written Statement of defense filed by the employer management, it was pleaded that habitual absence without leave or long absenteeism without prior permission has to be held misconduct under the certified standing order applicable to the workman. Workman absented himself without getting his leave sanctioned and without prior permission. Thereafter a charge sheet was issued against him regarding the charges of habitual absenteeism without sufficient reason and long absenteeism from duty without prior information and getting leave sanctioned. Vide order dated 1-7-95, the Enquiry Officer fixed 12-7-95 and notice was sent to the workman on his address furnished by him and recorded in Form B Register, maintained by office of the management but this notice was returned unserved with the endorsement that addressee was not available therefore another dated 28-7-95 was fixed by the Enquiry Officer and other registered notice was sent on the same address which was also returned unserved with the same endorsement. Thereafter another dated 18-8-95 was fixed as next date in the enquiry and 3rd notice was sent by registered post on the address which was also returned with the endorsement "addressee's whereabouts not known". In these circumstances, Enquiry Officer proceeded that the enquiry is ex parte and after recording evidence, submitted his report holding the workman guilty for the charges levelled against him. According to the proved charges, the attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 i.e. the period in which he was in employment. He absented himself details of which has been given by the management in para-15 of Written Statement.
2718 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]"That according to the records of colliery it was also proved that the workman was absenting unauthorizedly without giving intimation to the Manager of the mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his employment i.e. 16-2-1994 to 22-11-94 till he was absconded without sanctioned leave/ any intimation to the management is given here under:-
| Month | Attendance |
| February 1994 | 01 days |
| March 1994 | 17 days |
| April 1994 | 24 days |
| May 1994 | 18 days |
| June 1994 | 20 days |
| July 1994 | 16 days |
| August 1994 | 10 days |
| September 1994 | 11 days |
| October 1994 | 05days |
| November 1994 | 07 days |
The Disciplinary Officer after agreeing with the findings of Enquiry Officer regarding proof of misconduct as mentioned above, the services of workman was terminated after approval of competent authority but before inflicting punishment, another show cause notice was also given to the workman on 10-10-95 and no reply was sent by workman. It was also pleaded that appeal was preferred to the Appellate Authority who did not find any merit in the case and dismissed the appeal vide order dated 11-12/3/98. Since the workman had absented himself without any information and without any sanctioned leave or any justification, the enquiry was held against him which was conducted after giving full opportunity to the workman but since he had absconded from the address furnished by him and was not traceable, the enquiry proceeded exparte against him. It was also pleaded that the workman never filed any papers regarding treatment or medical certificate nor did he availed a well equipped treatment facility which is free of cost, provided by the employers in the hospital maintained by the employers at his work place. Accordingly it was submitted that the reference be decided against the workman.
6. Workman did not file any rejoinder.
7. On the basis of pleadings, following preliminary issue/point for determination was framed by my learned predecessor vide order dated 15-6-2010-
8. "Whether the Departmental Enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?"
9. After recording evidence on this issue, it was held by my learned predecessor since public notice regarding enquiry was not issued, the domestic enquiry was not legal and proper against workman. This order is part of this award.
10. It transpires from the record that the management sought permission to prove charges before the Tribunal. Management filed documents charge sheet dated 6-4-94, office order dated 1-7-95, notice dated 1-7-95, registered post notice dated 20-21/7/95, registered post notice dated 29-7-95 ( 2 papers), registered post statement of witnesses recorded during enquiry, certificate regarding last date of presence issued and filed during enquiry, attendance particulars filed during enquiry, Enquiry Report, show cause notice dated 10-10-95 regarding the findings of enquiry before passing sentence, recommendation of Disciplinary Authority, order of termination dated 8-1-96 along with receipt of registered post by which the order was sent, 2 representations of workman dated 29-1-1967, reminder dated 1997, Order dated 18-3-98 rejecting the representation and prove it which are Exhibit M-1 to M-23 respectively. Management examined on oath its witness Rajmani Singh and Manish Bhandari who were cross examined by workman on the point of proof of charge. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examined.
11. I have heard argument of Shri Sanjay Verma, learned counsel for workman and Shri A.K.Shashi, learned counsel for employers/management and have perused the record. After perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following other points come up in this case for determination:-
(2) Whether charges of misconduct levelled against workman has been successfully proved
against the workman?
(3) Whether the punishment given is disproportionate to the charges levelled?
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 271912. Point for Determination No.2-
According to Written Statement of defense filed by the management, the charge against workman is that he was habitual unauthorizedly absenting himself without prior information/ getting leave sanctioned within a period of his employment from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 and continuous unauthorized absence without prior information/ sanction of leave without any justifiable ground for a period 1-12-94 to 30-6-95 and thereafter.
13. According to management, this absence was unauthorized, without any prior intimation/sanction. In his written statement of claim, workman admits that he suffered from Hepatitis and went to his brother's place at Sidhi where he was treated in Gandhi Clinic Sidhi since 18-11-94 and was advised rest hence unable to perform the duties for 5 months. He was under continuous treatment under Dr.Praveen Kumar, Medical College, Rewa till 27-1-95 so the absence during the period in the charge atleast so far as it relates to continuous absence is admitted by the workman himself. This charge is further corroborated by the statement on oath recorded before the Court by statement of witness Rajmani Singh who was working as a clerk/ timekeeper with the management office. He has stated that workman was working as General Mazdoor Category -I. he absented himself since December 1994 till 30-6-94 continuously. Regarding 2nd charge of habitual absentee, this witness has stated on oath that the workman has been absented unauthorizedly without giving information to the Manager of the Mines since he joined duty. The attendance for the period of his employment i.e. from 16-2-94 to 22-11-94 is as under:-
| Month | Attendance |
| February 1994 | 01 days |
| March 1994 | 17 days |
| April 1994 | 24 days |
| May 1994 | 18 days |
| June 1994 | 20 days |
| July 1994 | 16 days |
| August 1994 | 10 days |
| September 1994 | 11 days |
| October 1994 | 05days |
| November 1994 | 07 days |
This witness further states that thereafter he absented himself unauthorizedly without any intimation till 30-6-1994. This witness further states that management has provided medical facilities for coal mine workers for which dispensary and central hospital are opened where free treatments are given by qualified Doctors in Sohagpur Area but workman did not avail free treatment and never complained of any disease. Workman never produced any medical certificate for sanction of leave, he absconded from work without any intimation. this witness further stated that workman never furnish any intimation regarding his whereabouts during the said period. The witness further stated that the attendance summary register which is Exhibit M-21 is in his signature prepared by him. In his cross examination, this witness has stated that period of absence mentioned in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief, has been stated on the basis of attendance summary register which is with management. he admits that the recording of attendance was not part of his job and he pleaded ignorance whether absence of workman was unauthorized or not.
14. Shri Manish Bhandari, Dy.Manager Personnel is another witness of management who has supported the case of Ist witness of management on the point of habitual absenteeism and unauthorized long absence of workman as mentioned in the statement of Ist management witness. Thus statement of this witness corroborates the statement of Ist witness on the point of absence. As has already been mentioned earlier, absence is not disputed by the workman rather he admits it with a case that he was under treatment during this period which he was receiving at his brother's place in Sidhi.
15. Para 106 Indian Evidence Act requires to be referred here which is as under:-
"Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge-When any fact is especially within the knowledge
of any. person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him."
This fact makes it clear that when a fact is in special knowledge of any person, burden of proving that fact is on that person hence the burden of proving the fact that he was ill and was under medical treatment during the period of his absence from duty lies on the workman. This burden can be discharged by filing documentary evidence for example Medical Certificate, certificate of fitness, documents regarding diagnosis2720 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] and treatment or by examining the Doctor under whose treatment the workman was during the period in question. Workman did not file any fitness certificate or medical certificate or any paper regarding diagnosis or treatment nor did he examined any Doctor under whose treatment he was during the period in question. The workman has examined himself on oath. He has stated in his affidavit filed as his examination-in-chief that he never absented himself during his service period whenever he remained on leave, he had filed his application for leave and during the period of his sickness also, he had filed his application for leave except this self serving statement, there is no document in support. He admits that the dispensary and hospital facilities are available to the workman and their families near the mines and in Sohagpur. He pleads ignorance about the free treatment given to workman in the management's hospital. When the management witness has stated that the workman did not file any certificate or papers regarding his illness and treatment, the burden of proving the fact that he had filed application with the management, is on the workman and he has failed to discharge this burden. Thus from the comparative analysis of evidence as respect to above produced by the parties, it comes out that firstly, the workman absented himself during the period as mentioned above and secondly,the reason for absence alleged by the workman is not established. Hence it is held that the absence of workman for the period as mentioned above is without sufficient cause, meaning thereby it is held proved that the workman absented himself during the period in question as referred above unauthorizedly, without informing the management and without any leave sanctioned. It will not be out of scope to refer the case of New India Assurance Company Ltd versus Vipin Beharilal Srivastava reported in (2008)3 Supreme Court Cases 446. The Apex Court has laid down that mere sending an application for grant of leave is not sufficient. In para-11 of the judgment, the court has observed as follows-
Para-11 The rules governing "leave" read as follows:
(1) General principles governing grant of leave. The following general principles shall govern the grant of leave to the employees;
(a) Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right.
(b) Leave shall be availed of only after sanction by the competent authority, but one days casual leave may be availed of without prior sanction in case of unforeseen emergency, provided the head of the office is promptly advised of the circumstances under which prior sanction could not be obtained.
(4) Sick leave-
(c) Sick leave can be granted to an employee only on production of a medical certificate from a registered medical practitioner, which term would include homeopathic, ayurvedic and Unani Doctor also provided they are registered medical practitioners.
(d) The certificate should state as clearly as possible the diagnosis and probable duration of treatment."
16. A reference of Rule 12.5 & Rule 13 of Certified Standing Orders applicable in the case of parties , referred to by learned counsel for management is also necessary which is as under:-
Rule 12.5: Application for leave or extension of leave on medical grounds shall be supported by a certificate from a Medical Officer of the company or where there is no such officer, a government Medical Officer or failing him, from a Registered Medical practitioner, stating the period for which leave is recommended. On receipt of such application, the sanctioning authority shall immediately inform the workman in writing whether the leave or extension of leave has been granted and if so for what period. An employee who has been sanctioned leave or an extension of leave on medical ground for a period exceeding 14 days at a time shall not be allowed to resume duty unless he produced a certificate o fitness. If no information is received by the workman, from the management, regarding leave in question as applied for, it may be presumed to be granted."
Rule-13: Application for leave:- A workman who desires to obtain leave of absence shall apply in writing to the Competent Authority, not less than 15 days before the commencement of the leave, except where leave is required in unforeseen circumstances and the competent authority shall issue orders on the application within a week of its submission of two days prior to the commencement of the leave applied for whichever is earlier, provided that if the leave applied for is to commence on the date of the application or within three days thereof orders shall be given on the same day. If the leave is refused or postponed, the fact of such refusal or postponement and the reasons therefor shall be recorded in writing in a register to be maintained for the purpose and if the workman so desires a copy of the entry in the register shall be supplied to him. If the workman after proceeding on leave, desires an extension thereof, he shall apply to the competent authority who shall send a written reply either granting or refusing extension of leave to the workman. Sanction/ refusal of leave shall be communicated to the workman in writing.
Similarly Rule 26.24 & 26.25 which deal with misconduct are also being reproduced as follows:-
Rule 26.24- Habitual late attendance or habitual absence from duty without sufficient cause.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2721Rule 26.25- Distributing or exhibiting in the company's work premises or estates, hand bills, pamphlets, posters or causing them to be displayed by means of signs or writing or other visible representations any matter prejudicial to the company without prior sanction of the management.
It is therefore, held in the light of evidence discussed above that the workman failed to comply the
provisions and his absence, held unauthorized and habitual, the charges against the workman are held
proved.
Point No for determination No.2 is answered accordingly.
17. Point for determination No.3- Rule 27.1 of certified standing order provides about penalties in case of misconduct. One of the penalty is removal/discharge from service and dismissal from service. Now question arises whether the punishment of removal of workman on the charges proved as mentioned is proportionate to the misconduct or not.
18. Learned counsel for management has referred to case Ever Ready Industries India Ltd, Jabalpur and others versus P.S.Parihar and another reported in 2003(3)MPHT-257 wherein it has been observed by the Hon'ble High Court that employer has justified in weeding out the worthless who have lost utility for the company. In the referred case, also the workman remained continuously sick for a long period and did not recover. His termination was confirmed by Hon'ble High Court. In case of New India Assurance Company Ltd.(Supra) also, the Apex Court refused to set-aside the dismissal of employee who remained continuously absent for long period without any justification. Keeping this preposition of law inn view, the dismissal of workman for the charges is held legal and justified. Workman is held not entitled to any relief. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.
19. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of Sub Area Manager, Bungler Sub Area of SECL in dismissing
Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Mangal Prasad Viswakarma General Mazdoor
Category-I from services from 8-1-96 is legal and justified.
(2) The workman Shri Ram Naresh Vishwakarma is not entitled to any relief.
20. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.
Dated:9-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 666-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 40@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22012@25@2015&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 666.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 40/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer2722 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 40/2015
Between:
Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah,
H.No.1-85,
Bellampalli (M)-504251.
Adilabad Distt. …Petitioner
AND
The General Manager,
M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.,
Bellampally Area, Goleti Township-504292.
Adilabad Distt. …Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent : Sri Dasaradha Ramulu, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/25/2015-IR(CM-II) dated 18.6.2015 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Bellampalli Area, Goleti Township(P.O.), Adilabad Distt. in terminating the services of Sri Ramtenki Kistaiah, Ex-Badli Filler, Goleti-1 Inc., SCCo.Ltd., Bellampalli Area with effect from 1.4.2005 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 40/2015 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.
3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Non-appearance of the Petitioner and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the Petitioner has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the Petitioner is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit. Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2723ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 667-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ Çlxkjsuh dksfy;jht daiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&22012@51@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 667.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 18/04/2019.
[No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 26th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 66/2013
Between:
The General Secretary (Sri Riaz Ahmed), M/s. Singareni Mines & Engg. Workers Union (HMS), Qr.No.C-34, Sector-I, Godavarikhani – 505 209, Karimnagar District. …Petitioner Union
AND
The General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani – 505 209. Karimnagar Distt. …Respondent
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : M/s. A. Sarojana & K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent : M/s. P.A.V.V.S. Sarma & Vijaya Laxmi Panguluri, Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-22012/51/2013-IR(CM-II) dated 30.5.2013 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
''Whether the action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. In terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is justified or not? If not, to what relief the applicant is entitled for?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 66/2013 and notices were issued to the parties.
2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:
The Petitioner Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, was appointed as Staff Nurse on 4.8.1989 and was working for the M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. While so the concerned work woman has applied for 3 days leave from2724 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005 and also availed play day on 4.6.2005. But she could not report for the duty on 5.6.2005 as her father was in serious condition and her presence was very much essential and she continued to assist him regularly. In the mean while, the concerned workwoman also fell sick and her daughter Kum. Alekhya Jayanthi also fell sick. While the matters stood thus, charge sheet dated 13.12.2005 was issued to the Petitioner by the Respondents alleging that the Petitioner absented for duty during the year 2008 which amounts to misconduct under company's Standing Order No.25.25. Subsequently, one inquiry was conducted and during the time of the enquiry, the Petitioner could not submit her explanation to the charge sheet and that she could not participate in the enquiry also. As a result of which an exparte enquiry was conducted. Basing on such lopsided enquiry, the Enquiry Officer held the charges as proved and basing on the erroneous findings of the Enquiry Officer, the workwoman was dismissed from service vide order dated 31.8.2006 with effect from 7.9.2006. But without considering any of her submissions, the workwoman was dismissed from service. It is also stated that the action of the Respondents management in dismissing the Petitioner workwoman from service is wholly illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner workwoman has rendered about 17 years of continuous service in the Respondents' management. The Petitioner workwoman approached the Respondents to consider her case sympathetically, but the management did not pay any heed to it. Therefore, the Petitioner workwoman was constrained to approach this Tribunal to declare the impugned order No.CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by the 1st respondent is illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner workwoman into service duly granting all other attendant benefits such as continuity of service, back wages etc..
3. The Respondents filed counter denying the averments made in the petition, with the averments in brief
which runs as follows:
In the counter the Respondents while admitting some of the factual aspects to be true, stated that the Petitioner workwoman was appointed in the Respondents' company on 6.8.1989 as Junior Staff Nurse and was promoted to 'C' and 'B' grades on 8.9.1980 and 4.9.2000 respectively and has been working in Sector-III dispensary of the Respondents' company. It is submitted that the Petitioner workwoman was sanctioned 6 days leave for the period from 29.5.2005 to 3.6.2005. She was to report for duty on 5.6.2005, but she did not resume her duty on 5.6.2005, and has been continuously absenting from duty. She was dismissed from service on proved charges of absenteeism, after conducting a detailed domestic enquiry duly following the principles of natural justice. The Petitioner did not attend on the dates fixed for the enquiry and finally as a last chance the enquiry notice was published in the Telugu Daily Newspaper on 5.5.2006 fixing the date of enquiry, but she did not attend the enquiry on the date fixed. She was given full, fair and reasonable opportunity to defend herself. As such, an exparte enquiry was conducted purely following the principles of natural justice. It is stated that basing on the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer, he submitted his report holding the charges levelled against the Petitioner was proved. A copy of the enquiry report and the enquiry proceeding was sent to the Petitioner workwoman by way of show cause notice giving her an opportunity to make representation against the findings of the enquiry report; since the charge levelled against the Petitioner workwoman is proved and it was serious in nature, punishment warranted was dismissal from service. The Disciplinary Authority has gone through the enquiry proceeding and her past record and found that there was no extenuating circumstances to take a lenient view and lastly, the Respondents were constrained to dismiss the Petitioner workwoman from service. It is stated that in fact the Petitioner workwoman was irregular to her duties and she did not improve her attendance even after issuing charge sheet to her, and after receiving the show cause notice. It is further stated that the punishment imposed on the Petitioner workwoman is justified and legal and as such the claim petition is liable to be dismissed in limini.
4. In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the Petitioner not to contest the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted in the present case, the domestic enquiry conducted by the Respondents is held as legal and valid vide order dated 14.9.2017.
5. Both the parties have advanced their arguments under Sec.11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, in support of their claim.
6. In view of the above facts, the points for determination are:
I. Whether the action of the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is legal and justified?
II. Whether the Petitioner workwoman is entitled for reinstatement into service?
III. If not, to what other relief she is entitled?
7. Point No. I: During the course of argument, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner workwoman submitted that due to her illness, illness of her father and also her daughter, the Petitioner workwoman could not be able to attend her duty sincerely. Even in her representation the Petitioner workwoman has mentioned the above fact, but it has not been considered during the course of the enquiry and on account of absenteeism capital punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on the Petitioner workwoman. When the Petitioner workwoman has taken a stand that due to her illness, and other family problems she could not be able to attend her duties regularly and remained absent, the authority should have considered her case while imposing punishment. The[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2725 authority has not considered any of the submissions of the Petitioner workwoman, and has given capital punishment to the Petitioner workwoman when several modes of punishment are enumerated in the company's Standing Orders.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that when the Petitioner workwoman was a chronic absentee and was found guilty in the charges levelled against her, the punishment imposed by the Respondents' company is legal and proper. When the Petitioner workwoman was not sincere in her duty and failed to maintain minimum musters in a year she is not entitled to be reinstated in service.
9. In fact, due to illness the Petitioner has remained absent in her duties and a proceeding was initiated against her for her absenteeism followed by an enquiry. In the enquiry, the Petitioner workwoman did not participate and the charges levelled against the workwoman were proved. For this, capital punishment has been imposed. After dismissal of service, the workwoman has become jobless and unable to provide a square meal to her family members. She has already realised her mistake and has taken shelter in the Tribunal and is ready to provide bread and butter to her family members. When she has already realised her mistake atleast one chance should be given to her for reinstatement into service. Admittedly several modes of punishment are enumerated in company's Standing Orders. The Petitioner workwoman is a first offender and has worked more than 17 years under the Respondents. When punishment has been imposed, her past conduct has not been considered. While imposing capital punishment to his employees, the management should think of the condition of the workwoman as well as her family members, so also her past conduct. In this case, the punishment imposed by the Respondents for dismissal of service is too harsh. Therefore, it can safely be stated that the action of the management in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified.
This point is answered accordingly.
10. Point Nos. II & III: In Point No.I, it has already been discussed that the punishment of dismissal from service to Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani is not legal and justified. After dismissal of service as stated earlier, when the Petitioner workwoman has already realised her mistake and has come to the Tribunal with a prayer for her reinstatement into service she should be given a chance to serve for her family members. Now, after dismissal of service the workwoman has become jobless and she being the sole earning member of her family, is unable to provide a square meal to her family members. In such a circumstances, atleast the Petitioner workwoman should be given a chance to maintain her livelihood and to work under the Respondents' management. But, in the circumstances stated above, the workwoman is not entitled to get all the relief as claimed in her petition. But the Petitioner workwoman is entitled to be given a chance to work in the Respondents' management.
Thus, Point Nos. II & III are answered accordingly.
Result:
The action of the General Manager, M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distt. in terminating the services of Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani, Ex-Staff Nurse, Area Hospital SCCo. Ltd., Ramagundam-I Area, Godavarikhani Area w.e.f. 18.1.2000 is not justified. Proceeding No. CRP/PER/IR/D/92/4831 dated 31.8.2006 issued by Respondent No.1 is declared as illegal and is hereby set aside. It is ordered that the workwoman Smt. Chintala Swaroopa Rani be taken into service as a fresh employee i.e., Staff Nurse on initial basic pay without back wages and continuity of service, subject to medical fitness by the company Medical Board and the workwoman be kept under probation for a period of one year. The management is also directed to take an undertaking of good behaviour from the workwoman at the time of her posting.
The workwoman can not claim for her posting in the same place, where she was last employed. The workman shall have to either maintain minimum mandatory 20 musters every month or 190 musters in a year and the management shall have the right to review the work of the workman in every three months. In the event of any short fall of attendance during the period of the three months, the service of the workman will not be terminated and she will be cautioned to improve her performance by issuing her a warning letter. However, in the event of any shortfall of attendance during one year of service of the workman, she will be terminated from service without any further notice and enquiry. The management shall consider any forced absenteeism on account of Mine accidents/ Natural disasters, taking treatment in the company's hospital, as attendance. All other usual terms and conditions of appointment will be applicable i.e., transfer, hours of work, day of rest, holidays etc.. to the workman for appointment afresh.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant and corrected by me on this the 26th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer2726 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 668-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ,u-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 9@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&22015@12@2013&vkbZvkj ¼lh-,e--II½]
jktsUæ Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 668.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 9/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of NCL and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 23-04-2019.
[No. L-22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/9/2014
General Secretary, Bhartiya Koyla Khadan Shramik Sandh (BMS), Amlohri Project Branch, PO Amlohri, Distt. Sidhi (MP) …Workman
Vs.
Chief General Manager, Amlohri Project, NCL, PO Amlohri, Distt. Sidhi (MP) …Management
AWARD
Passed on this 5th day of April, 2019
1. As per letter dated 28-1-2014 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 22015/12/2013-IR(CM-II).The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the fixation of Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra by the Chief General Manager, Amlohri
Project, NCL PO Amlohri, Distt. Singrauli on his (Shri Mishra's) requested reversion due to ill-health
to the post of Driver Category-V from Dumper Operator Category Grade II was not in order as his
promotion/ upgradation were not taken into consideration. If so, what benefit Shri Madhusudan
Prasad Mishra be entitled to i.e. arrears of difference of pay and promotion?
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27272. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he submitted that he was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V on 15-5-84, promoted as dumper operator Grade II on 20-2-87 and later on he got salary to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I because he operated higher capacity machine.
3. Vide order dated 11-4-94 issued by Dy.Chief Personal Manager, Amlohri Project, he was reverted due to illness i.e. asthma which was born due to sand and dust. On 11-4-94, he was getting salary @Rs.71.43 as basic pay and after his reversion as Driver Category V, his basic pay was reduced and was fixed @ Rs.44.50. vide order dated 7-6-1999, his salary was protected on the basis of recommendation and past services and he was fixed at basic pay of Rs.104.90 per day which is related to the salary of Dumper Operator Grade II. It was also alleged that at per cadre scheme of N.C.L. the post of driver operator and car operator are of two different cadres and further that vide order dated 6/7-11-2003, workman was selected as crane operator Grade-III, and at present working as crane operator Grade I. It is the claim of workman that at the time of reversion i.e. on 11-4-94, wages of workman were fixed in the pay scale provided in NCWA-IV(National Coal Wage Agreement) and at the time of protection of pay provided in NCWA-V, hence the workman is entitled to get the difference of wages and pay for the period from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly, workman has claimed the difference of wages from 11-4-94 to 7-6-99 as per NCWA-IV & V which is about 6 lakhs.
4. In their written statement of defense, the employers admitted that the workman was initially appointed as Driver Cat-V as alleged by him and was working as dumper operator Grade I in the pay scale of 31.99-1.76- 56.63(MCWA-III) and his basic salary was fixed Rs.33.75 per day. On 29-3-94, he submitted an application before Chief General Manager stating that he was suffering from asthma and has been medically advised to avoid dust hence unable to perform the duties of dumper operator. He expressed his desire to go back on the job of Driver Cat-V for which he expressed his readiness and willingness to accept wages of Driver Category V. The management after considering his request, re-designated him as Driver Category V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic was fixed initially in the pay scale of 44.50-1.62-67.18 (NCWA-IV). His basic was fixed after re- designation in post of Driver Category V as under:-
a. Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra was appointed as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 15-6-84,
b. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Gr-II w.e.f. 20-2-87
c. Promoted to the post of Dumper Operator Grade I w.e.f. 28-2-89
d. Basic pay drawn in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I
In NCWA IV In NCWA V
1-3-92 Rs.66.19 1.3.92 Rs.98.95
1-3-93 Rs.68.81 1-3-93 Rs.103.50
1-3-94 Rs.71.43 1.3.94 Rs.108.05
A representation dated 26-8-97 by the Union in this respect on the ground that before re-designation as Driver Cat-V. workman was getting basic pay of Rs.108.05 per day in the post of Dumper Operator Grade I. This remuneration was deducted and Union was informed by the management vide letter dated 8-12-96. Workman further file a case before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate Singrauli but could not succeed. It was decided that since workman was selected for the post of dumper operator to Driver and was again re- designated as Driver hence his pay might be fixed for the post of Driver Cat-V as if he was not selected for the post of Dumper Operator and he would get increment benefit of Driver Cat-V meaning thereby he was appointed on 15-6-84 and his pay be fixed with awarding normal increment of Driver Cat V from 1-7-85 but actual monetary benefit may be given with immediate effect and no arrear will be paid consequent upon the new fitment. Also, it was decided that consequent upon placement in Cat-V, workman will not claim promotion to the post of Driver Cat-VI cum Mechanic in case his juniors were promoted. This decision was taken after prolonged discussion with the workman. Accordingly, the management prayed for rejection of his claim.
5. In his rejoinder, the workman states that copy of application of workman dated 21-3-94 Annexure M-1 filed by the employers shows that the workman only requested for change of place of duty and the employers did not pass any order on his application on Annexure M-1. Workman filed another application dated 29-3-94, copy filed by the management which he had filed at the instance & assurance of employers that his pay will be protected and it is on that application filed by the workman on assurance by the management that his pay would be protected, the employers passed order dated 11-4-94, copy filed by employers with their Written Statement of defense. Workman reiterated allegations that employers passed order dated 7-6-99 protecting his salary w.e.f. 11-4-94 but stated in the order that workman would not get the monetary benefits and no arrear arise out of fixation. This order dated 7-6-99 is illegal and discriminatory because similarly placed workman George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh, G.S.Pandey, working in other projects of the same employers have been granted pay protection.
2728 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]6. Workman has examined himself on oath and has filed 3 photocopy documents which are office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 relating to Kakri project. These orders relate to other workman R.D. Patel, B.P.Dwivedi and George Koshi as stated by him in his rejoinder.
7. Management examined Sunil Kumar Jha, General Manager of the Amlohri Project on oath and proved documents- application dated 21-3-94 & 29-3-94, office order dated 11-4-94, letter dated 8-12-97 of management sent to Union which are Exhibit M- 1 to M-4 respectively.
8. Shri S.K. Mishra appeared on behalf of workman and Shri A.K.Shashi for employer. I have heard argument of learned counsel from both the sides and have gone through the record.
9. On perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points came up for determination in the present case:-
(1) Whether the refusal of arrears regarding difference of pay/ wages during the period 11-4-94 to
7-6-99 by the management is justified in law and fact?
(2) Whether the workman is entitled to any arrear of difference of pay?
10. Point for Determination No.1-
Admitted between the parties is the fact that while workman was working as Dumper Operator Grade I, he was reverted to Driver Cat-V on his application. Date of order of reversion is 11-4-94. According to the workman, he filed an application on 21-3-94 requesting him to allot duty at another place because working as dumper operator in sand and fumes is adversely affecting his health. This application has been proved by management's witness at Exhibit M-1. Perusal of this application reveals that following order was passed on the application by management-
"Dy.CPM- please issue a letter to Shri M.P.Mishra (worker) that as dumper operator, he cannot get a place out of mine area. If he will give option for demotion to the post of Driver Cat V, he can be posted in dispensary or else where out of the mine."
This document has been admitted by the workman also. The other application filed by workman on 29-3-94, copy filed by management, admitted by workman, proved by management witness at Exhibit M-2 makes it clear that in its 2nd application, workman expressed his willingness to change his post from dumper operator to Driver and also expressed his consent and accepted hat he will accept whatever salary admissible to him as per rules on his changed place. There is an order of the management side which reads as under:-
" He should be engaged as Driver Cat-V and should also be paid wages of Driver Cat-V. he would be posted in hospital – signed on 29th March"
Exhibit M-3 proved by management's witness, admitted by the workman is the formal office order dated 11-4-94 passed by Dy.Chief Personal Officer on his application dated 29-3-94. This order reads as under:-
"Shri Madhusudhan Prasad Mishra Dumper Operator vide his application dated 29-3-94 has requested for Driver job as he is suffering from asthma disease and unable to perform duty of Dumper Operator. His request has been considered and he is hereby re-designated as Driver Cat-V w.e.f. 11-4-94 and his basic will be fixed Rs.44.50-1.63-67.18. Shri Mishra is directed to report for duty to Medical Superintendent Amlohri."
11. Workman has stated on oath that the application dated 29-3-94 was filed by him under the assurance by the management that he will be adjusted out of field duty as a Driver on the same pay and wages he was getting as Dumper Operator Grade I. Management side has denied this allegation in their written statement of defense. Hence, the burden of proving the fact that workman filed application dated 29-3-94 on the assurance given by management regarding protection of his salary and wages will be on the workman. There is nothing on record except the self serving statement of workman on this point. the office order referred to above passed on the application of workman and the endorsement of the Manager on the application of workman M-3 & M-2 respectively, do not state that his pay shall be protected after changing his job from Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V. Moreover in Para-5 of the Written Statement of the claim, workman has stated that vide order of management dated 7-6-99, his salary was protected on the basis of representation and past services and he was fixed at Rs.104.90 per day. This pay is relating to post of dumper operator Grade II. Hence, this allegation of workman where he admits that his salary was protected by order of management dated 7-6-99 shows that his grievances were redressed. As regards, payment of arrears of salary for the period between 11-4-94 to 7-6-99, there is no such order regarding payment. The point arises here is whether management was under obligation to pay arrears or not. No rule or cercular has been cited by workman which provides the management to pay arrears of pay and wages in such a situation. It is further the case of workman in his rejoinder that similarly placed other workers viz George Koshi, R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2729 and Shri G.S.Pandey were granted arrears when their cadre was changed. The management has first denied it.
12. Learned counsel for management has submitted that these workmen are not the employees of Amlohri Project rather they are employees of Kakri and other projects under different managements hence any order of the management of other project will not be binding on present employers. Learned counsel for workman has rebutted this argument with submission that all projects are owned and managed by NCL hence simply because the projects are different, no discrimination can be done in similar circumstances as it has been done in the case in hand which requires to be rectified.
13. Point further arises that whether workman has successfully proved this fact in the case in hand or not. Perusal of record reveals that application was filed by workman directing the management to produce the service records of R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi. The management opposed this application stating that their service records are not with them because these workers are employees of different projects and their service records are maintained in the office of that project. This application for summoning document was dismissed by my learned predecessor that the management in the case in hand cannot be directed to produce these service records because the records were not in their possession and control. Workman could file an application for summoning the records from the offices where they were maintained but he did not do so hence a simple self serving statement of workman that in similar cases of cadre change, arrears of difference in salary were given to Shri B.K.Singh, George Koshi and R.D.Patel, which is not supported by any document is not sufficient to prove this assertion of workman. Moreover, there is on record photocopy of office order dated 30-9-91, 18-2-89 & 9-1-99 which is inadmissible because it has not been proved. These 3 documents are office orders subsequent upon change of cadre of employees R.D.Patel, B.K.Singh and George Koshi Even in these inadmissible documents,there is no order regarding payment of arrears of difference of wages rather it has been specifically denied to them. Hence, in such a circumstance, and in the light of facts and evidence as mentioned above, there is nothing on record to hold that management was not justified in refusing arrears of difference of pay to the workman for the period 11-4-94 to 7-6-99. Accordingly it is held that refusal of management to pay arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his change of cadre from post of dumper operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is not unjustified in law or fact. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.
14. Point for Determination No.2-
In the light of my finding in Point No.1, this point is answered in negative holding that the workman is not entitled to any relief.
15. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management in not paying arrear of pay to the workman subsequent to his
change of cadre from post of Dumper Operator Grade I to Driver Cat-V is proper and legal.
(2) Workman Shri Madhusudan Prasad Mishra is not entitled to any relief.
16. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.
Dated: 5-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 669-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ lSUVªy cSad vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 92@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@62@2013&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh2730 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 669.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Central Bank of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26.04.2019.
[No. L-12012/62/2013-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOR COURT,
JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/92/2013
Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas, Ward No.4, Maa Baba Chowk, Bahmni Banjer, Mandla (MP) …Workman
Versus
Sr. Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, 601, Napier Town, Jabalpur (MP) …Management
AWARD
Passed on this 3rd day of April, 2019
1. As per letter dated 30-9-2013 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/62/2013-IR(B-II). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of
Shri Vinod Kumar Srivas is legal and justified? What relief the claimant is entitled for and from which
date?"
2. In his statement of claim, the applicant workman has stated that he was appointed/ entered in the service of the employer Bank in Bahmni Banjer Branch on 6-4-2002 as peon cum safai worker and worked till 12-2- 2013 without any break in service. At the time of his termination, he was paid fixed wages @ Rs.1850 per month. He discharged his duties faithfully and diligently like any permanent employee, worked even on holidays and had completed more than 240 days in each calendar year for about 11 years continuously. He was initially paid Rs.740 per month which was raised up to Rs.1850 per month during the course of his employment. The post on which the workman was working was regular in nature. Vacancies for the post were advertised. Workman also submitted his application, to be forwarded to Regional Office of the employer Bank but it was not sent in time due to malafide on the part of employers depriving him an opportunity to appear in the selection process for the vacancies. He agitated against this and the Branch Manager of the employer Bank terminated his services verbally from 12-2-2013. He had worked 240 days in the year preceding the date of his termination. No notice or salary was given to him hence the termination is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act, is also violative of principles of natural justice hence amounting to illegal retrenchment, victimization and unfair labor practice. It was also alleged that after his termination, workman has been out of gainful employment and has been unable to get job anywhere. His family is living in starvation because he is the only earning member of the family. Accordingly, the workman has prayed for declaring illegal and setting aside his termination and direction to employers to reinstate him with full backwages.
3. In their Written Statement of defense, employers have flatly denied the allegation that the workman was ever employed by them in any capacity. It was also pleaded that he was neither engaged as a daily wager or part time worker of the Bank. He was not an employee of the Bank. Bank never directed him to work in any Branch of the Bank. There is no relationship of workman and employer between the parties hence there is no question of his completing 240 days in employment/ engagement of the employer Bank preceding the date of his termination. Also, it was pleaded that the Bank issued publication on 2-11-2012 in newspaper regarding vacancies of Safaikarmchari and peon but the application of the workman could not reach to its Regional Office in time hence he was not considered. There has been no violation of Section 25-F or any provision of ID Act. Accordingly, it has been prayed that the claim of the workman be dismissed as such.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27314. In evidence, workman filed peon book (7 pages), payment vouchers (4 pages), written application to Regional office of the Bank regarding his application w.r.t. vacancies ( 1 page), certificate issued by Branch Manager alongwith the application (1 page each). Letter of Branch Manager dated 28-11-2011(2 pages), all admitted by employers marked Exhibit W-1 to W-6 respectively. Workman also filed copy of communication dated 23-2-2013 issued by Bank to him stating the reasons of non-consideration of his application. In the recruitment process with regard to vacancies advertised which is also admitted by employers is Exhibit W-7. Workman examined himself on oath and was cross-examination by employers.
5. The management examined its witness Shri Sumil Goel, Branch Manager on oath, who was cross-examined by workman. The management also filed payment vouchers, 8 in number, attendance sheet (14 pages), peon book ( 64 pages). All admitted by workman except attendance sheet marked Exhibit M-1 & M-2 respectively.
6. I have heard argument of Shri Arun Patel, learned counsel for workman and Shri Avinash Dey, Learned counsel for management and have also gone through the record.
7. From the perusal of record in the light of rival argument, following points for determination arise in the case in hand-
(1) Whether the termination/dis-engagement of services of workman is justified in law?
(2) If the answer of Ist point is in Negative, whether the workman is entitled to any relief?
8. Point for Determination No.1-
Respective pleadings of the parties on this point have already been detailed earlier. Workman has examined himself on oath. In his affidavit, he has stated that he was engaged as pen from safai worker on 6-4-2002 & since then, has been continuously working upto 12-2-13 at Bahmni Banjer Branch of the employer Bank. He was paid wages regularly through payment vouchers, some of the vouchers have been filed by him. He further stated that he was assigned work daily including Dak distribution to the Bank's customers. Copy of the peon book has been filed by him. He also states that his services were terminated without giving notice or without assigning any reason from 13-2-2013 by a verbal order which is against law and since then he is not gainfully employed any where. He has denied that he was called for work only when the Bank required his services and has stated in his cross-examination that he was regularly kept in engagement and had worked for 240 days in the year preceding his dis-engagement. Workman has filed and proved peon book (copy) which is in 7 pages, admitted by employer. It goes to show that he has distributed various mails to various people/ persons within a period from 5-3-2002 to 16-3-2007 on different dates. Payment vouchers (copy) total 4 pages, filed by workman admitted by the employers which is Exhibit W-2 goes to show that he has been paid wages during the period of 7-1-2003 to 1-8-2007 at different dates as casual worker with the Bank. Workman has further filed and proved an application and certificate dated 7-11-2012, issue by the Bank certifying that he worked for more than 45 days in the year 2002-03. Employers have admitted these two documents. This certificate was issued by employers in relation to an application (copy on record), about which the workman has stated that he had submitted application regarding recruitment w.r.t. vacancies advertised,which was not forwarded by the Branch to the Regional office. Management's witness Sumit Goel, Branch Manager has stated on oath that workman was never an employee of the Bank nor was he appointed by any officer of the Bank. His averment that he was peon cum safai worker at Bahmni Banjer Branch from 6-4-2002 to 12-2-2013 is baseless because he was not appointed in the Bank nor was engaged as daily wager or part time worker with the Branch. It was also stated that since he was not in engagement of the management Bank therefore he was not directed at any point of time to discharge any duty and there was no question of completing 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged dis-engagement hence benefit of Section 25-F is not available to him regarding not forwarding his application for recruitment regarding vacancies in the year 2012, the witness states that his candidature was not considered because his application was not received by the Regional office of the Bank before the last date fixed for filing applications. Also, it was stated by the witness that since there was no relation of employer and employee, at any point of time between parties, the provisions of I.D. Act, 1947 are not applicable in the case at hand.
9. In his cross-examination, management witness has stated that the documents (referred to above) filed by the workman have been admitted by management employers. This witness also admits that no notice or compensation was given to him before his disengagement. It is strange that the document filed by management itself rebut the oral statement of management's witness Exhibit M-1 which is of 8 pages is the payment voucher regarding payment made to the workman by the Bank. These vouchers are of date 3-1- 2012, 2-3-12, 18-4-12, 1-5-12, 2-6-12, 3-7-12, 4-9-12, 6-10-12. It is specifically mentioned in these vouchers that these are wages of daily wager workman Vinod Kumar Srivas. Learned counsel for employment submits that even if it be taken that the workman was paid through these vouchers because he worked with the2732 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Branch or was engaged with the Branch, these vouchers donot prove him in engagement for 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged disengagement. Payment voucher of March 12 establishes that workman had worked in February 2012 for which payment was made in March and same is the case with other vouchers. Hence, these 7 payment vouchers establish the case of the workman that he was engaged for 7 months i.e. for 210 days with the Bank. Regarding his engagement for other period, management has itself filed peon book which is 64 pages marked Exhibit M-2. The peon book(copy) Exhibit M-2- page 27,28 & 29 as well as 30 show that the workman has distributed different mails in the month of May. Similarly peon book Exhibit M-2 Page 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 & 41 also establish that he has distributed various mails on different dates to different persons on behalf of Bank.
10. Learned counsel for management has tried to discredit these documents, though filed by the management itself, with a ground that these documents donot contain full signature of the workman in the column of the person who has delivered the mail but I am not inclined to accept these argument because in every document right from statement of claim to statement of oath on other documents, the initials of the workman are same hence these M-2 document further establish that workman has also worked in the month of May and July for which, particularly for the month of July, the payment vouchers has been with held by the management. accordingly the evidence produced by the workman regarding his claim that he completed 240 days preceding date of his termination appears more reliable than the barred statement of management's witness, contradicted by the documents produced by the management itself, that workman was never in engagement at any time with the Bank. On the basis of above discussion, the fact that workman had completed 240 days in the year preceding his date of disengagement is held proved. Also the fact that workman has been engagement of the management Bank since April 2002 as casual worker on whole time basis, discharging the duties of mail messenger and other duties till date of his disengagement is also held proved.
11. Reference of Section 25-F of ID Act is also necessary which reads as under:-
Section 25-F: Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until-
(a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice: 1[***]
(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of six months; and
(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government 3[or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette."
12. Learned counsel for workman referred to case of Director, Fisheries Terminal Division versus Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Chavda reported in AIR-2010 SSC-1236. Para-14 & 15 of this judgment requires to be mentioned here which are being reproduced as under:-
This court in the case of R.M. Yellatty vs. Assistant Executive Engineer [(2006) 1 SCC 106], has observed
"However, applying general principles and on reading the aforesaid judgments, we find that this Court, has repeatedly taken the view that the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that he had worked for 240 days in a given year. This burden is discharged only upon the workman stepping up in the witness box. This burden is discharged upon the workman adducing cogent 9 evidence, both oral and documentary. In cases of termination of services of daily-waged earners, there will be no letter of appointment of termination. There will also be no receipt of proof of payment. Thus in most cases, the workman (the claimant) can only call upon the employer to produce before the Court the nominal muster roll for the given period, the letter of appointment of termination, if any, the wage register, the attendance register, etc. Drawing of adverse inference ultimately would depend thereafter on the facts of each case."
15) Applying the principles laid down in the above case by this court, the evidence produced by the appellants has not been consistent. The appellants claim that the respondent did not work for 240 days. The respondent was a workman hired on a daily wage basis. So, it is obvious, as this court pointed out in the above case that he would have difficulty in having access to all the official documents, muster rolls etc. in connection with his service. He has come forward and deposed, so in our opinion the burden of proof shifts to the employer/appellants to prove that he did not complete 240 days of service in the requisite period to constitute continuous service. It is the contention of the appellant that the services of the respondent were terminated in 1988. The witness produced by the appellant stated that the respondent stopped coming to work[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2733 from 10 February, 1988. The documentary evidence produced by the appellant is contradictory to this fact as it shows that the respondent was working during February, 1989 also. It has also been observed by the High Court that the muster roll for 1986-87 was not completely produced. The appellants have inexplicably failed to produce the complete records and muster rolls from 1985 to 1991, inspite of the direction issued by the labor court to produce the same. In fact, there has been practically no challenge to the deposition of the respondent during cross-examination. In this regard, it would be pertinent to mention the observation of three judge bench of this court in the case of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Siri Niwas [(2004) 8 SCC 195], where it is observed: "A Court of Law even in a case where provisions of the Indian Evidence Act apply, may presume or may not presume that if a party despite possession of the best evidence had not produced the same, it would have gone against this contentions. The matter, however, would be different where despite direction by a court the evidence is withheld.
On the basis of above discussion, it is held that dis-engagement of services of workman Vinod Kumar
Srivas from 12-2-2013 is violative of Section 25-F of ID Act and is untenable in law. Point No.1 is
answered accordingly.
13. Point for determination No.2-
In the light of finding w.r.t. Point No.1, point remains for determination is to what relief, the workman is entitled? Learned counsel for workman has relied on case law Tapas Kumar Paul versus BSNL and another reported in 2014(4)-SCR-875 and has submitted that since the retrenchment of the workman has not been found legal, hence he requires to be reinstated as prayed by him in the facts and circumstances of the case at hand. The Apex Court has laid down certain guidelines to be considered in substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding compensation. These are -
"It is no doubt true that a Court may pass an order substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding compensation but the same has to be based on justifiable grounds viz.
(I) where the industry is closed;
(II) where the employee has superannuated or going to retire shortly and no period of service is left to his credit;
(III) where the workman has been rendered incapacitated to discharge the duties and cannot be reinstated and / or
(IV) when he has lost confidence of the Management to discharge duties. What is sought to be emphasized is that there may be appropriate case on facts which may justify substituting the order of reinstatement by award of compensation, but that has to be supported by some legal and justifiable reasons indicating why the order of reinstatement should be allowed to be substituted by award of compensation.
The same principles have been laid down in case of Deepali Gundu Surwase versus Kranti Junior AdhyapakMahavidyalaya and others reported in 2013(1) SCC-324.
14. In recent case, Civil Appeal no. 124-125 of 2019 decided by Apex Court on 7-1-2019 also requires to be mentioned in this respect. Para-11 of said judgment is being reproduced as under:-
It is apposite to reproduce what this Court has held in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra):
"33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgments that the ordinary principle of grant of reinstatement with fullback wages, when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in allcases. While that may be a position whereservices of a regular/permanent workman areterminated illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimization, unfair labor practice, etc. However, when it comes to the case of termination of a dailywage worker and where the termination is found illegal because of a procedural defect, namely, in violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, this Court is consistent in taking the view that in such cases reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and instead the workman should be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for shifting in this direction is obvious.
34. The reasons for denying the relief ofreinstatement in such cases are obvious. It istrite law that when the termination is foundto be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services ofthat employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has noright to seek regularisation [see State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)17]. Thus when he cannot claim regularisation and he has noright to continue even2734 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to beserved in reinstating such a workman and hecan be given monetary compensation by theCourt itself inasmuch as if he is terminatedagain after reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form ofretrenchment compensation and notice pay.
In such a situation, giving the relief ofreinstatement, that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.
"35. We would, however, like to add a caveathere. There may be cases where terminationof a daily wage worker is found to be illegalon the ground that it was resorted to asunfair labor practice or in violation of the principle of last come first go viz. whileretrenching such a worker daily wage juniorsto him were retained. There may also be asituation that persons junior to him wereregularised under some policy but theworkman concerned terminated. In suchcircumstances, the terminated worker shouldnot be denied reinstatement unless there aresome other weighty reasons for adopting thecourse of grant of compensation instead ofreinstatement. In such cases, reinstatementshould be the rule and only in exceptionalcases for the reasons stated to be in writing,such a relief can be denied."
Now considering the claim of reinstatement of the workman in the light of principles of law laid down in the referred cases from the evidence on record, it is proved that the workman has been in engagement of the management Bank since April 2002. He has specifically stated on oath that he has not been in gainful engagement since after the date of his disengagement and there is no rebuttal by employers. This is established that he has passed the period of his life in which he could be eligible or could apply for any other employment as he has crossed that age during his this engagement also that he has not reached the age of superannuation or has not been incapacitated by any intervening disability to continue in engagement. In these circumstances, it is just and proper and in the ends of justice if he is reinstated on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date of his disengagement till date of reinstatement.Accordingly, the workman is held entitled to be reinstated on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % back wages and all consequential benefits from the date of his disengagement till date of reinstatement.
Point No.2 is decided accordingly.
In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of the Central Bank of India in terminating the services of Shri
Vinod Kumar Srivas is not legal and justified.
(2) The management of Central Bank of India is directed to reinstate workman Vinod Kumar Srivas
on the position as it was on the date of his disengagement but with 50 % backwages from the date
of his disengagementwith all consequential benefits till date of reinstatement.
Amount as per above order shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award. In case of default, amount shall carry 9% interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.
Dated : 3-4-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 670-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ cSad vkWQ cMkSnk ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] u- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 94@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&39025@01@2019&vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2735
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 670.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 94/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Bank of Baroda and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 26/04/2019.
[No. L-39025/01/2019-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS
COMPLEX : NEW DELHI
ID No. 94/2014
Smt. Kamla Devi w/o. Shri Makhan Lal Through Delhi Karamchari Union (Regd.) 52-C, Okha Estate Phase-3, New Delhi 110020. r/o. 8/3 G-Block, Sangam Vihar, New Delhi 110062. …Workman/Claimant
Versus
The Branch Manager Bank of Baroda, L-43, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019. …Management
AWARD
This Award shall decided a claim petition directly filed by the claimant under Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short "the Act") with the averments that the claimant Smt. Kamla Devi had been working as Safai Karamchari since January, 2011 with Management Bank at its Kalkajit Branch and her drawn wages were Rs.6000/- per month. She always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy. She was neither given any appointment letter, nor minimum wages and over time, casual leave etc., though the claimant made demand for the same. The Management terminated the services of the claimant on 3/10/2013 without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act. It is pleaded that the Management used to get signatures of the claimant on blank vouchers and plain papers which the claimant had done under pressure as the Management used to extend threat of terminating her services time and again. The Management even did not pay to her earned wages for the months of August, September and October, 2013. A demand notice dated 7/10/2013 was sent to the Management but to no response. The claimant thereafter approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail . The workman/claimant is unemployed since the day of termination of her services by the Management, though she made efforts to find a job.
2. The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed its written statement and took preliminary objections inter-alia that there is no employer-employee relationship between the claimant and the Management, as the claimant never worked with the Management since its opening in the year 2012. It is alleged that claim of the claimant to the effect that she started working at Kalkaji Branch of the Bank since January, 2011, is false inasmuch as Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on 22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. All other averments made by the claimant regarding obtaining her signatures on blank vouchers/papers and/or payment of less wages have been totally denied by the Management.
3) The claimant/workman filed rejoinder wherein she denied all the allegations made by the Management and reiterated her own case as set up in the claim petition.
4) On the pleadings of the parties, this Tribunal vide order dated 28/04/2016 framed following issues :-
(i) Whether termination of the workman with effect from 3/10/2013 is arbitrary and illegal and the workman is liable to be reinstated as alleged ?
(ii) Whether Kalkaji branch of the Management was opened on 31/3/2012 ? If so, its effect ?
2736 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](iii) Whether the workman has never worked in Kalkaji Branch, as alleged and as such there was no relationship of employer-employee between the parties ?
6) The Claimant in support of her case examined herself as W.W.1 and tendered her affidavit Ex.WW1/A alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/3.
7) On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Aditya Ravi, Chief Manager of Management who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/3.
8) I have carefully gone through the evidence adduced on record by both the parties and have give my thoughtful consideration to rival contentions of Shri B.S.Rawat, A./R for the claimant and Shri B.S.Chauhan, A/R for the Management. My findings on above issues are as follows.
Issue No.2 :-
9. Onus to prove this issue was upon the Management, inasmuch as it was alleged by the Management that claim of the claimant that she had started working with the Management Bank from January, 2011 is incorrect because Kalkaji Branch of the Bank was opened (soft launch) only on 31/3/2012 and was formally inaugurated only on 22/9/2012, because premises on Ground Floor, L-43 Kalkaji was taken on lease w.e.f. 1/4/2012 and permission was obtained from South MCD vide letter dated 8/8/2012. To prove its case, the Management examined MW1- Mr.Aditya Ravi who has filed on record copy of the lease deed in respect of premises where Kalkaji Branch was opened viz. ground floor of L-43 Kalkaji New Delhi as Ex.MW1/1, which goes to show that premises in question was leased to the Management Bank w.e.f.1/4/2012 for a term of 10 years. MW 2 Ankit Palta, another witness of the Management has filed on record copy of the letter dated 15/3/2012 of Reserve Bank of India as Ex.MW2/3 which shows that MICR code in respect of Kalkaji Branch was allotted to the Management Bank by the Reserve Bank of India. No contrary thereto has been adduced by the claimant. The aforesaid documents substantiate the plea of the Management that Kalkji Branch was opened (soft lunched) on 31/3/2012. Consequently, the plea of the claimant that she had started working with the Management from January, 2011 is not acceptable. This issue is decided accordingly in favour of the Management.
Issue No. 3 :-
10. Ld. A/R appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the Management & claimant as she never worked with the Management what to talk from January,2011. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant to prove that she was in the employment of the Management Bank and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year.
10) Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimant submitted during the course of arguments that the claimant was working as Part Time Sweeper with the Management Bank since 2012 though claimant due to illiteracy and ignorance of exact date, averred in the claim petition that she was engaged in January, 2011. It was also submitted that services of the claimant were illegally terminated on 3/10/2013.
12- There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.
12- This Tribunal has to consider the oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on record so as to decide the question of relationship of employer and employee between the Management and the claimant herein. In this respect, it is appropriate to refer to the affidavit ExWW1/A of the claimant. It is clear from the perusal of the affidavit Ex.WW1/A that it is in consonance with the pleadings i.e. statement of claim filed by the claimant. It is the specific case of the Management that the claimant never worked with the Management at any point of time. MW1 Aditya Ravi clarified in his cross examination that he had taken charge of the post of Branch Manager of Kalkaji Branch (which was a new branch) on 1st May, 2012 and at that time there was no official/Safai Karamchari at the said branch. He volunteered that cleaning (of bank premises) was taken care of by the landlord. Thereafter Shri Neeru was posted by the competent authority to clean the branch. He admitted that he has not filed on record any document to show that Shri Neeru was engaged as sub-staff (for cleaning the bank premises). He also admitted that vouchers Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-19 bear his signatures and tried to explain that payment shown in those vouchers are with respect to cleaning of fans, computers, Air conditioners, telephones, FAX machines including sweeping etc., However, a careful perusal of these vouchers (Ex.MW1/W-1 to Ex.MW1/W-9) shows that these have been drawn for "sundry charges" regarding payment made towards sweeping of the bank premises. First voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 (dated 30/6/2012) is[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2737 towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamla; second voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/8/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Kamlesh; third voucher Ex.MW1/W-2 (dated 1/9/2012) is towards payment of Rs.1600/- made to Maya; Similarly are the other vouchers showing payment of sweeping charges made to different persons named as Sarabjit, Manju Devi, Geeta Devi, Kamni, Anita, Gaya Lal, Mohan, Jai Kishan, Gopal, Jogi, Raju, Mr. Mohan, Geeta, Raju, Jogi, Raju and last voucher dated 17/12/13 for Rs.900/- is in the name of Gopi. The plea of the Management that the claimant never worked with it any any point of time is belied from the document/payment voucher Ex.MW1/W-1 which payment has been made in favour of the claimant Smt.Kamla. It is common knowledge that the payment through vouchers is made by the Banks to the workers engaged on part time basis including Part Time Sweeper for sweeping and dusting the bank premises and further that, the Branch Manager concerned has been given powers to engage such workers.
13- It is a matter of record that an application under Section 11(3)(b) of the Act filed on behalf of the claimant was partly allowed by this Tribunal and Management Bank was directed to produce certain documents vis-à-vis Name of the Safai Karamchari/Chowkidar alongwith wage slip, mode of payment etc. The Management failed to produce the said documents excepting the payment vouchers and as such, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the Management for non production of such documents. It is very astonishing that payment towards sweeping charges has been debited by the Management Bank through monthly vouchers but in different names. The Management Bank has neither explained as to why vouchers have been issued in different names, nor has filed details of such Part Time Sweepers engaged by it. It appears that same has been done just to deprive the claimant to seek other facilities. In the circumstances, I find force in the submission of the claimant that she always worked with honesty and dedication but the Management took advantage of her illiteracy and did not issue her any appointment letter. I am of the opinion that the there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein and that the claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till 30/9/2013 and that her services were terminated by the Management on 3/10/2013. Consequently, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the claimant is a "workman" within the definition of Section 2(S) of the Act even if she was engaged on part time basis. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.
There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person
employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one
employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty
for fixed hours is not a workman.
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.
14. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is held that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and claimant herein. This issue is accordingly decided in favour of the claimant and against the Management.
Issue No.1 :-
15- The vital question for consideration is as to whether termination of the claimant is illegal and against the provisions of the Act. Testimony of the claimant that the Management terminated her services on 3/10/2013 without any notice, warning or charge sheet and in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, has gone unassailed and unchallenged, inasmuch as the case of the Management was that the claimant was never employed/engaged by it. However, this Tribunal while deciding issue No.3 has already held that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and the claimant and further that, claimant worked with the Management at least w.e.f. 30/6/2012 till the date of her termination on 3/10/2013. Admittedly, the Management bank has not issued any notice to the claimant before ordering her termination, nor has paid one month's salary in lieu of such notice as required under Section 25-F of the Act. I may mention that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act which provides for conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen, are absolute and inexorable and it reads as under :-
"25-F : Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen –
No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until –2738 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (a) The workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice;
(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed years of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months; and
(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette."
The above provision makes it clear that the employer is required to give notice to the appropriate Government apart-from giving one month's notice in writing or one month's wages in lieu of the notice and payment of retrenchment compensation to the concerned workman.
There is long line of decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of Section 25- F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render whole action of the Management Bank to be illegal and wrong under the law. As such, it is held that action of the Management in terminating/disengaging the services of the claimant herein was unjustified and illegal.
16) Now the residual question arises for consideration is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. There is pleading in the claim petition as well as evidence to the effect that the workman is unemployed since the day of her termination and has got no source of her livelihood.. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that she is in a position to make her both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or ad-hoc work to make her both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment. But at the same time this Tribunal can not ignore the fact that there is no positive evidence on record to prove that the claimant was regular employee of the Management bank or that she had applied for the post pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Bank or that her name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Latest trend itself discernable from the various pronouncements made by the Hon'ble Apex Court is that when a person has been engaged on daily wage basis or for doing temporary kinds of work, in that situation full back wages are not be awarded. There are number of factors which are required to be considered by the Tribunal while considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad Vs. Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under :-
" Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal, because of non payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation.
17) Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant, an amount of Rs.1 lakh (Rupees One Lakh) appears to be just and reasonable, and the same is payable to the claimant herein by the Management. In case this compensation amount is not paid within one month from the date of publication of this Award, then the claimant will be entitled to recover the same alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization of the amount.
Award is passed accordingly.
Date : 2/4/2019
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2739 ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 671-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eSlwj feujYl fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 96@2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&29012@22@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 671 .—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 96/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Mysre Minerals Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-29012/22/2007-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
BANGALORE
DATED : 10TH APRIL 2019
PRESENT : Justice Smt. Rathnakala, Presiding Officer
C.R No. 96/2007
I Party
II Party
The Managing Director, Mysore Minerals Limited, No. 39, M.G. Road, Bangalore – 560001.
Smt. Shirumaniyamma, W/o Late Munuswamy, Valagerehalli Village & Post, Bagur Hobli, Channarayapatna Taluk HASSAN DIST. Karnataka.
Advocate for I Party : Advocate for II Party:
Mr. K.T. Govinde Gowda Mr. L. Venkatarama Reddy
AWARD
The Central Government vide Order No.L-29012/22/2007-IR(M) dated 21.08.2007 in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) and Sub-Section2(A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute act, 1947 (for brevity 'the Act' hereafter) referred the following Industrial Dispute for adjudication.
"Whether the management of Mysore Minerals Limited is justified in terminating the services/
premature superannuating of the services of Smt. Shirumaniyamma w.e.f. 28.06.1998? If not, to what
relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The claim brought before this Tribunal by the 1st party is :—
She joined the service of the 2nd Party Management on 12.08.19977 at its Mining Unit viz., Byrapura Chromite Mines, Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan District, as a Mining Worker under token No. 203. At the time of joining service she furnished her age as 30 years, her Date of Birth being 12.08.1947 as per the Horoscope, her age was accepted without Certificate of Registration of Birth, in all the statutory records like EPF, B-Register, Service Record same age is registered, she was entitled to continue in the service of the 2nd Party up to 12.08.2005. The 2nd Party conducted Medical Examination illegally and removed her from service; she was orally refused employment w.e.f 28.06.1998 by assigning reason that, she has passed 58 years. Some of the Co-worker who were similarly removed from service approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka and by the order of the Hon'ble High Court the Management reinstated the pre-matured retired employees. At that point of time about 100 Mining workers were removed from service on Medical ground. They have not changed her Date of Birth in the Official records, 3 months notice was not issued to her neither 3 months salary was paid to her. The 2nd Party acted contrary to its own Certified Standing Order. Hence, the prayer for reinstatement with continuity of service and with full back wages.
2740 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]2. The claim allegation is countered by the Management succinctly stating that, the dispute filed after 10 years from the date of termination of service is time barred, she was given 30 days time to prefer appeal before the Appellate Medical Board as per rules, she did not avail the opportunity, she waited for the result of the case filed by the Co- workers who had approached the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. The success of W.P. No. 5615/2001 and 26101/2001 before the Hon'ble High Court Karnataka inspired her to file this dispute after lapse of 10 years.
3. Further, it is stated that the 2nd Party arranged for Medical Examination for all employees and workers during the year 1997-98 as required under Mines Rules 1995, which is a requirement under law. A team of qualified and senior Medical Officers from Hutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd., were specifically entrusted to carry out Medical Examination; the 1st Party was found incapacitated to work in Mine, since she was 58 year on the date of Medical Examination. Hence, the 2nd Party decided to terminate her service; without filling appeal she opted to receive monetary benefits arising from the termination. She has received the terminal benefit without any protest, now she has no right to raise the dispute. There is no relationship of employer and employee between the parties. Hence, the reference is not maintainable and this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the reference.
4. After completion of the pleadings, both parties have adduced their evidence.
5. The Management adduced evidence through its Assistant Manager, he produced photo copy of the B-Register maintained by the 2nd Party, according to which her Date of Birth is 12.08.1947. During his cross-examination the documents confronted to him from the 1st Party were identified and marked as Ex W-1 to Ex W-6; Ex W-1 is the Medical Report in Form 'O'; as per the same she is declared medically unfit due to overage, Ex W-3 is the order passed in a W.P filed by the similarly placed workmen whereby the Hon'ble High Court ordered the Authorities not to change the Date of Birth of the petitioner in the Service Register without adopting the procedure known under the law; Ex W-5 is another W.P by similarly placed workmen whereby the order passed by the Respondent was quashed and Ex W-6 is the Office Order extending the superannuation of its employees from 58 to 60 years.
6. Further, MW-1 admits that, the 1st Party workman was treated as daily wager and they have not provided working conditions as per the Mining Act. In his affidavit evidence he had averred that, as per the request made by the employees union the 2nd Party conducted the medical examination through qualified senior Medical Officer but, during cross examination he stated that, Tri-partite Settlement was made in the year 1998, it was between the Management, Mysore Minerals Employees Association and Director of Mines Safety; he experienced ignorance to the question that Mysore Minerals Employees Association represents only Clerical Staff.
7. It was further admitted by MW-1 that, despite having technical persons and machinery, in the year 1995 – 1996 2nd Party entrusted its work to Private Party and the Company suffered loss of about 21 Crores in Shimoga and Hassan District; having suffered loss the management thought of reducing the number of workers and at that juncture management ordered for Medical Examination of all the Mining Workers. It is further brought forth in his evidence that as per the Certified Standing Order of the 2nd Party Clause 18 and 24 any termination has to be followed by enquiry along with 3 months notice pay, but they had not paid 3 months salary to her; he also admits that as per Clause 18.3 of CDPR Rules change in the Date of Birth as entered in the company Records can only be effected on the Judgment of a Competent Court otherwise the Date of Birth once recorded will not be changed, he also admits that, the termination order was not attached with the copy of the Medical Certificate. Further, he admits that before removing 500 employees on the basis of medical ground, permission was not taken from the Central Government under Industrial Dispute Act. No steps were taken by the Company to obtain the permission from the Labour Ministry or Labour Secretary; he also admits that, 1st Party is a illiterate person and he was not furnished with Kannada version/translation of Medical Report.
8. The 1st Party/WW-1 during the cross-examination admitted that, she raised the dispute after the W.P filed by a co-worker was allowed and he was reinstated by the 2nd Party as per the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka.
9. By now it is clear that, for changing the Date of Birth of the 1st Party workman 2nd Party did not have either an order from the Competent Court of a Scientific Report of her age to disqualify her has unfit. Only ailment mentioned in Medical Certificate in Form-O is 'overage'; the mode adopted by them to remove other similarly placed workman is thwarted by the Hon'ble High Court and those persons were reinstated to their original post. Due to her termination on the ground of medical unfitness 1st Party workman lost 7 years of service. Though it is said that, she could have fought against the management before the Appellate Authority, one shall be reminded that, she is an illiterate, manual worker and the Medical Certificate issued to her was in English Language, and it is highly possible that she was unaware of niceties of law. Another drawback in the case of the 2nd Party is at that point of time they had removed 500 workers without obtaining permission by the Appropriate Government of the Chapter V-A of the Act, specifically in violation of sections 25F, G, H and N 2 of the Act. As admitted by the workman, she has raised the Industrial Dispute after her colleagues won the battle against the management before the Hon'ble High Court. However, it is the settled position of law that Articled 137 of the Schedule of Limitation Act is not applicable to the Industrial Dispute Act for raising the dispute.
10. Now the question is the relief that, the 1st Party is entitled to get. She has crossed the age of superannuation long back; she has raised the dispute after a delay of 6 years. Keeping a holistic view of the matter, in my considered opinion a lump sum compensation would equalise the situation; arithmetical calculation of the retrenchment calculated in accordance with Section 25-F(b) 1 month notice pay + retrenchment compensation i.e., 15 days average pay for every[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2741 completed year of continuous service or any part thereon, in case of 6 months will not condone the illegality committed by the 2nd Party. Having regard to the length of time spent the expense incurred by her in prosecuting the case, I am of the view that a lump sum compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- would be appropriated relief for her. Hence, the following
AWARD
The reference is accepted. 2nd Party is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the 1st Party
workman within 60 days from today otherwise the amount shall carry future interest of 8% per annum.
(Dictated, corrected and signed by me on 10st April, 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 672-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 15@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@5@2008&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 672.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 15/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the Employers in relation to the management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-26011/5/2008-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
DATED : 1st APRIL 2019 PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
C R No.15/2009
I Party
II Party
The General Manager, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, CHICKMAGALUR.
The General Secretary, Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union, AITUC Tamil Colony, CHICKMAGALUR.
Appearances
I Party : Shri Muralidhara, Advocate
II Party : Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate
1. The Central Government vide order No.L-26011/5/2008-IR(M) dated 04.03.2009 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as "The Act") (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication of the following Industrial Dispute:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of M/s. Allied Construction Company in denying bonus to their workers for the year 2003 – 2004 is justified? If not, to what relief these workers are entitled to? Whether the management of Kudremukh Iron ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, as a Principal Employer, is responsible to pay bonus for the year 2003 – 2004 to the contract workers employed by its contractor M/s Allied Construction Company in the event of failure on the part of the said contractor to pay bonus for the said period to these workers? If so, to what relief the workers are entitled?"2742 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. The claim set forth by the 1stParty is, the 2ndParty management is the Principle Employer and they worked under the Contractor; the contractor has employed 75 workers for the works to carry out by the Principle Employer. The workers continued to work under different contractors. During 2000 – 2001 they were working under Alpha Tech Nirman Private Limited, who replaced the earlier contractor; without break the workmen have continued to work; they are entitled for bonus for the year 2003 – 2004; they are paid bonus for the financial years 1998 - 1999, 1999 – 2000, the earlier contractor used to pay bonus in the form of exgratia, adhoc amount etc., they have worked continuously for the year 2003 – 2004, hence, entitled for bonus for the said period. II Party earned profit for the year 2003 – 2004. Thus, they are entitled for maximum bonus, they are denied statutory bonus of 8.33 %. The Principle Employer is responsible to ensure payment of statutory bonus but it has failed to comply its legal obligations. Hence, prayer for a direction to the 2nd Party to pay @ 20 % Bonus to the workman employed by them for the financial year 2003 – 2004 with a further direction to Principle Employer to pay the said amount.
3. 2nd Party contested the claim; they have stated that it is not responsible for payment of bonus or any benefit. As per the work order in favour of II party, they were obliged to abide by the terms of the Contract Labour (R&A) act, Minimum Wages Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, PF Act, Mines act.
4. The contractor engaged few casual workers to carry out certain jobs on temporary basis for a specified period. 2nd Party ensured Minimum Wages, PF contribution, safety applications etc., which they did. The dispute is raised after a lapse of 5 to 6 years. The workers having settled all their dues have now raised this dispute for bonus which is purely between them and the contractor.
5. To substantiate their contention 2nd Party placed on record, the evidence of its Assistant Manager (Personnel) along with the documents Work Order, Contractors Licence, the Renewal Licence, its Registration Certificate (Ex M-1 to Ex M-4). During the cross-examination the witness admits that 2nd Party did not verify whether the contractor paid the bonus for the workers for the period 2003 -2004.
6. The 1st party who all along prosecuted the case has opted not to adduce rebuttal evidence Ex M-1/the work order does not incorporate in itself such burden on the II Party to payment of bonus to the workman; it is not the statutory bonus of 8.33% which the 1st Party are claiming. Their claim is 20% in respect of the year 2003- 2004.The dispute is raised in the year 2009; they have no grievance in respect of any legal dues from the contractor; at this point of time where they have severed relationship by accepting their dues from their employer, there is no justification to pass on the burden on the Principle Employer for the payment of bonus. Security Amount / Bank guarantee which the employer will be holding against the contractor will not operate after cessation of their contractual relationship. In that view of the matter, there is no justification on behalf of the II Party No. 2 in denying bonus for the year 2003 – 2004. Hence,
AWARD
Reference is Rejected
(Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 673-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dqæseq[k vk;ju vksj dEiuh fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] csaxywj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 45@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@3@2007&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 673.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 45/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Bangalore now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of M/s Kudremukh Iorn Cmpany Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2743ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIUBNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT
DATED : 1st APRIL 2019
PRESENT : JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
C R No.45/2009
I Party
II Party
The General Manager, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited, Kudremukh, CHICKMAGALUR.
The General Secretary, Karnataka Coffee Curing & General Workers Union, AITUC Tamil Colony, CHICKMAGALUR.
Appearances
I Party : Shri Muralidhara, Advocate II Party : Smt. K Subha Ananthi, Advocate
AWARD
1. The Central Government vide order No. L-26011/3/2007-IR(M) dated 10.09.2009 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as "The Act") (14 of 1947) made this reference for adjudication with the following schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Kudremukh Iron Ore Co. Ltd. in not regularizing the services of 24 workers mentioned in the list enclosed is legal and correct? To what relief they are entitled to and from which date?"
2. The claim of the I Party Union is that the I Party Union represents the workman employed in the Coffee Curing establishments and other general service industries. The workman employed in various canteens run and maintained by II Party is its members. 2nd party is engaged in Mining and Processing Iron Ore and has legal obligation to run and maintain industrial canteen for the benefit of it's employees. It runs a canteen in Crush and Concentrator Department through a committee constituted for this purpose and subsidises the business day today affairs like deciding menu hygiene etc is handled by the canteen committee. It has given rent free accommodation, free electricity, water, gas and other items to run the canteen, furniture, utensils and other equipment is also provided; wages are paid directly by the II party to the employees of the canteen. The workman serving in the canteen are not paid wages as per standard wages. Their service is exploited. The administrative control appointment, promotions, disciplinary jurisdiction over the canteen is exercised by the II Party. All these years the workers had legitimate expectation that they will be absorbed in the service of the company, the II party when requested did not accept to regularise their service. Hence, the claim for direction to the II party to absorb them in the service of the II Party w.e.f. the date of joining the service etc. 3. The claim is countered by 2nd Party. It is stated that the 1st Party union is an outsider, not recognized by the 2nd Party and it has no locus standi to raise the dispute. All the I Party employees are the employees of the contractor H S Hiryanna and the 2ndParty is the Principal Employer. The contract with H S Hiryanna will end by 31.07.2010. The contractor has been awarded contract by following the due procedure. The contractor is a necessary party to this dispute. Hiriyanna is a licenced contractor. His contract is extended from 01.02.20019 for another 11 months. The Senior Manager (P L E) has issued a letter dated 14.07.2008 that contract will end by 30.06.2010 and he has to return the properties of the company. There are no sanctioned posts as far as Crush and Concentrator Department is concerned. There is no question of regularisation of the erst while contract employees. They do not intend to continue the contract of any contractor w.e.f. 01.08.2010.Now the mining is closed as per the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court. Strength of employees is decreased from 2200 to 415, they do not require additional canteen.
4. It is further stated, that the canteen workers are engaged by the contractor not by the II Party. The contract was awarded based on the tender process. Wages to the workers is paid by contractor. Management of the II party has no control over the canteen workers regarding engagement, supervision and control. A canteen management committee consisting of management representative and workers representative oversees functioning of the area, quality of food, cleanliness and hygine, etc., rent free accommodation and other facilities are provided as per the terms of the contract, for the welfare of the employees. There is no Master and Servant relationship between the II Party and the workers. The management ensures payment of minimum wages, PF Recovery and workman compensation by the contractor. The claim is not justified.
5. On completion of the pleadings to discharge the burden of proving the issue the management examined two witnesses and rebuttal evidence is not adduced. Both have submitted their arguments.
6. The first witness examined by the II Party was the Senior Manager (Personal) / MW1 the second witness was the Deputy Manager (HR) / MW 2. MW 1 produced the documents Ex M-1 to Ex M-8 pertaining to the contract awarded to Hiriyanna and extension of tenure of vide letter dated 14.07.2010/Ex M-8 of the Senior Manager. Hiriyanna is informed about the closure of period of contract on 13.07.2018 with a direction to handover the properties belonging2744 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] to the company. During his cross-examination the 1stParty confronted certain documents which the witness admitted. They are the Annual Subscription to the provident fund scheme pertaining to three workers in the name of the II Party (Ex W-1), One PF Slip pertains to H S Hiryanna (Ex W-1(a)); wage registers with the name of H S Hiriyanna as one of the worker (Ex W-2); three wage slips under the name of the establishment H S Hiryanna (Ex W-4).
7. MW 2 brought on record that the closure procedure is on and the possession of the mines has to be handed over to the officer designated by the ministry. Many of the regular employees were transferred to other places and others have opted for VRS. For the benefit of continuing employees canteen facility is continued. He produced the Original Work Order issued to the contractor during February 2009 and also subsequent extension of contract, the licence obtained by the contractor under Contract Labour Regulation & Abolition Act is also produced. During his further course of examination in chief he placed on record the mining operation is stopped w.e.f. 01.01.2006 vide orders of the apex court dated 30.10.2002 in I A 670/2001 in WP(C) No. 202/1995 and dated 12.05.2006 in I A 1150/2003, IA no. 1010/2003 in WP (C) No. 202/1995 the mine is taken over by Sh. B Ram Mohan, Regional Controller of Mines, Indian Bureau of Mines, Ministry of Mines, on 03.04.2014. Kudremukh Mining and Beneficiation Equipments are sold to Annam Steels Private Limited as per sale contract dated 12.12.2012 and they are dismantling the equipment's, the supporting documents are Ex M-13 and Ex M-14.
8. During the cross-examination it was brought forth that now the earlier casual workers are employed to work in the canteen on contract basis. It was also suggested because of the management concerned 24 workmen were not listed in the voters list by the Union, which the witness denied. 9. Despite the strong case set up by the 2nd Party that 1stParty are employed under H S Hiriyanna who is a licenced contractor, 1st Party have opted not to adduced rebuttal evidence. 10. Thus an opportunity to canvass before this tribunal about their case to the effect that it was a sham and bogus contract and they are really the workman of the II Party is lost for them. As such H S Hiriyanna subsequently raised a dispute challenging his termination which is adjudicated today (in C R No. 06/2014). Whatever observation made in the said case applies to the present case also. The Points of reference presupposes that the 1stParty 24 workers are the workmen of the 2ndParty.When it is shown by the 2nd Party that Hiriyanna had employed 17 workers, the 1st Party failed to demonstrate that the dispute is espoused on behalf of 24 workers working at Crush and Concentrator Department.Now, the law is very much settled that when a recognized union or inside union is not co-operating with the workman having dispute with its employer, there is no illegality on the part of outside union espousing the dispute. The question is only with regard to the identity of the canteen workers. The documents marked through the management witness are insufficient to hold that they were working directly under the control and supervision of the II Party management. MW 2 has clarified that the II Party used to disburse the wages to the workmen on behalf of the contractor. If their service is terminated without following the mandatory procedure by Section 25(F) of the Act, the proper party to answer the claim is H S Hiriyanna who held the licence for catering in the 2nd Party but he figures in the list of the 1st Party workmen. The facilities provided to the canteen is a welfare measure for the benefit of the employees of the II Party. It is nowhere shown that these workmen worked against any sanctioned post. On the top of it the mining operation itself has closed and the work force has migrated. In the light of the above, the tribunal does not find any irregularity in not regularising the service of 24 workers who worked in the canteen. Hence,
AWARD
Reference is Rejected (Dictated to U D C, transcribed by him, corrected and signed by me on 1st April 2019)
JUSTICE SMT. RATHNAKALA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 674-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ;wukbVsM bf.M;k b';ksjsa'k dEiuh fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] ,ukZdqye ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 12@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&17012@146@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 674.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to management of M/s United India Insurance Company Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18.4.2019.
[No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2745ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present: Shri V. Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer.
(Thursday the 2nd day of April, 2019)
ID No.12/2015
Workman : Shri.Vijayan Pillai.P.,
Sikha Bhavanam,
Panayam, Kollam.
By Adv. B.Mohanlal
Management : 1) The General Manager,
United India Insurance Company Ltd., Head Office, Chennai.
2) The Deputy General Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Regional Office, Kochi.
By Adv. T.J.Lakshmanan and M/s. B.S.Krishnan Associates This case coming up for hearing on 02.04.2019, this Tribunal cum Labour Court passed the following on the same day.
AWARD
In exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of subsection (1) subsection (2A) of Section 10 of Industrial Dispute Act 1947 the Central Government/Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-17012/146/2014-IR(M) dated 19.02.2015 referred the following industrial dispute for adjudication.
2. The dispute is
"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. United India Insurance Company limited is denying
the pay arrears and statutory benefits of Shri.Vijayan Pillai, Ex-caretaker of the Training Institute of the
Company on his termination is correct? If not, then what relief workman is entitled to?"
3. While the pleadings were being finalized, the Management raised a preliminary issue regarding the maintainability of the dispute and reference. According to the Management the only issue to be answered is whether there is denial of pay arrears or statutory benefits to the workman on his termination and if so what is the relief that he is entitled to. Legality or justifiability of the termination is not a question referred for adjudication. S.2A was introduced as per Industrial Dispute Amendment Act, 1965. Tracing the legislative history, it was pointed out by the learned Counsel for the Management that S.2A was incorporated into Industrial Dispute Act to enable individual workman to challenge dismissal and discharge without being sponsored by the Union or a number of workmen. Hence it is mandatory that legality or justifiability of termination is part of the reference and dispute, when an individual workman invokes S.2A(I) for adjudication of his claim.
4. The Counsel for the workman submitted that he challenged the legality of termination also before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C), however the reference is silent on same. Hence he again moved the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) for modification of the reference and to include the challenge of illegality of his termination. His application was disposed of by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) holding that the dispute raised by the workman is pending before this court. Further the Counsel for the workman submitted that inspite of the above How, this dispute can be entertained by this Court under section 2(A)(2) of Industrial Dispute Act. He further submitted that there are authorities to support his argument. But he failed to produce any authority inspite of the fact that adequate time was given for production of the same.
5. The specific issue to be decided is,
"Whether a reference under S.2(A)(I) read with S.10(I)(d) of Industrial dispute Act. 1947 is maintainable when the eligibility or justifiability of termination is not referred for adjudication."
6. As per S.2(A)(I) of the Act, when an employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminates the services of an individual workman any dispute or difference between that workman and his employee connected with or arising out of such termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute. From the language of the section it is clear that only disputes relating to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of individual workman will fall within the purview of the Section. Any dispute connected with or arising out of such termination implies that the legality or justifiability of the termination itself shall be under challenge.
2746 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]7. The Counsel for the workman strongly argued that this court can decide the dispute invoking section 2(A)(2) of the ID Act. As per Section 2(A)(2), a workman specified in section 2(A)(I) can move the Labour court or Tribunal for the adjudication of the dispute. There is no provision under the Act to convert a reference under Section 10 read with Section 2(A)(1) to an application under 2(A)(2). Further an application under S.2(A)(2) shall be filed within three years of termination.
8. The learned counsel for the Management/Petitioner also pointed out that in view of the mandate under Section10(4) of the Industrial Dispute Act when the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for adjudication, this court shall confine its adjudication to those points.
In view of the above, the preliminary issue regarding maintainability of the dispute is answered in favour of the Management.
9. The first relief claimed in the claim statement by the workman is to declare the dismissal of the workman without any reason, illegal and unjust. As already pointed out, this claim of the workman is not maintainable as it is not part of the reference at all. It is seen from the records of the proceedings that the workman moved the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) on 05.07.2016 for amending the reference.
Because of the pendency of this Industrial Dispute, the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) refused to entertain the amendment application. In view of the finding in the preliminary issue, nothing remains in this reference for adjudication.
For the reasons stated above an award is passed dismissing the claim of the workman as not maintainable.
The award will come into force one month after publication in the official gazette. Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed and typed by him, corrected and passed by me on this the 2nd day of April, 2019.
V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 675-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ;wukbVsM ÝsV dSfj;j izkbosV fyfeVsM ,oa vU; izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 23@2016½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26012@1@2016&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 675.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 23/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in the relation to the management of M/s United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 18.4.2019.
[No. L-26012/1/2016-IR(M)] D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 23/2016
Between:
Sri Mulakapalli Raju, S/o Late Chinna Rao, D.No.26-1-16/9, S.C. Colony, Chinagantyada, Gajuwada, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
…Petitioner[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2747
AND
1. M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited, D.no.7-4-32, Chettivanipalem, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam – 530026.
2. M/s. Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co., 'Kalyani', 9/2, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam (A.P.) – 530 017. …Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Sri Paila Srinivasa Rao, Advocate For the Respondents : Sri A.S. Rama Sarma, Advocate for R2
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 26012/1/2016-IR(M) dated 15.2.2016/ 17.2.2016 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Limited and their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of management of M/s. United Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam and Sri Krishna Engineering & Construction Co. Visakhapatnam (Contrator of RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant) in termination of Shri Mulkapalli Raju, Ex-contract worker in violation of Section 25(F) of Industrial Disputes Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief he is entitled?"
On receipt of the reference it is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 23/2016 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner Union.
3. Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner Workman to attend the court to prosecute the case. But the Petitioner workman failed to attend this Tribunal which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner workman has already been settled and the Petitioner has got nothing to raise any claim against the Respondents. Hence, the case of the Petitioner workman is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Witnesses examined for the Respondent
NIL
NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 676-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ts;wMh lhesUV fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 89@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&29011@13@2015&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo2748 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 676.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 89/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s JUD Cements Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. L-29011/13/2015-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 89 of 2015
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of CMD, JUD Cements Limited
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the Management : None On behalf of the Workmen : None Dated: 12th April, 2019. Industry: Cement
AWARD
By Order No.L-29011/13/2015-IR(M) dated 28.10.2015 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of JUD Cements Ltd. by not paying full & final payment to its
employee Shri Sudhansu Gantayet, Ex-Vice President (operation) is legal and/or justified? If not, what relief
workman is entitled to?"
2. When the case is taken up for hearing on 02.04.2019, none appeared for the parties concerned. In fact the parties never appeared before this Tribunal. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since 30.11.2015 and inspite of all the opportunities, neither the workman concerned has filed his statement of claim, nor the management has filed its written statement to proceed further with the case.
4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the workman has no grievance at present in respect of his full and final payment as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 12th April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 677-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ dsUnzh; Hk.Mkj.k fuxe ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 58@2014½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42011@1@2014&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 677.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 58/2014) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s Central Warehousing Corporation and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-42011/1/2014-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2749ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 58 of 2014
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of the Regional Manager, Central Warehousing Corporation AND
Their workmen.
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance :
On behalf of the Management : None
On behalf of the Workmen : None Dated: 22nd April, 2019. Industry : Warehousing
AWARD
By Order No.L-42011/1/2014-IR(M) dated 04.07.2014 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the management of Central Warehousing Corporation in not relieving all workmen I
the transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 & arbitrarily choosing the workmen to be relieved in unfair manner is
legal and/or justified? If not, to what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?"
2. In this reference case both the union and the management previously entered appearance through their respective learned counsel. Union filed its statement of claim praying for implementing transfer orders dated 28.08.2013 and 05.10.2013 issued by the Assistant Manager (Amin). Management filed its written statement denying the claim of the union. Union also filed its rejoinder to counter the statement of the management. Photo copies of some documents have also been filed by the union to support its case. But the union, as it transpires from record, remained absent since 04.07.2018. Inspite of sufficient opportunity the union has not led any evidence to substantiate its case. It also transpires from record that the union refused to receive the notice dated 12.06.2018 issued by this Tribunal.
3. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at present in respect of not relieving the workmen as per transfer list dated 28.8.13 & 5.10.13 as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
Justice RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata,
The 22nd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 678-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ vks-,u-th-lh- fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 7@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-4-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- tsM&16025@4@2019&vkbZvkj¼,e½]
Mh- ds- fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 678.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 7/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ahmedabad now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s O.N.G.C. Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 23.4.2019.
[No. Z-16025/4/2019-IR(M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
2750 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present :
Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad,
Dated 04th April, 2019
Complaint (CGITA) No. 07/2004
(Old Complaint (ITC) No. 8/2010)
Senva Ambalal, Village Kathwada, Tal. Matar, Navgam, Kheda (Gujarat) C/o Gujarat Petroleum Employees Union, 434-46, Gandhivas, Koba Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Complainant
V/s
1. M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd.,
Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana (Gujarat)
2. M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd.,
19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
3. The G.G.M. (P),
ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
4. The General Manager (OBG),
ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)
…Respondents
For the Complainant : Sh. Arish L. Saiyed
For the Opponent No.1 : Absent
For the Opponent No.2 : Absent
For the Opponent No. 3 & 4 : Shri K.V. Gadhia & Shri M.K. Patel
ORDER
1. This is a complaint Ex. 1 moved under Section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act by the complainant Senva Ambalal on 17.02.2000 in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 alleging that the complainant has been working with the opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana under sham arrangement of contract on the establishment of opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad and opposite party no. 4 The General Manager, ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad, so called real employer. The opposite party no. 1 was later changed by the opposite party no. 2 M/s Parishram Labour Co-operative Society Ltd., 19, Sahjanand Shopping Centre, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad. He has further alleged that he has also been a workman in Reference (ITC) No. 35/1998 shown at serial no. 48 in the list attached with the reference. He has been working at the establishment of ONGC at GGS II (OEG) since 08.01.1987 without any break with full satisfaction of the supervisors. He worked during January 1999, February 1999 and March 1999, thereafter for 4 days in April 1999 but he was not paid the wages for the said period despite making written representation to ONGC. He has further alleged that he has been working since 1987 but his services were terminated orally without paying any notice and notice pay. Therefore, he has prayed for reinstatement with full back wages and the unpaid as stated above.
2. All the parties were issued notice but only the opposite party no. 3 The G.G.M. (P), ONGC, Avni Bhavan, 5th Floor, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad submitted the written statement Ex. 4 submitting that there was no master servant relationship with the workman and ONGC and after enquiry, no such workman was found on the muster roll of ONGC. He never made any representation to the ONGC for pending of wages; therefore, the complaint is liable to be rejected.
3. Earlier the complainant has deposed vide Ex. 5 and reiterated the facts stated in the complaint, thereafter the complaint was proceeded ex-parte and the then Presiding Officer, Shri B.I. Kazi passed the order ex-parte and allowed the complaint with 60% back wages.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27514. Against the said ex-parte award, the opposite party ONGC has filed Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 for restoration of Complainant (CGITA) No. 07/2004 and said Misc. Application (CGITA) No. 01/2007 was allowed by the State Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 14.09.2010.
5. After the restoration of the complaint, the complainant Ambalal K. Senva has expired on 14.10.2009 and legal heirs of the complainant Paresh Ambalal Senva moved an application Ex. 23 which was allowed on 26.07.2017 and legal heirs were substituted accordingly in place of deceased complainant.
6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
i. Whether the deceased complainant Ambalal Sanva was a contract employee and the contract was sham and bogus?
ii. Whether the complainant was the employee of ONGC?
iii. To what relief, if any, the legal heir of the deceased complainant is entitled?
7. Issue No. i, ii and iii: As all the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The legal heirs of the complainant filed an affidavit 24 reiterating the averments made in the complaint. In his cross-examination, he has stated that besides him, his mother and sisters are the legal heirs of his deceased father. He is working as a security guard in a company through contractor who is also a contractor of ONGC. He has stated that his deceased father was also a contract labour. He does not know as to whether ONGC has given any appointment letter to his father or not. He has further stated that the contractor paid the wages to his father. He does not have any proof to show that his father was served with the contractor for more than 240 days in any calendar year. His father was received wages for the days he used to work. His father has maintained the whole family till his death.
8. From the pleadings of the parties and oral evidence available on record, it is established that the deceased complainant was the employee of contractor M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd. ONGC has no master and servant relationship with the deceased complainant, therefore, ONGC bears no liability regarding the deceased complainant. Considering the above stated facts and settled legal position by the apex court that even in non-compliance of Section 25 F with the daily wager, proper relief to be granted is compensation and not reinstatement as held by the apex court in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited V/s Mansingh, 2012 (1) SCC 558. Since the complainant was expired on 14.10.2009 i.e. during the pendency of the complaint, hence even on this point, the complainant is not entitled to get reinstated. As held by the apex court in various pronouncements, the legal heirs of the complainant are entitled to get lump-sum compensation. Thus it would be appropriate to award a lump-sum compensation of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant in lieu of back wages and all other employment dues. No relief can be granted against ONGC. All the issues are decided accordingly.
9. The opposite party no. 1 M/s Public Power Mazdoor Kamdar Sahakari Mandli Ltd., Opp. Dhoot Sagar Dairy, Highway Road, Mehsana is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the legal heirs of the deceased complainant within 60 days from the publication of this order.
10. The order is passed accordingly.
P. K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 679-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 127@2005½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@30@2005&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 679.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 127/2005) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12012/30/2005-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
2752 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/127/2005
General Secretary, Nationalised Bank Karmchari Sangathan, 9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain.
…Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager (O), State Bank of Indore, Head Office, Indore (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 28th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 11-11-2005 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/30/2005-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of
Head Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as
"off duty" after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri
Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified? If not, what relief he is entitled?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman has stated that he was first appointed as clerk cum cashier with the Vidisha branch of the Bank on 8-6-77. During the course of service, he was transferred at Nateran branch and was posted as Head cashier in the year 1982. He was issued a charge sheet by the department on the basis of information, given by the Branch Manager of the Bank on 16-3-1985. This charge sheet was further amended and an amended charge sheet dated 9-4-85 was issued, he filed a written reply of the charge sheet. Mr. J.C.Mahajan was appointed as Enquiry Officer who conducted enquiry without allowing the workman to bring his representative. The Presenting Officer persuaded the workman to admit the charges and it is on his persuasion, he admitted the charges. The Enquiry Officer filed an Enquiry Report dated 12-6-85 holding the workman guilty. The finding was against fact and evidence because there was no witness to examine during the enquiry to prove the charges. The appointing authority passed order of dismissal on the basis of Enquiry Report without giving any opportunity of personal hearing on the proposed sentence. The workman filed an appeal before the departmental Appellate Authority who set aside the termination and passed the impugned punishment regarding stoppage of Head cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as of treating suspension period as "off duty" which is against law and against bipartite settlement above mentioned. Accordingly. the workman prayed for setting aside of impugned punishment and back wages accordingly.
3. The employer Bank, in their Written statement of defense just raised the preliminary objection that since the workman has now been promoted as Manager and posted in Vidisha Branch, he cannot be treated as a workman as defined under Section 2(s) of ID Act, 1947, hence the reference is not maintainable before the Tribunal. It was also pleaded that during the period workman was posted in Nateran branch, complaints of grave misconduct and misbehavior were received against him. He was suspended on 24-1-1985 and chargesheet dated 16-3-1985 , which was amended and amended chargesheet dated 9th April 1985 were served on him. The charges were that on 29th September 1984, workman refused to open the cash safe of the branch adversely affecting the working of Bank, on that date, he did not furnish his cash scroll to the Manager and other 3 charges regarding misappropriation of money and in subordination, mentioned in the para-9 of Written Statement asunder-
1. The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;
2. On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;
3. On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;
4. On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984 whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 27535. The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).
4. It was further pleaded that the workman filed a written explanation for the charges vide his letter dated 27-3- 1985 which were not satisfactory and a regular DE was instituted. The workman unconditionally admitted all the charges without any fear or coercion. He refused to cross-examine any witness, he also refused to adduce any evidence in his defense and on the basis of his plead, held guilty. The Enquiry Officer filed his report dated 12-6-1985 holding the charges proved against the workman. After receiving the Enquiry Report, workman was issued show cause notice on the point of proposed sentence of dismissal on 12-6-1985. He filed written reply of the notice on 4-7-85. After considering the material, a sentence regarding dismissal was passed by Appointing Authority on 7-7-85. Workman preferred a departmental appeal which was disposed vide order dated 4-7-86 setting aside the dismissal and passing the impugned punishment as mentioned. It was further pleaded that the Departmental Enquiry was conducted legally and properly and sentence imposed is not shockingly dis- appropriate to the charges proved.
5. On the basis of respective pleadings, preliminary issue/ point for determination regarding fairness and legality of departmental enquiry was framed by his learned predecessor. Preliminary issue was decided by my learned predecessor vide order dated 25-4-2017 whereby he held the Departmental Enquiry proper and legal. This order shall be part of this award. Following other issues were framed:-
(2) Whether the charges alleged against workman are proved from evidence in Enquiry Proceedings?
(3) Whether the punishment of stoppage of Head Cashier Allowance and two annual increments and compulsory retirement imposed against workman is legal and proper?
(4) If so, to what relief the workman is entitled to?
6. It is further to mention here that no further evidence was adduced on the point of 3 issues as mentioned which were framed later on after deciding preliminary issue. Mr. R. Nagwanshi, representative of the Union preferred to file written argument which is on record. Learned counsel for management has also filed written argument. I have gone through the respective written argument and also the record.
7. Point for determination No.2 & 3
In his written statement of claim, workman has himself admitted that he admitted the guilt during the course of Departmental Enquiry. His case is that he did so on the promise that he will not be terminated from service. The burden is on the workman to prove this fact of the alleged assurance before the Enquiry Officer to prove his case that his admission of guilt was not unconditional rather it was after a promise given by the Bank/ Enquiry Officer. He could do so before the Appellate Authority. The records of enquiry have been proved in evidence during the hearing of preliminary issue No.1. The written admission given by the workman before the Enquiry Officer is on record which does not show that it was given involuntarily hence on the basis of admission of charges which is not disputed at any stage, it is held that charges against the workman were proved during the domestic enquiry.
I am supported by a decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Central Bank of India vs Karumamoy reported in AIR-1986-80-266 wherein it has been held that if the workman admits his guilt, then to insist upon the management to let an evidence about the allegations will be an empty formality.
8. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that charges against workman were proved during the domestic enquiry on the basis of his admission of guilt. The charges proved against workman are as under:-
1. The applicant on 29-9-84 refused to open the cash safe, therefore the Branch Manager had to bring Rs.3000 from the Cooperative Bank so as to run the business of the Bank;
2. On 29-9-1984, the applicant did not handover his cash scroll to the Manager, therefore, a new scroll was to be opened so as to discharge the daily work;
3. On 8-12-1984, the applicant did not make payment of Rs.30/- against withdrawal made by Bank employee Shri Chandrakant Changad despite it was passed by Branch Manager;
4. On examining the case of dated 10-12-1984, difference of Rs.30/- was found in the cash memo and cash so collected and payment of Rs.30/- was found to have been made on 10-12-1984 whereas it was passed for 8-12-1984;
5. The applicant doesnot comply with the office orders issued by the Branch Manager form time to time and refuses to put signatures on the registers of such orders(e.g he refused to put signatures for the orders dated 28-9-84 and 8-12-84).
9. These charges relate to the dereliction of duty insubordination hence are in the category of grave misconduct warranting major punishment. The appellate authority has taken a lenient view in setting aside the termination2754 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] passed by the Appointing Authority and converting it into stoppage of Head Cashier allowance and 2 annual increments as well as treating suspension period as "off duty". Hence in no parameter, the charges can be held shockingly disproportionate to the charges. Point No.2 is answered accordingly.
10. Point for determination No.4-
On the basis of above discussion, the applicant is not entitled to any relief.
11. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of State Bank of Indore in imposing the penalty of stoppage of Head
Cashier allowance and stoppage of 2 annual increments as well as treating the suspension period as
"off duty" after reducing the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement from service on Shri
Jagdish Prasad Gautam is legal and justified.
(2) The workman Shri Jagdish Prasad Gautam is not entitled to any relief.
12. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.
Dated:28-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 680-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 66@2009½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12011@70@2008&vkbZvkj¼ch- 1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 680.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 66/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of India and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12011/70/2008-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/66/2009
General Secretary,
Dainik Vetan Bhogi Bank Karmchari Sangathan,
F-1, Tripti Vihar, Opp. Engg. College,
Ujjain.
…Workman/Union
Versus
Chief General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Regional Head Office,
Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal. …Management
AWARD
Passed on this 27th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 1-7-2009 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12011/70/2008-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is entitled for payment of difference of
wages as per Bipartite Settlement? If yes, what relief he is entitled to?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, he has claimed his dues from 1-9-95 to 1-4-02 as arrears with an allegation that he had been[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2755 working since 1-9-95 as a daily wager with the MG Road, Indore branch of the bank. He was disengaged by the employers on 1-4-2002. He raised a dispute with the Central Government and reference was made which was registered as R/132/95 and award was passed on 25-4-2014. He further stated that his wages were paid by the Bank from the profit and loss account. He is entitled to pay, details given in Para-9 & 11 of the petition. In the light of Desai Award and Ist Bipartite Agreement dated 19-10-66 which was not paid to him though he was entitled to get it. Accordingly he has sought relief regarding the payment of his arrears as mentioned above.
3. Management filed its Written Statement of defense wherein they denied that workman was engaged at any point of time with the Bank. It was further pleaded by the employers that the workman was simply engaged for 1-2 hours in a day that too purely on casual basis. He was not employed by the Bank. His engaged was against rules. He was disengaged later on. He raised dispute on the basis of which reference was made by appropriate Government to this court which was registered as CGIT/LC/R/132/05 and was answered in negative. Accordingly, he is not entitled to get regular pay scale/ difference of wages as claimed by him which is only for permanent employees.
4. Both the sides have examined on oath themselves. Workman has examined himself on oath whereas management has examined Hariom Gupta, Chief Manager on oath who have stated and supported their respective claims as mentioned above. Copy of the award dated passed in the reference case R/132/2005 is also on record. At the time of argument, none appeared from the side of Bank.
5. Mr. Ram Nagwanshi appeared as Union Representative on behalf of workman. He submitted oral argument and also filed memorandum of argument I have gone through the written argument and also gone through the records.
6. The main argument on behalf of workman is that when it is proved that he has worked with the employer Bank, he was entitled to difference of salary in the light of bipartite agreement and award as mentioned by him, details given in his statement of claim whereas the argument of the Bank is that this agreement and award applies only to regular/ permanent employees of the Bank and not to the casual labors. Hence the point for determination which arise is as under:-
"Whether it is proved that the workman has been in engagement, may be as daily wager on regular basis
or not."
Award (Copy) in the connected reference case is on record. Perusal of which reveals that the claim of workman that he worked continuously for 240 days in the preceding 12 months of his date of disengagement was not proved and accordingly his disengagement was not held violative of Section 25 B of I.D.Act. It was also held that the employers were not bound to comply the provisions of Section 25-F before his disengagement in his case and his disengagement was found legal and proper. There is nothing on record to show that this finding by the Tribunal has been overturned by any superior Court hence when it is not proved that workman has been in a regular engagement may be as a daily wager, he cannot be held entitled to any difference of pay as claimed by him under the award and bipartite agreement.
7. On the basis of above discussion, it is held that the workman Kamal Damodare is not entitled to difference of wages as per bipartite settlement.
8. In the result, award is passed as under:-
"The workman Shri Kamal Damodare S/o Shri Motiram Damodare is not entitled for payment of
difference of wages as per Bipartite Settlement."
9. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labor & Employment as per rules.
Dated : 27-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 26 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 681-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj LVsV cSad bankSj ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k tcyiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 165@2002½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@162@2002&vkbZvkj¼ch&1½]
ch- ,l- fc"V] voj lfpo2756 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 26th April, 2019
S.O. 681.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 165/2002) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of State Bank of Indore and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 26.4.2019.
[No. L-12012/162/2002-IR(B-1)]
B. S. BISHT, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/165/2002
General Secretary,
Rashtriya Bank Karmchari Sangthan,
9, Sanwer Road, Ujjain (MP) …Workman/Union
Versus
General Manager (Operations),
State Bank of Indore,
Head Office, 5, Yeshwant Niwas Road,
Indore (MP)
…Management
AWARD
Passed on this 25th day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 7-11-2002 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 12012/162/2002-IR(B-I). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in
stopping 4 annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified?
If not, what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim. In his statement of claim, workman has alleged that he was first appointed on 29th August 1981 in Paitlavat branch of State Bank of Indore as a peon. During course of his employment, he was promoted as Daftary in the year 1989. In the year 1994, when he was posted in Rajgarh branch of the Bank, he was called by the then employer and was given charge of Head cashier and he worked as Head cashier, doing clerical work since 1997. It was further alleged that the Manager instructed him to issue certificate to one Suraj Pawar, on the fact that Suraj Pawar has been working since last 3 years with the Bank as a daily wager employee which he issued under the instruction of the Branch Manager. Also it was alleged that a charge sheet was issued to him with reference to this certificate and enquiry was conducted against him which was against principles of natural justice, without giving him a fair chance to put his defense and he was held guilty for the charge of issuing unauthorizedly a false certificate. It is also his case that before awarding impugned punishment, no opportunity was given to him on the point of sentence. He raised the dispute with the Government, accordingly he has claimed that the punishment being excessive be set-aside.
3. The employer bank has pleaded in his Written Statement of defense that when the applicant was posted as Daftary at Rajgarh branch, he committed certain omissions and commissions and misconduct under Ist Bipartite Settlement. He was served charge sheet alleging charges and was directed to submit a reply. He submitted a reply which was not satisfactory. Therefore a domestic enquiry was held. Mr. A.K.Joshi an officer of the Bank was deputed as Enquiry Officer and S.N.Harbude was made Presenting Officer. During the enquiry, the workman admitted the charges in writing and in view of his admission/ plead guilty, the charges were held proved by the Enquiry Officer and thereafter impugned punishment with regard to stoppage of 4 increments with cumulative effect w.e.f. 1991 was passed. Also it was pleaded that the workman did not prefer any appeal or representation and accepted the punishment and also that the enquiry was conducted properly keeping in view the principles of natural justice in mind and the punishment is not excessive.
4. On the basis of pleadings, following issues/ points for determination were framed by my learned predecessor:-
(1) Whether the domestic enquiry conducted against workman is proper and legal?
This issue was decided as preliminary issue vide order dated 16-9-2014. This order is also a part of this award. The domestic enquiry was held legal and properly conducted. Thereafter following other issues/ points for determination was framed by my learned predecessor-[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2757
(2) Whether charges against workman are proved?
(3) Whether punishment of with-holding 4 increments of workman is legal?
(4) What relief the workman is entitled?
5. No further evidence was adduced by any of the parties on these issues. I have heard argument of Mr.Ram Nagwanshi. None present from the side of management. no written argument were filed by management. I have gone through the record.
6. Point for determination No.2-
7. There is on record, written admission of charge filed by the workman during the enquiry. In his statement of claim also, workman has stated that he issued a certificate but on the instructions of the Manager. Hence, he does not deny the issue of certificate for which he was not authorized. His claim that this certificate was issued on instruction of Manager requires proof. The enquiry report itself states that no evidence was given by the workman during enquiry nor did he cross-examined any of the witnesses. Hence on the basis of his admission alone, the Enquiry Officer was fully justified in law and fact holding the charges against the workman proved. On the basis of above discussion, the charges levelled against workman during the domestic enquiry are held proved on the basis of his admission. Issue No.2 is answered accordingly.
8. Point for determination No.3-
9. The charge proved against workman is that he exceeded his jurisdiction and issued certificate which he was not authorized and the punishment given for the charge is stoppage of 4 increments with retrospective effect. There is nothing on record to show that this punishment is excessive. Particularly in the light of fact that there had been complaints of wrong omissions and commissions and misconduct against the workman and also that he did not improve even after the punishment and was compulsorily retired when he was found guilty for other charges of misconduct. Hence it is held that the punishment imposed is not shockingly disproportionate so as to warrant interference by this Tribunal. It should be kept in mind that this Tribunal is not an Appellate Authority regarding the disciplinary proceedings.
10. Point for determinationNo.4-
11. On the basis of above discussion, applicant is not entitled to relief claimed by him.
12. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of General Manager (Operation), State Bank of Indore in stopping 4
annual increments with retrospective e effect in r/o Shri Narendra Shah, Daftari is justified.
(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.
13. Let the copies of the award be sent to the Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment as per rules.
Dated:25-3-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 682-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 150@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@140@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 682.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 150 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer2758 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference : No. 150/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Katrash Area of M/S BCCL,
AND
Their workman
Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers:- Shri Rahul Kumar Mondal Dy. Manager
For the workman. :- Shri K.D.P.Yadav, President (NCWC)
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 26/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/140/1999-IR(C-I) dated 15/07/1999 the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of BCCL in recording the age of 50 years as on 21.07.88 of Sri
Mahendra Singh, Pump Operator when his date of birth is 01.01.1949 in his service record is proper and
justified? If not, what direction is required in this respect and to what relief is the concerned workman
entitled?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and during the hearing of the case, Ld. President of Sponsoring Union has informed that workman has not been interested in contesting the case. It is felt that the workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No dispute" award is passed. communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 683-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 151@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@587@1998&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 683.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 151 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-1)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference : No. 150/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Bastacolla Area of M/s BCCL,
AND
Their workman
Present : Sri D.K. Singh, Presiding Officer.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2759Appearances:
For the Employers:- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated : 25/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/587/1998-IR(C-I) dated 06/07/1999 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Union to refer to Medical Board for determination of date of birth of Shri
Kapildeb Sharma, Night Guard under 1.1.76 (JBCCI) is justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is
entitled and from what date?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. So, it appears that the workman has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No dispute" award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 684-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 204@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@394@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 684.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 204 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in srelation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 204/1999
Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand Industry- Coal Dated- 27/03/ 20192760 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/394/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Union from the management of Gopalichuk Colliery of M/S BCCL to
regularize Sri Ram Chet Beldar as an office clerk is proper and justified? If yes to what relief the
workman is entitled and from what date?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 685-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch- lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 206@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@371@1999&vkbZvkj¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 685.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 206 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 206/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- None
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 26/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/371/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2761SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Area No.III of M/S BCCL Dhanbad to deny
regularization of Sri Ram Karan Mistry Block IV as lamp issue clerk is just and proper ? If not to what
relief the workman is entitled?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019 dk-vk- 686-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch- lh-lh-,y- izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 207@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@4@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@373@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh&1½]
,e- ds- Çlg] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 686.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 207 of 1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25.4.2019.
[No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 207/1999
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. BCCL
AND
Their workman.
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers :- Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate
For the workman. :- None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 25/03/2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/373/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of South Govindpur Colliery of Area No.III M/S BCCL
Dhanbad to deny regularization of Sri Jailal Mahato as underground munshi in clerical Gr.II with
protection of wages is just and proper? If not to what relief Shri Jailal Mahato is entitled?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer2762 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 687-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 208@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@333@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 687.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 208/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 208/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Barora.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal Dated- 28/03/2019 AWARD
By order No. L-20012/333/2001-IR(C-I) dated 21/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub–section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the National coal workers congress of BCCL, Barora Area-1 to promote/
regularize Sri Kashi Nath Gour as Exv. Gr.D in 01.01.92 to Gr.C in 01.01.97 and in Gr.B 01.01.2001
with payment of arrear salary is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief the workman is entitled ?
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Shri S.C.Gour who had received the notice on behalf of workman has informed that workman is not interested in contesting the case. Now the case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 688-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 205@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FksA
[la- ,y&20012@145@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2763
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 688.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 205/2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 205/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Jealgora Colliery of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Sing, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal
Dated-26/03/2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/145/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the Demand of Colliery Karmchari Sangh from the management of Jealgora Colliery of
M/S. BCCL that Sri Shiv Shankar Singh is to be promote in Techinical Grade 'C' in Asstt.
Foreman(Auto) is proper and justified? If yes, to what relief is entitled the claimant entitled and which
date?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but both parties failed to appear before this Tribunal. Notices were issued but even then none of the parties appeared. Case is pending since long. so, it appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 689-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&20012@11@2001&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 689.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 203 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer2764 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 4, 2019/VAISAKHA 14, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 203/2001
Employer in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Shri D.K.Verma, Advocate
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal
Dated- 25/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/11/2001-IR(C-I) dated 18/09/2001, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the RCMS from the management of BCCL North Tisra Colliery for
regularizing Sri Yamuna Tiwari in Techinical Grade "C" from 1991 is justified? If so to what relief is
the workman entitled and from what date?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Notice were issued but even then none appeared on behalf of the workman. More over one of the notices returned with endorsement " Not Known". The management remains present through lawyer. Case is pending since long. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence "No Dispute" Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K.SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 29 viSzy] 2019
dk-vk- 690-&vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼a1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjkas ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ"V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 203@1999½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 25@04@-2019 dks izkIr gq, FkkA
[la- ,y&20012@390@1999&vkbZvkj ¼lh-I½]
,e- ds- flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 690.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the award of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 1 Dhanbad (Ref. No. 203/1999) as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 25/04/2019.
[No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I)]
M. K. SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947.
Reference: No. 203/1999
Employer in relation to the management of P.B.Area of M/S.BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present : Shri D.K.Singh, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 4, 2019/वैशाख 14, 1941 2765
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry- Coal
Dated- 28/03/ 2019
AWARD
By order No. L-20012/390/1999-IR(C-I) dated 02/12/1999, the central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub –section (1) and sub-section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Union before the management of Gopalichuk Colliery under P.B.Area of
M/S BCCL to regularize S/Sri Raj Ballabh Paswan and Madan Kumar Sinha as Attendance clerk is
proper and justified ? If yes, to what relief the workman are entitled and from what date?"
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed. The workmen appeared for certain dates, but subsequently left appearing before this Tribunal. Case is pending since 13.12.1999. It appears that the workmen has lost his interest to resolve the matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.