रजिस्ट्री सं. डी. एल. ;एनद्ध 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
प्राध्किार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्राालयों ;रक्षा मंत्राालय को छोड़करद्ध द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविध्कि आदेश और अध्सिूचनाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
िव(cid:3)िव(cid:3)िव(cid:3)िव(cid:3) मं(cid:6)ालयमं(cid:6)ालयमं(cid:6)ालयमं(cid:6)ालय
((((वित्तीयवित्तीयवित्तीयवित्तीय सेवाएं िवभागसेवाएं िवभागसेवाएं िवभागसेवाएं िवभाग))))
नई (cid:4)द(cid:6)ली, 10 मई, 2019
काकाकाका. आ. . आ. . आ. . आ. 777752525252....————कें (cid:3)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 (1987 में यथा संशोिधत) के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में निम्नलिखित बैंको/वित्तीय संस्थाओं के सूचीब2 कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को अधिसूचित करती है, िजनके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक :ान प्राप्त कर लिया है:-
| <.सं. | बैंक / वित्तीय संस्थाओं का नाम | शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की संख्या |
| 1. | भारतीय बीमा विनियामक और विकास प्राधिकरण | 3 |
| 2. | न ेशनल इंश्योरेंस कं पनी लिमिटेड | 1 |
| 3. | इंडियन बैंक | 2 |
| 4. | भारतीय निर्यात-आयात बैंक | 2 |
2359 GI/2019
(2877)
2878 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]| . 5 | भारतीय लघु उधोग विकास बैंक | 2 |
| कु लकु लकु लकु ल | 10101010 |
[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हि.(अधि.)]
शैलेश कु मार सिह, संयुक्त निदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 (4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों की सूचीअधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों की सूचीअधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों की सूचीअधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों की सूची राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 (4) के अंतर्गत राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 (4) के अंतर्गत राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10 (4) के अंतर्गत
1. भारतीय बीमा िविनयामक और िवकास
प्राधिकरण
सवF नं.-115/1, फाइनंिशयल डिस्ट्रिक्ट
नानकरामगुडा, गIीबाउली,
हैदराबाद, तेलंगाना
िपन: 500032
2. भारतीय बीमा िविनयामक और िवकास
प्राधिकरण
दिल्ली कार्यालय - गेट नंबर 3
जीवन तारा बिल्डिग, पहली मंिजल
संसद मार्ग, नई दिल्ली
िपन : 110001
3. भारतीय बीमा िविनयामक और िवकास
प्राधिकरण
मु ंबई क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय
रॉयल इंश्योरेंस बिल्डिग (चर्चगेट के निकट)
12, जे टाटा रोड, िनचली मंिज़ल
मु ंबई , िपन : 400020
4. नेशनल इंश्योरेंस कं पनी लिमिटेड,
कोIी क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय,
प्रथम व द्वितीय तल,
ओमाना बिल्डिग, ज्यू स्ट्रीट,
पॅTा जंक्शन,
कोIी- 682035.
अंचल कार्यालय अंचल कार्यालय अंचल कार्यालय अंचल कार्यालय –––– नई दिल्लीनई दिल्लीनई दिल्लीनई दिल्ली
5. इंडियन बैंक
रानीबाग शाखा,
3422, महें(cid:3) पार्क ,
रानीबाग
नई दिल्ली – 110034
6. इंडियन बैंक
कं झावाला शाखा,
142 / 116, मेन घेवरा रोड,
कं झावाला,
दिल्ली – 110081
7. भारतीय निर्यात-आयात बैंक,
साकार II, पहली मंिजल, एलिसब्रिज,
शॉपिग सेंटर के पास, एलिसब्रिज,
पी.ओ., अVदाबाद-380006,
फोन: (079) 26576852
फै क्स: (079) 26577696
ई-मेल: [email protected]
8. भारतीय निर्यात-आयात बैंक,
गोल्डन एडिफिस, दूसरी मंिजल,
6-3-639/640, राजभवन रोड,
खैरताबाद सर्क ल,
हैदराबाद- 500004
फोन: (040) 23307816-21
फै क्स: (040) 23317843
ई-मेल: [email protected][भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2879 10. भारतीय लघु उधोग विकास बैंक, 9. भारतीय लघु उधोग विकास बैंक,
पहली मंिजल, ''निर्मल'',
1. डी, पहली मंिजल, सिटी स्टेशन रोड,
7,रामकृ ष्णनगर कार्नर,
उदीयापोल; विपरीत महाराष्ट्रा बैंक,
कमिbर बंगले के सामने,
उदयपुर – 313001,
राजस्थान
या:िक रोड,
राजकोट – 360001
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2019
S.O. 752.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987),the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of following Bank/Financial Institution, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:—
| erial No. | Name of the Bank/ Financial Institution | Number of Branches/Offices |
| 1. | Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India | 3 |
| 2. | National Insurance Company Limited | 1 |
| 3. | INDIAN BANK | 2 |
| 4. | Export –Import Bank Of India | 2 |
| 5. | Small Industries Development Bank Of India | 2 |
| Total | 10 |
[F. No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of Offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) of Official Language Rule 1976.
1. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
of India
Sy No. 115/1, Financial District, Nanakramguda,Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana Pin: 500032
4. National Insurance Company Limited Kochi Regional Office, 1st and 2nd Floor, Omana Building, Jew Street, Padma Junction, Kochi-682035
2. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
Zonal Office New Delhi
of India
5. INDIAN BANK
Delhi Office – Gate No. 3
RANIBAGH BRANCH
Jeevan Tara Building, First Floor
3422, MAHINDRA PARK
Sansad Marg, New Delhi
Pin: 110001
RANI BAGH
NEW DELHI - 110034
3. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
of India
6. INDIAN BANK
Mumbai Regional Office
KANJHAWALA BRANCH
Royal Insurance Building, (Near Churchgate)
142/116, MAIN GHEVRA ROAD
12, J. Tata Road, Ground Floor
KANJHAWALA
Mumbai
DELHI – 110081
Pin : 400 020.
2880 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]7. Export –Import Bank Of India, Sakar ll ,1st Floor, Next to Ellisbridge, Shopping Centre , Ellisbridge, P.O Ahmedabad-380006, Phone- (079) 26576852, Fax- (079) 26577696, E-Mail- [email protected]
8. Export –Import Bank Of India, Golden Edifice,2nd Floor, 6-3-639/640, Rajbhavan Road, Khairatabad Circle, Hyderabad-500004, Phone- (040) 23307816-21
Fax- (040) 23317843 E-Mail- [email protected]
9. Small Industries Development Bank Of India, First Floor, 'Nirmal' , 7, Ramkrishnanagar Corner, Opp. Commissioner Bunglow, Off Yagnik Road, Rajkot – 360001.
10. Small Industries Development Bank Of India, 1-D, First Floor, City Station Road , Udiapole, Opposite Bank Of Maharashtra, Udaipur – 313001, Rajasthan.
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. . . . 753753753753....————कें (cid:3)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के िलए प्रयोग) िनयम, 1976 (1987 में यथा
संशोिधत) के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण में सिडिके ट बैंक के सूचीब2 कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को अिधसूिचत करती
है, िजनके 80% से अिधक कर्मचारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक :ान प्राप्त कर िलया है : —
| <.सं. | बैंक का नाम | कार्यालयों / शाखाओं की संख्या |
| 1. | सिडिके ट बैंक | 126 |
| कु लकु लकु लकु ल | 126126126126 |
शैलेश कु मार सिह, संयुक्त िनदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाराजभाराजभाराजभाषाषाषाषा िनयमिनयमिनयमिनयम 1976 1976 1976 1976 केकेकेके िनयमिनयमिनयमिनयम 10(4) 10(4) 10(4) 10(4) केकेकेके अंतर्गतअंतर्गतअंतर्गतअंतर्गत भारतभारतभारतभारत सरकारसरकारसरकारसरकार केकेकेके राजपत्रराजपत्रराजपत्रराजपत्र मेंमेंमेंमें अिधसूिचतअिधसूिचतअिधसूिचतअिधसूिचत किएकिएकिएकिए जानेजानेजानेजाने वालेवालेवालेवाले कार्यालयकार्यालयकार्यालयकार्यालय////शाखाशाखाशाखाशाखा
काकाकाका नामनामनामनाम
1. सििडके ट बैंक
रोल्ला शाखारोल्ला शाखारोल्ला शाखारोल्ला शाखा 6-107, रeगिरि रोड, रोल्ला
िजला : अनंतपुरम
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 515 321
2. सिडिके ट बैंक
अदोनी शाखाअदोनी शाखाअदोनी शाखाअदोनी शाखा
पीएन रोड, अदोनी
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 518 301
3. सिडिके ट बैंक
बंगनपल्ली शाखाबंगनपल्ली शाखाबंगनपल्ली शाखाबंगनपल्ली शाखा
9-266, मेन रोड, बंगनपल्ली
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 518 124
4. सिडिके ट बैंक
मद्दिके रा शाखामद्दिके रा शाखामद्दिके रा शाखामद्दिके रा शाखा
डी सं. 4/131, मेन रोड, मद्दिकोरा
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 518 385
5. सिडिके ट बैंक
िसरवेल शाखािसरवेल शाखािसरवेल शाखािसरवेल शाखा
डी. सं. 439-1ए, hसैन नगर, सिरवेल
िजला : कनू र्ल[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2881 डोर सं. 8/8 ए,
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
बस स्टैंड के पास, ओरवकल
िपन : 518 563
िजला : कनू र्ल
6. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
येम्मिगनूर शाखायेम्मिगनूर शाखायेम्मिगनूर शाखायेम्मिगनूर शाखा 1/395, सोमप्पा सjकल, बस स्टैंड रोड
िपन : 518 010
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
12. सिडिके ट बैंक
पिगडाला शाखापिगडाला शाखापिगडाला शाखापिगडाला शाखा
िपन : 518 360
डोर सं. 2-12, पिगडाला,
नंदिकोटकू र तालूक
7. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कनू र्ल
सीमेंट नगर शाखासीमेंट नगर शाखासीमेंट नगर शाखासीमेंट नगर शाखा
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
डी सं.डी 1 एवं 2,
पनियम सीमेंट kार्टर्स
िपन : 518 401
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
13. सिडिके ट बैंक
गोविदापल्ली शाखागोविदापल्ली शाखागोविदापल्ली शाखागोविदापल्ली शाखा
िपन : 518 206
गोविदापल्ली
िजला : कनू र्ल
8. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
23ावरम शाखा23ावरम शाखा23ावरम शाखा23ावरम शाखा
मेन रोड, l(cid:3)ावरम
िपन : 518 502
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
14. सिडिके ट बैंक
कं दकू र शाखाकं दकू र शाखाकं दकू र शाखाकं दकू र शाखा
िपन : 518 594
कं दकू र
िजला : कनू र्ल
9. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
यल्लूर शाखायल्लूर शाखायल्लूर शाखायल्लूर शाखा मेन रोड, यल्लूर
िपन : 518 313
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
15. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 518 573
र्ल सी कैं प शाखा र्ल सी कैं प शाखाकनू र्ल सी कैं प शाखाकनू कनू र्ल सी कैं प शाखाकनू mीनगर कॉलोनी, नंद्याल रोड
िजला : कनू र्ल
10. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
संजमाला शाखासंजमाला शाखासंजमाला शाखासंजमाला शाखा
मेन रोड, संजमाला
िपन : 518 002
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
16. सिडिके ट बैंक
कनू र्ल एसकनू र्ल एसकनू र्ल एसकनू र्ल एसएमई शाखाएमई शाखाएमई शाखाएमई शाखा
िपन : 518 165
इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, कनू र्ल
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
11. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 518 003
ओरवकल शाखाओरवकल शाखाओरवकल शाखाओरवकल शाखा2882 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 17. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कनू र्ल
मंत्रालयम शाखामंत्रालयम शाखामंत्रालयम शाखामंत्रालयम शाखा
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
एन पी शेट गेस्ट हाउस,
िपन : 518 452
mी राघवें(cid:3) स्वामी मठ, मंत्रालयम
िजला : कनू र्ल
23. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
इल्लू2 कोथापेटा शाखाइल्लू2 कोथापेटा शाखाइल्लू2 कोथापेटा शाखाइल्लू2 कोथापेटा शाखा
िपन : 518 345
इल्लूर कोथापेटा
िजला : कनू र्ल
18. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
नंद्याल टेक्के शाखा
िपन : 518 186
डोर सं. 29/196, टेpे नंद्याल
िजला : कनू र्ल
24. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
कनू र्ल बालाजीनगर शाखा र्ल बालाजीनगर शाखाकनू र्ल बालाजीनगर शाखाकनू र्ल बालाजीनगर शाखाकनू
िपन : 518 502
डी सं. 45/142-31-डी-2-1,
रामलिगेश्वर नगर
19. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कनू र्ल
धोने शाखाधोने शाखाधोने शाखाधोने शाखा
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
7-178, राजा शापिग सेंटर,
िपन : 518 002
कचहरी रोड
िजला : कनू र्ल
25. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
कालुगो<ला शाखाकालुगो<ला शाखाकालुगो<ला शाखाकालुगो<ला शाखा
िपन : 518 222
कालुगोqला
िजला : कनू र्ल
20. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
पेपेपेपेद6हद6हद6हद6हरिवनम शाखारिवनम शाखारिवनम शाखारिवनम शाखा
िपन : 518 217
सी/ओ वाई एल एम कल्याणमंडपम,
चेकपोस्ट के सामने
िजला : कनू र्ल
26. सिडिके ट बैंक
नंद्याल आर एस रोड शाखा
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
एरासी पैराडैस के पास,
िपन : 518 308
नंद्याल मुनिसिपल कार्यालय के सामने
िजला : कनू र्ल
21. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 518 501
मािमडालपाडु शाखामािमडालपाडु शाखामािमडालपाडु शाखामािमडालपाडु शाखा मािमडालपाडु
िजला : कनू र्ल
27. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
कनू र्ल हाउसिग बोर्ड कॉलोनी शाखा र्ल हाउसिग बोर्ड कॉलोनी शाखाकनू र्ल हाउसिग बोर्ड कॉलोनी शाखाकनू र्ल हाउसिग बोर्ड कॉलोनी शाखाकनू
िपन : 518 004
मेन रोड, कनू र्ल
िजला : कनू र्ल
22. सिडिके ट बैंक
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
पसुपुला शाखापसुपुला शाखापसुपुला शाखापसुपुला शाखा
िपन : 518 501
पसुपुला[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2883 28. सिडिके ट बैंक
पोदिली शाखापोदिली शाखापोदिली शाखापोदिली शाखा
डोर सं. 4-148(7),
रतहाम रोड, पोदिली
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 523 240
29. सिडिके ट बैंक
मंगमूर शाखामंगमूर शाखामंगमूर शाखामंगमूर शाखा
मेन रोड, मंगमूर
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 523 255
30. सिडिके ट बैंक
अ@ंकि अ@ंकि अ@ंकि अ@ंकि शाखाशाखाशाखाशाखा
अ2ंकि ओंगोल रोड,
mीनिवासनगर
िजला : कनू र्ल
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 523 201
31. सिडिके ट बैंक
बामणगाम शाखाबामणगाम शाखाबामणगाम शाखाबामणगाम शाखा
mी नोबल rूप ऑफ इंस्ट्यिूशन्स, जूनागढ
िजला : अहमदाबाद
राज्य : गुजरात
िपन : 362 310
32. सिडिके ट बैंक
मझेली शाखामझेली शाखामझेली शाखामझेली शाखा
मझेली चौक,
एस आर पेट्रोल पंप के पास
िजला : पूvणया
राज्य : िबहार
िपन : 854 337
33. सिडिके ट बैंक
कोरजाना शाखाकोरजाना शाखाकोरजाना शाखाकोरजाना शाखा
rाम कोरजाना, पोस्ट बसही
िजला : बेगुसराय
राज्य : िबहार
िपन : 848 202
34. सिडिके ट बैंक
नाचारम शाखानाचारम शाखानाचारम शाखानाचारम शाखा
डी सं.4-1-13/1,
नाचारम मेन रोड,
हेरिटेज माल के सामने
िजला : रंगारेwी
राज्य : तेलंगाना
िपन : 500 076
35. सिडिके ट बैंक
खुदरा ऋण कें 3 उडुपि खुदरा ऋण कें 3 उडुपि खुदरा ऋण कें 3 उडुपि खुदरा ऋण कें 3 उडुपि
सिडिके ट टॉवर, चतुर्थ तल,
के एम मार्ग, िजला : उडुिप
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 576 101
36. सिडिके ट बैंक
िविविविवदयादयादयादयानगर शाखानगर शाखानगर शाखानगर शाखा
पी.बी.सं. 70, सूपर माकF ट
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 028
37. सिडिके ट बैंक
धारवाड मुख्य शाखाधारवाड मुख्य शाखाधारवाड मुख्य शाखाधारवाड मुख्य शाखा
सुभाष रोड
िजला : धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 001
38. सिडिके ट बैंक
गदग शाखागदग शाखागदग शाखागदग शाखा
पहली मंिजल,
डॉ एन एस कु ं भारवाडी बिल्डिग
िजला : गदग
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 1012884 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 39. सिडिके ट बैंक
ब्याडगी शाखाब्याडगी शाखाब्याडगी शाखाब्याडगी शाखा
मिर्च xापारी संग बिल्डिग,
हंसभावी रोड
िजला : ब्याडगी
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581106
40. सिडिके ट बैंक
ंकु कु ंकु ंकु ं दगोल शाखादगोल शाखादगोल शाखादगोल शाखा
एस.टी. बालिकाई बिल्डिग,
कािलदास नगर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 113
41. सिडिके ट बैंक
ब्याहEी शाखाब्याहEी शाखाब्याहEी शाखाब्याहEी शाखा
853/854, rामोद्योग संघ बिल्डिग,
होरके रे गली
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 124
42. सिडिके ट बैंक
ननननरगु ंद शाखा ंद शाखारगु ंद शाखारगु ंद शाखारगु
सिद्देzर कृ पा, कें पागसी रोड
िजला : नरगु ंद
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 207
43. सिडिके ट बैंक
लक्कु ं डी शाखा ं डी शाखालक्कु ं डी शाखालक्कु ं डी शाखालक्कु
पहली मंजिल, पंचायत बिल्डिग
िजला : गदग
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 115
44. सिडिके ट बैंक
अलदकअलदकअलदकअलदकटटीटटीटटीटटी शाखाशाखाशाखाशाखा
एस के देशपांडे बिल्डिग, बेलगलपेट िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 127
45. सिडिके ट बैंक
बेलवंकी शाखाबेलवंकी शाखाबेलवंकी शाखाबेलवंकी शाखा
वी.के पाटील बिल्डिग, रोण रोड
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 202
46. सिडिके ट बैंक
राणेबेराणेबेराणेबेराणेबेन्नून्नून्नून्नूरररर शाखाशाखाशाखाशाखा
राजराजेश्वरी काम्प्लेक्स,
के एसआरटीसी बस स्टैंड के पास
िजला : राणेबेन्नूर
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 115
47. सिडिके ट बैंक
धारवाड सत्तूर शाखाधारवाड सत्तूर शाखाधारवाड सत्तूर शाखाधारवाड सत्तूर शाखा
पत्रावती फार्मस,
इंडस्ट्रियल एस्टेट, सत्तूर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 002
48. सिडिके ट बैंक
िसडेनूर शाखािसडेनूर शाखािसडेनूर शाखािसडेनूर शाखा
तहसील ब्याडगी
िजला : ब्याडगी
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 228 304
49. सिडिके ट बैंक
एपीएमसी Iबली शाखाएपीएमसी Iबली शाखाएपीएमसी Iबली शाखाएपीएमसी Iबली शाखा
एपीएमसी माकF ट यार्ड, अमरगोल
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 025[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2885 50. सिडिके ट बैंक
बेंगेरी Iबली शाखाबेंगेरी Iबली शाखाबेंगेरी Iबली शाखाबेंगेरी Iबली शाखा
कर्नाटक rामोद्योग फे डरेशन,
पो.आ बेंगेरी
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 002
51. सिडिके ट बैंक
के एलई सोसाइटी कैं पस शाखाके एलई सोसाइटी कैं पस शाखाके एलई सोसाइटी कैं पस शाखाके एलई सोसाइटी कैं पस शाखा
पीसी जॉिबन कॉलेज, विद्यानगर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 583 031
52. सिडिके ट बैंक
Iबली के एमसी विद्यानगर शाखाIबली के एमसी विद्यानगर शाखाIबली के एमसी विद्यानगर शाखाIबली के एमसी विद्यानगर शाखा
कर्णाटक मेडिकल कॉलेज बिल्डिग, विद्यानगर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 021
53. सिडिके ट बैंक
नेह2 नगर Iबली शाखानेह2 नगर Iबली शाखानेह2 नगर Iबली शाखानेह2 नगर Iबली शाखा
गोकु ल रोड, उद्यम नगर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 030
54. सिडिके ट बैंक
बीवीबी इंजीनियKरग कॉलेज शाखाबीवीबी इंजीनियKरग कॉलेज शाखाबीवीबी इंजीनियKरग कॉलेज शाखाबीवीबी इंजीनियKरग कॉलेज शाखा
विद्यानगर, बीवीबी कॉलेज कैं पस
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 031
55. सिडिके ट बैंक
सेवा शाखासेवा शाखासेवा शाखासेवा शाखा सिद्देzर कृ पा,
पुणे बेंगलूर रोड, विद्यानगर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 021
56. सिडिके ट बैंक
सुल्ला शाखासुल्ला शाखासुल्ला शाखासुल्ला शाखा
सुल्ला गाँव
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 023
57. सिडिके ट बैंक
बरदवाड शाखाबरदवाड शाखाबरदवाड शाखाबरदवाड शाखा
पंचायत बिल्डिग, बरदवाड
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 117
58. सिडिके ट बैंक
पडेसुर शाखापडेसुर शाखापडेसुर शाखापडेसुर शाखा
बस स्टैंड के पास, पडेसुर
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 208
59. सिडिके ट बैंक
बिनकदकEी शाखाबिनकदकEी शाखाबिनकदकEी शाखाबिनकदकEी शाखा
येल्लम्मा देवी टेंपल रोड,
बिनकदक}ी
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 103
60. सिडिके ट बैंक
शिग्गाव शाखाशिग्गाव शाखाशिग्गाव शाखाशिग्गाव शाखा
प्लॉट नं. 19,
टीएम संख्या 2424/1-2-3,
पुराने बस स्टैंड के पास
िजला : शिग्गाव
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 2052886 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
61. सिडिके ट बैंक करडी बिल्डिग,
सवनूर शाखासवनूर शाखासवनूर शाखासवनूर शाखा एपीएमसी के सामने,
डॉ. तेगिहल्ली बिल्डिग, टीजी रोड
एसबीआई के पास िजला : हानगल
िजला : हावेरी राज्य : कर्नाटक
राज्य : कर्नाटक िपन : 581 104
िपन : 581 104
67. सिडिके ट बैंक
62. सिडिके ट बैंक तिम्मापुर शाखातिम्मापुर शाखातिम्मापुर शाखातिम्मापुर शाखा
हीरेके 2र शाखाहीरेके 2र शाखाहीरेके 2र शाखाहीरेके 2र शाखा rाम पंचायत पुस्तकालय बिल्डिग,
कु लकर्णी प्लॉजा, नरेवाड गांव
पहली मंिजल, मेन रोड िजला : धारवाड
िजला : हीरेकlर राज्य : कर्नाटक
राज्य : कर्नाटक िपन : 581 201
िपन : 581 111
68. सिडिके ट बैंक
63. सिडिके ट बैंक लखमापूर शाखालखमापूर शाखालखमापूर शाखालखमापूर शाखा
मसनकEी शाखामसनकEी शाखामसनकEी शाखामसनकEी शाखा rाम पंचायत बिल्डिग,
xवसाय सहकारी संघ बिल्डिग, येडवाड गांव
हानगल रोड िजला : धारवाड
िजला : हावेरी राज्य : कर्नाटक
राज्य : कर्नाटक िपन : 581 206
िपन : 581 104
69. सिडिके ट बैंक
64. सिडिके ट बैंक हरोबेलवाडी शाखाहरोबेलवाडी शाखाहरोबेलवाडी शाखाहरोबेलवाडी शाखा
गजें3गढ शाखागजें3गढ शाखागजें3गढ शाखागजें3गढ शाखा rाम पंचायत बिल्डिग,
डॉ. मलागी कॉप्लेक्स, हरोबेलवाडी
कु श्तगी रोड, रोण िजला : धारवाड
िजला : गजें(cid:3)गढ राज्य : कर्नाटक
राज्य : कर्नाटक िपन : 581 201
िपन : 582 114
70. सिडिके ट बैंक
65. सिडिके ट बैंक मलसमु3ा शाखामलसमु3ा शाखामलसमु3ा शाखामलसमु3ा शाखा
रोण शाखारोण शाखारोण शाखारोण शाखा गदग इनस्टि(cid:130)ूट ऑफ मेडिकल साइन्स कैं पस
mी दौलतगौडा बिल्डिग, िजला : गदग
जवकाली रोड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िजला : रोण
िपन : 582 103
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 582 209
71. सिडिके ट बैंक
अलनावर शाखाअलनावर शाखाअलनावर शाखाअलनावर शाखा
66. सिडिके ट बैंक शॉप सं. 04, सीटीएस सं. 401/डी,
हानगल शाखाहानगल शाखाहानगल शाखाहानगल शाखा
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2887
रेणुका कॉप्लेक्स
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 103
72. सिडिके ट बैंक
धारवाड तेजस्वीनगर शाखाधारवाड तेजस्वीनगर शाखाधारवाड तेजस्वीनगर शाखाधारवाड तेजस्वीनगर शाखा
14184/2सी/आरएस सं.62 सी,
प्लॉट सं. 22 ए, िजला : धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 001
73. सिडिके ट बैंक
हेडिगोंडा शाखाहेडिगोंडा शाखाहेडिगोंडा शाखाहेडिगोंडा शाखा rाम पंचायत बिल्डिग,
तालुक ब्याडगी
िजला : हावेरी
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 110
74. सिडिके ट बैंक
शि2र पार्क Iबली शाखाशि2र पार्क Iबली शाखाशि2र पार्क Iबली शाखाशि2र पार्क Iबली शाखा
चwा बिल्डिग,
मोर सूपर माकF ट के आगे
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 031
75. सिडिके ट बैंक
खुदरा ऋण कें 3 Iबलीखुदरा ऋण कें 3 Iबलीखुदरा ऋण कें 3 Iबलीखुदरा ऋण कें 3 Iबली शानबाग बिल्डिग, उन्कल <ास,
साई नगर रोड
िजला : hबली-धारवाड
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 580 031
76. सिडिके ट बैंक
कल्लेदेवा2 शाखाकल्लेदेवा2 शाखाकल्लेदेवा2 शाखाकल्लेदेवा2 शाखा
rाम पंचायत बिल्डिग,
पोस्ट कल्लेदेवाl
िजला : हावेरी
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 581 106
77. सिडिके ट बैंक
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शिवमोग्गाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शिवमोग्गाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शिवमोग्गाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय शिवमोग्गा
पहला तल, सनमान रीजेंसी, नेहl रोड
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 201
78. सिडिके ट बैंक
सिद्देPरा नगर शाखासिद्देPरा नगर शाखासिद्देPरा नगर शाखासिद्देPरा नगर शाखा
साइट सं. 4/2005,
वार्ड सं. 1, होलेहोन्नूर रोड
िजला : शिवमोग्गा, राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 203
79. सिडिके ट बैंक
आगु ंबे शाखा ंबे शाखाआगु ंबे शाखाआगु ंबे शाखाआगु
नंदगोकु ल बिल्डिग,
मेन रोड, तीर्थहल्ली तालुक
िजला : िशवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 411
80. सिडिके ट बैंक
सागर शाखासागर शाखासागर शाखासागर शाखा
एसपीएम रोड, सागर
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 401
81. सिडिके ट बैंक
सोरब शाखासोरब शाखासोरब शाखासोरब शाखा
शुभोदया, मेन रोड <ास, सोरब
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 429
82. सिडिके ट बैंक
कु ं सी शाखा ं सी शाखाकु ं सी शाखाकु ं सी शाखाकु2888 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] पTावती निलया, बी एच रोड
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 423
83. सिडिके ट बैंक
अमीर अहमद सQकल शाखाअमीर अहमद सQकल शाखाअमीर अहमद सQकल शाखाअमीर अहमद सQकल शाखा
बी एच रोड, ए ए सjकल
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 201
84. सिडिके ट बैंक
गांधीबाजार मेन रोड शाखागांधीबाजार मेन रोड शाखागांधीबाजार मेन रोड शाखागांधीबाजार मेन रोड शाखा
गांधीबाजार
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 201
85. सिडिके ट बैंक
शिरालकोप्पा शाखाशिरालकोप्पा शाखाशिरालकोप्पा शाखाशिरालकोप्पा शाखा
एम एन पिकल इंडस्ट्रियल बिल्डिग,
बस स्टैंड के पास
िजला : शिवमोग्गा
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 577 428
86. सिडिके ट बैंक
मालतीपुर शाखामालतीपुर शाखामालतीपुर शाखामालतीपुर शाखा मुख्य रोड मालतीपुर, पोस्ट-चैता
िजला : उत्तर 24 परगना
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 743 445
87. सिडिके ट बैंक
कालूपुर शाखाकालूपुर शाखाकालूपुर शाखाकालूपुर शाखा
गाँव कालूपुर, थाना बंगांव
िजला : उत्तर 24 परगना
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 743 235
88. सिडिके ट बैंक
आर बी एवेन्यू शाखाआर बी एवेन्यू शाखाआर बी एवेन्यू शाखाआर बी एवेन्यू शाखा
134, रासबिहारी एवेन्यू,
देशप्रिय पार्क <ासिग
िजला :कोलकाता
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 700 029
89. सिडिके ट बैंक
पुरातन बंगांव शाखापुरातन बंगांव शाखापुरातन बंगांव शाखापुरातन बंगांव शाखा
गांव व पोस्ट – पुरातन बंगांव
िजला : उत्तर 24 परगना
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 743 235
90. सिडिके ट बैंक
िशबपुर शाखािशबपुर शाखािशबपुर शाखािशबपुर शाखा
493/सी/ए, जी टी रोड,
िववेक िवहार, हावडा
िजला : कोलकाता
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 711 102
91. सिडिके ट बैंक
राजरहाट शाखाराजरहाट शाखाराजरहाट शाखाराजरहाट शाखा
ओरचिड प्लॉजा, काठगोला
िजला : राजरहाट
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 700 136
92. सिडिके ट बैंक
कोलकाता पूर्वलोक शाखाकोलकाता पूर्वलोक शाखाकोलकाता पूर्वलोक शाखाकोलकाता पूर्वलोक शाखा
वार्ड सं. 109,
माlति शो रूम के पास,
434 सवF पार्क , िजला : कोलकाता
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िपन : 700 099
93. सिडिके ट बैंक
सेंट ज़ेवियर यूनिवUसटी शाखासेंट ज़ेवियर यूनिवUसटी शाखासेंट ज़ेवियर यूनिवUसटी शाखासेंट ज़ेवियर यूनिवUसटी शाखा
सेंट ज़ेवियर कॉलेज कैं पस,
थाना न्यू टाउन राजरहाट[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2889 99. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कोलकाता
प्रशिक्षण कें 3 कोलकाता प्रशिक्षण कें 3 कोलकाता प्रशिक्षण कें 3 कोलकाता प्रशिक्षण कें 3 कोलकाता
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
226बी, आर बी एवेन्यू
िपन : 700 156
िजला : कोलकाता
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
94. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 700 019
नयाबाद शाखानयाबाद शाखानयाबाद शाखानयाबाद शाखा
वार्ड सं.109, 1277,
थाना पूर्व यादवपुर
100. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कोलकाता
कै म्टी फॉल्स शाखाकै म्टी फॉल्स शाखाकै म्टी फॉल्स शाखाकै म्टी फॉल्स शाखा
rाम एवं पोस्ट-कै म्टी,
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
कै म्टी फॉल के पास
िपन : 700 099
िजला : टिहरी गढवाल
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
95. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 248 179
बैंची शाखाबैंची शाखाबैंची शाखाबैंची शाखा बैंची एएलयू xवसायी कल्याण समिति,
101. सिडिके ट बैंक
जी टी रोड
िजला : hगली
हिडोलाखाल शाखाहिडोलाखाल शाखाहिडोलाखाल शाखाहिडोलाखाल शाखा देवप्रयाग रोड,
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
rाम एवं पोस्ट- हिडोलाखाल
िपन : 712 134
िजला : टिहरी गढवाल
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
96. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 249 122
आरामबाग शाखाआरामबाग शाखाआरामबाग शाखाआरामबाग शाखा
वार्ड सं. 5, लिक रोड,
102. सिडिके ट बैंक
स्पंदन न(cid:135)सग होम के नजदीक
पी2मदारा शाखापी2मदारा शाखापी2मदारा शाखापी2मदारा शाखा
िजला : कोलकाता
rाम एवं पोस्ट पीlमदारा
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िजला : नैनीताल
िपन : 712 601
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 244 715
97. सिडिके ट बैंक
103. सिडिके ट बैंक
बीडीएमआई नरें3पुर शाखाबीडीएमआई नरें3पुर शाखाबीडीएमआई नरें3पुर शाखाबीडीएमआई नरें3पुर शाखा बीडी मेमोरियल इंस्टि(cid:130)ूट ,
दुर्गापुरदुर्गापुरदुर्गापुरदुर्गापुर----2 शाखा2 शाखा2 शाखा2 शाखा
मेन रोड, िजला : कोलकाता
दिनेशपुर रोड, तहसील गदरपुर
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
िजला : उधमसिह नगर
िपन : 743 000
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
98. सिडिके ट बैंक
िपन : 263 160
मिड कॉपVरेट कोलकाता शाखा मिड कॉपVरेट कोलकाता शाखा मिड कॉपVरेट कोलकाता शाखा मिड कॉपVरेट कोलकाता शाखा
एन एस रोड कोलकाता
104. सिडिके ट बैंक
िजला : कोलकाता
िनराना शाखािनराना शाखािनराना शाखािनराना शाखा
राज्य : प(िcid:132)म बंगाल
rाम निराना, पोस्ट ऑफिस भिpी िपन : 700 0012890 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] िजला : मुज(cid:136)फरनगर
राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
िपन : 251 203
105. सिडिके ट बैंक
मरगूबपुर डीडाहेडी शाखामरगूबपुर डीडाहेडी शाखामरगूबपुर डीडाहेडी शाखामरगूबपुर डीडाहेडी शाखा
rाम एवं पोस्ट-मरगूबपुर डीडाहेडी, तहसील lडकी
िजला : हरिद्वार
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 247 667
106. सिडिके ट बैंक
ई सी रोड शाखाई सी रोड शाखाई सी रोड शाखाई सी रोड शाखा
वंश टॉवर, 3 ई सी रोड,
डीएवी चौक के पास
िजला : देहरादून
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 248 001
107. सिडिके ट बैंक
फकोट शाखाफकोट शाखाफकोट शाखाफकोट शाखा
rाम एवं पोस्ट आगराखाल, िनउ आगराखाल
िजला : टिहरी गढवाल
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 249 175
108. सिडिके ट बैंक
रायवाला शाखारायवाला शाखारायवाला शाखारायवाला शाखा
मोहल्ला प्रतीतनगर, रायवाला
िजला : देहरादून
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 249 205
109. सिडिके ट बैंक
लक्सर शाखालक्सर शाखालक्सर शाखालक्सर शाखा
गोवर्धन रोड,
पुरकाजी बस स्टैंड के पास,
तहसील ितराहा
िजला : हरिद्वार
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 247 663
110. सिडिके ट बैंक
बागेPर शाखाबागेPर शाखाबागेPर शाखाबागेPर शाखा
होटल आशीष,
तहसील रोड बागेzर
िजला : बागेzर
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 263 642
111. सिडिके ट बैंक
खटीमा शाखाखटीमा शाखाखटीमा शाखाखटीमा शाखा
तहसील ऑफिस के सामने, िसतारगंज रोड
िजला : उधमसिह नगर
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 262 308
112. सिडिके ट बैंक
िवकासनगर शाखािवकासनगर शाखािवकासनगर शाखािवकासनगर शाखा मेन माकF ट, ओबीसी के पास
िजला : देहरादून
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 248 142
113. सिडिके ट बैंक
टनकपुर शाखाटनकपुर शाखाटनकपुर शाखाटनकपुर शाखा
डिrी कॉलेज के सामने,
वार्ड सं. 9, चंपावत रोड
िजला : चंपावत
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 262 309
114. सिडिके ट बैंक
धारचूला देहात शाखाधारचूला देहात शाखाधारचूला देहात शाखाधारचूला देहात शाखा
rाम फु ल्तडी, तहसील धारचूला
िजला : िपथौरागढ
राज्य : उत्तराखंड
िपन : 262 545[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2891 115. सिडिके ट बैंक
सहारनपुर रासहारनपुर रासहारनपुर रासहारनपुर रायवाला शाखायवाला शाखायवाला शाखायवाला शाखा
मोतीमहल, मंडी सिमित रोड, रायवाला
िजला : सहारनपुर
राज्य : उत्तरप्रदेश
िपन : 247 001
116. सिडिके ट बैंक
आंचलिक कार्यालय मणिपालआंचलिक कार्यालय मणिपालआंचलिक कार्यालय मणिपालआंचलिक कार्यालय मणिपाल
प्रधान कार्यालय एनेक्स
िजला : उडुिप
राज्य : कर्नाटक
िपन : 576 104
117. सिडिके ट बैंक
िचलकलूरीपेट शाखािचलकलूरीपेट शाखािचलकलूरीपेट शाखािचलकलूरीपेट शाखा
चीराला रोड, मोडर्न के फे बिल्डिग
िजला : गु ंटूर
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 522 616
118. सिडिके ट बैंक
मंगलागिरि शाखामंगलागिरि शाखामंगलागिरि शाखामंगलागिरि शाखा
# 1-1344, अस्पताल रोड,
दक्षिण गालिगोपुरम गली
िजला : गु ंटूर
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 522 503
119. सिडिके ट बैंक
अमरावती शाखाअमरावती शाखाअमरावती शाखाअमरावती शाखा
# 10-110, कचेरी सेंटर,
प्रधान मार्ग
िजला : गु ंटूर
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 522 020
120. सिडिके ट बैंक
बापटला शाखाबापटला शाखाबापटला शाखाबापटला शाखा
डी सं. 4-2-32,
एसएनपी अrहारम,
जीबीसी रोड
िजला : गु ंटूर
राज्य : आंfप्रदेश
िपन : 522 101
121. सिडिके ट बैंक
आर एम एल सी िवजयवाडा शाखाआर एम एल सी िवजयवाडा शाखाआर एम एल सी िवजयवाडा शाखाआर एम एल सी िवजयवाडा शाखा
डी सं. 40-13-15, तीसरा तल,
mी रामचं(cid:3) काम्प्लेक्स
िजला : िवजयवाडा
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 520 010
122. सिडिके ट बैंक
चोडवरम शाखाचोडवरम शाखाचोडवरम शाखाचोडवरम शाखा
# 4-50, मेन रोड,
डाक घर के सामने
िजला : कृ ष्णा
राज्य : आंf प्रदेश
िपन : 521 139
123. सिडिके ट बैंक
महल शाखामहल शाखामहल शाखामहल शाखा
rाम एवं पोस्ट ऑफिस महल
िजला : मेरठ
राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
िपन : 250 222
124. सिडिके ट बैंक
पीपलीखेडा शाखापीपलीखेडा शाखापीपलीखेडा शाखापीपलीखेडा शाखा
पोस्ट ऑफिस खरखौदा
िजला : मेरठ2892 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
िपन : 245 206
िपन : 250 342
125. सिडिके ट बैंक
126. सिडिके ट बैंक
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ऩोएडाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ऩोएडाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ऩोएडाक्षेत्रीय कार्यालय ऩोएडा
िपथलोकर शाखािपथलोकर शाखािपथलोकर शाखािपथलोकर शाखा
ऩोएडा माकF ट, नोएडा सेक्टर-16 rाम एवं पोस्ट ऑफिस पिथलोकर
िजला : गौतमबु2मगर
िजला : मेरठ
राज्य : उत्तर प्रदेश
िपन : 201 301
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2019
S.O. 753.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987),the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of Syndicate Bank, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:—
| erial No. | Name of the Bank | Number of Offices/ Branches |
| 1. | Syndicate Bank | 126 |
| Total | 126 |
[F. No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of Branches/Offices to be notified under Rule 10(4) in the Gazette of Government of India
1. Syndicate Bank 4. Syndicate Bank
Rolla Branch Maddikera Branch
6-107, Ratnagiri Road D.No.4/131, Main Road
Rolla Maddikera
Dist: Ananthapuram Dist: Kurnool
State : Andhra Pradesh State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 515 321 Pin : 518 385
2. Syndicate Bank 5. Syndicate Bank
Adoni Branch Sirvel Branch
P N Road D.No. 439-1A,
Adoni Hssain Nagar
Dist: Kurnool Sirvel
State : Andhra Pradesh Dist: Kurnool
Pin : 518 301 State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 518 563
3. Syndicate Bank
Banganpally Branch 6. Syndicate Bank
9-266, Main Road Yemmiganur Branch
Banganpally 1/395, Somappa Circle
Dist: Kurnool Bus Stand Road
State : Andhra Pradesh Dist: Kurnool
Pin : 518 124 State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 518 360
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2893
7. Syndicate Bank
State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 313
15. Syndicate Bank
Cement Nagar Branch D.No. D 1 & 2 Panyam Cement Qtrs Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 206
8. Syndicate Bank
Kurnool C Camp Branch Srinagar Colony Nandyal Road Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 002
16. Syndicate Bank
Rudravaram Branch Main Road Rudravaram Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 594
Kurnool SME Branch Industrial Estate Kurnool Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 003
17. Syndicate Bank
9. Syndicate Bank Yallur Branch Main Road Yallur Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 573
10. Syndicate Bank
Matralayam Branch N P Shet Guest House, Sri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt Mantralayam Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 345
18. Syndicate Bank
Sanjamala Branch Main Road Sanjamala Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 165
11. Syndicate Bank
Nandyal Tekke Branch D.No. 29/196 Tekke Nandyal Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 502
Orvakal Branch D.No.8/8A Near Bus Stand Orvakal Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 010
12. Syndicate Bank
19. Syndicate Bank Dhone Branch 7-178, Raja Shopping Centre Court Road Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 222
20. Syndicate Bank
Pagidala Branch D.No. 2-12 Pagidala Nandokotkur Taluk Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 401
13. Syndicate Bank
Peddaharivanam Branch C/O YLM Kalyanmantapam Opposite Checkpost Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 308
21. Syndicate Bank
Govindapalli Branch Govindapalli Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 502
14. Syndicate Bank
Mamidalapadu Branch Mamidalapadu Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 518 004
22. Syndicate Bank
Kandukur Branch Kandukur Dist: Kurnool
Pasupula Branch
2894 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Pasupula Dist: Kurnool
Dist: Kurnool State : Andhra Pradesh
State : Andhra Pradesh Pin : 523 201
Pin : 518 452
23. Syndicate Bank 31. Syndicate Bank
Illuru Kothapeta Branch Bamangam Branch
Illuru Kothapeta Shri Noble Group Of Institutions
Dist: Kurnool Junagadh
State : Andhra Pradesh Dist: Ahmedabad
Pin : 518 186 State : Gujarat
Pin : 362 310
24. Syndicate Bank
Kurnool Balajinagar Branch
D,No.45/142-31-D-2-1 32. Syndicate Bank
Ramalingeshwar Nagar Majheli Branch
Dist: Kurnool Majheli Chowk
State : Andhra Pradesh Near S R Petrol Pump
Pin : 518 002 Dist: Purnia
State : Bihar
25. Syndicate Bank Pin : 854 337
Kalugotla Branch
Kalugotla 33. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Kurnool Korzana Branch
State : Andhra Pradesh Gram Korzana
Pin : 518 217 Post Basahi
Dist: Begusarai
26. Syndicate Bank State : Bihar
Nandyal R S Road Branch Pin : 848 202
Near Erasi Paradise
Opposite Nandyal Municipal Office 34. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Kurnool Nacharam Branch
State : Andhra Pradesh D.No.4-1-13/1,
Pin : 518 501 Nacharam Main Road
Opposite Heritage Mall
27. Syndicate Bank Dist: Rangareddy
Nandyal Housing Board Colony Branch State : Telangana
Main Road Pin : 500 076
Kurnool
Dist: Kurnool 35. Syndicate Bank
State : Andhra Pradesh Retail Loan Centre Udupi
Pin : 518 501 Syndicate Tower,
Fourth Floor
28. Syndicate Bank KM Marg
Podili Branch Dist: Udupi
D.No.4-148(7) State : Karnataka
Ratham Road, Podili Pin : 576 101
Dist: Kurnool
State : Andhra Pradesh 36. Syndicate Bank
Pin : 523 240 Vidyanagar Branch
PB No.70
29. Syndicate Bank Super Market
Mangamur Branch Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
Main Road State : Karnataka
Mangamur Pin : 580 028
Dist: Kurnool
State : Andhra Pradesh 37. Syndicate Bank
Pin : 523 255 Dharwad Main Branch
Subhas Road
30. Syndicate Bank Dist: Dharwad
Addanki Branch State : Karnataka
Addanki Ongole Road Pin : 580 001
Srinivasnagar
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2895
38. Syndicate Bank Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
Gadag Branch State : Karnataka
First Floor Pin : 582 202
Dr NS Kumbharwadi Building
Dist: Gadag 46. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Ranebennur Branch
Pin : 582 101 Rajarajeshwari Complex
Near KSRTC Bus Stand
39. Syndicate Bank Dist: Ranebennur
Byadgi Branch State : Karnataka
Chilly Merchants Association Building Pin : 581 115
Hamsbhavi Road
Dist: Byadgi 47. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Dharwad Sattur Branch
Pin : 581 106 Patravati Farms
Industrial Estate, Sattur
40. Syndicate Bank Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
Kundgol Branch State : Karnataka
ST Balikai Building Pin : 580 002
Kalidas Nagar
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad 48. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Sidenur Branch
Pin : 581 113 Tehsil Byadgi
Dist: Byadgi
41. Syndicate Bank State : Karnataka
Byahatti Branch Pin : 228 304
853/854,
Gramodyoga Sangh Building 49. Syndicate Bank
Horekere Galli APMC Hubbballi Branch
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad APMC Market Yard
State : Karnataka Amargol
Pin : 581 124 Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka
42. Syndicate Bank Pin : 580 025
Nargund Branch
Siddeshwar Kripa 50. Syndicate Bank
Kempagsi Road Bengeri Hubballi Branch
Dist: Nargund Karnataka Gramodyog Federation
State : Karnataka Post Office Bengeri
Pin : 582 207 Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka
43. Syndicate Bank Pin : 580 002
Lakkundi Branch
First Floor 51. Syndicate Bank
Panchayat Building KLE Society Campus Branch
Dist: Gadag PC Jabin Colleague
State : Karnataka Vidyanagar
Pin : 582 115 Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka
44. Syndicate Bank Pin : 583 031
Aladkatti Branch
SK Deshpande Building 52. Syndicate Bank
Belgalpet Hubballi KMC Vidyanagar Branch
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad Karnataka Medical College Building
State : Karnataka Vidyanagar
Pin : 581 127 Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka
Pin : 580 021
45. Syndicate Bank
Belavanki Branch 53. Syndicate Bank
VK Patil Building Nehru Nagar Hubballi Branch
Ron Road Gokul Road
2896 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Udyam Nagar 61. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad Savanur Branch
State : Karnataka Dr. Tegihallis Building
Pin : 580 030 Near SBI
Dist: Haveri
54. Syndicate Bank State : Karnataka
BVB Engineering College Branch Pin : 581 104
Vidyanagar
BVB College Campus 62. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad Hirekerur Branch
State : Karnataka Kulkarni Plaza,
Pin : 580 031 First Floor
Main Road
55. Syndicate Bank Dist: Hirekerur
Service Branch State : Karnataka
Siddeshwar Kripa Pin : 581 111
Pune Bengaluru Road,
Vidyanagar 63. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad Masanakatti Branch
State : Karnataka Vyvasaya Sahakari Sangha Building
Pin : 580 021 Hangal Road
Dist: Haveri
56. Syndicate Bank State : Karnataka
Sulla Branch Pin : 581 104
Sulla Village
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad 64. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Gajendragad Branch
Pin : 580 023 Dr. Malagi Complex
Kushtagi Road, Ron
57. Syndicate Bank Dist: Gajendragad
Bardwad Branch State : Karnataka
Panchayat Building Pin : 582 114
Bardwad
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad 65. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Ron Branch
Pin : 581 117 Mr.Daulathgouda Building
Jakkali Road
58. Syndicate Bank Dist: Ron
Padesur Branch State : Karnataka
Near Bus Stand Pin : 582 209
Padesur
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad 66. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Hanagal Branch
Pin : 582 208 Karadi Building
Opposite APMC, TG Road
59. Syndicate Bank Dist: Hanagal
Binakadakatti Branch State : Karnataka
Yellammadevi Temple Road Pin : 581 104
Binakadakatti
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad 67. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Thimmapur Branch
Pin : 582 103 Library Building of Gram Panchayat
Narewad Village
60. Syndicate Bank Dist: Dharwad
Shiggaon Branch State : Karnataka
Plot No.19, Pin : 581 201
T.M.No.2424/1-2-3
Near Old Bus Stand 68. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Shiggaon Lakmapur Branch
State : Karnataka Gram Panchayat Building
Pin : 581 205 Yedwad Village
Dist: Dharwad
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2897
State : Karnataka Post Kalledevaru
Pin : 581 206 Dist: Haveri
State : Karnataka
69. Syndicate Bank Pin : 581 106
Harobelavadi Branch
Gram Panchayat Building 77. Syndicate Bank
Harobelavadi Regional Office Shimoga
Dist: Dharwad First Floor,
State : Karnataka Sanman Regency Nehru Road
Pin : 581 201 Dist: Shivamogga
State : Karnataka
70. Syndicate Bank Pin : 577 201
Malasamudra Branch
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences Campus 78. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Gadag Siddeshwarnagar Branch
State : Karnataka Site No. 4/2005,
Pin : 582 103 Ward No.1
Holehonnur Road
71. Syndicate Bank Dist: Shivamogga
Alnavar Branch State : Karnataka
Shop No.04, Pin : 577 203
CTS No. 401/D
Renuka Complex 79. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad Agumbe Branch
State : Karnataka Nandagokul Building,
Pin : 581 103 Main Road
Thirthahalli Taluk
72. Syndicate Bank Dist: Shivamogga
Dharwad Tejaswinagar Branch State : Karnataka
14184/2C/RS No.62C Pin : 577 411
Plot No. 22A
Dist: Dharwad 80. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Sagar Branch
Pin : 580 001 SPM Road
Sagar
73. Syndicate Bank Dist: Shivamogga
Hedigonda Branch State : Karnataka
Gram Panchayat Building Pin : 577 401
Byadgi Taluk
Dist: Haveri 81. Syndicate Bank
State : Karnataka Sorab Branch
Pin : 581 110 Shubhodaya,
Main Road Cross
74. Syndicate Bank Sorab
Shiroor Park Hubli Branch Dist: Shivamogga
Chadda Building State : Karnataka
Opposite More Super Market Pin : 577 429
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka 82. Syndicate Bank
Pin : 580 031 Kumsi Branch
Padmavati Nilaya
75. Syndicate Bank B.H.Road
Retail Loan Centre Hubli Branch Dist: Shivamogga
Shanbhag Building, State : Karnataka
Unkal Cross Sai Nagar Road Pin : 577 423
Dist: Hubballi-Dharwad
State : Karnataka 83. Syndicate Bank
Pin : 580 031 Ameer Ahmed Circle Branch
B H Road AA Circle
76. Syndicate Bank Dist: Shivamogga
Kalledevaru Branch State : Karnataka
Gram Panchayat Building Pin : 577 201
2898 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
84. Syndicate Bank 92. Syndicate Bank
Gandhi Bazar Main Branch Kolkata Purbalok Branch
Gandhi Bazar Ward No.109,
Dist: Shivamogga Near Maruti
State : Karnataka Show Room
Pin : 577 201 434, Survey park
Dist: Kolkata
85. Syndicate Bank State : West Bengal
Shiralkoppa Branch Pin : 700 099
MN Pickle Industrial Building
Near Bus Stand 93. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Shivamogga St Xaviers University Branch
State : Karnataka St Xavier College Campus
Pin : 577 428 PS New Town
Rajarhat
86. Syndicate Bank Dist: Kolkata
Malatipur Branch State : West Bengal
Main Road Malatipur Pin : 700 156
Post Chaita
Dist: North 24 paragana 94. Syndicate Bank
State : West Bengal Nayabad Branch
Pin : 743 445 Ward No. 109, 1277
PS purba Jadavpur
87. Syndicate Bank Dist: Kolkata
Kalupur Branch State : West Bengal
Village Kalupur Pin : 700 099
P.S. Bongaon
Dist: North 24 paragana 95. Syndicate Bank
State : West Bengal Bainchi Branch
Pin : 743 235 Bainchi ALU Byabasayee
Kalyan Samiti
88. Syndicate Bank GT Road
RB Avenue Branch Dist: Hoogly
134, Rashbehari Avenue State : West Bengal
Deshpriya Park Crossing Pin : 712 134
Dist: Kolkata
State : West Bengal 96. Syndicate Bank
Pin : 700 029 Arambagh Branch
Ward No.5, Link Road
89. Syndicate Bank Near Spandan
Puratan Bongaon Branch Nursing Home
Viilage & Post Puratan Bongaon Dist: Kolkata
Dist: North 24 Paragana State : West Bengal
State : West Bengal Pin : 712 601
Pin : 743 235
97. Syndicate Bank
90. Syndicate Bank BDMI Narendrapur Branch
Shibpur Branch BD Memorial Institute
493/C/A, GT Road Main Road
Vivek Vihar Dist: Kolkata
Howrah State : West Bengal
Dist: Kolkata Pin : 743 000
State : West Bengal
Pin : 711 102 98. Syndicate Bank
Mid Corporate Kolkata Branch
91. Syndicate Bank NS Road
Rajarhat Branch Kolkata
Orchid Plaza Dist: Kolkata
Kathgola State : West Bengal
Dist: Rajarhat Pin : 700 001
State : West Bengal
Pin : 700 136
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2899
99. Syndicate Bank 107. Syndicate Bank
Training Centre Kolkata Fakot Branch
226 B Village & Post Agrakhal
RB Avenue New Agrakhal
Dist: Kolkata Dist: Tehri Garhwal
State : West Bengal State : Uttarakhand
Pin : 700 019 Pin : 249 175
100. Syndicate Bank 108. Syndicate Bank
Kempty Fall Branch Raiwala Branch
Village & Post Kempty Mohalla Prateet Nagar
Near Kemty Fall Raiwala
Dist: Tehri Garhwal Dist: Dehradun
State : Uttarakhand State : Uttarakhand
Pin : 248 179 Pin : 249 205
101. Syndicate Bank 109. Syndicate Bank
Hindolakhal Branch Laksar Branch
Devprayag Road Govardhan Road
Village & Post Hindolakhal Near Purkaji Bus Stand,
Dist: Tehri Garhwal Tehsil Tiraha
State : Uttarakhand Dist: Haridwar
Pin : 249 122 State : Uttarakhand
Pin : 247 663
102. Syndicate Bank
Peerumdara Branch 110. Syndicate Bank
Village & Post Peerumdara Bageshwar Branch
Dist: Nainital Hotel Ashish
State : Uttarakhand Tehsil Road Bageshwar
Pin : 244 715 Dist: Bageshwar
State : Uttarakhand
103. Syndicate Bank Pin : 263 642
Durgapur 2 Branch
Dineshpur Road 111. Syndicate Bank
Tehsil Gadarpur Khatima Branch
Dist: Udham Singh Nagar Opposite Tehsil Office
State : Uttarakhand Sitarganj Road
Pin : 263 160 Dist: Udhamsingh Nagar
State : Uttarakhand
104. Syndicate Bank Pin : 262 308
Nairana Branch
Village nairana 112. Syndicate Bank
Post Office Bhikki Vikasnagar Branch
Dist: Muzaffarnagar Main Market
State : Uttarapradesh Near OBC
Pin : 251 203 Dist: Dehradun
State : Uttarakhand
105. Syndicate Bank Pin : 248 142
Margoobpur Deedaheri Branch
Village & Post Margoobpur Deedaheri 113. Syndicate Bank
Tehsil Roorkee Tanakpur Branch
Dist: Haridwar Opposite Degree College
State : Uttarakhand Ward No. 9,
Pin : 247 667 Champavat Road
Dist: Champavat
106. Syndicate Bank State : Uttarakhand
EC Road Branch Pin : 262 309
Vansh Tower, 3 EC Road
Near DAV Chowk 114. Syndicate Bank
Dist: Dehradun Dharchula Dehat Branch
State : Uttarakhand Gram Pultari
Pin : 248 001 Tehsil Dharchula
2900 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Dist: Pithoragarh Dist: Guntur
State : Uttarakhand State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 262 545 Pin : 522 101
115. Syndicate Bank 121. Syndicate Bank
Saharanpur Raiwala Branch RMLC Vijayawada
Moti Mahal D.No. 40-13-15, Third Floor
Mandi Samiti Road, Raiwala Sri Ramachandra Complex
Dist: Saharanpur Dist: Vijayawada
State : Uttarapradesh State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 247 001 Pin : 520 010
116. Syndicate Bank 122. Syndicate Bank
Zonal Office Manipal Chodavaram Branch
Head Office Annex # 4-50, Main Road
Dist: Udupi Opp Post Office
State : Karnatak Dist: Krishna
Pin : 576 104 State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 521 139
117. Syndicate Bank
Chilkaluripet Branch 123. Syndicate Bank
Chirala Road Mail Branch
Modern Caffe Building Village & Post Mail
Dist: Guntur Dist: Meerut
State : Andhra Pradesh State : Uttarapradesh
Pin : 522 616 Pin : 250 222
118. Syndicate Bank 124. Syndicate Bank
Mangalagiri Branch Peeplikhera Branch
# 1-1344 Post Office Kharkhauda
Hospital Road Dist: Meerut
Dakshina Galigopuram Street State : Uttarapradesh
Dist: Guntur Pin : 245 206
State : Andhra Pradesh
Pin : 522 503 125. Syndicate Bank
Pithlokar Branch
119. Syndicate Bank Village & Post Pithlokar
Amaravati Branch Dist: Meerut
# 10-110, State : Uttarapradesh
Kacheri Centre Pin : 250 342
Main Road
Dist: Guntur 126. Syndicate Bank
State : Andhra Pradesh Regional Office Noida
Pin : 522 020 Noida Market
Noida Sector -16
120. Syndicate Bank Dist: Gautambuddanagar
Bapatla Branch State : Uttarapradesh
D.No. 4-2-32, Pin : 201 301
SNP Agraharam
GBC Road
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
2901
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2019
का.आका.आका.आका.आ....754754754754————कें (cid:9)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 (1987 में यथा
संशोिधत) के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में भारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेट बैंकट बैंकट बैंकट बैंक के सूचीब, कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को अधिसूचित
करती है, िजनके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक 5ान प्राप्त कर लिया है : —
| 8.सं. | बैंक का नाम | कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की संख्या |
| 1. | भारतीय स् टेट बैंक | 153 |
| क क क ु ल कु ल ु ल | 153153153153 |
[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हि.(अधि.)]
शैलेश कु मार सिह, संयुक्त निदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा िनयम 1976राजभाषा िनयम 1976राजभाषा िनयम 1976राजभाषा िनयम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिके नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिके नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिके नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों/सूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों/सूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों/सूचित किए जाने वाले कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की सूचीशाखाओं की सूचीशाखाओं की सूचीशाखाओं की सूची
1. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अरसीके रे शाखा
पवमाना ए पी एम सी यार्ड के सामने, बी एच रोड
अरिसके रे, हासन िजला 573 103
2. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अरसीके रे बजार , डाक पेटी सं. 1 गणपति पेंडाल रोड अरसीके रे, हासन िजला 573 103
3. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बी एच रोड अरसीके रे
डाक पेटी सं. 14 बी. एच. रोड हासन िजला
4. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाणावरा शाखा 40873
महावीर कांप्लेक्स, एन एच 206, के एस आर टी सी बस स्टैंड के सामने बाणावरा
5. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक बेलूर शाखा
अCिनी मैंशन मुख्य रोड,
बेलूर 573 115
6. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीरूर शाखा 40162
नं. 72 एन एच 206
बी एच रोड
बीरूर कडूर तालूक
चिGमगलूर कर्नाटक
7. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चागचगेरे शाखा 40482
ललनके रे पोस्ट गंडसी हैंड पोस्ट अरिसके रे तालूक
8. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चिGमगलूर शाखा 08732
यशोराम चेंबर्स
आर जी रोड,
चिGमगलूर 577 101
9. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दुद्दा शाखा 40907
संपिगे रोड दुद्दा शाखा
10. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गंडसी शाखा 40188
अरसीके रे- सी आर पOना रोड गंडसी अरसीके रे तालूक,
हासन िजला2902 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 11. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
19. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
Pलेबीडू शाखा 40904
कनक[ शाखा 40242
खाता सं. 42/1
सं. 16 573 144
राजानसिरियूर रोड हलेबीडु,
हासन िजला
बेलूर तालुक, हासन
20. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
12. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कनकपुरा 40427
होसमने एक्स्टेंशन चिGमगलूQ शाखा 40143
माकोनहल्ली पोस्ट मूडिगेरे
के एम रोड RSको कालनी
चिGमगलूQ जिला
2 स्टेज ज्योतिनगर पोस्ट
िचGमगलुQ
21. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एम जी सर्क ल तरिके रे
13. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एम जी सर्क ल, बी एच रोड, तरिके रे आई जी रोड शाखा चिGमगलूQ 16281
चिGमगलूQ जिला -577228
प्रथम मंजिल बी एम बवन,
तोगरीहन्कल सर्क ल,
22. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चिGमगलूQ
मल्लंदूQ रोड शाखा 41086
राजेCर कांप्लेक्स
14. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मल्लंदूर रोड चिGमगलूQ
जावगल शाखा 40874
पी एन काम्प्लेक्स माकX ट रोड,
23. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नया पुलिस स्टेशन के सामने
मूिडगेरे शाखा 40147
जावगल
डा.पे. सं. 10 स्टेट बैंक रोड
चिGमगलूQ
15. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयचामराजपुरा शाखा 40315
24. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अरसीके रे तालुक
मूिडगेरे एडीबी शाखा 03102
हासन िजला
के एम रोड मूिडगेरे,
चिGमगलूQ जिला 577 132
16. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
क्डूर शाखा
25. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डा.पे. स. 135
नेहरूनगर शाखा, बेलूर 41019
कडूर-मंगलूर रोड कडूर,
ल\मी टवर्स
कडूर
चिGमगलूर-हासन
मुख्य रोड नेहरूनगर
17. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बेलूर
के एम रोड क्डूर 40144
दत्तत्रीनगर,
26. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एन एच 206,
निडघ[ा शाखा 40325
बी एच रोड, कडूर
39/3 वी एस एस एन बिल्डिग बैरप्पनहल्ली चिGमगलूQ जिला - 577 548
निडघ[ा ]ाम, कडूर तालुक
18. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
27. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कलसा शाखा 17851
प[दूर शाखा 40439
कार मूिडगेरे,
बिल्लूर कडिदाल पोस्ट
चिGमगलूQ
प[दूर[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2903 28. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिगटगेरे शाखा 40173
टी बी रोड सिगटगेरे, कडूर तालुक, चिGमगलूर जिला 577 138
29. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टी एम सी रोड अ^मपुरा शाखा 40212 पी. बी. नं.1 अ^ंपुरा
तरीके रे तालुक चिGमगलूQ जिल्ला
30. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तरीके रे शाखा 11260
बी एच रोड,
(NH-206),
के ए डी कैं प, तरीके रे
चिGमगलूर जिला - 577 228
31. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टेंपल रोड बेलूर शाखा
नं.1600 _ी वाई. डी नंजेगौडा टेंपल रोड
32. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िबजै कािपकाड शाखा.
कासा रीन
िबजै-कावूर रोड, िबजै
मंगलूQ
33. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आरंबाडी शाखा
गुQप्रसाद कांप्लेक्स, कु डुरस्ते
आरंबाडी ]ाम एवं पोस्ट
34. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सुल्या शाखा _ीराम पेट, सुल्या डाक पेटी सं. 1 साई राम कांप्लेक्स सुल्या
35. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पुत्तूर शाखा
कडबा पुत्तूQ
शालोम टवर्स मुख्य रोड
पुत्तूQ
36. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पुत्तूQ कोर्ट रोड शाखा
प्रथम मंजिल गजानना टवर्स पुलिस aाटर्स के सामने
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला
37. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नरिमोगरू शाखा
एस ए कांप्लेक्स पुQषरक[े
नरिमोगरू ]ाम एवं पोस्ट
पुत्तूQ तालुक
38. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वेणूर शाखा
गार्डन dू कांप्लेक्स
बस अeा
वेणूर
39. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मूडबि(cid:9)ी मा]ान्थ कांप्लेक्स मुख्य रोड
मूडबि(cid:9)ी
40. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मूडबि(cid:9)ी शाखा
डाक पेटी सं. 4 मूडिब(cid:9)ी,
मंगलूQ तालुक
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला-. 574 227
41. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कै कं बा शाखा
सेरf कांप्लेक्स एन एच- 13 कै कं बा 42. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हरेकला शाखा 71039
हरेकला एलेयूरपडवु,
दरवाजा सं. 4/162A,वार्ड 3 येिलयूरपडवु ,हरेकला पोस्ट मंगलूQ, दक्षिण कन्नड जिला
43. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बोिलयार शाखा
मनदीप कांप्लेक्स, सं..3-47-06 बोलियाQ डाक,2904 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] दक्षिण कन्नड जिला
को[ार चौकि शाखा
कर्नाटक- 574153
रेब नेस्ट, अशोकनगर पोस्ट
44. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंगलूQ
मंजनाडी आसैगोली शाखा
52. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
1-4-5 जी आर वी अकX ड
मंगलूQ सिटि शाखा
आसैगोली पोस्ट
पुष्पांजली बिल्डिग कू लूर – फे री रोड अलके , दक्षिण कन्नड जिला
मंगलूQ
53. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
45. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जी एच एस रोड मंगलूQ शाखा
बीरी शाखा , 3-9/5/3, तल मंिजल,
डाक पेटी सं. 93
नेत्रावती बिल्डिग,
जनता बजार बिल्डंग
मडूर मुख्य रोड, बीरी (V) मंगलूQ,
मंगलूQ
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला - 575022
54. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
46. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मल्लिक[ा शाखा
बाला शाखा
डाक पेटी सं.: 512
ललित टवर्स कै कं बा कटिपल
जुगल टवर्स, मल्लिक[ा,
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला
मंगलूQ 575 002
47. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एन आर आई शाखा,
55. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डूपल तल मंिजल,
मंगलादेवी शाखा
के एस आर टी सी,
मंगलादेवी टेंपल रोड
बिजै चर्च रोड,
मंगलूQ
िबजै, मंगलूQ - 575 004.
48. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
56. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सूरत्कल शाखा
कं कनाडी
एन आई टी के कं पस _ीनिवासनगर पी.ओ
डाक पेटी सं.: 528
दक्षिण कन्नड - 575 025
फादर मुल्लर रोड
कं कनाडी
49. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंगलूQ
सूरत्कल सिटी शाखा
सतीश कांप्लेक्स एन एच 66
57. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोविददास कालेज के सामने,
पी बी बी शाखा
सूरत्कल सिटी
8िस्टल आर्क बलम[ा रोड
दक्षिण कन्नड
मंगलूQ 575 003
50. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
58. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई सेंटर
अत्तावरा
के नरा कालेज के सामने
_ी विनायक कृ पा बिल्डिग
एम जी रोड कोिडयालबैल
क[े के सामने, न जी रोड, अत्तावरा मंगलूQ -575004
मंगलूQ 575 001
51. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
59. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2905 क(िcid:9) शिवभाग शाखा
पृथ्वी शापिग माल प्रथम मंजिल
डाक घर के पास,
के नरा क्लब के सामने
पुराना बस स्टांड रोड
मंगलूQ
उप्पिनन्गडी दक्षिण कन्नड - 571241
68. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
60. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ऐवरनाडु शाखा
क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय-5
स्टेट बैंक ऑफ मैसूर ऐवरनाडु
होसमने एक्स्टेंशन
]ाम पंचायत सेवा कें (cid:9) बी
चिGमगलूQ
ऐवरनाडु
61. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
69. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बेलूQ शाखा
िशराडी शाखा
अCिनी मान्शन, मुख्य रोड
दरवाज़ा सं.2-26(1)
बेलूर 573 115
एस सं.7/1B(P2),
एन एच 48
62. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कु नत कांप्लेक्स,
टेंपल रोड शाखा, बेलूर
शिराडी पुत्तूर तालुक
नं.1600 _ी वाई डी नन्जेगौडा
दक्षिण कन्नड - 574229
टेंपल रोड, बेलूर
70. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बेल्तंगडी शाखा
63. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डाक पेटी सं.. 1,
कडबा पुत्तूQ
_ीक्षेत्र कांपेल्क्स,
पुत्तूQ दक्षिण कन्नड
बेल्तंगडी,
कडबा िजला,
दक्षिण कन्नड - 574 214
कर्नाटक- 574221
64. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
71. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िवठला शाखा
मंगलूQ शाखा
2-387(24) रीहा और पार्क लैन कांप्लेक्स
पोर्ट रोड, मंगलूQ - 575 001
जैन बसदी के सानमे
72. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िवठला
के एस राव रोड शाखा,
मंगलूQ
65. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दक्षिण कन्नड - 575003
बी.सी.रोड शाखा
जोडुमार्ग डाक
73. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कार्क ला शाखा
दक्षिण कन्नड - 574 219
नं. 270, वार्ड नं.2,तल मंिजल
होटेल प्रकाश कांप्लेक्स, अनंतशयना 66. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कार्क ला – 574104
सुब्रमnया शाखा
_ीनिके तना बिडिग
74. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कार स्ट्रीट
बैलूQ शाखा, दरवाजा सं. 2/68, डॉ.
सुब्रमnया
अरूर क्लिनिक एवं नrसग होम,
बैलूर के पास
67. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कार्क ला तालुक, उडुिप – 574102 उप्पिनंगडी शाखा
75. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक2906 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] एफ एम सी रोड,
िवराजपेट शाखा
िवराजपेट
76. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मिणपाल शाखा
मधुवन सेरै ]sड,
स्tिति बिलिडंग कांप्लेक्स
टाईगर सर्क ल, मिणपाल
77. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मल्पे शाखा
शिवuया कांप्लेक्स
मुख्य रोड, मल्पे
उडुिप - 576118
78. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय-3, सीताल\मी कांप्लेक्स, _ीवीडु उडुिप
79. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नेताजी 8ास रोड शाखा, उडुिप पीबी 76 रेहमान कमvशयल कांप्लेक्स न्यू सvवस बस स्टांड,
नेताजी 8ास रोड
उडुिप
80. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शिर्वा शाखा
नवीन आकX ड बस स्टांड के पास शिर्वा बेलमन मुख्य रोड शिर्वा उडुपी - 574116
81. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पडुबि(cid:9)ी शाखा
डा.पे. 1 _ी महाल\मी कांप्लेक्स, पडुबि(cid:9)ी-574111
उडुिप िजला – 574111
82. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
क(िcid:9) शिवभाग शाखा
दरवाजा सं..15-13-690/2
के नरा क्लब के सामने,
क(िcid:9) शिवभाग, मंगलूQ
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला –––– 575002
83. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
किन्निगोली शाखा
वwा कांप्लेक्स
मुख्य रोद, किन्निगोली,
दक्षिण कन्नड - 574 150
84. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कार्नाड शाखा
पु ंजा बिल्डिग, मुल्कि,
कार्नाड
दक्षिण कन्नड जिला - 574 154
85. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मेन्नबेOटु शाखा
दरवाजा सं.12-34(1),
दुर्गाप्रसाद बिल्डिग
2 वां 8ास,
मेन्नबेOटु विलेज किन्निगोली मंगलूQ, दक्षिण कन्नड - 574150
86. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बजपे शाखा
ललित टवर्स, कै कं बा कटिपाल दक्षिण कन्नड
87. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पावंजे शाखा
_ी 5ानशक्ति सुब्रमnयस्वामी मंदिर काम्प्लेक्स पावंजे, हलेयंगडी डाक , दक्षिण कन्नड,
कर्नाटक – 574146
88. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पणंबुQ शाखा
पोर्ट अस्पताल कांप्लेक्स
पणंबूQ
मंगलूQ 575 010
89. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
छोटा मंगलूQ उल्लाल शाखा[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2907 उलिताय प्रसाद बिल्डिग,
उल्लाल
भारती हाईस्कू ल के पास
मंगलूQ
90. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक,
पर्क ला शाखा
भूधरा टवर्स मुख्य रोड
पर्क ला, उडुिप - 576107
91. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तोGोOटु शाखा
तल मंजिल हाईलैंड कांप्लेक्स एन एच 17
तोGो[ि
दक्षिण कन्नड – 575002
92. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बजल शाखा
होली स्पिरिट चर्च परिसर,
बजल, मंगलूQ,
दक्षिण कन्नड - 575 007
93. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कावूQ शाखा
शाप सं.-5,भंडारी पेिविलयन
सप्तगिरि कावूQ जंक्शन
मंगलूQ, दक्षिण कन्नड – 575015
94. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
किल्पाडी शाखा
दरवाज़ा .2-212(4),(5),(6),
लिगपेयGड
के एस राव नगर,
जंक्षन किल्पाडी ]ाम, मूल्किपोस्ट,
मंगलूर, दक्षिण कन्नड - 574154
95. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
महावीर सर्क ल शाखा
# 2-83 भाग्यवती कांप्लेक्स,
कापिटानियो स्कू ल के सामने मंगलूQ
96. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंगल गंगोत्री शाखा, कोणाजे
मंगलूQ यूनिवvसटि कै पस
मंगल गंगोत्री मंगलूQ
97. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मडिके री मुख्य शाखा
डाक पेटी सं: 1 कालेज रोड
मिडके री
कोडगु - 571 201
98. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मिडके री टाऊन शाखा
संगीता कांप्लेक्स
जी टी रोड के एस आर टी सी िडपाट के सामने
मिडके री, कोडगु
99. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुर्नाडु शाखा
डाक पेटी सं. 16 मुख्य रोड
मुर्नाड. - 571 252
100. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोणीके प्पा शाखा
नं. 204(2),
ब्लाक सं. 3 मुख्य रोड,
गोणीकोप्पल
कोडगु िजला
101. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पोन्नम्पेट शाखा
डाक पेटी सं. 5 सी पी कु शालप्पा रोड
पोन्नम्पेट पोस्ट
102. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िवराजपेट शाखा
तालुक आफिस रोड
िवराजपेट
कोडगु - 571 218
103. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टी.से[िगेरे शाखा
सरकारी स्कू ल के सामने
Rडिके री कु [ा मुख्य रोड
104. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
स एम ई शाखा
कात्यायनी महामाया कांप्लेक्स
पी वी एस कलाकु ं ज के सामने,
कोिडयालबैल , मंगलूQ
105. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
फलनीर रोड शाखा2908 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] हंपनक[ा
डा.पे. सं.19 न्यू मिलागिस मैनशन हंपनक[ा, मंगलूQ
106. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िवशेषीकृ त एन आर आई शाखा, मंगलूQ
2-12/6 हिल ]ूव चिलिबी
कू लूर-फे री रोड, प्रथम मंजिल मंगलूQ
107. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस बी आई इन टच लाईट, मंगलूQ अल हेलेन अपाटर्मेंटस.
बिजै मुख्य रोड बिजै
मंगलूQ- 575004
108. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर ए सी पी सी, मंगलूQ
एस्सेल टवर्स. 3र{ मंिजल, बी 5212 बंOस हास्टल सर्क ल
मंगलूQ 575 003
109. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय-1, मंगलूQ एस्सेल टवर्स,
2वां मंिजल, बी 5212
बंOस हास्टेल सर्क ल
मंगलूQ 575 003
110. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर्य समाज रोड शाखा
बल्म|ा काम्प्लेक्स
बल्म|ा
मंगलूQ 575 003
111. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लालबाग शाखा
डाक पेटी सं. 729,
प्रथम मंजिल _ीकृ ष्णा कांप्लेक्स एम जी रोड, लालबाग,
मंगलूQ 575 003
112. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक,
प्रशासनिक कार्यालय -1, नेटवर्क -1, पहली मंिजल, मैसूर बैंक स}कल, कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग,
बेंगलूर – 560009
113. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ,
क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय -1, प्रशासनिक कार्यालय -1,
िनचली मंिजल,
मैसूर बैंक स}कल,
कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग ,
बेंगलूर – 560009
114. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक , क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय -2, प्रशा. कार्य. -1, दूसरी मंिजल, मैसूर बैंक स}कल, कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग , बेंगलूर – 560009
115. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ,
क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय -3, प्रशा. कार्य. -1, दूसरी मंिजल, मैसूर बैंक स}कल,
कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग ,
बेंगलूर – 560009
116. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक , क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय -4, प्रशा. कार्य. -1, तीसरी मंिजल, मैसूर बैंक स}कल,
कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग ,
बेंगलूर – 560009
117. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक , क्षेत्रीय dवसाय कार्यालय-5, प्रशा. कार्य. -1, तीसरी मंिजल, मैसूर बैंक स}कल, कै म्पेगौड़ा मार्ग, बेंगलूर – 560009
118. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शंकरपुरा शाखा ,
रंगराव मार्ग शंकरपुरम ,
बेंगलूर – 560004
119. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2909 कोथन्नूर बी के सर्क ल शाखा, सं-6, कोथनूर डिन्ने मुख्य मार्ग, जे पी नगर 8वां फे स,
बेंगलूर- 560076
120. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जयनगर 7वां ब्लॉक शाखा, सं 12, ए 12 , 2 मैन,
जयनगर 7वां ब्लॉक
बेंगलूर -560070
121. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एनआर कालोनी शाखा,
39/1, सन्निधि मार्ग,
बेंगलूर- 560004
122. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इंटच जयनगर शाखा, 7वां बी मुख्य मार्ग,
जयनगर 4था ब्लॉक, (प(िcid:128)म) बेंगलूर -560011
123. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बैरसन्(cid:9)ा शाखा,
99/37 ,बैरसं(cid:9)ा मुख्य मार्ग , पहला ब्लॉक जयनगर पूर्व, बेंगलूर -560011
124. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पु[ेनहल्ली शाखा ,
सं -736 ,60फीट मार्ग , जेपी नगर, 8वां फे स ,
बेंगलूर- 560078
125. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
dालिकावल शाखा,
अंतरिक्ष भवन कैं पस,
आरएमवी 2रा स्टेज,
बेंगलूर – 560094
126. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सदािशवनगर शाखा ,
7/ए "वाग्देवी मने",
2 मुख्य मार्ग, dालिकावल, बेंगलूर – 560003
127. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पीबीबी मल्लेCरम शाखा ,
49, चाQ एंक्लेव, 17रा 8ास, 10वां ए मुख्य , मल्लेCरम,
बेंगलूर- 560055
128. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पीबीबी पैलेस आर्चड शाखा ,
382.30/1,13वां 8ास ,
उप्पर पैलेस आर्चर्ड़स, सदािशवनगर , बेंगलूर- 560080
129. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक,
रेस कोर्स शाखा ,29/4 रेसकोर्स मार्ग , dापार कें (cid:9) ,
बेंगलूर- 560001
130. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आरएमवी एक्सटेंशन शाखा,
अंतरिक्ष भवन कैं पस,
आरएमवी 2रा स्टेज,
बेंगलूर-560094
131. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोकु ल एक्सटेंशन शाखा,
361/1089, पहला स्टेज ,2रा फे स, एचएमटी मुख्य मार्ग,
बेंगलूर – 560054
132. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जालाहल्ली (पूर्व ) शाखा,
एयर फोर्स स्टेशन,
जालाहल्ली पूर्व,
बेंगलूर- 560014
133. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जालाहल्ली (प(िcid:128)म ) शाखा,
हॉस्पिटल टाउन (प(िcid:128)म) तृप्ति कांलेक्स, बेंगलूर-560015
134. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीईएल शाखा,
भारत इलेक्ट्रानिक लिमिटेड,
जालाहल्ली,
बेंगलूर- 5600132910 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 135. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
महाल\मीपुरम शाखा,
सं 201 60 फीट मुख्य मार्ग इं(cid:9)स्ट्रियल कामगार लेआउट, शंकर नगर,
बेंगलूर(शहरी )-560086
136. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बैरेCर नगर शाखा,
सं-485, 8वां मुख्य ,
3रा स्टेज ,4था ब्लॉक
बेंगलूर
137. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राजाजीनगर 2रा ब्लाक शाखा, सं 2040 ,19वां मुख्य मार्ग , राजाजीनगर 2रा ब्लॉक विस्तारण, बेंगलूर- 560010
138. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुद्देनेपल्या विCेCरuया शाखा, अक्षय साई लेक dू 60फीट, बेंगलूर -560091
139. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
माल्लथहल्ली शाखा,
"सौम्य" सं 94 , 80फीट मार्ग, आईटीआई लेआउट,
बेंगलूर -560056
140. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िवजयनगर शाखा,
सं. 2 ( पुराना नं.125), 5वां मुख्य, सीएचबीसीएस,
पहला लेआउट, िवजयनगर, बेंगलूर -560040
141. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चं(cid:9)ा लेआउट शाखा,
1235, 8वां 8ास, प्रथम स्टेज, चं(cid:9)ा लेआउट,
बेंगलूर – 560040
142. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मागड़ी रोड शाखा,
मनुइतेज टावर्स मगड़ी मुख्य मार्ग, बेंगलूर- 560079
143. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मलागला रोड शाखा,
सं. 2, गंगम्मा गाडXन,
मलागला मुख्य मार्ग,
बेंगलूर-560091
144. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नागरभावी 2रा स्टेज शाखा,
बीडीए साइट सं 188,
80 फीट (cid:131)रग रोड,
2रा ब्लॉक,
बेंगलूर- 560072
145. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पापरेeी पाल्या शाखा,
सं-353,चन्दन कॉम्प्लेक्स ,
नागरभावी 2रा स्टेज ,
बेंगलूर -560072
146. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इसरो लेआउट शाखा,
694 इसरो लेआउट पहली मंिजल, बेंगलूर-560078
147. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बीईएमएल शाखा,
सं 251 हालेगे(cid:132)दराहल्ली मार्ग, 60 फीट रास्ता,
राजराजेCरीनगर,
बेंगलूर -560098
148. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चन्नासां(cid:9)ा शाखा,
सं 147,
जवाहरलाल नेहरू मुख्य मार्ग चन्नासं(cid:9)ा, राजराजेCरी नगर,
बेंगलूर – 560098[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2911 149. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बनगिरिनगर शाखा,
देवगिरि देवस्थान,
30वां मुख्य,
बेंगलूर -560070
150. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
_ीनगर (बेंगलुQ) शाखा,
# 1479, शुभांगी एंक्लेव 17वां मुख्य,
मुनेCरा ब्लॉक, अवलाहल्ली,
बेंगलूर- 560026
151. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
152. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामन_ी आर्च बनशंकरी 3रा स्टेज शाखा
पीबी सं-7079,
21वां मुख्य,
बनशंकरी 3रा स्टेज,
बेंगलूर -560070
153. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
स्थानीय प्रधान कार्यालय
# 65,
सेंट माक्र्स रोड,
बेंगलूर – 560001
प(cid:133)नाभनगर शाखा, 375 ,
बेंगलूर -560070
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2019
S.O. 754.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987),the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/ Branches of State Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:—
| S erial No. | Name of the Bank | Number of Offices/ Branches |
| 1. | State Bank of India | 153 |
| Total | 153 |
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
List of Branches / Offices to be notified under rule 10(4) of Official Language Rules 1976
1. STATE BANK OF INDIA ARSIKERE BRANCH .07912 PAVAMAANA.,, OPP. APMC YARD, B.H.ROAD ARSIKERE, HASSAN DIST. 573 103
2. STATE BANK OF INDIA ARSIKERE BAZAAR40542 PB NO 1 GANAPATHI PENDAL ROAD ARSIKERE HASSAN DIST. 573 103
3. STATE BANK OF INDIA B H ROAD ARSIKERE PB NO 14 B. H ROAD HASSAN DIST
4. STATE BANK OF INDIA BANAVARA BRANCH MAHAVEER COMPLEX, NH 206 OPP KSRTC BUS STAND BANAVARA
5. STATE BANK OF INDIA BELUR BRANCH ASHWINI MANSON MAIN ROAD, BELUR 573 115
6. STATE BANK OF INDIA BIRUR BRANCH NO. 72 NH 206 B H ROAD BIRUR KADUR TQ CHIKMAGALUR
7. STATE BANK OF INDIA CHAGACHAGERE BRANCH LALANKERE POST GANDSI HAND PO ARSIKERE TALUK
8. STATE BANK OF INDIA CHICKMAGALUR BRANCH YASHORAM CHAMBERS R.G. ROAD, CHICKMAGALUR 577 101
9. STATE BANK OF INDIA DUDDA BRANCH2912 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] SAMPIGE ROAD DUDDA , HASSAN - 573118
10. STATE BANK OF INDIA GANDASI BRANCH ARSIKERE-C R PATNA ROAD GANDASI VILLAGE ARSIKERE TALUK HASSAN
11. STATE BANK OF INDIA HALEBEEDU BRANCH KHATHA NO 42/1 RAJANASIRIYUR ROAD HALEBEEDU, BELUR TALUK HASSAN
12. STATE BANK OF INDIA HOSAMANE EXT CHICKMAGALUR BRANCH
K. M. ROAD, HUDCO COLONY I STAGE, JYOTHINAGAR POST CHIKMAGALUR
13. STATE BANK OF INDIA I G ROAD BRANCH CHIKMAGALUR I FLOOR, BM BUILDING
TOGARIHANKAL CIRCLE CHIKMAGALUR
14. STATE BANK OF INDIA JAVAGAL BRANCH P N COMPLEX MARKET ROAD OPP NEW POLICE STATION JAVAGAL
15. STATE BANK OF INDIA JAYACHAMARAJAPURA BRANCH ARSIKERE TALUK HASSAN
16. STATE BANK OF INDIA KADUR BRANCH PB NO.1 NO 135 KADUR-MANGALORE ROAD
KADUR
17. STATE BANK OF INDIA K M ROAD KADUR DATTATRI NAGAR, NH 206, B H ROAD, KADUR CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577 548
18. STATE BANK OF INDIA KALASA BRANCH CAR MUDIGERE, CHIKMAGALURU
19. STATE BANK OF INDIA KANAKATTE BRANCH 40242
NO. 16 573 144 HASSAN
20. STATE BANK OF INDIA KANNAPURA40427 MAKONAHALLY POST MUDIGERE TALUK
CHICKMAGALUR
21. STATE BANK OF INDIA M G CIRCLE TARIKERE SBI M G CIRCLE, B H ROAD, TARIKERE CHIKMAGALUR - 577228
22. STATE BANK OF INDIA MALLANDUR ROAD BRANCH RAJESHWAR COMPLEX MALLANDUR ROAD CHIKMAGALUR
23. STATE BANK OF INDIA MUDIGERE BRANCH PB NO 10 STATE BANK ROAD CHICKMAGALUR DIST
24. STATE BANK OF INDIA MUDIGERE ADB BRANCH K.M.ROAD MUDIGERE, CHICKMAGALUR - 577 132
25. STATE BANK OF INDIA NEHRUNAGAR BRANCH, BELUR LAKSMI TOWERS, CHICKMAGALUR-HASSAN MAIN ROAD,
NEHRU NAGAR,
HASSAN
26. STATE BANK OF INDIA NIDAGHATTA BRANCH 39/3 VSSSN BLDG BYRAPPANAHALLI NIDAGHATTA VILLAGE KADUR TALUK
27. STATE BANK OF INDIA PATTADUR BRANCH BILLUR KADIDAL POST PATTADUR
28. STATE BANK OF INDIA SINGATAGERE BRANCH T B ROAD SINGATAGERE KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGLAUR - 577 138
29. STATE BANK OF INDIA T M C ROAD AJJAMPURA BRANCH PB NO.1 T.M.C.ROAD AJJAMPURA TARIKERE TQ CHICKMAGALUR[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2913 30. STATE BANK OF INDIA TARIKERE BRANCH 11260 B H ROAD, (NH-206), KAD CAMP, TARIKERE CHIKMAGALUR 577 228
31. STATE BANK OF INDIA TEMPLE ROAD BELUR BRANCH NO.1600 SRI Y D NANJE GOWDA TEMPLE ROAD BELUR
32. STATE BANK OF INDIA BEJAI KAPIKAD BRANCH. CASA RHEAN BEJAI-KAVOOR ROAD, BEJAI MANGALORE
33. STATE BANK OF INDIA ARAMBODY BRANCH GURUPRASAD
COMPLEX KUDURASTHE
ARAMBODY VILL AND POST
34. STATE BANK OF INDIA SULLIA BRANCH SRIRAM PET SULLIA PB NO 1 SAI RAM COMPLEX SRIRAMPET SULLIA
35. STATE BANK OF INDIA PUTTUR BRANCH KADABA PUTTUR SHALOM TOWERS MAIN ROAD PUTTUR
36. STATE BANK OF INDIA PUTTUR COURT ROAD BRANCH FIRST FLOOR GAJANANA TOWERS, OPP POLICE QTRS DAKSHINA KANNADA DIST
37. STATE BANK OF INDIA NARIMOGARU BRANCH S A COMPLEX PURUSHARAKATTE NARIMOGARU VILLAGE & POST PUTTUR TQ
38. STATE BANK OF INDIA VENUR BRANCH GARDEN VIEW COMPLEX BUS STAND VENUR
39. STATE BANK OF INDIA MOODBIDRI MAGRANT COMPLEX BRANCH
MAIN ROAD MOODABIDRI
40. STATE BANK OF INDIA MOODBIDRI BRANCH PB NO 4 MOODBIDRI, MANGALORE TQ. D.K. DIST. 574 227
41. STATE BANK OF INDIA KAIKAMBA BRANCH SERRAO COMPLEX N H 13 KAIKAMBA
42. STATE BANK OF INDIA HARIKALA BRANCH HAREKALA ELIYARPADAVU DOOR 4/162A,WARD 3 ELIYARPADAVU,HAREKALA POST MANGALORE,D.K DISTRICT
43. STATE BANK OF INDIA BOLIYAR BRANCH AMAR DEEP COMPLEX,
NO.3-47-06 BOLIYARU POST,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574153
44. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANJANADY ASSAIGOLI BRANCH 1-4-5G R V ARCADE ASSAIGOLI POST DAKSHINA KANNADA
45. STATE BANK OF INDIA BEERI BRANCH 3-9/5/3, GROUND FLOOR NETHRAVATHI BLDNG,
MADOOR MAIN RD
BEERI (V) MANGALORE - 575022
46. STATE BANK OF INDIA BALA BRANCH LALITH TOWERS KAIKAMBA KATIPAL D.K. DIST
47. STATE BANK OF INDIA NRI BRANCH MANGALORE DUPLE, GROUND FLOOR KSTRC-BEJAI CHURCH ROAD, BEJAI, MANGALORE 575 004.
48. STATE BANK OF INDIA SURATKAL N.I.T.K.CAMPUS SRINIVASANAGAR P.O. DAKSHINA KANNADA DIST. 575 025
49. STATE BANK OF INDIA SURATKAL CITY1 SATHISH COMPLEX, N H 66 OPP GOVINDADAS COLLEGE SURATHKAL CITY D K DISTRICT2914 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 50. STATE BANK OF INDIA SME CENTRE- OPP.CANARA COLLEGE, M.G.ROAD, KODIALBAIL MANGALORE-575004
51. STATE BANK OF INDIA KOTTARA CHOWKI BRANCH REB NEST, ASHOK NAGAR POST MANGALORE
52. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALORE CITY BRANCH PUSHPANJALI BUILDING KULOOR FERRY ROAD
ALAKE, MANGALORE
53. STATE BANK OF INDIA G H S ROAD MANGALORE BRANCH PB NO 93 JANATHA BAZAR BUILDIN G H S ROAD MANGALORE
54. STATE BANK OF INDIA MALLIKATA BRANCH PB NO: 512 JUGUL TOWERS
MALLIKATTA, MANGALORE 575 002 55. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALADEVI MANGALADEVI TEMPLE ROAD MANGALORE
56. STATE BANK OF INDIA KANKANADY P.B. NO: 528 FR. MULLERS ROAD, KANKANADY MANGALORE
57. STATE BANK OF INDIA PBB BRANCH CRYSTAL ARC BALMATTA ROAD MANGALORE 575 003
58. STATE BANK OF INDIA ATTAVARA SHRI VINAYAK KRUPA BUILDING OPPOSITE KATTE, N.G.ROAD, ATTAVARA MANGALORE 575 001
59. STATE BANK OF INDIA KADRI SHIVABAGH BRANCH OPP: KANARA CLUB MANGALORE
60. STATE BANK OF INDIA REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-5 HOSAMANE EXTENSION CHICKMAGALUR
61. STATE BANK OF INDIA BELUR BRANCH ASHWINI MANSON, MAIN ROAD, BELUR 573 115
62. STATE BANK OF INDIA TEMPLE ROAD BELUR BRANCH TEMPLE ROAD BELUR NO.1600 SRI Y D NANJE GOWDA TEMPLE ROAD
63. STATE BANK OF INDIA KADABA PUTTUR PUTTUR DAKSHINA KANNADA TALUK , DISTRIC KADABA
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574221
64. STATE BANK OF INDIA VITTAL BRANCH 2-387(24) REEHA & PARKLINE COMPLEX OPP: JAIN BASADI VITTAL
65. STATE BANK OF INDIA B.C.ROAD BRANCH JODUMARGA P.O SOUTH KANARA 574 219
66. STATE BANK OF INDIA SUBRAMANYA BRANCH SRINIKETANA BUILDING CAR STREET SUBRAMANYA
67. STATE BANK OF INDIA UPPINANGADY BRANCH PRITHVI SHOPPING MALL, 1ST FLOOR
NEAR POST OFFICEM
OLD BUS-STAND ROAD UPPINANGADY,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 571241
68. STATE BANK OF INDIA IVARANADU BRANCH STATE BANK OF MYSORE IVARNADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH SEVA KENDRA B IVARNADU
69. STATE BANK OF INDIA SHIRADI BRANCH DOOR NO.2-26(1)S.NO.7/1B(P2), NH48 KUNNATH COMPLEX, SHIRADI, PUTTUR TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574229
70. STATE BANK OF INDIA BELTHANGADY BRANCH PB NO. 1 SREE KSHETRA COMPLEX
BELTHANGADY
SOUTH KANARA - 574 214[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2915 71. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALORE BRANCH PORT ROAD, MANGALORE 575 001
72. STATE BANK OF INDIA KSR ROAD BRANCH MANGALORE
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575003
73. STATE BANK OF INDIA KARKALA NO. 270,
WARD NO.2,
GROUND FLOOR HOTEL PRAKASH COMPLEX ANANTHASHAYANA, KARKALA – 574104
74. STATE BANK OF INDIA BAILUR DOOR NO. 2/68, NEAR DR.AROOR CLINIC &
NURSING HOME, BAILUR KARKALA TALUK,
UDUPI - 574102
75. STATE BANK OF INDIA FMC ROAD VIRAJPET I FLOOR CAUVERY COMPLEX F M C ROAD VIRAJPET
76. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANIPAL MADHUVAN SERAI, GROUND-4426 FLOOR NEAR SMRITHI BHAVAN, TIGER CIRCLE, MANIPAL
77. STATE BANK OF INDIA MALPE SHIVAYYA COMPLEX
MAIN ROAD, MALPE UDUPI - 576118
78. STATE BANK OF INDIA RBO-3 UDUPI SEETHALAXMI C0MPLEX, SHIRIBEEDU UDUPI
79. STATE BANK OF INDIA NETAJI CROSS ROAD BRANCH, UDUPI PB 76 REHMAN COMMERCIAL COMP NEW SERVICE BUS STAND NETAJI CROSS ROAD, UDUPI
80. STATE BANK OF INDIA SHIRVA BRANCH
NAVEEN ARCADE, NEAR BUS STAND
SHIRVA BELMAN MAIN ROAD SHIRVA, UDUPI TALUK,
UDUPI - 574116
81. STATE BANK OF INDIA PADUBIDRI BRANCH PB NO1 SRI MAHALAKSHMI COMPLEX,PADUBIDRI UDUPI - 574111
82. STATE BANK OF INDIA KADRI SHIVABAGH BRANCH D. NO.15-13-690/2
OPP.: KANARA CLUB,
KADRI - SHIVABAGH
MANGALORE - 575002
83. STATE BANK OF INDIA KINNIGOLI BRANCH VAJRA COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, KINNIGOLI, DAKSHINA KANNADA 574 150
84. STATE BANK OF INDIA KARNAD BRANCH PUNJA BUILDING MULKI, KARNAD DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 154 85. STATE BANK OF INDIA MENNABETTU BRANCH DOOR NO.12-34(1), DURGAPRASAD BUILDING RAM NAGAR 2ND CROSS, MENNABETTU VILLAGE
KINNIGOLI, MANGALURU, DAKSHIN KANNADA - 574150
86. STATE BANK OF INDIA BAJPE BRANCH LALITH TOWERS KAIKAMBA KATIPAL DAKSHIN KANNADA
87. STATE BANK OF INDIA PAVANJE BRANCH SRI JNANASHAKTHI
SUBRAHMANYASWAMI TEMPL COMPLEX PAVANJE,
HALEYANGADI POST PAVANJE, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574146
88. STATE BANK OF INDIA PANAMBUR BRANCH PORT HOSPITAL COMPLEX PANAMBUR MANGALORE 575 010
89. STATE BANK OF INDIA2916 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] CHOTA MANGALURU, ULLALA BRANCH ULITAYA PRASAD BUILDING , ULLAL NEAR BHARATI HIGH SCHOOL MANGALORE
90. STATE BANK OF INDIA PARKALA BRANCH BHOODARA TOWER
MAIN ROAD PARKALA,
UDUPI - 576107
91. STATE BANK OF INDIA THOKKOTTU BRANCH GROUND FLOOR
HIGH LAND COMPLES , NH 17 THOKKOTTU,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575002
92. STATE BANK OF INDIA BAJAL BRANCH HOLY SPIRIT CHURCH PREMISES BAJAL MANGALORE - 575 007
93. STATE BANK OF INDIA KAVOOR BRANCH SHOP NO G-5, BHANDARY PAVILLION OPP: SAPTHAGIRI,
KAVOOR JUNCTION MANGALORE,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575015
94. STATE BANK OF INDIA KILPADY BRANCH DOOR NO.2-212(4),(5),(6), LINGAPAY YAKAD
NEAR KS RAO NAGAR JN,
KILPADY VILLAGE, MULKI POST,
DAKSHIN KANNADA - 574154
95. STATE BANK OF INDIA MAHAVEER CIRCLE BRANCH # 2-83 BHAGAVATHI COMPLEX OPPOSITE CAPITANIO SCHOOL KANKANADY, DAKSHIN KANNADA
96. STATE BANK OF INDIA MANGALA GANGOTRI BRANCH, KONAJE,
MANGALORE UNIV.CAMPUS
MANGALA GANGOTHRI MANGALORE
97. STATE BANK OF INDIA MADIKERI MAIN BRANCH PB NO: 1 COLLEGE ROAD
MADIKERI KODAGU - 571 201
98. STATE BANK OF INDIA MADIKERI TOWN BRANCH SANGEETHA COMPLEX G T ROAD OPP KSRTC DEPOT MADIKERI KODAGU
99. STATE BANK OF INDIA MURNADU BRANCH PB NO. 16 MAIN ROAD, MURNAD. - 571 252
100. STATE BANK OF INDIA GONIKOPPA BRANCH NO.204(2), BLOCK NO 3 MAIN ROAD GONIKOPPAL KODAGU
101. STATE BANK OF INDIA PONNAMPET BRANCH PB NO 5 C P KUSHALAPPA ROAD PONNAMPET POST
102. STATE BANK OF INDIA VIRAJPET BRANCH TALUK OFFICE ROAD VIRAJPET, KODAGU - 571 218
103. STATE BANK OF INDIA T. SETTIGERE BRANCH OPP. GOVT. SCHOOL
HUDIKERI KUTTA MAIN ROAD
104. STATE BANK OF INDIA SME BRANCH KATYAYANI MAHAMAYA COMPLEX OPP P V S KALAKUNJ, KODIALBAIL MANGALORE
105. STATE BANK OF INDIA FALNIR ROAD BRANCH HAMPANAKATTA P.B.NO.19 NEW MILAGERES MANSION HAMPANKATTA MANGALURU
106. STATE BANK OF INDIA SPECIALISED NRI BRANCH MANGALORE 2-12/6 HILL GROVE CHILIMBI KULOOR-FERRY ROAD FIRST FLOOR MANGALORE
107. STATE BANK OF INDIA SBI INTOUCH LITE MANGALORE[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2917 AL HELEN APARTMENTS, GROUND FLOOR
BEJAI MAIN ROAD,BEJAI MANGALORE- 575004
108. STATE BANK OF INDIA RACPC MANGALORE ESSEL TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, B 5212 BUNT'S HOSTEL CIRCLE MANGALORE 575 003
109. STATE BANK OF INDIA RBO-1, MANGALURU ESSEL TOWERS, 2ND FLOOR, B 5212 BUNT'S HOSTEL CIRCLE MANGALORE 575 003
110. STATE BANK OF INDIA ARYA SAMAJ ROAD BRANCH BALMATTA COMPLEX BALMATTA MANGALORE 575 003
111. STATE BANK OF INDIA LALBAUG BRANCH PB NO: 729, 1ST FLOOR SREE KRISHNA PRASAD M.G. ROAD LALBAUG MANGALORE 575 003
112. STATE BANK OF INDIA , ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE-1, NETWORK-1 FIRST FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
113. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-1, AO -1 GROUND FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE , KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
114. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-2, AO -1 2ND FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
115. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-3, AO -1 2ND FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
116. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-4, AO -1 3RD FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
117. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-5, AO -1 3RD FLOOR, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560254
118. STATE BANK OF INDIA, SHANKARPURAM BRANCH , RANGARAO ROAD, SHANKARPURAM, BANGALORE-560004
119. STATE BANK OF INDIA, KOTHANUR B K CIRCLE BRANCH , NO. 6, KOTHANUR DHINNE MAIN ROAD, JP NAGAR 8TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560076
120. STATE BANK OF INDIA, JAYNAGAR 7TH BLOCK BRANCH , NO. 12, A12, 2ND MAIN JAYANAGAR, 7 TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560070
121. STATE BANK OF INDIA, N R COLONY BRANCH, 39/1, SANNIDHI ROAD N R COLONY, BANGALORE-560004
122. STATE BANK OF INDIA, SBI INTOUCH JAYANAGAR BRANCH 7TH B MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR IV BLOCK (WEST) , BANGALORE-560011
124. STATE BANK OF INDIA, PUTTENAHALLY BRANCH, NO.736, 60 FT ROAD, J P NAGAR VII PHASE, BANGALORE-560078
125. STATE BANK OF INDIA, VYALIKAVAL BRANCH , ANTARIKSH BHAVAN CAMPUS, RMV 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-5600942918 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 126. STATE BANK OF INDIA, SADASIVNAGAR BRANCH , 7/A "VAGDEVI MANE" , 2ND MAIN ROAD, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE- 560003
127. STATE BANK OF INDIA, PBB MALLESHWARAM BRANCH , 49, CHARU ENCLAVE, 17TH CROSS, 10TH A MAIN, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560055
128. STATE BANK OF INDIA, PBB PALACE ORCHARDS BRANCH ,, 382.30/1, 13TH CROSS, UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS, SADASHIVNAGAR, BENGALURE-560080
129. STATE BANK OF INDIA, RACE COURSE ROAD BRANCH, 29/4 RACE COURSE ROAD, TRADE CENTRE, BANGALORE-560001
130. STATE BANK OF INDIA, R M V EXTENSION BRANCH, ANTARIKSH BHAVAN CAMPUS, RMV 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560094
131. STATE BANK OF INDIA, GOKUL EXTENSION BRANCH , 361/1089,1ST STAGE,
II PHASE,
HMT MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560054
132. STATE BANK OF INDIA, JALAHALLI (E) BRANCH, AIR FORC STATION, JALAHALLI EAST, BANGALORE-560014
133. STATE BANK OF INDIA, JALAHALLI (W) BRANCH, HOSPITAL TOWN(WEST), TRIPTI COMPLEX HOSPITAL TOWN, BANGALORE-560015
134. STATE BANK OF INDIA, BEL BRANCH , BHARATH ELECTRONICS LIMITED JALHALLI BANGALORE-560013
135. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MAHA LAKSHMIPURM BRANCH, NO.201, 60 FT MAIN ROAD, INDL.WORKERS LAYOUT, SHANKARNAGAR, BANGALORE (URBAN)-560086
136. STATE BANK OF INDIA, BYARAVESHWAR NAGAR, NO.485, 8TH MAIN, III STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, BANGALORE – 560079
137. STATE BANK OF INDIA, RAJAJI NAGAR 2ND BLOCK BRANCH, NO. 2040, 19TH MAIN ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR II BLOCK EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560010
138. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUDDENNAPALYA VISVESVARAYA
LAYOUT BRANCH , AKSHAY SAI LAKE VIEW, 60 FEET, BANGALORE-560091
139. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MALLATHAHALLI BRANCH , "SOWMYA" NO.94, 80 FT ROAD, ITI LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560056
140. STATE BANK OF INDIA, VIJAYANAGAR BRANCH, NO. 2, (OLD NO 125) 5 TH MAIN, CHBCS 1ST LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 560040
141. STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHANDRA LAYOUT BRANCH , 1235 8TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560040
142. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MAGADI ROAD BRANCH , MANUITEJ TOWERS, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560079
143. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MALAGALA ROAD BRANCH, NO. 2, GANGAMMA GARDENS, MALAGALA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560091
144. STATE BANK OF INDIA, NAGARBHAVI 2ND STAGE BRANCH , BDA SITE NO.188, 80FT RING ROAD, II BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560072
145. STATE BANK OF INDIA, PAPAREDDY PALYA BRANCH ,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2919 NO.353, CHANDAN COMPLEX,
PAPAREDDY PALYA,
NAGARABHAVI II STG,
BANGALORE-560072
146. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
ISRO LAYOUT BRANCH,
694 ISRO LAYOUT,
1ST FLOOR
BANGALORE-560078
147. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
BEML LAYOUT BRANCH,
NO. 251 HALEGEVDARAHALLI ROAD,
60 FT ROAD,
RAJRAJESHWARNAGAR
BANGALORE-560098
148. STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHANNASANDRA BRANCH, NO.147, JAWAHARLAL
NEHRU MAIN ROAD,
150. BANGALORE-560070
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
SRINAGAR (BANGALORE) BRANCH
#1479 SHUBHANGI ENCLAVE, 17TH MAIN,
MUNESHWARA BLOCK,
AVALAHALLI, BANGALORE- 560026
151. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
PADMANABHANAGAR BRANCH,
375,
BANGALORE- 560 070
152. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
BANASHANKAR III STG BRANCH,
RAMANASHREEARC,
PB. NO. 7079,
21ST MAIN,
BANASHANKARI III STG,
BANGLORE -560070
153. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
CHANNASANDRA, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE-560098
149. STATE BANK OF INDIA, BANAGIRINAGAR BRANCH , DEVAGIRI DIVINE,
30TH MAIN
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE,
# 65,
ST. MARK'S ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560001
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2019
का.आका.आका.आका.आ. . . . 755.755.755.755.————कें (cid:9)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 (1987 में यथा
संशोिधत) के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंयूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंयूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंयूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंिडयािडयािडयािडया के सूचीब, कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को
अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक 5ान प्राप्त कर लिया है : —
| 8.सं. | बैंक का नाम | कार्यालयों / शाखाओं की संख्या |
| 1. | य ूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया | 27 |
| क क क ु ल कु ल ु ल | 27272727 |
शैलेश कु मार सिह, संयुक्त निदेशक (राजभाषा)2920 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] यूिनयनयूिनयनयूिनयनयूिनयन बैंकबैंकबैंकबैंक ऑफऑफऑफऑफ इंिडयाइंिडयाइंिडयाइंिडया
राजभाषा िनयम 10(4) में अधिसूचनार्थ शाखाएं / कार्यालय
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 1 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
िसकं दरा शाखा
आगरा
भारत पेट्रोल पंप के पास
नेशनल हाईवे 2, िसकं दरा
आगरा, उत्तर प्रदेश 282007.
2 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
िबसलपुर शाखा
बारह पत्थर चौराहा,
िबसलपुर
पीलीभीत रोड,
िजला- पीलीभीत
तहसील - िबसलपुर
उत्तर प्रदेश 262201.
3 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
िमलक शाखा
रेलवे स्टेशन रोड
पशु चिकित्सालय के पास
िमलक, रामपुर
उत्तर प्रदेश 243708.
4 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
दिल्ली रोड मुरादाबाद शाखा
3 बी/सी 15 बु;ि बिहार,
आवास िवकास
कु न्दन पेट्रोल पंप के पास
दिल्ली रोड,
मुरादाबाद
उत्तर प्रदेश 244001
5 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
रिठौरा शाखा
अलरजा माAकट, भोजीपुरा रोड
रिठौरा, िजला – बरेली
उत्तर प्रदेश 243122
6 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
आर ए बी (यू एल पी) आगरा
6/9 आशीर्वाद बाटिका
कारगिल पेट्रोल पंप के पास
सिकन्दरा बोडला रोड
उत्तर प्रदेश 282007.
7 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया मोहम्मद पुर टांडा शाखा
मोहम्मद पुर टांडा, संभल
िजला संभल
उत्तर प्रदेश 244302.
8 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया िबलासपुर-रामपुर शाखा
तहसील कोर्ट के सामने
के मरी रोड, िबलासपुर रामपुर
उत्तर प्रदेश 244921.
9 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
बरखेरा शाखा
इंGिगंज, बरखेरा, पीलीभीत
रोड
पीलीभीत, उत्तर प्रदेश
262203.
10 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
फतेहगंज पHिमी शाखा
हरी बेंकट हाल, पुिलस चौकी
के पास
पोस्ट फतेह गंज वेस्ट,
एसडी िमरगंज, रामपुर रोड,
बरेली
उत्तर प्रदेश 243501.
11 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
ढोलना शाखा
गांव ढोलना, पोस्ट ढोलना
िजला कासगंज, कांशी राम
नगर उत्तर प्रदेश 207124.
12 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
ठिरिया निजावत खान शाखा
कें ट रोड,
ठिरिया निजावत खान
रोहिल्ला कॉलेज ऑफ मैनेजमेंट[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2921 बरेली,
उत्तर प्रदेश 273123.
13 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
जाजऊ शाखा
लूकरगंज
इलाहाबाद,
उत्तर प्रदेश 211001.
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 19 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
सेक्टर-27 नया रायपुर शाखा
गांव तोड़ू पूरा, पोस्ट सराय
जाजऊ
रायपुर
4 ए- 234, सेक्टर-27
नया रायपुर
तहसील खेरागढ़, आगरा
उत्तर प्रदेश 283124.
14 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
छतीसगढ़, 492002.
20 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंिडया
कालिदी विहार शाखा
कू कनार शाखा
तुलसी धरम कांटा के पास
82, 100 फू ट रोड,
कालिदी विहार
उत्तर प्रदेश 282006.
15 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
कू कनार गांव का कम्यूनिटी
हाल,
पोस्ट चिदगढ़,
िजला सुकमा
जगदलपुर 494115.
कृ ष्णा विहार शाखा
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय,
बी- 1, इन्दु पुरम कॉलोनी
21 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया रजौन (भागलपुर) शाखा पटना
औरंगाबाद रोड, मथुरा
गांव रजौन, पो रजौन,
उत्तर प्रदेश 281001
16 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
िजला – बांका, भागलपुर
िबहार 813107
कु रामई शाखा, गांव कु रामई
22 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
पोस्ट मिरहची, कांशी राम
नगर
उत्तर प्रदेश 207125.
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 17 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया दाPनाहा शाखा , इलाहाबाद
दूबे बिल्डिग,
किसान सेवा कें G
मसौढी शाखा
पुनीत कॉम्प्लेक्स,
ब्लॉक रोड,
मसौढी, पो पटना
िबहार 804452
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 23 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
क्षेत्र महाप्रबंधक कार्यालय, रांची
चौरी पुलिस स्टेशन के पास
महाराजगंज चौरी रोड,
रांची रॉयल स्Wायर बिल्डिग
फिरायालाल नेक्स्ट,
विलेज पोस्ट: दारूनाहा
िजला: संत रिवदास नगर,
भदोही
उत्तर प्रदेश 221402.
18 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
लूकरगंज शाखा
हाउस नं 73/119,
चतुर्थ तल
अरगोड़ा चौक, रांची
झारखंड 834002
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 24 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
जोइसराहरलाहल्ली शाखा मैंगलोर
Xाउं ड Yलोर, प्रॉपर्टी संख्या
34 बस स्टैंड रोड2922 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] चौडप्पालवर अँड ब्रदर्स
क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, 26 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया कॉम्प्लेक्स
कोलार शाखा
बंगलूP
जोइसराहरलाहल्ली
नं 2115, हनुमेगौड़ा
तालुका रानेबेन्नूर,
कॉम्प्लेक्स भूतल, एमबी रोड, िजला हावेरी
कोलार 563101 (कर्नाटक) कर्नाटक 581208.
27 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंिडया 25 यूनियन बैंक ऑफ इंडिया
हरपनहल्ली शाखा सागर शाखा
एसवाई नं 581 व 582 Xाउं ड Yलोर, मिन्नू कॉम्प्लेक्स
निसर्ग लेआउट, हरपनहल्ली
जोग रोड, सागर,
िजगनी होबली, अनेकल िजला िशमोगा राज्य कर्नाटक
तालुका बंगलूP 560083 िपन 577401
(कर्नाटक)
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2019
S.O. 755.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/Branches of Union Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:—
| S erial No. | Name of the Bank | Number of Offices/ Branches |
| 1. | Union Bank of India | 27 |
| Total | 27 |
[F. No.11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)
Union Bank of India
Branches/Offices Recommended For Notification Under Official Language Rule 10(4)
3 Union Bank of India Regional Office, Agra
Milak Branch Railway Station Road Near Pashu Chikitsalay, Milak Uttar Pradesh 243708 1 Union Bank Of India Sikandra Branch Near Bharat Petrol Pump NH-2, Sikandra, Agra Uttar Pradesh 282007
4 Union Bank of India 2 Union Bank of India
Delhi road Moradabad Branch 3 B/C-15, buddhi Bihar, Awas Vikas Behind Kundan Petrol Pump, Delhi Road, Moradabad Uttar Pradesh 244001 Bisalpur Branch Barah Patthar Chauraha Bisalpur, Pilibhit Road District Pilibhit, Tehsil Bisalpur Uttar Pradesh 262201
5 Union Bank of India
Rithaura Branch[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2923 16 Union Bank of India
Alraza Market, Bhojipura Road
Rithaura, District Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh 243122
6 Union Bank of India
Kuramai Branch Vill Kuramai Post Mirahchi Kanshi Ram Nagar Uttar Pradesh 207125
17 Union Bank of India RAB (ULP) Agra 6/9 Ashirwad Batika, Near Kargil Petrol Pump, Sikandra Bodla Road Agra , Uttar Pradesh 282007
Regional Office, Allahabad
7 Union Bank of India
Mohammad Pur Tanda Branch Mohammad Pur Tanda, Sambhal District Sambhal Uttar Pradesh 244302
8 Union Bank of India
Darunaha Branch Dubey Building, Kisan Seva Kendra Adjacent to Chauri Police Station Maharajganjg Chauri Road Vill and PO Darunaha, Dist. Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh 221402
18 Union Bank of India Bilaspur-Rampur Branch Opp SDM Court, Kemari Road, Bilaspur Rampur Uttar Pradesh 244921
9 Union Bank of India
Lukerganj Branch House No.73/119, Lukerganj Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh 211001
19 Union Bank of India
Regional Office, Raipur
Barkhera Branch Indriganj, Barkhera, Pilibhit Road, Pilibhit Uttar Pradesh 262203
10 Union Bank of India
Sector-27 Naya Raipur Branch 4A-234, Sector 27 Naya Raipur (Chhatisgad) 492002
20 Union Bank of India Fatehganj Paschimi Branch C/O Hari Banquet Hall Near Police Chauki, Post Fatehganj West SD Meerganj, Rampur Road Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243501
11 Union Bank of India
Kukanar Branch Community Hall of Kukanar Village, Post Chindgarh, Dist.Sukma Jagadalpur 494115
21 Union Bank of India
Regional Office, Patna
Dholna Branch Vill Dholna, Post Dholna Dist.Kasgan, Kanshi Ram Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 207124
Rajaun (Bhagalpur) Branch Village-Rajaun, P O Rajaun Dist. Banka, Bhagalpur Bihar 813107
12 Union Bank of India
22 Union Bank of India
Masaurhi Branch Punit Complex, Block Road Masaurhi, Dist Patna Bihar 804452 23 Union Bank of India Thiriya Nijavat Khan Branch Cantt Road, Thiriya Nizawat Khan Rohilla College of Management Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 273123
Regional Office, Ranchi
13 Union Bank of India
Jajau Branch Vill Todupura, Post Sarai Jajau Tehsil Kheragarh, Agra Uttar Pradesh 283124
Field General Manager Office, Ranchi Royal Square Building Fourth Floor Angora Chowk, Jharkhand 834002
24 Union Bank of India
Regional Office, Manglore
14 Union Bank of India Kalindi vihar Branch Near tulsi Dharam Kanta, 82, Feet Road, Kalindi Vihar Uttar Pradesh 282006
15 Union Bank of India
Joisaraharalahalli Branch Ground Floor, Property No.34, Choudappalavar & Brothers Complex Bus Stand Road, Joisaraharalahalli Ranebennur, Haveri Karnatak 581208
25 Union Bank of India Krishana Vihar Branch B-1, Indu Puram Colony Aurangabad Road, Mathura Uttar Pradesh 281001
Sagar Branch,2924 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Ground floor, "Minnu Complex" Jog Road, Sagar Dist Shimoga State- Karnaatak Pin code 577401
SY Nos. 581 & 582 Nisarga Layout, Harapanahalli Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluka Bangalore 560083 (Karnataka) 26 Union Bank of India
Regional Office, Banglore
Kolar Branch No.2115, Hanumegouda Complex Ground floor MB Road, Kolar 563101 (Karnataka)
27 Union Bank of India
Harappanahalli Branch
नई दिल्ली, 10 मई, 2019
का.आका.आका.आका.आ.... 756756756756....————कें Gीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 (1987 में
यथा- संशोिधत) के नियम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में भारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेभारतीय स्टेट बैंकट बैंकट बैंकट बैंक के सूचीब; कार्यालयों/शाखाओं को
अिधसूिचत करती है, िजनके 80% से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक hान प्राप्त कर लिया है : —
| j.सं. | बैंक का नाम | कार्यालयों/शाखाओं की संख्या |
| 1. | भारतीय स् टेट बैंक | 106 |
| क क क ु ल कु ल ु ल | 106106106106 |
[फा. सं. 11016/2/2017-हि.(अधि.)]
शैलेश कु मार सिह, संयुक्त निदेशक (राजभाषा)
राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची राजभाषा नियम 1976 के नियम 10(4) के अंतर्गत अधिसूचित की जाने वाली शाखाओं/कार्यालयों की सूची
1. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शकरपुर खास शाखा
नेहP प्लेस शाखा
एच-58, इंGप्रस्थ बिल्डिग
17-18,पू ंज एसेन हाऊस
विकास मार्ग, दिल्ली-110092
नेहP प्लेस,
नई दिल्ली-110019
5. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पटपड़गंज शाखा
2. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बी-139, कमायू ं स्Wायर,
स्कॉप कॉम्प्लेक्स शाखा
वैस्ट विनोदनगर
भू तल, कोर 6, स्कॉप कॉम्प्लेक्स
पटपड़गंज, दिल्ली-110092
लोधी रोड, नई दिल्ली-110003
6. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िववेक िवहार शाखा
3. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
ए-22, भू तल, फे ज-II
कृ ष्णा नगर शाखा
िववेक िवहार,
ए-223, छाची बिल्डिग, मेन रोड
नई दिल्ली-110095
कृ ष्णा नगर, दिल्ली-110051
7. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
4. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मॉडल टाउन शाखा[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2925 एफ-14/53, भू तल
मॉडल टाउन-2,
15. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नई दिल्ली-110009
राम मंदिर शाखा
डी/332, Xाउं ड Yलोर
8. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
राम मंदिर के पास,
दिल्ली-110095
एसएमई शाखा टॉउन हॉल
394, गंगा िनवास
16. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
चांदनी चौक,
डॉ.राजेंG प्रसाद रोड शाखा
नई दिल्ली-110006
कृ िष भवन,
नई दिल्ली-110001
9. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसएमई शाखा
17. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बी-39, मिडल सAकल
गुजरावालान टॉउन शाखा,
कनॉट सर्क स,
ए-4, भू तल
नई दिल्ली-110001
गुजरावालान टॉउन पार्ट-I,
दिल्ली-110009
10. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कटरा नील चांदनी चौक शाखा
18. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कटरा नील के बाहर
पूसा रोड करोल बाग शाखा
208, चांदनी चौक,
नं. 6, पूसा रोड,
दिल्ली-110006
मेट्रो पिलर संख्या 80 के सामने,
नई दिल्ली-110005
11. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
19. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
लाहौरी गेट शाखा
हर्षा भवन शाखा
पो.बॉक्स सं.1233, खारी बावली,
13/29, हर्षा भवन
दिल्ली-110006
ई ब्लॉक, कनॉट प्लेस
नई दिल्ली-110001
12. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बैंक स्ट्रीट शाखा
20. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एफ 2/17-18 कृ ष्णा नगर
नया बाजार शाखा
शाहदरा, दिल्ली-110051
पोस्ट बॉक्स नं.1557
4101-4157
13. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नया बाजार
आचार्य निके तन मयूर विहार शाखा
नई दिल्ली-110006
डी-39-ए, आचार्य निके तन
मयूर िवहार फे ज-I, दिल्ली-110091
21. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शहीद भगत सिह मार्ग शाखा
15-17, शहीद भगत सिह मार्ग
14. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
गोल माकm ट के पास,
वाणिज्यिक शाखा
नई दिल्ली-110001
27, बाराखम्बा रोड
नई दिल्ली-1100012926 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 22. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
झील चौक शाखा
409, झील खुoरजा
गांधी नगर,
नई दिल्ली-110031
23. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
डीडीए वाणिज्यिक कॉम्प्लेक्स शाखा प्लॉट संख्या 32, रोड नं.44
डीडीए वाणिज्यिक कॉम्प्लेक्स वधर्मान प्लाजा, पीतमपुरा नई दिल्ली-110034
24. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नई दिल्ली दरियागंज शाखा
नेताजी सुभाष मार्ग
38, दरियागंज,
नई दिल्ली-110002
25. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मॉडल बस्ती शाखा
8357, 1/3, न्यू कॉलोनी मार्ग फिल्मीस्तान सिनेमा के पास, नई दिल्ली-110005
26. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
के जी मार्ग शाखा
कस्तूरबा गांधी मार्ग
कनॉट प्लेस,
नई दिल्ली-110001
27. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शाpी भवन शाखा
शाpी भवन, राजेंG प्रसाद रोड, नई दिल्ली-110001
28. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नई दिल्ली संसद मार्ग शाखा 30, रीगल बिल्डिग, संसद मार्ग
कनॉट प्लेस,
नई दिल्ली-110001
29. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नई दिल्ली कोंडली शाखा मयूर िवहार फे ज-III, नई दिल्ली-110096
30. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नई दिल्ली पटपड़गंज शाखा
ई-68/ए, पांडव नगर, पटपड़गंज, नई दिल्ली-110092
31. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मयूर िवहार फे ज-I दिल्ली शाखा 101/ए प्रताप नगर
मयूर िवहार के पास,
नई दिल्ली-110091
32. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
संसद मार्ग शाखा
जीवन तारा बिल्डिग
पटेल चौक,
नई दिल्ली-110001
33. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सचदेव प्लाजा-II शाखा फस्र्ट Yलोर, सचदेव प्लाजा-II
मयूर िवहार फे ज-II,
नई दिल्ली-110091
34. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुखर्जी नगर मेट्रो शाखा
523, मुखर्जी नगर,
दिल्ली-110009
35. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आईपी एस्टेट जनरल शाखा एम ब्लॉक, िवकास भवन नई दिल्ली-110002
36. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
जगतपुरी शाखा
ए-5, जगतपुरी,
दिल्ली-110051
37. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाराखम्बा रोड शाखा
जी-3 एवं 4, कं चनजंगा बिल्डिग[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2927 18, बाराखम्बा रोड,
नई दिल्ली-110001
38. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पीबीबी ज्योति नगर शाखा
बी-30, ईस्ट ज्योति नगर,
दिल्ली-110093
39. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सेंट स्टीफं स कॉलेज शाखा
इम्पीरियल एवेन्यू, नॉर्थ कै म्पस
दिल्ली-110007
40. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच हरिजन सेवक संघ शाखा ढrा, गांधी आsम के पास
tकग्सवे कै म्प, दिल्ली-110009
41. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच प्रीत विहार शाखा जी-7 प्रीत विहार,
दिल्ली-110092
42. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच विकास मार्ग शाखा एस-523, स्कू ल ब्लॉक
शकरपुर,
दिल्ली-110092
43. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच tकग्सवे कै म्प शाखा 1603, आउटरेम लेन,
नई दिल्ली-110009
44. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच नॉर्थ दिल्ली कै म्पस शाखा 25 यूए मलकागंज रोड
कमला नगर, दिल्ली-110007
45. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसबीआई इनटच दरियागंज शाखा 82, दयानंद मार्ग
नई दिल्ली-110002
46. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आढ़त बाजार शाखा (30655)
सहारनपुर चौक
देहरादून - 248001
(उत्तराखंड)
47. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हरिद्वार रोड शाखा (50325)
आराघर (धर्मपुर)
देहरादून - 248001
(उत्तराखंड)
48. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
किरसाली शाखा (18791)
सहwधारा रोड
देहरादून - 248001
(उत्तराखंड)
49. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पटेल नगर शाखा (21477)
िनकट लाल पुल
देहरादून - 248001 (उत्तराखंड)
50. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पथरीबाग शाखा (18979)
िनकट एसजीआरआर (पीजी) कॉलेज देहरादून - 248001 (उत्तराखंड)
51. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
त्यागी रोड शाखा (32497)
निकट रेस्ट कैं प,
देहरादून - 248001 (उत्तराखंड)
52. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
पंिडतवाड़ी शाखा (61200)
निकट भारतीय मिलिट्री अकादमी देहरादून - 248001 (उत्तराखंड)
53. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
इनटच मसूरी शाखा (19273) निकट पिक्चर पैलेस, माल रोड, मसूरी देहरादून - 248179 (उत्तराखंड)
भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
54. सीएचटी सेलाकु ई शाखा (51491) मकान सं. 303, जामनपुर,2928 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] निकट जय दुर्गा कॉमxशयल प्लाजा
61. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सेलाकु ई, देहरादून - 248011 (उत्तराखंड)
शीतलाखेड़ा शाखा (32678)
खसरा सं. 3, शाहपुर
55. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
शीतलाखेड़ा, हरिद्वार - 247663
देहरादून ॠिषके श रोड शाखा (51373)
(उत्तराखंड)
वार्ड सं. 2, िमसरवाला
62. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
देहरादून रोड, डोईवाला
स्टेशन रोड शाखा (50514)
देहरादून - 248140 (उत्तराखंड)
स्टेशन रोड,
हरिद्वार - 249401 (उत्तराखंड)
56. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मंडी चौक िवकास नगर शाखा (51265)
63. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मेन रोड, वार्ड/क्षेत्र – 3,
शिव कांप्लैक्स शाखा (50615)
िनकट मंडी चौक
शिव कांप्लैक्स, कोतवाली के सामने
िसिवल लाइन,
अनिल आई क्लीिनक के सामने
रूड़की - 247667 (उत्तराखंड)
िवकास नगर,
देहरादून - 248198 (उत्तराखंड)
64. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
57. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आर्य नगर शाखा (31909)
डाक पत्थर शाखा (18983)
बजरंग भवन के सामने, कनखल
हाइडल कॉलोनी के सामने
हरिद्वार रोड, रामनगर
िवकास नगर रोड,
हरिद्वार - 249407
देहरादून - 248125
(उत्तराखंड)
(उत्तराखंड)
65. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
58. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
आदर्श नगर शाखा (61211)
मसूरी बाईपास शाखा (61226)
880 (1), न्यू आदर्श नगर
निकट किसान भवन,
निकट Xीनवे पब्लिक स्कू ल
oरग रोड, नत्थनपुर
रूड़की - 247667
देहरादून - 248114
(उत्तराखंड)
(उत्तराखंड)
66. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
59. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सोसाइटी रोड शाखा (18992)
भािनयावाला शाखा (18982)
तहसील के सामने, लक्सर
िनकट एचआईएचटी गेट
हरिद्वार - 247663
Xाम अथूरवाला, ॠिषके श रोड
(उत्तराखंड)
देहरादून - 248140
(उत्तराखंड)
67. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अखोरी शाखा (18975)
Xाम अखोरी गोडाधार
60. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तहसील घनसाली
न्यू विकास कॉलोनी शाखा (51121)
टिहरी गढ़वाल - 249155
पौड़ी, पौड़ी गढ़वाल - 246001
(उत्तराखंड)
(उत्तराखंड)[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2929 68. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
के -ब्लॉक, वैभव खyड
बुराड़ी रोड शाखा (51120)
इंदिरापुरम िजला-गािजयाबाद
न्यू टिहरी टाउनशिप
उत्तर प्रदेश-201014
टिहरी गढ़वाल - 249001 (उत्तराखंड)
77. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
69. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
वैशाली शाखा
तपोवन शाखा (61036)
प्लॉट नं0 21,
तपोवन, देवप्रयाग
सूर्य कनिष्क टॉवर
टिहरी गढ़वाल - 249192 (उत्तराखंड)
सेक्टर-4, वैशाली िजला- गािजयाबाद
उत्तर प्रदेश-201012
70. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तनावXस्त आस्ति वसूली शाखा (61109)
78. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
दूसरी मंिजल, अजीत कांप्लैक्स
कोर्ट रोड शाखा प्रकाश चौक के पास सहारनपुर रोड
िजला-मुजYफरनगर
देहरादून - 248001
उत्तर प्रदेश-251001
(उत्तराखंड)
79. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
71. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बुधाना रोड शाखा
सौराखाल शाखा (18995)
िजला – शामली
गांव सौराखाल
उत्तर प्रदेश -247776
रूGप्रयाग – 246171
80. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
72. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक भगवती भवन
अबूपुर शाखा
शाखाबॉम्बे बाजारजिला – मेरठ
खसरा नं. 534, अम्बेडकर बस्ती
उत्तर प्रदेश – 250001
िजला-गािजयाबाद-201206
73. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
81. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
नवयुग माAकट शाखा10,
सेक्टर-18 शाखा
नवयुग माAकट िजला - गािजयाबाद
जी-14/15, नौएडा
उत्तर प्रदेश-201001
िजला-गौतमबु;नगर
उत्तर प्रदेश-201301
74. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
रामपुरी शाखा
82. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सूर्यनगर, िजला-गािजयाबाद
किशोर गार्डन शाखा
उत्तर प्रदेश-201011
बरौला माकm ट सेक्टर-49, नौएडा
िजला- गौतमबु;नगर
75. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
उत्तर प्रदेश- 201301
कै प्टन सूरी रोड शाखा
एसआई-7, शाpी नगर
83. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
िजला-गािजयाबाद
सेक्टर-1 शाखा
उत्तर प्रदेश-201002
ई- 6 (बी), नौएडा
िजला-गौतमबु;नगर
76. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
उत्तरप्रदेश-201301
गौड़ Xीन सिटी शाखा2930 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 84. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
91. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
भाटी भवन शाखा
जिदल नगर शाखा
Xाम गिरधरपुर दनकौर
एन एच-9,
Xेटर नौएडा, िजला-गौतमबु;नगर
जिदल नगर
उत्तर प्रदेश-203202
िजला-हापुड़
उत्तर प्रदेश-201302
85. भरतीय स्टेट बैंक
सिविल लाइन्स शाखा
92. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
संस्कार अस्पताल के पास
रेलवे रोड शाखा िजला-हापुड़
िजला-बुलंदशहर
उत्तर प्रदेश-245101
उत्तर प्रदेश-203001
86. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
93. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एस एम ई शाखा
आयादनगर शाखा Xाम आयादनगर
खुर्जा जंक्शन रोड खुर्जा,
िजला-हापुड़,
िजला-बुलंदशहर
उत्तर प्रदेश-245101
उत्तर प्रदेश-203131
94. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
87. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कु ं वरपुर गोलापर शाखा
गामा शॉपिग कॉम्पलेक्स शाखा
कु ं वरपुर गोलापार, िजला- नैनीताल जगत फार्म,
िपन कोड– 263139
सेक्टर गामा-1
Xेटर नौएडा
उत्तर प्रदेश – 201308
95. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
धारी शाखा
88. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
तहसील- धारी,
मेरीडियन विzू प्लाजा शाखा
िजला- नैनीताल
ब्लॉक-ई, पारसनाथ बिभव प्लाजा
िपन कोड– 263136
अल्फा कमxशयल बेल्ट,
Xेटर नौएडा
96. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक िजला-गौतमबु;नगर
रामपुर रोड शाखा
उत्तर प्रदेश-201308
रामपुर रोड, हल्द्वानी
िपन कोड– 263139
89. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
सेंट्रल माAकट शाखा
97. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक शाpी नगर, िजला-मेरठ
उत्तर प्रदेश-250004
एसबीआई इनटच शाखा
नैनीताल रोड,
90. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
हल्द्वानी
प्रभात नगर शाखा
िपन कोड– 263139
168, प्रभात नगर
िजला-मेरठ,
98. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक उत्तर प्रदेश-250001
एमसीएससी मॉल रोड शाखा[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2931 शॉपिग कॉम्प्लेक्स,
मॉल रोड, अल्मोड़ा
िपन कोड– 263601
99. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बनबसा बाज़ार शाखा बनबसा बाज़ार, बनबसा िजला- चंपावत िपन कोड– 262310
100. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
अक्सोरा शाखा
गांव- अक्सोरा,
डाकघर- बनलेख
िजला- बागे{र,
िपन कोड– 263634
101. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
झनकट शाखा
िसतारगंज रोड, झनकट
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 262308
102. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
बाजपुर रोड काशीपुर शाखा
बाजपुर रोड, काशीपुर
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 244713
103. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
मुख्य चौराहा काशीपुर शाखा
मुख्य चौराहा,
काशीपुर
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 244713
104. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
एसएमई सिविल लाइंस PGपुर शाखा
173/3, सिविल लाइंस PGपुर
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 263153
105. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
टनकपुर रोड खटीमा शाखा
टनकपुर रोड, खटीमा
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 262308
106. भारतीय स्टेट बैंक
कि}छा रोड सितारगंज शाखा
कि}छा रोड, िसतारगंज
िजला- ऊधम सिह नगर
िपन कोड– 262405
New Delhi, the 10th May, 2019
S.O. 756.—In pursuance of sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987),the Central Government, hereby notifies the listed Offices/ Branches of State Bank of India, more than 80% of the staff whereof have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:-
| erial No. | Name of the Bank | Number of Offices/ Branches |
| 1. | State Bank of India | 106 |
| Total | 106 |
[F. No. 11016/2/2017-OL(Noti.)]
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, Jt. Director (OL)2932 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
List of branches/offices to be notified under rule 10(4) of Rajbhasha Rules 1976
1. State Bank of India
Nehru Place Branch 17-18, Punj Essen House Nehru Place, New Delhi-110019
2. State Bank of India
Scope Complex Branch Ground Floor, Core 6, Scope Complexs Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003
3. State Bank of India
Krishna Nagar Branch A-223, Chhachi Building, Main Road Krishna Nagar, Delhi-110051
4. State Bank of India
Shakarpur Khas Branch H-58 Indraparstha Building Vikas Marg, Delhi-110092
5. State Bank of India
Patparganj Branch B-139, Kamaun Square, West Vinodnagar Patparganj, Delhi-110092
6.
State Bank of India Vivek Vihar Branch A-22, Ground Floor, Phase-II Vivek Vihar, New Delhi-110095
7. State Bank of India
Model Town Branch F-14/53, Ground Floor Model Town-2, New Delhi-110009
8. State Bank of India
SME Branch Town Hall 394, Ganga Niwas, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi-110006
9. State Bank of India
SME Branch B-39, Middle Circle Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001
10. State Bank of India
Katra Neel Chandni Chowk Branch Outside Katra Neel 208, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006
11 State Bank of India Lahori Gate Branch P.No.1233, Khari Baoli, Delhi-110006
12. State Bank of India Bank Street Branch F2/17-18 Krishna Nagar Shahdara, Delhi-110051
13. State Bank of India
Acharya Niketan Mayur Vihar Branch D-39-A, Acharya Niketan Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi-110091
14. State Bank of India
Commercial Branch 27, Barakhambha Road New Delhi-110001
15. State Bank of India
Ram Mandir Branch D/332, Ground Floor, Near Ram Mandir, Delhi-110095
16. State Bank of India
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road Branch Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001
17. State Bank of India
Gujrawalan Town Branch A-4, Ground Floor Gujranwala Town Part-I, Delhi-110009
19. State Bank of India
Harsha Bhawan Branch 13/29, Harsha Bhawan E Block, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001
20. State Bank of India Naya Bazar Branch PB No.1557, 4101-4157 Naya Bazaar New Delhi-110006
21. State Bank of India
Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg Branch 15-17, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2933 New Delhi-110091
Near Gole Market, New Delhi-110001
32. State Bank of India
22. State Bank of India
Parliament Street Branch Jeevan Tara Building Patel Chowk, New Delhi-110001
Jheel Chowk Branch, 409, Jheel Khurinja Gandhi Nagar, New Delhi-110031
33. State Bank of India
23. State Bank of India
Sachdeva Plaza-II Branch 1stFloor, Sachdeva Plaza-II Mayur Vihar Phase-II, New Delhi-110091
DDA Commercial Complex Branch Plot No.32 Road No.44 DDA Commercial Complex Vardhman Plaza, Pitampura New Delhi-110034
34. State Bank of India
24. State Bank of India
Mukherjee Nagar Metro Branch 523, Mukherjee Nagar Delhi-110009
35. State Bank of India
New Delhi Daryaganj Branch Netajee Subhash Marg 38, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002
25. State Bank of India
IP Estate General Branch M Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi-110002
36. State Bank of India
Model Basti Branch 8357, 1/3, New Colony Marg Near Filmistan Cinema, New Delhi-110005
Jagatpuri Branch A-5, Jagatpuri, Delhi-110051
26. State Bank of India
37. State Bank of India
KG Marg Branch Kastoorba Gandhi Marg Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001
Barakhamba Road Branch G-3&4, Kanchanjanga Building 18, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001
27. State Bank of India
38. State Bank of India
PBB Jyoti Nagar Branch B-30, East Jyoti Nagar, Delhi-110093
Shastri Bhawan Branch Shastri Bhawan Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110001
39. State Bank of India
28. State Bank of India
St.Stephens College Branch Imperial Avenue, North Campus Delhi-110007
40. State Bank of India
New Delhi Parliament Street Branch 30, Regal Building, Parliament Street Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001
29. State Bank of India
SBI Intouch Harijan Sewak Sangh Branch Dhakka, Near Gandhi Ashram Kingsway Camp, Delhi-110009
New Delhi Kondli Branch Mayur Vihar Phase-III New Delhi-110096
41. State Bank of India
30. State Bank of India
SBI Intouch Preet Vihar Branch G-7 Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092
New Delhi Patparganj Branch E-68/A Pandav Nagar Patparganj, New Delhi-110092
42. State Bank of India
31. State Bank of India
SBI Intouch Vikas Marg Branch S-523, School Block Shakarpur, Delhi-110092
Mayur Vihar Phase-I Delhi Branch 101/A Pratap Nagar Near Mayur Vihar2934 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 43. State Bank of India
Sbi Intouch Kingsway Camp Branch 1603, Outram Lane, New Delhi-110009
44. State Bank of India
SBI Intouch North Delhi Campus Branch 25 UA Malkaganj Road Kamla Nagar, Delhi-110007
45. State Bank of India
SBI Intouch Daryaganj Branch 82, Dayanand Marg, New Delhi-110002 46. STATE BANK OF INDIA
ARHAT BAZAR BRANCH (30655) SAHARANPUR CHOWK DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
47. STATE BANK OF INDIA
HARIDWAR ROAD BRANCH (50325) ARAGHAR (DHARAMPUR) DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
48. STATE BANK OF INDIA
KIRSALI BRANCH (18791) SAHASTRADHARA ROAD DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
49. STATE BANK OF INDIA
PATEL NAGAR BRANCH (21477) NEAR LALPOOL, DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
50. STATE BANK OF INDIA
PATHRIBAGH BRANCH (18979) NEAR SGRR (PG) COLLEGE DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
51. STATE BANK OF INDIA
TYAGI ROAD BRANCH (32497) NEAR REST-CAMP DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
52. STATE BANK OF INDIA
PANDITWARI BRANCH (61200) NEAR INDIAN MILITARY ACADEMY DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
53. STATE BANK OF INDIA
IN TOUCH MUSSOORIE BRANCH (19273) NEAR PICTURE PALACE MALL ROAD MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN (UK) – 248179
54. STATE BANK OF INDIA
CHT SELAQUI (51491) HOUSE NO. 303, JAMANPUR NEAR JAI DURGA COMMERCIAL PLAZA SELAQUI, DEHRADUN (UK) – 248011 55. STATE BANK OF INDIA
DEHRADUN RISHIKESH ROAD BRANCH (51373) WARD NO. 2, MISSERWALA DEHRADUN ROAD, DOIWALA DEHRADUN (UK) – 248140
56. STATE BANK OF INDIA
MANDICHOWK VIKAS NAGAR BRANCH (51265) MAIN ROAD, WARD/AREA-3, NEAR MANDI CHOWK OPPOSITE ANIL EYE CLINIC, VIKAS NAGAR, DEHRADUN (UK) – 248198
57. STATE BANK OF INDIA
DAK PATHAR BRANCH (18983) OPPOSITE HYDEL COLONY VIKAS NAGAR ROAD , DEHRADUN (UK) – 248125
58. STATE BANK OF INDIA
MUSSOORIE BYPASS BRANCH (61226) NEAR KISAN BHAWAN, RING ROAD, NATHANPUR DEHRADUN (UK) – 248114
59. STATE BANK OF INDIA
BHANIYAWALA BRANCH (18982) NEAR HIHT GATE VILLAGE ATHOORWALA, RISHIKESH ROAD DEHRADUN (UK) - 248140
60. STATE BANK OF INDIA
NEW VIKAS COLONY BRANCH (51121) PAURI, PAURI GARHWAL (UK) – 246001
61. STATE BANK OF INDIA
SHEETLAKHERA BRANCH (32678) KHASRA NO. 3, SHAHPUR SHEETLAKHERA, HARIDWAR (UK) – 247663
62. STATE BANK OF INDIA
STATION ROAD BRANCH (50514) STATION ROAD, HARIDWAR (UK) – 249401
63. STATE BANK OF INDIA
SHIV COMPLEX BRANCH (50615) SHIV COMPLEX, OPPOSITE KOTWALI CIVIL LINE, ROORKEE (UK) – 247667 64. STATE BANK OF INDIA
ARYA NAGAR BRANCH (31909) OPPOSITE BAJRANG BHAWAN, KANKHAL HARIDWAR ROAD, RAMNAGAR HARIDWAR (UK) – 249407[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2935 65. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Distt.- Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh -201002
76. State Bank of India
ADARSH NAGAR BRANCH (61211) 880 (1) NEW ADARSH NAGAR NEAR GREENWAY PUBLIC SCHOOL ROORKEE (UK) – 247667
66. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Gaur Green City Branch K- Block, Vaibhav Khand Indirapuram, Distt.- Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh -201014
SOCIETY ROAD BRANCH (18992) OPPOSITE TEHSIL, LAKSAR HARIDWAR (UK) – 247663
77. State Bank of India
67. STATE BANK OF INDIA
AKHORI BRANCH (18975) VILLAGE AKHORI GODADHAR TEHSIL GHANSALI TEHRI GARHWAL (UK) – 249155
Vaishali Branch Plot No.21, Surya Kanishk Tower sector-4, Vaishali Distt.- Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh -201012
68. STATE BANK OF INDIA
BURARI ROAD BRANCH (51120) NEW TEHRI TOWNSHIP TEHRI GARHWAL (UK) – 249001
69. STATE BANK OF INDIA
78. State Bank of India Court Road Branch Near Prakash chowk Distt. Mujaffar Nagar Uttar Pradesh -251001
79. State Bank of India
TAPOVAN BRANCH (61036) TAPOVAN, DEVPRAYAG TEHRI GARHWAL (UK) – 249192
70. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Budhana Road Branch Distt.- shamli Uttar Pradesh -247776
80. State Bank of India
STRESSED ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH (61109) 2ndFLOOR, AJEET COMPLEX SAHARANPUR ROAD, DEHRADUN (UK) – 248001
AboopurBranch Khasra No.534, Ambedkar Basti Distt.- Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh -201206
71. STATE BANK OF INDIA
81. State Bank of India
Sector-18 Branch, G-14/15, Noida Distt.- Gautambudh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh -201301
SAURAKHAL BRANCH (18995) VILLAGE SAURAKHAL DISTT. RUDRAPRAYAG (UK) – 246171
82. State Bank of India
72. State Bank of India
Bhagwati Bhawan Branch Bombay Bazar, Distt.- Meerut, Uttar Pradesh -250001
Kishore Garden Branch Baraula Market Sector-49, Noida Distt.- Gautambuddh Nagar Uttar Pradesh – 201301
73. State Bank of India
83. State Bank of India
Navyug Market Branch 10,Navyug Market Distt.- Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh -201001
Sector-1 Branch E-6(B), Noida Distt.- Gautambudh Nagar Uttar Pradesh -201301
74. State Bank of India
84. State Bank of India
Rampuri Branch Surya Nagar Distt.- Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh -201011
Bhati Bhawan Branch Village Girdharpur Dankaur Greater Noida Distt-Gautambudh Nagar Uttar Pradesh -203202
75. State Bank of India
85. State Bank of India
Captain Suri Road Branch S I -7, Shastri Nagar
Civil LinesBranch2936 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Near Sanskar Hospital Distt.- Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh -203001
95. STATE BANK OF INDIA DHARI BRANCH TEH-DHARI, DISTT.- NAINITAL, PIN CODE– 263136
86. State Bank of India
96. STATE BANK OF INDIA
SMEBranch Khurja Junction Road Khurja, Distt.- Bulandshahr Uttar Pradesh – 203131
RAMPUR ROAD BRANCH RAMPUR ROAD, HALDWANI PIN CODE– 263139
87. State Bank of India
97. STATE BANK OF INDIA SBI INTOUCH BRANCH NAINITAL ROAD, HALDWANI PIN CODE– 263139
Gama Shopping Complex Branch Jagat Farm, Sector Gama -1 Greater Noida Uttar Pradesh – 201308
98. STATE BANK OF INDIA
88. State Bank of India
MCSCMALL ROAD BRANCH SHOPING COMPLEX MALL ROAD, ALMORA PIN CODE – 263 601
99. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Maridean View Plaza Branch Block – E, Parasnath Vibhab Plaza Alpha Commercial Belt; Greater Noida Distt.- Gautambudh Nagar Uttar Pradesh -201308
89. State Bank of India
BANBASA MARKET BRANCH BANBASA MARKET, BANBASA DISTT.- CHAMPAVAT PIN CODE– 262310
100. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Central Market Branch Shastri Nagar Distt.- Meerut Uttar Pradesh -250004
90. State Bank of India
AKSORA BRANCH VILL.- AKSORA, PO- BANLEKH DISTT.- BAGESHWAR PIN CODE– 263634
101. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Prabhat Nagar Branch 168, Prabhat Nagar Distt.- Meerut, Uttar Pradesh -250001
JHANKAT BRANCH SITARGANJ ROAD, JHANKAT DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR PIN CODE– 262308
91. State Bank of India JindalNagar Branch N H-9, JindalNagar Distt.- Hapur, Uttar Pradesh -201302
102. STATE BANK OF INDIA
92. State Bank of India
Railway Road Branch Distt.- Hapur Uttar Pradesh -245101
BAJPUR ROAD KASHIPUR BRANCH BAJPUR ROAD, KASHIPUR DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR PIN CODE– 244713
93. State Bank of India
103. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Aayad Nagar Branch Village Aayad Nagar Distt.- Hapur , Uttar Pradesh -245101
MAIN CHAURAHA KASHIPUR BRANCH MAIN CHAURAHA KASHIPUR DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR PIN CODE– 244713
94. STATE BANK OF INDIA
104. STATE BANK OF INDIA
KUNWARPUR GOLAPAR BRANCH KUNWARPUR GOLAPAR, DISTT.- NAINITAL PIN CODE– 263139
SME CIVIL LINES RUDRAPUR BRANCH 173/3, CIVIL LINES RUDRAPUR DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR PIN CODE– 263153[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2937 105. STATE BANK OF INDIA
106. STATE BANK OF INDIA
TANAKPUR ROAD KHATIMA BRANCH
KICHHA ROAD SITARGANJ BRANCH TANAKPUR ROAD,KHATIMA
KICHHA ROAD,
DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
SITARGANJ
PIN CODE– 262308
DISTT.- UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
PIN CODE– 262405
शु,िशु,िशु,िशु,ि----पत्रपत्रपत्रपत्र
नई दिल्ली, 13 मई, 2019
का. आ. का. आ. का. आ. का. आ. 757.757.757.757.————भारत सरकार, वित्त मंत्रालय, वित्तीय सेवाएं विभाग की 18 फरवरी, 2019 की अधिसूचना
संख्या का.आ. 246, िजसे 23 फरवरी, 2019 को भारत के राजपत्र भाग-II, खyड 3, उप-खंड (ii) में प्रकाशित किया गया था, में "नेट वेस्ट माकm ~स पीएलसी" को "नेटवेस्ट माकm ~स पीएलसी" पढ़ा जाए।
[फा. सं. 7/173/2018–बीओए-I]
ए. के . घोष, अवर सिचव
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi, the 13th May, 2019
S.O. 757.—In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services, number S.O. 246, dated the 18th February 2019, published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub- section (ii), dated the 23rd February 2019, for "NetWest Markets PLC" read "NatWest Markets Plc".
[F. No. 7/173/2018-BOA-I]
A. K. GHOSH, Under Secy.
2938 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]का(cid:3)मक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयका(cid:3)मक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयका(cid:3)मक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालयका(cid:3)मक, लोक शिकायत तथा पेंशन मंत्रालय
(का(cid:4)मक और (का(cid:4)मक और (का(cid:4)मक और (का(cid:4)मक और प्रशिप्रशिप्रशिप्रशि क्षण क्षण क्षण क्षण िवभाग)िवभाग)िवभाग)िवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 6 मई, 2019
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 758758758758....————कें (cid:11)ीय सरकार, (cid:13)ी तुषार मेहता, भारत के महा सॉलिसिटर के साथ (cid:13)ी संजय जैन,अपर महा सॉिलिसटर को २ जी स्पैक्ट्रम मामलों में उ% न्यायालयों और उ%तम न्यायलय के समक्ष अपीलों या पुनरीक्षणों आदि का संचालन करने के लिए विशेष लोक अभियोजक के रूप में नियुक्त करती है| इसके अतिरिक्त, (cid:13)ी संजय जैन, भारत के विद्वान् महा सॉलिसिटर के सीधे पर्यवेक्षण के अधीनं 2 जी स्पैक्ट्रम मामलों में उक्त अपील या पुनरीक्षण में उपस्थित होंगे और जब कभी यह वांछनीय है, भारत के िवद्वान् महा सॉलिसिटर अपने विवेकानुसार उपस्थित होंगे और मामले में बहस करेंगे I
[ फा. सं. 225/59/2014-एवीडी-II]
पी. के . जायसवाल, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 6th May, 2019
S.O. 758.—The Central Government hereby appoints Shri Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General as Special Public Prosecutor for conducting appeals or revisions, etc., before High Courts and Supreme Court in 2G spectrum cases along with Shri Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India. Further, Shri Sanjay Jain will appear in the said appeal or revision in 2G Spectrum cases under the direct supervision of Ld. Solicitor General of India and whenever it is desirable, the Ld. Solicitor General of India would appear and argue the matter at his discretion.
[F. No. 225/59/2014-AVD-II]
P. K. JAISWAL, Under Secy.
कृ षि सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याकृ षि सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याकृ षि सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याकृ षि सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालयण मंत्रालय
((((कृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभागकृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभागकृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभागकृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग))))
नई दिल्ली, 10 दिसम्बर, 2018
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 759759759759....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, कृ षि सहकारिता एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय कृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियमावली 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में भा0कृ 0अ0प0- भारतीय पशु चिकित्सा अनुसंधान संस्थान क्षेत्रीय के न्(cid:11), पालमपुर, हिमाचल प्रदेश को जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Dान प्राप्त कर िलया है, एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है।
[फा. सं. 13-10/2009-हिदी/464-509]
राजेश कु मार, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, COOPERATION AND FARMER WELFARE
(Department of Agricultural Research and Education)
New Delhi, the 10th December, 2018
S.O. 759.—In pursuance of sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules 1976, the Central Government, Ministry of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmer Welfare, Department of Agricultural Research & Education hereby notifies the ICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Station, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh where more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. 13-10/2009-Hindi/464-509]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2939नई दिल्ली, 17 जनवरी, 2019
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 760760760760....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, कृ िष एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय, कृ िष अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा िवभाग, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के िलए प्रयोग) िनयमावली 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में राष्ट्रीय कृ िष कीट संसाधन ब्यूरो, बेल्लारी रोड, हैब्बाल, बैंगलूL को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Dान प्राप्त कर िलया है, एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है।
[फा. सं. 13-10/2009-हिदी/12-57]
राजेश कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 17th January, 2019
S.O. 760.—In pursuance of sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules 1976, the Central Government, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmer Welfare, Department of Agricultural Research & Education hereby notifies the ICAR- National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bangalore where more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[No. 13-10/2009-Hindi/12-57]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 20 फरवरी, 2019
का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. का.आ. 761761761761....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, कृ िष एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय, कृ िष अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा िवभाग, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के िलए प्रयोग) िनयमावली 1976 के िनयम 10 के उपिनयम (4) के अनुसरण में भाकृ अप - राष्ट्रीय बीजीय मसाला अनुसंधान के न्(cid:11), अजमेर को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Dान प्राप्त कर िलया है, एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करती है।
[फा. सं. 13-10/2009-हिदी/75-99]
राजेश कु मार, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 20th February, 2019
S.O. 761.—In pursuance of sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official purpose of the Union) Rules 1976, the Central Government, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmer Welfare, Department of Agricultural Research & Education hereby notifies the ICAR- National Research Center on Seed Spices, Ajmer where more than 80% of staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. 13-10/2009-Hindi/75-99]
RAJESH KUMAR, Under Secy.
dks;yk ea=ky;dks;yk ea=ky;dks;yk ea=ky;dks;yk ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 9 ebZ] 2019
dkdkdkdk----vkvkvkvk---- 762762762762----—dsUnzh; ljdkj us dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu Hkkjr ljdkj ds dks;yk ea=ky; }kjk tkjh dh xbZ vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 1346] rkjh[k 2 twu] 2017] tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] Hkkx II] [kaM 3] mi&[kaM ¼ii½] rkjh[k 3 twu] 2017 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh] ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V ifj{ks= dh Hkwfe esa ftldk eki 266-650 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 658-89 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ gS] dks;ys dk iwosZ{k.k djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nh Fkh;
vkSj dssUnzh; ljdkj dks ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa of.Zkr mDr Hkwfe ds Hkkx esa dks;yk vfHkizkIr gS;
vr%] dsUnzh; ljdkj] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 7 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk izznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, blls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr mDr Hkwfe esa ;k ij lHkh vf/kdkj 184-81 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 456-66 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki dh Hkwfe dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nsrh gSA2940 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] fVIi.k fVIi.k fVIi.k fVIi.k 1%1%1%1% bl vf/klwpuk ds v/khu vkus okys {ks= ds js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e ¼Ikh,yth½@Hkwfe@526] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 dk fujh{k.k dysDVj] ftyk lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkmFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM] ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½ lhir jksM] fcykliqj & 495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA fVIi.k 2% mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 8 ds mica/kksa dh vksj /;ku vkd`"V fd;k tkrk gS] ftlesa fuEufyf[kr mica/k gS%& vtZu ds ckcr~ vkifRr;kWa-& ^^8 ¼1½ dksbZ O;fDr tks fdlh Hkwfe esa ftldh ckcr~ /kkjk 7 ds v/khu vf/klwpuk fudkyh xbZ gS] fgrc) gS] vf/klwpuk ds fudkys tkus ls rhl fnu ds Hkhrj lEiw.kZ Hkwfe ;k mlds fdlh Hkkx ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds fdUgha vf/kdkjkas dk vtZu fd, tkus ds ckjs esa vkifRr dj ldsxkA Li"Vhdj.kLi"Vhdj.kLi"Vhdj.kLi"Vhdj.k----&&&&bl /kkjk ds vFkkZUrxZr ;g vkifRr ugha ekuh tk,xh fd dksbZ O;fDr fdlh Hkwfe esa dks;yk mRiknu ds fy, Loa; [kuu lafØ;k,a djuk pkgrk gS vkSj ,slh lafØ;k,a dsUnzh; ljdkj ;k fdlh vU; O;fDr dks ugha djuh pkfg,A ¼2½ mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu izR;sd vkifRr l{ke izkf/kdkjh dks fyf[kr :i esa dh tk,xh vkSj l{ke vf/kdkjh] vkifRrdrkZ dks Loa; lqus tkus dk ;k fof/k O;olk;h }kjk lquokbZ dk volj nsxk vkSj ,slh lHkh vkifRr;ksa dks lquus ds i'pkr~ vkSj ,slh vfrfjDr tkWp];fn dksbZ gks]djus ds i'pkr] tks og vko';d le>rk gS] og ;k rks /kkjk 7 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu vf/klwfpr Hkwfe ds ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkjksa ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ ;k ,slh Hkwfe ds fofHkUu VqdMsa ;k ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkjksa ds laca/k esa vkifRr;ksa ij viuh flQkfj'kksa vkSj mlds }kjk dh xbZ dk;Zokgh ds vfHkys[k lfgr fofHkUu fjiksVZa dsUnzh; ljdkj dks mlds fofu'p; ds fy, nsxkA ¼3½ bl /kkjk ds iz;kstuksa ds fy, og O;fDr fdlh Hkwfe esa fgrc) le>k tk,xk tks izfrdj esa fgr dk nkok djus dk gdnkj gksxk] ;fn Hkwfe ;k fdlh ,slh Hkwfe esa ;k ml ij ds vf/kdkj bl vf/kfu;e ds v/khu vftZr dj fy, tkrs gSA ^^ fVIi.k 3%fVIi.k 3%fVIi.k 3%fVIi.k 3% dsUnzh; ljdkj us dks;yk fu;a=d] 1] dkmafly gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 dks] mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3 ds v/khu vf/klwpuk la[;k dk- vk- 905] rkjh[k 20 ekpZ] 1987 tks Hkkjr ds jkti=] Hkkx II] [kaM 3] mi&[kaM ¼iia½] rkjh[k 4 vizSy] 1987 esa izdkf'kr dh x;h }kjk] l{ke izkf/kdkjh ds :i esa fu;qDr fd;k gSA
vuqlwph vuqlwph vuqlwph vuqlwph
egkek;k vkslhih ¼ lsa/kksikjk&II Cykd½] HkVxkao {ks=]
ftyk& lqjtiqj ¼NRrhlx<+½
[js[kakd la[;k ,lbZlh,y@ch,lih@th,e¼Ikh,yth½@Hkwfe@526] rkjh[k 19 ekpZ] 2019 ]
lHkh vf/kdkj% ¼d½ jktLo "wfe %
| Øe la- | x zke dk uke | x zke la[;k | rglhy | ftyk | {ks= gsDVj esa | fVIif.k;ka | NaN |
| 1- | CkjkS/kh | 178 | HkS;kFkku | lqjtiqj | 51-94 | Hkkx | NaN |
| 2- | tjgh | 103 | izrkiiqj | lqjtiqj | 67-46 | Hkkx | NaN |
| 3- | lsU/kksikjk | 37 | izrkiiqj | lqjtiqj | 17-22 | Hkkx | NaN |
| 4- | nqjrh | 39 | izrkiiqj | lqjtiqj | 34-18 | Hkkx | NaN |
| dqy % 170-80 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 422-04 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ | NaN | ||||||
| Øe la- | dEikVZesaV la[;k | jsat | fMfotu | {ks= gsDVj esa | fVIif.k;ka | NaN | |
| 1- | ih 1681 | izrkiiqj | lqjtiqj | 14-01 | Hkkx | NaN | |
| dqy % 14.01 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 34.62 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ | NaN |
;k 456.66 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 29411- xzke cjkS/kh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 50(Hkkx), 51(Hkkx), 56(Hkkx), 58(Hkkx), 59(Hkkx), 60(Hkkx), 60@602] 61@603] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 64(Hkkx), 65(Hkkx), 66(Hkkx), 67] 68(Hkkx), 69(Hkkx), 70] 71@2] 72(Hkkx), 87(Hkkx) ls 89(Hkkx), 98@1(Hkkx), 105@600] 106 ls 109] 110(Hkkx) ls 113(Hkkx), 114] 118(Hkkx), ls 121(Hkkx), 122@1 ls 122@3] 123@1] 123@2(Hkkx), 124 ls 134] 127@601] 135(Hkkx), 136 ls 138] 139(Hkkx), 140@1] 140@2] 140@3(Hkkx), 141@2] 149] 210(Hkkx), 219] 220] 236 ls 240] 244] 246 ls 252] 256] 258] 259] 267 ls 280] 281@1] 281@2] 282 ls 284] 285@1] 285@2] 286] 287@1] 287@2] 288] 289] 290@1 ls 290@4] 291 ls 298] 299@1 ls 299@10] 300 ls 311] 312@1 ls 312@3] 313] 314@1] 314@2] 315@1] 315@2] 316] 317] 318@1 ls 318@3] 319] 320] 321@1] 321@2] 322 ls 334] 335@1 ls 335@5] 336 ls 338] 339@1] 339@2] 340] 341@1] 341@2] 342@1 ls 342@4] 343] 344(Hkkx), 346(Hkkx) ls 349(Hkkx), 351@1(Hkkx) ls 351@3(Hkkx), 352(Hkkx), 353@1 ls 353@3] 354 lss 358] 359(Hkkx), 360@1(Hkkx), 360@2(Hkkx).
2- xzke tjgh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 2 ls 26] 31] 32] 33(Hkkx), 34 ls 36] 37@1] 59] 60] 61(Hkkx), 62(Hkkx), 63 ls 65] 66(Hkkx), 105(Hkkx), 121(Hkkx), 175(Hkkx), 176 ls 181] 182(Hkkx), 283(Hkkx), 287(Hkkx), 289(Hkkx), 290 ls 295] 296(Hkkx), 297 ls 340] 341(Hkkx), 342(Hkkx), 343] 344] 345(Hkkx), 346(Hkkx), 347 ls 352] ] ] ] 353(Hkkx), 355(Hkkx), 362(Hkkx), 363(Hkkx), 364 ls 459] 462 ls 468] 469(Hkkx), 471(Hkkx), 472(Hkkx), 498(Hkkx), 499] 500(Hkkx), 502 ls 506] 507(Hkkx), 508 ls 510] 535(Hkkx), 538@1] 538@2] 539@1] 539@2] 540(Hkkx), 541(Hkkx), 549(Hkkx), 550(Hkkx), 551] 552(Hkkx), 553(Hkkx), 554] 555(Hkkx), 556(Hkkx), 558 ls 563] 565] 566(Hkkx), 567 ls 581] 582(Hkkx), 583(Hkkx), 584] 585(Hkkx), 586 ls 588] 589(Hkkx), 590(Hkkx), 605(Hkkx) ls 609(Hkkx), 790(Hkkx) ls 793(Hkkx), 798(Hkkx), 799(Hkkx), 800 ls 805-
3- xzke lsU/kksikjk ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 3(Hkkx), 4(Hkkx), 5@1] 5@2] 6(Hkkx), 7 ls 11] 12(Hkkx) ls 14(Hkkx), 17(Hkkx), 26(Hkkx), 27 ls 30] 31(Hkkx), 32] 33(Hkkx), 36(Hkkx), 56(Hkkx), 58(Hkkx), 61(Hkkx), 62@2] 63(Hkkx), 64 ls 74] 75(Hkkx), 76(Hkkx), 78] 79(Hkkx), 80(Hkkx) ls 84(Hkkx), 86(Hkkx) ls 88(Hkkx), 89] 90(Hkkx) lss 94(Hkkx), 95] 96(Hkkx), 97(Hkkx), 136@1(Hkkx).
4- xzke nqjrh ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 632(Hkkx), 650(Hkkx) ls 653(Hkkx), 654] 655(Hkkx), 1055(Hkkx), 1056(Hkkx), 1160(Hkkx), 1164(Hkkx) ls 1167(Hkkx), 1168 ls 1172] 1173(Hkkx), 1174 ls 1176] 1177(Hkkx) ls 1179(Hkkx) 1183(Hkkx), 1184] 1185(Hkkx), 1199(Hkkx), 1200(Hkkx), 1229(Hkkx) ls 1231(Hkkx), 1450(Hkkx) lss 1457(Hkkx), 1458] 1459(Hkkx), 1460] 1461(Hkkx), 1462(Hkkx).
lhek o.kZu %lhek o.kZu %lhek o.kZu %lhek o.kZu %
Cykd & Cykd & Cykd & Cykd &
d&[k&x js[kk fcUnq **d** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke cjkS/kh ds IykV la[;k 89] 88] 87] 61] 62] 64] 65] 66] 69] 71@2] 50@4] 50@5] 50@3] 50@2] 50@1] 68] 51] 60@10] 56@1] 60@8] 60@2] 58] 60@7] 113] 123@2] 121@2] 120] fcUnq *[k*] 119] 118@9] 118@6] 135] 139] 142 ls gksdj 149 ds nf{k.kh]if'peh] mRrjh vkSj iwohZ lhek] 140@4 ds mRrjh] 210] 266 ls gksdj] 267] 250 ds mRrjh] 252] 256] 258] 259] 258] 236] 220] 219 ds if'peh lhek] xzke cjkS/kh&tjgh vkSj tjgh&diljk ds Hkkxr% lfEefyr lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x** ij feyrh gSA
x&?k&³ js[kk fcUnq ^x^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds IykV la[;k 3] 4] 5] 7@1] 7@2] 24] 26@1] 26@2 ds iwohZ lhek] 26@2] fcUnq *?k*] *] *] *] 32] 31 ds nf{k.kh] 60] 64] 65 ds iwohZ] 65 ds nf{k.kh] 66] 62] 61] 33 ls gksdj] 37@1 ds nf{k.kh] xzke cjkS/kh&tjgh ds Hkkxr% lfEefyr lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **³** ij feyrh gSA
³&d js[kk fcUnq ^³^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke cjkS/kh ds IykV la[;k 349] 348] 346] 344] 351] 352] 359] 360] 110] 111] 112] 98] 89 ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **d** ij feyrh gSA2942 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Cykd&Cykd&Cykd&Cykd&II % % % %
p&N&t js[kk fcUnq ^p^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds IykV la[;k 805 ds if'peh] 805] 121] 175] 182] 363] 362] 355] 353] 296 ls gksdj] 294] 290 ds mRrjh lhek] fcUnq *N*] 289] 538] 540] 549] 550 ls gksdj QkjsLV dEikVZesaV la[;k 1681] 606] 605] QkjsLV dEikVZesaV la[;k 1681] 603] QkjsLV dEikVZesaV la[;k 1681 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **t** ij feyrh gSA
t&> js[kk fcUnq ^t^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke nqjrh ds IykV la[;k 1456] 1455] 1459] 1454] 1451] 1452] 1453] 1454] 1461] 1462] 1457 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **>** ij feyrh gSA
>&´ js[kk fcUnq ^>^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds QkjsLV dEikVZesaV la[;k 1681] IykV la[;k 603] QkjsLV dEikVZesaV la[;k 1681] IykV la[;k 608] 609] 597] 552] 553 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **´** ij feyrh gSA
´&p js[kk fcUnq ^´^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke tjgh ds IykV la[;k 553] 597] 555] 556] 566 ls gksdj 563] 558 ds mRrjh] 558] 559] 560] 561] ds iwohZ] 561] 562 ds nf{k.kh] 562] 565 ds if'peh] 590] 589] 583] 582] 507] 500] 498] 341] 342] 472] 346] 345] 472] 471 ls gksdj] 463] 459] 468 ds iwohZ] 799] 798] 793] 792] 791] 790] 805 ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **p** ij feyrh gSA
Cykd &Cykd &Cykd &Cykd & III % % % %
V&B js[kk fcUnq ^V^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke lsU/kksikjk ds IykV la[;k 3] 4@2] 5@1] 6] 36] 61] 58] 62] 63] 56] 75] 76] 81] 80@1] 80@2] 79@2 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **B** ij feyrh gSA
B&M&< js[kk fcUnq ^B^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke nqjrh ds IykV la[;k 1055] 1056] 1165] 1164] 1166] 1167] 1173] 1177] 1178] 1179] 1183] 655] 653] 652] 632] fcUnq *M*] 651] 650] 1185] 1199] 1200] 1179] 1176] 1227] 1229] 1230] 1231 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq ^<^ ij feyrh gSA
<&V js[kk fcUnq ^<^ ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke lsU/kksikjk ds IykV la[;k 97@1] 96] 94] 93] 92] 91] 90] 88] 87] 86] 81] 82] 83] 84] 136@1 ls gksdj 71] 69] 66] 36] 32 ds nf{k.kh lhek] 31] 26] 8 ls gksdj 10] 11 ds nf{k.kh lhek] 17] 3 ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq ^V^ ij feyrh gSA
[Qk- la- 43015@21@2017&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj]
jke f'kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 9th May, 2019
S.O. 762.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1346, dated the 2nd June, 2017 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 or 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 3rd June, 2017, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 266.650 hectare (approximately) or 658.89 acre (approximately) of the lands in the locality specified in the schedule annexed to that notification;
And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands described in the Schedule appended to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire the land measuring 184.81 hectare (approximately) or 456.66 acre (approximately) as all rights in or over the said land described in the schedule appended hereto.
Note 1 : The plan bearing number SECL/BSP/GM(PLG)/LAND/526, dated the 19th March, 2019 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata – 700001 or in the office of the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur- 495006 (Chhattisgarh).
Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the said Act which provides as follows:-
Objection to Acquisition.--
"8(1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of the notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or any rights in or over such land.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2943Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operation in the land for the production of coal and that such operation should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing, and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either makes a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of the proceedings held by him, for the decision of the Government.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act."
Note 3 : The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata, 700001, has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S.O. 905, dated the 20th March, 1987, published in part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 4th April, 1987.
SCHEDULE
Mahamaya OCP (Sendhopara-II Block), Bhatgaon Area,
District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
[ Plan bearing number SECL/ BSP/ GM(PLG)/ LAND/ 526, dated the 19th March, 2019 ]
All right:
(A) Revenue Land:
| Sl. No. | Name of village | Village number | Tahsil | District | Area in hectares | Remarks | NaN |
| 1. | Barudhi | 178 | Bhaiyathan | Surajpur | 51.94 | Part | NaN |
| 2. | Jarhi | 103 | Pratappur | Surajpur | 67.46 | Part | NaN |
| 3. | Sendhopara | 37 | Pratappur | Surajpur | 17.22 | Part | NaN |
| 4. | Durti | 39 | Pratappur | Surajpur | 34.18 | Part | NaN |
| Total :- 170.80 hectares (approximately) or 422.04 acres (approximately) | NaN | ||||||
| Sl. No. | Compartment number | Range | Division | Area in hectares | Remarks | NaN | |
| 1. | P 1681 | Pratappur | Surajpur | 14.01 | Part | NaN | |
| Total :- 14.01 hectares (approximately) or 34.62 acres (approximately) | NaN |
or 456.66 acres (approximately)
1. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Barudhi (Part): 50(P), 51(P), 56(P), 58(P), 59(P), 60(P), 60/602, 61/603, 61(P), 62(P), 64(P), 65(P), 66(P), 67, 68(P), 69(P), 70, 71/2, 72(P), 87(P) to 89(P), 98/1(P), 105/600, 106 to 109, 110(P) to 113(P), 114, 118(P) to 121(P), 122/1 to 122/3, 123/1, 123/2(P), 124 to 134, 127/601, 135(P), 136 to 138, 139(P), 140/1, 140/2, 140/3(P), 141/2, 149, 210(P), 219, 220, 236 to 240, 244, 246 to 252, 256, 258, 259, 267 to 280, 281/1, 281/2, 282 to 284, 285/1, 285/2, 286, 287/1, 287/2, 288, 289, 290/1 to 290/4, 291 to 298, 299/1 to 299/10, 300 to 311, 312/1 to 312/3, 313, 314/1, 314/2, 315/1, 315/2, 316, 317, 318/1 to 318/3, 319, 320, 321/1, 321/2, 322 to 334, 335/1 to 335/5, 336 to 338, 339/1, 339/2, 340, 341/1, 341/2, 342/1 to 342/4, 343, 344(P), 346(P) to 349(P), 351/1(P) to 351/3(P), 352(P), 353/1 to 353/3, 354 to 358, 359(P), 360/1(P), 360/2(P).
2. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Jarhi (Part): 2 to 26, 31, 32, 33(P), 34 to 36, 37/1, 59, 60, 61(P), 62(P), 63 to 65, 66(P), 105(P), 121(P), 175(P), 176 to 181, 182(P), 283(P), 287(P), 289(P), 290 to 295, 296(P), 297 to 340, 341(P), 342(P), 343, 344, 345(P), 346(P), 347 to 352, 353(P), 355(P), 362(P), 363(P), 364 to 459, 462 to 468, 469(P), 471(P), 472(P), 498(P), 499, 500(P), 502 to 506, 507(P), 508 to 510, 535(P), 538/1, 538/2, 539/1, 539/2, 540(P), 541(P), 549(P), 550(P), 551, 552(P), 553(P), 554, 555(P), 556(P), 558 to 563, 565, 566(P), 567 to 581, 582(P), 583(P), 584, 585(P), 586 to 588, 589(P), 590(P), 605(P) to 609(P), 790(P) to 793(P), 798(P), 799(P), 800 to 805.
2944 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]3. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Sendhopara (Part): 3(P), 4(P), 5/1, 5/2, 6(P), 7 to 11, 12(P) to 14(P), 17(P), 26(P), 27 to 30, 31(P), 32, 33(P), 36(P), 56(P), 58(P), 61(P), 62/2, 63(P), 64 to 74, 75(P), 76(P), 78, 79(P), 80(P) to 84(P), 86(P) to 88(P), 89, 90(P) to 94(P), 95, 96(P), 97(P), 136/1(P).
4. Plot numbers to be acquired in village Durti (Part): 632(P), 650(P) to 653(P), 654, 655(P), 1055(P), 1056(P), 1160(P), 1164(P) to 1167(P), 1168 to 1172, 1173(P), 1174 to 1176, 1177(P) to 1179(P), 1183(P), 1184, 1185(P), 1199(P), 1200(P), 1229(P) to 1231(P), 1450(P) to 1457(P), 1458, 1459(P), 1460, 1461(P), 1462(P).
Boundary description:
Block – I:
A-B-C Line starts from point 'A' and passes in village Barudhi through plot number 89, 88, 87, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 69, 71/2, 50/4, 50/5, 50/3, 50/2, 50/1, 68, 51, 60/10, 56/1, 60/8, 60/2, 58, 60/7, 113, 123/2, 121/2, 120, point 'B', 119, 118/9, 118/6, 135, 139, 142, along southern,western, northern & eastern boundary of plot number 149, northern boundary of 140/4, through 210, 266, along northern boundary of 267, 250, western boundary of plot number 252, 256, 258, 259, 258, 236, 220, 219, along partly common boundary of villages Barudhi-Jarhi and Jarhi-Kapsara and meets at point 'C'.
C-D-E Line starts from point 'C' and passes in village Jarhi along eastern boundary of plot number 3, 4, 5, 7/1, 7/2, 24, 26/1, 26/2, along southern boundary of 26/2, point "D", 32, 31, along eastern boundary of 60, 64, 65, along southern boundary of 65, through 66, 62, 61, 33, along southern boundary of 37/1, along partly common boundary of villages Barudhi-Jarhi and meets at point 'E'.
E-A Line starts from point 'E' and passes in village Barudhi through plot number 349, 348, 346, 344, 351, 352, 359, 360, 110, 111, 112, 98, 89 and meets at starting point 'A'.
Block-II:
F-G-H Line starts from point 'F' and passes in village Jarhi along western boundary of plot number 805, through 805, 121, 175, 182, 363, 362, 355, 353, 296, along northern boundary of 294, 290, point "G", through 289, 538, 540, 549, 550, Forest compartment 1681, plot number 606, 605, Forest compartment 1681, 603, Forest compartment 1681 and meets at point 'H'.
H-I Line starts from point 'H' and passes in village Durti through 1456, 1455, 1459, 1454, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454, 1461, 1462, 1457 and meets at point 'I'.
I-J Line starts from point 'I' and passes in village Jarhi through Forest compartment 1681, plot number 603, Forest compartment 1681, plot number 608, 609, 597, 552, 553 and meets at point 'J'.
J-F Line starts from point 'J' and passes in village Jarhi through plot number 553, 597, 555, 556, 566, along northern boundary of 563, 558, eastern boundary of 558, 559, 560, 561, southern boundary of 561, 562, western boundary of 562, 565, through 590, 589, 583, 582, 507, 500, 498, 341, 342, 472, 346, 345, 472, 471, eastern boundary of 463, 459, 468, through 799, 798, 793, 792, 791, 790, 805 and meets at starting point 'F'.
Block-III:
K-L Line starts from point 'K' and passes in village Sendhopara through plot number 3, 4/2, 5/1, 6, 36, 61, 58, 62, 63, 56, 75, 76, 81, 80/1, 80/2, 79/2 and meets at point 'L'.
L-M-N Line starts from point 'L' and passes in village Durti through plot number 1055, 1056, 1165, 1164, 1166, 1167, 1173, 1177, 1178, 1179, 1183, 655, 653, 652, 632 , point 'M', 651, 650, 1185, 1199, 1200, 1179, 1176, 1227, 1229, 1230, 1231 and meets at point 'N'.
N-K Line starts from point 'N' and passes in village Sendhopara through plot number 97/1, 96, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 88, 87, 86, 81, 82, 83, 84, 136/1, along southern boundary of plot number 71, 69, 66, 36, 32, through 31, 26, 8, along southern boundary of 10, 11, through 17, 3 and meets at starting point 'K'.
[F. No. 43015/ 21/ 2017-LA&IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
ubZ fnYyh] 9 ebZ] 2019
dkdkdkdk----vkvkvkvk---- 763763763763----&&&&dsUnzh ljdkj us dks;yk /kkjd {ks= ¼vtZu vkSj fodkl½ vf/kfu;e] 1957 ¼1957 dk 20½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 7 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh Hkkjr ljdkj ds dks;yk ea=ky; dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk- vk- 103] rkjh[k 12 tuojh] 2018 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= Hkkx AA] [k.M 3] mi&[k.M ¼AaAa½] rkjh[k 20 tuojh] 2018 esa izdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh] ml vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V ifj{ks= dh 37-866 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 93-56 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ Hkwfe esa ;k ,slh Hkwfe ij ds Hkw&lrg vf/kdkjksa dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh lwpuk nh FkhA
vkSj l{ke izkf/kdkjh us mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 8 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj dks viuh fjiksVZ ns nh gS([भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2945 vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dk iwoksZDr fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus~ ds i'pkr~ vkSj e/; izns'k ljdkj ls ijke'kZ djus ds i'pkr~ ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd blls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr 37-866 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 93-56 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki okyh Hkwfe esa ;k ,sls Hkwfe;ksa ij ds Hkw&lrg vf/kdkj vftZr fd, tkus pkfg,(
vr%] vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 9 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd blls layXu vuqlwph esa of.kZr 37-866 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 93-56 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ eki okyh Hkwfe esa ;k ,sls Hkwfe;ksa ij ds Hkw&lrg vf/kdkj vftZr fd, tkrs gSA
bl vf/klwpuk ds vUrxZr vkus okys {ks= ds js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@tsvks,p@foU?;k&III@,y ,.M vkj@lhch,@ 18@525] rkjh[k 14 tuojh] 2019 dk fujh{k.k dysDVj]'ftyk mefj;k ¼e/; izns'k½ ds dk;kZy; esa ;k dks;yk fu;a=d]1] dkamfly gkml LVªhV] dksydkrk & 700001 ds dk;kZy; esa ;k lkmFk bZLVuZ dksyQhYM~l fyfeVsM ¼jktLo vuqHkkx½] lhir jksM] fcykliqj &495006 ¼NRrhlx<+½ ds dk;kZy; esa fd;k tk ldrk gSA
vuqlwph
foU/;k fMiyfjax Cykd&III] tksfgyk {ks=
ftyk& mefj;k ¼e/; izns'k½
¼js[kkad la[;k ,lbZlh,y@tsvks,p@foU?;k&III]@,y ,.M vkj@lhch,@18@525] rkjh[k 14 tuojh] 2019½
Hkw&lrg vf/kdkj%
| dze la- | xzke dk uke | tujy la[;kad | iVokjh gYdk la[;kad | rglhy | ftyk | {ks= gsDVj esa | fVIif.k;ka |
| 1- | MxMkSvk | 290 | 15 | ukSjkstkckn | mefj;k | 22.604 | Hkkx |
| 2- | egqjk | 577 | 14 | ukSjkstkckn | mefj;k | 15.262 | Hkkx |
| dqy % 37.866 gsDVj ¼yxHkx½ ;k 93.56 ,dM+ ¼yxHkx½ |
1- xzke MxMkSvk ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 83(Hkkx) ls 88(Hkkx), 89] 90] 91(Hkkx), 92(Hkkx), 94] 181(Hkkx), 185(Hkkx), 186(Hkkx), 187(Hkkx), 203(Hkkx), 204(Hkkx), 241-
2- xzke egqjk ¼Hkkx½ esa vftZr fd, tkus okys IykV la[;k% 238 (Hkkx), 240 (Hkkx), 243 (Hkkx), 247 (Hkkx), 248 (Hkkx), 249 (Hkkx), 250] 270 (Hkkx), 276 (Hkkx), 277 (Hkkx), 278] 279] 280 (Hkkx), 281] 282 (Hkkx), 285 (Hkkx), 286 (Hkkx), 306 (Hkkx), 331 (Hkkx), 333] 335 (Hkkx), 337 (Hkkx).
lhek o.kZu %
Cykd & I%
d&d1&d2 js[kk fcUnq **d** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds IykV la[;k 204@1] 241] fcUnq **d1** ls gksdj 203@1x] 203@1[k ds mRrjh lhek ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **d2** ij feyrh gSA
d2&d3&d4 js[kk fcUnq **d2** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds fcUnq **d3**] IykV la[;k 83] 84] 85] 86] 87] 88] 91] 92] 94 ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **d4** ij feyrh gSA
d4&d5&d6&d7 js[kk fcUnq **d4** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds IykV la[;k 92] 181]203@2x@2] 187] fcUnq **d5**] **d6** ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **d7** ij feyrh gSA
d7&d8&d9&d10&d11 js[kk fcUnq **d7** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds IykV la[;k 186] 185] fcUnq **d8**]ls gksdj 185] 186 ds iwohZ lhek] fcUnq **d9**] **d10** ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **d11** ij feyrh gSA
d11&d12&d13 js[kk fcUnq **d11** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds IykV la[;k 186@3] 186@4] 187@3[k] 187@3d] 187@2d] 187@2[k] 187@4[k@2] 203@2x@2] 203@1d] 203@1[k] fcUnq **d12**] 203@1x ls xqtjrh gqbZ fcUnq **d13** ij feyrh gSA
d13&d14&d js[kk fcUnq **d13** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke MxMkSvk ds IykV la[;k 204@1] fcUnq **d14**] IykV la[;k 204@1 ds if'peh lhek ls xqtjrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **d** ij feyrh gSA
Cykd & II%%
[k&[k1&[k2&[k3&&[k4&[k5 js[kk fcUnq **[k** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 240] 243] 249] fcUnq **[k1**] **[k2**] IykV la[;k 248] fcUnq **[k3**] **[k4** ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **[k5** ij feyrh gSA2946 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] [k5&[k6&[k7 js[kk fcUnq **[k5** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 247] fcUnq **[k6** ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **[k7** ij feyrh gSA
[k7&[k8&[k9&[k10 js[kk fcUnq **[k7** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 247] 248 ds nf{k.kh lhek] fcUnq **[k8**] **[k9** ls gksdj] 249 ds nf{k.kh lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **[k10** ij feyrh gSA
[k10&[k11&[k12&[k js[kk fcUnq **[k10** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 250 ds iwohZ lhek] fcUnq **[k11**] 250] **[k12**] 238 ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **[k** ij feyrh gSA
Cykd & III%%
x&x1&x2&x3&&x4 js[kk fcUnq **x** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 270@1[k] 279 ds mRrjh lhek] fcUnq **x1**] **x2**] **x3** ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x4** ij feyrh gSA
x4&x5&x6 js[kk fcUnq **x4** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 279 ds mRrjh lhek] 280@3] fcUnq **x5** ls gksdj 280@2[k] 280@1] 281 ds iwohZ lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x6** ij feyrh gSA
x6&x7& x8&x9 js[kk fcUnq **x6** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 282 ds iwohZ lhek] fcUnq **x7**] IykV la[;k 282] fcUnq **x8** ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x9** ij feyrh gSA
x9&x10& x11&x12 js[kk fcUnq **x9** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 281 ds nf{k.kh lhek] fcUnq **x10** ls gksdj IykV la[;k 285 ds iwohZ lhek] fcUnq **x11**] IykV la[;k 285] 286 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **x12** ij feyrh gSA
x12&x13&x14&x js[kk fcUnq **x12** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 281] 278 ds if'peh lhek] fcUnq **x13**] IykV 277] fcUnq **x14**] IykV la[;k 276]270@1[k ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **x** ij feyrh gSA
Cykd & IV:
?k&?k1&?k2 js[kk fcUnq **?k** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 331]333]335 ds mRrjh lhek] fcUnq **?k1**] 335] 337 ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **?k2** ij feyrh gSA
?k2&?k3& ?k4&?k5 js[kk fcUnq **?k2** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 337] 333 ds nf{k.kh lhek] fcUnq **?k3**] fcUnq **?k4** ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **?k5** ij feyrh gSA
?k5&?k6&?k7 js[kk fcUnq **?k5** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 333 ds if'peh lhek] fcUnq **?k6**] IykV la[;k 331 ds nf{k.kh lhek ls gksrh gqbZ fcUnq **?k7** ij feyrh gSA
?k7&?k js[kk fcUnq **?k7** ls vkjaHk gksrh gS vkSj xzke egqjk ds IykV la[;k 331 ds if'peh lhek ls gksrh gqbZ vkjafHkd fcUnq **?k** ij feyrh gSA
[Qk- la- 43015@33@2017&,y, ,.M vkbZvkj ]
jke f'kjksef.k ljkst] mi lfpo
New Delhi, the 9th May, 2019
S.O. 763.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 103, dated the 12th January, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 20th January, 2018, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire 37.866 hectares (approximately) or 93.56 acres (approximately) land as surface rights in or over such lands specified in the Schedule appended to that notification.
And whereas the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act has made his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the aforesaid report and after consulting the Government of Madhya Pradesh, is satisfied that the lands measuring 37.866 hectares (approximately) or 93.56 acres (approximately) as surface rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired;
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub -section (1) of section 9 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the land measuring 37.866 hectares (approximately) or 93.56 acres (approximately) as surface rights in or over such lands as described in Schedule are hereby acquired.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2947The plan bearing number SECL/JOH/VINDHY-III/L&R/CBA/18/525, dated the 14th January, 2019 of the area covered by this notification may be inspected at the Office of the Collector, District Umaria (Madhya Pradesh) or at the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata – 700001 or at the Office of the South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Revenue Section), Seepat Road, Bilaspur-495006 (Chhattisgarh).
SCHEDULE
Vindhya Depillaring Block-III, Johilla Area
District - Umaria (Madhya Pradesh)
[Plan bearing number SECL/JOH/VINDHY-III/L&R/CBA/18/525, dated the 14th January, 2019]
Surface Rights:
| Sl. No. | Name of Village | General number | Patwari halka number | Tahsil | District | Area in hectares | Remarks |
| 1. | Dagdaua | 290 | 15 | Nowrozabad | Umaria | 22.604 | Part |
| 2. | Mahura | 577 | 14 | Nowrozabad | Umaria | 15.262 | Part |
| Total:- 37.866 hectares (approximately) or 93.56 acres (approximately). |
1. Plot numbers acquired in village Dagdaua (Part): 83(P) to 88(P), 89, 90, 91(P), 92(P), 94, 181(P), 185(P), 186(P), 187(P), 203(P), 204(P), 241.
2. Plot numbers acquired in village Mahura (Part): 238(P), 240(P), 243(P), 247(P), 248(P), 249(P), 250, 270(P), 276(P), 277(P), 278, 279, 280(P), 281, 282(P), 285(P), 286(P), 306(P), 331(P), 333, 335(P), 337(P).
Boundary description:
Block – I:
A-A1-A2 Line starts from point 'A' and passes in village Dagdaua through plot numbers 204/1, 241, point 'A1', along northern boundary of plot number 203/1g, 203/1kh and meets at point 'A2'.
A2-A3-A4 Line starts from point 'A2' and passes in village Dagdaua through point 'A3', plot numbers 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 91, 92, 94 and meets at point 'A4'.
A4-A5-A6-A7 Line starts from point 'A4' and passes in village Dagdaua along eastern boundary 92, 181, 203/2g/2, 187, point 'A5', 'A6' and meets at point 'A7'.
A7-A8-A9-A10-A11 Line starts from point 'A7' and passes in village Dagdaua through plot numbers 186, 185, point 'A8', along eastern boundary of plot numbers 185, 186, point 'A9', 'A10' and meets at point 'A11'.
A11-A12- A13 Line starts from point 'A11' and passes in village Dagdaua through plot numbers 186/3,186/4, 187/3kh, 187/3k, 187/2k, 187/2kh, 187/4kh/2, 203/2g/2, 203/1k, 203/1kh, point 'A12', 203/1g and meets at point 'A13'.
A13-A14 -A Line starts from point 'A13' and passes in village Dagdaua through plot number 204/1, point 'A14, along western boundary of plot number 204/1 and meets at starting point 'A'.
Block –II:
B-B1-B2- B3-B4-B5 Line starts from point 'B' and passes in village Mahura through plot numbers 240, 243, 249, point 'B1', 'B2', plot number 248, point 'B3', 'B4' and meets at point 'B5'.
B5-B6-B7 Line starts from point 'B5' and passes in village Mahura through plot number 247, point 'B6' and meets at point 'B7'.
B7-B8-B9–B10 Line starts from point 'B7' and passes in village Mahura along southern boundary2948 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] of plot numbers 247, 248, point 'B8', 'B9', along southern boundary of plot number 249 and meets at point 'B10'.
B10-B11- B12-B Line starts from point 'B10' and passes in village Mahura along eastern boundary of plot number 250, through point 'B11', 250, point 'B12', 238 and meets at starting point 'B'.
Block – III:
C-C1-C2- C3-C4 Line starts from point 'C' and passes in village Mahura along northern boundary of plot numbers 270/1kh, 279, through point 'C1', 'C2', ' C3' and meets at point 'C4'.
C4-C5-C6 Line starts from point 'C4' and passes in village Mahura along northern boundary of plot number 279, through 280/3, point 'C5', along eastern boundary of 280/2kh, 280/1, 281 and meets at point 'C6'.
C6-C7-C8-C9 Line starts from point 'C6' and passes in village Mahura along eastern boundary of plot number 282, through point 'C7', 282, point 'C8' and meets at point 'C9'.
C9-C10-C11-C12 Line starts from point 'C9' and passes in village Mahura along southern boundary of plot number 281, through point 'C10', along eastern boundary of 285, point 'C11', through plot numbers 285, 286 and meets at point 'C12'.
C12-C13- C14-C Line starts from point 'C12' and passes in village Mahura along western boundary of plot numbers 281, 278, through point 'C13', plot number 277, point 'C14', plot numbers 276, 270/1kh and meets at starting point 'C'.
Block – IV:
D-D1-D2 Line starts from point 'D' and passes in village Mahura along northern boundary of plot numbers 331, 333, 335, through point 'D1', 335, 337 and meets at point 'D2'.
D2-D3-D4-D5 Line starts from point 'D2' and passes in village Mahura along southern boundary of plot numbers 337, 333, through point 'D3', 'D4', and meets at point 'D5'.
D5-D6-D7 Line starts from point 'D5' and passes in village Mahura along western boundary of plot number 333, through point 'D6', along southern boundary of 331 and meets at point 'D7'.
D7-D Line starts from point 'D7' and passes in village Mahura along western boundary of plot number 331 and meets at starting point 'D'.
[F. No. 43015/ 33/ 2017-LA & IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. 764. 764. 764. 764....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है ) की धारा 4 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचना संख्यांक का. आ. 1354, तारीख 10 सितम्बर, 2018, जो भारत के
राजपत्र के भाग II, खPड 3, उप-खPड (ii), तारीख 15 सितम्बर, 2018 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अिधसूचना से उपाबR अनुसूची में विनिSदष्ट परिक्षेत्र की भूमि में जिसका माप 84.14 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 207.91 एकड़ (लगभग) है, कोयले का पूवTक्षण करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वVणत उक्त भूिम के भाग में कोयला अभिप्राप्त है;
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2949अत:, अब, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 7 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Wए, इससे संलग्न अनुसूची में वXणत 84.14 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 207.91 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना देती है ।
टिप्पटिप्पटिप्पटिप्पण ण ण ण 1 :1 :1 :1 : इस अधिसूचना के अधीन आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्यांक सी - ।(ई) ।।।/ एफआर/944-0319, तारीख 11 मार्च, 2019 का निरिक्षण कलेक्टर, िजला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1, काउं िसल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता- 700 001 के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्\स िलिमटेड, (राजस्व िवभाग), कोल इस्टेट, सिविल लाईन्स, नागपुर - 440 001 (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है ।
टिप्पटिप्पटिप्पटिप्पण ण ण ण 2 :2 :2 :2 : उक्त अधिनियम की उपधारा 8 के उपबंधों की ओर ध्यान आकृ ष्ट किया जाता है, जिसमें निम्निलिखत उपबंध है :-
"8 अर्जन के बाबत् आपत्तियॉ.-(1) कोई _यक्ति जो किसी भूमि में, जिसकी बाबत् धारा 7 के अधीन अिधसूचना िनकाली गई है, हितबR है, अिधसूचना के जारी किए जाने से तीस दिन के भीतर सम्पूर्ण भूमि या उसके किसी भाग या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के किन्हa अधिकारों का अर्जन किए जाने के बारे में आपत्ति कर सके गा ।
स्पष्टीकरण.- इस धारा के अंतर्गत यह आपत्ति नहa मानी जाएगी, कि कोई _यक्ति किसी भूमि में कोयला उत्पादन के लिए स्वयं खनन संbियाएं करना चाहता है और ऐसी संbियाएं के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार या किसी अन्य _यक्ति को नहa करनी चािहए।
(2) उप-धारा (1) के अधीन प्रत्येक आपत्ति सक्षम प्राधिकारी को लिखित रूप में की जाएगी और सक्षम प्राधिकारी, आपत्तिकर्ता को स्वयं सुने जाने, विधि _यवसायी द्वारा सुनवाई का अवसर देगा और ऐसी सभी आपत्तियों को सुनने के पश्चात् और ऐसी अतिरिक्त जांच, यदि कोई हो, करने के पश्चात् जो वह आवश्यक समझता है, वह या तो धारा 7 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन अधिसूचित भूमि के या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में एक रिपोर्ट या ऐसी भूमि के विभिन्न टुकड़ों या ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकारों के संबंध में आपत्तियों पर अपनी सिफारिशों और उसके द्वारा की गई कार्यवाही के अभिलेख सहित विभिन्न रिपोर्ट के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार को उसके विनिश्चय के िलए देगा ।
(3) इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए वह _यक्ति किसी भूमि में हितबR समझा जाएगा जो प्रतिकर में हित का दावा करने का हकदार हो, यदि भूमि या किसी ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के अधिकार इस अधिनियम के अधीन अVजत कर लिए जाते है ।"
टिप्पण 3: के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार ने कोयला नियंत्रक 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 को उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 3 के अधीन अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2519, तारीख 27 मई, 1983, जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II, खंड 3, उपखंड (ii) में तारीख 11 जून, 1983 में प्रकाशित की गयी थी, द्वारा सक्षम प्राधिकारी नियुक्त किया है ।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची सिगोरीसिगोरीसिगोरीसिगोरी ओपनकास्टओपनकास्टओपनकास्टओपनकास्ट माईन (फे ज माईन (फे ज माईन (फे ज माईन (फे ज----II) ) ) ) नागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्र
िजला नागपुर िजला नागपुर िजला नागपुर िजला नागपुर ((((महाराष्ट्रमहाराष्ट्रमहाराष्ट्रमहाराष्ट्र)))) [[[[रेखांक संख्यारेखांक संख्यारेखांक संख्यारेखांक संख्या सी सी सी सी----1(1(1(1(ईईईई))))III/एफआर/944/एफआर/944/एफआर/944/एफआर/944---- 0319031903190319, , , , तारीखतारीखतारीखतारीख 11 मार्च11 मार्च11 मार्च11 मार्च,,,, 2019201920192019]]]]
सभी अिधकार : सभी अिधकार : सभी अिधकार : सभी अिधकार :
| bम स ं. | dाम का नाम | पटवारी सSकल स ंख् या | तहसील | िजला | क्ष ेत्रफल (हेक् टर में) | क ु ल | टिप्पणियां | ||
| िनजी | सरकारी | वन | |||||||
| 1. | सिगोरी | 12 | पारिशवनी | नागपुर | 39.24 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 39.70 | भाग |
| 2. | हिगना (बाराभाई) | 12 | पारिशवनी | नागपुर | 42.21 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 44.44 | भाग |
| क ु ल : | 81.45 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 84.14 |
या 207.91 एकड़ (लगभग)2950 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (1) dाम सिगोरी के अVजत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक :
52/1/अ– 52/1/ब- 52/2, 53/1- 53/2- 53/3- 53/4, 54/1- 54/2, 55, 56, 57/1- 57/2- 57/3, 58/1- 58/2- 58/3, 59/1/1- 59/2/ब, 60/1/ब- 60/2/ब- 60/3/अ, 61, 62, 63, 64/1- 64/2, 65, 66/1/1- 66/2/1, 68/1(भाग)- 68/2/ब- 68/3/2, 69, 70, 71/1, 74/1- 74/2- 74/3, 75/1- 75/2, 76/1- 76/2, 77(भाग), 78(भाग), 79/1/ब- 79/2/अ/2, 80/1(भाग), 81/1(भाग), 82/1(भाग), 83/1/1, 73 (भाग) (सरकारी भूिम)।
(2) dाम हिगना (बाराभाई) के अVजत किए जाने वाले प्लाट संख्यांक :
9/1- 9/2/1- 9/2/2- 9/2/3- 9/2/4, 10, 11/1- 11/2- 11/3, 204, 205/1, 206/1- 206/2, 207/1- 207/2/अ- 207/2/ब- 207/3/अ- 207/3/ब, 208, 209, 210, 211/1- 211/2, 212, 213, 214/1/अ- 214/2/अ, 215, 216, 217, 218/1/अ- 218/1/ब- 218/2- 218/3, 219, 220, 221/1- 221/2, 222, 223, 224/1, 228/1, 229/1, 231/1, 232/1- 232/2/अ, सड़क ।
(3) महाजेनको भूिम :
205/2, 214/1/ब- 214/2/ब, 224/2, 228/2, 229/2, 231/2, 232/2.।
सीमा वर्णन :
क – ख : रेखा dाम सिगोरी में प्रारंभिक बिन्दु 'क' से आरंभ होकर पूर्व दिशा से होती Wई dाम सिगोरी एवं हिगना की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा से लगकर गुजरती है फिर dाम हिगना से लगकर होती Wई कfची सड़क को पार कर डोरली नाला के पश्चिम तट पर स्थित बिन्दु 'ख' पर िमलती है ।
ख – ग : रेखा बिन्दु 'ख' से आरंभ होकर दक्षिण-पूर्व दिशा से होती Wई डोरली नाला के पश्िचम तट से गुजरती है और डोरली नाला के पश्चिम तट पर dाम हिगना एवं dाम डोरली की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा के निकट स्थित बिन्दु 'ग' पर िमलती है।
ग - घ : रेखा बिन्दु 'ग' से आरंभ होकर दक्षिण-पश्चिम दिशा से होती Wई डोरली नाले के पश्चिम तट से होकर dाम हिगना एवं dाम डोरली की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा से होती Wई, dाम हिगना, डोरली एवं सिगोरी की dाम सीमा त्रि-संगम पर बिन्दु 'घ' पर िमलती है ।
घ - ड. : रेखा dाम हिगना, डोरली एवं सिगोरी की dाम सीमा संगम पर स्थित बिन्दु 'घ' से आरंभ होकर उत्तर- पश्चिम दिशा से होती Wई सिगोरी ओपनकास्ट माईन के लिये पूर्व अधिdहीत भूमि की बाg सीमा से होती Wई तथा dाम हिगना एवं dाम सिगोरी की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा से लगकर होती Wई dाम सिगोरी में नाले को पार करती है फिर पश्चिम दिशा से होती Wई dाम सिगोरी में बिन्दु 'ड.' पर िमलती है ।
ड. – क : रेखा dाम सिगोरी में बिन्दु 'ड.' से आरंभ होकर उत्तर दिशा से होती Wई dाम सिगोरी में स्थित आरंिभक बिन्दु 'क' पर समाप्त होती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/10/2018 – एलए एPड आईआर]
राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2019
S.O. 764.—Whereas by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 1354, dated the 10th September, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas ( Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 15th September, 2018, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to prospect for coal in 84.14 hectares (approximately) or 207.91 acres (approximately) of the land in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;
And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that coal is obtainable in a part of the said lands specified in the Schedule appended hereto.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2951Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby gives notice of its intention to acquire all rights in or over the land measuring 84.14 hectares (approximately) or 207.91 acres (approximately) described in the Schedule appended hereto:
of the area covered by this notification may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Nagpur (Maharashtra) or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 or in the office of the General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited (Revenue Department), Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440 001 (Maharashtra).
Note 2: Attention is hereby invited to the provisions of section 8 of the aforesaid Act which provides as follows:-
"8 Objections to acquisition.- (1) Any person interested in any land in respect of which a notification under section 7 has been issued, may, within thirty days of the issue of this notification, object to the acquisition of the whole or any part of the land or of any rights in or over such land.
Explanation.- It shall not be an objection within the meaning of this section for any person to say that he himself desires to undertake mining operations in the land for the production of coal and that such operations should not be undertaken by the Central Government or by any other person.
(2) Every objection under sub-section (1) shall be made to the competent authority in writing and the competent authority shall give the objector an opportunity of being heard either in person or by a legal practitioner and shall, after hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry, if any, as he thinks necessary, either make a report in respect of the land which has been notified under sub-section (1) of section 7 or of rights in or over such land, or make different reports in respect of different parcels of such land or of rights in or over such land, to the Central Government, containing his recommendations on the objections, together with the record of proceedings held by him, for the decision of that Government.
(3) For the purpose of this section, a person shall be deemed to be interested in land who would be entitled to claim an interest in compensation if the land or any rights in or over such land were acquired under this Act."
Note 3: The Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata - 700 001 has been appointed by the Central Government as the competent authority under section 3 of the said Act, vide notification number S. O. 2519, dated the 27th May, 1983, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India, dated the 11th June, 1983.
SCHEDULE
Singori Opencast Mine (Phase II)
Nagpur Area
District Nagpur (Maharashtra)
[ Plan bearing number C-1(E)III/FR/944- 0319, dated the 11th March, 2019 ]
All Rights :
| Sl. No. | Name of Village | Patwari Circle number | Tahsil | District | Area (In hectares) | Total | Remarks | ||
| Tenancy | Govt. | Forest | |||||||
| 1. | Singori | 12 | Parsheoni | Nagpur | 39.24 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 39.70 | Part |
| 2. Hingna | (Barabhai) | 12 | Parsheoni | Nagpur | 42.21 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 44.44 | Part |
| Total : | 81.45 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 84.14 | - |
Total Area : 84.14 hectares (approximately)
or 207.91 acres (approximately)2952 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] (1) Plot numbers to be acquired in village Singori :
52/1/A – 52/1/B- 52/2, 53-1- 53/2- 53/3- 53/4, 54/1- 54/2, 55, 56, 57/1- 57/2- 57/3, 58/1- 58/2- 58/3, 59/1/1- 59/2/B, 60/1/B- 60/2/B- 60/3/A, 61, 62, 63, 64/1- 64/2, 65, 66/1/1- 66/2/1, 68/1 (Part)- 68/2/B- 68/3/2, 69, 70, 71/1, 74/1- 74/2- 74/3, 75/1- 75/2, 76/1- 76/2, 77 (Part), 78 (Part), 79/1/B- 79/2/A/2, 80/1 (Part), 81/1 (Part), 82/1 (Part), 83/1/1, 73 (Part) (Government land).
(2) Plot numbers to be acquired in village Hingna (Barabhai):
9/1- 9/2/1- 9/2/2- 9/2/3- 9/2/4, 10, 11/1- 11/2- 11/3, 204, 205/1, 206/1- 206/2, 207/1- 207/2/A- 207/2/B- 207/3/A- 207/3/B, 208, 209, 210, 211/1- 211/2, 212, 213, 214/1/A- 214/2/A, 215, 216, 217, 218/1/A- 218/1/B- 218/2- 218/3, 219, 220, 221/1- 221/2, 222, 223, 224/1, 228/1, 229/1, 231/1, 232/1- 232/2/A, Road.
(3) MAHAGENCO Land :
205/2, 214/1/B- 214/2/B, 224/2, 228/2, 229/2, 231/2, 232/2/B.
Boundary description:
A – B : Line starts from Point 'A' in village Singori and passes towards East, touches common village boundary of Singori and Hingna villages and goes along the boundary. Then line enters in village Hingna and travels in the South-East direction and touches Kacha Road then passes towards East along the South side of Kaccha Road, crosses Kaccha Road and meets at Point 'B' at the Western side of Dorli Nallah in village Hingna.
B – C : Line starts from Point 'B' and passes towards South-East direction along the West side of Dorli Nallah and meets at Point 'C' on the Western side of Dorli Nallah near common village boundary of Hingna and Dorli villages.
C – D : Line starts from Point 'C' and passes in South-West direction along the Western boundary of Dorli Nallah along side of common village boundary of Hingna village and Dorli village and meets near tri-junction Point 'D' of common village boundary of Hingna village, Dorli village and Singori village.
D – E : Line starts from Point 'D' near Tri-junction point of common village boundary of Hingna village, Dorli village and Singori village and passes towards North-West direction along the outer boundary of already acquired land of Singori Opencast Mine as well as along the common village boundary of Hingna village and Singori village, enters in Singori village, crosses nallah and passes in North-West direction and meets at Point 'E' in Singori village.
E – A : Line starts from Point 'E' and passes along North direction in Singori village and ends at starting Point 'A' in Singori village.
[ F. No. 43015/10/2018- LA&IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 15 मई , 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. . . . 765765765765....—कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 9 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी, भारत के राजपत्र, भाग II, खंड 3, उप-खंड (ii), तारीख 9 मार्च, 2019 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्यांक का.आ. 322, तारीख 5 मार्च, 2019 के प्रकाशन पर उक्त अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वXणत भूमि और ऐसी भूमि, (िजसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त भूिम कहा गया है), में या उस पर के सभी अिधकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 10 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर, आत्यंतिक रूप में के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार में निहित हो गए है;
और, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार का यह समाधान हो गया है कि साउथ ईस्टर्न कोलफील्\स लिमिटेड, सीपत रोड, पोस्ट बाक्स संख्या 60, िजला िबलासपुर-495006, छत्तीसगढ़ (जिसे इसमें इसके पlात् सरकारी कं पनी कहा गया है), ऐसे निबंधनों और शतm का जिन्हें के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार इस निमित्त अधिरोपित करना उचित समझे, अनुपालन करने के िलए रजामंद है ।
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2953अतः, अब, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 11 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Wए, यह िनदेश देती है कि इस प्रकार निहित उक्त 427.993 हेक्टेयर (लगभग) या 1057.57 एकड़ (लगभग) भूिम में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार में इस प्रकार निहित बने रहने के बजाए, तारीख 9 मार्च, 2019 से निम्नलिखित निबंधनों और शतm के अधीन रहते Wए सरकारी कं पनी में िनिहत हो जाएंगे, अर्थात:-
(1) सरकारी कं पनी उक्त अधिनियम के उपबंधों और अन्य सुसंगत विधि के अधीन यथा अवधारित प्रतिकर, ब्याज, नुकसानियों आदि से संबंिधत और वैसी ही मदों की बाबत् सभी संदाय करेगी ;
(2) सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा शर्त (1) के अधीन, संदेय रकमों का अवधारण करने के प्रयोजनों के लिए उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 14 के अधीन एक अिधकरण का गठन किया जाएगा और ऐसे किसी अधिकरण और उक्त अिधकरण की सहायता करने के लिए नियुक्त sक्तियों के संबंध में उपगत सभी sय, उक्त सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे और इसी प्रकार, निहित उक्त भूमियों में या उस पर के अधिकारों के िलए या उनके संबंध में अपील आदि विधिक कार्यवाहियों की बाबत उपगत सभी sय भी सरकारी कं पनी द्वारा वहन किए जाएंगे ;
(3) सरकारी कं पनी, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों की ऐसे किसी अन्य sय के संबंध में क्षतिपूVत करेगी जो इस प्रकार निहित उक्त भूमि में पूवtक्त अधिकारों के बारे में के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार या उसके पदधारियों द्वारा या उनके विLR किन्हa कार्यवाहियों के संबंध में आवश्यक हो ;
(4) सरकारी कं पनी के पास के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार के पूर्व अनुमोदन के बिना, उक्त भूमि में इस प्रकार निहित पूवtक्त अधिकारों को किसी अन्य sक्ति को अंतरित करने की शक्ति नहa होगी; और
(5) सरकारी कं पनी, ऐसे निदेशों और शतm का पालन करेगी, जो के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार द्वारा, जब कभी आवश्यक हो, उक्त भूमि के विशिष्ट क्षेत्रों के लिए दिये जाएं या अधिरोपित किए जाएं।
[फा. सं. 43015/41/2017-एलए एPड आईआर]
राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2019
S.O. 765.—Whereas on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal, number S.O. 322, dated the 5th March, 2019 published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 9th March, 2019 issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the land and all the rights in or over the land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said Act;
And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, P. B. No. 60, District Bilaspur – 495006, Chhattisgarh (hereinafter referred to as the Government company) is willing to comply with such terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the land measuring 427.993 hectares (approximately) or 1057.57 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said land so vested, shall with effect from the 9th March, 2019, instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government, vest in the Government company, subject to the following terms and conditions, namely:-
(1) the Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages, etc. and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant laws;
(2) a Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts payable to the Central Government by the Government company under condition (1) and all expenditure incurred in connection with such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal including all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings, and appeals, if any, for or in connection with the rights in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the Government company;
(3) the Government company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said land so vested;
2954 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](4) the Government company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said land so vested, to any other person without the prior approval of the Central Government; and
(5) the Government company shall abide by such direction and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said land as and when necessary.
[F. No. 43015/ 41/ 2017 – LA & IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 15 मई, 2019
का.आ. 766.—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार ने कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और विकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 7 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी भारत सरकार के कोयला मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का. आ. 2484, तारीख 16 अक्टूबर, 2017 द्वारा जो भारत के राजपत्र, भाग ।।, खPड 3, उप-खPड (ii), तारीख 21 अक्टूबर, 2017 में प्रकाशित की गई थी, उस अधिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा विनिSदष्ट परिक्षेत्र में 184.29 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 455.38 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकारों के अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की सूचना दी थी;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 8 के अनुसरण में के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है ;
और के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार का, पूवtक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात् और महाराष्ट्र सरकार से परामर्श करने के पश्चात् यह समाधान हो गया है, कि इसे संलग्न अनुसूची में यथा वXणत 71.77 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 177.34 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि और ऐसी भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार अVजत किए जाने चाहिए ।
अत:, अब, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, कोयला धारक क्षेत्र (अर्जन और िवकास) अिधिनयम, 1957 (1957 का 20) की धारा 9 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Wए यह घोषणा करती है कि, अनुसूची में यथा वXणत 71.77 हेक्टर (लगभग) या 177.34 एकड़ (लगभग) माप वाली भूमि में या उस पर के सभी अधिकार अVजत किए जाते हैं।
इस अधिसूचना के अंतर्गत आने वाले क्षेत्र के रेखांक संख्या सी-I(ई)/III/एफआर/945-0319, तारीख 13 मार्च, 2019 का निरीक्षण कलेक्टर, िजला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र) के कार्यालय में या कोयला नियंत्रक, 1, काउं सिल हाउस स्ट्रीट, कोलकाता - 700 001 के कार्यालय में या महाप्रबंधक, वेस्टर्न कोलफील्\स िलिमटेड (राजस्व िवभाग), कोल एस्टेट, सिविल लाइन्स, नागपुर - 440 001, महाराष्ट्र के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है।
अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
इंदर यूजी से ओसी विस्ताइंदर यूजी से ओसी विस्ताइंदर यूजी से ओसी विस्ताइंदर यूजी से ओसी विस्तार खानर खानर खानर खान
नागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्रनागपुर क्षेत्र
जिला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्रजिला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्रजिला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्रजिला नागपुर (महाराष्ट्र) ) ) )
((((रेखांक रेखांक रेखांक रेखांक संख्यासंख्यासंख्यासंख्या सीसीसीसी----I(I(I(I(ईईईई)/III)/III)/III)/III////एफआर/945एफआर/945एफआर/945एफआर/945----0319031903190319,,,, तारीख 13 मार्चतारीख 13 मार्चतारीख 13 मार्चतारीख 13 मार्च,,,, 2019201920192019))))
सभी अिधकार सभी अिधकार सभी अिधकार सभी अिधकार
| b. स ं. | dाम का नाम | पटवारी सSकल स ंख् या | तहसील | िजला | क्ष ेत्र (हेक्टेयर में) | टिप् पणी | ||
| िनजी | सरकारी | क ु ल | ||||||
| 1 | ट ेकाडी | 14 | पारिसवनी | नागपुर | 27.45 | 0.00 | 27.45 | भाग |
| 2 | गोंडेगांव | 13 | पारिसवनी | नागपुर | 41.70 | 2.62 | 44.32 | भाग |
कु ल क्षेत्र : 71.77 हेक्टेयर (लगभग)
या 177.34 एकड़ (लगभग)[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2955 (1) dाम टेकाडी के अVजत किए गए प्लाट संख्यांक :
614/1- 614/1/ब- 614/2- 614/2/ब- 614/2/क, 615/1/अ- 615/1/ब- 615/1/क- 615/2/अ- 615/2/ब, 616/1- 616/2- 616/3- 616/4, 617/1- 617/1/ब- 617/2, 618/1- 618/1/ब- 618/2- 618/2/ब, 619, 620/1- 620/2- 620/3.
(2) dाम गोंडेगांव के अVजत किए गए प्लाट संख्यांक :
183/1/1- 183/2अ- 183/2ब- 183/3/1- 183/3/2- 183/3/3- 183/4- 183/5, 189, 190/1- 190/2, 221/1, 186/1/1- 186/1/2- 186/2/1- 186/2/2- 186/2/3- 186/3/अ- 186/3/ब, 187/1- 187/2अ- 187/2ब- 187/3अ- 187/3ब, 200/1- 200/2- 200/3- 200/4- 200/5- 200/6- 200/7, 214/1- 214/2, 217/1- 217/2, 236/1/अ- 236/1ब- 236/2- 236/3- 236/4, 237/1- 237/2, सड़क.
सीमा वर्णन :
क-ख-ग : रेखा dाम गोंडेगांव में आरंभिक बिन्दु 'क' से प्रारंभ होकर, पूर्व दिशा में प्लाट संख्या 236 के साथ-साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'ख' से होकर प्रत्यक्ष खरीद द्वारा अधिdहित भूमि की बाg सीमा से होती Wई बिन्दु 'ग' पर िमलती है ।
ग – घ : रेखा उत्तर पूर्व दिशा से होकर सड़क की पश्चिम दिशा के साथ-साथ होती Wई उत्तर दिशा में बिन्दु 'घ' पर िमलती है ।
घ-ड.-च : रेखा पूर्व दिशा से होती Wई बिन्दु 'ड.' से होकर सड़क पार करती है । प्रत्यक्ष bय के माध्यम से अधिdहीत भूमि की सीमा के साथ-साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'च' पर िमलती है ।
च-छ-ज : रेखा बिन्दु 'छ' से पूर्व दिशा से होती Wई उत्तर दिशा में गोंडेगांव और dाम टेकाडी की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा के साथ-साथ होती Wई और dाम टेकाडी और dाम गोंडेगांव की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा पर बिन्दु 'ज' पर िमलती है ।
ज-झ-'अ´ : रेखा dाम टेकाडी एवं dाम गोंडेगांव की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा पर स्थित बिन्दु 'ज' से आरंभ होती है और पूर्व दिशा से होकर उत्तर दिशा में प्लाट संख्या 618 के साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'झ' से होकर प्लाट संख्या 620 के साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'स´' पर िमलती है ।
´-ट-ठ : रेखा बिन्दु 'अ' से होती है और सड़क की पश्चिमी दिशा के साथ दक्षिण दिशा से होती Wई dाम टेकाडी, गोंडेगांव और पिपरी dाम सीमा के त्रि-संगम पर स्थित बिन्दु 'ट' से होकर dाम टेकाड़ी एवं पिपरी की सम्मिलित dाम सीमा के साथ होती Wई सीमा पर स्थित बिन्दु 'ठ' पर िमलती है ।
ठ-ड-ढ़-ण: रेखा बिन्दु 'ठ' से होकर उत्तर पश्चिमी दिशा से होती Wई प्लाट संख्या 200/1 की बाg सीमा के साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'ड' एवं बिन्दु 'ढ़' से होकर पश्चिमी दिशा से होती Wई बिन्दु 'ण' पर िमलती है ।
ण-त-थ-द: रेखा बिन्दु 'ण' से आरंभ होकर उत्तर पश्चिमी दिशा से होती Wई प्लाट संख्या 187 के साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'त' एवं पlिमी दिशा में बिन्दु 'थ' से होकर गुजरती है और बिन्दु 'द' पर िमलती है ।
द-ध-न-प: रेखा बिन्दु 'द' से आरंभ होकर पश्चिमी दिशा से होती Wई सड़क से पूर्व दिशा पर बिन्दु 'ध' से होती Wई सड़क की पूर्वी दिशा के साथ दक्षिण दिशा से होकर बिन्दु 'न' पर मिलती है और सड़क पार करके पश्चिमी दिशा से होती Wई बिन्दु 'प' पर िमलती है ।
प-फ-ब-भ: रेखा बिन्दु 'प' से आरंभ होकर पश्चिम दिशा में प्लाट संख्या 214 के साथ होती Wई बिन्दु 'फ' और बिन्दु 'ब' से होकर बिन्दु 'भ' पर िमलती है ।
भ-म-य-क: रेखा बिन्दु 'भ' से आरंभ होकर प्लाट संख्यांक 237/1- 237/2 की बाg सीमा के साथ-साथ उत्तर-पश्चिमी दिशा से होकर बिन्दु 'य' से होकर गुजरती है फिर उत्तर दिशा से होकर आरंभिक बिन्दु 'क' पर समाप्त होती है ।
[फा. सं. 43015/25/2016–एलए एPड आईआर]
राम िशरोमिण सरोज, उप सिचव2956 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 15th May, 2019
S.O. 766.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Coal number S.O. 2484, dated the 16th October, 2017 issued under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 21st October, 2017, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to acquire all rights in or over the lands measuring 184.29 hectares (approximately) or 455.38 acres (approximately) in the locality specified in the Schedule annexed to that notification ;
And whereas, the competent authority in pursuance of section 8 of the said Act, has made his report to the Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the report aforesaid and after consulting to the Government of Maharashtra, is satisfied that the lands measuring 71.77 hectares (approximately) or 177.34 acres (approximately) and all rights in or over such lands as described in the Schedule appended hereto, should be acquired.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, (20 of 1957) the Central Government hereby declares that all rights in or over the land measuring 71.77 hectares (approximately) or 177.34 acres (approximately) as described in the Schedule are hereby acquired.
The plan bearing number C-I(E)III/FR/945-0319, dated 13th March, 2019 of the area covered by this notification, may be inspected in the office of the Collector, District Nagpur, Maharashtra or in the office of the Coal Controller, 1, Council House Street, Kolkata -700 001 or in the office of the General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Revenue Department, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra.
SCHEDULE
Inder UG to OC Expansion Mine
Nagpur Area
District Nagpur (Maharashtra)
[Plan bearing number C-I(E)III/FR/945-0319, dated 13th March, 2019]
All Rights:
| Sl. No. | Name of Village | Patwari Circle number | Tahsil | District | Area (in hectares) | Remarks | ||
| Tenancy | Govt. | Total | ||||||
| 1. | Tekadi | 14 | Parseoni | Nagpur | 27.45 | 0.00 | 27.45 | Part |
| 2. | Gondegaon | 13 | Parseoni | Nagpur | 41.70 | 2.62 | 44.32 | Part |
Total Area : 71.77 hectares (approximately)
or 177.34 acres (approximately)
(1) Plot numbers acquired in village Tekadi :
614/1- 614/1/B- 614/2- 614/2/B- 614/2/C, 615/1/A- 615/1/B- 615/1/C- 615/2/A- 615/2/B, 616/1- 616/2- 616/3- 616/4, 617/1- 617/1/B- 617/2, 618/1- 618/1/B- 618/2- 618/2/B, 619, 620/1- 620/2- 620/3.
(2) Plot numbers acquired in village Gondegaon :
183/1/1- 183/2A- 183/2B- 183/3/1- 183/3/2- 183/3/3- 183/4- 183/5, 189, 190/1- 190/2, 221/1, 186/1/1- 186/1/2- 186/2/1- 186/2/2- 186/2/3- 186/3/A- 186/3/B, 187/1- 187/2A- 187/2B- 187/3A- 187/3B, 200/1-[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2957 200/2- 200/3- 200/4- 200/5- 200/6- 200/7, 214/1- 214/2, 217/1- 217/2, 236/1A- 236/1B- 236/2- 236/3- 236/4, 237/1- 237/2, Road.
Boundary description:
A-B-C : Line starts from point 'A' in village Gondegaon passes in east direction along the plot number 236 through point 'B' then passes along the outer boundary of land acquired through direct purchase and meets at point 'C'.
C – D : Line passes through north-east direction in passes along west side of the road in north direction and meets at point 'D'.
D-E-F : Line passes in east direction, crosses the road passes through Point 'E' then passes in south direction along the boundary of land acquired through direct purchase and meets at point 'F'.
F-G-H : Line passes in east direction to point 'G' then passes in north direction along the common village boundary of Gondegaon and Tekadi and meets at point 'H' on common village boundary of village Tekadi and village Gondegaon.
H-I-J : Line starts from point 'H' on common village boundary of village Tekadi and village Gondegaon passes in east direction, then passes along the plot number 618 in north direction passes through point 'I' along the plot number 620 and meets at point 'J'.
J-K-L : Line starts from point 'J', passes along west side of the road through Point 'K' on tri-junction of boundary of villages Tekadi, Gondegaon and Pimpri, crosses the road and meets at point 'L' on common village boundary of village Gondegaon and village Pimpri.
L-M-N-O: Line passes north-west direction through point 'M' and point 'N' along the outer boundary of plot number 200/1 then passes in west direction and meets at point 'O'.
O-P-Q-R : Line starts from point 'O' passes in north-west direction along the plot number 187, through point 'P' and point 'Q' then passes in west direction and meets at point 'R'.
R-S-T-U : Line passes in west direction passes through point 'S' on east side of the road in passes along east side of the road in south direction meets at point 'T' crosses the Road then passes in west direction and meets at point 'U'.
U-V-W-X : Line starts from point 'U' passes along the plot number 214 in west direction through point 'V' and point 'W' and meets at point 'X'.
X-Y-Z-A : Line starts from point 'X' passes in north-west direction along the outer boundary of plot number 237/1- 237/2, passes through point 'Y' in west direction then passes to point 'Z' in north direction and meets at starting point 'A' in village Gondegaon.
[F. No. 43015/25/2016-LA&IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
कारपोरेट काय(cid:10) मं(cid:13)ालय कारपोरेट काय(cid:10) मं(cid:13)ालय कारपोरेट काय(cid:10) मं(cid:13)ालय कारपोरेट काय(cid:10) मं(cid:13)ालय
(राजभाषा प्रभाग)(राजभाषा प्रभाग)(राजभाषा प्रभाग)(राजभाषा प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 29 अप्रैल, 2019
का.आका.आका.आका.आ....767767767767....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) िनयम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप िनयम (4) के अनुसरण में कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय के अंतर्गत निम्निलिखत कार्यालयों में 80% कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक Dान प्राप्त कर िलया है, उन्हें एतzारा अधिसूचित करती है:-
1. प्रादेशिक निदेशक (उत्तप्रादेशिक निदेशक (उत्तप्रादेशिक निदेशक (उत्तप्रादेशिक निदेशक (उत्तरररर----पश्चिपश्चिपश्चिपश्चिम क्षेत्र) का कार्यालयम क्षेत्र) का कार्यालयम क्षेत्र) का कार्यालयम क्षेत्र) का कार्यालय,,,,
आरओसीआरओसीआरओसीआरओसी भवनभवनभवनभवन,,,, रूपल पार्क सोसायटी के सामनेरूपल पार्क सोसायटी के सामनेरूपल पार्क सोसायटी के सामनेरूपल पार्क सोसायटी के सामने,,,,
अंकु र बस स्टाप के पीछे, अहमदाबाद-380013
2. शासकीय समापक,
कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय,2958 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] प्रथम तल, पुराना सीआईए भवन,
जीपीओ के सामने, कॉम्पस रेजीडेंसी एरिया, इंदौर
3. शासकीय समापक, जोधपुर,
कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय,
सी/ 6-7, पहला तल, रेसीडेंसी एरिया,
िसिवल लाइंस, जयपुर-302001
4. कं पनी रजिस्ट्राकं पनी रजिस्ट्राकं पनी रजिस्ट्राकं पनी रजिस्ट्रारररर----सहसहसहसह----शासकीय समापकशासकीय समापकशासकीय समापकशासकीय समापक,,,,
कारपोरेकारपोरेकारपोरेकारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालयट कार्य मंत्रालयट कार्य मंत्रालयट कार्य मंत्रालय,,,,
पहली मंिजलपहली मंिजलपहली मंिजलपहली मंिजल,,,, अशोक पिगले भवनअशोक पिगले भवनअशोक पिगले भवनअशोक पिगले भवन,,,,
नगर िनगमनगर िनगमनगर िनगमनगर िनगम,,,, नेहरू चौकनेहरू चौकनेहरू चौकनेहरू चौक, , , , िबलासपुरिबलासपुरिबलासपुरिबलासपुर----495001495001495001495001 छत्तीसगढछत्तीसगढछत्तीसगढछत्तीसगढ
5. शासकीय समापक,
कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय,नागपुर में स्थित उfच न्यायालय मुम्बई, न्यू सेbे टेरिएट बिल्डिग,
दूसरा तलदूसरा तलदूसरा तलदूसरा तल,,,,पूर्वी विगपूर्वी विगपूर्वी विगपूर्वी विग, , , , िसिवल लाइंसिसिवल लाइंसिसिवल लाइंसिसिवल लाइंस, , , , नागपुरनागपुरनागपुरनागपुर
6. कं पनी रिजस्ट्रार सह- शासकीय समापक,
कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय,कम्पनी लॉ भवन, ईडीसी कॉम्प्लेक्स,
प्लॉट संख्या-21, प{टू, पणजी, गोवा
7. कें (cid:11)ीय पंजीकरण कें (cid:11) (सीआरसी),
भारतीय कारपोरेट कार्य संस्थान परिसर,
प्लॉट नं. पी 6, 7, 8,
सेक्टर-5, आईएमटी मानेसर,
िजला-गुड़गांव (हरियाणा)-122050
8. राष्ट्रीय कम्पनी विधि अपीलीय अधिकरण
पं. दीनदयाल अन्त्योदय भवन,
सीजीओ कॉम्पलेक्स, लोधी रोड, नई दिल्ली-110003
9. राष्ट्रीय कं पनी िविध अिधकरण
ब्लॉक नं. 3, भूतल, छठा, सातवा व आठवां तल,
सीजीओ कॉम्लेक्स, लोधी रोड, नई दिल्ली-11003
10. भारतीय दिवाला और शोधन अक्षमता बोर्ड
7वां तल, मयूर भवन, शंकर माकT ट,
कनॉट सर्क स, नई दिल्ली -110001
11. विनिधानकर्ता शिक्षा एवं संरक्षा निधि प्राधिकरण
जीवन विहार बिल्डिजीवन विहार बिल्डिजीवन विहार बिल्डिजीवन विहार बिल्डिगगगग,,,,
भूिमभूिमभूिमभूिम तलतलतलतल,,,, पा(cid:3)लयामेंट स्ट्रीपा(cid:3)लयामेंट स्ट्रीपा(cid:3)लयामेंट स्ट्रीपा(cid:3)लयामेंट स्ट्रीटटटट,,,, नई दिल्लीनई दिल्लीनई दिल्लीनई दिल्ली----110001110001110001110001
12. महािनदेशक कारपोरेट कार्य का कार्यालय,
कारपोरेट कार्य मंत्रालय,
कोटा हाउस एनेक्स,1, शाहजहां रोड,
नई दिल्ली-110011.
[सं. ई. 11016/1/2010-रा.भा.नीित]
के . वी. आर. मूVत, संयुक्त सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2959
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
(OFFICIAL LANGUAGE DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 29th April, 2019
S.O. 767.—In pursuance of Sub Rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 the Central Government hereby notifies the following offices of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, whereof 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi –
1. Office of the Regional Derector (North-west Region)
ROC Bhawan, Infront of Rupal Park Society, Behind Ankur Bus Stop, Ahmedabad-380013.
2. Official Liquidator ,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, 1st Floor, Old CIA Building, Opp. GPO, Comps Residency Area, Indore.
3. Official Liquidator, Jodhpur
Ministry Of Corporate Affairs, C/6-7, 1st Floor, Residency Area, Civil Lines Jaipur- 302001.
4. ROC cum Official Liquidator Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Ist Floor, Ashok Pingley Bhawan, Municipal Corporation, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur - 495001, Chhattisgarh.
5. Official Liquidator ,
High Court Of Mumbai At Nagpur, New Secretariat Building, 2nd Floor, East Wing, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
6. ROC cum Official Liquidator Ministry of Corporate Affairs Company Law Bhawan, EDC Complex, Plot No.21, Patto, Panaji, Goa.
7. Central Registration Centre (CRC),
Central Corporate Work Centre Area, PloT N. P 6, 7, 8, Sector-5, IMT Manesar, Distt. Gurugram (Haryana)-122050.
8. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)
Pt. Deendayal Antyodaya Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.
9. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
Block No. 3, Ground, Sixth, 7th & 8th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.
10. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
7th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Shankar Market, Connaught Circus, New Delhi -110001.
11. Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA)
Jeewan Vihar Building, Ground Floor, Parliament Street New Delhi-110001.
12. Office of the Director General of Corporate Affairs,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kota House Annexe, 1, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi-110011.
[No. E.-11016/1/2010-Official Language Policy]
K. V. R. MURTY, Jt. Secy.
2960 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]वाणिज्यवाणिज्यवाणिज्यवाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय एवं उद्योग मंत्रालय
((((वाणिज्यवाणिज्यवाणिज्यवाणिज्य िवभाग िवभाग िवभाग िवभाग))))
नई दिल्ली, 6 मई, 2019
का.आका.आका.आका.आ. . . . 768768768768....—के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 के िनयम 10 के उप नियम (4) के अनुसरण में वाणिज्य विभाग के अंतर्गत आने वाले ईसीजीसी लिमिटेड के निम्नलिखित शाखा कार्यालयों को अिधसूिचत करती है, जिनके सभी अधिकारियों ने हिदी का कार्यसाधक Dान प्राप्त कर लिया है : -
1. ईसीजीसी िलिमटेड
रायपुर शाखा
तीसरी मंिजल, उद्योग भवन परिसर
(cid:129)रग रोड़ नं. 1, तेलीबांधा
रायपुर छत्तीसगढ़ – 492006
2. ईसीजीसी िलिमटेड
गि(cid:130)ट सिटी शाखा
आईएफएससी बीमा कार्यालय,
कार्यालय नं. 5, विग – 1
क्षेत्रीय सुविधा के न्(cid:11), ब्लाक 12,
रोड 1 डी, जोन – 1
गि(cid:130)ट एसईजेड, गि(cid:130)ट सिटी, गांधी नगर – 382355
[[[[फा. सं. 11012/2/2019-हिदी]
हरीश कु मार शर्मा, अपर महािनदेशक (पूVत)
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Department of Commerce)
New Delhi, the 6th May, 2019
S.O. 768.—In pursuance of the Sub - Rule (4) of the Rule 10 of the Official Language (Use for Official Purposes of Union) rules, 1976, The Central Govt., hereby notifies the following branch offices of ECGC Limited, Mumbai under Department of Commerce, whereof all the staff have acquired a working knowledge of Hindi: - 1. ECGC Limited Raipur Branch 3rd floor, Udyog Bhawan complex Ring road no. 1, Telibandha Raipur Chhattisgarh – 492006
2. ECGC Limited
Gift City Branch IFSC Insurance Office, Office no. 5, Wing - 1 Regional Facilitation Center, Block 12, Road 1D, zone-1 Gift SEZ, Gift City, Gandhi Nagar - 382355
[F. No. 11012/2/2019-Hindi]
HARISH KUMAR SHARMA, Addl. Director General (Supply)`[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2961 पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालयपेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली,,,, 8 मई,,,, 2019
का.आ.का.आ.का.आ.का.आ. 769769769769....————के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि मे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2845,,,, दिनांक 31 अक्टूबर 2017,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 23 दिसम्बर 2017 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, तथा अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1764, , , , दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर 2018,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 15 दिसम्बर 2018 को प्रकाशित की गई थीI इन अधिसूचनाओं में संल(cid:134) अनुसूची में वििनSदष्ट भूमि में झारखPड राज्य में, "हल्दिया----बरौनी पाइपलाइन सिस्टम्स परियोजना" के अंतर्गत, ज़िला देवघर में कfचे तेल के परिवहन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉपtरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी I
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 12 अक्टूबर 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,,,,
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है,,,,
और के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार ने,,,, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पlात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है,,,, उसमे उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने का विनिlय किया है;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Wए यह घोषणा करती है की इस अधिसूचना से संल(cid:134) अनुसूची में वििनSदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;;;;
और के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Wए,,,, यह निदTश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए,,,, सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपtरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी I
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइंन अिधिनयम,,,,1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूVत के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपtरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उतरदाई होगा और पाइपलाइन से संबन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:11)ीय सरकार के विLR कोई दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहa हो सके गी I
| अनुअनुअनुअनुसूसूसूसूचीचीचीची | |||||
| िजला : देवघर राज्य : झारखंड देवघर | |||||
| तहसील | गाँवगाँवगाँवगाँव | सवसवसवसव नम्बर नम्बर | क्षेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टेयर | एयर एयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
665 00 00 20 619 00 01 50 617 00 03 25 618 00 00 25 616 00 04 56 604 00 00 40 615 00 00 862962 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
330 00 01 17
341 00 01 04
337 00 02 15
336 00 01 64
335 00 00 20
334 00 03 61
332 00 00 65
333 00 02 51
328 00 01 20
323 00 01 19
322 00 02 05
322/1349 00 01 21
320 00 00 73
321 00 02 17
317 00 02 26
319 00 00 20
318 00 02 06
714 00 04 29
788 00 07 87
787 00 03 09
768 00 01 49
767 00 02 46
718 00 00 20
719 00 00 79
720 00 02 55
721 00 06 54
722 00 00 23
764 00 14 57
760 00 03 78
763 00 07 91
761 00 09 47
762 00 04 01
1154 00 15 68
9 00 12 74
8 00 01 08
पलोजोरी सटकी - 664 914 00 34 83
402 00 03 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2963
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
393 00 01 91
392 00 02 48
435 00 03 03
231 00 03 05
पलोजोरी वॉसनली - 684 795 00 05 00
495 00 20 64
787 00 01 11
140 00 52 23
139 00 05 27
पलोजोरी बेरवामारनी - 665 584 00 12 33
582 00 01 96
581 00 00 97
580 00 05 93
579 00 00 20
534 00 02 65
531 00 01 54
536 00 02 38
537 00 02 14
538 00 02 01
542 00 02 71
539 00 01 87
529 00 08 29
527 00 03 08
528 00 00 35
490 00 03 15
489 00 07 06
491 00 00 24
487 00 03 23
488 00 02 36
पलोजोरी हीरापुर - 663 561/569 00 00 44
487 00 06 38
488 00 02 05
486 00 00 23
485 00 02 62
483 00 14 36
2964 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
480 00 02 36
479 00 02 81
478 00 02 61
423 00 00 20
508 00 00 86
पलोजोरी घोडमारा - 662 446 00 00 62
450 00 01 50
452 00 01 42
454 00 01 71
453 00 03 11
460 00 00 50
461 00 22 16
471 00 00 20
470 00 05 86
463 00 02 48
467 00 02 20
464 00 04 32
409 00 02 36
410 00 01 93
411 00 01 81
412 00 03 77
413 00 04 17
414 00 01 70
334 00 00 66
37 00 01 67
38 00 01 65
39 00 01 55
40 00 01 47
41 00 02 15
42 00 02 30
43 00 02 70
45 00 02 08
46 00 01 81
48 00 02 41
49 00 00 20
59 00 02 08
58 00 00 61
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2965
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
63 00 00 67
64 00 11 90
67 00 01 21
68 00 02 37
69 00 02 99
71 00 03 23
7 00 04 23
पलोजोरी शीरामपूर - 660 1178 00 02 31
1171 00 01 42
1170 00 02 43
1169 00 21 82
1211 00 07 71
1212 00 00 20
1215 00 01 53
1214 00 12 21
981 00 02 98
948 00 04 44
898 00 23 52
933 00 00 85
934 00 04 55
921 00 03 81
935 00 03 03
937 00 00 23
936 00 01 44
924 00 01 98
927 00 00 43
941 00 15 96
943 00 00 60
पलोजोरी आमगाछी - 658 354 00 00 19
258 00 01 84
259 00 00 41
260 00 07 96
261 00 03 29
272 00 02 16
295 00 00 84
293 00 00 24
2966 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
299 00 02 00
180 00 08 00
178 00 00 20
179 00 00 42
535 00 12 89
185 00 05 67
183 00 03 13
166 00 01 17
165 00 01 19
140 00 01 65
164 00 01 15
163 00 00 68
162 00 01 54
158 00 02 75
159 00 03 70
157 00 04 71
151 00 01 48
152 00 06 11
155 00 00 20
537 00 00 20
153 00 01 46
82 00 04 19
91 00 08 36
79 00 00 66
78 00 00 31
75 00 02 31
72 00 00 20
65 00 05 51
पलोजोरी सीमला - 625 1587 00 00 20
1575 00 00 52
1574 00 05 95
1570 00 04 58
1568 00 03 20
1566 00 03 62
1560 00 03 24
1558 00 04 18
1545 00 02 84
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2967
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1503 00 02 100 1502 00 02 71 1501 00 00 62 1510 00 01 93 1498 00 02 44 1500 00 00 20 1499 00 01 80 1496 00 00 93 1495 00 01 49 1494 00 02 77 1493 00 01 14 1466 00 00 79 1464 00 02 68 1463 00 01 61 1461 00 01 86 1462 00 02 27 1459 00 04 32 1469 00 00 92 1458 00 00 36 1402 00 02 26 1401 00 06 00 1403 00 01 20 1409 00 00 63 1453 00 09 20 1417 00 04 09 1418 00 01 83 1419 00 19 88 1433 00 02 57 1424 00 00 78 1425 00 01 70 1340 00 01 69 1339 00 02 59 1338 00 00 20 1337 00 00 28 1336 00 01 91 1331 00 02 78 1323 00 05 39 1304 00 05 112968 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1305 00 00 85
1303 00 02 06
1296 00 08 35
1290 00 04 42
1291 00 01 81
1292 00 04 49
1293 00 03 17
1273 00 05 60
1270 00 01 19
पलोजोरी पहािडयापाडा - 623 156 00 01 17
153 00 08 25
157 00 06 05
152 00 02 22
150 00 06 85
151 00 00 45
149 00 04 43
106 00 00 51
10 00 01 75
108 00 05 53
107 00 00 20
4 00 12 49
3 00 00 31
पलोजोरी जगदीशपुर - 622 112 00 23 90
109 00 07 13
110 00 00 78
111 00 00 20
27 00 00 91
20 00 18 08
पलोजोरी िबशूनपुर - 620 111 00 08 43
102 00 06 39
96 00 01 60
95 00 05 41
94 00 01 62
93 00 02 87
90 00 03 18
पलोजोरी पथराबहाल - 464 174 00 00 45
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2969
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
168 00 09 77
126 00 00 20
125 00 00 90
127 00 05 60
130 00 00 20
131 00 01 18
119 00 06 05
118 00 02 38
115 00 01 70
117 00 03 20
116 00 01 79
183 00 00 20
102 00 01 11
103 00 00 20
101 00 00 20
66 00 01 60
100 00 00 27
68 00 02 22
99 00 00 20
69 00 01 74
70 00 04 57
71 00 01 53
72 00 02 04
57 00 00 20
73 00 01 47
56 00 05 60
53 00 06 62
55 00 01 55
52 00 00 41
पलोजोरी सरसा - 463 1381 00 00 37
1391 00 01 92
1394 00 04 81
1385 00 01 11
1390 00 00 77
1389 00 01 72
814 00 00 78
813 00 01 30
2970 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
पलोजोरी सालदाहा - 465 486 00 01 52
467 00 05 17
457 00 17 03
461 00 00 20
460 00 02 25
458 00 06 38
581 00 00 98
446 00 11 23
445 00 00 20
443 00 04 49
442 00 01 53
441 00 00 20
440 00 00 60
438 00 00 30
439 00 01 01
401 00 02 75
400 00 03 94
387 00 04 22
388 00 00 21
389 00 01 70
390 00 00 37
391 00 03 24
392 00 00 24
343 00 03 50
64 00 05 10
59 00 01 48
60 00 02 77
57 00 01 34
56 00 07 43
55 00 02 40
49 00 05 98
41 00 00 20
63 00 01 02
पलोजोरी रामजीबनपुर - 468 85 00 12 92
82 00 03 14
81 00 00 29
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2971
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
46 00 02 26
94 00 04 30
95 00 00 20
47 00 02 89
48 00 01 97
45 00 01 42
44 00 00 29
43 00 03 75
पलोजोरी भांगाहीड - 469 110 00 02 21
109 00 03 98
108 00 04 54
106 00 03 17
127 00 02 63
पलोजोरी खागा - 470 1366 00 03 12
1363 00 04 99
1361 00 00 20
1364 00 01 84
1358 00 07 51
1355 00 00 67
1354 00 00 20
1353 00 02 54
1352 00 00 64
1285 00 00 73
1350 00 00 88
1349 00 00 40
947 00 00 21
962 00 02 02
961 00 01 26
960 00 01 58
959 00 00 32
958 00 02 78
956 00 03 51
955 00 00 20
952 00 08 67
954 00 03 11
953 00 01 34
2972 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
814 00 00 50 813 00 00 59 818 00 00 69 815 00 02 05 816 00 00 90 786 00 01 05 807 00 00 76 806 00 00 20 787 00 00 20 788 00 02 19 789 00 01 86 790 00 01 95 791 00 01 07 793 00 00 20 730 00 02 66 729 00 00 58 694 00 19 63 695 00 03 59 621 00 04 37 620 00 03 00 618 00 03 20 617 00 02 86 1375 00 00 92 293 00 12 65 296 00 00 84 297 00 05 09 298 00 00 90 287 00 01 46 281 00 06 27 278 00 01 44 272 00 02 99 271 00 07 56 256/1382 00 00 48 256 00 03 98 257 00 01 04 251 00 01 06 258 00 00 32 250 00 05 14[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2973
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
246 00 02 79
पलोजोरी रघुवाडीह - 460 198 00 02 19
197 00 04 29
187 00 03 43
186 00 02 49
181 00 00 76
182 00 03 50
180 00 00 50
179 00 02 34
176 00 06 89
177 00 00 63
171 00 02 63
पलोजोरी सोनातर - 459 931 00 00 20
930 00 03 21
700 00 00 63
906 00 02 07
905 00 11 11
904 00 01 88
899 00 01 97
900 00 00 42
895 00 03 58
894 00 06 20
803 00 03 03
1041 00 01 80
802 00 03 24
799 00 06 84
800 00 05 02
796 00 07 08
798 00 00 49
791 00 05 03
781 00 31 64
पलोजोरी सीतल कू न्डी - 458 34 00 67 58
422 00 22 16
425 00 05 58
35 00 16 63
2974 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
25 00 02 90
448 00 02 83
18 00 03 95
19 00 00 20
17 00 07 12
23 00 09 73
14 00 02 63
13 00 00 20
1 00 01 47
पलोजोरी वीराजपुर - 440 2111 00 08 64
2110 00 00 20
2107 00 01 69
2106 00 02 64
2105 00 06 46
1994 00 17 75
पलोजोरी सीतलडीह चांदपुर - 457 790 00 12 75
429 00 01 07
420 00 00 49
428 00 01 90
427 00 04 13
426 00 04 19
422 00 00 20
423 00 00 61
424 00 02 84
425 00 02 98
393 00 00 04
394 00 03 46
417 00 00 20
395 00 02 32
396 00 02 09
397 00 05 22
399 00 06 27
398 00 00 20
404 00 08 54
पलोजोरी बरदहा - 456 1087 00 07 83
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2975
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1080 00 01 46
1079 00 04 99
1076 00 06 19
1041 00 00 74
1031 00 09 14
1030 00 02 30
895 00 01 37
905 00 02 72
907 00 03 11
904 00 00 28
908 00 05 71
593 00 01 00
793 00 01 54
795 00 07 74
794 00 00 33
588 00 19 81
590 00 18 34
591 00 06 38
142 00 00 20
1166 00 03 07
1165 00 00 20
136 00 06 43
135 00 03 63
134 00 00 40
124 00 15 74
125 00 00 20
62 00 01 25
100 00 00 20
72 00 04 28
68 00 03 35
66 00 02 36
67 00 04 35
47 00 00 20
48 00 03 36
1169 00 16 24
37 00 03 00
4 00 13 92
1 00 01 58
पलोजोरी फाराआम - 454 153 00 00 32
2976 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
149 00 16 48
150 00 00 92
148 00 03 81
147 00 02 55
124 00 02 11
118 00 02 22
117 00 00 20
119 00 01 30
120 00 02 01
122 00 05 69
पलोजोरी कोिडयाडीह - 453 1303 00 01 23
1302 00 01 87
1301 00 00 20
1300 00 02 69
1299 00 00 20
1297 00 05 63
1294 00 04 60
1293 00 04 43
1292 00 02 05
1248 00 01 20
1250 00 00 27
1249 00 01 70
1254 00 00 68
1255 00 03 19
1257 00 01 62
1256 00 05 30
1051 00 00 63
1052 00 04 25
1055 00 00 33
1031 00 06 04
1032 00 03 92
1030 00 02 02
1029 00 01 37
1028 00 00 38
1002 00 07 85
1003 00 02 97
981 00 07 78
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2977
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
971 00 02 77
969 00 00 35
968 00 02 33
967 00 01 13
961 00 00 58
962 00 02 64
963 00 01 25
958 00 01 10
1387 00 00 48
सारठ गोपलाराएडीह - 447 891 00 00 72
892 00 11 33
926 00 01 91
895 00 10 45
835 00 01 57
838 00 08 22
839 00 00 20
840 00 00 26
837 00 06 98
804 00 04 36
803 00 00 47
801 00 04 33
800 00 03 86
798 00 03 83
797 00 05 11
796 00 05 15
779 00 00 73
448 00 04 76
447 00 03 80
442 00 02 41
441 00 00 20
439 00 01 38
435 00 00 20
436 00 01 10
433 00 01 98
430 00 02 04
425 00 03 95
422 00 01 48
2978 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
414 00 00 71 417 00 01 61 380 - 02 21 381 00 01 51 382 00 00 97 383 00 01 87 362 00 01 54 384 00 02 20 361 00 01 34 270 00 07 29 269 00 04 37 260 00 00 61 259 00 00 56 253 00 00 53 275 00 03 06 276 00 05 61 277 00 01 13 281 00 03 17 283 00 02 75 284 00 04 06 291 00 03 81 235 00 00 20 292 00 03 12 293 00 01 00 231 00 03 77 225 00 00 42 226 00 02 70 224 00 04 91 223 00 06 28 213 00 02 21 214 00 03 33 215 00 03 98 216 00 03 05 168 00 10 42 169 00 07 19 32 00 15 04 33 00 06 03 46 00 00 20[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2979
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1 00 03 53
सारठ कचुआवांक - 224 1464 00 02 18
1492 00 02 03
1461 00 03 55
1451 00 00 83
1452 00 02 20
1455 00 00 79
1453 00 03 63
1447 00 02 41
1412 00 01 29
1410 00 00 81
1411 00 01 52
1409 00 00 20
1413 00 01 90
1414 00 03 07
1416 00 01 46
1393 00 06 46
1415 00 01 86
1392 00 00 74
1396 00 07 20
1336 00 12 96
1337 00 03 75
1361 00 13 86
1338 00 00 20
1348 00 00 34
1357 00 06 22
1356 00 05 24
1355 00 02 19
1353 00 01 15
735 00 01 93
1352 00 06 85
1524 00 00 42
1525 00 01 59
1526 00 00 90
733 00 03 60
सारठ ढोडोडुमर - 225 337 00 05 96
2980 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
300 00 03 09 295 00 00 20 299 00 02 69 297 00 00 30 298 00 00 70 292 00 00 20 263 00 00 65 264 00 00 84 265 00 01 58 266 00 10 74 267 00 02 07 268 00 01 47 272 00 05 78 273 00 00 20 214 00 00 20 213 00 01 39 211 00 01 95 209 00 01 38 208 00 01 23 207 00 01 50 195 00 01 87 194 00 02 41 193 00 02 53 192 00 01 90 191 00 03 09 189 00 01 95 643 00 14 31 184 00 01 33 72 00 01 24 73 00 00 20 77 00 00 20 76 00 01 62 74 00 01 87 75 00 04 30 89 00 00 87 88 00 02 68 87 00 03 48 27 00 01 29[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2981
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
15 00 03 11
13 00 01 05
7 00 07 43
4 00 01 25
5 00 01 59
सारठ गोपीवांध - 229 236 00 26 38
165 00 18 01
196 00 01 44
195 00 02 64
194 00 02 67
184 00 02 97
182 00 03 00
181 00 00 87
178 00 03 47
360 00 06 07
177 00 06 06
146 00 15 54
145 00 01 58
212 00 01 83
सारठ बरमिसया - 228 386 00 00 68
388 00 05 51
387 00 00 45
198 00 00 20
199 00 04 86
197 00 01 50
196 00 00 53
195 00 00 35
194 00 04 06
193 00 00 32
202 00 04 88
203 00 00 50
201 00 01 72
204 00 00 93
206 00 00 20
205 00 04 25
237 00 01 73
2982 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
241 00 01 46
242 00 00 36
244 00 00 21
243 00 01 56
137 00 02 23
132 00 01 63
133 00 00 73
130 00 00 20
134 00 02 02
135 00 00 44
129 00 02 42
128 00 02 67
सारठ फािसयावाद - 227 320 00 01 38
318 00 00 27
सारठ दरोिहया - 232 26 00 05 78
8 00 02 40
7 00 03 94
10 00 01 61
11 00 09 54
13 00 10 62
14 00 01 53
17 00 13 50
15 00 00 20
3 00 05 45
1 00 02 51
सारठ महेशिलटी - 233 273 00 03 29
252 00 01 20
246 00 02 22
251 00 00 20
250 00 02 52
249 00 01 57
248 00 02 36
147 00 03 89
144 00 00 75
145 00 02 55
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2983
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
153 00 00 92
154 00 01 63
155 00 00 20
161 00 00 70
159 00 00 20
160 00 01 75
163 00 00 64
158 00 00 58
121 00 00 78
25 00 00 20
24 00 01 87
22 00 01 75
21 00 00 30
23 00 00 20
19 00 01 40
18 00 06 04
सारठ पारवांक - 235 208 00 00 45
166 00 00 40
167 00 02 18
204 00 00 41
168 00 02 13
169 00 04 94
181 00 03 60
180 00 02 06
123 00 00 91
88 00 01 29
87 00 04 86
82 00 01 54
80 00 02 42
38 00 05 63
36 00 02 08
39 00 03 49
1 00 03 81
सारठ कु मडाबान्दी - 237 287 00 03 59
259 00 03 20
260 00 00 75
2984 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
262 00 01 45
243 00 05 50
244 00 11 24
241 00 02 51
194 00 00 72
193 00 02 05
सारठ देउली - 238 585 00 07 16
581 00 00 32
580 00 06 49
578 00 01 88
577 00 01 47
576 00 00 20
575 00 00 31
574 00 06 43
573 00 02 43
569 00 08 30
568 00 03 09
527 00 03 55
526 00 07 11
521 00 03 28
525 00 00 20
509 00 06 98
507 00 01 10
508 00 00 96
122 00 00 54
31 00 08 66
30 00 03 22
29 00 01 39
46 00 01 21
47 00 05 55
18 00 02 69
49 00 07 84
50 00 01 94
51 00 07 59
सारठ जोगियाटिकर - 239 50 00 03 12
49 00 05 43
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2985
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
42 00 04 06
37 00 03 07
35 00 03 52
34 00 02 74
27 00 00 83
सारठ सबइजोर - 240 157 00 00 36
158 00 00 46
159 00 00 32
156 00 02 61
155 00 05 64
164 00 06 02
154 00 02 77
151 00 00 20
153 00 10 95
152 00 01 79
137 00 02 36
138 00 00 20
145 00 05 63
146 00 00 55
122 00 02 02
121 00 00 21
123 00 04 71
116 00 14 58
110 00 00 20
59 00 10 11
60 00 00 20
61 00 02 94
66 00 25 52
62 00 04 85
78 00 09 46
79 00 05 25
80 00 08 92
81 00 02 50
56 00 02 57
6 00 29 10
5 00 15 15
1 00 31 17
सारठ कोडा़डीह - 243 5 00 06 08
2986 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
सरवां कोडा़डीह - 240 273 00 05 20
97 00 03 95
सरवां बन्दाजोरी - 241 934 00 09 66
930 00 05 30
929 00 03 88
933 00 00 20
833 00 24 30
835 00 05 15
975 00 01 17
834 00 06 06
832 00 04 53
830 00 01 69
968 00 07 40
974 00 02 52
811 00 08 12
804 00 01 39
803 00 00 20
805 00 02 30
789 00 04 71
790 00 01 24
793 00 02 35
794 00 00 46
761 00 09 74
763 00 00 29
762 00 01 07
616 00 05 31
617 00 04 61
618 00 00 47
633 00 01 17
186 00 00 20
185 00 03 14
184 00 04 69
190 00 04 11
183 00 02 02
182 00 02 63
181 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2987
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
68 00 00 20
174 00 02 51
70 00 02 65
71 00 02 64
75 00 01 60
74 00 00 84
77 00 00 20
78 00 01 54
79 00 05 37
164 00 01 44
162 00 01 17
158 00 07 72
155 00 03 99
154 00 04 56
132 00 00 63
284 00 02 91
283 00 05 02
285 00 03 34
288 00 07 35
286 00 00 20
289 00 01 90
292 00 03 45
291 00 00 27
303 00 06 02
302 00 00 61
301 00 01 30
950 00 01 32
300 00 00 37
304 00 00 43
3 00 00 20
2 00 06 43
1 00 02 92
सरवां सीरसा - 228 124 00 04 26
128 00 02 45
127 00 03 38
129 00 04 94
131 00 07 84
2988 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
143 00 11 44
144 00 11 06
145 00 00 20
123 00 01 52
20 00 17 38
55 00 04 71
53 00 05 66
52 00 01 69
19 00 03 33
18 00 05 52
17 00 06 04
16 00 04 67
15 00 04 43
12 00 02 70
13 00 00 38
10 00 01 96
सरवां जोगियाटिकर - 243 227 00 02 50
228 00 02 25
230 00 01 61
229 00 02 44
224 00 02 35
214 00 03 73
213 00 01 49
212 00 04 62
211 00 00 24
34 00 15 91
33 00 15 72
32 00 05 43
8 00 23 92
350 00 06 90
349 00 03 86
348 00 03 91
22 00 04 17
343 00 04 56
344 00 04 91
345 00 05 17
346 00 05 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2989
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
सरवां बाघमारी - 223 195 00 00 32
153 00 02 01
154 00 00 20
152 00 06 49
151 00 01 84
148 00 00 20
146 00 02 56
127 00 01 36
128 00 01 31
134 00 01 65
131 00 06 83
83 00 01 10
38 00 04 90
39 00 03 61
34 00 00 40
40 00 05 63
32 00 01 55
31 00 02 18
30 00 02 76
सरवां कु िसआवॉक -222 87 00 00 70
86 00 02 95
85 00 02 57
84 00 02 48
68 00 00 38
66 00 03 67
67 00 03 27
59 00 04 52
58 00 01 72
57 00 01 01
56 00 00 36
सरवां बेला - 171 170 00 03 15
171 00 01 02
167 00 01 29
166 00 03 42
168 00 00 20
2990 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
146 00 00 20
145 00 03 11
147 00 01 74
138 00 00 20
137 00 05 21
148 00 00 20
135 00 03 50
136 00 00 81
134 00 01 28
129 00 01 47
122 00 06 96
121 00 02 98
124 00 00 83
123 00 00 63
101 00 01 66
102 00 03 66
103 00 03 95
104 00 02 07
82 00 05 48
सरवां डांगा - 172 63 00 10 13
66 00 16 21
67 00 11 96
34 00 00 82
37 00 05 23
40 00 06 08
38 00 00 50
30 00 03 28
28 00 04 34
27 00 02 94
15 00 01 13
21 00 01 40
17 00 04 93
20 00 00 24
19 00 04 92
3 00 07 89
सरवां सूरसूरा - 220 121 00 01 09
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2991
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
102 00 00 20
101 00 05 24
95 00 00 20
96 00 03 51
97 00 01 35
93 00 03 01
92 00 01 19
सरवां ठाड़ी - 219 370 00 00 37
366 00 04 81
367 00 04 01
364 00 02 56
362 00 05 13
314 00 02 84
316 00 02 33
317 00 07 77
321 00 01 67
320 00 00 20
322 00 02 21
324 00 02 10
323 00 02 41
325 00 01 80
327 00 06 45
326 00 02 25
266 00 00 32
264 00 03 09
246 00 08 16
247 00 00 27
245 00 04 09
240 00 08 28
237 00 05 26
235 00 04 54
134 00 07 82
136 00 01 02
144 00 07 83
145 00 00 20
15 00 09 87
13 00 00 20
2992 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
9 00 01 16
7 00 04 19
1 00 00 56
सरवां िपछी - 175 855 00 00 24
839 00 00 59
838 00 03 20
837 00 02 44
836 00 02 62
835 00 01 80
834 00 02 18
833 00 00 76
832 00 01 08
831 00 18 81
270 00 01 27
267 00 00 20
266 00 03 81
265 00 03 74
264 00 01 52
263 00 02 18
260 00 03 19
259 00 05 10
257 00 00 87
256 00 05 48
254 00 01 90
252 00 01 65
251 00 01 61
250 00 01 36
94 00 00 98
95 00 02 35
96 00 00 99
92 00 01 48
97 00 00 75
98 00 03 26
100 00 00 20
99 00 00 80
84 00 01 84
66 00 02 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2993
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
71 00 00 64
50 00 00 97
515 00 02 87
सरवां उपरबानधी - 176 22 00 02 77
20 00 00 20
21 00 02 49
10 00 03 55
11 00 00 36
9 00 03 68
12 00 00 20
8 00 01 83
6 00 01 57
5 00 01 74
3 00 03 65
4 00 00 54
1 00 02 85
सरवां नोिखला - 144 1131 00 04 32
417 00 02 49
414 00 04 17
374 00 00 71
375 00 02 62
377 00 00 42
376 00 01 92
373 00 00 20
372 00 04 10
371 00 01 40
378 00 03 44
362 00 01 73
363 00 00 78
367 00 00 66
365 00 00 61
364 00 01 27
358 00 00 20
357 00 00 27
356 00 00 34
355 00 03 35
2994 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
320 00 00 20
321 00 06 67
323 00 00 53
322 00 09 13
209 00 03 73
212 00 06 44
215 00 00 42
136 00 04 63
137 00 01 31
138 00 05 99
120 00 03 94
121 00 01 61
116 00 00 28
115 00 02 26
117 00 07 57
72 00 03 69
73 00 01 29
74 00 00 20
69 00 00 57
76 00 01 98
77 00 01 86
78 00 00 20
58 00 00 63
61 00 01 24
60 00 02 29
59 00 00 45
62 00 03 25
63 00 01 13
53 00 02 47
सरवां वागीचा - 141 182 00 01 33
175 00 08 95
181 00 00 20
180 00 01 59
178 00 00 24
179 00 02 87
183 00 00 20
164 00 04 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2995
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
154 00 00 20
सरवां नोिखला िछट – 140 1169 00 01 34
1171 00 00 54
1170 00 02 62
1172 00 03 28
1173 00 01 63
1177 00 01 20
1175 00 03 55
1159 00 00 52
1158 00 02 84
1157 00 01 26
सरवां सोभासाडी - 139 50 00 00 43
49 00 04 65
46 00 02 13
23 00 03 51
45 00 00 25
44 00 01 82
34 00 08 14
30 00 01 94
32 00 02 03
33 00 00 35
2 00 05 67
सरवां तोलयाडीह – 138 4 00 08 45
सरवां लशकरडीह - 133 738 00 04 23
694 00 02 72
736 00 04 07
735 00 02 66
661 00 05 83
663 00 00 20
662 00 06 84
658 00 00 20
657 00 00 99
305 00 00 47
306 00 01 07
2996 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
310 00 01 13 311 00 02 26 312 00 07 44 314 00 02 25 315 00 02 55 327 00 00 64 326 00 01 66 324 00 01 18 328 00 00 24 323 00 02 73 322 00 06 43 321 00 00 20 338 00 01 58 339 00 02 49 340 00 03 24 341 00 00 23 243 00 00 39 242 00 02 86 241 00 00 52 244 00 00 68 245 00 01 08 246 00 01 84 247 00 00 20 249 00 00 47 254 00 00 59 251 00 01 49 255 00 00 20 252 00 00 95 250 00 01 81 234 00 00 20 232 00 08 72 233 00 00 33 231 00 03 56 221 00 00 86 220 00 02 96 218 00 00 20 217 00 01 37 216 00 01 15[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2997
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
109 00 00 20
108 00 01 49
107 00 02 82
106 00 00 30
85 00 00 61
87 00 01 21
84 00 01 24
88 00 00 23
92 00 01 34
93 00 04 18
94 00 00 20
सरवां नन्दलाल डीह – 132 78 00 02 95
79 00 03 29
सरवां बांधडीह - 134 43 00 02 14
42 00 00 99
41 00 00 20
44 00 02 57
45 00 02 22
46 00 01 66
49 00 00 37
61 00 00 20
65 00 00 34
68 00 01 17
70 00 00 20
69 00 00 53
67 00 01 48
66 00 00 20
90 00 00 20
91 00 02 73
93 00 03 13
94 00 02 55
सरवां कु शमाहा - 96 1532 00 03 25
1531 00 02 48
1529 00 01 89
1519 00 00 84
2998 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1525 00 00 20
1523 00 03 86
1522 00 01 77
1501 00 05 45
1495 00 00 33
1496 00 03 11
1500 00 00 86
1497 00 05 61
1629 00 00 61
1498 00 02 68
1479 00 00 20
1478 00 09 96
346 00 00 20
345 00 05 92
313 00 03 72
312 00 05 67
सरवां सरवां - 104 2388 00 00 20
1050 00 00 60
1049 00 07 05
1048 00 00 82
1045 00 03 16
1032 00 01 55
1033 00 01 24
1034 00 00 99
1035 00 00 20
1043 00 04 75
1042 00 00 40
996 00 05 32
997 00 02 60
993 00 06 00
992 00 00 20
990 00 09 11
991 00 00 20
2413 00 01 85
988 00 00 43
सरवां पहाड़पुर - 97 94 00 00 56
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 2999
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
107 00 03 12
108 00 01 72
109 00 00 29
104 00 02 19
100 00 08 07
73 00 03 24
74 00 00 31
99 00 04 43
75 00 03 15
77 00 06 27
47 00 02 74
36 00 07 17
34 00 01 84
37 00 02 77
33 00 04 76
38 00 00 24
31 00 09 32
सरवां बीशूनपूर - 98 156 00 06 32
118 00 05 90
119 00 02 68
121 00 02 19
122 00 05 63
123 00 00 20
124 00 00 88
126 00 03 73
128 00 02 27
130 00 03 50
129 00 04 76
134 00 01 02
133 00 08 54
136 00 02 54
97 00 00 66
141 00 03 43
143 00 01 82
142 00 01 67
146 00 09 11
105 00 19 51
3000 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
सरवां बैदनाथपुर - 82 252 00 20 78
225 00 00 20
221 00 07 08
224 00 01 69
222 00 03 05
223 00 02 51
219 00 00 56
211 00 02 89
212 00 03 05
218 00 05 38
217 00 01 65
216 00 14 09
सरवां हरलाडीह - 22 146 00 11 74
151 00 02 30
147 00 03 53
152 00 06 72
135 00 01 25
134 00 05 27
127 00 01 98
133 00 02 34
131 00 03 50
378 00 03 22
124 00 01 20
120 00 01 68
117 00 03 14
116 00 02 46
115 00 05 08
111 00 06 67
113 00 00 20
108 00 01 48
109 00 00 20
89 00 00 68
87 00 10 95
86 00 00 26
88 00 01 21
59 00 00 68
24 00 03 35
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3001
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
19 00 03 78
18 00 03 95
16 00 00 20
15 00 01 86
14 00 07 12
13 00 04 02
सरवां दुलोडी - 21 578 00 01 78
577 00 02 47
576 00 00 20
549 00 02 76
547 00 01 51
548 00 01 03
545 00 01 47
544 00 04 12
543 00 01 23
1 00 02 58
मोहनपुर खैरखुटी - 657 668 00 01 75
667 00 00 35
669 00 00 82
672 00 01 95
673 00 06 59
674 00 00 50
677 00 01 29
645 00 05 60
665 00 00 31
646 00 01 88
631 00 08 56
632 00 07 71
635 00 09 00
636 00 02 09
638 00 03 61
637 00 04 79
494 00 03 45
492 00 03 49
487 00 00 93
491 00 03 50
3002 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
441 00 09 65
440 00 00 42
418 00 23 85
438 00 01 06
437 00 11 27
426 00 02 55
424 00 02 79
427 00 06 90
696 00 00 53
429 00 00 52
428 00 05 76
52 00 01 55
55 00 00 84
54 00 01 81
51 00 02 09
50 00 04 48
49 00 00 41
मोहनपुर झारखन्डी - 646 989 00 00 67
988 00 02 12
984 00 02 06
986 00 03 45
985 00 02 51
980 00 02 57
993 00 00 40
978 00 17 35
976 00 02 33
975 00 00 40
977 00 00 20
मोहनपुर बनपोखरिया - 656 164 00 01 17
160 00 04 36
161 00 02 82
136 00 03 02
159 00 09 25
146 00 00 47
147 00 05 53
174 00 01 83
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3003
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
141 00 00 67
137 00 01 23
138 00 02 62
124 00 15 22
126 00 11 26
129 00 00 20
127 00 00 20
131 00 04 54
132 00 04 39
60 00 02 12
57 00 01 80
56 00 02 00
55 00 13 50
44 00 06 06
38 00 17 08
39 00 00 29
14 00 03 62
13 00 01 57
11 00 02 36
1 00 01 61
172 00 00 64
मोहनपुर गादीबिलया - 655 117 00 04 75
119 00 00 20
108 00 05 94
106 00 01 57
मोहनपुर ितवारीकनारी - 654 15 00 00 20
17 00 01 77
14 00 05 14
13 00 07 17
6 00 05 23
7 00 02 41
9 00 10 85
2 00 02 34
मोहनपुर गादीबिलया - 653 10 00 10 50
9 00 00 20
मोहनपुर किसनीडीह - 662 807 00 03 34
3004 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
791 00 02 15 585 00 01 53 586 00 00 46 583 00 07 87 423 00 01 00 422 00 00 99 419 00 04 90 425 00 00 20 430 00 02 46 418 00 00 87 431 00 03 27 433 00 08 50 532 00 03 68 440 00 01 40 441 00 00 49 447 00 00 49 451 00 12 61 530 00 00 20 459 00 04 40 452 00 00 51 453 00 02 07 454 00 00 20 455 00 00 30 525 00 00 90 456 00 02 37 458 00 00 84 457 00 05 38 515 00 01 14 506 00 00 52 514 00 00 20 512 00 03 96 511 00 00 25 510 00 00 76 497 00 04 56 495 00 00 54 496 00 02 94 481 00 03 04 482 00 00 20[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3005
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
374 00 15 44
मोहनपुर सीमरापोज - 652 41 00 01 49
3 00 00 93
42 00 00 20
मोहनपुर नरही - 663 301 00 01 07
316 00 02 32
317 00 10 33
315 00 10 18
306 00 01 47
314 00 03 31
313 00 15 37
मोहनपुर पकिड़या - 674 348 00 01 60
349 00 04 35
350 00 03 21
354 00 00 88
351 00 01 78
353 00 02 80
352 00 00 57
356 00 01 90
330 00 03 02
329 00 03 24
331 00 00 20
328 00 11 47
326 00 07 43
327 00 00 32
323 00 06 39
322 00 00 34
मोहनपुर ढाकोडीह - 665 425 00 00 36
424 00 01 80
423 00 09 69
480 00 03 25
415 00 01 39
481 00 03 58
403 00 00 57
3006 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
411 00 04 57
410 00 05 61
409 00 01 84
413 00 08 15
308 00 08 58
310 00 09 71
311 00 00 88
309 00 00 90
477 00 01 60
मोहनपुर नवाडीह - 673 35 00 00 20
34 00 00 64
33 00 01 29
40 00 01 27
31 00 03 36
29 00 11 20
30 00 01 81
28 00 05 04
मोहनपुर िसरसा - 672 76 00 07 38
73 00 29 10
55 00 00 20
50 00 01 71
49 00 03 70
47 00 01 44
48 00 00 25
11 00 09 84
13 00 05 68
28 00 02 89
17 00 16 78
मोहनपुर गोरिसघा - 671 10 00 19 23
11 00 18 48
मोहनपुर हरकटा - 678 200 00 08 43
202 00 02 63
203 00 04 09
204 00 01 96
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3007
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
188 00 02 23
194 00 08 97
189 00 00 53
मोहनपुर मेदनी डीह - 681 495 00 07 89
514 00 00 55
511 00 01 98
526 00 07 71
524 00 08 65
515 00 08 14
356 00 02 04
455 00 01 18
456 00 01 21
440 00 08 88
446 00 00 32
445 00 04 11
444 00 00 20
443 00 03 47
442 00 00 91
413 00 03 00
417 00 06 83
416 00 00 20
404 00 06 95
402 00 05 52
390 00 00 33
401 00 01 31
399 00 02 56
400 00 00 21
398 00 01 20
मोहनपुर रंगा मोदीचक - 705 52 00 00 49
11 00 03 32
5 00 03 58
10 00 00 20
9 o 01 14
8 00 00 77
12 00 10 97
3008 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
16 00 06 43
48 00 20 84
3 00 00 84
2 00 05 37
मोहनपुर सीगांरडीह - 702 378 00 19 83
मोहनपुर िबरहाबरन - 704 113 00 02 48
112 00 01 76
109 00 12 07
103 00 02 44
102 00 09 85
93 00 01 43
96 00 05 01
100 00 01 35
99 00 04 58
20 00 03 62
6 00 02 21
7 00 12 19
1 00 05 14
2 00 00 20
मोहनपुर पथरचपटी - 703 25 00 29 67
मोहनपुर ठाढी - 688 677 00 00 33
501 00 04 30
676 00 00 31
515 00 09 01
493 00 00 20
492 00 05 18
491 00 00 43
490 00 00 82
486 00 00 62
485 00 02 44
487 00 06 08
474 00 02 45
488 00 00 45
473 00 00 81
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3009
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
469 00 00 20
470 00 01 97
443 00 04 26
445 00 02 33
447 00 00 20
446 00 00 37
419 00 03 21
367 00 05 93
364 00 00 20
365 00 00 20
366 00 02 77
360 00 02 38
355 00 05 97
307 00 00 31
305 00 05 38
300 00 07 03
301 00 00 20
302 00 01 03
239 00 02 25
201 00 05 23
202 00 02 65
203 00 06 45
206 00 00 97
207 00 01 02
167 00 03 60
165 00 06 81
मोहनपुर बाघमारी - 687 32 00 05 28
30 00 23 40
21 00 09 27
22 00 04 77
5 00 01 00
4 00 09 65
2 00 01 10
1 00 02 33
मोहनपुर अठमुरीआ - 691 93 00 00 25
292 00 01 01
मोहनपुर अमगिडआ - 578 386 00 01 27
3010 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
387 00 20 33
355 00 00 22
300 00 03 77
375 00 01 43
374 00 01 13
356 00 00 29
301 00 02 35
354 00 04 81
353 00 05 10
313 00 03 47
314 00 03 02
312 00 00 20
316 00 07 56
197 00 00 20
196 00 04 23
198 00 03 00
195 00 05 99
201 00 00 84
202 00 00 73
166 00 02 71
167 00 00 20
168 00 06 86
156 00 05 43
133 00 09 05
394 00 01 99
155 00 00 65
138 00 00 20
135 00 03 70
134 00 01 10
128 00 04 93
मोहनपुर पुनिसया - 579 668 00 06 24
669 00 01 75
393 00 01 45
675 00 09 06
674 00 05 83
679 00 10 78
680 00 03 13
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3011
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
392 00 01 13
704 00 01 36
705 00 02 61
706 00 02 38
707 00 01 73
380 00 00 24
379 00 04 14
378 00 00 74
376 00 01 16
359 00 00 64
357 00 00 21
358 00 01 48
360 00 00 20
345 00 00 26
344 00 01 28
343 00 01 64
341 00 00 47
327 00 01 39
330 00 00 20
328 00 01 89
329 00 01 81
314 00 00 89
315 00 00 82
313 00 01 13
312 00 01 05
311 00 00 20
308 00 01 38
307 00 00 64
303 00 03 32
305 00 00 23
302 00 02 61
1373 00 00 54
867 00 00 32
868 00 01 86
869 00 00 34
98 00 07 72
99 00 03 77
मोहनपुर बलसरा - 570 46 00 04 51
3012 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
48 00 00 54
मोहनपुर बलसरा - 571 39 00 01 10
36 00 13 72
मोहनपुर कोडाबांध - 558 31 00 05 76
28 00 01 84
30 00 00 20
27 00 03 55
24 00 01 25
22 00 04 23
21 00 01 88
23 00 00 20
20 00 02 51
18 00 05 83
19 00 00 74
मोहनपुर चकजजवारा रांगाटांड़ - 557 73 00 06 34
मोहनपुर कु सुमबाद - 568 8 00 03 61
18 00 03 02
21 00 02 62
22 00 01 53
23 00 02 54
24 00 05 28
101 00 00 39
102 00 02 25
103 00 05 72
104 00 00 20
मोहनपुर हेठछोट बंधा - 561 1 00 02 09
2 00 02 35
मोहनपुर चक नवाडीह - 556 8 00 02 46
9 00 02 84
7 00 02 53
मोहनपुर गौरीगंज - 555 96 00 09 19
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3013
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
49 00 01 90
48 00 01 51
47 00 01 43
43 00 01 60
42 00 02 07
41 00 01 92
3 00 14 84
2 00 03 84
1 00 00 80
122 00 05 01
121 00 01 91
मोहनपुर खजूरिया - 420 63 00 20 60
44 00 00 42
39 00 14 47
36 00 00 20
38 00 03 48
34 00 04 00
62 00 02 28
A 00 67 80
61 01 11 57
देवघर घोड़मारा - 422 250 00 13 51
देवघर पिछवारी कोठिआ - 242 949 00 18 28
948 00 15 03
920 00 10 81
921 00 08 28
919 00 21 45
913 00 19 21
911 00 06 63
909 00 10 28
896 00 22 77
898 00 01 95
899 00 06 61
868 00 04 66
869 00 01 64
867 00 11 08
3014 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
793 00 10 51
794 00 00 20
795 00 12 18
862 00 01 81
806 00 17 00
855 00 01 16
856 00 01 23
850 00 00 92
849 00 17 85
814 00 01 23
813 00 05 02
812 00 01 58
822 00 02 85
821 00 07 01
820 00 00 39
831 00 20 21
832 00 09 65
834 00 15 91
836 00 14 28
339 00 15 14
338 00 07 14
99 00 00 20
95 00 26 10
957 00 00 86
देवघर गरीबिखल - 243 2 00 01 76
1 00 02 51
3 00 01 84
6 00 01 32
7 00 01 15
8 00 01 14
9 00 01 63
10 00 00 55
देवघर सनकरी - 229 1250 00 01 97
1248 00 11 02
1251 00 06 69
1252 00 19 32
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3015
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1227 00 00 20 1217 00 00 57 1226 00 04 59 1218 00 05 95 1223 00 07 57 1220 00 00 80 1222 00 08 55 1062 00 06 69 1063 00 12 81 1064 00 04 95 1065 00 02 77 1027 00 00 87 1028 00 00 36 1029 00 02 05 1030 00 00 23 1032 00 01 75 1031 00 02 94 1025 00 05 34 1026 00 02 20 1022 00 04 09 1091 00 00 94 1092 00 04 06 1093 00 09 25 1094 00 02 06 1098 00 01 76 1099 00 01 92 723 0 03 49 472 00 06 51 473 00 00 20 471 00 08 71 464 00 02 83 465 00 02 04 463 00 03 61 462 00 01 41 461 00 01 02 458 00 00 20 460 00 00 36 529 00 04 64 540 00 04 333016 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
देवघर बसमनडीह - 228 2 00 00 49
5 00 07 49
8 00 07 35
9 00 00 24
10 00 01 02
44 00 03 44
45 00 03 01
43 00 00 93
41 00 06 08
42 00 04 17
22 00 02 12
23 00 01 06
25 00 00 30
24 00 01 30
18 00 05 63
देवघर देवपुर - 227 684 00 35 64
347 00 02 53
344 00 00 20
357 00 01 43
342 00 00 22
343 00 02 01
340 00 01 41
362 00 07 60
364 00 00 20
365 00 00 53
394 00 05 45
393 00 00 45
392 00 00 41
389 00 03 95
391 00 00 20
390 00 00 92
385 00 00 68
386 00 00 20
249 00 04 07
395 00 00 20
देवघर सरसा - 226 690 00 08 93
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3017
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
671 00 03 69 672 00 03 46 661 00 02 59 660 00 03 57 394 00 01 11 797 00 01 82 781 00 02 06 796 00 03 58 793 00 00 33 795 00 01 48 794 00 02 72 815 00 03 97 816 00 00 35 817 00 02 04 818 00 01 90 823 00 00 46 822 00 02 88 821 00 03 84 825 00 00 20 351 00 02 09 1209 00 00 20 1208 00 08 96 1207 00 00 92 1177 00 00 20 1206 00 01 29 1205 00 00 37 1203 00 03 61 1204 00 00 53 1202 00 00 34 1201 00 01 80 1200 00 02 57 1199 00 03 10 1198 00 01 91 1183 00 00 63 1185 00 01 91 1197 00 00 64 1187 00 00 20 1184 00 01 03 1186 00 06 533018 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
देवघर खड़हरा - 211 438 00 36 74
105 00 35 49
110 00 03 70
111 00 03 30
109 00 01 86
112 00 03 54
114 00 02 02
115 00 03 34
117 00 00 32
116 00 03 17
118 00 06 18
121 00 06 39
127 00 00 83
125 00 00 55
123 00 05 21
221 00 03 08
220 00 00 98
218 00 08 56
215 00 00 20
214 00 02 37
219 00 00 27
199 00 03 83
213 00 02 59
212 00 00 60
202 00 03 98
205 00 05 83
206 00 00 26
204 00 01 19
239 00 01 00
241 00 01 78
242 00 02 02
243 00 03 25
244 00 00 92
248 00 01 87
247 00 00 20
249 00 07 90
336 00 02 62
335 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3019
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
482 00 00 71
288 00 11 97
484 00 06 05
2 00 04 97
देवघर नवाडीह - 212 461 00 30 40
462 00 06 39
491 00 14 02
490 00 18 67
485 00 31 23
देवघर सरासनी - 213 540 00 19 44
551 00 02 64
516 00 06 43
523 00 10 10
525 00 12 01
527 00 00 20
526 00 02 10
580 00 02 43
581 00 00 46
538 00 01 43
584 00 00 83
556 00 05 41
569 00 00 78
202 00 01 83
204 00 01 40
203 00 00 26
572 00 00 20
208 00 02 61
573 00 00 01
207 00 01 06
210 00 01 60
211 00 04 39
291 00 15 30
541 00 00 25
290 00 03 66
289 00 02 71
311 00 01 99
312 00 00 35
3020 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
305 00 04 42
195 00 07 79
308 00 06 20
193 00 08 36
192 00 00 87
देवघर फु टाबांध - 27 186 00 03 26
181 00 01 85
284 00 00 38
देवघर के ननकाटी - 7 98 00 06 42
97 00 11 72
96 00 00 29
90 00 22 16
89 00 01 09
88 00 00 81
74 00 31 22
73 00 26 87
48 00 20 09
49 00 53 72
50 00 01 29
देवघर बदिया - 8 20 00 00 28
22 00 00 88
469 00 49 72
670 00 02 14
468 00 01 30
428 00 13 74
668 00 12 81
669 00 00 20
427 00 01 43
24 00 09 11
23 00 48 53
25 00 09 58
देवघर घटियारी - 9 595 00 23 47
494 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3021
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
484 00 20 50
485 00 25 42
480 00 07 96
471 00 02 89
472 00 03 79
470 00 00 20
469 00 06 75
150 00 00 89
178 00 04 11
177 00 03 77
176 00 04 12
175 00 02 83
174 00 02 98
173 00 04 81
593 00 30 85
264 00 00 75
देवघर बढनीआ - 11 409 00 15 60
441 00 01 01
414 00 22 85
406 00 03 17
404 00 04 67
316 00 19 61
341 00 00 34
342 00 11 91
348 00 01 33
343 00 07 54
344 00 01 67
349 00 00 20
248 00 08 50
247 00 06 78
246 00 10 71
47 00 03 54
46 00 00 84
42 00 03 77
48 00 01 13
49 00 00 20
41 00 05 18
3022 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
27 00 00 46 31 00 02 23 16 00 00 70 15 00 01 02 17 00 01 39 18 00 00 92 553 00 03 07 13 00 01 03 6 00 04 16 1 00 00 82
[फा. सं. आर-11025/(11)/21/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27764]
शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 769.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of the India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S. O. No. 2845 Dated 31st October, 2017 published on 23rd December 2017 and vide S.O. No. 1764 dated 7th December 2018 published on 15th December, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Haldia- Barauni Pipeline Systems Project" for the transportation of Crude Oil in Deoghar District in the State of Jharkhand by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 12.10.2018.
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P&MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3023SCHEDULE
| District : DEOGHAR State : JHARKHAND | |||||
| Tehsil | Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
665 00 00 20 619 00 01 50 617 00 03 25 618 00 00 25 616 00 04 56 604 00 00 40 615 00 00 86 605 00 02 51 607 00 02 05 608 00 02 51 609 00 00 20 330 00 01 17 341 00 01 04 337 00 02 15 336 00 01 64 335 00 00 20 334 00 03 61 332 00 00 65 333 00 02 51 328 00 01 20 323 00 01 19 322 00 02 05 322/1349 00 01 21 320 00 00 73 321 00 02 17 317 00 02 26 319 00 00 20 318 00 02 06 714 00 04 29 788 00 07 87 787 00 03 09 768 00 01 49 767 00 02 46 718 00 00 20 719 00 00 79 720 00 02 55 721 00 06 543024 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
761 00 09 47
762 00 04 01
1154 00 15 68
9 00 12 74
8 00 01 08
PALOJORI SATKI - 664 914 00 34 83
402 00 03 20
958 00 05 07
396 00 07 90
397 00 01 62
393 00 01 91
392 00 02 48
435 00 03 03
231 00 03 05
PALOJORI BANSNALI - 684 795 00 05 00
495 00 20 64
787 00 01 11
140 00 52 23
139 00 05 27
PALOJORI BERWAMARNI - 665 584 00 12 33
582 00 01 96
581 00 00 97
580 00 05 93
579 00 00 20
534 00 02 65
531 00 01 54
536 00 02 38
537 00 02 14
538 00 02 01
542 00 02 71
539 00 01 87
529 00 08 29
527 00 03 08
528 00 00 35
490 00 03 15
489 00 07 06
491 00 00 24
487 00 03 23
488 00 02 36
PALOJORI HIRAPUR - 663 561/569 00 00 44
487 00 06 38
488 00 02 05
486 00 00 23
485 00 02 62
483 00 14 36
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3025
480 00 02 36
479 00 02 81
478 00 02 61
423 00 00 20
508 00 00 86
PALOJORI GHORMARA - 662 446 00 00 62
450 00 01 50
452 00 01 42
454 00 01 71
453 00 03 11
460 00 00 50
461 00 22 16
471 00 00 20
470 00 05 86
463 00 02 48
467 00 02 20
464 00 04 32
409 00 02 36
410 00 01 93
411 00 01 81
412 00 03 77
413 00 04 17
414 00 01 70
334 00 00 66
37 00 01 67
38 00 01 65
39 00 01 55
40 00 01 47
41 00 02 15
42 00 02 30
43 00 02 70
45 00 02 08
46 00 01 81
48 00 02 41
49 00 00 20
59 00 02 08
58 00 00 61
60 00 00 20
61 00 01 18
62 00 02 19
63 00 00 67
64 00 11 90
67 00 01 21
68 00 02 37
PALOJORI SIRAMPUR - 660 1178 00 02 313026 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1171 00 01 42
1170 00 02 43
1169 00 21 82
1211 00 07 71
1212 00 00 20
1215 00 01 53
1214 00 12 21
981 00 02 98
948 00 04 44
898 00 23 52
933 00 00 85
934 00 04 55
921 00 03 81
935 00 03 03
937 00 00 23
936 00 01 44
924 00 01 98
927 00 00 43
941 00 15 96
943 00 00 60
PALOJORI AMGACHHI - 658 354 00 00 19
258 00 01 84
259 00 00 41
260 00 07 96
261 00 03 29
272 00 02 16
295 00 00 84
293 00 00 24
296 00 03 89
298 00 03 69
300 00 00 35
299 00 02 00
180 00 08 00
178 00 00 20
179 00 00 42
535 00 12 89
185 00 05 67
183 00 03 13
166 00 01 17
165 00 01 19
140 00 01 65
164 00 01 15
163 00 00 68
162 00 01 54
158 00 02 75
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3027
152 00 06 11
155 00 00 20
537 00 00 20
153 00 01 46
82 00 04 19
91 00 08 36
79 00 00 66
78 00 00 31
75 00 02 31
72 00 00 20
65 00 05 51
PALOJORI SIMLA - 625 1587 00 00 20
1575 00 00 52
1574 00 05 95
1570 00 04 58
1568 00 03 20
1566 00 03 62
1560 00 03 24
1558 00 04 18
1545 00 02 84
1546 00 03 38
1507 00 02 38
1509 00 05 59
1503 00 02 100
1502 00 02 71
1501 00 00 62
1510 00 01 93
1498 00 02 44
1500 00 00 20
1499 00 01 80
1496 00 00 93
1495 00 01 49
1494 00 02 77
1493 00 01 14
1466 00 00 79
1464 00 02 68
1463 00 01 61
1461 00 01 86
1462 00 02 27
1459 00 04 32
1469 00 00 92
1458 00 00 36
1402 00 02 26
1401 00 06 00
1403 00 01 20
3028 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1418 00 01 83
1419 00 19 88
1433 00 02 57
1424 00 00 78
1425 00 01 70
1340 00 01 69
1339 00 02 59
1338 00 00 20
1337 00 00 28
1336 00 01 91
1331 00 02 78
1323 00 05 39
1304 00 05 11
1327 00 03 97
1307 00 02 03
1306 00 00 68
1305 00 00 85
1303 00 02 06
1296 00 08 35
1290 00 04 42
1291 00 01 81
1292 00 04 49
1293 00 03 17
1273 00 05 60
1270 00 01 19
PALOJORI PAHARIYAPARA - 623 156 00 01 17
153 00 08 25
157 00 06 05
152 00 02 22
150 00 06 85
151 00 00 45
149 00 04 43
106 00 00 51
10 00 01 75
108 00 05 53
107 00 00 20
4 00 12 49
3 00 00 31
PALOJORI JAGADISPUR - 622 112 00 23 90
109 00 07 13
110 00 00 78
111 00 00 20
27 00 00 91
20 00 18 08
PALOJORI BISUNPUR - 620 111 00 08 43
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3029
94 00 01 62
93 00 02 87
90 00 03 18
PALOJORI PATHRABAHAL - 464 174 00 00 45
182 00 00 20
168 00 09 77
126 00 00 20
125 00 00 90
127 00 05 60
130 00 00 20
131 00 01 18
119 00 06 05
118 00 02 38
115 00 01 70
117 00 03 20
116 00 01 79
183 00 00 20
102 00 01 11
103 00 00 20
101 00 00 20
66 00 01 60
100 00 00 27
68 00 02 22
99 00 00 20
69 00 01 74
70 00 04 57
71 00 01 53
72 00 02 04
57 00 00 20
73 00 01 47
56 00 05 60
53 00 06 62
55 00 01 55
52 00 00 41
PALOJORI SARSA - 463 1381 00 00 37
1391 00 01 92
1394 00 04 81
1385 00 01 11
1390 00 00 77
1389 00 01 72
814 00 00 78
813 00 01 30
812 00 10 74
810 00 17 11
803 00 00 20
3030 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
461 00 00 20
460 00 02 25
458 00 06 38
581 00 00 98
446 00 11 23
445 00 00 20
443 00 04 49
442 00 01 53
441 00 00 20
440 00 00 60
438 00 00 30
439 00 01 01
401 00 02 75
400 00 03 94
387 00 04 22
388 00 00 21
389 00 01 70
390 00 00 37
391 00 03 24
392 00 00 24
343 00 03 50
64 00 05 10
59 00 01 48
60 00 02 77
57 00 01 34
56 00 07 43
55 00 02 40
49 00 05 98
41 00 00 20
63 00 01 02
PALOJORI RAMJIBANPUR - 468 85 00 12 92
82 00 03 14
81 00 00 29
80 00 07 56
78 00 00 77
79 00 02 17
46 00 02 26
94 00 04 30
95 00 00 20
47 00 02 89
48 00 01 97
45 00 01 42
44 00 00 29
43 00 03 75
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3031
127 00 02 63
PALOJORI KHAGA - 470 1366 00 03 12
1363 00 04 99
1361 00 00 20
1364 00 01 84
1358 00 07 51
1355 00 00 67
1354 00 00 20
1353 00 02 54
1352 00 00 64
1285 00 00 73
1350 00 00 88
1349 00 00 40
947 00 00 21
962 00 02 02
961 00 01 26
960 00 01 58
959 00 00 32
958 00 02 78
956 00 03 51
955 00 00 20
952 00 08 67
954 00 03 11
953 00 01 34
979 00 00 20
949 00 04 29
980 00 01 68
814 00 00 50
813 00 00 59
818 00 00 69
815 00 02 05
816 00 00 90
786 00 01 05
807 00 00 76
806 00 00 20
787 00 00 20
788 00 02 19
789 00 01 86
790 00 01 95
791 00 01 07
793 00 00 20
730 00 02 66
729 00 00 58
694 00 19 63
695 00 03 59
3032 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
617 00 02 86
1375 00 00 92
293 00 12 65
296 00 00 84
297 00 05 09
298 00 00 90
287 00 01 46
281 00 06 27
278 00 01 44
272 00 02 99
271 00 07 56
256/1382 00 00 48
256 00 03 98
257 00 01 04
251 00 01 06
258 00 00 32
250 00 05 14
249 00 01 21
245 00 06 47
1384 00 02 29
246 00 02 79
PALOJORI RAGHUWADIH - 460 198 00 02 19
197 00 04 29
187 00 03 43
186 00 02 49
181 00 00 76
182 00 03 50
180 00 00 50
179 00 02 34
176 00 06 89
177 00 00 63
171 00 02 63
PALOJORI SONATAR - 459 931 00 00 20
930 00 03 21
700 00 00 63
906 00 02 07
905 00 11 11
904 00 01 88
899 00 01 97
900 00 00 42
895 00 03 58
894 00 06 20
803 00 03 03
1041 00 01 80
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3033
798 00 00 49
791 00 05 03
781 00 31 64
PALOJORI SITAL KUNDI - 458 34 00 67 58
422 00 22 16
425 00 05 58
35 00 16 63
37 00 03 01
40 00 10 53
46 00 03 08
25 00 02 90
448 00 02 83
18 00 03 95
19 00 00 20
17 00 07 12
23 00 09 73
14 00 02 63
13 00 00 20
1 00 01 47
PALOJORI BIRAJPUR - 440 2111 00 08 64
2110 00 00 20
2107 00 01 69
2106 00 02 64
2105 00 06 46
1994 00 17 75
PALOJORI SATALDIH CHANDPUR - 457 790 00 12 75
429 00 01 07
420 00 00 49
428 00 01 90
427 00 04 13
426 00 04 19
422 00 00 20
423 00 00 61
424 00 02 84
425 00 02 98
393 00 00 04
394 00 03 46
417 00 00 20
395 00 02 32
396 00 02 09
397 00 05 22
399 00 06 27
398 00 00 20
404 00 08 54
PALOJORI BARDAHA - 456 1087 00 07 83
3034 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1080 00 01 46
1079 00 04 99
1076 00 06 19
1041 00 00 74
1031 00 09 14
1030 00 02 30
895 00 01 37
905 00 02 72
907 00 03 11
904 00 00 28
908 00 05 71
593 00 01 00
793 00 01 54
795 00 07 74
794 00 00 33
588 00 19 81
590 00 18 34
591 00 06 38
142 00 00 20
1166 00 03 07
1165 00 00 20
136 00 06 43
135 00 03 63
134 00 00 40
124 00 15 74
125 00 00 20
62 00 01 25
100 00 00 20
72 00 04 28
68 00 03 35
66 00 02 36
67 00 04 35
47 00 00 20
48 00 03 36
1169 00 16 24
37 00 03 00
4 00 13 92
1 00 01 58
PALOJORI PHARAAM - 454 153 00 00 32
151 00 00 54
149 00 16 48
150 00 00 92
148 00 03 81
147 00 02 55
124 00 02 11
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3035
120 00 02 01
122 00 05 69
PALOJORI KORIADIH - 453 1303 00 01 23
1302 00 01 87
1301 00 00 20
1300 00 02 69
1299 00 00 20
1297 00 05 63
1294 00 04 60
1293 00 04 43
1292 00 02 05
1248 00 01 20
1250 00 00 27
1249 00 01 70
1254 00 00 68
1255 00 03 19
1257 00 01 62
1256 00 05 30
1051 00 00 63
1052 00 04 25
1055 00 00 33
1031 00 06 04
1032 00 03 92
1030 00 02 02
1029 00 01 37
1028 00 00 38
1002 00 07 85
1003 00 02 97
981 00 07 78
980 00 00 60
970 00 00 20
979 00 00 20
971 00 02 77
969 00 00 35
968 00 02 33
967 00 01 13
961 00 00 58
962 00 02 64
963 00 01 25
958 00 01 10
1387 00 00 48
SARATH GOPLARAE DIH - 447 891 00 00 72
892 00 11 33
926 00 01 91
895 00 10 45
3036 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
840 00 00 26 837 00 06 98 804 00 04 36 803 00 00 47 801 00 04 33 800 00 03 86 798 00 03 83 797 00 05 11 796 00 05 15 779 00 00 73 448 00 04 76 447 00 03 80 442 00 02 41 441 00 00 20 439 00 01 38 435 00 00 20 436 00 01 10 433 00 01 98 430 00 02 04 425 00 03 95 422 00 01 48 411 00 01 90 412 00 00 69 413 00 00 50 414 00 00 71 417 00 01 61 380 - 02 21 381 00 01 51 382 00 00 97 383 00 01 87 362 00 01 54 384 00 02 20 361 00 01 34 270 00 07 29 269 00 04 37 260 00 00 61 259 00 00 56 253 00 00 53 275 00 03 06 276 00 05 61 277 00 01 13 281 00 03 17 283 00 02 75 284 00 04 06 291 00 03 81[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3037
231 00 03 77
225 00 00 42
226 00 02 70
224 00 04 91
223 00 06 28
213 00 02 21
214 00 03 33
215 00 03 98
216 00 03 05
168 00 10 42
169 00 07 19
32 00 15 04
33 00 06 03
46 00 00 20
47 00 00 61
31 00 01 71
30 00 02 43
1 00 03 53
SARATH KACHUABANK - 224 1464 00 02 18
1492 00 02 03
1461 00 03 55
1451 00 00 83
1452 00 02 20
1455 00 00 79
1453 00 03 63
1447 00 02 41
1412 00 01 29
1410 00 00 81
1411 00 01 52
1409 00 00 20
1413 00 01 90
1414 00 03 07
1416 00 01 46
1393 00 06 46
1415 00 01 86
1392 00 00 74
1396 00 07 20
1336 00 12 96
1337 00 03 75
1361 00 13 86
1338 00 00 20
1348 00 00 34
1357 00 06 22
1356 00 05 24
1355 00 02 19
3038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1524 00 00 42
1525 00 01 59
1526 00 00 90
733 00 03 60
SARATH DHORO DUMAR - 225 337 00 05 96
334 00 05 27
303 00 07 83
304 00 01 02
300 00 03 09
295 00 00 20
299 00 02 69
297 00 00 30
298 00 00 70
292 00 00 20
263 00 00 65
264 00 00 84
265 00 01 58
266 00 10 74
267 00 02 07
268 00 01 47
272 00 05 78
273 00 00 20
214 00 00 20
213 00 01 39
211 00 01 95
209 00 01 38
208 00 01 23
207 00 01 50
195 00 01 87
194 00 02 41
193 00 02 53
192 00 01 90
191 00 03 09
189 00 01 95
643 00 14 31
184 00 01 33
72 00 01 24
73 00 00 20
77 00 00 20
76 00 01 62
74 00 01 87
75 00 04 30
89 00 00 87
88 00 02 68
87 00 03 48
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3039
14 00 00 69
15 00 03 11
13 00 01 05
7 00 07 43
4 00 01 25
5 00 01 59
SARATH GOPIBANDH - 229 236 00 26 38
165 00 18 01
196 00 01 44
195 00 02 64
194 00 02 67
184 00 02 97
182 00 03 00
181 00 00 87
178 00 03 47
360 00 06 07
177 00 06 06
146 00 15 54
145 00 01 58
212 00 01 83
SARATH BARMASIA - 228 386 00 00 68
388 00 05 51
387 00 00 45
198 00 00 20
199 00 04 86
197 00 01 50
196 00 00 53
195 00 00 35
194 00 04 06
193 00 00 32
202 00 04 88
203 00 00 50
201 00 01 72
204 00 00 93
206 00 00 20
205 00 04 25
237 00 01 73
238 00 00 36
239 00 01 99
240 00 00 22
241 00 01 46
242 00 00 36
244 00 00 21
243 00 01 56
137 00 02 23
3040 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
134 00 02 02
135 00 00 44
129 00 02 42
128 00 02 67
SARATH PHASIABAD - 227 320 00 01 38
318 00 00 27
SARATH 26 00 05 78
DAROHIYA - 232
8 00 02 40
7 00 03 94
10 00 01 61
11 00 09 54
13 00 10 62
14 00 01 53
17 00 13 50
15 00 00 20
3 00 05 45
1 00 02 51
SARATH MAHESLITI - 233 273 00 03 29
252 00 01 20
246 00 02 22
251 00 00 20
250 00 02 52
249 00 01 57
248 00 02 36
147 00 03 89
144 00 00 75
145 00 02 55
146 00 01 89
149 00 00 20
157 00 03 07
153 00 00 92
154 00 01 63
155 00 00 20
161 00 00 70
159 00 00 20
160 00 01 75
163 00 00 64
158 00 00 58
121 00 00 78
25 00 00 20
24 00 01 87
22 00 01 75
21 00 00 30
23 00 00 20
SARATH PARBANK - 235 208 00 00 45[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3041
166 00 00 40
167 00 02 18
204 00 00 41
168 00 02 13
169 00 04 94
181 00 03 60
180 00 02 06
123 00 00 91
88 00 01 29
87 00 04 86
82 00 01 54
80 00 02 42
38 00 05 63
36 00 02 08
39 00 03 49
1 00 03 81
SARATH KUMRABANDI - 237 287 00 03 59
259 00 03 20
260 00 00 75
268 00 03 34
261 00 01 15
263 00 00 11
262 00 01 45
243 00 05 50
244 00 11 24
241 00 02 51
194 00 00 72
193 00 02 05
SARATH DEOLI - 238 585 00 07 16
581 00 00 32
580 00 06 49
578 00 01 88
577 00 01 47
576 00 00 20
575 00 00 31
574 00 06 43
573 00 02 43
569 00 08 30
568 00 03 09
527 00 03 55
526 00 07 11
521 00 03 28
525 00 00 20
509 00 06 98
507 00 01 10
3042 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
30 00 03 22
29 00 01 39
46 00 01 21
47 00 05 55
18 00 02 69
49 00 07 84
50 00 01 94
51 00 07 59
SARATH JOGIATIKAR - 239 50 00 03 12
49 00 05 43
52 00 01 66
40 00 03 83
39 00 05 67
42 00 04 06
37 00 03 07
35 00 03 52
34 00 02 74
27 00 00 83
SARATH SABAIJOR - 240 157 00 00 36
158 00 00 46
159 00 00 32
156 00 02 61
155 00 05 64
164 00 06 02
154 00 02 77
151 00 00 20
153 00 10 95
152 00 01 79
137 00 02 36
138 00 00 20
145 00 05 63
146 00 00 55
122 00 02 02
121 00 00 21
123 00 04 71
116 00 14 58
110 00 00 20
59 00 10 11
60 00 00 20
61 00 02 94
66 00 25 52
62 00 04 85
78 00 09 46
79 00 05 25
80 00 08 92
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3043
5 00 15 15
1 00 31 17
SARATH KORADIH - 243 5 00 06 08
3 00 25 57
SARWAN KORADIH - 240 273 00 05 20
97 00 03 95
SARWAN BANDAJORI - 241 934 00 09 66
930 00 05 30
929 00 03 88
933 00 00 20
833 00 24 30
835 00 05 15
975 00 01 17
834 00 06 06
832 00 04 53
830 00 01 69
968 00 07 40
974 00 02 52
811 00 08 12
804 00 01 39
803 00 00 20
805 00 02 30
789 00 04 71
790 00 01 24
793 00 02 35
794 00 00 46
761 00 09 74
763 00 00 29
762 00 01 07
616 00 05 31
617 00 04 61
618 00 00 47
633 00 01 17
186 00 00 20
185 00 03 14
184 00 04 69
190 00 04 11
183 00 02 02
182 00 02 63
181 00 00 20
180 00 02 64
179 00 03 24
178 00 02 48
68 00 00 20
174 00 02 51
3044 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
74 00 00 84
77 00 00 20
78 00 01 54
79 00 05 37
164 00 01 44
162 00 01 17
158 00 07 72
155 00 03 99
154 00 04 56
132 00 00 63
284 00 02 91
283 00 05 02
285 00 03 34
288 00 07 35
286 00 00 20
289 00 01 90
292 00 03 45
291 00 00 27
303 00 06 02
302 00 00 61
301 00 01 30
950 00 01 32
300 00 00 37
304 00 00 43
3 00 00 20
2 00 06 43
1 00 02 92
SARWAN SIRSA - 228 124 00 04 26
128 00 02 45
127 00 03 38
129 00 04 94
131 00 07 84
133 00 23 59
138 00 05 20
141 00 02 00
143 00 11 44
144 00 11 06
145 00 00 20
123 00 01 52
20 00 17 38
55 00 04 71
53 00 05 66
52 00 01 69
19 00 03 33
18 00 05 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3045
12 00 02 70
13 00 00 38
10 00 01 96
SARWAN JOGIYATIKAR - 243 227 00 02 50
228 00 02 25
230 00 01 61
229 00 02 44
224 00 02 35
214 00 03 73
213 00 01 49
212 00 04 62
211 00 00 24
34 00 15 91
33 00 15 72
32 00 05 43
8 00 23 92
350 00 06 90
349 00 03 86
348 00 03 91
22 00 04 17
343 00 04 56
344 00 04 91
345 00 05 17
346 00 05 10
347 00 00 20
9 00 04 20
1 00 00 67
SARWAN BAGHMARI - 223 195 00 00 32
153 00 02 01
154 00 00 20
152 00 06 49
151 00 01 84
148 00 00 20
146 00 02 56
127 00 01 36
128 00 01 31
134 00 01 65
131 00 06 83
83 00 01 10
38 00 04 90
39 00 03 61
34 00 00 40
40 00 05 63
32 00 01 55
31 00 02 18
30 00 02 76
3046 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
85 00 02 57
84 00 02 48
68 00 00 38
66 00 03 67
67 00 03 27
59 00 04 52
58 00 01 72
57 00 01 01
56 00 00 36
SARWAN BELA - 171 170 00 03 15
171 00 01 02
167 00 01 29
166 00 03 42
168 00 00 20
165 00 01 16
144 00 00 20
164 00 01 58
146 00 00 20
145 00 03 11
147 00 01 74
138 00 00 20
137 00 05 21
148 00 00 20
135 00 03 50
136 00 00 81
134 00 01 28
129 00 01 47
122 00 06 96
121 00 02 98
124 00 00 83
123 00 00 63
101 00 01 66
102 00 03 66
103 00 03 95
104 00 02 07
82 00 05 48
SARWAN DANGA - 172 63 00 10 13
66 00 16 21
67 00 11 96
34 00 00 82
37 00 05 23
40 00 06 08
38 00 00 50
30 00 03 28
28 00 04 34
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3047
17 00 04 93
20 00 00 24
19 00 04 92
3 00 07 89
SARWAN SURSURA - 220 121 00 01 09
120 00 02 44
119 00 00 57
118 00 00 20
102 00 00 20
101 00 05 24
95 00 00 20
96 00 03 51
97 00 01 35
93 00 03 01
92 00 01 19
SARWAN THARI - 219 370 00 00 37
366 00 04 81
367 00 04 01
364 00 02 56
362 00 05 13
314 00 02 84
316 00 02 33
317 00 07 77
321 00 01 67
320 00 00 20
322 00 02 21
324 00 02 10
323 00 02 41
325 00 01 80
327 00 06 45
326 00 02 25
266 00 00 32
264 00 03 09
246 00 08 16
247 00 00 27
245 00 04 09
240 00 08 28
237 00 05 26
235 00 04 54
134 00 07 82
136 00 01 02
144 00 07 83
145 00 00 20
15 00 09 87
3048 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
8 00 00 20
9 00 01 16
7 00 04 19
1 00 00 56
SARWAN PICHHI - 175 855 00 00 24
839 00 00 59
838 00 03 20
837 00 02 44
836 00 02 62
835 00 01 80
834 00 02 18
833 00 00 76
832 00 01 08
831 00 18 81
270 00 01 27
267 00 00 20
266 00 03 81
265 00 03 74
264 00 01 52
263 00 02 18
260 00 03 19
259 00 05 10
257 00 00 87
256 00 05 48
254 00 01 90
252 00 01 65
251 00 01 61
250 00 01 36
94 00 00 98
95 00 02 35
96 00 00 99
92 00 01 48
97 00 00 75
98 00 03 26
100 00 00 20
99 00 00 80
84 00 01 84
66 00 02 51
65 00 03 65
63 00 04 63
62 00 06 38
71 00 00 64
50 00 00 97
515 00 02 87
SARWAN UPARBANDHI - 176 22 00 02 77
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3049
11 00 00 36
9 00 03 68
12 00 00 20
8 00 01 83
6 00 01 57
5 00 01 74
3 00 03 65
4 00 00 54
1 00 02 85
SARWAN NAUKHILA - 144 1131 00 04 32
417 00 02 49
414 00 04 17
374 00 00 71
375 00 02 62
377 00 00 42
376 00 01 92
373 00 00 20
372 00 04 10
371 00 01 40
378 00 03 44
362 00 01 73
363 00 00 78
367 00 00 66
365 00 00 61
364 00 01 27
358 00 00 20
357 00 00 27
356 00 00 34
355 00 03 35
315 00 02 25
351 00 00 20
316 00 02 35
320 00 00 20
321 00 06 67
323 00 00 53
322 00 09 13
209 00 03 73
212 00 06 44
215 00 00 42
136 00 04 63
137 00 01 31
138 00 05 99
120 00 03 94
121 00 01 61
116 00 00 28
3050 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
73 00 01 29
74 00 00 20
69 00 00 57
76 00 01 98
77 00 01 86
78 00 00 20
58 00 00 63
61 00 01 24
60 00 02 29
59 00 00 45
62 00 03 25
63 00 01 13
53 00 02 47
SARWAN BAGICHA - 141 182 00 01 33
175 00 08 95
181 00 00 20
180 00 01 59
178 00 00 24
179 00 02 87
183 00 00 20
164 00 04 69
157 00 02 34
156 00 01 25
155 00 03 39
154 00 00 20
NAUKHILA CHHIT – 140
SARWAN 1169 00 01 34
1171 00 00 54
1170 00 02 62
1172 00 03 28
1173 00 01 63
1177 00 01 20
1175 00 03 55
1159 00 00 52
1158 00 02 84
1157 00 01 26
SARWAN SOBHASADI - 139 50 00 00 43
49 00 04 65
46 00 02 13
23 00 03 51
45 00 00 25
44 00 01 82
34 00 08 14
30 00 01 94
32 00 02 03
SARWAN TOLAYADIH - 138 4 00 08 45[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3051
SARWAN LASKARDIH - 133 738 00 04 23
694 00 02 72
736 00 04 07
735 00 02 66
661 00 05 83
663 00 00 20
662 00 06 84
658 00 00 20
657 00 00 99
305 00 00 47
306 00 01 07
307 00 01 08
308 00 00 85
309 00 01 03
310 00 01 13
311 00 02 26
312 00 07 44
314 00 02 25
315 00 02 55
327 00 00 64
326 00 01 66
324 00 01 18
328 00 00 24
323 00 02 73
322 00 06 43
321 00 00 20
338 00 01 58
339 00 02 49
340 00 03 24
341 00 00 23
243 00 00 39
242 00 02 86
241 00 00 52
244 00 00 68
245 00 01 08
246 00 01 84
247 00 00 20
249 00 00 47
254 00 00 59
251 00 01 49
255 00 00 20
252 00 00 95
250 00 01 81
234 00 00 20
232 00 08 72
3052 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
220 00 02 96
218 00 00 20
217 00 01 37
216 00 01 15
215 00 01 58
214 00 01 94
213 00 02 48
109 00 00 20
108 00 01 49
107 00 02 82
106 00 00 30
85 00 00 61
87 00 01 21
84 00 01 24
88 00 00 23
92 00 01 34
93 00 04 18
94 00 00 20
SARWAN NANDLAL DIH - 132 78 00 02 95
79 00 03 29
SARWAN BANDH DIH - 134 43 00 02 14
42 00 00 99
41 00 00 20
44 00 02 57
45 00 02 22
46 00 01 66
49 00 00 37
61 00 00 20
65 00 00 34
68 00 01 17
70 00 00 20
69 00 00 53
67 00 01 48
66 00 00 20
90 00 00 20
91 00 02 73
93 00 03 13
94 00 02 55
SARWAN KUSMAHA - 96 1532 00 03 25
1531 00 02 48
1529 00 01 89
1519 00 00 84
1528 00 01 64
1527 00 00 68
1524 00 04 56
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3053
1501 00 05 45
1495 00 00 33
1496 00 03 11
1500 00 00 86
1497 00 05 61
1629 00 00 61
1498 00 02 68
1479 00 00 20
1478 00 09 96
346 00 00 20
345 00 05 92
313 00 03 72
312 00 05 67
SARWAN SARWAN - 104 2388 00 00 20
1050 00 00 60
1049 00 07 05
1048 00 00 82
1045 00 03 16
1032 00 01 55
1033 00 01 24
1034 00 00 99
1035 00 00 20
1043 00 04 75
1042 00 00 40
996 00 05 32
997 00 02 60
993 00 06 00
992 00 00 20
990 00 09 11
991 00 00 20
2413 00 01 85
988 00 00 43
SARWAN PAHARPUR - 97 94 00 00 56
151 00 03 43
95 00 05 80
96 00 05 06
107 00 03 12
108 00 01 72
109 00 00 29
104 00 02 19
100 00 08 07
73 00 03 24
74 00 00 31
99 00 04 43
75 00 03 15
3054 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
34 00 01 84
37 00 02 77
33 00 04 76
38 00 00 24
31 00 09 32
SARWAN BISUNPUR - 98 156 00 06 32
118 00 05 90
119 00 02 68
121 00 02 19
122 00 05 63
123 00 00 20
124 00 00 88
126 00 03 73
128 00 02 27
130 00 03 50
129 00 04 76
134 00 01 02
133 00 08 54
136 00 02 54
97 00 00 66
141 00 03 43
143 00 01 82
142 00 01 67
146 00 09 11
105 00 19 51
101 00 00 52
104 00 04 27
SARWAN BAIDNATHPUR - 82 252 00 20 78
225 00 00 20
221 00 07 08
224 00 01 69
222 00 03 05
223 00 02 51
219 00 00 56
211 00 02 89
212 00 03 05
218 00 05 38
217 00 01 65
216 00 14 09
SARWAN HARLADIH - 22 146 00 11 74
151 00 02 30
147 00 03 53
152 00 06 72
135 00 01 25
134 00 05 27
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3055
378 00 03 22
124 00 01 20
120 00 01 68
117 00 03 14
116 00 02 46
115 00 05 08
111 00 06 67
113 00 00 20
108 00 01 48
109 00 00 20
89 00 00 68
87 00 10 95
86 00 00 26
88 00 01 21
59 00 00 68
24 00 03 35
23 00 00 44
21 00 00 20
22 00 03 19
19 00 03 78
18 00 03 95
16 00 00 20
15 00 01 86
14 00 07 12
13 00 04 02
SARWAN DULIDIH - 21 578 00 01 78
577 00 02 47
576 00 00 20
549 00 02 76
547 00 01 51
548 00 01 03
545 00 01 47
544 00 04 12
543 00 01 23
1 00 02 58
MOHANPUR KHAIRKHUTI - 657 668 00 01 75
667 00 00 35
669 00 00 82
672 00 01 95
673 00 06 59
674 00 00 50
677 00 01 29
645 00 05 60
665 00 00 31
646 00 01 88
3056 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
636 00 02 09
638 00 03 61
637 00 04 79
494 00 03 45
492 00 03 49
487 00 00 93
491 00 03 50
490 00 05 54
497 00 05 08
223 00 01 77
441 00 09 65
440 00 00 42
418 00 23 85
438 00 01 06
437 00 11 27
426 00 02 55
424 00 02 79
427 00 06 90
696 00 00 53
429 00 00 52
428 00 05 76
52 00 01 55
55 00 00 84
54 00 01 81
51 00 02 09
50 00 04 48
49 00 00 41
MOHANPUR JHARKHANDI - 646 989 00 00 67
988 00 02 12
984 00 02 06
986 00 03 45
985 00 02 51
980 00 02 57
993 00 00 40
978 00 17 35
976 00 02 33
975 00 00 40
977 00 00 20
MOHANPUR BANPOKHARIYA - 656 164 00 01 17
160 00 04 36
161 00 02 82
136 00 03 02
159 00 09 25
146 00 00 47
147 00 05 53
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3057
139 00 00 98
141 00 00 67
137 00 01 23
138 00 02 62
124 00 15 22
126 00 11 26
129 00 00 20
127 00 00 20
131 00 04 54
132 00 04 39
60 00 02 12
57 00 01 80
56 00 02 00
55 00 13 50
44 00 06 06
38 00 17 08
39 00 00 29
14 00 03 62
13 00 01 57
11 00 02 36
1 00 01 61
172 00 00 64
MOHANPUR GADIBALIYA - 655 117 00 04 75
119 00 00 20
108 00 05 94
106 00 01 57
MOHANPUR TIWARIKANARI - 654 15 00 00 20
17 00 01 77
14 00 05 14
13 00 07 17
6 00 05 23
7 00 02 41
9 00 10 85
2 00 02 34
MOHANPUR GADIBALIYA - 653 10 00 10 50
9 00 00 20
MOHANPUR KISNIDIH - 662 807 00 03 34
806 00 05 98
791 00 02 15
585 00 01 53
586 00 00 46
583 00 07 87
423 00 01 00
422 00 00 99
419 00 04 90
3058 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
431 00 03 27
433 00 08 50
532 00 03 68
440 00 01 40
441 00 00 49
447 00 00 49
451 00 12 61
530 00 00 20
459 00 04 40
452 00 00 51
453 00 02 07
454 00 00 20
455 00 00 30
525 00 00 90
456 00 02 37
458 00 00 84
457 00 05 38
515 00 01 14
506 00 00 52
514 00 00 20
512 00 03 96
511 00 00 25
510 00 00 76
497 00 04 56
495 00 00 54
496 00 02 94
481 00 03 04
482 00 00 20
485 00 00 20
483 00 05 74
488 00 00 31
374 00 15 44
MOHANPUR SIMRAPOJ - 652 41 00 01 49
3 00 00 93
42 00 00 20
MOHANPUR NARHI - 663 301 00 01 07
316 00 02 32
317 00 10 33
315 00 10 18
306 00 01 47
314 00 03 31
313 00 15 37
MOHANPUR PAKARIYA - 674 348 00 01 60
349 00 04 35
350 00 03 21
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3059
352 00 00 57
356 00 01 90
330 00 03 02
329 00 03 24
331 00 00 20
328 00 11 47
326 00 07 43
327 00 00 32
323 00 06 39
322 00 00 34
MOHANPUR DHAKODIH - 665 425 00 00 36
424 00 01 80
423 00 09 69
480 00 03 25
415 00 01 39
481 00 03 58
403 00 00 57
414 00 08 16
479 00 00 20
412 00 00 20
411 00 04 57
410 00 05 61
409 00 01 84
413 00 08 15
308 00 08 58
310 00 09 71
311 00 00 88
309 00 00 90
477 00 01 60
MOHANPUR NAWADIH - 673 35 00 00 20
34 00 00 64
33 00 01 29
40 00 01 27
31 00 03 36
29 00 11 20
30 00 01 81
28 00 05 04
MOHANPUR SIRSA - 672 76 00 07 38
73 00 29 10
55 00 00 20
50 00 01 71
49 00 03 70
47 00 01 44
48 00 00 25
11 00 09 84
3060 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MOHANPUR GORSIGHA - 671 10 00 19 23
11 00 18 48
MOHANPUR HARKATA - 678 200 00 08 43
202 00 02 63
203 00 04 09
204 00 01 96
205 00 00 54
206 00 04 86
186 00 08 47
188 00 02 23
194 00 08 97
189 00 00 53
MOHANPUR MEDNIDIH - 681 495 00 07 89
514 00 00 55
511 00 01 98
526 00 07 71
524 00 08 65
515 00 08 14
356 00 02 04
455 00 01 18
456 00 01 21
440 00 08 88
446 00 00 32
445 00 04 11
444 00 00 20
443 00 03 47
442 00 00 91
413 00 03 00
417 00 06 83
416 00 00 20
404 00 06 95
402 00 05 52
390 00 00 33
401 00 01 31
399 00 02 56
400 00 00 21
398 00 01 20
MOHANPUR RANGA MODICHAK - 705 52 00 00 49
11 00 03 32
5 00 03 58
10 00 00 20
9 o 01 14
8 00 00 77
12 00 10 97
51 00 02 17
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3061
48 00 20 84
3 00 00 84
2 00 05 37
MOHANPUR SINGARDIH - 702 378 00 19 83
MOHANPUR BIRHABARAN - 704 113 00 02 48
112 00 01 76
109 00 12 07
103 00 02 44
102 00 09 85
93 00 01 43
96 00 05 01
100 00 01 35
99 00 04 58
20 00 03 62
6 00 02 21
7 00 12 19
1 00 05 14
2 00 00 20
MOHANPUR PATHAR CHAPTI - 703 25 00 29 67
MOHANPUR THARHI - 688 677 00 00 33
501 00 04 30
676 00 00 31
515 00 09 01
493 00 00 20
492 00 05 18
491 00 00 43
490 00 00 82
486 00 00 62
485 00 02 44
487 00 06 08
474 00 02 45
488 00 00 45
473 00 00 81
472 00 01 17
471 00 00 86
468 00 00 38
469 00 00 20
470 00 01 97
443 00 04 26
445 00 02 33
447 00 00 20
446 00 00 37
419 00 03 21
367 00 05 93
364 00 00 20
3062 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
355 00 05 97
307 00 00 31
305 00 05 38
300 00 07 03
301 00 00 20
302 00 01 03
239 00 02 25
201 00 05 23
202 00 02 65
203 00 06 45
206 00 00 97
207 00 01 02
167 00 03 60
165 00 06 81
MOHANPUR BAGHMARI - 687 32 00 05 28
30 00 23 40
21 00 09 27
22 00 04 77
5 00 01 00
4 00 09 65
2 00 01 10
1 00 02 33
MOHANPUR ATHMURIA - 691 93 00 00 25
292 00 01 01
MOHANPUR AMGARIA - 578 386 00 01 27
385 00 00 56
387 00 20 33
355 00 00 22
300 00 03 77
375 00 01 43
374 00 01 13
356 00 00 29
301 00 02 35
354 00 04 81
353 00 05 10
313 00 03 47
314 00 03 02
312 00 00 20
316 00 07 56
197 00 00 20
196 00 04 23
198 00 03 00
195 00 05 99
201 00 00 84
202 00 00 73
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3063
156 00 05 43
133 00 09 05
394 00 01 99
155 00 00 65
138 00 00 20
135 00 03 70
134 00 01 10
128 00 04 93
MOHANPUR PUNASIYA - 579 668 00 06 24
669 00 01 75
393 00 01 45
675 00 09 06
674 00 05 83
679 00 10 78
680 00 03 13
681 00 01 21
701 00 02 01
702 00 08 42
392 00 01 13
704 00 01 36
705 00 02 61
706 00 02 38
707 00 01 73
380 00 00 24
379 00 04 14
378 00 00 74
376 00 01 16
359 00 00 64
357 00 00 21
358 00 01 48
360 00 00 20
345 00 00 26
344 00 01 28
343 00 01 64
341 00 00 47
327 00 01 39
330 00 00 20
328 00 01 89
329 00 01 81
314 00 00 89
315 00 00 82
313 00 01 13
312 00 01 05
311 00 00 20
308 00 01 38
3064 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
302 00 02 61
1373 00 00 54
867 00 00 32
868 00 01 86
869 00 00 34
98 00 07 72
99 00 03 77
MOHANPUR BALSARA - 570 46 00 04 51
45 00 05 62
42 00 00 37
48 00 00 54
39 00 01 10
MOHANPUR BALSARA - 571 36 00 13 72
31 00 05 76
MOHANPUR KORA BANDH - 558 28 00 01 84
30 00 00 20
27 00 03 55
24 00 01 25
22 00 04 23
21 00 01 88
23 00 00 20
20 00 02 51
18 00 05 83
19 00 00 74
CHAK JAJBARA RANGATANR
MOHANPUR 73 00 06 34
- 557
MOHANPUR KUSUMBAD - 568 8 00 03 61
18 00 03 02
21 00 02 62
22 00 01 53
23 00 02 54
24 00 05 28
101 00 00 39
102 00 02 25
103 00 05 72
104 00 00 20
MOHANPUR HETH CHHOT BANDHA - 561 1 00 02 09
2 00 02 35
MOHANPUR CHAK NAWADIH - 556 8 00 02 46
9 00 02 84
7 00 02 53
MOHANPUR GAURIGANJ - 555 96 00 09 19
95 00 02 56
MOHANPUR TELIYA NAWADIH - 562 50 00 02 29
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3065
42 00 02 07
41 00 01 92
3 00 14 84
2 00 03 84
1 00 00 80
122 00 05 01
121 00 01 91
MOHANPUR KHAJURIYA - 420 63 00 20 60
44 00 00 42
39 00 14 47
36 00 00 20
38 00 03 48
34 00 04 00
62 00 02 28
A 00 67 80
61 01 11 57
DEOGHAR GHORMARA - 422 250 00 13 51
DEOGHAR PACHHIARIKOTHIA - 242 949 00 18 28
948 00 15 03
920 00 10 81
921 00 08 28
919 00 21 45
913 00 19 21
911 00 06 63
909 00 10 28
896 00 22 77
898 00 01 95
899 00 06 61
868 00 04 66
869 00 01 64
867 00 11 08
866 00 15 05
790 00 10 11
791 00 01 81
793 00 10 51
794 00 00 20
795 00 12 18
862 00 01 81
806 00 17 00
855 00 01 16
856 00 01 23
850 00 00 92
849 00 17 85
814 00 01 23
813 00 05 02
3066 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
820 00 00 39
831 00 20 21
832 00 09 65
834 00 15 91
836 00 14 28
339 00 15 14
338 00 07 14
99 00 00 20
95 00 26 10
957 00 00 86
DEOGHAR GAIRIBKHIL - 243 2 00 01 76
1 00 02 51
3 00 01 84
6 00 01 32
7 00 01 15
8 00 01 14
9 00 01 63
10 00 00 55
DEOGHAR SANKARI - 229 1250 00 01 97
1248 00 11 02
1251 00 06 69
1252 00 19 32
1253 00 01 10
1254 00 07 27
1255 00 08 06
1256 00 00 20
1227 00 00 20
1217 00 00 57
1226 00 04 59
1218 00 05 95
1223 00 07 57
1220 00 00 80
1222 00 08 55
1062 00 06 69
1063 00 12 81
1064 00 04 95
1065 00 02 77
1027 00 00 87
1028 00 00 36
1029 00 02 05
1030 00 00 23
1032 00 01 75
1031 00 02 94
1025 00 05 34
1026 00 02 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3067
1093 00 09 25
1094 00 02 06
1098 00 01 76
1099 00 01 92
723 0 03 49
472 00 06 51
473 00 00 20
471 00 08 71
464 00 02 83
465 00 02 04
463 00 03 61
462 00 01 41
461 00 01 02
458 00 00 20
460 00 00 36
529 00 04 64
540 00 04 33
80 00 58 11
82 00 02 67
52 00 01 11
DEOGHAR BASMANDIH - 228 2 00 00 49
5 00 07 49
8 00 07 35
9 00 00 24
10 00 01 02
44 00 03 44
45 00 03 01
43 00 00 93
41 00 06 08
42 00 04 17
22 00 02 12
23 00 01 06
25 00 00 30
24 00 01 30
18 00 05 63
DEOGHAR DEBPUR - 227 684 00 35 64
347 00 02 53
344 00 00 20
357 00 01 43
342 00 00 22
343 00 02 01
340 00 01 41
362 00 07 60
364 00 00 20
365 00 00 53
3068 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
389 00 03 95
391 00 00 20
390 00 00 92
385 00 00 68
386 00 00 20
249 00 04 07
395 00 00 20
DEOGHAR SARSA - 226 690 00 08 93
682 00 00 94
681 00 01 24
680 00 02 06
683 00 00 20
679 00 02 35
671 00 03 69
672 00 03 46
661 00 02 59
660 00 03 57
394 00 01 11
797 00 01 82
781 00 02 06
796 00 03 58
793 00 00 33
795 00 01 48
794 00 02 72
815 00 03 97
816 00 00 35
817 00 02 04
818 00 01 90
823 00 00 46
822 00 02 88
821 00 03 84
825 00 00 20
351 00 02 09
1209 00 00 20
1208 00 08 96
1207 00 00 92
1177 00 00 20
1206 00 01 29
1205 00 00 37
1203 00 03 61
1204 00 00 53
1202 00 00 34
1201 00 01 80
1200 00 02 57
1199 00 03 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3069
1197 00 00 64
1187 00 00 20
1184 00 01 03
1186 00 06 53
1172 00 01 69
1171 00 07 65
1393 00 07 39
DEOGHAR KHARHARA - 211 438 00 36 74
105 00 35 49
110 00 03 70
111 00 03 30
109 00 01 86
112 00 03 54
114 00 02 02
115 00 03 34
117 00 00 32
116 00 03 17
118 00 06 18
121 00 06 39
127 00 00 83
125 00 00 55
123 00 05 21
221 00 03 08
220 00 00 98
218 00 08 56
215 00 00 20
214 00 02 37
219 00 00 27
199 00 03 83
213 00 02 59
212 00 00 60
202 00 03 98
205 00 05 83
206 00 00 26
204 00 01 19
239 00 01 00
241 00 01 78
242 00 02 02
243 00 03 25
244 00 00 92
248 00 01 87
247 00 00 20
3070 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
287 00 22 42
283 00 01 76
281 00 00 77
280 00 05 97
279 00 00 26
482 00 00 71
288 00 11 97
484 00 06 05
2 00 04 97
DEOGHAR NAWADIH - 212 461 00 30 40
462 00 06 39
491 00 14 02
490 00 18 67
485 00 31 23
DEOGHAR SARASANI - 213 540 00 19 44
551 00 02 64
516 00 06 43
523 00 10 10
525 00 12 01
527 00 00 20
526 00 02 10
580 00 02 43
581 00 00 46
538 00 01 43
584 00 00 83
556 00 05 41
569 00 00 78
202 00 01 83
204 00 01 40
203 00 00 26
572 00 00 20
208 00 02 61
573 00 00 01
207 00 01 06
210 00 01 60
211 00 04 39
291 00 15 30
541 00 00 25
290 00 03 66
289 00 02 71
311 00 01 99
312 00 00 35
314 00 00 20
315 00 00 94
310 00 01 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3071
193 00 08 36
192 00 00 87
DEOGHAR PHUTABANDH - 27 186 00 03 26
181 00 01 85
284 00 00 38
DEOGHAR KENANKATHI - 7 98 00 06 42
97 00 11 72
96 00 00 29
90 00 22 16
89 00 01 09
88 00 00 81
74 00 31 22
73 00 26 87
48 00 20 09
49 00 53 72
50 00 01 29
DEOGHAR BADIYA - 8 20 00 00 28
22 00 00 88
469 00 49 72
670 00 02 14
468 00 01 30
428 00 13 74
668 00 12 81
669 00 00 20
427 00 01 43
24 00 09 11
23 00 48 53
25 00 09 58
DEOGHAR GHATIYARI - 9 595 00 23 47
494 00 00 20
495 00 08 46
496 00 03 37
497 00 10 95
498 00 09 57
500 00 00 56
484 00 20 50
485 00 25 42
480 00 07 96
471 00 02 89
472 00 03 79
470 00 00 20
469 00 06 75
150 00 00 89
178 00 04 11
177 00 03 77
3072 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
173 00 04 81
593 00 30 85
264 00 00 75
DEOGHAR BARHNIA - 11 409 00 15 60
441 00 01 01
414 00 22 85
406 00 03 17
404 00 04 67
316 00 19 61
341 00 00 34
342 00 11 91
348 00 01 33
343 00 07 54
344 00 01 67
349 00 00 20
248 00 08 50
247 00 06 78
246 00 10 71
47 00 03 54
46 00 00 84
42 00 03 77
48 00 01 13
49 00 00 20
41 00 05 18
30 00 04 25
29 00 03 29
28 00 02 00
27 00 00 46
31 00 02 23
16 00 00 70
15 00 01 02
17 00 01 39
18 00 00 92
553 00 03 07
13 00 01 03
6 00 04 16
1 00 00 82
[F. No. R-11025(11)/21/2018-OR-I/E-127764]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3073शु(िcid:4)शु(िcid:4)शु(िcid:4)शु(िcid:4)––––पत्रपत्रपत्रपत्र
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका.आआआआ. 770770770770....—के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार,,,, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाईप लाईनस (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 कि उप धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए,,,, भारत के राजपत्र सं.... 3 भाग II,,,, ख4ड 3,,,, उप ख4ड (ii) तारीख जनवरी 13,,,, जनवरी 19, , , , 2019 में पृष्ठ 396 में प्रकाशित भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना सं॰ का॰ आ॰ 103 तारीख 10 जनवरी 2019 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करती है,,,, अर्थात :-
उक्त अधिसूचना की अनुसूची में ::::---- पृष्ठ 396
अनुसुचीअनुसुचीअनुसुचीअनुसुची
| िजला : ब गूसराय े राज्य : िबहार िजला : बेगूसराय िजला : ब ब े े राज्य : िबहार | |||||||||||
| क क क क े स्थान पर | पढ़ेंपढ़ेंपढ़ेंपढ़ें | ||||||||||
| मौज़ा / ाम | अ ं चलअंचलअंचलअंचल | सवसवसवसव//// प्लाट प्लाट नम्बर | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | मौज़ा / मौज़ा / मौज़ा / मौज़ा / ामामामाम | अ ं चलअंचलअंचलअंचल | सवसवसवसव//// प्लाट प्लाट प्लाट प्लाट नम्बर | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग वर्ग वर्ग वर्ग मीटर | ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग वर्ग वर्ग वर्ग मीटर |
567 00 14 98 567 00 14 98 590 00 22 88 590 00 22 88 609 00 09 68 609 00 09 68 608 00 04 81 608 00 04 81 607 00 04 97 607 00 04 97 606 00 06 40 606 00 06 40
[फा.... सं. आर----11025(11)/1/2019/OR-I/E-28108]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव3074 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 770.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, number S.O. 103 dated 10 January 2019, published at page 398 in part II, Section – 3, Sub–Section (ii) of the Gazette of India No. 3, dated January 13 - January 19, 2019, namely:-
In the Schedule to the said notification: - Page 398
SCHEDULE
| District : Begusarai | State : Bihar | ||||||||||
| For | Read | ||||||||||
| Name of Mouza | Anchal | Survey / Plot No. | Area | Name of Mouza | Anchal | Survey / Plot No. | Area | ||||
| Hectare Are | Square Metre | Hectare Are | Square Metre |
Barauni 606 00 06 40
548
[F. No. R-11025(11)/1/2019/OR-I/E-28108]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. 771.—के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को लोकहित में यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि पारादीप (ओिड़शा) से हैदराबाद (तेलंगाना) तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन लिमिटेड के द्वारा "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन" िबछाई जानी चािहए;
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को ऐसी पाइपलाइन बिछाने के प्रयोजन के लिए यह आवश्यक प्रतीत होता है कि ऐसी भूमि में जो इससे उपाबN अनुसूची में वOणत है ओर जिसमें उक्त पाइपलाइन बिछाऐ जाने का प्रस्ताव है, उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए;
अत: अब, के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन्स (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, उस भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन करने के अपने आशय की घोषणा करती है;
कोई Vक्ति, जो उक्त अनुसूची में वOणत भूमि में हितबN है, उस तारीख से जिसको इस अधिसूचना से युक्त भारत के राजपत्र की प्रतियाँ साधारण जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी जाती है, इYीस दिन के भीतर भूमि के नीचे पाइपलाइन बिछाए जाने के लिए उसमें उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के सम्बन्ध में [ी दिल्लीप कु मार महांित, सक्षम प्राधिकारी, इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड, पारादीप- हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना, तृतीय तल, आलोक भारती टावर, शहीद नगर, भुवनेश्वर -751007, ओड़िशा को लिखित रूप में आक्षेप भेज सके गा I[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3075
| अनुसूची | ||||
| तहसील- कु कु ड़ाख4डी | िजला – गंजाम | राज्य - ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँव का नाम | प्लॉट नं. | क्ष ेत्रफल | ||
| हेक्टयर | एयर | वर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
अजु र्नपुर 23 00 03 10
92 00 14 54
94 00 04 20
95 00 06 59
84 00 03 50
97 00 19 30
131 00 13 99
128 00 09 62
129 00 03 78
130 00 02 50
136 00 00 50
साहाला 487 00 28 66
568 00 09 00
567 00 14 90
601 00 13 20
602 00 35 75
612 00 05 63
[फा....सं. आर----11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/ईईईई-13717]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O 771.—Whereas, it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip (Odisha) to Hyderabad (Telangana),"Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline" should be laid by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid and which is described in the schedule annexed hereto;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
3076 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty-one days from the date on which copies of the Gazette of India containing this notification are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land to Sri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project, 3rd Floor, Alok Bharati Tower, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751007, (Odisha).
| SCHEDULE | ||||
| Tehsil: KUKUDAKHANDI | District: GANJAM | State: ODISHA | ||
| Name of the Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq. mtr. | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
ARJUNAPUR 23 00 03 10
92 00 14 54
94 00 04 20
95 00 06 59
84 00 03 50
97 00 19 30
131 00 13 99
128 00 09 62
129 00 03 78
130 00 02 50
136 00 00 50
SAHALA 487 00 28 66
568 00 09 00
567 00 14 90
601 00 13 20
602 00 35 75
612 00 05 63
[F. No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3077नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 772-&dsUnzh ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd rfeyukMw jkT; ds lsye dks dsjy jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM+ dh dksfPp fjQkbujh ls rjyhd`r isVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy,] ,d ikbiykbZu dksfPp lsye ikbiykbZu çkbosV fyfeVsM+ }kjk fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,(
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa] tks blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] IksVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk "kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk"k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS(
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds jkti= dh izfr;k¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds fy;s mles mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh c'khjdqatw ,] l{ke çkf/kdkjh ] dksfPp lsye ikbi ykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM] d#.k ,aDyso] f}rh; ry] Mksj uŒ ch& 2] ,l ,u taD'ku] fjQkbZujh jksM] ;wfu;u cSad v'Q bafM;k ds lkeus] f=iqfuFkqjk] ftyk ,sjukdqye] dsjy & 682301 dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
| jkT; % dsjy | ftyk % ,sjukdqye | rkyqd % dqUukFkqukMq | ||
| uke xzke | losZ uEcj | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,fj;k | Áfr oxZehVj |
127@7 0 04 68 127@8 0 05 89 fdt+kDdEcye ¼[k.M la0 25½ 39@4 0 13 56 118@9 0 07 34
jkT;% dsjy ftyk% ,sjukdqye rkyqd% vkyqok
dht+ekM+ ¼[k.M la0 32½ 301@5 0 00 75 rsDdqEckxe ¼[k.M la0 30½ 226@6 0 04 85 djqdqqfV ¼[k.M la0 2½ 366@11 0 01 23
ewDdUuwj ¼[k.M la0 15½ 252@8 0 03 72
295@2 0 03 95
jkT;% dsjy ftyk% f='kwj rkyqd% eqdqaniqje
ikjkiwDdkjk 80@1 0 01 00 82@2 0 03 40 82@3 0 01 00
874@4 0 01 60 874@6 0 00 20
875@1&1 0 01 40
875@1&3 0 01 44 877@7 0 06 903078 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
jkT;% dsjy ftyk% f='kwj rkyqd% pkyDdqMh
pkyDdqMh if'pe 282@2 0 19 58
fd"kDdeqjh ¼[k.M la0 49½ 859@9 0 02 46
859@10 0 07 45
jkT;% dsjy ftyk% ikykdkM rkyqd% ikykdkM
dksMqEck ¼[kaM la 47 ½ 46@5 0 02 60
46@6 0 02 60
dUukMh&2 ¼[kaM la 50 ½ 487@13 0 02 60
487@14 0 02 10
487@15 0 02 10
487@16 0 03 10
487@18 0 02 20
vkykiYyh&1 ¼[kaM la 40½ 181@5 0 00 90
181@6 0 01 10
181@9 0 00 80
181@10 0 00 75
vkykiYyh&2 ¼[kaM la 40½ 169@6 0 01 10
169@7 0 02 60
173@2 0 04 35
jkT;% dsjy ftyk% ikykdkM rkyqd% vkykFkwj
vkykFkwj ¼[kaM la 28 ½ 65@2 0 01 70
65@5 0 02 40
65@7 0 04 45
65@10 0 01 10
65@11 0 01 70
65@15 0 01 25
65@16 0 01 25
192@3 0 03 80
192@4 0 08 00
192@5 0 08 20
193@6 0 03 10
okMDdupsjh&1 ¼[kaM la 44 ½ 108@2 0 02 60
okMDdupsjh&2 ¼[kaM la 34 ½ 677@2 0 07 70
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3079
677@4 0 03 60
,sjhe;wj&1 ¼[kaM la 21 ½ 56@1 0 01 30
56@8 0 02 10
[फा.... सं. आर----12031/196/2017-ओआर- I/ ईईईई.-19746]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 772.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamil Nadu and that the pipeline should be laid by M/S. Kochi – Salem pipeline Private Ltd;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the lands under which such pipelines are proposed to be laid described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now therefore in the exercise of powers conferred by sub section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (Central Act 50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person, interested in land described in the said Schedule may, within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying or the pipeline under the land to Sri. Basheerkunju. A, Competent Authority, Kochi-Salem Pipeline Private Ltd, Karun Enclave 2nd floor, Door No. B2, S. N. Junction, Refinery Road, Opp: Union Bank of India, Tripunithura, Pin – 682 301.
SCHEDULE
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM TALUK : KUNNATHUNADU
| V ILLAGE | SURVEY NUMBERS | AREA (APPROXIMATE) | ||
| HECTARES | ARES | SQ:METERS |
MARAMPILLY
BLOCK. NO. 24 127/6 0 04 61
127/7 0 04 68
127/8 0 05 89
KIZHAKKAMBALAM
BLOCK. NO. 25 39/4 0 13 56
118/9 0 07 34
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM TALUK : ALUVA
KEEZHMADU BLOCK. NO. 32 301/5 0 00 75 THEKKUMBHAGAM BLOCK. NO. 30 226/6 0 04 85 KARUKUTTY BLOCK. NO. 2 366/11 0 01 233080 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MOOKKANNOOR
BLOCK. NO. 15 252/8 0 03 72
295/2 0 03 95
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : THRISSUR TALUK : MUKUNDAPURAM
PARAPPUKKARA
80/1 0 01 00
82/2 0 03 40
82/3 0 01 00
874/4 0 01 60
874/6 0 00 20
875/1-1 0 01 40
875/1-3 0 01 44
877/7 0 06 90
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : THRISSUR TALUK : CHALAKKUDY
WEST CHALAKKUDY 282/2 0 19 58
KIZHAKKUMMURI
BLOCK. NO. 49 859/9 0 02 46
859/10 0 07 45
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : PALAKKAD TALUK : PALAKKAD
KODUMBU
BLOCK. NO. 47 46/5 0 02 60
46/6 0 02 60
KANNADI-II
BLOCK. NO. 50 487/13 0 02 60
487/14 0 02 10
487/15 0 02 10
487/16 0 03 10
487/18 0 02 20
ELAPPULLY- I
BLOCK. NO. 40 181/5 0 00 90
181/6 0 01 10
181/9 0 00 80
181/10 0 00 75
ELAPPULLY- II
BLOCK. NO. 40 169/6 0 01 10
169/7 0 02 60
173/2 0 04 35
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : PALAKKAD TALUK : ALATHUR
ALATHUR
BLOCK. NO. 28 65/2 0 01 70
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3081
65/5 0 02 40 65/7 0 04 45 65/10 0 01 10 65/11 0 01 70 65/15 0 01 25 65/16 0 01 25 192/3 0 03 80 192/4 0 08 00 192/5 ` 0 08 20 193/6 0 03 10
VADAKKANCHERY-I
BLOCK. NO. 44 108/2 0 02 60
VADAKKANCHERY-II
BLOCK. NO. 34 677/2 0 07 70
677/4 0 03 60
ERIMAYUR-I
BLOCK. NO. 21 56/1 0 01 30
56/8 0 02 10
[F. No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 773.—dsUæh; ljdkj us iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼ Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls bles blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k ½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e ,oa xSl eU=ky; dh vf/klwpuk laŒ dkŒ vkŒ 1583¼v½ rkjh[k 29@06@2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= laŒ 27 rkjh[k 2@07@2017 ls 08@07@2017] dkŒ vkŒ 2515¼v½ rkjh[k 11@10@2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= laŒ 43 rkjh[k 22@10@2017 ls 28@10@2017] dkŒ vkŒ 2515¼v½ rkjh[k 11@10@2017 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= laŒ 43 rkjh[k 22@10@2017 ls 28@10@2017] dkŒ vkŒ 1444¼v½ rkjh[k 03@10@2018 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= laŒ 39 rkjh[k 30@09@2018 ls 06@10@2018] dkŒ vkŒ 1445¼v½ rkjh[k 03@10@2018 tks Hkkjr ds jkti= laŒ 39 rkjh[k 30@09@2018 ls 06@10@2018 dks çdkf'kr dh xbZ Fkh ] }kjk ml vf/klwpuk es layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe es dsjy jkT; es Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM dh dksfPp fjQkujh ls lsye rd æfor iSVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy, dksfPp dks;EcVwj lsye ikbiykbu ifj;kstuk ds ek/;e ls dksfPp lsye ikbiykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM }kjk ,d ikbiykbu fcNkus ds ç;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh(
vkSj mä jkti= vf/klwpuk dh çfr;ka turk dks rkjh[k Øe'k 18@08@2017 ls 08@09@2017] 03@01@2018 ls 24@01@2018] 03@01@2018 ls 24@01@2018] 15@12@2018 ls 05@01@2019] 15@12@2018 ls 05@01@2019 ds chp miyC/k djk nh xbZ Fkh(
vkSj l{ke çkf/kdkjh us] mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu ] dsaæh; ljdkj dks viuh fjiksVZ ns nh gS(
vkSj dsaæh; ljdkj us ] mä fjiksVZ ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~] vkSj ;g lek/kku gks tkus ij dh mä Hkwfe ikbiykbu fcNkus ds fy, visf{kr gS ]mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus dk fofu'p; fd;k gS(3082 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] vr% vc dsanh; ljdkj] mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk çnÙk 'kfä;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] ;g ?kks"k.kk djrh gS fd bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwph es fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbu fcNkus ds mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tkrk gS(
vkSj dsaæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e fd /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk çnÙk 'kfä;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k nsrh gS fd mä Hkwfe es mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds çdk'ku fd rkjh[k dks dsaæh; ljdkj es fufgr gksus fd ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä ] dksfPp lsye ikbiykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM es fufgr gksxkA
vuqlwph
| uke xzke | losZ uEcj | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,fj;k | OkxZehVj |
ewDdUuwj ¼[k.M la- 15½ 252@8 0 02 88
258@1 0 10 00
258@6 0 03 05
259@2 0 16 40
259@8 0 06 55
259@9 0 03 25
259@11 0 04 00
260@2 0 02 50
260@3 0 02 20
260@4 0 02 15
260@5 0 01 84
260@6 0 02 46
260@7 0 00 97
260@11 0 02 28
260@12 0 00 78
260@13 0 03 62
260@14 0 04 95
260@15 0 02 75
260@17 0 01 45
260@18 0 01 54
260@21 0 03 65
294@6 0 08 22
294@7 0 00 90
295@1 0 02 38
295@4 0 01 10
295@6 0 00 15
295@7 0 03 17
295@11 0 04 18
295@13 0 02 60
296@1 0 03 00
296@2 0 01 45
296@3 0 01 30
296@5 0 02 65
296@7 0 02 98
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3083
ewDdUuwj ¼[k.M la0 15½ 296@8 0 01 90
296@9 0 03 78
297@1 0 02 50
297@2 0 01 74
297@3 0 01 93
297@4 0 03 12
297@5 0 01 53
297@6 0 01 47
298@1 0 09 10
298@3 0 00 12
298@4 0 01 48
298@6 0 00 60
298@7 0 01 75
298@8 0 01 70
298@9 0 03 48
298@11 0 03 20
298@12 0 00 70
298@13 0 02 40
okt+dqye ¼[k.M la0 24½ 61@9 0 02 13
61@12 0 01 18
61@18 0 02 71
61@19 0 00 21
dqUukFkqukMw ¼[k.M la0 36½ 305@7 0 03 53
339@2 0 12 87
jkT;: dsjy ftyk: f='kwj rkyqd : pkyDdqVh
fd"kDdeqjh 841@4 0 00 35
841@5 0 00 45
859@9 0 04 72
859@10 0 00 35
859@13 0 02 55
862@2 0 00 46
jkT;: dsjy ftyk: f='kwj rkyqd : eqdqaniqje
usUefuDdjk 445 0 02 70
446 0 02 70
449 0 04 50
450 0 14 40
464 0 07 20
[फा.... सं. आर----12031/196/2017-ओ----आर-I/ ईईईई.-19746]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव3084 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 773.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Act S.O. No 1583 dated 29.06.2017 published in Govt. of India Gazette No. 27 dated 02.07.2017 to 08.07.2017, S.O. No. 2515 dated 11.10.2017 published in Govt. of India Gazette No. 43 dated 22.10.2017 to 28.10.2017, S.O. No. 2515 dated 11.10.2017 published in Govt. of India Gazette No. 43 dated 22.10.2017 to 28.10.2017, S.O. No.1444 dated 03.10.2018 published in Govt. of India Gazette No. 39 dated 30.09.2018 to 06.10.2018 and S.O. No.1445 dated 03.10.2018 published in Govt. of India Gazette No. 39 dated 30.09.2018 to 06.10.2018. issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in the Land) Act, 1962 (Central Act 50 of 1962) (herein after referred to as said Act), the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of User in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamilnadu.
AND, Whereas, the copies of the said Gazette notifications have been made available to the public between 18.08.2017 to 08.09.2017, 03.01.2018 to 24.01.2018, 03.01.2018 to 24.01.2018, 15.12.2018 to 05.01.2019, 15.12.2018 to 05.01.2019 respectively.
AND, Whereas, the Competent Authority in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act has submitted his report to the Central Government.
AND, Whereas, the Central Government, after considering the said report, is satisfied that the Right of User in the said land specified in the Schedule appended should be acquired.
Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declared that the Right of User in the Land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification are hereby acquired.
AND, further, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (4) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the Right Of User in the said lands shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government vest free from all encumbrances in the Kochi – Salem Pipeline Private Limited.
SCHEDULE
| V ILLAGE | SURVEY NUMBERS | AREA | ||
| HECTARES | ARES | SQ:MTRS |
258/6 0 03 05 259/2 0 16 40 259/8 0 06 55 259/9 0 03 25 259/11 0 04 00 260/2 0 02 50 260/3 0 02 20 260/4 0 02 15 260/5 0 01 84 260/6 0 02 46 260/7 0 00 97 260/11 0 02 28 260/12 0 00 78 260/13 0 03 62 260/14 0 04 95 260/15 0 02 75 260/17 0 01 45[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3085
260/18 0 01 54
260/21 0 03 65
294/6 0 08 22
294/7 0 00 90
295/1 0 02 38
295/4 0 01 10
295/6 0 00 15
295/7 0 03 17
295/11 0 04 18
295/13 0 02 60
296/1 0 03 00
296/2 0 01 45
296/3 0 01 30
296/5 0 02 65
296/7 0 02 98
296/8 0 01 90
296/9 0 03 78
MOOKKANNOOR (BLOCK. NO. 15) 297/1 0 02 50
297/2 0 01 74
297/3 0 01 93
297/4 0 03 12
297/5 0 01 53
297/6 0 01 47
298/1 0 09 10
298/3 0 00 12
298/4 0 01 48
298/6 0 00 60
298/7 0 01 75
298/8 0 01 70
298/9 0 03 48
298/11 0 03 20
298/12 0 00 70
298/13 0 02 40
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : ERNAKULAM TALUK : KUNNATHUNADU
VAZHAKKULAM (BLOCK. NO. 24) 61/9 0 02 13
61/12 0 01 18
61/18 0 02 71
61/19 0 00 21
KUNNATHUNADU (BLOCK. NO. 36) 305/7 0 03 53
339/2 0 12 87
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : TRISSUR TALUK : CHALAKKUDI
KIZHAKKUMMURI 841/4 0 00 35
3086 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
841/5 0 00 45
859/9 0 04 72
859/10 0 00 35
859/13 0 02 55
862/2 0 00 46
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : TRISSUR TALUK : MUKUNDAPURAM
NENMANIKKARA 445 0 02 70
446 0 02 70
449 0 04 50
NENMANIKKARA 450 0 14 40
464 0 07 20
[F.No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 774.—dsUæh; ljdkj us iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ ¼ftls blesa blds i'pkr~ mä vf/kfu;e dgk x;k½ dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ ds v/khu tkjh dh xbZ Hkkjr ljdkj ds isVªksfy;e ,oa xSl eU=ky; dh uhps nh xbZ vf/klwukvksa esa layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa ikbiykbu fcNkus ds ç;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk dh Fkh;
vkSj dsaæh; ljdkj mä vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 6 dh mi/kkjk ¼4½ }kjk çnÙk 'kfä;ksa dk ç;ksx djrs gq,] ;g funsZ'k fn;k Fkk dh mä Hkwfe esa mi;ksx dk vf/kdkj bl ?kks"k.kk ds çdk'ku dh rkjh[k dks dsaæh; ljdkj eas fufgr gksus ds ctk,] lHkh foYyaxeksa ls eqä] dksfPp lsye ikbiykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM esa fufgr gksxkA
vkSj uhps nh xbZ vf/klwpukvksa eas layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe eas dsjy jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM dh dksfPp fjQkujh ls mn;eis:j esa bafM;u vk;y dkjiksjs'ku fyfeVsM ds ,y ih th IykaV rd æfor iSVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy, dksfPp dks;EcVwj lsye ikbiykbu ifj;kstuk ds ek/;e ls dksfPp lsye ikbiykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM }kjk 12 fd- eh- yEch ikbiykbu fcNkus dk dk;Z lekIr gks x;k gS blfy, bl vf/klwpuk esa dsjy jkT; esa layXu vuqlwph esa fofufnZ"V Hkwfe esa lHkh dk;Z lekIrh dh ?kks"k.kk dh tkrh gSA
vuqlwph
| Ø.l.a dk. vk. la. vkSj fnukad | xk¡o dk uke | rkyqd | ftyk | jkT; | lekfIr fnukad |
1 340 rkjh[k 01@02@2016 fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
dqjhDdkM+ ¼[k.M la0 11½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
d.k;Uuwj ¼[k.M la0 12½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
e.kdqUue ¼[k.M la0 19½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
2. 2175 rkjh[k 20@06@2016 e.kdqUue ¼[k.M la0 19½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
3. 3151 rkjh[k 03@10@2016 dqjhDdkM+ ¼[k.M la0 11½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
4. 3153 rkjh[k 03@10@2016 fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
e.kdqUue ¼[k.M la0 19½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
d.k;Uuwj ¼[k.M la0 12½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3087
5. 1690 rkjh[k 11@07@2017 fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
6. 2171 rkjh[k 08@09@2017 e.kdqUue ¼[k.M la0 19½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
dqjhDdkM+ ¼[k.M la0 11½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
d.k;Uuwj ¼[k.M la0 12½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
fr:okudqye¼[k.M la0 10½ d.k;Uuwj ,sjukdqye dsjy 10@01@19
[फा....सं. आर----12031/196/2017-ओआर-I/ईईईई-19746]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 774.—Whereas, by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas numbers S. O. and dates as mentioned in the Schedule below issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 6 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) the Central Government acquired the right of user in the lands, specified in the Schedule appended to those notification.
And whereas, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government vested the right of user in the said lands, free from all encumbrances, in the Kochi Salem Pipeline Private Limited.
And the work related to laying of 12 KM pipeline for the trasportation of LPG from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited to Udayamperoor Indian Oil Corporation Limited LPG Plant in the State of Kerala has been completed in the said lands. So, the operation may be terminated in the State of Kerala in respect of Said lands the description of which in brief is specified in the Schedule annexed to this notification.
SCHDEULE
Name of Village Taluk District State Date of Sl. No
S.O. No. and Date
Termination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. 340(E) dated 01-02-2016 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Kureekad (Block No.11) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Kanayannur (Block No.12) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Manakkunnam (Block No.19) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
2. 2175(E) dated 20-06-2016 Manakkunnam (Block No.19) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
3. 3151(E)dated 03-10-2016 Kureekad (Block No.11) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
4. 3153(E)dated 03-10-2016 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Manakkunnam (Block No.19) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Kanayannur (Block No.12) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
5. 1690 dated 11.07.2017 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
6. 2171 dated 08-09-2017 Manakkunnam (Block No.19) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Kureekad (Block No.11) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Kanayannur (Block No.12) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019 Thiruvankulam (Block No.10) Kanayannur Ernakulam Kerala 10.01.2019
[F. No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
3088 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 775-&dsUnzh ljdkj] iSVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 2 ds [kaM ¼d½ ds vuqlj.k esa] dsjy jkT; {ks= ds Hkhrj mDr vf/kfu;e ds v/khu] dksph lsye ikbiykbu izkbosV fyfeVsM ¼ds,lihih,y½ dh dksph dks;EcVwj lsye ,y ih th ikbiykbu ds fy,] rfeyukMq jkT; esa l{ke izkf/kdkjh ds ÑR;ksa dk ikyu djus ds fy, ds,lihih,y esa izfrfu;qfDr ij Jherh ,e byojfl] fMIVh dysDVj] ftudh fu;qfä uksMy vf/kdkjh dksph lsye ikbiykbu izkbosV fyfeVsM dks;EcVwj gSa] dks izkf/kÑr djrh gSA
;g vf/klwpuk tkjh gksus dh rkjh[k ls ykxw gksxhA
[फा....सं. आर----12031/196/2017-ओआर-I/ईईईई. 19746]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 775.—In pursuance of clause (a) of section 2 of the petroleum and mineral pipelines (acquisition of right of user in land) Act, 1962(50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby authorizes smt. M Ilavarasi, deputy collector, on deputation to Kochi Salem Pipeline Private Limited (KSPPL),who is appointed as nodal officer for Kochi Salem Pipeline Private Limited Coimbatore, to perform the functions of the competent authority, in the State of Tamilnadu for Kochi Salem Pipeline Private Limited's Kochi-Coimbatore-Salem LPG Pipeline under the said act.
This notification will be effective from the date of its issue.
[F. No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 776.—dsUnzh; ljdkj dks yksdfgr esa ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd rfeyukMw jkT; ds lsye dks dsjy jkT; esa Hkkjr iSVªksfy;e dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM+ dh dksfPp fjQkbujh ls rjyhd`r isVªksfy;e xSl ds ifjogu ds fy,] ,d ikbiykbZu dksfPp lsye ikbiykbZu çkbosV fyfeVsM+ }kjk fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg,;
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbZu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, ;g vko";d izrhr gksrk gS fd ,slh Hkwfe esa] tks blls mikc) vuqlwph esa of.kZr gS] ftlesa mDr ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus dk izLrko gS] mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu fd;k tk, ;
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] IksVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbu ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½] dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznÙk "kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] ml Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk"k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS;
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwph esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks bl vf/klwpuk ls ;qDr Hkkjr ds jkti= dh izfr;k¡ lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds Hkhrj Hkwfe ds uhps ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus ds fy;s mlesa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds lEcU/k esa Jh c'khjdqatw ,] l{ke çkf/kdkjh] dksfPp lsye ikbi ykbu çkbosV fyfeVsM ] d#.k ,aDyso] f}rh; ry] Mksj uŒ ch& 2] ,l ,u taD'ku] fjQkbZujh jksM] ;wfu;u cSad v'Q bafM;k ds lkeus] f=iqfuFkqjk] ftyk ,sjukdqye] dsjy & 682301 dks fyf[kr :Ik esa vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
| uke xzke | losZ uEcj | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,fj;k | Áfr oxZehVj |
iqFkSudqfjLlw ¼[k.M la0 37½ 205 0 30 00
jkT;: dsjy ftyk: ikykdkM rkyqd: vkykFkwj
vkykFkwj ([kaM la 28) 65@6 0 00 15
80@9 0 00 41[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3089 jkT;: dsjy ftyk: ikykdkM rkyqd: ikykdkM iqFkqlsjh e/; ¼[kaM la 34 ½ 567 0 06 40 568@4 0 03 20
[फा....सं. आर-12031/196/2017-ओआर-I/ई----19746]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 776.— Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that for the transport of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Kochi Refinery of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in the State of Kerala to Salem in the State of Tamil Nadu and that the pipeline should be laid by M/S. Kochi – Salem pipeline Private Ltd;
And whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying such pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the lands under which such pipelines are proposed to be laid described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now therefore in the exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (Central Act 50 of 1962) the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.
Any person, interested in land described in the said Schedule may, within 21 days from the date on which the copies of this notification, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein or laying or the pipeline under the land to Sri. Basheerkunju. A, Competent Authority, Kochi-Salem Pipeline Private Ltd, Karun Enclave 2nd floor, Door No. B2, S.N. Junction, Refinery Road, Opp: Union Bank of India, Tripunithura, Pin – 682 301.
SCHEDULE
| VILLAGE | SURVEY NUMBERS | AREA (APPROXIMATE) | ||
| HECTARES | ARES | SQ.METERS |
PUTHENKURISSU BLOCK. NO. 37 205 0 30 00
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : PALAKKAD TALUK : ALATHUR
ALATHUR
BLOCK. NO. 28 65/6 0 00 15
80/9 0 00 41
STATE : KERALA DISTRICT : PALAKKAD TALUK : PALAKKAD
PUDUSSERY CENTRAL BLOCK. NO. 34 567 0 06 40 568/4 0 03 20
[F.No. R-12031/196/2017-OR-I/E-19746]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
का.का.का.का.आ.आ.आ.आ. 777777777777....————के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार, पेट्रोलियम एवं खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में अधिकार के उपयोग का अर्जन)
अधिनियम, 1962 (1962 का 50) की धारा 2 के ख4ड (क) के अनुसरण में, नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तंभ 1 में उल्लिखित
Vक्ति को, उक्त अनुसूची के स्तंभ 2 में की तत्स्थानी प्रविष्टि में उल्लिखित क्षेत्र के संबंध में उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन सक्षम
प्राधिकारी के कृ त्यों का निर्वहन करने के लिए प्राधिकृ त करती है, अर्थात:-
3090 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
प्राधिकारी का नाम और पता
अधिकारिता का क्षेत्र (1)
(2)
[ी देवेन्(cid:9) प्रताप सिह-II, डिप्टी कलेक्टर, आगरा
उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सक्षम प्राधिकारी,
इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन लिमिटेड,
उत्तरी क्षेत्र पाइपलाइन्स
मथुरा - टू ंडला पाइपलाइन का संवर्धन तथा बरौनी - कानपुर पाइपलाइन
(बीके पीएल ) के गौरिया टी पॉइंट से इसका जुड़ाव परियोजना,
ई-160, प्रथम और द्वितीय तल, कमला नगर,
आगरा (उत्तर प्रदेश)-282 004
यह अधिसूचना जारी होने की तारीख से लागू होगी।
[फा....सं. आर----11025(11)20/2018-ओआर-I/ईईईई-27595]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 777.—In pursuance of Clause (a) of Section 2 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby authorizes the person mentioned in column (1) of the Schedule given below to perform the functions of the Competent Authority under the said Act, in respect of the area mentioned in column (2) of the Schedule:-
SCHEDULE
Area of jurisdiction (2) State of Uttar Pradesh
Name and address of the Authority (1) Sh. Devendra Pratap Singh-II, Deputy Collector, Agra Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Northern Region Pipelines Augmentation of Mathura-Tundla Pipeline and its extension for hook-up with Barauni-Kanpur Pipeline (BKPL) at Gawria T-Point Project, E-160,1st and 2nd Floor, Kamla Nagar Agra (Uttar Pradesh) – 282 004
This notification is applicable from the date of issue.
[F.No. R-11025(11)20/2018-OR-I/E-27595]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ.... 778778778778....————के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन्स (भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमें इसके पhात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1066(अ) तारीख[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3091 03.04.2017 िजसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 946, भाग II, ख4ड 3, की उप-ख4ड (ii) तारीख अप्रैल 06, 2017, का.आ. 1140(अ) & 1141(अ) तारीख 03.04.2017 िजसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 1012 , भाग II, ख4ड 3, उप-ख4ड (ii) तारीख अप्रैल 11, 2017, और का.आ. 813 तारीख 15.05.2018 िजसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 20 , भाग II, ख4ड 3, उप-ख4ड (ii) तारीख मई 20-मई 26 , 2018 में किया गया है। इस अिधसूचना में संलj अनुसूची में विनिkदष्ट आंl प्रदेश राज्य के छत्रय, ए.कोंडूरू, जी.कोन्डूरू, पेनुगंचिप्रोलु, वत्सवाई और जग्गoयापेटा मंडल कृ ष्णा िजला की भूिम में, ओडीशा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपqरेशन िलिमटेड के द्वारा rियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने के िलए अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी:
और उक्त राजपत्र अिधसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थs। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है।
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर िवचार करने के पhात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए अपेक्षित है, उसमें उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिष्चय किया है:
अतः अब, के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अिधसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनिkदष्ट भूिम में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत किया जाए:
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, यह निदqश देती है कि उक्त भूिम में उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपqरेशन िलिमटेड में िनिहत होगा।
| िजला: क ृ ष्णा राज्य: आन्,प्रदेश िजला: कृ ष्णा िजला: िजला: क क | |||||
| मंडलमंडलमंडलमंडल का नाम का नाम | ाम का नाम | सव नबर | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||
| ह ह टेयर े े ह ह े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4(4(4(4)))) | (5) | (6) |
छत्रय बुtगुगूडेम 53/8 00 07 24 छत्रय चनुबंदा 1516 00 02 52 ए.कोंडूरू माधवरम वेस्ट 185/1 00 36 34
220 00 50 53
जी.कोन्डूरू चेवुटूt 54/4 00 14 67
72/1B 00 02 75
72/1A 00 06 72
73/2B 00 01 94
73/2A 00 12 61 जी.कोन्डूरू कोन्डूरू 21/2 00 05 96 3092 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4(4(4(4)))) | (5) | (6) |
30/1 00 06 32
29/1 00 20 86
29/2 00 00 50
36 00 04 68
35/1 00 00 99
37/4 00 19 77
38/1 00 02 86
43/3 00 16 73
44/3A 00 13 90
44/2 00 12 33
44/4B1 00 05 71
44/4A 00 04 78
46 00 00 75
52/2 00 06 78
56/1C 00 05 00
जी.कोन्डूरू गuामनुगु 51/3 00 05 41
52/5 00 28 95
53/2 00 25 45
46/2 00 20 00
जी.कोन्डूरू मुनगापाड़v 148/A2B 00 08 34
जी.कोन्डूरू लोया 99/2B1 00 11 85
पेनुगंचिप्रोलु पेनुगंचिप्रोलु 328/1B 00 23 22
328/1A 00 23 31
वत्सवाई भीमावरम 434/2 00 00 53
25/2D 00 16 07
25/2C 00 04 72
30
25/1B 00 18
जग्गoयापेटा बल्सुपाडू 82 00 03 72
69/3C/1B 00 07 83
[फा....सं. आर----11025(11)252/2017-ओआर----I/ईईईई-21033]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3093
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 778.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 946 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)dated 06.04.2017 Under S.O. No.1066(E) dated 03.04.2017, No. 1012 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 11.04.2017 Under S.O. No. 1140(E) & 1141(E) dated 03.04.2017 and No. 20 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated May 20 - May 26, 2018 vide S.O. Number 813 dated 15.05.2018 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Chatrai, A.Konduru, G.Konduru, Penuganchiprolu, Vatsavai, Jaggayyapet mandals of Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telangana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip–Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government.
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in India Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
| District: Krishna State: Andhra Pradesh | |||||
| Name of Mandal | Name of Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Chatrai Burugugudem 53/8 00 07 24
Chatrai
Chanubanda 1516 00 02 52
A. Konduru Madhavaram West 185/1 00 36 34
220 00 50 53
G. Konduru Chevuturu 54/4 00 14 67
72/1B 00 02 75
72/1A 00 06 72
73/2B 00 01 94
73/2A 00 12 61
G.Konduru Konduru 21/2 00 05 96 3094 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
30/1 00 06 32
29/1 00 20 86
29/2 00 00 50
36 00 04 68
35/1 00 00 99
37/4 00 19 77
38/1 00 02 86
43/3 00 16 73
44/3A 00 13 90
44/2 00 12 33
44/4B1 00 05 71
44/4A 00 04 78
46 00 00 75
52/2 00 06 78
56/1C 00 05 00
G. Konduru Gaddamanugu 51/3 00 05 41
52/5 00 28 95
53/2 00 25 45
46/2 00 20 00
G. Konduru Munagapadu 148/A2B 00 08 34
G. Konduru Loya 99/2B1 00 11 85
Penuganchiprolu Penuganchiprolu 328/1B 00 23 22
328/1A 00 23 31
Vatsavai Bhimavaram 434/2 00 00 53
25/2D 00 16 07
25/2C 00 04 72
25/1B 00 18 30
Jaggayyapeta Balsupadu 82 00 03 72
69/3C/1b 00 07 83
[F. No. R-11025(11)/252/2017-OR-I/E-21033]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3095नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका.आआआआ. 779.—के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्रकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 186, दिनांक 30 जनवरी 2018, जो भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 03 फरवरी 2018, में प्रकाशित की गई थी,,,, तथा अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1759, दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर 2018,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 15 दिसम्बर 2018 को प्रकाशित की गई थी । इन अधिसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनीkदष्ट भूमि में पhिम बंगाल राज्य में "हल्दिया----बरौनी पाइपलाइन सिस्टम्स परियोजना" िजला 1गली में कyे तेल के परिवहन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अिधकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 24 सितम्बर 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थs;;;;
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है;;;;
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने,,,, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पश्चात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर की उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है,,,, उसमे उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिश्चय किया है;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए यह घोषणा करती है की इस अधिसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनीkदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए;;;;
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए,,,, यह निदqश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की दिनांक से के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए,,,, सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी;;;;
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम,,,,1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूOत के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उतरदाई होगा और पाइपलाइन से संबन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार के विtN कोई दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहs हो सके गी ।
| अनुअनुअनुअनुसूसूसूसूचीचीचीची | |||||
| 0गली राज्य : राज्य : प1िम ब ं िजला : 0गली िजला : प1िम बंगाल प1िम प1िम ब ब गाल ं ं | |||||
| थाना | मौज़ा का नाम | सवसवसवसव नम्बर नम्बर | क्ष े त्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रफलफलफलफल | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
697 00 01 08 690 00 09 84 691 00 02 42 687 00 06 063096 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
663 00 02 68
662 00 06 73
661 00 04 22
660 00 00 63
659 00 00 44
658 00 01 33
631 00 03 75
632 00 03 74
633 00 02 60
636 00 00 62
635 00 02 04
637 00 01 22
623 00 00 80
638 00 06 46
588 00 01 60
589 00 00 38
578 00 06 52
580 00 03 73
583 00 00 52
581 00 01 65
582 00 00 42
573 00 01 24
572 00 06 86
571 00 02 17
571/886 00 03 69
571/885 00 02 68
570 00 00 97
569 00 02 85
गोघाट - 1 मन्डलग़ँति – 28 921 00 03 30
925 00 02 35
920/1140 00 03 19
920 00 08 80
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3097
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
913 00 01 49 907 00 01 88 910 00 01 85 909 00 01 05 908 00 00 20 911 00 00 29 911/1138 00 00 20 891 00 07 69 889 00 04 23 888 00 03 31 988 00 04 30 989 00 02 77 990 00 01 23 1012 00 06 43 994 00 02 52 993 00 01 44 995 00 08 64 996 00 07 48 992 00 00 20 1005 00 01 64 1006 00 00 47 1004 00 05 09 1031 00 04 43 1033 00 05 78 1032 00 06 94 1046 00 00 85 1045 00 00 20 1047 00 00 20 1047/1156 00 06 00 1070 00 02 583098 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1051 00 02 94 1078 00 03 38 1050 00 03 91 1077 00 01 52 1076 00 02 46 1104 00 08 27
[फा....सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018----ओआर-I/ई----27779]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S. O. 779.————Whereas by the notification of the Government of the India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S. O. No. 186 Dated 30 January, 2018 published on 3rd February, 2018 and vide S.O. No. 1759 dated 7th December 2018 published on 15th December, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems Project" for the transportation of Crude Oil in Hooghly District in the state of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 24th September 2018.
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P&MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the
pipeline.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3099| District : Hooghly State : West Bengal | |||||
| Police Station | Name of Mouza | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Goghat - I Sekati - 29 696 00 08 26
697 00 01 08
690 00 09 84
691 00 02 42
687 00 06 06
685 00 00 51
270 00 00 90
806 00 06 49
663 00 02 68
662 00 06 73
661 00 04 22
660 00 00 63
659 00 00 44
658 00 01 33
631 00 03 75
632 00 03 74
633 00 02 60
636 00 00 62
635 00 02 04
637 00 01 22
623 00 00 80
638 00 06 46
588 00 01 60
589 00 00 38
578 00 06 52
580 00 03 73
583 00 00 52
581 00 01 65
582 00 00 42
573 00 01 24
572 00 06 86
571 00 02 17
3100 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
570 00 00 97
569 00 02 85
Goghat - I Mandalganti - 28 921 00 03 30
925 00 02 35
920/1140 00 03 19
920 00 08 80
915 00 03 92
916 00 01 23
914 00 01 98
913 00 01 49
907 00 01 88
910 00 01 85
909 00 01 05
908 00 00 20
911 00 00 29
911/1138 00 00 20
891 00 07 69
889 00 04 23
888 00 03 31
988 00 04 30
989 00 02 77
990 00 01 23
1012 00 06 43
994 00 02 52
993 00 01 44
995 00 08 64
996 00 07 48
992 00 00 20
1005 00 01 64
1006 00 00 47
1004 00 05 09
1031 00 04 43
1033 00 05 78
1032 00 06 94
1046 00 00 85
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3101
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1047/1156 00 06 00 1070 00 02 58 1108 00 04 91 1049 00 01 25 1052 00 00 20 1051 00 02 94 1078 00 03 38 1050 00 03 91 1077 00 01 52 1076 00 02 46 1104 00 08 27
[F.No. R-11025(11)/22/2018-OR-I/E-27779]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ.... 780780780780....————के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमें इसके पhात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उप धारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई, भारत सरकार के पेट्रोिलयम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना का.आ. 2083 तारीख
23.08.2017 िजसका प्रकाशन भारत के राजपत्र संख्या 36, भाग-II, ख4ड 3, उप-ख4ड (ii) तारीख 09.09.2017 में किया गया है। इस अिधसूचना में संलj अनुसूची में विनिkदष्ट ओिड़शा राज्य के तहसील : एरसमा, िजला : जगतसिहपुर की भूिम में, ओिड़शा राज्य में पारादीप से तेलंगाना राज्य में हैदराबाद तक पेट्रोलियम उत्पादों के परिवहन के िलये इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड के द्वारा rियान्वित किए जा रहे "पारादीप-हैदराबाद पाइपलाइन परियोजना" के संबंध में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के िलये उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने के िलये अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी;
और उक्त राजपत्र अिधसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को उपलब्ध करा दी गई थs। और उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अनुसरण में सक्षम प्राधिकारी नें के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को अपनी रिपोर्ट दे दी है;
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने उक्त रिपोर्ट पर िवचार करने के पhात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलये अपेक्षित है, उसमे उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का िविनश्चय किया है;
अत: अब, के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए एतद् द्वारा घोषणा करती है कि इस अिधसूचना से संलj अनुसूिच में विनिkदष्ट भूिम में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के उपयोग का अिधकार अOजत किया जाए; और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, यह निदqश देती है कि उक्त भूिम में उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी बिल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड में िनिहत होगा।
3102 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]| अनुसूची | ||||
| तहसील तहसील---- एरसमा तहसील तहसील एरसमा | िजला ---- जगतसिहपुर िजला िजला जगतसिहपुर | राज्य राज्य ----ओिड़शा राज्य राज्य ओिड़शा | ||
| गाँवगाँवगाँवगाँव काकाकाका नामनामनामनाम | प्लॉट प्लॉट नंनंनंनं.... प्लॉट प्लॉट | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग वर्ग मीटर वर्गवर्ग मीटर | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
फिरिकछिटाकन्धा 144 00 02 88 355 00 00 12 355/606 00 00 10 कं करदिआ 880 00 03 69 गड़कु जंग 140/2448 00 00 20 140/2450 00 00 10 140/2456 00 00 10 140/2447 00 00 50 140/2449 00 00 30 140/2451 00 00 23 140/2452 00 00 33 140/2453 00 00 17 140/2454 00 00 14 140/2455 00 00 17 बडबुदा 264 00 00 12 आिलगड़ 708/778 00 02 83 701 00 00 30 517 00 11 24 516 00 00 21 546 00 06 05 549 00 02 12 625 00 02 09 चकु िलआ 409 00 05 57
[फा....सं. आर----11025(11)236/2017-ओ----आर-I/ईईईई-13717]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3103
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 780.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, published in the Gazette of India No. 36 Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated 09.09.2017 vide S.O.Number- 2083 dated 23.08.2017 issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the Central Government declared its intension to acquire the right of user in the land situated in Tehsil- Erasama, District-Jagatsinghapur in Odisha State, specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipeline for the transportation of petroleum products from Paradip in the State of Odisha to Hyderabad in the State of Telengana by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited for implementing the "Paradip-Hyderabad Pipeline Project".
And whereas the copies of the Gazette were made available to the public. And whereas the Competent Authority has under Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, has submitted his report of Central Government;
And whereas, the Central Government after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of the user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user of the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vests on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
| SCHEDULE | ||||
| Tehsil- ERASAMA | District-JAGATSINGHPUR | State-ODISHA | ||
| Village | Plot No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq. Mtr |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
PHIRIKCHHITAKANDHA 144 00 02 88
355 00 00 12
355/606 00 00 10
KANKARDIA 880 00 03 69
GARHKUJANG 140/2448 00 00 20
140/2450 00 00 10
140/2456 00 00 10
140/2447 00 00 50
140/2449 00 00 30
140/2451 00 00 23
140/2452 00 00 33
140/2453 00 00 17
140/2454 00 00 14
140/2455 00 00 17
BADABUDA 264 00 00 12
3104 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
1 2 3 4 5
516 00 00 21
546 00 06 05
549 00 02 12
625 00 02 09
CHAKULIA 409 00 05 57
[F.No. R-11025(11)/236/2017-OR-I/E-13717]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 781-&dsUnzh ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd ^^iVuk & eksfrgkjh & cSrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu** ds varxZr isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk lkju] jkT; fcgkj esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gSA
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwfp esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gS] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh txnhश izlkn flag] fc-iz-ls- o l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ¼ ikbiykbUl fMohtu½ iVuk] ihñ,eñchñihñ,yñ 34] िनशी dqat] clar fogkj dkWyksuh] cksfjax jksM] ftyk iVuk] fiu% 800001] fcgkj dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
| ftyk % lkju jkT; % fcgkj | |||||
| ekStk @xzke | losZ @ Cykd @ la- ¼IyksV la-½ | lc&Mho&la- | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | vkjs | oxZ ehVj | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| uSuh Fkkuk uacj % 257 | 8816 8819 8815 | 00 00 00 | 01 00 00 | 89 76 88 |
[फा.... सं. आर----11025(11)196/2017-ओआर-I/ई-9925]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 781.— Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in District Saran in the State of Bihar for "Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline'' for the transportation of Petroleum Product;
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3105Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Jagdish Prasad Singh, B.A.S. & Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division) PMBPL 34, Nishi Kunj, Basant Bihar Colony, Boring Road, Dist. Patna (Bihar.) Pin – 800020.
SCHEDULE
| District : Saran State : Bihar | |||||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Naini Thana no. 257 | 8816 8819 8815 | 00 00 00 | 01 00 00 | 89 76 88 |
[F.No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका....आआआआ. . . . -782782782782....————के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाईपलाईन (भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमें इसके पhात उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया हैं) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1689 तारीख 27 नवम्बर 2018] जो भारत के राजपत्र तारीख 1 दिसम्बर 2018, प्रकाशित की गई थी द्वारा उस अिधसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनिदिष्ट भूिम में िबहार राज्य में पटना - मोितहारी - बैतालपुर शाखा पाइपलाइन के अन्तर्गत िजला सारन में पेट्रोलियम परिवहन के िलए इंडियन ऑयल कापIरेशन िलिमटेड द्वारा पाईपलाईन िबछाने के प्रयोजन के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार के अर्जन के अपने आषय की घोषणा की थी (
और उक्त राजपत्र अिधसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को तारीख 23 दिसम्बर 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी (
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने, उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारी (1) अिधन के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार कोs रिपोर्ट दे दी है (
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर िवचार करने के पhात् और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूिम पाईपलाईन िबछाने के िलए अपेक्षित है उसमें उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिhय किया है (
अतः अब] के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्र(cid:128)त्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए यह घोषणा करती है कि इस अिधसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनिkदष्ट भूिम में पाईपलाईन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए (
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्र(cid:128)त्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए, यह िनदqश देती है कि उक्त भूिम में उपयोग का अिधकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए सभी विल्लंगमों से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कापIरेशन िलिमटेड में िनिहत होगीA
पेट्रोलियम ओर खिनज पाईपलाईन अिधिनयम] 1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूOत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कापIरेशन िलिमटेड पूर्णतया उत्तरदायी होगी और पाईपलाईन से सम्बन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार के विtN कोई वाद दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहs हो सके गीA3106 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] अनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूचीअनुसूची
| िजला सारन िजला: : : : सारन िजला राज्य राज्य: : : : िबहार िबहार | |||||
| मौजा मौजा ////ामामामाम मौजा मौजा | सवसवसवसव / / / / ब्लाक ब्लाक / / / / संसंसंसं. (. (. (. (प्लोट ब्लाक ब्लाक प्लोट स ंसंसंसं.).).).) | सबसबसबसब----डीवडीवडीवडीव----संसंसंसं.... | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | आरेआरेआरेआरे | वर्ग वर्ग मीटर वर्गवर्ग मीटर |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| रायपुर बीनगाँवा थाना नंबर : 523 | 1399 1398 1400 1396 1395 1394 1390 1389 1388 1387 1386 1385 1052 1051 1050 1036 1035 1034 1033 605 606 607 608 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 07 01 11 08 10 02 04 02 03 02 01 00 18 14 08 17 00 12 04 04 06 36 05 05 01 01 01 03 03 03 08 | 11 67 31 26 59 44 22 39 47 60 26 40 64 33 14 39 48 53 46 37 34 70 85 22 47 44 44 24 24 24 43 | |
| 618 | 00 | 03 | 46 | ||
| 619 621 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 425 424 423 475 464 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 | 07 02 02 04 06 06 03 00 00 00 00 03 12 30 06 00 05 18 14 13 16 28 38 06 00 00 16 01 90 34 | 34 14 14 72 26 26 12 87 87 87 87 74 92 38 46 69 48 22 24 67 36 86 46 03 30 48 64 06 75 50 | ||
| िचरांद थाना नंबर : 503 | 1299 1300 | 00 00 | 05 00 | 52 91 | |
| इस्माइलपुर थाना नंबर : 509 | 38/216 | 00 | 01 | 05 | |
| िबशुनपूरा थाना नंबर : 314 | 1126 1129 | 00 00 | 02 05 | 39 85 | |
| 1128 | 00 | 00 | 89 | ||
| मोबारकपुर थाना नंबर : 317 | 1206 | 00 | 02 | 30 | |
| लोहड़ी थाना नंबर : 339 | 1282 | 00 | 02 | 72 | |
| फकु ली थाना नंबर : 260 | 1945 201 | 00 00 | 02 01 | 21 56 | |
| ट ेकनवास थाना नंबर : 263 | 2508 2507 2506 | 00 00 00 | 02 02 00 | 99 19 42 | |
| पोखर भिन्डा थाना नंबर : 236 | 263/959 | 00 | 05 | 41 | |
| सम1ता थाना नंबर : 234 | 4236 4187 | 00 00 | 03 01 | 06 10 | |
| कोपा थाना नंबर : 231 | 115 126 535 | 00 00 00 | 06 00 01 | 30 92 50 | |
| पीआनो थाना नंबर : 200 | 2067 | 00 | 05 | 04 | |
| साधपुर छत्तर थाना नंबर : 197 | 547 527 | 00 00 | 10 00 | 26 20 | |
| ब ेलसरा थाना नंबर : 152 | 361 365 362 | 00 00 00 | 04 06 01 | 08 01 13 | |
| दाउदपुर थाना नंबर : 155 | 554 | 00 | 00 | 63 | |
| लाकट छपरा थाना नंबर : 89 | 1393 1394 1386 1381 | 00 00 00 00 | 00 01 00 01 | 25 32 35 70 |
[फा....सं. आर.-11025(11)196/2017----ओआर-I/ई-9925]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3109
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 782.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas 1689 dated the 27th November, 2018, issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (here in after referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India dated the 1st December, 2018, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Patna - Motihari - Baitalpur Branch Pipeline" for the transportation of Petroleum Products in Saran District the state of Bihar by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 23rd December, 2018;
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date of publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P & MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
| District : Saran State : Bihar | |||||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Raipur Bingawan Thana No. 523 | 1399 1398 1400 1396 1395 1394 1390 1389 1388 1387 1386 1385 1052 1051 1050 1036 1035 1034 1033 605 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 07 01 11 08 10 02 04 02 03 02 01 00 18 14 08 17 00 12 04 04 | 11 67 31 26 59 44 22 39 47 60 26 40 64 33 14 39 48 53 46 37 | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 606 607 | 00 00 | 06 36 | 34 70 | ||
| 608 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 621 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 425 424 423 475 464 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 | 05 05 01 01 01 03 03 03 08 03 07 02 02 04 06 06 03 00 00 00 00 03 12 30 06 00 05 18 14 13 16 28 38 06 00 00 16 01 90 34 | 85 22 47 44 44 24 24 24 43 46 34 14 14 72 26 26 12 87 87 87 87 74 92 38 46 69 48 22 24 67 36 86 46 03 30 48 64 06 75 50 | ||
| Chirand Thana No. 503 | 1299 1300 | 00 00 | 05 00 | 52 91 | |
| Ismailpur Thana No.- 509 | 38/216 | 00 | 01 | 05 | |
| Bishunpura | 1126 | 00 | 02 | 39 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Thana No.- 314 | 1129 1128 | 00 00 | 05 00 | 85 89 | |
| Mobarakpur | 1206 | 00 | 02 | 30 | |
| Thana No.- 317 | |||||
| Lohri Thana No.- 339 | 1282 | 00 | 02 | 72 | |
| Phakuli Thana No.- 260 | 1945 201 | 00 00 | 02 01 | 21 56 | |
| Teknawas Thana No.- 263 | 2508 2507 2506 | 00 00 00 | 02 02 00 | 99 19 42 | |
| Pokhar Bhinda Thana No.- 236 | 263/959 | 00 | 05 | 41 | |
| Samhuta Thana No.- 234 | 4236 4187 | 00 00 | 03 01 | 06 10 | |
| Kopa Thana No.- 231 | 115 126 535 | 00 00 00 | 06 00 01 | 30 92 50 | |
| Piano Thana No.-200 | 2067 | 00 | 05 | 04 | |
| Sadhpur Chhatar Thana No.- 197 | 547 527 | 00 00 | 10 00 | 26 20 | |
| Belsara Thana No.-152 | 361 365 362 | 00 00 00 | 04 06 01 | 08 01 13 | |
| Daudpur | 554 | 00 | 00 | 63 | |
| Thana no.- 155 | |||||
| Lakat Chhapra Thana No.-89 | 1393 1394 1386 1381 | 00 00 00 00 | 00 01 00 01 | 25 32 35 70 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/196/2017-OR-I/E-9925]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
dk-vk- 783-&dsUnzh ljdkj dks ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd yksd fgr esa ;g vko';d gS fd iVuk&eksfrgkjh&csrkyiqj 'kk[kk ikbiykbu }kjk isVªksfy;e inkFkksZ ds ifjogu gsrq ftyk% n¢ofj¸kk] jkT;% mŸkj çn¢'k esa bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM }kjk ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkuh pkfg, A
vkSj dsUnzh; ljdkj dks ,slh ikbiykbu fcNkus ds iz;kstu ds fy, vko';d izrhr gksrk gS fd ml Hkwfe esa ftlds Hkhrj mDr ikbiykbu fcNkbZ tkus dk izLrko gS vkSj tks bl vf/klwpuk ls layXu vuqlwfp esa of.kZr gS] mi;ksx dk vtZu fd;k tk,(
vr% vc] dsUnzh; ljdkj] isVªksfy;e vkSj [kfut ikbiykbUl ¼Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/kdkj dk vtZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1962 ¼1962 dk 50½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi/kkjk¼1½ }kjk iznÙk 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] mDr Hkwfe esa mi;ksx ds vf/akdkj dk vtZu djus ds vius vk'k; dh ?kks"k.kk djrh gS(
dksbZ O;fDr] tks mDr vuqlwfp esa of.kZr Hkwfe esa fgrc) gS] ml rkjh[k ls ftldks] Hkkjr ds jkti= esa ;Fkk izdkf'kr bl vf/klwpuk dh izfr;ka lk/kkj.k turk dks miyC/k djk nh tkrh gSa] bDdhl fnu ds vUnj] Hkwfe ds Hkhrj ikbiykbu fcNk, tkus gsrq mi;ksx ds3112 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] vf/kdkj ds vtZu ds fy,] Jh jke ds'k ;kno] l{ke izkf/kdkjh bafM;u vkW;y dkWiksZjs'ku fyfeVsM] ¼ikbiykbu fMohtu½] fo'ks"k Hkwfe v/;kfIr dk;kZy; tuin & nsofj;k & 274001] jkT;% mŸkj izns"k dks fyf[kr :i eas vk{ksi Hkst ldsxkA
vuqlwph
| rglhy % nsofj;k | ftyk % nsofj;k | jkT; % mRrj izns'k | |||
| ekStk@xzke | losZ@Cykd la0 ¼IyksV la0½ | lc&Mho &la0 | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,;j | oxZ ehVj |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| jkmrikj rIik % dpqvkj | 528 v | 00 | 03 | 50 | |
| pdek/k¨ mQZ efB;k rIik % dpqvkj | 79 78 7 | 00 00 00 | 00 12 00 | 65 50 36 | |
| सरैया rIik % dpqvkj | 77 70 68 | 00 00 00 | 04 03 05 | 00 00 50 | |
| ?kVSyk xkth rIik % dpqvkj | 482 277 283 284 282 289 452 346 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 07 00 02 03 01 00 04 00 | 56 36 76 16 02 55 00 72 | |
| cM+gjk rIik % dpqvkj | 166 105 | 00 00 | 05 02 | 58 85 | |
| i¨[kj fHkaMk rIik % x¨cjbZ | 50 c | 00 | 03 | 00 | |
| rglhy % nsofj;k | ftyk % nsofj;k | jkT; % mRrj izns'k | |||
| ekStk@xzke | losZ@Cykd la0 ¼IyksV la0½ | lc&Mho &la0 | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,;j | oxZ ehVj | |||
| cjkjh rIik % xkscjbZ | 42 | 00 | 01 | 02 | |
| पोखरभिडा rIik %गौरा | 225 | 00 | 16 | 00 | |
| ijlk cjok rIik % xkSjk | 408 | 00 | 00 | 95 | |
| e UMsjk q rIik % /krqjk | 2 | 00 | 00 | 85 | |
| cjkjh | 112 | 00 | 01 | 39 | |
| rIik % /krqjk | 253 | 00 | 01 | 20 | |
| cSrkyiqj | 223 | 00 | 02 | 00 | |
| rIik % fljte | 315 | 00 | 01 | 40 | |
| rglhy % HkkVij jkuh | ftyk % nsofj;k | jkT; % mRrj izns'k | |||
| ekStk@xzke | losZ@Cykd la0 ¼IyksV la0½ | lc&Mho &la0 | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,;j | oxZ ehVj | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| jrfl;k rIik % cfyou | 910 | 00 | 01 | 02 | |
| Ykky pd rIik% ?kkVh rglhy % lyseiqj | 150 ftyk % nsofj;k | 00 jkT; % mRrj izns'k | 00 | 36 | |
| ekStk@xzke | losZ@Cykd la0 ¼IyksV la0½ | lc&Mho &la0 | {ks=Qy | ||
| gsDVs;j | ,;j | oxZ ehVj | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| veok rIik % lfB;kao | 260 447 21 | 00 00 00 | 00 13 21 | 36 60 78 | |
| ijklh;k djdVgh rIik % lfB;kao | 838 508 510 | 00 00 00 | 04 02 00 | 86 20 98 | |
| 506 | 00 | 01 | 40 | ||
| [ktwjh djkSrk | 633 | 00 | 00 | 36 | |
| rIik % lfB;kao | 632 631 | 00 00 | 01 00 | 19 36 |
[फा....सं. आर----11025(11)/16/2018-ओआर----I/ / / / ई-26860]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 783.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary in the public interest that a pipeline should be laid by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited in District: Deoria in the State of Uttar Pradesh for 'Patna- Motihari-Baitalpur Branch Pipeline' for the transportation of Petroleum Product,
And, whereas, it appears to the Central Government that for the purpose of laying the said pipeline, it is necessary to acquire the right of user in the land under which the said pipeline is proposed to be laid, and which is described in the Schedule annexed to this notification;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein;
3114 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Any person interested in the land described in the said Schedule may, within twenty one days from the date on which the copies of the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act, as published in the Gazette of India are made available to the general public, object in writing to the acquisition of the right of user therein for laying of the pipeline under the land, to Shri Ram Kesh Yadav Competent Authority, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. (Pipelines Division), Special Land Acquisition Office ,District: Deoria, Pin – 274001, State: Uttar Pradesh.
| Tehsil : Deoria | District : Deoria | State : Uttar Pradesh | |||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| RAUTPAR TAPPA: KACHUAR | 528 A | 00 | 03 | 50 | |
| CHAKMADHO URF MATHIYA TAPPA: KACHUAR | 79 78 7 | 00 00 00 | 00 12 00 | 65 50 36 | |
| SARAIYA TAPPA: KACHUAR | 77 70 68 | 00 00 00 | 04 03 05 | 00 00 50 | |
| GHATAILA GHAZI TAPPA: KACHUAR | 482 277 283 284 282 289 452 346 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 07 00 02 03 01 00 04 00 | 56 36 76 16 02 55 00 72 | |
| BADAHARA | 166 | 00 | 05 | 58 | |
| TAPPA: KACHUAR | 105 | 00 | 02 | 85 | |
| POKHAR BHINDA TAPPA: GOBARAI | 50 B | 00 | 03 | 00 | |
| BARARI TAPPA: GOBARAI | 42 | 00 | 01 | 02 | |
| POKHAR BHINDA TAPPA:GAURA | 225 | 00 | 16 | 00 | |
| PARSA BARWA TAPPA : GAURA | 408 | 00 | 00 | 95 | |
| Tehsil : Deoria | District : Deoria | State : Uttar Pradesh | |||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| MUNDERA TAPPA :DHATURA | 2 | 00 | 00 | 85 | |
| BARARI | 112 | 00 | 01 | 39 | |
| TAPPA :DHATURA | 253 | 00 | 01 | 20 | |
| BAITALPUR TAPPA :SIRJAM | 223 315 | 00 00 | 02 01 | 00 40 |
| Tehsil :Bhatpar Rani | District : Deoria | State : Uttar Pradesh | ||||||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | |||||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
| Ratsiya Tappa : Balivan | 910 | 00 | 01 | 02 | ||||
| Lal Chak Tappa:- Ghati | 150 | 00 | 00 | 36 | ||||
| Tehsil : Salempur | District : Deoria | State : Uttar Pradesh | ||||||
| Mouja / Village | Survey/Block No. | Sub-Div-No. | Area | |||||
| Hectare | Are | Sq.mtr. | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
| Amava Tappa : Sathiyav | 260 447 21 | 00 00 00 | 00 13 21 | 36 60 78 | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
| Parasiya Karkatahi Tappa : Sathiyav | 838 508 510 506 | 00 00 00 00 | 04 02 00 01 | 86 20 98 40 | ||||
| Khajuri Karaunta Tappa : Sathiyav | 633 632 631 | 00 00 00 | 00 01 00 | 36 19 36 |
[F. No. R-11025(11)/16/2018-OR-I/E-26860]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 8 मई, 2019
काकाकाका.आआआआ. 784.—के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइन (भूिम मे उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) (िजसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अिधिनयम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ. 2846,,,, दिनांक3116 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 31 अक्टूबर 2017,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 23 दिसम्बर 2017 को प्रकाशित की गई थी, तथा अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1763, , , , दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर 2018,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 15 दिसम्बर 2018 को प्रकाशित की गई थी। इन अधिसूचनाओं में संलj अनुसूची में विनीkदष्ट भूिम में झारख4ड राज्य में, "हल्दिया----बरौनी पाइपलाइन सिस्टम्स परियोजना" के अंतर्गत, िज़ला जमताडा में कyे तेल के परिवहन हेतू इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
और उक्त राजपत्र अिधसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को तारीख 05 नवंबर 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,,,,
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है,,,,
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार ने,,,, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर िवचार करने के पhात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूिम पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए अपेक्षित है,,,, उसमे उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिhय किया है;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए यह घोषणा करती है की इस अिधसूचना से संलj अनुसूची में विनीkदष्ट भूिम में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन किया जाए;;;;
और के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार उक्त अिधिनयम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते 1ए,,,, यह निदqश देती है कि उक्त भूिम में उपयोग के अिधकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की तारीख से के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार में िनिहत होने के बजाए,,,, सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड में िनिहत होगी।
पेट्रोलियम और खिनज पाइपलाइंन अिधिनयम,,,,1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपूOत के िलए इंिडयन ऑयल कॉपIरेशन िलिमटेड पूर्णतया उतरदाई होगा और पाइपलाइन से संबन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:9)ीय सरकार के विtN कोई दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नहs हो सके गी।
अनुसूअनुसूअनुसूअनुसूचीचीचीची
| िजला जमताडा जमताडा राज्य िजला :::: िजला िजला राज्य : : : : झारखंड झारखंड | |||||
| तहसील | गाँवगाँवगाँवगाँव | सवसवसवसव नम्बर नम्बर | क्ष क्ष े े क्ष क्ष त्रफल े े | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग वर्ग मीटर वर्गवर्ग मीटर |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4828 00 04 29 4835 00 04 10 4844 00 04 58 4953 00 00 20 4952 00 02 94 4949 00 23 68 4864 00 02 27 4865 00 02 86[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3117
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4886 00 05 33
4887 00 00 63
कू न्डहित सुदराक्षिपुर - 13 4894 00 03 92
4905 00 04 38
4906 00 04 30
4918 00 02 38
4907 00 04 29
4909 00 00 69
4910 00 01 19
4912 00 00 71
4813 00 08 71
4801 00 00 93
4576 00 00 20
4574 00 02 71
4573 00 02 41
4568 00 01 23
4569 00 02 99
4571 00 01 92
4570 00 05 10
4548 00 00 20
4543 00 00 20
4545 00 04 45
4542 00 00 39
4546 00 00 20
4541 00 06 07
4534 00 00 94
4536 00 01 48
4535 00 08 49
3900 00 00 77
4525 00 01 25
4524 00 00 27
3950 00 03 86
3948 00 00 48
3118 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3935 00 05 28
3934 00 02 13
कू न्डहित सुदराक्षिपुर - 13 3931 00 04 04
3930 00 00 20
3928 00 01 09
3960 00 04 10
3962 00 00 20
3963 00 01 81
3968 00 00 45
3967 00 05 40
3976 00 03 01
3975 00 01 51
3977 00 03 04
3974 00 04 04
3997 00 00 44
3998 00 01 50
4500 00 02 22
4499 00 03 07
4496 00 10 70
4486 00 05 32
4485 00 08 26
4484 00 04 54
2670 00 02 89
2669 00 00 38
2668 00 02 21
2162 00 00 82
2151 00 00 20
2152 00 03 74
2153 00 04 60
2150 00 08 90
2154 00 00 20
2158 00 04 44
5432 00 01 53
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3119
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2139 00 00 42
2118 00 00 42
कू न्डहित सुदराक्षिपुर - 13 2116 00 00 60
2117 00 06 28
2087 00 00 26
2040 00 04 25
2039 00 12 87
2037 00 01 02
2033 00 01 26
2043 00 01 44
2028 00 07 09
2027 00 01 33
2032 00 04 46
2021 00 02 65
2020 00 04 12
2026 00 12 03
2019 00 02 78
5381 00 01 75
2017 00 01 88
2018 00 04 43
5380 00 01 80
2016 00 05 64
2288 00 05 86
491 00 02 38
2012 00 00 20
2289 00 03 61
2290 00 04 67
2291 00 01 36
2293 00 06 72
2295 00 00 95
2296 00 02 87
2297 00 08 47
2298 00 01 46
3120 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2305 00 04 50
2306 00 02 44
कू न्डहित सुदराक्षिपुर - 13 296 00 03 67
295 00 06 51
300 00 00 20
301 00 02 40
305 00 08 09
303 00 02 44
304 00 03 72
315 00 01 54
314 00 02 24
316 00 01 21
317 00 03 62
318 00 00 20
320 00 06 45
353 00 00 78
356 00 05 25
355 00 11 71
357 00 00 53
365 00 06 37
367 00 03 78
368 00 00 20
369 00 02 25
370 00 01 32
371 00 05 90
387 00 01 40
386 00 00 53
385 00 03 97
377 00 04 33
378 00 01 03
कू न्डहित जोकपाहाडी - 38 1388 00 01 77
1391 00 04 44
1386 00 04 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3121
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1372 00 06 78
1371 00 01 90
कू न्डहित जोकपाहाडी - 38 1370 00 01 04
1375 00 02 14
1374 00 04 73
कू न्डहित िसगॉरपुर - 37 545 00 03 29
544 00 01 97
515 00 03 78
514 00 04 12
513 00 00 96
512 00 00 46
516 00 00 20
510 00 00 60
511 00 01 53
517 00 03 07
518 00 00 62
519 00 00 52
492 00 00 20
493 00 00 88
497 00 00 82
498 00 00 93
496 00 00 60
495 00 00 20
499 00 01 08
500 00 01 54
489 00 00 20
483 00 01 67
488 00 01 06
487 00 01 48
486 00 00 76
485 00 00 20
476 00 10 67
3122 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
471 00 00 20
470 00 03 76
कू न्डहित पॉचम1िल - 36 624 00 03 58
604 00 02 30
606 00 00 35
603 00 01 32
605 00 00 20
602 00 00 29
601 00 02 56
600 00 01 61
599 00 02 66
589 00 02 55
597 00 01 95
598 00 00 53
596 00 02 43
595 00 00 20
594 00 00 80
591 00 04 97
592 00 00 66
584 00 01 18
581 00 04 75
579 00 00 20
582 00 01 94
345 00 02 06
344 00 01 96
340 00 00 91
339 00 00 37
335 00 11 51
369 00 00 88
370 00 00 37
371 00 02 62
332 00 01 39
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3123
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
305 00 03 40
304 00 01 93
कू न्डहित पॉचम1िल - 36 299 00 01 51
301 00 02 04
302 00 01 56
300 00 00 20
207 00 00 20
206 00 04 37
174 00 00 25
205 00 00 20
212 00 00 67
202 00 09 87
194 00 01 19
192 00 01 34
195 00 01 74
183 00 01 63
184 00 02 36
185 00 00 20
628 00 00 20
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 3337 00 04 13
3338 00 02 24
3347 00 00 69
3348 00 02 42
3349 00 01 27
3312 00 03 92
3376 00 01 52
3367 00 02 93
3375 00 03 51
3383 00 06 57
3382 00 00 67
3390 00 04 32
3386 00 04 52
3124 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3144 00 00 90
3142 00 06 67
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 3143 00 09 31
3148 00 04 11
3147 00 00 76
3149 00 16 55
3096 00 02 85
3098 00 00 20
3097 00 00 73
3095 00 01 08
3094 00 00 94
3087 00 02 44
3088 00 07 21
3080 00 00 20
3082 00 00 87
3081 00 01 26
3039 00 00 20
3038 00 02 13
3036 00 00 90
3035 00 00 87
3033 00 01 19
3043 00 01 53
3044 00 01 02
3045 00 01 21
3046 00 00 42
3047 00 00 20
3056 00 00 20
3023 00 00 20
3030 00 00 20
3024 00 05 55
3022 00 00 77
3021 00 00 98
2985 00 03 60
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3125
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2994 00 00 31
2996 00 04 65
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 3006 00 02 38
2979 00 01 98
1463 00 07 17
1464 00 01 29
1466 00 00 59
1477 00 00 95
1476 00 00 83
1475 00 00 80
1484 00 00 99
1474 00 00 20
1545 00 03 13
1548 00 00 51
1546 00 01 06
1585 00 00 87
1584 00 00 41
1540 00 00 14
1586 00 01 34
1587 00 00 20
1588 00 00 75
1611 00 02 97
1589 00 00 62
1610 00 00 22
1609 00 00 20
1620 00 00 28
1612 00 01 26
1613 00 01 49
1605 00 00 20
1614 00 00 49
1604 00 00 85
1603 00 00 50
1602 00 00 99
3126 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1699 00 00 58
1748 00 00 69
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 1703 00 01 45
1704 00 00 20
1726 00 00 96
1728 00 02 62
1731 00 02 49
1747 00 01 93
1736 00 01 89
1740 00 01 17
1737 00 00 20
1739 00 00 23
1741 00 01 15
4326 00 00 85
1178 00 01 68
1177 00 00 90
1176 00 01 40
1175 00 00 30
1160 00 06 24
1156 00 00 20
1161 00 02 34
4417 00 00 20
1154 00 00 85
1153 00 03 77
1152 00 04 17
1146 00 08 36
1149 00 06 10
1150 00 00 25
1089 00 02 61
1091 00 04 68
1090 00 03 61
1094 00 04 02
946 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3127
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
940 00 12 21
912 00 02 48
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 936 00 01 56
935 00 00 74
930 00 03 80
934 00 00 81
927 00 00 27
928 00 01 65
926 00 00 91
891 00 04 40
892 00 01 33
893 00 00 75
890 00 01 43
889 00 02 27
887 00 00 81
886 00 00 20
888 00 03 85
881 00 00 20
879 00 00 77
878 00 02 96
880 00 04 43
808 00 03 75
809 00 00 22
807 00 06 26
783 00 00 20
784 00 00 87
785 00 00 98
801 00 00 20
786 00 01 11
799 00 00 98
796 00 01 88
798 00 03 03
610 00 00 25
3128 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
443 00 00 56
445 00 00 96
कू न्डहित खाजुरि - 17 444 00 00 83
448 00 00 24
449 00 02 61
451 00 03 32
453 00 01 05
454 00 01 93
456 00 00 63
457 00 02 33
कू न्डहित िशमा - 15 802 00 05 20
801 00 01 41
797 00 00 38
कू न्डहित खयेरबािन - 18 572 00 10 54
570 00 01 45
452 00 00 59
80 00 21 21
390 00 02 48
343 00 00 99
342 00 00 71
331 00 01 37
121 00 05 37
674 00 56 31
181 00 01 52
188 00 01 71
189 00 03 06
212 00 00 20
213 00 00 71
201 00 08 60
665 00 01 59
कू न्डहित प्रसादपुर - 19 1321 00 02 46
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3129
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1186 00 00 20
1191 00 09 75
कू न्डहित प्रसादपुर - 19 1240 00 03 60
1241 00 01 28
1239 00 02 68
1237 00 01 65
1238 00 00 28
1236 00 02 01
1235 00 00 94
1234 00 00 35
1227 00 00 23
1228 00 01 23
1220 00 02 77
1229 00 00 50
1217 00 01 52
1219 00 01 26
1218 00 00 64
1216 00 00 20
1215 00 00 20
981 00 00 78
472 00 01 23
529 00 00 64
473 00 00 40
530 00 00 24
539 00 02 53
528 00 06 98
522 00 00 20
521 00 01 41
520 00 00 55
519 00 01 91
513 00 01 06
515 00 00 20
514 00 01 67
3130 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
506 00 04 09
678 00 03 03
कू न्डहित प्रसादपुर - 19 677 00 01 07
679 00 00 20
675 00 05 08
812 00 14 71
810 00 00 20
716 00 04 93
805 00 06 12
809 00 03 48
808 00 00 90
806 00 00 21
807 00 02 72
8 00 00 83
9 00 00 50
120 00 02 45
121 00 00 42
122 00 02 63
119 00 00 73
1328 00 07 93
117 00 00 20
118 00 02 88
10 00 04 41
11 00 03 75
5 00 15 52
31 00 00 68
32 00 01 98
34 00 00 20
95 00 05 49
80 00 01 27
41 00 04 88
1 00 00 47
कू न्डहित गड़जुिड़ - 10 2461 00 00 70
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3131
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2464 00 08 94
2477 00 00 20
कू न्डहित गड़जुिड़ - 10 2463 00 00 20
2462 00 02 57
2402 00 10 35
2438 00 02 78
2430 00 01 32
2431 00 00 79
2429 00 00 40
2428 00 01 80
2427 00 00 20
2425 00 00 20
2424 00 00 59
कू न्डहित पालाजुिड़ - 12 1652 00 03 12
1651 00 01 90
1644 00 12 03
1643 00 00 92
1636 00 05 31
1634 00 00 25
1635 00 05 94
1630 00 00 69
1631 00 04 82
1632 00 00 37
1617 00 05 30
1618 00 02 08
1616 00 04 29
1613 00 00 20
1612 00 01 99
1611 00 00 20
1621 00 00 55
1610 00 05 37
1526 00 11 43
1521 00 13 393132 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1517 00 00 57
1516 00 02 83
कू न्डहित पालाजुिड़ - 12 1513 00 01 31
1512 00 01 51
1511 00 01 35
1509 00 01 96
1508 00 03 14
1496 00 03 10
1494 00 02 07
1493 00 01 80
1491 00 05 94
1485 00 01 34
1488 00 01 16
1487 00 03 19
1486 00 01 59
97 00 05 74
98 00 03 00
100 00 00 20
101 00 04 26
102 00 01 45
118 00 07 59
112 00 01 14
113 00 01 16
117 00 01 74
124 00 08 25
122 00 00 11
123 00 04 07
162 00 03 25
161 00 05 11
160 00 02 07
164 00 01 84
169 00 06 38
156 00 00 48
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3133
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
173 00 01 72
177 00 02 61
कू न्डहित पालाजुिड़ - 12 194 00 00 20
193 00 01 73
195 00 01 19
196 00 01 13
197 00 00 20
201 00 07 68
205 00 02 74
203 00 00 57
कू न्डहित िजतुरिहड़ - 48 204 00 02 12
203 00 00 49
206 00 02 34
207 00 00 73
199 00 05 67
136 00 00 33
138 00 04 51
145 00 15 23
7 00 02 55
6 00 06 08
4 00 01 40
5 00 01 07
1 00 09 65
2 00 01 33
19 00 05 25
कू न्डहित बनकाटी - 46 829 00 03 71
827 00 02 93
837 00 03 51
840 00 01 93
844 00 02 85
850 00 01 74
3134 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
853 00 00 52
855 00 00 20
कू न्डहित बाघासोला - 47 191 00 05 49
294 00 00 20
293 00 01 73
292 00 00 20
291 00 09 52
304 00 02 21
306 00 01 62
308 00 01 08
307 00 00 20
311 00 00 67
340 00 00 75
312 00 00 54
313 00 02 91
316 00 02 35
334 00 00 43
333 00 01 32
1534 00 02 91
1536 00 02 06
1539 00 08 01
1541 00 00 20
1542 00 01 33
1543 00 01 59
1522 00 01 67
1523 00 00 20
1524 00 00 62
1521 00 00 95
1549 00 00 25
1519 00 00 94
1520 00 00 75
1470 00 00 88
1505 00 00 22
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3135
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1512 00 02 37
1506 00 00 77
कू न्डहित बाघासोला - 47 1510 00 00 53
1511 00 01 86
1513 00 00 20
1486 00 02 06
1485 00 01 35
1484 00 00 20
1483 00 01 92
1487 00 02 93
1429 00 04 05
1425 00 00 20
1430 00 02 91
1431 00 01 90
1424 00 00 67
1443 00 03 41
1442 00 00 31
1445 00 04 27
1336 00 00 20
1444 00 03 80
1353 00 01 11
1352 00 01 23
1346 00 03 22
1347 00 01 12
1349 00 00 20
1348 00 00 54
1343 00 00 24
1344 00 00 20
1345 00 01 51
1337 00 00 68
1338 00 02 31
1341 00 00 85
1339 00 00 58
3136 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1326 00 00 94
1327 00 00 85
कू न्डहित बाघासोला - 47 1292 00 03 74
1291 00 00 20
1331 00 04 52
579 00 00 23
580 00 02 19
581 00 02 32
582 00 00 73
637 00 09 80
705 00 00 47
639 00 00 30
638 00 08 19
702 00 09 05
701 00 07 26
707 00 00 20
700 00 05 87
699 00 00 20
689 00 05 63
688 00 00 20
682 00 13 90
691 00 05 62
690 00 04 04
692 00 00 23
679 00 02 25
680 00 00 60
681 00 01 31
कू न्डहित कू न्डहित - 42 1941 00 06 71
971 00 01 65
972 00 03 82
973 00 01 57
1940 00 00 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3137
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2214 00 10 36
986 00 08 12
कू न्डहित कू न्डहित - 42 989 00 06 34
990 00 04 46
993 00 01 78
999 00 18 53
930 00 00 37
929 00 00 20
759 00 00 89
688 00 04 62
692 00 01 85
701 00 00 20
693 00 01 95
700 00 01 36
699 00 04 40
705 00 02 07
676 00 01 50
677 00 01 40
673 00 01 57
674 00 00 20
672 00 02 01
671 00 00 20
669 00 05 07
670 00 00 40
668 00 03 09
724 00 04 07
667 00 00 20
725 00 01 96
726 00 03 06
727 00 09 32
728 00 07 77
655 00 04 64
654 00 03 14
3138 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
496 00 02 81
547 00 00 20
कू न्डहित कू न्डहित - 42 610 00 03 77
609 00 06 87
608 00 04 96
607 00 00 40
604 00 02 09
587 00 07 32
594 00 02 19
593 00 04 08
592 00 02 10
591 00 00 20
कू न्डहित पाहाड़गोड़ा - 33 461 00 00 20
460 00 03 08
464 00 03 18
466 00 02 15
457 00 00 20
454 00 02 46
449 00 00 59
443 00 00 78
442 00 00 96
441 00 00 20
435 00 01 45
433 00 00 94
430 00 01 96
431 00 00 20
347 00 01 99
353 00 00 61
354 00 02 86
425 00 00 20
355 00 01 33
358 00 00 89
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3139
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
414 00 01 18
411 00 00 73
कू न्डहित पाहाड़गोड़ा - 33 412 00 01 31
402 00 01 24
401 00 01 93
399 00 00 80
397 00 01 55
395 00 01 88
393 00 01 22
390 00 01 16
389 00 00 87
388 00 03 89
387 00 01 60
385 00 01 60
386 00 02 19
176 00 01 40
208 00 06 80
207 00 16 69
206 00 01 36
205 00 01 00
204 00 00 20
187 00 00 44
190 00 02 80
195 00 01 07
194 00 00 20
196 00 01 55
201 00 02 21
69 00 01 80
68 00 02 00
67 00 01 48
66 00 01 53
65 00 02 29
55 00 01 55
3140 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
62 00 00 20
61 00 00 34
कू न्डहित पाहाड़गोड़ा - 33 60 00 00 66
59 00 01 19
53 00 01 85
54 00 02 48
4 00 13 93
7 00 00 36
कू न्डहित धनुकड़ी - 13 1187 00 02 80
1197 00 00 69
1196 00 00 99
1195 00 01 13
1203 00 00 77
1204 00 00 68
1194 00 00 68
1193 00 00 71
1205 00 00 87
1206 00 04 23
1207 00 00 20
1157 00 02 33
1158 00 01 45
1154 00 02 45
1152 00 00 34
1153 00 00 95
1307 00 01 14
1082 00 04 68
1070 00 00 48
1077 00 04 05
1079 00 00 20
1078 00 00 99
1076 00 01 44
1100 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3141
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1026 00 00 88
1022 00 00 38
कू न्डहित धनुकड़ी - 13 1025 00 00 76
1024 00 01 31
1023 00 00 20
945 00 01 25
946 00 00 68
950 00 00 20
949 00 00 85
947 00 00 49
948 00 00 85
912 00 01 49
961 00 00 20
911 00 00 23
910 00 02 96
908 00 01 03
981 00 07 10
876 00 01 13
878 00 14 73
877 00 00 54
319 00 01 55
320 00 00 24
353 00 01 23
352 00 00 23
309 00 31 15
354 00 01 11
358 00 00 20
357 00 01 72
356 00 00 45
361 00 00 35
308 00 01 53
174 00 00 66
175 00 01 36
3142 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
170 00 00 20
177 00 00 23
कू न्डहित धनुकड़ी - 13 178 00 00 21
179 00 00 20
180 00 00 20
168 00 00 20
169 00 00 27
165 00 02 88
164 00 01 74
162 00 00 20
217 00 05 25
214 00 00 20
215 00 02 29
216 00 01 41
218 00 01 86
219 00 00 20
226 00 01 18
229 00 01 06
230 00 01 62
231 00 01 54
227 00 00 20
233 00 00 20
234 00 02 25
239 00 01 27
235 00 00 21
238 00 01 02
244 00 00 88
250 00 00 31
249 00 01 51
248 00 01 63
246 00 04 41
कू न्डहित िसबराम - 14 847 00 03 98
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3143
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
856 00 01 22
859 00 00 91
कू न्डहित िसबराम - 14 855 00 00 20
860 00 01 12
775 00 01 61
784 00 00 61
782 00 06 56
781 00 02 38
778 00 01 41
493 00 02 85
492 00 01 08
495 00 02 76
496 00 04 27
494 00 01 28
560 00 00 79
559 00 02 85
614 00 03 67
596 00 00 64
595 00 02 60
597 00 00 20
594 00 01 76
593 00 00 86
696 00 01 46
697 00 04 86
682 00 00 78
680 00 00 55
1127 00 02 06
679 00 01 14
677 00 03 78
676 00 01 03
675 00 00 33
671 00 03 08
670 00 00 31
3144 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
कू न्डहित सुलगॉ - 11 690 00 05 42
691 00 00 91
कू न्डहित सुलगॉ - 11 713 00 06 09
705 00 00 28
704 00 02 78
732 00 06 50
733 00 00 65
734 00 00 20
731 00 01 73
730 00 03 53
743 00 07 59
744 00 00 20
614 00 43 50
845 00 03 27
799 00 02 48
800 00 05 57
नाला खुिड़आम - 16 1002 00 00 78
938 00 02 43
948 00 21 47
940 00 00 26
941 00 00 33
946 00 03 84
942 00 09 19
846 00 01 82
784 00 00 20
785 00 03 96
787 00 02 80
789 00 01 34
790 00 01 68
794 00 00 38
793 00 03 24
799 00 06 49
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3145
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
814 00 00 20
683 00 07 33
नाला खुिड़आम - 16 717 00 00 22
716 00 00 92
715 00 03 17
714 00 01 00
705 00 05 03
689 00 03 97
690 00 02 46
691 00 01 18
692 00 04 19
693 00 02 97
696 00 00 69
599 00 04 91
577 00 02 18
579 00 01 76
581 00 00 98
580 00 02 64
585 00 08 95
594 00 00 93
589 00 00 20
586 00 01 19
587 00 01 07
557 00 05 41
556 00 00 55
555 00 00 22
559 00 02 38
344 00 03 47
345 00 02 39
334 00 01 41
338 00 00 93
337 00 00 20
336 00 01 34
3146 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
326 00 02 78
327 00 00 22
नाला खुिड़आम - 16 325 00 01 25
324 00 01 04
169 00 06 12
153 00 07 13
154 00 07 56
168 00 00 20
नाला सालदिह - 27 99 00 07 76
98 00 00 20
97 00 02 62
95 00 01 18
76 00 16 86
78 00 00 35
77 00 08 23
72 00 00 91
74 00 03 12
891 00 03 01
1098 00 05 39
894 00 06 42
895 00 03 79
896 00 00 76
897 00 04 20
899 00 00 22
898 00 00 20
910 00 02 71
911 00 02 62
908 00 02 41
907 00 00 96
1099 00 54 18
1031 00 07 13
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3147
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
773 00 02 13
770 00 09 51
नाला राख - 26 769 00 01 18
776 00 11 70
777 00 06 84
781 00 00 91
782 00 03 19
785 00 04 63
606 00 00 20
605 00 00 64
604 00 01 94
603 00 00 20
768 00 02 59
620 00 03 29
619 00 00 90
618 00 01 87
617 00 00 31
629 00 04 15
628 00 02 98
630 00 00 91
634 00 00 29
633 00 00 56
635 00 01 47
639 00 01 90
636 00 00 20
638 00 01 25
640 00 00 26
642 00 03 05
643 00 02 59
650 00 00 98
652 00 00 20
655 00 02 23
656 00 02 79
3148 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
473 00 00 42
472 00 00 20
नाला राख - 26 474 00 00 99
475 00 00 20
476 00 02 04
491 00 00 27
477 00 00 85
489 00 00 21
478 00 00 91
479 00 00 92
480 00 00 20
486 00 01 48
485 00 00 71
483 00 01 39
484 00 01 08
461 00 01 34
447 00 00 66
448 00 02 13
460 00 00 37
451 00 05 55
404 00 00 97
2 00 07 56
1 00 00 79
नाला देउिल - 19 2232 00 00 20
2218 00 03 06
2221 00 01 83
2222 00 02 59
2250 00 06 68
2252 00 00 20
2247 00 00 35
2249 00 01 55
2248 00 02 24
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3149
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2255 00 00 92
2257 00 00 75
नाला देउिल - 19 2256 00 03 78
2208 00 12 10
2204 00 00 20
2142 00 02 19
2156 00 12 05
2153 00 04 26
2154 00 00 51
2152 00 00 96
2149 00 02 71
2329 00 01 51
2129 00 00 69
1874 00 05 11
1873 00 00 27
1872 00 04 04
1871 00 01 76
1870 00 01 17
1868 00 00 28
1827 00 04 29
1824 00 01 41
1829 00 02 06
1828 00 00 51
1831 00 09 21
1814 00 02 41
1812 00 01 14
1811 00 01 25
1810 00 02 00
1809 00 00 95
1806 00 03 33
1805 00 01 81
1882 00 02 33
1783 00 00 20
3150 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1905 00 01 17
1904 00 01 24
नाला देउिल - 19 1903 00 03 84
2025 00 00 20
1945 00 01 97
595 00 02 21
591 00 02 27
574 00 01 12
572 00 00 86
556 00 00 78
553 00 01 41
554 00 00 32
557 00 00 57
558 00 00 20
555 00 03 84
450 00 00 93
456 00 00 20
455 00 00 58
454 00 00 20
453 00 00 82
461 00 00 20
451 00 00 23
452 00 00 73
464 00 02 33
467 00 00 20
466 00 01 75
465 00 00 98
484 00 02 50
483 00 00 37
488 00 00 63
489 00 05 44
490 00 01 17
523 00 02 08
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3151
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
513 00 03 20
515 00 02 76
नाला देउिल - 19 517 00 02 82
510 00 00 51
507 00 00 61
508 00 01 95
509 00 02 56
268 00 03 92
269 00 01 71
271 00 00 20
270 00 02 14
272 00 02 43
273 00 01 10
274 00 01 75
217 00 00 20
275 00 02 94
216 00 00 56
276 00 04 27
285 00 00 53
284 00 00 56
283 00 02 70
282 00 07 58
1 00 41 37
915 00 00 58
918 00 01 33
917 00 03 33
951 00 00 20
942 00 01 26
943 00 04 73
944 00 01 28
948 00 02 94
949 00 01 94
2995 00 01 31
3152 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
नाला डुमरिय़ा - 10 1008 00 00 84
नाला डुमरिय़ा - 10 100 00 03 10
101 00 04 57
102 00 00 20
105 00 06 49
103 00 00 28
104 00 03 49
86 00 00 20
87 00 03 55
88 00 01 42
77 00 02 97
76 00 00 20
89 00 13 38
7 00 00 72
2 00 16 57
नाला कािलपाथर - 4 521 00 07 96
520 00 36 67
279 00 00 20
278 00 05 41
277 00 02 50
600 00 05 08
599 00 05 32
263 00 01 31
262 00 00 46
261 00 03 62
259 00 01 78
260 00 00 97
257 00 01 58
222 00 05 94
255 00 02 09
223 00 00 93
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3153
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
नाला सहरपुर - 3 387 00 05 97
411 00 00 77
नाला सहरपुर - 3 386 00 00 20
391 00 05 91
384 00 08 45
392 00 00 22
393 00 00 99
320 00 18 12
235 00 00 22
233 00 01 05
230 00 04 85
232 00 00 20
231 00 03 49
226 00 01 66
225 00 02 07
नाला जरकू ँ िड़ - 7 496 00 01 38
497 00 02 94
490 00 03 05
488 00 03 25
487 00 01 96
485 00 01 22
486 00 01 02
500 00 01 07
450 00 01 96
451 00 00 20
454 00 01 43
452 00 02 25
453 00 00 56
455 00 06 03
458 00 00 20
460 00 00 29
461 00 00 73
3154 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
465 00 10 28
75 00 01 05
नाला जरकू ँ िड़ - 7 76 00 01 52
70 00 01 07
69 00 01 58
83 00 01 77
82 00 00 61
84 00 01 29
68 00 00 20
67 00 04 18
62 00 01 33
63 00 00 62
142 00 00 20
130 00 03 03
131 00 03 16
132 00 00 51
133 00 00 73
135 00 01 91
141 00 01 21
140 00 00 23
162 00 02 88
613 00 02 52
161 00 01 24
163 00 00 20
160 00 01 13
127 00 02 30
173 00 01 00
174 00 01 50
175 00 06 21
177 00 04 50
188 00 06 26
नाला सुन्दरपुर - 6 255 00 03 54
336 00 16 25[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3155
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
311 00 00 33
264 00 12 16
नाला सुन्दरपुर - 6 347 00 01 86
349 00 01 09
279 00 00 31
351 00 02 37
274 00 04 55
273 00 01 53
343 00 01 01
275 00 01 42
272 00 02 20
नाला मनीहारी - 5 870 00 00 36
869 00 04 29
868 00 05 34
879 00 01 04
880 00 00 20
881 00 01 50
885 00 07 44
883 00 01 00
882 00 04 69
855 00 01 09
853 00 00 73
968 00 00 62
852 00 01 34
851 00 05 66
846 00 05 61
752 00 15 15
750 00 01 87
748 00 00 32
749 00 02 75
744 00 07 75
743 00 04 08
3156 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
728 00 03 27
727 00 00 20
नाला मनीहारी - 5 716 00 00 28
714 00 00 55
715 00 00 88
711 00 02 07
706 00 03 13
705 00 01 84
[फा....सं. आर-11025(11)/21/2018-ओआर I/ईईईई-27764]
शान्तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 784.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of the India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S. O. No. 2846 Dated 31st October, 2017 published on 23rd December 2017 and vide S.O. No. 1763 dated 7th December 2018 published on 15th December, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems Project" for the transportation of Crude Oil in Jamtara District in the State of Jharkhand by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 5th November 2018.
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the Central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P&MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
| District : JAMTARA State : JHARKHAND | |||||
| Tehsil | Village | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
KUNDAHIT SUDRAKSHIPUR - 13 4829 00 00 23
4828 00 04 29
4835 00 04 10
KUNDAHIT SUDRAKSHIPUR - 13 4844 00 04 58
4953 00 00 20
94
4952 00 02
4949 00 23 68
4864 00 02 27
4865 00 02 86
4866 00 00 20
4867 00 03 11
4885 00 00 61
4886 00 05 33
4887 00 00 63
4894 00 03 92
4905 00 04 38
4906 00 04 30
4918 00 02 38
4907 00 04 29
4909 00 00 69
4910 00 01 19
4912 00 00 71
4813 00 08 71
4801 00 00 93
4576 00 00 20
4574 00 02 71
4573 00 02 41
4568 00 01 23
4569 00 02 99
4571 00 01 92
4570 00 05 10
4548 00 00 20
4543 00 00 20
4545 00 04 45
4542 00 00 39
4546 00 00 20
3158 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4536 00 01 48
4535 00 08 49
3900 00 00 77
KUNDAHIT SUDRAKSHIPUR - 13 4525 00 01 25
4524 00 00 27
3950 00 03 86
3948 00 00 48
3947 00 00 20
3949 00 04 83
3951 00 00 20
3935 00 05 28
3934 00 02 13
3931 00 04 04
3930 00 00 20
3928 00 01 09
3960 00 04 10
3962 00 00 20
3963 00 01 81
3968 00 00 45
3967 00 05 40
3976 00 03 01
3975 00 01 51
3977 00 03 04
3974 00 04 04
3997 00 00 44
3998 00 01 50
4500 00 02 22
4499 00 03 07
4496 00 10 70
4486 00 05 32
4485 00 08 26
4484 00 04 54
2670 00 02 89
2669 00 00 38
2668 00 02 21
2162 00 00 82
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3159
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2153 00 04 60
2150 00 08 90
2154 00 00 20
KUNDAHIT SUDRAKSHIPUR - 13 2158 00 04 44
5432 00 01 53
2137 00 00 20
2144 00 11 51
2138 00 01 72
2139 00 00 42
2118 00 00 42
2116 00 00 60
2117 00 06 28
2087 00 00 26
2040 00 04 25
2039 00 12 87
2037 00 01 02
2033 00 01 26
2043 00 01 44
2028 00 07 09
2027 00 01 33
2032 00 04 46
2021 00 02 65
2020 00 04 12
2026 00 12 03
2019 00 02 78
5381 00 01 75
2017 00 01 88
2018 00 04 43
5380 00 01 80
2016 00 05 64
2288 00 05 86
491 00 02 38
2012 00 00 20
2289 00 03 61
2290 00 04 67
2291 00 01 36
3160 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2297 00 08 47
2298 00 01 46
2304 00 04 00
KUNDAHIT SUDRAKSHIPUR - 13 2303 00 01 21
2307 00 00 40
2305 00 04 50
2306 00 02 44
296 00 03 67
295 00 06 51
300 00 00 20
301 00 02 40
305 00 08 09
303 00 02 44
304 00 03 72
315 00 01 54
314 00 02 24
316 00 01 21
317 00 03 62
318 00 00 20
320 00 06 45
353 00 00 78
356 00 05 25
355 00 11 71
357 00 00 53
365 00 06 37
367 00 03 78
368 00 00 20
369 00 02 25
370 00 01 32
371 00 05 90
387 00 01 40
386 00 00 53
385 00 03 97
377 00 04 33
378 00 01 03
KUNDAHIT JOKPAHARI - 38 1388 00 01 77
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3161
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1386 00 04 52
1385 00 01 95
1383 00 02 83
KUNDAHIT JOKPAHARI - 38 1377 00 05 55
1372 00 06 78
1371 00 01 90
1370 00 01 04
1375 00 02 14
1374 00 04 73
KUNDAHIT SINGARPUR - 37 545 00 03 29
544 00 01 97
515 00 03 78
514 00 04 12
513 00 00 96
512 00 00 46
516 00 00 20
510 00 00 60
511 00 01 53
517 00 03 07
518 00 00 62
519 00 00 52
492 00 00 20
493 00 00 88
497 00 00 82
498 00 00 93
496 00 00 60
495 00 00 20
499 00 01 08
500 00 01 54
489 00 00 20
483 00 01 67
488 00 01 06
487 00 01 48
486 00 00 76
485 00 00 20
3162 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
469 00 07 25
471 00 00 20
470 00 03 76
KUNDAHIT PANCH MAHULI - 36 624 00 03 58
604 00 02 30
606 00 00 35
603 00 01 32
605 00 00 20
602 00 00 29
601 00 02 56
600 00 01 61
599 00 02 66
589 00 02 55
597 00 01 95
598 00 00 53
596 00 02 43
595 00 00 20
594 00 00 80
591 00 04 97
592 00 00 66
584 00 01 18
581 00 04 75
579 00 00 20
582 00 01 94
345 00 02 06
344 00 01 96
340 00 00 91
339 00 00 37
335 00 11 51
369 00 00 88
370 00 00 37
371 00 02 62
332 00 01 39
308 00 04 10
306 00 01 37
309 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3163
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
299 00 01 51
301 00 02 04
302 00 01 56
KUNDAHIT PANCH MAHULI - 36 300 00 00 20
207 00 00 20
206 00 04 37
174 00 00 25
205 00 00 20
212 00 00 67
202 00 09 87
194 00 01 19
192 00 01 34
195 00 01 74
183 00 01 63
184 00 02 36
185 00 00 20
628 00 00 20
KUNDAHIT KHAJURI - 17 3337 00 04 13
3338 00 02 24
3347 00 00 69
3348 00 02 42
3349 00 01 27
3312 00 03 92
3376 00 01 52
3367 00 02 93
3375 00 03 51
3383 00 06 57
3382 00 00 67
3390 00 04 32
3386 00 04 52
3389 00 03 23
3393 00 01 03
3394 00 00 20
3144 00 00 90
3142 00 06 67
3164 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3149 00 16 55
3096 00 02 85
3098 00 00 20
KUNDAHIT KHAJURI - 17 3097 00 00 73
3095 00 01 08
3094 00 00 94
3087 00 02 44
3088 00 07 21
3080 00 00 20
3082 00 00 87
3081 00 01 26
3039 00 00 20
3038 00 02 13
3036 00 00 90
3035 00 00 87
3033 00 01 19
3043 00 01 53
3044 00 01 02
3045 00 01 21
3046 00 00 42
3047 00 00 20
3056 00 00 20
3023 00 00 20
3030 00 00 20
3024 00 05 55
3022 00 00 77
3021 00 00 98
2985 00 03 60
2986 00 00 20
2997 00 00 82
2998 00 00 27
2994 00 00 31
2996 00 04 65
3006 00 02 38
2979 00 01 98
1463 00 07 17
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3165
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1477 00 00 95
1476 00 00 83
1475 00 00 80
KUNDAHIT KHAJURI - 17 1484 00 00 99
1474 00 00 20
1545 00 03 13
1548 00 00 51
1546 00 01 06
1585 00 00 87
1584 00 00 41
1540 00 00 14
1586 00 01 34
1587 00 00 20
1588 00 00 75
1611 00 02 97
1589 00 00 62
1610 00 00 22
1609 00 00 20
1620 00 00 28
1612 00 01 26
1613 00 01 49
1605 00 00 20
1614 00 00 49
1604 00 00 85
1603 00 00 50
1602 00 00 99
1600 00 00 97
1697 00 01 46
1599 00 01 42
1699 00 00 58
1748 00 00 69
1703 00 01 45
1704 00 00 20
1726 00 00 96
1728 00 02 62
1731 00 02 49
3166 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1737 00 00 20
1739 00 00 23
1741 00 01 15
KUNDAHIT KHAJURI - 17 4326 00 00 85
1178 00 01 68
1177 00 00 90
1176 00 01 40
1175 00 00 30
1160 00 06 24
1156 00 00 20
1161 00 02 34
4417 00 00 20
1154 00 00 85
1153 00 03 77
1152 00 04 17
1146 00 08 36
1149 00 06 10
1150 00 00 25
1089 00 02 61
1091 00 04 68
1090 00 03 61
1094 00 04 02
946 00 00 20
949 00 11 85
948 00 04 98
942 00 04 63
940 00 12 21
912 00 02 48
936 00 01 56
935 00 00 74
930 00 03 80
934 00 00 81
927 00 00 27
928 00 01 65
926 00 00 91
891 00 04 40
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3167
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
890 00 01 43
889 00 02 27
887 00 00 81
KUNDAHIT KHAJURI - 17 886 00 00 20
888 00 03 85
881 00 00 20
879 00 00 77
878 00 02 96
880 00 04 43
808 00 03 75
809 00 00 22
807 00 06 26
783 00 00 20
784 00 00 87
785 00 00 98
801 00 00 20
786 00 01 11
799 00 00 98
796 00 01 88
798 00 03 03
610 00 00 25
441 00 03 50
612 00 00 20
611 00 01 83
443 00 00 56
445 00 00 96
444 00 00 83
448 00 00 24
449 00 02 61
451 00 03 32
453 00 01 05
454 00 01 93
456 00 00 63
457 00 02 33
KUNDAHIT SIMA - 15 802 00 05 20
3168 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
KUNDAHIT KHAIRBANI - 18 572 00 10 54
570 00 01 45
452 00 00 59
KUNDAHIT KHAIRBANI - 18 80 00 21 21
390 00 02 48
343 00 00 99
342 00 00 71
331 00 01 37
121 00 05 37
674 00 56 31
181 00 01 52
188 00 01 71
189 00 03 06
212 00 00 20
213 00 00 71
201 00 08 60
665 00 01 59
KUNDAHIT PRASADPUR - 19 1321 00 02 46
1187 00 01 60
1190 00 01 03
1186 00 00 20
1191 00 09 75
1240 00 03 60
1241 00 01 28
1239 00 02 68
1237 00 01 65
1238 00 00 28
1236 00 02 01
1235 00 00 94
1234 00 00 35
1227 00 00 23
1228 00 01 23
1220 00 02 77
1229 00 00 50
1217 00 01 52
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3169
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1216 00 00 20
1215 00 00 20
981 00 00 78
KUNDAHIT PRASADPUR - 19 472 00 01 23
529 00 00 64
473 00 00 40
530 00 00 24
539 00 02 53
528 00 06 98
522 00 00 20
521 00 01 41
520 00 00 55
519 00 01 91
513 00 01 06
515 00 00 20
514 00 01 67
505 00 01 37
508 00 01 44
507 00 00 71
506 00 04 09
678 00 03 03
677 00 01 07
679 00 00 20
675 00 05 08
812 00 14 71
810 00 00 20
716 00 04 93
805 00 06 12
809 00 03 48
808 00 00 90
806 00 00 21
807 00 02 72
8 00 00 83
9 00 00 50
120 00 02 45
121 00 00 42
3170 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
117 00 00 20
118 00 02 88
10 00 04 41
KUNDAHIT PRASADPUR - 19 11 00 03 75
5 00 15 52
31 00 00 68
32 00 01 98
34 00 00 20
95 00 05 49
80 00 01 27
41 00 04 88
1 00 00 47
KUNDAHIT GARJURI - 10 2461 00 00 70
2466 00 01 49
2465 00 01 13
2464 00 08 94
2477 00 00 20
2463 00 00 20
2462 00 02 57
2402 00 10 35
2438 00 02 78
2430 00 01 32
2431 00 00 79
2429 00 00 40
2428 00 01 80
2427 00 00 20
2425 00 00 20
2424 00 00 59
KUNDAHIT PALAJURI - 12 1652 00 03 12
1651 00 01 90
1644 00 12 03
1643 00 00 92
1636 00 05 31
1634 00 00 25
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3171
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1631 00 04 82
1632 00 00 37
1617 00 05 30
KUNDAHIT PALAJURI - 12 1618 00 02 08
1616 00 04 29
1613 00 00 20
1612 00 01 99
1611 00 00 20
1621 00 00 55
1610 00 05 37
1526 00 11 43
1524 00 03 53
1521 00 13 39
1522 00 02 12
1517 00 00 57
1516 00 02 83
1513 00 01 31
1512 00 01 51
1511 00 01 35
1509 00 01 96
1508 00 03 14
1496 00 03 10
1494 00 02 07
1493 00 01 80
1491 00 05 94
1485 00 01 34
1488 00 01 16
1487 00 03 19
1486 00 01 59
97 00 05 74
98 00 03 00
100 00 00 20
101 00 04 26
102 00 01 45
118 00 07 59
112 00 01 14
3172 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
122 00 00 11
123 00 04 07
162 00 03 25
KUNDAHIT PALAJURI - 12 161 00 05 11
160 00 02 07
164 00 01 84
169 00 06 38
156 00 00 48
168 00 00 86
165 00 01 55
172 00 03 73
173 00 01 72
177 00 02 61
194 00 00 20
193 00 01 73
195 00 01 19
196 00 01 13
197 00 00 20
201 00 07 68
205 00 02 74
203 00 00 57
KUNDAHIT JITURHIR - 48 204 00 02 12
203 00 00 49
206 00 02 34
207 00 00 73
199 00 05 67
136 00 00 33
138 00 04 51
145 00 15 23
7 00 02 55
6 00 06 08
4 00 01 40
5 00 01 07
1 00 09 65
2 00 01 33
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3173
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
KUNDAHIT BANKATI - 46 829 00 03 71
827 00 02 93
837 00 03 51
KUNDAHIT BANKATI - 46 840 00 01 93
844 00 02 85
850 00 01 74
854 00 01 03
851 00 00 43
852 00 01 12
853 00 00 52
855 00 00 20
KUNDAHIT BAGHASOL - 47 191 00 05 49
294 00 00 20
293 00 01 73
292 00 00 20
291 00 09 52
304 00 02 21
306 00 01 62
308 00 01 08
307 00 00 20
311 00 00 67
340 00 00 75
312 00 00 54
313 00 02 91
316 00 02 35
334 00 00 43
333 00 01 32
1534 00 02 91
1536 00 02 06
1539 00 08 01
1541 00 00 20
1542 00 01 33
1543 00 01 59
1522 00 01 67
1523 00 00 20
3174 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1519 00 00 94
1520 00 00 75
1470 00 00 88
KUNDAHIT BAGHASOL - 47 1505 00 00 22
1518 00 00 64
1517 00 00 60
1516 00 00 35
1512 00 02 37
1506 00 00 77
1510 00 00 53
1511 00 01 86
1513 00 00 20
1486 00 02 06
1485 00 01 35
1484 00 00 20
1483 00 01 92
1487 00 02 93
1429 00 04 05
1425 00 00 20
1430 00 02 91
1431 00 01 90
1424 00 00 67
1443 00 03 41
1442 00 00 31
1445 00 04 27
1336 00 00 20
1444 00 03 80
1353 00 01 11
1352 00 01 23
1346 00 03 22
1347 00 01 12
1349 00 00 20
1348 00 00 54
1343 00 00 24
1344 00 00 20
1345 00 01 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3175
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1341 00 00 85
1339 00 00 58
1329 00 02 74
KUNDAHIT BAGHASOL - 47 1324 00 00 20
1325 00 00 63
1326 00 00 94
1327 00 00 85
1292 00 03 74
1291 00 00 20
1331 00 04 52
579 00 00 23
580 00 02 19
581 00 02 32
582 00 00 73
637 00 09 80
705 00 00 47
639 00 00 30
638 00 08 19
702 00 09 05
701 00 07 26
707 00 00 20
700 00 05 87
699 00 00 20
689 00 05 63
688 00 00 20
682 00 13 90
691 00 05 62
690 00 04 04
692 00 00 23
679 00 02 25
680 00 00 60
681 00 01 31
KUNDAHIT KUNDAHIT - 42 1941 00 06 71
971 00 01 65
972 00 03 82
3176 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
985 00 21 72
984 00 02 24
2214 00 10 36
KUNDAHIT KUNDAHIT - 42 986 00 08 12
989 00 06 34
990 00 04 46
993 00 01 78
999 00 18 53
930 00 00 37
929 00 00 20
759 00 00 89
688 00 04 62
692 00 01 85
701 00 00 20
693 00 01 95
700 00 01 36
699 00 04 40
705 00 02 07
676 00 01 50
677 00 01 40
673 00 01 57
674 00 00 20
672 00 02 01
671 00 00 20
669 00 05 07
670 00 00 40
668 00 03 09
724 00 04 07
667 00 00 20
725 00 01 96
726 00 03 06
727 00 09 32
728 00 07 77
655 00 04 64
654 00 03 14
653 00 12 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3177
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
496 00 02 81
547 00 00 20
610 00 03 77
KUNDAHIT KUNDAHIT - 42 609 00 06 87
608 00 04 96
607 00 00 40
604 00 02 09
587 00 07 32
594 00 02 19
593 00 04 08
592 00 02 10
591 00 00 20
KUNDAHIT PAHARGORA - 33 461 00 00 20
460 00 03 08
464 00 03 18
466 00 02 15
457 00 00 20
454 00 02 46
449 00 00 59
443 00 00 78
442 00 00 96
441 00 00 20
435 00 01 45
433 00 00 94
430 00 01 96
431 00 00 20
347 00 01 99
353 00 00 61
354 00 02 86
425 00 00 20
355 00 01 33
358 00 00 89
360 00 01 99
420 00 01 79
417 00 00 42
3178 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
402 00 01 24
401 00 01 93
399 00 00 80
KUNDAHIT PAHARGORA - 33 397 00 01 55
395 00 01 88
393 00 01 22
390 00 01 16
389 00 00 87
388 00 03 89
387 00 01 60
385 00 01 60
386 00 02 19
176 00 01 40
208 00 06 80
207 00 16 69
206 00 01 36
205 00 01 00
204 00 00 20
187 00 00 44
190 00 02 80
195 00 01 07
194 00 00 20
196 00 01 55
201 00 02 21
69 00 01 80
68 00 02 00
67 00 01 48
66 00 01 53
65 00 02 29
55 00 01 55
56 00 00 20
57 00 00 65
58 00 05 48
62 00 00 20
61 00 00 34
60 00 00 66
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3179
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
54 00 02 48
4 00 13 93
7 00 00 36
KUNDAHIT DHANUKDI - 13 1187 00 02 80
1197 00 00 69
1196 00 00 99
1195 00 01 13
1203 00 00 77
1204 00 00 68
1194 00 00 68
1193 00 00 71
1205 00 00 87
1206 00 04 23
1207 00 00 20
1157 00 02 33
1158 00 01 45
1154 00 02 45
1152 00 00 34
1153 00 00 95
1307 00 01 14
1082 00 04 68
1070 00 00 48
1077 00 04 05
1079 00 00 20
1078 00 00 99
1076 00 01 44
1100 00 00 20
1075 00 00 98
1101 00 01 46
1036 00 02 18
1026 00 00 88
1022 00 00 38
1025 00 00 76
1024 00 01 31
1023 00 00 20
945 00 01 25
3180 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
947 00 00 49
948 00 00 85
912 00 01 49
KUNDAHIT DHANUKDI - 13 961 00 00 20
911 00 00 23
910 00 02 96
908 00 01 03
981 00 07 10
876 00 01 13
878 00 14 73
877 00 00 54
319 00 01 55
320 00 00 24
353 00 01 23
352 00 00 23
309 00 31 15
354 00 01 11
358 00 00 20
357 00 01 72
356 00 00 45
361 00 00 35
308 00 01 53
174 00 00 66
175 00 01 36
173 00 01 45
172 00 00 62
171 00 00 56
170 00 00 20
177 00 00 23
178 00 00 21
179 00 00 20
180 00 00 20
168 00 00 20
169 00 00 27
165 00 02 88
164 00 01 74
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3181
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
214 00 00 20
215 00 02 29
216 00 01 41
KUNDAHIT DHANUKDI - 13 218 00 01 86
219 00 00 20
226 00 01 18
229 00 01 06
230 00 01 62
231 00 01 54
227 00 00 20
233 00 00 20
234 00 02 25
239 00 01 27
235 00 00 21
238 00 01 02
244 00 00 88
250 00 00 31
249 00 01 51
248 00 01 63
246 00 04 41
KUNDAHIT SIBRAM - 14 847 00 03 98
862 00 00 50
857 00 02 68
858 00 03 01
856 00 01 22
859 00 00 91
855 00 00 20
860 00 01 12
775 00 01 61
784 00 00 61
782 00 06 56
781 00 02 38
778 00 01 41
493 00 02 85
492 00 01 08
3182 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
560 00 00 79
559 00 02 85
614 00 03 67
KUNDAHIT SIBRAM - 14 596 00 00 64
595 00 02 60
597 00 00 20
594 00 01 76
593 00 00 86
696 00 01 46
697 00 04 86
682 00 00 78
680 00 00 55
1127 00 02 06
679 00 01 14
677 00 03 78
676 00 01 03
675 00 00 33
671 00 03 08
670 00 00 31
1128 00 00 47
1131 00 00 66
KUNDAHIT SULANGA - 11 690 00 05 42
691 00 00 91
713 00 06 09
705 00 00 28
704 00 02 78
732 00 06 50
733 00 00 65
734 00 00 20
731 00 01 73
730 00 03 53
743 00 07 59
744 00 00 20
614 00 43 50
845 00 03 27
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3183
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
NALA KHURIAM - 16 1002 00 00 78
938 00 02 43
NALA KHURIAM - 16 948 00 21 47
940 00 00 26
941 00 00 33
946 00 03 84
942 00 09 19
846 00 01 82
784 00 00 20
785 00 03 96
787 00 02 80
789 00 01 34
790 00 01 68
794 00 00 38
793 00 03 24
799 00 06 49
800 00 02 10
801 00 01 70
802 00 03 20
814 00 00 20
683 00 07 33
717 00 00 22
716 00 00 92
715 00 03 17
714 00 01 00
705 00 05 03
689 00 03 97
690 00 02 46
691 00 01 18
692 00 04 19
693 00 02 97
696 00 00 69
599 00 04 91
577 00 02 18
579 00 01 76
3184 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
594 00 00 93
589 00 00 20
586 00 01 19
NALA KHURIAM - 16 587 00 01 07
557 00 05 41
556 00 00 55
555 00 00 22
559 00 02 38
344 00 03 47
345 00 02 39
334 00 01 41
338 00 00 93
337 00 00 20
336 00 01 34
335 00 02 06
328 00 02 42
329 00 00 50
326 00 02 78
327 00 00 22
325 00 01 25
324 00 01 04
169 00 06 12
153 00 07 13
154 00 07 56
168 00 00 20
NALA SALDAHI - 27 99 00 07 76
98 00 00 20
97 00 02 62
95 00 01 18
76 00 16 86
78 00 00 35
77 00 08 23
72 00 00 91
74 00 03 12
NALA BAMUNDI - 17 891 00 03 01
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3185
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
894 00 06 42
895 00 03 79
896 00 00 76
NALA BAMUNDI - 17 897 00 04 20
899 00 00 22
898 00 00 20
910 00 02 71
911 00 02 62
908 00 02 41
907 00 00 96
1099 00 54 18
1031 00 07 13
1030 00 06 23
NALA RAKH - 26 774 00 04 07
773 00 02 13
770 00 09 51
769 00 01 18
776 00 11 70
777 00 06 84
781 00 00 91
782 00 03 19
785 00 04 63
606 00 00 20
605 00 00 64
604 00 01 94
603 00 00 20
768 00 02 59
620 00 03 29
619 00 00 90
618 00 01 87
617 00 00 31
629 00 04 15
628 00 02 98
630 00 00 91
634 00 00 29
3186 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
636 00 00 20
638 00 01 25
640 00 00 26
NALA RAKH - 26 642 00 03 05
643 00 02 59
650 00 00 98
652 00 00 20
655 00 02 23
656 00 02 79
658 00 01 51
661 00 00 29
659 00 03 18
473 00 00 42
472 00 00 20
474 00 00 99
475 00 00 20
476 00 02 04
491 00 00 27
477 00 00 85
489 00 00 21
478 00 00 91
479 00 00 92
480 00 00 20
486 00 01 48
485 00 00 71
483 00 01 39
484 00 01 08
461 00 01 34
447 00 00 66
448 00 02 13
460 00 00 37
451 00 05 55
404 00 00 97
2 00 07 56
1 00 00 79
NALA DEOLI - 19 2232 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3187
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2221 00 01 83
2222 00 02 59
2250 00 06 68
NALA DEOLI - 19 2252 00 00 20
2247 00 00 35
2249 00 01 55
2248 00 02 24
2245 00 04 05
2253 00 01 88
2254 00 02 01
2255 00 00 92
2257 00 00 75
2256 00 03 78
2208 00 12 10
2204 00 00 20
2142 00 02 19
2156 00 12 05
2153 00 04 26
2154 00 00 51
2152 00 00 96
2149 00 02 71
2329 00 01 51
2129 00 00 69
1874 00 05 11
1873 00 00 27
1872 00 04 04
1871 00 01 76
1870 00 01 17
1868 00 00 28
1827 00 04 29
1824 00 01 41
1829 00 02 06
1828 00 00 51
1831 00 09 21
1814 00 02 41
1812 00 01 14
3188 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1806 00 03 33
1805 00 01 81
1882 00 02 33
NALA DEOLI - 19 1783 00 00 20
1906 00 01 12
1907 00 05 13
1908 00 00 44
1905 00 01 17
1904 00 01 24
1903 00 03 84
2025 00 00 20
1945 00 01 97
595 00 02 21
591 00 02 27
574 00 01 12
572 00 00 86
556 00 00 78
553 00 01 41
554 00 00 32
557 00 00 57
558 00 00 20
555 00 03 84
450 00 00 93
456 00 00 20
455 00 00 58
454 00 00 20
453 00 00 82
461 00 00 20
451 00 00 23
452 00 00 73
464 00 02 33
467 00 00 20
466 00 01 75
465 00 00 98
484 00 02 50
483 00 00 37
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3189
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
490 00 01 17
523 00 02 08
524 00 00 20
NALA DEOLI - 19 522 00 01 93
521 00 00 97
513 00 03 20
515 00 02 76
517 00 02 82
510 00 00 51
507 00 00 61
508 00 01 95
509 00 02 56
268 00 03 92
269 00 01 71
271 00 00 20
270 00 02 14
272 00 02 43
273 00 01 10
274 00 01 75
217 00 00 20
275 00 02 94
216 00 00 56
276 00 04 27
285 00 00 53
284 00 00 56
283 00 02 70
282 00 07 58
1 00 41 37
915 00 00 58
918 00 01 33
917 00 03 33
951 00 00 20
942 00 01 26
943 00 04 73
944 00 01 28
948 00 02 94
3190 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
995 00 00 96
997 00 04 05
NALA DUMARIA - 10 1008 00 00 84
100 00 03 10
101 00 04 57
102 00 00 20
105 00 06 49
103 00 00 28
104 00 03 49
86 00 00 20
87 00 03 55
88 00 01 42
77 00 02 97
76 00 00 20
89 00 13 38
7 00 00 72
2 00 16 57
NALA KALIPATHAR - 4 521 00 07 96
520 00 36 67
279 00 00 20
278 00 05 41
277 00 02 50
600 00 05 08
599 00 05 32
263 00 01 31
262 00 00 46
261 00 03 62
259 00 01 78
260 00 00 97
257 00 01 58
222 00 05 94
255 00 02 09
223 00 00 93
221 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3191
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
NALA SAHARPUR - 3 387 00 05 97
411 00 00 77
386 00 00 20
NALA SAHARPUR - 3 391 00 05 91
384 00 08 45
392 00 00 22
393 00 00 99
320 00 18 12
235 00 00 22
233 00 01 05
230 00 04 85
232 00 00 20
231 00 03 49
226 00 01 66
225 00 02 07
NALA JARKURI - 7 496 00 01 38
497 00 02 94
490 00 03 05
488 00 03 25
487 00 01 96
485 00 01 22
486 00 01 02
500 00 01 07
450 00 01 96
451 00 00 20
454 00 01 43
452 00 02 25
453 00 00 56
455 00 06 03
458 00 00 20
460 00 00 29
461 00 00 73
462 00 00 65
3192 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
465 00 10 28
75 00 01 05
76 00 01 52
NALA JARKURI - 7 70 00 01 07
69 00 01 58
83 00 01 77
82 00 00 61
84 00 01 29
68 00 00 20
67 00 04 18
62 00 01 33
63 00 00 62
142 00 00 20
130 00 03 03
131 00 03 16
132 00 00 51
133 00 00 73
135 00 01 91
141 00 01 21
140 00 00 23
162 00 02 88
613 00 02 52
161 00 01 24
163 00 00 20
160 00 01 13
127 00 02 30
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941
3193
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
174 00 01 50
175 00 06 21
NALA JARKURI - 7 177 00 04 50
188 00 06 26
NALA SUNDARPUR - 6 255 00 03 54
335 00 00 20
336 00 16 25
232 00 00 20
311 00 00 33
264 00 12 16
347 00 01 86
349 00 01 09
279 00 00 31
351 00 02 37
274 00 04 55
273 00 01 53
343 00 01 01
275 00 01 42
272 00 02 20
NALA MANIHARI - 5 870 00 00 36
869 00 04 29
868 00 05 34
879 00 01 04
880 00 00 20
881 00 01 50
3194 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
882 00 04 69
855 00 01 09
NALA MANIHARI - 5 853 00 00 73
968 00 00 62
852 00 01 34
851 00 05 66
846 00 05 61
752 00 15 15
750 00 01 87
748 00 00 32
749 00 02 75
744 00 07 75
743 00 04 08
740 00 03 18
729 00 02 00
726 00 00 24
728 00 03 27
727 00 00 20
716 00 00 28
714 00 00 55
715 00 00 88
711 00 02 07
706 00 03 13
705 00 01 84
[F. No. R-11025(11)/21/2018-OR-I/E-27764]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3195नई दिल्ली,,,, 8 मई,,,, 2019
काकाकाका.आआआआ. 785785785785....————के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात् उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 187, दिनांक 30 जनवरी 2018, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 03 फरवरी 2018, में प्रकाशित की गई थी,,,, तथा अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1760, दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर 2018,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 15 दिसम्बर 2018 को प्रकाशित की गई थी । इन अधिसूचना से संल? अनुसूची में विनीBदष्ट भूमि में पDिम बंगाल राज्य में "हल्दिया----बरौनी पाइपलाइन सिस्टम्स परियोजना" िजला बीरभूम में कJे तेल के परिवहन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के िलए उपयोग के अिधकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी |
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियां जनता को दिनांक 2 जुलाई 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,,,,
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है,,,,
और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने,,,, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पDात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है,,,, उसमें उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिDय किया है;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Xए यह घोषणा करती है की इस अधिसूचना से संल? अनुसूची में विनीBदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;;;;
और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Xए,,,, यह निदZश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की दिनांक से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए,,,, सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइंन अिधिनयम,,,,1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपू[त के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उतरदाई होगा और पाइपलाइन से संबन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार के वि\] कोई दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नह^ हो सके गी।
| िजला :बीरभूम ब गाल ं राज्य : प िम राज्य : प िम बंगाल ब ब ं ं | |||||
| थाना | मौज़ा का नाम | सव नम्बर | क्ष े त्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रफलफलफलफल | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर |
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6) बोलपुर उदयपुर - 111 139 00 12 94
105 00 05 49 बोलपुर उदयपुर - 111 107 00 02 76
111 00 07 25
108 00 00 20
110 00 01 33
109 00 02 64 बोलपुर चन्दनपुर - 110 3112 00 05 49 3196 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर चन्दनपुर - 110 3110 00 02 21
2985 00 00 20
3109 00 01 03
2986 00 00 29
3012 00 00 70
3014 00 01 61
3013 00 01 10
3017 00 03 16
3018 00 03 79
3021 00 07 39
3024 00 03 52
3037 00 00 74
3048 00 02 78
3049 00 01 14
3050 00 01 95
3061 00 00 26
3052 00 02 94
3054 00 03 25
3056 00 01 97
3055 00 00 98
2632 00 00 73
2339 00 02 56
2338 00 00 57
2337 00 00 36
2329 00 00 20
2328 00 04 50
2235 00 08 96
2233 00 00 20
2236 00 00 62
2134 00 01 12
2217 00 02 28
2216 00 01 85
2215 00 03 09
2212 00 02 83
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3197
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर चन्दनपुर - 110 2204 00 02 38
2205 00 00 43
2203 00 02 66
2202 00 01 99
2201 00 01 11
1232 00 00 57
1216 00 00 50
1215 00 00 31
1217 00 01 18
1218 00 00 82
1219 00 01 31
1210/3349 00 00 22
1220 00 00 92
1207 00 04 66
1208 00 04 88
1201 00 02 55
1197 00 02 40
1209/3212 00 00 33
3218 00 14 01
1196 00 03 06
1192 00 02 35
1117/3146 00 02 34
1117 00 05 07
1116 00 02 50
1115 00 00 57
1111 00 04 62
1114 00 01 59
1113 00 00 20
1112 00 00 20
3348 00 01 85
3347 00 01 54
3346 00 01 86
3277 00 00 37
875 00 02 10
3198 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर चन्दनपुर - 110 872 00 01 43
871 00 00 77
870 00 01 16
899 00 02 15
854 00 03 83
791 00 03 72
790 00 00 20
788 00 01 56
787 00 04 09
414 00 01 44
768 00 00 21
769 00 00 53
770 00 00 39
771 00 07 86
766 00 02 13
760 00 02 44
759 00 01 31
618 00 00 20
761 00 01 75
762 00 00 44
660 00 05 06
652 00 04 31
626 00 02 22
651 00 02 13
649 00 04 37
650 00 01 44
645 00 06 33
511 00 12 07
532 00 03 98
534 00 03 88
556 00 00 48
543 00 00 99
542 00 02 15
541 00 02 15
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3199
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर चन्दनपुर - 110 540 00 00 21
336 00 02 38
331 00 01 00
334 00 04 56
315 00 08 34
294 00 04 04
297 00 03 15
296 00 00 20
300/3236 00 00 20
299 00 02 90
290 00 05 48
289 00 10 57
280 00 06 28
271 00 02 81
269 00 05 06
बोलपुर रसूलगंज हाट - 114 62 00 03 37
60 00 03 74
59 00 09 75
बोलपुर िशबपुर- 102 295 00 06 49
294 00 03 91
290/602 00 01 37
290/542 00 01 01
288/541 00 00 32
545 00 01 24
288 00 01 18
544 00 00 57
41 00 01 03
41/569 00 05 44
572 00 01 13
569 00 05 44
बोलपुर उत्तर राधानगर- 103 219 00 00 20
216 00 02 00
215 00 02 88
3200 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर उत्तर राधानगर- 103 197 00 08 91
163 00 00 20
164 00 05 62
162 00 01 17
194 00 00 27
192 00 01 07
193 00 00 49
229 00 01 42
221 00 01 52
190 00 02 57
191 00 09 44
बोलपुर रायपुर - 109 10 00 11 63
बोलपुर मेिहदीपुर - 105 2357 00 00 35
2356 00 02 14
2341 00 02 08
2342 00 03 10
2346 00 08 40
2322 00 08 83
2315 00 00 66
2316 00 01 07
2317 00 01 61
2318 00 00 34
2321 00 01 57
2319 00 01 62
2320 00 03 02
2296 00 03 11
2295 00 01 41
2293 00 00 90
3519 00 03 83
3513 00 00 92
3514 00 01 44
3515 00 00 36
2297 00 04 91
2270 00 03 42
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3201
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर मेिहदीपुर - 105 2264 00 06 81
2141 00 06 84
2140 00 03 61
2138 00 01 64
2137 00 05 17
2109 00 07 02
2107 00 00 20
2110 00 01 80
2044 00 01 16
2043 00 06 79
2042 00 10 85
2036 00 04 05
2034 00 01 25
2431 00 07 49
1746 00 01 09
1747 00 00 66
1727 00 04 07
1729 00 02 06
1728 00 03 67
1725 00 06 00
1718 00 00 20
1719 00 09 16
1721 00 00 20
1720 00 00 63
1704 00 01 58
1701 00 01 27
1557 00 02 45
बोलपुर पDिम बहादुरपुर- 53 1598 00 00 20
1586 00 00 33
1585 00 03 08
1584 00 03 89
1583 00 02 72
1579 00 02 11
1577 00 09 17
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 5445 00 01 113202 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 5444 00 06 84
5443 00 01 13
5427 00 07 12
5428 00 04 54
5425 00 04 44
5424 00 11 28
5423 00 01 82
5419 00 01 36
5421 00 06 20
5420 00 00 23
8275 00 04 15
8270/8333 00 02 32
8278 00 02 29
8270 00 05 00
8269 00 04 56
8229 00 06 93
8230 00 05 95
8231 00 01 29
8232 00 00 61
8228 00 02 11
8235 00 03 48
8234 00 05 72
8192/8462 00 04 21
8126 00 00 41
8127 00 01 47
8128 00 00 85
8129 00 06 80
8185 00 03 03
8184 00 00 79
8183 00 03 80
8137 00 01 71
8139 00 00 20
8141 00 04 70
8410 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3203
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 8482 00 03 52
7927 00 00 65
7913 00 08 45
7912 00 03 76
7911 00 00 20
7910 00 03 92
7860 00 01 79
7862 00 00 20
7858 00 01 75
7857 00 00 20
7852 00 00 70
7855 00 03 54
7856 00 01 41
7802 00 00 73
7819 00 00 89
7820 00 05 45
7821 00 03 27
7822 00 00 20
7828 00 03 10
7828/8454 00 05 28
7531 00 00 42
7610 00 02 99
7543 00 03 13
7544 00 00 23
7542 00 01 75
7538 00 01 70
7540/8448 00 03 07
7540 00 01 34
7430 00 00 88
7384 00 00 68
7425 00 02 20
7426 00 04 34
7423 00 00 65
7422 00 01 61
3204 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 7440 00 00 20
7130 00 02 74
7122 00 00 40
7123 00 05 65
7124 00 00 24
7110 00 02 46
7111 00 02 25
3076 00 02 76
7109 00 01 72
3074 00 02 04
3075 00 00 90
3073 00 02 51
3060 00 01 61
3061 00 02 11
3062 00 00 78
3063 00 01 14
3065 00 00 46
3064 00 02 21
3753 00 00 20
3052 00 02 38
3050 00 01 36
3051 00 03 06
3023 00 00 93
3025 00 00 20
3024/3777 00 01 28
2997 00 00 38
2996 00 02 28
2995 00 02 37
2993 00 00 20
2987 00 00 20
2992 00 01 99
2990 00 00 20
2988 00 01 64
2989 00 00 36
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3205
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 2983 00 00 34
2982 00 01 92
2951 00 17 04
2937 00 01 22
2953 00 00 34
2936 00 01 48
2934 00 00 68
2933 00 01 43
2928 00 09 24
2928/8375 00 03 32
506 00 04 76
2926 00 00 25
505 00 00 98
504 00 03 98
8369 00 05 64
429 00 06 38
430 00 08 49
438 00 02 00
439 00 00 27
440 00 00 47
441 00 04 30
442 00 07 90
443 00 02 35
445 00 00 78
446 00 00 20
411 00 04 80
387 00 06 34
383 00 00 36
384 00 00 83
352 00 04 08
385 00 01 44
388 00 03 79
351 00 04 05
350 00 01 52
3206 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
बोलपुर रूपपुर - 52 343 00 07 06
346 00 01 52
344 00 02 15
345 00 00 90
335 00 01 78
332 00 05 87
331 00 04 43
330 00 04 43
326 00 01 86
290 00 05 75
291/8367 00 07 90
291 00 00 54
279 00 03 85
280 00 00 20
278 00 03 45
277 00 02 74
294/8372 00 08 57
293 00 00 73
294 00 10 03
ईल्लमबाज़ार कामारपाड़ा - 131 110 00 00 45
109 00 03 43
86 00 04 72
108 00 01 09
87 00 06 01
89 00 04 69
90 00 02 03
83 00 01 65
82 00 00 73
80 00 03 86
71 00 04 74
81 00 01 06
70 00 05 13
68 00 03 93
67 00 01 38
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3207
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार कामारपाड़ा - 131 33 00 00 20
32 00 06 27
ईल्लमबाज़ार रामनगर- 130 1018 00 06 64
1017 00 01 75
1002 00 00 25
1016 00 00 20
1015 00 02 31
1013 00 02 43
1003 00 02 19
935 00 04 80
936 00 10 30
934 00 02 45
939 00 00 69
941 00 04 96
942 00 02 21
943 00 01 25
944 00 07 51
945 00 02 37
916 00 03 87
915 00 00 49
904 00 05 76
ईल्लमबाज़ार पुरबा नारायणपुर - 114 1033 00 07 76
1037 00 05 90
1039 00 02 95
1040 00 04 29
1022 00 11 71
1020 00 01 70
1021 00 01 31
1019 00 02 90
1018 00 03 30
1016 00 04 16
1016/1101 00 04 54
1015 00 04 83
1014 00 02 88
3208 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार पुरबा नारायणपुर - 114 732 00 04 06
733 00 02 98
734 00 04 91
715 00 00 20
716 00 08 11
714 00 06 24
713 00 03 71
712 00 03 84
669 00 03 66
668 00 03 82
667 00 03 95
494/1114 00 03 91
673 00 02 83
1007/1126 00 01 17
494/1112 00 01 80
494/1111 00 00 82
494 00 09 48
491/1150 00 00 47
492 00 01 85
480 00 05 81
481 00 03 13
482 00 02 18
479 00 06 05
483 00 00 20
485/1159 00 00 24
485/1156 00 00 67
479/1157 00 00 52
485 00 03 01
478 00 00 20
479/1105 00 00 20
471 00 10 07
472 00 07 01
473 00 05 52
474 00 02 21
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3209
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार माटीकोना- 115 1151 00 02 56
1042 00 02 25
1040 00 07 49
1003 00 05 53
1002 00 01 29
1001 00 03 88
997 00 05 88
994 00 03 34
993 00 00 37
992 00 01 81
990 00 01 75
989 00 02 33
980 00 02 14
979 00 01 06
187/1663 00 04 49
186 00 02 96
187/1664 00 03 51
188 00 08 87
189 00 03 05
168 00 03 24
169 00 05 57
170 00 04 58
134 00 00 36
143 00 05 03
135 00 00 20
137 00 03 33
140 00 05 29
138 00 02 25
139 00 01 19
120 00 04 39
121 00 01 82
6 00 05 68
1 00 00 87
5 00 06 81
3210 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार माटीकोना- 115 2 00 00 20
10 00 05 54
ईल्लमबाज़ार गोलटीकु री- 110 2076 00 02 05
2075 00 04 84
2074 00 00 20
2073 00 04 99
2067 00 04 23
2066 00 04 37
ईल्लमबाज़ार पंच तेनतुले - 108 387 00 02 52
391/492 00 00 73
388 00 00 29
389 00 03 68
381 00 00 64
382 00 01 40
497 00 01 65
495 00 04 75
497 00 01 65
495 00 04 75
496 00 01 91
359 00 00 88
360 00 00 40
370 00 03 33
369 00 03 95
363 00 05 50
252 00 03 66
251 00 00 33
247 00 03 54
254 00 00 30
246 00 05 42
245 00 00 22
244 00 03 54
240 00 00 20
241 00 03 70
230 00 03 26
ईल्लमबाज़ार कायरा- 107 2353 00 03 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3211
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार कायरा- 107 2371 00 00 20
2354 00 04 78
2355 00 00 20
2367 00 04 60
2366 00 02 83
2356 00 03 04
2323 00 03 02
2322 00 00 61
2324 00 01 38
2320 00 03 42
2324/3346 00 00 43
2318 00 02 50
2317/3342 00 04 45
2298 00 02 27
2156 00 04 83
2300 00 00 20
2146 00 01 33
2147 00 02 42
2148 00 02 70
2142 00 01 88
2149 00 01 13
2150 00 05 57
2134 00 10 81
2425 00 00 85
2426 00 00 95
2430 00 02 61
2431 00 03 58
2429 00 02 30
2432 00 03 61
2435 00 02 09
2434 00 02 24
2125 00 00 29
2437/3209 00 05 43
1471 00 02 86
3212 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार कायरा- 107 1473 00 03 12
1474 00 00 36
1475 00 00 47
1487 00 00 38
1454/1991 00 03 73
1490 00 00 53
1454 00 00 66
1453 00 08 23
1452 00 02 24
1424 00 00 20
1425 00 04 40
1426 00 01 71
1429 00 00 61
1427 00 00 51
1428 00 03 26
1432 00 00 20
1427/1982 00 01 25
1433 00 02 06
1436 00 00 20
ईल्लमबाज़ार पािचयारा- 106 2040 00 00 78
2042 00 00 20
2041 00 03 41
2044 00 01 01
2056 00 05 09
2055 00 01 20
2054 00 02 51
2052 00 00 89
2061 00 00 20
2053 00 02 53
2051 00 00 30
2050 00 02 74
2024 00 05 18
2019 00 03 35
2007 00 05 50
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3213
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार पािचयारा- 106 2002 00 00 22
2003 00 01 84
2001 00 03 07
1987 00 02 77
1988 00 01 86
1986 00 01 70
1499 00 00 41
1978 00 00 20
1979 00 03 96
1977 00 03 45
1976 00 05 30
1963 00 00 98
1975 00 04 48
1975/2286 00 01 44
1973 00 00 20
1974 00 06 40
1970 00 03 30
1969 00 01 34
1967 00 03 48
1968 00 01 46
1870 00 00 82
1871 00 07 29
1868 00 06 07
1865 00 05 36
1864 00 01 10
1863 00 01 08
1866 00 00 20
1595 00 07 70
1596 00 00 93
1598 00 00 21
1597 00 13 03
1624/2318 00 03 06
1624/2319 00 09 25
1845 00 13 04
3214 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार पािचयारा- 106 1655 00 02 66
1653 00 01 04
1654 00 03 26
1656 00 00 84
ईल्लमबाज़ार पाईकु िन- 105 1738 00 04 14
1737 00 02 56
1735 00 02 91
1739 00 00 53
1734 00 02 72
1740 00 00 20
1741 00 01 50
1726 00 02 47
1725 00 03 23
1724 00 02 27
1704 00 00 65
1270 00 10 20
1269 00 10 33
1271 00 01 75
1278 00 03 01
1279 00 02 95
1280 00 00 46
1281 00 01 40
1184/1838 00 03 16
1285 00 01 57
1283 00 00 20
1284 00 00 36
1292 00 00 20
1288 00 02 11
1290 00 00 34
1291 00 02 34
1297 00 03 47
1295 00 00 20
1296 00 00 20
1298 00 03 01
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3215
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार पाईकु िन- 105 1107 00 02 33
1110 00 01 00
1108 00 00 80
1111 00 01 82
350 00 01 01
1001 00 02 54
1003 00 02 18
1002 00 02 61
999 00 03 41
938 00 00 75
939 00 03 86
940 00 03 21
941 00 02 05
944 00 02 03
946 00 01 36
947 00 02 20
948 00 01 07
949 00 00 66
950 00 03 77
954 00 01 06
953 00 01 54
956 00 02 80
955 00 01 25
887 00 02 22
958 00 01 27
886 00 03 21
959 00 03 02
960/1909 00 01 60
885 00 00 20
ईल्लमबाज़ार नृपति bाम- 43 1274 00 03 99
1275 00 07 02
1276 00 00 45
1277 00 06 34
1254 00 03 85
3216 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार नृपति bाम- 43 1279 00 03 15
1311 00 05 02
1314 00 07 37
1320 00 07 38
1321 00 04 00
1333 00 01 61
1332 00 00 23
1331 00 02 11
1330/1830 00 01 86
1330 00 03 08
1335 00 01 24
1336 00 02 10
1334 00 00 20
855 00 05 52
854 00 05 17
ईल्लमबाज़ार गोपीनाथपुर- 44 3965 00 05 66
3963 00 02 81
3964 00 00 65
3962 00 01 79
3961 00 01 12
3951 00 03 68
3950 00 03 49
3943 00 02 23
3949 00 00 20
3948 00 04 60
3882 00 03 36
3916 00 05 81
3915 00 03 61
3892 00 05 29
3894 00 04 58
3901 00 03 61
ईल्लमबाज़ार गोपीनाथपुर- 44 3902 00 05 94
3868 00 03 40
3867 00 02 64
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3217
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार गोपीनाथपुर- 44 3859 00 04 98
3860 00 01 42
3840 00 04 01
3841 00 03 27
3839 00 04 63
3838 00 02 32
3836 00 02 79
3592 00 00 31
3679 00 05 84
3665 00 05 59
3664 00 02 45
3682 00 02 76
3678/4060 00 00 56
3685 00 00 99
3684 00 05 41
3688 00 04 13
ईल्लमबाज़ार राकोना- 45 625 00 02 33
626 00 02 50
627 00 00 20
629/988 00 04 00
579 00 00 20
580 00 07 06
578/956 00 05 22
571 00 04 18
572 00 03 33
573 00 03 33
561 00 02 94
543 00 01 67
544 00 03 86
545 00 03 96
547 00 00 20
546 00 02 28
548/918 00 02 27
689 00 02 90
3218 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार राकोना- 45 696 00 00 81
690 00 03 95
692 00 00 44
692/955 00 00 52
691 00 01 43
854 00 00 20
868 00 04 80
867 00 01 35
865 00 00 98
866 00 02 75
883 00 02 67
884 00 03 80
885 00 03 49
ईल्लमबाज़ार धरमपुर - 46 1926 00 04 00
1927 00 02 21
1929 00 03 37
1930 00 04 45
1933 00 04 73
1890 00 04 70
1892 00 00 20
1891 00 00 46
1584 00 01 18
1795 00 01 34
1795/2088 00 00 72
1796 00 01 47
1793 00 06 28
1797/2535 00 02 62
1798 00 01 76
1791 00 00 85
1792 00 00 20
1695 00 04 14
1694 00 01 83
1693 00 01 63
1688 00 04 38
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3219
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार धरमपुर - 46 1680 00 00 20
1679 00 00 20
1633 00 08 27
1623/2529 00 01 63
1640 00 02 30
1639 00 02 85
1638 00 01 32
1637 00 01 16
1636 00 05 12
1625/2528 00 05 65
1629 00 03 58
1627 00 01 86
1926 00 04 00
ईल्लमबाज़ार सूनूट - 47 572 00 01 41
573 00 01 49
574 00 01 97
569 00 00 71
567 00 03 96
566 00 02 08
562 00 24 07
565 00 01 56
560 00 04 65
527 00 00 70
528 00 00 95
529 00 01 50
526 00 01 70
533 00 01 34
534 00 04 75
519 00 00 61
518 00 01 55
535 00 01 24
421 00 00 35
225 00 01 10
226 00 01 03
227 00 02 35
3220 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार सूनूट - 47 229 00 00 35
222 00 03 18
260 00 03 52
261 00 00 82
262 00 02 29
263 00 00 97
265 00 02 07
264 00 00 88
267 00 00 26
266 00 03 70
271 00 05 80
183/1101 00 01 00
274 00 00 94
182 00 02 38
181 00 02 43
277 00 03 69
171 00 00 20
170 00 01 92
169 00 00 85
167 00 02 93
111 00 06 11
112 00 00 20
110 00 00 20
115 00 03 20
116 00 04 60
119 00 11 48
123 00 00 70
122 00 06 60
121 00 04 31
32 00 03 88
31 00 03 10
30 00 00 20
29 00 02 23
17 00 04 43
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3221
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार सूनूट - 47 11 00 02 25
2 00 01 01
6 00 05 72
ईल्लमबाज़ार सलका - 48 1291 00 05 79
1297 00 01 34
1296 00 02 65
1300 00 02 13
1295 00 07 32
1293 00 02 21
1294 00 01 87
1266 00 03 10
1228 00 00 20
1265 00 02 51
1264/1389 00 03 23
1234/1386 00 02 35
1235 00 03 18
1236 00 05 51
1237 00 02 96
1239 00 06 50
1243 00 02 33
1206 00 02 80
1166 00 06 00
1167 00 03 81
1168 00 01 26
1169 00 03 93
1171 00 02 65
1172 00 03 02
1173 00 03 33
1174 00 04 92
1175 00 03 71
674 00 04 43
675 00 03 35
676 00 02 51
677 00 01 88
662 00 00 49
661 00 03 49
3222 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
ईल्लमबाज़ार सलका - 48 659 00 03 23
657 00 02 64
650 00 00 20
651 00 04 22
652 00 00 49
642 00 02 71
643 00 01 80
638 00 05 80
641 00 04 77
702 00 01 83
703 00 00 37
564 00 03 71
640 00 03 41
639 00 00 42
566 00 02 74
563 00 03 12
568/1402 00 08 99
568 00 00 40
613 00 04 34
615 00 02 46
617 00 03 72
दुबराजपुर खगरा- 210 316 00 00 62
315 00 03 84
314 00 04 55
313 00 01 20
312 00 01 92
311 00 03 85
310 00 00 77
307 00 01 20
308/424 00 00 20
345 00 05 79
258/366 00 02 17
256 00 04 92
110 00 04 37
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3223
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर खगरा- 210 115 00 01 30
114 00 04 52
105 00 14 19
118 00 03 75
119 00 01 14
104 00 07 47
74/417 00 00 33
90 00 00 62
88 00 03 79
87 00 08 29
86 00 03 06
85 00 00 20
35 00 04 33
31 00 09 08
33 00 00 22
32 00 03 04
17 00 05 14
19 00 00 31
18 00 02 31
20/355 00 04 33
1 00 01 04
दुबराजपुर पदुमा - 211 2125 00 05 52
2121 00 10 90
2120 00 08 57
2119 00 06 44
दुबराजपुर बोधbाम- 208 936 00 01 02
993 00 00 55
992 00 04 06
997 00 07 13
985 00 03 46
984 00 04 88
983 00 00 53
982 00 03 78
978 00 05 08
3224 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर बोधbाम- 208 960 00 06 27
959 00 02 76
958 00 03 43
952 00 00 20
954 00 04 27
954/1470 00 02 63
874 00 03 17
867 00 00 40
873 00 02 96
875 00 06 91
877 00 02 09
876 00 05 32
878 00 02 82
852 00 01 92
839 00 00 70
840 00 07 13
841 00 04 52
827 00 01 71
826 00 02 45
824 00 00 20
825 00 04 06
दुबराजपुर कोटा - 158 1605 00 06 96
1589 00 06 01
1588 00 06 90
1587 00 01 84
दुबराजपुर भालुका- 207 277 00 07 66
232 00 07 29
231 00 04 87
227 00 08 46
224 00 00 89
225 00 00 20
87 00 00 51
86 00 02 50
91 00 03 29
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3225
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर भालुका- 207 81 00 04 90
94 00 01 44
95 00 03 41
99 00 04 47
98 00 03 50
37 00 00 22
36 00 04 27
29 00 00 27
34 00 03 37
30 00 00 20
31 00 01 07
33 00 01 20
दुबराजपुर दक्षिन चांदीपुर - 160 274 00 01 57
273 00 06 88
682 00 03 50
681 00 07 49
269 00 08 69
दुबराजपुर िबरोरी- 164 835 00 01 15
815 00 08 51
816 00 02 31
813 00 04 32
658 00 02 72
659 00 01 39
656 00 02 64
655 00 01 58
663 00 00 99
665 00 04 66
653 00 01 74
647 00 00 20
646 00 01 26
645 00 07 34
473 00 07 11
492 00 01 56
504 00 02 08
503 00 02 29
494 00 00 20
3226 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर िबरोरी- 164 495 00 01 74
502 00 00 20
496 00 03 23
491 00 00 90
490 00 04 06
489 00 01 07
477 00 00 91
407 00 00 27
408/903 00 00 86
406 00 02 86
405/902 00 03 02
405 00 01 27
403 00 00 74
404 00 00 76
402 00 00 20
397 00 01 87
396 00 03 94
888 00 00 36
449 00 01 78
448 00 00 34
450 00 03 30
383/844 00 06 59
383 00 02 19
382/929 00 03 14
386 00 04 23
दुबराजपुर रेंगना- 163 2465 00 00 20
2459 00 04 08
2458 00 03 96
2450 00 05 24
2451 00 03 42
2449 00 03 40
2370 00 02 93
2369/2582 00 01 48
2369 00 08 22
2366 00 05 33
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3227
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर रेंगना- 163 2381 00 01 90
2382 00 01 23
2378 00 00 20
2385 00 06 55
2387 00 05 60
2395 00 03 24
2386 00 00 31
2396 00 02 66
2397 00 02 47
2398 00 04 19
2400 00 04 60
961 00 02 28
963 00 00 20
959 00 06 18
830 00 03 06
957/1202 00 02 75
833 00 00 89
834 00 04 24
835 00 00 20
836 00 02 82
843 00 00 81
844 00 00 20
842 00 03 27
841 00 01 42
840 00 00 44
839 00 00 56
853 00 00 59
788 00 06 37
787 00 01 62
786 00 02 96
783 00 00 38
782 00 02 17
781 00 06 03
778 00 01 01
3228 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर रेंगना- 163 543 00 00 20
544 00 05 40
546 00 00 82
539 00 02 47
523 00 00 43
537 00 00 47
538 00 03 18
532 00 02 68
531 00 05 09
530 00 00 20
526 00 01 90
529 00 04 30
528 00 01 43
215 00 01 94
334/1093 00 04 64
338/1092 00 03 51
338 00 00 83
335 00 03 63
336 00 04 71
1153 00 01 70
315 00 01 63
312 00 02 94
313 00 00 47
309 00 01 72
306 00 00 29
305 00 08 25
278 00 03 80
280 00 00 20
279 00 02 59
274 00 02 03
273 00 04 53
282 00 01 62
283 00 02 08
284/1140 00 01 00
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3229
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर रेंगना- 163 286 00 03 03
287 00 00 84
9 00 06 54
8 00 06 22
6 00 00 42
दुबराजपुर दक्षिन गोपालपुर- 150 239 00 12 14
14 00 00 20
237/318 00 04 61
दुबराजपुर पिचयारा - 168 3428 00 03 21
3346 00 05 24
3427 00 03 79
3426 00 00 64
3389/3532 00 00 20
3390 00 10 60
3391 00 01 23
3393 00 00 43
3397 00 01 83
3396 00 00 84
3395 00 05 32
3370 00 05 78
3362 00 00 23
3369 00 01 27
2678 00 03 24
2673 00 01 33
2672 00 00 20
2679 00 05 57
2709 00 00 65
2708 00 03 21
2705 00 03 12
2682 00 04 25
2683 00 01 79
2700 00 04 40
2686 00 00 20
2694 00 00 20
2696 00 00 91
2697 00 02 84
3230 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पिचयारा - 168 2698 00 00 74
2692 00 02 76
2691 00 00 24
2742 00 01 86
2743 00 03 73
2132 00 00 80
2766 00 03 68
2126 00 04 00
2125 00 04 48
2088 00 02 36
2089 00 02 53
2092 00 00 20
2093 00 02 67
2094 00 00 47
2095 00 00 20
2096 00 02 33
2098 00 00 20
2097 00 01 47
2068 00 04 84
2826 00 02 22
2827 00 00 21
1819 00 02 60
1818 00 06 90
1766 00 00 20
1767 00 01 24
1817 00 00 20
1769 00 01 84
1816 00 02 83
1814 00 01 71
1815 00 02 41
1778 00 00 78
1803 00 02 66
1801 00 02 42
1852 00 01 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3231
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पिचयारा - 168 1856 00 00 20
1860 00 02 12
1861 00 01 10
1859 00 00 36
1862 00 02 06
1889 00 00 20
1888 00 02 85
1887 00 02 27
1886 00 01 92
1876 00 03 16
1875 00 00 20
1877 00 01 85
1878 00 02 40
1879 00 00 80
1743 00 00 94
1640 00 00 54
1637 00 00 20
1635 00 00 35
1636 00 02 29
1634 00 01 67
1621 00 00 20
1632 00 01 80
1630 00 00 96
1628 00 00 20
1629 00 02 41
696 00 00 20
691 00 01 56
695 00 00 20
692 00 03 35
694 00 00 20
685 00 00 20
682 00 00 71
684 00 03 32
683 00 02 18
665/1588 00 01 443232 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पिचयारा - 168 658 00 01 55
663 00 01 11
662 00 01 61
538 00 05 89
537 00 00 20
539 00 05 25
522 00 00 20
521/1579 00 02 00
520 00 04 78
519 00 00 83
515 00 03 69
213/1524 00 04 74
दुबराजपुर चन्(cid:12)पुर- 169 1939 00 16 38
1851 00 01 91
1850 00 04 37
1849 00 05 53
1858 00 00 20
1859 00 00 66
1860 00 01 69
1861 00 01 41
1862 00 01 12
1863 00 01 48
1864 00 02 76
1830 00 00 20
1823 00 01 00
1865 00 02 26
1866 00 00 43
1821 00 03 15
1813 00 03 95
1812 00 02 48
1811 00 00 22
1808 00 00 63
1809 00 02 35
1810 00 00 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3233
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर चन्(cid:12)पुर- 169 1806 00 02 59
1804 00 02 28
1441/1955 00 00 20
1441 00 04 38
1438 00 03 57
1437 00 01 57
1435 00 00 20
1433 00 01 71
1127 00 01 03
1453 00 00 48
1454 00 02 23
1455 00 01 15
1458 00 00 59
1457 00 02 13
1460 00 00 20
1461 00 03 10
1463 00 02 46
1462 00 00 20
1467 00 02 20
1468 00 02 54
1105 00 00 20
1498 00 04 86
1096 00 00 20
1097 00 00 58
1087 00 02 43
1083 00 00 20
1081 00 02 96
1082 00 01 13
1074 00 01 00
1073 00 01 88
1072 00 00 20
1064/2004 00 01 90
1065 00 01 17
1070 00 01 04
3234 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर चन्(cid:12)पुर- 169 1069 00 01 88
1046 00 02 07
1045 00 00 76
1044 00 02 40
1039 00 01 08
1958 00 00 73
1040 00 01 36
1038 00 00 20
998 00 04 26
697 00 00 21
695 00 00 67
696 00 00 20
694 00 01 61
693 00 00 20
665 00 04 55
658 00 04 36
664 00 00 20
660 00 00 20
662 00 00 31
661 00 01 85
663 00 00 64
605 00 00 32
603 00 01 62
602 00 00 98
589 00 00 64
590 00 00 74
591 00 03 00
592 00 02 42
588 00 02 53
577 00 00 29
587 00 01 08
578 00 00 20
586 00 01 11
580 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3235
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर चन्(cid:12)पुर- 169 582 00 01 58
559 00 01 61
दुबराजपुर हेतमपुर - 143 217 00 00 39
218 00 00 87
232 00 00 91
227 00 00 20
233 00 00 20
231 00 01 44
230 00 01 77
234 00 00 20
244 00 01 96
245 00 00 25
224 00 02 26
249 00 01 83
248 00 00 22
252 00 00 93
259 00 02 22
258 00 00 20
253 00 02 97
254 00 00 93
197 00 01 51
279 00 00 45
198 00 00 20
195 00 00 81
196 00 01 62
280 00 04 12
175 00 06 60
282 00 00 23
172 00 01 74
170 00 00 20
171 00 02 13
160 00 02 77
150 00 02 33
143/1332 00 01 79
143/1331 00 03 93
3236 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर हेतमपुर - 143 137/875 00 00 90
155 00 00 20
137 00 04 79
136 00 03 74
135 00 01 92
159 00 00 24
दुबराजपुर मोहनपुर- 142 601 00 06 20
605/650 00 01 19
602/649 00 02 93
602 00 05 27
600 00 00 36
599 00 02 28
598 00 05 91
370 00 00 75
369 00 02 12
372 00 00 27
371 00 00 20
367 00 07 52
368 00 03 83
355 00 03 20
352 00 00 42
353 00 07 74
353/416 00 00 55
343 00 01 45
311 00 00 20
343/426 00 01 62
390 00 07 78
65 00 03 31
68 00 05 55
72 00 01 30
74 00 03 95
75 00 00 46
77 00 00 20
58 00 04 76
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3237
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर मोहनपुर- 142 52 00 02 55
51 00 03 01
49 00 00 20
90 00 01 28
2 00 10 06
1 00 01 32
दुबराजपुर सत के नदूरी - 104 1978 00 04 65
1986 00 00 59
1979 00 00 51
1982 00 00 46
1983 00 00 26
2267 00 00 74
2006 00 01 67
2266 00 00 43
1939 00 00 20
1941 00 00 20
1939 00 01 47
1940 00 00 46
1938 00 02 31
1937 00 01 97
1935 00 06 18
1933 00 02 89
1934 00 03 37
दुबराजपुर इस्लामपुर - 140 853 00 02 69
858 00 00 66
854 00 06 86
855 00 02 85
846 00 03 10
847 00 00 20
844 00 00 36
842 00 01 54
843 00 02 26
827 00 00 36
828 00 01 79
3238 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर इस्लामपुर - 140 831 00 13 11
181 00 09 43
दुबराजपुर बेलेशुली- 139 755 00 14 93
672 00 02 36
671 00 00 23
670 00 01 20
673 00 01 38
674 00 03 27
543 00 03 77
545 00 00 20
542 00 04 17
541 00 00 20
520 00 03 42
540 00 00 26
522 00 00 52
523 00 01 40
524 00 01 12
526 00 01 38
527 00 01 71
529 00 00 46
525 00 01 19
528 00 01 97
472 00 00 20
504 00 02 22
503 00 00 76
503/804 00 01 70
503/803 00 00 80
475 00 03 99
474 00 00 38
488 00 00 57
487 00 00 68
486 00 00 91
485 00 01 07
484 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3239
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर बेलेशुली- 139 337 00 00 20
336/749 00 00 83
421 00 03 48
360 00 00 44
361 00 03 51
376 00 00 69
375 00 00 61
374 00 01 37
368 00 01 58
371 00 00 24
370 00 01 09
391 00 00 29
394/780 00 01 53
394 00 00 21
397 00 14 26
392 00 00 53
398 00 00 62
782 00 05 29
781 00 04 96
74 00 00 26
दुबराजपुर अस्दुल्ला - 106 844 00 21 56
843 00 00 70
842 00 13 73
711 00 00 85
710 00 05 24
712 00 02 96
709 00 00 65
713 00 03 89
707 00 04 61
705 00 04 47
675 00 04 78
593 00 00 39
594 00 00 95
592 00 00 58
3240 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर अस्दुल्ला - 106 586 00 00 90
587 00 03 91
585 00 02 36
684 00 07 78
683 00 00 20
685 00 00 20
581 00 03 30
686 00 00 20
685 00 03 90
694 00 05 60
693 00 00 44
690 00 06 12
691 00 00 73
दुबराजपुर नुनेडी- 110 133 00 00 96
132 00 05 08
141 00 02 09
130 00 02 67
142 00 03 66
129 00 05 91
143 00 05 01
151 00 04 26
152 00 02 89
49 00 00 99
50 00 00 20
52 00 03 37
48 00 00 20
45 00 01 50
53 00 00 84
55 00 02 38
54/169 00 00 70
54 00 00 87
17 00 10 74
24 00 00 49
23 00 04 93
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3241
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर नुनेडी- 110 15 00 00 20
16 00 05 09
दुबराजपुर पन्डितपुर- 111 1509 00 04 30
1508 00 00 20
1643 00 05 98
1644 00 00 52
1645 00 10 17
1651 00 01 35
1323 00 00 94
1337 00 04 67
1367 00 00 54
1366 00 05 30
1365 00 05 14
1364 00 00 97
1362/1706 00 02 30
1363 00 00 20
1372 00 01 09
1362 00 01 94
1362/1707 00 01 89
1132 00 01 04
1629 00 04 15
1690 00 03 48
1133 00 00 20
1145 00 07 56
1146 00 00 20
1139 00 00 78
1144 00 00 95
1143 00 00 48
1141 00 02 71
1142 00 03 48
1021 00 13 13
1025 00 00 20
1020 00 00 73
983 00 07 52
3242 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पन्डितपुर- 111 981 00 02 17
270 00 01 29
269 00 02 20
267 00 00 30
59 00 01 70
57 00 01 33
56 00 00 70
54 00 03 63
675 00 01 25
974 00 01 40
583 00 00 20
667/1717 00 00 88
दुबराजपुर जंगल दुबराजपुर - 138 74 00 01 23
72 00 14 64
73/794 00 00 21
दुबराजपुर रूपसिमुली- 112 688 00 00 20
690 00 00 56
695 00 01 53
696 00 02 19
697 00 12 59
697/1516 00 02 74
701 00 01 22
700 00 00 96
706 00 04 33
705 00 00 20
708 00 00 42
636 00 04 09
635 00 04 30
634 00 02 07
432 00 00 20
631 00 01 21
615 00 00 20
614 00 02 98
618 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3243
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर रूपसिमुली- 112 592 00 00 57
462 00 08 16
463 00 03 12
461 00 00 20
466 00 03 76
465 00 02 14
467 00 00 94
468 00 04 77
469 00 02 78
498 00 00 66
499 00 01 08
495 00 02 55
494 00 01 26
493 00 00 58
796 00 01 46
509 00 05 50
510 00 02 99
512 00 00 63
521 00 07 92
520 00 01 22
527 00 04 19
71 00 00 41
62 00 01 75
529 00 01 77
दुबराजपुर कायथानपुर - 24 360 00 02 61
361 00 01 21
362 00 02 35
378 00 04 69
365 00 00 20
377 00 02 91
376 00 02 00
371 00 01 28
370 00 01 98
329 00 04 07
330 00 01 89
3244 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर कायथानपुर - 24 326 00 03 78
327 00 01 66
323 00 01 56
324 00 00 20
283 00 05 97
279 00 01 95
284 00 02 93
269 00 00 56
272 00 00 22
270 00 01 23
271 00 00 20
268 00 00 36
263 00 00 48
253 00 00 99
254 00 00 41
256 00 00 20
252 00 06 40
250 00 01 91
दुबराजपुर होसेनाबाद - 25 261 00 03 67
256 00 01 34
238 00 02 68
202 00 02 87
199 00 00 87
201 00 01 41
198 00 02 18
197 00 04 04
195 00 02 00
196 00 02 76
183 00 03 57
181 00 01 34
180 00 01 61
179 00 01 49
163 00 18 81
164 00 01 45
दुबराजपुर पंच पखुरिया- 26 468 00 00 90
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3245
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पंच पखुरिया- 26 330 00 03 03
331 00 07 47
327 00 09 22
315 00 05 08
313 00 03 47
317 00 03 61
274 00 01 36
320 00 00 79
319 00 02 58
272 00 00 79
273 00 06 47
दुबराजपुर ह\लिया - 27 430 00 01 17
420 00 01 03
419 00 00 20
421 00 05 01
427 00 01 81
424 00 00 21
429 00 00 20
426 00 01 68
425 00 00 92
410 00 03 50
411 00 01 14
408 00 03 72
409 00 02 52
440 00 00 30
371 00 00 64
372 00 02 82
369 00 02 63
352 00 02 73
350 00 03 40
351 00 02 19
349 00 01 88
467 00 01 01
453 00 00 55
3246 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर ह\लिया - 27 231 00 03 84
125 00 10 44
दुबराजपुर बालीजुरी - 21 604 00 03 16
221/2808 00 01 05
221/642 00 05 21
615 00 02 31
221/2810 00 00 53
616 00 01 36
221/2811 00 00 28
618 00 00 89
617 00 00 20
619 00 00 53
620 00 01 61
621 00 00 20
587 00 00 45
622 00 02 62
624 00 00 47
581 00 02 55
578 00 02 71
576 00 00 20
577 00 00 29
2772 00 01 39
1 00 24 35
2756 00 09 65
2882 00 01 13
दुबराजपुर गोपालनगर- 30 1197 00 00 57
1196 00 59 09
1191 00 01 63
1190 00 17 05
1500 00 02 56
दुबराजपुर अगोया - 7 544 00 02 98
545 00 05 48
555 00 06 00
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3247
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर अगोया - 7 514 00 12 13
515 00 01 93
516 00 00 20
509 00 07 53
508 00 03 66
507 00 04 86
494 00 06 55
649 00 07 73
489 00 06 53
488 00 02 40
646 00 08 82
486 00 03 02
464 00 12 44
465 00 03 56
466 00 04 14
467 00 07 39
468 00 01 17
466 00 00 58
दुबराजपुर कू रालजुरी - 6 580 00 00 60
662 00 03 97
663 00 07 89
664 00 04 65
1095 00 01 55
1091 00 06 12
1089 00 00 20
1088 00 00 49
1085 00 02 05
1087 00 01 44
1086 00 01 04
1084 00 01 28
1083 00 03 32
1095/1173 00 00 26
1082 00 01 25
1081 00 01 55
1079 00 00 983248 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर कू रालजुरी - 6 1078 00 00 80
688 00 08 61
1056 00 00 39
1055 00 00 30
1054 00 00 27
1053 00 00 20
1139 00 12 77
690 00 04 11
691 00 06 99
700 00 01 48
1106 00 00 99
725 00 02 80
724 00 04 39
723 00 00 86
722 00 09 01
717 00 00 23
719 00 02 68
718 00 02 76
351 00 01 21
354 00 01 68
350 00 00 39
359 00 00 20
358 00 02 46
356 00 04 00
357 00 02 31
360 00 00 22
361 00 00 20
363 00 01 03
365 00 03 80
364 00 00 20
366 00 00 20
377 00 00 20
376 00 00 85
375 00 00 68
373 00 00 88[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3249
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर कू रालजुरी - 6 372 00 01 55
411 00 00 61
413 00 03 63
412 00 01 88
371 00 01 89
323 00 00 21
417 00 09 82
416 00 04 48
419 00 00 20
428 00 00 20
427 00 04 22
423 00 00 55
425 00 01 83
426 00 02 71
91/1113 00 00 64
91 00 08 71
91/1114 00 00 20
96 00 09 06
114 00 03 69
115 00 01 01
113 00 00 20
97 00 02 26
101 00 00 29
102 00 03 61
100 00 00 54
103 00 01 52
104 00 02 17
87 00 01 09
58 00 01 03
57 00 01 84
56 00 02 70
65 00 01 91
55 00 01 72
43 00 00 20
3250 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर कू रालजुरी - 6 45 00 01 29
14 00 00 20
46 00 09 09
15 00 10 26
16 00 00 23
दुबराजपुर खोलाकु नरी - 5 1026 00 02 24
1027 00 02 18
1028 00 00 20
1022 00 01 34
1024 00 00 64
1025 00 18 96
1033 00 03 71
1001 00 00 45
1000 00 04 15
999 00 03 55
998 00 02 28
997 00 04 49
995 00 00 63
996 00 08 31
298 00 12 06
286 00 01 77
288 00 02 74
289 00 01 05
290 00 07 82
260 00 02 05
259 00 01 52
241 00 04 77
240 00 01 28
236 00 07 25
235 00 02 86
199 00 02 36
200 00 01 48
201 00 02 47
202 00 02 89
223 00 01 11[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3251
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर खोलाकु नरी - 5 224 00 04 49
220 00 04 35
222 00 00 46
219 00 02 16
218 00 02 20
216 00 00 20
217 00 01 11
65 00 00 47
43 00 00 20
42 00 04 74
49 00 08 39
32 00 01 51
33 00 01 38
31 00 00 32
3/1179 00 05 58
2 00 03 69
3 00 01 21
दुबराजपुर लcमी नारायनपुर - 4 684 00 1 22
311 00 01 87
215 00 01 65
310 00 04 28
दुबराजपुर पु ंगलापुर- 3 964 00 00 58
963 00 00 23
962 00 00 39
961 00 00 50
960 00 08 58
523/1275 00 00 63
517 00 02 75
518 00 00 39
519 00 01 10
521/1295 00 00 20
499 00 04 30
497 00 00 20
516 00 01 30
501 00 01 473252 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पु ंगलापुर- 3 500 00 02 51
489 00 01 64
490 00 01 68
488 00 03 92
487 00 01 43
478 00 00 85
480 00 00 20
479 00 00 80
475 00 02 01
477 00 00 30
453 00 00 66
474 00 00 20
447 00 00 98
181 00 00 61
446 00 01 30
437 00 01 83
436 00 02 47
440 00 00 20
422 00 01 67
423 00 00 76
424 00 00 78
426 00 01 61
427 00 01 13
417 00 00 25
411 00 02 00
410 00 02 38
408 00 01 07
412 00 00 28
413 00 00 55
371 00 01 08
407 00 00 53
372 00 02 19
373 00 02 03
273 00 05 10
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3253
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
दुबराजपुर पु ंगलापुर- 3 275 00 01 06
271 00 03 89
268 00 07 39
267 00 00 20
245/1282 00 01 20
258 00 13 77
259 00 00 37
245 00 05 94
249 00 03 16
खायरासोल आनन्दनगर- 12 1979 00 02 06
1978 00 00 65
1977 00 05 64
1976 00 00 74
1965 00 10 02
1972 00 10 86
498 00 06 40
493 00 07 14
499 00 00 20
492 00 01 68
502 00 03 16
283 00 00 23
488 00 01 73
487 00 00 84
486 00 00 78
284 00 02 23
287 00 08 21
285 00 04 19
286 00 03 51
288 00 00 78
289 00 00 82
295 00 02 16
294 00 05 11
302 00 12 42
303 00 00 20
3254 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल आनन्दनगर- 12 305 00 03 28
308 00 04 24
312 00 00 22
37 00 01 85
36 00 02 22
35 00 03 04
47 00 01 13
46 00 01 79
50 00 00 51
48 00 00 93
31 00 04 57
52 00 02 31
68 00 05 47
80 00 03 29
खायरासोल बुधपुर- 11 375 00 05 06
376 00 05 82
377 00 01 74
378 00 03 60
391 00 05 15
392 00 03 56
389 00 07 53
410 00 00 20
409 00 01 65
408 00 00 94
407 00 01 13
412 00 03 22
413 00 00 60
627 00 00 94
414 00 02 49
620 00 02 90
621 00 00 20
616 00 02 06
617 00 07 48
575 00 00 40
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3255
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल बुधपुर- 11 612 00 01 94
588 00 01 07
582 00 02 98
587 00 00 38
583 00 00 32
584 00 01 96
586 00 00 20
585 00 00 87
593 00 03 84
787 00 02 25
786 00 03 90
788 00 01 52
790 00 02 21
797 00 00 20
791 00 01 82
792 00 01 92
793 00 00 20
794 00 04 66
69 00 00 27
खायरासोल हरिपुर- 10 1389 00 00 51
718 00 00 20
717 00 01 32
715/1342 00 00 50
716 00 01 22
714 00 00 96
712/1318 00 01 00
713 00 00 20
712 00 05 34
733/1253 00 00 20
733 00 00 45
755 00 01 03
754 00 02 57
752 00 01 69
767 00 02 71
3256 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल हरिपुर- 10 770 00 02 12
771 00 02 48
773 00 00 20
772 00 01 41
783 00 02 87
784 00 00 20
802 00 03 15
802/1252 00 03 16
803 00 01 90
948 00 01 64
950 00 03 70
959 00 01 38
958 00 00 20
957 00 00 86
960 00 00 67
956 00 01 09
955 00 00 95
561 00 06 56
1278 00 00 20
560 00 06 38
1388 00 00 28
963 00 00 20
559 00 00 57
558 00 02 09
557 00 00 95
542 00 00 27
खायरासोल अलीयत- 8 1905 00 00 37
1563 00 03 18
1564 00 02 64
1562 00 02 32
1565 00 00 20
1561 00 06 46
1560 00 04 73
1559 00 03 22
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3257
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल अलीयत- 8 1549 00 00 28
1547 00 00 73
1545 00 02 08
1546 00 00 69
1544 00 02 59
1543 00 01 23
1542 00 00 70
1540 00 02 63
1539 00 01 93
1312 00 01 72
1311 00 01 28
1310 00 00 79
1309 00 03 23
1307 00 02 11
1306 00 02 59
1305 00 01 31
1304 00 01 31
1303 00 01 87
1301 00 00 20
1300 00 04 10
1348 00 01 13
1293 00 00 20
1291 00 04 35
1285 00 02 30
1287 00 00 62
1286 00 00 55
1288 00 00 20
खायरासोल अमलाकु री - 9 490 00 00 20
424/1127 00 00 26
517 00 03 20
खायरासोल कें दुयाकु री- 7 578 00 01 58
579/657 00 02 10
579/658 00 00 20
577 00 02 52
576 00 02 39
3258 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल कें दुयाकु री- 7 574 00 03 78
573 00 00 38
571 00 00 20
544 00 02 12
543 00 00 40
545 00 01 48
551 00 01 43
550 00 00 62
552 00 00 99
539 00 03 13
528 00 00 21
553 00 05 08
517 00 02 89
518 00 01 54
502 00 03 49
501 00 01 49
492 00 01 72
493 00 04 09
485 00 00 47
627 00 04 40
479 00 01 71
626 00 00 20
324 00 01 95
323 00 05 23
329 00 01 59
330 00 01 54
460/650 00 00 73
331 00 01 40
393 00 04 11
394 00 04 25
417 00 00 20
396 00 02 53
397 00 00 27
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3259
(1)(1)(1)(1) (2)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(3) (4)(4)(4)(4) (5)(5)(5)(5) (6)(6)(6)(6)
खायरासोल कें दुयाकु री- 7 401 00 00 40
415 00 00 20
414 00 03 02
402 00 00 20
403 00 03 11
372/646 00 03 50
372 00 05 60
134 00 01 14
135 00 01 63
136 00 03 46
137 00 00 79
140 00 02 46
139 00 00 88
111/642 00 02 35
112 00 00 25
113 00 00 20
108 00 02 46
109 00 02 09
103 00 02 76
89 00 06 25
90 00 04 22
91 00 02 16
92 00 03 03
87 00 02 75
[फा.सं. आर----11025(11)/22/2018----ओआर-I/ई-27779]
शा(cid:3)तनु धर,,,, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S. O. 785.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of the India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S. O. No. 187 Dated 30th January, 2018 published on 3rd February, 2018 and vide S.O. No. 1760 dated 7th December 2018 published on 15th December, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems Project" for the transportation of Crude Oil in Birbhum District in the state of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 2nd July 2018.
3260 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P&MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
| District : Birbhum State : West Bengal | |||||
| Police Station | Name of Mouza | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Udaipur - 111 139 00 12 94
105 00 05 49
107 00 02 76
111 00 07 25
108 00 00 20
110 00 01 33
109 00 02 64
Bolpur Chandanpur - 110 3112 00 05 49
3113 00 00 35
3111 00 03 32
3110 00 02 21
2985 00 00 20
3109 00 01 03
2986 00 00 29
3012 00 00 70
3014 00 01 61
3013 00 01 10
3017 00 03 16
3018 00 03 79
3021 00 07 39
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3261
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Chandanpur - 110 3048 00 02 78
3049 00 01 14
3050 00 01 95
3061 00 00 26
3052 00 02 94
3054 00 03 25
3056 00 01 97
3055 00 00 98
2632 00 00 73
2339 00 02 56
2338 00 00 57
2337 00 00 36
2329 00 00 20
2328 00 04 50
2235 00 08 96
2233 00 00 20
2236 00 00 62
2134 00 01 12
2217 00 02 28
2216 00 01 85
2215 00 03 09
2212 00 02 83
2208 00 01 65
2204 00 02 38
2205 00 00 43
2203 00 02 66
2202 00 01 99
2201 00 01 11
1232 00 00 57
1216 00 00 50
1215 00 00 31
1217 00 01 18
1218 00 00 82
1219 00 01 31
1210/3349 00 00 22
1220 00 00 92
1207 00 04 66
3262 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Chandanpur - 110 1197 00 02 40
1209/3212 00 00 33
3218 00 14 01
1196 00 03 06
1192 00 02 35
1117/3146 00 02 34
1117 00 05 07
1116 00 02 50
1115 00 00 57
1111 00 04 62
1114 00 01 59
1113 00 00 20
1112 00 00 20
3348 00 01 85
3347 00 01 54
3346 00 01 86
3277 00 00 37
875 00 02 10
874 00 02 39
900 00 02 99
872 00 01 43
871 00 00 77
870 00 01 16
899 00 02 15
854 00 03 83
791 00 03 72
790 00 00 20
788 00 01 56
787 00 04 09
414 00 01 44
768 00 00 21
769 00 00 53
770 00 00 39
771 00 07 86
766 00 02 13
760 00 02 44
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3263
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Chandanpur - 110 761 00 01 75
762 00 00 44
660 00 05 06
652 00 04 31
626 00 02 22
651 00 02 13
649 00 04 37
650 00 01 44
645 00 06 33
511 00 12 07
532 00 03 98
534 00 03 88
556 00 00 48
543 00 00 99
542 00 02 15
541 00 02 15
541/884 00 02 77
540/885 00 02 65
540 00 00 21
336 00 02 38
331 00 01 00
334 00 04 56
315 00 08 34
294 00 04 04
297 00 03 15
296 00 00 20
300/3236 00 00 20
299 00 02 90
290 00 05 48
289 00 10 57
280 00 06 28
271 00 02 81
269 00 05 06
Bolpur Rasul Ganj Hat - 114 62 00 03 37
60 00 03 74
59 00 09 75
Bolpur Shibpur - 102 295 00 06 49
3264 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Shibpur - 102 290/542 00 01 01
288/541 00 00 32
545 00 01 24
288 00 01 18
544 00 00 57
41 00 01 03
41/569 00 05 44
572 00 01 13
569 00 05 44
Bolpur Uattar Radhanagar - 103 219 00 00 20
216 00 02 00
215 00 02 88
207 00 16 61
208 00 05 74
197 00 08 91
163 00 00 20
164 00 05 62
162 00 01 17
194 00 00 27
192 00 01 07
193 00 00 49
229 00 01 42
221 00 01 52
190 00 02 57
191 00 09 44
Bolpur Raipur - 109 10 00 11 63
Bolpur Mehidipur - 105 2357 00 00 35
2356 00 02 14
2341 00 02 08
2342 00 03 10
2346 00 08 40
2322 00 08 83
2315 00 00 66
2316 00 01 07
2317 00 01 61
2318 00 00 34
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3265
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Mehidipur - 105 2320 00 03 02
2296 00 03 11
2295 00 01 41
2293 00 00 90
3519 00 03 83
3513 00 00 92
3514 00 01 44
3515 00 00 36
2297 00 04 91
2270 00 03 42
2269 00 02 73
2267 00 05 48
2264 00 06 81
2141 00 06 84
2140 00 03 61
2138 00 01 64
2137 00 05 17
2109 00 07 02
2107 00 00 20
2110 00 01 80
2044 00 01 16
2043 00 06 79
2042 00 10 85
2036 00 04 05
2034 00 01 25
2431 00 07 49
1746 00 01 09
1747 00 00 66
1727 00 04 07
1729 00 02 06
1728 00 03 67
1725 00 06 00
1718 00 00 20
1719 00 09 16
1721 00 00 20
1720 00 00 63
3266 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Paschim Bahadurpur - 53 1598 00 00 20
1586 00 00 33
1585 00 03 08
1584 00 03 89
1583 00 02 72
1579 00 02 11
1577 00 09 17
1574 00 10 14
Bolpur Ruppur - 52 5445 00 01 11
5444 00 06 84
5443 00 01 13
5427 00 07 12
5428 00 04 54
5425 00 04 44
5424 00 11 28
5423 00 01 82
5419 00 01 36
5421 00 06 20
5420 00 00 23
8275 00 04 15
8270/8333 00 02 32
8278 00 02 29
8270 00 05 00
8269 00 04 56
8229 00 06 93
8230 00 05 95
8231 00 01 29
8232 00 00 61
8228 00 02 11
8235 00 03 48
8234 00 05 72
8192/8462 00 04 21
8126 00 00 41
8127 00 01 47
8128 00 00 85
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3267
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Ruppur - 52 8183 00 03 80
8137 00 01 71
8139 00 00 20
8141 00 04 70
8410 00 00 20
8478 00 03 45
8481 00 02 78
8482 00 03 52
7927 00 00 65
7913 00 08 45
7912 00 03 76
7911 00 00 20
7910 00 03 92
7860 00 01 79
7862 00 00 20
7858 00 01 75
7857 00 00 20
7852 00 00 70
7855 00 03 54
7856 00 01 41
7802 00 00 73
7819 00 00 89
7820 00 05 45
7821 00 03 27
7822 00 00 20
7828 00 03 10
7828/8454 00 05 28
7531 00 00 42
7610 00 02 99
7543 00 03 13
7544 00 00 23
7542 00 01 75
7538 00 01 70
7540/8448 00 03 07
7540 00 01 34
7430 00 00 88
3268 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Ruppur - 52 7426 00 04 34
7423 00 00 65
7422 00 01 61
7420 00 02 38
7427 00 02 00
7440 00 00 20
7130 00 02 74
7122 00 00 40
7123 00 05 65
7124 00 00 24
7110 00 02 46
7111 00 02 25
3076 00 02 76
7109 00 01 72
3074 00 02 04
3075 00 00 90
3073 00 02 51
3060 00 01 61
3061 00 02 11
3062 00 00 78
3063 00 01 14
3065 00 00 46
3064 00 02 21
3753 00 00 20
3052 00 02 38
3050 00 01 36
3051 00 03 06
3023 00 00 93
3025 00 00 20
3024/3777 00 01 28
2997 00 00 38
2996 00 02 28
2995 00 02 37
2993 00 00 20
2987 00 00 20
2992 00 01 99
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3269
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Ruppur - 52 2989 00 00 36
2985 00 00 28
2984 00 02 73
2983 00 00 34
2982 00 01 92
2951 00 17 04
2937 00 01 22
2953 00 00 34
2936 00 01 48
2934 00 00 68
2933 00 01 43
2928 00 09 24
2928/8375 00 03 32
506 00 04 76
2926 00 00 25
505 00 00 98
504 00 03 98
8369 00 05 64
429 00 06 38
430 00 08 49
438 00 02 00
439 00 00 27
440 00 00 47
441 00 04 30
442 00 07 90
443 00 02 35
445 00 00 78
446 00 00 20
411 00 04 80
387 00 06 34
383 00 00 36
384 00 00 83
352 00 04 08
385 00 01 44
388 00 03 79
351 00 04 05
3270 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Bolpur Ruppur - 52 343 00 07 06
346 00 01 52
344 00 02 15
345 00 00 90
335 00 01 78
332 00 05 87
331 00 04 43
330 00 04 43
326 00 01 86
290 00 05 75
291/8367 00 07 90
291 00 00 54
279 00 03 85
280 00 00 20
278 00 03 45
277 00 02 74
294/8372 00 08 57
293 00 00 73
294 00 10 03
Illambazar Kamarpara - 131 110 00 00 45
109 00 03 43
86 00 04 72
108 00 01 09
87 00 06 01
89 00 04 69
90 00 02 03
83 00 01 65
82 00 00 73
80 00 03 86
71 00 04 74
81 00 01 06
70 00 05 13
68 00 03 93
67 00 01 38
65 00 01 90
64 00 05 86
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3271
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Ramnagar - 130 1018 00 06 64
1017 00 01 75
1002 00 00 25
1016 00 00 20
1015 00 02 31
1013 00 02 43
1003 00 02 19
935 00 04 80
936 00 10 30
934 00 02 45
939 00 00 69
941 00 04 96
942 00 02 21
943 00 01 25
944 00 07 51
945 00 02 37
916 00 03 87
915 00 00 49
904 00 05 76
Illambazar Purba Narayanpur - 114 1033 00 07 76
1037 00 05 90
1039 00 02 95
1040 00 04 29
1022 00 11 71
1020 00 01 70
1021 00 01 31
1019 00 02 90
1018 00 03 30
1016 00 04 16
1016/1101 00 04 54
1015 00 04 83
1014 00 02 88
756 00 05 98
752 00 12 88
732 00 04 06
733 00 02 98
3272 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Purba Narayanpur - 114 714 00 06 24
713 00 03 71
712 00 03 84
669 00 03 66
668 00 03 82
667 00 03 95
494/1114 00 03 91
673 00 02 83
1007/1126 00 01 17
494/1112 00 01 80
494/1111 00 00 82
494 00 09 48
491/1150 00 00 47
492 00 01 85
480 00 05 81
481 00 03 13
482 00 02 18
479 00 06 05
483 00 00 20
485/1159 00 00 24
485/1156 00 00 67
479/1157 00 00 52
485 00 03 01
478 00 00 20
479/1105 00 00 20
471 00 10 07
472 00 07 01
473 00 05 52
474 00 02 21
474/1085 00 07 43
474/1079 00 13 26
Illambazar Matikona - 115 1151 00 02 56
1042 00 02 25
1040 00 07 49
1003 00 05 53
1002 00 01 29
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3273
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Matikona - 115 994 00 03 34
993 00 00 37
992 00 01 81
990 00 01 75
989 00 02 33
980 00 02 14
979 00 01 06
187/1663 00 04 49
186 00 02 96
187/1664 00 03 51
188 00 08 87
189 00 03 05
168 00 03 24
169 00 05 57
170 00 04 58
134 00 00 36
143 00 05 03
135 00 00 20
137 00 03 33
140 00 05 29
138 00 02 25
139 00 01 19
120 00 04 39
121 00 01 82
6 00 05 68
1 00 00 87
5 00 06 81
4 00 02 74
3 00 04 28
2 00 00 20
10 00 05 54
Illambazar Goltikuri - 110 2076 00 02 05
2075 00 04 84
2074 00 00 20
2073 00 04 99
2067 00 04 23
Illambazar Panch Tentule - 108 387 00 02 52 3274 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Panch Tentule - 108 388 00 00 29
389 00 03 68
381 00 00 64
382 00 01 40
497 00 01 65
495 00 04 75
496 00 01 91
359 00 00 88
360 00 00 40
370 00 03 33
369 00 03 95
363 00 05 50
252 00 03 66
251 00 00 33
247 00 03 54
254 00 00 30
246 00 05 42
245 00 00 22
244 00 03 54
240 00 00 20
241 00 03 70
230 00 03 26
Illambazar Kayra - 107 2353 00 03 20
2353/3349 00 03 08
2371 00 00 20
2354 00 04 78
2355 00 00 20
2367 00 04 60
2366 00 02 83
2356 00 03 04
2323 00 03 02
2322 00 00 61
2324 00 01 38
2320 00 03 42
2324/3346 00 00 43
2318 00 02 50
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3275
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Kayra - 107 2156 00 04 83
2300 00 00 20
2146 00 01 33
2147 00 02 42
2148 00 02 70
2142 00 01 88
2149 00 01 13
2150 00 05 57
2134 00 10 81
2425 00 00 85
2426 00 00 95
2430 00 02 61
2431 00 03 58
2429 00 02 30
2432 00 03 61
2435 00 02 09
2434 00 02 24
2125 00 00 29
2437/3209 00 05 43
1471 00 02 86
1472 00 02 57
1476 00 00 20
1473 00 03 12
1474 00 00 36
1475 00 00 47
1487 00 00 38
1454/1991 00 03 73
1490 00 00 53
1454 00 00 66
1453 00 08 23
1452 00 02 24
1424 00 00 20
1425 00 04 40
1426 00 01 71
1429 00 00 61
1427 00 00 51
3276 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Kayra - 107 1433 00 02 06
1436 00 00 20
Illambazar Pachiara - 106 2040 00 00 78
2042 00 00 20
2041 00 03 41
2044 00 01 01
2056 00 05 09
2055 00 01 20
2054 00 02 51
2052 00 00 89
2061 00 00 20
2053 00 02 53
2051 00 00 30
2050 00 02 74
2024 00 05 18
2019 00 03 35
2007 00 05 50
2020 00 00 20
2006 00 02 95
2002 00 00 22
2003 00 01 84
2001 00 03 07
1987 00 02 77
1988 00 01 86
1986 00 01 70
1499 00 00 41
1978 00 00 20
1979 00 03 96
1977 00 03 45
1976 00 05 30
1963 00 00 98
1975 00 04 48
1975/2286 00 01 44
1973 00 00 20
1974 00 06 40
1970 00 03 30
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3277
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Pachiara - 106 1968 00 01 46
1870 00 00 82
1871 00 07 29
1868 00 06 07
1865 00 05 36
1864 00 01 10
1863 00 01 08
1866 00 00 20
1595 00 07 70
1596 00 00 93
1598 00 00 21
1597 00 13 03
1624/2318 00 03 06
1624/2319 00 09 25
1845 00 13 04
1650 00 07 60
1651 00 03 91
1655 00 02 66
1653 00 01 04
1654 00 03 26
1656 00 00 84
Illambazar Paikuni - 105 1738 00 04 14
1737 00 02 56
1735 00 02 91
1739 00 00 53
1734 00 02 72
1740 00 00 20
1741 00 01 50
1726 00 02 47
1725 00 03 23
1724 00 02 27
1704 00 00 65
1270 00 10 20
1269 00 10 33
1271 00 01 75
1278 00 03 01
3278 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Paikuni - 105 1184/1838 00 03 16
1285 00 01 57
1283 00 00 20
1284 00 00 36
1292 00 00 20
1288 00 02 11
1290 00 00 34
1291 00 02 34
1297 00 03 47
1295 00 00 20
1296 00 00 20
1298 00 03 01
1299 00 02 36
1300 00 00 20
1107 00 02 33
1110 00 01 00
1108 00 00 80
1111 00 01 82
350 00 01 01
1001 00 02 54
1003 00 02 18
1002 00 02 61
999 00 03 41
938 00 00 75
939 00 03 86
940 00 03 21
941 00 02 05
944 00 02 03
946 00 01 36
947 00 02 20
948 00 01 07
949 00 00 66
950 00 03 77
954 00 01 06
953 00 01 54
956 00 02 80
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3279
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Paikuni - 105 958 00 01 27
886 00 03 21
959 00 03 02
960/1909 00 01 60
885 00 00 20
Illambazar Nripatigram - 43 1274 00 03 99
1275 00 07 02
1276 00 00 45
1277 00 06 34
1254 00 03 85
1278 00 04 28
1253 00 01 59
1279 00 03 15
1311 00 05 02
1314 00 07 37
1320 00 07 38
1321 00 04 00
1333 00 01 61
1332 00 00 23
1331 00 02 11
1330/1830 00 01 86
1330 00 03 08
1335 00 01 24
1336 00 02 10
1334 00 00 20
855 00 05 52
854 00 05 17
Illambazar Gopinathpur - 44 3965 00 05 66
3963 00 02 81
3964 00 00 65
3962 00 01 79
3961 00 01 12
3951 00 03 68
3950 00 03 49
3943 00 02 23
3280 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Gopinathpur - 44 3948 00 04 60
3882 00 03 36
3916 00 05 81
3915 00 03 61
3892 00 05 29
3894 00 04 58
3901 00 03 61
3902 00 05 94
3868 00 03 40
3867 00 02 64
3866 00 00 81
3863 00 05 93
3859 00 04 98
3860 00 01 42
3840 00 04 01
3841 00 03 27
3839 00 04 63
3838 00 02 32
3836 00 02 79
3592 00 00 31
3679 00 05 84
3665 00 05 59
3664 00 02 45
3682 00 02 76
3678/4060 00 00 56
3685 00 00 99
3684 00 05 41
3688 00 04 13
Illambazar Rakona - 45 625 00 02 33
626 00 02 50
627 00 00 20
629/988 00 04 00
579 00 00 20
580 00 07 06
578/956 00 05 22
571 00 04 18
572 00 03 33
573 00 03 33
561 00 02 94
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3281
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Rakona - 45 545 00 03 96
547 00 00 20
546 00 02 28
548/918 00 02 27
689 00 02 90
694 00 00 53
688 00 01 73
696 00 00 81
690 00 03 95
692 00 00 44
692/955 00 00 52
691 00 01 43
854 00 00 20
868 00 04 80
867 00 01 35
865 00 00 98
866 00 02 75
883 00 02 67
884 00 03 80
885 00 03 49
Illambazar Dhrampur - 46 1926 00 04 00
1927 00 02 21
1929 00 03 37
1930 00 04 45
1933 00 04 73
1890 00 04 70
1892 00 00 20
1891 00 00 46
1584 00 01 18
1795 00 01 34
1795/2088 00 00 72
1796 00 01 47
1793 00 06 28
1797/2535 00 02 62
1798 00 01 76
1791 00 00 85
3282 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Dhrampur - 46 1694 00 01 83
1693 00 01 63
1688 00 04 38
1687 00 00 43
1686 00 00 70
1680 00 00 20
1679 00 00 20
1633 00 08 27
1623/2529 00 01 63
1640 00 02 30
1639 00 02 85
1638 00 01 32
1637 00 01 16
1636 00 05 12
1625/2528 00 05 65
1629 00 03 58
1627 00 01 86
Illambazar Sunut - 47 572 00 01 41
573 00 01 49
574 00 01 97
569 00 00 71
567 00 03 96
566 00 02 08
562 00 24 07
565 00 01 56
560 00 04 65
527 00 00 70
528 00 00 95
529 00 01 50
526 00 01 70
533 00 01 34
534 00 04 75
519 00 00 61
518 00 01 55
535 00 01 24
421 00 00 35
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3283
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Sunut - 47 227 00 02 35
228 00 02 61
229 00 00 35
222 00 03 18
260 00 03 52
261 00 00 82
262 00 02 29
263 00 00 97
265 00 02 07
264 00 00 88
267 00 00 26
266 00 03 70
271 00 05 80
183/1101 00 01 00
274 00 00 94
182 00 02 38
181 00 02 43
277 00 03 69
171 00 00 20
170 00 01 92
169 00 00 85
167 00 02 93
111 00 06 11
112 00 00 20
110 00 00 20
115 00 03 20
116 00 04 60
119 00 11 48
123 00 00 70
122 00 06 60
121 00 04 31
32 00 03 88
31 00 03 10
30 00 00 20
29 00 02 23
17 00 04 43
3284 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Sunut - 47 2 00 01 01
6 00 05 72
Illambazar Salka - 48 1291 00 05 79
1297 00 01 34
1296 00 02 65
1300 00 02 13
1295 00 07 32
1293 00 02 21
1294 00 01 87
1266 00 03 10
1228 00 00 20
1265 00 02 51
1264/1389 00 03 23
1234/1386 00 02 35
1235 00 03 18
1236 00 05 51
1237 00 02 96
1239 00 06 50
1243 00 02 33
1206 00 02 80
1166 00 06 00
1167 00 03 81
1168 00 01 26
1169 00 03 93
1171 00 02 65
1172 00 03 02
1173 00 03 33
1174 00 04 92
1175 00 03 71
674 00 04 43
675 00 03 35
676 00 02 51
677 00 01 88
662 00 00 49
661 00 03 49
659 00 03 23
657 00 02 64
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3285
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Illambazar Salka - 48 652 00 00 49
642 00 02 71
643 00 01 80
638 00 05 80
641 00 04 77
702 00 01 83
703 00 00 37
564 00 03 71
640 00 03 41
639 00 00 42
566 00 02 74
563 00 03 12
568/1402 00 08 99
568 00 00 40
613 00 04 34
615 00 02 46
617 00 03 72
Dubrajpur Khagra - 210 316 00 00 62
315 00 03 84
314 00 04 55
313 00 01 20
312 00 01 92
311 00 03 85
310 00 00 77
307 00 01 20
308/424 00 00 20
345 00 05 79
258/366 00 02 17
256 00 04 92
110 00 04 37
341 00 05 95
111 00 01 50
115 00 01 30
114 00 04 52
105 00 14 19
118 00 03 75
3286 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Khagra - 210 74/417 00 00 33
90 00 00 62
88 00 03 79
87 00 08 29
86 00 03 06
85 00 00 20
35 00 04 33
31 00 09 08
33 00 00 22
32 00 03 04
17 00 05 14
19 00 00 31
18 00 02 31
20/355 00 04 33
1 00 01 04
Dubrajpur Paduma - 211 2125 00 05 52
2121 00 10 90
2120 00 08 57
2119 00 06 44
Dubrajpur Bodhgram - 208 936 00 01 02
993 00 00 55
992 00 04 06
997 00 07 13
985 00 03 46
984 00 04 88
983 00 00 53
982 00 03 78
978 00 05 08
979 00 00 20
980 00 04 39
960 00 06 27
959 00 02 76
958 00 03 43
952 00 00 20
954 00 04 27
954/1470 00 02 63
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3287
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Bodhgram - 208 873 00 02 96
875 00 06 91
877 00 02 09
876 00 05 32
878 00 02 82
852 00 01 92
839 00 00 70
840 00 07 13
841 00 04 52
827 00 01 71
826 00 02 45
824 00 00 20
825 00 04 06
Dubrajpur Kota - 158 1605 00 06 96
1589 00 06 01
1588 00 06 90
1587 00 01 84
Dubrajpur Bhaluka - 207 277 00 07 66
232 00 07 29
231 00 04 87
227 00 08 46
224 00 00 89
225 00 00 20
87 00 00 51
86 00 02 50
91 00 03 29
85 00 00 98
83 00 00 20
81 00 04 90
94 00 01 44
95 00 03 41
99 00 04 47
98 00 03 50
37 00 00 22
36 00 04 27
29 00 00 27
3288 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Bhaluka - 207 33 00 01 20
Dubrajpur Dakshin Chandipur - 160 274 00 01 57
273 00 06 88
682 00 03 50
681 00 07 49
269 00 08 69
Dubrajpur Birori - 164 835 00 01 15
815 00 08 51
816 00 02 31
813 00 04 32
658 00 02 72
659 00 01 39
656 00 02 64
655 00 01 58
663 00 00 99
665 00 04 66
653 00 01 74
647 00 00 20
646 00 01 26
645 00 07 34
473 00 07 11
492 00 01 56
504 00 02 08
503 00 02 29
494 00 00 20
495 00 01 74
502 00 00 20
496 00 03 23
491 00 00 90
490 00 04 06
489 00 01 07
477 00 00 91
407 00 00 27
408/903 00 00 86
406 00 02 86
405/902 00 03 02
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3289
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Birori - 164 404 00 00 76
402 00 00 20
397 00 01 87
396 00 03 94
888 00 00 36
449 00 01 78
448 00 00 34
450 00 03 30
383/844 00 06 59
383 00 02 19
382/929 00 03 14
386 00 04 23
Dubrajpur Rengna - 163 2465 00 00 20
2459 00 04 08
2458 00 03 96
2450 00 05 24
2451 00 03 42
2449 00 03 40
2370 00 02 93
2369/2582 00 01 48
2369 00 08 22
2366 00 05 33
2380 00 13 67
2381 00 01 90
2382 00 01 23
2378 00 00 20
2385 00 06 55
2387 00 05 60
2395 00 03 24
2386 00 00 31
2396 00 02 66
2397 00 02 47
2398 00 04 19
2400 00 04 60
961 00 02 28
963 00 00 20
3290 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Rengna - 163 833 00 00 89
834 00 04 24
835 00 00 20
836 00 02 82
843 00 00 81
844 00 00 20
842 00 03 27
841 00 01 42
840 00 00 44
839 00 00 56
853 00 00 59
788 00 06 37
787 00 01 62
786 00 02 96
783 00 00 38
782 00 02 17
781 00 06 03
778 00 01 01
547 00 01 24
548 00 00 61
543 00 00 20
544 00 05 40
546 00 00 82
539 00 02 47
523 00 00 43
537 00 00 47
538 00 03 18
532 00 02 68
531 00 05 09
530 00 00 20
526 00 01 90
529 00 04 30
528 00 01 43
215 00 01 94
334/1093 00 04 64
338/1092 00 03 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3291
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Rengna - 163 336 00 04 71
1153 00 01 70
315 00 01 63
312 00 02 94
313 00 00 47
309 00 01 72
306 00 00 29
305 00 08 25
278 00 03 80
280 00 00 20
279 00 02 59
274 00 02 03
273 00 04 53
282 00 01 62
283 00 02 08
284/1140 00 01 00
284 00 01 84
285/1141 00 00 20
286 00 03 03
287 00 00 84
9 00 06 54
8 00 06 22
6 00 00 42
Dubrajpur Dakshin Gopalpur - 150 239 00 12 14
14 00 00 20
237/318 00 04 61
Dubrajpur Pachiara - 168 3428 00 03 21
3346 00 05 24
3427 00 03 79
3426 00 00 64
3389/3532 00 00 20
3390 00 10 60
3391 00 01 23
3393 00 00 43
3397 00 01 83
3396 00 00 84
3292 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Pachiara - 168 3369 00 01 27
2678 00 03 24
2673 00 01 33
2672 00 00 20
2679 00 05 57
2709 00 00 65
2708 00 03 21
2705 00 03 12
2682 00 04 25
2683 00 01 79
2700 00 04 40
2686 00 00 20
2694 00 00 20
2696 00 00 91
2697 00 02 84
2698 00 00 74
2692 00 02 76
2691 00 00 24
2742 00 01 86
2743 00 03 73
2132 00 00 80
2766 00 03 68
2126 00 04 00
2125 00 04 48
2088 00 02 36
2089 00 02 53
2092 00 00 20
2093 00 02 67
2094 00 00 47
2095 00 00 20
2096 00 02 33
2098 00 00 20
2097 00 01 47
2068 00 04 84
2826 00 02 22
2827 00 00 21
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3293
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Pachiara - 168 1766 00 00 20
1767 00 01 24
1817 00 00 20
1769 00 01 84
1816 00 02 83
1814 00 01 71
1815 00 02 41
1778 00 00 78
1803 00 02 66
1801 00 02 42
1852 00 01 26
1800 00 00 20
1857 00 03 34
1856 00 00 20
1860 00 02 12
1861 00 01 10
1859 00 00 36
1862 00 02 06
1889 00 00 20
1888 00 02 85
1887 00 02 27
1886 00 01 92
1876 00 03 16
1875 00 00 20
1877 00 01 85
1878 00 02 40
1879 00 00 80
1743 00 00 94
1640 00 00 54
1637 00 00 20
1635 00 00 35
1636 00 02 29
1634 00 01 67
1621 00 00 20
1632 00 01 80
1630 00 00 96
3294 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Pachiara - 168 691 00 01 56
695 00 00 20
692 00 03 35
694 00 00 20
685 00 00 20
682 00 00 71
684 00 03 32
683 00 02 18
665 00 00 20
665/1588 00 01 44
658 00 01 55
663 00 01 11
662 00 01 61
538 00 05 89
537 00 00 20
539 00 05 25
522 00 00 20
521/1579 00 02 00
520 00 04 78
519 00 00 83
515 00 03 69
213/1524 00 04 74
Dubrajpur Chandrapur - 169 1939 00 16 38
1851 00 01 91
1850 00 04 37
1849 00 05 53
1858 00 00 20
1859 00 00 66
1860 00 01 69
1861 00 01 41
1862 00 01 12
1863 00 01 48
1864 00 02 76
1830 00 00 20
1823 00 01 00
1865 00 02 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3295
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Chandrapur - 169 1813 00 03 95
1812 00 02 48
1811 00 00 22
1808 00 00 63
1809 00 02 35
1810 00 00 51
1807 00 00 29
1803 00 02 62
1806 00 02 59
1804 00 02 28
1441/1955 00 00 20
1441 00 04 38
1438 00 03 57
1437 00 01 57
1435 00 00 20
1433 00 01 71
1127 00 01 03
1453 00 00 48
1454 00 02 23
1455 00 01 15
1458 00 00 59
1457 00 02 13
1460 00 00 20
1461 00 03 10
1463 00 02 46
1462 00 00 20
1467 00 02 20
1468 00 02 54
1105 00 00 20
1498 00 04 86
1096 00 00 20
1097 00 00 58
1087 00 02 43
1083 00 00 20
1081 00 02 96
1082 00 01 13
3296 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Chandrapur - 169 1064/2004 00 01 90
1065 00 01 17
1070 00 01 04
1067 00 00 20
1068 00 01 05
1069 00 01 88
1046 00 02 07
1045 00 00 76
1044 00 02 40
1039 00 01 08
1958 00 00 73
1040 00 01 36
1038 00 00 20
998 00 04 26
697 00 00 21
695 00 00 67
696 00 00 20
694 00 01 61
693 00 00 20
665 00 04 55
658 00 04 36
664 00 00 20
660 00 00 20
662 00 00 31
661 00 01 85
663 00 00 64
605 00 00 32
603 00 01 62
602 00 00 98
589 00 00 64
590 00 00 74
591 00 03 00
592 00 02 42
588 00 02 53
577 00 00 29
587 00 01 08
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3297
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Chandrapur - 169 580 00 00 20
585 00 00 20
583 00 01 24
582 00 01 58
559 00 01 61
Dubrajpur Hetampur - 143 217 00 00 39
218 00 00 87
232 00 00 91
227 00 00 20
233 00 00 20
231 00 01 44
230 00 01 77
234 00 00 20
244 00 01 96
245 00 00 25
224 00 02 26
249 00 01 83
248 00 00 22
252 00 00 93
259 00 02 22
258 00 00 20
253 00 02 97
254 00 00 93
197 00 01 51
279 00 00 45
198 00 00 20
195 00 00 81
196 00 01 62
280 00 04 12
175 00 06 60
282 00 00 23
172 00 01 74
170 00 00 20
171 00 02 13
160 00 02 77
150 00 02 33
3298 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Hetampur - 143 155 00 00 20
137 00 04 79
136 00 03 74
135 00 01 92
159 00 00 24
Dubrajpur Mohanpur - 142 601 00 06 20
605/650 00 01 19
602/649 00 02 93
602 00 05 27
600 00 00 36
599 00 02 28
598 00 05 91
370 00 00 75
369 00 02 12
372 00 00 27
371 00 00 20
367 00 07 52
368 00 03 83
355 00 03 20
352 00 00 42
353 00 07 74
353/416 00 00 55
343 00 01 45
311 00 00 20
343/426 00 01 62
390 00 07 78
65 00 03 31
68 00 05 55
72 00 01 30
74 00 03 95
75 00 00 46
77 00 00 20
58 00 04 76
55 00 00 24
79 00 02 69
52 00 02 55
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3299
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Mohanpur - 142 90 00 01 28
2 00 10 06
1 00 01 32
Dubrajpur Satkenduri - 104 1978 00 04 65
1986 00 00 59
1979 00 00 51
1982 00 00 46
1983 00 00 26
2267 00 00 74
2006 00 01 67
2266 00 00 43
1939 00 00 20
1941 00 00 20
1939 00 01 47
1940 00 00 46
1938 00 02 31
1937 00 01 97
1935 00 06 18
1933 00 02 89
1934 00 03 37
Dubrajpur Islampur - 140 853 00 02 69
858 00 00 66
854 00 06 86
855 00 02 85
846 00 03 10
847 00 00 20
844 00 00 36
842 00 01 54
843 00 02 26
827 00 00 36
828 00 01 79
829 00 04 36
830 00 00 51
831 00 13 11
181 00 09 43
Dubrajpur Beleshuli - 139 755 00 14 93
3300 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Beleshuli - 139 673 00 01 38
674 00 03 27
543 00 03 77
545 00 00 20
542 00 04 17
541 00 00 20
520 00 03 42
540 00 00 26
522 00 00 52
523 00 01 40
524 00 01 12
526 00 01 38
527 00 01 71
529 00 00 46
525 00 01 19
528 00 01 97
472 00 00 20
504 00 02 22
503 00 00 76
503/804 00 01 70
503/803 00 00 80
475 00 03 99
474 00 00 38
488 00 00 57
487 00 00 68
486 00 00 91
485 00 01 07
484 00 00 20
483 00 01 44
336 00 02 62
337 00 00 20
336/749 00 00 83
421 00 03 48
360 00 00 44
361 00 03 51
376 00 00 69
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3301
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Beleshuli - 139 368 00 01 58
371 00 00 24
370 00 01 09
391 00 00 29
394/780 00 01 53
394 00 00 21
397 00 14 26
392 00 00 53
398 00 00 62
782 00 05 29
781 00 04 96
74 00 00 26
Dubrajpur Asdulla - 106 844 00 21 56
843 00 00 70
842 00 13 73
711 00 00 85
710 00 05 24
712 00 02 96
709 00 00 65
713 00 03 89
707 00 04 61
705 00 04 47
675 00 04 78
593 00 00 39
594 00 00 95
592 00 00 58
590 00 03 65
589 00 01 73
586 00 00 90
587 00 03 91
585 00 02 36
684 00 07 78
683 00 00 20
685 00 00 20
581 00 03 30
686 00 00 20
3302 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Asdulla - 106 690 00 06 12
691 00 00 73
Dubrajpur Nunedi - 110 133 00 00 96
132 00 05 08
141 00 02 09
130 00 02 67
142 00 03 66
129 00 05 91
143 00 05 01
151 00 04 26
152 00 02 89
49 00 00 99
50 00 00 20
52 00 03 37
48 00 00 20
45 00 01 50
53 00 00 84
55 00 02 38
54/169 00 00 70
54 00 00 87
17 00 10 74
24 00 00 49
23 00 04 93
22 00 00 20
21 00 02 88
15 00 00 20
16 00 05 09
Dubrajpur Panditpur - 111 1509 00 04 30
1508 00 00 20
1643 00 05 98
1644 00 00 52
1645 00 10 17
1651 00 01 35
1323 00 00 94
1337 00 04 67
1367 00 00 54
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3303
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Panditpur - 111 1364 00 00 97
1362/1706 00 02 30
1363 00 00 20
1372 00 01 09
1362 00 01 94
1362/1707 00 01 89
1132 00 01 04
1629 00 04 15
1690 00 03 48
1133 00 00 20
1145 00 07 56
1146 00 00 20
1139 00 00 78
1144 00 00 95
1143 00 00 48
1141 00 02 71
1142 00 03 48
1021 00 13 13
1025 00 00 20
1020 00 00 73
983 00 07 52
982 00 00 25
987 00 01 33
981 00 02 17
270 00 01 29
269 00 02 20
267 00 00 30
59 00 01 70
57 00 01 33
56 00 00 70
54 00 03 63
675 00 01 25
974 00 01 40
583 00 00 20
667/1717 00 00 88
Dubrajpur Jangaldubrajpur - 138 74 00 01 23
Dubrajpur Rupsimuli - 112 688 00 00 203304 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Rupsimuli - 112 690 00 00 56
695 00 01 53
696 00 02 19
697 00 12 59
697/1516 00 02 74
701 00 01 22
700 00 00 96
706 00 04 33
705 00 00 20
708 00 00 42
636 00 04 09
635 00 04 30
634 00 02 07
432 00 00 20
631 00 01 21
615 00 00 20
614 00 02 98
618 00 00 20
613 00 03 10
442 00 08 61
592 00 00 57
462 00 08 16
463 00 03 12
461 00 00 20
466 00 03 76
465 00 02 14
467 00 00 94
468 00 04 77
469 00 02 78
498 00 00 66
499 00 01 08
495 00 02 55
494 00 01 26
493 00 00 58
796 00 01 46
509 00 05 50
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3305
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Rupsimuli - 112 521 00 07 92
520 00 01 22
527 00 04 19
71 00 00 41
62 00 01 75
529 00 01 77
Dubrajpur Kaythanpur - 24 360 00 02 61
361 00 01 21
362 00 02 35
378 00 04 69
365 00 00 20
377 00 02 91
376 00 02 00
371 00 01 28
370 00 01 98
329 00 04 07
330 00 01 89
334 00 00 78
326 00 03 78
327 00 01 66
323 00 01 56
324 00 00 20
283 00 05 97
279 00 01 95
284 00 02 93
269 00 00 56
272 00 00 22
270 00 01 23
271 00 00 20
268 00 00 36
263 00 00 48
253 00 00 99
254 00 00 41
256 00 00 20
252 00 06 40
250 00 01 91
Dubrajpur Hosenabad - 25 261 00 03 67
3306 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Hosenabad - 25 202 00 02 87
199 00 00 87
201 00 01 41
198 00 02 18
197 00 04 04
195 00 02 00
196 00 02 76
183 00 03 57
181 00 01 34
180 00 01 61
179 00 01 49
163 00 18 81
164 00 01 45
Dubrajpur Panchpakhuria - 26 468 00 00 90
470 00 01 68
330 00 03 03
331 00 07 47
327 00 09 22
315 00 05 08
313 00 03 47
317 00 03 61
274 00 01 36
320 00 00 79
319 00 02 58
272 00 00 79
273 00 06 47
Dubrajpur Harulia - 27 430 00 01 17
420 00 01 03
419 00 00 20
421 00 05 01
427 00 01 81
424 00 00 21
429 00 00 20
426 00 01 68
425 00 00 92
410 00 03 50
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3307
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Harulia - 27 409 00 02 52
440 00 00 30
371 00 00 64
372 00 02 82
369 00 02 63
352 00 02 73
350 00 03 40
351 00 02 19
349 00 01 88
467 00 01 01
453 00 00 55
236 00 08 04
232 00 04 73
231 00 03 84
125 00 10 44
Dubrajpur Balijuri - 21 604 00 03 16
221/2808 00 01 05
221/642 00 05 21
615 00 02 31
221/2810 00 00 53
616 00 01 36
221/2811 00 00 28
618 00 00 89
617 00 00 20
619 00 00 53
620 00 01 61
621 00 00 20
587 00 00 45
622 00 02 62
624 00 00 47
581 00 02 55
578 00 02 71
576 00 00 20
577 00 00 29
2772 00 01 39
1 00 24 35
Dubrajpur Gopalnagar - 30 1197 00 00 573308 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Gopalnagar - 30 1196 00 59 09
1191 00 01 63
1190 00 17 05
1500 00 02 56
Dubrajpur Agoa - 7 544 00 02 98
545 00 05 48
555 00 06 00
517 00 02 42
518 00 00 20
514 00 12 13
515 00 01 93
516 00 00 20
509 00 07 53
508 00 03 66
507 00 04 86
494 00 06 55
649 00 07 73
489 00 06 53
488 00 02 40
646 00 08 82
486 00 03 02
464 00 12 44
465 00 03 56
466 00 04 14
467 00 07 39
468 00 01 17
466 00 00 58
Dubrajpur Kuraljuri - 6 580 00 00 60
662 00 03 97
663 00 07 89
664 00 04 65
1095 00 01 55
1091 00 06 12
1089 00 00 20
1088 00 00 49
1085 00 02 05
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3309
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Kuraljuri - 6 1084 00 01 28
1083 00 03 32
1095/1173 00 00 26
1082 00 01 25
1081 00 01 55
1080 00 00 94
1079 00 00 98
1078 00 00 80
688 00 08 61
1056 00 00 39
1055 00 00 30
1054 00 00 27
1053 00 00 20
1139 00 12 77
690 00 04 11
691 00 06 99
700 00 01 48
1106 00 00 99
725 00 02 80
724 00 04 39
723 00 00 86
722 00 09 01
717 00 00 23
719 00 02 68
718 00 02 76
351 00 01 21
354 00 01 68
350 00 00 39
359 00 00 20
358 00 02 46
356 00 04 00
357 00 02 31
360 00 00 22
361 00 00 20
363 00 01 03
365 00 03 80
3310 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Kuraljuri - 6 376 00 00 85
375 00 00 68
374 00 01 25
373 00 00 88
372 00 01 55
411 00 00 61
413 00 03 63
412 00 01 88
371 00 01 89
323 00 00 21
417 00 09 82
416 00 04 48
419 00 00 20
428 00 00 20
427 00 04 22
423 00 00 55
425 00 01 83
426 00 02 71
91/1113 00 00 64
91 00 08 71
91/1114 00 00 20
96 00 09 06
114 00 03 69
115 00 01 01
113 00 00 20
97 00 02 26
101 00 00 29
102 00 03 61
100 00 00 54
103 00 01 52
104 00 02 17
87 00 01 09
58 00 01 03
57 00 01 84
56 00 02 70
65 00 01 91
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3311
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Kuraljuri - 6 44 00 01 25
47 00 00 38
45 00 01 29
14 00 00 20
46 00 09 09
15 00 10 26
16 00 00 23
Dubrajpur Kholakunri - 5 1026 00 02 24
1027 00 02 18
1028 00 00 20
1022 00 01 34
1024 00 00 64
1025 00 18 96
1033 00 03 71
1001 00 00 45
1000 00 04 15
999 00 03 55
998 00 02 28
997 00 04 49
995 00 00 63
996 00 08 31
298 00 12 06
286 00 01 77
288 00 02 74
289 00 01 05
290 00 07 82
260 00 02 05
259 00 01 52
241 00 04 77
240 00 01 28
236 00 07 25
235 00 02 86
199 00 02 36
200 00 01 48
201 00 02 47
202 00 02 89
3312 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Kholakunri - 5 220 00 04 35
222 00 00 46
219 00 02 16
218 00 02 20
216 00 00 20
217 00 01 11
65 00 00 47
43 00 00 20
42 00 04 74
49 00 08 39
32 00 01 51
33 00 01 38
31 00 00 32
3/1179 00 05 58
2 00 03 69
3 00 01 21
Dubrajpur Lakshminarayanpur - 4 684 00 1 22
311 00 01 87
215 00 01 65
310 00 04 28
Dubrajpur Punglapur - 3 964 00 00 58
963 00 00 23
962 00 00 39
961 00 00 50
960 00 08 58
523/1275 00 00 63
517 00 02 75
518 00 00 39
519 00 01 10
521/1295 00 00 20
499 00 04 30
497 00 00 20
516 00 01 30
508 00 01 08
501 00 01 47
500 00 02 51
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3313
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Punglapur - 3 488 00 03 92
487 00 01 43
478 00 00 85
480 00 00 20
479 00 00 80
475 00 02 01
477 00 00 30
453 00 00 66
474 00 00 20
447 00 00 98
181 00 00 61
446 00 01 30
437 00 01 83
436 00 02 47
440 00 00 20
422 00 01 67
423 00 00 76
424 00 00 78
426 00 01 61
427 00 01 13
417 00 00 25
411 00 02 00
410 00 02 38
408 00 01 07
412 00 00 28
413 00 00 55
371 00 01 08
407 00 00 53
372 00 02 19
373 00 02 03
273 00 05 10
242 00 00 20
274 00 01 53
275 00 01 06
271 00 03 89
268 00 07 39
3314 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Dubrajpur Punglapur - 3 259 00 00 37
245 00 05 94
249 00 03 16
Khayrasol Anandanagar - 12 1979 00 02 06
1978 00 00 65
1977 00 05 64
1976 00 00 74
1965 00 10 02
1972 00 10 86
498 00 06 40
493 00 07 14
499 00 00 20
492 00 01 68
502 00 03 16
283 00 00 23
488 00 01 73
487 00 00 84
486 00 00 78
284 00 02 23
287 00 08 21
285 00 04 19
286 00 03 51
288 00 00 78
289 00 00 82
295 00 02 16
294 00 05 11
302 00 12 42
303 00 00 20
304 00 01 16
307 00 03 03
305 00 03 28
308 00 04 24
312 00 00 22
37 00 01 85
36 00 02 22
35 00 03 04
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3315
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Khayrasol Anandanagar - 12 50 00 00 51
48 00 00 93
31 00 04 57
52 00 02 31
68 00 05 47
80 00 03 29
Khayrasol Budhpur - 11 375 00 05 06
376 00 05 82
377 00 01 74
378 00 03 60
391 00 05 15
392 00 03 56
389 00 07 53
410 00 00 20
409 00 01 65
408 00 00 94
407 00 01 13
412 00 03 22
413 00 00 60
627 00 00 94
414 00 02 49
620 00 02 90
621 00 00 20
616 00 02 06
617 00 07 48
575 00 00 40
573 00 00 20
1043 00 04 62
612 00 01 94
588 00 01 07
582 00 02 98
587 00 00 38
583 00 00 32
584 00 01 96
586 00 00 20
585 00 00 87
3316 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Khayrasol Budhpur - 11 788 00 01 52
790 00 02 21
797 00 00 20
791 00 01 82
792 00 01 92
793 00 00 20
794 00 04 66
69 00 00 27
Khayrasol Haripur - 10 1389 00 00 51
718 00 00 20
717 00 01 32
715/1342 00 00 50
716 00 01 22
714 00 00 96
712/1318 00 01 00
713 00 00 20
712 00 05 34
733/1253 00 00 20
733 00 00 45
755 00 01 03
754 00 02 57
752 00 01 69
767 00 02 71
769 00 00 36
768 00 00 33
770 00 02 12
771 00 02 48
773 00 00 20
772 00 01 41
783 00 02 87
784 00 00 20
802 00 03 15
802/1252 00 03 16
803 00 01 90
948 00 01 64
950 00 03 70
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3317
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Khayrasol Haripur - 10 957 00 00 86
960 00 00 67
956 00 01 09
955 00 00 95
561 00 06 56
1278 00 00 20
560 00 06 38
1388 00 00 28
963 00 00 20
559 00 00 57
558 00 02 09
557 00 00 95
542 00 00 27
Khayrasol Aliat - 8 1905 00 00 37
1563 00 03 18
1564 00 02 64
1562 00 02 32
1565 00 00 20
1561 00 06 46
1560 00 04 73
1559 00 03 22
1942 00 04 01
1548 00 02 19
1549 00 00 28
1547 00 00 73
1545 00 02 08
1546 00 00 69
1544 00 02 59
1543 00 01 23
1542 00 00 70
1540 00 02 63
1539 00 01 93
1312 00 01 72
1311 00 01 28
1310 00 00 79
1309 00 03 23
3318 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Khayrasol Aliat - 8 1304 00 01 31
1303 00 01 87
1301 00 00 20
1300 00 04 10
1348 00 01 13
1293 00 00 20
1291 00 04 35
1285 00 02 30
1287 00 00 62
1286 00 00 55
1288 00 00 20
Khayrasol Amlakuri - 9 490 00 00 20
424/1127 00 00 26
517 00 03 20
Khayrasol Kenduakuri - 7 578 00 01 58
579/657 00 02 10
579/658 00 00 20
577 00 02 52
576 00 02 39
575 00 02 53
574 00 03 78
573 00 00 38
571 00 00 20
544 00 02 12
543 00 00 40
545 00 01 48
551 00 01 43
550 00 00 62
552 00 00 99
539 00 03 13
528 00 00 21
553 00 05 08
517 00 02 89
518 00 01 54
502 00 03 49
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3319
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
493 00 04 09 485 00 00 47 627 00 04 40 479 00 01 71 626 00 00 20 324 00 01 95 323 00 05 23 329 00 01 59 330 00 01 54 460/650 00 00 73 331 00 01 40 393 00 04 11 394 00 04 25 417 00 00 20 396 00 02 53 397 00 00 27 416 00 03 50 401 00 00 40 415 00 00 20 413 00 01 22 414 00 03 02 402 00 00 20 403 00 03 11 372/646 00 03 50 372 00 05 60 134 00 01 14 135 00 01 63 136 00 03 46 137 00 00 79 140 00 02 46 139 00 00 88 111/642 00 02 35 112 00 00 25 113 00 00 203320 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
103 00 02 76 89 00 06 25 90 00 04 22 91 00 02 16 92 00 03 03 87 00 02 75
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, , , , 8 मई,,,, 2019
काकाकाका.आआआआ.786.—के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन (भूमि में उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन) अिधिनयम,,,, 1962 (1962 का 50) (जिसे इसमें इसके पश्चात उक्त अधिनियम कहा गया है) की धारा 3 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन जारी की गई भारत सरकार के पेट्रोलियम और प्राकृ तिक गैस मंत्रालय की अिधसूचना संख्या का.आ. 184, दिनांक 30 जनवरी 2018, भारत के राजपत्र दिनांक 3 फरवरी 2018, में प्रकाशित की गई थी,,,, तथा अधिसूचना संख्या का.आ. 1761, दिनांक 7 दिसम्बर 2018,,,, भारत के राजपत्र में दिनांक 15 दिसम्बर 2018 को प्रकाशित की गई थी । इन अधिसूचना से संल? अनुसूची में िविनBदष्ट भूमि में पDिम बंगाल राज्य में "हल्दिया----बरौनी पाइपलाइन सिस्टम्स परियोजना" िजला ब]र्मान में कJे तेल के परिवहन हेतु इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड द्वारा पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए उपयोग के अधिकार के अर्जन के अपने आशय की घोषणा की थी ।
और उक्त राजपत्र अधिसूचना की प्रतियाँ जनता को दिनांक 27 अक्तूबर 2018 तक उपलब्ध करा दी गई थी,,,,
और सक्षम प्राधिकारी ने उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) के अधीन के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार को रिपोर्ट दे दी है,,,,
और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार ने,,,, उक्त रिपोर्ट पर विचार करने के पDात और यह समाधान हो जाने पर कि उक्त भूमि पाइपलाइन बिछाने के लिए अपेक्षित है,,,, उसमें उपयोग के अिधकार का अर्जन करने का विनिDय किया है;;;;
अतः अब,,,, के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Xए यह घोषणा करती है की इस अधिसूचना से संल? अनुसूची में वििनBदष्ट भूमि में पाइपलाइन िबछाने के िलए उपयोग के अधिकार का अर्जन किया जाए;;;;
और के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 6 की उपधारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते Xए,,,, यह निदZश देती है कि उक्त भूमि में उपयोग के अिधकार इस घोषणा के प्रकाशन की दिनांक से के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार में निहित होने के बजाए,,,, सभी विल्लंगमो से मुक्त होकर इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड में निहित होगी;;;;
पेट्रोलियम और खनिज पाइपलाइन अिधिनयम,,,,1962 की धारा 10 के अधीन किसी भी क्षतिपू[त के लिए इंडियन ऑयल कॉपNरेशन लिमिटेड पूर्णतया उतरदाई होगा और पाइपलाइन से संबन्धित किसी भी मामले पर के न्(cid:12)ीय सरकार के वि\] कोई दावा या कानूनी कार्यवाही नह^ हो सके गी।
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3321अनुअनुअनुअनुसूसूसूसूचीचीचीची
| िजला : बर्मान बर्मान राज्य : प िम बंगाल िजला : | |||||
| थाना | मौज़ा का नाम | सव सव सव सव नम्बनम्बनम्बनम्बरररर | क्ष े त्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रक्षेत्रफलफलफलफल | ||
| ह ह े े ह ह क्टेयर े े | एयरएयरएयरएयर | वर्ग मीटर |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
रायना-II मिनयारी - 138 334 00 14 61
335 00 06 20
336 00 01 58
338 00 04 15
337 00 00 50
373 00 26 18
373/782 00 24 10
372 00 19 56
404 00 00 20
405 00 01 39
406 00 00 54
409 00 05 58
408 00 06 06
431 00 03 46
430 00 05 54
439 00 04 45
440 00 00 43
441 00 08 60
442 00 08 94
443 00 02 77
444 00 02 78
445 00 02 91
481 00 05 19
595 00 00 20
588 00 14 58
482 00 06 16
535 00 00 87
536 00 02 08
537/791 00 01 20
537 00 01 29
3322 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
502 00 07 07
507 00 04 54
504 00 01 09
506 00 01 83
508 00 01 16
509 00 02 52
510 00 02 43
रायना-॥ सांकोनारायणपुर - 139 2165 00 02 15
2167 00 02 78
2515 00 07 35
2173 00 03 98
2172 00 02 21
2171 00 00 42
2178 00 00 87
2176 00 02 27
2177 00 00 45
2175 00 08 56
2185 00 01 55
2186 00 00 73
2191 00 06 16
2188 00 00 90
2192 00 01 02
2190 00 02 87
2195 00 04 83
2194 00 00 79
2200 00 04 42
2199 00 00 31
2198 00 03 26
2203 00 01 15
2204 00 01 94
2205 00 02 74
2206 00 10 20
2081 00 02 96
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3323
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2072 00 03 43 2071 00 02 77 2055 00 04 89 2054 00 05 90 2051 00 02 00 2053 00 02 67 2052 00 00 96 1217 00 05 31 1216 00 04 25 1214 00 01 64 1220 00 08 49 1215 00 04 70 1221 00 06 09 1198 00 02 29 1195 00 04 08 1196 00 05 41 1194 00 01 58 1192 00 07 25 1190 00 03 42 1191 00 04 12 1188 00 11 27 1186 00 16 37 997 00 00 69 998 00 06 87 999 00 02 97 1000 00 00 20 1001 00 10 98 1002 00 01 20 1008 00 04 74 1009 00 02 05 1007 00 06 14 1010 00 00 91 1011 00 02 083324 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1019 00 03 33
1018 00 06 49
1025 00 03 84
1026 00 03 67
1024 00 00 20
1027 00 08 41
1028 00 00 68
1030 00 01 77
1031 00 00 50
1034 00 09 12
1035 00 01 53
1036 00 00 20
936 00 06 65
823 00 03 91
822/2889 00 03 51
822 00 00 63
822/2890 00 01 75
822/2891 00 05 07
816 00 01 61
816/2887 00 15 27
814 00 05 33
810 00 06 80
811 00 02 86
797 00 07 11
808 00 02 32
800 00 02 64
802 00 07 65
803 00 04 91
804 00 00 20
खन्डघोष कै यर- 96 34 00 01 11
33 00 02 95
खन्डघोष कामदेबपुर - 95 249 00 01 50
248 00 02 36
खन्डघोष गोपालपुर - 87 770 00 01 61[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3325
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
773 00 02 36
778 00 04 68
777 00 01 74
776 00 01 98
775 00 01 42
775/821 00 00 60
774/820 00 00 44
774 00 00 48
725 00 07 26
724 00 01 81
721 00 02 69
723 00 04 66
648 00 00 20
649 00 2 48
650 00 1 11
खन्डघोष संकरी - 70 1210 00 02 84
1194 00 00 95
1209 00 00 78
1199 00 00 52
1195 00 05 72
1196 00 01 74
846 00 01 30
845 00 02 93
851 00 05 44
852 00 06 93
855 00 04 72
857 00 01 18
858 00 01 43
856 00 00 35
862 00 01 89
859 00 00 20
861 00 00 32
863 00 02 63
3326 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
559 00 00 20 564 00 03 80 543 00 03 47 565 00 00 20 540 00 00 90 542 00 01 93 541 00 03 33 537 00 01 92 538 00 01 59 531 00 06 90 530 00 02 83 529 00 00 63 522 00 03 21 434 00 00 72 525 00 00 21 433 00 02 50 436 00 04 09 437 00 04 80 420 00 01 63 419 00 03 03 416 00 01 93 391 00 01 54 394 00 03 72 415 00 00 20 395 00 02 34 396 00 04 01 376 00 03 92 377 00 00 26 375 00 01 18 374 00 01 17 192 00 01 36 183 00 01 54 191 00 03 58[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3327
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
189 00 00 22
78 00 04 26
88 00 03 27
87 00 03 20
80 00 01 02
86 00 00 20
84 00 06 03
82 00 00 42
83 00 04 08
73 00 01 28
खन्डघोष पलाशडांगा- 60 421 00 06 73
422 00 00 20
419 00 02 54
418 00 03 30
417 00 00 97
416 00 03 54
405 00 02 03
406 00 00 53
404 00 01 70
365 00 01 22
366 00 01 69
388 00 00 24
387 00 02 36
384 00 00 20
386 00 00 74
385 00 05 07
375 00 00 20
376 00 02 29
310 00 00 20
309 00 00 89
308 00 01 33
306 00 03 69
305 00 00 20
3328 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
485 00 04 03
263 00 01 26
153 00 00 46
158 00 01 30
154 00 00 29
157 00 00 79
155 00 00 20
156 00 01 77
161 00 02 04
163 00 00 23
163/932 00 00 82
164/933 00 01 01
164 00 01 45
164/934 00 00 91
165 00 02 27
230 00 00 61
47 00 03 98
46/907 00 01 74
46 00 02 89
71 00 02 48
80/919 00 00 39
81 00 03 60
80 00 03 07
84 00 01 19
83 00 00 24
85/873 00 01 73
85 00 01 34
खन्डघोष वािनया - 59 630 00 00 82
633 00 00 45
183 00 05 36
186 00 01 21
182 00 00 44
185 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3329
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
191 00 00 51
190 00 02 10
192 00 01 07
193/662 00 00 26
193 00 00 42
194 00 00 60
195 00 00 42
196 00 00 57
202 00 04 48
201 00 00 52
199 00 01 15
200 00 03 68
206 00 04 66
209 00 05 15
214 00 07 38
213 00 00 25
215 00 04 17
101 00 00 20
100 00 03 94
99 00 05 03
52/675 00 00 20
99/679 00 05 60
53 00 03 52
95 00 02 52
94 00 04 17
90 00 02 71
91 00 00 27
78 00 03 89
76 00 00 23
79 00 02 80
80/650 00 00 20
75 00 08 13
74 00 01 01
खन्डघोष कृ ष्ननगर - 51 538 00 02 37
3330 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
535/2246 00 00 96
535 00 01 39
502 00 06 65
503 00 03 35
504 00 06 56
506 00 05 35
508 00 00 74
507 00 01 79
539 00 00 48
खन्डघोष सासंगा - 58 3247 00 02 73
3261 00 06 35
3262 00 04 71
3172 00 05 17
3167 00 01 80
3168 00 04 74
3171 00 00 20
3169 00 00 20
3170 00 07 08
3132 00 01 56
2375 00 01 46
2374 00 02 93
2381 00 00 20
2371 00 09 82
2402 00 04 27
2413 00 01 89
2347 00 07 37
2414 00 04 51
2415 00 02 55
2421 00 13 29
2416 00 02 53
2420 00 02 28
2280 00 02 42
2422 00 00 30
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3331
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2261 00 03 33 2262 00 03 43 2264 00 02 56 2263 00 01 93 2249 00 03 63 2248 00 01 36 232 00 01 60 231 00 02 46 233 00 03 55 236 00 00 20 234 00 00 20 235 00 02 10 237 00 00 20 222 00 00 94 221 00 01 15 220 00 00 93 218 00 00 32 219 00 01 55 217 00 01 10 249 00 01 35 250 00 00 33 248 00 00 81 251 00 01 88 247 00 00 29 252 00 03 02 199 00 04 44 198 00 01 68 200 00 02 73 196 00 02 35 194 00 00 47 195 00 03 78 81 00 00 20 83 00 03 383332 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
93 00 02 58
70 00 01 30
69 00 02 78
68 00 00 77
67 00 04 00
65 00 03 95
26 00 00 49
64 00 01 63
62 00 06 57
61 00 00 31
58 00 01 72
32 00 00 75
36 00 08 71
37 00 04 67
39 00 05 48
40 00 00 73
38 00 00 20
खन्डघोष नपाड़ा – 56 2463 00 01 00
2462 00 00 20
1535 00 01 90
1536 00 13 05
खन्डघोष मसीला - 57 767 00 07 69
769 00 00 20
763 00 00 90
745 00 06 49
744 00 02 99
743 00 00 20
731 00 03 17
734 00 00 96
735 00 00 61
732 00 00 20
733 00 02 19
736 00 00 62
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3333
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
719 00 00 20
725 00 01 52
722 00 01 57
721 00 01 80
705 00 00 20
693 00 04 62
694 00 03 07
695 00 00 37
688 00 02 68
603 00 00 20
608 00 02 75
467 00 03 03
466 00 04 72
465 00 00 29
425 00 00 29
464 00 02 84
463 00 00 20
462 00 00 71
426 00 03 40
427 00 00 40
461 00 02 50
459 00 02 24
458 00 04 74
452 00 01 47
450/1225 00 01 98
448 00 03 19
449 00 01 51
गलसी - II कोनेरपुर - 126 2930 00 02 16
2907/3029 00 03 89
2907 00 02 21
2910 00 04 33
2911 00 02 51
2912 00 04 90
3334 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3113 00 20 11 3117 00 10 82 3116 00 20 37 2934 00 23 09 2935 00 06 06 1311 00 20 87 1195 00 05 02 1200 00 03 28 1199 00 00 20 1189 00 11 49 1188 00 14 31 980 00 34 85 1088 00 02 29 933 00 00 20 909 00 09 38 856 00 02 08 1099 00 03 46 771 00 04 75 769 00 00 20 750 00 00 73 750/969 00 00 85 325 00 00 20 770 00 01 02 465 00 12 19 749 00 00 43 748 00 00 71 747 00 00 20 328 00 05 91 329/1070 00 01 74 329 00 02 81 460 00 00 48 331 00 05 01 332 00 08 91[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3335
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
335 00 00 37
337 00 07 65
336 00 03 52
338 00 01 64
339 00 08 58
345 00 08 85
362 00 00 20
361 00 00 20
360 00 03 23
359 00 03 25
354 00 07 36
355 00 03 29
गलसी - II बेलbाम- 117 2389 00 02 86
2378 00 03 58
2311 00 02 57
2229 00 07 24
2165 00 04 98
2162 00 03 88
3766 00 08 67
3765 00 03 95
3763 00 00 34
3764 00 06 42
3753 00 00 20
3752 00 04 22
3751 00 04 06
3750 00 06 82
3749 00 01 20
3689 00 03 04
3693/4105 00 02 09
3693 00 01 22
3692 00 00 23
3698 00 01 99
3694 00 00 75
3336 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3663 00 02 61 3662 00 02 15 3595 00 02 65 3715 00 00 56 3594 00 01 62 3593 00 01 14 3716 00 01 42 3592/4329 00 01 45 3572 00 10 20 3573/4323 00 01 05 3574/4325 00 01 86 3574 00 03 59 3567 00 01 10 3580 00 00 42 3579 00 00 20 3512 00 02 67 3511 00 01 04 3510 00 01 64 3504 00 03 44 3509 00 00 20 3508 00 02 55 3507 00 03 35 3506 00 02 62 3401 00 03 67 3404 00 00 32 3403 00 03 02 3412 00 01 32 3413 00 01 27 3417 00 00 20 3415 00 02 06 3416 00 01 05 3427 00 03 57 3423 00 04 61[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3337
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3166 00 02 45
3176 00 02 12
3177 00 06 19
3183 00 03 06
3182 00 04 36
3194 00 02 40
3196 00 02 20
3195 00 01 28
3193 00 07 60
गलसी - II सितनंदी - 114 5434 00 05 82
5433 00 00 20
5428/5964 00 01 87
5435 00 00 41
5436 00 06 61
5428 00 03 85
5423 00 11 48
5352 00 07 06
5353 00 06 61
5350 00 00 89
5354 00 00 95
5349 00 06 92
5348 00 02 16
5347 00 02 24
5346 00 01 86
5341 00 06 61
4245 00 01 53
4243 00 02 68
4244 00 02 43
4242 00 00 20
4196 00 14 78
4234 00 04 00
4208 00 03 34
4218 00 00 97
3338 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4216 00 06 37 4154 00 12 03 4347 00 02 14 4345 00 02 18 4135 00 02 05 3949 00 01 79 3970 00 04 17 3968 00 03 43 3967 00 00 20 3969 00 00 44 3964 00 01 24 3973 00 02 07 3962 00 00 20 3963 00 04 07 3974 00 02 41 4005 00 01 62 4002 00 05 19 4003 00 00 20 4000 00 00 20 4001 00 02 07 3998 00 01 75 4037 00 01 84 4038 00 01 50 4042 00 02 96 4044 00 00 20 4043 00 03 92 4046 00 03 79 4063 00 00 20 4052 00 02 41 4050 00 00 20 4051 00 01 95 2186/4417 00 00 77 2163 00 01 93[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3339
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2166 00 02 36 2167 00 00 22 2168 00 01 83 2169 00 01 04 2170 00 00 65 2171 00 03 20 2159 00 00 66 1930 00 02 54 2149 00 03 93 2148 00 02 32 1939 00 01 18 2144 00 01 72 2143 00 02 81 2141 00 01 49 2142 00 00 44 2142/4325 00 01 19 2096 00 00 81 1947/4367 00 00 60 1947 00 03 08 2094 00 05 21 1953 00 02 72 2065 00 01 35 1962 00 00 20 2064 00 01 40 1963 00 00 85 2063 00 00 43 1964 00 01 28 1965 00 01 92 2052 00 03 13 2053/6172 00 00 20 2051 00 01 18 2050 00 02 09 2049 00 04 583340 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2044/6170 00 04 34
2043 00 00 48
2016 00 02 15
6239 00 02 17
2294/6225 00 00 73
2019 00 04 42
2018 00 04 82
1792 00 05 40
1793 00 05 38
1795 00 00 68
1723 00 05 01
1722 00 05 36
1722/6118 00 04 35
1721 00 02 07
1718 00 00 20
1717 00 17 47
1713 00 00 89
गलसी - II हिgा - 112 3632 00 04 19
3633 00 00 57
3631 00 02 83
3629 00 00 72
3621 00 10 90
3619 00 00 89
3618 00 01 63
3614/4510 00 02 41
3603 00 01 16
3588 00 01 77
3587 00 02 25
3584 00 04 63
3591 00 01 80
3592 00 02 28
3593 00 02 97
3531 00 07 26
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3341
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3092 00 02 63 3093 00 06 93 3094 00 00 94 3095 00 02 27 3101 00 03 21 3102 00 01 17 3099 00 01 62 3104 00 01 44 3103 00 00 67 3108 00 01 27 3036 00 00 20 3031 00 04 09 3030 00 00 83 3033 00 00 20 3032 00 00 40 3027 00 03 15 3020 00 01 64 3021 00 01 55 3013 00 03 65 2889 00 00 77 3007 00 00 44 3012 00 00 20 2892 00 00 32 3011 00 00 20 2909 00 08 43 2910 00 06 04 2910/4472 00 03 93 3002 00 03 18 3001 00 04 24 3000 00 01 24 2999 00 00 20 2982 00 03 57 2980 00 07 103342 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2975 00 01 88
2868 00 00 98
2966 00 01 10
2969 00 00 20
2965 00 02 16
2964 00 02 79
2954 00 05 04
गलसी - II चन्ना - 111 4318 00 05 27
4317/4557 00 07 03
4322 00 01 24
4316 00 02 49
4310 00 02 14
4309 00 01 88
4311 00 00 87
4306 00 00 20
4308 00 02 09
4307 00 01 64
4312 00 01 18
4252 00 03 58
4351 00 00 31
4250 00 01 48
4248 00 01 64
4249 00 00 20
4245 00 00 51
4246 00 02 57
4243 00 02 26
4241 00 00 20
2750 00 00 88
2706 00 01 90
2705/2812 00 04 77
2705/2811 00 02 49
2704 00 00 72
2705 00 06 23
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3343
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2566 00 02 43 2551 00 05 08 2545 00 02 58 2544 00 02 85 2527 00 02 60 2528 00 03 78 2537 00 02 87 2529 00 01 25 2532 00 01 57 2531 00 04 42 2514 00 03 22 2515 00 00 44 2513 00 00 78 2535 00 00 20 2512 00 05 07 2421 00 02 21 2429 00 04 65 2428 00 03 23 2427 00 00 22 2430 00 02 09 2393 00 01 95 2431 00 03 82 2392 00 04 27 2390 00 02 10 2384 00 03 90 2383 00 00 28 2385 00 03 98 2376 00 01 14 2375 00 13 57 2243 00 07 46 2242 00 00 82 2241 00 00 57 2214 00 01 303344 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2223 00 02 15 2224 00 03 83 2222 00 01 55 2221 00 00 65 2225 00 03 14 2835 00 01 59 2228 00 04 61 2227 00 01 55 2226 00 02 56 2068/2830 00 00 81 131 00 00 20 122/422 00 00 87 122 00 05 08 124 00 05 20 123 00 01 94 118/423 00 01 91 118 00 00 59 117 00 01 09 116 00 03 72 114 00 03 42 115 00 02 24 100 00 09 97 94 00 08 96 92 00 02 69 93 00 02 32 89 00 04 89 88 00 00 20 90 00 03 23 31 00 02 44 32 00 06 80 38 00 05 69 37 00 08 29 22 00 00 90[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3345
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
गलसी - II संकराई - 110 226 00 02 40
227 00 02 40
229 00 01 20
228 00 00 77
224 00 14 40
1262 00 02 33
ब]र्मान - I नाला – 20 3754 00 02 24
3753 00 04 46
3752 00 03 11
3706 00 00 87
3709 00 00 30
3708 00 02 58
3704 00 07 00
3714 00 03 07
3715/4919 00 06 96
3715/4833 00 00 42
3715 00 02 30
3701/4842 00 04 61
3701/4871 00 06 29
2505/5055 00 02 75
2505 00 11 85
2504 00 02 27
2506 00 01 72
2500 00 04 29
2498 00 06 38
2490 00 03 95
2491 00 00 60
2480/5341 00 00 97
2480 00 05 26
2482 00 02 79
2481 00 03 32
2471 00 01 51
2465 00 06 41
3346 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2409 00 00 74 2407 00 02 56 2406 00 14 52 2397 00 03 18 2396 00 05 14 2395 00 06 07 1131 00 05 44 1132 00 01 89 1130 00 00 84 1128 00 06 06 1125 00 04 35 1124 00 09 50 1164 00 00 90 1178 00 00 50 1123 00 00 93 1179 00 01 09 1120 00 04 84 1119 00 04 60 1118 00 01 39 1116 00 06 42 1115 00 09 87 1114 00 07 47 1112 00 02 38 1113 00 04 19 81 00 04 18 82 00 02 20 83 00 02 78 84 00 04 84 86 00 00 90 85 00 05 77 100 00 03 62 101 00 04 65 102 00 06 29[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3347
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
63 00 09 77
37 00 06 13
17 00 04 64
38 00 02 88
16 00 02 01
5140 00 13 85
15 00 11 60
14 00 00 98
11 00 11 40
5114 00 02 63
5115 00 00 29
5116 00 00 20
औसbाम - I करंजी - 147 1623 00 01 00
1620 00 00 20
1614 00 09 05
1613 00 03 32
1612 00 03 21
1611 00 02 24
700 00 00 92
1151 00 02 76
1150 00 02 99
1153 00 00 20
1154 00 03 28
1144 00 00 20
1148 00 08 64
1155 00 04 24
1147 00 01 36
1145 00 01 11
1143 00 02 11
1142 00 00 20
1093 00 01 80
1094 00 08 06
1097 00 04 41
3348 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1100 00 00 91
1072 00 01 29
1071 00 00 76
1073 00 04 07
1069 00 00 99
1074 00 00 40
1066 00 01 56
1067 00 01 39
1064 00 03 89
1065 00 00 20
1063 00 03 12
1061 00 00 20
औसbाम - I भादा - 146 3014 00 00 44
3075 00 00 77
2924 00 01 61
2927 00 00 75
2926 00 00 75
2925 00 01 21
2928 00 01 30
2929 00 02 11
2929/3239 00 01 14
2937 00 00 20
2935 00 02 28
2934 00 00 20
2946 00 01 67
2947 00 00 22
2948 00 02 03
2945 00 00 92
2949 00 01 28
2950 00 00 20
2951 00 00 37
2902 00 01 96
2868 00 02 73
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3349
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2864 00 00 20 2735 00 04 31 2734 00 00 38 2738 00 01 48 2742 00 02 25 2743 00 01 73 2744 00 00 32 2739 00 00 20 2747 00 03 51 2746 00 00 33 2754 00 00 20 2758 00 00 79 2757 00 02 94 2756 00 03 05 2639 00 01 17 2640 00 00 20 2638 00 01 53 2636 00 00 20 2637 00 01 68 2643 00 00 44 2644 00 02 36 2645 00 00 20 2595 00 00 57 2594 00 00 95 2593 00 01 18 2586 00 00 68 2592 00 00 78 2591 00 01 53 2590 00 00 88 2589 00 01 33 2575 00 00 37 2600 00 00 20 2570 00 02 233350 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2572 00 00 20 2565 00 00 64 2564/3237 00 03 03 2564 00 01 02 1017 00 00 20 1016 00 04 42 1010 00 00 21 1015 00 00 63 1014 00 03 58 872 00 01 37 876 00 02 90 874 00 00 59 875 00 01 90 879 00 04 15 852 00 05 84 851 00 01 09 853 00 00 22 823 00 04 08 824 00 02 48 826 00 00 20 825 00 01 28 818 00 00 20 817 00 01 03 816 00 02 07 815 00 00 31 300 00 01 58 808 00 00 20 813 00 04 67 810 00 00 28 811 00 02 14 812/1074 00 00 20 812 00 00 92 423 00 00 81[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3351
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
422 00 04 43
333 00 01 18
421 00 02 37
416 00 00 93
417 00 02 23
418 00 00 71
414 00 00 20
413 00 07 69
404 00 00 41
403 00 01 53
402 00 02 52
401 00 01 09
400 00 02 03
399 00 02 93
376 00 01 98
378 00 03 52
379 00 00 46
380 00 00 77
365 00 00 20
औसbाम - I बेलारी - 148 4422 00 04 41
4062 00 00 77
3843/4962 00 00 57
3843 00 06 23
3839 00 00 43
4963 00 00 20
3840 00 04 60
3832 00 02 39
3847 00 03 68
3846 00 00 24
3851 00 00 20
3850 00 03 80
3849 00 02 43
3870 00 04 88
3352 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3889 00 01 62 3894 00 00 20 3885 00 00 75 3886 00 00 20 3895 00 03 57 3896/4493 00 03 32 3932 00 00 20 3882 00 00 20 3931 00 01 09 3930 00 04 73 3926 00 03 76 3929 00 00 20 3927 00 00 20 3924 00 03 03 3917 00 01 72 3938 00 00 64 3966 00 04 66 3967 00 02 51 3968 00 01 05 3969 00 00 60 5047 00 01 47 3968/4987 00 00 20 3971 00 02 60 3972 00 02 90 3973/4992 00 01 88 3815 00 01 12 3814 00 01 62 3816 00 00 95 3717 00 05 55 3719 00 07 46 3721 00 05 55 3720 00 02 17 3726 00 04 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3353
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3729 00 03 86
3730 00 01 14
3706 00 02 19
3705 00 00 20
औसbाम - I बेलbाम - 116 8182 00 05 25
8183 00 10 06
8185 00 01 89
8186 00 00 22
8177 00 07 64
8280 00 02 46
8176 00 00 70
8175/8272 00 01 90
8090 00 03 77
8091 00 05 28
8092 00 00 20
8089 00 00 20
8093 00 02 07
8094 00 01 77
8095 00 00 20
8098 00 03 72
8096 00 00 30
8097 00 03 45
7913 00 00 42
8100 00 00 20
7912 00 04 16
8101 00 00 30
7911 00 02 82
7910 00 00 20
7907 00 03 50
7906 00 00 63
7908 00 02 99
7905 00 01 70
7887 00 01 44
3354 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
7892 00 06 74 7848 00 00 38 7846 00 10 07 7845 00 00 20 3440 00 00 54 7842 00 00 52 3426 00 01 74 3427 00 01 09 3425 00 00 20 3438 00 00 20 3428 00 02 95 3429 00 01 76 3430 00 00 38 3431 00 04 08 3433 00 01 70 3432 00 00 20 3467 00 06 42 3470 00 00 20 2931 00 00 43 3471 00 01 74 3472 00 00 26 3475 00 01 34 3474 00 00 89 4507 00 01 69 3483 00 00 93 4506 00 02 81 4036 00 00 92 3482 00 02 93 4034 00 00 20 3486 00 03 50 4032 00 00 78 4031 00 06 65 4009 00 03 63[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3355
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4027 00 02 99 4023 00 01 95 4022 00 03 60 4020 00 04 10 3952 00 03 76 3944 00 00 80 3945 00 01 77 3943 00 02 82 3942 00 02 55 3941 00 02 37 3915 00 01 31 3916 00 02 59 3914 00 07 39 3848 00 02 32 3849 00 01 35 3862 00 01 45 3852 00 05 22 3854 00 03 74 3803 00 01 62 3802 00 00 86 3807 00 00 41 3801 00 03 17 3800 00 02 89 8427 00 00 26 4063 00 02 00 4090 00 13 81 4091 00 01 60 4092 00 00 84 4093 00 00 20 4781 00 02 96 4097 00 06 99 4100 00 00 20 3635 00 02 383356 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2344 00 03 12 2347 00 01 49 2343 00 00 41 2330 00 02 89 2337 00 06 06 2334 00 02 69 2332 00 01 43 1792 00 06 47 1778 00 00 20 1779 00 00 88 1791 00 00 20 1780 00 07 73 1772 00 00 20 1781 00 00 34 1771/1957 00 04 96 1771 00 00 46 1560 00 04 23 1559 00 00 92 1566 00 01 84 1565 00 00 20 1554 00 04 45 1553 00 00 40 1552 00 07 02 1550 00 03 10 1549 00 02 46 1548/1900 00 00 97 1455 00 00 30 1456 00 03 09 1457 00 05 29 1458 00 00 20 1450 00 01 69 1459 00 01 01 1460 00 03 11[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3357
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1463 00 01 15
1464 00 02 59
1466 00 01 20
1467 00 03 03
1221 00 02 58
1223 00 00 68
1222 00 02 01
1205 00 05 89
1204 00 02 98
1209 00 03 96
1202 00 00 20
1210 00 02 84
1201 00 00 50
1196 00 06 03
1195 00 05 03
1076 00 04 46
1075 00 03 60
1079 00 00 73
1073 00 00 20
1069 00 01 66
1070 00 05 26
1071 00 03 92
1067 00 00 20
1066 00 04 35
1059 00 07 00
औसbाम - I नओदा - 115 1421 00 02 35
1218 00 02 41
1217 00 02 77
1216 00 02 30
1195 00 02 09
1192 00 00 39
1193 00 01 50
1191 00 04 16
3358 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2244 00 01 09 2245 00 00 71 2248 00 00 33 2242 00 02 52 2241 00 03 31 2239 00 04 23 2194 00 02 76 2195 00 02 80 2197 00 05 69 2152 00 00 20 2155 00 00 20 2151 00 03 21 2150 00 04 32 2211 00 07 50 2149 00 00 47 2213 00 08 80 1499 00 02 46 1500 00 09 49 1505 00 05 33 1509 00 10 02 1524/2585 00 00 91 1524 00 01 17 1525 00 00 83 1523 00 01 80 1528 00 02 45 1529 00 04 32 1537 00 01 57 1538 00 01 92 1534 00 03 12 1546 00 05 82 1550 00 02 68 1551 00 00 20 1552 00 01 36[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3359
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1226 00 01 00
1227 00 04 92
1229 00 03 47
1230 00 00 97
1231 00 02 36
1178 00 02 81
1162 00 00 20
1161 00 01 88
1165/2611 00 05 89
1166 00 03 05
1174 00 01 55
1169 00 03 38
1170 00 03 11
1173 00 04 35
52/902 00 01 72
51 00 01 48
47 00 03 01
46 00 07 03
40 00 01 71
41 00 01 20
39 00 00 37
37 00 03 47
38 00 02 43
33 00 09 44
32 00 02 90
28 00 00 57
31 00 02 62
29 00 03 21
30 00 04 34
13 00 02 18
12 00 06 48
14 00 02 15
औसbाम - I द्वारियापुर - 118 7776 00 00 24
3360 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
7767 00 02 48
7766 00 3 88
7765 00 02 54
7680 00 02 29
7761 00 00 81
7760 00 06 38
7681 00 03 21
7759 00 00 99
7682 00 00 41
7683 00 01 73
औसbाम - I गुसकरा- 110 3586 00 02 33
3587 00 02 24
3589 00 06 81
3582 00 01 22
3594 00 00 31
3591 00 00 20
3593 00 03 40
3592 00 03 22
3600 00 01 44
3605 00 02 18
3606 00 00 20
3604 00 01 57
3602 00 00 55
3603 00 03 62
3563 00 01 74
3562 00 02 84
3561 00 00 35
3528 00 04 14
3529 00 08 90
3520 00 02 14
3518 00 01 59
3517 00 04 82
3515 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3361
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3486 00 00 28
3481 00 02 87
3482 00 03 24
3483 00 01 67
3476 00 02 71
3473 00 00 20
3472 00 02 86
3372 00 00 80
3368 00 06 60
3367 00 03 94
3351 00 00 20
3352 00 01 78
3349 00 04 10
3348 00 02 26
3347 00 00 20
3346 00 03 37
3303 00 01 25
3161 00 02 70
3160 00 01 63
3159 00 01 69
3157 00 00 55
औसbाम - I सोमाईपुर - 72 4002 00 00 34
3581 00 00 20
3573 00 11 11
3574 00 02 90
3575 00 13 34
3576 00 00 70
3019 00 03 75
3015 00 02 46
3016 00 03 41
3017 00 04 05
3014 00 05 63
2849 00 02 53
3362 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2840 00 04 87 2839 00 02 02 3075 00 05 79 3021 00 00 59 2805 00 03 69 2806 00 01 98 2807 00 07 50 2799 00 00 95 2798 00 04 21 2810 00 00 26 2779 00 01 49 2778 00 04 45 2777 00 03 78 2774 00 01 08 2737 00 03 50 2727 00 02 41 2736 00 02 28 2735 00 05 23 2695/3090 00 00 20 2695/3067 00 14 21 2695/3066 00 00 20 2695/3068 00 04 56 2695 00 13 99 2698 00 05 31 2699 00 03 17 2700 00 00 58 2696 00 03 73 2697 00 05 79 19 00 00 20 20 00 00 53 2672 00 02 92 18 00 08 68 36 00 03 12[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3363
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3 00 02 12
2 00 00 20
1 00 02 86
औसbाम - I बाबूरबाँध- 71 1640/1797 00 00 20
1640/1798 00 01 29
1622/1799 00 02 52
1611/1802 00 02 41
1611/1801 00 07 69
1611 00 05 72
1610 00 03 47
1615 00 12 08
1583 00 12 53
1576 00 11 39
1535 00 03 53
1536 00 06 04
1539 00 01 41
1540 00 01 48
1542 00 01 44
1543 00 02 41
1551 00 04 99
1552 00 04 91
790 00 00 20
791 00 05 40
828 00 10 69
821 00 01 49
822 00 00 48
823 00 00 57
820 00 01 43
815 00 03 96
814 00 00 87
712 00 00 45
812 00 03 60
244 00 01 92
3364 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1598 00 02 83
1597 00 06 67
1562 00 08 74
1464 00 00 91
1465 00 03 35
1467 00 02 83
1468 00 05 52
1526 00 03 93
1525 00 01 28
1472 00 01 06
1524 00 01 46
1523 00 01 97
1486 00 03 58
1487 00 00 27
1488 00 03 79
1489 00 00 20
1303 00 01 10
1304 00 02 05
1302 00 03 24
1301 00 05 87
1312 00 04 09
1290 00 02 10
1313 00 00 42
1285 00 01 71
1286 00 05 15
1277 00 01 24
1276 00 02 84
1273 00 04 48
1275 00 00 20
औसbाम - I मल्लिकपुर - 68 710 00 06 01
709 00 00 20
707 00 04 22
706 00 04 47
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3365
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
677 00 00 34
638 00 01 49
640 00 05 20
639 00 00 20
642 00 02 85
633 00 08 97
633/834 00 00 50
629 00 04 93
628 00 00 20
625 00 09 11
626 00 03 55
595 00 01 89
औसbाम - I बेरन्डा- 74 858 00 01 22
856 00 00 31
846 00 00 29
847 00 00 20
849 00 01 35
844 00 03 69
841 00 00 20
842 00 01 19
843 00 01 26
815 00 00 28
806 00 04 80
805 00 00 23
798 00 01 61
804 00 05 94
1437 00 13 58
औसbाम - I iिकृ ष्नपुर - 77 382 00 06 60
384 00 04 50
383 00 01 42
398 00 13 53
354 00 06 66
348 00 08 24
3366 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
318 00 05 50
317 00 04 95
319 00 01 31
310 00 04 44
311 00 00 20
309 00 05 91
औसbाम – ।। चन्(cid:12)द्विप - 78 679/818 00 14 90
677 00 06 69
622 00 04 18
676 00 00 20
624 00 10 74
626 00 03 98
632 00 08 41
637 00 04 12
636 00 02 15
640 00 08 73
641 00 03 46
597 00 08 31
596/810 00 01 50
595 00 06 84
औसbाम – ।। बक्सीबाद पोbाम - 83 2118 00 04 57
2120 00 05 36
2365 00 00 20
2394 00 03 80
2115 00 01 76
2114 00 00 77
2113 00 07 58
2107 00 06 37
2108 00 00 20
2109 00 03 98
2030 00 01 57
2029 00 02 25
2031 00 02 75
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3367
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2024 00 00 20
2018 00 08 76
2019 00 00 20
2009 00 03 57
2002 00 03 28
2001 00 02 91
1885 00 04 75
1883 00 02 86
1882 00 03 32
1881 00 05 51
1880 00 02 86
1868 00 03 42
1867 00 04 45
1853 00 00 20
1852 00 02 46
1850 00 02 56
1851 00 00 23
1844 00 01 76
1843 00 00 20
औसbाम – ।। रेओरा - 82 1282/1337 00 03 39
1280 00 01 07
1282 00 03 12
1283 00 01 07
1276 00 01 83
1270 00 04 44
1271 00 04 56
1268 00 00 20
1262 00 03 54
1261 00 01 74
1260 00 03 73
1259 00 02 36
1211 00 00 45
1220 00 04 10
3368 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1237 00 00 20 1223 00 02 47 1233 00 02 18 1232 00 02 21 1230 00 00 25 1231 00 03 01 1138 00 02 70 1137 00 00 59 1136 00 01 65 1131 00 07 93 1132 00 00 91 1129 00 03 07 1130 00 03 72 1128 00 00 20 1127 00 03 68 205 00 00 65 206 00 00 63 1126 00 03 15 823 00 00 92 859 00 01 46 216 00 01 34 821 00 02 24 820 00 01 30 819 00 01 63 224 00 05 94 225 00 02 56 226 00 03 08 232 00 00 37 231 00 02 33 233 00 00 20 243 00 00 90 242 00 01 43 244 00 00 55[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3369
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
252 00 00 77
255 00 02 02
254 00 01 08
266 00 01 38
267 00 01 98
50 00 03 76
51 00 00 46
45 00 04 15
44 00 01 57
34 00 03 88
35 00 00 44
7 00 04 80
5 00 13 70
4 00 00 61
औसbाम – ।I नृस^हपुर- 79 468 00 06 61
467 00 06 65
466 00 03 31
465 00 00 60
464 00 05 18
462 00 00 20
485 00 00 20
463 00 03 28
458 00 04 75
456 00 00 57
453 00 03 67
454 00 00 20
443 00 02 73
452 00 00 20
444 00 01 37
442 00 01 36
441 00 03 10
199 00 01 10
198 00 00 20
3370 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
208 00 01 67
58 00 02 17
216 00 00 20
175 00 10 80
65 00 03 52
69 00 00 20
68 00 05 32
73 00 00 56
47 00 16 91
75 00 00 32
48 00 01 80
38 00 05 01
20 00 03 61
19 00 01 92
19/1302 00 00 20
18 00 03 16
17 00 04 94
16 00 01 22
5 00 01 60
6 00 05 02 औसbाम – ।। िबलशांडा- 81 257 00 03 33
254 00 01 59
253 00 05 46
252 00 01 44
90/194 00 02 67
90 00 00 21
91 00 00 52
92 00 02 37
95 00 02 68
94 00 06 02
104 00 04 58
105 00 02 39
106 00 00 43 [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3371
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
65 00 02 57
50 00 04 14
51 00 02 23
64 00 00 27
54 00 03 20
52 00 11 00
53 00 00 22
25 00 06 02
11 00 02 65
6/1066 00 00 64
6/1064 00 00 16
6/1062 00 01 49
6/1067 00 01 21
2/1068 00 11 28
2/1069 00 04 02
2/1070 00 09 34
2/1097 00 03 07
1 00 10 49 भातर ओरbाम - 11 13401 00 00 20
13402 00 03 35
13403 00 01 92
13404 00 00 46
13405 00 03 42
13406 00 04 10
13400 00 00 20
13407 00 03 43
13408 00 02 07
13410 00 04 39
13411 00 03 10
13389 00 03 15
13391 00 07 61
13860 00 04 61
13374 00 00 20 3372 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
13182 00 02 06 1316 00 03 51 1315 00 02 22 1313 00 03 19 1306 00 10 03 1301 00 00 66 1155 00 12 33 1156 00 06 10 1157 00 00 20 1158 00 01 94 1149 00 01 49 1151 00 01 20 1050/17620 00 00 97 17621 00 01 51 17622 00 01 62 1143 00 01 15 17624 00 02 03 17625 00 01 91 17626 00 02 65 1138 00 00 39 1137 00 02 11 1139 00 02 18 1136 00 01 93 1131 00 00 20 1125 00 03 97 1129 00 08 29 1107 00 02 23 1106 00 02 21 1105 00 02 74 1061 00 00 20 1330 00 00 44 1071 00 12 40 1007 00 12 97[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3373
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
973 00 04 57 974 00 03 45 983 00 01 30 982 00 08 53 955 00 10 17 952 00 00 44 953 00 01 39 954 00 04 29 769 00 01 92 770 00 06 19 15656 00 02 29 619 00 13 46 620 00 05 80 611 00 02 34 609 00 02 83 607 00 01 89 608 00 03 95 602 00 06 90 603 00 00 71 601 00 01 20 634 00 02 51 635 00 09 52 638 00 00 20 636 00 01 70 637 00 00 25 640 00 00 59 642 00 01 65 326 00 01 65 649 00 00 37 325 00 07 38 246/15689 00 03 47 246/15688 00 03 78 246/15687 00 03 833374 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
247 00 06 96 246/895 00 00 20 246 00 01 79 248 00 06 73 249 00 03 71 250 00 08 30 251 00 04 14 252 00 06 89 197 00 02 07 196 00 01 66 198 00 06 12 187 00 04 17 94 00 03 37 186 00 02 98 95 00 03 05 96 00 01 32 97 00 02 95 77 00 04 84 75 00 02 20 74 00 03 01 70 00 00 47 69 00 02 79 65 00 02 92 67 00 00 66 68 00 00 20 63 00 00 81 61/859 00 06 06
[फा. सं. आर-11025(11)22/2018-ओआर-I/ई-27779]
शान्तनु धर, अवर सिचव
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S. O. 786 .—Whereas by the notification of the Government of the India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas S. O. No. 184 Dated 30th January, 2018 published on 3rd February, 2018 and vide S.O. No. 1761 dated 7th December 2018 published on 15th December, 2018 issued under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), published in the Gazette of India, the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying "Haldia-Barauni Pipeline Systems Project" for the transportation of Crude Oil in Burdwan District in the state of West Bengal by Indian Oil Corporation Limited;
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3375And whereas copies of the said Gazette notification were made available to the public up to 27th October 2018.
And whereas the competent authority has under sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act submitted report to the Central Government;
And Whereas the central Government, after considering the said report and on being satisfied that the said land is required for laying the pipeline, has decided to acquire right of user therein;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the land specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipeline;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that the right of user in the said land for laying the pipeline shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on the date publication of the declaration, in Indian Oil Corporation Limited, free from all encumbrances.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited shall be exclusively liable for any compensation in terms of Section 10 of the P&MP Act, 1962 and no suit, claim or legal proceeding would lie against the Central Government on any matter relating to the pipeline.
SCHEDULE
| District :Burdwan State : West Bengal | |||||
| Police Station | Name of Mouza | Survey No. | Area | ||
| Hectare | Are | Square Metre |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Raina – II Maniari - 138 334 00 14 61
335 00 06 20
336 00 01 58
338 00 04 15
337 00 00 50
373 00 26 18
373/782 00 24 10
372 00 19 56
404 00 00 20
405 00 01 39
406 00 00 54
409 00 05 58
408 00 06 06
431 00 03 46
430 00 05 54
439 00 04 45
440 00 00 43
441 00 08 60
3376 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
444 00 02 78
445 00 02 91
481 00 05 19
595 00 00 20
588 00 14 58
482 00 06 16
535 00 00 87
536 00 02 08
537/791 00 01 20
537 00 01 29
534 00 02 75
533 00 03 81
147 00 21 41
502 00 07 07
507 00 04 54
504 00 01 09
506 00 01 83
508 00 01 16
509 00 02 52
510 00 02 43
Raina – II Sankonarayanpur - 139 2165 00 02 15
2167 00 02 78
2515 00 07 35
2173 00 03 98
2172 00 02 21
2171 00 00 42
2178 00 00 87
2176 00 02 27
2177 00 00 45
2175 00 08 56
2185 00 01 55
2186 00 00 73
2191 00 06 16
2188 00 00 90
2192 00 01 02
2190 00 02 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3377
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2200 00 04 42 2199 00 00 31 2198 00 03 26 2203 00 01 15 2204 00 01 94 2205 00 02 74 2206 00 10 20 2081 00 02 96 2207 00 00 94 2080 00 08 54 2073 00 01 40 2072 00 03 43 2071 00 02 77 2055 00 04 89 2054 00 05 90 2051 00 02 00 2053 00 02 67 2052 00 00 96 1217 00 05 31 1216 00 04 25 1214 00 01 64 1220 00 08 49 1215 00 04 70 1221 00 06 09 1198 00 02 29 1195 00 04 08 1196 00 05 41 1194 00 01 58 1192 00 07 25 1190 00 03 42 1191 00 04 12 1188 00 11 27 1186 00 16 37 997 00 00 69 998 00 06 87 999 00 02 973378 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1009 00 02 05
1007 00 06 14
1010 00 00 91
1011 00 02 08
1015 00 03 17
1017 00 05 29
1016 00 01 13
1019 00 03 33
1018 00 06 49
1025 00 03 84
1026 00 03 67
1024 00 00 20
1027 00 08 41
1028 00 00 68
1030 00 01 77
1031 00 00 50
1034 00 09 12
1035 00 01 53
1036 00 00 20
936 00 06 65
823 00 03 91
822/2889 00 03 51
822 00 00 63
822/2890 00 01 75
822/2891 00 05 07
816 00 01 61
8162887 00 15 27
814 00 05 33
810 00 06 80
811 00 02 86
797 00 07 11
808 00 02 32
800 00 02 64
802 00 07 65
803 00 04 91
804 00 00 20
Khandoghosh Kaiar - 96 34 00 01 11
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3379
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Khandoghosh Kamadebpur - 95 249 00 01 50
248 00 02 36
247 00 02 52
Khandoghosh Gopalpur - 87 770 00 01 61
778/816 00 06 84
773 00 02 36
778 00 04 68
777 00 01 74
776 00 01 98
775 00 01 42
775/821 00 00 60
774/820 00 00 44
774 00 00 48
725 00 07 26
724 00 01 81
721 00 02 69
723 00 04 66
648 00 00 20
649 00 2 48
650 00 1 11
Khandoghosh Sankari - 70 1210 00 02 84
1194 00 00 95
1209 00 00 78
1199 00 00 52
1195 00 05 72
1196 00 01 74
846 00 01 30
845 00 02 93
851 00 05 44
852 00 06 93
855 00 04 72
857 00 01 18
858 00 01 43
856 00 00 35
862 00 01 89
859 00 00 20
3380 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
563 00 00 87 560 00 01 53 559 00 00 20 564 00 03 80 543 00 03 47 565 00 00 20 540 00 00 90 542 00 01 93 541 00 03 33 537 00 01 92 538 00 01 59 531 00 06 90 530 00 02 83 529 00 00 63 522 00 03 21 434 00 00 72 525 00 00 21 433 00 02 50 436 00 04 09 437 00 04 80 420 00 01 63 419 00 03 03 416 00 01 93 391 00 01 54 394 00 03 72 415 00 00 20 395 00 02 34 396 00 04 01 376 00 03 92 377 00 00 26 375 00 01 18 374 00 01 17 192 00 01 36 183 00 01 54 191 00 03 58 190 00 02 80[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3381
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
189 00 00 22
78 00 04 26
88 00 03 27
87 00 03 20
80 00 01 02
86 00 00 20
84 00 06 03
82 00 00 42
83 00 04 08
73 00 01 28
Khandoghosh Palasdanga - 60 421 00 06 73
422 00 00 20
419 00 02 54
418 00 03 30
417 00 00 97
416 00 03 54
405 00 02 03
406 00 00 53
404 00 01 70
365 00 01 22
366 00 01 69
388 00 00 24
387 00 02 36
384 00 00 20
386 00 00 74
385 00 05 07
375 00 00 20
376 00 02 29
310 00 00 20
309 00 00 89
308 00 01 33
306 00 03 69
305 00 00 20
303 00 02 62
482 00 05 62
264 00 05 30
3382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
158 00 01 30
154 00 00 29
157 00 00 79
155 00 00 20
156 00 01 77
161 00 02 04
163 00 00 23
163/932 00 00 82
164/933 00 01 01
164 00 01 45
164/934 00 00 91
165 00 02 27
230 00 00 61
47 00 03 98
46/907 00 01 74
46 00 02 89
71 00 02 48
80/919 00 00 39
81 00 03 60
80 00 03 07
84 00 01 19
83 00 00 24
85/873 00 01 73
85 00 01 34
Khandoghosh Wania - 59 630 00 00 82
633 00 00 45
183 00 05 36
186 00 01 21
182 00 00 44
185 00 00 20
187 00 01 56
189 00 01 10
179 00 00 33
191 00 00 51
190 00 02 10
192 00 01 07
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3383
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
194 00 00 60
195 00 00 42
196 00 00 57
202 00 04 48
201 00 00 52
199 00 01 15
200 00 03 68
206 00 04 66
209 00 05 15
214 00 07 38
213 00 00 25
215 00 04 17
101 00 00 20
100 00 03 94
99 00 05 03
52/675 00 00 20
99/679 00 05 60
53 00 03 52
95 00 02 52
94 00 04 17
90 00 02 71
91 00 00 27
78 00 03 89
76 00 00 23
79 00 02 80
80/650 00 00 20
75 00 08 13
74 00 01 01
Khandoghosh Krishnanagar - 51 538 00 02 37
537 00 04 49
535/2245 00 04 71
535/2246 00 00 96
535 00 01 39
502 00 6 65
503 00 03 35
504 00 06 56
506 00 05 35
3384 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
539 00 00 48
Khandoghosh Sasanga- 58 3247 00 02 73
3261 00 06 35
3262 00 04 71
3172 00 05 17
3167 00 01 80
3168 00 04 74
3171 00 00 20
3169 00 00 20
3170 00 07 08
3132 00 01 56
2375 00 01 46
2374 00 02 93
2381 00 00 20
2371 00 09 82
2402 00 04 27
2413 00 01 89
2347 00 07 37
2414 00 04 51
2415 00 02 55
2421 00 13 29
2416 00 02 53
2420 00 02 28
2280 00 02 42
2422 00 00 30
2425 00 05 50
2279 00 07 40
2259 00 01 31
2261 00 03 33
2262 00 03 43
2264 00 02 56
2263 00 01 93
2249 00 03 63
2248 00 01 36
232 00 01 60
231 00 02 46
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3385
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
234 00 00 20 235 00 02 10 237 00 00 20 222 00 00 94 221 00 01 15 220 00 00 93 218 00 00 32 219 00 01 55 217 00 01 10 249 00 01 35 250 00 00 33 248 00 00 81 251 00 01 88 247 00 00 29 252 00 03 02 199 00 04 44 198 00 01 68 200 00 02 73 196 00 02 35 194 00 00 47 195 00 03 78 81 00 00 20 83 00 03 38 84 00 00 85 82 00 00 91 91 00 04 41 93 00 02 58 70 00 01 30 69 00 02 78 68 00 00 77 67 00 04 00 65 00 03 95 26 00 00 49 64 00 01 63 62 00 06 57 61 00 00 313386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
37 00 04 67
39 00 05 48
40 00 00 73
38 00 00 20
Khandoghosh Napara - 56 2643 00 01 00
2642 00 00 20
1535 00 01 90
1536 00 13 05
Khandoghosh Masila - 57 767 00 07 69
769 00 00 20
763 00 00 90
745 00 06 49
744 00 02 99
743 00 00 20
731 00 03 17
734 00 00 96
735 00 00 61
732 00 00 20
733 00 02 19
736 00 00 62
728 00 02 25
727 00 02 12
726 00 01 41
719 00 00 20
725 00 01 52
722 00 01 57
721 00 01 80
705 00 00 20
693 00 04 62
694 00 03 07
695 00 00 37
688 00 02 68
603 00 00 20
608 00 02 75
467 00 03 03
466 00 04 72
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3387
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
464 00 02 84
463 00 00 20
462 00 00 71
426 00 03 40
427 00 00 40
461 00 02 50
459 00 02 24
458 00 04 74
452 00 01 47
450/1225 00 01 98
448 00 03 19
449 00 01 51
Galsi - II Konerpur - 126 2930 00 02 16
2907/3029 00 03 89
2907 00 02 21
2910 00 04 33
2911 00 02 51
2912 00 04 90
2915 00 01 67
2917 00 06 48
3012 00 00 20
3113 00 20 11
3117 00 10 82
3116 00 20 37
2934 00 23 09
2935 00 06 06
1311 00 20 87
1195 00 05 02
1200 00 03 28
1199 00 00 20
1189 00 11 49
1188 00 14 31
980 00 34 85
1088 00 02 29
933 00 00 20
909 00 09 38
3388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
769 00 00 20
750 00 00 73
750/969 00 00 85
325 00 00 20
770 00 01 02
465 00 12 19
749 00 00 43
748 00 00 71
747 00 00 20
328 00 05 91
329/1070 00 01 74
329 00 02 81
460 00 00 48
331 00 05 01
332 00 08 91
333 00 04 42
334 00 02 09
213 00 00 57
335 00 00 37
337 00 07 65
336 00 03 52
338 00 01 64
339 00 08 58
345 00 08 85
362 00 00 20
361 00 00 20
360 00 03 23
359 00 03 25
354 00 07 36
355 00 03 29
Galsi - II Belgram - 117 2389 00 02 86
2378 00 03 58
2311 00 02 57
2229 00 07 24
2165 00 04 98
2162 00 03 88
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3389
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3763 00 00 34 3764 00 06 42 3753 00 00 20 3752 00 04 22 3751 00 04 06 3750 00 06 82 3749 00 01 20 3689 00 03 04 3693/4105 00 02 09 3693 00 01 22 3692 00 00 23 3698 00 01 99 3694 00 00 75 3695 00 00 42 3696 00 01 51 3664 00 06 42 3663 00 02 61 3662 00 02 15 3595 00 02 65 3715 00 00 56 3594 00 01 62 3593 00 01 14 3716 00 01 42 3592/4329 00 01 45 3572 00 10 20 3573/4323 00 01 05 3574/4325 00 01 86 3574 00 03 59 3567 00 01 10 3580 00 00 42 3579 00 00 20 3512 00 02 67 3511 00 01 04 3510 00 01 64 3504 00 03 44 3509 00 00 203390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3401 00 03 67
3404 00 00 32
3403 00 03 02
3412 00 01 32
3413 00 01 27
3417 00 00 20
3415 00 02 06
3416 00 01 05
3427 00 03 57
3423 00 04 61
3168 00 04 17
3167 00 01 34
3173 00 00 34
3166 00 02 45
3176 00 02 12
3177 00 06 19
3183 00 03 06
3182 00 04 36
3194 00 02 40
3196 00 02 20
3195 00 01 28
3193 00 07 60
Galsi - II Satinandi - 114 5434 00 05 82
5433 00 00 20
5428/5964 00 01 87
5435 00 00 41
5436 00 06 61
5428 00 03 85
5423 00 11 48
5352 00 07 06
5353 00 06 61
5350 00 00 89
5354 00 00 95
5349 00 06 92
5348 00 02 16
5347 00 02 24
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3391
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4245 00 01 53 4243 00 02 68 4244 00 02 43 4242 00 00 20 4196 00 14 78 4234 00 04 00 4208 00 03 34 4218 00 00 97 4217 00 00 20 4209 00 03 89 4211 00 04 27 4216 00 06 37 4154 00 12 03 4347 00 02 14 4345 00 02 18 4135 00 02 05 3949 00 01 79 3970 00 04 17 3968 00 03 43 3967 00 00 20 3969 00 00 44 3964 00 01 24 3973 00 02 07 3962 00 00 20 3963 00 04 07 3974 00 02 41 4005 00 01 62 4002 00 05 19 4003 00 00 20 4000 00 00 20 4001 00 02 07 3998 00 01 75 4037 00 01 84 4038 00 01 50 4042 00 02 96 4044 00 00 203392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4052 00 02 41 4050 00 00 20 4051 00 01 95 2186/4417 00 00 77 2163 00 01 93 2164 00 00 82 2165 00 02 57 2173 00 00 20 2166 00 02 36 2167 00 00 22 2168 00 01 83 2169 00 01 04 2170 00 00 65 2171 00 03 20 2159 00 00 66 1930 00 02 54 2149 00 03 93 2148 00 02 32 1939 00 01 18 2144 00 01 72 2143 00 02 81 2141 00 01 49 2142 00 00 44 2142/4325 00 01 19 2096 00 00 81 1947/4367 00 00 60 1947 00 03 08 2094 00 05 21 1953 00 02 72 2065 00 01 35 1962 00 00 20 2064 00 01 40 1963 00 00 85 2063 00 00 43 1964 00 01 28 1965 00 01 92[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3393
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2051 00 01 18
2050 00 02 09
2049 00 04 58
2047/6171 00 02 27
2048 00 01 01
2044 00 04 38
2044/6170 00 04 34
2043 00 00 48
2016 00 02 15
6239 00 02 17
2294/6225 00 00 73
2019 00 04 42
2018 00 04 82
1792 00 05 40
1793 00 05 38
1795 00 00 68
1723 00 05 01
1722 00 05 36
1722/6118 00 04 35
1721 00 02 07
1718 00 00 20
1717 00 17 47
1713 00 00 89
Galsi - II Hitta - 112 3632 00 04 19
3633 00 00 57
3631 00 02 83
3629 00 00 72
3621 00 10 90
3619 00 00 89
3618 00 01 63
3614/4510 00 02 41
3603 00 01 16
3588 00 01 77
3587 00 02 25
3584 00 04 63
3591 00 01 80
3394 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3526 00 02 12 3527 00 12 80 3092/3714 00 04 67 3092 00 02 63 3093 00 06 93 3094 00 00 94 3095 00 02 27 3101 00 03 21 3102 00 01 17 3099 00 01 62 3104 00 01 44 3103 00 00 67 3108 00 01 27 3036 00 00 20 3031 00 04 09 3030 00 00 83 3033 00 00 20 3032 00 00 40 3027 00 03 15 3020 00 01 64 3021 00 01 55 3013 00 03 65 2889 00 00 77 3007 00 00 44 3012 00 00 20 2892 00 00 32 3011 00 00 20 2909 00 08 43 2910 00 06 04 2910/4472 00 03 93 3002 00 03 18 3001 00 04 24 3000 00 01 24 2999 00 00 20 2982 00 03 57 2980 00 07 10[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3395
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2978 00 01 04
2975 00 01 88
2868 00 00 98
2966 00 01 10
2969 00 00 20
2965 00 02 16
2964 00 02 79
2954 00 05 04
Galsi - II Channa - 111 4318 00 05 27
4317/4557 00 07 03
4322 00 01 24
4316 00 02 49
4310 00 02 14
4309 00 01 88
4311 00 00 87
4306 00 00 20
4308 00 02 09
4307 00 01 64
4312 00 01 18
4252 00 03 58
4351 00 00 31
4250 00 01 48
4248 00 01 64
4249 00 00 20
4245 00 00 51
4246 00 02 57
4243 00 02 26
4241 00 00 20
2750 00 00 88
2706 00 01 90
2705/2812 00 04 77
2705/2811 00 02 49
2704 00 00 72
2705 00 06 23
2705/2810 00 02 61
2568 00 00 20
2567 00 11 94
3396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2545 00 02 58 2544 00 02 85 2527 00 02 60 2528 00 03 78 2537 00 02 87 2529 00 01 25 2532 00 01 57 2531 00 04 42 2514 00 03 22 2515 00 00 44 2513 00 00 78 2535 00 00 20 2512 00 05 07 2421 00 02 21 2429 00 04 65 2428 00 03 23 2427 00 00 22 2430 00 02 09 2393 00 01 95 2431 00 03 82 2392 00 04 27 2390 00 02 10 2384 00 03 90 2383 00 00 28 2385 00 03 98 2376 00 01 14 2375 00 13 57 2243 00 07 46 2242 00 00 82 2241 00 00 57 2214 00 01 30 2215 00 02 61 2216 00 01 15 2217 00 04 52 2223 00 02 15 2224 00 03 83[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3397
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2225 00 03 14
2835 00 01 59
2228 00 04 61
2227 00 01 55
2226 00 02 56
2068/2830 00 00 81
131 00 00 20
122/422 00 00 87
122 00 05 08
124 00 05 20
123 00 01 94
118/423 00 01 91
118 00 00 59
117 00 01 09
116 00 03 72
114 00 03 42
115 00 02 24
100 00 09 97
94 00 08 96
92 00 02 69
93 00 02 32
89 00 04 89
88 00 00 20
90 00 03 23
31 00 02 44
32 00 06 80
38 00 05 69
37 00 08 29
22 00 00 90
4 00 04 65
14 00 06 11
1 00 16 26
Galsi - II Sankrai - 110 226 00 02 40
227 00 02 40
229 00 01 20
228 00 00 77
3398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Burdwan - I Nala - 20 3754 00 02 24
3753 00 04 46
3752 00 03 11
3706 00 00 87
3709 00 00 30
3708 00 02 58
3704 00 07 00
3714 00 03 07
3715/4919 00 06 96
3715/4833 00 00 42
3715 00 02 30
3701/4842 00 04 61
3701/4871 00 06 29
2505/5055 00 02 75
2505 00 11 85
2504 00 02 27
2506 00 01 72
2500 00 04 29
2498 00 06 38
2490 00 03 95
2491 00 00 60
2480/5341 00 00 97
2480 00 05 26
2482 00 02 79
2481 00 03 32
2471 00 01 51
2465 00 06 41
2466 00 06 36
2411 00 03 75
2410 00 00 61
2409 00 00 74
2407 00 02 56
2406 00 14 52
2397 00 03 18
2396 00 05 14
2395 00 06 07
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3399
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1130 00 00 84 1128 00 06 06 1125 00 04 35 1124 00 09 50 1164 00 00 90 1178 00 00 50 1123 00 00 93 1179 00 01 09 1120 00 04 84 1119 00 04 60 1118 00 01 39 1116 00 06 42 1115 00 09 87 1114 00 07 47 1112 00 02 38 1113 00 04 19 81 00 04 18 82 00 02 20 83 00 02 78 84 00 04 84 86 00 00 90 85 00 05 77 100 00 03 62 101 00 04 65 102 00 06 29 103 00 06 05 65 00 07 60 64 00 04 69 63 00 09 77 37 00 06 13 17 00 04 64 38 00 02 88 16 00 02 01 5140 00 13 85 15 00 11 60 14 00 00 983400 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
5115 00 00 29
5116 00 00 20
Ausgram - I Karanji - 147 1623 00 01 00
1620 00 00 20
1614 00 09 05
1613 00 03 32
1612 00 03 21
1611 00 02 24
700 00 00 92
1151 00 02 76
1150 00 02 99
1153 00 00 20
1154 00 03 28
1144 00 00 20
1148 00 08 64
1155 00 04 24
1147 00 01 36
1145 00 01 11
1143 00 02 11
1142 00 00 20
1093 00 01 80
1094 00 08 06
1097 00 04 41
1098 00 03 00
1099 00 02 14
1101 00 00 20
1100 00 00 91
1072 00 01 29
1071 00 00 76
1073 00 04 07
1069 00 00 99
1074 00 00 40
1066 00 01 56
1067 00 01 39
1064 00 03 89
1065 00 00 20
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3401
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Ausgram - I Bhada - 146 3014 00 00 44
3075 00 00 77
2924 00 01 61
2927 00 00 75
2926 00 00 75
2925 00 01 21
2928 00 01 30
2929 00 02 11
2929/3239 00 01 14
2937 00 00 20
2935 00 02 28
2934 00 00 20
2946 00 01 67
2947 00 00 22
2948 00 02 03
2945 00 00 92
2949 00 01 28
2950 00 00 20
2951 00 00 37
2902 00 01 96
2868 00 02 73
2867 00 01 18
2865 00 03 80
2726 00 00 20
2864 00 00 20
2735 00 04 31
2734 00 00 38
2738 00 01 48
2742 00 02 25
2743 00 01 73
2744 00 00 32
2739 00 00 20
2747 00 03 51
2746 00 00 33
2754 00 00 20
2758 00 00 79
3402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2640 00 00 20 2638 00 01 53 2636 00 00 20 2637 00 01 68 2643 00 00 44 2644 00 02 36 2645 00 00 20 2595 00 00 57 2594 00 00 95 2593 00 01 18 2586 00 00 68 2592 00 00 78 2591 00 01 53 2590 00 00 88 2589 00 01 33 2575 00 00 37 2600 00 00 20 2570 00 02 23 2573 00 00 23 2571 00 01 18 2569 00 01 31 2572 00 00 20 2565 00 00 64 2564/3237 00 03 03 2564 00 01 02 1017 00 00 20 1016 00 04 42 1010 00 00 21 1015 00 00 63 1014 00 03 58 872 00 01 37 876 00 02 90 874 00 00 59 875 00 01 90 879 00 04 15 852 00 05 84[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3403
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
823 00 04 08 824 00 02 48 826 00 00 20 825 00 01 28 818 00 00 20 817 00 01 03 816 00 02 07 815 00 00 31 300 00 01 58 808 00 00 20 813 00 04 67 810 00 00 28 811 00 02 14 812/1074 00 00 20 812 00 00 92 423 00 00 81 323 00 04 45 422/1056 00 00 83 422/1068 00 00 20 422 00 04 43 333 00 01 18 421 00 02 37 416 00 00 93 417 00 02 23 418 00 00 71 414 00 00 20 413 00 07 69 404 00 00 41 403 00 01 53 402 00 02 52 401 00 01 09 400 00 02 03 399 00 02 93 376 00 01 98 378 00 03 52 379 00 00 463404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Ausgram - I Belari - 148 4422 00 04 41
4062 00 00 77
3843/4962 00 00 57
3843 00 06 23
3839 00 00 43
4963 00 00 20
3840 00 04 60
3832 00 02 39
3847 00 03 68
3846 00 00 24
3851 00 00 20
3850 00 03 80
3849 00 02 43
3870 00 04 88
3868 00 00 60
3888 00 00 92
3890 00 00 72
3889 00 01 62
3894 00 00 20
3885 00 00 75
3886 00 00 20
3895 00 03 57
3896/4493 00 03 32
3932 00 00 20
3882 00 00 20
3931 00 01 09
3930 00 04 73
3926 00 03 76
3929 00 00 20
3927 00 00 20
3924 00 03 03
3917 00 01 72
3938 00 00 64
3966 00 04 66
3967 00 02 51
3968 00 01 05
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3405
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3968/4987 00 00 20
3971 00 02 60
3972 00 02 90
3973/4992 00 01 88
3815 00 01 12
3814 00 01 62
3816 00 00 95
3717 00 05 55
3719 00 07 46
3721 00 05 55
3720 00 02 17
3726 00 04 55
3740 00 02 58
3727 00 01 73
3728 00 02 77
3729 00 03 86
3730 00 01 14
3706 00 02 19
3705 00 00 20
Ausgram - I Belgram - 116 8182 00 05 25
8183 00 10 06
8185 00 01 89
8186 00 00 22
8177 00 07 64
8280 00 02 46
8176 00 00 70
8175/8272 00 01 90
8090 00 03 77
8091 00 05 28
8092 00 00 20
8089 00 00 20
8093 00 02 07
8094 00 01 77
8095 00 00 20
8098 00 03 72
8096 00 00 30
3406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
7912 00 04 16 8101 00 00 30 7911 00 02 82 7910 00 00 20 7907 00 03 50 7906 00 00 63 7908 00 02 99 7905 00 01 70 7887 00 01 44 7888 00 06 96 7889 00 00 62 7890 00 03 57 7892 00 06 74 7848 00 00 38 7846 00 10 07 7845 00 00 20 3440 00 00 54 7842 00 00 52 3426 00 01 74 3427 00 01 09 3425 00 00 20 3438 00 00 20 3428 00 02 95 3429 00 01 76 3430 00 00 38 3431 00 04 08 3433 00 01 70 3432 00 00 20 3467 00 06 42 3470 00 00 20 2931 00 00 43 3471 00 01 74 3472 00 00 26 3475 00 01 34 3474 00 00 89 4507 00 01 69[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3407
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4036 00 00 92 3482 00 02 93 4034 00 00 20 3486 00 03 50 4032 00 00 78 4031 00 06 65 4009 00 03 63 4028 00 00 20 4011 00 00 20 4050 00 00 20 4027 00 02 99 4023 00 01 95 4022 00 03 60 4020 00 04 10 3952 00 03 76 3944 00 00 80 3945 00 01 77 3943 00 02 82 3942 00 02 55 3941 00 02 37 3915 00 01 31 3916 00 02 59 3914 00 07 39 3848 00 02 32 3849 00 01 35 3862 00 01 45 3852 00 05 22 3854 00 03 74 3803 00 01 62 3802 00 00 86 3807 00 00 41 3801 00 03 17 3800 00 02 89 8427 00 00 26 4063 00 02 00 4090 00 13 813408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
4781 00 02 96 4097 00 06 99 4100 00 00 20 3635 00 02 38 2356 00 00 31 2355 00 04 87 2345 00 04 47 2344 00 03 12 2347 00 01 49 2343 00 00 41 2330 00 02 89 2337 00 06 06 2334 00 02 69 2332 00 01 43 1792 00 06 47 1778 00 00 20 1779 00 00 88 1791 00 00 20 1780 00 07 73 1772 00 00 20 1781 00 00 34 1771/1957 00 04 96 1771 00 00 46 1560 00 04 23 1559 00 00 92 1566 00 01 84 1565 00 00 20 1554 00 04 45 1553 00 00 40 1552 00 07 02 1550 00 03 10 1549 00 02 46 1548/1900 00 00 97 1455 00 00 30 1456 00 03 09 1457 00 05 29[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3409
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1459 00 01 01
1460 00 03 11
1461 00 03 72
1476/1948 00 00 42
1462 00 02 60
1463 00 01 15
1464 00 02 59
1466 00 01 20
1467 00 03 03
1221 00 02 58
1223 00 00 68
1222 00 02 01
1205 00 05 89
1204 00 02 98
1209 00 03 96
1202 00 00 20
1210 00 02 84
1201 00 00 50
1196 00 06 03
1195 00 05 03
1076 00 04 46
1075 00 03 60
1079 00 00 73
1073 00 00 20
1069 00 01 66
1070 00 05 26
1071 00 03 92
1067 00 00 20
1066 00 04 35
1059 00 07 00
Naoda - 115 1421 00 02 35
Ausgram - I
1218 00 02 41
1217 00 02 77
1216 00 02 30
1195 00 02 09
1192 00 00 39
3410 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1190 00 00 20
1189 00 03 48
Ausgram - I Sibada - 113 2246 00 00 84
2244 00 01 09
2245 00 00 71
2248 00 00 33
2242 00 02 52
2241 00 03 31
2239 00 04 23
2194 00 02 76
2195 00 02 80
2197 00 05 69
2152 00 00 20
2155 00 00 20
2151 00 03 21
2150 00 04 32
2211 00 07 50
2149 00 00 47
2213 00 08 80
1499 00 02 46
1500 00 09 49
1505 00 05 33
1509 00 10 02
1524/2585 00 00 91
1524 00 01 17
1525 00 00 83
1523 00 01 80
1528 00 02 45
1529 00 04 32
1537 00 01 57
1538 00 01 92
1534 00 03 12
1546 00 05 82
1550 00 02 68
1551 00 00 20
1552 00 01 36
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3411
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1222 00 01 58
1226 00 01 00
1227 00 04 92
1229 00 03 47
1230 00 00 97
1231 00 02 36
1178 00 02 81
1162 00 00 20
1161 00 01 88
1165/2611 00 05 89
1166 00 03 05
1174 00 01 55
1169 00 03 38
1170 00 03 11
1173 00 04 35
52/902 00 01 72
51 00 01 48
47 00 03 01
46 00 07 03
40 00 01 71
41 00 01 20
39 00 00 37
37 00 03 47
38 00 02 43
33 00 09 44
32 00 02 90
28 00 00 57
31 00 02 62
29 00 03 21
30 00 04 34
13 00 02 18
12 00 06 48
14 00 02 15
Ausgram - I Dwariapur - 118 7776 00 00 24
7775 00 00 85
7774 00 01 90
3412 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
7765 00 02 54
7680 00 02 29
7761 00 00 81
7760 00 06 38
7681 00 03 21
7759 00 00 99
7682 00 00 41
7683 00 01 73
Ausgram - I Guskara - 110 3586 00 02 33
3587 00 02 24
3589 00 06 81
3582 00 01 22
3594 00 00 31
3591 00 00 20
3593 00 03 40
3592 00 03 22
3600 00 01 44
3605 00 02 18
3606 00 00 20
3604 00 01 57
3602 00 00 55
3603 00 03 62
3563 00 01 74
3562 00 02 84
3561 00 00 35
3528 00 04 14
3529 00 08 90
3520 00 02 14
3518 00 01 59
3517 00 04 82
3515 00 00 20
3514 00 02 55
3485 00 00 20
3488 00 05 41
3486 00 00 28
3481 00 02 87
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3413
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
3476 00 02 71
3473 00 00 20
3472 00 02 86
3372 00 00 80
3368 00 06 60
3367 00 03 94
3351 00 00 20
3352 00 01 78
3349 00 04 10
3348 00 02 26
3347 00 00 20
3346 00 03 37
3303 00 01 25
3161 00 02 70
3160 00 01 63
3159 00 01 69
3157 00 00 55
Ausgram - I Somaipur - 72 4002 00 00 34
3581 00 00 20
3573 00 11 11
3574 00 02 90
3575 00 13 34
3576 00 00 70
3019 00 03 75
3015 00 02 46
3016 00 03 41
3017 00 04 05
3014 00 05 63
2849 00 02 53
2848 00 01 05
2842 00 05 31
2838 00 07 98
2840 00 04 87
2839 00 02 02
3075 00 05 79
3021 00 00 59
3414 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
2799 00 00 95
2798 00 04 21
2810 00 00 26
2779 00 01 49
2778 00 04 45
2777 00 03 78
2774 00 01 08
2737 00 03 50
2727 00 02 41
2736 00 02 28
2735 00 05 23
2695/3090 00 00 20
2695/3067 00 14 21
2695/3066 00 00 20
2695/3068 00 04 56
2695 00 13 99
2698 00 05 31
2699 00 03 17
2700 00 00 58
2696 00 03 73
2697 00 05 79
19 00 00 20
20 00 00 53
2672 00 02 92
18 00 08 68
36 00 03 12
38 00 05 25
39 00 06 27
40 00 04 55
3 00 02 12
2 00 00 20
1 00 02 86
Ausgram - I Baburbandh - 71 1640/1797 00 00 20
1640/1798 00 01 29
1622/1799 00 02 52
1611/1802 00 02 41
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3415
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1610 00 03 47
1615 00 12 08
1583 00 12 53
1576 00 11 39
1535 00 03 53
1536 00 06 04
1539 00 01 41
1540 00 01 48
1542 00 01 44
1543 00 02 41
1551 00 04 99
1552 00 04 91
790 00 00 20
791 00 05 40
828 00 10 69
821 00 01 49
822 00 00 48
823 00 00 57
820 00 01 43
815 00 03 96
814 00 00 87
712 00 00 45
812 00 03 60
244 00 01 92
Ausgram - I Silut - 69 1583 00 06 94
1591 00 04 80
1599 00 05 57
1598 00 02 83
1597 00 06 67
1562 00 08 74
1464 00 00 91
1465 00 03 35
1467 00 02 83
1468 00 05 52
1526 00 03 93
1525 00 01 28
3416 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1486 00 03 58
1487 00 00 27
1488 00 03 79
1489 00 00 20
1303 00 01 10
1304 00 02 05
1302 00 03 24
1301 00 05 87
1312 00 04 09
1290 00 02 10
1313 00 00 42
1285 00 01 71
1286 00 05 15
1277 00 01 24
1276 00 02 84
1273 00 04 48
1275 00 00 20
Ausgram - I Mallikpur - 68 710 00 06 01
709 00 00 20
707 00 04 22
706 00 04 47
679 00 07 19
680 00 00 76
678 00 05 04
677 00 00 34
638 00 01 49
640 00 05 20
639 00 00 20
642 00 02 85
633 00 08 97
633/834 00 00 50
629 00 04 93
628 00 00 20
625 00 09 11
626 00 03 55
595 00 01 89
Ausgram - I Beranda - 74 858 00 01 22
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3417
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
846 00 00 29
847 00 00 20
849 00 01 35
844 00 03 69
841 00 00 20
842 00 01 19
843 00 01 26
815 00 00 28
806 00 04 80
805 00 00 23
798 00 01 61
804 00 05 94
1437 00 13 58
Ausgram - I Srikrishnapur - 77 382 00 06 60
384 00 04 50
383 00 01 42
398 00 13 53
354 00 06 66
348 00 08 24
335 00 01 98
333 00 00 99
334 00 04 84
318 00 05 50
317 00 04 95
319 00 01 31
310 00 04 44
311 00 00 20
309 00 05 91
Ausgram - II Chandradwip - 78 679/818 00 14 90
677 00 06 69
622 00 04 18
676 00 00 20
624 00 10 74
626 00 03 98
632 00 08 41
637 00 04 12
3418 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
597 00 08 31
596/810 00 01 50
595 00 06 84
Ausgram - II Baksibadpogram - 83 2118 00 04 57
2120 00 05 36
2365 00 00 20
2394 00 03 80
2115 00 01 76
2114 00 00 77
2113 00 07 58
2107 00 06 37
2108 00 00 20
2109 00 03 98
2030 00 01 57
2029 00 02 25
2031 00 02 75
2032 00 00 20
2026 00 04 42
2025 00 02 14
2024 00 00 20
2018 00 08 76
2019 00 00 20
2009 00 03 57
2002 00 03 28
2001 00 02 91
1885 00 04 75
1883 00 02 86
1882 00 03 32
1881 00 05 51
1880 00 02 86
1868 00 03 42
1867 00 04 45
1853 00 00 20
1852 00 02 46
1850 00 02 56
1851 00 00 23
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3419
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
Ausgram - II Reora - 82 1282/1337 00 03 39
1280 00 01 07
1282 00 03 12
1283 00 01 07
1276 00 01 83
1270 00 04 44
1271 00 04 56
1268 00 00 20
1262 00 03 54
1261 00 01 74
1260 00 03 73
1259 00 02 36
1211 00 00 45
1220 00 04 10
1221 00 00 20
1222 00 02 39
1236 00 05 16
1237 00 00 20
1223 00 02 47
1233 00 02 18
1232 00 02 21
1230 00 00 25
1231 00 03 01
1138 00 02 70
1137 00 00 59
1136 00 01 65
1131 00 07 93
1132 00 00 91
1129 00 03 07
1130 00 03 72
1128 00 00 20
1127 00 03 68
205 00 00 65
206 00 00 63
1126 00 03 15
823 00 00 92
3420 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
820 00 01 30
819 00 01 63
224 00 05 94
225 00 02 56
226 00 03 08
232 00 00 37
231 00 02 33
233 00 00 20
243 00 00 90
242 00 01 43
244 00 00 55
249 00 05 03
257 00 01 14
251 00 05 49
252 00 00 77
255 00 02 02
254 00 01 08
266 00 01 38
267 00 01 98
50 00 03 76
51 00 00 46
45 00 04 15
44 00 01 57
34 00 03 88
35 00 00 44
7 00 04 80
5 00 13 70
4 00 00 61
Nrisinhapur - 79 468 00 06 61
Ausgram - II
467 00 06 65
466 00 03 31
465 00 00 60
464 00 05 18
462 00 00 20
485 00 00 20
463 00 03 28
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3421
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
453 00 03 67
454 00 00 20
443 00 02 73
452 00 00 20
444 00 01 37
442 00 01 36
441 00 03 10
199 00 01 10
198 00 00 20
200 00 02 83
197 00 00 84
203 00 05 72
208 00 01 67
58 00 02 17
216 00 00 20
175 00 10 80
65 00 03 52
69 00 00 20
68 00 05 32
73 00 00 56
47 00 16 91
75 00 00 32
48 00 01 80
38 00 05 01
20 00 03 61
19 00 01 92
19/1302 00 00 20
18 00 03 16
17 00 04 94
16 00 01 22
5 00 01 60
6 00 05 02
Ausgram - II Bilshanda - 81 257 00 03 33
254 00 01 59
253 00 05 46
252 00 01 44
3422 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
92 00 02 37
95 00 02 68
94 00 06 02
104 00 04 58
105 00 02 39
106 00 00 43
72 00 08 49
107 00 02 86
66 00 07 37
65 00 02 57
50 00 04 14
51 00 02 23
64 00 00 27
54 00 03 20
52 00 11 00
53 00 00 22
25 00 06 02
11 00 02 65
6/1066 00 00 64
6/1064 00 00 16
6/1062 00 01 49
6/1067 00 01 21
2/1068 00 11 28
2/1069 00 04 02
2/1070 00 09 34
2/1097 00 03 07
1 00 10 49
Bhatar Orgram - 11 13401 00 00 20
13402 00 03 35
13403 00 01 92
13404 00 00 46
13405 00 03 42
13406 00 04 10
13400 00 00 20
13407 00 03 43
13408 00 02 07
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3423
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
13389 00 03 15 13391 00 07 61 13860 00 04 61 13374 00 00 20 13373 00 06 68 13371 00 02 65 13370 00 04 34 13182 00 02 06 1316 00 03 51 1315 00 02 22 1313 00 03 19 1306 00 10 03 1301 00 00 66 1155 00 12 33 1156 00 06 10 1157 00 00 20 1158 00 01 94 1149 00 01 49 1151 00 01 20 1050/17620 00 00 97 17621 00 01 51 17622 00 01 62 1143 00 01 15 17624 00 02 03 17625 00 01 91 17626 00 02 65 1138 00 00 39 1137 00 02 11 1139 00 02 18 1136 00 01 93 1131 00 00 20 1125 00 03 97 1129 00 08 29 1107 00 02 23 1106 00 02 21 1105 00 02 743424 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
1008 00 00 20 991 00 01 05 972 00 06 23 973 00 04 57 974 00 03 45 983 00 01 30 982 00 08 53 955 00 10 17 952 00 00 44 953 00 01 39 954 00 04 29 769 00 01 92 770 00 06 19 15656 00 02 29 619 00 13 46 620 00 05 80 611 00 02 34 609 00 02 83 607 00 01 89 608 00 03 95 602 00 06 90 603 00 00 71 601 00 01 20 634 00 02 51 635 00 09 52 638 00 00 20 636 00 01 70 637 00 00 25 640 00 00 59 642 00 01 65 326 00 01 65 649 00 00 37 325 00 07 38 246/15689 00 03 47 246/15688 00 03 78[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3425
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
246/894 00 00 61 246/893 00 01 85 247 00 06 96 246/895 00 00 20 246 00 01 79 248 00 06 73 249 00 03 71 250 00 08 30 251 00 04 14 252 00 06 89 197 00 02 07 196 00 01 66 198 00 06 12 187 00 04 17 94 00 03 37 186 00 02 98 95 00 03 05 96 00 01 32 97 00 02 95 77 00 04 84 75 00 02 20 74 00 03 01 70 00 00 47 69 00 02 79 65 00 02 92 67 00 00 66 68 00 00 20 63 00 00 81 61/859 00 06 06
[F. No. R-11025(II)22/2018-OR-I/E27779]
SANTANU DHAR, Under Secy.
3426 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;Je ,oa jkstxkj ea=ky;
ubZ fnYyh] 18 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-787.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eq[; izca/kd] fganqLrku ,;jksukWfVDl fyfeVsM ukfld (,e,l) ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds izca/kra=z ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k CGIT&&&&2@24 of 2008) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 03@04@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 18th April, 2019
S.O.787.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT-2/24 of 2008) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Chief Manager, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Nasik (MS) and their workmen & Others, which was received by the Central Government on 03-04-2019
[No. L-42012/168/2008–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
REFERENCE NO.CGIT-2/24 of 2008
(Ministry Order No.L-42012/168/2005-IR(CM-II), dt.07/04/2008)
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED
The Chief Manager (P & A) Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Ojhar Township (PO) Nasik (MS) 422 207. AND THEIR WORKMEN Nashik Workers Union CITU Kamgar Bhavan Khutwad Nagar Kamathwade Nashik 422 008. Mumbai, dated the 1st February, 2019.
CORRIGENDUM TO AWARD DATED 09/02/2015
Mr. R.S. Pande, President, Nashik Workers Union has filed an application stating that there is an error in Award dt. 9/2/2015 passed in Ref.CGIT-2/24 of 2008. The names mentioned in the list of workmen enclosed with the Order of Reference received from Ministry were inadvertently not mentioned in the award. In addition to this some of the names as mentioned in the Annexure are incorrect and require to be corrected. Orders were passed on the said application allowing the same.
2. In the circumstances, the list enclosed with the order of reference is included in the award and the names of the workers mentioned in the award dt. 9/2/2005 is corrected as per Annexure B to the application (Ex-287).
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3427List of Casual Labourers
CPM DEPARTMENT
| 1. | Shri Nana Chagan Thakare |
| 2. | Shri Ramesh Baburao Khade |
| 3. | Shri Narendra Bhimashankar Kande |
| 4. | Shri Vinod Premjibhai Jagtiya |
| 5. | Shri Shridhar Natthou Nagare |
| 6. | Shri Shantaram Raghunath Tribhuwan |
| 7. | Shri Ashok Ambu Balsane |
| 8. | Shri Ramdas Bhagwant Mogare |
| 9. | Shri Atul Laxman Joshi |
| 10. | Shri Murlidhar Sukdeo Kadam |
| 11. | Shri Uttam Daular Dhage |
| 12. | Shri Devanand Sadashiv Salve |
| 13. | Shri Ullhas Devrambhai Kansara |
| 14. | Shri Gautam Shivram Sonwane |
| 15. | Shri Ashok Sampat Chaudhari |
| 16. | Shri Subhas Tanjaji Gaikwad |
| 17. | Shri Dattraya Murlidhar Kanse |
| 18. | Shri Bhimrao Dagdu Nikam |
| 19. | Shri Jagnnath Zabu Koli |
| 20. | Shri Dhananjay Lilidhar Bhattad |
| 21. | Shri Popat Bhoru Mali |
| 22. | Shri Dilip Eknath Pagare |
| 23. | Shri Jalidhar Bajirao Kshirsagar |
| 24. | Shri Jangle Ambu Waghchaure |
| 25. | Shri Bapu Raghunath Lokhande |
| 26. | Shri Daulat Sayaji Jadhav |
| 27. | Shri Bhausaheb Bhaguji Deshmukh |
| 28. | Shri Rajaram Savliram Somase |
| 29. | Shri Avinash Kisan Sonwane |
| 30. | Shri Sanjay Karbhari Shete |
| 31. | Shri Kailash Narayan Ahire |
| 32. | Shri Sahebrao Laxman Rajole |
| 33. | Shri Sanjay Lahanu Chadhauri |
| 34. | Shri Ratan Nana Shinde |
| 35. | Shri Rajendra Raghunath Pawar |
| 36. | Shri Jitendra Kasturichand Kasliwal |
| 37. | Shri Parashram Khandu Borade |
| 38. | Shri Ravi Bhaskar Shinde |
| 39. | Shri Kailash Lahu Bhadange |
| 40. | Shri Vikram Pundlik Pagar |
| 41. | Shri Nivruti Damu Sonwane |
| 42. | Shri Sham Kisan Jagzap |
| 43. | Shri Sunil Sampat Salunkhe |
| 44. | Shri Ramesh Umaji Pardhe |
| 45. | Shri Tushar Chintaman Pagare |
| 46. | Shri Bhaskar Fakira Mahajan |
| 47. | Shri Ashok Hiraman Salve |
| 48. | Shri Bharat Sukdeo Kamble |
| 49. | Shri Pravin Madhukar Barve |
| 50. | Shri Indarlal Devji Tungar |
| 51. | Shri Jagdish Appaji Gaikwad |
| 52. | Shri Sandeep Rupchand Man |
| 53. | Shri Deepak Sumatilal Kothari |
| 54. | Shri Vinod Vitthal Kansara |
| 55. | Shri Madan Baburao Salve |
| 56. | Shri Rajesh Vishnupant Borse |
| 57. | Shri Dilip Fakira Navgire |
| 58. | Shri Pavan Rikhabchand Kasliwal |
| 59. | Shri Sanjay Bhaidas Pawar |
| 60. | Shri Avinash Babasaheb Gadkari |
| 61. | Shri Shrikrishna Narendra Pawar |
| 62. | Shri Sijay Shivaji Shelar |
| 63. | Shri Rajesh Ramdas Patulkar |
| 64. | Shri Rafik Babu Shaikh |
| 65. | Shri Prakash Bhaskar Nikam |
| 66. | Shri Mahesh Murlidhar Danekar |
| 67. | Shri Nilesh Pundlik Pawar |
| 68. | Shri Gotiram Shivaji Katle |
| 69. | Shri Deepak V. Jadhav |
| 70. | Smt. Reena Chattarji |
| 71. | Smt. Laxmivai Kamalakar Kasar |
| 72. | Shri Madanlal Madhukar Shinde |
| 73. | Smt. Vasanti Ramubhai Chaudhari |
| 74. | Smt. Manorama Trambak Thakare |
| 75. | Smt. Manisha Devdas Ikhankar |
| 76. | Smt. Shaila Sarvottam Dharmadk |
| 77. | Smt. Shailaja Bhaudnath Sonar |
| 78. | Smt. Asha Niurutti Pagare |
| 79. | Smt. Shamla Ramkrushna Dhawale |
| 80. | Smt. Vimal Vasudev Bharmbe |
| 81. | Smt. Shaile Balnath Jadhav |
| 82. | Smt. Suman Suresh Patil |
| 83. | Smt. Vijaya Sasantrao Kumawat |
| 84. | Shri Kishore Manohar Chaudhari |
| 85. | Shri Vilas Niurutti Jadhav |
| 86. | Smt. Sharda Dwarkadas Pathak |
| 87. | Shri Balu Gatlaj Burade |
| 88. | Shri Jairam Laxman Lahange |
| 89. | Shri Ganpat Popat Bendkule |
| 90. | Shri Chandrakant Visram Salve |
| 91. | Shri Laximan Dadulal Bhujwa |
| 92. | Shri Punja Vithoba Dighe |
| 93. | Shri Bhaskar Vajira Dhangale |
| 94. | Shri Shivaji Narayan Pargaonkar |
| 95. | Shri Ramdas Rajaram Deore |
| 96. | Shri Murlidhar Baburao Adhav |
| 97. | Shri Bhaskar Ramkrishna Hiralkar |
| 98. | Shri Arjun Rama Pardhe |
| 99. | Shri Yeshwant Niurutti Dhikale |
| 100. | Shri Manohar Sampat Chaudhari |
| 101. | Shri Sunil Shankar Gangurde |
CPO DEPARTMENT
| 1. | Shri Prabhakar Ramchandra Katkade |
| 2. | Shri Balusaheb Damodhar Atre |
| 3. | Shri Bhagwat Damodhar Jadhav |
| 4. | Shri Balu Pandurang Jadhav |
| 5. | Shri Jalam Hari Chavan |
| 6. | Shri Balu Tukaram Tidke |
| 7. | Shri Bhaskar Namdeo Ahire |
| 8. | Shri Ramesh Kashinath Musale |
| 9. | Shri Suryabhan Trambak Mokal |
| 10. | Shri Arun Nana Nirbhavane |
| 11. | Shri Nana Onkar Ahire |
| 12. | Shri Shivaji Vishwanath Kothawade |
| 13. | Shri Sopan Kumar Das |
| 14. | Shri Nimba Keshav Nerkar |
| 15. | Shri Ramesh Dagu Kshirsagar |
| 16. | Shri Gajanan Pandurang Zaparde |
| 17. | Shri Chandrakant Hiraman Sangole |
| 18. | Mrs. Sudha Krishnarao Mule |
| 19. | Shri Natthu Tukaram Dhikale |
| 20. | Shri Sanjay Pundlik Ganore |
| 21. | Shri Pandurang Gopal Yeole |
| 22. | Shri K.D. Khelukar |
| 23. | Shri Samadhan Deoram Dhangde |
| 24. | Shri Ravindra Dhaji Patil |
| 25. | Shri Bhima Kachru Bhadake |
| 26. | Shri Namdeo Bhaurao Dhole |
| 27. | Shri Viushnu Baburao Adhav |
| 28. | Shri Balu Baburao Adhav |
| 29. | Shri Mohan S. Shirsath |
| 30. | Shri Ashok Ramrao Belekar |
| 31. | Shri Vilas Sukdeo Gangurde |
| 32. | Shri Ansar Sadik Shaikh |
| 33. | Shri Ahok Madhu Nikaji |
| 34. | Smt. Lilivati Manohar Kor |
List of Casual Labourers
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT : DRIVERS
| 1. | Shri Anand Sadashiv Chandramore |
| 2. | Shri Datatray Daoram Zomam |
| 3. | Shri Bakerao Bapu Zoman |
| 4. | Shri Manik Raghunah Boraste |
| 5. | Shri Nandkumar Ramdas Goverdhane |
| 6. | Shri Sakhahari Mahadu Sonwane |
| 7. | Shri Roshankhan Magdunkhan Mulla |
| 8. | Shri Maruti Ramchandra Thorat |
| 9. | Shri Chandrakant Trambak Shirsagar |
| 10. | Shri Shashikant Vasantrao Deshpande |
| 11. | Shri Uday Manikrao Tanpure |
| 12. | Shri Tanaji Gorakh Kadam |
| 13. | Shri Vijay Pundlik Pagare |
| 14. | Shri Kashinath Laxman Patil |
| 15. | Shri Ambadas Vitthal Chavan |
| 16. | Shri Yuvraj Bhimrao Mokashi |
| 17. | Shri Tanaji Vithoba Dhikale |
| 18. | Shri Kailash Sampat Gangurde |
| 19. | Shri Vinod Madhavrao Deogire |
| 20. | Shri Harun Hasan Shaikh |
| 21. | Shri Kailash Karbhari Suruse |
| 22. | Shri Harvindersingh Sukdeo Shiddu |
| 23. | Shri Ajitsingh Tejsingh Chavan |
| 24. | Shri Balu Jagannath Dhilake |
| 25. | Shri Padamkar Khanderao Deshmuh |
| 26. | Shri Rajjak Sardar Sayyad |
| 27. | Shri Ravindersingh Harcharan Malhotra |
| 28. | Shri Hemant Shivram Kulkarni |
| 29. | Shri Sharad Dattatray Dhatrak |
| 30. | Shri Dipak Pundik Kumbharde |
| 31. | Shri Nivruti Jairam Shirsath |
| 32. | Shri Sopan Chandu Gaikwad |
| 33. | Shri Dhondurama Bhangare |
| 34. | Shri Rangnath Hari Marade |
| 35. | Shri Antu Bapu Jagtap |
| 36. | Shri Bhagwan Jagnnath More |
| 37. | Shri Ramesh Punja Kamble |
| 38. | Shri Sunil Baburao Ubale |
List of Casual Labourers
MEDICAL SERVICES (CMS-130)
| 1. | Shri Eknath Kachru Shardul |
| 2. | Shri Laxman Sitaram Hire |
| 3. | Shri Sakharam K. Ingle |
| 4. | Shri Jankiram Nilu Fule |
| 5. | Shri Popat Sakharam Sonwane |
| 6. | Shri Navnath Chintaman Jagtap |
| 7. | Shri Chandrabhan Gumaji Solse |
| 8. | Shri Raju Balvant Gangurde |
| 9. | Shri Dinkar Jagnnath Ahire |
| 10. | Shri Suresh Dudhaji Salve |
| 11. | Shri Dattu Shankar Jondhale |
| 12. | Shri Shivaji Bhagwat Ahire |
| 13. | Shri Ashok Nana Sonwane |
| 14. | Shri Chintaman Dharmji Khade |
| 15. | Shri Nana Sampat Shewale |
| 16. | Shri Gopal Kaniyalal Chaudhuri |
| 17. | Shri Madhav Nivruti Shirsath |
| 18. | Shri Prakash Gangadhar Eknath |
| 19. | Shri Dhyansehwar Laxman Bhadane |
| 20. | Shri Suresh Nana Patekar |
| 21. | Shri Anand Bhaskar Bagul |
| 22. | Shri Shivaji Dashrath Kakipure |
| 23. | Shri Gautam Jagnnath Nikam |
| 24. | Shri Shantaram Dagu Gadgil |
| 25. | Shri Kailash K. Khare |
| 26. | Shri Arun Murlidhar Shirsath |
| 27. | Shri Vijay Rajaram Gaikwad |
| 28. | Smt. Kusumbai Mangu Pawar |
| 29. | Smt. Hirabai Popat Khare |
| 30. | Smt. Sugandabai Madhukar Jadhav |
| 31. | Smt. Lahanubai Nana Sonwane |
| 32. | Smt. Ashabai Kanaiyalal Piraswany |
| 33. | Smt. Bhikubai Kacharu Kambale |
| 34. | Smt. Taibai Eknath Gangurde |
| 35. | Smt. P. Kakade |
| 36. | Smt. Jijabai Damodhar Shirsath |
| 37. | Smt. Tarabai Dadu Sonwane |
| 38. | Smt. Sakira Begam Hamidabai |
| 39. | Smt. Minabai Gopal Chadhuri |
| 40. | Smt. Shamabai Konaiyalal Chadhuri |
| 41. | Smt. Sunita R. Paranjape |
| 42. | Smt. Muklabai Raju Gangurde |
| 43. | Smt. Narmadabi Bhiku Gutane |
| 44. | Smt. Kusumbai Ramdas Jadhav |
| 45. | Smt. Ambabai Madhukar Hire |
| 46. | Smt. Vimalbai Kisan Gangurde |
| 47. | Smt. Suman Sudam Dinkar |
| 48. | Smt. Prarnilabai Prabhakar Gangurde |
| 49. | Smt. Maiatibai Bhatkulkar |
| 50. | Smt. Janabai Yadav |
| 51. | Smt. Lilabai Shivram Gangurde |
| 52. | Smt. Vijayabai Hiram Ahire |
| 53. | Shri S.S. Gaikwad |
| 54. | Shri S.A. Gaware |
| 55. | Shri P.R. Patil |
| 56. | Shri K.M. Malik |
| 57. | Shri Shantaram B. Nehare |
| 58. | Shri Iswar P. Dive |
| 59. | Smt. S.D. Burade |
List of Casual Labourers
(WORKS & SERVICES DEPARTMENT)/ FW/675
SANITATION WORK IN FACTORY AREA
| 1. | Shri Ramesh Rajaram Surudkar |
| 2. | Shri Dinanath Atmaram Patil |
| 3. | Shri Ashok Hari Gangurde |
| 4. | Shri Dagu Damu Ahire |
| 5. | Shri Bhaskar Sadasiv Ahire |
| 6. | Shri Bharat Kahiram Nikam |
| 7. | Shri Dattu Supdu Sonwane |
| 8. | Shri Sanjay Karbhari Mhaishdhune |
| 9. | Shri Sukdeo Kisan Divse |
| 10. | Shri Antu Kisan Nikam |
| 11. | Shri Motiram Rambhaji Rokde |
| 12. | Shri Ashok Dashrath Pawar |
| 13. | Shri Dilip Shrawan Nikam |
| 14. | Shri Popat Daguji Nikam |
| 15. | Shri Lahanu Baburao Khare |
| 16. | Shri Avinash Madhukar Nirbhavane |
| 17. | Shri Pandit Laxman Kedare |
| 18. | Shri Baburao Dagdu Gangurde |
| 19. | Shri Ramgir Bavgir Gosavi |
| 20. | Shri Bhagwat Rajaram Sansare |
| 21. | Shri Subhash Vithal Kedare |
| 22. | Shri Subhash Bapurao Karanajakar |
| 23. | Shri Vilas Bhimaji Pagare |
| 24. | Shri Nivruti Kacharu Shardul |
| 25. | Shri Vilas Baburao Jadhav |
| 26. | Shri Balu Waman Jadhav |
| 27. | Shri Balu Bhimrao Ahire |
| 28. | Shri Eknath Tulsiram Gangurde |
| 29. | Shri Nana Pandhil Shinde |
| 30. | Shri Sitaram Kashiram Nikam |
| 31. | Shri Sampat Rakhamaji Nikam |
| 32. | Shri Uttam Tulsiram Gangurde |
| 33. | Shri Gulab Shankar Gangurde |
| 34. | Shri Anand Kalu Sonwane |
| 35. | Shri Dinkar Punjali Tuplondhe |
| 36. | Shri Nathu Balwant Pagare |
| 37. | Shri Sudhakar Shankar Ubale |
| 38. | Shri Kisan Nimbaji Jadhav |
| 39. | Shri Yuvraj Supdu Sardar |
| 40. | Shri Kisan Laxman Hatge |
| 41. | Shri Achutrao Shankar Joshi |
| 42. | Shri Babu Damaji Gawali |
| 43. | Shri Eknath Madhav Ahire |
| 44. | Shri Anna Gangadhar Jadhav |
| 45. | Shri Ramesh Genu Gangurde |
| 46. | Shri Gopichand Bajirao Mahajan |
| 47. | Shri Dilip Ganpat Chaudhari |
| 48. | Shri Ismail Gulab Shaikh |
| 49. | Shri Ramesh Shivaji Sutar |
| 50. | Shri Suresh Shridhar Pawar |
| 51. | Shri Hiramn Mahadu Jondhale |
| 52. | Shri Ramesh Dashrath Sonwane |
| 53. | Shri Ramrao Trambak Argade |
| 54. | Shri Ganesh Honaji Dambale |
| 55. | Shri Motiram Shridhar Pawar |
| 56. | Shri Sanjay Popat Nikale |
| 57. | Shri Mujid Canisaheb Pathan |
| 58. | Shri Sanjay Jibhau Garud |
| 59. | Shri Ashok Waman Balsane |
| 60. | Shri Vishwanath Shankar Zoman |
| 61. | Shri Balu Kashinath Dambale |
| 62. | Shri Shivaji Damu Gotarne |
| 63. | Shri Ashok Dhondiram Kadale |
| 64. | Shri Malhari Namdeo Kadale |
| 65. | Shri Uttam Punja Jadhav |
| 66. | Shri Ramesh Trambak Thorat |
| 67. | Shri Dadaji Mahandu Panpatil |
| 68. | Shri Nandu Nmidash Torne |
| 69. | Shri Irshad Ahmad Shaikh |
| 70. | Shri Madhukar Shankar Dhilake |
| 71. | Shri Sahebrao Tukaram Wavdhane |
| 72. | Shri Balu Devram Ahire |
| 73. | Shri Motiram Jagannath Chavan |
| 74. | Shri Dilip Waman Pagare |
| 75. | Shri Sunil Daneshwar Sasane |
| 76. | Shri Mohan Kacharu Bachate |
| 77. | Shri Tanaji Punklik Kale |
| 78. | Shri Vijay Shankar Gaikwad |
| 79. | Shri Raju Manikrao Naik |
| 80. | Shri Bhausaheb N. Ugade |
| 81. | Shri Ashok Balwant Mahale |
| 82. | Shri Vijaynath Baburao Pote |
| 83. | Shri Balu Punja Nirbhavane |
| 84. | Shri Sunil Jagannath Wagh |
| 85. | Shri Sambhaji Nana Sonwane |
| 86. | Shri Rathilal Jagannath Thade |
| 87. | Shri Bavsaheb P. Kedare |
| 88. | Shri Dilip Chindhu Jondhale |
| 89. | Shri Ashok B. Lokhande |
| 90. | Shri Sanjay Kisan Pillye |
| 91. | Shri Ajay Ellaiya Pedraj |
| 92. | Shri Narayan Baban Bairagi |
| 93. | Shri Balu Gopala Kadam |
| 94. | Shri Chintaman T. Korde |
List of Casual Labourers
WORKERS & SERVICES DEPARTMENT (SANITATION WORK IN TOWNSHIP)
| 1. | Smt. Gothule Rambhabai Bhikaji |
| 2. | Smt. Jadhav Mirabai Jayawant |
| 3. | Smt. Gaikwad Sarubai Rajaram |
| 4. | Shri Sonwane Dada Ramdas |
| 5. | Shri Salve Sunil Eknath |
| 6. | Shri Salve Chandrakant Punja |
| 7. | Shri Gangurde Shivram Jabaji |
| 8. | Shri Pagare Suryabhan Bhimaji |
| 9. | Shri Garud Dadu Shankar |
| 10. | Shri Nikam Jalal Kashinath |
| 11. | Shri Shardul Dinkar Kachru |
| 12. | Shri Hire Ashok Savliram |
| 13. | Shri Mahale Murlidhar Sursingh |
| 14. | Shri Gothule Waman Bhika |
| 15. | Shri Jadhav Waman Barku |
| 16. | Shri Nikam Ramchandra Kisan |
| 17. | Shri Hire Dagu Kisan |
| 18. | Smt. Bhadange Kaushabai Rangnath |
| 19. | Smt. Ahire Parvatabai JAgan |
| 20. | Smt. Sonwane Dwarkabai Totaram |
| 21. | Smt. Pote Anjanbai Fakira |
| 22. | Smt. Nikam Ranjanabai Bharat |
| 23. | Smt. Jadhav Vimalbai Prabhakar |
| 24. | Smt. Nikale Latabai Bhagwan |
| 25. | Smt. Jagtap Sundrabai Ghaman |
| 26. | Smt. Gangurde Sonubai Balwant |
| 27. | Smt. Kedare Shantabai Kabhu |
| 28. | Smt. Jagtap Banubai Banshi |
| 29. | Smt. Ahire Tarabai Bhimrao |
| 30. | Smt. DivseATikabai Kisan |
| 31. | Smt. Kardak Hirabi Popat |
| 32. | Smt. Shardul Lilabai Dinkar |
| 33. | Smt. Jadhav Sakhubai Kashinath |
| 34. | Smt. Jadhav Babanbai Balkrishna |
| 35. | Smt. Kedare Nadarbai Vitthal |
| 36. | Shri Diama Culchand Mashara |
| 37. | Shri Panpatil Vijay Thakaji |
| 38. | Shri Kadpane Nanaji Waman |
| 39. | Shri Jadhav Shashikant Khanderao |
| 40. | Shri Mehar Jivenshingh |
| 41. | Shri Gosavi Satish Dattaray |
| 42. | Smt. Pardeshi Shankutala Prakash |
List of Casual Labourers
TOOL CRIB SECTION TP/615
| 1. | Shri G.M. Pagare |
| 2. | Shri L.B. Watle |
| 3. | Shri A.K.Sable |
| 4. | Shri H.H. Maule |
| 5. | Shri C.G. Tope |
| 6. | Shri R.B. Bagul |
| 7. | Shri R.N. Bhandari |
| 8. | Shri R.D. Bherad |
| 9. | Shri S.K. Fasale |
| 10. | Shri I.J. Chimankar |
List of Casual Labourers
MAINTENANCE OF ST PLANT & SUMPWELL IN TOWNSHIP
| 1. | Shri Sansare Gangadhar Rajaram |
| 2. | Shri Salve Dayaldas Punja |
| 3. | Shri Khaire Nandu Karbhari |
| 4. | Shri Dhongade Sahebrao Punja |
| 5. | Shri Avhad Tulshram Tukaram |
| 6. | Shri Nikumbha Krishna Ramchandra |
| 7. | Shri Somase Shivaji Savliram |
| 8. | Shri Mahire Kedu Tukaram |
| 9. | Shri Aher Sudhakar Fakira |
| 10. | Shri Seriya Ramkishna Timlu |
| 11. | Shri Jadhav Prabhakar Yadav |
| 12. | Shri Chavan Santaram Deulal |
List of Casual Labourers
Electrical Department (Township) FNE/665
| 1. | Shri Sajid D. Shaikh |
| 2. | Dilip Ramdas jadhav |
| 3. | Abid Javed Shaikh |
| 4. | Shekhar Bharat Pawar |
| 5. | Yusuf Hanif Ansari |
| 6. | Shashikant Narayan Bhjalerao |
| 7. | Dnayaneshwar Ramdas Bhadke |
| 8. | Manoj Shivaji Kadam |
| 9. | Vikas Saveliram Pagare |
| 10. | Sunil Ramchandra Jagtap |
| 11. | Bajirao Dagadu Nikam |
| 12. | Baban Mahadeo Gaikwad |
Electrical Department (Factory) FNE/665
| 13. | Shri Dattu Hari Gangurde |
| 14. | Sanjay Dhokale |
Works & Services Depatt. (ST Plant/ Slumpwell) FWT/675
| 15. | Shri Mahendra Sambhaji Jadhav |
| 16. | Arun Shamrao Bagul |
| 17. | Deepak Shankar Gulve |
Works & Services Department (Zone-A) FWT/675
| 18. | Shri Bhagwan Dashrath Ahre |
| 19. | Jagdish Gokul Surywanshi |
| 20. | Ashik Bhaskar Gangurde |
| 21. | Ashok Raghunath Lokhande |
| 22. | Vasant Sakharam Jadhav |
| 23. | Shrawan Namdeo Ahire |
| 24. | Rajendra Popat Kardak |
| 25. | Rajendra Vishnu Shankhpal |
Works & Services Department (Zone-B) FWT/675
| 26. | Shri Ravindra Kachru Ahire |
| 27. | Bhagwan Ramchandra Karate |
| 28. | Dinkar Dada Parkhe |
| 29. | Manik Rambhau Lokhande |
| 30. | Ramesh Waman Shinde |
| 31. | Prakash Jivanna Badgare |
| 32. | Ashok Radhu Pandav |
| 33. | Sure Murlidhar Jadhav |
| 34. | Pramod Vasant Naik |
| 35. | Santosh Pandurang Lokhande |
| 36. | Ajay Pandurang Padangale |
| 37. | Laxman Dhondu Mahale |
| 38. | Somnath laxman More |
Works & Services Department- FW/675
Maintenance & Operation of Water Supply Valves in Factory Area
| 39. | Shri Devidas Uttam Shirsath |
| 40. | Ambadas Dashrath Jadhav |
| 41. | Subhash Somaru Yadav |
3. The names of the workmen against their serial numbers mentioned in the award dated 9/2/2015 may be read as mentioned in 'correct name' column.
List of Workmen
Stores Department
| Sr. no. as per award | Name as per award | Correct name |
| 6 | Vangurde Vasant Popat | Ganurde Vasant Popat |
| 8 | Survanshi Arun Popat | Syryavanshi Arun Popat |
| 14 | Nevkar Bharat Kishore | Nerkar Bharat Kishore |
| 15 | Kadam Dhatera Ganpat | Kadam Dattatraya Ganpat |
| 16 | Sonwane Bhausaheb Bajunath | Sonawane Bhaushet Bajunath |
| 21 | Bhandande Nivrutti Lohu | Bhadange Nivruti Lahanu |
| 22 | Nikam Bal Srishna | Nikam Bala Krishna |
| 26 | Kale Haricharnara Shankar | Kale Harishchandra Shankar |
| 29 | Loknar Bharat Bhaugi | Loknar Bharat Bhauji |
| 34 | Kshirasagar Bhaskar Chabu | Kshirsagar Bhaskar Chhabu |
| 35 | Dhore Badu Shankar | Dhotre Shankar Balasaheb |
| 36 | Lonkar Anil Dhanaji | Lonkar Balasaheb Dhanaji |
| 42 | Muradhanar Uttam Waman | Muradnar Uttam Waman |
| 44 | Sonwane Arun Kishan | Sonawane Arun Kisan |
| 52 | Rumaje Shantaram Ghagu | Rumane Shantaram D. |
| 83 | Kongari Vincent Marthin | Kongari Vicent Martin |
| 84 | More Pandurang Khanderan | More Pandurang Khanderao |
| 86 | Gaikwad Babu Sadgipan | Gaikwad Babu Sabhipan |
| 91 | Gagjap Dilip Nivaruti | Jagzap Dilip Niruuti |
| 93 | Tamble Dilip Popat | Tambe Dilip Popat |
| 96 | Chaure Naran Kashinath | Choure Narayan Kashinath |
| 101 | Battase Ashok Shankar | Battise Ashok Shankar |
| 102 | Loknar Balu Dhauji | Lokhande Balkrishna Baburao |
| 103 | Gumbade Somnath Kashinath | Gumbade Somnath Kisan |
| 106 | Rajkar Chandrakant Lala | Raikar Chandrant Lala |
| 122 | Gaikwad Chandrakant Gandha | Gaikwad Chandrakant Gedaji |
| 124 | Thair Shaikh Abadi | Thair Shaikh Abadin |
| 125 | Avhad Santosh | Avad Santosh |
| 126 | Wani Shehlala Arun | Wani Snehalata Arun |
| 127 | Jain Mahendrakumar Harkchand | Jain Mahendrakumar Harkchand |
| 132 | Jagtap Bharat Murlidhar | Jagzap Bharat Murlidhar |
| 134 | Gasavi Atmaram Ashruba | Gosavi Atamaram Ashruba |
| 141 | Jagtap Kailash Guman | Jagtap Kailas Guman |
| 144 | Barve Bandhu Ramchandra | Barve Balu Ramchandra |
| 147 | Lokhande Dilip Madhav | Lokhande Dilip Mahadev |
| 148 | Salve Sidharth Sadhu | Salave Sidharth Sandhu |
Horticulture Department
| Sr. no. as per award | Name as per award | Correct name |
| 2 | Chindu Dhondiram Bhongade | Ramdas Dhondiram Dhongade |
| 16 | Dinkar Monhram Potinde | Dinkar Motiram Potinde |
| 25 | Ravsaheb Rangnath Chandore | Ravsaheb Rangnath Chandre |
| 37 | Bhima Laxman Bendkule | Bhimrao Laxaman Bendkule |
| 41 | Anna Bhikaji Shardul | Ananda Bhikaji Shardul |
| 42 | Jagnnath Bhimaji Kore | Jagannath Bhimaji More |
| 48 | Ramdas Popat Watate | Ramdas Popat Watane |
| 56 | Zunabai Laxman Bhavan | Zunyabai Laxaman Bhavar |
| 68 | Sankar Murlidhar Ahre | Shankar Murlidhar Aher |
| 88 | Ramji Dhanaji Lonkar | Ramrao Dhanaji Loknar |
| 90 | Rakesh Narayan Vidhate | Ramchandra Narayan Vidhate |
Date : 01/02/2019
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-788.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ izca/ku enj Ms;jh] iViM+ xat] ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 64@@@@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.788.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 64 of 2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management Mother Dairy, Patpar Ganj, New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 08-04-2019
[No. L-42012/200/2014–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.1: ROOM No.511, DWARKA COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI – 110 075
ID No.64/2015 1) Shri Naveen Ranga s/o. Shri Jai Bhagwan E-690, Gali No.10, Vinod Nagar, Delhi and 57 others.
…Workmen[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3437
Versus
The Management of Mother Dairy, Patpar Ganj, New Delhi 110092.
…Management
AWARD
This award shall decide a reference which was made to this to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-42012/200/2014-IR(DU) dated 29.01.2015 (followed by corrigendum letter of even number dated 19/9/2016) under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:-
"Whether the workmen whose names are contained in the list entitled to entitled to reinstatement/ continuation in service at the same premises where they had been working till 1.10.2013 ?
2. Both parties were put to notice and the claimants/workmen Naveen Ranga and others filed their joint statement of claim with the averments that they were engaged by the Management on regular basis during the year 1999 & 2000 and exact date of joining and other particulars are given in the enclosed sheet. Service record of the workmen was unblemished and they were not issued any show cause notice or charge-sheet at any point of time. PF and ESI Contributions used to be deducted from their wages. It is alleged that for the services rendered by the workmen, they were paid wages for 7 months through cheque and for five months in cash . It is pleaded that the claimants were paid wages less than the wages under the Minimum Wages Act. It is also pleaded that when the claimants demanded that contributions towards PF and ESI be also deducted & deposited in respect of five months wages paid in cash, the Management as an ill-will terminated the services of the workmen/claimant illegally in October, 2013, without issuing any prior notice or paying notice/pay compensation or without issuing any charge sheet. Thereafter the claimants approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail. The workmen are unemployed since the date of their termination since October, 2013. Prayer has been made for their reinstatement into service with full back wages & all consequential benefits.
3. The statement of claim has been resisted by the Management who filed written statement and took preliminary objections that the workmen had not completed 240 days in continuous service in a year preceding the date of their alleged termination/cessation of service. It has been stated that Management being a law abiding establishment is engaged in the production, manufacture and supply of milk products especially ice-cream and it is located at Patparganj, Delhi. Demand for ice-cream in Delhi is seasonal and its demand is higher during summer months than other seasons. To meet the peak load demand of Ice cream manufacturing during summer time, depending upon the need, casual workers were engaged on rotation basis with break in between. They were engaged and paid under applicable provisions of law. As the volume of business grew and after assessing the demand during the lean season, some casual workers were regularized following the criteria of seniority, qualification, performance, punctuality and attendance etc. and last batch of such regularization was carried out in 2010. Due to persistent pressure from casual workers, the Management as a gesture of goodwill explored the possibility of rehabilitating those casual workers in Etawah Dairy, at Uttam Pradesh, by offering them permanent job and motive/intent of the Management was to absorb the casual workers in Etawah Dairy on permanent basis. The Management gave option to these casual workers to join the permanent employment at Etawah Dairy and some casual workers (17 in Numbers) had already joined there but the workmen/ claimants were unwilling to join the services and have filed the present claim. It is also stated that before the Conciliation Officer, the Management vide its letter dated 19/6/2014 had expressed its intention to accommodate the workmen in Etawah Dairy. It is further alleged that casual workers who are appointed as per exigencies of work can not claim to be in services of the Management as a matter of right. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
4. The claimant filed rejoinder, reiterating their own case as set up in the claim petition and denied the allegations as made in the written statement.
5. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed by this Tribunal vide order dated 7/1/2016 :-
(1) Whether the workman has completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of his termination and as such, not entitled to relief claimed ?
(2) Whether the workman herein was a seasonal and casual worker as alleged ? (3) Whether the workmen have abandoned services of the management voluntarily ? (4) As in terms of reference.
An additional issue No.3-A was framed as under on 8/3/2018 :-
"Whether present claim is barred by limitation ?
3438 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]6. The workmen /claimants examined themselves as WW1 to WW50 and tendered their evidence by way of affidavits Ex.WW1/A to Ex.WW50/A respectively. Each of them also filed and relied on their respective identity documents as also ESI cards
7. On the other hand, the Management examined one Shri Mani Shankar Jha, General Manager who filed his affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on the documents Ex.MW1/1 which is a copy of the letter dated 19/6/2014 which the Management had submitted to the Labour/Conciliation Officer, showing that the Management had expressed its intention for accommodating the claimants in Etawah Dairy.
8. I have heard Shri Mahesh Chandra, A/R for the claimants and Shri Lalit Bhasin, A/R for the Management. I have also gone through the records carefully. My findings on above issues are as follows.
Issue No.1 to 3
9. All these issues are taken up together as they can be conveniently disposed of by common discussion.
10. Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the Management & claimant, nor the claimants have completed 240 days of service in a calendar year, preceding to their alleged termination. It is also contended that the claimants were seasonal & casual workers. As such, provisions of Section 25-F of the Act are not applicable to the case in hand. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant/s to prove that he/she was in the employment of the Management and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year. Reliance has been placed on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Range Forest Officer Versus ST Hadimani, II (2002) SLT 154.
11. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimants submitted that the claimants were engaged by the Management in the year 1998 and their services were terminated at one go w.e.f.1/10/2013 abruptly without issuing any notice and without payment of any compensation in lieu of notice period despite the fact that the claimants had completed more than 240 days of their service. It was submitted that action of the Management in terminating the services of the claimants is unwarranted and illegal.
12. There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.
13. There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case However, as per written statement/reply filed by the Management, engagement of the claimants as casual workers is not in dispute. From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is evident that the claimants/ workmen were working as unskilled/ casual workers with the Management, though no letter of appointment was issued at the time of their engagement. The claimants have filed on record their respective ESIC cards issued to them. They have also filed on record a common list/statement containing their employee number, SAIF ID, date of joining, PF A/C No. and ESI Card No. besides their names and parentage etc. as Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW50/1. The said list which contains employee/s number and SAIF ID of the claimants/workmen besides containing their PF Account and ESI Account Numbers, has not been challenged by the Management. According to the workmen/claimant, their services were illegally terminated by the Management w.e.f.1/10/2013. The claimants have clarified in their cross examination that they were appointed through Employment Exchange but they do not possess any such letter. In connected case ID No. 68/2015 (Vijay Singh and another Vs. Mother Dairy) the Management had placed reliance on a document Ex.MW1/2 which is a copy of the reply dated 23/5/2008 filed by the Management herein before the Conciliation Officer. Perusal thereof shows that as against a dispute raised by the workmen Vijay Singh and others regarding regularization of nepotism/references workers and non-regularization of other workers, the Management had taken a plea in para 3 of the reply that due to increase in the base volume of production, some casual workers were regularized from time to time on the basis of seniority, qualification, performance, ability & attitude to take up new works/more responsibility; conduct & discipline and attendance & punctuality. It was also emphasized that casual workers were sourced through the Employment Exchange and hence the issue of regularizing the people of reference (Bhai/Bhatija) did not arise. This substantiates the version of the claimants that they were sponsored/sourced through the Employment Exchange for their engagement/appointment under the Management herein. Copy of the aforesaid reply dated 23/5/2008 is placed on record and marked as Ex.C-1.
14. In the light of the pleadings of the parties evidence adduced on record, it clearly proves that the workman/claimant worked as casual workers with the Management since the year 1999-2000 till 1st October, 2013 when their services were allegedly terminated by the Management. As such, this Tribunal is of the considered view that there existed relationship of employer–employee between the parties herein. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3439 Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/
contract of service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for
deciding whether or not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The
definition of workman also does not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or
a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from
which it can be inferred that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing
whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed
wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman."
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. Equally settled is the position of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the parties, then onus will shift upon the employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act or in accordance with Standing Order applicable to the establishment concerned.
15. The Management has not produced any document in the form of attendance sheet of the workmen herein to show that they had not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year. It is a matter of record that an application was moved on behalf of the claimants for production of certain documents/record vis-à-vis attendance and payment register; copy of ledger cash book and balance sheet; leave and bonus register pertaining to the claimants/ workers for the last five year, etc. etc.. No such document has been produced by the Management for the reasons best known to it. While admitting that the Management has not filed extract of attendance of claimants or proof of payment of wages, MW1 Mani Shakar Jha – sole witness examined by the Management volunteered that such record is maintained only for three years but he failed to cite any rule, regulation or office order to that effect. He also admitted that claimants were provided leave, ESI, EPF & Bonus for the period of their engagement. It is common knowledge that the Bonus is paid to a worker if he is in service of the Management for the last one year. In these circumstances, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the Management for non production of important documents vis-à-vis complete attendance register/casual workers' charts pertaining to the claimants herein and payment of wage/bonus register etc. prior to the their termination w.e.f. 1/10/2013 and it is to be held that the workmen/claimants though engaged as casual/temporary workers had completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of their termination.
16. The Management has taken a plea in para 11 of the written statement that the workmen themselves had not joined work and voluntarily abstained from and abandoned the work despite the fact that Management had already offered permanent job to the workman at Etawah Dairy Unit ((UP). It may be noted that simply it is a vague plea and no details have been given as to during which period the claimants/workmen remained absent from duty unauthorisedly. Moreover, no such document/proof has been produced on record. Even if it is assumed for the sake of arguments that the workmen/claimants herein abstained from work and abandoned the job, in that eventuality also it was incumbent upon the Management to issue call back notice to the claimants. Nothing of the sort has been done by the Management. As such, it can not be concluded that the workmen /claimants had themselves abandoned services voluntarily. Moreover, the offer of permanent job to the workmen at Etawah Dairy Unit (UP) was given by the Management only after the workmen had approached the Conciliation Officer vide reply/letter dated 19/6/2014 (Ex.MW1/1). It is pertinent to mention here that as per the version of MW1 Etawah Dairy at Uttar Pradesh was a new project of the Management. It appears that the Management wanted to transfer the workmen/claimants malafide from Delhi to Etawah (UP), without issuing any transfer/absorption orders and without enhancing the wages of the workers who were residing and serving with the Management at its Patparganj Plant/industrial unit. In my view, this was unfair labour practice on the part of the Management. Needless to mention here that transferring a workman malafide from one place to another, under the guise of following management policy and/or, employing workmen as "badlis", casuals or temporaries and to continue them as such for years, with the object of depriving them of the status & privileges of permanent workmen amounts to unfair labour practice as provided under Section 2(ra) read with Fifth Schedule of the Act.
17. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, this Tribunal has no hesitation to decide all these issues against the Management and in favour of the claimants.
Issue No.3-A
18. Management has taken a misconceived objection that a dispute under Section 2-A of the Act can only be raised by an individual workman on account of his dismissal, discharge, retrenchment etc. and collective claim purportedly filed on behalf of 58 workmen/claimants is not maintainable. It is pertinent to mention that this is not a claim petition filed under Section 2-A of the Act, rather it is a reference under Section 10 of the Act. The services of the claimants/workmen herein were terminated w.e.f.1st October, 2013 and thereafter the claimants approached the Conciliation Officer. As mentioned above, reference to this Tribunal was made by the Appropriate Government vide3440 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] letter dated 29/1/2015. Once a reference is made by the Appropriate Government, same is required to be decided on merits. There is nothing on record to suggest that claim petition is barred by limitation. As such, this issue decided in favour of the claimants and against the Management.
Issue No. 4
19. It is the case of the claimants that their services were terminated w.e.f.1st October, 2013, without issuing any notice or without any notice pay/compensation. The Management has taken a plea that since the workmen were just casual workmen, provisions of Section 25-F of the Act has no application in respect of casual workmen/claimants. Admittedly, no notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given to the claimants by the Management and as such termination of these claimants/workmen by the Management was in violation of provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. Even if it is assumed for the sake of arguments that the claimants/workmen were serving with the Management casual/temporary workers, in that eventuality also it was imperative upon the Management to comply with the provisions of Section 25-G of the Act i.e. to say to apply the principle of "last in, first out/go" (LIFO method) while retrenching/terminating the services of the workmen concerned. For the purpose of applying the aforesaid principle as required under Section 25-G of the Act, the Management was required to maintain a list of all such workers whether employed on a daily wage basis or otherwise for short periods of time, so as to ascertain as to who (workman) was/is required to be retrenched first and so on if circumstances so warrant. The Management has not filed on record any list of such casual/temporary workers to show that the claimants/workmen herein were "engaged lastly" and that is why they were retrenched as "first goers" and that no worker/s junior to the claimant was/is still in service. These circumstances lead this Tribunal to draw adverse inference against the Management for failing to comply with the provisions of Section 25-G of the Act, inasmuch as the Management has not advanced any cogent or tangible reason for terminating/ retrenching the services of the workmen herein. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that since the Management has not complied with the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, the action of the Management in terminating the services of 57 Nos. of workmen (whose particulars are mentioned in the list annexed with the reference which list is now marked as Ex.C-2) w.e.f. 1/102013, should be held to be illegal and unjustified. It is ordered accordingly.
20. Now the crucial question for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service. The claimant in the pleading as well as in their testimony have stated that they are unemployed since after their termination. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimants are gainfully employed somewhere else or that they are in a position to make their both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimants are doing some intermittent or adhoc work to make their both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment.
21. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case "Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya" reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :
"The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule.
ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments."
22. The Hon'ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of termination of a workman's service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).
23. A Bench of three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v. Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3441 away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the workmen alongwith payment of back wages.
24. However, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh, reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-
"8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year."
25. Yet in another latest case of Bholanath Lal and others Vs. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd., Manu/DE/1922/2018 (decided on 10/5/2018), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while considering the question of illegal termination and reinstatement held as under :-
"The cases in which the competent court or tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provisions and/or the principles of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the court or tribunal concerned will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. In such cases, the superior courts should not exercise power under Article 226 or 136 of the Constitution and interfere with the award passed by the Labour Court, etc. merely because there is a possibility of forming a different opinion on the entitlement of the employee/workman to get full back wages or the employer's obligation to pay the same The courts must always keep in view that that in the cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee./workman and there is no justification to give a premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee/ workman his dues in the form of full back wages."
A similar view has been taken in the case of Delhi Jal Board Vs. Vimal Kumar (decided on 5-4-2018) MANU/de/1322/2018 wherein service of a casual driver was terminated without any notice or payment of one month's salary in lieu of such notice. The Industrial Tribunal answering the reference held the action of the management to be illegal and in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. The Award was upheld by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by observing as under :-
"In view of the above discussion, I am unable to discern any illegality or infirmity in the impugned Award, dated 29th May, 2003, of the Labour Court, to the extent that it holds the termination of the services of the respondent, by the petitioner, to be illegal and unlawful. I am entirely in agreement with the finding, of the Labour Court, that the services of the respondent were retrenched in violation of Section 25-F of the ID Act and that, therefore, he was entitled to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. In view of the fact that going by the age of the respondent as disclosed in the counter affidavit filed before this Court, he would, today, be only 50 years of age, and also in view of the fact that the termination of his services as SCM Driver was not on account of any deficiency or shortcoming detected in the manner of discharge by the respondent, of his duties as such, I am of the opinion, that the facts of the present case, do not warrant any interference with the direction, of the Labour Court, to the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service with the benefit of continuity of service. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to reinstate the respondent in service forthwith.
Inasmuch as the respondent has not been rendering any service to the petitioner since the date of his termination, however, the back wages payable to the respondent would be limited to 50 per cent of the wages which he would have drawn he had continued to serve the petitioner….."
26. Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimants were performing duty for the last many years, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimants herein are entitled for reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, inasmuch as termination of the claimants/workmen is per-se illegal and the claimants/workmen are not gainfully employed anywhere since after their termination by the Management. Award is passed accordingly.
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer3442 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-789.— vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ izca/ku enj Ms;jh] iViM+ xat] ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 68@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08@04@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.789.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 68/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No.1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Management Mother Dairy, Patpar Ganj, New Delhi & Others and their workmen, which were received by the Central Government on 08/04-2019
[No. L-42011/197/2014–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER : CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.1, NEW DELHI
ID No. 68/2015
1) Shri Vijay Singh s/o. late Shri Bhagirath,
2) Shri Chotan Kumar Mishra, s/o. Shri Gorakh Mishra, H.No.74, Hasanpur Village IP Extn. Near Shani Sai Mandir, Delhi 110092. …Workmen
Versus
The Management of Mother Dairy, Patpar Ganj, New Delhi-110092. …Management
AWARD
This award shall decide a reference which was made to this Tribunal by the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-42011/197/2014/IR(DU) dated 29.01.2015 (followed by corrigendum letter dated 5/2/2015) under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:-
"Whether the workman Shri Vijay Singh and Chotan Kumar entitled to reinstatement by the employer ? If yes, with effect from which date ? If not, to what relief are they entitled to ?
2. Both parties were put to notice and the claimants/workmen Vijay Singh and Chotan Kumar filed their joint statement of claim with the averments that they were engaged by the Management as unskilled workers on regular basis on 23/6/1998 and 11/5/1998 respectively. Service record of the workmen was unblemished and they were not issued any show cause notice or charge-sheet at any point of time. PF and ESI Contributions used to be deducted from their wages. It is alleged that for the services rendered by the workmen, they were paid wages for 7 months through cheque and for five months in cash . It is pleaded that the claimants were paid wages less than the wages under the Minimum Wages Act. It is also pleaded that when the claimants demanded that contributions towards PF and ESI be also deducted & deposited in respect of five months wages paid in cash, the Management as an ill-will terminated the services of the workmen/claimant illegally on 2/1/2009, without issuing any prior notice or paying notice/pay compensation or without issuing any charge sheet. Thereafter the claimants approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail. The workmen are unemployed[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3443 since the date of their termination w.e.f. 2/01/2009. Prayer has been made for their reinstatement into service with full back wages & all consequential benefits.
3. The statement of claim has been resisted by the Management who filed written statement and took preliminary objections that the workmen had not completed 240 days in continuous service in a year preceding the date of their alleged termination/cessation of service. It is also stated that the since the workmen were admittedly casual workers, Section 25-F of the Act has no application in respect of casual workmen. It is alleged that the workmen/claimants were not called for re-engagement in the Management establishment since 2007 for job of casual nature, due to their chronic and unauthorized absenteeism record and further because the conduct of both the workmen was highly unsatisfactory. It is also alleged that in the year 2009, an FIR was lodged by the Management against both the claimants to the SHO of P.S.Mandawali on account of forceful entry by the workmen/claimants in the premises of Mother Dairy Staff colony and for rash driving. It is further alleged that casual workers who are appointed as per exigencies of work can not claim to be in services of the Management as a matter of right. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
4. The claimant filed rejoinder, reiterating his own case as set up in the claim petition and denied the allegations as made in the written statement.
5. On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed by this Tribunal vide order dated 7/1/2016 :-
(1) Whether the workman has completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of his termination and as such, not entitle4d to relief claimed ?
(2) Whether the workman herein was a seasonal and casual worker as alleged ? (3) Whether the workmen have abandoned services in the management voluntarily ? (4) As in terms of reference.
6. The workmen /claimants examined themselves as WW1 & WW2 and tendered their evidence by way of affidavits Ex.WW1/A & Ex.WW2/A respectively. They filed on their respective identity documents including ESI cards as Ex.WW1/1 & Ex.WW1/2 and Ex.WW2/1 and Ex.WW2/2.
7. On the other hand, the Management examined one Shri Mani Shankar Jha, General Manager who filed his affidavit Ex.MW1/A and relied on the documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/5.
8. I have heard Shri Mahesh Chandra, A/R for the claimants and Shri Lalit Bhasin, A/R for the Management. I have also gone through the records carefully. My findings on above issues are as follows.
Issue No.1 to 3
9. All these issues are taken up together as they can be conveniently disposed of by common discussion.
10. Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Management strongly contended that there is no relationship of employer and employee between the Management & claimant, nor the claimants have completed 240 days of service in a calendar year, preceding to their alleged termination. It is also contended that the claimants were seasonal & casual workers. As such, provisions of Section 25-F of the Act are not applicable to the case in hand. It was also contended that onus is also upon the claimant/s to prove that he/she was in the employment of the Management and has completed more than 240 days in a calendar year. Reliance has been placed on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Range Forest Officer Versus ST Hadimani, II (2002) SLT 154.
11. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Claimants submitted that the claimants were engaged by the Management in the year 1998 and their services were terminated at one go on 2/1/2009 abruptly without issuing any notice and without payment of any compensation in lieu of notice period despite the fact that the claimants had completed more than 240 days of their service. It was submitted that action of the Management in terminating the services of the claimants is unwarranted and illegal.
12- There is no dispute about preposition of law that onus to prove that claimant was in the employment of Management is always on the workman/claimant and it is for the workman to adduce evidence to prove factum of her employment with the Management Bank. Such evidence may be in form of receipt of salary or wages for 240 days or record of his/her appointment or engagement for that year to show that he/she has worked with the employer for 240 days or more in a Calendar year. In this regard, reference may be made to Batala Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sowaran Singh, (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 481 as well as Director Fisheries Terminated Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Gavda (2012) 1 SCC 47.
13. There is hardly any dispute with the preposition of law as propounded in the aforesaid case. However, as per written statement/reply filed by the Management, engagement of the claimants as casual workers is not in dispute. From the pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced on record, it is evident that the claimants/workmen were working as unskilled/ casual workers with the Management, though no letter of appointment was issued at the time of their engagement. The claimants have filed on record ESIC cards issued to them in March, 2003. According to the workmen/claimant, their services were illegally terminated by the Management with effect from 2/1/2009. The claimants have clarified in their cross examination that they were appointed through Employment Exchange but they do3444 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] not possess any such letter. Perusal of the record especially the document Ex.MW1/2 which is copy of the reply dated 23/5/2008 given by the Management before the Conciliation Officer shows that as against a dispute raised by the workmen Vijay Singh and others regarding regularization of nepotism/references workers and non-regularization of other workers, the Management had taken a plea in para 3 of the reply that due to increase in the base volume of production, some casual workers were regularized from time to time on the basis of seniority, qualification, performance, ability & attitude to take up new works/more responsibility; conduct & discipline and attendance & punctuality. It was also emphasized that casual workers were sourced through the Employment Exchange and hence the issue of regularizing the people of reference (Bhai/Bhatija) did not arise. This substantiate the version of the claimants that they were sponsored/sourced through the Employment Exchange for their engagement/appointment under the Management herein.
14. In the written statement, the Management has contended that the workmen/claimants were not called for re- engagement in the Management establishment since 2007 for job of casual nature, due to their chronic and unauthorized absenteeism record and further because the conduct of both the workmen was highly unsatisfactory. However, this contention of the Management does not hold good on the face of document Ex.MW1/1 relied upon by the Management which is copy of the complaint dated 25/1/2009 made by it to the SHO of PS Mandawali, wherein it has been stated that two temporary workers namely Shri Vijay Singh s/o.Shri Bhagirath Singh and Sri Chouttan Kr. Mishra s/o. Sri Gorakh Mishra alongwith one unknown person had forcefully entered into the premises of Mother Dairy Staff colony. This document Ex.MW1/1 itself goes to show that in January, 2009 also the claimants were the temporary workers of the Management.
15. In the light of the evidence adduced on record, it clearly proves that there existed relationship of employer– employee between the parties herein. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/
contract of service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for
deciding whether or not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The
definition of workman also does not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or
a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from
which it can be inferred that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing
whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed
wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman."
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. Equally settled is the position of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the parties, then onus will shift upon the employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act or in accordance with Standing Order applicable to the establishment concerned.
16. The Management has not produced any document in the form of attendance sheet of the workmen herein to show that they had not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year. It is a matter of record that an application was moved on behalf of the claimants for production of certain documents/record vis-à-vis attendance and payment register; copy of ledger cash book and balance sheet; leave and bonus register pertaining to the claimants/ workers for the last five year, etc. etc.. No such document has been produced by the Management for the reasons best known to it. While admitting that the Management has not filed extract of attendance of claimants or proof of payment of wages, MW1 Mani Shakar Jha – sole witness examined by the Management volunteered that such record is maintained only for three years but he failed to cite any rule, regulation or office order to that effect. In these circumstances, adverse inference is required to be drawn against the Management for non production of important documents vis-à-vis complete attendance register/casual workers' charts pertaining to the claimants herein and payment of wage/bonus register etc. prior to the their termination on 20/1/2009 and it is to be held that the workmen/claimants though engaged as casual/temporary workers had completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding the date of their termination.
17. The Management has taken a plea that services of the workmen/claimants were not terminated by the Management rather it was a case of abandonment of services due to unauthorized absence of the workmen from duty. It may be noted that simply it is a vague plea and no details have been given as to during which period the claimants/workmen remained absence from duty unauthorisedly. Moreover, no such document/proof has been produced on record. Even if it is assumed for the sake of arguments that the workmen/claimants herein were absent from duty unauthorisedly, in that eventuality also it was incumbent upon the Management to issue call back notice to the claimants. Nothing of the sort has been done by the Management. As such, it can not be concluded that the workmen /claimants had themselves abandoned services volunatarily.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 344518. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, this Tribunal has no hestitation to decide all these issues against the Management and in favour of the claimants.
Issue No.4
19. It is the case of the claimants that their services were terminated without issuing any notice or without any notice pay/compensation. The Management has taken a plea that since the workmen were just casual workmen, provisions of Section 25-F of the Act has no application in respect of casual workmen/claimants. Admittedly, no notice or compensation in lieu of notice period was given to the claimants by the Management and as such termination of these claimants/workmen by the Management was in violation of provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. Even if it is assumed for the sake of arguments that the claimants/workmen were serving with the Management casual/temporary workers, in that eventuality also it was imperative upon the Management to comply with the provisions of Section 25-G of the Act i.e. to say to apply the principle of "last in, first out/go" (LIFO method) while retrenching/terminating the services of the workmen concerned. For the purpose of applying the aforesaid principle as required under Section 25-G of the Act, the Management was required to maintain a list of all such workers whether employed on a daily wage basis or otherwise for short periods of time, so as to ascertain as to who (workman) was/is required to be retrenched first and so on if circumstances so warrant. The Management has not filed on record any list of such casual/temporary workers to show that the claimants/workmen herein were "engaged lastly" and that is why they were retrenched as "first goers" and that no worker/s junior to the claimant was/is still in service. These circumstances lead this Tribunal to draw adverse inference against the Management for failing to comply with the provisions of Section 25-G of the Act, inasmuch as the Management has not advanced any cogent or tangible reason for terminating/ retrenching the services of the workmen herein. In these circumstances, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that since the Management has not complied with the provisions of Section 25-F and 25-G of the Act, the action of the Management in terminating the services of workman w.e.f. 2/1/2009 should be held to be illegal and unjustified.
20. Now the crucial question for consideration is whether the claimant is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service. The claimant in the pleading as well as in their testimony have stated that they are unemployed since after their termination. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimants are gainfully employed somewhere else or that they are in a position to make their both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimants are doing some intermittent or adhoc work to make their both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment.
21. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case "Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya" reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :
"The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :
(i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule.
(ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments."
22. The Hon'ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of termination of a workman's service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).
23. A Bench of three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v. Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the3446 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the workmen alongwith payment of back wages.
24. However, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh, reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-
"8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year."
25. Yet in another latest case of Bholanath Lal and others Vs. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd., Manu/DE/1922/2018 (decided on 10/5/2018), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while considering the question of illegal termination and reinstatement held as under :-
"The cases in which the competent court or tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provisions and/or the principles of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the court or tribunal concerned will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. In such cases, the superior courts should not exercise power under Article 226 or 136 of the Constitution and interfere with the award passed by the Labour Court, etc. merely because there is a possibility of forming a different opinion on the entitlement of the employee/workman to get full back wages or the employer's obligation to pay the same The courts must always keep in view that that in the cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee./workman and there is no justification to give a premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee/ workman his dues in the form of full back wages."
A similar view has been taken in the case of Delhi Jal Board Vs. Vimal Kumar (decided on 5-4-2018) MANU/de/1322/2018 wherein service of a casual driver was terminated without any notice or payment of one month's salary in lieu of such notice. The Industrial Tribunal answering the reference held the action of the management to be illegal and in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. The Award was upheld by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by observing as under :-
"In view of the above discussion, I am unable to discern any illegality or infirmity in the impugned Award, dated 29th May, 2003, of the Labour Court, to the extent that it holds the termination of the services of the respondent, by the petitioner, to be illegal and unlawful. I am entirely in agreement with the finding, of the Labour Court, that the services of the respondent were retrenched in violation of Section 25-F of the ID Act and that, therefore, he was entitled to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. In view of the fact that going by the age of the respondent as disclosed in the counter affidavit filed before this Court, he would, today, be only 50 years of age, and also in view of the fact that the termination of his services as SCM Driver was not on account of any deficiency or shortcoming detected in the manner of discharge by the respondent, of his duties as such, I am of the opinion, that the facts of the present case, do not warrant any interference with the direction, of the Labour Court, to the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service with the benefit of continuity of service. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to reinstate the respondent in service forthwith.
Inasmuch as the respondent has not been rendering any service to the petitioner since the date of his termination, however, the back wages payable to the respondent would be limited to 50 per cent of the wages which he would have drawn he had continued to serve the petitioner….."
26. Having regard to the legal position as discussed above, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimants herein are entitled for reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, inasmuch as termination of the claimants/workmen is per-se illegal and the claimants/workmen are not gainfully employed anywhere since after their termination by the Management.
Award is passed accordingly.
Date : 04.04.2019
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3447
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-790.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ czkap eSustj] ;l cSad] djksy ckx ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 56@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11@04@2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O. 790.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 56/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Branch Manager, Yes Bank, Karol Bagh, New Delhi & Others and their workmen, which were received by the Central Government on 11/04-2019
[No. L-42011/118/2011–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No.1, NEW DELHI
ID No.56/2017
Shri Surya Bhan Singh, through Delhi Karamchari Sang (Regd.) W-4, in front of Bus Depot, Govindpuri, New Delhi – 110 019
…Workman
Versus
(i) Yes Bank, through
The Branch Manager, 3380, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi – 110 005 (ii) M/s Fire Ball Securitas and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.,
Through Brig. Vinod Raizada, President, 1899, Uday Chand Marg, Kotla Mubarakpur, South Extension Part I, Delhi – 110 003
…Management
AWARD
Reference under Clause (d) of Sub Section(1) and sub-section 2(A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was received from the appropriate Government vide letter No.L-42011/118/2011-IR(DU) dated 20.01.2012 for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which is as under:
"Whether the claim of the workman Shri Surya Bhan Singh for reinstatement with effect from 04.11.2015 in the establishment of management No.1, i.e. Yes Bank through the management No.2, i.e. M/s Fire Ball Securities and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. is legal and/or justified? If yes, what relief is he entitled to and what directions are necessary in this respect?"3448 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. Claim statement was filed on behalf of Shri Surya Bhan Singh (in short the workman ) averring therein that the workman was appointed by M/s Fireball Securitas and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (in short management No.2) to work in the premises of Yes Bank (in short management No.1) as Security Guard on 07.12.2013 and his last drawn wages was Rs.10,400.00 per month. No appointment letter was issued to him. The workman worked continuously with management No.2 till he was illegally terminated on 04.11.2015, in total violation of provisions of Section 25-F and G of the Act. Management No.2 took 12 hours of work per day but no overtime wages was paid. The workman was also deprived of legal facilities like Casual leave, pay slip, leave book, house rent allowance, overtime wages yearly increment etc., though presence of the workman was noted in the attendance register and wages was paid on the wages register. The workman, after getting his leave sanctioned with effect from 16.10.2015 to 05.11.2015, left for his native place. On his return, the workman went to the office of management No. 2 but instead of allowing him to join duties, pressurized him to tender his resignation. On his refusal to do so, the bouncer of management No.2 forcefully obtained his signatures on the resignation letter and a complaint to this effect has been filed by the claimant with PS Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi. Demand notice was sent to management No.2 on 06.11.2015 but no reply was given by them. The workman is unemployed since the date of his termination. Finally, it has been prayed that he may be reinstated in service with full back wages.
3. Claim was demurred by management No. 1, taking various preliminary objections inter alia of the claim being devoid of merits, absence of employer-employee relationship between the parties and that no relief is being sought from them. On merits, the management has denied all the material averments contained in the statement of claim.
4. Statement of defence was also filed on behalf of management No.2 wherein preliminary objections have been taken to the effect that there is no cause of action as the workman has not been terminated by them, the dispute being not maintainable as he has joined another establishment, concealment of material facts etc. However, the management has admitted the facts to the extent of appointment of the claimant and his last drawn salary. However, the management has specifically and vehemently denied that they have illegally terminated the workman. it is averred that the workman had himself resigned. Management No.2 has specifically denied the other material averments contained in the statement of claim.
5. Workman filed rejoinder to the written statement filed by the managements, reasserting the stand taken by him in his statement of claim.
6. Based on the pleadings of the parties, vide order dated 08.03.2019, this Tribunal framed the following issues and the case was listed for evidence of the workman:
(i) Whether reference is not legally maintainable in view of the preliminary objections?
(ii) In terms of reference
7. Thereafter, an application was moved on behalf of management No.1 for deletion of their name from the array of parties. While hearing the parties on the said application, it transpired that the matter could be amicable reconciled and efforts were made for settling the matter.
8. Good sense prevailed and the dispute was settled between the parties amicably. In view of the fact that the parties had settled their dispute amicably, there remains no occasion to adjudicate the issues referred above.
9. Workman made a statement to the effect that he has no objection if management No.2 gives him fresh employment on the post of security guard and was willing to accept compensation amount of Rs.50,000.00 towards full and final settlement of his claims/relief sought and thereafter his claim would stand satisfied. Shri Sunil Saha, authorized representative of management No.2, made a statement that under instructions of management No.2 and without prejudice to its rights, they are willing to give fresh engagement/employment to the workman and would pay a sum of 50,000.00 (rupees forty thousand by cheque and Rs. 10000.00 in cash ) in full and final settlement of all the claims, including back wages. Cheque No.782436 dated 13.03.2019 for Rs.40,000.00 (Ex.C-1) favouring the workman and Movement order giving fresh appointment on the post of Security Guard (Ex.C-2) shall form integral part of this award. Workman has also received Rs.10,000.00 in cash and now he does not have any surviving dispute with any of the managements and the matter has been disposed of amicably between the parties. Declaration made by the workman as well as Shri Sunil Saha, A/R for management No.2 shall also form integral part of the award. An award is, accordingly, passed. It be sent to the appropriate Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
A.C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
Dated : 9-4-2019[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3449
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-791.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd Hkkjrh; izkS|ksfxdh laLFkku ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 79@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08@03@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.791.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 79/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 08.03.2019.
[No. L-42025/03/2019–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX : NEW DELHI
ID No. 79/2015
Shri Jitender Kumar s/o. late Shri Kesari Nandan, r/o. M-416, Third Floor, JJ Colony, Shakurpur, New Delhi -34. …Workman
Versus
1. The Director,
Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016.
2. The Registrar (SA),
Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016. …Management
AWARD
This is a claim filed directly by the Workman/claimant Jitender Kumar under Section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), with the averments that his father Shri Kesari Nandan was a permanent employee under the employment of Management on the post of Junior Technical Superintendent in the pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- and he died on 7/9/2007 during his service tenure. After his sudden demise, Smt. Urmila Devi –mother of the claimant/workman requested the Management for appointment of her son Jitender Kumar on compassionate grounds. After great efforts, the claimant Jitender Kumar was appointed to the post of Masalchi in Students Affairs Section in Jwalamukhi Hostel, IIT on temporary and contractual basis w.e.f. 8/1/2008 to 7/7/2008 at a consolidated salary of Rs.4000/- per month. His employment was extended to different posts by issuing letters dated 21/7/2008, 5/2/2009, 20/1/10, 6/5/2011, 13/10/2011, 18/10/2011, 9/2/2012, 1/5/2012 and 4/5/2012 and lastly he was given the job of Junior Assistant/Store Keeper vide letter dated 24/12/2012 and he worked till 28/2/2013. Although the workman/ claimant worked with utmost dedication and hard work from 8/1/2008 to 28/2/2013, yet the Management declined to make him permanent on the job and terminated his services in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act which amounted to unfair labour practice & victimization. The claimant got sent a legal notice dated 28/8/2013 but to no response. A demand notice dated 22/2/2014 was sent through post but the Management did not bother to respond. It is pleaded that the workman is unemployed since the date of his illegal termination, Thereafter the claimant approached the Conciliation Officer but to no avail due to adamant attitude of the Management and hence, the Conciliation Officer issued failure report. Prayer has been made for reinstatement of the claimant with full back wages and continuity of services with all consequential benefits.
3450 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]2. The claim petition has been resisted by the Management who filed written statement & took preliminary objections that the claimant was not qualified to be appointed even on temporary basis against any regular post. He himself had applied for the post of MASALCHI in the Hostel of the Management and he was appointed. On merits, it is stated that the workman had worked purely on temporary basis as a Multi-Tasking Employee under the Board for Hostel Management and his initial appointment was w.e.f. 8/1/2008 to 7/7/2008. Terms & conditions of his serviced and rules of discipline were contained in the BHM Rules & Regulations and his employment had lastly expired on 28/2/2013 with breaks and same was not renewed by Board for Hostel Management due to his irresponsible. Unreliable and unpredictable working behavior. While denying that the workman was given the job of Junior Assistant/Store Keeper, it has been reiterated that the workman worked as Multi Tasking Employee in the student Affairs Section and his services were taken in Hostel to assist Caretakers. Other averments made by the claimant have been denied. As regards termination, it has been stated that the workman/.claimant was a contractual labour and his contract had expired on 28/2/2013. The workman/claimant never worked with sincerely. He deserted his duty twice without any information and remained unauthorized absence from duty w.e.f. 6/12/2010 to 2/2/2011 for which a warning was issued to him vide letter dated 27/31-1-2011. Thereafter he against the left the job on 6/2/2011 without information and he was served with a warning vide letter dated 10/2/2011. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
3. Against this factual background, this Tribunal on the pleadings of the parties, framed following issues on 10/03/2014 :-
(1) Whether termination of services is in violation of principle of natural justice and provisions of Section 25-F of the ID Act and is null & void as alleged ?
(2) Whether the workman is entitled for reinstatement with fujll back wages, as alleged ? (3) Whether the claim filed is not maintainable, as alleged ?
4. The Claimant in support of his case examined herself as W.W.1 and tendered his affidavit Ex.WW1/A alongwith documents Ex.WW1/1 to WW1/9.
5. On the other hand, the Management in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Mukesh Chand, Assistant Registrar as MW1 who tendered his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.MW1/A alongwith documents Ex.MW1/1 & Ex.MW1/2.
6. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced on behalf of the parties.
Issue No.1 to 3
7. All these issues are taken up together as the same can be disposed of together by a common discussion.
8. Testimony of the claimant vide affidavit Ex.WW1/A is in line with the averments made in the claim petition. It is the case of the claimant that he was appointed on compassionate grounds after the death of his father Shri Kesari Nandan. Although it is manifest from the documents Ex.WW1/1 and Ex.WW1/2 that Shri Kesari Nandan was working with the Management as Mechnic Work-charge (EC No.70116), however the claimant has not filed on record any document to substantiate his claim that he was appointed on compassionate ground. The Management has specifically pleaded that the claimant/workman had himself applied for the post of MASALCHI in the Hostel of the Management and he was appointed as such but not on compassionate grounds. With reference to the application dated 14/1/2008 of Smt. Urmila Devi (widow of late Shri Kesari Nandan) regarding appointment of her son on compassionate grounds, the Management vide letter Ex.WW1/3 had informed that her son Mr. Jitender Kumar has already got an appointment in BHM, IIT, Delhi. It is also evident from the document Ex. MW1/W-1 (dated 19-10-2007) that the Management had conveyed Smt. Urmila –widow of late Shri Kesari Nandan that her request dated 25/7/2007 for appointment of her son Shri Jiteneder Kumar on compassionate ground has been considered by the Competent Authority but the same has not been acceded to. Be that as it may, it is manifest from para 2 of the reply/written statement, on merits that the claimant worked with the Management as Multi-Tasking employee, on temporary basis w.e.f. 8/1/2008 to 28/2/2013 with breaks. Management has just filed on record copy of the order dated 8/1/2008 (Ex.MW1/1) to show that the appointment of the claimant was purely on contractual basis w.e.f. 8/1/2008 to 7/7/2008. MW1 Shri Mukesh Chand – witness of the Management has admitted that the claimant was issued several appointment letters by the Management from 2008 to 2013. Copies of such appointment letters must be in the possession of the Management but it failed to file the same on record for the reasons best known to it. Since the claimant worked with the Management from the year 2008 to 2013, it can be inferred that the claimant was in continuous service of the Management and had completed 240 days in a calendar year prior to his alleged termination/dismissal from duty on 28/2/2013. To my mind, there existed relationship of employer–employee between the parties herein. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Courtt 2532, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3451make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There
is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on
regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary,
part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a
workman."
It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act. Equally settled is the position of law that when relationship of employer-employee stands proved between the parties, then onus will shift upon the employer/management to show that the claimant has not worked for 240 days or more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant was terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act or in accordance with Standing Order applicable to the establishment concerned.
9. Management has not filed on record any document to show that the claimant did not work for 240 days or more in a calendar year or that the services of the claimant were terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act or in accordance with Standing Order applicable to the establishment concerned. Even the Management has not filed on record copies of the letters, containing terms & conditions of extension of service of the claimant from time to time, so as to show that terms & conditions of service were fully complied with or that such retrenchment covered under the provisions of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Act. Although the Management has specifically alleged that the workman/claimant never worked with sincerity and that is why warning letters dated 27/31-1-2011 and 10/2/2011 were issued to him, however no such letters have been filed on record by the Management for the reasons best known to it.
10. This Tribunal has already held that there existed relationship of employer-employee between the Management and the claimant herein and further that, claimant worked with the Management for a period of 240 days or more in a calendar year. Admittedly, the Management has not issued any notice to the claimant before ordering his termination, nor has paid one month's salary in lieu of such notice as required under Section 25-F of the Act. I may mention that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act which provides for conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen, are absolute and inexorable and it reads as under :-
"25-F : Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen –
No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until –
(a) The workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice;
(b) The workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed years of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months; and
(c) Notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette."
The above provision makes it clear that the employer is required to give notice to the appropriate Government apart-from giving one month's notice in writing or one month's wages in lieu of the notice and payment of retrenchment compensation to the concerned workman.
11. There is long line of decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court as well as of various High Courts that provisions of Section 25-F of the Act are mandatory in nature and termination of the workman from services in derogation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act will render whole action of the Management Bank to be illegal and wrong under the law. As such, it is held that action of the Management in terminating/disengaging the services of the claimant herein was unjustified and illegal.
12. Now the residual question arises for consideration is whether the claimant/work is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. The Management has not discharged or terminated the services of the claimant on the ground that his performance was unsatisfactory or that he was on probation or that he breached any rule or regulation of the establishment. The claimant was working as Multi Tasking official which job is/was of regular and perennial nature, inasmuch as he was employed with the Management establishment on 8/1/2008 and was terminated from service without issuing any termination letter on 28/2/2013. There is pleading in the claim petition as well as evidence to the effect that the workman is unemployed since the day of her termination and has got no source of her livelihood.. The Management has not adduced any evidence to show that the claimant is gainfully employed somewhere else or that she is in a position to make her both ends meet by doing any work. Even if it is assumed that the claimant is doing some intermittent or ad-hoc work to make his both ends meet, that would not itself amount to gainful employment.
3452 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]13. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case "Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya" reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under :
"The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are :
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule.
ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman wads gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she wads drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments."
14. The Hon'ble Apex Court also held that different expressions are used for describing the consequence of termination of a workman's service/employment/engagement by way of retrenchment without complying with the mandate of Section 25F of the Act. Sometimes it has been termed as ab initio void, sometimes as illegal per se, sometime as nullity and sometimes as non est. Leaving aside the legal semantics, we have no hesitation to hold that termination of service of an employee by way of retrenchment without complying with the requirement of giving one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof and compensation in terms of Section 25F (a) and (b) has the effect of rendering the action of the employer and nullity and the employee is entitled to continue in employment as if his service was not terminated. (Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No.1 Panipat (2010) 5 SCC 497).
15. A Bench of three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v. Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (1979) 2 SCC 80 held that relief of reinstatement with continuity of service can be granted where termination of service is found to be invalid. It would mean that the employer has taken away illegally the right to work of the workman contrary to the relevant law or in breach of contract and simultaneously deprived the workman of his earnings. If thus the act of employer is found to be totally illegal and arbitrary, in that eventuality the workman is required to be reinstated, with full back wages. Plain common sense also dictates that the removal of an order terminating the services of workmen must ordinarily lead to the reinstatement of the services of the workmen alongwith payment of back wages.
16- However, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case General Manager, Haryana Roadways Vs. Rudan Singh, reported as 2005 SCC (L&S) 716 observed as under :-
"8. There is no rule of thumb that in every case where the Industrial Tribunal gives a finding that the termination of service was in violation of Section 25-F of the Act, entire back wages should be awarded. A host of factors like the manner and method of selection and appointment i.e. whether after proper advertisement of the vacancy or inviting applications from the employment exchange, nature of appointment namely, whether ad hoc, short term, daily wage, temporary or permanent in character, any special qualification required for the job and the like should be weighed and balanced in taking a decision regarding award of back wages. One of the important factors which has to be taken into consideration is the length of service, which the workman had rendered with the employer. If the workman has rendered a considerable period of service and his services are wrongfully terminated, he may be awarded full or partial back wages keeping in view the fact that at this age and the qualification possessed by him he may not be in a position to get another employment. However, where the total length of service rendered by a workman is very small, the award of back wages for the complete period i.e. from the date of termination till the date of the award, which our experience shows is often quite large, would be wholly inappropriate. A regular service of permanent character cannot be compared to short or intermittent daily wage employment though it may be for 240 days in a calendar year."
17. Yet in another latest case of Bholanath Lal and others Vs. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd., Manu/DE/1922/2018 (decided on 10/5/2018), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while considering the question of illegal termination and reinstatement held as under :-
"The cases in which the competent court or tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the statutory provisions and/or the principles of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or workman, then the court or tribunal concerned will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages. In such cases, the superior courts should not exercise power under Article 226 or 136 of the Constitution and interfere with the award passed by the Labour Court, etc. merely because there is a possibility of forming a different opinion on the entitlement of the employee/workman to get full back wages or the employer's obligation to pay the same The courts must always keep in view that that in the cases of wrongful/illegal termination of service,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3453 the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee./workman and there is no justification to give a premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of the burden to pay to the employee/ workman his dues in the form of full back wages."
A similar view has been taken in the case of Delhi Jal Board Vs. Vimal Kumar (decided on 5-4-2018) MANU/de/1322/2018 wherein service of a casual driver was terminated without any notice or payment of one month's salary in lieu of such notice. The Industrial Tribunal answering the reference held the action of the management to be illegal and in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. The Award was upheld by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by observing as under :-
"In view of the above discussion, I am unable to discern any illegality or infirmity in the impugned Award, dated 29th May, 2003, of the Labour Court, to the extent that it holds the termination of the services of the respondent, by the petitioner, to be illegal and unlawful. I am entirely in agreement with the finding, of the Labour Court, that the services of the respondent were retrenched in violation of Section 25-F of the ID Act and that, therefore, he was entitled to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. In view of the fact that going by the age of the respondent as disclosed in the counter affidavit filed before this Court, he would, today, be only 50 years of age, and also in view of the fact that the termination of his services as SCM Driver was not on account of any deficiency or shortcoming detected in the manner of discharge by the respondent, of his duties as such, I am of the opinion, that the facts of the present case, do not warrant any interference with the direction, of the Labour Court, to the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service with the benefit of continuity of service. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to reinstate the respondent in service forthwith.
Inasmuch as the respondent has not been rendering any service to the petitioner since the date of his termination, however, the back wages payable to the respondent would be limited to 50 per cent of the wages which he would have drawn he had continued to serve the petitioner….."
18- Having regard to the legal position as discussed above and the fact that the claimants were performing duty to a post of regular and perennial nature, this Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant herein is entitled for reinstatement into service on the same post, with 50 per cent back wages, inasmuch as termination of the claimants/workmen is per-se illegal and the claimant/workman is not gainfully employed anywhere since after his termination by the Management. Award is passed accordingly.
Dated : 5-3-2019
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-792.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kky;] ys[kk ijh{kk] (dsaUnzh; O;;) ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 57@2017) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 11@04@2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.792.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 57/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Directorate, Audit, (Central Expenditure), New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 11/04/2019.
[No. L-42011/114/2017–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer3454 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
IN THE COURT OF SHRI AVTAR CHAND DOGRA : PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No.1, DWARKA COURTS COMPLEX : NEW DELHI.
ID No. 57/2017
Rakesh Kumar s/o. Shri Barho Ram, H.No.Q-41, Krishan Vihar, near Human Mandir, Pooth Kalan Road, Delhi 110086. …Workman
Versus
The Director General of Audit, (Central Expenditure), Indraprastha Marg, DGACR Building, Vikram Nagar, IP Estate, New Delhi 110002. …Management
AWARD
This Award shall decide a reference made by the appropriate Govt. under sub-section 2A of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") vide its letter bearing No.L-42011/114/2016-IR(DU) dated 3/3/2017, terms of which are as under :-
"Whether the Director General of Audit does not fall under the definition of Industry. Moreover, in one of the similar cases, the MoLE, does not consider the dispute fit for adjudication on the ground that the activity of the CAG cannot be found Industry under the provisions of the ID Act, 1947? A copy of the same is enclosed with the written statement submitted by the management."
2. Notice was issued to both the parties. The workman/claimant filed his statement of claim and as per averments made therein, brief facts relevant for disposal of the reference are that pursuant to the advertisement published in Employment News dated 28/8/2010 and 3/9/2010, the claimant who was 12th class pass and having past experience of working under Govt. of NCT of Delhi, had applied for the post of MTS in the office of Management. The Management selected total 436 candidates, out of them 68 were 12th pass. Since the claimant was not short listed for interview of the said post, he sought status of his application from Management through RTI applications. It is pleaded that the Management deliberately supplied distorted and self contradictory information under RTI Act. As such, the claimant raised an industrial dispute before the ALC/Conciliation Officer, New Delhi and there the Management raised certain objections inter-alia that CAG of India can not be treated as an "industry" under the provisions of Act and hence the reference. It is also pleaded that Management in fact is an organization totally different inasmuch as office of CAG of India was established by an Act of Parliament in 1971, whereas the office of Management was not established by any Act of Parliament. It is only a department established for audit of various departments of Govt. and other bodies. The Management office was lastly reconstituted in the year 2009 as separate identity for audit of Central expenditure. It is further pleaded that activity of Management are/were for multiple functions and are analogous to carrying to trade or business and for providing such services, various staff and other categories of persons are hired. Moreover, carrying of audit to other department or undertaking is to check and highlight the lapse and also to curtail the expenditure of tax payers money utilized for human necessity. It has been claimed that the Management is not carrying any sovereign functions. Prayer has been made that the reference may be decided in favour of the workman.
3. Claim has been contested by the Management by filing reply thereto. It has been alleged that Management department is one of the functionaries/department working under the Comptroller & Auditor General of India (in short "CAG") and performs various sovereign duties in respect of audit of the Government accounts for and on behalf of CAG. It is alleged that the Management never recruited any person by the name of Rakesh Kumar s/o. Barho Ram (i.e.claimant herein) and since dispute raised by the claimant purely relates to service matter, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the present reference. It has also been alleged that ordinarily a department of Govt. can not be held to be an "industry: and as such Management department is not an industry within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Act. Prayer has been made for dismissal of the claim petition.
4. It is evident from the terms of reference as well as from the pleadings of the parties that the issue involved is purely legal in nature. Learned A./R for both the parties submitted on 19/2/2019 that they did not want to adduce evidence and hence arguments were advanced by Shri O.P.Sharma, A/R for the claimant and Shri Diwankar Sethi, A/R for the Management.
5. Learned A/R appearing A/R for the claimant strenuously argued that the Management was not established by any Act of the Parliament and that the Management is not discharging any sovereign function, rather the Management is running a systematic activity organized with the cooperation of its employees. He relied on the decision of our own High Court in the case of Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Vs. UOI and others, 2001-I-LLJ (Delhi) 191,. wherein while noting that though the petitioner society was registered as a society with laudable and altruistic objective, yet there was a systematic activity which is organized by cooperation between employer and employees and services are rendered[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3455 to satisfy human wants and wishes, the petitioner Society was held to be an "industry" within the definition of Section 2(j) of the Act.
6. Per contra, learned A/R for the Management submitted that the Management being the functionary/department of CAG can not be treated as an "industry" under Section 2(J) of the Act. Much reliance has been placed on the decision of Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad (Circuit Bench at Luknow) in the case of Vivek Ranjan Srivastava and another Versus Union of India and others, (1990) 14 Administrative Tribunal cases 75, wherein it has been held that the departments/authorities exercising the sovereign functions are excluded from the definition of "industry" as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act.
7. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions of the parties. At the outset I may mention here that the definition of 'industry' as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act, is in two parts. In its first part it means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers. This part of definition determines an industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities. These activities are specified by five words and they determine when an industry is and what the cognate expression 'industrial' is intended to convey. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes. This part gives extended connotation. If the activity can be described as an industry with reference to the occupation of the employers, the ambit of the industry, under the force of the second part, takes in the different kinds of activity of the employees mentioned in the second part. But, the second part alone cannot define 'industry'. An industry is not to be found in every case of employment or service. By the inclusive part of the definition the labour force employed in an industry is made an integral part of the industry for purposes of industrial disputes although industry is ordinarily something which employers create or undertake. Before the work engaged in by an employer can be described against industry, it must bear the definite character of 'trade' or 'business' or 'manufacture' or 'calling' or must be capable of being described as an undertaking resulting in material goods or material services. Where an activity is to be considered as an industry, it must not be casual but must be distinctly systematic and the wok for which workmen are employed must be productive and the workmen must be following an employment, calling or industrial avocation. The word 'industry' must take its colour from the definition and that it discloses that a workman is to be regarded as one employed in an industry if he is following one of the vocations mentioned in conjunction with his employers engaged in the vocation mentioned in relation to the employers."
8. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978(36) FLR 266 dealt at length with the ambit and scope of expression "industry" as defined in Section 2(J) of the Act and laid down the dominant nature test in para 131 as under''
"(a) Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on the total undertaking some of whom are not "workman" as in the University of Delhi case (supra) or some departments are not productive of goods and services, if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the services and integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur (supra) will be the true test. The whole undertaking will be "industry" although those who are not 'workmen' by definition may not benefit by the status.
(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses, sovereign functions strictly understood (alone) qualify for exemption not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or Statutory bodies.
(c ) Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable, they can be considered to come within section 2(j).
(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions way well remove from the scope of the Act categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.
(e) We overrule Safdarjung (supra), Solicitors' case (supra), Gymkhana (supra), Delhi University (supra), Dhanrajgiri Hospital (supra) and other ruling whose ratio runs counter to the principles enunciated above and Hospital Mazdoor Sabha (supra) is hereby rehabilitated."
9. The ratio of the Constitution Bench judgement in aforesaid case holds the field. The case of the claimant is to be adjudged on the basis of aforesaid tests laid down by the Apex Court. It was mainly emphasized by the learned A/R appearing for the Management that the Management is one of the functionaries/department of CAG and that CAG is performing sovereign functions. It is fairly settled that only those sovereign functions which are strictly understood as such, would qualify for exemption. Three traditional sovereign functions namely legislative power, the administration of laws and the exercise of the judicial power, are well known. In Sub-Divisional Inspector of Post Vs. Tgheyyam Joseph, (1996) 8 SCC 489, Hon'ble Supreme Court had the occasion to consider whether the establishment of Sub- Divisional Inspector of Post at Vaikam is an "industry" and it was observed in para 6 that :-
"….India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, republic has to establish an egalitarian social order under rule of law. The welfare measures partake the character of sovereign function and the traditional duty to maintain law and order is no longer the concept of the State. Directive Principles of State Policy enjoin on the State diverse duties under Part IV of the Constitution and the performance of the duties are constitutional functions. One of the duties of the State is to provide telecommunication service to the general public and an3456 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] amenity and so is an essential part of the sovereign functions of the State as a welfare State. It is not, therefore, an industry".
While taking the aforesaid view, the Apex Court was also influenced by the fact that the method of recruitment, the conditions of service, the scale of pay and the conduct rules regulating the service conditions of the Extra-Departmental Agents employed by the said establishment are governed by the statutory rules and regulations and that those employees are civil servants. Therefore, while applying the traditional test, approved in Bangalore Water Supply case (supra) determine what can be regarded as sovereign functions, the change in the concept of sovereign functions of a constitutional government has to be kept in mind.
8. In the case of State of Gujarat & others Versus Pratamsingh Narsinh Parmar , Manu/SC/1146/2001. Hon'ble Supreme Court observed in para 5 that
"If a dispute arises as to whether a particular establishment or part of it wherein an appointment has been made is an industry or not, it would be for the person concerned who claims the same to be an industry, to give positive facts for coming to the conclusion that it constitutes "an industry". Ordinarily, a Department of the Government can not be held to be an industry and rather it is a part of the sovereign function…."
9. There is no assertion from the side of the claimant to suggest that the Management is engaged in an activity which can be called business, trade or manufacture. There is nothing on record to suggest that the Management/Department is engaged in a commercial or industrial activity and it can be described as an economic venture or a commercial enterprise as its object is to produce and distribute services which would satisfy wants and needs of consumer community. Primarily, the Management Department is an institution discharging governmental functions. Even though it is assumed that the Management Department is carrying on the activity of audit work in governmental/public undertakings with the aid and help of its employees – may be in order to check & highlight the lapses in making expenditure and also to curtail the expenditure of tax payers money, it would not be appropriate to conclude that the Management Director General of Audit (Central Expenditure), is an "industry". Consequently, it has to be held that the Management –Director General of Audit does not fall within the definition of "Industry" as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act.
10. Before parting with I may mention that the claimant did not work with the Management department on a single day rather his grievance against the Management is about his non-selection to the post of MTS and as such, there was no relationship of employer-employee between the parties. In such a situation also, from the angle of the claimant also, it would not be proper to conclude that the Management/Department is "an industry" qua the claimant herein.
11. As a corollary to the aforesaid discussion, this Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that the Management/Department is not "an industry" under Section 2(j) of the Act, qua the claimant herein. The reference is decided accordingly. A copy of this Award be sent to the appropriate Govt. for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.
Dated : 09.04.2019
AVTAR CHAND DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-793.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd] jk"Vªh; vuqla/kku dsanz e'k:e] lksyu] ,p-ih- vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 5@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 8-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.793.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 5/2010) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director, National Research Centre Mushroom, Solan, H.P. & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 8.04.2019.
[No. L-42011/19/2010–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3457
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH
Present : Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer
ID No. 5/2010
Registered on:-04.05.2010
Sh. Ramesh Kumar, S/o Sh. Jeet Ram, R/o Vill. Madhiana, P.O. Kota, Tehsil Shillai, Distt. Sirmour(H.P.), Through J.C. Bhardwaj, President, HPAITUC, Hq. Saproon, Solan(H.P.).
….…..Workman
Versus
1. The Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, Chambaghat, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P (Principal Employer).
2. M/s. Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services, S.C.O-2475-76, 1st Floor, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh. 3. Captain R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency, Shayam Nagar, Hamirpur(H.P.)
…Respondents
AWARD
Passed on:-03.04.2019
Central Government vide Notification No. L-42011/19/2010-IR(DU) Dated 15.04.2010, under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-
"Whether the contract between the management of National Research Centre for Mashroom and their contractor with regard to employment of Shri Ramesh Kumar is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the action of the management in terminating his services w.e.f. 01.11.2006 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The facts, in brief, are that Sh. Ramesh Kumar was engaged as Mazdoor by respondent no.1 during the month of August 2000 directly to perform duties like making compost out of raw material, harvesting, plucking of mushroom and working in testing laboratory as Helper and further as Peon and later on his name was transferred on the roll of respondent No.2 while he remained to perform the same duties with the management. Despite of serving for more than 6 years, the claimant/workman was terminated on the instance of respondent No.1 by respondent No.3 on 01.11.2006 even without complying the provisions of ID Act 1947 without any basis, reasons and justifications. The allotment of perennial nature of work to the contractor is sham, camouflage and bogus for all purposes and the claimant/workman is remained working with the respondent no.1 under the supervision of Mr. Sunil Verma who was working on the post of Assistant in the office of respondent No.1. The claimant/workman remained working with respondent No.1 whereas the contractors remained coming and going as per the convenience of respondent No.1 who was the legal employer of the claimant/workman. The services of junior workmen in the same establishment were retained by the respondent while terminating the services of senior workmen as such, the respondents committed serious act of violation under Section 25-G which was further violative of Section 25-H of the Act. 2. Respondent No.1 has filed his written statement, stating therein that workman was never engaged by the Directorate National Research Centre of Mushroom as alleged. As a matter of fact, he was engaged by different contractors for various contractual job work assigned to them by the Directorate as per the policy/guidelines of the Government of India Annexure R-1 and Annexure R-2. The workman never worked with the management and never completed 240 days. The Directorate of Mushroom Research is a constituent of Indian Council of Agricultural Research which is an autonomous body with a mandate to conduct research and training in the field of agriculture. It is not engaged in any business, trade or industrial activity as such, and is not an industry in the meaning of Section 2(J) of the Act. There was no employer and employee relationship between the workman and management. The workman has not legal, valid and subsisting cause of action against the Directorate to file the claim petition. The management has not given any assurance as alleged by the workman in his claim petition and his name was not transferred on the role of respondent No.2 as alleged. It is also stated that respondent-management has not appointed the workman nor terminated his services as such, there is no requirement of notice by the Directorate of Mushroom. Thus, it is clear that the workman has no claim and there is no violation of the provisions of ID Act as such, the claim petition is liable to be dismissed with cost. 3. Claimant/workman Ramesh Kumar has submitted his replication/rejoinder, reiterating his all facts as alleged in the claim petition. Claimant/workman has alleged that respondents are jointly and severely responsible for all illegal actions pertaining to illegal termination of the claimant/workman. The remaining facts alleged in the rejoinder/replication is the same as is alleged in the claim petition therefore, need not to require to be reiterated.
3458 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]4. Respondent No.2 and 3 namely M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services, S.C.O-2475-76, 1st Floor, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh and Captain R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency, Shayam Nagar, Hamirpur(H.P.) have not file any written statement or reply against claim petition and thus, have not participated in the proceeding before the Tribunal.
5. In support of his case, the workman Ramesh Kumar has examined himself and filed his affidavit Ex.WW1, reiterating the case as set out in the claim petition. This witness has also proved that Ex.WW1/2 relates to his bank- account, Ex.WW1/3 is a letter of respondent No.2 M/s. Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services, Ex.WW1/4 issued by Capt. R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency. During the course of cross-examination workman submitted that neither any appointment letter was issued by the respondent-management of National Research Centre Mushroom nor he has any proof about his appointments. He has also admitted that he has no proof regarding his transfer by the management to the contractors. He has alleged that his salary was being paid by the labour incharge Mr. Sunil Verma but was unable to tell as to whose account the salary was issued. He has also accepted that he has no proof that salary is paid by Mr. Sunil Verma. Thus, this witness has categorically stated that he has no documentary proofs regarding his appointment, termination and payment of salary by the respondent-Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom.
6. Respondent No.1 i.e. Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom has submitted affidavit of Mr. Sunil Verma as evidence, who has been cross-examined by the learned counsel of the workman. This witness has accepted that he was labour incharge at Chambaghat of the respondent No.1. He has admitted that management had contract labour but he did not know who was the first contractor. He has denied that workman did the work of Peon and Chowkidar. Witness Sunil Verma has accepted that mushrooms are grown in the farm for research purposes and is not sold in the market the entire product is used for research purpose. He has accepted that mushrooms are still grown there. This witness in fact is unable to tell the names of contractors the length of agreement with the contractor and employment and duration of the workman with the different contractors.
7. I have heard the oral arguments of Sh. J.C. Bhardwaj learned counsel of the workman as well as oral arguments of Sh. S.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the management and perused the file and written arguments carefully.
8. Learned counsel of the workman has contended that claimant/workman has joined the respondent No.1 National Research Centre of Mushroom in the month of August 2000 as Mazdoor directly to perform duties like making compost out of raw material, harvesting, plucking of mushroom and working in testing laboratory as Helper and further as Peon. It is also contended that subsequently claimant's name was transferred on the roll of respondent No.2 M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services for the purpose of attendance and wages whereas the duties remained the same. It is also contended that the claimant/workman terminate/retrenched on 01.11.2006 without complying the provisions of ID Act 1947 without any notice and justification which is not sustainable in the eye of law. Learned counsel has also argued that claimant/workman had worked more than 240 days in each calendar year with the management. Though, his name was enrolled with the contractors to avoid the liability under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The management had adopted the policy of hire and fire formally and the alleged contract/agreement with respondent no.2 and 3 are same camouflage just to avoid the responsibility arising under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is also contended that the alleged contractors were not licenced contractors as such, respondent-management had taken their services against the provisions of Contract Labour(Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970.
9. Per contra, learned counsel of the management argued that claimant is neither workman nor appointed by the National Research Centre of Mushroom for the work of perennial nature. It is also contended that National Research Centre of Mushroom is not an 'industry' and workers were engaged as per guidelines of the Government for temporary period through licenced contractors. Learned counsel also contended that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the workman and management as such, respondent-management has no liability towards the workman. It is also contended that being the employee of contractors, if any liability occurs, it is between workman/claimant and contractors under whom he served during the employment period. Learned counsel of the management has placed reliance on the case of Physical Research Laboratory Vs. K.G. Sharma, Civil Appeal No.2663/1997 dated 08.04.1997.
10. The first contention regarding the claimant is that whether he comes within the definition of workman as is defined in Section 2(S) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. I may mention that claimant was appointed as majdoor/peon as per his claim petition and affidavit submitted before the Tribunal. In plain words the claimant was performing his duties as labourer/unskilled worker. He was not in supervisory or administrative post requiring him to perform only administrative duties. While interpreting Section 2(S) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, has observed as follows:-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There
is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person employed on
regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3459temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours
is not a workman."
Thus Hon'ble Supreme Court has clarified that the definition of workmen also does not make any distinction between full time or part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in plain language of Section 2(S) from which it can be infer that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman. In view of the ratio of law enunciated in the above ruling, in my considered opinion the claimant herein admittedly falls within the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(S) of the Act.
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court after analysing the catena of cases has laid down in Balwant Raj Saluja Vs. Air India Limited in Civil Appeal No.10266 dated 25.08.2014, two well recognised tests to find out whether the labours are the contract employees of the principal employer are:-
(1) Whether the principal employer pays the salary instead of contractor and
(2) Whether the principal employer controls and supervise the work of the employees?
The facts regarding the payment of salary by the management or contractor has not been stated in the claim petition of the workman. In fact, claim petition is totally silent regarding the payment of wages, salary, letter of appointment or anything likewise. Similarly, workman namely Ramesh Kumar has not mentioned anything regarding the mode of payment of wages, salaries etc. in his affidavit. Thus, this basic feature for holding the relationship of employer and employee is totally lacking not in the pleading but also in the evidence submitted by the workman. In this connection, learned counsel for the workman has contended that payment of salary was subject to the control and supervision of the management and virtually it was paid by the management as is alleged by the witness Ramesh Kumar during the course of cross-examination by the management. I am not satisfied with the arguments of the learned counsel of the workman as nothing is mentioned in pleading/claim petition as well as affidavit submitted by the witness in support of the claim petition. It is also pertinent to mention that nothing is on record in the form of documentary evidence that the workman was directly paid by the management. It is surprising that claimant as witness has not stated in his affidavit about the amount of salary or wages payable to him either by the management or by the contractor. Thus, on this issue, safely, it can be inferred that there is nothing on record to prove the factum of payment of salary by the management.
12. Secondly, so far as, the question of controls and supervision is concerned. Claimant has stated that he worked under the supervision of Sunil Kumar, labour in-charge. Except this, nothing is brought on record to prove that it is management who was supervising and controlling the work of claimant. In fact, witness Ramesh Kumar has stated in cross-examination that he has not any documentary evidence regarding the supervision by the management through his Supervisor. The question remains to be seen whether mere supervision by management/institute amount effective control. The Apex Court in the case of International Airport Authority of India vs. International Air Cargo Workers Union [209 (13) SCC374] has held as follows:-
"If the contract is for supply of labour, necessarily, the labour supplied by the contractor will work under the
directions, supervision and control of the principal employer but that would not make the worker a direct
employee of the principal employer, if the salary is paid by contractor, if the right to regulate employment is
with the contractor, and the ultimate supervision and control lies with the contractor.
The principal employer only controls and directs the work to be done by a contract labour, when such labour
is assigned/allotted/sent to him. But it is the contractor as employer, who chooses whether the worker is to be
assigned/allotted to the principal employer or used otherwise. In short, worker being the employee of the
contractor, the ultimate supervision and control lies with the contractor as he decides whether the employee
will work and how long he will work and subject to what conditions. Only when the contractor assigns/sends
the worker to work under the principal employer, the worker works under the supervision and control of the
principal employer but that is secondary control. The primary control is with the contractor."
13. Thus, the principal enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court clearly establishes that mere supervision of work is not sufficient to prove the relationship of employer and employee till it is proved that there was a complete control and supervision. The management control includes the authority of dismissal, taking of disciplinary action and continuity of service etc. Claim petition filed by the claimant is mum on this score and the claimant has not mentioned any specific averments in their affidavits regarding the appointment, authority of dismissal or taking of disciplinary action by the management. There is nothing on record to prove that it is the management who grants his leave or has authority to take any disciplinary action. In my considered opinion, mere saying of supervision by Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma regarding the work as alleged by the claimant witness may not be called as effective and absolute control. Such control is being emphasised to control the work of the management for a specific work inefficient manner done by the management in the establishment.
3460 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]14. Vital question which arises for consideration is whether Research Institute does not come within the definition of "Industry" as is argued by the learned counsel of the management. It is worthwhile to mention here that the definition of 'industry' as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act, is in two parts. In its first part it means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers. This part of definition determines an industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities. These activities are specified by five words and they determine when an industry is and what the cognate expression 'industrial' is intended to convey. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes. This part gives extended connotation. If the activity can be described as an industry with reference to the occupation of the employers, the ambit of the industry, under the force of the second part, takes in the different kinds of activity of the employees mentioned in the second part. But, the second part alone cannot define 'industry'. An industry is not to be found in every case of employment or service. By the inclusive part of the definition the labour force employed in an industry is made an integral part of the industry for purposes of industrial disputes although industry is ordinarily something which employers create or undertake. Before the work engaged in by an employer can be described against industry, it must bear the definite character of 'trade' or 'business' or 'manufacture' or 'calling' or must be capable of being described as an undertaking resulting in material goods or material services. Where an activity is to be considered as an industry, it must not be casual but must be distinctly systematic and the wok for which workmen are employed must be productive and the workmen must be following an employment, calling or industrial avocation. The word 'industry' must take its colour from the definition and that it discloses that a workman is to be regarded as one employed in an industry if he is following one of the vocations mentioned in conjunction with his employers engaged in the vocation mentioned in relation to the employers."
15. Learned counsel of the management has drawn my attention towards the judgment of the Hon'ble apex court in the case of Physical Research Laboratory Vs. K.G. Sharma(supra) and submitted that respondent- management could not be termed as 'industry' in the light of the proposition held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel of the respondent-management contended that there is nothing on record to prove that the research work of mushroom is marketable or has commercial value as it is used for research work only. Learned counsel also argued that object of National Research Centre of Mushroom is not commercial. Contrary to this, the learned counsel of workman has drawn my attention to the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978(36) FLR 266 in which Hon'ble Court had dealt at length with the ambit and scope of expression "industry" as defined in Section 2(J) of the Act and held as under:-
"(a) Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on
the total undertaking some of whom are not "workman" as in the University of Delhi case (supra) or some
departments are not productive of goods and services, if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the
services and integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur (supra) will be
the true test. The whole undertaking will be "industry" although those who are not 'workmen' by
definition may not benefit by the status.
(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses, sovereign functions strictly understood (alone) qualify for
exemption not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or Statutory
bodies.
(c) Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they
are substantially severable, they can be considered to come within section 2(j).
(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions way well remove from the scope of the Act
categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.
16. Though, nothing brought on record on behalf of the workman that the research work done by the respondent- management regarding mushroom is marketable and sold by the respondent-management to earn money. In this connection, it may be noted that neither in claim petition nor in written statement anything has specifically stated regarding the nature of organization and object of research carried on by the respondent-management. Thus, there is insufficient evidence on the part of both the parties to draw any clear cut finding regarding the nature and research carried on in the respondent-management. But to my mind, the facts of Bangalore Water Supply case in which it is observed that the pre-dominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the case of Nagpur case will be true test. The Hon'ble Suprme Court is of the view that the sovereign functions strictly understood(alone) qualify for exemption not for the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by the management or statutory bodies. According to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to come within Section 2(j). Question which is relevant for the purpose is that the respondent-management is undoubtedly involves in research of mushroom which is not only marketable but also of consumer use. In fact all the agricultural institutes or research laboratories are basically meant to research and produce some better fruits, vegetables and other commodities which are beneficial to the public at large. Contrary to this in case of Physical Research Laboratory vs.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 346117. Learned counsel of the workman placing reliance in the case of Umrala Gram Panchayat vs. The Secretary, Municipal Employees' Union & Ors., has contended that the alleged contractor have no valid licence to supply the labours to the management and management has got no licence to that effect also. The management has admitted that the workman was employed through different contractors at different times but nothing is stated regarding the name of contractors', periods and years of agreement licence etc. with the respective contractors as is required by the law. Respondent-management has clearly accepted in his written statement as well as Mr. Sunil Verma in his affidavit that claimant/workman was employed by the different contractors at different time who hwere duly licenced contractors under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 but nothing is placed on record to prove that respondent Nos.2 and 3 namely M/s. Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services and Vikas Security Agency were duly licenced contractors to supply the workman as well as other labours to the respondent-management. In fact, respondent no.1 National Research Centre of Mushroom has not filed even the copies of contracts/agreements entered into between the respondent-management with the different contractors. Thus, the pleading and evidences adduced by the respondent-management is very vague as well as not supported by any documents relating to agreement between the respondents and contractors. Contrary to this learned counsel of the workman has drawn my attention towards the letter issued by Satnam Singh Ahluwalia partner of Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services Ex.WW1/3 in which respondent No.2 has admitted that claimant/workman had joined his firm during the month of July 2000 and had worked for 240 days in each calendar year from 2001 to 2002. This information letter addressed to Labour Office also reveals that claimant had subsequently joined the succeeding contractor after the expiration of contract with respondent No.1. This documentary evidence clearly puts workman on better footing and fortifies his stand that he had worked with the management though, his name was shown on the roll of contractors for the purpose of attendance on wages. Thus, it is crystal clear that existence of any agreements/contracts with the respondent Nos.2 and 3 could not be proved by respondent No.1 Research Institute. Hence the Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that alleged contracts/agreements is shame and bogus in the eye of law.
18. Now the last question which is incidental to the main issue is whether claimant is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages. Admittedly, claimant was not holding the regular post against a regular vacancy. There are number of factors which are to be considered while considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. Since claimant was a casual worker and duration of his engagement is also not very long, as such it would be difficult to given the relief or reinstatement to the claimant. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad vs. Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under:-
"Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal, because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation."
19. In the recent decision reported as 2018 LLR 225 titled as District Development Officer & another vs. Satish Katilal Amrelia, Hon'ble Apex Court while aptly applying the law laid down in earlier case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177, had awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.2.5 lakhs to the workman and in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra), it was observed as under:-
"33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgements that the ordinary principle of grant of
reinstatement with full back wages when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in
all cases. While that may be a position where services of a regular/permanent workman are terminated
illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimisation, unfair labour wages is not automatic and instead
the workman should be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for
shifting in this direction is obvious.
3462 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]34. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatory required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he has no right to seek regularisation (see State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi (3) 17). Thus, when he cannot claim for regularisation and he has no right to continue even as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to be served in reinstating such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself inasmuch as if he is terminated again after reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in the form of retrenchment compensation and notice pay, in such a situation, giving the relief of reinstatement that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.
35. We would, however, like to add a caveat here. There may be cases where termination of a daily wage
worker is found to be illegal on the ground that it was resorted to as unfair labour practice or in violation of
principle of last come first go, vis. While retrenching such a worker daily wage juniors to him were retained.
There may also be a situation that persons junior to him were regularised under some policy but the
workman concerned terminated, in such circumstances, the terminated worker should not be denied
reinstatement unless there are some other weighty reasons for adopting the course of grant of compensation
instead of reinstatement in such cases, reinstatement should be the rule and only in exceptional cases for the
reasons stated to be in writing, such relief can be denied."
20. Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant. An amount of Rs.2 lakh appears to be just and reasonable.
21. As a sequel to my aforesaid discussion, it is held that the action of the management in terminating the services of claimant Shri Ramesh Kumar is illegal and unjustified under the law. The claimant is held entitled for compensation of Rs.2 lakh payable by the management with 6% interest from the date of the publication of the Award. This award is accordingly passed.
22. The reference is answered accordingly. Let copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.
A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-794.—vkSn~;ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd] jk"Vªh; vuqla/kku dsanz e'k:e] lksyu] ,p-ih- vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkSn~;ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 4@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 8-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.794.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 4/2010) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Chandigarh as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director, National Research Centre Mushroom, Solan, H.P. & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 8.04.2019.
[No. L-42011/18/2010–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3463
ANNEXURE
IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, CHANDIGARH
Present : Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer
ID No.4/2010
Registered on:-04.05.2010 Sh. Vijay Narain Upadhya, S/o Sh. Padmakar Upadhya, R/o C/o Durga Bhawan, Near HFCL, Chambaghat, Solan(H.P.), Through J.C. Bhardwaj, President, HPAITUC, Hq. Saproon, Solan(H.P.).
…Workman
Versus
1. The Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, Chambaghat, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P(Principal Employer).
2. M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services, S.C.O-2475-76, 1st Floor, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh. 3. Captain R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency, Shayam Nagar, Hamirpur(H.P.)
…Respondents
AWARD
Passed on:-03.04.2019
Central Government vide Notification No. L-42011/18/2010-IR(DU) Dated 15.04.2010, under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-
"Whether the contract between the management of National Research Centre for Mashroom and their contractor with regard to employment of Shri Vijay Narain Upadhyay is sham and bogus? If yes, whether the action of the management in terminating his services w.e.f. 01.11.2006 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The facts, in brief, are that Sh. Vijay Narain Upadhya was engaged as Mazdoor by respondent no.1 during the month of February 1998 directly to perform duties like making compost out of raw material, harvesting, plucking of mushroom and working in testing laboratory as Helper and further as Peon till February 1999. Later on during the month of March 1999, his name was transferred on the roll of respondent no.2 while he remained to perform the same duties with the management. Despite of serving for more than 9 years, the claimant/workman was terminated on the instance of respondent no.1 by respondent no.3 on 01.11.2006 even without complying the provisions of ID Act 1947 without any basis, reasons and justifications. The allotment of perennial nature of work to the contractor is sham, camouflage and bogus for all purposes and the claimant/workman is remained working with the respondent no.1 under the supervision of Mr. Sunil Verma who was working on the post of Assistant in the office of respondent no.1. The claimant/workman remained working with respondent no.1 whereas the contractors remained coming and going as per the convenience of respondent no.1 who was the legal employer of the claimant/workman. The services of junior workmen in the same establishment were retained by the respondent while terminating the services of senior workmen as such, the respondents committed serious act of violation under Section 25-G which was further violative of Section 25-H of the Act. 2. Respondent no.1 has filed his written statement, stating therein that workman was never engaged by the Directorate National Research Centre of Mushroom as alleged. As a matter of fact, he was engaged by different contractors for various contractual job work assigned to them by the Directorate as per the policy/guidelines of the Government of India Annexure R-1 and Annexure R-2. The workman never worked with the management and never completed 240 days. The Directorate of Mushroom Research is a constituent of Indian Council of Agricultural Research which is an autonomous body with a mandate to conduct research and training in the field of agriculture. It is not engaged in any business, trade or industrial activity as such, and is not an industry in the meaning of Section 2(J) of the Act. There was no employer and employee relationship between the workman and management. The workman has not legal, valid and subsisting cause of action against the Directorate to file the claim petition. The management has not given any assurance as alleged by the workman in his claim petition and his name was not transferred on the role of respondent no.2 as alleged. It is also stated that respondent-management has not appointed the workman nor terminated his services as such, there is no requirement of notice by the Directorate of Mushroom. Thus, it is clear that the workman has no claim and there is no violation of the provisions of ID Act as such, the claim petition is liable to be dismissed with cost. 3. Claimant/workman Vijay Narain Upadhya has submitted his replication/rejoinder, reiterating his all facts as alleged in the claim petition. Claimant/workman has alleged that respondents are jointly and severely responsible for all illegal actions pertaining to illegal termination of the claimant/workman. The remaining facts alleged in the rejoinder/replication is the same as is alleged in the claim petition therefore, need not to require to be reiterated.
3464 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]4. Respondent no.2 and 3 namely M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services, S.C.O-2475-76, 1st Floor, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh and Captain R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency, Shayam Nagar, Hamirpur(H.P.) have not file any written statement or reply against claim petition and thus, have not participated in the proceeding before the Tribunal.
5. In support of his case, the workman Vijay Narayan Upadhya has examined himself and filed his affidavit Ex.R3, reiterating the case as set out in the claim petition. This witness has also proved that Ex.WW1/1 relates to his bank- account, Ex.WW1/2 is a letter of respondent no.2 M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services and letter of appreciation Ex.WW1/3 of respondent no.2, Ex.WW1/4 issued by Capt. R.K. Sharma, Vikas Security Agency and Ex.WW1/5 is a registration card issued by Regional Employment Exchange. During the course of cross-examination workman submitted that neither any appointment letter was issued by the respondent-management of National Research Centre Mushroom nor he has any proof about his appointments. He has also admitted that he has no proof regarding his transfer by the management to the contractors. He has alleged that his salary was being paid by the labour incharge Mr. Sunil Verma but was unable to tell as to whose account the salary was issued. He has also accepted that he has no proof that salary is paid by Mr. Sunil Verma. Thus, this witness has categorically stated that he has no documentary proofs regarding his appointment, termination and payment of salary by the respondent-Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom.
6. Respondent no.1 i.e. Director, National Research Centre for Mushroom has submitted affidavit of Mr. Sunil Verma as evidence, who has been cross-examined by the learned counsel of the workman. This witness has accepted that he was labour incharge at Chambaghat of the respondent no.1. He has admitted that management had contract labour but he did not know who was the first contractor. He has denied that workman did the work of Peon and Chowkidar. Witness Sunil Verma has accepted that mushrooms are grown in the farm for research purposes and is not sold in the market the entire product is used for research purpose. He has accepted that mushrooms are still grown there. This witness in fact is unable to tell the names of contractors the length of agreement with the contractor and employment and duration of the workman with the different contractors.
7. I have heard the oral arguments of Sh. J.C. Bhardwaj learned counsel of the workman as well as oral arguments of Sh. S.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the management and perused the file and written arguments carefully.
8. Learned counsel of the workman has contended that claimant/workman has joined the respondent no.1 National Research Centre of Mushroom in the month of February 1998 as Mazdoor directly to perform duties like making compost out of raw material, harvesting, plucking of mushroom and working in testing laboratory as Helper and further as Peon till February 1999. It is also contended that subsequently claimant's name was transferred on the roll of respondent no.2 M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services for the purpose of attendance and wages whereas the duties remained the same. It is also contended that the claimant/workman terminate/retrenched on 01.11.2006 without complying the provisions of ID Act 1947 without any notice and justification which is not sustainable in the eye of law. Learned counsel has also argued that claimant/workman had worked more than 240 days in each calendar year with the management. Though, his name was enrolled with the contractors to avoid the liability under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The management had adopted the policy of hire and fire formally and the alleged contract/agreement with respondent no.2 and 3 are same camouflage just to avoid the responsibility arising under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is also contended that the alleged contractors were not licenced contractors as such, respondent-management had taken their services against the provisions of Contract Labour(Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970.
9. Per contra, learned counsel of the management argued that claimant is neither workman nor appointed by the National Research Centre of Mushroom for the work of perennial nature. It is also contended that National Research Centre of Mushroom is not an 'industry' and workers were engaged as per guidelines of the government for temporary period through licenced contractors. Learned counsel also contended that there was no relationship of employer and employee between the workman and management as such, respondent-management has no liability towards the workman. It is also contended that being the employee of contractors, if any liability occurs, it is between workman/claimant and contractors under whom he served during the employment period. Learned counsel of the management has placed reliance on the case of Physical Research Laboratory Vs. K.G. Sharma, Civil Appeal No.2663/1997 dated 08.04.1997.
10. The first contention regarding the claimant is that whether he comes within the definition of workman as is defined in Section 2(S) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. I may mention that claimant was appointed as majdoor/peon as per his claim petition and affidavit submitted before the Tribunal. In plain words the claimant was performing his duties as labourer/unskilled worker. He was not in supervisory or administrative post requiring him to perform only administrative duties. While interpreting Section 2(S) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, has observed as follows:-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract
of service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or
not a person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also
does not make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract
basis. There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3465employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one
employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing
duty for fixed hours is not a workman."
Thus Hon'ble Supreme Court has clarified that the definition of workmen also does not make any distinction between full time or part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis. There is nothing in plain language of Section 2(S) from which it can be infer that only person employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty for fixed hours is not a workman. In view of the ratio of law enunciated in the above ruling, in my considered opinion the claimant herein admittedly falls within the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(S) of the Act.
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court after analysing the catena of cases has laid down in Balwant Raj Saluja Vs. Air India Limited in Civil Appeal No.10266 dated 25.08.2014, two well recognised tests to find out whether the labours are the contract employees of the principal employer are:-
(1) Whether the principal employer pays the salary instead of contractor and
(2) Whether the principal employer controls and supervise the work of the employees?
The facts regarding the payment of salary by the management or contractor has not been stated in the claim petition of the workman. In fact, claim petition is totally silent regarding the payment of wages, salary, letter of appointment or anything likewise. Similarly, workman namely Vijay Narain Upadya has not mentioned anything regarding the mode of payment of wages, salaries etc. in his affidavit. Thus, this basic feature for holding the relationship of employer and employee is totally lacking not in the pleading but also in the evidence submitted by the workman. In this connection, learned counsel for the workman has contended that payment of salary was subject to the control and supervision of the management and virtually it was paid by the management as is alleged by the witness Vijay Narain Upadhya during the course of cross-examination by the management. I am not satisfied with the arguments of the learned counsel of the workman as nothing is mentioned in pleading/claim petition as well as affidavit submitted by the witness in support of the claim petition. It is also pertinent to mention that nothing is on record in the form of documentary evidence that the workman was directly paid by the management. It is surprising that claimant as witness has not stated in his affidavit about the amount of salary or wages payable to him either by the management or by the contractor. Thus, on this issue, safely, it can be inferred that there is nothing on record to prove the factum of payment of salary by the management.
12. Secondly, so far as, the question of controls and supervision is concerned. Claimant has stated that he worked under the supervision of Sunil Kumar, labour in-charge. Except this, nothing is brought on record to prove that it is management who was supervising and controlling the work of claimant. In fact, witness Vijay Narain Upadhya has stated in cross-examination that he has not any documentary evidence regarding the supervision by the management through his Supervisor. The question remains to be seen whether mere supervision by management/institute amount effective control. The apex court in the case of International Airport Authority of India vs. International Air Cargo Workers Union [209 (13) SCC374] has held as follows:-
"If the contract is for supply of labour, necessarily, the labour supplied by the contractor will work under the
directions, supervision and control of the principal employer but that would not make the worker a direct
employee of the principal employer, if the salary is paid by contractor, if the right to regulate employment is
with the contractor, and the ultimate supervision and control lies with the contractor.
The principal employer only controls and directs the work to be done by a contract labour, when such labour
is assigned/allotted/sent to him. But it is the contractor as employer, who chooses whether the worker is to be
assigned/allotted to the principal employer or used otherwise. In short, worker being the employee of the
contractor, the ultimate supervision and control lies with the contractor as he decides whether the employee
will work and how long he will work and subject to what conditions. Only when the contractor assigns/sends
the worker to work under the principal employer, the worker works under the supervision and control of the
principal employer but that is secondary control. The primary control is with the contractor."
13. Thus, the principal enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court clearly establishes that mere supervision of work is not sufficient to prove the relationship of employer and employee till it is proved that there was a complete control and supervision. The management control includes the authority of dismissal, taking of disciplinary action and continuity of service etc. Claim petition filed by the claimant is mum on this score and the claimant has not mentioned any specific averments in their affidavits regarding the appointment, authority of dismissal or taking of disciplinary action by the management. There is nothing on record to prove that it is the management who grants his leave or has authority to take any disciplinary action. In my considered opinion, mere saying of supervision by Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma regarding the work as alleged by the claimant witness may not be called as effective and absolute control. Such control is being emphasised to control the work of the management for a specific work inefficient manner done by the management in the establishment.
3466 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]14 Vital question which arises for consideration is whether Research Institute does not come within the definition of "Industry" as is argued by the learned counsel of the management. It is worthwhile to mention here that the definition of 'industry' as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act, is in two parts. In its first part it means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers. This part of definition determines an industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities. These activities are specified by five words and they determine when an industry is and what the cognate expression 'industrial' is intended to convey. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes. This part gives extended connotation. If the activity can be described as an industry with reference to the occupation of the employers, the ambit of the industry, under the force of the second part, takes in the different kinds of activity of the employees mentioned in the second part. But, the second part alone cannot define 'industry'. An industry is not to be found in every case of employment or service. By the inclusive part of the definition the labour force employed in an industry is made an integral part of the industry for purposes of industrial disputes although industry is ordinarily something which employers create or undertake. Before the work engaged in by an employer can be described against industry, it must bear the definite character of 'trade' or 'business' or 'manufacture' or 'calling' or must be capable of being described as an undertaking resulting in material goods or material services. Where an activity is to be considered as an industry, it must not be casual but must be distinctly systematic and the wok for which workmen are employed must be productive and the workmen must be following an employment, calling or industrial avocation. The word 'industry' must take its colour from the definition and that it discloses that a workman is to be regarded as one employed in an industry if he is following one of the vocations mentioned in conjunction with his employers engaged in the vocation mentioned in relation to the employers."
15. Learned counsel of the management has drawn my attention towards the judgment of the Hon'ble apex court in the case of Physical Research Laboratory Vs. K.G. Sharma(supra) and submitted that respondent-management could not be termed as 'industry' in the light of the proposition held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel of the respondent-management contended that there is nothing on record to prove that the research work of mushroom is marketable or has commercial value as it is used for research work only. Learned counsel also argued that object of National Research Centre of Mushroom is not commercial. Contrary to this, the learned counsel of workman has drawn my attention to the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978(36) FLR 266 in which Hon'ble Court had dealt at length with the ambit and scope of expression "industry" as defined in Section 2(J) of the Act and held as under:-
"(a) Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on
the total undertaking some of whom are not "workman" as in the University of Delhi case (supra) or some
departments are not productive of goods and services, if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the
services and integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur (supra) will be
the true test. The whole undertaking will be "industry" although those who are not 'workmen' by
definition may not benefit by the status.
(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses, sovereign functions strictly understood (alone) qualify for
exemption not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or Statutory
bodies.
(c) Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they
are substantially severable, they can be considered to come within section 2(j).
(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions way well remove from the scope of the Act
categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.
16. Though, nothing brought on record on behalf of the workman that the research work done by the respondent- management regarding mushroom is marketable and sold by the respondent-management to earn money. In this connection, it may be noted that neither in claim petition nor in written statement anything has specifically stated regarding the nature of organization and object of research carried on by the respondent-management. Thus, there is insufficient evidence on the part of both the parties to draw any clear cut finding regarding the nature and research carried on in the respondent-management. But to my mind, the facts of Bangalore Water Supply case in which it is observed that the pre-dominant nature of the services and the integrated nature of the departments as explained in the case of Nagpur case will be true test. The Hon'ble Suprme Court is of the view that the sovereign functions strictly understood(alone) qualify for exemption not for the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by the management or statutory bodies. According to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they are substantially severable then they can be considered to come within Section 2(j). Question which is relevant for the purpose is that the respondent-management is undoubtedly involves in research of mushroom which is not only marketable but also of consumer use. In fact all the agricultural institutes or research laboratories are basically meant to research and produce some better fruits, vegetables and other commodities which are beneficial to the public at large. Contrary to this in case of Physical Research Laboratory vs. K.G. Sharma the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held clearly that knowledge so acquired by the research laboratory is not marketable or has no commercial value. The material discloses that the object with which the research activity taken by[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3467 17. Learned counsel of the workman placing reliance in the case of Umrala Gram Panchayat vs. The Secretary, Municipal Employees' Union & Ors., has contended that the alleged contractor have no valid licence to supply the labours to the management and management has got no licence to that effect also. The management has admitted that the workman was employed through different contractors at different times but nothing is stated regarding the name of contractors', periods and years of agreement licence etc. with the respective contractors as is required by the law. Respondent-management has clearly accepted in his written statement as well as Mr. Sunil Verma in his affidavit that claimant/workman was employed by the different contractors at different time who hwere duly licenced contractors under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 but nothing is placed on record to prove that respondent no.2 and 3 namely M/s Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services and Vikas Security Agency were duly licenced contractors to supply the workman as well as other labours to the respondent-management. In fact, respondent no.1 National Research Centre of Mushroom has not filed even the copies of contracts/agreements entered into between the respondent-management with the different contractors. Thus, the pleading and evidences adduced by the respondent- management is very vague as well as not supported by any documents relating to agreement between the respondents and contractors. Contrary to this learned counsel of the workman has drawn my attention towards the letter issued by Satnam Singh Ahluwalia partner of Silver Star Industrial & Allied Services Ex.WW1/2 in which respondent no.2 has admitted that claimant/workman had joined his firm during the month of June 1999 and had worked for 240 days in each calendar year from 2000 to 2002. This information letter addressed to Labour Office also reveals that claimant had subsequently joined the succeeding contractor after the expiration of contract with respondent no.1. This documentary evidence clearly puts workman on better footing and fortifies his stand that he had worked with the management though, his name was shown on the roll of contractors for the purpose of attendance on wages. Thus, it is crystal clear that existence of any agreements/contracts with the respondent no.2 and 3 could not be proved by respondent no.1 Research Institute. Hence the Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that alleged contracts/agreements is shame and bogus in the eye of law.
18. Now the last question which is incidental to the main issue is whether claimant is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages. Admittedly, claimant was not holding the regular post against a regular vacancy. There are number of factors which are to be considered while considering the question of reinstatement with back wages. Since claimant was a casual worker and duration of his engagement is also not very long, as such it would be difficult to given the relief or reinstatement to the claimant. It has been held in the case of Hari Nandan Prasad vs. Food Corporation of India (2014) 7 Supreme Court cases 190 as under:-
"Relief by way of reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be wholly inappropriate in a given fact situation even though the termination of an employee is in contravention of the prescribed procedure. Compensation instead of reinstatement has been held to meet the ends of justice. An order of retrenchment passed in violation of Section 25-F although may be set aside but an award of reinstatement should not, however, automatically passed. The award of reinstatement with full back wages in a case where the workman has completed 240 days of work in a year preceding the date of termination, particularly daily wages has not been found to be proper by the Supreme Court and instead compensation has been awarded. The Supreme Court has distinguished between a daily wager who does not hold a post and a permanent employee. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal, because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation."
19. In the recent decision reported as 2018 LLR 225 titled as District Development Officer & another vs. Satish Katilal Amrelia, Hon'ble Apex Court while aptly applying the law laid down in earlier case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Bhurumal (2014) 7 SCC 177, had awarded lumpsum compensation of Rs.2.5 lakhs to the workman and in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (supra), it was observed as under:-
"33. It is clear from the reading of the aforesaid judgements that the ordinary principle of grant of
reinstatement with full back wages when the termination is found to be illegal is not applied mechanically in
all cases. While that may be a position where services of a regular/permanent workman are terminated
illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimisation, unfair labour wages is not automatic and instead
the workman should be given monetary compensation which will meet the ends of justice. Rationale for
shifting in this direction is obvious.
34. The reasons for denying the relief of reinstatement in such cases are obvious. It is trite law that when the
termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as
mandatory required under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always
open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment
compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even after he is reinstated, he
3468 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]has no right to seek regularisation (see State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi (3) 17). Thus, when he cannot claim
for regularisation and he has no right to continue even as a daily wage worker, no useful purpose is going to
be served in reinstating such a workman and he can be given monetary compensation by the Court itself
inasmuch as if he is terminated again after reinstatement, he would receive monetary compensation only in
the form of retrenchment compensation and notice pay, in such a situation, giving the relief of reinstatement
that too after a long gap, would not serve any purpose.
35. We would, however, like to add a caveat here. There may be cases where termination of a daily wage
worker is found to be illegal on the ground that it was resorted to as unfair labour practice or in violation of
principle of last come first go, vis. While retrenching such a worker daily wage juniors to him were retained.
There may also be a situation that persons junior to him were regularised under some policy but the
workman concerned terminated, in such circumstances, the terminated worker should not be denied
reinstatement unless there are some other weighty reasons for adopting the course of grant of compensation
instead of reinstatement in such cases, reinstatement should be the rule and only in exceptional cases for the
reasons stated to be in writing, such relief can be denied."
20. Having regard to the recent judicial trends and duration of service rendered by the claimant. An amount of Rs.2.50 lakh appears to be just and reasonable.
21. As a sequel to my aforesaid discussion, it is held that the action of the management in terminating the services of claimant Shri Vijay Narain Upadhya is illegal and unjustified under the law. The claimant is held entitled for compensation of Rs.2.50 lakh payable by the management with 6% interest from the date of the publication of the Award. This award is accordingly passed.
22. The reference is answered accordingly. Let copy of the award be sent to the Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the Act.
A. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-795.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ,-ch- ikWy ,aM daiuh eacbZ ,oa muds deZpkjh vkSj vU; ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkSn~;ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 2] eaqcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k CGIT-2/1@2012) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 12-02-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.795.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. CGIT 2/1 of 2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, Mumbai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The A.B. Paul & Co. Mumbai and their workmen & others, which was received by the Central Government on 12.02-2019.
[No. L-42025/03/2009–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
Appln.(Ref) No. CGIT-2/1 of 2012
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
M/S. A.B. PAUL & CO. AND THE BOMBAY CUSTOM HOUSE AGENTS ASSOCIATION
1. Mr. Kenneth Paul,
The Properietor of M/S. A.B. Paul & Co. Custom House Agent No. (11/543), Vikas Building, 4th Fl., Room No.403,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3469 11, Bank Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 023.
2. The Bombay Custom House Agents Association, 73/74, Mittal Tower, 'C' Wing, 7th Fl., Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
Mr. Shankar Sadashiv Chavan, Room No.12, Shiv Shambo Sadan, T.P. Road, Bhandup [W], Mumbai – 400 078.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER : (1) Mr. M. B. Anchan, Advocate
(2) Absent
FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. Mohan Kumar, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 14th January, 2019.
AWARD
1. This is a reference filed under Section 2-A sub section (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in view of the amendment in the Act No. 24 of 2010.
2. The concerned workman has filed statement of claim Ex.2 contending therein that he was working with respondent No.1 employer as Custom Clerk since last 23 years. His last salary for the month of April '11 was Rs.7469/-.
3. According to the concerned workman, his salary was not increase as per Memorandum of Settlement made by the employers association wherein respondent No.1 is the member of the said Memorandum of Settlement which is applicable to all the employees including the concerned workman who was working as Sr. Clerk with respondent No.1 and did job of clearing and forwarding work at Mumbai Docks JNPT at Nava Sheva. Respondent No.2, Bombay Custom House Agents Association is representing the employers including respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 employer is the member of respondent No.2 association and liable to pay the basic pay and DA & other allowances and benefits on the basis of said Memorandum of Settlement which is applicable to all the employers of the Custom House Agents including respondent no.1. The last Memorandum of Settlement is duly executed on 29.4.08 for the period from 1.4.08 to 31.3.13.
4. According to the concerned workman the applicant completed more than 10 years and he is in 6th category as a Sr. Clerk entitled to pay scale of Rs.2690-65-3015-80-3415-90-3865-100-4365 with DA as per CPI 1198 along with FDA and other special additional allowances & benefits. He has not received the arrears of salary, DA and other benefits on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement from 1990 till date.
5. According to the concerned workman the respondent No.1 started harassing him to leave the employment. Respondent no.1 informed him by letter dt. 29.2.09 that from 1.3.09 the sundry expenses which is required for clearing and forwarding charges of dock & custom area is to be provided 20% less. After the deduction of 20% sundry expenses the clearing & forwarding work became difficult. After deducting 20% expenses the respondent No.1 further started deducting 20% from the gross salary of the concerned workman. The concerned workman refused to accept the salary after deduction but the respondent no.1 deducted 20% of salary without any reason. The respondent no.1 thereafter with a view to terminate the employment of the concerned workman purportedly and personally asked the concerned workman on 28.4.11 to start work at Sahar Airport Cargo. He was not provided IA pass for work at Sahar Airport Cargo. Without IA pass the entry is prohibited but respondent no.1 asked the concerned workman to attend the Sahar Airport Cargo. The concerned workman was asked to do the work of peon in place of one Shri Ankul Poal who was working as a Peon. When the concerned workman tried to convince the respondent to issue the permanent IA pass, his services came to be orally terminated and he was asked not to come for work at Mumbai w.e.f. 1.5.11. His salary for the month of April '11 was not given to him on the ground that custom pass was returned to respondent no.1. As such the respondent no.1 did not allow him to join his duties. Respondent no.1 refused to provide work and also did not give the pending salary for the month of April '11.
6. It is then case of the concerned workman that his services came to be orally terminated illegally. He is therefore asking for reinstatement with back wages and other benefits w.e.f. 2.5.11.
3470 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]7. According to the concerned workman he raised the dispute before ALC demanding reinstatement with back wages and other benefits with continuity of service as well as arrears of back salary, DA and other benefits. Conciliation failed and the ALC submitted failure report dt. 31.10.12. Hence this reference.
8. Respondent No.1 filed written statement Ex.10 and resisted the claim contending therein that the services of the concerned workman are / were not terminated at any time by the employer but the workman himself remained absent from his duties w.e.f. 1.5.11 though he was asked to resume his duties vide letters of the company as well as letters of the advocate and also before ALC. The concerned workman continued to remain absent and chose not to resume the duties. As such there is no question of any termination of his services and thereby reinstating him with full back wages and continuity of service etc.
9. It is also contended by the respondent no.1 that it is not signatory to the alleged settlement nor the workman is the member of Transport & Dock Workers' Union with whom the settlement is signed by respondent No.2. Therefore the said settlement is not ipso-facto applicable to respondent No.1 employer or his employees.
10. It is then case of the respondent No.1 that the concerned workman vide his letter dt. 10.8.09 had resigned from the services of the company on his own. He was not in employment for 2 months. After 2 months he requested once again to take him in the employment. At that time company considered his request sympathetically and took him in the employment.
11. According to the Respondent No.1 by letter dt. 29.9.09 it was informed that since the business is down by 80% the cost is required to be cut down and therefore no sundry expenses will be paid to BPT towards clearing of export expenses. Even the submission of the concerned workman as regards the reduction in salary is incorrect. With this it is reiterated by respondent no. 1 that there is no question of offering employment in BPT or JNPT as there is hardly any work at BPT or JNPT. It has thus sought dismissal of reference.
12. Following issues are framed at Ex.12. I reproduce the Issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
| Sr. No. | Issue | Findings |
| 1 | Whether the management has illegally terminated the services of the workman ? | No |
| 2. | Whether the workman is entitled to be reinstated with full back wages as prayed for ? | No |
| 3. | Whether the workman is entitled to the arrears in pay difference as per the bipartite agreement ? | No |
| 4. | What relief the workman is entitled to ? | No |
| 5. | What order ? | As per final order |
Reasons
Issue No.1 & 2
13. So far contention go, it is the contention of the employer management that infact the services of the applicant / concerned workman were not terminated at any time, but he himself remained absent from duties from 1.5.11 and though he was asked to resume his duties vide letters of the company and letters of the advocate. He continued to remain absent and chose not to resume the duties. In this context if we see the evidence of the concerned workman he claims that the respondent no.1 employer asked him to start work at Sahar Airport Cargo wherein for 23 years he never worked. In his examination in chief he went on to say that at Sahar Airport Cargo 3 permanent employees were already working and one peon namely Ankual Poal was working at Sahar Airport Cargo and respondent no.1 employer asked him to report at Mumbai office in his place and as such he had been asked to do the work of peon. It appears therefore from the evidence of the concerned workman that he did not report for duty at Sahar Airport Cargo since he claimed that respondent no.1 management demoted him and purposely asked to work at Sahar Airport Cargo. The fact remains that he did not report for duty at Sahar Airport Cargo and visited Mumbai office where he was not provided the work since he was asked to work at Sahar Airport Cargo.
14. Even then the concerned workman claims that he was not allowed to join duties despite he was ready and willing for joining duties.
15. In this respect, vide Ex.28 it appears that the concerned workman was given letter informing him that he remained absent without permission since 1.5.11. Inspite of such long unauthorized absence on work, he did not take care to report for the work and therefore he was called upon to report for work immediately failing which it would be deemed that he had abandoned the service from the company. It is clear from Ex.28 that he was asked to report for work immediately but he did not. On the contrary it appears that he replied the said letter vide Ex.29 mentioning therein that the employer started giving work to him at Sahar Airport Cargo where he had never worked and therefore he had reported at the work place to resume his duties and that he was told not to come to the office and sit at home. It appears therefore that the concerned workman reported at the work place but he did not resume work at cargo at Sahar airport[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3471 mentioning therein that he did not work at Sahar Airport Cargo during the period of his service tenure. It appears therefore that he himself was not willing to work at Sahar Airport Cargo and refused the management's proposal on the ground that he should be posted at JNPT work only and that his salary should be increased. It is in that circumstances it appears that when the dispute was raised before Labour commissioner on the fact, he stated that the workman demanded that his salary should be increased and he should be posted at JNPT work only. Therefore the dispute itself is not deemed fit for adjudication.
16. Even then the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman submitted that the concerned workman should not have been asked to go to new place of work when infact he did not work there and therefore the refusal of the management to continue him to give work at the same place where he was working itself amount to oral termination.
17. It is not possible to accept the view propounded by the Learned Counsel for the concerned workman / applicant in view of the fact that he was asked to resume the duties vide letter dt. 20.7.11 of the company and even he was sent notice dt. 22.8.11 informing that the concerned workman Mr. Shankar Sadashiv Chavan is not reporting for duty without permission since 1.5.11 and inspite of these letters the workman did not report for work. It is the look out of the company where the workman should be asked to work. It is in the circumstances submission of the Learned Counsel for the management is that due to exigency of work the concerned workman was asked to work at their airport office, near airport for which no airport entry pass is required but the concerned workman did not report for work. It is in that circumstances again it will have to be said that there was no reason for the concerned workman not to report for duty at airport office of the company on the ground that no airport permit was issued to him. The fact remains that the concerned workman on his own remained absent for work without reporting for work and therefore the contention of the management that services never came to be terminated appears legal and proper.
18. It will have to be said therefore that the services of the concerned workman have not been terminated by the management since he himself remained absent and did not report for work. When there is no termination of service of the concerned workman by the management there is no question of his reinstatement with full back wages as prayed for. Issue No. 1 & 2 are therefore answered accordingly as indicated against each of them in terms of above observations.
Issue No.3.
19. So far this issue is concerned, the concerned workman claims that there was Memorandum of settlement which is applicable to all the employers of the Custom House Agents including respondent No.1 in respect of basic pay and DA and other allowances and benefits etc. and therefore he being the senior clerk and completed 10 years of service is entitled for the pay scale of Rs.2690-65-3015-80-3415-90-3865-100-4365 with DA along with FDA and other additional allowances & other benefits. Since he has not received the arrears of salary, DA & other benefits on the basis of Memorandum of settlement from 1990 till date he is entitled to arrears in pay differences as per bipartite agreement.
20. On going through the Memorandum of settlement it appears that it was Memorandum of settlement u/s. 12 (3) of I.D. Act during conciliation proceedings in the matter of industrial dispute raised by the workman represented through Transport & Dock Workers Union against Custom House Agents, Bombay represented throughout Bombay Custom House Agents Association. Witness examined on behalf of the concerned workman namely Wilson Johnson himself admitted in his cross examination that he was working with Proprietor of M/S. A.B. Paul & Co. as a Custom Clerk but he has not been given benefit of the said agreement in between Bombay Custom House Agents Association and Transport & Dock Workers Union.
21. Precisely, therefore it is the case of the management that respondent No.1, M/S. A.B. Paul & Co. is not the member of Bombay Custom House Agents Association and as such the agreement is not binding and not applicable to them. It is in that circumstances it appears that Wilson Johnson who was also working with respondent No.1 was not given the benefit of the said agreement. As such the applicant is not also entitled to claim the arrears in pay difference as per the said agreement. This issue is also answered accordingly in the negative.
Issue No.4 & 5.
22. In view of my findings to the above issues, the concerned workman / applicant is not entitled to any relief as claimed. The reference is liable to be rejected with no order as to costs. Hence order.
ORDER
Reference is rejected with no order as to costs.
Date: 14.01.2019
M. V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer3472 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-796.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd] lhth,p,l ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 127@201@201@201@2016666) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 08-03-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.796.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 127/2016) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director, CGHS New Delhi & others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 08.03-2019.
[No. L-42011/30/2014–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR
COURT No. 1 DELHI
ID No.127/2016
Shri Ram Chander & others
…Workmen
Versus
The Director,
CGHS & others
The Management,
IAP Company Pvt. Ltd.
The Management of
National Informatics Centre Services
The Management of
National Informatics Centre Services Inc.
The appropriate Government, vide Order No.L-42012/30/2014-IR(DU) dated 15.7.2014 referred a dispute for adjudication, terms of which is as under:
'Whether the services of the workmen Shri Ram Chander & others can be regularized in the establishment of CGHS as they have been working in the establishment since 5-7 years on continuous basis? If not, what relief the workmen concerned are entitled to?'
2. During pendency of the above dispute before this Tribunal, Shri Suresh Kumar Sharma, Ms.Syeda Zohra Nasima Shri Y. Suresh, Ms. G. Geeta Rani, Ms.Y. Sunitha, Shri M. Nagendeer, Shri E. Srisailam, Shri Chinna Swamy, Shri K. Ravi, Shri B. Thyagaraju, Shri G. Naresh Kumar, Ms.G. Archana, Shri A Lazaman Rao, Shri Sharavana Kumar, Shri Rama Krishna Reddy, Shri Raghuvardhan Reddy and Shri Yakaiah, all DEO/DMA were not allowed to perform their duties and new DEOs were appointed in their place by the Assistant Director, CGHS, Hyderabad. Additional Director:Kolkata was resorting to harassing the women employees by transferring them to far off places. Ms.Uma Das, one of the 267 workmen working with CGHS Kolkata, was scolded on 13.01.2015 and asked to leave the office immediately. She was not allowed to join duties thereafter. The Additional Director:Nagpur was also continuously harassing the 16 workmen under them and new LDCs have joined in their place.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 34732. Complaint, moved by Shri Ram Chander & others, was registered as an industrial dispute, notice of which complaint was sent to CGHS for submission of statement of defence.
3. Reply was filed by CGHS averring therein that the workmen are employees of empanelled agencies of National Informatics Centre Services Inc. which is a section 25 company under National Informatics Centre Services a department of Ministry of Communication & Information Technology. Rail India Techno Economic Services managerial support, including services of Data Entry Operators has been outsourced by CGHS to NIC/NICSI for its computerization project, through a tripartite MOU. The arrangement does not make CGHS directly responsible for regular/timely payment of salaries of the workmen. CGHS has cleared all claims of NICSI, including payment of salary of Data Entry Operators from June 2015. Payment to NICSI regarding payment of salary for July 2015 and August 2015 is in process and would be paid in due course of time.
4. Further, the management has taken various preliminary objections, inter alia of the workmen not approaching the Tribunal with clean hands, the Tribunal having no jurisdiction to entertain the present petition, in the absence of vacant post no appointments can be made and the case being barred by Doctrine of res-subjudice Section 10 and doctrine of res-judicata Section 11 CPC etc. On merits it has been averred that CGHS has initiated computerization project of its dispensaries with a pilot project at CGHS Wellness Centre, Laxmi Nagar and was extended to other Wellness Centres as well. The project was outsourced for implementation and operationalization to National Informatics Centre Services and a tripartite memorandum was signed between the CGHS, National Informatics Centre Services and National Informatics Centre Services Inc. National Informatics Centre Services Inc. was to provide support services for programming and other activities through empanelled agencies of National Informatics Centre Services and CGHS had nothing to do with the process of recruitment of manpower. The project was completed in 3 years; however, for stablization of the project, extension of engagement of DEOs was granted by the competent authority. Extension of service was agreed by Integrated Finance Division till 31.03.2014 but it was observed that the services of LDCs be utilized for computer related jobs and the service of DEOs should not be extended beyond 31.03.2014. CGHS has denied the other material averments contained in the statement of defence.
5. Reply was also filed on behalf of M/s IAP Company Pvt. Ltd. to the statement of claim. It is contended that the averments, contentions, statements and submissions are contrary to and not in consonance with the present reply and is specifically denied. The present claim is not maintainable as the claimants are neither workmen nor CGHS is an industry as per provisions of the ID Act. The claimants were hired on the basis of work order received from time to time with effect from 01.04.2013 till 31.03.2017 from National Informatics Centre Services Inc. M/s IAP Company Pvt. Ltd. has terminated agreement subsequent to its expiry on 31.03.2017. There is no direct relationship of employer and employee between All payments have been received and paid by M/S IAP Company Pvt. Ltd. on the basis of requirement of National Informatics Centre Services Inc, who were having direct control and supervision on the claimant. Finally, it has been submitted that consultancy agreement between M/s IAP Company Pvt. Ltd. and other respondents stood terminated and hence is not a necessary party.
6. Thereafter, on 20.02.2019, it was stated by Shri Kamlesh Kumar Mishra that all the claimants who were terminated during pendency of the dispute before this Tribunal have been reinstated and hence their claim has been satisfied. Statement of Shri Ram Chander, one of the claimants, recorded separately.
7. In view of the fact that the claimants have been reinstated, there remains no grievance between the parties. The claim now stands satisfied and nothing remains to be adjudicated. The statement of Shri Ram Chander, one of the claimants, shall form integral part of the award. An award is accordingly passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
A. C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 23 vizSy] 2019
dk-vk-797.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ
egkizca/kd Hkkjr lapkj fuxe fyfeVsM] ikyuiqj (ch-ds) (xqtjkr)] vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ua- 1] vgenkckn ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 471@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 27-03-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&40012@297@2001&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh. ds. Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh3474 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 23rd April, 2019
S.O.797.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 471/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, No. 1, Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Sub- Divisional Officer (Telegraph), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Palampur (B.K.) (Gujarat) & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 27.03-2019.
[No. L-40012/297/2001–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present : Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 06th March, 2019
Reference: (CGITA) No- 471/2004
1. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Telegraph),
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Telephone Exchange, Near Bus Stand, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 2. The Telecom District Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
Ganj Market, Palanpur (B.K.) – 385001 …First Parties
V/s.
The Org. Secretary, The Association of Railway and Post Employees, 15, Shashi Apartment, Near Anjalee Cinema, Vasna Road, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380007 …Second Party
For the First Parties : Shri H.R. Raval
For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak and Shri Chintan Gohel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/297/2001– IR(DU) dated 11.03.2002 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Telecom District) in terminating the services of Shri Ramji Pal Gopi Pal is legal, proper and justified? If not, to what relief the concerned workman is entitled and what other directions are necessary in the matter?"
1. The reference dates back to 11.03.2002 and received on 05.04.2002 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2. After issuing notice to the parties, second party workman submitted the statement of claim Ex. 7 on 16.08.2002 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 11 on 18.12.2003. Since then the second party workman has not been leading evidence and today on 06.03.2019, Shri Chintan Gohel, the advocate for the second party workman stated that the workman has not been in his contact since long.
3. Thus it appears that the second party workman is not willing to prosecute the case. 4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of in the absence of the evidence of the second party workman with the observation as under: "the action of the management of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Telecom District) in terminating the services of Shri Ramji Pal Gopi Pal is legal, proper and justified."
5. The award is passed accordingly.
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3475
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-798.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ gfYn;k fjQk;ujh ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 09@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&30011@44@2015&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'k]q voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.798.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 09/2016) of the Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s Haldia Refinery and other and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 07.05-2019.
[No. L-30011/44/2015–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 09 of 2016 Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Haldia Refinery AND Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer Appearance: On behalf of the : None Management
AWARD
By Order No.L-30011/44/2015-IR(M) dated 20.01.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. Susanta Kr. Adak, contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, in
denying the nine points of charter ofdemand raised by the union legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the
workmen are entitled to?"
2. After receipt of order of reference, notices were issued to the parties. In compliance to which the management of Haldia Refinery appeared before this Tribunal, but the union instead of appearing and filing statement of claim, moved an application dated 26.07.2018 to the effect that with the pay revision for the subsequent period, the dispute regarding pay revision for the earlier period has become infractuous and there is no justification to continue adjudication of the same. Therefore, the General Secretary of the union requested to dispose of the case in the light of above.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the management of Haldia Refinery has no objection for disposal of the case as no dispute exists.
4. From the perusal of order of reference it transpires that IOCL Thika Mazdoor Union had raised 9 points of charter of demand before the management of M/s. Susanta Kr. Adak which is a contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, but the same was denied by the management resulting in reference of this dispute. As the pay revision has already taken place which was one of the points in the charter of demand and no other point has been pressed by the union, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 2nd May, 2019.
3476 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-799.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ bf.M;u vkW;y dkjiksjs'ku fyfeVsM ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 18@2010) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&30012@16@2009&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.799.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/2010) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 06.05-2019.
[No. L-30012/16/2009–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 18 of 2010
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of Indian Oil Corporation Limited
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the : Mr. R. Talukdar, learned counsel. . Management On behalf of the : Mr. A. Mukherjee, learned counsel. Workmen State: West Bengal. Industry: Petroleum Dated: 24th April, 2019.
AWARD
Brief facts, in the background of which this reference has been made by the Government of India are that the workman concerned, Shri Mantu Das was appointed as Junior Attendant (Service) in Grade-I vide appointment letter dated 01.03.2004. After rendering service for about 10 years by the workman concerned, the management issued a chargesheet against him on the allegation that he had given false declaration of his date of birth and educational qualification. After departmental enquiry the workman was found guilty of the charge leveled against him and on the basis of report of the Enquiry Officer the workman was dismissed from service. Hence he raised industrial dispute which has been referred to this Tribunal for adjudication vide order No. L-30012/16/2009-IR(M) dated 30.11.2009 in the following terms: -
"Whether the action of the management of IOCL, Budge Budge, Kolkata in dismissing Shri Mantu Das,
Jr. Attendant (Service) is justified? What relief the workman concerned is entitled to?"
2. The validity of enquiry was challenged by the workman on the ground that the chargesheet was not correct and was not framed as per provisions of Clause 25 of the Certified Standing Orders , that the workman was not given sufficient opportunity to defend himself and natural justice was denied to him during enquiry. The workman concerned also alleged that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse. The management of the company in a most pre- determined manner with the conspiracy of the union leader terminated the services of the workman.
3. The management filed written statement pleading inter alia that the concerned workman was initially employee as a temporary workman in a canteen of the company. Subsequently he was given probationary permanent employment as per terms and conditions incorporated in the letter dated 21st March, 2003. As the workman did not file attestation[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3477 form at the first instance, the medical board ascertained his date of birth as 16th October, 1960. However, on the request of the workman the date of birth was reviewed to be 16th October, 1962. Thereafter the workman submitted attestation form declaring his date of birth as 16th April, 1968 and also that he had passed Class-VIII examination. However, certain complaints were made by the Petroleum Workers Union whereupon an enquiry was conducted and during enquiry documents were collected from Bawali High School, which mentions date of birth of the workman as 16th February, 1966 and also that he never passed Class-VIII examination. Accordingly, domestic enquiry was initiated. During enquiry the workman admitted the charge leveled against him. Fair opportunity to defend himself was given to the workman. At the end the workman was found guilty at enquiry. Therefore, the disciplinary authority terminated the services of the workman concerned. The appellate authority also upheld the decision of the disciplinary authority.
4. As the validity of enquiry was challenged by the workman, it was taken up as a preliminary issue and decided on 17th December, 2015. The enquiry was held to be legal and valid and also in furtherance of the principles of natural justice.
5. After the domestic enquiry is held to be valid and proper the question crops up for consideration is regarding scope of interference by the Industrial Tribunal. Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides that Industrial Tribunal has power to reappraise the findings of the domestic enquiry. On the basis of Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 it has been submitted that the Industrial Tribunal can set aside the order of discharge or dismissal of the workman concerned and direct reinstatement, if the Tribunal is satisfied that the order of dismissal or discharge was not justified.
6. Scope of judicial review by Industrial Tribunal has been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Nirmala J. Jhala v. State of Gujarat & Another, CDJ 2013 SC 216 in following terms -
"It is settled legal proposition that judicial review is not akin to adjudication on merit by re-appreciating the
evidence as an Appellate Authority. The only consideration the Court/Tribunal has in its judicial review, is to
considerwhether the conclusion is based on evidence on record and supports the findings or whether the
conclusion is based on no evidence. The adequacy or reliability of the evidence is not a matter which can be
permitted to becanvassed before the Court in writ proceedings."
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that
"The decision referred to hereinabove highlights clearly, the parameter of the Court's power of judicial review
of administrative action or decision. An order can be set-aside if it is based on extraneous grounds, or when there is
no grounds at all for passing it or when the grounds are such that, no one can reasonably arrive at the opinion. The
Court does not sit as a Court of Appeal but, it merely reviews the manner in which the decision was made. The Court
will not normally exercise its power of judicial review unless it is found that formation of belief by the statutory authority
suffers from malafides, dishonest/corrupt practice. In other words, the authority mustact in good faith. Neither the
question as to whether there was sufficient evidence before the authority can be raised/examined, nor the question of re-
appreciating the evidence to examine the correctness of the order under challenge. If there are sufficient grounds for
passing an order, then even if one of them is found to be correct, and on its basis the orderimpugned can be passed,
there is no occasion for the Court to interfere."
7. Though the workman concerned has challenged the report of the Enquiry Officer on the ground that the findings in the report are perverse, but no reason has been assigned by the workman concerned as to how the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse. Nowhere in the pleading he has mentioned that whether the Enquiry Officer did not consider his evidence or that considered any inadmissible evidence or that findings are based on extraneous grounds. Contrary to it, as it is evident from the enquiry proceedings, that the workman had himself confessed his guilt in following words:
"At the present juncture I am fully agreed with all the information as has been set by the Company. The date of birth as was declared by me as per direction of the Union, which was finally fixed by the Medical Board constituted by the Company was the same.
In respect of "Qualification" I would like to state that I have read in Class-VIII, but by mistake I have declared as "passed Class-VII", which is a mistake on my part and I full agreed to it."
In view of above confessional statement made by the workman during domestic enquiry, there is no scope to say that findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse.
8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Mihir Kumar Hazara Chowdhury v. Life Insurance Corporation of India & Another, CDJ 2017 SC 1054 has observed as follows:
"31. As held supra, the departmental proceedings were conducted strictly in accordance with law by
following the principle of natural justice in which the appellant duly participated. The appellant neither set up
any defense nor denied the factum of charges, yet the respondent proved the charges with the aid of
relevant evidence, which found acceptance of the Division Bench and this Court too. As an Appellate Court,
3478 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]neither we can sit over thefindings of the Enquiry Officer and find fault in it nor can we re-appreciate the
evidence of witnesses examined in departmental enquiry."
9. Now scrutinizing the facts of the present case it is revealed that the workman concerned has been charged with misconduct. It was alleged that the workman concerned initially did not submit the attestation form annexed to his appointment letter. It is specifically mentioned in the letter that his appointment to the post was subject to his submitting copies of all certificates and testimonials like birth certificate, school leaving certificate, cast certificate etc. alongwith original certificates for verification by the company at the time joining. It is also mentioned that in case any information furnished by the appointee was found to be incorrect or any information relevant for appointment was suppressed, then he will be liable for termination forthwith. It is not disputed that the workman did not submit attestation form, as required. However, as per terms and conditions mentioned in the appointment letter dated 21st March, 2003 a medical board was constituted to determine his date of birth which was found to be 16th October, 1960. It is also not disputed that subsequently on request of the workman concerned the medical board again reviewed his date of birth to be 16th October, 1962. After all these exercise, the workman concerned submitted his attestation form declaring his date of birth 16th April, 1968. He also declared himself to have passed Class-VIII examination. The declaration made in attestation form regarding his date of birth and also regarding his educational qualification were found to be false after collection of document from Bawali High School from where the workman concerned admitted to have passed Class-VIII examination. As per Clause 25(d) of the Standing Orders theft, fraud or dishonesty in connection with the employer's business or property is misconduct. The act of the workman in suppressing his educational qualification and thereby obtaining employment in the company certainly comes within the term fraud. It has also been admitted by the workman concerned in his confessional statement that by mistake he mentioned his educational qualification as Class 'VIII passed'. The date of birth was also admitted to be wrong, though on instruction of union. He never set up any defence or denied the factum of charge leveled against him, despite that the management proved the charge of misconduct against the workman concerned.
10. However, even if there is no illegality or perversity in the findings of the Enquiry Officer, the Tribunal can interfere, if it is satisfied that the order of dismissal or discharge was not justified. In catena of cases it has been held that the action of the management must conform with the proportionality of the gravity of offence.
11. In Muriadih Colliery v. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, 2005 (3) SCC 331 the law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as follows –
"It is well established principle in law that in a given circumstance it is open to the Industrial Tribunal acting
under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has the jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment
awarded in the domestic enquiry for good and valid reasons. If the Tribunal decides to interfere with such
punishment, it should bear in mind the principle of proportionality between the gravity of the offence and
thestringency ofthe punishment."
12. In Life Insurance Corporation of India v. R. Dandapani, 2006(108) FLR 953 it has been observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court that the Tribunal has power to reduce the quantum of punishment, but power under Section 11-A has to be exercised judiciously and the Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court Is expected to interfere with the decision of the management only when it is satisfied that the punishment imposed by the management is wholly and shockingly disproportionate to the degree of guilt of the workman concerned.
13. In Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals v. M. Mani & Others, 2018 LLR 2(SC) Hon'ble the Apex Court has held that where a departmental enquiry is held to be legal and proper then the only question remains for consideration is whether the punishment of dismissal is required any interference. Relevant portion of the judgment may be quoted as below:
"18. In other words, the Labour Court should have then confined itsenquiry to examine only one limited
question as to whether the punishment given to the respondents was, in any way, disproportionate to the gravity
of the charge leveled against them and this, the LabourCourt should have examined by taking recourse to the
provisions ofSection 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. ………"
14. Thus power to interfere with the quantum of punishment can be exercised by the Tribunal only when it is found to be grossly disproportionate. In the present case the workman concerned was charged with misconduct on the allegation that he suppressed his date of birth and educational qualification and got the employment. It has been specifically mentioned in the appointment letter that in case the workman is found to have suppressed above facts, he shall be liable for termination. An employee irrespective of his rank and designation is expected to be honest in discharge of his duties. An employee deliberately being dishonest ultimately spoils the environment of the workplace. Where the very basis of obtaining employment is dishonesty or fraud by the employee, the management is in all likelihood bound to loose trust in its employees and where there is breakdown in the trust and confidence, the employer is in its all fairness entitled to do away with such an employee. Hence, in above circumstances, the punishment awarded to the workman concerned cannot be said to be disproportionate to the charge of misconduct. Hence the action of the management of IOCL, Budge Budge, Kolkata in dismissing Shri Mantu Das, Junior Attendant (Service) is justified. Workman concerned is not entitled to any relief.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 347915. Reference is answered accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata, The 24th April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-800.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ gfYn;k fjQk;ujh ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 11@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&30011@48@2015&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.800.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 11/2016) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s Haldia Refinery and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06.05.2019.
[No. L-30011/48/2015–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 11 of 2016
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of Haldia Refinery
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra Presiding Officer Appearance: On behalf of the : Mr. N.K. Mehta, Ld. Counsel with Mr. S. Sharma, learned Management Counsel for IOCL, Haldia Refinery.
On behalf of the : None. Workmen
State: West Bengal. Industry: Petroleum.
AWARD
By Order No.L-30011/48/2015-IR(M) dated 20.01.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. Haldia Star Builders contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, in
denying the nine points of charter of demand raised by the union legal and/or justified? If not, what relief the
workmen are entitled to?"
2. After receipt of order of reference, notices were issued to the parties. In compliance to which the management of Haldia Refinery appeared before this Tribunal, but the union instead of appearing and filing statement of claim, moved an application dated 26.07.2018 to the effect that with the pay revision for the subsequent period, the dispute regarding pay revision for the earlier period has become infractuous and there is no justification to continue adjudication of the same. Therefore, the General Secretary of the union requested to dispose of the case in the light of above.
3480 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]3. Learned counsel appearing for the management of Haldia Refinery has no objection for disposal of the case as no dispute exists.
4. From the perusal of order of reference it transpires that IOCL Thika Mazdoor Union had raised 9 points of charter of demand before the management of M/s. Haldia Star Builders which is a contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, but the same was denied by the management resulting in reference of this dispute. As the pay revision has already taken place which was one of the points in the charter of demand and no other point has been pressed by the union, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 23rd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-801.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ gfYn;k fjQk;ujh ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 10@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&30011@47@2015&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.801.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 10/2016) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Haldia Refinery and other and their workman, which was received by the Central Government on 06.05.2019.
[No. L-30011/47/2015–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 10 of 2016
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of
Haldia Refinery
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the : Mr. N.K. Mehta, Ld. Counsel with Mr. S. Sharma, learned
Management Counsel for IOCL, Haldia Refinery.
On behalf of the : None Workmen
State: West Bengal. Industry: Petroleum
AWARD
By Order No. L-30011/47/2015-IR(M) dated 20.01.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3481"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. Techno Projects, contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, in
denying the nine points of charter of demand raised by the union legal and/or justified? If not, what relief
theworkmen are entitled to?"
2. After receipt of order of reference, notices were issued to the parties. In compliance to which the management of Haldia Refinery appeared before this Tribunal, but the union instead of appearing and filing statement of claim, moved an application dated 26.07.2018 to the effect that with the pay revision for the subsequent period, the dispute regarding pay revision for the earlier period has become infractuous and there is no justification to continue adjudication of the same. Therefore, the General Secretary of the union requested to dispose of the case in the light of above.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the management of Haldia Refinery has no objection for disposal of the case as no dispute exists.
4. From the perusal of order of reference it transpires that IOCL Thika Mazdoor Union had raised 9 points of charter of demand before the management of M/s. Techno Projects which is a contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, but the same was denied by the management resulting in reference of this dispute. As the pay revision has already taken place which was one of the points in the charter of demand and no other point has been pressed by the union, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata, The 23rd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-802.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ gfYn;k fjQk;ujh ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 07@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&30011@38@2015&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.802.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 07/2016) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Haldia Refinery and other and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 06.05.2019.
[No. L-30011/38/2015–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 07 of 2016
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of
Haldia Refinery
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer Appearance: On behalf of the : Mr. N.K. Mehta, Ld. Counsel with Mr. S. Sharma, learned Management Counsel for IOCL, Haldia Refinery.
3482 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]On behalf of the : None.
AWARD
By Order No. L-30011/38/2015-IR(M) dated 07.01.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of the Management of M/s. Bargabhima Nursery, contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, in
denying the nine points of charter of demand raised by the union legal and/or justified? If not, what relief
theworkmen are entitled to?"
2. After receipt of order of reference, notices were issued to the parties. In compliance to which the management of Haldia Refinery appeared before this Tribunal, but the union instead of appearing and filing statement of claim, moved an application dated 26.07.2018 to the effect that with the pay revision for the subsequent period, the dispute regarding pay revision for the earlier period has become infractuous and there is no justification to continue adjudication of the same. Therefore, the General Secretary of the union requested to dispose of the case in the light of above.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the management of Haldia Refinery has no objection for disposal of the case as no dispute exists.
4. From the perusal of order of reference it transpires that IOCL Thika Mazdoor Union had raised 9 points of charter of demand before the management of M/s. Bargabhima Nursery which is a contractor of IOCL, Haldia Refinery, but the same was denied by the management resulting in reference of this dispute. As the pay revision has already taken place which was one of the points in the charter of demand and no other point has been pressed by the union, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 23rd April, 2019
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-803.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ lksek baMLVªh;y lsD;wfjVh lfoZl ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 18@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@2@2016&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.803.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 18/2016) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service and other and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 06.05.2019.
[No. L-26011/2/2016–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3483ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 18 of 2016
Parties: Employers in relation to the management of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer Appearance:
On behalf of the : Mr. Suvadip Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for Management M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service.
None for others.
On behalf of the : None Workmen
Dated : 23nd April, 2019
AWARD
By Order No. L-26011/2/2016-IR(M) dated 08.02.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Services, contractor of M/s. TM International Logistics
Limited is justified by termination of services of Md. Jabbar Ali Mallik is legal and/or justified? If not, what
relief the workmen are entitled to?"
2. When the case is taken up for hearing on 16.04.2019, none appeared for the parties, except M/s. Soma International Security Service. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since 19.02.2016 and in spite of all the opportunities, neither the union/workman has not filed its statement of claim, nor the managements have filed their respective written statement to proceed further with the case.
3. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union/workman has no grievance at present in respect of termination of service of Shri Md. Burhan Ali Mallik as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer Dated, Kolkata, The 23rd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-804 .—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ lksek baMLVzh;y lsD;wfjVh lfoZl ,oa vU; ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 17@2016) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 06-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&26011@1@2016&vkbZ vkj (,e)]
Mh. ds. fgeka'kq] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.804.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 17/2016) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service and other and their workman which was received by the Central Government on 06.05-2019.
[No. L-26011/1/2016–IR (M)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
3484 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 17 of 2016
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer Appearance:
On behalf of the : Mr. Suvadip Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for Management M/s. Soma Industrial Security Service.
None for others.
On behalf of the : None Workmen Dated: 23nd April, 2019
AWARD
By Order No.L-26011/1/2016-IR(M) dated 08.02.2016 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
"Whether the action of M/s. Soma Industrial Security Services, contractor of M/s. TM International Logistics
Limited is justified by termination of services of Md. Burhan Ali Mallik is legal and/or justified? If not, what
relief the workmen are entitled to?"
2. When the case is taken up for hearing on 16.04.2019, none appeared for the parties, except M/s. Soma International Security Service. It transpires from record that though this reference is pending in this Tribunal since 19.02.2016 and inspite of all the opportunities, neither the union/workman has not filed its statement of claim, nor the managements have filed their respective written statement to proceed further with the case.
3. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union/workman has no grievance at present in respect of termination of service of Shri Md. Burhan Ali Mallik as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
4. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata, The 23rd April, 2019.
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-805.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funsZ'kd jk"Vªh; izca/ku d`"kh ekdZsfVax ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&a Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 4@2006) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&42012@2@2005&vkbZ vkj (lh,e)] jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O. 805.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 4/2006) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the the management of M/s. Director National Institute of Management Agriculture marketing and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 07.05-2019.
[No. L-42012/2/2005–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3485 vuqca/k
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 4@2006
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh
ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
lqjsUnz xqtZj iq= Jh HkTtwjke xqtZj fuoklh& IykV ua- lh&5] f'ko dkWyksuh] ,;jiksVZ ds lkeus] ftyk& t;iqj jktLFkku
& izkFkhZx.k
cuke
1- funs'kd] us'kuy bULV;wV vkWQ eSustesUV ,xzhdYpj ekdZsfVax]
Vksad jksM] cEckyk] lkxkausj] t;iqj
2- Jh MkDVj dey ekFkwj izksxzke dks&vksfMusVj fof/ku]
ih-th-ih-,-ch-,e-] t;iqj
& vizkFkhZx.k
mifLFkr %&
izkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh dqyfni flag iqfu;ka & izfrfuf/k
vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh ih- ds- ik.Ms & izfrfuf/k
vf/kfu.kZ;
fnukad % 29- 03- 2019
1- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 14-12-2005 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ¼ftls vkxkeh pj.kksa esa vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 mi/kkjk ¼1½ o 2 ¼,½ ds vUrXkZr iznRr 'kfDr;ksa ds vuqlj.k esa fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks vf/kfu.k;Zu gsrq lEizsf"kr fd;kA Whether the action of the management of Nationnal Institute of Agricultural Marketing, Jaipur in terminating the services of Sh. Surendra Gurjar, Xerox Operator w.e.f. 19/09/2003 is legal and justified ? If not, to what relief the claimant is entitled to and from which date ?
2- lanfHkZr fookn izkIr gksus ds mijkUr i{kdkjksa dks uksfVl tkjh dj izkFkhZ dks nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djus dk funsZ'k fn;k x;kA
3- bl uksfVl ds vuqikyu esa fnukad 13-2-2006 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dk dFku gS fd vizkFkhZx.k vkS|ksfxd laLFkku dh ifjHkk"kk esa gS vkSj blesa dk;Zjr izkFkhZ Jfed dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr ftjksDl vkWijsVj ij vizkFkhZx.k }kjk fnukad 30-4-2002 dks vkns'k tkjh dj dh FkhA ;g in LFkk;h izd`fr dk gSA fnukad 19-09-2003 dks fcuk dksbZ dkj.k crk;s ,oa fcuk uksfVl fn;s vizkFkhZx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dks lsoki`Fkd dj fn;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks dksbZ uksfVl vFkok {kfriwfrZ Hkh ugha nh xbZA izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfed dk;Z dj jgs Fks ftUgsa lsokeqDr ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds LFkku ij vizkFkhZx.k us eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;.k ls dke fy;kA lsoki`Fkd djus ls iwoZ izR;sd o"kZ esa izkFkhZ us 240 fnu ls vf/kd dk;Z fd;k gSA vizkFkhZx.k dk ;g d`R; vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku gSa rFkk vuqfpr Je vH;kl dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA izkFkhZ us ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dh Fkh tks 16-08-2004 dks oSdfYid mipkj miyC/k gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dj nh xbZA vr% izkFkhZ dk nkok Lohdkj dj lsokeqfDr vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2003 dks voS/k ?kksf"kr dj izkFkhZ dks fu;fer djrs gq, lHkh ykHkksa lfgr fu;qfDr fnykbZ tkosaA
4- fnukad 13-2-2006 dks foi{khx.k dh vkSj ls okn dk izR;qRrj izLrqr djrs gq, nkos ds rF;ksa dks vLohdkj fd;k x;kA foi{kh dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr ih-th-ch-,-ch-,e- lsy esa gqbZ Fkh tks izksxzke ckm.M+ FkhA vko';drk u jgus ij ftjksDl vkWijsVj dk in lekIr djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;kA ;g ekeyk vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugha vkrk gSA izkFkhZ Jfed ugha gS D;ksafd lsokeqfDr ds le; mldk osru 1600 :i;s ekfld ls vf/kd FkkA izkFkhZ dks fnukad 30-4-2002 dks vkns'k }kjk 1-5-2002 ls fu;qfDr nh xbZA izkFkhZ dks fnukad 19-09-2003 ls lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;k x;kA mlh le; rRdky ,d ekg ds uksfVl ds ,sot esa osru rFkk NaVuh eqvkotk dqy 6400 :i;s pSd ds ek/;e ls ns fn;s x;sA izkFkhZ us rRi'pkr uks&Mwt izek.k i= izLrqr fd;k bl izdkj izkFkhZ us feF;k rF; of.kZr fd;s gSaA izkFkhZ dh lsok lekfIr iw.kZr% oS/k gSA foi{kh }kjk dksbZ vuqfpr Je vH;kl3486 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ us 6400 :i;s dk Hkqxrku cSad ls izkIr dj fy;k FkkA vr% izkFkhZ dk nkok vLohdkj fd;k tkoasA
5- izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls 21-3-2006 dks vfrfjDr dFku izLrqr djrs gq, foi{khx.k ds oknksRrj esa fd;s x;s dFkuksa dks xyr crk;k x;k vkSj ;g dgk x;k fd ftjksDl e'khu dk dk;Z vkt Hkh tkjh gS ftls eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;.k 'kekZ ls djok;k tk jgk gSA
6- izkFkhZ us vius lk{; esa Loa; izkFkhZ lqjsUnz xqtZj dks ifjf{kr fd;k rFkk izys[kh; lk{; izn'kZ MCY;w&1 ls MCY;w&5 rd izLrqr dhA
7- foi{khx.k us vius lk{; esa foosd prqoZsnh rFkk dey ekFkqj dks ijhf{kr fd;kA izys[kh; lk{; esa izn'kZ ,e&1 ls ,e&7 izys[k iznf'kZr fd;sA
8- fnukad 13 ,oa 14-3-2019 dks eSuas mHk;i{k ds fo}ku izfrfuf/kx.k ds ijLij fojks/kh rdZ lqus vkSj miyC/k lk{; dk ifj'khyu fd;kA
9- izkFkhZ dh vkSj ls ;g dgk x;k fd foi{khx.k ;g Lohdkj djrs gS fd 1-5-2002 ls 19-9-2003 rd izkFkhZ foi{kh dh lsok esa jgk vkSj mlus 240 fnu ls vf/kd ,d o"kZ dh vof/k esa dk;Z fd;kA fdUrq izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd fd;s tkus ls iwoZ foi{khx.k us lsokeqfDr ds dkj.k n'kkZrs gq, dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k vkSj u gh dksbZ uksfVl osru {kfriwfrZ jkf'k vkSj cdk;k 19 fnu ds osru dk Hkqxrku fd;k bl fLFkfr esa foi{khx.k }kjk /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku fd;k x;k gSA mUgksus lk{; esa ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;.k vc Hkh dk;Zjr gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ us vius nkos dks iw.kZr% izekf.kr fd;k gS vr% mls iw.kZ foxr osru lfgr lsokeqfDr dh frfFk ls lsok esa cgky fd;k tkosaA mUgksuas vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa fuEukafdr U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;s %&
¼1½ ¼2008½ s.c.c. 248] jktLFkku yfyr dyk vdkneh cuke jk/ks';ke
¼2½ ¼1994½ L.L.R. 369 LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku cuke fel- m"kk yksdokuh o vU;
10- fo}ku izfrfuf/k foi{khx.k us izkFkhZ ds rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, dgk gS fd izkFkhZ us vius nkos esa foi{khx.k }kjk uksfVl osru vkSj izfrdj jkf'k dk Hkqxrku foi{khx.k }kjk u fd;k tkuk feF;k of.kZr fd;k gS tcfd og vius lk{; esa 6400 :i;s dh jkf'k mlds [kkrs esa tek gksuk Lohdkj djrk gSA izkFkhZ ds [kkrs esa rhu gtkj :i;s ekfld dh nj ls ,d ekg dk uksfVl osru] ekg esa 26 fnu dh nj ls x.kuk djrs gq, 15 fnu dk NaVuh izfrdj 1731 :i;s vkSj cdk;k osru 1669 :i;s dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks 19-9-2003 dks gh pSd ds ek/;e ls dj fn;k x;k] ftls izkFkhZ us Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gSA ;fn cdk;k osru dh jkf'k dk Hkqxrku de Hkh gqvk gks rks Hkh uksfVl osru vkSj NaVuh izfrdj dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks dj fn;k tkuk /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ vf/kfu;e dh vis{kkvksa dh iwfrZ dj nsrk gS blfy;s izkFkhZ fdlh vuqrks"k dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
11- eSuas mHk;i{k ds rdksZa] izLrqr fd;s x;s fof/kd n`"VkUrksa esa ikfjr fof/k ,oa lk{; ij xEHkhjrk ls fopkj fd;kA bl izdj.k esa fuEukafdr fcUnq fopkjkFkZ mRiUu gq, gS %&
fcUnq la[;k ¼1½ D;k foi{khx.k us fnukad 19-09-2003 dks izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd djrs gq, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds vkns'kkRed izko/kkuksa dk vuqikyu ugha fd;k \ blfy;s izkFkhZ dh NaVuh voS/k gS \
fcUnq la[;k ¼2½ D;k izkFkhZ dks lsoki`Fkd djrs le; izkFkhZ ls dfu"Brj Jfedksa dks lsok ls i`Fkd ugha fd;k x;k \
fcUnq la[;k ¼3½ vuqrks"k \
12- fcUnq la[;k ¼1½ izkFkhZ us vius nkos ds vfHkdFku esa ;g dgk gS fd lsoki`Fkd djus ls igys vizkFkhZx.k }kjk mls dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;k x;k vkSj u gh dksbZ {kfr eqvkotk fn;k vkSj lsok i`FkDdj.k vkns'k Hkh rqjUr miyC/k ugha djok;k---------- ,d ekg ds uksfVl ds cnys osru Hkh Vs.Mj ugha fd;k x;kA blh dze esa izkFkhZ lqjsUnz xqtZj us vius lk{; esa l'kiFk ;g dgk gS fd vizkFkhZx.k }kjk fcuk dksbZ dkj.k crk;s o uksfVl fn;s fnukad 19-09-2003 dks mls lsoki`Fkd dj fn;kA lsoki`FkDdj.k dk dksbZ dkj.k vkns'k esa ugh fy[kkA dfFkr NaVuh eqvkotk o uksfVl dh tks jkf'k ckn esa nh xbZ og Hkh de gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ ds vfHkopuksa ,oa lk{; esa lkjoku vUrj ,oa fojks/kkHkkl n`f"Vxr gksrs gSA
13- izkFkhZ Loa; us lsoki`FkDdj.k vkns'k izn'kZ MCY;q&3 lk{; esa iznf'kZr fd;k gSA ;g vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2003 dks gh tkjh fd;k x;k gSA foi{khx.k us blh vkns'k dks izn'kZ ,e&1 ds :i esa lk{; esa iznf'kZr fd;k gS ftl ij ^,^ ls ^ch^ LFkku ij izkFkhZ ds 19-9-2003 ds fnukafdr gLrk{kj gSaA izkFkhZ us vius izfrijh{k.k esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izn'kZ ,e&1 ij ^,^ ls ^ch^ LFkku ij mlh ds gLrk{kj gaS tks fnukad 19-09-2003 dks fd;s FksA izkFkhZ us iqu% viuk dFku la'kksf/kr djrs gq, ;g dgk gS fd ;g gLrk{kj mlls ,d [kkyh dkxt ij nckc esa djok;s FksA esjs vfHker ls izkFkhZ dk ;g i'pkrorhZ dFku fdlh izdkj fo'oluh; ugha gS D;ksafd bl izdkj nckc esa [kkyh dkxtksa ij gLrk{kj djokus dk vk{ksi izkFkhZ us vius vfHkopuksa esa ugha fd;k gSA vfHkopu ds vHkko esa nh xbZ lk{; fdlh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3487 izdkj xzkg; ugha gSA blds vfrfjDr foi{khx.k us izn'kZ ,e&2 vns;rk izek.k i= lk{; esa iznf'kZr fd;k gS ftl ij Hkh izkFkhZ us Loa; ds gLrk{kj gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA izn'kZ ,e&2 vns;rk izek.k i= izkFkhZ }kjk foi{kh ls 22-09-2003 dks izkIr djuk bl rF; dk iq"V izek.k gS fd izkFkhZ us izn'kZ ,e&1 lsoki`FkDdj.k vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2003 dks ghA izkIr dj fy;k Fkk vkSj mleas fn;s x;s funsZ'k ds vuqikyu esa gh izn'kZ ,e&2 vns;rk izek.k i= izkFkhZ us izkIr fd;kA
14- izkFkhZ us ;g Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gS fd 6400 :i;s dh jkf'k mlds [kkrsa esa tek gks x;h Fkh fdUrq ;g jkf'k de gSA foi{kh ds izys[k izn'kZ ,e&3 ¼cSad dk i=½ ls Hkh ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ dks Hkqxrku gsrq fn;s x;s psd dh /kujkf'k 6400 :i;s fnukad 22-09-2003 dks izkFkhZ ds [kkrsa esa vkgfjr dj yh xbZ FkhA foi{kh ds lk{kh Jh foosd prqosZnh us vius lk{; esa izn'kZ ,e&1 vkns'k fnukad 19-09-2003 ds lkFk gh 6400 :i;s dk psd izkFkhZ dks fn;k tkuk izekf.kr djrs gq, ml ij ^,^ ls ^ch^ gLrk{kj izkFkhZ }kjk izkfIr Lo:i djuk dgk gSA ;g rF; lk{; ds foospu ds i'pkr fdlh izdkj [kf.Mr ugha gqvk gSA
15- izkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k dk ;g rdZ Hkh gS fd ;fn 6400 :i;s dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks gksuk eku Hkh fy;k tk;s rks uksfVl osru] {kfriwfrZ vkSj 19 fnu ds osru dh cdk;k jkf'k dk iw.kZ Hkqxrku u gksus ls vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dh vuqikyuk izekf.kr ugha gksrh gSA blds foijhr foi{kh ds izfrfuf/k us ,d ekg ds uksfVl dh ,ot esa ,d ekg dk osru 3000 :i;s] 15 fnu ds osru ds cjkcj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 1731 :i;s rFkk 19 fnu ds osru dh jkf'k ftldk ;ksx 6400 :i;s gS] dk Hkqxrku] djrs gq, /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dh ikyuk fd;k tkuk dgkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd cdk;k osru dh jkf'k ;fn dqN de Hkh nh xbZ gks rks og /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds izko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS D;ksafd uksfVl osru o {kfriwfrZ dh iw.kZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku rks fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gSA
16- mHk;i{k ds ijLij fojks/kh rdksZa rFkk lk{; ij euu ds mijkUr ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd fnukad 19-09- 2003 dks izn'kZ MCY;w&3 lsok lekfIr vkns'k izkFkhZ dks 6400 :i;s ds ,d pSd la[;k 32107 fnukad 19-09-2003 ds lkFk] foi{kh us ns fn;kA bl vkns'k ,oa pSd dh izkfIr Lo:i izkFkhZ us vkns'k izn'kZ MCY;w&3 dh ,d izfr ij Loa; ds fnukafdr gLrk{kj fd;sA izn'kZ ,e&1 ds ek/;e ls izkFkhZ us lsokeqfDr dk vkns'k] vkns'k dh frFkh fnukad 19-09- 2003 dks gh 6400 :i;s ds ,d & ,d pSd lfgr izkIr fd;k vkSj Loa; ds [kkrsa esa pSd tek djok;kA fnukad 22-09-2003 dks ;g /kujkf'k izkFkhZ ds [kkrs esa vkgfjr@tek gqbZA lsok lekfIr dh frfFk dk gh fof/k ds vuq:i ns; /kujkf'k dks pSd ;k cSad M~kQV }kjk izsf"kr fd;k tkuk /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa dk lE;~d vuqikyu izekf.kr gksrk gSA
17- vc ;g n`"VO; gS fd D;k foi{kh }kjk 6400 :i;s dh /kujkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks fof/k ds vuq:i uksfVl osru rFkk {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku gS\ izkFkhZ us Loa; dgk gS fd mls 3000 :i;s ekfld osru feyrk FkkA bl nj ls lax.kuk djus ij ,d ekg dh vof/k ds uksfVl dh ,ot esa fn;s x;s osru 3000 :i;s] lsok dh vof/k ¼1-5-2002 ls 19-9-2003 rd½ ,d o"kZ 4 ekg 19 fnu dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ns; {kfriwfrZ dh jkf'k 15 fnu ds rqY; osru dh jkf'k gSA foi{kh ds izfrfuf/k us ;|fi {kfriwfrZ dh jkf'k dh x.kuk esa ekfld osru dks 26 ls foHkkftr dj 15 ls xq.kk djus ij 1730 :i;s 76 iSls ¼1731½ {kfriwfrZ dk Hkqxrku fd;k gS rFkk cdk;k osru dh jkf'k 1669 :i;s nsuk dgk gS] fdUrq foi{kh ds lk{; eas bl Hkqxrku dk dksbZ fooj.k izkIr ugha gqvk gSA
18- ekuuh; dydRrk mPp U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; ¼Loa; vf/kdj.k }kjk½ 2001 ¼89½ ,Q-,y-vkj- 192 iSfjt ¼dydRrk½ ,Eiykf;t ;wfu;u cuke FkMZ b.M~LV~h;y fV~C;wuy o vU; esa ;g ekxZn'kZu fn;k gS fd {kfriwfrZ dh jkf'k dh x.kuk djrs le; osru dks 26 ls foHkkftr djuk rFkk 15 ls xq.kk djuk okfUNr ugah gS D;ksafd 26 ls foHkkftr djus dk vf/ker ekuuh; ckWEcs o enzkl mPp U;k;ky;ksa us lokZsPp U;k;ky; }kjk xzsP;wfV Hkqxrku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4 ¼2½ ds vUrxZr nSfud etnwjh dh x.kuk fd;s tkus ds lUnHkZ esa fn;k FkkA bl vk/kkj ij xzsP;wfV Hkqxrku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4 ¼2½ esa la'kks/ku Hkh fd;k tk pqdk gS tc fd bl izdkj dk la'kks/ku vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e esa vc rd ugha fd;k gSA bl fof/kd fLFkfr esa 15 fnu osru ds rqY; {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dh x.kuk gsrq ekfld osru dks 26 ds LFkku ij 30 lss foHkkftr djuk ,oa 15 ls xq.kk djuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
19- bl rF;kRed ,oa fof/kd ifjn`'; esa {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dh lax.kuk 3,000 x 15/30 = 1500 mfpr gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ dks ns; dqy jkf'k dk fooj.k fuEukauqlkj visf{kr gS %
¼1½ uksfVl ds ,sot esa uksfVl osru-----3]000 :i;s ¼2½ 15 fnu osru ds rqY; {kfriwfrZ jkf'k---------1]500 :i;s ¼3½ 19 fnu ds cdk;k osru dh jkf'k 1]900 :i;s ;ksx 6]400 :i;sA foi{kh }kjk mDr 6]400 :i;s dk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ dks fnukad 19-09-2003 dks fn;s x;s lsokeqfDr vkns'k ds lkFk gh psd }kjk fn;k tkuk izekf.kr gS ftldk Hkqxrku izkFkhZ us izkIr dj fy;k gSA
20- izkFkhZ us vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa jktLFkku yfyr dyk vdkneh cuke jk/ks';ke dk fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;k gSA bl fu.kZ; esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us ;g dgk gS fd vf/kfu;e /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ dh mi/kkjk ¼aa½ o ¼b½ dh vuqikyuk fd;k tkuk oS/k NaVuh gsrq vko';d gSA bu izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk gsrq ,d ekg dh vof/k dk fyf[kr uksfVl ftlesa NaVuh ds dkj.kksa dk mYys[k gks] fn;k tkuk rFkk mDr vof/k ds volku ij NaVuh dk izHkkoh gksuk vFkok ,sot esa ,d ekg ds osru dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkos---------NaVuh ds le; lsok tks fd izR;sd ,d o"kZ dh vof/k3488 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] gsrq 15 fnu ;k 6 ekg ls vf/kd dh vof/k gsrq 15 fnu ds cjkcj NaVuh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkosaA lkFk gh leqfpr ljdkj vFkok izkf/kdkjh dks lwpuk dh rkfey djok;h tkosaA bl fu.kZ; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us uksfVl vFkok uksfVl osru rFkk ns; {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ds Hkqxrku dh 'krZ dks gh vkns'kkRed izd`fr dh 'krZ gksuk ekuk gSA /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ¼c½ ds vUrxZr lewfpr ljdkj@izkf/kdkjh dks uksfVl fn;s tkus dh 'krZ vkns'kkRed izko/kku ds :i esa ugha ekuh xbZ gSA ;gh fof/k izkFkhZ }kjk voyfEcr fu.kZ; LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku cuke m"kk yksdokuh o vU; ds fu.kZ; esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr dh xbZ gSA
21- bl izdj.k esa foi{kh }kjk izkFkhZ dks ,d ekg ds uksfVl ds LFkku ij ,d ekg ds osru jkf'k dk Hkqxrku fd;k x;k gS blls ;g Li"V gS fd pwafd uksfVl fn;k gh ugha x;k gS blfy;s uksfVl esa lsok lekfIr ds dkj.kksa dk mYys[k fd;k tkuk laHko u gksus ls visf{kr Hkh ugha gSA bl izdkj foi{khx.k }kjk izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd djrs le; vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 ¼,Q½ ds vkns'kkRed izko/kkuksa dh lE;~d vuqikyuk dj fy;s tkus ls izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr oS/k NaVuh ds :i esa fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gksrk gSA vr% ;g fcUnq izkFkhZ ds fo:) ,oa foi{khx.k ds i{k esa fuf.kZr fd;k tkrk gSA
fcUnq la- ¼2½ bl fcUnq ds vUrxZr ;g n`"VO; gS fd D;k izkFkhZ dks lsoki`Fkd djrs le; izkFkhZ ls dfu"Brj Jfed dks lsoki`Fkd ugha fd;k x;k vFkkZr izkFkhZ ds oxZ esa fu;ksftr fd;s tkus okys vfUre O;fDr dh NaVuh ugha dh xbZ\ bl lUnHkZ esa izkFkhZ us vius nkos esa ;g dgk gS fd izkFkhZ dks lsoki`Fkd djrs le; izkFkhZ ls dfu"B dk;Zjr Jfed dks lsoki`Fkd ugha fd;k x;kA mYys[kfu; gS fd izkFkhZ us vius nkos ds vfHkdFku esa mlls dfu"B dk;Zjr Jfed dk uke of.kZr ugha fd;k gS] oju ;g dgk gS fd mlds LFkku ij vc eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;k.k ls dke fy;k tk jgk gSA mDr eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;k.k dk dk;Zjr gksuk foi{khx.k us Hkh Lohdkj fd;k gSA fdUrq mDr Jfedksa ds foi{kh ds v/khu dk;Zjr gksus ij Hkh ;g mi/kkfjr ugha fd;k tk ldrk gS fd ;s nksuksa Jfed izkFkhZ ls dfu"Brj gksA foi{kh ds lk{kh us ;g dgk gS fd eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;k.k vVs.MsV de loZj ds in ij fu;ksftr Fks rFkk izkFkhZ ds v/khu dk;Z djrs FksA ftUgksusa izkFkhZ ls ftjksDl e'khu pykus dk dke lh[k fy;k FkkA bl izdkj ;g Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr ftjksDl e'khu vkWijsVj ds in ij dh xbZ Fkh tcfd eksgj flag o lR;ukjk;k.k uked Jfed ftjksDl e'khu vkWijsVj ds laoxZ ls fHkUu in vVs.MsV de loZj ds in ij FksA bl izdkj izkFkhZ vkSj mDr nksuksa Jfed lqfHkUu inksa ij dk;Zjr FksA buds izkFkhZ ls dfUk"B gksus dk rdZ ;|fi izkFkhZ us izekf.kr ugha fd;k gS fQj Hkh fHkUu laoxZ ds gksus ls bu nksuksa Jfedksa dks izkFkhZ ls iwoZ lsokeqfDr u fd;k tkuk /kkjk 25 ¼th½ ds izko/kkuksa dh vogsyuk ugha dgk tk ldrkA bl foospu ds mijkUr ;g fcUnq Hkh izkFkhZ ds fo:) ,oa foi{khx.k ds i{k esa fuf.kZr fd;k tkrk gSA
fcUnq la[;k ¼3½ vuqrks"k %& fopkjf.k; fcUnq ,d o nks izkFkhZ ds fo:) fuf.kZr fd;s x;s gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa 19-09-2003 dks izkFkhZ dh lsokeqfDr foi{khx.k }kjk oS/k NaVuh ds :i esa fd;k tkuk izekf.kr gksrk gS blfy;s foi{kh izcU/ku }kjk dh xbZ NaVuh dh dk;Zokgh esa fdlh izdkj dk gLr{ksi visf{kr ugha gS vkSj izkFkhZ fdlh vuqrks"k dk vf/kdkjh izekf.kr ugha gqvk gSA
vkns'k
22- izkFkhZ }kjk nkos dk vfHkdFku vLohdkj dj foi{kh izcU/ku }kjk 19-09-2003 dks izkFkhZ ds ftjksDl vkWijsVj ds in ls dh xbZ lsokeqfDr oS/k ,oa U;k;ksfpr ikbZ tkrh gSA izkFkhZ fdlh vuqrks"k dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA
23- iapkV rn~uqlkj ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA Je eU=ky; }kjk bl ekeys esa U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fjQjsUl dk mRrj mi;qZDrkuqlkj fn;k tkrk gSA
24- iapkV dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vUrXkZr izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosA
jk/kk eksgu prqoZsnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-806.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ MCyw-lh-,y- ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&a Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 59@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&22012@120@2013&vkbZ vkj (lh-,e&II)] jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3489
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.806.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 59/2013) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Nagpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the the management of M/s W.C.L. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 07.05-2019.
[No. L-22012/120/2013–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOURT COURT, NAGPUR
Case No. CGIT/NGP/59/2013-14 Date: 26.03.2019
Party No. 1(a) : The Director (Personnel), Western Coalfields Limited, Coal Estate, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440001.
Party No. 1 (b) : The General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur Area, Jaripatka, Nagpur – 440001. Party No. 1(c) : The Area General Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Unred Project, Nagpur.
Versus
Party No. 2 : Shri Prabhakar Shriram Junghare, Koyala shraamik Sabha (HMS), R/o Tilak Chowk, Itwari, Kumbhapuria, Umred, Distt. Nagpur.
AWARD
(Dated : 26th March, 2019)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Koyala Shramik Sabha (HMS) for adjudication, as per letter No. L-22012/120/2013-IR (CM-II) dated 18.09.2013, with the following Schedule:-
"Whether the action of the management of Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur area and Umrer area in not offering the re-employment to Shri Nathu Bajirao Mandhare & 15 others as mentioned in the list annexed, before appointing fresh hands, is just fair or legal? If not, to what relief, is entitled to the concerned workmen to?"
2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, Koyla Shramik Sabha (HMS) ('Party No. 2" in short), filed the statement of claim and the management of Western Coalfields Limited ("Party No. 1" in short) filed their written statement.
3. The Party No. 2 filed statement of claim by asserting that, they were working with the Party No. 1 and they are the members of the Party No. 2. According to the union, on 31.05.1991, the service of 16 members of Party No. 2 was illegally terminated by Party No. They filed a case before the RLC(C) for the direction to the Party No. 1 for reinstatement in services. According to the Party No. 2, a settlement taken place between the Party No. 2 and 1 before the RLC(C), in which, Party No. 1 assured the Party No. 2 to provide employment to the above workers. According to3490 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] the Party No. 2, Party No. 1 was not taking any action regarding above settlement. So, they filed Writ Petition 1590/1995 before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, Bench at Nagpur.
4. According to the Party No. 2, above workers were employee of Party No. 1 in regular nature and such type of work was available all time with the Party No. 1. The Hon'ble High Court directed in Writ Petition to employ the above workers in giving preference of re-employment as and when vacancies are available, but Party No. 1 was not providing employment in the view of the settlement and they disobeyed the order of the Hon'ble High Court. According to the Party No. 2, they are entitled for re-employment U/s 25-H of the above act.
5. According to the Party No. 2, Party No. 1 had appointed 22 casual labours in the year of 1993-94 in Saoner/Umrer Area to the post of General Mazdoor. They also asserted that, Party No. 1 also appointed General Mazdoor in the year of 2007, 2008 and 2009. So they prayed that, Party No. may be directed to appoint the above workers in re-employment in the view of order passed by the Hon'ble High Court, Bench at Nagpur in above Writ Petition. They also prayed for further relief in the light and circumstances of the above case.
6. The Party No. 1 filed its written statement by asserting that, present workers were not in employment, hence they cannot become the member of the Party No. 2. So, this reference is not maintainable in the representative capacity. They also asserted that, settlement was taken place on 03.01.1992 and present reference has been made after a period of more than 20 years. So, present reference should not be entertained and same should be dismissed as a stale claim. Party No. 1 also asserted that, said settlement is not genuine in the eye of law and there is no merit of the case. They also asserted that, Party No. 1 has nowhere assured the Party No. 2 that, above workers shall be employed or given any kind of preference.
7. According to the Party No. 1, there was no obligation to provide any employment to the above workers, because person asked to compete with the person interested in taking employment with Party No. 1 against the clear vacancy after observing due formality. They also denied that, the Party No. 1 had given reply on 29.03.1993. According to them, there is no vacancy in open category and no appointment was made in open category. Provision of 25-H of the above Act are not applicable to the present workers. They also asserted that, Party No. 2 has floated the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court. It is also denied that, present workers were performing a regular nature of work. It is also denied that, they had been illegally terminated.
8. According to the Party No. 1, its members are interested in seeking employment in backdoor entry, so according to the Party No. 1 question of giving any preference does not arise, when the person is not entitled for the same. According to them, there had not been a single vacancy against the open category of General Mazdoor till date and hence, question of proving employment on whose behalf, reference has been made, does not arise. So, they prayed that, present dispute as such raised by the Party No. 2 is devoid of any substance and same is liable to be answered in negative against the Party No. 2.
9. Point of determination:
i. Whether the present workers are entitled for re-employment?
ii. Whether the act of the Party No. 1 not offering the employment is just, fair and legal?
iii. Whether the above workers are entitled for any other relief?
Reason of determination:
10. Now I want to see the legal position, because both the parties did not file any case law. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs Nemichand, Civil Appeal No. 5861 of 2007, SC dated 01.03.2011, Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs Hotilal, Civil Appeal No. 5984 of 2000 dated 11.02.2003, State Bank of India Vs Ramesh Dinkar, Civil Appeal No. 2055 of 2003 dated 11.08.2006, Devendra Kumar Vs State of Uttaranchal, Civil Appeal No. 1155 of 2006 dated 29.07.2013 and Bharat Forge Company Ltd. Vs A.B. Zodge, A.I.R. 1996 SC 1556, in which following legal principles are laid down:-
i. It is now well settled that the courts will not act as an appellate court and reassess the evidence led in the domestic enquiry, nor interfere on the ground that another view is possible on the material on record.
ii. Therefore, courts will not interfere with findings of fact recorded in departmental enquires, except where such findings are based on no evidence or where they are clearly perverse. The test to find out perversity is to see whether a Tribunal acting reasonably could have arrived at such conclusion or finding, on the material on record. Courts will however interfere with the findings in disciplinary matters, if principles of natural justice or statutory regulations have been violated or if the order is found to be arbitrary, capricious, malafide or based on extraneous considerations.
iii. The position in our country, in administrative law, where no fundamental freedoms as aforesaid are involved, is that the courts/tribunals will only play a secondary role while the primary judgment as to reasonableness will remain with the executive or administrative authority.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 349111. In case law--- Delhi Transport Corp. vs. Ombir Singh 2017 LLR 252, Hon'ble Lordship held that "Where principles of natural justice are not being complied with, then in such cases, compensation ought to be granted even if termination of service is found to be valid". On the basis of principle laid down in Engineering Laghu Udhyog Employees Union vs Judge, Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal & others – (2003) 12 SCC 1 in which it was held that:- "no difference whether the matter comes before the tribunal for approval under S.33 or on a reference under S.10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. In either case if the enquiry is defective or if no enquiry has been held as required by Standing Orders, the entire case would be open before the tribunal and the employer would have to justify on facts as well that its order of dismissal or discharge was proper." "A defective enquiry in our opinion stands on the same footing as no enquiry and in either case the tribunal would have jurisdiction to go into the facts and the employer would have to satisfy the tribunal that on facts the order of dismissal or discharge was proper." These principles are also laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case laws- Punjab Urban Planning & Development authority Vs. Mandip Singh (2016) 7 SCC-571, UPSRTC Vs. Gopal Shukla (2015) SCC 603, Sanjay Singh Vs. National Seed Corporation (2017) 13 SCC 269, V.D. Vegad Vs. State of Gujurat (2017) 2 SCC 508 and Angikr Oriental (Arbic) Higher Secondary School Vs. A. Harnoon (2017) 2 SCC 510.
12. On behalf of the workman, it was argued that, Party No. 1 has not come with clean hand, because Party No. 1 had made appointment of some workers after passing the order of Hon'ble High Court. He also argued that, services of 16 workers were terminated illegally. After that, Party No. 1 could not consider for their re-employment. This fact was denied by the Party No.1 in his written notes of argument. On behalf of the Party No. 2, Shri Prabhakar was examined as PW-1. In his further chief, he wanted to prove fact of the case as well as document Nos. W-II and W-III, but in his cross-examination, he admitted that, above workmen are not working in WCL. He also admitted that, at the time of settlement i.e. 1992, WCL Umrer Area was not in existence.
13. Shri Prabhakar, PW-1 also admitted in para no. 14 of his cross-examination that, "No document has been filed to show that, workman had made an application for appointment on the basis of settlement, Exhibit W-II". According to him, he also admitted that, "Neither in the statement of claim, nor in the rejoinder, nor in am affidavit, it has been mentioned that, there was vacancy of the posts as claimed by the workmen and the workmen had applied for their appointment to the said posts, but management did not give them appointment". He also asserted that, he had filed affidavit on behalf of the all workmen, but he did not filed any authority letter on behalf of the union. According to him, he asserted in his evidence on affidavit that, all workmen were working with Party No. 1. He also admitted that, he did not file any document regarding the membership of the workmen. That gave weight to the argument of the Party No. 1 that, he did not represent on behalf of all workers. Now I want to discuss argument of the Party No. 1.
14. On behalf of the Party No. 1, it was argued that, all above 16 workers named in statement of claim are not the member of the union, because their services were terminated on 31.05.1991. They also argued that, this reference is delayed near about 26 years. They also argued that, there was no alleged settlement on 03.01.1992. They also argued that, they only claimed employment against future vacancies after due formalities. On perusal of the records, it appears that, alleged settlement, Exhibit W-II, Party No. 1 asserted that, there is no merit to this case. The Hon'ble High Court also directed in his order dated 24.11.2004 to the Party No. 1 that, "Respondent to consider the cases of the member/employees of the petitioner-Union for re-appointment as and when the vacancies would arise with them as per the Standing Orders and Section 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947".
15. Judging the present case in hand with the touch stone of the principles as mentioned above, as I observed that, Party No. 2 failed to prove that, Party No. 1 illegally terminated or retrenched above said workers. Settlement between the parties is not binding nature on the Party No. 1. So, it is not enforceable through this Tribunal. The Hon'ble High Court's order and its direction are on record. So, no need of issue of fresh direction on same line, but record show that, above 16 workers was working with the Party No. 1. In my opinion, they worked for more than year. Wage prevailing at that time is available at Net. On this basis, compensation is ascertained. So, they are entitled for compensation of Rs. 20,000/- each. In case of disability or death of any workman, their L.Rs is entitled for the compensation from the Party No. 1. Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the management of Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur area and Umrer area in not offering the re-employment to Shri Nathu Bajirao Mandhare & 15 others as mentioned in the list annexed, before appointing fresh hands, is just, fair or legal, but , each workman is entitled for Lumpsum monetary compensation of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) in lieu of reinstatement in service, which is payable within one month from the publication of this award in official gazette, failing which, amount due to workman will carry interest of 6% per annum from the date of due to the workman to the date of actual payment of the amount to the workman. The workman is not entitled for any other relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer3492 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-807.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&a Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 82@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&22011@56@2014&vkbZ vkj (lh-,e&II)] jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.807.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 82/2014) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jaipur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the the management of M/s F.C.I and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 07.05-2019.
[No. L-22011/56/2014–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
vuqca/k
dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj
lh-th-vkbZ-Vh- izdj.k la- 82/2014
jsQjsUl ua--L- 22011/56/2014–IR (C.M.-II) fnukad 07.11.2014
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
fiUVw iq= Jh jes'k] fuoklh& HkSlkuk+] rglhy jktk[ksM+k] ftyk /kksyiqj jktLFkku & izkFkhZx.k
cuke
1- tujy eSustj ¼jhtu½ ,Q-lh-vkbZ- fjtuy vkWfQl&4] usg: iSysl] Vksad jksM+] t;iqjA
2- fjtuy eSustj] QwM dkWjiksjs'ku vkWQ bf.M;k IykV ua- 12] Ldhe ua- 5] eaxy fogkj] vyojA & vizkFkhZx.k
mifLFkr
izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ ugha
vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh lqjsUnz flag& vf/koDrk
vf/kfu.kZ;
fnukad % 09- 04- 2019
1- Je ea=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj] ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 7-11-2014 dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 ¼ftls vkxkeh pj.kksa esa vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼?k½ ds vUrXkZr fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn bl vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZu gsrq izsf"kr fd;k %
**D;k {ks=h; izca/kd] Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe vyoj ,oa deZdkj Jh fiUVw iq= Jh jes'k] etnwj dks ekSf[kd vkns'k fnukad 01-03-2012 ds }kjk ukSdjh ls fudkyk tkuk U;k;ksfpr ,oa U;k;laxr gS\ ;fn ugha rks deZdkj fdl vuqrks"k dks ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS\**
2- mDr fookn ds bl vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgwr fd;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ ls vis{kk dh xbZ fd og vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djsaA fnukad 2-2-2015 dks izkFkhZ }kjk nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds vfHkdFku ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ dh fu;qfDr foi{kh laLFkku esa 2008 esa gqbZ FkhA og lu 2011 rd fu;kstu esa jgk vkSj vkxs Hkh dke djrk jgkA foi{kh us 1 ekpZ 2012 dks ekSf[kd :i ls izkFkhZ dks lsok ls i`Fkd dj fn;kA foi{kh us lgk;d Jfedksa dks fu;fer djus gsrq ,d lwph cukbZ ftlesa 56 Jfed lfEefyr Fks] fdUrq izkFkhZ dk uke lfEefyr ugha fd;k x;kA ,d Jfed j.kohj iq= Hkxoku nkl FkkA ftlus 103 fnol dk;Z fd;k Fkk mls fu;fer dj fn;k tcfd izkFkhZ dks 127 fnu dk;Z djus ij Hkh fu;fer ugha fd;kA izkFkhZ us vius vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls 15-3-13 dks uksfVl Hkh fn;k ysfdu dksbZ ykHk ugha gqvkA foi{kh us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 25 th ,oa fu;e 77 o 78 dk mYya?ku fd;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks leLr lsok ykHkksa lfgr lsok esa cgky fd;k tkosA[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3493 3- foi{khx.k us oknksRrj esa ;g dgk gS fd Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk ds vuqlj.k esa ¼dke ugha rks osru ugha½ ds vk/kkj ij Bsdk izFkk ds Jfedksa ls dk;Z djokuk cUn dj fn;k x;k blls iwoZ 3 o"kZ dh vo/kh ¼19-5-2008 ls 20-5-2011 rd½ esa vf/kdre vof/k rd Bsdk Jfed ds :i eas dk;Z dj pqds Jfedksa dks ojh;rk lwph cukdj Lohd`r Jfed {kerk ds vk/kkj ij dk;Z djok;k tk jgk gSA ftl Jfed us 136 fnu dk;Z fd;k gS mldk vfUre p;u gqvk gS tcfd izkFkhZ us 127 fnu gh dk;Z fd;k gS izkFkhZ dks foi{kh laLFkku us dHkh fu;qDr ugha fd;k cfYd 20-5-11 rd yksfMax&vuyksfMax dk dk;Z dks Bsdsnkj }kjk Bsds ij fu;ksftr Jfedksa ls djok;k tk tgk gSA izkFkhZ }kjk Bsdk izFkk ds vUrxZr vkdfLed Jfed ds :i esa dk;Z fd;k x;k gSA Jfed j.kohj dk p;u 150 dk;Z fnol gksus ds vk/kkj ij fd;k x;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ ds nkos dks vLohdkj fd;k tkosA
4- foi{kh dk oknksRrj izLrqr gksus ds mijkUr fnukad 21-9-2017 ls fnukad 9-4-19 rd 8 volj vkSj yxHkx Ms<+ o"kZ dh vof/k izkFkhZ dks lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq nh xbZ fdUrq izkFkhZ us vius nkos ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dhA ;gka rd fd foxr 8-11-17 ls izkFkhZ i{k fcuk fdlh lwpuk o dkj.k ds vuqifLFkr pyk vk jgk gSA ;g fLFkfr ;g n'kkZus dks i;kZIr gS fd izkFkhZ LosPN;k vius nkos ds leFkZu esa dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha djuk pkgrk gS blfy;s lk{; izkFkhZ lekIr dj nh xbZA
5- foi{kh us Hkh bl fLFkfr esa dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha djuk pkgkA
6- izdj.k dh bl voLFkk esa ;g Li"V gS fd izkFkhZ dh lk{; ds vHkko eas Je eU=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk izsf"kr bl vkS|ksfxd fookn dk U;k;fu.kZ;u bl vf/kdj.k }kjk fd;k tkuk lEHko ugha gSA ;g fLFkfr ;g Hkh n'kkZrh gS fd mHk;i{k ds e/; dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha jgk gSA
7- vr% bl vf/kdj.k dks izsf"kr fookn lk{; ds vHkko esa U;k;fu.kZ;u fd;k tkuk lEHko u gksus@dksbZ fookn 'ks"k ugha jgus ds dkj.k rnuqlkj mRrfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
8- Je eU=ky; }kjk bl ekeys esa U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fjQjsUl dk mRrj mi;qZDrkuqlkj fn;k tkrk gSA
9- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vUrXkZr izdk"kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosA
jk/kk eksgu prqoZsnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
ubZ fnYyh] 8 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-808.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ,u-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k≶&aJe U;k;ky;] y[kuÅ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 98@2004) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 07-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&22012@362@2003&vkbZ vkj (lh-,e& II)]
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 8th May, 2019
S.O.808.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 98/2004) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Lucknow now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. N.C.L. and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 07.05-2019.
[No. L-22012/362/2003–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL –CUM- LABOUR COURT LUCKNOW
PRESENT : RAKESH KUMAR, PRESIDING OFFICER
I.D. No. 98/2004
Ref. No. L-22012/362/2003 - IR ( CM-II) dated: 04.10.2004
3494 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]BETWEEN
Shri Karukarmal, S/o Sh. Ram Lal Karmali Village – Parsauni Neelimi Tola Post – Pasauni, Dist. Sitamadhi Uttar Pradesh – 843 325
AND
The General Manager Northern Coalfields Ltd. Khadia Project, Khadia Dist. Sonebhadra Sonebhadra (U.P.)
ORDER
1. By order No. L-22012/362/2003 - IR ( CM-II) dated: 04.10.2004 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi in exercise of powers conferred by clause (d) of sub section (1) and sub section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) referred this industrial dispute between the Shri Karukarmal, S/o Sh. Ram Lal Karmali, Village – Parsauni Neelimi Tola, Post – Pasauni, Dist. Sitamadhi , Uttar Pradesh and the General Manager, Northern Coalfields Ltd., Khadia Project, Khadia, Dist. Sonebhadra for adjudication.
2. The reference under adjudication is:
"WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NORTHERN COALFIELDS LIMITED
THROUGH ITS KHADIA PROJECT IN TERMINATING THE SERVICES OF SH. KARU KARMALI AS
PER ORDER DATE 28.3.2002 IS LEGAL AND JUSTIFIED? IF NOT, TO WHAT RELIEF HE IS
ENTITLED?"
3. The case of the workman, Karu Karmali, in brief, is that he had been appointed by the opposite party on 21.08.80 on the post of Labour Category-II for working as wagon loader at the "railway siding" on compensatory ground in the place of his uncle, late Chotan Karmali, on being his uncle medically unfit, as he (uncle) did not have any son. It is also the case of the workman that he had been adopted by Sri Ramlal, elder brother of Sri Chotan Karmali and they lived in a joint family. The workman has stated that at the time of his appointment his uncle and aunt had given their consent, which was accepted by the opposite party no. 1 and accordingly, the appointment letter was issued mentioning the workman as nephew of Sri Chotan Karmali. The workman has submitted that he worked continuously for 13 years, without any flaw and his services had been of excellent in nature; and also that he did not conceal any fact for getting his appointment. The workman has alleged that the management, issued a charge sheet dated 9/22-07-1993, which was adequately replied by the workman and the management being unsatisfied with the reply, constituted a domestic inquiry; and the inquiry officer concluded the same in utter violation of the principles of the natural justice and found the charges proved; resultantly, the services of the workman had been terminated vide order dated 28.03.2002 by the management. The workman has prayed that the illegal order dated 28.03.2002 be quashed and he should be reinstated with consequential benefits.
3. The management of the Northern Coal Fields has disputed the claim of the workman, though had not filed any parawise reply to the statement of claim, field by the workman, with submission that the workman had been issued a charge dated 9/22-07-1993 for alleged misconduct of obtaining employment fraudulently on forged grounds and after providing reasonable opportunity to defend himself, was awarded punishment of dismissal from service vide order dated 28.03.2002, on having proved the charges against him. Accordingly, the management has prayed that the claim of the workman is devoid of any merit and is liable to be rejected.
4. The workman field rejoinder, reiterating his contentions, already made in the statement of claim.
5. The parties filed documents in support of their respective case and adduced oral evidence. The workman examined himself; whereas the management failed to examine any witness in support of their case. The management cross-examined the workman witness. Both the parties forwarded oral arguments in support of their contentions.
6. Gone through written submissions file by the parties and perused entire evidence on record.
7. Following preliminary issues were framed on the request of the parties vide order dated 03.09.2009:
(i) Kya vibhagiya janch nyay ke naisergik sidhant ki andekhi karte hue ki gai hai?
(ii) Kya janch adhikaari ki akhya duragrahpurn hai?
After framing of preliminary issues the workman was called upon to adduce its evidence. The parties adduced evidence in support of the preliminary issues, and submitted their intellect submissions as well before the then Hon'ble Judge/Presiding Officer.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 34958. The preliminary issues, framed vide order dated 03.09.2009, had been decided by my learned predecessor with following observations:
"16. Accordingly, I come to the conclusion that the domestic enquiry conducted by the management
of the Northern Coalfield Ltd. was in violation of principles of natural justice and the same is liable
to be set aside."
Thus, after, vitiation of the inquiry, the opposite party was afforded an opportunity to prove the charges before this Tribunal in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in 1999 SCC (L&S) 302 Neeta Kaplish Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court & another.
9. The management filed affidavit of Sri S.K. Mishra, Sr. Officer (Pers), Sri S.N. Choubey, Personnel Manager, Sri Uma Shankar Yadav, Sri Surendera Karmali, Sri Dhuneshwar Saav, Sri Vinayak Shankar and examined Sri Tapan Kumar Sarkar in support of its case. On the contrary the workman relied upon the evidence he had already led in support of preliminary issues.
10. The witnesses were cross-examined and parties submitted written submissions in support of their respective claim.
11. Perused the file and scanned entire evidence available on record from either parties.
12. The workman has come up with a case that he had been appointed with the opposite parties w.e.f. 21.08.1980 on compassionate grounds, in place of his uncle Sri Chotan Karmali who was declared medically unfit. It is also the case of the workman that he had been brought up by the elder brother of Sri Chotan Kamali, Sri Ram Lal Karmali, as his adopted son, ever since his childhood. The workman has alleged that the opposite party management had made a thorough inquiry for many months regarding all facts and thereafter he was issued appointment letter by the respondent establishment. The workman has stated that all required documents, regarding his being nephew of Sri Chotan Karmali, was provided by Sri Chotan Karmali to the management at the time of appointment and he has specifically submitted that while issuing the appointment letter the management made a narrative of all the facts in the said appointment letter. It is submitted by the workman that he worked with the opposite parties with full devotion for 23 years without any break and has argued that the management has terminated his services in consequence to the domestic inquiry based on the illegal charge sheet dated 22.7.1993. The workman has submitted that he did not ever misrepresent before the management while getting appointment, therefore, the action of the management is illegal and he is liable to be reinstated.
13. Per contra, the management has submitted that the workman obtained employment as General Mazdoor from the management w.e.f. 21.08.1980 fraudulently on the basis of distorted facts and concealment of material information in place of his so-called uncle Sri Chhottan Karmali; Sri Karu Karmali had presented himself as adopted son of Mr. Ram Lal Karmali, brother of Sri Chotan Karmali and had obtained employment in place of Sri Chotan Karmali who was shown ill and had left the employment due to bad health. The management has stated that after revealing the fact that the workman was not nephew of Sri Chotan Karmali, as he was a Muslim by birth and he cannot be adopted by a Hindu i.e. Sri Ram Lal Karmali, a formal domestic inquiry had been set up and on finding the charges to be proved, the workman had been removed from service.
14. It is admitted case of the parties that the workman, Karu Karmali was appointed on 21.08.1980 in Labour Category II and he was suspended after serving charge sheet dated 09/22-07-1998 for alleged misconduct of getting appointment by deposing false facts. The services of the workman had been terminated vide order dated 28.03.2002 after conducting a departmental inquiry.
15. In Municipal Employees' Union & another vs. Secretary (Labour), Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & another 2001 (89) FLR 360 Hon'ble Delhi High Court taking terms of reference into consideration has observed that the Industrial Tribunal cannot travel beyond the terms of reference. Terms of reference should invariably encompass the entire dispute between the workman and the management; also Hon'ble Bombay High Court in 2019 LLR 273 Ashok U. Nikam vs Tata Power Company Ltd. has held that in case of reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, the Labour Court is not empowered to travel beyond the terms of reference.
16. The terms of reference, referred to this Tribunal includes adjudication of termination of workman vide order dated 28.03.2002 which was outcome of the charge sheet dated 09.07.1993 and since the domestic inquiry held by the management had been vitiated vide this Tribunal's order dated06.08.2013 and the management of Northern Coalfield Limited had been afforded an opportunity to prove the charges leveled vide charge sheet dated 09.07.1993, before this Tribunal, therefore, this Tribunal has to confine itself within the circumference of contents of charge sheet dated 09.07.1993. The management of the Northern Coal Field Limited has come up with a case that the workman had been charge sheeted vide charge sheet dated 09.07.1993 for obtaining employment fraudulently, on the basis of false information. The sole charge leveled upon the workman reads as under:
"It has been reported that after giving false information, you have managed a job in this
company and you are continuing as personator since last 6.2.1980."
3496 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]The management examined number of witnesses in support the charge sheet. Sri Surendera Nath Chaube, who made preliminary inquiry in the case of the workman, stated in his cross-examination that "on making application, by the workman, his application had been examined by the department and he had been appointed on compassionate ground on opting VRS by Sri Chotan Karmali". The testimony of its one of the witness viz. Dhaneshwar Saav, is not reliable as he stated in cross-examination that Ram Lal Karmali had four brothers and he had no brother viz. Chotan Karmali. He also stated that he had never seen Karu Karmali and that he does not know any one named Chotan Karmali. Another management witness, Surendera Karmali, son of Late Ram Lal Karmali stated that it is wrong to say that any one obtained job in the name of Karu Karmali as fraud nephew of Chotan Karmali. He also stated that he has no knowledge of any formality being done by Sri Ram Lal Karmali to adopt Karu Karmali. Another management witness, Sri Uma Shankar Yadav, in his cross-examination stated that he is not aware of the fact that Karu Karmali obtained job in place of Chotan Karmali as adopted son of Ram Lal Karmali. Management witnesses viz. Sri Ishwar Baitha, Nand Lal Thakur and Shahabuddin, who were resident of village where the workman allegedly born and lived, identified workman as Kamruddin, they had no knowledge about adoption of Kamruddin by Ram Lal. Management's witnesses' evidence lack consistency and reliability.
17. The workman had denied the charge and has come with a case that his father Sri Ram Lal Karmali adopted him and he had been appointed on compassionate ground in the place of his uncle Sri Chotan Karmal, on being his medically unfit. It is also the case of the workman, that all these facts had been well in the knowledge of the management while issuing him appointment order dated 21.08.1980, paper No. C-13. The appointment order/office order dated 21.08.1980 reads as under:
"The following piece rated workers who have been taken in consequent upon voluntary retirement
of their parents will be deployed as Wagon Loader with effect from 21.8.80. They are directed to
report for duty to the Loading Inspector, Rly. Siding.
1. ……
2. …….
3. ……
4. Karu Karmali – Nephew Chhotan Karmali, Coalgattar.
5. …..
6. …..
7. …..
8. …..
9. …..
10. …..
-sd-
(P.K. Das)
Supdt. Of Mines/Project Officer
Saunda 'D' Colliery"
Likewise the page No. 13/2, which is the 'Service Details' of the workman, the workman has clearly mentioned name of Sri Ram Lal Karmali as his father. It is noteworthy to mention here that both the documents i.e. paper no. C-13 and 13/2 had been admitted before this Tribunal by the authorized representative of the management. Therefore, from perusal of the 'service details' in respect of the workman and appointment order dated 21.08.1980, which is on recrd, it very much clear that it was very well in the knowledge of the management, at the time of issuance, of the appointment order dated 21.08.1980, paper No. C-13 that the workman is nephew of Sri Chottan Karmali; hence the case of the management that the workman obtained appointment fraudulently by furnishing false information does not stand at all.
18. Further as regards workman by birth being Muslim and his illegal adoption by Sri Ram Lal Karmali, a Hindu, is not the part of charge sheet, therefore, it would not be prudent to travel beyond the scope of charge sheet, in order to decide the order of reference, which is in respect of validity of termination of the services of the workman vide order dated 28.03.2002, which was outcome of the charge sheet dated 09.07.1993. The management of the Northern Coalfield Ltd. in its written statement, paper No A2-10, never pleaded that the adoption of a Muslim boy by Hindu parent was not legal and it was a part of the charge sheet dated 09.07.1993. The contents of the charge sheet has to be judged on the basis of its ingredients and the consequential order, which is the sole object of the reference, has to be looked accordingly; and this Tribunal cannot go beyond the scope of reference. Legality of the said adoption is not to be adjudicated by this Tribunal while deciding the "schedule" referred by the Ministry. The management cannot substantiate its arguments beyond the pleadings filed/relied upon.
19. Accordingly, in view of the discussions made hereinabove, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order dated 28.03.2002, which was outcome of the charge sheet dated 09.07.1993, for providing alleged false information to obtain job, is neither legal nor justified; hence is liable to be set aside; and resultantly, the workman is entitled for reinstatement with consequential benefits such as continuity in service and full back wages; within eight[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3497 weeks from notification of the award, failing which the workman shall be entitled for simple interest @ 6% on the back wages.
20. Award as above.
LUCKNOW. 02nd April, 2019.
RAKESH KUMAR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 13 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-809.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eS- xzhu pSuy bUVj iksVZ lfoZll izkbZosV fyfeVsM ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@aJe U;k;ky; ua-&2] eqEcbZ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 2@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&39025@01@2019&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 13th May, 2019
S.O.809.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/2013) of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2 Mumbai now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the the management of M/s Green Channel Inter Port Services Private Limited and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 13.05-2019.
[No. L-39025/01/2019–IR (B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 2, MUMBAI
PRESENT : M. V. Deshpande, Presiding Officer
Appln. (Ref) No. CGIT-2/2 of 2013
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
M/S. GREEN CHANNEL INTER-PORT SERVICES PVT. LTD.
The Director, M/s. Green Channel Inter - Port Services Pvt. Ltd., 501 / 502, Vashi Plaza, D-Wing, 3rd Floor, Sec. – 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai – 400 075.
AND
THEIR WORKMEN
The General Secretary, Bharatiya Navik Sena Union, Br. Off: Poddar Chambers, 3rd Fl., S.A. Brelvi Road, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001.
3498 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]APPEARANCES:
FOR THE EMPLOYER : Mr. Mahesh Shukla, Advocate FOR THE WORKMEN : Mr. D. H. Patil, Advocate
Mumbai, dated the 29th March, 2019.
AWARD
1. This is a reference filed under Section 2-A sub section (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in view of the amendment in the Act No. 24 of 2010.
2. The second party workman has filed statement of claim Ex.2. According to the second party workman he was employed on permanent basis as Custom Dak Clerk with first party from Jan. '02 to 23.5.13. He has put up more than 240 days service in each year of his service. He was continuously working with the opponent without any break in service. However, the opponent issued him suspension letter on 4.1.13 without pay for 14 days from 1.4.13 which he replied vide letter dt. 10.4.13 denying all the contrary contents. He has not been paid his earned wages for the month of March '13 and wages for the suspension period of 14 days from 1.4.13 so also the wages from 15.4.13 to 22.5.13 as from 23.5.13 he has not been allowed to resume his duties. As such from 23.5.13 his services came to be illegally, orally and wrongfully terminated by the Directors of opponent company.
3. It is also the case of the concerned workman that at the time of his oral termination of services on 23.5.13 he was not issued any notice of termination nor paid payment in lieu of notice / retrenchment compensation or other legal dues. No seniority list was displayed on the notice board nor it was maintained. The principle last-cum-first-go was not followed. The mandatory provisions of section 25 F and 25 G of I.D. Act were violated. In his place fresh hand was employed without offering re-employment / sending letter calling him to report for duties and thereby section 25 H of the act has been violated. Thus mandatory provisions of 25 F, G & H of I.D. Act have been violated.
4. According to the concerned workman he served his demand letter dt. 10.6.13 on the opponent under RPAD. He filed his justification statement dt. 10.7.13 at the office of Dy.CLC at Sion, Mumbai for kind intervention. During the conciliation proceedings the opponent appeared but was not cooperative. Conciliation proceedings ended in failure and conciliation officer sent certificate dt. 4.10.13 to the union to approach CGIT-cum-Labour Court for adjudication of the said dispute. Hence he has filed this reference.
5. The concerned workman is therefore asking to direct the opponent to pay to him his earned wages for the month of March '13, wages for illegal suspension of 14 days from 1.4.13 and wages from 15.4.13 to 22.5.13 and to declare that his oral termination on and from 23.5.13 is illegal, improper and bad in law. He is also asking for reinstatement at his original post with full back wages, continuity of service and other consequential benefits w.e.f. 23.5.13 till reinstatement.
6. Opponent resisted the claim by filing written statement Ex.11 contending therein that the services of the concerned workman has not been terminated from 23.5.13 and that he himself is not reporting to duty from 15.4.13 as he has indulged in serious misconduct in the company. It is contention of the opponent that services of the concerned workman has been dismissed w.e.f. 24.8.13 and that detailed charge sheet has been served upon him which has been admitted.
7. According to the Opponent, the concerned workman was appointed as Custom Dak Clerk but actually he was senior most amongst all other junior clerks and therefore he was allotting the other clerks work as required by company. His responsibilities were of high importance as such supervisory Sr. Executive staff coordinating with Head of Dept. and allotting work to Jr. Custom Clerks. Though he was designated as Custom Clerk, his nature of work was not of workman.
8. It is also a case of the Opponent / first pary that the concerned workman had no clear unblemished record. He was warned at several occasions. He has been indulging in very serious misconduct of abusing his senior in filthy language and physical assault. Therefore it was decided by the management to prove the charges of misconduct in the court as per settled principle of law. On these premise the opponent has sought dismissal of reference.
9. Following issues are framed at Ex.12. I reproduce the Issues along with my findings thereon for the reasons to follow:
| Sr. No. | Issue | Findings |
| 1 | Whether the first party management has terminated the services of the workman on 23.5.13 or whether workman willfully remained absent ? | First party management has terminated the services of the workman on 23.5.13. |
| 2. | Whether the services of the workman was terminated legally ? | No |
| 3. | Whether the workman is entitled to the wages for the period of his suspension ? | Yes |
| 4. | Whether the workman is entitled to be reinstated in the service with full back- wages? | Yes |
| 5. | What relief the workman is entitled to ? | As per final order |
Reasons
Issue No. 1
10. At the outset, it may be stated that the first party opponent have not adduced any evidence even though in their written statement, it has been contended by them that they have reserved their right to prove the charges of misconduct against the concerned workman in respect of allegations as regards the abuses to the senior colleague late Anil Khatre and other allegations of misconduct. The wife of concerned workman has filed his affidavit in support of his claim. Opponent remained absent and therefore evidence of wife of concerned workman has gone unchallenged. In the circumstances it is to be seen whether the concerned workman willfully remained absent or whether the first party has terminated the services of the workman on 23.5.13.
11. From the evidence of the wife of the concerned workman it is clear that the concerned workman was employed on permanent basis as Custom / Dak Clerk with the opponent from Jan. '02. It is then clear from the evidence that the concerned workman had put up more than 240 days of service in each year of his service and that he has continuously worked with the opponent without any break. This sort of evidence of the wife of the concerned workman has gone unchallenged as there is no cross examination directed against her in the context.
12. The point therefore creeps in whether in the circumstances the termination of the concerned workman would amount to retrenchment within the expression as defined in section 2 (o) of I.D. Act. Obviously, the concerned workman was confirmed by the management of first party and he had worked for more than 240 days in each block of 12 months. As per section 2 (o) retrenchment means termination by the employer of the service of the workman for any reason whatsoever otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action but does not include;
(a) Voluntarily retirement of the workmen or
(b) Retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation and
(c) Termination of service of the workman on the ground of continuous ill-health.
13. From the above definition, it is clear that the termination of the concerned workman amounted to retrenchment since it is not by way of voluntary retirement or retirement on reaching the age of superannuation or as a result of non- renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the concerned workman.
14. Here in the instant case, it is contention of the first party that the services of the concerned workman has not been terminated but the concerned workman himself did not report to duty from 15.4.13 as he had indulged in serious misconduct in the company. In this respect even in the written statement the first party contended that they reserve their right to prove the charges of misconduct against the concerned workman. There is absolutely no evidence on behalf of the first party in respect of alleged misconduct of the concerned workman. As a matter of fact, it appears that the concerned workman was not given charge sheet in respect of alleged misconduct, no departmental enquiry was conducted and the charges have not been proved as alleged. In the circumstances it will have to be said that the contention of the first party to the effect that the applicant himself did not report to duty as he was indulged in serious misconduct in the company has not been proved and that contention cannot be accepted.
15. In the written statement the first party has admitted that applicant was appointed as Custom Clerk. Even it is admitted that he was suspended vide letter dt. 1.4.13 and that the said suspension was initially for 14 days. It is contended in the written statement that the suspension was on account of serious instant on 18.3.13 and 19.3.13 and that time the concerned workman abused his senior colleague and further slapped and abused his senior colleague on 19.3.13. But nothing of this sort has been proved by the first party since there is no evidence adduced by the first party in the context. It will have to be said therefore that the suspension of the concerned workman initially for 14 days that to without pay was illegal.
16. It is contended by the first party in the written statement that the concerned workman abandoned his services and that he remained absent without any reason. In this respect if we see the evidence of wife of concerned workman, she stated that her husband replied the letter issued by the opponent but then the opponent company did not allow him to resume duty on 15.4.13. This sort of evidence has also gone unchallenged. It will have to be said therefore that inspite of efforts made by the concerned workman he was not allowed to resume duty which amounted to oral termination of the concerned workman.
3500 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]17. We have documents on record to show that General Secretary of the union wrote letters to the first party on 10.4.13 as regards the illegal suspension of the concerned workman. He also wrote letter on 20.5.13 to the Director of the first party mentioning therein that the concerned workman reported his duty on 15.4.13 and he was not allowed to resume duties. Even though the first party in their reply denied the contents of the letter given by the General Secretary of the union. The fact remains that the wife of the concerned workman has stated on oath that her husband was not allowed to resume the duty and this sort of evidence of wife of the concerned workman has gone unchallenged.
18. Considering these documents on record and particularly, the evidence of the wife of the concerned workman, it will have to be said that services of the concerned workman have been terminated w.e.f. 23.5.13. As such the first party has not adduced evidence nor proved by cogent evidence that the concerned workman willfully remained absent. In view of this issue No.1 is answered accordingly as indicated against it.
Issue No.2.
19. From the evidence of wife of the concerned workman, it is clear that the first party has not issued any notice of termination nor paid compensation or legal dues. According to her, in his place fresh hand was employed without offering re-employment to the concerned workman that too violating the principle first come first go and even the seniority list was not published. In view of that it can be said that pre-requisite for valid retrenchment as laid down in section 25 F has not been complied with.
20. In the decision in case of State of Bombay V/S. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha – 1960 – I – LLJ – 251, it is held that failure to comply with the requirement of Section 25 F of I.D. Act which prescribes the condition precedent for valid retrenchment renders the order of retrenchment invalid and inoperative. In other words, it does not bring about cessation of service of the workman and the workman continues to be in service.
21. From the evidence of wife of the concerned workman, it is clear that the concerned workman has been in continuous service. He had worked for more than 240 days in each block of 12 month. If that is so, it can be said that he has satisfied the liability criteria enacted in section 25 F of I.D. Act for claiming retrenchment compensation. His case is not covered by any of the expected or excluded categories. He has rendered service continuously since from Jan. '02 to 15.4.13. Therefore termination of service would constitute retrenchment and in that circumstances non-compliance of section 25 F of I.D. Act will make his retrenchment ab-initio void since compliance of section 25 F of I.D. Act is mandatory.
22. Even it is explicit that the first party did not offer notice pay in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation. When admittedly notice pay was not offered to concerned workman, it is clear that the conditions stipulated under section 25 F (a) of I.D. Act has not been complied. It is in that circumstances it can be said that there is breach of mandatory provisions of sub section (a) (b) & (c) of section 25 F of the act.
23. From the evidence of wife of the concerned workman, it is clear that her husband tried to obtain gainful employment but he could not get it and remained unemployed. On 5.12.16 he got paralytic attack and was admitted in the hospital for several days. He is not in a position to talk and can only walk by taking support. This sort of evidence has also gone unchallenged.
24. From the evidence, it can be observed that there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of sub section (a) (b) & (c) of section 25 F of the act. No departmental enquiry was held in respect of alleged misconduct even if the management reserved right to prove the misconduct of concerned workman by adducing evidence before the court. The management has not adduce any evidence but on the contrary remained absent. In view of that the oral termination of the concerned workman amounted to retrenchment and the said termination of his service is illegal. Issue No. 2 is therefore answered accordingly as indicated against it.
Issue No. 3, 4 & 5.
25. In view of my findings to issue No.1 & 2, the concerned workman is entitled to be reinstated in the service with full back wages and continuity of service and other consequential benefits w.e.f. 23.5.13 till reinstatement. He is also entitled to earned wages for the month of March '13 for the period of 14 days since he has been illegally suspended without pay. He is also entitled to wages from 15.4.13 to 22.5.13 since he has not been allowed to resume duties during this period. So far entitlement of the concerned workman to the cost of reference is concerned, there is no order as to costs. Hence I answer the above issues accordingly as indicated each of them in terms of above observations.
26. In the result, I pass the following order.
ORDER
1. Reference is allowed with no order as to costs. 2. It is declared that the termination of the concerned workman on and from 23.5.13 is illegal. 3. The first party management is directed to pay the concerned workman his earned wages for the month of March '13, 14 days wages of the period of suspension from 1.4.13 and the wages from 15.4.13 to 22.5.13.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 35014. The concerned workman be reinstated at his original post with full back wages, continuity of service and other consequential benefits w.e.f. 23.5.13 till reinstatement.
Date: 29.03.2019
M.V. DESHPANDE, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 13 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-810.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj iatkc us'kuy cSad ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky;] bjukdqye ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 39@2013) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 13-05-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&12012@58@2013&vkbZ vkj (ch&II)]
lhek caly] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 13th May, 2019
S.O.810.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 39/2013) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ernakulam now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 13.05-2019.
[No. L-12012/58/2013–IR (B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
ERNAKULAM
Present : Shri. V.Vijaya Kumar, B.Sc., LLM, Presiding Officer
(Friday the 04th day of April, 2019)
ID No. 39 of 2013
Workmen
Shri. P.T. Mohammed Ashraf, Ottayil House, Chalappuram. P.O., Kozhikode - 2 By Adv. Ashok.B.Shenoy.
Management
: The Manager,
Punjab National Bank, Main Branch, P.B.No.11, K.P.KesavaMenon Road, Kozhikode – 673 030. By Adv. P. Ramakrishnan.
This case coming up for final hearing on 21.02.2019 and this Tribunal-cum-Labour Court on 04.04.2019 passed the following:
AWARD
1. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section(2A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act 14 of 1947) the Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No.L-12012/58/2013-IR(B-II) dated 08.08.2013 referred the following dispute for adjudication by this Tribunal.
"Whether the action of the Punjab National Bank, Kozhikode main branch in denying the payment of compensation, wages and terminal benefits to Shri. P.T. Mohammed Ashraf is correct? What relief he is entitled to?"3502 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] 2. The claimant was a Deposit Collector of Nedungadi bank Ltd., Later taken over by Punjab National Bank/Management. He joined Nedungadi bank as a Deposit Collector in June 1976 at their Kozhikode main branch. His services were terminated on 30.11.2002 because of the moratorium declared in Nedungadi Bank. His services were terminated without giving any notice or wages in lieu of notice and without paying any compensation contemplated under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act and without paying gratuity. His services were terminated under oral orders. According to him, his termination amounts to retrenchment. Since the action of the management is illegal, the workman claims wages in lieu of notice and compensation under section 25F of Industrial Dispute Act 1947. The Management is legally bound to pay the above compensation with 12% interest thereon.
3. The Management filed written statement denying all claims by the Workman. According to the Management the claimant is not a workman as defined under section 2(s) of the ID Act. There is no dispute contemplated under Section 2A and hence the compensation and terminal benefits cannot be adjudicated under Section 2A of the ID Act. The Workman workedupto 30.11.2002 and the ID is raised only in 2013. The delay in raising the dispute has caused substantial prejudice to the Management. The maintainability of the dispute and the validity of the reference is to be decided as a preliminary issue.
4. According to the Management, the Workman was not in the services of the branch at the time of amalgamation of Nedungadi bank with Punjab National Bank on 01.02.2003. The Workman was working as a Deposit Collector on the basis of agreement between him and the Nedungadi Bank,Main branch Kozhikode. Prior to or after amalgamation of Nedungadi Bank there was no retrenchment of any employee or Deposit Collector attached to any branch. The Workman abandoned his assignment for the reasons best known to him. One among the Deposit Collectors continues to work even after amalgamation. But the Workman never reported for duty after amalgamation. As per a joint settlement the Management paid the Workman eligiblegratuity. Since there is no retrenchment there is no legal requirement of any notice, notice pay or compensation.
Two preliminary issues were raised by the management.
" 1. Sri. PT Muhammed Ashraf is not aWorkman as defined under section 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.
2. The subject matter of reference is not a dispute coming under Section 2A of the Industrial Dispute Act. "
5. Issue 1: The question whether the Deposit Collectors are Workmen was considered in detail by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian Banks Association Vs. Workmen of Syndicate Bank and others, AIR 2001 Supreme Court 946. The Hon'ble SC concluded holding that, "Having been shown the relevant evidence we are also of the opinion that the Tribunal correctly arrived at a conclusion that these Deposit Collectors are Workmen". No further discussion on this issue is relevant and the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court settles the issue in favour of the Workman.
6. Issue 2 : The reference by Govt. Of India to this Tribunal for adjudication is whether the action of the Management in denying payment of wage and terminal benefits to the Workman is correct. The Management asserted the stand that since the dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or termination is not part of the reference,the case is not maintainable under Section 2A of the ID Act and the reference itself is bad in law. As per Section 2A(1) of the I D Act , "where an employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches or otherwise terminate the service of an individual workman, any dispute or difference between that workman and his employer connected with or arising out of such discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute".
A plain reading of the section will sufficiently indicate that any dispute between the employer and the employee in connection with or arising out of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute for the purpose of Section 2A of the Industrial Dispute Act. Hence it will be too technical to argue that the reference is bad in law as the retrenchment itself is not a part of reference. The dispute regarding non payment of terminal benefit to workman will fall under the scope and ambit of Section 2A of ID Act 1947. Hence this issue also is answered in favour of workman.
7. Having deciding the preliminary issues in favour of the Workman let us examine the reference on merits. The reference from Govt of India is to adjudicate,
"Whether the action of Punjab National Bank, Kozhikode, in denying the payment of compensation, wages, terminal benefits to Sri. Mohammed Ashraf is correct?What relief he is entitle to."
8. The case of the Workman is that he worked as a Deposit Collector in Nedungadi Bank, Kozhikode branch form June 1976 to 30.11.2002. His services were terminated on 30.11.2002 on account of the moratorium declared in Nedungadi Bank. His services were terminated without any notice or wages in lieu of notice or compensations contemplated under section 25F of ID Act 1947. The Workman was terminated on oral orders. The above termination amounts to retrenchment. Since the retrenchment is effected without notice, notice pay or compensation as stipulated under section 25F of I D Act 1947 the same is illegal, unjust and void. The retrenchment being illegal he is entitled to notice wages and compensation as provided under section 25 F of ID Act. The management refuse to pay the same in spite of repeated demands from his side.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 35039. Apart from the preliminary issues discussed above, the Management also raised a question of delay in raising the industrial dispute. According to the management the workmen worked till 30.11.2002. However the industrial dispute is raised only in 2013. Hence the industrial dispute is required to be rejected on the ground of delay and latches. The delay in raising the dispute has caused substantial prejudice to the Management. There were two Deposit Collectors working with Nedungadi Bank, Kozhikode branch at the time of amalgamation with Punjab National Bank. Apart from the workman, one Mr. P Peravakutty was also working in the same capacity in the same branch. At the time of amalgamation of Nedungadi Bank with PanjabNational Bank on 01.02.2003 the Workman was not in service of Nedungadi Bank. Prior to or after declaring moratorium, there was no retrenchment of any employee orDeposit Collector. The Workman abandoned his assignment under agreement for reasons best known to him. The Management also denied the allegation that the service of the Workman was terminated because of the moratorium declared in Nedungadi Bank. Section 25F of the ID Act is not applicable to Workman as he left his assignment with Nedungadi Bank even before amalgamation.
10. In the rejoinder the Workman denied the allegations of delay stating that he was claiming the benefits from the Management all along and filed a claim with Assistant Labour Commissioner on 21.06.2010. The Workman had gone abroad by the end of 2003 and since then he worked there for his and his families livelihood. Hence he could not raise the industrial dispute in time and delay if any, may be condoned as he is claiming mandatory benefit under the statute. He also denied the allegation that the Workman was not in service of Nedungadi Bank at the time of amalgamation with Punjab National Bank on 01.02.2003.
11. The Workman is examined as WW1 and marked Exhibits W1 to W5. The Management examined MW1 and MW2 and marked Exhibits M1 and M2.
12. There is no dispute regarding the fact that the workman was working as Deposit Collector in Nedungadi Bank, Kozhikode Main branch from 1976. It is also admitted that the Deposit Collectors are not regular employees and they work for the bank on the basis of the agreement executed between him and Branch Manager. The commission earned by the workman is credited to his bank account. These facts are proved through WW1 as well as exhibits W5 and W6. As per exhibit W6 the last commission paid by the Bank to the Workman was on 01.11.2002 for the period up to 31.10.2002. In his deposition the Workman (WW1) states that his residence is very close to the bank but he never approached the bank for continued employment. He further states that he never approached the bank also for compensation. Even in exhibit W2, which is a copy of the dispute filed before the Assistant Labour Commissioner on 21.06.2010 the workman has not indicated that he approached the bank earlier for compensation. MW1 is the other Deposit Collector who worked along with the Workman in Nedungadi Bank during the relevant time. According to him moratorium was declared in Nedungadi Bank from 11/2002 and was merged with Punjab National Bank after 3 months. During moratorium period though there was no ban, he never canvassed deposits as there was lot of negative publicity against the bank. This statement is ably supported by his bank statement (Exhibit M1). It is seen from Exhibit M1 that after 11/2002 he received SSD commission only on 10.02.2003, i.e. after the amalgamation. MW 1 further states that the workman never visited the bank during the moratorium period. He also stated that the services of none of the employees in Kozhikode main branch were terminated at the time of amalgamation. From his evidence it has also come out that he used to visit the bank during the moratorium period and he got a notice after amalgamation to exercise option if he is interested to continue as a Deposit Collector in Punjab National Bank. He also executed a separate agreement with Punjab National Bank. Ex W3 is the order of this court in CP 5 of 2010 dated 15.09.2010 awarding gratuity to the workman. Ex W6 is the bank statement of the Workman from 01.07.1996 to 30.03.2005.
13. On the basis of the pleadings and evidence available on record the following issues are framed for decision.
"1. Whether the reference is bad in law in view of the delay in raising the industrial dispute?"
2. Whether there is retrenchment/termination of the Workman on account of moratorium In Nedungadi Bank?
3. Whether the workman is entitled to any relief claimed by him?
14. Issues1 &2: As per the provisions of section 10(1) of the ID Act 1947, the appropriate govt. may at any time refer an industrial dispute for adjudication if it is of the opinion that such an industrial dispute between the employer and employee exists or is apprehended. It has already been clarified by the Apex Court of the land in various judgements that in view of the wording of section 10(1) the provisions of limitation Act is not applicable to references. However the Court also sounded a note of caution that reference shall be made within reasonable time considering the facts and circumstances of each case.
15. The learned Council for the workman referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raghubir Singh Vs. General Manager, Haryana Road Ways, 2014 KHC 4556, to drive home his point that provisions of Limitation Act is not applicable to reference under Industrial Dispute Act. In that case, the appellant was a conductor in Hariyana Road Ways and in the year 1993 he was charged under Section 409 of IPC in a criminal case. The appellant was arrested and sent to judicial custody on 05.09.1994. On 21.10.1994 the service of the appellant was terminated by the GM Haryana Road Ways. On 11.07.2002 he was acquitted by the court and when he reported for duty he was informed that he was terminated from service with effect from 21.10.1994. Thereafter he started adjudication3504 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] proceedings under Industrial Dispute Act. The Industrial Tribunal dismissed the claim of the appellant on the ground of delay. And from that order he has approached the High Court and ultimately the Supreme Court. In this contest the Hon'ble Supreme Court ordered that in the circumstances of the present case it cannot be said that there is delay in raising the industrial dispute asthe workman was fighting the case all along before various forums. The facts of the above case may not be relevant in this particular case. The allegation of the Workman is that he is retrenched in the year 2002. Whereas his first claim for compensation was filed only in 2010. Though there is a vague statement that he was approaching the bank for compensations there is no evidence other than his own statement. In the case of Agricultural Marketing Board Kota Vs. Mohanlal 2013(14)SCC 543 the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that " we are clearly of the view that though Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made under Industrial Dispute Act 1947, but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important circumstance which the labour court must keep in view at the time of exercising discretion irrespective of whether or not such objection has been raised by the other side". Hence it will be relevant to consider factors including the mode and manner of appointment, nature of employment, length of service, and the delay in raising the industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute. The only ground that is pleaded by the Workman is that he left the country in search of job to take care of himself and his family. It is also relevant to note that the Workman never approached the bank for his employment but approached the authorities after 8 years for compensation. The workman also relied on the decision of Hon Supreme Court, in D K Yadav Vs. JMA Industries(1993)3 Supreme Court Cases 259. The facts of this case also isnot relevant to the present situation as the facts of the above case is related to the wilful absence of the appellant from duty continuously for more than8 days and related to standing order. The learned Counsel for the Workman also referred to the decision of Hon'ble High Courtof Kerala, in Abdul Salam S Vs Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd 2017 KHC 713 on the question of abandonment of duties. The facts leading to this case is also not relevant as the workman in the above case was a regular employee of KSEB who is alleged to have remained continuously absent from duties leading to his dismissal from service without an enquiry. It will be more appropriate to refer to the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in Vijay S Sathaye Vs. Indian Air Lines Ltd, 2013 KHC 4712 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed "Absence from duty in the beginning may be misconduct but where the absence is for long period it may amount to voluntary abandonment of service and in that eventuality, the bonds of service comes to an end automatically without requiring any order to be passed by the employer". The decision of Honble Supreme Court in PrabhakarVs. Joint Director, Seri Culture Department 2016 KHC 3373 referred to by the learned Council for Management may be more relevant in the circumstances of the present case. This is a case where the service of an employee of a department was terminated and he raised an industrial dispute after 14 years. The Hon'ble Court pointed out that in such cases party who did not make any objection acquiesced into the alleged wrongful act of the Management and has no right to complain against that alleged wrong. In such cases the Hon'ble Supreme Court pointed out that the Labour Court is justified in holding that the delay or lapses in raising the dispute cut the very root of the industrial dispute raised by the Workman.
16. In view of the above judgements and the facts of the present case I am of the considered view that the delay in raising the industrial dispute will go against the claim of the Workman.
17. In the present case the Workman was a Deposit Collector working with Nedungadi Bank, Kozhikode Branch. Deposit Collectors are not regular employees, but work on the basis of agreement with Bank branches to mobilise funds. The Workman did not attend the Bank after moratorium is declared in Nedungadi Bank on 30.11.2002 nor claimed his job after the amalgamation with Punjab National Bank in February 2003. MW2 who was another Deposit Collector working in the same Branch, claimed his job, exercised his option and signed a new agreement and continued working with Punjab National Bank after amalgamation. The Workman went abroad and filed his claim for compensation in 2010, after ten years. As it has come out in evidence, the Workman is staying very close to the Bank. As a prudent man he should have approached Punjab National Bank, Kozhikode Main branch after amalgamation and claimed his job as Deposit Collector. In case he is refused the job, he should have approached the authorities with his claim for compensation within a reasonable time. Admittedly the workman never approached the Bank/Management for his job and approached the Assistant Labour Commissioner (C) for compensation after 8 long years.
18. The Workman claims that he is retrenched from service by the Management when moratorium is declared in Nedungadi Bank. According to the Management the Workman abandoned his service. As pointed out by Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Abdul Salam Vs KSEB, 2017 KHC 713
"The word abandonment semantically means the act of intentionally and permanently giving up, surrendering, deserting or relinquishing. Hence each case will have to be decided with reference to the particular facts available and a conclusion as to whether unauthorised in a specific instance has metamorphosed into abandonment will have to be made on a case to case basis after such evaluation. "
19. According to the Hon'ble High Court in Abdul Salam case (Supa) the three elements present in abandonment are (1) the employees is absent without employers' authority (2) he has not been in contact with the employer for substantially long period of time to explain why he is absent and (3) his intention not to report to work.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 350520. On the other hand, retrenchment under Section 2 (00) of the Industrial Dispute Act means the termination by employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever.The definition of retrenchment contemplates that these has to be a termination by the employer".With the introduction of the words "for any reason whatsoever" the definition got a wider connotation. As pointed out by Hon'ble High Court of Chennai in English Electric Company of India Vs Industrial Tribunal, Chennai, 1987-1-LLJ 141(Mad) the fact remains that whenever it is claimed that there is a retrenchment, it must necessarily be established that there is a termination by employer. In State of Himachal Pradesh and Others Vs Presiding Officer and another, 2006-III. LLJ 527(HP) it was held that abandonment of a job by workman amount to voluntary retirement and therefore would not be retrenchment.
21. When the facts of the present case along with the evidence, as discussed above, is superimposed on the law laid down in above cases, it can be fairly concluded that it is a case of abandonment of service rather than retrenchment by the employer.
Hence issues Nos.1 and 2 are answered against the Workman.
22. Issue No. 3 In View of the findings on issue Nos.1 and 2, the Workman is not entitled to any benefit claimed by him.
23. In the result an award is passed finding that the action of Management is denying the payment of compensation, wages and terminal benefits to the Workman is fully justified. The Workman is not entitled to any benefit claimed by him.
The award will came into force one month after it publication in the official Gazette.
Dictated to the Assistant, transcribed and typed by him and passed by me on this 4th day of April 2019.
V. VIJAYA KUMAR, Presiding Officer
APPENDIX
Witness for Workman
WW1 11.05.2016 P.T.Mohamad Ashraf
Witness for Management
MW1 07.10.2016 Peravakutty MW2 19.05.2017 Srinivasan K. N.
Exhibits for Workman
W1 True copy of the Passport issued to the workman dated 28.07.2003
W2 True copy of the ID filed by the workman dated 21.06.2010
W3 True copy of the order in CP 5/2010 dated 15.09.2010
W4 True copy of the joint statement of settlement of Gratuity before Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ernakulam dated 17.10.2013
W5 True copy of the employment cum salary certificate issued to the Workman by the Management dated 07.08.2001
W6 True copy of the statement of accounts of the workman maintained at Punjab National Bank, SB Account No.9015 from 01.01.1996 to 30.03.2005.
Exhibits for Management
M1 True copy of the statement of Account of Shri.P.Peravakutty maintained at Punjab National Bank, SB Account No.10700 from 01.07.1996 to 26.08.2005.
M2 Letter from Manager, Punjab National Bank to Senior Manager HRD along with list of SSD collectors of NBC in Calicut Region.
3506 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-811.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ mi egkfuns'kd] jk"Vªh; lwpuk foKku dsanz gSnjkckn vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn&1 ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 60@2014) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&42012@49@2013&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.811.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 60/2014) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Hyderabad-1 now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation tor The Deputy Director General, National Informatics Centre, Hyderabad & Others, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 18.04.2019.
[No. L-42012/49/2013–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present : Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 25th day of March, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 60/2014
Between
Sri C.M. Sunil, H.No. 2-3-475, Nallagutta, Kachibowli, Minister Road, Secunderabad. …Petitioner
AND
1. The Deputy Director General, National Informatics Centre, A- Block, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad -500 063. 2. Shri K. Srinivasa Rao, M/s. Coastal Industrial Security Service, C/o The Deputy Director General, National Informatics Centre, A- Block, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad -500 063. …Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Sri U.D. Jai Bhima Rao, Advocate
For the Respondent : M/s. K. Rajitha & M. Venkata Swamy, Advocates
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L-42012/ 49/2013-IR(DU) dated 19.3.2014 referred the following dispute between the management of M/s. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., and their workman under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal. The reference is,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3507
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the Management of Coastal Industrial Security Service and NIC over the matter of retrenchment of Shri C.M. Sunil and 12 others from services w.e.f. 31.3.2012 is legal and justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to ?"
The reference is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 60/2014 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner.
3. The case was posted for filing of claim statement by the Petitioner. Inspite of availing several opportunities, the Petitioner remained absent and there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Non-appearance of the workman and non-filing of claim statement in time, clearly indicates that perhaps the parties have settled their dispute and the workman has no claim to raise. Hence, it is not desirable to linger the case to any further date. Thus, the case of the workman is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 25th day of March, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the
Petitioner Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-812.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd] lSU; QkeZ] eq[;ky;] paMheafnj vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] paMhx<+ ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 1@2009) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-03-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-&14012@21@2008&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.812.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 1//2009) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Chandigarh now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation tor The Director Military Farms. Headquarter, Chandimandir & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 18.03.2019.
[No. L-14012/21/2008–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer3508 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
In the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Chandigarh
Present: Sh. A.K. Singh, Presiding Officer
ID No.1/2009
Registered on 01.05.2009
Sh. Rakesh Kumar, S/o Sh. Kishori Lal, C/o Sh. Vijay Sharma, H.No.42, Village Khera Sita Ram, Kalka, Tehsil and Post Office Kalka, District Panchkula(Haryana).
…Workman
Versus
The Director, Military Farms, Headquarter, Western Command(Farms Branch), Chandimandir-134107.
...Management
AWARD
Passed on 11.02.2019
Central Government vide Notification No. L-14012/21/2008-IR(DU) Dated 23.03.2009, under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(hereinafter called the Act), has referred the following Industrial dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-
"Whether the action of the management of Director, Military Farms, HQ, Western Command, (Farms Branch), Chandimandir, in terminating the services of their workman Sh. Rakesh Kumar w.e.f. 11.08.2008 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled to?"
1. The facts, in brief, are that Sh. Rakesh Kumar, workman was appointed as Computer Operator vide letter dated 22.12.2001 on job basis and was posted at Military Farm at Dagshai in District Solan H.P. He was paid Rs.3,000/- as monthly consolidated salary through cheques. Later on, he was directed to report at office of Director Military Farm Head Quarter Chandimandir for duty till Smt. Dimple Singla resumes duty as she was on maternity leave. The workman worked at aforesaid establishment upto August 2004 and joined Military Farm at Dagshai in District Solan H.P on 16.08.2004 after joining of Smt. Dimple Singla. During the continuation of service, he was deputed on temporary basis at Military Farms School and Centre Meerut Cantt. from Military Farm Dagshai to note down the minutes of conference of Senior Military Farm Officer held at Meerut Cantt. He was entrusted the job of Stenographer-cum-Personal Assistant- cum-Computer Operator in the Office of Director Military Farm Headquarter Western Command, Chandimandir by the Director Sh. Col. B.K. Reddy w.e.f. 16.07.2005. Consequently, on the recommendation of the Director Kashmira Singh, his salary was increased Rs.5,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.06.2007 till permanent posting. Sh. N.R. Kulkarni took over the charge from Sh. Kashmira Singh as Director and on 08.08.2008, Col. N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farm Headquarter, Western Command Chandimandir verbally ordered the workman not to report for duty w.e.f. 11.08.2008 without assigning any reason. The action of the management terminating the services of the workman without giving him any notice or without any retrenchment compensation or without passing any reasoned order is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of Sections 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He has completed more than 240 days in each calendar year up to the date of his termination of service. The workman has requested that management be directed to be reinstated him in service with continuity of service and full back wages.
2. Respondent-management filed written statement and submitted that workman has not approached to the Court with clean hands by filing present petition. It is alleged that if applicant has any grievances, he can approach to Central Administrative Tribunal only as respondent-management is not a 'Industry' and petition is not maintainable in view of the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. Respondent-management has further alleged that workman was engaged on job basis/outsourcing as Computer Operator in the Office of the respondent-management, which was purely temporary to save public money in the best interest of the state to get better results as per Para 178 to 185 of General Fundamental Rules, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. The applicant/workman has no right to reinstate in service as the workman was not holding any regular post in the respondent-management. The Military Farm Department is a Defence Installation and is not an Ïndustry"as their employees are treated as non-industrial labourers were engaged on as and when required basis. It is alleged that respondent-management had offered workman while attending Lok Adalat on 25.08.2010 at Chandigarh by OIC Military Farm Ambala at the Station HQ sanctioned rates, but workman refused to accept the same. The temporary workman cannot be reinstated as per law. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute as respondent-department is involving in sovereign functions of Ministry of Defence. Respondent-management has averred in Para 1 to 6 that representation dated September 2008, regarding termination by way of verbal order of Dir MF on 08.08.2008 issued by Offg Dir MF on 11.08.2008 along with pay bill dated 19.09.2008 for Rs.1,833/- for the period from 01.08.2008 to 11.08.2008 submitted by the workman. Respondent-management has denied that Col N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farms Headquarters, Western Command, Chandimandir verbally order[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3509 the workman not to report for duty from 11.08.2008. It is also submitted that workman has left the job at his own accord w.e.f. 12.08.2008. The fact alleged in the claim petition is wholly misconceived and is just a figment of imagination borne out of self-guilt. Hence, petition is liable to be dismissed with heavy cost to secure the ends of justice. .
3. In support of his case, the workman examined himself and filed his affidavit Ex.A1, reiterating the case as set out in the claim petition.
4. On the other hand, respondent-management has examined Sh. Ravi Jain, Manager Military Farm, who filed his affidavit Ex.R1 reiterating the case as set out in the written statement.
5. Heard the arguments of learned counsel of workman Sh. R.P. Rana and learned counsel for the management Sh. Arun Batra and have carefully gone through the evidence led by both the parties and given thoughtful consideration raised by the learned counsels during the course of arguments.
6. Before appreciating the bone of contention between the parties, it will be beneficial to mention that this is a case in which management has admitted that workman was employed by the respondent-management vide letter dated 16.07.2005. It is also not disputed that services of workman abruptly come to an end from 11.08.2008. In this connection, as per workman and his counsel, Col N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farm Headquarter, Western Command, Chandimandir on 08.08.2008 verbally ordered that workman will not report for duty from 11.08.2008 without assessing any reason while case put up by the management is that workman has left the job at its own without assigning any reason to the management. So far as the appointment of the workman from 01.01.2002 is concerned. He has tendered his affidavit as Ex.A-1, which is in consonance of the fact alleged in the claim petition with the averment that he was appointed initially on 01.01.2002 as Computer Operator on job basis. In this connection, annexure M-1, M-2 and M-3 are relevant, which are executed by the management. Ex.M-1 is the letter of employment issued by Col. P.K. Tikoo dated 14.12.2001, regarding the selection of workman Rakesh Kumar while Ex.M-3 is the reference letter, which is executed by Col. B.K. Reddy dated 31.05.2007, which reveals that workman Rakesh Kumar accorded payment at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.06.2007 till posting of permanent Personal Assistant-cum-Computer Operator. M- 2 is letter issued by Sh. Kashmira Singh, ADMF for enhancement of pay of workman from 4,000/- to 5,000/- alleging therein that he is working since January 2002. Sanctity of all these documents are admitted by the management witness Sh. Ravi Jain in his cross-examination. Thus, it is very clear from oral as well as documentary evidence that workman was in the employment of management from 01.01.2002 to 08.08.2008 when he was allegedly ordered not to report from 11.08.2008 by Col. N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farm Headquarter, Western Command, Chandimandir. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the management accepted that workman was very much in the employment of the management from the beginning as was also accepted by Sh. Ravi Jain, Manager, Military Farm, Dagshai, during the course of his cross-examination by the learned counsel for the management.
7. During the course of arguments, the issue raised by the learned counsel for the management is that this Tribunal has not got jurisdiction to decide the reference referred by the appropriate government because management is a sovereign body working under Government of India. Thus, it does not come within the purview of industry as defined in Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, this Tribunal has got no power according to the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, which rests jurisdiction to the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the dispute between the parties. Furthermore, learned counsel has contended that it is a workman who left the management at his own without any reason and he was not forced to left the job as alleged by the workman in his petition as well as in affidavit filed as evidence. It is also contended that his appointment was on job basis for a particular time as specifically mentioned in Letter M-2, issued by the management as such, he does not fall within the definition of workman.
8. The first contention is regarding the claimant to be a workman even if he was appointed on job basis for a particular time or subject to regular appointment to the Post of Personal Assistant-cum-Computer Operator. To my mind, the claimant is a workman within the definition of Section 2(S) of the Act. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision in the case of Devinder Singh Vs. Municipal Council, Sanaur, AIR 2011 Supreme Court 2532, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court while interpreting the provisions of Section 2(S) of the Act which deals with the definition of "workman" has observed as under :-
"The source of employment, the quantum of recruitment, the terms & conditions of employment/ contract of
service, the quantum of wages/ pay and mode of payment are not at all relevant for deciding whether or not a
person is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Act. The definition of workman also does not
make any distinction between full time and part time employee or a person appointed on contract basis.
There is nothing in the plain language of Section 2(s) from which it can be inferred that only person
employed on regular basis or a person employed for doing whole time job is a workman and the one
employed on temporary, part time or contract basis on fixed wages or as a casual employee or for doing duty
for fixed hours is not a workman."
3510 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]9. It is clear from the perusal of aforesaid observations that even if a person is engaged on temporary, part time or contract basis or for doing any other kind of work and is duly paid wages for the said work, in that eventuality such a person would be covered by the definition of "workman" as provided in Section 2(S) of the Act.
As discussed above, in the case in hand, engagement of the claimant was of regular basis as Personal Assistant-cum-Computer Operator with the respondent-management and Tribunal has no hesitation to hold that there is relationship of employer and employee between the workman and management since 01.01.2002 to 11.08.2008.
10. Vital question which arises for consideration is whether management does not come within the definition of "Industry" as is argued by the learned counsel of the management. It the worthwhile to mention here that the definition of 'industry' as provided under Section 2(J) of the Act, is in two parts. In its first part it means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers. This part of definition determines an industry by reference to occupation of employers in respect of certain activities. These activities are specified by five words and they determine when an industry is and what the cognate expression 'industrial' is intended to convey. The second part views the matter from the angle of employees and is designed to include something more in what the term primarily denotes. This part gives extended connotation. If the activity can be described as an industry with reference to the occupation of the employers, the ambit of the industry, under the force of the second part, takes in the different kinds of activity of the employees mentioned in the second part. But, the second part alone cannot define 'industry'. An industry is not to be found in every case of employment or service. By the inclusive part of the definition the labour force employed in an industry is made an integral part of the industry for purposes of industrial disputes although industry is ordinarily something which employers create or undertake. Before the work engaged in by an employer can be described against industry, it must bear the definite character of 'trade' or 'business' or 'manufacture' or 'calling' or must be capable of being described as an undertaking resulting in material goods or material services. Where an activity is to be considered as an industry, it must not be casual but must be distinctly systematic and the wok for which workmen are employed must be productive and the workmen must be following an employment, calling or industrial avocation. The word 'industry' must take its colour from the definition and that it discloses that a workman is to be regarded as one employed in an industry if he is following one of the vocations mentioned in conjunction with his employers engaged in the vocation mentioned in relation to the employers."
11. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Banglore Water Supply & Sewerage Board Vs. A. Rajappa 1978(36) FLR 266 dealt at length with the ambit and scope of expression "industry" as defined in Section 2(J) of the Act and held as under:-
"(a) Where a complex of activities some of which qualify for exemption, others not involves employees on
the total undertaking some of whom are not "workman" as in the University of Delhi case (supra) or some
departments are not productive of goods and services, if isolated, even then the predominant nature of the
services and integrated nature of the departments as explained in the Corporation of Nagpur (supra) will be
the true test. The whole undertaking will be "industry" although those who are not 'workmen' by
definition may not benefit by the status.
(b) Notwithstanding the previous clauses, sovereign functions strictly understood (alone) qualify for
exemption not the welfare activities or economic adventures undertaken by Government or Statutory
bodies.
(c) Even in departments discharging sovereign functions, if there are units which are industries and they
are substantially severable, they can be considered to come within section 2(j).
(d) Constitutional and competently enacted legislative provisions way well remove from the scope of the Act
categories which otherwise may be covered thereby.
(e) We overrule Safdarjung (supra), Solicitors' case (supra), Gymkhana (supra), Delhi University (supra),
Dhanrajgiri Hospital (supra) and other ruling whose ratio runs counter to the principles enunciated above
and Hospital Mazdoor Sabha (supra) is hereby rehabilitated."
In the light of above observations and admitted facts of management Farm is meant for providing milk and milk product for supply to Military establishment. To my mind, it is an industry and this Tribunal has got the power to decide the reference sent by appropriate Government.
12. Similarly, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the management regarding the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal and Industrial Tribunal I find no force in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Telecom District Manager & others. Vs. Keshab Deb.(Civil Appeal No.3324 of 2008 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.9494 of 2004-decided on 6/5/2008 where a driver/casual labour on daily wage basis, serving in the Directorate of Telecommunicaitons at Dimapur, had filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Gauhati by the workman, challenging the order of his termination by his employer and the Gauhati Bench of CAT had passed an order, holding the termination order to be illegal. Before the Apex Court, the department/employer had raised the contention as regards jurisdiction of the CAT. The Hon'ble Supreme Court while holding that an[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3511 employee who claims himself to be a workman, will have a right of election in the matter of choice of forum either before Industrial Tribunal or before Central Administrative Tribunal, observed in para 14 as under:-
"In a case of the present nature where inter alia a employee maintains a writ petition not only on the
ground of violation of equality clause enshrines under Article 14 of the Constitution of India but also on
the ground of violation of provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, he has an option to choose his
own forum. Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 does not bar the jurisdiction of the Central
Administrative Tribunal. It saves the jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal. An employee who claims
himself to be a workman, therefore, will have a right of election in the matter of choice of forum......"
13. Learned counsel for the workman has submitted that services of the workman have been terminated with oral order dated 08.08.2008 by Col. N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farm Headquarter, Western Command Chandimandir not to report for duty from 11.08.2008 without assigning any reason and notice or enquiry. Per contra, it is pleaded and argued by the learned counsel for the management that workman has abandoned the job at his own without any prior information. Hence, question of issuance notice and payment of salary for one month in lieu of retrenchment or termination is not required as per Law. It is relevant and pertinent to mention that either party has not adduce any cogent evidence in this connection, and if it is so, no material has been produced by the workman to substantiate that the workman has not allowed to discharged the duties of the post by issuing communication to the respondent-management. At the same time, the respondent-management has not issued any notice in writing asking the workman to report back to duty, if he remained unauthorised absent or absented himself w.e.f. 11.08.2008 as contended by the learned counsel for the management. There is no correspondence between the workman and management in respect of service condition of the workman. Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court dealing with the Writ Petition No.8898/1994 (O&M) dated 30.11.2016, 2017 LLR 95, Kali Ram vs. Presiding Officer and Another, has held that in such a situation, the contention of the respondent-management that workman has abandoned the services is not acceptable because of non-issuance of show cause notice to join the service back to the workman. Having regard to the conduct of workman and respondent- management insofar as perusing the issue relating to taking back to duty or abandoned the service is concerned, there are lapses and it is the management, who has to issue show cause notice to join service. Thus, Hon'ble High Court has laid down that it was the duty of management at least to issue a show cause notice regarding the joining of service to the workman but that has not done in this case. To my mind it is not the workman who has left his job on his own rather than he was forced to left the work by Col. N.R. Kulkarni, Director Military Farm Headquarter, Western Command Chandimandir.
14. Now the residual question is whether the claimant/workman is entitled to any incidental relief of payment of back wages and/or reinstatement of service with full back wages. It is proved on record that workman was continuously in the employment of the management from 22.12.2001 to 11.08.2008 on regular basis. There is no show cause notice or memo issued to the workman by the management. Moreover, the job of the workman is of perennial and regular nature. Though, the workman has not pleaded anything about his employment but he has alleged in his affidavit that he is unemployed from the date of his termination. The management has not pleaded and adduced any evidence to show that the workman is gainfully employed. Thus, nothing is brought on record by the management that workman was employed somewhere after his termination.
15. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case of "Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junion Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya" reported as (2013) 10 SCC 324 has held as under:-
"The propositions which can be culled out from the aforementioned judgments are:
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is
the normal rule.
ii) Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least make a statement before the adjudicating authority or the Court of first instance that he/she was not gainfully employed or was employed on lesser wages. If the employer wants to avoid payment of full back wages, then I has to plead and also lead cogent evidence to prove that the employee/workman was gainfully employed and was getting wages equal to the wages he/she was drawing prior to the termination of service. This is so because it is settled law that the burden of proof of the existence of a particular fact lies on the person who makes a positive averments about its existence. It is always easier to prove a positive fact than to prove a negative fact. Therefore, once the employee shows that he was employed, the onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employee was gainfully employed and was getting the same or substantially similar emoluments."
16. Yet in another latest case of Bholanath Lal and others v. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd., Manu/DE/1922/2018 (decided on 10.05.2018), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while considering the question of illegal termination and reinstatement held as under:-
"The cases in which the competent court or tribunal finds that the employer has acted in gross violation of the
statutory provisions and/or the principles of natural justice or is guilty of victimizing the employee or
3512 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]workman, then the court or tribunal concerned will be fully justified in directing payment of full back wages.
In such cases, the superior courts should not exercise power under Article 226 or 136 of the Constitution and
interfere with the award passed by the Labour Court, etc. merely because there is a possibility of forming a
different opinion on the entitlement of the employee/workman to get full back wages or the employer's
obligation to pay the same The courts must always keep in view that that in the cases of wrongful/illegal
termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and the sufferer is the employee./workman and there is
no justification to give a premium to the employer of his wrongdoings by relieving him of the burden to pay to
the employee/ workman his dues in the form of full back wages."
A similar view has been taken in the case of Delhi Jal Board Vs. Vimal Kumar (decided on 5-4-2018) MANU/de/1322/2018 wherein service of a casual driver was terminated without any notice or payment of one month's salary in lieu of such notice. The Industrial Tribunal answering the reference held the action of the management to be illegal and in violation of Section 25-F of the Act. The Award was upheld by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by observing as under :-
"In view of the above discussion, I am unable to discern any illegality or infirmity in the impugned Award, dated 29th May, 2003, of the Labour Court, to the extent that it holds the termination of the services of the respondent, by the petitioner, to be illegal and unlawful. I am entirely in agreement with the finding, of the Labour Court, that the services of the respondent were retrenched in violation of Section 25-F of the ID Act and that, therefore, he was entitled to be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. In view of the fact that going by the age of the respondent as disclosed in the counter affidavit filed before this Court, he would, today, be only 50 years of age, and also in view of the fact that the termination of his services as SCM Driver was not on account of any deficiency or shortcoming detected in the manner of discharge by the respondent, of his duties as such, I am of the opinion, that the facts of the present case, do not warrant any interference with the direction, of the Labour Court, to the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service with the benefit of continuity of service. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to reinstate the respondent in service forthwith.
Inasmuch as the respondent has not been rendering any service to the petitioner since the date of his
termination, however, the back wages payable to the respondent would be limited to 50 per cent of the wages
which he would have drawn he had continued to serve the petitioner….."
17. Having regard to the legal position said above and the facts that the claimant/workman was performing duty of perennial nature. This Tribunal is of the firm view that the claimant/workman is entitled for reinstatement in service on the same post with 50% back wages inasmuch as the termination of the workman is per se illegal and the claimant/workman is not gainfully employed since the termination by the management. Award is passed accordingly.
18. Let copy of this award be sent to the Central Government for publication as required under Section 17 of the ID Act, 1947.
A.K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-813.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ egkizca/kd] cSad uksV izsl] nsokl (ei)z vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 73@2005) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y&16012@01@2005&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.813.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 73//2005) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The General Manager, Bank Note Press, Dewas (MP) & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 23.04-2019.
[No. L-16012/01/2005–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3513
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOR COURT, JABALPUR
NO. CGIT/LC/R/73/2005
1.Sumitra Bohare, 2.Manoj Bohare, 3.Jitendra Bohare, 4.Sheela Bohare, LRs of deceased workman Ramchandra Bohrey H.No.70, Subhash Marg, Kannod, Distt. Dewas, Dewas MP. …Workman/LRs
Versus
General Manager, Bank Note Press, Dewas (MP) …Management
AWARD
Passed on this Ist day of April 2019
1. As per letter dated 15-7-2005 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-16012/1/2005- IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Bank Note Press, Dewas in terminating the services of Shri Ramchandra Bohare w.e.f. 15-3-83 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties. Workman filed statement of claim wherein he alleged that he was first appointed as temporary labor (Printing) on 27-7-79. Thereafter he was appointed on regular basis on 23-11-1979 in pay scale 196-3-220-EB-3-272 as temporary labor(printing) under probation for one year from 24-11- 1979. On medical reasons, he remained absent from duty in June for 8 working days without salary, 5 days leave on half pay in July, 5 days Leave without pay in August, 1day half pay in October, 1 day leave without pay in November, 7 days half pay in April, 14 days Leave Without pay in May, 16 days absence in August, 5 days absence in September. ½ day absence in November 1982. On month absence in February 1983 & 12 days absence in March 1983. He was served a notice of discharge on 8-3-1983 wherein, he was discharged after giving him salary of period shorter than 30 days, the discharge was ordered on 15-3-1983. He raised a dispute with appropriate Authority where a compromise was entered in to between him and the employers and employees agreed him to take him in fresh engagement if his name is sponsored by Employment Exchange in case vacancy arises. It is further his case that he was engaged on the basis of a sponsorship by Employment Exchange for a period from 9-2-1989 to 14-5-1989 but again he was discharged from service. He filed a petition before CAT, Jabalpur which was O.A. No. 326/99, disposed vide order dated 21-1-2003. The Tribunal dismissed the petition as not maintainable giving the workman liberty to approach before proper forum. It was further alleged that his discharge was against CCS(T.S.) Rules 1965, without giving him formal charge sheet which was against rules of natural justice. It is also his case that he was discharged in violation of provision of Section 25-F of ID Act. Accordingly, he requested that he be reinstated after setting aside his discharge.
3. The employers pleaded in their Written Statement of defense that he was appointed as labor (printing) on a temporary post which was likely to continue with a probation of one year vide proposal dated BNP/V/72/79 dated 23-11-1979. It was specifically provided in his offer of appointment that his services could be dispensed with at any time without assigning any reason, after giving one month notice or one month salary. It was the case of employers in their Written Statement that after his appointment, he neglected his duties and absented himself unauthorizedly. A charge sheet dated 1-9-1982 was issued to him and his increment was stopped for 3 months as punishment. Even after this, he did not improve himself then using the powers in Central Civil Services (Temporary Service Rules) 1965- Rule 5(1), the Appointing Authority terminated his services from 15-3-83 giving him one month notice. The workman filed an appeal against this order which was dismissed after consideration vide order dated 15-4-83 passed by the Appellate Authority. During the proceedings before Labor Commissioner, an understanding was reached between the parties that the employers may consider the workman for employment if he was sponsored by Employment Exchange with regard to any vacancy arising in future. Against some vacancies with the establishment, his name was sent by Employment Exchange along with 32 other names whereas the number of vacancies was only two and the workman was not found suitable for the post. It was also pleaded that his appointment on 24-11-79 was purely temporary and was lawfully dismissed by Appointing Authority using his powers under Rule 5(1) of CCS (Temporary Service) Rules 1965. Accordingly, it has been prayed that reference be decided against the workman.
4. Workman preferred rejoinder wherein he broadly denied the pleadings of management in their written statement of defense.
3514 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]5. At evidence stage, the workman examined himself on oath and proved memorandum dated 30-6-79, office order, appointment letter dated 23-11-79, office order dated 30-11-79, withdrawal of notice dated 30-4-81, letter written by workman w.r.t. charge dated 11-9-82 punishment order dated 15-10-82, termination notice dated 8-3-83, termination order dated 15-3-83, order regarding dismissal of appeal dated 15-4-1983. Memorandum dated 1-6-83 regarding dismissal of appeal and other documents referred to as and when required. They are Exhibit W-1 to W-20 respectively.
6. The employers have examined the Administrative Officer Shri K.K.Pandit on oath.
It is further to mention here that this reference was decided by my learned predecessor and award was passed on 15-4-2015 holding the termination of services of workman w.e.f. 15-3-83 not proper and legal and thereby directing the employers to pay lumpsum compensation to the widow of the workman because the workman deceased during the pendency of the reference. The employer preferred writ petition against the award which was Writ Petition No. 6954/2015 & 8025/2015. These two writs were decided together by Hon'ble High Court of MP vide order dated 16-3-2017. The Hon'ble High Court set-aside the award and remanded the case back to this Tribunal for a fresh decision in the light of observations made in the judgment.. This order was further reviewed by Hon'ble High Court in RP No. 125/2017 vide order dated 4-4-2017 substituting the rules of Central Civil Services (Temporary Service)Rules 1965 with Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)Rules 1965.
7. I have heard argument of Mr. Parashar for workman and Shri N.K.Salunke for employer and I have gone through the record.
8. Perusal of record in the light of rival argument reveals that following points for determination arise in the case in hand:
(1) Whether the action of the management of General Manager, Bank Note Press, Dewas in terminating
the services of Shri Ramchandra Bohare w.e.f. 15-3-83 is justified?
(2) If the answer to the point No.1 is in Negative, what relief the workman is entitled to
9. Point for determination No.1-
The workman died during pendency of reference. His LRs Smt. Sumitra Bohare,Manoj Bohare, Jitendra Bohare & Ku.sheela Bohare are allowed to be brought on record. In support of his claim, workman filed affidavit of his evidence supporting his claim that he was appointed as temporary labor on 10-7-79. His services were regularised by order dated 23-11-79 on Pay Scale Rs. 196 from 30-11-79, he was allowed benefit of Pay Scale 96-3-220-232. The memo prior to 30-4-79 relating to strike was withdrawn. He was operated of tubectomy ( family Planning) on 8-9-81, allowing increment Rs.3/-. He was served with chargesheet on 1-9-82 alleging unauthorized absence from duty. The chargesheet was replied by him denying allegations. By order dated 15-10-82, his increment was stopped for 3 months without cumulative effect. Workman has also narrated his absence from duty claiming that he was granted leave of different types including commuted leave. Workman in his cross-examination says he was appointed on 10-7-79 though he was called on work from 5-7-79. As per order dated 30-9-79, he was appointed on probation. On 9-2-82, charge sheet was issued to him. Any charge sheet was not issued to him before termination of his service. His 3 increments were withheld for 3 months on charge sheet issued earlier to him, the show cause notice issued to him was in respect of strike. He was not served with any notice.
10. Management's witness Shri K.K.Pandit filed detailed affidavit supporting contentions of management that in offer of appointment, the light of terminating service of workman paying one month salary in lieu of notice. Ist party workman is temporary employee. The charge sheet was issued to him on 16-8-82, the increment of workman was withheld for 3 months. Workman did not show any improvement. The services of workman were terminated under Rule 5(1) of Temporary Service Rules 1965 from 15-3-83. Workman had filed original application 326/99 before CAT. Said petition was dismissed with liberty to the workman to approach proper forum. Management's witness in his cross- examination denies that workman was sanctioned leave. However management's witness agrees that no DE was held against workman before terminating his services. Management's witness denies that services of workman are terminated for Union activities. Management's witness admits that Appellate Authority remanded the matter. He further explains that direction was given by RLC.
11. Documentary evidence on record Exhibit M-1 is copy of order dated 23-11-79 workman was appointed temporary as labor. Condition of appointment are given in para-2 that the services of workman were terminable giving one months notice or salary in lieu of notice. Annexure R-2 though admitted has not been exhibited. Order dated 10-10-82 was passed with-holding increment of Ist party workman for 3 months. R-3 is order of dismissal dated 15-3-83. Identical documents are produced by workman also. Exhibit W-1 is appointment order dated 30-6-79 as daily wage employer. Exhibit W-2 is also order of appointment on daily wages Rs. 4/- per day. Exhibit W-3 is copy of appointment order dated 23-11-79. Service of workman was terminable giving one months notice. Exhibit W-4 is workman along with others were appointed on probation period. The period of probation is not mentioned in the order. Exhibit W-5 is article of charges relating to unauthorized absence of workman. Exhibit W-6 is reply given by workman[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3515 that he could not attend duties as he was suffering from illness. Exhibit W-7 is copy of order withholding increment for 3 months. Exhibit W-8 is notice dated 8-3-83 for termination of service of workman after one month. However without waiting for one month period, the order of termination was issued on 15-3-83 Exhibit W-9. In order Exhibit W-9 working days of workman is enclosed. Exhibit W-10 is order dated 15-3-83 rejecting representation of workman. Exhibit W-11 is memorandum dated 1-6-83. That matter pertaining to workman was considered with sympathy. As per Exhibit W-2, workman was informed, his services were terminated for unauthorized absence. As per Exhibit W-13, the representation of workman was rejected as per Exhibit W-14, appeal of workman was dismissed. Exhibit W-15 is copy of notice issued by ALC. Exhibit W-16 is reply given by IInd party.
12. The documents on record establish the fact that the workman was appointed on a temporary post which was likely to continue and on temporary basis. The office order dated 30-11-1979, Exhibit W-4 shows that the period of probation was one year. Hence, the fact is established that the initial appointment of the workman was on temporary basis, on a temporary post, which was likely to continue and the period of probation provided was one year. It is the case of employers that since the services of the workman were regulated by CCS (T.S.)Rules 1965 because workman was not made permanent hence his services could be dispensed with after giving one month notice of salary as provided in Rule 5(1) whereas the case of workman is that since he had completed more than 4 years in service, he would be deemed to have been regularized and Central Civil Services Classification Control and Appeal Rules 1965 will apply in his case. Workman further submits that before termination, a charge sheet under Rule 14 of the C.C.S.(C.C.A.)Rules 1965 was issued to him and after enquiry, punishment was granted to him. This fact is not disputed by management rather management also admits this fact of issuing charge sheet under Rule 14 of C.C.S. (CCA) Rules 1965 and awarding punishment after enquiry. This fact is further supported by documentary evidence, charge sheet dated 13-7-1982 (Exhibit W-4) and punishment which is Exhibit W-7. It has been submitted from the side of workman that since once charge sheet was issued against the workman in CCS(CCA)Rules 1965- Rule-14, it implies that he was treated as a permanent employee and thus his services could not be terminated under Rule-5 of CCS(TS ) Rules of 1965.
13. Rule-3 of CCS(CCA)Rules 1965 reads as under:-
"These rules shall apply to every Government servant including every civilian Government servant in the Defence Services, but shall not apply to –
(a) any railway servant, as defined in Rule 102 of Volume I of the Indian Railways Establishment Code,
(b) any member of the All India Services,
(c) any person in casual employment,
(d) any person subject to discharge from service on less than one month's notice,
(e) any person for whom special provision is made, in respect of matters covered by these rules, by or under any law for the time being in force or by or under any agreement entered into by or with the previous approval of the President before or after the commencement of these rules, in regard to matters covered by such special provisions.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), the President may by order exclude any Group of Government servants from the operation of all or any of these rules.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), or the Indian Railways Establishment Code, these rules shall apply to every Government servant temporarily transferred to a Service or post coming within Exception (a) or (e) in sub-rule (1), to whom, but for such transfer, these rules would apply.
(4) If any doubt arises, - (a) whether these rules or any of them apply to any person, or (b) whether any person to whom these rules apply belongs a particular Service, the matter shall be referred to the President, who shall decide the same."
14. Rule 12 of C.C.S.(C.C.A.)Rules 1965 provides for penalties which reads as under:-
"(1) The President may impose any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 on any Government servant.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-rule (1), but subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4), any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 may be imposed on –
(a) a member of a Central Civil Service other than the General Central Service, by the appointing authority or the authority specified in the schedule in this behalf or by any other authority empowered in this behalf by a general or special order of the President;
(b) a person appointed to a Central Civil Post included in the General Central Service, by the authority specified in this behalf by a general or special order of the President or, where no such order has been made, by the3516 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] appointing authority or the authority specified in the Schedule in this behalf. Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 11
(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4), the power to impose any of the penalties specified in Rule 11 may also be exercised, in the case of a member of a Central Civil Services, Group 'C' (other than the Central Secretariat Clerical Service), or a Central Civil Service, Group 'D' ,- (a) if he is serving in a Ministry or Department of the Government of India, by the Secretary to the Government of India in that Ministry or Department, or (b)if he is serving in any office, by the head of that office, except where the head of that office is lower in rank than the authority competent to impose the penalty under sub-rule (2).
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule – (a) except where the penalty specified in clause (v) or clause (vi) of Rule 11 is imposed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General on a member of the Indian Audit and Accounts Service, no penalty specified in clause (v) to (ix) of that rule shall be imposed by any authority subordinate to the appointing authority; (b) where a Government servant who is a member of a Service other than then General Central Service or who has been substantively appointed to any civil post in the General Central Service, is temporarily appointed to any other Service or post, the authority competent to impose on such Government servant any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall not impose any such penalties unless it has consulted such authority, not being an authority subordinate to it, as would have been competent under sub-rule (2) to impose on the Government servant any of the said penalties had he not been appointed to such other Service or post; (c) in respect of a probationer undergoing training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, the Director of the said Academy shall be the authority competent to impose on such probationer any of the penalties specified in clauses (i) and (iii) of rule 11 after observing the procedure laid down in rule 16.
15. Similarly Rule 14 also reads as under:-
Procedure for imposing major penalties (1) No order imposing any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of Rule 11 shall be made except after an inquiry held, as far as may be, in the manner provided in this rule and rule 15, or in the manner provided by the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850 (37 of 1850), where such inquiry is held under that Act.
(2) Whenever the disciplinary authority is of the opinion that there are grounds for inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour against a Government servant, it may itself inquire into, or appoint under this rule or under the provisions of the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850, as the case may be, an authority to inquire into the truth thereof. Provided that where there is a complaint of sexual harassment within the meaning of rule 3 C of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, the Complaints Committee established in each Ministry or Department or Office for inquiring into such complaints, shall be deemed to be the inquiring authority appointed by the disciplinary authority for the purpose of these rules and the Complaints Committee shall hold, if separate procedure has not been prescribed for the Complaints Committee for holding the inquiry into the complaints of sexual harassment, the inquiry as far as practicable in accordance with the procedure laid down in these rules. Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 13
Explanation.— (i) Where the disciplinary authority itself holds the inquiry, any reference in sub-rule (7) to sub-rule (20) and in sub-rule (22) to the inquiring authority shall be construed as a reference to the disciplinary authority. (ii) Where the disciplinary authority appoints a retired Government servant as inquiring authority, any reference in sub-rule (7) to subrule (20) and in sub-rule (22) shall include such authority.
(3) Where it is proposed to hold an inquiry against a Government servant under this rule and rule 15, the disciplinary authority shall draw up or cause to be drawn up- (i) the substance of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior into definite and distinct articles of charge; (ii) a statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior in support of each article of charge, which shall contain- (a) a statement of all relevant facts including any admission or confession made by the Government servant; (b) a list of documents by which, and a list of witnesses by whom, the articles of charge are proposed to be sustained.
(4) (a) The Disciplinary Authority shall deliver or cause to be delivered to the Government servant a copy of the articles of charge, the statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior and a list of documents and witnesses by which each article or charges is proposed to be sustained. (b) On receipt of the articles of charge, the Government servant shall be required to submit his written statement of defense, if he so desires, and also state whether he desires to be heard in person, within a period of fifteen days, which may be further extended for a period not exceeding fifteen days at a time for reasons to be recorded in writing by the Disciplinary Authority or any other Authority authorized by the Disciplinary Authority on his behalf: Provided that under no circumstances, the extension of time for filing written statement of defense shall exceed forty-five days from the date of receipt of articles of charge.
(5) (a) On receipt of the written statement of defense, the disciplinary authority may itself inquire into such of the articles of charge as are not Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3517 14 admitted, or, if it considers it necessary so to do, appoint, under sub-rule (2), an inquiring authority for the purpose, and where all the articles of charge have been admitted by the Government servant in his written statement of defence, the disciplinary authority shall record its findings on each charge after taking such evidence as it may think fit and shall act in the manner laid down in rule 15. (b) If no written statement of defense is submitted by the Government servant, the disciplinary authority may itself inquire into the articles of charge, or may, if it considers it necessary to do so, appoint, under sub rule (2), an inquiring authority for the purpose. (c) Where the disciplinary authority itself inquires into any article of charge or appoints an inquiring authority for holding an inquiry into such charge, it may, by an order, appoint a Government servant or a legal practitioner, to be known as the "Presenting Officer" to present on its behalf the case in support of the articles of charge.
Explanation- For the purposes of this rule, the expression 'Government servant' includes a person who has ceased to be in Government service.
(6) The disciplinary authority shall, where it is not the inquiring authority, forward to the inquiring authority- (i) a copy of the articles of charge and the statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior; (ii) a copy of the written statement of the defense, if any, submitted by the Government servant; (iii) a copy of the statements of witnesses, if any, referred to in sub-rule (3); (iv) evidence proving the delivery of the documents referred to in sub-rule (3) to the Government servant; and (v) a copy of the order appointing the "Presenting Officer".
(7) The Government servant shall appear in person before the inquiring authority on such day and at such time within ten working days from the date of receipt by the inquiring authority of the articles of charge and the statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior, as the inquiring authority may, by notice in writing, specify, in this behalf, or within such further time, not exceeding ten days, as the inquiring authority may allow.
(8) (a) The Government servant may take the assistance of any other Government servant posted in any office either at his headquarters or at the place where the inquiry is held, to present the case on his behalf, but Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 15 may not engage a legal practitioner for the purpose, unless the Presenting Officer appointed by the disciplinary authority is a legal practitioner, or, the disciplinary authority, having regard to the circumstances of the case, so permits; Provided that the Government servant may take the assistance of any other Government servant posted at any other station, if the inquiring authority having regard to the circumstances of the case, and for reasons to be recorded in writing, so permits. Note : The Government servant shall not take the assistance of any other Government servant who has three pending disciplinary cases on hand in which he has to give assistance. (b) The Government servant may also take the assistance of a retired Government servant to present the case on his behalf, subject to such conditions as may be specified by the President from time to time by general or special order in this behalf.
(9) If the Government servant who has not admitted any of the articles of charge in his written statement of defense or has not submitted any written statement of defense, appears before the inquiring authority, such authority shall ask him whether he is guilty or has any defense to make and if he pleads guilty to any of the articles of charge, the inquiring authority shall record the plea, sign the record and obtain the signature of the Government servant thereon.
(10) The inquiring authority shall return a finding of guilt in respect of those articles of charge to which the government servant pleads guilty.
(11) The inquiring authority shall, if the Government servant fails to appear within the specified time or refuses or omits to plead, require the Presenting Officer to produce the evidence by which he proposes to prove the articles of charge, and shall adjourn the case to a later date not exceeding thirty days, after recording an order that the Government servant may, for the purpose of preparing his defense: (i) inspect within five days of the order Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 16 rule (3), the inquiring authority shall furnish him with such copies as early as possible and in any case not later than three days before the commencement of the examination of the witnesses on behalf of the disciplinary authority. (iii) give a notice within ten days of the order or within such further time not exceeding ten days as the inquiring authority may allow, for the discovery or production of any documents which are in the possession of Government but not mentioned in the list referred to in sub-rule (3). NOTE.- The Government servant shall indicate the relevance of the documents required by him to be discovered or produced by the Government.
(12) The inquiring authority shall, on receipt of the notice for the discovery or production of documents, forward the same or copies thereof to the authority in whose custody or possession the documents are kept, with a requisition for the production of the documents by such date as may be specified in such requisition: Provided that the inquiring authority may, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, refuse to requisition such of the documents as are, in its opinion, not relevant to the case.
3518 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](13) On receipt of the requisition referred to in sub-rule (12), every authority having the custody or possession of the requisitioned documents shall produce the same or issue a non-availability certificate before the Inquiring Authority within one month of the receipt of such requisition: Provided that if the authority having the custody or possession of the requisitioned documents is satisfied for reasons to be recorded by it in writing that the production of all or any of such documents would be against the public interest or security of the State, it shall inform the Inquiring Authority accordingly and the Inquiring Authority shall, on being so informed, communicate the information to the Government servant and withdraw the requisition made by it for the production or discovery of such documents.
(14) On the date fixed for the inquiry, the oral and documentary evidence by which the articles of charge are proposed to be proved shall be produced by or on behalf of the disciplinary authority. The witnesses shall be examined by or on behalf of the Presenting Officer and may be cross-examined by or on behalf of the Government servant. The Presenting Officer shall be entitled to reexamine the witnesses on any points on which they have been cross-examined, but not on any new matter, without the leave of the inquiring authority. The inquiring authority may also put such questions to the witnesses as it thinks fit. Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 17
(15) If it shall appear necessary before the close of the case on behalf of the disciplinary authority, the inquiring authority may, in its discretion, allow the Presenting Officer to produce evidence not included in the list given to the Government servant or may itself call for new evidence or recall and re-examine any witness and in such case the Government servant shall be entitled to have, if he demands it, a copy of the list of further evidence proposed to be produced and an adjournment of the inquiry for three clear days before the production of such new evidence, exclusive of the day of adjournment and the day to which the inquiry is adjourned. The inquiring authority shall give the Government servant an opportunity of inspecting such documents before they are taken on the record. The inquiring authority may also allow the Government servant to produce new evidence, if it is of the opinion that the production of such evidence is necessary, in the interests of justice. NOTE.- New evidence shall not be permitted or called for or any witness shall not be recalled to fill up any gap in the evidence. Such evidence may be called for only when there is an inherent lacuna or defect in the evidence which has been produced originally.
(16) When the case for the disciplinary authority is closed, the Government servant shall be required to state his defense, orally or in writing, as he may prefer. If the defense is made orally, it shall be recorded and the Government servant shall be required to sign the record. In either case, a copy of the statement of defense shall be given to the Presenting Officer, if any, appointed.
(17) The evidence on behalf of the Government servant shall then be produced. The Government servant may examine himself in his own behalf if he so prefers. The witnesses produced by the Government servant shall then be examined and shall be liable to cross-examination, re-examination and examination by the inquiring authority according to the provisions applicable to the witnesses for the disciplinary authority.
(18) The inquiring authority may, after the Government servant closes his case, and shall, if the Government servant has not examined himself, generally question him on the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence for the purpose of enabling the Government servant to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him.
(19) The inquiring authority may, after the completion of the production of evidence, hear the Presenting Officer, if any, appointed, and the Government servant, or permit them to file written briefs of their respective case, if they so desire.
(20) If the Government servant to whom a copy of the articles of charge has been delivered, does not submit the written statement of defence on or before Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 18 the date specified for the purpose or does not appear in person before the inquiring authority or otherwise fails or refuses to comply with the provisions of this rule, the inquiring authority may hold the inquiry ex parte.
(21) (a) Where a disciplinary authority competent to impose any of the penalties specified in clause (i) to (iv) of rule 11 (but not competent to impose any of the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of rule 11), has itself inquired into or caused to be inquired into the articles of any charge and that authority, having regard to its own findings or having regard to its decision on any of the findings of any inquiring authority appointed by it, is of the opinion that the penalties specified in clauses (v) to (ix) of rule 11 should be imposed on the Government servant, that authority shall forward the records of the inquiry to such disciplinary authority as is competent to impose the last mentioned penalties. (b) The disciplinary authority to which the records are so forwarded may act on the evidence on the record or may, if it is of the opinion that further examination of any of the witnesses is necessary in the interests of justice, recall the witness and examine, cross-examine and re-examine the witness and may impose on the Government servant such penalty as it may deem fit in accordance with these rules.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3519(22) Whenever any inquiring authority, after having heard and recorded the whole or any part of the evidence in an inquiry ceases to exercise jurisdiction therein, and is succeeded by another inquiring authority which has, and which exercises, such jurisdiction, the inquiring authority so succeeding may act on the evidence so recorded by its predecessor, or partly recorded by its predecessor and partly recorded by itself: Provided that if the succeeding inquiring authority is of the opinion that further examination of any of the witnesses whose evidence has already been recorded is necessary in the interests of justice, it may recall, examine, cross-examine and re- examine any such witnesses as hereinbefore provided.
(23) (i) After the conclusion of the inquiry, a report shall be prepared and it shall contain- (a) the articles of charge and the statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour; (b) the defence of the Government servant in respect of each article of charge; (c) an assessment of the evidence in respect of each article of charge; (d) the findings on each article of charge and the reasons therefor. Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 19 EXPLANATION- If in the opinion of the inquiring authority the proceedings of the inquiry establish any article of charge different from the original articles of the charge, it may record its findings on such article of charge: Provided that the findings on such article of charge shall not be recorded unless the Government servant has either admitted the facts on which such article of charge is based or has had a reasonable opportunity of defending himself against such article of charge. (ii) The inquiring authority, where it is not itself the disciplinary authority, shall forward to the disciplinary authority the records of inquiry which shall include :- (a) the report prepared by it under clause (i); (b) the written statement of defense, if any, submitted by the Government servant; (c) the oral and documentary evidence produced in the course of the inquiry; (d) written briefs, if any, filed by the Presenting Officer or the Government servant or both during the course of the inquiry; and (e) the orders, if any, made by the disciplinary authority and the inquiring authority in regard to the inquiry.
24 (a) The Inquiring Authority should conclude the inquiry and submit his report within a period of six months from the date of receipt of order of his appointment as Inquiring Authority. (b) Where it is not possible to adhere to the time limit specified in clause (a), the Inquiring Authority may record the reasons and seek extension of time from the disciplinary authority in writing, who may allow an additional time not exceeding six months for completion of the Inquiry, at a time. (c) The extension for a period not exceeding six months at a time may be allowed for any good and sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing by the Disciplinary Authority or any other Authority authorized by the Disciplinary Authority on his behalf.
16. Reference of Rule 5(1) CCS(T.S.)Rules 1965 is also necessary here which reads as under:-
"(a)The services of a temporary Government Servant shall be liable to termination at any time by a notice in writing given either by the Government Servant to the appointing authority or by the appointing authority to the Government servant,
(b) the period of such notice shall be one month."
Perusal of these rules shows that the CCS(CCA)Rules 1965 will apply to temporary and permanent Government servants equally as there is no provision to show that it will apply only to permanent employees or regular employees hence the contention of workman side that since once departmental charge sheet was issued to workman under Rule 14 of CCS(CCA)Rules 1965, he shall be deemed to be a permanent employee is untenable. There is nothing on record to show that any order regarding regularization of services of the workman was made by employers at any point of time. This also requires to be mentioned here that the post on which workman was initially appointed was of temporary nature which was likely to continue meaning thereby it was not a permanent post. Rule-5(1) of C.C.S(T.S.) rules as mentioned above does not make any distinction between a probationer Government Servant and a temporary Government servant who has completed his probation meaning thereby it will apply equally to a probationer well as a Government Servant who is on temporary appointment though he has completed his period of probation hence in the light of above discussion, the argument of the learned counsel for workman is that termination of his services under Rule 5(1) of CCS(TS)Rules 1965 was not legally justified has no leg to stand and it is not accepted. As this rule provides services of temporary Government servant could be terminated after one month notice which has been done in the case in hand. hence the termination of services of workman in the case in hand cannot be held against law or procedure. Accordingly it is held that the action of management of BNP Dewas in terminating the services of Ram Chandra Bohre (deceased) w.e.f. 15-3-85 is justified in law.
Point for determination No.1 is answered accordingly.
17. Point for determination No. 2
Learned counsel for workman produced citations in case of Pradip Kumar versus Union of India reported
in AIR-SCW-2013-295, Ishwar Dayal Khaskalam versus Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation
through its Divisional Manager in WP No. 17405/2016, Y.Yohannan versus State of MP and others
reported in 2008(2)MPHT.226(DB) and Union of India versus Shri Ram Khiladi and another in WP No.
2913/2001.
3520 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]In the light of findings on Point No.1, when the termination has been found justified in law these referred cases do not help workman in the case in hand and the workman is not entitled to any relief.
Point for determination No. 2 is answered accordingly.
18. In the result, award is passed as under:-
(1) The action of the management of General Manager, Bank Note Press, Dewas in terminating the services of Shri Ramchandra Bohare w.e.f. 15-3-83 is proper and legal.
(2) Workman is not entitled to any relief.
Dated:1-4-2019
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-814.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eSustesaV lsaVªy dkWVst bafMLVªht vkWQ bafM;k] dksydkrk vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] dksydkrk ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 12@2015) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 29-04-2019 dks izkIr g, FksA
[la- ,y-&42011@10@2015&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.814.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 12/2015) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Kolkata now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Management Central Cottage Industries of India, Kolkata & Others, and their workmen which was received by the Central Government on 12.03-2019.
[No. L-42011/10/2015–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Reference No. 12 of 2015
Parties : Employers in relation to the management of the Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India
AND
Their workmen
Present : Justice Ravindra Nath Mishra, Presiding Officer
Appearance:
On behalf of the : None Management .
On behalf of the : None Workmen
Dated: 22nd April, 2019. Industry: Warehousing
AWARD
By Order No.L-42011/10/2015-IR(DU) dated 05.03.2015 the Government of India, Ministry of Labour in exercise of its powers under Section 10(1)(d) and (2A) referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3521"Whether the action of Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd., Government of India undertaking, Ministry of Textiles, Kolkata in denying the wages at par with the rate of minimum wages notified and revised from time to time by the Central Government to the 10(ten) number of contract workers deployed in their premises by M/s. Nobel Security Services is justified? If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to?"
2. In this reference case the union and the Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India previously entered appearance through their respective learned counsel, but M/s. Nobel Security Service never appeared despite service of notice. Union filed its statement of claim, list of documents along with photo copies of documents and list of witness, but Central Cottage Industries Corporation did not file its written statement inspite of sufficient opportunity. But the union, as it transpires from record, remained absent since 03.10.2018. The union, however, inspite of sufficient opportunity has not led any evidence to substantiate its case.
3. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the union has no grievance at present in respect of denial of wages at par with the rate of minimum wages notified and revised from time to time by the Central Government to the concerned workmen deployed in the premises of Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India by M/s. Nobel Security Service as mentioned in the order of reference. Therefore, there exists no dispute for adjudication.
5. Therefore, the reference is disposed of accordingly.
JUSTICE RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA, Presiding Officer
Dated, Kolkata, The 22nd April, 2019
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-815.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
esllZ lhfu;j v/kh{kd (Mkd?kj)] jk;iqj vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lc) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 70@2007] 71@2007] 72@2007] 73@2007] 74@2007] 75@2007) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 23-04-2019 dks izkIr g, FksA
[la- ,y&40012@30@2007&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.815.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 70/2007, 71/2007, 72/2007, 73/2007, 74/2007, 75/2007) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Sr. Superintendent (Post Office), Raipur and Others and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 23.04.2019.
[No. L-40012/30/2007–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR-COURT, JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/70/2007
Sri Rakesh Kumar Sarthi, S/o Santu Singh Sarthi, Mahadeo Nagar, New Changora Bhaga, PO Sunder Nagar, Raipur (CG) …Workman
Versus
Sr. Superintendent (Post Office), Raipur
Sr. Post Master, Raipur …Management3522 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
No. CGIT/LC/R/71/2007
Shri Om Prakash Sahu, S/o Shri Kalaram Sahu, Near Shri Shakti Durga Mata Mandir, Jorapara, Raipur …Workman
Versus
Sr. Superintendent (Post Office), Raipur Sr. Post Master,
Raipur …Management
No. CGIT/LC/R/72/2007
Shri Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar, C/o Mona Falli Factory, Naya Talab, Gudhiyari, Raipur (CG) …Workman
Versus
Sr. Superintendent(Post Office), Raipur Sr. Post Master, Raipur …Management
No. CGIT/LC/R/73/2007
Smt. Monika Nirmalkar, Yogendra Nirmalkar & Aditi Nirmalkar, LRs of Late Shri Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar, In front of Shri Ramesh Thakur's house, Adarsh Nagar, Kushalpur, Raipur (CG) …Workman/LRs
Versus
Sr. Superintendent(Post Office), Raipur Sr. Post Master, Raipur …Management
No. CGIT/LC/R/74/2007
Shri Vishnu Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri R.L.Yadav, Danteshwar Chowk, Gopiya Para, Purani Basti, Raipur (CG) …Workman
Versus
Sr. Superintendent(Post Office), Raipur Sr. Post Master, Raipur …Management
No. CGIT/LC/R/75/2007
Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu C/o Shri Manik Ram Sahu, Paras Nagar (Devendra Nagar), Raipur (CG) …Workman
Versus
Sr. Superintendent(Post Office), Raipur Sr. Post Master, Raipur …Management[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3523
AWARD
Passed on this 11th day of April, 2019
1. (a) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-40012/30/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Rakesh Kumar Sarthi w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
(b) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-40012/33/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
" Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Om Prakash Sahu w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
(c) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-40012/32/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
" Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
(d) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-40012/31/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
" Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
(e) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L-40012/35/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
" Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Vishnu Kumar Yadav w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
(f) As per letter dated 23-7-2007 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No. L-40012/34/2007-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
" Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workman Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu w.e.f. 14-7-04 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
2. Though all these cases arisen on the basis of separate references but since the subject matter was common and the facts as well as evidence involved was also common, hence these cases are being disposed by one common award.
3. After receiving reference, notices were issued to the parties in all the cases. Both parties filed their statement of claim and written statement of defense. According to statement of claim of the workmen, workman in R/75/07, 74/07 & 72/07 were engaged in 1994 as substitute labor by the employer. They were permitted to work continuously on temporary basis, were initially paid wages @ Rs.158/- per day which was the pay of regular Group "D" staff but their pay was reduced by the employers from May 2004. They agitated against this. annoyed with the protest, the employers terminated their services without giving any show cause notice or opportunity from 14-7-04. The workman had been continuously serving the department since 1994 till their date of disengagement which is 17-7-04. Thus, acquired status of permanent employment as mentioned under Section 25-B of ID Act. Their disengagement is in violation of Section 25-F of ID Act because they had completed 240 days in engagement of employers in the year preceding the date of their disengagement. It was also alleged that their disengagement is further violative of Section 25-G of ID Act. Accordingly, their disengagement is against law, arbitrary, unjust and unreasonable which is liable to be set-aside.
4. In R/81/2007, the case of workman is that he was first engaged in the year 1993 and rest of the pleadings are same as mentioned above. In Case R/73/07, R/71/07 & R/70/07, case of workmen is that they were first engaged on 8-5-983524 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] and rest of the pleadings are exactly the same as mentioned earlier in case of other workmen. Thus the only difference in the cases of the workmen is first date of their engagement and rest of the pleadings as well relief are exactly the same.
5. Though separate Written Statements have been filed by the employers but grounds taken are same. It has been pleaded by employers that the workmen were engaged on daily basis subject to emergency and availability of work and need of service. When there was work, they were allowed to work for that day and they were paid wages at the end of that day's work. Also, it was pleaded that the workmen never rendered continuous service of 240 days in any given year hence provisions of Section 25-F of ID Act are not attracted in their cases therefore they are not entitled to any compensation. The employers further submitted that the disengagement of the workman on 14-7-04 was factually and legally correct because the workmen were never issued any appointment order w.r.t. any regular post and/ or regular basis nor terminated from any post of management hence the question of illegal termination did not arise. The employers specifically denied that the workmen were earlier being paid @ Rs.158/- per day which was reduced to Rs.79/- per day and pleaded that if at all the workmen had rendered in service for the management, they were engaged on daily basis subject to availability of work and need of service and were paid the wages at the end of the day or next day. If at all the work was available on the next day, it was provided to the workman otherwise they were told about non-availability of work. The workmen could not have been said to have acquired status of permanent employee as per Section 25 B of ID Act and since they are not entitled to benefit of Section 25-F because they were engaged and were paid on daily basis subject to availability of work. There was no question of violation of Section 25-F or 25-G of ID Act. It was further pleaded that the workman did not render continuous service of 240 days in the year preceding the date of disengagement. Accordingly, it was prayed that the reference be decided against the workman.
6. No rejoinder was filed by any of the workman in these cases. Photocopy regarding election duty and copy of attendance register filed in every case were proved and Marked Exhibit W-1 & W-2 respectively. Workmen examined themselves separately in each of the cases. One other witness Shri D.N.Verma an employee of the department was also examined by workmen in each of the cases as witness of workmen.
7. Employers examined on oath witness Shri P.N. Lahare and Shri Y.R. Sinha separately in every case. Witness Shri P.K.Lahare was not produced for cross-examination in any of these cases.
8. I have heard argument of Ld. Advocate Vijay Tripathi for the workman and Shri S.K.Mishra for the employers and have perused the record.
9. Perusal of record in the light of rival argument reveals that following points for determination arise in the case in hand:-
(1) Whether the action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in terminating the services of their workmen Shri Rakesh Kumar Sarthi, Shri Om Prakash Sahu, Shri Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar, Shri Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar Shri Vishnu Kumar Yadav and Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu 14-7-04 is legal and justified?
(2) If not, to what relief, the workmen are entitled to?"
10. Point for Determination No.1-
Before entering into evidence, it is necessary to refer Section 2(oo), 2(s), 25(b), 25(f) and 25(g) of I.D.Act, 1947 which is as under:-
" Section 2(oo)- "retrenchment" means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include- (a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or (b) retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf; or
3[(bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the on-renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and
the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in that behalf contained therein; or] (c) termination of the service of a workman on the ground of continued ill-health;
Section 2(S)-
"workman" means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute, includes any such person who has been dismissed, discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3525 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, or (iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity, or
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (iv) who, being employed in a supervisory capacity, draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or exercises, either by the nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.
Section 25-B-
Definition of continuous service.- For the purposes of this Chapter,-- (1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock- out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman; (2) where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer- (a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case; (b) for a period of six months, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) ninety-five days, in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) one hundred and twenty days, in any other case. Explanation.- For the purpose of clause (2), the number of days on which a workman has actually worked under an employer shall include the days on which- (i) he has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (20 of 1946), or under this Act or under any other law applicable to the industrial establishment; (ii) he has been on leave with full wages, earned in the previous year; (iii) he has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; and in the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave; so, however, that the total period of such maternity leave does not exceed twelve weeks.
Section 25 (G)-
Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until-
(a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating thereasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice:
(b) the workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completedyear of continuous service] or any part thereof in excess of six months; and
(c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate Government 3[or such authority as may be specified by the appropriate Government by notification in the Official Gazette.
11. The pleadings of the parties on this point has been elaborated earlier. Workman in these cases except R/81/07 have filed and proved attendance cum bills registers January 2003 to December 2003 which is Exhibit W-2 in all the cases. What is to be seen is whether from the evidence on record, it is proved that the workman or any of the workmen have worked for a period of 240 days on the date preceding their dis-engagement which is 14-7-2004 by these attendance sheets cum vouchers the relevant vouchers with regard to each of the workmen is being produced in following chart-
| Sl.No. | Case No. | Name of workman | Vouchers/Attendance sheet | Date of attendance |
| 1. | R/70/07 | Rakesh Kumar Sarthi | July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 December 2003 | 24 days 27 days 26 days 25 days |
| 2. | R/71/07 | Om Prakash Sahu | July 2013 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January to June 2004 | 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days 30 days each |
| 3. | R/72/07 | Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar | July 2013 August 2003 September 2003 November 2003 December 2003 | 28 days 26 days 28 days 26 days 25 days |
| 4. | R/73/07 | Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar | July 2013 August 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 | 23 days 21 days 26 days 21 days 26 days |
| 5. | R/74/07 | Vishnu Kumar Yadav | July 2013 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 | 23 days 19 days 26 days 25 days 23 days 26 days |
| 6. | R/75/07 | Santosh Kumar Sahu | July 2013 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 | 27 days 26 days 26 days 25 days 23 days 25 days |
12. The workman of these cases have supported their allegations in their statements on oath their claim on the point that they were engaged by the department since the year as mentioned in their statement of claims and had worked regularly for 240 days in the year preceding the date of their disengagement. This statement is partly corroborated by the documents as mentioned above, which have been filed and proved by the workman in these cases. Management witness has denied this claim of the workman that they completed 240 days in a regular engagement of the employers in the year preceding date of their disengagement. The workman side has examined on oath one Deenanath Verma, who happens to be an employee of the employers working as Manager with the department. He has stated that he has seen the workman working right from the date as mentioned in their statement of claims till date of their disengagement which is 14-7-04 and have been paid wages for this. this witness further stated that he has himself seen this workman working because he was also working in the same office. In his cross-examination, this witness has said that he has not seen any document regarding dis-engagement of these workmen and has denied that he did not witness any of these workmen working with the department, signing the attendance register and receiving wages. He further stated that the wages were paid to these workmen in his presence. This witness is an employee of the department which is employer of the workmen. There is nothing in his statement to disbelieve him on this point. This is also worth mentioning here that the workmen had filed an application in these cases directing the employer department to file the attendance sheet and payment sheets for the period of 1998 till date of disengagement i.e. 14-7-04. This application was heard and was dismissed by my Learned predecessor vide his order dated 4-9-2014 on the ground that it was submitted by the employer learned counsel that these documents were not available with the department. These workmen were permitted to lead secondary evidence regarding these documents. Now the situation which comes out is that workmen has filed some of the attendance sheets and payment which relates to their presence with the department and working and payment of wages to them as mentioned above in the chart in this judgment. These documents are photocopy of documents maintained in the office of employers. What may be the source of workman getting these documents but this fact is established that documents regarding presence and payment of the workmen for the period of their engagement have been maintained by the employer department hence it can be safely held that the employers have knowingly withheld the complete set of documents which were required to be produced by them in helping this court to reach on the conclusion on the fact whether the workman had rendered regular service with the employers for a period of 240 days preceding year of his disengagement. Hence it will be legal for this court to draw an adverse inference against the employer management and the Court has reason to presume that since these documents were with-held by the employer department, it would have established the case of workmen regarding their presence had these documents been produced before this Court. It will be proper to reproduce Section-114(G) of Indian Evidence Act 1872 which reads as under-
"That evidence which, could be and is not produced would, if produced, be unfavorable to the person who with holds it"
13. Now it is established from the comparative study of evidence in form of documents and oral statements filed by both the sides that all the workmen had stated on oath that they had completed 240 days in a regular engagement of employers in the year preceding the date of their dis-engagement. Their this statement is supported by oral testimony of other witness D.N.Verma, who is an employee of the employer department and is further partly supported by the documents in form of attendance cum payment sheets whereas the management side witness has simply made a selfserving statement that there are no such documents and that none of the workmen completed 240 days in[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3527 engagement in the year preceding date of their disengagement. Hence it can be safely concluded that in the case in hand, workmen have discharged the initial burden of proving their engagement of 240 days in the year preceding date of their disengagement and it was the management who had to rebut this fact by evidence in form of documents and/or oral statement since the documents in this respect have been proved to have been withheld by the management. hence adverse inference against management will be drawn and keeping this scenario in view, it is held that the case of the workman that they were engaged as daily wager/ casual labor since the date of engagement as alleged by them and they were in regular engagement of the employers as casual labor/ daily wager for a period of 240 days in the year preceding the date of their disengagement. Reference can be made of a case in case of R.M.Yellatti versus Assistant Executive Engineer reported in 2006-SCC(L&S)1 which is a 3 Judge Bench decision. In this case also, the documents regarding engagement of the workmen were withheld by the employers. Workman attempted to get the documents summoned but they were not produced hence on the oral statement of the workman, the Apex Court held that the workman had discharged successfully his burden that he had been in engagement of employers for a period of 240 days in the year preceding date of his termination/dis-engagement. The facts of the referred case are similar to the case in hand.
14. Learned counsel for employers has referred to case Mohd Ali versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in AIR-2018-SC-2194 but the facts of the referred case are different from the case in hand because in the referred case, workman could not prove his engagement of 240 days in the year preceding the date of his termination.
Keeping the proved facts as mentioned above, in the light of provisions of law referred to above and settled preposition of law, it is held accordingly that the disengagement of the workmen by the management of Sr. Superintendent (Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur terminating their services w.e.f. 14-7-04 is not justified in law and is illegal.
Point No.1 is answered accordingly.
15. Point for Determination No.2
It has been submitted by learned counsel for workmen that in case if disengagement is against law, workmen are entitled to be reinstated with backwages. Learned counsel for employers has submitted that these workmen were daily wagers. They were not appointed against a regular vacancy or a permanent post. Their services were taken with regard to extra work. They were not appointed on regular basis. There is nothing on record that any such posts exists with the employers hence the reinstatement of workmen will not meet the ends of justice rather it will create extra financial burden and hardship on employers. He further submits that in such a case, workman may be compensated. Learned counsel has referred to following cases in this point-
(1) Shrawan Kumar Chaurasia versus Chief Municipal Officer reported in ILR(2014)M.P.3146.
(2) Tapash Kumar Paul versus BSNL reported in (2014)15SCC-313.
(3) M/S Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd versus the employees of M/S Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd and
others reported in (1979)2SCC-80.
In the case of Tapash Kumar Paul (Supra), points to be considered while awarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement have been mentioned in Para-4 of the judgment which is reproduced as follows-
"It is no doubt true that a Court may pass an order substituting an order of reinstatement by awarding compensation but the same has to be based on justifiable grounds viz. (I) where the industry is closed; (ii) where the employee has superannuated or going to retire shortly and no period of service is left to his credit; (iii) where the workman has been rendered incapacitated to discharge the duties and cannot be reinstated and / or (iv) when he has lost confidence of the Page 3 3 -3- Management to discharge duties. What is sought to be emphasized is that there may be appropriate case on facts which may justify substituting the order of reinstatement by award of compensation, but that has to be supported by some legal and justifiable reasons indicating why the order of reinstatement should be allowed to be substituted by award of compensation.
16. Hence the settled position of law on this point comes out that reinstatement without backwages may not always be a just relief which meets the ends of justice in each and every case and in suitable circumstances, compensation may be granted to workmen instead of reinstatement. Now coming on the facts of the case in hand, it is established that the workmen were daily wage employees engaged not against any regular post. Their appointment was also not done according to rules hence awarding compensation instead of reinstatement will meet ends of justice in these cases. Keeping all the facts and circumstances of the cases in hand, lumpsum compensation of 40,000 will be just and proper.
Point for determination No.2 is answered accordingly.
17. In the result, award is passed as under:-
3528 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)](1) The action of the management of Sr. Superintendent ( Post Office) and Senior Post Master, Raipur in
terminating the services of their workmen Shri Rakesh Kumar Sarthi, Shri Om Prakash Sahu, Shri
Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar, Shri Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar Shri Vishnu Kumar Yadav and Shri
Santosh Kumar Sahu 14-7-04 is not justified in law and is illegal.
(2) The workmen Shri Rakesh Kumar Sarthi, Shri Om Prakash Sahu, Shri Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar,
Shri Devendra Kumar Nirmalkar Shri Vishnu Kumar Yadav and Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu are
entitled to compensation of Rs.40,000/- each.
Amount as per above order shall be paid to workman within 30 days from the date of notification of award. In case of default, amount shall carry 9 % interest per annum from the date of award till its realization.
P.K. SRIVASTAVA, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-816.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 (1947 dk 14) dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ ok;q vf/kdkjh deku] ok;q lsuk LVs'ku egkjktiqj] Xokfy;j vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/krarz ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] tcyiqj ds iapkV (lanHkZ la[;k 50@2001) dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 22-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
[la- ,y&14012@86@2001&vkbZ vkj (Mh;w)]
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.816.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 50/2002) of the Central Goverment Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Jabalpur now as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Air Officer Commanding Air Force Station, Maharajpur, Gwalior & Others and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 22.04.2019.
[No. L-14012/86/2001–IR (DU)]
V.K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, JABALPUR
No. CGIT/LC/R/50/2002
Mohammed Rafique Siddique, S/o Sh.Mohd.Raiees Siddique, R/o Gudi Awadhpura, Near House of M.Bharat Gurjar, Kampoo, Lashkar, Gwalior. …Workman
Versus
The Air Officer Commanding, 40 Wing, Air Force Station, Maharajpur, Gwalior …Management[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3529
AWARD
Passed on this Ist day of March 2019
1. As per letter dated 11-3-2002 by the Government of India, Ministry of Labor, New Delhi, the reference is received. The reference is made to this Tribunal under Section -10 of I.D.Act, 1947 as per Notification No.L- 14012/86/2001-IR(DU). The dispute under reference relates to:
"Whether the action of the management of Air Officer Commanding, Air Force Station, Gwalior in terminating the services of Shri Mohammed Rafique Siddique S/o Mohd.Raiees Siddique w.e.f. 7-6-99 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled for?"
2. After receiving reference, notices were sent to the parties. According to the statement of claim submitted by workman, he had been working as a Civilian Auto Electrician in M.T.Section, Air Force Station, Maharajpura, Gwalior since January 1997 to the satisfaction of his superiors. His services were terminated by a verbal order w.e.f. 7-6-99.
When he filed a representation, he was assured by the employers that he would be taken back but was never taken back in service. According to workman, he had worked regularly for a period more than 240 days in the preceding year of his date of termination hence violation of Section 25-F of Industrial Dispute Act (hereinafter referred to by word 'Act'). He served a notice through his counsel on 20-2-2000 which was not properly replied by workman though after service of notice. He was against taken on duty on 13-10-2000 but taken off duty since 13-11-2000 without any order. He raised a dispute on the basis of which the reference was sent by the Central Government. According to workman,. He is entitled to protection of Section 25-F of the Act and out of job inspite of his best efforts since the date of his termination. The workman accordingly sort a relief regarding his reinstatement along with backwages holding the action of management in terminating his services from 7-6-99 are justified.
3. In their Written Statement for defence, the employers have taken a preliminary objection that they are not a workman as defined under Section 2(S) of the Act. Also, it was pleaded that the workman was never in the employment of the respondent employer. Hence not covered under Section 2-A & Section 10 of the Act is entitled to any protection.
He was employed by Civil Contractor to carry out repair work in the technical area of Airforce. The employers also pleaded that the workman was not entitled to any relief claimed but at evidence stage, the workman filed temporary passes (Photocopy), a certificate and applications said to be sent by the workman to the employers for issuing permanent passes (Photocopies) and has proved them by way of secondary evidence in his statement on oath. It is further to mention here that the application was filed by the workman directing the employers to produce documents but the employers took a stand that since no such documents as mentioned in the application were available with them because the workman was never in their employment hence they were unable to file.
4. The employer filed statement of witness Air Commodore Neeraj Yadav VM VSM and Shri Sunil Sharma, contractor but were not produced for cross examination. Hence their statements will not be read in evidence. The employers further examined on oath its witnesses Shri Yogesh Kumar Garg, Sergeant Ashim Ganguly and Squadron Leader Deepak Ganpatrao Patil. Both the sides have filed their written arguments which are on record. At stage of oral argument, the workman did not appear. His learned counsel also did not appear. Shri S.K.Pandey appeared for employers and submitted that his written submissions may be perused and he has nothing to say more in argument.
5. After having gone through the record in the light of rival memorandum or arguments, following points come up for determination in the present case:-
1. Whether the employers are industry as defined u/s2(j) of the 'Act'?
2. Whether the workman was in the employment of the employers and had completed 240 days of
regular service within one year preceding his date of termination?
3. Whether the action of management of employers in terminating services of workman w.e.f. 7-6-
99 is justified in law?
3530 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]4. Whether the workman is entitled to any relief?
6. Point for determination No.1-
7. Reference of Case of Md.Yakub Vrs. Chief Engineer, Air Force Academy and other 1973-Lab.I.C.1436)- APHC has been made from the side of workman wherein it has been laid down that Air Force Academy project is an "Industry" within the meaning of Section 2(j) of ID Act. Furthermore, decision of another case Bangalore Water Board versus Rajappa-(1978)2-SCC-213 referred to from the side of workman supports the case of the workman that the employers are industry as defined in the Act. Hence, it is held that the employers are industry as defined u/s 2(j) of the 'Act'. Point for determination No 1 is answered accordingly.
8. Point for determination No.2 & 3-
9. Since these two points are interconnected, they are being taken together. Admitted between the parties is the fact that the workman used to work in the Airforce Station, Gwalior. Parties differ on the point as to whether he was working as an employee of the non-applicant employers or was an employee engaged by the contractors who was given work of maintenance. Workman has stated on oath that he was working as a employee of the Non-applicant employer where the witnesses from the side of employer have stated that he was an employee of the contractor who was engaged by Non-applicant employers for maintenance work and was issued passes on temporary basis, giving him license to enter into the campus for the said work. The passes have been proved by the workman which are Exhibit W-1 to 3.
Nowhere it is mentioned in the passes that the workman was the employee of the present Non-applicant employers.
These passes appear only an entry pass permitting the workman to enter inside the campus. These do not help workman on the point that he was employed by the employer Non-applicants. After this, there remains a self-serving statement on oath of workman that he was in the employment of the Non-applicant employers. There is no document in form of appointment letter, salary slips to show that he was ever appointed by the employers and was ever paid any salary or remuneration by them. Moreover, these permit passes issued for entry, which have been issued on monthly basis do not show as to on which particular dates, the workman was present in the establishment for work. Hence only a self-serving statement on oath of workman which is not supported with any appointment letter or salary slip or any other document cannot be held sufficient to prove his case that he was appointed by the employer Non-applicant and that he worked continuously for the period of 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged termination when the other side has made specific denial and has also stated on oath denying the claims. Accordingly, it is held that the allegation of the workman that he was employed by the employers and that he worked continuously for 240 days in the year preceding his date of alleged termination is not proved. Also, his allegation that he is a 'workman' as defined under Section 2(s) of the 'Act' is also held not proved and on the basis of above discussion, the workman is held not entitled to protection of Section 25-F of the Act. Point for determination No. 2 & 3 are answered accordingly.
10. Point for determination No.4-
On the basis of above discussion and finding, the workman is held not entitled to any relief. Point for determination No 4 is answered accordingly.
11. The reference is answered accordingly.
Date 01-03-2019
P. K. SRIVASTAVA Presiding Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3531
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-817.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ egkizca/kd] ,uVhihlh] flagnjh lqij FkeZy ikoj IykaV] fo'kk[kkiRrue ¼,-ih-½ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn&1 ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 7@2017½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.817.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 7/2017) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The General Manager, NTPC, Simhadri Super Thermal Power Plant, Visakhapatnam (A.P.) & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 18.04.2019.
[No. L-42011/134/2016–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan, Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 7/2017
Between:
The General Secretary, Visakhapatnam Steel mazdoor workers Union, D.No.6-B9, Near Children Hostel, Islampeta, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
…Petitioner
AND
1. The Project Manager, M/s. Unitech Machine Ltd., UM House, Plot No.35P, Sct-44, Gurgaon, Haryana – 122002.
2. The General Manager, NTPC, Simhadri Super Thermal Power Plant, Deepanjali Nagar, Parawada, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
… Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Party in person
For the Respondents : Representatives3532 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order N L- 42011/134/2016-IR(DU) dated 7.3.2017 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for adjudication to this Tribunal between the management of M/s. Unitech Machine Ltd., and their workman. The reference is,
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of management of M/s. Unitech Machine Ltd., Contractor of M/s. NTPC, Simhadri Super Thermal Power Plant, Visakhapatnam in terminating the services of Sri Dilip Kumar Yadav without complying Section 25(F) of I.D.Act, 1947 is legal and or justified? If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?"
On receipt of the reference it is numbered in this Tribunal as I.D. No. 7/2017 and notices were issued to the parties concerned.
2. The case stands posted for filing of claim statement and documents by the Petitioner Union.
3. Inspite of repeated calls, the Petitioner union did not turn up. Several opportunities have been given to the Petitioner Workman/Union to attend the court to prosecute the case. But the Petitioner workman/union failed to attend this Tribunal which clearly indicates that perhaps the dispute of the Petitioner workman/union has already been settled and the Petitioner Union has got nothing to raise any claim against the Respondent. Hence, the case of the Petitioner workman/Union is closed and a 'No dispute' award is passed.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Typed to my dictation by Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant, corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, Presiding Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent
NIL NIL
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
NIL
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-818.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ lfpo] iksLVy ikVZ Vkbe deZpkjh dY;k.k la?k] jkteqanjh gSnjkckn vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] gSnjkckn&1 ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 2@2008½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-04-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.818.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 2/2008) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Secretary,[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3533 Postal Part Time Employees Welfare Association, Rajahmudry Hyderabad and Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 18.04.2019.
[No. L-40011/31/2007–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AT
HYDERABAD
Present: Sri Muralidhar Pradhan Presiding Officer
Dated the 28th day of February, 2019
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE No. 2/2008
Between:
The Secretary, Postal Part Time Employees Welfare Association, Rajahmundry Division, C/o Head Post Office, Rajahmundry – 533 101.
…Petitioner
AND
1. Sri A.N.D. Kachari, Post Master General, D/o Post, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
2. Sri D. Sri Ramulu,
Supdt. Of Post Offices D/o Post, Visakhapatnam (A.P.)
3. Sri K.V. Prasad, Supdt. Of Post Offices, D/o Post, Rajahmundry.
4. Sri Kailash Prasad, Chif Post Master General,
D/o Post, A.P. Circle, Hyderabad. …Respondents
Appearances:
For the Petitioner : Sri William Burra, Advocate For the Respondent : Sri P. Raveender Reddy, Advocate
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour by its order No. L- 40011/ 31/ 2007- IR (DU) dated 27.12.2007 referred the following dispute under section 10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act, 1947 requiring this forum to decide the question:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the demand of the Postal Part-Time Employee's Welfare Association for regularization of services of Shri I. Krishna and 16 others, as per Annexure, is legal and justified? If yes, to what relief the workmen are entitled to?"
On receipt of the reference this Tribunal has registered and numbered the reference as I.D. No. 2/2008 and issued notices to both the workman and the management. They both appeared before the court and engaged their respective counsels with the leave of the court and consent of either party.
3534 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]2. The averments made in the claim statement in brief are as follows:
The case of the Petitioner union is that altogether17 Postal Part Time employees of the Petitioner association have been working as such in the Respondents' organization since more than 10 years with meagre salaries, less than the minimum of the pay scale of the group D Central Government employees. These postal part time employees are working for more than 8 hours per day and in case of watchmen they have been working 16 hours per day. Inspite of this situation prevalent in the postal Department, employees are categorised as part time employees. The Petitioner association further submitted that the so called part time employees are working regularly without any break for the past more than 10 years, for more than 8 hours proceeding day. Hence, the employees are deemed to be in full time employment as per the provisions of various labour laws. The Respondents, with a view to exploit the cheap labour available in the market, have shown in their records that the employees are categorized as part-time employees, indicating that the said employees are categorized as part time employees, indicating that the said employees are working for less hours ranging between 3-5 hours per day, but actually the employees are working for more than 8 hours to 10 hours per day. It is stated that as per the previsions contained in various labour enactments, if the casual labour works for less than 4 ½ hours per day, the said casual labour is deemed to be a part time casual labour. The categorization of the 17 employees mentioned to the annexure attached to the reference are full time employees. It is also submitted that the technical staff such as electrician, wireman etc., and the respective helpers cannot be treated as part time employees, since the nature of work is such that they have to work for more than 8-10 hours per day. It is also submitted that the Petitioner's employees working as watchman are employed for more than 16 hours per day and as such they cannot be treated as "Postal Part Time Employees". It is further submitted that there are no employees of the association working less than 8 hours per day. The Respondent Management which is the central government Department ought to have been the model employer but unfortunately the Respondents' organization the largest exploiting Management. There is ample proof to show that the employees of the Petitioner association has a strong case to succeed. Therefore, these Petitioners submitted that the Respondents' Management had admitted that employees of the Petitioner association are working since more than 10 years. The Respondents' Management also admitted that there are technical employees as well as watchman. But the Respondents' contention is that the hours of work is less than 5 hours per day which they cannot prove at all. The Petitioners submitted that from the nature of duties performed as well as their length of service in the Department would make them eligible for regularization in the Department. The Petitioner association further submitted that the so called part time employees are working for more than 8-16 hours a day. For instance the night watchman reports for duty at 4 pm and will be relieved from duty at 8 am in the next day morning, resulting in his employment for 16 hours. The wireman/electrician reports for duty at 9.15 am and can leave only after 5.45 pm resulting in 8 hours, general shift with ½ hours lunch interval. They also work for more hours in emergencies. Similarly the workmen engaged in the postal dispensary report to duty at 7 am and work upto 3 pm continuously resulting in 8 hours shift and water carrier etc., also report for duty at 7 am and relieved from day's works at 5.45 pm involving 10.45 hours working. But ignoring the above factual position and the practices prevalent the Respondents are suppressing the facts and recording in their books as if the Petitioner's employees are work upto 3-5 hours per day and marking them or categorizing them as "Postal Part Time Employees". From any point of view the employees of Petitioner's association deserve better treatment and thereby they are entitled for regularization. It is further stated that the Hon'ble Apex Court in a decision reported in AIR 1987 SC 2342 Daily Rated Casual labour employed under P & T Department though Bhaaratiya Dak Tar Mazdoor Much (Vs.) Union of India & Others has categorically held that denial of minimum pay in pay scales of regularly employed workmen amounts to exploitation of Labour, violative of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of Indian and Art.7 of International Covenant. Therefore, the Hon'ble Supreme Court directed the Government and other authorities to pay wages to the workmen who are employed as casual labourers belonging to several categories at the rates equivalent to the minimum pay in the pay scales of regularly employed workers in the corresponding cadres. The Supreme Court directed the authorities to prepare a scheme on a rational basis for absorbing the casual labourers as far as possible who have been continuously working for more than one year in the posts and Telegraphs Department. It is submitted that in the case of the employees of the Petitioners association the Respondents failed to honour the Apex Court judgements. Therefore, the Petitioner association prays that this Tribunal to hold that the employees of the Petitioner's association are working full time regularly and that they are entitled for eligible pay scales with further direction to absorb them as regular employees in the corresponding category/cadre in the interest of justice, as otherwise the employees of the Petitioner 's association will suffer great damage and loss.
3. Respondent No.3 filed counter with the averments in brief as follows:
The Respondent No.3 filed counter challenging the maintainability of the case. In the counter Respondent No.3 while admitting some of the material facts has also challenged the establishment of the Petitioner's association, it is stated that the so called part time postal employees welfare association is not existing and recognised, and also not members of any recognised service unions. The demand of the postal part time employees welfare association is neither just nor lawful. It is further stated by Respondent No.3 that after receipt of the copy of the representation dated 19.1.2006 of the Postal Part time employees welfare Association, Rajahmundry which had been addressed to the Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central), Visakhapatnam on 18.8.2006 vide lr.n o.45/4/2006-ALC-VGA dated 10.8.2006 and to sought[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3535 for reply to the representation of the Petitioners association, the Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central), Vijayawada at Rajahmundry, argued that engagement of people for part time employment is a matter governed by the Departmental regulations and direction of the Government of India and orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Regularization of services of any person engaged in Government Departments is a matter of Departmental representation. Any person seeking redressal of grievances regarding service conditions, employment or any matter connected with the employment in government service and have recourse through Departmental channels failing which such person can approach the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal only. There is no channel available for local discussions on service matters outside the Departmental channels as per the provisions of the Ministry of personnel and Training Office Memo. No. A- 11019/37/85-80, dated 13.8.1985 on establishment of Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1985. In view of this, the Department did not agree for any mediatory efforts of CL for sitting issues for which other channels were established. It is stated that it is a fact that there were 87 part time workers in this division. In the Department of Posts part time employees are engaged on contingent basis for duty ranging from 20 minutes to 6 hours a day. They are being paid allowances from office contingency on pro-rata basis in the minimum of time scale pay plus DA of regular Group-D employees and not from the consolidated fund of India. There are no service conditions such as education, age etc., as most of the part time contingent workers are unskilled, working as sweepers, water carriers, dusters, gardeners and night watchman etc., for limited hours based on work load. Since the sweepers/water carriers and dusters / gardeners are required to attend at the time of opening of the office to sweep / stored the water required for drinking etc., they are not regular employees. It is also submitted that the Director General of Posts, New Delhi which is under the Ministry of Communication and IT is the authority to issue directions to be followed by the Administrative offices in the Department. The orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been taken into consideration and accordingly, allowances were paid on hourly basis including together with DA on pro rata basis of the corresponding to the minimum basic pay of regular Group D employee plus DA w.e.f. 5.2.1986. The allowances paid on hourly basis to the part time employees are more than the hourly rates fixed by the Labour Commissioner, Government of A.P., Hyderabad vide order No. J2/3564/2008-II, dated 1.4.2008. In compliance with the directions, of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, a scheme was drawn up by the Department in consultation with the Ministry of Law, Finance and Personnel for conferring temporary status to those part time employees, who brought on duty for 8 hours in a day. Regarding absorption, no part time official in this division has been engaged for full working hours i.e., 8 hours including half an hour lunch time and as such there are no full time casual labourers with full time work load for regular absorption in this division. The Respondent No.3 submit that having heard the decision of the Department, the Assistant Labour Commissioner(Central), Vijayawada referred the case to the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide its letter No. 8-5/2006-ALC,VGA dated 25.7.2007 as the conciliation proceedings were ended in failure. In turn the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi vide its order No.L-40011/21/2007-IR(DU) dated 27.12.2007 referred the matter to this court for adjudication. Thereafter after receipt of notice from this court in the office on 22.2.2008, Respondent No.3 entered his appearance. Subsequently the Petitioner filed claim statement on 29.1.2009 and the Respondent Department received the same on 12.2.2009. The Respondent No.2 submitted that the above mentioned facts are real facts which are submitted to the court. With the above facts, the Respondent No.3 submitted that the case of the Petitioner is not maintainable in the eye of Law and also prayed for dismissal of the petition.
4. The Petitioner has been examined himself as WW1 and marked no documents on his behalf. Whereas the Respondents have examined Sri N. Raja Ratnam, the Asst. Superintendent of Post Offices as MW1 on their behalf who had also marked eight documents i.e., Ex.M1 to M8.
5. I have already heard the Learned Counsels for both the sides and also gone through the written notes of arguments submitted by the parties.
6 The Points for determination are:
I. Whether the demand of the Postal Part-Time Employee's Welfare Association for regularization of services of Shri I. Krishna and 16 others, as per the Annexure, is legal and justified?
II. If yes, to what relief the workmen are entitled for?
7. Point No.I: During the course of argument the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that 17 postal part time employees of the Petitioners' association are working for more than 18 years with meager salaries in the Respondents' management and as they have been designated as part time employees, they have been paid less than the minimum of the pay scale of the Group D Central Government employees. These postal part time employees are working for more than 8 hours a day. In case of watchmen they have been working 16 hours per day. Inspite of this, the Respondents categorized the Petitioners as part time employees. It is also contended that the so called part time employees are working regularly without any break for the past 25 years for more than 8 hours per day. Therefore, the Petitioners are entitled for full wages as per the pay scales of the Group D central government employees. The Respondents without any reason and rhythm are showing them on the rolls as part time employees and as such the Respondents are exploiting the cheap labour available in the market and shown them as part time employees3536 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] indicating in their records that they are working for less hours of work, ranging between 3 to 6 hours per day, but factually they are working more hours ranging between 8 to 16 hours per day. As per the provisions contained in various labour laws particularly Minimum Wages Act, 1948 with special reference to Sec.15, if a person works on any date for a period less than the requisite number of hours constituting a normal working day, he shall be entitled to receive wages in respect of the work done by him on that day as if he had worked as per full normal working day. Therefore, in any event, the Petitioners are entitled for full normal working day wages on par with Group-D Central Government employees salary. He further contended that the technical staff such as electrician, wiremen, gardener etc., cannot be treated as part time employees since the nature of work is such that they have to work for more than 8 hours per day. Further the watchmen are employed for more than 16 hours per day and as such they are also cannot be treated as part time employees. All the employees of the association are working for more than 8 hours per day and from the nature of duties performed as well as their length of service to the Department would make them eligible for regularization apart from full days salary on par with Group D employees. He also contended that in the case of P & T Department through Bharathiya Dock Gjar Mazdur Much Vs. Union of India and others reported in AIR 1987 SC 2342, their Lordship has categorically held that the denial of minimum pay in pay scales of regular employees, amounts to exploitation of labour, violative of Articles 14 and 16 for the Constitution of India and Article 7 of the International Covenant. Therefore, the apex Court directed the Government and other authorities to pay wages to the workmen who are employed as casual labour belonging to several categories at the rates equivalent to the minimum pay in the pay scales of regularly employed workers in the corresponding cadre. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also directed the authorities to prepare a scheme on a rational basis for absorbing as far as possible the casual labourers who have been continuously working for more than one year in the Posts and Telegraph Department. He also contended that in the case of the Petitioners the Respondents have failed to honour the Apex Court judgement. He submitted that the employees of the Petitioners association are entitled to for salaries equivalent to full time employees in Group D pay scales at the minimum of the Central Government Pay Scales. He further submitted that the nature of duties of electrician, wireman, gardener, watchmen etc., would show that the working hours were spread over for more than 10 hours per day. All the 17 employees of the Petitioners association are working with the Respondent management directly and not through any middleman / contractor. The documents produced by the Respondent vide Ex.M1 shows that the members of the Petitioners association are working for 6 hours or less than 6 hours per day, but MW1 in his cross examination has categorically admitted that the employees at Sl.No.2 to eight of Ex.M1 are working from 9 AM to 6 PM(9 hours). He further admitted that Sri T. Krishna, whose name appears at Sl.No.1 of Ex.M1 admittedly working from 8 AM to 6 PM, as Scavanger cum Gardener at Postal Dispensry at Rajahmundry. Similarly, Sri A.V.B. Subba Rao, Electrician, at Sl.No.9 of Ex.M1 admittedly working/ attending to all emergencies at the beck and call and discharging duties as electrician. MW1 also admitted that no fixed duty hours are given to these employees and the electrician is on duty round the clock attending to emergencies. Thus, MW1 has categorically admitted that Smt. T.V. Ramanamma, Sl.No.10 in Ex.M1 was the water carrier and she also attends to gardening work till 5 PM. The witnesses examined on behalf of the Respondent management clearly admitted that the employees shown in Sl.No.1 to 10 in Ex.M1 have been working for more than 8 hours per day. But Ex.M1 relied on by the Respondent shows that the employees are working for six hours or less per day. Col.No.4 of Ex.M1 shows that it was daily work load of the employees. But the management has not placed any material to show as to how the work load is assessed. The management witness clearly admitted that Sl.No.1 to 10 of the list annexed are working for more than 8 hours per day. Similarly, as shown under Ex.M1, Sl.No.11 to 17 are also working for more than six hours per day, as per the work load it was indicated in Col.No.4 of Ex.M1. Basing on the nature of work, the employees mentioned in Sl.NO.11-17 are performing their duties i.e., 8 hours per day as admitted by MW1 in his cross examination. He also contended that once the employees of the Petitioners association are held to be working full day, they are entitled for salary at the minimum basic of the Group-D employee plus D.A. from the date of their appointment with the Respondent. Lastly, relying on the decision of the Apex Court reported in AIR 1987 SC 2342, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contended that the Apex Court in the above decision has held that the workmen who are employed a casual labourers belonging to the several categories of employees in the Postal and Telegraphs Department are entitled at the rates equivalent to the minimum pay in the pay scales of the regularly employed workers in the corresponding cadres but without any increments and other perks. It is submitted that the above decision squarely applies to the Petitioners of this case. Lastly, he contended that as the 17 employees are working for full 8 hours duty as casual employees they are entitled at the rates equivalent to the minimum pay in the pay scales of the regularly employer workers in the corresponding cadres and they may be paid accordingly from the dates of their engagement with the Respondents' management.
8. On the other hand, the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents contended that none of the 17 part time employees are working more than 10 hours per day, but they are working for six hours or less than six hours per day only. In the Department no part time watchmen is engaged during the day time, and being engaged as a night watchman with duty hours as prescribed in the Department. The part time night watchman those who watch the office overnight are being paid for 6 hours and for 9 hours of night stay. The part time staff was not employed through middleman/ contractor. All the 17 petitioners / employees of the Petitioner association were not recruited as per the statutory rules as followed for the regular employees in fact they do not have any set of recruitment rules. He further[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3537 contended that Sri I. Krishna, Scavenger cum Gardener, Postal dispensary, Rajahmundry at Sl.No.1 of Ex.M1 is not working for more than 6 hours as the Postal dispensary works from 8 AM to 2 PM only and no gardening work is attached to the post for the present as there is no garden available in the postal dispensary since long. As regards Sri A.V. Subba Rao, Electrician at Sl.No.9 in Ex.M1 did not work for more than 6 hours any day even in the emergency. He fairly submitted that no fixed duty hours had been given to the employees and as such it is not correct to say that Sri A.V. Subba Rao, works beyond 6 hours a day and as regard, Smt T V Ramanamma, water carrier cum gardener, at Sl.No. 10 in Ex.M1, too did not work more than six hours in any day. There is no duty hours fixed for water carrier and gardening work and she attends the work during the morning hours only but not till 5 PM or 6 PM as the most of the post offices remain closed by 5 PM. as per his contention none of the art time employees in Rajahmundry division have been working for more than 8 hours. Regarding work load, the par time employees as shown in the Col.No.4, of Ex.M1 is arrived based on the norms prescribed by the Department of Posts. There is no specific working hours fixed for part time employees and as such no working hours is furnished. None of the part time employees listed in Ex.M1 are full time employees but the allowances are fixed on pro-rata basis on par with regular group D employees. He also contended that even though there is no specific working hours for part time employees, all the part time employees are working during the working hours of the office where they are attached for the work load mentioned in the annexure as they are not working for more than six hours in a day, no full time allowances are justified. The part time employees are paid wages with reference to their work load and the work load of any of the part time employees is not above six hours. Hence, their demand to get full time wages is not justified. He further contended that the Petitioners association of Rajahmundry division is not a recognized one since most of the labour are available in India. he also contended that 17 employees of the Petitioners association were not recruited by following the required recruitment rules as was followed for regular employees. They do not have any set of recruitment rules. Therefore, the categorization of 17 part time casual employees in the Petitioners association mentioned in annexure Ex.M1 as full time employees is not agreeable in the light of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India passed in Civil Appeal Nos. 3595-3612 of 1999, 1861- 2063 and 3849/2001, 3520-3524/2002 and 1968 of 2006 (arising out of SLP(C) 9103-9105 of 2001) decided in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors. Vs. Umadevi and Ors. on 10.4.2006. In the above referred case, their Lordships held that "Unless the appointment was in terms of the relevant rules, the same would not confer any right on the appointee – Temporary employees could not claim to be made permanent on the expiry of his term of appointment- Merely because a temporary employee or a casual wage worker was continued for a time beyond the term of his appointment, he would not be entitled to be absorbed in regular service or made permanent – Due to long service, an adhoc employee did not acquire any right to permanent appointment." The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also observed that the State is also controlled by economic consideration and financial implications in public employment. The viability of the Department is also equally concerned for the State. The State works out the scheme taking into consideration the financial implications and economic aspects. If the court envisages a direction to give the permanent employment to all above who are being temporary or casual employees, may become so heavy by such a direction, that State/undertaking itself may collapse under the own weight. So the Court ought not to impose financial burden on the State by such direction. It is further stated that often the courts are in expectation to issue directions for making such persons permanent in service. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted that in view of the observation of the Apex Court in the above cited case Law, the court should not pass such an order giving burden to the Respondents management which is a central government organization.
9. On consideration of the rival contentions of both the sides it is seen that the part time postal employees have admittedly been working in the Respondents organization for more than 25 years, they have not been recruited following the required recruitment rules. But they are claiming to be regularized and claiming to get payment on par with regular employees. Even though MW1 admitted that the part time employees are working for more than 8 hours, it is not known, how a gardener and an electrician are working for more than 6 hours in a day because their work is not continuous. It is not known how MW1 admitted that a scavenger is working for more than 8 hours in a day in the dispensary at Rajahmundry. Normally the dispensary used to get opened at 8 AM to 2PM. In such a place how a scavenger will work for more than 6 hours in a day. In fact, the Petitioner workers are working on temporary basis and they have not been regularized, and since they have not been recruited following the required recruitment rules as followed for the regular employees, they cannot get permanent regularization. No where the Petitioners have mentioned the extent of payment they are getting. The Respondents are submitting that the employees of the Petitioners association are getting minimum wages on par with the group D employees of the Central Government. But none of the employees have submitted that they are not getting payment as per with the Minimum Wages Act, on par with the group D employees. In the case at hand, relying on the decision of the Apex Court decided in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors. Vs. Umadevi and Ors, as cited above, it can safely be held that when the part time postal employees union have not been given any appointment and have not been recruited following the required recruitment rules, as followed for the regular employees, they are not entitled to get their wages on par with the regular employees. Therefore, the demand of the Postal Part Time Employees' Welfare Association for regularization of services of Shri I. Krishna and 16 others, as per annexure, is not legal and justified.
3538 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]Thus, Point No.I is answered accordingly.
10. Point No.II: In view of the findings arrived at Point No.I, the Petitioners are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
Thus, Point No.II is answered accordingly.
Result;
In the result, the reference is answered as under:
The demand of the Postal Part Time Employees' Welfare Association for regularization of services of Shri I. Krishna and 16 others, as per annexure, is not legal and justified. As such, the Petitioners are not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.
Award is passed accordingly. Transmit.
Dictated to Smt. P. Phani Gowri, Personal Assistant transcribed by her and corrected by me on this the 28th day of February, 2019.
MURALIDHAR PRADHAN, President Officer
Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for the Witnesses examined for the Petitioner Respondent
WW1: Sri A V B Subba Ro
MW1: Sri N. Raja Ratnam
Documents marked for the Petitioner
NIL
Documents marked for the Respondent
Ex.M1: Photostat copy of particulars of 17 part time employees with work load
Ex.M2: Photostat copy of DG, P&T New Delhi lrs. No.24-6/60-TE, dt.6.8.1962, No.15-71/64-TE, dt.
23.4.1963, and No.15-16/67-TE dt 8.9.1967
Ex.M3: Photostat copy of Hon'ble apex Court order in case No.1098/2003
Ex.M4: Photostat copy of order passed in State of Karnataka and Ors. Vs. Umadevi & ors. dt. 10.4.2006 Ex.M5: Photostat copy of order of ALC(C) No.J2/3564/2008-II dt.1.4.2008
Ex.M6: Photostat copy of minutes of conciliation proceeding dt.16.7.2007
Ex.M7: Photostat copy of lr.No.8-5/2006-ALC, Vijayawada dt.25.7.2007
Ex.M8: Photostat copy of authorization lr. dt. 10.6.2013 issued by Supdt. Of Post offices, Rajahmundry Division, Rajahmundry.
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-819.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ eq[; egkizca/kd nwjlapkj foHkkx] [kkuiqj] vgenkckn ¼xqtjkr½ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn&1 ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 346@2000½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 8-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3539
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.819.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 346/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Chief General Manager, Telecom Department, Khanpur, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 8.04.2019.
[No. L-40012/327/2000–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 02nd April, 2019
Reference: (CGITA) No. 346/2004
1. The Chief General Manager,
Telecom Department, Khanpur, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380001
2. The Director of Maintenance (Telecom),
Microwave Building, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380009
3. The Sub-Divisional Engineer,
Satellite Microwave Building, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) – 380009 …First Parties
V/s
Shri Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar, C/o R.C. Pathak, 4, Deeplex Applad Society Road, Nehru Park, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) - 380015
…Second Party
For the First Parties : Shri N.K. Trivedi For the Second Party : Shri R.C. Pathak and Shri Chintan Gohel
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-40012/327/2000– IR(DU) dated 28.09.2000 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the action of the management of Department of Telecom in terminating/disengaging Shri Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar, Driver w.e.f. 04.03.1997 is legal and justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?"
1. The reference dates back to 28.09.2000 and received on 16.10.2000 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2. After issuing notice to the parties, the second party submitted the statement of claim Ex. 5 on 20.11.2000 and the first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 on 03.08.2001.
3. The second party workman Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar, hereinafter referred to as 'workman' in his statement of claim Ex. 5 has alleged that he had been working as driver under the direct control of first party management i.e. The Chief General Manager, Telecom Department, Khanpur, Ahmedabad, The Director of3540 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Maintenance (Telecom), Microwave Building, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad and The Sub-Divisional Engineer, Satellite Microwave Building, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, hereinafter referred to as 'first party' since 01.01.1994 and worked till 04.03.1997 continuously with full satisfaction to the first party but his services were terminated on 04.03.1997 without following the due procedure of law and without giving any notice and notice pay. The first party has not prepared and published the seniority list violating the provisions of Rule 77 of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules. The first party also recruited fresh hands and retained employees junior to the workman after his termination of service violating the provisions of Section 25 G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as 'Act'. He has further alleged that he worked as daily wager for number of years which was unfair labour practice under Section 25 T of the Act read with Schedule 5 of the Act. Thus he has prayed for setting aside the termination order and also prayed for reinstatement of his services.
4. The first party submitted the written statement Ex. 8 submitting that this workman had been working under Sub- Divisional Engineer, Satellite Microwave, Ahmedabad from April 1995 to 1997 with a details of 144 days in the year 1995-96 and 113 days in the year 1996-97 purely on daily wage basis as and when need arise through contractor. He never served the first party for more than 240 days in any of the calendar year. His services had never been terminated by the first party. As he was an outsourced employee, therefore, contractor might have terminated his service. Contractor was made aware that the services of the driver would be on need basis and also on purely temporary basis. No seniority list was prepared of the daily wagers. No junior daily wager has been retained as alleged by the second party workman and no fresh recruitment has been made.
5. The first party submitted the documents vide list Ex. 12.
6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues arise:
i. Whether the action of the management of Department of Telecom in terminating/disengaging Shri Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar, Driver w.e.f. 04.03.1997 is legal and justified?
ii. To what relief, if any, the concerned workman is entitled?
7. Issue No. i and ii: As both the issues are interrelated, therefore, are decided together. The burden of proof of these issues lies on the second party workman who submitted the affidavit Ex. 14 reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim and has not said anything contrary to his examination-in-chief.
8. The first party submitted the affidavit Ex. 18 of one Babubhai Bhagavandas Patel, Divisional Engineer (Telephones), reiterating the averments made in the written statement Ex. 8 stating that the workman had been working since 01.03.1994 to 02.02.1995 with a total days of 222 days. Thereafter, he was engaged as casual driver on contract basis from April 1995 to February 1997 for 144 days in the year 1995-96 and 113 days in the year 1996-97. In his cross-examination, he has stated that the document Ex. 22 (attached with Ex. 9) which is a certificate issued by Sub-Divisional Engineer (UHF), INST. II, Ahmedabad is genuine which reveals that this workman was engaged as causal driver for February and March 1995 for driving the vehicle of Sub-Divisional Engineer (UHF), INST. II, Ahmedabad. Thereafter, he was engaged through contractor D.B. Gandhi from April 1995 till the year 1997. In the year 1997, a regular driver came back and joined the service, therefore, this workman was discharged from his duty but he does not know as to how the regular driver appeared and joined the duty in place of this workman. It is true that this workman was not given any notice and notice pay. He also does not know as to why this workman initially engaged as casual worker directly by the department was engaged through contractor later on.
9. Both the parties submitted the written arguments. The second party in his arguments has emphasised that this workman was engaged as daily wager directly by the department and later on, he was engaged through contractor. This fact has not been denied by the witness named Chandrakant Shamjibhai Patel of the first party in his affidavit Ex. 21. The first party's advocate in his argument has emphasised that this workman was a daily wager and engaged through contractor. He never worked for more than 240 days in any calendar year. Therefore, on the basis of the judgements in Secretary State of Karnataka and others V/s Uma Devi, 2006 SC C (L&S) 753 and BSNL V/s Teja Singh, Civil Appeal No. 292/2009, Supreme Court Indian Kanoon.org/doc/653775, this workman cannot be reinstated and regularised because the first party BSNL has its own recruitment rules and its reinstatement would amount to back door entry.
10. The second party workman has not submitted his appointment letter and has admitted that he was engaged as daily wager for 2 months, thereafter, as a outsourced employee for 2 years but the first party has failed to prove as to how a regular driver was appointed or joined by way of transfer. Thus the first party has been concealing[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3541 the truth. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award a lump-sum amount of Rs.50000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the second party workman Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar. Both the issues are decided accordingly.
11. The first party is directed to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs. 50000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand) to the second party workman Kailashkumar Ambadas Bhulekar within 60 days from the publication of the award.
12. The award is passed accordingly.
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-820.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ funs'kd]ljnkj oYyHkHkkbZ jk"Vªh; izkS|ksfxdh laLFkku] bpkukFk] lwjr ¼xqtjkr½ vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] vgenkckn&1 ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 111@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 22-04-2019 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.820.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 111/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Ahmedabad as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Ichhanath, Surat (Gujarat) & Others, and their workmen, which were received by the Central Government on 8.04.2019.
[No. L-42011/20/2013–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT,
AHMEDABAD
Present: Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi, Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad, Dated 11th April, 2019
Reference: (CGITA) No- 111/2013
The Director, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Ichhanath, Surat (Gujarat)
… First Party
V/s
The Secretary, Surat Jilla Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, B/206, Capital Complex, Beside Pratik Row House, Hany Park Road, Adajan, Surat (Gujarat)
… Second Party
For the First Party : None3542 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] For the Second Party : Shri Hitesh D. Katharotiya
AWARD
The Government of India/Ministry of Labour, New Delhi by reference adjudication Order No. L-42011/20/2013–IR(DU) dated 24.05.2013 referred the dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule:
SCHEDULE
"Whether the establishment of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat falls under the definition of 'Industry' as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If yes, 'Whether the demand of the Surat Jilla Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Surat for reinstatement in service of Smt. Neelam Godara, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Mr. Hari Prakash Mishra in the establishment of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat (terminated on 14.05.2012) is legal, proper and just? What relief these concerned workmen are entitled to?"
1. The reference dates back to 24.05.2013 and received on 10.06.2013 from Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi for adjudication and passing the award.
2. In response to the notice issued to the parties, the second party union submitted the statement of claim Ex. 6 on 27.09.2018 alleging that the second party workmen namely Neelam Godara, Ajay Kumar, Rishi Raj Singh, Hari Prakash Mishra were members of the Surat Jilla Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Surat, a registered union under the Bombay Trade Union Act which has raised this dispute on behalf of the workmen. These workmen have been working in the first party Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, hereinafter, referred to as 'first party' since long. Their services were terminated on 14.05.2012 in violation of Section 33 A of the Industrial Disputes Act as the first party did not sought permission from the appropriate authority despite the fact that the matter was pending before the Assistant Labour Commissioner for re-conciliation. It is further alleged that the procedure in the Industrial Dispute Act were not followed at the time of termination of their services, therefore, the termination was illegal and liable to be set aside. Thus they have prayed for reinstatement with back wages declaring the termination as illegal and void.
3. The first party despite issuing notice did not prefer to appear and submit written statement, therefore, on 14.02.2019, the reference was ordered to be heard ex-parte against the first party.
4. All the workmen namely Neelam Godara, Ajay Kumar, Rishi Raj Singh, Hari Prakash Mishra submitted their affidavits vide Ex. 8 to 11 respectively reiterating the averments made in the statement of claim. Thus the reference is disposed of as ex-parte with the observation as under: "The establishment of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat falls under the definition of 'Industry' as per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The demand of the Surat Jilla Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, Surat for reinstatement in service of Smt. Neelam Godara, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Mr. Hari Prakash Mishra in the establishment of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat (terminated on 14.05.2012) is legal, proper and just."
5. The Director, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat is directed to reinstate all the aforesaid workmen within 30 days from the publication of the award with a lump-sum back wages of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) to each workman.
6. The award is passed accordingly.
P.K. CHATURVEDI, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-821.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ MCY;w-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 54@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3543
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.821.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 54/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2019.
[No. L-22012/118/2013–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER, CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/54/2013-14
Date: 26.04.2019
Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager, Gouri Open Cast Minesof Ballarpur Area, WCL, Post Gouri, Tehsil: Rajura, Distt. Chandrapur (M.S.).
Versus
Party No.2 : The General Secretary, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar Ward, Post – Ballarpur, Chandrapur (M.S.).
AWARD
(Dated: 26th April 2019)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/118/2013 (IR (CM-II) dated 11.09.2013, with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the management of Gauri sub Area of Ballarpur, Western Coalfields Limited, in
denying employment to Ku. Vaishali the dependant daughter of Shri Maroti Devaji Lande, who has
already more than 35 years service, which is contrary to the provisions of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA is legal &
justified? If not, to what relief is the workman is entitled to?"
2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress ('Party No. 2" in short), filed the statement of claim and the management of Western Coalfields Limited ("Party No. 1" in short) filed their written statement.
3. According to the Party No. 2, Shri Maroti Devaji Lande was appointed as a permanent workman of Party No. 1. He rendered 35 years of continuous service and retired on 30.06.2012 from Gauri Open Cast Mine as Office Supdtt.
4. Provision of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA provides the workman to dependant employment, but Party No. 1 refused to appoint him as dependant of ex-employee. The CGIT, Dhanbad on 19.10.1987 passed an award, in which, demand of employment was accepted, so according to the Party No. 2, they prayed that, action of the Party No. 1 for not proving employment to the dependant of ex-employee is not justified and also prayed award must be passed in favour of Party NO. 2 and prayed for other relief.
5. The Party No. 1 filed its written statement as raising preliminary objection that, this reference is not maintainable in the eye of law and there is no industrial dispute existing between the Party No. 2 and the Party No. 1. According to the Party No. 1, they are governed by NCWA. Till today, NCWA – I to IV have been formulated. JBCCI also issued Implementation Instruction. No provision in NCWA-VII from 01.07.2001 to 30.06.2006 for the provision of dependant's employment to an employee, who retired from service of the company on attaining 60 years of age and no such provision for providing employment to the dependant of an employee, who retires from service of the company.
3544 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]6. According to the Party No. 1, very concept of provisions of employment to a dependant, just because his parents have served in the company for a particular period is against the article 16 of the Constitution. So, Party No. 1 denied all facts regarding the legality of dependant employment of ex-employee. So, Party No. 1 prayed that, reference is likely to be rejected with heavy cost.
7. The Party No. 2 filed its rejoinder by asserting all facts, which was mentioned in the statement of claim. They also denied all pleadings taken by the Party No. 1 in their written statement. According to them, it was incumbent on the part of Party No. 1 to provide employment, but the Party NO. 1 failed to do so and prayed that, statement of claim is allowed.
8. Point of determination:
i. Whether the claim of the Party No. 2 is genuine or legal?
ii. Whether Party No. 2 is entitled to any relief?
Reason of determination:
9. The Party No. 2 filed its evidence on affidavit on 11.11.2014, but he never turned up in the Court for cross- examination. So, documents and affidavit have been neither proved nor verified. So, in my opinion, he is unable to prove his case. Now I want to mention the legal position.
Case laws:- Yogender Pal Singh and others Vs. Union of India and others AIR 1987 SC 1015 and Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area No. XI of Ms BCCL, Dhanbad Vs. the Presiding Officer, Dhanbad W.P. (L) No. 2412 of 2002 dated 26.07.2012, in which Hon'ble Court laid down the following principles:-
i. "There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the state".
ii. No dependent of an employee of the State or its instrumentality is entitled to claim preference in the matter of on public employment on the basis of the service of his father/parent is no longer res integra in view of the specific provision contain in Part III of the Constitution of India and also laid down in the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in number of cases.
10. Judging the present case in hand with the touch stone of the principles as mentioned above, my humble opinion is that, Party No. 2 fails to prove his case. So, Party No. 2/workman is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the management of Gauri sub Area of Ballarpur, Western Coalfields Limited, in denying
employment to Ku. Vaishali the dependant daughter of Shri Maroti Devaji Lande, who has already more than 35
years service, which is contrary to the provisions of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA is legal & justified. The workman is not
entitled to any relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-822.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ MCY;w-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 41@2004½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.822.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 41/2004) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2019.
[No. L-22012/206/2003–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3545
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/41/2004
Date: 16.04.2019
Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager, Western Coalfields Limited, Nandan sub Area, Kanhan Area, Chhindwara.
Versus
Party No.2 : The General Secretary, Rashtriya Koyla Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (INTUC), Post : Chandametta, Chhindwara.
AWARD
(Dated:16th April, 2019)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Rashtriya Koyla Khadana Mazdoor Sangh (INTUC) for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/206/2003 (IR (CM-II) dated 24.03.2004, with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the Sub Area Manager of Nandan Group of Mines of Western Coalfields Limited,
Kanhan Area, Post Nandan, Distt. Chhindwara, MP in terminating the services of Shri Baliram s/o Shri
Gendrao, Tub Loader, Nandan Mines No.2, w.e.f. 14.7.98 is justified? If not, to what relief the workman
is entitled?"
2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, "Rashtriya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh (INTUC)" filed the statement of claim on behalf of the workman, Shri Baliram Gendrao ("the workman" in short) and the management of the WCL (here-in- after referred to as the Party No.1) filed its written statement.
The case of the union as projected in the statement of claim is that the workman was a permanent UG Tub Loader at Nandan Colliery Mine No.2 and the service record of the workman was unblemished before issuance of the charge sheet by the Party No.1 on 24.6.97 and the workman while working as a Tub Loader in the first shift on 22.3.1996 sustained fracture injury in his left leg and he was referred by the colliery doctor to Kanhan Area Hospital, where his leg was plastered, due to his sustaining multiple fractures in his leg and he was granted injury on duty leave and the workman was charge sheeted by the Manager, Nandan Colliery No.2 by letter dt.23.3.96 wrongly and as such, the said letter was voluntarily withdrawn by the management vide letter dated 30.4.96, after it was pointed out by the union about the workman sustaining fracture injury in his leg on 22.3.96, while on duty and the workman was referred to Parmanand Rehabilitation Centre, WCL, Chhindwara for examination and further management, by letter dt.22.6.96 of the Deputy Chief Medical Office, Kanhan Area and the workman attended the rehabilitation centre and he was advised to take rest till recovery and the workman was directed to appear before the Kanhan Area Hospital in the month of February, 97 for assessment of his fitness to resume duties and accordingly, the workman was examined at Kanhan Area Hospital, but the result of the said examination was never communicated to him, therefore, the workman was deemed to have been continued on injury leave, but the Party No.1 issued a charge sheet on 24.6.97, on the allegation of the workman remaining unauthorized absent, to which the workman submitted his reply, but the Party No.1 vide order dated 7.9.97 constituted the departmental enquiry and the Inquiry Officer held the sittings of the enquiry on 24.10.97, 2.11.98 and 27.2.98, but notices of the enquiry were never received by the workman before the dates of the enquiry and the workman had communicated about such late receipt of the enquiry notices to be Inquiry Officer, as well as to the Manager of the colliery, but the Inquiry Officer recorded the statement of witnesses of the management in the second setting of the enquiry on 2.1.98, in absence of the workman and concluded the enquiry ex-parte on 27.2.98 and by order dated 13.7.98, the Party No.1 issued the order of dismissal of the workman from service w.e.f. 14.7.98 and as per the certified standing orders, the workman was entitled for a copy of the report of the Inquiry Officer, before imposition of the punishment, but the workman was not supplied with the copy of the report of the Inquiry Officer and no second show3546 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] cause notice was issued to him and as such, the order of dismissal of the workman from service is in violation of the statue and bad in law and is deserved to be set aside. The further case of the union is that subsequent to the dismissal of the workman from service, the workman raised an industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Chhindwara, who ceased the matter for conciliation and during the course of conciliation proceedings, the management agreed to consider for re-employment of the workman, in case of his giving consent to accept alternative job in time rated scale, as there were surplus UG Loaders with WCL and based on the said assurance, the matter was closed and the Personnel Manager by letter dt.28.3.99 asked the workman to give his consent to accept re-employment in alternate time rated job and the workman by letter dt.9.4.99 submitted his consent to the Area Personnel Manager, WCL, Kanhan Area to work as time rated worker, but the Party No.1 did not re-employ the workman as assured before the ALC, Chhindwara and as such, the workman approached the union and the union raised the industrial dispute before the ALC, Chhindwara and as the conciliation ended in failure, the ALC submitted failure report to the central Government and as such, the Central Govt. referred the dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication. The further case of the union is that the Inquiry Officer held the departmental enquiry ex-parte without verifying as to whether the notice of the enquiry was received by the workman before the date of the enquiry or not and as the notices of the enquiry from the Inquiry Officer were received by the workman after due dates of the enquiry, the enquiry conducted by the Inquiry Officer was bad in- law and as the copy of the Medical Examination of the workman held in February,97 was not supplied to him, the action of the management declaring the workman fit to resume duties was an act of unfairness and as such, the departmental enquiry conducted against the workman is vitiated and the order of dismissal is liable to be set aside. It is prayed on behalf of the workman to quash the order of dismissal of the workman from service and to set aside the same and to reinstate the workman in service with full back wages and other consequential benefit with continuity of service.
3. The Party No.1 in its written statement has pleaded inter-alia that the services of the workman was terminated w.e.f. 14.7.98, but he challenged the dispute only in the year 2004, which is highly belated and therefore, he is not entitled to any relief and the reference is not maintainable as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Nedungadi Bank Limited Vs K.P.Madhavan Kutti and others reported in AIR SC 879 and the workman was working as Tub Loader and he was a habitual absentee and he was irresponsible and was not interested in his job and the workman while working as a Tub Loader sustained injuries and he was given complete treatment for the injuries sustained by him and was also paid IOD payment during the aforesaid period and he was medically examined and was declared medically fit by the Area Medical Board on 3.2.98 and his PD was assessed at O %, but the workman did not turn up for duties and remained absent unauthorisedly without sanction of leave and without any application for leave and as such, he was issued with the charge sheet No.834 dt.24.6.97 and the workman submitted his reply to the said charge sheet and as the reply was not found satisfactory, it was decided to conduct a departmental enquiry vide office order No.896 dt.7.9.97 and Shri K.V.Lavera, Assistant Manager was appointed as the Inquiry Officer and the hearing of the enquiry was fixed on 24.10.97, 2.1.98 and 27.2.98 and the workman was duly intimated about each date of hearing of the enquiry vide memo No.917 dt.20.10.97, 956 dt.19.12.97 and No.26 dt.23.1.98 and the workman submitted an application dt.6.11.97 and also another application on 1.1.98 to the Inquiry Officer for adjournment of the hearing of the enquiry and the Inquiry Officer adjourned the enquiry from time to time and in spite of the same, the workman did not take part in the enquiry on 27.2.98 for reasons best known to him and as such, the enquiry was proceeded ex-parte against him and the management led oral and documentary evidence in support of the charges in the departmental enquiry and as the workman failed to avail the opportunity to defend the case, the enquiry proceedings were closed and the Inquiry Officer submitted his enquiry report holding the workman guilty of the charges and the entire enquiry papers were placed before the competent authority for consideration and after examination of the report, the relevant documents on record and assessment of the evidence on record the competent authority was satisfied about the correctness of the conclusion drawn by the Inquiry Officer and agreed with the findings of the Inquiry Officer and ultimately vide order No.1039 dt.13.7.98 imposed the punishment on the workman by terminating his services w.e.f. 14.7.98 and the departmental enquiry was conducted legally, properly and following the principles of natural justice and the termination of the workman from services is correct, proper, legal and justified.
4. Point of determination:
i. Whether the termination of the workman from service is proper and justified?
ii. Whether the workman is entitled to any relief?
Reason for determination:
5. Besides filing documentary evidence, both the parties led oral evidence in support of their respective claims. The workman examined himself as a witness in support of his case, whereas, Shri Keshao Vithoba Lawadey, the Inquiry Officer in the departmental enquiry held against the workman has been examined as a witness on behalf o the Party No.1.
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 35476. The workman in his examination-in-chief, which is on affidavit, has reiterated the facts mentioned in the statement of claim. However, in his cross-examination, the workman has admitted that he received the charge sheet and he went through the same and was able to understand the contents and he received the first notice regarding the sitting of the enquiry after the due date and he applied to the management bringing the said fact to its notice. The workman has further stated in his cross-examination that he received the second notice before the date fixed and he applied for adjournment of the enquiry on medical ground to the Inquiry Officer and he was not informed about the next date of the enquiry.
7. Shri Lawadey has also reiterated the facts mentioned in the WS, in his examination in-chief, which is on affidavit. In his cross-examination, he has stated that the third sitting of the enquiry was fixed to 27.2.98 and notice of the said date was sent to the workman and the workman had received the notice and notice regarding the sitting of the enquiry fixed on 27.2.98 was also sent to the workman by registered post and the postal receipts granted by the Post Office for sending those registered letters have not been filed and he does not remember the name of the Office Peon, through whom, the letter was sent to the workman.
8. My predecessor on 10.05.2011 decided the validity of the departmental enquiry by holding that, departmental enquiry is not legal and justified and there was violation of principles of natural justice, so opportunity to lead evidence was given to the Party No. 1 as well as the workman to prove the charges against the workman.
9. Dr. A.K. Singh was examined on behalf of the Party No. 1. The witness asserted that, he was working in WCL, Kanhan Area since 12 years. He also asserted that, workman, Baliram had met accident in mine on 22.03.1996 and he was given treatment for his injury in the Area hospital and was given IOD leave and was declared fit for original job/duty by the Area Medical Board and workman put his thumb impression on the report of the Medical Board on 03.02.1997. He also asserted that, workman suffered injury of "Comm # of Rt. TIBIA and medical malleolus". In para 10 of his cross-examination, he admitted that, Fitness certificate was issued in Form 'O'. He also admitted that, generally the Medical Board orally intimated the workman and copy of the report was sent to the workman. In this way, he remained unrebutted in his statement.
It also appears that, he was giving his statement after near about 15 years of the incident. He was giving statement on the basis of record. Nothing in his statement shows that, he supported any particular party or enmity with the workman, so his statement appears to be genuine up to above extend. Now I want to see the statement of Dr. Ajay Mohan Verma, who was examined on behalf of the workman.
10. Dr. Ajay Mohan Verma admitted that, a medical certificate dated 20.06.1998 was issued by him to the workman, Shri Balirama Gendrao. He also identified the workman at the time of giving statement. According to him, workman has compressed redicular nerve of spinal cord and manic depressive psychosis, but he admitted in cross- examination that, he treated the workman in OPD. No further record of treatment is available, because record was already destroyed. He also admitted that, to diagnosis such type of disease, person of his qualification does not require any external medical test. He also asserted that, recovery of disease requires minimum three months. He also admitted that, he is medically specialist i.e. he is not a surgeon.
On perusal of his statement, it appears that, he is medical expert and without going to any further investigation, he issued medical certificate in single OPD treatment. On the contrary, workman asserted that, he took treatment after admission in Chhindwara Govt. Hospital for one and half year. On the other side, according to Dr. A.K. Singh, Medical Board issued Fitness Certificate on 03.02.1997 and declared the workman fit from 14.03.1997. In this way Dr. A.K. Singh's statement appears to be more reliable than Dr. Ajay Mohan Verma. Now I want to see the further evidence of the Party No. 1.
11. On behalf of the Party No. 1, Mr. P.K. Tripathi (As a Manager Personnel, Damua Sub Area) and Mr. Prabhu Nath Yadav (Clerk Grade-II) were examined. They supported the defence taken by the Party No. 1. Both of them admitted that, workman, Baliram met with an accident in mine on 22.03.1996. Party No. 1 took care to treat the workman in Area Hospital and provided him IOD leave. They also asserted that, Medical Board declared fit to resume his original duty. Party No. 1 also proved some documents, which are marked as M-4(1) to M-4(6). On perusal of statement of the above witnesses did not show any enmity of these witnesses with the workman. It is correct to say that, these witnesses are giving statement on the basis of the record. So, this evidence appears to be true.
3548 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]12. The workman in his statement admitted that, he requested to the Party No. 1 for light job. He also asserted that, he also approached to the higher officers of Party No. 1, but they refused orally to give him light job. He also admitted that, he approached the hospital for treatment, which was 70 kms always from his residence. He also asserted that, he gave all documents of his treatment to the Party NO. 1, but hospital did not issue Discharge Certificate. He did not also file Xray, Medical reports and other medical examination reports. As I observed from the above discussions, he took treatment in OPD of the Govt. Hospital, Chhindwara.
13. The workman admitted in his cross-examination that, he received charge sheet by post. He also admitted that, notice was received by him regarding sitting of enquiry after due date. He also admitted that, second notice was received before fix date directing to him to appear for hearing. He also admitted that, he took some adjournments on medical ground. In this way, he had knowledge of the departmental enquiry and he participated in the departmental enquiry.
14. 11. In case law--- Delhi Transport Corp. vs. Ombir Singh 2017 LLR 252, Hon'ble Lordship held that "Where principles of natural justice are not being complied with, then in such cases, compensation ought to be granted even if termination of service is found to be valid". On the basis of principle laid down in Engineering Laghu Udhyog Employees Union vs Judge, Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal & others – (2003) 12 SCC 1 in which it was held that:-
"no difference whether the matter comes before the tribunal for approval under S.33 or on a reference under S.10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. In either case if the enquiry is defective or if no enquiry has been held as required by Standing Orders, the entire case would be open before the tribunal and the employer would have to justify on facts as well that its order of dismissal or discharge was proper." "A defective enquiry in our opinion stands on the same footing as no enquiry and in either case the tribunal would have jurisdiction to go into the facts and the employer would have to satisfy the tribunal that on facts the order of dismissal or discharge was proper." These principles are also laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case laws- Punjab Urban Planning & Development authority Vs. Mandip Singh (2016) 7 SCC-571, UPSRTC Vs. Gopal Shukla (2015) SCC 603, Sanjay Singh Vs. National Seed Corporation (2017) 13 SCC 269, V.D. Vegad Vs. State of Gujurat (2017) 2 SCC 508 and Angikr Oriental (Arbic) Higher Secondary School Vs. A.
Harnoon (2017) 2 SCC 510.
15. Judging the present case in hand with the touch stone of the principles as mentioned above, as I observed, the workman failed to prove that, Party No. 1 illegally terminated him from the services, but it appears that, the Party No. 1 did not conduct the enquiry fairly. Due to the defection in the conduction of the departmental enquiry, in my opinion, workman is entitled Lumpsum compensation of Rs. 60,000/- in lieu of reinstatement. Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the Sub Area Manager of Nandan Group of Mines of Western Coalfields Limited, Kanhan Area, Post Nandan, Distt. Chhindwara, MP in terminating the services of Shri Baliram S/o Shri Gendrao, Tub Loader, Nandan Mines No.2, w.e.f. 14.7.98 is justified, but the workman is entitled for Lumpsum monetary compensation of Rs. 60,000/- (Rupees sixty thousand only) in lieu of reinstatement in service, which is payable within one month from the publication of this award in official gazette, failing which, amount due to workman will carry interest of 6% per annum from the date of due to the workman to the date of actual payment of the amount to the workman. The workman is not entitled for any other relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-823.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ MCY;w-lh-,y- ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ukxiqj ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 25@2012½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 10-05-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
jktsUnz flag] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3549
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.823.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 25/2012) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court Nagpur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s W.C.L. and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 10.05.2019.
[No. L-22012/175/2012–IR (CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE SHRI S.S. GARG, PRESIDING OFFICER,
CGIT-CUM-LABOUR COURT, NAGPUR
Case No.CGIT/NGP/25/2012-13
Date: 26.04.2019
Party No.1 : The Sub Area Manager, Ghugus O/c Mines of Wani Area of WCL, Post Ghugus Colliery, Chandrapaur (M.S.).
Versus
Party No.2 : The General Secretary, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar Ward, Post – Ballarpur, Chandrapur (M.S.).
AWARD
(Dated: 26th April 2019)
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section 2(A) of section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ("the Act" in short), the Central Government has referred the industrial dispute between the employers, in relation to the management of Western Coalfields Limited and their union, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress for adjudication, as per letter No.L-22012/175/2012 (IR (CM-II) dated 19.11.2012, with the following schedule:-
"Whether the action of the management of Ghugus O/c Mines of Wani Area of Western Coalfields Limited, in denying employment to Shri Deepak Mallesh Gaddal the dependant son of Shri Gaddal Mallesh Pocham, Ex. Haulage Khalasi, Ghugus O/c Mines of WCL who has already put in 35 years service, which is retired on 30.06.2006 which is contrary to the provisions of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA is legal & justified? To what relief is the workman entitled to?"
2. On receipt of the reference, the parties were noticed to file their respective statement of claim and written statement and accordingly, the union, Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress ('Party No. 2" in short), filed the statement of claim and the management of Western Coalfields Limited ("Party No. 1" in short) filed their written statement.
3. According to the Party No. 2, Shri Gadda, Mallah Pocham was appointed as badlee worker at RJ Colliery on 16.09.1970 and he was retired form services of Party NO. 1 on 30.06.2006 as Haulage Khalasi from Ghugus O/c after completing 36 years of service. The Party No. 2, Deepak Mallah is son of Gaddal Mallah.
4. Provision of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA provides the workman to dependant employment, but Party No. 1 refused to appoint him as dependant of ex-employee. The CGIT, Dhanbad on 19.10.1987 passed an award, in which, demand of employment was accepted, so according to the Party No. 2, they prayed that, action of the Party No. 1 for not proving employment to the dependant of ex-employee is not justified and also prayed award must be passed in favour of Party No. 2 and prayed for other relief.
5. The Party No. 1 filed its written statement as raising preliminary objection that, this reference is not maintainable in the eye of law and there is no industrial dispute existing between the Party No. 2 and the Party No. 1.
3550 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]According to the Party No. 1, they are governed by NCWA. Till today, NCWA – I to IV have been formulated. JBCCI also issued Implementation Instruction. No provision in NCWA-VII from 01.07.2001 to 30.06.2006 for the provision of dependant's employment to an employee, who retired from service of the company on attaining 60 years of age and no such provision for providing employment to the dependant of an employee, who retires from service of the company.
6. According to the Party No. 1, very concept of provisions of employment to a dependant, just because his parents have served in the company for a particular period is against the article 16 of the Constitution. So, Party No. 1 denied all facts regarding the legality of dependant employment of ex-employee. So, Party No. 1 prayed that, reference is likely to be rejected with heavy cost.
7. The Party No. 2 filed its rejoinder by asserting all facts, which was mentioned in the statement of claim. They also denied all pleadings taken by the Party No. 1 in their written statement. According to them, it was incumbent on the part of Party No. 1 to provide employment, but the Party NO. 1 failed to do so and prayed that, statement of claim is allowed.
8. Point of determination:
i. Whether the claim of the Party No. 2 is genuine or legal?
ii. Whether Party No. 2 is entitled to any relief?
Reason of determination:
9. The Party No. 2 filed its evidence on affidavit on 30.12.2014, but he never turned up in the Court for cross- examination. So, documents and affidavit have been neither proved nor verified. So, in my opinion, he is unable to prove his case. Now I want to mention the legal position.
Case laws:- Yogender Pal Singh and others Vs. Union of India and others AIR 1987 SC 1015 and Employers in relation to the management of Bhowra Area No. XI of Ms BCCL, Dhanbad Vs. the Presiding Officer, Dhanbad W.P. (L) No. 2412 of 2002 dated 26.07.2012, in which Hon'ble Court laid down the following principles:-
i. "There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the state".
ii. No dependent of an employee of the State or its instrumentality is entitled to claim preference in the matter of on public employment on the basis of the service of his father/parent is no longer res integra in view of the specific provision contain in Part III of the Constitution of India and also laid down in the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in number of cases.
10. Judging the present case in hand with the touch stone of the principles as mentioned above, my humble opinion is that, Party No. 2 fails to prove his case. So, Party No. 2/workman is not entitled to any relief. Hence, it is ordered:-
ORDER
The action of the management of Ghugus O/c Mines of Wani Area of Western Coalfields Limited, in denying employment to Shri Deepak Mallesh Gaddal the dependant son of Shri Gaddal Mallesh Pocham, Ex. Haulage Khalasi, Ghugus O/c Mines of WCL who has already put in 35 years service, which is retired on 30.06.2006 which is contrary to the provisions of Para 9.4.4 of NCWA is legal & justified. The workman is not entitled to any relief.
S.S. GARG, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 14 ebZ] 2019
dk-vk-824.—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj esllZ vk;qDr] mRrjh fnYyh uxj fuxe] ubZ fnYyh vkSj vU; ,oa muds deZpkjh ds izca/kra= ds laac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ'V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k ,oa Je U;k;ky;] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 64@2015½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 18-03-2019 dks izkIr gq, FksA
oh- ds- Bkdqj] vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3551
New Delhi, the 14th May, 2019
S.O.824.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 64/2015) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi & Others, and their workmen which were received by the Central Government on 18.03.2019.
[No. L-42011/216/2015–IR (DU)]
V. K. THAKUR, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
BEFORE PRESIDING OFFICER: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL-TRIBUNAL-CUM LABOUR
COURT No. 1, DELHI
ID No.64/2016
Shri Munish Chand & Ramesh Chand, C/o The President, MCD General Mazdoor Union, Room No.95, Barrack No.1/10, Jamnagar House, Shah Jahan Road, New Delhi – 110 011
...Workman
Versus
The Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, 4th Floor, Civic Centre, Minto Road, New Delhi – 110 002
…Management
AWARD
This award shall dispose of a reference received from Ministry of Labour and Employment vide Order No. L-42011/216/2015-IR(DU) dated 04.01.2016 under clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2-A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947(in short the Act) for adjudication of an industrial dispute, terms of which are as under:
'Whether the action of the management by not granting pay scale of 3050-4590 revised from time to time alongwith all consequential benefits to the workmen, Shri Munish Chand and Shri Ramesh Chand, with effect from 01.09.2001 and 21.05.2002, is fair and justified ? If yes, what relief the workmen are entitled to?'
2. Claim statement was filed by the claimant herein averring that the following malis who were performing the duty of acting Chaudhary are denied promotion on grounds that they are not 10th Agriculture:
| S. No. | Name (S/Shri) | Father's Name (S/Shri) | Date of regularization as Mali | Date since when working as Acting Chaudhary | Date of promotion of their juniors |
| 1. | Munish Chand | Matadeen | 01.04.1989 | 01.09.2001 | 04.03.2014 |
| 2. | Ramesh Chand | Kachedu Singh | 01.04.1989 | 21.05.2002 | 04.03.2014 |
2. Ramesh Chand Kachedu Singh 01.04.1989 21.05.2002 04.03.2014 3. The above workmen have been performing their duties as Garden Chaudhary but were not been allowed to participate in the promotion to the post of Garden Chaudhary on the grounds that the claimant is not 10th pass with Agriculture as one of the subjects, which is highly arbitrary and against the recruitment rule which is still not notified by the Government. In the list of malis performing duties of Garden Chaudhary forwarded by the Deputy Director, Karol Bagh Zone (Horticulture), the name of the Shri Munish Chand and Shri Ramesh Chand appears at serial No.17 and (B) - 3 respectively. Some acting chaudharies similarly situated were allowed grant of pay of Chaudhary from the date when they were performing their duty as Garden Chaudhary as per the direction of Hon'ble Tribunal in TA No.1317/2009 in the matter of Sultan Singh Vs. MCD and further direction of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi titled Sultan Singh & others in WP(C) No.7947/2010 and dismissed as withdrawn by Hon'ble Supreme Court of Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.20069/2011 on 09.04.2012. In another writ petition No.5453/2012 titled Sultan Singh Vs MCD Division Bench of3552 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] Hon'ble High Court directed the management to comply with the writ petition order dated 12.11.2010. Management vide order 04.06.2013 directed for payment of duties of higher post (Garden Chaudhary). The claimant was not allowed to participate in the promotion process due to wrong interpretation of the unnotified recruitment rules, that the claimants are not 10th pass with Agriculture. Juniors to the claimant were promoted to the post of Garden Chaudhary with effect from 04.03.2014. Hence the management has not only violated the un-notified recruitment rules but also violated Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India. Hence the management has indulged in unfair labour practice and non- grant of promotion to the claimant is totally illegal, unfair, unjust and discriminatory. Even Hon'ble High Court in a bunch of writ petitions No.7669/2002 has held on 26.02.2004 that 50% promotional posts in which the educational qualification are not required. It is also averred in para 13 of the statement of claim that Hon'ble High Court, Delhi, in the matter of Jai Chand vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (CW 6514/2001) has disapproved the non-payment of wages for those malis who are working on the post of Chaudhary and directed the management not to change the service conditions without following provisions of natural justice, vide its judgement dated 02.05.2003. Juniors to the claimants were promoted as Chaudhary with effect from 04.03.2014 under promotion quota. Finally, it has been prayed that the claimants Shri Munish Chand and Shri Ramesh Chand may be granted promotion as Garden Chaudhary award pay scale of Rs.3050-4590 with all consequential benefits with effect from 01.09.2001 and 21.05.2002 respectively and also promotion as Garden Chaudhary with effect from 04.03.2014.
4. Claim was demurred by the management taking various preliminary objections, inter alia, present dispute not being an industrial dispute as there is no espousal & no demand notice has been served upon the management, union having no locus standi to raise the dispute, claim being misconceived, claim being stale etc. On merits, management has admitted the factum of regularization of the claimants as mali as mentioned in para 2 above. The claimants have also been granted benefit of 1st and 2nd MACP as per provisions of 6th Central Pay Commission. There is prescribed procedure for promotion to the post of Garden Chaudhary and there must be sanctioned/vacant post of Garden Chaudhary to which the workman can lay claim when he has passed trade test conducted by the department. The claimants have never performed duties of Chaudhary and no office order for assigning duties of Chaudhary to the claimants. The management has denied the remaining material facts contained in the statement of claim.
5. Claimants in order to prove their case against the management examined Shri Munish Chand, Shri Ramesh Chand and Shri B.K. Prasad as WW1, WW2 and WW3 whose affidavits are I tender my affidavit in evidence, which is Ex.WW1/A. Alongwith this affidavit, I rely on documents Ex.WW1/1 to Ex.WW1/. These documents may be read in support of my affidavit Ex.WW2/A and Ex.WW3/A respectively. Shri Munish Chand and Shri Ramesh Chand relied on documents Ex.WW1/1 and Shri B.K. Prasad, WW3 relied on documents Ex.WW3/1 to Ex.WW3/3. Management, in order to rebut the case of the claimant examined Shri Subodh Kumar, Assistant Director(Horticulture) as MW1, who tendered in evidence his affidavit Ex.MW1/A and also relied on documents Ex.MW1/1 to Ex.MW1/5.
6. I have heard Shri B.K. Prasad, A/R for the claimant and Shri Madan Sagar, A/R for the management.
7. Admittedly, in the present case, reference has been made under Section 10 sub Section (2A) of the Act for adjudication. It is now well settled position in law that when a reference has been made for adjudication to the Tribunal or Labour Court, as the case may be, it is paramount duty of the court to decide the same on merits, irrespective of the pleas taken by the management. The dispute in the case in hand cannot be said to be stale for the simple reason that there is no previous adjudication of the matter between the parties from a competent court nor that there is inordinate delay in approaching this Tribunal by the claimants.
8. It is clear from the preliminary objections taken in the written statement by the management that the management has raised objection that no demand notice has been served upon the management nor the MCD General Mazdoor Union has any locus standi to raise the present dispute as the union is not a recognized union of the management. To my mind, there is no requirement of law that a dispute can be raised only by a recognized union. In this regard, it is appropriate to refer to the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Bihar Vs. Kripa Shankar Jaiswal (AIR 1961 (2) SC Report 1) wherein also objection was taken on behalf of the management that the union was not a registered under the Trade Union Act on the date of the settlement and said plea was rejected by observing as under:
'Held, that for a dispute to constitute an industrial dispute it is not a requisite condition that it should be sponsored by a recognized union or that all the workmen of an industrial establishment should be parties to it. A settlement arrived at in course of conciliation proceedings falls within Section 18(3)(a) and (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act and as such binds all the workmen though an unregistered union or only some of workmen may have raised the dispute. The absence of notice under Section 11(2) by the Conciliation Officer does not affect the jurisdiction of the conciliation officer and its only purpose is to apprise the establishment that the person who is coming is the conciliation officer and not a stranger. Any contravention of Section 12(6) in not submitting the report within 14 days may be a breach of duty on the part of the conciliation officer ; it does not affect the legality of the proceedings which terminated as provided in Section 20(2) of the Act.
11. There is also ample evidence on record that the workmen herein was performing duty as officiating Chaudhary. It is clear from perusal Ex.WW1/1 that that names of Shri Munesh Chand and Shri Ramesh finds mention at serial[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्रा : मई 18, 2019/वैशाख 28, 1941 3553 No.17 and (B) 3 respectively in the list . There are also averments in the claim statement that one Shri Jai Chand has also been granted pay scale of Chaudhary by the management of MCD and Sultan Singh and others vs. MCD, who were doing work of acting Chaudhary , vide judgement of the Hon'ble High Court, i.e. in the case of MCD vs. Sultan Singh & others and necessary orders for implementation of the said judgement were issued by MCD.
12. Equally merit-less is the plea taken by the management that the present dispute is not sponsored or espoused by substantial number of workmen. It is fairly settled position in law that even non-espousal of a case by the union would not deprive the workman of the relief to which the workman is otherwise entitled under the law. Such view appears to have been taken in the case of Nazrul Hassan Siddiqui vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial cum Labour Court Bombay (1997) Lab.I.C. 1807. In the above cited case also contention was raised by the management that the dispute dies not fall within the definition of 'industrial dispute' and the same has not been referred or supported by substantial section of workmen. High Court rejected the plea of the management by placing reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Associated Cement Companies Ltd. (AIR 1960 SC 777), which it was observed as under:
'We have already noticed that an industrial dispute can be raised by a group of workmen or by a union even though neither of them represent the majority of the workmen concerned; in other words, the majority rule on which the appellant's construction of Section 19(6) is based is inapplicable in the matter of the reference under Section 10 of the Act. Even a minority group of workmen can make a demand and thereby raise an industrial dispute which in a proper case would be referred or adjudication under Section 20.'
13. In view of the ratio of the judgement discussed above, it is clear that espousal of a dispute by majority members of the union is not sine qua non for adjudication of such dispute in terms of Section 10 of the Act.
14. It was strongly contended on behalf of the claimant that juniors to the claimant were allowed to participate in the promotional quota on regular basis but he was denied on the grounds that he was not possessing the requisite qualification of 10th Agriculture.
15. The main attack of the management is that the claimant herein was not having requisite qualification, as such, there is no question of grant of pay scale of Garden Chaudhary to the claimants. There is no merit in the stand taken by the management in its reply, that the claimants herein are not entitled for promotion to the post of Chaudhary inasmuch as he does not possess the requisite qualification. To my mind, this plea is devoid of any merit inasmuch as similarly situated other workers who were performing duties of Chaudhary, i.e. acting Chaudhary have been granted pay scale of Garden Chaudhary after judgement dated 27.07.2011 rendered by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of MCD vs. Sultan Singh as well as MCD vs. Mahipal(WP 5550 of 2010). Operating portion of the judgement in Sultan Singh (supra) of the Hon'ble Division Bench is as under:
"28. Considering the entire facts and circumstances it is apparent that the claim of the respondents have always been that they should be paid the difference in pay of Mali/Chowkidar and the Garden Chaudhary as they were made to work on the post of Garden Chaudhary whereas the petitioner had first denied that they worked as Garden Chaudharies, then took the plea that the Assistant Director (Horticulture) was not competent to ask the respondents to work as Garden Chaudharies and that the respondents cannot be appointed to the post of Garden Chaudharies in accordance with the recruitment rules. There is no doubt that respondents are not claiming appointment to the post of Garden Chaudharies on account of having worked on ad-hoc basis on the post of Garden Chaudhary contrary to rules or that some of them not having the requisite qualifications are entitled for relaxation.
29. In the entirety of facts and circumstances therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to make out any such grounds which will impel this Court to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to set aside the orders of the Tribunal dated 29th January, 2010 and 7th October, 2010 as no illegality or un- sustainability or perversity in the orders of the Tribunal has been made out.
30. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own cost."
16. It is further clear that SLP was also filed by MCD before the Hon'ble Apex Court vide IA No.2 WP for special leave S20069/2011 MCD vs. Sultan Singh and others which was also dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 09.04.2012. It is further clear that the Hon'ble High Court in Sultan Singh case strongly deprecated the stand taken by the management that the workmen were not possessing requisite qualification or have not qualified the test etc. It was clarified that since the workmen were discharging duties to the post of Garden Chaudhary, a such, workmen were entitled for the salary of Garden Chaudhary and competent authority need not look into anything else except the fact that the workman had worked as Garden Chaudhary. Therefore, stand taken by the management that the claimants herein do not possess requisite qualification is without any merit and has no relevance so far as question of grant of promotion to the post of Garden Chaudhary is concerned.
17. It is not out of place to mention here that even if the claimants herein were not a party in Sultan Singh case referred above, judgement of the Hon'ble High Court is binding on the management and management is required to implement the same in letter and spirit and the same is judgement in rem, and all similarly situated workmen are required to be accorded the benefit of the said judgement of the Hon'ble High Court, which have become final. There is no3554 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 18, 2019/VAISAKHA 28, 1941 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)] question of even plea of delay and laches when management had not led any evidence to prove the same. The Hon'ble High Court has decided an abstract proposition of law, i.e. a mali who is performing duty as officiating/acting Chaudhary is entitled to the salary/wages of Chaudhary. Law is fairly settled that if a person is working on a higher post, on adhoc or temporary basis, even such workman is entitled to salary/wages of higher post, unless rules or regulations specifically provides otherwise. I find support to this view from Secretary vs. Lieutenant Governor Port Blair (1998 Lab.I.C. 598), yet in another case, Hon'ble Apex Court while dealing with a similar situation regarding of grant of similar benefits to an employee who was not a party to the writ petition or lis in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava (2015) 1 SCC 347 observed as under:
"The moot question which requires determination is as to whether in the given case, approach of the Tribunal and the High Court was correct in extending the benefit of earlier judgment of the Tribunal, which had attained finality as it was affirmed till the Supreme Court. The legal principles that can be culled from the judgments, cited both by the appellants as well as the respondents, can be summed up as under:
(1) Normal rule is that when a particular set of employees is given relief by the Court, all other identically situated persons need to be treated alike by extending that benefit. Not doing so would amount to discrimination and would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This principle needs to be applied in service matters more emphatically as the service jurisprudence evolved by this Court from time to time postulates that all similarly situated persons should be treated similarly. Therefore, the normal rule would be that merely because other similarly situated persons did not approach the Court earlier, they are not to be treated differently.
(2) However, this principle is subject to well recognized exceptions in the form of laches and delays as well as acquiescence. Those persons who did not challenge the wrongful action in their cases and acquiesced into the same and woke up after long delay only because of the reason that their counterparts who had approached the Court earlier in time succeeded in their efforts, then such employees cannot claim that the benefit of the judgment rendered in the case of similarly situated persons be extended to them. They would be treated as fence-sitters and laches and delays, and/or the acquiescence, would be a valid ground to dismiss their claim.
(3) However, this exception may not apply in those cases where the judgment pronounced by the Court was judgment in rem with intention to give benefit to all similarly situated persons, whether they approached the Court or not. With such a pronouncement the obligation is cast upon the authorities to itself extend the benefit thereof to all similarly situated person. Such a situation can occur when the subject matter of the decision touches upon the policy matters, like scheme of regularization and the like (see K.C. Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India (supra). On the other hand, if the judgment of the Court was in personam holding that benefit of the said judgment shall accrue to the parties before the Court and such an intention is stated expressly in the judgment or it can be impliedly found out from the tenor and language of the judgment, those who want to get the benefit of the said judgment extended to them shall have to satisfy that their petition does not suffer from either laches and delays or acquiescence."
18. As a sequel to my above discussion, it is held that Shri Munesh Chand and Shri Ramesh Chand, the claimants herein, are entitled to the pay scale of Garden Chaudhary with effect from 01.09.2001 and 21.05.2002 respectively and as a corollary, management is liable pay the difference of wages of mali vis-a-vis Garden Chaudhary from the date when the workman herein was performing duties and functions of Garden Chaudhary. The claimants are also entitled to be promoted to the post of Garden Chaudhary from 04.03.2014, i.e. the date when his juniors were promoted as regular Garden Chaudhary. An award is, accordingly, passed. Let this award be sent to the appropriate Government, as required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for publication.
A.C. DOGRA, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.