Gazette Contains Multiple Subjects

click here for IIIF manifest

रजिस्ट्री सं. डीएल—(एन) 04/0007/2003—19 REGISTERED No.- DL—(N) 04/0007/2003—19

xxxGIDExxx

सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-22022020-216317

CG-DL-W-22022020-216317

साप्ताहिक/WEEKLY

प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

सं. 8] नई दिल्ली, शनिवार, फरवरी 22—फरवरी 28, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941)

No. 8] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 22—FEBRUARY 28, 2020 (PHALGUNA 3, 1941)

भाग III—खण्ड 1

[PART III—SECTION 1]

[उच्च न्यायालयों, नियंत्रक और महालेखापरीक्षक, संघ लोक सेवा आयोग, रेल विभाग और भारत सरकार

के संलग्न और अधीनस्थ कार्यालयों द्वारा जारी की गई अधिसूचनाएं]

[Notifications issued by the High Courts, the Comptroller and Auditor General, the Union Public

Service Commission, the Indian Railways and by attached and Subordinate Offices of the

Government of India]

——————

3,

——————

1—466 GI/2019

(301)302 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 –भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 303 304 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 305 306 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 307 308 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 309 310 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 311 312 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 313 314 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 315 316 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 भाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 317 318 भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) [भाग III—खण्ड 1 प्रारूप. सं. एसटीके - 6

सार्वजनिक सूचना

{कंपनी अधिनियम, 2013 की धारा 248 की उपधारा (2) और उपधारा (4) और कंपनी (कंपनी रजिस्टर से कंपनियों का नाम हटाना) नियम, 2016 के नियम 7 के अनुसरण में}

कंपनी अधिनियम, 2013 की धारा 248 (2)के तहत निम्नलिखित कम्पनियों का नाम हटाने के मामले में।

ग्वायिलर -474009, दिनांक 13 फरवरी 2020

सं. 04 [सं. आरओसी-जी/एसटीके-2/2019/2072]--(1) इसके द्वारा यह सूचित किया जाता है कि कंपनी अधिनियम, 2013 की धारा 248 (2) के तहत कंपनी रजिस्ट्रार को निम्नलिखित कंपनियों से कंपनी रजिस्टर से इस आधार पर नाम हटाने का आवेदन प्राप्त किया है कि वे उनकी कंपनी के निगमन के एक वर्ष के भीतर कारबार आंरभ करने में विफल रहे हैं या इस आधार पर कि कंपनी पूर्ववर्ती 2 वित्तीय वर्षो से कारबार नही कर पायी हैं और इस अवधि के भीतर कंपनी अधिनियम, 2013 की धारा 455 के तहत निष्क्रिय कंपनी की स्थिति प्राप्त करने का आवेदन नहीं किया हैं या कंपनी ने निष्क्रिय कंपनी की स्थिति प्राप्त कर ली है, पर वे कंपनी के रूप में पंजीकरण नहीं रखना चाहते और अतः कंपनी रजिस्टर से अपना/अपने नाम हटाने का अनुरोध किया हैं।

(2) तदनुसार कंपनी रजिस्ट्रार, कंपनी रजिस्टर से निम्नलिखित कंपनियों का नाम हटाने का प्रस्ताव करता है।

(3) यदि किसी व्यक्ति को कंपनी रजिस्टर से कंपनियों का नाम हटाने के प्रस्ताव से आपत्ति है ता वह व्यक्ति इस सूचना के प्रकाशन की तारीख से तीस दिन के भीतर निम्नलिखित कार्यालय के पते पर अपनी आपत्ति भेज सकता है।

राजपाल सिंह कम्पनी रजिस्ट्रार

मध्य प्रदेशभाग III—खण्ड 1] भारत का राजपत्र, फरवरी 22, 2020 (फाल्गुन 3, 1941) 321

राजपाल सिंह कम्पनी रजिस्ट्रार मध्य प्रदेश

------------

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

(DIRECTORATE OF COORDINATION, POLICE WIRELESS)

New Delhi-3, the 6th February 2020

No. A-17011/02 (L-45)/2019-Admn.I—Shri Lal Singh, Joint Assistant Director (Cipher) of this Directorate has retired from Government service on attaining the age of superannuation in the afternoon of 31-01-2020.

This issue with the approval of Competent Authority.

GHAN SHYAM Joint Director (Admn)

——————

The 7th Feburary 2020

No. A-17011/03 (G-107)/2019-Admn.I—Shri Gour Mohon Ghosh, Joint Assistant Director of this Directorate has retired from Government service on attaining the age of superannuation in the afternoon of 31-01-2020.

This issue with the approval of Competent Authority.

GHAN SHYAM Joint Director (Admn)

DEFENCE ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT (OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS)

Delhi Cantt.-110010, the 12th February 2020

No. AN/1/1170/LXXXVII—The President is pleased to appoint the under mentioned officers of the Indian Defence Accounts Service in the Senior Time Scale (STS) [(Rs. 67,700—2,08,700) Level 11 of Pay Matrix (7th CPC)] of that Service, with effect from the dates shown against their names, until further orders:—

SWAPNIL AGRAWAL, IDAS Sr. ACGDA (Admin)

MINISTRY OF MINES

(GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA)

Kolkata–700016, the 5th December 2019

No. 5822/SP/A-19012/3-AK/2014-Pers-II—The Competent Authority, Geological Survey of India has kindly accepted the Technical Resignation with Lien as per rule w.e.f. 16.05.2019(FN) from the post of Assistant Chemist in GSI in respect of Shri Anil Kumar, Assistant Chemist (Ex), GSI, WR, Jaipur in order to join to the post of Post Graduate Teacher Chemistry (HES-II) (Group-B Services) in Govt. of Haryana, Education Department, Chandigarh.

RANJIT KUMAR SINGH Dy. Director (P&A) for Director GeneralPART III—SEC. 1] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 22, 2020 (PHALGUNA 3, 1941) 325

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

(RAILWAY BOARD)

New Delhi, the 2nd February 2020

No. 2010/PL/57/5—

Decision :

Board agreed to introduce the framework for competition among PSUs for awarding Railway works.

Detailed modalities for competition among eligible PSUs for Allotment of works by Railway Board

1.0 The Modality:

1.1 The projects/works to be given to PSUs may be identified by the concerned Directorate of Railway Board, taking into consideration the capacity and capability of Zonal Railways to execute works. This exercise should be done preferably at the beginning of the Financial Year and after supplementary budget.

Master list of PSUs eligible for participating in bidding for works would be prepared by ED level Committee in Railway Board, based on category of works proposed to be given to PSUs. The committee shall consist of ED/PSU, Nominated ED from Finance and ED from the concerned directorate. ED/PSU shall be the custodian for the master list which shall be updated from time to time.

1.2 A proposal may be put up to the concerned Board Member for in-principle approval for awarding work by competition amongst PSUs included in the master list of the proposed category work.

1.3 The Nodal Directorate will prepare necessary documents for the quotation. The sanctioned cost and abstract estimate/DPR shall form a part of the document.

1.4 15 days notice will be given to the PSUs for opening of the quotation.

1.5 Tentative completion period of the project will be indicated.

1.6 No earnest money, security deposit or performance guarantee will be taken from the PSUs so invited to participate, before or after award of work.

1.7 The participating PSUs will be required to quote a single mark up as percentage (upto 2 decimal places) of the cost of the project as Consolidated Management Fee. They will not be permitted to quote any special conditions.

1.8 The offer will be dealt by a three member committee comprising of the concerned ED of the Directorate and the ED of Associate Finance, and ED/PSU, and will be accepted by the concerned Member.

2.0 Evaluation of Performance & Awarding of Work:

2.1 After opening of the single pack bids of the PSU, L1 bidder may be awarded the work subject to capacity and performance.

The capacity of PSU to complete projects with reference to past record and available pending projects in hand will be considered while allotting works. The past performance of the PSU's in timely completion of the project shall be considered while awarding the project work to any PSU by the Railway Board.

However, at the time of award of the work, there can be a situation where one PSU may be lowest in all/most of the works. The three member committee may recommend at the time of allotment of work whether to give this work to one PSU or may recommend to distribute the work to other PSUs by giving counter offer to the L2 at the rate of L1, and L3 in case L2 refuses, and so on, in the interest of work. Also, if rates of management fee are high on opening of quotation, negotiation may be called as per normal practice with L1.

2.2 Further award of work (if any) by the PSU shall be done in a transparent manner to ensure price discovery through open transparent and competitive bidding following due procedure and adhering to the CVC guidelines on the subject.

2.3 The mode of contracting by the PSU will be as per latest extant instructions of the Railway Board.

2.4 A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) based on a standard MoU circulated by Railway Board will be executed between the PSU and the concerned Zonal Railway after issue of Acceptance letter by Railway Board.

2.5 As per DPE Guidelines, every year MOU is signed between Ministry of Railways & PSU. The track record of past performance for commissioning of projects would also be made part of MOU for annual evaluation of its performance.

2.6 Track record of past performance in completion & commissioning of works will be an important parameter in awarding of work(s) to PSU.

3.0 Estimates:

3.1 Project will be sanctioned after FLS and preparation of DPR having Detailed Estimate. PSU may choose to validate the same. If any changes are required, it will be proposed by PSU to Zonal Railway. Revised Estimate will be sanctioned by Zonal Railway or Railway Board as per Delegation of Power.

3.2 For faster execution of works quick decision making is the prerequisite. Hence, maximum time limit for sanctioning of estimate in Zonal Railways would be 01 month, else, the delay would be reported by concerned PSU to concerned Railway Board Member for his/her immediate intervention.

3.3 PSU will not have any authority to revise the estimate. However in the interest of project, permission of competent authority can be obtained before executing the variation, pending sanction of Revised Estimate.

4.0 Cost: The cost of the work shall mean the following elements of cost:

4.1 Contractual payment made by the PSU for getting the work executed including variation in quantities, introduction of new items and price variation due to escalation, if any. This will also include cost of all contractual payments made to architects, surveyors, technical/design consultants, for preparation of design/drawing, geotechnical investigation, shifting of utilities, third party testing/inspection/certification, etc.

4.2 Cost of material supplied by Railway or PSU to contractor.

4.3 Cost of land acquisition including cost for facilitating Land acquisition, Forest clearance, other clearances, crop/tree/Building compensation etc. for the project.

4.4 Miscellaneous cost like arbitration, court case, advertisement cost etc.

4.5 Any other expenditure incurred related to project at the instruction of Railway.

4.6 Cost of maintenance of the completed work (if required). No maintenance cost shall be payable if contractual conditions enjoin upon the contractor to maintain assets without any extra liability.

4.7 Railways shall, however, not make any payment for replacement of Defective/Nonstandard/Bad quality work.

5.0 Consolidated Management Fee:

5.1 Project Management Consultancy related to Project Management and / or Supervision cost (including salary, allowances etc. of PSU employees, regular or under contract) will form a part of the Consolidated Management Fee.

5.2 The PSU shall be paid an amount equivalent to accepted mark up on Detailed Estimate of project and maximum upto 1st Revised estimate of the project under various heads in para 4 above as Consolidated Management Fee, Except the items described in para 5.3.

After sanctioning of 1st revised estimate, any variation in amount of work which is beyond the control of PSU (like change in scope of work, by Railway, inflation in rates of constituent items etc.) would be paid to PSU, but no management fees would be paid on the variation amount.

5.3 Cost of Land acquisition/compensation, mandatory taxes, material supplied by the Railway, any payment made to Railway, advertisements, and Arbitration and Court cases shall be excluded from cost of project for payment of management fee.

6.0 Time of Completion & Bonus for early completion of work:

6.1 The completion period of the project will be decided by the Nodal Directorate of Railway Board as per the overall plan of Directorate and taking into consideration availability of land, forest clearance, utility shifting etc.

6.2 The extension in time of completion will be granted to the PSU on grounds as per Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract, Sep' 2019 with upto date correction slips. The liquidated damages for delay in completion shall be worked out on the total management fees and not on the project cost.

6.3 PSU shall incorporate the Annual Commissioning targets in the annual performance MOU signed by the PSUs with Railway Board taking into account the completion period of the project.

6.4 In case of Project cost more than Rs.20 Cr., when there is no reduction in original scope of work by more than 10%, and no extension granted, PSUs shall be entitled for a bonus of 1% of project management feesPART III—SEC. 1] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 22, 2020 (PHALGUNA 3, 1941) 327 for each 30 days early completion of work. The period of less than 30 days shall be ignored while working out bonus. The maximum bonus shall be limited to 3% of original total project management fees. The completion date shall be reckoned as the date of issuance of completion certificate by Zonal Railways.

7.0 Financial Control & funding of Project:

7.1 The PSU shall submit to Railway at each budgetary stage details of anticipated expenditure to enable provision/revision of budget allotment. Railway shall reimburse the expenditure directly to the PSU.

7.2 The PSU shall receive interest free advance amounting to 10% of the initial estimated cost of the project along with corresponding project management fee and applicable tax based on their demand. The PSU will subsequently receive a recoupable advance amounting to 20% of the cost of work for which work/supply/consultancy contracts are awarded by it.

7.3 Phasing of work and milestones of execution would be clearly mentioned in MOU (to be signed between Zonal Railway & PSU) and payment would be given to PSU based on milestones, given in MOU.

8.0 Coordination and Assistance by Zonal Railways:

CAO/Con. for New line, GC and Doubling, PCEE for electrification and Traction related works, PSTE for signaling works, and PCME for Rolling Stock related works of the Zonal Railways will be the Nodal Officer for any project awarded to a PSU, and will be responsible for monitoring the project and coordinating the various clearances/approvals etc., so as to ensure timely completion of the work.

VINAY SRIVASTAVA

Executive Director (PSU)

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

(OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES)

FORM NO. STK-6

PUBLIC NOTICE

[Pursuant to sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 7 of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016]

In the matter of striking off or removal of names of following companies under section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, in respect of

Chandigarh, the 10th February 2020

No. 212 [No. STK-6/Sec. 248/212]—

Notice is hereby given that the Registrar of companies had received applications from the above mentioned companies under section 248(2) of the Companies act, 2013 for removal of its/their name(s) from the register of companies either on the ground that they have failed to commence business within one year of their incorporation or on the ground that the company(ies) is/are not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has/have not made any application(s) within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013 or the company(ies) have obtained the status of dormant company, but it/they not wish to continue its/their registration as companies and have, therefor, requested for removal/strike off of its/their names from the register of companies.

(2) Accordingly, the Registrar of Companies proposes to remove or strike off the names of the above mentioned companies from the Register of Companies.

(3) Any person objecting to the proposed removal or striking off of name of the companies from the register of companies may send his or her objection to the office address mentioned here above with thirty days from the date of publication of this notice.

SHYAM SUNDER Registrar of Companies Punjab and ChandigarhPART III—SEC. 1] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 22, 2020 (PHALGUNA 3, 1941) 339

FORM NO. STK- 6

PUBLIC NOTICE

[Pursuant to sub-section (2) and sub-section (4) of section 248 of the Companies Act,2013 and rule 7 of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies)Rules,2016]

In the matter of striking off or removal of names of following companies under section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of

Gwalior-474009, the 13th February 2020

No. 04 [No. ROC-G/STK-2/201/2072]—Notice is hereby given that the Registrar of Companies had received applications from the following companies under section 248(2) of the Companies Act,2013 for removal of its/their name(s) from the register of companies either on the ground that they have failed to commence business within one year of their incorporation or on the ground that the company (ies) is/are not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has/have not made any application(s) within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013 or the company(ies) have obtained the status of dormant company, but it/they do not wish to continue its/their registration as companies and have, therefore, requested for removal/strike off of its/their names from the register of companies.

(2) Accordingly, the Registrar of Companies proposes to remove or strike off the names of the following companies from the Register of Companies.

(3) Any person objecting to the proposed removal or striking off of name of the companies from the register of companies may send his or her objection to the office address mentioned here above within thirty days from the date of publication of this notice

RAJPAL SINGH Registrar of Companies Madhya Pradesh

——————

In the matter of LLP's Act 2009 and of the following LLP's

Gwalior-474009, the 13th February 2020

No. ROC-G/LLP-24/Publication/2019-20/2053—Notice is hereby given pursuant to Sub Rule 3 of Rule 37 of Limited Liability Partnership Rules, 2009 that name of the following Limited Liability Partnerships have this day been struck off from the register and the said Limited Liability Partnerships are dissolved:—

RAJPAL SINGH Registrar of Companies Madhya Pradesh

महाप्रबंधक, भारत सरकार मुद्रणालय, मिन्टो रोड, नई दिल्ली-110002 द्वारा अपलोड एवं प्रकाशन नियंत्रक, दिल्ली-110054 द्वारा ई-प्रकाशित UPLOADED BY GENERAL MANAGER, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS, MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI-110002 AND E-PUBLISHED BY THE CONTROLLER OF PUBLICATIONS, DELHI-110054