xxxGIDHxxx
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-19052020-219443
CG-DL-W-19052020-219443
xxxGIDExxx
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 8] नई दिल्ली, मई 3—मई 9, 2020, शनिवार/वैशाख 13— वैशाख 19, 1942
No. 8] NEW DELHI, MAY 3 — MAY 9, 2020, SATURDAY/VAISAKHA 13—VAISAKHA 19, 1942
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (iii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (iii)
के न्द्रीय अधिकारियों (संघ राज्यक्षेत्र प्रशासनों को छोड़कर) द्वारा जारी किए गए साधारण आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Orders and Notifications issued by the Central Authorities (Other than the Administrations of Union Territories) नई दिल्ली, 5 मई, 2020 .—लोक प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 (1951 का 43) की धारा 106 के अनुसरण में, भारत निर्वाचन आयोग 2019 की निर्वाचन याचिका संख्या 4 में इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय के दिनांक 12 फरवरी, 2020 के निर्णय को एतद््द्वारा प्रकाशित करता है ।
(निर्णय अधिसूचना के अंग्रेजी भाग में छपा है )
[सं. 82/उ0प्र0-लो0स0/4/2019(इला.)]
आदेश से,
अनुज जयपुरियार, वरिष्ठ प्रधान सचिव 70 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : MAY 9, 2020/VAISAKHA 19, 1942 [PART II—SEC. 3(iii)] ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA New Delhi, the 5th May, 2020 O. N. 23.—In pursuance of section 106 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission of India hereby publishes the Judgement dated 12th February, 2020 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Election Petition No. 4 of 2019.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ELECTION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2019
(Under Section 80, 84, 98 & 99 of Representation of the People Act 1951)
DISTRICT: MAU
Hari Narayan son of Bhagirathi
Resident of Village-Tangunia Post Chainpur
District-Ballia. ...... Election Petitioner.
Versus
Atul Kumar Singh son of Bharat Singh
Residence of Post Veer Pur, Vikas Khand Bhanwarkol
District Gazipur. Returned Candidate/Respondent.
….
Court No. - 29
Case :- ELECTION PETITION No. - 4 of 2019
Petitioner :- Hari Narayan
Respondent :- Atul Kumar Singh
Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Narayan ( In Person ), Sudist Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- Ajay Srivastava, Shiv Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal, J.
Heard Sri Sudist Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.B. Singh and Sri Ajay Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.
The petitioner is an unsuccessful candidate in the Parliamentary Elections, 2019 from 70 Ghosi Parliamentary Constituency. He has challenged the election of the respondent.
After the written statement was filed by the respondent and an application was moved to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C., petitioner was given time to file replica and reply to the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C., but till date there is no response from the side of the petitioner.
On the last occasion i.e. 08.01.2020, the matter was adjourned as Sri Sudist Kumar sought time of two weeks for filing replica and reply to the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. Earlier also, time in this regard was allowed to him.
Today, he submits that the petitioner is not responding and he is not receiving any instructions whatsoever from him so as to press this petition.
The fact that the counsel is not receiving instructions amply demonstrates that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Accordingly, the Court is left with no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
The Election Petition is, therefore, dismissed and is directed to be consigned to record.
Order Date :- 12.2.2020 Nirmal_Sinha
Sd/-
PANKAJ MITHAL, J.
[ No. 82/UP-HP/4/2019 (Alld.)] Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.