रजिस्ट्री सं. डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05
REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
xxxGIDHxxx
सी.जी.-डी.एल.-सा.-09042021-226465
CG-DL-W-09042021-226465
xxxGIDExxx
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्ताहिक
WEEKLY
सं. 13] नई दिल्ली, मार्च 28—अप्रैल 3, 2021 शनिवार/ चैत्र 7—चैत्र 13, 1943
No. 13] NEW DELHI, MARCH 28– APRIL 3, 2021, SATURDAY/ CHAITRA 7 – CHAITRA 13, 1943
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह पृथक संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मंत्रालयों (रक्षा मंत्रालय को छोड़कर) द्वारा जारी किए गए सांविधिक आदेश और अधिसूचनाएं Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India (Other than the Ministry of Defence)
कृ षि एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय
(कृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 31 मार्च, 2021
का.आ. 325.—के न्द्रीय सरकार, कृ षि एवं किसान कल्याण मंत्रालय, कृ षि अनुसंधान एवं शिक्षा विभाग, राजभाषा नियमावली 1976 के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में (1) भा.कृ .अ.प.- के न्द्रीय अंतस्र्थलीय मात्स्यिकी अनुसंधान संस्थान, क्षेत्रीय कें द्र, हरनी रोड, वड़ोदरा, गुजरात और (2) भारतीय पशु चिकित्सा अनुसंधान, क्षेत्रीय के न्द्र, मुक्तेश्वर, जिला नैनीताल, उत्तराखंड को, जिसमें 80 प्रतिशत से अधिक अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, एतदद्वारा अधिसूचित करता है।
[फा. सं. 13-05/2020-हिंदी/182-12]
एस. के . उपाध्याय, अवर सचिव
1719 GI/2021
(761) जल शक्ति मंत्रालय
का.आ. 326.—के न्द्रीय सरकार, राजभाषा (संघ के शासकीय प्रयोजनों के लिए प्रयोग) नियम, 1976 (यथा संशोधित 1987) के नियम 10 के उपनियम (4) के अनुसरण में के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, दिल्ली तथा वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, गुरूग्राम के निम्नलिखित कार्यालयों को, जिनके 80% कर्मचारी वृन्द ने हिन्दी का कार्यसाधक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर लिया है, को एतद् द्वारा अधिसूचित करती है:-
के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, दिल्ली
1. जल विज्ञानीय प्रेक्षण परिमंडल, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, भुवनेश्वर
2. पूर्वी नदियां मंडल, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, भुवनेश्वर
3. निचली कृ ष्णा उप मंडल-।।, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, विजयवाड़ा
4. मध्य कृ ष्णा, उपमंडल-।।, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, कनू र्ल,
5. निचली तु ंगभद्रा उप मंडल, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, कनू र्ल
6. उप मंडल अभियंता कार्यालय, निचली कृ ष्णा उप मंडल-।, नागाजु र्नसागर बांध., के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, तेलंगाना
7. उप मंडल अभियंता कार्यालय, निचली गोदावरी उप मंडल-।।, के न्द्रीय जल आयोग, राजामुन्द्री वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, गुरूग्राम
1. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, हैदराबाद
2. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, बेंगलुरू
3. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, कोलकाता
4. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, अहमदाबाद
5. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, गांधी नगर
6. वाप्कोस लिमिटेड, परियोजना कार्यालय, भुवनेश्वर
[फा. सं. ई-11011/1/2021-हिन्दी/1492-1592]
डॉ. आर. सतीश, आर्थिक सलाहकार एवं राजभाषा प्रभारी [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/चैत्र 13, 1943 763
JAL SHAKTI MINISTRY
(Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvention)
New Delhi, the 23rd March, 2021
S.O. 326.—In Pursuance of Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for official purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies the following office of Central Water Commission, Delhi and WAPCOS Limited, Gurugram, wherein more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi:
Central Water Commission, Delhi
1. Hydrological Obsevation Circle, Central Water Commission, Bhubaneswar
2. Eastern Rivers Division, Central Water Commission, Bhubaneswar
3. Lower Krishna Sub-Division-II, K.G.B.O, Central Water Commission, Vijayawada
4. Middle Krishna Sub-Division-II, Central Water Commission, Kurnool
5. Lower Tungabhadra Sub-Division-I, Central Water Commission, Kurnool
6. Sub Divisional Engineer Office Lower, Krishna Sub-Division-I, Kurnool K.G.B.O, Central Water Commission, Miyalguda, Hyderabad
7. Sub Divisional Engineer Office, Lower Godavari Sub-Division-II, Central Water Commission, Rajahmundry,
WAPCOS Limited, Gurugram
1. WAPCOS Limited, Hyderabad.
2. WAPCOS Limited, Bengaluru
3. WAPCOS Limited, Kolkata
4. WAPCOS Limited, Ahmadabad
5. WAPCOS Limited, Gandhi Nagar
6. WAPCOS Limited, Project Office, Bhubaneswar
[F. No. E.11011/1/2021-Hindi/1492-1592] Dr. R. SATHISH, Economic Advisor & Official Language Incharge
श्रम और रोजगार मंत्रालय
नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2021
का.आ. 327.—राष्ट्रपति, श्री श्याम सु ंदर गर्ग, पीठासीन अधिकारी, के न्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण
सह श्रम न्यायालय, नागपुर को सौंपे गए के न्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण सह श्रम न्यायालय, सं. 2, मु ंबई के
पीठासीन अधिकारी के अतिरिक्त प्रभार की अवधि दिनांक 19.04.2021 से छ: माह तक अथवा पद पर नियमित
नियुक्ति तक अथवा अगले आदेशो तक, इनमें जो भी पहले हो तक बढ़ाते है ।
[सं. अ-11016/02/2019-सीएलएस-II]
सतीश चन्दर, अवर सचिव
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 1st April, 2021
S.O. 327.—The President is pleased to extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.2, Mumbai entrusted to Shri Shyam Sunder Garg, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Nagpur for a further period of six months with effect from 19.04.2021, or till the regular appointment to the post, or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[No. A-11016/02/2019-CLS-II]
SATISH CHANDER, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2021
—औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब एण्ड सिंध बैंक के प्रबंधतत्र, संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकारों के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय, जबलपुर के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 40/2007) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01.04.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/57/2006-आई आर (बी-II)]
सीमा बंसल, अनुभाग अधिकारी
[भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/चैत्र 13, 1943 765
appropriate Government. According to the workman, his dis-engagement was violative of Section 25(F), 25(G) and Section 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as the word 'Act". Thus the workman has prayed for his reinstatement with all back wages, setting aside his dis-engagement.
4. The case of the Management Bank is that the applicant formally never applied for any job under the Bank. No appointment letter was issued to him. No Rules or procedure was followed in his recruitment. In fact, he was engaged on daily basis as a casual labour in the Branch for some hours in a day as a Water-Man purely on the basis of need. He was free not to come next day. He was engaged only for the working days and no wages for holidays was paid to him. Under the Policy of the Bank, he was dis-engaged. His dis-engagement is not covered in Industrial Disputes Act,1947. He did get a chance to be absorbed under the Bank Scheme but could not succeed. He never worked continuously for 240 days at any time in the year, preceding the date of his dis-engagement.
5. In his rejoinder, the workman has mainly reiterated his claim.
6. The workman has filed documents, experience certificate by Bank dated 25-1-1993, letter of Bank dated 30-12-1992, details of date wise payment, reply of bank filed before the Conciliation Officer and has proved it as Exhibit W-1 to Exhibit W-4 respectively. The workman has examined himself on oath. He has further filed and proved applications filed in Bank which are Exhibits W-5, W-6 and W-7. The Management has examined its witness Vishram Kashyap, Senior Manager.
7. At the stage of arguments, none appeared. Parties were granted liberty to file written arguments. The workman did file written arguments. No written arguments was filed by the Management Bank.
8. In his written arguments also the workman has mainly reiterated his case.
9. I have gone through the records as well.
10. Before proceeding into the merits of the case, some legal and relevant provisions as Section 2(oo), Section 25(B), Section 25(F), Section (G), Section 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 ,requires to be reproduced here:-
2[(oo) "retrenchment" means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for
any any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary
action, but does not include— (a) voluntary retirement of the workman; or (b) retirement of the
workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the
employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf;
Section 25 B:-
Definition of continuous service.-
(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorised leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman; (2) where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer- (a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case; (b) for a period of six months, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than- (i) ninety-five days, in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and (ii) one hundred and twenty days, in any other case.
25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No workman employed in any industry
who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be
retrenched by that employer until- (a) the workman has been given one month's notice in
writing indicating the reasons for retrenchment and the period of notice has expired, or the
workman has been paid in lieu of such notice, wages for the period of the notice: 1[***] (b) the
workman has been paid, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to
fifteen days' average pay 2[for every completed year of continuous service] or any part thereof in
excess of six months; and (c) notice in the prescribed manner is served on the appropriate
नई दिल्ली, 1 अप्रैल, 2021
.—औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 (1947 का 14) की धारा 17 के अनुसरण में केन्द्रीय सरकार पंजाब नेशनल बैंक के प्रबंधतंत्र, संबद्ध नियोजकों और उनके कर्मकाराें के बीच अनुबंध में निर्दिष्ट औद्योगिक विवाद में केन्द्रीय सरकार औद्योगिक अधिकरण/श्रम न्यायालय सं. 2, नई दिल्ली के पंचाट (संदर्भ सं. 23/2009) को प्रकाशित करती है जो केन्द्रीय सरकार को 01.04.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ था।
[सं. एल-12012/94/2008-आई आर (बी-II)] [भाग II—खण्ड 3(ii)] भारत का राजपत्र : अप्रैल 3, 2021/चैत्र 13, 1943 767
New Delhi, the 1st April, 2021
S.O. 329.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 23/2009) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No. 2, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of Punjab National Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 01.04.2021.
[No. L-12012/94/2008-IR(B-II)]
SEEMA BANSAL, Section Officer
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi.
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 23/2009
Date of Passing Award- 1st March, 2021
Between:
Shri Bhavish Kumar Kalra, 196, 2nd Floor, Old Gupta colony, New Vijay Nagar, Delhi-110009.
… Claimant
Versus
The General Manager Punjab National Bank 7, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi- 110066.
… Management
Appearances:-
None for the claimant (A/R) : For the claimant
Shri Rajat Arora (A/R) : For the Management
AWARD
The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute existing between employer i.e. the management of M/s Punjab National Bank, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause (d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No. L-12012/94/2008 (IR(B-II) dated 03/03/2009 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.
"Whether the action of the management of Punjab National Bank i.e. Dy. Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, North Delhi, New Delhi in dismissing the workman Shri B.K. Kalra, ex-special Assistant from service without notice, is just, fair and legal? What relief the concerned workmen is entitled to?"
This is a reference received from the Appropriate Government to adjudicate whether the action of the management of PNB in dismissing the workman B.K Kalra ex special assistant from service without notice is just fair and legal. To what relief the concerned workman is entitled to.
The claimant filed a claim statement stating therein that he was working with the management Bank as a Special Assistant. On 09.03.1998 he was placed under suspension and at that time he was posted as a special assistant at branch office Shashtri Nagar New Delhi. Thereafter charge sheet was issued and inquiry was initiated. The departmental inquiry was conducted ignoring the Principles of Natural Justice and at the end of the inquiry he was found guilty of charges i.e. his indulgence in speculated transaction and share business. On the basis of the inquiry report the disciplinary authority passed an order dismissing him from service. Though appeal was filed the same was rejected too.
The claimant raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner where the conciliation proceeding was initiated. The conciliation since, failed the appropriate government referred the matter for adjudication.
Notice being served the management Bank appeared and filed written statement denying the allegation made by the claimant. While filing the proceeding of the domestic inquiry and the orders passed therein the Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.