Chandigarh Gazette, No. 56, 06 May 2026

click here for IIIF manifest

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Chandigarh Administration Gazette

Pub lishe d b y Authority

No. 056] CHANDIGARH, WEDNESDAY, MAY 06, 2026 (VAISAKHA 16, 1948 SAKA) BAR COUNCIL OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH

Notification

The 5th May, 2026

In compliance of order dated 4th May, 2026, passed by the Hon'ble Chairman, Bar Council of India, New Delhi directed to the State Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana to publication / notification of the names of the Elected Members of the State Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, in the official Gazette.

In pursuance of Rule 33 of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana Election Rules, 1968 framed by the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana under section 15(2)(a) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 and approved by the Bar Council of India, it is hereby notified that the following twenty-three Advocates have been duly elected as Members of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana under Section 3 (2) (b) of the said Act the Election held on the 17th and 18th March, 2026 and declaration of result on 29.04.2026 by the Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jaishree Thakur, (Retd) Judge, Punjab and Haryana High Court and Returning Officer, Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh and verified by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjit Singh, (Retd), Judge, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, Chairperson High Powered Election Committee Phase III-C, appointed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India , vide order dated 18.11.2025

Note;-In view of order dated 8.12.2025, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in WP(s) (Civil) No.(s) 581/2024, titled as Yogamaya M.G. V/s Union of India & Ors, two women advocates are to be co- opted as Member Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

(Sd.) . . .,

PRAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN

Advocate General Haryana ChandigarhThis is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) 577

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Notification

The 30th April, 2026

No. 642074-HII(2)-2026/4587.—In exercise of the Powers conferred by sub-section (i) of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act No. 14 of 1947) read with Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment's Notification No. S-11025/21/2003-IR(PL) dated 28.7.2004, the undersigned hereby publish the following award bearing reference No. 56/2023 dated 25.03.2026 delivered by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, UT Chandigarh between:

RESHAM KUMARI, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF SH. BHOLLA PANDIT, CURRENTLY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 428-K, NEAR RAVIDASS MANDIR, HALLOMAJRA – 160002, CHANDIGARH. PERMANENT ADDRESS: VILLAGE SIRMROUR, POST NEKPUR, THANA NIMCHAK BATHANI, SINGHAUL, GAYA – 803116, BIHAR. (WORKMAN)

AND

1. M/S FANCY PRINTERS (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. KULDEEP MAHAJAN), ADDRESS: PLOT NO. 945, PHASE – 2, RAMDARBAR, CHANDIGARH – 160002.

2. SH. KULDEEP MAHAJAN (PROPRIETOR OF M/S FANCY PRINTERS), ADDRESS:

PLOT NO. 945, PHASE – 2, RAMDARBAR, CHANDIGARH - 160002. (MANAGEMENT)

AWARD

1. Workman Resham Kumari has presented Industrial Dispute in hand under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (here-in-after in short called 'ID Act').

2. Briefly stated the averments of claim statement are that the workman was appointed by the management of M/s Fancy Printers as Helper in the month of June, 2011 and work allotted to her was to operate the printing machine. She is a 'workman' as defined under Section 2(s) of the ID Act. Her work was controlled, supervised and assessed by the management. The personal file and record of leave etc. was also maintained by management No. 2. She was paid ` 6,800/- monthly wages in cash,which were less than the minimum wages fixed by the Labour Department and ESI & other labourwelfare schemes were not provided. On 2nd May, 2022, Management No.2 requested the workman along with one old employee namely Gudia Devi @ Usha Rani that his son has set up a new factory in the name of Fancy Confinersat Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar Mohali and there was an urgent need of skilled labourto operate the machines and she was required to work there for 2-3 months and they will release her salary. She was told that his son would take her to Dera Bassi factory and her salary will be increased. It is stated that on 27th August, 2022, the workman and another employee marked their attendance before the management and Mr. Vipul Mahajan, son of respondent No.2 transported them to DeraBassi factory. At around 5:30 P.M., while operating the press machine, left hand of the workman was accidently severely injured and she was immediately taken to Jeevan Jyoti Hospital at Dera Bassi by Vipul Mahajan and admitted there till 11:00 P.M. and the surgery was conducted on the left thumb and the index finger and thumb length of the workman has been reduced. It is stated that at the time of discharge from hospital, management No.2 told the workman to take 15 days off and take rest and get medicines from the hospital. On 16th September, 2022, she went to the factory of management No.1 and met with management No.2 and requested to release her salary for the month of August and some payment for diet and medicine but her services were terminated abruptly& illegally without following procedure of law. It is stated that her conduct while in service was satisfactory. Neither any notice or any charge sheet was ever served nor any inquiry was conducted against the workman. WhileThis is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in 578 CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) terminating her services, the management has not given full & final including notice pay, retrenchment compensation, leave encashment, bonus of last financial year and compensation for accident. It is stated that she had completed 240 days in 12 calendar months preceding her termination. She submitted demand notice to the management and the Conciliation Officer initiated conciliation proceedings but ultimately, the conciliation proceeding failed and the Conciliation Officer advised the workman vide Memo No.424 dated 09.02.2023 to refer under Section 2A of the ID Act. It is prayed that her termination may be declared illegal and she may be reinstated in service with continuity of service, full back wages and other consequential benefits.

3. Management No.1 & 2 contested the case of the workman and filed written statement submitting that the management had no printing machine at Fancy Printers, 945, Industrial Area, Phase – II, Ram Darbar, Chandigarh and the management had stopped the production / manufacturing of corrugated box since 31.03.2022 due to poor health issues. Resham Kumari was working as Helper and she had left the work on 30.04.2022 and thereafter she was not an employee of management. A prayer was made for dismissal of the claim statement.

4. The workman filed rejoinderto the written statement wherein it is denied that she had left the work on 30.04.2022. It is submitted that she joined as Helper but she was allotted the work of machine operator and she was illegally terminated on 16.09.2022.

5. From the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed vide order dated 06.12.2023 :-

1. Whether the termination of the services of the workman is illegal ? If so, to what effect and what relief she is entitled to ?OPW

2. Relief.

6. Thereafter, both the parties were called upon to lead their respective evidence.

7. In evidence of the workman, Workman Resham Kumari herself appeared as AW1 and tendered her affidavit Exhibit 'AW1/A'. She also tendered into evidence documents :-

Demand notice dated 07.11.2022 submitted before Exhibit 'W1' Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, U.T. Chandigarh

Postal receipts dated 07.11.2022 of demand notice sent Exhibit 'W2' to the management

Failure report bearing Memo No.424 dated 09.02.2023 Exhibit 'W3' of Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, U.T. Chandigarh

8. The workman also examined summoned witness Prem Sagar – Labour Inspector, O/o Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, U.T. Chandigarh as AW2, who brought on record Downloaded copy of order dated 29.02.2024 in COMA 456-2024 passed by Dr. Aman Inder Singh, CJM, Chandigarh Exhibit 'AW2/1' and deposed that complaint was pertaining to violation of Section 13 of the Punjab Shops & Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 i.e. non-registration of establishment in which the Proprietor of Fancy Printers pleaded guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of ` 25,000/- by the Learned CJM, Chandigarh and he paid the fine as per order of the Court dated 29.02.2024.

9. The workman further examined Sukhjeet Singh – Clerk, O/o Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, U.T. Chandigarh as AW3, who brought the summoned record i.e.

Copy of demand notice dated 07.11.2022 Exhibit AW3/1'This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) 579 Copy of notices dated 14.11.2022 and 19.01.2023 Exhibit 'AW3/2' issued by the Department of ALC, Sector 30, & Exhibit 'AW3/3' Chandigarh to the management

Copy of reply dated 23.11.2022 filed by the management Exhibit 'AW3/4' Copy of zimni orders w.e.f. 22.11.2022 to 03.02.2023 Exhibit 'AW3/5' Failure report bearing Memo No.424 dated 09.02.2023 Exhibit 'AW3/6' of Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum-Conciliation Officer, U.T. Chandigarh

AW3 deposed that as per office record, the management has not submitted any return / compliance nor obtained under the Payment of Wages Act and Bonus Act, Punjab Labour Welfare Fund Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, Factory Fact, Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, the Minimum Wage Act, the Workman Compensation Act, Maternity Benefits Act, Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace.

10. Thereafter, Learned Representative for the workman closed the evidence on behalf of the workman in affirmative.

11. In evidence of the management, Kuldeep Kumar Mahajan appeared as MW1 and tendered his duly sworn-in affidavit Exhibit 'MW1/A'. Thereafter, the Learned Representative for management No.1 & 2 closed the evidence on behalf of management No.1 & 2.

12. I have heard the arguments addressed by Learned Representatives for the parties and gone through the case file carefully with their able assistance. My issue-wise findings are as under :-

Issue No. 1

13. The workman was required to prove the said issue.

14. Learned Representative for the workman submitted that the workman had worked with the respondent-management w.e.f. June, 2021 to 16.09.2022 as Helper and allotted the work to operate the printing machine, however, her services were terminated abruptly without any notice, charge sheet and holding any domestic inquiry and she had completed 240 days in 12 calendar months preceding her termination. Therefore, she is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

15. On the other hand, Learned Representative for management No. 1 & 2 submitted that the workman was employed with Fancy Confiners and not with respondent-management No.1 & 2and her services were never terminated by management NO.1 & 2. She had left the work of management No.1 & 2 on 30.04.2022, therefore, she was not entitled to claim any relief from respondent No.1 & 2.

16. However, before coming to any logical conclusion, it is necessary to discuss the evidence led by both the parties.

17. The workman vide her affidavit Exhibit 'AW1/A' deposed that she was appointed as Helper in June, 2021. She was allotted the work pertaining to operation of printing machine. Her entire record pertaining to personal file, leave etc. was maintained by respondent-management No.2. She was paid monthly salary of ` 6,800/-. She deposed that on 2nd May, 2022, she along with co-employee Gudia Devi was told by respondent-management No.2 that his son namely Vipul Mahajan had set up a new factory with the name of Fancy Confiners at Dera Bassi and required some skilled workers to operate the machine and workman was required there for two-three months. She deposed that on 27th August, 2022, the workman along with co-worker was transported to Dera Bassi factory by son of respondent-management No.2 and on the said date at around 5:30 P.M. her left hand was accidently injured and she was taken to the hospital for treatment and she was discharged on the same day after surgery was conducted on the left thumb. On 16th September, 2022, when she went to factory of management No.1 for work and met with respondent-This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in 580 CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) management No.2, the respondents terminated her service abruptly without following due procedure of law. She had completed 240 days in a calendar year preceding her date of termination. Her termination is in violation of provisions of the ID Act. She served the demand notice but no conciliation took place and she was advised to approach this forum.

18. AW2 Prem Sagar – Labour Inspector and AW3 Sukhjit Singh – Clerk of Office of Assistant Labour Commissioner brought the summoned record.

19. On the other hand, MW1 Kuldeep Kumar Mahajan deposed that the workman had not approached the Court with clean hands. She had concealed the material facts from the Court. She has no locus standi to file present case against the managements. She was not a regular employee of the management and used to work with management as per her convenience. She had no concern with any machines deployed in the premises of the management rather she had worked with the management up to 30.04.2022 though her working was not continuous. She had tried to extort money from the management by filing multiple cases and complaints before the concerned authorities. No cause of action has arisen in favour of the workman at any point of time.

20. It transpires from the record that the workman has submitted that she was appointed by the management of respondent-management No.1 as Helper in the month of June, 2021 and thereafter w.e.f. 2nd May, 2022 she started working at Fancy Confiners, Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar. The management in oral evidence admitted that the claimant was working with management No.1 & 2 i.e. Fancy Printers. As such, it has been established that the workman had worked with management No.1 & 2.

21. The workman vide her oral testimony stated that her services were terminated abruptly and illegally on 16th September, 2022 without following any procedure of law. She deposed that she had suffered injury on her left hand and the surgery was conducted on the left thumb on 27th August, 2022 and thereafter she went to work on 16th September, 2022. However, the management submitted that the workman had worked with management No.1 & 2 till 30.04.2022 and she had never worked continuously with them.

22. Learned Representative for the management submitted that the workman had left the services with Fancy Printers and therefore, there was no reason to terminate the services as averred by her. The workman during her cross-examination stated that she was working with Fancy Confiners at Dera Bassi where she met with an accident on 28th August. She stated that she filed claim statement against 'M/s Fancy Confiners' and at the time of accident, she was rushed to hospital by Mr. Vipul Mahajan and the expenses incurred on her medical treatment were borne by Vipul Mahajan.

23. Learned Representative for the workman submitted that the workman had worked with Fancy Printers and her services were terminated without any reason. Admittedly, the services of the workman were terminated while she was working with Fancy Confiners. Moreover, it is the pleadings of the workman herself that after 2nd May, 2022, she used to work at Dera Bassi in the factory under the name & style of 'Fancy Confiners' set up by Vipul Mahajan S/o Kuldeep Mahajan.

24. It transpires from the record that the management has moved the application dated 08.08.2024 for placing on record copy of registration certificate bearing No.04AAQPK3060N1ZG in the legal name Kuldeep Kumar, Trade Name Fancy Printers issued on 21.09.2017, copy of letter dated 26.09.2023 issued to Member Secretary, Chandigarh Pollution Control Committee on the letter pad of Fancy Printers and copy of another registration certificate bearing registration No.03ALZPM8193Q1ZU legal name Rajni Mahajan, Trade name Fancy Confiners issued on 12.09.2021 and the said documents were produced on record by the management. A perusal of the said documents reveal that Kuldeep Kumar was the Proprietor of Fancy Printers and Rajni Mahajan was the Proprietor of Fancy Confiners. The workman has admitted that she was working for M/s Fancy Confiners at Dera Bassi where she met with an accident and she filed the present case against the Fancy Confiners. However, the said Fancy Confiners has not been arrayed as respondent-This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) 581 management by the workman. The Fancy Confiners was the necessary party to the present claim statement as it is the case of the workman herself that she met with an accident while working with Fancy Confiners. No reason has been putforth for not impleading Fancy Confiners as the party to the claim statement. The documents on record establish that M/s Fancy Printers and Fancy Confiners are different establishments and the workman has not been able to rebut the same.

25. Learned Representative for the workman further submitted that the workman had performed her duties with M/s Fancy Printers and MW1 in his oral testimony has admitted that the workman has filed the case No.APW/39/2022 for non-payment of wages for the month of August, 2022 before the concerned Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, wherein he paid ` 15,045/- as per the order of concerned Authority in the month of November, 2025 (Exhibit 'W4'). The document (Exhibit 'W4') has been addressed from the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act to M/s Fancy Printers as well as to Shri Kuldip Mahajan on the subject 'intimation of order dated 28.11.2025 in case No.APW/39/2022 tilted as Smt. Resham Kumari v/s Fancy Printers, Chandigarh'wherein it has been mentioned that the order in the subject mentioned case has been passed on 28.11.2025 vide which the management was directed to deposit an amount of ` 15,045/- before the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, U.T. Chandigarh within a period of 30 days of the order. However, the said intimation (Exhibit 'W4') does not mention that the amount of ` 15,045/- pertained to payment of wages to the workman for the month of August, 2022. The order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act has not been produced on record by the workman in support of the contention of the workman that the workman was actually working with management in the month of August, 2022.

26. Learned Representative for the workman further submitted that Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh has sentenced the Proprietor of Fancy Printers to pay fine of ` 25,000/- on 29.02.2024. He submitted that that the said fact clearly shows that the respondent establishment has not yet been closed. The fine has been ordered pertaining to complaint for the violation of Punjab Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 and the same has no relation with the impugned order of termination of the workman. The workman has failed to lead any cogent and convincing evidence to establish that her services were terminated by management No.1 & 2. Accordingly, the said issue stands decided against the workman and in favour of the management.

Relief

27. In view of the aforesaid findings, the industrial dispute in hand stands declined. Appropriate Government be informed accordingly. File be consigned to records after due compliance.

(Sd.) . . .,

Dated : March 25, 2023

(MANISHA JAIN) UID No. PB0158 PRESIDING OFFICER, Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Union Territory, Chandigarh.

_____________

Secretary Labour, Chandigarh Administration.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Notification

The 5th May, 2026

No79 /V.A.4.—Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to make the following appointments to the post of Reader (Legal) in the Pay Scale of ` 47,600/- of Pay Matrix of 7th Central Pay Commission, as made applicable by the Government of Punjab for the fresh recruitment/appointment on or after 17.07.2020, duly adopted by this Hon'ble Court, plus all such allowances as admissible from time to time on the establishment of this Hon'ble Court :-

Note:

1. That selected candidates shall be paid minimum wages fixed by the Deputy Commissioner Chandigarh during the probation period, in terms of letter No. 7/204/2012-4F.P.1/1049 dated 21.12.2015 of the Under Secretary, Government of Punjab, Department of Finance, (Finance Personnel-I Branch), Chandigarh. The period of probation, including the extended period of probation, if any, will not be counted (in service tenure) in the time scale of pay, If they are having any lien on any post then during the period of probation of new post, they will be entitled to receive the pay of previous post on which they are having a lien, in terms of letter No. 7/204/2012- 4F.P.1/66 dated 15.01.2015 of Government of Punjab.

2. That your appointment on the above said post will be subject to probation in terms of Rule 23(1) of High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1973.

3. That after successful completion of the probation period of one year or extended period (if any) as prescribed in High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1973, he/she shall be paid minimum of the level of Pay Matrix of the post plus all such allowances as may be admissible from time to time.

4. The above appointment is subject to furnishing of an affidavit/undertaking regarding factum of previous employment if any, and particulars of own 'close relatives' i.e. husband, wife, father, father-in law, mother, mother-in-law, son, son-in-law, daughter, daughter-in-law, brother,This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) 583 brother-in-law, sister and sister-in-law, who are already working in the Hon'ble High Court and/or Subordinate Courts in the States of Punjab, Haryana and U.T., Chandigarh and in the event of any information found to be incorrect/ false or some material fact is found to have been concealed or suppressed in respect of any of the appointees, at any stage, his/her selection/appointment will liable to be cancelled/ terminated.

5. The above appointment is also subject to production of original certificates in support of his/her qualifications, experience (if any) and date of birth etc. which may be asked to produce in the Hon'ble High Court at any time for verification thereof.

6. The inter se seniority of Reader (Legal) will be determined in accordance with the provisions contained in High Court Establishment (Appointment & Conditions of Service) Rules, 1973 as amended from time to time.

7. The selected candidates shall furnish his/her willingness/joining report as Reader (Legal) to the Establishment-I Branch, immediately along with aforesaid affidavit/undertaking, duly attested by Notary Public/Oath Commissioner.

BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

(Sd) . . .,

(ASHISH KUMAR BANSAL)

Registrar (Administration) for Registrar GeneralThis is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in 584 CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA)

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Luxmi W/o Narinder Kumar House No. 465, Village DMC Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Baby two of Laxmi to Kavyansh Gautam.

[1268-1]

I, Seth Singh S/o Sultan Singh R/o House No. 1524, Sector 33-D, Chandigarh, have changed my name from Seth Singh to Seth Singh Rawat.

[1269-1]

I, Nasima Khatoon W/o Mohd. Mujahid R/o House No. 621, Sector 52, Kajheri Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from MD Asad to Mohd. Asad.

[1270-1]

I, Ramanand S/o Ram Khilawan R/o 43, Mauli Jagran Colony Chnadigarh, have changed my name from Ramanand to Ram Anand.

[1271-1]

I, Duni Lal S/o Birja R/o # 4923/1, Sector 38 west Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Baby Three of Bisva to Abhishek.

[1272-1]

I, Balbir Singh Pathania S/o Uttam Singh, House No. 320, Sector 15-A, Chandigarh, have changed my name from Balbir Singh to Pathania to Balbir Singh.

[1273-1]

I, Mohd Arsh S/o Mohd Masuk, House No. 3660, Maloya Colony, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Jaid to Mohd Zaid.

[1274-1]

I, Shahna Begam W/o Mohd Ahmed, House No. 1492, Burail, Chandigarh, have changed my name to Sahan Begam.

[1275-1]

I, Balkaran Jeet Son of Sh. Ram Saran, Resident of # 700, Mohalla Gurudwara dera Sahib, Manimajra, I have changed the name of my minor daughter from Vandana to Vandana Chauhan. [1276-1]

I, Sanjeev Kumar S/o Guljari Lal, House No. 5264/2, Modern housing Complex, Manimajra Chandigarh, have changed my minor daughter name from Dineshatha to Dhanishta.

[1277-1]

I, Bablu Mistri S/o Hari Mistri R/o House No. 452, Mauli Jagran Chandigarh, have changed my name from Bablu Mistri to Bablu Sharma.

[1278-1]

I, Neeraj Pal Singh S/o Raghbir Singh R/o House No. 1080, Sector 40-B, Chandigarh, have changed my name to Kuwar Pal Singh.

[1279-1]

I, Jaleshwari W/o Sonu, House No. 370-B, Mauli Jagran, Chandigarh, have changed my name from Jaleshwari to Jaleshari.

[1280-1]

I, Keshav s/o Kamal Kumar R/o House No. 2383, Sector 52, Chandigarh, have changed my name to Keshav mehra.

[1281-1]

I, Bishnu Belbase S/o Sh. Nimananda Belbase R/o H. No. 1174, Sector 19-B, Chandigarh, changed my name Bishnu Belbase to Bishnu Prasad Belbase.

[1282-1]This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) 585 I, Narinder Pal Singh S/o Darshan singh Hora R/o House No. 103, Shivalik Enclave Manimajra Chandigarh, have changed my name from Narinder Pal Singh to Narinder Pal Singh Hora.

[1283-1]

I, Seema Rani W/o Ranjit Singh House No. 3358, Ground Floor, Sector 45-D, Chandigarh, have changed my name from seema Rani to Seema.

[1284-1]

I, Puja Bhasin D/o Gurdial Bhasin R/o House No. 122, Sector 18-A, Chandigarh, have changed my minor daughter name from Vanya Batra to Vanya Bhasin.

[1285-1]

I, Rahman Khan S/o Mohd. Anol R/o 172, Kajheri, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Mohammad Faran to Mohammad Ferhaan.

[1286-1]

I, Sheetal Singh S/o Hans Raj, House No. 1954-F, Sector 7-C, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Baby one of Dimpi Bohra to Ayaan Singh.

[1287-1]

I, Rahul Yadav S/o Ram Chander Yadav R/o # 796, Sector 25-D, Dainik Bhaskar, Chandigarh, declare that I have changed my minor's daughter name from Kaashvi Yadav to Adhisha Yadav. [1288-1]

I, Nur Fatima W/o Israr, House No. 1929, Burail, Sector 45, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Abdul Abdul to Abdul Muttalib.

[1289-1]

I, Pawan Kumar Singh S/o Kaushal Kishore Singh R/o # 2798, Sector 56, Chandigarh, have changed the name of my minor son from Shivaay Singh Rajput to Aadvik Singh Rajput.

[1290-1]

I, Sunil Kumar S/o Chhaju Ram R/o # 3046, Sector 41-D, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Baby Second of Bharti Aayush.

[1291-1]

I, Rajinder Parshad s/o Ayodhya Parshad R/o # 1 A type 3 GF PGI Campus, Sector 12, Chandigarh, I have changed my minor's son name from Baby one of Saruchi Rana to Hrithvik.

[1291-1]

I, Mamohmmad Ibran S/o Mansur Ali, House No. 865, Ramdarbar, Phase-2, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Baby three of Shahjha to Mohammed Aslam.

[1292-1]

I, D.P. Singh S/o late Sh. Manik Singh, R/o House No. 417, Sector 38 Chandigarh, have changed my name from D.P. Singh to Devender Pal Singh.

[1293-1]

I, Pankaj Sharma S/o Bhagwat Sharma R/o House No. 352, Village Mauli Jagran Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Ankit Kumar to Ankit Sharma.

[1294-1]

I, Jamila Khatun W/o Sakir Rain, House No. 725/12, Sector 26, Bapu Dham Colony, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Gulzar Alam to Gulzar Rain.

[1295-1]

I, Sugandha W/o Amit Sharma, House No. 3045, Sector 47-D, Chandigarh, have changed my name from Sugandha to Sugandha Sharma.

[1296-1]This is Digitally Signed Gazette. To verify, visit : https://egazette.chd.gov.in 586 CHD. ADMN GAZ. MAY 06, 2026 (VYSK. 16, 1948 SAKA) I, Jitendra Ram S/o Lakhichandra Ram, House No. 2046, Ground Floor, Sector 40-C, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Golu Kumar Ram to Golu Kumar.

[1297-1]

I, Paramjit Singh S/o Jagtar Singh R/o # 1028/1, Sector 45-B, Chandigarh, have changed my name to Paramjit Singh Lamey.

[1298-1]

I, Eknoor Kaur Sara D/o Inderpal Singh and W/o Partap Singh Gill R/o 158, Sector 8-A, Chandigarh, have changed my name to Eknoor Kaur Gill to after marriage.

[1299-1]

I, Krishan Kumar S/o Ganga Ram, House No. 4754, Maloya Chandigarh, have changed my minor daughter name from Baby one of Anju to Monika Kashyap.

[1300-1]

I, Balkaran Jeet Son of Sh. Ram Saran, Resident of # 700, Mohalla Gurudwara dera Sahib, Manimajra, I have changed the name of my minor son from Pulkit to Pulkit Chauhan.

[1301-1]

I, Seth Singh Rawat S/o Sultan Singh Rawat R/o House No. 1524, Sector 33-D, Chandigarh, have changed my minor son name from Pawan Kumar Rawat to Pawan Singh Rawat.

[1302-1]

"No legal responsibility is accepted for the contents of publication of advertisements/public notices in this part of the

Chandigarh Administration Gazette. Persons notifying the advertisements/ public notices will remain solely, responsible for

the legal consequences and also for any other misrepresentation etc. "

056—Ptg. & Sty. Deptt., U.T., Chd.