Servants of Knowledge
Extraordinary Gazette of India · Government of India

Subject NOT available

Published 28 October 1964

Ministry
Ministry NOT available
Type
Extra Ordinary
Download
GV_Content_Detail$ctl03$lnkflname_Pdf_Img
Gazetteid
E-1827-1964-0269-82953
Identifier
in.gazette.csl_extraordinary.1964-10-28.E-1827-1964-0269-82953
Languages
English, Hindi
Published at
Original source ↗

click here for IIIF manifest

REGISTERED No. D. 221

The Gazette of India

EXTRAORDINARY

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

No. 269] NEW DELHI, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1964/KARTIKA 6, 1886

Separate paging is given to this part in order that it may be filed

as a separate compilation

MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 28th October 1964

S.O. 3795.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Travancore Titanium Products Limited, Trivandrum and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And, whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the •aid dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7A and clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal of which Shri K. Purushothaman Nair, Industrial Tribunal, Trivandrum. Kerala State shall be the Presiding Officer with headquarters at Trivandrum, and refers the said dispute for adjudication to the said Industrial Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the present rate of fixed and variable Dearness Allowance is adequate, if not to what extent these should be increased?

(2) Whether any conveyance and House Rent allowance should be paid to the workmen, if so, what should be the quantum of conveyance and House Rent Allowance?

(3) To what extent and for what particular types of work should casual labour be employed for the efficient and economical functioning of the factory?

(4) To what extent employment of contract labour should be minimised, keeping in view the efficient, economical and expeditious production in the factory?

(5) Whether denial of promotion to the following persons is justified, if not, to what relief are they entitled?

1. Shri P. Kumaran Nair W/No. 60 2. Shri B. Dass W/No. 150 3. Shri N. Kuttan Filial W/No. 114 4. Shri A. V. Edwards W/No. 110 5. Shri K. Madhavan W/No. VB 6. Shri P. Madhavan W/No. 35 (1029 ) IO3O THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY \Fjwr II-SKO. 3(11)]
       7.  Shri  V.  Sudarsanan                                       W/No.  221
       8.  Shri  Aliarkunju                                           W/No.  80
       9.  Shri  N.  Krishnan  Nair                                   W/No.  524
      10.  Shri  N.  Sivasankara  Pillai                              W/No.  B27
      11.  Shri  N.  Sivarama  Pillai                                W/No.  541
      12.  Shri  G.  Gangadharan  Nair                                W/No.  642
      13.  Shri  Mani  V.  Mathew                                    W/No.  550
      14.  Shri  K.  Sreedharan  Nair                                 W/No.  656
      15.  Shri  D.  J.  Stephen                                     W/No.  566
      16.  Shri  K.  Sankaramoorthy                                   W/No.  56S
     17.  Shri  K.  Gopinathan  Nair                                 W/No.  303.
                                                                   [No.  24/6/64-LRL]
   8.O.  3796.—Whereas  by  an  Order  of  the  Government  of  India  in  the  Ministry
of  Labour  and  Employment  No.  24/6/64-LRI,  dated  the  28th  October,  1964,  an
Industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Travancore  Titanium
Produ  ts  Limited,  Trivandium  end  their  workmen      has  been  referred   to  the
Industrial  Tribunal,  Trivand/um.
   Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-section  (3)  of
section  10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14  of  1947),  the  Central  Govern-
ment  hereby  prohibits  the  continuance  of  any  strike  or  lockout  in  existence  in
connection  with  the  said  dispute.
                                                                [No,  24/6/64/II-LRL]
                                                             B.  R.  SETH,  Dy.  Secy.
PRINTED IN INDIA BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PHESS, MEW DELHI AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANAGER OT PUBLICATION*, DELHI, 1 9 6 4.
Cite this issue. Extraordinary Gazette of India, Government of India, 28 October 1964. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.csl_extraordinary.1964-10-28.E-1827-1964-0269-82953/. Archive identifier in.gazette.csl_extraordinary.1964-10-28.E-1827-1964-0269-82953.