Subject NOT available

click here for IIIF manifest

REGISTERED No. D. 222

The Gazette of India

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

No. 44] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1967/KARTIKA 13, 1889

Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed

as a separate compilation.

NOTICE

The undermentioned Gazettes of India Extraordinary were published up to the 21st October

1967.

Issued by

Subject

No. and Date

Issue No.

Ministry of Com-

S.O. 3760, dated 16 th

Amendment to S.O.1027, dated 26th 492

March, 1966.

October, 1967.

merce

Do.

S. O. 3761, dated 16th

October, 1967

Authorising Shri N. S. Vaidyanathan Deputy Secretary to exercise al the powers of the Director under the order mentioned therein.

( 4 0 8 7)

Subject

Issued by

No. and Date

Issue No.

S. O. 3764, dated 18th

493

Election Commi- ssion, India.

October, 1967.

Bye-election to the House of the People from Madras, South Parliamentary Constituency*

Fixation of the place or places at which

Ministry of Home

S.O. 3765, dated 18th

494

the Civil Court is to be held.

Affairs.

October, 1967.

Ministry of Com-

S.O. 3766, dated 19th

495

merce.

October, 1967.

Amendments to the notificat ion No S.O. 2842, dated 23rd September 1966.

Do.

S.O. 3767, dated 19th

496

October, 1967.

Direction that the East India Jute and Hessian Exchange Limited, Calcutta, to suspend entering into forward con- tracts in jute goods, other than (j) transferable specific delivery con- tracts and ("V) non-transferable specific delivery contracts for a further period of seven days with effect on and from the 20th October, 1967.

Do.

S.O. 3768, dated 20th

497

October, 1967.

Quality control and preshipment ins- pection of certain items of jute sacking cloth.

S.O. 3769, dated 20th

Do.'

October, 1967.

Recognition of the Indian Standards Institution Certification Mark with respect to jute sacking cloth.

S.O. 3770, dated 20th

i- Approval of the film as specified therein.

498

October, 1967.

Ministry of Informs tion and Broad- casting.

Election Commissio:

S.O. 3771, dated 20th

499

India.

October, 1967.

ti. Corrigendum to notification No. 56/67 —III (S.O. 3483), dated 26th Sep- tember, 1967.

Ministry of Com-

500 S.O. 3772, dated 20th

October, 1967.

merce.

Fixing with immediate effect for all classes of business the maximum ,.„,-! ,. :r,;rr,,.r, pr;c e Sj exclusive of :c • •;• i?x fri- ".e various ^;v.':- - •_ '•'< '" \bberand i"'"- * • ~ n ''ions ex- c' 1 < • • er.

S.O. 3773, dated 21st]

Do.

Amendment to S.C. .y?^, . .-led 28th 501

December, 1964.

October, 1967.

Do.

S.O. 3774, dated 21st

Amendment to S.O. 4394, dated 28th

December, 1964.

October, 1-967.

D o.

S.O. 3775, dated 2ist

October, 1967.

The Export of Jut* Hession and Jute Sacking (Inspection) Amendment Rules, 1967.

No. and Date

Issued by

Subject

Issue No.

[502 S.O. 3776, dated 21st Ministry of Information Approval of the film as specified October, 1967.

and Broadcasting.

therein.

Copies of the Gazettes Extraordinary mentioned above will be supplied Oil indent to the Manager of Publications, Civil Lines, Delhi. Indents should be submitted so as to reach the Manager -within ten days of the date of issue of these Gazettes.

PART n—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Statutory orders and notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Govern-

ment of India (other than the Ministry of Defence) and by Central

Authorities (other than the Administration of Union Territories )

ELECTION COMMISSION, INDIA

New Delhi, the 20th. October 1967

S.O. 3889.—In pursuance of the provisions contained in sub-section (1) of section 19AA of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Com- mission hereby directs that the following further amendments shall be made in its notification No. 58/UP/67, dated the ilth January, 1067, namely :—

In the table appended to the said notification for the entry in column Z againfit,—

(i) 6-Bahraich, the entry "Shri Damodar Kumar Jain, Deputy Collector, Bahraich", shall be substituted, to take effect from 20th September. 1967;

(ii) 24-Gharipur, the following shall be substituted, to take effect from the date specified against each: —

(a) "Shri C. H. Sharma, Additional Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohammad-

abad"~25th April, 1967.

(b) "Shri R. Tiwari, Deputy Collector, Ghazipur"—24th May, 1967.

(c) "Shri H. G, Viahnoi, Deputy Collector, Gharipur"—10th June, l9fl7.

(d) "Shri B. P. Singh, Deputy Collector, Ghaeipur"—4th August, 1967. (iii) 29-Jalaun, the entry "Shri Ram Lai, Deputy Collector and SubrPivi- sional Officer/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Konch" shall be stibstitutect

4090 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 4, 1967/KARTIKA 18, 1889 [PAUT I I-

(v) 54-Uttar Kashi, the entry "Shri D. D. Thapliyal, Deputy Collector, Uttar Kaahi" shall be substituted.

[No. 508/UP/67.]

New Delhi, the 26th October 1967

S.O. 3890.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 22 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Commission hereby cancels its following notifications:—

(2) No. 434/J&K/HP/66( dated the 2nd January, 1967. (3) No. 434/J&K/HP/66, dated the 20th February, 1967, (2) No. 434/J&K/HP/66, dated the 24th February, 1967.

[No. 434/J&K/67.]

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 9th October 1967

SO 3*91.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Keshar Singh 'a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from Jhabua constituency, has failed to lodged an account of his election expenses in the manner as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;

And whereas the said candidate, even after due notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure;

Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Keshar Singh to be disqualified for being chosen as and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order.

[No. MP-HP/36/67.]

New Delhi, the 18th October 1967

S O SS92.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri M. Krlshna- awamv Gounder of Melapattu Village, Ramakrlshnapuram (Post), (via) Hasa- namapet Cheyyar Taluk North Arcot District, a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from 8-Wandiwash Parliamentary constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses in the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1961, and the Rules made thereunder;

And whereas, after considering the representation made by the said candi- dateTthe Election Commission is Further satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for the failure;

period =. t t a. y"rS from the d.te „. this order. ^ ^ H P ^ , , , .]

New Delhi, the 24th October 1967

a n ISQI Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri V Rosaiah,

. e n S l on o f t h l ^ e o p le Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;

flcatlon for the failure;

as, and for beinjf a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order.

[No. MY-HP/14/67.]

S.O. S894.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri T. Ramlah, Thunganl, Kanakapura Taluk, a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from 12-Kanakapura constituency, has failed to lodge any account oT Ids election expenses as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;

And -whereas, after considering the representation made by the said candidate, the Election Commission is further satisfied that he has no good reason or justifi- cation for the failure;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10 A of the said Act, the Election Com- mission hereby declares the eaid Shri T. Ramiah to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date •of this order.

[No- MY-HP/12/67-]

By Order,

K. S. HAJAQOPALAN, Secy.

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 9th October 1967

S.O. 3895.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 and clause (5) of article 148 of the Constitution, the President hereby directs that the following amendments shall be made in the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, namely—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Amendment Rules, 1967.

(2) They shall come into force on the 1st day of November 1967.

2. In the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965—

(1) in rule 1.

(a) in sub-rule (3), after the words "Civil post", the words "Including a civilian post In the Defence Servcies", shall be Inserted;

(b) in sub-rule (4), clause (b) shall be omitted and clauses (c) to (h) shall be re-numbered as (b) to (g).

(2) in rule 2,

(a) in clause (a), for the figures "1957" the figures "1965" shall be substi- tuted;

(b) after clause (d), the following clause shall be inserted, namely— "(e) Defence Services" means services under the Government of India in the Ministry of Defence, paid of the Defence Services Estimates, and not permanently subject to the Armv Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950).

3. The Civilians in Defence Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1949,, shall stand repealed from the 1st day of November 1967.

[No. 4/8/67-Ests(C).]

HARISH CHANDRA, Under Secy.

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3896.—In pursuance of clause (1) of article 239 of the Constitution, th& President hereby directs that the Lieutenant Governors of the Union territories of Goa, Daman and Diu and Pondicherry shall, subject to the control of the President and until further orders, exercise the powers and discharge the functions of the appropriate Government under section 401 of the Code of Criminal Pro- cedure, 1898 (5 of 1898), within their respective territorial jurisdictions, except In respect of—

(a) cases involving the sentence of death where such sentence haa no1j

been commuted;

(b) cases where the sentence is for an offence against any law relating to- any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution; and

(c) cases where the order referred to in sub-section (4A) of section 401 of the said Code is passed under any law relating to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.

[No. F. 2/6/67-UTL.]

P. N. VASUDEVAN, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

SO 8897. In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Emigration Act. 19*22 (VII of 1922), the Central Government hereby appoint Shrl A. S. Mathotra, Superintendent, Regional Passport and Emigration Office, Delhi, to be Protector of Emigrants, Delhi in addition to hia own duties with effect from, October 4, 1967 vice Shri J. A. David, during his absence on tour to Jullundur.

[No. F.3(8)V.IV/80.]

^ ^^ .,

c. g. v. SUNDJ^AM;

AttacHe(PVA).

t

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(DetMU-tment of Economic Affairs)

OS

New Delhi, the 26th October 1967

S.O. 3898. —Statement of the Affaln of the Reterre Bank of India as on the 20th October 1967.

£1

BANKBM QBPARTMBNT

o

AWBTS

LuiiLinw

Rs.

Rs.

H W O

5,00,00,000

Notes

g o

22,56)34>ooo

OpiBil E"id Up

2,6l>000

Rupee Com . . .

5r

z

3,67,000

SUM! Coin

80,00,00,000

Raurn Pud

Bills Purchased and Discounted 1—

National A|ric*ltiifal Credit (Long Term

131,00.00.000

(")IaMtoal

Oper&tiottt) Fdttd .

(ft) External

I I

(<:) GoTernment Treaaary Bills .

245>45,5O.OOO

25/X)"0O^O0

National A^icmltural Cndit (Stabilisation) Fund .

20,24,72,000

1

Balances Held Abroad*

QwettqtsiRs**

184,13,87,000

NaioBallBdaMrial Credit (Long Term Operations')

3

Loan* and Advances to 1—

Fund

I

(C Central Gorernment

•

(ff) State GoTernments @ .

9O>96,97>000

AS3TS

Re

Rs.

s

Loans and Advances to :—

Deposit* i—

(0 Schnrfcitoi Commercial Baoka t - . .

99,65,000

171,85,41^00

(0) Sate Co-operative Bankstt

2,33,3°JOOO

(SO Other*

(J"J Central Government .

Loan*, Adraooet and InvestmeaU &omNctional Agncal-

taral Credit (LongTerm OpdatJoo*) Fundi—

(") Ldha and Advances to :—

(it) State Governments .

I

(0 State G o w m i o ui

N

28,35^5*000

13,95,27,000

O

(fiO Central Land Mortgage Banki .

(6) Banfcs

M

(fi) IuTdlmentin Central Land Mortgage Bank Debenture*

7,45,95^00

U

Loan* and Advanca from National Agriadbnal Credit

(0 Scheduled Commercial Banks . .

Sf

8352,61,000

Loata and Adrancea to State Co-operative Banki

(tf) Schednkd State Co-operative Banks

Loans, Advances and Inrestmeot* fromNatkmal Indnttrial

(w) Non-Scheduled State Co-opetatiye Banla

Credit (Long Term Operatknt) Fandi—

1

147,68,08,000

5^1,27,000

89,63^00

13,80,000

(te) Otter Buria .

(a) Loam and Advances to die Development Bank

5^4,i5>ooo

s

(&) TuTfjiniwit in boadgjdebenture! issued bv the

( d) O t h e rs . ..

267,4i>73>""

DeTetopmeBt Bank

,

ts I* _*.

38,10,51,000

Other Asacti

33,66,88,000

47,90,16,000

B i l ls P a ^ b le . O t h er L i a b i l i t i es . . . ..

$

835.75i75^"O

Rupees

R u p e es

835>75,75,OOO

•Indade* Cash and Soon-term Securities.

••Exdoding investoientB from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fond and the National Industrial Credit (Long Term

Operations) Fund.

_

5 (gEiciading Loans and Advances from the National Asricuhural Credit (Long Term Operations} Fond, bat including temporary overdrafts to

la State Governments.

tladodes Rs. NIL advanced to scheduled commercial banks against usance biDs under section i?(4Xc) of the Reserve Bank of Indis An.

tfExdndrng Loans and Advances from the National Agricultural Credit CLong Term Operations) Fund and the National Agricultural Credit (Stabili-

sation) Fund.

Dated the 25th day of October, 1967.

f

An Acconat pursuant to the Resem Bank of Indk Act, 1934, for the w"tk eoded the 20th da; of October 1967.

I s sn D B F U T U NT

R3.

ASSETS

LUBXUTIBS

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

G o ld C o in and Bullion t—

Hotes bdd in the Banking Departnsent.

" 5 . 8 9 . 2 5 ^"

(fl) H e ld in India .

( i) H cU outside I o dk

2969,09,95,000

otes in circulation

2991^6^9^000

Total I*wct Uned .

F o n %n Secoritiet . . ..

166^2,00/XM

a !

T O T AL .

282,31^5,000

79139,86,000

R o p ee Coin . . ..

G o f e n r m e nt of I a dk R u p ee S e c n t i t k*

2629,95 18/XM

i

Tirtirmi BQb Of B'rfhgny "nd

• •

otber comnmcttl pepcr .

TOTAL LJABIUTIES

2991^6^9^100

TOTAL ASSETS

2991,66,29^00

o | Dated the 25th day of October 1967.

L. K. JHA,

w

[No. F.3(3)-BCf67.]

V. SWAM1NATHAN, Under Secy.

I

I—"

CD

I

(Department of Kevenne and Insnmnco)

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

SO- 3899.—In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 4 of the Income-tax

(Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby appoints

the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat II, Ahmedabad, to be the Tax Recovery

Commissioner.

2, This notification *hall come into force on the first day of December, 1967.

[No. 140 (F. No. 16/14/66-IT(B)).]

S.O. 3900.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iii) of clause

(44) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, (4 of 1961). the Central Govern-

ment hereby makes the following amendment ia the notification of the Govern-

ment of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance)

No. 48 (F. No. l"/14/60-ITB) dated the 25th May, 1966.

In the said notification, for the worda "Ahmedabad District and Sabarkantha

District1', the words "Ahrnedabad, Sabarkantha, Mehsana, Gandhinagar and

Banaskantha Districts" shall *>e substituted.

2. This notification shall come into force on the first day of December, 1967.

[No. 142 (F. No. ia/14/66-IT(B)).]

S-O. 3901-—In exercise of the powers conferred by aub-clause (iii) of clause

(44) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1661 (43 of 1061), the Central Govern-

ment hereby authorises Shri K. K. Shah who la a Gazetted Offlcer of the Central

Government, to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery ^Officer under the said

Act, in respect of the following Districts in the State of Gujarat namely: —

"1. Bhavnagar.

2. Amrell.

3. Rajkot.

4. Surendranafar.

9. Jamnagar.

6. Junagadh.

7. Kutch.".

2. This notification shall come Into force on the first day of December, 1967.

{No- 143 (F. No. 16/14/68-IT(B) ).]'

S.O. 3902 —In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (111) of clause

(44) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (4S of 1981), tha Central Govern-

ment hereby authorises Shrl J. B. Gidwani who ia a Gazetted Officer of the Cen-

tral Government, to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery Officer under the

said Act, in respect of the following districts In the State "f Gujarat, namely: —

"1. Baroda.

2. Kaira,

3. Panclim&kals.

4. Broach.

6. Svrat.

0. Bulsar.

7. Dangfl.".

2. Thfs notification shell come Into force on the first day of December, 1967.

[No. 144 (F. No, 10/14/06-ITB).]

WASIQ ALI KHAN, Dy. Secy.

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

INCOMI-TAX

New Delhi, the 20th October 1967

S.O. MM.—In exercise of the powers conferred by iub-sectio* (1) of Section. 122 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (is of 1961) and all other ptfwers enabling it in that behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby makes the following further amendment in the Schedule appended to its Notification No, 52 dated 7th July, 1967 namely:

Against 'A' Range Nagpur under Column (2) the following shall be added:— 23. City Circle and Refunds, Nagpur.

Explanatory Note:

The amendment haa become necessary on account of the re-designation of the existing City Circle. Nagpur as City Circle and Refunds, Nagpur In the Com- missioner's charge.

(The above note does not form a part of the Notification, but is intended to be merely clarificatory.

[No. 133 (F- NO. 50/20/67-ITJ).]

P. G. GANDHI, Under. Secy.

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

S.O. 8904.—In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 5 of the Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules 1962 the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Central Bwirtttrf Direct Taxe3 No. 52 (F, No. 16/14/86-ITB), dated the 2Bth May, 1966, namely:—

In the said notification, for the words "Ahmedabad District and Sabarkantha District in the State of Gujarat", the following words and figures shall be oub- Btituted, namely:^

"The following Districts in the State of Gujarat, namely:—

1. Ahmedabad. 2. Sabarkantha. 3. Mehsana. 4. Gandhlnagar. 5. Banaskantha.

*6. Bhavnagar.

7. Amreli- 8. Rajkot. 9. Surendranagar.

10. Jamnagar. 11. Junagadh. 12. Ku^ch, 13. B"roda. 14. KaW. 15. PwxchmahRlfl. 16. Broach. 17. Surat. 18. Bujsar. 19. Dange,".

2. This notification shall come Into force om the first day of December, 1967.

[No. ISO (F. No. ld/lVM-tTB).}

S.O. 89t5.—In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 5 of the Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that the Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat II, Ahmedabad who is appointed as Tax Recovery Commissioner, shall perform the functions of the Tax Recovery Commissioner, in respect of the following Districts in the State of •Gujarat, namely: —

"1. Ahmedabad.

2. Sabarkantha. 3. Mehsana. 4. Oandhlnagar. 5. Banaskantha. 6. Bhavnajtsr, 7. Amreli. 8. Rajlcot. 9. Surendranagar.

10. Jamnagw. 11. Junagadh. 12. Kutch. 13. Baroda. 14. Kaira. 19. Panchirmhalfl. 18. Broach. 17. Surot. 18. Bulsar. IS- Dangs."

2. This notification shall come into force on the first day of December, 1967.

[No. 141 (F. No. 16/14/66-ITB).]

VTASIQ ALI KHAN, Secy.

OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOE OF CENTRAL EXCISE, M.P. & VIDAIIBHA

ClHTRAL ExCISBB

Naapur, dated- 7th October 1967

(Corrigendum to Notifications Nos. 2/1967-C. Ex; dated 25th April, 1967, and 5/1967-C. Ex; dated 6th August, 1967)

S.O. 3906.—For the words "Full powers" appearing in column 3 of the table subjoined to this Collectorate Notifications Nos. 2/1967 (Central Excises), dated 25th April, 1967 and 5/1967 (Central Excises), dated 9th August, 1987, read "To grant permission to the manufacturers of excisable goods, not to make entries in RGI/E.B. 4 accounts on the dates when there is no production, receipt in store room or clearance of the particular excisable goods, provided the manu- facturers declare that no such transaction has taken place or would take place on any date for which no entries are made and also undertake to make entries as and when such transaction takes place.".

[No. 8/1967.]

VIPIN MANEKLAL, Collector.

OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD (DN)

CENTHAL EXCISES

Hyderabad, the 15th October 1967

(Corrigendum to Notification No. 6/67 (C.Ex.) dated 29th August, 1967

S-O. 3907.—Against Serial No- 5 In Column 2 of this Collectorate Notification No. 6/67 dated 29th August 1967, for the letters and figures "A.R. 6" against Rule 96ZD(2) read "A.R. 10*.

[No. 7/67.]

M. L. ROUTH, Collector.

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

New Delhi, the ZBth October 1867

S.O. 3908.—The Central Government having considered in consultation with the Forward Markets Commission, the application for renewal of recognition made under section 5 of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 (74 of 1952) by the Indian Exchange Ltd-, Amritsar and being satisfied that it would be in the Interest of the trade and also in the public interest to do so, hereby granta in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the said Act, recognition to the said Exchange for a further period of three years from 11th November, 1967 upto 10th November, 1970 (both days Inclusive) in respect of forward contracts in cotton seed.

2. The recognition hereby granted is subject to the condition that the said Exchange shall comply with such directions as may from time to time be given by the Forward Markets Commission.

[No. 34(17j-CG(FMC)/67.]

M. L. GUPTA, Under Secy.

(Office of the Chief Controller of Imports & Exports)

ORDER

New Delhi, the 6th October 1967

S O. 3909 — In exercise of the powers conferred by clause 9 of the Import Con- trol Order 1955, dated 7th December, 1955 as amended, the undersigned hereby cancels the Customs Purposes copy of Import Licence No. 219149/Cas-h/80/CCI/ HEP/CGII dated 18th June, 1963 for Rs. 6,23,200/- (Rupees six lakha twenty three thousand and two hundred only) issued to the Chief Engineer, Planning Projects Section 9-Ram Bagh, Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala. The original Cus- toms Purposes copy of the licence was utilised for Rs. 13,362/- (Rupees Thirteen thousand three hundred & sixty two only).

2 The reason for the cancellation is that the Customs purposes copy of the licence has been lost/misplaced by the licensee who has requested for the issue- of a duplicate licence in lieu thereof.

[No. CGII/HEP/P. 7/63.64/090.T

G. S. SHARMA,

Dy. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports,. for Chief Controller of Imports & Exports.

(Office of the Chief Controller of Imports & Exports)

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 21st October 1967

S.O. 3910.—M/s. Hazrat & Co. Mevpro Gunts Division, Bombay were Brwated o" import licence No. P|RM|2150845|C|XX|23|GlH|21-22 dated the 25tk Jun", 1986..

They have applied for issue of a duplicate customs purposes copy of the licence for Et. 889 (Threa hundred and eightynine only) on the ground that the original Custome Purposes copy of the licence has been misplaced.

In support of thia contention, the applicant has filed an affidavit. I am satisfied that the original Customs Purposes copy of licence No. P/RM/2150645/C/XX/23/ C/H/21-22 dated the 23th June, 1986 has been misplaced and direct that a dupli- cate Customs Purposes copy of the licence should be issued to the applicant. The •original Customs Purposes copy of the said licence is cancelled.

[No. G & G/ff(l-2)/AM 67/RM 3/2765.1

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3911.—M/E. Asian Paints (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bombay were granted an Import licence No. F/RM/2152412 dated 8th August, 1966. They have applied for a duplicate Exchange Control Copy of the licence on the ground that the ori- ginal Exchanga Control Copy of the licence has been lost or misplaced.

In support of this contention, the applicant has filed an affidavit. I am satisfied that the original Exchange Control Copy of the licence No. P/RM/2152412 has been lost/misplaced and direct that a duplicate Exchange Control Copy of the licence should be issued to the applicant. The original Exchange Control Copy 'Of the licence is cancelled.

[No. Falnts/17(6e)/66-fl7/R.M.6.] P. C. VERMA, Dy. Chief Controller of Impt. & Expts. for Chief Controller of Impts. & Expts.

MINISTRY OF STEEL, MINES AND METALS

(Department of Mines & Metals)

ERRATUM

New Delhi, the 24th October 19C7

S.O. 391S.—In the notification of the Government of India In the Ministry o* Steel, Mines and Metals (Department of Mines and Metals) No. S.O- 2262, dated the 26th June, 1967, published in Part II Section 3, Sub-section (11) of the Gazette -of India, dated the 8th July, 1967 at pages 2267 to 2270: —

1. at page 2267—

In line 2, after "Steel and Mines", insert "(Department of Mines and Metals)".

2. at page 2268, in Schedule I—

(i) In SI- No- 7, /or "Dborda", read "Diborda". (il) in SI- No- 13 for "Dooghara", read "Deoghara"; (Hi) in Si. No- 16 for "Chas" read "Topchanchi"; (iv) in SI. No- 29 for "Totonagabad", read "Telengabad''

3- at page 2269—

(1) in line 14, for "Pabratpur", read "Parbatpur"; (U) in line 20, for "Panrodi", read "PanredT; (ill) in line 40, for "Fogldl" read "Jotfdi"; (lv) In line 41, for "520 o 523", read "520 to 523"; (v) in lino 4G, for "992(P)", read "892 (P); (vi) in line 51, for "Kajhlladih", read "Majniladlh-"

£No. C2-20(5)/69-] RAM SAHAY, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING

(Deportment of Health)

ORDER

New Delhi, the 29th October 1967

S.O. ""ll.^rher*Bs tho Government of India in th*vlate Miflfctay OS Health Thfta, by notiflo"tion No. 32-16/64-MPT, dated the 16th February, 196S, made, in

exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 14 of the Indian Medical Council Act, l&OT (102 of 1956), recognised the medical qualification "M.D." granted by the University of British Columbia, Canada for the purposes of the said Act;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to sub- section (1) of section 14 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), the Central Government hereby specifies the period of two¹ years with effect from the date of this order or so long as Dr. Donald Edward Clunas who possesses the said qualification continues to work in the N. M. Wadia Hospital, Shultrawar Feth, Poona-2 to which tie is attached for the time being for the purposes of teaching, research or charitable work, whichever is shorter, as the period to which the medical practice of the said Dr. Donald Edward Clunas shall be limited. Provid- ed that the said doctor continues to be enrolled as medical practioner in accor- dance with the law regulating the registration of medical practitioner for the time being in force in the country of hia origin.

[No. F. 19-30 /67-MFT,]

L. K. MURTHY, Under Secy.

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND SHIPPING

(Transport Wins)

New Delhi, the 21st October 1967

S.O. 3914.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 61A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (4 of 1939), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Z. S. Jhala, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Transport and Shipping (Transport Wing), as Chairman of the Inter-State Transport Commission in place of Shri S. N. Sinha, and makes the following amendment in the notification Of the Government of India in the Ministry of Transport and Shipping (Transport Wing), No. 23-T(ll)/07, dated the 4th October, 1967, namely:

In the said notification, for item (1), the following item shall be substituted, namely:—

"(1) Shri 2. S. Jhala, Joint Secretary, Ministry Of Transport and Shipping (Transport Wing)".

[No. 28-T(ll)/6T.]

B. M. MAZUMDAB, Under Secy.

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

S.O. SB15.—Consequent on hia selection for appointment as Deputy Director (Technical) Shri M. Ramanathan, relinquished charge of the post of Assistaat Secretary Southern Regional Electricity Board, Bangalore on the afternoon of the 6th October, 1967.

[No. 1/21/67-Adm. I.] M. M. DHAWAN, Under Secy. for Chairman, CEA.

MINISTRY OP INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING

New Delhi, the 20th October 1967

3;O. SM*:—In etttcise of the powers conferred by Section 5(1) of the Cinema- tograph Act* 1963, end "ub-rule (8) of rule 8 read with Bub-rule 2 of rule 9 of the Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules. 1958, the Central Government hereby appoints following perrons as members of th" Advisory Panel of the Central Board of Film Censors, at Mediae with Immediate effect.

1. Smt. MALATI CHHHDTIH. 2. Shri C. E. SABMA,

[No. 11/3/65-FC]

New Delhi, the 21st October 1967

8.O. 3917.—In ex"rcise of the powers conferred by Section 5(1) of the Cinematograph Act, 1932 a"d sub-rule (3) of rule 8 read with eub-rule 2 of rule D of the Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules, 1958, the Central Government here- by appoints following momebrs as a member of th" Advisory Panel of the Central Board of Film Censors at Bombay with immediate effect.

1- Shri T- V- Ramanujam.

2. Shri H- R. Mahajanl.

3. Shri G. C. Jhala-

FNo- F. 11/4/86-FC1

S.O. 3918.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 5(1) of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and sub-rule (3) of rule 8 read with sub-rule 2 of rule 9 of the Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules, 1958, the Central Government hereby appoints following persons after consultation with Central Board of Film Censors, as a member of the Advisory Panel of the said Board ai Calcutta with immediate effect.

1. Smt- Rita Ray.

2. Smt. Ashapurna Debl.

[No. r.ll/3/66-FC.J

H. C. KHANNA, Dy. Secy.

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3919.—In pursuance of the Directions issued under the provisions of each* of the enactments specified in the First Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government after considering the recommendation of the Film Advisory Board, Bombay hereby approves the film specified In column 2 of the second Schedule annexed hereto in all its language versions to be of the description specified against it in column fl of the said second Schedule.

THB FIRST SCHEDIILB

(1) Sub-Section (3) of Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regula- tion) Act, 19W, (President's Act 4 of 1955).

THE SECOND SCHEDULE

Length 35

s.

Name of the Producer

mm

Name of the Ap-

plicant

Title of the film

No.

Whether a scientific film or a film intend- ed for educational purpose* or a film dealing with news and current events or a documentary film

6 3

I

5

3

4

304. 80M

t.

Director of Information inn Pub- lic Relations, Gort. of Andhrt Pradesh, Hyderabad.

Ncllore (Telugu, English and Urdu

Documentary film (For release in Andhia Pradesh Cir- cuit only).

[No. F. Z4/1/67-FP. App. 1209.}

S.O. 3920.—In pursuance of the directions issued under the provisions of each of the enactments specified in the first Schedule annexed hereto, the Central Government after considering the recommendation of the Film Advisory Board, Bombay hereby approves the film specified in column 2 of the second Schedule annexed hereto in all its language versions to be of tho description specified against it in column 6 of thd said Second Schedule.

THE FIRST SCHEDULE

(1) Sub-Section (4) of Section 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regula- tion) Act, 1955 (Uttar Pradesh Act No. 3 of 1956).

THE SECOND SCHEDULE

Title of the

Name of the Appli-

s.

film

cant

Name of the Producer

Length 35 mm

No.

Whether a scientific film or a film intend- ed for educational purposes or a film dealing with news and current events or a documentary film.

1

2

6

4

5

3

1.

253.29M Educational Expansion Officer, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

Utiar Pradesh Ke Niwasi- Garhwali Part II

Film intended for educational purposes (For release in U. P. circuit only).

[No. F. 24/1/67-FP. App. 1210.]

BANU RAM AGGARWAL, Under Secy.

MINISTRY OF WORKS, HOUSING AND SUPPLY

(Department of Works and Housing)

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3921.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premise--. (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958 (32 of 1958), the Central 'Government hereby .'promts the officers mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, being gazcttrd officers of Government, to be estate officers for the pur- poses of the said Act, who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties imposed, on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of their jurisdiction in respect o[ the public premises specified in the corres- ponding entry in column (2) of the said Table.

THE TABLE

Categories of public premises and local Designation of officers

limits of jurisdiction.

(2)

CD

1. Shri Hoshiar Singh, P.C.S.3 Deputy Commis-

sioncr-cwm-Estatc Officer.

Premises under the adminstrative control of tho Administrator union, territory of Chandi- garh situated within the union territory of Chandigarh .

2. Shri S. K. Dewan, P.C.S., Assistant Estate

Officer.

[No. 21011(4)/88-Pol.]

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

S.O. 3922.—In exercise of the powers confirmed by section 3 of the Public Itemises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958 (32 of 1958), the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Works, Housing and Supply (Deptt. of Works & Housing) S.O. No. 2982 dated 22nd August, 1967, namely: —

In the table below the said notification for the existing entries in columns 1 and 2, the following shall respectively be substituted namely: —

THE TABLE

Designation of the officers. (1)

Chief Technologist, National Sugar Institute, Kanpur.

Categories of public premises and local limits of jurisdiction.

(2)

Premises under the administrative control of the Director, National Sugar Institute, Kan- pur, including any land or building acquired under the Land Acquisition Act or under any other law for purposes of the National Sugar Institute situated within the municipal corporation limits of Kanpur.

[No. F. 21.011 (4)/66-Pol.] V. P. AGNIHOTRI, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

(Cultural Activities Division)

[CAKD Section]

(ARCHAEOLOGY)

New Delhi, the 24th October 1967

S.O. 3923.—Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Education No. S.O. 2083, dated the 9th June, 1967, published in Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii) of the Gazette of India dated the 24th June, 1967, the Central Government gave notice of its intention to declare the archaeological site and remains specified in the Schedule below to be of national importance.

And whereas no objections have been received to the making of such declara- tion.

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 4 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act 1958 (24 of 1958), the Central Government hereby declares the said archaeological site and remains to be of national importance.

THE StHEDULB

at

District

Description of the

Area

State

Locality-

Taluk

Boundries

• Re- marks

Owner- ship

site

SL No.

H

Revenue plot •umber to be in- cluded under pro- tection

B

2

i

IO

II

6

8

5

9

3

7

4

O

Mysore Gulbarga AEzalpur

I

Private Udchaii, (known also as Urchanl

6 acres to Guntnas

H

Part of survey plot No. 12 as shown in the plan repro- duced below.

North Remaining portion of survey plot No 12.

Ancient site com- prised in part of survey plot No. 12 as shown in the plan reproduced below, jj

East

O

Remaining portion of survey plot No. 12.

South

I

Survey plot No. 6

West

I—{{^{{FOOTNOTE *}}}}s

Remaining portion of survey plot No. 12.

3

H 3 w o

3

0

MS

z

d

1

w

a

I—I

B

CO

|

MINISTRY OF LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT AND REHABILITATION

(Department of Labour and Employment)

New Delhi, the 21st October 1987

S.O. 3924.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 73F of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government, having regard to the location of the factory, namely, the Automobile Workshop belonging to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi at Jhandewalan, New Delhi, in an implemented area, hereby exempts the said factory from the payment of the employer's special contribution leviable under Chapter VA of the said Act for a period of one year with effect from the 28th October, 1967.

[No. F. 6/26/67-HI.l

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3935.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central. Govern- ment hereby appoints the 29th day of October, 1907, as the date on which the provisions of Chapter IV (except sections 44 and 45 which have already been Drought into force) and Chapters V and VI [except sub-section (1) of section 76 and sections 77, 78, 79 and 81 which have already been brought into force] of the said Act shall come into force in the following areas in the State of Uttar Pradesh,, namely:—

1. Area within village Magarwara Pargana Hadha Tehsil and District Unnao.

2- Area within villages Sheikhpur and Akarampur, Pargana, Tehsil end

District Unnao,

3- Area within the Municipal limit, Pargana, Tehsil and District Unnao.

[No. F. 13(16)/67-HI.l

S.O. 3926.—In exerciae of the powers conferred by -clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby appoints the Deputy Secretary (Health and Labour) to the Government of Kerala, Health and Labour (G) Department, as a member of the Central Board of Trustees, and makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the late Department of Social Security No. S.O. 1156 dated the 1st April, 1965, namely:—

In the said notification, for the entry, "The Commissioner of Labour, Govern- ment of Kerala, Trlvandrum" against serial number 10, the following entry shall be substituted, namely:—

"The Deputy Secretary (Health and Labour) to the

Government of Kerala, Health and Labour (G) Department, Trivandrum."

[No. 12(5)63-PF-II(Pt).J

S.O. 3927.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment Messrs. Ram Sal Mica Exports, Gudur. Nellore (Andhra Pradesh) have agreed that the provi- sions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made- applicable to the said establishment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of sec- tion 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

This notification shall be deemed to have come into force on the 1st day of August, 1966.

[No. 8(21)67-PF. II. 1

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

S.O. 3928.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 73F of the Emplo- yees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), and having regard to the location of the factory viz., the High Court Preas (a wing of the Government Central Press) Hyderabad, the Central Government hereby exempts the said Press from the

payment of the employer's special contribution leviable under Chapter VA of the said Act for a period of one year up to and including the 24th September, 1WJ8.

[No. F.6(53)/67-HI.]

New Delhi, the 26th October 1967

S.O. 3929.—Whereas the State Government of Haryana has in pursuance of •clause (d) of section 4 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948;, nominated Shri R. I. N. Ahuja, Secretary to the Government of Haryana, Labour and Employment Departments, Chandigarh, to represent that State on the Em- ployees' State Insurance Corporation In place of Shri P. N. Bhalla;

Now. therefore, in pursuance of section 4 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment In the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employ- ment) No. S.O. 2561 dated the 9th August, 1966, namely: —

In the said notification, under the heading "Nominated by the State Govern- ments under clause (d) of section (4)", for the entry against item 11A, the follow- ing entry shall be substituted, namely: —

"Shri R. I. N. Ahuja, Secretary to the Government of Haryana, Labour and Employment Departments, Chandigarh".

[No. F. 3/18/66-HL]

New Delhi, the 27th October 1967

S.O. 3930.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the first proviso to section 6 of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) the Central Govern- ment after making necessary enquiry into the matter, hereby specifies that, with effect from the 1st June, 1956, section 6 of the said Act shall, in, its application to Messrs. Raj Commercial Corporation, Bombay—Agra Road, P.O. Waghle Industrial Estate, Thana, be subject to the modification, that for the words ''six and a quarter per cent", the words "eight per cent" shall be substituted.

[No. 8(68)66.PF.IL]

S.O. 3931.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs. Raj Commercial Corporation, Bombay—Agra Road, P.O., Waghle Indus- trial Estate, Thana, Maharashtra, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act. 1952 (19 of 1952) should be made applicable to the said establishment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

This notification shall be deemed to have come into force on the 1st day of

J u n e' ¹⁹⁶⁶-

[No. 8(68)66.PF.IL]

S.O. 8932.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs. Rockweld Electrodes India Limited, Plot No. 29, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Madras-58, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees Provi- dent Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establish- ment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of sec- tion 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment;

This notification shall come into force on the 31st day of October, 1967.

[No. 8/132/67/PF-II]

S.O. 3938.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs Jamir Company Private Limited, 6, Little Russel Street, Calcutta-16, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

This notification shall be deemed to have come into force on the 31nt day of August, 1967.

[No. 8/142/67/PF-II]

S.O. 3934.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs Azad Rubber Company Private Limited, 72, Meredith Street, Calcutta-13, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

This notification shall be deemed to have come into force on the 31st day of August, 1967.

[No. 8/133/67/FF-IL]

S.O. 3935.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment known as Messrs. Neo Indra Bhavan, 13, Ghandi Road, Ranipet, North Arcot District, Madras State, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

This notification shall come into force on the 3l3t day of October, 1967.

[No. 8/136/67/PF-IL]

S.O. 3936.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that the employer and the majority of the employees in relation to the establishment Messrs. Dumraon Properties and Enterprises Private Limited, Bhojpur House, Dumraon, E. Railway (Bihar State) have agteed that the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds Act, 19S2 (19 of 1962), should be made applicable to the said -establishment;

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to the said establishment.

[No. 8(4)/66-PF-II.]

HANS RAJ CHHABRA, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour & Employment)

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

SO. 3937.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (1) of Section 5 ot the Mines Act, 1952 (3S of 1952) the Central Government hereby appoints Shri B N Singh as Deputy Director of Mines Safety subordinate to the Chief Inspector of Mines and makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and Employment No. S.O. 531 dated the 2nd March, 1961, namely:—

In the said notification, after serial No, 83 the following entry shall be Inserted

namely:—

"(84.) Shrl B. N. Singh"

[No. 8/80/67-M-I.]

J, D. TEWARI, Under Secy-

(Department of Labour & Employment)

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1987

S.O. 3938.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Haranhalli Manganese Mine of the Board of Mineral Develop- ment, Bangalore-1 and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govern- ment on the 19th October, 1967-

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL IN MYSORE, BANGALORE

Dated 16th October 1967

PRESENT:

Sri A. Panchakshariah, B.A., (Hons), LLB-, Presiding Officer-

REF. (CENTRAL) NO. 1 OF 1OT7

I PAHTY:

II PARTY:

Sri A. Rudrappa and The Management of the Board of —Vs— Sri S. Krishna Rao Mineral Development, Bangalore.

APPEARANCES :

For the I Party: Sri K- Subba Rao, Advocate, Bangalore. For the II Party: Sri B. R. Puttananjappa, Secretary, Mysore State Employers' Association, Bangalore-

REFERENCE;

(No- 35/16/66-LRI dated 19th June 1967 of the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation, Department of Labour and Employment, Government of India>-

AWARD

The Management of the Board of Mineral Development, Bangalore, terminated the services of Sri A. Rudrappa and Sri Krishna Rao, by the two memos Issued by the General Manager on 27th April, 1966- The termination had to take place with effect from the afternoon of 30th April, 1966- On these, both the workers raised an industrial dispute, the matter was conciliated, but as the Board or Mineral Development was adatnent, the conciliation ended hi failure. On the re- auest of the two workmen, the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Employ- ment and Rehabilitation, Department of Labour and Employment, New Delhi, cons- tituted the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, as the Tribunal for deciding and ad- judicating the dispute between the workmen and the Management of the Boarci of Mineral Development, Bangalore- Accordingly the Government of India, through Its Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation, Department of Labour and Employment, made a Reference on 19th June, 1967 under Section 10(l)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947). The subject matter of the Reference is: —

"Whether the Board of Mineral Development, Bangolore, is Justified in ter- minating the services of Sarvashrl A. Rudrappa and S- Krishna Kao employed as Junior Managers in their Haranahalli Manganese Mine under Rule 18 of the Work Service Rules? If not, to what relief are they entitled?"

2. On receipt of this Reference, It was registered as Ref- (Central) No. 1 of 1967 and notices were served on both the Parties to file their pleadings- The I Party, the two workmen, filed their claim statement onL 24th July, 1967^ through Mr. K- Subba Rao, their Advocate- The II Party filed the Counter Statement on 19th August 1967- Issues were framed and the Parties were directed to leave

Parties whereby the matter was reported to have been settled. According to this settlement, the following are the terms of Settlement: —

"1. It la atrreod that the II Party-Management will reinstate Sri A. Rudrap- pa and Sri Krishna Rao with immediate effect with continuity of service.

2- It is agreed that for the period from the date of relief of each of the above employees viz. from 30th April, 1966 to the date of reinstatement, he will be paid fifty per cent of the wages, with all other emoluments. 3- Lastly, it is agreed that this settlement Is in full satisfaction of the claims of each of the above two employees ''

With the above conditions both the Parties prayed that an Award be passed on the above terms.

3. I find that this settlement is advantageous to both the Parties and therefore, I accept this settlement and pass an award in terms of the Memorandum of Settle- ment. I direct the II Party to reinstate bofh Sri A. Rudrappa and Sri Krishna Rao to their former posts with immediate effect and with continuity of service- Fur- ther, I direct that each of the workmen be paid 50 per cent of the wages and other emoluments from the date of termination i.e. from 30th April, 1966 up to the date of reinstatement. I further direct that each Party will bear its own costs in the circumstances of the case. This is in full settlement of the claim of both the Parties. This Memorandum of Settlement will form part of the Award.

(Sd.) A, PANCHAKSHARIAH,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore.

BEFORE THE IION'BLE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (CENTRAL), BANGALORE.

RBF, (CENTRAL) NO. 1 OF 1967

I PARTY:

II PARTY:

Sri A- Rudrappa and The Management of the Board of Mine-

ral Development, Bangalore.

Shri S. Krishna Rao- Vs.

Memo Filed by the Parties

1- The Parlies abovenamed submit that they have settled the above dispute on the following terms:—

1. It i" agreed that the II Party-Managemene will reinstate Sri A Rudrappa and Sri Krishna Rao with immediate effect with continuity of service. 2. It is agreed that for the period from the date of relief of each of the above employees fo the date of reinstatement, he will be paid fifty per cent of the wages, with all emoluments,

3. It is agreed that this settlement is in full satisfaction of the claims of each of the above two employees.

2. The Parties pray that the Hon'ble Tribunal m"y be pleased to pass an Award on the above terms-

3. It is agreed that each Party should bear Its own costs of this dispute.

(Sd.) K. SUBBA RAO,

(Sd.) C. R. KESHVAMUKTHY,

Advocate for the I Party. Personnel Officer,

Board of Mineral Development, for U Party.

Bangalore, 11th October, 1987.

[No. 35/16/66-LRI.]

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 25th October 1967

S.O. 3939.—Whereas the industrial dispute specified in the Schedule hereto annexed (hereinafter referred to as the said dispute) is pending before Shri D M Vin, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad;

And, whereas for the ends of justice and convenience of parties, the said •dispute should be disposed of without further delay;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7A, and sub- section (1) of section 33B, of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal with Shri I. Q. Thakore as the Presiding Officer with headquarters at Ahmedabad and with- draws the proceedings in relation to the said dispute from Shri D. M. Vin, and transfers the same to Shri I. G. Thakore, Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, for the disposal of the said proceedings with the direction that the said Tribunal shall proceed with the said proceedings from the beginning and dispose of the same according to law.

SCHEDULE

Parties to the dispute.

S. O. No. of Gazette

Reference No. and date to Indus-

trial Tribunal.

Year of Publication.

36/21/67-LRI

3274 of 1967.

Associated Cement Companies Quarries Balasinor -and their workmen.

dated the 8th September 1967.

[No. 38/21/67-LRL]

New Delhi, the 26th October 1967

S.O, 8940.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Punjab Co-operative Bank Limited, Amritsar and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And, whereas the Central Government considers It desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 erf 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indus- trial Tribunal, Delhi constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether having regard to the duties performed by Shri Baij Nath Seth, Clerk, Punjab Co-operative Bank Limited, Chandni Chowk, Delhi the demand of the Punjab Co-operative Bank Employees Union, Delhi that he should be regularised as a clerk with effect from the 1st Sep- tember, 1965 instead of 1st August, 1967 is justified? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled?

[No. 51/63 /67-LRII1.J

S. S. SAHASRANAMAN, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour & Employment

New Delhi, the 23rd October 1967

S.O. 3941.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 5A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, ]948 (9 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri Niharendu Dutta Mazumdar as a member of the Calcutta Dock Labour Board vice Shri Bishwanath Dubey died, and makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employment) No. S.O. 1322 dated the 7th April, 1967, namely:

In the said notification, under the heading "Members representing the dock workers", in item (1), for the entry, "Shri Bishwanath Dubey", the entry, "Shri Niharendu Dutta Mazumdar" shall be substituted.

[No. 53/23/67-Fac. II.]

New Delhi, the 21th October 1967

S.O. 3492.—In exercise of tho powers conferred by section 8 of the Coal Mines labour Welfare Fund Act, 1947 (32 of 1947), read with rule 3 of the Coal Mines labour Welfare Fund Rules, 1949, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S. N. Jha, as a member of the Advisory Committee to represent the interests of the workmen employed in Coal Mines, vice Shri B. P. Jha deceased, and makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Labour and Employment No. S.O. 4380 dated the 23rd December, 1964, namely: —

In the said notification against serial No. 18, for the entry "Shri B. P. Jha", the following entry shall be substituted, namely: —

"Shri S. N. Jha.".

[No. 3/4/67-M, II.] S.O. 394a.—The following draft of a scheme further to amend the Madras Un- registered Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1957, which the Central Government proposes to make in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 (0 of 1948), is published, as required by the said sub-section for the information of all persons likely to be affected thereby; and notice is hereby given that the said draft will be taken into consideration on or after the 20th November, 1967.

Any objections or suggestions which may be received from any person with respect to the said draft before the date so specified will be taken into considera- tion by the Central Government.

Draft Scheme

1. This Scheme may be called the Madras Unregistered Dock Workers (Regu- lation of Employment) Amendment Scheme, 1967.

2. In the Schedule to the Madras Unregistered Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1957, after item (6), the following item shall be added, namely: —

"(7) Labour employed in handling iron and steel, billets and timber.".

[No. 62/3/67-FAC. II.] K, D. HAJELA, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour and Employment) New Delhi, the 26th October 1967

S.O. 3944.—In pursuance of section 17 Of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Bejdih Colliery of Messrs Equitable. Coal Company Limited, Post Office Dishergarh Burdwan and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 23rd October, 1967.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

REFERENCE NO. 32 OF 1967

PARTIES:

Employers in relation to the Bejdih Colliery of Messrs Equitable Coal Company Ltd.,

AND

Their workmen.

PRESENT;

Shri S. K. Sen—Presiding Officer.

A F P ITCo T L lf of Employers-*^ Manoj K. Mukherjce, Advocate.

On behalf of W o ^ n - S h ri S. N. Banerjee, A d v o c a t e^ ^ ^

STATE: West Bengal.

AWARD

JS^S^S^S^SS srax s sstras

to the Bejdih colliery of Messrs Equitable Coal Company Limited, P.O. Diser- garh, Distt. Burdwan, and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in the following schedule:

"Whether the transfer of Shri Nabin Chandra Patra, Lamp Issue Clerk from Bejdih Colliery to Bhanora Colliery from the 13th November, 1964 and his subsequent dismissal from the 8th February, 1965, by the management of Bejdih Colliery were justified? If not, to what relief is he entitled?"

2. According to the case of the union, Nabin Chandra Patra had been serving at Bejdih colliery as Lamp Issue clerk for about 24 years. He had been attend- ing to his duties at Bejdih from his village home at Mithani situated at a distance of about one mile from Bejdih colliery. There was some litigation over land between the workman, Nabin Chandra Patra, and the management and also between the workman's sister and the management. The management was annoyed with the workman on account of such litigation and therefore passed an order dated 13th November, 1964, transferring the workman to Bhanora colliery situated at a distance of about 20 miles from Bejdih colliery; but a copy of the transfer order was obtained by the workman only on 26th December, 1964. The workman however had been suffering from filarial fever from 16th November, 1964; he was treated at the colliery dispensary at Bejdih and was referred to Sanctorla hospital where he got treatment as an outdoor patient from 19th February, 1965 and as an indoor patient from 10th March, 1965 to 13th March, 1965. In the meantime he received an order passed by the manager of Bhanora colliery, dated 8th February, 1965, dismissing him from service. The workman made a representation to the Chief Mining Engineer by a letter, dated 17th March, 1965, and the C.M.E. gave him a chance to foin Bhanora colliery by 12th April, 1965; but when the workman asked for suitable accommodation at Bhanora and for transport facilities to Bhanora the management did not give any reply and ultimately informed him that the order of dismissal, dated 8th Febru- ary, 1065, would stand. According to the union, the order of transfer as well as the order of dismissal is bad and therefore the workman is entitled to reinstate- ment with wages for the period of non-employment.

3 According to the management, the plea that the management was annoyed with' the workman because of civil litigation over land was raised more than a year after the order of dismissal had been passed i.e., by the union's letter, dated 7th April, I960 to the A.L.C., Central, Asansol, and there wa3 no substance in that contention. The raising of coal at Bejdih colliery had been falling sharply and the management was compelled to transfer workmen from Bejdih to other collieries belonging to Messrs Equitable Coal Company Limited, and Nabin Patra's transfer was one such transfer and was made m good faith and in accord- ance with the standing orders to which all the workmen were subject Nabin Chandra Patra was aware of the order of transfer shortly after it had been made for he filed a petition, dated 27th November, 1964 to the C.M.R against the order of transfer and the C.M.E. replied by a letter dated 3rd December, 1964 that the order of transfer could not be cancelled and must be carried out; but the workman still failed to carry out the order of transfer and therefore he was liable to dismissal for unauthorised absence over 10 days from his place of work, namely Bhanora colliery to which he had been transferred The manager, Bhanora colliery issued a chargesheet, dated 5th December, 1964, for unauthorised absence for over 10 days by registered post to Nabin Chandra Patra- as Nabin Patra did not send any reply, another chargesheet, dated 11th January, 1965 was sent by registered post to him. To the second chargesheet also no reply was sent by NaBin Patra, but after issuing notice of the date of enquiry, an ex-parte enquiry was held at which the charge was found proved ana on the basis of the report of the enquiring officer the manager with the approval of the C.M.E. passed an order of dismissal on 8th February, 1965, and thePo?!er of dismissal was valid. Subsequently as a s p e^ U T Q ^ U T N I IS irave a chance to Nabin Patra to join at Bhanora by 12th April, 3 965 but JNat>m K d ra Patra did not avail of the offer thus made but raised questions of ac- commodation and transport faculties in order to avoid the transfer and accOrd- i n g ™ he Znagement w^s justified in holding that the order of dismissal passed on 8th February, 1965, would stand.

4 Nabin Chandra Patra deposed as PW 2 before the tribunal and stated that

tkm that' In the company's registers and papers his name was recorded as Nabin

•Chandra Patra. He claimed that once in a letter in 1960 he mentioned his alias Uma Prasanna Patra to the company, but no such letter could be proved, as the original was not called for. It has been urged by Sri Monoj K. Mukherjee on behalf of the management that there is nothing to show that the company was aware that Uma Prasanna Patra who filed the title suit over a land against the company was their employee Nabin Chandra Patra. In his letter, Ext. A, dated 27th November, 1964, against the order of transfer there is no reference to any civil litigation between Nabin Chandra Patra and the company. Even in the representation made on 19th March, 1965 (Ext. 11) after Nabin Patra had received the order of dismissal there is no mention of any civil litigation between himself and the company* The civil litigation was mentioned for the first time in the union's letter to the A.L.C.. Central, Asansol, dated 7th April, 1966, more than a year after the order of dismissal had been passed. In the circumstances it is not possible to hold that the management passed the order of transfer against Nabin Chandra Patra because he had filed a Civil suit against the management. Shri S. N. Banerjee has urged that according to the evidence of MW-1, Amitabha Ghosh, there were three Lamp Issue clerks for the three shifts of Bejdih includ- ing Nabin Chandra Patra and so the transfer of Nabin Patra was uncalled for, even if there was surplus staff elsewhere. But MW 1 has stated that after the order of transfer was passed, no new man has been appointed in place of Nabin Patra, the work being apparently done by a lamp-in-charge. The order of trans- fer was made in accordarc ° with the Standing Orders and could not be held to be a imalafide order. I must hold therefore that the order of transfer passed on 13th November, 1964 was justified.

5. Next, there is the question whether the dismissal with effect from 8th February, 1965, was justified. The order of transfer is Ext. 1; it directs that as from 23rd November, 1964. Nabin Patra's name should be removed from the Tolls of Bejdih and put on the rolls of Bhanora colliery; i.e., Nabin Patra was to join at Bhanora colliery by 23rd November, 1964. According to Nabin Patra the order of transfer was sent to him by registered post and he received it on 26th December, 1964. In support of this case Nabin Patra produced the cover of the registered letter, Ext. 1A by which he received the transfer order Ext. 1. The cover staows the date of issue as 24th December, 1964 and the date of service 26th December, 1964. The Peon Book, Ext. C, shows that attempt was made to serve the transfer order by Peon 'Book on 17th November, 1964, but it did not succeed. Nabin Patra was however clearly aware of the transfer order long before 26th December, 1964 for on 27th November, 1964, he made a representation to the C.M.E. against Jthe order of transfer (Ext. A); the representation was refused by the C.M.E.'i: letter, dated 3rd December, 1964, Ext. 2, which was admittedly received by Nabin Patra. Nabin Patra's case is that he had become ill of filarial fever and other ailments from 16th November, 1964 and so he remained at his village home at Mithani and the management treated him as still employed at Bejdih colliery in spite of the fact that an order of transfer had been passed. There is indeed some documentary evidence in support of this ror,'e:n<:'on T'~ -t. 7 is a letter from the manager of Bejdih colliery to Nabin Chatsdr', Pe-r? ' ng that Nabin Patra had reported sick on 16th November. ¹964. for f1"r?a] f. v-• nd that after that he had not been attending the dispensary regularly nor rep.rt.ting to the medical officer: the manager directed Nabin Patra to appear at &?t>c u*ia hospital for examination by the Chief Medical Officer. As to the c-ai". 1?",, ° is some overwviting in this letter. The original date of the letter appears: to h?.ve been 6th January, 1965 and Nabin Patra was directed to appear before the C.M.O., 'Sanctoria hospital on 8th January, 1965 at 8 a.m.; the date of the letter was alter- ed to 20th January, 1965 and the date of appearance before the C.M.O. to 25th January, 1965. There is nothing to show when and by whom the dates were altered. But even accepting the original dates, it appears that on 6th January, 1965, long after the Chief Mining Engineer had by his letter, dated 3rd Decem- ber, 1964, Ext. 2, refused to cancel the transfer order, the manager of Bejdih colliery was treating Nabin Patra as employed at Bejdih colliery. According to Nabin Patra, when he received the letter, Ext. 7, the date for appearance before the C.M.O. of Sanatoria hospital had already expired and he informed the manager accordingly and thereupon the manager issued another letter, Ext. 9, addressed to the C.M.O., Sanctoria hospital stating that Nabin Chandra Patra, Lamp Issue clerk, was suffering from chronic filarial fever and that he might be examined to ascertain whether he was fit for his work. This letter also contains an overwriting as to the date. The original date appears to have been 15th February, 1965 and this has been altered to 19th February, 1965. But whether the date is 15th February or 19th February. 1965, the letter was being issued by the manager, Bejdih colliery describing Nabin Chandra Patra as a Lamp Issue •clerk, meaning that he was a Lamp Issue clerk of Bejdih colliery. Thus tacitly the manager was treating him still employed at Bejdih colliery in his original

post as Lamp Issue clerk, although he was absenting himself on account of sick- ness, a,hd although the Manager must have been aware of the transfer order, Nabxn, patra's evidence is that he appeared with the letter Ext. 9 before the C.M.O., Sanctoria hospital for the first time on 19th February, 1965, and there- after he was admitted as an indoor patient on 10th March, 1965, though he wasr discharged after 3 days on 13th March, 1984. Ext. 8 is the discharge certificate issued Dy the Sanctoria hospital. Therein the patient Is described as Nabin Chandra" Patra, Lamp Issue clerk, Bejdih colliery. The medical authorities of Sanctoria hospital reported that Nabin Patra was fit for duty but recommended 7 days' leave from the date of discharge certificate, 13th March, 1965. Accord- ing to Nabin Patra's evidence he appeared with this certificate before the mana- ger, Bejdih colliery and asked for work, but the manager asked him to approach the C.M.E. and thereafter Nabin Patra wrote the letter Ext. 11 to the C.M.E. on 19th March, 1965, stating about his illness and his treatment and discharge from the Sanctoria hospital, and stating that owing to his illness when he received the order of transfer to Bhanora he could not join at Bhanora colliery; but that the manager at Bhanora colliery had sent a letter of dismissal to him. It was on receiving this letter that the C.M.E. gave a chance to Nabin Patra to join at Bhanora by 12th April, 1965, vide letter Ext. 4. But Nabin Patra failed to avail of the chance given to him.

6. The question in this Reference case however is not about Nabin. Patra's non- compliance with the order to join at Bhanora by 12th April, IMS, but about the validity of the earlier order of dismissal, dated 8th February, 1965, an order passed not by the management of Bejdih colliery, as stated in the Reference order, but by the manager of Bhanora colliery. The Manager, Bhanora colliery had also received a copy of the transfer order, Ext. 1. As Nabin Patra did not join at Bhanora colliery, he issued one chargesheet for absence for over 10 days on 5th December, 1964, and as he did not receive any reply he issued a second chargesheet dated 11th January, 1965; both were sent by registered post. Nabin Patra's evidence is that he did not receive either chargesheet, but he admitted the acknowledgement receipts, Ext. B and B/2 along with which the 2 charge- sheets were sent by registered post, Nabin Patra said that as he was ill at the time he did not peruse the contents, of those covers and that subsequently when he looked at his papers he could not find any chargesheet. He said Chat he received the notice of enquiry in respect of the second chargesheet, the notice of enquiry being Kxt. 3, but that he did not attend the enquiry fixed for 29th January 1965, at Bhanora because he did not receive the chargesheet. Since however Nabin Patra signed the acknowledgement receipts, Ext. B and B2 it must be held that he had received the two chargesheets; clearly he had omitted to reply to them as he was trying to avoid the transfer to Bhanora. Ext. D js the copy of the second chargesheet dated 11th January, 1965 containing the recommendation of the manager for dismissal on the basis of the report of the enquiring officer and the order of the C.M.E. approving of the order of dismissal. In view of all this evidence, oral and documentary, the order of dismissal might be held to be valid if in the meantime the manager of Bejdih had not treated Nabin Patra as still employed at Bejdih colliery and so waived the- transfer Order In view of this conduct of the manager of Bendih Nabin Patia might not unreasonably conclude that the order of transfer was no longer in force That being so, it must follow that the order of dismissal by the manager of Bhanora was not justified in the circumstances.

7 Shri S N Banerjee for the union has sought to justify the conduct of Nabin Chandra Patra'in not availing of the chance given to hm to join at Bhanora by 12th April, 1965, stating that Nabin Patra was entitled to smtble accommodation at Bhanora before he acted on the order of transfer In such a case even tnough a workman may claim to be provided with suitable accommodation he shoufd first obey the order of transfer. It is not however necessary to consider thisi noint; In detail, because we are not concerned in this case with the non- c o m p ? C c e ^ i ™e

8 My award therefore is that the transfer of Shrl Nabin Chandrai Patra

  7                                                                   13-7-67
    (c)  Whether  the  non-employment  of  the  following  workers  with  effect  from
the  dates  mentioned  against  them  is  justified?
  i   Sri N. N. Singh                Overman                         8-7-67
  3  Sri Ganori Routh

5  Sri  Suraj  Singh                                                 14-8-67
6  Sri Panu Mia                     Works Supervisor  .              27-7-67
7   Smi.  Chflri Mum                Hard  Coke Kamin  .              27-7-67
8  Sm\  Sumri  Mudin                      Do.                        27-7-67