Subject NOT available

as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from th" date of this Order,

[No. UIVHP/4/e7(3).]

New Delhi, the 30th October 198IT

S-O. 4061 .—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Veljibhal Shankerhhai Motka a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from Surendranagar constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses within the time and In the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;

And whereas, after considering the representation made by the said candidate, the Election Commission is further satisfied that he has no good reason or justifica- tion for the failure;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Com- mission hereby declares the said Shri Veljibhal Shankerbhai Motka to be disquali- fied for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three yean from the date of this order-

[No. GJ-HP/2/67-]

By order,

K. S. RAJAGOPALAN, Secy-

MINISTRY OF LAW

(Legislative Department)

New Delhi, the 8th November 1967

S-O. 4062.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub- section (3) of section 1 of the Wakf Act, 1954 (29 of 1954), the Central Government hereby directs that the said Act shall come into force on the Twentieth day of November, 1967, in that part of the Union Territory of Himachal Pradesh in which It is not already in force.

[No. 1/11/67-Waqf:]

M. H. DIN,

Director (Wakfs).

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 6th November 1967

S.O. 4063—In! exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Emigra- tion Act, 1922 (VII of 1922), the Central Government hereby appoint Shri R. Muthuswamy, Protector of Emigrants, Nagapattinam to be Protector of Emi- grants, Mandapam Camp and Tuticorin in addition to his own duties with effect from the afternoon of October 13, 1967 to November 1, 1967 vice Shri T- C Nithyanandam, Protector of Emigrants, Mandapam C∓ and Tuticorin proceed- ed on leave.

[No. CPEO/21/67-] [No. V.IV/601/3/67.]

A, K. NAG,

Chief Passport Officer.

RDNISTRY OF HOME A^FFAIRS

New Delhi, the 8th November 1967

S-O. 4065—In pursuance of clause (b) of rule 2 of the Citizenship Rules, 1956, the Central Government hereby appoints the City Magistrate, Udaipur, to per- form the functions of the Collector under the said rules in respect of the Udafpur District in the State of Rajasthan and directs that the following further amend- ment shall be made in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs, No. 10/3/56-IC, dated the 8th November, 1956, namely:—

In the Schedule to the said notification, for the entries "Sub Divisional Officer and Dev. Officer, Udaipur" and "Udaipur. Sub-Division" occurring in columns 1 and 2, the entrieg "City Magistrate, Udaipur" and "Udajpur District" shall, respectively, be substituted.

[No. 23/2/67-1. C]

C. L. GOYAL, Under Secy.

MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

(Office of the Chief Controller of Imports & Exports)

ORDER

New Delhi, the 6th November 1967

8.0. 4066—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause 9 of the Imports (Control) Order, 1953, dated the 7th December, 1956, as amended, the undersign- ed hereby cancels the Import Licence No- G/RC/208B738/R/IA/23/CH/21, dated 31st May, 1966 (fully unutilised) for the import of 'Lenses Spread-Lite 30 degrees Inside stepped clear 4" focus 8-3/4" dla- for multiunlt colour to BSS 623-1940, Light Long Range as per mfrer. Drg. No. M2421 RDSO S/6451' falling under S. No. 52/11 of I.T.C. Schedule valued at Ru. 370 issued In favour pi M/s. Slta-. nautb Law and Co., Calcutta.

The reason for cancellation is that the goods covered under this licence have been Included In another Rly. Order No- Stores/8/66/PSI/Gr,.2B-29/3B/A0090, dated 1st July, 1967, against wWdh a licence No- G/*tC/20862fl4, dated 21st Auguirt, Ifl87, for Rs. 34,833 has been Issued-

[No. 13-S/Rlr/66-67/GLS/779.]

S. A. SESHAN,

Dy. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports.

(Office of the Chief Controller of Imports & Exports)

ORDER

New Delhi, the 1th November 1967

S-O. 4087.—The Principal, M.BM. Engineering CoOlege, Jodhpur were granted an Import licence No. A S31732/59/AU/CCI dated 22nd February, 1960 for Us. 10,550 (rupees ten thousand five hundred & fifty only). They have applied for the issue of a duplicate customs purpose copy of the said licence on the ground that the original customs purpose copy has been lost/misplaced. It Is further stated that the original customs purpose copy was registered with the customs authorities at Bombay and utilised partly. It was utilised for Rs. 5,333 and th" balance available on it was Rs- 5,217.

2. In support of this contention, the applicant has filed an affidavit from Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Jodhpur. I am accordingly satisfied that the original custom* purpose copy of the said licence has been lost. Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under Sub-clause 9(cc) of the Imports (Control) Order 1963 dated 7th December, 1955 as amended, the said original customs purpose copy of licence No. A 831732/59/AU/C.C.I dated 22nd February, I960 issued to the Principal, M-BM. Engineering College, Jodhpur is hereby cancelled,

3. A duplicate customs purpqsel copy of the said licence is being issued separately to the licensee.

[No. Tech./M-42/160/LVD/ILS.]'

S. K. USMANI,

Dy. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports-

HDOsrvr OF roaAscx

4 2 3 8

(DapartHKBt of Economic Affairs)

New Delhi, the 6th November 1967

T H K

S O. 4068,-StuaacBl at the Affitii* of ibeRetenv Bank of India ss cm t be 27^1 October 1967.

BANDNS DlPiBTMENT

G A Z E T T E

AJBETI

LunLrraa

Bs.

O F

I

N D

I

A

:

N O HS

Capital Paid Up

36^80,11^00

9,96^000

R c a c ro P U IMI

•

•

•

.

•

8,O0

1 SmaO CoiD

3^81^00

N O V E M B E R

Bitlt Pnrchwed utd DttcoyiHed *—

1 8

, Nrfn|>) AtfV"^"™¹ Tr""t (I^n£ T"*m

r3irficMxw"o

(a) Internal

Ojxatkm) Fnad

1 9 6 7

/

(ft) Extern]

(e) G o T t n n n em T r e m o iy B f lN . . ..

229^9^ MO

K A R T

I

Natknal Agricntarel Credit (Sub&mksa) Fmw .

B d n c e* H e ld A b n M d* . - . . ..

K A

2O^8,O9TO00

U T O u D r DQ • • ,

2 7

, tTattoni) Indaapitl Cwdit (Long TennOpentiom)

L o au a ad A d n o c e* to 1—

1 8 8 9

[

fO C e n t r al G o r e i u m e ur

• •

P A K T

(U) S t a te G o T e m m e n t* fi

92,42,57,00^

I I -

Deposits i —

Loans and Advances to :—

(0 Scheduled Commercial Banks f

6"76'35"ooo

t (a) Government

(tf) State Co-operative Banksft

'78,33.9^000

(itf) Others

2,49,80,000

(0 Central Government

6 6 , 6 3 " 5 5 " "M Loans, Advances and Investment* from National Agricul- tural Credit (Long Term Operation*) Fundi—

3

4,15,27,000

(I'O State Governments

(d) Loans and Advances to :—

(0 State Governments

. . ..

w o

(it) State Co-oFM"ive Banks

28,24,26,000

13,92,23,000

(m) Central Land Mortgage Banks

{b EaDis

3

(*) Investment in Central Land Mortgage Bank Debenture s

7 45>95.oco

Loans and Advances from National Agricultural Cred t

(0 Scheduled Commercial baton . .

(Stabilisation) Fund:—

Loans and Advances to State Co-operative Banks

(n) Scheduled State Co-operative Bants

S.45.9O.OCO

(iii) Non-Scheduled State Co-operative Backs

Loans, Advances and Investments from National Indust'i

w o 5 a £

Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund:—

138,46,80,000

5,i3,74>ooo

70,40,000

7,61,000

(id) Other Bants

(a) Loans and Advances to the Development Bank

5,24,15,000

o

275.12,09,000

(b) Investment in bonds/debentures issued by the

ic) Others

Development Bank

Other Assets

33,83,98,ooo

Bills Payable

Other Liabilities

37'33>69>ooo

48,78,12,000

847,41,27,000

Rupees

Rupees

847>4i>27,ooo

I 5

00 to Ci 'Includes Cash and Short-term Securities.

••Excluding investments from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund and the National Industrial Credit (Long Term

Operations) Fund.

§ ©Excluding Loans and Advances from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund, but including temporary overdrafts to State Governments.

H >

KJ tlacludes Rs. N IL advanced to scheduled commercial banks against usance bills under section i7(4Xc) of the Reserve Bank of India ACT. ftExcluding Loans and Advances from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund and the National Agricultural Credit (Stabili- sation) Fund.

Dated the ist'day of November, 1967.

t

MS

Aa Account pursuant to the Reserve Bank of IndU Act, 1914, Cor

4 2 4 0

I t S Ul DflPABTMBHT

ASSETS

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

Lusamn

T H E

36^0,11,000

Gold Coin and Bullion :—

Notes held in tlrcBaiteg Department.

115,89,25,000

2936.05168,000

(a) Held in India .

(t) Held outside Indis .

Note* in cfawttttkw

G A Z E T T E

2972,8 5"79/"o

Toty NaM"4(Mtd .

Foreign Securities • . • .

166,42,00,000

O F

I

N D

I

A

:

282,31)25,000

80,57567,000

2609,96,87,000

TOTAL .

Rupee Cob . . .

Government of India Rupee Securities

Internal Bills of Exchange and

other commercial paper

N O V E

TOTAL ASSETS

2972.85"79.ooo

T o m. LuaajTiB*

2972385*79.000

Dated the 1st day of November 1967,

M B E R

L. K. JHA,

Governor,

1 8

,

[No. F.3(3)-W3/67,l

V. SWAMINATHAN, Under Secy.

1 9 6 7

/

K A R T

I

K A

2 7

.

1 8 8 9

[

P A

" T

U

-

(Department of Reveanei and Insnramee)

INCOME-TAX

New Delhi, the 13th October 1967

¹

2

4

3

5

¹

2

J

5

I NAMES OF ALL INDIVIDUALS AKD H.U. Fs. /SSFSSFD CN IKCCJ^E CM It RS. I LAKH IN THE FINANCIAL YEAR "(1965-66)"

]. Name and address of the aiscssee

Status

Income

AsscBEmcnt

year-

s No

assessed

under I. T.

Act, 1961

[ 2 ]

3

4

5

A N D H RA PRADESH

Azam Jah Bahadur (Prince), Hyderabad .

I

Indl.

. 1961-63

, Baslat Jah Bahadur (Sahebzada) Hyderabad

2

I0J02J2O5

10,94,921

11,82,816

11,01,862-

7.11.903

/** IO7"

4,C7^42i

2,87^11

C. Ramanadha Babu, Challapalli, Krishna DIstt.1

|. Durreshwar (Princess), Hyderabad

| HUP. Indl.

3 4

3,16,133.

D. B. Ramgopal, Secundrabad.

HUF.

5

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1065-66

7WJ ****

1964-65

I965-fi6

I96I-63

I96I-63

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

1957-58

I96I-62

3>53J76I

3.82,405

- 3*57*3.73

2,29,608-

5,i6^34

1,58,872

D. M. Berdlne c/o Caltex Oil Refineries (India)

6

Ltd., Visakhapatnam

Indl.

7

T n^t"OI

TrtR-CTT

1 JOOJ5 A f

"1 "1

10

11

j#

"j

re

J7

18

"] "A

19

20

I Q 6 * _ 66

21

"1

U

if

Jju*J*rrJ

MM

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

i,u,485

1,97,563

2,56,406

2,39^367

S. Krishna Rao, Prop: Citizen Press, Park Lane,

30

Secundrabad

S. G. D a s t g i r, H y d e r a b ad . . ..

H U F. Indl.

31

W

1963-64

1963-64

1964-65

1961-62

1965-66

I,i6,97?

I,OO,29"

1,07^19

3^8,000

1,53^814

33 33 34

1965-66

1,15,16*

S a l ar J u ng E s t a t e, D i w "n D e v d l, H y d e r a b ad Sabzadi Begum, Hyderabad Smt. Thota Venkata Bharathamma, Machillpat- nam . . . . . ..

Virlndavanlal Goverdhanlal, Begum Bazar,

35

IJ49J426

Hyderabad

1962-63

H U F.

ASSAM

Indl.

1963-64

1961-62

1963-64

1,04,027

1,50,871

1,93,605

A.G. Bruce, Tinsukia, Dirt, Lakhimpur .

Achar Singh Jorhat, Dist. Sibaagar

Bachan Singh, Shillong . . ..

B a n s i d h ar B a d r i d aa M o d i, D i b r u g a r h, D i s t.

3" 37 38 39

L a k h i m p ur

H U F. Indl.

H U F. Indl.

1963-64

1962-63

1965-66

1961-62

1965-66

1,69.349

1,10,834

1,06,325

1,04,808

1,06,325

B a s u d ar S a r r n a, A g a t t a la . . ..

C h a n m al S a i a u e i, G a u h a ti . . ..

Duliabam T.E. Khowang, Distt. Lakhimpur

Ganpatrai Sareugi, Gaubati . . ..

Girdharlmal Sandhannal, Dibrugarh, District

40 4* 43 43 44

H U F. Indl. "

is

HUF.

Indl.

1961-62

1963-64

1965-66

1961-62

1964-65

1965-66

1961-62

1965-66

2,07,110

I,3I389O

1,19^17

2,10,822

1,05,716

1,01,162

1,00,510

1,22,623

Lakhimpur . . . . ..

Legal Successor of Late H. C. Hcwkings, Digboi

J. E. Marsda, c/o A.O.C. Ltd., Digboi

Smt. Kishari Devi Saharia, Dibrugarh

Kuljit Dhanoa, Shillong . . . .

Prabhudayal Bidawatka, Gauhati

Ramnaravan Nandlal, Haibargaon, Ditt. Nowgong

S a n t o kh S i n g h, G a u h a ti . . ..

Tididevi Agarwala, Successor of late Meghraj

45 4" 47 48 49 50 51 52

1,29,626

Agarwala Haibargaon, Dlstt Nowgong .

1962-63

it

BIHAR &ORISSA

1,02,814

IJ92J453

HUF.

Indl.

Eliphinston Picture Palace, Patna . ,

H. C. Vershi, Kandra . . . ..

Lai Narain Sinha, Advocate, Patna

a

33 54 55

HUF. Indl. HUF.' Indl. "

Maganlal Kara, Baripsda . . ..

Manager, Court of •wards, Bctiah

Misrllal Dharamchand, Cbaibasa

Mrs. N. K. Briant . . . ..

S. C. Vershei, Kandra .

1965-66

I965-66

1965-65

1965-66

1965-66

1964-65

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

56 57 58 59 60

M,

I,58,9I<"

1,18,536

1^)4,283

2>99yt7i

1,00,577

4,55,201

1.59,853

BOMBAY CITY-I

61

i9"a-63

Indlt

A.D. Shroff, C/oShriN.A. Shroff, Executor*

of the estate of lateShri A . D. Shroff, Agfa

India, Khetan Bhavan, Jamshed Ji Tata Road,

Churchgate, Bombay . . ..

3.39.543

3^9^91

J"72rf>86

i,i6,O7

538S

6:

1 Mrs. A.E. Cown, C/o A.F. Ferguson & Co.,

Allahabad Bank Building, Appollo Street,

Bombay

Indl.

1960-61

13,368

1,04,716

Indian

Income

T.W.I.

1962-63

I5>596

Indian

Income

T.W.I.

1963-64

131070

Incomo

T.W.J.

8,986

i9"4-65

i,o

Iadia"

Income

T.W.i.

A.E.Hawke, Burmah Shell Oil &Stg. Co.Ltd.,

"3

Bombay

"1

M9^98

1,53^83

Sir A.G. Gray, C/o The Bank of India, Fort,

"4

Bombay

3,368

i""4-fi5

"1

1,58^11

Indian

Income

T.W.i.

A.H. Ahmed Bhoy,GingaVUUr, Marine Drive,

"J

SI

Bombay . . . . . ..

i9"3-"4

1964-65

1.37.330

Ij23,854

W . 5 73

AX. Gole, Anglo Thai Corps.. Ballard Haute,

Bombay j . ,

I9&4-65

1.34.718

"r

A. Woodwork. C/o M/i. HindusUn Lever Ltd.,

HinduiUn Lever House, Backbay Reclama*

tlon, Bombay-i

"

"

I963-M

1965-66

1,08,314

1,16,333

AbdulkS.Batam, 393 Magdevi Street, Bombay

Abdolla A.S.Benamj 393 Nagdevi Strom, Bora-

48 "9

IO65-66

bay .

70

ft

1^3,613

Adi B.Dabaihc/oArdeshir B.Cum"01 ft Son*

(P) Ltd., 6, Rampart Row, Fort,Booit"y-l .

!mt. Alia D. Cawasji, c/o M/". D. CaMitti* Co..

If

I$"5-6S

u

3,31,871

4.03,579

V J * '

i"4, M.O. HOMI. Bombay-r . ..

i n t o* MlM*^MifatlalHou"c,Fort,Bombay.

Una f5yrt£Bm> Teitil* Mecb. Mfg. Co.,

Worll, BSfiSSy

1.78,761

l9"a-63

"1

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

i)85=5H

1^95)904

.1,87,048

1961-62

1,11,975

B.D. Garware,Dominianf*——™ i^td., Bombay B.G. Athavale, Plot No. "198,' Smruti" 60- Feet

75 76

Road, Ghatkopar (East) Bombay-77 .

33

B.K. Dubash, c/o Ardeshir B. Cursetji & Sons

77

(P) Ltd., 6-Rampart Row, Fort, Bombay

1965-66

1964-65

1965-66

33

1,92,676

1)33)609

I,49)6OI

B.S. Billimoria, c/o M/s. S.B. Billimoria & Co.

78

33

113 M.G. Road, Bombay-i

1965-66

IJ62,373-

B.S. Kotwal, c/o M/s. Mira Suit Works Co.,

79

33

408 Sheikh Memon Street, Bombay .

1963-64

IJ37)86I

80 Bachubai F.E. Dinshaw, c/o National & Grind-

3i

lays Bank Ltd., M.G.Road, Bombay .

1964-65

4,52,512-

81 Smt. Badmadevi Agarwal, Kamani House, Pod-

1965-66

dar Road, Bombay . . ..

1,16,928:

81-A

33

The Bank of India & Others, Trustees of the Trust dated 6-10-1955 created by late H.H. Maharaja Shri Mahendra Singhji of Morvi, M.G. Road, Bombay . . ..

1964-65

1965-66

r,2i,837

i)37)00O-

82 Bahubeli Gulabchand, Construction House,

33

Ballard Estate, Bombay . . ..

1965-66

M3)4O5

83

33

1962-63

Estate of Balakumari by Genl. Shankar S.S.J.B. Rana, 3OBelgraves Square, London, S.W.i .

i3io,8i5

C.A. Young, Esso Standard Eastern Inc.,

84

Bombay, . . . . , • , .

C.B. Thomas, Esso Standard Eastern Ind., Bombay

85

1963-64

1964-65

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

1)47.489-

1,47,368

2)5°"6i9

2.55*138"

2)55.138;

1965-66

fi,6i,O5i

C.H. Bhabha,49 Cuffe Parade, Colaba,Bombay-5

C.F. Hederley, Firestone Rubber and Tyre Co.,

86 87

Haybunder Road, Bombay

33

1965-66

1)30.944

C.W. Cough, Esso Standard Eastern Inc., Bom-

88

"

bay

1963-64

i,52,75":

Estate of Clara Eveline, Trust Nevelle House,

89

Ballard Estate, Bombay-1

s,

1964-65

1965-66

I.33.I4O-

1.32,790-

C. Chesbrough, Esso Standard Eastern Inc.,

90

Bombay

1964-65

1,22,732

Chimanlal Daulat Ram c/o M/s. Chimanlal

91

ii

Mohanlal &Co., HanumanBldg.,Tambakanta,

Bombay-2

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

143.999 I . 4 9 , 7 8I 1,80,384 Mrs. D.M.Turner, C/o M/s. A.F., Matvey Ltd.,

92

ii

Madurai

3.55.104

1965-66

D . R . D. Tata, Bombay House, Bruce Street,

93

Fort, Bombay . . ..

3J

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

3.46,572

2.22,393

.2,06,885-

D.R- Chaudhry, c/o Greagson Batley & King,

94

Chartered Bank Building, Fort, Bombay

,5

1,27,184

1,63,791

1964-65

1965-66

D.R. Geddis,. National & Grindlays Bank Ltd.,

95

1963-64.

1,24,363.

Bombay , . . . . .

D; Tour Sandoz (I) Ltd.} Wrttet Road, B.E.,

96

",oo,o7o"

1962-63

Bombay ,

4 2 46 ' • • — ••

1 8- • J

. 2 7. II > [ P A K T I I-I 2 3 4 5 David MudicWept Furry,Scotland

14,068

1964-65

I , 4 5 . 8 8I Income Indian

T.W.I.

Dyaldas Khuahi Ram, 68 Marine Drive, Bom-

4,8

bay-i

1963-66

1,05,012

„

Dahyalal M. Zaveri, c/o Dahyalal M. Zaveri,

99

,i

98 Sk. Memon St., Bombay

1964-65

1,16,628

5 00 Dalpatbhai Chandulal Mehta, c/o M/s. Mohan lal Raichand & Sons, 78/83 Sk. Memon St., Bombay . . . .

ti

1,17,986

1964-65

Dattatrya M. Dahanukar, Industrial Assurance

* 0I

Bide,, Fort, Bombay . . ..

3J

3,65,504

IJ53.757

1965-66

1961-62

Demal Haasanand, B.E, Hall, Bombay Devilal Bherulal Kothari, 74 Sk. Memon Street,

1 02 1 03

1965-66

Bombay . . . . . ..

1,42,000

Dharmlnder Doel., Hemkund No. 1, Flat No.

2 04

1,80,875

10, i4thRoad,Bandra,Bombay .

1965-66

"

Dwarkadas Verhomal Punjabi, c/o M/s.Hotchand

tios

1961-62

3>

1,00,983

Motumal, 331 Dr. D.N. Road, Bombay Mrs. E.A. Guhi, 7 Avenue Doll Hopsfl Swit-

J 06

zerland

H

B.F. E. 6Dinshaw' c/o National & Grlndlays

1 07

Bank Ltd., M. G. Road, Bombay.

1965-66

1964-65

1964-65

1965-66

1,02,590

4,57.025

I,59J5<2

1,77.595

1 08 C09

E.M. Billimoria, H.C.C. Ltd. Bombay. . Indl. E.O. Austin, George Oakes (P) Ltd., Swadeshi Mills Compound, Opera House, Bombay ,

"

1 10 E.P. Bharucha, 251 Dr.D. N. Road, Bombay .

1965-66

1966-67

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1,24,949

I.74.5I3

1,84,231

1.41.949

i.39)8i7

Est. Mrs. E.S. Robertson, 24, Bounswick Road,

i ll

Dongla* Isloofmen.

>l

1,11,760

1964-65

F.A.M. Fazalbhoy, c/o Photophone Equipment

S I2

1,11,412

It

Ltd., New Marine Lines, Bombay

1963-64

"3

,,

IJI9J7I6

1964-65

F.A. Klaser, Esso Standard Eastern Inc. Co. Ltd., Bombay . . . . ..

414

1965-66

1,17,651

"

F.H. Kemple, c/o M/s. Forbes Forbes Campbell ACo.Forbes Buildinj, Home Street, Bombay F. A. Roberton, 24 Bounswick Road, Donglas

J I5

1,11,760

Isloofmen

1964-65

1,22,881 Income Indian

T.W.I.

F. Perouneyer, Indian Casablaoka Gs.Ltd., 127

J6

at

M.G. Road, Bomb"y

1964-65

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

I109.476

1^1,900

142476

1*44.500

G. B. Khatry, M/s. Shanta Bros., Vaswani

*I7

1961-62

1,20,382

"

M xnsion, Dinsha Vacha Rd., Bombay.

J I8

>i

G.L. Mirchaniani, c/o India Book Home, 249 r>.N. R^al, B u n ny . . ..

1961-62 1962-63

I.22J33I

1.16,907

G.M. Rwe, c/o M/s. Didji Dhakji* Co. Ltd.,

C19

1964-65

1.07,386

>>

Stirl Pant Bhavan, Sandhurst Bridje, Bom- bay-4

Si

JJ

J i ll

G,R. Pribii, C/J M/s. Bjn'jay Mercantile.Cor-

pnratioa, 211/217 Nagdevl Street, Bombay

G.WutisInij Protoi Ei3g. Co. Ltd., Banabay .

1964-65 1961-62

1,06,126

1.73.501

1 22 GiajaprasadK. M.irarka;,24_lJ Road,

Bombay . .

.

Indl.

1955-56 1956-57 1957-58

2.58,311

2,35J3O2

I,99>34O

.11$

George Lireti, c/o D.D. ShioiT v:>., Stadium House, Veer Nariman Road, Bombay . . , .,

1961-62'

1961-62

1,12,117 Indian 48,000 Income

M3,°co

•

73.100

1,731O53 TWl

124

ft

1964-65

1,06,286

1 25

Smt. Gopabai B. Danuni, Bullion Association Building, S. K. Mcnon Street, Bombay-2 . H. D. Thakar, Oriental Metal Press Works Pvt.

Ltd., Worli, Bombay . . ..

T96i-62

1,08,017

1 26  H.  J.  Vach:i,  c'o M/s  A. F.  Ferguson  &  Co.,
        Allahabad  B .ink Building, Bombay                           1965-66          2,12,731
J 27  H. M. Demist  n, c/o Lloyds  Bank, London                       1965-66         2,13.537
 I2S  H. P. Billimori  , 353, Lamington  Road, Bombay 4
                                                                      1964-65         1,14.757

1129

Lord Hawke, c/o M/S Roffe, Swayno & Co., 50 Lincon'i Lin Fields, London, W.C.2

1960-61

3*

6,020 Indian Income

1.77.754 T.W.I.

1130

Hcmont Blughubhai Seth Trust, Mafatlal

HOJSC, Fort, Bombay . . ..

1965-66

3.43.197

Hcmant Bhi^Lbliai, MafJtlal, Maftttlal House,

* 3i

Fort, Bo nb ,y

1965-66

6,70,662

Hemmt B. M itucUl Seih, Mafatlal House, Fort,

* 32

1965-66

Bombaby . . . . .. HUF

4.43.236

Smt. Hiradevi Agarwal, Kaiiani Home, Poidar

*33

1965-66

Indl.

1,16,908

House, Bombay

134 Hukumchand Bherulal Kothari, 74 Sk. Memon

St., Bombay . . . . ..

1965-66 1965-66

5,16,344 1,25,731 I. M. Ogj, c/o A. F. Ferguson & Co., Bombay . J. B. Hannttj Esso St*ndard Eastern Inc., Bom-

J 35 x)6

1965-66

2,64,233

11

bay

J. C. Heward, EBSO Standard Eastern Inc.,

3 37

Bombay

"

1963-64 1964-65

2,01,708 1,84,474

J. D. Choksi, Bombay House, Bruce Street,

-138

Fort, Bombay

ft

1964-65 1965-66

1,48,444 1,38.030

J. E. Lynn, HISJ Stundird Eastern Inc., Bom-

J 39

bay

„

1,18,259

1,17.518

1963-64 1964-65

A 40

J. I. Brown, Easo Standard Eastern Inc., Bom-

fa ly

,>

,1

fl

1964-65 1965-66 1965-66

1,49.160 1,36.49* 1.04,178 J. L. Bhatia, Bombay , J. K. Thakkar, m - A, M. G. Road, Bombay-i . Trustees of Mrs. J. M. Lumbimoflf Navclle

J 4I J 42 J 43

House, Ballard Estate, Bombay .

"

J. G. Kidd, Glaxo Liboratory, Worll, BorAbay .

1,39.678 1,33.035 1,44,137 1,41,662 1,46,932

JC964-65 1965-66 Z9*rf4*6j 1965-"6 1966-67

. -:

• 18,

,

IKA XI, . \p*xi U~

1964-6^ 1565-66

1,04,166

1,05,613

146 J. R. D. Tata, Bombay Houie, Bruce St., Fort,"

B j m b ^y . . . . . ..

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

2,83,040

2,40,901

2,24,130

J. R. Laughlin, Esso Standard Eastern Inc.,

147

Bombay . . . . . ..

1,44,732

1965-66

Cape. J. R. Mzvantford, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg.

148

Co., Ltd., Bombay . . . * . .

J3

149 J. Scott, Esso Standard Eastern Inc., Bombay

1,17)971' 1,9^983- 1,90,717 1,91,898 1,91,958.

1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

J. T. H M l m J, B a r mm Shell Oil & Stg., Dist.,

ISO

CD., B . E .J Bombay . . . ..

ii

1952-63 1963-64 1964-65

1,02,920-

1,16,787"

1,09,221-

151 J. T. Wollar, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg., Dist., Co., B.E.j Bombay . . . ..

1965-66

i33<5;374

J. W. Tide berg, Esso Standard Eastern Inc.,

152

Bjmbay

It

1952-63 1953-64

1,02,705

1,21,893

James Mcgoe, c/o M/s Pflzer Ltd., 163 Backbay

153

Reclamation, Bombay . . ..

1,14,701

1955-66

154 Jayalaxmi W/o and legal heir of Nigardas Chaturdas Zaveri, 76 Sk. Mcmon St., Born- bay-2 . . . . . ..

1952-63

1.52)723

Jaikishen, Gobind Mahal, 4th Floor, Marine

155

Drive, Bombay

"

1963-64 1964-65

1,78,870- 1)73.569"

155 J. Anderson c/o A. F. Ferguson & Co., Allahabad Bank Building, Bombay . . ..

,,

1965-66

1)55.998

157 Jean B. Dubash, c/o Ardeshir B. Cursetji & Sons, P. Ltd., 6 Rainpart Row, Fort, Bombay-1 .

i*

1964-65

1,13,056.

John Symon, W.H, Brady & Co., Bombay

158

a

T9O5~^* 1962-63 1963-64

1,10,17ft' x,22,348:- 1,34,73*

K. Hoshi Mutto, Bank of Tokyo Ltd., Bombay-

159

10

1961-62

1,04,022-.

„

160

j,

1965-66

I)47J74&-

161

K. A. Dubash, c/o Ardeshir B. Cursetji & S6ns P. Ltd., 6 Rampart Row, Fort, Bombay-l . K. C. Maitra, Guest Keen William* Ltd., Wake-

field House, Billiard Estate, Bombay

JJ

1964-65 1965-66

2,48,636 2,14)540'

162 K. M. Mody, c/o Shrl M. M. Khanna (Advocate) New Empire Cinema Building, Fort, Bom- bay

it

1,11,909

1961-62

163 K. R. T. Mechanic, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg.

Co., Bombay

11

1,32,344

1964-65

164

1964-65

3,10,880

ti

i"5

JJ

1965-66

1^9,627

166

1961-62

it

3,85,800

Kali D. Cawasji, c/o M/s D. Cawasji at Co., 123 M.G. Road, Bombay-i . . .. Mrs. Kasturbai Walchand, Construction House Ballard Estate, Bombay . . , . Kishorekumar Ganguli, Gouri Kunj, Pandym Lane No. 2, Juhu Tara, Juhu Road, Bom- bay . . •*

Sait. Kusumben D. Mahadevia, Mafatlal HOIIM,

i"7

1965-66

1.23,031

tt

Fort, Bombay k

TISS

M. D. R i n e, c/o M/S Dadji & Co., Ltd., Shri

Indl.

Pant Bhavan, Sandhurst Bridge, Bombay- 4

1964-65 1965-66

1,27,641 3^7*563

[69 Mrs. M. E. Walker, 7, Keyton Park, Cardem London . . . , . , ,

.1.1

1963-63

12,250 Indian Income

1.32,464 T.W.I.

T70 M. G. Jifjitiani, Kayce Ind., Kamany Chambers,

Fort, Bombay . . . . ..

iQfli-61

1.00.020

I 7r M. H. Ahmed Bhoy, Ganga Vihar, Marine Drive,

Bombay-i . . . . ..

1962-63

1,01,461

M- I. Patel, Laus Metal & Enamel Iron works

172

I>OI,597

1964-65

173

Lrd., Tul"i Pipe Road Dadar, Bombav. M. K. Shah, Forbes Building, Home Street, Bombay. . . . . ..

I Q 6 < - 66

M. I.,. Dhanukar, Industrial ASR. Building, Fort,

*74

Boinhay . . . . . ..

1965-66

7,40,403

9)

175

If

M. M. Gnmron, c/o P. G. Rao, 84 Annie Basant Rnjd, Bombay . . . . ..

1965-66

2,71,813

176 M. M. Desai, L & T Management, I.C. Houst,

Dougal Road, Ballard Estate, Bombay .

1965-66

3>

i>94.909

177 M. N. Sinclair, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg. Co. Ltd.. Bombay . . . . ..

j>

1965-6*

1,26,160

M. S. Korwil, c/o M/S Mira Salt Works Co.,

178

40S, Sk. Memon St., Bombay

1963-64

I J 2 3 , 9 59

M n e k ' al Premchand, 63 Appollo Street, Fort,

17-5

H ) T l h qy . . . . . ..

1962-63

1,00,292

1 Jo Smt. MaltibT D. Dahnukar, Industrial Aisuranca

' I ' l i l i i i i ' T. F ^ i r t, B o m b ay . . ..

191S5-6S

2,?t,734

1 8:

1964-65

11

Manchhnram Vajcram, Rampura Main Road, Surat, c/o M/S Chhaganlal Maganlid & Co., S!k. Mem vi Street, Bombay

1,01,986

1S2 Maki K. Miatry, c/o Ardeshir B. Cursetji & Sons

1965-66

P. Lta., 6 Rampart Row, Fort, Bombay-1 .

i,i7>43i

T S3 Mchir Tai Sajeeda, Sultan Begum, Ruler of

1961-62

1,64,515 Bhotial, Bhnpal . . . ..

>?

1S4

19S4-65

S~n. MiraKfwani, c/o M/S Indian Engineering Co., J6O Dr. D.N, Road, Bombay

IJ

1,15^93

135

1965-66

"

Mihirkamir Mafatlal, Mafatlal House, Fort, "Romhay . . . . ,,

1.14.095

186 Dr.M. Sageor, 23 Juhu Lane, Andheri, Bora-

I,39,oi8

1965-66

bav-36

Mjhd. Z. Aliraza, Sitaram Building, Dr. D. N.

187

1961-62

Road, Bombay. . . . .

2.54,553

1,22,247

1965-66

">

Mohd. Ali Bassam , 293 Nagdevi St., Bombay . N. G. P ibhu c/o M/S Bombay M"rcantile

188 189

M

Corpn. Nagdcri Street, Bombay

iJ

N, H. TiV.i, Bombay House, Bruce Street, Fort,

190

1964-65 1965-66

1,09,275 I,3Ir43I

Bombay . . . . . ..

If

N. K. Patigara, c/o M/s Mulli & Mulla Craigie

191

1964-65 1965-66

Blunt & Carot, 51 M G. Road, Bombay.

1,62,847 1,73,017

3>

N. K. Santook, c/o M/S ^ ^ 0 —^

I93

1,62,167 1,58,092

1964-65 1965-66

N. M. Billimoria, 393, Lamlnfton Road, Bom-

193

bay . . ..

1961-62 1962-63 1963-64

4,70,062 5,76,018 4,47,379

1,15*416 i,n,838

N. R. Mody, Bombay

195

1964-65 1965-66 1965-66

N.V. Bediani, N. Jeevanlal & Co, L t d. Bombay,

196

>)

1,^,809

1,16,316

1963-63 1963-64

Executors of the Estate of Lnte Seth Navin-

197

Chandra Mafa'lal, Mafailal House, Fort, Bombay . . . . ..

J>

1965-66

2^5,456

O.D. Sowerwone, Esso Standard Eastern I n c .,

198

Bombay . . . . ..

1,21,188

t\

1965-66

Miss. P. Benjnmin, c/o M/s. Hughes, & Davia,

199

101, M . G. Road, Bombay-i

1,36,384

1963-64

It

P,A. Narialwala, Bombay House, Bruce St.,

2 00

1965-66

Fort, Bombay . . . ..

1|

1,31.470

P.B. Banaji, Navsari Chambers, Dr. D. N. Road,

aor

1965-66

ff

i,46"963 Bombay . . . . .. P.C.R. Coates, Burmah Shell Oil Stg. & Dis-

2 02

tribution Co., B . E, Bombay

1,36,665

>J

1964-65

P. D. Aswani, Dadi Mansion, Barrack Road,

2 03

Bombay

1061-62 1962-63 1963-64

I,7%047 3,51.437

1,02,820

2 04  P J.  Patcl,  i qj  Dr.  D . N.  Road,  Bombay.           j>         1962-63
205   P.  L. Tandon  c/o  M/s.  Hindustan  Lever.  L t d .,
        Hindustan  Lever  House,  Backbay      Recalama-
        tion,  Bombay-i.                                        ))

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,13,582

r, 2 7,467

1,23,942

1,07,620

Mrs. P .M. Gamble, c/o M / s. A & F. Harvey L t d .,

206

J>

3,63,467

1965-66

M^durai . . . . .. P. P. Mistry, c/o Ardeshir B. Cursetji Sc Sons P.

207

Ltd., 6 Rampart Row, Fort, Bombay-1

1965-66

1,17.21s

P. R. Irani, c/o New Roshan Talkies, Comer of

308

}i

Grant Road, Bombay . . ..

1962-63 1963-64

1.36,443 i,55,6rK

Smt. Pannoben H. Mafatlal, Mafat Lai House,

209

Fort, Bombay .

it

1965-66

1,04,614

Pheroze Kudinwnlla, Mackanian Mackenzie

2 10

j j

Building, Ballard Estate, Bombay-i

1,16^76

1962-63

Plcstella, Prop. Slid Champaklal, Kalidas

an

Sayani, 9S, Vithalwadi, Bombay .

1964-65

1965-66

2;54J74° 2,31,808

Popatlal Bhikhachand, 80-A/B Mahajan Associa-

2 12

1961-62

tion, Sk. Momon, St., Hombay .

1,04,944

„<

R. A. R. Patton, Burmah Shell Oil & StR. Co.,

213

Ltd., Bombay . . . ..

1965-66

I.45.OI?

214

1965-66

11

R. C. Khnnna, c/o A- F. Ferguson & Co., Bombay . . . . ..

1,16,705

R.G. Earnest, Esso Standard Eastern Inc. Bom-

a

bay

. . . . ..

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,25,737 1.25,946 1,35,856

R.J. Wendt, Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co.,

216

1965-66

Haybunder Rd., Bombay . . ..

1,19,988

a

R . L. Goldsack, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg. Dist.

217

>j

Co., B.E. Bombay

1963-63 1963-64 1964-65

1,35.591 .1.25,843 5,566

R . M. Burr, B.P. India Agencies L t d ., Graham

218

r>

Road, Bombay

1963-64 1964.65

1,01,128

1,10,635

3 19

1,06,884

1965-66

Indl.

2 20

1,18,898

1965-66

R . M. Gravin, Firestone T y re & Rubber Co., Haybunder Road, Bombay . .. R.R. More, Burmah Shell Oil & Stg. Co. Ltd., Bombay . . . . ..

2 31

ii

Raj Kapoor, Prop. M/§. R. K. Films, Trombay Road, Chamhur, Bombay 7 1. . . . ..

I

7,90,009

1962-63 1963-64

2 2* Miss Rajshree, "Grosvcnor" BeddarRoad, Bom-

1965-66

i=i7>744

71

bay-26

Rashesh N. Mafatlal, Mafatlal House, Fort,

aa3

4,56,852

1965-66

>3

Bombay

2 14 Smt. Reshmo Rfini Puri, c/o M/s Piare Lai Premnath, 180/82, Sk. Memon St. Bombay

M5 S,B. Aggarwal, 3 N ew Queens Road, Bombay .

1,06,486 t,24.S27 1,22,712

1962-63 7963-6^ 1964-65 1965-66

T.71.442

2 26 S.L.G. Wright, Blundell Eomite Paints Ltd.,

1,02,969

1961-62

Victoria Cross Lane, Bombay-10

1

2 *7 S.K. Kabbur, c/o M/s Kabbur Pvt. Ltd., 3, Bastion

1965-66

3.°9.-4*5

3)

Road, Bombay . . . ..

2 18 S.M. Dehanuker, Industrial Ass. Building, Fort,

1,21,591

3J

Bombay . . . . ..

2 29

,T

S.N. Aggarwal, 3 New Queens Road, Bombay .

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,24,527

1,22,713

ij7r>332

2 30 S.R.K. Vakil, c/o M/s Mulla & Mulln Cragie Blunt

& Caroe, 51, M.G. Rd., Bombay

i3a5.2O5

1,15,605

T, 11,120

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

2 31

1965-66

I3I7.-475

Dr. S.R. Lele, c/o Borosil Glass Works Ltd., Chotani Estate, Proctor Road, Grant Road, Bombay . . . . ..

S.S. Khambatta, c/o M / s. Mulla & Mulla Cragie

2 32

Blunt & Caroe, ;i M . G. Rood, Bombay

1,T l,0O8

I,II,9O0

1964-65 1965-66

233

S.V. Iyer, c/o M/s. Hughes & Davis, lor, M.G. Ror.d, Bombay . . . ..

1963-64

I32S,553

S. Moolgnonkar, Bombay House, Bruce Street,

234

Bombay

I,l6,966

1,

1965-66

Mrs. Sylla R, Holms, c/o M/s M.J. Divccha, 22,

235

Appolo St., Fort, Bombay .

I,I2,O53

5,

1965-66

S. Gothburg, Swedish Match Co., WiUct Road,

236

Bombay

1966-67

1^9,317

S m t. S h a k u n t la S. P a r e k h, c /o M /s N ew P a ck

237

I n d u s t r i e s, L o t us H o u s e, 3 3 - A, N ew M a r i ne L i n e s, B o m b n y -i . . . ..

1,86,280

1961-62

S h a n k ar S i n g h, B e a c o n, C h u r c h g a te R c d a m a t i o n,

238

O p p. S a c h i v a l a y a, B o m b ay . . ..

3>

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,89.245 I.54>*72 1,74,55=

239 S h r e c p a r u k a s h, A g a t w a l, K a m a ni H o u s e, P e d d ar

R o a d, B o m b ay . . . ..

1964-65 1965-66

i,i5,68<;

i,45.210

2 40 S m t. S h u s h i l a d e vi A g a r w a l, by legal r e p r e s e n t a- t i ve S h ri S. N. A g g a r w a l, K a m a ni H o u s e, P e d d ar R o a d, B o m b ay . . ..

1965-66

1,16,901

„

2 41 M r s. S h a r a d a b cn B h a g u b h ai M a f a t l a l, M a f a t l al

H o u s e, F o r t, B o m b ay . . ..

1965-66

3,02,297

• 33

24a S m t. S u s h i l a b en A r v i nd P r a s a d, M a f at L ai H o u s e, F o r t, B o m b ay . . ..

1,00,93 6

1965-66

3J

1961-62 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

2,85,255 3,35.ooo 1,85.000 I,l8,I3O

T. Chesbrough, Esso Standard Eastern Inc.,

244

Bombay . . , . "r . .

1965-66

1,22,732

V.K. Kodikal, Colgate Palmolive Ltd., SteelwafcT

245

House, Dinsliawacha Road, Bombay .

3)

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,95.820 1,68,618 I34 3 J 9 39 1,85,099

V.P. Sanghji, c/o M/s East African Traders, 75,

246

Ji

Khand Bazar, St. Bombay

1961-62

2,28,334

Lady Vera David, c/o M / s. A.F. Ferguson & Co.,

JJ

1965-66

Appolo St., Bombay . . ..

1.17^07

248

ij

1964-65

^14,338

249

1961-62

3i

Varajalal Chandulal Mehta, c/o M/s Mohtnlal Raichand & Sons, 78/83 Sk. Memon St., Bombay . . . . .. Vijaysingh H. Vcd, c/o M/s Vijay Studio, 1/3, Gola Lane, Fort, Bombay . . ..

1.09.575

2 50 W.M. Johmon, Nasmith Courts & Co., 8 1,

1962-63

93.5<5o Fountain Street, Manchester-2 .

Indian Income

1,14,860 T.W.I.

2 51

1,33,732

1964-65

25a

W.M. Lubsy, Esso Standard Eastern Incorpora- tion, Bombay . . . . .. W.S.G. Nelson, Cadbury Fry (I) Ltd., Bhu-

1962-63

1.10,373

labhai Desai Road, Bombay

1 Y.A. Fazalbhoy, c/o General Radio & Appliances

232

Ltd., Opera House, Bombay

1964-65 1965-66

1,72,747 1,44.276

2 5/

1965-66

t Yogindra N. Mafat Lai, Mafat Lai House, Fort, Bombay-l, . . . . ..

4.5<5;>79*

BOMBAY C I T Y - II

A-A. Fazalbhoy, 41 Liberty Blig., Marine Lines,

253

Bombay . . . . ..

Indl.

19S5-66

i-j ."j, J JJ

A.A. Rao, State Bank Building, Bank Street,

236

Bombay . . . . ..

T Q 7 .H CSl

1064-6'!

* 7y*t *^J

A.B. Billimoria, c/o M/s. Tata Sons (Pvt.) Ltd.,

257

Bruce Street, Bombay . . ..

JJ

iJ

1964-65 I963-64

1,51,710

1,00,451

A.G. Daftry, 25 P.B. St., Bombay. A.H. Rav;i, Prop. Habib Ravji & Co., Hamam

238 239

House, Hamam St., Bombay

?J

1962-63

1,07,437

A . T. Kataria, c/o T. H. Kutaria & Co., 323-25,

2 60

Abdul Rehman St., Bombay

3J

1965-66

r, 14,624

A.V. Birla, Industry House, Churchgate Bom-

2 61

bay

. . . . ..

J>

2,60,995

1964-65

Abdul Hussain Gulam Ali, 66-68 Narayan Dhru

2 62

Street, Bombay

JJ

Adi C.R. Wadia, 70 Forbes St., Bombay

263

1960-61 1961-62 1964-65 1965-66

}}

1961-62

3.33.148 1,97,010 1,19,780 I.I9.558 1,97, ioa 264 Arnar Chand S. Doshi, 6-A, Bruce St., Bombay . Anuradha K, Seth, Anand Bhavan, Babulnath,

3rd Crosa Lane, Bombay

1965-66

1.79.677

Miss Asha B. Makari^, 5"-A, Krishna Niwas,

266

ft

1963-64

2,35,277

267

JJ

Walkeshwar Rd., Bombay . . .. ' B.B. Nayar, 413-G, Vasantwadi, Knibadcvi Road, Bombay . . . . ..

1960-61

5.58,431

2 68 B.D. Bharucha, c/o M/s. Edward Talkies Rd.,

Bombay.

1961-62

IndL

1,59,102

13.G. Navlaki c/o M/s. J.V. Navlakhi & Co.,

269

533) Kalbadevi Road, Bombay. , . .

2 70

1963-64 1964-65

1,18,222 1,91,487 B.K. Mehta, 28, Appolo St., Bombay . B.V. Mehta, c/n M/s. Bombay Hardware Co.,

2 71

Iron Jetha, Carnac Bunder, Bombay .

1964-65

1,04,606

„

2 72 Ii.L. Mulchandanij Sukh Sagar, Hughes Road,

J,

Bombay . . . . ..

1963-64 1961-62

1,59,344 1,04,612

„

B.L. Shah, 112 Nagdevi St., Bombay . B.N. Widhtai, 41, Mchta House, Medows Street,

2 73 274

1,00,130

1961-62 1961-62

,,

Bombay . . . . .. B. N. Trivcdi, 19, Hamam Street, Bombay. B.R. Tannan, c/o M/s. Sharp & Taiwan, Appolo

275 276

Street, Bombay.

3t

1964-65 1965-66 1961-62

1.57,219 1,61,872 1.38,515 B. V. Patel, Gopal Gali, Bombay. . Babubhai M. Malkan, c/o M/s. Empire Trading,

277 278

J,

76, Tamarind Lane, Bombay.

1965-66

1.03,51°

Banoo F. Merita, Mehta House, 79-91 'Appolo

279

Street, Bombay.

,,

1965-66 1961-62

1,00,670

1.15.481

2 80 2 81

55

Banwarilal, 80-82, Nagdevi St., Bombay. . Bhagwandas Jethabhai (Deed), through legal heir Shri Nirmal Bhagwandas, c/o Bombay Surgical Co., 104, Charm Road, Bombay.

1962-63

i.3i>759

2 82 Bhagwandas N. Makhija, Madhavrai Galli,

M.J.C. Market, Bombay.

1964-65

I,08.07^i,v**,;7 / ^-

C.C. Choksey c/o C.C. Chokscy & Co. Mustafa '

283

,,

1965-66

Building, P. M, Road, Bombay. .

1,56,683

C. G. Sanya, Harji Mansion, Darbshah Road,

284

I,

SI

.,

1965-66 1964-65 196T-62

1,10,640

^41,173

1,11,784

Bombay. . . . . .. C. K. Shah, 16-18, A. P. St., Bombay. C. L. Shah, 112, Nagdevi St., Bombay. . C. M. Shah c/o M/s. Kanchand & Co., Sindhu

285 286 287

1963-64

House, Nanabhai Lane, Bombay. .

1,91,469

C. T. Parekh, Prop. C.T. Parekh & Co., 64, Ali

288

1961-62

,5

Chambers, Doab Lane, Bombay.

2,34.900

289

ii

C. W. Lloyd, c/o M/s. Fort RohodesParks & Co., Bank of Baroda Building, Appollo Street, Bombay. . . . , . .,

1964-65

1.33.405

2 90 Cavas) i Jehangir Part III, Ready Money Mansion,

i}

V. N. Road, Bombay.

1963-64

2,18,293

Bai Chanda Bhaidas, Glri KunJ, Huge's Road,

291

j,

1963-64

1,05,263

Bombay

Champaklal Devi Da"3 Agakhan Bldg., Dalai

291

,)

Street, Bombay.

1962-63

I,29,89>

Chandufal Mulchand, c/o M/s. N. Chandulal &

293

1965-66

i,

Co., 34 A.R. St., Bombay

1,18,051

CWmanlal Nathuram,DadarGalH,M.J. Market,

2 94

I

Bombay

2.36,141

SS

1961-62

Chimanlal Mohanlal, c/o M/s. N. Chiman, Lai &

295

}3

Co., 36. Princess Street, Bombay.

ii

296 Chlraan Lai B. Parekh, 28 Appollo St., Bombay.

1965-66 1962-63 1964-65

1.90,528 1,40,619 I.I6.374

D. A. Patel, Mangesh Building, New Bhatwadi,

297

1,

1963-64

Bombay

1,01,502

298 D. C, Master c/o M/s. Master Sathe & Kothari,

1964-65

34-38 Hamam Street, Bombay.

,1

1.18,157

D. D. Lakhanpal, Prop. Sharma Radio Corpora-

299

tion, 29 New Queens Road, Bombay.

31

3 00 D.R. Nayar, 413-G, Vaaantwadi Kalbadevi Road,

1963-64 1964-65 1960-61

1,87,810 1.64,848 5.67,307

HUF.

Bombay.

3 01 D. R. Mehta, Warden Road, Bombay.

Indl.

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

i.89,979 1,85,902 1,89.637

Indl.

1964-65

i>i9>533

D. R. S'iroaf, Grant Road, Bombay. D. V. Mshta, c/o M/3. Bombay Hardware Co.,

3 02 303

Iron Jctha, Carnac Bunder Bombay.

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

I.O7; 167

1,5^3-7

i.3333"5

O. V. Daruwalh, c/o M/s. Daruwalln Brother!" "

304

Pvt. Ltd., Shroff Mansion, Princess Street, Bombay-3.

3,76,38* 3,33,451

1964-65 1965-66

Damodardas Pannanand, Chandra Chowk, M J . C.

305

Mkt., Bombay.

1,00,639

1964-65

37

Darnodar Hansraj, 15 Union Bank Building,

3o"

Dalai St., Bombay.

I,O3,I3"

Jj

1961-62

Dhirendra Kantilai, Old St., Ex. Buil.ling, Dalai

307

Street, Bombay, . . . ..

1963-64

JJ

i>08,339

Diamond Art Photo Studio, Prop. Shri BabubhfU

303

Vallabhdas, 188, Kd. Rd., Bombay.

1,09,016

iJ [

1958-59

Dubash A. B. (Minor) Guardian B.A. Dubash, '

3 09

Rampart Row, Bombay. . . ..

it

3J

1964-65 1965-66 1965-66

1,19,957 I.55.6I9 1,03,956 3 10 3" 3 12

Pali S. Miriman, High Court, Bombay. Fasal Rchimatulla, Ridge Rd., Bombay. ' G. A. Thekkar, c/o M / s. Ambyahi Dewnnji, F o rt Chambers B. Blocks Dean Lane, H a m am Street, Bombay.

if

313

1965-66 1961-64 1965-66

1,59,733 I,42.9"O 1.84,191 314

G. M. Ag?arwal, 56. Sutar Chawal, Bombay. G. P. Kapadia, c/o M / s. G. P. Kapadia & Co., Hamam Street, Bombay . . ..

315 Ghanshamdas Hotchand (Deed.) by his legal heir Shri Naraindas Ghanshyam Das, 20 Shrua, 180, Marine Drive, Bombay.

1961-62

3,21,09?

Smt. Gopikumnr Birla, Birla House, Mount

3 16

Pleasant Road, Bo n b a y. .

3*49.434 3.37,719

1964-65 1965-66

Gulam Mohd. Haji Ali Mohd., 223, Chakla Street,

317

1965-66

Bombay. . . . . . ..

1.76,307

H. D. Jethamlani, Valcon Insurance Building,

318

V. N. Road, Bombay. . . ..

5J

1963-64 1964-65

1.11,714

1.12,034

1965-66

1,06,463

H. K. Bhuvani, Mchta House, Appolo Street Bombay „ H. N. Donhi, c/o Santilal Hakam Chand, 134,

319 3 30

Radhagalli, Sw. Mkt., Bombay. .

1964-65

J*

I,i9,97"

H. 0. Shah, c/o M ' s. B. B. Electric Auto Stores, '

3 31

98, Princess Street, Bombay.

J.J

1965-66 1965-66

1.18,764 4,50,000 Hamid Abdul Kadar, 94, Kambekar St., Bombay, Hiralal N. Shroff, Lcntin Chambers, Dalai Streetj

33a 333

1965-66

Bombay. . . . . . ..

1,33,653

Lady Hira Bai C. Jahangir, Ready Money Mansion,

3M

1962-63

Nepcan Sea Road, Bombay,

1 vt 1,336

Himetlal B. Mehta, c/o M / s. Sudhir Motorij

335

1,65,154

1965-66

Kennedy Bridge, Bombay. . . .. Smt. Hazarabai Abdull Rehman, Dharamraj

3*5

3,53,107

1964-65

Gaily, M J . C. Mkt., Bombay.

"1

Late I. B. Wilson (deed.) by his legal Repr. &

337

Administrator of Estate of Shri C.H. Pardow"U, c/o M / s. Crawford Boylay& Co., Bank Street, Bombay-1. . . ..

1963-64

1,04,087

M r s. Indumat Ravindra Mulraj, 9-A, Bhabul

328

Nath Road, Bombay.

1963-64 1965-60

>t

3,35>37* 1.98,404 339 330

J . B. Kanga, High Court, Bombay. J. C. Bhatt, Tamarind Lane, Fort Chambers, Bombay, . . . . . ..

,j

196J-66 1961-62

1,11,074

1,00,000

J. D, Kapadia, Bombay. . . .. L t. Col. J. D. Kothawalla (Deed.) Grosti Venor

331 333

House, Peddar Road, Bombay.

1965-66

i,4i,88"

J>

J. H. C-ma, 24-26, Dalai St., Bombay.

Indl.

333

1,05,820

1,21,976

1,01,906

1964-65 1965-66 1965-66

T. K. Seervai, Ban Nivas. Wf ' - Road, Bombay. J. M. Nfavar, 113-G, Vasai, ;,jbfl Devi

334 335

Roa 1, Bombay. , ' .

JJ

it

J. R. NTayar, as above. . . . ..

1960-61

1960-61

6,70,446 5"76,765 33

J. T. Ja^tiani, National House, Tulloch Road,

337

it

1,30)290

Bomhav . . . . ..

i9<53-64 1962-63 1965-66

2,01,259

8,00,000

338 339 340

J. V. Patel, 32-34, V-N- Road, Bombay J. D*in, i i, Mohammedali Rd. Bombay Jagmohanlaa Gokuldas c/o M/S Lallubhal Ami- chand Pvt. Ltd., 30 Kansara Chawal, Kd. Rd., Bombay

JV

a^i.75"

1964-S5

Jayantihi Dyaybhal c/o M /J Chiman Lai Piem-

341

charH Pr. St., Bombay

2.03,913

1965-66 1965-66

HUF

Indl.

1.63.59a Jaccob R. E. Sasrxm, 3, Faze Rd., Bombay Mri. Tino-i H. Tehan

3+" 343

1,11,241

5t

V.N. Rd., Bombay

1963-64

Jogilal Hanumanbux, c/o M/s Jehorimal Ramlal,

344

405, Kalbadcvi Rd., Bombay

1962-63

IV

143.634

K. C. Shah, c/o M/s Kanchand & Co., Sindhu

345

1,07,166

1963-64

House, Nanabhsi Lane, Bombay

ft

K. C. Nayar, 413-G, Vasantwadi, Kalbadevi Rd.,

346

196061

HUF

3.39.613 Bombay

K. C. Motla, c/o Roopkala, Queens Rd., Queen*

347

Indl.

Chambers, Bombay

1963-64

1,03,718

K. C. Motani, e/o M/S Bombay Hardware Co.,

343

Iron Jethfl, Carnac Bunder, Bombay

1,06,880 1,58,269 1,38,180

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

K. D. Nayar, 413-G, Vasantwadi, Kalbadcvi Rd.,

349

ft*

Bombay . ..

.

tt

1960-61 1965-66

6,66,168 1.42,179 K. H. Bhabha, New Cufe Parade, Bombay K. K. Mehta, c/o Prop, of Jupiter Mills Store,

350 351

1,22,923

1961-62

1>

Appolo St., Bombay

K. K. Mehta, c/o M/s Santilal C. Mchta, 71-73,

35a

1,04,791

"

Appollo St., Bombay

1963-64

K. L. Nayar, 413-G, Vasantwadi, Kalbadevi Road

333

Bombay

1960-61 1965-66

5.61.667 1,08,844

H.U.F. Indl.

K. M. Mistry, %j, Abdul Rchman St., Bombay,-3 K. N. Nazir, c/o M/s N. R. Nazir & Sons, 5,

354 355

Hamam St., Bombay - - .

m

141.741 1,46,002

1964-65 1965-66

K. P. Patel (Dr.), c/o P & B Laboratories, 11-C

356

j>

it

1964-65 1965-66 196.3-64

1,01,500 1,88,820 i3O5,i33

. .. "

Anil

357 358 359

1961-62

Ashok Road, Kandivf lli, Bombay-67 K. T. Divecha, 24-26 Dalai St., Bombay K. T. Dholakia, French Bridge, Bombay Smf. K. V. Bodai, c/o M/s Oriental Aromatici Trading Co. Shroff Mansion, 32, Princess Street, Bobmay

1.58,583

. H.U.F.

Kapitak Muljishah, Khetwadl Back Rd.,

3"o

IndL

1965-66

Bombay .

. ..

1.14.841

361

J*

H.H. Shah, Karim Aga Khan through his Attor- ney Shri Ismail Mohd. Jaflar, Asakhan Bldg., Dalai St., Bombay . . ..

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

3.52,834 3.52,834 3.53,834 3.52.834

Kasturchand Sarupchand c/o M/S Kastur Chand

362

1961-63

J"

&55.3I8 Sarupchind, Dalai Street, Bombay

\

Smt. Kailta K. Vasa, E-4 Mafatlal Park, Warden

363

Road, Bombay . . . ..

1963-64 1964-65

1,08,214 1,80,279

Trusted of Late Ktruoa Shakar, 64-60 Chakla

3"4

St., Bombay

Iadl.

L '

t>

Kantilal Lallubhai, 34, KagderlSt, Bombay] .

1965-66

I9<53-64

TQftA-fi*

I"76J3O7

1,22,297

TOT rtoi•••jjj-iuy*

356 M M. Kaahiben A. Patel, 91, Walkwhwar, Bom-

11

bay-6

M7i5i7

1963-64

367 Kwhub Mahindra, L/H of late Shri K, C. Mahl- ndra, c/o M/S Mahindra & Mahindia Ltd., Gateway Building Appolo Bunder, Bombay-i.

tt

i/)4"438

1/51^04

1960-61

1961-62

U

1.19,049

1961-63

Kirtilal Nanalal 29 Bibljan St., Bombay

Bai Koomlbai Phirog Shah, Amarchand Mansion,

368 369

Maya Rd., Bombay . ..

1963-64

W5>979

370 Smt. Kusumbai Motichand Shah, c/o Moti Chand Shah & Co., United India Bunding, Sir P.M. Road, Bombay . . ..

Lady Kutum H. Kanta, 30, Ridge Road, Bombay

"

371

1963-63

1964-65

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

I96J-66

1962-63

1,14,803

1^3.989

1^10,021

1,45,280

1,21,366

i>35'520

3,98,785

1962-63

HOT

Kudilal O. Safcwiia, 130, MedowB St., Bombay .

L. D. Nayar, 413-G, Vasantwadi, Bombay-2

L. V. Sathe, c/o M/s Master Sathe & Kothari,

372 373 374

34-38 Hamam St., Bombay

1964-65

1965-66

1,09,217

i"33>i99

IndL "l

M M. L. Y. Shah, N.D. Rd., Bombay

Lalbhal P. Patel, c/o B. P. & Co., 20 Sambhaya

375 37"

Chambert, Sir P.M. Rd., Bombay

"1 1962-63 1963-64

1^2,814

1,05,344

M. C. Patel, Psop. of M/8 Rajat Stn. Mart,

377

Khctwadi Ma Rd., Bombay

JJ

fj

1961-63

1965-66

1,14,000

5^5,729

M. C. Sctalvad, High Court, Bombay

M. G. Bhatt, c/o M/s Mora & Bhatt, 28, Appollo

378 379

2,04,723

1 " [

1963-64

St., Bombay

M. K. Bora, Round Bldg., Kalbadevl Rd., Bom-

380

bay ^

H

1963-64

1964-65

1.53^84

1^8,733

M. K. Tata, Sea, Side, Bhulabhai Deiai Road,

38i

JJ

Bombay

1,15,778

If

it

1963-64

1962-63

1964-65

IJ35,579

1,19.995

M. M. BJJaney, 140 Commerce House, Bombay

M. P. Laud, High Court, Bombay .

M n. M. P. Shah & Co., 174, Lamington Rd.,

382 383 984

ti

1964-65

Bombay .

1,31,748

385

"

M. P. Pobon c/o M/" Poison Ltd., 65-B, Dock-

yard Road, Bombay-10 . . ..

1965-66

I J 3 7 J 1 I3 M. R. Paripia, Lentin Chamberi, Dalai St., Bom-

386

bay

w

XI

1965-66

1963-66

1961-62

1,36,570

1,37,769

1,40,000

M. S. Kalbag, Lamington Rd., Bombay .

M. S. Krijhnan, 82-86 A. R. St., Bombay

Manilal Kallanji, S. V. Lane, M.J.C Mkt.,

387 388 389

*J

1,07,548

Bombay

1965-66

Mahadcv Singh! Induitry House, Church Gate,

390

H

I.77,58i

Bombay

•

1964-65

391 Mn. Manorama L. Apte, 67, Peddar Rd., Bom-

1^13,266

1965-66

bay

M. Mannal, Harghan Villa, Warden Road, Bom-

392

bay

"

1964-65

a^7ji79

Mohanlal Maganlal, Chandra Chowk, M.J.C

393

HUF

Mkt., Bombay

1962-63

iico,759

394

IndL

H.H. Nawab Mohammed Khan of Palanpur

"Wlndmwe" Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Bom-

bay

1964-65

I^7J637

Motilal Gangadas, Chandra Chowk, M.J. Mkt,

395

1964-65

Bombay

r,3i,988

1965-66

i 8,00,000

Indl.

Mohammed, 91, Mohammedali Rd,, Bombay

Mulchand Nandlal, Prop: of M/". Nana Lai &

$ 396 397

Co., 126, Radhagalli, Sw. Mkt., Bombay

1961-62

, 1,14.715

Muliibhai Chhaganlal, c/o M/" Kanti Lai 4 Co.,

398

Chandra Chovrk, M.J.C. Mkt., Bombay

HUF Indl.

399 4 00

91

N. A. Palkhiwala, High Court, Bombay

N. J. Giuvradi, 31-Nepean Sea Rd., Bombay

1961-62

1963-66

1962-63

1963-64

1,31,242

4,82,073

1,71,322

1,74.954

4 01 N. L. I. Mathias, c/o Neo Pharma Pvt. Ltd,,

it

Kasturi Bldg., J.T. Road, Bombay

1963-64

2,28,392

4 02 N. M. Seervai, Chamber No. 24, High Court, Bombay . . . . . ..

1965-66

is

1,54,240

403 N. N. Shroff, Sole Prop, of M/S Hlra Lai Shroff & Co., Lentln Chambers, Dakl Street, Bombay . . . . . ..

1!

1963-64

1964-65

1.34.372

1,30,94*

N. P. Samgani, Prop. The Empire Tdg. Co., Ali

404

Chambers, Tarmarind Lane, Bombay

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

1.89,333

2^9.^47

1,19.855

405 406

1964-65

1,78,902

407

N. P. Waddia, 7 0, Forbes St., B o m b ay N. S. Phatarpckar, State Bank B l d g ., Bank Street, B o m b ay . . . . .. N. T. Shah, c/o N. T. Shah flc C o ., Stock E x- change B u i l d i n g, B o m b ay . . ..

1962-63

1963-64

1965-66

S3

I.34.I84

1,20,042

ijOK.538

1,04,578

1964-65

N. V. Bhadke, 2 6 3, B. C h a m! R o a d, B o m b ay N. Dandekar, Express Bldg., nt. Floor, Church-

408 409

gate, Bombay . .

ff

1965-66

1,04,940

Narottam Keshavlal, c/o M/s. Savailal Maneklfll,

4 10

Narayan Chowk. M.J.C., Mkt., Bombay

1965-66

HUF

1,02,864

4 11 Naraindas Gordhandas, c/o M/s Narain Das

1961-62

IndL

Gordhandas, 180, Marine Drive, Bombay

1,17,806

Natwarlal Ncnchand, c/o M/s N. Bulaki Das

4 13

1961-62

Deokar Mansion, Vithaldas Rd., Bombay

1^83,354 Natvarlal Ochhavlal, 34, Nagdevi St., Bom-

413

bay

JJ

1963-64

1964-65

1,20,993

1,38,996

Natwar Lai O. Parikh, c/o M / B. R. Ochavlal &

414

Co., 86, Nagdevi Street, Bombay

1963-64

i,°7i5i3

Nihalchand Thawardas, c/o Nihalchand Lekhraj

415

1964-65

HUF

Chandra Chowk, M.J.C. Mkt., Bombay

1,02,885

Nihalchand Nathmal, Govlnd Chowk, M J.

416

1965-66

Market, Bombay . ..

Indl.

1,06,908

417

,,

O. J. Shah, Mody Chamber*, French Bridge, Bombay . . . . . .. ; P.C. Verma, Janmabhumi Chambers, Bombay-i

418

i>

• P.K. Casa, E-4, Mafatlal Park, Warden Road,

>J

4iS

JJ

42c 4 2]

H

Bombay . . . . . ..

) P.M. Mistry, 87, Abdul Rehman St., Bombay-3

[ P.S. Mistry, 70, Medows S t, Bombay

33

1963-64

1962-63

1964-65

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

1964-65

1965-66

1964-65

1,08,217

1.32,939

1,69,982

|i.33.O99

2,02,658

1,02,350

2,18,292

1,70,660

M 1,094

i P.T. Cama, 29-A, Deongersey Rd., Bombay .

1 Parmanand Pitamber, C/o M/s. General Book

4*3

Depot, 118 Princess St., Bombay

1965-66

]]

i.ai.359

4³4

HUF

1961-62

5,40,762

[ Pratap Dayaldas, Prop. M/a. M. Dial Das & Sons,

190 Pr. St., Bombay . . . ..

; Pramodchandra Motilal, Chandra Ch., M.J.C.

Indl.

1963-64

1,22,088

42<

( Popular Trading Co., Prop. Shri Ramniklal

Jadhavji, Navi Galli, M J. Mkt., Bombay

43; 43i 43<

J Porua A. Mchta3 High Court, Bombay

I Pratap Bhogi Lai, 7 Forbes St., Bombay .

) Prahladrai Brijlal, 156, Tardeo Rd., Bombay .

1965-66

1965-66

1960-61

1962-63

1.16,571

1,24^44

1.18,371

1.07.531

" " "" T

Puahpubai Kudilal, 1 3^ Medows Street,Bombay

430

Indl.

1962-63 1963-64

a>52,57^ 3>5L566

R.C. Santook, Mehta House, Appolo Street,

Bombay . . . ..

T.OA filfV

1965-66

R.G. N a y a r , 4 i3 GVaaantwadi, Kalbadevi Rogd,

432

Bombay . . . . . ..

5.53J98O

HUF Indl.

1960-61 1965-66

1,06,4 T9

433 AM

R.I.Shethna, 535, K.D.Road, Bombay R J, P a t d, C/o M/s. Vijaya Arts Ptg, Work", Gir?aun Rd., Bombay-4 . . ..

1963-64 1965-66

1,06,865 2,56,948 R J. Kolah, High Court, Bombay . R.M. Vadhelwala, Sole Prop. M/s. R. Vadhel-

435 436

walla & Co., 22 Appolo St., Bombay

>J

R.R. Gandhi, Petit Compound Rd., Bombay .

JJ

437

1964-65 1962-63 1963-64

1,38,390 I.2'J,§7* 1,25,748

R. S. Dcboo, Prop. Leach & Weberney, 3 4 Hamam

438

St., Bombay . . . . ..

i>

1961-fia 1964-65

4,98,252 1,61,645 439 440

j*

1964-65

2,01,962

-(41

R. Setlur, State Bank Buildins, Bombay Rameshchandra Gokuldaa C/o M/s. Laliubhai Amichand, Pvt. Ltd., 30, Kansara Chawal, Kd. Rd., Bombay . . . . .. Rashid A. Maskati, Maskati House, Moham- medali Road, Bombay . . ..

1964-65

n

1,84^493

Rameshchandra Ochhavlal, 86, Na'gdevi'Street,

442

it

Bombay

#

1963-64

i,o8^jo"

443 Rameshchandra Chhaganlal, Narayan D h ru Street, Bombay . . . . ..

iiOo.m

1964-65

ts

1963-64

1.21,347 RamanlalManilal,76,Nakhoda Street Bombay . Ramnath Daga, Seth Executor of the SethBadiidw

444 443

Dagu, 18/22, Sk. Mamon St. Bombay

9>

1963-63

5,87,7*4

Rohit Paper Mart. Prop. Vimalaben J. Patel,

44"

Messon Chembers, P.B. St., Bombay

yy

I(26^SO

1964-65

S.A. Sabawalla, Ready Money Mansion"V-N.

447

1964-63

1,14,07*

Road, Bombay . . . . .. S.C. Poddar, Stock Exchange Building, Dalai

44"

Street, Bombay . . ..

4J77,2O7

1961-62

                                                                ts
449   S.C.  Mehta,  C/o  Santilal  C.  Mohta  71-73,'Appolo
         St.,  Bombay          .    ,    ,    .    ,.           JJ         1962-63            ^37.939
      S.D.  Vimadalal,  Gooleatan,  New  Cuffe  Parade,                    1963-64            2,07,949
450
        Bombay           .    .    .     .    .    ..           J3

1961-63

1,00,054

451 S.D. Mehta, c/o M/a. Santilal C. Mehta, 71-73 Appolo St., Bombay . . ..

1^4,791

1963-64 1961-63

1J37.6O3

S.H. Btiagwati,48 Forbes St., Binjbay . S.H. Thakarsey C/o Sunderbai Hall N.T. Rd. of

452 453

it

Queens Rd, Bombay .

it

1965-66 1962-63 1965-66

2,86,290

1,01,301

1,49,122

454 455 456

S.J. Patel, 32-34, V.N. Rd. Bombay J S. J. Mehta, Lamington Road, Bombay . S. K. Toubro, C/o Larscn & Toubro Ltd., I.C. House, Dougal Rd.,Ballard Estate, Bombay .

1965-66

M61O67

457

1,16,079

JJ

1962-63

S. M. Mehta, Zaveri Mansion, Little Gips Roadj Bombay . . . . . .. S.N. Mu.lbidri,c/oM/s. Champ on AutoPartBB

458

Avantokabai, Gokhalc St., Bombay

1961-62

M 3 J O 7I

S. P. Mehta, Sheh Sadan, 114, Chr. Reckon.

459

Bombay .

3.20,545

1965-66

>j

S. T. Kataria, 323-25, Abdul Rehman Street,

^ 60

it

1965-66

1,14,79* Bombay . . . . . .. S. V. Gupta, 113-115 Mahatma Gandhi Road,

461

1}

1965-66

Bombay . . . . . ..

3ji9i55i

46a

JI

1964-65 1962-63

I,I9,IO"

1,02,035

S. W. Pcrceival c/o M/a. Ford Rhodea Parka &. Co. Bank of Baroda Building, Appolo Street, Bombay . . . . . .. Sant Singh Kohli, 363 S.V.P. Rd., Bombay

463 i

Sftntlnl Kfsonlalta c/o M/s, JohariMal Ramlal,

464

405 Kaibadevi Rd.j Bombay

Indl.

1962-63

ti.37,647

Santilal Hakanchand, 124, Radha Galll, Sw. Mkt.,

4"5

Bombay . . .. ,

it

1,16,024 2,25,264

1964-63 1965-66

Santram Murlirnal c/o M/s. Rameah Chandra

466

Santram & Co., Arpyle Rj., Bombay

1,00,330

1964-65

Santilal C. Dalai, Prop. Hindustan Textiles Stores,

4"7

47, 2nd Panjropola Lane, Bombay

"

2,92,486

1961-62

Saved Noohu Alia Abdul Qadir, Topfwala

468

it

Minsion, M.A. Rd., Bombay

4,00,00©

1965-66

Shersingh BhandaH, Sambhava Chambers, Sir

4"9

P.M. Rd., Bombay

11

1964-65 1965-66

I,9R,^IO 1,79=093

Smt. Shardadevl Birla, Birla House, Mount Plea-

47O

sant Road, Bombay ,

3i

2,77,096 2,40,603

1964-65 1965-66

Mrs, Seerinbai S. J. Dastur, Little Gibs Road,

471

Bombay . . . . . ..

JJ

1,12,187 I , 5 3 J 6 I7

1962-63 1962-63

ShivprasadJ.Vaid, 139, Melows Street, Bombay LadySitaDsviGaikwad, Nepoan Sea Rd., Bom-

472 473

Ji

bay

1964-63 1965-66

1,31.607 l,33>647

B ai S o n l b tl S u n d n r l al c /o M / s. N. S u n d e r i a lA

474

C o. P r i n c e ss S t. B o m b ay . . ..

31

1,00,356 1,02,085

1965-66 1964-65

" .!

Soli J" SorBbiee>2o Nepean Sea Road, Bombay Subodhbhai C. Shah, C/o M/s. C.P. Shah, 147,

475 476

Radhagalli, Sw. Mkt. Bombay

1965-66

1,03,2*7

Surendra Vadilal, Dadar Galli, MJ. Market,

477

it

Bombay

I.T4.92O 1,03,433

Suleman Ka"sftm Mitha, 27 Kolta St. Bombay .

1961-63 1962-63 1965-66

>1

478

1,17,641

T- H. KaUria, 323-25, Abdul Rehman Street,

479

1965-66

1,09,340 Bombay . . . . . .. T. J. Lalwani, Prop: East & West Trading Co.,

480

Advani Chambers, P.M. Road, Bombay

Jj

1965-66

7.24,269

Uttamchand M-Shah,4i6, Samti Sadan Bhandaji

481

Road, Matunga, Bombay-19

s>

JJ

1961-62 1965-66

2,75.2^3 1,07,731 V. T. Va>;e, Magaldas Rd., Bombay V. N. Shridkar,E-4JMafatlalPark,WardenRoad,

482 483

5*

Bombay . . , . . .,

Ji

V. R. Gandhi, Pettit Compound Rd., Bombay .

4*4

1,37,829 I,27,8lD 1,26,220

1965-66 1962-63 1963-64

485 VinodraiManilal Seth, C/oM/s. Vlnodrai Manilal & Co., S.V. Lane, MJ.C- Market, Bombay

>J

Maharani VijayaRaje, Scindiaof GwaliorSamudra

486

it

Mahal, Worli Bombay ,

1,34^765 3=33-357 5.66,155

1965-66 1962-63 1964-65

Y. B. Rage, Yashoda Co-operative Housing So-

4"7

>J

ciety, Sitaldevi Temple Road, (East) Mahim, Bombay . . . . . ..

Y.N. Shah, c/oN.T. Shah & Co.,Stock Exchange

488

n

Building, Dalai St., Bombay

1964-63 1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1965-66

1,02,301 1 1,08,740 (1,70,41* ' I,5I"79I 1,05,03a

BOMBAY CITY—III

489

1961-61

1,35,333

*tt

A. H. G a n d h i, Swastik C h a m b e r s, Carnac R o a d, B o m b ay . . . . . .. Anjaliben Pratap, c/o Golden Tobacco Co. P.

490

it

Ltd., G.B. Road, Vile-Parle . ..

1965-66

1JO4=58*

491

Ardeshir M, Mehta, Prop, of Mfs. Itore General Trading Co. 4I64, Duncan Road, Bombay

1961-6*

ft

1,04,00

492

1,18,196

Indl.

1964-65

B. Narayanaswamy, Bhyamla Plot No. 46, Don Boscko High School, Matunga, Bombay-19. B. N- Parikh, C/o M/s. N. M. Parikh & Co. Rafi

493

Ahmed Kidvai Road, Bombay-3i

1963-6,4

i>i9*O94

494

B. R. Shroff, C/o M/s. Darwain & Co., Palton Road, Bombay . . . . ..

1,04,960

1965-66

B. S. Dharia, Prop. Vilcan Mechanical Works, 209,

495

it

Sonawala compound, Tardeo, Bombay ,

2,24.345

H.U.F.

¹,⁹⁸.⁷⁰⁹r47,no Bhawanldas Binani, 28-30, Anantwadl BliawanJdas Binani, 28-30 Anantwadi, Bombay ,

496 497

1961-62 1965-66 1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 1964-65 1965-66

1,89,921 I.35.94I M9>347 1,11,323

Bishambardas Kapur, C/o M/s. Jankidas & Co.

498

Indl.

Mody St., Bombay . . . ..

1965-66

1,48,883

Biahandaa Kapur, C/o M/s. Jankidas & Co., Mody

499

St., Bombay . . . . ..

1965-66

4,51,944

Chatrabhuj Narsey, C/o Golden Tobacco Co., P.

5 00

1960-61

I.U.F.

Ltd., G.B. Road, Vile-Parle . . . I

*:.33:.7°I

501

Indl.

1963-64

7,96,207

5 02

D. H. Sohal,Prop. M/s. Sohal Eng. Works, T.P. Road, Off Hainc Road, Mahalaxmi, Bombay Miss Diana G, Wadia, C/o Neville House, Ballard

1965-66

1^7,116

Estate, Bombay

503

1,54,108

1965-66

Dilip D, Khatau, Laxmi BIdg., Ballard Estate, Bombay . . . . . .. Dharamscy Narscy, C/o M/s. Golden Tobacco

504

Co. P. Ltd., G.B. Road, Vile-Parle

1961-62

1962-63

M4.56* 1,63,784

Dwarkadas Meghji, 71, Govt. Gate Road, Bom-

505

bay-12

"

1962-63 1963-64 1965-66

M9.75* 1,90^63 i.79>5io Mrs. E. G. P. Shah, 99-C, Tardeo Road, Bombay Firos N. Dossa, Prop, of M/s. Sultan Dossa, 454,

506 507

Duncan Road, Bombay . . ..

"

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

2,00,000

2,00,000

2,00,000

G. B. Desai, Kushuwar BIdg., Shivaji Park,

508

1961-62

Bombay

i3oo,977

G. H. Dikshit, Lcsel, G.B. Rd., Santa Crua,

309

u

Bombay

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

3.05,85* 1.77.947 1,02,990

G. J. Varis, C/o M/s. G. J. Waria & Co., 48, G.T.

510

Road, Bombay

2,72,789 4,i2,6So

"

1961-62 1962-63

5" 5 12

Gokuldas Haridas, 66, Karwar St., Bombay Gulamally Abdul Hussein, C/o M/". Western India

"

Sales Agencies, Rcay Road, Bombay

1963-64 1964-65

1,09,266

1,03,718

H. P. Mody & Co., Prop. K. P. Mody, 177, Nagdea

513

I H UF

1961-62

3,71,000

St., Bombay .

.

Mrs. H. T. Bhojwan], 99-C. Tardeo Road, Bom-

514

IndL

1965-66

1,11^04

bay . . . . . ..

Haridas Damodar, C/o M/s. Damodar Anandji, 66,

515

Karwar Street, Bombay

>•

Haroon Ebrahim, C/o M/s. Abdul Sakoor Omar

516

Sahigara & Co., 45, Janjikar St., Bombay

1962-63 1964-65 1965-66

3,82,196 1,84,712 1,66,069

"

Hassankhan Mohammad Khan, C/o V. D. Darihar

517

1961-62

& Co., Dharavi, Bombay . . ..

}•

1.20,977

Irshad Ahmed Khan. C/o V.D. Datihar & Co.,

5 i8

1961-62

u

Dharavi, Bombay . . ..

I.46JO35

Jagdish Kapur, C/o M/s. Jankldas & Co., Mody

519

1965-66

2,40,074

tt

St., Bombay

Junnadas Hakumal, C/o M/s. H. Dayaram, 625,

3 20

It

Girguam RoBd, Bombay-2 . . ..

1,37,250 1,96,063

1962-63 1963-64

52 T

Sir Jamshedji Jijibhoy, Seth Minor, Peddcr Road,

Bombay .

Indl.

1,68,648

1964-65

5 22 Jayaing R. Madhani Ramgali Corner, G.B. Road,

Kandivali

1960-61

1,16,454

Smt. Jhanaibai Essardas, Prop. M/a. Essardas &

523

Sons, 54, Bomaji Master Road, Bombay

Indl.

1961-62

3,10,000

K. C. Amin, C/o Western India Avt^itho Works,

Love Lane, Mazagaon, Bombay-10

it

1,00,197

1964-65

K. C. Shah, Prop, of Universal Agencies, 16-18,

Chimpagalli, Bombay . . ..

JJ

1961-62

2,25,000

Kalyanji Anandji, C/o M/s. Kanji Kalyanji & Co.

526

)j

Station Road, Kandivall . . ..

1965-66

1,13,085

527

ij

1965-66

1,05,483 Mrs. Kcsharben Chatrabhuj C/o M/s. Golden Tobacoo Co. P. Ltd., G.B. Road, Vilc-Parle Kishnagopal Maheshwari, Rajmal, Bhulcshar,

518

Bombay

1964-65

HUF

M5"i3"

Kishan Chand I Budharni, Prop. M/a. Balaram &

529

Co., 54, Bomaji Master Road, Bombay .

1961-62

Indl.

M3>895

Kulvantrai, C/o M/s. Vishwa Sahyog, 37, Sarang

530

St., Bombay-3

1961-62

2,36,085

"

L. Satpal, C/o Popular Metal Works, Behind Fish

53i

Market Sion, Bombay-22

1963-64

1,09,153

Smt. Laxmi N. Merchant, Damodar Bhawan,

532

3>

Mahalaxmi Temple Compound, Bombay

1957-5S

i>33,877

M. A. Pandit, Benbuti Nlvas, Lady Hardinge

533

Road, Bombay . ..

1964-65

1,25,329

534 M. D. Bahadurji, C/o M/s. Mazda Trading Syndicate, Bhorwada House, Cumballft Hill Bombay

1962-63

1,06,219

M. S. Barodawalla, C/o Zenith Tin Works, Clerk

535

Road, Bombay . .. .

1960-61

2,09,586

M. S. Vernekar, C/o R. B. Munshi &Co., Mahavir

536

Bldg., Dr. Bhardash Road, Bombay-10 „

1,69,126

1965-66

M. V. Daraswamy, C/o V. D. Datihar & Co

537

Dharavi, Bombay

1961-62

1,15,177

Maganlal Chaganlal, 16, King Edward Road,

53S

Bombay-15

Indl.

1963-64 1964-65 1961-62

1,16,784 1,14,430 3,18,204 Mangaldas H. Bhuta, 23, Ovalwadi, Bombay Mathuradaa Haridas, C/o M/s. Damodar Anandji,

539 540

66, Karwar St., Bombay . . ..

JJ

Mohdj Yunus, C/o M/s. Abdul Sakoor Umar

1962-63 1964-65

541

3,97^978 ii37>499

Sahicara & Co., 45, Janjikar St., Bombay

3J

1965-66

1,23,023

N. M. Parikh, C/o M/s. N. M.:Parikh &. Co. Rafi

543

Ahmed Kidvai Road, Bombay-31

it

1963-64 1964-65

1,65,464 I)O9J974

Ncnmal Poonjaji Shah, 244, Bapty Road,

543

Bombay

>y

1963-64

1,08450

Master Nusll N. Wadia, Neville House, Bsllard

544

Estate, Bombay

1965-66

a

1,14,576

P. L. Dahanukar, 58, Shivaji Park, Dadar, Bom-

545

j>

bay

n

1961-62 1963-64

2,16,29a

1,51,831

P. P. Khambatta, 10, Club Road, Bombay Pinhas Anaram, C/o Himalaya House, Palton

546 547

Road, Bombay

a

JJ

1961-62 1963-64

1.80470 1,84429 Poonjaji Genaji, 244, Bapty Road, Bombay Pratap Narsey C/o M/s. Golden Tobacoo Co. P.

548 549

JJ

Ltd., G.B. Road, Vile-Parle

1961-62

1)59,789

55°

1963-64

1,00,127

     R. D. Bahadurji, C/o M/s. Mazda Trading Syndi-
        cate Bhorwada House, Cumballa Hill  Bombay
55i  R.  R.  D.  Kora,  C/o  M/s.  G.  J.  Waria & Co., 48,
        G.T. Road, Bombay                                  JJ        1961-62         1,54,260
552  R.  H. Lakhani, 97, Moreknd Road, Bombay              s>        1961-62         2,21,873
533   R. N.  Contractor,  125, Cumballa  Hill,  Bombay               1965-66

Ratilal Chaganlal, C/o Hiralal Chhaganlal, 9

$55

1961-62

1961-63

196T-62

1965-66

8,89272

1,15,6*8

1,38,5*3

3i58.O"5

Stock Exchange Blag., Bombay . . „ S. G. Nathu, 214, Cadcll Road, Bombay , . „ S. M. Jassawalla, 50, G.T. Road, Bombay . „ S. M. Mistry, 84, Sion Road, Bombay . *> „ S. S. Barodawalla, C/o Zenith Tin Works, Clerk

556 557 558 559

2,08,685

Road, Bombay . . .. „

1960-61

Smt. Shantaben D. Degal, 68-E, Nepean Sea Road,

56O

Bombay . .

• „

1963-64

. I,I6,7*4

Shantikumar N. Morarjl, Scindia House, Ballaid

J6i

Estate, Bombay .

. „

1,42,05a

1965-66

Sikandarlal, C/o Popular Metal Works, Behind

56>

Fish Market, Sion, Bombay-22 „

1,10,947

1963-64

Smt, Sumatl S. Morarji, Scindia House, Ballard

563

Estate Bombay

„

1965-66

M2.35° Taherbhoy Abdul Hussein, C/o M/s. Western

564

India Sales Agencies, Reay Road, Atlas Mill Compound, Bombay . . . .. „

1963-64

1964-65

1,10,752 i,54>775

V. S. Pawir, C/o M/a. Overseas Mfg. Co. India

565

House, Fort St., Bombay , . „

1963-64

1,07,080

Vallavhji Jadhavji, Jodhovji Mansion, Bhimani St.,

566

Matunga, Bombay-19

. „

2,30,403

1963-64

Vidyadhar Voman Chitaley, C/o All India Repor-

567

1,28,836

ters, Bombay . . . . . . „'

1965-66

Walter L, Racek, Shrecjl Bhavan, Lohar St.,

568

Bombay

. Indl.

1965-66

1.75.37* Zakarfa Ahmed, C/o M/a. Abdul Sakoor Umar

569

1964-65

19^-63

Sahigara & Co. 45, Janjikar St., Bombay . „ Bai Zayiribai Miihavji, Bombay „

570

1963-64

2,18,318

1,26,855

1,68,908

BOMBAY (CENTRAL)

Aggarwal Devkumar G. Gupta Mills Estate Reay

571

Road, Bombay . . . .. Indl.

1965-66

M7,334 Aggarwal Harikishandas T. Gupta Mill* Estate

J72

Reay Road, Bombay . . .. „

1,05,343

1,01,851

1964-65

1963-64

1965-66

1965-66

1,40,991

M4.317

Aggarwal Kewalkishan H. Do. . „ Aggarwal S.G. Gupta Mills Estatr Do. . „ Aggarwal Yogikishan H. Gupta Mills Estate Do „ Asher Anandji Liladhar, Hari Nivas Block No.

573 574 575 576

A-I, Forject Street, Bombay „ Asher Shivji Liladhar, 334, Samuel St., Bombay „

577

1959-60

1962-63

1963-64

3J² I>435 9.i",396 7.S5--343

1965-66

47,37,316 Balaram Toluram, Tumsar . . 1 H.U.F. Chiranjilal Shrila Goenka 16, Walkeshwar Road,

57" 579

1961-62

Bombay-6.

Indl.

20,06,484

580 Dabrai Rajcndra Kumar P4rasram3 2O5a Wadal*

1961-63

1,82,010

Road, Bombay . . . .. „

581 Dhirajlal Haridas C/o. S.S. Bharuoh CAB., C/O B.A. Patcl & Co., Examiner Press Building, Mcdows Street, Bombay

„

1962-63

E.C. Edulji, Nagpur

"l

1963-64

1,06,980

2,85,783

58a

Gandhi G.J-, Mangal Mansion, Vasanji Lalji Street,

583

1955-56

2,12,422

Khandivlee (West), Bombay „

Gupta Amirchand T. Gupta Mills Estate,

584

Road, Bombay-10

„

1,57,323

1,88,716

1,09,082

1960-61

1962-63

1963-64

Jyotindra Z. Mehta, Roxy Chambers, New

5B5

Indl. I9"4-"5 1961-63

2,36,874 1,88,500 Queen's Road, Bombay-4 . . .. K. K. Mishra, Nacpur . . .. Smt. Kamlabai K. Mehta, Roxy Chambers, New

586 5"7

1,10,037

Queens, Road, Bombav-4 • "

1964-65

5"8 M. J. Bijalani, C/o M/s. Blaze Advertising Pvt. Ltd., Central Bank Bldg., M . G. Road, Bom- bay . .. r _^

n

2.I9.43* I.IO,9ST

1961-63 1959-60

H

M a n s c t a K . K ., 165, Lohar Chawl, Bombay . Misra R.A.P., C/o Indian Furnace Co. Ltd., 12-A

589 590

Dr. Annie Besom Road, Bombay-18

M$

>t

1962-63 1964-65

1,08,710 1,01,928 59¹ 592

i,63,OJS

ndl.

1963-64

N . B. Manseta, 165, Lohar Chawal, Bombay . Maseem Gore, Great Social Bldg., Sir P. M. Road, Bombay . . .. .1 Late Sh. Patel N . P. by his L /H Kftmlaben N.

593

1961-63

Patel,

303.739

Pittic R.B. Haryanlal Bansilal, 207, Kalbadevi

594

1961-62

Road, Bombay H :.U.F.

4>™*445

595

1962-63

[ndl.

8,44,990 Ral Charanjit, C/o Indo Kem P. Ltd., Port, House, 221, D.N. Road, Bombay . .. 1

Smt. Rii, Usha, C/o Fashion Prints P. L t d .,

596

221, D, N, Road, Bombay

u

1962-63 1963-64

1,0 ,nj 1,68,029

Ratan Lai R. Morarka, 24-B, Carmichael Road,

597

1958-59

Bombay

• „

I.I3.57O

Ratnasey Bhagwandas, C/o, Bhaidas Carsondas,

598

1962-63

& Co. 16, Appollo St., Bombay

i,25i37T

H

Rupani Hemamal Alimchand, 10-12, Jarnbulwadi,

599

2,22,316

1964-65

f,

Bombay . .

6 00 Rupani Hemandas Alimcband, 10-12, Jambulwadi,

B o m b ay . . ..

1964-65 1964-65

2,25,531

3,10,817

„ "

601 6 02

1961-62

3;°3,739 L.H. Rupani Topandas Akumchand Do. Mrs. Ruia Kantabai M. C/o M/s. Ramnarayan Sons, P. Ltd., State Bank Bldg., Bank Street, Bombay

603

1961-62

1>

Miss Nariava, F.M., C/o. Blaze Advertising Pvt. Ltd., Central Bank Bldg., M . G. Rd., Bom- . .. bay

3,39,5"

DELHI

A.N. Ahuja Pro. Ahuja Radios, Chandni Chowk

604

ii

Delhi

605 A. V. Vishwana'h Shastri through C. V- Ratnam Nizumudln, Delhi.

1962-63 1962-63 1961-64 1964-65 1965-66

1.68,597 3,33,482 4,oi.534 3>53,426 3.93.52

606

607

B. N. Gupta c/o Bharat Kala Kendra (P) L'd, Conaugh' Place, New Delhi. Bfilwant Ral c/o Ram Krishau Kulwant Ral Golf Link, New Delhi.

1963-64 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 196S-66 1965-66

i,O9.7i7 1,53,070 1,21,182 1,30,649 I.I7.4M i,33,O73 D.B. Vlg. P/o Vig Bros. Chandni Chowk, Delhi D R. Sondhi C/o M/s. Auto Lamps (P) Ltd.,

60S 609

K. Gate, Delhi

1965-66

$3

M5.*"7

610

1961-62

Late Shri Daulat Ram Nirula, through Legal heir Shri Tek Chand Narula, Queen* Road, Delhi

J,

M5,63*

Deoki Nandan Gupta P/o M/s. Universal Radio

611

Chandni Chowk, Delhi . . ..

G.B. Pal, 13-Nizamuddin, New Delhi

613

M

1,10,000 I . 3 9 P" i.54.7&>

1963-64 1962-63 1963-64

G.S. Pathak, 7/39 SardarPatel Marg,

New Delhi

"

1965-66 1961-62

2,04,367 1,18,375 Ganesh Dasa, Under Hill Lane, Delhi . Hanuman Prasad Gupta Connaught Place New

614 " I5

1962-63

JJ

i3n,83 Delhi

1962-63

1963-64

2,5

2,05,436

I. K. Ghai, P/o P u re Ico Cream Co. Regal

617

Building, New Delhi . . ..

3 J

1961-62

2,19.753

618 Iqbal Singh P/o M / B. Auto Supply Co. Chandni Chowk, Delhi . . . -.- ,

Ji

1962-63

1,18,176

6 19  J.D.  Shourie,  P/o  M / B. Shourie  Bros,  N.  Gfirh,
        New  Delhi                                              19                            1,10,234
6 20  Jai  Gopal  Sethi  136,  Hotel  Imperial                  IS                           i"O9"339
                                                                                             1,41 701

1963-64

1961-62

1965-66

6 21 Jagjit Singh P/o M/s. Auto Supply Co. Chandni

}]

Chowk, Delhi

1,18,176

1962-63

" 22 Jaswant Rai C/o R am Kishan Kulwant Raj, Golf

Link, New Delhi . . ..

JJ

1,28,833 1,31,250 I,I8^74

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

I>3 8,373

K . G. Vig P/o Via BroB. Chandni Chowk, Delhi Indl. Kulwant Rai C/o Ram Kishan Kulwant Rai,

623 624

Golf Link, N ew Delhi . . ..

J>

1,60,934 1.37.039 1,38,916 1,26,039

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1965-66

62S Leoberadorfer Maschinen Favric A G. Desh

Bandhu Gupta Road New Delhi

1965-66

1,83,026

Maya Rani Punj, C/o Punj Sons, Connaught

626

Place, New Delhi

1,02,959

1963-64

Late Shri Munshi Lai, th. legal heirs C/o Munshi

627

Lai & Sons, Chawri Bszar, Delhi

"

1962-63

1963-64

1,37,280 1.49,355

628 P . L. Lamba, P/o Pure Ice Cream Co. Regal

Ji

Building, New Delhi . . ..

1961-62

2.19,753

Prem Chand Dewan P/o Krishan Roller Flour

629

Mills, Najafgarh Road, N. Delhi

1961-62

1,06,100

JJ

R.N. Haksar Prop. Pandit Bros. Chandni Chowk,

630

Delhi

33

t*

1963-64 1961-62 1961-62

1,38,874 r>75.°83 1,04,467 R. Gautam, 108 Gautam Nagar, N ew Delhi Smt, Ram Dulari, 26-Rohtak Road, Delhi S.P. Pun) C/o Punj Sons, Connaught Place, New

631 632 633

H

Delhi

"

1962-63 1961-62

1,10,750 4.95.H7 Sudershan Steel Rolling Mills, G . T. Road, Delhi Smt. Sushila Devi, 12, Alipur Road, N ew

"34 "35

u c im . . . . ..

1962-63

1964-65

n

IJ57>²4¹ 1,09,726 636 "37

Tllk Kumar Master 32, Curzon Road, New Delhi V.P. Puri C/o M/". Band Box (P) Ltd., Connaught

"

Place, New Delhi

1965-66

M7.33O

DELHI CENTRAL

Abdul Hamid Dalmia, 4, Scindia House, New

638

Indl.

1965-66

1,00,669 Delhi

Avtar Singh Sawhjiey, 3/5. Asaf Ali Road, New

639

1961-62

1,12,696 Delhi . . .. .

640 Banarsi Dasi Gupta (Seth) C/o Jaswant Sugar

1965-66

if

1,02,301

Mills Ltd., Meerut

641

19SJ-65

1,86,263

S. Charanjit Siir;h C/o Oriental Bldg. and Fur- nishing Co. (P) Ltd., Connaught Circus New Delhi

642 Dtiaram Paul Seth C/ct. Shiv Prakash Janak Raj

& Co., Amritiir

1962-63

6,19,881

1,29,059

H.U.F.

Gajanand Sutwah Goaeral Ganj, Kaapur Harish Chandra Golcha, M

643 644

1961-62

yan Ka Rasta, Jaipur . . ..

Hot Ram Aggarwal, Amritsar

645

1963-64

1.35.19°

1,04,477

Indl.

C46 Inder Sini;h C/o The Singh Engg. Works, (P)

Ltd., G.T. Road, Kanpur

Indl. 1965-66 1961-62

1,04,065

1,25,876

647 643

Jai Gopal Mshra, Amritaar Janak Raj Seth C/o ShivPrakash Jairfk Ra) & Co.,

Amritsar . . . . ..

1961-62

6,05,39a

Jawahar Lai Jain, C/o M/s. N&nhoomal Jyoti

649

Praaad, Halscy Road, Kanpur . , . !

1961-62

H.U.F.

1,68,315

1965-66

Indl.

33

1958-59

1961-62

1,00,699 1,64,154 1,18,218 Jai Hari Dalmia, 4, Scindia House, Delhi Smt. Ji^na Bai, T4B, Shiv Marg, Jaipur Jugal Klshore Mehra, Amritsar K.G. Khoala, i-Eteshbapdhu Gupta Road, New

6 51 6 52 "53

1?

Delhi . . . .

1062-63 1963-64 1961-62 1961-62 1960-61

i,oo,6Ji 1,19.437 6,15,561 i>03,745 3*07,437

H.U.F. IndL • "

Pt. Lila Ram, Masjid Moth, New DelhJ M.L. Barjatya, G-Schemo, Jaipur .t _, Smt. Maqsoda Begum, Srlnacar Mirdu Hari Dalmia 4, Scindia House, New

654 "55 656 <57

1965-66

Delhi

1,14,843

S. Mohan Singh C/o Oriental Bldg. and FurnfektD

"58

33

Co. (P) Ltd., Connaught Circus, New Delhi

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

4^7,095 6,38,687 5}38,29I

Moti Lai Jain C/o M/s. Nanhoomal Jyo.ti Pra,-

•59

sad, Halsey Road, Kanpur

H.U.F. Indl.

1961-62 1965-66

I.39.3I6

1,04,067

6 60 661

Nar Hari Dalmia, 4, Scindia Houae5 New Delhi Narain Das Jain C/o M/s. Nanhoonial Jyotl Prfl-

sad, Halscy Road, Kanpur . . , ]

1961-62

1961-62

                                                      H.U.F.                         1,54,6 it
662  R.  N.  Aginval,  165, Jor  Bagh}  N.  Delhi      Indl                          10,42,127
663  Raghu  Hari  Dalmia,  4,  Scindia  House,   New

1,00,693

1965-66

Delhi

664

1961-62

6,73,153 Raj Kumar Seth C/o Shiv ParkashJanafcRajflc Co., Amritsar • . • . . Ramesh Seth C/o Shiv Parkash Janak Raj & Co.,

"65

1961-62

JJ

Amritsar

. . . ..

5>92>779

*66 Shiv Prakash Seth C/o Shiv Parkash Janak Raj

1961-62

33

& Co., Amritsar

6,01,314

M3

S. Surinder Singh Kairon, Amritsar

"67

1959-60 1964-65 1962-63

1,91*413

8,88,133

i,O2,88j

V. D. Puri, 38, Pusa Road, N. Delhi . Vishnu Hari Dalmia, 4, Scindia House, New

668 "69

1965-66

1,48,330

it

Delhi

Vijuy Kumar KoWi, 6, Connaught Place, New

*7o

JJ

Delhi

J3

1961-62

1961-62

7*45*74J 19,52,681 W. L. Kohli, 6, Connaught Place, New Delhi . YadhuHari Djilmiaj 4, Scindia House, New

471 " 72

1965-66

JJ

1,00,66a

Delhi

GUJARAT—I

1965-66

Ind.

1.25*525

A s h r af S h a k o o r, D h o r a ji . . .. B h a g w a n l ul T. K h a r a w a l a, A s t o d ia R o a d,

673 "74

1963-64

ij°3.598

A h m c d a b ad . . . . . .. B h u p e n d ra K e s h a v l a l, 6 2 4, P e p a r d i nl P o l e, R e l i ef

"75

1965-66

1,03,908

R o a d, A h m e d a b ad . . . ..

C.A. Doshi, Dig. Nlvas, Near Power Hoxwe,

<76

1965-66

Jamnagar

. . . ..

1,19.211

Champaklal Nagindas C/o M/s. Nagindft* Dokt-

677

ram, Maskati Market, Ahmedabad

**

1*35.035 1,00^81

1962-63 1963-64

Chandulal Koshavkl C/o M/i. Pitamber Anan^l,

"78

1965-66

1,78,038

H.U.F.

Sihor

Chimanlal Bhikhabhai C/o M/s. American Oil &

679

Indl.

Trading Co., Revdi Bazar, A'bad

rji4j57>

1.80 QQ3

1963-64 I Q 6 4 - 6<¹7vT VJ

680 1 Daljitsinghji Hlmmatainghji Maharaja of I d t rT Himrnatnagar . . . ..

3>

it

I,OO,047 i>°6,797 1,00,007 1,08,301

I9<53-64 1965-66 1965-66 1958-59

HtJF

Damodar Ramji, Okha . . . .. Dhanji Shamji, Mahuva, Gujarat . G.R. Jolly, C/o M/s. Jolly Brothers (P) Ltd.,

681 682 683

Indl.

Jamnagar

I96O-6l I96I-62 I9<52-63 1965-66

>*

1,33,955 I,4IJ93& 1,23,170 1,22,50s Hansraj Lalbhai DhankCVia) Upteta Harjivandas Vithaldaa Kotecha, Grain Market,

684 685

Jamnagar

. . . ..

I96I-62

1,12,283.

J. M. T h a k o r c, A d v o c a te G e n e r a l, G u j a r at Jflgk

686

C o u r t, A h m e d a b ad . . ..

1965-66

1,52,036

Jayantilal B. Kharawala, Astodia Road, Ahme-

687

ij

dabad

1963-64 1965-66

1,64,020 ^65,397

JayantUal Keshavlal C/o M/s. Pltambar Anandji,

688

1965-66

Slhor

1,51,804

Jayandrabhai Nareshchandra C/o M/s. N.

689

Manaukhram & Co., Opp. Doahiwada's Pole, Ahmedabad

J3

1964-65 1964-65

1,46,448 1,92,493 6 90 691

Jj

K. N. Mehta C/o Maharana Mills, Pocbandar . Bai Kanchangauri Mangaldas, Lai Darwaja, Ahmedabad . . . ..

1964-65

r,33,36i

6 92 Krishnalal Jayantilal C/o M/s Pitamber Anandji,

HUF l965-6fi

Sihor

1,83,100

693 Laijibhai Jivaram Gajja, Naroda Road, Ahme-

Indl. 1965-66

dabad

1,74,779

694

1963-64

Laljibhni B. Kharawala, Astodia Ro"J, Aiimc- dabad . . . . . ..

T/-J£TJ- fZ£

}}

1961-62

M. N. Mehta C/o Maharana Mills, Porbandar

693

i,i3>48" 1,02,104 i3>77o Indian Incomt 27,30,200 T.W.I.

Massuamali Jafferall Merchant, Hill Drive,

696

J3

Bhavnagar

1959-60

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

1963-64

1)94*465 1,31,826 2)33,545 2,39,471 1,22,781

Naglndas Daulatram, Maskati Market, Ahmeda-

"97 :

bad

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

^69,5(5? 1)35,424 1,09,391

698 ]

JJ

Mareshchandra Mansukhram C/o M/s. N. Maa- 8ukhram& Co., opp. Doshiwaia's Pole, Ahmedabad

1964-65

1,44,400

tfavnithbhai Gordhandas, New Cloth Market,

"99 1

ft

1962-63

Ahmedabad . . . ..

1,02,5 ig

*Javinchandra Jayantilal, C/o M/s. Pitamber

700 1

JJ

Anandji, Sihor

H

701 1 STutan Chamanlal, Lai Darwaja, Ahmedabad

1965-66 1963-64 1964-65

i.7o,82y r,94)234 I . 5 3 , 9 6I

vlaharana Rajasaheb Shri Pratapsiahji Saheb,

702 1

ii

p a l a c e, W a n k a n er

. . ..

1960-61

11,03,054

I.G. Wankani C/o M/s. National Wire Products,

703 I

Gondal Road, Rajkot ;

1,10,880

1964-65

704

rg62-63

Indl.

1.07,998 Ranchhodlal Ramjibhai C/o M/s, Ramjibhai Hirji & Sons, Raipur Lapadi Wad, Ahmcdabad . Ranchhodlal Bumodardas, New Maskati Market,

705

Ahmedahad .

3J

1963-63

T,i7>344

706 Ramanlal Amratlal,' Reg. Office, Ellisbridgc,

Ahmedabad < .

1964.-65

HT5F

1,11,907

707 Maharajakumar Rajcndrasinghji Daljitsinghji.

1963-S4

Indl.

1,95,930 Himmatnapar . . . .. Rasiklal Narcshchandra C/o M/s. S, N. Man-

708

I9

sukhram & Co., Opp. Doshiwada's Pole, Ahmedabad . . . . ..

709

J>

Savitagauri ' manlai, Lai Darwaja, Ahmedabad Tulsidas ji, Okha Vircndr iiamonlal, Lai Darwaja, AhmcdabaJ . ".M,K. . Prithvisinhji, The Palace, Bhuj

19(14-61 1963-64 1965-66

1.44.793 1.02,550 1,08,791 1,78,931 1.79.647

GUJARAT—II

Ambalal Himatlal, Motibag, EUisbridge, Ahmcda-

713

Indl.

b"d.

1964-65 1965-66

1.33)313 1,68,754

Amitkumar Ambalal, Mot! Bagh, E. B., Ahmeda-

714

31

bad

>i

AmritlalRavjibhai, ManakChowk, Ahmedabad

715

>j

716 Arvlnd Narottam, Pankore Maka, Ahmedabad.

1965-66 1960-61 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

1,43,648 1,02,783 1,34,293 5,22,398 4,49,460

Ashokbhal Chimanbhai, Pankore Maka, Ahmeda-

717

bad

HUF

1^0,295

Ashokbhai Chimanbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahmeda-

718

Indl.

bad.

1964-6; 196061 1964-65

1.17,319

1,02,843

Smt. Baf Dlwali Wd/of Late Shri Marbheram

719

1961-62

Mathurdas, Uroach, Purja Road, Uroach.

HUF

1.11,883

Balkrishna Harivallabhdas, Shahibaug Ahmeda-

720

7,78,571 bad, ,

1965-66

Indl.-]

721

5*

Balkrinhna Ranchhodlal C/oM's.C.C. Rsnchhod- Iftl & Co., Near Kalupur Gate. Ahmcdabad. .

1965-66 1963-64

1,17.987 1,08,70a Babulal Somnath Dariapur, Ahmedabad. Balvantlal Chhotalal,Laldarwaja, Gundi Sheri,

7 22 723

1,82,339

1965-66

Surat.

724

31

196-1-65

1^42,586 Bhailal Chhotabhai Patel, Honorary Secretary, Charotar-Vidhyamandal, Valabh-Vidhyenagar, Tal. Anand, Dist. Kalra. . . .. Bhikhabhal Gkdharlal, New Cloth Market,

725

1960-61

ji

Ahmedabad

1^3.334

Chhotalal Maganlal, Laldarwaja, Gundi Sheri,

7aS

JS

Surat

727 728

Chimanlal Lalbhai, Pankore Naka Ahmedabad. ChimanUlLalbhal, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad.

HUF, Indl.

?>

739 730

ChirayuBh R. Amin Alembic Colony, Baroda-3 . Dhirajlal Hiralal, Mandvi Road, Baroda. .

ji

Dhirajhen B. Amin Alembic Colony, Baroda.

73i

1965-66 1965-66 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66

3,09.-494 1.75.639 1,61,421 1.54^545 1,87^89 1,15.266 1.91.503 3.I9.I75 1,05,873 1,12,878 4.45^017 2,48,795

Ganpatraj Premraj, C/o M/H. Prcmraj Ganpatraj,

732

1,16,727

>5

1963-64

New Cloth Market, Ahmedabad. .

Gajanan Pustakalaya, Prop. Shri Hiralal C. Thak-

733

>J

1.29,953 kar, Tower Road, Surat

1965-66

Girdharbhai Kalidas, New Cloth Market, Ahmc-

734

1960-61

dabftd

I.33- 3 :"

735 736

Girdharbhai Jethabhai of Bajwa, Baroda. , . Indl. Gunwant Mangaldaa, Manek Chowk, Ahmedabad. "

Haridas Achratlal, Kothari Pole, Ahmedabad. . „

737

1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1961-62 1962-63 1963-64

2,43.6ia l,94>203 1,54,490 T,22,098 1,17,821 I,O9,44a

HaribhaiR. Desai, Lakha Patel's Pole, Sankadisherl,

738

Ahmedabad. . . .. „

Hasmukhlal Chimanlal, Aserva, Ahmedabad. . „

7 39

1962-63 1962-63 1963-64

1,07,10* I>3°>I79 1=33,153

Hasmukhlal D. Reshamwala, Rampura Main

740

Road, Surat HUF. Hiralal Jethalal, Mandvi Road, Baroda. . . Indl.

741

1964-65 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1,26,039 2,03,230 3.34.2M 1,06,177 1.13)874

Ishvarlal Dayar am, Laldarwaja, Bandugronakaj

742

Surat

„

1964-65

3,40,005

Jaykrishna Harivallabhdas, Shahibagh, Ahmeda-

743

bad

I,8< .732

1965-66

Jayantilal Nathalal 'Sahakar', Jagbhai Park, Kan-

744

fcarfa, Mirinagar, Ahmedabad. . , . ,,

1964-65

1,10,741

745

Jivanias Rinurayan, C/o M/s. Chambaram Ramnarayan, Chinubhai Building, Cross Lane, Ahmedabad.

„ Kantilal Mviilal, Mwek Chowk, Ahmedabad. . „ Kastubhai Lalbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad. HUF.

746 747

1964-6j 1962-63 1964-63 1963-66 1965-66

i)io,39" 2,56,960 2,18,723 2,38,675 2, lS,09t

Indl.

Do Kauahik Keahavlal, White House, Ellisbridge,

748

Ahmedabad

„

1965-66

i3o6"527

Kantilal Trikamlal, Haja Patel's Pole, Ahmeda-

749

bad HUF.

1965-66

1,76,960

Kantilal C. Demi C/o Khandubhai Desai Road,

750

Vile Parle West, Bombay-56. , Indl-

1961-62

M i,o81

Keshavlal Mulchand, New Cloth Market, Ahme-

751

dabad

Lalbhai Dalpatbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahraedabad. HUF.

1960-61 1961-62 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

1962-63

1.59.708 i,59.583 3^41.854 2,25,297 2) 17,117 1,09,602 Smt. Lilavati Lalbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad. Indl. Manjbhai Virjibhai, Haslpura, Bhavani Wadj

753 754

19*18-59

Surat

„

l,OS,25l

Maheshchandra Parsottamdas Patcl, Housing

755

Society, Navsari. . . . .. ,,

1963-64

1962-63

i.37,65" Madhusudan Cbhaganlal, Rampura, Surat, . HUF. M nianM Premraj C/o M/s. Prcmraj Ganpatraj,

75<5 757

New Cloth Market, Ahmedabad. . . . Indl.

1963-64

1,81,182

Mohanlal Laliubhai, Sahkari Lati Bazar, Ahmeda-

758

baj

1965-66 1964-65

1,04,321

1,25,427

„ Mullibhai Devjibhai Chunarwad, Broach. . , „ Nandakumsr Ramanlal, Sankadlsheri, Ahmeda-

759 760

bad. . . . . . .. ,5

761 762

Nanubhai B- Amin Alkapuri, Baroda. . , „ Narottam Lalbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad. # HUF.

1963-64 196^-66 19^4-65 1965-66

1,22,362 2,4.6,570 2,50,272 2,80,204

Narottamdas Cl-iunilal & Co., Pro . Lalitkumar

7 6 3,

Narottamdas, fCapasia Bajar, Ahmedabad. , Indl.

1964-65

1,02,917

Natverlal Ishvarlal, Laldarwaja Bandugranaka,

764

Surat

1964-65

,t

3)55)57*

Navalrai N. Patel, Lakha Patel's Pole, Sankndi-

7"5

•heri, A h m e d a b a d. . . . .. ,,

Niran) an N a r o t t a m, Pankore Naka, A h m e d a b a d. H U F.

1,07,147 3,67,404 76(5

1962-63 1960-61 1964-65

3J54J9<>I

'

\I 3 4 5

Indl.

Niranjm Narottam, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad

IJ3O>°3J

1^43,180

1964-65

1965-66

T"

1,08,823

Indl.

1961-61

Niyogikumar K. Mahadevia, Asopalv, Shahibag,

Ahmedabad . . . . ..

Panachand B. Parikh, Lakha Patel'sJ?olc, Sanka-

7"9

Indl.

1962-63

1,08,287

ditheri, Ahmedabad . . . ..

Parasraj Ganpatrai, C/o. M/s. Premraj Ganpat-

770

1,16,165

raj, New Cloth Market, Ahmedabad .

H.U.F.

1963-64

Popatlal Prcmchand, C/o. M/8. Chimanlal Prcm-

771

1,79.883

1965-66

chand, Manekchowk, Ahmedabad

Indl.

Pooranraj Ganpatraj, C/o. M/s. Premraj Ganpat-

772

1,18,876

Indl.

raj, New Cloth Market, Ahmedabad

1963-64

Smt. Pushpavati Kantilal, Manck Chowk, Ah-

773

1,58,615

Indl.

1960-61

medabad . . . . . ..

Ramkrishna Harivtllabhdas, Shahibagh, Ahme-

774

1,76,767

1965-66

dabad

Indl.

Rajnikant Jcthalal Shah, C/o. M/s. Nadiad

775

jcf-4-65

ISf2-fe3

Indl..

H.U.I

Sanitary Fittings, Ahmedabadi Bazar, Nadiad

Ramanlal Chimanlal Khatri, Alkapmi, Baroda .

Ramanbhai B. Amin, Alembic Colony, Baroda-3

Indl.

776 777

1,00,58*

1,02,452

3.70=360

3 fi3*A06

Jc,t5-€6

Ramanlal Balwantlal, Laldarwaja, Gundi Shrri,

778

1965-66

Indl.

2,62,745

Surat . . . . . ..

RaHibhai M. Patel, 9-Pushpakun) Society,

779

I,1I,44O

Indl.T

IS63-64

Maninagar, Ahmedabad . . ..

Ratilal Rambhal, C/o. M/s. Gum Products

780

1,20,050

lc6l-62

Indl.

("India), Panchkuwa, Ahmedabad .

Sampatraj Premraj, C/o. M/s. Prcmiaj Ganpat-

7B1

Indl.

raj, New Cloth Market, Ahmedatad

Shrcnikbhai Kasturbhai, Pankoie Naka, Ah-

782

medabad . ..

.

Indl.

Shrenikbhai Kasturbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahme-

?"3

1163-64

1964-65

1965 f6

i$f4 f5

1965-66

H.U.F.

dabadi

• i,J7'53*

2,43.197

2,35,886

1,41=488

1,82,759

H.U.F.

Shantilal Mangaldas, Manek Chowk, Ahmedabad

7"4

1,23,044

T l6^Q

1,14,960

Indl.

1963-64

1964-65

iSU-65

Shwtilal MuliibhaijChunarwad. Baroach .

ShambhulalChhotftlal,Lald"rweja, Gundi Sheii,

7*5 786

3,66,706

1565-66

Indl.

Surat . . . . . ..

Maharani Shantadevi P Gaskwar, Palace Road,

787

Baroda . . . . . ..

1(65-66

1965-^6

1,30,014

1,52,219

Indl.

I Indl.

788 T89

2,69,283

1962-63

Indl.

Siddharth Kasrurbhai, Pankore Naka, Ahmedabad

Vijayshinh Chimanbhai, Pankore Naka,

Ahmedabad . . . . ..

Smt. Vimlaben Siddharthbhai, Pankore Naka,

790

Indl.

Ahmedabad

1963-64

1964-65

1,40,170

1,16,55a

A. Malini Amna, Jai Shree Cashew Co.,

791

Q u i l on

Indl.

1964-65

1965-66

2,59,378

2,11,317

A. M a l i ni A m na f or L a te K. K u n j u k r i s h na

792

F i l i a l, C a s h ew E x p o r t e r, Q u i l on .

C . C. M a n l, K o l e n c h c r ry . . .. C h e r i ya P a t h r o s e, K o l c n c h e r ry E . K . A. B h a d e r, K u m m a n am . . ..

793 794 795

Indl.

Indl.

Indl.

Indl.

Indl.

1965-66

1965-66

1965-66

IQ62-63

1963-64

1965-66

3,20,805

1,19,284

1,76,330

1,01,483

1,00,596

1.65,316

E . V. G e o r g e, K o l e n c h e r ry . . .. G o u ri L a k s h m i b a i, V l ll Princess of T r a v a n c o r e,

796 797

' Indl.

1965-66

T r i v a n d r um . . . . ..

1,31,634

G o u ri Parvathibai, VI Princess of T r a v a n c o r e,

798

T r i v a n d r um . . . . ..

Indl.

Indl.

1964-65

1965-66

1961-62

i,29,542

I.53.SIS

1,74^33

1 H . A. M o h a m cd Hanif, Z e n i th Oil M i l l s, Q u i l on 1 H a r t h a n d a v a r ma E k ya Rajah of T r a v a n c o r e,

799

I.':

Indl.

1964-65

T r i v a n d r um . . . . ..

1,25,661

8 01 H. M. Walter, Partner, Gemini Cashew Sales

Corporation, Quilon

1964-65 1965-66

Indl. Indl.

2,62,340 1,20,657 K, C. Chienyan, Ayiyoor, Tiruvalla . K. Divayani Amma, Jupiter Cashew Co.,

8 02 803

Quilon

Indl. •Jndl.

1964-65 1961-62

2,44>928 2,24,091 Dr. K. George Thomas, Kottayam . K Gopinathan Nair, Cashew Exporter,

B04 805

Indl.

Quilon

1,33^53 2,47,424

1964-65 1965-66

I 06 K. KochukrishnanNair, C/o. Gita Auto Mobiles,

I,I7>225

        Cilicut                                         Indl.             1965-66
807  K.  P.  Paul, Popular  Auto  Mobiles,  Trichur     Indl.             1965-66
8a8  IC  FC-nukutry,  ManaginK  Partner,  Malabar

1,12,875

Indl.

1965-66

Kni Way Service, Calicut ,

K. Kaijukrishna PiUai, Cashew Exporter,

So9

Qmlun . . , , . .. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

1964-65 1963-64 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66

2,33,961 I,o7)9i6 1,14-259 £1,16,834 1,17,704 I,I3>997 K L. Hrancis, K. P. L. Sons, Trinjalakuda K.P. Click J. Popular Auto Mobiles, Trichur . K. P. Fiirnnhi, Popular Auto Mibiles- Trichur K. P. T t m i H, Popular AUEO M ibilei, Trichur K. P. Vim, Pipular Auto Mobiles, Trichur K. Riviiilranathan Nair, Vijaya Lnkshmi

I ID 8 11 S l2 813 814 i i5

Indl.

1964-65

Cishew Co., Quilon

3J73>444

I16 Kakkubhai Chakubhai, Partner, M/s. Kakkubhai

Indl.

& Co.j Tnvandrum

1964-65 1965-66

I3i33567 1,40,609

I i7 L a k s h m i b a i, I P r i n c e ss of T r a v a n c o r e ,, T r i v a n d r um , . . . .•

Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1962-63

rij5o,850 51,39.061 M r s. L i l a b a i, E r n a ' k u l am . . .. M. B a l a k r i s h na R e d d i a r, P a r t n e r, M / s. S. T.

818 " I9

R e d d i ar & S o n s, Q u i l on . . ..

8 20 821 8 22

M. C h a c ko P i H a i, K o l e n c h e r ry M. K. Kuriakode, Kolencherry M. K. V e l l o d i, G a n d hi R o a d, C a l l c at

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66

1,02,305

2,38,160

1,19,104

1,33,282

! W J 2 54

Indl.

1965-66

IJ3O,5I3

824

Indl.

1965-66 1,00,856 M. N a r a y a n an N a i r, M a n a g i ng P a r t n e r, N. V. M o i or S e r v i c e, C a l i c ut . . .. M. R a i e n d ra R e d d i a r, P a r t n e r, M / s. S. T. R e d d i ar & S o n s, Q u i l on . . .. M. EUngaswarny R e d d i a r, P a r t n e r, S. T. R e d d i ar

"25

Indl.

1965-66 1,01,594 & S o n s, Q u i l on . .. r

N. B h a r a t h v k u t ty A m m a, Vijaya B h a r a ta C a s h ew

836

C o ., Q u i l on . . . . . . Indl. Indl.

1964-^5 1965-66

1,10,955 1,19,104 827 B28

Indl.

1,20,385

1964-65

829

Indl.

N. P. P o u l o s e, K o l e n c h e r ry . . .. N. S. N r ^ m m a l, A n g a di M e r c h a n t, C h a l a l, T r i v a n d r um . . . . .. P. G a n i r a i h a r an Pillai, P a r t n e r, M / s. K. P a r a- m e s w a r an Pillai, Q u i l on . . ..

1963-64 1964-65

1.22,552

1,19,872

Indl.

1963-64 i> 56,28 5 P. M a d h a v an N a i r, E r n a k u l am P. M. K ' j m a r a n, P a r t n e r, S a d hu B e e di D e p o t,

R30 " 3I

C a i i n a r i o rc n . . . .. Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1964-65

2y(8,O58 1569,766 *32 833

1965-66 1961-62 1964-65

1,57,424 2,70,922 3,21,308 834 fl35 836

Indl.

1965-66 2,26,078 P. M Paili Pillai, Kolenchcrry P. M. Sintha K u m a r i, C/o. Sadhu Beedi Depot, Indl. Cannanore , . - . •• IndL P. Narayanan Nair, Swaraj Motors, Kottayam . P. Ritnaawamy, Contractor Thaicaud, Trivandrum IndL P. Yesoda, Partner, Sadhu Beedi Depot, Cannanore . . . . .. R. Sreedhara Panicker, Amrutha Pradayani

"37

Vaidyasala, Thaicaud, Trivandrum

Indl. Indl.

1964-65 1965-66

1,92,943 1,32,618 838 839

Indl.

1965-66 R. M. Manckju, Ernakulam . . .. Sir Rama Varma, Maharaja of Travancore, Trivandrum . . . . ..

11,87.964

1,15,083

Indl.

1965-66

Rama Varma, I Prince of Travancore, Trivandrum S. M. Shahul Hameed, Partner, M/s. S. M.

• 40 841

1962-63

Indl.

1,10,442

Sulthan Pillai, & Sons, Chalai, Ttivflndnim . S. M. Syed Mohamed, Partner, M/s. S. M.

842

Sulthan Pillai & Sons, Calicut

Indl. Indl.

1962-63 1961-62

1,21424

1,', 0,095

"43 844

S. Vecraih Reddiar, Sceraati, AUcpjfEy Sethu Parvathi Rai, Maharani of Trayancore, Trivandrum . . . . .. V. Madhava Baligan, Camp Bazar, Caonanore . V. 0. Markose, Advocate, Kottayam

Indl. Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1965-66 1964-65

"45 846

4>&7>596 1325,307 1^3^65

MADHYA PRADESH

Atira) D h a n c a j, B h a g h a n a ra . . .. B. K. S e t h i, B i n od B h a v a n, U j j a in ,

847 843

H.U.F.

Indl.

1,36,25* 1,66,07^ 1,32,39*

1,11,29!

D. D. Y n u n g, A . E . I ., B h o p al . . ..

IndL

849

1,76,76* I.95.25S 2,86,480 2,88,15s

H.U.F. Indl. H.U.F. H.U.F.

1964-65 1961-62 1962-63 me>3-64 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1964-65 1961-62 1964-65 1964-65

, M3.479 2,22,60$ 1,26,791 1,01,003 D a y a b h ai J a l c h a n d b h a i, B h a g h a n a ia K. R. V o ra TStetnichand D h a n r a j, B b a g h a n a ra . R a m l al B u d h a m a l, D h a m t a ri , Sobhraj C /o M / s. M a n o h ar OH M i l l s, G a d di ]1W

850 831 852 853 854

Adda, Indore

IjO7,62O

V. G. Thakare, Khategaon .

Indl.

Indl.

1965-66 1964-65 1*38,503 855

MADRAS I

856

Indl. Indl.

1964-65 1965-66

3,80,539 1,05,558 Late A. Modaliania Mudaliar, Bharathi Bus Service, Sholinghur. . . .. A. D. Murton, A. & F. Harvey Ltd.3 Madurai . A. J. Craig Harvey, Madhurai Mills Co. L t d .,

SS7 858

4,96,564 2,4i,];o3 1,06,110

1965-66 1961-62 1965-66

Madurai . . . . . .. A. M. Buhari, 3/17, Mount Road, Madras-2 A, S. Sun Irarajan, Sivakasi . . .. A. W. Stansfleld, C/o Best & Co. (P) Ltd.,

859 8 60 861

Indl. Indl. InJl. Indl.

1,39,426 First Line Beach, Madras . . .. Amriclal Kamdar, 23, Brrabalu Chetty St.,

862

Indl.

3,24,470 2,27,226

1964-65 1965-66 1961-62

Madras-l. . . . .. Executors to the estate of Andrew Harvey, C/o

863

A. &. F. Harvey Ltd., West Veli Street, Madurai . . . . . ..

1965-66

1965-66 1965-66

Indl. Indl. Indl.

3,48,975 1,20,912 1,57^68 B. V. S. S. Mani, 94, Broadway, Madras-l B. V. Srinivasan, 63, G. K. Street, Madras-7 C. P- Srinivasaraghavan, 3-A, Ranganathan

B64 8S5 866

1065-1^6 iy6i-6i

Indl. Inil.

1,01,541

3i59,874

Chetty St., Nungambafckamj Madras-34 Ch. Subbarao, 3/4, College Road, Madras-6 Chandrakant N. Bhat, 2-A, Malaiaperual Street,

867 863

Inil.

MiJrai:,

1965-66 1,47,032 Cmndulal Kamdar, 23, Errabalu Chetty St.,

869

Indl. Init. InJl.

1961-62 1965-66 1965-66

2,16,192 1,18,324 1,44,702 Madra^-l . . . . . .. D. Ahmed Ali, 62/63, Scmbudose St., Madraa-i D. B. Madam, 164, Broadway, Madras-i , D. C. Kothari, Oriental Building, Armenian

870 871 872

Street, Madras-i

Indl.

1962-63

1,98,590

D. J. Lalwani, Hakim Mansions^ Loan Square,

873

Indl.

Madrag-i . . . . . ..

1965-66 1,25,46a

Dharalwn Lai Jaggi, 79/11, Sembudass St.,

874

Midras-i

InJl.

1964-65 1,05,654

E. M. Perianna Chetty, 16-B, Sterling Rood,

875

1964-65

Nangambakkam, Madres-34.

HUF

G. Venkatamuni, 38-B, North Beach Road,

"76

Madras . . . . . ..

1961-62

Indl.

G.B. Gourlay, C/o Parry & Co. Ltd., D a re House*.

"77

Madras . . . , .

Indl.

1961-62

1.99.753

G.H. Gann & G.O. Gamble, A. & F. Harvey

87S

Ltd., Madural . . . ..

Indl.

1965-66

4,57,824

879 G.N. G od Todd, C/o Parry & Co. L t d ., Dare House, Madras-i . . . .. Indl.

1961-62

1962-63

1,27,271

i3i5>93T

880 H . F. Craip Harvey, Madural MJU" Co. Ltd.,

Madurai

Indl. Indl.

1965-66

1964-65

5=91.843

1.29,973

I. Md. Shamsuddin, 106, Mint Street, Madrea-i Sir J a m es D o a k, M a d h u r ai Mill* C o. L t d .,

881 882

M a d u r ai . . . . . ..

Indl. Indl.

1965-66

1965-66

4,80,151

1,12,458

Jamnadass Hansraj, 212, G.N. Street, Mfldras-2

Smt. Jothi Venkatachalam, 1-3, Broadway,

883 884

Madras-i . . . . ..

Indl.

1964-65

1,11,242

K. Ganapathiya Pillai, Ganapathy Motor Ser-

885

vice, Nagarcoil

Indl. Indl.

1965-66

1965-66

1,29, 16

1,18,590

K. Gopalakrishnan, 29, Mount Road, Madras ,

K.A.M.A.K, Kalimuthu Nadar, South Raja

886 887

Street, Tuticorin

.

Indl.

1965-66

1,10,121

Smt. K.B. Sundarambal, 13, Murrays Gate Road,

888

Madras-18

1963-64

Indl.

5,29,675 889 K.R. Sriranga Raja, Partner, Jayaratn Motor Service, Rajapalayam . . ..

Indl.

1965-66

1,27,473

K.S. Rangaswamy Raja, Partner, Jararam

890

Motor Service, Rajapalayam

1965-66

Indl.

1,31,947

Kamalam Srinivasan, C/o T he Hindu M o u nt

891

Indl.

1962-63

Indl.

1964-65

1,10,269

1JJ5>356

Road, Madras . . . . .. L. Satramdas, 125, Godown Street, Madnu L.V. Ramaiah, 1, Thathammhinppfln St.,

S92 893

Madras

Indl.

1965-66

1,68,968

M. Natejan, 4, Dr. Guruswami Mudaliar Street,

894

MadraB-10

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

1961-62

1963-64

1963-64

1964-65

2,48,573

1.39,104

1,90,443

1,54,643

M. Sulaiman Zackria Sait . . ..

M. Yunus Zackria Sait

M.CT. Muthiah, 30, Coral Merchant Street

M.CT. Pathachi, 30, Coral Merchant Strcot*

895 896 897 898

Madras-i

899

HUF Indl.

1964-65

1965-66

1,25,443

1,31,070

M.K. Raju, C/o India Pistons Co. Ltd.

M. R. Radha4 38, Venkatrama St., Srinirasa Aye-

"°°

1961-62

nue, Madras-28

Indl.

1,94,525

M.S. Ramaratnam, 3/16, Linghi Chetty Street,

901

M"dras-I

,

HUF Indl.

1963-64

1965-66

1,69,363

1,11,446

M. V. Venkatnunan, Mount Road, Madras . Milapchand R. Shah, 1/2, Royapuram Beach R d .,

902 "03

Madraa-13 . . . . ..

Indl.

Indl.

1961-62

1961-62

3,59,&74

1,63,491

Mir. M d. Ali, M . M. Ali Motor Service, Vellore . Smt. N. Kannammal, C/o NaMi Chlnniswami,

#04 905

Madras-17 . . . ..

Indl.

Indl.

1964-65

1964-65

i,O4,?44

1,21.618

906 907

Indl. Indl. Indl.

1964-65

1964-65

1964-65

1,08,121

1,18,360

1,26,866

908 909 9 10

N. Krishnamal, C/o Nagammal Mills, Nagercoll, N. Kuppaswami, C/o M/s. Nolli Chinnaswami, Cloth Merchants, Panagal Park, Madras-17 , N. Rajammal, C/o Nagammal Mills, Nagercoil . N, Ranganathan N. Thangammal, C/o Nagammal Mills, Nager-

Indl.

1964-65

1,16,731

coil

*'• 'I 3 5 3 4 ST. P. Saraswathiammal, Ranajayam Transport,

911 ]

Namakkal . . . . ..

1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66

1,00,932 1,02,150 1,28,667- I,66,o6r

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

sf.P.S.S. Soundaram, Sivakasi *T.R. Javaramma Raja, Rajapalayanj •Janala Bhat. 2, Malavaperumal StT Madras J.N. Menon, C/o B=3t & Co., (P) L t d ., First

912 1 913 i 914 1 915 I

Line Beach, Madras-i . . ..

1965-66

Indl.

i,43,776:

P.P. C. Soundararajan, 209, East Masi Street,

916 '.

Madurai . . . . . ..

1964-65 1961-62

1,00,777- 1,06,487

H UF Indl.

P.V. Gijapathy Raj, 7, Woods Road, Madras-2 P.V. Mackay, C/o. A & F Harvey L t d ., West

917 ; 918 :

Velij Mndurai . . . . ..

1965-66 1965-66

1,53^87 1,58,297

Indl. Indl.

919 i 920 •

Prntap Hansra), 212, G.N. Street, Mudras-2 Punamchnnd R. Shah, 1/2, Royapuram Beach

Road, Madras-13

Indl.

3,67,780.

1961-62

R. Paranthaman, Paranthaman Transport,

9 21

1965-66

Indl.

Guidyatham . . . ..

1.74.567

9 22 R. Ramanarhan Chettiar, 14, Pachayapca'a

College Hostel Road, Chctput, Madras-3i

HUF

1964-65 2,31,218 923 R.M. Arunachalam, Legal Heir to the Estate of Late Umayal Achi, 1, Nungambakkam High Road, Madras-34 . . . ..

1961-62

i,35iT69 4,65,816

Indl. Indl.

1965-66

924 925

R. M. King C/o Best & Co. (P) Ltd., Madras-i Rameshchandra K. Sutaria, 98, Mint Street, Madras . . . . . ..

Indl.

1965-66 1,56,536

Roshikalal Kamdar, 23, Errabalu Chetty Street,

926

1961-62

Madras . . . . . ..

2,19,847 1,53,12? 1,00,000

1962-63 1961-62

Indl Indl. Indl.

S, Gopalakrishna Konar Kovilpatti • S. Krishnaswamy Pillai, Salem S. Radhakrishnan, 7, T h a m bu Chetty Street,

927 928 929

Madras-i

1,71,242:

1,22,916

1965-66 1964-65

Indl. Indl.

S. Ramiih Konar, Koilpatti . . .. S. Rangarajan, C/o T he Hindu Mount Road,

930 93i

Madras-2

1962-63

Indl.

1,69,091

S. Sambu Prasad, 7, T h a m bu Chetty Street,

933

Madras-i

1965-66 1,61,843

Indl.

S. Vijayaranga Mudaliar, Lakshmisvaswiithi

933

Bus Service, Vellore

Indl.

1961-62 2t37.434

S .B. Ramakrishnan, 104, Amman Sannathi St.,

934

Madurai . . . . . ..

1963-64

1,12,34a

Indl. Indl.

1964-65 i"°9,357 S . S. M a c h a d o, T u t i c o r in . . .. S.S.T. Chari, C/o Best & Co. (P) L t d ., First

935 936

1965-66

Indl.

2.58,814

937

1,61,927

1965-66

Indl.

938

Line Beach, Madras-i . . .. Sashikant N. Bhat, 2-A, Malaiaperumal Street, Madras . . . . . .. Smt. Syed Sara U m a, 232, Angappa Naick St., Madras-i . . . . . ..

1961-6* 1,13,000

IndL

T. Durairajanj 337, T h a m bu Chetty Street,

939

1,37,706

1965-66

Indl.

Madras-i . . . . . .. T. Krishnakumari, 37, 1st Main Road, Gandhi

940

Nagar, Madras

1,33,745 4,66,674 1,10,229

Indl. Indl. HUF

1964-65 1965-66 1965-66

941 942 43

Indl.

T. Rogers, 13/15, North Beach Road, Madras-i T . M . N . M. Nagarathina Nadar, Virudhunagar . T . M . M . M. Sathasiva Nadar, Bazzai St., Virudhunagar . . . . ..

1964-65 1965-66

1,33,071 1.95,6 9

944 945 946 947 948

T. R. Ramashubramaniya Raja, Rajapalayam , T. S. Krishna, C/o T.V.S. & Sons, Madurai . T. S. Shanmugham . T. S. Srinivasan, C/o, T.V.S. & Sons, Madurai T. S. Rajatn, C/o T.V.S. & Sons, Madurai

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

1,25,571 l,57,2iH 1,02,285 146.416 M5>iz<)

1965-66 I9"i5-6S 1964-65 196S-66 n''5-i6

949

T. S. Unnamalai & Others, Legal heirs of late K. M. Alibu Ctcttiar, 81, Perambur Barracks Roa d,

Madras-i2

1961-62

2,00,911

Indl.

T.V.P. Nambiar, 3/7, College Road, Ni-ngam-

95°

bakkam, Madras-34

1,10,765

1,62,128

1,52,307

                                                                 Tndl.               1963-64
951   Tricumsee  Hansraj,  212,  G.N.  Street1,  Madras  . Indl. 1965-66
952   V.A.  Watts, C/o  India  Pistons  Ltd.,  Madras            Indl.               1964-65
                                                                                     1965-66

1,82,185

1,05,065

1,66,212

1961-63

1965-66

1961-62

1,07,185

Indl. Indl. Indl.

V. Kalidoss, 57-B, Llyods Road, Madras-14 V. K.Sami, Usilampatti, Prop. V.K. Sweets , V. Krishna Ghettiar, Salem . . .. V. K Thinivenkntachari, Advocate, 134, Lloyds

953 954 955 956

1965-66 1,02,014 R ^ d, M " d n s - 6. . . . ..

Indl.

V. Ribindranath, 31-A, First Line Beach, Mad-

957

1961-62

Indl.

ras-i

1.75,457

V. Subramania Mudallar, 16, G.N. Chetty Road,

958

1961-62

T. Nagnr, Madras-17

1,21,121

T34i,837 1,05, grtB 1,25,660

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

V. Venugopul, 31-A, First Line Beach, Madras-i V. Vyasarao. Madras . . . .. Vadilal P. Mehra, 7, Godown Street, Madras . V'iishabi Animal & Others Legal Rep. ot Late

1,78,209

959 9 60 9 61 9 62

1961-62 1965-66 1064-65 1960-61

Indl.

Samlal Sahib, Namakkal,

i.4Si363

1961-62

Indl.

Snv. Valliummai Aehi, i-B, N. H. Road, Madras, Esti c of Virihi3w4my Iyengar, No. 4, Pattulo

963 9 64

1,02,513

Indl.

Road Mou.it Road, Madras-2 .

1965-66

MADRAS-II

Indl.

1965-66 I J 5 9 > 4 9⁸ A. Somasundara Reddiar, Tiruchirapftlli. A.K. A. CT. AL. Chidambaram Chettlar,

965 966

Kottayur.

A. M. Shahul Hameed (Deceased) Trichy.

967

HUF Indl.

1,48,628 i}74>°97 IJ23>764

1965-66 1962-63 1963-64

HUF

1,03,832

1963-64

• 68 969

Indl.

A. R. Damodara Mudaliar, Cuddalore. C. Gopal Chettiar, Paddy and Rice Merchant, Pollachl. . . . . ..

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

2*41,736 IJ95>889 3J3<5394*

C. Ramakrishnan, C/o Standard Commercial

970

Indl.

Corpn., Avanashi Road, Coimbatore,

1965-66 1,00,398 C. K. Ravi, Partner: M/s Chandrika Pro-

971

Indl.

ducts, R. S. Puram, Coimbatore.

1965-66 1,07,131 C. R. Narayana Rao, 6-G, Karpagambal Nagar,

972

Indl.

Madras-4.

2,14,569

1964-65

C. T. A. C. T. S. P. Subramanlam Chettlar,

973

1,25,691

A. Alagupuri.

1,16,163

1965-66 1964-65 1962-63

I"23JI75

974 975 976

1,20,864

HUF Indl. Indl. Indl.

Late D. Shanmugaraja, Sivaganga.. , F. W. J. Penn, Ootacamund Smt. G. Kannammal, C/o Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd., Coimbatore. . . . ..

1965-66

G. Venkataswami Naidu, C/o Laxmi Mills Co.

977

Indl.

Ltd., Coimbatore

1,96,324 2,10,216

1964-65 1965-66

Jayalakshmi DuraiBwami, 45, Bau Zullah Road,

978

1,09,618

Indl.

Madras-17.

19641-65 1965-66 ijO7,752

1,20,030

1965-166

Indl.

V

K. Devaki Ammal, Pucukottai. K. Sama Naidu, Cotton Merchant, Punjal,

979 98o

1,51,217

Indl.

Puliampatti.

1964-65

K. Srinlvasan, 'Kalpana' Avanashi Road,

981

1,11,928

Indl.

1965-66 Coimbatore. . . . . ..

lii !

&"s ,

(1 2 5 3 4 9 82 K. Sundaram, C/o Laxml Mills Co. Ltd.

Coimbatore

Indl.

1963-64 1964-65

2>79>3i* 2,81,066

K. T. Ramachandran, 25, 2nd Main Road,

983

Madras-2. , . . _ .

1965-66

Indl.

1,19,685

Kasiviswanatha Iyer, 11-12, East Mada Street,

984

Madras-4.

1965-66 1,49,796

Indl.

L. L. Narayanan, 47, Velacheri Road,

985

MaJras-32

Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1965-66

1,12,485 i3i8,437 M. Jaynrvn, Murugan Roadways, Cuddalore. . Smt. M. Miriammal, C/o Angu Vilas, M.

986 987

V. Muthiah Pillai Firm, Dindigul.

1965-66 1965-66

Indl. Indl.

1,58,268 1=32,599 M. M a r a i j e s a i i, C u d d a l o r e, . . .. M . A. M u r u s a p p a n, 9, S a n t h o mc H i gh R o a d,

988 .989

M a J r a s - 2 8.

Indl.

1,02,037

1964-65

990

1961-62

Indl.

1,08,937

M. A. R ' i z a c k, N o. 3 8, M o o r t hy C h e t ty S t r e e t, K u m b a k o r a n. . . . . .. M.R. Murugappan, 9, Santhome High Road,

•991

Madras-28

1965-66 1962-63

1,04,425 1*04,470

Indl. Indl.

Mrs. M, H. Pcnn, Ootacamund. M- M. Murugappan, 9, Santhome High Road,

992 993

1,19,974

1964-65

Indl.

Madras-2tf

M- V. M. Angamuthu Pillai, C/o Angu Vilas

994

M.V. Muthiah Pillai Firm.

1965-66

Indl.

IJ5²;.375

M. V. M. Ctiellamuthu Pillai C/o Angu

995

1965-66

Vilas, M. V. Muthiah Pillai Firm.

HUF

1,61,868

M. V. M. Veeramuthu Pillai, C/o Angu Vilas, M.

99<5

V. Mathiah Pillai Firm , Dindigul.

1965-66

Indl.

1,52,297

N. Arunachalam Chettiar, Chettiar, Koppana-

'997

patti. .

1965-66 1962-63

Indl. Indl.

1,00,157

11,32,643

N. D i m i a r a n, Race Course, Coimbatore. N- Djraiwamy, C/o M/a. D. P. F. (P) Ltd.,

998 999

P. M. Palayam, Coimbatoro.

71,02,135 [ 3,15^00

1962-63 1962-63

Indl. HUF

N. Mi'ulingam, "Sakthi Nilayam", Pollachi. N- S'-nmusham Chettiar, C/o G. M. S (P)

TO01

Ltd., Tirupur.

1960-61

Indl.

IM 1.544

N. Vinailianj C/o Sounderaraja Mills, Dindi-

1965-66 £1,24,871 gul.

1965-66 1964-65 1964-65

1,08,781

2,09,498

2,00,611

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

Smt. P. Siradha, Race Courae, Coimbatoro. P. R. N irayanaswami, Patel Road, Coimbatore. P. R. S iT-vmniarn, Patcl Road, Coitnbatore. . P.R. Vi=iwinathan, C/o M/s. Sreevatsa Engineer-

1003

1004

1005

1006

ing a.il Trading Co., Patel Road, Coimbatore. Indl.

1963-64 1964-65

i,20.537 2,14,949

1007

P. S. V. G apalakrishnan, 74, A. Kothavalcha- vaii, M i i r a s - 1 5. . . . ..

1008

P. V. R i i l n k r i s h n a n, Pcelamedu, Coimbatorc. .

Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1962-63 1963-64

1,67,610

i)28,34i

IJ35J427

1009

P.V. Rijkumar, 'Kamla N i l a y a m ', Peelamedu,

C j i m i c i r e. . . . . ..

1965-66 1963-64

'1,00,575

i 1,19,311

Indl. Indl.

R\]^ if Piiiukottai, Pudukottai . R. K- K u i l i s w a my Chettiar, Trichy Road, Coim-

i o io i on

bitore. . . . . . .. I n d l.

1964-65 1965-66 1948-49

1,39,675 2,60,568 1,54,900

Indl. Indl.

R. R.. S"r-ni, 1, Southern Avenue, M i d r a ^ - 1 8. P. V. ViUippa Chettiar. . . .. R i i i v v i ri Vadachalam, Burmah Shell Agency,

1012

1013

1014

Indl.

1963-64

C u i J a l o rc

1.53.733

1015

1964-65 1,23,400 S. Arolciyaswamy Pillai, S. R. V. S. Private Li-nitci, Kumbakonam. . . ..

Indl. S. '?. 1* '•C Sicyanarayana Rao, 6, Krishnamachari Indl.

1016

R r j i, M i i r a s - 3 4.

Indl.

1,30,524

1964-65

S. K i n v i r a d h an , C/o. Lakshmi MilU C o. L t d.

1017

1965-66 Coimbatore. . . .. Indl.

1,17,079

e.

. 18, / A xi, . |* "~I 2 3 5 4 S. M. Ebrahim Sait, Mount Salt, Mount Road,

1018

Madras.

Indl.

1965-66 1,46,226- S. N. ASA. Annamalai Chettiar, Kottayur.

1019

Indl.

(NOR)

12,401

i9<>3-64

*2>53A57

Indian

Income

I.W.I.

S.'Radhakrishnan C/o G. M. S. (P) Ltd.,

1020

Tirupur. . . . . ..

Indl.

1960-61

1,06,719-

1021

Indl. Indl.

1961-62

1964-65

I.26 H4AIJ*UJJJ'T I,IO,l67 T. A. Kuppuswamy Chettiar, Partner in M / s. T. A. Kuppjawamy Chettiar & Co., Mettur Road, Bavani. . . . . .. T. B- Subbiah, Tcxmo Industries, Coimbatore. T. G. K. Raman, 47, Vellacheri Road,

1022

1023

Madras. 32

1965-66

1)53, "a 1,21,534. 1,07,776 2,19,623 1,11,965

HUF Indl. Indl. Indl. HUF

1965-66

1963-64

1964-65

1963-64

Mrs. T. H. S thna, Coimbatore.

Mrs. T. Krishnaraj, Cuddalore.

T. Nissar Ahmed, 35, Broadway, Madras-i.

V. Guruviah Naidu R.G. Street, Coimbatore. .

V. N. Ranfianathan, Santhi Nilayam , 6th Street,

1024

1025

IO26

1027

1023

Saibaba Colony, Coimbatore.

V. N. Rao, 53, Peter" Road, Madras-6. .

1029

Indl. Indl.

1963-64

1963-64

1964-65

1.36,574 1,29,533 1,44,469.

V. Subramaniam, C/o. G. M. S. (P) Ltd.,

1030

Indl.

Tirupur. . , . , , .

1960-61

1,08.40*

V. Vecraraghavan C/o G. M. S. (P) Ltd.,

1031

Indl.

Tirupur.

1960-61

1961-62

1.01,573

1,20,088

MADRAS CENTRAL

Indl.

A. C Chacko, Ollur.

103a

I959-"O

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

1,02,265

1.09,739

1,14,28*

1,12,276

B. Vittala Acharya, Madras                       Indl.           1964-65       1,44446
C. A. Dcvika, 6^, rst Main  Road, Madrti-28  .   Indl.            1964-65      1,11,828
C. V. Sridhar, 39, North  Boag Road,  MtdrM-17   Indl.            1961-62      1,05,861
G. D. Gopal, Coimbatore                          Indl.            1962-63   .  1,60,465
G. R. DamoJaran,  Peelamedu.                    HUF              1960-61      1,32,969
G. R. Govinjarajulu,  Peelamedu    .    ,     ,  HUF              1960-61      2,77,2 JO
G. R. Varadara)aly,  Peelamedu.                  HUF              1960-61      1.36,793
G. R. Venkatestlu,  Peelamedu.                   HUF              1960-61      1,29,006
T.  Bhawarilal, Chickpet, Bangalore.  .          H UF             1961-62     3,14,740
K.  Narayanappa,  22, Cubbon  Road,  Btnj"lore.. Indl.            1961-62      I,l6,060
K.  A.Thatigivelu,  17, Rajabather  St., , "  .

1033

1034

1035

1036

1037

1038

1039

1040

104' I

I CM 2

1 04

1961-62

Indl.

M i , 0 3" Madras 17.

1O44

1961-61

Smt. Ponnammal, Legal, representative and wif* of late S. A. K. Nanjappa Chettiar, Coimba- tore.

Indl.

1)29,543

Late R. Rama Sctty C/o M/". H"numanth"ppa

1043

& Sons, Davangere.

1964-65

1965-66

Indl. Indl.

1^7,795

2.39)999

R. Venkatapathy, Avanashi Road, Coimbatore. . R. R. Srinivasamurty, C/o M/s. R. Hanumantha

IO46

IO47

fc Sons., Davangere H UF

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

1957-58

1961-62

1.31.559

i>*9,235

1.88,327

2,;8,8oi

3.37,4O0

Indl. Indl. Indl.

R. R. Srinivasamurtv, Davangere. .

S. Sivaramakrishna Iyer, Trivandrum.

S. P. Ramiah Nadar, Taya Mansion, Madras- 3..

T. Govindarajan , i-A, Shanmugm Mudali St.,

1048

1049

1050

1051

1961-62

Royapettah, Madras

Indl.

1,51.164

T. R. Rajakumari, 134, Habibullah Road, Madras

TO52

1,08,456

-17. . . . . . .. Indl.

1961-62

1961-62

3>i9>59i 1053 Vyjayanthirnala, Alwarpet, Madras.

Indl.

I,i8,66l

1965-66

Indl.

MYSORE A. Vittal Shenoy, Police Rd., Bangalore . B.A. Rao, Rico Trading Col. N.R. Rd., Banga-

1054 1055

iji6,577

1965-66 1965-66 2,03,623

Indl. Indl.

lorc-2 . . . . . .. B.D. Kakatkar, Belgaum . . .. B. Subraya Baliga, Anand Transport & Printers;

1056 1057

1,29,48*

1965-66

' Indl.

Mysore

5)61,95* 1,45,585 1,46,57a 1,50,000 I , 5 2 J ° 57

1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1964-65 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66

i,l6,oil 1,03,422 1,19,60a 1,23.943 1,68,553

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. HUF H UF Indl. Indl. Indl.

C.A. Palnikar, Harihar . . .. C.R. Sonalkar, Harihar E.F. S'.arke, H A L, Bangalore , E.J. Ruth, H A L, Bangalore . . .. E. Mayer, H.A.L., Bangalore G. Mahadevappa, Davangere G. Siddalingappa, Davangere . . .. H. Hartman, H.A.L., Bangalore H.G. Eyting, H.A.L., Bangalore H. Schneider, H.A.L, Bangalore J, N. Gurjar. C/o Kirloskar Elec. Company,

1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068

4,76,241

1965-66

Bangalore

Indl.

1069

Jayantnilal Gokuldas , C/o M/s Jayanthilal Bor!

1965-66 1965-66

1,36,671 1,44,382

indl. Indl.

K. H. Srinivasa, Bull Temple Rd. Bangalore . K. Gururajachar C/o Neo Mysore Cafe,

1070

1071

Bangalore-9 . . . . ..

1964-65 1965-66

1,27,9°! 3,46,03*

Indl. Indl.

D r. K. W. Tank, H A L. B'lorc Smt, Kanakammal, 338 1st Bock, Jayanagar,

1072 073

1,94,621

1965-66

Bangalore-11 J .

1965-66 2,73,17*

Indl. Indl.

L. Mittelhuber: H A L, Bangalore . . .1 M. C. Marinanjundaiah Hospital Contractor,

1074 1075

1965-66 1,34,333 V. V. Hospital Rd. B'lore . . .. HUF

M. Kavcri Bai, M/s Anand Transport & Printers,

1076

1,76,924

1965-66

Mysore . . . . . .. Indl.

M. M. Laxmana Setty P/r in M/s Sharavathi

1077

1,08,95a

1963-64

Constructions Co. Kargal . . .. Indl.

M. R. Paraauram, M/s Mysore Minerals & Gass

1078

1,24,119

1965-66

Co., J. C. Wadayar Road, Bangalore . Indl.

M. Vinoda Rao, M'lore Ganesh Bcedi Works,

1079

1,97,687

1965-66

Mysore . . . . . .. Indl.

1080

1,56,814

1965-66

Indl.

Smt. Mohana Parthasarathl, C/o M/s Srinivasa- charlu & Co. Sri N. R. Road, Bangalore-2 . N. G. Iycngar, 179, X V II Cross Mallcswaram,

1081

2,09,572

Bungalore-3                                               Indl.                1965-66
                                                          Indl.                 1965-66          1,52,057
                                                           Indl.                1965-66          1,05,434
                                                          -.  Indl.             L965-66         2,59,96:I

I08z

1083

1084

1085

P. Rothkegal, H A L, Bangalore Pratap Singh Chaganlal, Raichur R. L. Kirlostoir, M/s. Kirlosk.ir and Co., Baigi'.-u- S. M. Parvathamma Venugopul l'lour Mills

H7"336

1965-66

Indl.

Bungalore-2. . ..

S. M. Satyanarayana, "Venugopal Flour"

1086

1965-66 Indl.

1087

Indl. HUF

Indl. Indl. Ind. Indl.

I n d l. Indl.

1965-66 1965-66

^37,760 I.i5,359- U Suresh Mallya, Bander, M'lore V. N. Sunder, Std Brick & Tile Co. Yelahanka T V. T. Padmanabhan & Sons, High Grounds

1095

1096

1097

Bangalore

1,07,010- i>07,734

HUF HUF

1965-66 1965-66

V . T. Velu & Son* Venamalldas Gokuldaa, M/" Jayantilal Bros.

I09S 1099

M'lore

W. Kotch, H A L, Bangalore . . ..

1100 H OI Y. Moideen Kunji, Mangalore

Indl. Indl. I n d l.

I)55,48"' 3,60,000

1965-66 1965-66 1963-66]

1102

a.44.884

I n d l.

1965-56

Y. U. Rangiah, States Picture House, Bangalore N A G P UR ( T R A I N I N G)

1103

1104

1105

Hindustan Mills Stores, Nggpur . .. Dr. R. G. Nalamwar, Nagpur Satyanarain Nathulal, T u m s ar

Indl. Indl. Indl.

1961-62

1961-62

1961-62

2,00,000- 1,26,573 1,34^9*.

P O O NA

1963-64 1964-65 1961-62

1,15,297

1,08,424

1.92,613

HUF HUF HUF

B. B. Marathe B. K. Sanghavi, no Shivajinagar, Poona-S B. S. Redkar, Vengurla . . .. Smt. Chanchalabai Sanghavi, no Shivajinagar,

1106

1107

1108

1109

Poona-5

1964-65 1961-62 1961-64 1965-66 1965-66 [1962-63

HUF Indl. HUF - Indl. Indl. Indl.

1,00,740' 1,87,163 T,00,598 1,20,940. 2,33,925 IJ39>423 D. S. Malu, Madhavnagar . . .. G. B. MaraThe. . . . . .. H. M. MohJte, MaJ. Genl., Shramgad, Poona-7 J. L. Snowhall Jairambhai Dayabhai Nasik Road Liladhar Ranchoddas, Prop: J. L. Goani Mills

mo I I II 1112 1113 1114 1115

1961-62

Bhiwandia . . . . ..

1.45,551

1961-62 1962-63 1965-66

1,13,819 1,01,404 1,09,665 23O3.-<573 I,o6=8i8 1,40,281 1,11,376 2,30,395 1,08,866

HUF TOF I UF [ndl. ilUF HUF Indl. HUF !ndl. Indl. Iddl. HUF Indl. HUF

1116

1117

1118

1119

1120

II2I

1122.

1123

1124

1125

1126

1127

1138

1129

1130

1131

M. C. Lohiy?, 1105, RaviwarPcth, Poona . I M, R. Mithsnnlli, 1210 Bhavanipeth, Poona . I M, S. Kirloskar, Kirloskar PrcRS Poona . . 1 N. K. Joshr, KirloskarwadJ, Sungli . . ] P. K. Sanj?liavi, i ro Shivajinngar, Poona-5 M/s Parsha Efig. Co. Prop: M.B. Kripalani . : R. K. Sanghavi, no Shivajinagar, Poona-5 R. N. Shaha, 246, Raviwar Pcth, Poona . ] R. T. Doshi, Shivajinagar, Poona-5 Rasiklal Ratanchand Havell . . . Raia of Kolhapur, Kolhapur . . .. Rijumal Thakurdas Karachiwala, Ahmednagar S. K. Sanghavi, no Shivajinagar, Poona-5 S.L. Kirloskar, 1065 Shivajinagar, Poona-y Trimbaklal Jairambhai, Nasik Road Vrajlal Ratachand Haveli . . ..

I,I3J5O9 5,62,079 1,21,890 1,10,239 2,80,314 1,01,849- 1.13,510

HUF Indl. Indl.

1965-66 1964-65 1961-62 I964"65 1961-62 1962-63 1965-66 1965-66 1961-62 1964-65 J962-63 1962-63 1965-66

P U N J AB

ATtar Singh C/o M/s. Darbara Singh & Sons, Bagh

1131

Ramanond, Amritsar

1.95.966

1,81,316-

2,30,405

1961-62 1963-64 1964-65

Indl. Indl. Indl.

1133

2,82,68r

Indl.

1964-65

D o. Do. D. D. Puri C/o Samwati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. Yamunanagar . . . . .. Gian Chand P r o p; M/s. Continental Travel

*I34

8,25,201

1961-62

Indl.

Service, Hoshiarpur

Gian Chand Taxali Prop; M / s. N ew Diamond

1135

Foundry, G .T Road, Batla

1961-62 1964-65

i.55,<593 1,94.644

Indl. Indl.

I-I. R. Modi, Patiala . .. Hans Raj Jain C/o M/s. Rattan Chand Harjas

1136 " 37

1.10,555

Indl.

1964-65

Ral, Guru Bazar, Amritsar . . .. Harbans Lai C/o M / s. Modan Roller Flour Mills

1138

1965-66

Indl.

1,49,23s Jullundur

Hardial Singh Babbar, c/o M/s. Indore Steel &

Rs.

" 39

Iron Mills, Krishna Market, Amrltsar .

H . U . F. Indl. H . U . F.

1961-62

1961-62

1961-62

4,48,431 1,14,194 2,00,741 Harkishan Lai Kuthalia, Hoshiarpur Hazari Mai Kuthalia, Hoshlarpur Hira Lai c/o M/s. t a ll Woollen Mills, G.T.Rd.

1140

1141

1142

Amritsar . .. .

1962-63

1964-65

i,39>859 I.O3.5I7

. D o. Do.

Do. I.M. Sakhuja c/o M/s. Jagjit Engg. Works,

" 43

Kapurthala

Indl.

1965-66

1,28,612

" 44 Jas Ra) c/o M/s. Straw Board Mfe. Co. Ltd., Hoshiarpur . . . . ..

K. K. Amla, Residency Road, Srinagar

Indl. Indl.

1965-66

1964-65

1,00,160

1,07,060

1145

1146

1961-62

HUF

M6.59J K.R. Sarin ( H U F) c/o M/s. Royal Foundry Rly., Road, Batala . . . . .. Kirpal Singh C/o M/s. Darbara Singh & Sons,

U 47

Bagh Ramanand, Amritsar

Indl. Indl. Indl.

1961-62 1963-64 1964-65

Do. Do.

"jio,335

1.89,133

i35*4*J

P U N J AB

114S

Madan Lai c/o M/s. LaU Woollen Mills, G . T.

Rd, Amritsar . . . ..

. H . U . F.

1962-63

1964-65

M5>8i9'

1.03)274

1961-62

H . U . F.

3.72.365

1149

1150

1960-61

HUF

2J94.<5*r

1151

Mangat Ram Kuthal:a, Hoahiarpur Mulkh Raj c/o M/a Jindal Steel Works, Maler- kotla . . . . . .. Smt. Promila Nayyar, c/o M/s. India Calico

Indl.

Printing Mills, Cheharta .

Indl.

1965-66

1963-64

i>57>823

1.01,035

ROOD KishQre c/o R. N. Hosiery, Ludhiana Sadhu Singh, c/o M/a. Auto Piston Mfg. Co.,

1152 " 53

Indl.

1965-66

Batala Road, Amritsar . . . .

1,11,742

Siri Ram Jindal c/o M / s. Jindal Steel Works,

1x54

HUF

1960-61

7.75=868 M'jilerkolla . -

" 55

Indl, Indl.

1156

1.55.087

1,70,403

Tansukh Rai Ram Math, Prop. Nand Lai Gcncri- wala, Sirsa . . . . .. Tirath Ram Amla, Residency Road, Srinagar Do.

Indl.

1960-61

1962-63

1961-62

I.O9.-355

1157

Indli

1964-65

1,05,170

115S

Raja Upindra Krishan Koul, Pratap Villa, Sri- nagar . . . . . .. Smt. Vidya Wati c/o M/s. Khem Chand Vijay

Kumar, Tanda Rd., Jullundur

Indl. Indl.

1963-64

1964-65

1,06,877

246,879

Do. Vijay Kumar c/o M/s. Khem Chand Vijay

1159

Kumar, Tanda Road, Jullundur

Indl. Indl.

1963-64

1964-65

1,06,877

2^6,877

Do. Wali Ram c/o M / s. Jindal Steel Works,

1160

Malerkotla

H 61 Yadvindra Singh Ji, Maharaja Patiala

HUF Indl.

1960-61

1962-63

4.90,620

3,52,000

R A J A S T H AN

1162 1163 1164 U65 1x66

Anand Singh Kachawah, Jodhpur . Smt. Chandri Devi Bamjur, Didwana Dhanni Devi DugRar, Sardarshar . Hanuman P d. Manslnghka . . .. Hemant Singh of Dholpur . . ..

Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.

1964-65

1965-66

1965-66

1965-66

1963-64

1964-65

I95<5-57

1965-66

1960-61

1965-66

1961-62

1965-66

1965-66

1,02,622

1,02,928

rji3.9o7

1,14,210

1.12,538

1,11,660

1.35.5"

1,70,131

1.39.3IJ

1,68,46

1,06,918

2,61,251

1.07,878

HUF Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl. HUF

Hiralal Maliram, Bhilwara . . .. Jhabarmal Dugar, Sardarshar . . .. Kcahri Singh (col.) of Bikaner M- K. Bhawani Singh, Rajmahal, Jaipur . Manak Lai Udaip\ir . . . .. Parshottam Dasa Bangur, Didwana . . Prahladrai Maliram, Jaipur . . .. Prem Raj Daulatram, Nawalgarh Katra Shri

U67 1168 1169 1170 U 71 U 72 " 73 H 74

Bhagwandass Jhtrajhunwala

HUF

1961-62

2,67,393

Rs.

1175

1176

1177

1178

117?

1180

1181

      Raj  Devi Surana, Bikaner           ,              Ind.              1962-63      1,64,10a
      Raj  Kumari Devi Bangur, Didwana                   Ind.              1965-66      1,07,560
      Rin?  Nath  Bangur,  Didwana .                     Ind.              1965-66      3,09,723
       Sir  Sawai Man Singh of Jaipur                     Ind.             1965-66     10,11,662
       Shivnaraln Tantia,  Sardarshar                     Ind.             1961-62       1,36,600
       Sohan Lai Duggar, Haldion-ka-Rasta, Jaipur     .   Ind.             1965-66       3,20,000
       Tulsiram Mahavir Pd,, Bhilwara                     Ind.             1962-63       1,75.829
                          U.  P .I
1182   Abdul  Himid  Bahadurganj,  Allahabad              Ind.              1961-62      i>40>95.3
1133   Abdul  Sakoor,  Bahadurganj, Allahabad   .         Ind.             1961-62       i337>93+
1184   Badri  PJ. Ayudhya  Pd. Jaswantnagar,  Etswah  .   HUF              1965-66       1,04,08'
1185   Bharat  Hari  Singhania,  Kanpvrr                  Ind.            !1965-66       1,29,04"
Ii36   O.  JM. Milhotra  Girrish  Bagar,  Kanpur ,        Ind.             1965-66       1,24,08'
1187   Smt.  Gecta  Rani,  Dwarka  Dheeah,  Kanpur        Ind.             1965-66       1,09,644
1188   Gopal  Krishan,  Kamla  Tower,  Kanpur   .         Ind.             1965-66       1,07,635
1189   Hari  S hanker  Shinghania, Kamla Tower,  Kanpur   Ind.              1965-66      2,16,13*
1190   Jagdish  Swarup,  ii-Hamilton  Road,  Allahabad    Ind.              1964-65      I,O3>46;
 1191  Jagmohan  Lai Kanodia,  Kanpur                     Ind.              1962-63      I , I O , 8 5"
 1192  K.  L. Misra,  Advocate,  Allahabad .              Ind.              1964-65      i,4i>25
 H 93  Kailashpat  Sinshania,  K a n p ur                 H UF              1965-66      i3i5,77'
 1194  Kailashpat  Singhania,  K a n p ur                 Ind.              1962-63      1,10,134
1195   Laxmipat  Siaghania,  K a n p ur . .     ..        Ind.             1962-63       1,59,853
                                                                           1963-64       1,48,06!
                    Do.                                   Do.               1964-65       1,79,953
                    Do.                                   Do.               1965-66      2,36,7s2
 II9
1,28,625
1208 ^A.  C. Jain C/o Miniature  Bulb  Industries of India,  Conveli Road, Dchradun  .
1962-63 1963-64 Do.
M6,37"
Ind. ind.
*2O9
A.  N. Agarwal, c/o Sheonarain  Karmendra Nnrain,  Aligarh  . . . . ..
G.  W. M. Whittle, c/o Plywood,  products  Sitapur Gancshi  Lai, c/o Laljimal  Tika  Ram, Hathras  . H,  Thomsan  c/o Plywood  Products,  Sitapur  . Mrs.  J. A. Thalmcsscnger
laro 1211 X2I2 1213
Do.
2,44,340 i.65,392 1,17,226 2,49,5r3 i,ir,9io 1,11,910
1965-66 196S-66 1965-66 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66"
1,15,000
1,26,266
Ind. Ind. Ind. Ind. Ind. Do. Ind. Ind.
Jai  Prakash,  n-Anand  Chowk, Dehradun Kanti  Prasad  Mittal,  Bijnor  *\  .  .  . M.  Missal c/o Himalaya  Drug  Co.,  Gandhi
1214
1215
1216
1965-66
Ind.
Road,  Dchradun  . . . ..
2,47,993
Naresh  Prasad  Mittal,  Bijnor Raja  Mohd.  Amir  Ahmad  Khan,  Moradabad  . Rajendra  Prasad  Mittal,  Bijnor Ramchandra  Lai c/o Laljimal  Tika Ram,  Hathraa Ram  Gtipal  c/o, Lalji  Mai Tika  Ram, Hathras  .
Sahu  Sambho Dayal, Advocate,  Bijnor
1965-66 1957-58 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66
1,26,174 3,48,525 1,75,793 i,27>37* 1,33*472 2,12,095 '217 xai8 J2I9 *220 *22I "222
HUF Ind. HUF Ind. Ind. Ind.
1  ivNarain  c/o Sheonarain  Karmendra Narain,
Aligarh
1962-63
I,3IJ3*"
Ind.
1224
1965-66
Ind.
2,37.34a
V.  N. Agarwal cfo  Sheo  Narain  Karmendra Narain,  Aligarh  . . . . ..

Sac.  3(11)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  %1, 1889  tfjfr
2
3
4
X
5
WEST  BENGAL-I
A. C.  Mitra,  18/2,  Ballygunge,  Circular  Road,
1225
Calcutta
; Indl.
yy
}}
1226
1227
A. E. Charlton  C/o  Statement,  Calcutta  . A. E.VC. Gibson, A.E.I.,  Calcutta
1963-64 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
1,02,068 i,c 6,275 1,19,222 i>°5;933 1,03,144
A. H.  Billimoria,  1, 2 & 3 Old  Court  House
1228
Street, Calcutta
3J
1965-66 1965-66 1965-66* 1965-66
2,21,713 1.333852 1,04,848 3,04,737 A.  K.  Dutta,  67, South  Knd Avenue,  Calcutta  . A. R,  Roy, 93, Park  St.,  Calcutta  . Ajflib Singh Sarda, 7,  Wellesly  Place, Calcutta  . Amitava Pal  Chowdhury,  P-17,  Mission  Row
1229
1230
1231
1232
)3
Extn.,  Calcutta  . . ..
JJ
1964-65 1966-67 1965-66 1961-62 1963-64
1,23,537 i,35>i48 1,32,241 17,27,133 1,03,922 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237
1961-62
3>
1,16,196
Anjali  Kr.  Bosc, C/o  G.  K.  W.,  Calcutta  . Ashoka Roy, 3, Upper Wood  St.,  Calcutta B. B. Daga,  3, Chittaranjan  Avenue, Calcutta  . B. C. Paul,  18, Netajee  Subhas  Road, Calcutta  . B. M.  Talukdar,  148C,  Anath Nath  Deb  Lane, Calcutta  . . . . . .. A  B. N.  Chowdhry,  7  Wellesley  Place,  Cal-
1237-
1963-64 1.08,677
i$
cutta  . , . . . . ,. B. P.  Khaitan,  IB,  Old  Post  Office  St.,  Cal-
1238
  cutta                                                yy              1965-66        1,75,526
B. P. Roy, 29, Netajee  Subhas  Rd., Calcutta    .     y>               1965-66       1,30,476
B.  S.  Mohatta,  19, British  India  St.,  Calcutta  .                 1961-62       3,25,374
Balai Lai  Pal., P-29,  Gariahat  Rd.,  Calcutta        3J              1965-66       i,S5,6oo
Banamali Das,  iS/C, Balygunge  Circular  Road,

1239
1240
1241
1242
         Calcutta                                                          1963-64
1243  Bonomalidas  Bagree, 138, Canning  St.,  Calcutta    JJ             1964-65
1344  Benoy  Kumar Dalmiya,  Room No. 1,  Stephen
         House  (1st  Floor), Dalhousie  Sq.,  Calcutta  . ij

1961-62
1961-62
1,49,648 i,32,C05 1,31,000 1,12,062
1245
1964-65
J3
Bhagawati  Prosad  Goenka,  9, Brabourne Road, Calcutta  . . . . . ..
1,51,806
Birendra  Nath  Mookherjec,  12,  Mission
1246
ij
Row, Calcutta  . . ..
1963-64 16,65,079
Brijkishore  Bhagat,  Karta  of  the H.U.F.  M/B
1247
Banshilal  Baijnath,  174, Chittaranjan  Avenue, Calcutta
HUF
1961-62 8,43,471
1248
Indl.
BrijlalLohiaandMohabir  Prosad  Khema,  Exe- cutor  of  the  Estate  Kanilal  Lohia  (DECD.) 1143 Chittaranjan  Avenue,  Calcutta
a
C.H.B. Walton,  C/o B. Shell, Calcutta  .
1249
1961-62 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1961-62
3,26,079 1,04,236 1,19,988 1,35,471 1,02,649
•j
C. K. Wadhwa, 16, Mangoe LBne> Calcutta C.M.A. Batherst, C/o  Shaw Wallace,  Co., Cal-
1250
1251
cutta
1966-67 2,00,005 D. A. Haugahton, C/o Shaw  Wallace  Co., Cal-
1252
cutta
1956-67 1965-66
1,77,063 1,15,211 D.  J.  Stredwick,  Shamsing,  Matell,  Jalpaiguri D. P. Agarwalla, 1, Netajee  Subha*  Road, Cal-
1253 125*
1961-62
,,
I,6"MO4 cutta
Decpchaud  Kankaria, 87, Dharamtala  St.,  Cal-
1255
J,
1961-62 1)13)794 cutta  . . . . . .. Debi Prosad  Goenka, 9, Brabourne  Road, Cal-
1256
>}
cutta
>}
>"
JJ
1964-65 1965-66 1961-62 1965-66
2)00,957 1,06,110 6,16,353 2,06,883 Dharsi LUadhar, 4B, Jackson  Lane, Calcutta  . Durga Froiad, 9, Jagmohan  Malik Lane, Calcutta Brie Haywwd,  Konnagar, Hooghly  . Erric  Jessop. C/o  Gcstetner  DupUcatCr,  Cal-
1257 1358 1359 1260
JJ
cutta
M
>J
F. A. Collect, C/o  Indo  Trading Co.,  Calcutta  . F.  G.  Liversedge,  C/o  Martin  Burn,  Calcutta  . F.  W. A. Lahmeyer,  C/o  Martin  Burn,  Calcutta
1963-64 1965-66 1964-65 1962-63
 
1,04,393 I,8J^79 2,79)534 1,16,000 1261 1262 1363

4282  T HE GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART  I I-
2
I
5
3
5
1264 G.  N. Makhanwalla,  12B,  Devi  Ghowdhury
Rpad,  Calcutta
Indl.
1965-66
.,
1,07,996 1,05,149 G,  W.  Springe,  13, Theatre  Road,  Calcutta  , Gayadin  Ram Kalwa, 8,  Rajindra  Deb Road,
1265 1266
Calcutta
j
n
33
1,95,860 1.21,575 i>6^,383
3>
1961-62 1965-66 1965-66
Ghanashyamdas,  Siliguri,  Darjeeling Giridharilal  Mehta, 4, Clive Row, Calcutta Guttaram  Lohia  Agarwalft,  3,  Mangoe  Lane,
1267 1268 1269
1961-62
1)
Calcutta  . . . . . ..
i,4S>889
H. Hollway, C/o Rempry&  Sons,  40/44, Stephen
1270
1,20,931
House,  Calcutta  . . . ..
1965-66
it
JJ
J,
,.
3,
J,
1965-66 1964-65 1964-65 1965-66 1962-63 1961-62
1,11,990 1,10,623 2,64,984 1,14,083 2,23,225 13,01,600 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276
H.  A. Fowler,  12, Govt.  Place  East,  Calcutta  . H.  K. Roy, C/o B. E. Lamp,  Calutta H.  P. Paul,  38, S. P. Mukherjee  Road,  Calcutta H.  P. Singh,  21, Old Court  House  St., Calcutta Haji  Abdul  Gotfar,  5, Amra Tola  St., Calcutta  . Haridas  Mundhra,  18, Loudon St., Calcutta  . Haribux  Gopiram,  12/2, Sevaram  Basak  St.,  Cal-
1277
HUF
cutta  . . . . . ..
IndL
R.39>939 1,24,912 2,81,920
3?
1961-62 1965-66 1965-66
Hiramal,  Siliguri,  Darjeeling  . . .. Hukumatmal,  Siliijuri,  Darjceling  . I. A. Brucster,  C/o  Shaw  Wallace,  Co., Cal-
1278 1279 1280
ji
1965-66
cutta
I.I7.596
i)
13
1962-63 1966-67 1965-66
1,12,450 i,92J4l8 1.40.529 I  D. Oberoi, P-17, Chowringhce  Road,  Calcutta I. M. Arnold  , C/o G. K. W., Calcutta  . Iswardas,  Siliguri, Darjeeling  . . .. Iswari  Prosad  Goenka,  9, Brabourne  Road,  Cal-
T2 8I *2"2 1283 1284
1964-65 1964-65 1966-67 1966-67
1,53,168 1,44,920 2,18,437 1.15.969 1285 1286 1287 1288
cutta  . . . . . .. J,  C. Harmal,  I.C.I.,  Chowringhee,  Calcutta J  J. Longlay,  C/o Gresham  & Craven,  Calcutta T.H.F.  Mamckshaw,  C/o LA. Co., Calcutta J. M. Mitra, 1, Ananda Kumar  Roy Chowdhury Lane,  Shibpur,  Howrah  (14B,  Gorachand Lane,  Calcutta)
1,00,600
i?
1964-65
J. S. Gregory,  Tower House, Chowringhee Sqr.,
1239
1965-66 1,18,019 Calcutta
j >
Jagamohan  Prosad  Goenka, 9,  Brabourne Road,
I29O
1964-65 1,78,192 Calcutta  . . . . . ..
Tagadippendra  L t. Col.  Maharaja, Narayan Bhup
1291
Bahadur, K.C.I.E., Coochbehar  .
1963-64 1,28,990
it
Jarriuna  Prosad  Goenka, 9,  Brabourne  Road,
2 92
Calcutta  . . . . . ..
j?
JJ
JJ
1964-65 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66
1,55,270 1,17,908; 1.20,375 1,44,243 Jethalal  Liladhar, 4B, Jackson  Lane,  Calcutta  . K.  Ray, 12, Chowringhee  Square,  Calcutta K.  Khaitan,  i B, Old Post  Office  St., Calcutta  . K.  B. Bose,  Receiver  in suite No. 53  of  1944,
1293
1294
1295
I29"
1,24,310
1964-65
JJ
10,  Old Post  Office  St., Calcutta  .
3J
"
-  JJ
1961-62 1963-64 1964-45 1965-66
5.355o"8 I>32,945 1^42,606 ij°7.695 K.D.  Ladsada, 45, Mod Seal St., Calcutta  . K.J. Sanghvi, 7, Swallow Lane,  Calcutta  . Kangumal, Siliguri,  Darjeeling Khemchand,  Siliguri, Darjeeling Kishori Prosad  Goenka,  19, Netajee  Subhas  Road,
1297
1298
1299
1300
I3OI
Calcutta
"
JJ
1964-65 1965-66
1,64,656 1^3,605 Kishenchand,  Siliguri,  Darjceling  . Smt. Krishna Devi Sureka,  172, J.N. Mukherjee  Road,
1302
1303
Salkia,  Howrah  .  .  .  .  ..
L.G.  Morris, C/o N.C.R. Co.  Calcutta
1304
1,03,912 1,14,224 1)32,544 1,15,224
 
1963-64 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65

Sic  3(11)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27, 1S89  4283
I
2
3
4
5
S/Shri
Indl.
>5
JJ
JJ
37
1964-65
1961-64
— d o-
—do—
—do—•
1,12,769
1,39.644
2,50,500
3)89,"5O
1,12,907
L.G.  Smithman, 29, Netajee  Subha" Rd., Cal. Lakhand Roy, 7/1, Grant  Lane, Calcutta M.L. Damtini, 62, Bentinok St., Cal. M.M.P. Desouza, 10, Madan St., Calcutta. M.V, Subramaniurn, 33, Chittaranjan  Avenue, Cal. Smt. Maya Chowdhury, 51, Ganesh Ch,  Avenue,
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1,03,078
—do—
Cal.
i)
1311
Mohi Singh,  Prop,  of  M/s  Indo  Trading  Co.,
1,27,650
—do—"
ji
P-29, Mission  Row  Extn. Calcutta
MonUal  Atta,  139,  Sivagopal  Banerjee  Lane,
1312
I,85,B22
JJ
Salkia, Howrah  . . . ..
1963-64
Murarilal  Karta  of  the  H.U.F.  Murarilal  Giri-
1313
I96I-62
dharilal, 61,  Strand  Road,  Calcutta
HUF
245,527
N.C.  Chatterjce,  P-514,  Raja  Basanta Roy  Rd,
1314
Cal.
Indl.
3t
is
1965-66
I96I-62
—do—•
1,45,620
2,27,002
1=04)977
1315
1316
1317
N.K. Bagaria, 3/1, Chowringhee  Square, Cal. Nathulal Sharma,  Hfndusthan  Building, Cal. Official  Trustee  West  Bengal  on  behalf  of  trust of  Mahara)adhiraja  Sir  Kamtswar  Singh Baha- dur of Dharbhanga  for the benefit  of  Maharani Rameswarlata  Saheba  (Annuity  income)  1, Heatings St., Calcutta.
1,02,968
1965-66
}>
1318
JJ
P.C.  Burkitt,  Manager  Tharbcoo  T.E., Dirjeeling  . . . . ..
3J
JJ
3)
JJ
1319
1320
1321
1322
P.E. John, Indo  Trading Co., Cal.  . P.L. Chowdhury, t2, Govt.  Place East, Cal. P.L. MuUick, 6, Old Post Office  St., Cal. P.N. Ban;rjee,  12, Mission  Row, Calcutta.
53
J3
1323
1324
P.P. Ginwala,  10, Wellesley Place, Cal. Parcshmall Kankaria, 87, Dharamtala  St. Cal.
1964-65
1965-66
1964-65
1961-62
1963-64
1964-65
1965-66
1963-64
I959-6O
1960-61
1961-62
1,22,549
1,02,361
1,38,684
1.53.345
4)34.257
4,07.377
5,i8,974
1,30,072
1,12,213
1,16,859
2,08,356
1325
1,80,234
jl
Pradip  Kr.  Roy & Smt. Gouribala  Roy, L/R of P.  K.  Roy  (Deed.),  7,  Akhoy  Mitra  Lane, Calcutta
1961-62
Purushottamdas  Monoharlal,  96,  Vlvekananda
1326
3J
Road, Calcutta.
—"do—1
1966-67
I,oo,000
1,25,764
RiA. Binns, C/o G.K.W.,  Cal. R.C. Dsb, Flat No. 10, Esplanade  Mansions,
1327
1328
1965-66
Cal
JJ
J)
i>
JJ
1963-64
—do—
1965-66
I,35"483 1,11484 1,26,633 1,78,643 Dr. R.E. Solberg, 3-A, Short  Street,  Cal. R.K.  Sen, 50/1, Beninandan St., Calcutta. Dr. R.M.S. Terry,  13, Theatre Road,  Calcutta. Ranadeb  Chowdhury,  34,  Ballygunge  Circular
I3"9
1330
1331
1332
)i
Road,  Calcutta.
)j
1962-63
1963-64
1961-62
148488
149,648
2.33)31(>
Robin  Mukherjee,  12, Mission Row, Cal. Mrs.  S.  Silverstone  C/o  Rompry  &  Sons,
1333
1334
1965-66
a
1,31,008
40/44, Stephen  House, Calcutta.  .
S.B.  Chowdhury,  71,  Jatindar  Mohan  Avenue,
1335
}i
Calcutta
1963-64
1964-65
1,84.725
1,32,842
a
jj
JJ
1.39,771
1,00490
3,91)002
2,13,170
jj
JJ
j?
1962-63
1964-65
1961-62
1965-66
1964-65
1961-62
—do—
I)53J547
1)53)194
3.09)839
S.C. Dutta,  175A, Dum Dura Road, Cal.  . S.G.  Fieldsonthan, B.O.C. (P.L.) S.G.  Mohatta, 19, British  Indian St., Cal.  . S.M.  Bose, 22/1, Ballygunge  Circular Rd.,  Cal. S.M.  Smith, C/o Shaw Wallace  Co., Cal.  . S.P. Jaiswal, 8B, Raiendra Deb Road,  Calcutta. S.S. Dhsnuka,  1, Chowringhee Sq., Cal.  . Sachindra  Nath  Chuudhuri,  10, Old Post  Office
1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 134a 1343
33
Street,  Calcutta
 
1954-65 3.17.922

4284  T**P  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART  I I-
I
2
3
4
5
S/Shri
Sk.  Md. Jan.  Khan  Bahadur,  78,  Collotolla
1344
St., Calcutta
1961-62
Indl.
2,15.532
Sailandra  Bhusan  Bakshi,  Extr.  to  the  estate
1345
of late Rajendra  Bhusan Bakshi  .  .  ,
1965-66 1,60,364
33
3j
if
3J
13
Jj
—do—. ~,do— [1961-62 1965-66 1961-62 1965-66
1,13,882 1,05,917 2,3°>733 2,50.276 1,22,059 1,58)677 J34<5 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352
33
1963-64 1,12,707 Sabya  Sachi Mukherjee,  4,  Gokhale Rd.,  Cal.  . Sangatmal,  Siliguri,  Darjeeling. Sangat  Singh, 22,  Ashutosh  Mukherjcc  Rd., Cal. Shew Progad Bagaria, 25A, Netaji  Subhas  Rd.,  Cal Shrilal Mohta,  61/2, Hariram  Goenka  St.,  Cal.  . Sidharatha  Sankar Roy, 2, BcltallaRd.,  Cal. Sova  Rani  Bhowmick,  L/R  of  S.C.  Bhowmick (D;^d.),  P-39S, Monoharpukur  Road,  Calcutta Smt.  Suchitra  Sen,  192/D,  Netaji  Subhaah  Rd.,
1353
Cal-40
1,27,674
33
J3
1961-62 —do— 1965-66
1,04,90s 1,08,097 1354 1355 1356
Sukumar  Mukherjcc,  40, Netaji  Subhas  Rd.,  Ca], T.E. Dompcr, B.O.C  (P.L.) Cal.  . T.L.  Martta  (Deed.), Through  Sri  S.K. Mullick, Executor  to  the  estate  C/o  Sandersons  & Morgan^,  5 & 7, Nctaji  Subhas Rd.,  Calcutta,
3J
1963-64 1964-65
13
33
33
!357 J358 '359 I360
1961-62 1966-67 —do— 1961-62
13,23,021 n.54.973 1,13,872 2,14,722 1,28,352 3,61,149 T.P. Chawraoia, 3/2, Madan St., Cal. W. Morris, C/o G.K.W.,  Calcutta W.K.  Foster, C/o I.T. Co., Cal.  . .. W.F. Depenning, 10, Govt. Place East,  Cal.
WEST  BENGAL—II
1961-62
)S
2,04,804
A.C. Manatab, Raj Kumar  of Burdwan.  . A.J.  Hormasji,  C/o  Turner,  Morrison  & Co.,
1361
1362
Ltd.,  6, Lyons Rani?c, Calcutta-1.
3S
1963-64
1.43,451
A.M.S.  Fergie, C/o M/s Love Lock  & Lewes, 4,
I3"3
Lyons Range,  Calcutta
3J
19S5-66
2,54)139
1364
A.N.  Mukhcrjee  & Bros.,  24,  Netaji  Subhas
1961-62
Road,  Calcutta
HUF
1,68,287
1365
3>O5,759
Indl.
- d o- Mrs.  A.  Ghosh,  C/o  Strand  Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,  67, Dr. Suresh  Sarkar Road,  CaL-14.  . Anand  Mohan  Bhuaan, Prof.,  General  Finance
1366
Corpn. 45, Dharamtollah  St., Cah-13.  .
J3
)5
1960-61 1965-66 1962-63
1,06,730 1,44,708 1,33.383 Arjun  Agarwalla,  7, Canning St.,  Cal. Ashruff  Mowjce,  46, Ezra  St., Cal. . Aslam  Manassch,  C/o Moran  & Co. Ltd.,
1367 136,8 I3
1,05,776
1961-62
C-5,  Clive Buildigs,  Cal-i
33
1?
3*
33
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
1,43,31? 1,05,128 1.59,25 r Atmaram  Paiia,  1, India Ex. Place,  Calcutta.  . B.M,  Lockhat,  146, Lower  Chitpur Rd., Cal.  . B.P. Mahttftvari, 9, Brabourne Rd.,  Cal. B.S.  Kamdar,  Prop,  of  Victor  Commercial,
1370 1371 1372 1373
11
44/45,  Ezra  St., Cal
SI
1961-62 ^-do—
1,01,809 1,49.17°' Benwarilal  Goel,  16, Canning  St.,  Cal. Banorilal  Rajgoria,  10/2, Saied  Salley  Lane,
1374 1375
Calcutta
HUF Irdl.
— do— —do— 1963-64
i  05,685 1,66,823 i,8B,5i6 Basan  Kr.  D"ga, A-3,  Glllander  Houee,  Cal. . Bimala  Ch. Law, 63, Radha  Bazar  St.,  Cal. C D.  Wil"on,  C/o. Balmer Lawrie & Co.,  21,
I37<5 1377 1378
1961-62
2,26095
Netaji  Subhas Rd., Cal.-i.
„
C,G.L,  Gamlen,  C/o  Bird  & Co., (P) Ltd.,
1779
1565-66
Chartered  Bank Bid.  Cal.-i.
1961-62
1,04,762
2,08,937
C.I.  Gandhi,  55/2, Canning St., Cal. C.P.  WalUs  C/o W.S.  Creswell  Co., Pr. Ltd.,
1380
1381
1965-66 1,20,084 3,  Clive Row,  Calcutta-1
 
"

I
2
5
3
4
S/Shrl1382
Chaitandas  Mundra,  C/o  M/s  Sri  Narsing
Electric  Store,  54, Ezra  St., Cal. .
Indl.
1961-62
1,34,807
 Champa  Kr.  Singhi  & Ora. 48, Gariahat R d .,
1383
CaL-19!
HUF
1963-64 1,08,751
C.  Valdcttaro,  C/o S.A.E.  (I) L t d ., 16 A & B,
1384
Indl.
St.  George  Terrace,  Calcutta-22
Jl
1961-62 __do —-do^
1,01,900 1,26,886 1,48,430 Chunilal  Pyne,  14, India  Ex. Place,  Cal.  . D.B.  Santhalia,  23/24,  Radha  Bazar  St., Cal.  . D.J.  Patterson,  C/o M /s Love  lock  &  Lewes,
1385 1386 1387
3}
4,  Lyons  Range,  Calcutta  . . ..
1965-66 2,44,508
D.L.V.  Rowe,  C/o Bird  & Co., P. L t d ,, Char-
1388
JJ
tered  Bank  Bldg.,  Calcutta
1962-63 1963-64
1,87,793 1,99,913
1389 D.R.  Watson,  C/o Sinclair  Murrary  & Co.,  P.
>J
Ltd.,  14, India  Exchange  Place,  Cal.-i1
1962-43 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66
2,37,38o 3,24,645 1,89,359 2,83,105 1,93,086
1390 D.  Fordwood,  C/o  Jardine  Henderson  L t d .,
11
4,  Clive Rovr,  Calcutta-i  . . ..
Jt
1961-62 ^-do—
1,05,158 1,16,609 D.  Mondal,  135 Canning  St., Cal.  . David  Mitchell,  C/o M /s Love  Lock  Lewes,
1391 1392
JJ
4,  Lyons  Range,  Cal.  . . ..
1,29,080
1963-64 1964-65
1,23,640
1965-66
J>
IJ ° 6J3 73 1393 1394
JJ
1,01,279 Lady  E .M. Drake,  2, Fairlie  Place,  Cal.  . E.R.  Boasc, C/o Lloyds  Bank  Ltd., 29, Nctaji Subhas  Road,  Cal.-I  . . ..
^09,793
1,11,904
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
1,00,397
1395
>J
E.  Ficrmeros,  C/o  Ganges  Printing  Ink  l'cy. Ltd.,  F - 3, Gillander  House,  8, Netaji  Subhas Road,  Cal.-I
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66
1^48,906 1^5,595 1,70,902 1,30,435
F.C.J.  Stewart,  C/o M/s Price  Watcrhouse  Peat
1396
1965-66
&  Co., Cal
1,74,986
F.G.  Massaian,  C/o Andrew  Vule & Co.,  L t d .,
1397
n
8,  Clive  Row, Calcutta-i  . . ..
1,02,140
1,10,905
1964-65 1965-66 1965-66
1,04,666
13
1961-62 1,81,121 Fani  Prasad  Singh,  59,  Canning  St.,  Cal. G.C.  Meheffey,  C/o  Union  Carbide  (I)  L t d .,
1398 1399
>3
1 & 3j Brabourne  Road,  Calcutta-1
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
1,30,997 1,50,102 I J 7 9 , 4I8
1961-62
J*
6,70,399 G.D.  Kothari,  15, India  Ex. Place  Cal.  . G.S.  Kidwell,  C/o Union  Carbide  (I)  L t d .,
1400 1401
1 & 3, Brabournc  Roud,  Cal,-i
1962-63 1963-64
1 J 50,359 h39>732 1,73,090 1,80,348
1964-65 1965-66 1965-66
I . " 6 J 9 35
1402
1961-62
it
1,56,341 Gurdevi  Talwar  &  Ors., Legal  heirs  of  Late BansiramTalwar,  571,  Block-N,  NewAlipore, Calcutta
H . F.  Whitehousc,  C/o Gladstone  LyaU  Jc  Co.
1403
1965-66
a
1,11,916
Ltd.,  4, Fairiie  Place,  Cal.-l  .  .

I
2
3
4
5
H.K.  Fitzgerald,  C/o  Balmer  Lawrie  &  Co.,
S/Shn 1404
Ltd.,  21, Netaji  Subhas Road,  Cal.-i  .
Indl.
1,26,087
IJ34,73I
1,44,720
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
H.K.S.  Lindsay,  C/o  Metal  Box  & Co.  of  (I)
I4°5
1961-62
1964-65
1.30,673
2,21,650-
1406
1407
Ltd.,  590, Chowringhee Rd., CaL-20  . H.L.  Malhotra,  iS, Netaji  Subhas Rd.,  Cal. H.  Ghosh,  (Deceased),  Thro:  Legal  Repre- sentative,  Mrs.  A.  Ghosh,  C/o  Standard Pharmaceuticals  Ltd.,  67, Dr.  Suresh  Sarkflr Rd., CaL-14
jj
1961-62
1961-62
2,15.554 1,15,603 Hiralal Sarcar, 2-T,  Cornfield  Rd.,  Cal.  . I.F.  Morriss,  C/o  Jardinc  Henderson  Ltd.,
1408
1409
4, Oive  Row, Cal.-i  . . ..
3?
r,02,79r 1,05,052
r,07,5ffi
1.05^87
yj
1959-60 1960-61 1961-63 1962-63 1953-64 1963-64 1,07,324 I.P. Sanon,  14/2, Old  China  Bazar  St.,  Cal, I.  Floistad,  C/o  Francis  Klein  &  Co..  Ltd.,
1410
1411
1, India  Exchange Place, Cal.-i  .
JJ
H
1,21,810 2,96,854 1,11,578
1961-62 1965-66 1961-62 Iqbal  Begum (Deci.)  72/1, Phears  Lane, Cal.  . J.A.  Brough,  C/o  National  &  Grindlays  Bank
1412 I4J3
Ltd., 29., Netaji  Subhas Rd.,  Cal.-I
JJ
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66 1961-62
1,26,969 1,27,809 1,14,640 I>°7J597 2,25,363 1414 I4J5
J.C. Bazu,  35 & 35C, Gorihahat  Rd.,  Cal. J.C.  Laing,  C/o  M/s  Love  Lock  &  Lewes,  4, Lyons Range, Calcutta  . . ..
2,28,786
"
1965-66
J.K.  Shafar,  C/o  Union  Carbide  (I)  Ltd.,i  & 3,
1416
Brabourne Rd., Cal.-i  . . ..
JJ
1417
J.M.  Herzog, C/o  Do.
M3r746
1,90,719.
i,93>i2i
1,90,470.
1,15,679
1,51,818
3*
1418
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1961-62 2,33,517 J. N.  Singh, P-16, New  C.  I. T.  Road,  Cal.  . J.N.C.Barnett,  C/o.  MetalBoxCo.(I)Ltd.,59C,
Chowringhee,  Calcutta-20  . . ..
it
1,00,301 1,02,220 1,03,595 1,05,007 2,41,286
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1961-62 J.  S. Cohan, Prop, of J.  S. Cohan & Co.  Calcutta J, S. F. GibbSj C/o M/s. Price, Waterhouse Peat
1420
1421
&  Co.  Calcutta  .  .  ,
S3
1965-66 2,51,132 J.  W.  Hutchinaon,  C/o Union  Carbide  (I)  Ltd.,
1422
1 & 3, Brabourne Road,  Calcutta-i
JJ
33
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1961-62
1,59,845 2,03,667 1,52,305 8,20,321 1423 1424
K.  C. Pal Chowdhury,  7, Ezra  Street,  Calcutta  . K.  J.  H.  Hurtley,  C/o  M/s.  Price,  Waterhousc Peat & Co., Ltd.  Calcutta  . . ..
J"
1965-66 1964-65
1,62,074 1,04,426 K.  K. Jajodia,  10, Clive Row,  Calcutta Kalyan  Kr. Dutta,  C/o  P.  C, Dutta & Co., 37,
1425 1426
3i
Netaji  Subhas  Road.,  Calcutta
}}
1961-62 1961-62
1,45,604 1,44,835 Kartick  Ch. Dutta, 69/4A, Hazra  Road,  Calcutta L. M. Thapar, C/o Karamchand Thapar& Bros.
1427 1428
1961-62
3,27,735 Pr. Ltd.,  25, Brabourne Road,  Calcutta-i L.  R.  Patel,  C/o  William  Jacks & Co., P.  Ltd.,
1429
16, Netaji  Subhas  Road,  Calcutta-1
11
M.  C. P.  C. Yuthok,  55/2, Canning  Street, Cal. M" M. Loyalka,  1, India  Ex. Place,  Calcutta
it
1430 1431
1961-62 1964-65 1962-63
 
I,73,i65 1,00,014 1,34.^5

1
2
3
5
4
S/Shri
M. M. Thapar, C/o Karamchand Thapar& Bros.
1432
Indl. Indl.
1963-64
1965-66
1.99*703
3,85,918
Pr. Ltd., 25, Brabourne  Road,  Calcutta-1
M.  P. Birla,  18, Gurusday  Road,  Calcutta
Manika  Burman,  18, Netaji  Subhag  Road,
1433
1434
Calcutta  ,
 
. . ..
Indl.
1962-63
1963-64
1961-62
6,68,740
3.35.281
1,81,120
Indl.
Moni  Prasad  Singh,  59, Canning  Street,  Calcutta
Moti  Singh Tank, 9A, Hasi Mohasin Road,
*435 1436
Calcutta
Indl.
N.  R.  Bancrjee,  C/o  Guest  Keen,  Williams
1437
(Sankey Divn.),  17, Brobournc Road,  Calcutta-i
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1965-66
1,27,259
i,O4,755
1,07,440
1,23,139
Indl. Indl.
NagardasLShah,  44/4 5, Ezra  Street, Calcutta  .
Nandalal  Tanthia,  1 & 2 Old  Post  Office  Street
U38 1439
Calcutta
1961-62
1961-62
1961-62
1,21,166
1,14,246
2,19*465
Indl.
Nandalal  Sur, 58/4, Christopher  Road,  Calcutta
Indl.
Nani  Gopal  Sur, 58/4, Christopher  Road,  Calcutta  Indl.
O. T.  Jenkins,  C/o Balmer  Lawrie & Co. Ltd.,
1440
1441
1442
21,  Netaji  Subhas  Road,  Calcutta-i
Indl.
Indl.
1961-62
1961-62
1.59.952
3,293"45
1443
1444
P.  C. Shyarn  I, Pretoria  Street,  Calcutta  . P.  N i y o g i,  C /o M / s.  L o ve  L o ck  &  L e w e s,  4, L y o ns  R a n g e,  C a l c u t ta  . . ..
2,06,370
I,I3>7I5
1965-66
1965-66
Indl. Indl.
Prabhudas J. Shah, 44/45,  Ezra  Street,  Calcutta
Pran  Prosad, C/o Bird & Co. P. Ltd., Chartered
*445 1446
Indl.
Bank Building,  Calcutta-1.
1962-63
1963-64
1,12,433
1,07.963
Priyambada  Devi  Birla,  18,  Gurusaday  Road,
*497
Indl.
Calcutta
1964-65
1965-66
1964-65
2,22,275
2,46.235
1,16,380
Indl.
Provasankar  Joshi, 33, Canning  Street,  Calcutta
R.  C.  Bodden,  C/o  Union  Carbide  (I) Ltd.,
1448
1449
1 & 3 Brabourne  Road,  Calcutta-1
Indl.
1962-63
1963-64
1961-62
1964-65
1,43,069
1,67,301
2,19,944
2,27,528
1450
1451
1452
1,32,260
1965-66
Indl.
R.  K. Dutta, 7, Lyons  Range,  Calcutta  . Indl. R.  K. Malhorta,  18, Netaji  Subhas  Road,  Calcutta  Indl. R. N.  Sen, C/o M/s. Price, Waterhouse Peat & Co., D-4, Gillandcr  House, Calcutta  . R.  N.  Adams,  C/o  Andrew  Yule  &  Co.  Ltd.,  8,
1453
Clive  Row,  Calcutta-1  . . ..
Indl.
1,15,034
1,06,595
1,16,421
1964-65
1965-66
1965-66
1454
Indl.
R. P. Bcnthol, C/o Bird& Co. P. Ltd., Chartered
Bank  Building,  Calcutta-1  . . ..
1965-66
1961-62
1961-62
1,06,668
2,19,445
4,81,620
1453
1456
1457
Rabindra  N.Sur,  58/4,  Christopher  Road,  Calcutta  Indl.
Indl.
S.  G.  Bose,  22,  Canning  Street,  Calcutta  .
S. K.  Ganguly,  C/o M/s. Love Lock & Lewes, 4,
Lyons  Range,  Calcutta  . . ..
1965-66
1964-65
1,15.798
1,96,572
Indl. Indl.
S.  N.  Malhotra,  18, Nctaji  Subhas  Rd.,  Calcutta
S.  N.  Beri,  C/o  Sutna  Stone  & Line  Co.  Ltd.,
1458
1459
6,  Middle  Road,  Calcutta-22
Indl. Indl.
1965-66
1961-62
1,15,211
2,31,597
Sankarlal  Pasari,  16,  India  Ex.  Place,  Calcutta  .
Smt.  Sarala  Bhartiya,  18,  Suren  Tagore  Road,
1460
1461
Indl.
Calcutta
1956-57
inc ;  Satya  Ch.  Law,  63, Radha  Bazar  Street,  Calcutta  Indl.
1462
1962-63
1963-64
20,45,429 :ludein  C.G. i,58>497 1,52,282 Subhkaran  Chowohoria,  I2/IB,  Lindsay  Street,
1463
Indl.
1947-48
Calcutta
3,64,107
p  Sukumar  Bancrjee,  Prop.  Howrah  Trading  Co.,
1464
29,  Nctaji  Subhas  Road,  Calcutta
1961-62
1961-62
2,17,287
1,38,206
146;
146*
146"
146!
Indl.
;  T.  C.  Narottomdas,  55,  Canning  Street,  Calcutta  [ Indl.
i  Estate  of Thakurani  Tagatjananl,  25/A,  Swallow
Lane,  Calcutta, Jt. receiver—Amaieshwar  Sha
Samarendra  Shaw.  . . . .. Indl.
r  Smt.  Tribeni  Devi,  25-A,  Theatre  Road,  Calcutta  JIndl.
S  V.  K.  Bansal,  20/1, Lall  Bazar  Street,  Calcutta [Indl.
1961-62
1961-62
1961-62
1,10,476
1.55.163
1,66,402

1
2
3
4
5
S/ShnV.  K.  Mmieta,  14/2, Old  China  Bazar  Street,
1469
Calcutta  •
Indl.
 1.76,738 1)44.994 2,07,105 1,18,272
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
V.  P.  Mslhotra  18, Netaji  Subhaa  Raod,  Calcutta Indl. V, V.  Parikh,  11, R.  N.  Aiutticrjee  Road,  Calcutta  Indl. V.  Smtezer,  C/o  Frends  Klein  &  Co.  Ltd.,  1,
1470 1471 1472
India  Exchange  Place,  Calcutta-1
Indl.
1961-62 1964-65 1965-66
1,12,906
i>37>29i
1,23,262
W.  F.  Maclellan,  C/o  MacneM  &  Barry  Ltd.,
1473
2,  Fairlie  Place, Calcutta-1  .  .  .
Indl.
Yusuflf  M^wjce,  46, Ezra  Street,  Calcutta.
Indl.
1,14.760 1,21,000 1,33.384
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
1474 WEST BENGAL—III
A.P.  T±vor,  Co  M's  Sinclair  & Co.,  7,  Welle-
I47S
1965-66 1961-62 1961-452
3.60,791 2,11,149 1.92,033
Indl Indl Indl.
slcy Place,  Cal.  .  .  .  ,. Adhiram  Mullick,  129 Cornawallis  St., Cal. B.  Nsgchowdhury,  28 Hari  Ghosh  St., Cal. B. J. Ajmora,  C/o.  Cardboard  Box Mfg.  Co.,
1476 1477 1478
38,  Colootola  St., Cal
1,10,089
1963-64 1961-62
Indl. Indl.
I,35I74O
B.K.  Gencrlwalla,  119A, Harrison  Rd., Cal. B. P.  Hirandandani,  72/73  Old China  Bazar
1479
1480
Street,  Calcutta
1,34.309
1,52,141
1962-63
Indl. Indl.
Balbir  Singh,  78, Amhcrst  St.,  Cal. Bsnarashilal  Goenka, 208, Jamunalal Bajaj  St.,
1481
1482
         Calcutta.                                       Indl.           1960-61      1,01,894
1483  B:noy  Kr,  M'niumdar,  9, Give Row, Cal.          Indl.           i96r-62      3,61,297
1484  Bhagawati Pd. Surekha, 72, Old, China  Bazar  St.,
         Cal.                                            Indl.             Do.

1,27,500
Bijoynarayan  Shaw & Ors. L/R  Bhagwati Pd.  .
1485
Shah (Did.)  71, NitajiSubhas  Rd., Cal.  . Indl.  •
Do.
1,62,491
Blmal Cti. Shyamahkha, C/o Indian  Silk House,
i486
Tower Block ,  College St.  Market,  Cal.
1963-64 1961-62
1.05,583 1,34,844
Indl. Indl.
Biswaranjan  Basak 74 Bcadon  St., Cal.  . C. L. Bahri & Sons , 36, Rajarain  Roy  Chowdhury
1487
1488
Ghat Road,  Howrah  . . ..
Do 1965-66 1961-62
1,07,313 1.04,273 3,18,356
HUF Indl. H UF
1489
1490
1491
Dalpatlal Hiralal, 19. Amratalla  St., Cal. Diluram  Arjundas,  13, Rupchand  Ray St., Cal. Dioraj  Gaulochha, Karta  of the H.U.  F.  Dcora) Gaulecha) & Ors., 11, Watklns Lane, Howrah
1960-61 1963-64
1,16,303 1,28,339
2,10,161
Do. 1961-62
H UF Indl. Indl. Indl.
i.39>"5 Diokinandan  Bagaria,  Strand Road,  Cal. Smt. Dhanra)  Bavaria, 46, Strand  Rd., Cal. Smt.  DhanwatiD^vi Vald, 55. Canning  St., Cal. Smt.  Durga Devi Podder, L/R  of late B. K.  Podder,
1492 1493 1494 1495
5, Queen Park,  Calcutta
"Do. 1963-64
Indl. Indl.
1.47,083
1.17.527
Dutta, Dibakar,  18, Subarbon  Rd.,  Howrah. Dwarka Pd. Goenka, 208, Jammalal Bajaj  St.,
1496 1497
Cal
Indl.
r,i2,8o3
1960-61
Dwarkaram  Shaw,  123/2,  Upper  Circular  Rd.,
1498
Cal.
Indl.
1961-62
1.05,577
Executor to the Estate  of Sir Edwar Bcnthal 29,
1499
Netaji  SubhashRd.,  Cal
Indl.
1965-66 4,n>i59
Gangaprosad  Sowsankarlal,  12/1, Ghosh  Lane,
1500
Calcutta.
2,24,189 1,05,105 1,24,995 1,38,326 2.95,809
H UF Indl. Indl. Indl. Indl.
1961-62 Do. Do. Do. Do.
Smt.  Gauti Devi Mohar, Howrah.  . Smt.  Gojavari Devi Vaid, 55, Canning St.,  Cal. Haripada Sarkar, 125A,  Bowbazar St.,  Cal. Jagadish Ch.  Sinha. 64 Belgachia Rd.,  Cal. Jogmohan Prasad Goenka &  Ors.  145, Mukta-
ram  Babu St., Calcutta
1962-63 1961-62
1,27,349 1,19,786
HUF Indl.
Kashi Pd.  Baja),  71, Burtolla, Lane, Calcutta,  . Kirorimull  (Scth) & Co., 8A, Kashi Ghosh Lane,
Calcutta.
1,09,206
1964-65
Indl.
LalchandBohri & Sons, 36, Rujnaraln Roy —
1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 M 1506 1507 • -• 1508
Chowdhury Ghat Road, Howtah..
1961-62
HUF
 
L59.756

2
I
3
4
5
.1509  Lakshimoycc Sen, Dohson Lane, Howrah,            Indl.            1961-62       I>35>459
1510   LaxmiDeviToddi,  193/2, M.G.  Road, Cal.                           x957-58      2,71,205
 1511  Smt. Lila Devi Mohansaria, 34, Vivekananda     .
         Rd.,  Cal                                                        1961-62      1)54=929
 1512  M.P.  Jaiswal,  99, G. T. Road , Howrah. .          ?>            D o.          1,34,186
1513   Maksudandas Chowdhury, 46, Cotton St.,  Cal.       > J             Do.          1.19)519
       Madanlal Khandelwal,  5, Amratolla St.,  Cal.  .    >>             Do.          1)19)307
^5HJ5i5 Mathura Prasad Rajghoria                         HUF              Do.          2,55,548
 3516  Moniharsha Jyoti, P-11, New  Howrah  Bridge
        Rd.,Cal                                         Indl.            Do.           2,75)518
 1517  N. K. Brahmaehari 19 Lowden St.,  Cal.  .                          Do.           1,77,984
 1518J Nandalal Kothari, C/o Cardboard Box  Mfg.  Co.,
      1  38, Colootola St., Cal                                           1963-64
                                                           JJ                          1,58,042
3519   Nankcylal Chowdhury, 46, Cotton St.,  Cal.           )?            1961-62       1,20,187
3520   Narendranath Singh, 78, AmherSt St.,  Cal.           >1            1962-63       1,52,142
 1521  Naresh Ch. Ghosh , J2, Beadon St., Cal.              3i            1961-62       I,n,06l
 3522  Nathmal Agarwalla (Jalan), Cal.                                    Do.          1,24,217
 1523  P.H. William ion (D^cd.)  C/o M/s. Love lock &
       Lewis, 4, LvJns  Ringe,  Calcutta                                  1965-66      3,24,908
1524   P. N. Brahmachari,  19, Lowden  St., Cal.            JJ             1961-62      r)83,43°
 J525  P. N. Chitterjec,  137, Cinning  St.,  Cal.  .       JJ          • Do.           1,00,690
 1526  P. P, Fogla, 3, Chittaranjau  Avenue, Cal. .         J>            Do.          2,86,731
 1527  P. V. Midvani,  14,  Nurmfl  Lohia Lane, Cal.        JJ            Do. •        2,08,190
 1528  Pan;hk-iri D is,  135, Nitaji  S ubhas Rd.,  Cal.    >J            1964-56       1,00,181
 1529  Panmal  Sethia,  Cal.  .    .     .    ..            >j            1951-62       1,47,918
 J53°  Parame^war  Prosad  Jaiswal,  8,  Cornwillis St.,
                                                             J^           Do.

2,69,620
Calcutta
ft
11
Do. Do. '  D J.
r,34,797 r, 03,040 1,91,802 Patnaik & Co., 12, New Sil Lane, Howrah  . PhoolChand  Shaw,  192, Vivekananda Rd., Cal, Prokishbati G^mbhir,  28/1, Dobson  Rd.,  Howrah R.  A. V. Prendirgas, C/o M/s.  Sinclair  &  Co.,
1531 1532 "533 *534
7,
is
1955-66
Wcllesley  Place,  Cal
1,89,333
R. B. Gupta  & Ors. L/R of T. N. Ghosh,
*535
67B, Netaii Subhas  Rd., Cal.
HUF Indl.
it
1961-63 Do. Do.
1, 32, 778 1,34,186 i,44,72P R. S. Jaiswal, 99. G. R. Road,  Howrah Smt.  Radha  Devi Vaid,  55, Cinning  St., Cal. Rajetidra  Kr.  Dutta,  71A, Nctaji  Subhas  Rd.,
1536 153 7 1538
Calcutta
H
Do. 1962-63
1,89,292 i,3I.I54 RamJeoji  Poddar,  133, G. T. Roid  (S), Howrah Ramjopal  Asarwalla,  Alice  Gancriwala, 119A,
1539 X54o
1961-62
3)
JJ
it
Do. Do. Do D o.
1,14,028 9,82,983 2,69,620 1,45,927 1,19,700
*
Hirrison  Road,  Calcutta  . . .. Rimprosad  Shaw, 6/r, Sankar  Lane, Calcutta Ramcwar Prosad Jaiswal, 8, Cornw,Ulis St.,  Cal. R n?  Djvi  Vjid,  55, Cinning  St., Cal. S. C  Gh^al,  103. By'alpara  Lane, Hiwrah S. M. Aihraf, Prop,  of M/s.  Hind  Rubber  Works
1541 1542 *543 1544 "54S
Do.
3,08,5Z2 17, BibiBagan  Lane,  Calcutta
Do.
t546
Do
1,72,317 1,49,198 S. N. K"ian, 63, Netaji  Subhas Rd.,  Calcutta S. N. Sen,  18/1, Sivnarayan  Das Lane,  Calcutta SaiilU  Mihra,  C/o Central  Textile  Mill) 149,
<547 1548
1961-62
Hirrison  RI., Calcutta
1,29, "6
'549
Do.
1,08,201
Mrs.  Sakina A. Gani, Victor House, Park St., Calcutta  . . . . . ..
Snyamrayan  Prosad,  Karta,  M/s.  Gobardhan
1550
HUF Indl.
Do. Do.
U
>f
£°-Do.
I5SI 1552 1553 1554
Ramtarak, 8, Cornwallis  St.,  Calcutta Satyanarayan  Proaad Jaiswgl,  Calcutta. Shew Prosad Jaiswal, 8,  Cornwailis  St., Cal. Smt.  Shova Devi Vaid, 55, Canning St., Cal. Sitaram Agarwalla, Cal
Do.
 
10,^8,505 3,78,619 3,69,619 i,36,"8 J2,80,200

I
2
3
4
5
Sk. Abdul Haraid  (Deed,), Through  Administra-
1555
tor, aA, Kilishomc  St., Cal.
Indl.
I  71.170
1961-62
3  / - ^ j j /y
1556
Sova  Kanta Jha, Prop. Pioneer Watch  Co., 318A,
Da.
Chittaranjan  Avenue,  Calcutta  ,
1,18,122
Srikiisotviaa  Agarwalla,  23,  Girarihita  Road,
1557
,3
Calcutta  .
Do.
3,13,376
1558
Subol  Ch,  Paul,  Chandi  Charan  Paul & Nctai Charan  Paul  Executors  to  the  citate  of Harimohan  Paul, 92A, Sovabazar, Cal.
5,
1,01,009-
33
Do. Do.
1,11,725
Sudhir  Champ ite,  169, Vivekananda Rd., Cal. Miss,  auman  sangal L./o  M/S,  W. ovens  &  Co.
1559
1560
1965-66
1,29,324
Ltd.,  4,  Dalhousie  Sq.,  Cal,
Sundari  Surti  Stores,  5,  Upper  Chitpur  Rd.,
1561
Calcutta  .
„ HUF
1961-62 Do.
i3io,5O5:
2,09,666-
Surendra  N.  Sarkar & Ora., Cal. Syed  Javer  Ali Fatehali,  Prop,  of  Suratce  To-
1562 1563
Indl.
I  
bacco Co., 3/5, Rajmohum  St.,  Calcutta Tilak  Raj  Kapoor, 4, Cossiporc Rd.,  Cal.  .
Do. Do.
1564
1 , 9 2 , 2 39
Tolaram  Agarwalla,  Prop.  Tolaram  Shyam-
1565
sundar,  67/19,  Strand  Road,  Cal.
Do.
1,34,667
B.  L.  J"Un,  8,  Dalhousie  Square  East,
1566
Calcutta.
,  .
Do.
A  CiA  ifiM. 4 3U4 J / °^ B. V. Jacob, 1 & 2,  Old Court House Corner,
13
Calcutta
Do.
33
2300,533.
Binwanath  Bhuwalka,  178,  Mahatma  Gandhi
1568
Road, Cal.  . . ..
,3
Do.
1,04,745
Champalal  Baid,  2,  Raja  Woodmund  St.,
1 <69
Cal.
. . . . ..
Do.
8,28,102
„
D.  N.  Jalan,  8,  Dalhousie  Square  East,
157°
Calcutta
S!
Do.
11,23,786
Smt.  Easwarma  Mitra,  Prop.  Orissa Agents,
1571
J)
Cuttack  ,
1962-63
1963-64
1,02,027 6,98,5*4
Ghanashyamdaj  Binani,  38,  Strand  Rd.,
1572
3,
Calcutta
Do.
6,14,646
Smt.  Gini  Devi,  34,  New  Road,  Alipur,
1573
Calcutta
JJ
1965-66
IJ52,549
Hardutrai  Motllal  Chamaria,  60/2,  Lake  Rd.,
1574
,3
1963-64
Cal.  .
I375>i33
Harilal  Guha,  183/4,  Prince  Anwar  Sah  Rd.,
1575
,,
1961-62
1,56,667
Cal
1576
3)
Tanab  Md.  Serajuddin,  P-i63  Bcntick  S t, Cal.  . . . . . ..
Do.
1  3*353143
Jit Pal, C/o M/s, Aminchand Pyarelal, 135, Cann-
1577
ing  St., Cal
>}
Do.
3647,802
Jogendar  Singh  Atwal, Atwal  Nagar,  Assan-
1578
BOl.
, . . . . . _.
6,o6"7o<>
Do.
1579
Joginder  Singh  Atwal Heir & legal  Representa- tive  of  G.  S.  Atwal  (Deed.)  Atwal  Nagar, Assansol.
,1
Do.
1,20,990
K.  L.  Jalan,  8,  Dalhousie  Square,  East.  Cal-
1580
cutta                                                    3,            Do.
                                                         3,           Do.
                                                         33            Do.

3,80,390
9,373643-
I3303925
1581
1582
1583
3*
J3
3,
Do. Do. Do.
2,30,264 i>43,888 1,43,888 M.  L. Jalan, 8, Dalhousie Square East, Calcutta Manmull  Bhuwalaka,  178,  M.G.  Road,  Cal. Matadin  Khaitan,  9,  Ramkumar  Rakshit Lane, Cal.  . . . . .. Md. Ekramul Haque, P-16, Bentick. St., Cal. Md.  Mazharul Haque,  P-16, Bentick  St., Cal. Md.  Habibur  Rahman,  73A,  Ganesh  Ch.
158A 1585 1586
Avenue, Calcutta
Do.
U
2,05,631
1587
Md.  Khalilur  Rahman & Ore.,  Legal  heirs & Representatives  of  Md. Samsuddin(Decd.) P-i6,Bentick  St.,  Calcutta.
"J
Do.
1,02,278:

2
t
3
4
5
S/Shii
Indl.
1961-62
1588   Muaraf  Hussain  Nawab 6, Rowdon  St.,  Cal.
1589   N.K. Jalan, 8j Dalhousie  Square, East Cal.                        do:
1590   Narcsh  Kumar  Agarwalla, 4, Lyons Range, Cal.        9*           do.
1591   Nathmall Khaitan, 34, Baranshi Ghosh  St., Cal.       it
1592   P.B. Bajoria,  3, Netafi  Subhas Rd.,  Cal.  .        3J
1593   Pannalal Saraogi, 4, Theatre Rd.,  Cal.
1594   R.K. Birla,  15, India  Exchange Place                "

iji4>437
3)93)155
1,12,045
1,36,092
5>O4.I93
1,36,910
1.21,351
1,23,192
1965-66 1961-62 do. 1962-63 1963-64
1595
1,40,013
ij87,593
1961-62 do.
1596
1597
Rajcndra  Gupta,  195/1, Mahatma  Gandhi  Rd.,
  Cal.            .    .    .    .    .    ..
Ramkumar  Amu-walla, A,  Lyons Range, Cal.
Ranjit  Singh  Sethia, 38, Baranasi  Ghoih  St.,
   Cal.           •    •    -     .    .   ..                         do.          1,07,256
                                                    HUF              do.           1,50,257
                                                    Indl.             do.          3,72,347

1598
1599
1600
Ratanlal Chamaria, 3, Chandmari  Rd.  Cai S.B. Jalan, 8, Dalhousie  Square, East.  Calcutta S.C.  Laul,  C/o  Grand  Smithy Works,  1, GirlBh Ghose Road, Howrah.  . . ..
2,52449 8,83,605
,,
do. do. do.
3)
1601
1602
1603
,,
34,46,247
do.
S.P.  Jain  11, Clive Row, Cal. Satyanarayan  Agarwalla, 7A, CUve Row, Cal.  . Satya Pal, C/o  M/s  Aminchand  Pyarelal 135, Canning  St.,  Calcutta  . . .. Shvi Kumar  Bhuwalka,  178, Mahatma  Gandhi
1604
Rd.,  Cal.
Indl.
1961-62
1,30,862
I,i4ji66-
do.
Late  Shyamlal  Bhuwalka,  do. Smt.  Shanti Devi Jalan & Ors. 8 Dalhousie  Squa
" r, East
1605
1606
HUF Indl.
do do.
3,67)080
7,19,520
Cal.  . . . . . .. Sobanlal  Sethia, 38, Baranasi Ghosh  St.,  Cal. Surcnder  Pal,  C/o  M/s  Aminchand  Pyarelal  135
1607
1608
)
Canning  St.,  Cal
34,20,764
5,63,229-
do. do.
•  JJ
Surinder  Singh Atwal, Atwal Nagar, AssanBol Swaraj  Pal, C/o  M/s  Aminchnad  Pyarelal  135,
1609
1610
Canning  St., Cal
if
1611
T.C.  Saboo,  15, India Exchange Place
do. 1963-64 1964-65
34.51)770
14)1)391
1,72,491
1612
JJ
1.32,657
1961-62
V.  R.  Kalia,  legal  rep:  of  Sm.  S.  Barkl,  12, Circus Avenue, Cal.  . . . ..
II  NAMES OF ALL FIRMS, ASSOCIATION OF  PERSONS AND COMPANIES  ASSESSED
ON  INCOME  OF  OVER  Rs.  10 LAKHS  IN  THE  FINANCIAL  YEAR  1965-66.
Name & Address of the asacssee.
Status
SI. No.
Assessment Year
Income assessed under  I.T. Act  196B
2
1
3
5
4
ANDHRA PRADESH  . . . ..
1 Andhra Pradesh  State  Road  Transport  Corpora-
tion, Hyderabad.  . . . ..
Co.
„
3,
,)
1961-62 1963-64 1965-66 1965-66 1962-63
38,27,865 15,57,33* 32,47,279 11,95,660 43,70,84c- Andhra Cement  Company, Vijayawada.  , Andhra Sugar Limited, Tanuku, W. G. Dist.  . Indian Detonators Ltd., Sanatnagar,  Hyderabad. K. C. P. Limited, Vuyyur, Krishna  District. Ramdas  Motor  Transport  Private  Limited,
2 3 4 5 6
Kakinada.
„
Vizir Sultan Tobacco Co., Limited,  Hyderabad.
7
1965-66 1964-65 1965-66
 
10,35,758 1,26,61,593 1,42,41,985

I
2
3
4
5
BIHAR  &ORISSA
8 LiiUa  C}pp>r Corporation  Limited, Ghitsila.  .
1962-63 1,52,23,645
Co.
BOMBAY  CITY—I
A.  F.  Ferguson  & Co., Allahabad  Bapk  Building
9
Bombay.  .  .  ,  .  . ..
16,54,893
1965-66
Firm
10
20,47,336
Co.
1964-65
II
Abbott  Lab.  India  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Jchangir  Building, M. G. Roadj Bombay-i,  ,  . .. Alluminium  Ltd.,  9/0  Price  Water  House  Peast
1965-66
68,41,770 Co., Calcutta.  .  '  ,
12
American  Cyanamid  &  Co.,  c/o  M/s.  A.F.
JJ
Ferguson & Co., Bombay
1962-63 1964-65 1965-66
18,65,728 29,83,058 20)73.238
13
JJ
1965-66
41,06,931 Ambika  Silk  Mills  P.  Ltd.,  11-12  Hainsc  Road, Bombay.  .  . . . .. Andhra  Valley  Power  Supply  Co.  Ltd.,  Bombay
14
67,40,481
1964-65
J)
House, Bruce Street, Fort, Bombay.  .
Anglo  French  Drug  Co.  (Eastern)  Pvt.  Ltd.,
15
ii
Tardeo, Bombay.  . . . ..
1964-65 1965-66
13,45,201 17*95,558
16 Anil,  Hardboards  Ltd.,  Laxmi  Insurance
Building,  Sir P. M. Rd.,  Bombay.  .
1964-65
19,43.753
Art  Leather  Pvt.  Ltd.,  16  Appolo  Street,  Fort,
"7
it
18,14,397
1964-65
Bombay
i3
Ardeshir B. Cursetji & Sons Pvt. Ltd., 6 Rampart
1965-66
25,88,664
Row, Fort, Bombay
Assam  Mitch  Co.  Ltd".,  Mercantile  Chambers,
*9
1965-66
is
Fort, Bombay.  . . . . ..
I5>7959OS
30
Avery Ltd., Price Water  Hrmse Peat & Company,
10,04,000
1965-66
1>
Calcutta
21
11,38,025
19&1-62
JJ
B.  R.  Hermann  &  Mohatta  (India)  Pvt.  Ltd., Mustaffa  Building, S ir P.M. Road, Bombay.  .
22 Bajaj  Elcctricals Ltd., 45-47 Veer Nariman  Road,
29,69,096
1963-64
JJ
Bombay
Bharat  Bijlce  Ltd.,  Udyong  Nagar  Kings circle,
33
11,62,733
JJ
1965-66
SionBombay
Bipin  Silk  Mills  P.  Ltd.,  12 Dadar  Road,  Bom-
24
16,70,021
35
bay-28
1965-66
Blue  Star  Engineering  Co.,  (P)  Ltd.,  Kasturi
35
JJ
Building, J. T. Road, Bombay-1.
13,62,271
12,87,932
1964-65 1965-66
26 Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., Neville House,
48,96,202
Bollard Estate, Bombay.  . . ..
i>
1963-64
Bombay  Suburban  Electricity  Co.,  Pvt.  Ltd.,
27
30,87,425
1965-66
5 Graham Road, Bombay
38
ii
Boots  Pure  Drug  Co.,  (India)  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Asian Building,  17 Nicol Road, Ballard Estate, Bom- bay.  . . . . . ..
1964-65
24,34,579
Brady & Morris Engg.  Co.  Ltd.,  Brady  House,
29
10,03,980
        Fort, Bombay-r.                                     a          1965-66
3°   British  Oxygen  Co. Ltd.,  c/o  Price Water  House
       Calcutta                                             a           1965-66         37,81,450
3i   Burmah  Shell  Refineries  (I)  Ltd.,  Post  Box  No.

1960-61
5,98,19.938
"
1725, Bombay-1.
Chesebrough Pond's  (Inc.),  13,  Gunbo  Street
33
20,60,277
1965-66
Fort, Bombay-i.
Coorla  Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd.,  Udyog, Bhavan,
33
11,70,269
1964-65
j>
Wittet Road, Ballard Estate, Bombay.  .
Cotton  Agents  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Industrial  Assurance
34
18,45,522
1965-66
Bldg., Fort, Bombay.

SFC.  3(11)]  THE GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/SARTIKA  27, 1889  4 3 95
I
2
5
4
Colour  Chem  Ltd.,  221  Dr. D, N. Road,  Fort,
35'
Bombay-i.
Co.
04,36,909 14,40,018' 60,03,554
1062-63 1963-64 1964-65
36 Daimler Beii7 A. G. Bombay House, Bruce  Street,
Fort  Bombay.
?j
3i,66,24r 33,43,010
1963-64 1964-65 1963-64
I7i99>94°' 37 38
"
Door Oliver (I) Ltd.,  16 Queens Road, Bombay-i. English  Card  Clorhinn  Co.  Ltd.  c/o A.V,  Fer- guson & Co., A.Cs. Fort, Bombay.  ;  ,
1962-63 1964-65
11,89,450' 10,66,550-
Esso  Standard  Refineries  Co. of India  Ltd., 17,
39
Jamshedji  Tata Road,  Hombay-i.
1960-61 2,46,00,375
40 Ganalbhai  Jute  Mills  Ltd.,  Mafat  Lai  House,
,,
Fort, Bombay.  . . . . ..
12,50,772-
1965-66
Gill &  Company  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Indu  House,  Bollard
41
Estate, Bombav.  . . . ..
3,
1965-66
10,31,091
42 GIHXO  Groups  Ltd., Dr, Annie  Bcsent  Road,
Worli, Bombay.
3}
75,00,00c-
1965-66
43 Glaxo Lab. Ltd.,  U. K, Dr. Annie Bcsent  Road, Worli, Bombay.  . . . , ";
SS
34.75,099- 27,76,426 30,03,993
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
it
1962-63 3,46,67,133 Glaxo Lab. (I) Pvt. Ltd.,  — D o .- Godrej Soaps Pvt. Ltd., Eastern Express Highway
44 45
Vikhroji, Bombay 79 N.B
J.
31
1964-65 1962-63
18,31,603- 88,30,635 46 47
Godrej&BoyccMfg.  Co.,Lai  baghPare].Bombay-12 Goodlas Wall and  Lead Industries Ltd., c/o Price Water House, Peat & Co., B-4  Gillander House Calcutta.  ;
1961-62
17,26 373'
3.
10,27,662
1964-65
Greaves Fozcco Ltd., 1 Forbes St., Fort Bombay Hindustan  Spg.  & Wvg.  Co. Ltd.,  16 Appollo
48 49
Street, Fort, Bombay.  . . ..
22,40,334
3>
1964-65
50
1962-63
jr
67,31,844 Hindustan  Construction  Co. Ltd.,  Construction House,  Ballard  Estate, Bombay.  . Hickson  &  Dadaji  Ltd., Shri  Pant  Bhayan,
51
12,35,801
JI
French Bridge, Bombay-7
1965-66
Hoechst Pharmaceutical  Pvt. Ltd., DougaJ] House
39
Backbay Reclamation Bombay-i.  .
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
36,03,510 38,41,217 48345.897
I.G.E.C. (India) Pvt. Ltd., Graham Road, Bom-
53
bay.  . . . . . ..
1965-66
19,57,868
I. G, Farben Industries, A. G. c/o S. B. Billimoria
54
& Co., ri3 M.G. Road, Bombay-i.
13.993500-
1965-66
Inarco Ltd., Advent Bldg., 12-A, Foreshore Road
55
"
16,58,687
1965-66
Fort, Bombay-i.
Indo-Nippon  Chemical  Co.  Ltd.,  Alice  Bldg.,
56
33
1964-65
Dr. D. N. Road, Fort, Bombay.
19380,577
Industrial  & Agricultural  Eng.  Co. Pvt.  L t d, 43
57
IS
Forbes Street, Bombay
1964-65 1965-66
I2,6l,87o i3>38,333
Indian Standard Metal Co. Ltd., Chinchpokli  St.,
58
15,01,036
"
Fort, Bombay.  . . . . ..
1964-65
The Indian Smelting & Refining Co. Ltd.,  Indus-
59
trial  Assurance Building, Fort,  Bombay..
1965-66
64.55.44 9'
60 Invoccnti  S.G.  Milno  Italy c/o Automobile  Pro-
11,04,671
1965-66
ss
ducts  India  Ltd.,  Bhandup, Bombay.
6T
20,45,863
1963-64
33
J.  B.  Advani,  Ocrlifcon  Electrodes  (P)  Ltd., Radio  House,  4th Floor  Rampart  ROWJ  Fort, Bombay-1.

4 2 94  T HE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA  :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PART  I I-
1
5
4
3
1
Khatau  Mikanji  Spt?.  &  Wvg.  Co.  Ltd.,  Laxmi
Building,  Ballard  Estate,  Bombay.
Co.
1963-64 r<)64-6s 1965-66
53,53,439 63,46,661 55,24,413
KViinoar  M'lli  Co.  Ltd.  KMlck  Hoisc,  H om  e Street,  Bombay  .  .  .  ,  .
1962-63 1963-64 1964-6*5 1965-66
43)29,152 23,10,479 43,84,632 53,25,404
Laxmi  Vishnu  Cotton  Mills  Ltd.,  9  Wallace
64
Street,  Bombay
)j
1962-63
I3)35>°7i
-65 M L.  Dahanukar  &  Co.,  Industrial  Assurance Building,  Fort,  Bombay  . . ..
J3
10,61,472
1965-66
Madhav  Mills  Ltd.,  127 Mahatma  Gandhi  Road,
66
Bombay-i
33
13
196a-63 1964-65
16,86,843 26,13,196 67 •68
62,53,916
?J
1965-66
Mazason  Dock Ltd.  Dockyard  Road,  Bombay-10 May  &  Baker  (Dcganshan)  Co.  Ltd.,  C/o  M/s. A.F. Ferguson  & Co. CAs.  Fort,  Bombay-i  . Maharashtra  Sugar  Mills,  Industrial  Assurance
•69
Building,  Fort.  Bombay
JJ
J)
70 Modern  Mills  Ltd.,  70, Forbes  St.,  Bombay
56,81,686 26,24,186 18,44379 22,46,761
73
1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1965-66
Mogul  Line  Ltd.,  16 Bank  St.,  Bombay Mulchandani  Electric  Radio  Industries  Ltd.,
7* 72
Sukh Nagar,  Bombay
1963-64
14,71,191
Merck  Sharp  &  Dhome  of  India  Ltd.,  Dougall
73
House,  Backbay Reclamation,  Bombay  .
33
42,23,542 56,23,997
1963-64 1964-65
N.  Sirur  & Co.  (P)  Ltd.,  70  Forbes,  Street  Fort,
74
Bombay
Ji
1965-66
i3)°7,3O5
National  Ecko  Radio  & Engg.,  Co.  Ltd.,  Ewart
75
House  Bruce  St.,  Fort,  Bombay
J5
23.53,136 22,67,899
1963-64 1964-65
National  Electricsls  Industries  Ltd.  Industrial
76
Estate,  Lalbaug,  Bombay-12
1964-65 1965-66
10,71,829 15,41,804
77
3>
13,19,961
1965-66
Nowrosjce  Wadia & Sons (P) Ltd.  Neville  House, Ballard  Estate,  Bombay  . . .. OHn  Mathcison  Chem  (P)  Ltd.  c/o  A.F.  Fer-
78
guson  &  Co.,  C.A.  Allahabad  Bank  Building, Bombay-i
JJ
60,01,551
1964-65
Protos  Eng.  Co.  Ltd.,  Thnkur  Co.  Nlwas,  Jam-
79
3?
shedji  Tata  Rd.,  Fort,  Bombay-i
1961-62
11,84,323
Premier  Construction  Co.  Ltd.,  Ballard  Estate,
•80
Bombay
ji
1964-65 1965-66
34,11,522 60,08,103
Premier  Automobiles  Ltd.,  Const.  Home,  Bal-
81
lard  EBtate,  Bombay
J3
1962-63
I,57,83J593
Ravalgaon  Sugar  Farm  Ltd., Construction  House,
•82
Ballard  Estate,  Bombay  . . ..
J)
1963-64
13.27.373
Richardson  & Cruddas  Ltd.  BycuUa Iron  Works,
S3
Byculla,  Bombay-8
H
1962-63 1963-64
20,69,691 22,54)537
Shreenivas  Cotton  Mills  Ltd.,  Shree  Nlwas
"4
i>
House,  Wauby  Road,  Ballard  Estate,  Bom- bay
62,76,423
1962-63
Simplex  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  30  Clerk  Road,  Jacob
85
it
23,11,108 Circle,  Bombay-it
1964-65
Sasoon  f-  David,  Ewart  House,  Bruce  Street,
36
33
Fort,  Bombay
1963-64 1964-65
17,25,676 13.87.929
Sasoon  Spg.  &  Wvg.  Co.  Ltd.,  Mafatlal  House,
87
JJ
1965-66
Fort,  Bombay
 
10,78,524

SEC  3(li)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4395
I
2
3
4
5
88 Smith  Kiline & French  (India) 25-31 Rope Walk
22,52,002
Street,  Bombay-i
Co.
1964-65
Standard  Mills  Ltd.,  Mafatlal  House,  Fort,
%
j  j
79,69,008 Bombay
1965-66
•90 Stewarts  & Lloyds  Ltd.,  c/o  Price  Water  House Peat  & Co.  B-4,  Gillander  House, N.S.  Road, Calcutta
50,73.000 34,73,669
1963-64 1965-66
91 Surat  Cotton  Spg.  & Wvj.  Mills  Ltd.s  Mafatlal
House,  Fort, Bombay-
JJ
1965-66
18,68,535
92 Swadeshi  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  Bombay  House,  Bruce
St.,  Fort,  Bombay
J>
1962-63
53.3i.893
Tata  Hydro Elec. Agencies  Ltd.,  Bombay House,
93
J)
Bruce  Street,  Fort,  Bombay
JJ
1965-66 1963-64
33,89,636 17.57.932 Tata  Mills  Ltd.  Do.  . . .. Tata  Hydro  Power  Supply  Co,  Ltd.,  address  as
•94 95
S3
above  . . . . . ..
J3
1964-65 1962-63
3)
1964-65
92,00,019 67,92^073 1,73^3,627 Tata  Sons Pvr. Ltd.  Do. Tata  Power Co  Ltd.,  Do. United  Salt  Works  &  Industries  Ltd.,  121-125
96 97 •98
",97."6 M^dows  St.,  Bombay  . . ..
33
1963-64
99 Union  Carbide  Corpn.  c/o  Ford Rhodes  Parkes & C o,  Bank  of  Baroda  Bldg. Appolo  Street, Bombay
28,98,000
jy
1965-66
TOO
Vac-U-Mation  Ltd.,  Forbes  Bdg.,  Home
13,45,081 Street,  Bombay
1965-66
J3
TOI W.H.  Brady  &  Co.  Ltd.,  Brady  House  12/14
24.99*588 Veer Narimin  Roid,  Bombay
37
1963-64
1 02
Walchandnagar  Industries  Pvr.  Ltd.,  Construc-
3>
tion  House, Ballard  Estate,  Bombay  .
1 03 IO4 IO5
i>
Walchand  & Co. Pvt. Ltd.,  Do. Wallace B^os. Co. Ltd., 9 Wallace St. Bombay Wallace  Flour Mills Co. Ltd., address as above
1963-64 1965-66 1964-65 1962-63 1963-64
30,00,295 36,87,137 ".57,335 49,76,422 36,66,103
1 06
10,68,053
Warner  Hindustan  Ltd.,  Savey Chambers, Wallace
1965-66
St.  Bombay
„
BOMBAY  CITY-II
1 07
Asian Oil and Paints  Co. (P) Ltd., Oil Chambers,
Dalai  Co.  Street,  Bombay  . . ..
3>
1962-63 1961-62
19,76,640 11,72,712
R.F.
IO8 1 09
Automatic  Electric  Devices, Wadala Bombay  . Bakelite  India  Pvt.  Ltd.,  India  House,  Opp.
G.P.O.  Bombay
Co.
1965-66
10,79.033
1 10 Beck  &  Co.  (India)  Ltd.,  Gateway  Buildings,
it
Appollo  Bunder,  Bombay-1
1965-66
13,91.573
I II British  Drug  Houses  (I)  Pvt.  Ltd.,  8  Graham
Road,  Ballard  Estate,  Bombay-1
3?
1964-65
35.89:057
1 12 Cement  Agencies  Ltd.,  121, Queens  Road,  Fort,
Bombay-i
It
12,67,038 30,90,507
1962-63 1963-^4
Chrinriri  Colliery  Co.  18/22  Sk.  Memon  St.,
"3
Bombay
11,23,566
1962-63
R.F.
1 14 Colgate  Palmolivc  India  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Steel  Crete
15,22499 House,  Dinshawach Road,  Bombay-i
Co.
1965-66
1 15 Colgate  Palmolive  Co.  U.S.A.  c/o  Colgate  Pal-
}}
molivc  India  Ltd.,  Steel  Crete  House,  Dinsha- wacha  Road,  Bombay-1  . . ..
31,96,636
1965-66
'•41, 30,518 Crompton  Parkinson  Ltd.,  c/o  Sharp  & Tannan, C.A.  s. Appolle  St.,  Bank  of  India  Bldg.,  Fort, Bombay
 
1965-66

4Z96  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA  :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIRA  27.  1889  [PART  II,-
I
2
3
4
5
117 Emedia  Export  Co.  m.b.h.  Commercial  House,
 
Co.
1965-66
11,00,508
118
Dr.  Annie  Basant Road, WorH,Bombay-i8  , Gammon  India  Ltd.,  Gammon  House,  Prabhadcvi
1961-62
GadellRd.,  Bombay-28
37,59,783
119 GoefTery  Manners  & Co.  Magnet  House,  Ballard
Estate,  Dougal Road, Bombay-1
66,22,085-
13
1965-66
120 Creaves Cotton  & Co. Ltd.,  1, Forbes  Street, Fort,
Bombay-i
1960-61
48,41,278
I2T Creaves  Cotton  & Crompton  Parkinson  Ltd.,  1,
Forbes  Street,  Fort,  Bombay
.1.1
1960-61
1961-62
23,93,782 I5,63,97O
122 Hardcastle  &  Waud  Mfg.  Co.  Pvt.  Ltd.,  Alice
J3
Bldg., Dr. D. N. Road., Fort, Bombay  .
1965-66
12,05,307
123 Hoechst  Dyes  & Chemicals  Ltd.,  Veer  Nariman
. ij
Road,  Bombay
13,42,036-
1963-64
T24 International  Computors  &  Tabulators  Ltd., U.K.  Magnet  House,  Dougal  Rd.,  Ballard Estate,  Bombay-i  . . ..
53
1961-62 1962-63 1963-64
18,52,477
17,68,023.
19,22,743;
125 International  Computors  &  Tabulators  (I)  Pvt. Ltd.,  Magnet  House,  Dougall  Road,  Bom- bay-i
33
18,57,583:
20,98,792
33,40,309
1960-61 1961-62 1965-66
126 Indian  Vegetables  Products  Ltd.3  Forbes  Build-
ing,  Home  Street,  Bombay-i  .
22,21,239-
n-i
1965-66
Indian  Schering Ltd.,  Mercantile  Chambers,  Gr-
127
I4,O4,l65
aham Road, Ballard Estate,  Bombay-1  .
.13
1965-66
128 India  Tube  Mills  & Metal  India  Pvt.  Ltd.,  126
",90,833:
Narayan  Dhru  Street,  Bombay
•>y
1965-66
129 Kasturchand  Sarupchand,  Dalai  St.,  Frort,
Bombay  R.F.
1961-62
I5>79,923:
130 Mahindra  &  Mahindra  Ltd.,  Gateway  Building,
)0.
Appolo Bunder, Bombay  .  .  .  .  C
II,7I,O96
22,15,926.
32,85,98^
83,37,039'
15,05,820
1955-5*
1956-57
1957-58
1962-63
1965-66
J3
131 132
Poison Ltd.,  65-B, Dockyard Road, Bombay-io  . S.H.  Kelkar, & Co. P. Ltd.  36 Mangaldas  Road,
3i
1965-66
BOmbay-2
11,77,367
133 Sandoz India Ltd.  3 Wittct Road Ballard Estate,
Bombay-i
J3
T962-63
i4>77>037
Shapoorji  Pallonji  &  Co.  P.  Ltd.,  70  Medowo
134
S)
Street,  Bombay
22,66,ior
24,49,045
1962-63
1963-64
Swastik  Oil  Mills  Ltd.,  Saltpan  Road,  Wadala,
135
Bombay-31
13
16,22,035
18,66,2191
1964-6J
1965-66
BOMBAY  CITY-III
Abdul  Sakoor  Umar  Sahigaia  &  Co  78,  Khand
136
10,74,230-
1962-63
R.F.
Bazaar,  Bombay
Cable  Corpn  of  India  Ltd.,  6,  Ballard,
137
1,02,59,262.
Co.
Estate,  Bombay
i9"3-"4
Cadbury  Fry  (Export)  Ltd., Bhulabhl  Desai
138
16,66,903
1965-66
>j
Road,  Bombay-26
D.  Macropolo  8t  Co.  Ltd.,  Kalamni
139
22,99,808:
1964-65
")
Bldg.  Dr.  D.N.  Road,  Bombay
F.  E.  Dlnsha  Ltd.,  Esplanade House, 2nd  Floor,
140
Waudby  Road,  Bornbay-i.
1963-64 1964-65
10,04,563,
11,28,474

tma  S(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1M7/KARTIKA  27. 1889  4397
2
r
3
4
5
141 Gabriel  India  Ltd.,  Agt"  Road,  Mulund,
Bombay-80
Co.
1964-65
20,38,679
142 Golden  Tobacco  Co Pvt. Ltd., Tobacco  House,
Ghodbundcr  Road,  Vile  Park,  Bom-
bay-56
Co.
1964-6$
i,39)57>43i
i" Hlco  Products  Pvt. Ltd., Co,  Mogal  Lane, Mahim, Bombay.  . . . .. Co.
1963-64
",33>i°9
144 Indian  Guarantee  & General  Inge.  Co.  Ltd., Grashan  Assce.  House,  2nd Floor,  Sir P. M. Road,  Bombay-i  ,
30,1 9,014
Co.
1963-66
Jaybharat  Insc.  Co. Ltd., French  Bank  Bldg.,
U5
Homji  St.,  Bombay-i
Co.
15,22,309
1960-61
The  Life  Insurance  Corp.  of  India,  Jeevan
14S
Kcndra, Jamshedji  Tata  Road,  Bombay-i  . Co.
1960-61 1964-65
6,09,10,795 IO,34>37>377
147 Maharashtra  State  Road  Transport  Corpn., Maharashtra  Vahamk  Bhavan,  Bcllosis Road,  Bombay-8  . . . .. Co.
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
2 ,9 1,19.625 3,15,80,788 3,28,54,715
148 The  New  India  Awo. Co Ltd.,  New  India
Assce.  Bldg..  M G. Road,  Bombay-i.
Co.
1960-61 1,13,94,003
BOMBAY  (CENTRAL)
French  Dyes &  Chemicals  (India)  Pvt. Ltd., 3,
149
Queen's  Road,  Bombay  .
17,28,946
1961-62
Comp,
150 I.  A. Makani  & Co., Dr. D. N.  Road,  Bombay A8
[C,
16,45,200 Agents  of M/s. Oaman  Haji  Lawrance  Merqi East  Africa
1964-65
A.O.P.
Khatau  VallabhdM  & Co., Indian  Globe  Cham-
151
10,10,595
1961-62
bers,  Fort Street,  Bombay-1
R.F.
DELHI
1965-66
Ltd. Co.
13^7.958 Bcherial  Asian  Corp  (P) Ltd., New Delhi Coai  Cola  Exporr  Corpn.  of  India  (P),  Najaf
152 153
39.20,067
1965-66
Garh  Road,  Delhi
1965-66
15.07,531 154
20,21,266
1964-65
Es*;x  Farms  (P)  Lrd., New  Delhi Raven  Talbros  (P) Ltd., Najafgarh  Road, Delhi  . . . . . ..
State  Trading  Corpn.  of  India,  Zafar
156
1963-64 4,49,41,806 Marg,  New  Delhi
DELHI  (CENTRAL)
1963-64
1.11,776
Company
Dalmia  Comcnt  Ltd., 4,  Scindla  Hou9e, New
157
Delhi
(India)
25,89,021
(Pakistan)
Dalmia  Cement  (Bharar) Ltd., 4, Sdndia  House,
158
New  Delhi  .  ,  .  „
1962-63 1962-63
64,75,604 14,28,647
Ltd.  Co.
Dhampur  Sugar  Mills  Ltd.,  Dhampur Dharam  Singh  Ram  Singh  (Motors^)  P. Ltd.,
159 160
58,82,483
1961-62
3 '5,  Asaf  Ali  Road,  New  Delhi
B.  Dharam  Singh  Ram Singh,  3/5,  Asaf Ali
161
1961-62
Road,  New  Delhi
R.F.
22,86,735
Golcha  Properties  (P) Ltd,.  Golcha  Gardens,
162
14,97,117
1961-62
Company
163
1961-62
18,33,050
U.R.F.
Purana  Ghat,  Jaipur  . . .. W.  L.  Kohli  &  Co., 6-A,  Connaught Place,  New  Delhi  . . ..

42O8  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  IS,  Iflfl7/KARTIKA  27,  18S9  [PA*T  H-
I 3
3
4
5
GUJARAT-I
Ajit  Mills  Co  Ltd.,  Rakhial  Road,
164
Ahm-dabad
Ltd.  Co. 1963-63
'14,05413
Halav  Suit  and  Chemical  Works,  Grain
165
Market.  Jamnngar
13,41,600
R.F.
1963-63
Indiar  El-ctro  Chemicals  Ltd.,  Odhav  Road,
166
Odhav,  P B.  No.  117,  Ahmedabad
Ltd.  Co.  T
14,21,262
1965-66
GUJARAT-11
167 Ahmedabad  New  Cottn  Mills  Ltd.,  Kokhara
M'-'hmcdabad,  Ahmedabad
Co.
168 Alembic  GlasB  Industries  Ltd.,  Baroda-3
Ltd.  Co.
1962-63 1963-64 1963-64 1964-63 1964-65
Co.
21,61,728 11,72.304 42  12,938 32.47,805 1^7,45,396 169 170
Ambica  Mills  Ltd.,  Kankaria,  Ahmedabad Aruna  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  Naroda  Road,
Ahmedabad  . . . . ..
"J
1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
38,33.218
26.77,920
2601,198
18,26,987
171 Arvind  Mills  Co Ltd.,  Naroda  Road,  Ahme-
dabad
1959-60 1965-66
7T,46,875 52,24,540
172 Arvind  Board  &  Paper  Prod.  Ltd.,  BIUI-
 
mora  . . . . . .. P. Ltd.  Co.
1961-62
10,28,434
Ami  Starch  ProductB  Ltd.,  Naroda  Road,
173
Ahmedabad
Co.
1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
2^59,504 3^41*314 29,54,866 28 49,430 26,49.365
174 Ashok  Mills  Co  Ltd.,  Naroda  Road, Ahmedabad  . . . . ..
1962-63 1964-65 1965-66
25,12,886 11,13,777 19,34,474
Awl  Products  Ltd., Naroda  Road,  Ahmeda-
175
bad
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
79,32,993
1,19,13,843
1,01,84,764
176 Commercial  Ahmedabad  Mills  Co. Ltd,, Ah- medubad  . . . . . ..
3:
1962-63 1963-64
24,24,122
20,14,144
177
>.
1965-66
10,36,030
178
Distributors  Ltd.,  Jeralpur  Road,  Bnro- da-3  . . . . . .. New  Commercial  Mills  Co Ltd.,  Ahmeda-
bad
,1
1962-63
34.34.551
New  India  Industries  Ltd., Jetalpur  Road,
179
Baroda
3i
1965-66
37.08,097
ISO Nutan  Mills  Co.  Ltd., Anil  Road,  Ahmeda-
bad
12,68,882
23,04,044
I3.i7,3tt
10,20,636
1961-62 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
181 Ralpur  Mfg. Co Ltd., Outside  Saraspur  Gate3
Ahmedabad
1959-60 1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65
 
1593-043 20,36,836 28,68,593 32,17,716 26,03,094 18,60,778

S
3
2
I
4
Saraspur  Mills  Co. Ltd.,  Saraspur  Ahmeda-
182
Co.
bad
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65
30,03,609 12.61,671 I3.°3'"?5
Vijay  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  Naroda  Road,
183
M
Ahmedabad
11,64,042
17,84,788
1960-61
1961-62
KERALA
67.20,072
1965-66
20,00,21)5
1962-63
„
184 185 186
19,96,617
1965-66
Aluminium  Industries  Ltd.,  Kundara
Harrisons & Crossficld  Ltd.,  Quilon
Travancore  Chemicals  Ltd.,  Udyogamandah
Alwaye  . . . . . ..
MADHYA  PRADESH
R.F.
Bhagwandas  Shobhalal,  Sagar
187
\
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65
1965-66
13,57,993
10,96 797
11,60,642
13.93.547
188
3,17,52,896
1961-62
Gwalior  Rayon  Silk  M f g.  ( W v g .)  C o. . . ..
L t d .,  Gwalior
N u i o n a l N u ws  Print  and  Paper  Mille  L t d .,  N a pa
189
42.42.13*
Co.
1964-65
Nagar  . . . . . ..
MADRAS-I
A.  Roakc  Roberts  &  Co.  (India)  (P)  Ltd,,  St.
190
13,68,115
Thomas Mount, Madras-21
1 91
Jl
1965-66
1965-66
1964-65
I9>3°>948 i7,I7,754
193
A. & F. Harvey Ltd., West Veli Street, Madural.
Amrutanjan Ltd., Madras-i
Arruppukottai  Sri  Jayavilas  (P)  Ltd.s  Arruppu-
11,07,430
1965-66
1)
kottai
.  .  .
t94
1965-66
i5,70.995
JJ
Madras-1  .
Binny & Co. (London)  Ltd.,  Armenian  Street,
.  .
Binny&Co.  (Madras)  Ltd.,  Armenian  Street,
I9S
>3
Madras-i
. . . ..
27,21,943
29.33.428
54.90.717
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
Deccan  Sugar  &  Abkhari  Company  Ltd.,  Dare
196
"
ft
1961-62
1961-62
1961-62
1965-66
House, Madras •  .  .  . E.I.D. Parry Ltd., Dare House,  Madras-i Express Newspapers Ltd., Mount Road, Madras-2. Fcnncr Cockil Ltd., K ochadai, Madurai Gorden  Woodroffee  Leather  Manufacturing  Co.
197 198 199 3 00
30,92,979
96,16,261
11*42,489
24,78,019
11,17^124
1965-66
"
Ltd., North Beach Road,  Madras-i
Madural  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  West  Veil  Street,
2 01
1964-65
1,12,13,193
Madurai
. . ..
Mysore  Fertilisers  Co., 31-B, North Beach Road,
2 02
Firm
Madras
".51.337
11,14,511
10,72,104
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
Pandyan  Insurance  Co. Ltd.,  West  Veli  Street,
703
Co,
Madurai
1965-66
1961-62
1961-62
14,55,708
19,55,597
10,64,980
Parry & Co. Ltd., Dare House,  Madras-1 Parry Confectionary Ltd., Dare House, Mfldras-i Perkls  (Peterborough)  Ltd.,  U.K.  C/o  M/s
204 205 206
15^4,0*5
1965-66
Frazer & Roass, Mds.-i
Rukmani  Mills  Lt  .,  Meenakshi Nilayam,  Thlru-
207
14,62,694
1964-65
"
parankundram Road,  Maduxai
1965-66
45^3,783 208 Southern Roadways (P) Ltd., Kochadal,  Madurai Sree Meenakshi Mills  Ltd.,  Tniruparankundram
1964-65
H
Road, Madurai  . . . ..

I
2
3
5
4
2IO
Sundaram  Industries  (PvL) Ltd.,  T.V.S.  Build-
ings, Madurai  .
. ..
1965-66
Co.
42>97A30
3 11
T.  V.  Sundwam  lyengar  &  Sons  Private  Ltd,,
Madurai
1965-66
47,88,724
M A D R A S - II
2 12
"
3 13 3 14
25.56,212
20,12,496
12,53,91$
1964-65 1963-64 1962-63
Ashok  Leyland  Ltd.,  Ennore,  Madras Dhanalflkshmi  Mills  L t d .,  Tlrupur Gobald  Motor  Service  Co. (P)  Ltd.,  Tirupur Lakhmi  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  Pappanaicken-Palayam,
Coimbatore
3)
1962-63 1963-64
52^39.^79 4 9 J 8 9 >273
2 l6 Madras  Auto  Service (P)  Ltd.,  36, Mount  Road, Madras  . . . . . ..
1965-66
23,66,192
2 17 Madras  Motor  &  General  Insurance  Co.  Ltd.,
1965-66 1962-63
^7377^O8 12,83,682 52, Peters  Road, Madras  . . .. Pierce Lcsslte&  Co., Cochin  . . .. Premier  Mills  (CBE)  Ltd.,  Pulankinar,  Udumal-
3 l8 219
p ct  .  .  .
. ..
I)
24,52,039
1964-65
3 20 Radhaknshna  Mills  Ltd.,  Peelamedu,  Coimba-
tore
26,50,860
S>
1964-65
2 21 Sundaram  Finance  Ltd.,  52, Petera  Road,  Mad-
ras
}t
35,46,982
1965-66
2 33 Sundamm  Motors  (P)  Ltd.,  37,  Mount  Road,
Madras  .
. ..
]]
3 23 3 34
Spencer  & Co.  Ltd.,  Mount  Road,  Madras V.D.  Swamy  & Co. (P)  Ltd.,  175/ r,  Mount  Road,
JJ
1965-66 1964-65 1961-62
28,28.984 20,36,375 12,28,030
Madras
MADRAS  C E N T R AL
1963-64
JJ
2 I J 7 ° J 4 34 Canara  Workshops  Ltd.,  M"ngalorc  . Davangerc  Cotton  Mills  Ltd.,  P.B. No.  5,  Davan-
3 25 3 26
gcre
}J
1962-63
23,98,994
J V C IE
Bangalore  Woollen,  ^Cotton  &  Silk  Co.  Ltd.,
2 27
3}
Bangalore  . ..
. ..
i)
R . F. Co.
i?
3J
1965-66 1965-66 1964-65 1963-64 1965-66 1965-66
1,09,55,653 10,27,526 I5.37J7OO M5,48,688 1,73,805578 80,12,086 Consolidated  Coffee  Estates  Polibetta,  Coorg D.  Cawasji  & Co.,  Bangalore  . . .. Hindustan  Machine  Tools  Ltd.,  Bangalore Indian  Telephone  Industries,  Ltd.,  Bangalore Kirloskar  Elec,  Co.  Ltd.,  Bangalore  . Kirlonkar  Associates,  C/o  The  Mysore  Kirloskar
2 28 3 39 3 30 3 31 232 333
18,29,284 Ltd.,  Harihar  . . . . ..
R . F.
1965-66
Co.
to
jj
Mangalorc  Ganesh  Beedi  Works,  Mysore Motor  Industries  Ltd.,  Bangalore Mysore  Elec.  Industries,  Bangalore Robert  Bosch  Gmbh,  Bangalore Tunghabadra  Steel  Products  Ltd.,  Hospet United  Brevcrics  Ltd.,  Bangalore
1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66
234 235 236 337 338 339
20,26,261 2,39,50,726 43,94.439 31,44,168 12,17,531 43,35,760
POONA
1,56,46,112
Ltd.  Co. 1964-65
340 2 41
H
3}
}J
}S
Asbestos  Cement  Ltd.,  Mulund,  Bombay-80 Birhan  Maharashtra  Sugar  Syndicate  I,td.,  980, Sadashiv  Peth,  Poona  . . .. Kirloskar  Bros.  Ltd.,  SangU  . . .. Kirloskar  Oil  Engines,  Poona-3 Kirloskar  Pneumatic  Co. Ltd.,  Poona Ugar  Sugar  Works  Ltd.,  Sangli
1961-62 1960-61 1963-64 1962-63 1963-64
2 42 243 244 245
 
19,85,683 22,90,937 89,09,847 22,18,188 34,84,377

SKC.  3(11)]  THE GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 19U7/KARTIKA  27, 1889  4301
I  2
5
3
4
Rs.
PUNJAB
246  Dyer Meak in Breweries (P) Ltd.,  Solan.  .  .  Company. 1961-62
Do.  . ..
Do. 1962-63
1,00,84,816 93.35>8O7
247  Fertilizer  Corpn.  of  India,  Agents  to  Saint
Do.
:. F.
Do. Do.
1961-62 1965-66 1962-63 1963-64 1963-64 1962-63
58,33^65 13,64,342 17,51,058 16,08,568 12,90,918 13,36,222 Gobaing, Nangal,  . . .. 248  Patram Dass Raja  Ram, Bed  K 249  Pepsu Road Trpt,  Corporation, Patiala.  :  .  Company. 250  Pure Drinka (P) Ltd., Patiala. 251  Pure Drinks (Cal) (P) Ltd., Patiala. 252  Straw Board Mfg.  Co. Ltd., Hoshiarpur,  .  .  Public Ltd. Company.
RAJASTHAN
2 53  Associated  S t o ne  I n d u s t r i e s,  ( K o t a h)  L i m i t e d,
R a m g a nJ  m a n d i.  . . . ..
Co.
1963-64 1964-65
17,27,924 17=27,589
U.P. I.
254  Geep  Flaah  Light  Industries  L t d ., 28-South  Road.
Allahabad.  . . . . ..
Co.
19=09,874
1965-66
255  J- K. Manufacturing  L t d ., i-Kamla  Tower,
Kanpur.
. . . . ..
256  New Victoria  Mills L t d ., Kanpur.
17.60,657 19,26,008 25,2-,382 Do.
Do. Do. Do.
1962-63 1961-62 1962-63
U.P. II.
2 57  R.  S.  M a d ho  R am 5c  S o n s,  n - R a j p ur  R o a d3
D e h r a d u n.  . . . . ..
R F.
1962-63
11,33,214
WESTBENOAL—I
Comply,
30,00,000
1965-66
258  A. G. Leader, 20, Theatre Rd,, Calcutta.  . 259  Alfred  Herbert (I) Pvt. Ltd.,  13/3, Strand Road,
Calcutta
Si
1,21,01,414 14^8,960
1964-65 1965-66
261O  American Export  Lines  Inc.,  C/o M/s.  Lionel
Edwards  Pvt, Ltd., 24 Old Court  House St., Calcutta.  . . . . . ..
3,
17.01.826
1965-66
261  Atlas Assurance Co. Ltd., 6, Lyons Range, Cal-
cutta
,2
?j
1965-66 1962-63
TT.C7 Q2T 11,91,956 262  Associated Power Co. Ltd., 8, Clive Row,  Calcutta 263  Birla  Jute  Mfg. Co. Ltd., 15, India  Exchange
Place, Calcutta
JJ
1962-63
1963-14
86,98,942 1,60,18,730
JJ
1962-63
78.^8  fi
Calcutta
Public  Ltd.
Co.
1963-64 1964-65
29,66,617 44.91.100
266  Calcutta  Tramways  Co. Ltd., P-4 Mission Row
Extrt. Calcutta.
Co.
TT.OT  6rt7
1965-66
267  Caledonian Jute Mills Co. Ltd.., 9, Brabourne Rd.
Calcutta
19.56.304
Public Ltd Compari
.  1963-64 V.  lOftA^fin
J J , U I , 5 34 268  Coles Cranes of India Ltd., 1, Taratolla  Road,
Calcutta
Comnnnv  TA^I  £~
269  Commercial  Combine Ltd., 5, Synogogue  St.,
15.30,376
Calcutta
a  —
270  Delta Jute  Mills Co. Ltd., 8, Clive Row, Calcutta. Public Ltd.,  1963-64
33.54.231
Company.
1962-63 1965-66
271  Ganges Mfg. Co.Ltd,  I r, Rabindra  Sarani, Cal. 273  Ganges Rope Co. Ltd., 2, Fairlie Place,  Calcutta. 273  GoBtctncr D upHcator (P) Ltd., 21, Old Court
S3
•J J  l-r £r*j 3 4 J 4I' O 74 33 J 3 ° , 9 I3 31,06,612 House,  St., Calcutta
M
274  Hastings Mills Ltd.,  14, Netaji  Subhas Rd., Cal.
I9fi3-64 1964-65 1963-64 1964-6;
 
49,33*046 27*33*302

4302  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KAB.TIKA  27, 1189  (TAW  H-
I
2
3
4
5
WEST  BENGAt^-I—Contd,
Hindustan Motors Ltd., 15, India Exchange Place,
375
3,00,65,188
Calcutta.  .  .  .  .
 
Coy.
1962-63
276   Howriih Iron & Steel Works Pvt. Ltd., 90, Beaerau
        Road, Howrah                                                 1964-65         " J 3 3 > 4 I5
377  Imperial  Tobacco  Co. Ltd., 37,  Chowringhee
        Road, Cal                                                    1963-64

5,07,50,071
32,37,941
I392,97J527
1964-65
„
278 279 2 80
India Foils Ltd.,11,  Sooterkin  St., Cal.  . Indian Cable Co. Ltd., 9 Hare St., Cal.  . Indian  Standard  Wagon  Co. Ltd., 12, Mission
Do.
1388,57,776
Row, Calcutta
. . ..
2 81
1963-66
Si
42.563559
Japan  Lines  Ltd. (Formerly Nittoo  Shosen Co. Ltd.)  C/o International  Clearing  & Shipping Agency, P-31/323 India  Exchange Place, Cal- cutta
Kawasahi Risen Kaisha Ltd., C/o F. W. Heilgers
2 82
Ltd., Chartered  Bank Buildings, Calcutta
283
12,46,119
5",O2y4di7
Khardah Co. Ltd., 7, Wellesly Place, Calcutta  .  ]
1964-65 I963-64
Public Ltd. Co.
London & Lanchasire Insurance Co. Ltd., 5 & 7
284
Nfctaji  Subhas Road,  Calcutta
Coy.
22,64,023
21,98,254
i9"4-<5 1965-66
Mannadhan Comp. (India) Ltd., 5, Synagogue St.,
285
32,00,000
1063-64
Calcutta  .
MiddletonInvestment  Co.Ltd., 37, Chowringhee
286
2jtX),"0,00
1965-66
Road, Calcutta  . . . . .. Naihati Jute Mills Ltd., 33, Netaji Subhas Road,
287
Calcutta
17^2,319
1963-64
Public Ltd. Co.
Nippo  Yusen  Kalshfl, C/oM/sJamerFinlay & Co.
288
15,72,008
1963-66
Ltd., 2, Netaji  SubhaB Road,  Calcut  ^
Coy.
Patna  Electric  Supply Co. Ltd., 14, Old Court
289
Do.
19.13.744
House St., Cal.
290
1964-65
16,70,644
„
Ralleigh  Investment Co. Ltd., 37, Chowringhee Road, Calcutta  . . . . .. Royal  Exchange  Assurance  Co. Ltd., 6, Lyons
2 91
14.583528
1965-66
Range, Cal
2 92 Royal Insc. Co. Ltd., 3 & 7.Netaji Subhas Road,
is
173123539
1963-64
Calcutta
S.  V.  Industries  (P)  Ltd.,  5,  Synagogue  St.,
2 "3
25,00,000
))
1964-63
Cal.,
Shamnuggar'jote  Factory  Co. Ltd., 3,  Clive
294
Do
55373.7O9
3J
Row, Calcutta
Sperry  Rand  Pvt.  Ltd., Qo  M/s  Lovelock  &
295
19*5-66
]>
43316,345 Lewes, 4 Lyons Range, Calcutta  .
Statesman  Ltd., 4,  Chowringhee  Square, Cal-
2 ""
,3
1964-65
31.74,519 cutta  . . . . . •• Titaghur  Jute  Factory  Co. Ltd., 3, CSive Row,
297
14,28,128
l9"3-"4
Calcutta
Public Ltd. Co. Victoria Jute Co. Ltd., 3, CHve Row, Calcutta  .  „
1964-65
30,03,950
298
•
WEST  BENOAL-IJ
Andrew  Yule  & Co. Ltd., 8,  Cllve  Row, Cal-
299
5O,56y4l0
1964-65
cutta  Coy.
Assam  Dooars  Tea  Co. Ltd., 31, N.  S. Rd.,
3 00
JJ
Cal.
16,04,271
io,i9)3i8
1963-64
1964-65
3 01 Bengal  Flour  Mills  Co.  Ltd.,  21, N.S. Rd.,
I]
Calcutta
;
1064-65
1965-66
13.63.73*
n.57.509
Biria  Gwallor  Pr.  Ltd.,  15,  India  Ex.  Place,
3 02
26.67,623
1965-66
Cal.

I
3
4
5
Brook  Bond & Co. Ltd., 9, Shakespeare  Sarani,
303
Calcutta.
1965-66
Coy.
58,56,050
Calcutta  Discount  Co. Ltd., 8, Clive Row, Cal-
304
1963-64
2441,597 cutta  . . . . . .. Central  India Industry Ltd., 15, India  Exchange
3O5
PU^e,  C i l c im
1965-66
21,40,224
."
306 Consolidated  Tea & Land  Co. (I) Ltd., 2, N.S.
Do.
Road,  Calcutta
15
307 Diamond Products Ltd.,  4, Clive Row, Calcutta.
1963-64
X964-65
12,30,066
18,68,91a
16,59,651
3^8 East Ganhoodih Colliery Prv. Ltd., 135, Canning
1965-66
St.,  Calcutta
?>
10,89,492
3O9 Jokal  (Assam)  Tea Co. Ltd., 21, N.S. Road,
Calcutta
15,08,058
1964-65
310 Kanan  Devan  Hills  Produce  Co. Ltd., 2, N S.
Road,  Calcutta
37,84.926
25.35.o67
31,46,576
11,76,625
Regd.  Firm
1961-63 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
3"
"44>4?5 Lovdock  & Lewes,  4, Lyons Range, Calcutta.  .  : Nfajrrifarm  Tea  Co.  Ltd., 4,  Mangoe  Lane,
Calcutta.  .
Coy.
1963-64 1962-63
12,49.8*3
I7,7B,XQ8
313 The  Phosphate  Co. Ltd-.,  14, N.S. Rd., Calcutta. Punjab  Produce  & Trading  Co. Ltd., 15, India
314
1965-66
Exchange  Place, Calcutta
"
27^*0^97
jSutna  Stone & Lime  Co. Ltd., 6, Middle Rd.,
3*5
1963-64
Calcutta-22
15,12,870
316
Do.
12^99=075
Teliapara  Tea Co. (P) Ltd., 31, N.S. Rd., Calcutta Trivcni  Tissues  Co. (P) Ltd., 24-B, Park  St.,
317
Calcutta.
f>
49,82491
73J6O,697
1962-63
1963-64
318 Tube  Investment  Ltd., B-4, Gillander  House,
1965-66
Calcu'ta
1962-63
Western Bengal Coal Fields,  Caloutta.  .  ,
319
18,07,500 ^ 7 i * "5
WEST  BENGAL-III
3BO
Company
Bowreah Cotton MUls, Calcutta.
1964-65
19&5-66
17,19,795
io.34v*G5
321 British  Painti  India  Ltd.,  33,  Chowringhee
48,44)686
1965-66
Road, Calcutta
i>
322 Deys  Medical  Stores  (Mfg.)  Pvt. Ltd.,  6/D,
1964-65
Liniiay  St., Calcutta
" J 3 1 , H3
East  Inlia  Pharmaceutical  Works  Ltd.,  102,
323
1965-66
I9>53,I28
S.P.  Mukherjee  Rd-  Calcutta.  .
Eotiiacr'i  Syndicate  Iniia  (P) Ltd., 21,  Old
324
1961-63
Gj-irt  HDLHO  St.,  Cilcutta
1965-66
Oitn  Keen  & Mcttlcforta  Ltd.  Calcutta.  .
I3.4i,737 76,4 M9 5 335 326 Imperial  Che-nical  Ini.  L t d .,  (London)}  34, Chowringhoe  Rd., Calcutta.  . . ..
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1,18,52,548
1*44,75=533
1,72,83,704
Iniiati  O w g en  Ltd.,  48ft,  Diamond  Harbour
327
1963-64
Ri.j  Calcutta
 
i.5*>54.779

I
3
4
5
3*8
I J 3 I . 5 4 J I 4I
1963-64 1964-65
;,,25J59,5O7
,.1 "1
Metal Boi Co. of India Ltd.  Ctlcnttt.  . Metal Box Co. Overseas Ltd.  Calcutta.  . Oricntial  Rubber  Works,  171/A,  M.G.  Road,
329 330
1961-62
10,86483 Calcutta
CALCUTTA  (CENTRAL)
Agarpara  Co. Ltd., 1 & 2 Old Court House Sta
331
1961-62
Coy.
16,80,580 Calcutta
Aminchand  Pyarclal,  153,  Canning  St.,  Cal-
332
cutta
1961-62 1960-61
1,36,41,058 3,98,11,421
H.F. Co.
333 334
1961-62
18,80,637
"
Assam Oil Co. Ltd., Dlgboi, Assam B. N. Ellas  & Co. Ltd., 1 & 2, Old Court House, St.,  Calcutta.  . . . . .. Bengal Jute Mills Co. Ltd., 8, Dalhousie  Square
335
Do.
' 26,91,396 East, Calcutta
1960-61
23,10,832
1962-63
50,10,272 Bharatiya Janapith, 9, Alipore Park, Place Cal.  ,  AOP Birla  Broa. P. Ltd., Royal Exchange Place, Cal. . Co. Burma Oil Co. (India Trading Ltd.)  Digboi,  .
336 337 338
Assam  . . . . . ..
1964-65
36,63,907
339
Do.
J>
7"56,77,2i3 Burma Shell  Oil Storage& Dist. Co. of India Ltd., Ballard  Estate, Bombay  . . .. Burma Oil Co. Ltd., C/o Price Water House Peat
34°
& Co., 8, Neteji  Subhash Rd., Calcutta.
4,00,07,502
it
1965-66
Chrestien  Mica  Indust.  Ltd., 4, Lyons  Range,
341
Calcutta
"
43>67*528
1961-62
G. S. Atwal & Co. (Assansol),  G.T. Road, Assan-
342
Do.
R.F.
22,30,214
343
Indo Burma Petroleum  Co. Ltd., C/o Price Water House Peat &: Co.,  8,  Netaji  Subhash  Rd., Calcutta
Co.
R.F.
1965-66 1961-63
2649,126 19,58,986 Lobia  Sultanla  Co., 132, Cotton  St., Calcutta.  . Md.  Scrajuddln  &  Bros.,  P-16,  Bentdck  S t,
344 345
Calcutta.
jj
Do.
10,01,247
National Screw & Wire Products Ltd., "Stephen
346
10,18,274
Co.
1963-64
Housc"4  ,  Dalhousie  Square, Calcutta,,  , Reliance  Firebricks  &  Pottery  Co., 4,  Lyons
347
Range, Calcutta.
343
"•< " AOP
1961-62 Do. 1960-61
^10,00,434 27,15.5^5 24,62,435 349 35°
Rohtas  Industries  Ltd., Ddltnla  Nagar,  Bihar  , Sahu  Jain  Trust,  9, Aliporc  Park  Place,  Cal.  . Shell  Petroleum  Co.  Ltd.,  C/o  Burma  Shell, Ballard  Estate, Bombay  . . .. Co.
1965-66
)j
Do.
"1
Shell Co. of India Ltd., address as above . Surendra  Overseas Ltd., 153, Canning St., Cal.. United  Collieries Ltd., 25, Brabourne Rd. Cal,  .
1964-65 1961-62
2,18,07,502 15,27,027 27,68,658 15*36,203 351 352 353
[No.  131  (F,  No.  I/2/67-IT(B).]
R.  N. MUTTOO,  Jt. Secy.

CENTRA!,  BOARD  OF  DIRECT  TAXES
INCOMB-TAX
New  Delhi,  the  27th  October  1067
S.0.4070.—In  exercise of rhe powers conferred  by  Section  126  of  the  Income-tax  Act,  1961 (43 of IO6I)J  ihc-Ceniral Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following  addition  to  the  Sche- dule annexed  to its  Notification  No.  i(F.  No.  55/233/63-IT)  dated  the  18th  May,  1964  :—
Afler  LS. NO.  41 in the said Schedule, the following item  shall be added  :—
Income  Tax
Persons
Appellate Commissio-
Officer
ner  of s. No.
Inspecting Assistant Commissio-
Income-tax
ner  of
Income-tax
Assistant Commissio- ner  of Income-tax
2
1
3
6
4
5
43.  (A)
Appellate  Commis- Assistant  sioner  of 1- Commission-  Income-tftij er  of  West Bengal :  Income-tax  II, Calcutta.
who  has
Income Tax Officer, 'A'  Ward, Railways  & Miscellane- ous Salaries Circle, Cal- cutta.
a-  been Invested with powers to hear ap-
f  peals against tile decision of the Income
lis-Tax  Officer
referred to in
{  Column 3.
Employees  of  (i)  Eastern  Rly. under the audit control of F.A. & C.A.O. Eastern Railway, Calcutta, (ii)  Railway  Electrification under the audit control of F.A. & CA.O.  Rly. Electrification,  Cal- cutua, and (iil) Chittaranian Loco- motive  Worlcs  under  the  audit control  of  F.A.  & C.A.O.  Chit- taranjan  Locomotive  Works, Chittaranjan  whose salary during the  previous  year  exceeded  the maximum amount not chargeable to  Inwme-tax  under  the law  for the  time  being in  force  or  being less  than  that  amount,  has  for some  reason  been  subjected  to deduction of tax at source.
s 1-
Inspecting Assistant Commissic ner  of Income-taj who  has been appoii ted to per- form  the functions 0: an  Inspect ing Assis- tant Comix sioner of Income-ta] in respect of Railway and  Misce lancous Salaries Circle, Calcutta.

4 3 O 6 T HE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  ,8,  I967/KARTXK,  „  I o on  .  . ._
•;
1  •  2
3
4
6
5
1
——————^_
Commssio-
ner  of -  Income
Tax, West i  Bengal-IJ, Calcutta.
t-
\  Appellate Assistant -  Commissio- ner  of Income Ta: who  has been inves; ed with i  powers to
:
i
(B)  Employees  under  the audit  contn al  Income-taj of  the  Controller  of  Defenc :e  O5i;er, Accounts  (Factories),  Caloat ta  'B' Ward, including  employees  of  th :e  Railways  & Office  of  the  Controller  of  D( s-  Miscel- fence  Accounts  (Factories)  Ca: l-  laneous cutta  wh ise annual salary  durin >g  Salaries the  previous  year  exceeded  th e  Circle, maximum amount not chargeab] Le  Calcutta. to  income-tax  under  the  law  fo: r the  time  being  in  force  or  being less  than  that  amount  have  foi some  reasons  been  subjected  to deduction  of tax at  source.
hear appeali s against the decision of the  Income Tax Officer referred to in Column
3-
(
t  Inspecting A3sistmt CornmissiO' ner  of Income-tax who has been ap- pointed  to perform th< functions  of an  Inspect- ing Ass s- tant  Com- missioner of Income Tax in respect of Railways and Miscel" 1 laneous ( salaries circle, Calcutta.
c
(C
-do-
-do-
do- )  (i)  Employees  and  pensioners  of Post  and  Telegraph  Department under  the  audit  control  of  the Director  General, Pay & Accounts, Posts & Telegraphs,  Calcutta.
.  j
C
Income-tax Officer, 'C  Ward, Railways Miscel- laneous Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
-do-
-do-
(ii)
-do-
-do- Pensioners  whose  pensions  are payable  from  Defence  Service Estimates through the  Controller of Military Accounts & Pensions, Allahabad,  who  reside  in  West Bengal.
-do-
-do-
(iii)
-do-
-do- Staff  Artists,  Producers  and  em- ployees  of  All  India  Radio,  Cal- cutta  whose  annual  salary  or pension  during the previous year exceeded  the  maximum  amount not  chargeable  to  income-tax under  the  law for  the  time  being in  force  or  being  less  than  that amount  have  for  some  reasons been  subjected  to  deduction  of •tex-ftt sour-ce.

SM  S"  INDIA:  XOVtMftER  18,  lBB7/KARTTltA  27,  1389  4 3 0^
J
2
6
3
5
4
Employees of South Eastern Rail-' way under the  audit control of F.A. & C.A.  0.  of  South  East- tern  Rly. Calcutta  and  F.A. & C.A.O. Construction Bllaspur.
Gazetted  and Non-gazetted  em-
(U)
Commis- sioner  of Income Tax, West Bengel-II, Calcutta.
Income Tax Officer, D-Ward, Railways and  Miscel- laneous Salaries Circle, '  Calcutta.
ployees of the Overseas  Commu- nication  Services  under  the audit  control  of  Accountant General,  Bombay,  who  arc posted  in  Calcutta—whose salary during the previous year exceeded  the maximum  amount not  chargeable  to  income-tax under  the  law  for  the  time being  in  force  or  being  less than  that  amouni  has for  some reason  been  subjected  to  de- duction of tax at source.
Inspecting Assistant Commissio- ner of Income-tax who has been  ap- pointed  to perform  the functions  of an  Inspect- ing Assist- ant  Commis sioner ot Income-tax
Appellate Assistant Commissio- ner of Income-tax who h"s been  invest- ed with powers to hear appeals against the decision of •  the  Income Tax  Officer referred  to in  Column 3-
in  respect of  Railways and  Miscel- laneous Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
B.
-do-
-do-
Commis- sioner  of Income Tax, West Bengal  I, Cdcutta.
Income TEX Officer, 'B* Ward, Central Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
All Gazetted and  Non-gazetted employees  of  the  Govt.  of  West Bengal  excluding  those  spedfi- i'cally  assigned  to  any  other Income-tax  Officer  by  this  noti- fication,  whose  annual  salary during  the  previous  year  excee- ded  the  maximum  amount  not chargeable  to  income-tax  under the  law  for  the  time  being  in force  or  being  less  than  that amount has for some reasons beei subjected  to  deduction  of  tax at source.
1 All  Gazetted  and  Non-gazetted "
F.(i
employees of the Central  Gov- ernment posted in West Bengal and are under the audit control of A.G., West  Bengal.
(li) All Gazetted  Officers  of the  Edu- cation  Deptt.  of  the  Govt.  of West Bengal.
Commis- sioner of Income-tax, West  Bengal I,  Calcutta.
(iiO
1
Income Tax Officer, 'B'  Ward, Central Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
Appellate Assistant Commis* Bioner of Income-tax who  has been  investec wiih  powers to hear  ap- peals  against the decision
Inspecting Assistant Commis- sioner of Income-tax who has been  ap" poimea  to perform  the functions  of an  Inspect- ing Asatt.
All  Gazetted  and  non-gazetted employees  of  the  Govt.  of West  Bengal receiving their pay and  allowances  from  the Dis- trict  Treasuries  or  Sub- Treasuries  of  24-Parganas, Howrah and Jalpaiguri.

4308  -  , GA  . TE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PABT  H^
2
I
6
3
5
4
A11 Govt.  pensioners  under  the
  audit  control  of  A.G.,  West
   Bengal  whose  surnames  begin                    Commis-       of the
   with  any  of  the  alphabetical                  sioner of     In come
   letters A to L (both inclusive)—                  Income-tan:   Tax  Officer
   whose  annual  salary  of  pen-                   in respect    referred  to
   sions during  ihe previous  year                  of Centrul    in  Column
   exceeded     the     maximum                      Salaries      3-
   amount  not  chargeable  to  in-                  Circle,
   come tax under the law for  the                   Calcutta.
   time  being  in  force  or  being
   less  than  that  amount  has  for
   some reason  been  subjected  to
   deduction of tax at source.

G.(i)
All  Gwetted  and  Non-gazetted ^ employee,  ui  Medical  and Public  Health  Dcplls.  of  the Govt. of West  Bengal.
00
Income Tax Officer, 'C  Waid, Central Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
(iii)
All  gazetted  and  non-gazetted employees  of  the  Govt.  of West  fiengal  who  draw  Ihcir pay  and  emoluments  from  the District  or  Sub-Treasuries in  the  State  of  West  Bengal other  than  the  District  Trea- suries  of  24-Parganus,  Howrah &  Jalpaiguri  &  the  Sub- Treasuries of the  said  Districts. All  Govt.  pensioners  under  the audit  control  of  the  A.G.,  Wesi Bengal  whose  surnames  begin with  nnv  of  the  alphabetical letters  M  to  Z (both  inclusive)— whose  annual  salary  during  the previous year exceeded the maxi- mum  am  mnt  not  chargeable  to income-tax  under  the  law  for the  time  being  in  force  or  being less  than  that  amount  has  for some  reasons  been  subjected  to deduction of tax at source,
Comts- sioner  of Income Tax, West Bengal  Ij Calcutta.
Appellate Assistant Commis- sioner of Income-tax who has been  in- vested  with powers to hear appeals agiinsl  the . decision of the  Income Tax  Officer referred  to in  Column 3-
Inspecting Assistant Commis- sioner of Income-tax who has been ap- pointed  to perform  the functions of an  Ins- pecting A.sstt Commis- sioner  in reipccc  of Central Salaries Circle, Calcutta.
Provided  that  this  mtifiouion  will not  be applicable to Doctors  in the  employment  of  the
Government  of  West  Bengal  who  arc  posted  outsiJe  the  city  of  Calcutta.
This  notification  shall  take  effect  from  the  6th  November,  1967.
No.  i3(P.  Ns. 55/50/66-ITCAII)].
A. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, Under Secy.
INCOME-TAX
New  Delhi,  the  3rd  November  1967
 
S.O.  4071.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  Sub-Section  (1)  of  Sec- tion  122  of  the  Income-tax  Act,  1091  (43  of  1981)  and  of  all  other  powers  enabling it  in  that  behalf,  the  Central  Board  of  Direct  Taxes  hereby  makes  the  following

amendment  In  the  schedule  appended  to  its  notification  No.  68  (F.  No.  50/88/67- ITJ),  dated  9th  August,  1987,  namely:
Against  Poona  Range  n.  Poona  under  column  2  the  following  shall  he added:
14.  Income-tax  Officer,  Additional  C-Ward,  Poona.
Explanatory  Note
The  amendment  has  become  necessary  on  account  of  the  creation  of  a  new charge  in  the  Commissioner's  charge.
(This  note  does  not  form  part  of  the  notification  but  is  intended  to  be  merely clariflcatory).
[No.  147  (F.  No.  50/88/07-ITJ).]
New  Delhi,  tlie  4th  November  1967
S.O.  4072—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-section  (1)  of  sec- tion  122  of  the  Income-tax  Act,  1961  (43  of  1961)  and  of  all  other  powers  enabl- ing  it  in  that  behalf,  the  Central  Board  of  Direct  Taxes  hereby  makes  the  fol- lowing  further  amendments  In  the  Schedule  appended  to  its  notification  No.  12- Income-tax  (F.  No.  50/7/66-ITJ),  dated  the  14th  January,  1966,  namely:
I.  Against  F-Range,  Calcutta  under  column  2 the  following  shall  be  substituted: 1.  District  1(1),  Calcutla  (appeal  cases  pending  and  which  will  be  arising in  A-Ward  to  E-Ward  of  the  District).
2.  Special  Survey  Circle  VII,  Calcutta.
II.  Against  G-Range,  Calcutta  under  column  2  the  following  shall  be  added:
4.  District  IIK3),  Calcutta,
III.  Against  L-Range,  Calcutta  under  column  2  the  following  shall  be  substi- tuted:
1.  District  1(1)  Calcutta  (appeal  cases  pending  and  which  will  be  arising in  wards  other  than  A-Ward  to  E-Ward  of  the  District).
2.  Special  Survey  Circle  II,  Calcutta.
IV.  Against  J-Range,  Calcutta  under  Column  2 the  following  shall  be  substitut- ed:
1.  District  IV(1)  Calcutta. 2.  Special  Survey  Circle  VI,  Calcutta. 3.  Railways  &  Miscellaneous  Salaries  Circle,  Calcutta. 4.  Central  Salaries  Circle,  Calcutta. 5.  District  III  A,  Calcutta. 0.  Refund  Circle,  Calcutta. 7.  District.  VA,  Calcutta.
This  notification  shall  take  effect  from  10th  November,  1967.
Explanatory  Note
The  amendments  have  become  necessary  on  account  of  the  reallocation  of  the- workload  amongst  the  Appellate  Assistant  Commissioners,  F-Range,  G-Range,  J- Range  and  L-Range,  Calcutta.
(The  above  note  does  not  form  part  of  the  notification,  but  is  intended  to b& merely  clariflcatory).
[NO.  148  (F.  No.  50/76/67-ITJ).] P.  G,  GANDHI,  Under  Secy.
MINISTRY  OF  PETROLEUM  AND  CHEMICALS
New  Delhi,  the  6th  November  1967
 
SO-  4073.—In  pursuance  of  clause  (a)  of  section  2  of  the  Petroleum  Pipelines (Acquisition  of  Right  of  User  in  Land)  Act,  1962  (50  of  1962),  the  Central  Gov- ernment  hereby  authorises  the  authority  mentioned  in  column  (1)  of  the  schedule-

b"law  to  perform  thg  functions  of  the  competent  authority  under  tha  aai4  * ft •within  the  limits  of  the  State  mentioned  in  the  corresponding  entry  in  column  (t) of  the  said  schedule.
Authority
Territorial  Jurisdiction
Address
(2)
(3) (i)
Slbsagar,  Assam.
Sub.divisional  Officer
State of Assam.
[No.  20(5)/fl7-Prnd.]
fl.O. 4"74.—Whereas  it  appears  to  the  Central  Government  that  it  Is  necessary In  the  public  interest  that  for  the  transport  of  Petroleum  from  Lakwa  Group Gathering  Station  No.  1  in  Assam  State  to  Moran  oilfield  in  the  State  of  Assam a  pipeline  should  be  laid  by  the  Oil  and  Natural  Gas  Commission  and  that  for the  purpose  of  laying  such  a  pipeline,  it  is  necessary  to  acquire  the  right  of  user In  the  land  described  in  the  Schedule  annexed  hereto:
2-  Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-qectlaa  (1)  Of flection  3  of  the  Petroleum  Pipelines  (Acquisition  of  Right  of  User  in  Land)  Act, 1962  (50  of  1E62)  the  Central  Government  hereby  declares  its  intention  to  acquire the  right  of  user  therein.
3.  Any  person  interested  in  the  said  land  may,  within  21  days  from  the  date Of  this  notification,  object  to  the  laying  of  the  pipelines  under  the  land  to  the competent  authority.  Every  person  making  such  an  objection  shall  also  state specifically  whether  he  wishes  to  be  heard  in  person  or  by  a  legal  practitioner.
SCHEDULE
Sub-division
District
MOUZA
VILLAGE/AREAS
Sibsagar
Khalal  Ghogora
Do.  . Do.  . Do.  . Do.  . Do.  . Mahmora  .
Khalai  Ghogora
Do.  . Do.  . Do.  . Do.  .
Mahmora
Khalai  Ghogora
Do.  . Do.  . Do.  . Do,  .
Mahmora
Sibsagar  .                                               Moran  Changmai
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Moran  Gaon
    Do.   .             Do.  ,                            Boruahola
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Domardolong tea  garden
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Kakarmora  pathar
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Duba tea garden
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Kachu  pathar
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Tiphuk  Habi
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Namani gaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Kathkata  Changmai
    Do.   ,             Do.  .                            Ujani  Changmai
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Leicheng gaon
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Mohan deodhai gaon
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Kharaghoria  dobba
    Do.   .             Do.  .                            Deodhai gaon
    D o.  .             Do.  .                            Mohonde odhai gaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Kamcswar  pathar
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Mohondeohai
    Do.   .            Do.  .                             Dhemaji  bill
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .       Jamuguri Bill
    Do.   .            Do.  .        Shila Kuti   .       Goji bill
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Khanagaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Veloguri gaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Nara  gaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Kani bill
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Bongali gaon
    Do.   .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Sola pather
   Do.    .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Garamurh bill
   Do.    .            Do.  .               Do.  .        Lakwa tea garden

[No.  20(5)/67-II-Prod.]
 
B.  S.  S.  RAO,  Under  Secy-

3ma>  HXfl  THE  GAZITTI  OF  A;  . ! " , ..
WNI&TRY  OF  TRANSPORT  AND  8HIPPING
(Transport  Wing)
New  Delhi,  the  31st  October  1967
S.O-  4075.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  3  of  the  Jayanti Shipping  Company  (Taking  over  of  Management)  Act,  l!<66  (24  of  1966),  the Central  Government  hereby  appoints  Shri  P.  C.  Bhattacharyya,  Government Director  on  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Indian  Shipping  Companies,  Bombay,  to be  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Control  appointed  under  the  said  Act,  from  the 9th  October,  1967  vice  Shri  Y.  N-  Sukthankar,  resigned,  and  makes  the  following farther  amendment  in  the  notification  of  the  Government  of  India  in  the  Miniatry of  Transport  and  Aviation,  Department  of  Transport,  Shipping  and  Tourism (Transport  Wing)  No.  S.  O.  1781,  dated  the  10th  June,  1966,  namely:
In  the  said  notification  for  the  entry  against  Serial  No.  4,  the  following  entry shall  be  substituted,  namely :—
"Shri  P.  C.  Bhattacharyya,  Government  Director  on  the  Board  of  Directors of  the  Indian  Shipping  Companies."
[No.  32-MD(22)/67J
B.  P.  SRIVASTAVA,  Dy.  Secy.
(Transport  Winy)
New  Delhi,  the  6th  November  1967
8-0.  4076-—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-rule  (2)  of  rule  9,  clauBe (b)  of  sub-rule  (2)  of  rule  12,  and  clause  (ii)  of  sub-rule  (1)  of  rule  24,  of  the Central  Civil  Services  (Classification,  Control  and  Appeal)  Rules  1965,  the  Presi- dent  hereby  directs  that  the  following  amendments  shall  be  mnde  in  the  notifica- tion  of  the  late  Ministry  of  Transport  No.  SRO  610,  dated  the  28th  February  1957, *'  ' namely:—
In  the  Schedule  to  the  said  notification,  under  Part  II—General  Central Service  Class  III  and  part  III—General  Central  Service  Class  IV,  for the  sub-heading  "Regional  Sailing  Vessels  Organisation,  Bombay/ Madras/Masulipatnam  '  in  column  1,  the  sub-heading  "Regional Office  (Sails)  Jamnagar/Bombay/Tuticorin/Masulipatnam",  shall  be substituted,  and  for  the  entries  in  column  (2)  and  (3)  under  the  sub- heading  as  so  substituted,  the  following  entry  shall  be  substituted, namely:
"Deputy  Director  General  of  Shipping  (Sailing  Vessels),  Directorate General  of  Shipping,  Bombay."
[No.  3£>-MD(25)/8T]
JASWANT  SINGH,  Under  Secy.
(Transport  Wing)
MERCHANT  SHIPPING
New  Delhi,  the  9th  November  1967
 
8.0.  407X—In  pursuance  of  clause  (a)  of  sub-section  (1)  of  section  283  of  the Merchant  Shipping  Act,  1958  (44  of  1958),  the  Central  Government  hereby declares  that  the  Government  of  the  Republic  of  Nicaragua  has  accepted  the Safety  Convention  as  defined  in  clause  (37)  of  section  3  of  the  said  Act  that ia  to  aay,  the  Convention  for  the  Safety  of  Life  at  Sea  signed  in  London  on  the

,  ''.  .  £  .  L: .  ( 'EMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART  I I-
seventeenth  day  of  June  nineteen  hundred  and  sixty,  as  amended  from  time  to time.
[No.  F.46-MA(10)/86.]
B.  B.  LAL,  Under  Secy.
MINISTRY  OF  TOURISM  AND  CIVIL  AVIATION
New  Delhi,  the  8th  November  1967
S-O.  4078.—Whereas  by  resolution  No.  20-AC(9)/67  dated  8tb  November,  1987, of  the  Government  of  India  in  the  Ministry  of  Tourism  and  Civil  Aviation,  Shrl S.  N.  Guha  Boy  has  been  appointed  by  Government  as  a  one-man  Committee  to undertake  Job  evaluation  of  certain  categories  of  employees  of  the  two  Air  Cor- porations—Indian  Airlines  and  Air-India;
And  whereas  the  Central  Government  Is  of  the  opinion  that,  having  regard to  the  nature  of  the  inquiry  to  be  made  and  other  circumstances  ot  the  case,  all the  provisions  of  the  Commissions  of  Inquiry  Act,  1952  (60  of  1952)  including  the provisions  of  sub-sections  (2),  (3),  (4)  and  (5)  of  section  3,  should  be  made applicable  to  the  aforesaid  authority;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  11  of  the  said Act,  the  Central  Government  hereby  directs  that  all  the  provisions  of  the  said  Act Including  the  provisions  of  sub-sections  (2),  (3),  (4)  and  (5)  of  section  5  shall apply  to  that  authority.
[No.  20-AC(9)/67.]
R.  C.  DUTT,  Secy-
MINISTRY  OF  INDUSTRIAL  DEVELOPMENT  &  COMPANY  AFFAIRS
(Department  of  Industrial  Development)
ORDER
New  Delhi,  the  8th  November  1967
S.O.  4079./D3RA/8/11/67.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  Section  6 Ol the  Industries  (Development  and  Regulation)  Act,  U'51  (65  of  1951)  read  with rules  5(1)  and  8  of  the  Development  Councils  (Procedural)  Rules,  1952,  thft Centra]  Government  hereby  appoints,  till  the  11th  December,  1968,  Dr.  D.  N. Daruvalla,  Sarvashri  R.  N.  Sharma  and  K.  V.  Surendra  Nath  to  be  members  of the  Development  Council  established  by  the  Order  of  the  Government  of  India in  the  late  Ministry  of  Industry's  Order  No.  S.O.  IDRA/6/2/66,  dated  the  12th December,  1S6R,  for  the  scheduled  industries  engaged  in  the  manufacture  or production  of  Inorganic  Chemicals  and  directs  that  the  following  amendments shall  be  made  in  the  said  Order,  namely:—
I.  In  the  said  Order,  for  the  entry  No.  6 relating  to  Shri  O.  P.  Kharbanda,  the following  entry  shall  be  substituted,  namely:—
"6.  Dr.  D.  N.  Daruvalla,  Divisional  Manager,  Chemical  Plan  Division,  Larsen and  Toubro  Ltd.,  Ballard  Estate,  Bombay-1."
II.  In  the  said  Order,  alter  entry  No.  26  relating  to  Shri  K.  D.  Jain,  the following  entries  shall  be  inserted,  namely;—
"27.  Shrl  R.  N.  Sharma,  Polytechnic  Road,  Dhanbad.
28.  Shri  K.  V.  Surendranath,  President,  Titanium  Products  Employees' Union,  C/o,  Kerala  State  Trade  Union  Congress,  Panavila  Junction, Trivandrum,  Kerala  State."
[No.  2(3)/Dev.  Councll/85-LC.]
R.  C.  SETHI,  Under  Seey.

SEC.  ,•(!!)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  4 3 I3
(Department  of  Induitrial  Development)
(Indian Standard* Institution)
New  Delhi,  the  31st  October  1967
S.O.  4080.—-In  pursuance  of  sub-regulations  (2) and (3) of  regulation  3 of the  Indian Standards  Institution  (Certification  Marks)  Regulations, 195s.,  the  Indian  Standards  Institution hereby nntifies  that the Indian  Standard!" 3), particulars of which are  given in'the  Schedule  hereto, annexed, have been established  during the period  1 to 31 October 1967:
THE  SCHEDULE
No. und Title of the Indian SI. No. Standard  Established Brief Particulars
1
No. and Title of the Indian Standard or Standards, If an} superseded by the new Ind iat
Standard
'.'2l
( 1)
1 IS  : 6-1967 Specification for moderate  heat  duty  fire- clay  refractories,  Group 'A' (third revision).
(4)
(3)
IS  : 6-19^8 Specification for moderate  heat  duty  fire- clay  refractories,  Group 'A' (second revision).
This  standard  covcis  the requirements  for  moderate heat  duty  burnt  fireclay refractories,  Group  "A* ior  general  pur poses  (Price Rs. 2-00).
IS  : 170-1950  Specification
IS  : 170-1966  Specification 2
for  acetone (first revision). for  acetone.
3
This  standard  prescribes  the requirements  and  methods of  sampling  and  test  for acetone  (Price  Rs,  5-00).
IS  :  204-1961  Specification for  tower bolts (revisecT).
IS  : 204-1966  Specification for  tower  bolts (second revision).
4 IS  : 802 (Part  D-1967 Code of practice for use of struc- tural  steel  in  over-head transmission-line  • towers Part  I  loads  an  permis- sible  stresses.
5 IS  : 1387-1967  General re- quirements for the supply of metallurgical  materials (first revision).
This  standard  lays  down  the requirements  for tower  bolts (Price Rs. 6-oo).
This  code stipulates the  various design  considerations  to be adopted  in  the  design  of transmission-line  towers  for overhead  transmission  lines of  voltage  66 kV and  above and  covers  loads,  combina- tion  of  loads,  and  a  few design details and permissible stresses  in  axial  compression (Price Rs. 5 50).
IS  :  1387-1959  General  re- quirements for the supply of metals  and metal pro- ducts.
6 IS  1448 Indian  Standard methods of test for petro- leum  products.
This  standard  covers  the general  requirements  for the  supply  of  metallurgical materials  including  raw materials  for  metallurgica industries  and  finished  meta products  conforming  to Indian  Standard  specifica- tions  (Price  Rs.  2-00).
This  standard  prescribes  the methods  of  test  which  are common  to  several  Indian Standard  specification for  individual petroleum pro- ducts  and  lubricants.
(0  IS  :  1448 (Part  Ij-1960 Methods  of  test  (No. P: 11, P; 12, P: 16, P:  IS, P 28; P: 33, P: 3 4 ^ : 4 0, P:  41 and P: 42) for  pe- troleum and its products.
 
(Note  —This  standard  at present  contains  four parts consisting a number  of  teat

3 14  -  •  oi  " • •'  -v.
(?)
!•'.  i*.  •-.  —
(3)
CD
(4)
(ii)  IS  : 1448 (Part  I I H 9 62 Method of test (No. P: 43) for petroleum and its pro- ducts.
7
IS  : 1851-1966 Specification for  single  operator  type arc  welding  transformers (first revision).
methods.  With  a  view  to avoid  revision  of  an  entire part  of  the  standard  which may  be  necessitated  due  to revision  of  an  individual method  of  test,  it  has  now been  decided  to  convert this  standard  in  loose-leaf form  binder.  The  present compilation  includes  six new methods  namely,  P:  6o:  P: 61,  P:  62, P;  64,  P:  65  and P:  68  and  first  revisions of eleven  existing  methods  as mentioned  in  col.  2)  Price— For  Binder  Rs.  7-00.
For  only  the  first  viii >: 2 rages  Rs.  3.50  (Individual methods  are  priced  separa- tely also)..
IS:  1851 (Partl)-I96i  Spe- cification  for  arc  welding transformers Part  I single operator type.
*IS  :  1S75-1966  Specifica- tion  for  carbon  steel billets,  blooms  and  slubs for  forgings (revised).
This  standard  lays  down  the requirements  and  test  for air-cooled  and  oil-coiled  arc welding  equipment  of  the single  operator  transformer type,  for  manual,  semi- automatic  and  automatic welding  (Price  Rs.  3-00).
*IS:  1875-1961  Specifica- tion for  carbon steel bars, billets,  blooms  and  slabs for  forgings.
9 IS  :  i8H5  (Part  III/Scc  6)- 1967  Klectrotechnical vo- cabulary  Part III  acoustic :s Section  6  acoustical  instru- ments.
10 IS  : 2271-1967 Recommend- ed  method  for  -epectro- graphic  analysis  of  plati- num.
IS  :  2974  (Part  III)-I967 ii
Code of practice for design and  construction  of  ma- chine foundations Part  III foundations  for  rotary type machines  (reinforced concrete  foundations  for steam  turbo  generators) This  standard  covers  the  re- quirements  for  six  grades  of carbon  steel  billets,  blooms and  slabs  for  forgings  desig- nated  as  Class  1,  Class  2, Class  3,  Class  3A,  Class  4 and  Class  5  respectively (Price  Rs.  2 '50).
This  standard  covers  terms relating  to  acoustical  instru- ments (Price Rs.  2-50).
This  standard  recommends spectrographic  method  for determining  impurities  111 various  grades  ol"  platinum ranging  from  tjQ-oo  10 99-99  percent  purity (Price  Rs. 2'50).
This  standard  deals  with  the design  of  loundations,  such as  frame  foundations  and other  similar  supported  con- struction  of  reinforced  con- crete  for  the  installation  of steam  turbo  generators  of speeds  1000 rev/min  or  more (Price Rs.  6-00).
*Note  —IS  : 1875-1966 shall  come  Into force  with  effect  from  1 October  1967.  A  separate specification  for  carbon  steel  bars  for  forgings  is  under  preparation.  As  suchj  IS  :  1875-1961 shall  remain  in  force  concurrently  with  IS  :  1875-1966  till  31  December  1967.

S E C.
! ) (I
]  T HE
G .v
,  •
,
L:
.
,
.,
.  1 8,
.
•  j
.  A  *„  4 £ *5
(4)
( I)
(3)
GO
••
IS  :  3156  (Part  IV)-I967 Specification  for  voltage
transformers.
Part  IV  capacitor  voltage
transformers.
This  standard  covers  special requirements  and  tests  for capacitor  voltage  transfor- mers intended to be connect- ed  between  line  and  earth (Price Rs. 4'00).
w  m
13 IS  :  3574  (Part  ID-1966 Specification  for  organic pigments.
Part  II  phthalocyanines.
Thi3  standard  prescribes  the requirements and the methods of  sampling  and  test for  phthalocyanine  pigments used  in  paints  and  allied industries.
This  specification  covers  the requirements  of  both  phtha- locyanine  blue  and  phtha- locyanine  green  pigments (Price  Rs, 3 • 50).
14 IS  :  3699  (P"t  II)-i967 Code for  the  transport  of monkeys by  land.
This  Code  prescribes  condi- tions  for  the  transport  of monkeys  from: (a)  one  rail-head  to  the Part  II  transport  from  rail-
othcrj
head to the nearest  airport,
(6)  railway  station  to  the exporters' compound, and (c) exporters'  cumpound  to
the  airport. (Price Rs. 2-00),
1  #
IS  :  3514-1967  Code  nf
15
This  code  covers  selection  of starters  for  use  with  3-phase ac  induction  motors  covered by  IS  :  1S22-1967  (Price Rs.  12-50).
praclice for selection of  ac induction  motor  starters (voltage  not  exceeding 1000 volts).
16 IS  :  4078-1967  Code  of practice  for  indexing  and storage  if  drill cores.
This  standard  lays  down  re- commendations  for  indexing and  storage  of  cores obtained  by  drilling  and cuttings,  and  special samples  that  may  be recovered  during  the  dril- ling  operation  (Price  Rs. 2-50).
1L7
IS  : 4101 (Part IV1967 Code of  practice  for  external facings  and veneers.
Part  I  stone  facing.
This  standard  covers  fixing  of stone  facing  and  veneering on  the  exterior  of  walls (Price Rs. 6-00).
18 IS  :  4127-T967  Code  of practice for laying of  glazed stoneware pipes.
This  standard  covers  the methods  of  laying  glazed stoneware  pipes  below ground  level  for  drainage purposes.  It  also  includes handling  and  jointing  of pipes,  tests,  backfilling,  re- storation  of  surfaces  (Price Rs.  6'5O).
•  •
IS  : 4140-1967  Specification for  limestone  for  uae  in foundries.
This  standard  covers  the  re- quirements  for  limestone  for use  in  foundries  (Price Rs. 2' 00).

4316  .  .  GJ  ,  , '  L;  .  .  ,  . */,  .  I*.  u.—
(4) ( I)
(2)
(3)20
••
IS  :4i4i-i967  Specification for table tennis rackets.
 This  standard  lays  down  the material,  dimensional  and constructional  requirements of  table  tennis  racket* (Price  Rs. 2- 50),
21 IS  :  4147-1967  Method  of measurements on conven- tional receiving electronic valves.
This  standard  deals  with  the methods  of  measurements  of the  important  characteristics of  electronic  valves  of  the receiving  type  (Price  Rs. 9-50).
22
• •
IS  :4i5o-T967  Specification for  potassium  chloride, technical.
This  standard  prescribes  the requirements  and  the  me- thods  of  sampling  and  test for  potassium  chloridcj technical  (Price  Rs.  5-50).
IS  : 4155-1966  Glossary  of
23
>•
terms redating to chemical and radiation nazards  and hazardous  chemicals.
This  standard  defines  technical terms  relating  to  chemical end  radiation  hazards  and hazardous  chemicals  (Price Rs.  TOO).
24 IS  :4i57(PartI)-i967Code for  the  transport  of  live- stock.
This  code  prescribes  the  con- ditions  for  the  transport  of equines  (horses,  mules  and donkeys)  by  rail,  road  and sea  (Price  Rs .  2 • 50).
Part  I  transport  of  equines (horseSj  mules  and  don- keys)  by  railj  road  and sea.
IS  :4i62-i967  Specification for  graduated  pipettes.
This  standard  prescribes  the requirements  and  the  me- thods  of  sampling  and  tests for  range  of graduated  pipet- tes,  available  for  general laborarory  purposes  (Price
Rs.  5'oo).
This  standard  lays  down  the 26  : IS  : 4166-1967 Methods for sampling of ilmenite and rutile.
procedure  to  be  followed  in collecting  and  preparing samples  from  a  lot  in  order to  determine  ore sizes, mois- ture  content  and  the  chemi- cal  composition  of  ilmenite and rutile  (Price Rs. 4- 00).
IS  :4i6S-i967 Method  for
27
wrapping test of  aluminium and aluminium alloy wire.
This  standard  prescribes  the method for conducting wrap- ping  test  of  aluminium  and aluminium  alloy  wire (Price  Rs. 1-50).
IS:  4173-1967  Specifica-
28
tion  for  4  -mclhylamino- phenol sulphate.
This  standard  prescribes, the  requirements  and the  methods  of  sampling and  test  for  4  -mctnyla- minophcnol  sulphate  used for  processing  photo- graphic  materials  (,Price Rs.  5-00).

SE
( I)
(4)
(3)
>  ( 2)
1  18:4.17^-1967  Specification for  correcting  fluid.
30 IS:;i77-TQf)7  Method  for flattening  test  of  alumi- nium  and  aluminium alloy rubes.
31 IS:4i8i-T9<57  Specification for  feed  fork for  sewing machines  for  household purposes.
32 TS:4T82-I9''I7  Specification
for  misch  metal.
33 IS:4iS8-i967  Specification for  oscillating  shafts for sewing  machines  for household  purposes.
34 IS:4i92-io&7  Sp^oili cation for  aluminium  farm  milk cooling  tanks.
13:4103-1907  Specification 35
for  guar  meal as livestock feed.
36 13:4195-1967  Specification for wheat  seed for propa- gation  purposes.
IS :4I99- r9;i7  Specification il
for  liquid  Soap.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  and  the methods  of  sampling and test  for  correcting  flu'd used  for  carrying  out corrections  on waxless  sten- cil papers (Price  Rs.  2 '50). This  standard  prescribes rhe  method  for  conducting flattening  test  of  alumi- nium  and aluminium alloy circular  tubes.  Individual material  specification may specify  the  maximum diameter  and  thickness  of tubes  to  which  this  test is  to be applied  (Price Rs. 2-00).
This  standard  specifics the rcquiremenls  for  three types  of  feed  forks  for sewing  machines  for house- hold  purposes  (Price Rs. 3 • so).
This  standard  covers  the requirements  of  misch metal  used  in  ferrous •ind  non-ferrous  industry (.Price  Rs.  2-Qo1).
This  standard  specifies  the requirements  for  two types of  oscillating  shafts  for sewing  machines  for house- hold  purposes  (Price Rs. 2-50).
This  standard  lays  down requirements  of  design, construction  and  perfor- mance  for  aluminium fjrm  milk  cooling  tanks in  which  bulk  milk  is cooled  and  stored  (Price Rs,  S'5o).
This  standard  prescribes the  rcquiremenls  and the methods  of  sampling and test  for  guar  meal  to be used  as  livestock  feed (Piice  Rs. 2-oo),
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  and  the methods  01  sampling and test  for wheat (1'riiiatm spp.) seed  for  propagation pur- poses  (Price  Rs, 2-00).
This  standard  prescribes the requirements  and methods of  sampling  and test  for liquid  soap  for  general purposes  (Price  Rs. 2-00).

4 3 i8  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1907/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART I I-
( 2)
(3) ( I)
38  1
[8:4203-1967  Method for determination of  sulphate content  in textile  materials.
IS:42O5-TQ67  Specification 39
for  drafting  stools.
This  standard  prescribes the  methods  for  determina- tion  of watcrsoluble  tul- phale  present  in  textile materials,  and  the  pro- cedure  for extracting the textile  materials  with  water (Price  Rs. 2-501.
 
This  standard  lays  down the- requirements  for materials* sizes,  construction  and finish of  stools  for  use  with drafting  tables  and  re- ference  tables  fPrices Rs.
2-00).
40 IS :42T2-TQ67  Specification for  drafting  tables and reference tables for  draw- ing  offices.
18:4215-1967  Specification 41
for  needle  bearings.
42 IS-.4223^967  Specification for  steel  wire  for  umbrella ribs.
43 IS 14224-1967  Specification for  steel  wire  for  office staples.
44 18:4225-1967  Recommended practice  for  ultrasonic testing  of steel  plates.
This  standard  specifies requirements  for  drafting- tables  for  use  wilh  or without  drawing  boards (Price  Rs.  2-501.
This  standard  covers  the requirements  of  needle roller  bearings  (generally referred  to as needle  bear- ings)  used  for high  radial loads  and  speeds  for t he following  three  types  : (a)  With  inner  ring  (needle roller  set  retained  bet- ween  outer  and  inner ringi  designated  by TSTEA.
(b)  Without  inner  ring " (needle  roller  act re- tained  in  outer  ring only)  designated  by NES.
(c)  Without  outer  ring (needle  roller  set retained  on  inner  ring only)  designated  by NCS.
(Price  Rs.  4-00).
This  standard  covers  t he requirements  for  carbon steel  round  and  flat  wire- used  for  umbrella  ribs (Price  Rs.  2-co).
This  standard  covers  the requirements  of steel  wire used  for  office  staples. The  maximum  size  of wire covered  in  this  standard in  0-315  mm in  diameter (Price  Rs.  2'oo).
This  standard  prescribes the  procedure  for  carrying out  ultrasonic  testing of rolled  carbon  and  alloy steel  plates  (Price  Rs. 2-00).

Six.  3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/XARTIKA  27,  1889  ^jg
(2)
( I)
(3)
(4)
45 18:^2^.6-1967  Code of practice for fire  safety  if industrial biv'vngs:  aluminium po'.v^r  factories
This  standard  lays  down the  essential  rc- qui "ements  for  fire  safety of  factorie-'  in  which  pow- ders  of  aluminium,  mag- nesium  and  their  alloys are mv.itiOictured  and/or stored  (Price  Rs.  5-00).
46 18:4227-1967  Specification for  braided  nylon  cored for  aeronautical  purposes
This  standard  prescribes constructional  details  and other  requirements  of five- varieties  of  braided  nylon cored  generally  used  as suspension  lines  for  various types  of  parachutes  (Price Rs.  3-50).
47
••
18:4228-1967  Specification for  nylon  tapes  for  aero- nautical  purposes.
This  standard  prescribes constructional  details  and other  particulars  of  six varieties  of  nylon  tapes undyed  (Price  Rs.  3-50).
48 IS :4229-i967  Specification for  nylon  sewing  threads for  aeronautical  purposes
This  standard  prescribes constructional  details  and other  particulars  of  four varieties  of  nylon  sewing threads^  undyed  or  dyed used  for  man-dropping parachutes  and  other  aero- nautical  purposes  (Price Rs.  2-50).
IS :4232-i96y  Specification
• •
49
for  turnip.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  and  the methods  of  sampling and  test  for  turnips  (Bras- sicaic  compestris var3  rapa  L) (Price  Rs.  2-50).
IS :4233-i967  Specification
50
for  beets.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  arid  the- methods  of  sampling  and test  for  beets  (Beta vulgans L) (Price  Rs.  2-50).
18:4234-1967  Specification
5i
for  sweet  potato.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  and  the methods  of  sampling  and test  for  sweet  potato (Jpomoea  batatas  Lam), tubers  (Price  Rs.  2-50).
IS :4236-i967  Specification
52
for  glyceryl  monostearate for  cosmetic  industry.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  and  th methods  of  sampling  and test  for  glyceryl  mono- stearate  for  cosmetic  in- dustry.  The  material covered  by  this  standard is  non-self-emulsifying (Price  Rs.  6-00).

43*0  GAZJ  ;  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27.  1889  [PART  I I-
(3)
( 2)
( I)
(4)
18:4238-1967  Specification
••
53
for  sterilized milk.
This  standard  prescribes tho  requirements  and  the methods  of  test  for  sterili- zed  milk  (Price  Rs.  5'CO).
54 18:4339-1967  Specification for  bevel  protractors.
This  standard  covers  the requirements  for  mecha- nical  and  optical  beve protractors  for  general engineering  meaauremenl purposes  (Price  Rs.  3-50)1
55 IS 14241-1967  Specification for  engineers'  parallels.
This  standard  prescribes the  requirements  for precision  parallels  of  the following  types:
(a)  Solid  type* (b) Box  type,  and (cj  Adjustable  type- (Price  Rs.  3-50).
56 15:4242-1967  Method  of measurement  of acoustical noise  emitted  by  ballasts for  gaseous  discharge lamps.
This  standard  prescribes the  method  of  measuring the  noise  emitted  by  ballasts for  gaseous  discharge lamps  such  as  fluorescent lamps,  mercury  vapour lamps  etc.  (Price  Rs.  2  00).
",  9 ° ^?  Indian  Standards  are available, for  sale, with the  Indian  Standards  Institution, Manak  Bhavan, 9 Bahadur  Shah  Zafar  Marg, New Delhi-i and also its branch offices  at  (i) Bombay Mutual  Terrace,  Sandhurst  Bridge,  Bombay-73  (ii)  Third  and  Fourth  Floors,  5  Chowringhce Approach,  Calcutta-13., (m) Second Floor, Sathyamurthi Bhavan, 54 General Patters Road  Madras-2 and  (iv)  117/418B,  Sarvodaya  Nagar,  Kanpur.
[No.  MD/I3I2.]
S.O.  4081.—In  pursuance of  sub-regulation  (1)  of  Regulation  5  of  the  Indian  Standards Institution  (Certification  Marks)  Regulations,  1955,  the  Indian  Standards  Institution  hereby notifies  that  the  Indian Standard, particulars of which  arc given in, the  Schedule  hereafter,  has been cancelled:
THE  SCHEDULE
No. and  Title of the Indian  Standard
Cancelled
SI. No.
No.  and  Date  of  Gazette  Notification  in which establishment of the Indian  Standard WBE notified.
1 IS :44i-i955  Methods  of  Chemical  analysis S.R.O.  3538  dated  n  November  1955, published  in  the  Gazette  of  India,  Part 11, of brasses and bronzes.
Section  3  dated  26  November  1955.
[No.  MD/137.]
DR.  SADGOPAL,
Deputy Director  General.

SEC  3(11)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4321
MINISTRY  OF  FOOD,  AGRICULTURE,  COMMUNITY  DEVELOPMENT  AND
COOPERATION
(Department  of  Agriculture)
New  Delhi,  the  7th  November  1967
S.O.  4082.—The  following  draft  of  certain  rules  further  to  amend  the  Pulses Grading  and  Marking  Rules,  1964,  which  the  Central  Government  proposes  to make,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  3  of  the  Agricultural  Pro- duce  (Grading  and  Marking)  Act,  1937  (1  of  1937)  are  hereby  published,  as required  by  the  said  section,  for  the  information  of  all  persons  likely  to  be  affected thereby  and  notice  is  hereby  given  that  the  said  draft  will  be  taken  into  considera- tion  on  or  after  the  28th  November,  1967.
Any  objections  or  suggestions  which  may  be  received  from  any  person  with respect  to  the  said  draft  before  the  date  aforesaid,  will  be  considered  by  the Central  Government,
Draft  Rules
1.  These  rules  may  be  called  the  Pulses  Grading  and  Marking  (Amendment) Rules,  1967.
2.  In  the  Pulses  Grading  and  Marking  Rules,  1964,
(i)  for  rule  5,  the  following  rule  shall  be  substituted,  namely: —
"5.  Grade  Designation  Mark.-(l)  The  grade  designation  mark  in  the  case  of 4  kg.  and  1 kg.  packings  of  pulses  (whole  or  split)  packed  in  polythene  or  paper bags,  shall  consist  of  a  design  incorporating  the  number  of  the  certificate  of  autho- risation,  the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  grade  of  the  pulses  (whole  or  split)  as approved  by  the  Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser.
(2)  The  grade  designation  mark  in  the  case  of  pulses  (whole  or  split)  packed jn  containers  of  jute  or  cloth  as  also  in  containers  in  which  sealed  polythene  bags of  graded  pulses  (whole  or  split)  are  packed  shall  consist  of  a  label  specifying the  grade  designation  and  bearing  a  design  (consisting  of  an  outline  map  of  India with  the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  figure  of  the  rising  sun  with  Lhe  words  'Produce of  India'  and"fl  'JcTR  ^TTC')  resembling  the  one  as  set  out  in  Schedule  I."'
(ii)  in  rule  6,
(1)  in  sub-rule  (i),  for  the  words  "affixed  to  each  container",  the  words "affixed  to  or  printed  on  each  container"  shall  be  substituted;
(2)  for  sub-rule  (2),  the  following  sub-rule  shall  be  substituted,
namely:—
r'(2)  In  addition  to.  the  grade  designation  mark,  the  following  parti- culars  shall  also  be  clearly  and  indelibly  marked  on  each  con- tainer,  namely  : —
(a)  date  of  packing  in  code  or  plain  letters, (b)  lot  number,  and (c)  net  weight."
(3) in  sab-rule  (3),  for  the  words  "affixed  to  the  container''  the  words
"affixed  to  or  printed  on  the  container"  shall  be  substituted.
(lii)  In  Schedules  II,  IV,  V  and  VI,  under  the  column  "General Characteristics",  for  item  (c)  and  the  entry  relating  thereto,  the following  shall  be  substituted,  namely:—
"(c)  be  sweet,  clean,  wholesome  and  free  from  moulds,  weevils,  obnoxious smell,  discolouration,  admixture  of  deleterious  substances  (includ- ing  added  colouring  matter)  and  all  other  impurities  except  to  the extent  indicated  in  the  Schedule;"
[No.  F.  13-15/67-AM.]

4322  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA ;  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  I8&9  [PART  H-
New  Delhi,  the  8th  November  1967
S.O.  4083.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  ,'f  of  the  Agricultural Produce  (Grading.and  Marking)  Act,  1937  (1  of  19:J7),  the  Central  Government hereby  makes  the  following  rules  further  to  amend  the  Chilli  Powder  Grading and  Marking  Rules,  1964,  the  same  having  been  previously  published  as  required by  the  said  section,  namely:—
RULES
1.  These  rules  may  be  called  the  Chilli  Powder  Grading  and  Marking  (Amend- ment)  Rules,  1967.
2.  In  the  Chilli  Powder  Grading  and  Marking  Rules,  1964,  for  rules  5  End  6, (he  following  rules  shall  be  substituted,  namely:—
"5.  Grade  designation  marks,— (1)  The  grade  designation  marks  in  the  case of  Chilli  Powder  packed  in  Polythene  or  paper  bags  shall  consist  of a  designation  Incorporating  the  number  of  certificate  of  authorisation, the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  ffrade  approved  by  the  Agricultural Marketing  Adviser,
(2)  The  grade  designation  mark  in  the  case  of  Chilli  Powder  packed in  tin  or  glass  containers  shall  consist  of  a  paste-on  label,  specifying the  grade  designation  and  bearing  the  design  of  a  map  of  India  with the  word  'Agmark'.
(3)  The  grade  designation  mark  in  the  case  of  Chilli  Powder  packed  In containers  of  Jute  or  cloth  or  containers  hi  which  sealed  polythene bags  of  graded  chilli  powder  are  packed  shall  consist  of  a  label,  speci- fying  the  grade  designation  and  bearing  the  design  consisting  of  an outline  map  of  India  with  the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  figure  of  rising sun  with  the  words  'Produce  of  India'  and'T;TrffcT  ^T'TTT')  resembling the  one  as  set  out  in  Schedule  I.
(6)  Method  of  Marking.— (1)  The  grade  designation  mark  shall  be  securely affixed  to  or  printed  on  each  container  in  a  manner  approved  by  the Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser-
(2)  In  addition  to  the  above,  the  following  particulars  shall  also  be  clearly
and  indelibly  marked  on  each  container-
(a)  Date  of  packing  in  code  or  plain  letters, _(b)  Lot  number,  and (c)  Net  weight.
(3)  An  authorised  packer  may,  after  obtaining  the  prior  approval  of  the Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser,  mark  his  private  trade  mark  on  a container,  in  a  manner1  approved  by  the  said  Officer;  provided  that the  private  trade  mark  does  not  represent  a  quality  or  srrade  different from  that  Indicated  by  the  grade  designation  mark  affixed  to  the  con- tainer  in  accordance  with  these  rules-"
3.  In  Schedule  II,  under  column  7  "General  Characteristics",  the  following Hentence  appearing  at  the  end  shall  be  omitted,  namely: —
"It  shall  pass  through  a  standard  500  micron  sieve  and  nothing  shall  remain on  the  sieve.
[No-  F.13-23/67-AM.J
S.O. 4084,—In exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  3  of  the  Agricultural ll'roduce  (Grading  and  Marking)  Act,  1937  (1  of  1937),  the  Central  Government hereby  makes  the  following  rules  further  to  amend  the  Ginger  Grading  and  Mark- Ing  Rules,  1964, the  same  having  been  previously  published  as  required  by  the  said (lection,  namely:—
RULES
1-  These  rules  may  be  called  the  Ginger  Grading  and  Marking  (Amendment) Bules,  1967.

StC  8(11)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4323.
2-  In  the  Ginger  Grading  and  Marking  Rules,  1964— (i)  lor  sub-rule  (2)  of  rule  1,  the  following  sub-rule  shall  be  substituted, namely:—
"(2)  They  shall  apply  to  Ginger  (Zingiber  offlcinale)  (whole  or  powder;
produced  in  India."
(ii)  for  rule  3,  the  following  rule  shall  be  substituted,  namely: —
"3.  Grade  Designation.—The  grade  designations  to  indicate  the  quality  of gingei  (whether  whole  or  powdered)  shall  be  as  set  out  In  column  1 of  Schedules  II  to  X";
(iii)  In  rule  4,  for  the  words  and  figures  "Schedules  II  to  IX",  the  words  and flgutes  "Schedules  II  to  X"  shall  be  substituted;
(Iv)  for  rules  5 and  6,  the  following  rules  shall  be  substituted,  namely  ; —
"5.  Grade  Designation  Mark.— (1)  The  grade  designation  mark  in  the  case o±  ginger  (whether  whole  or  powdered)  packed  in  polythene  or  paper bass  shall  consist  oi  a  design  incorporating  the  number  of  the  certi- ficate  of  authorisation,  the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  grade  as  approved by  the  Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser.
(2)  The  gradu  designation  mark  in  the  case  of  ginger  powder  packed  in  tins or  glass  bottles  shall  consist  of  a  paste-on  label  specifying  the  grade designation  and  bearing  the  design  of  map  of  India  with  the  word 'Agmark'.
(3)  The  grade  designation  mark  In  the  case  of  ginger  (whether  whole  or powdered  packed  in  containers  of  jute  or  cloth  as  also  in  containers in  which  sealed  polythene  bags  of  graded  ginger  (whether  whole  or powdered)  are  packed,  shall  consist  of  a  label  speei-fylio:  the  grade designation  and  bearing  a  design  (consisting  of  an  outline  map  of India  with  the  word  'Agmark'  and  the  figure  of  the  rising  sun  with the  words  "Produce  of  India'  and  'STTC'fR1  ^ f lV  resembling  the  one as  set  out  in  Schedule  I-
6.  Methods  of  Marking.— (l)The  grade  designation  mark  shall  be  securely- affixed  to  or  printed  on  each  container  in  a  manner  approved  by  the Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser.
(2)  In  addition  to  the  grade  designation  mark,  the  following  particulars shall  also  be  clearly  and  indelibly  marked  on  each  container,  namely: —
(a)  date  of  packing  in  code  or  plain  letters, (b)  lot  number,  and (c)  net  weight. (3)  An  authorised  packer  may,  after  obtaining  the  prior  approval  of  the Agricultural  Marketing  Adviser,  mark  his  private  trade  mark  on  a container,  in  a  manner  approved  by  the  said  officer,  provided  that the  private  trade  mark  does  not  represent  a  quality  or  grade  differ- ent  from  that  indicated  by  the  grade  designation  mark  affixed  to  or printed  on  the  container  in  accordance  with  these  rules."
(v)  after  Schedule  IX,  the  following  schedule  shall  be  added,  namely:—
SCHEDULE  X
(See  rides 3  and 4)
Grade designation and definition of quality of Ginger Powder
Special  Characteristics
Grade Designation
General Characters-•
tics Moisture % by wt. max.
Water so-
luble  ash
%  by wt.
max
Total  Ash inso-              Gold  Calcium   Alcohol
ash %  luble  fin-           water  (as CaO)   soluble
by wt.   dilute              solu-  %  by wt.  extract
max.    Hen %                ble    Max.      %  bywt.
                             extract          Mia.
        by wt,
                              %  by
         max.                wt. mln

2
8
6
5
4
3
7
9
10,0
2 .0
Standard
1 .0
4.5  1 .  The  Ginger powder  shall be  the  pro- duct obtained • by  grinding the  Ginger (whole).

4324  T H l^  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1987/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PART  I I-
I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2.  It  shall  be free  from  ad- mixture,  from mould  growth, insect,  infes- tation  or musty  odour."
[No.  F.  13-19/67-AM]
E.  K.  BALASUNDARAM,  Under  Secy.
(Department  of  Cooperation)
New  Delhi,  the  3rd  November  1967
S.O.  4085.—Shrl  S.  S.  Puri,  Joint  Secretary  in  the  Ministry  of  Food,  Agricul- ture,  Community  Development  and  Cooperation  (Department  of  Cooperation), Telinquished  the  additional  charge  of  the  post  of  Secretary,  National  Cooperative .Development  Corporation,  with  effect  from  the  forenoon  of  the  2nd  November 1967.
[No.  F.  6-2/87-Plan.]
SO-  4086.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  Section  8(1)  of  the  National 'Cooperative  Development  Corporation  Act,  1962  (No.  26  of  1962),  the  Central Government,  in  consultation  with  the  National  Cooperative  Development  Cor- poration,  have  appointed  Shri  S.  K.  S.  Chib,  Joint  Secretary  in  the  National Cooperative  Development  Corporation,  as  Secretary  of  the  Corporation  with effect  from  the  forenoon  of  the  2nd  November,  1967.
[No.  F.  6-2/67-Plan.]
V.  V.  NATHEN,  Dy.  Secy.
MINISTRY  OF  LABOUR,  EMPLOYMENT  &  REHABILITATION
(Department  of  Labour-and  Employment)
New  Delhi,  the  6th  November  1967
S.O.  4087.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 •of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Industrial  Tribunal,  Jabalpur,  In  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers in  relation  to  the  management  of  Mosaboni  Mines  of  Indian  Copper  Corporation Limited  and  their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on the  2nd  November,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR  COURT JABALPUR Doted  October  25,  1967
PRESENT:
Sri  G.  C.  Agarwala,  Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  NO.  CGIT/LC(R)  (72)/67  (JABALPUE  TRIBUNAL) REFERENCE  NO.  4/GB—(DHANBAD  TRIBUNAL)
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  management  of  Mosaboni  Mines  of  Indian Copper  Corporation  Limited,  Ghatsila  (Singhbhum)
Versus
Their  workmen  through  the  Acting  General  Secretary,  Mosaboni  Mines Labour  Union,  P.O.  Mosaboni,  Dist.  Singhbhum.

SEC. :,  ,  GA  Ln  A: .  ,  .  . 18,  /Ki  .  .  , .  432£
APPEARANCES:
For  employers—Sri  K. C. God,  Legal  Officer  of the Corporation.
For  workmen—S/Sri  H. B. Singh  'Arsi'  General  Secretary  of the Union.
INDUSTRY:  Copper  Mine.  DISTRICT:  Singhbhum  (Bihar).
AWARD
The  Ministry  of Labour  & Employment  by Notification  No.  24/26/64-LRI  dated 21st  December  1964 referred  the following  dispute  as stated  in the schedule to the  order  of reference  for adjudication  to Central  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad, from  wher,?  it  was  transferred  to this  Tribunal  by Notification  No,  8/25/67-LRII dated  25th  April,  1907:
SCHEDULE
Whether  the action  of the management  of Mosaboni  Mines  of Indian  Copper Corporation  Limited,  P.O. Ghatsila,  Dist.  Singhbhum  in  dismissing Sri  Bhupati  Sen B. No. 598B  with  effect  from  the 2Gth  June.  1964 was justified?  If  not, 1,o what  relief  is the workman  entitled?
On  examining  the pleadings  of the -parties  issues  were  settled  on 16th  June 1967 at  camp  Allahabad.  The first  dat.?  of  hearing  was fixed  at  Ghat.sila  on  30th August  1967, but before  that,  the parties  entered  into  a pack  deal  on 2Pth  August ]067  compromising  some  of the cases  including  this  case  out of a  large  number of  cases  which  had been  pending  before  this  Tribunal,  On the date  of hearing, however,  the management  filed  an application  resiling  from  the compromise and on  6th September  1967 elaborate  arguments  were  heard  on the question  whether the  management  had an unrestricted  right  to resile  from  a  compromise  agree- ment  before  it has been  adopted  by the  Tribunal  as part  of the award.  An order on  the question  was  recorded  on 20(h  September  1967 which  is annexure  "A" to this  award.  Before,  however,  it  could  be transcribed  the management  filed an- other  application  on 30th  September  1967 that  they  would  withdraw  their  objec- tion  and would  abide  by the compromise  settlement.  That  being  so, the dispute now  remains  settled  by the compromise  arrived  at  between  the parties  and  as para  1 of  the compromise  petition  annexurc  "C  would  show  the management has  agreed  to reinstate  Sri Bhupati  Sen.  The dispute  is thus  satisfactorily re- solved  and an award  is recorded  in terms  of pira  1 of compromise  agreement.
(Sd.)  G.  C  AGAIUVALA,
Presiding  Officer.
25-10-67.
ANNEXURE  "A"
BEFORE  THE CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR  COURT,  JABALPUR
Dated  September  20/28, 1967
PRESENT ;
Shri  G. C. Agarwala,  Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  UNDER  SECTION  10  I.D.  ACT
1.  REF, NO.  CGlT/LC(R)(72)/67
CASES  UNDER  SECTION  33-A  I.D, ACT
1.  CASE  NO. CGIT/LC(A)  (18)/67 2.  CAM NO. CGIT/LCfA)  (19)/67
3.  CASE  NO. CGHVLC(A)  (21)/67
4.  CASE  NO. CGIT/LC(A)  (23)/67
APPLICATIONS  UNDER  SECTION  33(2)  (b) I.D. ACT
 
1.  APPLICATION  NO. CGIT/LC(B)  (20)/67 2.  „  „  (27)/67 3.  ,.  „  (31)/67 4.  „  „  (35)/67 5.  „  „  (47)/67 6.  „  „  (40)/67 7.  „  „  (46)/67

•  ,  •  .  .  ,  ,  * I. •  11—
8.  APPLICATION  NO.  CGIT/LC(B)  (49)/67 9.  „  „  (54)/67 10.  „  „  (57) /67 ..  (72) /67 11.  „ 12.  „  „  (76)/67 .,  (78)/67 13.  „ .,  <82)/67 14.  „
PARTIES:
M/s,  Indian  Copper  Corporation  Limited
Versus
,Their  Workmen,
.APPEARANCES:
For  employers—Shvi  K.  C.  Goel,  Legal  Officer  of  the  Corporatioa For  opposite  party—S/Shri  C.  J.  Vyas,  Vice  President  & H.  B.  Singh  "Arsi" General  Secretary  of  Mosaboni  Mines  Labour  Union,  Ghatsila.
INDUSTRY:  Copper.
DISTRICT:  Singhbhum.
ORDER


..
1/
In  doubt.  In  Poona  Mozdoor  Sabha  v.  Dhutta  and  another  reported  in  1956-I1-LLJ p-  319  at  page  321  Chagla  C.J.  made  some  doubtful  observation  as- follows  :—
"Industrial  law  takes  no  notice  of  any  private  settlement  or  agreement arrived  at  between  the  parties  in  the  course  of  an  industrial  dispute. Such  a  private  agreement  belongs  to  the  realm  of  contract,  it  may Hive  rise  to  contractual  rights  ;  but  when  we  are  dealing  with industrial  law  it  has  no  sanction  whatsoever."
But  another  portion  of  the  judgment  at  page  323  however,  nullified  the  sting of  the  above  observation-  It  runs  as  follows :—
"Industrial  peace  demands  that  sanctity  should  be  attached  to  agreements freely  arrived  at  by  the  parties  and  if  the  view  went  ibrond  that private  settlements  have  no  sanctity  whatsoever,  then  there  wculd be  little  chance  of  disputes  ending  by  settlement  between  the parties.  It  will  indeed  by  extremely  unfortunate  from  the  point ot  view  of  labour".
From  the  aforesaid  subsequent  observation  of  the  Learned  Chief  .Justice, it  Is  clear  that  sanctity  was  attached  to  agreements  freely  arrived  at  and  should be  honoured  and  acted  upon  by  the  Tribunals.  The  Kerala  Court  in  1957 (II)  LLJ  p.  45  Krishnakuliy  Nuir  v.  Industrial  Tribunal  considered  this  question as  also  the  rights  of  the  parties  to  adjust  their  differences  wholly  or  In  part by  lawful  agreements  or  compromise.  The  following  is  a  material  passage  which needs  repr(,":Uidinn :—
"Now,  it  is  the  elementary  right  of  the  parties'  to  a  dispute  to  adjust  their matters  of  difference  wholly  or  in  part,  by  any  lawful  agre9ment or  compromise.  And  every  authority  entrusted  with  the  task  of adjudicating  the  dispute  has  a  duty,  not  a  discretion,  to  record  such agreement  or  compromise  subject  possibly  to  an  inherent  power  of refusal  when  substantial  injiustice  would  be  worked.  A  Tribunal therefore,  to  whom  an  industrial  dispute  Is  referred  for  adjudication under  Section  10(1) (C)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  must  record a  lawful  agreement  or  compromise  placed  before  it  by  the  disputants. There  is  nothing  in  tha  Act  to  suRRest  that  a  Darticular  clnss  of agreement  or  compromise  is  outside  its  scope,  though  whether  a particular  compromise  is  lawful  or  not  will  vary  with  the  varying character  of  different  disputes.  The  expression  "determination"  in the  definition  of  "award"  in  the  Act  indicates  only  a  comma  to  an end,  may  be  in  any  way  whatever,  though  It  may  require  examina- tion  and  choice".
On  the  principle  enunciated  In  the  above  ruling,  the  Industrial  Tribunals  have been  accepting  compromise  agreements  arrived  at  freely  and  lawfully  and incorporation  the  samp  in  their  awards.  The  question,  however,  is  whether  a party  having  entered  into  a  lawful  agreement  has  an  unfettered  and  inherent right  without  showing  just  cause  to  resile  from  the  same-  There  Is  no  direct case  law  on  the  point  but  a  few  which  have  some  relevancy  may  be  stated
3.  The  Madras  High  Court  in  workers  employed  in  32  textiles  mills,  Combatore District  Mill  Workers'  Union  v  Dhanalakshmi  Mills  Ltd-  I960  (II)  LLJ  p.  55fl— A-I.R.  1900  (Mad.)  page  212  observed  that  the  Industrial  Tribunals  have  no power  similar  to  one  under  Order  XXIII  R.  3  CP.C  to  record  a  compromise- In  the  next  paragraph,  however,  the  position  was  made  clear  by  the  following1 passage  ;—
"this  does  not,  however,  mean  that  the  Tribunal  is  precluded!  from taking  note  of  a  compromise  entered  into  between  the  workers  and the  management  Where  there  Is  a  compromise,  it  should  consider whether,  in  Its  opinion,  the  compromise  could  be  adopted  as  Its own  determination  of  the  dispute,  i.e.  whether  It  is  fair,  just  and equitable  between  the  parties".
4.  In  the  ruling  under  consideration,  three  of  the  Unions  and  the  management of  the  mills  entered  into  a  compromise  agreement.  Another  Union  which  was not  a  party  to  the  agreement  but  represented  a  substantial  number  of  the  work- men  of  the  mills  did  not  accept  the  compromise  and  desired  determination  by the  Tribunal.  The  Tribunal  overruled  the  objection  and  accepting  the  com- promise  agreement  recorded  an  award-  It  was  In  this  context  that  the  Hon'ble High  Court  made  the  above  observation  and  held  that  as  the  Union  was  entitled to  be  heard  under  Section  3(5  LD.  Act,  the  Tribunal  was  wrong  in  Ignoring  the request  and  accepting  the  compromise.

Sic.  S(U)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTULA  27,  1889  4339
5-  The  Allahabad  High  Court  in  a  case  Raza  Textile  Labour  Union  v. R.  Mohan  reported  in  I.F.L.R.  1964(8)  p.  306  which  has  some  bearing  on  the question  considered  the  effect  of  a  settlement  before  a  statutory  arbitrator under  U,P.  Industrial  Disputes  Act  and  which  was  not  registered  as  required by  Section  6B  of  the  U.P.  Act.  This  Section  requires  an  agreement  to  be registered  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  in  the  prescribed  manner  il  arrived at  outside  conciliation  proceedings.  It  was  held  that  Section  6B  was  a  self contained  provision  and  the  unregistered  settlement  incorporated  in  the  award was  binding  by  virtue  of  Section  6(5)  of  the  Act.  The  case  in  therefore,  is  of no  material  help  except  for  the  position  that  a  settlement  not  having  been brought  about  in  a  prescribed  manner  can  nevertheless  be  acted  upon.  The material  clues,  however,  is  furnished  by  the  observation  of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme Court  in  Swadeshi  Cotton  Mills  v.  Rajeshwar  Prasad  and  others  reported  in 1960-II-LLJ  p.  707.  That  was  a  case  where  after  the  decision  of  the  Labour Appellate  Tribunal,  the  parties  entered  into  a  compromise  in  respect  of  an appeal  pending  before  the  Hon'ble  Court.  The  Supreme  Court  framed  two issues,  one  on  the  factual  aspect  of  the  compromise  and  second,  whether  it  waa a  valid  one,  and  remitted  them  for  a  finding  from  the  Tribunal.  The  Tribunal found  that  the  compromise  had  in  fact  taken  place  and  was  a  valid  one.  The Supreme  Court  accepted  the  findings  and  disposed  of  the  appeal  in  terms  of the  compromise.  At  page  710,  the  following  material  observation  waa  made:-—
"Just  as  an  industrial  dispute  could  have  b"en  settled  between  the  parties either  before  it  was  referred  for  adjudication  to  the  Industrial Tribunal,  or  after  It  was  referred  and  before  the  award  waa  pro- nounced  by  the  Tribunal,  so  would  it  be  open  to  the  parties  to settle  the  dispute  BO long  as  it  was  pending  either  before  the  Labour Appellate  Tribunal  or  before  this  Court."
Prom  the  above  observation,  it  is  clear  that  even  during  the  pendency  of  a case  before  a  Tribunal  the  parties  can  legitimately  compromise  the  dispute- In  the  last  but  one  paragraph  of  the  judgment  at  page  711, the  following  observa- tion  clinches  the  whole  matter:—
"The  compromise  in  question  is  intended  to  be  filed  in  this  Court  for  the purpose  of  enabling  the  parties  to  request  this  Court  to  pass  an order  in  terms  of  the  said  compromise.  The  procedure  for  obtaining such  an  order  which  has  to  be  followed  Is-  the  procedure  prescribed by  the  rules  of  this  Court,  just  as,  if  a  compromise  was  reached before  the  tribunal,  the  procedure  to  be  followed  before  it  would be  the  procedure  prescribed  by  its  rules".
From  the  above  observation,  it  is  evident  that  when  a  compromise  is  filed before  a  tribunal,  the  tribunal  has  to  ascertain  firstly,  the  fact  of  the  compromise and  secondly  the  validity  therefore.  Even  though,  therefore,  provisions  of Order  XXIII  Rule  3  C-P.C-  may  not  be  available  to  the  tribunal,  yet  on  general principles  if  a  valid  compromise  has  been  reached  it  would  be  the  duty  of  the tribunal  to  examine  the  same  and  accept  the  same  if  found  valid.  After  all, a  compromise  Is  a  contract  and  under  Section  10  of  the  Indian  Contract  Act  "all agreements  are  contracts  If  they  are  made  by  the  free  consent  of  the  parties  com- petent  to  contract,  for  a  lawful  consideration  and  with  a  lawful  object  and  are  not hereby  expressly  declared  to  be  void".  Consequently,  the  rule  incorporated  in  Order XXIII  R,3  C.P-C.  is  based  on  the  sound  principle  of  freedom  of  contracts  and  tha requirements  are  the  same  as  are  found  in  the  definition  of  Section  10  of  the  Con- tract  Act,  Even  though,  therefore,  O.XXIII  R.3  C.P.C.  may  not  be  applicable  yet the  tribunal  would  apply  the  general  principles,  particularly  when  the  object  of industrial  adjudication  is  to  achieve  industrial  peace  and  settle  the  disputes  on  con- siderations  of  social  justice-  When  no  rules  of  procedure  are  prescribed  regarding any  compromise  arrived  at  during  the  pendency  of  a  case  before  the  Tribunal,  the general  principle  will  apply  on  the  lines  Indicated  by  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court In  Swadeshi  Cotton  Mills  case  (supra).
6.  It  is,  therefore,  held  that  the  Corporation  has  not  got  an  unfettered  right to  resile  from  the  compromise  arrived  at  in  these  cases  and  the  fact  of  the  com- promise  to  gather  with  its  validity  will  have  to  be  enquired  into  as  a  question of  fact.  The  parties  will,  therefore,  be  directed  to  adduce  necessary  evidence  on the  point  and  will  be  informed  accordingly.
 
7.  After  the  order  was  dictated  on  20th  September  1967  and  before  it  could be  transcribed  and  signed  the  representative  of  the  management,  Shri  K.  C.  Goel, has  applied  that  the  application  dated  30th  August  1967  resiling  from  the  com- promise  is  not  being  pressed  and  the  management  would  abide  by  the  compromise settlement  arrived  at  on  4th  August  1867.  That  being  so,  there  Is  no  necessity

i "0  THEUAZFTTX  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  IS,  1967/KAimHA  %1, 1880  [FAI*  H~
left  to  call  for  evidence  on  the  point  of  fact  whether  there  was  a  compromise entered  into  and  the  same  was  a  valid  and  lawful  0110.
Dictated  on  20-9-87 Transcribed  on  28-9-67.
Q.  C.  AGARWALA, Presiding  Officer- Central  Government  Indurtrial  Tribunal-cum Labour  Couxtf Jabalpur.
List  of tht  casts under  Section  33(3)(b).
ANNBXUHB  "A"
Case No. Jabalpur
Name of the parties
81. No.
Dhanbad
l
2
3
(i8)/67
CGIT/LC(B)
Vs.  Shri  Masu, No. 1239  Car Drlter.
t.
M/s. Indian  Copper Corporation Ltd.
Shri  Lasoo  MaJhiNo,  2429,  R/
Do.j
(15/65) (i9)/67
Do.
Checker.
a.
(34/65) (20)/67
Do.
Shri  Muchlramj  B.  No.  7582, Do.
3.
M/Swccper.
(36/65)
(ai)/67
Do.
Shri  Suran  Purty  No.  8070,
Do.
4-
S/Checker.
(38/65) (22)/67
Do.
Do.
Shri  FU]cndra  Sirankj  No.  5799, 5-
Sepoy.
(30/67) (23)I67
Do.
Shri  M.  K.  K. Nair, No. 785S, Do.
6.
R/  Checker.
(40/65)
(24)/67)
Do.
Do.
Shri  Amta  Naik,  No.  1367. Cr 7-
Mazdur.
(41/65) (25/67)
Do.
Do.
Shri  Guha  Bah.  Chcttrey,  No. 8.
8131, M/R.
(43/63) (26)/67
Do.
Do.
Shri  Bideahl  Bren  No. 1769,  JH/ 9-
Sweeper.
(45/65) (z-'Vfi?
Do.
10.
Do.
Shri  Dhananjoy  Pator,  No. 5619,
Mucker.
(46/65) (28)/67
Do.
Do.
i i.
Shri  Bhatla  Majhi,  No. 910, At/
Mazdoor.
(47/65) (29)167
Do.
Do.
ia.
Shri  Ghaairam  Naifc  No.  7272,
(48/65)
Trammer.
(3°)/67
Do.
Do.
Shri Bidooram  Sardar, No. 4507.
*3-
(50/65)
(30/67
Do.
Do.
Shri  Muneswar, No. 3355,  Tram- M.
mer.
(5i/"5) (32)/67
Do.
Do.
Shri  Kalu, No. 7513,  M/6weepor.
*S<
(54/65) (33)/67
16.
Do.
Do.
Shri Tila, No. 3772, F/Sweep$r,
 
(56/65)

1W7 S(Ufl  TH*  OAZSTTK  Of  tMOM !  WOVWMB*  W  TW/RAKT1M  ",  IMT  4 3 3*
I
3
(34M"7
CGIT/LCCB)
?i|.  Man  Bah.  Gurung,  No.  3776,
Indian Copper
17-
Corporation  Ltd.
Sepoy.
(57/6S)
(35)/67
Do.
Do.
Munetwar.  No.  6595,  TnunttMt.
rt.
(58/65)
(36)/66
Do.
Bom  Bah.  Taming,  No.  776ft,
Do.
19.
Mucker.
(59/65)
(37)/67
Do.
ao.
Do.
Haripada Karmakar, No. 3178.
(60/67) (38)/67
2 1.
Do.
Md. Abbas, No. 2382, Bi/Heldbt
Do.
(65/65)
(39)/67
Do.
Do.
Sk. Munu, No. 5974,  Mucker.
a".
(1/66)
(4O)/67
Do.
Bhuban Narayan Deo, No.  79S1.
Do.
2 3.
(3/66)
(4i;/"7
Do.
Pratima,  No.  5716,  F/Swecper.
*4.
Do.
(4/66)
(42)/67
Do.
Do.
Bhuban  Bah,  Thappa,  No.  5719,
25-
Sepoy.
(5/66) (43)/67
3 6.
Do.
Bibhlsan, No, 7529,  M/Sweeper,
Do.
(11/66)
(44)/67
27-        Do.                               Do.              Baldebj No. 5101,  M/Swecpcr.
                         (13/66)
                         (45)/67
2 8.       Do.                               Do.

Shib  Shankar  Nair,  No,  7989,
Mucker.
(14/66) (46)/67
39.
Do.-
Do.
Ram Bilas Singh, No.  3 819.
(15/66).
(47)/6?
JO.
Do.
Do.
Muneswar,  No.  6495,  Tnunmcty
(26/66) (48)/67
Do.
Do.
Bhola Karmakar, No, 2015
31-
(27/66)
Mucker,
(49)/6?
Do.
Do.
3 2.
Abdul Karim, No. 4664, Mucker.
(28/66)
(50)/67
Do.
Do.
Jogendra  Prasad,  No.  734  M/
33-
Mazdur.
(30/66)
(5i)/67
Do.
Do.
Balbir  Singh, No.  7810,  Mucker.
34-
(31/66) (52)/67
Do.
Do.
Magan  Pator,  No.  2482,  M/
35-
Masedoor.
(32/66) (53)/67
Do.
Do.
Md. Burhan, No. 4644,  Tramnnf.
36.
(33/"6)

4333  T t tl  GAZETTE  OF TNDIAT  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  87; 1"89  [PAW  I tr  ,
I
3
C54)/S7
Vs.  Naiki Hoe, No. 7722,  T/Mazdooi
Indian  Copper  Cor-
CGIT/LC(B)
37.
poration Ltd.
(36/66)
(55)/67
Haripada  Pator,  No. 3204, Mu- Do.
Do.
38.
cker.
(37/66) (56)/67
Prem  Bah. Tamang,  No.  4620,.
Do.
Do.
39.
Mucker.
(46/66) (36/A)/67
Tak Bah. Chctrry, No, 3593.
Do.
40.
Do.
(54/66)
(57)/67
Do.
Do.
41.
Parmanand  Ghasi, No. 1811, M/
Sweeper.
(64/66)
(58)/67
Do.
Do.
42.
Sripat  Pntar,  B, No. i697.
(67/66)
(59)/67
Do.
Sudhan  Sharma,  No.  359,  Black-
Do.
43-
smith.
(68/66) (6o)/67
Do.
Abdul Manan, No.  8 67 J.  F.G.
Do.
44.
Mazdoor.
(69/66)
Do.
(6i)/67
Do.
Nasiruddin  Khan, No.  872j  F.G. 45-
Mazdoor.
(70/66) (62)/67
Dhananjoy  Singh, No, 5062, Do.
Do.
46.
(71/66)
(63)/67
S. Moni, No. 74585 Mucker.
Do.
Do.
47-
(75/66) (64)/67
Bishwanath Pator, No.  3790,  H/ Do.
Do.
Mazdoor.
48.
(76/66) (65)/67
Dhiren Pator, No. 5624) Trammer.
Do.
Do..
49-
(78/66) (66)/67
Do.
Do.
Parsuram  Singh,  No. 4786,  T/
Mazdoor.
30.
(81/66)
(67)/67
Kharga Bah. Lama,  No.  3447'
Do.
Do.
M/R.
5 i.
(82/66) (68)/67
Sadhoo  Singh,  No. 133,  Engs,
Do.
Deptt.
Do.
(87/66)
52.
(.69)167
                                           Do.             KamalSinghjNo.303,  Rigger.
53-        Do.          (88/66)
                        (70)/67             Do.             Khetra  Mohan  Pator,  No, 231
54-       Do.                                                   Mucker.
                        (90/66)
                       (7i)/67
55-       Do.                              Do.             Ashit  Kumar  Mahato,  No,  3718,
                        (93/66)                               M/Mazdoor.
                       (7>)/"7
56.       Do.                              Do.             Lai Mohan Singh. No.  2237,
                        (95/66)                               Blaster Hr.


STd. J(liJ]  THE GAZ1TTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEM^  IB,  /Kik  .iXi,  4 3 3J
3
I
(.73)1*7
Vs.  Dulu, No. 1868, M/Sweepor.
Indian  Copper
CGIT/LC(B)
57.
Corporation .Ltd.
(4/67)
(74>/<>7
Do.
C.iaman  Lama, >j0. 3532, Do.
58.
Mu> ker.
5.'*7
(751/67
Do.
R.  Chattu  Kutty,  No.  3082, Do.
59-
Mucker.
6/67
(761/67
Do.
Sheo  Prasad  Singh,  No. 1768, Do.
S/Inspector.
7/^7
(77)/67
Do. ;
Ma  1  ;la Pator, No. 4S53) T/Maz- Du.
6 1.
door.
8/67
(78)/67
Fulchand  Pator,  No.  770,
Do.
Do.
6 2.
M/Mazdoor.
13/67
(79)/67
Fadum  Majhi,  No.  5932j
Do.
13...
63.
P/Mazdoor.
T4/67
(ao)/67
Do.
Abinash Pator,  No. 3568,Muckcr.
Do.
64.
15/67 (8i)/67
D o.
Siiigrai  Hoe,  No.  5432,  Round Do.
65.
Checker.
16/67
(8a)/67
Basudeo  Pator,  No.  8023,
Do.
66.
Do.
U/G.  F./Hr.
39/67 (S4)/67
Amulya  Rana, No. 4916,
Do.
Do.
67.
T/Mazdoor.
41/67
(85)/67
Man. Bah. Noor, No. 7493.
Do.
Do.
68.
42/67 (86)/67
Bhimbadhar Dhir, No. 5855.
Do.
Do.
69.
43/67 (87)/67
Do.
N. K. Colombo, No. 3111, Tram- Do.,,
7 0.
mer.
159/67 (88)/67
Do.
Md. Burhan3 No. 4644, Trammer.
Do.
7 1-
60/67
C89)/67
Do.
Gope  Bahadur  Chcttry3  No. 29.
Do.
72.
Mucker.
61/67 (90/67)
Shti  Raghunath,  No.  1874, M/
Do.
Do.
73-
Sweeper.
63/67
(9T)/67
Shri  Rajendra  Kaihartha,  No.
Do.
Do.
74-
3022, Mucker.
64/07
(9=0/67
Shri Churc Pun, No. 5072, Sepoy.
Do.
Do.
75-
65/67
(93)/67
Dagam  Singh  Ghale,  No. 7695,
Do.
Do.
76.
Sepoy.
 
ii("./67

- g --  OJ  ^  .  W>  ;  *TIKA  *T.  !B6"  [?***  H-I
3
 (9S)/67
Indian Copper  Cor- Vs.  Nara  Hoc, No.  56735 P- F.  Helper.
CGIT/LCCB)
77-  '
poration Ltd.
68/67 (96)/67
D o.
Nuruddin Mian3 No. 2920, Blester.
Do.
78.
69/67 (97)/67
Chet  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  3798,
Do.
Do.
79-
Mucker.
70/67 (98)/67
Sanghl Bodra, No. 6332, Trammcv,
Do.
Do.
50.
71/67 (99)/67
Chamba  Singh  Lama,  No,  8066,
Do.
Do.
Si.
Blaster.
72/67 ClOO)/67
Darud  Khan,  No.  6005,  Mucker.
Do.
Do.
82.
73/67
(iOi)/67
Sakal  Bah,  Darjee,  No.  6070,
Do.
Do.
83.
Mucker.
74/67 (lO2)/67
Bhuban Pator, No. 2431, Muckw
Do.
Do.
84.
75/67 CiO3)/67
KeBhab Majhi, No. 4183, Mucker
Do.
Do.
85.
76/67 (1045/67
Ram  Majhi,  No. 4796, M/S"rdnr
Do.
Do.
86.
; 77/67 (ios)/67
Lftl  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  8438,
Do.
Do.
87-
Mucker.
78/67 (io6)/67)
Bikram  Murmoo,  No.  7871,
Do.
Do.
88.
Mucker.
79/67 (iO7)/67
Ram  Chandra  Giri,  No,  544*,
Do.
Do.
89.
M/R.
80/67 (io8)/67
Lakhlnder  Majhl,  No.  5879,
Do.
Do.
90.
Mucker.
81/67 (iog)/67
?uney  Darjee,  No.  4833,  Tram-
D o.
Do.
9 1.
mer.
82/67
(H")/67
Makar  Bah.  Lamaj  No.  484a.
Do.
Do.
92.
M/R.
83/67 ( I I I ) / 67
Lakhan Lai Neor, No. 7342, M/R
Do.
D o.
93-
84/67 (H2))/67
Lai Bah. Tamang, No. 3533,  M/R
Do.
Do.
94.
85/67 (H3)/67
Do.
BhaktflBah.  Sonar3  No,  |  338 Do.
95-
M/R.
86/67
(ii4)/67)
Krishna  Bah.  Srlstaj  No.  4740
Do.
Do.
96.
Mucker.
 
87/67

I
2
3
("5)/67
CGIT/LC(B)
Indian  Copper Vs.  Lai  Bah.  Tarnang,  No.  7935> 97.
88/67 Corporation  Lttt.
Mucker.
(ii6)/67
98.
Do.
Sher  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  3597,
Do.
M/R.
89/67 (ii7)/67
Do.
Do.
Padam  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  4047, 99.
M/R.
90/67 (ii8)/67
100.
Do.
Padam  Bah.  Lama,  No.  2944,
Do.
91/67
M/R.
(119V67
101.
Do.
Sam  Bah.  Thappa,  No. 2813,
Do.
Mucker.
92/67 (120V67
Prem  Bah.  Neor,  No.  3603*
Do.
Do.
102.
Mucker.
93/67 (121V67
103.
Do.
Do.
Prem Bah. Chettry,  No.  2609, -  Mucker.
94/67 (l22)/67
Do.
104-
Kashilingam,  No. 2026,  Muckei.
Do.
95/67 (l23)/67
Do.
Prafulla  Simli, No. 2859, Mucker.
Do.
105.
96/67 (l24)/67
Salkhan  Hnnsda,  No.  8477, I06.
Do.
Do.
Mucker,
97/67 (i2s)/67
IO7.
Talak  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  7862, Do.
Do.
Mucker.
98/67 (i26)/67
108.
Dhanu  Hanada,  No.  28961
Do.
Do.
T/Maidoor.
99/67 (i27)/67
Kharga  Bah. Thappaj  No. 4844, 109.
Do.
Do.
Mucker.
100/67 (i28)/67
n o.
Do.
Do.
AnandH  Sardar,  No.  2948,
T/Muzdoor.
101/67
(i29)/67
Padam  Bah. Lama,  No. 7065,
Do.
111.
Do.
T/Mazdoor.
102/67 (T30)/67
Do.
112.
Nar Bah. Darjcc3 No. 4867) Do.
Trammer.
103/67 (T3D/67
Surbir  Chettry, No. 5398,
Do.
113.
Do.
Trammer.
10J67 (13^/67
Thiraj Upadhya,  No. 4803,
Do.
114.
Do.
Trammer.
105/67
(iJ3)/67
Do.
Hari Giri, No. 2636, Mucker.
Do.
115.
106/67
(i34)/67
Bil  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  4474,
Do.
116.
Do,
Mucker.
 
107/67

ft
I
3
CGIT/LC(B)
Vs.  Chabilal  Neor,  No.  4373,  Tram- Ci35)/67
117.
Indian  Copper  Cor-
poration Ltd.
mer.
108/67
(13O/67
Do.
Do.
Dhir Singh,  No.  5154,  U/G
118.
109/67
Sweeper.
(i37)/67
Do.
Do,
Kushnu  Majhi, No. 5894,  Mucker.
119.
110/67

Do.
Do.
Birkha  Bah.  Thappa,  No.  4991,
120.
111/67
M/R.
(i39)/67
Do.
Ismafluddin,  No.  2702,  Mucker.
Do.
H I,
112/67
(i4O)/67
Do.
Do.
Kama  Bah.  Mogor,  No.  2 0 "j
132.
Mucker.
"3/67
(14D/67
Do.
Do.
Aswini  Kr.  Adhlkan,  No.  2323
123.
114/67
Mucker.
(i42)/67
Do.
Do.
Ratna  Bah.  Chcttry,  No.  2257,
114.
B/Hr.
115/67
(i43)/6?
Do.
Do.
Thakram  Darjeej  No.  2951,  J/
116/67
Mazdoor.
(i44)/6?
Do.
Do.
Ram  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  3009,
" ".
117/67
Mucker.
(i45)/"7
Do.
Do.
Daamat  Majhi,  No.  2643,  T/
" 7,
118/67
Mazdoor.
(i46)/67
Do.
Do.
Netra  Bah.  Thappa,  No.  8033,
ia8.
Mucker.
119/67
(i47)/"7
Do.
Do.
Bhim  Bah.  Upadhya,  No.  8064, 129.
Mucker.
120/67 (i48)/67
Do.
Do.
R. Rajee,  No. 6230, Lorry  Driver.
130.
131/67
(i49)/67
Do.
Do.
C. Debda",  No.  3358, Shaft  Maz- 131.
door.
122/67
(i5O)/67
Do.
Do.
Sashi  Bhusan  Bhakt,  No.  5205, 13a.
H/Mazdoor.
123/67
C15D/67
Do.
Do.
C. Dcbdas, No.  3258,  Shaft  Mai-
133-
124/67
door.
(15^/67
Do.
Do.
Girish, No.  1884, M/  Mazdoor.
134-
134/67
(i53)/67
Do.
Do.
Tajuddin  Mia,  No.  5488,  Tram-
135-
mer.
135/67
(i54)/<7
Do.
Do,
136.
Kashim  Khan, No.  8056,  Tram-
mer.
136/67

Sir.  3(11)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4337
I
2
3
(iBd)/67
Indian Copper V*. Cor-
CGIT/LC(B)
Lai  Bah.  Chettry, No.  2O37.
137-
poration Ltd.
62/67
138.
Hariram,  Bclderj  No.  8498,
Do.
Do.
(18O/67
Mucker.
(182V67
Ladu  Hoe,  No,  3646.
139.
140.
Do. Do,
Do. Do.
Chandra] Majhi3  No.  7951,  Muc-
(iB3)/67
|Jcr.
Do.
Do.
Srinath  Majhi,  No.  2669,  T/ 141.
(i84)/67
Mazdoor.
Do.
Do.
Paneha  Kcshram,  No,  471 142.
(i85)/67
Mucker.
143-
144.
Do.         (i86)/67             Do.
Do.         (i87)/67             Do.
             (i88)/67

145.
146.
                                                  Jitu Mahali, No. 5812,  Mucker.
                                                  Kandey  Hoe, No.  4619,  Muckcf.
Do.                              Do.              Rattan Sabar, No. 7977J  Trammer,
Do.         C189V67              Do.              Dukhu  Mukhi,  No.  8640,  M/
                                                     Sweeper.
Do.                              Do.              Ashram, No. 3i7o,  M/Sweeper.
Do.                              Do.             Shri  Suren  Patotj  No.  7719,  M/

147-
148.
(i90)/67 (I9D/67
(iO2)/67
149.
150.
                                                 Mazdoor.
Do.                             Do.              Bhagabati,No. 5116,  M/Mazdoor.
Do.                             Do.             RengtaMi"ihi,No. 7426,  Tranunci-.

(i93)/67
Bhali, B, No.  7524, M/t,  Sweeper Narendra  Behra,  No,  7619,  M/ 151. 152.
Do. Do.
Do. Do.
(l94)/67
(i95)/67)
Sweeper.
Do.
Haradhan  Bharik,  No.  7067, Tra-
Do.
X33-
(i96)/67
mmer.
154.
Do.
Padam  Ch.  Naik,  No.  1814,  M/
Do.
Ci97/67)
Sweeper,
155.
Do,
Do.
Sidia  Bhoipai  No.  2975,  TnunL (l98)/67
mer.
Rattan  Sagar,  No.  8642,  M/ 156.
Do.
Do,
(l99)/67
Sweeper.
(2OD)/67
157-
158.
Kartik, No.  866o,  M/Sweeper. Som  Bah, Laka, No. 3291,  Muc- (202)/67
Do, Do.
Do. Do.
ker.
Makardha) Chettiy, No.  5820,  H/
Do.
Do.
(2O3)/67
159-
Mazdoor.
160.
Do.
Do.
(2O4)/67
(2O5)/67
161.
Do.
Do.
Iamailuddin, No, 4655,  Tnunmor.^ Tek  Bah. Gurungj  No.  475^3 Mucker.
Kharga  Bah.  Chcttry,  No.  7870, 162.
Do.
Do.
(2O6)/67
Mucker.
Kripa  Singh  Lama,  No.  8021 163.
Do.
Do.
(2O7)/67
Mucker.
Rana  Bah.  Chettry,  No.  4559, 164.
Do.
Do.
(2O8)/67
Trammer.
Padam  Bah. Thakuri, No.  4780, Do.
Do.
(2O9)/67
165.
Mucker.
Lai  Bah.  Chettryj No.  4724,  Muc-
Do.
Do.
(2IO)/67
166.
ker.
Him.  Bah.  Chcttry,  No.  6113,
Do.
Do.
167.
(210/67
Mucker.

4 - jg  THE  OX  ,  <  A:  :  . ..  18,  , Ku  ji  "v,  ,  I*  —
i
I
2
Sukra  Mahakur,  No. 819, M/
Do.
Do.
168.
(2I2)/67
Mazdoor,
Narain  Girl, B. No. 7093, Muck-
Do.
Do.
(2i5)/67
169.
er.
Mohammad  Pin,  B.  Mo. 344%
Do.
Do.
(2i6)/67
170.
Mucker.
Padam  Bah. Chettry, No. 4920,
Do.
Ho.
171.
C"7)/"T
M. Runner.
Som  Bahadur  Neor,  No.  8458'
Do.
(2i8)/67
Vo.
17a.
Mucker.
Basant  Kumar  Mahapatra, No.
Do.
Do.
(2I9)/67
*73-
illegible Driver, Ct. II.
Bhadra Bahadur Nagar, No. 4441
Do.
(22O)/67
Do.
1 7*
T. Mazdoor.
Kaonan  Baidu,  B.  No.  2506
Do.
(22l)/67
Do.
i ".
Hosting Mazdoor.
Debir  Prasad  Srista,  No.  2628,,
Do.
Do.
(222)/67
176.
Round Checker.
D o.
Kiohuna  Majhi,  No.  6102,  M/ (224)/67
Do.
177.
Mazdoor.
Deleswar  Mahanandia, No.  7874
Do.
(a27)/67
Do.
178.
Mile  Sweeper.
Arjoon  Majhi,  No.  2519,  T
Do.
(228)/67
Do.
179.
Mazdoor.
Bhubancswar Chaubcy, B. No.
Do.
(233)/67
Do.
ilo.
50 JO, Sepoy.
ANHIXURE  B
ORDER
After  the  pronouncement  of  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  in  Tata  Iron  &  Steel Company  Vs. Singh  (D.R.)  reported  in  1965-II-LLJ  p.  122 and  decided  on  March 19,  1965, the  employers  in  most  cases,  whether  opposing  an  application  under Section  33-A oi  I.D. Act or  themselves  applying  for  approval  under  Section 33(2) (b)  I.D. Act  have  solicited  decision  of  the  Tribunal  on  the  preliminary  question whether  the  workman  applying  under  Section  33-A  or  punished  for  whom approval  is  sought,  was  or  was  not  "concerned  workman"  in  the  pending  refer- ence  of  industrial  dispute.  The  decision  of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  in  the above  referred  case  has  been  rather  wrongly  interpreted.  That  was  a  case decided  when  the  position  pf  law  was  not  settled  and  somewhat  inconsistent views  had  been  taken  by  different  High  Courts  on  the  point.  The  leading  case of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  on  the  subject  namely,  New  India  Motors  (P) Ltd.  Vs.  Morris  (K.T.)  (1960/I-LLJ  p.  551)  had  probably  not  seen  Lhe light  of the  day  or  had  not  gained  sufficient  publicity  when  the  Central  Government Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  overruled  the  contention  of  the  employers  that the  Tribunal  should  determine  the  preliminary  question  whether  the  employee, D.  R.  Singh,  was or  was not  concerned  with  four  other  references  pending  before the  Tribunal.  The  view  taken  by  the  Tribunal  that  such  a  contention  could  not be  raised  by  the  employer  and  if  he  thought  that  Section  33  did  not  apply  he should  withdraw  the  application  and  take  the  consequences.  On  that  view,  the Tribunal  refused  to  entertain  the  plea  and  proceeded  to  deal  with  the  merits  of the  application.  The  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  disapproved  of  this  logic  of  the Tribunal  on the  eround  that  when  Inconsistent  views  had  been  taken  by  different High  Courts  such  a  stand  taken  by  the  Tribunal  was  illogical  and  unsatisfactory. The  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  clearly  re-affirmed  the  broader  construction  of  the word"  "workman  concerned  in  such  disnute"  as  dpeide.d  in  two  earlier  decisions name'y,  New  India  Motors  Private  Limited  Vs.  Morris  (K.T.)  (1960-I-LLJ  p. 651)  and  Digwadih  Colliery  Vs.  Ramjl  Singh  (1964-II-LLJ  p.  143).  Now  that a  broader  construction  has  been  unequivocally  enunlciated  and  reaffirmed  by the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court,  there  is  no  justification  left  for  employers  now to solicit  the advice  from  Tribunal  while  making  application!  under  Section  33(2)(b).

Smb.  S(ii))  THE  GA1ETTB  OF INDIA:  KOVEMBSk  IB, 10e7/£AHTIKA  27, itiBt  4399
It  is  of  course  open  to  them  to  oppose  an  application  under  Section  33-A  of  6 Workman  on  the  ground  that  he  was  not  a  concerned  workman  in  the  reference tinder  Section  10  I.D.  Act.  But  to  ask  the  Tribunal  to  determine  this  point  whe* ilhe  position  of  law  ia  clearly  stalled  and  well  settled  would  really  be  tentamoun* to  rendering  an  advice  on  a  question  which  ia  rather  a  mixed  question  of  law 
Since,  however,  the  question  has  been  debated,  it  is  necessary  to  analyse  and to  state  the  law  as  propounded  by  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court.  For  the.  first time,  the  question  came  to  be  considered  by  the  Hon'ble  Court  in  New  India Motors  case  (supra)  where  their  Lordships  examined  the  construction  of  the words  "workmen  concerned  in  such  dispute"  from  different  stand  points.  Th" Importance  of  the  definition  of  industrial  dispute  as  prescribed  in  Section  2(k) was  first  examined  and  emphasised.  It  was  then  pointed  out  under  Section  18(8) of  the  Act,  an  award  binds  not  only  parties  to  the  dispute  but  all  employees  in the  establishment.  The  object  of  enacting  Section  33  was  also  referred  in  thi" connection.  Lastly,  even  as  a  matter  of  construction  pure  and  simple  their Lordships  found  no  justification  for  assuming  that  the  workman  concerned  in Such  dispuie  must  be  workmen  directly  or  immediately  concerned  in  the  said dispute.  The  observation  in  the  following  passage  which  may  be  called  a  die- turn  on  the  point  is  pertinent:—•
"In  dealing  with  the  question  as  to  which  workmen  can  be  said  to  be concerned  in  an  industrial  dispute  we  have  to  bear  in  mind  the essential  condition  for  the  raising  of  an  industrial  dispute  itself  and if  an  industrial  dispute  can  be  raised  only  by  a  group  of  workmei* acting  on  their  own  or  through  their  union,  then  it  would  be  difll- cut  to  resist  the  conclusion  that  all  those  who  sponsored  the  dis- pute  are  concerned  in  it.  As  we  have  already  pointed  out,  this construction  is  harmonious  with  the  definition  prescribed  by  S.2(s) and  with  the  provisions  contained  in  S.18  of  the  Act.  Therefore,  we are  not  prepared  to  hold  that  the  expression  "workmen  concerned m  such  dispute"  can  be  limited  only  to  such  of  the  workmen  who are  directly  concerned  with  the  dispute  in  question.  In  our  opinion, that  expression  Includes  all  workmen  on  whose  behalf  the  dispute has  been  raised  as  well  as  those  who  would  be  bound  by  the  award which  may  be  made  in  the  said  dispute."
 
En  the  last  paragraph  their  Lordships  approved  of  the  construction  placed  by the  Labour  Appellate  Tribunal  in  Eastern  Plywood  Manufacturing  Company Ltd.  Vs.  Eastern  Plywood  Manufacturing  Workers'  Union  (1958-I-LLJ  620).  A lew  rulings  of  other  High  Courts  were  also  referred,  out  of  which  the  case  of Andhra  Scientific  Company  Ltd.  Vs.  Seshagiri  Rao  (A)  (by  Andhra  Scientific Company  Employees'  Union  (1959-II-LLJ.  717)  appears  to  be  a  misprint  as  tlu> case  does  not  at  all  deil  with  the  question.  Actually  another  case  Sri  Rama Sugars  & Industries  V.  Industrial  Tribunal  and  two  others  reported  at  page  71J of  the  same  volume  and  immediately  preceding  the  Andhra  Scientific  Company Ltd.  case  in  the  same  volume  deals  with  this  question  and  the  Andhra  High Court  at  page  716  preferred  the  broader  interpretation  following  the  Newron Studies  Ltd.  Vs.  Ethirajulu  (T.R.)  and  others  (1958-I-LLJ  p.  63)  which  also "fthis  discussed  question  and  adopted  the  broader  construction.  In  doing  so, guidance  was  taken  from  observations  of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  in  Auto- mobile  Product  of  India  Vs.  Rukmajiba  (1955-I-LLJ  p.  346)  regarding  the obiect  for  which  Section  33  of  the  I.D.  Act  was  enacted.  The  narrow  view adopted  by  the  Bombay  Hiffh  Court  in  New  Jnhangir  Vakil  Mills  Ltd.,  Bhava- . nagar  V.  N.  L.  Vyas  and  others  (1958-II-LLJ  573)  was  expressly  rejected  by the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  both  in  New  India  Motors  case  as  also  in  Tata  Iron  Ik Steel  Co.  case.  It  would  be  interesting  to  state  that  the  Bombay  High  Court also  considered  the  effect  of  Section  18  of  the  I.D.  Act,  but  held  that  the  award or  settlement  would  not  bind  the  whole  body  of  the  workmen  who  sponsored the  dispute  but  only  such  of  the  workmen  who  are  affected  and  are  working  in the  same  department.  The  three  concerned  workmen  in  that  case  belonged  to rinfrframe  Department  while  the  references  concerned  contain  other  workmen of  the  bleaching  department.  This  disii'Wnn  dr.iwn  by  the  Enmh.iv  Hitrh  Court apparently  was  not  approved  by  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  wh^e  rejecting the  narrower  view.  It  follows,  therefore,  that  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  haa laid  down  the  law  that  all  workmen  who  will  be  bound  bv  thf>  referen^e  under Section  10  of  I.D.  Act  would  be  the  person  concerned  in  the  dispute.  The  other

4340  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA : NOVEMBER  IS,  1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PA#T  U"
two  cases  of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  which  are  usually  referred  for  a  differ- ent  interpretation  are  Upper  Ganges  Valley  Electric  Supply  Co.  Ltd.  Moradabad Vs.  Srivastava  (G.S.)  reported  in  1963  (I)  LLJ  p.  237  and  DigwadUi  Colliery Vs.  Ramji  Singh  (1964-II-LLJ  p.  143).  In  the  former  case  while  considering  the question  of  pendency  of  certain  appeals  before  the  L.A.T.  their  Lordships  found that  only  one  appeal  was  pending  which  related  to  the  grant  of  annual  increment to  a  woikman  M.  K.  Varshney.  It  -was  casually  observed  that  the  same  was  an individual  dispute  in  respect  of  one  employee  and  so  the  present  respondent could  not  be  said  to  be  concerned  with  that  dispute.  Full  facts  about  that  appeal were  not  available  to  the  Hon'ble  Court  and  it  was  not  known  whether  the  dis- pute  regarding  Var^hney  had  or  had  not  been  espoused  by  uny  Union.  It  wan also  not  known  whether  the  employee  concerned  Srivaslava  had  any  connectiqn or  nexus  through  any  union  so  as  to  be  concerned  in  the  reierence  regarding Varshney.  The  observation  of  the  Hon'ble  Court,  therefore,  is  not  to  bo  inter- preted  literally  for  any  guidance.  The  Digwadih  case  is  only  an  authority  on the  point  that  a  workman  when  he  files  an  application  under  Section  33-A  has to  establish  that  he  was  concerned  in  the  dispute  under  reference.  The  com- plainant  in  that  case  had  made  no  averment  about  the  nature  of  the  said  db- pute  and  had  not  indicated  how  he  was  concerned  in  the  dispute under  reference.  On  the  other  hand,  the  company,  had  shown  that  the  reference reference  waa  on  behalf  of  the  chaprasis  and  watchmen  of  the  collieries  for overtime  wages  and  the  complainant  was  a  clerk  in  grade  III.  With  this  mani- fest  distinction  it  was  for  the  complainant  to  have  established  how  he  •was  con,- cerned  in  that  reference.  He  could  have  proved  it  by  showing  that  the  dis- pute  under  reference  regarding  Chaprasis  and  watchmen  was  sponsored  by  the union  of  which  he  was  a  member  and  was  thus  concerned  with  the  industrial dispute  or  that  he  was  one  of  the  workmen  who  had  raised  the  industrial  dis- pute.  In  the  absence  of  any  such  information,  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  held that  complainant  under  Section  33A  cannot  succeed  on  the  presumption  that the  reference  of  the  pending  industrial  dispute  must  necessarily  have  had  a nexus  with  the  complainant.  It  may  be  noticed  that  in  the  Tata  Iron  &  Steel  Co. case  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  observed  at  p.  123.  In  this  latter  case,  this Court  considered  the  conflicting  judicial  decisions  rendered  by  the  different  High Courts  and  has  approved  of  the  broader  construction  of  the  words  "workmen concerned  in  such  dispute".  The  word  "latter*  is  presumably  a  slip  for  "for- mer"  as  the  Hon'ble  Court  had  considered  the  conflicting  judicial  decisions  in New  India  Motors  case  and  had  approved  of  the  broader  construction.  The broader  construction  therefore  remains  reaffirmed  in  Tata  Iron  &  Steel  Company case.
 
After  the  Tata  Iron  &  Steel  Co.  case  the  Patna  High  Court  had  occasion  t" consider  the  rulings  of  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  as  also  one  other  ruling  of that  very  court  in  New  India  Sugar  Mills  Ltd.  case  which  is  not  yet  reported  in Labour  Law  Journal  but  has  been  so  done  by  Mines  and  Factories  Journal  in the  Issue  of  April,  1967,  at  page  494.  The  Patna  High  Court  adopted  the  broader construction  and  found  a  common  clue  as  nexus  between  the  reference  and  the workman  against  whom  approval  was  sought  under  Section  33 (2) (b)  inasmuch as  there  was  an  allegation  of  victimisation  in  both  cases  and  the  sponsoring union  was  the  same.  Such  an  approach  was  not  indicated  by  the  Hon'ble Supreme  Court  and  In  fact  may  be  Impossible  for  an  employer  to  anticipate what  would  be  the  averment  of  the  workman  against  whom  an  approval  is sought  or  in  fact  whether  he  would  at  a]l  be  represented  by  the  same  union  or any  union.  To  my  mind,  answer  to  the  question  while  determining  whether  a. workman  is  concerned  or  not  in  the  industrial  dispute  under  reference  rests  on the  principal  consideration  whether  the  said  workman  was  or  was  not  a  party directly  or  indirectly  through  the  Union  in  sponsoring  the  industrinl  dispute under  reference.  In  an  application  under  Section  33-A,  he  has  to  establish  the fact  himself  and  hi  an  application  for  approval  under  Section  33 (2) (b)  it  should already  be  known  to  the  employer  in  the  ordinary  course  whether  the  work- man  against  whom  approval  is  sought  was  or  was  not  concerned  in  sponsoring the  industrial  dispute  under  reference.  If  he  was,  he  is  a  concerned  workman, whatever  may  have  been  the  nature  of  the  Industrial  under  reference,  as  an award  in  that  reference  would  bind  him  also  along  with  the  other  workmen. But  if  he  was  not  in  any  way  connected  in  the  sponsoring  of  the  dispute  either through  the  Union  or  collectively  with  other  workmen  who  espoused  the  Indus- trial  dispute,  he  would  not  be  a  concerned  workman.  Such  a  position  can  easily be  envisaged  when  there  are  more  than  one  unions.  The  sponsoring  union  of an  industrial  dispute  under  reference  may  be  a  different  union  than  the  workman W*LO  applies  under  Section  33-A  or  against  whom  an  approval  is  sought  under Section  33(2) (b).  In  the  latter  case,  he  may  not  be  a  member  of  any  union  and oi  if  at  all  may  be  a  member  of  a  different  union.  In  such  a  case,  he  cannot  be called  to  be  workman  concerned  in  the  dispute.  In  this  connection,  it  is  pertinent

S ic  3 ( i i )]  T HE  G A Z E T T E*  OF  I N D I A:  . < > , ,"  . 1 8,  / KA  .  Ji  W,  .  •„
to  notice  the  amendment  now  made  as  Section  2-A  which  has  been  added  by  Act XV  of  1905-  Under  this  newly  added  section,  dismissal,  discharge,  or  retrench- ment  or  termination  of  service* of  an  individual  workman  shall  now  be  deemed to  be  an  industrial  dispute  notwithstanding  that  no  other  workman  nor  any  unioit of  workmen  is  a  party  to  the  dispute.  With  the  amended  law  a  workman  in  hie individual  capacity  can  now  raise  a  dispute  about  the  termination  of  his  service without  the  recourse  of  having  help  from  other  workmen  or  the  union.  If  such a  case  results  in  a  reference,  obviously  in  such  a  reference  another  workman against  whom  an  approval  is  sought  by  the  employer  under  Section  33(2)(b) would  not  be  a  concerned  workman  in  the  reference  as  the  imposition  of  the  term "industrial  dispute"  in  Section  2A  is  merely  flctitional  and  notional.  It  Is,  there- fore,  easv  to  demarcate  class  of  cases  in  which  a  particular  workman  would  be ,a  concerned  workman  or  would  not  be  so  during  the  pending  of  a  reference  under Section  10.  This  Is  what  I  conceive  to  be  the  state  of  law  as  enunciated  by  the Hon'ble  Supreme  Court.
(Sd.)  G.  C.  AQAKWALA,
Presiding  Officer,.
Industrial  Tribunal-cwm-Labour  Court  (Central),  Jabalpur. 25-7-"7.
ANNIXURE  C
(True  Copy)
Memorandum  of  Settlement  between  the  Management  of  Indian  Copper  Corpora- tion  Ltd.  and  their  workmen  of  Mosaboni  Manes  represented  by  the  Mosaboni Mines  Labour  Union,  in  respect  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  pending  adjudication before  the  Industrial  Tribunal-cum-Labour  Court  (Central)  at  Jabalpur. Names  of  Parties
Representing  the  Management  Representing  the  workmen
1.  Mr.  T.  C.  W.  H.  Blay,  Ag.M.S.  1.  Mr.  IL. B.  Singh  Arsi,  General  Sec-
\**\  retary,  M.M.L.U.
2.  Mr.  K.  Ramamoorthi—L.O.  2,  Mr.  S.  K.  Das.  Asst.  Secretary,
M.M.L.U.
3.  Mr.  S.  N.  Aditya,  Asst.  Secretary,
M.M.L.U.
Short  Recital  of  the  case:
Whereas  in  its  letter  No  MMLU/103/MS/64,  dated  3-10-G4  and  No.  MMIU/G- 3A(CO)/64-3,  dated  8th  November,  1964,  the  Mosaboni  Mines  Labour  Union  rais- ed  Industrial  Disputes  for  reinstatement  of  Sri  Bhupati  Sen  (Badge  No.  5998) and  for  supply  of  free  electricity  and  fuel  to  Sri  U.  C.  Patnaik  (Badge  No.  1706) respectively.
And  whereas  these  disputes  were  referred  by  the  Government  of  India  in  the Ministry  of  Labour,  Employment  and  Rehabilitation  to  the  Central  Government Industrial  Tribunal  for  adjudication.
And  whereas  during  the  pendency  of  the  aforesaid  references  before  the Industrial  Tribunal,  various  applications  u/s  33(2)(b)  and  u/s  33(3)(b)  of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act  have  been  made  by  the  Management  and  complaints u/s  33A  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act  have  been  made  by  certain  workmen.
And  whereas  the  aforesaid  two  References  are  pending  as  No.  72  of  1967  and No.  82  of  1967  before  the  Industrial  Tribunal-curo-Labour  Court  (Central)  at Jabalpur  and  the  cases  under  Sections  33  and  33A  I.D.  Act  are  alsn  pending before  the  same  Tribunal  and  numbered  as  detailed  in  the  Schedules  A'  and 'B'  annexed  hereto.
And  whereas  the  Parties  hereto,  with  a  view  to  create  better  understanding, promote  healthy  Industrial  Relations  and  maintain  Industrial  peace,  after  repeat- ed  discussions  have  arrived  at  an  amicable  settlemenl  on  this  Friday,  the  41h of  August  1SMS7 on  the  following  terms  and  conditions:—
Terms  of  settlement:
 
1,  In  the  main  Reference  case  No.  72  of  1967,  it  is  agreed  that  Sri  Bhupati Sen  shall  be  reinstated  as  a  special  case  and  is  allowed  one  month's  time  to

JAM  L OA  OV  A:  * I  .  .  .  18,  K  VKARTIXA  27,  1S89  p"jutT  11^
ittsurrte  duty.  The  Intervening  absence  from  the  date  of  Sri  Bhupati  Sen's  dis- KJISHBI  till  t he  date  of  his  r e s u m i ng  duly  u n d er  this  settlement  shall  be  treated Kg  special  leave  with  loss  of  all  benefits.  Sri  Bhupati  Sen's  wages  shall  be  Iho t a me  as  he  was  getting  at  t he  time  of  his  dismissal.
%, In  respect  of  t he  cases  u /a  33A  I.D.  Act,  it  is  agreed  as  follows:
(i)  Case  No.  IS  of  1967—The  complaint  of  Sri  Abdul  H a q ue  K h an  (B. N Q. 461/E)  shall  not  be  pressed  before  t he  Tribunal,
(Ji)  Case  No.  16  of  1967—Sri  Ganguli  Singh  (B.  No.  5055 / W W)  shall  be allowed  one  day  off  for  7th  J u n e.  1T65.  but  this  shall  not  form  a precedent.
(lii)  Case  No.  17  of  1967—The  complaint  of  Sri  J i t r ai  Mahali  (B.  No.  E22I) shall  not  be  Dressed  before  t he  Tribunal.
(lv)  Case  No.  18  of  1967—Sri  J.  N.  Bhattacharjee  (B.  No.  1400/E)  s h an  be given  a  special  Increment  of  42  Paise  with  effect  from  1st  August,  1967.
(v)  Case  No.  19  of  1967—Sri  S.  B.  B a r ua  (B.  No.  5724)  shall  be  paid  Act- ing  Allowance  for  18  days,  i.e.  from  22nd  F e b r u a r y,  1965  to  25th February,  1965  and  from  1st  March.  1965  to  14th  March,  1965. (vil  Case  No.  20  of  1967—The  complaint  of  Sri  M,  M.  Pati  (B.  No.  6236) shall  not  be  pressed  before  t he  Tribunal.
fvii)  Case  No,  21  of  1967—Sri  Periappa  Naidu  (B.  No.  7336)  shall  be  allow- ed  leave  for  t he  y e ar  1965.
fviii)  Case  No.  23  of  1967—Sri  R.  R a m s w a my  (B.  No.  3429)  shall  be  allowed leave  for  t he  y e ar  1965.
(ix)  Case  No.  24  of  1967—The  Warning  Chit  No.  24003  issued  to  Sri  R am Btlas  Singh  (B,  No.  3819)  for  absence  without  leave  for  2  days,  i.e. 18th  &  19th  of  November,  1966,  shall  be  cancelled.
3.  In  respect  of  t he  cases  u / ss  33(2)  (b)  a nd  33(3)  (b)  of  t he  I.D.  Act  It  I* a g r e ed  as  follows:—
(i)  Case  No.  18  of  1967—Management's  application  for  approval  of  dismis- sal  of  Sri  Mosu  (B.  No.  1228)  shall  not  be  opposed  before  the  T r i b u- nal.  However,  the  dismissal  shall  not  be  considered  as  a  b ar  against his  seeking  fresh  employment.
(ii)  Case  No.  20  of  19fl7—Sri  Muchi  Ram  (B.  No.  7582)  shall  be  re-employeW in  his  former  designation  (sweeper)  by  14th  September,  1967,  in  the usual  wav.
(iil)  Case  No.  27  of  1967—Sri  Dhananjpy  P a t or  (B.  No.  5619)  shall  be  r e- employed  in  his  former  designation  (Mucker)  by  14th  October,  1967, in  t he  usual  way.
(iv)  Case  No.  31  of  1967")  Sri  Muneswar  (B.  No.  6495)  shall  be  r e- Case  No.  35  of  19B7  i  employed  in  his  former  designation Case  No.  47  of  1967 J  ( T r a m m e r)  by  14-10-1C67  in  t he  usual  w&f. (v)  Case  No.  39  of  1967—The  Management's  application  for  approval  of  t he dismissal  of  Sri  Sk.  Munu  (B.  No.  5974)  shall  not  be  opposed  before t he  Tribunal.  However,  t he  dismissal  shall  not  be  considered  as  a b ar  against  his  seeking  fresh  employment,  and  he  m ay  apply  to  the Mines  Superintendent  for  consideration  of  his  re-employment.
(vi)  Case  No.  40  of  1967—Sri  B h u b an  N a r a y an  Deo  (B,  No.  7981)  shall  be re-employed  in  his  former  designation  (Timber  Mazdoor)  by  14th October,  1967,  in  the  usual  way.
fvii)  Case  No.  45  of  1967—The  Management's  application  for  approval  of  the action  t a k en  against  Sri  Shib  S h a n k ar  Nair  (B.  No.  7989)  shall  not be  opposed  before  t he  Tribunal.

(ix)  Case  No.  49  of  1T67—Sri  Abdul  K a r im  (B.  No,  4664)  shall  be  r e- employed  in  his  former  designation  (Mucker)  by  14th  October,  1967, in  t he  usual  way.
(x)  Case  No.  54  of  1967—Sri  Naiki  Hoe  (B.  No.  7722)  shall  be  r e - e m p l o y ed in  his  former  designation  (Timber  Mazdoor)  by  14th  October,  1987, in  the  usual  way.

Sue. 5(U)]  THE  OAZETTi  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1987/KARf IRA 8t,  iWO  M ft
(xi)  Case  No.  57  of  1967—Sri  Parmanand  Ghasi  (B.  No.  1811)  shall  be  re- employed  In  his  former  designation  (Sweeper)  by  14th  September, 1967,  in  the  usual  way,
(xii)  Case  No.  72  of  1967—Sri  Lai  Mohan  Sinch  (B.  No.  2237)  shiU  be  re- employed  in  his  former  designation  (Blaster  Helper)  by  14th  October, 1967,  in  the  usual  way.
(xiii)  Case  No.  76  of  1967—Punishment  of  4  days  suspension  Issued  to  Sri Sheo  Prasad  Singh  (B.  No.  1768)  for  absence  without  le.ave  in  the year  1966  shall  be  set  aside  but  the  final  warning  issued  for  the  same shall  stand.
(xiv)  Case  No.  78  of  1067—Sri  Phul  Chand  Pator  (B.  No.  770)  shall  be  re- employed  in  his  former  designation  (M.  Mazdoor)  by  14th  October, 1967,  In  the  usual  way.
(xv)  Case  No.  82  of  1967—Sri  Basudeo  PatOr  (B.  No.  8023)  shall  be  re- employed  in  his  former  designation  (U/G  Fitter,  Helper)  by  14th October,  1967,  in  the  usual  way.
(xvi)  Case  No.  84  of  1967—The  Management's  application  for  the  approval  of the  dismissal  of  Sri  Amulya  Rana  (B.  No.  4916)  shall  not  be  opposed before  the  Tribunal.  The  dismissal  however,  shall  not  be  a  bar against  his  Re-employment  and  Sri  Rana  may  apply  to  the  MinaB Superintendent  for  consideration  of  his  re-employment.
4.  The  parties  oould  not  agree  on  any  settlement  in  respect  of  the  main  Refer- ence  No,  82  of  1967,  ease  u/s  33A  I.D.  Act  No.  22  of  1967  and  the  cases  u/s  33 1,D.  Act,  No.  24  of  1967.  No,  59  of  1967,  No,  60  of  1967,  No,  61  of  1967,  No,  62  of 1967,  No.  68  of  1967  and  No.  69  of  1967  which  remain  unsettled  to  be  decided  by the  Tribunal.
5.  All  other  applications  u/s  33  I.D.  Act  pending  before  the  Tribunal  and  not settled  hereto  before  shall  not  be  opposed  or  contested  before  the  Tribunal  and shall  be  decided  in  favour  of  the  Management.
6.  Both  the  parties  shall  jointly  apply  to  the  Industrial  Tribunal-cwm-Labour Court  (C),  Jabalpur,  to  take  this  settlement  on  record  and  dispose  of  the  case* settled  herein  in  terms  of  this  compromise.
Witnesses:  1,  Representing  the  Management. (Sd.)  M.  N.  SAHAI.
(Sd.)  T.  C.  W.  H.  BLAY.
(Sd.)  MOHAHAK  AHMAD.
(Sd.)  It,  RAMAMOORTHL
Dated:  4th  August  1907.  2.  Representing  the  Union. Mosaboni  Mines.
(Sd.)  H.  B.  SINGH A M I. (Sd.)  S.  N.  ADITYA. (Sd.)  S.  K.  DAS.
ANNIXUM  "D"
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-Ct/M- LABOUR  COURT,  JABALPUR  (Camp:  Ghatsila)
RE:  CASE  NO.  72  OP  1967  (U/B  10  I.D.  ACT)
Indian  Copper  Corporation  Limited.
Versus
Their  Workmen,
It  is  respectfully  submitted  as  follows  on  behalf  of  the  abovenamed  Corpora- tion:—
1.  That  a  settlement  dated  4th  August,  1967,  has  been  filed  in  the  above
case  on  22nd  August,  1967.
 
2.  That  the  Settlement  is  voidable  in  as  much  it  was  made  under  a  false representation  by  the  Union's  General  Secretary,  Sri  H.  B.  Singh

4344  T*IE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [FAJIT  I I-
'Arsi',  that  he  had  the  letters  of  Authority  from  the  workmen  con- cerned  to  compromise  all  cases  and  the  Corporation  agreed  to  the Settlement  only  because  thereby  almost  all  the  cases  were  amicably settled  and  the  Corporation  was  saved  from  the  botheration  and expenses  of  producing  evidence  In  these  cases.
3.  That  on  the  hearing  on  29th  August,  1967,  it  was  found  that  the  Union has  filed  letters  of  Authority  in  26  caaes  only  with  the  result  that the  Corporation  has  been  left  to  produce  evidence  In  almost  all  cases, the  total  number  of  cases  being  about  200.
4.  That  out  of  26  cases  in  which  the  Union  has  filed  the  Authority,  majority of  the  cases  are  such  in  which  the  Corporation  has  granted  some concession.
5.  That  the  above  facts  clearly  show  that  the  Union's  representatives deceived  the  Corporation's  representatives  and  obtained  the  Settle- ment  by  misrepresentation.
It  is  therefore,  prayed  that  the  Settlement  being  voidable  at  the  Corpora- tion's  discretion,  may  kindly  be  treated  as  null  and  void  and  the  case  mty kindly  be  disposed  of  on  merits.
For  Indian  Copper  Corporation  Limited.
Ghatflila, Date:  30-8-87.
Sd/-  IUegible, Ag.  General  Manager.
Part  of  Award
[No.  24/26/64-LRL]
S'O.  4088.—In  pursuance  of  section  17 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 of 1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the  In dm- trial  Tribunal.  Jabalpur,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in  rela- tion  to  the  Tirodi  Manganese  Mines  of  Messrs  Kasturchand  Oswal  and  their workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  2nd  November, JM7.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUAf- LABOUR  COURT,  JABALPUR. Dated  October  26,  1987.
PRESENT:
Sri  G.  C.  Agarwala,—Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  NO.  CGIT/LC(5)  OF  1067.
PAHTOCS:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Tirodi  Manganese  Mines  of  Messrs.  Kastur- chand  Oswal,  Mine  Proprietor  Seoni  (M.P.).
Versus
Their  workmen  through  The  Secretary,  Samyukta  Khadan  Mazdoor  Sangh, P.O.  Tirodi  (M.P.).
APPIAHAKCIB:
For  employers.—Sri  Kastur  Chand,  Proprietor  of  the  firm. For  workmen.—Sri  P.  K.  Thakur,  Vice  President,  Samyukta  Khadan  Maz- door  Sangh,  P.O.  Tirodi.  Seonl  (M.P.),
INDUSTRY:  Manganese  Mine:  DISTRICT:  Seoni  (M.P.).
AWARD
By  Notification  No.  35/27/66-LRI  dated  10th  February,  1967  the  Ministry  of Labour  and  Eruploysnent  referred  the  following  matter  of  dispute  between  Tirodi Mines  of  M/s.  Kastur  Cliani  Oswal  Mines  Proprietor  Seoni,  and  their  workmen under  Section  10  i.D.  Act,  f>,r  adjudication,  to  this  Tribunal:
Matter  of  Dispute.
"Whether  the  management  of  Tirodi  Mines  of  Messrs  Kasturchand  Oswal, Minos  Proprietors,  Seoni  (Madhya  Pradesh)  waa  justified  in  stopping Shrl  Bhaudas  Battle  from  work  with  effect  from  the  30th  March, 1964?
If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?

-  -  *°  •  ,  '  >
"  2.  The  case  has  remained  Bending  because  of  the  repeated  defaults  on  the  part qf  tho  employer  who  is  one  Sri  Kastur  Chand  Oswal  himself.  After  usual  notice when  a  proper  statement  was  not  received  from  the  employer  an  ex-parte  order was  recorded  on  30th  March,  1967,  which  was  set  aside  on  payment  of  Rs,  25  as costs  on  17th  April,  1967,  and  on  which  date  a  statement  of  claim  was  filed. After  rejoinders,  an  additional  issue  was  framed  on  6th  May,  1967,  which  runs  as follows:—
Addl.  Issue
Whether  the  workman,  Bhaudas  Bagde,  himself  abandoned  employment  or was  he  denied  work  by  the  employers  without  justification?
3.  The  emplover  again  absented  on  the  date  of  hearing  which  wag  30th  May, 1967,  and  on  5th  June,  1967  ex-vnrte  evidence  was  recorded.  Before,  however, award  could  be  recorded  the  employer  on  26th  June,  1967,  aeain  anpiied  for setting  aside  ex-parte  order  and  on  payment  of  Rs.  50  as  costs  on  16th  September, 1987,  he  was  allowed  appea-ance.  On  Ihe  next  date  of  hearing  which  was  23rd October,  19fi7,  Sri  Kastur  Chand  aepin  defaulted  and  sent  a  representation  stating that  he  had  not  to  produce  any  evidence  and  that  a  date  for  arguments  be  given. Arguments  were  thereafter  heard  on  26th  October,  1967,  from  both  sides.
4  The  short  dispute  is  that  the  workman,  Bhaudas  Bagde,  was  a  permanent employee  on  a  monthly  pay  of  Rs.  60  from  29th  May,  1962.  Since  the  mine  was closed  his  services  were  terminated  on  30th  October,  1962.  He  was  again  re- em pi oved  on  1st  October,  1963,  according  to  employer  on  weekly  wages  of  Rs.'lO till  30th  March,  1P64,  according  to- the  Union,  Samyukta  Khadan  Mazdoor  Sangh, which  sponsored  the  dispute  his  services  were  terminated  on  this  date,  whereas according  to  employer  he  himself  abandoned  employment  and  ceased  to  appear. It  was  further  alleged  by  the  employer  that  the  workman  had  been  paid  B.3. 30 as  an  advance.  The  mine  sometime  after  30th  March,  1964,  was  closed  and therefore  according  to  the  employer  there  was  no  question  of  giving  him  employ- ment.
Finding: —
5.  Since  tho  dispute  relates  only  from  the  date  30th  March,  1064,  since  when the  workman,  Bhaudas  Gupta,  has  admittedly  not  been  in  employment  the  only Question  for  determination  is  whether  he  had  himself  been  absenting  and  aban- doned  employment  or  the  employer  terminated  his  services.  The  workman  con- cerned  Bhaudas  Bagde,  gave  his  ex-parte  evidence  in  which  he  stated  that  he was  acain  re-emnloved  oti  lit  October,  1963,  not  on  weekly  basis  but  on  the •monthly  pay  of  Rs  60  per  month  when  he  himself  did  not  abandon  employment but  Sri  Kasturcband  refused  to  take  him  further  in  emp'ovment  There  is  no rebutting  evidence  to  this  effect  on  the  part  of  the  employer  That  Bbaufas Bagde  was  in  employment  tiU  30th  March,  1964,  is  proved  by  the  document  filed by  the  employer  himself  (Ex.  E / l)  and  m  which  the  receipt  of  Rs.  30  as advance  was  admitted  by  Rhoudas.  . Tn  the  absence  of  any  evidence  to  the  con- trary  the  statement  of  Bhaudas  will  have  to  be  accepted  that  he  was  denied emplovment  after  this  date  and  the  case  of  the  employer  that  Bhaudas  himself S S ed  coming  cannot  be  accepted  It  will  further  have  to  be  believed that  he  was  not  employed  on  weekly  but.  on  a  monthlv  rjav  of  Rs.  60.  n  was, however  admitted  on  behalf  of  the  Unioi  by  Sri  P.  K.  Thakur  that  the  mine waT  closed'sometmie  in  19fi5.  There  is,  therefore,  no  question  of  his  reinstate- ment  The  date  of  closure  of  the  mine  has,  however,  not  corne  in  evidence. ConVequentlv  Bhaudas  would  he  entitled  to  his  back  wages  till  the  date  of  the c We  of  the  mine  minus  Us.  30  received  by  him  as  advance  ;;nd  thereafter  from the  date  of  the  closure  retrenchment  compensation  und^r  Section  25F  read  uith Section  25FFF  I D  Act  and  to  which  the  Union  representative  conceded  as  only admissible  relief  to  the  workman  concerned.
Decision:—
„ The  termination  of  employment  of  the  workman  concerned,  Ehau^as,  was unjustifiedI  He  shall  be  entitled  to  his  wages  @  Rs.  B0  per  month  with  efTeqt Cm  30th'March,  1964  minus  Rs.  30  which  had  been  received  as  advance  by  him till  the  date  of  the  closure  of  the  mine.  Thereafter  he  would  be  entitled  to  re tfichmentcompensation  in  accordance  with  law  There  is  no  question  of  re- mitatement  as  the  mine  stands  closed.  No  order  for  costs.
(Sd.)  G.  C.  AGAHWALA,
Presiding  Officer.
26-10-1967.
 
[No.  35/27/66-LRI.]

S.O.  4089—In  pursuance  of  Section  17  of  the  Industrial  -Disputes  Act, 1947 (14  of  1947)  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award of  tho  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal.  Dhanbad  in  the  Ijirljisl''!-'il dispute  between  the  management  of  the  Dehri  Rohtas  Light  Railway  Co., Ltd., DaJmianagar  and  their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Govern- ment  on  the  27th  October. 1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL AT  DHANBAD
Tn  (he matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes Act, 1947.
RETTRENCE  NO.  35  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Dehri-Rohtas  Light  Railway  Co. Ltd., Dalnnia- nagar.
AND
Their  Workmen.
PRESENT:
Shri  Kamla  Sahai,  Presiding  Officer,
APPEARANCES:
For  the. Employers—Shri  R,  N,  Sarkar,  Chief  Engineer. Far  the  Workmen—Shri  Ramdeo.  Sinha,  General  Secretary,  Rohtas  Light Railways  Employees'  Union,  Dalmianagar.
STAT-E:  Bihar.
INDUSTRY:  Coal.
Patna,  dated  the  IHth  October  1907
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Dehri-Rohtas  Light  Railway  Co. Ltd Dalminagar  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the  matters  speciiicd  in  the  sche- dule,  emoted  below,  has  made  this  reference  under  clause  fdi  of  sub-section (1)  of  Section  10 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947 (14  of  1947),  vid'  order No.  2/40/66-LR.IV,  dated  25th  March, 1967.
SCIIKDULE
(a)  Whether  the  dismissal  of  Shri  Deonandan  Prasad,  Chargeman,  Derm- Rohtas  Light  Railway  Workshop,  Dalmianager  with  effect  from  25th January,  1966 by  the management  of the said  workshop  is justified ?
(b)  If  not  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled ?"
2  All  the  parties  concerned  have  entered  into  a  compromise-  The management  df  the  Dehri-Rohtas  Light  Railway  Co.  Ltd.,  Dalmianagar and  the  General  Secretary  of  the  Dehrl  Rohtas  Ll#ht  Railways  Employees' Union.  Dalmianafiar  signed  and  filed  the  compromise  petition.  Notice  was  given to  them  to  appear  before  me  today  and  they  were  also  informed  that  the em- ployee  concerned,  Deonandan  Prasad,  Chargeman,  had  not  put  his  signature on  the  compromise  petition.  In  response  to  the  notice,  the  CbJef  Engineer  of the  company  has  appeared  today  on  behalf  of  the  employers  and  the  General Secretary  on  behalf  of  the  union,  Shri  Deonandan  Prasad,  the  Chargeman, has  also  appeared.  They  have  stated  before  me  that  they  have  entered  into the  compromise  and  Shri  Deonandan  Prasad  has  also  put  his  signature  on the minutes  of  the  compromise.  The  compromise  seems  to  be  very  fair  because  the management  had  agreed  to  reinstate  Shri  Deonandan  Prasad  in  his  original  post with  effect  from  the  date  on  which  he  reports  for  duty  and  it  has  also  agreed to  pay  him  a  lump  sum  of  Rs.  3,500  only  in  l*eu  of  his  agreeing  to  be  treated as  on  leave  without  wages  during  the  period  from  the  date  of  his  removal  from service  upto  the  date  on  which  he  reports  for  duty.  The  compromise,  Is,  there- fore,  recorded  and  award  is  made  accordingly.  The  compromise  memo  is  mark- ed  as  annexure  'A'  and  made  a  part  of  the  award.  Let  it  bp  submitted  to the Central  Government  in  accordance  with  Section  15  of  the  Industrial  Disputes Act. 1947.
 
(Sd.)  IOMT.A  SAHAI,  Presiding  Officer,

SEC.  3(ii)j  JHE  GAZETIE  OF  INDIA.  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/K.ARTIKA  27,  1889  4347
Memorandum  of  Settlement  arrived  at  between  the  Management  of  the Dehri  Rohtas  Light  Railway  Co-  Ltd  ,  and  their  workmen  represented  by Denri  RohiaE  Light  Railway  Employees  Union  in  the  matter  of  discharge  of Shri  Deo"andan  Prasad  with  effect  from  the  25th  January,  1966  vide  Manage- ment's  Office  Order  No.  74  dated  the  25th  January,  1966.
PRESENT:
Representing  Management:
(1)  Mr.  R.  N.  Sarkar,  Chief  Engineer.
D.R.L.R.  Company,  Ltd.,  Dalmianagar.
(2)  Mr.  G.  K.  Jain,  Personnel  Officer.
D.  R.  L.  Rly-  Company  Lid-,  Daimianagai.
Representing  Workmen:
(1)  Shri  M.  K.  Sinha,  General  Secretary,
Hind  Mazdoor  Sabha,  Bihar.
(2)  Shri  Ramdeo  Sinha.  General  Secretary,  Dehri  Rohtas  Light  Railways Employees  Union,  Dalmianagar.
The  m a t t er  regarding  discharge  of  Shri  Deonandan  P r a s ad  with  effect  from 25th  J a n u a ry  1966 vide  Management's  order  No. 74  dated  t he  25th  J a n u a ry 1966,  was  discussed  a nd  in  t he  interest  of  industrial  peace  and  h a r m o ny  it  is a g r e ed  as  follows :—
(i)  That  t he  Management  agrees  to  reinstate  Shri  Deonandan  Prasad  in his  original  post  w i th  effect  from  t he  date  he  reports  for  duty.
(ii)  That  from  t he  date  of  his  removal  from  service  till  t he  date  of  his reporting  for  duty  he  shall  be  treated  as  on  leave  w i t h o ut  wages.
(iii)  That  as  a  gesture  of  good  will  t he  Management  agrees  to  p ay  a  l u mp sum  of  Rs.  3500  (Rupees  t h r ee  thousand  five  h u n d r e d)  only.
That  t he  parties  agree  to  jointly  file  a  copy  of  this  agreement  to  the  I n d u s- trial  Tribunal  ( C ),  Dhanbad  with  request  that  t he  Tribunal  be  pleased  to  give a  consent  a w a rd  in  this  dispute  accordingly.
WOT  D.R.L.  Railway  Employees  Union:—For  D.R.L.  Railway  Company  Ltd. (Sd.)  M.  K.  S I N HA
(Sd.)  R.  N.  SARKAR,
(Sd.)  RAMDEO  SINHA.  13th  J u n e,  1967-
13th  J u n e,  1967.
(Sd.)  G.  K.  J A I N,
I3&  J u n e, 1967-
True  Copy
(Sd.)  DEONANDAN  PRASAD,  G.  K.  J A I N, concerned  Employee,
Personnel  Officer,
3S-1O-EJ7  D.  R.  L.  Railway  Company  Ltd.  Dalmianagar.
RAMBEO  S I N H A,
General  Secretary.
D.  R.  L.  Railway  Employees  Union,  Dalmianagar.
D a t ed  the  20th  July,  1967.
[No.  2/40/66-LRIV.]
S.O.  4090—-In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes,  Act, 1947 (14  of  1947)  t he  Central  G o v e r n m e nt  h e r e by  publishes  t he  following  a w a rd  of t he  National  Industrial  Tribunal,  Calcutta  in  t he  industrial  dispute  b e t w e en the  employers  in  relation  to  the  management,  of  t he  Indian  Cable  Company Limited,  Calcutta  and  their  w o r k m en  which  w as  received  by  t he  Central  G o v- e r n m e nt  on  2nd  November,  1967.

.  _„,  ,  iv.  1KA  XI,  ,  [PART  II—
NATIONAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL,  CALCUTTA
REFERENCE  NO.  NIT-3  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  management  of  the  Indian  Cable  Company Limited,  Calcutta.
AND
Their  workmen.
PRESENT :
Shri  S.  K.  Sen,  Presiding  Officer,
APPEARANCES:
On  behalf  of  Employers—Shri  J.  N.  Chatterjec,  Legal  Adviser. On  behalf  of  Workmen— Shri  D.  L.  Sen  Gupta,  Advocate  along  with  Shri M-  M.  Sana,  Advocate  for  Indian  Cablq  Company  Ltd.,  Calcutta Employees  Union  and  I.C.C,  Employees  Union,  Madras  and  Shri  Ram Sen  for  I.C.C,  Employees  Federation  representing  Unions  Nos,  3,  4, 5,  6  and  7  in  the  Order  of  Reference.
INDUSTRY:  Coble.
AWARD
By  Order  No.  17/1/67-LRIII  dated  23rd  June,  1067,  the  Central  Govern- ment  referred  for  adjudication  an  industrial  dispute  between  the  management Of  the  Indian  Cable  Company  Limited,  Calcutta,  and  their  workmen  in  respect of  the  matter  specified  in  the  following  schedule ;
"What  should  be  the  quantum  of  bonus  payable  to  the  Woikmen  of  the Indian  Cable  Company  Limited,  Calcutta  for  the  accounting  year .1905-66 ?"
2.  The  Indian  Cable  Company  occupies  a  prominent  position  in  the  Cable industry  of  India.  Its  Head  Office  is  at  Calcutta  and  its  factory  is  at  Jamshed- pur.  There  are  branch  offices  in  other  important  cities  of  India,  e.g.,  Bombay, Madras,  Now  Delhi,  Kanpur,  Nag^ur,  Ahmedabarl  and  Bangalore.  Apart  from insulated  cables,  the  company  also  manufactures  Aluminium  Roda,  Radio- Aerials,  Fuse  wires  and  other  products,  The  paid  up  capital  of  the  company is  Rs.  2,48,65,450.  The  total  number  of  workmen  employed  is  over  5,000,  and for  the  accounting  year  19G5-66,  the  gross  effective  salaries  and  wages  come  to Rs-  105,32.800,  vide  Ext.  E4.  The  Company's  accounting  year  is  from  1st  April to  31st  March  of  the  next  calendar  year.  For  the  accounting  year  1064-65  the company  declared  and  paid  out  bonus  at  20  per  cent  to  all  employees  in  accord anc:  with  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Ad-  1965.  For  the  accounting  year  19(55-66 the  company  declared  bonus  at  13:51  per  cent.  The  workmen  were  dis-satisfied. with  lite  offer  of  bonus  of  13.51  per  cent  and  refused  to  accept  the  bonus  and raised  an  industrial  dispute.  Thereafter  Ihcre  was  an  agreement  between  the company  and  the  All  India  I.C.C.  Employees  Federation  on  24Lh  November.  '%fi by  which  it  was  agreed  that  the  workmen  would  accept  the  bonus  offered  at 13.51  per  cent  but  the  question  of  additional  bonus  for  the  same  accounting  year would  be  referred  to  a  tribunal.  In  accordance  with  that  agreement  the  dis- pute  has  been  referred  to  the  tribunal.  According  to  the  unions  including  the Employees'  Federation,  the  computation  of  the  allocable  surplus  has  not  been done  by  the  company  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  payment  of Bonus  Act,  1965,  and  several  items  of  expenditure  must  be  added  back  to  arrive at  the  actual  gross  profits.  Further,  according  to  the  unions  the  company spent  a  large  amount  for  payment  of  liability  of  future  years  and  such  expen- diture  must  also  be  adder!  bank  to  ascertain  the  gross  profits.  Other  objections were  raised  by  the  unions  which  will  be  considered  in  due  course.
3.  According  to  the  company  its  accounts  for  the  financial  year  1965-66  were audited  by  a  reputed  firm  of  auditors,  Messrs  Lovelock  and  Lewes,  and  compu- tation  of  the  allocable  surplus  was  made  strictly  in  accordance  with  the  sche- dules  of  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act.  The  company  denied  the  allegations  made by  the  unions  that  in  order  to  reduce  the  quantum  of  bonus  the  company  had wrongfully  paid  out  money  on  account  of  future  liability  or  had  Incurred  or shown  expenditure  which  had  no  connection  with  the  business  of  the  company. The  Company  In  its  replies  to  the  interrogatories  filed  by  the  two  of  the unions  supplied  the  information  asked  for  by  the  unions.

SEC.  3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  21, 1889  434^
4.  The  annual  accounts  and  balancesheet  of  the  company  for  the  year  ended -31st  March,  1986  is  Ext.  A  and  the  computation  of  the  allocable  surplus  on  the basis,  of  which  bonus  at  13.5]  per  cent  was  declared  is  Ext.  E  with  Ext  E3 The  company  has  filed  a  copy  of  the  Income  Tax  assessment  order  tor  the accounting  year  ]! 65-1)6,  being  Ext.  B.  The  unions  filed  two  computation  state- ments,  Ext.  3  and  3A  to  indicate  their  claim  and  in  the  course  of  arguments several  other  computations  made  by  the  unions  were  filed  as  part  of  the  argu- ments  .H  is  necessary  1o  consider  the  points  in  dispute  one  by  one  in  older to  bo  able  to  work  out.  what  should  be  the  quantum  of  bonus  for  the  account- ing  year  1965-G6.
 
5.  The  first  disputed  item  is  an  expenditure  of  Rs.  18,24,047  being  payment made  to  retiring  workmen  of  Jamshedpur  workshop  under  a  voluntary  retire- ment  scheme.  A  copy  o£  the  voluntary  retirement  scheme  is  Kxl.  G.  It  states that  the  company  has  been  suffering-  from  acute  shortage  dt  imported  raw materials  for  which  licence  could  not  be  obtained  owing  to  the  foreign  exchange crisis,  and  so  the  production  could  not  be  maintained  at  the  past  levol  in  the foreseable  future  nnd  I'nat  it  was  therefore  necessary  substantially  to reduce  the  number  of  workmen  in  Ihe  workshop.  Thereafter  the  voluntary  re- tirement  scheme  is  set  out  offering  substantial  benefits  to  workmen  who  would retire  voluntarily,  namely  ex-gvntia  payment  equal  to  retrenchment  compensa- tion,  under  Sec.  25F  of  tht.  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  gratuity  admissible  at the  rate  of  half  a  month's  wages  for  every  completed  year  of  service,  and  a special  gratuity  as  compensation  for  premature  retirement,  at  18  months'  wages for  those  who  have  served  Ihe  company  continuously  for  a  period  exceeding 20  years,  27  months'  wages  lor  those  who  have  served  the  company  continuously for  a  period  exceeding  15  years  upto  and  including  20  years  and  36  months' wages  to  those  who  have  served  the  comoany  continuously  for  a  period  upin  and including  15  years.  According  1n  the  evidence  of  Shri  11. N.  Gupta,  Accountani, examined  on  behalf  of  the  management,  about  450  workmen  availed  of  the voluntary  retirement  scheme  and  a  sum  of  Rs,  18,24,047  was  paid  out  to  them. In  the  Profit  and  Loss  Account  this  item  is  not  shown  separately  but  is  in- cluded  in  the  item,  ''Salary.  Wages,  Bonus  and  Retiring  gratuities"  at  page  19 of  Ext.  A.  In  the  reply  to  interrogatories  which  has  heen  "mnrked  Ext.  H  there is  a  break-up  given  of  the  item,  'Salary,  Wages,  Bonus  and  Retiring  Gratuities' and  this  payment  of  Rs.  18,24,047  is  mentioned  os  a  sub-iiem  therein.  Apart from  the  special  benefits  offered  in  the  voluntary  retirement  scheme,  the  com- pany  has  a  system  of  a  retiring  gratuity  which  is  paid  to  workmen  when they  retire  at  the  age  of  60  years  which  is  fixed  as  the  normal  retiring  age  for workmen  as  well  as  other  t-rnployees.  Ext,  H  shows  that  durinir  the.  year 1965-66  normal  retiring  gratuities  came  only  of  Rs.  1.21  lakhs.  The  unions have  urged  that  the  sum  of  Rs.  18.24  lakhs  paid  under  the  voluntary  retirement scheme  to  about  450  workmen  represents  payment  of  retiring  gratuities  which would  normally  be  spread  over  8  to  10  years,  and  thus  the  company  paid  dur- ing  the  financial  year  19G5-6G  its  liabilities  for  a  number  of  future  years,  and in  addition  the  cm-nnnnv  nv_"Jp  a-n  extrn  npvment  under  thp  =chemt!,  viz..  "om- ponsation  or  special  gratuity  which  the  company  was  not  bound  to  pay.  Now, this  voluntary  retirement  scheme  was  adopted  by  the  company  in  place  of  re- trenchment  which  the  company  would  otherwise  have  to  do.  The  company  pre- ferred  this  course  because  if  it  resorted  In  retrenchment  the  company  would  hove to  discharge  the  juniormost  men  under  the  principle  'last  come  first  go'  where- as  under  the  voluntary  retirement  scheme  the  company  could  allow'  the  more senior  men  to  retire  and  reLain  the  younger  batch  of  workmen  in  service.  Fur- ther,  an  order  of  major  retrenchment  in  the  workshop  was  likely  to  create  lab- our  trouble  whereas  when  people  retired  with  •uihitnntinl  benefits  unrTr-L-  the voluntary  retirement  scheme  they  would  not  be  likelv  to  make  any  trouble  and in  fact  they  did  not  make  any  trouble.  The  expenditure  was  incurred  within the  financial  vear  lf)65-6fl.  Even  if  retrenchment  were  done,  retrenchment  com- pensation  and  normal  gratuity  would  bnvc  Ui  be  paid  and  that  would  nlso  be an  cxne-nditure  incurred  during  the  year  1965-66.  The  exDenditure  could  r.ot be  spread  over  a  number  of  year.  As  regards  the  special  compensation  which the  company  was  not  bound  to  pay  but  which  the  company  paid  only  to  in- duce  a  larger  number  of  workmen  to  retire,  this  may  be  considered  a  Daymen! under  Sec." 37  Sub-section  (1)  of  the  Income  Tax  Act,  1981.  Sub-section  (U of  Section  37  of  the  Income  Tax  Act  tirovldes  that  an  expenditure  which  is not  an  expenditure  of  the  nature  described  in  sections  SO  to  36  and  is  not  In the  nature  of  capital  expenditure,  which  is  made  wholly  and  exclusively  for -the  purpose  of  the  business,  is  allowed  as  a  deduction  in  computing  the  taxable income.  What  is  an  expenditure  wholly  and  exclusively  for  the  purpose  of •the  business  has  been  explained  by  a  number  of  judicial  decisions.  Among

4350  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18.  I9fi7/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [P\RT  le-
athers  reference  may  be  made  to  AIR  1951  SC  278  (Eastern  Investments  Limited V.  Commissioner  of  Income,  Wcjt.  Bengal).  In  that  case  Lhe  Supreme  Court held  after  discussing  a  number  of  English  Rulings  that  in  the  absence  of  any evidence  of  fraud,  it  was  enough  to  show  that  the  money  was  spent  on  the ground  of  commercial  expediency  and  in  order  indirectly  to  facilitate  the  curry- ing  on  of  the  business.  That  case  was  not  a  case  of  retiring  workmen  by offering  them  compensation  as  an  inducement  to  retire,  but  that  was  a  case  of issue  of  debentures  of  the  value  of  50  lakhs  at  5  per  cent  for  cancelling  ordi- nary  shares  of  the  face  value  of  50  lakhs.  Tn  the  year  following  the  issue  of debentures,  the-  ordinary  shares  earned  n dividend  o£  3}  per  cent  only  find  there- fore  the  action  of  the  Directors  in  issuing  debentures  at  5  per  cent  in  order to  cancel  shares  of  an  equal  value  was  challenge,  but  it  was  held  that  no  fraud having  been  proved,  the  transaction  must  be  deemed  to  have  bern  made  on the  ground  of  commercial  expediency  and  in  order  to  facilitate  the  carrying on  of  business  and  so  the  extra  interest  on  the  debentures  was  an  expenditure for  which  a  deduction  might  be  allowed  under  Sec.  12  Sub-Section  (2)  of  the Income  Tax  Act  1922  which  corresponds  to  Sec.  37  Sub-Section  (1)  of  the  1961 Act.  In  the  present  case  also  it  must  be  held  that  the  payment  of  compensa- tion  to  induce  workmen  to  retire  prematurely  was  an  expenditure  made  on the  ground  of  commercial  exneriienry  and  in  order  to  facilitate  1he  carrying on  of  the  business.  Accordingly  it  was  an  expenditure  allowable  under  Section 37(1)  of  the  Income  Tax  Act.  It  was  not  an  expenditure  of  a  capital  nature. There  is  no  reason  therefore  why  the  amount  of  this  expenditure  should  be  add- ed  back  for  computing  gross  profits.
6.  Next,  there  is  the  question  whether  an  ex-gratia  payment  of  Rs.  2.65  lakhs made  to  certain  employees  drawing  emoluments  exceeding  Rs.  750  p.m.  for the  year  1964-65  should  be  nddert  back  for  determining  gross  nrnnt.  On  h"*""lf of  the  unions  Shri  S.  N.  Banerjee,  a  Secretarial  Assistant  at  the  Head  Office drawing  about  Rs.  1000  per  month  produced  the  notice  when  he  received  on account  of  the  ex-gratia  payment  for  1064-65.  The  notice  is  Ext.  1.  It  states that  the  Directors  hnvine  reviewed  thp  service  rendered  bv  Shri  Banerjee  to the  company  in  the  financial  year  1964-65  and  the  emoluments  drawn  bv  him have  the  pleasure  in  sanctioning  an  ex-gratia  payment  of  Rs.  90  to  him  in token  of  his  work  during  19(54-65.  Shri  Banerjee  stated  that  in  addition  he received  the  bonus  under  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act;  for  the  purpose  of  bonus his  pay  was  deemed  to  be  Rs.  750  per  month  or  Rs.  9,000  per  annum  In  accor- dance  with  the  provisions  of  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act.  This  ex-gratia  pay- ment  according  to  Shri  Banerjee  was  paid  in  lieu  of  bonus  calculated  on  the difference  in  emoluments  drawn  by  him  and  the  ceiling  of  Ra.  750  p.m.,  as previously  bonus  calculated  on  the  entire  emoluments  used  to  be  paid  to  the higher  paid  officers  and  assistants  before  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act  came  Into for-c  wWli  set  a  ceiling  of  Hs.  750  rier  month  for  the  calculation  of  bo"ii9.  On behalf  of  the  management  Shri  R.  N.  Gupta  .gave  the  figure  of  Rs.  2.65  lakhs aa  the  total  of  the  ex-gratia  payments  made  for  the  year  1964-65.  He  stated  that thia  ex-gratla  payment  was  made  to  employees  drawing  above  Rs.  750  per  month. He  however  denied  the  suggestion  that  it  was  paid  to  compensate  such  employee* for  the  loss  In  bonus  which  they  suffered  on  account  of  provisions  of  the  Pay- ment  of  Bonus  Act.  He  stated  that  the  payment  was  an  ad-hoc  ex-gratia  pay- ment  and  was  made  by  the  managing  Director  at  his  own  discretion  after  consi- dering  the  rfcorrk  of  all  t>""  pm^lf"'""!  petting  above  Rs.  7S0  DPT month.  Tt  ap- pears  however  that  the  evidenc  of  Shri  S.  N.  Banerjee  on  the  point  ia  more  ac- centabie  nameh'  th^t  tii"  py-srrptin  n"ayr"
 
7  Next  there  is  the  question  of  depreciation  allowable  under  Section  32(11 of  the  Income  Tax  Act,  The  company  claimed  Rs.  36,10,594.  The  assessment order  Ext  B  which  the  company  produced  shows  that  out  of  this  amount  the Income  Tax  Officer  allowed  35,44.830,  and,  withheld  final  order  regarding  thp balance  of  Rs.  65,764  which  was  claimed  as  extra  shift  allowance  on  plant?  and machinery  added  during  the  year,  observing  that  the  ESA  on  addition  should  be calculated  on  the  basis  of  the  number  of  days  used  and  that  in  the  absence  of such  a  statement  the  ESA  on  addition  could  not  be  allowed  but  it  would  be allowed  when  the  requisite  particulars  wert  furnished.  Instead  of  furnishing

SKC. S(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1987/KARTIKA  27,  1880  4351
the  required  particulars  however  the  company  has  preferred  an  appeul  against that  order  of  the  Income  Tax  Ofllcer.  In  the  circumstances  the  unions  have claimed  that  only  the  turn  oi" Rs.  35,44,U30  should  be  taken  to  be  the  depreciation allowable  under  the  Income  Tax  Ai.'L  and  that  Lhe  sum  of  Rs.  65,704  liold  under objection  by  I.T.O.  should  not  be  allowed.  The  I.T.O.  did  not  however  observe that  lhe  amount  was  inadmissible  under  the  Income  Tax  Act,  but  only  asked  for certain  further  particular:;.  According  to  the  opinion  of  the  company's  advisers the  amount  is  admissible  and  the  Income  Tax  Officer  made  a  wrong  order  in asking  for  further  particulars.  In  the  circumstances,  I  think  that  the  objected ;jmouni  should  be  allowed  for  the  purpose  of  computation  of  the  allowable  surplus under  rhc  payment  of  Bonus  Act.
ft. The  unions  have  objected  that  the  interest-,  on  debentures  and  fixed  loans, cominp  to  Rs.  10,89,375  which  is  shown  in  the  Profit  and  Loss  Account  at  page 18  of  the  Annual  accounts,  Ext.  A,  is  a  capital  expenditure  and  should  therefore, be  added  back  in  computing  the  gross  profit  under  clause  3(d)  of  the  Second Schedule.  According  to  the  evidence  of  Shri  R.  N.  Gupta,  the  Accountant,  the fixed  loans  were  taken  in  1964 for  expansion  of  business,  particularly  for  op<_n'ng a  factory  for  large  scale  manufacture  of  PVC  insulation  material,  and  the debentures  were  issued  many  years  back  to  provide  working  capital  and  also  for expanding  the  business.  A  debenture  issued  or  loan  taken  for  creating  working capital  is  not  a  capital  expenditure  but  revenue  expenditure.  The  debenture issued  or  loan  taken  for  expansion  of  business  is  capital  expenditure,  but  interest paid,  on  such  loans  is  a  revenue  expenditure.  It  is  admissible  as  a  deduction  in computing  the  annual  taxable  income  under  Section  36(1) (iii)  of  the  Income  Tax Act.  It  was  held  by  the  Bombay  High  Court  in  AIR  1959,  Bombay,  15(5  (Calico Dyeing  and  Printing  Works  V.  Commissioner  of  Income  Tax,  Bombay)  that,  no distinction  could  be  made  between  money  borrowed  for  the  acquisition  of  capital asset  and  money  borrowed  for  the  acquisition  of  revenue  asset  so  far  as  the  pay- meni  of  interest  is  concerned  and  that  in  both  cases  the  assessee  is  entitled  to claim  deduction  for  Lhe  interest  paid  in  respect  of  computation  of  his  assessable income.  If  he  is  so  entitled  it  follows  that  interest  is  a  revenue  expenditure, bccRUS?,  because  capital  expenditure  cannot  be  deducted  in  computing  the  annual assessable  income.  Accordingly,  the  claim  made  by  the  unions  that  this  sum should  be  added  back  to  ascertain  gross  profit  must  fail.
 
9.  Next,  there  is  a  question  whether  return  on  provision  for  doubtful  debts should  be  allowed  to  the  company  as  charged  in  the  computation  of  allocable surplus.  Under  the  third  schedule  of  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act,  the  company in  making  computation  of  the  allocable  surplus  may  deduct  dividend  on  the  paid up  share  capital  at  85  per  cent  and  return  at  6 per  cent  on  the  reserves  shows  in its  balancesheet  at  the  commencement  of  the  accounting  year,  including  any profit  carried  forwarded  from  the  previous  accounting  year.  Dividend  on  the paid  up  capital  of  Rs,  2,48,65,450  at  8'5  per  cent  comes  to  Rs.  21,13,5(33,  and  return af,  6 per  cent  in  the  reserves  at  the  commencement  of  the  accounting  year  1965-68 as  shown  in  the  balance  sheet,  namely  Rs.  4,68,13,739  comes  to  Rs.  28.08,824.  But lhe  company  has  claimed  further  a  return  at  6  per  cent  on  Rs.  2,50,000  which  is the  provision  for  doubtful  debt,  the  claim  under  that  head  being  Rs.  15.0OO.  On behalf  of  the  unions  it  has  been  urged  that  a  provision  for  doubtful  debt  is  not  a reserve.  Schedule  8  Part  III  of  the  Company's  Act  defines  the  expressions  'Pro- vision1  and  'Reserve',  The  expression  'Provision'  means  any  amount  written  off or  retained  by  way  of  providing  for  depreciation,  renewals  or  diminution  in  value of  assets  or  retained  by  way  of  providing  for  any  known  liability  of  which  the amount  cannot  be  determined  with  substantial  accuracy;  and  the  expression •Reserve'  shall  not  include  any  amount  written  of  or  retained  by  way  of  pro- viding  for  depreciation,  renewals  or  diminution  in  value  of  assets  or  retained by  way  of  providing  any  known  liability.  It  is  provided  by  sab-clause  (2)  of this  interoretation  clause  that  when  the  amount  retained  as  a  provision,  for  a known  liability  is  in  excess  of  the  amount  reasonably  necessary  for  the  purpose, the  excess  shall  be  treated  as  a  reserve  and  not  as  a  provision,  Trr  the  present case  in  the  annual  accounts,  in  stating  the  assets  and  liabilities,  tfte  reserves  at the  beginning  of  1966  or  the  end  of  1&65,  are  shown  as  Rs.  4,68,13,739" at  page  14. The  sum  of  Rs.  2,50,000  as  provision  for  doubtful  debts  does  not  appear  at  page 14  at  all  in  the  statement  of  assets  or  at  page  17  under  the  heading  9—"Reserves pnd  surohis"  where  the  d^ails  of  the  reserves  are  shawm.  This  provision  for doubtful  debt  i3  shown  under  heading  'Debtors,  unsecured'  a*  pege  18  of  Ext.  A. There  is  a  list  given  of  debts  considered  good  and  considered  doubtful  and;  the total  has  been  diminished  by  the  provision  for  doubtful  debts  which  \&  Bs.  150,000 It  it> only  the  diminished  figure  of  Rs.  2.77,55,164  for  debts  which, apoeflrs  at  ptoge 14  in  the  statement  of  assets  and  liabilities.  It  is  clear  therefore  that  this  pro- viflkm  for  doubtful  debts  is- not  a  reserve,  and  the  company  Is  not  entitled  to  a

4353  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PART  I I-
return  at  6 per  cent  on  this  amount.  Accordingly,  on  this  point  the  claim  of  tha unions  is  upheld.
10.  Next,  there  is> the  question  whether  in  computing  the  direct  taxes,  deduc- tion  of  the  amount  payable  as  bonus  should  be  allowed  before  computing  the taxes.  Bonus  paid  is  allowable  as  a  deduction  for  computing  the  taxable  income under  Sec.  36(1)(ii)  of  the  Income  Tax  Act.  Under  the  Payment  of  Bonua  Act, the  direct  taxes  actually  payable  by  the  company  for  the  financial  year  are  not relevant  and  do  not  enter  in  the  computation  of  the  available  surplus.  Notional direct  taxes  on  the  gross  profit  as  worked  out  according  Schedule  II  have  to  be calculated  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Sections  6  and  7  of  the  Payment of  Bonus  Act.  Section  6  clause  (c)  provides  that  subject  to  the  provisions  of Section  7,  any  direct  tax  which  the  employer  is  liable  to  pay  for  the  accounting year  in  respect  of  his  income  profits  and  gains  during  that  year  are  to  be deducted  from  gross  profit  as  a  prior  charge  Sec.  7  provides  that  the  direct  tax shall  be  calculated  at  the  rates  applicable  to  the  income  of  the  employer",  for that  year,  but  no  account  shall  be  taken  of  any  loss  incurred  by  the  employer in  respect  of  any  previous  accounting  year  or  any  arrears  of  depreciation  which the  employer  is  entitled  to  add  to  the  amount  of  depreciation  for  any  following accounting  year;  no  account  is  also  to  be  taken  of  any  tax  rebate  allowable  under Sec.  84  for  any  newly  established  undertaking  or  on  profits  derived  from  the export  of  goods  or  merchandise  out  of  India,  or  of  any  other  rebate  or  credit or  relief  or  deduction  for  the  development  of  any  industry.  It  may  be  noticed that  Section  7  does  not  prohibit  taking  into  account  the  bonus  for  which  under Sec,  36  deduction  from  the  income  is  allowable  under  the  Income  Tax  Act.  Shri J.  N.  Chatterjee  appearing  for  the  management  has  referred  to  Chapter  12  para- graph  1  of  the  Bonus  Commission  report,  when  it  is  recommended  that  the savings  in  tax  on  the  bonus  payable  be  left  with  the  company  which  woaid  get 40  per  cent  of  the  available  surplus  as  against  60  per  cent  payable  to  the  work- men  as  bonus  and  Shri  Chatterjee  has  urged  that  it  should  be  presumed  that intention  of  the  legislature  was  to  follow  the  Bonus  Commission  report;  and that  even  though  there  is  no  Exclusion  of  bonus  payable  in  Sec.  7,  it  should be  understood  that  bonus  payable  is  not  to  be  deducted  in  computing  direct taxes.  On  many  points  however,  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act  has  departed  from the  recommendations  of  the  Bonus  Commission.  Thus,  the  Bonus  Commission recommended  that  the  return  on  paid  up  capital  be  7  per  cent  and  on  reserves, 4  per  cent,  but  the  Act  provides  for  return  at  8'5  per  cent  on  paid  up  capital and  at  6  per  cent  on  reserves.  Further,  the  Bonus  Commission  recommended that  no  account  should  be  taken  of  the  development  rebate  allowed  under  the Income  Tax  Act,  but  Sec.  6(b)  has  permitted  the  deduction  of  the  development rebate  which  usually  is  a  considerable  sum,  being  Rs.  6,76,224  for  the  account- ing  year  1965-66  of  the  I.C.C.,  wide  the  assessment  order,  Ext.  B.  Sections  6  and 7  lay  down  what  items  are  to  be  taken  into  consideration  and  what  items  ore to  be  ignored  in  calculating  the  notional  direct  tax  for  the  purpose  of  computa- tion  of  the  available  surplus  and  subject  to  these,  the  relevant  Taxing  Acts  are to  be  followed.  It  must  be  held  therefore  that  in  calculating  the  notional  direct tax,  deduction  on  account  of  the  Bonus  payable  should  be  made.  Shri  J.  N. Chatterjee  has  also  referred  to  a  decision  of  an  Industrial  Tribunal,  Bombay  in Reference  case  No.  IT  144  of  1966t  Hindustan  Lever  Limited  v.  workmen.  In that  reference  case  the  learned  tribunal  Judge  disallowed  by  the  claim  by  the union  that  in  computing  the  direct  tax  the  bonus  payable  should  be  deducted. The  learned  Judge  pointed  out  that  the  bonus  and  the  allocable  surplus  have to  be  arrived  by  the  method  of  calculation  provided  by  the  Payment  of  Bonus Act,  and  there  is  no  mention  under  the  Act  that  income  tax  has  to  be  deducted on  the  bonus  found  payable;  and  that  such  deduction  would  involve  one  calcula- tion  according  to  the  Act  for  ascertaining  the  bonus  and  another  calculation after  deducting  the  Income  Tax.  This  decision  of  the  Bombay  Tribunal  is however  under  appeal  before  the  Supreme  Court;  so  is  a  contrary  decision  made by  me  in  NIT-1  of  1966,  Indian  Oxygen  Co,  and  its  workmen.  The  point  there- fore  is  at large until  the  Supreme  Court  has  decided  the  matter  one  way  or  the other. My  reading  of  Sec;  6  and  7  leads  me  to  the  inference  that  bonus  payable  has to-be  deducted  from  the  grQ_ss  profit  for  calculation  of  the  direct  tax  or  alterna- tively  rebate  for  the  bonus  found  payable  has  to  be  calculated  and  60  per  cent of  the  rebate  added  back  as  allocable  surplus.  It  should  be  mentioned  that  the Income  Tax  authority  did  not  object  to  deduction  of  the  provision  for  bonus, 15  lakhs,  tor  the  accounting  year  1965-66.for  calculation  of  the  taxable  income. Fcfr  any  extra  amount  found  payable  as  bonus  adjustment  would  follow  in  a future  year;  "  '  " '
11  The  next  point  urged  by  the  unions  is  that  there  must  have  been  a  surplus after  distribution  of  bonus  at  20  t>er  cent  for  the  accounting  year  1964-65  and that  amount  of  surplus  or  set  on  should  be  taken  into  consideration  in  computing ,.

SYC  3(li)l  THE GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  4353
the  bonus  for  U11? accounting  year  1065-66.  But  the  company  in  its  written statement  asserted  Lhat  there  was no  set  on  or  surplus  left  in  the  accounting year  1964-65.  Stiri  R.  N.  Gupta,  witness  for  the  management  stated  that  the company  having  declared  bonus  at  20 per  cent  for  the accounting  year  1964-65 found  that  there  was a  .shortfall  and had to  pay more  than  60 per cent  of the available  surplus  as  bonus  to  honour  its  declaration  and  thus  there  was "• surplus  or  set  on.  This  evidence  must  be  accepted  as  there  is  no  evidence  to the  contrary  and no circumstance  indicating  that  the  evidence  is not  acceptable.
12,  The next  point  urged  by  Shri  Ram Sen on  behalf  of  some  of  the  unions is  that  the considerable  expenditure  shown  by the company  for the heavy  repairs and  renewals  must  include  some  renewals  which  are  of  a  capital  nature  and that  as the company  did not furnish  particulars  of  such  renewals  in  spite  of the interrogatories  the tribunal  must  presume  that  a  certain  percentage  of  the ex- penditure  on repairs  and renewals  was of  capital  expenditure.  In  this  connection Shri  Sen has relied  on a  decision  of  the  Supreme  Court,  1964 I  LXJ 370, Burn and  Co. Limited  and their  workmen.  The controversy  was raised  by the work- " men  that  certain  items  of  expenses,  e.&., repairs  to  buildings  and machinery did not  entirely  represent  revenue  expenditure,  and as the company  did not produce any  evidence  except  the  audited  balancesheet  and Profit  and  Loss  Account,  the industrial  added  back  2} per cent  of the item  as representing  capital  expenditure. The  Supreme  Court  held  that  in  the  circumstances  the order  of  the  industrial tribunal  could  not be  held  to  be  unjustified,  as the  industrial  tribunal  was  not bound  to  accept,  as  correct  whatever  had  been  found  to  be  correct  by the auditors  of  the company.  This  decision  was before  the Payment  of  Bonus Act, 1965.  Under  Sec, 23 of  the  Payment  of  Bonus  Act there  is  a  presumption  of correctness  of  the  audited  accounts  and balancesheet  of  the  company  and it is for  the party  challenging  the same  to prove  that  they  are wrong.  In the present case  the  unions  did not  furnish  any evidence  to  show  that  any portion  of the expenditure  shown  under  the  repairs  and  renewals  was  of  a  capital  nature. According  to  the reply  to  the  interrogatories,  Ext. H,  and the evidence  of  Shri R.  N. Gupta  the entire  amount  shown  under  the head  renewals  and repairs was spent  on  repairs  and no  part  was of  a  capital  nature.  Accordingly,  the  claim that  a  percentage  on the expenditure  on  repairs  and renewals  should  be  added "back  as  capital  expenditure  for  computing  the gross  profit  must  be  rejected.
13.  No other  point  has beerj  urged  before  me,  The following  computation  of the  gross  profits  and the  allocable  surplus  has  been  made  in  accordance  with the  decision  stated  above •—
COMPUTATION  OF GROSS  PROJTTS
Ra.
Rs.
I. Net  profit  as per profit  iind  loss account  -  . ..
79>47.-378
Add  back  provision  for :
a..
(a) Bonus to employees  . . . . . ..
15,00,000
(b) Depreciation
. . . . . ..
36,04,275
(c) Direct  taxes  •  •  •  •
81,50,000
(d) Development  Rebate  Reserve  .  *.
Included in Net  profit
(e) Any  other  reserves  . . . . ..
1,32,54.275
Add  back  also :
3.
(a) Bonus paid 10 employees in respect of previous accounting
year
1,25,181
(b)  Ex-gratia  payment,  being  bonuR  paid  ouLside  the  provisions
of the Act, in respect of previous  accounting  year
2,65,000
(c)  Donations in excess  of the  amount  admissible  for income
tax.
8,100
(d)  Any  annuity due  or paid  • . - . ..
(")  Capital  expenditure  and capital  losses
9,629
(f)  Expenditure  relating  to business  at Karachi  (out side  India)
6,632 4.i4'542
T O T AL  GROSS  PROFIT
2,16,16,1^

4354  T H1  GAZETTE  OK INDIA:  NOVEMWlll  18, I9G7/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PARI  U-
Deduct—
Rs.
3 6 , l o , -^
(i)  Depreciation admissible UIIJL/  S. 32(TJ  of Income Tax Act
(2) Dev.  Rebau  admissible under  S. 32(0 of Income Tax Act
6,71s 224
42,K6.'is 1,73  21.377
COMPUTATION OF DIRECT TAXES
Income Tax on i, 73, 29,377 less 21,06,576—1,52,22,801  at 55%
X,, 72,541
Dividend Tax at 7 1/2% on excess over 10% p:iid as dividend (Dividi rd
ai  25 per cent  paid  on paid  up capital  of 2-48,65.450—62,16-362 5c
2  7Q  73*
TOTAL  DIRECT  TAX (NO Surtax  payable i
8n  J2.277
COMPUTATION  OF ALLOCABLE  SURPLUS
GrOiis  Profit  •
i,73  :9.577
Direci  taxes
. . . . . ..
H6  ^2,277
86  77,TOO
D i v i d md  on  Paid  up  Capital  2,  48, 65,450  at  8 1/2%
21,13,5"3
R e t u rn  on  Reserve  of 4,  68, 13, 739 at 6%
28,08,824 49,22,387
37,54,713
Available  Surplus
37'54.7T3 A l l o c a b le  s u r p l us  ( 6 0 %)  . . . . . ..
22 52,82s
Bo  r us  (u> 2 0%
. . . . . ..
21,06,576
S et  on
. . . . ..
1,4-6,352
22.52.82R
According to the ciMnputation, I find that 20 per cent of the gross effective  salark;,  and Wagct (1)05, 32j 880), is payable for the accounting  year  1965-66 as bonus, leaving  a surplus or sel on of Rs.  1,46,252.
14.  My award,  therefore, is that  the quantum  of bonus payable to the workmen of the Indian Cable  Company  Limited,  Calcutta, for the accounting  year  1965-66 is 20 per cent of the  effective salaries or Wages and the balance  of 6.49  per cent  should, therefore, be paid  to the  workmen in due course i.e. within 3 month s of publication  of the award, leaving-" surplus or set  on  of  Ks.  1 1,46,152.
(Sd.>'-  S.  K, SEX,
Presiding  Officer.
Dated  Calcutta, the
a<*h  October,  1967.
[No.  17-1-67—LRIIIJ

SET-  3(li)l  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA  :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4355
New  QeUn,  the  Eth  November  1067
7  •,t h^  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the t
REI-'ERKNCF.  NO-  121  OF  1966
PARTIES :
ANT)
PRESENT  :
APPEARANCES
I,
2, 3. 4- 5. 6. 7, 8. 9. 1 0. 1 1.
1 2. 13. 14. 15.
 
2.  According  to  the  written  statement  ot  the  union,  Keonihar  Mmcs  and Forest  Workers  Union,  there  had  been  constant  disputes  between  the  manage- ment  and  the  workmen  of  Bhadrasai  Managanese  mine  for  some  years,  and  there was  a  strike  by  the  workmen  which  lasted  from  11th  March,  1968  to  6in*™][< 1885,  the  strike  being  withdrawn  after  the  management  and  the  union  agreed

.4356  mt  (JA/EME  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1%7/KARTIKA 'XI, 18S9  [PART  I I-
before  the  Conciliation  Officer  for  reference  of  the  dispute  relating  to  the  strike to  adjudication.  A  reference  to  adjudication  was  accordingly  made,  and  when the  reference  case  was  still  pending,  the  management  discharged  the  15  workmen Jisted  in  the  reference  order  for  alleged  unfitness  for  further  work  on  the  basis ol  reports  by  the  company's  medical  Officer,  Dr.  E.  Das.  According  to  the  union the  discharge  when  the  reference  case  was  pending,  without,  obtaining  appioval of  the  tribunal  was  in  contravention  of  Section  33  of  the  Industrial  .Disputes  Act and  further,  according  to  union,  the  declaration  of  unfitness  by  the  company's medical  officer  was  mala  fide  and  the  company  really  wanted  to  get  rid  of  the workmen  who  were  active  workers  of  the  union.  Accordingly  the  union  wanted reinstatement  of  the  15  workers  with  full  wages  for  the  period  of  non-employ- ment
3.  According  to  the  written  statement  of  the  management,  there  was  no  dis- missal  or  discharge  in  connection  with  any  misconduct  and  so  the  management was(not  required  to  obtain  approval  of  the  tribunal  before  which  a  case  between the  management  and  the  workmen  concerning  Bhadrasai  Manganese  mine  was pending  and  therefore  there  was  no  contravention  of  Section  33  of  the  Industrial Disputes  Act.  The  management  denied  that  the  15  workers  had  been  victimised •because  of  their  trade  union  activities  or  because  their  participation  in  the  strike which  lasted  from  11th  March,  1965  to  6th  May,  19G5.  According  to  the  manage- ment,  under  clause  32  sub-clause  (a)  of  the  Standing  orders  of  the  company,  all employees  are  to  undergo  medical  examination  once  every  two  years,  and  if found  unfit  they  are  liable  to  be  discharged;  apart  from  that,  any  employe-^  may be  required  at  any  time  to  undergo  medical  examination  and  if  found  to  be unfit  he  is  liable  to  be  discharged.  In  accordance  with  that  rule  about  100 workers,  according  to  the  management,  were  sent  to  the  company's  medical officer  between  July  and  September,  1965  for  examination  as  to  their  fitness  for further  work;  27  of  the  workmen  were  reported  to  be  unfit  and  the  remaining workmen  reported  fit  by  the  medical  officer,  and  all  the  27  workers  found  unfit by  the  medical  officer  were  served  with  notices  of  discharge  and  asked  to  take their  final  payments;  12  of  the  workers  accepted  their  final  payments  und  did  not raise  any  dispute.  In  respect  of  other  15  workers  with  whom  we  are  concerned in  the  reference  order,  the  management  denied  that  the  declaration  of  the medical  officer  as  to  their  unfitness  was  mala  flde  or  done  at  the  instance  of  the management  which  wanted  to  get  rid  of  the  workers.
4.  The  management  produced  certified  Standing  orders  of  the  Orissa  Minerals Development  Company  Limited  which  owns  several  mines  including  the Bhadrasai  Manganese  mine.  Clause  32(a)  of  the  Standing  orders  provides  for periodical  medical  examination  of  the  employees  and  empowers  the  management to  discharge  those  who  are  found  unfit  on  medical  examination.  Sub-clause  (b) of  clause  32  provides  that  the  company  will  recognise  only  medical  certificates granted  by  its  own  medical  officers  or  by  a  Civil  Surgeon  or  by  a  doctor  employ- ed  by  Messrs  Bird  and  Co.  or  Messrs  Heilgers  and  Company.  The  management gave  evidence  to  prove  that  in  accordance  with  that  clause  32(a)  the  management has  been  sending: workers  for  medical  examination  as  to  fitness  from  time  to  time. From  the  evidence  of  MW  2-Shri  S.  Dayal,  Senior  Personnel  Officer  of  the •Orissa  Minerals  Development  Co.,  it  appears  that  on  the  ground  of  unfitness  for further  work  on  the  basis  of  medical  evidence,  the  management  discharged  23 workers  in  March  1961  vide  the  discharge  letters  Ext.  C  to  C22:  14  workers  in June  1961  vide  the  discharge  letters  Ext.  B  to  B13  and  11  workers  in  June  1962 vide  the  discharge  letters  Ext.  D  to  D10.  Shri  H,  Behra,  General  Secretary  of the  union,  who  deposed  as  PW  1  stated  that  he  was  not  aware  of  any  other occasion  on  which  workers  had  been  sent  by  the  management  for  medical  ex- amination  or  discharged  for  unfitness  on  the  basis  of  the  report  of  medical  officer but  the  evidence  of  Shri  B.  Dayal  together  with  the  exhibits  referred  to  above shows  that  Shri  Behra  was  not  aware  of  the  correct  position  and  that  the  com- pany  has  been  sending  workers  for  medical  check  UD from  time  to  timo  and discharging  the  workmen  who  are  reported  unfit  by  the  medical  officer.
 
5.  In  order  to  show  that  the  present  set  of  orders  of  discharge  against  the 15  workers  concerned  in  the  case  was  mala  fide  and  amounted  to  victimisation Shri  Behra  in  his  evidence  referred  to  the  strike  which  had  taken  place  ut  the mine  from  11th  March,  1965  to  6th  May,  1965  and  said  that  the  15  workers  were discharged  during  August  and  September.  1065  i.e.,  three  to  four  months  after the  strike  had  ended  by  the  agreement  to  refer  the  dismite  leading  to  the  strike to  a  tribunal.  Shri  Behra  also  mentioned  that  all  the  15  workers  were  members of  the  Keonjhar  Mines  and  Forest  Workers  Union  and  that  the  company  did  not recognise  that  union  which  is  affiliated  to  the  AITUC  but  recognised  the  rival union,  the  Barbil  Workers  Union  which  is  affiliated  to  the  INTUC.  But  Shri Behra  went  on  to  state  that  00  to  100  workers  who  were  sent  for  medical

Src.  3(ii)]  THE  GA/EI  TE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27,  13"9  4357
examination  during  August  and  September  1965  were  all  members  of  his  union and  that  they  all  participated  in  the  strike.  In  the  circumstances  it  is  not possible  to  accept  the  union's  case  that  the  15  workers  concerned  in  the  reference case  were  discharged  because  they  participated  in  the  strike,  lor  only  27  out  of 90  or  100  workers  were  reported  to  be  unfit  by  the  medical  officer  of  the  com- pany  and  only  those  27  workers  were  discharged.  Further,  12  of  the  27  workers accepted  the  final  payments  and  went  away  without  raising  anv  complaint  or even  seeing  the  General  Secretary,  Shri  Behra.  Shri  Behra  admitted  in  cross examination  that  regarding  these  12 workers,  as  they  did  not  meet  him  but  went away  on  taking  their  final  payments,  he  did  not  consider  it  necessary  to  look  into their  esses.  Shri  Behra  further  admitted  that  husbands  and  wives  of  the  15 workers  concerned  in  the  reference  where  they  were  in  the  service  of  the  com- pany  have  not  been  discharged.  Two  of  the  workers  who  deposed  before  the tribunal  said  that  their  wives  are  still  working,  namely  PW  2-Makru  Munda {No.  53  cf  the  reference  order)  and  PW  7-Lebia  Munda  (No.  2  of  the  reference order)  There  being  evidence  that  all  the  workers  had  joined  the  strike  it follows  that  the  wives  and  husbands  of  the  discharged  workers  had  also  joined the  strike.  The  company  however  did  not  take  steps  to  discharge  the  wives and  husbands  of  these  workers  on  the  ground  of  their  unio  •  — ": -  ' • participation  in  the  strike.  This  goes  to  support  the  contents ment  that  there  was  no  victimisation  because  of  trade  union cipation  in  the  strike.  On  behalf  of  the  management  Dr.  B.  K.  Das  who  was  at the  relevant  time  the  medical  officer  in  the  service  of  the  company  and  in'charge of  Roida  dispensary  and  who  examined  90  or  100  workers  in  batches  as  to  their continued  physical  fitness  for  further  work,  has  deposed  before  the  tribunal  as -MW  1.  The  reports  submitted  by  Dr.  Das  are  Ext.  A  dated  20th  July,  1965  to A8>  dated  7th  August,  1965.  The  reports  specify  in  respect  of  each  individual worker  the  apparent  age.  the  condition  of  the  hearts,  lungs  and  eyes,  the  blood pressure  and  the  condition  of  general  health,  with  the  doctor's  remark  as  to- fitness  cr  unfitness  for  further  work.  The  reports  support  the  case  of  the  com- pany  as  well  as  the  evidence  of  Dr.  Das  himself  that" out  of  nearly  100  workers examined  by  him  only  27  or  28  were  found  unfit  and  the  remaining  workers examined  were  found  fit  for  further  work.  There  appears  to  be  a  t'me  lag between  the  date  when  the  reports  were  submitted  to  the  Superintendent  of  the Bhadrasai  Mine  and  the  dates  of  discharge  as  noted  in  the  reference  order.  But this  is  explained  by  the  fact  that  there  was  some  difficulty  in  serving  the  dis- charge  notice.  The  Senior  Personnel  Officer,  Sri  Dayal,  has  stated  that  the notices  of  discharge  when  tendered  by  hand  through  Peon  book  were  refused by  the  worker  concerned,  and  when  they  were  sent  by  registered  post  the . covers  were  refused  and  came  back  unserved,  and  ultimately  in  each  case  the management  had  to  put  up  the  notice  in  the  Notice  Board  as  to  the  discharge or  termination  of  service.  Thus  in  the  case  of  Jogmohan  Lohar,  No.  1  in  the
reference  order,  the  medical  report,  Ext,  A,  ---  "•• •  '  '•  '  -ae  other workers  dated  7th  August.  1965  was  forwardei  •  on  12th August,  1985;  the  notice  of  discharge,  Ext.  E  dated  13th  August.  1965.  could  not be  served  bv  hand  and  Ext.  Fi  is  the  registered  cover  containing  the  -notice  of discharge  addressed  to  Jogmohan  at  his  quarters  at  B  Hutting  which  was refused  on  23rd  August.  1965,  as  the  endorsement  of  ihe  postman  shows and  which  was  thereafter  returned  to  the  management.  Thereafter  the  notice of  discharge  was  put  vp  on  the  Notice  Board  and  the  discharge  took  effect  from 1st  of  September,  1965.
6.  Thus  the  Company  has  sought  to  show  in  each  case  th.at  it  acted  on  the opinion  of  its  medical  officer  and  in  accordance  with  clause  32(a)  of  the  Stand- ing  orders.  The  General  Secretary  of  the  Union  after  raising  disputes  before the  Conciliation  Officer  took  all  thfi  15  workers  for  medical  examination  -to  Dr. B.  B.  Roy  who  was  then  inchargp  as  Assistant  Surgeon  of  the  Government hospital  at  Barbil.  Dr.  Rov  after  examination  of  these  workers  gave  certificates in  general  terms  stating  that  he  could  not  discover  that  the  worker  concerned had  any  disease,  weakness  or  bodily  infirmity  and  that  the  worker  was  fit  for duty.  Thesp  certificates  are  Exts.  1  to  l(n),  13  of  them  are  dated 23-d  September  1965  and  2  of  them  namely  Ext.  1 (i)  relating  to  Jogmohan  Lohar and  Ext.  l(j)  --elating  to  Narendra  Patra  are  dated  25th  September  1965  Accord- in?  t~>  the  evidence  of  Dr.  Roy,  13  of  the  workers  were  produced  bv  Shri  Behra for  examination  on  23rd  September  1965 and  the  remaining  two  on25th  September UW5  O".  23rd  Sentf?~iV.eT-  1065  they  were  taken  to  the  Barbil  hospital  at  about 10  or  11 A.M.  According  to  Dr.  Roy  he  was  on  hospital  duty  from  7  A.M.  to  11  A.M. and  after  11  A.M. he  examined  the  13  workers  who  were  Droduced  by  Shri  Behra for  examination  and  it  took  him  2 to  3 hours  to  examine  them-  He  examined  them as  a  private  medical  practitioner,  being  permitted  private  practice.  He  stated  that he  examined  their  hearts  and  lungs  with  Stethoscope  and  also  felt  their  spleens and  livers,  but  did  not  take  their  blood  pressure  or  do  any  clinical  examination..

4358  **J£  GA/JiITE  O* INDIA.  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1880  [P\Rr  I I-
According  to D1:. Koy he did not make  any note  as  to  the pulse  late  or  blood pressure  or any Other  detail  as he found  no ailment  or bodily  infirmity,  and so he gave  the  certificates  in  the  terras  already  mentioned;  he  himself  took  the  thumb impression  oi  each  worker  who.n  he  examined  on  the  relevant  certificate.  Shri Beara  has relied  on these  certificates  in  support  of his case  that  the orders  cf dis- charge  were  malo-fide and aruourted  to victimisation.  It  must  be pointed  out  ho\r- ever  that  the  examination  of Ihese  workers  by Dr.  Roy was  only  a  superficial general  examination  in  order  to  ascertain  v.'het.ier  they  were  suffering  from  any ailment.  Dr. Roy further  admitted  that  he was not acquainted  with  the conditions of  work  in a manganese  'nine;  and therefore  he was not in a position  to say  whe- ther  the workers  who were  examined  by him were  fit for  work  in the manganese mine-  Reports  ci  Dr. Dae, the  company's  doctor,  give  particulais  and  generally show  the reasocs  why he considered  certain  workers  examined  by him as unfit  for further  work.  Moreover,  Dr- Das had been  working  for many  years  under  Messrs Bird  & Co. and had experience  of  manganese  mine  workers  and  iron  ere mine workers,  and knew  .;he conditions  of  work  iti such  mines.  In  any ease,  after con- sidering  the  reports  submitted  by Dr. Das it cainol  be  scid  that  his opinion was milafide  or dic.cit-.c  by the management,  as  suggested  in the written  statement of the  union.
7.  Shri  Ali Amjad  appearing  on  behalf  of  the union  has urgad  that  it is not jproper  that  the opinion  of the company's  docto"  as to  continued  fitness  for  work of  any particular  worker  should  be final  and that  the worker  concerned  shou.d not hav*  any right  io  aupeal  from  t.-ie opinion  of  the company's  doctor  to  another authority  I h rl  Basu  Thakur  has urged  on  behalf  of  the management  that the company'could  not recognise  any certificate  granted  by an  Assistant  Surgeon, but if  the workmen  had prodaced  certificate  of  fitness  from  a Civil  Surgeon,  tlje com- pany  might  take  notice  of  such  certificates  ui:dei  sui>clause  (b) of  clause  22 -i  the Standing  orders,  -.ad pos'ublv  reconsider  the  question  of  re-e.-nployme.it-  ci any workman  examined  and found fll by the Civil  Surgeon.  Sim Basu  Thatur  h3f  also urged  that  the managemeit  acted  in  good  ;uth on the opinion  of  teen  ' i . ^ c al officer  and that  the tribunal  should  not from  the  appearance  oi  My  par.jcular workc-  come  to the conclusion  that  the ord£-r  of  discharge  on mecucal  grounds by fee  managTment  was unjustified.  It is hov-sver  for ihe tribunal to decide  whether the  action  of fhe management  was justified  on tba materials  before  it
8.  Shri  Basu  Thakur  r.as also  urgsd  that it is  fitness  or  unfltn?ss  ai;  ^ . ^ r tt cular  time  when  managemen:  nclsd  that  is relevant,  and that  -J by lest  id  - J S k i h w r as  imPTOV.-mt-nt  :-i the health  of  any particular  workman,  so  that nl  m kt  bl  considered  at  after'  such  rest,  that  fact  is  irrelevant  m  ronariermg
appears  to support  the argument  of Shri  Basu  Thakur.
;s-Hr3I"Sitf-33Smmmmmsm support  o7their  claim  of fitness must  be  individually examined-
 
• 1.  A. " . r d,  N.. 2-Lebi.  MunU, (not Lehi, M ^ - h .,  " ,, m !"  " • *"

MU.  j ( r , ,j  I H r,  c A / J . 1 1 1 ',  O*  I N D IA  :  NOVi.MuJb.K  18,  I y 6 / / K A R1  iivA  It,  18"J  4 3 59
blood  pressure  as  found  by the  doctor  appears  to  have  been  more  or  less  normal. In  view  of the fact  that  she is  to  work  on  surface  where  as Dr. Das found  her unfit  for  work  in the mines,  I  must  hold  that  she was fit for  continued  work  as a dressing  kamin  end therefore  the order  of  discharge  was  unjustified.
13.  As  regards  No. 14—Sm-  Malli  Dei—-the  case  is  similar  to  the  case  of Sni.  Durpati  E- i.  In  her case  also  I  must  find  that  on  the basis  cf  opinion  of Dr.  Das that  uie  was unfit  for  work  in  the  mines  the  management  ought  not to have  discharged  her  because  her  work  was generally  on  the  surface-
14.  As regard?  No. 12—Kabi  Mahakud—Dr.  Das found  that  his heart  was weak and  he bad  narked  anaemia  and general  debility  and his diastolic  blood  pressure was  high  being  100 mm. Hg.  When  he  appeared  before  the tribunal  he  appeared to  be suffering  from  intermittent  tremeurs.  Accordingly,  it  cannot  be said  that the company  was wroag  in  acting  on  the  opinion  of  the  medical  officer  as  to his unfitness-
15.  As regards  No- 13—Sri  Makru  Munda—Dr.  Das found  that  his  pulse was rapid  beh^ ^00 per minute  and the  blood  pressure  low-  As he  is  a  mining maz- door  and has to work  in the mine  it cannot  be said  that  the management  was wrong in  acting  on the opinion  of the doctor  that  he was unfit  to  work  in  the mines.
16.  As  regards  the  allegation  that  the  management  contravened  the  provisions of  Sec 33 of the Industrial  Disputes  Act by not seeking the approval  of the tribunal when  discharging  the  fifteen  workers.  I  must  accept  the  contention  of  the IUanage- ment  that  Sec. 33 has no application  as the discharge  was for  unfitness  or  supposed unfitness  for  further  work,  and not for  any  misconduct-
17.  My award  therefore  is  that  the  termination  of  service  of  three  workers whose  work  was usually  on the surface,  namely  No. 1—Jogmohan  Lohar,  No-  10— Sm.  Durpatl  Dei and No. 14—Sm.  Malli  Dei, on  the  basis  of  the  opinion  of the medical  oSc?r  of  the  company  as to  unfitness  for  work  in  the  mines  was  unjusti- fied; but  in the ct'je  of the remaining  12 workers  the termination  of  service  by the management  on the  basis  of  the  opinion  of  their  medical  officer  was justified.  In the  case  of  the three  workmen,  namely  No-  1—Jogmohan  Lohar,  No.  10—Durpati Dei  and No.  14—Sm-  Malli  Dei, I  direct  that  they  be  reinstated  within  one month of  the  publication  of  the award.  I  do not however  think  that  any pay should  be awarded  for  the pwiod  of  non employment  as  there  is  nothing  to  show  that  the management  acter1  malaiide  or  with  the  intention  of  victimising  the  workers con- cerned.  Acc-.rdir>/4y,  1 direct  that  the period  of  non-employment  should  be  treated as  leave  withaut pay.
Sd./-  S. K.  SEN,
Doted,  the 2Sth  October,  1967
Presiding  Officer. [No.  35/3/66-LRL]
New  Delhi,  the  9th November  1967
S,O.  4092.—In  pursuance  of  section  17 of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act, 1947 (14 of-  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of the Industrial  Tribunal,  Calcutta,  in  the industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in relation  to  the  Paradeep  Port  and  their  workmen  which  was  received  by the Central  Government  on  7th  November, 1967.
CENTRAL.  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL,  CALCUTTA
REFERENCE  NO.  7  OF  1967
PAH TIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Paradeep  Port,  Bhubaneshwar,
AND
Their  workmen.
PRESENT:
Shri  S. K.  Sen—Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES :
On  behalf  of Employers—Shri  M. Misra,  Asstt.  Secretary- On  behalf  of  Workmen—Absent.

- ~,
" "-  '
£,t  t  [*~  "
STATE ;  Orissa
INDUSTRY :  Port.
AWARD
By  Order  No,  28(25)/66-LRIV,  dated  9th  January,  1967,  the  Central  Gov- ernment  referred  for  adjudication  an  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers in  relation  to  the  Paratiee;:;  Port..  Orissa  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the matters  specified  in  the  following  schedule:
"Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  the  Paradeep  Port  is  justified in  retrenching  the  following  workmen  of  the  Water  Supply  and Roads  Division  of  the  port  with  effect  from  the  afternoon  of  the- 31st  December,  1965?  If  not,  to  what  relief  are  the  workmen  entitled?
1.  Shri  S,  S.  Khan—Pump  Driver. 2.  Shri  Duryodhan  Nail—Pump  Driver. 3.  Shri  M.  N,  Sahu—Pump  Driver. 4.  Shri  Bhaskar  Charnan  Patra—Asstt.  Pump  Driver. 5.  Shri  K.  C.  Pradhan—Asstt.  Pump  Driver, 6.  Shri  Dhuruba  Charan—Fitter  Mistry, 7.  Shri  Gopal  Charan  Sahu—Fitter  Mistry. 8.  Shri  Netrananda  Nayak—Fitter  Mistry. 9.  Shri  Damodar  Behera—Fitter  Mistry. 10.  Shri  Khadag  Bahadur—Gurkha  Guard. 11.  Shri  Rama  Bahadur—Gurkha  Guard. 12.  Shri  Dhan  Bahadur  Thappa—-Watchman."
 
2.  Of  the  12 workmen,  9  namely  No.  1 to  5  who  were  Pump  drivers  or  Asstt. Pump  drivers  and  (i  to  fl  who  were  Fitter  mistries  were  employed  under  the Water  Supply  Division  of  Paradeep  Port.  Nos.  10  and  11  were  Gurkha  guards and  12  a  watchman;  guards  and  watchmen  were  employed  rnainly  to  guard  the valuable  materials  which  were  sent  to  the  worksite  from  the  central  stores  at Bhubaneshwar  for  use  in  connection  with  the  execution  of  the  Paradeep  Port project.  According  to  the  management,  work  in  connection  with  the  project started  in  August,  1962,  and  for  supplying  water  to  the  workmen  employed  20O tube  wells  were  sunk.  Workmen  6  to  9  were  fitter  mistries  employed"  to  aitend to  the  tube  wells  and  repair  minor  defects  so  that  the  tube  wells  might  remain In  working  order;  while  Nos.  1  to  5  were  pump  drivers  or  asstt.  pump  drivers who  manually  worked  the  pumps  in  connection  with  the  water  supply,  there 'being  16  pumps  in  use  during  the  initial  stage  of  the  construction  of  the  Pp.ia- deep  Port.  A  permanent  water  supply  scheme  was  also  taken  up  in  connection with  the  execution  of  the  Paradeep  Port  project,  and  the  water  supply  system  for supply  of  pined  water  after  filtering  came  into  operation  from  the  1st  

^  - . . , . , . . *.  L .  .  ,  .  16,  :-  /IL  .  iJiA  zv,  J  436!
issue  of  fresh  notices  for  retrenchment  being  waived  by  the  union.  The  manage- ment  was  willing  to  extend  the  period  of  temporary  employment  of  the  work- men  because  the  permanent  water  supply  scheme  was  not  ready  by  the  middle of  October  or  even  by  middle  of  November,  1965,  as  expected.
By  the  end  of  November.  19GS  it  was  estimated  that  the  permanent  water- supply  scheme  would  be  ready  by  the  end  of  December,  1965.  Accordingly, the  management  decided  to  make  the  retrenchment  effective  from  the  afternoon of  the  31st  December,  1&G5,  and  communicated  its  decision  to  tiic  union  and  to the  appropriate  authorities.  By  the  notices  of  27th  and  28th  October,  1965,  the workmen  were  informed  thai  ihey  would  be  paid  their  duts  and  compensation under  Section  25F  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act  by  the  date  of  their  retrench- ment.  By  31st  December,  1965,  pay  orders  in  respect  of  dues  of  each  of  the  12 workmen  were  drawn  up  and  -several  of  the  workmen  received  their  final  pay- ment  including  compensation  under  Sect.on  25F  oi  Lhe  Act  by  that  date.  Some of  the  workmen  turned  up  later  and  received  compensation  later  and  it  appears from  the  evidence  of  Shri  Misra  that  one  of  the  workmen  namely  No.  7—Uopal Charan  Sahu  has  not  yet  received  his  compensation.
3.  The  union  filed  a  written  statement  alleging  that  the  retrenchment  was illegal  and  mala  fide  and  adopted  as  a  me>asu,e  of  victimisation  and  that  the  rules for  retrenchment  were  not  sirictly  observed;  in  particular  a  seniority  list  was not  published.  The  management  in  its  written  statement  claimed  that  the retrenchment  was  done  strictly  in  accordance  with  the  rules  and  denied  that tnere  was  any  mala  jid<' or  illegality  in  the  retrenchment.  According  to  the management  the  retrenchment  was  inevitable  because  there  was  no  more  work of  the  kind  that  the  workmen  concerned  in  the  reference  had^  been  engaged temporarily  for  doing.
4.  At  the  hearing  the  union  has  not  been  represented.  After  waiting  for sometime  for  the  union's  representative  to  appear  the  case  was  taken  up  ex- parte.  After  the  hearing  had  been  completed  a  communicat;on  was  received from  Shri  Nishamani  Khuntia,  President  of  the  Workers'  Union  asking  for  ad- journment,  At  that  stage  however  the  question  of  adjournment  did  not  arise. Moreover,  it  is  clear  from  the  ex-parte  evidence  before  me  that  the  establishment in  cnnection  with  the  construction  of  the  Paradeep  Port  was  necessarily  a  tempo- rary  establishment;  and  if  it  had  been  completed  within  two  ycai",  then  Section 25F  of  the  Act  would  not  have  had  any  application  in  view  of  Sub-section  (2)  of Section  25F.  It  is  because  the  undertaking  was  not  completed  within  two years  that  Section  25F  applies  at  all.  But  necessarily  the  workmen  who  were employed  for  the  temporary  purpose  of  work  in  connection  with  the  construc- tion  are  liable  to  retrenchment  when  the  work  is  completed.  It  is  clear  that the  undertaking  of  construction  of  the  port  is  not  the  same  as  the  undertaking of  maintaining  the  port  after  it  has  been  constructed.  Necessarily  at  the  cons- truction  stn^e  a  much  larger  number  of  workmen  of  various  categories  is  requir- ed  but  many  of  them  would  not  be  required  at  all  after  the  construction  is  over. In  the  circumstances,  the  ca,se  by  the  union  for  continued  employment  appears to  be  mis-conceived.
 
5.  The  union  was  no  doubt  entitled  to  raise  objection  if  the  management  had not  complied  with  the  provisions  of  Section,  25F  of  the  Act  and  the  Rules  in connection  therewith.  It  appears  that  from  the  beginning  the  union  wus  refer- ring  the  question  of  retrenchment  to  the  A.L.C.,  Central  at  Jharsaguda  and therefore  when  initially  without  formally  publishing  the  seniority  list  of  different categories  of  workers  the  retrenchment  orders  were  issued,  the  A.L.C.,  Central, Jharsaguda  intervened  and  the  management  thereupon  cancelled  the  original retrenchment  notices*,  Exts.  A  to  A3  which  were  issued  on  14th  September,  K65 and  issueed  fresh  notice  Exts.  B  1o  B3  on  27th  October,  19(55  and  28th  October, IflflS,  after  drawing  up  a  seniority  list,  dated  27th  October,  1965  vidr  Ext-  D- The  Executive  Engineer  forwarded  the  seniority  list  to  various  subordinate officers  for  exhibition  in  their  office  Notice  Boards,  and  it  must  be  presumed  that the  seniority  lists  were  so  exhibited.  It  is  therefore  not  correct  that  there  was no  publication  of  the  seniority  list  on  the  Notice  Board  as  required  by  Rule  77 of the  Central  Rules  under  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act.  It  appeared  from  the evidence  of  Sri  Misra  that  several  of  the  12  workmen  were  paid  their  dues  in- cluding  compensation  on  31st  December,  1965.  from  the  afternoon  of  which  date the  retrenchment  became  effective.  As  to  the  remaining  workmen,  they  were also  asked  to  come  and  receive  payment  by  31st  December,  1965  and  it  was  their fault  that  they  did  not  come  and  receive  payment.  It  may  be  pointed  out  that one  of  the  12  workmen,  namely  No,  4  of  the  reference  order  Bhaskar  Chaman Patra,  was  employed  on  1st  March,  1965  and  had  not  completed  12  months' service  before  the  retrenchment  and  therefore  Section  25F  did  not  apply  to  him at  all.  The  date  of  appointment  of  the  remaining  workmen  concerned  in  the

4362  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INBIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART  I I-
reference  order  varies  from  January,  1063  to  October,  1984.  They  completed  one year's  service  before  retrenchment,  blrt  the  provisions  of  Section  25F  of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act  were  duly  observed  in  effecting  their  retrenchment. Shri  Mjsra  has  denied  that  anybody  was  employed  after  these  12  workmen  were discharged,  for  doing  any  of  the  work  that  these  workmen  were  doing.  He stated  that  there  was  no  work  to  be  done  from  1966.  In  the  circumstances  the question  of  their  re-instatement  cannot  arise  at  all,  apart  from  my  finding  that in  effecting  the  retrenchment  the  provisions  of  the  Act  and  the  Rules  were  pro- perly  observed.
6.  My  award  therefore  is  that  the  action  of  the  management  of  the  Paradeep Port  in  retrenching  the  workmen  mentioned  in  the  Reference  Order  with  effect Irom  the  afternoon  of  31st  December,  1965,  was  justified  and  the  workmen  con- cerned  are  not  entitled  to  any  relief
(Sd.)  S-  K.  SEN,
Presiding  Officer, [No.  28/25/66-LRIV.]
ORDERS
New  Delhi,  the  1th  November  1967
,S.O.  4093.—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-section  (Al)  of  section 10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1H47  (14  of  1947).  the  Central  Government  here- by  makes  the  following  amendment  in  the  Order  of  the  Government  of  India  in the  Ministry  of  Labour,  Employment  and  Rehabilitation  (Department  of  Labour and  Employment)  No.  S.O.  2639,  dated  the  27th  July,  1967: —
In  the  Schedule  annexed  to  the  Order,  after  the  word  "Bombay"  the  wordr "and  of  all  its  branches"  shall  be  added.
[No.  17/5/87-LRI1L]
New  Delhi,  the  10t7i  November  1967
S.O.  4094.—Whereas  an  industrial  dispute  between  the  Reserve  Bank  of  India and  its  workmen  was  referred  for  adjudication  to  the  National  Industrial  Tribunal (Bank  Disputes),  Bombay  and  its  award  was  published  in  Part  II,  Section  3  Sub- section  (ii)  of  the  Gazette  of  India  Extraordinary  dated  the  29th  September, 1962  with  the  Notification  of  the  Government  Of  India  in  the  Ministry  of  Labour and  Employment  No.  S.O.  3031, dated  the  22nd  September,  1962.
And  whereas  in  the  opinion  of  the  Central  Government  difficulties  have  arisen as  to  the  interpretation  of  the  said  award  in  respect  of  the  question  specified  in  the Schedule  hereto  annexed;
Now  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  36A  of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14  of  l E ^ ),  the  Cejitral  Government  hereby refers  the  said  question  for  decision  to  the  Industrial  Tribunal,  Calcutta  consti- tuted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Act.
"SCHEDULE
Whether  any  representative  of  a  registered  trade  union  of  the  Reserve  Bank Employees,  even  if  he  is  not  in  the  employment  of  the  Reserve  Bank,  is  entitled to  defend  a  workman  of  the  Bank  against  when  disciplinary  proceedings  are instituted,  under  the  directions  given  by  the  National  Industrial  Tribunal, Bombay  in  paragraph  14.8  of  its  award  published  with  the  Notification  of  the Government  of  India  in  the  Ministry  of  Labour  and  Employment  No.  S.O.  3031, dated  the  22nd  September,  1962.
[No.  F.  51/24/67-LRIH.]
SO  4095—Whereas,  the  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial dispute  exists  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  United  Commercial Bank  Limited  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the  matter  specified  in  the Schedule  hereto  annexed;
And.  whereas,  the  Central  Government  considers  it  desirable  to  refer  the
said  dispute  for  adjudication;
 
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  clause  (d)  of  sub- section  (1)  of  section  10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act.  1947  (14  of  1947),  the

Central  Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  adjudication  to  the  Indus- trial  Tribunal,  Calcutta  constituted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether  the  supersession  of  the  undermentioned  employees  of  the  United Commercial  Bank,  Calcutta  in  matters  of  promotion  to  supervisory  cadre  are justified?  If  not,  to  what  relief  are  these  employees  entitled  and  from  which date?
1.  Shri  I.  D.  Upasanl, 2.  Shri  B.  D.  Haider, 3.  Shri  C.  P.  Singh, 4.  Shri  S.  C.  Sarkar, 5.  Shri  R.  D.  Choubey, 6.  Shri  A.  B.  Mukherjee, 7.  Shri  G.  N.  Chaturvedi, ti. Shri  Ajit  Saha, 9.  Shri  P.  S.  Sankar  Narayan,
10.  Shri  N.  N.  Roy, 11.  Shri  P.  P.  Ghose  and 12.  Shri  P.  R.  Roy.
[No.  51/35/67-LRIII.]
S.  S.  SAHASRANAMAN,  Under  Secy.
(Department  of  Labour  and  Employment)
New  Delhi,  the  6th  November  1967
S.O.  4096.—In  pursuance  of  section  17 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 of 1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the  Indus- trial  Tribunal,  Jabalpur,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in  re- lation  to  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  (Post  Office  Jharia.  District  Dhanbad)  and their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  27th October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR  COURT,  JABALPUR.
Dated  October  20,  1967.
PRESENT:
Sri  G.  C.  Agarwala.—Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  NO.  103  or  1964  (DHANBAD  TRIBUNAL)
REFERENCE  No.  CGIT/LC(R)  (104)/67  (JABALPUR  TRIBUNAL).
PARTIES:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  (Post  Office  Jharia, District  Dhanbad).
AND
Their  Workmen  through  Koyla  Mazdoor  Panchayat,  P.O.  Jharia,  Distt., Dhanbad.
APPKARANCTM:
For  employers.—None. For  workmen.—None.
INDUSTRY:  Coal  Mine.
DISTRICT:  Dhanbad  (M.P.)
AWARD
 
The  following  matter  of  dispute  was  referred  to  the  Central  Government  In- dustrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  for  adjudication,  vide  Notification  No.  2/76/64-LR-II

dated  27th  August,  1964,  from  where  the  proceedings  were  transferred  to  this Tribunal  by  Government  Notification  No.  8/25/67-LRII  dated  April  25.  19G7: —
Matter  of  Dispute
(1)  Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery in  dismissing  Shri  Jogeswar  Bhuiya  underground  trammer  of  the said  Company,  with  effect  from  the  27th  April,  1964, ig  a  case  of  victi- misation.
(2)  If  so,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?
The  rase  relates  to  the  termination  of  service  of  one  workman,  Sri  Jogeswar Bhuiya,  Underground  Trammer.  Parties  have  now  compromised  the  dispute, terms  of  which  are  reproduced  in  the  annexure.  As  the  Colliery  stands  closed the  Union  and  the  workman  have  agreed  to  accept  compensation  as  stated  in  the- compromise  petition.  The  dispute  is  thus  satisfactorily  resolved  and  an  award  is recorded  accordingly.
(Sd)  G-  C.  AGARWALA,
Presiding  Officer. 20-10-1967.
ANNEXUIIE
BEFORE  THE  PRESIDING  OFFICER,  INDUSTRIAL  TRTBUNAL-CUM-LABOUK COURT  (CENTRAL),  AT  JABALPUR.
In  the  matter  of  Notification  No.  2/76/64-LRII  dated  the  27th  August,  1964.
AND
In  the  matter  of  an  Industrial  Dispute.
BETWEEN
Emj/oyers  in  relation  to  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery.
AND
Their  Workmen.
That  by  the  notification  the  following  dispute  has  been  referred  to  the  Hon'ble- Tribunal  for  adjudication,  namely;
(1)  Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  in dismissing  Shri  JoReswnr  Bhuiya,  underground  trammer  of  the  said  Company, with  effect  from  the  27th  April,  1964,  is  a  case  of  victimisation?
(2)  If  so,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?
(3)  That  since  the  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  of  M/s,  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  Co., Private  Ltd.,  has  been  closed  down  completely  with  effect  from  1st  January,  1966, the  case  of  Jogeswar  Bhuiya  has  been  discussed  between  the  parties.
(4)  That  in  view  of  the  closure  of  the  said  colliery,  Sri  Jogeshwar  Ehuiya  can- not  get  employment  even  if  re-instated,  it  was  agreed  that  Sri  Jogeswar  Bhuiya shall  also  be  paid  compensation  at  par  with  the  other  workers.  This  is,  however, without  prejudice  to  the  contention  of  either  parties  on  merit  of  the  case.
(5)  (a)  That  in  view  of  this  agreement,  Shri  Jogeswar  Bhuiya  shall  be  paid  a eum  of  Rs.  525  (Rupees  Five  hundred  and  twenty-five  only)  as  compensation •which  he  might  have  received  along  with  other  workers  in  full  and  final  satisfac- tion  of  his  dues  arising  out  of  this  Reference.
(b)  That  the  workman  or  the  Union  will  have  no  further  claim  arising  out, of  this  reference.
(c)  That  the  payment  aforesaid  has  been  made  to  the  workman,  Shri  Bhuiyar who  has  vo'imtarily  accepted  the  same  as  per  terms  of  this  compromise,  on  this the  9th  day  of  October,  1967.
(d)  That  the  parties  will  bear  their  respective  costs.

SEC. 3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA i  NOVEMBER  18,  19G7/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4365
That  in  view  of  this  Agreement  the  parties  pray  that  the  Hon'blp  Tribunal  bo pleased  to  pass  an  w a rd  In  terms  of  the  above  settlement  for  which  the  parties shall  remain  grateful,
PART  OF  AWARD For  the  Workmen:—  For  the  Employers: — Sd./-  Illegible. ,Sd./-  H.  N.  SINGH. 9-10-1967.
Director, 9-10-1967. 'Vice  President, iKoyla  Mazdoor  Panchayat  M/s,  Bengal  Jharia  Colliery  Co., Jharia.
(Private)  Ltd.
[No.  2/76/64-LRII.]
S.O.  4097.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  trie Additional  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the employers  in  relation  to  the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of  Messrs  Pure  Kustore  Col- liery  Company  Limited,  Post  Office  Kusunda  (Dhanbad)  and  their  workmen, which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD.
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1)  (d)  of  the  Industrial  Dis- putes  Act,  1947.
REFERENCE  NO.  74  OF  1967
PARTIES:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of  M/s.  Pure  Kustore Colliery  Co,,  Ltd.,  P.O.  Kusunda,  Distt.,  Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen.
PRESENT;
Shri  Nandagari  Venkata  Rao.—Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES:
For  the  Employers-Shti  B-  Mukberjee,  Chief  Personnel  Officer. For  the  Workmen.—Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Con- gress.
STATE:  Bihar.
INDUSTRY:  Coal.
Dhanbad,  iated.  the  26th  October  1967
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of  Messrs  Pure Kustore  Colliery  Co.  (P)  Ltd.,  P,  O.  Kusunda,  Distt.  Dhanbad  and  their  workmen, by  its  order  No.  2/71/65-LR.II  dated  14th  October  1965  referred  to  the  Central Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  under  section  10(1)(d)  of  the  Industrial Disputes  Act,  1E47  for  adjudication  the  dispute  in  respect  of  the  matters  specified in  the  schedule  annexed  thereto.  The  schedule  is  extracted  below:—
"SCHEDULE
(1)  Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of M/s.  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  Co.  Ltd.,  P.  O.  Kusunda,  (Dhanbad)  in terminating  with  effect  from  the  13th  May  1966  the  lien  on  the appointment  of  Shri  Dudhu  Bhar,  Miner  of  No.  4  Pit  and  placing  hi3 name  in  the  Badli  List,  is  an  act  of  victimisation?
(2)  If  so,  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
 
2.  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the  reference as  reference  No.  167  of  1967  on  its  file.  Both  the  parties  filed  their  statement  of

4366  T HE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PAKT  I I-
demands-  While  It  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribu- nal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the  Central Government  by  its  order  No.  ft/25/  67 -LRII  dated  8th  May,  1967  under  section. 33  (B)  (1)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.  Consequently  the  reference  is renumbered  on  the  file  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No.  74  of  1967.
3.  The  affected  workman,  Dudhu  Bhar  (hereinafter  referred  to  as  the  affected workman)  was  a  miner  of  No. 4 Pit  of  the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of  the  employers- in  a  permanent  post  since  a  long  time.  He  went  home  on  sanctioned  leave  with, effect  from  6th  April,  1065  to  23rd  April,  1065.  He  did  not  report  to  duty  en  the expiry  of  his  leave,  but  sent  a  medical  certificate  dated  23rd  April,  1965,  which, was  received  by  the  employers  on  27th  April,  1965.  He  presented  himself  for duty  on  17th  May,  1965,  but  the  employers  did  not  allow  him  to  resume  duty, saying  that  his  name  was  struck  of  from  permanent  rolls  and  placed  on  the  badli list.  These  facts  are  not  in  dispute.  The  case  of  the  employers  is  that  the  affected workman  did  not  send  any  application  for  extension  of  leave  along  with  the  medi- cal  certificate  dated  23rd  April,  1965,  that  the  medical  certificate  was  received bv  the  management  on  27th  April,  1065,  that  the  management  found  it  doubtful, that  by  a  registered  letter  dated  27th  March,. 1965  the  affected  workman  was informed  that  he  must  report  for  duty  on  or  before  3rd  April  1965, that  in  spite  of it  the  aflected  workman  failed  to  return  within  8  days  of  the  expiry  of  his  leave granted  to  him  and  offer  satisfactory  explanation  of  his  inability  to  return,  and, as  such,  he  automatically  lost  lien  on  his  appointment  and  his  name  was  kept  on the  badli  list,  that  he  was  Informed  accordingly  by  the  letter  dated  13th  May, 1965 and  that,  as such, the  affected  workman  automatically  lost  lien  on his  appoint- ment  as  per  conditions  of  his  service  envisaged  in  the  standing  orders.  The  emp- loyers  denied  that  there  was  any  element  of  victimisation  in  the  action  taken  by them.  They  further  stated  that  the  dispute  under  reference  was  an  individual dispute  and  not  an  industrial  dispute.  The  case  of  the  workmen  is  that  the  aflected workman  was  ill  and  was  undergoing  treatment  In  the  Coal  Mines  Welfare  Hos- pital,  at  Saraidhela,  that  on  receiving  alarminjt  news  about  the  precurious  condi- tion  of  his  wife  at  home,  he  applied  for  leave  for  a  month  from  5th  April,  1965 but  the  management  granted  him  leave  only  till  23rd  April,  196,1,  that  ut  home his  illness  continued  making  him  physically  unfit  to  move  and  to  perform  his duties  and,  as  such,  he  applied  for  extension  of  his  leave>  from  24th  April,  1965. to  14th  May,  1965,  that  actuated  by  (motive  of  victimisation  the  management arbitrarily  refused  to  grant  extension  of  leave  and  fixed  a  daad-line  for  reporting to  his  duty  on  or  before  3rd  May,  1965,  that  the  letter  dated  13th  May,  196B Informing  him  that  his  name  was  struck  off  from  permanent  rolls  and  he  has  been reduced  to  the  status  of  the  badli  workman  was  not  delivered  to  him  and  that  the action  taken  by  the  management  against  him  in  refusing  extension  of  leave  wa" discriminatory,  in  as  much  as  the  management  granted  extension  of  leave  to  43 other  workmen  solely  because  they  were  not  members  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress.
4.  The  workmen  were  represented  by  Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan Mazdoor  Congress  and  the  employers  by  Shri  B.  Mukherjee  Chief  Personnel Officer.  By  consent  of  the  workmen  Exts.  Ml  to  M4  were  marked  for  the  em- ployers  and  by  consent  of  the  employers  Exts.  "Wl,  W2  and  W3  were  marked  for the  workmen.  On  behalf  of  the  workmen  two  witnesses  were  examined  and Exts.  W4  to  W8  were  marked.  On  behalf  of  the  employers  a  witness  is  examined and  Exts.  M5  and  M6  were  marked.
5.  Raj  Ballav  Prasad,  Secretary  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  Branch  Pure Kustore  Colliery  is  examined  as  WW1.  He  has  deposed  that  the  affected  workman. was  a  member  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  during  the  years  1963-64  and  1964- 65  as  is  seen  from  the  membership  register,  the  extracts  of  which  are  Exts.W4 and  W5.  He  has  also  stated  that  the  total  membership  of  the  Pure  Kustore  Col- liery  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  was  112  in  1964-65.  In  the  cross  examination it  iselicited  from  him  that  no  resolution  was  passed  by  the  union  to  take  up  the dispute  of  the  affected  workman  and  that  the  General  Secretary  did  not  authorise him  to  place  the  dispute  of  the  affected  workman  before  the  Conciliation  Officer. But  he  has  explained  that  the  constitution  of  the  union  did  not  make  it  obligatory that  before  sponsoring  any  dispute  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  the  union  must pass; a  resolution,  that  he  was  the  Secretary  of  the  Central  Body  of  Khan  Mazdoor Congress  as  well  as  of  its  office  branch  at  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  and  that  th" General  Secretary  had  authorised  him  orally  as  r>er  the  practice  to  espouse  the cause  of  the  affected  workman  before  the  Conciliation  Officer.  There  is  no  rebut- tal  evidence.  No  question  is  put  in  this  regard  to  the  affected  workman,  WW2. In  the  statement  filed  by  them  the  employers  pleaded  ignorance  about  the  affected workman  being  a  member  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  or  any  union  at  the  relevant date  or  prior  thereto.  Hence,  I  find  no  substance  in  the  objection  of  the  employers and  hold  that  the  dispute  under  reference  was  riot  an  individual  dispute,  but
waa  an  industrial  dispute.

* "<
-  ^  .  JJ
t  .  ,  ,  ± u,  i t f u i/  .  un  *
6.  Admittedly,  the  affected  workman  was  granted  leave  with  effect  from  5th April,  1065  to  23rd  April,  1965  and  he  sent  the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  Ml  dated 2drd  April,  1965.  There  is  no  evidence  that  the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  Ml  was accompanied  by  any  application  from  the  affected  workman  for  extension  of  hla Jeave.  But,  the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  Ml  Itself  stated  that  he  required  absolute rest  for  the  period  of  three  weeks  from  24th  April,  1965  to  14th  May,  1965-  In substance,  the  certificate,  Ext,  Ml  itself  was  an  application  for  extention  of  leave. As  a  matter  of  fact  also  the  employers  treated  the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  Ml  as an  application  for  extension  of  leave,  as  is  seen  from  their  letter,  Ext.  M2  dated 27th  April,  1965,  which  directed  the  affected  workman  to  report  for  duty  en  or before  3rd  April,  1965  and  stating  that  in  default  it  would  be  presumed  that  he was  no  longer  willing  to  continue  his- service.  It  is immaterial  whether  the  affected workman  received  the  letter  or  not,  in  as  much  as  by  the  lelter  dateil  13th  May, 1965,  Ext.  M3  the  employers  terminated  the  lien  on  the  permanent  appointment  of the  affected  workman  and  put  him  on  the  badli  list.  Subsequently,  the  affected workman  appeared  before  the  employers  on  17th  May,  1965  alongwith  other medical  certificates.  Exts.  W6,  W7  and  W8  pleading  that  he  was  physically  unfit to  report  to  duty  before  17th  May,  1905,  but  the  employers  treated  the  plea  and explanation  as  belated.  From  these  admitted  facts  it  is  manifest  that  the  emplo- yers  did  not  give  an  opportunity  to  the  affected  workman  to  explain  why  he  could not  report  to  duty  earlier  than  17th  May,  1985.  Even  as  regards  the  medical certificate,  Ext.  Ml  nothing  is  stated  by  the  employers  in  their  letter,  Ext.  M2  why it  could  not  be  believed.  They  did  not  even  state  that  it  was  false.  The  only contention  of  the  employers  is  that  in  terms  of  clause  11 of  the  Standing  Orders the affected  workman  lost  lien  on  his  permanent  appointment  automatically  when  he did  not  return  to  duty  within  8  days  of  the  expiry  of  the  leave  granted  to  him. In  support  reliance  is  placed  upon  the  un-reported  judgement  of  the  Supreme Court  in  Civil  Appeal  No.  549  of  1967.  That  was  a  case  which  arose  out  of  an application  of  a  workman  filed  under  Section  33A  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act, 1947  complaining  that  the  termination  of  his  service  pending  the  industrial  dispute was  improper.  It  was  held—
"Where,  therefore,  a  standing  order  provides  that  a  workman  would  ?ose  his lien  on  his  appointment,  if  he  does  not  join  his  duty  within  certain time  after  his  leave  expires,  it  ean  only  mean  that  his  service  stnnds automatically  terminated  when  the  contingency  happens".
But  the  certified  standing  orders  relevant  to  that  case  or  S.O.(l)  in  Sec,  G  of the  certified  standing  orders  which  were  interpreted  by  his  Lordship  for  arriving at  the  conclusion  referred  to  above  are  not  produced  before  me.  S.O. (1)  in  Sec. G  of  the  standing  orders  is  not  extracted  in  the  judgement  either.  It  is  significant to  note  that  before  arriving  at  the  conclusion  his  Lordship  himself  had  observed, "the  standing  order  is  in  artistically  worded".  The  relevant  portion  of  clause  11 of the  Certified  Standing  Orders  in  the  instant  case  is—
"if  the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally  granted or  subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appointment  unless  etc.,
In  view  of  this  wording  the  interpretation  does  not  appeal  to  me  that  when  the employee  remains  absent Taeyond  the  period  of  Jeave  originally  granted  or  subse- quently  extended  the  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appointment  automatically  There are  two  more  conditions  to  be  satisfied  before  the  absentee  employee  loses  his  lien, namely  his  returning  within  8  days  and  submitting  an  explanation  to  the  satis- faction  of  the  Manager  about  his  inability  to  return  before  the  expiry  of  the  leave. It  is  manifest  that  unless  the  Manager  applies  his  mind  and  finds  the  explanation offered  as  not  satisfactory  the  lien  of  the  absentee  employee  cannot  be  lost.  It also  follows  that  to  satisfy  the  Manager  the  absentee  employee  should  have  an opportunity  to  place  the  necessary  material,  in  other  words  evidence,  in  support  of his  explanation  Thus,  the  management  cannot  terminate  the  lien  of  the  absentee employee  on  his  permanent  appointment  and  place  him  on  the  badh  list  without giving'him  an  opportunity  to  explain  and  to  produce  evidence  m  support  of  the explanation.  No  such  opportunity  was  given  to  the  affected  workman  in  the  pre- sent  case  Consequently  the  order  of  the  employers  dated  13th  May,  1965,  Ext. M3  cannot  stand.  The  workmen  did  not  lead  any  satisfactory  evidence  to  show that  the  action  taken  by  the  employers  against  the  affected  workman  wag  discrimi- natory  Therefore  it  cannot  be  said  that  the  order,  Ext.  M3  was  Passed  because he  was  the  member  of  the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  branch  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Con- gress.
 
7  T  therefore  hold  that  the  action  of  the  management  of  Pure  Kustore  Col- lierv  of  M/s  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  Co.  Ltd.,  P.  O.  Kusunda,  Dis.  Dhanbad  in terminatine  with  effect  from  13th  May  1965  the  lien  on  the  appointment  of t h m S t ed  workman,  Dudhu  Bharf  Miner  of  No.  4  Pit  a"d  placing his  name  on  the  badli  list  was  not  justified,  and,  consequently,  I  direct  that  he  be

4368  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA  :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PART  I I-
relnstated  to  his  permanent  appointment  will  effect  from  13th  May,  1965  and  be paid  all  his  wages  and  duea,  if  any,  as  though  the  lien  on  his  appointment  as  a miner  of  No.  4  Pit  of  the  Colliery  wag  never  terminated.  The  award  is  made accordingly  and  submitted  under  section  15  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.
(Sd)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.
APPENDIX  I
BKFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD REFERENCE  NO.  74  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the Pure Kustorc Collkry of  Messis  Pure  Kustore  Colilary Co,  Ltd.,  P.O.  Kusunda,Dist.Dhanbad.
AMD
Their  Workmen
List  of Documents  admitted in evidence for Employer
Description  of "document and  date
Proved by Distinguishing mark  or number
Date of admission
Whether admitted or
proved
Original  Medical certificate  daled  23-4-6^  • Office  copy  of  the  letter  dated  27-4-65  by
Ext.Mi Ext.  M.2
6-9-67 Do.
Admitted Do.
Meager  to Sri Dudhu  Bhar.
Offi.--  copy  of  the  letter  dated  13-5-65  by
Ext.  M3
Do.
Do.
Do.
M Wi
Proved
Ext;  M4 Ext.  M5 Ext.  M*
Do. D". Do.
Do.
Do.
Manager  10 Sri  Dudhu  Bhar. Copy of Certified  Standing  Order Original leave application dated  3-4-65. Copy  of  letter  dated  1st  January  T965  by Manager  to  the  Conciliation  Officer  (C), Verification, Dhanbad with  enclosure.
List  of Documents Admitted  in  evidence for  Workmen.
Description  of  document  and  date
Proved by
Whether proved
Distinguishing mark or number
Date of admission
or admitted
Copy  of  the  failure  of  conciliation  report
Admitted Ext.  Wi
6-9-67
dated  1-7-65.
Copy of the letter dated 11-6-65 from  Secre-
Ext.  W2
Do.
Do.
tary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress.
Copy of the list of 43 miners of Pure  Kustore
Ext.  W3
Do.
Do.
Colliery.
Extracl  of  membership  register  of  Khan
Ext.  W4
Do. Proved WW Mazdoor  Congress  for  1963-64.
Extract  of  membership  register  of  Khan
Do. WWI
Do,
Ext.  W5
M^zdoor  Congress for  1964-65
Out-door  patient  slip  of  Central  Hospital
W W2 Ext.  W6
Do.
Do.
dated  2-4-65.
Copy  of  the  leave  application  dated  2-4-65
Ext.  W7
Do.
Do.
Do.
by  Dudhu  Bhar.
Original  medical  certificate  dated  15-5-65 Do.
Do.
Do.
^xt.  W8
to  Dudhu  Bhar,
(Sd)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.
Central  Government  Additional Industrial  Tribunal  at  Dhanbad.

Sec.  3(if)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA  :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1839  4369
APPENDIX  II
KHFORE  TIIli  CKNTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  NO.  74  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  r.-lation  10 the  Pure  Kustore  Colliery  of  Messrs  Pure  Kustorc  Collier Co,  Hd,,  KO,  Kusunda,  Distv.  Dhantad.
AND
Their  Workmen
List of Witnesses examined on behalj of the Employees
No.  of  witness
Name  of  ihe  witness
Dute  of cxumination
Binoy  Kumar  Mukhcrjec
AlWi
6-9-67
List of witnesses examined on behalf of the workmen
No.  of  witness Name  of  the  witness
Dale of examination
Raj  Ballav  Prasad
6-9-67
Dudhu  Rajbhar
6-9-67
(Sd-)  N.  VENKATA  RAO, Presiding  Officer,
General  Government  Additional Industrial  Tribunal  at  Dhanbad.
[No.  2/71/63-LRI1.]
.  S.O.  4098.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  'Act,  1947 {14  of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  ot the  Industrial  Tribunal,  Calcutta,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers in  relation  to  the  Dutta'y  Central  Kajora  Colliery;  Post  Office  Kajoragram, District  Burdwan  and  their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Govern- ment  on  the  31st  October,  1967-
CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL,  CALCUTTA
REFERENCE  NO.  3  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  In  relation  to  the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery,
AXD
Their  workmen.
PRESENT :
Shri  S.  K.  Sen—Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES :
On  behalf  of  Employers—Shri  H-  P-  Bhalotia,  Director- On  behalf  of  Workmen—Absent.

4370  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA : NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27, 1889  [PART  I I-
STATE : West  Bengal
INDUSTRY : Coal  Mines-
AWARD
By  Order  No.  6/95/86-LRII  dated  6th  January.  1967,  the  Central  Government referred  for  adjudication  an  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in  relation to  the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery,  P.  O-  Kajoragram,  Distt.  Burdwan  and their  workmen  arising  from  the  dismissal  of Shri  Ram  Sarup  Dusad  and  Shri Jaydeb  Bhattacherjee,  Pump  Khalasis,  with  effect  from  3rd  June,  1966.
2.  According  to  the  management  the  Agent  Shri  Hariram  Rajpuria  along with  some  other  persons  went  down  the  pit  No-  2 of the  mine  during  the  night shift  of  3rd  May,  1966-  At  about  1.30  A.M. of  4th  May,  1966  they  found  the  two pump  Khalasis  Ram  Sarup  Dusad  and  Jaydeb  Bhattacherjee  sleeping  at No  80  H-  P.  pump  although  the  place  of duty  of  Ram  Sarup  Dusad  was  at the cross  cut  pump  which  is  about  1000'  from  the  80  H.  P.  pump.  Separate  charge- sheets  were  drawn  up  against  each  of  the  two  pump  khalasis  on  9th  May,  1966 and  they  submitted  replies  on  10th  May,  1966  claiming  that  they  were  alert  and not  sleeping.  Thereafter  enquiries  were  held  by  one  of the  Officers  of the colliery,  Shri  M-  W.  Haque  on  18th  May,  1966-  The  enquiring  officer  reported that  the  charge  of  sleeping  on  duty  was  proved  against  each  of  the  two  workmen- Thereupon  the  director  Shri  H-  P. Bhalotla  passed  orders  of  dismissal on 3rd  June,  1966.
3.  According  to the  written  statement  of the  union,  the  Colliery  Mazdoor Sabha,  the  two  workmen  were  taking  active  part  In the  work  of the  newly established  unit  of the  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  at the  colliery  and  therefore  the management  started  false  cases  against  them  and  dismissed  them  and  dismissal in  the  circumstances  amounted  to  victimisation.
4  At  the  hearing  however  the  union  and  the  workmen  have  not  been  repre- sented.  The  case  was  originally  fixed  for  hearing  on  29th  August,  1967.  On the  prayer  of both  the  union  and  the  management  the  hearing  was  adjourned to  4th  October,  1967.  On  28th  September,  1967  on  the  application  of the  union, adjournmentwas  allowed  as  a special  case  to  26th  October  1967.  On  that  day no  body  appeared  on  behalf  of  the  union  nor  was  any  application  for  adjournment received.  Accordingly,  the  case  was  taken  up  ex-pqrte.
5  On  behalf  of the  management  Shri  Hariram  Rajpuria,  Agent  of the cillery  deposed  as  a witness  to  prove  the  inspection  report,  Ext  A  which  was
ElsS^^^^^
S^S^^^^'f^^SS  wi^the^ cUe-ffi& workmen  wire  Ilso  examined  and  they  stated  that  they  were  merely  sitting Z wn  and  not  sleeping  when  the  agent  came  and  challenged  them  for  seeping
Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  at the  colliery.
ft Mv  award  therefore  is that  the  dismissal  of Shri  Sarup  Dusad  and  Shri TovriPh  BhattacharW[by  the  management  of the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery wlthtflecffrom  3rd  June,  196^,  wa*  justified  and  the  workmen  are  not  therefore entitled  to any  relief.
(Sd.)  S.  K.  SEN,
Dated,  26th  October,  1967-
* " * **  ™cer' [No.  6/95/66-LRII.]
S O  4099.—In  pursuance  of  section  17 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act  1947  (14 of
 
received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October,  1967-

SEC  3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  QF INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  437 j
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVT.  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-Ct/M-LABOUR COURT,  JABALPUR.
Dated  October  21,  1967.
PRESENT:
Shrl  G.  C-  Agarwala—Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  CASE  NO-  126/64  (DHANBAD  TRIBUNAL) REFERENCE  NO-  CGIT7LC(R)  6]/67  (JABALPUB  TRIBUNAL)
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Jamadoba  Colliery,  P.  O-  Jealgora,  District Dhanbad-
Versus
Their  workmenmen  through  the  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh,  P.  O.  Jealgora, District  Dhanbad.
APPEARANCES:
For  Employers—Shri  S.  N.  Singh,  Dy.  Chief  Personnel  Officer.
For  Workmen—Shri  B.  N.  Sharma,  President  Congress  Mazdopr  Sangh,.
Bihar-
AWARD
By  Notification  No-  2/119/64-LR1I  11th  November,  1964,  the  Ministry  of Labour  and  Employment,  referred  the  following  matter  of  dispute,  as  stated  in the  schedule  to  the  order  of  reference,  to  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,, Dhanbad  for  adjudication.
Matter  of  Dispute
(1)  Whether  the  suspension  of  Shri  K.  N.  Ojha,  Clerk  of  Jamadoba  Colliery of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  and  Steel  Company  Limited,  Jamadoba,  Post office  Jealgora  (District  Dhanbad)  for  10  days  with  effect  from  the 6th  July,  1964  by  the  management  of  the  said  Colliery  was  justified  ?
(2)  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workmen  entitled ?
The  proceedings  remained  pending  before  the  said  Tribunal  till  transferred to  this  Tribunal  by  order  No.  8/25/67LRII,  dated,  25th  April,  1967.
The  workmen  represented  by  the  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh  filed  their  written statement  before  the  Dhanbad  Tribunal.  Ifhe  employers  filed  the  statement before  this  Tribunal.  After  a  few  dates,  the  case  came  up  ultimately  for  hearing on  1st  September,  1967  at  Asansol.  It  appeared  that  as  the  dispute  was  a  petty one,  it  could  be  amicably  settled  and  for  which  representatives  of  the  parties took  time.  It  was  however  not  resolved  and  the  case  was  ultimately  heard  on-. 7th  October,  1967  at  Dhanbad,  The  employers  examined  one  witness,  Shri Lalblharl  Mahato,  a  clerk,  to  prove  pay  sheets  Ex.  E.  1 to  E.  3  and  a  statement of  mistakes  committed  by  the  workmen  concerned,  Shri  K.  N.  Ojha,  while  pre- paring  these  sheets  and  prepared  by  the  Accounts  Clerk  which  was  marked  as Ex.  E.  4.  The  remaining  documents  filed  on  behalf  of  the  management  were admitted  and  were  marked  Ex.  E.  5  to  Ex.  E.  13.  On  behalf  of  the  workmen one  document  was  filed  as  W.  1  which  is  a  communication  dated,  28th  May,  1963 intimating  the  list  of  office  bearers  of  the  Union  and  which  includes  the  name of  Shri  K-  N.  Ojha  as  one  of  the  Vice  Presidents.  Ojha  also  examined  himself.
The  facts  are  simple.  The  workmen  concerned,  to  be  hereinafter  called  Ojha, was  a  clerk  in  Grade  II  having  been  in  service  for  over  21  years-  He  had  been a  Dhowrah  clerk  and  magazine  clerk  before  he  was  transferred  m  early  March as  bill  clerk.  He  protested  and  represented  to  the  management  by  means  of  an application  dated  3rd  March,  19B4  (Ex-  E.  1} that  he  would  not  be  able  to  work as  Bill  Clerk  and  Insinuated  that  the  transfer  was  motivated  by  way  of  harass- ment  and  victimisation  as  he  was  an  office-bearer  of  the  Union.  The  management turned  down  the  request  and  intimated  that  the  allegation  of  victimisation  was baseless  (Ex.  E.  6).  Ojha  was  not  attending  to  his  duty  Properly  and  did  not familiarise  himself,  with  the  work-  He  was  given  an  Assistant  for  about  four weeks  whereafter  the  help  was  withdrawn.  The  Accounta-incharge,  Shri  D,  p.

4372  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PART  II-
Banerji,  however,  found  that  Ojha  was  not  Improving  and  submitted  a  report  to the  manager  on  11th  April,  1964  on  which  Ojha  waa  warned.  He,  however,  did not  pick  up  and  the  Accounts-incharge,  Shri  Banerji  after  checking  the  Pay Sheets  Ex.  E.  1  to  Ex.  E.  3  submitted  a  report  on  4th  June,  1984  Ex.  E.  4 to the Manager  pointing  out  the  various  mistakes  committed  by  Ojha.  On  the  basis of  this,  charge-sheet  dated  11th  June,  1904  was  served,  Ex-  E.  8-  Ojha  submitted .a  long  explanation  and  contended  that  as  he  had  not  worked  as  Bill  Clerk  before, the  mistakes  were  natural  and  the  charge-sheet  has  malafide-  An  enquiry  was ordered  on  18th  June,  1964  (Ex.  E.  9)  which  was  held  by  the  Welfare  Officer  on 26th  June,  1964.  Witnesses  of  management  were  examined  including  the  Accounts- incharge  Shri  D.  P.  Banerji,  the  Head  Clerk  Shri  A.  P.  Varma,  the  Senior  Welfare Officer,  Shri  S-  N.  Pandey  and  they  were  all  cross-examined  by  Ojha.  In  his .statement,  he  stated  that  he  had  nothing  more  to  add  then  what  was  given  in  his -explanation  and  he  produced  no  defence-  The  enquiry  Officer  submitted  a  detailed finding  Ex-  E.  11  on  26th  June,  1964.  On  the  basis  of  this,  under  clause  19(6)  of the  Standing  Orders,  he  was  punished  with  suspension  for  10  days  with  effect from  fith  July,  1984.  It  Js  difficult  to  comprehend  any  merit  in  the  dispute  raised by  the  Union.  Merely  because  he  was  an  office-bearer  of  the  Union,  he  cannot have  a  carte  blanche  any  negligence  and  to  continue  to  ignore  his  duties.  He was  a  cerk  and  was  in  same  Grade  II  and  there  was  no  oblique  motive  on  the part  of  the  management  to  transfer  him  as  a  Bill  Clerk.  He  had  been  accomo- dated  and  given  an  Assistant  to  familiarise  the  working  and  it  was  his  own  fault ii  he  did  not  pick  up  even  then.  He  had  been  warned  to  improve  on  the  report •of  the  Accounts-incharge.  The  mistakes  committed  by  him  in  the  pay  sheets were  numerous  and  were  errors  of  simple  arithmatical  calculations-  Obviously, he  had  been  negligent  which  was  wiliul  and  the  management  was  perfectly  justi- fied  in  taking  diciplinary  proceedings.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  a  very  lenient  view had  been  taken  in  the  matter  of  punishment.  If  the  management  had  been minded  to  vitimise  him,  a  more  severe  punishment  including  dismissal,  could have  been  inflicted.  The  very  fact  that  a  very  lenient  punishment  of  suspension lor  10  days  alone  was  awarded  is  a  clear  proof  of  their  bonafldes.
Decisions
The  Management  was  perfectly  justified  in  the  punishment  of  suspension  of •Shri  K.  N-  Ojha  for  10  days  and  he  is  not  entitled  to  any  relief.  No  order  for
(Sd.)  G.  C  AGARWALA, Presiding  Officer
21-10-67
[No.  2/119/64-LRIL]
S O  4100.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947 <14  of  1947)  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award of  the  Industrial  Tribunal,  Calcutta,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  em- ployers  in  relation  to  the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery,  Post  Office  Kajora- 
CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL,  CALCUTTA
REFERENCE  NO-  151  OF  1966
J'AKTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery,
AND
Their  workmen.
"PRESENT:
Shri  S-  K-  Sen—Presiding  Officer.
APPIAHANCES:
On  behalf  of  Employers—Shri  H.  P-  Bhalotla,  Director- On  behalf  of  Workmen.—Absent.
STATE:  West  Bengal
INDUSTRY:  Coal  Mines.
AWARD
By  Order  No.  6/M/66-LRII  dated  1st  December.  1966,  the  Central  Govern-
ffient  r^erred  for  adjudication  an  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers

in  relation  to  the  Dutta's  Central  Kajora  Colliery,  P.O.  Kajoragram,  District Burdwan  and  their  workmen  arising  from  the  dismissal  ol  Shri  Budhiram  Hari- jan,  Dresser,  with  effect  from  the  3rd  June,  1&S6,
2.  Budhiram  Harijan  had  been  granted  leave  by  the  management  from  28th March,  I960  to  3 6th  April,  1966  and  was  due  to  join  at  the  colliery  on  17th  April, 1966.  He  failed  to  turn  up  on  that  date  but  came  about  a  month  later  on  16th May,  1966.  He  was  not  permitted  to  join  on  that  day  and  he  was  charge-sheeted for  unauthorised  absence  for  over  10  days.  The  "workman  submitted  a  reply- stating  that  he  was  ill  and  he  had  sent  an  application  for  extension  of  leave1 and  that  he  had  also  produced  medical  certificate  on  arrival  at  the  colliery. According  to  the  management  however  no  application  for  extension  of  leave wan  received  and  no  medical  certificate  was  produced  by  the  workman  when he  came  back  OJI 16th  May,  1966  to  Ihe  colliery.  An  enquiry  was  held  by  the Agent,  Shri  Hariram  Rajpuria  on  20th  May,  1966  at  which  the  manager  and the  leave  register  clerk  gave  evidence.  On  the  report  of  the  charge  having proved  the  Director,  Shri  H.  R,  Bhalotia  passed  an  order  of  dismissal  on  3rd June,  I960.
3.  According  to  the  written  statement  filed  by  the  union,  the  dismissal amounted  to  victimisation  as  Budhiram  Harijan  was  taking  a  prominent  part in  the  activities  of  the  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  which  had  recently  established a  unit  at  the  colliery.  According  to  the  union  further  the  dismissal  was  a  sum- mary  dismissal  without  any  departmental  enquiry.
4.  At  the  hearing  however  the  union  and  the  workman  have  not  been  r e- presented.  The  case  was  originally  fixed  for  hearing  on  20th  August,  1&67.  On the  applications  both  by  the  union  and  the  management  the  hearing  was  ad- journed  to  3rd  October,  1967.  On  28th  September,  1967  the  union  came  up  with another  application  for  adjournment  and  as  a  special  case  the  adjournment  was allowed,  the  case  being  shifted  to  26th  October,  1967  for  hearing.  On  the  ad- journed  date  of  hearing  however  nobody  appeared  on  behalf  of  the  union  nor was  any  application  for  adjournment  received.  Accordingly,  the  case  was  taken up  ex-parte.
5.  The  management  examined  one  witness,  namely  Shri  Hariram  Rajpuria, the  Agent  who  held  the  enquiry.  The  record  of  the  enquiry  Ext.  C  shows  that the  enquiry  was  properly  held.  Accordingly  the  order  of  dismissal  must  be held  to  be  in  order.  Shri  Rajpuria  has  denied  the  suggestion  made  by  the- union  in  its  written  statement  that  there  was  any  victimisation  on  account  of trade  union  activities,
6.  My  award  therefore  is  that  the  management  was  justified  in  dismissing- Shri  Budhiram  Harijan,  Dresser,  with  effect  from  3rd  June,  1S66  and  the  work- man  is  not  entitled  to  any  relief.
(Sd.)  S.  K.  SEN,
Presiding  Officer- New  Delhi,  the  26th  October  1967
[No.  6/94/66-LRII.I
New  Delhi,  ihe  1th  November  1967
S.O.  4101.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1E47  (14 of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Industrial  Tribunal,  Jabalpur,  in  the  industrial  dispute  bettween  the  employers in  relation  to  the  Burhar  and  Amlai  Collieries  of  Messrs  Rewa  Coalfields  Limited, Post  Office  Dhanpuri,  District  Shahdol  (Madhya  Pradesh)  and  their  workmen, which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR  COURT,  JABALPUR.
Dated  October  21, 19G7.
PRESENT:
Shri  G.  C.  Agarwala.—Presiding  Officer.
REFEIOTNCE  NO. CGIT/LC  39  or  1966.
PARTIES:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Burhar  and  Amlai  Collieries,  P.O.,  Dhanpuri..
bistt,  Shahdol  (M.P.).
Versus
Their  workmen  through  the  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha,  P.O.  Dhan—
puri,  Distt.,  Shahdol.

< .
• •  - '-
I*
AFFIARANCES:
For  employers.—S/Shri  Ujagar  Singh  and  S,  D.  Singh,  Labour  Officers. For  workmen.—Sri  P.  K.  Thakur,  Vice-Presldent.
AWAED
The  following  disputed  matter  as  stated  under  two  issues  of  the  schedule  to the  order  of  reference,  was  referred  to  this  Tribunal  by  Notification  No.  5/15/66- LRII  dated  17th  October,  1966,  by  the  Ministry  of  Labour,  Employment  and  Re- habilitation,  Government  of  India.
Matter  of  Dispute.
1.  Whether  the  management  of  Burhar  and  Amlai  Collieries  was  justified  in transferring  Sarvashri  Mohammed  Khan  and  Sahabdin  from  Surface duty  as  chowkidars  to  underground  work  in  their  Mine  No.  3  and consequently  accepting  their  resignation;  if  not  to  what  relief  are the  workmen  entitled?
2.  In  case  the  management  was  justified  in  its  action,  whether  these  work-
men  are  entitled  to  any  relief  in  view  of  their  long  service.
The  dispute  was  sponsored  by  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  in  conciliation and  the  said  Union  continued  to  represent  the  workmen  in  these  proceedings. After  pleadings  were  filed,  the  employers  raised  51 question  by  means  of  an  appli- cation,  27/A  that  the  Union,  of  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  amalgamated with  another  union  known  as  Co^iery  Labour  Union  and  was,  therefore,  non- •existent  so  as  to  be  capable  of  representation.  Proceedings  on  merits  were  there- fore  stayed  and  the  question  was  determined  as  a  preliminary  point  by  an  order •dated  7th  April,  1967.  It  was  held  that  the  plea  of  amalgamation  was  ineffective and  that  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  continued  to  exist  so  as  to  be  capable •of  representing  the  workmen.  The  employers  then  took  a  few  dates  to  enable them  to  file  a  writ  petition  against  my  order  in  the  Hon'ble  High  Court  and ultimately  intimated  that  they  would  not  do  so.  The  hearing-  therefore  com- menced  on  16th  September,  1967,  when  the  workmen  examined  two  witnesses, namely  both  the  workmen  concerned,  Mohammad  Khan  and  Sahabddin.  The employers  examined  four  witnesses  S/Shrl  S.  K.  Sineh,  Manager  of  Burhar  Col- liery  Mine  No.  3,  Z.  Warsi  E.W.  2  Labour  Welfare  Officer,  Sri  Gulam  Mohammad E.W.  3  and  Sri  Sahabddin  E.W.  4.  Both  parties  filed  some  documents  and  pro- ved  the  same,  the  workmen  filing  six  documents  marked  Ex.  Wl  to  W.6  and  the employers  nine  documents  Ex.  El  to  E9.
 
The  facts  leading  to  the  dispute  are  that  both  Mohammad  Khan  and  Sahabddin were  regular  permanent  employees  of  about  20  years  or  more  standing  with  the employers,  Rewa  Coal  fields  Limited.  Mohammad  Khan  was  Chowkldar  of  the Magazine  and  Sahabddin  was  a  General  mazdoor  in  the  Central  Workshop.  Both had  been  rendering  surface  duties,  Mohammad  Khan  mostly  as  Chowkidar.  On account  of  Pakistan  aggression  in  September.  1965,  the  management  considered it  expedient  to  transfer  them  from  the  Magazine  and  Workshop  and  consequently by  an  order  dated  22nd  September,  1965,  (Ex.  E.  7)  these  along  with  five  others were  transferred  to  Mine  No.  3  as  General  Mazdoors.  According  to  these  work- men,  they  were  directed  to  work  underground  in  the  mine  as  General  Mazdoors. Since  they  had  been  rendering  surface  duties  and  were  physically  incapable  of -working  underground,  they  requested  the  management  to  allot  surface  duty  but were  denied  and  had  been  kept  unemployment.  The  management  has  denied  that they  were  required  to  do  underground  duties.  According  to  the  management, because  of  the  panic  prevailing  among  Muslims,  both  these  tendered  their  resigna- tions  Mohammad  Khan  on  25th  September,  1957,  by  meana  of  (Ex.  E.I)  and Sahioddin  in  by  means  of  (Ex.  3)  dated  8th  October,  1967.  These  resignations were  accepted.  The  workmen  requested  that  they  be  paid  their  dues.  This  could not  be  finalised  and  was  in  the  process  of  flnalisation  when  the  union  took  up the  dispute in  conciliation.  At  the  instance  of  the  Conciliation  Officer,  the  manage- ment  agreed  to re-employ  them  or  in  the  alternative  to  pay  them  Pension/Gratuity, a  demand  which  the  union  itself  had  pressed.  The  management  accepted  the  offer and  communicated  this  to  both  the  workmen  by  means  of  letters  dated  14th  April, 1966  (Ex.  E.  4)  followed  by  another  letter  dated  26th  July,  1966,  (Ex.  E.  3). None  of  these  were  interested  in  re-employment.  Mohammad  Khan,  however, applied  for  Pension /Gratuity  by  means  of  (Ex.  E.  2)  and  while  this  was  under the  flnalisation  stage,  this  reference  was  made.  Consequently  both  these  work- men  have  not  been  paid  Pension /Gratuity.  The  management  brought  the  fact to  the  notice  of  the  conciliation  machinery  and  also  the  Ministry,  contending  that there  was  no  dispute  left  for  reference.  But  the  management  has  been  advised

"*:  . 18,
by  the  Ministry  that  it  can  take  up  the  point  before  the  Tribunal.  It  is,  there- fore,  contended  that  there  is  really  no  dispute  left  for  determination  as  this  has already  been  resolved  in  conciliation.
From  the  issues  referred  for  adjudication,  the  wordings  of  Issue  No.  1  are, however,  significant.  The  issue  presupposes  that  both  S/Shri  Mohammad  Khan and  Sahabddin  were  (1)  Chowkidars  (2)  that  they  were  transferred  from  gurface •duty  to  underground  work  (3)  that  they  tendered  their  resignations.  The  only point  to  be  determined  under  the  issue  Is  whether  the  management  was  justified in  transferring  them  and  in  accepting  the  resignations-  It  Is,  therefore,  not  open  to the  management  to  contend,  as  they  attempted  to  do  that  the  two  workmen  were Teally  not  Chowkidars  but  were  mazdoors  and  also  that  they  were  not  transferred for  underground  work  in  the  mine.  Similarly,  it  is  not  open  to  the  workmen  to urge  that  they  had  not  tendered  their  resignations.  It  will  have  to  be  assumed that  the  both  workmen  were  Chowkidars,  that  they  Were  transferred  and  were required  to  do  underground  work,  and  that  the  two  workmen  had  tendered  their resignations  which  were  accepted
On  facts  also,  it  is  manifest  that  atleast  Mohammad  Khan  had  been  a  Chowki- rlar  throughout  and  was  a  Maganlse  Chowkidar  at  the  time  of  transfer.  Sahabddin was  actually  not  a  Chowkidar  but  a  General  Mazdoor  working  in  the  Workshop,  a fact  admitted  by  him-  It  is  also  evident  that  on  transfer  for  which  the  employers had  a  right,  thev  were  not  given  surface  duties  but  were  required  to  do  under- ground  work.  This  is  evident  by  the  wordings  of  the  resignations  (Ex.  El)  and (Ex-  E3).  In  both  these,  the  workmen  concerned  had  contended  that  they  were being  required  to  do  underground  work  and  which  they  were  Incapable  of  render- ing.  The  various  office  endorsements,  both  of  the  Labour  Welfare  Officer  and  the Manager  would  Indicate  that  none  of  them  controverted  the  nssei-tion-  The  evid- ence  of  the  Manager  Sri  S.  K.  Stnha,  and  of  the  Welfare  Officer.  Sri  Z-  Warsi, therefore  cannot,  be  accepted  that  these  workmen  had  not  been  required  to  do underground  work,  as  general  mazdoors.  Sri  Sinha  has  stated  that  even  though the  assertion  was  wrong,  and  the  Labour  Welfare  Officer  considered  it  to  be  a  lame excuse  he  did  not  consider  it  necessary  to  call  the  workmen  to  enquire  why  they "had  made  wronjj  allegation.  If  these  workmen  had  not  been  given  underground duty,  they  could  not  have  marie  this  clear  assertion  in  the  resignation  letters  and in  the  ordinary  course,  the  management  would  have  contradicted  and  refuted  the wrong  assertion.  The  irresistible  inference  Is  that  they  in  fact  had  been  required to  render  underground  duties  as  general  mazdoors  by  the  management.  This  was clearly  an  unjustified  act  and  WRS rather  a  change  in  the  terms  of  service  conditions under  section  9A. of  I.  D-  Act.  particularly  for  Mohammad  Khan  was  a  Chowkidar.
As  to  the  resignation  letters  (Ex.  E.3)  the  concerned  workmen  Mohammad Khan  anri  Sahabddin  cannot  be  believed  that  thev  had  not  submitted  them  volun- tarily  Their  statements  that  the  manager  obtained  their  signatures  or  blank papers  ar°  hard  to  believe.  They  were  not  willing  to  work  underground  and because  of  the  prevailing  panic  amonn  Muslims,  they  chose  to  resign  and  wanted settlement  of  their  accounts.  The  main  reason  for  their  resignation,  however,  was that  thev  were  beinp  required  to  do  underground  work  The  finding  on  the  main oart  of  +be Issue  Nn  1 theref->re  is  that  the  management  was  not  iustifled  in  trans- ferring  the  two  workmen  to  do  underground  work  and  accepting  their  resignations. As  to  the  second  part  of  the  issue  about  the  relief  and  which  is  also  stated under  issue  No.  2.  the  two  workers  are  not  entitled  to  remstatetaent  They  both and  the  Union  itself  were  keen  to  have  the  benefit  of  Pension/Gratuity  as  would atjpear  from  the  conciliation  report  appended  with  the  order  of  reference  The offer  in  conciliation  was  accepted  bv  the  management  and  in  consequence  thereof the  management  sent  two  communications,  one  dated  14th  April,  1966  (Ex.  £..4) and  another  dated  ?6th  Julv.  1966  (Ex.  E5)  making  the  offer.  In  furtherance  of this  Shri  Mohammad  Khan  filled  up  his  Pension/Gratuity  application  as  is  evidtnt bv  letter  (Ex  E8)  and  the  application  form  (Ex.  E.2).  The  management  is  will- ing  to  pay  the  Pension/Gratuity  of  these  workmen  and  to  this  alsone  they  are entitle.
Decision
The  result  is  that  although  the  two  concerned  workmen  Mohammad  Khan  and Sahabddin  were  wrongly  required, to  do  undeground  work  in  the  mine,  in. conse- quence  of  which  they  tendered  their  resignations,  yet  they  are  not  entitled  to reinstatement  but  are  entitled  only  to  Pension/Gratuity  as  may  be  admissible  to them  under  rules  of  the  company.  No  order  for  costs.
(861.)  G.  C-  AGAHWALA,
 
Presiding  Officer. 21-10-1987. [No.  5/13/88-LBIL]

-.
li
,IA  ?\^\ZInJPursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industries  Disputes  Act  194T AAJS,  Pi  i16  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Add tlonal  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  and  Steel Company,  Jamadoba,  Post  Office  Jealgora,  District  Dhanbad  and  their  workmen,, wnlch  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October.  1967-
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL. AT  DHANBAD
In  the  mutter  of  a  reference  under  section  lO(l)(d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes-
R'WERENCE  No.  82  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  cf  M/s.  Tata  Iron  &  SteeJ Company,  Jamadoba,  P-O-  Jealgora,  Dist-  Dlianbad.
AND
Their  Workmen
PRESENT ;
Shri  Nandagiri  Venkata  Rao,  Presiding  Officer-
APPEARANCES :
STATE;  Bihar.
For  the  Employers:~Shri  L.  H-  Parvatlyar,  Legal  Assistant For  the  Workmen;—Shri  Ram  Mitra,  Secretary,  B har  Koyla  Mazdoor  Sabha- INDUSTRY:  CoaL
Dhanbad,  dated  the  26th  October,  1967.
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  & Steel  Company,  Jamadoba,  P.O  Jealgora,  Dist-  Dhanhad  and  their  workmen,  by its  order  No.  2/111/65-LRII  dated  11th  November  1965  referred  to  the  Central Government  Industrial  Tribunal.  Dhanbad  under  section  10(1 )(d)  of  the  Industrial Disputes  Act,  1947  for  adjudication  the  dispute  in  resn?ct  of  the  matters  specifle-J In  the  schedule  annexed  thereto-  The  schedule  is  extracted  below:
SCHEDULE
"(1)  Whether  the  management  of  Digwadih  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Tron  & Steel  Company  Limited,  P.O.  Jealgora,  District  Dhanbad,  were  justi- fied  in  striking  off  from  the  rolls,  the  lien  of  Shri  Ram  Autar,  Miner, 16  Seam  Ticket  number  3211  with  effect  from  21st  November,  1964?
(2)  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
2-  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the  refer- ence  as  reference  No.  183  of  19G5 on  its  file.  Both  the  parties  filed  their  statement of  demands.  While  it  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrial  Tri- bunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the  Central Government  by  its  order  No.  8/25/67-LRII  dated  8th  May  1967  under  sectiorr 33(B)(i)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  ]947-  Consequently,  the  reference  Is  re- numbered  on  the  file  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No-  82  of  1967-
 
3  The  affected  workman,  Ram  Autar  (herein-after  referred  to  as  the  affected workman)  was  a  minor  in  16  seam  having  Ticket  number  3211  in  Digwadih Colliery  of  the  employers-  He  was  granted  21  days  leave  with  effect  from  19th October  1964.  While  on  leave  he  sent  a  telegram  dated  mh  November  1904  to  the Chief  Mlningg  Engineer,  Tata's  office  Jamadoba,  Dhanbad  stating  that  he  was  HI and  unable  to  attend-  It  was  received  by  the  management  of  Digwadih  Co hery on  20th  November  1964.  On  20/21st  November  1964  the  Manager  of  the  colliery sent  a  letter  to  him  that  his  extension  of  leave  was  not  granted  and  as  such,  his name  was  being  struck  off  on  roll  and  put  on  'badli'  list.  These  facts  are  not  in dispute.  The  case  of  the  workmen  Is  that  while  he  was  at  his  native  home  during the  granted  leave,  the  affected  workman  was  attacked  with  Typhoid  that  he  was under  treatment  of  Chekitsa  Adhikari,  State  Unani  Dispensary  Bahuwa,  Rae- Bareli  from  8th  November  1964  to  28th  December  1984,  that  as  his  condition  was

ML. 3(11)1 lnc'  bALZllb  Ot  HSUIA. nUVtMJOt.^ IS,  lbo//nA^llnA  <,/,  1
serious  it  was  beyond  his  control  to  join  duty  on  the  expiry  of  his  leave,  that  he applied  for  an  extension  of  his  leave  uptq  28th  December,  1964,  that  a  medical certificate  along  with  a  petition  for  extension  of  leave  was  sent  to  the  manage- ment  and  also  a  telegram  to  the  Chief  Mining  Engineer  that  on  29th December,  1964  he  reported  for  duty  and  submitted  a  medical  certificate  of  his fitness  and  that  the  management  refused  to  allow  him  to  join  duty  and  struck  off his  name  without  holding  any  enquiry  or  giving  him  any  chance  to  explain  his conduct-  The  stand  taken  by  the  employers  is  that  the  affected  workman  did not  report  to  duty  on  the  expiry  of  the  granted  leave,  instead  sent  a  telegram  dated 13th  November,  1964  wihout  mentioning  his  Ticket  number  or  the  name  of  the colliery  in  which  he  was  employed  to  the  Chief  Mining  Engineer,  Jamadoba, Dhanbad,  that  it  took  sometime  to  find  out  his  identity,  that  a  letter  dated 19/21st  November,  1964 was  sent  by  the  Manager  to  him,  informing  him  that  as  he failed  to  resume  his  duty  -within  8  days  of  the  expiry  of  the  granted  leave  he  had lost  lien  on  his  appointment  as  per  condition  of  service  envisaged  in  the  Standing Orders  and  had  been  kept  in  the  badli  list  and  that  he  was  again  informed  by  the letter  dated  20/21st  November,  1964  that  he  has  been  kept  in  the  badli  list.  They denied  that  the  affected  workman  had  sent  any  application  for  extension  of  leave accompanied  by  a  medical  certificate  or  that  he  reported  to  duty  on  29th  December, 1964  and  submitted  a  fitness  certificate  from  a  Doctor.  The  employers  also  took an  objection  against  sustainability  of  the  reference,  pleading  that  the  dispute Involved  in  it  was  an  individual  dispute  and  not  an  industrial  dispute-  The workmen  were  represented  by  Shri  Ram  Mitra,  Secretary,  Bihar  Koyla  Mazdoor Sabha  and  the  employers  by  Shri  L-  H.  Parvatiyar,  Legal  Assistant-  By  consent of  the  workmen  Exts.  M  1  to  M  4  were  marked-  On  behalf  of  the  workmen  a witness  was  examined  and  Ext.  W  1  was  marked.  On  behalf  of  the  employe,?* no  witness  was  examined.
4-  The  order  under  reference  stato-j  that  the  Central  Government  was  of epinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  e>-..:?ted  between  the  parties-  The  order  of reference  was  accompanied  by  a  c  oy  of  the  failure  report  of  the  Conciliation Officer-  The  report  points  out  that  the  dispute  was  izpresented  before  the  Con- ciliation  Officer  on  behalf  of  the  a ""ctei  workman  by  '.he  Secretary,  Bihar  Koyla Ma'door  Sabha.  Thus,  the  onus  was  lying  on  the  eiv?loyers  to  prove  that  the dispute  involved  in  the  reference  was  not  an  industrial  dispute  but  was  merely an  individual  dispute.  But  the  employers  neither  examined  any  witness  nor brought  on  record  any  material  to  substantiate  the  objection  taken  by  them- Further,  they  expressed  their  ignorance  if  the  affected  workman  was  a  member  of Bihar  Koyla  Mazdoor  Sabha  or  any  union  on  or  before  21st  November,  1964-  On behalf  of  the  workmen  the  Secr';iaiy,  Bihar  Koyla  Mazdoor  Sabha  examined himself  as  WW  1,  He  has  deposed  that  the  affected  workman  was  a  member  of the  Branch  union  of  Bihar  Koyla  Mazdoor  Sabha  at  Digwadih  Colliery  of  the employers,  having  become  a  member  of  the  thereof  on  28th  May,  1961-  He  gave evidence  with  the  helr>  of  the  membership  register  and  got  marked  the  relevant entry  in  it  as  Ext.  W  1.  On  this  material  I  have  no  hesitation  to  hold  that  the objection  raised  by  the  employers  is  devoid  of  substance.
 
5.  Admittedly,  the  affected  workman  was  granted  leave  of  21  days  with  effect from  19th  October,  1964  and  he  did  not  join  on  the  expiry  of  the  leave  but  sent the telegram  dated  13th November.  1964, Ext.  M 2 to the  Chief  Mining  Engineer,  Tata Iron  Office,  Jamadoba,  Dhanbad  informing  him  about  his  illness.  It  is  true  that  the telegram  was  not  addressed  to  the  Manager  of  the  Digwadih  Colliery  where  the affected  workman  was  a  miner.  But  it  was  received  by  the  Manager  of  Digwadih Colliery  before  the  letter  dated  20/21st  November,  1964,  Ext.  M  3  was  despatched to  the  affected  workman,  informing  him  that  his  name  had  been  struck  of  from roll  and  put  on  badli  list-  It  is  also  true  that  the  workmen  have  not  proved  that the  affected  workman  had  sent  an  application  for  extension  of  his  leave  upto 28th  December.  1964,  accompanied  by  a  medical  certificate  The  pmployers  a>5- did  not  prove  that  before  they  received  the  telegram,  Ext.  M 2 they  sent  any  letter to  th°  affected  workman.  Clause  9  of  the  standing  orders  relied  upon  by  the employers  states  that  an  employee,  who  due  to  illiteracy  does  not  apply  in  writing must  apply  verbally-  The  telegram,  Ext.  M  2  cannot  be  worse  than  oral  applica- tion-  Whatever  that  mav  be,  the  employers  terminated  the  lien  on  the  appoint- ment  of  the  affected  workman  and  placed  his  name  on  the  badli  list  only  through

i  u  ( I,  li  w  [ I A HI  11—
Ext.  M 3 which  was  issued  after  receiving  the  telegram,  Ext.  M  2 from  the  affected workman  informing  that  he  was  unwell  and  unable  to  attend  to  duty.  It  is  also admitted  by  the  employers  that  no  enquiry  was  held  nor  was  the  affected  workman given  any  opportunity  to  explain  bis  over-stay  of  the  granted  leave  before  his  lieu on  appointment  was  terminated.  The  employers  tried  to  justify  their  action  on clause  9 of  the  standing  oid?rs.  contending  that  the  alfected  '.v.-irkmaii  automatically lost  his  lien  on  his  appointment  when  he  did  not  return  within  8  clays  of  expiry of  the  granted  leave  and  submit  an  explanation  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  Manager of  his  inability  to  return  before  the  expiry  of  the  leave.  I  am  referred  to  an  un- reported  judgement  of  the  Supreme  Court  in  Civil  Appeal  No.  549  oj;  1987-  That "vas  a  case  which  arose  out  of  an  application  of  a  workman  filed  under  section  33A of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1L'47, complaining  that  the  termination  of  his  service pending  the  industrial  dispute  was  improper-  It  was  held—
"Where,  therefore,  a  standing  order  provides  that  a  workman  would  lose his  lien  on  his  appointment,  if  he  does  not  join  his  duty  within  certain time  after  his  leave  expires,  it  can  only  mean  that  his  service  stands automatically  terminated  when  the  contingency  happens".
But  the  certified  standing  orders  relevant  to  that  case  or  S.O.  (1)  in  Sec  G- of  the  certified  standing  orders  which  were  inteipreted  by  his  Lordshio  tor arriving  at  the  conclusion  referred  to  above,  are  not  produced  before  me.  SO-  (1) 'in  Sec  G-  of  the  standing  orders  is  not  extracted  in  the  judgement  either.  It  is significant  to  note  that  before  arriving  at  the  conclusion  his  Lordship  himself  had observed,  "the  standing  order  is  inartistically  worded".  The  relevant  portion  of clause  9  of  the  Certified  Standing  Orders  in  the  instant  case  is—
"If  the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally granted  or  subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appoint- ment  unless"  etc-,
In  view  of  this  wording  the  interpretation  does  not  appeal  to  me  that  when the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally  granted  or subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appointment  automatically. ' There  are  two  more  conditions  to  be  satisfied  before  the  absentee  employee lose=  his  lien,  namely,  his  returning  within  8  days  and  submitting  an  explana- t i o n^  the  satisfaction  of  te  Manager  a b f'  V =  ••r.h:V  V  return  before  the expiry  of  the  leave.  It  is  manifest  that  .  •'  •  • ' , - : ••  applies  his  mind a nd  find  t he  e x p l a n a t i on  o f f e r ed  as  n ot
. - : .-  • • • r . - . - . i - .y  ! ' - <>  T :I  of  t he  a b s e n t ee
emolovee  cannot  be  lost.  It  also  follows  that  to  satisfy  the  Manager  the,absentee employee  should  have  an  opportunity  to  place  the  necessary  material,  m  other- words  evidence,  in  support  of  his  explanation.  Thus,  the  management  cannot terminate  the  lien  of  the  absentee  employee  on  his  perm: place  his  name  on  the  badli  list  without  giving  him  an and  to  produce  evidence  in  support  of  the  explanation.  No  such  opportunity  -was •siven  to  the  affected  workman  in  the  present  case-  Consequently  the  order  of the  employers  dated  20/21st  November,  1964,  Ext.  M3  cannot  stand.
8  I,  therefore,  hold  that  the  management  of  Digwadih  Colliery  of  M/s.  Tata Iron  and  Steel  Company  Limited,  P.  O. Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad  were  not  justified in  striking  off  from  the  rolls,  the  lien  of  the  affected  workman,  Ram  Autar, miner,  16  seam  Ticket  Number  3211  with  effect  from  20/21st  November,  1964, and,  consequently,  I  direct  that  he  be  reinstated  to  his  permanent  appointment with  effect  from  20/21st  November,  1P64  and  be  paid  all  his  wages  and  dues,  it anv,  as  though  the  lien  on  h^  . - - - . — t - - -'  .-•  a  miner  of  the  colliery  wasnever terminated.  The  award  is  • • • • •.  and  submitted  under  section  15 ef  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.

SBC.  3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KART1KA  27,  1889  4379
APPENDIX  I
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  NO.  82  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers in  relation  to the Dicv.adih  Coll;ery  of M s.  Taia  Iron  & Steel Com- pi-i-.y,  Jamadoba.  P.  O.  Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their Workmen
List  of Documents Admitted  in Evidence for  the Employers
Proved  by Description  of documents and  date
Distinguishing mark or number
Date of admission
Whether admitted or proved
Ext.  Mi
Admitted
Original leave  application  clt.  17-10-64 12-9-67
of  Shri  Ramautar,  Miner,  T.  No
32411.
Ext. M2
Do.
Do.
Original  telegram  dr.  I 3 - IT- 54  from Ramautar  addressed  to  "Semi Saheb,  Tata  Iron  Office."
Do.
Do.
"Ext.M3
Copy  of  letter  No.  Dig/15-64/6147 dt.  20/21-11-64  addressed  to  Sri Ramautar.
Do.
Copy  of  th*  certified  standing  orders
Ext.M4
21-9-67
List  of Djcummts  Admitted in evidence for  Workmen
Proved by
Dt. of
Description  of document and  date
Distinguishing mark or number
admission
Whether admitted or proved
W Wi Ext.  Wi
Proved
12-9-67
Extract  of  the  membership  register 1961-63  relate  to  Sri  Ramautar  (SI. No. 107).
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO, Presiding  Officer,
Central  Government  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal  at
Dhanbad.
APPENDIX  II
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  NO-  82  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers in  relation  to the Digwadih  Colliery  of M/s. Tata  Iron &  Steel  Com- pany,  Jamadoba,  P.  O.  Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their Workmen
List  of Witnesses Examined for  the Employers
No. of witness
Name of the witness
Date  of  examination
Nil.
Nil.
Nil.

L*  '••
List  of Witnesses Examined for  the Workmen
No. of witness
Name of ihc  witness
Date  of examination
Wl
Ram  Mitra
12-9-1967.
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer,
Central Govt. Additional Industrial Tribunal at Dhanbad.
[No.  2/111/65-LRII.l
S.O.  4103.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947 (14  of  1M7),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of tjie  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Jitpur  Colliery  of  Messrs  Indian  Iron  and  Sted Company  (Limited,  Post  Office  Bhaga,  District  Dhanbad  and  their  workmen, which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  oa  the  31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes Act.  1*47
REFERENCE  N0,  g2  OF  1967
PARTIES  :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Jitpur  Colliery  of  Messrs  Indian  Iron  and  Steel Company  Limited,  Post  Office,  Bhaga,  District,  Dhanbad. AND
Their  Wormen.
PRESENT:
Sliri  Nandagiri  VenKata  Rao—Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES :
FOT  the  Employers— Shri  R.  K-  Prasad,  Manager. For the  Workmen—Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress.
STATE:  Bihar.
INDUSTRY:  Coal.
Dhavbad,  Dated, the  2eth  October, 1967
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Jitpur  Colliery  of  Messrs  Indian  Iron and  Steel  Company  Limited,  Post  Office  Bhaga.  District  Dhanbad  and  their workmen  by  its  order  No.  2/30/65-LRH,  dated  8th  August,  1965, referred  to  the Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947,  for  adjudication  the  dispute  in  respect  of  the  mat- ters  specified  in  the  schedule  annexed  thereLo.  The  schedule  is  extracted  below:
"SCHEDULE
Whether  the  management  of  the  Jitpur  Colliery  of  Messrs  Indian  Iron  and Steel  Company  Limited  was  justified  in  terminating  the  lien  of  bhn Jalaluddin  on  the  post  of  Miner,  and  causing  a  break  in  his  service from  the  14th  September,  1963  to  the  6lh  October,  1963?  If  not,  to what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
2  he  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  registered  Lhe  refer- ence  as  reference  No.  12!)  of  1065  on  its  file.  The  workmen  filed  their  statement of  demands  While  it  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrial Tribunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal  by  the Central  Government  by  its  order  No.  8/25/67-LRII,  dated  8th  May,  1967.  under section  33(B)(1)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.  Consequently  lhe  refer- ence  is  renumbered  on  the  file  of  this  tribunal  as  reference  No.  62  of  1967- The  employers  also  filed  their  statement  of  demands.

SEC.  3(ii)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4381
3,  The  affected  workman,  Jalaluddin  (herein-after  referred  to  as  the  affected workman)  is  a  miner  in  the  colliery  of  the  employers  since  some  years.  He applied  i'or  leave  for  18  days  and  the  siime  was  granted  with  effect  from  5th August,  1963.  On  26th  August,  15363,  he  applied  lor  extension  of  leave  by  two weeks  pleading  illness  and  the  extension  also  was  granted.  But,  without  apply- ing  for  further  extension  he  stayed  away  and  reported  to  duty  on  7th  October, 1963.  nlong  with  a  medical  certificate  from  the  Civil  AssistanL  Surgeon,  Hazari- bagh  stating  that  he  was  suffering  from  fever  with  cough  and  dysenlry  from. 25th  August,  l"63  to  4th  October,  1P<63 and  that  he  was  fit  to  resume  duty  from *7th  October,  lf)t>3.  He  was  allowed  to  resume  duty  on  that  day  without  any objection.  By  the  chargesheet,  dated  10th  October,  1963,  alleging  lhat  he  had over-stayed  the  leave  and  extension  granted  by  24  days  he  was  called  upon  to explain  why  disciplinary  action  should  not  be  taken  against  him.  Tie  submitted liis  explanation  on  14th  October,  1963,  repeating  the  above  facts  and  pleading that  there  was  no  question  of  overstaying.  These  facts  are  not  in  dispute,  The case  oi  the  workmen  is  that  on  receipt  of  the; explanation  of  the  affected  workman, on  14th  October,  1963,  the  management  .did  not  proceed  further  but  kept  silent, lhat  under  un-foresccn  circumstances  tbv>  affected  workman  again  approached the  management  on  20th  November,  1963,  for  sanction  of  a  fresh  leave  when  the Assistant  Labour  Officer  of  the'colliery  told  him  verbally  that  since  he  had  been ro-employed  as  a  miner  he  was  not  entitled  to  the  leave  applied  for,  that  he promptly  brought  the  fact  to  the  notice  of  the  Itfanagfr,  that  in  order  to  cover  up irregularity  the  Manager  through  his  letter,  dated  22nd  November,  1963,  inform- ed  him  that  the  lien  of  his  service  was  broken  as  he  had  overstayed  the  granted and  extended  leave  and  that,  as  such,  the  management  had  violated  the  spirit embedded  in  labour  laws  and  have  denied  natural  justice  to  the  affected  work- man  by  not  offering  him  chance  to  defend  himself  before  an  enquiry.  The  stand taken  by  the  employers  is  that  when  he  applied  for  the  extension  of  leave  by two  weeks  the  affected  workman  did  not  enclose  any  medical  certificate,  that after  expiry  of  the  extended  leave  he  did  not  apply  for  any  further  extension  and Overstayed  the  granted  and  extended  leave  for  no  valid  reason,  that  the  medical certificate  produced  by  him  was:  not  considered  satisfactory  evidence  of  his illness,  that  full  enquiry  was  held  into  the  charge  and  he  was  given  every  oppor- tunity  to  defend  himself,  that  in  the  enquiry  he  was  found  guilty  of  violating clause  11  of  the  standing  order,  that  the  lien  on  his  appointment  was  terminated as  provided  under  the  standing  orders,  that,  however,  he  was  allowed  to  join  in his  own  place  instead  of  bein£  put  as  badli  miner  and  that,  as  such,  the  action of  the  management  was  justified.  The  employers  also  pleaded  that  the  union representing  the  majority  of  the  workmen  of  the  colliery  and  its  espousal  of  the cause  of  the  affected  workman  was  colourable  exercise  of  its  right  and  that  the industrial  dispute  alleged  was  artificial  and  did  not  exist.
4.  The  workmen  were  represented  by  Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan Mazdoor  Congress  and  the  employers  by  Shri  R.  K.  Prasad,  Man.  ,fer,  By  con- sent  of  the  employers  Exts,  Wl  and  W2  Urcre  marked  for  the  workmen  and  by consent  of  the  workmen  Exts.  Ml  to  M5  were  marked  for  the  employers.  On tehalf  of  the  workmen  two  witnesses  were  examined  and  on  behalf  of  the employerrs  only  one  witness  was  examined  and  Exts.  M6,  M7,  M8,  M9  and  M9(a) were  marked.  The  Secretary  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  examined  himself  as "WW1.  It  is  in  his  evidence  that  the  affected  workman  was  a  member  of  the branch  union  of  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  since  before  the  industrial  dispute  in respect,  of  the  subject  matter  of  reference  was  raised  and  that  at  that  time  the "branch  consisted  of  37ft  members,  inclusive  of  the  affected  workman,  of  the "branch.  He  gave  his  evidence  along  with  the  membership  register.  There  was no  rebuttal  evidence.  Consequently.  I  find  no  substance  in  the  objection  raised "by  the  employers  against  the  dispute  under  reference  being  properly  espoused.
 
5.  It  is  not  in  dispute  that  the  affected  workman  had  overstayed  his  granted and  extended  leave  and  reported  for  duty  on  7th  October,  1963.  The  plea  taken by  the  employers  is  that  in  respect  of  the  overstay  of  the  affected  workman  there was  proper  enquiry  and  as  a  result  of  it  his  lien  on  a  permanent  post  of  a  miner was  terminated  and  the  break  was  caused  in  his  service.  The  only  question  for consideration  is  whether  there  was  the  departmental  enquiry  pleaded  by  the employers  and  whether  it  was  in  accordance  with  the  principles  of  natural  tus- tice.  For  this  the  attending  circumstances  are  important  to  be  kept  in  view. When  the  affected  workman  reported  to  duty  on  7th  October,  1963,  along  with the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  M3  by  a  Civil  Assistant  Surgeon,  Hazaribagh,  the employers  did  not  raise  any  objection  and  permitted  him  to  resume  duty.  The chargesheet,  Ext.  M2 was  prepared  on  10th  October,  19S3 and  served  on  the  affect- ed  workman  on  11th  October,  1963.  The  explanation  submitted  by  the  affected workman  on  14th  October,  1963  to  the  charge  was  that  he  was  ill  during  the alleged  period  of  overstay.  The  alleged  departmental  enquiry  was  conducted

4382  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARJlltA  27, 16?9  [PART ,11-
by  Kalyan  Kumar  Paul,  Welfare  Officer,  who  is  examined  as  MW1.  He  says that  under  orders  of  the  Manager  he  conducted  the  enquiry.  But  no  such  order is  produced.  MW1  concedes  in  categorical  terms  that  no  notice  in  writing  was given  to  the  affected  workman  regarding  the  time  and  place  of  the  enquiry. However,  he  adds  that  the  affectecT  workman  was  informed  orally  through  the Assistant  Labour  Officer  and  for  this  he  has  proved  the  entry  Ext.  M9(a)  as  in the  hand-writing  of  the  Asstt.  Labour  Officer.  The  entry  reads,  "PI.  inform  the following  to  report  to  W.O.  for  enquiry  of  CH/£>heets  on  the  date  mentioned below;—
1 2 3 4.  Jalaluddin  \  lS-x-64
Miner  16 A /  7-30  A.M."
I  have  extracted  the  entry  to  show  that  it  docs  not  show  that  the  affected  work- man  was  actually  informed  about  the  enquiry  and  the  entry  of  the  Asstt.  Labour Officer  only  directs  some  one  to  convey  the  information  to  the  affected  workman. There  is  no  evidence  that  the  information  was  conveyed  accordingly.  The  entry does  not  show; the  signature  or  L.T.I,  of  the  affected  workman  In  token  of  having received  the  information.  The  Asstt,  Labour  Officer  or  the  person  who  actually conveyed  the  information  to  the  affected  workman  is  not  examined.  The  enquiry report  is  Ext.  M6  and  it  is  dated  21st  October,  1E63.  The  enquiry  officer,  MW1 says  that  he  had  recorded  the  statement  of  the  affected  workman  during  the enquiry  and  proved  it  as  Ext.  M7.  Neither  the  statement,  Ext.  M7  nor  the report  Ext.  M6  shows  that  the  affected  workman  was  given  an  opportunity  to lead  his  defence  evidence.  It  must  be  remembered  that  when  the  affected  work- man  reported  to  duty  on  7th  October,  1963.  he  had  produced,  admittedly,  the medical  certificate,  Ext.  M3  given  by  the  Civil  Asstt.  Surgeon,  Hazaribagh  stating therein  that  the  affected  workman  was  suffering  from  fever  with  cough  and dysentery  and  was  under  his  treatment  from  25th  August,  1<>03  to  4th  October, 1963.  The  explanation  submitted  by  the  affected  workman  to  the  charge  was that  during  the  alleged  period  of  overstay  he  was  lying  ill.  To  the  specific question  of  the  enquiry  officer  as  to  why  he  overstayed  the  extended  leave,  the affected  workman  had  answered  that  he  had  remained  ill  even  after  his  exten- sion  period  and  was  not  in  a  position  to  send  further  extension  letter.  It  is  mani- fest  that  if  he  was  given  an  opportunity  he  would  have  examined  in  his  defence the  Civil  Asstt,  Surgeon  to  speak;  about  the  nature  of  his  illness  during  the material  period.  Without  giving  such  opportunity  the  enquiry  officer  jumped at  the  conclusion  that  the  medical  certificate,  Ext.  M3  appeared  to  him  made  to order.  Although  the  enquiry  report  was  submitted  on  21st  October,  1963,  the order  of  the  Manager  directing  the  break  of  service  cf  the  affected  workman appears  to  have  been  passed  on  22nd  November,  1963,  Ext.  Ml.  There  is  abso- lutely  no  attempt  made  on  behalf  of  the  employers  to  explain  this  inordinate delay.  The  workmen  have  an  explanation,  which  is  that  there  waj  no  enquiry at  all  in  respect  of  the  chargesheel,  Ext.  M2,  that  when  on  20th  November,  1963\ the  affected  workman  applied  for  fresh  leave,  the  Manager  seryed  the  letter, Ext,  Ml  on  the  affected  workman  informing  him  that  the  lien  on  his  service  was broken  and  that  the  enquiry  report  and  the  belated  endorsement  on  the  charge- sheet,  Ext.  M2  were  manipulated.  The  affected  workman,  WW2  also  has  deposed that  there  was  no  enquiry  in  respect  of  the  chargesheet,  Ext.  M2.  He  further deposed  that  when  he  came  to  know  that  there  occurred  a  break  in  his  service he  submitted  an  application  to  the  Manager.  The  application  was  drafted  by  a clerk  in  the  colliery  by  name  Banerjee.  It  is  dated  20th  November,  1963.  It nays  that  when  he  went  to  take  leave  from  the  Asstt.  Labour  Officer  he  was Informed  verbally  on  20th  November,  1963  that  he  had  been  taken  as  a  tempo- rary  hand.  The  affected  workman  expressed  his  surprise  at  the  information,  as no  order  to  that  effect  was  served  on  him  at  any  time  before,  A3  a  matter  of fact  also  there  is  no  material  brought  on  record  to  show  that  the  order  of  the Manager,  dated  12th  November,  1963  was  conveyed  to  the  affected  workman  at any  time  before  22nd  November,  1963,  Ext.  Ml.  In  view  of  this  material  the explanation  offered  by  the  workman  appeals  to  me  and  appears  to  me  highly probable.  As  a  result  of  the  cumulative  effect  of  all  the  above  circumstances  I nold  that  the  departmental  enquiry  pleaded  by  the  employers  cannot  be  relied upon  and  it  is  pressed  into  service  after  20th  November,  1&63, when  the  affected workman  approached  the  Asstt.  Labour  Officer  for  further  leave.
 
6.  I,  therefore,  find  that  the  management  of  the  Jitpur  Colliery  of  M/s.  Indian Iron  and  §teel  Co.  Ltd.,  was  not  justified  in  terminating  the  Hen  of  the  affected workman,  Jalaluddin  on  the  post  of  miner,  and  causing  break  in  his  service  from

Sic.  I(H)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARtIKA  27. 1889  4385
the  14th  September,  1963  to  the  8th  October,  1963  and  set  aside  the  order,  Ext. Ml  causing  the  above  break  in  the  service.  I  further  direct  that  the  affected workman  be  treated  as  in  continuous  service  from  the  14th  September,  1963  to the  6th  October,  1963  in  his  original  post  of  a  miner  and  be  paid  his  wages  and other  emoluments  due  to  him  for  the  period  as  though  the  break  never  occurred. The  award  is  made  accordingly  and  submitted  under  section  15  of  the  Industrial Disputes  Act.  1947.
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer
APPENDIX  I
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  NO-  62  OF  1967
PARTIES  :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Jitpur  Colliery  fof  Messrs  Indian  Iron  &  Steel  Company Limited,* Posr  Office  Bhaga, Distt.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen
List  of  Documents admitted  in  evidence for  the  Employers
Description  of document & date
Proved by Distinguishing mark or number
Date of admission
Wlvthcr admit u-d or  prov:d
22-S-(i7
Kxt.  Mi
L.Ticr  N'i.  ChirKo  63/2H4/A  dt.
Admitted
22-11-63,
D o.
Do.
Do.
3xt.  M2 Ext.  M3
Charge Sheet No. 284 M'-'dical  certificate  from  A.  K.  Bhatic- Do.
char jce.
Do.
Ext. M4
Do.
Leiier  dt.  26-8-63  from  Jalaluddin  to
Do.
Do.
Manager. Standing order
Ext. MS
Proved M Wi Do.
Do. Do.
Do.
Do.
Enquiry report dt.  21-10-63 linquiry proceeding: dt.  19-10-63 Statement  showing  overstay from  i960
Ext. M6 Ext. M7 Ext. M8
Do.
Do.
to 1962.
Do.
Do.
Ext. M9
Do.
Do.
Book  iu  which  Assn.  Labour  Officer used to maintain  and  give direction to  el--k  to  inform  person  concerned time  and  place  of  domestic  enquiry. Hntry  "R. C.  16A"  in  the above  book.
Do.
Ext, M9(aj
D".
List  of  Documents admitted  in  evidence for  the  workmen
Dl. of
Description  of document & date
Proved by Distinguishing mark or number
admission
Whether admitted or proved
lixt. W 1
Copy  of  the  chargeshect  No.  284  dt.
Admitted
22-8-67
10-10-63 to  Jalaluddin.
Letter  dr.  22-TT-63  from  Manager  to
Hxt, W2
Do.
Do.
Jalaluddin.
(Sd.)  N-  VJSNKATA  RAO.
Presiding  Officer, Central  Govt.  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal..

43S4  T HE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  I88D  [PA*T  I I-
APPENDIX  II
BEFORH  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  No.  62  OF  T967,
PARTIES:
Employers  in  rclalion  ro  the  Jiipur  Colliery  of  Messrs  Indian  Iron  &  S'*d  Company Limited,  Post  Office;  :  Bharjn,  District,  Dhunhad.
AND
Their  Workmen
List  of  witnesses exvninii  for  th* employer':
No.  of witness
Name  of the witness
Date  of  examination
Kalynn  Kumar  Paul
22-8-67.
M Wi
List  uf witnesses examined for the workmen
No.  of witness
Name  of the witness
Date  of  examination
WW2
Prasanta  Burnian Jalaluddin
22-8-1967 22-8-T967
(Sd.)  N-  VENKATA  KAO, Presiding  OfBcer,
Central  Government  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal
at  Dhanbad.
[No.  2/30/65-LRII.]
New  Delhi,  the  8th  November  1967
S.O.  4104.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  .the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (It of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Additional  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  tho emp'oyers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery  (Post  Office  Bhowra,  District  Dhan- bad).  and  their  workmen,  which  waa  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the 31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD.
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Dis-
putes  Act,  1947
REFERENCE  NO.  46  OF  1967
PARTIES:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,  Post  Office  Bhowra,  District Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen
PRESENT:
Shri  NandaKiri  Venkata  Rao.—Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES:
For  the  Employers.—Shri  K.  C.  Nandkeolyar,  Deputy  Chief  Personnel Officer.
For  the  Workmen.—Shri  Prasanta  Burman.  Secretary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Con- gress.

JFc.  3(ii)]  '1)1,'  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  '11, 1A89  4385
STATE:  Bihar,  •
INDOGTRY:  Coal.
Dhanbad.  dated,  the  25th  October,  1967
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  rpininn  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  1 elation  to  tht?  Bbowra  Colliery.  Post  Office  Bhowra, District  Dhanbad  and  their  workmen,  by  its  order  No.  2/]39/64-LBH  dated  27th May,  1965,  referred  to  the  Central  Government  Industr-iil  Tribunal.  Dhanba'd under  section  10fl)(d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.  for  adjudication  th" dispute  in  respect  of  the  matters  specified  in  the  schedule  i:inexed  therefore-  The schedule  is  extracted  below: —
SCHEDULE
"Whether  the  management  01 the  Bhowra  Colliery  was  justified  in  termina- ting,  with  effect  from  18th  June,  1964  the  services  of  Shri  Mangru Gorh,  Pick  Miner  No.  4  Pit?  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman entitled0"
2  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the reference  as  reference  No.  89  of  1885  on  Its  file.  The  workmen  filed  their  state- ment  of  demands.  While  it  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Indus- trial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the Central  Government  by  its  order  No.  8/25/G7-LRII  dated  8th  May,  1967  under Section  33 (B)  (1)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.  Consequently  the  refe- rence  is  renumbered  on  the  file  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No.  46  of  19S7.  The employers  also  filed  their  statement  of  demands.
3.  The  affected  workman,  Mangru  Gorh  (hereinafter  referred  to  as  the  affect- ed  workman)  was  a  pick  miner  of  No.  4 Pit  in  the  employers  colliery.  He  applied and  got  sanctioned  earned  leave  for  13  days  with  effect  from  30th  March,  1934 to  13th  April,  1964  and  proceeding  to  his  native  place  for  building  his  house.  He atoplied  for  extension  of  the  leave  with  effect  from  14th  April,  1964  to  18th  May, 1964  through  his  letter  dated  13th  April,  3964  sent  by  registered  post  under  regis- tration  receipt  No.  56  dated  13th  April,  1964.  The  extension  sought  for  was granted.  Thus,  he  was  due  to  join  duty  on  19th  May,  1964.  But  he  reported  to duty  on  17th  June,  1964.  Thereupon  the  Manager  gave  him  the  letter  on  the  very day  to  explain  why  disciplinary  action  should  not  be  taken  against  him  for  his overstaying  the  leave  by  such  a  long  time.  On  the  very  reverse  of  the  letler Nawal  Klshore  Lai,  Assistant  Secretary  of  the  Bhowra  Branch  of  Colliery  Maz- door  Sangh  wrote  the  explanation  on  behalf  of  the  affected  workman  that  he  could not  attend  to  duty  in  time  due  to  building  of  His  house  and  praying  to  be  aPowed to  join  duty,  On  this  the  Labour  .Welfare  Officer  commented  that  the  affected Workman  was  coming  after  two  months  of  expiry  of  leave.  The  Manager  ordered •on it  that  the  affected  workman  lost  his  lien  on  service.  Accordingly,  a  letter  was issued  to  the  affected  workman  under  the  signature  of  the  Manager  dated  18th June,  1064,  informing  him  that  he  had  lost  lien  on  his  job  and  his  service  was  ter- minated  with  immediate  effect.  These  facts  are  not  in  dispute.
 
4.  The  case  of  the  workmen  Is  that  the  affected  workman  was  caught  by  sun Stroke  and  fell  ill,  that  Dr.  Kripa  Shanker  Dwevedi,  Gazipore,  under  whose  treat- ment  he  was,  sent  a  registered  letter  to  the  management,  informing  the  manage- ment  about  the  illness  of  the  aifected  workman,  that  after  he  was  cured  he  appear- ed  before  the  management  on  17th  June,  1984  with  two  certificates,  one  from  the Medical  Officer  and  another  from  the  Grampanchayat  to  prove  his  iHness,  that the  management,  Instead  of  considerating  his  case  sympathically  and  allowing him  to  resume  duty,  chargesheeted  him  on  the  same  day,  alleging  that  he  had  un- authorisedly  over-stayed  his  leave,  that  he  did  not  get  the  explanation  attributed to  him  endorsed  on  the  reverse  of  the  chargesheet  by  N.  K.  Lai,  that  he  did  not affix  his thumb  impression  under  it  and  that,  as  such,  the  termination  of  his  service with  effect  from  18th  June,  1964  was  arbitrary,  unjust  and  illegal.  It  is  further stated  that  the  affected  workman  had  been  very  active  member  of  the  Khan  Maz- door  Congress  and.  as such,  he  had  been  keeping  rivalry  with  the  Colliery  Mazdoor Sangh,  that  the  management  was  annoyed  at  the  activity  of  the  affected  workman for  the  establishment  of  a  branch  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress,  that  the  Assis- tant  Secretary  of  the  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sangh,  Bhowra  Branch  connived  with  the management  and  msde  the  false  endorsement  on  the  reverse  of  the  rhargesheet and  forged  underneath  of  the  thumb  impression  of  the  affected  workman  and that,  as  such,  the  action  taken  by  the  emp'oycrs  was  malafidc.  The  stand  taken by  the  employers  is  that  the  affected  workman  did  not  cause  any  letter  to  be  sent through  his  Medical  Attendant  for  extension  of  his  leave  beyond  18th  May,  1964, that  he  was  a  member  of.  the  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sangh,  Bhowra  of  which  N.  K-

438<5  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18, 1%7/KARTIKA  27, 188!)  [PART  I I-
Lai  was  the Asstt.  Secretary,  that  thp affected  workman  did get his explanation endorsed  by N. K. Lai on the reverse  of the chargeaheet  voluntarily  and  affixed his  thumb  impression  under  it, that  he had  produced  the  medical  certificate  after he  was  served  with  the letter  dated  18th  June,  19H4  terminating  his lien  on  his iob  and that  the action  taken  by the employers  in terminating  the lien  of  the affected  workman  on his permanent  job was  quite  in  accordance  with  standing order  No.  11 of the certified  standing  orders  of the colliery,  legal,  justified and bonafled.  The employers  have  taken  further  objection  that  the dispute  under reference  was  not an industrial  dispute  but was  an individual  depute,  inasmuch, as  the affected  workman  became  member  of the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  only after  his dismissal-
5.  The  workmen  were  represented  by Shrl  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan Mazdoor  Congress  and the employers  by Shri  K- C. Nandkeolyar,  Dy.  Chief  Per- sonnel  Officer.  By consent  of the workmen  Exts.  Ml to MH  are marked  for  the employers  and by consent  of the  employers  Ext.  Wl  was  marked  for  the  workmen. On  behalf  of the  workmen  two  witnesses  were  examined  and  Ext.  W2 was  marked. On  behalf  of the employers  also  two  witnesses  were  examined  and  Exta.  Ml (a) and  M2(a)  were  marked.
6.  The  flrst  point  in dispute  is whether  the  explanation  endorsed,  on the  reverse of  the chargeshect,  Ext.  M2 was by consent  of the affected  workman,  and  the thumb  impression  under  the  endorsement  was  affixed  by him  voluntarily.  Accord- ing to the  statement  of demands  filed by the  workman  they  were  forged  by N. K. Lai  without  the consent  or  knowledge  of the affected  workman.  The affected workman  is  examined  as WW2.  While  denying  that  the explanation  endorsed was bv  his  consent  or knowledge  or the  thumb  impression  under  it was  his, he has come  forth  with  the story  improved  upon  the statement  of demands  filed  by  the workmen  He says  that  the  char^esheet,  Ext.  M2  wa3  given  to him  on 17th  June, 1964 in the  office  ot the  Personnel  Officer,  E. M.  Lai  and  in his  presence,  that  N. K. Lai  was  also  present  and  that  when he was  coming  out  with  the  chargeshcet,  N K. Lai  asked  him  for the  r-hargesheet  and  when  he declined  to give it to him he  tooK it  from  him  forcibly-  Order  of  reference  is  accompanied  by  a  copy  of  the failure  report  of the  CoiKilintlon  Olllcor.  The  failure  report  shows  that  the airect- ed  workman  had  stated  before  the C o n c i s i on  Officer  that  he approached NK Lai  fnr writing  his explanation.  This  contradicts  the story  of N- K. Lai forcibly takinc  awav  tL  chargesheet  from  the affected  workman.  Further,  the affected workman  dld not complain  to the police  or any  person  regarding  N-  K. Lai  forci- bly  snatching  away  the chargesheet  from  him.  The  record  further  shows  that nn  20th  June  1%4 N  K- Lai recommended  to the Manafier  to allow  the affected workman  resume  his duty  as he had produced  the medical  certificate  for  the
fhP  X r ^ s h e et  requesting  him  to write  the explanation  on his behalf  that he w r o t e t hf  explanation  as instructed  by him  and  that  the L. T. I  was  affixed by
™ ± K ~5  <* MWl.  H? sjp  that hi, clert had servM (he cba£"teet
 
S t e S S j ' p e r i o d.  MWl. Badrl Praaad Tripalhl, Secretary  Kh.n Maz-mmmmmmm

>rc.  3(ii)J  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA  27,  lfcW  4387
affected  workman  himself  and  that  the  affected  workman  was  a  member  of  the Colliery  Mazdoor  Sangh  till  his  service  was  terminated  on  18th  June,  1964.
7.  The  next  point  in  dispute  is  whether  the  affected  workman  caused  a  lettei to  be  sent  by  Dr.  Kripa  Shankar  Dwevedi  of  Gazlpore  informing  the  management about  his  illness  from  17th  May,  1964.  It  appears  that  before  the  ConciliaLior*. Officer  counter-foils  of  postal  receipt  of  the  register  letter  were  produced  and  the management  stated  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  that  the  register  letter  men- tioned  in  the  receipt  was  actually  the  registered  letter  No.  56  dated  13th  April, 1964.  The  same  plea  is  taken  by  the  employers  m  the  statement  filed  before  this Tribunal.  But  the  workman  did  not  choose  to  file  any  counterfoil  of  receipt  to show  that  Dr.  Kripa  Shanker  Dwevedi  had  sent  a  registered  letter  to  the  Managei of  the  colliery  of  the  employers.  Consequently,  1 hold  that  no  letter  was  sent  on behalf  of  the  affected  workman  bv  Dr-  Krfpa  Shanker  Dwevedi,  informing  the Manager  of  the  col'iery  about  the  illness  of  the  affected  workman  from  17th  May, 1964.
.  8-  As  the  result  of  my  above  findings  the  pruve  and  admitted  case  la  reduced to  this:  The  affected  workman  proceeded  on  sanctioned  leave  for  13  days  with effect  from  30th  March,  1964  and  extended  the  leave  upto  18th  May,  1964.  The extension  sought  for  was  granted.  Thus,  the  affected  workman  was  expected  to join  duty  on  19th  May,  1964,  but  instead  he  reported  to  duty  on  17th  June,  1964. The  employers  did  not  permit  him  to  resume  duty  and  immediately  issued  a letter  calling  upon  him  to  explain  why  disciplinary  action  should  not  be  taken against  him  for  unauthorisedly  overstaying  the  leave.  The  affected  workman submitted  the  explanation  that  he  could  not  join  duty  earlier  as  he  was  building his  house.  This  explanation  did  not  find  favour  with  the  employers  and,  conse- quently,  they  torminal,ed  his  se~viro  with  effect  from  18th  June,  1964.  iris  plea- that  he  was  suddenly  taken  ill  from  17th  May,  1964  and  the  medical  certificate have  no  truth  in  them  and  they  are  pressed  into  service  after  his  service  was terminated  on  18th  June,  1964.  The  standing  order  No.  11  of  the  certified  stand- ing  orders  of  the  employers  colliery  says  uiat  if  the  employee  remains  absent beyond  the  period  of  leave  uiiginally  granted  or  subsequently  extended  he  shall loose  his  lien  on  his  appointment,  unless  he  reports  within  8  days  of  the  expiry  of the  Irave.  and  gives  an  explanation  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  Manager  of  his  in- abilitv  to  return  before  the  expiry  of  leave.  In  the  instant  case  the  affected  work- man  overstayed  his  leave  from  18th  May  •  1964  to  17  June,  1964,  which  is  a period  i.ir  hryond  8  days  of  the  exoiry  of  the  extended  leave  and  the  explanation offered  by  him,  namely,  that  he  was  engaged  in  building  his  house,  did  not  satisfy the  Manager.  Hence,  termination  of  his  Hen  on  his  permanent  job  was  quite in  accordance  with  the  standing  order  No.  11.  It  is  strancously  argued  on  behalf of  the  workmen  that  no  departmental  enquiry  was  properly  made  against  the affected  workman  giving  him  an  opportunity  to  defend  himself  etc. I  do  not  tinder- stand  what  more  disciplinary  action  was  required  in  the  present  case.  When the  affected  workman  returned  to  join  duty  on  17th  June,  1964  having  overstayed his  extended  leave  from  18th  May,  1964,  the  management  did  not  terminate  his lien  on  his  appointment  forthwith,  but  issued  him  the  letter  Ext.  M2  offering him  an  opportunity  to  explain  why  disciplinary  action  should  not  be  taken  against him.  So,  the  affected  workman  had  an  opportunity  to  explain  his  overstay  of  the extended  leave.  His  explanation  was  that  he  was  building  his  house.  The  manage- ment  did  not  disbelieve  his  explanation  and  as  such  the  management examining  prosecution  witnesses  and  the  affected  workman  cross  examin- ing  them  and  leading  his  defence  witnesses  could  not  arise.  If  the  fact  of  hi* being  engaged  in  building  his  house  was  denied  by  the  Manager;  such  a  procedure would  have  been  necessary.  The  management  simply  did  not  consider  the  ex- planation  satisfactory.  Consequently,  the  justification  of  the  -iction  taken  bv  the management  in  accordance  with  the  standing  order  No.  11  cannot  be  questioned. I  have  to  state  for  the  sake  of  clarification  that  under  the  standing  order  No.  11 the  management  could  terminate  the  lien  of  the  affected  workman  on  his  appoint- ment  as  a  pick  miner  and  place  him  on  the  badli  list-  Thus,  the  order  of  the management  dated  18th  June,  1964  should  be  understood  accordingly.
9.  I,  therefore,  find  that  the  management  of  the  Bhowra  Colliery  was  justi- fied  in  terminating  with  effect  from  18th  June,  1964  the  service  of  the  affected workman,  Shri  ManjJru  Gorh,  Pick  Miner  No.  4  Pit  Find  placing  him  on  the  badli list,  and,  consequently,  he  is  not  entitled  to  any  relief,  The  award  is  made accordingly  and  submitted  under  section  15 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.

4388  T HE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  19H7/KARTIKA  27,  1889  [PARI  H-
Al'PENDIX  I
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DIIANBAD.
REFERENCE  NO-  46  OF  1967
PARTIES:
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhown  Colliery,  Post  Ofice  : Bhovvra,  Dist.  Dhanbad
AND
Their  Workmen.
Liit  of  documents admitted  in  evidence for  employer;
Distinguishm;;
Description  of  document  and date.
Proved  bj
Whether mark or
Date of admission
number
admitted or proved
Copy of the leave application  for  extension
Ext. M  i
21-8-64 Admitted
•• (Annexure 'A')
M W i.
M  m
21-8-64 Do.
Proved Admitted Postal Envelope Copy  of the  explanation  letter dt.  17-6-64 Reply  of the  explanation  on  the  back  side  of th<
Ext. M  i  (a) Ext. M 2 Ext. M  2 (a)
original explanation letter
MW  1.
Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.
Proved Admitted Do. Do. Do.
Ext. M  i Ext. M  4 Ext. M  s Ext. M  6
Letter  of termination Copy of the  medical  certificate Failure  report Copy of the  certified  standing  order
List  of documents  admitted  in evidence for workmen
Description  of document  & date
Distinguishing
Proved by.
Date of admission.
Whether ,  admitted mark  or number.
or  proved
21-8-67 Do.
Ext.  Wi Ext. W2
Printed  standing  order Extract  of Membership  register
Admitted. Proved. W Wi
(Sd)  N-  VBNKATA  R'AO,
Presiding  Officer,
Central  Govt.  Additional  Industrial
Tribunal  at  Dhanbad,
APPENDIX  II
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL AT  DHANBAD.
REFERENCE  NO-  46  OF  1967
PARTIES  : Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,  Post  Office  :  Bhowra,  District  :  Dhanbad
AND
Their  Workmen.
List  of  witnesses  examined  for  the employers
Date  of examination
Name of the  witness
No. of witness
MW  1          B.  M.  Lai                                                 21-8-1967.
MW  2          Nawal Kishore  Lai                                           2l-K-iy67-


,  •  ,  .  , . ' • ••  io.  i  .  i w/,  i  '  4H 9'
LIST  OF  WITNESSES  EXAMINED  FOR  THE  WORKMEN
No.  of witness Name  of the witness
Date of  examination
Badri Prasad  Tripathi Mangroo Gourh
21-8-67 21-8-S7
(§3.)  N-  VENKATA  HAO, Presiding  Officer,
Central Govt. Additional Industrial  Tribunal
at Dhanbad.
[No.  2/139/64-LRJU
SO-  4195,—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14) of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Industrial  Tribunal,  Jabalpur,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers  in ralation  to  the  Chhota  Bowa  Colliery,  Post  Office  Bansjora,  District  Dhanbact (Managing  contractors  Messrs  Prabhulal  U.  Ojha  and  Company),  and  their  work- men,  which  was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October.,  19f}7.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL,  GOVT.  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT,  JABALPUR Dated  October  21,  1867
PRESENT:
Shri  G.  C.  Agarwala,  Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  CASE  NO.  92/64  (DHANBAD  TRIBUNAL)
REFERENCE  NO.  CGIT/LC(R)  (20)/67  (JABALPUR  TRIBUNAL)
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Chhota  Bowa  Colliery,  P.O-  Bansjora,  DIstt.
Dhanbad,
Versus
Their  workmen  through  the  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh,  Bihar,  P.O.  Jealgora, Distt.  Dhanbad.
APPEARANCES:
For  employers—Sri  S.  S.  Mukerji,  Advocate. For  workmen—Sri  B.  N.  Sharma,  President
AWARD
The  Ministry  of  Labour  and  Employment,  by  Notification  No.  2/65/64-LK.II dated  11th  August  1964  referred  the  following  dispute  as  staled  in  the  schedule to  the  order  of  reference  to  the  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhan- bad  from  where  it  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal  by  Notification  No.  25/67-LRII, dated  25th  April,  1967.
Matter  of  Dispute
1.  Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  the  Chhota  Bowa  Colliery  in retrenching  Sri  Moonji  Pandey,  Office  Peon,  from  service  with  effect from  the  1st  May,  1964  was  justified? 2.  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?
 
It  appears  that  Chhota  Bowa  Colliery  P.O-  Bansjora  is  under  the  management of  a  contractor  and  M/s  Prabhulal  U.  O.iha  & Co.  are  the  managing  contractors who  are  arrayed  as  employers  No.  2.  The  manager  of  the  colliery  is  employer No.  1.  The  sponsoring  Union  is  Congress  Mazdoor  Santfh.  This  Union  filed  a statement  of  claim  before  the  Dhanbad  Tribunal  on  9th  November  1964.  For  the employers,  the  statement  of  claim  was  filed  by  the  Managing  Partner  on  19th June  ±965'during  the  pendency  of  the  proceedings  before  Dhanbad  Tribunal.  An authorisation  by  the  workman-  concerned,  Shri  Moonii  Pandey,  was  also  received by  the  said  Tribunal  in  favour  of  another  Union,  Mines  Mazdoor  Union.  After the  proceedings  were  transferred  to  this  Tribunal  and  usual  notices  were  issued,

a  petition  purported  to  have  been  arrived  at  as  compromise  between  managing contractors  and  Mine  Mazdoor  Union  was  received  and  notice  of  the  same  was sent  to  the  employers  and  the  sponsoring  Union,  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh.  The President  of  the  Union,  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh,  appeared  on  next  date  and opposed  the  compromise  petition.  On  perusal,  it  was  found  to  relate  to  some other  case  and  was  rejected,  Another  petition  of  compromise  between  Mine Mazdoor  Union  and  the  employers  was  received  much  later  on  4th  July  1967  and notice  of  which  was  again  given  to  the  sponsoring  union,  Congress  Mazdoor Sangh.  Both  the  workman  concerned,  S.I  Moonji  Pandey,  anrl  the  Union,  Con- gress  Mazdoor  Sangh  have  opposed  the  petition  and  Moonji  J'andey  in  his  evi- dence  has  stated  that  he  did  not  authorise  the  Mine  Mazdoor  Union  io  cm-pro- mise  the  dispute.  Under  the  terms  of  the  compromise  petition,  which  has  been filed  by  the  employers  as  Ex.  E.  3,  Moonji  Pandey  is  to  rToive  an  cxgratia  pay- ment  of  Rs.  1001/-  in  settlement  of  his  claim,  This  compromise  petition  cannot be  accepted  for  the  simple  reason  that  the  employers  ha^e  chosen  to  enter  into a  compromise  with  the  Union  which  did  not  sponsor  the  dispute  and  has  not  been accepted  by  the  workman  concerned,  Moonji  Pandey-  He  has  stated  that  when the  management  implicated  him  falsely  in  a  criminal  case,  Sri  I.  H,  Khan  of  the Mine  Mazdoor  Union  helped  him  when  he  was  sent  to  jail  and  he  may  have  ob- tained  his  signature  for  authorisation.  He  never  authorised  him  to  compromise the  dispute.  Sri  I,  H.  Khan  had  not  appeared  either  before  the  Dhanbad  Tri- bunal  or  before  this  Tribunal  to  justify  authorisation  in  his  favour  and  at  any rate  to  state  about  the  so-called  compromise  petition.  For  all  these  reasons,  this compromise  petition  of  the  employers  with  the  Mines  Mazdoor  Union  must  be rejected  as  unauthorised  and  invalid.
As  to  the  dispute,  the  employers  have  raised  a  preliminary  objection  that  the dispute  is  not  an  industrial  dispute  and  the  Tribunal  has  no  jurisdiction.  The plea  is  clearly  untenable.  No  such  plea  wag  raised  in  the  conciliation  proceedings as  will  appear  from  the  conciliation  report  appmied  with  the  order  or  reference. The  burden  of  proving  that  the  dispute  was  not  an  industrial  dispute  lay  on  the employers,  which  they  have  failed  to  discharge.  Sri  Moonji  Panc'cy  came  in evidence  and  stated  that  since  he  was  responsible  in  forming  a  branch  of  the Union,  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh,  in  the  colliery  his  services  were  terminated.  He was  a  member  of  the  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh  and  was  in  possession  of  reJevent documents  and  receipts,  but  they  were  all  removed  by  the  management  when they  got  him  arrested  and  sent  to  iail.  He  filed  a  Criminal  Court  judgment  (Ex. Wl)  from  which  it  would  appear  that  the  management  got  a  case  under  seel ions 147/323  IPC  commenced  against  him  and  a  few  others  in  respect  of  an  incident alleged  to  have  taken  place  on  3rd  January  1965  and  which  was  found  to  be  false by  the  Magistrate.  The  communication  dated  18th  May  1964  (Ex.  E.I)  sent  by the  President  of  the  Union  Shri  B.  N.  Sharma  to  the  management  was  filed  by the  management  itself  as  (Ex  E.1)  and  in  which  names  of  office  bearers  of  the Union  for  the  year  1964-ti5  w^re  mentioned.  Si'i  Moonji  Pandey  is  mentioned  as one  of  the Vice-Presidents. The  cooperation  of  the  management  was  solicited  through the  communication.  It  is  manifest  that  the  activities  of  this  Union  must  have commenced  earlier  before  this  date  and  at  any  rate  before  the  ser\ >ra  of  Sri Moonji  Pandey  were  terminated.  He  must  have  been  a  member  of  the  Union  and as  stated  by  him  enlisted  members  during  this  period  and  formed  the  branch. Consequently,  the  Union  was  competent  to  sponsor  the  dispute  which  resulted  in this  reference,  The  plea,  therefore,  is  of  no  avail  and  is  overruled.
 
Coming  to  the  merits  of  the  dispute,  it  is  clear  that  the  termination  of  services of  Sri  Moonii  Pandey  by  way  of  retrenchment  was  clearly  malaflde  with  a  view to  victimise  him  for  trade  union  activities  and  to  get  rid  of  him.  He  was  an Office  Peon.  By  a  letter  dated  30th  March  1964,  (Ex,  E.2)  he  was  communicated that  as  he  was  surplus  to  the  requirement,  his  services  were  not  required  and  he was  asked  to  call  at  the  office  and  collect  final  payment.  This  was  a  termination forthwith  and  was  not  to  be  effective  on  a  future  date.  The  case  of  the  manage- ment  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  and  also  before  the  Tribunal,  however,  is  that he  was  retrenched  with  effect  from  1st  May,  1964,  a  fact  which  is  not  borne  out by  any  document  or  circumstance.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  conciliation  demand had  been  made  by  the  Union  so  early  as  10th  April  1964  and  it  was  during  conci- liation  when  the  management  took  up  a  self  chosen  future  date  for  retrenchment from  1st  May  1964,  Realising  the  weakness  of  their  plea,  they  took  up  & self contradictory  and  inconsistent  position,  obviously  after  the  demand  in  conciliation had  been  made,  by  sending  another  letter  to  Sri  Moonji  Pandey  dated  15th  April 1964,  that  he  had  been  absenting  from  3rd  April  1964  and  would  be  responsible for  consequences.  When  he  had  been  retrenched  by  earlier  communication  dated SOth  March  1964.  this  subsequent  communication  dated  15th  April  1964  remains incomprehensible  and  no  attempt  was  made  by  the  manager,  Sri  P.  K.  Sinha, (EW  1)  to  explain  this  contradictory  position.  Not  only  this,  another  commu- nication  dated  22nd  April  1964  (Ex.  E5}  was  sent  through  an  advocate  in  which

v,,j  xi.  u A i - . lU  O*  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  18,  1967/KARTIKA  27,  1889  4391
it  was  stated  that  after  the  retrenchment  notice  had  been  sent,  he  having  been found  surplus,  he  was  inciting  "Go-slow"  among  workers  and  compensation  was demanded  from  him.  This  presupposes  that  he  had  been  retrenched  earlier  thaa 1st  May,  1964 and  it  was  only  after  management  appeared  in  conciliation  that  they invented  a  day  as  1st  May  1964.  This  was  stated  in  another  notice  dated  25tk May  1964  (Ex.  E6)  again  sent  through  an  advocate  to  Moonji  Pandey  requiring him  to  vacate  the  quarter  occupied  by  him.  All  tliese  are  .''ear  indications  of  the malafides  of  the  management.  The  pretext  that  the  post  of  office  peon  liad  been abolished  wa-i  a  lame  excuse.  How  was  it  so  was  not  at  a!'  indicated  in  the notice  dated  30th  March,  1964  (Ex.  E.2)  wherein  it  was  simply  staled  that  he had  been  found  surplus.  According  to  Moonji  Pandoy  one  Eeglui  has  been  work- ing  in  his  place  as  office  peon,  a  fact  which  has  not  been  controverted  by  Sri  P.  K. Sinha,  manager,  in  his  evidence.  The  conciliation  report  shows  that  for  working as  office  peons  certain  other  persons  were  admitted  to  have  been  employed though  temporarily.  They  admittedly  did  not  comply  with  the  provisions  of Section  25F  T.D  Act  and  offered  to  pay  compensation  under  section  25F  before conciliation  officer.  Even  if  the  oost  was  abolished  and  Moonji  Pandey  was  sur- plus  which  was  not  a  fact,  since  retrenchment  had  not  been  affected  in  accord- ance  with  the  rules  and  without  complying  with  the  provisions  of  Section  25F I-D.  Act,  it  would  be  of  no  avail  and  would  not  be  treated  as  retrenchment brought  about  in  accordance  with  law.  The  whole  thing  was  malafide,  evidently to  victimise  him  for  his  audacity  to  introduce  the  activities  of  Congress  Mazdoor Sangh  in  the  Colliery.
Decision
The  result  is  that  the  management  was  not  justified  in  retrenching  Sri Moonji  Pandey  and  he  is  entitled  to  reinstatement  together  with  full  back  wages and  attendant  benefits.  The  issue  is  answered  accordingly.  The  union,  Congress Mazdoor  Sangh  will  be  entitled  to  Rs.  100/-  as  costs  of  the  proceedings.
(Sd.)  C>  C.  AGARWALA,
Presiding  Officer.
[No.  2/65/64-LR1I.J
S.O.  4106-—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act.  1947  (14 of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Additional  Industrial  Tribunal.  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  em- ployers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  and  Steel  Com- pany  Limited,  Jamadolia,  Post  Of'ce  Jealgora,  District  Dhanbad  and  their workmen,  which  was  received  by  
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD.
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  iO(l).'d)  of  tr?  Industrial  Disputes Act,  1947-
REFERENCE  NO.  61  OF  1967-
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  &  Steel Co-  Ltd.,  (Jamadoba,  P.O.  Jealgora.  District  Dhanbad).
AND
Their  Workmen.
PRESENT:
Shri  Nandagiri  Venkata  Rao—Presiding  Officer-
APPEARANCES :
For  the  Employers—Shri  S-  N.  Singh,  A.CP.  & W-O- For  the  Workmen—Shri  Pritish  Chanda,  President,  Tata  Collieries  Workers
Union,  Digwadih.
STATE:  Bihar.
INDUSTRY:  Coal.
Dhanbad,  dated, the  26th  October, 1967
AWARD
 
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron

and  Steel  Company  Limited,  Jarnadoba,  P.O.  Jealgora,  District  Dhanbad  and  their workmen,  by  its  order  No.  2/68/65-LRII  dated  4th  August  1965  referred  to  the Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  under  section  10(1)(d)  of  the Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  for  adjudication  the  dispute  in  respect  of  the  matters specified  in  the  schedule  annexed  thereto-  The  schedule  is  extracted  below;
"SCHEDULE
Whether  the  management  of  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  & •Steel  Company  Limited  were  justified  in  suspending  Shri  Brljnarayai} Singh,  C-R-O.  Labour,  for  10  days  with  eiject  from  1st  March  1965? If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
2.  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the  refer- ence  as  reference  No-  1.28  of  1965  in  its  file.  The  workmen  filed  their  statement of  demands.  While  It  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrie! Tribunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the  Central Government  by  its  ordej-  No.  8/25/67-LRII  dated  8th  May  1967  under  section  33 (I})(1)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947-  Consequently,  the  reference  is  renum- bered  on  the  file  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No.  61  of  1967.  The  employers  als<* filed  their  statement  of  demands-
3.  The  affected  workman,  Brijnarain  Singh  (hereinafter  referred  to  as  the affected  workman)  was  a  C.RO  Labour  working  in  the  employers  Digwadih  Col- liery,  For  keeping  an  unauthorised  gumty  on  the  Co.'s  land  the  management issued  a  letter  dated  25th/28th  January  1965  to  him1  directing  him  to  remove  the same.  Subsequently,  the  chargesheet  No-  40  dated  3rd/4th  February  1965  wa" "lso  issued  to  him,  alleging  against  him  misconduct  upder  clause  19(1)  of  the  Stand- ing  Orders  for  not  complying  with  the  direction  given  in  the  letter  dated  25th/ 28th  January  1965,  namely,  to  remove  the  unauthorised  gumty,  and  calling  upon him  to  show  cause  why  he  should  not  be  dismissed  from  service  or  otherwise punished-  In  the  explanation  submitted  by  him  to  the  rhargesheet  the  affected workman  denied  having  kept  any  gumty  on  Co.'s  land  and  stated  that  the  charge was  brought  against  him  with  the  motive  to  harras  and  victimise  him  BE he  was a  member  of  the  Tata  Collieries  Workers  Union,  which  the  management  did  not like.  He  flatly  denied  that  he  violated  any  lawful  and  reasonable  order  of  his superior  and  as  such,  committed  any  misconduct  under  clause  19(1)  of  the  Co.'s Standing  Orders  After  due  notice  to  the  affected  workman  the  departmental enquiry  was  held  on  17th  February  1965  in  presence  of  the  affected  workman  and giving  him  an  opportunity  to  cross  examine  the  prosecution  witnesses  and  defend himself.  During  the  enquiry  two  witnesses  were  examined  for  the  prosecution and  two  for  the  defence  in  addition  to  recording  of  the  statement  of  tne  affected workman.  On  18th  February  1905  the  report  of  the  enquiry  was  'submitted finding  the  affected  workman  guilty  of  the  misconduct  mentioned  In  the  charge- sheet."  As  the  result,  the  Manager  issued  a  letter  dated  23rd/24th  February  1965 suspending  the  affected  workman  for  10  days  as  a  punishment  with  effect  from 1st  March  1965-  These  facts  are  not  in  dispute-  The  case  of  the  workmen  is  that the  affected  workman  joined  the  Tata  Collieries  Workers  Union  and  took  active part  in  making  other  C-R-O.  Labourers  of  the  colliery  living  in  the  C-R.O.  camp members  of  the  said  union,  who  were  before  members  of  the  rival  I.N.T.UC  union which  was  favoured  by  the  management,  that  due  to  the  above  reason  the  manage- ment  became  displeased  and  annoved  with  the  affected  workman  and  that  in  pur- suance  of  the  vindictive  policy  the  management  planned  to  victimise  the  afTected workman  and  some  of  his  collefiue  members  of  the  union-  It  is  further  stated  that the  letter  of  the  management  dated  25th/28th  January  1965  was  in  fact  issued  to the  affected  workman  on  3rd  February  1965  i.e.,  on  the  date  when  the  chargesheet In  question  was  belnif  prepared,  that  the  affected  workman  replied  to  the  letter of  the  management  dated  25lh/28th  January  10fi5  on  5th  February,  ]9fi!5  denying •he  allegation  and  pleading  that  he  was  belnct  harassed  and  being  victimised,  that without  waitinB  tor  the  rerjly  from  the  affected  workman  the  management  issued the  characsh<=et  No.  40  Hated  3rd/4th  February  1965  to  him  on  the  same  day  when the  letter  dated  25th/28t.h  January  1965  was  Issued,  that  the  management  staged a  so  called  enquiry  which  was  neither  fair  nor  proper,  that  the  charge  against  the affected  workman'was  not  at  all  Droved  during  the  enquiry  and  that  the-  finding of  the  pnmiirv  officer  was  rmrver^e  aid  the  punishment  of  susnensum  of  10  days from  1st  Marcb  19"5  Imposed  upon  the  affected  workman  by  the  manntfement  on the  flndine  wn=-  absolutely  wrom'ful.  Illegal,  unlust)tied  and  malwfirle.  The sW  " Xn  by  the  emnlorpr,  Is  !Hat  the  ncilon  taken  osainrt  tti*  aff^ted.work- man  iK**ZcZr.  ]^al  .nd  j u s t e d.  The  further  obier-tinn  takj-n  by  them  is  that the  dispute  Involved  in  the  reference  was  not  an  industrial  dispute  hut  WP.S an individual  disiJUtr.

4.  The  Workmen  wera  represented  by  Shri^ Prittoh  Chanda,  President,  Tata  Col-
lieries  Workers  Union,  Digwadlh  and  the  employers  by  Shrl  S-  N-  Singh,  A.C.P.  & W.O.  By  consent  of  the  management  Exts.  Wl  to  W8  Were  marked  for  the  work- men-  On  behalf  of  the  employers  MWl  Is  examined  and  Exts.  Ml  to  M9  were marked.  On  behalf  of  the  workmen  WW1 is  examined  and  Exts.  W7  and  W8  were marked-  A  copy  of  Ext.  W8  is  retained  on  this  file  and  the  counterfoil  book  in Which  Ext-  W8 was  marked,  was  returned.  Ext.  W7 is  the  counterfoil  of  the  receipt for  subscription  paid  by  the  affected  vrorkman  on  10th  January  1964  and  Ext.  W8 Is  a1 Similar  receipt  for  the  subscription  paid  by  him  on  13th  January  1965.  The first  letter  said  to  have  been  issued  by  the  management  to  the  affected  workman alleging  misconduct  under  clause  19(1)  of  the  standing  orders,  appears  to  be  dated 25th/28th  January  1965,,  Ext,  W7  is  dated  10th  January  1964  and  Ext.  W"  13th January  196S.  These  Exts.,  are  proved  by  the  affected  workman,  WWl  and  there is  no  rebuttal  evidence.  Therefore,  it  emerges  that  long  before  the  allegation  of misconduct  was  made  against  the  affected  workman  he  was  a  member  of  the  Tata Collieries  Workers  Union,  which  sponsored  his  dispute  before  the  Conciliation Officer  and  at  subsequent  stages,  and,  as  such,  I  find  no  substance  in  the  plea  taken by  the  employers  that  the  dispute  involved  in  the  reference  la  an  Individual  dispute and  not  an  industrial  dispute.
5-  Admittedly,  the  management  issued  a  letter  dated  25th/28th  January  1965 and  subsequently  the  chargesheet  No.  40  dated  3/4th  February  196S,  Ext.  Ml.  The reply  sent  by  the  affected  workman  to  the  letter  of  the  management  dated  25th/ 28th  January  1965  is  Ext.  Wl.  The  letter  of  the  management  dated  25th/ 28th  January  1985  Is  not  produced  either  by  the  workmen  or  by  the  employers. The  chargesheet,  Ext.  Ml  states,—
"It  has  been  reported  against  you  as  under:—•
Vide  our  letter  No.  Dig./1511-65/486  dated  25tb/28th  January  1965  you were  instructed  to  remove  the  unauthorised  Gumti  kept  by  you  on Co-'s  land  but  you  have  not  done  so-
The  acts  as  above  alleged  to  have  been  committed  by  you,  amount  to serious  misconduct  under  clause  19(1)  of  the  Standing  Orders,  and
would  warrant  serious  action/your  dismissal  from  our  service. Accordingly,  you  are  hereby  required  to  show  cause  within  72  hours  of the  receipt  hereof  why  you  would  not  be  dismissed  from  service  or otherwise  punished".
 
Clause  19  of  the  Standing  Orders  provides  for  punishment  of  an  employee  for misconduct  and  sub-clause  (1)  to  (20)  of  the  clause  specify  the  acts  which  denote misconduct.  Sub-clause  (1)  lays  down  that  any  wilful  insubordination  or  disobe- dience,  whether  alone  or  in  combination  with  another  or  others,  of  any  lawful  of reasonable  order  of  a  superior,  also  is  a  misconduct  for  which  under  the  clause  the employee  concerned  can  be  suspended  fined  or  dismissed  without  notice  or  any compensation  in  lieu  of  notice.  Exts.  M3  and  M4  are  respectively  statements  of prosecution  witnesses,  Parvltiyar,  Welfare  Officer  and  B.  Lai,  Clerk  of  the  emp- loyers,  Ext,  M5  of  the  affected  workman  and  Exts.  Mfi  and  M7  are  respectively statements  of  defence  witnesses,  Mandip  and  Hari,  C-R-O-  labourers  recorded  dur- ing  the  departmental  enquiry  and  Exts.  M8  is  the  report  of  the  enquiry.  K-  N. Prasad,  the  then  Welfare  Officer  (P)  was  the  enquiry  Officer.  Exts.  M3  to  M8  are proved  by  L.  H-  Parvatiyar,  MWl,  who  was  also  a  prosecution  witness  In  the departmental  enquiry  and  whose  statement  recorded  is  Ext-  M3-  During  the  time of  the  enquiry  he  was  the  Welfare  Officer  of  Digwadih  Colliery  and  the  Personnel Officer  of  Digwadih  and  Central  Organisation-  He  has  also  proved  Exts.  Ml,  M2 and  M9.  He  has  deposed  that  the  enquiry  officer  N.  K.  Prasad  was  sick  and  not in  a  position  to  attend  the  Court-  He  has  proved  the  signatures  of  the  enquiry officer  N  K-  Prasad,  the  affected  workman  and  the  witness  concerned  on  all  the statements,  Exts.  M3, M4, M5, M6 and  M7-  He  has  also  proved  the  enquiry  report, Ext-  M8  to  be  In  the  hand  and  under  the  signature  of  the  enquiry  officer  N.  K. Prasad.  The  affected  workman  has  jiot  denied  his  signatures  on  Exts.  M3  to  M7- The  statements  Exts.  M3  to  M7  clearly  show  that  the  affected  workman  was  given an  opportunity  to  cross  examine  the  prosecution  witnesses  and  did  in  fact  cross- examine  them  at  length.  He  also  lead  defence  witnesses_and  rnade  a  statement that  he  had  no  more  witness  to  examine  in  his  defence.  Thus.  I  do  not  find  any fault  in  the  enquiry.  But  the  question  is  whether  the  finding  of  the  enquiry  officer, namely,  that  the  affected  workman  was  guilty  of  the  charge  was  correct  or  pur- verse-  I  am  not  expected  to  sit  over  the  enquiry  as  an  appellate  authority  and enter  into  appreciation  of  evidence  I  have  to  see  whether  there  is  any  material  to support  the  finding  arrived  at  by  the  enquiry  officer.  As  I  have  already  pointed out,  the  charge  was  that  the  affected  workman  had  conteryened  clause  19(1)  o i t he Standing  Orders  by  disobeying  a  lawful  or  reasonable  order  of  his  superior.  The

•  '
-
twrder  In  question  of  the  manager  to  him  was  to  remove  the unauthorised  gumti  kept by  him  on  the  Co.'s  land.  All  through  the  affected  workman  had  denied  that  he had  kept  any  unauthorised  gumti  on  the  Co-'s  land.  Hence,  the  onus  was  lying  on the  prosecution  to  establish  that  the  affected  workman  had  kept  an  unauthorised gumti  on  the  Co.'s  land  and  that  he  had  disobeyed  the  older  of  the  manager  by not  removing  it-  In  order  to  establish  the  fact  of  the  affected  workman  having kept  an  unauthorised  gumti  on  the  Co.'s  land  the  prosecution  had  examined  two witnesses,  B.  Lai,  Clerk  and  L.  H.  Parvatiyar,  Welfare  Officer,  whose  statements respectively  are  Exts.  M4  and  M3.  The  witness  L.  H.  Parvatiyar  had  no  personal knowledge  at  all  about  the  fact  and  his  source  of  information  was  only  the  witness B.  Lai-  The  witness,  B.  Lai,  said  that  he  had  heard  from  others  and  also  had  seen on  a  few  occasslons  the  affected  workman  selling  Pan,  Biri,  at  the  gumti-  The defence  witnesses,  Mandlp  and  Hari,  whose  statements  respectively  are  Exts-  M6 and  M7  had  categorically  deposed  that  the  gumti  in  question  belonged  to  one Muneshwar,  Ex-employee  and  the  gumtl's  shop  was  being  run  by  his  son-  The prosecution  did  not  even  choose  to  cross  examine  the  two  defence  witnesses.  The prosecution  witness  B. Lai  is,  admittedly,  a  clerk  and  a  subordinate  to L.  H.  Parvati- yar  the  Welfare  Officer.  Thus,  it  was  for  the  enquiry  officer  to  consider  if  the  soli- tary  statement  of  an  interested  witness  that  he  saw  on  a  few  occassion  the  affected workman  selling Pan, Biri  etc , from  the  gumti's  shop outweighed  the evidence  of  the two  defence  witnesses  whom  the  prosecution  did  not  choose  even  to  cross-examine- The  prosecution  did  not  choose  to  examine  Maheshwar.  Para  2 cf  the  failure  report of  the  Conciliation  Officer,  received  along  with  the  reference,  shows  that  at  the request  of  the  parties  the  Conciliation  Officer  had  made  a  spot  enquiry  to  ascertain the  correct  position  of  the  case-  At  the  request  of  the  workmen  the  file  of  the  Con- ciliation  Officer  No.  D-149/l(121)/65  was  summoned-  In  paragraph  6  at  page  38 of  the  file  the  Conciliation  Officer  has  mentioned  that  his  spot  enquiry  also  revealed that  the  shop  was  actually  run  by  the  son  of  Muneshwar,  who  was  dismissed  by  the management  about  8 months  ago.  On  this  material  I  have  no hesitation  to  hold  that the  finding  of  the  enquiry  officer  was  purverse.  On  behalf  of  the  workmen  some more  material  is  brought  on  record  to  show  that  even  after  the  Impugned  order  the employers  have  issued  further  chargesheets  to  the  affected  workman  charging  him for  disobedience  under  clause  19(1)  of  the  standing  orders  for  not  removing  the gumti.  I  did  not  choose to take  note  of  the' material,  because  it  is  not  quite  relevant. The  Inference  is  Irresistible  that  the  employers  have  chosen  the  action  against  the affected  workman,  probably,  to  victimise  him  for  his  trade  union  activities,  as  plead- ed  by  the  workmen  and  spoken  to  by WW1-
6.  I,  therefore,  hold  that  the  management  of  Digwadih  Colliery  of  M/s  Tata Iron  &  Steel  Co.  Ltd..  were  not  justified  In  susoending  the  affected  workman, Bnjnarain  Singh,  C R-O-  Labour  for  10  days  with  effect  from  1st  March  1965  and consequently,  direct  that  the  employers  should  pay  to  him  the  waijes  and  emolu- ments,  if  any,  due  to  him  for  the  period  of  suspension,  as  though  he  was  In  con- tinuous  service.  The  award  is  made  accordingly  and  submitted  under  section  15 of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.
(Sd-)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.
APPENDIX  I
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AT  DHANBAD. REFERENCE NO.  6I  OP  1967.
PARTIES :  Employer* In ration  to the  DigwadUl Colliery of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  & Steel  Co.  Ltd. (Jamadoba,  P.O.  Jealgora,  District  Dhanbad).
AND
Their  Workmen.
List  of  Documerfts  admitted in  Evidence for Employers
Description  of document  and  date.
Distinguishing mark or number
Date of admission.
Proved  by
Whether ad- mitted  or  ! proved
Ext.  Ml
L
Chargeoheet No. 46 dt.  3/4-2-65  to  Briinarayaii
Singh,  C.R.O.  labour.
Fxt. M2
Letter No.* 53 dt.  13-2-65 Notice of enquiry  ,
31-8-67 ,  Do.
Proved Do.
MWi. Do.

SEC  3(il)}  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  lttfl/KARTIKA  27,  188B  4$9$
Distinguishing Description  of document & date.
Whether Proved by
Date of admission
mark or number
admitted or proved
31-8-67
Do.
Proved Do.
MW  1 Do.
Statement  of L.H. Parvatiyar, Welfare  Officer Statement  of Sri B. Lai Clerk  Gr,  II Statement  of  Brijnarayan  Singh,  C.  R.  0.
Ext. M3 Ext. M4 Ext. M5
Labour
Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.
Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.
Ext.  M6 Ext. M7 Bxt.  M8 Ext.  M9
Statement of Mandip, C.R.O. labour Statement of Hari, C.R.O. loader. Finding of the  Enquiry  Officer. Letter  of suspension to Brijnarayan  Singh  .
Do. Do. Do. Do. Do.
List  of  Document;  admitted  in  evidence for  workmen
Description  of document  & date
Whether  admitted Distinguishing
Date of admission
mark or number
or  Proved. Proved  by
Brijnarayan  Singh's letter dt.  5-2-65
Ext. Wi
to Manager
31-8-67 Admitted
Brijnarayan  Singh's  letter  dated  26-2-65
Ert. Wa
Do.
Do.
Do.
to  Manager
. . ..
Chargesheet  No.  138  dt.  22/23-4-65  to  Sri
Ext. W3
Do.
Do.
Do.
Bnjnarayan  Singh along with reply
Enquiry notice reg.  c/sheet  No.  4  dt.  I2-I-66
Ext. W4
D o,
Do.
issued to Brijnarayan  Singh
Ext. W5 Enquiry  notice reg. c/sheet  No.  19  dt. 22/24-1-66 issued to Brijnarayan  Singh
Do. Do.
Do. D.i.
Failure report  dated 29-6-65 in original Membership receipt book for  the year  1963-
Ext. W6 Ext, W7
W i. 64
. . ..
Proved Do.
Ext. W8 True  copy of membership  receipt
Do. Do.
Do.
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  HAO, Presiding  Officer,
Central  Government Additional  Industrial
Tribunal  at Dhanbad.
APPENDIX  II
;RETHEC3!MrA.\L  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL
AT  DHANBAD.
REFBRENCE  Nt>.  61.  op  1967.
PARTIES  : Employers  in  relation  to  the  Digwadih  Colliery  of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  &  Steel  Co.  Ltd.
(Jamadoba,  P.O. Jealgora, District  Dhanbad).
AND
Theii  Workmen.
List  of  Witnesses Examined for  tht  Employer!
1  Name of the  witness
Dt. of examination
No. of witness
L.H.  Parvfttiyar
,  Ji-8ri967.
MWi  :

4390  THK  CAZffm  Ofr  INfilA:  NoVfiWflift  I".  lfltf7/fcARTlKA  S7. 1"B9  [*AK*  I t-
Lisr  0/ WjYMWj"i  Examined for  the  Workmen
No. of witness
Name of the  witness
Dt.  of examination
MWi  ] Qrfj Narayan 5in
31-8-1967.
(Sd-)  N.  VENKATA  RAO, Presiding  Officer,
Central Government Additional Industrial,
Tribunal at Dhanbad.
[No.  2/68/65-LRII.I
New  Delhi,  the  9th  November  1967
S.O.  4107—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947 (14  of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of the  Industrial  Tribunal,  Jabalpur,  In  the  industrial-dispute  between  the  employers In  relation  to  the  Burlier  and  Amlai  Collieries  ofi  Messrs  Rewa  Coal  Fields,  Post Office  Dhanpuri,  (District  Shahdol,  Madhya  Pradesh),  and  their  workmen,  which was  received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVT.  INDUSTRIAL  T R I B U N A L - C U M - L A B O U R;
COURT,  JABALPUR
Dated, October  20,  1967
PRESENT:
Sri  G.  C.  Agarwala—Presiding  Officer.
REFERENCE  NO.  CGIT/LC(R)  2  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Burhar  and  Amlai  Collieries,  P.  O.  Dhanpuri, District  Shahdol  (M-P.)
Versus
Their  workmen  through  the  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha,  P.  O,  Dhanpuri.
District  Shahdol.
APPEARANCES :
For  Employers—S/Stl  Ujagar  Singh  and  S.  D.  Singh  Labour  Officers For  Workmen—Sri  P.  K-  Thakur,  Vice-President
A.WARD
The  Ministry  of  Labour,  Employment  and  Rehabilitation  by  Notification No-  5/50/66-LRII  dated  20th  January  1967  referred  the  following  dispute,  under Section  10  ID.  Act  for  adjudication  to  this  Tribunal-
Matter  of  Dispute
Whether  the  management  of  the  Burhar  &  Amlai  Collieries  of  Messrs  B"wa Coalfields  is  justified  in  removing  Shrl  DukalOo  Son  of  Mayaram, Loader,  in  Burhar  Colliery  No.  2,  from  service  ?  If  not,  to  what relief  the  workman  is  entitled ?
The  dispute  was  raised  by  the  workman  concered,  Shri  DukaloOj  in  concilia- tion  under  Section  2A  of  I.D.  Act  and  not  through  a  Union.  In  the  initial  stages of  the  proceeding  before  this  Tribunal,  Burhar  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sabha  continued to  represent  without  authorisation  as  a  Union  and  filed  the  statement  of  claim- When  the  error  was  detected,  Dukaloo  himself  was  required  to  file  statement  of claim  which  he  did  at  a  very  late  stage  and  authorised  the  same  Union  Office bearers  to  represent  him.
 
Dukaloo  was  a  permanent  Loader  In  Burhar  Mines  No.  2-  He  proceeded  on leave  for  16  days  up  to  17th  February  1066  and  was  due  t6  feptet  for  duty  oH 18th  February,  1966.  He  sent  an  application  from  his  home  village  on  17th  Feb- ruary  1686  but  which  was  received  by  the  management  on  24th  February  1968. Thd

management,  therefore,  rejected  the  application  lor  extension  of,  leave  by  11  day" and  sent  a  communication  on  25th  February  1906  to  the  village  address  of  Dukaloo that  he  should  report  for  duty.  This  communication  was  not  received  by  Pukaloo, and  was  returned  back  undelivered-  According  to  Dukaloo,  presuming  that  his application  for  extension  of  leave  had  been  granted  by  the  management,  he remained  in  his  village  and  came  and  reported  for  duty  on  4th  March  1066-  He was,  however,  not  allowed  to  resume  duty  and  was1 put  off  on  one  pretext  or  the ether  by  the  Labour  Welfare  Officer.  He  gave  an  application  to  th
The  case  of  Dukaloo  that  ho  came  and  reported  for  duty  on  1th  March  1966  is obviously  false-  This  Is  evident  by  the  fact  that  on  receipt  of  his  application dated  17th  February  1966  (Ex.  E-  7)  he  was  informed  by  the  management  by  letter dated  25th  February  1966  (Ex,  E/  1)  that  he  should  immediately  report  for  duty. This  communication  was  sent  under  registered  post,  the  original  envelope  being Ex.  E-  3.  There  is  an  endorsement  dated  9th  March  1966  of  the  Postman  that Dukaloo  refused  to  accept  the  same-  It  follows  therefore  that  atleast  till  Oth March  1966,  he  was  in  his  village-  He  equld  not  possibly  have  come  to  Burhar On  4th  March,  1966  to  report  for  duty-  He  made,  thoroughly  contradictory  and Inconsistent  statements.  He  stated  that  Labour  Welfare  Officer  took  the  postal acknowledgment  receipt  and  letter  of  the  Manager  sanctioning  leave  but  did  not return  the  same-  He  asked  him  to  come  after  8 days  and  though  he  went  frequently, he  was  not  allowed  to  resume  duty.  There  was  obviously  no  letter  of  sanction of  leave  and  he  admitted  in  cross  examination  that  he  treated  the  postal  acknow- ledgment  card  as  sanction  of  leave.  In  further  cross-examination  he  introduced a  new  fact  that  he  gave  an  application  to  the  Assistant  manager.  Shri  Stnha,  a fact  which  he  had  neither  alleged  in  his  statement  otf  claim  nor  in  his  examination In-chief-  On  behalf  of  the  management,  the  Labour  Welfare  Officer,  Shri  Z  Warsi was  examined  and  he  denied  that  Dukaloo  met  him  at  any  time  between  February and  April.  It  was  only  after  his  services  had  been  terminated  for  continued absence  for  more  than  30  days  that  he  came  and  implored  for  re-employment which  could  not  be  done-  The  evidence  of  Rajmani  Singh  (E.  W-  2)  enmp  Chow- kidar  of  Labour  Quarter  confirmed  the  fact  that  Dukaloo  was  not  seen  in  his  quarter during  the  months  of  March  and  April  1966.  This  oral  evidence  Is  lent  support bv  the  report  of  Wage  Clerk  (Ex.  E-  4)  dated  21st  March  1966  seeking  instructions that  as  Dukaloo  had  been  absenting  for  more  than  30  days  he  may  be  advised In  the  matter.  The  Welfare  Officer  was  directed  to  discuss  and  as  stated  by Shri  Warsi,  he  advised  termination  whereupon  letter  of  termination  (Ex.  E-  2) <*vas  sent-  If  Dukaloo*  had  appeared  earlier  in  early  March,  there  would  have been  no  occasion  to  report  for  his  continued  absence  by  the  Wage  Clerk  nor  the Welfare  Officer  Would  have  so  advised-  It  was  only  after  termination  of  his services  because  of  continued  absence  had  been  intimated  for  which  is  the  postal acknowledgment  card  (Ex.  E.  5)  that  he  appeared  and  wanted  re-emplcyment. There  is,  therefore,  no  truth  in  his  case.
On  his  behalf,  it  was  contended  that  clause  17(li)  of  the  standing  Orders  was inapplicable  as  it  related  to  misconduct  and  that  the  relevant  provision  is  Clause 10(e).  Under  this  clause  a  workman  was  liable  to  lose  lien  on  over-staying  leave and  on  failure  to"  explain  satisfactorily  his  absence,  to  the  Manager  under  sub clause  (f),  and  is  also  liable  for  diclplinary  action.  Under  Clause  17 (il)  continued absencs  without  permission  for  30  days  or  more  entailed  automatic  termination- Both  these  powers  are  available  to  the  management  and  It  is  Wffona  to  contend that  clause  17(li)  is  a  provision  for  misconduct  and  for  which  explanation  and diciplinary  proceedings  are  required.  The  relevent  provision  far  disciplinary proceedings  are  contained  in  sutvclause  (UI)  of  clause  1?  which  specifically  states •"that  no  order  of  punishment  under  Standing  Order  No-  17(i)  shall  be  rnade unless  the  workman  cemoeraed  is  Informed  in  writing  ol  the  an"ffed  misconduct aad  given  an  opportunity  to  explain  the  allegation,  made  against  him'.  ft  $s  thus manifest  that  sub-clause  3  governs  sub-clause  (I)  and  not  "ub-elauee  fti>-  Con- sequently,  departmental  proceedings  for  absence  mentioned  in  sub-clause  (i)  was not  require*.  Th"  maatootloa,  theroforw,  ts  dearly  unteaabl*.

Decision
The  result,  therefore,  is  that  the  management  was  Justified  In  removing  Shrf Dukaloo  from  service  and  he  is  not  entitled  to  any  relief.
(Sd.)  G.  C-  AGABWALA,
Presiding  Officer,
20-10-67 [No.  5/S0/66-LRII.]
S-O.  4108.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  ( 1* of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Additional  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the employers  in  relation  to  the  Malkera  Colliery,  Post  Office  Malkera,  District  Dhan- bad  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  and  Steel  Company  Limited,  Jamadoba,  Post  Office  Jeal- ftora,  District  Dhanbad  and  their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  the  Central Government  on  the  31st  October,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes Act,  1947,
REFERENCE  NO,  81  OP  1987 PARTIES:  Employers  in  relation  to  the  Malkera  Colliery,  P.O.  Malkera,  Dist. Dhanbad  of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  and  Steel  Company  Ltd.,  Jamadoba,  P.O, Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen
PRESENT:  Shri  Nandagiri  Venkata  Rao,  Presiding  Officer. APPEARANCES ; For  the  Employers:  Shri  L-  H  Parvatiyar,  Legal  Assistant.
For  the  Workmen;  Shri  B-  N.  Sharrna,  President,  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh,  Bihar.
STATE:  Bihar.
INDUSTRY:  Coal.
Dhanbad,  dated  the  26th  October,  1967/4  Kartika,  1889
AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Malkera  Colliery,  P.  O.  Malkera,  Dist. Dhanbad  of  M/s.  Tata  Iron  and  Steel  Co.  Ltd.,  Jamadoba,  P.O.  Jealgora,  Dist- Dhanbad  and  their  workmen,  by  its  order  No.  2/109/65-LR.II  dated  6th  Novem- ber  1965 referred  to  the  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  under section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  for  adjudication  the  dispute in  respect  of  the  matters  specified  in  the  schedule  annexed  thereto.  The  schedule la  extracted  below:
"SCHEDULE
Whether  the  management  of  Malkera  Colliery  of  Messrs  Tata  Iron  and:
Steel  Company  Limited,  Jamadoba,  P.O.  Jealgora  (District  Dhanbad) was  justified  in  terminating  the  lien  on  appointment  of  Shri  Ram Jalam  Sao  (Ticket  No.  62775),  miner,  and  placing  his  name  in  the 'Badli  List'  with  effect  from  the  6th  July,  1965? If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
2.  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the  refer- ence  as  reference  No,  181  of  1965  on  its  file.  The  workmen  filed  their  statement of  demands.  While  it  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrial Tribunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the  Central Government  by  its  order  No.  8/25/67-LRII  dated  8th  May  1967  under  section 33(B)(1)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947.  Consequently,  the  reference  is renumbered  on  the  flle  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No.  81 of  1967.  The  employers also  filed  their  statement  of  demands.
 
'G96T  ^BW  *SIG  utcij  v>3£3 iflTA*.  s/;op  gz  JOJ 3AB3I  pa;uBU  BBM  an  -BJa^oiama 31ft  jo  AiarnoQ  Bia^n^M  axri  ur  jauiuj  e  SBAV  (uBun[joAi  pepanu  aip  su  o;  pajiajgj a s i j m i p i a q)  ( 9 i i S9  'O fl  l a s p l i)  o Bg  u n s [ Bf  u n ru  ' U H U T J I J O AI  pajrwffTJ  a qx  •£

Sio.  8(jJ)]  THE  GAZETTE  OF INDJtA:  NOVEMBER  18, I967/KJ  ^
Through  his  application  dated  23rd  June  1965  he  applied  for  extension  of  leave for  16  days.  But  the  employers  rejected,  the  extension  of  leave  sought  for.  By the  letter  dated  6th  July  1965  the  employers  informed  the  affected  workman that  he  had  lost  his  lien  on  his  appointment,  that  his  name  had  been  struck  off from  the  permanent  rolls  and  that  it  was  being  entered  inlo  the  list  of  "badlies". The  affected  workman  approached  the  employers  subsequently  but  to  no  avail These  facts  are  not  in  depute.  The  rase  of  the  workmen  Is  that  the  action  taken by  the  employers  against  the  affected  workman  without  giving  him  an  opportunity to  explain  his  inability  to  report  to  duty  before  expiry  of  the  leave  and  lead  evi- dence  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  management,  was  against  the  spirit  of  the  Certified Standing  Orders  of  the  employers  colliery  and  principles  of  natural  justice  The employers  justified  their  action  under  the  certified  standing  orders  and  further pleaded  that  the  dispute  involved  in  the  reference  was  not  an  industrial  dispute but  was  an  individual  dispute.
4.  The  workmen  were  represented  by  Shri  B-  N.  Sharma,  President  Congress Mazdoor  Sangh  and  the  employers  by  Shri  L.  H.  Parvatiyar,  Legal  Assistant.  By the  consent  of  the  workmen  Exts.  Ml  to  Mil  were  marked  for  the  employers. No  witness  is  examined  by  any  party.  The  order  of  reference  clearly  states  that the  Central  Government  was  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  existed  between the  parties  to  the  reference,  as  such,  the  burden  was  lying  on  the  employers  to show  that  the  dispute  was  not  an  industrial  dispute  but  an  individual  dispute. But  they  have  brought  absolutely  no  material  on  record  to  substantiate  their objection.  In  the  statement  filed  by  them  the  employers  expressed  their  ignor- ance  about  the  affected  workman  being  a  member  of  Congress  Mazdoor  Sangh or  any  union.  The  failure  report  accompanying  the  reference  shows  that  the dispute  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  was-  espoused  by  the  Congress  Mazdoor Sangh.  In  this  view  I  hold  the  objection  as  not  sustainable.
5.  The  employers  have  relied  upon  the  unreported  judgment  of  the  Supreme Court  in  Civil  Appeal  No.  549  of  1967  to  justify  their  action  in  terminating  the lien  of  the  affected  workman  on  his  permanent  appointment  and  placing  him  on the  badll  list-  That  was  a  case  which  arose  out  of  an  application  of  a  workman filed  under  Section  33A  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1147,  complaining  that  the termination  of  his  service  pending  the  industrial  dispute  was  improper.  It.was held—
I
"Where,  therefore,  a  standing  order  provides  that  a  workman  would  lose his  lien  on  his  appointment,  if  he  does  not  join  his  duty  within  certain time  after  his  leave  expires,  it  can  only  mean  that  his  service  stands automatically  terminated  when  the  contingency  happens".
But  the  Certified  Standing  Orders  relevant  to  that  case  or  S.O.(11  in  Sec. G  of the  certified  standing  orders  which  were  interpreted  by  his  Lordship  for  arriving at  the  conclusion  referred  to  above,  are  not  produced  before  me.  S.O.(l)  in  Sec. G of  the  standing  orders  is  not  extracted  in  the  judgment  either.  It  is  significant to  note  that  before  arriving  at  the  conclusion  his  Lordship  himself  had  observed, "the  standing  order  is  inartisticaily  worded".  The  relevant  portion  of  clause  9 of  the  Certified  Standing  Orders  in  the  instant  case  is—
"If  the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally granted  or  subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appoint- ment  unless"  etc.
In  view  of  this  wording  the  interpretation  does  not  appeal  to  me  that  when the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally  granted  or subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  lien  on  his  appointment  automatically. There  are  two  more  conditions  to  be  satisfied  before  the  absentee  employee  loses his  lien  namely,  his  returning  within  8  days  and  submitting  an  explanation  to the  satisfaction'of  the  Manager  about  his  inability  to  return  before  the  expiry  of the  leave.  It  is  manifest  that  unless  the  Manager  applies  his  mind  and  finds  the explanation  offered  as  not  satisfactory  the  lien  of  the  absentee  employee  cannot be  lost.  It  also  follows  that  to  satisfy  the  Manager  the  absentee  employee  should have  an  opportunity  to  place  the  necessary  material,  in  other  words  evidence, in  support  of  his  explanation.  Thus,  the  management  canno_t  terminate  the  lien of  the  absentee  employee  on  his  permanent  appointment  and  place  his  name  on the  badli  list  without  giving  him  an  opportunity  to  explain  and  to  produce evidence  in  support  of  the  explanation.  No  such  opportunity  was  given  to  the affected  workman  in  the  present  case.  • Consequently,  the  order  of  the  employeiS dated  6th  July  1965,  Ext  M4  cannot  stand. .

44JW  "^  "Off  INDIA.:  NOVEMBER  18, 1M7/KART1KA  21. IW9  [PAiyr  l i-
ft. I.  therefore,  hold  that  the  management  of  Malkera  Colliery,  of  M/s,  Tata Iron  and  Steel  Co.  Ltd.,  JamadQba,  P.O.  Jealgora,  (Dist.  Dhanbad)  was  not  justi- fied  in  terminating  the  lien  on  appointment  of  the  affected  workman.  Ram  Jalam Sao  (Ticket  No.  62775),  miner,  and  placing  his  name  on  the  'Badli  List'  with  effect from  6th  July  1965,  and,  consequently  I  direct  that  he  be  reinstated  to  his  perma- nent  appointment  with  effect  from  6th  July  1965  and  be  paid  all  his  wages  and dues,  if  any,  as  though  the  lien  on  his  appointment  as  a  miner  of  the  colliery was  never  terminated.  The  award  is  made  accordingly  and  submitted  under nection  15  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947,
(Sd.)  N-  VBNXATA  R'AO,
Presiding  Officer.
APPENDIX  I
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT DHANB.AD
R"(ffiREf"}p No. 81 OH 1967
PARTIES :  Employers  in  relation  tQ the  Malkera  Colliery,
P.O.  Milkers  Dist.  Dhanbad  of M/s.  Tata  Iron & Stcd  Co.. Ltd.,  Jamadoba, P.O.  Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad.
ANQ
Theii  Workmen.
List  of  Documents Admitted  in  Evidence for  the Employers
Proved by Description  of  document  & date
Dt.  of admission
Distinguish- ing  mark or Hllrnber
Whether admitted  or proved
Original leave application of Sri Rarn
Ext.Mi  .
11-9.-67
Admitted
Jalam Saw dt 26-5-65
Fxt.Mz  . Original  extension  of  leave  applica- tion of Sri Ram Jalam Saw in Hindi dt, 23-6-65
Do.
Do.
* *
Ext.M3  .
Do.
Copy  of letter  No. MLK. 18-65/546 dt.  29-6-65  issued  to  Sri  Ram Jalam Saw  . . ..
Do.
Bxt.M4  .
Do.
Do.
Copy of letter No. MLK. 54-65/5629 at.  6/7-7-65  issued  to  Sri Ram Jalam Saw  . . ..
Postal  receipt  dt.  8-7-65  by  which
Ext.M5  .
letter  mentioned in item No. 5 was sent  to  Sri Ram Jalam  Saw under Rcgd. post  . . ..
Do.
Do.
Ext.M6  .
Do.
Do.
Acknowledgement  card  showing the receipt of letter  mentioned in item no. 5  .  .  .  .  . Original  application  dt.  27-7-65  by
Hxt.M7  .
Do.
Do.
Sri  Ram  Jalam  Saw  with  enve- lope
Ext.M8  .
Do.
Do,
But.M9  .
Do.
Do.
Copy  of  letter  No.  JMB/479/HO45 dt.  24/2S-9-65  issued  to  Sri Ram Jalam Saw  . . .. Peon  Book  by  which,  the  letter  dt. 24/28-9-65  was issued  to Sri Ram Jalam Saw  . . ..
Bin.Mto  . Sighted  copy  of  conciliation  officer's report  addressed  to the C.L.C.(C) New  Delhi,  dt.  28/29-9-65  with copies  to  the  wnplgyera  and the Congress Mazdoor  Sangh  .
9 •
• f Copy of Ca's.  ttwdbig  Wf  •
Do. Do.
Hit.Mn  .
na Po.

4ift  "{U>]  THF  GA2KTTR  OF  JNJMA:  NOVEMBER  18,  .  ;>KA  .  A  *,,  /  .
List  of  Documents Admitted  in  Evidence for  the  Worhmtfl
Proved  by Description  of  document  &  date Dt.  of admission
"Distinguish- ing  mark  or •number
Whether admitted  or proved
NIL
NIL
NIL
NIL
NIL
(Sd.)  N-  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer, Central  Govt,  Additional  Industrial Tribunal  at  Dhanb($
APPENDIX  II
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL  AT DHANBAD
REFERENCE  N O.  8I  OF  1967
PARTIBS  :  Employers  in relation to  the  Malkera  Colliery, P.O.  Malkcra,  Dint.  Dhanbad  of M/s,  Tata  Iron  &  Steel  Co.  Ltd.,  Jamadoba, P.O.  Jealgora,  Dist.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen.
List  of  Witnesses  Examined  for  the  Employers
Name  of the witness
Date  of  examination ND. of witness
NIL
NIL
NIL
List  of  Witnesses  Examined for  the Workmen
Name  of the witness
No. of witness
Date of examination
NIL
NIL
NIL
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Omcer, Central  Goyt.  Additional  Industrial Tribunal,  Dhanbad
[No.  a/109/85-LJUI.]
S.O.  4109—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Additional  Industrial  Tribunal  Dhanbad,  in  thq  jrjdusttrial  dispute  between  the •mployera  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,  Post  Office  Bhowra,  District  Dhan- Wd,  and  their  workmen,  which  was  received  by  tha  Central  Government  oa  th" Slit  Ootobtr.  196?.

4402  THE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18, 1967/KARTIKA'2tf,  1889  [PA*r  I I-
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL  AT  DHANBAD
In  the  matter  of  a  reference  under  section  10(1) (d)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes
Act,  1&47.
REFERENCE  NO.  66  OF  1967
PARTIES :
Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,  P.O.  Bhowra,  Dist.  Dhanbad,
AND
Their  Workmen.
PRESENT:
Shri  Nandagiri  Venkata  Rao,  Presiding  Officer.
APPEARANCES:
For  the  Employers—Shrl  K.  C-  Nandeolyar,  Dy-  Chief  Personnel  Officer. For  the  Workmen—Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Con-
Kress.
STATE:  Bihar.
INDUSIRY:  Coal.
Dhanbad,  dated  the  26th  October  1967 AWARD
The  Central  Government,  being  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  exists between  the  employers  In  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,  P.O.  Bhowra,  Dist. Dhanbad  and  their  workmen,  by  its  order  No.  2/33/65/LRII  dated  23rd  August 1965  referred  to  the  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  under section  10(1)  (d)  -of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  for  adjudication  the  dispute in  respect  of  the  matters  specified  in  the  schedule  annexed  thereto.  The  schedule is  extracted  below:
"SCHEDULE
(1)  Whether  the  management  of  the  Bhowra  Colliery  was  justified  in  ter-
minating  the  services  of  Shri  Tiroo  Pashi,  Pick  Miner,  7/10  Incline?
(2)  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?"
2.  The  Central  Government  Industrial  Tribunal,  Dhanbad  registered  the  re- ference  as  reference  1Mb. 135 of  1965 on  its  file-  The  workmen  filed  their  statement of  demands.  While  it  was  pending  before  the  Central  Government  Industrial Tribunal,  Dhanbad  the  proceeding  was  transferred  to  this  Tribunal,  by  the  Cen- tral  Government  by  Its  order  No.  R/25/07-LRII  dated  8th  May  1967  under  Section 33(B)(I)  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act.  1047.  Consequently,  the  reference  is; renumbered  on  the  file  of  this  Tribunal  as  reference  No.  G8  of  1967.  The  em- ployers  also  filed  their  statement  of  demands.
 
3.  The  affected  workman,  Tiroo  Pashi,  (hereinafter  referred  to  as  the  affected workman)  was  a  pick  miner,  7/10  Incline  of  the  Bhowra  Colliery  of  the  employ- ers.  He  was  granted  leave  with  effect  from  15th  June  1964  for  14 days  for  build- ing  his  house.  He  was  to  report  to  duty  on  1st  July  1964. But  on  27th  June  1964 he  sent  a  letter  stating  that  the  construction  of  the  house  was  not  completed and  praying  for  further  extension  of  leave.  No  reply  was  sent  to  this  application. The  affected  workman  appeared  before  the  management  on  25th  July  1964  for duty.  But  the  management  did  not  permit  him  to  resume  duty  and  gave  a  notice on  the  same  day  to  show  cause  why  disciplinary  action  should  not  be  taken against  him  for  contravening  the  certified  standing  orders.  The  affected  workman submitted  his  explanation  on  27th  June  1964.  The  management  did  not  consider the  explanation  satisfactory.  On  29th  July  1964  the  management  issued  notice to  the  affected  workman  and  started  the  departmental  enquiry  at  4  P.M. on  the same  day.  The  enquiry  was  conducted  by  the  Labour  Welfare  Officer.  During the  enquiry  the  statement  of  the  affected  workman  was  recorded  and  through the  enquiry  report  dated  31st  July  1964  the  Enquiry  Officer  found  the  charge against  the  affected  workman  proved.  On  this  the  Manager  passed  the  order  on 3rd  August  1964,  stating  that  the  affected  workman  had  lost  lien  on  the  job. These  facts  are  not  in  dispute.  The  case  of  the  workmen  is  that  before  expiry of  the  sanctioned  leave  the  affected  workman  had  sent  an  application  dated  27thk June  1964  for  extension  but,  the  management  did  not  send  him  any  reply  and, as  such  he  presumed  that  his  prayer  had  been  acceded  to  by  the  management; that  the  departmental  enquiry  against  him  was  purfunctory,  that  the  finding  of the  enquiry  officer  was  purverse  and  that  the  termination  of  his  Service  was  urw just  The  stand  taken  by  the  employers  is  that  in-  the  application  for  extension

dated  27th  June  1964 the  affected  workman  did  not  mention  the  period  ,of  exten-- sion  sought  for  and,  as  such,  the  application  was  not  considered  by  the  manage^- ment,  that  the  explanation  submitted  by  him  on  27th  June  1964 was  also not  satis- factory,  that  the  enquiry  was  held  after  notice  to  him  and  giving  him  an  oppor- tunity  to  explain,  that  in  the  explanation  he  admitted  that  the  application  fo£ extension  dated  27th  June  1964  did  not  contain  the  number  of  days  for  which the  extension  of  leave  was  sought  for,  that  the  finding  of  the  enquiry  officer  wa* correct  and  that  termination  of  his  service  was  proper  and  justified.  They  had also  taken  an  objection  that  the  dispute  involved  in  the  reference  was  not  an. industrial  dispute  but  was  an  individual  dispute.
4,  The  workmen  were  represented  by  Shri  Prasanta  Burman,  Secretary,  Khan Mazdoor  Congresg  and  the  employers  by  Shri  K.  C.  Nandkeolyar,  Deputy  Chief' Personnel  Officer.  On  behalf  of  the  workmen  a  witness,  WW1  was  examined  and Ext.  Wl  was  marked.  On  behalf  of  the  employers  also  a  witness,  MW1  was  exa- mined  and  Exts.  Ml  to  M10  were  marked.  The  order  under  reference  states  that the  Central  Government  was  of  opinion  that  an  industrial  dispute  existed  between the  parties.  The  order  of  reference  was  accompanied  by  a  copy  of  the  failure- report  of  the  Conciliation  Officer,  The  report  points  out  that  xhe  dispute  was represented  before  the  Conciliation  Officer  on  behalf  of  the  affected  workman  by the  General  Secretary,  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress,  P.O.  Jharia,  Dist.  Dhanbad.  Thus, the  onus  was  lying  on  the  employers  to  prove  that  the  dispute  involved  in  the reference  was  not  an  industrial  dispute  but  was  merely  an  individual  dispute. But  the  employers  neither  examined  any  witness  nor  brought  on  record  any  mate- rial  to  substantiate  the  objection  taken  by  them.  On  behalf  of  the  workman  th*1 Secretary  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  is  examined  as  WW1.  It  is  in  his  evi- dence  that  the  effected  workman  was  a  member  <5f the  union  in  1963-64  and  that in  the  year  1964-65  the  total  membership  of  Bhowra  branch  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor Congress  was  more  than  600.  He  Rave  evidence  with  the  help  of  the  membership register  and  the  entry  in  the  register  at  SI.  No.  27  relating  to  the  affected  work- man  is  marked  as  Ext.  Wl.  In  the  cross-examination  it  is  elicited  that  the  wit- ness  was  the  Secretary  of  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress  only  since  June  or  July, 1967  and  prior  to  it  he  had  no  concern  with  the  Khan  Mazdoor  Congress.  But the  witness  gave  evidence  on  the  basis  of  the  record  and  not  from  his  personal knowledge  and  the  record  is  not  challenged.  On  this  material  I  have  no  hesita- tion  to  hold  that  the  objection  raised  by  the  employers  is  devoid  of  substance.
5.  Admittedly,  the  affected  workman  was  granted  leave  of  14  days  with  effect from  15th  June  1964  and  he  was  to  report  to  duty  on  1st  July  1964.  But  before the  expiry  of  the  granted  leave  he  sent  an  application,  Ext.  Ml  on  27th  June  1964 and  it  was  received  by  the  management  on  30th  June  1964,  before  the  expiry  of the  granted  leave.  The  management  did  not  send  any  reply  to  the  affected  work- man  as  regards  the  application,  Ext.  Ml.  The  contention  of  the  affected  workman is  that,  as  he  had  not  received  any  reply  to  his  application,  Ext.  Ml,  he  presumed that  his  leave  was  extended.  Under  clause  11  of  the  certified  standing;  orders  a mandatory  duty  is  cast  on  the  management  to  record  the  fact  in  writing  in  a leave  register  to  be  maintained  for  the  purpose  if  leave  is  refused  or  postponment and  the  reasons  for  such  refusal  or  postponment.  There  is  no  evidence  that  the management  has  compiled  with  this  statutory  obligation.  It  Is  simply  stated  that the  application  was  not  considered  because  it  did  not  mention  the  number  of  days for  which  the  extension  of  leave  was  sought  for.  It  is  true  that  in  the  applica- tion,  Ext.  Ml  it  was  merely  stated  that  as  the  construction  work  had  not  com- pleted  the  leave  may  be  extended.  The  management  could  grant  reasonable  e x- tension  or  to  reiect  the  extension  all  together.  Thev  ought  to  have  mentioned the  reasons  for  it  in  the  register  and  inform  the  affected  workman  so  that  he could  report  to  duty  without  any  delay.  In  his  explanation  to  the  chargesheet, Ext.  M3  as  well  as  in  his  statement  during  the  departmental  enquiry,  Ext.  M5 the  affected  workman  submitted  the  same  explanation  for  his  over-stay  of  the leave,  namely,  that  the  construction  of  the  house  had  not  completed.  In  the  en- quiry  the  enquiry  officer  put  a  question  to  the  affected  workman,  "Do  you  know that  the  leave  should  be  extended  only  to  a  particular  date  and  extension  of leave  without  any  date  is  of  no  value?"
The  workman  had  to  give  answer  to  the  question  and  the  answer  given  ijy him  is:
"It  is  true,  but  I  thought  that  If  the  tlmp  shown  by  me  proved  wrong  (if  I could  not  return  within  the  specified  time)  that  also  will  be  a  mistake on  my  part-  Surely  this  is  a  mistake  on  my  part"-
 
This  reply  Is  treated  by  the  enquiry  officer  as  an  admission  and  he  based  his finding  on  this.  But  the  question  IB, what  did  the  affeqted  Workman  admit?  He-

fog  admitted  his  mistake  In  not  mentioning  the  limit  to  which  he  sought  exten- sion  of  leave.  The  enquiry  officer  found  the  affected  workman  guilty.  It  does not  mean  that  the  affected  workman  was  guilty  of  overstaying  the  leave  granted to  him  without  any  valid  reason.  Regarding  the  reason  for  his  overstay  there was  absolutely  no  enquiry  and  no  opportunity  was  given  to  him.  Consequently, the  finding  of  the  enquiry  officer  is  nothing  hut  purverse  and  the  order  of  termi- nation  of  service  of  the  affected  workman  by  the  Manager  based  upon  this  find- ing  is  also  wrong  and  unjust.  Shri  K.  C.  Nandkeolyar,  appearing  for  "the  employ- ers  also  contended  that  as  per  clause  11 of  the  certified  standing  orders  the  affect- ed  workman  lost  lien  on  his  permanent  appointment  automatically  when  he  did not  return  within  8  days  of  expiry  of  the  granted  leave  and  submit  any  explana- tion  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  Manager  of  his  inability  to  return  before  the  expiry 
1PWhere;  therefore,  a  standing  order  provides  that  a  workman  would  lose his  lien  on  his  appointment,  If  he  does  not  join  his  duty  within  cer- tain  time  after  his  leave  expires,  It  can  only  mean  that  his  service stands  automatically  terminated  when  the  contingency  happens".
But  the  certified  standing  orders  relevant  to  that  case  or  S.O.(1J  in  Seq.  G  of -the  certified  standing  orders  which  were  interpreted  by  his  Lordship  for  arriving .at  the  conclusion  referred  to  above,  are  not  produced  before  me.  S.O. (1)  in Sec.  G  of  the  standing  orders  is  not  extracted  in  the  judgment  either.  It  is  sig- nificant  to  note  that  before  arriving  at  the  conclusion  his  Lordship  himself  had observed,  "the  standing  order  is  lnartisticajlv  worded".  The  relevant  portion  of • clause  11  of  the  Certified  Standing  Orders  in  the  instant  case  ia—
"If  the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally granted  or  subsequently  extended  he  shall  lo?e  his  Hen  on  his  appoint- ment  unless"  etc.
In  view  of  thia  wording  the  interpretation  does  not  appeal  to  me  that  when the  employee  remains  absent  beyond  the  period  of  leave  originally  granted  or subsequently  extended  he  shall  lose  his  hen  on  hla  appointment  automatically. There  are  two  more  conditions  to  be  satisfied  before  the  absentee  employee  loses his  lien,  namely,  his  returning  within  B days  and  submitting  an  explanation  to the  satisfaction  of  the  Manager  about  his  inability  to  return  before  the  expiry of  the  leave.  It  ia  manifest  that  unless  the  Manager  applies  hig  mind  and  finds the  explanation  offered  ns  not  satisfactory  the  lien  of  the  absentee  employee  can- not  be  lost.  It  also  follows  that  to  satisfy  the  Manager  the  absentee  employee should  have  an  opportunity  to  place  the  necessary  material,  in  otherwords  evi- dence,  in  support  of  hia  explanation.  Thus,  the  management  cannot  terminate the  lien  of  the  absentee  employee  on  his  permanent  appointment  and  place  his name  on  the  badli  list  without  giving  him  an  opportunity  to  explain  and  to  pro- duce  evidence  in  support  of  the  explanationi  No  such  opportunity  was  given  to tjie  affected  workman  in  the  present  case.  Consequently,  the  order  of  the  employ- ers  dated  3rd  August  1964,  Ext.  M7  cannot  stand.
6.  I,  therefore,  hold  that  the  management  of  the  Bhowra  Colliery  wag  not tuetified  in  terminating  the  services  qf  the  affected  workman,  Tiroo  Pasni,  Pick Miner,  7/10  Incline  with  immediate  effect  by  their  letter  dated  3rd  August  1964, und.  consequently,  I  set  aside  the  order  o|  termination  and  direct  that  the  affected workman  be  reinstated  to  his  permanent  appointment  with  effect  from  3rd  August 1964  and  be  paid  all  hia  wages  and  dues,  if  any,  ag  though  his  service  was  never terminated.  The  award  is  made  accordingly  and  submitted  under  section  15  of tthe  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947,
(S4  >  V-  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer.

Sao.  J{U)]  THE  GAZEtTfe  bt  WDIA;  NOVEMBER. 18,  I9ff7/KARTTCA Wt  " 8"  4 4^
APPENDIX  I
BEFORE  THE CENT TRAL  GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL- AT  DHANBAD
REFERENCE  N O. 66  OF  1967
PARTIES;  Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra  Colliery,
P.O.  Bhowraj Dist. Dhanbad.
AND
Their Workmen.
List  of  Documents Admitted  in  Evidence for  the Employers
Proved by
Description  of  docunwnt  &  date
Dt.  of admission
Distinguish- ing  mark  or number
Whether admitted  or proved
MWi Ext.Mi  . Leave  application  of  Tiroo  Pashi  .
Proved
13-9-67
Do.]
Exc.Mi(a) Postal  envelope  . . ..
Do.1
Do.1
Ext.Mz  .
Do.
Letter  of  explanation  dt.  25-7-64 issued  by  the  Manager  to  Sri  Tiroo Pasht
Do.]
Do. j
Ext.M3  .
Do.f R e p ly  of  t he  e x p l a n a t i on  d t.  2 6 - 7 - 64 by  T i r oo  P a s hi  . . ..
Do.|
Do.]
Ext.M4  •
Do.J
Do.
Do.
Notice  of  enquiry  issued  to  Tiroo Pashi  by  Enquiring  Officer  dt. 29-7-64  . . ..
Do.
D o/
Statement  of  Tiroo  Paahi
Do.J
Ext.Ms  .
Enquiry  report  dt.  31-7-64
Do.
D0.5
Do-1
Ext.  M6
Office  copy  of  letter  rcg.  termination
Ext.M7  .
of  service  of  SH  Tifoo  Pashi
Do.
Do.
Do.
Ext.MS  . Postal  receipt  filed  by  Tiroo  Pashi during  enquiry  . . ..
Do.
Do,
Do.
Postal  acknowledgement  filed  by  Tiroo
Ext.Mg  .
Pashi  during  enquiry  .
Do.
Do.
Do.
GojSy of  tile  standing  order
Do.
Do.
Do.
E"t.M,io  .

40
List  of  Docwmnt  admitted  in  Evidence for  Workmen
Description  of  document  &  date
Proved  by
Dt.  of admission
Distinguish- ing  mark  or number
Whether admitted or  proved
13-9-67
Extract  of  the  membership  register
Esrt.Wl  .
Proved
WWl for  1963-64
(Sd.)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer,
Central  Govt.  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal,
Dhanbad.
APPENDIX  II
BEFORE  THE  CENTRAL  GOVERNMENT  ADDITIONAL  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL AT  DHANBAD.
REFERENCE  N O.  66  OF  1967
PARTIES:  Employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhowra,  Colliery,
P.O.  Bhowra, Dist.  Dhanbad.
AND
Their  Workmen.
List  of  Witnesses  Examined  for  the  Employers
Name  of  the  witness
Dt.  of  examination '  No,  of  witness
K.  C. Nandkeolyar
13-9-67 M Wi
List  of  Witnesses Examined  for  the  Workmen
No,  of  witness
Name  of  the  witness
Dt.  of  examination
Prasanta  Burnian
.
13-9-67
(Sd)  N.  VENKATA  RAO,
Presiding  Officer,
Central  Govt.  Additional  Industrial  Tribunal, Dhanbad.
 
[No.  2/38/66-HUI.]

New  Delhi,  the  10th  November  1967
S.O.  4110.—In  pursuance  of  section  17  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14 of  1947),  the  Central  Government  hereby  publishes  the  following  award  of  the Indu.it.rial  Tribunal.  Hyderabad,  in  the  industrial  dispute  between  the  employers in  relation  to  the  Singareni  Collieries  Company  Limited,  Belampalli  Group  of Collieries,  Post  Office  Belampalli,  Andhra  Pradesh  and  their  workmen,  which  was received  by  the  Central  Government  on  the  2nd  November  1987.
BEFORE  THE  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL  (C),  ANDHRA  PRADESH, HYDERABAD
PRESENT:
Sri  Mohammad  Najmuddin,  M.A  B.L.,  Chairman,  Industrial  Tribunal, Andhra  Pradesh,  Hyderabad.
INDUSTRIAL  DISPUTE  NO.  53  OP  1966
BETWEEN
Workmen  of  M/s  Singareni  Collieries  Co.  Ltd.,  Belampalli.
AND
Employers  of  M/s  Singareni  Collieries  Co.  Ltd.,  Belampalli  Dvn.
APPKAHANCES:
For  the  workmen—Sri  A.  Raghuramulu,  Vice  President,  Andhra  Pradesh
Colliery  Mazdoor  Sangh  (INTUC),  Kothagudium. For  the  employers—Sri  M.  Shyam  Mohan,  Personnel  Officer.
AWAKD
The  Government  of  India  in  its  Ministry  of  Labour,  Employment  and  Rehabi- litation  (Department  of  Labour  & Employment)  had,  by  order  No.  7/25/66-LRII dated  5th  November  1966,  referred  this  case  to  me  for  adjudication.  The  issue  as per  schedule  to  the  notification  is  this: —
(I)  Whether  the  punishment  of  dismissal  awarded  to  Shri  B.  Hamulu,  Road Gang  Mazdoor  in  the  Ramakrishnapur  Division,  was  Justified?
(ii)  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?
2.  The  Andhra  Pradesh  Colliery  Mazdoor  Sangh,  Kothagudium,  is  party  to the  reference.  The  statement  of  claims  is  filed  by  and  under  the  signature  of  Mr. S.  Rami  Reddy,  General  Secretary  of  the  Sangh.  The  claimant,  B.  Ramulu,  was a  road  gang  mazdoor  in  the  employ  of  the  Singareni  Collieries  Company  Ltd.  In the  Ramakrishnapur  Division.  On  11th  May  1965  Ramulu  waa  in  the  first  shift working  at  Chamria  building,  that  shift  being  from  7.00  AJVI.  to  3.00  P.M.  While BO,  the  Venus  Engineering  Works,  Contractors,  started  to  unload  polished  Shaha- t>ad  stone  at  the  workspot.  The  Company  charge-sheeted  the  claimant  for  desert- ing  his  workspot  and  assaulting  and  beating  two  persons,  Ramamohanrao  and Seetaramaiah,  who  were  in  charge  of  unloading  Shahabad  stone.  A  domestic enquiry  was  heM.  The  enquiry  officer  held  that  the  charge  was  proved.  There- upon  the  Management  dismissed  Ramulu  by  order  dated  12th  August  1965.  The case  of  the  claimant  is  that  he  did  not  either  desert  his  workspot  or  assault Ramamohanrao  and  Seetaramaiah,  and  that  the  case  was  foisted  upon  him  because of  his  trade  union  activities.  The  particular  motive  for  so  allegedly  foisting the  case  upon  him  is  said  to  be  that  he  had  protested  to  the  Contractors  that  they were  paying  far  less  to  their  own  mazdoors  than  what  should  be  paid.  This  pro- test  is  said  to  have  irritated  the  Contractors,  and  with  the  help  of  the  Manage- mmii  the  case  was  said  to  have  been  foisted  upon  him.  Referring  to  the  domes- tic  enquiry,  it  is  stated  in  the  statement  of  claims  that  the  principles  of  natural justice  and  fair  play  were  not  observed  and  that  Ramulu  did  not  know  that  hap- pened  at  such  an  enquiry.
3.  The  Management  filed  counter  stating  that  the  principles  of  natural  Justice •were  observed  at  the  domestic  enquiry  and  that  Ramulu  was  present  and  had participated  in  it,  but  had  refused  to  cross-examine  the  witnesses  in  support  of the  charge.
i
 
4.  Three  witnesses  were  examined  on  the  side  of  the  claimant,  they  being WiWs.  1,  2  and  3, W.W.  3 being  Ramulu  himself.  Exs.  W  1 ti?  W  3  were  marked

L* 4 4 68
'.
i
•
- * " • '•
'
•  1 8 .'
* '.  •
'
on  his  side.  Two  witnesses,  M.Ws,  1  and  2,  were  examined  on  the  side  of  the Management,  M.W-  2  being  Ramamohanarao  who  was  said  to  be  one  of  the  two who  were  assaulted  by  B.  Ramulu  on  the  forenoon  of  11th  May  1965.  Exs.  M  1 tff M  3  were  marked  on  the  side  of  the  Management.
5.  Now  that  the  question  of  dismissal  of  B,  Ramulu,  following  an  earlier domestic  enquiry,  has  come  here  as  an  Industrial  Dispute,  the  matter  would  be  at large  before  me  and  the  issue  would  be  decided  on  merits,  "there  is  evidence not  only  let  in  at  the  domestic  enquiry  but  also  in  the  enquiry  in  the  Tribunal. The  evidence  should  be  judged  as  a  whole.  But  it  must  be  stated  that  there should  be  a  compelling  reason  for  not  accenting  the  evidence  let  in  at  the  domestic- enquiry  and  the  report  made  by  the  enquiry  officer.
6-  WW.  1, Chilumuia  Durgalah.  and  WW.  2,  Gampala  Rajam,  were  in  the  same shifts  as  B.  Ramulu  on  the  afternoon  of  11th  May  1965.  These  two  witnesses attempted  to  give  an  alibi  to  B.  Ramulu.  W.W.  1  said  that  B.  Ramulu  had  left the  workspot  at  11.00  a,m,  along  with  maistry  Nagabhushanam  with  two  inch pipes  for  fitting  at  the  B  class  quarters.  The  witness  said  that  any  contractors' lorries  did  not  arrive  at  the  Chamria  building,  that  any  disturbance  did  not  tak" place  there  and  that  there  Was  no  beating  of  anybody  there.  W.W.  2,  GjOmpala Rajam,  also  said  that  there  was  no  incident  of  any  kind,  that  any  lorries  of contractors  did  not  come  there  and  that  nobody  was  assaulted.  These  two witnesses  were  examined  at  the  domestic  enquiry.  W.W.  1 stated  there  that  "some quarrel  happened"  at  the  Chamria  building  under  construction  and  that  B. Ramulu  had  left  his  working  place  after  the  quarrel  started.  The  witness,  hoW* ever,  said  that  he  did  not  know  about  the  details.  W.W.  2  said  at  the  domestic- enquiry  that  an  incident  had  taken  place,  but  like  the  other  witness  he  too  avoid- ed  mentioning  B.  Ramulu  having  participated  in  it.  These  two  witnesses  were summoned  as  witnesses  for  Ramulu  at  the  domestic  enquiry,  and  they  were- examined  by  the  Management.  But  it  will  be  particularly  noticed  that  while  at the  domestic  enquiry  W.Ws.  1  and  2  admitted  to  the  occurrence,  they  would  not admit  that  from  the  witness  box  in  the  enquiry  in  the  Tribunal.  B  Ramulu. W.W,  3, testifying!  here  on  his  own  behalf  said  that  he  did  not  see  any  contractors' lorries  coming  to  the  Chamria  building,  that  any  incident  did  not  take  place  and that  therefore  there  was  no  question  of  his  participating  in  any  such  incident. His  statement  was  recorded  in  the  domestic  enquiry.  There  he  stated  that  when at  about  11.00  a.m.  he  was  working  near  the  B-Class  quarters  some  quarrel  haa taken  place  near  the  Chamria  building  under  construction  and  that  ne  did  not know  the  details  regarding  the  same.  He  denied  that  he  had  participated  in  any- such  quarrel.
 
7.  Having  regard  to  the  positive  testimony  let  in  the  Tribunal,  I  am  not  pre- pared  to  accept  the  testimony  of  W.Ws.  1,  i  and  3.  Here  in  the  Tribunal  they Went  to  the1  extent  of  Baying  that  not  to  speak  of  any  incident  taking  place,  even the  contractors'  lorries  had  not  arrived  at  the  Chamria  buildings  for  unloading Shahabad  stone.  Claiming  that  he  was  not  allowed  to  participate  in  the  domestic- enquiry,  W.W.  3  said  hferfc  in  the  Tribunal  that  he  was  not  allowed  to  come  inside the  roorrt  where  the  domestic  enquiry  was  taking  place  and  that  he  was  made  ta- sk  outside.  I  do  not  believe  that  statement.  M.W.  1,  Avadhani,  who  is  a  Typist In  the  Agent's  6ffice  6t  the  Ramakrishnapur  Division,  stated  that  he  was  present At  the  domestic  enquiry  as  well  as  B.  Ramulu  and  that  he  had  seen  B.  Ramulu. putting  his  thumb  Impressions  on  the  statements  recorder  at  the  domestic  enquiry. Seeing  that  B.  Ratnulu  clairhfr  to  be  ari  active  member  of  the  trade  union,  I  do tibt  think  that  he  would  sit  outside  cooling  his  heels  While  the  domestic  enquiry regafding  him  was  in  progress  iftSide  the  room.  B  Anjaneyulu,  a  partner  in +he  Venus  Engineering  works,  gave  evidence  at  the  domestic  enquiry.  He  said there  that  he  was  supervising  unloading  Of  Shahabad  stone  on  11th  May  1065' near  the  Chamria  buildings,  that  Ramamohanarao  and  Seetaramaiah,  Supervisors,, were  present,  that  a  quarrel  developed  about  the  quantum  of  wages  paid  to  the hlaZd&oTs  employed  by  the  Contractors,  and  that,  while  so,  B.  Ramulu  came  up tad.  beat  ftamamoh&narao  and  Seetaranialah.  The  enquiry  officer  recorded  that B- fi&mulu had  declined  to  cross-'eJta'mlne  trie  witness.  There  is  the  thumb  impres- sion  6i  B. Ramulu  at  the  end  of  the  statement  of  this  witness.  Both  Seetaramaiab. and  Ramamohanarao  were  examined  at  the  domestic  enquiry.  SeetSrahiHiah said  there  that  when  he  attempted  to  prevent  Ramulu  from  beating  Rama- inohanatfio  flirther,  Ramulu  tufned  unon  him.  and  beat  Uporj  his  shoulder  and  be- Ioi*  the  neek.  The  testimony  of  the  other  victim,  Ramamohanarao,  at  the  domestic- •inquiry  is  the  dame.  At  the  end  of  the  statements  of  these  two  witnesses  the enquiry  officer  made  a  note  that  Ramulu  declined  to  cross-examine  the  witness. In  both  those  statements  there  is  the  thumb  impression  of  B.  Ramulu.  Rama- mohanarao  was  examined  as  M.W..  2  in  the  Tribunal.  He  said  that  while  the partner  of  the  Venus  Engineering  Works  was  unloading  Shahabad  *tone  at  the-

SEC.  3
Chamria  buildings  from  two  lorries,  some  persons  came  and  prevented  unloading of  the  lorries,  that  while  Anjaneyulu  was  reguesting  them  not  to  cause  obstruc- tion,  B.  Ramulu  and  two  or  three  others  who  were  working  near  the  B-type quarters  came  running  from  there  and  =:njck  him  (witness)  with  hands  on  the back  and  neck  and  that  when  Seetarairr-^rh  tried  to  prevent  the  beating,  B. Ramulu  meted  out  similar  treatment  to  tht  latter.
8.  I  do  not  see  any  reason  why  I  should  not  accept  the  testimony  of  Rama- mohanarao,  M.W.  2,  given  here  and  his  testimony  a"  well  as  of  Seetaramaiah  and Anjaneyulu  given  at  the  domestic  enquiry.  I  have  no  doubt  that  B.  Ramulu had  participated  in  the  domestic  enquiry  although  he  had  declined  to  cross- examine  the  Management's  witnesses  there.  At  the  end  of  chief  examination  here, B.  Ramulu  (W.W.  3)  said  that  he  had  been  telling  the  Contractors  that  they  were paying  to  their  ma.adoors  far  less  than  what  should  be  paid  and  that  thereupon the  Contractors  got  angry  with  him.  It  is  clear  from  this  that  B.  Ramulu  was interested  in  the  quantum  of  wages  paid  bv  the  Contractors  to  the  mazdoors,  and that  he  had  been  in  the  habit  of  telling  the  Contractors  about  it.  Then  a  time came  when  he  took  Ihe  situation  into  his  own  hands  bv  assaulting  two  of  the contractors'  supervisors.  Ratnamohanarao  and  Seelaramaiah.  He  claims  to  be an  active  member  of  the  Trade  Union.  Great  piav  was  being  made  of  the  fact that  the  B-type  quarters  are  differently  situated  from  the  Chamria  building  where the  lorries  were  unloading  Shahabad  stone  It  is  admitted  that  the  B-type Quarters  are  adjacent  to  the  Chamria  buildings.  So.  it  really  matters  little  whether at  the  time  of  the  occurrence  B.  Ramulu  v:aa  working  at  the  Chamria  building  or at  the  B-type  quarters.
9.  I  am  satisfied  that  the  domestic  enquiry  was  fa;r  and  above  board,  that principles  of  natural  justice  and  fair  play  were  not  violated,  and  that  B.  Ramulu had  participated  in  it.  The  enquiry  officer  could  certainly  come  to  the  conclusion he  did  basing  it  upon  the  positive  testimony  given  by  Anjaneyulu,  Seetaramaiah and  Ramamohanarao  at  the  domestic  enoniry.  There  is  no  "reason  whatsoever why  I  should  disagree  with  him.  The  tesiirnonv  given  at  the  Tribunal  by  Rama- mohanarao  (M.W.  2)  supports  the  r-ositive  testimony  given  at  the  domestic enquiry.  The  testimony  given  hereby  W.Ws.  1.  2  tind  3  makes  a  feeble  attempt at  alibi,  and  that  attempt  turns  cut  to  be  wholly  inadequate.  It  is  clear  beyond doubl  that  B.  Remuhi  had  assaulted  Seetaramaiah  ar.d  Ramamohanarao  on  the forenoon  of  11th  May  1965  while  they  were  attending  to  the  unloading  of  the Contractors'  lorries  at  the  Cham-is  hiijklrne-.  R.  Br>mulu  certainly  deserved  to be  punished  for  that.  But  the  question  is  whe'hfr  the  punishment  of  dismissal was  merited.  I  should  say  it  was.  It  is  a  very  seriou--  thing  what  B.  Ramulu had  done  by  assaulting  the  employee^  of  the  Contractors  when  they  were  unload- ing  Shahabad  stone  from  lorries  at  the  Ch^vi-ia  buildinas  under  construction  by the  Company.  Ramulu  may  feel  that  the  Contractors  were  under-paying  their mazdoors,  but  that  is  no  justification  for  assaulting  the  employees  of  the  Contrac- tors.  The  punishment  of  dismissal  was  justified-  There  is  no  relief  to  be  given in  this  behalf  to  B.  Ramulu.
Award  passed  accordingly.
Given  under  my  hand  and  the  sea]  of  the  Tribunal,  this  the  23rd  day  of October,  1967.
(Sd.)  M.  NAJMUDDIN,
Industrial  Tribunal.
APPFNDTX  OF  EVTDFNC1;
Witnesses  examined  for:
Workmen : —
Employers: —
W.W.  1:  C.  Durgiah.  M.W.  J:  K.  L.  N.  Avadhani.
W.W.  2:  G.  Rajam.  M.W.  2:  K.  Ramamohanarao.
W.W.  3:  B.  Ramulu.
Documents  exhibited  for VJorkmen
Ex.  Wl :  Burvh  of  document?  filed  by  the  Utv.-m.  viz..  FIR  f'led  by  the  Police in  Munoif  Magistrate  Court  with  material  papers  as  enclosures  to  it.
Ex.  W2:  Application  of  the  workman  submitted  to  the  Agent  of  the  Singareni Collieries  Co.  Ltd.,  Kcthagiuiium.
Ex-  W3:  Correspondence  between  0~e.  Uni-ni  "nrl  flip  Ministry  of  Labour, Employment  and  Rehabilitation,  Government  of  India,  in  the  matter of  B.  Ramulu,  who  was  •lismissrd  for  certain  misconduct.

Documentr.  exhibited  for Employers
Ex.  Ml  Identity  Service  Card  of B. Ramulu. Ex.  M2:  Domestic  enquiry  file. Ex,  M3:  Appeal  dated  Hth  August  1985 of B.  Ramulu  submitted  to the  General Manager  of the Collieries  praying  to cancel  the dismissal  order. <'Sd-) M. NAJMUDDIN,
Industrial  Tribunal. [No.  7/25/66-LRII.] S.O  4111.—In  puisuanco  oi tuy\um  17 o< iht- Industrial  Diswixs  Ad.  1947 (14 of  1947).,  the Central  Governmcrt  hereby  publishes  the following  award  of  the Industrial  Tribunal,  Hyderabad,  in -.he  industrial  dispute  between  the employers in  relation  to the Singareni  Collier''  '"* -.v •  V—>ited.  Rurirampur  Division, Post  Office  Kothagudium  Collieries  !  .i ...i:  •...  '•-<.:  and  their  workmen,  which was  received  by the Central  Government  on •,>". 3rd  November,  1967.
BEFORE  THE  INDUSTRIAL  TRIBUNAL  (C).  ANDHRA  PRADESH,
HYDERABAD.
PRESENT:
Sri  Mohammad  Najmuddin.  M.A., B.L.  Chairman,  Industrial  Tribunal, Andhra  Preaesh,  Hyderabad.
INDUSTRIAL  DISPUTE  1\>.  9 OF  1967.
j < . - :: I - - I - - . I <:  . . . ..  r  ' • • • • • .:  •
ANT)
Emplc  .  - <3  .  " . " ' > r i es  C-.imjj'ir'y  Ltd.,  Rudrampur  Division,  P.O.
APPEARANCES :
S ri  K  G- KaiWLi'-'ii'an.  C o n i n e!  --+->:•  <;i,  iY .•'"::.', e. .
M e s s rs  K. Sr:riiv.:..-;aij>u.ri h\  . . j r' p. ','  ';, • :c.'  • n d r a f T i o.  iVvif-ionril  P e r s o n n el O / f i c er  of  i he  Cc.-.\i\'.,'-'  -i'^r  ;!;  •• ,  ;)'-•"(.-s-
T he  G o v e r n m e nt  of  I n d ia  m  i i?  y i i - n i - .r  ,  • • ,[  \ , ?b  M  E m p l o y m e nt  a nd  R e h a b i l i.
tation  CDeparimeTjt  vl Lar.-.'ii:' i id  E I T I / O;  :.~-\rt)  h-~-_ by order  F. No. 7/t\/67-LRIl dated  5th April.  ic)n7  v"ic:'t.'  if],; in •.'- r  idiUfHi'ii.-'un  The  issues as per  schedule  annex-;-!  fi- :'r>  i".riific.'ion  •••. ''i^--°  -
(i)  Whether  the action  •• J the m.'jn~>:-"e;.-i?">t  .•" Sigareni  CoV.lr.rifs  Company Limited  in ti-rmiryti'iy  toe •••"% ;•.*"=  c  Shri  Koiyada  Gptiaiah,  Coai filler,  Gan-  TTo 20  ]r-rv.>e  ?*..•.  '1. was iustified?
(ii)  Jf na+  to v / ht  .••lll'e-f  :;. tho ^v,r.->rn;.r  enUiled?
2.  T he  S i r i t f a r p iu  C ' - 'i  • ' n - ?f  . ' .;  i.  •  ' ••  L  S'  *  *:  '  '  i " ' - . ' t \*  In  t j i-  ^'  . . . • • • i - - n ->  T he  j ' l a i t1
m e n!  of c l a i m:  }-;  filed  ) .  ..-K.-  ; ;r: n e-  t he S '' .. '.'. r.  f J ! v. S. K.  S ' i i i h f - f c . ^,  G e n t i ai S e c r e l r i rv  o:" i no  S y n g is  Ti.r- c'.^hiui'it.  TI •- u:-  • . • . . ' ^ • ; . -,  v ^ -- r" c-,-:_T  Slier  u\ Ts1-".
5  I n c l i n e.  W h i 'e  he  ' v -v  on  d u ty  on  t he  ;  ' . • - :'  J I :,  •'  3 . ' . ,'  J c ' . i i T J ' vy  I ' - M i fi  a  p i e ce  oi c o ai  f r om  r.  h e ; ip  of  • • ••  :  V s . :1  on  h ^s  . ' ] " . " "'  .  "^  . ;'  i  i  i  ; i ~ > r r - <'  i;  ;" i:-  ".  T I?  n h n i t t o rf as  i n - p a t i t i tt  in  t he  C H T C M CS  H r ^ p i tm  n , .d  :  'J  i re  ' , • • :!  • "-  r  t ; :e  i n j u r y,  it  \ v a ."  f o u i ) - , -.
t h at  t h e re  w t 'F  f r a c t u ;^  T he  i i - L K - 1 ' . j - . -c  ' . - • ••  " . ;t  b u ".  u ' ^ ' n - i ^ - i iv  i he  t h ' . u nb  h ad  to
!
be  a m p u t a t ed  c u t!  a  IV  " i i e : .l  T ? < : : b - : p i - e s i . l;  •:  o v er  by  ' ho  C h i ef  S ; p - f t c on  &  ? , ' I r d v i '!
Officer  of t he  S i g n a r e ri  CollievJes:  .i^claro,1  20 pi r  . c . ;i ki.-.x  r:' I'fTieiency  i i.  t he w o r k e r.  T h e r e u p on  t he  C o m p a nv  p a id  h ' r .i c,-nirons:.rii>r>  v;'d._T  -'he  v/orkrnen"s C o m p e n s a t i on  A ct a nd terminate-:!  h is  s c r i - k e ^.  T he >.ic.Sif  !  •'i'Jcf-r  \^h'> '.vas  /n c h a r ge  oi t he  Lci3i.,py  Ciinii-  i-: 'h •  Ir":-.;!i'\;',  p-ou-'-jr.:  ,1 ;:. -  ^..itai.-.h  \v;:s  also sufferinR"  f r om  leprosv.  It '><."P;:  Knottier  r(-a':on  w hv '>is ^.eivlct";  v c re  :e r i n i i i a t e d. T he  case  in t he  stniciri"r(  .">•' ('"iai'ii^  -> tK'--t  GattHi;-;:-  w
1
i r
k i nd  of  I t p r o sv  a nd  * ' ; • - ;'  C \ r " >~  ' - " re  , ho  .-  I QT  ' e r r . 'i  : ••  u . - ,'  r ,-  , ' " \ : i o f or  r e a s on
 
of  t he  i n j u ry  to tlun.Vo  "va?  ' , " ; i ' -'  , ni iite!;,:1.  T.  -.Ui5;'O'-t  r-1  ; re  r-.,-nipp.lion  t h at G a t t a i ah  w as n ot  s u f f e r m ;,  i r o ni  ;e'pn;s>  r e l i a i n ;-  v-  \.-\v;\'  : u ', ,  •> :

M-.  .  ".'it)|  I'll!-'  G A / K I " J 'K  Of''  I M M A.  NOVF.MKFK  18,  !(.)ii7/K  \R  f IK  \  27,  18*9  ^ \x
3.  The  Management  filed  counter  to  say  that  amputation  of  the  thumb  was necessitated  by  reason  ol! the  injury  and  that  moreover  Gattaiah  was  also  suffering from  leprosy.  The  counter  proceeds  to  state  that  on  a  subsequent  verification the  Superintendent  of  the  Leprosy  Hospital  at  Ditchpalle  clarified  that  Gattaiah had  leprosy  although  not  of  a  communicable  type.
4.  The  Management  examinee,  one  wiuioss  M.W.  1.  lie  is  Dr  M.  Munuswamy who  is  Ihe  Cbid  Su.-gcon  sr'::  W.e'-'i'ul  Office  of  the  Company.  Exs.  Ml  to  M7  were marked  mi  its  side.  One  vit:v:--s  -•••-.?. e.-ar.^icd  ss  W.\V.  1 on  the,  side  of  the  clai- mant.  He  is  Dr.  P.  S.  Samuel.  SuDevitii.ei-.deut,  Victoria  Leprosy  Hospital,  Ditch- palle.  Ex.  Ml  i>  the  ea&c- i-he.. • in  respe.v  yf  Gatiaiah.  Dr.  Manusvomy  (M.W.  1) testified  with  iho  aia  of  this  docuirsisnt.  Hi;; testimony  is  this  Gnttaiab.  reported  at the  Hospital  at  Kothagudium  on  31st  January,  1986.  The  duty  Medical  Officer examined  him  for  a  history  ot  injury  to  the  Tight  thumb.  On  X-ray  examina- tion  it  was  found  that  in  addition  to  the  soft  xi&sue  injury,  there  was  fracture  of the  phalanx  of  ihc  ri^M  thumb.  He  was  treated,  by  the  usual  method  and  the fracture  was  set.  As  the  treatment  v.Tas  m  progress  it  was  found  that  there  was gangarene,  meaning  death  of  the  tissue.  The  general  examination  of  the  patient revealed  that  he  wes  sufferine  from  leprosy.  He  was  also  siven  anti-leprosy  treat- ment.  The  witness  reviewed  the  cane  of  the  patient  on  10th  March,  1966.  He decided  upon  removal  of  the  thumb  at  the  joint.  That  operation  was  done  on 10th  itself  of  March.  Dr.  Munuswamj  rim'-elf  had  done  it.  The  post-operative period  was  uneventful  A'j Gattaiah  had  !
5.  The  Medical  Board  of  the  Company  did  not  send  Gattaiah  to  any  other institution,  the  Victoria  J.eprosy  Hospital,  Ditchpalle,  for  instance,  either  for examination  or  for  further  treatment.  The  Union  had  taken  upon  itself  to canvass  further  opinion  on  the  subject,  and  sent  Gattaish  to  the  Hospi- tal  at  Ditchpalle.  Dr.  Samuel  who  is  the  Superintendent  there  gave  a  letter  to the  Union  saving  that  Gadaiah  was  not  suffering  from  Hanson's  disease  "at  pre- sent".  Enclosing  that  letter  from  Dr.  Samuel  the  Union  made  a  further  represen- tation  to  the  Company  in  respect  of  Gattaiah.  Thereupon  the  Chief  Surgeon  & Medical  Officer  of  the  Company  v/ro>p  to  Dr.  Samuel  to  clarify  his  opinion  'and asking  if  any  test  was  made  by  what  is  called  the  concentratu.'i  method.  To  that Dr.  Samuel  replied  that  there  were  symptoms  of  leprosy  in  Gattaiah,  although that  was  not  of  a  communicable  type.  Ar,  to  why  in  his  earlier  letter  given  to the  Union  he  said  that  Gattaiah  was  not  suiTering  from  Hanson's  rUssad-?, Dr.  Samuel said  that  he  did  not  want  to  tell  Gattaiah  that  he  was  having  such  a  disease  lest he  should  get  a  shock  from  such  information.
 
6.  Dr.  Samuel  was  examined  as  witness  for  the  claimant.  He  admitted  that he  had  given  the  earlier  letter  to  the  Union  and  also  that  he  had  sent  a  further clarification  to  Dr.  Munuswamy,  the  latter  document  being  Ex.  M7.  On  a  reading of  it,  it  is  seen  that  what  Dr.  Samuel  has  said  really  amounts  to  saying  that  Gat- taiah  was  suffering  from  leprosy.  When  he  came  into  the  witness  box  Dr.  Samuel rather  confused  himself  and  ended  up  by  saying  that  the  Gattaiah  he  had  earlier examined  at  the  Hospital  at  Ditchpalle  WBS  fair  and  tall  but  not  short  and  dark like  the  Gattaiah  who  was  present  before  him  in  the  Tribunal  and  who  is  the claimant  in  the  case.  Dr.  Samuel  said  that  he  had  examined  the  Gattaiah  in  this case  in  the  precincts  of  the  Tribunal  just  before  he  entered  the  witness  box  and that  he  was  not  suffering  from  leprosy.  Surely,  that  sort  of  opinion  cannot  have any  value  as  against  clinical  examination  in  Companv's  hospital  where  the  Medical Officer  in  charge  of  the  Leprosy  Clinic  had  definitely  certified  that  Gattaiah  was suffering  from  leprosy.  Had  Gattaiah  not  been  suffering  from  leprosy  the  prog- nosis  of  the  treatment  given  to  him  in  the  hospital  of  the  Company  would  cer- tainly  have  been  satisfactory,  and  the  Chief  Medical  Officer  of  the  Compay  would not  have  decideci  upon  amputation  of  the  thumb.  The  opinion  of  the  Medical  Board of  the  Company  backed  by  the  testimony  of  Dr.  Munuswamy  (M.W.I)  should certainly  be  preferred  to  that  of  Dr.  Samuel  whose  testimony  was,  I  must  say, unsatisfactory.  And  once  the  thumb  was  amputated  and  there  was  loss  of  20  per cent  efficiency,  the  Management  could  certainly  dispense  with  the  services  of  Gat- taiah.  Any  employer  cannot  be  compelled  to  retain  the  services  of  the  worker who  has  lost  his  efficiency.  Having  regard  to  the  clear  testimony  given  by  Dr. Munuswamy,  .there  is  no  question  of  Gattaiah's  discharge  from  service  for  the above  said  reason  being  either  illegal  or  unjustified.  Therefore  it  follows  that

441,2  JHE  GAZETTE  OF  INDIA:  NOVEMBER  IP,  1967/KARTIKA  '47,  1889  [PARI  l i-
the  claimant,  Gattaiah,  is  not  entitled  to  any  relief-  His  discharge  from  service was  justified.  The  issue  is  found  against  him.
AWARD  passed  accordingly. Given  under  my  hand  and  the  seal  of  the  Tribunal,  this  the  21st  day  of  October.
1967.
(Sd-)  M.  NAJMUDDtN, Industrial  Tribunal.
ApritNuix  OF  EVIDENCE Witnesses  examined  for:
Workjnen:—
Employers: —
W.W.  1:  Dr.  P.  S-  Samuel.  M.W-  1:  Dr.  Munuswamy
Documents  exhibited  for  Workmen:
Ex.  Wl.—Letter  dated  7tli  December,  1966  from  Dr.  Samuel  of  Victoria Leprosy  Hospital,  Ditchpalle,  addressed  to  Sri  K.  S.  Srinivasan. General  Secretary  of  the  Union  stating  that  the  workman  is  free  from infection  and  he  can  continue  to  work  at  the  collieries.
Documents  exhibited  for  Employers:
Ex.  Ml.—Case  sheet  of  K.  Gattaiah  maintained  by  the  Hospital. Ex.  M'2.—Report ot  the  Medical  Board  dated  30th  April,  1967  confirming that  the  workman  Gattainh  is  suffering  from  leprosy.
Ex.  M3.—Report  of  the  Chief  Surgeon  & Medical  Officer  of  Collieries  dated 30th  April,  1960  stating  that  Gattaiah  is  unfit  for  further  service  due to  leprosy.
Ex.  JVT4.—Letter  dated  26th  July,  1966  from  the  Gentrul  Secretary  of  the Sanfjh  addressed  to  the  company  on  the  illegal  termination  of  the services  of  Gattaiah.
Ex.  M5-—Copy of  letter  dated  2fith  .luly,  I960 from  the  Superintendent,  V-L.H. Ditchpalle  addressed  10  the  General  Socretary  of  the  Sangh  stating that  Gattaialj  is  not  suffering  from  Hanson's  disease  at  present. Ex.  M6.—Letter  dated  23rd  August,  1966  from  the  Chief  Superintendent  & Medical  Officer  of  the  Company  addressed  to  Dr.  Samuel  asking  for clarification  whether  Gattaiah  was  suffering  from  leprosy  or  not. Ex.  Ml.—Copy  of  letter  dated  Nil  from  Dr.  Samuel  in  reply  to  the  above letter,  Ex.  M6.
(Sd.)  M.  NAJMUDDIN,
Industrial  Tribunal, [No.  7/6/67-LRII,]
ORDERS
NL'W  Delhi,  the  dth  November  1967
S-O.  4112-—Whereas  the  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial dispute  exists  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  management  of  Kharkharee Colliery  of  Messrs  Bharat  Mining  Corporation  Limited  and  their  workmen  in  respect of  the  matters  specified  in  the  Schedule  hereto  annexed;
And,  whereas  the  Central  Government  considers  it  desirable  to 'refer  the  said dispute  for  adjudication;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  puwers  conferred  by  clause  (d)  of  sub-sec- tion  (1)  of  section  10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14  of  1947),  the  Central Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  adjudication  to  the  Industrial  Tri- bunal,  Dhanbad,  constituted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Art.
SCHEDULE
Whether  the  action  of  the  management  of  Kharkharee  Colliery  of  Messrs Bharat  Mining  Corporation  Limited,  Post  Office  Kharkharee,  District Dhanbad  in  traiir.ferrinK  Shri  Lachhaman  Mahato,  Prop  Mistry,  from Kharkharee  Colliery  lo  Babisolo  Colliery,  ride  management's  letter dated  18th  April,  1967, amounts  lo  victimisation?  If  so,  to  what  relief Is  the  workman  entitled?
 
LNo.  2/120/"7-LR-,II.]

SEC.  3(ii)J  THE  GA/JiTIE  Ol-  INDIA:  MAEAtBLR  IS.  1%7/KAK 1  IKA  U7,  188'J  44!^
S.O.  4113.—Whereas  tha  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial ? JS^,  T?x i s.ts  between  the  employers  in  xelation  to  the  Model  -Thaiia  Colliery  of Model  Jhana  Colliery  Company,  Post  Office  Jbaria,  District  Uh'nh-M  ard  their workmen  in  respect  of  the  matters  syeLuisd  in  the  Schedule  hereto  annexed;
And,  whereas  the  Central  Government  considers  it  desirable  to  refer  the  said dispute  for  adjudication;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  clause  (d)  of  sub-s^c- tion  (1)  of  section  10  of  the  industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947 '(14  0^  1947\  the  Central Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  adjudication  to  the  Industrial  Tri- bunal,  Dhanbad.  constituted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether  the  termination  of  service  of  Shri  Manik  ficy.  Surveyor  of  the Model  Jharia  Colliery  of  Model  .Thaiia  Colliery  Company,  Post  Office Jharia,  District  Dhanbad,  with  eiiect  from  the  2Ctb  March,  1967,  is justified?  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?,
LNo-  2/111/67-LR.IL]
S-O.  4114.—Whereas  the  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial dispute  exists  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Bhagaband  Colliery  of  the Borrea  Coal  Company  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the  natters  specified  in  the Schedule  hereto  annexed;
And,  whereas  the  Central  Government  considers  it  desirable  to  rL'fer  the  said dispute  for  adjudication;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  clause  (d)  of  sub-sec- tion  (1)  of  section  10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14  ot  1347),  the  Central Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  adjudication  to  the  Industrial  Tri- bunal,  Dhanbad,  constituted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether  the  management  of  Bhagaband  Colliery  of  the  Borrea  Coal  Com- pany  is  justified  in  dismissing  thoir  workman  Shii  Bishun  Dayal Garari,  Traffic  Sirdar  from  service  vith  effect  from  the  14th  April. 1967?  If  not,  to  what  relief  is  the  workman  entitled?
[No.  2(118)67-LR.II.l
S.O.  4115.—Whereas  the  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial dispute  exists  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  management  of  Bhanora Colliery  of  Messrs  Equitable  Coal  Company  Limited,  P.O.  Dishergarh,  Distt Burdwan,  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the  matters  specified  in  the  Schedule hereto  annexed;
And,  whereas  the  Central  Government  considers  if  desirable  lo  refer  the  said dispute  for  adjudication;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  clause  (d)  of  sub-sec- tion  (1)  of  section  10  of  the  Industrial  Disputes  Act,  1947  (14  of  1947),  the  Central Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  adjudication  to  the  Industrial  Tri- bunal.  Calcutta,  constituted  under  section  7A  of  the  said  Act.
SCHEDULE
(1)  Whether  M/s.  Equitable  Coal  Company  Limited,  P.O.  Dishergarh,  Distt Burdwan  or  Shri  Sahadat  Hossin  are/is  responsible  for  the  employ- ment  in  respect  of  Sarvashri  Bhagqo,  Ram  Asray  and  Prem,  Stone Cutters  of  Bhanora  Colliery?
(2)  Whether  the  aforesaid  Company/Contractor  was  justified  in  stopping  the 3  Stone  Cutters  from  work  with  effect  from  the  19th  July,  1967?  It not  to  what  relief  are  the  workmen  entitled?
LNo.  2/112/67-LR.IL]
SO.  4116.—Whereas  the  Central  Government  is  of  opinion  that  an  industrial dispute  exists  between  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  Model  Jharia  Colliery,  P.O. Jharia  (Dhanbad)  and  their  workmen  in  respect  of  the  matters  specified  in  the Schedule  hereto  annexed;
And.  whereas  the  Central  Government  considers  it  desirable  to  refer  the  said dispute  for  adjudication;

} 4 J4  '  "^  <• \/-K'i'J'I-:  or  I M I M V:  W V K M T . FR  is  1%7/K ^K 1 SK \  ::;.  i sw  | P , \ RI  1 1-
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  power;*  conisi red  by  c'auhe  (di  of  sub-sec- tion  (1)  of  section  10  oi  the  Industrial  Disputes  Aci.  1947  (U  of  1.;H7).  the  Central Government  hereby  refers  the  said  dispute  for  a"indication  to  fh?  Lioi  stiia:  Tri- bunal.  Dhanbad.  constituted  under  sectic>n  ,'A  of  tli?  said  AC.
SCHEDULK
Whether  the  management  o"  Model  Jhariy  CoJiiery  was  justified  in  c'jnv.ina- ting  the  services  of  Shri  Lachhu  "Vonio.  ."Jinsr.  with  effect  / i ^n  the 17th  March.  1967?  If  not.  to  w'r.pj  re dec  is  the  w j / k ^ an  entitled":
jNo.  '>ni4^'67-TE.II.l
BAT,'"- w.''  ^I'^CSJ  I ••  iej  S;-:cy.
(Depai'toseid  of  Labour  and  i^nin'.^isic.ni-
iveiv  Delhi,  t.';e  CUi \~uve,rbe;  1967
S.O.  4117.—In  pursuance  of  Sub-section  (1)  oT  Section  14.  Sssb-sectio'i  (1)  ot Section  15,  Sections  16,  17  and  18  oi  the  Persona]  Injuries  (Compensation  Insur- ance)  Act,  1963  (37  of  1963),  the  Central  Govarnment  hereby  authorises  the  Assisr- ant  Commissioner  of  Labour  (Administration).  Hyderabad  ID exercise  the  powers under  Sections  14, 15, 16, 17 nnd  !8  or  the  said  Act  Throughout  the  Stci/j  of  Andhra Pradesh.
[No.  3/4(1/ SitrSpl-i^c  II.]
P.  SADAGOPA-T,  Dv.  Secy.
(Department  of  Labour  and  Eoioloynient)
Neio  Delhi,  the  6th  November  1987
S.O.  4118-—Whereas  it  appears  to  the  Central  Government  t-iat  the  employer and  the  majority  of  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  establishment  known  as Messrs  Shree  Ganesh  Dyeing  and  Textiles  Piocessing  Company,  Reghunattipura, Old  Rice  Mill  Compound.  Surat-3  have  agreed  that  the  provision?,  of  the  Employees Provident  Funds  Act,  1952  (19  of  1952).  shouM  be  m de  appiicab!':  1o  the  sa)d establishment;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  oi  the  powers  conferred  by  sr'1?-section  (41  of  sec- tion  1  of  the  said  Act,  the  Central  Government  hereby  applies  the  provisions  oi the  said  Act  to  the  said  establishment.
This  Notification  shall  be  deemed  to  have  come  into  force  on  the  31st  day  of August,  1967-
[No.  8/146/67-PF.IL]
S.O.  4119.—Whereas  it  appears  to  the  Central  Government  that  the  employer and  the  majority  of  the  employers  in  relation  to  the  establishment  known  as Messrs  Paramount  Commercial  Corporation  Private  Limited,  Prospect  Chambers Annexe  317-321,  Dr.  D.  N.  Road.  Bombay  have  agreed  that  the  provisions  of  the Employees'  Provident  Funds  Act.  1952  (19  of  1952),  should  be  made  applicable  to the  said  establishment;
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  sub-section  <-P>  oi  sec- tion  1  of  the  said  Act,  the  Central  Government  hereby  applies  the  provisions  of the  said  Act  to  the  said  establishment.
This  Notification  shall  be  deemed  to  have  come  into  fore?  on  the  31st  day  of July,  1967-
LNo.  8/147/67/PF.II.J
New  Delhi,  the  8th  November  1967
S.O.  4126.—Whereas  it  appears  to  the  Central  Government  that  the  employer and  the  majority  of  the  employees  in  relation  to  the  establishment  known  as Messrs  Raja  Industrial  Corporation  (Private)  Limited-  13, Gan?sh  Chandra  Avenue, Calcutta-1,  have  agreed  that  the  provisions  of  the  Employees'  Provident  Funds  Act, 1952  (19  of  1952),  should  be  made  applicable  to  the  said  establishment;

Hx.  :,(u)i  I l li  GA/ETTE  OF  INDIA : \OVEAiBER  li>. I9(w .'JOR'I  IKA  21,  1S"9 4415
Now,  therefore,  in exercise  of the powers  conferred  by sub-section  (4) of sec- fion  1 oi the said  Act.  the Centra*  Government  hereby  applies  the provisions of She  said  Act  to the  paid  estabiismnent.
This  notification  shall  be deemed to have  .'one  into  force  on the  31st  day of August 19-61
!N(j.  3/145/67/PF-IL]
New  D< M, the Qlk  N-ujeviber  1967
(No.  F. 13(18)/07-HI.l
.Y<.'j--  r)'.?'"(:,  "?ie  10f-':  -V,;rCf?i(3f,"  1967
^•O.  4:2?—W;"ert'a!.;  3••  rr.pc•'!"£.  to :h<  C-'-titral  Governm--n!  t h at  t he e m p l o y er -11,!  "Mi-?  fjaj'jri+y  •": ;•>:• - ..',;- ov. r-,-  :•; t  :,^r: ;ii t"  t ' -e e,j''^b':r.hinent  k n o wn as Mnssr,'.;  S ha  lthJn  '!i  ."^-:..''•.-.  Kof-ani;-noa.  K u n n a r n b e na  P .O  1S.  W y n ^ d ).  K o z h i- '••'  n _'  .•;•' 1:!52:,  -'• ':•>!  rip Ma-je  r.Fjp'i.Tb'e  (c. the  s a id
N C V,  t h c i T - i f r i - -.  i ji  t _ \ ( ) " c : -:'  i .f  f i ~"  t ; • , . - ,•  e r f-  ( " " i / i l i T t r ri  by  " u o - s e c t : on  ( -O  of  s e c-
io")  i of the,  "a''.:  A-'I,  Hie  •"f-:'".ti.4"  G r v r r n m e i ii  hereby  a p ; / ' tv  t he piovisions of ,'n.'  .•;-:,'1-:jLJislst'ic-riT
This  i:otificat'oa  si oil  };•'-  deerr.ed  fc  bnvc  o i.e  :>ito  i'. rce  on t he  :!Oth  day of St-nlember.  !0B7.
[No.  8 / 1 5 4 / 6 7 - P F . I L]
o=K  •*ir?3—  W ' e ; v as  if apoear;.  to t bc Centra!  Government  t h at  t he employer .vnl  ; ao 'i"j-"i;r,-;ty  ; ihc • sipic^ees  n1 '".Lc^i'n.  u>  tiie  esrabiishinent  k n o wn as '.•-,'-:"s  Bn r.v: r.'(> >k.?  '"j^or.r-y,  ?-B.  :':;ir.-'m  fir.,  c,  :Jaicutta-l,  h a ve  agreed  t h at •I.e  pro\iji:.-!o  <-!  the -inpioyt-:^  P r n v i a e nr  Fund',  Ac-(,  1951!  (19  of 1952)  should be •;f:de  C" !}")'• -able  >o t he p;rrJ  c ^'..iblJsh-iU'P/:
N T A ".  t h e r e .1- ••  • ••  ; - - : • : ? * - - ?e  of  f hf  v!' ' " - 'e rs  c"  / • ? ' • - :'  r  \i  bv  s ; ; b - s e t - t i on  ( 4)  of  s e c- rit'P  I  i 'J  t he  ; . . ' ! •!  A - 't  •'  -  " : '; ir ,:  i  - T ' C" r r r i en  / - e r e '1?  a p p i i r - .?  t he  p r o v i s i o ns  of
T h is  r - i T ' i c a t i ^ 'i  ;''.'. •;. i--1 f'3'-.-\)f-:  to  i^Pve  . ' ) .^  ,\it')  f r r re  on t he 3 0 th  d ay  of - - r a ' - ' r - . b ' T.  .:"G7.
' No  8 / i 5 S ' ' f - 7 - P F . I I .]
;"  C)  ' ' ? • :'  ? .-  - ' - • /1  ' ; r > v .s  ic  . ^ jr  n rs  to  ! ' nc'  ( " I I I T J!  G t ^ e r n ' n c nt  t h at  t he  e m p l o y er ' - - ' " ! . • " - ' " - - • : - - "*  ' •'  i"  i n t ' o ',  f"  . " be  e s t n h ' i s h m e nt  k n o wn  as l fJ " ' ; . 'p  ' -r'3|  • - • : ; .-  .-  : hc
''.^'  t i "c, ; . - - . v-  r - v v.  ' - . ' .I  " ' - ' " ! • • < ; ; . • : . •.  • >.  . : ' - " >r1  T  - V >.  t  i j ^ -i  i - ' - r i ' i a ry  L i n . i l e d.  , 1 / 2.  F a k ir  De - " " " , , . " ' , - " • , " . " . - • ) , . - ; • "•  L : ,"  ••  .  • :*  * \ - ?:  ">  v  '  - v ; > . - • ' . • ' •;  ; , {.  ( I .:  [ ' n p l e v c e s'  P r o v i d e nt r ,:
':'••;  l u . - a - i le  ;o  t l to  s : . . id  e s t a b l i s h m e n t; L' , ' ,,  ;.  , sc-  ~ f , ~ y ^ ' : -"  •  ^'  i ' Y ; ; :\  •='>.  o \ i \'  '  ••  . . i . -J. .'
T , -, , ,.  i  - -•  . " . - , - ,-  - ; .•  , - • - - . - ••  . ,•  ' .'  " "•  'A
-T \-  • .'  1 ' l . t ! " . ' •]  " .v  s u b - ,  •  ' ; , v.  . • '.  e1.'  h;  '  ' h -,  , ' D p i i es  t he  P  ' ) v : s i o ns  of
/  - " '<  ? • - ?'  ' ."  '  - :>  V . :'  >'  • • -'  •  • '•  '•  : • - '•  T1^ *-
„ •„  ,,  .,  i,  1,  2i : ,J rl  , .;  ".  v,  M .H  ..  '  , \ v i-  •  -.o  .  " I'  " ' o r . -e  r :i  ' . he  . ' f i .h  d ay  o£
;:;.,.  .-i-.;-,-.;  VfJT.
|N>;  H/lfi.v'(i7-PF.il. !
 
w f"  >"•?•;  -w: , ^ •-  • ••-•'>•  1.Jii'-  Con 1.-a•  vv>v<:r;>nvnf  t h at  t he e m p l o y er ,  ' "' )  .,."',  =,.-'.  .--->  .,.>.  ':. r r i c i t i 'v  •->  he cfl;;i.lishirient  k n o wn as '  u-  * , ' :c.  , . "•  : . ' ,JV r , - " , -"  •-  ..  i ' '-  'T  •  •;  ^i  ' - ' i'  T X ' - H i te  U ' v i r w al  '1  a l a o.  N a d i a cl  ( G u j a r at

44i"  J ut  U A / L UL  Ui  l:\Ul \.  \o\tMul'.H  18,  !'!(),, kAR SlkA  2/.  1889  [Puu  II-
Now,  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  po-.vers  conferred  by  sub-section  (4)  of  sec- tion  1  of  the  said  Act,  the  Central  Gov.-. invent  hereby  applies  the  provisions  of tne  saia  Ace  to  tr>e  .;"iid  establishment
This  notification  shall  be  de.-med  to  /:>>-.  tome  into  force  on  the  30th  day  of September,  1987.
[No.  8/157/67-PFII.]
S.O.  4126.—Whereas  it  appears  +o  th.  (Central  Government  that  the  employer and  the  mabiity  of  the  employees  ir  •.l.iion  to  the  establishment  known  as Messrs  Poiynr-;e  ludustues.  Karmayt.g.  Pavsi,  Panchayat  Road,  Andheri  (East), Bombay-69  (AS),  have  ;.,ree<.!  that  'bs  --.rivisions  ot  the  Employees"  Provident Funds  Act,  1952  :i:"  <:f  1s)M';.  should  be  .iadr  applicable  to  the  said  establishment;
New.  therefore,  in  exer:;sa  uf  U:-e  powers  conferred  bv  sub-section  (4)  of  sec- tion  1  of  the  said  Ad,  ti: •  Ctrir.jl  Government  hereby  applies  the  provisions  of the  said  Ar< to  V e  tr.il  i.  is-bii^hnient
This  notification  r-hull  be  deemed  ti  'nave  rome  into  iorce  on  the  1st  day  of October.  1D07-
[No.  8/153/67-PF.II.]
S.O.  •1127.- -Whereas  it  appears  to  the  Central  Government  that  the  employer and  Ihe  majority  ii  ihe  employee's  iii  rclatjDn  l<;  i'ne  establishment  known  as Messrs  Viciyul  Equip;nei:l  C'jmpa.w,  44-B,  Seshadripuram.  Main  Road,  Bangalore-20, have  agreed  that  the  provisions  of  the  Employees'  Provident  Funds  Act,  1952  (19 of  i!"52).  should  le  made  applicable  to  the  said  establishment:
.Vow.  t^-preioie,  in  t-xercise  of  t':;>  powers  oonierred  by  sub-section  (.4)  of  sec- tion  i  of  :he  t'")d  Aci,  the  Central  Government  hereby  applies  the  provisions  of the  said  .\^'  '•  >  Vic  -aiJ  e:;fabHs".rrienl
This  notification  nhail  be  deemed  to  have  come  into  force  on  the  1st  day  of October  l')'-7
[No.  3/160/67-PF.II.]
S.O.  H'iS.- -Whtrens  it  appears  to  the  Ccnfral  Government  that  the  employer and  the  majority  of  the  employees  in  relation  b,  Use  establishment  known  as Messrs-  Frasad  Agarwal  &  Company,  14.  Silver  Jubilee  Park  Road,  Bangalore-2, have  ag-eed  that  the  provisions  of  tho  Employees'  Provident  Funds  Act,  1952  (19 of  1952).  should  be  'r.ade  applicable  to  the  said  e:;f
t;b]ishjrent;
Now,  therefore,  in  exerci"e  of  the  powers  conieire,-'  by  sub-section  (.4)  of  sec- :ion  1 of  the  said  Act.  the  C'ut'-al  Co've  vnenr  hsreby  applies  the  provisions  of the  said  -Vt  to  the  , aid  establish.nent
TM'.  •"•otiflcation  shall  be  delved  Xn hrvo  CO:'.JO  into  force  on  the  1st  day  of October.  1 t"*S7-
[?v*o.  8/159/67  PF  II.]
HANS  RAJ  CHKABRA,  Under  Secy.
(.Depaitmcut  of  Labour  and  EmploymeHt)
.V'.'?.-  r-c'hi  1':,c 1th  NacLPiber  1967
S.O.  41!!). — in  < xer :-l>c  of  Ihe  powers  contrived  by  sub-section  (2)  of  section  5 of  the  Dork  WcrkiTs  i.Ke.r^Vtion  <-i '.mpluyjrielit)  Act,  1948  (!)  of  1948j.  read with  clau.-o  i.""  (-  ~u!c  .-! cf  T'-.O Bock  Workers  (Advisory  Committee)  Rules.  1962, the  Cenl'-a!  Grr.nnmeji  herelrv  ;iBpoinl-:  Shri  Nibarendu  Dutt  Mazumdar  as  a member  ~..  iha  Deck  Worker,-;  Advisory  CcmjrJtte^  to  lepresent  dock  workers ctce  Sbj.-'  ^?is-'. math  Pub?y,  expired,  and  makes  the  to'lowing  further  amend- ment  in  •,!•>'  notification  of  the  CtO-rrame it  of  India,  in  the  late  Ministry  of Labour  .. i>i  E'Tiplc-'-ncnr  A:o.  S.O  C4.-3,  dat-r1  xhe  1'^b  Ana-;t,  1?63,  namely:—
In  the  said  notification,  under  1'"c  heading.  "fttVrribdrs  representing  the  dock irorkers".  in  item  (1>.  for  the  existing  entry,  thp  forowtisf  entry  shall  be substituted,  namely:—
"Shvi  Nibr.rcndu  Duit  ^""yurridui.  Gcror?!  So Tetary.  West  Bengal  Dock Mazcioov  Union.  Calratta "'
 
\ No.  633/5/66-Fae.II.l

SEC  3(ii)]  THE  GA2ITTE  OF INDIA :  NOVEMBER  18,  IWft/KARTHKA  27W \m  4 ^7
New  Delhi,  the  9th  November  1967
S.O.  4130-—In  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  section  4  of  the  Mica  Mines Labour  Welfare  Fund  Act,  1946  (22  of  1946),  read  with  sub-rule  (3)  of  rule  3 of  the Mica  Mines  Labour  Welfare  Fund  Rules,  1948,  the  Central  Governme  Hereby appoints  the  Regional  Labour  Commissioner  (C),  Ajmer  as  the  repreati.ietive  of the  Central  Government  on  the  Mica  Mines  Labour  Welfare  Fund  Advisui/  Com- mittee  for  the  State  of  Rajasthan,  constituted  by  the  notification  of  the  Government of  India  in  the  late  Ministry  of  Labour  and  Employment  No  2390  dated  the  22nd July  1965  vice  the  Conciliation  Officer  (Central),  Ajmer,  and  makes  the  following amendment  in  the  said  notification,  namely: —
In  the  said  notification,  for  the  existing  entry  against  Item  (2),  the  entry "Regional  Labour  Commisaioner(C),  Ajmer",  shall  be  substituted.
LNo.  7(33)/67-MIlI.J K.  D.  HAJELA,  Under  Secy.
(Department  of  Labour  and  Employment)
New  Delhi,  the  9th  November  1067
S.O.  4131.—Whereas  the  National  Coal  Development  Corporation  Limited  has, In  pursuance  of  clause  (ii)  of  sub-rule  (1)  of  rule  3  of  the  Coal  Mines  Rescue Rules,  1950,  nominated  Shri  S-  Yegneswaran,  Area  General  Manager  (B  and  K) Kargali  to  be  a  member  to  represent  the  said  Corporation  on  the  Central  Coal Mines  Rescue  Stations  Committee  vice  Shri  C.  Balram;
Now,  therefore,  in  pursuance  of  sub-rule  (1)  of  rule  3 of  the  Coal  Mines  Rescue Rules  1959  the  Central  Government  hereby  makes  the  following  amendment  in the  notification  of  the  Government  of  India  in  the  late  Ministry  of  Labour  and Employment  No.  S.O.  3310,  dated  the  13th  October,  1965,  namely:—
In  the  said  notification,  for  the  existing  entry  against  item  2,  the  following entry  shall  be" substituted,  namely:—
"Shri  S  Yegneswaran,  Area  General  Manager  (B  and  K),  National  Coal Development  Corporation  Limited,  Kargali  Post  Office  Bermo,  Dis- trict  Hazaribagh.
[No,  14/24/B7-M.I.1 J.  D.  TEWARI,  Under  Secy.
[Office  of  the  Chief  Labour  Commissioner  (C)J
ORDER
New  DelM,  the  8th  November  1967
S O.  4132.—Whereas  an  application  has  been  made  by  the  establishment,  carrying on  operation  concerning  any  mine  other  than  coal  mentioned  in  the  Schedule below  for  extension  of  the  period  specified  in  clause  (b)  of  section  19 of  the  Pay- ment  of  Bonus  Act,  1965  (No.  21'  of  1965),  for  the  payment  of  bonus  to  iheir employees  for  the  accounting  year  ended  on  the  31st  December,  1966;
And  whereas  Chief  Labour  Commissioner  is  satisfied  that  there  are  sufficient
reasons  so  to  do;
Now  therefore,  in  exercise  of  the  powers  conferred  by  the  proviso  to  clause (b)  of  section  19  of  the  said  Act,  read  with  the  notificationothe;  Government  of India  in  the  Ministry  of  Labour  and  Employment  No.  WB-20(42)/65,  dated  the 28th  August  1965  I  O.  Venkatachalam,  Chief  Labour  Commissioner  hereby extend  the  per  od  within  which  the  said  bonus  shall  be  paid  by  the  establishment to  12  (twelve)  months  from  the  close  of  the  accounting  year  ended  on  the  31st December.  1966.
THE  SCHEDULE
1  Ferro  Alloys  Corporation  Ltd.  Hn  respect  of  Rejati  I,  Regati  II, PO  Shree  Ram  Nagar  Garividi  Pedlabantupalli,  Gudem  lime  quar- R.S.  (S.E.  Rly.)  Distt.  Srikakulam  ries.) (A P ) '
[No.  BA-6(29)/67-LSI.l
O,  VENKATACHALAM,
Chief  Labour  Commisslonrr  (Central).

4418  THE  GAZETTE OF INDIA: NOV.  18, iafi7/KARTIKA  27,  1889  (PA"T  ll-Sec.  8
ERRATUM
In  the  Gazette  of  India,  Part  II,  Section  3,  Sub-section  II,  Issue  No.  32,  dated the  12th  August  1967,  In  Notification  No.  6/120/68-LRII,  under  Ministry  of  Labour Employment  and  Rehabilitation,  dated  the  29th  July  1967,  the  following  corrections are  to  be  made  : —
(1)  on  page  2785  for  "SO.  2721",  read  "S.O  2721—2722".
(11)  on  page  2786  delete  S.O.  2722, falling  in  the  last  but  one  line.
MINISTRY  OF  STEEL,  MINES  AND  METALS
(DapartnMot  of  Mines  &  Metal*)
ERRATUM
New  Delhi,  the  9th  November  1967
••0.  4138—In  the  notification  of  the  Government  of  India  in  the  Ministry  of Steel,  Mines  and  Metals  (Department  of  Mines  and  Metals)  No,  SO.  1950,  dated the  29th  May,  1967,  published  in  Part-II,  Section  3,  sub-section  (ii)  of  the  Gazette of  India  Extraordinary  dated  the  31st  May,  1907  at  pages  1123  to  1126  : —
(1)  at  page  1125 : —
(i)  in  line  2,  for  "Farangdih",  read  "Jarangdih"; (ii)  in  line  22, In  the  tabular  statement  for  "SI.  Bo"  in  the  first  column,  read "SI.  No.";
(ill)  in  line  32, for  "2  to  59",  read  "2  to  50"; (ivl  In  line  39,  for  "1082(P),  read  "1082"; (v)  In  line  41,  for  "Faridlh",  read  "Jaridlh"; (vi)  in  line  49,  for  "25(8P)'\  read  "258(P)h>; (vil)  in  the  lest  line,  for  "378(P)",  read  "368(P)";
(2)  at  page  1126 : —
(1)  In  line  31,  for  "084",  read  "1084";
(ii)  In  line  38  for  "at  point1",  read  "at  point  'Q')"; (ill)  In  line  48,  for  "23", read "3"; (iv)  In  line  50,  for  "a  and  1391",  read  "1  and  1391"-
[No.  C2-20(l3)/64.]
RAM  SAHAY,  By.  Secy.
eWNTKD  IN  INDIA  BY  THE  C l N M A t.  M A N W I R,  GOVERNMENT  OF  INDIA  PWtH,
NEW  OlUBI  AND  FUBLISK1P  "Y  THE  MANAOIK  Of  PUBLICATIONS,  DBf.HI,  1 9 67




>Sj.—In pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 387 of the Income-tax Act, TH) 1 (4.1 of 1961), tht Cintril G>vjrrniMtt, b=inj of opinion that it is expedient in the public Interest »o to do, hereby publishes the names'Xof the asseasees. (a) being individuals or Hindu undivided families, who have been assessed on" an income of more than a lakh of rupees; (b) being firms, associations of persons of Companies who lave been assessed on an Income of more than ten lakhs of rupees; •during the financial year 1965-66. I. Individuals and Hindu undivided families who have been assessed on an income of more than a lakh of rupees during the financial year 1965-66. Stetui Name and address of the assessees Assessment ye*r SL No. Income asses- sed under the Income- tax Act, 1961 II. Firms, «sioci«ion of persons and companki who have been ameiied on an income of more than ten lakhi of rupee* during thefinancialyear 1965-46. Status Assessment year SI. No. Name and addreii of the aiienee t 1 Income assaMad under the Income- tax Act, 1961 ↩
*962-63 P. H. Modi, Partner in M/». J. Khushaldas & Co. Vi)ayawada . . . . . . „ 1965-66 1965-66 Goli Eswaxaiah, General Bazar, Secundrabad Girajmal Ramachander, Bidi Manufacturer, 8 9 Nizamabad . . • • H. R. Tittsworth c/o Caltex Oil Refineries (India) „" Ltd., Visakhapatnam . . .. John Macconkeyi c/o D o. . . . .. John Ue'Sozaj Hyderabad I? T A< ^RA 1,51,04a 3^4.773 3,85,108 4.06.774 1,33,183 2,59,247 2,51,331 1,61,627 I.5O3334 K. Ramakrishnamurthy, Guntur . . . . K. S. Svbbaiah Plllal, Guntur; HUF. IndL 1064-6 <; 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1964-65 1965-66 1963-64 1965-66 Kandimallu Raghavaiah, Chilakaluripet, Guntur 13 - 14 15 Distt. . .. • - .1963-64 • • L; A. Rayburn, c/o Caltex Oil Refineries (India) Ltd.j Visakhapatnam Indl.j 1963-64 3,14,000 I 12 OoR 1964-65 1965-66 1965-66 M. V. R. K. Muthyalu, Guntur H - Maddi Venkataratnam, Pasamarru, Narasaraopet^ • Guntur Distt. Maddi VenkUcswara Rao, Pasamarru, Narasarao* pet, Guntiir District . . . .. T r>rt RRt 1965-66 »] Maddi Laxmaiah, Pasamarru, Narasaraopet Tq., Guntur Distt HUF. Maddi Satyauarayana, Pasamarru, NanuaraopetJ Tq., Guntur Distt. IndL 5^86,206 22 *3 24 25 26 1,43,527I,04,7<2 MotOal Bansilal (R.B.) Begum Bazar, Hyderabad Moazam Jab. Bahadur (Prince), Hybd. Muffakam Jah Bahadur (Prince), Hyderabad Mukkaram Jah Bahadur (Prince), Hyderabad . Muralal Goverdbanlal, Begum Bazar^Hydcrabad P. Vcnkata Krishnaiah Naidu, Chittoor Pokarmal Gupta, Muktiar Gun), Hyderabad HUF. IndL 1965-66 1961-62 1965-66 1965-66 1965-66 1962-63 1961-62 1963-64 1^0,095 ↩
9» Mills Ba .gulore-2 . . . .. S. V. R;ingaswamy M/s S. V. Rangaswamy & Co., N . R. Road, Bangalore . . .. Indl. 3.46,3↩
8.0 i3.o 1.7 ↩
By Notification No. 8/25/67-LRII, dated April, 25, 1967 the Ministry of 'Labour, Employment & Rehabilitation, Government of India, exercising powers under Section 33B I.D. Act transferred 100 cases which were references of Indus- trial Disputes, under Section 10 I.D. Act pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad to this Tribunal. By the same order, it was stated that all cases arising out of those references, either under Section 33-A I.D. Act would also stand transferred to this Tribunal. Tn consequence of the afore- said order, two References Nos. 4 and 79/^5 of industrial disputes between the Indian Copper Corporation Ltd. (to be hereinafter described as Corporation) and their workmen were transferred to this Tribunal. jn connection with these refe- rences 10 cases under Section 33-A Sled by individual workmen against the Cor- poration and 337 cases under Seciion 33(2) (b) or 33(3) (b) for approval or per- mission filed by the Corporation were also transferred to 1his Tribunal. A list of these cases are appended with tills order as annexure "A". A few applications were also received subsequent to the transfer of the main references, from the Corporation in respect of action taken against certain other workmen and these are also stated in the annexure "A", There is only one Union operating, both for the mines and i- named as Mosaboni Mines Labour Union, tn be hereinafter called, the Union. In all these cases the Corporation desired this Tribunal to determined the question whether the workman in every case was a concerned workman or not, as a preliminary question on the basis of observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. D. R. Singh reported in 1965 (II)LLJ p. 12'J.. The Union claimed representation in 57 eases mentioned in list but they had authority from the workman concerned in some and not in Others. The Union, however, under took to file the requisite authority in the remaining cases in which they have no such authority. Full-fledged arguments on the lepal aspect of the matter were, therefore, heard so as to record a compre- hensive order to govern all cases of the Corporation in which they wanted deter- mination of this question as a preliminary point. This was done at camp Allahabad on 14th July 1967. After hearing arguments from both sides an order -was recorded on 25th July 1967 which is annexure "B" to this order. The order disposed of the preliminary objection raised by the Corporation in so far as pure- ly the lepal aspect of the matter was concerned and was passed for all the cases of the Corporation irrespective of the fact whether -the workman concerned was or was not represented through the Union. After the said order was passed in respect of those cases in which Union claimed representation, whether being references or applications under Section 3-3-A or 33(2) (b) or 33(3) (b) dates were fixed for evidence and hearing between 29th August and 3rd September, 1967 at camp Ghatsila, rather Mosaboni. Meanwhile, a telegram was received on IHh August 1987 that most of the cases were being negotiated for compromise. Since, however, there were many cases in which Union was riot representative of the opposite party in cases under Section 33 dates for hearing were altered but the tour programme was curtailed for three dates on 29th, 30th and 31st August 1967. On 29th August 1967 compromise petition was filed by the parties in all the cases. 'From the terms of settlement main Reference No 72/67 was compromised and ↩
' 7J l\IT ^U a n Ce Ot s c c t i on ]V oj: t he Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 ? L ↩
? £  Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, in the industrial dispute between the employers In relation to the Bhadrasai Manganese Mine of Messrs Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited, Barbil and their workmen, which was rer-eived by the Central P«-v eminent on the 7th November, 19(57. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA Employers in relation to the Bha-irasai Manganese Mine ol' 'M/s- Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited, Their workmen Shri S K. Sen—Presiding Officer. On behalf of Employers—Shrl D- Basil Thakur, Legal Adviser, Benjjal Chamber of Commerce & Industry with Shri N. De On behalf of Workmen—Shri Ali Amjad, Advocate & Shri Hiri Bandhu Behra. STATE: Orissa INDUSTRY: Mang:inese Mine. AWARD By Order No. 35/3/66-LRII dated 5th March 1966, the Central Govermni-nt referred for adjudication an industrial dispute between 1he employers in relation to the Bhadrasai Manganese Mine of Messrs Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited, Barbil and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in the follow- ing schedule: "Whether the termination of services of the following workmen employed in the Bhadrasai Mangnne.se Mine of Messrs Orissa Minerals Deye'opment Company Limited, (Post Office Barbil, District Keonjhqr. Orissa) with effect from the date mentioned against the name of each workman Is justified? If not, to what relief are they entitled? Date of Termination of Designation Name of the workmen :iervice. Tool Shaper Mining Mazdoor Dressing Kain Mining Kamin Dresaine Kamin Do, Do. Do. Shri Jagmohan Lob nr Phri Lchia Munda amt. aukuru Dei amt. aaraswatiDei Smt. Sukurcmani Smt. Raiani Dei Smt, Saiicbai . .. Smt. Sumitre Dei Smt, Jema Dei • • • Smt. Durpati Dei Shri Nabin Patra Sbri Rabi Mahakud • Shri Makru . . .. Smt. Malli Dei • ShriNarendra - • • • Packing Kamin Dressing Kamin Mining Mazdoor : Dressing Kamin Mining Mazdoor Dressing Kamin Mining Mazdoor 1st. September 1965 8th Do. 30th Do, 2 0* Do. 6th Do. 8th Do. 1st Do. 25th August 1965 20th September 1965 27th August 1965 8th September 1965 26th August 1965 6th September 1965 27th August 1965 8th August 1965 ↩
 ↩
: :' SI , •'••" C.".'iies Comp;i.>v Ltd.. Rudrampur Division, P.O. AWALD ↩
' C'siapt:.-r IV i tw' ' e tt s-vtiunr. 4v and ir> v.'hi; h have cireadj' been brought irro iorc-.) and C h a p t er V and V,r I"except sio-.section ( I oi set ion 76, a nd ivciionf 77. Ti' TJ and {}' wj-.eh have already ho^i brought i.oio ''ocr-oj of the said H"t shall co'.r.e i'lio i'wve 1;: UM t'blowing 3 re a in the State of Madras, namely:— T!-'; a r fj comprised \iiih:'n las jirnjt:- ci ;.ii<; revenue vjll.-e.e oi Myleripalayam in Cr>ir.ib.'itore taiuk in Cofni^at^re Cis-trici. ;;"=s''; "... ,-..",. i .. .'.^."..;.-; -">, „'- ;:,., "F -.-i^ir'p"s' Pro"ident Funds Act. ↩