Subject NOT available

click here for IIIF manifest

REGISTERED No. D. 222.

The Gazette of India

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

No. 36] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1969/BHADRA 15,1891

Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed

as a separate compilation.

NOTICE

The undermentioned Gazettes of India Extraordinary were published up to the 9th August, 1969:—

Issued by

Subject

No. and Date

Issue No.

269 S. O. 3202, dated 7th

Quality control and preshipment inspec- August, 1969

Ministry of Foreign

Trade and Supply

S.O.3203, dated 7th Au-

270

Ministry of Law

gust, 1969

S.O. 3204, dated 7th Au-

Do.

gust, 1969

tion of Cast Iron Pipes and Fittings. Biennial election to the Council of States by the elected members of the Legislative Assembly of Pondicherry. Shri S. Sivaprakasam, elected as a member of the Council of States for the union territory of Pondicherry is notified or general information.

(3707)

Issue No. and Date Issued by Subject

No.

Approval of th; film as spiclflod In S.O. 3207. dated 7th Au-

271

{ the Schedule therein.

J Ministry of Infornu-

tioi ani Broidcastinj

gust, 1969.

*r>° 3 2 0 8, ftttfa

Wff 1

7*J>TOr, 1 9 69 l]

S.O. 33:19, dated 8:h Ai- M. lhtry of Fo:;lga Tcii: Ail Supply j j

gusc, 1969.

Qiility co itro¹ and prsshlpmsnt Inspec- tloi of ci3t iroa mitiholc covers and frames.

M lij'ryof Frnance

S.O 3"O, di'ed 8h Ai-

273

gait, 1969.

Exempting every Indian company from the operation of Bection 104 of the Incomj-tax Act, 1961, in respect of ths previous year relevant to the asse- ssment year commencing on the i"t day of April, 1970, and any subse- quent year. ,

S. O. 3211, dated 9th Au-

274

gust, 1959.

Ministry of Industrial DiVilopm;nf, Inter- nil T r a i: aai C i q- piay Affiirs. {

Granting recognition to the Vansispati Mjnufacturcrs' Association of India, Bo.iuayfor a further period ofons year from the 10th August, 1969 upto the 9th August, 1970 in respect of {forward contracts in ground nut oil.

tr$° ^0 3212,fipTn7

9^'TCT, J 96 9 Ij

^T^T 9 S T ^, 1 9 70 OTT

^

^ •^ arrr HT?JT

275 S.O. 3213, dafed 9* Au- Ministry 01 Food, Aj- Fixing th: minimum uniform certifi- gust, 1969.

cation standard of certified seed the country for the crops.

riculture, Comrnu-

iiity OiVilopmsnt

and Company Affairs

tjffo ft\* 32 1 4, foTTT

Sfl^W, 1 9 69 r

ftr^ ^ cm ^ vw ^ RT ^r

Copies of the Gazettes Extraordinary mentioned above will be supplied on Indent to the Manager of Publications, Civil Lines, Delhi Indents should be •ubmltted so as to reach the Manager within ten days of the date of issue of these Gazettes.

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

Statutory orders nnd notifications issued l"y the Ministries of the Govern- ment of India (other than the Ministry of Defence) and by Central Authorities (other than the Administration of Union Territories).

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Neu> Delhi, the 21st August 1969

8.0. 3483.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 13A of the Representation of the People Act, 1960, the Election Commission, in consultation with the Government of Andhra Pradesh, hereby nominates Shri S. A. Quader Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration Department as the Chief Electoral Officer for the State of Andhra Pradesh from the date he takes over charge vice Shri A, Krishnaswamy.

[No. 164/1/69.]

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 12th August 1969

S.O. 3484.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Attar Singh, J87/188 J. J. Colony, Ring Road, New Delhi, a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from South Delhi constituency has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses within the time and in the manner required by the Hepresentatlon of the People Act, 1991, and the Rules made thereunder;

2. And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission Is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure;

3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Attar Singh to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three yearn from the date of this order.

[No. DL-HP/2/67(l).]

S.O. 3485.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Bahadur Singh, J-3/184, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, a contesting candidate for election to the House of the People from South Delhi constituency has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses In the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;

2. And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission is satisfied that lie has no good reason or justification for such failure;

3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Bahadur Singh to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order.

[No. DL-HP/2/67(2).]

S.O. 3486.—Whereas the Election Commission Is satisfied that Shri Tatyarao Masaji, p. O. Gadi Goundgaon, Taluka Baswakalyan, at present residing at H. No. 12/1004, New Mazid, North Lallarguda, Secunderabad, a contesting candidate

for election to the House of People from Bldar constituency, held in February, 1967 has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses within the time and in the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1931, and the Aules made thereunder;

And whereas, after considering the representation by the said candidate, the- Election Commission is further satisfied that he has no good reason or Justification for the failure;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Tatyarao Masaji to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three year* from the date of this Order.

[No. MY-HP/1/67.]

By Order,

R. S. RAJAGOPALAN, Secy.

ORDEBS

New Delhi, the 31st July 1989

S.O. JM"1.~Whereas the Election Commission ia sptigned thpl Sht\ Bupal So";n R/O villafe Mghanpur, Debkl Iflllifc, P..O- Hdtda, Dlsttict PtiimW CBthxt). a contesting candidate for election to the Bihar Legislative AstMfnbKy frtfit

138-Maniharl Assembly Constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses as required by the Representation oi the People Act, 1B51, and the Rules made thereunder;

2. And whereas, the said candidate even alter due notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure;

3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election. Commission hereby declares the aaid Shri Rupal Soren, to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legisla- tive Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from. the date of this order.

[No. BR-LA/138/69(5).J

New Delhi, the Uth August 1969

S.O. 3492.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Eana Das, B/O village Sirajabad, P O. Ganipur Bejha, District Muzaflarpur (Bihar), a contesting candidate lor flection to the Bihar Legislative Assembly from Patepur constituency, held in February, 1969 has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses in the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951f and the Rules made thereunder;

And whereas, after considering the representation made by the said candidate, the Election Commission is further satisfied that he has no good reason or justifi- cation for such failure;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Eana Das to be disqualified for being, chosen as, and for being a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legisla- tive Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order-

[No. BR-LA/51/69C8).];

New Delhi, the 12th August 1969

S.O. 3493.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Raj Baha- dur Lal resident of Mohalla Narghat, Post office city, Tehsil and District Mirza- Eur (Uttar Pradesh) a contested candidate for election to the Uttar Pradeshr egislative Assembly from 270-Mirzapur Assembly Constituency held on 23rd February, 1967 has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses at all as- required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there- under;

2. And whereas, the said candidate even after the due notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for such failure;

3, Now, therefore, In porsuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Raj Bahadur Lal to be dlsqua'Ified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a period of three- years from the date of this order.

[No. UP-LA/270/87.'J

New Delhi, the 13th August 1969

S.O. 3494.—Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that Shri Fernandez Pio Joao Vicente, Bairo Bondir, St. Cruz, Ilhas, Goa, a contesting candidate for election to the Goa, Daman and Diu Legislative Assembly from Santa Cruz Con- stituency, has fared to lodge an account of his election expenses In the manner required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there- under;

2. Aqd where*^ the said candidate even after due notice ha" not given any reason or eatplanation for the failure and the Election Conntilssion is satisfied that he has no good reason or justification for sucb failure;

3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri Fernandes Pio Joao Vicente to be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of State for a period of three yeara from the date of this order.

[No. GOA-LA/12/67.]

By Order,

A. N. SEN, Secy.

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

New Delhi, the 25th August 1969

S.O. 5499.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (2) of article 77 of the Constitution, the President hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Authentication (Orders and other Instruments) Rules, 1968, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Authentication (Orders and other Instru- ments) (Sixth Amendment) Rules, 1969.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2, In rule 2 of the Authentication (Orders and other Instruments) Rules, 1958, for clause (13), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:—

(13) in the case of orders and other instruments relating to the Ministry of Food, Agriculture. Community Development and Co-operation (Depart- ment of Food), by the Chief Director of Purchase, Deputy Chief Director of Purchase, Assistant Chief Director of Purchase, a Direc- tor or a Deputy Director in the Department of Food in that Minis- try; or

[No. F. 3/5/69-Pub. L]

K. R. PRABHU, Jt. Secy.

(Office of the Competent Authority)

NOTICE

New Delhi, the 25th August 1969

S.O. 3500,—Notice is hereby given by the Competent Authority in pursuance of rule 8 of the Notaries Rules, 1956, that application has been made to the said Authority, under rule 4 of the said Rules, by Shri Bal Krishan, Advocate, Hanu- mangarh Town for appointment as a notary to practice in the district of Gangana- gar with headquarters at Hanumangarh Town.

2. Any objection to the appointment of the said person as a notary may be submitted in writing to the undersigned within fourteen days of the publication •of this notice.

[No. 28/35/68-Judl. III.]

K. THYAGARAJAN, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF LAW

(Legislative Department)

New Delhi, the 20th Augutt 1969

S.O. 3501.—In exercise of the powers conferred by aufb-section (1) of section 72 •of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 (31 of 1966), the Central Government hereby • d i r e c ts t h at BO l o ng as t he B o a rd of W a k fs e o n s t i t u t ed f or t he f o r m er S t a te of

Punjab continues to function and operate as an inter State body corporate in the areas in respect of Which it waa functioning and operating immediately before the 1st November, 1966 the reference to 'State in sub-section (2) Of section 5 of the "Wakf Actj 1964 (2" of 1954), shall in relation to the Punjab wakf Board, be con- strued as a reference to the State of Punjab as it existed Immediately befort the lot day of November, 1666.

[No. 6(l)/69-Waqf.]

(Wa<|f Section) New Delhi, the 25th August 106"

S.O. 350S.—In exercise of the powers, conferred by section 5 of the Dargah Khawaja Saheb Act, 1985 (S0 of 1955), anti in continuation of the notification of the Government 61 India¹ in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals No. 17(5)/ •4-M.W. dated th" 27th August, 1964, the Central Government hereby reappoints

Shri Molnul Haque Choudhury, Advocate, Gauhatl (Assam), a Haiufi Muslim, as a member of the Dargah Committee, Ajmer, with effect from the 27th August, 1969.

LNo. ll(9)/68-WAQF.J K. VENKATESWARAN, Dy. Secy.

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND CHEMICALS AND MINES AND METALS

(Department of Petroleum)

New Delhi, the 14th August 1969

S.O. 3505.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary hi the public interest that the transport of Petroleum from the drill sites well No. 49 to GGS III in the Kalol Oil Field, in Gujarat State, Pipelines should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Commission and that for the purpose of laying ouch pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the Land described In the Schedule annexed thereto.

'

2. Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (i) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

3- Any person Interested In the said land may, within 21 days from the date; of this notification objeqt to the faying of the pipelines under th" land to th*

Competent Authority, at Western Region, Shed No. 27, Makarpura Road, Near Central Workshop, Baroda 4, in the Office of the Gujarat Pipelines (Oil and. Natural Gas Conamlsslon), Baroda. Every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard In person or by a legal practitioner.

SCHEDUI E

For laying Pipeline (Feeder Line) From Point Ntcr well No. 49 to G.G.S.III.

State—Gnjrat Diat.—Mehsana Taluka—Kadi

Villafii

S.No.

Hectare Are. P.Are.

22

AMBAVPURA

0 0

0

ICO x o y / iA . . .. 109/1B 1 0 9 /2 . . ..

0

0

0 0

. ..

0

4 0 6 2 1 0 4 4

roy/lA v.p. Curt track V.P. Curt truck no . 119/-a

98 65 5" 17 50 11 60 77 85

[No. 20/3/67-IOC/Lab. &Legis(a).]

S.O. 3506 —Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary In the public interest that the transport of Petroleum from the drill sites well No. 49 to GGS III in the Kalol Oil Field, in Gujarat State, Pipelines should be laid by the Oil & Natural Gas Commission and that for the purpose of laying, such Pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land described in the Sehtdub annexed thereto.

2. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (i) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein,

3- Any person interested In the said land may, within 21 days from the date of this notification object to the laying of the pipelines under the land to the Competent Authority, at Western Region, Shed No. 27, Makarpura Road, Near Central Workshop, Baroda, 4, in the Office of the Gujarat Pipelines (Oil andj Natural Gas Commission), Baroda- Every person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner.

S CHEDUI E

Laying Pipeline (Feeder Linc)frem Point Near tvell No. 49 to O.C S III

State.—Gujrat Dist.—Mehsana Tal —Kalol

Village

S.No.

Hectare Are. P.Are.

0

6

1619/1&2

57 PANSAR

, [No. 20/3/67-IOC/Lab. &Legis(c).]

New Delhi, the 16th August 1969

8.0. 3507.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary tn the public Interest that the transport of Petroleum from the drill sites well No. K-122 to GGS VI in the (Kalol) Oil Field, in Gujarat State, Pipelines should be laid toy the Oil and Natural Gas Commlastbn and that for the purpose of laying.

such Pipelines, It is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land described In the schedule annexed thereto-

2. Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (i) oi the Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

3. Any person interested in the said land may, within 21 days from the date of this notification object to the laying of the pipelines under the land to the Competent Authority, at Western Region, Shed No. 27, Makarpura Road, Near Central Workshop, Baroda 4, in the Office of the Gujarat Pipelines (Oil and Natural Gas Commission), Baroda. Evey person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner.

SCHEDULE

Laying Pipeline from 122—K to O.G.S. VI.

State—Gujrat Dist.—Mehsana Taluka.—Kadi

Village

S.No.

Hectare Arc.

P.Arc.

i

0

00 ZULLASAN

0

10 719 710

0

10

1

0

0 0

0

0 0 0

14 2 3 4 5 3 0 711 714 ' . . - -. 713 562 559/1 • 559/a 559/3 559/4 560

0 0

0 Road VWP Track

j

0

558/x

00 92 00 69 40 90 94 07 38 60 91 95

0

iCHADASAN

0

17 5 0

0

0

0 0 0

10 14 1

0 0

29 33 65 70 66 17 S2 87 5O 65

. ..

12 0 13 0 9 2

8

£ 8

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 9 2 2

0

91 20 62 21 pa

5 IS 3 15 1

0 0 0 0 0

39i 3 92 R o ad V . P. T r a ck . . .. 3 85 . . . .. 3 84 3 83 3 82 3 98 3 99 . . . .. 3 50 3 49 3 5* . 3 4# . • " • • 3 47 R o ad . . . . .. 4 °3 4 04 4 0 5 /1 4 ° T /2 4 06 . . . . .. 4 08 . . . . .. 4 07 4 *0 . . . Krins

,

% 3a 21 37

tNo. 20/8/67-IOC/Lab, & L"gfc. J

S.O. 3508.—Whereas it appears to the Central Government that it is necessary In the public interest that the transport of Petroleum from the drill sites well. No. K-124 to GGS VI In the Kalol Oil Field, in Gujarat State, Pipelines should be laid by the Oil and Natural Gas Commission and that for the purpose of laying such Pipelines, it is necessary to acquire the Right of User in the land described in the schedule annexed thereto-

2. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (i) of the Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of .1962), the Central Government hereby declares its intention to acquire the right of user therein.

3. Any person interested In the said land may, within 21 days from the date of this notification object to the laying of the pipelines under the land to the Competent Authority, at Western Region, Shed No- 27, Makarpura Road, Near Central Workshop, Baroda 4, in the Office of the Gujarat Pipelines (Oil and Natural Gas Commission), BarodEi. livery person making such an objection shall also state specifically whether he wishes to be heard in person or by a legal practitioner.

SCHEDULE

For Laying Line front well No. 124 10 G.G.S. VI

  S1.1AC- Gviiurat                                  Dist—Meh?ana                   Tal.—Kadi
     Village               S.No.                                    Hectare     Arc.     P. Are
ZOLASAKU;                Vilngc Panchayat  Cart  .                     5
                         Track                                         5           5         56
                         JO7                                           0           4         65
                         526                                           0          11         33
                         525/2                                         0           8         59
                         5Z7/2&3                                       0           8         89
                         527/1                                         0           7         08
                         527/4                                         0           1         61
                         53°/2/Z                                       0           3         34
                         530/2/F                                       0           1         85
                         530/2/D                                       0           5         86-
                         530/2/C                                       0           8         24
                         538                                           0           5         76
                         537/6                                         0         10          83
                         537/5                                         0          4          44
                         537/4                                         0          4          84
                         555/3                                         0           1         00
                         536/7                                         0           5
                         536/3                                         0           4
                         556                                           0         10          56u
                         557                                           0           3         74

[No. 20/3/a7-IOC/Lab.&Legis.(A).I'

New Delhi, the 23rd August 1969

8.0. 3509.—Whereas by notification of the Government of India in the Minis- try of Petroleum and Chemicals S.O. No. 2876 dated 7th June, 1969 under sub- section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User to land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared Its Intention to acquire the Right of User in the lands, specified in the Schedule appended to that notification, for the purpose of laying pipelines;

And whereaa the competent authority has, under sub-section (1) of section ff of the said Act, submitted report to the Government;

And whereas, the Central Government has, after considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified In the schedule appended! to this notification.

Now, whereas, in exercise of the .powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the •Section 8 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired for laying the pipelines and In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of that section, the Central Government directs that the right 'of user In the said lands shall, instead of vesting in the Central Government, vest on this date of the publication of this declaration in the Oil and Natural GBB •Commission, free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

Far Laying Pipeline from K-62 tcK-49 (Main Collector Line).

State—Gujarat D i s t .- Mehsana Talukn'.—Kadi

Village

Hectare

S.No.

Are. P. Are.

0

12

100

64 JVMBAOPURA

[No- 29/6/88-IOC/Lab. &Legis.]

New Delhi, the 25th August 1989

S.O, 3510.—Whereas (by a notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals S.O. No. 2377 dated 7th June, 1B69 under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of •User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Government declared Its inten- sion to acquire the Bight of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines;

And whereas the competent authority has, under sub-section (1) of section 6

•of the said Act, submitted report to the Government;

And whereas, the Central Government has, after considering the said report, 'decided to acquire the right of user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification;

Now, whereas, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the "Section 6 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification is hereby acquired ft>r laying the pipelines and In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of that section, the Central Government directs that the right •erf user in the said lands shall Instead of vesting in the Central Government vest on this date of the publication of this declaration In the Oil and Natural Gaa {Commission free from all encumbrances.

SCHEDULE

For laying Pipelinefrctn Junction Pcim 10 C.I ,F.

S t a t e - G u j a r at Dist.—Mehsana Taluka—Kalol

S.No.

Hectare

Are Village

P.Are.

0

SAU

0 0

0

0

9 4 12 3 0 16 T

00 75 10

0 0 0

II

0

.0 0

0 0

2

0

50 10 26 7'* 462 475 476/1 484 • 485 483/1 . . . . .. 462/2 . . , , ,. 482/1 483/1B . 482/4 488/1/5- . ' . 488/1/6

4

Village

Hectare

Arc. T Arc S.No.

0

•SAIJ— contd.

r> .6

2

25 94 00 *.o 6T fr.7

57 1 9 26 7

si

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

If16

0

';

0 r

0

7O 00 00 60 70 60

O

- 92

5 >5 9 4 3 7 15 3

0 ro

.488/1/4 489/1A 490/1 , . . . . 490/2 49i 4 9 3 /2 ~ . . .. 553/1 553/3 553/2 55^ 548/2 548/3 . . . - . 549, 547/2 547/4 547/3 . . 542 547/5 54*/2 539/a V . P. C a rt t r a ct . . .. 662/4

6 6 2 /3 6 6 2 /2

40 00 16 40 CQ 70

6 < 5 i /2 . . .. 6 6 1 /1 . ..

. .

50 34

6 6 O /1 . ..

. .

658 653 6 5 4 / iC . . .. V . P. C a r t' . r a ck . . ..

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

6 8 1 /2 . . . .. 6 8 1 /i 6 H lh . . . .. < 5 " i /4 . . .. 6 82

90 26 00 96 00 00 00 50 so 60

6 8 1 5 /4 . . ..

7, 0 6 5 3 10 17 18 1 2 I 4 4 3 t } 4 [ 4

. ..

3 1 1

19 1

5

¹

25 50 50 20 *5 50 00 20 78 52 70 00

• .

6$6li 6H6/Z . . . • • , 6 8 8 (3 f Wa , . 6SHu . . , . .. 690/3 ficio/2 712/2 . . . " . V.P. Cart track 700/1 . . .. 696/2 696/1 697/A 699

1 2 12 . . . ..

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

50 \o S8 00 70

. . ..

23 13 i5 6 8 5

.. .

50 20

ir

1 1

c 0 0 0 0

5" 50 70

I 2 I 6 / P. L

35

INo. 29/5/88-IOC/Lab. & Letfs-T

M. V. S. PRASADA HAU, Uuder Secy.

MINISTRY OF HEALTH, FAMILY PLANNING, WORlts, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

(Department of Health)

New Delhi, the 21st August 1069

S.O. 3520.—Whereas in pursuance of the provisions of clause (d) of section S of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), Dr. K. Narayana Pal, Professor of Medicine, Medical College, Trivandrum-11, has been elected by the University of Kera'a to be a member of the Dental Council with effect from the 17th July. 1969;

And whereas, in pursuance of the provisions of clause (e) of section 3 of the said Act, the following persons have been nominated by the State Governments specified against their names to bo members of the said Council with effect from the date of nomination shown against each, namely:—

Particular of Member Name of the State which

Date of nomination

nominated him

1. Dr. M. P. Dutta, LMF (SMF), West Bengal

3-7-1969 L.D.S. (S-M.F-). Assistant professor, Dr. R. Ahmed, Dental college and Hospital, Calcutta.

Mysore

2. Dr. Sangameswar Sardar,

16-9-106a Z-D.S. (Vienna) Old Cot- tonpct, Raichur (Mysore State)

Now, therefore, in pursuance at Section 3 of the said Act, the Central Govern- ment hereby directs that Dr. M. P. Dutta LMF(SMF), L.D.S. (SMF), Assistant Professor, Dr. R. Ahmed, Dental College and Hospital, Calcutta, shall continue, to bei a member of the Dental Council of India and makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Health No. F.3-2/62-MII, dated the 17th October, 1962, namely:—

In the said notification:—

(i) under the heading "Elected under clause (d) of Section 3", for the entry against serial No. 9, the following entry shall be substituted, namely:—

"Dr. K. Narayana Pal, Professor of Medicine, Medical College, Tri- vandrum-11."

(ii) under the heading "Nominated under clause (e) of Section 3", for the entry against serial No. 12 the following entry shall be substituted, namely:—

"Dr. Sangameswar Sardar, 2DS (Vienna), Old Cottonpet, Raichur, Mysore State".

[No. F.3-9/89-MPT.J

New Delhi, the 23rd August 1969

S.O. 35X1.—Whereas in pursuance of the provisions of clause (b) of sub-sec- tion (1) of section 3 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956), Dr. R. N- Sen, D. Phil, Principal, Veer Surendra Sal Medical College, Burla, District Sambalpur (Orlssa), has been elected by the Sambalpur University, Sambalpur, to be a member of the Medical Council of India with effect from the 27th June, 1969;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makeg the following further amendments In the

notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Health No. 5-13/59-MI, dated the 9th January, I960, namely:—

In the said notification, under the heading "Elected under clause (b) of sub- section (1) of section 3", after serial number 38 and the entry relating thereto, the following serial number and entry shall be inserted, namely :—

"40. Dr. R. N. Sen, D.Phil, Principal, Veer Surendra Sai Medical Collage, Burla, District Sambalpur (Orissa)".

[No. F. 4-29/68-MPT.}

ORDER

Neyj Delhi, the 22nd August 1999

SO 3522.—Whereas by the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Health No. 17-22/59-MPT, dated the 1st April, I960, the Central Government has directed that the Medical, qualification, "M.D." granted by the University of Tubengln, Germany shall be recognised medical qualification for the purposes of the Indian Medical Council Act 1956 (102 of 1956);

And whereas Dr. Schempp Irmgard Marie Use, who possesses the said qualifica- tions is for the time being attached to the B.E.M. Hospital, Udipi, S. K. Mysore State, for the purposes of charitable work;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (c) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby specifies,—

(i) a period of two years from the date of the publication of this order In the Official Gazette, or

(ii) the period during which Dr. Schempp Irmgard Marie Use is attached to the said B.E.M. Hospital, Udipi, S.K. Mysore State,

•whichever is shorter, as the period to which the medical practice by the aforesaid . . doctor shall be limited,

[No. F.19-29/69-MPT.]

R. MURTHI, Under Secy.

(Department of Health)

New Delhi, the 26th August 1969

S.O. 3523.—Whereas in pursuance of clause (d) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (37 of 1934), the Central Government has re-nominated Shri S. Ramaswamy (Development Officer, Oils and Food) and now Officer on Special Duty (FoocQ in the Directorate General, of Technical Development, New Delhi, as a member of the Central Committee lor Food Standards representing the Ministry of Industrial Development, Internal Trade and Company Affairs (Department of Industrial Development), New Delhi;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section S of the said Act, the Central Government hereby directs that Shri S. R&maswamy shall continue to be a member of the Central Committee for Food Standards,

[No. F. 14-45/69-PH.]

M. C. JAIN, Under Secy.

(Department of Works, Housing and Urban Development)

New Delhi, the 26th, August, 1989

S.O. 3525.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Pre- mises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958 (32 of 1958), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the Notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Works, Housing and Supply S.O. 307 dated the 28th January, 1959, namely:—

In the table below the said Notification:—•

(i) in column 1, against serial number 10, for the word "Calcutta", the following shall be substituted, namely:—

"Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta and Orissa, Calcutta";

(li) in column 1, against the serial number 11, for the word "Simla", the word "Patiala" shall be substituted;

(iii) in column 1, against the serial number 12, the word "Cochin" shall be omitted and after the Word 'Madras', the following shall be inserted, namely:—

"Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta and Qrissa, Calcutta";

[No. F. 21011(4)/66-Pol.]

S.O. 3536.—-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958 (32 of 1958) the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column (1) of the table- below, being Gazetted Officers of Government, to be estate officers for the pur- poses of the said Act who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties imposed on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction In respect of the public premises SDeclflad In the corresponding entries in column (2) of the said table.

THE TABLE

Designation of officer

Categories of public premises and loca-

limits of juu'sdiction

(t)

(a)

)

he administrative control 0 ax Department within th their respective jurisdiction

t

J ~] ricmis(.s under the administrative control ©• 1. Commissioner of Income 2. Commissioner of Income-it. ....^.jn.. 3. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ernakulam- 4. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad. 5. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhubneswar. 6. Commissioner of Income-tax, Nagpur. 7. Commissioner of Income-tax, Kanpur. 8. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore. 9. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad. V the Central Excise Department within th 1 loi.aj limits of their respective jurisdiction lo. Collector of Central Excise, Nagpur. n. Collector of Custom and Central Excise,

Panaji

12. Collector of Central Excise, Poona. 13. Collector of Central Excise, West Bengal,

] I'l tinmen under the administrative : ontrol o- y the Central Excise Department within _tn> 1 local limits of their respective jurisdiction Calcutta.

14. Chief Chemist, Centra' Revenue Control

Laboratory, Delhi.

J

[No. F. 21011(4)/68-Pol.rV.] S.O. 3527.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) .Act, 1958 (32 of 1958), the Central Govern- ment hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column (1) of the table below, be- ing Gazetted Officer of Government to Ibe estate officer for the purposes of the said Act who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties im- posed on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of his jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified in the corresponding entry In column (2) of the said table.

TH£ TABLE

Categories of public premises and local limi Designation of ofllccr

of jurisdiction

CO

0)

xecutivc Engineer, Chandigarh Central Divi- s i o n, CP.W.D.;, Chandigarh.

Vremisis belonging to or taken on lease or re- quisitioned by, or on tehalf of the Central Gov- ernment within thcU';ion Territory of Chacdi • gurh.

[No. F. 21Oll(4)/66-Pol.] S.O. 3528.—-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Pre- mises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 3958 (32 of 1958), the Central Government hereby appoints the officer mentioned in column (1) of tho table be- low, being the officer equivalent to the rank of a Gazetted Officer of Government to be an estate officer for the purposes of the said Act, and the said officer shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties Imposed on estate officers by or under the said Act In respect of the public premises specified in column (2) of the said table.

THE TABLK

Dedgnittion of officer

Categories of put He premises and local limils -

of jurisdiction.

(0

(a)

Chief Administrative Ofnccr-fum-Secretarv,

Askoka Hotel, New Delhi

Public premises owned or acquired or hired by the Ashoka Hotel and which are under the ad- ministrative control of the Managing Director,,. Ashoka Hotel.

[No. P. 2l011(4)/66-Pol.IV.l

S.O. 3529.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Pre- mises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants¹) Aft, iy58 (32 of 1958), the Central Government hereby appoints the officers mentioned In column (1) of the table below, being the officers equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officers of Govern- ment to be estute officers for the purposes of the said Act who shall exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties Imposed on estate officers by or under the said Act within the local limits of their jurisdiction in respect of the public premises specified In the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said table.

THE TABT-R

Categories of public premises and Ircnl limit Designation of officer

of jurisdiction

( 2)

0)

T. Chief linginecr, Hindustan Antibiotics Limi-

ted, Pimpri, Poona.

Premises under the administrative conTitl of the Hindustan Antibiotics Limited, Pinrpri, Poona sit-.jated within fhe local l'mits of ihe'r respective jurisdiction.

2. Depucv Superintendent, Enr'occring (S) Hindustan Antibiotics Limited, Pinipri, Poona.

3. Assistant Superintendent. Tini^ncerir,';

(Civil), Hindustan A-itibi iii;s, 1 .imiteti, Pinpri,

Poona.

[No. F. 21011 (4)/66-Pol.IV.]

T. K, BALAStJBRAMANIAM,

Deputy Director of Kstates & Ex-offlcio XJnder Secy.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

(P. & T. Board)

New Delhi the 2'Ith August 1969

S.O. 5530..'—In pursuance oi' para (a) of Section III of Rule 434 of Indian Tele- graph Rules, 1951. as introduced by S,O. No. 627, dated 8th March, 1980, the Director-General, Posls and Telegr^Dhs, hereby specifies the 1st October J969, as the dale on which the Measured Rate System will be introduced in GUNTAKAL Telephone Exchange, Andhra PraJ ,:;h Circle.

[No. 5-46/6£LPHB(5).] D. R. DAHL.

Assistant Director General (PHB).

MINISTRY OF LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT AND REHABILITATION

(Department of Labour & Employment)

New Delhi, the 22vd August 1969

S.O. 3533.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 73F of the ^Employees' State Insurance Act, 1!)48 (34 of 1948), the Centra] Government, having regard to the location of the Government Press, Pondicherry, in an implemented area, hereby exempts the said press from the payment of the employer's special contribution leviable under Chapter VA of the said Act for a period of one year with eilect from the 21st July, 19G8 upto and inclusive of the 20th July, 1970.

[No. 6(49)/69-HL]

New Delhi,, the 29th August 19(30

S.O. 3533.—Whereas the Central Government was satisfied that (1) Maharashtra State Electricity Board and (2) Stone Crusher Shri A. K, Shaikh Kuvarbao were situated m Karad and Ratnugiri areas whi^h were sparse areas (that is, areas •whose insuL'able population were less than 500) in the districts of North Satara and Ratnatfiri in the State of Maharashtra;

And, whereas by virtue of their location in spaise areas, the aforesaid factories were granted exemption, from the payment of the employer's special contribution under section 73F of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 194ft (34 of 1&48), until enioi cement of the provisions of Chapter V of the Act in those areas by the Central Government in the notification 01 the Government of India in the late Ministry of Labour and Employment No. S.O. 2843, dated the 24th September, 1963;

And whereas the Ceniral Government it satisfied that the in"nrt>bla popula- tion of the Karad and Ratna^iri arens m the districts of N01 th Satara and Ratnagiri in the State gf Maharashtra has now exceeded 500, and these are no longer sparse areas;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 73F of the Employees' Stat~ Insurance Act, 194S (34 of 1948), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the said notification, namely:—•

In the Schedule to the said notification,—

(i against Serial No. 9, the entry "Karad" in column 3 and the entry relating thereto in column 4 shall be omitted;

(ii; against Serial No. 13, the entry "Rataagiri" in column 3 and the entry relating thereto in column 4 shall be omitted.

[No. F. 6/4,'68-HI.]

S.O. 3534.—Whereas the Central Government was satisfied that M/s, Risen Seva Mandal was situated in Ratnagiri area which was a sparse area (that is an area whose insurable population was less than 500) in the district of Ratnagiri in the State of Maharashtra;

And, whereas by virtue of its location in a sparse area, the aforesaid factory- was granted exemption from the payment of the employer's special contribution under section 73F of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1943 (34 of 1948) until "nforcement of th eprovisions of Chapter V of the Act in that area by the Central Government in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employ- ment) No. 5O. 801, dated the 9th March, 1989;

And, whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the insurable copula- tion of the Ratnagiri area in the district of Ratnagiri in the State of Maharashtra has now exceeded 50O, and it ie no longer a sparse area;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 73F of the Tiinployees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of HH8), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in- the "aid notification, namely:— In the Schedule to the said notification, against Serial No. 6, the entry "Ratnagiri" in column 3 and the corresponding entry in column < shall be omitted.

(No. F. C/4/6fl-HLJ

S.O. 8535.—Whereas the Central Government was satisfied that (1) M/s. Barve and Altai Stone Crusher and (2) M/s. New Trio Builders were situated in Murgud and Karsd areas which were sparse areas (that is, areas whose insurable popula- tion were less than 500) in the districts of Kolhapur and Worth Satara in the Slate of Maharashtra;

And whereas by virtue of their location in sparse areas, the aforesald. factonr"; were granted exempt from the payment of the employer's special contri- bution under section 73F of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), i"ntil enforcement of the provisions of Chapter V of the Act in those areas by the Central Government m the notification of the Government of India in the late Ministry of Labour and Employment No. S.O. 3304, dated the 21st November, 19C3;

And whereas the Central Government is satisfied that the insurable popula- tion of the Murgud and Karad areas in the districts of Kolhapur and North Satara in the State of Maharashtra has now exceeded 500, and these are no longer sparse areas;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred bv section 73F of the Employee?' Slate Insurance Act 1248 (34 of 1948), the'Central Government hereby makes the following further amendment in the said notification, namely—

In the Schedule to the said notification,—

(i"i against Serial No 6, Ihe entry "Murpud" in column 3 and the entry" relating thereto in column 4 shall be omitted;

(ii) Serial No. 8 a-nd the entries relating thereto shall be omitted.

[No, F. 6/4/69-HI \

S.O. 3536.—Whereas the Central Government was satisfied that M/s. Modern Builders Engineer and Contractors (Kankavli) was situated in Ratnagirl area which was a sparse area¹ (that is, an area whose insurable population was less than ,E00) in the district of Ratnagiri in the State of Maharashtra;

CORRIGENDUM

New Delhi, the 26th. August, 1969

S.O. 3538.—In the Schedule to the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Emp'oyment) No. SO 2293 dated the 5th June, 1969, published at page 2422 of the Gazette of India, Part II Section 3(il), In the Schedule, for "Ladhu" read "Ladnun."

[No. F. 6(ll)/68-HI.]

DALJIT SINGH, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour and Employment) New Delhi, the 23rd August 1969

S.O. 3540.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1847 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Delhi in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Allahabad Bank Limited and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 18th August, 1969.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, DELHI

PRESENT:

Shri R. K. Baweja, Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Delhi

The 2nd August 1969 CG. I.D. No. 9 OF 1968 BETWEEN

The employers in relation to the Allahabad Bank Limited, Chandni Chowk, Delhi,

AND

Their workman, Shri Amar Singh Rathore, as represented by the Delhi State Bank Employees' Association, 898, Nai Sarak, Chandni Chowk, Delhi.

Shri G. P. Tandon—for the bank/management. Shri C. L. Bhardwaj—/or the workman/union.

AWARD

By S.O. No. 23/61/68-LRIII, dated the 10th of October, 1968, the Central Government, In the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Depart- ment of Labour and Employment), referred the following industrial dispute existing between the aforesaid parties for adjudication to this Tribunal ;—

"Whether the action of the Agent, Allahabad Bank Limited, Chandni Chowk, Delhi in terminating the services of Shri Amar Singh Rathore peon with effect from the 26th April, 1068 was legal and justified? If not, to what relief Is the workman entitled?"

2. After some evidence of the parties had been concluded, they reported havln? arrived at an amicable settlement and a memorandum of settlement was jointlv filed by Shrl C. L. Bhardwaj alongwith Shrl Amar Singh Rathore workman con- cerned and Shri G P. Tandon on behalf of the management. Both the above- named parties verified the terms of the settlement Annexure "A" and sought ?n award in terms thereof, I, therefore, pass an award in terms of the settlement Annexure "A" which shall form part of the award.

2nd August, 1069.

(Sd.) R. K. BAWEJA,

Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Delhi.

ANNEXURE "A"

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, DELHI

REFERENCE NO. 9 OF 1968

In the matter of an industrial dispute.

BETWEEN

The Management of the Allahabad Bank, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-6.—Employers.

AND

Its workman Shrl Amar Singh Rathore, Ex-peon as represented by the Delhi State Bank Employees Association, 398, Nai Sarak, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-6.—Workman.

Request for making a Compromise Award

May it please the Honourable Tribunal, The employers herein respectfully submit that upon a request having been made to them on behalf of the workman concerned in the present dispute, the parties have arrived at a compromise on terms and conditions as set out hereunder in full and final settlemennl of the dispute and accordingly it is prayed that the Honourable Tribunal may be pleased to pass an Award in terms of the aforesaid compromise.

Terms of Compromise ;

1. The workman, Shri Amar Singh Rathore, will apply to the Bank for a fresh appointment against a permanent vacancy in the subordinate cadre within a period of 15 days hereof-

2- Within '60 days of the application being received from Shri Amar Singh Rathore, the Bank shall offer him subject to Clauses 3, 4 and 5 below, a fresh appointment against a permanent vacancy of a peon or peon-cum-farrash or in any other suitable post in the subordinate cadre in any Branch In India, such appointment in the first instance being far a probationary period of six months on expiry of which his confirmation to the permanent establishment of the Bank will be considered provided his work and conduct are found to be satisfactory in the interim.

3. Shri Amar Singh Rathore will be required to produce a medical certificate of fitness from a Medical Practitioner approved by the Bank and will also submit an acceptable prooi of his date of birth. He will also get himself suitably introduced to the Bank 'by a person, firm or organisation known to the Bank.

4. No travelling expenses will be payable by the Bank in respect of the journey of Shri Amar Singh Rathore to the place of his fresh appointment.

5. By virtue 01 the arrangement made hcreina'jo¹ e, the workman will retain no claim whatsoever against the Bank in respect of his past service in the Bank.

Dated at Delhi this 21st day of July, One thousand nine hundred and sixty nine-

For the Allahabad Bank,

3d./-

Manager, Cbandnl Chowk, Delhi.

The terms of compromise as set out hereinabove have been approved by me .and I request the Honourable Tribunal to pass an. award in the aforesaid terms.

For the Delhi State Bank Employees Association,

(nd.) C. L. B BlIARDWAJ,

President.

21-7-69. [No- 23/61/68-LRIIL]

ORDER

New Delhi, the 23rd August 1969

S.O. 3541.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial -dispute exists between the employers In relation to the National and Grlndlays Bank Limited and their workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) of action 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of the National and Grlndlays Bank Limited, Calcutta in refusing to treat the period of service of Shri Samar Bahadur Singh from the 29th July 1968 onwards as a probationer subordinate staff and terminating his services with effect from the 24th March, 1969 is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

[No. 23/53/69-LRIII.]

S. S. SAHASRANAMAN, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour and Employment)

New Delhi, the 26th August 1969

S.O. 3542.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Hindustan Lalpeth Colliery, Post •Office, Chandrapur (District Chandrapur) and their workmen, which was received ±>y the Central Government on the 19th August, 1969.

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT NAGPUR

REFERENCE (CGT) NO. 4 or 1969

PRESENT :

Shrl G. V. Deo, B.A., LL.B-, Presiding Officer

PARTIES :

Hindustan Lalpeth Colliery, Chandrapur

Vs.

Its Workmen.

APPKAHENCES :

For Employer.—Shri L. M. Chatterjee, Authorised Representative. For Workmen.—Absent.

STATE; Maharashtra

INDUSTRY; Coal-

Nagpur dated the lltPi August, 1969

AWARD

This is a reference made by the Central Government under Section 10(1) (d) otr the Industrial Disputes, Act, 1947 for adjudication of a dispute between the Man- agement of Hindustan Lalpeth Colliery, Chandrapur and Its Workmen over the- fo] low-ing demands.

"Whether, having regard to the financial capacity of the Hindustan Lalpetb- Colliery, Post Office Chandrapur, District Chandrapur, the action of the management—

(1) in not paying the arrears of wages for the period from 15th August,.

1967 to 27th January 1968;

(ii) in not paying the variable dearness allowance with effect from ths 1st April, 1968; and

(iii) in not granting graded annual increments from the 15th August, 1968;

as per recommendations of the Wage Board for Coal Mining Industry is justified?

If not—

(i) what should be the quantum of variable dearness allowance In this- colliery?

(ii) to what reliefs if any, entitled?"

2. Since both the parties did not file their statement of demand within the- prepcribed time, the matter was fixed for hearing on 8th August 1969. An applica- tion was received from Shri C. G. Arya, Branch Secretary, Rashtriya Koyarla Khadan Kamgar Sangh, Chandrapur, on 1st August 1969, wherein it was stated that since the issues in dispute were settled, the reference may be treated as closed- On 8

3- On 8th August 1969, Shrl C. M. Chatterjee appeared for the concern. Ncr appearance for thp Union. The Union states In its application that the dispute has been amicably settled and the reference mav be treated as closed. Shri Chatterjee¹ who is present has also no objection for reference being treated as disposed of.

4- In view of the above no Award could be made and the reference stand*- disposed of.

Sd/- G. V. DEO, Nagpur dated llth August, 1969.

Presiding Officer. [No. l/65/G8,LRII/p

S.O. S543.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award oi the (Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, In the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Patmohana Colliery, Post Office, .Sitarampur, District Burdwan and their workmen, which was received by the (Central Government on 21st August, 1969.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

REFERENCE NO. 38 OF 1969

LPARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Patmohana Colliery

AND

Their workmen,

IFRESINT:

Shri B. N. Banerjee, Presiding Officer.

. APPEARANCE •

On behalf of •) Employers [ On behalf of f A b s e nt Workman. J

.STATE: West Bengal

INDUSTRY: Coal Mines.

AWARD

By Order No. 6/7/69-LRII, dated April 15, 1069, the Government of India, in "the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department oi Labour ,and Employment), referred the following industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Patmohana Colliery and their workmen, to this 'Tribunal, for adjudication, namely: —

"Whether the suspension of Shri Deonandan Rajbhar, Miner of No. 2 Pit from the 17th September, 1968 by the management of Patmohana Colliery, Post Office Sitarampur, District Burdwan was justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. The disputing parties did not file their written statements. They did not rappear on the date fixed for settling the date of hearing. The peremptory date of hearing was fixed in the absence of the parties and they were informed by regis- tered post. To-day, the date of peremptory hearing, nobody appeared. I presume, in these circumstances, that there is no subsisting dispute between the parties now- 1, therefore, record a 'no dispute' award.

Dated, August 19th, 1969.

Sd/- B. N. BANERJEE,

Presiding Officer. [No. 6/7/69-LRII.]

S.O. 3544.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Aet, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the •Central Government Industrial Tribunal, (No. 3) Dhanbad, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Jamadoba Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron -and Steel Company Limited, Post Office Jealgora (Dhunbad) and their workmen, 'which wai received by the Central Government on the 12th August, 1969.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO- 2}'

AT DHANBAD

PRESENT

Shrl Nandagiri Venkata Rao, Presiding Officer.

REFERENCE NO. 4 OF 1967

In the matter of an Industrial dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial¹ Disputes Act, 1947.

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the Jamadoba Colliery ot Messrs Tata Iron & Steel.' Company Limited, Post office Jealgora (Dhanbad).

AND

Their workmen

APPEARANCES:

On behalf of the employers.—Shrl S. S. Mukherjee, Advocate. On behalf of the workmen.—Shrl B. N. Sharma, President, Congress Mazdoor- Sangh.

STATE ; Bihar

INDUSTRY : CoaL

Dhanbad 7th August, 1969

AWARD

The Central Government, being of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Jamadoba Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron, and Steel Company Limited. Post office Jealgora (Dhanbad) and their workmen,, by its order No. 2/12/67-LRII dated 20th April, 1967 referred to this Tribunal under Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication the- dispute In respect of the matters specified In the schedule annexed thereto. The schedule is extracted below:

SCHEDOXE

"(I) Whether the suspension ol Shrl Man Bahadur, Watchman, for ten days;

with effect from the 26th November, 1966 and his transfer fronr Jamadoba Colliery to Malkera Colliery with effect from the 10tb December, 1966 toy the management of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel' Company Limited, were justified?

(ii) If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. Employers as well as the workmen filed their statement of demands.

3- On 20th June, 1989 Shrl B. N. Sharma, President, Congress Mazdoor Sangh* the union sponsoring the dispute has filed an application stating that the dispute involved in the reference has been settled, that there is no dl-rmite calling for ad- judication, that the workmen do not want to proceed further with the present refer- ence and that no dispute Award be made. As no more dispute subsists for adjudi- cation, no further enquiry is necessary. The award is made accordingly and* submitted under Section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

(Sd.) N. VENKATA RAO,

Presiding Officer,

Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. 2),

Dhanbad.

[No. 2/12/67-LRIL]

S.O. 3545.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947). the Central Government hereby publiwhes the following award of the* Central Government Industrial Tribunal. No. 3 Dhanbad In the industrial dlspute- between the employers In relation to the Kenduadlh Colliery, belonging to Messrs Huxrlladih Coal Company, Limited, Post Office, Bhaga, District Dhanbad end their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 19th August,, 1M9.

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 3)

At DHANBAD

REFERENCE NO. 75 or 1368

PRESENT:

Shri Sachldanand Sinha, M.A-M.L., Presiding Officer.

PARTIES ;

Employers In relation to the management o£ Kenduadih Colliery and their workmen.

APPEARANCE&¹

For workmen.—Shrl b a n k er Bose; Secretary, Colliery Mazdoor Sangh.

2. Sri P. B. Choudhury, for Colliery Stall Association and 3. Sri Mahatam Singh, Khan Mazdoor Congress. For employers—Shrl S. S. Kapur, Advocate.

INDUSTRY: Coal

STATE: Bihar.

Dhanbad, Dated the 21st 0/ July, 1960

INTERIM AWARD

1. The Central Government, by its order No. 1/13/66-LRII dated the 19th January, 1967 and published in the Gazette of India under notification No. S.O. 322 dated the 28th of February, 1967 referred for adjudication the dispute in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule annexed thereto. The Schedule is extracted below: —

SCHEDULE

1. Whether the action of the management of Kendwadih Colliery belonging to Messrs Hurrlladih Coal Company, Limited, Post Office Bhaga (Dhan- bad) in closing the colliery with effect from the 24th October, 1966, was Justified?

2. If so, whether they are justified in offering compensation to the affected workmen under section 25 FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)?

3. What relief are the workmen entitled?"

2. The management .in their written statement alleged inter alia that their action in closing the colliery with effect from 24th October 1966 is bonaflde and genuine and hence the present dispute is not an industrial dispute at all and as there can- not be an industrial dispute in respect of a bonafide closure of an undertaking. According to the management since closure of the colliery was for bonaf.de and genuine reasons, for circumstances beyond their control and hence the management was justified in offering compensation to the affected workmen under section 25 FFF (Proviso) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

3. Three sets of written statements were filed on behalf 01 the workmen (i) workmen represented by the Union Colliery Staff Association (11} workmen repre- sented by the Union Khan Mazdoor Congress and (ill) workmen represented by the Union Colliery Mazdoor Sangh.

4. Their case In brief is that this is a valid reference Inasmuch a3 It is not the closure Itself which is in dispute but whether this closure is for unavoidable circumstances as alleged by the management or not. Their case is that the manage- ment was not justified in offering retrenchment compensation to their workmen under section 25 FFF (Proviso) of the Industrial Disputes Act on the closure of the colliery with effect from 24th October, 1966 and the workmen are entitled to be paid compensation under section 25F, Clause B of the Act

5. The employers in their written statement have raised issue that the present reference is not an Industrial dispute and prayed that at first the preliminary ob- jection raised by them be heard first. I therefore, take up the question oi the validity of the reference as raised by th" employers in their written statement aa their preliminary objection.

6. In this case the Kenduadih colliery was closed with effect from the 24th of October, 1986 and the reference was made by the notification dated 19th at January, 1967 i.e. after the closure of the mine.

7. The term 'closure' has not been defined In the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- The term, therefore, has to be understood in its ordinary connotation. A closure which Is a mere pretence of closure Is no closure in the eye of law. In Banaras Ice Factory's case, the Supreme Court observed 'If there is no real closure, but a mere pretence of a closure or It is mala fide there is no closure in the eye of law and the workmen can raise an industrial dispute."' But in the later case of Tea Districts Labour Association the Supreme Court Affirmed that in case of a pretence of Closure, no closure in fact takes place. However, with respect to a mala fide closure the Court glossed upon its obsrvations and clarified that "the observations are not to be read as laying down an unqualified and categorical proposition of law that whenever a closure is mala fide, it must be deemed to be unreal and non-existent". Then on the facts of the case, the court held that when the establishment in question had in fact been closed It was difficult to see how the finding of mala fide could justify the conclusion that the establishments should be deemed to continue. Therefore, once there is a real and factual closure the mala fides or bona fides of the closure is not relevant. Hence It Is not open to the tribunal to go into the motives of the employers in closing down hi3 business and the question of motive in such a case would be irrelevant.

8. In Indian Metal and Metallurgical Corporation case [1952(I).L.LJ-, 364], the Madras High Court pointed out that the right to carry on business or not to carry on business was a right protected by the Constitution. The Supreme Court also accepted the view that the right to carry on a business was business was protected by the Constitution and the exercise of that right in closing down the business can- not be prevented. The Immediate effect of the decision was that non-employment following closure was left without any relief. To meet the situation, the Govern- ment rushed with an ordinance which later became an Act by which compensation was made payable in cases of unemployment following closure. Compensation was made payable at a certain rate; a lower ceiling wa3, however, prescribed for those •bases where closure was forced upon the employer by circumstances over which he had no control.

9. It is a fundamental right of a citizen to carry on or dose clown business, industry or work if he so chooses and nobody can be compelled to carry on against his will. Therefore, the closure being the exercise of a right granted by the Consti- tution, tribunal cannot examine the bona fides of the closure.

10. On behalf of the employers it was submitted before me that a reference with reference to an Industrial dispute relating to an industry which has become dead on account of closure shall be invalid, as the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act apply only to an existing or live industry and in this connection they have cited the case of Hind Shippers Ltd. V. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, reported in 1988 Lib. I.e. 851. In that case their Lordship observed as under:

"Where the business has been closed, any dispute with reference thereto will fall outside the ambit and purview of the Industrial Disputes Act. After the closure there is no Industry In existence and therefore, a reference made by the Central Government under section 10(l)(d) In regard to compensation payable as a result ot the closure and based on a notifi- cation issued after the closure is beyond the competence of the Central Government." In that case Pipratch Sugar Mills' case and Tea Districts Labour Association's case were referred to and relied upon.

11. It is now well established principle in Industrial Law that there could be no Industrial dispute with regard to a business, which was not In existence. The indus- trial dispute to which the provisions of the Act qpply is only one which arises out of an existing industry. Where business has been closed and closure Is real and bona fide_., any dispute relating thereto arising after the closure, is outside the purview of the Act. Therefore, there can bo no reference in respect of that indus- try.

12. The leading case on the subject Is Pipralch Sugar Mill's case reported in A I R. 1957, Supreme Court, page 95. In that case the dispute relates to a claim which arose while the industry was in existence and between persons who stood in the relationship of employer and employees. In that case V. Ayyar J. observed "We think that on a true construction of section 3, the power of the State t0 make a reference under that section must be determined with refernece not to the date on which it Is made b.ut to the date on which the right which is the subject-matter of the dispute arises, and that the machinery provided under the Act would be available for working out the rights which had accrued prior to the dissolution of the business."

13. There is a clear distinction between the two classes of cases, namely, (1) those in which the cause of action arose at the time when the business had been closed; and (ii) those in which the cause of action arose at the time when the business was being still carried on. There can be no industrial dispute in respect of the first category of cases, because the real subject-matter of the dispute has ceased to exist when the dispute arises. But in regard to the second category where the dispute actually arised before the closure of the business, It does not cease to be an industrial dispute merely because subsequently the industry is closed. There is no provision of law according to which the closure of industry extinguishes the industrial dispute which has arisen before such closure. The relevant time Is the time to which the dispute relates- In other words, if the dispute relates to a period when the Industry was In existence, the reference, even after the closure of the industry, can be validly made.

14. Closure being the exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution, tribu- nals cannot exumlne the bona fides oi the closure. But the bona fides of the closure may be examined for ascertaining the measure o* compensation. The tribunal may consider the question whether the closure was forced upon the employer, for the purpose of determining whether the lower ceiling of compnsatlon should be allow- ed. I may refer to the Kallnga Tubes, Ltd.'s case reported in 1969 (I)L.L.J., page 557. In that case it was held that the management closed down Its principal under- taking of manufacturing and selling iron pipes and poles on 3rd October, 1967. Thereupon their Lordship considered the question whether the undertaking was closed for "any reason whatsoever" or it was "on account of unavoidable circum- stances" beyond the control of the employer. Considering the entire facts and circumstances their Lordship came to the conclusion that the closure of the under- taking was due to unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the appellant and therefore, the compensation would be payable as if the undertaking was closed down "for any reason whatsover" within section 95FFF (1) of the Act.

15. In the present reference also we have to consider whether the closure was -or unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the management. The point for determination is whether the workmen are entitled to get retrenchment com- pensation under the proviso under section 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act or whether they are entitled to be paid compensation under section 25 F(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

16. The same issue was also before their Lordship in the Kallnga Tubes, Ltd.'s case.

17- Moreover, it is a dispute arising simultaneously with the closure of the industry and on the extension of the same principle as laid down in Plpraich Sugar Mills' ease, can also be validly referred.

18. For all these reasons I am of the opinion that the management has failed to show that the present reference was not an industrial dispute. That being so, reference made by the Government is valid.

19. It may be submitted to the Central Government under section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

(Sd.) SACHIDACJAND SINHA, Presiding Officer.

LNo. 1/13/66-LRIL]

New Delhi the 27th August 1969

S.O. 3546.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 <14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Prasonno Dutta Kajora Colliery, Post Office Kajora:gram, District Burdwan and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 19th August, 1969.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

REFERENCE NO, 35 OF 1969.

PARTIES •

Employers in relation to the management of Prasonno Dutta Kajora Colliery,

AND

Their workmen.

PRESENT :

Shrl B. N. Banerjee, Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES:

On behalf of Employers—Abifr.L. On behalf of Workmen—Shri R S. Azad General Secretary, Khan Shramik Congress.

STATE: West Bengal.

INDUUSTRY: Coal Mines.

AWARD

By Order No. 6|127|68-LRII, dated April 9, 1969, the Government of India, in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employment), referred the following Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Prasonno Dutta Kajora C°Uiery and their workmen, to this Tribunal, for adjudication, namely:

"Whether the management of Prasonno Dutta Kajora Colliery, Post Office Kajoragram, District Burdwan was justified in not paying sick wages from the 2nd September, 1968 to the 10th September, 1968 to Shri Gama Kahar, Pick Miner and stopping him from work with effect from the 11th September, 1968? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. The employer colliery' adopted an attitude of strange non-cooperation with the Tribunal from the beginning. It did not file written statement in time. After the date had arrived for settlement of peremptory date Of hearing, the manage- ment woke up and wrote a letter asking for time to file written statement, on the following ground:

"In view of the absence of the dealing clerk to attend for knowing the date and time to be fixed by yQur Honour for hearing the afoove Reference No. 35 of 1969 ease, which may kindly be directed to your office to intimate me by letter, furthermore, I be^ to stnte that replies of the W.S. of above reference is not yet ready, dye to our Legal Advisor Is out of station, so further 3 weeks time is solicited."

Apart from the clumsiness of the language used, the ground pleaded is flimsy. Even then, this Tribunal fixed the peremptory date of hearing for July 31, 1969, with liberty to the management to file their written statement before that date. Two days prior to the date of peremptory hearing, the management filed a writ- ten statement but did not care to appear on the date of peremptory hearing. All that it did was to send an unsworn and unverified apphcaiion asking for adjournment of the peremptory hearing on the ground of manager's illness. For reason elaborately stated in the order, dated July 31, 1969, this Tribunal granted time subject to the payment of costs, as condition precedent to further participa- tion of the management in the reference, and the case was adjourned to August 1. 1969.

3. The management did not pay the costs, as was stated before me by Mr. B. S. Azad, appearing for the Khan Shramik Congress, the trade union of the work- men. It did not even appear today, that is to say on 11th August, 1969. In the aforesaid circumstances, the tribunal proceeded ex-parte.

4. It appears from Ext. 4, the chargesheet served upon the concerned work- man by the management, that the workman was charged with two-fold miscon- duct to the following language:

"You are absenting from your duty since 2nd September 1968 without any information or permission.

This ifl a mia-conduct. Further on the 12th September '68 you abused and threatened Ayub Mia, Haulage Khalasi saying that what happened to Kail Babu will happen to you. This is another serious misconduct.

You are suspended pending enquiry. Please explain within 48 hours."

To the above charges, the workman sent the following reply, Ext. 5:

"That the allegation which you have mentioned falsely in your above chart;esheet that you are absenting from your duty since 2-9-68, is totally false and baseless. I have reported to you and the colliery Doc- tor on 2-9-68, regarding mv sickness. I also requested, your colliery Doctor for my treatment But sorry that under your instruction the colliery Doctor refused to make any treatment, in my above sickness. Thus I waa bound to take the help of local doctor and under him I

was treated from 2-9-68 to 10-9-68. I approached before you and requested for my above job on 11-9-68 with the fit certificate of the said local doctor. But you totally denied to give my job. Thus I was bound to approach before you in written Regd. letter dt. 12-9- 6S in which I requested for my original job but still you have not provided me my original job. Thus the question of misconduct does- not arise at all.

Further I have left the organisation of the union of the Colliery Mazdoor Salbha and joined the organisation of the union of Khan Shramik Congress union. Thus you became displeased. I am also the active member of the said Khan Shramik Congress union and have taken part to organise the above union. Moreover the said Ayub Mia la the right hand of the leader of Sri Kalyan Roy of the colliery Maz- door Sobha Union. So being instigated by the said leader Sri Roy, you have charged me falsely that you abused and threatened Ayub Mia. So it is totally false and baseless. I have never abused or threatened Sri Ayuta Mia so the question of serious misconduct ia totally meaningless."

Admittedly, no enquiry was held into the charges with notice to the workman.

It is stated in paragraph 10 of the written statement filed by the management:

"10. ***This employer states that the aforesaid acts of the workman con- cerned are serious misconduct under the relevant rules and contract governing the service conditions of the workman concerned and aa he failed to explain and|or appear before the management of hi& aforesaid acts duly recorded in the said charge sheet, the services of the workman, concerned ia deemed and|or liable to have been terminated."

It is also stated in paragraph 13 of the written statement:

"13. This employer states that the workman was suspended pending enquiry and thereafter on the failure of the workman to explain and|or at- tend before the management within 48 hours as requested under the aforesaid chargesheet the services of the workman is deemed and|or liable to have been permitted."

5. The concerned workman himself deposed in this case. According to hia evidence he fell ill on 2nd September, 1968, but cound not get himself treated by the colliery doctor. On the advice of the colliery doctor himself, he approached a private doctor of the name of Dr. Satkarl Pati Mukherjeo and got himself treated by him. When he waa confined to bed, undergoing treatment, he did not send any application for leave to the Management. When he got round, he approached the management for permission to rejoin, with a fitness certificate from Dr. Mukherjee. He was not allowed to rejoin. He was thereafter charged, as stated before. He replied to the chargesheet, denying the charges, but there was, he said, no enquiry held into the charges.

6. Thus the position is that from September 1968 till to-day the workman is under suspension on charges of misconduct, without any enquiry. He has not also been penalised on proof of the charges.

7. The idea of the management that a workman, who does not explain hia conduct within 48 hours, may be dismissed without an enauiry does not find support from anywhere. Moreover, it anoears from the evidence of the work- man that charpesheot dated September 16. 1968, was served upon the workman on September 25, 1068. It was not, therefore, possible for the workman to reply within 48 hours. Further, under clause 17 of the certified Standing Orders of the management, there is a provision for payment of subsistance allowance dur- ing, suspension couched in the following language:

"17(1) A workman may be susoended or fined sutoiect to the provisions of payment of Wages Act, 1936 or hh increment may be stopped or he may be demoted or dismissed without notice if he is found to be guilty of misconduct provided that suspension without pay as punish- ment shall not exceed ten days. The workman may be suspended" pending departmental enquiry and in such cases he shall be Daid a subsistance allowance equni to half of his wages as defined In the payment of Wages Act. 1936. for the period of ausnpnsion upto 30 days this aubsi3tance allowance will be at the rate of 314 of his wages as aforesaid but If the enquiry is delayed beyond 30 days because

of the workman, the subsistence allowance shall be reduced to 1|4 of his wages.***"

The same clause enjoins the employer to complete the enquiry within 10 days. In the instant case, the enquiry has been kept pending for too long a period. Jn the fitness of things, I must direct its completion now within a reasonable period, I must also direct payment of subsistance allowance to the workman according to the provisions of clause 17(1) of the Standing Orders of the colliery.

8. The award that I make, therefore, is that the management of Prasonno Dutta Kajora Colliery was justified in stopping the concerned workman from work in the sense of suspending him from work with effect from 11th September, 1968, but they were wrong in keeping him indefinitely suspended or stopped lrom work. The enquiry into the misconduct, during which he was kept suspended, must now commence within a fortnight from the date of publication this award. It must he completed within a reasonable time not exceeding one month, in any -event. If as a result of the enquiry it be found that the workman was really .sick, he must be pa-id his sick wages during the period from 2nd September, 1968, to 10th September, 1968. Such sick wages shall be calculated at half the wages (basic and dearness) for the entire period. In making this award I draw inspiration from the provisions in the award given in Colliery Dispute Arbitra- tion by Shri A. Das Gupta. If the result of the enquiry goes against the WOI-K- man and if it be found that he was guilty of the charges, he will be entitled only ,to the subsistence allowance according to clause 17 (i) of the Standing Order of the colliery from 2nd September, 1968, till the final order is parsed on the work, man. If, on the other hand, he be found innocent of the charges, he would be •entitled to reinstatement, sick wages during September 2 to September 11, 1968 and his full wages during the period of his enforced idleness thereafter.

This is my award.

(Sd.) B, N. BANERJEE, Dated, August 13, 1969,

Presiding Officer. [No, 6/127/68-LRII.]

New Delhi, the 28th August 1969

S.O. 3547.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 -of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad in the industrial dispute bet- ween the employers in relation to the management of Dalmla Dadrl Cement Limited, Charkhi Dadri and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 20th August, 1969.

BEFORE SHRI P. N. THUKRAL, PRESIDING OFFICER. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (CENTRAL) AT FARIDABAD

REFERENCE NO. 7/C OF 1969

BETWEEN

The workmen and the Management of M/s, Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited, Charkhi Dadri.

PRESFNT :

Sarvashri Sagar Ram Gupta and Bhim Sain-—for the workmen. Shri V, ^taushik—for the management,

AWARD

Shrl Chuni Lal Quarry Chowkidar was in the service of M/s. Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited, Charkhi Dadri. His services were terminated and this gave rise to an industrial dispute. The Central Government In exercise of the powers con- ferred by Section 7A and clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947, constituted his Industrial Tribunal with Headquarters at Faridabad and referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide Government of India Gazette Notification No. 36/27/68-LRI, dated 14th October, 1968: —

Whether the action of the manasement of Dalmia Dadri Cement Limited in terminating the employment of Shri Chuni Lal Quarry Chowkidar with effect from the 30th June, 1968, was justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?

It Is not necessary to decide the case on merit. A compromise has been reached between the parties and as a gesture of good will the management have agreed to take the claimant Shri Chuni Lal concerned workman on duty with Immediate effect as Chowkidar-crum-Points man or any other job in category 'D'. It has been agreed that the workman would not be entitled to back wages or any other benefit except continuity of service lor the purpose of seniority and this concession will not be taken as precedent. I give my award accordingly. No order as to costs.

Sd/- P. N. THUKHAL,

Presiding Officer,.

Central Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad.

Dated the 11th August, 1969.

FORM 'H'

Memorandum of Settlement

(Under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947)

1. The Management of Messrs. Dalmla Dadri Cement Name of parties:

Ltd., Charkhi Dadri

and 2. The Workmen of Quarries, represented by the-

Dalmia Dadri Cement Factory Mens Union.

I. Shri Vishnu Kumar, Secretary, Dalmia Dadri Representing Management:

Cement Ltd.

2. Shri Virendra Kaushik, Legal Adviser, Dalmia Dadri"

Cement Ltd.

1. Shri Bhlm Sen Prabhakar, President, Dalmia Dadri-- Representing Workmen \

Cement Factory Mens Union,

2. Shri Madan Lal Gupta, General Secretary, Dalmia-

Dadrl Cement Factory Mens Union.

Recital of the case

The case of Shri Chunni Lal is pending before the Central Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad. The parties discussed the matter to settle the same mutually and have agreed as under: —

It is agreed between the parties that as a gesture of good will Sh. Chunni Lal concerned workman in reference No. 7-C of 1969 will be taken on duty with immediate effect as Chowkidar-crum-Points man or on any other job in category 'D'.- However, he will not be entitled for back wages or any other benefit except con- tinuity of service for the purpose of seniority but it will not be taken as precedent- Charkhi-Dadri 5th August, 1969: —

Representative of the Workmen Representatives of the Management 1. (Sd.) BHIM SEN PARBHAKAR, 7. (Sd,) VISHNU KUMAR, President.

Secrstary. Dalmia Dadri Cenment Factory Dalmia Dadri Cenment Ltd,, Mens Union.

2. (Sd.) MADAN LAL GUPTA,

2. (Sd,) VIRENDER KAUSHIK, General Secretary.

Legal Adviser.

Witnesses:

(Sd,) Illegible. (Sd.) Illegible.

LNo. 38(27)/68-LRIV.]'

S.O. 3548.—In pursuance of section. 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, No. 3, Dhanbad, in the industrial dispute between •the employers In relation to the Selected Fatka Colliery, Post Office Nirshachatti, .District Dhanbad and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govern- meni on the 19th August, 1969.

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 3) AT DHANBAD

REFERENCE NO. 12 OF 1969

PRESENT;

Shri Sachidanand Sinha, M.A.M.L., Presiding Officer.

PARTIES .

Employers in relation to the Selected Fatka Colliery,

Vs.

Their workmen.

APPEARANCES :

For employers:—Shri T. R. Agarwala, Director & Nominated Owner. For workmen: —Shri K. K. Mookherjee, General Secretary, Nlrsha Thana

Coal-field & workshop workers Union.

INDUSTRY: Coal

STATE: Bihar.

Dhanbad, dated the 12th of August, 1969 AWARD

1. The Central Government, being of opinion that an industrial dispute exists .between the employer in relation to the Selected Fatka Colliery, Post Office— JJirehachatti District Dhanbad and their workmen, by its order No. 2/254/68-LRII dated the 4tn of February, 1969 referred to this Tribunal under section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication the dispute in respect of the matters specified in the schedule annexed thereto. The schedule is extracted below:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Selected Fatka Colliery, Post Office Nirsha- chatti, District Dhanbad, was justified in dismissing from service their workman Shri Barun Mandal, Trammer, with effect from the 29th May, 1968? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?" 2- Both the employers and the Union representing the workmen filed their written statements. But it is unnecessary to state the respective cases of the parties because the dispute has now been settled amicably. They have filed a compromise petition at annexure 'A¹. According to the terms of the compromise the services of the concerned workman Sri Barun Mandal will be treated as re- trenched with effect from 29th May, 1968 and that the concerned workman shall be paid retrenchment compensation as per section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which comes to Rs. 500.00 (Rupees Five hundred only) and that the aforesaid payment shall be made to the workman on or before 8th August, 1969.

'.i. The terms of compromise are fair and reasonable and the same are accepted. Accordingly an award fe made In-terms of the Joint petition of compromise at annexure 'A' which shall form part of the award. It may now be submitted to the Central Government under section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Sd/- SACHIDANAND SINHA,

Presiding Officer-

BEFORE, THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 3), DHANBAD

REFERENCE NO. 12 OF 1969

FAHTtEH .

Employers in relation to Selected Fatka colliery of M/s. Sri Krishna colliery-

Co. (P) Ltd., P.O. Nirshachatti District Dhanbad.

AND Their Workmen—Shri Barun Mandal.

Without prejudice to the respective contentions of the parties, the above refer- ence has been amicably settled on the following

Terms:

(1) That the services of the workman Sri Barun Mandal will be treated as retrenched with effect from 29th May, 1968.

(Z) That the workman shall be paid retrenchment Compensation as per section 23 F ol the Industrial Disputes Art, 1947 which comes to Rs. 500 00 (Rupees Five hundred only).

i3) That the above payment a^ mentioned in Item No. 2 shall be made to the workman on or before 8th August, 1989.

(4) That, the parties will bear their own respective Costs ol their proceedings. (51 That, in view of the terms as stated above, there does not exist any dispute between the parties which needs further adjudication by the Hon'ble Tribunal.

It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this settlement may kindly be recorded and an Award passed in terms thereof.

For workman

For Employers

(Thumb Impression) of

BAKUN MANDAL,

T. R. AGARWALA, Workman Director & Nominated Owner M/s. Sri Krishna¹ colliery Co. (P) Ltd.

Selected Fatka colliery (Sd.) K. K. MOOKHERJKE, P.O. Nirshachatti. General Secretary Dist. Dhanbad. 5-8-60.

Nirsha Thana Coal-fleld & Workshop workers Union P.O. Nlrshacbattl, Dist. Dhanbad.

5-8-69.

[No. 2/254/68-LRIL]

New Delhi, the 30th August 1969

S O. 3549.—Tn pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the Benedlh Colliery of Messrs Benedih Coal Concern, Post Office Nudkhurkee, District Dhanbad, and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 19th August, 1969. BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL DHANBAD.

In the matter of a reference under Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

REFERENCE NO. 10 or 1969

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to Benedih Colliery

AND

Their workmen represented by the Bihar Koyla Mazdoor Sabha-

PRESENT :

Shri Kamla Sahai, Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES :

For the Emploi/er— Shri S. R. Mukherjee For the Workmen—Shri Lalit Burman, General Secretary.

STATK: Bihar.

INDUSTRY: Coal.

Dhandbad, the 12th August, 1969.

AWARD

By order No. 2/33/69-LRII dated the 20th March, 1969, the Central Govern- ment, in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation, has made this reference to this Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute which has been described In the schedule as follows .•

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Benedih Colliery of MesSrs Benedih Coal Concern, Post Office Nudkhurkee, District Dhanbad, was justified in dismissing Shri Nandu Bhar, Miner, with effect from the 6th Septem- ber, 1968? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

The parties have entered into a compromise and have settled their dispute- As I have stated in my order, the compromise appears to be fair. The manage- ment has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000/- to the workman, Sun Nandu Bharr as compensation and ex-gratia payment and also his legal dues, if any. The- management has further agreed to employ the workman when coal relating in No. 12 seam incline is re-started. The workman has agreed that ho will have no other claim upon the management. I accept the compromise.

I direct that the reference be disposed of in terms of the compromise petition which will form part of this award. Let a copy of this award be sent to the Central Government under Section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act.

(Sd.) KAMLA SAHAI,

Presiding Officer-

BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL

TRIBUNAL NO. 1 DHANBAD.

REFERENCE- NO. 10 OF 1969

PARTIES :

Employers In relation to Benedih Colliery.

AND

Their Workman.

Joint Petition of Compromise

The parties above named beg to submit that the parties have settled the dispute amicably on the following terms :

Terms of Settlement

I. That the management of Benedih Colliery hereby agree to pay to the con- cerned workman Sree Nandu Bhar as sum of Rs. 1,000/- Rupees One Thousand, only as compensation and Ex-gratia payment for the period of idleness from 6th September, 1968 till date- Over and above this the workman will be paid his outstanding legal dues, if any.

That the management also agree to give employment to the workmar Sree Nandu Bhar as and when the work of coal raising will be resumed in No. 12 seam incline.

3. That the payment as per Clause (1) to the concerned workman shall be made within a month from date of this settlement.

4. That the workman shall have no other claim from the management except as specifically mentioned above and the dispute stands resolved.

The parties pray that the Honourable Tribunal may be pleased to pass an award on the basis of above terms of settlement.

Dated 12th August, I960- For the workman.

For the Employers: For Benedih Coal Concern. (Sd.) Illegible,

Partner LALIT BARMAN, General Secretary. Benedih Coal Concern- Bihar Koyla Mazdoor Sabha. Benedih Colliery.

[No- 2/33/69-LRIL]

S.O. 3550.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, in the industrial dispute between the employers in relation to the management of Prasonna Dutta Kajora Colliery, Post Office Kajoragram, District Burdwan and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on the 23rd August, 1969.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CAI.CTJTTA

REFERENCL NO. 22 or 1969

.PAHTILS '

Employers in relation to the Frosonna Dutta Kajora Colliery,

AND

Their workmen.

PRhfcENT :

Shri B. N. Banerjee, Presiding Officer.

Vs.

APPEARANCES :

On behalf of Employers-—Absent On behalf of Workmen.—Shn B. S- A^ad, General Secretary, Khan Shramik Congress-

SiATr: West Bengal.

[NDUSTHY: Coal Mines

AWARD

By Order No. 6/128/68-LKI1, dated February 10, 1969, the Government of "India, In the Ministry oi Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employment), referred the following dispute between the employers an relation to Prosonna Dutta Kajora Colliery and their workmen, to this Tribunal, •for adjudication;

"Whether the management of Prosonna Dutta Kajora Colliery, Post Office Kajoragram, District Burdwan was justified in terminating the ser- vices of Shri Sukharl Singh with effect from the 22nd September, 1968? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2. On receipt of notices to file their respective written statements, the parties •did not file any. Thereupon, May 26, I960, was fixed as the date for setting a peremptory date of hearing, by an order, dated May 12, 1969- On May 26, 1969, Mr. B- S. Azad, General Secretary of the trade union of the workmen appeared for the workman but nobody appeared for the management, In the aforesaid circum- stances, the tribunal fixed the date of peremptory hearing on June 4, 1969 and Informed the management of the date by registered post.

3. On the same day, the trade union of the workmen made an application pray- ing for issue of summons upon the management for production of certain docu- ments before the tribunal- The application was allowed and summons were issued-

4. Also on the same day, the workmen filed their written statement- On June -}, 1969, one day prior to the date fixed for hearing, there was an application made >on behalf of the workmen asking for adjournment of the hearing. The applica- tion was rejected. On the date fixed for hearing nobody w as ready to go on with •the case. Thereupon, I passed the following order:

"The attitude exhibited by the parties to this reference is strongly non- cooperative. The management has not filed its written statement nor has It cared to appear. The workmen have filed their written state- ment. But yesterday, Mr- Azad, General Secretary of the union, filed an application for adjournment on the ground of alleged illness of the workman. That application I rejected, knowinp full well how glibly such applications are made. Even then no body is ready to go on with the case to-day."

The matter was thereupon fixed for peremptory hearing on August 18 1969, and parties: were informed accordingly.

5- On August 14, 1969, the management woke up and sent by post an applica- tion praying for one week's adjournment to file written statement, Since nobody rame to move the application and since no excuse was given for the delay, I rejected the application- At the peremptory heaTinR to-day, Mr, B S. Azad, Gfneril Secretary of the Iradi union representing the workman, appeared but •nobody appeared for the management.

6. The attitude exhibited by Prosonna Dutta Kajora Colliery has been through- out non-cooperative- In Reference No. 14 of 1969, I tried to pull up the manage- •meni for dilatory conduct, by directing payment of costs but thai

had not the desired result and the reference was to be decided ex-jparte, On June 26, 1969. I again tried the same modus operandi In Reference No. 35 of 1909 but that also failed and the reference was decided ex-parte.

7. In these circumstances, It Is useless to wait for the management any .further and I proceed to decide the reference ex-parte.

8. According to the written statement filed on behalf of the workmen, the concerned workman was a permanent workman in the colliery. To prove this fact, the trade union of the workman called for certain documents from the management. One was the register in Form I, which would have shown that the workman was a permanent workman for about the 13 or 14 years. This document was not produced. Neither in the Bonus Cards (Ext. 4 series) nor in the Coal Mines Provident Fund Annual Statement of Accounts (Ext. 3 series), is the workman described as a temporary or probationery workman. The work- man himself deposed as witness in this case and he stated that he was a perma- nent workman.

9. According to clause 3(b) of the Standing Order of the employer company a 'permanent' workman is one who is appointed for an unlimited period or who- has satisfactorily put in three months' continuous service in a permanent post as- a probationer. The ex-parte evidence in the case is such that th£ workman was a permanent workman.

10. It appears from Ext. 1, the letter of termination dated September 22, 1968, that the services of the workman was terminated In the following language:

"As your work is unsatisfactory, the management is hereby terminating yout services from the date of this letter.

Please collect your dues, if any and vacate the quarters."

This Is much too offhand style of termination of services of a permanent work- man. The workman protested against his dismissal In the following language;

"*I beg to state that I am not a probationer Undg. Trammer. I am work- ing in your above colliery since long permanently and regularly with- out any blemish. I have also done my duties with the full satisfac- tion or my superiors. So the question of that 'your work Is unsatis- factory' does not arise at all.

*°I am the active member of the Khan Shramik Congress Union. Thus you became displeased and unnecessarily harassed me by stopping my work from 25th September, 1968 with a false and baseless termina- tion letter dt. 22nd September, 1968 without any reason. So this type of wrongful stoppage of work by a Illegal termination tetter is wholly unfair, unjust and victimisation in natural Justice."

No reply appears to have been sent to this letter.

11. On the evidence I must hold that the management of Prosonna Dutta Kajora Colliery was not justified in terminating the services of Shri Sukharf Singh with effect from 22nd September, 1968.

12. According to the workman he was throughout unemployed during the entire period of his forced Idleness. He Is, therefore, entitled to his back wage until reinstatement, which I direct must be made within one week of the publication of this award.

This Is my award.

Sd./- B N- BANERJEE, Presiding Officer

Dated, August 19, 19S9.

[No. 6/28/68-LRII.T

S.O. 3551.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta frr the Industrial dispute bet- ween the employers in relation to the management of Bankola Colliery, Post Office Ukhra, District Burdwan and their workmen, which WBT received by the' Central Government pn the 25th of August, I969¹.

CENTRAL, GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

REFERENCE. NO. 39 OF 1969

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the management of Bankola Colliery,

AND

Their workmen.

PRESENT;

Shrl B. N. Benerjee—Presiding Officer.

APPEARANCES;

On behalf of Employers.—Shrl S. B. Sanyal, Legal Adviser, Bihar Organisa- tion of Industrial Employers.

On behalj 0/ Workpnen,—Shri Tarun Kumar Sanyal, Advocate.

STATE: West Bengal

INDUSTRY: Coal Mines

AWARD

By Order No. 6/21/69-LRII, dated April 30, 1969, the Government of India, in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour and Employment), referred the following Industrial dispute between, the manage- ment of Bankola Colliery and their jvorkmen, to this tribunal, for adjudication, namely:

"Whether Md. Ishak Mian, Guard, had been unjustifiably stopped from work with effect from the 17th July, 1968 by the management of Bankola Colliery, Post Office Ukhra, District Burdwan? If 30, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

2- The management and the concerned workman both filed their written state- ments. At the hearing, however, the parties settled the dispute and filed a peti- tion of compromise. Now that the dispute has been settled, I pass an award in terms of the settlement. Let the petition of settlement form part of his award.

Doted, August 20, 1969-

(Sd.) B. N. BANERJEE,

Presiding Officer.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,

CALCUTTA

REFERENCE NO. 39 or 1969

Employers in relation to the Bankola Colliery, P.O. Ukhra, District Burdwan,

Vs.

Their workmen The joint petition on behalf of the workmen and the management most respectfully

SHEWETH

1- That the parties have settled their dispute and difference on the following terms:

(a) The workman withdraws his allegations against the management.

(b) The management by way of good gesture agrees to give the workman some regular job on the surface of the colliery within 15 days from to-day. The job however will not be piece-rated one;.

(cl The management shall not retrench him within two years from to-day except for circumstances beyond the control of the management.

(d) The workman shall work subject to all rules, regulations and certified Standing order pertaining to the establishment.

(e) The workman has no other claim whatsoever against the management.

It is therefore prayed that a consent award be made in terms stated above or your Lordship may pass such other order or orders as to your Lordships appear fit and proper.

Dated, August 20, I960.

(Sd.j S. B. SANYAL,

Authorised Legal Adviser,

Bihar Organisation oi Industrial

Employers For Employers.

(Sd.) S. K. SINGH,

Supt. (It) Bankola Advocate Authorised by the

workmen.

(MU. Isaque Khan alias Mian)

Workmen

[No. 6/21/69-LRII.l S.O. 3552.—In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (14 of 1047), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, (No. 3), Dbanbad, in the Industrial dis- pute botween the employers in relation to the Central Angarpathra Colliery of Messrs Central Angarpathra Colliery Company, Post Office Sijua, District Dhan- bad and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government on 19th August. 1969.

THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 3) AT DHANBAD,

KEJERENCI No. 36 OF 1968

PRESENT:

Shri Sachidanand Sinha, M.A.M.L —Presiding Officer,

PARTIES :

Employers in relation to the Central Angarpathra Colliery.

V*. Their workmen.

APPEAMANCES :

For employers-—Shri R. D. Sachdeva, Owner. For the workmen,—Sri Prasanta Burman, General Secretary,

INDUSTRY: Coal.

STATE,: Bihar.

Dhanbad. Dated the 12th of August, 1989.

AWARD

1. The Central Government, being of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Central Angarpathra Colliery of Messrs Central Angarpathra Colliery Company, Post Office Sijua, District Dhanbad and their workmen, by its order No, 2/105/66-LRII dated the 18th of August, 1966 referred to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad under section 10(1) (d'l of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication the dispute In res- pect of the matters specified in the Schedule annexed thereto. The Schedule is extracted below:

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the management of the Central Angarpathra Colliery of Messrs Central Angarpathra Colliery Company. Post Office Silua, District Dhanbad, was justified in dismissing Shri Ram Saran Singh, Truck Driver, from service with effect from the 21st February, 1966?, If not, to what relief, is the workman entitled?

(2) Whether the management of the said colliery was justified in trans- ferring Shri S. D. Mishra. Register Clerk, as Loading Clerk with

effect from the 7th February, 1966 and refusing employment to him subsequently with effect from the 10th March, 1966? If not what re- lief Is the workman entitled?

(3) Whether the mana£ement of the said colliery was justifled in refusing employment to workmen, whose names and designations are detailed below, with effect from the dates mentioned against their respective names? If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled?

Names of the workmen w ho have

S.No

Designation

Date Irom which re- fused employment been refused employment

I 2

Fitter Misiry General Mazdoor Depot \* "ri.er

3 4

Do. Do. D o.

Mining Sirdai Attendance Cleik U.t.Tr. mmei Depot wi/rkir

6 7 H 9 10 II

T2

'3 14 T5 16 T7 TS

ShriHarkhoo Rajak ShriHaroo Mahato Shri Rambriksha Nunia Shml. Subhagia Kamin Shri Huri Charan Saw ,, Nanhak Mahal 0 ,, Sital Bania . . .. ,. D w a r i ka P r a i ad Hdi.n ., E u k h i M u h a to ,, MahuHr Nunia ,, Chanarik Nunia „ Raidco Nunia . . .. ,, Shri Sitarani Numu . ,, Jagdr" Nimiu . ,, Pcnwr, Ki min Smt. Koily Kaolin . Smt. Hhtgia Kamin Smt. Ramrajia Kamin Shri DcocharanBhuain ,

J9

20

21

22

²3 24 25 26

Do. D o. Do. Do Do. no. D o. D o. Muni Do no. D o. D o. D o. no. D o. D o.

27 28

no.D o.

D o. D o. Trammer

Do.

HariEhuiin ., Ramdco Hhuian ,, Ram Prasrd Bhuian ,, KlwariBbuian j, Chhou-n fihuian ,, RhmDhcLniUhuicin ,, Heoki Bhuisn . „ lihagirath Mah. . ,, Daulat A^.phat" ,, Somar A/Uharo ,, Gopal Mahato . ,, BhatooMuhato ,, PuyagMahato. „ Mugarm Mahato ,, Al.C. Goswami

Attendance clerk

23-3-66 23-3-66 i_l-2-66 14-2-66 14-2-66 14-2-66 5-2-66 23-2-66 T/|-2-66 21-2-66 Do. E r. Do. Do. Do D o. D o. D. • 24-1-66 D o. Do. Do. Do. Do- Do. Do. 1T-I-66- D o. D o. D o. Do. D i. Do. 2-2-66 29 30 3i 32 33 34

2. Tlie Central Government Industrial Tribunal. Dhanbad registered the refer- ence as reference No. 127 of 1966 on its file. While it was pending there the Cen- tral Government by Its order No. 8/25/67 LBII dated the 8th of May, 1967 trans- ferred 1he dispute to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad where it was registered as reference No. 165 of 1967. The Central Government, by its [subsequent order No. 8/71/68-LEII dated the 13th of August, 1968 trans- ferred (he dispute to this tribunal and here it has been renumbered as reference No. 36 of 1968.

3. S ( P. Bu.-man, General Secretary, Bihar Koyala Mazdoor Sabha filed written

statement on 7th October, 1906, on behalf of the workmen. Sri R. D. Sachdeva, Owner liled the written statement on the 25th of April, 1968 on behalf of the manage rient.

4. Tl e parties negotiated the dispute and have settled it amicably and hence It is ui¹ necessary to state the respective eaaes of the parties. The parties have filed a }->int petition dated 5th August, 1969, on the 12th of August, 1969 to effect that this v have amicably settled the dispute and all the concerned workmen have received their lull and final payment and that there is no further pending dispute between the parties which needs further adjudication by this Tribunal. This, petition dated 5th August. 1969 Is duly verified by Shri R. D. Sachdeva, Owner on behalf eC the employers and by Sri P, Burman, General Secretary, Bihar Koyala Mazdoor Sabha on behalf of the workmen. Sri R. D Sachdeva, Owner and Sri PrasanU Burman. General Secretary representing the workmen concerned appear- ed befcne me in porson and they have submitted that the dispute has been ami- cably settled and that at present n<-> dispute exists "eelween the parties.

5. In these circumstances I find that no dispute exists between the parties and I record a "No DISPUTE" award between the parties. It may now be sub- mitted to the Central Government under section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

(Sd.) SACHIDANAND SINHA,

Presiding Officer. [No. 2/105/68-LRII,]

S.O. 3553.—In pursuance of .section 17 of the Industrial Disputes -Act 1947 (14 oJ! 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the following award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, (No. 2) Dhanbad, m the industrial dis- pute between the employers in relation to the Jamadoba Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Post Office Jealgora (Dhanbad) and their work- men, which was received by the Central Government on the 21st August, 1969.

BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO 2) AT DHANBAD.

PRESENT :

Shrl Nandafiirl Venkata Rao.-- Presiding Officer.

RWEHENCE No. 7 OF 1907

In the matter of an industrial dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947.

PARTIES :

Employers In relatlan to the Jamadoba Collier} of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Post Office Jealgora (Dhfcnbad).

AND

Their workmen

APPEARANCES:

On behalf of the employers.—Shri L, H. Parvatiyar—Le^al Assistant. Ore behalf of the workmen.— Shri H. N. Singh, Vice President, Koyala Maz- door Panchayat.

Dhanbad, the 16th August 1969

ST^TE ; Bihar.

INDUSTRY- Coal.

AWARD

The Central Government, being of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Jamadoba Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Post office Jealgora (Dhanbad) and their workmen. by its order No. 2 (50)/67-LRII dated 1st May, 1967, referred to this Tribunal under Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication the dispute in respect of the matters specified in the schedule annexed thereto. The schedule is extracted below:

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Jamadoba Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited. Post office Jealgora (Dhanbad) were justified in terminating the Hen on the appointment of Shri Bipat, Miner and placing his name In the Barlli Hit with effect from the 14th Decem- ber, 1966? If not, to what relief is the workmen entitled?"

2. The workmen filed their statement of demands, and the employers also filed their statement of demands cum rejoinder.

3 Shri Bipat (hereinafter referred to as the affected workman) was a miner in Jamadoba colliery of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the employers). He proceeded on granted leave of 21 days from 7th Novem- ber 1966 and he was to report to duty on 28th November, 1966. But he did not renort on or before the date. He reported at the colliery on 26th December, 1966, when he was told that he had lost his lien on his permanent job as a miner and hi" name was placed on the badll list with effect from 14th December, 1966. These W*t8 are not in dispute. The case of the workmen Is that having gone home

00 7th November, 1966, the affected workman fell sick on 21st November, 1966, and as such he sent a registered letter to the management with a medical certi- ficate and also a certificate from the mukhiya of Gram Panchayat. But the management neither extended the leave nor sent any reply. The affected work- man also submitted an application on 28th December, 1966, but no favourable action was taken on it. Hence, the workmen pleaded that forfeiting^ the lien of the affected workman on his permanent post was Illegal and unjustified. The employers denied that they had received any letter for extension of leave along with the medical and other certificates as contended by the workmen and that they were justified under the Standing Orders in terminating the lien of the affected workman on his permanent post and placing him on the badli list with "ffect from 14th December, 1966, as per their letter dated 13th/14th December, 1966. The workmen were represented by Shrl H. N. Singh, Vice President, Koyala Maz- rioor Pi.mch.ayat and the employeis by Shri L. H. Parvatiyar, Legal Assistant. On admission by the employers Exts. W. 1 to W4 for the workmen and on admission '13- the workmen Exts. Ml and M2 for the employers were marked. On behalf of the workmen the affected workman was examined as WW.l and Exts. W5 to W7 were marked. For the employers also a witness was examined and Exts. M3 rind M4 were marked.

4. It is an admitted case of the parties that the effected workman went on sanctioned leave of 21 days on 7th November, 1966, he was to report to duty on J8th November, 1066, but he did not report to duty on or before 28th November, 1966, or within 8 days of the expiry of the leave. The only fact pleaded by the workmen is that on 21st November, 1966, the affected workman sent a letter by -i registered post accompanied by a medical certificate and a certificate from the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat for extension of leave. This fact was categori- cally denied in the statement of the employers in para 9. Thus, the onus was lying on the workmen to prove the fact. WW.l is the affected workman. His evidence is that on 21st November, 1966, he sent an application for extension of leave to the Manager as well as to the Assistant Manager accompanied by a certi- ficate from the State dispensary aad a certificate from the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayet and that the postal receipt for the letter sent by him to the Manager is Ext. W. 5- No postal receipt la either referred to or produced in respect of the alleged letter sent by the ailected workman to the Asstt. Manager. No postal acknowledgement is produced for either of the letters. In the cross-examination the alfected workman was emphatic In deposing that he had sent both the regis- tered letters to Jamadoba colliery and denied the suggestion that he had not sent any application to Jamadoba Colliery by registered post. Ext. W5 is a postal ieceipt showing that the registered letter was sent to the Manager, Bhowra Colliery. The date in the postal stamp on the receipt, Ext. W5 also does not appear to be as 21st November, 1966, It appears as 2lst November, 1948. Whatever that be, the receipt is in respect of letter sent by a registered post to the Manager, Bhowra col- dery and not Jamadoba colliery with which the affected workman was concerned. 'No other witness viz., the Doctor of the State dispansary or Mukhiya of Gram Pan- chayat or any other person is examined to show that the affected workman had really sent an application by a registered post for extension of his leave to the Manager of Jamadoba colliery. As shown by Ext. Ml, which is an admitted docu- ment, the affected workman was granted the leave by the Manager of Jamadoba colliery, Thus, there is no evidence that before the expiry of the leave granted the affected workman had sent any application for extension of leave. Clause 9 of the Standing Orders, Ext. M2 provides that a workman will loose his lien on his ap- pointment In case he does not join his duty within 8 days of the expiry ol his leave. As per the clause the question of submission of his explanation for not returning before the expiry of the leave arises only if he returns within 8 days of "the expiry of the leave with the explanation and his return after 8 days of the expiry of the leave and submission of explanation Is beyond the point and haa no relevancy, Under similar circumstances the Supreme Court has pointed out in National Engineering Industries Ltd., Jaipur —Vs.—Ilanuman (1967-II-L.L.J S8H) "where therefore a Standing Order provides that a workman would loose hia lien on his appointment, if he does not join his duty within certain time after his leave expires, which can only mean that his service stands automatically termi- nated when the contingency happens". In this view the alleged application of the affected workman HciWi 28th December. 1966 or his offer of explanation with it were belated When the termination of the lien ig automatic non receipt of the dismissal letter Kxt M3 by the affected workman is also of no consequences. The employers had taken the plea regarding sustain ability of the reference con- tending that it wa.i 1 * espousei"¹ by a representative union. But this point was not pressed by the employers at the time of arguments.

5. I, therefore, hold that the management of Jamadoba colliery of Messrs Tata* Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., P.O. Jealgora (Dhanbad) were justified in terminating the lien on the appointment of the affected workman, Shri Blpat, Miner and plac- ing his name in the badll list with effect from the 14th December, 1966, and con- sequently, he Is not entitled to any relief. The award Is made accordingly and submitted under Section 15 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Sd./- N. V-ENKATA RAQ,

Presiding Officer,

Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad- [No. 2/50/67-LRII.]

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 20th August 1969

S.O. 3554.—Whereas an industrial dispute exists between the employers in rela- tion to the Bhurkunda Colliery of National Coal Development Corporation Limited, Post Bhurkunda, District Hazaribagh (Bihar) and their workmen represented by the Coal Workers' Union, Bhurkunda Branch, Post Bhurkunda, District Hazaribagh (Bihar);

And whereas the said employers and their workmen have by a wriUen agree- ment, In pursuance of the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 10A of the Indus- trial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), referred the said dispute to arbitration by the person specified therein, and a copy of the said arbitration agreement has bovn forwarded to the Central Government;

Now, therefore, in pursuance of the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 10A Of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby publishes the said arbitration agreement which was received by it on the 25th. July, 1969.

FORM 'C

Agreement

(Under Section 10-A of the Industrial Disputes Act 1917)

NAME OF PARTIES:

Representing Employer—Dy Supdt. of Collieries,/Agent Bhurkunda Colliery,

N.C.D.C.

Representing Workman—Secretary, Coal Workers' Union Bhurkunda Branch. It is hereby agreed between the parties to refer the following industrial dispute to the arbitration of Sri O. Venkatachalam, Chief Labour Commissioner (Central). Shram Shakti Bhavan. Ran Marjr. New Delhi.

(i) Specific matters in dispute: (ii) Details of Lhe parties to the dispute Including the name and address of the establishment or undertaking involved: Establishment;

(ill) Name of the Union, If any, re- presenting the workmen in question:

(iv) Total number of workman em- ployed in the undertaking affected.

(v) Estimated number of workmen affected or likelv to be adect- ed by the dispute:

As per enclosure. Dy Supdt. of Collieries, Bhurkunda, N.C.D.C. & Coal Workers' Union, Bhur- kunda.

Bhurkunda Colliery P.O. Hazaribagh (Bihar). Coal Workers' Union (AITUC) P.O. Bhurkunda. Dist. Hazaribngh.

4,200

1,200

We further agree that the decision cf the Arbitrator shall be binding on us. The Arbitrator shall make his award within a period of four months or within such further time as is extended by mutual agreement between us in writing. In

case the award is not made within the period aforementioned, the reference to arbitration shall stand automatically cancelled and we shall be free to negotiate for fresh arbitration. Witnesses: (1) Sd/- Illegible.

Signature of the Parties Representing employer

(2) (Sd.) Illegible,

(Sd-) Illegible,

Dy. Supdt. of Collleiies./Agent N.C.- D.C Bhurkunda Colliery.

(Sd.) Illegible.

8/d/iW.

Representing workers

Secretary, Coal Workers rr.k.. Bhurkunda Branch.

Enclosure

Following a strike of Mineis (Machine Cut Coal Loaders) in Bhurkunda Colliery witn effect from the first shift of 25th December, 19G7, led by Coal Worker:-, Union, Bhurkunda (A-I-T.U C.)., following Issues, arising out of the implementation of the Wage Board recommendation,¹; as accepted by the Govt. of India could not be settled by mutual discussions and they were referred to the arbitration of Sri Salim M. Merchant, Ex. Chahman, Wage Board, for the Coal Mining Industries, Bombay, by an agreement between the parties on 28th December 1967.

1. Whether Tub-pushing allowance paid to the Miners should be included as an earning for the purpose of working out the fall-back wage payable as a result of weekly review.

2. How should the days of 'lay off' and the compensation paid for those d^ys Le accounted in the weekly review for the purpose oi fall-back wages in term;, of Coal Wage Board recommendations.

'i. If a Minor stays at the working place throughout the shiit and is- not piovid- ed any work how will the day be regarded and his wages for the day regulated taking into account the provisions of lay off under the I-D. Act and the 'fall back wages' under the Wage Board Recommendations accepted by ttie Government.

Sri Salim M- Merchant communicated his acceptance to act as an Arbitrator and also sent his terms for Arbitration regarding his fee etc- Accordingly, the Coal Workers' Union was requested to share the cost of the Arbitration on 29th January 1968 to which they did not agree. The matter was further discussed between tha Management and the Coal Workers' Union and It has now been agreed by both the partiet to refer the above issues for the Arbitration of Sri O. Venkatachalam, Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) Shram Shaktl Bhawan, Rail Mnrg, New Delhi and it is presumed that he would not charge any Arbitrator's fees and the question of sharing the expenses would not arise.

Signature of the Parties Representing Employer-

(Sd.) Illegible

Dy. Superintendent of Collieries/Age.' Bhurkunda Colliery.

(Sd-) Illegible,

B/7/RT

Representing workmen:

Dated, Bth July 1969. Coal Worker's Union

INo. 2/1/68-LRII.1

Nev Delhi, the 23r,J Avguvt 1969

S.O. 3555.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Chora No. 7 and 9 Pits Colliery, Post OfTlce Chora, District Burdwan and their workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise oi the powers conferred by clause (d) of subbed ion

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Chora No. 7 and 9 Pits Colliery, Post Qfflce Chora, District Burdwan was justified in dismissing Shri Munnaka Rajbhar, Loader with effect from 14th January, 1969, and if not, to what relief he is entitled?"

[No. 6/17/6B-LRII.]

S.O. 3556.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial ^dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Messrs Shaw Wallace and Company Limited, Post Office Parasia, District Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh) and tneir workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1M7 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal, Jabalpur, constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

Whether the action of the management of Messrs Shaw Wallace and Com- pany Limited, Parasia, in dismissing the workman Shri Mahadeo ex-Hookman, Rawanwara Colliery with effect from the 20th June, 1967, is justified?

If not. to what relief the workman is entitled?

[No. 5/3/69-LRII.]

S.O. 3557,—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial •dispute exists between the employers in relation to the New Sinidih Colliery of Messrs Bamandiha! Coal Company Limited, Post Office, Kharkhar"e District .Dhanbad and their workmen In respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it dsirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, (No. 3) Dhanbad constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of New Sinidih Colliery of Messrs Bamandiha Coal Company Limited, Post Office Kharkharee, District Dhanbad, was justified In refusing work to Shri Jai Mangal Singh, Overman, with effect from the 16th June 1968? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?"

LNo. 2(56)/69-LRIL]

S.O. 355⁸.—Whereas ihe Central Government is of opinion that an industrial disput exists between the employers in relation to the management of Albion Colliery Post Office Karma- iand, District Dhanbad and their workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed ;

And wheraas the Central Government considers i: desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-scclion(i) of thc Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Acl, T947 (T-J. of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to thc Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. 3) Dhanbad constituted under section 7A of the aaid Act,

SCHEDULE

"Whetherthe management of Albion Colliery, Post Office Marmaland, Diatrict Dhanbad was justified in stopping a the 40 workmen from work whose names and designations are shown below with effect from the 1st December, 1967.

N a me

Designation SI. No.

. . . . . . . ..

Miner T. ->.

jl

. . ..

. . .

.

. ..

1}

11

3i

. . . . . ..

. . . ..

. . . ..

3- 4. 5- 6. 7. S. 9.

. . . . . . . . . ..

10.

. . . .

JJ

. . . ..

, .

II. 12.

} 3

. . ..

13. 14.

. . . . . . . ..

. .

. ..

. . . . ..

J 3

33

. . . . ..

15- 16. 17. 18. 19- 20.

21.

Kamin

. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . , . ., . . . . . . . . ..

>>

. . ..

. ..

. .

. . . . . . ..

3J

.

3 3

. . . .. . . . . . . . ..

DJ

}3

. . . . ..

.

31

.

J J 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 1O.

. ,

"

>J

. ..

. •

3>

. . .

33

Jl

. . . . . ..

?3

. ..

3i- 32- 33. 34- 3S- 36. 37- 38. 39- 40.

M ay D ab • S i t a r am D u mi D ab J o i d l ia J im R am M o n g lu • • S e wa R am • G h a Md . S o n a r am . . . . . . . .. „ P u j a ri B i s h u ha K o du R am L al R am G u ha R am A w a dh D as S h y am L al . .. R am L al . . L al D as . .. S on a D as . .. C h a m ru J an B ai . N an B at • N am B ai S a b i t ri S o na W ai • B i n da B ai • B y s a i k h in J an B ai Barindo Bai . . . . . . .. Phulwatia . . .. Bhaiti Bai Basanta Bai . • • • • • . Ram Bai . . . . . .. Tcja Eai Mikri Bai . . .. Dhani Bai • Mahatrin Meghii Bai . .. Laxmi Bai - • • Kcja Bai - • • -

If not, to what relief are they entitled ?"

[No. i(6)/69-LRII],

New Delhi, the 26th August, 1969

S.O. 3559.—Whereas the Central Government is of the opinion that an indus- trial disputes exists between the employers in relation to the Sarpi Kajora Col- liery, P.O. Ukhra, District Burdwan and their workmen in respect of the matters specified In the Schedule hereto annexed;

And, whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said

dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal Calcutta, constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the dismissal of the following workmen by the management of the Sarpi Kajora Colliery with effect from the dates shown against them was legal and Justified? If not, to what relief are the work- men entitled;~-

Name of the workmen

Date of dismissal.

1. Shrl Kharafatu Harljan, Loader, 2. Shri Munshi Bhulya, Loader

28-8-1966. 26-8-1986.

3. Shri Nagina Harijan, Loader 4. Shri Baiju Ram Kahar, S/Trammer 5. Shrl Lachman Ram Kahar, S/Trammer

26-8-1966 2.1-8-1966. 25-8-1960.

6. Shri Rama Bhuiya, S/Trammer

25-8-19GG"

[No. 6/110/60-I.R II.]

New Delhi, the 21th August 1969

S.O. 3560.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Ghatkuri Iron Ore Mines of Messrs Rungta Mines (Private) Limited and their workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And, whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7A and clause (d) of sub-sectk>n (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government heretoy constitutes an Industrial Tribunal with Shri Udayanath Mishra, with headquarters at BhubaneshwaT and refers the said dispute for adjudication to the said Industrial Tribunal.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Ghatkuri Iron Ore Mines of Messrs Rungta Mines (Private) Limited are justified in terminating the services of the following workmen with effect from 1st January, I960:—

(1) Durua Purty Munda—Mining Mate. (2) Lawrence Michiari—Mining Mate. (3) Abhiram Sinku—Mining Mate.

(4) Rangsho Hessa—Mining Mate.

(5) Ram Nath Goswamy—Mining Matf. (6) G. N. Gope—Mining Mate. (7) Rupus Samad—Blaster.

If not, to what relief are the workmen entitled?"

[No. 37/12/69-rJRIV

S.O. 3501.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Kendra Colliery of Messrs Jaipuria Samla Amalgamated Collieries Limited, Post Office Pandaveshwar, District Burdwan and their workmen in respect of the matter¹ specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of Kendra Colliery of Messrs Jaipuria Samla Amalgamated collieries Limited, Post Office Pandtjveshwar, District Burdwan was justified in dismissing Shri Nil Ratan Sarkar, Assist- ant Store Keeper from his service from 6th February 1968? If not, to what relief lie is entitled?"

[No. 6/50/G9-LRIL]

S.O. 3562.'—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Victoria West Colliery of Messrs Bengal Coal Company Limited, Post Office Dishergarh, District Burdwan and their workmen in respect of the melters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed,

And whereas the pential Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Cen- tral Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the management of "Victoria West Colliery of Messrs Bengal Coal Company Limited, Post Office Dishergarh, District Burdwan, was justified in refusing payment^ of profit sharing bonus for the years 1965 and 1E66 to Sarvashrl Daarath Pasman, Moti Nunia, Amrit Pasman and Pir Mohammed, Sirdars? If not, to what relief are these workmen entitled 1"

[No. 6/39/68-I.RII.l

S.O. 3563.—Whereas the Central Government is of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the Singarenl Collieries Com- pany Limited, Post Office Kothagudium Collieries (Andhra Pradesh) and their workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And. whereas, the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7A and clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal with Shri Mohammad Najmuddin, as Presiding Officer with headquarters at Afzal Lodge, Tilak Road, Ramkote. Hyderabad-1, and refers the said dispute for adjudi- cation to the said Industrial Tribunal

SCHEDULE

"Having regard to the recommendations of the Central Wage Board for the Coal Mining Industry prescribed for the Technical/Supervisory start of the Engineering Department under Chapter Vill, whether the management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudium. is justified in allotting Sri M. A. Hannan, Junior Charge-hand, Sand Gathering Station, Kothagudium Division in Grade 'D' of Rs. 205— 337. If not. to what re'lef the workman is entitled and from what date."

[No. 7/6/69-LRIL]

New OPVU, the 28th August 1969

S.O. 3564.—Whereas I he Central Government is of opinion that an industrial riiipute exists between the p-nployors In relation to the management of Digwadili Collierv of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited Post Office Jealgora, District Dhanbad and then- workmen in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;

And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the said dispute ior adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central Govern- ment Industrial Tribunal, (3) Dhanbad, constituted under section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

"Whether the action of the management of Digwadih Colliery of Messrs Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, in suspending Shri Budhar Mistry, Mechanical Fitter with effect from the 8th July, 1968 vide manage- ment's letter No. Dig/15D-68/3602 dated 25-6/1-7-1068 is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman entitled?

[No. 2/232/68-LRII.]

P C. MISRA, Under Secy.

(Department of Labour and Employment)

ORDER

New Delhi, the 25th August 1069

8.0. 3565,—Whereas an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of Calcutta Licensed Measurers and their workmen represented by the Calcutta Port and Dock Workers Union and the National Union of Waterfront Workers,

And, whereas the said employers and their workmen, by a written agreement under Sub-section (1) of Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), agreed to refer the said dispute to arbitration and have forwarded to the Central Government, under Sub-Section (3) of Section 10A of the said Act, a copy of the said arbitration agreement;

Now, therefore, in pursuance oi Sub-Section (3) of Section 10A of the said Act, the Central Government hereby publishes the said arbitration agreement which was received by it, on the 2Sth July, I960.

Agreement under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 1947.

BETWEEN

Name of the Parties

Representing Workmen

Representing Employers :— Calcutta Licensed Measurers. (1) Calcutta Port and Dock Workers'

Union,

(2) National Union of Waterfront

Workers.

(1) Mr. K. K. Mitra, Secretary, Cal- Representing Employers

cutta Licensed Measurers.

(2) Mr. M. Ghose, Labour Adviser, Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Representing Workmen

(1) Mr. D.K. Ganguly, Joint Secretary, Calcutta Port and Dock Workers' Union.

(2) Mr. Janakl Mukherjee, Joint Gene- ral Secretary, National Union of Waterfront Workers.

It is hereby agreed between the parties to refer the following dispute to the- arbitration of Sri B. N- Banerjee, (Retd. Judge, Calcutta High Court), Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta, 20, British Indian Street, Calcutta :~~

(1) Whether the demands for the revision with effect from 1st October, 196H¹ of the existing :—

(i) Scale of wages. (ii) Dearness Allowances

(iii) Rates for extra-shift bookings, Sunday/Holiday bookings, and work- beyond scheduled hours ot work,

(iv) House Rent Allowance, (v) City Compensatory Allowance, and (vi) Khoraki Allowance,

of the Measuring Porters and Gearmen are justified?

If so, what should be the revised scale of wages and other allowances mentioned above?

(2) (i) Details of the parties to the dispute including the name and address of the establishment or undertaking involved ;—

Measuring Porters and Gearmen of the Calcutta Licensed Measurers, P-78, Garden Reach Road, Calcutta-43.

(ii) Name of the workmen In case he himself is involved In the dispute or the name of the Union, if any, representing the workman or workmen in. question :—

Name of Unions (a) Calcutta Port and Dock Workers' Union 27/B, Circular Garden Reach Road, Calcutta-23-

(b) National Union of Waterfront Workers, 10, Mohan Chand Road, Calcutta-23.

(iii) Total number of 640 workmen employed in the undertaking affected.

(lv) Estimated number of workmen aiYected or likely to be affected by the diKpute=375.

The Arbitrator (s) shall make his award within a period (here specify the period affreed upon by the parties), or within such further time as is extended by mutual agreement between us in writing. In case the award is not made within the period aforementioned, the reference to arbitration shall stand automatically cancelled and we shall be free to negotiate for fresh arbitration

Signature of the Parties :•—

Representating Employees

1. (Sd./-) D. K. GANGULY.

Representative of Employers 1. (Sd./-) K. K. MITBA. 2.

2 (Sd./-) .1. MtrKHiHjiW.

Witnesses :— 1. 2.

[No. 28/3/69-LWI-III.l C. RAMDAS, Dy. Secy.

(Department of Rehabilitation)

(Office of the Regioaal Settlement Commissioner, Rajasthan, Fateh Tiba)

ORDERS

Jaipur, the 23rd August 1969

S.O. 3566.—In exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 34 of the (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, I hereby delegate my powers of determining under Section 7(3)/ibid the net compensation payable to the claimants to Shrl N. B. Gorwaney, Settlement Officer and also authorise him under Rule 15 of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 to prepare summaries in Appendix VII and to sign the payment orders thereon with effect from 1st May, 1969.

[No. RSCR/ASO(Admn) /1 (32) /Policy/ 13378.J

S.O. 3567.—In exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 34 of the (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1054, I hereby delegate my powers of determining under Section 7 (3) /ibid the net compensation payable to the claimants to Shri U. S. Srivastava, Asstt. Settlement Officer and also authorise him under Rule 15 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 to prepare summaries in Appendix VII and sign the payment orders thereon with eftect from 1st May, 196B.

[No. RSCR/AO(Admn)/l(32)/67/Policy/13390.J

RATTAN SINGH. Asstt. Settlement Commissioner

I / C, M.P. & Rajasthan, Jaipur

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

S E C

.

(Department of Economic Affairs)

3

O

New Delhi the 21th August 1969

i l ]

S.O 3568.—Statement of the Affairs of the Reserve Bank of India, as on the 22nd August [569.

BANTONG DEPARTMENT

T H E

,

ASSETS

LIABILITIES

G A Z E T T E

Rs.

O F

I

5 . 0 0 , 0 0 . 0 00 N o t es . . . . ..

40,59,11 yx> Capital paid-up

N D

I

A

2 47,0O0

I5o,oc*x<,ooo Rupee Coin

:

Reserve Fund . . , . . , ..

i m a ll Coin . . . . ..

4,88^)00

National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations)

S E P T E

155,00 00,000 Bills Purchased and Discounted i—

Fund

M B E R

35,00,00^100 (a) Internal • • • > *

N"tJonal Agricultural Credit (Stabilisation) Fund

6

,

(b) Hrtexnal . . .

1 9 6 9

/

75,oo,oOjOOC (c) Go^ernmem Treasury Bills

National Industrial Credit (Long-Term Operations) Fund

Balances Held Abroad"

174,01,68/xx)

B H A D R A

I n v c i i r a t n U ** . . .. >

146,94 ozfiao

1 5

,

L~i>atis d nj aovances to :--

Deposits;—

1 8 9 1

\.i) Ceuira^Gitvcriiater.'

(j) Government

5 1 , 0 2 , 1 6, 00 (U) Stare G i w t r a mr s

(I) Centiti Govemmen:

4239J95/³⁰⁰

LIABILITIES

ASSETS

3 7 7 2 (a) Stwe liovcriinu nis

10,22^27.000

Loan a and Advances to *—

(*) Buiki

(1) Scheduled Commercial ItankjT

71,04,95." >°u

327,66,80^00

(&•) Siitt Go-opewri" Bankitt

T H E

1,80,08.000

CO Scheduled CommerciaJ Hauls

(II'O Others

(.it) Scheduled State Co-operative Bai ti

11,09,24,000

Lomis, Acfrwices and Investments from Nationi) Agri

cnlt oral Credit CLong Term Opermtlons) Fund—

( w) Non-Scheduled State Co-operative ftank-

57,50,000

(a) Loans and Advances to :—

G A Z E T T E ((tr) Other Banks

CO State Governments

29,94>O("

O F

16.20,23.000

(a) State Go-operative Banks .

(e) Other* . .. ,

232,00,33^00

I

(iii) Central Land Mortgage Banks

N D Bilh Payable

(6) Investment in Central Land Mortgage Bant

I

28,97>77'°O0

A

Debentures

8,96^3,000

:

Other Liabilid'i . .

Loans & Advances from National Agricultural Credit

29,89,74.°°°

(Stabilisation) Fund —

Loans and Advances to State Co-operative Barks

5,58,50,000

Loans, Advances and Investments from National Indus trial

Credit (Long Term Operations! Fund—

6,26,71*000

S E P T E M B E R

(a) Loans and Advances to the Development Bank

6

(b) Investment in bonds/debentures issued by the

,

Development Bank ,

Other Assets

Ba.oS^cwo

1 9 6 9

/

knpees . . . . ..

Rupees

981,45,08,000

98 [,45,08,000

•Includes Cash, Fixed Deposits and Short-term Securities.

B H A D R A

•• EscJading Investments from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund and the National Industrial Credit (Long Term

1 5

, Operatiofis) Fund.

rgExcluding Loans and Advances from the National Agriculrurai Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund, battrjdoding temporary overdrafts to State

Governments.

1 8 9 1

[ flndudesRs. zsfio/xhooo advanced to scheduled commercial bank* against usance bills uader Section iX4X<0 of the Reserve Bank of India Act.

•ftEJtcladingLoansand Advance^ from the Narircil ^gricalruralCirdit (Long Term Operations) Fund -n;d the National Agricultn at Credit (Stabili-

P A R T sation) Fund.

Dated ^e 27th day if August 1969

I I -

An Account pmnout to to* Retcrrt Bank of l u te Act, 1934 for the week enacj the 22nd day of August 1969.

ISSOE DEPABTMEVT

S a ^ 3

( i l ) ]

LIABILITIES

ASSETS

R s.

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

Geld Coin and Bullion : —

Ni'ish ic in the Banking DepartDifBi

40,59,1 i / "a

182,53,11^100

(a) Held in Ind^a (6) Held outside India

foreign Securities .

200,88,70)000

3498,33,11,000

TOTAL

Motes in circjjatktfi

T H E G A Z E T T E O P

I

Rupee Coin

. . ..

383,41,81,000

72,74,70,000

N D

I

Government of India Rupee Securities

T o t al N o t es i s s u ed . . ..

3082,75,71^00

3538,92>22Jcoo

A

:

Internal Bill' of Exchange and

other Commercial P j p sr

S E P T E

3538,92,22,000

Total Assets

T o t al L a b i l i t i es

3538,92^2,000

M B E R

6

,

L. K. JHA, Governor- Dated the 27th day of August 1969.

1 9 6 9

/

[No. F. 3(3)-BC/69]

B H A D R A

l

^

l

W

l

'

3 7 7 3

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 26th August 1969

S.O. 3569.—Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that nothing further remains to be done in order to wind up the affairs of the Champakulam Catholic Bank Ltd.;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (11) of section 38 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959), the Central Government hereby directs that on and from the 1st day of Septem- ber, 1969, the said Champakulam Catholic Bank Ltd. shall stand dissolved.

[No. F. 4/13/69-SB-]

S.O. 3570.—Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that nothing further remains to be done in order to wind up the affairs of the Bank of Alwaye Ltd.;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (11) of section 38 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (38 of 1959), the Central Government hereby directs that on and from the 1st day of Septem- ber, 1969, the said Bank of Alwaye Ltd. shall stand dissolved.

[No. F. 4/J4/67-SB.]

K, YESURATNAM, Under Secy,

(Department of Revenue and Insurance)

New Delhi the 19th August 1969

8.O. 3513.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 101-B of the Insurance Act, 193a (4 of 1938), and In supersession of the notifica- tion of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, (Department of Economic Affairs) No. S.O. 1092, dated the 10th May, 1961, the Central Govern- ment hereby constitutes an Advisory Committee for the purposes of section 101-A of the said Act, consisting of the following persons, namely:—•

1. Shrl C. S. Anantapadmanabhan, Director (Insurance), Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and Insurance, New Delhi.

2. Shri R. M. Desai, General Manager. India Reinsurance Corporation Ltd., Industrial Assurance Building, Churchgate, Bombay 20 (BR).

3. Shri G. V. Jannah, General Manager, Indian Guarantee and General Insurance Company Ltd., Gresham Assurance House, Sir P. M. Road, Bombay.

4. Shri H. D. R. Edwards, Royal Exchange Assurance, P.O. Box No. 357, 6, Lyons Range, Calcutta-1.

5. Shri C. M. Telivala, Indian Mercantile Insurance Co. Ltd. Indian Mercan- tile Chambers, Nicol Road, Ballard Estate, Bombay-1.

2. Shri C. S. Anantapadmanabhan shall be the Chairman of the Advisory Committee

[No. F.51(18)-INS.I/69L]

S.O. 3574.—In exercise of the powers conferred by rule 36 of the Insurance Rules, 1939 and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, (Department of Economic Affairs) No. S.O. 1093 dated the 10th May, 1961, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri S- R. Kumrai, Assistant Controller of Insurance, Simla to act as Secretary of the Advisory Com- mittee constituted under the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance of even number and date.

[No. F.51(18)-INS.I/69-II.]

RAJ K. NIGAM, Dy. Secy.

CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE, DELHI

New Delhi, the 14th August 1969

S.O. 3577.—In partial modification of the Notification issued under this office C No, V(a) 15/9/Int/6e dated 1st November, 1968, it is notified that the growers cultivating tobacco in plots measuring 12 ares or less In area shall be exempted from the requirements of the provisions of Rule 15 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and curers curing a quantity of unmanufactured tobacco not exceeding 60 (sixty) kgs. shall not be required to declare the cured produce under provisions of Rule 16 ibid. The exemptions under Rule 15 and 16 are thus independent of each other and shall be read accordingly.

[C No- V(a)15/9/Int/68-]

C. L. NANGIA,

Deputy Collector. Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi.

THE MADRAS CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE : MADRAS-

3 7 7 8

Madras the 18th August 1969

I

H E S.O.3578 —In supersession of the notification issued in this office C. No. IV/16/122/67-CE. Pol dated 25-10-60 and in exercise of the powe-rs conferred on me under the second provisos to Rules 15 and 16 of the Central Excise Rules 1944 as amended by the Government of Ir"dia Ministry of Finance Notification No. 123/68 dated 25-5-68 I hereby declare the tobacco growing areas specified in column 4 of the appended statement as sparse growing areas. The extent ot tobacco cultivation within these specified sparse growing areas upto which individual growers need not furnish their declarations under Rule 15 of Central Excise Rules 1944 is indicated in Column 5 and the limit upto which individual airexs in these specified sparse areas need not furnish their declarations under rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules j 1944 is indicated in colimn 6 of the statement appended.

G A Z E T T E

Statement showing the sparse Tobacco grov.-mg area in the Madras Central Excise (Electorate.

O F

I

Remarks / Revenue jurisdiction of The Range/Circle/

N D

I Name of the Division Range

SL No.

Division

Area in terms of revenue rurisdiction to be declared as sparse growing areas

A

:

S E P T E

M B E R

6

,

1 9 6 9

/

Limits upto which individual curersin the areas in Column 4 need not declare their pro- duce as per the Second provisos to Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 1944

B H A D R A

Extent of tobacco cultivation in the areas speci- fied in Column 4 upto which individual growers need not declare the cultivation as per second proviso to Rule 15 of Central Excise Rules 1944

1 5

,

1

2

6

7

4

5

3

1 8 9 1

[

P

I 1

The whole of North Arcot District

Madras Division II.

(Villages in Chengam Range)

30 Kg.

X T

5 ares

I I

1. Whole of Pudupalayam Hrka. Com- prising of the following 26 villages.

—

(t) f^h^ngam Range (whole of f^^ng^m revenue Taluk excluding Thanipaid and Tandrambut revenue firka).

                                                                              S
  1.  Nayampadi                                                               E
  2.  Endal                                                                   C .
  3.  Mashan                                                                  3
                                                                              (
  4-  Kallarpadi                                                              i
                                                                              i
  5.  Kanji                                                                   )
                                                                              |
                                                                              T
  7.  Pudnpalhu                                                               H
  8.  Korathanpattu                                                           E
  9.  C.  Gangampet                                                           G
 10.  Kilpudur                                                                A
                                                                              Z
 11.  Voividanthangal                                                         E
 12.  Melpadur                                                                T
 13.  Padiagragarain                                                          T
                                                                              E
 14.  Alliandal
 15.  Nandimangalam                                                           O
                                                                              F
 16.  PaDaiolnppadi                                                           I
 17.  Alathur                                                                 N
 18.  Japtiukanyanda]                                                         D
                                                                              I
 19.  Oravandaravadi                                                          A :
 20.  Dhamarapakkam                                                           S
 21.  Kakarasanpalayaxn                                                       E
                                                                              P
 22.  Pudupalayam                                                             T
 23-  XJonamalaipalayarD                                                      E
 24.  Periavi                                                                 M
 25.  KarapeL                                                                 B
                                                                              E
 26.  Veeranaxidal.                                                           R
                                                                              6
                                                                              ,
Whole of Eraiyur Fiika comprising of 34                                       1
  villages.                                                                   9
                                                                              6
                                                                              9
  1.  Mamalai                                                                 /
                                                                              B
  2.  Se.  N a d i i p et
                                                                              H
  3. T h a t h a p e t t ai                                                   A
  4.  P o r a s a p a t hi . . .   ..      5 ares     30 Kgs.                 D
  5. Arathonaiii                                                              R
                                                                              A
  6.  T a l a y u t hu
                                                                              1
  7.  Ariyakumgu                                                              5
                                                                              ,
  8.  Panjyur                                                                 1
  O.  TCariamqngaiprr                                                         8
                                                                              9
 10.  Melpannatiiur                                                           1
 11.  Sorpanandal
 12,  Vehinalaiiaippam
 13-  Se. Agaram                                                              3
 14. Aswanagasuvanai                                                          7
                                                                              9
                                                                              7

I 2

6

3

4

5

3 7 8 0

T H E

G A Z E T T E

O F

I

N D

I

A

:

S E P T E

16. M-Nachipet Tl. SpnHnmnngabvm 18. Kothakulam 19. vasuacranpsffu 20. Melaponjai 21. Annan rial 22. Mutbanoc •J.3. M^m^Hanttr 24. Vi&navamur 25. Padad 26. Nalliir 27- Thocappadi •yS. >l!rpfsinganHnnr 29. Gulalradi 30. Kathavadi 31. Kolapadi 32. Enriyur 33. Beecoandal ^4_ KBTrmntnnTnit

M B E R

Whole of HUe villages numbering 14.

6

12 ares

6oKgs.

,

1 9 6 9

/

T. Palpanffimpfflthrtr 2. Puliynr 3. Melthattiapatti 4. KilthalhapaOi 5. Nellinoy 6. Emfckampatti 7. AtMpat

8* rt*rj 1 m r f nM I II

9. Kilapsttu

B H A D R A

1 5

,

10* Otiinnalnlpat^a

11. Melprftn

It VnnfipfTtgnttflri

13. Palamarathnr

14. MdsQambadi.

1 8 9 1

[

Whole <£ area as indicated in Column 3(Le.)

GoKgs.

12 ares

the whole of Ami Range.

P A R T

I I Ami Range comprising of Ami Taluk. Cbyyar Talnk, Wandiwash Taluk, Polar Taluk and Tirumi and Kakvai Rika of Wallajah Tahik and Tirunjapnram Firka of Tiruvannamafeu Taluk.

—

I2"ares 6oKgs.

& E C

.

3 Tandrampet Range comprising of Tandram- but and Thanipadi Ptrkas of Chen gam Taluk.

( i i ) ]

EntirelTanipadi Firka of Qiengam Taluk except the villages, Mothakkal, Chirmigrm- pet, Thanipadij Andapetj Bondai, Royan- dapuram, Thandanur Okgalpadi, Perun- g^lathTir VaghanachanUT, Malafmirmytnur. Vepoor and vdur.

n

12 a^' 6oKgs.

1. Tiruvannamalai Tirka except, Tiruvan-

Tir>'yn""m!ilai fcangp fwfinlp nf Timvan-

i l i

pamaki Town

nnmalai Revenue Taluk except Ttturinja- puram Firka.

2. Vavaiyur Firka except Andampallam a n d| A^durainpet villages * ^ 3. Kflpennathur Firka except Valuthalan-

gunam village.

G A Z E T T E

'0 Kgs.

Gudiyatham MOR (The whole of Gudiya- Perrvcorm vLUsge and its hamlet. 12 aic

O F

I tham Taluk and a part of Vellore Tahik in Puthureripf J'i vilbge of and its hamTets North Arcot Dist. GudiyathamEastFirka ofgudryathamTaluk.

N D

I

12 ares 67 Kgs.

A

:

the Who'e of Veeregunur Pirka except the fm viUtge of Odayathur in Veeraganur

Firka in Sallm Uistrict.

2 Salem Division Thammampatty MOR

. Whole of revenue taluk of Attur exrrod ng whole of Thalarvasal Pethanaiyaktmparsy Ethapur Firkas and Portion of Atttr Firka

S E P T E

12 arcs 60 Kgs.

Portion of Namakkal Taluk

Nanrakkal

NErnakkal-PucuchaiitrD. Sendannacgakm, Erummaipatti Fjrkas in Salem District.

M B E R

6

,

12 ares 60 Kgs.

. Rasipuim Tatuk in Salem Division.

Rasipuram

1 9 6 9

/

Margalspurein Firka, Nanagjripet Firka of Rasipura Ta!uk, and Rasiparam Firka except GunssmipalayEm and K. Komara- palayam h/o Pillajaallur village and KOIB- likupuram and Ponknruchi viEsges of Rasapuram Firkas in Salem District where tobacco is grown in commercial basis.

B H A D R A

1 5

,

DharmapuriTahik in Dhannapari District. 12 areesT

60 Kgs.

. Whole of Dharampuri Taluk

Dharmapuri

MohanEijParamathiKatilarmalai Fjikas

Mohanur Paramathi; Kabilannalai Fiikas

60 Kgs.

Velnr

12 arees

1 8 9 1

of Namakkal Taluk.

in Salam District

10 arees

. Krishnagiri Tahik except Santhur and

Krishnagiri

50 Kgs.

Mafur Firkas.

Krishanafeiri Taluk except Efenthur and MarmFSritas in Dharmapuri District.

3 7 8 1

3 7 8 2 3

1 I 2

4

5

6

I

B B

Uthangarai

12 ares 6o Kgs.

The who]e ofUthangarai Sub. Taluk con- sisting of 4 Firkas, viz. Uthangarai. Kal- lavi, Mathur and Santhur.

The whole of Uthangarai Snb Taluk con- sistirgof4 revenue firkasviz. Uthangarai, Kallavi, Mathur and Santhur in the Dhannapuri District.

G A Z E T T E

Entire Harnr Tahik in Dharmapuri District

io ares

Hanir

Entire Harur Taktk |

6o Kgs.

io ares 50 Kgs.

Hosur Taluk and Denkanikottai Taluk of Hosnr and Denkanikittai Taluk of Dhaima-

Hosur

O F

I Dhannapnri District.

puri Distt.

N D

Tirnchengodu

I

12 ares 60 Kgs.

A

:

Thirucliengcdu Ellachipalajfm Senkan I>urg. Thevoor Fiikas in the Trinchen- godu Taluk.

Molasai, Kocthanpccrdi. A5usiri Kolsn- dondai, Marur and Aravasipatti villages of TiruchengQdn Taluk in Salem District.

Pallipalayam Revenue Firka in Timcten-

12 arcs

Koma rap ala y am

60 Kgs.

godu Taluk of Salem District.

S E P T E

M B E R

6

ElandakotiEi. KcniarEFEls;,rm Thathan- kuttai, Kodachanalhir, Sarcayasargili. Pallakkapalayam, Kaliyanoor, PaDipabyarn Padaveedu, Sowdapnram, Kokkar- deynpettai, Pappampakyam, Pudupala- yamj Odapalii vilkges of Thimchengodu Taluk in Salem District.

,

1

Idapaddi

40 Kgs.

Omalur Taluk, Kadayampatti Firka.

12 ares

%

9

/

I

Five villages in Kadayampattti Firka ofSatem District viz. Ketimmarikar patti, Ptkiur, KamaVaopucIur. Vippilai. Sikkarapatti nnH Pelapatti, Kombai.

1

Attur

60 Kgs.

12 ares

J

KaJpaganoor, Kathambadi and Ramana- ickanpalayam Firka of Attur Tahik.

B H A D R A

1 5 Part of Atmr Firka (i.e.) Seelaimpatti, Mallikkarai Chokanathapnrem. Than- davaiajapurani. Naxasingapurftn- Attnr, AppammasamiEKlraiQ Thutakanur, KjilianafhsirP villagps

,

12 ares

1 8 9 1

1 1 I Whole of Thalaivasal Fiika and part of pethanayakampalayam Firka (ie) Kalpa- ganur, Kothambadi and Ramankkan- palaam.

f f

w n

-

Malaikarai Chokanathapursm, Thandavara- yapuramJNarasirgapuram. Attur. Amma- palayam, Appamasundramj Thuftfonur, MaTfhrorl nnd Kpplnn^tbajr" vi]|sg" of Attur Firka of Attur Taluk Salem District. Whole of ThaJaivasal Firka except Sim- vachur and Varagur \Tlla^s in Salem District.

Revenue Fitkas of Panruti, Kadambubyoor ]

Pondi cherry Division

I2sre& 60 Kg>.

S E C

.

3 Panmii

- and Kurunjipadiand 4 villages in Ne- Uikupam Fitka of Cuddalore Taluk South Arcot District.

( i i ) ]

K.Namarknppam, Mettukuppam, (Portioit of the village coming under the revenue firka of Kunftigipadi) Karunguzhi, Aba- tnanapuram. Paratfaipurani, Vadthalfm- patti chatrani village located in Knricjipadi Firka of Coddalore Taluk of South Arcot district.

T H E Pondkherry

As in column 3.

I2ares 60 Kgs.

Cuddalote

Cuddalere O.T. Manjakuppam Kullancha- "1 vadiNellilnippain Firkas exceptEmniedu, j PaUanarayanathain, Palur, and Sanniyasi- ; pettai villages of Cuddalore Taluk South [ | Arcot District.

G A Z E T T E

60 Kgs.

J2ares

Tindivanam Taluk in South Arcot District.

Pondicherry * £ f* Tindivartam Taluk

O F

I

60 Kgs.

Tindivanam Pondkherry

All the fiikfi in Villipunm frrd Girgee 12 ares Vflhrpur^m Taluk consisting of VMipurein.

N D

I

Tahik • of South Aicoi District.

A

:

Villupuram

Kamaikanjnoor, Vikarandi; Valavanoor, Kandamangalam Firkas SD<1 Gingee, Senthamangalam. Melmalaiyanoor, Sat- hanpadi, Melobkkur Firkas,

S E P T E

12 ares Pondicherry

(0 Kgs.

Tirukoilur

Five Firkas of Tirukollur Taluk viz.^Tiru- AmthangxidiEdayurjKoEapparaJNarifnc'a], koilur, Manalurpet, Elavanasurkottai Timpalapandal. PocDaieBdal Fcomeiynr, Mugaiyur and Thuruvannainallur. Solarandapuram, Thagadi Tirnkoilur @

M B E R

6

,

1 9 6 9

/

Thyanoor Verapaixly of TJrnkoihir Firka, South Arcot Dist. Sorayapattu. Mana- lurpet FiTka South Arcot Dist. Ang^noor, Katmedayur, Kunjaiam, Pinnalvadi, MelputtamaiigaJsrB. Veda- knrumboor Perindal, Poomala^anocr of Elavanasurkottai Firka South Arcot Distiia.

B H A D R A Pondicherry

i: ares fo Kgs.

1 5

, Ulundurpet

Utundnrpet in South Arcot of Rishyavandi- yatn Firka Thyagadurgam Firka, Ulun- durpet Firka, Tirunavalur Fiika.

1 8 9 1

Villages of Macdagapadi Ituthiyfm Kil- padi, Rishyvandijam VadathorafahiT. Sathapnthur, Melapalangoor, Nooroolai, Sipalapattu. Royapnram-Pasal. Munirazlii;, Magyaaujal and Sagndaloor of Rishyavan- diyam Firka of Kallakumchi Taluk Sonth Arcot District.ThyagadUrgam^inniyurj Kottayur. MalavarayanDr, Gnrupuda- puram, Koonthalur, Thyagai, Vengai-

3 7 8 3

3

7

6

H I 2

5

2

4

3

T H E

G A Z E T T E

O F

I

N D

I

vadee* KudiyanaDur. Eyyantir 0. Ogainyur, ChinnammapattDj Anthyur, Kunniyur, Sitiialar, Pana^'arigal. Vdakkuruchi. Vrrugavoor in Tbyagaoiirgam Firka of Kaflakuruchi Taluk South Arcot District. Asanur, Edaikkal, Veflayur, Koraluradi, Kiliyur, Pooranoor. Malayadi. Kunna- thoor villages in Ulundurpet Firka of Tirnkoihir Tahik South Arcot District Cnianakoppam and Ifluppaur in Tiru- navalur Fuka of TirukoOur Taluk South Arcot District. t

A

:

4oKgs.3

! 4ares

Pondkherry

The whole of Kaliakuruclii Tahik except J Thyagaiurgam and Rishivandyatn Firkss in South Arcot District.

T ie whole of Kaflakuruchi Tatak except Tbagadurgam and RisJuVsndyTam Firkas ia South Arcot District.

Kallakuruchi

S E P T E

6oKgs.

12 ares

Erode Division

M B E R

Penwdurai

6

, In Coimbatore District Erode Taluk 3 reve- TITW Firts vi? fTSennTmalfif. TTthtitnii anrf Perundorai and the villages of Attavanai, Ammampalli and Arachalur of Sivagiri Firka and the vili^es of Aralpoondurai, Titooyanj Perandmai and Kamaksporain of Modakuri. Firka.

/

The entire revenue jurisdiction of Perundurai Firka. The villages of Thooyampundurai and Komakapiiram of Modkurichi Firka. The village Mukeri Ammampalli of Siv^iri Fixka and the ten villages viz., Sundakkam- pslqys^m TTor^mrfipalayam- Miithflmpalaysm. VmmipTirlamrttlayamj "NavqVkadu. Kflrn- manchirai, Pacharupalayam, Kunnathnr; Fitrifhi and Agrabara K at h a t i t n m" •* UthukuK Firka of Erode Taluk in Coim- batore Dist.

1 9 6 9 B H A D R A

6oKgs.

I2%res

Denad village, Kotagiri Firka of Coonoor

The Nilgiri Dist Pollachi Udumalpet and

Coimbatore Division

1 5

Taluk, Nilgiri District.

,

Coonoor

Coimbafore Talaks and Metturalaj^m Fitka of Avanashi Taluk in CoirnbatOTe Dist.

1 8 9 1

[

S ares

As ia Column 3.

Trichy Division

P A S T M.O.R. 'A'

I I The following ares in Tiruchirappalti, Chin- thamaai.. Teppaknlam; Palakkarai Beema- nagar, and a part of Cantonment and Lalgmdy Puliambadi Perunvallappur Firkas trf Lalgudy Taluk Tiracfairappali District.

—

M.O.R. 'B'

Same as in column 3. 5 ares 4oKgs.

S u e

.

3 Places in Trichy Town not covered by the M f lR 'A' B^nge Tirnrti'j Mnn!"+iflriail"r ValaHn j "Kariamanirtnm "Fij-kw: rvfT jilgiwly Taluk and Srirangam Andarallur, Tiruva- vambur Firkas of Tiruchi District.

( i i ) ]

Pulukottai

Alangudi, Kolathur and Tirumanyam Taluk Same asin col. 3. 5 ares 4oKgs.

of Tinichirappalli DisL

T H E

Karur Range

4oKgs.

Karur, Vellianai and Pugalur Firkas of Karur 5 ares Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

Karur Vellianai Pugalur and Paramathi Firkas of Karur Tahik Tiruchirappalli District,

4°Kgs.

5 ares

Kulithalai

Same as in column 3.

Whole of Kulithalai Taluk Tiruchirappalli

District,

Elangakuruchi

Same as in column 3.

S ares 40 Kgs.

Whole of Manappara Taluk Tiruchirappalli

G A Z E T T E O F District.

I

5 ares

Ttruraivur

Whole of Musiri and Perambaror Taluks of Same as in column 3.

4°Kgs.

N D Tiruchirappalli District.

I

A

Same as in column 3.

5 ares

:

40 Kgs.

Ariyalur

Ariyalur and Jayamkondam Tamks of Tim-

Nil

Nil

Axavakuruchi

Nil

f^iinn^iHhafapTirflTin nruj\ ATayflVllplr+ii "FITW* of Karur Taluk Tiruchirappalli District.

S E P T E

Same as in cohimn 3,

4O.Kgs.

Tanjore Range

Tanjore, Orathanad, Pattukottai and Aian-

5ares

thangi Taluks of Tanjore District.

NQ

Nil

Nil

Vedaranyam Range

M B E R 6

,

1 9 6 9

/ Whole of Vedaranyam Fiikas and six villages viz., Vellapallam NabnvedhapattV) Kalli- nv^n3 Tivqnqitiiliim Avsrrilrarlii and Koilpatru of Talainayar Firka and 3 vill^es viz.3 Thillaivalagam, Idumbavanam and Karpaganathikulsni of Klachikulam Firka of Tiruthuraipoondi Taluk Tanjore District

B H A D R A

40 Kgs.

A.S in column 3.

5a"s

Tiruvarur

1 J

, Nagapattinam and Mannargndi and rest of Tiruthurai Poondi Taluk not covered by Vedaranyam Range.

l t

"

5 ares 40 Kgs.

l Mayuram Range Mayuram, Sirkali and Vannilam Taluks and PandaraT'ir Piffc? "f KTTtnhaknnam Tahit.

Mayuram and Nannilam Taluks Paxtdanalur Firka of Kumbakonam Taluk and Sirkali Taluk except Madanam and Sirkali Firkas of Sirkali Tamk, Tanjavoor District.

3 ? 8 5

3 7 8 6 I 2

6

4

3

7

5

Kumbakonam

Same as in Column 3.

5 ares 40 Kg.

T H E Papanasam Taluk and Kumbakonam Taluk except Pandanallur Fira of Kumbakonam Taluk.

Madurai Division Tiruvandanai Taluk of Ramanathapuram The whole of Tiruvandanai Taluk of Rama- 2 ares 27 Kg.

District.

nathapuram District.

G A Z E T T E

Sivaganga Taluk and Manamadurai sub-

Tiruvadanai Range Sivaganga Range

2 ares 27 Kg.

O F Taluk of Paramakudi Taluk of Ramanatha- puram District.

The whole of Sivaganga Taluk and Manama- durai Sub-Taluk of Paramakudi Taluk of Ramanathapuram District.

I t f

D Natham and Kottampatty Firka of Melur

Karaikudi Range .

The whole of Tirupathur Taluk of Ramana- 2 ares 27 Kg.

I

A

thapuram District.

Taluk Madurai District.

:

2. Tiruppatur Taluk of Ramanathapuram

District.

Paramakudy Range

27 Kg.

2 ares

S E P T E Ramanathapuram Taluk and Paramakudi Taluk excluding Manamadurai sub-Taluk.

The whole of Natham and Kottampatty firka of Mellur Taluk of Madurai District. The whole of Paramakudi Taluk of Ramana- nathapuram except Manamadurai sub- taluk.

The whole of Ramanathapuram Taluk of

M B E R

Ramanathapuram District.

6

,

The whole of Tirumangalam Taluk of Madu-

Tirumangalam Taluk including Usilampatti

27 Kg.

2 ares MOR I Madurai .

rai District.

Taluk (newly formed Taluks of old Tirumangalam of Madurai District.

1 9 6 9

/

The whole of Usilampatty Taluk of Old Tirumangalam Taluk of Madurai District.

60 Kg.

12 ares Sivakasi Division .

B H A D R A

The whole of Kanyakumari District and Tirunelveli District and Srivilliputhur and Sattur taluks of Ramanathapuram Taluk.

1 5 Whole of Kanyakumari District and Tirunel- veli District and Sattur and Srivilliputhur Taluks of Ramanathapuram District and Soolakarai village and Ayyanar Spinning Mills at Mallankinar of Aruppukottai Talul

k.

,

1 8 9 1

[C No. V/4/3O/48/68-CX. III.]

[

S. VENKATARAMAN,

P A R T

Collector of Central Excise,

Madras-34-

I I -

MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, INTERNAL TRADE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS

(Department of Industrial Development)

ORDERS

New Delhi, the 1th August 1969

S.O. 3579.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 18A of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951), the Central Government hereby makes the, following amendments In the order of the Government of India In the late Ministry of Industrial Development and Company Affairs (Department of Industrial Development) No. S.O. 3091/18A/, IDRA/67, dated the 2nd September, 1967, namely:

Ira clause 2 of the said Order, sub-clause (v) shall be omitted.

[No. 9(l)Uc.Pol./67.]

New Delhi, the 26th. August 1969

S.O. 3680.—D3RA/6/3/69.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 6 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1961), read with rules 5(1) and 8 of the Development Councils (Procedural) Rules, 1952, the Central Government hereby appoints Shri V. H. Dalmia, President, Indian Sugar Mills Association, to be a member, till the 30th April, 1971, of the Development Council Established by the Order of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Industrial Development, Internal Trade and Company Affairs No, S.O. 176/IDRA/ 6/3/69, dated the 1st May, 1969 for the Scheduled industries engaged in the manufacture or production of sugar and directs that the following amendment shall be made in the said Order, namely:—

In the said Order, for entry No. 3 relating to Shri D. C. Kothari, the following entry shall be substituted, namely:

"3. Shri V. H. Dalmia, President, Indian Sugar Mills Association, 4, Sctndia House, New Delhi."

[No. 13(8)/68-L.C]

R. C. SETHI, Under Secy.

(Department of Industrial Development)

(Indian Standards Institution)

New Delhi, the 11th August 1969

S.O, 3581.—In partial modification of the notification published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3 (ii) dated 19th April, 1969 under number S-O. 1455 dated 3rd April, 1969, it is hereby notified that the Note with an asterisk pertaining to IS:103U-1957, referred to In Col. 3 of SI. No. 6 of the schedule thereof, shall be amended to read as follows :

'For the purpose of ISI Certification Marks Scheme IS:1038->193T'shiM fiso run concurrently with IS:1038-1968 up to 30th November, tOfiVl

[No. GM©yWS;2-]

New Delhi, the 18th August 1969

S.O. 3583.—In pursuance of sub-regulation (1) of Regulation 5 of the Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Regulations, 1955, as amended from time to time, and consequent upon publication of IS : 446-1968 Specification for air hose of rubber with woven textilcjrcinforcement {second revuion), it is, hereby, notified that IS •- 3557-1965 Specification for air hose of rubber, heavy duty, with woven reinforcement details of which were published under notification number S. O. 2687 dated 26 August 1966, in the Gazette of India Part II, Section 3 —sub-section (ii) dated 10 September 1966;, has been cancelled.

[No. CMD/13:7.]

New Delhi, the 21 st August 1969

S. O. 3583—In pursuance of sub-regulation (3) of regulation 7 of the Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Regulations, 1955, the Indian Standards Institution hereby notifies that the marking tee (s) per unit for various products— —details of whick are given in the Schedule hereto annexed, have been determined and the fee(s) shall come into force with effect from 1 August i960 :

T HE SCHEDULE

Product/Class of Products

Unit

Serial No.

No. and Title of Relevant

Indian Standard

Marking Fee per Unit

1

2

4

3

5

1 Thiiam water dispersible powder

0-3 paise

One kg.

IS : 4766.1968 Specification for thiram water disper- sible powder

2 Thiram seed dressing formulations

o-3 paise

One kg.

IS : 4783-1968 Specification for thiram seed dressing for- mulations

[No. CMD/i3:i0]

9. O. 3584-—!n pursuance of sub-rule (1) of rule 4 of the Indian Standards Institution (Cer- tification Marks) Rules, 1955 the Indian Standards Institution hereby notifies that the Standard Maft(B), deslgn(s) of which together with the verbal description of the deBign(s) and the tkle(") of the relevant Indian Standard(s) are given in the Schedule hereto annexed, have been speci- fied.

These Standard Mark(s) for the purpose of the Indian Standards Institution (Certification, Marks) Act 1952 and the Rules and Regulations framed thereunder, shall come into force with effect from 1 August 1969 :

THE SCHEDULE

No. and Title of the

Si. Design of the No. Standard Mark

Product/Class of Product

Verbal description of the Design of the Stan-

Relevant Indian Stan- dard

dard Mark

1 2.

4

3

5

1 IS 14766

Thiram water dispersible powdei

IS 14766-1968 Speci- The monogram of the r fication for thiram Indian Standards Insti- water dispersible powder tution, consisting of le- tters *ISr, drawn in the exact style and rela- tive proportions as indicated in col. (2), the number, desig- nation of the Indian Standard being su- perscribed on the top side of the mo- nogram as indicated in the design.

2 IS:4?83

Thiiam seed die- sseing formuia- tionsj

IS 14783-1968 Specifi- cation for thiram seed dressing ior- mulotioni

The monogram of the Indian Standards Institution, consisting of letters 'ISI', drawn in the exact style and relative proportions as indi- cated in col. (2). the number3 designa- tion of the Indian Standard being su- perscribed on the top side of the monogram as indicated in the design.

[No. CMD/I3.-9J

S E C

.

3 S. O. 3565—tn pursuance of sub-regulation t,i) of Regulation 8 of the Indkn Standards lmtituiicn(Ceiti£caikii Marks). Regulation 1955 a as amended from rinretoon^thelndianStandards Insthntwnbeietv notifies that tbrrtyfij. licences, particulars ofwhich aregrvenmtbefoBowiBg Schedule, have been granted authorizing tbe licensees to use the Standard Marks:

(

H

) J

T HE SCHEDUIE

T H E

Name andAddressoftheLkensee

Period of Validity

Licence No.

Artick/Process covered by the Licence and tbe Relevant IS : Designation Serial No. (CM/L-) -

To

From

6

1

2

5

3

4

G A Z E T T E O F

I

N D

I

Structural steel standard quality}—IS : 226" 1

16-7-1969 15-7-1970

CM/L-2007,

A

1962.

7-7-1969

:

K.T. Rolling Mills Private Limited, Badalpur Road, Ambernath; Central Railway. Distt. Thana Maha- rashtra) having their office at K. T. Building, Broach Street, Dana Bunder, Borabay-9.

2

30-6-1970

1-7-1969

S E P T E CM/L-2008, 7-7-1969.

Thermoplastic insulated weatherprccl cables polytbeJerje insuJatedj taped, braided and compounded:

National Insulated Cable Co. of India Ltd., Shamnagar, 24 Parganas. West Bengal, having tieii Registered Office atNICCO House, a Hare Street, Cakutta-i.

Flat twin 250/440 and 650/1 100 Volts grade

with Aluminium conductors*—

M B E R 6

IS : 3035 (Partl)-I965.

,

16-7-1969 15-7-1970

3

1 9 6 9 CM/L-2009 7-7-1969

/

Omega Insulated Cable Co. (I) Ltd., Plot No. 16-17, Ambattur Industrial Estate; Madras-58, havirg their office at i-A, MungamleakkaTP High Road, Madras-34

Thermcplonk insulfKc v.eatherpTCoI cables porjtbekre insulated, taped, braided and compcurded : CO Single core 250/440 volts grade with

aluminium conduct ors.

(ti) Twin core flat 250/440 volts grade with

B H A D R A

aluminium conductors— IS : 3035 (Part II)—1965.

1 5

,

Ccmpourecc feeds for cattle—IS :2O52-I968 1-8-1969 31-7-1970

4 CM/L-2010 8-7-1969

Shavv- Wallsce & Co. Ltd., 84 Industrial SuViuls,Yesh- wantptir, Ban^lore-22 havirg their office at 8/9, Thambuchetty Street, Madras-i.

1 8 9 1

Processed solid smokeless domestic fuel—-IS :

Neyveli 1 ignite Corporaticn Limited; Neyveli-i (South

1-S-1969 31-7-1970

5

4286-1967,

Aicot District).

BHC emulsHiable concentrate^-IS : 632-

Central Insecticides & Fertilizers Saki Naka, Vihai Lake

15-7-1970

6

16-7-1969

1966.

Road, Bombay-72.

CM/L-2011 8-7-1969 CM/L-2OI2, 8-7-1969

3 7 8 9

3 7 J

I

2

6

5

3

4

> O

16-7-1969 I5-7-I97O

7 CM/L-2013 9-7-1969

Coveted electrodes for metaJ arc welding of mild steel , normal penetraiicrj tj^pe, sizes

D. & H. Secheron Electrodes Private Limited, 44/46, Industrial Estate, Laxmlbai Nagar, Indore-2 (M^.J.

T H E

Lndiciay, Plot No. 2, Udyog Nagar, S .V. Road, Goregaon

2 mm to 6 mm only—IS r 814-1967, DDT water dispersibk powder concentrate^"—

£

1-7-1969 31-1-1970

(West), Bombay-62.

It : 565-1961.

Three-phfu Equiiit'ctgeiEti-cucr cjoton. 16-7-1969 I5-7-I97O

9

CM/L-2014 9-7-1969 CM/L-2015 9-7-1969

YJfL Engineering Works, 44t Ideal Industrial Estale, Mathuradas Mill Compound, 124 DeEsle Road, Bombay-13.

G A Z E T T E

10

International Industries, 10 Ecmbay Tirrter Market,

16-7-1969 15-7-1970

Signal Hill Avenue, Reay Road, Bcmbay.

O F II

16-7-1969 30-6-1970

I

E.I.D.ParryLtd.,Rani|5et (North Arcot Distt.),having theiroflBceat DareHouse,PostBoxNo. i2,Madras-i

CM/L-2016 9-7-1969 CM/L-2017 10-7-1969

N D

I

0• 75few(1 HP)4400I41S0 voltsratingBonly witii class *A' insiilation>^—IS : 325S1961 Horizontal cylindexkai, high speed steam sterilzers. pressure type—IS : 4510-1968 Flushing cisterns for water clcsetE and orinals (valvekss siphonic tjpe), vitreous china : Low level;i5Litiecapadtyonlj'"-IS =774- 1964.

A

:

12

16-7-1969

Jay Chemicals, 14/1, Mathuia Road, Faridahad.

Endrin emulsifiable concentrates—IS : 1310- t15-7-197O

1958.

D DT water dispersible powder concentraies- 16-7-1969 15-7-1970

13

CM/L-2018, 11-7-1969 CM/L-2019 11-7-1969

IS : 565-1961,

S E P T E

Rhv Ions Pesticic e s & lasectkid e s Plo t No. 15. Nacharam Industrial Area, Hyderabad-39, ha% iiig theix Office at Shop No. 20, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Hvderatad-i. Krishna Miners & Traders, 12, Industrial Area, Jaipur Endrin emul&ifiable concentrates—IS : 1310- 16-7-1969

14

I5-7-197O

West, Rajasthan.

1958.

M B E R

15

16-7-1969 15-7-1970

CM/L-2020 15-7-1969 CM/L-2021 22-7-1969

6

,

ThermopIasiicinEulaUc i r e t l i a p cc i cables porytielete insulatec¹, taped, braided and , compounded, single core, 650/1 lcorolt

Henley Cables India Ltd., Henley House, HadapEar Industrial Estate , Post Box No. 7a, Poona - 1, having their Registered Office at Henley H°use, Ballard Estate Bombay-1.

grade with aluminium conductors only IS : 3O535(Part-I)-l965.

1 9 6 9

/

16

Domestic pressure cookers. 6-Litre capacity—

1-8-1969

Gupta Engineering Works, Rairway Road, Kapwthala.

31-7-1970

I S; 2347-1966.

1-8-1969 31-7-1970 AgkRamKhanna & Sons. 30S/1-E, Sbahzada Bagh.O'd Waterctoset seats and covers type 'A'—IS:

17

Rohtak Road, petti-7.'

2548-1967.

18

Tbirsm seed dressirg formulations?— IS :

1-8-1969 31-10-1970

B H A D R A

4783-1968.

CMJL-2022 23-7-1969 CM/L-2023 23-7-1969 CM/L-2024 23-7-1969

Alkali& ChemicaJ Corpoiaiicr. of India Ltd. .P. 0. Rishra Distt. Hooghiy, West Bengal having theii Regisieied Office at 34 Chovmnghee Road, Calcutta-16.

1 5

,

Thiram water dispersibk povrdeT—IS : 4766- 19

1-8-1969 31-10-1970

Ditto.

1968.

Jairsmdas Uoxcg PrnaK Lhniitt', Sib Wile, Mysore

20

16-8-1969 15-8-1970

1 8 9 1 CM/L-2025 23-7-1969 CM/L-2026 28-7-1969

[

Screwing taps of the follcvirg tapes : (0 Hand tape, ground coane pitch ; (tt) Marine tape groucd caorse pitch, types

Road, Kengeri P.O Bangalore South (Mysoic State), having their office at Silver Jnblke Park Road, Banga- lore-2.

A & C and

P A R T

(Hi) Machine tap ground fine pitcl*—IS :198s

I I

1962.

—

Stranded aluminium condectors (AAC) onry- 31-7-1970

21

I-8-1969

S E C

IS : 398-JS61.

.

CMJL-2027 28-7-1969

3

a

Devendra Wire Works, A-3, Plot No. 22-23, tJdhna In- dustrial Estate. Udhna. Distt Surat, Gujarat Stale, having their office at KalaMehta's Street. Sagrsmpui Snrat-23 Gujarat State.

( i i ) ]

Mflkand Inm & Steel Works limited. Belapur Road,

22

31-7-1970

1-8-1969

CM/L-2O28t 35-7-1969

Karwe', Thana.

Hot rolled mild steel medium tensile steel and high yield strength steel deformed bars for concrete reinforcements — IS : 1139-

Tr\AA l y O O.

Ditto.

1-8-1969 31-7-1970

Cold twisted steel bars lor concrete reinforce 23

ment IS : 1786-1966.

1-8-1969 31-7-1570 Kwality Ice Creams Co., 7 Regal Bnildings.Ne'w Delhi- Ice-cream, variety "Vanila"—IS : 2802-1964.

24

MulktRajMadbUfutii:L3l& Co.,E-8, Industrial Area.

1-8-1969 31-7-1970

Phwccd tea-chest battens—IS : 10-1964.

25

T H E G A Z E T T E

Yamuna Nagar,Distt.AnrbalaCHaiayana).

CM/L-2029 25-7-1969 CMJL-2030 25-7-1969. CM/L-2031 25-7-1969

O F

I

Vijaya Industries, S.M. Street; Sharanur-i, Distt. Pal-

26

15-8-1970

16- 8-1969

ghat, Kerala State.

N D

Mortice locks (vertical type), 65 mm, Size 4 lever type.—IS : 2209-1966. AiflJirt, outeis of the following tvpes :

I 16-8-1969 15-8-1970

27

A CM/L-2032 28-7-1969 CMfL-2033 28-7-1969

:

(i) Shell end mills HSS, types N ; and (it) Parallel shank end mills, :HSS type N—

Addison & Company Limited, 4 & 18 Smith's Road. MoantRoadjMadras-2,havingtheirRegd. Office at 158, Mount Road, Madras-2.

IS : 1830-1961.

|

Reamers of the following types :

Do.

16-8-1969

28

15-8-197°

S E P T E CMJL-2034 28-7-1969

(i) Machine bridge reamers HSS and (H) Shell Reamers HSS—IS : 1836-1961. Structural steel (standard qualhy)-IS : 226- 1-8-1969

29

31-7-1970

M B E R

1962.

Shiee Vishnu RoUiog Mills, 2 Kumar Para Lane, Lilooah Howrah having their office at 205 Ravindra Sarani,

GM/L-2035 28-7-1969

6

,

Structural steel (ordinary quality)—IS ; 1977-

Do.

30

1-8-1969

31-7-197°

1962.

1 9 6 9

Linseed oil, boiled for paints—IS : 77-1950,

Bhagsons Paints Industries (India)- 76-A. D LF IndtB-

/ 1-8-1969 31-7-1970

31

CM/L-2036 28-7-1969 CM/L-2037 28-7-1969

trial Area, Najafgarh Road, New DeIhi-15.

Sanifix India Private L t d . / 5 ' N, Road, P.O. Dassnagar.

1-8-1969 31-7-1970

32

Belgachhia, Howrah.

CM/L-2038 31-7-1969

B H A D R A

C.I. flushings cisterns for water closets and urinals (valveless spihonic type) high level; 10 Litre and 12-5 litres capacity only— IS : 774-I964-

1 5

Tea-Chest metal fittings—IS : 10-1964.

,

S>K. BakeiAli&Co.,65PhearLane,Cafcutta-i2.

1-8-1969 31-7-1970

33

Endosulfan emulsifiable concentrates—IS:

1-8-1969 31-7-1970

34

1 1 1 9 1

4325-1967.

CM/L-2039 31-7-1969 CM/L-2040 31-7-1969

E.IX>. Pany limited, Ran^et, North Arcot District, Tamil Najlu having their office at Dare House, Post Box No. 12, Madras-i.

3 7 9 1

3 7 9 I

2

6

2 3

4

5

T H E

16-8-1969 15-8-1970 Salt Glazed Pipe Factor v.JnEClicrRoadjVriddhachalim,

35

South Arcot, District (Tamil Nadu).

Salt glazed stoneware straigrrt pip" of dia- meter 100 mm only —IS : 651-1965.

CM/L-2041 31-7-19^9

16-8-1969

Clinical thermcmeterf—]S : 3055-1965.

Ideal Thermometers, Raj Garh Road. Solan (H.P.)

15-8-1970

CM./L-2042 31-7-1969

G A Z E T T E

[No. CMD/i3:ii] O F

I

N D

A. K. GUPTA, Deputy Director General.

I

A

:

S E P T E

M B E R

6

,

1 9 6 9

/

B H A D R A

1 5

,

1 8 9 1

I

P A H T

I I

—

CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

INCOME TAX

New DM, the 27th May, 1969

8.O.35S6— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 122 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabling it in that tehalf and in supersession of all previous notifications in this regard, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that the Appellate Assistant Commissioners °f Income-tax of the Ranges specified in Column 1 of the Schedule below shall perform their functions in respect of all persons and incomes assessed to Income-tax or Super-tax in the Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts specified in the correspond- ing entry in column 2 thereof.

SCHEDULE

Range

Income-tax Circles, Wards cr District*

1

2

A-Range, Madras

1. Company Circle II (all Sectioned, Madras. 2. City Circle I Madras. 3. City Circle I I I. Madras. 4. City Circle V. Madras. 5. City Circle VI. Madras. 6. Foreign Sections. Madras. 7. Estate Duty-cvirn-Irccme-to Circle. Madras. 8. Tax Recovery Circle, Madras.

B-Rangc, Madras

C-Range, Madras

D-Range, M a dm

1. Special Investigrticr Circle ' / '. Madras. 2. Special Invefltigatier Circle *E\ Madras. 3. Central Circles I to XVII, MsdiaB. 4. Cuddalore Circle (all Sections). 5. Fondlcherry Circle (all Sections). 1. Companies Circle I (all Sections), Madrrt. 2. HUIK i Circle I Madras. 3. Special Survey Circle (all Sections), Madras. 4. Hundi Circle II. Madras. 5. Salaries Circle, Mai ras. 6. Salaries Circle I, Madras. 7. Salaries Circle II) Madras. 1. City Circle II (all Sections), Madras, 2. Kanchceptirrm Circle. 3. Thanjavur Circle (all Sections). 4. Estate Duty-cum-Itccmc u> Circle, Tbwija-

vur.

5. Nagapattirrm Circle (till Eectkrt). 6. Kumbakonam Circle (all Sections).

E-Range, Madras

Tiruchirapalli Range . . ..

1. City Circle IV Mac¹ rats. 2. City Circle VII (all Sections), Madras. 3. Vellorc Circle. 1. lirucHnrdii Circle. 2. City Circle I (all Section*). Tiruchirrriili. 3- Company Circle, TiruchirBirdli. 4. Pumkottei Circle (all Ftcticit\ 5. Karaikucii Circle (all Sections).

Madurai Range

Range

Income-tax Circles, Wards or District r

I

2

Salem Range

i. Salem Circle. 2. Company Circle, Salem. 3. Circle I, Salem. 4. Circle II, Salem. 5. Erode Circle (all Sections). 6: Cotacamund Circle (all Sections).

Coimbatore Range . . . ..

t. Coimbatore Circle. 2. Special Survey Circle, Coimbatorc. 3. Special Investigation Circle, Coimtatore. 4. Circle I, Coimbatore. 5. Circle II, Coimbatore. 6. City Circle I, (all Sections), Coimbatore. 7. City Circle 11 (all Sections), Coimbatore. 8. Central Circles I and II, Coimbatore. 9. All Company Circles, Coimbatorc.

10. Salary Circle, Coimbatore. 11. EBtate Duty-cum-Income-tax Circle, Coim-

batore.

iz, Pollachi Circle (all Sections). 13. Tlrupur Circle. 14. EXCCBS Profits Tax Circles, Coimbatore and

Erode.

Where an Income-tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof sTands transferred by this notification from one Range to anothdr Ranee, appeals erisirg out of assessments made in that Income-tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof and pending immediately tefore the date of thli notification before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of the Range from whom that Income- tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred shall, from the date this notification shall take effect be transferred to and dealt with by the Appellate Assistant Commissionere of the Range to whom the said Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred.

This notification shall take effect from the 2nd June, 1969-

Explanatory Note

The amendments have become necessary on account of re-organisation of the AAC's Ranges.

(The above note doeg not form a part of the notification but is intended to be merely clarificatory).

[No. 58 (F. No. 50(32169-] )]

New Delhi, the 2ith May 1969

S-O. 3587,—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 122 of the I.T. Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following further amendments in the Schedule appended to its notification No. 12 (F. No. 50/7/66-ITJ) dated 14-1-1966 as amended from time to time, namelj :

In the said Schedule against—

j I, "E"—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. Companies District I, Calcutta.

(Other than 'A¹ to 'E' Wards)

II. 'Z'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

I. Companies District I, Calcutta.

('Arto 'E* Wards),

III. 'I'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

IV. 'J'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. Dist. IV(I), Calcutta. 2. Special Survey Circle-VI.

V. 'N'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. Midnapore. 2. Cinema Circle-I, Calcutta. 3. Cinema Circlc-II, Calcutta. 4. Cinema Circle, Calcutta. 5. Dist. V(A), Calcutta. 6. Nadia.

VI. 'H'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. DiBt. III(I), Calcutta. 2. Project Circle-II, Calcutta. 3. F. D. Cum-I.T. Circle. 4. Special Circlc-I, Calcutta.

VII. 'V—Rang^ Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. Dist. 111(2), Calcutta.

(Other than *A' to 'H'—-Wards)

2. Special Survey Circlc-IX, Calcutta.

(newly created)

3. Special Survey Circle-I, Calcutta.

Vill. 'L'—Range, Calcutta, following shall be substituted :

1. 1(1), Calcutta.

(Other than 'A' to 'E¹—Wards)

2. Special Survey Circle-II, Calcutta. 3. Murshidabad.

SCHEDULE

1.

2.

2

I

(v) Salary circle, Jullundur [in respect of persons who reside In the jurisdiction of Distts. I, II and III.'Ov), Amritsar].

2. In respect of orders passed by the Income-tax

Officers after 14-7-1967. (i) Distt. I(i), Amritear. (il) Distt. I (ii), Amritsar. flii) Add!. Dhtt. I (ii) , Amritsar. (iv) Distt. I (iii), Amritsar. (v) Addl. Distt. I(iii), Amritsar. (vi) Distt. I(iv), Amritsar. (vii) Distt. 1 0, Amrittar. (viii) Addl. Distt. I(v), Amritsar. fix) Distt. I(vi), Amrif=nr. (x) Addl. Distt. Kvi), Amrhaar.

3. All Income-tax Circ)c8 Wards or Districts

having headquarters at Mandi.

4. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect oi persons who reside in the district of Mandi).

1. All Income-tax Circles. Wards or Districts B—Range, Amiltsar

having headquarters at Be tola.

2. In respect of the orders passed by the Income- tax Officers upto and including 14-7-1967.

G) Districts III(i), Ill(ii), lll(lii) l l l ( v)

and III(vj), Amritear.

(ii) Central Circles I, II, III, Amritear. (iii) Special Survey Circle, Ajnritfer [in respect of persons who have their princi- pal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Diwt. IJI(i\ J]I{ii), III(iii), III(v) anc Ill(vi), '/mriteer, Central Circles I, II, III, Amrittar and Batata.]

(iv) Salarj' Circle. Jullundur [in respect of personswho rcrit e in the iurisc'ictioo of Distts. 111(1), III(ii), IIK'iii), III(v) and Ill(vi), Amritefir Ctntnl Circlet 1,11, III, Amntsar and BatsJuj.

3. In respect of orders passed by the Income-

tax Officers after 14-7-J 967.

f i) Distt. 17(1) to Il(iii), Amritsar. (11) Central Circles, Amrittar.

. 1. All Income-tax Circles, wards or Districts C—Range, Amritwr. . ..

hsvirg heatquamrr et /mritfri c i lu than thoft¹ mentkrec in columr 2 arovt tgainst A—Rurge-Amritsaram I —Rargc Amritsar. 2. All Income-tax Circles, Wprcs cr Distrfcto

having heuc quartcrf (it Fc?hifrrur.

3. Speclnl Survey Circle Amriifir fin r r r c ct cf persons who have their rrircij-nj pl^ce of business in <-i reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax OfEcert, Hoshiarpur.)

4. Salary Circle Jullum m (in respect of pertons who resk e in the jurisdiction oi Iiiconie-Ux OflBcers, Hoshiarpur.)

S E C. 3 ( H) ] T HE G A Z E T TE OF I N D I A: S E P T E M B ER 6 , 1 9 6 9 / B H A D RA 1 5 , 1 8 01 3 7 97

I

2

Tullundur

1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts

having headquarters at :—

(i) Jullundur, (ii) Khanna.

2. Special Survey Circle, Amritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Jullundur and Khanna).

3. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respect of persons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers Jullundur and Khanna).

A . R a n g e, L u d h i a n a. . . .. T. AU Income-tax Circles, Wards or District^

having headquarters at:—

Q) Sir8a, fit) Moga, (iii) Sangrur

2. Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana. 3. B-Ward, Ludhiana. 4. Addl. B-Ward, Ludhiana. 5. E-Ward, Ludhiana. I 6, Central Circle, Ludhiana.

7. Special Survey Circle, Amritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of In- come-tax Officers, Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana, B-Ward, Ludhiana, Addl, B- Ward, Ludhiana and E-Ward, Ludhiana, Central Circle, Ludhiana and Moga).

8. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the Jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Sirsa and Sangrur).

9. Salary Circle , Jullundur (in respect of persons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana, B-Wardi Ludhiana, Addl. B-Ward, Ludhiana, E-Wwd, Ludhiana, Central Circle, Ludhiana, Sksa, Moga and Sangrur).

B - R a n g e, L u d h i a n a. . . .. 1. All-Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts having headquarters at Ludhiana other than those mentioned in column 2 above against A-Range, Ludhiana.

2. Special Survey Circle, Amritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers at Ludhiana other th"n those mentioned in column 2 above against A-Pangc, Ludhiana).

3. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respect of pers one who reside in the jurist: iction of Income-tax Officers at Ludhiana other than those men- tioned in column 2 above against A-Range, Ludhiana),

T. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts A - R a n g e, Patiala

having headquarters at:—

(i) Chancigarh, (ii) Hissar.

2

I

2. Companies Circle, Patiala (except in respect of persons presently assessable by the Income- tax Officers, Companies Wards, Rohtak).

3. B-Ward, Patiala.

4. Additional B-Ward, Patiala.

5. C-Ward, Patiala.

6. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of busi- ness in or reside in the jurisdiction of Income- tax Officers, Chandigarh, Hissar, B-Wardj Patiala, Addl. B-Ward, Patiala, C-Wardj Patiala, and Companies Circle, Patiala except in respect of persons presently assessable by the Income-tax Officer, Companies Ward, RohTak).

7. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respett of pel sons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Chandigarh, Hissar, B-Ward, Patiala, Addl. B-Ward, Patiala, C-Ward, Patiala and Companies Circle, Patiala, (except in respcet of persons presently assessable by the Income- tax-Officer, Companies Ward, Rohtak).

1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts B-Rangc, Patiala.

having headquarters at :—

fi) Bhatinda, (ii) Fcrozcpur, (iii) Abohar, (iv) Jind.

2. All Income-tax CircleSj Wards or Districts having headquarters at Patiala other than those mentioned in column 2 above against A-Rangc, Patiala.

3. Special Survey Circle, Arnritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of In- come-tax Officers, Ferozepur and Abohar).

4. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Bhatinda, Jind and In- come-tax Officers at Patiala other than those mentioned in Column 2 above againt A- Range, Patiala).

5. Salary Circle, JuUundur (in respect of persons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Bhatinda, Jind, Ferozepur, and Abohar and Income-tax Officers at Patiala oither than those mentioned in column 2 above against A-Range, Patiala).

Ambalu. . . . . .. 1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts

having headquarters at:—

(.i) Ambala, (ii) Yamunanagar, (iii) Karnal, (iv) Panipat, (v) Simla.

I

2

2. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect' of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the Districts of Ambale, Karnal and Simla-

3. Salary Circle, Jullundur ( in respect of persons who reside in the Districts of Ambalajand Kamal).i

A-Rangej Rohtak

. 1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts

having headquarters at Sonepat.

2. A-Ward, Rohtak. 3. B-Ward, Rohtak. 4. Companies Ward, Rohtak. 5. Companies Circle, Patiala (in reBpcct of persons presently assessable by the Income-taX Officers, Companies Ward, Rohtak).

6. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of In- come-tax Officers, Soncpat, A-Ward, Rohtakj B-Ward, Rohtak, Companies Ward4 Rohtak and Companies Circle, PatiaUa in respect of persons who arc presently assessable by the Income-tax Officer, Companies Ward, Rohtak).

7. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respect of per- sons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income- tax Officers, Soncpat, A-Ward, Rohtak, B- Ward, Rohtak, Companies Ward, Rohtak and Companies Circle, Patiala in respect ofpersona who are presently assessable by the Income* tax Officer, Companies Ward. Rohtak).

1. All Income-tax circles. Wards or Districts, 8-Range; Rohwfc

having head-quarters at:—

(i) Gurgaon, (ii) Faridabad.

2. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or District* having headquarters at Rohtak other than those mentioned in column 2 against A" Rangc, Rohtak.

3. Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of busi- ness in or reside in the Jurisdiction of Income- tax Officers, Gurgaon, Faridabad and the In- come-tax Officers at Rohtak other than those mentioned in column 2 against A-Rangej. Rohtak). *

4. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respect of persons who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Gurgaon, Faridabad, and the Income-tax Officers at Rohtak other than those mentioned in column 2 against A-Range, Rohtak).

Jammu. •

1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts,

having headquarters at:—

(i) Jammu, (ii) Srinagar, (ill) Pathankot.

I

2

2. Special Survey Circle, Amritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Pathankot).

3. Salary Circle, Jullundur ( in respect pf persons who reside in the Jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Pathankot).

Where an Income-tax Circle, Ward and District or part thereof stands transferred by this 1 otification from one Range to another Range, appeals arising out of assessments made in that I ncome-tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof and pending immediately before the date of this notification before the Appalkte Assistant Commissioner of Range, from whom that Income- tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred shall, from the date this notification shall take effect, be transferred to and dealt with by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of the Range to whom the said Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred.

This notification shall take effect from 1-6-1969.

Explanatory Note.—

The revision of jurisdiction has become necessary on account of re-organisation of the ap- pellate Ranges in the Commissioners charge.

(The above note does not form a part of the notification but is intended to be merely clarifl- catory).

[No. 60 (F. No. 50/41/69-ITJ)].

S. O. 3589 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the Section 122 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabling it in that behalf and in supersession of all the previous notifications in this regard, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax of the Ranges specified in column 1 of the Schedule below, shall perform their functions in respect of all persons and incomes assessed to income-tax or Super-tax in the Income-tax Circles, Wards and Districts, specified in the corresponding entry in column 2 thereof.

SCHEDULE

Range

Income-tax Circles, Wards and Districts

1

2

A-Range, Jaipur

1. B, C, E, J, K & M. Wards, Jaipur. 2. All Companies circles having headquarters

at Jaipur.

3. Special Survey circles I & II, Jaipur.

B-Rangc, Jaipur

1. A. D , F, G, H wards, Jaipur and Special

Ward, Jaipur.

2. Special Investigation Circles, A&B Jaipur. 3. All central circles having headquarters at

Jaipur.

4- Estate Duty Circle, Jaipur. 5. All salary circles having Headquarters at

Jaipur.

6. Special Assessment circles I, II & III, Jaipur.

7. Special Assessment Circle, Jaipur.

I

2

A-Range, Jodhpur

1. A, D, F & M Wards, Jodhpur. 2. Companies circle, Jodhpur. 3. Special Survey Circle, Jodhpur. 4. AU Income tax Wards having Headquarters

at Pall.

5. All Income tax wards having Headquarter*

at Sirohi.

B-Range, Jodhpur

1. B,C,Ej & G wards, Jodhpur. 2. Special Assessment Circle, Jodhpur. 3. All wards having Headquarters at Nagaur. 4,. Special Assessment Circles, I & II, Jodhpui 5. A-I Ward, Jodhpur. c

Udaipur Range, Udalpur

1. AU Income tax wards and circles having head

quarters at Udaipur. 2. Chittorgarh Circle- \ 3. Bhllwara Circle.

Bikanar Range, Bikaner

1. All Income tax wards having headqarters at

Bikaner.

2. AU Income tax wards having headquarters at

Srlganganagar.

1. AU Income tax ward*, having headquarters at AJmer Range, Ajmer

Ajmcr.

2. Bcawar Circle. 3. AU Income tax wards having headquarters at

Alwar.

4. Sikar Cicle. 5. Jhunjhunu Circle.

1. AU Income tax wards having headquarters at Kota Range, Kota

Kota.

2. Bharatpur Circle. 3. Swaimadhopur Circle.

Where an Income tax Circle, Ward or district or part thereof stands transferred by this noti- fication from one Ranpe to another Range, appeal arising out of assessments made in that Income- tax circle, ward or district or part thereof and pending immediately before the date of the notification before ihc Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income tax of the Range from whom that Incometax circle, Ward or district or part thereof is transferred shaU, from the date ttui notification shaU take effect, be transferred to and dealt with by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Incometax of the range to whom the said circle, ward or district or part thereof j" traniferred.

This notification shall take effect from 1st June, 1969.

Btplanatory note

The amendment has become nece&sary on account of reaUocation of jurisdiction of AAOg-

(The above note does not form a part of the notification but is intended to be merely clarifica- tory).

[No. 61 (F. No. 50/42/69-ITJ).]

S.O. 359O.^In cxeiciscof the fowera conferred by siib-tection (1) of section 122 of the Income- tBX Act, 1961 (43 of T96i)and of eW other powers enabling it ID that behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes,herebvrnakesiriefoUov'irRsrrcrdireruin the Schedulesprened to its Notification N o. 12 (F. No. 50/4/68-lTJ) dated 14th January- J?693 namely :_

In the said Schedule under the existing entries irj Co]. 2 against (i) A-Range, Hyderabad, (3) G-RaDge, Hyderabad, (3) Vijayawada and (4) Guntur, the following shall be substituted, namely;—

SCHEDULE

           Range                          Income-tax Circles,  wards and Districts
          1                                                 2
A-Range,  Hyderabad                      1.  Circle—I,  Hyderabad.
                                         2.  Ward—I-A, Hyderabad  Circle.
                                         3.  Ward—I-B, Hyderabad  Circle.
                                         4.  Ward—I-C, Hyderabad  Circle.
                                         5,  Ward—I-D, Hyderabad  Circle.
                                         6.  Ward—I-E, Hyderabad  Circle.
                                         7.  Circle—I (old), Hyderabad.  1
                                         g.  A—Ward, Hyderabad.         ,  ,
                                         9.  I. T.-cum-W.T.  Circle,—1^Hyderabad.
                                        10.  Salary  Circle,  Hyderabad.
                                        11.  Warangal.
                                        12.  Karimnagar.
                                        13.  Khammam.
C-Range,   Hyderabad                     1.  Circle—III, Hyderabad.
                                         2.  Company Ward of SectindcrBbsd Circle, Hyderabad.
                                         3.  Compeny Circle, Hyderabad.      n  t   '  s.
                                          4.  Company Circle (old), Hyderabad. *      '
                                          5. Ward—III-A,  Sacunderabad  Circle,  Hyderabad.
                                         6.  Ward—III-B,  Secunderabad  Circle, Hyderabad.
                                         7.  Ward—IJT-C,  Secunderabad  Circle,  Hyderabad.
                                         8,  Ward—III-D,  SecunderabBd  Circle, Hyderabad.
                                         9.  Ward—III-E,  Secunderabad  Circle,  Hyderabad.
                                         10. Circle—III (old), Hyderabad.
                                        I I. C—Ward,  Hvdwabad.
                                         12.  I. T.-cum-yt.T.  Circle—III, Hyderabad.
                                        13.  Central Circle, Hyderabad.
                                         14. Central Circle (old),  Hyderabad.
                                        15.  Project  Circle, Hyderabad. %
                                        16.  M.P.P. Circle,  Hyderabad.
                                        17.  Kurnool.
                                        18.  Mahaboobnagar.
                                        19.  Kothagudem.
                                        30.  Recovery Circle, Hyderabad.
 Vijayawada  Range, Vijayawada           1.  Vijayawada.
                                         2.  MflBUlipatam.
                                         3.  Gudivada.
                                         4.  Tanuku.
                                         5.  Eluru.
 Guntur  Range,  Guntur                   1.  Guntur.
                                          2.  Tenali.
                                          3. Bapatla.
                                         4.  Nellore.
                                          5. Nica Circle, Nellore (old).
                                          6.  Tirupathi.

This notification shall take effect from 1-7-69.

Explanatory Note:

The amendments have become necessary on account of the re-allocation of the jurisdiction of the AACs, (1) A-Range, Hyderabad (2) C-Range, Hyderabad (3) Vijayawada (4) Guntur.

(The above note does not form a part of the notification but Is intended to be merely clariflcatory).

[No. 62(F. No. 5 0 / 3 4 / 8 0 L I T J ) .]

N"ro Delhit tht xixh June, 1969.

S.O.359*.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Eecticn (1) of fecticn 112 of tre Irctjx,e- Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabling it In that behalf, the Central Ecard of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendments in the schedule appended to ,it Notification No. 97(F. No. 50/12/68—ITJ) dated the 7th October, 1968 as modified by its Notificaticn No. 112 (F. No. 50/12/6B—ITJ) dated the 8th November, 1968 namely :

In the said schedule against A-Rangc, G-Range, H-Range, I-Rarige, M-Rerge, N-Rtrge, New Delhi un^er column 2 the following shall be substituted.

Ranges

Income-tax Circled, Wards end Districts

¹

2

Companies Circles IV, VII, V i l l, X, XIII, XIV, 2. B-II, B-HU), B-III, B-III(I), B-1V, E-1V(I), B-V, B-V(I), B-X, B-XI and B-XICD Districtp, KT^iu' TVIm1 N CW J—'CJ44-1.

New Delhi, the 13th June 1969

S.O. 3592.—In exercise of the powers conferred toy sub-section (1) of section 122 of the Incometax Act. 1961 (43 of 1861), and all other powers enabling it in that behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby make the following further amendment in the schedule appended to Its notification No. 72 P. No. 50/6/68-ITJ dated 20th August, 1968, viz, :—

"Against AAC 'A' Range, Nagpur, Under Col. 2 the following shall be

added :—

S. No- (19) ITO Asstt. I, Gondia. S. No. (20) ITO Asstt. II, Gondia. S. No. (21) ITO Betul.

This Notification shall take effect from 16th June, 1969.

Explanatory Note,

Th" amendment has become necessary on account of creation at new Circles, namely, Asst. I, Gondia, Asst. II, Gondia and Batul and to assign appellate juris- diction to the newly created circles In the Commissioner's charge,

(The above note does from not form part of the notiflcatiom but it intended to be merely clariflcatory).

£No. 74(F, No. 50/3S/69-ITJ.)]

S.O. 3593.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 122 of the Income-tax Act 1961 (43 of 1961) and all other powers enabling it in that behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby make the fellowtng further amendment in the schedule appended to its Notification No. 72 F. No. 50/6/68-ITJ dated 20th August, 1968, viz:—

(1) Against AAC 'A' Range, Indore Under Col. 2, the following shall be add- ed:—

S. No. (E" ITO Mhow.

(2) Against AAC Ratlam, Under Col. 2, the following shall be added:—

S- No. (7) ITO Char.

This notification shall take effect 1st July, 1969.

Explanatory Mot*.

The amendment has becorofl necessary on account of the creation of new Circles, namely Mhow and Bhflr, and to assign appellate jurisdiction to these newly created circles, In the Commissioner's Charge.

(The above note does not form part of the notification, but is intended to be merely clariflcatory).

[No. 75 (F. No. 50/35/69-ITJ)].

New Delhi, the 20th June 1969

S.O. 3594.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (i) of Section 122 of the In- :omctax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabllngit in that behalf and in supersession of aljprcvious notifications in this regard, the Central Board ofDirect Taxes hereby directs that th< Appellate Assistant Commissioners of Incom etax of the Ranges specified in column 2 of the Schedule below shall perform the functions inrespect of all persons and incomes assessed to income- tax or supertax in the Thcometax Circles, Wards and Pistrkts specified in the corresponding entry in column 3 thereof:—

SCHEDULE

S. No.

Ranges

Incometax Circles, Wards & Districts

1

2

3

1 Range I, Allahabad

1. A, B & C Wards, Allahabad. 2. Salary, Circle, Allahabad. 3. Estate, Duty cum Incometax Circle, Allahabad 4. Gonda. 5. Faizabad.

2

I

3

2 Range II, Allahabad

1. D, E & F Wards, Allahabad. 2. Mirzapur.

Bareilly . . ..

3

1. Bareilly. 2. Nainital. 3. Shahjahanpur. 4. Haldwani. 5. Pllibhit. 6. Budaun. 7. Almora. 8. Kashipur.

Range I, Lucknow .

4

1. Circle I, Lucknow. 2. Circle I I, Luclcnow which existed upto

31-5-1968. 3. Lakhimpur Kheri. 4. Luckncrw.

Range II, Lucknow .

•5

1. Circle II, Lucknow (created w.e.f. 1-8-68). 2. Companies Circle, Lucknow. 3. Salary Circle, Lucknow. 4. Special Survey Circle, Lucknow. 5. Estate Duty cum Income-tax, Circle, Lucknow. 6. Hardoi. 7. Project Circle, Lucknow. 8. Sitapur.

6 Moradabad

1. Moradabad. 2. Rampur. 3. Bulandshahr. 4- Najibabad.

Range I, Varanasi

7

T. A to F Wards, Varanasl, 2. Special Circkj Varanasi. 3. I.T.O. Collection, Varanasi. 4. Gorakhpur. 5. Jaunpur. 6. Bastj.

S Range II, Varanasi .

1. G, H & J Wards, VaranaBl. 2. Special Survey Circle, Varanasi. 3. Project Circles Varanasi. 4. Ballia. 5. Azamgarh. 6. I.T.O. Administration, Varanasi.

Where an Income-tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof stands transferred by this notification from one range to another Range, appeals arising out of asseBamentE made in that Income- tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof and pending immediately before the date of tWs noti- fication before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of the Range from whom that Income-WC Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred shall, from the date this notification take effect, be transferred to and dealt with by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner ol the Range to whom the said circle. Ward or part thereof is transferred.

This notification shall take effect from the 23rd June, 1969.

[No- 83 (F. No. 50/44/69.ITJ).]

New Delhi, the joth June, 1969

S.0.3595. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 122 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabling it in that tehalf and in supersession of all the previous notifications In this regard, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby directs that the Appellate Assiirant Commissioners of Income-tax, of the Rangts specified in column (1) of the Schedule below shall perform their functions in respect of all persons and incomes assessed to Income-tax or Super-tax in the Income-tax Circles by the Income-tax Officers specified in the corresponding entry in Column. (2) thereof.

SCHEDULE

Income-tax Circles & Income-tax Officers Range

1

2

Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-

tax, " A" Range, Bangalore.

1. Bangalore City Circle-I. 2. Bangalore City Circle-Ill. 3. Kolar Circle. 4. Company Circle, Bangalore. 5. Chltradurga Circle. 6. Tumkur Circle. 7. Estate Duty atm Income-tax ClrcJe, Manga-

lore.

8. Mangalore Circle. 9. Udipl Circle.

10. In respect of orders passed under the Income- tax Act by the following Income-tax Officers of Bangalore Circle, Bangalore.

I.T.O.,Admn., I.T.O.jAsst. (1) I.T.O.,Asst. (2> I.T.O.,Asst. (3) I.T.O.,Asst. (8) I.T.O.,Asst. (9)

11, Circle-I, Bangalore.

II, Appellate Assistant Commissioner of In-

come-tax, " B" Range, Bangalore.

x. Bangalore City Circle-II. a. Special Survey Circle, Bangalore. 3. Salary Circle, Bangalore. 4. Central Ctrde-I & II, Bangalore. 5. Mysore Circle. 6. CoorgClrcle, Mercara. 7- E.D. cum I.T. Circle, Bangalore. 8. In respect of orders passed under the Income- tax Act by the following Income-tax Officer* of Bangalore Circle, Bangalore.

I,T.O.,Asst. (4) I.T.O.jAsst. (5) I.T,O.,Asst. (6j I.T.O.,Asst. (7) I.T.O.,Asst.(io) I.T.O., Collection.

9. CIrcle-II, Bangalore.

III. Appellate Assistant Commissioner of In-

come-tax, Dharwar Range, Dharwar.

1. Dharwar Circle. 2. Hubli Circle. 3. Karwar Circle. 4. Bcllary Circle, f. E.D. cum I.T. Circle, Dharwar. 6. Shimoga Circle. 7. Hassan Circle.p 8. Davangcre Circle.

I

2

1. Eelgaum Circle,

IV. Appellate Assistant Commissioner of In-

come-tax, BelgftUm "Range, Belgaum.

, 2. Bijapur Circle. ' 3. Panaji Circle, Goa.

4. Ralchur Circle. 5. Gulbarga Circle. 6. Margao Circle.

Where an Income-tax Circle, Ward or District or part thereof stands, trEnEferred ty this •Notification from one range to another rarge, appeals arising out of assessments made in that Income- tax Circle, Ward, District or part thereof end pending immediately before the date of this notifica- tion before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax of the Barge from whom the Income-tax Circle. Ward or District or part thereof is transferred shall, from the date of this noti- fication take effect, be trasferred to and dealt with by the Appellate Assistant Ccnimissifirer of Income-tax ofthe Range to whom the said Circle, Ward or District or part thereof is transferred.

This notification shall take effect from 1-7-1969.

Explanatory Note

The amendment has become neceSFary in order to assign appellatejurisdlclion over two newly- created circles namely, Bangalore City Circle I and Bargalore Citv Circle II and to revise appellate jurisdiction over Estate Duty Gum I.T. Circle, Bangalore and E.D. Cum I.T. Circle, Mangalore.

(This does not form a part of the notification but is intended to be merely clarificatory).

[No. 90 (F. No. 50/33/69—III)]

New Delhi, the 5th July, 1969.

S 0.3596-In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (1) of Section 122 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and of all other powers enabling it in that behalf, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendments in the Schedule appended to its Notification No. 60 (50/41/69—ITJ), dated 28th May, 1969 namely:—

In the sold Schedule, against B-Range, Amritsar, A-Ranfe, Ludhiana and Ambala Range for the entries undev column 2, the following entries shall be substituted namely :-~

B —R a n g e, A m rl tsar . . . .. 1. A ll I n c o m e - t ax Circles, W a r ds or D i s t r i c ts

having headquarters at Batata.

1. In respect of the orders passed by the Income-

tax Officers upto and including 14-7-1967.

(0 District I I I® Ill(ii), Ill(iii), III(v) and

Ill(vi), Amritsar.

(11) Central Circles, I, II and III, Amritsar,

(Hi) Central Circles I and II, Ludhiana.

(nf) Central Circle, Ambala.

(v~) Special Survey Circle, Amritsar [in respect of persons who have their principal place of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Distt. III(i), Ill(ii), Ill(iii), IU(v) and III(vi), Amritsar, Central Circle, I, II, H I, Amritsar, Central Circles, Ludhiana and Batala].

(tii¹) Special Survey Circle, Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business In or reside in the jurisdiction of Central Circle, Ambala).

(vii) Salary Circle, Xullundur [in respect of persons who reside in the jurisdiction of Distt. ilia), inGO, mam, iiirv) and incvi) Amritsar, Centra] Circles, I, II, III, Amritsar and Batala].

3, In respect of orders passed by the Income-tar

Officers after 14-7-1967,

(0 Distt. II(i) to HCiii), Amritsar. ("Q Central Circles, Amritsar. (iii) Central Circles, Ludhiana. ("V) Central Circle, Ambala.

1. All Income-tax Circles, Wards or Districts A*Ra

having hcadqaurters at:—

(0 Sirsa. (*0 Mogo. ("•'") Sangrur.

2. Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana. 3. B-Ward, Ludhiana. 4. Addl. B-Ward, Ludhiana. 5. E-Ward, Ludhiana.

6. Special Survey Circle, Amritsar (in respect of persons who have their principal place of busi- ness in or reside in the jurisdiction of income-tax Officers Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana, B-Ward, Ludhiana, Addl. B-Ward, Ludhiana and E-Ward, Ludhiana and Moga).

7. Special Survey Circle. Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal pkee of business in or reside in the jurisdiction of Ipcorne-t,ax Officers, Sirsa and Sangrur).

8. Salary Circle, Jujlundur fin respect of person* who reside in the jurisdiction of Income-tax Officers, Addl. A-Ward, Ludhiana, B-Ward, Ludhiana, Addl. B-Ward, Ludhiana, E-Ward Ludhiana, Sirsa, Moga and Sangrur).

Ambalft

T, All Income-tax Circles, Wards or District!

having headquarters at:—

(0 Ambala, Except Central Circle, ^mfcala. (it) Yamunanagar. ("V'O Karnal. (iv) Panipat. (v) Simla.

2. Special Survey Circle. Patiala (in respect of persons who have their principal place of business In or reside in the Districts of Ambala, Kamal and Simla).

3. Salary Circle, Jullundur (in respect of persons who reside in the Districts of Aa\te]e and Karnal),

This notification shall take effect from 6th July, j$69.

Explanatory Note

The amendments have become necesBary on account of re-allogation of work amongst the above appellate ranges.

ficatory).

(The above note does not form part of the notification but is intended to be morelyclarf, *

[No. 92{F, No. 50/41/69-ITJ).]

S. V. SUBBA RAO, Under Secy.

jh6 THE OAzferre OF mttw: si.rrEsiBi.1i e, W^/BJIADRA U, ISM [PAWII-

"Bt.3(HH THEGAZET5EWn"rtA:4B"?t"MWefe6, l"69/B&At>RA 15,18"t Wifr

INCOME-TAX

New Delhi, the 29th August 1969,

S. O.3S08.—In exercise of the po.vers conferred by aub-Section (1) of section 121 of the Cncama tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) the Central TCoard of Direct Taxes hereb" maVes the follow- in? atistidtnents to the Schedule appended to its Notification No. 20 F.No 55/1/62-ID dated the 3Ctn April, 1963, published as S.O. 1293 on pages 1454-14S7 of the Ga/etteof India, Part II Section 3, Sub-section (li), dated the itth May, 1963 as amended from time to time.

T. Existing entries under columns (1), (2) and (3,1 ajainit S.No. 7 shall be substituted hy the following entries:—

Income-tax

Commissioner

HeaJqiiarts'-s

Juriiiiciicn

(2)

(3)

W

New Delhi.

7. Delhi-I

1. District II 2. District III (24), (25), 26), (27), (18), (r.9),

(30), (31), (32), & 63}.

3. District IV (7), (8), (9), (ic) & (ii;. 4. District VI (ii), (12), (13). (14) & (15). 5. DiBtrict Vill- 6. District X. 7. Company CirclesII, III, VII, X, XII, ^III,

XIV arC XV.

8. Special Circles III,IV, V, IX ard X. 9. Foreign Section. 10, Estate Duty-cum-Inccme-iEn Ciitlc. 11. Salary Circles. 12. Private Salary Circles.

Tiis Notification shall take effect from the 1st September, 1969.

[No . 116 (F.No. 55f243/69-IT(,AI)]

L. N. GUPTA, Under Secy.

PRINTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER., GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS, 1CNT0 ROAD,

NEW DELHI AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANAGER OF PUBLICATIONS, DELHI, 1 0 60