Subject NOT available

click here for IIIF manifest

REGISTERED No. D. 221

The Gazette of India

EXTRAORDINARY

PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

No. 209] NEW DELHI, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1973/BHADRA 19,1895

Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed

as a separate compilation.

DELIMITATION COMMISSION, INDIA

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 10th September 1973

S.O. 4?8(E).—In pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 9 of the Delimitation Act, 1972, and in continuation of its Notification No. 282/UP/73.

dated 24th August, 1973, published in the Gazette of India and in the State Gazette on 3rd September, 1973, containing proposals for the delimitation of parliamentary and assembly constituencies in Uttar Pradesh, together with the dissenting pro- posals received from the Associate Members, the Delimitation Commission hereby

(1643 )

publishes the further dissenting propost

ils received I

>y it fro

m the Associate Members:—

DISS

SENTING

PROPOSALS

1 6 4 4

In continuation of t

he letter of Shri Shivanand

ivfautiyal, MLA, published in the Gazette on 3-9-7

3-

DISTRICT—ALIGARH

FIRST PROP 3SAL O

RAO

3 7 1 — G a n g i ri Sikandra Rao Tahsil (Part)

5=225 5=525 21,546

718 358 3=623

T H E 370—Sikandra R ao Sikandra Rao Tahsil (Part) Sikandra, Rao Municipality . Purdilnagar T.A. Sikandra Rao Pargana . . .. Hasayan T .A A k r a b ad P a r g a na . . .. L.Cs. i..—Gangrol 2.—BistoliJ

17=253 6,441 i>73>3i3 2,863 10,138 4=345 5=793 2,10,013

3=212 r=5*2 41,692 338 2,223 701 1,522 48,977 23-32%

2,404 4=587 5,855 5=196 3,504

286 1,026 955 325 531

G A Z E T T E

P i l k h a na T .A K a u r i a g a nj T . A. A k b r a b ad P a r g a na . . . .. 14—Pilkhana 1 5 — K a u r i a g a nj 1 6 — S h a h g a rh 1 7 — H a s o na J a g m o h a n p ur . . .. 1 8 — K a s i m p ur 19—Bhagosa Atrauli Tahsil (Part) C h h a r ra T .A G a n g i ri P a r g a na . . . ..

5.507 1,73=194

455 32,767

O F

I

2,io,997

N D

SEC

37=92i 17-97%

OND PROPOSAL

I

A

iing Circle

(After exchu

5,222 5>525 27,619 6,073

718 358 S>484 1,861

17,253 6,441 1=733313 2,863

E X T R A O R D

3,212 1,512 41,693 338

I 370—Sikan ' ra Rao Sikandra Rao Tahsil (Part) Sikandra Rao Municipality Purdilnagar T.A. Sikandra Rao Pargana . . .. Hasayan T.A. Akrabad Pargana L.Cs. 11—Dabha

12—Hasona Jagmohanpur • .

849 955 J

N A R Y

2,404 4=587 4=838

4=913 5=855 2,10,638

48=556 23-14%

5=196 3=504

'286 1,026 905 825 531

I

[

12 Tuamai) 371—Gangiri Sikandra Rao Tahsil (Part) Pilkhana T.A Kauriangani T.A Akr, -b id Pargana 13—Jiroli H i ra S i n gh . . .. 14—Pilkhana 15—Kauriaganj [6 S h a h g a rh . . . . .. C7—Tuamai ( T h i r a m ai w r o n g ly t y p e d) 1 8 — K a s i m p ur "'. ' 19—Bhagosa Atrauli Tahsil (Part) Chharra T.A. Gangiri Pargana

455 32,767

5=507 1=73=194

P A R T

2,16,053

I I

39,732 18-27%

—

THIRD PROPOSAL

S e c

.

369.—Scorn (SO) Hathras Tahsii (Part)

3

(

1 1

) ]

6,873 6^31 1.30,021

i^>37 2,146 ?M54

Sasni TA Mandu T.A. Hathras Parana . . . . (Ex. L.Cs. 1 to 3, 26 27, 28, 32, 33 and 35 to 41

Sikandtz Rod Sikandra Rao TahsU {Part) Sikandra R20 Municipality Purdilnagar T.A. Sikandra Rao Paigana . . .. Haaayan T.A. Hathras Pargdna . . . .. L. C s. 2 6 — M a ho

2 7 — B a r w a na . 2 8 — M e w a li 1 . . ..

Sikandra Rao TahsU {Part) Bijaigarh T.A. Akrabad Pargana . ..

17,253 6041 1,73,313 2,863 13,934 4,084 6=033 3,8i7

5,869 57651

T H E

3,212 1,512 41.692 333 2,547 738 1,156 653

G A Z E T T E

O F

I

N D

I

A

1. G a n g r ol 2. B i s t o li 3. S u h a w a li 4. B i j a i g a ih 5. B a t h e da 6. K a t h e ra 7. N a n an . . . . .. 8. L a d h a ua 9- G o pi 10. M a n ai 11. D a b ha 12. T n a m ai . . . . .. 13. G i r o li H i ra S i n gh . . ..

1,252 n,773 701 1,522 1,178 306 921 989 iyU3 1,109 884 966 849 905 1,861

4,345 5,793 5^19 2,584 3,366 3,922 6,767 5,685 4,356 4^63 4,913 4,838 6,073

2,12,722

57,522 27-04%

E X T R A O R D

I

N A R Y

SHIVANAND NAUTTYAL, M.L.A., S. C. PIDARA, MJ-A., Associate M"ab"s, DeHmitation Commission.

1 6 4 5

DISTRICT BIJNOR

Constituency No. 17, SHEOHARA which has a lower percentage of S. C. population should not be reserved. The percentage is as follows ;—

(1) Nigina (2) Najibabad (3) Bijnor (4) Afajalgarh (5) Dhampur (6) Sheohara (7) Chandpur

24^63 21-38 20-61 20'33 18-80 18-66 17-74

It would thus be clear that Sheohara is at Sixth place. It is proposed that the two constitu- encies having the highest percentage of S. C, may be reserved. Sheohara was a reserved seat from 1952 to 1966 delimitation. Hence, it should not be reserved again when it has a leaser per- centage of S. C.

Amendment Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

SL

Extent

I No. and Name of Constituency

'opulation

55 Kabar, U.P. Assembly

Constituency, Distt. Bareilly.

Following Lckhpal CircleB of Kabar Pargana of Tehsil Bahen which are proposed to be Included in 55—Kabar Assembly Constitutency should remain in 56—Baherl U. P. Assembly Constituency Kabar—Pargana, Tehsil Baherl:—

Population Lefchpal Name of Circle

Circle No.

1,761

3,534 3,7*3 2,783 2,958 1,616 3,270

3 Jua Jawaharpur (Part) 5 Bargawan 7 Mawaikalan . . . . . .. TI Rajoo Nagala (Part) 12 Shahpur (Part) 14 Bakauli 15 Itua Dhura

TOTAL .

18,635

Following Lekhpal Circles of Richa Pargana, Tehsil Baheri which are proposed to be includec [ in 56—Behari Constituency should remain in 55_Kabar Constitutency:—

Population Lekhpal Name of Circle

Circle No.

55i 2,802 3.706 3,338

3,452 5,387 3,534 3,689

1 Ghatgaon 2 Biondha 3 Bajdharan 4 Rahpura Ghanshyam . 5 Pakhurai 6 Deorania (Part) , 7 Semikhera (Part) 8 Itua (Part)

TOTAL

26,449

Grounds for making alternate proposals

Most of the Lekhpal Circles of Kabar Pargana in Tehsll Baheri are across the Kicha River which has no approach Bridge over it. The only bridge is via Baheri which is fai off from thin area. 55 Kabar Assembly constituency starts from Sirauli Pargana In Aonla Tehsil and is stretched as long as 40 miles. After inclusion of above Lekhpal Circles of Kabar Pargana, 55 Kabar constituency will become more longer.

Moreover, Lekhpal Circles of Kabar Pargana which are proposed to be included in 55 Kabai Constituency are very far away from this area and nearer to Baheri. Contrary to it Lakhpal Circles of Iticha Pargana, Tehsll Baheri which are proposed to be deleted from 55 Kabar Constituency are very near tq this area and as far as 15 miles from Baheri Municipality.

At present 55 Kabar Constituency consists of 3 blocks and if proposed changes are effected 4 Blocks will be combined (Fatehganj, MeerganJ, Shergarh and Baheri) in this Constituency resulting an increase of area and hlnderances to development work.

If existing boundries of both the Constituencies (55 Kabar ard 56 Baheri) as mentioned above are net disturbed the population will almost equalised and shall be about E Lacs each.

Amendment and Suggestions

Alternate Proposal

Extent

Population s. No. and name

of constituency

Tilhar .

ijiSo

26,837

Tilhar Tehsil (Part) Tilhar (M) . .. Tilhar Pargana exclusive LCs.

No. 1 to 3 .

73,856

12,709

6i3273

9,975 Khera Bajhera Pargana Jalalabad Tehsil (Part) Jalalabad Pargana L. Cs. No.

1 to 3, 10 to 15, 25, 26, 28, 44 & 45

43,485

7,729

207,451

31)593

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Extent

Population

si. No. and name of Constituency

. Jalalabad Town & Area

Jalalabad .

64

Jalalabad Pargana

11,101

1,99,170

706 25,002

(Exclusive LCs, No. 1 to 3 10 to 15, 25, 26, 28, 44J & 45)

2,10,271

25,708

Grounds for making alternate proposals

Lekhpal circles • No. 4, 9, 16 should be included in Assembly Constituency Jalalabad No. 64 as these circles lay deep Inside the area covered by Jalalabad Constituency and these are situated on the other side of the river Ramganga where no circle included in Tilhar Constituency No. 63 is situated.

Lekhpal circles of Pargana Jalalabad No. 28, 44, 45 should be excluded from 64. Jalalabad Assembly Constituency and these circles should be included iH>63 Tilhar Assembly Constituency. As these circle are attached with the Constituency and no river or anything Is obstruction.

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Extent

Population s 1. No. and Name of the of Constituency 1

Lekhpal circle No. 6 Harbatpur ix\, Pargana

Bilgram Distt. Hardoi

90

Bilgram may please bo taken out from Constituency No. 90 and added to 91 and Lekhpal Circle No. 16 Jarauli Kalan is to bo retainod in 90 in Bilgram Constituency,

•ounds for making Alter-

Gi

nate proposals

P. S. Lekhpal Circle No. 16 Jarauli Kalan is placet^ In Constituency No. 91 when it should be in 90 because all other circles •which aurround it are in 90.

Lekhpal Circlo No. 5 and 7 of pargana Bilgram havo been taken out and added to 91, Circle No. 6, thereforj falls in between 5 and 7- Hence it should bo added to 91. At firet it was in 90. In case it is not done, the candidate of 90 will have to cross 91 in reaching 90.

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Extent

No. and Name of Con-

Population si.:

stituency

To

The Chairman Delimitation Commission New Ddhi.

Jalalpur Town Area, Surhurpur Pargana, 2, IS, 394 General 56 Jalalpur

131

Akbarpur Pargana Lekhpal Circles

541 Schedule.

54 Dhaurua, 55 Bhusauli, 56 Khalispur Bhatauli 58 Tahapur, 59 Kalepur Mahval, 61 Barepur, 62 Kachpura.

1. That the old constituency Is named 131 Jalalabad, Fatzabnd. 2. That the constituency is a General Constituency. 3. That this consists of the following units:-'

(a) Jalalpur town Area.

(b) Surhurpur, Pargana, excluding 3 villages—Kahra, Katvi, Sulempur.

(c) Lekhpal Circle, Tahapur. (d) Lekhpal Circle Khalispur Bhatauli, (e) Lekhpal Circle Kachpura. (f) Lekhpal Circle Barepur, (g) Lekhpal Circle Astabad, (h) Lekhpal Circle Sammanpur.

That the General elections of 19G7 and 1969 were held on the basis of the territorial limit mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

4. That the proposals of the Commission about the delimitation of this consti- tuency are as under: —

Jalalpur Town Area, Surhurpur Pargana, Lekhp-al Circle 54, Dhaurua, Lekhpal Circle 55, Bhusaull, Lekhpal Circle 56, Khalispur Bhitaull, Lekhpal Circle 58, Kahapur, Lekhpal Circle 59, Kalepur Mahual, Lekhpal Circle 61, Barepur, Lekhpal Circle 62, Kachpura.

5. That the total population of this area is 2,15,394+58,541 (Scheduled Caste) according to the last census.

Amendment and Suffgeition

Alternate Proposal

Extent

tST<*. and N a me of Cons-

Population si.:

• titueqey

Fsk '-arpur

Pargana Fakharpur ~

147

(Including Lekhpal Circles 6, 7, 10 to 17

3"4U

Pargana Hisampur

(Excluding Lekhpal Circles 1 to 8)

33941 212305

Total of the constituency

Grounds for making alternate proposals.

More Geographical compactness and communication facilities will come hy the addition and extraction by the proposed amendments. These additions and extraction are essential by the natural flaws (Rivers).

Amendment for 148 Constituency^

& Name of tho Consti-

No.

Extent

Population^ tuency

Mfthrl

148

Kaisarganj Tehsil (Part) Pargana Fakharpur

LCs T to 5, 8, 9, 18, 19

46324 Nanpara Tehsil (Part) Nan para Pargana LCs 12 to 16, 26 to 31 j 38 to 47, 59 to 63 & 72 to 74)

Bahraich Pargana

Bahralch Pargana (Part) LCs r to 5

79201 I⁸975 Pargana Dharamapur LCs No. 10 & 11

212639

Grounds foi alternative proposals: —

(1) This constituency contains rivers like Ghaghra, Saryu, Landor and canals also which are a problem lor communication'. Hence LCs proposed above should be retained in this constituency.

(2) LCs 12 to 16 and 27 of Pargana Nanpara fall adjacent to the LCs proposed on the West of river Saryu. Blndes LCs 10 to 11 of Pargana Dharmpur fall on the same load and are surrounded by rivers and canals but having direct contacts. This constituency which justifies their inclusion in the Constituency.

Amendments and Suggestion

Alternate proposal

>Jo. and Name of Cons-

Extent

SI.]

Population tituency

149 Nanpara

Nanpara TeMl (Part)

Pargana Dharampur

(Excluding Lckhpal Circles io to n)

Nanpara N. A.

Total S.C. 18732 1021

Nanpara Pargana

(Excluding Lekhpal circles 38 to 83, and including Lekhpal circles 48 to 50)

142953 24467

Pargana Chanda.

14648 4325

(Including Lckhpal circles 13,14,

19 to 21

213679 29813

Grounds for makina Alternate Provosals: —

By the above mentioned inclusion—

1. The problem of Rivers, Main Roads etc. will be solvpd. 2. The constituencies of Mehsi Fakarpur, Behraich and Charda will be geographically more compact and easy in view of communication etc. 8, The constituencies will become compact and problem of River Suryu, Ghaghra, Gandor, Budanwa etc. will be solved.

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Population

Extent

si.:

No. and Name of Constituency

Par/zana Bahraich

Charda.

150

(including Lekhpal circles 7, 8, 9, 13, 17, 24 and 25)

Pargana Charda

(including Lckhpal circles 13, 14, 19, 20 and 21).

Nanpara Pargana

(including Lckhpal circles 51, 52, 53, 64 to 7ij 75 to 83)

TOTAL 216191

Grounds for making Alternate Proposals

By the inclusion and exclusion of above mentioned Lekhpal circles the consti- tuency will become geographically more compact and easy for transportation purpose.

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Extent

No. and Name of

Population si.:

Constituency

Bahraich.

Bahraich Tehsil (Part).

152

Bahraich (M)

73931 3139

Bahraich Pargana. (Excluding Lekhpal circles 1 to 5,44 to 49, 56

to 69, 7 to 9,13 to 17, 24 and 25).

Pargana Hixampur. (Including Lekhpel circles 1 to 8),

TOTAL .

216610

Grands for making Alternate Proposals

By excluding and Including as mentioned above the constituency will become more compact.

A m e n d m e nt and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

SI. No. and Name of

Extent.

Constituency

Population. (1971 Census)

Khajuha (District

285

Bindki tehsil (Part) Tappajar Pargana . . ..

Fatehpur)

80,463

Kora Pargana, Rural (excluding Lekhpal

Circles 33 & 34 and 37 to 45)

1,15,986 1,96,449

Grounds for making Alternate Proposals

The new constituency No. 285 Khajuha, as carved out by the Delimitation Committee, makes the following changes in the constituency as it stands today.

(1) It has from Kora Pargana excluded Lekhpal Circles 25, 31 and 32 more and added to It Kora Jahanabad Town Area and Lekhpal Circles 40, 41 and 45 which were not included In the old constituency. By making these changes the consti- tuency Is given a population of 1,90,272. The alternate proposal gives the new constituency a population of 1,96,449 by adding only two more lakhpal circles i.e. 35 and 36. This is a much simpler and appropriate way oi making up the deficiency of population.

(2) The proposal of the Committee suffers from the following further defects: — (a) It takes out lekhpal circle 25 which is almost ir the middle of the

constituency.

(b) It further takes out lekhpal circles 31 and 32 i.e. Jaraul and Lakhna- khera. Lakhnakhera is the same as Khajuha. Thus the proposal of the Committee takes out a very group of the villages by which name the constituency itself Is known.

(c) The constituency as it stands today i.e. the old constituency, consisted of two blocks—Amaull and Khajuha. Amauli is allowed to remain Intact by the new proposal. But It splits Khajuha and takeH out of it only two lekhpal circles i.e. 31 and 32, which are the headquarters of the block. The result will be that the entire block will be cut off from Its headquarters and the developmental work will consequently suffer. The strong point of the alternate proposal is it keeps both the tolocks intact and observes the new basis of delimitation also I.e. the lekhpal circles.

(3) It is difficult to comprehend the reasons for which the Committee my have proposed the changes in the old constituency except probably that lekhpal circles 25, 31 and 32 are situated on the other side of the Rindh river. But they have lost sight of the fact that the whole Pargana of Tappajar lies on both aides of the above river which is included in the constituency

Alternate proposal

Extent

i l.

Population No. & Name oT' Constituency

. Akbarpur T. A

Sarvankhert .

297

7692 5029

Rura T. A Tchsil Akbarpur—excluding lckhpal circles

1 to 3 & S to 24. . . .. L I95>92<5

208,647

TOTAL .

. Tehsil Bilhaur lekhyal circles 49 to 88

298

139,010 Chaubepur

Tehsil Akbarpur—Jekhpal circles 1 to 3 and

8 to 24.

69514

T O T AL .

208,524

Grounds for making alternative proposals

(1) That there is a difference of above 12,000 in the population of constituencies

No. 297 and 298, which is apparently without any basis and propriety. This difference can be almost equalised by slight interchange in the Lekhpal Circles of Constituencies concerned as proposed above.

(2) Thai the alternative proposal has been made keeping in view the cempact- n'ess, geographical conditions and approachability of both the constituencies in question.

(3) That the proposed change does not materially affect the scheduled caste

population of the constituencies concerned.

(4) That the proposed change is to take place in the boundary limits of one and

the same tehsil.

Amendment and Suggestion

Alternate Proposal

Population

Extent

SI. No. & Name of N. Constituency

. Atorra M. B. . Naraini T. A

Banda 320 Naraini J

17,231 4=256 61,81,619 Naraini Pargana

. (Ex. L. Cs 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29,

In Draft Proposal .

2,03,106

32, & 35 to 38)

Proposed Arrangement to be amended

. Atrra M. B. . Naraini T. A

Banda 320 Naraiai -

+ 17,231 +4.256 1,71,641 —9,925 Naraini Pargana + (Ex. L. Cs. 19,32,35,24, & Including L.Cs. 23, 31, 21, 26, 34, 10 from proposed constituency No. 319—Banda) . + 20,003

1,93,128

Ground for making Alternate proposals : —•

The new proposal is motivated because oj; Geographical factors cultural affinity, cotiguty, compactness and transport facilities. If the proposal is accepted the constituency No. 319 Banda and constituency No. 320 Naraini will be more com- pact, culturally sound and geographically even. It will also almost equalise the population and 'will slightly alfect the present proposal as only two I.ekhpal Circles will be altered.

It is known that the constituency No. 315 is of 1,86,353 population and No. 316 Is of 185, 383 population and 318 is of 1,98,358 population. So there is no difference in all.

SHIVANAND NAUTIYAL, MLA. Associate Member, Delimitation Commission.

1st. Alternate—Proposal

Population

Extent

SI. No. asd Name of

Constituency

225 Bansdih .

Lekhpal—Circles (1) 17 to 20, 22, 28 to 39 & 43 to 69 in Par-

gana Kharid

11,617

(2) Notified Area-~Reotee

(3) Town—Area—Bansdih

(4) Town—Area—Sahatwor

10,773 10,633

1,87,094

TOTAL .

Ground for making Alternate Proposals

The constituency No. 225-Bansdih-east should be kept as previous due to following reasons:—••

This constituency contains two development blocks namely Bansdih and Reotee. These are the only two blocks which are selected for special- experimental rural employment programme (Pilot-Scheme) of Gov- ernment of India, from entire Uttar Pradesh. This area ia selected for Pilot-Scheme to solve the un-employment of agricultural and landless labourers. For proper implementation of this programme, the entire area of these two blocks should be kept In one constituency as previous.

According to the election-commission suggestion, the entire area -will be divided in two constituencies which will dairutte the aim of the Experimental Pilot-Scheme of Government Of India.

So, once again I suggest to keep this constituency as previous, which Is also comfortable for easy transportation.

2n.ii Alternate—Proposal (If change is essential:)

If any how changes in above proposal i.e. previous constituency is essential, the following suggestions should be followed. The Geographical and road trans- port-conditions are also comfortable for the following suggestions:—

Population

Extent

SI. No. and Name of

Constituency.

225—Bansdih

87,669 . (1) Tahsil-Banadih part Pargana-Kharid . \ Lckhpal circles 30, 32,45,46,48 to 69 . J

T 1,670 TO,633 91,221 (2) Notified Area-Reotee . . .. (3) Town Area—Sahatwar (4) Tahsil—Ballia—part-pargana-Ballia Lekhpal-Circles 20 to 25, 29, 33 to 34.

TOTAL .

2,01,193:

SARJOO PANDEY, M. P. Associate Member, Delimination Commission,,

LUCKNOW DISTRICT—ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY 10] LUCKNOW EAST:.

101. Lucknow East

11. Bashiratganj Ward be replaced by 2 Hazratganj Ward.

Reasons:

Existing constituency need not be disturbed because It is more compact.

103 Lucknow Central:

24 Kashmiri Mohalla Ward be replaced by 11, Bashiratganj Ward.

Reasons:

(1) This suggestion is consequential t0 that proposed for 101 Lucknow east. (2) 11, Baahiratganj already is a part of the existing constituency.

102 Lucknow West:

2. Hazratganj Ward be replaced by 24, Kashmiri Mohalln Ward.

Reasons:

(1) It makes the constituency more compact. (2) 24, Kashmiri Mohalla Ward already is a part of the existing constituency. The proposals of delimitation of constituencies of U.P. Legislative Assembly have been published against which the following objection is submitted against the proposed delimitation of constituencies No. 83 Beniganj, No. 84 Sandila and No. 85 Ahirori of Harodi district.

1. According to clause (c) of Section 9(1) of the said Act, the Schedule caste constituencies to be determined on the basis of population but in the proposed ripllnUtaTif.n this rennirpment. Vinn hppn lOTinrpri nD irivttn hr-lnur

Total Schedule Caste percentage

I.

4 5 - 82

2.

3 8 - 67 No. 85 Ahirori No. 86 Hardoi No. 87 Bawan

N o. 83 B e n i g a nj . . ..

3 S - I5 3 6 - 66

N o. 88 P i h a ni

3 4 - 23

N o. 89 S h a h a b ad . . ..

3- 4- 5- 6.

1 7 - 96

N o. 84 S a n d i la

N o. 90 B i l g r am . . . ..

7- 8.

N o. 91 M a l l a w an . . ..

35-35 19-77 2T-99 9-

The first 3 i.e. Ahirori Hardoi and Rewan have the largest percentage of popu- lation of schedule caste and so only the said constituencies can be reserved for them but the proposals are otherwise,

(2) That Sec. 9(1)(a) of the Delimitation Commission Act 1962 requires that in delimiting the constituencies regard shall be had for

(I) compactness: of area (ii) Physical features (iii) Facilities of communication and public conveyance.

(3) Constituency No. 84 as proposed is situated on either sides of River Beta and as such the river effects the compactness of constituency as well as the means of communication as well as public convenience and needs change. Annexure-A is attached herewith.

(4) The constituency No. 84 is about 55 kilometer in length from east to west. This length can be reduced by excluding Lekhpal circle No. 1 and 2 of Pargana Sandiln and including Lekhpal circle No. 38 and 39 of the same Pargana which will reduce the length by about 15 k.m. The adjustment is given in the attached Annexure-A,

It is therefore requested that the proposed delimitation of constituencies and the constituencies reserved for scheduled caste be revised and No, 83 Beniganj constituency be made general.

(1) 14 Khatima be replaced by 12 Ranlkhet, Because there Is no easy approach from Nainital to Khatima,

(2) and 12 Ranikhet ia adjacent to Nainital and is a constituent in the existing Nainital Lok Sabha.

7—Maradabad

27 Gangeshwarl and 28 Sambhal both be replaced bv 30 Chandausl and 31 Kundarki. Both Chandausl and Kundarki arc parts of the existing L.S. Morada- bad.

Sh -Chandausi

(Now to be named as Sambhal) 30 Chanduast and 31 Kundarki be replaced by 28 Sambhal and 27 Gangeshwari.

Reasons:

The area constituting Gangeshwarl and Sambhal Is also contiguous to 40 Bisaull and 41 Gunnaur of Badaun District.

10—Badaun

347 Kasguni be replaced by 344 Patiyali. (1) The present L.S. Kasgur.j should not be abolished. (2) In the existing Kasgunj L,S. Constituency 45 Usehat of Badaun District Is contiguous to 344 Patiyali.

49—Saidpu/r (District Jaunpur)

252 Kerakat and 253 Dayalsi of Jaunpur District be replaced by 216 Mehnagar and 217 Lalganj of Azamgarh District,

Reasons:

(1) 46 Lalganj S.C. is contiguous to 49 Saidpur S.C. (2) By the proposed amendment the constituency becomes more compact.

66—Etawah

301 Auraiya be replaced by 306 Bharthana.

Reasons:

Barthana is nearer to Etawath and its inclusion will make the constituency most compact.

67-—Kannauj

306 Bharthana be replaced by 301 Auraiya.

Reasons:

This suggestion is consequential to the proposed amendment Is 66 Etawah,

71—Eta h

344 Patiyali be replaced by 347 KasRunj.

Reasons:

(1) This will make the constituency more compact (2) That amendment is consequential to that proposed in 10 Badaun.

77—Khurja

380 DIbye be replaced by 385 Shikarpur,

Reasons:

This suggestion is consequential to that made for 78 Bulandshahr.

78—Bullandshahr

78 Bulahdshahr 385 Shikarpur be replaced by 380 Dibye.

Reasons;

The exiting constituencies 78 Bulandshahr and 77 Khurja need not be disturbed.

MADHAV PRASAD TR.IPATHI,

Associate Member MLA, Delimitation Commission.

ANNEXURE A

To be included

To be excluded

Beniganj

83

Lekhpal Circle Parg, Sandila

L.Cs. Parg. Sandila 38 and 39

1 and 2

84-

—Sandila J

L.'Cs. Parg.JSandila 14 Parg. Balaman 4

L.Cs.^Parg.^Sandila 38 and 39

AHrori

"5

Parg. Sandila L. C. 1 and 1

Parg. Sandila 14 Balamau 4

The result of population will be as follows:—

Beniganj

83

Total Pop. 197276

C. Percentage of S. C.

68577 34 -7% 84 Sandila

198263

72799 36-6%

Ahirori

85

196806

91877 45%

[No. 282/UP/73]

By Order,

P. L JACOB, Secy.