The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART I—Section 1
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 24] NEW DELHI, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 198 2 /MAGHA 19, 1903
Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate
compilation
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART I—SEC. 1] 124other transport service [or the carriage of passengers or goods by land or water ;
(iiil any service connected with the operation or main- tenance of aerodromes, or with the operation, repair or maintenance of aircraft, or any service in the InLeinational Airports Authority of India constituted under section 3 of the International Airports Autho- rity Act, 1971, (43 of 1971) ;
(iv) any service in, or in connection with the woiking of any major port, including any service connc.tcd with, the loading, unloading, movement or storagi of goods in any such port ;
(v) any "service connected with the clearance of goods or passengers through the customs or with the prevention of smuggling ;
(vi) any service in any establishment of, or connected wiih. the armed forces of the Union or in any other establishments or installations connected with defence ;
(vii) any service >n any establishment or undcitak'iig deal- ing with the production of goods requiicd for any purpose connected with defence ;
(viii) any service in any section of any industrial under- taking pertaining to a scheduled industry on the working of which the safety of such undertaking u? the employees employed therein depends,
Explanation—For the purposes of this sub-clause, the expressions "industrial undertaking" and "sche- duled industry" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to (hem in clauses (d) and (i) of section 3 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951) ;
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
New Delhi, the 8th February, 1982
No. n/15011/l/82-IS(DOn).~-WhereaH in the judgement in the Writ petitions, namely (1) No. 5724 of 1980, A. K. Roy VS. Union of India and A&R, (2) No. 5874 of 1980, Thau Singh Typgi Vs. Union of India and A&R and (3) No. 5433 of 1980, Dr. Vasam Kumar Pandit Vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court has held that no person can be detained under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (65 of 1980>, with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community unless by a luw or notification made or published fairly in advance the supplies and services, the maintenance of which is regarded as essential to the community and in respect of which the order of detention is proposed to be passed, are made known appropriately to the public ;
Now, therefore, for the purposes of detention under sub- setion (?) of section 3 of tile National Security Act, 1980 (65 of 19R0I, the Central Government notifies the following supplies anil services as supplies and services essential to the community, namely :—
(\) Any postal, telegraph or telephone service, including any service connected therewith ; •
(i") any railway service or any transport service for the carriage of passengers or goods by air or any (ix) any service in, or in connection with, the working of any undertaking being an undertaking engaged in the purchase, procurement, storage, supply or distribution of foodgrains ;
fsij any service in connection with or in relation to Anting ;
to") any service in any establishment or undertaking deal- ing with the production, snpplv or distribution of coal, power, steel or fertilizers ;
{xiii) any service in any oilfield or refinery o;- in any establishment or undertaking dealing with the pro- duction, supply or distribution of petroleum anil petroleum products ;
(xfv) any service in any mint or security prevs ;
fxv) any service in connection with elections to Parliament Or to the LegisTntores of the Spates ;
ftvi) any service in connection with the affairs of the- Unfon, or a State not being a service specified in arty of the foregoing categones.
G. S. GREWAL, It. Secy,