The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART II—Section 3 —Sub-section (ii)
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 238] NEW DELHI, TUESDAY, MAY 31,1983/JYAISTHA 10,1905 Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. (3i)] MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY (Department of Industrial Development)ORDER
New Delhi, the 31st May, 1983
S.O. 384(E)]X8A|H>RA|83.—Whereas by the Order of the Government of India in the Ministry of Industry (Department of Industrial Development) No. S.O. 157(E)/18A/IDRA/79, dated the 27th March, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the said Order), the management of the Industrial Undertakings known as Messrs. Lily Biscuit Company (Private) Limited and Messrs. Lily Barley Mills (Private) Limited, both located at Calcutta, had been taken over for a period of three years with effect from the 27th March, 1979 and the Secretary to the Government of West Bengal in the Department of Sick and Closed Industries, now known as Department of Industrial Reconstruction, Calcutta, was appointed as "Authorised Controller";
expiry of the period of three years aforesaid, had issu- ed directions from time to time, for such continuance for a further period upto and inclusive of the 31st May 1983 (vide Order of the Government of India in the Ministry of Industry (Department of Industrial Deve- lopment) No. S.O. 178(E)|18A|IDRA]82 dated the 26th March, 1982 and S.O. 688(E)|18A|IDRA|82 dated the 25th September, 1982);
And, whereas, the Central Government is of the opinion that it is1 expedient in the public interest that the said Order should coninue to have effect for a further period upto and inclusive of the 31st December, 1983;
- Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 o 1951), the Central Government hereby directs that the said Order dated the 27th March, 1979 shall continue to have effect for a further period upto and inclusive of the 31st December. 1983. And, whereas, the Central Government being of opinion that it is expedient in the public interest that the said Order should continue to have effect after the [F. No. 2(3)/81-CUS] A. P. SARWAN, Jt. Secy ↩