The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 74] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1984/PHALGUNA 6, 1905 Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEc.3(ii)]MIN1STTRY OF LABOUR & REHABILITATION
(Department of Labour)
NLW Delhi, the 20th February, 1984
ORDER
S.O. 116(E).—Whereas the Central Government is of the opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the em- ployers In relation to the Indian Farmers Fertilizer Coopera- tive Ltd., and their workmen in respect of the matters speci- fitd in the Schedule hereto annexed;
And whereas the said dispute involves a Question of national importance and is also of such a nature that indus- trial establishments of the Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co- operative Ltd., situated in more than one State arc likely to be interested in, or affected by, such dispute;
And whereas the Central Government is of opinion that the said dispute should be adjudicated by National Tribunal;
(if) In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1A) of Section 10 of the said Act, hereby refers the said industrial dispute to the said National Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.
SCHEDULE
1. Whether the wages, pav scale? and rates of incre- ment of workers of IFFCO should be revised ? If, eo. from what date and with what details 7
2. Whether the existinK rate^ of Dearness Allowance should be revised ? If so. from what date and with what details 7
3. Whether existing rate of Washing Allowance should be revised? If t,o, from what date and with what details 7
4. Whether Leave Travel Concession should be revis- ed ? If so, from what date and what other details ?
5. Whether the existing rate of House Rent Allowance should be revised? and whether the rate of deduc- tion of House Rent in the case of workers living in houses provided by JFFCO should be revised ? If so, from what date and with what details ?
6. Whether the rate of City Compensatory Allowance should be revised ? If so, from what dale and with what details ?
7. Whether workers handling cash should be paid cash Handling Allowance 7 If so. from what date and with what details 7
8. Whether shift allowance should be revised? If so, from what date and with what details?
9. Whether Conveyance Allowance should be rtviseJ ? If so, from what date and with what details 7
10. Whether workers performing jobs of other grades should be paid acting allowance in addition to their own grade pay 7 If yes, from what date and with what details 7
11. Whethtr there should be any change In the number of days of earned leave, sick leave, casual leave and paid holidays to which a worker is entitled ? If so, the details thereof,
12. Whether the workers are entitled for short leave 7 If so, the details thereof.
13. Whether workers should get their annual increments beyond the maximum r>f their scale of pay 7 If so, from what date and with what details?
14. Whether the workers should be allowed reimburse- ment of medical expenses incurred on their brothers and sisters 7 If so, the details thereof.
15. Whether the existing rate of Contributory Provident Fund should be revised ? If so, from what date and with what details ?
16. Whether the job classification of each workman should be done in consultation with, the Union 7
17. Whether the retirement age of workers should '•.. increased to 60 years? Whether a, retirement scheme should be formulated in consultation with the Union,
18. Whether the House Building Loan Scheme should be formulated in consultation with the Union ?