The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 261] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, JUNE 2, 1984/JYAISTHA 12,1906 Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY (PART II—SEC. 3(U])Bangalore, Nasik, and Barrackpore; (iv) Indian Telephone Industries Ltd., Bangalore and (v) Bharat Electronics Ltd., Bangalore situated in more than one State are likely to be interested in or affected by such disputes.
And whereas the Central Government is of opi- nion that the said dispute should be adjudicated by National Tribunal.
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
(Department of Labour)
New Delhi, the 30th May, 1984.
ORDER
S.O. 412(E):—Whereas the Central Govern- ment is of ppioion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to (1) Hindustan •Machine Tools Ltd., Bangalore, (iij Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., Bangalore and Kolar Gold Fields, (iii) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.. Bangalore, Nasik and Barrackpore; (iv) Indian Telephone Industries Ltd., Bangalore and(v') Bharat Electro- nics Ltd., Bangalore and their workmen respec- tively in respect of the matters, specified in the Schedule hereto annexed.
Now, thehrefore, the Central Government :—-
(i) in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7B ot tiie Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), hereby con- stitutes a National Industrial Tribunal with Headquarters at Bombay and appoints Justice Shri R.D.Tulpule as its Presiding Officer; and
(ii) in exercise of the powers conferred by sttb-section (IA) of section 10 of the said Act, hereby refers the said indus- trial dispute (s) to the said National Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.
SCHEDULE
1. Are the workmen justified in demanding revision of wages bringing their wages on par with BHEL in view of the rele- vant clauses in the 1978 settlement?
2. If so, what should be the quantum and. the period for which such quantum is to be paid in view of the BHEL settle- ment subsisting till the end of August 1982?
3. Are the workmen of Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd., Bangalore, (ii) Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., Bangalore and Kolar Gold Fields, (iii) Indian Telephone Indus- tries, Bangalore, (iv) Bharat Electronics Ltd., Bangalore and (v) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Bangalore justified in going on strike w.e.f. 2642-80? IF so, to what relief are the workmen entitled?
4. Are the managements of (i) Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd., Bangalore; (ii) Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., Bangalore and Kolar Gold Fields; (iii) Indian Telephone Industries, Bangalore, (iv) Bharat Electronics Ltd., Bcmgaiode and (v) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., Banga- lore justified in declaring lockouts of their establishments with efTect from 8|9-5-81 to 4-6-81 at Kolar Gold Fields and 7-5-81 to 2]3-6-81 at Bangalore? If not, are the workmen entitled to v/necs for the lockout period or to any other relief?