Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 214, 18 January 2012

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शिमला, बुधवार 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th June, 2011

No. 11-2/95(Lab) I.D/2011-Kinnaur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Padma Youdon W/O Shri Tanzin Dorje R/O Village & P.O. Kaza, Tehsil Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

214-राजपत्र/2012-18-1-2012 (5167)5168 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Smt. Padma Youdon W/O Shri Tanzin Dorje daily wage worker by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Kaza, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. w.e.f. 01-11-2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to her have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENTDEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 21th June, 2011

No. 11-1/86(Lab) I.D/2011-Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Phool Singh R/O House No.-2165/12, Katcha Tank, Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. Vs. The Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, DistrictSirmour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Phool Singh chainman by the Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. w.e.f. Year, 2005 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whereas persons junior to him have been retained by the employer, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 18th August, 2011

No. 11-2/86(Lab) ID/2008/Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Jarnail Singh S/O Sh. Hem Raj, VPO Swail/ Swahan, Tehsil Sh. Naina Devi Ji, Distt. Bilaspsur, H.P V/s The Executive Engineer, HPSEB Division Bilaspur As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Jarnail Singh S/O Sh. Hem Raj, VPO Swail/ Swahan, Tehsil Shri Naina Devi Ji, Distt. Bilaspsur, H.P by The Executive Engineer, HPSEB Division Bilaspur w.e.f. 26.4.1999, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 18th August, 2011

No.11-5/99(Lab)ID/Chamba/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Lachhi Devi W/O Late Sh. Kishan Chand, Village- Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Lachhi Devi W/O Late Sh. Kishan Chand, Village- Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba by Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Killar, Tehsil Pangi w.e.f. October, 2005 and retaining the junior workmen, as alleged by worker, is proper and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the aggrieved workman is entitled ?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

To The Labour Commissioner-cum- Director of Employment, H.P. Shimla-171002.

Subject: Joining Report.

Sir,

In compliance to the Additional Chief Secretary ( Labour & Employment ) to the Govt. of H.P. Shimla Notification No. Shram (B)2-4/2005( Estt.), Dated- 29th August, 2011, I have the honour to submit my joining report for the post of Superintendent Grade-II today on 30.8.2011 ( F.N.). This is for your kind information and further necessary action please.

Yours faithfully, HET RAM. Dated- 30.8.2011. Superintendent Grade-II.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Lal Chand S/O Sh. Prem Chand, Village- Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Lal Chand S/O Sh. Prem Chand, Village-Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan by the i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan ( Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011

No. 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Naginder Chand S/O Sh. Nek Ram, Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Naginder Chand S/O Sh. Nek Ram, Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan ( Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rafic S/O Sh. Ram Nath, Village & Post Office Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Rafic S/O Sh. Ram Nath, Village & Post Office Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan,(Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. ( Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Chattar Singh, Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but5173 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Chattar Singh, Village Gurdaspura, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by the i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan (Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. ( Contractor) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 25th August, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh. Ram Partap, Village- Bada Gpdam, P.O. Kherawali, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Rajesh Kumar S/O Sh. Ram Partap, Village- Bada Gpdam, P.O. Kherawali, Distt. Panchkula, Haryana by i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, ( Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.(Contractor), verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th August, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab) ID/2011/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Kringu Ram, Village Kharota, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s i) The General Manager, M/s GMP Technical Solutions, Village Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. ii) M/s S.S. Engineer, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Kringu Ram, Village Kharota, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan, H.P. by i) The General Manager, M/S GMP Technical Solution, Village- Kurawala, P.O. Mandhala, Distt. Solan (Principal Employer) ii) M/s S.S. Engineers, Near Bus Stand, Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Contractor Company) verbally w.e.f. 05.11.2008 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from above named employers?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th August, 2011

No.11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village Gailla, P.O. Sarol, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/s Executive Engineer, HPPWD ( B&R) Division Chamba ( H.P.)

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village Gailla, P.O. Sarol, Tehsil & Distt. Chamba by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD ( B&R) Division Chamba ( H.P.) w.e.f. 12/2004, while retaining junior workers in service, as alleged by worker, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 12th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Bimla W/O Sh. Mohan Singh, Village Nauni, P.O. Oachghat, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Bimla W/O Sh. Mohan Singh, Village Nauni, P.O. Oachghat, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 29.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly5176 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Chunu Ram, VPO Nauni, District Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5- B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Manoj Kumar S/O Sh. Chunu Ram, VPO Nauni, District Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour (R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for reemployment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Sh. Pritam Singh, Near Congress Bhawan, Saproon, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Sh. Pritam Singh, Near Congress Bhawan, Saproon, Distt. Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector- 6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Palak Ram S/O Sh. Prem Dutt R/O Village Danal, P.O.

Panawa, District Sirmour, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Palak Ram S/O Sh. Prem Dutt R/O Village Danal, P.O. Panawa, District Sirmour, (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector- 6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/Baddi/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Krishan, Village- Delagi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. V/s The Director Operations, M/S Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

1. " Whether termination of the services of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/O Sh. Gopal Krishan, Village- Delagi, P.O. Koti, Tehsil & Distt. Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 31.8.2010 by the Factory Manager/ Occupier M/s Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P after conducting the enquiry, about which above ex-worker has alleged that same was not fair & justified, is proper and justified? if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and relief the above worker is entitled to from above employer/management?"

2. "If issue no. I is answered that inquiry was fair & just, in that case, whether the punishment is proportionate to the misconduct? If not, what relief the above ex- worker is entitled to from the management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 5th October, 2011

No.11-1/85(Lab) ID/2010/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Renu Mehra W/O Late Sh. Dev Raj, Ex-Peon, R/O Old Chari Road Sudhead, Near Sh. C.L. Mehra Niwas, Dharmsala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. V/s The Principal, BD DAV Senior Secondary Public School Kotwali Bazar, Dharamsala, Distt. Kangra (H.P.)

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Renu Mehra W/O late Sh. Dev Raj, Ex-Peon, R/O Old Chari Road Sudhead, Near Sh. C.L. Mehra Niwas, Dharmsala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. as Peon by The Principal, BD DAV Senior Secondary Public School Kotwali Bazar, Dharamsala, Distt. Kangra (H.P.) w.e.f. 26.9.2009, without issuing charge sheet, without conducting enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/Baddi/2011.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Sandeep Kumar S/O Sh. Damodar Dass, Village- Kodhar, P.OP. Chimhanu, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P V/s The Director Operations, M/S Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

1. " Whether termination of the services of Sh. Sandeep Kumar S/O Sh. Damodar Dass, Village- Kodhar, P.OP. Chimhanu, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, Distt. Mandi, (H.P.) w.e.f. 31.8.2010 by the Factory Manager/ Occupier M/s Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Jharmajari, Tehsil Baddi, Distt. Solan, H.P after conducting the enquiry, about which above ex-worker has alleged that same was not fair & justified, is proper and justified? if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and relief the above worker is entitled to from above employer/ management?" 2. "If issue no. I is answered that inquiry was fair & just, in that case, whether the punishment is proportionate to the misconduct? If not, what relief the above ex- worker is entitled to from the management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_______

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Seema W/O Sh, Babloo, R/O Village- Dublu, P.O. Janedghat, District Shimla (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but5181 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Seema W/O Sh, Babloo, R/O Village- Dublu, P.O. Janedghat, District Shimla (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/ Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No.11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Santresh W/O Sh. Dalip, R/O VPO Nauni, District Solan, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry,Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Santresh W/O Sh. Dalip, R/O VPO Nauni, District Solan, (H.P.) w.e.f. 13.10.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for reemployment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to eclare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 12th October, 2011

No.11-1/86(Lab)ID/2011/Nahan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Sukh Dev S/O Late Sh. Munna Ram, R/O Village Kotrdi Kanlog, P.O. Rama, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. V/s i) The Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. ii) The Assistant Conservator of Forest, Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Sh. Sukh Dev S/O late Sh. Munna Ram, (Chainman)

R/O Village Kotrdi Kanlog, P.O. Rama, Tehsil Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. by the (i) The

Collector Forest Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (ii) The

Assistant Conservator of Forest, Settlement Solan and Sirmour at Nahan, Distt. Sirmour,

(H.P.) from time to time w.e.f. 1998 to 2007 and finally w.e.f. 17.2.2008 without complying

the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, is legal and justified? If not, to what relief of

reinstatement and other service benefits Sh. Sukh Dev workman is entitled to?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 15th October, 2011

No.11-5/99(Lab) ID/2009/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Tej Singh S/O Sh. Moti Chand R/O Village Ghisal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. V/s The Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Killar (Pangi) Distt. Chamba ( H.P.)

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Tej Singh S/O Sh. Moti Chand R/O Village Ghisal, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, Distt. Chamba, H.P. by The Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Killar (Pangi), Distt. Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. January, 2002 to July, 2005 and finally w.e.f. October, 2005 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 24th October, 2011

No. 11-2/93(Lab)ID/10/Solan.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Smt. Zeerina W/O Sh. Sadhu Ram, Village Degu, P.O. Narag, Tehsil Pachhad, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) V/s i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer).

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Smt. Zeerina W/O Sh. Sadhu Ram, Village Degu, P.O. Narag, Tehsil Pachhad, Distt. Sirmour, (H.P.) w.e.f. 28.11.2009 by i) Hony. Advisor, M/s Sanitation Promotion & Development Society, 5-B, Pocket-2, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi (Contractor Society) and ii) The Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni, Distt. Solan, H.P. (Principal Employer), however no Registration Certificate and License was respectively obtained by the Principal Employer & Contractor as provided in The Contract Labour ( R & A) Act, 1970 and not giving her an opportunity of consideration for re-employment by the employers from the dates her juniors were allegedly employed, thus in violation of provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G & H of the ibid Act and further demand to declare her direct employee of the Principal Employer, is legal and justified, if not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, compensation and relief the above worker is entitled to from the above Employers/Management?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla- 171 002, the 13th January, 2012

No. Shram (B) 1-3/2005-Estt.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred under section- 8 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act no. 14 of 1947) and in consultation with the Hon'ble High Court, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to appoint Shri Rajan Gupta , presently posted as Additional District and Session Judge, Una as Presiding Officer of the Labour Court- cum-Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala on deputation basis with immediate effect. The period of deputation will be two years in the first instance.

The deputation period will be governed on usual terms and conditions of deputation as specified by the Hon'ble High Court vide letter No. HHC/ Admn. 28 (27) 80- 1530 dated 7th December, 1989 from the Registrar, Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to relieve Sh. Chirag Bhanu Singh, Presiding Officer, Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala enabling him to join further assignment.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Lab. & Emp.) .

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, 18th July, 2011

No. Shram(B)3-1/2006 (Estt.) L.O.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee is pleased to order the promotion of Sh. Prem Singh, Labour Inspector to the post of Labour Officer, (Class-II, Gazetted) in the pay scale of Rs. 7000-10980 (Pre-Revised) Rs. 10300-34800+Rs. 4400/- G.P., in the Labour and Employment Department, Himachal Pradesh, on regular basis in pursuance of Deptt. Of Personnel instruction's issued vide letter No. PER(AP)-C-F(1)-1/2009, dated 16th November,2009, in the public interest.

2. The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to post him as Labour Officer at Bilaspur against vacancy.

3. Sh. Prem Singh, on his promotion, shall remain on probation for a period of two years in the first instance. He shall be entitled to exercise for fixation of pay under the provisions of F.R.22(1)(a)(i) within one month from the date of receipt of this order.

4. Sh. Prem Singh is directed to report for duty at his new place of posting within a fortnight positively. The promotion shall take place on joining at new place of posting. No extension in joining period will be allowed in any case.

By order, Sd/- Addl.Chief Secretary (Lab.& Emp.).

________

लोक निर्माण विभाग

शुद्धिपत्र

शिमला-2, 17 जनवरी, 2012

संख्या पी0बी0डब्ल्यू0-ए-बी(2)-112/1993-I.—इस विभाग की सम संख्यक अधिसूचना दिनांक 10-01-2012 के द्वारा कनिष्ठ अभियन्ता (विद्युत) के भर्ती एवं प्रोन्नति नियम अधिसूचित किए गये थे। इस अधिसूचना के हिन्दी संस्करण में पैरा 1 (i) के स्थान पर निम्न पढ़ा जायेः-

1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.-(i) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक निर्माण विभाग, कनिष्ठ अभियन्ता (विद्युत) वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित) भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2012 है।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (लोक निर्माण)।5186 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933

बहुउद्देशीय परियोजनाऐं एवं विद्युत विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला, 17 जनवरी, 2012

संख्या विद्युत-छः (5)-6/2011.-यतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल को यह प्रतीत हेाता है कि हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य विद्युत परिषद्‌ लिमिटेड, जो कि भूमि अर्जन अधिनियम 1894 (1894 का पहला अधिनियम) की धारा 3 के खण्ड (सी.सी.) के अन्तर्गत सरकार के स्वामित्व और नियन्त्रण के अधीन एक निगम है, के द्वारा अपने व्यय पर सार्वजनिक प्रयोजन हेतु नामक मुहाल जमटा, तहसील नाहन, जिला सिरमौर, हिमाचल प्रदेश में 220 के0 वी0 लाईन जमटा से देवनी व 132 के0 वी0 लाईन देवनी से 132/33/11 के0 वी0 सब-स्टेशन (जोहडो) कालाआम्ब के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जित करनी अति आवश्यक अपेक्षित है अतएव एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि उक्त परिक्षेत्र में जैसा कि निम्न विवरणी में निर्दिष्ट किया गया है उपरोक्त प्रयोजन के लिए भूमि का अर्जन अपेक्षित है।

2. यह अधिसूचना ऐसे सभी व्यक्तियों को जो इससे सम्बन्धित हैं या हो सकते हैं की जानकारी के लिए भू-अर्जन अधिनियम, 1894 की धारा-4 के उपबन्धों के अन्तर्गत जारी की जाती है।

3. पूर्वोक्त धारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश इस समय इस उपक्रम में कार्यरत सभी अधिकारियों उनके कर्मचारियों और श्रमिकों को इलाके की किसी भी भूमि में प्रवेश करने और सर्वेक्षण करने और उस धारा द्वारा अपेक्षित अथवा अनुमतः सभी अन्य कार्यों को करने के लिए सहर्ष प्राधिकार देते हैं।

4. अत्यधिक आवश्यकता को दृष्टि में रखते हुए राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश उक्त अधिनियम की धारा 17 की उप धारा (4) के अधीन यह भी निर्देश देते है कि उक्त अधिनियम की धारा- 5ए के उपबन्ध इस मामले मे लागू नही होंगे।

5. भूमि से सम्बन्धित रेखांक का निरीक्षण कार्यालय भू-अर्जन समाहर्ता, हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य विद्युत परिषद्‌ लिमिटेड, उत्तम भवन, शिमला-4 में किया जा सकता हैं।

विवरणी

जिला तहसील ग्राम खसरा नम्बर रकबा (बीधो में) सिरमौर नाहन जमटा 753/57/1 0-2 645/518/37/1 0-4 कुल कित्ता-2 कुल रकवा-0-6

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (विद्युत)।

-------

बहुउ६ेशीय परियोजनाएॅ एवं विद्युत विभाग

अधिसूचना (शुद्धि पत्र)

16 जनवरी, 2012

संख्या विद्युत-छः-(5)-23/2011.-इस विभाग की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना दिनांक 03-12-2011 जो कि ग्राम फाटी व कोठी शैंशर, उप-तहसील सैंज, जिला कुल्लू में भूमि अधिग्रहण करने हेतु जारी की गई है, की विवरणी में ''तहसील उदयपुर'' के स्थान पर ''उप-तहसील सैंज'' पढ़ा जाए।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (विद्युत)।5187 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 बहुउद्देशीय परियोजनाऐं एवं विद्युत विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला, 17 जनवरी, 2012

संख्या विद्युत-छः(5)-21/2011.-राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, मियाड़ जल विद्युत परियोजना (120 मैगावाट) के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जन अधिनियम, 1894 की धारा 6 से 16 (दोनो शामिल) तथा धारा 18-37 (दोनों शामिल) के प्रावधान लागू करने हेतु धारा 41 के अन्तर्गत मैसर्ज़ मियाड़ हाईड्रो इलेक्ट्रिक पावर कम्पनी लिमिटेड, डी-425, सैक्टर- 4, न्यू शिमला- 171009 के साथ हुए इकरारनामा (अनुबन्ध-क) को धारा-42 के अन्तर्गत प्रकाशन करने के सहर्ष आदेश प्रदान करते हैं।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (विद्युत)।

-------

अनुबन्ध-क AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 In respect of

Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW)

THIS AGREEMENT is made on this 10th day of January, Two thousand twelve

BETWEEN

The M/s Miyar Hydro Electric Power Company Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having it registered office at D-425, Sector– 4, New Shimla –171009 Himachal Pradesh, through Shri Rajan Saklani, General Manager, appointed by the Company as its Attorney (hereinafter called the "The Company" which expression shall include its heirs, successors and assigns) of the first part.

AND

THE GOVERNOR of Himachal Pradesh through the Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh (Hereinafter called the "Government," which expression shall include its successor in office and assigns) of the Second part.

WHEREAS, upon the application of the Company for the acquisition of surface rights over land required for implementation of Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW), the Government of Himachal Pradesh have agreed to acquire the land on behalf of the Company under the provision of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act No. 1 of 1894), the pieces or parcels of land described and delineated in the Schedule hereto annexed and situated in the revenue estate of Village Ghari and Haruka, Sub-Tehsil Udaipur, Distt. Lahaul & Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, total measuring 61-13-04 bighas. having been shown to the satisfaction of the said Government that the proposed acquisition is needed for implementation of Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW) and whereas the said Government have called upon the Company under the provision of Section 41 of the Act ibid to enter into an agreement with the Government hereinafter contained.

Now, these presents witness and it is hereby agreed and declared as follows:-

1. On demand, the Company shall pay to the Government of Himachal Pradesh all and every compensation in respect of the said land tendered, paid or awarded to be tendered, paid or awarded by the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, or by the Court or Courts to which an appeal from the award of the said Court may be preferred and all costs, charges and expenses of the proceedings in the aforesaid Courts or otherwise incidental to the proposed acquisition or payable in respect thereof under the provision of the said Act.

2. On demand, made by the said Collector the obligations of the company under the last preceding clause not being thereby limited, the Company shall deposit with the said Collector such sum or sums of money as in the discretion the said Collector may in anticipation estimate to be necessary for the purpose mentioned in the preceding clause.

3. On payment by the Company of all demands under the foregoing first clause, or, in the discretion of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh (On deposit by the Company of all estimated amounts as provided in the section clause) but not before possession shall have been taken under the provisions of the above mentioned Act, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh shall make over possession of the said land to the company and shall execute and do such all acts and deeds as may be necessary and proper for effectually vesting the same in the Company.

4. In case, Company has offered the land and construction etc. there in as security with the previous sanction of the Government for raising loans from financial Institutions/ Banks etc., within India and outside, the Government not withstanding such sanction shall have recourse to its rights for resumption of the land under this clause even during the period such loan is outstanding, if the land is not utilized for the purpose for which it was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5. The said land shall be held by the Company for the purpose for which it is acquired or purpose legitimately connected as is herein before mentioned and without the sanction in writing of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh first had obtained for no other purpose whatsoever.

6. That said construction shall be completed and fully equipped in all respect ready for use within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement for the Miyar Hydro Electric Project (120 MW). Should the said construction not be completed (and fully equipped in all respect ready for use) within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement stated in the last preceding clause or within such further period as in its discretion may be prescribed or allowed by the said Government of Himachal Pradesh or should the said land at any time thereafter cease for a period as described by the Government of Himachal Pradesh to be held and used or cease to be required for the purpose or purposes provided for in the foregoing clauses then in any such case, the said Government may summarily re- enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/ buildings thereon, whether such structures/ buildings were erected before or after transfer of the land and buildings shall absolutely cease and determine and vest in the State Government free from all encumbrances.

7. The Company shall provide employment to one member of each of the displaced families during the construction period of the project, which shall form part of the rehabilitation plan to be prepared and implemented at the cost of the company.

During the operation and maintenance of the project, the company shall give preference for employment to the members of the displaced families employed during the construction period.

8. In case of breach of any condition by the company, the state Government shall have right to determine the agreement by 15 days show cause notice to the company. In case the company fails to explain its position to the satisfaction of the State Government and rectify the breach of the conditions so enumerated in the show cause notice, the State Government shall have absolute right to rescind the agreement and re-enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/ buildings thereon and thereupon the interest of the Company in the said land and structures/ buildings shall cease and determine and vest in the State Government free from all encumbrances.

IN WITNESS Where of the seal of the Company has been affixed and the Government of the State of Himachal Pradesh herein to set his hand and seal, the day month and year herein above mentioned.

For and on behalf of Governor of Himachal Pradesh Miyar Hydro Electric Power Co. Ltd. Through

Sd/- Sd/- (Rajan Saklani) Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

Witness: Witness: 1. Sd/- 1. Sd/-

2. Sd/- 2. Sd/-

____________

SCHEDULE

District Sub-Tehsil Village Khasra No. Area (Bigha) Lahaul & Spiti Udaipur Ghari 4 00-12-00 5 00-08-00 39 01-13-00 44 01-00-00 187 00-00-06 188 00-02-00 218/1 00-05-14 218/2 00-14-08 219/1 00-01-16 Kitta: 9 Area: 04-17-04 Haruka 71 02-03-00 72 00-07-00 73 03-19-00 74 00-19-00 75 00-06-00 76 01-11-00 77 02-09-00 78 01-13-00 322/79 00-08-005190 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 80 00-10-00 81 00-07-00 82 01-02-00 83 01-03-00 84 00-11-00 85 00-10-00 326/86 00-13-00 106 01-12-00 430/107 00-17-00 431/107 0000-17-00 120 01-10-00 121 02-09-00 314/123 00-02-00 315/123 02-02-00 124 01-07-00 125 00-18-00 126 00-05-00 127 00-11-00 436/128 00-12-00 437/128 00-12-00 438/128 00-01-00 129 01-01-00 129/1 01-00-00 439/13 0 00-08-00 440/130 00-10-00 131 00-02-00 132 01-05-00 133 00-12-00 134 00-13-00 135 01-00-00 136 01-06-00 137 01-08-00 138 00-01-00 139 01-08-00 143 00-05-00 144 00-07-00 145 00-04-00 146 00-03-00 147 00-16-00 148 01-03-00 149 01-04-00 150 02-11-00 151 01-10-00 152 00-14-00 153 00-18-00 154 01-01-00 155 02-04-00 156 00-06-00 157 00-10-00 Kitta: 58 Area: 56-16-00 Total Kitta: 67 Total Area: 61-13-045191 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 बहुउद्देशीय परियोजनाऐं एवं विद्युत विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला, 17 जनवरी, 2012

संख्या विद्युत-छः(5)-49/2010.-राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शोरंग जल विद्युत परियोजना (100 मैगावाट) के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जन अधिनियम, 1894 की धारा 6 से 16 (दोनो शामिल) तथा धारा 18-37 (दोनों शामिल) के प्रावधान लागू करने हेतु धारा 41 के अन्तर्गत मैसर्ज़ हिमाचल शोरंग पावर प्राईवेट लिमिटेड, सी- 35, लेन-।।, सैक्टर-।, न्यू शिमला- 171009 के साथ हुए इकरारनामा (अनुबन्ध-क) को धारा-42 के अन्तर्गत प्रकाशन करने के सहर्ष आदेश प्रदान करते हैं।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (विद्युत)।

-------

अनुबन्ध-क AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 41 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894

In respect of

Sorang Hydroelectric Project (100 MW)

THIS AGREEMENT is made on this 10th day of January, Two thousand twelve

BETWEEN

The M/s Himachal Sorang Power Pvt. Ltd. C–35, Lane – II, Sector – I, New Shimla, Shimla –171 009, a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and having it registered office at C – 35, Lane – II, Sector – I, New Shimla, Shimla –171009 through Shri Anup Singh Banyal, Manager, appointed by the Company as its Attorney (hereinafter called "The Company" which expression shall include its heirs, successors and assigns) of the first part.

AND

THE GOVERNOR of Himachal Pradesh through the Principal Secretary (MPP& Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh (Hereinafter called the "Government", which expression shall include its successors in office and assigns) of the Second part.

WHEREAS, upon the applicant of the Company for the acquisition of surface rights over land required for implementation of 100 MW Sorang Hydroelectric Project, the Government of Himachal Pradesh have agreed to acquire the land on behalf of the Company under the provision of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act No.1 of 1894), the pieces or parcels of land described and delineated in the Schedule hereto annexed and situated in the revenue estate of Village Sorang, Tehsil Nichar, Distt. Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, total measuring 01-99-13 hect. having been shown to the satisfaction of the said Government that the proposed acquisition is needed for implementation of 100 MW Sorang Hydroelectric Project and whereas the said Government have called upon the Company under the provisions of Section 41 of the Act ibid to enter into an agreement with the Government hereinafter contained.

Now, these presents witness and it is hereby agreed and declared as follows:-

1. On demand, the Company shall pay to the Government of Himachal Pradesh all and every compensation in respect of the said land tendered, paid or awarded to be tendered, paid or awarded by the Collector under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, or by the Court or Courts to which an appeal from the award of the said Court may be preferred and all costs, charges and expenses of the proceedings in the aforesaid Courts or otherwise incidental to the proposed acquisition or payable in respect thereof under the provisions of the said Act.

2. On demand, made by the said Collector the obligations of the Company under the last preceding clause not being thereby limited, the Company shall deposit with the said Collector such sum or sums of money as in his discretion the said Collector may in anticipation estimate to be necessary for the purpose mentioned in the preceding clause.

3. On payment by the Company of all demands under the foregoing first clause, or, in the discretion of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh( On deposit by the Company of all estimated amounts as provided in the section clause) but not before possession shall have been taken under the provisions of the above mentioned Act, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh shall make over possession of the said land to the company and shall execute and do such all acts and deeds as may be necessary and proper for effectually vesting the same in the Company.

4. In case, Company has offered the land and construction etc. there in as security with the previous sanction of the Government for raising loans from financial Institutions/Banks etc., within in India and outside, the Government not withstanding such sanction shall have recourse to its rights for resumption of the land under this clause even during the period such loan is outstanding, if the land is not utilized for the purpose for which it was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5. The said land shall be held by the Company for the purpose for which it is acquired or purpose legitimately connected as is herein before mentioned and without the sanction in writing of the said Government of Himachal Pradesh first had obtained for no other purpose whatsoever.

6. That said construction shall be completed and fully equipped in all respect ready for use within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement for the Sorang (100 MW) Hydroelectric Project. Should the said construction not be completed ( and fully equipped in all respect ready for use) within the time schedule as stipulated in the Implementation Agreement stated in the last preceding clause or within such further period as in its discretion may be prescribed or allowed by the said Government of Himachal Pradesh or should the said land at any time thereafter cease for a period as prescribed by the Government of Himachal Pradesh to be held and used or cease to be required for the purpose or purposes provided for in the foregoing clauses then in any such case, the said Government may summarily re- enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/ buildings thereon, whether such structures/buildings were erected before or after transfer of the land and buildings shall absolutely cease and determine and vest in the State Government free from all encumbrances.

7. The company shall provide employment to one member of each of the displaced families during the construction period of the project, which shall form part of the rehabilitation plan to be prepared and implemented at the cost of company. During5193 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 the operation and maintenance of the project, the company shall give preference for employment to the members of the displaced families employed during the construction period.

8. In case of breach of any conditions by the company, the state Government shall have right to determine the agreement by giving 15 days show cause notice to the company. In case the company fails to explain its position to the satisfaction of the State Government and rectify the breach of the conditions so enumerated in the show cause notice, the State Government shall have absolute right to rescind the agreement and re-enter upon and take possession of the said land together with all structures/buildings thereon and thereupon the interest of the company in the said land and structures/ buildings shall cease and determine and vest in the state Government free from all encumbrances.

IN WITNESS Where of the seal of the Company has been affixed and the Government of the State of Himachal Pradesh herein to set his hand and seal, the day month and year herein above mentioned.

For and behalf of M/s Himachal Sorang Power Pvt. Ltd. Witness: 1. Sd/-

Sd/ (Anup Singh Banyal)

Manager

2. Sd/-

Governor of Himachal Pradesh

Through Principal Secretary (Power) to the Witness: Government of Himachal Pradesh 1. Sd/-

Sd/- Principal Secretary (Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, 2. Sd/-

_________

SCHEDULE

District Tehsil Village Khasra No. Area (Hect.) Kinnaur Nichar Choura 31/2 00-14-43 402/57/1 00-25-73 6 00-08-88 7 00-01-90 8 00-00-72 9 00-05-92 Shilani 716/1 00-09-00 Barakamba 110/1 00-01-55 106/2/1 00-00-90 108/2 00-03-05 108/3 00-00-64 1917/2 00-01-67 2021/1375/1 00-00-805194 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933 105/1 00-00-79 1371 00-01-20 1364 00-00-12 1553 00-01-49 1349/1 00-00-39 1388/1 00-00-38 1361 00-00-63 1372 00-02-57 1336/1 00-00-62 1340 00-00-50 1362 00-02-70 1337/1 00-00-58 1363 00-00-52 1369/1 00-00-28 1328/1 00-00-36 117/1 00-02-18 1698/1 00-01-24 118 00-00-38 Burang 676 00-05-50 677 00-00-98 652/1 00-19-20 652/2 00-00-67 653 00-01-52 655 00-00-79 661 00-03-84 684 00-02-44 727/1 00-00-83 727/2 00-12-37 695 00-01-88 697/2 00-10-59 696 00-00-21 698 00-00-58 699 00-00-28 485/2/1 00-01-62 672 00-04-31 673 00-00-56 674 00-03-15 675 00-03-50 631/1 00-00-80 630 00-01-30 688 00-03-84 722/1 00-02-63 704 00-05-19 606 00-02-57 609 00-01-48 610 00-01-31 607 00-00-10 608 00-03-71 627 00-05-37 612 00-03-89

Kita- 63 Total Area 01-99-135195 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 18 जनवरी, 2012/28 पौष, 1933

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित