Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 221, 30 January 2012

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शिमला, सोमवार 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ 1933

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

TOURISM AND CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, 30th January, 2012

No. Tsm-F(6)-3/2001-II.—In supersession of this department's notification (s) No.Tsm- F(6)-3/2001-loose dated 28.5.2007, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in exercise of the powers vested in her under rule-6 & 8 of the Himachal Pradesh Aero Sports Rules, 2004 read with H.P.Aero Sports (Amendment) Rules, 2008, is pleased to constitute a Technical Committee having jurisdiction over the whole of the State and a Regulatory Committee for each Aero Sport site as under :-

Technical Committee :

1. Commissioner-cum-Director, Tourism Chairman 2. Director, Western Himalayan Mountaineering Institute, Manali Vice-Chairman 3. Representative of State Aero Sports Association Member 221-राजपत्र/2012-30-1-2012 (5353)5354 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 4. Representative of Aero Sports of India Member 5. One member each from the Registered Association in Himachal Pradesh/Concerned District Association Member 6. Representative of Chief Medical Officer of concerned area Member 7. District Tourism Development Officer/Assistant Tourism Development Officer of the concerned area. Member-

Secretary".

Regulatory Committee :

1. Deputy Commissioner of the concerned District Chairman 2. Superintendent of Police of the concerned District or his nominee Member 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil) of concerned District or his nominee Member 4. Medical Officer of the concerned area Member 5. Representative of the District Aero Sports Association/registered Aero Sports association of the concerned Area Member 6. District Tourism Development Officer/Assistant Tourism Development Officer of the Concerned District Member

Secretary." The scope of works of so constituted Committees is defined in the Himachal Pradesh Aero Sports Rules, 2004 (amended from time to time).

The non-official members in such committees have already been nominated vide this department's of even number dated 31.7.2009.

By order, MANISHA NANDA, Pr.Secretary(Tourism & CA).

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011

No. 11-1/11(Lab) I.D/2011-Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Bir Singh R/O Village and P.O. Lodhwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. The Factory Manager, M/s United Wire Products, Village and P.O. Lodhwan, District Kangra, H.P.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla / Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

5355 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Bir Singh R/O Village and P.O. Lodhwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., Labourer, by the Factory Manager, M/s United Wire Products, Village and P.O. Lodhwan, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 10-04-2009 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, theundersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Marahaju Devi W/O Shri Jagat Ram, R/O Village Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08-07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5356 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 9th December, 2011 No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Panjabi Devi W/O Shri Ram Saran, R/O Village Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Panjabi Devi W/O Shri Ram Saran, R/O Village Kapahi, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08- 07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 13th October, 2011

No. 11-1/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Paramjeet Singh S/O Shri Badan Singh Pathania, R/O Village & Post Office Malnoo, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. Vs. The Vice Chancellor, Chaudhry Sarwan Kumar, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishva Vidyalya, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per5357 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Paramjeet Singh S/O Shri Badan Singh Pathania daily wages worker by the Vice Chancellor, Chaudhry Sarwan Kumar, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishva Vidyalya, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. April, 2010 without serving notice, without holding enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named daily wages worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, July, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Puran Chand S/O Shri Param R/O Village Shiva Badar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.

"Whether termination by verbal orders of the services of Shri Puran Chand S/O Shri Param by the Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. August, 2004 without serving advance notice, without paying compensation, without holding enquiry, thus without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what amount of back wages, past service benefits and relief the above workman is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5358 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011 No. 11-3/93(Lab) I.D/2011-Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Changa Ram, R/O Village & P.O. Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. Vs. The Divisional Forest Officer, Parvati Forest Division, Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P.

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Changa Ram, Village & P.O. Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. part time sweeper by the Divisional Forest Officer, Parvati Forest Division, Shamshi, District Kullu, H.P. w.e.f. 01-06-2010 without complying with the provisionsSection 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, July, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Rama Devi W/O Shri Inder Singh R/O Village & P.O. Tandu, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The District Panchyat Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per5359 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Rama Devi W/O Shri Inder Singh by the District Panchyat Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-12-2009 without serving advance notice, without payment of compensation, thus without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what amount of back wages, past service benefits and relief the above named worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 19th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Raman Kumar S/O Bakhtawar Singh, R/O Village and P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Raman Kumar S/O Bakhtawar Singh, R/O Village and P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 7,082/- as full and final settlement is proper and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5360 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 5th December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Rohit Kumar S/O Shri Jagtar Singh, R/O Village and P.O. Duleher, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.

"Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Rohit Kumar S/O Shri Jagtar Singh, R/O Village and P.O. Duleher, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 7,326/- as full and final settlement as per provisions of all applicable Acts and Rules is proper and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 19th October, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Saran Pat S/O Shri Ram Dhan, R/O Village Thalana, P.O. Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. (1) The Pardhan, Gram Panchyat Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. (2) The Executive Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.

5361 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Saran Pat S/O Shri Ram Dhan Water Guard by the (1) The Pardhan, Gram Panchyat Bandhi, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (2) The Executive Engineer, I. & P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. who was appointed in consultation with and after approval of, as well as, wages were reimbursed by the Assistant Engineer, I.& P.H. Division, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 07-04-2008 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Smt. Sukri Devi W/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Vs. The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Sukri Devi W/O Shri Prem Singh, R/O Gehra Trembla, P.O. Longni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. (B&R) Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08- 07-2005 without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to from the concerned employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5362 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 3rd December, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) I.D/2011-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Surinder Singh S/O Shri Banta Singh, R/O Village Malluwal, P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. Vs. The Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the retrenchment of services of Shri Surinder Singh S/O Shri Banta Singh, R/O Village Malluwal, P.O. Polian-Bheet, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. (Helper) by the Managing Director, M/S Adinath Rubbers Private Limited, Industrial Area, Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 10-07-2010 after paying him Rs. 8,478/- as full and final settlement as per provisions of all applicable Acts and Rules is proper and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority and past service benefits the above Ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 23rd November, 2011

No. 11-6/85(Lab) I.D/2011-Shimla.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exists between Shri Vrinder Thakur R/O House No. C-19/100, Lower Phagli, Shimla-4 Vs. The Manager, M/S Padmawati Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9, H.P.

5363 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla/Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Vrinder Thakur R/O House No. C-19/100, Lower Phagli, Shimla-4, Customer Care Officer, as per demand notice drawing wages @ Rs. 3,000/- per month by the Manager, M/s Padmawati Balaji S.T.P.I. Kasumpti, Shimla-9, H.P. w.e.f. 31-01-2010 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 8th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2010/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between Sh. Ajit Sharma S/O Sh. Brij Lal Sharma R/O Village Narkheda ( Theru), P.O. Nara, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. V/s The Factory Manager, M/s Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of Sh. Ajit Sharma S/O Sh. Brij Lal Sharma (Helper) R/O Village Narkheda ( Theru), P.O. Nara, Tehsil Barsar, Distt. Hamirpur (H.P.) by The Factory Manager, M/s Rangar Breweries Ltd. Plot No. 1 & 130, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Distt. Una, (H.P.) w.e.f. 27.9.2009 without complying with the provisions of natural justice & Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, seniority, service benefits and relief the above named workman is entitled to ?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5364 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Smt. Barfi Devi W/O Sh. Biri Singh, Village Kohan, P.O. Sajao Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned andas per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Barfi Devi W/O Sh. Biri Singh, Village Kohan, P.O. Sajao Piplu, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 29th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Nand Lal S/O Sh. Lobhi Ram, Village Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per5365 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Nand Lal S/O Sh. Lobhi Ram, Village Sanour, P.O. Sari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex- Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Chaudhary Ram S/O Sh. Noopa Ram, Village- Naraingarh, P.O. Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Chaudhary Ram S/O Sh. Noopa Ram, Village- Naraingarh, P.O. Tanehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5366 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Sh. Chaudhary Ram, Village & Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Fulmu Devi W/O Sh. Chaudhary Ram, Village & Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001 30th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Smt. Rani Devi W/O Sh. Balbir Singh, Village- Tarun, P.O. Samour, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per5367 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Rani Devi W/O Sh. Balbir Singh, Village- Tarun, P.O. Samour, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the ExecutiveEngineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Bachitar Singh S/O Sh. Hirda Ram, R/O Village & Post Office Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Bachitar Singh S/O Sh. Hirda Ram, R/O Village & Post Office Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5368 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 30th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Ravi Dass S/O Sh. Harji Ram, Village Jangel, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Ravi Dass S/O Sh. Harji Ram, Village Jangel, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 14th November, 2011

No. 11-1/86(Lab) ID/11/Paonta.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute about the following issue exist between 1.) Sh. Dev Raj S/O Sh. Punnu Ram, VPO Dhaula Kuan, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. 2.) Sh. Sharafat Ali S/O Sh. Mohammad Ali, R/O VPO Rajgarh, District Sirmour, H.P. 3.) Sh. Firoz Khan S/O Sh. Asgar Ali R/O Rampur Banjaran, P.O. Dhaula Kuan, District Sirmour, H.P 4.) Ms. Rukmani Devi D/O Sh. Netar Singh, R/O VPO Kolar, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. V/s The Fruit Technologist, Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.

As per the report under section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power5369 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether termination of the services of S/Sh. Dev Raj S/O Sh. Punnu Ram, Sharafat Ali S/O Sh. Mohammad Ali, Firoz Khan S/O Sh. Asgar Ali and Ms. Rukmani Devi D/O Sh. Netar Singh by The Fruit Technologist, Dhaula Kuan, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. w.e.f. 07.8.2009 without issuing charge sheet, conducting enquiry and without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal andjustified? If not, what service benefits and relief the above named workmen are entitled to from above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Dharam Chand S/O Sh. Inder Singh, Village Jhareda, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Dharam Chand S/O Sh. Inder Singh, Village Jhareda, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5370 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Sohan Singh, Village-Bhatour, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: 19-8/89-Shram (Loose), Dated 7th September, 1992 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamsala, constituted underSection-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Raj Kumar S/O Sh. Sohan Singh, Village- Bhatour, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Lachhman Singh S/O Sh. Bela Singh, Village- Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

5371 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Lachhman Singh S/O Sh. Bela Ram, Village- Langehar, P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. March, 2004, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Sher Singh S/O Sh. Gurdial Singh, R/O Village Thati, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Sher Singh S/O Sh. Gurdial Singh, R/O Village Thati, P.O. Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5372 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Smt. Panchu Devi W/O Sh. Tek Chand , VPO Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Smt. Panchu Devi W/O Sh. Tek Chand , VPO Kot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the aboveemployer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Dabar Singh S/O Sh. Brij Lal, Village Langehar , P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

5373 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Dabar Singh S/O Sh. Brij Lal, Village Langehar , P.O. Giyun, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, 28th November, 2011

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2011/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that industrial disputes about the following issue exist between Sh. Ramesh Chand S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village-Malhi Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. V/S The Executive Engineer, HPPWD( B & R) Division Dharampur, Distt. Mandi, H.P.

"Whether retrenchment of services of Sh. Ramesh Chand S/O Sh. Dev Raj, Village-Malhi Banwar, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.7.2005, without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above Ex-Worker is entitled to from the above employer?"Sd/- Labour Commissioner. 5374 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933 In the Court of Shri Balbir Thakur HAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :—

Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, H.P.

Smt. Nisha d/o Sh. Khekh Ram, r/o Village Bagan, P.O. Barahi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. presently w/o Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registeration of Marriage Under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, H.P. and Smt. Nisha d/o Sh. Khekh Ram, r/o Village Bagan, P.O. Barahi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. presently w/o Sh. Paras Ram s/o Sh. Kalu Ram, r/o Village and P.O. Baragran, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, H.P. has presented an application on 2-1-2012 in this court for the registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of General Public that if any persons have any objections for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this court on or before 1-2-2012 at 2.00 P.M. to object registration of marriage personally or through an authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordinngly.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 2-1-2012.

Seal.

BALBIR THAKUR HAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh.

_________

In the Court of Shri Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh

File No. 02 of 2012 Instituted on : 10-1-2012 Next date of hearing : 31-1-2012 In the matter of :—

1. Sh. Mukesh s/o Sh. Dharam Singh r/o Village Ropi, P.O. Padhar, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P.

2. Smt. Sita Devi d/o Sh. Lekh Raj, r/o Village Bid, P.O. Gahar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. . .Applicants.

Versus

General Public . .Respondents.

5375 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

Application for the registeration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Whereas Sh. Mukesh s/o Sh. Dharam Singh r/o Village Ropi, P.O. Padhar, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. and Smt. Sita Devi d/o Sh. Lekh Raj, r/o Village Bid, P.O. Gahar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Both have presented an application for the registration of their marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of general public that if any persons have any objections for the registration of the above marriage can appear in this court on or before 31-1-2012 at 10.00 A.M. to object registration of marriage personally or through an authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 10-1-2012.

Seal.

Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.

_________

In the Court of Shri Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh

File No. 01 of 2012 Instituted on : 10-1-2012 Next date of hearing : 31-1-2012 In the matter of :—

1. Sh. Krishan Chand s/o Sh. Amar Nath r/o Village Babli, P.O. Padwahan, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P.

2. Tanu d/o Sh. Bhadar Singh, r/o Village Silhgikhad, P.O. Kufari, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. . .Applicants.

Versus

General Public . .Respondents.

Application for the registeration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Whereas Sh. Krishan Chand s/o Sh. Amar Nath r/o Village Babli, P.O. Padwahan, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. and Tanu d/o Sh. Bhadar Singh, r/o Village Silhgikhad, P.O. Kufari, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. Both have presented an application for the registration of their marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court on 10-1-2012.

Seal.

Sudesh Kumar Mokhta IAS, Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Padhar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.

5376 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 30 जनवरी, 2012/10 माघ, 1933

नाम परिवर्तन

सर्वसाधारण को सूचित किया जाता है कि मैं, मनोज कुमार, आयु 34 वर्ष सुपुत्र स्व0 श्री माधव शर्मा, निवासी गांव आंजी, डाकघर चायली, तहसील व जिला शिमला ने अपने सुपुत्र दक्ष का नाम बदलकर देवांग रख लिया है। अतः भविष्य में उसे देवांग के नाम से जाना जाए।

मनोज कुमार,

सुपुत्र स्व0 श्री माधव शर्मा, निवासी गांव आंजी,

डाकघर चायली, तहसील व जिला शिमला। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित