Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 280, 31 March 2014

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शिमला, सोमवार, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

आबकारी एवं कराधान विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 14 मार्च, 2014

संख्याःई.एक्स.एन.-एफ(10)-7/2011-वोल्यमू-I हिमाचल प्रदेश की राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश मूल्य परिवर्धित कर नियम, 2005 के नियम 37-क और सेन्ट्र्‌ॅल सेल्ज टैक्स (हिमाचल प्रदेश) रूल्ज, 1970 के नियम 7 के उप-नियम (2-ए) के अधीन उनमें निहित शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए अधिसूचित करती हैं कि हिमाचल प्रदेश मूल्य परिवर्धित कर अधिनियम, 2005 और केन्द्रीय विक्रय कर अधिनियम, 1956 के अधीन 280-राजपत्र/2014-31-3-2014 (7631) 7632 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 रजिस्ट्रीकृत उन समस्त व्यौहारियों को, जिनका वार्षिक आवर्त 40.00 लाख रुपए या इसके अधिक है, 1-4-2014 से कर का संदाय, आबकारी एवं कराधान विभाग के पोर्टल के माध्यम से, इलैट्रॉनिकली करना अनिवार्य होगा।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (आबकारी एवं कराधान)।

__________

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. EXN-F(10)-7/2011-Vol.I

dated 14-03-2014 required under Clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India].

EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 14th March, 2014

No. EXN-F(10)-7/2011-Vol.I.—In exercise of the powers vested in her under rule 37-A of the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 and sub-rule (2-A) of rule 7 of the Central Sales Tax (Himachal Pradesh) Rules,1970 the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to notify that all dealers registered under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 having annual turnover of Rs. 40.00 Lakh and above shall compulsorily pay tax electronically through the portal of the Excise and Taxation department with effect from 01-04-2014.

By order, Sd/- Principal Secretary (E&T).

_________

HOME DEPARTMENT (PROSECUTION)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002 the 28th March, 2014

No. Home (G)B(2)4/2013.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, is pleased to promote Shri Jagdish Singh Rana, District Attorney (Class-I, Gazetted) to the post of Joint Director (Class-I, Gazetted) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+8400 G.P. with immediate effect.

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is further pleased to post Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana as Joint Director, in the Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla.

Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana shall be on probation for a period of two years or till the date he retires from the Government service whichever is earlier.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

N-16:—Since model code of conduct is enforced in the State due to Lok Sabha Elections, we may, if approved, obtain the approval of Election Commission of India in the matter of promotion/posting of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana to the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) as per draft (in fair) placed below for favour of approval/signatures please.

_________

No. Home (G)B(14) 6/11 Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Home (G)

From:

The Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

To

The Election-cum-Chief Electoral Officer, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-9.

Dated: Shimla-2, the

Subject.—Promotion/posting of Joint Director (Prosecution).

Sir,

I am directed to state that Meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee to consider the eligible District Attorney (Class-I) for promotion to the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class- I) was held on 5-3-2014. The Committee recommended the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana, only eligible officer for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution. Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana is presently holding the charge of Joint Director (Prosecution) in the Directorate of Prosecution and his posting on promotion has been proposed/approved at the same place i.e. Directorate of Prosecution, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-9 against vacancy.

Since the model code of conduct is enforced in view of declaration of Lok Sabha Elections in the Country, you are, therefore, requested to obtain and convey the necessary approval of the Election Commission of India in the matter of promotion/postings of above officer. It is relevant to mention here that above office is not directly or indirectly connected with the election process.

Yours faithfully, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

____________

No. Home (G)B(14) 6/11 Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Home (G)

From:

The Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.

To

The Election-cum-Chief Electoral Officer, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-9.

Dated: Shimla-2, the

Subject.—Promotion/posting of Deputy District Attorneys.

Sir,

I am directed to state that Meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee to consider eligible Assistant District Attorney (Class-I) to the post of Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I) was held on 5.3.2014. The Committee recommended the following officers for promotion to the post of Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I):—

Clear Cut Vacancies

1. Sh. Vijay Kumar 2. Sh. Sanjeev Singh Rana 3. Sh. Vinod Bhardwaj 4. Sh. Narain Singh Chauhan 5. Sh. Bhisham Jawal Badresh Chand 6. Sh. Bhuvnesh 7. Sh. Kulbhushan Gautam 8. Sh. Sudeep Singh 9. Sh. Kapil Dev 10. Sh. Jitender Kumar 11. Sh. Umesh Kumar Sharma 12. Sh. Naveen Chander 13. Sh. Yash Pal Singh 14. Sh. Rajeshwar Dutt Sharma 15. Ms. Sheetal Bansal 16. Smt. Champa Devi

(Anticipated vacancies)

1. Sh. Sandeep Kumar 2. Sh. Eklavya 3. Sh. Devender Kumar 4. Sh. Sanjay Pandit

In addition to above, it has also been decided to post Assistant District Attorneys on promotion as Deputy District Attorneys as under:—

Since the model code of conduct is enforced in view of declaration of Lok Sabha Elections in the Country, you are, therefore, requested to obtain and convey the necessary approval of the Election Commission of India in the matter of promotion/postings of above officers. It is relevant to mention here that officers of this department are not directly or indirectly connected with the election process.

Yours faithfully, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

(From pre-page)

At Flag-A is the minutes of meeting of D.P.C. held on 5.03.2014 in the office room of Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) to the Govt. of H.P. for consideration of eligible officers for promotion to the post of Deputy District Attorneys in Prosecution department. The DPC has recommended a panel of 20 officers (Asstt. Distt. Attorney) for promotion to the post of Deputy District Attorneys, the detail of which is given as under:—

Clear Cut Vacancies

5. Sh. Vijay Kumar 6. Sh. Sanjeev Singh Rana 7. Sh. Vinod Bhardwaj 8. Sh. Narain Singh Chauhan 5. Sh. Bhisham Jawal Badresh Chand 6. Sh. Bhuvnesh 7. Sh. Kulbhushan Gautam 8. Sh. Sudeep Singh 9. Sh. Kapil Dev 10. Sh. Jitender Kumar 11. Sh. Umesh Kumar Sharma 12. Sh. Naveen Chander 13. Sh. Yash Pal Singh 14. Sh. Rajeshwar Dutt Sharma 15. Ms. Sheetal Bansal 16. Smt. Champa Devi

(Anticipated vacancies)

5. Sh. Sandeep Kumar 6. Sh. Eklavya 7. Sh. Devender Kumar 8. Sh. Sanjay Pandit7636 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 Vacancy position of DDA is given at F/X. So far as their postings are concerned, it is submitted that most of above officers are posted in Sub-Divisions (except S. No. 14 & 15) where only one post is created. In case these officers are transferred on their promotion, then there will left no officer for prosecuting the court cases in the courts in their respective place of posting. In view of this, office proposes the transfer/posting/adjustment of Dy. Dsitt. Attorneys only on those places where these officers can be spared for postings/are essentially required:—

Other officers we may allow to continue to work at their present place of postings till further orders.

The Hon'ble Chief Minister, being Minister-in-Charge may kindly be requested to kindly approve the proceedings of the DPC meeting/promotion of above Assistant District Attorneys and postings please.

___________

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE

HELD ON 05.03.2014 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE OFFICE ROOM OF THE ADDITIONAL

CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

Present:

1. Sh. P. Mitra

Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) …..Chairman.

2. Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma ……Member Deputy Secretary (Home)

3. Sh. M.R. Sharma ……Member Director (Prosecution)

ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBLE OFFICERS FOR PROMOTION TO THE

POST OF JOINT DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION) (CLASS-I, GAZETTED) IN

THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

The Departmental Promotion Committee was informed that two posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class-I) Gazetted in the pay scale of Rs. 15600- 39100+8400 G.P. in the department of Prosecution is required to be filed up by promotion on the basis of selection which have been7637 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 caused due to promotion of Sh. B.S. Pathania and Sh. M.R. Sharma Joint Director as Director (Prosecution) in month of 21.6. 2013 and 1.3.2014.

2. As per the notified provisions of Recruitment and Promotion Rules, the posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) are to be filled up by promotion from amongst the eligible District Attorneys on 'Selection basis' (Merit-cum-seniority) who have completed five years service as District Attorney (Including adhoc service.) The Committee was further informed that since these promotions shall be from Class-I to Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to the SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case as per rules/instructions of the Government.

3. The committee was also informed that at present there is only one District Attorney namely Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana who fulfills the said eligibility criteria of five years of service as District Attorney for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution. Therefore, the Committee only considered the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana, District Attorney for the post of Joint Director, Prosecution.

4. Accordingly, the committee perused the seniority list supplied by the department and considered the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana against the vacant post of Joint Director, Prosecution and considered his ACR's for the last 5 years. The Committee found that ACRs for the year 2008-09 and 2012-13 in respect of Sh. J.S. Rana are not available in his ACR dossiers and therefore, as per instructions of the Government, the Committee considered his ACRs for the preceding year i.e. 2006-07 and 2007-08.

5. After having examined his Annual Confidential Reports, the Committee found Sh.

Jagdish Singh Rana fit for promotion and assessed him as "Very Good".

6. The Committee then examined the integrity and Vigilance Clearance Certificate in respect of above officer and was satisfied that his integrity was not in doubt and no vigilance and departmental case was pending against him.

7. Based on the above assessment, the Committee, recommends the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution (Class-I) in the Department of Prosecution, Himachal Pradesh.

(M.R. Sharma) (Vijay Kumar Sharma) (P.Mitra) Director (Prosecution) (Home) Deputy Secretary (Home) Addl. Chief Secretary

___________

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE HELD ON 5.3.2014 AT 11.30 AM. IN THE OFFICE ROOM OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

Present:

1. Sh. P. Mitra

Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) …..Chairman.

2. Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma ……Member Deputy Secretary (Home)

3. Sh. M.R. Sharma ……Member Director (Prosecution)7638 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBLE OFFICERS FOR PROMOTION TO THE POST OF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLASS-I, GAZETTED) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

The Departmental Promotion Committee was informed that 26 posts of Deputy Distinct Attorneys (Class-I) Gazetted in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+5400 G.P. in the department of Prosecution are required to be filled up by promotion on the basis of selection. Out of which 1 post fell vacant in the year 2012, 14 in the year 2013, 1 in the year 2014 and 10 more are anticipated vacancies during the year 2014. The Committee was also informed that out of 26 vacancies, 2 vacancies have been caused due to posting of Deputy Distt. Attorneys in BBMB and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, New Delhi, on transfer/deputation basis. These are also long term vacancies and are required to be filled up on regular basis.

2. According to the notified provisions of R&P Rules, the post of Deputy District Attorney (Class-I) are required to be filled up by promotion from amongst the Assistant Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) with 7 years of service (including adhoc service, if any) in the grade on selection basis i.e. Merit-cum-seniority and the officers who are to be considered for promotion must have passed the Departmental Examination required under the provisions of R&P Rules. The Committee was informed that since these promotions are from Class-I to Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to the SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case as per rules/instructions of the Government.

3. The Committee examined the integrity and Vigilance Clearance Certificate in respect of above officers and was satisfied that their integrity was not in doubt and no vigilance and departmental case was pending against any of them.

4. Accordingly, the committee perused the seniority list supplied by the department and considered first 3 senior most eligible officers against 1 vacancy in the year 2012 and considered their ACRs. Then the Committee considered 2 left out from the zone of consideration of 2012 alongwith other left out eligible officers against the vacancies available in the year 2013 and 2014.

5. After having examined the Annual Confidential Reports and based on assessment (assessment sheet enclosed), the Committee, recommended, in order of merit, the following officers for promotion on year-wise basis to the posts of Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I) in Prosecution Department, Himachal Pradesh:—

Year-2012 (`1 vacancy)

1. Sh. Vijay Kumar

Year-2013 (14 vacancies)

1. Sh. Sanjeev Singh Rana 2. Sh. Vinod Bhardwaj 3. Sh. Narain Singh Chauhan 4. Sh. Bhisham Jawal Badresh Chand 5. Sh. Bhuvnesh 6. Sh. Kulbhushan Gautam 7. Sh. Sudeep Singh 8. Sh. Kapil Dev 9. Sh. Jitender Kumar 10. Sh. Umesh Kumar Sharma7639 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 11. Sh. Naveen Chander 12. Sh. Yash Pal Singh 13. Sh. Rajeshwar Dutt Sharma 14. Ms. Sheetal Bansal

Year-2014 (1 vacancy)

1. Smt. Champa Devi

Year-2014 (Resultant vacancies)

1. Sh. Sandeep Kumar 2. Sh. Eklavya 3. Sh. Devender Kumar 4. Sh. Sanjay Pandit

(M.R. Sharma) (Vijay Kumar Sharma) (P. Mitra) Director (Prosecution) Deputy Secretary (Home) Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) Himachal Pradesh to the Govt. of H.P. to the Govt. of H.P.

___________

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

COMMITTEE FOR PROMOTION TO THE POSTS OF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

(CLASS-I) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION

At present there are 42 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+5400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 30 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. S.P. office 03 5. PWD 04 6. Health 01

Total: 42

2. Beside above, one Dy. Distt. Attorney has been posted in Electricity Regulatory Comm., Delhi and one in BBMB, Nangal on deputation/transfer basis. In nutshell there are 44 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments/deputation post.

3. Out of above 44 posts, the department has filled up 28 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorney. Therefore, there are 16 clear cut vacancies. Besides, there will be 10 more resultant vacancies due to retirement/promotions during the year, 2014. In nut shell, there will be 26 vacancies in all i.e. 16 clear cut vacancies and 10 resultant vacancies. But at present there are only 20 Assistant District Attorneys eligible for promotion to the post of Deputy Distt. Attorney. Posts of Deputy Distt. Attorneys are vacant in following places:—

4. 5 Deputy District Attorneys are still working on the post of Asstt. Distt. Attorney on their promotion at Kinnaur, S.P. office, Una, Sirmour, TCP and Prisons.

5. The composition of Departmental Promotion Committee for consideration of eligible Deputy District Attorney for the post of Dsitt. Attorney (Class-I) in respect of Prosecution Department is as under:—

1. ACS/Pr. Secretary (Home) Chairman

2. Spl./Addl./Jt./Dy./under Secretary Member

(Home Prosecution)

3. Director (Prosecution) Member

6. Since the DPC shall consider the eligible officers for promotion against the year wise vacancies in accordance with the provisions of Rules/instructions, of the Govt., the year-wise position of vacancies of Deputy Distt. Attorney is indicated as under:—

1. 2012 1 posts Due to posting/ transfer of DDA in BBMB.

2. 2013 02 posts Due to retirement.

3. 2014 12 posts Due to promotion.

01 Due to creation of post in PWD 10 (anticipated due to creation/promotions)

7. According to the provisions of R&P Rules, the post of Deputy Distt. Attorney is a selection post and has been classified as Class-I post which is to be filed up by promotion from amongst Asstt. District Attorney (Class-I) having seven years regular service or combined with continuous adhoc service.

8. As per appended seniority list of Asstt. District Attorney, the detail of ADAs (in order of seniority) who have completed requisite service for promotion is as under:—

9. The ACRs of all eligible officers fulfilling the requirements of R&P Rules, Integrity Certificate and a copy of VCCs obtained from Vigilance Department are also enclosed for the perusal of DPC. It is pertinent to bring to the notice that the ACR for the year 2012-13 in respect of Smt. Chamba Devi is not available. The DPC is therefore, requested to consider the ACRs of said officer of proceeding year in terms of instructions of the DOP.

10. As per judgment of Hon'ble High Court in CWP No. 488/2001-V.K. Behal Vs. State regarding assigning of seniority list to Ex-serviceman, seniority list of Asstt. Dsitt. Attorney dated 17.01.1997 has been set aside and quashed, therefore, in the past promotions to the post of Deputy Distt. Attorneys were made on temporary basis.

11. It may also be added here that since these promotions shall be within Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case. The DPC may kindly consider the proposal and make suitable recommendations to the department in this regard.

By order, (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

ANNEXURE-II

INTEGRITY CERTIFICATE:

(a) Certified that no department case is pending or contemplated in respect of following officers and no intimation regarding Vigilance/Enforcement case against them has been received in the office from concerned department.

(b) Certified that these officers do not exist in the list of officers of doubtful integrity.

(c) Integrity of the following officers is also certified.

By order, (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (Prosecution)

No. Home (G)B(2)3/2013 Dated: Shimla-171002 the 4th December, 2013

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, is pleased to promote the following Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I, Gazetted) as District Attorney (Classs-I, Gazetted) in the pay scale Rs. 15600-39100+7400 G.P. with immediate effect:—

1. Sh. Ashok Kumar Sugyan 2. Smt. Monika Malhotra 3. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 4. Sh. Arvind Nadda 5. Sh. Nand Lal 6. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel 7. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 8. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan 9. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 10. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala 11. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 12. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan7643 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 As a sequel to the above promotions, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is further pleased to order the posting of these District Attorneys alongwith transfers/postings of other District Attorneys/Deputy District Attorneys in Prosecution Department with immediate effect in the public interest as under:—

1. The above officers will remain on probation for a period of two years and will be eligible to exercise option for the fixation of pay as District Attorney under FR 22 within a period of one month from the date of issue of this notification.

2. These promotions will be subject to the final outcome of SLP (C ) No. 8710 of 2009 R.K. Bharwal & others Versus State of H.P. & others.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

___________

(From pre-page)

N-14:—Presently posts of District Attorneys are vacant in the following places:—

1. Revenue, Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla 2. Kinnaur at Rampur 3. SV&ACB, D/Shala 4. SV&ACB, Mandi 5. Vigilance hqrs 6. Excise & Taxation 7. Education (Higher) 8. Education (Elementary) 9. Shimla 10. Hamirpur 11. Forest (O/o PCCF, Shimla)

In addition to above, on post of District Attorney is being proposed to be posted in Agriculture University, Palampur on secondment basis on request of said University.

In view of the above the office proposes the transfer/posting/adjustment of District Attorneys/Dy. Dsitt. Attorneys as under:—

An approved note from CMO has been received regarding adjustment of Sh. Arvind Kumar Nadda at Nahan, Dharamshala or BBMB, Nangal but no post of Distt. Attorney is vacant in these places and incumbents posted in these places have short stay of about one year or less than one year, therefore, Sh. Nadda is being proposed to be adjusted at Mandi, which is close to his native place.

Officers at S. No. 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12 have already been given the charge of Distt. Attorney/posted against the post of Distt. Attorney, therefore, their posting is being proposed at the same office/place of posting (except S. No. 2).

The Hon'ble Chief Minister has already approved the promotion of 12 Dy. Distt. Attorneys to the post of District Attorney at N-12. Now the Hon'ble Chief Minister may kindly be requested to approve the above proposal of postings of District Attorneys/Deputy District Attorneys please.

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (Prosecution)

No. Home (G) B (2)3/2013 Dated: Shimla-171002

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, is pleased to promote the following Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I, Gazetted) as District Attorney (Classs-I, Gazetted) in the pay scale Rs. 15600-39100+7400 G.P. with immediate effect:—

1. Sh. Ashok Kumar Sugyan 2. Smt. Monika Malhotra 3. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 4. Sh. Arvind Nadda 5. Sh. Nand Lal 6. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel 7. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 8. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan 9. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 10. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala 11. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 12. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan

The above officers will remain on probation for a period of two years and will be eligible to exercise option for the fixation of pay as District Attorney under FR-22 within a period of one month from the date of issue of this notification.

Posting orders of these officers will be issued separately.

These promotions will be subject to the final outcome of SLP (C) No. 8710 of 2009 R.K. Bharwal & others Versus State of H.P. & others.

By order, Sd.- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

_________

(From pre-page)

Presently posts of District Attorneys are vacant in the following places:—

Placed below at Flag-A are the minutes of the meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee held on 14.11.2013 for consideration of eligible District Attorneys for promotion to the posts of Joint Director, Prosecution. Presently two posts of Joint Directors, one each in the Police headquarters and Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla are vacant but only one officer namely Sh. Rajender Paul Kashav is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution as per the provisions of Recruitment and Promotion Rules. The Departmental Promotion Committee in its above meeting has recommended a name of Sh. Rajender Paul Kashav for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution.

Sh. Rajender Paul Kashav being senior most District Attorney has already been assigned the charge of Joint Director in Police Headquarters, Shimla. It is, therefore, proposed that said officer on promotion may be posted in the same place i.e. Police Headquarters, Shimla.

The Hon'ble Chief Minister, being Minister-in-Charge may kindly be requested to kindly approve the proceedings of the DPC meeting/promotion of Sh. Rajinder Pal Kashav to the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) and his posting in Police Headquarters please.

____________

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE HELD ON 14.11.2013 AT 4.00 P.M. AND ON 22.11.2013 AT 4.00 PM IN THE OFFICE ROOM OF THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

Present:

5. Sh. P. Mitra

Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) …..Chairman.

6. Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma ……Member Deputy Secretary (Home)

7. Sh. B.S. Pathania ……Member Director (Prosecution)

ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBLE OFFICERS FOR PROMOTION TO THE POST OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLASS-I, GAZETTED) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

The Departmental Promotion Committee was informed that 12 posts of Distinct Attorneys (Class-I) Gazetted in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+7400 G.P. in the department of Prosecution are required to be filled up by promotion on the basis of selection. Out of which 2 posts fell vacant in the year 2012, 10 in the year 2013 and 10 more are likely to be vacant during the year 2014. The Committee was also informed that out of 12 vacancies, 3 vacancies have been caused due to posting of Distt. Attorneys in SJVNL and PWD and proposed to be deployed in H.P. Krishi Vishvividlaya, Palampur, these are also log term vacancies and are required to be filled up on regular basis.

2. According to the notified provisions of R&P Rules, the post of District Attorney (Class-I) are required to be filled up by promotion from amongst the Dy. Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) with 5 years of service (including adhoc service, if any) in the grade on selection basis i.e. Merit- cum-seniority and the officers who are to be considered for promotion must have passed the Departmental Examination required under the provisions of R&P Rules. The Committee was informed that since these promotions shall be from Class-I to Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to the SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case as per rules/instructions of the Government.

3. Accordingly, the committee perused the seniority list supplied by the department and considered first 6 senior most eligible officer against 2 vacancies in the year 2012 and considered their ACRs. Then the Committee considered 4 left out from the zone of consideration of 2012 alongwith other 6 eligible officers against vacancies available in the year 2013.

4. Where-ever grading of 'Outstanding' was not supported/justified with specific details of outstanding work, the grading was reduced to 'Very Good'.

5. After having examined the Annual Confidential Reports, as mentioned above, the Committee assessed the officers on year-wise basis (assessment sheet enclosed) in order of seniority as under:—

Year-2012 (2 vacancies)

8. Sh. Ashok Kumar-I Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 9. Smt. Monika Malhotra Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 10. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 11. Sh. Arvind Nadda Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 12. Sh. Nand Lal Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 13. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" Year-2013 (10 Vacancies)

14. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 15. Sh. Arvind Nadda Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 16. Sh. Nand Lal Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 17. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 18. Sh. Giri Raj Singh Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 19. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 20. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 21. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 22. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 23. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan Found fit and assessed as "Very Good" 6. The Committee then examined the integrity and Vigilance Clearance Certificate in respect of above officers and was satisfied that his integrity was not in doubt and no vigilance and departmental case was pending against any of them.

7. Based on the above assessment, the Committee, recommends, in order of merit, the following officers for promotion to the posts of District Attorneys (Class-I) in Prosecution Department, Himachal Pradesh:—

Year-2012

1. Sh. Ashok Kumar Sugyan 2. Smt. Monika Malhotra

Year-2013

24. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 25. Sh. Arvind Nadda 26. Sh. Nand Lal 27. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel 28. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 29. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan 30. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 31. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala 32. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 33. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan

(B.S. Pathania) (Vijay Kumar Sharma) (P. Mitra) Director (Prosecution) Deputy Secretary (Home) Addl. Chief Secretary (Home)7649 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE

HELD ON 14.11.2013 AT 4.00 P.M. IN THE OFFICE ROOM OF THE ADDITIONAL

CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

Present:

4. Sh. P. Mitra

Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) …..Chairman.

5. Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma ……Member Deputy Secretary (Home)

6. Sh. B.S. Pathania ……Member Director (Prosecution)

ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBLE OFFICERS FOR PROMOTION TO THE

POST OF JOINT DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION) (CLASS-I, GAZETTED) IN

THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

The Departmental Promotion Committee was informed that one posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class-I) Gazetted in the pay scale of Rs. 15600- 39100+8400 G.P. in the department of Prosecution are required to be filed up by promotion on the basis of selection which have been caused due to promotion of Sh. B.S. Pathania, Joint Director as Director( Prosecution) in.

2. As per the notified provisions of Recruitment and Promotion Rules, the posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) are to be filled up by promotion from amongst the eligible District Attorneys on 'Selection basis' (Merit-cum-seniority) who have completed five years service as District Attorney (Including adhoc service.) The Committee was further informed that since these promotions shall be from Class-I to Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to the SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case as per rules/instructions of the Government.

3. The committee was also informed that at present there is only one District Attorney namely Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana who fulfills the said eligibility criteria of five years of service as District Attorney for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution. Therefore, the Committee only considered the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana, District Attorney for the post of Joint Director, Prosecution.

4. Accordingly, the committee perused the seniority list supplied by the department and considered the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana against the vacant post of Joint Director, Prosecution and considered his ACR's for the last 5 years. The Committee found that ACRs for the year 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Kashav are not available in his ACR dossiers and therefore, as per instructions of the Government, the Committee considered his ACRs for the preceding year i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06.

5. After having examined his Annual Confidential Reports, the Committee found Sh.

Jagdish Singh Rana fit for promotion and assessed him as "Very Good".

6. The Committee then examined the integrity and Vigilance Clearance Certificate in respect of above officer and was satisfied that his integrity was not in doubt and no vigilance and departmental case was pending against him.

7. Based on the above assessment, the Committee, recommends the name of Jagdish Singh Rana for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution (Class-I) in the Department of Prosecution, Himachal Pradesh.

(B.S. Pathania) (Vijay Kumar Sharma) (P. Mitra) Director (Prosecution) (Home) Deputy Secretary (Home) Addl. Chief Secretary

____________

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

COMMITTEE FOR PROMOTION TO THE POSTS OF JOINT DIRECTOR,

PROSECUTION (CLASS-I) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION

At present there are 7 posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+8400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution department. Out of these three posts are sanctioned in the department. Besides, this four posts of Joint Director have been sanctioned in other departments i.e. one each in Police Headquarters, Police Training Centre, Daroh, 2 in State Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau. Therefore, there are 7 posts of Joint Directors in Prosecution department.

2. Out of above 7 posts of Joint Director(Prosecution), the Department has already filled up 5 posts of Joint Director. Therefore, there are 2 clear cut vacancies of Joint Director, Prosecution. Five more vacancies of Joint Directors are anticipated during next one year owing the promotion/retirement.

3. The composition of Departmental Promotion Committee for consideration of eligible District Attorneys for the post of Joint Director (Class-I) in respect of Prosecution Department is as under:—

1. ACS/Pr. Secretary (Home) Chairman

2. Spl./Addl./Jt./Dy./under Secretary Member

(Home Prosecution)

3. Director (Prosecution) Member

4. According to the provisions R&P Rules, the post of Joint Director is a selection post and has been classified as Class-I post which is to be filed up by promotion from amongst District Attorney (Class-I) having five years regular service or combined with continuous adhoc service.

5. Both posts of Joint Directors have been fallen vacant during current year on 30.4.2013 and 21.6.2013 due to retirement of Sh. Rajinder Sharma and promotion of Sh. P.S. Pathania as Director, Prosecution. Therefore, the DPC is required to recommend a panel of 7 officers of promotion as Joint Director, Prosecution but at present only one Distt. Attorney namely Sh. R.P. Kashav, Distt. Attorney is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. Therefore, the remaining posts of Joint Director can be filled up by promotion, as and when eligible candidates amongst District Attorney will be available.

6. The ACRs of Sh. R.P. Kashav, Integrity Certificate and a copy of VCCs obtained from Vigilance Department are also enclosed for the perusal of DPC. It is pertinent to bring to the notice of the DPC that ACRs the for the year 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Kashav are not available. The DPC is therefore, requested to consider two ACRs of preceding years in terms of instructions of the Department of Personnel.

7. It may also be added here that since these promotions shall be within Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case. The DPC may kindly consider the name of Sh. R.P. Kashav for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution and make suitable recommendation to the department in this regard.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

File No. Home (G)B(2)3/2013

Subject:—Regarding promotion to the post of District Attorney.

At present there are 19 posts of Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600- 39100+7400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 14 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. Vigilance hqrs. 01

Beside above, posts of Law officers in the rank of Distt. Attorney has been created in other department viz. Education (Elementary). Education (Higher), Excise and Taxation and Forests. In addition to this, one Distt. Attorney has been posted in SJVN on deputation basis. In nutshell there are 24 posts of Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments/deputation post.

Out of above 24 posts, the department has filled up 16 posts of DA. Therefore, there are 8 clear cut vacancies. A part from these vacancies, one DA has been deployed in PWD, 2 DAs have been given a charge of Joint Director, Prosecution. In addition to above, a request has also been received from H.P. Krishi Vishvvidlya to post Law officer in said University in the rank of DA. In nut shell there are 12 clear cut vacancies of Distt. Attorney after taking into consideration these deputations/ secondment post. But at present there are only 12 DDAs eligible for promotion to the post of Distt. Attorney. The detail of vacancies is given as under:—

District Attorney

2. Revenue, Shimla 2. Rampur 12. SV&ACB, D/Shala 13. SV&ACB, Mandi 14. Vigilance hqrs 15. Excise & Taxation 16. Education (Higher) 17. Education (Elementary) 18. Shimla7652 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 19. Hamirpur 20. Forest 21. Agriculture University, Palampur.

In order to fill up these vacancies, matter is to be placed before DPC. Accordingly Memorandum for consideration of DPC has been prepared and placed below at Flag-X for favour of approval/signatures please. Dy. Secretary (Home) may kindly sign the Memorandum and integrity certificate in r/o eligible officers.

It is also submitted here that ACRs of following officers who are in the zone of consideration for promotions are not available/received in the department:—

The matter is submitted for perusal/orders as to whether we may consider the ACRs of above officers for preceding years or wait for some more time.

In view of the above position, if approved, worthy ACS(Home) may kindly be requested to give date and time for holding the DPC as per his convenience please.

___________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

File No. Home (G)B(2)4/2013

Subject:- Regarding promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution.

Presently two posts of Joint Director, Prosecution are vacant in the Department which are to be filled up by promotion from amongst Distt. Attorneys. Against these two vacancies senior most Distt. Attorney have been given charge of Joint Director. As per R&P Rules Dsitt. Attorneys having five years service are eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. But only one officer namely Sh. Rajinder Pal Kashav fulfill the eligibility criteria for promotion as per R&P Rules. In order to fill up vacancies, the mater is to be placed before the DPC. Accordingly Memorandum for consideration of DPC has been prepared and placed below at Flag-X for favour of approval/signatures please. Dy. Secretary (Home) may kindly sing the Memorandum and integrity certificate in r/o above officer.

It is also brought to the notice that ACRs of Sh. R.P. Kashav for the year 2006-07, 2007-08, 2010-11 and 2012-13 are not available. If approved, worthy ACS(Home) may kindly be requested to give date and time for holding the DPC as per his convenience please.

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

COMMITTEE FOR PROMOTION TO THE POSTS OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY

PROSECUTION (CLASS-I) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

At present there are 19 posts of Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600- 39100+7400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 14 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. Vigilance hqrs. 01

2. Beside above, posts of Law officers in the rank of Distt. Attorney has been created in other departments viz. Education (Elementary). Education (Higher), Excise and Taxation and Forests. In addition to this, one Distt. Attorney has been posted in SJVN on deputation basis. In nutshell there are 24 posts of Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments/deputation post.

3. Out of above 24 posts, the department has filled up 16 posts of DA. Therefore, there are 8 clear cut vacancies. A part from these vacancies, one DA has been deployed in PWD, 2 DAs have been given a charge of Joint Director, Prosecution. Since, only one Distt. Attorney is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director; therefore, one post of Jt. Director is proposed to be filled up by promotion and on other post senior most Distt. Attorney will continue to hold the charge of Joint Director. In addition to above, a request has also been received from H.P. Krishi Vishvvidlya to post Law officer in said University in the rank of DA. In nut shell there are 12 clear cut vacancies of Distt. Attorney after taking into consideration these deputations/ secondment post. But at present there are only 12 DDAs eligible for promotion to the post of Distt. Attorney. The detail of vacancies is given as under:—

1. Revenue, Shimla 2. Rampur 3. SV&ACB, D/Shala 4. SV&ACB, Mandi 5. Vigilance hqrs 6. Excise & Taxation 7. Education (Higher) 8. Education (Elementary) 9. Shimla 10. Hamirpur 11. Forest 12. Agriculture University, Palampur.

4. In addition to above clear-cut vacancies 10 more vacancies are anticipated upto 31.12.2014 owing the promotions/retirements.

5. The composition of departmental Promotion Committee for consideration of eligible District Attorney for the post of Joint Director (Class-I) in respect of Prosecution Department is as under:—

1. ACS/Pr. Secretary (Home) Chairman

2. Spl./Addl./Jt./Dy./under Secretary Member

(Home Prosecution)7654 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 3. Director (Prosecution) Member

6. Since the DPC shall consider the eligible officers for promotion against the year wise vacancies in accordance with the provisions of Rules/instructions, and both the posts of Joint Directors have been fallen vacant in current years as under:—

12 2012 2 posts Due to promotion.

2. 2013 6 posts Due to retirement,

2 posts Due to promotion (2 posts of JD are vacant) 1 post Due to posting of DA in PWD 1 post As per demand of HP. Agr. University,

Palampur.

7. According to the provisions of R&P Rules, the post of Distt. Attorney is a selection post and has been classified as Class-I post which is to be filed up by promotion from amongst Deputy District Attorney (Class-I) having five years regular service or combined with continuous adhoc service.

8. As per appended seniority list of Dy. District Attorney, the detail of DDAs (in order of seniority) who have completed requisite service for promotion is as under:—

9. The ACRs of all eligible officers fulfilling the requirements of R&P Rules, integrity Certificate and a copy of VCCs obtained from Vigilance Department are also enclosed for the perusal of DPC. It is pertinent to bring to the notice that the ACRs for the year 2012-13 in respect of Sh. S.S. Pathania, 2010-11 in r/o Sh. Arvind Nadda, 2011-12 & 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Nand Lal, 2011-12 in respect of Sh. Giri Raj, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Sunil Kuthiala and 2011-12 & 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Jagdish Knawar is not available. The DPC is therefore, requested to consider the ACRs of these officers of proceeding years in terms of instruction of the DOP.

10. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania (S.No.2) is an ex-serviceman. He was assigned seniority under rule 5(1) Demobilized Armed Forces Personal Rules, 1972 in entry grade (in the post of ADA). The Hon'ble High Court of HP has held rule 5(1) as unconstitutional. However, the Hon'ble Apex Court has ordered to maintained status quo in the matter of Ex-serviceman till further order. DOP has also issued directions in this regard that neither any further benefit may be allowed under the provisions of rules ibid to ex-serviceman nor the benefits already granted may be withdrawn. This status quo will be applicable from 16.3.2009. The case of Sh. Pathania has also been taken up with DOP separately for the advice, therefore, DPC may consider his name for promotion However orders will be issued after clarification is received from DOP.

11. It may also be added here that since these promotions shall be within Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case. The DPC may kindly consider the proposal and make suitable recommendation to the department in this regard.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

COMMITTEE FOR PROMOTION TO THE POSTS OF JOINT DIRECTOR

(PROSECUTION).

At present there are 7 posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+8400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution department. Out of these thee posts are sanctioned in the department. Besides, this four posts of Joint Director have been sanctioned in other department i.e. one each in Police Headquarters, Police Training Centre, Daroh, 2 in State Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau. Therefore, there are 7 posts of Joint Directors in Prosecution department.

2. Out of above 7 posts of Joint Director, Prosecution, the Department has already filed up 5 posts of Joint Director. Therefore, there are 2 clear cut vacancies of Joint Director, Prosecution. Five more vacancies of Joint Directors are anticipated during next one year owing the promotion/retirement.

3. The composition of departmental Promotion Committee for consideration of eligible District Attorney for the post of Joint Director (Class-I) in respect of Prosecution Department is as under:—

1. ACS/Pr. Secretary (Home) Chairman 2. Spl./Addl./Jt./Dy./under Secretary Member7656 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 (Home Prosecution)

3. Director (Prosecution) Member

4. According to the R&P Rules, the post of Joint Director is a selection post and has been classified as Class-I post which is to be filed up by promotion from amongst District Attorney (Class-I) having five years regular service or combined with continuous adhoc service.

5. Both posts of Joint Director have been filled vacant during current year on 30.4.2013 and 21.6.2013 due to retirement of Sh. Rajinder Sharma and due to promotion of Sh. P.S. Pathania as Director, Prosecution. Therefore, the DPC is required to recommend a panel of 7 officers of promotion as Joint Director, Prosecution but at present only one Distt. Attorney namely Sh. R.P. Kashav, Distt. Attorney is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. Therefore, the remaining posts of JD can be filled up by promotion as and when eligible candidates amongst DAs will be available.

6. The ACRs of Sh. R.P. Kashav, Integrity Certificate and a copy of VCCs obtained from Vigilance Department are also enclosed for the perusal of DPC. It is pertinent to bring to the notice that the ACRs for the year 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2012-13 in respect of Sh. Kashav are not available. The DPC is therefore, requested to consider two ACRS of proceeding years in terms of instruction of the DOP.

7. It may also be added here that since these promotions shall be within Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case. The DPC may kindly consider the name of Sh. R.P. Kashav for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution and make suitable recommendation to the department in this regard.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

File No. Home (G)B(14)6/11-L Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Home (G)

Dy. No. 52633260/13-PUC-I

Dy. No. 52637769/13-PUC-II

PUC-I-II:—These representations have been received from Sh.Sanjay Chauhan and Sh. Nand Lal, Deputy Distt. Attorney against the promotion of Exserviceman. They have submitted that CWP No. 488/2001-V.K. Behal and others Vs State of HP was filed by petitioner (Non-Ex-servicemen) in the Hon'ble High Court of HP wherein validity of the Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of vacancies in H.P. State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972 was challenged. Said petitioner was finally decided on 29th December, 2008 and the provision of Rule 5(i) of said rules was declared to be un-constitutional in so far as they give benefit counting the past Military service towards seniority in civil employment in the case of Ex-serviceman. Thereafter, the respondents (Ex-servicemen) having felt aggrieved of the aforesaid judgment invoked the jurisdiction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by filing SLP (Civil) No. 8710 of 2009 which is still pending. The Hon'ble Supreme court of India has ordered to maintained status quo as on 16.3.2009 and not stayed the operation of aforesaid judgment of Hon'ble High court of H.P., therefore, Rule 5(i) of7657 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (Reservation of vacancies in H.P. State Non Technical Services) Rules, 1972 does not exists at present. The above legal proposition has already been clarified and set a rest by the DOP vide letter dated 17.5.2013. As per orders of Apex Court and directions of Govt. the position as on the date of passing the interim orders has to be maintained and neither any further benefit may be allowed under the provision of rule rules ibid nor the benefits already granted may be withdrawn. This status quo will be applicable w.e.f. 16.2009 in their cases.

Furthermore the Hon'ble High Court of H.P. vide orders dated 14.8.2013 in CWP No. 4070 of 209-H has directed that no proposal for promotion will be considered or taken forward. After the passing the orders on 16.3.2009. If same has been extended even by mistake same deserves to be withdrawn immediately being without any law full authority. They have further submitted that the Govt. has promoted some of Attorney/Prosecutors after putting service only three years by giving they benefit of rule 5(i) whereas said rule was already declared as unconstitutional by the Hon'ble High court. Therefore said ex-servicemen could have been considered for promotion after putting in service of seven years as per R&P Rules and code of criminal procedure 1974. They have therefore requested to obtain the opinion of DOP whether benefit given by the Govt. to such ex- servicemen after passing the status qua order dated 16.3.2009 is liable to be withdraw.

In this behalf it is submitted that ADA is a lowest rung post in the cadre of Prosecutors/Attorneys, as such ex-servicemen are given the benefit of rule 5(1) of rule ibid on the post of ADA. One ADA namely Sh. S.S. Pathania was promoted temporarily to the post of Dy. Distt. Attorney on 17.5.2007 and his promotion was regularized on 25.8.2009. In addition to this Department has promoted three exservicemen from Asstt. Distt. Attorney to Deputy Distt. Attorney in the year 2010. Some Deputy District Attorney (Ex-servicemen) were also promoted to the post of Distt. Attorney after 16.3.2009. These officers have been promoted on temporary basis subject to the final outcome of above court cases.

In view of the above, we may refer the case to DOP-II for clarification regarding action to be taken in the cases of promotions made after 16.3.2009 in the cadre of Dy. Distt. Attorney (from ADAs lowest rung post) and Distt. Attorney and also in the case of Sh. S.S. Pathania, DDA. It may also be clarified as to whether promotions cannot be made in the cases of posts being filled up by promotion from lowest rung post only or in other cases also where officers (Ex-serviceman) fulfill the service criteria as per R&P Rules in the feeder category pleases.

___________

File No. Home (G)B(14)6/11 Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Home (G)

From

The Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh

To

Shri Vijay Kumar, Assistant District Attorney, Indora, Distt. Kangra (HP).

Subject:—Representation in connection with ignoring promotion.

Memo:

I am directed to refer to your representation dated 10.9.2012 on the subject cited above and to say that as per R&P Rules posts of Deputy District Attorney are filled up by promotion from7658 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 amongst ADAs on merit-cumseniority basis. Your ACRs for the year 2006-07 and 2007-08 were assessed as "Average" and "Poor" respectively by the Accepting Authority. The Departmental Promotion Committee in its meeting held on 15.3.2012 upgraded your ACRs for 2006-07 and 2007-08 and assessed as "Good". Your overall assessment was also as "Good" on the basis of ACRs of five years, whereas other junior officers including Sh. Chander Shekhar Bhatia and Smt. Ritu Malik were assessed as "Very Good" by the DPC.

Since junior officers were assessed over you in the merit prepared by the DPC on the basis of ACRs as such they superseded you resulting your name was not recommend for promotion to the post of Deputy Distt. Attorney.

In view of the above facts and circumstance your representation is here by rejected being devoid of merit.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

_________

File No. Home(G)B(2)2/13-L Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Home (G)

Subject:—Assigning of charge of higher post to Prosecutors.

Dy. No.52676607/13-PUC.

PUC:— Placed below is a representation of Sh. S.S. Pathania, Dy. Distt. Attorney for consideration for promotion/placement as per the seniority. He has submitted that in the year 2008 Hon'ble High Court vide its judgment dated 29.12.2008 in CWP No. 488/2001 had struck down the Rule 5(1) of the Demobilized Armed Force Personnel (Non Technical Service) Rules, 1972 as unconstitutional. Accordingly to said judgment dated 29.12.2008 was challenged by other appellants including by him before Hon'ble Apex court in special leave Petition and Hon'ble Apex Court has passed interim order that status quo may be maintained till further order. Due to these orders other appellants were promoted in due course and presently applicant is due to be considered for promotion/placement in the department of Prosecution.

In this behalf, it is submitted that presently there is a ban on promotions in the State. Keeping in view the shortage of Distt. Attorneys, specially in the Districts, the department assigned work of Distt. Attorney to three senior most Deputy Distt. Attorney ignoring Sh. S.S. Pathania who is at S.No.2 of seniority list. Sh. Pathania is an ex-serviceman and was appointed under Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (reservation of Vacancies in Himachal State Non-technical Services) Rules, 1972 in the year 2003. He was promoted as Deputy Dsitt. Attorney on 17.5.2007. His name for assigning of charge of higher post was not considered in view of directions issued by DOP vide letter dated 17th May, 2013 in the light of order of Hon'ble Apex Court. It has been clarified by DOP that in the case of Ex-serviceman Status quo may be maintained till further directions and this status quo will be applicable from 16.3.2009. They have further clarified that neither any further benefit may be allowed to ex-servicemen under Demobilized Armed Forces Personnel (reservation of Vacancies in Himachal State Non-technical Services) Rules, 1972 nor benefit already granted may be withdrawn.

In view of the above, matter may be referred to DOP-II for advising as to whether Sh. S.S. Pathania or other similar exserviceman can be consider for assigning of charge of higher post and for promotion also.

Dy.No. 52659766/13-PUC-I Dy.No. 52657842/13-PUC-II N-17:—Discussed. District Attorney posted in Distt. Hamirpur and Bilaspur are retiring on 30.9.2013. In view of changed situation/vacancies is Districts and keeping in view the recommendation of CMO/requests, office proposes the posting of Distt. Attorneys/Dy. Dist. Attorneys on assigning the charge of Jt. Director/ Distt. Attorney as under:—

In addition to above, Sh. Atma Ram, DDA, Shimla may be posted in Labour Court, Shimla in place of S.No.11 as proposed at N-13. Sh. Satpal Garg, DDA, Kangra at Dharmshala may be given additional charge of Dy. Distt. Attorney, Labour Court D/Shala in addition to his own duties.

Submitted please.

__________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

Filel No. Home(G)B(2)2/13

Subject:—Assigning of charge of higher post to Prosecutors.

Dy. No.52613560/13-PUC.

At present there are 20 posts of Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 15 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. Vigilance hqrs. 01

Beside above, posts of Law officers in the rank of Distt. Attorney has been created in other department viz. Education (Elementary). Education (Higher), Excise and Taxation and Forests. In addition to this, one Distt. Attorney has been posted in SJVN on deputation basis. In nutshell there are 25 posts of Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments/deputation post.

Out of above 25 posts, the department has filled up 17 posts of DAs and one DA has been deployed in PWD. Now there are clear cut 8 vacant posts of DA the detail of which is given as under:—

District Attorney

13. Distt. Attorney (Revenue) 2. Distt. Attorney, Directorate (Legal Cell, New Delhi)

13 SV&ACB, D/Shala 14 DA (Vigilance) hqrs 15 Excise & Taxation 16 Education (Higher) 17 Shimla 18 Forest7661 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 In addition to above, a request has also been received from H.P. Krishi Vishvvidlya to post Law officer in said University. Further C.I.D. has also submitted that there is a provision of attachment of Law officer in the rank of Joint Director (Prosecution) exclusively to assist and aid the officers/IOs of the State CID on the legal aspect in the HP Police Act. One post of Joint Director has fallen vacant in Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla due to retirement of Sh. L.S. Negi, DA who was holding the charge of Jt. Director w.e.f. 31.8.2013. Therefore, 2 posts of Jt. Director and 11 posts of DA (9 clear cut and 2 resultant) are available if we consider the matter for filling up of posts in KVV, Palampur and CID. Beside this, Distt. Attorney, Bilaspur and Hamirpur shall retired on 30.9.2013, as such 13 vacancies of Distt. Attorney will be available after 30.9.2013 but only 11 Dy. Distt. Attorneys are eligible for the post of District Attorneys as per R&P Rules which provide five years requisite service as DDA for promotion to the post of DA.

Copy of seniority list of DDA and DA is placed at annexure-A & B below. The detail of senior most 2 Distt. Attorneys and 11 eligible Distt. Attorneys are given as under:—

Distt. Attorney

3. Sh. J.S. Rana 4. Sh. J.K. Lakhanpal

Dy. Distt. Attorney

1. Smt. Monika Malhotra 2. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 3. Sh. Arvind Nadda 4. Sh. Nand Lal 5. Sh. Jagdish Chandel 6. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 7. Sh. Mohinder Singh Chauhan 8. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 9. Sh. Suneel Kuthiala 10. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 11. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan

It is submitted that DDA namely Sh. Giri Raj Singh, Mohinder Chauhan, Kulbir Chauhan, Surinder Negi and Sanjeev Katoch have been posted against the post of DA(Rev), Excise & Taxation, Vig. Hqrs (addl. Charge), Education (Higher) and SV&ACB, Dharamshala respectively. As per R&P Rules three years service as Distt. Attorney is required for promotion to the post of Joint Director and five years service as Dy. Distt. Attorney for the post of Distt. Attorney.

As per instructions issued by DOP on 11.1.2013 in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 7.1.2013 issued in IA No. 6/2012 in Special Leave to Appeal the State Government has been restrained for making any promotion.

Sh. J.K. Lakhanpal (Sr. No.2 in the list of DA) is working as DA, Mandi. Proposals have been received from CMO's office not to shift him from Mandi. Since no promotion can be made, therefore, it is proposed that one senior most Distt. Attorney, Sh. J.S. Rana, DA, Education may be given a charge of Jt. Director (Prosecution) and in order to cope up the work of CID, additional charge of CID may be entrusted of Jt. Director (SV&ACB), Shimla, Sh. V.K. Chaudhary. In order to fill up the posts of Distt. Attorney all eligible 10 DDA (excluding Sh. Surinder Pathania, E/M) may be appointed to officiate in the higher post of Distt. Attorney.

It is also submitted that there is noting adverse against above officer from valance angle and their integrity is not in double. No departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against these officers.

The above officers on assigning the charge of higher posts may be posed as under:—

In addition to above, HPPTCL has requisitioned services of one DDA and approved note was also received from the O/o Hon'ble Chief Minister regarding posting of Sh. Surinder Negi, DDA, presently posted in Higher Education in HPPTCL. It is therefore proposed that Sh. Negi may be posted in HPPTCL, Shimla. Further Sh. Atma Ram, DDA, Shimla may be posted in Labour Court, Shimla in place of S. No.11. Sh. Ram Dev Chaudhary, DDA, Kangra at Dharmshala may be given additional charge of Dy. Distt. Attorney, Labour Court D/Shala in addition to his own duties.

Submitted please.

________

Dy.No.52637805/13 PUC PUC:—The Chief Minister's office vide U.O. note under reference has forwarded a copy of letter from Ms. Manu Sharma, Member, H.P. Pollution Control Board regarding extension in service in favour of Sh. Narain Singh, Distt. Attorney, Kullu. It has been desired to examine the proposal and put-up on departmental file for kind perusal/orders of Hon'ble Chief Minister.

It has been submitted in the above letter that Sh. N.S. Verma will retire from service after attaining the age of superannuation on 30.8.2013. He is an Ex-Army Man and performing his duties very honesty, efficiently and diligently, therefore, it has been requested that extension in the service7663 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 period of said DA as per rules and as already has been done in favour of certain Distt. Attorneys in H.P. taking into consideration the acute shortage of DA in H.P.

In this behalf, it is submitted that Sh. N.S. Verma, Distt. Attorney, Kullu was appointed as Asstt. Distt. Attorney in the department on 16th September, 1996. He is an Ex-serviceman. He shall retire from Govt. service on 31.8.2013 after attaining the age of superannuation. The department has granted extension in service to only one officers namely Sh. Yash Pal Negi, DDA for one month's only on the ground that increment of Sh. Yash Pal Negi was due on the next day of his retirement.

With above position, matter may kindly be submitted for perusal/orders if any of Hon'ble Chief Minister w.r.t. U.O. note under reference please.

_________

Dy.No.52590554/13 PUC Dy.No.52586829/13 PUC Dy.No.52583303/13 PUC PUCs:—The Director, Prosecution vide letter under reference as forwarded an application of Sh. Shamsher Singh, Distt. Attorney, Bilaspur, H.P. for the grant of extension of period of service for one month and on day till 1.11.2013. Said DA has submitted that as per service record his dated of increment is due in the month of November and his superannuation retirement date is 30.9.2013 and if he retired on 30.9.2013 in that event he would face financial hardship as he will be deprived of benefit of one increment in his retirement benefits forever despite the fact that his next annual increment is fallen due on 1st November, 2013 & he shall have already completed 11 months for earning next increment on 30.9.2013, therefore, he has requested that his request for extension in service for a month & one day i.e. till 1.11.2013 may be considered under the provisions of relevant rules instructions of the Govt.

In this behalf, it is submitted that Sh. Shamsher Singh was appointed as APP in the department on 15.11.1986. He will retire from Govt. service on 30.9.2013 after attaining the age of superannuation. The department recently granted extension in service for one month upto 31/8/2013 in favour of Sh. Yash Pal Negi, DDA. Increment of Sh. Yash Pal Negi was due on the next day of his retirement.

With above position, request of Sh. Shamsher Singh, Distt. Attorney, Bilaspur is submitted for consideration please.

_________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

No. Home(Prose)B(14)7/2011 Dated, Shimla-171002, the 11th July, 2013.

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order that Shri L.S. Negi, District Attorney, Shimla shall hold the charge of the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) in the Directorate of Prosecution with immediate effect and till further orders.

The said officer shall not be entitled for any extra remuneration or any service claim for the additional duties.

The above officer is directed to submit the report of charge assumption to this department immediately.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

__________

One post of Joint Director (Prosecution) is vacant in the Directorate of Prosecution. As per R&P Rules the post of Joint Director is required to be filled up on selection basis from amongst Distt. Attorneys. As per instructions issued by DOP in the light of orders of Hon'ble High Court, the State Govt. has been restrained for making any promotion. Since no promotion can be made, therefore, this department recently gave a charge of one post of Joint Director (PHQ) and two posts DAs at headquarters and Rampur to senior most officers in their feeder categories as per N-95 and 97.

Sh. L.S. Negi, presently posted as Distt. Attorney, Shimla is a seniormost Distt. Attorney in the department who can be given a charge of Joint Director (headquarters). So far as the posting of DA in Shimla is concerned, it is proposed that either Sh. L.S. Negi may be ordered to hold the additional charge of DA, Shimla or Smt. Monika Malhotra who is a senior most Dy. Distt. Attorney in the feeder category of DA and presently posted as such at Kullu be given a charge of DA, Shimla.

Submitted please.

___________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

No. LLR-B(3)1/91 Dated, Shimla-171002, the 29th June, 2013.

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in exercise of the powers vested in her under Rule-56 of the Fundamental Rules as amended from time to time, is pleased to grant extension in service in favour of Sh. Yashpal Singh Negi, Dy. Distt. Attorney, presently holding the charge of District Attorney, Kinnaur at Rampur for a period of one month upto 31.7.2013.

By order, Sd/- (Tarun Shridhar) Principal Secretary (Home).

_________

Dy.No.52318975/13 PUC-I. Dy.No.52309085/13 PUC-II Dy.No.52316029/13 PUC-III.

PUC-I-III:—The Director (Prose) vide letter under reference has forwarded copy of representation of Sh. Vijay Kumar, ADA, Indora regarding ignoring promotion. Said ADA has submitted that that he being at S.No 4 in seniority was ignored promotion whereas his juniors Sh. Chander Shekhar Bhatia and Smt. Ritu Malik have been promoted. His ACR for the last 5 years were downgraded same should have been communicated to him but no such communication given to him. Moreover copies of ACRs were not supplied to him as per provisions. He has also furnished a detail be percent of success of court cases conduced by him and has requested that his representation may be considered to relive him from mental pressure.

In this behalf, it is submitted that meeting of DPC for filling up of vacant posts of DDA was held on 15.3.2012(Copy F/A). As per R&P Rules posts of DDAs are required to be filled up 100% by promotion from amongst ADAs on merit-cum-seniority basis. His juniors including Sh. Chander Shekhar Bhatia and Smt. Ritu Malik were assessed over Sh. Vijay Kumar in merit prepared by the DPC on the basis of ACRs and as such they superseded him, resulting the name of Sh. Vijay Kumar was not recommended for promotion by DPC. So far as communication of ACRs for last five years as submitted by applicant is concerned, it is submitted that only adverse entries were communicated to officer in the past. In the case of application, there were no adverse entries in the ACRs and therefore it was not required to be communicated to him but now as per instruction of DOP dated 7.3.2011 copies of ACRs are being sent to concerned officer.

In view of the above, Sh. Vijay Kumar was not recommended by the DPC on the basis of assessment made by it on the basis of ACRs and superseded by his juniors, therefore his representation is devoid of merit and may be rejected.

Dy.No.52567167/13 P-115-116.

Page-115-116:—Sh. Yashpal Singh through this representation has submitted that a panel of DDA for promotion to the post of Distt. Attorney has been drawn by Departmental Promotion Committee amongst he senior most Dy. Distt. Attorneys in the month of September, 2012. The panel was also formed on the basis of seniority List amongst the eligible DDAs and the validity of the said panel had already been elapsed. He was shown and still at Sr. No. 2 in order of seniority list to be considered for the for the post of Distt. Attorney. Singnificantly he is scheduled to attain the age of superannuation on 30th June, 2013 without getting any promotion due to stay on promotions imposed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He has further submitted that in normal course his date of next increment in the existing grade is 1st July, 2013 but due to date of his retirement on superannuation just a day before his date of next annual increment, he shall be deprived of benefit of one increment in his retrial benefit for ever, therefore, he has requested for extension in service for a month under the provisions of relevant rules/instructions of the Govt.

In this behalf, it is submitted that DPC for promotion to the post of DA was held in the month of August, 2012 wherein vacancies upto 31.12.2012 were taken into account. The performance of Sh. Negi was graded as "Good" and thus he was superseded by his junior. But these orders could not be issued due to stay of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the validity of panel so prepared has also been elapsed. Presently there are 8 vacancies in the cadre of DA. Keeping in view stay on promotions and requirement of DAs, this department assigned charge of higher post to two senior most Distt. Attorneys and Sh. Yashpal Negi (SN.o.2 in Seniority list of DDA) has been given the charge of Distt. Attorney Rampur vide notification dated 24.6.2013. Sh. Negi shall retire from Govt. service on 30.6.2013 and his date of increment is 1.7.2013.

It is further submitted that similar case of one Sh. Mohinder Singh Chauhan (retied on 30.12.2012) was examined but his request was not acceded to on the ground that it will create a precedent in future. But in other similar case, Sh. Jawahar Lal Sharma Director(Prosecution), was7666 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 given one day extension by Department of Personnel with the concurrence of Hon'ble Chief Justice of India (Copy at F/A).

With above position, request of Sh. Yashpal Singh Negi, DDA is submitted for consideration please.

__________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

No. Home(Prose)B(14)7/2011 Dated, Shimla-171002, the 24th June, 2013.

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order that the following District Attorney and Deputy District Attorneys shall hold the additional charge of the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) and District Attorney with immediate effect and till further orders:—

The said officers shall not be entitled for any extra remuneration or any service claim for the additional duties.

The above officers are directed to submit the report of charge assumption to this department immediately.

By order, Sd/- Principal Secretary (Home).

__________

(From pre-page)

At present there are 20 posts of Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 15 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. Vigilance hqrs. 01

Beside above, posts of Law officers in the rank of Distt. Attorneys have been created in other department viz. Education (Elementary). Education (Higher), Excise and Taxation, MPP &7667 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 Power, Forests and Health Department. In nutshell there are 26 posts of Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments.

Out of above 26 posts, the department has filled up 17 posts of DAs and one DA has been posted in PWD. Now there are clear cut 8 vacant posts of DA the detail of which is given as under:—

District Attorney

19 Distt. Attorney (Revenue) 20 Distt. Attorney, Legal Cell, New Delhi 21 Rampur 22 DA (Vigilance) 23 Excise & Taxation 24 MPP & Power 25 Education (Higher) 26 Health

It is submitted that DDA namely Sh. Giri Raj Singh, Mohinder Chauhan, Kulbir Chauhan, Surinder Negi and D.S. Pramar have been posted against the post of DA(Rev), Excise & Taxation, MPP & Power, Education (Higher) and Health Department respectively. In addition to this Sh. Kulbir Chauhan, DDA has also been given additional charge of DA(Vig.) and Legal Cell. New Delhi. In addition to this a post of Legal Advisor in the rank of Joint Director (P) is also vacant in Police headquarters. Requests are being received from Police Deptt. to posts Legal Advisor time and again, therefore, a senior most Dist. Attorney, namely Sh. R.P. Kashav posted in the Directorate of Prosecution can be posted as Legal Advisor in Police Headquarters, Shimla.

In view of above, we have made arrangement by posting of officer of feeder categories in almost places except in the Court of Distt. & Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur and also in Directorate/PHQ.

As per instructions issued by DOP on 11.1.2013 in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 7.1.2013 issued in IA No. 6/2012 in Special Leave to Appeal the State Government has been restrained for making any promotion. Since no promotion can be made, therefore, it is proposed that two senior most Dy. Distt. Attorneys Sh. Ashok Kumar, DDA, PWD, Dharamshala and Sh. Yashpal Negi, DDA, Mandi may be appointed to officiate in the higher post of Distt Attorney.

It is also submitted that there is nothing adverse against above officer from valance angle and their integrity is not in double. No departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against these officers.

In view of above, Sh. Ashok Kumar, DDA may be given charge of Distt. Attorney in Directorate in place of Sh. R.P. Kashav who may be posted on the post of JD (being senior most) in PHQ and Sh. Yash Pal Negi may be given charge of Distt. Attorney Rampur.

N-94-97:—As per N-94, Sh. R.P. Kashav, Sh. Ashok Kumar and Sh. Yashpal Singh Negi was to be given charge of higher post in other district but inadvertently in the notification regarding assigning of charge to these officers, they have been stated to be given additional charge of higher post which is not practically feasible. whereas they have to be given change of higher post relinquishing the charge of present post held by them Therefore, we may, issue corrigendum regarding deleting the word "Additional" appearing in 2nd line and in column No.3 against officer at S.No. 1 in our notification dated 24th June, 2013 as per draft (in fair) placed below for favour of approval/signatures please.

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (G)

No. Home(Prose)B(14)7/2011 Dated, Shimla-171002, the 24th June, 2013.

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order that the following District Attorney and Deputy District Attorneys shall hold the additional charge of the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) and District Attorney with immediate effect and till further orders:—

The said officers shall not be entitled for any extra remuneration or any service claim for the additional duties.

The above officers are directed to submit the report of charge assumption to this department immediately.

By order, Sd/- Principal Secretary (Home).

_________

(From pre-page)

At present there are 20 posts of Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 15 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. Vigilance hqrs. 01

Beside above, posts of Law officers in the rank of Distt. Attorneys have been created in other department viz. Education (Elementary). Education (Higher), Excise and Taxation, MPP & Power, Forests and Health Department. In nutshell there are 26 posts of Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments.

Out of above 26 posts, the department has filled up 17 posts of DAs and one DA has been posted in PWD. Now there are clear cut 8 vacant posts of DA the detail of which is given as under:—

District Attorney 3. Distt. Attorney (Revenue)7669 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 4. Distt. Attorney, Legal Cell, New Delhi 5. Rampur 6. DA (Vigilance) 7. Excise & Taxation 8. MPP & Power 9. Education (Higher) 10. Health

It is submitted that DDA namely Sh. Giri Raj Singh, Mohinder Chauhan, Kulbir Chauhan, Surinder Negi and D.S. Pramar have been posted against the post of DA(Rev), Excise & Taxation, MPP & Power, Education (Higher) and Health Department respectively. In addition to this Sh. Kulbir Chauhan, DDA has also been given additional charge of DA(Vig.) and Legal Cell. New Delhi. In addition to this a post of Legal Advisor in the rank of Joint Director (P) is also vacant in Police headquarters. Requests are being received from Police Deptt. to posts Legal Advisor time and again, therefore, a senior most Dist. Attorney, namely Sh. R.P. Kashav posted in the Directorate of Prosecution can be posted as Legal Advisor in Police Headquarters, Shimla.

In view of above, we have made arrangement by posting of officer of feeder categories in almost places except in the Court of Distt. & Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur and also in Directorate/PHQ.

As per instructions issued by DOP on 11.1.2013 in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 7.1.2013 issued in IA No. 6/2012 in Special Leave to Appeal the State Government has been restrained for making any promotion. Since no promotion can be made, therefore, it is proposed that two senior most Dy. Distt. Attorneys Sh. Ashok Kumar, DDA, PWD, Dharamshala and Sh. Yashpal Negi, DDA, Mandi may be appointed to officiate in the higher post of Distt Attorney.

It is also submitted that there is noting adverse against above officer from valance angle and their integrity is not in double. No departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against these officers.

In view of above, Sh. Ashok Kumar, DDA may be given charge of Distt. Attorney in Directorate in place of Sh. R.P. Kashav who may be posted on the post of JD (being senior most) in PHQ and Sh. Yash Pal Negi may be given charge of Distt. Attorney Rampur.

_________

(From overleaf)

N-74 onwards:—The Law department has advised to decide the representation of Sh. Vijay Kumar, ADA at our level. It is submitted that ACRs of above officer for the year 2006-07 and 2007-08 were assessed as "Average" and "Poor" by Accepting authority on the basis of his convection rate. However, it was decided by the Govt. that convection should not be a sole criteria for writing/evaluating the ACRs of Prosecutor of Prosecution Department. In view of these instructions, the DPC upgraded the ACRs of above ADA for the period 2006-07 and 2007-08 and assessed as "Good". ACR dossier of Sh. Vijay Kumar is also placed below for perusal.

With above position, representation of Sh. Vijay Kumar, ADA is submitted for consideration/order please.

Presently two posts of Joint Director, Prosecution are vacant in the Department which are to be filled up by promotion from amongst Distt. Attorneys.

Against these two vacancies senior most Distt. Attorney have been given charge of Joint Director. As per R&P Rules Dsitt. Attorneys having five years service are eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. But only one officer namely Sh. Rajinder Pal Kashav fulfill the eligibility criteria for promotion as per R&P Rules. In order to fill up vacancies, the mater is to be placed before the DPC. Accordingly Memorandum for consideration of DPC has been prepared and placed below at Flag-X for favour of approval/signatures please. Dy. Secretary (Home) may kindly sing the Memorandum and integrity certificate in r/o above officer.

It is also brought to the notice that ACRs of Sh. R.P. Kashav for the year 2006-07, 2007-08, 2010-11 and 2012-13 are not available.

__________

ANNEXURE-II

(Vide item No. 11 of the Performa)

CERTIFIED:

(d) That there is nothing adverse against the following officers from the vigilance angle and their integrity is not in doubt.

(e) That none of the following officers is under suspension;

(f) That no departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against the following officers.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

___________

ANNEXURE-II

(Vide item No. 11 of the Performa)

CERTIFIED:

(a) That there is nothing adverse against Sh. R.P. Kashav, Distt. Attorney from the vigilance angle and his integrity is not in doubt.

(b) That Sh. R.P. Kashav is not under suspension;

(c) That no departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against above officer.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

____________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (Prosecution)

No. Home (G)B(2)4/2013 Dated: Shimla-171002

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, is pleased to promote Shri Rajender Paul Kashav, District Attorney (Class-I, Gazetted) to the post of Joint Director (Class-I, Gazetted) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+8400 G.P. with immediate effect.

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is further pleased to post Sh. Rajender Paul Kashav as Joint Director, Police Headquarters, Shimla.

The above officer will remain on probation for a period of two years and will be eligible to exercise option for the fixation of pay as Joint Director under FR 22 within a period of one month from the date of issue of this notification.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

_________

Government of Himachal Pradesh

Department of Home (Prosecution)

No. Home (G)B(2)3/2013 Dated: Shimla-171002

NOTIFICATION

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, is pleased to promote the following Deputy District Attorneys (Class-I, Gazetted) as District Attorney (Classs-I, Gazetted) in the pay scale Rs. 15600-39100+7400 G.P. with immediate effect:—

13. Sh. Ashok Kumar Sugyan7672 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 14. Smt. Monika Malhotra 15. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 16. Sh. Arvind Nadda 17. Sh. Nand Lal 18. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel 19. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 20. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan 21. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 22. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala 23. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 24. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan

As a sequel to the above promotions, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is further pleased to order the posting of these District Attorney alongwith transfers/postings of other District Attorneys/Deputy District Attorneys in Prosecution Department with immediate effect in the public interest as under:—

5. The above officer will remain on probation for a period of two years and will be eligible to exercise option for the fixation of pay as Joint Director under FR 22 within a period of one month from the date of issue of this notification.

6. These promotions will be subject to the final outcome of SLP (C ) No. 8710 of 2009 R.K. Bharwal & others Versus State of H.P. & others.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Home).

__________

(From pre-page)

At Flag-A is the minutes of meeting of D.P.C. held on 14.11.2013 at 4.00 PM and 22.11.2013 at 4.00 PM in the office room of Addl. Chief Secretary (Home) to the Govt. of H.P. for consideration of eligible officers for promotion to the post of District Attorneys in Prosecution department. The DPC has recommended a panel of 12 officers (Dy. Distt. Attorney) for promotion to the post of District Attorneys, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Sh. Ashok Kumar Sugyan 2. Smt. Monika Malhotra 3. Sh. Surinder Singh Pathania 4. Sh. Arvind Nadda 5. Sh. Nand Lal 6. Sh. Jagdish Chand Chandel 7. Sh. Giri Raj Singh 8. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan 9. Sh. Sanjeev Katoch 10. Sh. Sunil Kuthiala 11. Sh. Jagdish Kanwar 12. Sh. Kulbir Chauhan

The Hon'ble Chief Minister, being Minister-in-Charge may kindly be requested to kindly approve the proceedings of the DPC meeting/promotion of above officers and proposal of postings of District Attorneys/Deputy District Attorneys will be submitted after the approval of above DPC proceedings by the competent authority please.

Dy. No. 52773141/14.

At present there are 42 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorneys (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+5400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution Department, the detail of which is given as under:—

1. Prosecution Department 30 2. Police 01 3. SV&ACB 03 4. S.P. office 03 5. PWD 04 6. Health 01 Total: 42

Beside above, one Dy. Distt. Attorney has been posted in Electricity Regulatory Comm., Delhi and one in BBMB, Nangal on deputation/transfer basis. In nutshell there are 44 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorneys in the Department after taking into account these posts of other departments/deputation post.

Out of above 44 posts, the department has filled up 28 posts of Deputy Distt. Attorney. Therefore, there are 16 clear cut vacancies. Besides, there will be 10 more resultant vacancies due to retirement/promotions during the year, 2014. In nut shell, there will be 26 vacancies in all i.e. 16 clear cut vacancies and 10 resultant vacancies. But at present there are only 20 Assistant District Attorneys eligible for promotion to the post of Deputy Distt. Attorney.

In order to fill up these vacancies, matter is to be placed before DPC. Accordingly Memorandum for consideration of Departmental Promotion Committee has been prepared and placed below at Flag/X for favour of approval/signatures. The Dy. Secretary (Home) may also kindly sing the Integrity certificate in r/o eligible officers.

In view of the above, worthy ACS(Home) may kindly be requested to give date and time for holding the DPC as per his convenience please.

Vacancies of Dy. Distt. Attorneys in 5 places have fallen due to the reason that five Dy. Distt. Attorneys on their promotion have been posted/retained in the same place against the post of Asstt. Distt. Attorney.

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

COMMITTEE FOR PROMOTION TO THE POSTS OF JOINT DIRECTOR,

PROSECUTION (CLASS-I) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION.

At present there are 7 posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) (Class-I) in the pay scale of Rs. 15600-39100+8400 G.P. in the cadre of Prosecution department. Out of these three posts are sanctioned in the department and four posts in other departments i.e. one each in Police Headquarters, Police Training Centre, Daroh, 2 in State Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau.

2. Out of above 7 posts of Joint Director (Prosecution), the Department has already filled up 6 posts of Joint Director. Therefore, there is one clear cut vacancy of Joint Director, Prosecution. Six more vacancies of Joint Directors are anticipated during this year owing the promotion/retirement.

3. The composition of Departmental Promotion Committee for consideration of eligible District Attorneys for the post of Joint Director (Class-I) in respect of Prosecution Department is as under:—

1. ACS/Pr. Secretary (Home) Chairman

2. Spl./Addl./Jt./Dy./under Secretary Member

(Home Prosecution)

3. Director (Prosecution) Member

4. According to the provisions R&P Rules, the post of Joint Director is a selection post and has been classified as Class-I post which is to be filed up by promotion from amongst District Attorney (Class-I) having five years regular service or combined with continuous adhoc service.

5. Above post of Joint Director has fallen vacant on 21.6.2013 due to promotion of Sh. B.S. Pathania as Director, Prosecution. Therefore, the DPC is required to recommend a panel of five officers for promotion as Joint Director, Prosecution but at present only one Distt. Attorney namely Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana, is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. Therefore, the remaining posts of Joint Director can be filled up by promotion, as and when eligible officers amongst District Attorneys will be available.

6. The ACRs of Sh. J.S. Rana, Integrity Certificate and a copy of VCCs obtained from Vigilance Department are also enclosed for the perusal of DPC. It is pertinent to bring to the notice of the DPC that ACRs the for the year 2008-09, and 2012-13 in respect of Sh. J.S. Rana are not available. The DPC is therefore, requested to consider two ACRs of preceding years in terms of instructions of the Department of Personnel.

7. It may also be added here that since these promotions shall be within Class-I posts, the provision for reservation to SC/ST categories is not attracted in this case. The DPC may kindly consider the name of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution and make suitable recommendation to the department in this regard.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

ANNEXURE-II

(Vide item No. 11 of the Performa)

CERTIFIED:

(a) That there is nothing adverse against Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana, Distt. Attorney from the vigilance angle and his integrity is not in doubt.

(b) That Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana is not under suspension;

(c) That no departmental proceedings are pending or about to be initiated against above officer.

By order, Sd/- (Vijay Kumar Sharma) Deputy Secretary (Home).

__________

Presently one post of Joint Director, Prosecution is vacant in the Department and six are anticipated during the year which is to be filled up by promotion from amongst District Attorney. Against this vacancy senior most Distt. Attorney namely Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana has been given charge of Joint Director (Prosecution). As per R&P Rules, District Attorneys having five years service are eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director. But only one District Attorney, Sh. J.S. Rana fulfils the eligibility criteria for promotion to the post Joint Director (Prosecution) as per R&P Rules. In order to fill up this vacancy of Joint Director, the matter is to be placed before the DPC. Accordingly Memorandum for consideration of DPC has been prepared and placed below at Flag-X for favour of approval/signatures. Dy. Secretary (Home) may also kindly sign the Memorandum and Integrity Certificate in r/o above officer.

The worthy ACS (Home) may kindly be requested to give date and time for holding of DPC as per his convenience please.

Placed below at Flag-A are the minutes of the meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee held on 5.03.2014 for consideration of eligible District Attorneys for promotion to the posts of Joint Director, Prosecution. Presently two posts of Joint Directors, one each in the Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla and SV&ACB, Shimla are vacant but only one officer namely Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana is eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director, as per the provisions of Recruitment and Promotion Rules. The Departmental Promotion Committee in its above meeting has recommended a name of Jagdish Singh Rana for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Prosecution.

Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana being senior most District Attorney has already been assigned the charge of Joint Director in Directorate of Prosecutions, Shimla. It is, therefore, proposed that said officer on promotion may be posted in the same place i.e. in the Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla. The Hon'ble Chief Minister, being Minister-in-Charge may kindly be requested to kindly approve the proceedings of the DPC meeting/promotion of Sh. Jagdish Singh Rana to the post of Joint Director (Prosecution) and his posting in the Directorate of Prosecution, Shimla please.

F/X

Vacancy positions of Deputy District Attorneys in the department

Vacancies of Dy. Distt. Attorneys in 5 places have fallen due to the reason that five Dy. Distt. Attorneys on their promotion have been posted/retained in the same place against the post of Asstt. Distt. Attorney.

___________

सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 20 मार्च, 2014

संख्याःडब्ल्यू. एल.एफ.-बी (2) 4/79-IV.--हिमाचल प्रदेश की राज्यपाल, भारत के संविधान के अनुच्छेद 309 के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श से, इस विभाग की समसंख्यक अधिसूचना, तारीख 22 फरवरी, 2011 द्वारा अधिसूचित हिमाचल प्रदेश सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता विभाग, पर्यवेक्षक, वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित), भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2011 में और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाती हैं, अर्थात्‌ :-

1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.--(1)इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता विभाग, पर्यवेक्षक, वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित), भर्ती और प्रोन्नति (प्रथम संशोधन) नियम, 2014 है। (2) ये नियम राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशित किए जाने की तारीख से प्रवृत्त होंगे। 2. उपाबन्ध "क" का संशोधन.--हिमाचल प्रदेश सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता विभाग, पर्यवेक्षक, वर्ग-III (अराजपत्रित), भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2011 के उपाबन्ध "क" में,

(क) स्तम्भ संख्या-7 के सामने विद्यमान उपबन्धों के स्थान पर निम्नलिख्ति रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्‌ः-7678 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 ''किसी मान्यता प्राप्त विश्वविद्यालय से, अधिमानतः सामाजिक कार्य गृह विज्ञान या इससे सम्बन्धित क्षेत्र में, स्नातक होना चाहिए ।'';

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- अति0 मुख्य सचिव (सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधि0)।

__________

[Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. WLF-B(2)4/79-IV, dated

20-3-2014 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the constitution of India].

SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 20th March, 2014

No. WLF-B(2)4/79-IV.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the H.P. Public service commission is pleased to make the following Rules further to amend the Himachal Pradesh, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Supervisor, Class-III (Non Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion, Rules, 2011 notified vide this Department Notification of even number dated 22nd February, 2011 namely:—

1. Short title and Commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Supervisor, Class-III-(Non-Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion (first amendment) Rules, 2014.

(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Amendment of Annexure-A.—In Annexure "A" to the Himachal Pradesh Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Supervisor, Class-III (Non-Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion, Rules, 2011:—

(a) For the existing provisions against Col. No. 7, the following shall be substituted, namely:—

"Should be Graduate preferably in Social Work, Home Science or related fields from a recognized University".

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (SJ&E).

''मजबूत लोकतन्त्र-सबकी भागीदारी'' निर्वाचन विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार 38-एस.डी.ए. कांम्पलैक्स, कसुम्पटी, शिमला-171009

संख्याः 3-28/2013-ई.एल.एन.-749 दिनांक : 12 मार्च, 2014

अधिसूचना

संख्याः 3-28/2013-ई0एल0एन0-भारत निर्वाचन आयोग की अधिसूचना संख्या 56/2014/रा0 दल अनु0-II, दिनांक 10 मार्च, 2014 तदानुसार 19 फाल्गुन 1935 (शक) जो कि निर्वाचन प्रतीक (आरक्षक और आबंटन) आदेश, 1968 के पैरा 17 के उप-पैरा 2 के अनुसरण में, भारत निर्वाचन आयोग की अधिसूचना संख्या 56/2013/रा0 दल अनु0-II दिनांक 18 जनवरी, 2013 में संशोधन के सम्बन्ध में है, को इसके अंग्रेजी रूपान्तर सहित जनसाधारण की सूचना हेतु प्रकाशित किया जाता है।

आदेश से,

नरेन्द्र चौहान मुख्य निर्वाचन अधिकारी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

--------

भारत निर्वाचन आयोग

निर्वाचन सदन, अशोक रोड, नई दिल्ली-110001 संख्या : 56/2014/रा0 दल अनु0-II

तारीख : 10 मार्च, 2014 19 फाल्गुन, 1935 (शक्‌)

अधिसूचना

यतः भारत निर्वाचन आयोग ने निर्वाचन प्रतीक (आरक्षण और आबंटन) आदेश, 1968 के पैरा 17 के अनुसरण में जारी, मान्यता प्राप्त राष्ट्रीय और राज्जीय दलों, रजिस्ट्रीकृत अमान्यता प्राप्त दलों और मुक्त प्रतीकों की सूची को विनिर्दिष्ट करने वाली, समय-समय पर यथा संशोधित, अपनी अधिसूचना संख्या 56/2013/रा0द0अनु0-II, तारीख 18 जनवरी, 2013 को अद्‌यतन करने का निर्णय लिया है;

2. अतः अब निर्वाचन प्रतीक (आरक्षण और आबंटन) आदेश, 1968 के पैरा 17 के अनुसरण में, भारत के राजपत्र, असाधारण भाग-II, खण्ड-3, उपखण्ड (iii) में प्रकाशित तारीख 18 जनवरी, 2013 की, समय-समय पर यथा संशोधित, अपनी उपर्युक्त अधिसूचना सं0 56/2013/रा0द0अनु0-II के अधिक्रमण में निर्वाचन आयोग एतद्‌द्वारा विनिर्दिष्ट करता है :--

(क) सारणी-I में, राष्ट्रीय दल और उनके लिए क्रमशः आरक्षित प्रतीक और उनके मुख्यालयों के डाक-पते;

(ख) सारणी-II में, राज्यीय दल राज्य या वे राज्य जहां ये राज्यीय दल है और ऐसे राज्य या राज्यों में उनके लिए क्रमशः आरक्षित प्रतीक और उनके मुख्यालयों के डाक-पते;

7680 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 31 मार्च, 2014/10 चैत्र, 1936 (ग) सारणी-III में, रजिस्ट्रीकृत अमान्यताप्राप्त राजनैतिक दल और उनके मुख्यालयों के डाक पते;

और

(घ) सारणी-IV में, मुक्त प्रतीक

जहां तक जम्मू और कश्मीर की विधान सभा के लिए निर्वाचनों का सम्बन्ध है, यह अधिसूचना जम्मू और कश्मीर निर्वाचनों का संचालन नियम 1965 के नियम 5 और 10 के निबंधनों तथा निर्वाचन प्रतीक (आरक्षण और आबंटन) आदेश, 1968 के निबंधनों के अधीन है, जिन्हें जम्मू और कश्मीर विधान सभा के निर्वाचनों के लिए लागू किया गया है, के अनुसार जारी समझी जाएगी।

सारणी-1

राष्र्टीय दल

सारणी -॥

राज्यीय दल

सारणी-III

रजिःशीकृ त अमान्यता ूाप्त दल