राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शिमला, सोमवार, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 21st November, 2014
No. HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XV.—Hon'ble the Chief Justice in exercise of the powers vested in him under Rule 2 (32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009 has been pleased to declare Civil Judge (Sr. Division)-cum-ACJM, Ghumarwin, H.P. as Drawing and Disbursing Officer in respect of the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-JM (III), Ghumarwin and also the 170-राजपत्र/2014-24-11-2014 (4327) 4328 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 Controlling Officer for the purpose of salary, T.A. etc. in respect of establishment attached to the aforesaid Court under Major Head "2014-Administration of Justice" with immediate effect till Pratibha Negi, Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-JM (III), Ghumarwin returns from her training.
BY ORDER, Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
_______
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 18th November, 2014
No. HHC/GAZ/14-226/96-II-Part.—Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 04 days' commuted leave w.e.f. 16-9-2014 to 19-9-2014 in favour of Shri Rajesh Tomar, Additional District and Sessions Judge (II), Shimla, H.P.
Certified that Shri Rajesh Tomar had joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Rajesh Tomar would have continued to hold the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge (II), Shimla, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
BY ORDER, Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 18th November, 2014
No. HHC/GAZ/14-220/96-I.—Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex-post facto sanction of 13 days' commuted leave for 20-10-2014 to 1-11-2014 with permission to suffix Sunday fell on 2.11.2014 in favour of Shri Bhupesh Sharma, Additional District and Sessions Judge, CBI Court, Shimla, H.P.
Certified that Shri Bhupesh Sharma had joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Shri Bhupesh Sharma would have continued to hold the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, CBI Court, Shimla, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.
BY ORDER, Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
4329 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA -171001
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 17th November, 2014
No. HHC/GAZ/14-320/2010.—Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 15 days' earned leave w.e.f. 6-12-2014 to 20-12-2014 with permission to suffix Sunday falling on 21-12-2014 in favour of Ms. Akshi Sharma, Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-JMIC (II), Dehra, District Kangra, H.P.
Certified that Ms. Akshi Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.
Also certified that Ms. Akshi Sharma would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-JMIC (II), Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.
BY ORDER, Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
_______
HIGH COURTOF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Dated : 17th November, 2014
No. HHC/Admn.3(240)/86.—13 days earned leave on and w.e.f. 24-11-2014 to 06-12-2014, with permission to affix Sundays falling on 23-11-2014, is hereby sanctioned , in favour of Shri Bhupender Gupta, Court Master of this Registry.
Certified that Shri Bhupender Gupta is likely to join the X'same same post and at the same station from where he procceds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.
Certified that Shri Bhupender Gupta would have continued to officiate the same post of Court Master but for his proceedings on above leave.
BY ORDER, Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
________
HIGH COURTOF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171001
NOTIFICATION
Dated : 20th November, 2014
No. HHC/Admn.3(399)/95-I.—11 days earned leave on and w.e.f. 02-12-2014 to 12-12-2014, with permission to suffix second Saturday and Sunday falling on 13-12-2014 & 14-12-2014, is hereby sanctioned , in favour of Shri Beer Singh Sharma, Secretary, of this Registry.
4330 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 Certified that Shri Beer Singh Sharma is likely to join the same same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leaveafter the expiry of the above leave period.
Certified that Shri Beer Singh Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of Secretary but for his proceeding on above leave.
BY ORDER Sd/- REGISTRAR GENERAL.
_________
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
NOTIFICATION
Dated: 6th March, 2014
HHC/RULES/HC STAFF CAR RULES/2014.—The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice is leased to make the following Rules for the regulation of use, maintenance and control of the High Court Staff Cars (other than the Judges' Staff Cars):
| SHORT TITLE AND COMMENCEMENT | 1. | (a) These Rules shall be called "The High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Use, Maintenance and Control of Staff Cars) Rules, 2014. (b) These Rules shall come into force with immediate effect. |
| DEFINITIONS | 2. | In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires- (a) "Branch Officer" means any officer of the Registry of the High Court who is holding the rank of a Section Officer or above the rank of Section Officer. (b) "Chief Justice" means the Chief Justice of High Court of Himachal Pradesh. ( c) Controlling Officer" means the "Officer in the rank of the Registrar designated as Controlling Officer of the vehicles of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh by the Chief Justice by a general or special order. ( d) "Drivers" means the driver appointed or working as such on the establishment of High Court of H. P. ( e) "Earmarked Vehicle" means the vehicle earmarked by the Chief Justice exclusively for use by the Chief Justice or Judge(s) of the High Court of H. P. ( f) "Financial Rules" means H.P. Financial Rules applicable at the relevant time. ( g) "Government" means the Government of Himachal Pradesh. ( h) "High Court" means High Court of Himachal Pradesh. |
| (i) "Judges Relief Vehicle" means the vehicle of the High Court of H.P. which is earmarked as Judges' Relief Vehicle by the Chief Justice and normally to be used as relief vehicle or additional vehicle, in the event any emergency or exigency, by the Chief Justice or the Judges. ( j) "Officer-in-charge" means officer in the rank of the Deputy Registrar or Assistant Registrar designated as Officer-in-charge" of the vehicles of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh by the Chief Justice by general or a special order. ( k) "Officer of eligible category" means officer of the Registry of High Court of H.P. in the rank of Section Officer or of an equivalent rank or above the rank of Section Officer. ( l) "Prescribed"means prescribed under these Rules. ( m) "Registrar General" means the Registrar of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. ( n) "Registrar" means the Registrar appointed in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. ( o) "Vehicles" means the vehicles registered in the name of the High Court of H.P. | ||
| Classification of Vehicles | 3. | (a) The vehicles shall be classified as under:- (i) Earmarked vehicles of the Chief Justice and Judges. (ii) Judges' Relief Vehicle. (iii) Earmarked Vehicles of the Registrar General and Registrars. (iv) General Pool Vehicles. |
| Control of Vehicles | 4. | Subject to the overall control and supervision of the Controlling Officer and the Registrar General, the Officer in-charge shall be responsible for the proper use, care, maintenance and control of the vehicles. |
| Duties of the Officerin- Charge | 5. | (I) The Officer-In-Charge shall maintain:-- a) An inventory of the equipment b) A record of repairs and replacement of any spare part indicating the costs and the dates on which such repairs and or replacement(s) of parts were carried out. c) A register showing the cost of petrol etc. consumed and all incidental expenditure incurred. L og Book of each vehicle in the format as given in Annexure-A, showing the particulars of journeys performed by the vehicle both on official duty and |
| otherwise. The private journeys shall be clearly shown in red ink. However, there shall be no necessity to maintain entries in respect of the Log Books of earmarked vehicles of the Chief Justice and Judges so far as consumption of 200 liters of fuel is concerned. | ||
| (II) The Officer-in-Charge shall:- a. Arrange for the proper and prompt recovery of charges recoverable for the use of the vehicles for non duty purposes or otherwise and their credit to the Government under proper head; b. Check the inventory of the equipment every month and arrange to recover any loss arising out of the negligence or fault from the persons concerned; c. Ensure that the drivers of the vehicles attend their duties in the prescribed uniform and submit a report to the Controlling Officer for any departure by them in this behalf; d. Ensure that the vehicles are not misused in any manner by any officer or official or otherwise; e. Have the vehicles tested every six months from fitness for journeys and place the report on the record; f. Submit a report half yearly to the Controlling Officer regarding the expenditure incurred on the maintenance of the vehicles; g. Shall ensure that there are beneficial and economical maintenance contracts with proper dealer(s) for the repair and maintenance. | ||
| Applicability of HPFR and duties of the drivers for getting the vehicles properly repaired and maintained | 6. | a) It shall be the duty of each driver of the vehicle to ensure that the vehicle being driven by him is repaired and maintained properly from time to time and all the repairs should be carried out in his presence. b ) The expenditure on the repairs, maintenance, replacement of vehicles, purchase of new vehicles, purchase of petrol and other lubricants shall be regulated under the provisions of the Financial Rules as amended from time to time by the Government. c ) The work of the repairs of the vehicles shall be |
| normally carried out from the authorized dealer of the vehicle concerned. However, in case it is not possible to get the vehicle repaired from the authorized dealer due to one or the other reason(s), then the vehicle can be got repaired from the open market only under very emergent or exceptional circumstances that too on ensuring that the spare parts to be replaced during the course of the repairs are genuine and of the standard ISI make, or course, after complying with all the codal formalities under the HPFR. d ) Whenever, the repair or maintenance of any vehicle is to be got done locally at Shimla or surrounding areas, such process shall form part of normal duties of the driver(s) and no TA/DA shall be admissible to them for the same. However, in case the repair of any vehicle is to be got done from any place which is 8 Kms beyond the municipal limits of Shimla, then the driver shall be entitled for the TA/DA as per the relevant Travelling Rules. | ||
| Earmarking of vehicles | 7. | a) The Chief Justice may, in his discretion, earmark the vehicles for such use or for such person(s) as he may deem fit. However, any vehicle once earmarked for use by any Judge, then the same shall not be taken back and earmarked to some other person unless the judge to whom the same was earmarked earlier, consents for the same. b ) The Chief Justice, Judges, Registrar General, other Registrars and any Officer, who are entitled to the earmarked vehicles as Judicial Officer or otherwise shall also be entitled to an earmarked vehicle in the High Court of H.P. c ) The Chief Justice, under emergent circumstances, and in his sole discretion, may permit the use of any earmarked vehicle by any other person or any visiting dignitary. However before allowing such use of any earmarked vehicle of any Judge, his/her consent is to be obtained. |
| Use of vehicles for official purposes | 8. | The vehicles shall, normally be used only by officers not below the rank of Assistant Registrar or of an equivalent rank for the performance of any official duty; Provided that the vehicle may be used by an officer/official of the High Court below the rank of an Assistant Registrar with the approval of the Controlling Officer; Provided further that the vehicle shall not be used by any officer, except those who have been provided |
| earmarked vehicles, for official journeys, 25kilometers beyond the municipal limits of Shimla, without the express approval of the Chief Justice or any judge authorized by the Chief Justice to grant permission shall have to be obtained. | ||
| Treating of official journey | 9. | Without prejudice to the provisions of Rule 8 above, journeys performed on the following occasions shall be treated as official:-- a . Journeys performed by the officers of the eligible category for attending official meetings; b . Journeys performed for picking up officers from their residences or dropping them back when they have to attend any official work including meetings outside the normal working hours or to attend any official meeting during the normal working hours if the same is convened at a place outside their normal place of work; c . Journey performed for picking up other officers/officials from their residences or dropping them back when they have to attend any official work including meeting outside the normal working hours, if the same is convened at a place outside their normal place of work. Explanation:- "Outside the normal working hours" shall mean "the hours before 9 AM and after 8 PM on working days and shall include all holidays". Provided that the entries in the Log Book of the Vehicle shall have to be got authenticated by the Branch officer concerned or the Registrar concerned who detained or summoned such officer/official for performing officials duties during odd hours. However, in case any officer/official is detained under the order of the Chief Justice or Judge or Registrar General then such journey shall have to be authenticated by the Principal Private Secretary to the HCJ or Secretary and in his absence by the Senior most Private Secretary attached with the Chief Justice or Judge or the Registrar General, as the case may be. Note: This facility shall also be available to the officials of NIC posted in the High Court and in their case the journey shall be authenticated by the CPC. d . Journey performed from residence/office to the Airport/Railway station/ Bus Stand and vice versa by the Officers of the eligible category while proceeding on or returning from an official tour(s); |
| e. Journeys performed in cases of an emergency, such as when an officer/official of the High Court is taken ill while on duty in the High Court or at the residence(s) of the Chief Justice or Judges or attending official work somewhere else at Shimla itself or any official meeting, and removed to hospital and thereafter to his residence or straightway to his/her residence; f . Journeys performed by the Chief Justice, Judges of the Supreme Court and other High Courts or their spouses or close family members visiting Shimla within the limits of Shimla Municipal Corporation or from airport, bus stand or railway station, Shimla to the place of stay at Shimla and vice versa but subject to availability of the vehicle. Provided that the vehicle(s) may be used by such dignitaries for journeys outside the limits of Shimla Municipal Corporation with the approval of the Chief Justice or the Judge authorized by the Chief Justice in this behalf and such journey may be treated as official or private at the discretion of the Chief Justice. g . Journey performed for fetching forms and other articles of stationery from the Printing & Stationery Department or from the government press or from the local market as the case may be; h . Journey performed by the Officers/ Officials of the High Court for taking records to the local subordinate Courts or other Courts and bringing back any record from such Courts; i . Journey performed by any personal staff member(s) of the Chief Justice or Judges when they are directed to accompany such dignitaries to their earmarked or other residences in connection with official works; j . Journey performed by the Court Officer or any other officer/official specifically deputed for the purpose of inspection or any other work at the official residences of the Chief Justice and Judges. k . Journey performed by the Registrar General, Registrars and Officers who are entitled to the earmarked vehicles from residences to the High Court and vice versa; l . Journey performed by the cashier or any other official specifically deputed for the purpose of collecting the payment of salary and other bill of the High Court Establishment exceeding Rs.25,000/- from the bank or treasury. | ||
| m. Journeys performed by the former Chief Justice or judges of the High Court or widow(s) of any former Chief Justice or judge of this High Court to attend any function or official lunch or dinner organized by the High Court, on the invitation of the High Court but subject to availability of the vehicle and only within the municipal limits of Shimla. n . Journeys performed by any officer/official of the Supreme Court of India or other High Court or other department of the Government or any other body corporate, if such official is on official tour to the High Court of Himachal Pradesh on the invitation of the High Court or otherwise. The Chief Justice, in his discretion can also allow the use of the High Court vehicle by such officer/official even to visit the areas around Shimla. o . Journeys performed by the Protocol Officer/SO(protocol) or other officer/official deputed to perform the Protocol duties with any visiting dignitary and also to make any reservation of air ticket, railway ticket or bus ticket or taxi and also in connection with the medical treatment of the Chief Justice or Judge or visiting dignitary or their family members etc. p . Journeys performed under the general or special directions of the Chief Justice. q . Journeys performed by the Chief Justice and Judges for the purpose of medical treatment outside the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation of Shimla wherefor they are entitled for TA under the relevant Medical Attendance Rules. r . Journey performed for dropping an officer/official of the High Court on his retirement at his/her residence, within the state of HP and such journey can be authenticated by the Officer-in-Charge of the vehicles. s . Journey performed from Shimla to his/her native place by an Officer/Official of the Registry on bereavement due to death of his/her father, mother, spouse or children". t . Journey performed from Shimla to his/her native place/residence in the event of death of an employee of the Registry in harness by the members of the High Court welfare Association to offer wreath/pay condelences. | ||
| Use of vehicles for non-duty purposes | 10. Without prejudice to the official requirements, the vehicle in general pool may be used for the following journeys by the officers/officials for non-duty purposes on the payment of prescribed charges: ( a) Journeys performed from residence to office and vice versa except in the case of the Registrar General, Registrars etc. with whom an earmarked vehicle has been attached for his/her use. ( b) Occasional journeys performed for attending private meetings or invitations. ( c) Visiting hospital in connection with self-ailment or the ailments of his parents, spouse, son or daughter. ( d) Such other journey as may be permitted by the Chief Justice or by the Judge authorised by the Chief Justice to permit such use in the special circumstances of each case. Explanation.—No private journey shall be performed under this Rule by any officer outside the limits of Shimla Municipal Corporation without the prior permission of the Chief Justice or the Judge authorized by the Chief Justice to permit such use in the special circumstances of each case. Provided that the Registrar General and/or any of the Registrars or Officer who has been provided with an earmarked vehicle can perform such journey in his/her earmarked vehicle or any other vehicle provided as a relief vehicle due to nonavailability of his/her earmarked vehicle, within the jurisdiction of the State of H.P. ( e) The Chief Justice or the Judge authorized in this behalf by the Chief Justice, in his/her discretion, can allow the use of the vehicles by the former judges or their spouses or the widows of former judges for performing journeys for visiting hospitals, bus stand, railway station etc. within the local Municipal limits of Shimla on payment of the charges prescribed by the State Govt. from time to time. ( f) The use of general pool vehicle within the territory of Municipal Corporation of Shimla by officer and official of the High Court below the rank of Deputy Registrar can be allowed by the Controlling Officer, on payment of prescribed fee under these Rules only for the purpose of visiting hospital in connection with his/her spouse, parents or Dependent children. | |
| Provided that any such use beyond the limits of municipal limits of Shimla town shall be at the discretion of the Chief Justice or the Judge authorized by the Chief Justice to permit such use. However, in case of any grave emergency, if the prior permission of the Chief Justice or the Judge cannot be obtained due to the fact that they are busy in the court, the Registrar General can permit such use, of course, subject to the ratification by the Chief Justice or the Judge, as the case may be. ( g) Judges Relief Vehicle/ General Pool Vehicle on payment basis.—Without prejudice to the official requirements, the Judges' relief vehicle or general pool vehicle, if available, may be used by the judges or their family members for non-duty purposes in addition to the staff car allotted to the Judge after prior approval of the Chief Justice on payment of charges as follows: The charges for the journeys so performed by such vehicle will be calculated by the cost of fuel consumed by the said vehicle for the purpose of such journeys at the rate at which the High Court has purchased the same. Such use beyond the municipal limits of Shimla shall be permissible only on the approval of the Chief Justice or by the Judge authorized in this behalf by the Chief Justice for a maximum period of 10 days and in case any dispute arises in this behalf, then the same shall be referred to the Chief Justice and his decision shall be final. ( h) Without prejudice to the official requirements, the judges' relief vehicle or general pool vehicle, if available, at the discretion of the Chief Justice or the Judge authorized by the Chief Justice to allow such use, may be allowed to be used by the visiting Chief Justice or judge of the Supreme Court or High Court or their close family members for performing journeys within the limits of Shimla Municipal Corporation or beyond that on payment of charges prescribed by the State Govt. from time to time, which shall be recoverable through the person attending protocol duty with them or through the staff of guest house or rest house where they would be staying. | ||
| Charges for use of vehicles for non-duty purpose by the Registrars'. | 11. | a) The charges for use of vehicles for non-duty purposes shall be at the rate as may be prescribed for private journeys by the Government of HP from time to time which shall mutatis mutandis apply for performing journeys for non-duty purposes in the vehicles. |
| b) The Registrar General, the Registrar and the Officers who has an earmarked vehicle shall have to deposit an amount of Rs. 900/- (Rupees nine hundred) only per month or such amount as may be prescribed by the State Government from time to time for such use and he/she shall be entitled to use his earmarked vehicle or in absence of the earmarked vehicle any other vehicle up to the extent of 250 Kms. Per month. c ) The amount of Rs.900/- shall have to be deposited per month the moment option is exercised by the Registrar General, Registrars or the Officer as mentioned in clause (b) of this Rule for the use of earmarked vehicleand this amount shall have to be deposited every month irrespective of the fact that such officer has used the vehicle up to 250 kms. during the preceding month or not. Provided that if the total mileage for private purposes exceeds 250 kms or crosses the limit as may be prescribed from time to time by the State Government per month, the officer will be required to pay the amount per km as may be prescribed by the State Government for performance of private journeys from time to time and as referred in clause (a) of this Rule. d ) Charges for non-duty journeys shall be recoverable for the distance covered by the vehicle from the time it leaves the official garage till its return to that place. e ) The amount for non-duty purposes shall be recovered on monthly basis and credited to the miscellaneous receipts of the department under the Head "2014-Administration of Justice". | ||
| Log Book and regulation of the use of the Judges Relief Vehicle, Registrars and General Pool Vehicles. | 12. | (a) Log Book of each vehicle shall be maintained in the form prescribed in Annexure-A ( b) Separate Log Book shall be maintained for each vehicle. ( c) The Officer/Official using the staff car shall note in the Log Book in his own handwriting the reading of the speedometer/milometer at the start and at the completion of the trip, after verifying the reading and shall give sufficient particulars of the journey to indicate that it was official. Provided that in the case of the Registrar General, other Registrars and Officers in the rank of |
| the Sessions Judge or the Additional District and Sessions Judge, the entries in the Log Book shall be made by their Secretary/ Private Secretary/Personal Assistant or in their absence by the person performing their functions, of course, after consultation with the officer concerned. ( d) The Log Books in respect of each vehicle shall be closed at the end of each month and a summary, in Annexure-B, prepared in the Log Book showing the details of duty and non-duty journeys performed during the month. ( e) The Log Books shall be preserved for a period of five years reckoned from the date of last entry in the same or one year after their examination by local Audit, whichever is earlier.; Provided that no Log Book becoming due for destruction after the stipulated period shall, however, be destroyed until the settlement of all audit objections relating to any entry therein or till the pendency of any criminal case wherein any particular Log Book shall be required to be produced, in original. | ||
| General | 13. | a) If any question arises, whether a particular journey shall be treated as official or private, it shall be decided by the Chief justice or the Judge authorized by the Chief Justice to decide so and his decision in this behalf shall be final. b ) Where it will not be in public interest to give full details of the journey in the Log Book, the insertion of the words" Confidential/Official" in the appropriate column(s) of the Log Book of any particular vehicle shall be sufficient; Provided that all such entries shall be countersigned by the Registrar General or in his absence by the Registrar or Officers looking after the function of the Registrar General. c ) All the vehicles shall prominently carry plates in front and at the rear indicating it to be the vehicle of the High Court. d ) The red or blue beacons on the front top portion of the vehicles of the High Court shall be covered with black cover when the dignitary, who is authorized to the use of the same, is not occupying the vehicle. |
| e) National flag or any other flag shall be used in front of the vehicle as per the eligibility of the dignitary occupying the vehicle and it shall be the duty of the driver of each vehicle to ensure that the national flag or the other flag is given due respect as per the flag code. f ) No device giving unreasonably high sound such as siren etc. except the horn as per the latest specifications under the Central Motor Vehicle Rules shall be used in any vehicle unless such use is permissible under the relevant Rules or instruction issued either by the Central or State Government or any other competent authority in this behalf. g ) Subject to the Rules made herein-above, other Rules regulating the use and maintenance of the government vehicles and conditions of services of Drivers in Himachal Pradesh, framed by the Government, as are in force at present, and as may be amended from time to time, shall, mutatis mutandis, apply in respect of the vehicles and Drivers of the High Court. | ||
| General Relaxing Power | 14. | The Chief Justice may, if thinks fit, necessary or expedient so to do, relax any of the provisions of these Rules. |
| Repeal and Savings | 15. | "The High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Use, Maintenance and Control of Staff Cars) Rules, 1981" as amended from time to time and any instructions issued qua regulating the use and maintenance of the earmarked vehicles of the Chief Justice shall stand repealed but any action taken under the said Rules or Instruction shall not be invalidated merely on coming into force of these Rules. |
BY ORDER,
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,
REGISTRAR GENERAL.
________
ANNEXURE 'A'
FORM OF REQUISITION
1. Name of the Officer/official (with designation) : ______________________________ 2. Purpose of journey: Whether ______________________________ Private or official (if official full particulars thereof): ______________________________4342 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 ______________________________ 3. Place(s) to be visited: ______________________________ ______________________________
4. Date and time when the ______________________________ Vehicle is required :
5. Duration for which the ______________________________ Vehicle is required: ______________________________ Signature of the requisitioning Signature of the Controlling Officer/official. Authority
________
ANNEXURE 'B"
STAFF CAR NO._________________DEPARTMENT/________________OF ____________
| Date | Time From | To | Speedometer reading | Kilometers governed | Name and designation of officer using staff car | Placed violated | Purpose of journeys, if official full details. | Petrol drawn (Ltrs.) | Signature of the officer/ official using the vehicle. His remarks, if any. |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
ANNEXURE 'C'
SUMMARY OF MILAGE/___________DURING THE MONTH OF _____________
| Speedometer reading at the beginning of the month | Speedometer reading at the end of the month. | Total mileage during the month. | Official journeys | Private journeys officer-wise. | Amount recovered towards private journeys |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE
1. Quantity of petrol R/F from the last month: 2. Total quantity of petrol purchased during the month. 3. Total (1+2) 4. Quantity of petrol C/O to the next month: 5. Total quantity of petrol consumed during the month. 6. Average per litre.
Dealing Assistant/hand Officer-in-charge Controlling Officer
4343 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar, District
Mandi (H. P.)
In the matter of :
1. Devinder Nath s/o Shri Padam Chand, V.P.O. Serikothi, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi (H. P.).
2. Gangai Devi d/o Shri Bhagi Rath, r/o Village Batdhar, P. O. Nauhali, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi (H. P.)
. . Applicants.
Versus
General public
. . Respondent.
Subject.—Application for registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Notice to the general public :
Devinder Nath and Gangai Devi have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 19-9-2014 at Mahamaya Temple Sundernagar, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi H. P. and they are living together as husband and wife since then, hence their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 19-12-2014 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.
Issued today on 13-11-2014 under my hand and seal of the court.
Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar, District Mandi (H. P.).
_______
ब अदालत श्री मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) मुकद्दमा नं0 : 43/2013, 46/2013
तारीख दायर : 12-8-2013 श्रीमती हिमी पुत्री श्री कालू, निवासी गांव बधाल, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री रामा नन्द, निवासी गांव शाह, डा0 धार-गौरा, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) . . प्रार्थिया।
बनाम
1. श्री मनोहरु पुत्र श्री बाला नन्द, निवासी गांव रंगोरी, तहसील रामपुर बशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
2. श्री देव राज पुत्र बसू देव, निवासी गांव जानी, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) 3. श्री राम सरन पुत्र श्री घोई, निवासी बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) 4344 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 4. श्री हिरा दास पुत्र श्री स्यामकू, निवासी गांव खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
5. श्री बलदेव पुत्र श्री स्यामकू, निवासी गांव खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
6. श्री गुलाब सिंह पुत्र श्री उदी, निवासी गांव खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
7. श्री ज्ञान प्रकाश पुत्र श्री आगर दास, निवासी गांव खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
8. श्रीमती रामेश्वरी पत्नी श्री चन्दू लाल नेगी, निवासी गांव बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
9. श्रीमती सुमित्रा देवी पुत्री श्री चन्दू लाल नेगी, निवासी गांव बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ।
10. श्रीमती सनम देवी पुत्री श्री चन्दू लाल नेगी, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री राकेश चन्द, निवासी गांव बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
11. श्री छेवांग नरगू पुत्र श्री चन्दू लाल नेगी, निवासी गांव बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला . . प्रतिवादी। दरख्वास्त तकसीम जेर धारा 123, हि0 प्र0 भू0 रा0 अ0 बाबत अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 75/200 ता 208, किो 33, रकबा तादादी 01-13-61 है0, खाता/खतौनी नं0 79/218, खसरा नं0 81, रकबा तादादी 00-08-82 है0 वाका चक बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)। नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
प्रार्थिया श्रीमती हिमी पुत्री कालू, निवासी गांव बधाल, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री रामा नन्द, निवासी गांव शाह, डा0 धार-गौरा, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 75/200 ता 208, किो 33, रकबा तादादी 01-13-61 है0, खाता/खतौनी नं0 79/218, खसरा नं0 81, रकबा तादादी 00-08-82 है0 वाका चक बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) की तकसीम दरख्वास्त इस अदालत में बराए हुकमन तकसीम गुजारी है, जो इस अदालत में विचाराधीन है। प्रतिवादीगण नं0 1 ता 11 की तामील बार-बार समन जारी करने के उपरान्त असालतन न होनी पाई जा रही है जिस कारण इस अदालत को यकीन हो गया है कि इनकी तामील साधारण तरीके से होनी सम्भव नहीं है। अतः प्रतिवादीगण नं0 1 ता 11 को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वे दिनांक 19-12-2014 को प्रातः 10.00 बजे असालतन या वकालतन पैरवी मुकद्दमा हेतु हाजिर अदालत आएं। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में यह समझा जाएगा कि इस खाता की तकसीम बारा किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज नहीं है तथा यकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी। आज दिनांक 30-10-2014 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया
मोहर। मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
------
ब अदालत श्री मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) मुकद्दमा नं0 : 85/2012, 86/2012, 87/2012 तारीख दायर : 6-12-2012 श्री मनसा राम पुत्र स्व0 श्री हरु, निवासी खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
. . प्रार्थी।4345 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 बनाम
1. श्रीमती सुना देवी पुत्री स्व0 श्री हरु, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री पूर्ण चन्द, निवासी गांव दलान, तहसील कुमारसैन, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
2. श्रीमती हरी भक्ति पत्नी श्री धर्म सिंह, निवासी गांव बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला . . प्रतिवादी। (हि0 प्र0) ।
दरख्वास्त तकसीम जेर धारा 123, हि0 प्र0 भू0 रा0 अ0 बाबत अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 58/150 ता 151, किो 4, रकबा तादादी 00-26-59 है0, खाता/खतौनी नं0 59/152, ता 153, किो 4, रकबा तादादी 00-25-90 है0 व खाता/खतौनी नं0 63/158 ता 160, किो 6, रकबा तादादी 00-30-93 है0 वाका चक बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।
प्रार्थी श्री मनसा राम पुत्र स्व0 श्री हरु, निवासी गांव खनाश, डा0 सराहन, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 58/150 ता 151, किो 4, रकबा तादादी 00-26-59 है0, खाता/खतौनी नं0 59/152, ता 153, किो 4, रकबा तादादी 00-25-90 है0 व खाता/खतौनी नं0 63/158 ता 160, किो 6, रकबा तादादी 00-30-93 है0 वाका चक बधाल, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) की तकसीम दरख्वास्त इस अदालत में बराए हुकमन तकसीम गुजारी हैं, जो इस अदालत में विचाराधीन है। प्रतिवादी नं0 1 ता 2 की तामील बार-बार समन जारी करने के उपरान्त असालतन न होनी पाई जा रही है जिस कारण इस अदालत को यकीन हो गया है कि इनकी तामील साधारण तरीके से होनी सम्भव नहीं है। अतः प्रतिवादी नं0 1 ता 2 को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वे दिनांक 19-12-2014 को प्रातः 10.00 बजे असालतन या वकालतन पैरवी मुकद्दमा हेतु हाजिर अदालत आएं। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में यह समझा जाएगा कि उन्हें इस खाता की तकसीम बारा किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज नहीं है तथा यकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी।
आज दिनांक 30-10-2014 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।
मोहर। मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
------
ब अदालत श्री मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) मुकद्दमा नं0 : 20/2014
तारीख दायर : 7-4-2014 श्रीमती धर्म दासी पुत्री श्री सूरत राम, निवासी गांव क्याओ, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री पीरकू राम, निवासी गांव बैईबाग, डा0 ज्यूरी, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) . . वादी/प्रथम पक्ष।
बनाम
1. श्रीमती मूरतू पुत्री श्री सूरत राम, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री मनू राम, गांव व डा0 क्याओ, तहसील . . प्रतिवादी। रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)
दरख्वास्त तकसीम जेर धारा 123, हि0 प्र0 भू0 रा0 अ0 बाबत अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 74/197, किो 5, रकबा तादादी 00-20-45 है0, वाका चक क्याओ, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।4346 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 नोटिस बनाम आम जनता। प्रार्थिया श्रीमती धर्म दासी पुत्री श्री सूरत राम, निवासी क्याओ, हालाबाद पत्नी श्री पीरकू राम, निवासी गांव बैईबाग, डा0 ज्यूरी, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 74/197, किो 5, रकबा तादादी 00-20-45 है0, वाका चक क्याओ, तहसील रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) की तकसीम दरख्वास्त इस अदालत में बराए हुकमन तकसीम गुजारी है, जो इस अदालत में विचाराधीन है। प्रतिवादी श्रीमती मूरतू खाता हजा में मालिक दर्ज कागजात माल है प्रतिवादी की तामील बार-बार समन जारी होने के पश्चात् भी असालतन न होनी पाई जा रही है तथा इस अदालत को यकीन हो गया है कि इनकी तामील साधारण तरीके से होनी सम्भव नहीं है। अतः प्रतिवादी मूरतू को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि वह दिनांक 10-12-2014 को प्रातः 10.00 बजे असालतन या वकालतन पैरवी मुकद्दमा हेतु हाजिर अदालत आएं। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में यह समझा जाएगा कि उन्हें इस खाता की तकसीम बारा किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज नहीं है तथा यकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जावेगी। आज दिनांक 30-10-2014 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।
मोहर। मुकेश शर्मा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, रामपुर बुशैहर, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
------
In the Court of Shri M. R. Bhardwaj, H.A.S., Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Theog,
District Shimla (H. P.)
Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Shyam Nand, r/o Village Nahol, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla (H. P.)
.. Applicant.
Versus
The general public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13 (3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas, Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Shyam Nand, r/o Village Nahol, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla (H. P.) has moved an application before the undersigned for the registration of name of his son namely Abhinav whose date of birth is 8-9-2013 in the record of Gram Panchayat Nahol.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the entry of above mentioned name, may submit objection in writing in this court on or before 17-12-2014, failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 15-11-2014.
Seal.
M. R. BHARDWAJ, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Theog, District Shimla ( H. P.).
4347 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936ब अदालत श्री देवेन्दर काल्टा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, कोटखाई, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) श्री वाला राम पुत्र श्री गेथल, ग्राम गरेई, डा0 गरावग, तहसील कोटखाई, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) . . प्रार्थी।
बनाम
वीर सिंह पुत्र शिवु राम, ग्राम गरेई, डाकघर गरावग, तहसील कोटखाई . . प्रत्यार्थीगण। जेर धारा 37, भू0 राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 के अन्तर्गत अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 72/124 फिन, खसरा नं0 304 व 305, किाा-2, तादादी 0-14-71 है0, चक गरेई की दरुस्ती इन्द्राज बारे प्रार्थना-पत्र (दरुस्ती जमाबन्दी खाना नं0 3)।
उपरोक्त विषय बारा प्रार्थी उपरोक्त ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत मेें प्रार्थना-पत्र गुजारा है कि खा0 नं0 304 तादादी रकबा 0-02-12 है0 वाका महाल गरेई, तहसील कोटखाई का मालिक व काबिज हूं परन्तु राजस्व रिकॉर्ड में खाना नं0 3 में वाला राम पुत्र गेथल, ग्राम गरेई तथा खाना नं0 4 में वीर सिंह पुत्र शिवु पुत्र नामालूम कब्जा स्वयं वाला राम हिस्सेदार रैहन तहत मुरतैहन चला आ रहा है। लगभग 30-35 वर्ष से वीर सिंह उपरोक्त का कोई पता न है, न ही समन की तामील करना सम्भव है।
अतः इस सम्बन्ध में बजरिया इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस दरुस्ती बारा उपरोक्त प्रत्यार्थी या अन्य किसी को कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अदालत अधोहस्ताक्षरी के दिनांक 10-12-2014 या इससे पूर्व अपना एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है। उजर या एतराज दर्ज न आने की सूरत में दरुस्ती के आदेश पारित किए जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 11-11-2014 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित अदालत से जारी किया गया। मोहर। देवेन्दर काल्टा, सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, कोटखाई, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
------
न्यायालय श्री गिरीश एम0 सकलानी, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग(तहसीलदार) अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0 प्र0)
मनशा राम पुत्र गोरखू पुत्र घुंघुरू, निवासी गांव घड़याच, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0 प्र0)
. . वादी।
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रतिवादीगण। इश्तहार मकफूद-उल-खबरी बाबत लापता व्यक्ति के वरास्त के इन्तकाल तस्दीक करने बारे।
इश्तहार बनाम आम जनता
इस इश्तहार द्वारा समस्त आम व खास विशेषतय गांव घड़याच, डा0 कुहंर, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन को सूचित किया जाता है कि वादी श्री मनशा राम पुत्र गोरखू पुत्र घुंघरू, निवासी गांव घड़याच, तहसील अर्की ने आवेदन किया है कि श्री रामदास पुत्र घुंघरू पुत्र मोलख रिश्ते में उसका चाचा है जो पिछले लगभग 45 वर्षों से लापता है इलाके में किसी ने भी उसे कहीं भी नहीं देखा है। वादी चाहता है कि उक्त रामदास की वरास्त का इन्तकाल उसके वारिस मनशा राम स्वयं के नाम तस्दीक कर दिया जाये। 4348 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 24 नवम्बर, 2014/3 अग्रहायण, 1936 इस इश्तहार द्वारा हर आम व खास तथा रामदास पुत्र घुंघरू के कोई अन्य वारिस यदि हैं को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को राम दास की जानकारी हो या वह स्वयं इसे पढ़े तो असालतन या वकालतन दिनांक 8-12-2014 को मुकाम पटवार भवन बखालग, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0 प्र0) में आकर अपने-अपने एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकते हैं अन्यथा राम दास पुत्र घुंघरू पुत्र मोलख की वरास्त का इन्तकाल उसके वारिस के नाम तस्दीक कर दिया जायेगा। उक्त तिथि के पश्चात् कोई उजर या एतराज काबिले समायत न होगा। कोई भी व्यक्ति इन्तकाल नं0 697 मौजा घड़याच में जो दर्ज किया गया है का अवलोकन पटवार वृत कुहंर में किसी भी कार्य दिवस में जाकर कर सकता है।
आज दिनांक 30-10-2014 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर तथा मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
गिरिश एम0 सकलानी, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग, अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0 प्र0)। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है