राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित बुधवार 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
लोक निर्माण विभाग
शुद्धि पत्र
शिमला-2, 12 दिसम्बर, 2016
सं0पी0बी0डब्ल्यू0(बी0)एफ(5)30/2015.-इस विभाग द्वारा भूमि अर्जन, पुनर्वास और पुर्नव्र्यवस्थापन में उचित प्रतिकर और पारदर्शिता अधिकार अधिनियम, 2013 (2013 का 30) की धारा 11 के अन्र्तगत जारी 175-राजपत्र/2016-14-12-2016 (6015) 6016 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938 समसंख्यक अधिसूचना दिनांक 29-09-2016 के अन्र्तगत गांव नावर, तहसील ठियोग, जिला शिमला, हिमाचल प्रदेश में बलदेहां-धर्मपुर-क्यारटू सड़क के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जित की जा रही है में "खसरा न0 720 रकबा 0-10-29 हैक्टयर के स्थान पर "खसरा न0 720 रकबा 0-18-29 हैक्टयर" पढ़ा जाए ।
आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- अति0 मुख्य सचिव (लोक निर्माण)।
---------
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OFFICE ORDER
Shimla–171002, the 12th December, 2016
No. PBW(B)F(1)2/2016.—Whereas the Govt. of HP for National Highway-22 through Revenue Village "Rabon" as per acquisition record and spot position with assistance of respective revenue agency prepared infrastructure map in accordance with the provisions contained in section- 4(2) & (4) of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under i.e. Rule of 2005.
And whereas due to declaration of this National Highway by Govt. of India under four laning project, the additional land was also required for its widening. As such acquisition proceedings under National Highway Act 1956 stood also completed by the National Highway Authority of India. Hence during initiation of widening work at spot, with regard to boundaries of the earlier acquired width depicted in Road Infrastructure map, various writ petition(s) by the adjoining land owners were filed before the Hon'ble High Court pertaining to this revenue village Rabon challenging therein the boundaries of the acquired width between R.D 12/630 to 13/480 K.M of NH-22.
And whereas to settle the issue in term of direction dated 9.05.2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWPIL 15/2014, joint re-verification of the spot by the designated officers of the revenue agency and HPPWD NH Division Solan and all other stakeholders was also carried out. As per said measurement the infrastructure map of the objected portion has also been appropriately modified/corrected at the spot with its complete status qua the re-verified boundaries of acquired width and encroachment of individual (petitioner) which is as under:
| Sr.No. | Case No. & Title | Area earlier identified to have been encroached under old Map of Acquired width | Encroached area upon re-verification of spot found by revenue agency |
| 1. | CWP 1531/2016 Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of HP. | 132 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | 1 bishwa of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 472/179/45 belonging to petitioner on which single storey house on valley side has been constructed. |
| 2. | CWP 1466/2016 Geeta Ram Tanwar Vs. State of HP. | 93 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 464/361/44 | 10 bishwansi of khasra No. 464/361/44 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 464/361/44/1 belonging to petitioner on which three storey house on valley side has been constructed. |
| 3. | CWP 1459/2016 Kshitinder Sharma Vs. Union of India & ors. | 132.8 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 53. | 1 bishwa of khasra No. 53 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 527/368/55/1 belonging to petitioner on which four storey house on valley side has been constructed. |
| 4. | CWP 1377/2016 Bimla Arora Vs. State of HP. | 48 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | 1 bishwa of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 487/214/45 belonging to petitioner on which two storey house structure on hill side has been constructed. |
| 5. | CWP 1376/2016 Shanti Swaroop Vs. State of HP & ors. | 21.9 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | Nil |
| 6. | CWP 1360/2016 Tarawati Vs. State of HP & ors. | 96 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | Nil |
| 7. | CWP 1358/2016 Ajesh Sharma Vs. State of HP & ors. | 78.75 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | 1 bishwa of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 484/213/45 belonging to petitioner on which five storey house structure on hill side has been constructed . |
| 8. | CWP 1357/2016 L.P. Gupta Vs. State of HP. | 156 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 | 1 bishwa of khasra No. 188/2, 3 & 180 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 513/193/45/1 belonging to petitioner on which two storey house structure on hill side has been constructed. |
Now therefore the infrastructure map qua RD 12/630 to 13/480 K.M of NH-22 has been appropriately amended/ corrected in view of Hon'ble High Court directions dated 9.05.2016 after re-verification of spot in the presence of all the stake holders. Hence after considering the objection(s) of the incumbent(s), the undersigned after exercising the power vested with me Sub Section of Section 4 of the of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 declare this infrastructure map as final which as such may be acted accordingly as per provisions contained in Sub-Section (5) of Section (4) of the ibid Act.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (PW).
_________
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OFFICE ORDER
Shimla–171002, the 12th December, 2016
No. PBW(B)F(1)2/2016.—Whereas the Govt. of HP for National Highway-22 through Revenue Village "Sihardi Chamara" as per acquisition record and spot position with assistance of respective revenue agency prepared infrastructure map in accordance with the provisions contained in section-4(2) & (4) of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under i.e. Rule of 2005.
6018 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938 And whereas due to declaration of this National Highway by Govt. of India under four laning project, the additional land was also required for its widening. As such acquisition proceedings under National Highway Act 1956 stood also completed by the National Highway Authority of India. Hence during initiation of widening work at spot, with regard to boundaries of the earlier acquired width depicted in Road Infrastructure map, various writ petition(s) by the adjoining land owners were filed before the Hon'ble High Court pertaining to this revenue village Sihardi Chamara challenging therein the boundaries of the acquired width between R.D 86/715 to 86/830 K.M of NH-22.
And whereas to settle the issue in term of direction dated 9.05.2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWPIL 15/2014, joint re-verification of the spot by the designated officers of the revenue agency and HPPWD NH Division Solan and all other stakeholders was also carried out. As per said measurement the infrastructure map of the objected portion has also been appropriately modified/corrected at the spot with its complete status qua the re-verified boundaries of acquired width and encroachment of individual (petitioner) which is as under:
| Sr.No. | Case No. & Title | Area earlier identified to have been encroached under old Map of Acquired width | Encroached area upon re-verification of spot found by revenue agency |
| 1. | CWP 2374/2016 Harsh Kumar Vs. State of HP. | Kh. No. 80/61/39 in the name and ownership of State of HP. | Status of petitioner is recorded as tenant on Govt. land. Land is in ownership of Govt. of H.P. As per Section 104 of H.P.T.L.R. Act 1972 he has no right in or over Kh.No. 80/61/39. |
| 2. | CWP 1379/2016 Vijay Kumari Vs. Vs. State of HP & ors. | 44.2 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 60/39 & 105/93/ 76/37/2. Besides Kh. No. 80/61/39 is in the ownership of Govt. of HP. | 6 sqm of khasra No. . 60/39 of NH. Status of petitioner is recorded as tenant on Govt. land. Land is in ownership of Govt. of H.P. As per Section 104 of H.P.T.L.R. Act 1972 he has no right in or over Kh.No. 80/61/39. |
| 3. | CWP 1375/2016 Narender Kumar Vs. State of HP. | 5.45 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 60/39 & 105/93/76/37/2. | Status of petitioner is recorded as tenant on Govt. land. Land is in ownership of Govt. of H.P. As per Section 104 of H.P.T.L.R. Act 1972 he has no right in or over Kh.No. 80/61/39. |
| 4. | CWP 1359/2016 Gurinder Dhingra Vs. State of HP & ors. | 8.25 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 60/39 | 5.50 sqm of khasra No. 60/39 of NH. Status of petitioner is recorded as tenant on Govt. land. Land is in ownership of Govt. of H.P. As per Section 104 of H.P.T.L.R. Act 1972 he has no right in or over Kh.No. 80/61/39. |
6019 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938 Now therefore the infrastructure map qua 86/715 to 86/830 K.M of NH-22 has been appropriately amended/ corrected in view of Hon'ble High Court directions dated 9.05.2016 after re-verification of spot in the presence of all the stake holders. Hence after considering the objection(s) of the incumbent(s), the undersigned after exercising the power vested with me Sub Section of Section 4 of the of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 declare this infrastructure map as final which as such may be acted accordingly as per provisions contained in Sub-Section (5) of Section (4) of the ibid Act.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (PW).
_________
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OFFICE ORDER
Shimla–171002, the 12th December, 2016
No. PBW(B)F(1)2/2016.—Whereas the Govt. of HP for National Highway-22 through Revenue Village "Kathed" as per acquisition record and spot position with assistance of respective revenue agency prepared infrastructure map in accordance with the provisions contained in section- 4(2) & (4) of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under i.e. Rule of 2005.
And whereas due to declaration of this National Highway by Govt. of India under four laning project, the additional land was also required for its widening. As such acquisition proceedings under National Highway Act 1956 stood also completed by the National Highway Authority of India. Hence during initiation of widening work at spot, with regard to boundaries of the earlier acquired width depicted in Road Infrastructure map, various writ petition(s) by the adjoining land owners were filed before the Hon'ble High Court pertaining to this revenue village Kathed challenging therein the boundaries of the acquired width between R.D 102/540 to 102/655 and 103/120 to 103/225 K.M of NH-22.
And whereas to settle the issue in term of direction dated 9.05.2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWPIL 15/2014, joint re-verification of the spot by the designated officers of the revenue agency and HPPWD NH Division Solan and all other stakeholders was also carried out. As per said measurement the infrastructure map of the objected portion has also been appropriately modified/corrected at the spot with its complete status qua the re-verified boundaries of acquired width and encroachment of individual (petitioner) which is as under:
| Sr.No. | Case No. & Title | Area earlier identified to have been encroached under old Map of Acquired width | Encroached area upon re-verification of spot found by revenue agency |
| 1. | CWP 1992/2016 Bishamber Nath Vs. State of HP. | 82 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 1420 | 36 sqm of khasra No. 1420 of NH adjoining to khasra No. 1867/1421, 1875/1422 belonging to petitioner on which four storey house on valley side has been constructed. |
| 2. | CWP 1348/2016 Hitender Singh Panwar Vs. State of HP. | 40 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 481/2 | Nil |
Now therefore the infrastructure map qua RD 102/540 to 102/655 and 103/120 to 103/225 K.M of NH-22 has been appropriately amended/corrected in view of Hon'ble High Court directions dated 9.05.2016 after re-verification of spot in the presence of all the stake holders. Hence after considering the objection(s) of the incumbent(s), the undersigned after exercising the power vested with me Sub Section of Section 4 of the of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 declare this infrastructure map as final which as such may be acted accordingly as per provisions contained in Sub-Section (5) of Section (4) of the ibid Act.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (PW).
_________
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OFFICE ORDER
Shimla–171002, the 12th December, 2016
No. PBW(B)F(1)2/2016.—Whereas the Govt. of HP for National Highway-22 through Revenue Village "Dharampur Bathol" as per acquisition record and spot position with assistance of respective revenue agency prepared infrastructure map in accordance with the provisions contained in section-4(2) & (4) of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under i.e. Rule of 2005.
And whereas due to declaration of this National Highway by Govt. of India under four laning project, the additional land was also required for its widening. As such acquisition proceedings under National Highway Act 1956 stood also completed by the National Highway Authority of India. Hence during initiation of widening work at spot, with regard to boundaries of the earlier acquired width depicted in Road Infrastructure map, various writ petition(s) by the adjoining land owners were filed before the Hon'ble High Court pertaining to this revenue village Dharampur Bathol 0challenging therein the boundaries of the acquired width between R.D 85/540 to 85/570 K.M of NH-22.
And whereas to settle the issue in term of direction dated 9.05.2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWPIL 15/2014, joint re-verification of the spot by the designated officers of the revenue agency and HPPWD NH Division Solan and all other stakeholders was also carried out. As per said measurement the infrastructure map of the objected portion has also been appropriately modified/corrected at the spot with its complete status qua the re-verified boundaries of acquired width and encroachment of individual (petitioner) which is as under:
| Sr.No. | Case No. & Title | Area earlier identified to have been encroached under old Map of Acquired width | Encroached area upon re-verification of spot found by revenue agency |
| 1. | CWP 1299/2016 Kuldeep Singh Vs. NHAI & ors. | 115.2 sq. mtr. of khasra No. 87 | re-verification done on spot in the presence of all stake holders on 22/10/2016 it has been found that entire |
| encroachment of petitioner on khasra No. 87, belonging to State Govt. as acquired width stands removed with nil encroachment now adjoining to khasra No. 202/1 belonging to petitioner on which five storey house on Hill side has been constructed. |
Now therefore the infrastructure map qua RD 85/540 to 85/570 K.M of NH-22 has been appropriately amended/ corrected in view of Hon'ble High Court directions dated 9.05.2016 after re-verification of spot in the presence of all the stake holders. Hence after considering the objection(s) of the incumbent(s), the undersigned after exercising the power vested with me Sub Section of Section 4 of the of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 declare this infrastructure map as final which as such may be acted accordingly as per provisions contained in Sub-Section (5) of Section (4) of the ibid Act.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (PW).
_________
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
OFFICE ORDER
Shimla–171002, the 12th December, 2016
No. PBW(B)F(1)2/2016.—Whereas the Govt. of HP for National Highway-22 through Revenue Village "Himmatpur Dabli" as per acquisition record and spot position with assistance of respective revenue agency prepared infrastructure map in accordance with the provisions contained in section-4(2) & (4) of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 and Rules framed there under i.e. Rule of 2005.
And whereas due to declaration of this National Highway by Govt. of India under four laning project, the additional land was also required for its widening. As such acquisition proceedings under National Highway Act 1956 stood also completed by the National Highway Authority of India. Hence during initiation of widening work at spot, with regard to boundaries of the earlier acquired width depicted in Road Infrastructure map, various writ petition(s) by the adjoining land owners were filed before the Hon'ble High Court pertaining to this revenue village Himmatpur Dabli challenging therein the boundaries of the acquired width between R.D 90/660 to 90/675 K.M of NH-22.
And whereas to settle the issue in term of direction dated 9.05.2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWPIL 15/2014, joint re-verification of the spot by the designated officers of the revenue agency and HPPWD NH Division Solan and all other stakeholders was also carried out. As per said measurement the infrastructure map of the objected portion has also been appropriately modified/corrected at the spot with its complete status qua the re-verified boundaries of acquired width and encroachment of individual (petitioner) which is as under:
6022 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938
| Sr.No. | Case No. & Title | Area earlier identified to have been encroached under old Map of Acquired width | Encroached area upon re-verification of spot found by revenue agency |
| 1. | CWP 1392/2016 Surinder Kumar Vs. State of HP & Ors. | 14.72 sqm of acquired width at RD 90/650 adjoining to Khasra No. 158/94. | Nil |
Now therefore the infrastructure map qua RD 90/660 to 90/675 K.M of NH-22 has been appropriately amended/ corrected in view of Hon'ble High Court directions dated 9.05.2016 after re-verification of spot in the presence of all the stake holders. Hence after considering the objection(s) of the incumbent(s), the undersigned after exercising the power vested with me Sub Section of Section 4 of the of HP Road Infrastructure Protection Act, 2002 declare this infrastructure map as final which as such may be acted accordingly as per provisions contained in Sub-Section (5) of Section (4) of the ibid Act.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (PW).
________
LANGUAGE, ART & CULTURE DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, the 13th December, 2016
No. LCD-A(4)-6/2016.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to constitute a Committee to examine all service related matter of Himachal Art, Culture and Language Academy, Shimla consisting of the following :--
1. Director, Language, Art and Culture Chairperson
2. Joint / Assistant Controller (F&A), LAC Member
3. Secretary, Himachal Art, Culture and Language Academy Member Secretary The committee shall examine all service related matters of the Academy such as age of retirement, probation period, amendments of R & P Rules, Filling up of vacant posts, reimbursement of medical claims on retirement, amendments in service rules etc. and shall submit its 1st report to the Government by 25th Dec, 2016.
By order, ANURADHA THAKUR, Secretary (LAC).
_______________________
ब अदालत श्री गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील रोहड़़ू,़ जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 श्री विनीत गिक्टू पुत्र श्री राम रछपाल, निवासी भरेटली, तहसील रोहडू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0
. . प्रार्थी। 6023 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938
बनाम
आम जनता
उनवान मुकद्दमा.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत। इस कार्यालय में श्री राम रछपाल पुत्र श्री केदार सिंह, निवासी भरेटली, तहसील रोहड़ू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 ने प्रार्थना-पत्र गुजार कर निवेदन किया है कि उसके पुत्र विनीत गिक्टू का जन्म दिनांक 04-10-1989 को हुआ है परन्तु अज्ञानतावश उसका नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव के जन्म रजिस्टर में आज तक पंजीकृत नहीं किया गया है तथा उसके नाम व जन्म तिथि को दर्ज करने के आदेश ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव को दिये जावें।
अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को भी उपरोक्त का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने में किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज व उजर हो तो वह दिनांक 15-12-2016 को असालतन व वकालतन हाजिर होकर लिखित व मौखिक प्रस्तुत करें। यदि उक्त तारीख तक कोई उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत नहीं हुआ तो यह समझा जावेगा कि प्रार्थी का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने हेतु कोई आपाि नहीं है तथा नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 30-11-2016 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रोहड़़ू़, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
--------
ब अदालत श्री गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील रोहड़़ू,़ जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 श्री अंकित गिक्टू पुत्र श्री राम रछपाल, निवासी भरेटली, तहसील रोहडू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0
. . प्रार्थी।
बनाम
आम जनता
उनवान मुकद्दमा.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत। इस कार्यालय में श्री राम रछपाल पुत्र श्री केदार सिंह, निवासी भरेटली, तहसील रोहड़ू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 ने प्रार्थना-पत्र गुजार कर निवेदन किया है कि उसके पुत्र अंकित गिक्टू का जन्म दिनांक 20-11-1991 को हुआ है परन्तु अज्ञानतावश उसका नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव के जन्म रजिस्टर में आज तक पंजीकृत नहीं किया गया है तथा उसके नाम व जन्म तिथि को दर्ज करने के आदेश ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव को दिये जावें।
अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को भी उपरोक्त का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने में किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज व उजर हो तो वह दिनांक 15-12-2016 को असालतन व वकालतन हाजिर होकर लिखित व मौखिक प्रस्तुत करें। यदि उक्त तारीख तक कोई उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत नहीं हुआ तो यह समझा जावेगा कि प्रार्थी का नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम 6024 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 14 दिसम्बर, 2016/23 अग्रहायण, 1938 पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने हेतु कोई आपाि नहीं है तथा नाम व जन्म तिथि ग्राम पंचायत दलगांव में दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 30-11-2016 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रोहड़़ू़, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।
--------
ब अदालत श्री गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील रोहड़़ू,़ जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 श्री अजीत कुमार पुत्र श्री राजू, निवासी नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू, तहसील रोहडू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0
. . प्रार्थी।
बनाम
आम जनता
उनवान मुकद्दमा.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत। इस कार्यालय में श्री अजीत कुमार पुत्र श्री राजू, निवासी नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू, तहसील रोहड़ू़ू, जिला शिमला, हि0 प्र0 ने प्रार्थना-पत्र गुजार कर निवेदन किया है कि उसका जन्म दिनांक 13-01-1992 को हुआ है परन्तु अज्ञानतावश उसका नाम व जन्म तिथि नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू के जन्म रजिस्टर में आज तक पंजीकृत नहीं किया गया है तथा उसके नाम व जन्म तिथि को दर्ज करने के आदेश नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू को दिये जावें। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को भी उपरोक्त का नाम व जन्म तिथि नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू में दर्ज करने में किसी भी प्रकार का एतराज व उजर हो तो वह दिनांक 15-12-2016 को असालतन व वकालतन हाजिर होकर लिखित व मौखिक प्रस्तुत करें। यदि उक्त तारीख तक कोई उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत नहीं हुआ तो यह समझा जावेगा कि प्रार्थी का नाम व जन्म तिथि नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू में दर्ज करने हेतु कोई आपाि नहीं है तथा नाम व जन्म तिथि नगर परिषद् रोहड़ू में दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 30-11-2016 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर।
गुरमीत जी0 नेगी, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रोहड़़ू़, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है