राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित वीरवार, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
लोक निर्माण विभाग
अधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 30 मई, 2017
संख्याःपी.बी.डब्लयू (बी)एफ(5)44/2010.--यतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल को यह प्रतीत होता है कि हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार को सरकारी व्यय पर सार्वजनिक प्रयोजन हेतु गांव ओडना, तहसील व जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश में सोलन-राजगढ़-बाई पास सड़क के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जित करनी अपेक्षित है, अत 44-राजपत्र/2017-01-06-2017 (1557) 1558 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 एव एतद् द्वारा यह घोषित किया जाता है कि निम्नलिखित विवरणी में वर्णित भूमि उपर्युक्त प्रयोजन के लिए अपेक्षित है।
2. यह घोषणा, भूमि अर्जन, पुनर्वास और पुर्नव्र्यवस्थापन में उचित प्रतिकर और पारदर्शिता अधिकार अधिनियम, 2013 (2013 का 30) की धारा-19 के उपबन्धों के अधीन इससे सम्बन्धित सभी व्यक्तियों को सूचना हेतु की जाती है तथा उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन भू-अर्जन समाहर्ता लोक निर्माण विभाग, विन्टर फिल्ड शिमला को उक्त भूमि के अर्जन करने के आदेश लेने का एतद् द्वारा निदेश दिया जाता है।
3. भूमि रेखांक का निरीक्षण भू-अर्जन समाहर्ता, लोक निर्माण विभाग विन्टर फिल्ड, शिमला के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है।
विवरणी
| जिला | तहसील | गांव | खसरा नम्बर | क्षेत्र (बीघा-विस्वा) |
| सोलन | सोलन | ओडना | 44/1 | 0-5 |
| कुल जोड़. . | किता-1 | 0-5 |
आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- अति0 मुख्य सचिव (लोक निर्माण)।
-------
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 21st December, 2016
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Dharam Pal S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Anubalh, P.O. Behli, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services during February, 2011.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether termination of services of Shri Dharam Pal S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Anubalh, P.O. Behli, Sub Tehsil Nihri, District Mandi, H.P. during February, 2011 by the 1559 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd December, 2016
No.11-5/93(Lab)ID/2013/Chamba.—Whereas Ms. Guhli Devi D/O Shri Mohan Lal, R/O Village Udaini, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 02-01-2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum- Conciliation Officer Chamba Zone, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba Zone, Chamba was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 27-06-2013;
And whereas Ms. Guhli Devi D/O Shri Mohan Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1222/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 13-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-
"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial 1560 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the alleged termination of services of Ms. Guhli Devi D/O Shri Mohan Lal, R/O Village Udaini, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2000 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 11 years vide demand notice dated 02-01-2012, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 11 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd December, 2016
No.11-5/93(Lab)ID/2013/Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hari Nath S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Tatan, P.O. Karyas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30-12-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum- Conciliation Officer Chamba Zone, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba Zone, Chamba was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 07 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 05-06-2013;
And whereas Shri Hari Nath S/O Shri Ram Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1222/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 13-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—
"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if
any."
1561 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Hari Nath S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Tatan, P.O. Karyas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30-12-2011, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 30th December, 2016
No.:11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Haria Ram S/O Shri Jogal Ram, R/O Village Kyan, P.O. Khurahal, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 14-05-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during year, 1998 before the above employer after delay of about 17 years.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006- 1562 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue/issues:—
"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Haria Ram S/O Shri Jogal Ram, R/O Village Kyan, P.O. Khurahal, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 1998 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 14-05-2015 after delay of about 17 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of about 17 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management? "
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th December, 2016
No.11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Jai Devi W/O Shri Gurdas, R/O V.P.O. Sari, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Engineer-in- Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii)the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 07-06-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding her alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 1999 before the above employer after delay of more than 15 years.
Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the1563 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue/issues:—
"Whether alleged termination of the services of Smt. Jai Devi W/O Shri Gurdas, R/O V.P.O. Sari, Sub Tehsil Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 1999 by (i) the Engineer-in-Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 07-06-2015 after delay of more than 15 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 15 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 5th April, 2017
No.: 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Jarnail Singh, S/O Shri Kishan Singh, R/O V.P.O. Bangarh, District Una, H.P. and the General Manager, M/S Industrial Engineering Corporation, 51-B, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his daily wages services w.e.f. 24-06-2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether termination of the services of Shri Jarnail Singh, S/O Shri Kishan Singh, R/O V.P.O. Bangarh, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 24-06-2015 by the General Manager, M/S Industrial Engineering Corporation, 51-B, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal1564 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd December, 2016
No.:11-5/93(Lab)ID/2013/Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Jaywanti W/O Shri Janak Raj, R/O Village Kuthal, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 08-12-2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum- Conciliation Officer Chamba Zone, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba Zone, Chamba was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 08-01-2016;
And whereas Smt. Jaywanti W/O Shri Janak Raj agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1222/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 13-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—
"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight
weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."
Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the alleged termination of services of Smt. Jaywanti W/O Shri Janak Raj, R/O Village Kuthal, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 1565 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.PW.D./I.&P.H., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 08-12-2011, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd December, 2016
No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Lunder, P.O. Khel, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;
And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31-08-2013;
And whereas Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 464/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment titled Raghubir Singh versus General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Hissar, reported in 2014 AIR SCW 5515, and the same has been relied upon by the Division Benches of this Court in CWP No. 6687 of 2014, decided on 24-09-2014. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—
"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ
petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ
petition is diposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications,if any."
1566 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Joginder Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Lunder, P.O. Khel, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during August, 1987 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 23 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/ management?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th December, 2016
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Kambli Devi W/O Shri Bhagi Ram, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Engineer-in-Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii)the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on 10-03-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding her alleged termination of services.
Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.
Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services w.e.f. 01-10-1999 before the above employer after delay of more than 15 years.
1567 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue/issues:—
"Whether alleged termination of the services of Smt. Kambli Devi W/O Shri Bhagi Ram, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01-10-1999 by (i) the Engineer-in-Chief, H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Mandi on 10-03-2015 after delay of more than 15 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 15 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 31st December, 2016
No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Kashalaya Devi W/O Shri Kamlesh Kumar, R/O Village Tarjhun, P.O. Majhar Kelodhar, Tehsil Chachyot, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Nachan Forest Division at Gohar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of her services during September, 2015.
As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether termination of services of Smt. Kashalaya Devi W/O Shri Kamlesh Kumar, R/O Village Tarjhun, P.O. Majhar Kelodhar, Tehsil Chachyot, District Mandi, H.P. during1568 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 September, 2015 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Nachan Forest Division at Gohar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
__________
सिंचाई एवं जनस्वास्थ्य विभाग
अधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 31 मई, 2017
संख्याः आई.पी.एच.-ए-ए(3)-1/2017.--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, भारत के संविधान के अनुच्छेद 309 के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श से, इस विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्याः आई0पी0एच0-ए-(3)-13/94 तारीख 02/04/1997 द्वारा अधिसूचित हिमाचल प्रदेश सिंचाई एवं जनस्वास्थ्य विभाग, अधिशासी अभियन्ता (सिविल), वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित) भर्ती एवम् प्रोन्नति नियम, 1997 में और संशोधन करने के लिए निम्नलिखित नियम बनाते हैं, अर्थात् :--
1. स्ांक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.--(1) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश सिंचाई एवं जनस्वास्थ्य विभाग अधिशासी अभियन्ता (सिविल), वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित) भर्ती एवम् प्रोन्नति (तृतीय संशोधन) नियम, 2017 है।
(2) ये नियम राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशित किए जाने की तारीख से प्रवृत्त होंगे। 2. उपाबंध ''क'' का संशोधन.--(1) हिमाचल प्रदेश सिंचाई एवं जनस्वास्थ्य विभाग अधिशासी अभियन्ता (सिविल), वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित), भर्ती एवम् प्रोन्नति नियम, 1997 के उपाबंध ''क'' में :-- (1) स्तम्भ संख्याः 2 के सामने विद्यमान उपबन्ध के स्थान पर निम्नलिख्ति रखा जाएगा, अर्थात् :
''80 (अस्सी)''. ;
(2) स्तम्भ संख्याः 4 के सामने विद्यमान उपबन्ध के स्थान पर निम्नलिख्ति रखा जाएगा, अर्थात् :-- ''15,600-39,100 रुपए 7600 (ग्रेड पे)'';
(3) स्तम्भ संख्याः 10 के विद्यमान शीर्षक के स्थान पर निम्नलिख्ति रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्ः-- भर्ती की पद्धति; भर्ती सीधी होगी या प्रोन्नति, सैकण्डमैंट/स्थानान्तरण द्वारा और विभिन्न पद्धतियों द्वारा भरे जाने वाले पद(पदों) की प्रतिशतता। '' ; और :
1569 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 (4) स्तम्भ संख्याः 11 के सामने उपबन्धों में "31-3-1998 तक" अंक और शब्द जहां कहीं भी आतेहैं, का लोप किया जाएगा।
आदेश द्वारा, अनुराधा ठाकुर,
प्रधान सचिव (सिं0 एवं जन स्वा0)।
-------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. IPH-A-A(3)-1/2017, dated
31-5-2017 as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India].
IRRIGATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 31st May, 2017
No. IPH-A-A (3)-1/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the following rules further to amend the Himachal Pradesh Department of Irrigation and Public Health Executive Engineer (Civil), Class-I (Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 1997 notified vide this Department Notification No. IPH-A (3)-13/94, dated 2-4-1997, namely :—
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called Himachal Pradesh, Irrigation and Public Health Department, Executive Engineer (Civil) (Class-I-Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion (Third Amendment) Rules, 2017.
(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.
2. Amendment of Annexure "A".—(2) In Annexure "A" to the Himachal Pradesh Department Irrigation and Public Health, Executive Engineer (Civil), (Class-I Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 1997)
(1) for the existing provision against Col. No. 2, the following shall be substituted, namely:—
"80 (Eighty)". ;
(2) for the existing provision against Col. No.4, the following shall be substituted, namely:—
"Rs.15600-39100+7600 (Grade Pay)". ;
(3) for the existing title of Col. No. 10, the following shall be substituted, namely:—
"Method of recruitment; whether by direct recruitment or by promotion, secondment, transfer and the percentage of posts to be filled in by various methods.".; and 1570 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 (4) In the existing provisions against Col. No.11, the words and figures, "upto 31-3-1998" wherever accuring shall be deleted.
By order, ANURADHA THAKUR, Principal Secretary (I&PH).
__________
गृह विभाग
अधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 30 मई, 2017
संख्याः गृह(ए)बी(1)-20/2015.--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश पुलिस अधिनियम, 2007 (2007 का अधिनियम संख्याक 17) की धारा 11 की उपधारा (1) के साथ पठित दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 की धारा 2 के खण्ड (ध) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, पुलिस महानिदेशक के परामर्श से, इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र (ई-गजट) हिमाचल प्रदेश मेें प्रकाशित किए जाने की तारीख से, निम्नलिखित अनूसूची की स्तम्भ संख्याः 3 में यथा वर्णित गांवों को स्तम्भ संख्याः 4 में वर्णित पुलिस थाना के स्थानीय क्षेत्र से स्तम्भ संख्याः 5 में वर्णित पुलिस थाना के स्थानीय क्षेत्र के लिए अन्तरित करते हैं, अर्थातः--
अनुसूची
| क्रम स ं ख्या | ग्राम पंचायतों के नाम | स्तम्भ संख्या 2 में विनिर्दिष्ट ग्राम पंचायत में अन्तर्विष्ट गांवों के नाम | पुलिस थाना जिससे, इस अधिसूचना द्वारा अन्तरित किए जाने हैं | पुलिस थाना, जिसमें इसके पश्चात् सम्मिलित होंगे |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. | ग्राम पंचायत, गगल | 1. गगल खास | पुलिस थाना कांगड़ा | पुलिस थाना गगल |
| 2. | ग्राम पंचायत, झिकली ईच्छी | 1. ईच्छी 2. बाग 3. नागन 4. मगरेहड 5. बसवालकड 6. ईच्छी खास (मस्तपुर) 7. झिकली ईच्छी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 3. | ग्राम पंचायत, सहौड़ा | 1. सहौड़ा 2. पैग 3. बल्ला | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 4. | ग्राम पंचायत, अनसोली | 1. अनसोली 2. घुण्डी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 5. | ग्राम पंचायत, बैदी | 1. बैदी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 6. | ग्राम पंचायत, भडियाडा | 1. भडियाड़ा 2. गवली ठेहड़ 3. सुरालकड़ 4. मकडोली 5. ठेहड़ | पुलिस थाना कांगड़ा | पुलिस थाना गगल |
| 7. | ग्राम पंचायत, तियारा | 1. तियारा 2. बलहूं 3. बल्ला 4. पटटी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 8. | ग्राम पंचायत, समीरपुर खास | 1. समीरपुर 2. देहरियां 3. कियारग 4. भटेहड | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 9. | ग्राम पंचायत, समीरपुर चकवन | 1. समीरपुर चकवन 2. जोगी बल्ला 3. चकलू 4. आईमा 5. लाहड़ 6. त्रैगलू | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 10. | ग्राम पंचायत, सलोल | 1. सलोल 2. चतरेटा 3. भसहेड़ | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 11. | ग्राम पंचायत, तरखानकड़ | 1. तरखानकड 2. बासी 3. करियाला 4. उपरला चतरेटा 5. झीरबल्ला | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 12. | ग्राम पंचायत, ढुगियारी | 1. ढुगियारी खास 2. झिकली ढुगियारी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 13. | ग्राम पंचायत, सनौरां | 1. सनौरां 2. भेड़ी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 14. | ग्राम पंचायत, मेहरना | 1. मेहरना 2. खड़ियाड़ा 3. त्रैम्बला | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 15. | ग्राम पंचायत, रच्छियालू | 1. रच्छियालू 2 क्योड़ियां | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 16. | ग्राम पंचायत, रजोल | 1. रजोल 2. थड़ा 3. महाकाली | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 17. | ग्राम पंचायत, मकरोटी | 1. मकरोटी 2. गगल | पुलिस थाना कांगड़ा | पुलिस थाना गगल |
| 18 | ग्राम पंचायत, कुठमां | 1. कुठमां 2. बैंटलू 3. बनोई 4 जगहेड़ | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 19. | ग्राम पंचायत, अम्बाड़ी | 1. अम्बाड़ी 2. डोला 3. केटलू 4. भाटी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 20. | ग्राम पंचायत, कंदरेहड़ | 1. कदंरेहड़ 2. पटौला | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 21. | ग्राम पंचायत, मन्दल | 1. मन्दल 2. भड़वाल | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 22. | ग्राम पंचायत, बगली | 1. बगली 2. गगली 3. चैतडू कलोनी | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 23. | ग्राम पंचायत, घणा | 1. उपरला घणा 2. निचला घणा 3. गंगभैंरो | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 24. | ग्राम पंचायत, चैतडू | 1. चैतडू 2. बनवाला 3. गाडम्बा | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 25. | ग्राम पंचायत, ढगवार | 1. ढगवार 2. मटट 3. त्रैम्बलू 4. चकवन ढगवार 5. खटेहड़ 6. मसरेहड़ | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 26. | ग्राम पंचायत, झियोल | 1. झियोल 2. घियाणा खुर्द 3. बडाखोला | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 27. | ग्राम पंचायत, कनेड़ | 1. कनेड़ 2. ब्रैह 4. दुडेहड़ 5. जगरेहड़ 6. घड़ोपरा | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 28. | ग्राम पंचायत, मनेड़ | 1. मनेड | पुलिस थाना कांगड़ा | पुलिस थाना गगल |
| 29. | ग्राम पंचायत, बरवाला | 1. बरवाला 2. छैन्टी 4. घियाणा कलां 5. ठम्बा | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 30. | ग्राम पंचायत, बण्डी | 1. बण्डी खास 2. घरथेहड़ 3. बण्डी खुर्द | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
| 31. | ग्राम पंचायत, नागनपट्ट | 1. नागनपट्ट | -यथोपरि- | -यथोपरि- |
आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- प्रधान सचिव (गृह)।
-------
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Home-(A)B(1)-20/2015 dated,
30th May, 2017 as required under clause (3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India].
HOME DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 30th May, 2017
No. Home-(A)B(1)-20/2015.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (s) of section 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Himachal Pradesh Police Act, 2007 (Act No. 17 of 2007), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with Director General of Police, is pleased to transfer the villages as enumerated in Column No. 3 from the local area of the Police Station mentioned in Column No.4 to the local area of the Police Station mentioned in Column No.5 of the Schedule given below thereof, with effect from the date of publication of this Notification in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette), Himachal Pradesh, namely:—
SCHEDULE
| Sr. No. | Name of Gram Panchayats | Name of Villages contained in Gram Panchayat specified in Column No. 2 | Police Station from which transferred by this notification. | Police Station in which hereinafter included. |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. | Gram Panchayat, Gaggal | 1. Gaggal Khas | Police Station Kangra | Police Station Gaggal |
| 2. | Gram Panchayat, Jhikli Ichhi | 1. Ichhi 2. Bag 3 Nagan 4. Mugrehar 5 Baswalkad 6 Ichhi Khas (Mastpur) 7 Jhikli Ichhi | Police Station Kangra | Police Station Gaggal |
| 3. | Gram Panchayat, Sahoura | 1. Sahoura 2. Pagh 3. Balla | -do- | -do- |
| 4. | Gram Panchayat, Ansoli | 1. Ansoli 2. Ghundi | -do- | -do- |
| 5. | Gram Panchayat, Baidi | 1. Baidi | -do- | -do- |
| 6. | Gram Panchayat, Bhadiyara | 1. Bhadiyara 2. Gabli Thehar 3. Suralked 4. Makdoli 5 Thehar | -do- | -do- |
| 7. | Gram Panchayat, Tiara | 1. Tiara 2. Balhun 3. Balla 4 Patti | -do- | -do- |
| 8. | Gram Panchayat, Samirpur Khas | 1. Samirpur 2. Dehrian 3. Kiyarag 4. Bhatteher | -do- | -do- |
| 9. | Gram Panchayat, Samirpur Chakwan | 1. Samirpur Chakwan 2. Jogiballa 3. Chakloo 4. Aiema 5. Lahar 6. Treglu | -do- | -do- |
| 10. | Gram Panchayat, Salol | 1. Salol 2. Chatreta 3. Bhasher | -do- | -do- |
| 11. | Gram Panchayat, Tarkhankad | 1. Tarkhankad 2. Bassi 3. Kariyala 4. Uperla Chatreta 5. Jheerballa | -do- | -do- |
| 12. | Gram Panchayat, Dugiyari | 1. Dugiyari Khas 2. Jhikli Dugiyari | -do- | -do- |
| 13. | Gram Panchayat, Sanouran | 1. Sanouran 2. Bheri | Police Station Kangra | Police Station Gaggal |
| 14. | Gram Panchayat, Mehrna | 1. Mehrna 2. Khadiyada 3. Trembla | -do- | -do- |
| 15. | Gram Panchayat, Rachhiyalu | 1. Rachhiyalu 2. Kyorian | -do- | -do- |
| 16. | Gram Panchayat, Rajol | 1. Rajol 2. Thara 3. Mahakali | -do- | -do- |
| 17. | Gram Panchayat, Makroti | 1. Makroti 2. Gaggal | -do- | -do- |
| 18. | Gram Panchayat, Kuthman | 1. Kuthman 2. Bentlu 3. Banoi 4. Jagher | -do- | -do- |
| 19. | Gram Panchayat, Ambari | 1. Ambari 2. Dola 3. Ketlu 4. Bhatti | -do- | -do- |
| 20. | Gram Panchayat, Kandrehad | 1. Kandrehad 2. Patoula | -do- | -do- |
| 21. | Gram Panchayat, Mandal | 1. Mandal 2. Bhadwal | -do- | -do- |
| 22. | Gram Panchayat, Bagli | 1. Bagli 2. Gagli 3 Chetru Colony | -do- | -do- |
| 23. | Gram Panchayat, Ghana | 1. Uprela Ghana 2. Nichla Ghana 3. Gang Bhairon | -do- | -do- |
| 24. | Gram Panchayat, Chetru | 1. Chetru 2. Banwala 3 Gadamba | -do- | -do- |
| 25. | Gram Panchayat, Dhagwar | 1. Dhagwar 2. Matt 3. Tremblu 4. Chakwan Dagwar 5. Khatehar 6. Masrehar | -do- | -do- |
| 26. | Gram Panchayat, Jheol | 1. Jheol 2. Ghiyana Khurd 3. Badakhola | Police Station Kangra | Police Station Gaggal |
| 27. | Gram Panchayat, Kaned | 1. Kaned 2. Bareh 3. Dudehar 4. Jagrehar 5. Gadopra | -do- | -do- |
| 28. | Gram Panchayat, Maned | 1. Maned | -do- | -do- |
| 29. | Gram Panchayat, Barwala | 1. Barwala 2. Chhainti 3. Ghiyana Kalan 4. Thamba | -do- | -do- |
| 30. | Gram Panchayat, Bandi | 1. Bandi Khas 2 Gherthehar 3. Bandi Khurd | -do- | -do- |
| 31. | Gram Panchayat, Naganpatt | 1. Naganpatt | -do- | -do- |
By order, Sd/- Principal Secretary (Home).
--------
HOME DEPARTMENT
ORDER
Shimla-171002, the 16th May, 2017
No.Home(A)-A(3)-3/2012-I.—In continuation and partial modification of this department's order number Home-(A)-A (3)-3/2012-I dated 10-06-2016 and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 26 and 37 of the Himachal Pradesh Police Act, 2007, (Act No. 17 of 2017), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to make the following amendment/order to specify Uniform and Badges for Non-Gazetted Police Officers Grade-1 and Grade-II of Himachal Pradesh Police Department namely;
1. Short titled application and Commencement.—(1) This Order may be called the Himachal Pradesh Police Department Uniform and Badges Order, 2016
(2) This Order shall be applicable to the Non- Gazetted-Police Officers Grade-I and Grade-II of the Police Department Himachal Pradesh.
(3) This Order shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
2. Muster pattern of supply of Articles of Uniform.—The Non-Gazetted Police Officers shall be supplied Uniform and Equipment articles as specified in following table.
1577 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 MUSTER PATTERN FOR ARTICLES TO BE ISSUED PERMANENTLY| Sr. No. | Name of item | Existing | Approved |
| 1. | Ankle Boot- Black & Tan Brown | i) Ankle Boot Brown rubber Sole(DMS) army pattern (NGO Grade-1 & Distts. & Bns. ii) Ankle Boot Black rubber Sole(DMS) army pattern (NGO Grade-II, Distts. & Bns. | Ankle Boot-Black & Tan Brown as per specifications used by CAPFs/defense forces with additional features of anti- skid grip and energy absorption for state police personnel in view of climate and hilly terrain of the state (for N GO Grade-I & II, Distts./Bns.). |
| 2. | Derby Shoes-Black & Tan Brown | Derby shoes-Brown rubber sole(NGO Grade-I District police & Bns. Derby shoes-Black rubber sole(NGO Grade-II District Police & Bns.) | Derby Shoes Black/Brown with additional features of anti-skid grip and energy absorption for state police personnel in view of climate and hilly terrain of the state (for Ngo Grade-I & II Distt./Bns.) |
| 3. | PT Shoes | P.T. shoes white canvas rubber sole with fabric laces. | P.T. running shoes |
| 4. | Hunter Boot | Hunter Boot (Jungle boot) O.G. colour (for remote areas at 9000 feet & above) in place of P.T. shoes. | Hunter Boot (jungle boot) O.G. colour (for remote areas at 9000 feet & above) in place of P.T. running shoes. |
| 5. | Angola Cloth | Angola cloth conforming superior quality cloth wrinkle free khaki or any other colour width 152 cms. full sleeves NGOs pattern open with two breast pockets with flaps 4 tich buttons. 12 buttons khaki for distts. Armed police traffic | Superior quality cloth, wrinkle free, khaki or any other colour, full sleeves, NGOs pattern, open with two breast pockets with flaps 4 tich buttons. 12 buttons khaki for Districts/Armed Police Traffic, width 152 cms. Composition 50% wool & 50% polyester |
| 6. | Jacket for winter | Conforming to IS specification No. 3361:1979 with word "Police" in Golden Yellow on back | Colour and specification of outer cloth of jacket should match with the Terrycot cloth, in use, with the word POLICE in golden yellow on back |
This issues with the prior concurrence of F.D obtained vide their Dy. No. Fin(C)-A(3)- 14/2016 dated 06-05-2017
By order, Sd/ Principal Secretary (Home).
1578 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 सिंचाई एवं जन स्वास्थ्य विभागअधिसूचना
शिमला-2, 27 मई, 2017
संख्याःआई.पी.एच.-बी(एच)1-30/2013-शिमला.--यतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल कोेेे यह प्रतीत होता है कि हिमाचल प्र्र्र्रदेश सरकार को सरकारी व्यय पर सार्वजनिक प्रयोजन हेतु नामतः गांव गोलछा तहसील शिमला (ग्र्र्र्रा0) जिला शिमला, हिमाचल प्रदेश मेंंंं मल निकासी योजना के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जित करनी अपक्षित है, अतएव एतद्््् द्वारा यह घाषित किया जाता है कि निम्नलिखित विवरणी मेेंेंेंं वर्र्णित भमि उपर्युक्त प्र्र्र्रयोजन के लिए अपक्षित है।
2. यह घोषणा, भूमि अर्जन, पुनर्वास और पुनव्र्यवस्थापन मेंंंंंं उचित प्रतिकर और पारदर्र्र्शिता अधिकार अधिनियम, 2013 (2013 का 30) की धारा-19 केेेेेे उपबन्धों के अधीन इससे सम्बन्धित सभी व्यक्तियों को सूचना हेतु की जाती है तथा उक्त अधिनियम के अधीन भू-समाहर्ता समाहर्ता, लोक निर्माण विभाग, विन्टर फिल्ड शिमला कोेेेेे उक्त भूमि के अर्जन करनेेेेेे के आदेश लेने का एतदद्वारा निदेश दिया जाता है। 3. भूमि रेखांक का निरीक्षण भू-अर्जन समाहर्ता लोक निर्र्र्माण विभाग, विन्टर फिल्ड शिमला के कार्यालय में किया जा सकता है।
विस्तृृृृृृृत विवरणी
| जिला | तहसील | गांव | खसरा नं0 | क्षेत्र बीघे/हैक्टयर/बिस्वे मे ं |
| शिमला | शिमला (ग्रा0) | गोलछा | 405/1 | 0-01-59 |
आदेश द्वारा, अनुराधा ठाकुर, प्रधान सचिव (सिंचाई एवं जन स्वास्थ्य)।
-------
In the Court of Shri Hemis Negi, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
Smt. Somo Devi w/o Shri Bandhan Oraon, r/o Para Dass Garden Kanlog, Shimla, Tehsil . . Applicant. and District Shimla, H.P.
Versus
General Public
.. Respondent.
Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.
Whereas Smt. Somo Devi w/o Shri Bandhan Oraon, r/o Para Dass Garden Kanlog, Shimla, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P. has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration the date of birth of her daughters namely Miss Khusboo (DOB 14-4-2004) and Miss Muskan (DOB 24-5-2007) and son Mr. Ashish Oraon (DOB 28-3-2011) in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.
1579 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939Therefore, this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having and objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in this court on or before 26-06-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date and will be decided accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 26th day of May, 2017.
Seal.
HEMIS NEGI, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban).
____________
In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),
District Shimla (H. P.)
Shri Daleep s/o Shri Dharam Prakash, r/o Village Neen, P.O. Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Versus
[
General Public
. . Respondent.
Whereas Shri Daleep s/o Shri Dharam Prakash, r/o Village Neen, P.O. Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the date of birth of his son named—Mr. Hitesh Kumar s/o Shri Daleep s/o Shri Dharam Prakash, r/o Village Neen, P.O. Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Gram Panchayat Neen, Shimla.
| Sl. No. | Name of the family member | Relation | Date of Birth |
| 1. | Mr. Hitesh Kumar | Son | 23-08-1995 |
Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim regarding entry of the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Gram Panchayat Neen, Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.
Issued today 26-05-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.
Seal.
GIAN SAGAR NEGI, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R), District Shimla.
1580 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 1 जून, 2017/11 ज्येष्ठ, 1939ब अदालत श्री उत्तम चन्द शर्मा, तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता (प्रथम वर्ग) सोलन, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश
28-06-2017 वाद संख्या : तारीख दायरा तारीख पेशी 15-03-2017 4/13B of 17
श्री आत्मा राम पुत्र श्री लालू राम, निवासी गांव मजाथरु, डा0 हरीपूर, तहसील व जिला सोलन, हि0 प्र0
. . प्रार्थी
बनाम
. . प्रतिवादी आम जनता
विषय.--कागजात माल में नाम दरुस्ती करवाने बारे।
श्री आत्मा राम पुत्र श्री लालू राम, निवासी गांव मजाथरु, डा0 हरीपूर, तहसील व जिला सोलन, हि0 प्र0 ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र इस आशय से पेश किया है कि राजस्व अभिलेख मोहाल मजाथरु, खाता खतौनी नं0 1/1 में उसका नाम सदीक पुत्र श्री लालू दर्ज है जो कि गलत है जिसकी दरूस्ती किये जाने हेतु निवेदन किया गया है। प्रार्थी द्वारा अपने उक्त कथन के सन्दर्भ में शपथ पत्र, विद्यालय त्याग प्रमाण पत्र, पंचायत परिवार रजिस्टर, निर्वाचन प्रमाण पत्र की प्रतियां पेश की है जिसमें उसका नाम आत्मा राम पुत्र श्री लालू दर्ज है।
अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा सर्वसाधारण को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त नाम की दरुस्ती बारे कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 28-06-2017 को दोपहर बाद 2.00 बजे असालतन या वकालतन अपना उजर/एतराज हाजिर अदालत आ कर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा श्री आत्मा राम पुत्र श्री लालू प्रार्थी द्वारा दिया गया प्रार्थना पत्र स्वीकार किया जा कर राजस्व रिकार्ड में प्रार्थी का नाम सदीक के वजाये श्री आत्मा राम पुत्र श्री लालू दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।
आज दिनांक 16-05-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर से जारी किया गया।
मोहर।
उत्तम चन्द शर्मा, तहसीलदार एवं सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम वर्ग, सोलन, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है