Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 49, 07 June 2017

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित बुधवार, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 24th November, 2016

No.11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen, R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011 regarding his illegal termination 49-राजपत्र/2017-07-06-2017 (1999) 2000 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 21 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31-08-2013;

And whereas Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 496/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 19-03-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:-

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if

any."

Therefore in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Hanif S/O Shri Roj Deen, R/O Village Nihad, P.O. Aund, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 21 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

2001 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 15th November, 2016

No.11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh, R/O Village Danna, P.O. Khawara, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06-2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 04-04-2015;

And whereas Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1249/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Harbans Singh S/O Shri Bhag Singh, R/O Village Danna, P.O. Khawara, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after about 22 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 13-06- 2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of about 22 years in raising the industrial dispute,2002 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016

No.11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Kaku Ram S/O Shri Mahesh Chand, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 1990 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked only for 4, 33, 79 and 76 days during the years 1987, 1988, 1989 and 1990 respectively.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue/issues:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kaku Ram S/O Shri Mahesh Chand, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 1990 by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015 after delay of more than 24 years, without complying with the provisions of2003 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period for 4, 33, 79 and 76 days during the years 1987,1988,1989 and 1990 and delay of more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Kaliyan Singh S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kaliyan Singh S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during August,2004 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 1990 by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Chamba on 01-05-2015 after delay of more than 24 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 51 and 113 days during June, 1989 to August, 1990 and delay of more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh, R/O V.P.O. Khwada, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 27-04-2015;

And whereas Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1234/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

2005 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kartar Singh S/O Shri Pritam Singh, R/O V.P.O. Khwada, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 23 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh, R/O Village Barnoli, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21-04-2015;

And whereas Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1233/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh 2006 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kikar Singh S/O Shri Gurudev Singh, R/O Village Barnoli, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 22 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03- 2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 19th November, 2016

No.:11-1/85(Lab)ID/2016/Kangra.—Whereas Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Nagni, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated nil received in Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03-2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P.The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he has sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala was considered, examined and the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh2007 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 22 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21-04-2015;

And whereas Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide CWP No. 1253/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the CWP on dated 15-06-2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court in C.W.P. No. 9467 of 2014, titled as Pratap Chand Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows:—

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether the alleged termination of services of Shri Kushal Ram S/O Shri Bhagat Ram, R/O Village Nagni, P.O. Bhadwar, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during year, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. (ii) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D., Division Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked on daily wages as beldar and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 22 years vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Kangra at Dharamshala on 04-03- 2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st November, 2016

No.:11-1/18(Lab)ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Liyakat Ali, President J.L. Nehru Engineering College Workers Union, O/o House No. 339/4, Salah, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the 2008 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Principal, J.N. Government Engineering College, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P.(Principal employer) (ii) M/S Nuvision Commercial Escorts Private Limited, Ashirwad Sadan, Highway Heaven, Mehli, Shimla (contractor) on the issue of alleged termination of his services w.e.f. 31-01- 2015.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Government of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IVLoose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Liyakat Ali, President J.L. Nehru Engineering College Workers Union, O/o House No. 339/4, Salah, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and other workers w.e.f. 31-01-2015 as alleged vide demand notice dated 19-02-2015 (copy enclosed) by (i) the Principal, J.N. Government Engineering College, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. (Principal employer) (ii) M/S Nuvision Commercial Escorts Private Limited, Ashirwad Sadan, Highway Heaven, Mehli, Shimla (contractor) without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above workers are entitled to from the above employers/Management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th November, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Jagat Ram through the General Secretary, District Committee, AITUC, HQ CHEP Stage-II, Karian, P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during December, 2009 to August, 2014 and finally during September, 2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power2009 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Jagat Ram, through the General Secretary, District Committee, AITUC, HQ CHEP Stage-II, Karian, P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2009 to August, 2014 and finally during September, 2014 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chamba Forest Division, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11th November, 2016

No.:11-5/99(Lab)ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri Lal Singh, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated 27-08-2015 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his alleged termination of services.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during January, 1991 before the above employer after delay of more than 24 years and has worked during March, 1987 and December, 1990 respectively.

2010 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006- IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue/issues:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Paras Ram S/O Shri Lal Singh, R/O Village Kamla, P.O. Garnota, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during January, 1991 by the Additional Superintending Engineer, Electrical Division H.P.S.E.B.L., Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-08-2015 after delay of more than 24 years, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from March, 1987 to December, 1990 and delay of more than 24 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 31st May, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.10(155)/92-XVII.—In continuation of this Registry Notification No.HHC/ Admn.10(155)/92-XVII-9493-527, dated 19-04-2016 and in exercise of powers vested in Hon'ble the Chief Justice under section 5(2) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2016), Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to order that 'Commercial Appellate Division' shall consist of three Division Benches and the Judges of the Principal Division Benches, as per Roster, are hereby nominated to be the Judges of the 'Commercial Appellate Division'.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

2011 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 31st May, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.10(155)/92-XVII.—In continuation of this Registry Notification No.HHC/ Admn.10(155)/92-XVII-9458-92, dated 19-04-2016 and in exercise of powers vested in Hon'ble the Chief Justice under section 4(2) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2016), Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to nominate the following Hon'ble Judges to be the Judges of the two Commercial Division (Single Benches):

1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge,

2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 2nd June, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.6 (20)/77-XVIII.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to nominate Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, as the Vacation Judge, for urgent court work during the Summer Vacation from 05-6-2017 to 09-6-2017.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 30th May, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.16 (9)74-IX.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment & Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Aman Thakur, Sh. Ravi Kumar, Sh. Naresh 2012 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Kumar, Ms. Tina Kumari, Sh. Kulbhushan Jamwal, Sh. Jatender, Sh. Hukam Chand and Ms. Yamini Kuthiala, Advocates, Mandi as Oath Commissioners at Mandi for a period of two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA -171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 30th May, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-304/09-Part.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 10 days earned leave w.e.f. 31-05-2017 to 09-06-2017 with permission to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10-06-2017 and 11-06-2017 in favour of Sh. Surya Parkash, Senior Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P.

Certified that Sh. Surya Parkash is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Surya Parkash would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil Judge-cum-ACJM, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 1st June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-374/2016.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 07 days earned leave w.e.f. 02-06-2017 to 08-06-2017 in favour of Ms. Deepika Thakran, Civil Judge-cum-JM-III, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Deepika Thakran is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

2013 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

Also certified that Ms. Deepika Thakran would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge-cum-JM-III, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla the 1st June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/14-341/2014.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 10 days' earned leave w.e.f. 28-6-2017 to 7-7-2017 with permission to prefix Sunday, Gazetted and local holidays falling on 25-6-2017 to 27-6-2017 in favour of Smt. Pratibha Negi, Civil Judge-cum- JMIC-I, Solan, H.P.

Certified that Smt. Pratibha Negi is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where she proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Smt. Pratibha Negi would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge cum-JMIC-1,Solan, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_____________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 31st May, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-263/2003.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex post facto sanction of 2 days earned leave for 21-05-2017 and 22-05-2017 in favour of Shri Sachin Raghu, Senior Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Solan, HP.

Certified that Shri Sachin Raghu had joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri Sachin Raghu would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil Judge-cum-CJM, Solan but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

2014 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA– 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 1st June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-225/96-I.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 11 days earned leave w.e.f. 27-06-2017 to 07-07-2017 with permission to prefix Sunday and Gazetted holiday falling on 25-06-2017 and 26-06-2017 and suffix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 08-07-2017 and 09-07-2017 in favour of Shri Yogesh Jaswal, District & Sessions Judge, Chamba, HP.

Certified that Shri Yogesh Jaswal is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri Yogesh Jaswal would have continued to hold the post of District & Sessions Judge, Chamba but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

________

ब अदालत श्री लक्ष्मण सिंह, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

चरणों पुत्र होशियार, निवासी चडी, डाकघर मैहला, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम चरणों है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल चडी में चरण सिंह दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी चरणों के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।2015 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 आज दिनांक 28-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

लक्ष्मण सिंह, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग,

उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0।

--------

देवी सिंह उर्फ देवो पुत्र मचलू, निवासी कलेरा, परगना प्यूहरा, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम देवो है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल लड्‌डा में देवी सिंह दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी देवी सिंह उर्फ देवो के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 27-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

लक्ष्मण सिंह, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0।

----------

अमर चन्द रावन गांव गुआड़ी, परगना लिहल, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

बनाम2016 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 आम जनता विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम अमर चन्द है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल मल्ला में अमरू दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी अमर चन्द के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 27-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

----------

ब अदालत श्री लक्ष्मण सिंह, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय वर्ग उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

जोगिन्दर सिंह पुत्र भक्तो, निवासी गांव व परगना बकाण, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम जोगिन्दर सिंह है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल राम्भो में घेन्दर दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी जोगिन्दर सिंह के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।2017 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 आज दिनांक 27-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।

---------

सुरजीत कुमार पुत्र भेखु, निवासी सादूण, परगना बसू, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम सुरजीत कुमार है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल सादूण में प्रीतम दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी सुरजीत कुमार के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 27-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

----------

रतन चन्द पुत्र चमारू, निवासी टिम्बू, परगना बसू, उप-तहसील धरवाला, जिला चम्बा, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

2018 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र बराये नाम दरुस्ती बारे।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थी ने अधोहस्ताक्षरी की अदालत में प्रार्थना पत्र मय हल्फी ब्यान व अन्य कागजात इस आशय से गुजारा है कि उसका सही नाम रतन चन्द है जो सही दर्ज है लेकिन राजस्व विभाग के मुहाल मझाटा में रतनू दर्ज है। जिसकी दरुस्ती की जावे।

इस सम्बन्ध में सर्वसाधारण जनता को बजरिया इश्तहार सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी रतन चन्द के नाम की दरुस्ती बारे यदि किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन अधोहस्ताक्षरी दिनांक 14-06-2017 को आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एक तरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जा करके नाम दरुस्ती के आदेश दे दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 27-04-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

----------

In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, I.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional

Magistrate, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Amit Kumar aged 22 years s/o Shri Phoolpati, r/o Tikka Pachpeda Barbata, Khiri Borbatta (U.P.) c/o Vasudev s/o Shri Roshan Lal r/o Tikka Chokkar, P.O. Aghar, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.).

and

Sarswati aged 21 years d/o Shri Babu Ram, r/o Tikka Pachpeda barbata, Khiri Borbatta (U.P.) c/o Vasudev s/o Shri Roshan Lal r/o Tikka Chokkar, P.O. Aghar, Tehsil & District Hamirpur . . Applicants. (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

2019 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Subject.— Notice under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Amit Kumar and Sarswati have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavit and other supported documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they solemnized marriage on 01-02-2017.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 21-06-17. The objection received after 21-06-17 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 20-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Sd/- Seal. Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

_________

ब अदालत जनाब सहायक समाहर्ता एवं कार्याकारी दण्डाधिकारी प्रथम श्रेेणी, ज्वाली, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0

श्रीमती अंजना देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री वीरेन्दर सिंह, निवासी महाल नगरोटा सूरियां, मौजा नगरोटा सूरियां, तहसील ज्वाली, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

बनाम

आम जनता

प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवम्‌ मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

श्रीमती अंजना देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री वीरेन्दर सिंह, निवासी गांव व डाकघर नगरोटा सूरियां, तहसील ज्वाली, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र गुजारा है कि श्री वीरेन्दर सिंह पुत्र रण सिंह की मृत्यु 16-7-1999 को गांव नगरोटा सूरियां में हुई थी जो गलती से पंचायत रिकार्ड में पंजीकृत नही करवा सकी। अब मृत्यु तिथि पंचायत रिकार्ड में दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।

अतः इस नोटिस के माध्यम से सर्वसाधारण को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त पंजीकरण के बारे में कोई उजर व एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 22-6-2017 को सुबह 10 बजे इस न्यायालय में असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा हाजिर न आने की सूरत में यकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर मृत्यु तिथि पंचायत रिकार्ड में पंजीकृत करने के आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे। इसके उपरान्त कोई एतराज न सुना जायेगा। 2020 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 7 जून, 2017/17 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 आज दिनांक 24-5-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी प्रथम श्रेणी, ज्वाली। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है