Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 55, 17 June 2017

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शनिवार, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 5th June, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5 (vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment & 55-राजपत्र/2017-17-06-2017 (2181) 2182 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Sandeep Kumar and Ms. Shilpa Kumari, Advocates, Shimla as Oath Commissioners at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla for a period of two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 5th June, 2017

No. HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.— Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment & Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate, Shimla as Oath Commissioner at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla for a period of two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 5th June, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.16 (13)74-VIII.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice, in exercise of the powers vested in him U/S 139(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, U/S 297(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Rule 5(vi) of the H.P. Oath Commissioners (Appointment & Control) Rules, 2007 has been pleased to appoint Sh. Varun Kant, Sh. Kirti Singh Thakur and Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocates, Shimla as Oath Commissioners at District Courts at Chakkar, Shimla for a period of two years with immediate effect for administering oaths and affirmations on affidavits to the deponents under the aforesaid Codes and Rules.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

2183 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 3rd June, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.3(384)/93-I.—20 days earned leave on and with effect from 05.06.2017 to 24.06.2017, with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and suffix Sunday and Gazetted Holiday falling on 25.06.2017 and 26.06.2017, is hereby sanctioned, in favour of Shri J.K. Sharma, Assistant Registrar of this Registry.

Certified that Shri J.K. Sharma is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri J.K. Sharma would have continued to officiate the same post of Assistant Registrar but for his proceeding on leave.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 5th June, 2017

No.HHC/Estt.3(510)/2000-I.—7 days earned leave on and with effect from 3.6.2017 to 9.6.2017 with permission to suffix second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10th & 11th June, 2017 is hereby sanctioned in favour of Shri Tarun Mahajan, Secretary of this Registry.

Certified that Shri Tarun Mahajan is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave after the expiry of the above leave period.

Certified that Shri Tarun Mahajan would have continued to officiate the same post of Secretary but for his proceeding on leave.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 5.4.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, 2184 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 26.03.2014;

And whereas Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 197/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hans Raj S/O Shri Trilok Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 05.04.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2185 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O Village Kuffa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 9.5.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 197/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Bhagwan Chand S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O Village Kuffa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 09.05.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2186 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21.01.2013;

And whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Gian Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 6 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2187 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.01.2013;

And whereas Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Pan Dei W/O Shri Sham Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after about 7 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of about 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2188 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated-nilreceived in Labour Office, Chamba on 31.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of after about 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.01.2013;

And whereas Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hari Singh S/O Shri Mahesh Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Kothi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2005 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after about 6 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 31.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of about 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2189 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal, R/O Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 26.12.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 9.10.2014;

And whereas Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Ram Kumar S/O Shri Shiv Lal, R/O Village Chaloli, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2000 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages for 29 days during year, 1990, 9 days during year, 1993 and 30 days during year, 2000 respectively and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 11 years vide demand notice dated 26.12.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 29 days during year, 1990, 9 days during year, 1993 and 30 days during year, 2000 respectively and delay of more than 11 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2190 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram, R/O Village Bisthow, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated19.12.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 14 and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 12.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Prem Raj S/O Shri Budhi Ram, R/O Village Bisthow, P.O. Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during July, 1997 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 14 years vide demand notice dated 19.12.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2191 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal, R/O Village and Post Office Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.12.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./ H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.01.2013;

And whereas Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4846/2015. The Hon'ble Division Bench, High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 31.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated above, alongwith all pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Janno Devi W/O Shri Chain Lal, R/O Village and Post Office Luj, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H. /H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 23.12.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2192 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-2/86(Lab) ID/2015-Bilaspur.—Whereas Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram, R/O Village Rathoha, P.O. Chunahan, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 12.9.2014 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 18 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 7.12.2015;

And whereas Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 189/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 25.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Hem Singh S/O Shri Jindu Ram, R/O Village Rathoha, P.O. Chunahan, Tehsil Balh, District Mandi, H.P. during November, 1992 by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., who had worked on daily wages only for 187 days in year, 1992 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 21 years vide demand notice dated 12.09.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 187 days in year, 1992 and delay of more than 21 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages,2193 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 10.12.2013;

And whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4396/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 21.11.2015 and directed the respondent to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and

set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the

receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs."

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the2194 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during June, 2003 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during June, 2003 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 10.12.2013;

"4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and

set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the

receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs."

2195 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 23.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during June, 2003 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Jagdish Kumar S/O Shri Ram Lal, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during June, 2003 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand, R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.4.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 29.3.2012;

And whereas Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4310/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 16.11.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case 2196 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand, R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 30.4.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during year, 2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Kamal Raj S/O Shri Khem Chand, R/O Village Chapanu, P.O. Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2000 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 27th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

2197 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

And whereas Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4507/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during May, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Khem Raj S/O Shri Gulab Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during May, 2004 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek Chand, R/O Village Badwahan, P.O. Urla, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 27.12.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive 2198 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 3.12.2013;

And whereas Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 116/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Khem Singh S/O Shri Tek Chand, R/O Village Badwahan, P.O. Urla, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25.03.1999 by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 78 days during year, 1998-99 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years vide demand notice dated 27.12.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 78 days during year, 1998-99 and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

2199 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 6.1.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 1.10.2015;

And whereas Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 130/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by the Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014- titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Kishan Dei W/O Shri Uggar Chand, R/O Village Findpar, P.O. Mindhal, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 06.01.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back2200 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 11th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 05.05.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.02.2013;

And whereas Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 2920/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 02.07.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

2201 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 5.5.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during September, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Kishnu S/O Shri Faqueeru R/O Village Baida, P.O. Tarella, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar, R/O Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 2.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4397/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 21.11.2015 and directed the respondent to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"4 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PB dated 10.12.2013 is quashed and

set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make reference to the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the

receipt of reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs."

2202 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar, R/O Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.6.2012 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service during September, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Smt. Krishni W/O Shri Vijay Kumar, R/O Village and Post Office Punto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand, R/O Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 06.10.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 128/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

2203

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Lal Dei W/O Shri Jagdish Chand, R/O Village Karel, P.O. Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 06.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 13.3.2014 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of after more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.3.2015;

2204 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3284/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 30.7.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 13.3.2014 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during December, 2001 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Manohar Lal S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village Jhajar Kukain, P.O. Bradta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. during December, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th February, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar Singh, R/O Village Dhakrera, P.O. Jalpehar, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 01.10.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Bassi Power House, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The2205 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 4.9.2013;

And whereas Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 166/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Ishwar Singh, R/O Village Dhakrera, P.O. Jalpehar, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 26.12.1996 by the Resident Engineer, H.P.S.E.B. Bassi Power House, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 14 years vide demand notice dated 01.10.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 14 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above exworker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

2206 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th February, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2015-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Jalgran, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 11.06.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by (1) The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (2) The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered and examined and Labour Commissioner as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 5 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 04.03.2013; And whereas Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4523/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed of the C.W.P. on 3.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to refer the dispute of the above workman to the Ld. Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal within four weeks. The operative part of the said judgment is reproduced as follows;

"5 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure PF dated 4.3.2013 is quashed and

set aside. The Labour Commissioner is directed to make a reference to the Labour Court-

cum-Industrial Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today and Labour Court-cum-

Industrial Tribunal shall decide the same within a period of six months after the receipt of

reference. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Meda Ram S/O Shri Chokash Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Jalgran, Tehsil Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P. employed as daily wage worker in the Indo German Changer Project, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., managed by the H.P. Eco Development Society, on the completion of project w.e.f. 31.03.2006 by the (1) The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Palampur, District2207 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Kangra, H.P. without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2. Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)

Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P and Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 19-05-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized their marriage on 15-02-2017 at their residence Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib and they have living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 15-02-2017 between Shri Yogesh Kumar s/o Shri Telu Ram, r/o Village Amboya, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Pritika d/o Shri Ram Lal, r/o Village Sataun, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 19-05-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

2208 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2. Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)

Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub- Tehsil Kamrau, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 27-05-2017 stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 04-12-2016 at their residence Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai and they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 04-12-2016 between Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Shankoli, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Priyanka Sharma d/o Shri Ramesh Chand, r/o Village Guddi Manpur, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 27-05-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

2209 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Surjit Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave Indira Gandhi Colony, Dehradun Uttarakhand.

2. Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o House No. 169 SAS Colony, Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)

Shri Surjit Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave Indira Gandhi Colony Dehradun Uttarakhand and Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o House No. 169 SAS Colony, Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 26-05-2017 stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 24-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 24-05-2017 between Shri Surjit Singh s/o Shri Nirmal Singh, r/o Kashmiri Colony, Guru Nanak Enclave Indira Gandhi Colony Dehradun Uttarakhand and Smt. Virender Kaur Rathour d/o Shri Tirlok Singh, r/o House No. 169 SAS Colony, Ward No. 7, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 26-05-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

_________

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan, r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP2210 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 2. Smt. Kashish Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda Khamchand PS and Tehsil Dhampur, District Bijnor, UP

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001)

Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan, r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Kashish Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda Khamchand PS and Tehsil Dhampur, District Bijnor, UP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 29-05-2017 stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 27-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have been living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 27-05-2017 between Shri Sandeep s/o Shri Darshan, r/o Village Amboya, PO Rajpur, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, HP and Smt. Kashish Kumari d/o Shri Rakesh Kumar, r/o House No. 587 Baseda Khamchand PS and Tehsil Dhampur, District Bijnor, UP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 29-05-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

__________

ब अदालत श्री हिरा सिंह सिमर, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील नौहराधार, जिला सिरमौर (हि0 प्र0)

श्रीमती सीमा पत्नी श्री विवेक, निवासी नौहराधार, तहसील नौहराधार, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

. . प्रार्थीन

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादीगण उपरोक्त प्रार्थना-पत्र श्रीमती सीमा पत्नी श्री विवेक, निवासी नौहराधार, तहसील नौहराधार, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 ने अधीन धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत करके प्रार्थना की है कि उनकी पुत्री कृतिका जिसकी जन्म तिथि 25-10-2010 है, का नाम ग्राम पंचायत नौहराधार के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं करवाया गया है। जिसे प्रार्थिन अब दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।2211 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अब सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उजर या एतराज हो तो वह स्वयं अथवा अपने प्रतिनिधि द्वारा मिति 23-06-2017 को सुबह दस बजे अदालत में उपस्थित आकर एतराज प्रस्तुत करें, बसूरत दीगर कुमारी कृतिका का नाम एवं जन्म तिथि को दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 24-05-2017 को हमारेेे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील नौहराधार, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

----------

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Kshitij s/o Shri Krishan Kumar, resident of Village Zadhyal, Post Office Dhari (Shoghi), Tehsil and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh have changed my name from Kshitij to Kshitij Kumar Verma. Please note.

KSHITIJ KUMAR VERMA

s/o Shri Krishan Kumar,

resident of Village Zadhyal, Post Office Dhari (Shoghi),

Tehsil and District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

_________

राज्य निर्वाचन आयोग हिमाचल प्रदेश STATE ELECTION COMMISSION HIMACHAL PRADESH आमर्जडेल शिमला -171002 Armsdale,Shimla-171002 Tel. 0177-2620152,2620159,2620154, Fax. 2620152

[email protected]

अधिसूचना

Dated, the 17th June, 2017

No.SEC(13)-96/2017-III-1197-1202.—यतः राज्य निर्वाचन आयोग हिमाचल प्रदेश द्वारा भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 243ZA, हिमाचल प्रदेश नगर निगम अधिनियम, 1994 की धारा 9 के साथ पठित हिमाचल प्रदेश नगर निगम निर्वाचन नियम, 2012 के नियम 33 की अनुपालना मे नगर निगम शिमला के सामान्य निर्वाचन करवाने हेतु अधिसूचना संख्या SEC(13)-96/2017-III-880-922 दिनांक 29.05.2017 अनुसार निर्वाचन कार्यक्रम जारी किया गया था;

यतः अब नगर निगम शिमला के निर्वाचन करवा लिए गये है तथा उक्त नियमावली के नियम 80 (6) के अन्र्तगत रिर्टनिंग अधिकारी एवं उपायुक्त शिमला से समस्त 34 वार्डो की रिटर्न प्ररूप-44 पर आयोग में प्राप्त हो गयी है;

2212 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अतः राज्य निर्वाचन आयोग, हिमाचल प्रदेश नगर निगम अधिनियम 1994 की धारा 13 की अनुपालना मे नगर निगम शिमला के लिए निर्वाचित पार्षदो के नाम व पते निम्नानुसार अधिसूचित करता हैः-

क्रम सं	वार्ड की संख्या व नाम	आरक्षण	निर्वाचित पाषर्दो का नाम व पता
1	1-भराड़ी	महिला	श्रीमति तनुजा चौधरी, सेठी निवास कलस्टन शिमला।
2	2-रूलदू-भटटा	अनारक्षित	श्री संजीव ठाकुर, कृष्णा कोटेज रूलदूभटटा, शिमला।
3	3-कैथू	अनारक्षित	श्री सुनील धर, निवासी मदूसुदन बिल्डिंग लोअर कैथू शिमला।
4	4-अनाडेल	अनु0जाति महिला	श्रीमति कुसुम सदरेट, बलैन्सीया एस्टेट लोअर कैंथू अनाडेल शिमला।
5	5-समरहिल	महिला	श्रीमति शैली शर्मा, डी-2, रेडियेन्ट होम्ज समरहिल, शिमला।
6	6-टूटू	अनारक्षित	श्री विवेक शर्मा, शर्मा बिल्डिंग, टूटु चौक तह0 व जिला शिमला।
7	7-मजाठ	अनारक्षित	श्री दिवाकर देव शर्मा, देवी काटेज, नजदीक वैध बिल्डिंग न्यू टूटु तह0 व जीला शिमला।
8	8-बालूगंज	महिला	श्रीमति किरण बावा, बावा निवास, चक्कर तह0व जिला शिमला।
9	9-कच्चीघाटी	अनारक्षित	श्री संजय परमार, योघदा आश्रम बालूगंज शिमला।
10	10-टूटीकण्डी	अनारक्षित	श्री आनन्द कौशल,हीरा निवास, टुटीकंडी, शिमला-4
11	11-नाभा	अनु0जाति महिला	श्रीमति सिम्मी नन्दा, अमित लॉज,फगली शिमला-4।
12	12-फागली	अनुसूचित जाति	श्री जगजीत सिंह बग्गा, सैंट एलवंस काटेज शिमला-1
13	13-कृष्णानगर	अनुसूचित जाति	श्री बिटटु कुमार, मकान न0 12 बिलो सिंह सभा गडडी खाना, कृष्णा नगर शिमला-1
14	14-राम बाजार ग ज ं	अनारक्षित	श्रीमति सुषमा कुठियाला, 78, बुटेल निवास, राम बाजार शिमला।
15	15-लोअर बाजार	अनारक्षित	श्री इंद्रजीत सिंह, तशीना काटेज, खलीनी, शिमला।
16	16-जाखू	महिला	श्रीमति अर्चना धवन, 30, चार्ली मांउट जाखू शिमला।
17	17-बैनमोर	महिला	श्रीमति किमी सूद, चीफ फायर ऑफिस बिल्डिंग, फोरेस्ट रोड नियर हेनाल्ट स्कूल स्टोक्स पैलेस छोटा शिमला।
18	18-ईंजनघर	महिला	कु0 आरती चौहान, सूर्यवंशी चौहान निवास, संजौली शिमला-6
19	19-संजौली चौक	अनारक्षित	श्रीमति सत्या कौंडल, मयूर निवास नोर्थ ओक संजौली शिमला-6
20	20-अप्पर-ढली	महिला	श्रीमति कमलेश मैहता, मैहता निवास ईन्द्र नगर ढ़ली शिमला-12।
21	21-लोअर ढली	अनारक्षित	श्री शैलेन्द्र चौहान, भिकटा निवास, नजदीक दुर्गा मन्दिर ढ़ली शिमला-12।
22	22-शान्ति विहार	महिला	श्रीमति शारदा चौहान, अखिल निवास, समीट्री रोड, संजौली-6।
23	23-भटटाकुफर	महिला	श्रीमति रीता ठाकुर, दरोगा निवास गाहन कमलानगर, शिमला।
24	24-सांगटी	महिला	श्रीमति मीरा शर्मा, शारदा सांगटी संजौली, शिमला-6।
25	25-मल्याणा	अनारक्षित	श्री कुलदीप ठाकुर, शहनान डाकघर, संजौली शिमला-6।
26	26-पंथाघाटी	अनारक्षित	श्री राकेश कुमार शर्मा, रामकृष्ण भवन, पंथाघाटी ।
27	27-कसुम्पटी	अनारक्षित	श्री राकेश चौहान, धार हाऊस जीवणू कलौनी कसुम्पटी।
28	28-छोटा शिमला	महिला	श्रीमति विदुषि शर्मा, सैट न0 5 सराज मैशन छोटा शिमला।
29	29-विकासनगर	अनु0जाति महिला	श्रीमति रचना, पलक भवन लाअर विकासनगर, शिमला।
30	30-कंगनाधार	महिला	श्रीमति रेनू चौहान,ज्योति निवास कागनाधार
31	31-पटयोग	महिला	श्रीमति आशा शर्मा, यशोदा भवन बी0सी0एस0 न्यू शिमला।
32	32-न्यु-शिमला	अनारक्षित	श्रीमति कुसुमलता ठाकुर अश्वनी बिल्डिंग सैक्टर-2, न्यू शिमला
33	33-खलीनी	अनुसूचित जाति	श्री पुरन मल, नव निकेतन भवन, लोअर खलीनी, शिमला।
34	34-कनलोग	महिला	श्रीमति बृज सूद, न्यू नारंग नियर के0एन0एच0 शिमला।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- राज्य निर्वाचन आयोग, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

--------

[email protected]

NOTIFICATION

Dated, the 17th June, 2017

No.SEC(13)-96/2017-III-1197-1202.—Whereas the State Election Commission has issued election programme under Article 243ZA of Constitution of India, Section 9 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 read with Rule 33 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Election Rules, 2012 vide Notification No. SEC(13)-96/2017-III-880-922 dated 29.05.2017 for the conduct of elections to Municipal Corporation Shimla.

2214 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas, now the election has been conducted and the Return of Election on Form-44 of the all 34 wards has been received from the Returning Officer-cum -Deputy Commissioner Shimla as required under Rule 80 (6) of the ibid Rules;

Therefore, the State Election Commission, in exercise of the powers vested in it under Section 13 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, hereby publishes the names and addresses of the newly elected Councillors of the Municipal Corporation Shimla as under:—

S r. No.	No. & Name of Wards	Reservation Status	Name & address of the elected Councillors
1	1- Bharari	Woman	Smt. Tanuja Chaudhary, Sethi Niwas, Keleston Shimla.
2	2-Ruldu-Bhatta	Unreserved	Sh. Sanjeev Thakur, Krishna Cottage, Ruldubhatta, Shimla.
3	3-Kaithu	Unreserved	Sh. Sunil Dhar, Madhusudan Building Lower Kaithu, Shimla.
4	4-Annandale	Woman S.C.	Smt. Kusum Sadret, Balencya Estate, Lower Kaithu Annadale Shimla.
5	5-Summer Hill	Woman	Smt. Shelli Sharma, D-2, Rediyent Homes, Summer hill Shimla.
6	6-Totu	Unreserved	Sh. Vivek Sharma, Sharma Building Totu Chowk, Tehsil & Distt. Shimla.
7	7-Majiath	Unreserved	Sh. Divakar Dev Sharma, Devi Cottage Near Vaid Building New Totu, Teh. & Distt. Shimla.
8	8-Boileauganj	Woman	Smt. Kiran Bava, Bava Niwas Chakkar, Teh.& Distt. Shimla.
9	9-Kachhighati	Unreserved	Sh. Sanjay Parmar, Yogdha Ashram Baluganj Shimla.
10	10-Tutikandi -Badai	Unreserved	Sh. Anand Kaushal, Hira Niwas, Tutikandi, Shimla4.
11	11-Nabha	Woman S.C.	Smt. Simi Nanda, Amt Lodge, Shimla-4.
12	12-Phagli	Schedule Caste	Sh. Jagjeet Singh Baga, Sent Alvance Cottage Shimla-1.
13	13-Krishna Nagar	Schedule Caste	Sh. Bittu Kumar H.No. 12 Below Singh Sabha Gaddi Khana Krishna Nagar, Shimla-1.
14	14-Ram Bazar Ganj	Unreserved	Smt. Sushma Kuthiala, 78 Butail Niwas Ram Bazar, Shimla.
15	15-Lower Bazar	Unreserved	Sh. Inderjeet Singh, Tashina Cottage, Khalini, Shimla.
16	16-Jhakhu	Woman	Smt. Archana Dhawan, 30, Charli Mount, Jakhoo, Shimla.
17	17-Benmore	Woman	Smt. Kimi Sood, Chief Fire Office Building, Forest Road Near Henault School Stocks Palace Chhota Shimla-2.
18	18-Engine Ghar	Woman	Kumari Arti Chauhan, Suryanshi Chauhan Niwas, Sanjauli, Shimloa-6.
19	19-Sanjouli Chowk	Unreserved	Smt. Satya Kondal, Mayur Niwas North Oak, Sanjauli, Shimla.
20	20-Upper Dhalli	Woman	Smt. Kemlesh Mehta, Mehta Niwas, Inder Nagar, Dhalli Shimla-12.
21	21-Lower Dhalli	Unreserved	Sh. Shellender Chauhan, Bhikta Niwas, Near Durga Mandir, Dhalli, Shimla-12.
22	22-Shanti Vihar	Woman	Smt. Sharda Chauhan, Akhil Niwas, Simitri Road, Sanjauli, Shimla-6.
23	23-Bhattakufar	Woman	Smt. Rita Thakur, Daroga Niwas Gahan, Kamla Nagar, Shimla.
24	24-Sangati	Woman	Smt. Meera Sharma, Sharda Sadan, Sangti Sanjauli, Shimla-6.
25	25-Malyana	Unreserved	Sh. Kuldeep Thakur, Shahnan P.O.Sanjauli, Shimla-6.
26	26-Pantha Ghatti	Unreserved	Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Ramkrishan Bhavan, Panthaghatti.
27	27-Kasumpti	Unreserved	Sh. Rakesh Chauhan, Dhar House, Jiuni Colony Kusumpati, Shimla.
28	28-Chhota Shimla	Woman	Smt. Vidushi Sharma, Set No. 5, Saraj Meshan Chhota Shimla.
29	29-Vikasnagar	Woman S.C.	Smt. Rachna, Palak Bhavan Lower Vikasnagar, Shimla.
30	30-Kangna Dhar	Woman	Smt. Renu Chauhan, Jayoti Niwas, Kangnadhar.
31	31-Pateog	Woman	Smt. Asha Sharma, Yashoda Bhavan, BCS New Shimla.
32	32-New Shimla	Unreserved	Smt. Kusumlata Thakur, Ashwani Building Sector- 2, New Shimla.
33	33-Khalini	Schedule Caste	Sh. Puran Mal, Nav Niketan Bhavan, Lower Khalini, Shimla.
34	34-Kanlog	Woman	Smt. Brij Sood, New Narang Near KNH, Shimla

2216 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 17 जून, 2017/27 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

By order, Sd/- State Election Commission, Himachal Pradesh.

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है