Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 56, 19 June 2017

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित सोमवार, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT

A-Section

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171002, the 12th June, 2017

No.Ind-A(A)1-1/2017.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order to establish a new Mining Office at Nurpur, Distt. Kangra, with immediate effect with the areas of Nurpur, Fatehpur and Jawali Sub-Divisions under its jurisdiction.

56-राजपत्र/2017-19-06-2017 (2217) 2218 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is also pleased to create following posts for the above Mining Office at Nurpur:—

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Inds.).

_____________

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-02, the 14th June, 2017

No. EDN-A-Ka(1)-32/2007-Loose.—The following Government Degree College(s) have been newly opened with effect from 2017-18 i.e. from the session June, 2017 :—

(a) Government Degree College Telka, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).

(b) Government Degree College Bhallai, Distt. Chamba (H.P.).

(c) Government Degree College Matour, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).

(d) Government Degree College Dehra, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).

(e) Government Degree College Haroli, Distt. Una (H.P.).

(f) Government Degree College Jainagar, Distt. Solan (H.P.).

(g) Government Degree College Darlaghat, Distt. Solan (H.P.).

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the creation of following teaching and non-teaching posts for the above mentioned each newly opened Government Degree College:—

The expenditure will be incurred under Major Head 2202-03-103-01-Soon-Non- Plan for smooth functioning of these colleges.

This issues with prior concurrence of the Fin. Department obtained vide their U.O No 53988501-Fin-E/2017, dated 04th June, 2017 and in the Cabinet meeting held on 05th June, 2017.

By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary(Education).

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 28.5.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, 2220 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 15.2.2014;

And whereas Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not

sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and

set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance

with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of

production of certified copy of the judgment.

With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending

application(s), if any.'

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 28.5.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August, 1999 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Jag Dev S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 1999 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 20th January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 7.10.2015; And whereas Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4686/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.12.2015 and directed the respondent to take appropriate action in accordance with law positively within a period of four weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In view of the settled position of law, the impugned orders are thus legally not

sustainable. Consequently, impugned orders Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 are quashed and

set aside with the direction to respondent No.-2 to take appropriate action in accordance

with law. Needful be positively done within a period of four weeks from the date of

production of certified copy of the judgment.

With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending

application(s), if any.'

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.1.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Ajeet Kumar S/O Shri Babu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2004 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,2222 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum-2223 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Devi Chand S/O Shri Munshi Ram, R/O Village Salga, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer- cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

2224 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1996 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?" 2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Dumnu S/O Shri Lachho, R/O Village and Post Office Kohladi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

_________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date2225 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer- cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Kamal Lal S/O Shri Karam Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is2226 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunalcum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1. "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1995 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Mohinder Kumar S/O Shri Hachhu Ram, R/O Village Dugli, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer- cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

2228 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?" 2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Hans Raj, R/O Village and Post Office Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination/regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Kishan Chand, R/O Village Udaipur, P.O. Saru, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"2231 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Subhash S/O Shri Hem Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer- cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial 2232 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1997 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Suresh Kumar S/O Shri Gajlo Ram, R/O Village Bhanota, P.O. Chaned, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has2233 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1998 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ghunghar Ram, R/O Village Dhar, P.O. Khundel, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 02.01.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Senior Executive 2234 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 13 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 3.12.2013;

And whereas Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 164/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Megh Singh S/O Shri Gawanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Gwali, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 25.03.1999 by the Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, H.P.S.E.B. Limited, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 138 days during years, 1996-99 and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 13 years vide demand notice dated 02.01.2013, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 138 days during years, 1998-99 and delay of more than 13 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 05.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2013;

And whereas Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 158/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 23.2.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by the High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014-titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Mehar Chand S/O Shri Mahajan Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 5.10.2010, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;

And whereas Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 18.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during April, 1994 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Nand Lal S/O Shri Gurdittu Ram, R/O Village Khanud, P.O. Khoral, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during April, 1994 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2012;

And whereas Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during February, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Sita Ram S/O Shri Dalela Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during February, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial2238 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.02.2013;

And whereas Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during July, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Rattan Lal S/O Shri Garja Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Dhawala, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during July, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications."

2240 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during September, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Tek Chand S/O Shri Lekh Ram, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during September, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 17.8.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 68 of 2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash impugned order, dated

20.03.2012 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

4 The writ petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending

applications."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 17.08.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August, 1998 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Jai Chand, R/O Village Sanihal, P.O. Khural, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 1998 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 02.06.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 9.10.2014;

2242 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 129/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Narinder Kumar S/O Shri Nanak Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Ponto, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 02.06.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th March, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2015-Kangra.—Whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.07.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 23 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4864/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 6.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in a batch of writ petitions, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Nathu Ram S/O Shri Gurdyal Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Sulyali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during April, 1988 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages only for 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988 and has raised his industrial dispute after about 23 years vide demand notice dated 23.07.2011, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period of 197 ½ days and 76 days in year, 1987 & 1988 respectively and delay of about 23 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand 2244 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 notice dated 22.1.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of after about 12 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 18.3.2015;

And whereas Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3282/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 30.7.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 22.1.2013 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during year, 2001 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Om Chand S/O Shri Chhadia, R/O Village Dharehada, P.O. Pehad, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D., Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 8th March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.03.2012;

And whereas Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4633/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 17.12.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioner, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 30.11.2009 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service w.e.f. 01.01.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Parkash Chand S/O Shri Hari Singh, R/O Village Chah, P.O. Mandap, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 01.01.2000 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,2246 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O Village Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated –nil received in Labour Office, Chamba on 29.5.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 6.10.2015;

And whereas Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Parwati W/O Shri Ramesh, R/O Village Chalali, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 29.5.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O Village Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 25.3.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 8.10.2015;

And whereas Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

2248 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Yog Raj S/O Shri Prem Lal, R/O Village Shour, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2005 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 6 years vide demand notice dated 25.3.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O Village Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 24.9.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officercum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 8 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 5.2.2014;

And whereas Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sheela W/O Shri Prem Raj, R/O Village Kufa, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after 8 years vide demand notice dated 24.9.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of 8 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 17th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O Village Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated –nil-received in Labour Office, Chamba on 15.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 30.4.2014;

2250 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 31/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sato Devi W/O Shri Dhano, R/O Village Kuthah, P.O. Dharwas, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2002 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 9 years vide demand notice dated –nil-received on 15.06.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of delay of more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex- worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th Februay, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2015-Joginder Nagar.—Whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 16.08.2011 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Inspector- cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 25.8.2012;

And whereas Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3504/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 24.08.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. vide demand notice dated 16.8.2011 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service w.e.f. 08.07.2005 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Smt. Parwati Devi W/O Shri Purshotam, R/O Village Banjal (Langehar), P.O. Baroti, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 08.07.2005 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

___________

In the Court of Shri Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-S.D.M., Hamirpur,

Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Vijay Kumar aged 30 years s/o Shri Nain Singh, r/o Village Mahal, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

and 2252 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Kiran aged 18 years d/o Shri Desh Raj, r/o Village Chammb, P.O. Kakkar, Tehsil Taunidevi, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Vijay Kumar and Kiran have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they intend to solemnized marriage within three Calendar months.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 01-07-2017. The objection received after 01-07-2017 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

[

In the Court of Arindam Chaudhary, IAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Subhash Chand aged 34 years s/o Shri Kishori Lal, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani, Tehsil & District Hamirpur.

and

Kanta Devi aged 22 years d/o Shri Dasu Ram, r/o Village & P.O. Majhog Sultani, Tehsil & District Hamirpur

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice under section 15-16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Subhash Chand and Kanta Devi have filed an application under Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavit and other documents in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they solemnized marriage 20-03-2017.

Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection for this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 04-07-2017. The objection received after 04-07-2017 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 01-06-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar,

District Mandi, H. P.

In the matter of :—

1. Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Village Khataula, P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District Muzaffarnagar, U.P. presently residing at Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O. Kanaid, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.

2. Pooja d/o Shri Jasbira, r/o V.P.O. Harsoli, Tehsil and District Muzaffarnagar, U.P. presently wife of Shri Parvindra s/o Sh. Desh Raj, r/o Sai Industry, Village Bhour, P.O. . . Applicants. Kanaid, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.

Versus

General Public

.. Respondent.

Subject.—Application for registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act 1954.

Notice :

Shri Parvindra and Pooja applicants have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage on 27-05-2017 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and they are living together as husband and wife since then, hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 07-07-2017 after that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Issued today on 29-05-2017 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

RAJIV KUMAR (HPAS), Marriage Office-cum-SDM, Sundernagar, District Mandi (H.P.).

In The Court of Shri Hemis Negi, H.A.S., Sub Divisional Magistrate Shimla (Urban),

District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12, Panchkula

. . Applicant.

Versus

General Public

.. Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Whereas Shri O. P. Oberoi s/o Late Shri Sita Ram Oberoi, r/o House No. 128, Sector 12, Panchkula has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration the date of birth of his daughter namely Upsana Oberoi (DOB 15-5-1970) in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Therefore, this proclamation, the General Public is hereby informed that any person having and objection for entry as to date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in this court on or before 6-7-2017 failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date and will be decided accordingly.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 6th day of June, 2017.

Seal.

HEMIS NEGI, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban).

__________

In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Shri Tsering Dorjee s/o Shri Damdul, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the date of birth of his Nephew named—Shri Tenzin Passang s/o Lt. Shri Kunsang Choephel, r/o House No. E-106, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

GIAN SAGAR NEGI, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R), District Shimla.

__________

In the Court of Shri Gian Sagar Negi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application along with affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the date of birth of his Daughter named—Ms. Tenzin Dolma d/o Shri Palden s/o Lt. Shri Sonam, r/o House No. 4, Tibetan Colony, Panthaghatti, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim regarding enter the name & date of birth of above named in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today 12-06-2017 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

GIAN SAGAR NEGI, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R), District Shimla.

ब अदालत श्री नरोतम लाल, सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 : 04/2017

तारीख पेशी : 01-07-2017 श्री राजेश कुमार पुत्र श्री मलकू पुत्र नाजरू, निवासी रजाना, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता/सगे सम्बन्धी

विषय.--दख्वास्त बराये सेहतनामा।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थना पत्र श्री राजेश कुमार पुत्र श्री मलकू पुत्र नाजरू, निवासी रजाना, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 ने इस आशय के साथ गुजारा है कि उसका नाम राजेश कुमार है जो कि शिक्षा विभाग, परिवार रजिस्टर में सही दर्ज है परन्तु राजस्व रिकार्ड मौजा रजाना में उसका नाम राजेन्द्र सिंह दर्ज है जो कि गलत दर्ज है तथा जिसकी वह कागजात माल में दरुस्ती करवाना चाहता है।

अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में यदि किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह स्वयं अथवा अपने प्रतिनिधि द्वारा मिति 01-07-2017 को सुबह 10 बजे हमारी अदालत में उपस्थित होकर उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई उजर काबले गौर न होगा तथा अदालत से नाम दरुस्ती बारे आवश्यक आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 30-05-2017 को हमारेे हस्ताक्षर एवं मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

-------

ब अदालत श्री नरोतम लाल, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 : 11/2017

तारीख पेशी : 01-07-2017 श्री वेद प्रकाश पुत्र श्री सनिया राम, निवासी रणफुआ, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण दर्ज करने बारे प्रार्थना-पत्र।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थना-पत्र श्री वेद प्रकाश पुत्र श्री सनिया राम, निवासी रणफुआ, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 ने अधीन धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत करके प्रार्थना की है कि उसके पुत्र अंकुश जिसकी जन्म तिथि 26-10-2011 है जो ग्राम पंचायत रणफुआ के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं करवाया गया है। जिसे प्रार्थी अब दर्ज करवाना चाहता है।2257 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में यदि किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह स्वयं अथवा अपने प्रतिनिधि द्वारा मिति 01-07-2017 को सुबह 10 बजे हमारी अदालत में उपस्थित होकर उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई उजर काबिले गौर न होगा तथा सायल के पुत्र अंकुश की जन्म तिथि दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे। आज दिनांक 30-05-2017 को हमारेे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

-------

ब अदालत श्री नरोतम लाल, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 : 10/2017

तारीख पेशी : 01-07-2017 श्रीमती दुरमा देवी पत्नी श्री सुभाष चन्द, निवासी अवांठा, डा0 सांगना, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण दर्ज करने बारे प्रार्थना-पत्र।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थना-पत्र श्रीमती दुरमा देवी पत्नी श्री सुभाष चन्द, निवासी अवांठा, डा0 सांगना, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 ने अधीन धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत करके प्रार्थना की है कि उसकी पुत्री श्रृष्टि जिसकी जन्म तिथि 31-10-2013 है जो ग्राम पंचायत सांगना के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं है। जिसे प्रार्थिया अब दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।

अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में यदि किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह स्वयं अथवा अपने प्रतिनिधि द्वारा मिति 01-07-2017 को सुबह 10 बजे हमारी अदालत में उपस्थित होकर उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई उजर काबिले गौर न होगा तथा सायल की पुत्री श्रृष्टि की जन्म तिथि दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे। आज दिनांक 30-05-2017 को हमारेे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।2258 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 : 05/2017 तारीख मरजुआ : 22-5-2017 तारीख पेशी : 01-07-2017 श्री परमानन्द पुत्र श्री जीत सिंह पुत्र कंठी राम, निवासी रजाना, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, . . प्रार्थीगण। हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता/सगे सम्बन्धी

. . प्रतिवादीगण। विषय.-दख्वास्त बराये सेहत नाम राजस्व रिकार्ड मौजा ढाल पलारा, तहसील रैणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0प्र0 प्रार्थी उपरोक्त ने अदालत हजा में एक दरख्वास्त गुजारी कि उसका नाम परमानन्द है जो कि शिक्षा विभाग, पंचायत रिकार्ड एवं आधार कार्ड में सही दर्ज है परन्तु राजस्व रिकार्ड मौजा ढाल पलारा में उसका नाम प्रेम सिंह दर्ज है जो कि गलत दर्ज है तथा जिसकी वह राजस्व रिकार्ड में दरुस्ती करवाना चाहता है। अतः इस अदालती इश्तहार के माध्यम से आम जनता/सगे सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि अगर प्रार्थी उपरोक्त का नाम राजस्व रिकार्ड मौजा ढाल पलारा, पटवार वृत काकोग में दर्ज करने बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर एवं एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 01-07-2017 को प्रातः 10 बजे हमारी अदालत में असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर आकर उजर एवं एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई कार्यवाही काबिले समायत न होगी तथा नियमानुसार आवश्यक आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 30-05-2017 को हमारेे हस्ताक्षर एवं मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

-------

ब अदालत श्री नरोतम लाल, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

मिसल नं0 : 08/2017

तारीख पेशी : 01-07-2017 श्री विनोद कुमार पुत्र हीरा सिंह, निवासी टिकरी, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण दर्ज करने बारे प्रार्थना-पत्र।

उपरोक्त प्रार्थना-पत्र श्री विनोद कुमार पुत्र हीरा सिंह, निवासी टिकरी, तहसील रेणुकाजी, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 ने अधीन धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत करके प्रार्थना की है कि उसके दादा हुक्मी राम पुत्र शंकर जिसकी मृत्यु तिथि 01-01-2013 है का नाम ग्राम पंचायत संगडाह के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं है। जिसे प्रार्थी अब दर्ज करवाना चाहता है।2259 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि इस सम्बन्ध में किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह स्वयं अथवा अपने प्रतिनिधि द्वारा मिति 01-07-2017 को सुबह 10 बजे हमारी अदालत में उपस्थित होकर उजर/एतराज प्रस्तुत कर सकता है बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई उजर काबिले गौर न होगा तथा सायल के दादा हुक्मी की मृत्यु तिथि दर्ज करने के आदेश जारी कर दिये जायेंगे। आज दिनांक 30-05-2017 को हमारेे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, रेणुकाजी स्थित संगडाह, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

---------

ब अदालत श्री माया राम शर्मा, उप-पंजीपाल शिलाई, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0

गुमान सिंह पुत्र श्री नैन सिंह, निवासी ग्राम बोबरी, तहसील शिलाई कुन्दन सिंह पुत्र श्री नैन सिंह, निवासी ग्राम बोबरी, तहसील शिलाई

बनाम

आम आदमी।

3. श्रीमती छटो देवी पत्नी श्री नैन सिंह, निवासी ग्राम बोबरी, तहसील शिलाई। 4. श्रीमती किरण बाला पुत्री श्री नैन सिंह, निवासी ग्राम बोबरी, तहसील शिलाई।

प्रार्थना-पत्र किये जाने बारे पंजीकृत वसीयतनामा (unregistered) जेर धारा 40-41 के अन्तर्गत।

इस इश्तहार के द्वारा आपको अवगत कराया जाता है कि गुमान सिंह पुत्र श्री नैन सिंह, निवासी ग्राम बोबरी, तहसील शिलाई, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0 द्वारा एक वसीयतनामा इस न्यायालय में प्रस्तुत कर निवेदन किया है कि उनके पिता श्री नैन सिंह द्वारा अपने जीवन काल में एक वसीयत खाम तहरीर की है अब नैन सिंह पुत्र ख्यालू राम की मृत्यु हो चुकी है अब वसीयत को गुमान सिंह व कुन्दन सिंह पुत्र नैन सिंह रजिस्ट्रेशन एक्ट की धारा 40-41 के अन्तर्गत पंजीकृत किया जाए। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम व खास को सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी को कोई आपत्ति हो तो वह दिनांक 04-07-2017 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर अदालत होकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। हाजिर न आने की स्थिति में कार्यवाही एकतरफा अमल में लाई जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 27-05-2017 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- उप-पंजीपाल,

शिलाई, जिला सिरमौर, हि0 प्र0।

---------

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

District Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub- Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 01-06-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized their marriage on 07-05-2017 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 7-5-2017 between Shri Tarun Kumar s/o Shri Ram Swaroop, r/o Village Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Neelam Kumari d/o Shri Tula Ram, r/o Village Korga, Sub-Tehsil Kamrau, District Sirmaur, H.P. he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

__________

In the Court of Shri H. S. Rana, H.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate

Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

NOTICE UNDER SECTION 16 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT, 1954

In the matter of :

1. Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

2. Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP.

Versus

General Public

Application for the registration of Marriage under Section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954

(Central Act) as amended by Marriage Laws (Amendment Act 01, 49 of 2001).

Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP have filed an application alongwith affidavits in this court under section 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 on dated 31-05-2017 stating therein that they have been solemnized their marriage on 12-12-2016 at their residence Paonta Sahib and they have living together as husband and wife ever since then. Hence notices are given to all concerend and general public to this effect that if any body have any objection regarding the registration of marriage duly solemnized on 12-12-2016 between Shri Rohit s/o Shri Vidya Dutt Bhardwaj, r/o ward No. 11, House No. 94/1 badri Nagar, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. and Smt. Ekta d/o Shri Umesh Sharma, r/o Village Seithba, District Kanpur, UP he should file written objections and appear personally or through an authorized agent before this court within 30 days from the date of issue of this notice. After expiry of the said period, the marriage certificate would be issued to the applicants by this court.

Issued under my hand and office seal of this court on 01-06-2017.

Seal.

HARI SINGH RANA (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur.

__________

ब अदालत श्री डी0 आर0 भाटिया, तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, नालागढ़, जिला सोलन, हि0 प्र0

मु0 नं0 : 8/2017

श्रीमती निर्मला देवी

बनाम

आम जनता

प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धरा 13(3) हि0 प्र0 पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

श्रीमती निर्मला देवी पुत्री श्री प्रीतम सिंह, निवासी पल्ली (गुरदासपुरा) तहसील नालागढ़, जिला सोलन ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसकी माता प्यारी देवी की मृत्यु दिनांक 8-1-1972 को हुई है परन्तु ग्राम पंचायत बगलैहड में मृत्यु पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें । 2262 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 19 जून, 2017/29 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अतः इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त प्यारी देवी की मृत्यु तिथि पंजीकरण किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह अपना एतराज हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 15-7-2017 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर पेश कर सकता है। अन्यथा मृताबिक शपथ-पत्र मृत्यु तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 15-6-2017 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी,

नालागढ़, जिला सोलन (हि0 प्र0)। नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है