Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 57, 20 June 2017

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित मंगलवार, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

CHARGE RELINQUISHMENT REPORT

Dated 12th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/14-217/95-1.—I, Rakesh Chaudhary, herebyrelinquish the charge of the post of Registrar (Administraion), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, today the 3rd day of June, 2017, in the evening to avail 05 days' earned leave w.e.f. 05.06.2017 to 09.06.2017 with 57-राजपत्र/2017-20-06-2017 (2263) 2264 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.6.2017.

By order, (RAKESH CHAUDHARY) Registrar (Administration).

________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA - 171 001

CHARGE ASSUMPTION REPORT

Dated 12th June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-217/95-1.—I, Rakesh Chaudhary, assume the charge of the post of Registrar (Administraion), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, today the 12th day of June, 2017, in the forenoon after availing 05 days' earned leave w.e.f 05.06.2017 to 09.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 04.06.2017 and to suffix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.6.2017.

By order, (RAKESH CHAUDHARY) Registrar (Administration).

________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA – 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 13th June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-237/1999.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex post facto sanction of 03 days commuted leave w.e.f 22.05.2017 to 24.05.2017 in favour of Sh. Rajeev Bali, Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Kangra at Dharamshala, HP.

Certified that Sh. Rajeev Bali had joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Rajeev Bali would have continued to hold the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Kangra at Dharamshala, HP but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 13th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/ 14-347/2014.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant expost facto sanction of 05 days commuted leave w.e.f 02.05.2017 to 06.05.2017 with permission to suffix Sunday fell on 07.05.2017 in favour of Ms. Akanksha Dogra, Civil Judge-cum-JMIC-1, Dharamshala, H.P.

Certified that Ms. Akanksha Dogra has joined the same post and at the same station from where she proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Ms. Akanksha Dogra would have continued to hold the post of civil Judge-cum-JMIC-1, Dharmshala, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 13th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/14-349/2014.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant ex post facto sanction of 01 day commuted leave for 06.05.2017 with permission to suffix Sunday fell on 07.05.2017 in favour of Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P.

Certified that Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj had joined the same post and at the same station from where he proceeded on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj would have continued to hold the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, HP but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 14th June, 2017

No. HHC/GAZ/14-233/97-1.— Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 10 days earned leave w.e.f 19.06.2017 to 28.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 in favour of Shri Pune Ram, Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, H.P.

2266 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Certified that Shri Pune Ram is likely to join the the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri Pune Ram would have continued to hold the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 9th June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-152/83-1.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 6 days earned leave w.e.f. 19.06.2017 to 24.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday, Gazetted and Local holidays falling w.e.f 25.06.2017 to 27.06.2017 in favour of Shri S.C. Kainthla, District & Sessions Judge, Solan, HP.

Certified that Shri S.C. Kainthla is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri S.C. Kainthla would have continued to hold the post of District & Sessions Judge, Solan but for his proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 9th June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-265/2003-1.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 6 days earned leave w.e.f. 12.06.2017 to 17.06.2017 with permission to prefix Second Saturday and Sunday falling on 10.06.2017 and 11.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 in favour of Dr. Abira Basu, Senior Civil Judge-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.

Certified that Dr. Abira Basu is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Dr. Abira Basu would have continued to hold the post of Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P., but for her proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 9th June, 2017

No.HHC/GAZ/14-329/2013.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice has been pleased to grant 6 days earned leave w.e.f. 19.06.2017 to 24.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 and to suffix Sunday and Gazetted holiday falling on 25.06.2017 and 26.06.2017 in favour of Shri Gaurav Kumar, Civil Judge cum-JMIC, Chopal, District Shimla, H.P.

Certified that Shri Gaurav Kumar is likely to join the same post and at the same station from where he proceeds on leave, after expiry of the above period of leave.

Also certified that Shri Gaurav Kumar would have continued to hold the post of Civil Judge-cum-JMIC, Chopal, District Shimla, H.P., but for hir proceeding on leave for the above period.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

_________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA - 171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 14th June, 2017

No.HHC/Admn.6 (23)/74-XVI.—Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice in exercise of the powers vested in him under Rule 2(32) of Chapter 1 of H.P. Financial Rules, 2009, has been pleased to declare the Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Mandi as Drawing and Disbursing Officer in respect of the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi and also the Controlling Officer for the purpose of T.A etc. in respect of class-II, III and IV establishment attached to the aforesaid court under head "2014-Administration of Justice" during the earned leave period of Sh. Pune Ram, Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, HP w.e.f 19.06.2017 to 28.06.2017 with permission to prefix Sunday falling on 18.06.2017 or till he returns from earned leave.

By order, Sd/- Registrar General.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 16th February, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 10.8.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 17.6.2013;

And whereas Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 3704/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 10.9.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order in the writ

petition and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petition is disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 10.8.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during October, 2004 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Prabh Dayal S/O Shri Surjan, R/O Village Bairagarh, P.O. Bairagarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2004 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,2269 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

CORRIGENDUM

Shimla-171001, March, 2016

No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2013/Mandi.—In partial modification of this Department's Notification of even number dated 17.01.2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri Pratap Chand S/O Shri Bhadru Ram, R/O Village Phakrohal, P.O. Seoh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. may be read as "08.07.2005" instead of "09.07.2005".

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 29th February, 2016

No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2015/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Pritam Singh S/O Shri Pohu Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jindwari, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, (Punjab) and the General Manager, M/s Indo Farm Equipment Ltd., EPIP Phase-II, Village Thana Baddi, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of transfer /termination from services during February /March, 2014.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

2270 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 "Whether the termination of the services of Shri Pritam Singh S/O Shri Pohu Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jindwari, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, (Punjab) by the General Manager, M/s Indo Farm Equipment Ltd., EPIP Phase-II, Village Thana Baddi, District Solan, H.P. during the months February/March, 2014 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 29th February, 2016

No.: 11-2/93(Lab) ID/2015/Baddi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Rajiv Kumar, resident of C/O Nirmal Singh Village Bangla Beli, P.O. Kharoni, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. (Present address) and Set No.-15, Qrs.No.-6/A, Post Chittranjan, District Burdwan (West Bengal)-713331 and the Managing Director, M/s Super Multicolor Prints Pvt. Limited, (Folding Carton), Village Kishanpura, Baddi, Nalagarh Road, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of termination from services w.e.f. 1.8.2014.

As per the report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Shimla, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication :—

"Whether the termination of the services of Shri Rajiv Kumar, resident of C/O Nirmal Singh Village Bangla Beli, P.O. Kharoni, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. (Present address) and Set No.-15, Qrs.No.-6/A, Post Chittranjan, District Burdwan (West Bengal)- 713331, who was employed as senior operator and drawing salary Rs. 40,000/-per month by the Managing Director, M/s Super Multicolor Prints Pvt. Limited, (Folding Carton), Village Kishanpura, Baddi, Nalagarh Road, District Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 1.8.2014 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

CORRIGENDUM

Shimla-171001, March, 2016

No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2013/Mandi.—In partial modification of this Department's Notification of even number dated 17.01.2015, the date of termination of services of workman Shri Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Ram Ditta, R/O Village Sandehra, P.O. Tihra, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. may be read as "08.07.2005" instead of "09.07.2005".

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 10.9.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 16 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 31.10.2013;

And whereas Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

2272 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 10.9.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during July, 1996 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dhanu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Golli, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during July, 1996 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram, R/O Village Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 22.3.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.11.2014;

And whereas Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram, R/O Village Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 22.3.2012 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during November, 2000 vide notice dated 21.10.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Tilak Raj S/O Shri Ronki Ram, R/O Village Kharnalla, P.O. Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during November, 2000 vide notice dated 21.10.2000, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 2.2.2013 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 15 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 13.11.2013;

2274 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 And whereas Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 2.2.2013 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during April, 1997 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Mohinder Singh S/O Shri Diwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Tritha, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during April, 1997 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh, R/O Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 15.10.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of about 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.2.2013;

And whereas Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh, R/O Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 15.10.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during November, 2000 vide notice dated 6.10.2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Kewal Krishan S/O late Shri Chatter Singh, R/O Village Jasoor, P.O. Samote, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during November, 2000 vide notice dated 6.10.2000, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 15.11.2011 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive 2276 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 11 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21.5.2015;

And whereas Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 15.11.2011 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August, 2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Kishan Pal S/O late Shri Sagar Singh, R/O Village and Post Office Jatroon, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2000 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st January, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 18.5.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 16.2.2013;

And whereas Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4250/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 26.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petition are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending application, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 18.5.2010 regarding his alleged illegal termination of service during August, 2000 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Shri Karmo alias Karam Chand S/O late Shri Hari Chand, R/O Village Dangari, P.O. Taragarh, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. during August, 2000 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not,2278 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, March, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2015-Mandi.—Whereas Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram, R/O Village Hukkal, P.O. Longani, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 19.2.2010 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum- Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.; And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of 6 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.3.2013;

And whereas Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 35/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 7.1.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014, CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Sanjay Kumar S/O Shri Achharu Ram, R/O Village Hukkal, P.O. Longani, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 09.02.2004 by the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after 6 years vide demand notice dated 19.02.2010, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of delay of 6 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

"CORRIGENDUM"

Shimla-171001, 12th February, 2016

No.11-23/84(Lab)I.D./2015-Mandi.—Whereas, an alleged industrial dispute exists in between Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Balam Ram, R/O Village Morla, P.O. Brang, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. versus The Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division, Dharampur, District Kangra, H.P. Whereas, a reference has been made to the Ld. Labour Court Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. vide Notification of even number dated 23.10.2015 for its legal adjudication in compliance of order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the Hon"ble Division Bench, High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 3932/2015-titled as Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of H.P. However, inadvertently the correct facts could not be mentioned in para-3 of the said Notification. Therefore, the same may be read as follows;

"And whereas Shri Sanjeev Kumar S/O Shri Balam Ram, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon"ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4158/2015. The Hon "ble Division Bench, High Court of H.P. has disposed of the civil writ petition on 15.10.2015 and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the judgment dated 30th December, 2014, delivered by this Court in a batch of writ petitions, CWP No. 9467 of 2014-titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others, being the lead case. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish Kumar, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 23.01.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner H.P..;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 9 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 14.11.2014;

And whereas Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish Kumar agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 63/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Sebo Kumari W/O Shri Jagdish Kumar, R/O Village Findru, P.O. Sach, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2002 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 9 years vide demand notice dated 23.01.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period during May, 1995 to October, 2002 and delay of more than 9 years2281 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 21st March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram, R/O Village Chhow, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 08.05.2012 regarding his illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer- cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 7.2.2014;

And whereas Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 63/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 22.02.2016 and directed the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment, dated 30th December, 2014 delivered by Hon'ble High Court of H.P. in CWP No. 9467 of 2014 case titled Pratap Chand versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others within eight weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to consider the

case of the petitioners, in terms of the judgment (supra), and make a decision within eight

weeks. The said judgment shall form part of this judgment also.

4. The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- 2282 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Thakur Singh S/O Shri Thanu Ram, R/O Village Chhow, P.O. Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during September, 2004 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 08.05.2012, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period during April, 1996 to September, 2004 and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4 March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 12.6.2012 regarding her illegal termination from the services by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.P.H. /H.P.P.W.D., Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 10 years and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 28.02.2014;

And whereas Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 113/2016. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 8.1.2016 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order, dated

28.2.2014 (Annexure P-1) and direct the Labour Commissioner to make reference to the

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

applications."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

"Whether the industrial dispute raised by the worker Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. before the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. vide demand notice dated 12.6.2012 regarding her alleged illegal termination of service during October, 2001 suffers from delay and latches? If not, Whether termination of the services of Smt. Sevi Devi W/O Shri Bhagwan Chand, R/O Village and Post Office Purthi, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. by the Executive Engineer, I.P.H./H.P.P.W.D. Division, Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during October, 2001 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above aggrieved workman is entitled to from the above employer?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 30.03.2014 regarding his time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer cum- Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and he should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 19.09.2015;

And whereas Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of his industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has 2284 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1998 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?" 2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 30.03.2014 after more than 7 years of Shri Yash Pal S/O Shri Duni Chand, R/O Village Millah, P.O. Singi, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 4th March, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2015-Chamba.—Whereas Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal, R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. had raised a demand notice dated 15.06.2014 regarding her time to time termination / regularization of services from back date by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. The Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. tried to settle the industrial dispute amicably, but the same could not be settled during the course of conciliation2285 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 proceedings, where after he sent a report under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Commissioner, H.P.;

And whereas the report sent by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. was considered, examined and Deputy Labour Commissioner, H.P. as appropriate Government came to the conclusion that above worker had raised the dispute at a belated stage of more than 7 years and applicant is a regular employee from October, 2013 and she should raise the dispute in the appropriate forum and therefore declined the reference of the dispute vide order dated 21.09.2015;

And whereas Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal, agitated the above orders of declining of reference of her industrial dispute to the Ld. Labour Court before the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh vide C.W.P. No. 4572/2015. The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh has disposed off the civil writ petition on 2.12.2015 and directed the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks. The operative part of the judgment is reproduced as follows;

"3 In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned orders in the writ

petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make reference to the Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ

petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, along with all pending applications, if

any."

Therefore, in view of above the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court-cum- Industrial Tribunal, Dharamsala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;

1 "Whether alleged time to time termination of services of Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal, R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. during the year 1996 to April, 2006 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., who had worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute after more than 7 years vide demand notice dated 15.06.2014, without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified ? If not, keeping in view of working period and delay of more than 7 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

2 "Whether the demand of regularization of daily wager services raised vide demand notice dated 15.06.2014 after more than 7 years of Smt. Darshna Devi D/O Shri Sohan Lal, R/O Village Mohalla Mugla, P.O. Hardaspura, Chamba Town, Tehsil and District Chamba, H.P. to be fulfilled by Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. from the date his junior workmen have been regularized, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what arrear of wages and consequential relief of service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner Himachal Pradesh.

सामान्य प्रशासन विभाग

अनुभाग-ख

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 2 जुलाई, 2016

संख्याः जीएडी-बी-(ए)1-10/2013-1(ऊना).--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल की यह राय है कि ऐसा करना आवश्यक है कि निम्नलिखित स्तम्भ संख्या 6 में दर्शाए गए पटवार वृत्तों से गठित, जिला ऊना में एक नई उप-तहसील बिहरू कलां सृजित की जाए, ताकि नजदीक के गांवों के सम्बद्ध लोगों को बेहतर सेवाएं उपलब्ध करवाई जा सकें और जिससे उनको होने वाली असुविधा से निवारित किया जा सके तथा बेहतर प्रशासनिक नियन्त्रण हो सके।

अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 (1954 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 6) की धारा 6 और रजिस्ट्रीकरण अधिनियम, 1908 (1908 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 16) की धारा 5 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, जिला ऊना, हिमाचल प्रदेश में तुरन्त प्रभाव से एक नई उप-तहसील बिहरू कलां, जिसका मुख्यालय मन्दली में होगा, का सृजन करते हैंः--

जिला मुख्यालय

उप-तहसील का नाम

उप-मण्डल का नाम

तहसील का नाम

सम्मिलित पटवार वृत्त

तहसील का नाम जिससे अपवर्जित किए गए 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 बिहरू कलां बंगाणा बंगाणा ऊना मन्दली 1. थानाकलां बंगाणा 2. छपरोह कलां

3. बुढवार

4. टीहरा

5. मन्दली

6. मकरैड

7. रायपुर

8. बोहरू

आदेश द्वारा, वी0 सी0 फारका, मुख्य सचिव।2287 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939

[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GAD-B- (A)-1

10/2013 (Una) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of

India.]

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

Section-B.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016

No. GAD-B-(A)-1-10/2013-1(Una).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is of the opinion that it is necessary to do so that a new Sub-Tehsil Bihru Kalan in District Una may be created consisting of the Patwar Circles shown in column 6, below to provide better services to the concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them and to have the better administrative control.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No.6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No. 16 of 1908), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to create a new Sub-Tehsil at Bihru Kalan with its headquarter at Mandli in District Una, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect:—

District

Name of

Tehsil

Head-

quarter

Patwar Circles

Included

Name of

Sub-

Division

Name of

the

Sub-

Tehsil

Name of

Tehsil from

where

excluded

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bangana Bangana Una Mandli 1. Thana Kalan Bangana Bihru Kalan

2. Chhaproh

Kalan

3. Budwar

4. Tihra

5. Mandli

6. Makred

7. Raipur

8. Bohru

By order, V. C. PHARKA, Chief Secretary.

सामान्य प्रशासन विभाग

अनुभाग-ख

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 2 जुलाई, 2016

संख्याः जीएडी-बी-(ए) 1-2/2013-1 (शिमला).--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल की यह राय है कि ऐसा करना आवश्यक है कि निम्नलिखित स्तम्भ संख्या 6 में दर्शाए गए पटवार वृत्तों से गठित, जिला शिमला में एक नई उप-तहसील जलोग सृजित की जाए, ताकि नजदीक के गांवों के सम्बद्ध लोगों को बेहतर सेवाएं उपलब्ध करवाई जा सकें और जिससे उनको होने वाली असुविधा से निवारित किया जा सके तथा बेहतर प्रशासनिक नियन्त्रण हो सके।

अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 (1954 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 6) की धारा 6 और रजिस्ट्रीकरण अधिनियम, 1908 (1908 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 16) की धारा 5 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, जिला शिमला हिमाचल प्रदेश में तुरन्त प्रभाव से एक नई उप-तहसील जलोग का सृजन करते हैंः-

जिला मुख्यालय

उप-तहसील का नाम

तहसील का नाम

सम्मिलित पटवार वृत्त

उप-मण्डल का नाम

तहसील का नाम जिससे अपवर्जित किए गए 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

सुन्नी शिमला जलोग 1. धरोगड़ा

सुन्नी जलोग शिमला ग्रामीण

2. सैन्ज 3. बनूना 4. ओगली 5. करयाली

आदेश द्वारा, वी0 सी0 फारका, मुख्य सचिव।

---------

[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GADB-( A)-1

2/2013-1 (Shimla) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of

India.]

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

Section-B.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016

No. GAD-B-(A)-1-2/2013-1(Shimla).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is of the opinion that it is necessary to do so that a new Sub-Tehsil Jalog in District Shimla may be2289 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 created consisting of the Patwar Circles shown in column 6, below to provide better services to the concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them and to have the better administrative control.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No.6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No. 16 of 1908), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to create a new Sub-Tehsil at Jalog in District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect:—

District

Name of

Tehsil

Head-

quarter

Patwar Circles

Included

Name of

the Sub-

Tehsil

Name of

Sub-

Division

Name of

Tehsil from

where

excluded

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jalog Shimla Sunni Shimla Jalog 1. Dharogra

Sunni Rural

2. Sainj

3. Banuna

4. Ogli

5. Karyali

By order, V. C. PHARKA, Chief Secretary.

___________

सामान्य प्रशासन विभाग

ख-अनुभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 2 जुलाई, 2016

संख्याः जीएडी-बी-(ए) 1-15/2013-1 (चम्बा).--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल की यह राय है कि वर्तमान उप-तहसील सिहुन्ता, जिला चम्बा, हिमाचल प्रदेश का दर्जा बढ़ाकर तहसील का कर दिया जाए, जिसका मुख्यालय सिहुन्ता, जिला चम्बा, हिमाचल प्रदेश में होगा, ताकि नजदीक के गांवों के सम्बद्ध लोगों को बेहतर सेवाएं उपलब्ध करवाई जा सकें और राजस्व से सम्बन्धित कार्य में उनको होने वाली असुविधा से निवारित किया जा सके तथा बेहतर प्रशासनिक नियन्त्रण हो सके।

अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 (1954 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 6) की धारा 6 और रजिस्ट्रीकरण अधिनियम, 1908 (1908 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 16) की धारा 5 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, जिला चम्बा, हिमाचल प्रदेश में तुरन्त प्रभाव से निम्नलिखित पटवार वृाों से समाविष्ट उप-तहसील सिहुन्ता का दर्जा बढ़ाकर तहसील का करते हैं :-

तहसील उप-मण्डल जिला मुख्यालय सम्मिलित पटवार वृत्त सिहुन्ता भटियात चम्बा सिहुन्ता 1. वालू

2. सिहुन्ता

3. मोतला

4. धुलारा

5. नलोह

6. गोला

7. हटली

8. फलाहड

9. कथेट

10. मनहूता

11. टिकरी

12. समोट

13. टुन्डी

14. मोरठू

15. डुप्पर

आदेश द्वारा, वी0 सी0 फारका, मुख्य सचिव।

---------

[Authoritative English text of the Himachal Pradesh Government Notification NO. GADB-(A)-1

15/2013-1 (Chamba) Dated 2-7-2016 as required under clause(3) of Article 348 of the Constitution

of India.]

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

B-Section.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 2nd July, 2016

No. GAD-B-(A)-1-15/2013-1 (Chamba).—Whereas, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is of the opinion that present Sub-Tehsil Sihunta District Chamba H.P. may be upgraded to that of Tehsil with its Headquarter at Sihunta, District Chamba H.P., to provide better services to the concerned people of nearby villages and to avoid inconvenience faced by them pertaining to revenue work and to have better administrative control.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 (Act No. 6 of 1954) and section 5 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Act No. 16 of 1908) the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to upgrade the Sub-Tehsil Sihunta in District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh to that of Tehsil consisting of Patwar Circles given below with immediate effect:—

Tehsil Sub-Division District Headquarter Patwar Circles Included

Sihunta Bhatiat Chamba Sihunta 1. Balu

2. Sihunta

3. Motla

4. Dhulara

5. Naloh

6. Gola

7. Hatli

8. Falahat

9. Kathed

10. Manhuta

11. Tikri

12. Samot

13. Tundi

14. Morthu

15. Dupper

By order, V. C. PHARKA, Chief Secretary.

__________

गृह विभाग (सी अनुभाग)

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2 14 जून, 2017

संख्याः गृह-सी (एफ)10-3/2015.--राज्य सरकार यह समीचीन समझती है कि कतिपय स्थानों में अप्राधिकृत व्यक्तियों के प्रवेश को रोकने के लिए पूर्वावधानियॉं बरती जानी चाहिए;

और भारत सरकार के गृह मंत्रालय ने एस0 ओ0 568 (ई) तारीख 24-09-1974 द्वारा, शासकीय गुप्त बात अधिनियम, 1923 की धारा 2 की उपधारा (8) के खण्ड (ग) और (घ) में विनिर्दिष्ट मामले के सम्बन्ध में, केन्द्रीय सरकार के कृत्यों को हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार को सौंपा है; और

अतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, शासकीय गुप्त बात अधिनियम, 1923 की धारा 2 की उपधारा (8) के खण्ड (घ) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, एतद्‌द्वारा, उक्त अधिनियम के प्रयोजनों हेतु, नीचे दी गई अनुसूची के स्तम्भ (1) में विनिर्दिष्ट स्थान (स्थानों) को, इस अधिसूचना के राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशन की तारीख से, प्रतिषिद्ध स्थान घोषित करते हैं।2292 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 20 जून, 2017/30 ज्येष्ठ, 1939 अनुसूची स्थान का नाम परिक्षेत्र और अन्य विवरण ----------------------------------------------- (1) (2)

400/220 के0 वी0 गांव बनाला, डाकघर व जी0 आई0 एस0 उप केन्द्र बनाला। तहसील औट, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

आदेश द्वारा, प्रबोध सक्सेना प्रधान सचिव (गृह)।

----------

[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Home-C (F) 10-3/2015,

dated____________as required under article 348(3) of the Constitution of India.]

Home Department (C-Section)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 14th June, 2017

No. Home-C(F)10-3/2015.—WHEREAS, the State Government considers it expedient that precautions should be taken to prevent the entry of unauthorized persons into certain places;

AND WHEREAS, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide S.O. 568 (E) dated 24-09-1974 has entrusted the functions of the Central Government to the Government of Himachal Pradesh in relation to matter specified in clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (8) of section 2 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (8) of section-2 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh hereby declares that place(s) specified in column (1) of the SCHEDULE given below to be a prohibited place(s) for the purposes of the said Act with effect from the date of publication of this Notification in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.

SCHEDULE

Name of Place Locality and other descriptions; (1) (2) 400/220 KV, Village Banala , PO & Tehsil Aut GIS Sub Station Banala. District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.

By order, PRABODH SAXENA, Principal Secretary (Home).

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है