Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 95, 05 August 2017

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शनिवार, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS ORGANIZATION

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 26th July, 2017

No. Per (AR) B(2)1/2017.—Whereas Government of Himachal Pradesh vide notification No. Per(AR)B(2)1/2017 dated 26th July, 2017 has issued the Terms and Conditions of Services of State Information Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh under Section 16(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Whereas Section 16(5)(b) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provide for the Salary and allowances payable and other terms and condition of Services of the State Information Commissioner being same as that of the Chief Secretary of the State as amended from time to time. 95-राजपत्र/2017-5-08-2017 (4819)4820 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 Whereas the pay and allowances of Chief Secretary to the Government of Himachal Pradesh has increased vide letter No. Karmik (Lekha-B(1)-126/84-III dated 6th April, 2017 of Department of Personnel (Accounts) from the existing Basic Pay of Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 2,25,000/- P.M.

The Governor of Himachal Pradesh is therefore pleased to substitute the existing figures of (Pay) in Sl. No. 2 of Terms & Condition of State Information Commissioner from Rs. 80,000/- to Rs. 2,25,000/- in the above mentioned notification dated 26th July, 2017.

By order, PURNIMA CHAUHAN Secretary (AR).

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dalhousie, District Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Kuldeep Kumar s/o Shri Man Singh, r/o Village Adhi, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated 31-07-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during 09-07-2002 before the above employer after delay of about 12 years and has worked only from 30-04-1998 to 08-07-2002.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

4821 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Kuldeep Kumar s/o Shri Man Singh, r/o Village Adhi, P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 09-07-2002 by the Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after about 12 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from 30-04-1998 to 08-07-2002 and delay of about 12 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management? "

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Kuldeep Singh s/o Shri Karnail Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during October, 1990.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Kuldeep Singh s/o Shri Karnail Singh, r/o Village Nera, P.O. Suliali, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during October, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 24-11-2013 after lapse of more than 23 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 234822 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-1/18(Lab) ID/2016/Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Bhagat Ram s/o Shri Dhiraj Ram, r/o V.P.O. Balag, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2007 to 26-12- 2014.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Ludar Mani s/o Shri Durgu Ram, r/o Village Gahi, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2007 to 26-12-2014 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4823 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 12th May, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2016/Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Madan Lal s/o Shri Joginder Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab and Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman).

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Madan Lal s/o Shri Joginder Singh, c/o Shri R.K. Singh Parmar, General Secretary, Pb. INTUC, L-211, Brari, P.O. Partap Nagar, Tehsil Nangal, District Ropar, Punjab w.e.f. 01-07-2014 (as alleged by workman) by the Managing Director, M/s Arvind Talwar Machine Tools (P) Limited, V.P.O. Nangal Khurad, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Manohar Lal s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o Village Meharka, P.O. Danni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during September, 1987.

4824 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Manohar Lal s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o Village Meharka, P.O. Danni, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during September, 1987 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Dharamshala on 26-10-2013 after lapse of more than 26 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 26 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Mirchu s/o Shri Badrideen, r/o Village Manor, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during June, 1990.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)4825 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Mirchu s/o Shri Badrideen, r/o Village Manor, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 27-07- 2012 after lapse of more than 12 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 12 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2014/Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Munshi Ram s/o Shri Biju, through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination from services as daily wages beldar during February, 1998 to April, 2005 and year, 2013.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Munshi Ram s/o Shri Biju, through Shri I.S. Jaryal, General Secretary, District Committee (AITUC), CHEP Stage-II, Karian P.O. Hardaspura, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. during January 1999 to 31-08- 2007 by the Executive Engineer, I.&P.H. Division, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If4826 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016

No. 11-5/99(Lab) ID/2016/Chamba.—Whereas the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba has submitted a report as provided under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Smt. Nain Dei d/o Shri Paras Ram, r/o Village Hudan, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. and the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I.&P.H./H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P. as per demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 23-06-2012 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding termination of her services.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub- section-5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex-worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during May, 2003 before the above employer after delay of more than 9 years and has worked only for 31, 15, 51, 59, 25 and 10 days during years 1990, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2003 respectively.

"Whether alleged termination of services of Smt. Nain Dei d/o Shri Paras Ram, r/o Village Hudan, P.O. Killar, Tehsil Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. during May, 2003 by the Executive Engineer, Killar Division, I. &P.H./H.P.P.W.D., Killar (Pangi), District Chamba, H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised her industrial dispute vide demand notice dated nil received in the Labour Office Chamba on 23-06-2012 after more than 9 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period of 31, 15, 51, 59, 25 and 104827 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 days during years 1990,1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2003 respectively and delay of more than 9 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?. "

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-1/7(Lab) ID/2016/Joginder Nagar.—Whereas the Labour Inspector-cum- Conciliation Officer, Joginder Nagar has submitted a report as provided under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 stating that there was an alleged industrial dispute in between Shri Nanak Chand s/o Shri Khiyali Ram, r/o Village Khroh, P.O. Sadhot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D. Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. as per demand notice dated 18-03-2014 submitted by the said ex-worker regarding his termination of services.

Whereas, the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, has incorporated in the report that during the course of conciliation proceedings for the purpose of bringing about a legal and amicable settlement, all matters affecting the settlement were investigated and has made all efforts for the purpose of inducing the parties to come to legal, fair and amicable settlement of the said dispute. However, no such settlement could be arrived at in between the parties to the industrial dispute.

Whereas, undersigned while exercising the power vested as provided under sub-section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid carefully examined the report and come to the conclusion that above ex- worker had raised the dispute of alleged illegal termination from the services during August, 2002 before the above employer after delay of more than 11 years and has worked only for May, 1997 to August, 2002.

Therefore, in view of the above facts and circumstances, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV- Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as provided in sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) and keeping in view the latest judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla about the declining the references to the Labour Court for adjudication, formed an opinion to refer this dispute to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, for legal adjudication on following issue:—

"Whether alleged termination of services of Shri Nanak Chand s/o Shri Khiyali Ram, r/o Village Khroh, P.O. Sadhot, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during August, 2002 by (i) the Executive Engineer, H.P.P.W.D. Division Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P., (ii) the4828 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D. Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P., who has worked as beldar on daily wages basis and has raised his industrial dispute after more than 11 years, allegedly without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, keeping in view of working period from May, 1997 to August, 2002 and delay of more than 11 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?. "

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 17th May, 2016

No. 11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Sadhu Ram, r/o Village Lakhwal, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during March, 1992.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Naresh Kumar s/o Shri Sadhu Ram, r/o Village Lakhwal, P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during March, 1992 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 03-04-2014 after lapse of more than 22 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 22 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority,4829 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 12th May, 2016

No. 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Biru Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2001 to 26-12-2014.

As per the report under section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Biru Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2001 to 26-12-2014 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

4830 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171001, the 9th May, 2016

No. 11-3/93(Lab)ID/2016/Kullu.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Lot Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. and (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination of his services during year, 2003 to June, 2013 and finally during July, 2013.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Om Chand s/o Shri Lot Ram, r/o Village Jhiri, P.O. Nagwain, Sub-Tehsil Aut, District Mandi, H.P. during year, 2003 to June, 2013 and finally during July, 2013 (as alleged by workman) by (i) the Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, District Solan, H.P., (ii) the Associate Director (R&E) Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Regional Horticulture Research Station Bajaura, District Kullu, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

By order, Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 18th May, 2016

No. 11-23/84(Lab) ID/2016/Mandi.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Parmanand s/o Shri Nainan Chand, r/o Village Banouni, P.O. Bhatehar,4831 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. and Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of alleged time to time termination from services as daily wages beldar during March, 1997 to year, 2012 and finally during year, 2012.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether time to time termination of the services of Shri Parmanand s/o Shri Nainan Chand, r/o Village Banouni, P.O. Bhatehar, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. during March, 1997 to year, 2012 and finally during year, 2012 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 30th May, 2016

No.11-1/85(Lab) ID/2016/Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Pradeep Kumar s/o Shri Soohdu Ram, r/o V.P.O. Sadwan (Manohra), Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services as daily wages beldar during June, 1990.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February 2014 and as per4832 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939 power vested under sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether alleged termination of the services of Shri Pradeep Kumar s/o Shri Soohdu Ram, r/o V.P.O. Sadwan (Manohra), Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during June, 1990 by (i) the Executive Engineer, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D. Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., (ii) the Executive Engineer, Jawali Division, H.P.P.W.D. Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified; whereas he has raised the industrial dispute vide demand notice dated 26-04-2013 after lapse of more than 12 years. If not, keeping in view delay of more than 12 years in raising the industrial dispute, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employers?."

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner,

Himachal Pradesh.

__________

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

FORM-6

(See rule-9)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF EXISTING LANDUSE MAP

Shimla, the 3rd August, 2017

No. HIM/TP/PJT/PA-Baijnath-Paprola/2013/Vol-I/3896-3923.—Whereas, objections and suggestions were invited vide Notice No. HIM/TP/PJT/PA- Baijnath-Paprola/2013/Vol- I/18249-66 dated 26-12-2016 with respect to the Existing Land Use Map for Baijnath-Paprola Planning Area under sub-section (1) of section 15 of the Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977 (Act No. 12 of 1977); and

Whereas, objections and suggestions were received and the modifications have been made in the said Existing Land Use Map, wherever, required.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers vested under sub-section (3) of section 15 of the Act ibid, Notice is given that the Existing Land Use Map for Baijnath-Paprola Planning Area is hereby adopted without modifications and a copy thereof is available for inspection during office hours in the following offices:—

1. The Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Nagar Yojana Bhawan, Block No. 32-A, Vikas Nagar, Kasumpati, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh-171009.

2. The Planning Officers, Town Planning Office, Palampur, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.

4833 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939

3. The Secretary, Nagar Panchayat Baijnath-Paprola, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.

The said Existing Land Use Map shall come into operation with effect from the date of publication of this Notice in the Official Gazette of Himachal Pradesh and it shall be conclusive evidence of the fact that the Map has been duly prepared and adopted.

Place: Shimla Date: 3-8-2017.

Sd/-

SANDEEP KUMAR, Director, Town and Country Planning Department.

4834 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 5 अगस्त, 2017/14 श्रावण, 1939

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है