राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित मंगलवार, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
उद्योेग विभाग
क-अनुभाग
अधिसूचना
शिमला-171002, 12 अक्तबूर, 2017
संख्या इन्ड-ए(ए) 3-2/2017.--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, भारत के संविधान के अनुच्छेद 309 के परन्तुक द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श से, हिमाचल प्रदेश उद्योग विभाग में तहसीलदार, वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित) के पद के लिए इस अधिसूचना से संलग्न उपाबन्ध ''क'' के अनुसार भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम बनाते हैं, अर्थात्ः-
176-राजपत्र/2017-28-11-2017 (8279) 8280 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.--(1) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश उद्योग विभाग, तहसीलदार, वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित), भर्ती और प्रोन्नति नियम, 2017 है।
(2) ये नियम राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशन की तारीख से प्रवृत्त होंगेे।
2. निरसन और व्यावृत्तियां.--(1) इस विभाग की अधिसूचना संख्या : 5-50/72-एस.आई. (ईस्ट) तारीख 01-11-1973 द्वारा अधिसूचित दी हिमाचल प्रदेश, इण्डस्ट्रीज़ डिपार्टमेंट, क्लास-I एण्ड II (डिवेल्पमेंट सैल) सर्विसीज़ (रिक्रूटमेंट, प्रमोशन एण्ड सर्टेन कंडिशंज़ ऑफ सर्विसीज़)़ रूल्ज,़ 1973 का उस विस्तार तक निरसन किया जाता है, जहां तक ये तहसीलदार, वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित) के पद से संबंधित है। (2) ऐसे निरसन के होते हुए भी उपरोक्त नियम 2(1) के अधीन इस प्रकार निरसित नियमों के अधीन की गई कोई नियुक्ति, बात या कार्रवाई इन नियमों के अधीन विधिमान्य रूप में की गई समझी जाएगी।
आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- अतिरिक्त मुख्य सचिव (उद्योग)।
--------
उपाबन्ध-'क' हिमाचल प्रदेेश, उद्योग विभाग में तहसीलदार, वर्ग-I, (राजपत्रित) के पद के लिए भर्ती और प्र्रोन्नति नियम
1. पद का नाम.--तहसीलदार
2. पद (पदों) की संख्या.--1 (एक)
3. वर्गीकरण.--वर्ग-I (राजपत्रित)
4. वेतनमान.-- ` 10300-348005000 ग्रेड पे
5. ''चयन'' पद अथवा ''अचयन'' पद.--लागू नहीं।
6. सीधी भर्ती के लिए आयु.-- लागू नहीं।
7. सीधे भर्ती किए जाने वाले व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) के लिए अपेक्षित न्यूनतम शैक्षिक और अन्य अर्हताएंः--(क) अनिवार्य अर्हताः--लागू नहीं।
(ख) वांछनीय अर्हताः--लागू नहीं।
8. सीधे भर्ती किए जाने वाले व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) के लिए विहित आयु और शैक्षिक अर्हताएं प्रोन्नत व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) की दशा में लागू होगी या नहींः--आयुः--लागू नहीं।
शैक्षिक अर्हताः--लागू नहीं।
9. परिवीक्षा की अवधि, यदि कोई होः-- लागू नहीं।8281 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 10. भर्ती की पद्धति ः भर्ती सीधी होगी या प्रोन्नति/सैकेण्डमैंट/स्थानान्तरण द्वारा और विभिन्न पद्धतियों द्वारा भरे जाने वाले पदों की प्रतिशतताः--राजस्व विभाग, हिमाचल प्रदेश से शतप्रतिशत सैकेण्डमैंट आधार पर।
11. प्रोन्नति/सैकेण्डमैंट/स्थानान्तरण द्वारा भर्ती की दशा में, वे श्रेणियां (गे्रड) जिनसे प्रोन्नति/सैकेण्डमैंट/स्थानान्तरण किया जाएगाः--तहसीलदारों में से सैकेण्डमैंट आधार पर, जिनका कम से कम दो वर्ष का नियमित सेवाकाल या ग्रेड में की गई लगाातार तदर्थ सेवा, यदि कोई हो, को सम्मिलित करके दो वर्ष का नियमित सेवाकाल हो।
12. यदि विभागीय प्रोन्नति समिति विद्यमान हो, तो उसकी संरचनाः--लागू नहीं।
13. भर्ती करने में, जिन परिस्थितियों में हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग से परामर्श किया जाएगाः--जैसा विधि द्वारा अपेक्षित हो।
14. सीधी भर्ती के लिए अनिवार्य अपेक्षा :--लागू नहीं।
15. सीधी भर्ती द्वारा पद पर नियुक्ति के लिए चयनः--लागू नहीं।
16. आरक्षणः--सेवा में नियुक्ति, हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा समय-समय पर अनुसूचित जातियों/ अनुसूचित जन जातियों/अन्य पिछडे़ वर्गों और व्यक्तियों के अन्य प्रवर्ग के लिए सेवाओं में आरक्षण की बावत जारी किए गए आदेशों के अधीन होगी ।
17. विभागीय परीक्षाः--सेवा में प्रत्येक सदस्य को समय-समय पर यथा संशोधित हिमाचल प्रदेश विभागीय परीक्षा नियम, 1997 में यथाविहित विभागीय परीक्षा उतीर्ण करनी होगी।
18. शिथिल करने की शक्तिः--जहां राज्य सरकार की यह राय हो कि ऐसा करना आवश्यक या समीचीन है, वहां वह कारणों को लिखित में अभिलिखित करके और हिमाचल प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग के परामर्श से, आदेश द्वारा, इन नियमों के किन्हीं उपबन्ध (उपबन्धों) को किसी वर्ग या व्यक्ति (व्यक्तियों) के प्रवर्ग या पद (पदों) की बाबत शिथिल कर सकेगी।
____________
[Authoritative English text of this Department Notification No. Ind.-A(A)3-2/2017 dated:
12-10-2017 as required under Article 348 (3) of the constitution of India].
INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT
A-Section
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171002, 12th October, 2017
No. Ind.-A(A)3-2/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, is pleased to make the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Tehsildar, Class-I (Gazetted) in the Department of Industries, H.P. as per Annexure- "A" attached to this Notification, namely :—
1. Short title and commencement:—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh, Department of Industries Tehsildar, Class-I (Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2017.
8282 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 (2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.
2. Repeal & savings:—(1)The Himachal Pradesh, Industries Department, Class-I and II (Development Cell) Services (Recruitment, Promotion and certain conditions of services) Rules, 1973, notified vide this Departments Notification No.5-50/72-SI(Estt.) dated 01-11-1973are hereby repealed to the extent these pertains to the post of Tehsildar, Class-II (Gazetted).
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal any appointment made or any thing done or any action taken under the rules so repealed under rule 2 (1) supra shall be deemed to have been validly made or done or taken under these rules.
By order, Sd/- Addl. Chief Secretary (Industries).
___________
ANNEXURE-"A"
RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF TEHSILDAR CLASS-I
(GAZETTED) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, HIMACHAL PRADESH
1. Name of the Post:—Tehsildar
2. Number of Post(s):—01 (One)
3. Classification:—Class-I (Gazetted)
4. Scale of Pay:—` 10300-34800 + ` 5000 Grade Pay
5. Whether "Selection" post or "Non-Selection" post:—Not Applicable.
6. Age for direct Recruitment:—Not Applicable.
7. Minimum Educational and other qualifications required for direct recruit(s):— (a) Essential Qualification: Not Applicable.
(b) Desirable Qualification:—Not Applicable.
8. Whether age and Educational qualification(s) prescribed for direct recruit(s) will
apply in the case of the promotee(s):—(i) Age :— Not applicable.
(ii) Educational Qualification:—Not applicable.
9. Period of probation, if any:—Not Applicable.
10. Method(s) of recruitment, whether by direct recruitment or by promotion/ secondment/transfer and the percentage of post(s) to be filled in by various methods:—100% on secondment basis from Revenue Department.
8283 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 193911. In case of recruitment by promotion/secondment/transfer, grade(s) from which promotion/secondment/transfer is to be made:—On secondment basis from amongst the Tehsildars having atleast two years regular or regular combined with continuous adhoc service, if any, in the grade.
12. If a Departmental Promotion Committee exists, what is its composition:—Not Applicable.
13. Circumstances under which the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission
(HPPSC) is to be consulted in making recruitment:—As required under the Law.
14. Essential requirement for a direct recruitment.—Not Applicable.
15. Selection for appointment to post by direct recruitment:—Not Applicable.
16. Reservation:—The appointment to the service shall be subject to orders regarding reservation in the service for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes /other categories of persons issued by the Himachal Pradesh Government from time to time.
17. Departmental Examination:—Every member of the service shall pass a Departmental Examination as prescribed in the Himachal Pradesh Departmental Examination Rules, 1997, as amended from time to time.
18. Powers to Relax:—Where the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient to do so, it may, by order for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission relax any of the provision(s) of these Rules with respect to any class or category of person(s) or post(s).
___________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No. 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2017-Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Hari Ram S/O Shri Tulsi Ram, R/O Village Sanour Tikkeri, P.O. Panoh, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (1) The Executive Engineer, I &P.H. Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. (2) M/S SMC SBM Universal (JV), Near Bhud Store, Kandrour, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. on the issue of termination from services during w.e.f. 13.12.2013.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) 8284 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;
"Whether demand raised vide demand notice dated-nil-received on 10.12.2015 by Shri Hari Ram S/O Shri Tulsi Ram, R/O Village Sanour Tikkeri, P.O. Panoh, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. regarding reinstatement in service after submission of resignation dated 13.12.2013 before (1) The Executive Engineer, I &P.H. Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. (2) M/s SMC SBM Universal (JV), Near Bhud Store, Kandrour, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 13.12.2013, is legal & justified? If yes, what relief of past service benefits, seniority, monetary and other consequential service benefits the above mentioned worker is entitled as per demand notice? If not, what its legal effects?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 16th March, 2017
No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017-Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Kamal Kishore S/O Shri Bajiru Ram, R/O Village Lanzera, P.O. Awan, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. and (1) The Managing Director, M/s Shakti Hydro Electric Company Pvt. Ltd., Regd. Office D-III, Defense Colony, New Delhi-110024. (2) The Occupier, M/s Shakti Hydro Electric Company Pvt. Ltd., R/O Village Kahri, P.O. Awan, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of termination of services during December, 2014.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the termination of the services of Shri Kamal Kishore S/O Shri Bajiru Ram, R/O Village Lanzera, P.O. Awan, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. by (1) The Managing Director, M/s Shakti Hydro Electric Company Pvt. Ltd., Regd. Office D-III, Defense Colony, New Delhi-110024. (2) The Occupier, M/s Shakti Hydro Electric Company Pvt. Ltd., R/O Village Kahri, P.O. Awan, Tehsil Bhatiyat, District Chamba, H.P. during December, 2014 without complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,8285 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 28th March, 2017
No. 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2017-Bilaspur.—Government of Himachal Pradesh Department of Labour & Employment Dated, Shimla-171001 28th March, 2017 Notification It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Krishnu Ram S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Nichli Bhater, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. and (1) The Executive Engineer, I &P.H. Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. (2) M/S SMC SBM Universal (JV), Near Bhud Store, Kandrour, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. on the issue of termination from services w.e.f. 29.06.2015.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication;
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Krishnu Ram S/O Shri Bardu Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Nichli Bhater, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. by (1) The Executive Engineer, I &P.H. Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. (2) M/S SMC SBM Universal (JV), Near Bhud Store, Kandrour, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 29.06.2015 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal & justified? If not, to what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above ex-worker is entitled to from the above employer / management." Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
8286 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 07th April, 2017
No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2017-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Kuldeep Singh S/O Shri Milkhi Ram, R/O Village Dadoa, Bari, Tehsil Jaswan, District Kangra, H.P. and The Divisional Forest Officer, Dehra Forest Division, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of termination from services during year, 2013.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: -
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Kuldeep Singh S/O Shri Milkhi Ram, R/O Village Dadoa, Bari, Tehsil Jaswan, District Kangra, H.P. from time to time during years, 1996 to 2013 and finally terminated during year, 2013 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Dehra Forest Division, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, past service benefits, seniority, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22th February, 2017
No. 11-1/18(Lab)ID/2017-Sunder Nagar.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Naveen Kumar S/O Shri Kheema Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Seri-Kothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. on the issue of termination from services w.e.f. 27.07.2009.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
8287 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the termination of services of Shri Naveen Kumar S/O Shri Kheema Ram, R/O Village and Post Office Seri-Kothi, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. by the Divisional Forest Officer, Suket Forest Division, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. w.e.f. 27.07.2009 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the worker, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd February, 2017
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Lt. Shri Roshan Lal, R/O Village Amjad, P.O. Dohgi, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. and The Principal S.D. Adarsh Sanskrit College, Dohgi, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. on the issue of termination of services during July, 2015.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication:—
"Whether the termination of the services of Smt. Nirmala Devi W/O Lt. Shri Roshan Lal, R/O Village Amjad, P.O. Dohgi, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. by the Principal, S.D. Adarsh Sanskrit College, Dohgi, Tehsil Bangana, District Una, H.P. during July, 2015 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
8288 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTNOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, 22nd February, 2017
No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017-Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Prem Prakash S/O Shri Jogi Ram, R/O Village Mohanpur, P.O. Kotha, District Chamba, H.P. and the Project Manager, M/s Batot Hydro Power Project Ltd., Working Office Upper Julakhari, C/O Shri Surender Shekhari, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of termination of services w.e.f. 17.01.2016.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the termination of the services of Shri Prem Prakash S/O Shri Jogi Ram, R/O Village Mohanpur, P.O. Kotha, District Chamba, H.P. by the Project Manager, M/s Batot Hydro Power Project Ltd., Working Office Upper Julakhari, C/O Shri Surender Shekhari, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 17.01.2016 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and amount of compensation the above aggrieved worker is entitled to from the above Employer / Management?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 20th March, 2017
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between the President/General Secretary, Country Liquor Bottling Plant, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, H.P. G.I.C. Limited, County Liquor Bottling Plant, Plot No.- 5 & 5A, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power8289 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the demands raised by the President/General Secretary, Country Liquor Bottling Plant, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P. vide demand notice 19.09.2014 (Copy enclosed) before the Managing Director, H.P. G.I.C. Limited, County Liquor Bottling Plant, Plot No.-5 & 5A, Industrial Area, Mehatpur, District Una, H.P., is tenable, legal and justified? If yes, what relief of service benefits the above workmen of the above employees Union entitled as per demand notice? If not, what its legal effects?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 18th March, 2017
No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2017-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between the President/Secretary, Springer Cozy Touch Polyfoam Workers Union, C/O Shri Gurnam Singh, Village Majra, P.O. Sanoli, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the General Manager, M/s Springer Mattresses / Cozy Touch Polyfoam Limited, Village Heer Thada (Laluwal), P.O. Bidharwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether the demands raised by the President/Secretary, Springer Cozy Touch Polyfoam Workers Union, C/O Shri Gurnam Singh, Village Majra, P.O. Sanoli, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. vide demand notice 19.08.2015 (Copy enclosed) before the General Manager, M/s Springer Mattresses / Cozy Touch Polyfoam Limited, Village Heer Thada (Laluwal), P.O. Bidharwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P., is tenable, legal and justified? If yes, what8290 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 relief of past service benefits the above workmen of the above employees Union entitled as per demand notice? If not, what its legal effects?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-171001, the 22nd February, 2017
No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2017-Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dinnu Ram, R/O Village Saroti, P.O. Bhajotra, Sub Tehsil Bhalei, District Chamba, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Churah Forest Division, Salooni, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of fifteen days fictional breaks in services during March, 2009 onwards.
As per the report under Section 12(4) of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Conciliation Officer, he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under Sub Section 5 of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.
Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers vested by the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh vide Notification No. Shram(A)4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under Sub Section-1 of Section 10 of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal Dharamshala, constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/issues for legal adjudication: —
"Whether giving the fifteen days breaks in service to Shri Ramesh Kumar S/O Shri Dinnu Ram, R/O Village Saroti, P.O. Bhajotra, Sub Tehsil Bhalei, District Chamba, H.P. workman during his service period from March, 2009 to onwards by the Divisional Forest Officer, Churah Forest Division, Salooni, District Chamba, H.P. without following/complying the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by the workman, is legal and justified? If not, what relief of past service benefits the above workman is entitled to for the above mentioned period from the concerned employer?"
By order, Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh.
____________
ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0
तारीख पेशी : 27-11-2017 केस नं0 : MT/2017
1. श्री चेत राम पुत्र श्री मनोहर लाल, गांव छिन्जरा, डा0 व्राधा, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 ।
. . प्रार्थीगण 2. श्रीमती तारादेवी पुत्री श्री गोविन्द राम, गांव छनीनाल, डा0 शलवाड़, उप-तहसील सैन्ज, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र08291 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 बनाम आम जनता
. . प्रत्यार्थी। विषय.-- प्रार्थना पत्र जेर धारा 5(4) हि0 प्र0 रजिस्ट्रीकरण नियम 2004 विवाह पंजीकरण बारे।
उपरोक्त मामला में प्रार्थीगण उपरोक्त ने दिनांक 25-10-2017 को इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पेश किये हैं कि उन्होंने दिनांक 25-10-2008 को शादी कर ली है और तब से दोनोें पति पत्नी के रूप में रहते चले आ रहे हैं। परन्तु प्रार्थीगण ने अपनी शादी का इन्द्राज सम्बन्धित पंचायत व्राधा, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 में दर्ज नहीं करवाया है।
अतः सर्वसाधारण व आम जनता को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी भी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगणों की शादी से सम्बन्धित पंचायत के अभिलेख में दर्ज करने बारे एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 27-11-2017 को सुबह 10.00 बजे या इससे पूर्व असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर अदालत पेश होकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी एतराज प्राप्त न होने की सूरत में नियमानुसार शादी दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 16-11-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।
मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0।
--------
ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0
केस नं0 : MT/2017
दिनांक 29-11-2017 1. श्री लुदर चन्द पुत्र श्री हरी राम, गांव लुहारदी, डा0 सचानी, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 2. श्रीमती किरना देवी पुत्री श्री थैलु राम, गांव व डा0 भलाण, तहसील भून्तर, जिला मण्डी, हि0 प्र0
. . प्रार्थीगण
बनाम
आम जनता
. . प्रत्यार्थी। विषय.-- प्रार्थना पत्र जेर धारा 5(4) हि0 प्र0 रजिस्ट्रीकरण नियम 2004 विवाह पंजीकरण बारे। उपरोक्त मामला में प्रार्थीगण उपरोक्त ने दिनांक 25-10-2017 को इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पेश किये हैं कि उन्होंने दिनांक 15-06-2017 को शादी कर ली है और तब से दोनोें पति पत्नी के रूप में रहते चले आ रहे हैं। परन्तु प्रार्थीगण ने अपनी शादी का इन्द्राज सम्बन्धित पंचायत जरी, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 में दर्ज नहीं करवाया है। अतः सर्वसाधारण व आम जनता को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी भी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगणों की शादी से सम्बन्धित पंचायत के अभिलेख में दर्ज करने बारे एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 27-11-2017 को सुबह 10.00 बजे या इससे पूर्व असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर अदालत पेश होकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी एतराज प्राप्त न होने की सूरत में नियमानुसार शादी दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 16-11-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।
हस्ताक्षरित/- मोहर। कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0।8292 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 28 नवम्बर, 2017/07 मार्गशीर्ष, 1939 ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0
तारीख पेशी 29-11-2017 केस नं0 : MT/2017
1. श्री कमलेश कुमार पुत्र श्री मोहन लाल, गांव भडोली, डा0 सचानी, तह0 भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 2. श्रीमती रीना पुत्री श्री राज कुमार, गांव बौहुगणा, डा0 गड़सा, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 . . प्रार्थीगण।
बनाम
. . प्रत्यार्थी। आम जनता
विषय.-- प्रार्थना पत्र जेर धारा 5(4) हि0 प्र0 रजिस्ट्रीकरण नियम 2004 विवाह पंजीकरण बारे।
उपरोक्त मामला में प्रार्थीगण उपरोक्त ने दिनांक 27-10-2017 को इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पेश किये हैं कि उन्होंने दिनांक 24-09-2014 को शादी कर ली है और तब से दोनोें पति पत्नी के रूप में रहते चले आ रहे हैं। परन्तु प्रार्थीगण ने अपनी शादी का इन्द्राज सम्बन्धित पंचायत व्राधा, तहसील भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 में दर्ज नहीं करवाया है।
अतः सर्वसाधारण व आम जनता को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी भी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगणों की शादी से सम्बन्धित पंचायत के अभिलेख में दर्ज करने बारे एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 29-11-2017 को सुबह 10.00 बजे या इससे पूर्व असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर अदालत पेश होकर अपना एतराज पेश कर सकता है। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी एतराज प्राप्त न होने की सूरत में नियमानुसार शादी दर्ज करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।
आज दिनांक 16-11-2017 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी हुआ।
मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, भून्तर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0।
--------
CHANGE OF NAME
I No. 145575-B Dinesh Kumar Sharma s/o Nathu Ram Sharma, V.P.O. Sanahi, Teh. Nadaun, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. declare that in my service record my wife name wrongly entered as Raj Devi instead of Raj Kumari.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA,
s/o Nathu Ram Sharma,
V.P.O. Sanahi, Teh. Nadaun,
Distt. Hamirpur, H.P.
नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है