Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 144, 11 October 2018

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित वीरवार, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

लोक निर्माण विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 1 अक्तूबर, 2018

सं0 पी0बी0डब्ल्यू0(बी0)एफ(5)16/2013.--यतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल को यह प्रतीत होता है कि हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार को सरकारी व्यय पर सार्वजनिक प्रयोजन हेतु नामत मुहाल पनंगा, तहसील मनाली, जिला कुल्लू, हि0 प्र0 में पनंगा से शांगचर सडक के निर्माण हेतु भूमि अर्जित करनी अपेक्षित है, 144-राजपत्र/2018-11-10-2018 (5235) 5236 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 अतएव एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि उक्त परिक्षेत्र में जैसा कि निम्न विवरणी में निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उपरोक्त प्रयोजन के लिए भूमि का अर्जन अपेक्षित है।

2. यह अधिसूचना ऐसे सभी व्यक्तियों को, जो इससे सम्बन्धित हो सकते हैं, की जानकारी के लिए भूमि अर्जन, पुनर्वास और पुनव्र्यवस्थापन में उचित प्रतिकर और पारदर्शिता अधिकार अधिनियम, 2013 (2013 का 30) की धारा-11 के उपबन्धों के अन्तर्गत जारी की जाती है।

3. पूर्वोक्त धारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए राज्यपाल हिमाचल प्रदेश इस समय इस उपक्रम में कार्यरत सभी अधिकारियों, उनके कर्मचारियों और श्रमिकों को इलाके की किसी भी भूमि में प्रवेश करने और सर्वेक्षण करने तथा उप धारा द्वारा अपेक्षित अथवा अनुमतः अन्य सभी कार्यो को करने के लिए सहर्ष प्राधिकार देते हैं।

4. कोई भी हितबद्ध व्यक्ति जिसे उक्त परिक्षेत्र में कथित भूमि के अर्जन पर कोई आपाि हो तो वह इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशित होने के साठ दिन की अवधि के भीतर लिखित रुप में भू-अर्जन समाहर्ता, लोक निर्माण विभाग, मण्डी (हि0 प्र0) के समक्ष अपनी आपाि दायर कर सकता है।

विवरणी

आदेश द्वारा, हस्तक्षरित/- (मनीषा नंदा) अति0 मुख्य सचिव (लोक निर्माण)।5237 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940

लोक निर्माण विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 1 अक्तूबर, 2018

सं0 पी0बी0डब्ल्यू0(बी0)एफ(5) 72/2016.--यतः हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल को यह प्रतीत होता है कि हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार को सरकारी व्यय पर सार्वजनिक प्रयोजन हेतु नामतः रेडू झिड़ीवाला, तहसील नालागढ़, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश में रा0 उच्च मार्ग-21, पिन्जौर-बद्‌दी-नालागढ़-स्वारघाट को चौड़ा करने के लिए भूमि अर्जित करनी अपेक्षित है, अतएव एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि उक्त परिक्षेत्र में जैसा कि निम्न विवरणी में निर्दिष्ट किया गया है, उपरोक्त प्रयोजन के लिए भूमि का अर्जन अपेक्षित है।

2. यह अधिसूचना ऐसे सभी व्यक्तियों को, जो इससे सम्बन्धित हो सकते हैं, की जानकारी के लिए भूमि अर्जन, पुनर्वास और पुनव्र्यवस्थापन में उचित प्रतिकर और पारदर्शिता अधिकार अधिनियम, 2013 (2013 का 30) की धारा-11 के उपबन्धों के अन्तर्गत जारी की जाती है।

3. पूर्वोक्त धारा द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश इस समय इस उपक्रम में कार्यरत सभी अधिकारियों उनके कर्मचारियों और श्रमिकों को इलाके की किसी भी भूमि में प्रवेश करने और सर्वेक्षण करने तथा उप धारा द्वारा अपेक्षित अथवा अनुमतः अन्य सभी कार्यो को करने के लिए सहर्ष प्राधिकार देते हैं।

4. कोई भी हितबद्ध व्यक्ति जिसे उक्त परिक्षेत्र में कथित भूमि के अर्जन पर कोई आपाि हो तो वह इस अधिसूचना के प्रकाशित होने के साठ दिन की अवधि के भीतर लिखित रुप में भू अर्जन समाहर्ता, लोक निर्माण विभाग, विन्टर फिल्ड शिमला, (हि0 प्र0) के समक्ष अपनी आपाि दायर कर सकता है।

विवरणी

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- (मनीषा नंदा), अति0 मुख्य सचिव (लोक निर्माण)।5238 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 TRAINING AND FOREIGN ASSIGNMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 002, the 6th October, 2018

No. Per. (Trg.)B(1)-1/2002-III.—On the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee held on 28-9-2018, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, is pleased to order the promotion of Dr. Rajeev Bansal, presently working as Deputy Director (Research) on adhoc basis to the post of Deputy Director (Research), Class-I (Gazetted) in the scale of Rs. 15600—3900+ Rs. 6600 Grade Pay on regular basis in SIRD at HIPA with immediate effect.

2. The above officer will remain on probation for a period of two years from the date of issue of his promotion order. He will exercise option under FR-22 for fixation of pay within a period of one month from the date of issue of this order.

By order, Sd/- (R. D. DHIMAN) Principal Secretary (Training and F.A.).

___________

बहुद्वेशीय परियोजनाए एवं ऊर्जा विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-2, 30 जुलाई, 2018

संख्या एम0 पी0 पी0-ए0(3)-2/2013-I.—हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश विद्युत वितरण प्रबन्धन उत्तरदायित्व अधिनियम, 2014 (2015 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 5) की धारा 1 की उप-धारा (4) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियाें का प्रयोग करते हुए, 22 जनवरी, 2015 को ऐसा दिन नियत करती है, जिससे उक्त अधिनियम प्रवृत होगा।

आदेश द्वारा, तरून कपूर, अतिरिक्त मुख्य सचिव (ऊर्जा)।

-------

MPP & POWER DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 30th July, 2018

No. MPP-A (3)-2/2013-I.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of Section-1 of the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Distribution Management Responsibility Act, 2014 (Act No. 5 of 2015), the Governor of Himachal Pradesh is pleased to appoint the 22nd January, 2015 as the date on which the said Act shall come into force.

By order, TARUN KAPOOR, Addl. Chief Secretary (Power).

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 4th October, 2018

No. Ind.-A(B)8-4/2017.—On the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, the Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to order the promotion of following Superintendent, Grade-II to the post of Manager, DIC (Class-II, Gazetted) in the pay scale of ` 10300- 34800+ ` 4400 Grade pay in the Department of Industries, Himachal Pradesh with immediate effect :—

1. Smt. Shyam Lata

2. Sh. Rajinder Singh

The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is further pleased to order the posting of above officers on their promotion as Manager, DIC (Class-II, Gazetted) against vacant post as under :—

The officers shall remain on probation for a period of two years. They will also exercise option for fixation of pay under the provisions of FR-22, within a period of one month from the date of issue of this notification.

The above officers are directed to join their duties within 10 days and submit joining report to this Office as well as to Director of Industries, H. P., failing which the promotion orders will automatically be treated as withdrawn and no separate orders will be issued in this regard.

By order, R. D. DHIMAN, IAS, Principal Secretary (Inds.).

__________

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

(Disaster Management)

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-2, the 29th September, 2018

No. Rev. (DMC)(F)4-2/2000/SCC.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh is pleased to notify Scheme on "Structural safety audit of life line buildings" as per the Annexure enclosed spelling out5240 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 the role of Stakeholders on the recommendations of State Executive Committee constituted as per provisions of Disaster Management Act, 2005 to build a safer and disaster resilient State by initiating proactive prevention, mitigation and preparedness to ensure minimize loss of life, livelihood and property with immediate effect.

All concerned stakeholder departments will implement the scheme in their respective departments in letter and spirit and send action plan and requirement of funds to the Revenue (DM) Department within a month's period.

By order, Sd/- (MANISHA NANDA) Additional Chief Secretary (Rev.-DM).

___________

Scheme

for

Structural Safety Audit of Lifeline Buildings

Implementation guidelines

________

Scheme for Structural Safety Audit of Lifeline Buildings

"Earthquakes don't kill; unsafe buildings do"

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

I. CONTEXT :

The State of Himachal Pradesh lies in the Himalayan Region. There has been an increase in population and infrastructures within State, in the last few decades. The fragile ecology and geology of the State coupled with large variations in Physio-Climatic conditions renders it vulnerable to vagaries of nature in one way or the other. Rapid urbanization and unplanned development has led to the situation that lakhs of people within the State are at risk from earthquake.

The Indian Standard code of practice for earthquake resistant design of structures, IS 1893 (2002), has identified 7 Districts of the region in Zone of most severe (Zone V) seismic hazard with the design peak ground acceleration as 0.36g. Remaining 5 Districts lie in zone of high seismic hazard (Zone IV) with design PGA as 0.24g. This region has felt large earthquakes in the past and the Seismotectonic maps prepared by State has shown some regions that are more active and entire State is at risk of being affected by a severe seismic event.

As per Hazard Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Atlas developed by the M/s TARU for the State, most of the buildings in the State can be divided into 5 types of construction. These are RC frame, Brick Masonry, Stone Masonry, Mud Houses and Hybrid Construction. Construction of RC frame structures has gained momentum in recent years. The masons were however not trained in the use of the new building material & construction methods. This is enough to highlight structural vulnerability of the built environment, particularly to seismic tremors to which the State is highly Vulnerable.

Hasty population growth and lack of awareness of earthquake risk and scanty building performance has been singled out as the most important constituent source of the ever-increasing earthquake risk within the State. Therefore, improving seismic performance of new constructions and improving the same for the existing buildings should become one of the main thrusts towards earthquake safety in Himachal Pradesh. Promoting safer building construction is an objective necessity for Himachal where urban population is increasing faster.

Rapid growth of urban population demands a very high rate of building production, which, in the absence of proper building permit process, and a general lack of the knowledge and skills for earthquake resistant construction, end up in shanty construction that are extremely vulnerable to earthquake. Most residential buildings, even in urban areas of Himachal Pradesh, do not receive any rational design for strength.

Even though most municipalities do have a system of building permits, there is no provision in the process to check strength criteria. The building permit process takes into account only the compliance related to planning such as the ground coverage, floor-area ratio (FAR), and the stipulations of the building by-laws (height, provision of toilet, sewer and solid waste disposal etc.). There is poor institutional and technical capacity within the local authorities for implementing strength-related provisions if they were to be introduced into the building permit process.

II. PURPOSE OF STRUCTURAL SAFETY AUDIT :

The norm according to the model bye-law no. 77 for co-operative housing societies, it is mandatory that if the age of a building is 15 to 30 years, a structural audit must be carried out once in five years and for buildings older than 30 years it should be carried out once in three years. One may, however, go for it even earlier if one suspects the condition of the building to be bad.

The main purpose of the structural safety audit is an overall performance check-up of a building like a doctor examines a patient. It ensures that the building and its premises are safe and have no risk. It analysis and suggests appropriate repairs and retrofitting measures required for the buildings to perform better in its service life. Structural Audit is done by an experienced and licensed consultant.

• To save human life and building. • To understand the condition of building. • To find critical areas to repair immediately. • To comply with statutory requirements. • To enhance life cycle of building suggesting preventive and corrective measures like repair and retrofitting.

• To proactively assist the residents and the society to understand the seriousness of the problems and the urgency required to attend the same.

III. PROMINENCE OF STRUCTURAL SAFETY AUDIT :

Structural Audit enables the organizations to address the issues by identifying the following:—

(i) To recognize the types of structural defects.

(ii) To identify any signs of material deterioration.

(iii) To identify any signs of structural distress and deformation.

(iv) To identify any alteration and addition in the structure, misuse of structure which may result in overloading.

(v) Structural Audit is an important tool for knowing the real status of the old buildings.

(vi) The Audit highlights & investigate all the risk areas, critical areas and whether the building needs

• Immediate attention. It should also cover the structural analysis of the existing frame and

• Pinpoints the weak structural areas for static, floods and earthquake loads.

IV. SAFE LIFELINE BUILDINGS :

W.J Hall (1991) states, "Within a broad definition lifeline can be defined as those utilities, facilities, structures and equipment that support & enables people to survive or to continue doing something, often by providing an essential connection at the time of disaster." Whereas, D. C. Hopkins (1991) believes that physically it should be any engineered system which we rely on and which is of vital importance in sustaining the physical and economic life of a community.

Kircher et al, (1997) as it is always said "Earthquake don't kill people, buildings do". Buildings have two important components: structural and non-structural. Structural components are the building load bearing elements like foundations, columns, beams and walls etc. Non-structural components include architectural and design features like doors, windows, false ceiling etc. and services include features like electrical and plumbing fixtures. Buildings fail in the event of earthquake when major damage occurs to structural systems.

(a) Bhuj District Hospital Building.—The Bhuj earthquake of 26 January, 2001 was one of the most severe disasters in recent times. The earthquake, measuring 6.9 on the Richter scale, destroyed over 12 lakh houses across Gujarat, but the worst hit was Bhuj, 60 km from the epicenter at Bhachau. Some of its landmark buildings, like the nine-storey Sahajanand Towers came crashing down, district hospital, collector office etc. and over 38,000 homes were collapsed in the city, killing 2,370 people. The only civil hospital in Bhuj was damaged, killing more than 200 persons including doctors, nurses, patients, visitors and staff. On the other hand, the District Collector office which is the most important official for handling emergencies and development activities of the district collapsed. The situation was similar for many other district-level offices and those at sub-divisions and talukas.

(b) Secretariat Building Gangtok.—The M 6.9 earthquake hit Sikkim on 18th September, 2011 with its epicenter located near India-Nepal border, about 68 km NW of Gangtok and at a focal depth of 19.7 km as reported by USGS. Sikkim earthquake caused severe damage to build environment across the State of Sikkim and partly in Darjeeling district of neighbouring State of West Bengal.

It also triggered numerous landslides that caused damage to the buildings in several parts of the State. Secretariat building in Gangtok is one of the most important buildings of Sikkim, which houses the offices of chief functionaries of state government, including the Chief Minister. The building was damaged earlier during the earthquake of February 2006 and similar damage is repeated during this earthquake, also. The building has undergone major damage particularly to the columns at the interface of the two blocks, apparently due to pounding. The infills have been badly damaged particularly at the corners of the building. In Sikkim, it is a practice to provide the infills outside the columns. This makes the corners very vulnerable and the infills fail in wedge type corner failure combined with out-of-plane action.

Therefore, preparedness and mitigation measures should include retrofitting of life-line buildings for not only saving lives of the vulnerable people, but also to ensure prompt and efficient response to disasters. Ideally, buildings should be designed with respect to earthquake such that they survive in moderate earthquakes with non-structural damages and resist collapse with structural damages in strong and major earthquakes and ensure that no life is lost because of the collapse of buildings and also remain functional so that the response in post disaster situation is uninterrupted.

In order to ensure that such instances don't happen within the State of Himachal Pradesh, the State Executive Committee (SEC) took decision to ensure the safety measures.

The initial focus for structural safety audit and retrofitting will be on government and public buildings. In the first phase the lifeline buildings which will be shortlisted for Structural Safety Audit would be as follows :—

A. State Headquarter :

(i) H. P. Secretariat

(ii) The Governance House

(iii) H. P. Vidhan Sabha

(iv) H. P. High Court

(v) All India Radio

(vi) D. D. Shimla

(vii) Police Headquarter

(viii) State Treasury

B. District Headquarters :

(i) The Collectorate

(ii) The Superintendent of Police Office

(iii) The Zonal Hospital

(iv) BSNL Structure

(v) Fire Station

(vi) Police Station

(vii) Important Water Storage Tanks

(viii) Critical Bridges

(ix) District Treasury

(x) Primary Health Centres

Ten structures of all from all the District Headquarters and five-ten important buildings at State Headquarters may be shortlisted.

The detailed Architectural and Structural plans of the buildings must be available. If the Architectural plans and Structural plans are not available, the same can be prepared by any Engineer by measuring the size of the bldg. & locating the position of the columns, beams and size of all such structural elements.

If all the data required for structural audit is not sufficient by Visual Inspection, then Various Non-Destructive Test can be conducted. Highlight the critical areas and decide the method for repairs. Implementation of suggested repairs and improvements in Structural Audit can be useful.

VII. PROCESS TO STRUCTURAL SAFETY :

Structural Safety Audit will be conducted in different phases as given below :

(1) Phase-I :

The Structural Safety Audit is a purely technical achievement where technically sound personal/Experienced Civil Engineer will conduct the audit with a few hand held equipment's in following steps :

Step I.—Keen observations shall be done for RVS only by technically sound personal/ Experienced Civil Engineer. During Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) period, photographs also have to be taken for further analysis & identification of the building. The visible defects/damages, disorder and any infirmity have to be keenly observed and list out. Laptop/Tablet will be used as record media for collected data and photographs.

Step II.—The Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) equipment Schmidt Hammer is to be applied if required to check the quality of concrete used in the building.

Step III.—Built-up area and height of the building shall be measured and recorded.

Step IV.—Design of structure (if available) and/or building permission will be verified with the compliance of actual structure of the building by the technically sound person.

Step V.—For under construction building, quality of materials used has to be checked and inform to builder to check the progress work to get the earthquake resistance standard/safety so that, if any anomaly found, retrofitting can be done immediately. Subsequently, the records submitted to the concern authority i.e. 1st party.

Step VI.—The technical report (Phase-1) will be prepared within 7 (seven) days from the date of completion of field works and submitted the same to the 1st party.

Recommendation based on above study for each building :

(a) Recommendation will mainly focus on the structural safety assessment of each building examined and suggest corrective/remedial measures, if any.

(b) It will also recommend if further NDT is recommended alongwith reasons for which the NDT is recommended and such test is required to be conducted.

(c) If, however as per the Phase-I study, no further structural assessment and audit is recommended for any building, the same also required to be pointed out by concerned experts.

(2) PHASE-II :

After recommendation of Structural Safety Audit and structural inspection in Phase-I Non- Destructive Testing (NDT) service may have to be done for checking overall quality & safety of buildings with the help of NDT equipment's. Accordingly, the data shall be sorting & analyze for proper identification of weakest points and safety level of the building that Retrofitting can be done as the remedial measures taken by the owner of the building. However, the consultancy of retrofitting is not covered within the scope of this proposal. In case of under constructed building, the Structural Safety audit shall be in phased manner. The NDT equipment's are also applicable in this type of audit.

(i) The function and features of usable NDT equipment's in both new and existing

building are summarized as follows :

(a) Pile Integrity Test.—Pile Integrity Testing (PIT) is a Non-Destructive Testing equipment shall be used for Technical Audit of foundation of the building5247 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 especially for pile foundation whereas the parameters like Length of the Pile, Quality of pile, any Crack, break, voids inside the pile etc. can be determined.

(b) Rebar Detection.—The compact, lightweight Profometer 5+rebar detection equipment shall be used to detect the position of Rebar (Reinforcement), Concrete Coverage, Span and diameter of rebar.

(c) Corrosion Analyzing.—The Canin+, the corrosion analyzing instrument shall be used for assessment of conductivity of concrete and presence of corrosion of steel inside concrete.

(d) Ultrasonic Crack detector.—Tico-is an ultrasonic instrument shall be used to detect the uniformity of concrete, cavities, cracks and defects, the modulus of elasticity and compressive strength.

(e) Compressive Strength of Concrete (Quality Test).—The Schmidt Hammer (Digi-Schmidt) is one of the modern & sophisticated Non-Destructive Testing equipment shall be used to determine the compressive strength of any type of concrete. It is also the prime equipment for evaluating the quality of concrete.

(ii) Basic Technical Requirement and Specification :

(a) Nature of Structural Safety Audit.—Nature of audit will be the Structural safety audit of all Ground+2, G+3 R.C.C. buildings.

(b) To use up-to-date technical machinery and know how without damaging existing buildings.

(c) The firms/institutions should have technical knowledge, adequate qualified technical manpower and equipment for conducting such safety audit.

The consultant may also suggest and engage any other method as may be suitable to arrive at a definite conclusion with prior approval.

Recommendation based on the NDT and testing report should consist of the report of overall quality of the building indicating the weakest points for safety and prospective remedial or retrofitting measures for sound condition. All report and documents shall be in English with 3 (three) hardcopies and 1 (one) soft copy.

(iii) Test data Collection and record :

Before testing the work piece (RCC Building), the test point shall be prepared by rubbing and cleaning that actual data can be obtained by applying the NDT equipment's. The test data shall be properly collected by equipment automatically and subsequently manually recorded. Further, the data shall be sorted and categorized for preparation of Technical audit report.

(iv) Technical Audit Report:

A Structural Inspection report (Phase-II) shall be prepared performing the Non-Destructive Testing of the building. This report consists of categorized Test data, Photographs of the building alongwith the expert view (suggestion) and shall be submitted to DDMA & HPSDMA respectively.

For Continuous improvements in structural and non-structural measures for earthquake risk reduction will improve only if building can be made safe against earthquake by retrofitting and for this SDMA will engage knowledge Institution i.e. National Institute of Technology (NIT), Hamirpur and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mandi. They will play role of Knowledge Partner to Conduct Training for engineers from PWD, IPH, RD and ULBs, Conducting RVS, Detailed Structural Audit, recommendations for retrofitting of buildings and preparation of estimates for retrofitting and will providing Technical assistance and supervision for retrofitting within the State.

IX. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS :

The expenses for training of engineers and consultancy charges of National Institute of Technology (NIT), Hamirpur and Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mandi will be borne by the Disaster Management Cell. Whereas, the Cost of Retrofitting will be borne by the concerned department.

X. PROPOSED BUDGET :

The proposed estimated budget for the Structural Safety Audit of Lifeline Buildings will be Rs. 50 lakhs (Training and Consultancy Charges) to be met out of 14th Finance Commission Grand-in-Aid or other funds available with DMC. Funds may also be obtained from other source such as Govt. of India Scheme(s), Corporate Social Responsibility, other donor agencies, etc.

XI. MONITORING AND EVALUATION :

Monitoring and Evaluation of the scheme will be done by the Disaster Management Cell, Department of Revenue.

XII. AMELIORATION-STRUCTURAL SAFETY :

Based on the audit findings and recommendations different measures of repairs and strengthening are carried out. Strengthening of structural members can be achieved by replacing poor quality or defective material with better quality material, by attaching additional load-bearing material, such as high quality concrete, additional steel, thin steel plates, various types of fiber reinforced polymer sheets, and so on, and by the redistribution of the load such as by adding a steel supporting system.

The structural diagnosis is vast, important and highly responsible work which is connected with lives of human beings. It is mandatory and advisable to carry out the periodical structural audit of the buildings by professional experts and act immediately through recommendations provided in audit report.

The purpose of strengthening is to increase the load-carrying capacity or stability of a structure with respect to its previous condition. The success of repairs and restoration is always based on thorough knowledge, correct diagnosis and in-depth studies of problems in building, proper repair practices and finally socio-economic considerations. The effective implementation of auditing enhances the life span of structure, prevents deterioration of building leading to sustainability.

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, H.P.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Om Prakash s/o Brij Lal, r/o Village Bhamnoh, P. O. Bagwara, Tehsil Bamson at Tauni Devi, District Hamirpur (H.P.) and

2. Smt. Sunita Devi d/o Prithi Chand, r/o Village Hayor, P.O. Awah Devi, Tehsil . .Applicants. Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Om Prakash & Smt. Sunita Devi have filed an application u/s16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 02-08-2018 at Awah Devi Temple, Tehsil Bhoranj, Distt. Hamirpur according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 25-10-2018. The objection received after 25-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 22-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur.

________

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, H.P.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Animesh Gautam s/o Piar Chand, r/o Village Susnal, P.O. Barota, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.) at present residing c/o Sunny Rangra s/o Bhag Singh,Village Panyala, P.O. Khiyah, Tehsil & Distt. Hamirpur and

2. Naresh Kumari d/o Bhagwan Dass, r/o Village Dakhyut, Post Office Dangar, Tehsil . .Applicants. Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Animesh Gautam & Naresh Kumari have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 22-09-2018 at Gasota Mahadev Mandir, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.) according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 29-10-2018. The objection received after 29-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 22-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur.

________

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, H.P.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Rohit s/o Kamlesh Singh, r/o 2B2 Chopasani Housing Board, 1st Puliya, Jodhpur (Rajsthan) and

2. Anupama d/o Naresh Kango, r/o Pratap Nagar, Ward No. 3, Mauja Bajuri, Tehsil & . .Applicants. District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Rohit & Anupama have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 27-06-2018 at Jhaniyari Devi Mandir, Tehsil & District Hamirpur, according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 29-10-2018. The objection received after 29-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 22-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur.

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, H.P.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

1. Sh. Sumit Kumar s/o Bhupen Singh, r/o Village & PO Didwin Tikker, Tehsil & District Hamirpur.

2. Pooja Devi d/o Sh. Prem Chand, Village Jhandwin, P. O. Ludder Mahadev, Tehsil . .Applicants. Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Sumit Kumar & Pooja Devi have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 20-09-2018 at Gasota Mahadev Mandir, Tehsil & District Hamirpur, according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 29-10-2018. The objection received after 29-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 24-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur.

________

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, H.P.A.S., Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

1. Shashi Pal Sharma s/o Krishan Dev, r/o Village Dalyahu (Bari), P.O. Bari, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.) and

2. Supriya d/o Kashmir Chand, r/o Village Jahu Khurd, P. O. Jahu, Tehsil Bhoranj, . .Applicants. District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice of the intended Marriage.

Shashi Pal Sharma and Supriya have filed an application u/s 5 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned in which they stated that they intend to solemnized their marriage within next three calendar months. Therefore, the General Public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 25-10-2018. The objection received after 25-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 22-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Sd/- Seal. Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur.

________________________________

ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 श्री संजीव कुमार सुपुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश, निवासी गांव टिक्कर, डा0 विहडू, तहसील बड़सर, जिला . . प्रार्थी। हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादीगण। विषय.--जन्म तिथि नोटिस के माध्यम से प्रकाशन बारे।

प्रार्थना-पत्र श्री संजीव कुमार सुपुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश, निवासी गांव टिक्कर, डा0 विहडू, तहसील बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 ने हाजर अदालत आकर दायर किया है। प्रार्थी का आवेदन है कि मैं भारतीय नौ सेना से सेवा निवृत्त हुआ हूं। मेरी पत्नी रीना कुमारी का जन्म मुताबिक दस्तावेज (आधार कार्ड, पैन कार्ड, जन्म प्रमाण-पत्र व स्कूल प्रमाण-पत्र) दिनांक 05-12-1980 को हुआ है परन्तु भारतीय नौ सेना के रिकार्ड में इसकी जन्म तिथि 05-11-1982 दर्ज है, जोकि गलत दर्ज है। प्रार्थी का आवेदन है कि उक्त वर्णित प्रकरण का प्रकाशन राजपत्र हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला के माध्यम से करवाया जावे ताकि रीना देवी की सही जन्म तिथि भारतीय नौ सेना (Indian Navy) के रिकार्ड में दर्ज करवाई जा सके।

अतः आम जनता व इलाका वासियों को इस अदालत द्वारा जारी नोटिस/इश्तहार के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी को भी रीना कुमारी पत्नी श्री संजीव कुमार पुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश की जन्म तिथि बारे आपत्ति हो तो वह अपना एतराज असालतन या वकालतन हाजर अदालत आकर दिनांक 25-10-2018 से पूर्व पेश कर सकता है। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी एतराज मान्य नहीं होगा। आम जनता के गैर-हाजिर रहने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

नोटिस आज दिनांक 25-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं कार्यालय मोहर अदालत द्वारा पारित हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार,

बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।5253 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 श्री संजीव कुमार सुपुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश, निवासी गांव टिक्कर, डा0 विहडू, तहसील बड़सर, जिला . . प्रार्थी। हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

. . प्रतिवादीगण। आम जनता

विषय.--नोटिस के माध्यम से नाम प्रकाशन बारे।

प्रार्थना-पत्र श्री संजीव कुमार सुपुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश, निवासी गांव टिक्कर, डा0 विहडू, तहसील बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 ने हाजर अदालत आकर दायर किया है। प्रार्थी का आवेदन है कि मैं भारतीय नौ सेना से सेवा निवृत्त हुआ हूं। मेरे पुत्र का नाम मुताबिक दस्तावेज (पहचान-पत्र, जन्म प्रमाण-पत्र व स्कूल प्रमाण-पत्र) शुभम ठाकुर है परन्तु भारतीय नौ सेना के रिकार्ड में इसका नाम गलती से शुभम ढटवालिया दर्ज है। प्रार्थी का आवेदन है कि उक्त वर्णित प्रकरण का प्रकाशन राजपत्र हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला के माध्यम से करवाया जावे ताकि मैं अपने पुत्र का सही नाम भारतीय नौ सेना (Indian Navy) के रिकार्ड में दर्ज करवा सकूं।

अतः आम जनता व इलाका वासियों को इस अदालत द्वारा जारी नोटिस/इश्तहार के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि किसी को भी शुभम ठाकुर पुत्र श्री संजीव कुमार पुत्र श्री ओम प्रकाश के नाम बारे कोई आपत्ति हो तो वह अपना एतराज असालतन या वकालतन हाजर अदालत आकर दिनांक 24-10-2018 से पूर्व पेश कर सकता है। इसके उपरान्त कोई भी एतराज मान्य नहीं होगा। आम जनता के गैर-हाजिर रहने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी।

नोटिस आज दिनांक 25-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं कार्यालय मोहर अदालत द्वारा पारित हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार,

बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।

----------

ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 श्री नगीना राम पुत्र मुन्शी मुख्तयारे आम देवकी देवी पत्नी स्व0 आन्नत राम, निवासी गांव सहेली, . . प्रार्थी। तप्पा कंगड, तहसील बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादीगण। दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 108 भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872.

प्रार्थना-पत्र श्रीमती देवकी देवी पत्नी स्व0 आन्नत राम, निवासी गांव सहेली, तप्पा कंगड, तहसील बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 ने अपने मुख्तयारे आम नगीना राम के माध्यम से इस अदालत में दायर किया है कि उसका बेटा जयपाल पुत्र स्व0 आन्नत राम, निवासी गांव सहेली, तप्पा कंगड, तहसील बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 लगभग पिछले 26 वर्षों से लापता है। जिसे तलाश करने का भरसक प्रयास किया गया परन्तु कोई सफलता हासिल नहीं हुई है। अंततः दिनांक 02-12-2016 को प्रार्थी ने इसकी गुमशुद्धा रिपोर्ट 5254 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 पुलिस थाना बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर में दर्ज करवाई थी परन्तु आज दिन तक कोई सुराग हासिल नहीं हुआ। प्रार्थी का आवेदन है कि जयपाल पुत्र आन्नत राम की मृत्यु प्रविष्टि बाद उद्‌घोषणा के उपरान्त इसकी अचल सम्पति का उल-खबरी इन्तकाल सम्बन्धित कानूनी वारसान के नाम किया जावे।

अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस नोटिस के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि उक्त जयपाल पुत्र स्व0 आन्नत राम की अचल सम्पति का इन्तकाल सम्बन्धित कानूनी वारसान के नाम किये जाने बारे किसी को भी कोई आपत्ति/एतराज हो तो वह अपना उजर असालतन या वकालतन दिनांक 25-10-2018 से पूर्व हाजर अदालत आकर पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाएगी और जयपाल की अचल सम्पति का उल-खबरी इन्तकाल दर्ज करने बारे आदेश नियमानुसार पारित कर दिये जाएंगे।

आज दिनांक 20-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं कार्यालय मोहर अदालत द्वारा पारित हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार,

बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।

----------

ब अदालत विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी, बड़सर, उप-मण्डल बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0 1. Ramesh Chand s/o Leharu Ram, r/o Village Chowki, P.O. Baragram, Tehsil Dhatwal, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

2. Sarita Kumari w/o Sanjay Kumar, r/o Village & P.O. Bhager, Tehsil Ghumarwin, . . प्रार्थी। District Bilaspur (H.P.)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी एक व दो ने इस न्यायालय में विवाह पंजीकरण करवाने का आवेदन किया है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता व उपरोक्त आवेदनकर्ता के माता-पिता को इस विवाह के पंजीकरण बारे एतराज हो तो दिनांक 01-11-2018 या इससे पूर्व प्रातः 10.00 बजे इस न्यायालय में आपाि दर्ज करवा सकते हैंं। इस तिथि के बाद कोई उजर स्वीकार नहीं किया जावेगा। आज दिनांक 25-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर एवं मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी, बड़सर, जिला हमीरपुर, हि0 प्र0।

--------

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, HPAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

1. Rozu Deen s/o Shri Kaku Deen, r/o Village & P.O. Khiyah, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)5255 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 and 2. Sonu Devi d/o Abdul Mazeed, r/o Village Nera Kund, P.O. Tambol, Tehsil Naina Devi, District Bilaspur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Rozu Deen and Sonu Devi have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 28-02-2017 at Village & P.O. Khiyah, Tehsil & District Hamirpur according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 29-10-2018. The objection received after 29-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 28-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

_____________

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, HPAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

1. Gurdit Singh s/o Shri Man Singh, r/o Guru Angad Dev Colony Jandauli, Suharon, District Patiala (Pb.)

and

2. Sudesh Kumari d/o Prittam Singh wd/o Surender Singh, Village Matahani, P.O. Daruhi, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public Subject.—Notice of Intended Marriage.

Gurdit Singh and Sudesh Kumari have filed an application under section 5 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned in which they have stated that they intend to solemnize their marriage within next three calendar months.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 29-10-2018. The objection if any, received after 29-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 28-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Sd/- Seal. Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

___________

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, HPAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

1. Abinash Rana s/o Prem Chand, r/o Village Nara, Post Office & Tehsil Galore, District Hamirpur (H.P.) c/o Rajesh Kumar s/o Shakti Chand, r/o Village Kaswar, P.O. Masyana, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)

and

2. Jyoti Banyal d/o Shri Paramjeet, r/o Village Kardho, Post Office Panyali, Tehsil Nadaun, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Abinash Rana and Smt. Jyoti Banyal have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 21-09-2018 at Jhaniari Devi Temple, Tehsil & District Hamirpur according to Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 30-10-2018. The objection received after 30-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 28-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal. Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

In the Court of Smt. Shilpi Beakta, HPAS, Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

1. Pankaj Thakur s/o Shri Mohinder Singh, r/o Village Matahani, Post Office Daruhi, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)

and

2. Sakshi Jaswal d/o Shri Rajesh Jaswal, r/o House No. 112, Ward No. 6, Hamirpur, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (H.P.)

. . Applicants.

Versus

General Public Subject.— Notice for Registration of Marriage.

Sh. Pankaj Thakur and Sakshi Jaswal have filed an application u/s 16 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned in which they have stated that they have solemnized their marriage on 02-03-2018 at Village Matahani, Post Office Daruhi, Tehsil & District Hamirpur as per Hindu rites and customs.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 30-10-2018. The objection received after 30-10-2018 will not be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued today on 28-09-2018 under my hand and seal of the court.

Sd/- Seal. Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hamirpur (H.P.).

__________

ब अदालत तहसीलदार एवं कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 श्री Parshottam Singh बनाम

आम जनता विषय.--प्रार्थना-पत्र जेरे धारा 13(3) हिमाचल प्रदेश पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

नोटिस बनाम आम जनता।

श्री Parshottam Singh पुत्र Late Saran Dass, निवासी V.P.O. Dari, तहसील धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा ने इस अदालत में शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसके पुत्र का नाम Vikas Singh की जन्म तिथि 16-07-1993 है परन्तु एम0सी0 Dharamshala में जन्म पंजीकृत न है। अतः इसे पंजीकृत किये जाने के आदेश दिये जायें। इस नोटिस के द्वारा समस्त जनता को तथा सम्बन्धित सम्बन्धियों को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी को उपरोक्त बच्चे Vikas Singh का जन्म पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह हमारी अदालत में दिनांक 22-10-2018 को असालतन या वकालतन हाजिर आकर अपना 5258 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 एतराज पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा मुताबिक शपथ-पत्र जन्म तिथि पंजीकृत किये जाने बारे आदेश पारित कर दिये जायेंगे।

आज दिनांक 12-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, धर्मशाला, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

-------------

ब अदालत श्री संजय कुमार हि0प्र0से0, विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी धीरा, उप-मण्डल धीरा, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0

1. अशीष सूद आयु 33 वर्ष पुत्र विनोद कुमार सूद, निवासी गांव वलोटी, डा0 धीरा, उप-तहसील धीरा, जिला कांगड़ा।

2. शुरभी आयु 33 वर्ष पुत्री राम गोपाल सूद, निवासी ओक व्यू, लक्कड़ बाजार, तहसील जिला शिमला .. प्रार्थीगण।

बनाम

.. प्रतिवादी। आम जनता

आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि प्रार्थी एक व दो ने इस न्यायालय में विवाह पंजीकरण करवाने का निवेदन किया है। अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता व उपरोक्त आवेदनकर्ता के माता-पिता को इस विवाह के पंजीकरण बारे एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 08-11-2018 या इससे पूर्व प्रातः 10.00 बजे तक इस न्यायालय में आपत्ति दर्ज करवा सकते हैं इस तिथि के बाद कोई उजर स्वीकार नहीं किया जायेगा। आज दिनांक 24-09-2018 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत द्वारा जारी किया गया।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

विवाह पंजीकरण अधिकारी धीरा, उप-मण्डल धीरा,

जिला कांगड़ा, हि0प्र0।

-------------

In the Court of Shri Anil Sharma, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (R),

District Shimla (H. P.)

Smt. Bayasa Devi w/o Shri Sunder Singh, r/o Village Sawn, P.O. Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Whereas Smt. Bayasa Devi w/o Shri Sunder Singh, r/o Village Sawn, P.O. Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh has filed an application alongwith affidavit in the court of undersigned under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 to enter the date of death of her mother-in-law named Smt. Ramku w/o Late Sh. Tulsia, Village Sawn, P.O.

Durgapur, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Gram Panchayat Ghaini, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla.

Hence, this proclamation is issued to the general public if they have any objection/claim regarding date of death of above named in the record of Secy., Birth and Death, Gram Panchayat Ghaini, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla may file their claims/objections on or before one month of publication of this notice in Govt. Gazette in this court, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Issued today 04-10-2018 under my signature and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Shimla (R), District Shimla, H.P.

__________

In the Court of Shri Narayan Chauhan, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar)

Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Smt. Talaki KC w/o Sh. Parveen, r/o Hari Niwas, Vill. & P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Smt. Talaki KC w/o Sh. Parveen, r/o Hari Niwas, Vill. & P.O. Saproon, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents for enter the date of birth of her daughter named as Puja who was born on 06-01-2015 at home r/o Hari Niwas, Vill. & P.O. Saproon Solan, Tehsil Solan, but her date of birth could not be entered in the record of M.C. Solan.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Puja d/o Sh. Parveen and Smt. Talaki may submit their objection in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 29th October, 2018 at 10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 29th day of September, 2018.

Seal.

NARAYAN CHAUHAN, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Solan, District Solan, H. P.

In the Court of Shri Narayan Chauhan, Assistant Collector, (Ist GRADE)-cum-Tehsildar,

Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh

Anil s/o Sh. Shri Ram, Ashwani s/o Sh. Shri Ram, Sarita d/o Sh. Shri Ram . .Applicant.

Versus

Ashok Kumar s/o Sh. Shri Ram, Anjli d/o Sh. Shri Ram

. .Respondents.

In the matter of mutation No. 2279 Mauja Ser-45 (Hadbast No. 45 under Tehsil Solan for

inheritance of diseased Smt. Dayal Devi w/o Sh Shri Ram.

Whereas, in the above noted case it has been proved to the satisfaction of this court that the service upon the respondents mentioned below is not possible by an ordinary mode of service.

Hence this proclamation, under order 5 Rule 20 CPC is hereby issued against them requiring the respondents to appear in this court on 25-10-2018 at 2.00 P.M. personally or through agent or pleader to defend the case, failing which they will be heard ex-parte.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 29th day of September, 2018.

Seal.

NARAYAN CHAUHAN, Assistant Collector (Ist. GRADE)-cum-Tehsildar,

Solan, District Solan, H. P.

___________

In the Court of Shri Narayan Chauhan, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar)

Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Sh. Devender Kumar s/o Sh. R.P. Vashistha, r/o H.N. 28, Waverly Lodge, V.P.O. Subathu, . .Applicant. Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Sh. Devender Kumar s/o Sh. R.P. Vashistha, r/o H.N. 28, Waverly Lodge, V.P.O. Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents for enter the date of birth of his son Abhishek Vashishtha s/o Devender Kumar, who was born on 16-02-2003 at Waverly Lodge, Vill. & P.O. Subathu, Tehsil Solan, Himachal Pradesh but his date of birth could not be entered in the record of Cant Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Abhishek Vashishtha may submit their objection in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 03-11-2018 at 10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Seal.

NARAYAN CHAUHAN, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Solan, District Solan, H. P.

___________

In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the

powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954

Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Instt. : 28-09-2018 Pending for : 29-10-2018 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.

Notice to the General Public.

Whereas, Shri Jaibinder Singh s/o Shri Dila Ram, r/o Village Nichla Khera, P.O. Khera, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Rani Devi d/o Sh. Bishmber Dass w/o Shri Jaibinder Singh s/o Shri Dila Ram, r/o Village Nichla Khera, P.O. Khera, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 11-03-2001;

And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.

Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 29-10-2018 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 29-10-2018, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on 28-09-2018.

Seal.

Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,

Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.

____________

In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the

powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954

Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Instt. : 28-09-2018 Pending for : 29-10-2018 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.

Whereas, Shri Rajinder Kumar s/o Shri Ram Parkash, r/o Village Miyanpur (Baglehar), P.O. Panjehra, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Kirna Devi d/o Sh. Balbir Singh w/o Shri Rajinder Kumar s/o Shri Ram Parkash, r/o Village Miyanpur (Baglehar), P.O. Panjehra, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 20-04-2018;

And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.

Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 29-10-2018 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 29-10-2018, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on 28-09-2018.

Seal.

Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,

Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.

____________

In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the

powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954

Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Instt. : 28-09-2018 Pending for : 29-10-2018 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.

Notice to the General Public.

Whereas, Sahil Khan s/o Shri Nathu Khan, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, House No. 118, Near PWD Rest House Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. and Nishad d/o Akbar Ali w/o Sahil Khan s/o Shri Nathu Khan, r/o Ward No. 2 Nalagarh, House No. 118, Near PWD Rest House Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh District Solan, H. P. has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 06-08-2018;

And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.

Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 29-10-2018 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 29-10-2018, it will be5263 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on 28-09-2018.

Seal.

Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,

Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.

____________

In the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the

powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954

Case No. : ..../ 2018 Date of Instt. : 29-09-2018 Pending for : 29-10-2018 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.

Notice to the General Public.

Whereas, Sh. Lalit Kumar s/o Shri Ashwani Kumar, r/o Ward No. 5 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. and Smt. Priyanka Thakur d/o Sh. Sushil Thakur w/o Sh. Lalit Kumar s/o Shri Ashwani Kumar, r/o Ward No. 5 Nalagarh, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P. has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 21-09-2018;

And, whereas both these applicants have submitted in their application and in their affidavits that they were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.

Therefore, by this notice the public in general is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 29-10-2018 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 29-10-2018, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on 29-09-2018.

Seal.

Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,

Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.

____________

Before Chhavi Nanta, Sub Divisional Magistrate Arki,

District Solan, H. P.

Case No. : 10/ 2018 Date of Institution : 28-09-2018 Date of Decision Pending for 30-10-2018 Shri Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Babu Ram, resident of Village Kotlu, P.O. Parnu, Tehsil Arki, . . Applicant. District Solan, H. P.

General Public

..Respondents.

Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death

Registration Act, 1969.

Proclamation :

Shri Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Babu Ram, resident of Village Kotlu, P.O. Parnu, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H. P. has filed a case under Section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that her daughter namely Gunjan born on 10-07-2017 at Village Kotlu, Tehsil Arki, but her date of birth could not be entered in the birth records of Gram Panchayat Parnu, Tehsil Arki, District Solan H.P. by the applicant in time.

Therefore, by this proclamation the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Gunjan d/o Sh. Manoj Kumar & Smt. Manohrma Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 30-10-2018 at 10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.

Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 28th day of September, 2018.

Seal.

Sd/-

(CHHAVI NANTA) HAS,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Arki, District Solan, H. P.

__________

Before Chhavi Nanta, Sub Divisional Magistrate Arki,

District Solan, H. P.

Case No. : 09/ 2018 Date of Institution : 28-09-2018 Date of Decision Pending for 30-10-2018 Smt. Vandna Devi w/o Shri Rajeev Kumar, resident of Village Dasernwala, P.O. . . Applicant. Bhararighat, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H. P.

Versus

General Public

..Respondent.

Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death

Registration Act, 1969.

Proclamation :

Smt. Vandna Devi w/o Shri Rajeev Kumar, resident of Village Dasernwala, P.O. Bhararighat, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H. P. has filed a case under Section 13(3) of Birth &5265 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 11 अक्तूबर, 2018/19 आश्विन, 1940 Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that her daughter namely Ishani born on 09-05-2016 at Village Daseranwala, Tehsil Arki, but her date of birth could not be entered in the birth records of Gram Panchayat Daseran, Tehsil Arki, District Solan H.P. by the applicant in time.

Therefore, by this proclamation the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Ishani d/o Sh. Rajeev Kumar & Smt. Vandna Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 30-10-2018 at 10.00 A.M. failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.

Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 28th day of September, 2018.

Seal.

Sd/-

(CHHAVI NANTA) HAS,

Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Arki, District Solan, H. P.

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है