राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित बुधवार, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941
हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 29th June, 2019
No. TPT-C(9)-8/2002.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 41 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (No. 59 of 1988) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf is pleased to allot/release registration marks/number 72-राजपत्र/2019-03-07-2019 (3129)3130 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 from Serial No. 0001 to 9999 under the Registration marks HP-15-E to Registering and Licensing Authority, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan, Himachal Pradesh for registration of motor vehicles with effect from the publication in the H. P. Rajpatra (Extra Ordinary) in the public interest.
By order,
JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA, Principal Secretary (Transport).
_________
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 13th June, 2019
No. TPT-C (9)-8/2002.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 41 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (No. 59 of 1988) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf is pleased to allot/release registration marks/number from Serial No. 0001 to 9999 under the Registration marks HP-64-C to Regional Transport Officer, Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh for registration of motor vehicles with effect from the publication in the H. P. Rajpatra (Extra Ordinary) in the public interest.
By order,
JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA, Principal Secretary (Transport).
_________
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
NOTIFICATION
Shimla-2, the 4th June, 2019
No. TPT-C (9)-10/2002.—The Governor, Himachal Pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of Section 41 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (No. 59 of 1988) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf is pleased to allot/release registration marks/number from Serial No. 0001 to 9999 under the Registration marks HP-89-A to Registering & Licensing Authority Jhanduta, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh for registration of motor vehicles with effect from the publication in the H. P. Rajpatra (Extra Ordinary) in the public interest.
By order,
JAGDISH CHANDER SHARMA, Principal Secretary (Transport).
3131 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941 HIMACHAL PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SHIMLANOTIFICATION
Shimla, the 29th June, 2019
No. HPERC-H(1)25.—The Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (zp) of sub-section (2) of Section 181, of the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) and all other enabling powers it in this behalf, after previous publication, hereby makes the following regulations :—
REGULATIONS
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These regulations may be called the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Deviation Settlement Mechanism and Related Matters) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2019.
(2) These regulations shall come into force from 00.00 hrs of the first day of the week (i.e. Monday) starting immediately after the date of their publication in the Rajpatra, Himachal Pradesh.
2. Amendment of regulation 2.—In sub-regulation (1) of regulation 2 of the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Deviation Settlement Mechanism and Related Matters) Regulations, 2018 (hereinafter referred as "the said regulations").—
(i) after clause(d), the following new clause (da) shall be inserted, namely:—
"(da) 'Area Clearing Price (ACP)' means the price of a time block electricity contract established on the Power Exchange after considering all valid purchase and sale bids in particular area(s) after market splitting, i.e. dividing the market across constrained transmission corridor(s), as established by NLDC pursuant to Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Deviation Settlement Mechanism and Related Matters) Regulations, 2014 as amended from time to time;";
(ii) after clause(h), the following new clauses (ha) and (hb) shall be inserted, namely:—
"(ha) 'Daily Base DSM' means the sum of charges for deviations, as per Regulation 7, for all time blocks in a day payable or receivable as the case may be, excluding the additional charges under Regulation 9 and Regulation 9A;";
(hb) 'Day Ahead Market (DAM)' means a market where physical delivery of electricity occurs on the next day (T+1) of the date of transaction (T) and is governed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Market) Regulations, 2010 (as amended from time to time), the Rules and Bye-Laws of the Power Exchanges as approved by the Central Commission;";
(iii) after clause (s) the following new clause (sa) shall be inserted, namely:—
"(sa) 'Simple Average Area Clearing Price (SAACP)' means the simple average area clearing price as discovered/computed on daily basis by the NLDC for the day ahead market segment of the Power Exchange in accordance with the provisions of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Deviation Settlement Mechanism and3132 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 Related Matters) Regulations, 2014 amended from time to time and thereafter posted by it on their website, which shall be automatically applicable for the purpose of these regulations also;"; and
(iv) after clause (y), the following new clauses (ya) shall be inserted, namely:—
"(ya) 'Time Block DSM' means the charge for deviation, as per Regulation 7, for the specific time block in a day payable or receivable as the case may be, excluding the additional charges under Regulation 9 and Regulation 9A;".
3. Amendment of regulation 5.—(I) in sub-regulation (C):—
(i) for the words, sign and figures "49.70 Hz", wherever appearing in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), the words ,sign and figures "49.85Hz" shall be substituted; and (ii) the proviso alongwith the Explanation thereunder shall be omitted;
(II) after sub-regulation (I), the following new sub-regulation (IA) shall be inserted, namely : —
"(IA) Additional Charges For Sustained Deviation : In addition to the charges/ additional charges as per regulations 7, 8 and 9, the State Entity shall also be liable to pay the additional charges, in case of violation of the requirements in relation to sustained deviations, as specified in regulation 9A." ; and
(III) in the third proviso to sub-regulation (L), for the words, signs and figures "824.04 Paise/kWh", wherever appearing in clauses (i) and (ii), the words, sign and figures "800 Paise/kWh" shall be substituted."
4. Amendment of regulation 7.—In sub-regulation (1) of the regulation 7 of said regulations:—
(i) for the words, sign and figure "specified in the Table-1 below", the words, sign and figure "specified in Table-1, read with the notes in the parenthesis and the proviso below the said Table," shall be substituted; and
(ii) for the figures contained in the "Table-1" titled "Frequency based Charges for Deviation", the following shall be substituted, namely :—
"Table-1
Frequency based Charges for Deviation
| Average Frequency of the time block (Hz) | Charges for Deviation (Paise/kWh) | |
| Below | Not Below | |
| 50.05 | 0.00 | |
| 50.05 | 50.04 | 1xP/5 |
| 50.04 | 50.03 | 2xP/5 |
| 50.03 | 50.02 | 3xP/5 |
| 50.02 | 50.01 | 4xP/5 |
| 50.01 | 50.00 | P |
| 50.00 | 49.99 | 50.00+15xP/16 |
| 49.99 | 49.98 | 100.00+14xP/16 |
| 49.98 | 49.97 | 150.00+13xP/16 |
| 49.97 | 49.96 | 200.00+12xP/16 |
| 49.96 | 49.95 | 250.00+11xP/16 |
| 49.95 | 49.94 | 300.00+10xP/16 |
| 49.94 | 49.93 | 350.00+9xP/16 |
| 49.93 | 49.92 | 400.00+8xP/16 |
| 49.92 | 49.91 | 450.00+7xP/16 |
| 49.91 | 49.90 | 500.00+6xP/16 |
| 49.90 | 49.89 | 550.00+5xP/16 |
| 49.89 | 49.88 | 600.00+4xP/16 |
| 49.88 | 49.87 | 650.00+3xP/16 |
| 49.87 | 49.86 | 700.00+2xP/16 |
| 49.86 | 49.85 | 750.00+1xP/16 |
| 49.85 | 800.00 |
Where P is the Daily Simple Average Area Clearing Price (SAACP) in paisa per kWh.
Notes:—
(i) The Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM) rate vector will have a dynamic slope determined by joining the identified price points at 50 Hz. (daily simple average ACP), frequency of 49.85 Hz (Rs. 8 per unit) and 50.05 Hz (zero) on a daily basis.
(ii) The maximum ceiling limit applicable for average Daily ACP discovered in the DAM segment of Power Exchange at 50.00 Hz shall be 800 Paise/kWh.
(iii) The formulae have been devised in a manner which ensure that the Charges for deviation for each 0.01 Hz step shall be equivalent to the Slope determined by joining the price at 'Not below 50.05 Hz' and 'identified price at 50.00 Hz' in the frequency range of 50.05-50.00 Hz, and to the Slope determined by joining the 'price identified at 50.00 Hz' and price at 'below 49.85 Hz' in frequency range 'below 50 Hz' to 'below 49.85 Hz'.
(iv) In case of non-availability of daily SAACP due to no-trade on a given day, daily SAACP of the last available day shall be considered for determining the DSM charges as per Table-1.
(v) Deviation price shall be rounded off to nearest two decimal places.
(vi) The State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC) shall declare the DSM rates, based on the rates discovered/computed by NLDC under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Deviation Settlement Mechanism and Related Matters) Regulations, 2014 and shall display all relevant information on its website :"
5. Amendment of regulation 8.—(I) in sub-regulation (1)—
for the words, sign and figures "49.70 Hz", the words, sign and figures "49.85Hz" shall be substituted; and3134 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 (II) in sub-regulation (2)— for the words, sign and figures "49.70 Hz" wherever appearing in the said sub- regulation and the proviso thereto, the words, sign and figures "49.85Hz" shall be substituted; and
6. Amendment of regulation 9.—(i) In the sub-regulation (1), for the words, sign and figures "49.70 Hz", the words, sign and figures "49.85 Hz" shall be substituted;
(ii) in the sub-regulation (2), for the words, sign and figures "when grid frequency is "50.10 Hz and above" at the rate of 178 paise per kWh." the words, sign and figures "when grid frequency is "50.10 Hz and above" at the rate of Deviation charges applicable for the frequency range of 50-50.01 Hz for that day as per the Table-1 under regulation 7." shall be substituted;
(i) in the sub-regulation (3),—
(a) for the words, sign and figures "49.70Hz" wherever appearing in said sub- regulation, the words, sign and figures "49.85Hz" shall be substituted; and (b) for the words, sign and figures "824.04 Paise/kWh" the words, sign and figures "800 Paise/kWh" shall be substituted.
7. Insertion of regulation 9A.—After the regulation 9 of the said Regulations, the following regulation 9A shall be inserted, namely:—
"9A. Additional Charges for not meeting the requirements for Change in sign of
deviations.—
"In the event of sustained deviation from schedule in one direction (positive or negative) by any State Entity (buyer or seller), such entity shall correct its position in the manner as specified in following clauses (a) and (b) of this Regulation.
(a) on or before 31-03-2020, if the sustained deviation from schedule continues for 12 time blocks, the State Entity (buyer or seller), shall correct its position either by changing the sign of its deviation from schedule or by restricting the sustained deviation to the permissible limits as specified in Table-3 below with reference to its schedule for the time block to be reckoned for violation, at least once, latest by13th time block.
Table-3
Maximum permissible limits for Sustained Deviation from Schedule
| Sl. No. | Schedule for relevant time block to be reckoned for violation | Maximum permissible limits (in one direction of sustained deviation) in MW |
| 1. | Up to 10 MW | 0.5 |
| 2. | Upto 25MW | 1.0 |
| 3. | Upto 100MW | 2.00 |
| 4. | Above 100 MW | 10.00 |
Provided that each violation of the requirement under this clause shall attract an additional charge of 10% on the time block DSM payable/receivable as the case may be;
(b) on or after 01-04-2020, if the sustained deviation from schedule continues for 6 time blocks, the State Entity (buyer or seller), shall correct its position, either by changing the sign of its deviation from schedule or by restricting the sustained deviation to the permissible limits as specified in Table-3 above with reference to its schedule for the time block to be reckoned for violation, at least once, latest by 7th time block:
Provided that violation of the requirement under this clause shall attract an additional charge as specified in the table-4 below:
Table-4
Additional Charge for Violation in Sustained Deviation from Schedule :
| No. of Violation in a Day | Additional Change Payable |
| From first to fifth violation | For each violation, an additional charge @ 3% of daily base DSM payable/receivable. |
| From sixth to tenth violation | For each violation, an additional charge @ 5% of daily base DSM payable/receivable. |
| From eleventh violation onwards | For each violation, an additional charge @ 10% of daily base DSM payable/receivable. |
Provided further that counting of number of sign change violations under clauses (a) & (b) of this Regulation shall start afresh at 00.00 Hrs. for each day:
Provided further also that payment of additional charge for failure to adhere to sign change requirement as specified under clauses (a) & (b) of this regulation shall not be applicable to—
(i) any infirm injection of power by a generating station prior to CoD of a unit during testing and commissioning activities, in accordance with the Connectivity Regulations; and
(ii) any drawal of power by a generating station for the start-up activities of a unit.
Explanation.—For the purpose of this Regulation, sustained deviation means continuous deviation outside the maximum permissible limit as specified in Table-3 above, such range being a subset of the volume limit as specified in sub-regulations (1) and (2) of regulation 8. In other words, if the deviation is brought within the range as specified in Table-3 or it remains within the range specified in Table-3, it will not be considered as sustained deviation, even if the change in sign of deviation has not taken place.
Illustrations:—
(i) Illustration to clause (a) of this regulation.—A State Entity having a sustained deviation from time blocks t1 to t12, should correct its position either by changing the sign of its deviation (from positive to negative or negative to positive as the case may be) or come back in the permissible limits as specified in Table-3 above with reference to its schedule latest in the end of time block t13. In case, such sign change does not3136 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 take place or it fails to come back in the range as specified in Table-3 above in the end of time block t13, but such correction of position takes place from time block t14 up to time block t24, then the additional charge shall be levied equivalent to one violation. The above violation shall attract an additional charge at the rate of 10% of the time block DSM for t13. Further, in case, sign change does not take place or it fails to come back to the range as aforesaid even latest in the end of t25, but correction of position takes place from time block t26 up to time block t36, then the additional charge shall be levied equivalent to two violations. The above violation shall attract an additional charge at the rate of 10% of the time block DSM for t13 & t25, and so on.
(ii) Illustration to clause (b) of this regulation.—On or after 01-04-2020, if a State Entity having a sustained deviation from time blocks t1 to t7, should correct its position either by changing the sign of its deviation (from positive to negative or negative to positive as the case may be) or come back in the range as specified in Table-3 above with reference to its schedule latest in the end of time block t7. In case, such sign change does not take place or it fails to come back in the aforesaid range in the end of time block t7, but such correction of position takes place from time block t8 up to time block t12, then additional charge shall be levied equivalent to one violation. Further, in case, sign change does not take place or it fails to come back in the range as aforesaid latest in the end of t13, but correction in position takes place from time block t14 up to time block t18, then the additional charge shall be levied for two violations and so on.
The additional charge shall be at the rate as specified in Table-4 above of this Regulation.
(iii) In case the State Entity effects change in the sign of its deviation from the schedule, or otherwise restricts the deviation to the permissible limit as per Table-3, before the expiry of latest time block in which it was required to do so, the violations, if any, for the remaining period of the day shall be counted with reference to the time block in which it has actually complied the said requirement prior to the expiry of that time block.
(iv) The additional charge as per this regulation shall be computed on the sum total of the mode values (i.e. by ignoring the sign) of the amount payable and receivable for that day under regulation 7.".
8. Amendment of regulation 10.—(i) For sub-regulation (1), the following shall be substituted, namely:—
"(1) Charges for Deviation under regulation 7 and the additional charges for Deviation under sub-regulations (1), (2) and (3) of regulation 9 and those under regulation 9A shall be levied without prejudice to any action that may be considered appropriate by the Commission under Section 142 of the Act for contravention of the provisions of these Regulations .";
(ii) in sub-regulation (3), for the words, sign and figures "when grid frequency was "49.70Hz and above" and "below 49.70 Hz" separately.", the following shall be substituted, namely :—
"when grid frequency was "49.85Hz and above" and "below 49.85 Hz" separately. The SLDC shall also upload the details of DSM account and the status of amounts received/paid as well as the interest payable/ receivable against each bill on regular basis.";
3137 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 19419. Amendment of regulation 12.—For clause (ii) of sub-regulation (1), the following shall be substituted, namely :—
"in case for any day, the amount payable by various State Entities separately on account of charges under regulation 7 or regulation 9 or regulation 9A falls short of the total amount payable for that day for the State as a whole on account of the corresponding charges under the respective regulations as per the bill(s) raised by NRLDC/NRPC, the amount(s) payable, for that day, by the concerned State Entity(ies) against such charges under respective regulations shall be increased proportionately (i.e. in proportion to the sum total of the mode values of the amount payable and receivable separately under each of the said regulation) so as to cover up such shortfall for that day fully separately in respect of each of such charges;"
Explanation.—The proportionate increase on these lines shall be carried out on daily basis only i.e. separately for each day and separately for the charges under each of the said regulation, even though the bills are otherwise to be raised on weekly basis;".
10. Amendment of regulation 14.—(i) In sub-regulation (2)–
(a) for the words, sign and figures "two days, i.e., beyond Nine (9) days", the words, sign and figures "one day, i.e., beyond Eight (8) days" shall be substituted;
(b) for the sign ".", the sign ":" shall be substituted and immediately thereafter the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :—
"Provided that in case of delay in payment of any weekly bill beyond 24 days from the date of issue of bill by SLDC, the simple interest payable by the defaulting State Entity shall be @0.08% for each day of delay beyond the said period of 24 days.
(ii) in clause (i) of the proviso under sub-regulation (3), for the words and figures "beyond 9 days", the words, sign and figures "beyond 8 days" shall be substituted;
(iii) in sub-regulation (6), for the words, figures "9 days", the words, figures "8 days" shall be substituted.
(iv) after sub-regulation (6), the following sub-regulation (7) shall be inserted, namely:—
"(7) In case a State Entity defaults in making payment of a weekly bill, whether directly or through LC, by more than 30 days beyond the due date, the HPSLDC, in order to recover the dues, may, apart from invoking the provisions made elsewhere in these regulations, also suitably curtail the schedule for the defaulting State Entity, by way of withholding NOC/concurrence or any other appropriate means, after giving a notice of 30 days to such defaulting State Entity and may also continue such curtailment till the entire updated outstanding amount, including interest also, is paid by that defaulting State Entity and the requisite letter of credit, as per the requirement of sub-regulation (5) of this regulation is also opened and made operative."
By order of the Commission Sd/- Secretary.
3138 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941In the Court of Shri Raman Gharsanghi (H.A.S.), Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
Sh. Kamal s/o Sh. Dhani Ram, r/o & V. P.O. Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P.
and
Geeta d/o Sh. Kishan, r/o Village Chowki Dobhi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. at present residing at VPO Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—An application for registration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Sh. Kamal s/o Sh. Dhani Ram, r/o & V. P.O. Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P. and Geeta d/o Sh. Kishan, r/o Village Chowki Dobhi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. at present residing at VPO Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P. has presented an application on 10-06-2019 in this court for the registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954. Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of general public that if any person have any objection for the registration of marriage can appear in this court on 10-07-2019 at Manali to object registration of above marriage personally or through an authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 15th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
RAMAN GHARSANGHI (HAS), Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
In the Court of Shri Raman Gharsanghi (H.A.S.), Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
In the matter of :
Sh. Akshay s/o Sh. Dhani Ram, r/o & V. P.O. Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P.
and
Priti d/o Sh. Kishan, r/o Village Chowki Dobhi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. at present residing at VPO Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P.
Versus
General Public
Subject.—An application for registration of Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954.
3139 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941Sh. Akshay s/o Sh. Dhani Ram, r/o & V. P.O. Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P. and Priti d/o Sh. Kishan, r/o Village Chowki Dobhi, Tehsil and District Kullu, H.P. at present residing at VPO Patlikuhal, Tehsil Manali, Distt. Kullu, H. P. has presented an application on 10-06-2019 in this court for the registration of marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954. Hence this proclamation is hereby issued for the information of general public that if any person have any objection for the registration of marriage can appear in this court on 10-07-2019 at Manali to object registration of above marriage personally or through an authorized agent failing which this marriage will be registered under this Act, 1954 accordingly.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 15th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
RAMAN GHARSANGHI (HAS), Special Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
____________
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 58/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 29-05-2019 तारीख पेशी : 12-07-2019 वादी वीरेन्द्र कुमार, दिनेश कुमार पुत्रगण जसवा देवी पुत्री श्री जै देव, अजय कुमार पुत्र व श्री राजेन्द्र पाल, निवासी नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश . . वादी।
बनाम
नन्द लाल पुत्र नरायण पुत्र श्री हरी राम, निवासी सुहडा, मुहला नगर मण्डी, हि0 प्र0 . . प्रतिवादी। प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 37 ता 39 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954.
वादी वीरेन्द्र कुमार, दिनेश कुमार पुत्रगण जसवा देवी पुत्री श्री जै देव, अजय कुमार पुत्र व श्री राजेन्द्र पाल, निवासी नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र दायर किया है कि भूमि खाता/खतौनी नं0 143 मिन/198 मिन, खसरा नं0 1426 व खसरा नं0 1419, कित्ता 2, रकबा तादादी 10-48 वर्ग मीटर स्थित महाल सुहडा/366/6 जिसके वह मालिक है के खाना काश्त में उक्त प्रतिवादीगण अर्थात् नन्द लाल पुत्र नरायण पुत्र श्री हरी राम, निवासी सुहडा, मुहला सुहडा में किरायेदार दर्ज कागजात माल चला आ रहा है जबकि वह काफी अरसा पहले यह दुकान छोड़ चुका है के बजाये कब्जा काश्त स्वयं मालिक दर्ज किया जाये। क्योंकि इस नम्बर खसरा पर बनी दुकान पर मालिक का ही कब्जा है क्योंकि प्रतिवादीगण का कोई भी स्थाई पता नहीं है जिस वजह उसको साधारण तल्बी होना असम्भव है। अतः इस इश्तहार समाचार पत्र/इश्तहार राजपत्र व मुस्त्री मुनादी द्वारा प्रतिवादी को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे उसे कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 27-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जाएगी।
आज दिनांक 11-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।
मोहर। प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।3140 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 62/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्रीमती सरला हाण्डा पत्नी श्री जितेन्द्र हाण्डा, निवासी मकान नं0 237/8 बंगला मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 37 ता 39 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती बारे।
श्रीमती सरला हाण्डा पत्नी श्री जितेन्द्र हाण्डा, निवासी मकान नं0 237/8 बंगला मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया है कि उनका सही नाम सरला हाण्डा है लेकिन मेरे पुत्र यश हाण्डा के जन्म रिकार्ड नगर परिषद् मण्डी में मेरा घरेलू नाम कंचन लिखा गया है। यह दोनों नाम एक ही व्यक्ति के हैं। अतः मेरे नाम की दुरुस्ती कंचन उपनाम सरला हाण्डा किया जाये।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो दिनांक 27-07-2019 को वह असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जाएगी।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 55/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 13-05-2019 तारीख पेशी : 12-07-2019 वादी हरबंस कुमार पुत्र राम लाल पुत्र नानक चन्द, निवासी मकान नं0 128/7 नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
. . वादी।
बनाम
राजीव, राकेश पुत्रगण व श्रीमती सलोचना पत्नी स्व0 श्री दिना नाथ पुत्र देवकी नन्दन श्रीमती रमा जैदेई, रजनी जैदेई पुत्रियां व पदमा देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री देवकी नन्दन, मीना देवी पुत्री श्रीमती निरूपमा पुत्री ..प्रतिवादीगण। देवकी नन्दन, निवासी समखेतर नगर, मण्डी, हि0 प्र0
प्रार्थना पत्र जेर धारा 37 ता 39 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954.
3141 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941वादी हरबंस कुमार पुत्र राम लाल पुत्र नानक चन्द, निवासी मकान नं0 128/1 नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र दायर किया है कि भूमि खाता/खतौनी नं0 194/329, खसरा नं0 1464, रकबा तादादी 19-35 वर्ग मीटर स्थित महाल समखेतर/ 366/3 जिसके वह मालिक है के खाना काश्त में उक्त प्रतिवादीगण अर्थात् राजीव, राकेश पुत्रगण व श्रीमती सलोचना पत्नी स्व0 श्री दिना नाथ पुत्र देवकी नन्दन, श्रीमती रमा देवी, जैदेई, रजनी जैदेई पुत्रियां व पदमा देवी पत्नी स्व0 श्री देवकी नन्दन, मीना देवी पुत्री श्रीमती निरूपमा पुत्री देवकी नन्दन, निवासी समखेतर नगर, मण्डी, हि0 प्र0 गलत दर्ज कागजात माल हुये हैं के बजाये कब्जा काश्त मालिक स्वयं दर्ज किया जाये। क्योंकि इस नम्बर खसरा पर मकान बना है जिस पर वादी अर्थात् मालिक का ही कब्जा चला आ रहा है क्योंकि प्रतिवादीगण का कोई भी स्थाई पता नहीं है जिस वजह उनको साधारण तल्बी होना असम्भव है। अतः इस इश्तहार समाचार पत्र/इश्तहार राजपत्र व मुस्त्री मुनादी द्वारा प्रतिवादीगण को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे उन्हेें कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो दिनांक 12-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकते हैं। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जाएगी।
आज दिनांक 11-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 65/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्री ज्वाला राम भारती पुत्र स्व0 श्री धर्म चन्द भारती, निवासी मकान नं0 414/5 सैण मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 37 ता 39 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती बारे।
श्री ज्वाला राम भारती पुत्र स्व0 श्री धर्म चन्द भारती, निवासी मकान नं0 414/5 सैण मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया है कि उसके पिता का सही नाम श्री धर्म चन्द भारती है लेकिन राजस्व रिकार्ड महाल सैण/366/1 में वाल भारती दर्ज है। यह दोनों नाम एक ही व्यक्ति के हैं। अतः मेरे पिता का नाम राजस्व रिकार्ड महाल सैण/366/1 में वाल भारती उपनाम धर्म चन्द भारती दर्ज किया जाये।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो दिनांक 27-07-2019 को वह असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जाएगी।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।3142 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 61/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्री विजय कुमार पुत्र श्री मान चन्द, निवासी खडौठ, डा0 बल्लाह, तहसील पालमपुर, जिला कांगड़ा, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 37 ता 39 भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 बाबत नाम दुरुस्ती बारे।
श्री विजय कुमार पुत्र श्री मान चन्द, निवासी खडौठ, डा0 बल्लाह, तहसील पालमपुर, जिला कांगड़ा, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र पेश किया है कि उसके पुत्र का सही नाम रक्षित रनोट है लेकिन जन्म रिकार्ड में नगर परिषद् मण्डी में उसका नाम रक्षित अरनोट लिखा दिया है जोकि गलत है। अतः उसके नाम की दुरुस्ती रक्षित अरनोट के बजाये रक्षित रनोट किया जाये।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो दिनांक 27-07-2019 को वह असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् कोई आपत्ति प्राप्त न होने पर एक पक्षीय कार्यवाही की जाएगी।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान,
सहायक समाहर्ता वर्ग-2,
सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 59/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्रीमती यादवा देवी पुत्री श्री देवी सिंह, निवासी बासाधार, डा0 टाण्डु, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीेरण अधिनियम, 1969.
श्रीमती यादवा देवी पुत्री श्री देवी सिंह, निवासी बासाधार, डा0 टाण्डु, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उसका जन्म दिनांक 27-05-1977 को घर पर हुआ है परन्तु किन्हीं कारणवश उसके माता-पिता उसके जन्म को ग्राम पंचायत टाण्डु के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं करवा पाये हैं जिसे दर्ज किया जाये।3143 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941 अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई एतराज हो तो दिनांक 27-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् किसी आपत्ति पर विचार नहीं किया जायेगा।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर। प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 66/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 नीलम पुत्री स्व0 कमला देवी व सनी कुमार पुत्र स्व0 कमला देवी, निवासी गांव व डा0 नसलोह, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीेरण अधिनियम, 1969.
नीलम पुत्री स्व0 कमला देवी व सनी कुमार पुत्र स्व0 कमला देवी, निवासी गांव डा0 नसलोह, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उनका जन्म क्रमशः दिनांक 02-08-1993 व 30-08-1998 को घर पर हुआ है परन्तु किन्हीं कारणवश उसके माता-पिता उनके जन्म को ग्राम पंचायत नसलोह के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं करवा पाये हैं जिसे दर्ज किया जाये।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई एतराज हो तो दिनांक 27-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् किसी आपत्ति पर विचार नहीं किया जायेगा।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर। प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं तहसीलदार, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत श्री प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 57/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 25-05-2019 तारीख पेशी : 12-07-2019 सुखविन्द्र सिंह पुत्र श्री दर्शन सिंह, निवासी मकान नं0 144/12 राम नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।3144 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 बनाम
आम जनता
प्रार्थना-पत्र जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीेरण अधिनियम, 1969.
सुखविन्द्र सिंह पुत्र श्री दर्शन सिंह, निवासी मकान नं0 144/12 राम नगर मण्डी, तहसील सदर, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ-पत्र सहित मुकद्दमा दायर किया है कि उनके पोते आशा सिंह पुत्र अमन दीप सिंह की मृत्यु दिनांक 03-01-2016 को घर पर हुई थी परन्तु किन्हीं कारणवश हम उसकी मृत्यु को नगर परिषद् मण्डी के रिकार्ड में दर्ज नहीं करवा पाये हैं जिसे दर्ज किया जाये।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई एतराज हो तो दिनांक 12-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् किसी आपत्ति पर विचार नहीं किया जायेगा।
आज दिनांक 12-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 60/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्री दिशान्त शर्मा पुत्र स्व0 श्री अशोक शर्मा, निवासी मकान नं0 141/13 पड्डल मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर, मण्डी व सुनीला भारद्वाज पुत्री श्री नागेन्द्र चन्द, निवासी गांव घडसी ब्राह्मणा, डा0 घडसी, तहसील कसौली, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
श्री दिशान्त शर्मा पुत्र स्व0 श्री अशोक शर्मा, निवासी मकान नं0 141/13 पड्डल मुहला मण्डी शहर, तहसील सदर मण्डी व सुनीला भारद्वाज पुत्री श्री नागेन्द्र चन्द, निवासी गांव घडसी ब्राह्मणा, डा0 घडसी, तहसील कसौली, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पत्र सहित प्रस्तुत किया है कि उसकी शादी दिनांक 22-09-2018 को हिन्दु रीति रिवाज अनुसार हुई है परन्तु अज्ञानतावश वह अपनी शादी को नगर परिषद् मण्डी, तहसील सदर मण्डी में समय पर दर्ज नहीं कर सके। जिसे वह दर्ज करना चाहता हैं।
अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 27-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् किसी आपत्ति पर विचार नहीं किया जायेगा।3145 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941 आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
ब अदालत कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश
मिसल नं0 : 64/2019 तारीख मजरूआ : 10-06-2019 तारीख पेशी : 27-07-2019 श्री दीपक कटोच पुत्र स्व0 श्री सुरज सिंह कटोच, निवासी पन्जैहटी, डा0 तल्याहड, तहसील सदर, मण्डी व प्रोमिला कटोच पुत्री श्री केहर सिंह, निवासी गांव अरठी, डा0 भंगरोटु, तहसील बल्ह, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
बनाम
आम जनता
श्री दीपक कटोच पुत्र स्व0 श्री सुरज सिंह कटोच, निवासी पन्जैहटी, डा0 तल्याहड, तहसील सदर, मण्डी व प्रोमिला कटोच पुत्री श्री केहर सिंह, निवासी गांव अरठी, डा0 भंगरोटु, तहसील बल्ह, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश ने इस अदालत में प्रार्थना-पत्र मय शपथ पत्र सहित प्रस्तुत किया है कि उसकी शादी दिनांक 30-11-2001 को हिन्दु रीति रिवाज अनुसार हुई है परन्तु अज्ञानतावश वह अपनी शादी को नगर परिषद् मण्डी, तहसील सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी में समय पर दर्ज नहीं करवा सका। जिसे वह दर्ज करना चाहता है। अतः सर्वसाधारण को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि इस बारे किसी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर/तराज हो तो वह दिनांक 27-07-2019 को असालतन या वकालतन प्रातः 11.00 बजे हाजिर होकर अपना उजर/एतराज लिखित या मौखिक पेश कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि के पश्चात् किसी आपत्ति पर विचार नहीं किया जायेगा।
आज दिनांक 10-06-2019 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ। मोहर।
प्रेम लाल धीमान, कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, सदर मण्डी, जिला मण्डी, हिमाचल प्रदेश।
--------
Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Arki, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 12/2019
20-06-2019 Pending for 23-07-2019 Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under section 13(3) of the Birth and Death
Registration Act, 1969.
3146 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has filed a case under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that his son namely Sh. Asheesh Kumar born on 27-04-2005 at Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, but his birth has not been entered in the records of Gram Panchayat Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. as per Certificate No.-10 issued by the Registrar, Birth and Death Registration, GP Dhundan, Tehsil Arki.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Sh. Asheesh Kumar s/o Sh. Bishan Dass & Smt. Vidya Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 23-07-2019 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.
Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 20th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
Sd/-
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Arki, District Solan, H. P.
___________
Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Arki, District Solan, H. P.
Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 13/2019
20-06-2019 Pending for 23-07-2019 Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under section 13(3) of the Birth and Death
Registration Act, 1969.
Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has filed a case under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that her daughter namely Anjali born on 08-01-2003 at Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, but her birth has not been entered in the records of Gram Panchayat Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. as per Certificate No.-10 issued by the Registrar, Birth and Death Registration, GP Dhundan, Tehsil Arki.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Anjali d/o Sh. Bishan Dass & Smt. Vidya Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 23-07-2019 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.
Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 20th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
Sd/-
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Arki, District Solan, H. P.
3147 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941 Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Arki, District Solan, H. P.Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 14/2019
20-06-2019 Pending for 23-07-2019 Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under section 13(3) of the Birth and Death
Registration Act, 1969.
Shri Bishan Dass s/o Shri Sunder Lal, r/o Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has filed a case under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that his son namely Sourabh Kumar born on 28-09-1999 at Village Aer, P.O. Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, but her birth has not been entered in the records of Gram Panchayat Dhundan, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. as per Certificate No.- 10 issued by the Registrar, Birth and Death Registration, GP Dhundan, Tehsil Arki.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection for the registration of delayed date of birth of Sourabh Kumar s/o Sh. Bishan Dass & Smt. Vidya Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 23-07-2019 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.
Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 20th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
Sd/-
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Arki, District Solan, H. P.
___________
Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Arki, District Solan, H. P.
Date of Decision Case No. Date of Institution 11/2019
14-06-2019 16-07-2019 Shri Ram Krishan s/o Shri Surat Ram, r/o Village Balang, P.O. Balera, Tehsil Arki, District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh
Versus
General Public
. .Respondent.
Regarding delayed registration of Birth event under section 13(3) of the Birth and Death
Registration Act, 1969.
Shri Ram Krishan s/o Shri Surat Ram, r/o Village Balang, P.O. Balera, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has filed a case under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that his mother namely Late3148 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941 Smt. Phulla Devi died on 15-03-2012 at Village Balang, P.O. Balera, Tehsil Arki, but her death has not been entered in the records of Gram Panchayat Balera, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. as per Certificate No.-10 issued by the Registrar, Birth and Death Registration, GP Dhundan, Tehsil Arki.
Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection for the registration of delayed death of Late Smt. Phulla Devi w/o Sh. Surat Ram, may submit their objections in writing in this office on or before 16-07-2019 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date of hearing.
Given under my hand and seal of this office on this 14th day of June, 2019.
Seal.
Sd/-
Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Arki, District Solan, H. P.
___________
In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the
powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2019 Date of Instt. : 10-05-2019 Pending for : 14-07-2019 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Shubham Kumar s/o Shri Baldev Thakur, r/o Village and P.O. Barotiwala, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan (H.P.) and Smt. Manju Verma d/o Shri Sant Ram, r/o Village Gainti, Tehsil Kandaghat, District Solan (H.P.) presently w/o Shri Shubham Kumar has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 03-03-2019.
And, whereas, both these applicants have submitted in their applications and in their affidavits that both were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage, and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in General is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 14-07-2019 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 14-07-2019, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 12-06-2019.
Seal.
Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
3149 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़, 1941In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the
powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2019 Date of Instt. : 12-06-2019 Pending for : 13-07-2019 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Santokh Singh s/o Shri Karnel Singh, r/o Village Khera Nihala, P.O. Khera, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) and Smt. Ramandeep Kaur d/o Shri Avtar Singh, r/o Village Simarnjeet Singh Nagar, Gali No. 3, Karamsar Colony Ludhiana, Punjab and presently w/o Shri Santokh Singh has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 14-10-2018.
And, whereas, both these applicants have submitted in their applications and in their affidavits that Shri Santokh Singh was unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage, and Smt. Raman deep Kaur was widow at the time of marriage, and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in General is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 13-07-2019 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 13-07-2019, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 12-06-2019.
Seal.
Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum- SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
____________
In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) exercising the
powers of Marriage Officer under Special Marriage Act, 1954
Case No. : ..../ 2019 Date of Instt. : 08-05-2018 Pending for : 13-07-2019 Notice u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 inviting the objections of the General Public for registration of marriage.
Notice to the General Public.
Whereas, Shri Vipin Kumar s/o Shri Kashmir, r/o Village Kirpalpur, P.O. and Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) and Smt. Sukanya d/o Shri Rajender Kumar presently w/o Shri Vipin Kumar s/o Shri Kashmir, r/o Village Kirpalpur, P.O. and Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) has moved an application u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for registration of their marriage that was solemnized on 19-11-2014;
3150 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 03 जुलाई, 2019/12 आषाढ़ 1941And, whereas, both these applicants have submitted in their applications and in their affidavits that both were unmarried at the time of solemnization of their marriage, and were major in age and having no prohibited relations to each other debarring them to marry each other. Both the applicants have requested for registration of their marriage.
Therefore, by this notice the public in General is informed that if any one has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, he may present before this court on or before 13-07-2019 for hearing of objections if any. In case no objection is received by dated 13-07-2019, it will be presumed that there is no objection to the registration of the above said marriage and the same will be registered on the said date.
Given under my hand and seal of the court on 12-06-2019.
Seal.
Sd/- Marriage Officer-cum-SDM,
Nalagarh, District Solan, H. P.
नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम् ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है