Servants of Knowledge
Himachal Pradesh Gazette · Government of Himachal Pradesh

Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 171, 10 November 2022

Published 10 November 2022

Gazette no.
171
Gazetteid
171/GAZETTE/2022-10/11/2022
Identifier
in.gazette.himachal.2022-11-10.171_gazette_2022-10_11_2022
Languages
English, Hindi
Published at
Original source ↗

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित वीरवार, 10 नवम्बर, 2022/19 कार्तिक 1944

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

राजस्व विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-02, 14 अक्तूबर, 2022

संख्याः राजस्व-डी(एफ)4-11/2019-लूज-(मण्डी).--हिमाचल प्रदेश भू-अभिलेख नियमावली, 1992 के पैरा 3.18 में वर्णित/निर्दिष्ट प्रावधानों/मानकों में छूट देते हुए राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, जिला मंडी की 171—राजपत्र/2022-10-11-2022 (7425) 7426 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 करसोग तहसील के अन्तर्गत सात (7) नये पटवार वृा मण्डप नामतः मतेहल, सनारली, मनोला, काण्डी-III, भलेरा, नवींधार (बाग) व कुठेहड़ का अनुलग्नक-'क' में दिए गए विवरण अनुसार खोलने/सृजन करने का सहर्ष आदेश देते हैं। इन पटवार वृाों हेतु सात (7) पद पटवारी वेतनमान मु0 20,200-64,000/-(Level-3), मांग संख्याः 5, मुख्यशीर्ष-2029-00-103-04 (गैर-योजना) एवं 7 पद अंशकालिक कार्यकर्ता (part time worker) के सृजन की भी स्वीकृति प्रदान की जाती है।

आदेश द्वारा, हस्ताक्षरित/- (ओंकार चन्द शर्मा) प्रधान सचिव एवं वित्तायुक्त (राजस्व)।

--------

अनुलग्नंक-'क' (i) पटवार वृत्त लोअर करसोग के विभाजन उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त मतेहल की स्थिति :

राजस्व ग्राम नं0 हदबस्त न ं0 ख0 कुल रकबा रकबा मजरुआ माल खाता
मतेहल 358 1073 81 47 247 76
उपरला धरभाउग 367 31 2 1 4 7
धरभाउगा 368 124 15 11 39 13
ज ं गल डमेहल 369 39 105 4 8 3
जुडली 370 130 8 5 15 10
कलैहणी 356 1136 100 51 256 70
शिरगल 359 358 59 24 122 37
ज ं गल चलौहणी 357 1 11 11 0 1
ज गल कन्जोल ं 364 55 109 4 12 7
कुल योग. . 2947 490 158 703 224

(ii) पटवार वृत्त मतेहल बनने के उपरान्त पटवार वृत्त लोअर करसोग की स्थिति :

राजस्व ग्राम नं0 हदबस्त नं0 ख0 कुल रकबा रकबा मजरुआ माल खाता
बगैण 362 408 49 27 132 86
कोट 361 950 94 50 313 197
मझास 360 907 98 65 340 154
लोअर करसोग 417 1331 104 88 941 431
मसोग 355 248 30 19 134 55
चलारु 421 917 75 58 644 240
कुल योग . . 4761 450 307 2504 1163

(iii) पटवार वृत्त कजौण के विभाजन नये पटवार वृत्त भनेरा की स्थितिः

क्र. सं. नाम मुहालल हदबस्त नं0 कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नम्बरान खसरा विवरण
1. भनेरा 462 130 232 1349
2. कोटलू 463 44 67 471
3. चलोग 499 11 14 59
4. बगैण 500 80 153 1313
5. ज गल केलोधार सुरान्डा ं 501 1 1 4
कुल. . 266 467 3196

(iv) पटवार वृत्त भनेरा सृजित होने के उपरान्त पटवार वृत्त कजौण की स्थिति :

क्र. स ं . नाम मुहालल हदबस्त नं0 कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नम्बरान खसरा विवरण
1. ममेल 419 345 562 1163
2. बाग सलाणा 420 83 157 545
3. लोल 422 46 55 341
4. काओ 423 115 163 485
5. धलोग 464 38 77 348
6. ज गल महादेव बनौणी ं 465 1 3 4
7. सानणा 466 146 223 847
8. सुरसी 467 12 26 119
9. जंगल शिल्ह 468 35 53 317
कुल. . 821 1319 4169

(v) पटवार वृत्त भन्थल एवं अप्पर करसोग के विभाजन उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त सनारली की स्थिति :

भन्थल व अप्पर करसोग से विभाजित महाल न 0 ं हदबस्त न ं0 ख0 कुल रकबा रकबा मजरुआ माल खाता
पनचक्कर (भन्थल) 474 407 48 35 401 161
रिकी (भन्थल) 413 841 80 47 379 131
बथार (भन्थल) 480 506 268 20 97 49
बाहण गधीमण (भन्थल) 481 385 439 19 67 51
शिला गधीमण (भन्थल) 411 35 3 1 11 2
खनावडी (भन्थल) 412 230 20 11 101 32
सनारली (अप्पर करसोग) 415 1746 139 96 729 339
खनोरा (अप्पर करसोग) 414 841 78 48 324 141
जंगल टीकर करसोग (अप्पर करसोग) 410 345 418 20 61 37
कुल योग . . 5336 1493 297 2170 943

(vi) पटवार वृत्त सनारली सृजित होने के बाद पटवार वृत्त भन्थल की स्थिति :

राजस्व ग्राम नं0 हदबस्त न ं0 ख0 कुल रकबा रकबा मजरुआ माल खाता
न ै हरा 475 621 71 36 270 119
द ्रप्टी 476 302 26 15 129 48
भन्थल 479 1415 128 71 781 341
जंगल पहरन 486 38 139 3 15 3
पैहरन 485 110 12 5 38 13
गोथरा 478 264 26 11 96 39
पुनी 483 259 26 10 85 23
खडकन 477 577 45 20 183 49
पराली रैहली 482 61 8 3 10 16
भण्डारनू 473 787 72 45 415 240
जंगल दोफा 484 232 845 12 47 29
कुल योग. . 4666 1398 231 2069 920
7428 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

(vii) पटवार वृत्त सनारली सृजित होने के बाद पटवार वृत्त अप्पर करसोग की स्थिति :

राजस्व ग्राम नं0 हदबस्त नं0 ख0 कुल रकबा रकबा मजरुआ माल खाता
करसोग 416 1690 73 40 340 606
दछैण 380 775 61 35 198 84
नौवां 398 319 34 16 109 56
बरल 418 182 22 15 129 56
सरकोल 398 169 40 22 126 26
मझार 363 69 13 6 38 13
कुल योग. . 3204 243 134 940 841

(viii) पटवार वृत्त रियुंशी के विभाजन उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त मनोला की स्थिति :

क्र. सं. नाम मुहाल हदबस्त नं0 कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नम्बरान खसरा विवरण
1. खडौणी 243 25 26 76
2. जंगल करयाणी 244 1 2 2
3. कशमीर 245 61 100 481
4. ज ं गल कशमीर 248 1 1 1
5. मनोला 340 105 192 1188
6. जंगल चान्दो 341 1 2 5
7. खलोगडा 345 113 155 808
8. बताहली 346 37 62 261
9. धवास 371 33 43 275
कुल भाग 377 583 3097

(ix) पटवार वृत्त मनोला सृजित होने के उपरान्त पटवार वृत्त रियुंशी की स्थिति :

क्र. स . ं नाम मुहाल हदबस्त नं0 कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नम्बरान खसरा विवरण
1. जंगल कोट 168 1 3 5
2. कोट 169 22 41 163
3. पंजयात्री 170 18 26 33
4. ज ं गल कनेरी 224 5 7 17
5. भनोल 225 46 121 645
6. जंगल कोट बहल 226 1 2 2
7. झनोल 228 9 12 18
8. ज गल झनोल ं 228 1 2 3
9. ज गल नागडा ं 232 1 1 1
10. नागडा 233 39 47 808
11. कराडला 234 20 30 248
12. ज ं गल शडई 236 1 3 11
13. शडई 237 19 27 149
14. चाकरू 238 15 23 134
15. जंगल कटाहच 240 6 10 41
16. चिठा धारठू 241 5 13 26
17. चुराग 242 350 525 1908
18. कोटला 246 10 21 19
19. कटाहच 247 9 10 44
20. जंगल कराडल 235 3 4 8
21. जंगल कराडल 342 1 1 1
22. मरान्डी 343 68 113 1137
23. ज ं गल मरान्डी 344 54 104 1112
24. ज गल झाओ पराला ं 372 10 22 110
25. चार कुफरी 373 4 8 34
26. झाओग 374 10 18 24
728 1194 6701

(x) पटवार वृत्त मेहरान के उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त कान्डी-III की स्थिति :

Name of Muhalat Hadbast No. Total No. Khasra Total Khatauni Total Area Cultivated Area Total Maal Population
जंगल धारन्डा 334 2 2
जंगल कटाहच देहच 338 4 2 13 1 0
ज ं गल ठांगर 333 2 1 30 0
बलासो 335 199 32 41 29 283 138
ज ं गल ठांगर 337 28 10 45 3 28 31
बलासो 249 73 24 6 5 37 23
बहली 336 284 47 29 22 251 193
कान्ढी-III 339 1824 331 205 148 1594 1058
धार कान्ढलू 332 1693 192 112 74 837 552
9 4109 639 483 281 3031 1995

(x) पटवार वृत्त काण्डी-III के सृजित होने के उपरान्त पटवार वृत्त मेहरान की वास्तविक स्थिति :

Name of Muhalat Hadbast No. Total No. Khasra Total Khatauni Total Area Cultivated Area Total Maal Population
मैहरन 252 2801 354 223 126 1286 1075
जिंगल 251 649 47 54 27 276 147
कान्ढी-II 290 637 43 60 21 134 140
जंगल मैहरन 250 16 4 280 0 24 0
चमोली 291 63 10 7 3 34 35
5 4166 458 624 177 1754 1397

(xii) पटवार वृत्त महोग के विभान उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त नावींधार (बाग) की स्थिति :

क्रं. स . ं नाम मुहाल कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नाम्बरान खसरा कुल क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर) विवरण
1. बाग/587 89 172 1221 97
2. खैर/586 97 162 725 87
3. शकाहल/585 74 114 508 155
4. DPF जगोल/588 2 2 3 146
5. बखौहण/589 58 90 351 42
क ु ल 5 320 540 2808 527
7430 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

(xiii) पटवार वृत्त महोग के विभाजन उपरान्त नये पटवार वृत्त कुठैहड़ की स्थिति :

क्रं. सं. नाम मुहाल कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नाम्बरान खसरा कुल क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर) विवरण
1. कुठेहड़/579 77 187 932 54
2. काण्डा/580 34 78 345 78
3. DPF लोटला दोयम/578 21 48 198 434
4. DPF लोटला अब्बल/549 37 60 291 232
5. DPF गरजूब/548 11 16 68 135
6. रसोग दोयम/581 156 256 1116 145
कुल. . 6 336 645 2950 1078

(xiv) पटवार वृत्त नावींधार (बाग) तथा कुठेहड़ सृजित होने के बाद पटवार वृत्त महोग की स्थिति :

क्रं. सं. नाम मुहाल कुल खाताजात कुल खतौनी नाम्बरान खसरा कुल क्षेत्रफल (हैक्टेयर) विवरण
1. महोग/584 117 227 1210 100
2. बगून्द/583 157 260 1162 85
3. DPF बगून्द/582 3 13 18 59
4. DPF शगाव/576 20 37 155 576
कुल 4 297 537 2545 820

--------

राजस्व विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-02, 14 अक्तूबर, 2022

संख्याः राजस्व-डी(एफ)4-11/2019-लूज-(मण्डी).--हिमाचल प्रदेश भू-अभिलेख नियमावली, 1992 के पैरा 2.5 में वर्णित/निर्दिष्ट प्रावधानों/मानकों में छूट देते हुए राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश, तहसील बल्द्वाड़ा, जिला मंडी के अन्तर्गत वर्तमान कानूनगो वृा बल्द्वाड़ा, समैला एवं ठलवाण का विघटन/पुनर्गठन करते हुए एक नया कानूनगो वृा भाम्बला, अनुलग्नक-'क' में दिए गए विवरण अनुसार तुरंत प्रभाव से खोलने/सृजित करने का सहर्ष आदेश देते हैं।

राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश इस कानूनगो वृा हेतु एक पद कानूनगो वेतनमान मु0 29,700-94,100/-(Level-8), मांग संख्याः 5, मुख्य शीर्ष-2029-00-103-04 (गैर-योजना) तथा 1 पद अंशकालिक कार्यकर्ता (Part time worker) के सृजन की भी स्वीकृति प्रदान करते हैं।

आदेश द्वारा, डॉ0 रजनीश, प्रधान सचिव एवं वित्तायुक्त (राजस्व)।7431 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 अनुलग्नक-'क' कानूनगो वृा भाम्बला के सृजन उपरान्त तहसील बल्द्वाड़ा के क्षेत्रीय कानूनगो वृाों की स्थिति :-

Sl. No. Name of FK Circle Name of PC Total Muhalat Total No. Khasra Total Khata/Khatauni Total Area in Hect. Total Cultivated Total Maal Population
1. Baldwara Baldwara 6 6180 1293/1493 426.83 213.58 2549.42 3204
Jehmat 8 5881 973/1026 519.41 233.74 1985.25 1979
Nagrota 7 3533 712/837 368.34 129.36 1406.73 1729
Chowk 7 5121 614/757 375.93 192.13 757.00 1621
Dhanalag 7 4304 751/834 342.33 157.14 1017.50 1759
Total 35 25019 4343/4947 2032.84 925.95 7715.90 10292
5. Smaila Smaila 11 5691 1277/1416 388.63 238.91 3085.10 2744
Nagwani 9 6066 994/1124 730.43 238.44 2179.30 2618
Kot 7 5075 951/1048 389.32 209.73 2213.00 2274
Narola 5 4119 829/971 300.21 220.91 2127.63 1829
Kshmaila 6 4291 640/688 420.02 167.17 1197.07 1341
Matyara 7 3794 877/957 246.46 188.66 2062.29 1719
Total 45 29036 5568/6204 2475.07 1263.82 12864.39 12525
3. Bhambla Bhambla 6 7258 1454/1695 510.37 281.80 2998.02 3392
Tikkri 5 4826 978/1101 312.49 197.90 1984.86 2206
Khanot 6 4337 991/1136 295.60 238.42 3141.00 2586
Khudla 5 5250 979/1100 366.85 235.79 2939.20 2180
Kalther 5 4509 558/646 443.28 160.63 1485.73 1247
Total 5 27 26280 4960/5678 1928.59 1114.52 12548.81 11611
कुल योग 16 107 80335 14871/16829 6436.50 3304.31 33129.10 34428

---------

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th March, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sukhdev Raj s/o Shri Kishan Chand, r/o V.P.O. Basal (Khawara), Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Una, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub-section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

7432 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No. Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sukhdev Raj s/o Shri Kishan Chand, r/o V.P.O. Basal (Khawara), Tehsil & District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, compensation and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

__________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 7th October, 2021

No.: 11-1/11(Lab)ID/2021-Nurpur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sushil Kumar s/o Shri Baldev Raj, r/o V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and the State Head, GVK, EMRI, 108, Opposite TV Sanitorium, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services during November 2019.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sushil Kumar s/o Shri Baldev Raj, r/o V.P.O. Sadwan, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. during November 2019 by the State Head, GVK, EMRI, 108, Opposite TV Sanitorium, Dharampur, District Solan, H.P., without conducting domestic enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages,7433 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 21st March, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shubh Lata, w/o Shri Tilak Raj, r/o V.P.O. Bathu, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Swisskem Healthcare, V.P.O. Bela Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 14-09-2021.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Tahliwal Circle, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Shubh Lata, w/o Shri Tilak Raj, r/o V.P.O. Bathu, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/s Swisskem Healthcare, V.P.O. Bela Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 14-09-2021 (as alleged by workman) without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, compensation and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 27th May, 2022

No.:11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.— It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sikandar s/o Shri Swaran Singh, r/o V.P.O. Haripur, Tehsil Dehra, District7434 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 Kangra, H.P. and the Factory Manager/Employer, M/S Jindal Medicot Limited, V.P.O. Thathal, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. on the issue of his alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 26-08-2021.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Amb, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sikandar s/o Shri Swaran Singh, r/o V.P.O. Haripur, Tehsil Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. by the Factory Manager/Employer, M/s Jindal Medicot Limited, V.P.O. Thathal, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 26-08-2021 (as alleged by workman), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 26th August, 2021

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2021-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Som Dutt s/o Shri Lalu Ram, r/o Village Thatri, P.O. Khanayara, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. and the Occupier/Factory Manager, M/s Manuni Hydro Electric Project, Village Lunta, P.O. Khanyara, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of illegal termination from services vide letter dated 31-01-2021.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial7435 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Som Dutt s/o Shri Lalu Ram, r/o Village Thatri, P.O. Khanayara, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. vide letter dated 31-01-2021 by the Occupier/Factory Manager, M/s Manuni Hydro Electric Project, Village Lunta, P.O. Khanyara, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employers/management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 21st March, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Soma Devi w/o Late Shri Makhan Singh, r/o Village Khanpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Swisskem Healthcare, V.P.O. Bela Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 14- 09-2021.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Tahliwal Circle, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Soma Devi w/o Late Shri Makhan Singh, r/o Village Khanpur, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/S Swisskem Healthcare, V.P.O. Bela Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 14-09-2021 (as alleged by workman) without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, compensation and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/ management?"

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner.

7436 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 27th May, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sona Singh s/o Shri Ramanand Singh, r/o # 374, Verdman Mill, Chandigarh, Road, Ludhiana, Punjab and the Factory Manager/Employer, M/s Jindal Medicot Limited, V.P.O. Thathal, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. on the issue of his alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 12-07-2021.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Amb, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sona Singh s/o Shri Ramanand Singh, r/o # 374, Verdman Mill, Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana, Punjab by the Factory Manager/Employer, M/s Jindal Medicot Limited, V.P.O. Thathal, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 12-07-2021 (as alleged by workman), without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 24th February, 2021

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2021-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Soni Kumar s/o Shri Roshan Lal, r/o Village Jeer Bhal, P.O. Bassi, Tehsil & District Kangra, H. P. and the Proprietor, M/s New Prem Bus Service, V.P.O. Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services during March, 2020.

7437 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Soni Kumar s/o Shri Roshan Lal, r/o Village Jeer Bhal, P.O. Bassi, Tehsil & District Kangra, H. P. by the Proprietor, M/S New Prem Bus Service, V.P.O. Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra, H.P. during March, 2020 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 4th May, 2022

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2022-Dehra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi w/o Shri Mukesh Kumar r/o Village Sukhnal, P.O. & Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. and the Block Medical Officer-cum-Chairman, Executive Committee, Rogi Kalyan Samiti, Civil Hospital, Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of her alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 01-01-2022.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

7438 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi w/o Shri Mukesh Kumar r/o Village Sukhnal, P.O. & Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. by the Block Medical Officer-cum-Chairman, Executive Committee, Rogi Kalyan Samiti, Civil Hospital, Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 01-01-2022, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th May, 2022

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2022-Dehra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shakuntla Devi w/o Shri Gurvachan Singh r/o Village Rukwal Lahad, P.O. Ghalour, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. and the Block Medical Officer-cum-Chairman, Executive Committee, Rogi Kalyan Samiti, Civil Hospital, Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of her alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 01-01-2022.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section- 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:-

"Whether the termination of services of Smt. Shakuntla Devi w/o Shri Gurvachan Singh r/o Village Rukwal Lahad, P.O. Ghalour, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. by the Block Medical Officer-cum-Chairman, Executive Committee, Rogi Kalyan Samiti, Civil Hospital, Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. w.e.f. 01-01-2022, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

7439 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th May, 2022

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2022-Dehra.— It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Shashi Kant s/o Shri Desh Raj, r/o V.P.O. Hasal Chokath, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. and the Principal, D.A.V. Public Senior Secondary School, V.P.O. Bhadoli, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of his alleged illegal termination from services during November, 2020.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Shashi Kant s/o Shri Desh Raj, r/o V.P.O. Hasal Chokath, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. by the Principal, D.A.V. Public Senior Secondary School, V.P.O. Bhadoli, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. during November, 2020, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner,

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th May, 2022

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2021-Chamba.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sher Singh s/o Shri Baija Ram, r/o Village Makalwani, P.O. Tikrigarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. and the Managing Director, I.A. Energy, 36MW, Power Project Chanju-I, Kathwar, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. on the issue of his alleged verbal termination from services w.e.f. 01-04-2017.

As per the report under Section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., he tried his level best7440 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Sher Singh s/o Shri Baija Ram, r/o Village Makalwani, P.O. Tikrigarh, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 01-04-2017 by the Managing Director, I.A. Energy, 36MW, Power Project Chanju-I, Kathwar, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/-

Deputy Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th March, 2021

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2021-Una.—An industrial dispute has been raised by the group of workmen S/Shri Satish Kumar, Karnail Singh, Dharam Singh, and Jagvinder Singh through their authorized representative Shri Rakesh Sharma, State President (BMS) & Member of EPF State HP, HQ Ward No. 9, Near Geeta Bhawan, Municipal Committee, Santokhgarh, District Una, H.P. u/s 2-K and 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between the group of workmen and (i) the Managing Director, DAV College Managing Committee, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi-110055 (ii) the Principal/Manager, DAV Senior Secondary Public School, Ambota, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged changes in the service conditions of the workmen from contract basis to put their services through outsource agency by the employer without following the provisions of Section-9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 w.e.f. April, 2019.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Amb, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub-section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated7441 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the action of the employers i.e. (i) the Managing Director, DAV College Managing Committee, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi-110055 (ii) the Principal/Manager, DAV Senior Secondary Public School, Ambota, District Una, H.P. to change the service conditions of S/Shri Satish Kumar, Karnail Singh, Dharam Singh, and Jagvinder Singh from contract basis to out source agency w.e.f. April, 2019 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what relief of service benefits, continuity in service, seniority and regularization the above workmen are entitled to from the aforesaid employers?"

Sd/- DeputyLabour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 25th August, 2021

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2021-Una.— It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Som Dutt and others workers of M/s Luminous Power Technologies (P) Limited, Unit-5, Gagret, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. and the Occupier/Factory Manager, M/s Luminous Power Technologies Private Limited, Unit-5, Gagret, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. on the issue of demands raised vide demand notice dated 30-08-2019.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Una, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether demands No. (2),(3),(4),(5),(11) and (12) as raised vide demand notice dated 30-08-2019 (copy enclosed) by Shri Som Dutt and others workers of M/s Luminous Power Technologies (P) Limited, Unit-5, Gagret, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. to be fulfilled by the Occupier/Factory Manager, M/S Luminous Power Technologies Private Limited, Unit-7442 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 5, Gagret, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P., are legal and justified? If yes, what monetary and other consequential service benefits, the above mentioned workmen are entitled to? and if not, its effects?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner,

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th March, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sansar Chand s/o Shri Sagli Ram, r/o V.P.O. Badoli, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Una, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sansar Chand s/o Shri Sagli Ram, r/o V.P.O. Badoli, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, compensation and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/-

Joint Labour Commissioner.

7443 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 28th April, 2022

No. 11-2/86(Lab)ID/2022-Bilaspur.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Saroj Kumar s/o Shri Prem Singh, r/o Village Tihra, P.O. Malyavar, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. and the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. on the issue of his alleged termination from services w.e.f. 01-07-2018.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Officer-cum-Conciliation Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., she tried her level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Saroj Kumar s/o Shri Prem Singh, r/o Village Tihra, P.O. Malyavar, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. w.e.f. 01-07-2018 by the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, regularization and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

___________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 1st February, 2021

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2021-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Satish Kumar s/o Shri Bhagwan Dass, r/o Village Langdi, P.O. Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Deepak Fasteners Limited, Unit- II, Industrial Area Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination of his services during June, 2020.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Tahliwal Circle, District Una, H.P., he tried his level7444 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether termination of the services of Shri Satish Kumar S/O Shri Bhagwan Dass, R/O Village Langdi, P.O. Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/s Deepak Fasteners Limited, Unit-II, Industrial Area Tahliwal, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. during June, 2020, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 15th June, 2021

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2021-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Saurabh Kumar s/o Shri Jaswinder, r/o V.P.O. Bathu, Ward No.-7, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Asterisk Healthcare, V.P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. on the issue of his alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 01-09-2020.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Tahliwal, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

7445 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Saurabh Kumar S/O Shri Jaswinder, R/O V.P.O. Bathu, Ward No.-7, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 01-09-2020 by the Managing Director, M/s Asterisk Healthcare, V.P.O. Bathri, Tehsil Haroli, District Una, H.P., without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/Management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 17th February, 2021

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2021-Dehra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Ms. Seema d/o Shri Dev Raj, r/o V.P.O. Rainta, Tehsil Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. and the Project Director, Him Institute for Rural Development TI, Office Near Petrol Pump, V.P.O. Khola, Tehsil Jawalamukhi, District Kangra, H.P. on the issue of alleged termination from services during September, 2020.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.

7446 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 21st October, 2021

No. 11-5/99(Lab)ID/2021-Chamba.— It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Shafi Mohammad s/o Shri Jaan Mohammad, r/o Village Beri, P.O. Palyur, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. and (i) the General Manager, Jagdambay Hydro Project Quarsi, Jagdambay Hydro Project LLP, 1st Floor Building, Village Guganh, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. (ii) the Project Manager, Jagdambay Hydro Project, Office at Village Hilling, P.O. Lamu, Sub-Tehsil Holi, District Chamba, H.P. (iii) Mr. Murgesh Shah Zaveri & Co. Private Limited, Swajat CG Ahamdabad, Gujarat on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 31-05-2020.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under Section- 7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the oral termination of services of Shri Shafi Mohammad s/o Shri Jaan Mohammad, r/o Village Beri, P.O. Palyur, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. w.e.f. 31-05-2020 by (i) the General Manager, Jagdambay Hydro Project Quarsi, Jagdambay Hydro Project LLP, 1st Floor Building, Village Guganh, Tehsil & District Chamba, H.P. (ii) the Project Manager, Jagdambay Hydro Project, Office at Village Hilling, P.O. Lamu, Sub Tehsil Holi, District Chamba, H.P. (iii) Mr. Murgesh Shah Zaveri & Co. Private Limited, Swajat CG Ahamdabad, Gujarat, without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above empioyers/management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 20th February, 2021

No. 11-1/85(Lab)ID/2021-Kangra.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sandeep Singh s/o Shri Viresh Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Dahab, Tehsil7447 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. and the Employer/Management, M/S GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Village Dharampur, Shimla-Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal verbal termination from services w.e.f. 04-04-2019.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., she tried her level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the verbal termination of services of Shri Sandeep Singh s/o Shri Viresh Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Dahab, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P. by the Employer/Management, M/s GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Village Dharampur, Shimla-Chandigarh Highway, District Solan, H.P. w.e.f. 04-04-2019 without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits and compensation the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/Management?"

Sd/- Deputy Labour Commissioner.

____________

LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 001, the 5th March, 2022

No. 11-23/84(Lab)ID/2022-Una.—It appears to the undersigned that an industrial dispute exists between Shri Sandeep Chand s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o V.P.O. Diara, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. and the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. on the issue of alleged illegal termination from services w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry.

As per the report under section-12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 submitted by the Labour Inspector-cum-Conciliation Officer, Una, District Una, H.P., he tried his level best to settle the dispute during conciliation proceedings but could not succeed. The report so received has been considered by the undersigned and as per power vested under sub section-5 of Section-12 of the Act ibid, the undersigned has formed an opinion and decided that this dispute is required to be legally adjudicated by the Labour Court/ Industrial Tribunal.

7448 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

Therefore, the undersigned while exercising the powers of appropriate Government vested in me vide Himachal Pradesh Government Notification No.: Shram (A) 4-9/2006-IV-Loose, Dated 15th February, 2014 and as per power vested under sub section-1 of Section-10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) this industrial dispute is referred to the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. constituted under section-7 of Act ibid, on the following issue/ issues for legal adjudication:—

"Whether the termination of services of Shri Sandeep Chand s/o Shri Bidhi Chand, r/o V.P.O. Diara, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. by the Managing Director, M/s Inox Wind Limited, Plot No.-1, Khasra No.-264-267, Industrial Area, V.P.O. Basal, Tehsil & District Una, H.P. w.e.f. 29-02-2020 vide letter dated 07-03-2020 after conducting domestic enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, compensation and past service benefits the above worker is entitled to from the above employer/management?"

Sd/- Joint Labour Commissioner.

___________

In the Court of Sh. Bhanu Gupta (H.P.A.S.), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban),

District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Miss Neha d/o Sh. Arjun Singh, r/o Sunny Meal, Cart Road, PWD Store Near RTO, Shimla District Shimla (H.P.) .

. . Applicant.

Versus

General Public

.. Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Miss Neha d/o Sh. Arjun Singh, r/o Sunny Meal, Cart Road, PWD Store Near RTO, Shimla District Shimla (H.P.) has preferred an application to the undersigned for registration of date of birth of herself namely NEHA (DOB-06-02-2000) at above address in the record of Municipal Corporation, Shimla.

Therefore through this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection for entry of date of birth mentioned above, may submit his objection in writing in this court within 30 (Thirty) days from the date of publication of this notice in official Gazette. No objection will be entertained after prescribed period and application will be decided accordingly.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court on this 2nd November, 2022.

Seal.

BHANU GUPTA (HPAS), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Urban), District Shimla (H.P.).

7449 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

In the Court of Sh. Nishant Kumar (H.P.A.S.), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Rural),

District Shimla (H.P.)

1. Sh. Vikram Kanwar s/o Sh. Shiv Pal Singh Kanwar, r/o Village & P.O. Malyana, Tehsil Shimla Rural, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Shalini Thakur d/o Sh. Ajmer Singh, r/o Village Kamli, P.O. Parwanoo (Taksal), Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh. Versus

General Public

Subject.—Registration of Marriage under section 8(4) of the Himachal Pradesh Registration of

Marriage Act, 1996.

Sh. Vikram Kanwar s/o Sh. Shiv Pal Singh Kanwar, r/o Village & P.O. Malyana, Tehsil Shimla Rural, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh and Shalini Thakur d/o Sh. Ajmer Singh, r/o Village Kamli, P.O. Parwanoo (Taksal), Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 04-12-2015 but the marriage has not been found entered in the record of Registrar of Gram Panchayat concerned/ Municipal Corporation Shimla.

Therefore, objections are hereby invited from the General Public through this notice, that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, they can file their objections personally or in writing before the court of undersigned on or before 28-11-2022. After that no objection shall be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued under my hand and seal of the court today on 27th day of October, 2022.

Seal.

NISHANT KUMAR (H.P.A.S.), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Rural).

__________

In the Court of Sh. Nishant Kumar (H.P.A.S.), Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Rural),

District Shimla (H.P.)

1. Sh. Nitin Sood s/o Sh. Ashok Kumar Sood, r/o Goel Apartments, Flat No.1, Kangnadhar, Phase-III, New Shimla, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Tanya Gupta d/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta, r/o House No. 2290, Sector 15, Sonipat Haryana- 131001. Versus

General Public

Subject.—Registration of Marriage under section 8(4) of the Himachal Pradesh Registration of

Marriage Act, 1996.

7450 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944

Sh. Nitin Sood s/o Sh. Ashok Kumar Sood, r/o Goel Apartments, Flat No.1, Kangnadhar, Phase-III, New Shimla, Tehsil & District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh and Tanya Gupta d/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta, r/o House No. 2290, Sector 15, Sonipat Haryana-131001 have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 05-07-2022 but the marriage has not been found entered in the records of Registrar of marriages of Gram Panchayat concerned/ Municipal Corporation Shimla.

Therefore, objections are hereby invited from the General Public through this notice, that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, they can file their objections personally or in writing before the court of undersigned on or before 29-11-2022. After that no objection shall be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly.

Issued under my hand and seal of the court today on 28th day of October, 2022.

Seal.

NISHANT KUMAR (H.P.A.S.), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Shimla (Rural).

__________

ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, कुमारसैन, तहसील कुमारसैन, जिला शिमला (हि0प्र0)

मिसल नं0 : 09/2022 तारीख संस्थापन : 20-10-2022 श्रीमती सुदर्शना पुत्री श्री देवी दत्त पुत्र ईशरु, निवासी कशमेड़ी, डाकघर बड़ागांव द्वारा श्री अभय पुत्र श्रीमती सुदर्शना, निवासी कशमेड़ी, डाकघर बड़ागांव, तहसील कुमारसैन, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) . . प्रार्थी।

बनाम

आम जनता

. .प्रत्यार्थी। भू-राजस्व अधिनियम, 1954 की धारा (37)1 के तहत राजस्व कागजात में नाम दुरुस्ती बारे दरख्वास्त। श्री अभय पुत्र श्रीमती सुदर्शना पुत्री श्री देवी दत्त, निवासी कशमेड़ी, डाकघर बड़ागांव, तहसील कुमारसैन, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0) ने अदालत हजा में अपनी मृतक माता का नाम दुरुस्त करने हेतु प्रार्थना-पत्र मय नकल जमाबन्दी साल 2018-2019, प्रतिलिपि मृत्यु प्रमाण-पत्र, प्रतिलिपि शैक्षणिक प्रमाण-पत्र, प्रतिलिपी आधार कार्ड आदि सहित गुजार कर निवेदन किया है कि पटवार वृत्त कुमारसैन के राजस्व रिकार्ड में अराजी खाता/खतौनी नं0 75 मिन/119 मिन, खसरा नम्बर 884, रकबा तादादी 00-01-17 है0, महाल कुमारसैन में उसकी माता का नाम रंजना गलत दर्ज है, जबकि प्रार्थी के मुताबिक उसकी माता का नाम प्रस्तुत करवाये गए सबूतों के अनुरूप सुदर्शना है। प्रार्थी ने निवेदन किया है कि पटवार वृत्त कुमारसैन, महाल कुमारसैन के राजस्व कागजात में उसकी माता के नाम को दुरुस्त करने के आदेश पारित किये जावें। अतः आम जनता को इस इश्तहार के माध्यम से सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि प्रार्थी की माता का नाम राजस्व अभिलेख में रंजना के स्थान पर सुदर्शना दर्ज कर लिया जावे तो इस बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह मिति 29-11-2022 को प्रातः 11.00 बजे तक अथवा इस तिथि से पूर्व किसी कार्य दिवस में असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर आकर अपना एतराज दर्ज करवा सकता है अन्यथा इस तिथि तक कोई भी एतराज पेश न होने की सूरत में प्रार्थी की माता का नाम कागजात माल में दुरुस्त करने के आदेश पारित कर दिए जाएंगे।7451 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 यह आदेश आज दिनांक 29-10-2022 को हस्ताक्षर व मोहर सहित जारी हुए।

मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम श्रेणी, तहसील कुमारसैन, जिला शिमला (हि0 प्र0)।

----------

In the Court of Shri Multan Singh Banyal, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar) Solan,

District Solan (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Smt. Lata w/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Smt. Lata w/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents for entering of date of birth of her daughter namely Nandini i.e. 03-04-2010 at home Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh but her date of birth could not be entered in the record of Municipal Corporation Solan, Tehsil & District Solan.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection(s) for the registration of delayed date of birth of Nandini d/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh may submit their objection in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 16-11-2022 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 17 th day of October, 2022.

Seal. MULTAN SINGH BANYAL, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Solan, District Solan (H. P.).

___________

In the Court of Shri Multan Singh Banyal, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar) Solan,

District Solan (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Smt. Lata w/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District . .Applicant. Solan, Himachal Pradesh

Versus

7452 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 General Public . .Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Smt. Lata w/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents for entering of date of birth of her daughter namely Tanvi i.e. 10-04-2012 at home Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh but her date of birth could not be entered in the record of Municipal Corporation Solan, Tehsil & District Solan.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection(s) for the registration of delayed date of birth of Tanvi d/o Shri Sandeep, r/o Village Kaleen, Ward No. 13, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh may submit their objection in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 16-11-2022 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 17th day of October, 2022.

Seal. MULTAN SINGH BANYAL, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Solan, District Solan (H. P.).

___________

In the Court of Shri Multan Singh Banyal, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar) Solan,

District Solan (H. P.)

In the matter of :

Sh. Ankush Kumar Gill s/o Shri Vinod Kumar, r/o H. No. 496, Kashmiri Mohalla, Cantt. . .Applicant. Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan.

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Sh. Ankush Kumar Gill s/o Shri Vinod Kumar, r/o H. No. 496, Kashmiri Mohalla, Cantt. Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavit and other documents for entering this date of birth i.e. 06-10-1996 at H. No. 496, Kashmiri Mohalla, Cantt. Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh but his date of birth could not be entered in the record of Cantt. Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection(s) for the registration of delayed date of birth of Sh. Ankush Kumar Gill s/o Shri Vinod Kumar, r/o H. No. 496, Kashmiri Mohalla, Cantt. Board Subathu, Tehsil & District Solan, Himachal Pradesh may submit their objection in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 16-11-2022 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

7453 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 17 th day of October, 2022.

Seal. MULTAN SINGH BANYAL, Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Solan, District Solan (H. P.).

___________

In the Court of Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar) Baddi, District Solan (H.P.)

Case No. : 27 /2022. Date of Institution : 17-10-2022 Date of Decision : 17-11-2022 Smt. Astri Murmu w/o Late Shri Sunil Marandi, r/o Village Basantpur, Bannagram, Pakur Jharkhand-916117.

Versus

General Public through : Gram Panchayat Lodhimajra, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan (H.P.).

Application under section 13(3) of H.P. Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Smt. Astri Murmu w/o Late Shri Sunil Marandi, r/o Village Basantpur, Bannagram, Pakur Jharkhand-916117 has filed an application under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 stating therein that her husband Sh. Sunil Marandi was died on dated 21-04-2021 at Village Doduwal, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh but her death could not be registered in Gram Panchayat Lodhimajra, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan, H.P. within stipulated period. She prayed for passing necessary orders to the Registrar, Birth & Death G. P. Lodimajra, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan for entering the same.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection regarding registering the death of Sh. Sunil Marandi may file his objection in this court on or before 17-11-2022, failing which no objection shall be entertained.

Given under my hand and seal on this 17-10-2022.

Seal.

Sd/-,

Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar),

Baddi, District Solan (H P.).

___________

ब अदालत सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम वर्ग (तहसीलदार), बद्‌दी, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश मुकद्दमा नम्बरदारी नं0 : 2/2022 बाबत नियुक्ति नम्बरदार मौजा किशनपुरा। इश्तहार आम जनता बाबत वाशिन्दगान देह/खेवटदारान मौजा किशनपुरा।

हरगाह हर खास व आम को बजरिया इश्तहार आम सूचित किया जाता है कि श्री परविन्द्र सिंह पुत्र स्व0 राम प्रकाश नम्बरदार साकन गांव किशनपुरा, तहसील बद्‌दी ने बाबत नियुक्ति नम्बरदार मौजा किशनपुरा प्रार्थना-पत्र दिया है।

अतः जिस किसी को इस नव नियुक्ति बारा एतराज हो वह अदालत हजा में असालतन या वकालतन उपस्थित आकर उजर दिनांक 21-11-2022 को या इससे पूर्व पेश कर सकता है, बाद गुजरने मियाद कोई उजर काबल समायत न होगा।7454 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 आज दिनांक 20-10-2022 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी किया गया। हस्ताक्षरित/- मोहर। सहायक समाहर्ता प्रथम वर्ग (तहसीलदार), तहसील बद्‌दी, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

-----------

In the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kasauli-cum-Marriage Officer Kasauli,

District Solan (H.P.)

1. Happy Shekh s/o Janab Shekhar Hasin, aged 38 years, r/o A-1, Blook-41, Parwanoo, Solan (H.P.)-173220.

Versus

General Public

An application under section 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 has been received in this court from Happy Shekh s/o Janab Shekhar Hasin, aged 38 years, r/o A-1, Blook-41, Parwanoo, Solan (H.P.)-173220 (Bridegroom) and Tarana Khan d/o Nisar Ahmed, r/o House No. 2253, Phase-2, Ramdarbar, Chandigarh to get their marriage u/s 15 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Before taking further action in the said application, objections from the general public are invited for the registration of this marriage, objections in this regard should reach to this court on or before 15-11-2022 failing which the marriage shall be got registered as per the provisions of the law.

Issued on 11-10-2022 my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

DHANBIR THAKUR (HAS), Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kasauli, District Solan (H.P.).

____________

In the Court of Collector, Sub-Division Kandaghat, District Solan (H.P.)

Case No. : 17-8/ 2022 Date of Instt. : 01-12-2020 D. O. D. : 21-11-2022 Sh. Pawan Singh s/o Sh. Liaq Ram, r/o Village Kakra, P.O. & Sub-Tehsil Mamleeg, District . . Appellant. Solan (H.P.)

V/s

S.D.O., P.W.D., Kunihar, Sub-Tehsil Kunihar, District Solan (H.P.) . . Respondent.

Appeal u/s 14 of HPLR, Act, against order dated 03-11-2020 passed by Assistant Collector,

2nd Grade Mamligh in demarcation case No. 12/VIII of 2020 titled as Pawan Singh and others

Versus S.D.O., P.W.D., Kunihar and others.

That the above titled case pending before this Court and is fixed for hearing on dated 21-11-2022 for the service of respondent No. 2 and 7 i.e. Sh. Durga Prasad s/o Sh. Mansa Ram, r/o7455 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 Village Kakra, P.O. Dehola, Sub-Tehsil Mamligh, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh and Sh. Ramesh s/o Sh. Lt. Sh. Rati Ram, r/o Village Sanet, P.O. & Sub- Tehsil Mamleeg, District Solan (H.P.) respectively. The sevice of the respondent No. 2 and 7 was not effective despite various efforts. This court is in agreement that the service could not be made despite various efforts.

Therefore, by this notice the respondent No. 2 and 7 named above are hereby informed to appear before this court on 21-11-2022 to file their reply or to plead this case through their counsel, otherwise action will be taken in this case as per law.

Issued on dated 17-10-2022 under my signature and stamp of this Court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Collector, Sub-Division,

Kandaghat, District Solan (H. P.).

____________

ब अदालत उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी, अर्की, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश

केस नं0 : 33/2022 दिनांक : 18-10-2022 तारीख पेशी : 17-11-2022 श्री अक्षय कुमार पुत्र श्री बृज मोहन, निवासी गांव खाड़ी खनोल, डाकघर कुनिहार, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश।

व

नैन्सी पुत्री श्री मनसा राम, निवासी वार्ड नम्बर 1, नगर पंचायत अर्की, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0प्र0)

. . प्रार्थीगण।

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--विशेष विवाह पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1954 की धारा 5 के अन्तर्गत विवाह हेतु नोटिस।

प्रार्थी श्री अक्षय कुमार पुत्र श्री बृज मोहन, निवासी गांव खाड़ी खनोल, डाकघर कुनिहार, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन, हिमाचल प्रदेश तथा नैन्सी पुत्री श्री मनसा राम, निवासी वार्ड नम्बर 1, नगर पंचायत अर्की, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0प्र0) ने इस अदालत में विशेष विवाह पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1954 की धारा 5 के अन्तर्गत विवाह हेतु नोटिस दिया है।

अतः आम जनता को इस इश्तहार द्वारा सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगण के विवाह करने बारे कोई एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 17-11-2022 को या इससे पूर्व अपना लिखित अथवा मौखिक एतराज इस अदालत में प्रस्तुत कर सकता है। निर्धारित अवधि की समाप्ति उपरान्त उपरोक्त प्रार्थीगण को विवाह की अनुमति जारी कर दी जाएगी।

आज दिनांक 18-10-2022 को हमारे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/-

विवाह अधिकारी एवं उप-मण्डल दण्डाधिकारी, अर्की, तहसील अर्की, जिला सोलन (हि0प्र0)।7456 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 10 नवम्बर 2022/19 कार्तिक, 1944 In the Court of Executive Magistrate (Naib Tehsildar) Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.) Case No. : 09 /2022 Date of Institution : 22-09-2022 Fixed for the hearing : 28-11-2022 Sh. Ram Lal s/o Shri Nek Ram., r/o Vill. Shewla, P.O. Nayagram, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.).

Versus

General Public through : Gram Panchayat Mehlon, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.)

Application under section 13(3) of H.P. Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Sh. Ram Lal s/o Shri Nek Ram., r/o Vill. Shewla, P.O. Nayagram, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.) has filed an application under section 13(3) of the Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith letter of the Chief Medical Officer Solan, affidavits, copies of certificates and proclamation charges, stating therein that his father Sh. Nek Ram s/o Sh. Shukoo Ram expired on 01-08-2020 at their residence in Village Shewla, P.O. Nayagram, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.) within stipulated time period. He has prayed for issuing necessary orders to the Gram Panchayat Mehlon, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.) for entering the same in the records.

Therefore, by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having objection regarding registering the date of death of Sh. Nek Ram s/o Late Sh. Shukoo Ram r/o Village Shewla, P.O. Nayagram, Sub-Tehsil Parwanoo, District Solan (H.P.) can raise objection in this court on or before 28-11-2022, failing which no objection shall be entertained.

Given under my hand and seal on this 28th day October, 2022

Seal.

Sd/-,

Executive Magistrate (Naib Tehsildar),

Parwanoo, District Solan (H P.).

नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है।

Cite this issue. Himachal Pradesh Gazette, Government of Himachal Pradesh, 10 November 2022. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.himachal.2022-11-10.171_gazette_2022-10_11_2022/. Archive identifier in.gazette.himachal.2022-11-10.171_gazette_2022-10_11_2022.