Himachal Pradesh Gazette, No. 109, 22 August 2025

click here for IIIF manifest

राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश हिमाचल प्रदेश राज्य शासन द्वारा प्रकाशित शुक्रवार, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947

हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 18th August, 2025

No. HHC/GAZ/14-274/2009-I-Part.—Consequent upon the notification No. Home-B-B (10)1/2014-Vol-II, dated 12-10-2022, the benefit of the 1st Assured Career Progression Scale of 109-राजपत्र/2025-22-08-2025 (4891)4892 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 Rs. 92960-136520 (J-2) has been granted to the following members of H.P. Judicial Service in the cadre of Civil Judges with effect from the dates shown against their names:—

BY ORDEROF THE HON'BLE HIGH

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

__________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 18th August, 2025

No. HHC/GAZ/14-274/2009-I-Part.—Consequent upon the notification No. Home-B-B (10)1/2014-Vol-II, dated 12-10-2022, the benefit of the 2nd Assured Career Progression Scale of Rs. 111000-163030 (J-3) has been granted to the following members of H.P. Judicial Service in the cadre of Civil Judges with effect from the dates shown against their names:—

BY ORDEROF THE HON'BLE HIGH

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 18th August, 2025

No. HHC/GAZ/14-274/2009-I.—Consequent upon the notification No. Home-B-B (10)1/2014-Vol-II, dated 12-10-2022, the benefit of the 2nd Assured Career Progression Scale of Rs. 144840-194660 (J-5) has been granted to Sh. Harmesh Kumar, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr in the cadre of Senior Civil Judges with effect from 30-04-2024.

BY ORDEROF THE HON'BLE HIGH

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH.

__________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Shimla, the 18th August, 2025

No. HHC/GAZ/1-15/73-V.—The High court of Himachal Pradesh has been pleased to grant Selection Grade of Rs. 163030-219090 to Sh. Pankaj Sharma, Registrar (Admn., GAD & IT), High Court of H.P., Shimla, member of the H.P. Judicial Service in the cadre of District Judges/Additional District Judges, H.P. with effect from 20-06-2025 and shall be called as "Selection Grade District Judge."

By order,

Sd/- Registrar General.

___________

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA-171 001

NOTIFICATION

Dated, the 18th August, 2025

VIDEO CONFERENCING RULES

Object and Reasons

No. HHC/Rules/VC/Dist. Jud./2025.—Whereas, in order to avoid delay in judicial proceeding due to non-availability of parties, advocates, witnesses and accused physically, it is expedient to formalize and enable use of electronic communication and other audio-video electronic means for the purpose of conducting trial, inquiry and proceeding under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (No. 46 of 2023).

Whereas, the BNSS under section 54, 63, 64, 70, 71, 94, 154, 183, 187, 193, 209, 227, 230, 231, 251, 254, 262, 265, 266, 308, 310, 316, 336, 355, 356, 392, and 530 recognizes use of audio- video electronic means and other forms of electronic communication for different proceedings.

Whereas, Section 530 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) provides that all trials, inquiries and proceedings under this Sanhita, including examination of complainant and witnesses, recording of evidence in inquiries and trials and all appellate proceedings or any other proceeding, may be held in electronic mode, by use of electronic communication or use of audio-video electronic means.

Whereas, there is no restriction on civil courts in using video conferencing facilities in conducting trial.

Whereas, the District Judiciary in Himachal Pradesh has been using video conferencing facilities for conducting inquiries and trials in civil as well as criminal proceedings.

In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 227 of the Constitution of India, and all other enabling sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (No. 46 of 2023), audio-video electronic communication for District Courts, namely:—

CHAPTER- I

PRELIMINARY

1. Short title, Application and Commencement.—

(1) These Rules shall be called "The District Courts of Himachal Pradesh for the Use of Electronic Communication and Audio-Video Electronic Means Rules, 2025".

(2) They shall apply to the district courts of Himachal Pradesh, and to all judicial, departmental and mediation proceedings in pending cases.

(3) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. Definitions.—

(1) In these Rules, unless the context otherwise requires,—

(a) "Advocate" means and include an advocate entered in any roll maintained under the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and shall for the purpose of these rules, include prosecuting officers and government pleaders;

(b) "Advocate's remote point" means a place from where an advocate or advocates may appear through a live link and shall include advocate's chamber or office or a place notified by the Bar for video conferencing;

(c) "Commissioner" means a person appointed as commissioner under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) or any other law for the time being in force;

(d) "Coordinator" means a person nominated as coordinator under Rule 5;

(f) "Courtpoint" means the courtroom or the place where the court is physically convened, or the place where a commissioner or an inquiry officer holds proceedings pursuant to the directions of the court;

(g) "Courtroom" means the place or room or enclosed space in which court proceedings are held;

(h) "Designated Place" means any one or more places specified where the facilities are made available for use of electronic communication or use of audio-video electronic means with courts points and shall include Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centre from where evidence of such witnesses may be recorded;

(i) "Designated Video Conferencing Software" means a software approved by the High Court for the use of video conferencing or other audio-video electronic communication;

(j) "High Court" means the High Court of Himachal Pradesh;

(k) "Live link" means and includes a live link for audio-video electronic communication or other arrangements whereby a witness, an accused, party, advocate or any other person is required by Court to remain present virtually in the court room by use of electronic communication or use of audio-video electronic means;

(l) "Remote Point" means a place where any person is required to be present or appear through a live link and includes designated place from where submissions may be made before the Court but does not include Advocate's remote point;

(m) "Remote User" means a user participating in court proceedings through video conferencing at a designated place or advocates remote point;

(n) "Required Person" includes:

(i) a person who is to be examined as a witness, complainant or otherwise: or (ii) person in whose presence certain proceedings are to be recorded or conducted including an accused; or

(iii) an advocate or a party in person; or

(iv) any person including victim who is required to make submissions before the Court; or

(v) any other person who is permitted by the Court to appear through video conferencing or other modes of audio visual electronic communication;

(o) "Rules" shall mean these rules and any reference to a rule or sub-rule shall be a reference to a rule or sub-rule of these rules;

(2) The words and phrases used but not defined herein shall bear the same meaning as assigned to them in the concerned High Court Rules; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20234896 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 (BNSS); Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) and the General Clauses Act, 1897.

3. Construction of references.—

(1) Unless the context otherwise requires, any reference to Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in these Rules shall include reference to Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 under the corresponding provisions.

CHAPTER-II

GENERAL PRINCIPLES-1

Implementation of Video Conferencing under BNSS Provisions:

4.1. Electronic Hearings (BNSS Sec 530)

All trials, inquiries, and proceedings may be conducted electronically, including:

Examination of complainants and witnesses

Recording of evidence

Appellate and other judicial proceedings

4.2. Appearance via Video Conferencing (BNSS Sec 154, 355)

Persons required to appear before the court may do so via video conferencing, including cases where the accused is absent.

4.3. Accused in Judicial Custody (BNSS Sec 187)

Accused persons may be presented before the court via video conferencing, except for the first appearance, which requires physical presence.

4.4. Framing of Charges (BNSS Sec 251)

Charges may be read and explained to the accused through video conferencing, with their plea recorded electronically.

4.5. Evidence of Witnesses (BNSS Sec 254, 265, 266, 310, 356)

Witness testimonies and depositions may be recorded via audio-video means in designated locations.

4.6. Deposition of evidence of any police officer or public servants (BNSS Sec 254)

Testimonies of public servants may be recorded electronically to expedite legal proceedings.

4.7. Discharge of Accused (BNSS Sec 262)

Courts may examine the accused via electronic means before granting discharge,4897 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 4.8. Examination of Accused in Custody (BNSS Sec 316) Accused persons in custody may be examined electronically, with signature verification required within 72 hours.

4.9. Evidence from Public Servants, Experts and police officers (BNSS Sec 336)

Public officials, forensic experts, and police officers may provide evidence via video conferencing

4.10. Judgment Pronouncement (BNSS Sec 392)

Accused persons in custody may hear their judgment via video conferencing.

4.11. Presence of Accused during Evidence Recording (BNSS Sec 308)

Accused persons must be present, either physically or via video conferencing, during the recording of evidence.

CHAPTER-III

GENERAL PRINCIPLES-2

5. General Principles Governing Video Conferencing and other modes of Audio-video

electronic communication.—

Subject to the provisions hereinafter contained, video conferencing and other modes of audio-visual electronic communication may be used at all stages of judicial proceedings and proceedings conducted by the Court, where a person is required to be present or appear is not physically present in court room:

(i) All proceedings conducted by a Court via video conferencing and other modes of audio-visual electronic communication shall be judicial proceedings and all parties, decorum and protocols applicable to these proceedings;

(ii) All relevant statutory provisions applicable to judicial proceedings including provisions of BNSS, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, BSA and IT Act, shall apply to proceedings conducted by video conferencing;

(iii) Subject to maintaining independence, impartiality and credibility of judicial proceedings, and subject to such directions as the High Court may issue, Courts may adopt such technological advances as may become available from time to time;

(iv) Courts shall use only High Court/government approved and secure video conferencing platforms equipped with end-to-end encryption to protect data and privacy;

(v) Any unauthorized access, hacking attempts, or security breaches must be reported immediately and addressed in accordance with the law;

(vi) The Rules as applicable to a Court shall mutatis mutandis apply to a Commissioner appointed by the Court to record evidence and to an inquiry officer conducting an inquiry;

(vii) Unless expressly permitted by Court, no person, either at Court Point or at designated place or at Remote Point or Advocate's Remote Point, shall record or publish the proceedings conducted by video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication;

(viii)There shall be no unauthorised recording of the proceedings by any person or entity.

6. Identification of person appearing through video conferencing or other modes of

audio-visual electronic communication.—

The person defined in rule 2(1)(n) shall provide an identity proof as recognized by the Government of India or State Government to the court point coordinator by electronic communication. In case, identity proof is not readily available, the Court may, upon satisfaction allow such person to participate in proceedings without production of identity proof.

7. Facilities recommended for Video Conferencing.—

(i) Each courtroom should be equipped with a video conferencing facility to enable seamless connectivity with stakeholders. This integration will eliminate the need to move to a separate dedicated room for virtual hearings, ensuring efficiency, saving time, and enhancing judicial proceedings.

(ii) A dedicated and exclusive video conferencing center should be established promptly at each District and Tehsil level.

(iii) A dedicated space for video conferencing within police stations, prisons, prosecution offices, forensic departments, and other designated places.

The following equipments are recommended for conducting proceedings by video conferencing at the Court Point and the Remote Point:

8. The designated video conferencing software to be procured by High Court shall

facilitate following minimum requirements.—

(i) an online, real-time collaboration software with features like video, voice, screen sharing, document sharing, presentation, recording etc.

(ii) the solution should have a whiteboard for flashing messages and recording meetings or sessions.

(iii) the complete access log of the different users with extended reports, including IP/ Device details/Application details, should be provided with each meeting room.

(iv) the platform should be hosted on an India-based data centre with a 100% Disaster recovery site.

(v) the platform must offer cross-platform functionality, ensuring seamless operation across various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, IOS etc., to accommodate diverse technology ecosystems of all participants and guarantee a consistent user experience regardless of the operating system used.

(vi) the platform must be scalable to multi point connectivity with 500 user logins at a time.

(vii) the platform must provide private and confidential Breakout rooms, between multiple users.

advocates with waiting lobby and automatic pulling according to the cause list.

(ix) the platform must provide master control facility at Court's end, recording and archiving facility at court point, server or cloud.

(x) the platform must provide audit trail facility of the proceedings and also provision of a firewall.

9. Appointment of Co-ordinators.—

(1) There shall be a coordinator both at the Court Point and at the designated place from where any required person is to be examined or heard or is directed to remain present. However, coordinator may be required at the remote point only when a witness or a person accused of an offence is to be examined;

(2) In all the Courts, one or more persons nominated by the High Court or the Principal District and Sessions Judge concerned within whose jurisdiction the respective Court is present, shall perform the functions of the coordinators at the designated place.

(3) The Court may appoint any court official as a coordinator at the Court Point.

(4) The coordinator at the designated place may be any of the following:

(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 3.4.1, where witness examination is to take place in a criminal case of a person located outside the country, the provisions of the BNSS 2023 (Section 110 & Chapter 8) and "Comprehensive Guidelines for investigation abroad and issue of Letters Rogatory (LRs) /Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) Request and Service of Summons Notices Judicial documents in respect of Criminal Matters prevailing at that time" will be followed to the extent they comport with the provisions of the BNSS and BSA.

10. Preparatory arrangements.—

(1) The coordinator at the designated place/remote point shall ensure that;

(a) the required persons scheduled to appear in a particular proceeding are ready at the remote point/designated place for video conferencing well before the scheduled time;

(b) no unauthorized recording device is used;

(c) no unauthorized person enters the remote point or designated place when the video conference is in progress;

(d) the person being examined is not prompted, tutored, coaxed, induced or coerced in any manner by any person and that the person being examined does not refer to any document, script or device without the permission of the Court concerned during the course of examination.

(2) Where the witness to be examined through video conferencing or other audio-visual electronic communication requires or if it is otherwise expedient to do so, the Court shall give sufficient notice in advance, setting out the schedule of video conferencing and in appropriate cases may provide the copies of all or any part of the relevant documents in electronic form to the coordinator of the concerned remote point.

(3) Before the scheduled video conferencing, the Court shall ensure that the coordinator at the designated place or remote point receives in electronic form, copies of all or any part of the4902 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 documents which may be required for recording of evidence, or for reference of the witness. However, coordinator shall allow such documents in electronic form to be used by the required person only with the permission of the Court.

(4) Whenever required, the Court shall order the coordinator at the remote point or at the court point to provide—

(a) a translator in case the person to be examined is not conversant with the official language of the court;

(b) an expert in sign languages in case the person to be examined is impaired in speech and/or hearing;

(c) an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be, in case a person to be examined is differently abled, either temporarily or permanently;

(d) a person for reading of documents in case the person to be examined is visually challenged.

CHAPTER-IV

PROCEDURE FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING

11. Appearance through video conferencing and other modes of audio-visual electronic

communication.—

(1) In criminal cases, any party to the proceedings or witness, save and except where proceedings are initiated at the instance of the Court or on request of public prosecutor, may move a request for presence and proceedings through video conferencing (SCHEDULE-II).

(2) In civil cases, the court may, at its discretion or on request of any of the parties, initiate process for hearing of any case through video conferencing and other modes of audio-visual electronic communication.

(3) While allowing a request for video conferencing the Court may also fix the schedule for convening the video conferencing.

(4) An advocate may appear from advocate's remote point for making submissions or for examination of witnesses.

(5) Where video conferencing proceedings are conducted for making oral submissions, the order may require the advocate or party in person to submit written arguments and precedents, if any, in advance.

12. Service of processes.—

Processes issued to a witness who is to be examined through video conferencing, shall mention the date, time and venue of the concerned designated place and shall direct the witness to attend in person along with proof of identity. If a person is examined with reference to a particular document, then the process to witness must be accompanied by a copy of the document:

Provided that nothing in this rule shall preclude a court from conducting trials, inquires and proceedings in electronic mode, by use of electronic communication or use of audio-video electronic means.

audio-visual electronic communication—

(1) The person being examined through video conferencing and other modes of audio- visual electronic communication shall ordinarily be examined during the working hours of the court concerned or at such time as the court may deem fit.

(2) Where the person being examined is an accused, the court shall provide adequate opportunity to consult with his advocate before and after the video conferencing.

(3) The Court shall read over and explain the evidence recorded to the witness and obtain the signature of the person being examined on the transcript immediately after the examination is concluded. The signed transcript shall form part of the record of the judicial proceedings. The signature on the transcript of the person being examined shall be obtained in either of the following ways—

(a) If digital signatures are available at both the concerned Court Point and remote point, the copy of the transcript digitally signed by the presiding officer at the Court Point shall be sent by the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail to the coordinator at remote point where a print out of the same shall be taken and signed by the person being examined. A scanned copy of the transcript digitally signed by the coordinator at the remote point shall be transmitted by the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail of the Court Point;

(b) If digital signatures are not available, the printout of the transcript shall be signed by the presiding Judge, at the Court Point and shall be sent in non-editable scanned format by the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail account of the designated place or e-mail of the coordinator at remote point where a printout of the same shall be taken and signed by the person examined and countersigned by the coordinator at the remote point. A non- editable scanned format of the transcript so signed shall be sent by the coordinator at the remote point by the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail to the Court Point where a print out of the same shall be taken and shall be made a part of the judicial record.

(4) The court may, at the request of a person to be examined, or on its own motion, taking into account the best interest of the person to be examined, direct appropriate measures to protect the privacy of the person examined bearing in mind aspects such as age, gender, physical condition and recognized customs and practices.

(5) The coordinator at the designated place shall ensure that no person is present at the remote point, save and except the person being examined and those whose presence is deemed administratively necessary by the coordinator for the proceedings.

(6) The court may also impose such other conditions as are necessary in for effective hearing of cases through video conferencing and other modes of audio-video electronic communication.

(7) If the court thinks fit, the required person may be permitted to connect through video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication from the place of his residence or work:

Provided that evidence of a witness shall be recorded only from the designated place, except in situation hereinafter provided.

(8) Where a required person is not capable of reaching the Court Point or the designated place due to sickness or physical infirmity, or whose presence cannot be secured without undue delay or expense, the Court may authorize conduct of video conferencing from the place at which such person is located. In such circumstances the court may direct the use of portable video conferencing systems and ensure presence as it may deem fit.

(9) Where the court is of opinion, for the reasons recorded in writing that, evidence of the witness cannot be effectively recorded, may decline to examine such witness through video conferencing

14. Exhibiting or showing documents to witness or accused at a remote point.—

If in the course of examination of a person at a remote point by video conferencing, it is necessary to show a document to the person, the Court may permit the document to be shown in the following manner:

(a) if the document is at Court Point, by transmitting the document through document visualizer;

(b) if the document is at Court Point, but document visualizer is not available, by transmitting a copy or image of the document to the remote point electronically through the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail;

(c) if the document is at the remote point, by transmitting a copy or image of the document to the Court Point electronically through the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail. The hard copy of the document counter signed by the witness and the coordinator at the designated place shall also be dispatched to the Court Point.

15. Ensuring seamless video conferencing.—

(1) The coordinator at Court Point shall provide the live link of the video conferencing, hearing with advocates or the required person.

(2) If the proceedings are carried out from any place other than a remote point, the coordinator, if any, at such remote point shall ensure compliance of all technical requirements.

(3) The coordinator at the Court Point shall be in contact with the concerned advocate or the required person and guide them in regard to the fulfillment of technical and other requirements for executing a successful hearing through video conferencing. Any problem faced by such advocate or the required person shall be resolved by the coordinator at Court Point.

(4) The coordinator at the Court Point shall ensure that any document or audio-visual files, emailed by the advocate or the required person, are duly received at the Court Point.

16. Remand.—

The court may authorize detention in judicial custody, of any person accused of an offence, by video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication as per the provisions of section 187 BNSS:

Provided that if the accused is already in judicial custody, whether of same Court or some other Court or is undergoing sentence, the Court may further remand him during inquiry4905 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 or trial under section 346(2) of the BNSS through video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication.

17. Plea bargaining.—

The Court may also use the modes of audio-visual electronic communication for the purpose of plea bargaining under Chapter XXIII of the BNSS.

18. Record of proceedings through audio-visual electronic communication.—

Wherever any proceeding is carried out by the Court under these rules by taking recourse to the modes of audio visual electronic communication, the Court shall mention in the order sheet, that the hearing is conducted through video conferencing.

CHAPTER-V

GENERAL PROCEDURE

19. General Procedure.—

(1) The procedure set out hereinafter in this chapter is without prejudice to the procedure indicated elsewhere in these rules where proceedings are conducted through video conferencing or other modes of audio visual electronic communication.

(2) The coordinator at the Court Point shall ensure that video conferencing is conducted only through a designated video conferencing software:

Provided that in the event of a technical fault or for any other sufficient cause, the Court may for reasons to be recorded in writing, permit the use of a software other than the designated video conferencing software for video conferencing in that particular proceeding:

Provided further that nothing contained in these rules shall prevent a Court, after recording its reasons in writing, from using any software other than the designated video conferencing software or other modes of audio visual electronic communication, to facilitate the hearing of cases in electronic mode.

(3) In criminal cases, where the person to be examined is a prosecution witness, or a court witness, or a defence witness, or a person is to make submission for prosecution, or a person is to make submission for defence, the advocate for the prosecution or defence or the accused, as the case may be, shall confirm to the Court the location of the person, and the time, place and technical facilities available for such video conferencing.

(4) If the accused is in custody and not present at the Court Point, the Court shall order a multi-point video conference between Court Point, the witness and the accused in custody to facilitate recording of the statement of the witness including medical or other experts.

20. Conduct of Proceedings. —

(1) All advocates, required persons, the party in person or any other person permitted by the Court to remain physically or virtually present (hereinafter collectively referred to as participants), shall have their presence recorded. However, in case participants are desirous that4906 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 their face or name be masked, information to that effect shall be furnished to the Court Point coordinator prior to the commencement of proceedings for the approval of the court.

(2) All Advocates, Required Persons, the party in person and/or any other person permitted by the Court to remain physically or virtually present (hereinafter collectively referred to as participants) shall abide by the requirements set out in Schedule-I.

(3) The Court Point coordinator shall send the live link on mobile number furnished by the participants permitted to be virtually present in the Court. Once the proceedings have commenced, no other person shall be permitted to participate in the virtual hearing, except with the permission of Court.

(4) Participation in the proceedings through video conferencing shall constitute consent by the participants to the proceedings being recorded.

(5) Establishment and disconnection of links between the Court Point and the remote point shall be regulated by orders of the Court.

(6) The court shall satisfy itself that the advocate, required person or any other participant that the court deems necessary at the remote point or the Court Point can be seen and heard clearly and can clearly see and hear the court.

(7) To ensure that video conferencing is conducted seamlessly, the difficulties, if any, experienced in connectivity must be brought to the notice of the Court at the earliest on the mobile number of the Court Point coordinator which has been furnished to the participant before the commencement of the video conferencing. No complaint shall be entertained subsequently.

21. Third parties to the case.—

(1) Third parties may be allowed to remain present during video conferencing only upon a specific order of the Court. However, they shall be passive participants and shall not be allowed to make any submission without permission of the Court.

(2) Where, for any reason, a person unconnected with the case is present at the remote point, that person shall be identified by the coordinator at the remote point at the beginning of the proceedings and the purpose of the presence of that person shall be conveyed to the Court. Such person shall continue to remain present only with the permission of the Court.

22. Costs of Video Conferencing.—

In the absence of rules prescribed by the concerned Court, the Court may take into consideration the following circumstances when determining and/or apportioning the costs of video conferencing :

(a) In criminal cases, the expenses of the video conferencing facility including expenses involved in preparing soft copies/certified copies of the Court record and transmitting the same to the Coordinator at the Remote Point, and the fee payable to the translator/interpreter/special educator, as the case may be, as also the fee payable to the Coordinator at the Remote Point, shall be borne by such party as directed by the Court.

(b) Besides the above, the Court may also make an order as to expenses as it considers appropriate, taking into account the rules/instructions regarding payment of expenses to the complainant and witnesses, as may be prevalent from time to time.

23. Access to Legal Aid Clinics/Camps/LokAdalats/Jail Adalats

(a) In conformity with the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and the laws in force, in proceedings related to Legal Aid Clinics, Camps, Lok Adalats or Jail Adalats, any person who at the Remote Point is in Jail or Prison shall be examined by the Chairman/Secretary of the District Legal Service Authority or Members of Lok Adalats before passing any award or orders as per law.

(b) Such award or order shall have the same force as if it was passed by the regular Lok Adalat or Jail Adalat.

(c) Copy of the award or order and the record of proceedings shall be sent to the Remote Point

24. Allowing persons who are not parties to the case to view the proceedings

To observe the requirement of an open Court proceeding, members of the public will be allowed to view Court hearings conducted through video conferencing, except proceedings ordered for reasons recorded in writing to be conducted in-camera. The Court shall endeavour to make available sufficient links (consistent with available bandwidth) for accessing the proceedings.

CHAPTER-VI

MISCELLANEOUS

25. Reference to Words and Expressions

Words and expressions used and not defined in these Rules shall have the same meaning as assigned to them in the BNSS, the BSA, the IT Act, and the General Clauses Act, 1897.

26. Power to Relax

The High Court may if satisfied that the operation of any Rule is causing undue hardship, by order dispense with or relax the requirements of that Rule to such extent and subject to such conditions, as may be stipulated to deal with the case in a just and equitable manner.

27. Residual Provisions

Matters concerning which no express provision has been made in these Rules shall be decided by the Court consistent with the principle of furthering the interests of justice.

28. Repeal and Savings

(1) The 'Himachal Pradesh High Court Video Conferencing Rules (For Courts), 2021' are hereby repealed to the extent to which these apply to the District Judiciary.

(2) Notwithstanding the repeal, provisions of Himachal Pradesh High Court Video Conferencing Rules (For Courts), 2021 shall apply to:—

(b) All notifications/orders published/issued under the Himachal Pradesh High Court Video Conferencing Rules (For Courts), 2021, to the extent they are not repugnant to these rules, shall be deemed to have been made or issued under these rules.

SCHEDULE-I

1. All participants shall wear sober attire consistent with the dignity of the proceedings. Advocates shall be appropriately dressed in professional attire prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961. Police officials shall appear in the uniform prescribed for police officials under the relevant statute or orders. The attire for judicial officers and court staff will be as specified in the relevant rules prescribed in that behalf by the High Court. The decision of the Presiding Judge or officer as to the dress code will be final.

2. Proceedings shall be conducted at the appointed date and time. Punctuality shall be scrupulously observed.

3. The case will be called out and appearances shall be recorded on the direction of the Court.

4. Every participant shall adhere to the courtesies and protocol that are followed in a physical Court. Judges will be addressed as "Madam/Sir" or "Your Honour". Officers will be addressed by their designation such as "Bench Officer/Court Master", Advocates will be addressed as "Learned Counsel/Senior Counsel".

5. Advocates, Required Persons, parties in person and other participants shall keep their microphones muted till they are called upon to make submissions.

6. Remote Users shall ensure that their devices are free from malware.

7. Remote Users and the Coordinator at the Remote Point shall ensure that the Remote Point is situated in a quiet location, is properly secured and has sufficient internet coverage. Any unwarranted disturbance caused during video conferencing may if the Presiding Judge so directs render the proceedings non-est.

8. All participants' cell phones shall remain switched off or in airplane mode during the proceedings.

9. All participants should endeavor to look into the camera, remain attentive and not engage in any other activity during the proceedings.

10. Background noise, unnecessary movements and interruptions must be minimized to maintain the decorum of judicial proceedings.

11. The use of offensive language, disrespectful behavior, or non-compliance with judicial instructions may lead to immediate removal from the session and potential legal consequences.

12. Only court have the discretion to mute or remove any participant violating these conduct rules.

REQUEST FORM FOR VIDEO CONFERENCE

1. Case Number/CNR Number (if any)

2. Cause Title

3. Proposed Date of conference (DD/MM/YYYY):__________________

4. Location of the Court Point(s):________________________________

5. Location of the Remote Point(s):_______________________________

6. Names & Designation of the Participants at the Remote Point:_______

7. Reasons for Video Conferencing:

In the matter of

8. Nature of Proceedings: Final Hearing Motion Hearing Others I have read and understood the provisions of Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts (hyperlink). I undertake to remain bound by the same to the extent applicable to me. I agree to pay video conferencing charges if so, directed by the Court.

Signature of the applicant/authorised signatory:

Date:

(A) Bench assigned:

(B) Hearing:

Held on (DD/MM/YYYY):

Commencement Time:

End time:

Number of hours:

(C) Costs: Overseas transmission charges if any:

To be Incurred by Applicant/Respondent: To be shared equally:

Waived; as ordered by the Court:

Signature of the authorised officer.

Date:

Sd/- (AMAN SOOD), Registrar (Rules).

शहरी विकास विभाग

अधिसूचना

शिमला-171 002, 22 अगस्त, 2025

संख्याः यू0डी0-ए(3)-15/2024-रूल्ज.--हिमाचल प्रदेश के राज्यपाल, हिमाचल प्रदेश नगरपालिका अधिनियम, 1994 (1994 का अधिनियम संख्यांक 13) की धारा 279 और 304 द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, राज्य निर्वाचन आयोग के परामर्श से, हिमाचल प्रदेश नगरपालिका निर्वाचन नियम, 2015 में निम्नलिखित संशोधन करने का प्रस्ताव करते हैं और इन्हें पूर्वाेक्त अधिनियम की धारा 279 की उप-धारा(5) के अधीन यथा अपेक्षित के अनुसार जनसाधारण की सूचना के लिए राजपत्र (ई-गजट), हिमाचल प्रदेश में एतद्‌द्वारा प्रकाशित किया जाता है;

इन प्रारूप नियमों से सम्भाव्य प्रभावित होने वाले यदि किसी हितबद्ध व्यक्ति को इन नियमों की बाबत कोई आक्षेप(पों) या सुझाव(वों) है/हैं तो वह उसे/उन्हें, उक्त नियमों के राजपत्र(ई-गजट), हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशन की तारीख से दस दिन की अवधि के भीतर, प्रधान सचिव (शहरी विकास) हिमाचल प्रदेश को भेज सकेगा/सकेंगे;

नियत अवधि के भीतर प्राप्त हुए आक्षेप(आक्षेपों) या सुझाव(सुझावों), यदि कोई हो/हों, पर उक्त प्रारूप नियमों को अंतिम रूप देने से पूर्व सरकार द्वारा विचार किया जाएगा, अर्थात्‌ः-

1. संक्षिप्त नाम और प्रारम्भ.--(1) इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम हिमाचल प्रदेश नगरपालिका निर्वाचन (संशोधन) नियम, 2025 है।

(2) ये नियम राजपत्र (ई-गजट), हिमाचल प्रदेश में प्रकाशन की तारीख से प्रवृत्त होंगे।

2. नियम 9 का संशोधन.--हिमाचल प्रदेश नगरपालिका निर्वाचन नियम, 2015 (जिन्हें इसमें इसके पश्चात्‌ ''उक्त नियम'' कहा गया है) के नियम 9 के उप-नियम (1) में, ''तीस दिन की अवधि के भीतर'' शब्दों के पश्चात्‌ ''प्ररूप-2क में'' शब्द, चिन्ह और अंक जोड़े जाएंगे।''

3. नियम 27 का संशोधन.--उक्त नियमों के नियम 27 के उप-नियम (1) के विद्यमान परन्तुक के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित परन्तुक रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्‌ः-

''परन्तु यह कि इस नियम के अधीन कोई भी आवेदन, इन नियमों के नियम 35 के अधीन निर्वाचन कार्यक्रम की अधिसूचना के पश्चात्‌ प्रस्तुत नहीं किया जाएगा।''

4. नियम 28 का संशोधन.--उक्त नियमों के नियम 28 के उप-नियम (1) के विद्यमान परन्तुक के स्थान पर निम्नलिखित परन्तुक रखा जाएगा, अर्थात्‌ः-

''परन्तु यह और कि इस नियम के अधीन कोई भी आवेदन, इन नियमों के नियम 35 के अधीन निर्वाचन कार्यक्रम की अधिसूचना के पश्चात्‌ प्रस्तुत नहीं किया जाएगा।''

5. नियम 88 का संशोधन.--उक्त नियमों के नियम 88 में,-

(i) शीर्षक में ''निर्वाचित'' शब्द के पश्चात्‌ ''या नामनिर्दिष्ट '' शब्द जोड़े जाएंगे।

(ii) उप-नियम (1) के पश्चात्‌ निम्नलिखित नया परन्तुक अन्तःस्थापित किया जाएगाः-

''परन्तुक यदि किसी सदस्य का नामांकन राजपत्र(ई-गजट), हिमाचल प्रदेश में अधिसूचित किया जाता है तो वह, यथास्थिति, उप-नियम(1) के अधीन विहित प्रक्रिया के अनुसार भारत के संविधान उसकी निष्ठा की शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान लेगा।''4911 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 6. प्ररूप 2-क का अन्तःस्थापन.--उक्त नियमों के प्ररूप-2 के पश्चात्‌ निम्नलिखित नया प्ररूप-2क अन्तःस्थापित किया जाएगा,-

प्ररूप-2 क

[ नियम 9(1) देखें ]

वार्डों के परिसीमन का अन्तिम प्रकाशन का नोटिस

जनसाधारण की सूचना के लिए एतद्‌द्वारा यह अधिसूचित किया जाता है कि नगरपालिका परिषद्‌/नगर पंचायत..............................को वार्डों में विभाजित करने के तारीख...............को प्रकाशित प्रारूप प्रस्ताव पर प्राप्त आक्षेपों और अपीलों पर पारित आदेश को, हिमाचल प्रदेश नगरपालिका निर्वाचन नियम, 2015 के अनुसार सम्मिलित कर दिया गया है और नगरपालिका परिषद/नगर पंचायत.....................के वार्डों के प्रत्येक निर्वाचन क्षेत्र की परिभाषित सीमाएं एतद्‌द्वारा अंतिम रूप से प्रकाशित की जाती है।

उपायुक्त

जिला.........................................

(नाम एवं मोहर) स्थान....................

तारीख..................

आदेश द्वारा,

देवेश कुमार, प्रधान सचिव( शहरी विकास)।

---------

[Authoritative English Text of this Department's notification number UD-A(3)-15/2024-Rules,

dated 22nd August, 2025 as required under Article 348 (3) of the Constitution of India].

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTIFICATION

Shimla-171 002, the 22nd August, 2025

No. UD-A(3)-15/2024-Rules.—In exercise of powers conferred by section 279 and 304 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1994 (Act No. 13 of 1994), the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in consultation with State Election Commission, is pleased to propose the following amendments in Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015 and the same are hereby published in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette) Himachal Pradesh, for information of the general public as required under sub- section (5) of the section 279 of the Act ibid;

If any interested person(s) likely to be affected by these draft rules, has any objection(s) or suggestion(s) with regard to these rules, he/she may send the same to the Principal Secretary,4912 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 Urban Development to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh within a period of 10 days from the date of publication of the said rules in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette), Himachal Pradesh;

The objection(s) or suggestion(s) if any, received within the stipulated period shall be taken into consideration by the State Government before finalizing the said draft rules, namely:—

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election (Amendment) Rules, 2025.

(2) These rules shall come into force from the date of publication in Rajpatra (e-Gazette), Himachal Pradesh.

2. Amendment of Rule 9.—In sub-rule (1) of Rule 9 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules), after the words "affixing a copy of the same", the words, figures and signs "in Form 2A" shall be added.

3. Amendment of Rule 27.—In sub-rule (1) of rule 27 of the said rules, for the existing proviso, following proviso shall be substituted.—

" Provided that an application under this rule shall not be submitted after the Notification of Election Programme under rule 35 of these rules."

4. Amendment of Rule 28.—In sub-rule (1) of rule 28 of the said rules, for the existing proviso, following proviso shall be substituted:—

"Provided that an application under this rule shall not be submitted after the Notification of Election Programme under rule 35 of these rules".

5. Amendment of Rule 88.—In Rule 88 of the said rules,—

(i) in the heading, after the word "elected", the word "or nominated" shall be added.

(ii) after sub-rule (1), following new proviso shall be inserted,—

"Provided that if nomination of a member is notified in the Rajpatra (e-Gazette), Himachal Pradesh he shall be subscribed an oath or affirmation of his allegiance to the Constitution of India in accordance with procedure prescribed under sub- rule (1) as the case may be.

6. Insertion of Form-2A.—In the said rules after Form-2, following new 'Form-2A' shall be inserted,—

FORM-2A

[See rule 9 (1)]

NOTICE OF FINAL PUBLICATION OF DELIMITATION OF WARDS

It is hereby notified for the information of general public that the order passed on the objections and appeals to the draft proposal published on dated......................for dividing Municipal Council / Nagar Panchayat........................................into wards has been incorporated in the proposal in accordance with HP Municipal Election Rules, 2015 and wards of Municipal4913 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 Council /Nagar Panchayat.......................................defining the limit of each constituency is hereby published finally.

Deputy Commissioner

District............................

( NAME & SEAL) Place................................

Date.................................

By order,

DEVESH KUMAR, Pr. Secretary (UD).

___________

In the Court of Executive Magistrate/Naib-Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhoranj,

District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Ms. Bimla Devi d/o Sh. Rupnu Ram, r/o Village Rohwin, P.O. Dhirwin, Tehsil Bhoranj, .. Applicant. District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Notice to the General Public:

As per Office Letter No. HFW-HMR (ST-B & D) Del. 2024/1-13579, dated 16-06-2025 of District Registrar Birth and Death Hamirpur, the application of Ms. Bimla Devi d/o Sh. Rupnu Ram, r/o Village Rohwin, P.O. Dhirwin, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) was received in this Office alongwith the relevent records and affidavit. In which it is mentioned that she was born on 30-12-1958 however, the registration of the said birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Rohwin. The applicant now wants to get the above mentioned date of birth registered in Gram Panchayat Rohwin.

Therefore, through this notice the general public is intimated that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of the date of birth of Ms. Bimla Devi d/o Sh. Rupnu Ram, r/o Village Rohwin, P.O. Dhirwin, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) as 30-12-1958 in the records of Gram Panchayat Rohwin, he/she can present his/her objection by appearing in this court till 12-09-2025. In case of non-appearance, unilateral action will be implemented and further action will be taken.

Seal.

Sd/-

Executive Magistrate,

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

____________

In the Court of Executive Magistrate/Naib-Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhoranj,

District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Ms. Jamida Bibi d/o Sh. Nasru Deen, r/o Village Tikker Kharwarian, P.O. Kharwar, Tehsil .. Applicant. Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969. Notice to the General Public:

As per office Letter No. HFW-HMR (ST-B & D) Del. 2024/1-16700, dated 24-07-2025 of District Registrar Birth and Death Hamirpur, the application of Ms. Jamida Bibi d/o Sh. Nasru Deen, r/o Village Tikker Kharwarian, P.O. Kharwar, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) was received in this Office alongwith the relevent records and affidavit. In which it is mentioned that she was born on 15-07-1962 however, the registration of the said birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Kharwar. The applicant now wants to get the above mentioned date of birth registered in Gram Panchayat Kharwar.

Therefore, through this notice the general public is intimated that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of the date of birth of Ms. Jamida Bibi d/o Sh. Nasru Deen, r/o Village Tikker Kharwarian, P.O. Kharwar, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) as 15-07-1962 in the records of Gram Panchayat Kharwar, he/she can present his/her objection by appearing in this court till 12-09-2025. In case of non-appearance, unilateral action will be implemented and further action will be taken.

Issued today dated 02-08-2025 under my signature and seal of this court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Executive Magistrate,

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

________

In the Court of Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar), Bhoranj,

District Hamirpur (H.P.)

In the matter of :

Ranjna Devi d/o Amar Singh, r/o Village Rahwin, P.O. Dhirwin, Tehsil Bhoranj, District . . Applicant. Hamirpur (H.P.)4915 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 Versus General Public

. .Respondent.

Application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969 and Section 9(3) of H.P.

Birth and Death Registration Rules, 2003.

Whereas, Ranjna Devi d/o Amar Singh, r/o Village Rahwin, P.O. Dhirwin, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth & Death Registration Act, 1969 and Section 9(3) of H.P. Birth & Death Registration Rules, 2003 alongwith affidavits and other relevant documents for entering date of birth 20-04-1959 which could not be registered in record of Gram Panchayat Sundhrian.

Now, therefore by this proclamation, the general public is hereby informed that any person having any objection(s) for the registration of delayed date of birthof Ranjna Devi d/o Amar Singh may submit their objections in writing or appear in person in this court on or before 29-08-2025 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Seal.

Sd/-

Executive Magistrate,

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

________

In the Court of Executive Magistrate/Naib-Tehsildar, Tehsil Bhoranj,

District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Ms. Savitri Devi d/o Sh. Lal Singh, r/o Village Khuthrin, P.O. Ladraur, Tehsil Bhoranj, .. Applicant. District Hamirpur (H.P.)

Versus

General Public

. .Respondent.

Application u/s 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969.

Notice to the General Public:

As per office Letter No. HFW-HMR (ST-B & D) Del. 2024/1-13583, dated 16-06-2025 of District Registrar Birth and Death Hamirpur, the application of Ms. Savitri Devi d/o Sh. Lal Singh, r/o Village Khuthrin, P.O. Ladraur, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) was received in this Office alongwith the relevent records and affidavit. In which it is mentioned that she was born on 01-01-1948 however, the registration of the said birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Jharlog. The applicant now wants to get the above mentioned date of birth registered in Gram Panchayat Jharlog.

Therefore, through this notice the general public is intimated that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of the date birth of Ms. Savitri Devi d/o Sh. Lal Singh, r/o Village Khuthrin, P.O. Ladraur, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.) as 01-01-1948 in the records of Gram Panchayat Jharlog, he/she can present his/her objection by appearing in this court till4916 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 12-09-2025. In case of non-appearance, unilateral action will be implemented and further action will be taken.

Issued today dated 02-08-2025 under my signature and seal of this court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Executive Magistrate,

Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

_____________

कार्यालय कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)

श्रीमती विद्‌या देवी पुत्री कर्म सिंह, निवासी टीका चम्बोह, डाकघर चम्बोह, तहसील भोरंज, जिला . . प्रार्थिया। हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। विषय.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

अतिरिक्त जिला रजिस्ट्रार जन्म एवं मृत्यु हमीरपुर के कार्यालय पत्र संख्या HFW-HMR (ST B & D) Del.-2024/1-2643, दिनांक 03-01-2025 अनुसार श्रीमती विद्‌या देवी पुत्री कर्म सिंह, निवासी टीका चम्बोह, डाकघर चम्बोह, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) का आवेदन समस्त रिकॉर्ड व शपथ-पत्र सहित इस कार्यालय में प्राप्त हुआ। जिसमें उल्लेख है कि उसका जन्म दिनांक 10-12-1961 को हुआ है। परन्तु किसी कारणवश ग्राम पंचायत चम्बोह के रिकॉर्ड में उक्त जन्म का पंजीकरण न हो सका। प्रार्थिया अब जन्म दिनांक उपरोक्त को ग्राम पंचायत चम्बोह में दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।

अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि श्रीमती विद्‌या देवी पुत्री कर्म सिंह, निवासी टीका चम्बोह, डाकघर चम्बोह, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) की जन्म तिथि 10-12-1961 को ग्राम पंचायत चम्बोह के रिकॉर्ड में दर्ज करवाने बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 12-09-2025 तक असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर न्यायालय होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। हाजिर न आने कि सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर आगामी कार्यवाही की जाएगी। उसके बाद का उजर जेर समायत न होगा।

आज दिनांक 02-08-2025 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

हस्ताक्षरित/- मोहर। कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)।4917 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 कार्यालय कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)

श्रीमती वीना देवी पुत्री ज्ञानू, निवासी टीका सप्लुही, डाकघर नगरोटा गजियां, तहसील भोरंज, जिला . . प्रार्थिया। हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। विषय.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

अतिरिक्त जिला रजिस्ट्रार जन्म एवं मृत्यु हमीरपुर के कार्यालय पत्र संख्या HFW-HMR (ST B & D) Del.-2024/2-15832, दिनांक 15-07-2025 अनुसार श्रीमती वीना देवी पुत्री ज्ञानू, निवासी टीका सप्लुही, डाकघर नगरोटा गजियां, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) का आवेदन समस्त रिकॉर्ड व शपथ-पत्र सहित इस कार्यालय में प्राप्त हुआ। जिसमें उल्लेख है कि उसका जन्म दिनांक 10-04-1973 को हुआ है। परन्तु किसी कारणवश ग्राम पंचायत धिरड के रिकॉर्ड में उक्त जन्म का पंजीकरण न हो सका। प्रार्थिया अब जन्म दिनांक उपरोक्त को ग्राम पंचायत धिरड में दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।

अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि श्रीमती वीना देवी पुत्री ज्ञानू, निवासी टीका सप्लुही, डाकघर नगरोटा गजियां, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) की जन्म तिथि 10-04-1973 को ग्राम पंचायत धिरड के रिकॉर्ड में दर्ज करवाने बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 12-09-2025 तक असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर न्यायालय होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। हाजिर न आने कि सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर आगामी कार्यवाही की जाएगी। उसके बाद का उजर जेर समायत न होगा।

आज दिनांक 02-08-2025 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर। हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)।

--------

कार्यालय कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)

इश्तहार/आम जनता।

श्रीमती शकुन्तला देवी पुत्री बक्शी राम, गांव भोटी, डाकघर तरक्वाडी, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर . . प्रार्थिया। (हि0प्र0)

बनाम

आम जनता

. . प्रतिवादी। विषय.--दरख्वास्त जेर धारा 13(3) जन्म एवं मृत्यु पंजीकरण अधिनियम, 1969.

4918 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 अतिरिक्त जिला रजिस्ट्रार जन्म एवं मृत्यु हमीरपुर के कार्यालय पत्र संख्या HFW-HMR (ST B & D) Del.-2024/1-12120, दिनांक 26-05-2025 अनुसार श्रीमती शकुन्तला देवी पुत्री बक्शी राम, गांव भोटी, डाकघर तरक्वाडी, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) का आवेदन समस्त रिकॉर्ड व शपथ-पत्र सहित इस कार्यालय में प्राप्त हुआ, जिसमें उल्लेख है कि उसका जन्म दिनांक 07-10-1953 को हुआ है। परन्तु किसी कारणवश ग्राम पंचायत भोरंज के रिकॉर्ड में उक्त जन्म का पंजीकरण न हो सका। प्रार्थिया अब जन्म दिनांक उपरोक्त को ग्राम पंचायत भोरंज में दर्ज करवाना चाहती है।

अतः इस इश्तहार द्वारा आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि श्रीमती शकुन्तला देवी पुत्री बक्शी राम, गांव भोटी, डाकघर तरक्वाडी, तहसील भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0) की जन्म तिथि 07-10-1953 को ग्राम पंचायत भोरंज के रिकॉर्ड में दर्ज करवाने बारे किसी को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक 12-09-2025 तक असालतन/वकालतन हाजिर न्यायालय होकर अपना उजर/एतराज पेश कर सकता है। हाजिर न आने कि सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर आगामी कार्यवाही की जाएगी। उसके बाद का उजर जेर समायत न होगा।

आज दिनांक 02-08-2025 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

हस्ताक्षरित/- मोहर। कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी एवं नायब तहसीलदार, भोरंज, जिला हमीरपुर (हि0प्र0)।

--------

सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, डैहर, उप-तहसील डैहर, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0)

मिसल नं0 : 11/2025

तारीख मरजुआ : 05-08-2025 मुकद्दमा शीर्षक :

श्रीमती अंजिना देवी पत्नी रत्न लाल, निवासी गांव अलसू, डाकघर डैहर, उप-तहसील डैहर, जिला मण्डी, हि0प्र0

बनाम

आम जनता

विषय.--Application for publication of Change of Name and date of Birth of applicant.

श्रीमती अंजिना देवी पत्नी रत्न लाल, निवासी गांव अलसू, डाकघर डैहर, उप-तहसील डैहर, जिला मण्डी, हि0प्र0 ने इस न्यायालय में आवेदन-पत्र इस आशय से पेश किया है कि उसका नाम व जन्म तिथि आधार कार्ड में नाम अंजना देवी तथा जन्म तिथि 05-09-1977 परिवार नकल में अंजू देवी नाम गलत दर्ज किया गया है, परन्तु राजस्व अभिलेख हिमाचली प्रमाण-पत्र तथा जन्म प्रमाण-पत्र में अंजिना देवी दर्ज है जोकि सही है, जिससे उसे कठिनाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। इसलिए उसका नाम अंजना देवी के स्थान पर अंजिना देवी तथा आधार कार्ड में जन्म तिथि 05-09-1977 के स्थान पर 03-11-1976 दर्ज कर दिया जावे।

अतः इस इश्तहार मुश्त्री मुनादी के माध्यम से आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि उक्त नाम व जन्म तिथि की दुरुस्ती बारे किसी भी व्यक्ति को कोई उजर/एतराज हो तो वह दिनांक4919 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 08-09-2025 को असालतन या वकालतन अदालत हजा में हाजिर आकर अपना उजर/एतराज लिखित या मौखिक रूप में पेश कर सकते हैं। हाजिर न आने की सूरत में एकतरफा कार्यवाही अमल में लाई जाकर प्रार्थी के पक्ष में नाम व जन्म तिथि दुरुस्ती के आदेश पारित कर दिये जाएंगे।

आज दिनांक 05-08-2025 को मेरे हस्ताक्षर व मोहर अदालत से जारी हुआ।

मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- सहायक समाहर्ता द्वितीय श्रेणी, डैहर, जिला मण्डी (हि0प्र0)।

-----------

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar,

District Mandi (H. P.)

In the matter of :

1. Smt. Susheela d/o Sh. Sonam Dawa, r/o Village & P.O. Gondhla, Tehsil Keylong, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. (Age 30 years) presenetly residing at H. No. 74/8 Ambedkar Nagar, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi (H.P.).

2. Sh. Sushil s/o Sh. Pal, r/o H. No. 74/8 Ambedkar Nagar, P.O. Bhojpur, Tehsil . . Applicants.

Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) (Age 31 years)

Versus

General Public . . Respondent.

Subject.—Application for the registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act. Susheela and Sushil have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on dated 25-07-2024 and they are living together as husband and wife since then, hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 05-09-2025. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Issued today on 02-08-2025 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sundernagar, District Mandi (H.P.).

In the Court of Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sundernagar,

District Mandi (H. P.)

In the matter of :

1. Smt. Saroj Kumari d/o Sh. Daya Ram, r/o Village & Post Office Beri, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. (Age 63 years).

2. Sh. Attar Singh s/o Sh. Dharam Singh, r/o H. No. 88/10, Village Handeti, P.O. Sundernagar, Tehsil Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) (Age 69 years) . . Applicants.

Versus

General Public . . Respondent.

Subject.—Application for the registration of marriage under section 15 of Special Marriage Act. Saroj Kumari and Attar Singh have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of undersigned under section 15 of Special Marriage Act, 1954 that they have solemnized their marriage according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on dated 22-02-1981 and they are living together as husband and wife since then, hence, their marriage may be registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954.

Therefore, the general public is hereby informed through this notice that any person who has any objection regarding this marriage, can file the objection personally or in writing before this court on or before 03-09-2025. After that no objection will be entertained and marriage will be registered.

Issued today on 02-08-2025 under my hand and seal of the court.

Seal.

Sd/-

Marriage Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Sundernagar, District Mandi (H.P.).

_____________

Before Sh. Inder Kumar, Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar,

Majra, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 23/2025 28-07-2025 Pending for 28-08-2025 Sh. Ram Kumar son of Sh. Amar Singh, r/o Village Bharapur, P.O. Dhaulakuan, Sub-Tehsil . .Applicant. Majra, Distt. Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

. .Respondents.

Sh. Ram Kumar son of Sh. Amar Singh, r/o Village Bharapur, P.O. Dhaulakuan, Sub-Tehsil Majra, Distt. Sirmaur H.P. has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that he was born on 12-02-1964 at Village Bharapur, P.O. Dhaulakuan, Sub-Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) but his date of birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Dhaulakuan, Sub-Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) within stipulated period.

Hence he prayed for passing necessary orders to the Secretary, Birth & Death Gram Panchayat Dhaulakuan, Sub-Tehsil Majra for entering the same in the birth and death records.

Therefore, by this proclamation the general publc is hereby informed that any person having any objections for the registration of delayed date of birth of Ram Kumar s/o Amar Singh & Smt. Kartari Devi, may submit their objections in writing in this court on or before 28-08-2025 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 28th day of July, 2025.

Seal.

Sd/- (INDER KUMAR), Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar, Majra, District Sirmaur H.P.

_________

Before Sh. Inder Kumar, Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar,

Majra, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 26/2025 29-07-2025 Pending for 29-08-2025 Sh. Asjad Kabir Taban son of Sh. Kabirudeen Faran, r/o V.P.O. Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil . .Applicant. Majra, Distt. Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

. .Respondents.

Application under section 13(3) of birth and death Registration Act, 1969.

Sh. Asjad Kabir Taban son of Sh. Kabirudeen Faran, r/o V.P.O. Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra, Distt. Sirmaur, H.P. has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that he was born on 14-09-1987 at V.P.O. Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) but her date of birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Misserwala, Sub- Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) within stipulated period.

Hence she prayed for passing necessary orders to the Secretary, Birth & Death Gram Panchayat Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra for entering the same in the birth and death records.

Therefore, by this proclamation the general publc is hereby informed that any person having any objections for the registration of delayed date of birth of Asjad Kabir Taban son of Sh. Kabirudeen Faran & Smt. Mushtri Khanam may submit their objections in writing in this court on or before 29-08-2025 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Given under my hand and seal of the court on this 29th day of July, 2025.

Seal.

Sd/- (INDER KUMAR), Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar, Majra, District Sirmaur H.P.

_________

Before Sh. Inder Kumar, Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar,

Majra, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

Case No. Date of Institution Date of Decision 27/2025 29-07-2025 Pending for 29-08-2025 Smt. Asad Kabir Quaan son of Mohd. Kabiruddin Faran Mazahiri, r/o V.P.O. Misserwala, . .Applicant. Sub-Tehsil Majra, Distt. Sirmaur, H.P.

Versus

General Public

. .Respondents.

Application under section 13(3) of birth and death Registration Act, 1969.

Smt. Asad Kabir Quaan son of Mohd. Kabiruddin Faran Mazahiri, r/o V.P.O. Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra, Distt. Sirmaur H.P. has moved an application before the undersigned under section 13(3) of Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969 alongwith affidavits and other documents stating therein that he was born on 25-11-1983 at V.P.O. Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) but his date of birth could not be registered in the records of Gram Panchayat Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra, District Sirmaur (H.P.) within stipulated period.

Hence she prayed for passing necessary orders to the Secretary, Birth & Death Gram Panchayat Misserwala, Sub-Tehsil Majra for entering the same in the birth and death records.

Therefore, by this proclamation the general publc is hereby informed that any person having any objections for the registration of delayed date of birth of Asad Kabir Quaan son of Mohd. Kabiruddin Faran Mazahiri & Smt. Mushtari Khanam may submit their objections in writing in this court on or before 29-08-2025 at 10.00 A.M., failing which no objection will be entertained after expiry of date.

Seal.

Sd/- (INDER KUMAR), Executive Magistrate-cum-Naib Tehsildar, Majra, District Sirmaur H.P.

_________

In the Court of Sh. Rishabh Sharma, Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Paonta Sahib,

District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

In the matter of :

Panchi Ram s/o Motiram, r/o Village Shamyala, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, . . Applicant. Himachal Pradesh

Versus

General Public

. . Respondent.

Subject.—Application for correction of name of applicant's father in pariwar register of applicant.

Whereas, Panchi Ram s/o Motiram, r/o Village Shamyala, Tehsil Paonta Sahib has filed an application alongwith copy of his Aadhar Card, Pariwar Register and revenue record in the court of the undersigned to correct his father's name as Moti Ram in place of Meena in his pariwar register of Gram Panchayat Danda, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

Now, therefore, objections are invited from the general public that if anyone has any objection regarding to correct the name of applicant's father as Moti Ram in place of Meena in his Gram Panchayat record of Village Danda, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H.P.) then they should appear before the court of undersigned on or before 02-09-2025, either personally or through their authorized agent.

In the event of their failure to do so, it would be deemed that there are no objections and order shall be passed ex-parte without affording any further opportunity of being heard.

Issued under my hand and seal of the court on this 02-08-2025.

Seal.

Sd/-

(RISHABH SHARMA), Tehsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

_________

In the Court of Sh. Sunil Kumar, H.P.A.S., Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sangrah,

District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh

1. Sh. Sandeep Kumar s/o Late Sh. Mohi Ram, r/o Village Dana, Post Office Barag, Tehsil Shree Renuka Ji at Sangrah, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

2. Mrs. Priyanka d/o Gopal Singh, r/o Village Ghaton, Tehsil Shree Renuka Ji at Sangarh, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh.

Versus

General Public

Subject.— Registration of Marriage under section 8(4) of the H.P. Registration of Marriage

Act, 1996.

Sh. Sandeep Kumar s/o Late Sh. Mohi Ram, r/o Village Dana, Post Office Barag, Tehsil Shree Renuka Ji at Sangrah, District Sirmaur (H.P.) and Mrs. Priyanka, d/o Gopal Singh, r/o Village Ghaton, Tehsil Shree Renuka Ji at Sangarh, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh have filed an application alongwith affidavits in the court of the undersigned stating therein that they have solemnized their marriage on 12-07-2023 but due to some inadvertent reasons they could not get their marriage registered.

Therefore, objections are hereby invited from the General Pubic through this notice, that if anyone has any objection regarding registration of this marriage, they can file their objections personally or in writing before the court of undersigned on or before 06-09-2025. After that no objection shall be entertained and marriage will be registered accordingly

Issued under my hand and seal of the court today on 7th August, 2025.

Seal.

Sd/- SUNIL KUMAR (HPAS), Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sangrah, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

____________

ब अदालत श्री अभिषेक भास्कर कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी जयसिंहपुर, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0प्र0)

मु0 नं0 : 73/तह/2025 किस्म मुकद्दमा : जन्म पंजीकरण तारीख पेशी : 23-08-2025 नविन्द्र कुमार पुत्र त्रिलोक चन्द, गांव कच्छाल जग्गीयां, डाकघर जयसिंहपुर, तहसील जयसिंहपुर, . . प्रार्थी। जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0।

बनाम

. . प्रतिवादीगण। आम जनता

विषय.-- इश्तहार अखबारी बराये जन्म दर्ज करने बारे।

इश्तहार मुश्त्री मुनादी।

नविन्द्र कुमार पुत्र त्रिलोक चन्द, गांव कच्छाल जग्गीयां, डाकघर जयसिंहपुर, तहसील जयसिंहपुर, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 ने स्वयं हाजिर होकर प्रार्थना-पत्र मय ब्यान हल्फी पेश किया व आवेदन किया है कि मेरी पुत्री नव्या का जन्म दिनांक 25-05-2013 कोे गांव कच्छाल जग्गीयां, डाकघर जयसिंहपुर, ग्राम पंचायत4925 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 जयसिंहपुर व तहसील जयसिंहपुर, जिला कांगड़ा में हुआ है। इस सन्दर्भ में प्रार्थी ने अपना शपथ-पत्र भी संलग्न किया है, परन्तु अज्ञानतावश प्रार्थी के घरवालों ने जन्म पंजीकरण स्थानीय ग्राम पंचायत जयसिंहपुर के अभिलेख में दर्ज न करवाया है। अतः प्रार्थी न्यायालय के माध्यम से अपनी पुत्री के जन्म का पंजीकरण करने का आदेश स्थानीय ग्राम पंचायत जयसिंहपुर को जारी करवाना चाहता है।

अतः प्रार्थी के आवेदन को स्वीकार करते हुए इस इश्तहार मुश्त्री मुनादी व चस्पांगी के माध्यम से प्रतिवादी आम जनता को सूचित किया जाता है कि यदि किसी व्यक्ति को उक्त नव्या पुत्री नविन्द्र कुमार, गांव कच्छाल जग्गीयां, डाकघर जयसिंहपुर, तहसील जयसिंहपुर, जिला कांगड़ा, हि0 प्र0 की जन्म तिथि 25-05-2013 के पंजीकरण बारे कोई उजर या एतराज हो तो वह असालतन या वकालतन तारीख पेशी 23-08-2025 को दोपहर 02.00 बजे हाजिर अदालत होकर अपना उजर या एतराज पेश कर सकता है अन्यथा बाद गुजरने तारीख पेशी किसी किस्म का उजर एवं एतराज नहीं सुना जावेगा व उपरोक्त जन्म पंजीकरण करने का आदेश उप-स्थानीय पंजीकार ग्राम पंचायत सचिव जयसिंहपुर को जारी कर दिया जाएगा।

यह इश्तहार मोहर अदालत व मेरे हस्ताक्षर से आज दिनांक 04-08-2025 को जारी हुआ। मोहर।

हस्ताक्षरित/- कार्यकारी दण्डाधिकारी, जयसिंहपुर, जिला कांगड़ा (हि0प्र0)।

--------

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Vishal s/o Bal Krishan, r/o Ward No. 12, Upper Barol, P.O. Dari, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra (H.P.) declare that I have changed my name from Vishal to Vishal Katnoria. Concerned note it.

VISHAL

s/o Bal Krishan,

r/o Ward No. 12, Upper Barol, P.O. Dari,

Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra (H.P.).

____________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Naina Devi d/o Sh. Daya Nand w/o Anil Kumar age 42 years, r/o Village Manikaran, P.O. Manikaran, Sub-Tehsil Jari, District Kullu (H.P.) do hereby solemnly and declare on oath as my all relevant documents include Pan Card or records, my name is recorded as Shanta Devi d/o Jai Nand, whereas now I have changed my name from Shanta Devi d/o Jai Nand to Naina Devi d/o Sh. Daya Nand, w/o Sh. Anil Kumar. Today onwards my name be considered as Naina Devi w/o Anil Kumar for all purposes. Please consider note that.

NAINA DEVI

d/o Sh. Daya Nand

w/o Anil Kumar

r/o Village Manikaran, P.O. Manikaran,

Sub-Tehsil Jari, District Kullu (H.P.).

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Dazy Bala w/o Ajay Singh, V.P.O. Indora, District Kangra (H.P.) request the change of my name from Daizy Bala to Dazy Bala as per affidavit before Tehsildar Indora 24-07-2025.

DAZY BALA

w/o Ajay Singh,

V.P.O. Indora,

District Kangra (H.P.).

____________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Vishal Thakur (New Name) s/o Sh. Hukmi Ram, r/o Village Gummat, P.O. Koti-Bounch, Tehsil Shillai, Koti (179), District Sirmaur (H.P.)-173 027 declare that I have changed my name from Vishal (Previous Name) to Vishal Thakur (New Name). All concerned please may note.

VISHAL THAKUR

s/o Sh. Hukmi Ram,

r/o Village Gummat, P.O. Koti-Bounch,

Tehsil Shillai, Koti (179), District Sirmaur (H.P.)-173 027.

____________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Monu Devi w/o Anil Kumar, Village Wanda, P.O. & Tehsil Jhandutta, District Bilaspur (H.P.) declare that in my Aadhar Card my name is wrongly recorded as Monika. My correct name is Monu Devi. All concerned note.

MONU DEVI

w/o Anil Kumar,

Village Wanda,

P.O. & Tehsil Jhandutta, District Bilaspur (H.P.).

____________

CORRECTION OF NAME

I, Vishaw Nath s/o Hari Krishan, r/o V.P.O. Behal, Tehsil Shri Naina Devi Ji, District Bilaspur (H.P.) declare that my daughter's name wrongly entered as Shirsti in her Aadhar card No. 8163 5388 3015 whereas correct name is Srishti Sharma. All concerned note.

VISHAW NATH

s/o Hari Krishan,

r/o V.P.O. Behal,

Tehsil Shri Naina Devi Ji, District Bilaspur (H.P.).

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Rumel Singh s/o Ram Singh, r/o V.P.O. Sakri, Tehsil Haripur, District Kangra (H.P.) declare that I have changed my name from Rumel Singh to Rumal Singh Saraich.

RUMEL SINGH

s/o Ram Singh,

r/o V.P.O. Sakri,

Tehsil Haripur, District Kangra (H.P.).

____________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Kiran Mehta w/o Sh. Mohar Singh Mehta, r/o Lata Niwas Sangti, Sanjauli, Shimla- (H.P.)-171 006 hereby declare that I have changed my name from Kirna Thakur (Old Name) to Kiran Mehta (New Name). All concerned please may note.

KIRAN MEHTA

w/o Sh. Mohar Singh Mehta,

r/o Lata Niwas Sangti,

Sanjauli, Shimla (H.P.)-171 006.

____________

CORRECTION OF NAME

I, Sar Devi w/o Sh. Karam Singh, r/o Village Mohin, P.O. Mohin, Tehsil Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (H.P.) declare that I have changed my name from Saro Devi to Sar Devi for all purposes in future. Please note.

SAR DEVI

w/o Sh. Karam Singh,

r/o Village Mohin, P.O. Mohin,

Tehsil Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (H.P.).

____________

CORRECTION OF NAME

I, Anju Bala w/o Sh. Babloo Kumar, r/o V.P.O. Yol Tika Lehsar, P.O. Yol, Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra (H.P.) declare that my daughter's name in her School record is wrongly entered as Palvi Saphiya, whereas, her correct name is Palvi Saphia.

ANJU BALA

w/o Sh. Babloo Kumar,

r/o V.P.O. Yol Tika Lehsar, P.O. Yol,

Tehsil Dharamshala, District Kangra (H.P.).

CORRECTION OF NAME

I, Sanjeev Kumar (50), Village Rajol, P.O. Kotla, Sub-Tehsil Kotla, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra (H.P.) declare to correct my son's name from Priyanshu to Paryanshu Pathania in his Aadhar Card.

SANJEEV KUMAR

Village Rajol, P.O. Kotla,

Sub-Tehsil Kotla, Tehsil Jawali, District Kangra (H.P.).

____________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Balak Ram s/o Galava, r/o Village & P.O. Jarog, Tehsil Dadahu, Distt. Sirmaur (H.P.) declare that I (Aadhar Card No. 3573 4706 4533) have changed my name from Balku to Balak Ram. All concerned may please note.

BALAK RAM

s/o Galava,

r/o Village & P.O. Jarog,

Tehsil Dadahu, Distt. Sirmaur (H.P.).

___________

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Beetu s/o Late Sh. Dinesh Chand, r/o Village Palgani, P.O. Birla, Tehsil Dadahu, District Sirmaur (H.P.) declare that I have changed my name from Beetu to Vidu Kumar. All concerned please may note.

BEETU

s/o Late Sh. Dinesh Chand,

r/o Village Palgani, P.O. Birla,

Tehsil Dadahu, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

______________

CORRECTION OF NAME

I, Sheetu Dhiman w/o Dharam Pal Dhiman, V.P.O. Bhawarna, Tehsil Palampur, Distt. Kangra (H.P.) declare that I have changed my son's name from Suryansh to Suryansh Dhiman. Suryansh and Suryansh Dhiman is one and same boy. All note it.

SHEETU DHIMAN

w/o Dharam Pal Dhiman,

V.P.O. Bhawarna,

Tehsil Palampur, Distt. Kangra (H.P.).

CHANGE OF NAME

I, Pritam Singh s/o Lt. Shri Chuhi Ram, r/o Village Rajyon Malana, P.O. Sarahan, Tehsil Pachhad, District Sirmaur (H.P.) hereby declare that grandson Viren Thakur's name is incorrectly mentioned as Viran Thakur in his Aadhar card No. 4632 5504 2727. I request that the same be corrected to Viren Thakur.

PRITAM SINGH

s/o Lt. Shri Chuhi Ram

r/o Village Rajyon Malana, P.O. Sarahan,

Tehsil Pachhad, District Sirmaur (H.P.).

___________

नाम परिवर्तन

मैं, अंजना देवी पत्नी तेजा सिंह, निवासी गांव शेउगी, डाकघर तांदी, उप-तहसील निथर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0प्र0 हल्फन ब्यान करती हूं कि मेरी पुत्री एंजल ठाकुर के नाम की स्पेलिंग स्कूल और अन्य रिकार्ड में Anjal Thakur दर्ज है, जो सही है, जबकि आधार कार्ड में गलती से Angel दर्ज हो गई है, जिसे आधार कार्ड में Anjal Thakur अपडेट कर दिया जाए। जो सर्वदा मान्य होगी।

अंजना देवी पत्नी तेजा सिंह, निवासी गांव शेउगी, डाकघर तांदी,

उप-तहसील निथर, जिला कुल्लू, हि0प्र0।4930 राजपत्र, हिमाचल प्रदेश, 22 अगस्त, 2025/31 श्रावण, 1947 नियन्त्रक, मुद्रण तथा लेखन सामग्री, हिमाचल प्रदेश, शिमला-5 द्वारा मुद्रित तथा प्रकाशित इलेक्ट्रॉनिक हस्ताक्षरित राजपत्र, वैबसाइट http://rajpatrahimachal.nic.in पर उपलब्ध है एवम्‌ ऑनलाइन सत्यापित किया जा सकता है।