-1-711/2014-426 (HRMS 2 (
(W.P.(S) No.-5608/2012)
"Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of documents available on record, it appears that the enquiry report was not served upon the petitioner before imposing impugned punishment, which caused serious prejudice to the petitioner and for that he is not able to reply suitably. Furthermore, provisions of the Civil Services (C.C. & A) Rules has not been complied with.
The appellate authority also did not take into consideration of these facts.
For the reasons aforesaid, the impugned order of punishment, the impugned order of punishment dated 05.07.2011 as also appellate order dated 28.04.2012 is hereby quashed and set aside.
However, it is open to the respondents to proceed for a de novo enquiry, if so legally advised, but after following the principles of natural justice and affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of." (
3
| Sr No. | Employee Name G.P.F. No. | Decision of the Competent authority |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | SATYA PRAKASH JHK/JAS/89 |
BHR/BAS/2972