5/1-496/2014 2914-- , 000 ( 834/03),
, , , , 368, 26.03.2015 '' ,
,
630825.07.2015
230, 08.05.2015 2 16.09.2016 , 0- W.P.(S) No.3915/2019 ,
28.05.2020,
"From the aforesaid discussions and from perusal of documents and by carefully examining the rival submission of the parties and from perusal of entire records, I hold that the enquiry conducted against the petitioner was improper and in violation of the principles of natural justice.
Since petitioner has already been considered for promotion but a sealed cover procedure has been adopted, I hereby direct the respondents to open the seal cover and consider case of the petitioner for promotion, if he is otherwise found eligible and there be no other legal impediment, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
As a sequel of the aforesaid rules, guidelines, legal proposition and judicial pronouncement, I hereby quash and set aside the impugned order of punishment of Censure issued vide Memo No-287 dated 12.01.2016 as also the appellate order issued vide Memo No-8017 dated 16.09.2016 and further direct the respondents to pay admissible consequential benefits to the petitioner on being found eligible etc., in accordance with law.
This writ petition is accordingly allowed with aforesaid order and direction."
W.P.(S) No. 3915/2019