Servants of Knowledge
Jharkhand Gazette · Government of Jharkhand

Jharkhand Gazette, No. 387, 15 September 2020

Published 15 September 2020

Type
Extra Ordinary
Gazette no.
387
Identifier
in.gazette.jharkhand.2020-09-15.387
Languages
English, Hindi

click here for IIIF manifest

,

This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The crime committed by convict is murder of a four year old child which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. Further the convicing court has specifically opined that convict has murdered an innocent girl aged about 2 years which is most heinous crime. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed murder and the body was hidden with a view to destroy evidence evidence which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing innocent child. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "The crime has been committed in a very gruesome manner. Thus it is a crime against society." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed triple murder including two girls of age 3 years and 5 years which is very heinous in nature. The Board also considered the present age of the convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed murder in a premediated and brutal manner which is very heinous in nature. The board also considered the present age of the convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict was convicted under witchcraft Act for murder which is crime against society and very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed murder which is very heinous in nature. The board also considered the present age of the convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict was convicted for murder and destroying evidence which very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict raped and murdered a girl which is most heinous crime. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict raped and murdered a girl which is most heinous crime. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, including age of the convict, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict murdered 20 years old girl by rifle. There is a possibility of crime repetation. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "The convict raped a small baby girl aged about two and half years, it is serious and heinous." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous killing of a lady (crime against women). Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "from perusal of heinousness of offence convict should not be fit for premature release." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons (multiple murder). Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "He does not deserve any lenient view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons (multiple murder). Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "He does not deserve any lenient view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "He does not deserve any lenient view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "He does not deserve any lenient view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing many innocent persons. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "He does not deserve any lenient view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing own younger brother. S.P and P.O has reported that after release from prison may indulge in criminal activities. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing a Doctor for ransom which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing a Doctor for ransom which is very heinous in nature. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing three innocent people (i.e. multiple murder). Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "The convict has committed very heinous offence of murder of 03 persons including 02 females in one go, the guilt of the convict do not deserves to be considered for his premature release" Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent persons in a gruesome manner which was premediated. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent persons in a gruesome manner which was premediated. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed offence against state as he murdered the ASI of Panki Police Station in a very gruesome manner being engaged in Naxal activities. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping of innocent child of Ten years for ransom. The Board has also considered the age of convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of loot and killing innocent person. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of dacoity and naxal activities i.e. crime against society. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing two innocent persons in gruesome manner. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of ransome. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing of his innocent wife and destroying evidence. Thus it is a crime against society." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing 14 years old innocent child. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "In my opinion 1. The victim was a boy of 10 yr. of age, 2. During the kidnapping he was going to school, 3. His murder was heartbreaking moment for his parents and the whole community and 4. Releasing this type of convict will share a message of injustice to the law abiding society" Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of kidnapping and killing teenager on the allegation of having illicit relations with wife of convict. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "Rajesh Choudhary has committed the offence willingly with cruel intention, This is one of the heinous crime. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of rape, murder and destroying evidence. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of murder in a premediated manner by calling him from house and shot by pistol, which is very heinous crime. Further S.P. has reported that if released will engage in criminal activities. The Board has also considered the age of convict. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing President of Tisco Union in a premediated manner the enquiry & supervision was done by CBI. Further the convicting court has specifically submitted the report that "convict Kunal Jenna was a contractor and he does not deserve any sympathetic view." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing innocent public representative and advocate for political reasons in a premediated manner with other co-accused. The case was enquired & supervisioned by CBI. Further the convict was punished twice for prison offence. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict committed heinous offence of killing three persons (multiple murder), which is heinous in nature. Thus it is a crime against society." Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
This board has considered the opinion of the Jail Superintendent, S.P., Probation Officer as well as the concerned learned court. The convict murdered the victim with pistol in premediated manner by forcibly entering the house which is very heinous. Hence the Board after considering all the facts and reports placed upon, decided to reject the premature release of the convict.
2 3 4 5 6 7

-----------

Cite this issue. Jharkhand Gazette, Government of Jharkhand, 15 September 2020. Indian Gazettes, https://egazette.servantsofknowledge.in/details/in.gazette.jharkhand.2020-09-15.387/. Archive identifier in.gazette.jharkhand.2020-09-15.387.