, ,
5/1-558/2014 3114-- , 000 ( 637/03, , , , ,
, , , 201 09.02.2010 ''
,
4648 08
0-26/2008
,
, 0-619513.10.2010
0-6196 13.10.2010
, , , 2 ( 1781 22.09.2011 , 6762 14.11.2011
, 19.12.2011
, , , 0-947, 02.02.2012
1. ,
2. ,
3. , 02.04.2012
, 00046Resident
,
, 000
Income TaxAct, 180
,
Domicile
,
,
00046''
000,
(
3 , ,
Resident" ,
,
"In the case of Shasthi Pado Shekhar Vs. Anandi Chowdhary reported in AIR 1967 Patna at page-25, wherein it has been reiterated that the word "Resident" as used in section-46 of the CNT Act meant one having a permanent place of abode and did not include temporary or occasional residence."
,
947, 02.02.2012 Resident
, 19084648 8
,
0-3361, 26.04.2016 , .P.(S) No.- 3818/2016 (
, 23.11.2020, "As a cumulative effect of the discussions made above, the impugned order cannot be sustained in the eye of law accordingly, impugned orders dated 02.02.2012 and 26.04.2016 are quashed. The matter is remitted back to the Disciplinary Authority for taking decision afresh. As it has been submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is going to retire in the month of February, 2021, it is expected that the Disciplinary Authority will take a fresh decision taking into account that the petitioner is going to retire in the month of February, 2021.
The writ petition stands allowed and disposed of."
, .P.(S) No. 3818/2016-Ram Kumar Mandal Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. 23.11.20204 ( ( 0-947, 02.02.2012,0-3361, 26.04.2016, , ( 43(
, 00, 000,
,
13.10.2010 01.12.2012
, 000 , 000, , , , , , ,
,
,