Karnataka Gazette, Part Part-E, 12 November 2009

click here for IIIF manifest

KA / BG - GPO/ 2515 /WPP-47/ 2009 - 2011

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯಪತ್ರ

ಅಧಿಕೃತವಾಗಿ ಪ ್ರಕಟಿಸಲಾದುದು

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಸೋಮವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 2, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 11, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 990 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ಚಿತ ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಚಿತ ್ರದುರ್ಗ

ಚುನಾವಣಾ ನೋಟೀಸು

ನಂ. ಚುನಾವಣೆ:ಸಿಆರ್:83/2009-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 2ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ಕೃಷಿ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆ ಸಮಿತಿಗೆ ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ಮಹಿಳಾ ಮೀಸಲು ಕೃಷಿಕ ಮತಕ್ಷೇತ್ರದಿಂದ ಪ್ರತಿನಿದಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಶ್ರೀಮತಿ ಗೌರಮ್ಮ ಇವರು ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನಕ್ಕೆ ರಾಜೀನಾಮೆ ನೀಡಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಸಮಿತಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ತೆರವಾಗಿರುವ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಉಪಚುನಾವಣೆ ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕೃಷಿ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆ ವ್ಯವಹಾರ (ನಿಯಂತ್ರಣ) ನಿಯಮಗಳು 1968ರ 7ನೇ ನಿಯಮ ಹಾಗೂ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕೃಷಿ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆ ವ್ಯವಹಾರ (ನಿಯಂತ್ರಣ) ಅದಿನಿಯಮ 1966ರ ಪ್ರಕರಣ 28 ರನ್ವಯ ಪ್ರದತ್ತವಾದ ಅದಿಕಾರವನ್ನು ಚಲಾಯಿಸಿ, ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾದಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಅಮ್ಲಾನ್ ಆದಿತ್ಯ ಬಿಸ್ವಾಸ್ ಆದ ನಾನು ಈ ಕೆಳಗೆ ಕಾಣಿಸಿದಂತೆ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮದ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿರುತ್ತೇನೆ.

ಮೇಲ್ಕಂಡ ಚುನಾವಣೆ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯು ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡಂತೆ ಇರುತ್ತದೆ.

¹. ನಾಮನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರ್, ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ರವರಿಗೆ ತಾಲ್ಲೂಕು ಕಚೇರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ದಿನಾಂಕ:16.11.2009 (ಸೋಮವಾರ)ಕ್ಕೆ ಮೀರದಂತೆ ಯಾವ ಕೆಲಸದ ದಿವಸದಲ್ಲಾದರೂ ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 11.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ ಮಧ್ಯಾಹ್ನ 3.00 ಗಂಟೆಯವರೆಗೆ ಸಲ್ಲಿಸಬಹುದು ನಿಯಮ 7(ಬಿ) ಪ್ರಕಾರ. ಹಾಗೂ ನಾಮನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಮೇಲ್ಕಂಡ ಅವದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರರ ಕಚೇರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪಡೆಯಬಹುದು.

². ನಾಮನಿರ್ದೇಶನ ಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಪರಿಶೀಲನೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರ್,ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗರವರು ತಾಲ್ಲೂಕು ಕಚೇರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ದಿನಾಂಕ:18.11.2009 (ಬುಧವಾರ) ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 11.00 ಗಂಟೆಗೆ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವರು. ನಿಯಮ 7(ಸಿ) ಪ್ರಕಾರ ³. ನಾಮ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನಗಳನ್ನು ವಾಪಾಸ್ ಪಡೆಯುವ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಸೂಚನೆಗಳನ್ನು ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರ್, ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ರವರ ಕಚೇರಿಗೆ ದಿನಾಂಕ:21.11.2009 (ಶನಿವಾರ) ಮಧ್ಯಾಹ್ನ 3.00 ಗಂಟೆಯೊಳಗೆ ತಲುಪಿಸಬಹುದು. ನಿಯಮ 7(ಡಿ) ಪ್ರಕಾರ ⁴. ಮತದಾನವು ಅವಶ್ಯಕವಿದ್ದರೆ ಮತದಾನವನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾದ ದಿನಾಂಕ:17.12.2009 (ಗುರುವಾರ) ದಂದು ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ

8.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ ಸಂಜೆ 5.00 ಗಂಟೆಯವರೆಗೆ ನಡೆಯುವುದು. ನಿಯಮ 7(ಇ) ಪ್ರಕಾರ

⁵. ಮತಪತ್ರಗಳ ಎಣಿಕೆಯು ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರ್, ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ರವರು ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿದ ಸ್ಥಳದಲ್ಲಿ ದಿನಾಂಕ:19.12.2009 (ಶನಿವಾರ) ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 8.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ ನಡೆಯುವುದು. ನಿಯಮ 7(ಎಫ್) ಪ್ರಕಾರ ⁶. ಚುನಾವಣಾ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮಗಳು ಮುಗಿಯತಕ್ಕ ಅಖೈರು ದಿನಾಂಕ:19.12.2009 (ಶನಿವಾರ)

ವಿಶೇಷ ಸೂಚನೆ:-

ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ಕೃಷಿ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ಮಾರುಕಟ್ಟೆ ಸಮಿತಿಯ ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ಮಹಿಳಾ ಮೀಸಲು ಕೃಷಿಕ ಮತಕ್ಷೇತ್ರದ ಖಾಲಿ ಇರುವ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಉಪಚುನಾವಣೆ ನಡೆಸಲು ತಹಶೀಲ್ದಾರ್,ಹೊಸದುರ್ಗ ರವರು ಚುನಾವಣಾದಿಕಾರಿಗಳಾಗಿರುತ್ತಾರೆ.

ಸ್ಥಳ : ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ದಿನಾಂಕ : 02.11.2009

ಅಮ್ಲಾನ್ ಆದಿತ್ಯ ಬಿಸ್ವಾಸ್ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾದಿಕಾರಿಗಳು, ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ 5284

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – III ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಸೋಮವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 2, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 11, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 991

ನಗರಾಬಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಸಚಿವಾಲಯ

ಅದಿಸೂಚನೆ

ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ನಅಇ 71 ನಯೋಸೇ 2009, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 31ನೇ ಅಕ್ಟೋಬರ್, 2009

ದಿನಾಂಕ 01-01-2009 ರಲ್ಲಿದ್ದಂತೆ ನಗರ ಮತ್ತು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಯೋಜನಾ ಇಲಾಖೆಯ ನಗರ ಯೋಜಕರ ಹುದ್ದೆಯ ತಾತ್ಕಾಲಿಕ ಜ್ಯೇಷ್ಟತಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ದಿನಾಂಕ 27-07-2009 ರಂದು ಹೊರಡಿಸಿ, ಸದರಿ ಪಟ್ಟಿಗೆ ಯಾವುದೇ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪಣೆಗಳು ಇದ್ದಲ್ಲಿ, ಅದಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ತಮ್ಮ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪಣೆಯನ್ನು ಅದಿಕೃತ ದಾಖಲೆಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ, ನಗರಾಬಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಇಲಾಖೆ, ವಿಕಾಸ ಸೌಧ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ರವರಿಗೆ ತಾತ್ಕಾಲಿಕ ಜ್ಯೇಷ್ಠತಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿ ಹೊರಡಿಸಿದ 15 ದಿನದೊಳಗಾಗಿ ಸಲ್ಲಿಸುವಂತೆ ಸೂಚಿಸಲಾಗಿತ್ತು.

ಸದರಿ ತಾತ್ಕಾಲಿಕ ಜೇಷ್ಟತಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಗೆ ನಿಗದಿತ ಅವದಿಯೊಳಗೆ ಹಲವಾರು ನಗರ ಯೋಜಕರುಗಳಿಂದ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪಣೆಗಳು ಸ್ವೀಕೃತವಾಗಿದ್ದು, ಸದರಿ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪಣೆಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ನಗರ ಮತ್ತು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಯೋಜನಾ ನಿರ್ದೇಶಕರ ಅಬಿಪ್ರಾಯ ಕೋರಲಾಗಿ, ನಿರ್ದೇಶಕರ ಅಬಿಪ್ರಾಯದಂತೆ ಸಹಾಯಕ ನಗರ ಯೋಜಕರುಗಳ ಜ್ಯೇಷ್ಟತೆಯನ್ನು ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಆಡಳಿತ ನ್ಯಾಯ ಮಂಡಳಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಅರ್ಜಿಯು ಇನ್ನು ಇತ್ಯರ್ಥವಾಗದೇ ಇರುವುದರಿಂದ ಈ ಹಂತದಲ್ಲಿ ಜ್ಯೇಷ್ಟತೆಯನ್ನು ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಿಸುವುದು ಸೂಕ್ತವಲ್ಲವೆಂದು ತಿಳಿಸುತ್ತಾ ದಿನಾಂಕ 01-01-2009 ರಲ್ಲಿದ್ದಂತೆ ನಗರ ಮತ್ತು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಯೋಜನಾ ಇಲಾಖೆಯ ನಗರ ಯೋಜಕರ ಅಂತಿಮ ಜೇಷ್ಟತಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಅನುಬಂಧ-1 ರಲ್ಲಿರುವಂತೆ ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ.

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯಪಾಲರ ಆದೇಶಾನುಸಾರ ಮತ್ತು ಅವರ ಹೆಸರಿನಲ್ಲಿ, ಎಸ್.ಎನ್.ಕೃಷ್ಣಕುಮಾರ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಅದೀನ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ

ನಗರಾಬಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಇಲಾಖೆ

ನಗರ ಯೋಜನಾ ಇಲಾಖೆಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ: 1-1-2009 ರಲ್ಲಿದ್ದಂತೆ ನಗರ ಯೋಜಕ ವೃಂದದ ಅಂತಿಮ ಜ್ಯೇಷ್ಠತಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿ

ಎಸ್.ಎನ್. ಕೃಷ್ಣಕುಮಾರ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಅದೀನ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ನಗರಾಬಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಇಲಾಖೆ

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 992 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯವರ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು

–

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ 1

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ನಂ. ಇಎಲ್ಎನ್(ಪಂ)ಸಿಆರ್. 20/09-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

1964ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ದೇವನಹಳ್ಳಿ ಪುರಸಭೆಯ ವಾರ್ಡ್ ನಂ. 22 ರಲ್ಲಿನ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ ಸ್ಥಾನ ಮರಣದ ಕಾರಣದಿಂದ ತೆರವಾಗಿದ್ದು, ಈ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ ಸ್ಥಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಚುನಾವಣೆ ಮೂಲಕ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು ಚುನಾವಣೆಯನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ. ಸದರಿ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ಪರಿಶಿಷ್ಟ ಜಾತಿಗೆ ಕಾಯ್ದಿರಿಸಿದೆ. ಆದುದರಿಂದ, ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ (ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ ಚುನಾವಣೆ) ನಿಯಮಗಳು 1977ರ ನಿಯಮ 8ರ ಅನುಸಾರ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಶ್ರೀ ಆರ್.ಕೆ.ರಾಜು, ಭಾ.ಆ.ಸೇ. ಆದ ನಾನು ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆ ನಡೆಸಲು ರಾಜ್ಯ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ಆಯೋಗದ ಆದೇಶ ಸಂ. ರಾಚುಅ.06 ಇಯುಬಿ 2008, ದಿನಾಂಕ 15.10.2009ರ ಆದೇಶದಂತೆ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಾಣಿಸಿದ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ.

ಜಿಲ್ಲಾದಿಕಾರಿ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಗ್ರಾಮಾಂತರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ 5287

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 993 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯವರ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ-1

(ಶಿಕಾರಿಪುರ ಪುರಸಭ

(ನಿಯಮ 8(1)ನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ)

ೆಯ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್ ಚುನಾವಣೆಗಳ ಸಂದಭ

ರ್ದಲ್ಲಿ ಉಪಯೋಗಕ್ಕಾಗಿ)

ಃ ಅದಿಸೂಚನೆ ಃ

ನಂ. ಚು(4)ಸಿಆರ್ 06( ಶಿಕಾರಿಪುರ)/08-09, ದಿನಾಂಕ 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್ 2009

1964ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅದಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪುರಸಭೆ ಶಿಕಾರಿಪುರದ ವಾರ್ಡ್ ನಂ. 4ರ ಸದಸ್ಯರು 14- ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ ಲೋಕಸಭಾ ಕ್ಷೇತ್ರದ ಸದಸ್ಯರಾಗಿ ಆಯ್ಕೆಯಾದ ಕಾರಣ, ಸದರಿ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಧಾನವು ತೆರವಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಸದರಿ ವಾರ್ಡಿನಿಂದ ಪುರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರುಗಳ ಸ್ಧಾನಗಳನ್ನು ಈ ಅದಿಸೂಚನೆಯ ಅನುಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲಾಗಿರುವ ಸದರಿ ಪುರಸಭೆ ಶಿಕಾರಿಪುರದ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ರನ್ನು ಮೇಲ್ಕಂಡ ವಾರ್ಡಿನಿಂದ ತುಂಬಲು,

ಈಗ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ನಿಯಮಗಳ 8ನೇ ನಿಯಮದ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾದಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಪಂಕಜ ಕುಮಾರ ಪಾಂಡೆ ಎಂಬ ನಾನು ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆಯ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ.

ಪಂಕಜ್ ಕುಮಾರ ಪಾಂಡೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾದಿಕಾರಿ, ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ ಶಿವಮೊಗ್ಗ

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 994 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯವರ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ-1

(ನಿಯಮ 10(1) ನೋಡಿ) ನಂ. ರಾಚು/ಸಿಆರ್/25/2009-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009 1976 ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಮುನಿಸಿಪಲ್ ಕಾರ್ಪೋರೇಷನ್ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಮಹಾನಗರ ಪಾಲಿಕೆಯ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ವಾರ್ಡಿಗೆ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಸದಸ್ಯರಾದ ಶ್ರೀ ಎಂ. ರಹಮತ್ತುಲ್ಲಾ ವಾಚ್ ಬೀಡಿ ಇವರು ನಿಧನರಾದ ಕಾರಣ ತೆರವಾಗಿರುವ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು ಉಪಚುನಾವಣೆ ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ.

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಮುನಿಸಿಪಲ್ ಕಾರ್ಪೋರೇಷನ್ (ಎಲೆಕ್ಷನ್) ನಿಯಮಗಳು 1979 ರ ನಿಯಮ 10 ರ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಕೆ.ಅಮರನಾರಾಯಣ ಆದ ನಾನು ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡಂತೆ ಉಪ ಚುನಾವಣೆಗೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ನಿಗಧಿಪಡಿಸಿರುತ್ತೇನೆ.

ಕೆ.ಅಮರನಾರಾಯಣ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ.

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 995 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯವರ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ಚಿತ ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಚಿತ ್ರದುರ್ಗ

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ-1

(ನಿಯಮ 8(1)ನೋಡಿ)

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ಸಂ: ಚುನಾವಣೆ.ಸಿ.ಆರ್.67/2009-10. ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

1) 1964ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ಹಿರಿಯೂರು ಪಟ್ಟಣದ 21ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ಪಟ್ಟಣ ಪುರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ಗೆ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ಈ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಯ ಅನುಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲಾಗಿರುವ ಸದರಿ ಪಟ್ಟಣ ಪುರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ನ 21ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ತುಂಬಿದ

2) ಶ್ರೀಮತಿ ಆರ್.ವಿಜಯಮ್ಮ ಇವರ ರಾಜೀನಾಮೆಯಿಂದಾಗಿ 21ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡಿನ ಸ್ಥಾನವು ಖಾಲಿಯಾಗಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಘೋಷಿಸಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಉಂಟಾದ ಖಾಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು, ಚುನಾವಣೆಗಳನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ, ಈಗ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ(ಸದಸ್ಯರುಗಳ ಚುನಾವಣೆ) ನಿಯಮಗಳು 1977ರ 8(1)ನೇ ನಿಯಮದ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಅಮ್ಲಾನ್ ಆದಿತ್ಯ ಬಿಸ್ವಾಸ್ ಎಂಬ ನಾನು ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆಯ ಸಂಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ ವೇಳಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಗಧಿಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ

ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ

ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಚಿತ್ರದುರ್ಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 996 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ತುಮಕೂರು

–

ಪ ್ರಪತ 1

್ರ

(ನಿಯಮ 8(1) ನೋಡಿ)

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ನಂ. ಚು(2) ವಿವ/27/09-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

1964 ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ತಿಪಟೂರು ೆಯ 31 ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ನಗರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ನ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರುಗಳ ಸ್ಥಾನಗಳನ್ನು ಈ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಯ ನಗರಸಭ ಅನುಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲಾಗಿರುವ ಸದರಿ ನಗರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ನ 31ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ತುಂಬಲು ಚುನಾವಣೆಗಳನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ,

ಈಗ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ನಿಯಮಗಳ 8ನೇ ನಿಯಮದ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಡಾ: ಸಿ. ಸೋಮಶೇಖರ, ಭಾ.ಆ.ಸೇ., ನಾನು ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆಯ ಸಂಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ ವೇಳಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ.

1) ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಪ್ರಪತ್ರ-1ಎ ರಲ್ಲಿ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ನೋಟೀಸನ್ನು

: 3-11-2009 ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸುವ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ

(ಮಂಗಳವಾರ) 2) ನಾಮಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಸಲ್ಲಿಸಲು ಕೊನೆಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 10-11-2009 (ಮಂಗಳವಾರ) 3) ನಾಮಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸುವ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 11-11-2009 (ಬುಧವಾರ) 4) ಉಮೇದುವಾರಿಕೆಗಳನ್ನು ಹಿಂತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಕೊನೆಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 13-11-2009

(ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ) 5) ಮತದಾನ ಅವಶ್ಯವಿದ್ದರೆ ಮತದಾನವನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾದ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 22-11-2009 (ಭಾನುವಾರ) 6) ಮತದಾನದ ಸಮಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ 22.11.2009 ರಂದು ಭಾನುವಾರ ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 7.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ ಸಾಯಂಕಾಲ

5.00 ಗಂಟೆಯವರೆಗೆ

7) ಮತಗಳ ಎಣಿಕೆಯು ದಿನಾಂಕ 23.11.2009 ರಂದು ಸೋಮವಾರ ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 8.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ (ತಾಲ್ಲೂಕಿನ

ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸ್ಥಳದಲ್ಲಿ)

8) ಚುನಾವಣೆಯನ್ನು ಯಾವ ದಿನಾಂಕಕ್ಕೆ ಮುಂಚೆ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯಗೊಳಿಸಬೇಕೋ ಆ : 26.11.2009 (ಗುರುವಾರ) ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ 5290

ನಗರಸಭ ೆ, ತಿಪಟೂರು

ಪ್ರಪತ್ರ-1 ರ ಅನುಬಂಧ

(ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ವಾರು ವಿವರಗಳಿಗೆ ನಗರಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಇಲಾಖೆಯ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪತ್ರ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ನಂ. ನಅಇ 88 ಎಂಎಲ್ಆರ್ 2007 (25-ಬಿ) ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ದಿನಾಂಕ 27.7.2007 ಮೇರೆಗೆ)

ಡಾ: ಸಿ. ಸೋಮಶೇಖರ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಹಾಗು ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿ, ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ತುಮಕೂರು.

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 997 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ತುಮಕೂರು

–

ಪ ್ರಪತ 1

್ರ

(ನಿಯಮ 8(1) ನೋಡಿ)

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ನಂ. ಚು(2) ವಿವ/27/09-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

1964 ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ಶಿರಾ ನಗರಸಭ ೆಯ 1 ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ನಗರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ನ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರುಗಳ ಸ್ಥಾನಗಳನ್ನು ಈ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಯ ಅನುಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲಾಗಿರುವ ಸದರಿ ನಗರಸಭಾ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲ್‌ನ 1ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನಿಂದ ತುಂಬಲು ಚುನಾವಣೆಗಳನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ,

ಈಗ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ನಿಯಮಗಳ 8ನೇ ನಿಯಮದ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ಡಾ: ಸಿ. ಸೋಮಶೇಖರ, ಭಾ.ಆ.ಸೇ., ನಾನು ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆಯ ಸಂಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ ವೇಳಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ.

1) ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಪ್ರಪತ್ರ-1ಎ ರಲ್ಲಿ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ನೋಟೀಸನ್ನು

: 3-11-2009 ಪ್ರಕಟಿಸುವ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ

(ಮಂಗಳವಾರ) 2) ನಾಮಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಸಲ್ಲಿಸಲು ಕೊನೆಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 10-11-2009

(ಮಂಗಳವಾರ) 3) ನಾಮಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸುವ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 11-11-2009

(ಬುಧವಾರ) 4) ಉಮೇದುವಾರಿಕೆಗಳನ್ನು ಹಿಂತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಕೊನೆಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ : 13-11-2009

(ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ) 5) ಮತದಾನ ಅವಶ್ಯವಿದ್ದರೆ ಮತದಾನವನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾದ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು : 22-11-2009 ದಿನ

(ಭಾನುವಾರ) 6) ಮತದಾನದ ಸಮಯ ದಿನಾಂಕ 22.11.2009 ರಂದು ಭಾನುವಾರ ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 7.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ ಸಾಯಂಕಾಲ

5.00 ಗಂಟೆಯವರೆಗೆ

7) ಮತಗಳ ಎಣಿಕೆಯು ದಿನಾಂಕ 23.11.2009 ರಂದು ಸೋಮವಾರ ಬೆಳಿಗ್ಗೆ 8.00 ಗಂಟೆಯಿಂದ (ತಾಲ್ಲೂಕಿನ

ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸ್ಥಳದಲ್ಲಿ)

5291

8) ಚುನಾವಣೆಯನ್ನು ಯಾವ ದಿನಾಂಕಕ್ಕೆ ಮುಂಚೆ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯಗೊಳಿಸಬೇಕೋ : 26.11.2009 ಆ ದಿನಾಂಕ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನ

(ಗುರುವಾರ)

ನಗರಸಭ ೆ, ಶಿರಾ

ಪ್ರಪತ್ರ-1 ರ ಅನುಬಂಧ

(ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ವಾರು ವಿವರಗಳಿಗೆ ನಗರಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಇಲಾಖೆಯ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪತ್ರ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ನಂ. ನಅಇ 88 ಎಂಎಲ್ಆರ್ 2007 (25-ಸಿ) ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ದಿನಾಂಕ 27.7.2007 ಮೇರೆಗೆ)

ಡಾ: ಸಿ. ಸೋಮಶೇಖರ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಹಾಗು ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿ, ತುಮಕೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ತುಮಕೂರು.

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 998 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯವರ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ-1

(ನಿಯಮ 8(1) ನೋಡಿ)

ನಂ. ರಾಚು/ಸಿಆರ್/25/2009-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

1964 ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ ಅಧಿನಿಯಮದ ಉಪಬಂಧಗಳ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿತವಾದ ಹರಿಹರ ನಗರಸಭೆಯ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ವಾರ್ಡಿಗೆ ಚುನಾಯಿತ ಸದಸ್ಯರಾದ ಶ್ರೀ ವೀರಣ್ಣ ಹೊಳಿಯಪ್ಪ ಬಿನ್ ಹೊಳಿಯಪ್ಪ ಇವರು ನಿಧನರಾದ ಕಾರಣ ತೆರವಾಗಿರುವ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು ಉಪಚುನಾವಣೆ ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ.

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಮುನಿಸಿಪಾಲಿಟಿಸ್ (ಎಲೆಕ್ಷನ್ ಆಫ್ ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರ್ಸ್) ನಿಯಮಗಳು 1977 ರ ನಿಯಮ 8 ರ ಅನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಯ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಕೆ.ಅಮರನಾರಾಯಣ ಆದ ನಾನು ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡಂತೆ ಉಪ ಚುನಾವಣೆಗೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ ವೇಳಾಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ನಿಗಧಿಪಡಿಸಿರುತ್ತೇನೆ.

ಕೆ.ಅಮರನಾರಾಯಣ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು, ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ.

5292

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – VI ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 999 ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳು ಹಾಗೂ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳ ಕಾರ್ಯಾಲಯ, ಚಿಕ್ಕಬಳ್ಳಾಪುರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ

ಪ ್ರಪತ ್ರ-1

[ನಿಯಮ 8(1)ನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ]

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ

ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ಇಎಲ್ಎನ್/ಸಿಆರ್/91/2009-10, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 3ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

ಚಿಕ್ಕಬಳ್ಳಾಪುರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಚಿಂತಾಮಣಿ ನಗರ ಸಭೆಯ 11ನೇ ವಾರ್ಡ್‌ನ ಸದಸ್ಯ ಸ್ಥಾನವು ಶ್ರೀ ನಂಜುಂಡೇಶ್ವರ ರವರ ಮರಣದ ಕಾರಣದಿಂದಾಗಿ ತೆರವಾಗಿರುವುದಾಗಿ ಘೋಷಣೆಯಾಗಿರುವುದರಿಂದ, ಖಾಲಿ ಸ್ಥಾನವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು ಚುನಾವಣೆಯನ್ನು ನಡೆಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ.

ಆದುದರಿಂದ, ಈಗ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಪುರಸಭೆಗಳ (ಕೌನ್ಸಿಲರುಗಳು ಚುನಾವಣೆ) ನಿಯಮಗಳು, 1977ರ ನಿಯಮ 8ರ ಮೇರೆಗೆ ಶ್ರೀ ಅನ್ವರ್‌ಪಾಷ ಭಾ.ಆ.ಸೇ., ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಹಾಗೂ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿಯಾದ ನಾನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ಸದರಿ ಚುನಾವಣೆಗೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡಂತೆ ಚುನಾವಣೆ ವೇಳಾ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯನ್ನು ನಿಗದಿಪಡಿಸಿರುತ್ತೇನೆ.

ಜಿಲ್ಲಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಹಾಗೂ ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಚುನಾವಣಾಧಿಕಾರಿ ಚಿಕ್ಕಬಳ್ಳಾಪುರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ

ಭಾಗ – IV-A ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ.1000

FINANCE SECRETARIAT

NOTIFICATION

No. FD 38 CSL 2009, Bangalore, Dated: 3rd November, 2009 Whereas, the draft of the following rules further to amend the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, was published as required by sub-section (1) of section 88 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (Karnataka Act 32 of 2004) in Notification No. FD 38 CSL 2009, dated 2nd September 2009 in Part-IV-A of the Karnataka Gazette (Extraordinary No. 773) dated: 2nd September 2009, inviting objections or suggestions from all the persons likely to be affected thereby and notice was given that the said draft will be taken in to consideration, after fifteen days from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

And, whereas, the said Gazette was made available to the public on 2nd September 2009.

5293

And whereas, no objections and suggestions have been received in respect of the said draft rules by the Government.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 88 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (Karnataka Act 32 of 2004) the Government of Karnataka hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 namely,-

RULES

1. Title and commencement:- (1) These rules may be called the Karnataka Value Added Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2009.

(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. Amendment of rule 34:- In the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, in rule 34, in sub rule (2), after the words "Chartered Accountant", the words "or a Cost Accountant" shall be inserted.

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,

K. MOHAN Desk Officer, Finance Department (C.T.-I)

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – IV-A ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಮಂಗಳವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 3, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 12, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1001

COOPERATION SECRETARIAT

NOTIFICATION

No. CO 19 CLM 2009 (P-1), Bengaluru, Dated: 3rd November, 2009 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 1 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2009 (Ordinance No. 8 of 2009), the Government of Karnataka hereby appoints the 3rd November 2009 to be the date from which the provisions of the Ordinance shall come into force.

BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA,

R.S. HUCHACHARY Officer on Special Duty & Ex-officio Joint Secretary to Government Cooperation Department

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – I ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಬುಧವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 4, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 13, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1002 PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

MINORITY WELFARE SECRETARIAT

Sub : Supersession of Karnataka State Board of Wakfs- reg

Read : 1. Notification No. RD 03 WES 2003, dated: 20-09-2005.

2. Show cause notice No: MWD 193 WES 2008, dated: 11-05-2009.

3. Letter No. KTW/02/ADM/09-10, dated: 18-05-2009. 4. Letter No. MWD 193 WES 2009, dated: 19-05-2009. 5. Letter No. KTW/02/ADM/09-10, dated: 25-05-2009. 6. Letter No. MWD 193 WES 2009, dated: 26-05-2009.

7. Letter No. KTW/02/ADM/09-10, dated: 26-05-2009. 8. Letter No. MWD 193 WES 2009, dated: 27-05-2009.

5294

Preamble:

In Notification read at (1) above the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs was constituted under Section 14(9) of the Wakf Act 1995, and under Rule 32 of the Karnataka Wakf Rules 1997 for a period of five years. During the course of its functioning, it has come to the notice of the Government that the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs is not functioning as per the provisions of the Wakf Act 1995, and has persistently made default in the performance of the duties imposed on it. Also that, certain decisions taken by the Board have resulted in the loss of properties and assets of the Wakf institutions. It was also noticed that the Board has abused its powers willfully and without sufficient cause failed to comply with the directions of the State Government. Hence the Government framed 10 Charges against the Board and a Show Cause Notice was issued in No.MWD 193 WES 2008 dated 11-5-2009 under Section 99(1) of the Wakf Act 1995, to show cause as to why the State Government should not supersede the Board for the lapses indicated in the charges framed against it. The Board was given 15 days time to reply to the above charges.

In response to the above notice, the Chief Executive Officer of the Board requested for one month's time from 18-5-2009 to reply. The Government was pleased to extend the time till 30-5-2009. Again, the CEO of the Board in his letter No. KTW/02/Adm/09-10 dated 25-5-2009 further requested to extend the time to reply by at least 30 days from that date. However, as the Government did not see any genuine reason for extension of time, the request of the Board was rejected. Again, in his letter of even no. Dated 26-5-2009 the same plea was repeated by the CEO of the Board and it was also rejected.

In the meantime, some of the members of the Board filed Writ Petitions No. 14382-86/2009 (GM- RRs) before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka challenging the Show Cause Notice issued by the Government. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka passed an interim order not to precipitate the matter for a period of 10 days w.e.f. 29-5-2009. Thereafter, from time to time, the said Interim Order had been extended till the disposal of the case. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka by an order dated 20-8-2009 dismissed the above Writ Petitions with an observation that the Petitioners may file Statement of Objections to the Show Cause Notice to the Government. If such Statement of Objections are filed, the concerned authority shall consider the Statement of Objections independent of the COD report and thereafter pass orders in accordance with the law and till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners.

In obedience to the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, the Government of Karnataka issued a letter to the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs to furnish replies to the Show Cause Notice within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter No.MWD 193 WES 2009 dated: 26-08-2009.

The CEO of the Board in his letter dated 8-9-2009 informed that the reply will be furnished after the Special Board meeting, which is convened on 15-9-2009. Thereafter the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs filed detailed replies to the Show Cause Notice on 19-9-2009 vide letter No.KTW/02/ADM/09-10 dated 17-9-2009.

In the said letter, it is mentioned that the Board has deliberated upon the issues and has prepared detailed Para wise replies to the Show Cause Notice. Further, it is stated that, for want of time the Board could not finalise the objections and hence requested for grant of 3 weeks time for filing the objections to the Show Cause Notice and also the Government was requested to provide an opportunity of being heard in person along with their counsel so as to enable the Board to further clarify its explanation in detail.

In response to the above request of the Board, the Government in its letter No.MWD 193 WES 2009 dated 19-9-2009 clarified that as the Board has already furnished replies to the Show Cause Notice, the question of giving further 3 weeks time does not arise. It was also informed that even though there is no provision in the Wakf Act 1995 for providing opportunity for a personal hearing, however the Government was pleased to provide personal hearing on 22-9-2009 at 3.00 PM at the chambers of the Secretary to Government, Minority Welfare Department, Vikasa Soudha, Bangalore. On that day and on 30-09-2009. The petitioners Sriyuths Syed Zayeem Raza, K.M.Ibrahim, Syed Mujtaba Hussain Jagirdar and A.M. Hindasgeri, have put in appearance through their Counsel Shri H.H.Kaladgi and Sriyuths Khalid Ahmed, Syed Mudeer Aga and R.Abdul Riyaz Khan have put in appearance through their Counsel Shri S.Ganesh Shenoy and sought for time to file objections.

The case was posted to 14-10-2009 to file objections. On 14-10-2009 the learned counsels for the petitioners filed a memo to withdraw the directions issued by the Government, in which, the Government had directed the Board not to take any decision in view of the proceedings pending against it. However, the Government withdrew the directions on 15-10-2009 and the case was taken up on 16-10-2009. On this day on the request of the counsels, time was granted up to 26-10-2009 to file objections if any.

5295

On 26-10-2009 the Chief Executive Officer of the Wakf Board filed objections to the Show Cause Notice as approved by the Board in its meeting held on 24-10-2009. Finally, the counsels were given time for personal hearing, if any on 31-10-2009.

On 31-10-2009 the counsels for the petitioners filed a memo stating that the present Secretary to Government, Department of Minority Welfare, in a different capacity had participated in the proceedings of the sub committee of the Wakf Board on 7-4-2008 & 7-5-2008 and had expressed opinion on the said issue, hence it was requested to replace the enquiry officer with any other officer. The Secretary to Government referred this memo for orders of the Government. The Government considered this memo and found that the petitioners have furnished replies to the showcase notice issued and also filed their objections on each of the charges framed against the Board, by that they have fulfilled the statutory requirement. As they had requested, sufficient opportunity was given to them for oral hearing. In spite of it, the petitioners instead of obliging to oral hearing were trying to prolong the proceedings by raising one or the other issues. Hence, as the statutory requirement has been complied with, the Government decided to proceed further and consider the replies and objections filed by the petitioners as follows:-

CHARGE NO 1:

Filing of Joint Memo of compromise in the High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No 18272/ 2005,C/W W.P.No.24104/2006:

1. The Karnataka State Board of Wakfs has filed a joint memo of compromise in WP No.18272/2005,C/W W.P.No.24104/2006, filed by the legal heirs of late Sri Bhavari Lal seeking handing over of possession of land measuring 2.00 acres 3 guntas in Annipura Village, Bangalore, belonging to Dargah Hazarath Athaullah Shah and Hazrath Nabishah commonly known as 'Bada Makan' H.Siddaiah Road, Bangalore, a Muslim Charitable and wakf institution governed by the provisions of the Wakf Act 1954 by accepting a sum of Rs.1.00(one) crore only. The following crucial aspects have not been taken into consideration before formalizing this deal with a private party for a paltry sum of Rs.1.00 crore:-

(1) For more than three decades, the Bada Makan has claimed and established ownership of the said land on the basis of genuine record of rights and other legal documents.

(2) The Hon' High Court of Karnataka in its judgment dated 19-7-2000, in W.P.No.27111/95 had upheld that the rights of ownership vested with the Wakf Board and this position has not been legally disputed by anybody so far.

(3) The compromise joint memo filed by the Wakf Board runs contrary to the findings and directions of the Hon' High Court in Writ Petition No.27111/95. By not taking action in compliance with the directions of the Hon'ble High Court and by filing a joint memo of compromise in another proceedings before the High Court of Karnataka, the Board of Wakf has committed a contemptuous act.

(4) Since the legal heirs of late Shri Bhavari Lal have not pursued the matter before the competent civil court for title and declaration of right of ownership in respect of the above land, and they had no locus standi to file another writ petition before the High Court seeking handing over of possession of the said land. Also the Karnataka state Board of wakf was not made a party in this W.P. By offering compensation now, the petitioners have indirectly acknowledged the legal ownership of the Wakf Board. As such entering into a compromise with a private party who did not even have semblance of right of ownership and giving up legal ownership in favour of a private party by accepting a paltry compensation of Rs.1.00 crore is against the interest of wakfs and wakf property and also larger public interest.

As per section 93 of the Wakf Act 1995, no suit or proceeding in any court relating to title to wakf property shall be comprised without the sanction of the Board. The W.P filed by the legal heirs of Bhavari lal was not for declaration of title before the High Court of Karnataka nor such a proceeding can be initiated before the High Court in view of the rulings of the Division Bench of Karnataka as reported in ILR 2005 KAR 1583. Inspite of it the Board deliberately filed an intervening application in the above W.P and filed a compromise petition which is illegal and unwarranted and uncalled for against the interest of the Wakf for extraneous reasons and the decision taken by the Board to file the comprise memo before the High Court was not by 2/3rd majority of the members of the Board as required under section 32 of the Wakf Act. Thus the Board has erred in filing the joint memo before the High Court, and acted with a self- perceived urgency resulting in sever financial losses to the Wakf institution. Besides, the joint memo was filed, in a hurry even before confirmation of the same by the Board.

In the circumstances, it is evident that the Karnataka Board of Wakfs has acted with a self- perceived urgency and without any regard to the interest of the organization.

5296

The COD which probed this issue has also in its report concluded that even though all the records speaks that the property in question belonged to the Wakf institution of Bada Makan, the Board has taken an illegal and a mala fide decision to file a joint memo resulting in the loss of Rupees Twenty Crores to the Wakf institution.

2. Compromise settlement in respect of Land in Survey No. 1 of Annipura Village, Bangalore Urban Dist.

There was a long pending legal battle between the Wakf Institution Hazrath Ataulla Shah and Nabi Shah, Bada Makan, Bangalore and LRs of one Sri. Yellappa with regard to property measuring 20670 Sq ft at Siddiah Road, Bangalore. The Board had approved in its meeting held on 05-02-2008 at agenda no.14 the compromise between the Wakf institutions and the LRs of Yellappa, according to which the Wakf will get only 10,174 Sq ft and the LRs of Yellappa will get 10,496 Sq ft of the said property. Such sanction cannot be given unless atleast 2/3rd of the members of the Board vote in favour of such transaction and only in a title suit before the competent court of law under Section 93 of the Wakf Act 1995. Therefore, there is a violation of Section 93 & 32 (2)(j) of the Wakf Act in this case. As such the transaction that took place in this behalf is illegal and detrimental to the interest of the Wakf institution.

Findings on Charge No: 1 and Charge No 2:

It is stated that the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs based on the proposal received from the Wakf institution placed this matter before the Board for a decision. It is also stated that the Board relied on the legal opinion of the Law Department and the report of the Special Deputy Commissioner along with other documents to arrive at a decision.

The Board on an earlier occasion during 2006 considered the same proposal of the Wakf Institution, at that time also, all these documents were in existence, Inspite of it, the proposal of the Wakf institution was rejected in toto. After it was rejected, there was no change in the status nor any new event has occurred for the Board to reopen the same issue and pass contradictory order, which is detrimental to the interest of the Wakf institution. Shri M.A.Khalid, the then Administrator of the Wakf Institution during 2006 had sworn an Affidavit that the property belongs to the Wakf institution. Now, for the second time, the very same Administrator in the capacity of CEO of the Wakf Board has taken a contradictory stand for a compromise joint memo to be filed before the Hon'ble High Court and submitted a proposal for approval of the Wakf Board, which the Board has approved against the interest of the Wakf institution.

Even though the Gazette Notification does not indicate the extent of each survey number, the total extent has been indicated and the fact remains that these properties were managed by the Muzarai Department of Government of Karnataka and during 1975 they were transferred to the Wakf Board under the provision of the Wakf Act, 1954. The register maintained by the Muzarai department clearly indicates the extent, assessment etc. of each survey number and as regarding the property under dispute, the record of rights is very clear about the extent, assessment as seen in the RTC and other documents. It is stated by the Wakf Board that the above property was acquired bit by bit from the original owners by late Sri Bhavari Lal. As seen from the annexure of the replies given by the Board, some of the purchase deeds of Bhavari Lal are unregistered documents, and some are registered and all these documents pertain to the period from 1946 to 1954, the validity of these unregistered documents are yet to be proved. Secondly, regarding the registered documents are concerned, what is to be seen is whether they have been executed by the competent persons as per the Act and when these documents were executed, the said property was in the name of Hazarath Athaullah Shah Dargah and Hazrath Nabishah Dargah. They were Wakf properties, which were under the control of Muzarai department. There are no records to show that the Government of Karnataka had permitted any person to sell these properties in favour of Sri Bhavari Lal.

Mere execution of a document by some unauthorized persons does not create any right in favour of a person. If Sri Bhavari Lal had any legal right he would have definitely filed declaratory suit and obtained orders of the competent Civil Court. Surprisingly till 1980 he slept over the matter even 25 years after the execution of the so-called sale deeds. This itself indicates that the claim of Sri Bhavari Lal is not genuine.

The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition No.27111/95 has categorically concluded that the said land belongs to Hazarath Athaullah Shah Darga and Hazrath Nabishah Darga. The record of rights of 1972-73 maintained by the Tahsildar, Bangalore North Taluk also confirms it. The endowment documents of Bangalore City Corporation clearly indicates that these lands belong to Hazarath Athaullah Shah Dargah and Hazrath Nabishah Dargah. During 1975 the Endowment Department transferred these properties from Muzarai to Wakf, the relevant documents also confirm it. The Housing and Urban Development Department issued a Notification during 1985 for acquisition of the said land, in that notification also, it is clearly indicated that the said land is a Devadaya Inam land which belongs to Hazarath Athaullah Shah Dargah and Hazrath Nabishah Dargah. Similarly, in the 5297

Appeal No.1011/1959 the Revenue Appellate Tribunal in its order has clearly indicated that the said land is a Devadaya Inam of Hazarath Athaullah Shah Dargah and Hazrath Nabishah Dargah. The said order indicates that the land was a Inam land given by Maharaja of Mysore in the year 1812 in favour of Hazarath Athaullah Shah Dargah and Hazrath Nabishah Dargah.

A mere opinion given by a Revenue Officer or a Law Officer cannot determine title to a property, at the most, it can be an opinion and only a Competent Civil Court can determine the title and ownership of a property.

It is not denied that the property is in the possession of HOPCOMS. It is also a fact that Shri Bhavari Lal had never stepped into this property at any point of time. He and his children are in the habit of approaching High Court seeking relief on various issues and avoiding filing a declaratory suit in a Competent Civil Court, if they are genuine purchasers of the property.

The Wakf Board has consistently claimed the said property as belonging to Wakf institution in all the litigations since 1980 and abruptly during 2007 decided to withdraw their claim and part with the title of the land for a meager amount of Rs.1.00 crore, even though the value of the property was around Rs.20 crores at that time.

It is also beyond comprehension to accept how the Wakf Board can disown title to the said property without following the due process of law and even without seeking approval of the State Government. In other words, the Wakf Board has assumed the role of a Civil Court to decide title to a property in favour of a private person.

Surprisingly the Board interpreted Sec.32 (2)(j) stating that the said joint memo filed by it is not covered under the classification of sale, gift, mortgage, exchange or lease. Parting with the title of a property in favour of a private person for a meager amount of Rs.1.00 crore definitely amounts to sale and it is also clear that 2/3rd members of the Board shall vote in favour of such a transaction, but they have failed to prove that 2/3rd of the members were present while taking this decision on this subject.

The Board has accepted that they have filed a joint memo even before the confirmation of the said order and states that confirmation is only a formality. This clearly indicates that the Board was in a hurry to finalise the matter before it attracts the attention of the Government.

It is also to be noticed that the very same Wakf Board initiated eviction proceedings against HOPCOMS under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act 1974 taking the stand that the property belongs to the Wakf Board. Such being the case, the Wakf Board was estopped from changing its stand and filed a joint memo before the High Court showing that the property belongs to Sri Bhavani Lal. Thus, the explanation furnished by the Wakf Board is totally unacceptable and hence the charge framed against them is proved beyond any doubt.

Charge No 3 :

Alienation of wakf property in Sy.Nos. 37,38,39, 40,41, 42,44,45,63,98,99,102,105,106 and 104 of Hallimanlu Village and Sy.Nos. 111,112,113 of Jeeganahally Village, Kasaba Hobli, Ramanagar Taluk belonging to Sattaria Wakf.

The Board has failed to protect the above wakf property by not taking timely and appropriate action to incorporate the entries in the Akarband and other Revenue records. The Board inspite of the representation received from Sri A.K.S. Samad and his son Sri Mohsin, about the malafide intention of one Sri Abdul Sattar alias Amjad, to manipulate the records has failed to take prompt action in time. Consequently, 24.19 acres of the said land was sold for a consideration of Rs.43,96,900/-to one Sri Muniraju, against the provision of the Wakf Act 1995.

Findings on Charge No 3:

The explanation furnished by the Wakf Board is accepted. However, there was delay on the part of the Wakf Board to take prompt action.

Charge No 4:

The non recovery of deposits made in Bangalore Mercantile Co-operative Bank and Al-Iqra Co-operative Bank, Davangere,

The Board of Wakfs has deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,00,000/- (Rupees One core fifty lakhs only) in Bangalore Mercantile Co-operative Bank, which was a Grant-in-Aid amount kept in the Board in a separate account by the Government in Bangalore. Against this, an amount of Rs.1,27,50,000/- (Rupees One Crore twenty seven lakhs and fifty thousand only) has been with drawn leaving a balance of about Rs. 50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty lakhs only) including the interest on deposits un-recovered till date.

5298

Another Rs.15.00 lakhs which was deposited in Al-Iqra Co-operative Society, Davangere, has not been recovered from the said Bank so far. Thereby, the Board has failed to protect the financial interest and caused default in the performance of the duty imposed on it.

Findings on Charge No.4:

The explanation of the Wakf Board that Rs.15 lakhs deposited with Al-Iqra Bank, Davangere has been recovered is accepted. But other part of the charge of non-recovery of Rs.50 lakhs from Bangalore Mercantile Co-operative Bank is not accepted, as the amount has not been recovered even now. The efforts made by the Wakf Board are not satisfactory. Hence the charge is partially proved.

Charge No 5:

Failure to implement the directions of Government Under Section 97 of the Wakf Act 1995:

The State Government had directed the Board to constitute the District Advisory Committees wherever the same has not been constituted. However, the Board has failed to heed to the directions of the Government under Section 97, which is mandatory on the part of the Board.

In letter No.MWD 13 WES 2008, dated 2-1-2009, the Government under Section 97, of the Wakf Act 1995, directed the Board to appoint Sri Abdul Wajid, Retired Joint Director of Education, as Administrator of Hazrath Athaulla Shah Nabi Shah known as Bada Makan in place of Sri M.A.Khalid, Chief Executive Officer, Karnataka State Board of Wakfs, the Board instead of following the directions of the Government constituted a committee of five members, when 11 members on the committee was required to be constituted. In this connection, a show cause notice No.MWD 13 WES 2008, dated 4-2- 2009, was issued to the Board to furnish reply within 7 days from the date of receipt. However, no reply has been received in Government to the show cause notice. The Board has therefore, wilfully and without sufficient cause failed to comply with the directions issued by the State Government under Section 97 of the Wakf Act 1995.

Findings on Charge No. 5:

In letter No.MWD 13 WES 2008, dated 02-01-2009 the Government under Section 97 of the Wakf Act 1995 directed the Board to appoint Shri Abdul Wajid, Retired Joint Director of Education as Administrator of Hazrath Athaulla Shah Nabi Shah known as Bada Makan in place of Shri M.A. Khalid, Chief Executive Officer, Karnataka State Board of Wakfs. The Board in its reply to the show cause notice has informed that the subject pertaining to the constitution of the regular Managing Committee of Bada Makan was already included in the agenda of the Board meeting held on 03-01-2009.

The Managing Committee of the Wakf Institution was required to be constituted with 11 Members as per clause VI(2) of the approved scheme of management of Bada Makan. However, as could be seen from the reply of the Board for the Managing Committee of Dargha Haz Athaulla Shah and Nabi Sha (Bada Makhan) the Board decided to constitute it with only 5 Members including Shri M.A.Khalid, Chief Executive Officer who was to be replaced as Administrator of the Wakf Institution. In this regard Show Cause Notice No.MWD 13 WES 2008, dated 04-02-2009 was issued to the Board as to why the directions of the Government was not adhered to. However, the Board has failed to reply to the show cause notice, thereby, the Board willfully and without sufficient cause failed to comply with the directions issued by the State Government under Section 97 of the Wakf Act 1995.

Charge No 6:

Removal of members absenting from the meetings:

Section 29 (1) (c) of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that the State Government may by notification in the official Gazette remove the Chairperson of the Board or any member if he fails in the opinion of the Board, to attend three consecutive meetings of the Board, without sufficient excuse. Even though some members have not attended three consecutive meetings of the Board, the Board has not informed the Government for their removal as per Section 20 (1) (c) of the Wakf Act, 1995.

Findings on Charge No: 6

The Board has informed that the power of removal of Members of the Board absenting from the meetings of the Board vest with the Government. It is true that Section 20 of the Wakf Act 1995 empowers the State Government to remove the Chairperson of the Board or any Members thereof fails in the opinion of the Board to attend three consecutive meetings of the Board without sufficient excuse. However, the Government would take such action on receipt of a report from the Wakf Board about the failure of the Member not attending three consecutive meetings. In the past the Board has not been following the practice of sending either the meeting notices or the proceedings of the Board meetings to 5299

Government. As such, the Board has erred in not informing the Government about the absence of the following members:

1. Shri Iqbal Ahmad Saradagi, Ex.M.P.

2. Shri C.K. Jaffar Shareef, Ex.M.P.

3. Shri Moulana Mufti Ashraf Ali

and allowing them as members of the Board when they had become ineligible as members of the Board. Thereby the Board has failed in its performance of duties as per the provisions of the Act and hence the charge is proved.

Charge No 7:

Assumption of direct management of certain wakfs:

Section 65 (3) of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that as soon as possible after the close of every financial year, the Board shall send to the State Government a detailed report in regard to every wakf under its direct management, giving therein-

a) The details of the income of the wakf for the year immediately preceding the year under report.

b) The steps taken to improve the management and income of the wakf;

c) The period during which the wakf has been under the direct management of the Board and explaining the reasons as to why it has not been possible to entrust the management of the wakf to the mutawalli or any committee of management during the year. However, the Board has failed to follow the provisions of Section 65 (3) of the Wakf Act 1995

Section 65 (1) of the Wakf Act 1995, envisages that the period of direct management of the wakf shall not exceed 5 years. However, including the Bada Makan, it is seen that many of the wakf institutions are under the direct management of the Board even after exceeding five years which is a serious issue and the Board has failed to act as per the provisions of the Wakf Act 1995.

Finding on Charge No.7:

The reply given is not convincing. Section 65(1) of the Wakf Act 1995 envisages that the period of direct management of the Wakf shall not exceed 5 years. However, the following Wakf Institutions were under the direct management of the Board exceeding 5 years.

1. Dargah Hazarat Athaullah Shah and Nabi Shah (Bada Makan), Bangalore.

2. Hazrath Ishaq Sha Makan, Kolar

3. Jamia Masjid & Masjid-e-Aala (Masjid-e-Eidgah), Mysore.

As per Section 65(3) of the Wakf Act the Board has failed to send detail report on.-

a) The details of the income of the Wakf for the year immediately preceding the year under report.

b) The steps to improve the management and income of the Wakf;

c) The period during which the Wakf has been under the direct management of the Board and explaining the reasons as to why it has not been possible to entrust the management of the Wakf to the Mutawalli or any Committee of management during the year.

The Board has failed to follow the provisions of Section 65(3) of the Wakf Act 1995 and hence the charge is proved.

Charge No 8:

Preparation of Board's Budget:

Section 78 (1) of the Wakf Act 1995, the Board shall in every year prepare in such form and at such time as may be prescribed a budget for the next financial year showing the estimated receipts and expenditure during that financial year and forward a copy of the same to the State Government. Section 78 (2) of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that on receipt of the budget forwarded to it under sub section (1), the State Government shall examine the same and suggest such alterations, corrections or modifications to be made therein as it may think fit and forward such suggestions to the Board for its consideration.

5300

Section 78 (3) of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that on receipt of the suggestions from the State Government the Board may make written representations to that Government with regard to the alterations, corrections or modifications suggested by that Government and the State Government shall, after considering such representations, communicate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt thereof, to the Board its final decision in relation to the matter and the decision of the State Government shall be final.

Section 78 (4) of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that on receipt of the decision of the State Government under sub-section (3) the Board shall incorporate in its budget all the alternations, corrections, modifications finally suggested by the State Government and the budget as so altered, corrected or modified, shall be the budget which shall be passed by the Board.

The Board has failed to comply with the above provisions of the Act, and has failed to send the budgetary proposals to the Government as required by the Act.

Findings on Charge No. 8:

On the question of submitting the Budget of the Board to Government under Section 78(1) (2) (3) and (4) of the Wakf Act 1995, the Board has informed that it has sent the proposals to Government in this regard. However, on examination of the files it is seen that the Board had sent proposals to Government seeking budgetary provision to the Board in the State Budget. Section 78 stipulates that the Board is required to prepare its budget and submit the same for approval of the Government. This is required to be done as per Rule 66 of the Wakf Rules 1997. This has not been done, thereby violating provisions of Act and Rules and hence the charge is proved.

Charge No. 9:

Audit of Accounts of Board:

Section 80 (1) of the Act, stipulates that the accounts of the Board shall be audited and examined annually by such auditor as may be appointed by the State Government. In this connection, the Board neither has requested for appointment of auditor's nor have sent the auditors report for examination by Government. Thus, the Board has violated Section 80 of the Wakf Act 1995.

Findings on Charge No. 9:

Section 80(1) of the Act stipulates that the accounts of the Board shall be audited and examined annually by such auditor as may be appointed by the State Government. In this connection, the Board neither has requested for appointment of auditors nor have sent the auditors report for examination by Government. In this regard the Board has not made any correspondence with the Government. Thus, the Board has violated Section 80 of the Wakf Act 1995 and hence the charge is proved.

Charge No. 10:

State Government to pass order on auditor's report:

Section 81 of the Wakf Act 1995, stipulates that the State Government shall examine the auditor's report and may call for the explanation of any person in regard to any matter mentioned therein and shall pass such orders on the report as it thinks fit. However, the Board has failed to send the auditor's report to the Government for examination, thereby flouting the provisions of Section 81 of the Act.

Findings on Charge No 10:

It is true that the State Government shall examine the Auditors' report and may call for explanation of any person in regard to any matter mentioned therein and shall pass such orders on the report as it thinks fit. However, this exercise by the Government will be taken only on receipt of reports from the Board. Unfortunately, such reports have not been sent to the Government by the Board and hence the charge is proved.

From the above, out of the ten charges framed against the Karnataka Board of Wakfs, eight have been fully proved, one partially proved and the reply furnished in respect of one more charge has been accepted. From the charges proved above, it is clear that the Board has abused its powers and has willfully and without sufficient cause failed to comply with the direction issued by the State Government under section 97 of the Wakf Act 1995 and has failed to act as per the various provisions of the Wakf Act 1995. Therefore this order.

GOVERNMENT ORDER NO. MWD 193 WES 2009, BANGALORE, DATED THE: 4TH NOVEMBER, 2009,

After careful examination of the explanations and objections furnished by the Board to the State Government, eight charges have been fully proved and one charge has been partially proved out of the 5301

ten charges framed against the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs. Therefore, the Government is pleased to order to supersede the Karnataka State Board of Wakfs for a period of six months from the date of this order under Section 99 (1) and appoint Shri M.A. Saleem., IPS., Deputy Inspector General of Police as Administrator under Section 99 (2) (b) of the Wakf Act 1995 to exercise all powers and duties on behalf of the Board during the period of Supersession.

BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA

R NISAR AHMED Under Secretary to Government Minority Welfare Department

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ – IV-A ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 6, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 15, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1004

TRANSPORT SECRETARIAT

NOTIFICATION

No. SARIE 257 SAEPA 2009, Bangalore, Dated: 3rd October, 2009

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (1) of section-16 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1957 (Karnataka Act 35 of 1957) the Government of Karnataka, hereby exempt from payment of Road Tax and also payment of Registration fee to the following official vehicle, belonging to Mr. Dominique Causse, Consul General of France in Bangalore.

Consul General : Mr. Dominique CAUSSE

Official Vehicle : 03 CC 2 (Toyota Camry)

(Vehicle No. to be assigned by the jurisdictional R.T.O.)

BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA,

T.N. NARASIHMARAJU Desk Officer (I/c) Transport Department (080-22032014)

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ

ಭಾಗ – IV-A ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 6, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 15, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1005

TRANSPORT SECRETARIAT

NOTIFICATION

No. SARIE 248 SAEPA 2009, Bangalore, Dated: 3rd October, 2009

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (1) of section-16 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1957 (Karnataka Act 35 of 1957) the Government of Karnataka, hereby exempt from payment of Road Tax and also payment of Registration fee to the following personal vehicle, belonging to Mrs. Brigitte Elisabeth Reid, Consular Attache of Consulate of Germany in Bangalore.

Consul Attache : Mrs. Brigitte Elisabeth Reid

Personal Vehicle : 01 CC 3A (Pajero Long)

(*Vehicle No. to be assigned by the jurisdictional R.T.O.)

BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA,

T.N. NARASIHMARAJU Desk Officer (I/c) Transport Department (080-22032014) 5302

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ

ಭಾಗ – III ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಶನಿವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 7, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 16, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1006

ವಾಣಿಜ್ಯ ಮತ್ತು ಕೈಗಾರಿಕೆ ಸಚಿವಾಲಯ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ಸಿಐ 404 ಎಸ್‌ಪಿಕ್ಯೂ 2006, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 7ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕೈಗರಿಕಾ ಪ್ರದೇಶಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಕಾಯ್ದೆಯ (1966ರ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕಾಯ್ದೆ 18, 1966) ಕಲಂ 3(1) 1(3) ಮತ್ತು 28(1)ರ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ಸಿಐ 125 ಎಸ್‌ಪಿಕ್ಯೂ 2005, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 28.05.2005ರಲ್ಲಿ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಜಿಲ್ಲೆ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಪೂರ್ವ ತಾಲ್ಲೂಕು, ವರ್ತೂರು ಹೋಬಳಿ, ಅಮಾನಿ ಬೆಳ್ಳಂದೂರುಖಾನೆ ಗ್ರಾಮದ ಒಟ್ಟು 80 ಎಕರೆ 33 ಗುಂಟೆ ವಿಸ್ತೀರ್ಣವುಳ್ಳ ಅನುಬಂಧದಲ್ಲಿರುವ ಸರ್ವೆ ನಂಬರ್‌ಗಳ ಜಮೀನಿಗೆ ಅನ್ವಯವಾಗುವಂತೆ ಭೂಸ್ವಾಧೀನ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆಯನ್ನು ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಸಲು ಹೊರಡಿಸಲಾದ ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಯನ್ನು 1897ರ ಜನರಲ್ ಕ್ಲಾಜಸ್ ಕಾಯ್ದೆಯ ಕಲಂ 21ರನ್ವಯ ವಿರಹಿತವಾಗಿರುವ ಅಧಿಕಾರದ ಮೇರೆಗೆ ರದ್ದುಪಡಿಸಿ (ಖಜಛಿiಟಿಜ), ಆದೇಶಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ.

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯಪಾಲರ ಆದೇಶಾನುಸಾರ ಮತ್ತು ಅವರ ಹೆಸರಿನಲ್ಲಿ

ಕೆ.ಎಂ.ವೀರಯ್ಯ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಅಧೀನ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ (ಕೈ.ಅ) ವಾಣಿಜ್ಯ ಮತ್ತು ಕೈಗಾರಿಕೆ ಇಲಾಖೆ.

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ಸಿಐ 404 ಎಸ್‌ಪಿಕ್ಯೂ 2006 ದಿನಾಂಕ: 7ನೇ ನವೆಂಬರ್, 2009

- : : ಅನುಬಂಧ

: : -

5303

5304

5305

ಕೆ.ಎಂ.ವೀರಯ್ಯ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಅಧೀನ ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ (ಕೈ.ಅ) ವಾಣಿಜ್ಯ ಮತ್ತು ಕೈಗಾರಿಕೆ ಇಲಾಖೆ.

5306

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ

ಭಾಗ - III ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಸೋಮವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 2, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 11, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 989 PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SECRETARIAT

NOTIFICATION

No: DPAR 02 SKG 2009, Bangalore, Dated: 2nd November, 2009

The final gradation list of KAS Group-A(Senior Scale) cadre for the period from 01.11.1956 to 31.12.2003 has been published in the notification No:DPAR 02 SKG 2000, dated: 04.03.2006

The above mentioned gradation list is based on the Final Gradation list of KAS Group-A(Junior Scale) cadre. In this list the vacancies which have occurred from 01.11.1956 to 31.12.2003 are utilised for assigning the eligibility date as per the C & R Rules and the inter-se-seniority in the feeder cadre.

Now the vacancies have occurred in KAS Senior Scale cadre due to promotion to higher cadres, retirement, death while in service etc. They have been taken into account for preparation of draft Gradation list for the further period from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2008.

After consideration of the vacancies mentioned above, a Provisional Gradation list in the cadre of KAS Group-A(Senior Scale) as on 01.01.2009 for the period from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2008 is prepared and published herewith as Annexure-1 to this Notification.

Aggrieved persons, if any, may submit their objections / suggestions against the provisional gradation list to the Chief Secretary to Government of Karnataka with in 15 days from the date of publication of this provisional gradation list in the gazette along with documentary evidence. Objections received beyond the date will not be considered.

By Order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka,

Dr. M.T.REJU Deputy Secretary to Government,

D.P.& A.R. (Services)

Draft Provisional Gradation List of KAS (Senior Scale) Officers from 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2008 as on 01.01.09

04.03.2006. Since his name was not included in the list published on 04.03.2006 his position is shown has sl.no:01 in this list 5307

5308

5309

5310

5311

5312

5313

5314

* - subject to assigning final eligibility date in KAS (Jr.Scale) seniority list

DR. REJU.M.T DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT D.P & A.R (SERVICES)

ವಿಶೇಷ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆ ಭಾಗ - III ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಬುಧವಾರ, ನವೆಂಬರ್ 4, 2009 (ಕಾರ್ತೀಕ 13, ಶಕ ವರ್ಷ 1931) ನಂ. 1003

ವಾಣಿಜ್ಯ ಮತ್ತು ಕೈಗಾರಿಕಾ ಸಚಿವಾಲಯ

ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆ – 1

ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ: ಸಿಐ 424 ಎಸ್‌ಪಿಕ್ಯೂ 2009, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ದಿನಾಂಕ: 31ನೇ ಅಕ್ಟೋಬರ್, 2009

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಕೈಗಾರಿಕಾ ಪ್ರದೇಶಾಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಕಾಯ್ದೆ 1966ರ ವಿಧಿ 3(1) ರಡಿ ದತ್ತವಾಗಿರುವ ಅಧಿಕಾರದ ಮೇರೆಗೆ ಸರ್ಕಾರವು ಈ ಕೆಳಕಂಡ ಅನುಸೂಚಿಯಲ್ಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಣಿಸಿರುವ ಪ್ರದೇಶವನ್ನು ಕೈಗಾರಿಕಾ ಪ್ರದೇಶವೆಂದು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ಘೋಷಿಸಿದೆ.

5315

5316

5317

5318

5319

5320

5321

5322

5323

5324

5325

5326

5327

5328

5329