Government ofKerala
Reg . No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/ 12/2006-2008 കേരള സർക്കാർ 2007
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Vol. LII
No.
4th September 2007 2007 സെപ്റ്റംബർ 4
35 വാല്യം 52
Thiruvananthapuram , Tuesday തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
നമ്പർ
13th Bhadra 1929 1929 ഭാദ്രം 13
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(2) G.O. (Rt. ) No. 1992/ 2007/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
(1)
G. O. ( Rt.) No. 1991 /2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Foam Mattings India (Ltd. ) Alappuzha, Pin-688 001 and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri S. Sahasranama Iyyer , Villa No.33, Greenwoods, Padamugal, Indira Junction, Kakkanad WestP.O., Kochi -30 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government it is novessary to refer the saidsaid industrial dispute for adjudication;
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Anuna Tourist Home Bar Attached Restaurant, Perumbavoor and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by The Secretary, Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyvasaya Thoshilali Union ( CITU) , K.S.R.T.C Roal . Perumbavoor in respect of masters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Goverament it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1917) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Alappuzha. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947 ) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURA
"Whether the termination from service of Sri S. Sahasranama Iyyer , Quality Control Superintendent (Villa No. 33, Green Woods, Padamughal , Indira Junction , Kakkanad West P.O., Kochi -30) Foam Mattings (India) Ltd..Alappuzha is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to ? "
Whether the dismissal of service of K.O. Antony by the management ofAruna Tourist Home BarAttached Restaurant is justifiable or not ? If not, what reliefhe is entitled to ? " Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
(3) G.O. ( Rt .) No. 1993 /2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd Jane 2007.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) ( c ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.! to
ANNEXURE
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The General Manager, (Administration and Corporate Affairs ) , S.D.F. Industries Ltd., Pampady and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri G.H. Madhu , Chaniparambil House, Valiyapullara , Palluruthy, Kochi-6 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure tothis order;
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
to "Whether the denial of employment Smt. Lathikakumari , J., Sales- cum- cashierby Employer Sri K. Y. Varghese, Kottinad Agencies, Kadampanad is justifiable ? Ifnot, what reliefshe is entitled to ? "
(6)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 1995/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
"Whether the dismissal from service of Sri C.H. Madhu from 1-3-2006 by the management of S.D.F. Industries Ltd., is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to?"
(4) G. O. (Rt.) No. 1994/2007/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd June 2007.
Whereas, theGovernment are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt . Kanthimathy Amma, (Owner, Rekha Clay Products) , Pazhery House, Kannambathoor , Chengaloor P.O. , Puthukkad. ThrissurDistrict and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by Sri K. Nandanan, President, Thrissur Jilla Tile Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (TUCI ), Reg. No. ALC/DESK-17/ 10004, Thekkarayil Plaza, Shornoor Road, Thrissur- 1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to thisorder;
And whereas, in the opinion ofGovernment it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The General Manager, Hindustan Latex Ltd , P. B. No. 2, Peroorkada, Thiruvananthapuram and the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. T. Radhamani , Kadappathala Houses Kadappathala Nagar, East of Golf Club , Jawahar Nagar P.O., Thiruvananthapuram in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powert conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Trimmal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
ANNEXURE
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial disputebe referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The Industrial Tribunal will pas the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the denial of employment to 10 workers, namely ( 1 ) T. V.V. Sukumaran, (2) P. K. Valenia , (3) M. O. Rosily, (4) M. N. Mallika , (5) C. A. Komalam, 6) P. K. Thankamani , (7) K. Prabhakaran Nair, (8) K.R. Sumathi , (9) P. A. Puzhpa and ( 10 ) A.M. Nirmala and subsequent closing down of Rekha Clay Products, Kannambathur, ChengalurP.P. OO Thrissur Districtby the Proprietress are justifiable ? Ifnot, what relief they are entitled to get?" "Whether the termination ofemployment of Smt . T. Radhamani , Casual Worker by the Management of Hindustan Latex Lad.. Peroorkada is justifiable or not ? If not, what reliefs he is entitledto?"
G.O. (Rt. ) No. 1995/2007/LBR .
(5) Thiruvananthapurum, 23rd June 2007.
Issue No. 2. What is the quantum ofhonu entitled workers namely (1) T. V. Sukumaran ,(2) P. K. Valania, (3) Μ. Ο. (4) M. N. Mallika, (5) CA Komalam , ( 6 ) P. K. Thankamani , (7)K. Prabhakaran Nair , (8 ) K.R. Sumathi , (9)P.A. Puzhpa and ( 10 ) A. M. Nirmala for the year 2004-05 from the Management ofRekha Clay Products , Kannambathur , P.O. , Chengalur, Thrissur District. O.Rosily, (4)
By order of the Governor,
SUSY EAPEN, Under Secretaryto Goerrament .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri K.Y. Varghese, Kottinad Agencies, ( Kottinad Malayel ) Kadampanad North P.O. , Pathanamthitta and the workmen of the above referred establishment Smt. J. Lathikakumari, Karthika,ika , Puthanampalam P. O. , Iverkalapady North, Kollam District in respect of matters mentioned in the annture to this order ;