GovernmentofKerala
Reg . No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/ 12/2006-2008 കേരള സർക്കാർ 2007
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Thiruvananthapuram , Tuesday
No.
25th September 2007 2007 സെപ്റ്റംബർ 18
38 Vol. LII വാല്യം 52
തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
നമ്പർ
3rd Aswina 1929 1929 ആശ്വിനം 3
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government .
has requested Government to modify the terms of reference as shown below.
Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation ( A)
ORDER
"Whether Govindaraj Worker No. KR/ 52 /4270 iscligible for appointment as permanent woriter? " G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2133 /2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 4th July 2007.
Read -1. G. O. (Rt .) No. 828/05/LBR dated, 2-4-2005.
3. Government have examined the matter in consultation with the Labour Commissioner and are pleased to correct the terms of reference in the annexure to the Government Order read as first paper above as "Whether Shri Govindaraj , Worker No. KR/52/4270 is eligible for appointment as permanent worker ? If not, what relief he is entitled to?
4. TheGovernment order read as firm paper above will stand modified to the above extend.
2. Representation dated Nil from the General Secretary, Kerala Planta- tion Workers Union ( CITU) , Nelliyampathy, Palakkad.
3. Letter No. 1 (5) 14945/06 dated, 4-6-2007 from the Labour Commi mioner, Thiruvananthapuram.
By order of the Governor, C. K. VISWANATHAN , SecretarytoGeornment.
ORDERS (1)
1. As per Government Order read as first paper above, the Industrial Dispute between the management ofManalaroo Estate and its workmen was referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. Therein the issue for reference was as follows :
G.O. (Rt . ) No. 2207/2007/LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram, 9th July 2007- "Whether Govinda Raj No. 4270 is eligible for appointment as regular temporary ? and the relief towhich he is entitled to ? "
Whereas, theGovernment are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Arun, Proprietor, Shankar Gas Agencies, 28/468 L, Koycaco Centre , Chevayoor, Kozhikode- 673 017 (Arun, Abhilash , Kakkodi P. O. , Kozhikode ) and 2. In the representation read as second paper above the General Secretary, Kerala Plantation Workers Union ( CITU) , Nelliyampathy, Palakkad above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estate Workers Union (AITUC), Munnar P. O., Idukki District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by The Secretary, Commercial Employees Union ( C. I. T. U. ) , Reg . No. 85/68, Palayam Road, Kozhikode - 1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refor the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is neoessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government heroby direct that the said industrial dispute he referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Iduki. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (c) ofof the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court pass the award within a period of three months . will
ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
"Whether the dismistal from service of Sri Sekhar , P. F. No. 1775, Town Department by the Management of K.D.H.P. Company (P) Ltd. is justifiable or not ? Ifnot, what are the reliefs entitled to him ?" "Whether the denial of employment to Sri N. P. Subeesh, Driver, K. Sujesh , Delivery Boy and P. K. Govindan , Helper by the management of Sankar Gas Agencies , Chevayoor , Kozhikode is justifiable? If not , what relief they are entitled to . ?"
(2)
(4) G.O. (Rt .) No. 2298/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 17thJuly 2007.
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2260/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 12th July 2007
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Jose, Kottoor, Karippali, Elavampadam P. O. , Vadakkan- chery, Alathur and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri P. J. Paul , Nambyaparambil Pallathu House, Palappuram P. O. , Ottapalam in respect of natters neationed in the annexure to this order;
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between ( 1 ) Sri K. Vijaya Kumar, Sree Vighnesh, T. C. 11/3521 , Mureum Bains Corapound,Nanthancode , ThiruThiruvananthapuram, (2) Sri C. Muralezdharan Nair, Proprietor, Saroja CineHouse, Pazbakutty , Nedumangad Thiruvanan- thapuram and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri C. Muralcedharan Nair, K. C. Nilayam, Kulathara, Mancha P. O. , Nedumangad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexureto this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
AMNEXUAR
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of1947(Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEKURS
to Whether the denial of employment Sri P.J. Paul and his wife Smt . Sali by the lan'l owner Sri Jose Kottur is justifiable or not? Ifnot , what relief they are entitled to? " "Whether the denial of employment to Sri C. Muraleedharan Nair by the manage ment of Saroja Cine House is justifianle ? If not, what are the benefits he is entitled toget?"
(5) G. O. (Rt.) No. 2300/2007/LBR . Thirasananthaparam, 17th Jaly 2007.
(3) d. O. (Rt . ) No. 2261 /2007/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 12th July 2007
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri C. D. Govindan, s/ o Damodaran, (Managing Partner, Stenreo Kaleeswary Tile Works (East) , Puthukkad), Chakkungathodiyil House , Puthukkad P. O. , Thrissur-680 301 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represeated Sri Antony Kuttookkaran , General Secretary , Trichur by Whereas, theGovernment are of opmion that an industrial dispute cxists between TacManager, Munnar Workshops & Engineering Department, K. D. H. P. Company (Pvt. ) Limited, Munnar P. O. , Idukki District and the workmen of the District National Tile Workers Union ( INTUC) , Alagappa Nagar, Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Andwhereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) fof the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURI
"Whether the denial of employment to 30 workersmentioned in the list enclosed ( out of 30 workers one worker expired) and subsequent closing down of Sree Kaleeswary Tile Works (East ) , Pudukkad by the management are justifiable ? If not , what relief they ate entitled to get ? "
Name of Labourers
(6)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 2302/2007/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 17th July 2007.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri C. C. Anthony, s/o Chummar , Cheruvarhoor House, Puthussery.Puthussery. Choondal, Thrissur, and the workmen ofthe above referred establishment Shri E. C. Kunjumarakkar s/o Chekkuty, Ettukandathil House , Payyoor P. O. , Koonammochy, Thristur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nocemary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby directlirect that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Date of entry in Service
7-3-1966 1. K. V. Janaky
2. A. K. Sharada
3. M. P. Loela
4. N. M. Thanks
5. N. 8. Thanka
6. P. V. Rosy
"Whether the denial of employment to Sri E. C. Knjumarakkar , bandsaw helper by the management of M/ s C. C. Brothers Timber Industries, Puthussery , Choondal isjustifiable ? Ifnot , what reliefhe is entitled το
By order ofthe Governor,
15-1-1968
7. T. G. Karthyani
8. P. V. Santha
9. A. K. Appu
10. K. K. Kannan
11. V. K. Kalyani
23 12. V. C. Chandravathy
13. M. G. Leela
14. P. O. Thressya
(Expired)
15. P. C. Thandu
16. K. K. Devayani
17. U. K. Kamalakshy
18. M. P. Louis
SUSY EAPEN, Under SecretarytoGovernment .
19-4-1997
19. Κ . Α. Mani
20. K. P. Thomas
5-5-1994
21. P.G. Sathy
15-1-1968
22. C. R. Vijaya
15-4-1995 23. C. S. Sathyan
5-5-1994 24. V. V. Lecla
25. K. K. Shaju
26. K. K. Krishnan
27. Unnichekkan
28. V. S. Ambika
"
2-4-2000
29. T. K. Rajany
30. V. U. Giraja