Aeg . No. 1, L/TV/ ( N ) / 12/2006-2008 manent of Kerala
2008
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Vol. LIII
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY
No.
29th January 2008 2008 ജനുവരി 29
തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
വാല്യം 53 1
നമ്പർ
} 5
9th Magha 1929 1929 മാഘം 9
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government .
Labour and Rehabilitation Department
Labour and Rehabilitation ( 4)
ORDERS
(1)
2. The Hon'ble High Court as per itsjudgement dated 12-3-2007 read as 3rd paper above has quashed the above Government Order (Ext . P3 ) and directed Government to refer the industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner Union for adjudication as contemplated under section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 .
G. O. (Rt . ) No.3555/2007/LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 23rd November 2007 .
Read: 1. Govt. Letter No. 25331 /A3 /2000/LBR dated 22-10-2001 .
3. Government have examined the matter in detail and order to refer the above dispute for adjudication to the industrial Tribunal , Palakkad under section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Tribunal will pass orders within a period of three months .
2. Letter No. H4 -O . P. 442/02 dated 20-9-2007 from the Advocate General, Ernakulam.
IssueReferred for adjudication 3. Judgement of the Hon'ble High Court dated 12-3-2007 in O. P. No. 442/02, filed by Cochin -Labour Union .
"Whether the demand of the 27 employees for regularisation in service is justifiable or not?"
(2)
G.O. (Rt . ) No. 3580/2007/LBR.
Thirasananthapuram, 26th November 2007 1. An Industrial dispute arose between the management of the Pharmaceutical Corporation ( IM) Kerala Limited and its workmen represented by Cochin Labour Union over the issue of regulari- sation of its 27 employees . Government as per its order read as Ist paper above refused to refer the issue for adjudication and recorded the issue U's . 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Petitioner, Cochin Labour Union filed O. P. No. 442/02 before the High Court, citallenging the above order.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industriai dispute exists between The Secretary , Paramekkavu Deveswom, Thrissur-680 001 and the workman of referred establishment represcated by The General Secretary, Thrissur the abwe Jilla Temple Employees Singh (BMS ) , Shomur Road, Patturaikkal , Tarissur in respect of nuters mentioned in the annскиге this order;
- And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said , industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award witain 4 period of three months.
ANNEXURE
to the Whether the denial of employment Sri C. Pramod Security man by management of Paramekkavu Devawom is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entided to get?"
Byorder of the Governor,
N. C. KUMAR, Deputy Secretaryto Government .
ORDER
G.O. (Rt. ) No.3406/2007/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 19th November 2007 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industriai dispute exists between ( 1 ) The Managing Director, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Tatapuram Ernakulam, ( 2) The Manager, Hindustan Lever Limited, Tatapuram, Ernakulan and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Tata Oil Milis Workers Union, Chittoor, Kochi - 18 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexare to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government , it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers anterred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Dispute. Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Governmeat nervay direct that the saud industrial dispute u reierred for 4Jjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam . The Laurour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
"Whether the dismissat tro n service Jof Sarvasree
P. K. Sanmughan, C. P. Chandran, P. V. Chandran and K. G. Mohan by the management of Hindustan Lever Limited, "Tatapurain , Eraakalain is justifiable ? If not , what rehef tacy are entitled to ? "
By order of the Governor , SUSY EAPEN,
Under Secretary to Government.