©
Government of Kerala
കേരള സർക്കാർ 2008
Reg . No. രജി . നമ്പർ KL /TV (N )/ 12 / 2006-2008
ERNMENT OF KERALA
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Vol. LIII
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY വാല്യം 53
തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ }
14th October 2008
No.
2008 ഒക്ടോബർ 14
നമ്പർ
}41 22nd Aswina 1930 1930 ആശ്വിനം 22
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G.O ( Rt . ) No 1434/2008 / LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 27th May 2008 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Dr. Sivadas , Chairman, Semalk Hospital , Kanniyampuram, Ottappalam-4 and the worker of the ab ve referred establishment Smt . P. K. Sarojini , w/o Kunjikannan Perumbarakkottil Veedu , Thottakkara P. О. , Ottappalam - 2 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (d) of the Industrial DisputesAct of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Smt . P. K. Sarojini , Lab Assistant , Semalk Hospital , Ottappalam , is justifiable ? If not, what relief she is entitled to ?
(2)
G.O. ( Rt . ) No. 1613/2008 LBR Thiruvananthapuram , 17th June 2008.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director , M/ s Sree Narayana Engineering Industries Private Limited , P.B. No. 2, Shornur- 679 122 and the workmen of the above referred establishment Sri T.P Prakasan s /o T. P. Kunjan , Thayattu Parambil House, Vadanamkurissi P. O. , Shornur- 679 124 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication:
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the ward within a period of three (nonths
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of T. P. Prakasan (Token No 273 ) , Worker , Sree Narayana Engineering Industries Private Limited, Shornur - 679 122 is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to?
(3)
(5)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 1614/ 2008 / LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram , 17th June 2008 .
G. O. ( Rt . ) No. 1616/ 2008/ LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 17th June 2008.
the Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , Prima Industries Limited , NIDA, Meanon ara Road , Kanjikode , Palakkad - 678 621 and workman of the above referred establishment Shri M. Radhakrishnan , s /o R. M. Pillai , Nair Thara , Kanjikode PalakkadPalakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri C. Kabir , s / o Kunjumoideen, Chirayinpurath , Khadeeja Manzil , Akaloor P. O. , Palakkad District and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri K. Balasubramanian , Karapurathu Veedu , Thadukkasseri P. O. , Keralassery ( via) Palakkad District- 678 641 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
Now , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Shri M. Radhakrishnan , Lab Chemist , Prima Industries Limited , NIDA , Kanjikode , " on minor issues" is justifiable ? If not , what relief he is entitled to ?
Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Balasubramanian , Operator by the management of C.K.M. Sons Movies, Pathirippala , is justifiable ? If not, what reliefhe is entitled to ?
(4)
(6) G. O. ( Rt .) No. 1787 / 2008/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 4th July 2008 .
G. O. ( Rt . ) No. 1615 /2008/ LBR. Thiruvananthapuram , 17th June 2008 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , Prima Industries Limited , NIDA Meanonpara Road , Kanjikode , Palakkad - 678 621 and the workman of the above referred establihment Shri Praveen Kumar s/ o Kuttisankaran Nair , P. V. , West Parola House, Pirayiri Post, Palakkad District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , Prima Industries Limited , NIDA , Meanonpara Road Kanjikode , Palakkad - 678 621 and the workmen, of the above referred establishment Shri K. Shaji so Κ. Balakrishnan , Kallidumbil House, Karattukurissi Post , Cherppulasseri ( via. ) Palakkad District in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication :
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal , Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( d ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947 ) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Shri K. Shaji , Lab Chemist , Prima Industries Limited, NIDA, Kanjikode " on minor issues " is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to?
Whether the dismissal of Sri Praveen Kumar , Mechanical Fitter , Prima Industries Limited NIDA, Kanjikode on 'minor issues ' is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(7)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 1859/2008 /LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th July 2008.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between ( 1 ) Shri M. G. Gopinach, Director in Charge, Comtrust India Limited, Kozhikode, 2. The Manager , Common Wealth Tile Factory , Puthiyara , Kozhikode and the workmen of the above feferred establishment represented by the General Secretary , Tile Empioyees Union , INTUC , Reg . No. 142/75 , Cheruvannur , Farokh P.O. , Kozhikode in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) ( c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of wages for one heur from 4.05 p.m. to 5.05 p . m . on 4-8-2006 to the employees of Common Wealth Tile Factory, Puthiyara ,, Calicut who are members of Tile Employees Union , INTUC namely:
1. P. Raveendranath , M. R. No. 121 2. C. T. Uthaman, M. R. No. 85
3 P. C. Babu , M. R. No. 94
4. Gangadharan , M. R. No. 176
5. Raveendran , M. R. No. 203
6. C. Krishnan , M R.No. 204
7. Radhakrishnan, M. R. No. 79
8. Santhosh Babu , M. R. No. 140
9. Renish , M. R. No. 213
10. A. K. Prabhakaran , M. R. No. 157 11. K. Raghavan
12. T. Gokulan
13. E. Sukumaran
14. Salila Kumar
15. Kousallıya
16. Uma
17. A. V. Sreedharan
18. V. P. Jayababu
19. C53 Jayaprakash
20. F3 Yashodha
is justifiable or not ? If not , what is the relief they are entitled to ?
(8)
G. O. (Rt. ) No. 1880/2008 / LBR .
Thiruvananthapuram , 15th July 2008 .
Read. 1. G. O. (Rt. ) No. 3238 /2006/ LBR dated 19-12-2006 .
2. Petition P. Gopalakrishnan , Puzhackal Veedu , Pampampallam , Kanjikode , Palakkad- 678621 . dated 6-2-2007 from 3. Letter No. I(5 ) 15751/2007 dated 18-3-2008 from the Labour Commissioner Thiruvananthapuram.
An Industrial Dispute between the manage- ment ofKerala Distilleries , Kanjikode and its workman, Shri P. Gopalakrishnan over the issue of denial of employment to the latter was referred for adjudicatian to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad under the Section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act , 1947 as per the Government Order read as first above .
2. Shri P. Gopalakrishnan, vide his petition read as 2nd paper , requested Government to change the matter of dispute for obtaining eligible benefits to the Petitioner .
3. Government have examined the matter in detail with reference to Section 10 (5) of Industrial Disputes , Act, 1947 and are pleased to change the matter of dispute as follows:
( 1) Whether as a punishment of barring 3 increments of Shri P. Gopalakrishnan , Worker, by the management of Kerala Distilleries , Kanjikode , Palakkad was Justifiable ?
(2) Whether the dismissal of P. Gopalakrishnan , Worker , by the management of Kerala Distilleries , Kanjikode , Palakkad Was Justifiable? If not , what releief he is entitled to ?.
4. The order read as Ist paper above stands modified to the above extent ,
By order of the Governor, K., CHANDRAN, Under Secretary to Government .