Government of Kerala
കേരള സർക്കാർ 2009
Reg . No. രജി . നമ്പർ
KL/TV (N)/ 12/ 2009-2011
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY
തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ Vol. LIV വാല്യം 54
No.
6th January 2009 2009 ജനുവരി 6
നമ്പർ
1
}
16th Pousha 1930 1930 പൌഷം 16
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation (A)
ORDERS
(1)
G.O. (Rt .) No. 2643/2008/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 14th October 2008.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The President , Pothanicad Farmers ' Co - operative Bank Limited No. 3510, Pothanicad P.O. and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. K. Sankaran , Kareeckal House , Koovallore P. O. , Pothanicad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Ast XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Ernakulam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
of Whether the denial of employment Shri K.K. Sankaran by the management of Pothanicad Farmers ' Co - operative Bank Limited No. 3510 is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is entitled to ?
(2) G. O. (R1 . ) No. 2670 /2008 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 16th October 2008.
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Director, Santhinikethan International School , Missionkunnu , Nilamel P. O. , Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment Smt . C. Ragini , Sreeraj Bhavan, Sasthampoika , Thattathumala P.O. , Kilimanoor in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to thisthis order ;
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise ofthe powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
to effect Whether the denial of employment Smt . C. Ragini , Ayah with from 7-6-2006 by the management of International School, Santhinikethan Nilamel P.O. is justifiable ? If not , what relief the employee is entitled to get ?
(3)
G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2671 /2008/LBR . Thiruvananthagaram, 16th October 2008.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, Veekshanam Printing and Publishing Company Limited, P. B. No. 1946, Cochin-682 018 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri Santhosh Kumar , Challiyyil Veedu , Punnappra , Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion ofGovernment it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c ) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam . The Labour Court will the award within a period of three months. pass
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Shri Santhosh Kumar , Challiyyil Veedu , Punnappra , Alappuzha by the management of Veekshanam Printing and Publishing Company Limited, P. B. No. 1946 , Cochin-682 013 is justifiable ? If not , what benefits he is entitled to ?
(4)
G. O. (Rt .) No. 2672 /2008 /LBR , Thiruvananthapuram, 16th October 2008 .
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri R. C. Babu , Proprietor , Vattakkaitha Granites, Kottavattom P. O. , Chenamkuzhi , Kottarakkara , Kollam and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri K. Madhu s/ o Kumaran , Athira Nivas, Kottavattom P. O., Chenamkuzhi, Kottarakkara in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Andwhereas, in the opinion of Government is is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) theGovernment hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court Kollam . The Labour Court will pask the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment to Shri K. Madhu , Worker by the Manage- ment of Vattakkaitha Granites , Kottavattom P. O. , Kottarakkara , Kollam District w.e.f. 22-12-2007 is justifiable ? If not , what relief the worker is entitled to get ?
(5) G. O. (Rt . ) No. 2681 /2008 /LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 17th October 2008 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Managing Driector, Plantation Corporation of Kerala Limited, Registered Office , Kottayam - 686 004 and the workman ofthe above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Plantation Corporation Staff Union ( INTUC) , Registered Office , Kottayam- 2 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexuro to thisorder;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial disputebe referred for adjudication to the Labour Court Ernakulam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
to 1. Whether the punishment awarded C.D. Auguesthy, Senior Field Assistant , Vettilappara Estate of Kalady Plantation by management , M/ s Plantation Corpora- tion of Kerala, even after found not guilty in domestic enquiry without any notice is legally justifiable or not ? 2. If not what relief he is entitled to ?
By order of the Governor, K. CHANDRAN, Under Secretaryto Government .