C
Government of Kerala
Reg . No. രജി . നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/ 12/ 2009-2011 കേരള സർക്കാർ 2009
KERALA GAZETTE
കേരള ഗസററ്
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്
Vol. LIV
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , TUESDAY
No.
7thApril 2009 2009 ഏപ്രിൽ 7
14 തിരുവനന്തപുരം , ചൊവ്വ
വാല്യം 54
നമ്പർ }
17th Chaithra 1931 1931 ചൈത്രം 17
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Rehabilitation Department Labour and Rehabilitation ( A)
ORDERS
theGovernment hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal Kozhikode . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.
ANNEXURE
(1)
G. O. (Rt .) No. 209 /2009 / LBR . Thiruvananthapuram, 16th February 2009.
Whether the denial of permanency to gate badali, workers of Cannannore Spinning and Weaving Mills , Kannur by the management is justifiable ? If not what relief they are entitled to get ?
(2) G. O. ( Rt . ) No. 237/ 2009/ LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 20th February 2009.
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mattupetty Estate , Munnar P. O. , Idukki District 685 612 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Devikulam Estates Workers Union (AITUC) Munnar P. O. , Idukki District- 685 612 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The General Manager , Cannannore Spinning and Weaving Mills , P. B. No. 1601 , Kakkad , Kannur- 5 and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by 1. The Secretary, Cannannore District Textile Mills Workers Union ( CITU ) , Kakkad. 2. The General Secretary, Spinning and Weaving Mills National Labour Union (NLO) , Kakkad , Kannur- 5, 3. The General Secretary, Kannur JillannuTexti Textile Mazdoor Union Cannannore (BMS) , Cannannore Spinning and Weaving Mills , Kakkad , Kannur - 5 , 4. The General Secretary , Cannannore Spinning and Weaving Mills Workers Union ( INTUC) , Kakkad , Kannur- 5 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government in is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Governinent it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferredby section 10 ( 1 ) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 ( 1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki . The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the dismissal of Shri Stephen, 1. PF No. 4132 of Kuttiar Division of Madupatty Estate by the management is justifiable or not ? 2. If not what relief the worker is entiled to ?
(3)
G.O. (Rt .) No. 244/2009/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 20th February 2009 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between The Manager , Marthoma College of Science & Technology, Chadayamangalam P. O. , Ayur , Kollam District - 681 534 and the workman of the above referred establishment Shri J. John , Jijo Bhavan, Cheruvakkal P. O. , Ayur , Kollam -691 533 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred ection 10 ( 1) ( c) of the Industrial of1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
of Whether the dismissal from service of Shri J. John, Watcher with effect from 29-8-2005 by the management of Marthoma College Science & Technology, Chadayamangalam P. O. , Ayur , Kollam District is justifiable ? If not , what are the relief the worker is entitled to get ?
(4)
GO. (Rt . ) No. 245 /2009 /LBR . Thiruvananthapuram , 20th February 2009 .
Whereas , the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri C. S. Anilkumar , Rohini Nivas , Kappilmukku , District Court Ward , Alappuzha and the workmen of the above referred establishment Shri Ignatius Fernandez @Justin, Carmel Villa , Canal Ward, Alappuzha in respect of matters mentioned the annexure to this order,
And whereas , in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1 ) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 ( Central Act XIV of 1947) , the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court , Kollam . The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months .
ANNEXURE
Whether the denial of employment of Shri Ignatius Fernandez , Technician , M/ s Hightech Electronics , Onida Customer Relation Centre , Sreevilasam , Indira Junction, Alappuzha by the Proprietor is justifiable? If not , what are the relief he is entitled to ? "
By order of the Governor G. SIVAPRASAD, Under Secretaryto Government .