Industrial disputes referred for adjudication

Government of Kerala കേരള സർക്കാർ

2009

Reg. No. രജി. നമ്പർ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 KERALA GAZETTE കേരള ഗസററ്

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്

No.

Vol. LIV

2009 നവംബർ 3

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY

നമ്പർ

തിരുവനന്തപുരം, ചൊവ്വ

വാല്യം 54 } } ³rd November ²⁰⁰⁹

12th Karthika 1931 1931 കാർത്തികം 12

PART I

Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Rehabilitation Department

Labour and Rehabilitation (A)

ORDERS

(1)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1203/2009/LBR.

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 18th August 2009.

Whether the denial of employment to Shri C. P. Prakasan, Painter, Noble Industries, Kadampally P. O. by the employer is justifiable or not ? If not, what relief he is entitled to?

(2)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1303/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th August 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Fareeda, E. P., Noble Industries, Balan Kinar, Kadampally P. O. and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Kannur District Vanijya Vyavasaya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), Kannur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri K. V. Sasankh, Kunnathully House, Thiruvanathu Lane, Ayyanthole P. O., Thrissur-680 003 (Proprietor, Kiran Motors) and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Thrissur District Road Transport Employees Union (CITU), Machingal Lane, Ceylon Lodgings, Thrissur-1 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

134 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment of Sri V. S. Pavanan, Conductor, Vazhinadakkal House, Thrithallam P. O. by Sri K. V. Sasankh, Kunnathully House, Ayyanthole (Proprietor, Kiran Motors) is justifiable ?

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(3)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1304/2009/LBR.

establishment Sri P. Mohanan s/o Moothoran, Edacherithazhathu Parannoor Veedu, Civil Station P. O., Kozhikode-20 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th August 2009.

Whether the denial of employment of Sri P. Mohanan, Security Staff of Government Women and Children Hospital, Calicut by the Secretary, Hospital Development Committee is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is entitled to get?

(5)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1309/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th August 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Mira Flores Estate, Padagiri P. O., Nelliyampathy, Palakkad and the workman of the above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Palakkad District Plantation and General Workers Union (HMS), Padagiri P. O., Nelliyampathy, Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

ANNEXURE

1. Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. Prabhakaran, Worker, Mira Flores Estate, Nelliyampathy by the management w.e.f. 18-7-2003 is justifiable ?

2. If not what relief the worker is entitled to get ?

(4)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1308/2009/LBR.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between 1. Sri Narayana Kaimal, Thengincherry House, Thanikkudam P. O., Thrissur District, 2. Smt. Lakshmikutty Narayana Kaimal w/o Narayanan Kaimal, Thengincherry House, Thanikkudam P. O., Thrissur District and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Lawrence, Malayappan House, Thanikkudam P. O., Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Thiruvananthapuram, 26th August 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial dispute exists between the Superintendent, Government Woman and Children Hospital, GH Road, Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred 1. Whether the denial of employment of Sri Lawrence, Tapper by the Estate Owners, Sri Narayana Kaimal and Mrs. Lakshmikutty Narayanan Kaimal, Thengincherry House, Thanikkudam P. O., Thrissur is justifiable?

2. If not what relief he is entitled to get ?

3rd NOV. 2009] KERALA GAZETTE 135

(6)

ANNEXURE

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1333/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 28th August 2009.

Whether the demand of the Union for getting . permanency of employment with retrospective effect

from 15-4-1992 to the workers Sri Ummer, Khalid, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

Hamsa and Thankappan of Pothupara Division, industrial dispute exists between The Manager, West

Manalaroo Estate, Nelliyampathy is justifiable?

Coast Fibre Industries, Pullanimedu, Thamarassery P. O.,

If not, any other relief they are entitled to?

Kozhikode and the workmen of the above referred

establishment represented by the General Secretary,

By order of the Governor, National Commercial and General Workers Union (INTUC),

G. SIVAPRASAD, Cherootty Road, Kozhikode-1 in respect of matters

Under Secretary to Government.

mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct

that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication

to the Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode. The Industrial

Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three

months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the demands raised by the National

Commercial and General Workers Union (INTUC) for

their members being workers in the West Coast

Fibre Industries, Thamarassery for wage increase

and fixation of bonus for the year 2007-08 is

justifiable? If not, what relief they are entitled to ?

(7)

G. O. (Rt.) No. 1338/2009/LBR.

Thiruvananthapuram, 29th August 2009.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an

industrial dispute exists between Sri Devadas, V., Senior

Manager, Manalaroo Estate, Padagiri P. O., Pin-678 509 and

the workman of the above referred establishment

represented by Sri M. N. Ramachandran, General Secretary,

NPW Union, Padagiri P. O., Pin-678 509 in respect of

matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is

necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for

adjudication;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by

section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947(Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said Industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months.